diff --git "a/submissions/baseline/IL_TUR_eval_gold_small.json" "b/submissions/baseline/IL_TUR_eval_gold_small.json" new file mode 100644--- /dev/null +++ "b/submissions/baseline/IL_TUR_eval_gold_small.json" @@ -0,0 +1,181988 @@ +{ + "lner": { + "fold_1": { + "115651329": [ + { + "start": 137, + "end": 153, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 252, + "end": 261, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 276, + "end": 308, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 359, + "end": 369, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 575, + "end": 585, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 637, + "end": 644, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 695, + "end": 704, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 792, + "end": 800, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1122, + "end": 1130, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1341, + "end": 1349, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1373, + "end": 1380, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 1583, + "end": 1590, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 1809, + "end": 1822, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 2229, + "end": 2242, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 2296, + "end": 2303, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 2314, + "end": 2323, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 2341, + "end": 2348, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 2491, + "end": 2494, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2501, + "end": 2513, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 2685, + "end": 2688, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2756, + "end": 2763, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 2769, + "end": 2778, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 2791, + "end": 2801, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 2814, + "end": 2829, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 2941, + "end": 2948, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3015, + "end": 3023, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 3081, + "end": 3088, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 3102, + "end": 3111, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 3225, + "end": 3232, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 3583, + "end": 3591, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 3707, + "end": 3716, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3778, + "end": 3781, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4013, + "end": 4045, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4051, + "end": 4061, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4091, + "end": 4100, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4160, + "end": 4168, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 4193, + "end": 4196, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4319, + "end": 4322, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4425, + "end": 4435, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4464, + "end": 4467, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4528, + "end": 4531, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4651, + "end": 4661, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4730, + "end": 4733, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4915, + "end": 4934, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 5380, + "end": 5383, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5715, + "end": 5722, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 5734, + "end": 5743, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 6162, + "end": 6165, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6383, + "end": 6390, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 6427, + "end": 6436, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 6696, + "end": 6704, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 6740, + "end": 6747, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 6915, + "end": 6922, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 6985, + "end": 6998, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 8040, + "end": 8043, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8053, + "end": 8066, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 8344, + "end": 8354, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8453, + "end": 8463, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9104, + "end": 9114, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9286, + "end": 9289, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9675, + "end": 9678, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10266, + "end": 10299, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10371, + "end": 10374, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10945, + "end": 10948, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11101, + "end": 11159, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 11161, + "end": 11208, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 11213, + "end": 11261, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 11551, + "end": 11554, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11673, + "end": 11713, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12186, + "end": 12233, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12474, + "end": 12477, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12574, + "end": 12577, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12911, + "end": 12945, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 13042, + "end": 13049, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13204, + "end": 13207, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13790, + "end": 13818, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 13823, + "end": 13871, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 13879, + "end": 13904, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14288, + "end": 14296, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15224, + "end": 15234, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15606, + "end": 15613, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 15629, + "end": 15637, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 15670, + "end": 15673, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15822, + "end": 15825, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15897, + "end": 15907, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 16076, + "end": 16084, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 16217, + "end": 16220, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16252, + "end": 16255, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16411, + "end": 16414, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17379, + "end": 17394, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 17427, + "end": 17439, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 17451, + "end": 17467, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 17679, + "end": 17695, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 17724, + "end": 17734, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 17819, + "end": 17830, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 17858, + "end": 17869, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 17879, + "end": 17896, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 17906, + "end": 17918, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 17929, + "end": 17940, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 17967, + "end": 17979, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 18051, + "end": 18066, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 18092, + "end": 18104, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 18523, + "end": 18539, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 18548, + "end": 18564, + "label": "CASENO" + } + ], + "37849282": [ + { + "start": 20, + "end": 42, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 72, + "end": 100, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 129, + "end": 140, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 146, + "end": 188, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 239, + "end": 253, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 255, + "end": 297, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 319, + "end": 348, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 358, + "end": 376, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 623, + "end": 633, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 911, + "end": 957, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1412, + "end": 1441, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 1467, + "end": 1477, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1488, + "end": 1520, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1529, + "end": 1558, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 1588, + "end": 1598, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1697, + "end": 1726, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 1806, + "end": 1828, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2841, + "end": 2851, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3537, + "end": 3547, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3787, + "end": 3797, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4012, + "end": 4022, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4311, + "end": 4321, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5185, + "end": 5194, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5400, + "end": 5419, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 5597, + "end": 5616, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 5888, + "end": 5917, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6257, + "end": 6267, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6866, + "end": 6876, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7575, + "end": 7584, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7741, + "end": 7751, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7856, + "end": 7865, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8016, + "end": 8026, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8162, + "end": 8172, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8435, + "end": 8445, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8447, + "end": 8457, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8459, + "end": 8469, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8471, + "end": 8481, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8483, + "end": 8493, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8498, + "end": 8508, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10440, + "end": 10450, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11617, + "end": 11627, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12838, + "end": 12848, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12923, + "end": 12933, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 14395, + "end": 14415, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 15039, + "end": 15049, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15121, + "end": 15131, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15413, + "end": 15432, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 15437, + "end": 15447, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15632, + "end": 15642, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15747, + "end": 15757, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15784, + "end": 15794, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 16148, + "end": 16158, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 17481, + "end": 17499, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 17882, + "end": 17892, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 18059, + "end": 18069, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 18419, + "end": 18429, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 18668, + "end": 18678, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 20830, + "end": 20840, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21746, + "end": 21764, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 21850, + "end": 21871, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 21930, + "end": 21951, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 22072, + "end": 22082, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 22086, + "end": 22118, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 23040, + "end": 23052, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 23093, + "end": 23111, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 23123, + "end": 23141, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "975074": [ + { + "start": 12, + "end": 40, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 77, + "end": 105, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 111, + "end": 129, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 146, + "end": 156, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 164, + "end": 179, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 191, + "end": 206, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 211, + "end": 222, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 237, + "end": 253, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 254, + "end": 269, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 270, + "end": 287, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 419, + "end": 438, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 473, + "end": 491, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 495, + "end": 524, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 564, + "end": 579, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 593, + "end": 627, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 629, + "end": 640, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2274, + "end": 2285, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2329, + "end": 2376, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2384, + "end": 2393, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2576, + "end": 2587, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2761, + "end": 2770, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3626, + "end": 3661, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3734, + "end": 3749, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3791, + "end": 3802, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3961, + "end": 3982, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4014, + "end": 4024, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4672, + "end": 4683, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4824, + "end": 4833, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5184, + "end": 5195, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5634, + "end": 5644, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5872, + "end": 5883, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6762, + "end": 6775, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 7382, + "end": 7391, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7543, + "end": 7554, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7682, + "end": 7691, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7775, + "end": 7785, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7898, + "end": 7913, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7995, + "end": 8085, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8133, + "end": 8144, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8806, + "end": 8814, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8906, + "end": 8916, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9317, + "end": 9327, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 10284, + "end": 10293, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10337, + "end": 10348, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 10422, + "end": 10433, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 10720, + "end": 10754, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10756, + "end": 10762, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11044, + "end": 11053, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12198, + "end": 12209, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 12416, + "end": 12444, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 12474, + "end": 12490, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 12598, + "end": 12626, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 12634, + "end": 12650, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 12816, + "end": 12831, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12874, + "end": 12885, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 13106, + "end": 13117, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 13250, + "end": 13261, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 13414, + "end": 13425, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 13626, + "end": 13641, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 13964, + "end": 13975, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 14314, + "end": 14322, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 14369, + "end": 14377, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16205, + "end": 16223, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 16227, + "end": 16290, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16926, + "end": 16935, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17086, + "end": 17101, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17119, + "end": 17133, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17570, + "end": 17585, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 19819, + "end": 19833, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20551, + "end": 20566, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 22206, + "end": 22217, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 22341, + "end": 22350, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 22435, + "end": 22446, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 22504, + "end": 22515, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 22616, + "end": 22627, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 22788, + "end": 22799, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 22948, + "end": 22956, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 23168, + "end": 23176, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 23250, + "end": 23311, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 23319, + "end": 23336, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 23343, + "end": 23372, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 23603, + "end": 23626, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 23636, + "end": 23665, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 25366, + "end": 25395, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 25631, + "end": 25648, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 25830, + "end": 25841, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 25956, + "end": 25985, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 27404, + "end": 27421, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 29245, + "end": 29254, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 29415, + "end": 29426, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 29521, + "end": 29530, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 29776, + "end": 29785, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 29938, + "end": 29947, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 29951, + "end": 29962, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 30058, + "end": 30079, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 30168, + "end": 30179, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 30345, + "end": 30354, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 30360, + "end": 30371, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 30585, + "end": 30594, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 30694, + "end": 30705, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 30740, + "end": 30751, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 30879, + "end": 30889, + "label": "COURT" + } + ], + "189525449": [ + { + "start": 22, + "end": 44, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 127, + "end": 153, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 155, + "end": 169, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 197, + "end": 210, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 241, + "end": 255, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 760, + "end": 770, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 818, + "end": 832, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 885, + "end": 895, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 926, + "end": 948, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 1021, + "end": 1030, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1034, + "end": 1052, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1079, + "end": 1138, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1230, + "end": 1253, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1283, + "end": 1286, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1336, + "end": 1339, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1447, + "end": 1454, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1470, + "end": 1479, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1562, + "end": 1570, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1688, + "end": 1702, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 2037, + "end": 2051, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 2214, + "end": 2222, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 2471, + "end": 2481, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 2493, + "end": 2502, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 3558, + "end": 3575, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 3767, + "end": 3775, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4014, + "end": 4028, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 4032, + "end": 4041, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4632, + "end": 4646, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 4860, + "end": 4870, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5021, + "end": 5035, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5082, + "end": 5085, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5110, + "end": 5117, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 5128, + "end": 5131, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5144, + "end": 5158, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 5174, + "end": 5180, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5603, + "end": 5611, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 5769, + "end": 5783, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 5824, + "end": 5827, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5852, + "end": 5859, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 5880, + "end": 5883, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6120, + "end": 6130, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6295, + "end": 6305, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6492, + "end": 6506, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 6556, + "end": 6564, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 6631, + "end": 6639, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 6644, + "end": 6651, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 6673, + "end": 6683, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7017, + "end": 7053, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7061, + "end": 7068, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 7958, + "end": 7967, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 7973, + "end": 8022, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8162, + "end": 8176, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 8277, + "end": 8325, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9095, + "end": 9102, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 9114, + "end": 9124, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 9190, + "end": 9200, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 9374, + "end": 9384, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 9624, + "end": 9627, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9773, + "end": 9783, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 10103, + "end": 10110, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 10633, + "end": 10647, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 10778, + "end": 10781, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11038, + "end": 11046, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 11051, + "end": 11058, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 11367, + "end": 11374, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 11610, + "end": 11617, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 13020, + "end": 13034, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 13207, + "end": 13221, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 13410, + "end": 13429, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13649, + "end": 13661, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13742, + "end": 13765, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 13773, + "end": 13785, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 13838, + "end": 13850, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 14799, + "end": 14811, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 14910, + "end": 14924, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 15025, + "end": 15039, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 15206, + "end": 15214, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 15369, + "end": 15377, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 15988, + "end": 16003, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 16032, + "end": 16075, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17051, + "end": 17061, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 17069, + "end": 17104, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17985, + "end": 17999, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 18619, + "end": 18627, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 18691, + "end": 18699, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 18925, + "end": 18933, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 19025, + "end": 19033, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 19280, + "end": 19288, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 19293, + "end": 19301, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 19682, + "end": 19690, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 19882, + "end": 19890, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 20323, + "end": 20331, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 20485, + "end": 20493, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 20588, + "end": 20596, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 20886, + "end": 20894, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 21146, + "end": 21154, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 21180, + "end": 21184, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 21472, + "end": 21479, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 21512, + "end": 21520, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 21522, + "end": 21529, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 21622, + "end": 21630, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 21647, + "end": 21654, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 21740, + "end": 21748, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 21936, + "end": 21943, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 22280, + "end": 22287, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 22321, + "end": 22328, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 22438, + "end": 22445, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 23099, + "end": 23106, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 23229, + "end": 23237, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 23857, + "end": 23867, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 24354, + "end": 24364, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 24416, + "end": 24430, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "736324": [ + { + "start": 10, + "end": 54, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 67, + "end": 99, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 123, + "end": 137, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 163, + "end": 173, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 181, + "end": 197, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 200, + "end": 217, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 233, + "end": 276, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 293, + "end": 310, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 439, + "end": 448, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 481, + "end": 498, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 502, + "end": 593, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 615, + "end": 639, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 670, + "end": 684, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 696, + "end": 742, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 800, + "end": 810, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 812, + "end": 835, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 867, + "end": 889, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 922, + "end": 932, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1027, + "end": 1040, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1092, + "end": 1100, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1458, + "end": 1471, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1492, + "end": 1501, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1829, + "end": 1845, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1857, + "end": 1903, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1937, + "end": 1946, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1963, + "end": 1976, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2114, + "end": 2123, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2175, + "end": 2210, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2212, + "end": 2219, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2281, + "end": 2291, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2295, + "end": 2305, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2428, + "end": 2445, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2573, + "end": 2582, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2623, + "end": 2633, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2708, + "end": 2717, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2780, + "end": 2798, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2800, + "end": 2820, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2822, + "end": 2842, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2844, + "end": 2864, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2866, + "end": 2886, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2891, + "end": 2911, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2988, + "end": 3008, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 4822, + "end": 4832, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4883, + "end": 4893, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5167, + "end": 5174, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5472, + "end": 5482, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5893, + "end": 5903, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6210, + "end": 6224, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 6278, + "end": 6302, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 6319, + "end": 6329, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6619, + "end": 6627, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6639, + "end": 6648, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6656, + "end": 6665, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6781, + "end": 6791, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6808, + "end": 6818, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6876, + "end": 6886, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6982, + "end": 6992, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7142, + "end": 7155, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 7199, + "end": 7216, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 7263, + "end": 7273, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7634, + "end": 7647, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 8447, + "end": 8457, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8872, + "end": 8882, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9020, + "end": 9032, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 9084, + "end": 9098, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 9173, + "end": 9187, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 9599, + "end": 9609, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9880, + "end": 9894, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 9974, + "end": 9983, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10029, + "end": 10049, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 10166, + "end": 10181, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 10188, + "end": 10197, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10210, + "end": 10223, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10520, + "end": 10529, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10574, + "end": 10582, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10676, + "end": 10684, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10771, + "end": 10791, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 11218, + "end": 11231, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 11886, + "end": 11900, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 12021, + "end": 12030, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12046, + "end": 12054, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12849, + "end": 12901, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14121, + "end": 14174, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14208, + "end": 14225, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 14518, + "end": 14528, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 15121, + "end": 15129, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15182, + "end": 15191, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 17352, + "end": 17427, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17852, + "end": 17862, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 18374, + "end": 18437, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18552, + "end": 18562, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 18779, + "end": 18789, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19135, + "end": 19145, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19457, + "end": 19481, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 19487, + "end": 19497, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19906, + "end": 19916, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 20462, + "end": 20483, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 20593, + "end": 20603, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 22855, + "end": 22878, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 23858, + "end": 23868, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 23873, + "end": 23883, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 24290, + "end": 24300, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 24547, + "end": 24557, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 24624, + "end": 24648, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 24680, + "end": 24699, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 24893, + "end": 24903, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 25173, + "end": 25197, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 25361, + "end": 25369, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 26108, + "end": 26118, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 26476, + "end": 26486, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 26650, + "end": 26660, + "label": "COURT" + } + ], + "1243363": [ + { + "start": 10, + "end": 37, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 50, + "end": 78, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 91, + "end": 174, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 202, + "end": 212, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 220, + "end": 237, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 240, + "end": 249, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 345, + "end": 362, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 884, + "end": 893, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1130, + "end": 1139, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1591, + "end": 1601, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1656, + "end": 1672, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1689, + "end": 1698, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1800, + "end": 1809, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2078, + "end": 2087, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2252, + "end": 2261, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2466, + "end": 2482, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2613, + "end": 2623, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2646, + "end": 2655, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2736, + "end": 2745, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3362, + "end": 3437, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 3444, + "end": 3472, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 3500, + "end": 3510, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3712, + "end": 3732, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 4030, + "end": 4051, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 4218, + "end": 4233, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4338, + "end": 4349, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4455, + "end": 4471, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 4801, + "end": 4816, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5038, + "end": 5048, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5189, + "end": 5205, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5378, + "end": 5394, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5452, + "end": 5468, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5608, + "end": 5709, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 5808, + "end": 5824, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5870, + "end": 5880, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6124, + "end": 6267, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 6328, + "end": 6341, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 6369, + "end": 6384, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 6410, + "end": 6425, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 6602, + "end": 6612, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8018, + "end": 8033, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8174, + "end": 8189, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 8285, + "end": 8301, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 8536, + "end": 8637, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 11764, + "end": 11782, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12541, + "end": 12559, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 14776, + "end": 14792, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 15277, + "end": 15293, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 15711, + "end": 15727, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 16321, + "end": 16337, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 16811, + "end": 16818, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 17185, + "end": 17193, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 17309, + "end": 17316, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 17343, + "end": 17350, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 17374, + "end": 17389, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17668, + "end": 17680, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17853, + "end": 17865, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18235, + "end": 18245, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 18304, + "end": 18322, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18343, + "end": 18357, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18531, + "end": 18541, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 18935, + "end": 18947, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18989, + "end": 19001, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 19010, + "end": 19036, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 19069, + "end": 19080, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 19151, + "end": 19162, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 19359, + "end": 19371, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 19555, + "end": 19583, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 19841, + "end": 19850, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 19905, + "end": 19921, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 19998, + "end": 20007, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20074, + "end": 20085, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20261, + "end": 20272, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20307, + "end": 20334, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20388, + "end": 20399, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20562, + "end": 20576, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20610, + "end": 20621, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20740, + "end": 20751, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20775, + "end": 20789, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20938, + "end": 20949, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 21040, + "end": 21060, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 21272, + "end": 21287, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 21404, + "end": 21419, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 21508, + "end": 21523, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 21636, + "end": 21652, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 22073, + "end": 22088, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 22124, + "end": 22140, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 22339, + "end": 22355, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 22460, + "end": 22476, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 22522, + "end": 22553, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 23225, + "end": 23241, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 24183, + "end": 24194, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 24355, + "end": 24366, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 24431, + "end": 24460, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 24589, + "end": 24605, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 24674, + "end": 24690, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 24796, + "end": 24812, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 24874, + "end": 24889, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 24989, + "end": 25000, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 25083, + "end": 25099, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 25450, + "end": 25466, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 25577, + "end": 25588, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 25940, + "end": 25951, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 26037, + "end": 26053, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 26164, + "end": 26180, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 26323, + "end": 26339, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 26677, + "end": 26684, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 26939, + "end": 26947, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 27113, + "end": 27129, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 27220, + "end": 27227, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 27515, + "end": 27531, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 27535, + "end": 27542, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 27814, + "end": 27821, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 27853, + "end": 27860, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 28049, + "end": 28059, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 28585, + "end": 28601, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 28935, + "end": 28951, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 29673, + "end": 29680, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 29682, + "end": 29698, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 29890, + "end": 29905, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 30185, + "end": 30201, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 30217, + "end": 30226, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 30301, + "end": 30317, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 30539, + "end": 30554, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 30619, + "end": 30626, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 30826, + "end": 30842, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 30934, + "end": 30950, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 31016, + "end": 31032, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 31200, + "end": 31207, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 31366, + "end": 31382, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 31494, + "end": 31510, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 31777, + "end": 31787, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 31831, + "end": 31976, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 32226, + "end": 32242, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 32365, + "end": 32383, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 33415, + "end": 33422, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 33430, + "end": 33446, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 33545, + "end": 33561, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 33592, + "end": 33608, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 33767, + "end": 33778, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 34372, + "end": 34378, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 34505, + "end": 34512, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 34911, + "end": 34925, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 35087, + "end": 35097, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 35170, + "end": 35182, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 35189, + "end": 35198, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 35341, + "end": 35357, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 35446, + "end": 35462, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 35469, + "end": 35476, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 35725, + "end": 35732, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 35771, + "end": 35785, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 35960, + "end": 35977, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 36020, + "end": 36040, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 36178, + "end": 36194, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 36202, + "end": 36221, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 36320, + "end": 36339, + "label": "COURT" + } + ], + "154395703": [ + { + "start": 85, + "end": 127, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 132, + "end": 174, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 246, + "end": 260, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 271, + "end": 280, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 394, + "end": 414, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 478, + "end": 498, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 564, + "end": 584, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 769, + "end": 789, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 823, + "end": 835, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 882, + "end": 893, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 1082, + "end": 1090, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1101, + "end": 1110, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1226, + "end": 1246, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 1317, + "end": 1366, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 1371, + "end": 1423, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 1428, + "end": 1448, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 1524, + "end": 1544, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 1724, + "end": 1742, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 1776, + "end": 1788, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 1834, + "end": 1845, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 1982, + "end": 2000, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 2005, + "end": 2020, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 2033, + "end": 2050, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2109, + "end": 2123, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 2133, + "end": 2146, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 2189, + "end": 2200, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 2339, + "end": 2349, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 2420, + "end": 2433, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 2539, + "end": 2549, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2659, + "end": 2676, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2714, + "end": 2746, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2807, + "end": 2827, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 2854, + "end": 2869, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2896, + "end": 2911, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 3095, + "end": 3111, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 3455, + "end": 3470, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 3484, + "end": 3508, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 4918, + "end": 4925, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 5021, + "end": 5039, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 5054, + "end": 5066, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 5131, + "end": 5147, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 5906, + "end": 5924, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 5986, + "end": 5995, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 6906, + "end": 6923, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6937, + "end": 6963, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7072, + "end": 7089, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7138, + "end": 7146, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7373, + "end": 7383, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7428, + "end": 7462, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7486, + "end": 7496, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7565, + "end": 7579, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7796, + "end": 7813, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7911, + "end": 7921, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7937, + "end": 7998, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8002, + "end": 8042, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 8770, + "end": 8780, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8796, + "end": 8881, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8917, + "end": 8974, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9012, + "end": 9018, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 9110, + "end": 9115, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 10852, + "end": 10870, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 10885, + "end": 10901, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 13349, + "end": 13359, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 13375, + "end": 13409, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 13483, + "end": 13493, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 13822, + "end": 13832, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 13932, + "end": 13944, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 14034, + "end": 14055, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14077, + "end": 14163, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14233, + "end": 14304, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14673, + "end": 14685, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15031, + "end": 15041, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15678, + "end": 15749, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15769, + "end": 15837, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15842, + "end": 15938, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17029, + "end": 17055, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17671, + "end": 17678, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18097, + "end": 18104, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18694, + "end": 18704, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 18816, + "end": 18827, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 18933, + "end": 18943, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19037, + "end": 19069, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 19196, + "end": 19303, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 19703, + "end": 19763, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 19896, + "end": 19913, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20245, + "end": 20262, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20326, + "end": 20336, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 20352, + "end": 20413, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20607, + "end": 20610, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20842, + "end": 20845, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 21544, + "end": 21593, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21628, + "end": 21640, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 21652, + "end": 21664, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 21741, + "end": 21744, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 21857, + "end": 21874, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 22337, + "end": 22349, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 23916, + "end": 23928, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 26004, + "end": 26016, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 27138, + "end": 27150, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 27656, + "end": 27666, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 27682, + "end": 27745, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 27819, + "end": 27829, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 28842, + "end": 28859, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 28871, + "end": 28920, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 28929, + "end": 28963, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 29081, + "end": 29089, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 29205, + "end": 29222, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 29564, + "end": 29590, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 29642, + "end": 29668, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 31420, + "end": 31428, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 32242, + "end": 32252, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 32967, + "end": 32977, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 33335, + "end": 33365, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 33431, + "end": 33446, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 33460, + "end": 33478, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 33497, + "end": 33514, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 33656, + "end": 33671, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 33764, + "end": 33772, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 33932, + "end": 33940, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 34092, + "end": 34108, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 34295, + "end": 34313, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 34376, + "end": 34384, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 35631, + "end": 35640, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 35644, + "end": 35653, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 35959, + "end": 35967, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 36003, + "end": 36009, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 36032, + "end": 36040, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 36354, + "end": 36360, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 36370, + "end": 36380, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 36441, + "end": 36449, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 36700, + "end": 36716, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 36786, + "end": 36801, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 36805, + "end": 36829, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 36873, + "end": 36888, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 36966, + "end": 36974, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 37013, + "end": 37031, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 37095, + "end": 37127, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 37267, + "end": 37285, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 37367, + "end": 37384, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 37413, + "end": 37445, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 37514, + "end": 37520, + "label": "JUDGE" + } + ], + "94780858": [ + { + "start": 35, + "end": 50, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 51, + "end": 97, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 114, + "end": 124, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 130, + "end": 147, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 182, + "end": 206, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 349, + "end": 359, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 557, + "end": 567, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 814, + "end": 824, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 852, + "end": 877, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 919, + "end": 922, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1113, + "end": 1123, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1255, + "end": 1265, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1345, + "end": 1355, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1359, + "end": 1369, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1570, + "end": 1573, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1607, + "end": 1622, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1623, + "end": 1669, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 3461, + "end": 3476, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 3477, + "end": 3523, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 3528, + "end": 3541, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3557, + "end": 3601, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 3620, + "end": 3629, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3640, + "end": 3661, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 3829, + "end": 3860, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 3861, + "end": 3869, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 5247, + "end": 5260, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5277, + "end": 5314, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 5346, + "end": 5378, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 5423, + "end": 5434, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 5530, + "end": 5551, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 5552, + "end": 5598, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 5846, + "end": 5854, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5924, + "end": 5943, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 6226, + "end": 6229, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6368, + "end": 6380, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6414, + "end": 6422, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7735, + "end": 7750, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 7751, + "end": 7797, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7819, + "end": 7829, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7865, + "end": 7883, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8230, + "end": 8247, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 8490, + "end": 8493, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8528, + "end": 8538, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8566, + "end": 8592, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 8699, + "end": 8702, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8817, + "end": 8820, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9413, + "end": 9426, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9442, + "end": 9457, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 9458, + "end": 9504, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9505, + "end": 9521, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9791, + "end": 9794, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9875, + "end": 9885, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9953, + "end": 9963, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10323, + "end": 10337, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 10345, + "end": 10377, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 10378, + "end": 10388, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10416, + "end": 10426, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "373587": [ + { + "start": 7, + "end": 29, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 186, + "end": 198, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 225, + "end": 239, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 329, + "end": 346, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 509, + "end": 532, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 548, + "end": 551, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 783, + "end": 786, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1033, + "end": 1043, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 1237, + "end": 1246, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1300, + "end": 1309, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1386, + "end": 1395, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1833, + "end": 1843, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1949, + "end": 1958, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3573, + "end": 3582, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3692, + "end": 3701, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3725, + "end": 3732, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 5003, + "end": 5013, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5188, + "end": 5198, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5346, + "end": 5356, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5485, + "end": 5495, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5927, + "end": 5979, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 5981, + "end": 6035, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 6037, + "end": 6090, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 6865, + "end": 6924, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7439, + "end": 7500, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8361, + "end": 8420, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9990, + "end": 10071, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10908, + "end": 10976, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12213, + "end": 12271, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12448, + "end": 12473, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12489, + "end": 12501, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12653, + "end": 12665, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12836, + "end": 12848, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13013, + "end": 13057, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14577, + "end": 14593, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15641, + "end": 15657, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15936, + "end": 15992, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16097, + "end": 16102, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16206, + "end": 16218, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16370, + "end": 16382, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17429, + "end": 17461, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17716, + "end": 17729, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 17815, + "end": 17828, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 18256, + "end": 18264, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 18489, + "end": 18498, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21381, + "end": 21393, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 22537, + "end": 22546, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 24594, + "end": 24604, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 24772, + "end": 24782, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 24908, + "end": 24922, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 24986, + "end": 24999, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "171479667": [ + { + "start": 72, + "end": 107, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 124, + "end": 156, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 158, + "end": 203, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 225, + "end": 255, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 292, + "end": 307, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 444, + "end": 478, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 485, + "end": 495, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 530, + "end": 540, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 636, + "end": 672, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 785, + "end": 795, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 956, + "end": 966, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1038, + "end": 1064, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1116, + "end": 1126, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1172, + "end": 1182, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1323, + "end": 1345, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1478, + "end": 1488, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1685, + "end": 1695, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1783, + "end": 1793, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1828, + "end": 1838, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1849, + "end": 1867, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2072, + "end": 2082, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2093, + "end": 2111, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2138, + "end": 2148, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2236, + "end": 2246, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2539, + "end": 2549, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2881, + "end": 2891, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2972, + "end": 2982, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3051, + "end": 3061, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3154, + "end": 3164, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3237, + "end": 3247, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3511, + "end": 3521, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3839, + "end": 3849, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3939, + "end": 3949, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3987, + "end": 3997, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4168, + "end": 4178, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4231, + "end": 4241, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 4252, + "end": 4270, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 4296, + "end": 4306, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4456, + "end": 4466, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4498, + "end": 4508, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4603, + "end": 4613, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4762, + "end": 4868, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4881, + "end": 4889, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5047, + "end": 5055, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5154, + "end": 5164, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5216, + "end": 5226, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5262, + "end": 5272, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5283, + "end": 5301, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5565, + "end": 5575, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5612, + "end": 5622, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5777, + "end": 5793, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5846, + "end": 5862, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5866, + "end": 5876, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6227, + "end": 6243, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 6437, + "end": 6447, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6492, + "end": 6499, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 6591, + "end": 6620, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6654, + "end": 6664, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6764, + "end": 6774, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6826, + "end": 6836, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6843, + "end": 6850, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 7049, + "end": 7056, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 7265, + "end": 7281, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 7398, + "end": 7408, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7413, + "end": 7423, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7443, + "end": 7453, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7558, + "end": 7574, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 7689, + "end": 7707, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 7866, + "end": 7882, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 7985, + "end": 7995, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8000, + "end": 8010, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8063, + "end": 8073, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8244, + "end": 8247, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 8453, + "end": 8469, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 8473, + "end": 8483, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8535, + "end": 8545, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8561, + "end": 8571, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8619, + "end": 8627, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8801, + "end": 8811, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8855, + "end": 8865, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8884, + "end": 8900, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9070, + "end": 9086, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9257, + "end": 9286, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9442, + "end": 9458, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9592, + "end": 9602, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9641, + "end": 9651, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9662, + "end": 9680, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9704, + "end": 9714, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9758, + "end": 9768, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10006, + "end": 10016, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10156, + "end": 10166, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10220, + "end": 10230, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10235, + "end": 10245, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10273, + "end": 10305, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 10313, + "end": 10323, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 10361, + "end": 10371, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10382, + "end": 10392, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 10531, + "end": 10541, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10552, + "end": 10562, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 10824, + "end": 10834, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11412, + "end": 11422, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11548, + "end": 11558, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11643, + "end": 11653, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11816, + "end": 11826, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11860, + "end": 11876, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 12670, + "end": 12680, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 12840, + "end": 12850, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 13022, + "end": 13032, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 13152, + "end": 13168, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 13352, + "end": 13368, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 13535, + "end": 13588, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 13674, + "end": 13684, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 13722, + "end": 13732, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 13825, + "end": 13835, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 13955, + "end": 13990, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14128, + "end": 14138, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 14283, + "end": 14317, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14389, + "end": 14399, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 14568, + "end": 14578, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 14713, + "end": 14763, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14829, + "end": 14880, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15125, + "end": 15135, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 15168, + "end": 15178, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15183, + "end": 15193, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15395, + "end": 15405, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15540, + "end": 15547, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 15732, + "end": 15747, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 15767, + "end": 15780, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 15793, + "end": 15809, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "1681654": [ + { + "start": 12, + "end": 31, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 49, + "end": 73, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 101, + "end": 111, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 119, + "end": 141, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 149, + "end": 171, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 172, + "end": 192, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 198, + "end": 215, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 216, + "end": 240, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 251, + "end": 263, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 264, + "end": 280, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 426, + "end": 446, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 504, + "end": 516, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2609, + "end": 2629, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2706, + "end": 2719, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2949, + "end": 2979, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 3003, + "end": 3052, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 3054, + "end": 3146, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 3311, + "end": 3406, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 3408, + "end": 3483, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 3485, + "end": 3553, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 3555, + "end": 3615, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 3620, + "end": 3712, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 3767, + "end": 3795, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 3836, + "end": 3849, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3882, + "end": 3899, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3939, + "end": 3958, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3967, + "end": 4001, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 4016, + "end": 4038, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 4040, + "end": 4053, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 4083, + "end": 4099, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 4101, + "end": 4116, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 4121, + "end": 4136, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 4167, + "end": 4178, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 4180, + "end": 4189, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 4267, + "end": 4283, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 4288, + "end": 4303, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 4384, + "end": 4395, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 4418, + "end": 4427, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 4481, + "end": 4493, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4629, + "end": 4663, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 4888, + "end": 4947, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5247, + "end": 5265, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5749, + "end": 5762, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6570, + "end": 6585, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6874, + "end": 6887, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7361, + "end": 7388, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 7412, + "end": 7430, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 7593, + "end": 7640, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7646, + "end": 7662, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7790, + "end": 7815, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7852, + "end": 7868, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8439, + "end": 8455, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8471, + "end": 8496, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8550, + "end": 8563, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9368, + "end": 9376, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9389, + "end": 9419, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9727, + "end": 9748, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 11120, + "end": 11154, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12302, + "end": 12328, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12352, + "end": 12362, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12632, + "end": 12703, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 13098, + "end": 13137, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 13599, + "end": 13653, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 13693, + "end": 13755, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14870, + "end": 14895, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14899, + "end": 14971, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16547, + "end": 16572, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16580, + "end": 16632, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16637, + "end": 16683, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16692, + "end": 16731, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16934, + "end": 16950, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 16966, + "end": 16991, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17102, + "end": 17118, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 17244, + "end": 17269, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17362, + "end": 17378, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 17449, + "end": 17474, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18384, + "end": 18409, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21856, + "end": 21881, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 22125, + "end": 22131, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 22926, + "end": 22951, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24167, + "end": 24190, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 24574, + "end": 24599, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24758, + "end": 24783, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 25206, + "end": 25231, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 25274, + "end": 25333, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 25546, + "end": 25552, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 25802, + "end": 25869, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 25897, + "end": 25917, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 26274, + "end": 26332, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26399, + "end": 26424, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26475, + "end": 26522, + "label": "COURT" + } + ], + "26855411": [ + { + "start": 18, + "end": 40, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 70, + "end": 101, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 118, + "end": 149, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 185, + "end": 213, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 236, + "end": 260, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 285, + "end": 292, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 381, + "end": 422, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 429, + "end": 444, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 509, + "end": 519, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 609, + "end": 631, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 757, + "end": 771, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 802, + "end": 831, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1134, + "end": 1146, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1826, + "end": 1919, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 2124, + "end": 2142, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2402, + "end": 2412, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2483, + "end": 2496, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2720, + "end": 2735, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2750, + "end": 2757, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2764, + "end": 2781, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2894, + "end": 2912, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3018, + "end": 3037, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3137, + "end": 3150, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3313, + "end": 3326, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3358, + "end": 3376, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3551, + "end": 3569, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3703, + "end": 3719, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3723, + "end": 3740, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3806, + "end": 3822, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3855, + "end": 3881, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4175, + "end": 4194, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4309, + "end": 4328, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4332, + "end": 4348, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4415, + "end": 4433, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4586, + "end": 4605, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4730, + "end": 4740, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4848, + "end": 4866, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4874, + "end": 4887, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4942, + "end": 4963, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5012, + "end": 5031, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5205, + "end": 5225, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5997, + "end": 6015, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6551, + "end": 6569, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7210, + "end": 7226, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7407, + "end": 7426, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7433, + "end": 7452, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7534, + "end": 7544, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7576, + "end": 7586, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7716, + "end": 7735, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7772, + "end": 7791, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7799, + "end": 7812, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8304, + "end": 8323, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8337, + "end": 8351, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8496, + "end": 8513, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8702, + "end": 8727, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 8896, + "end": 8915, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9130, + "end": 9148, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9395, + "end": 9410, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9416, + "end": 9435, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9815, + "end": 9829, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9913, + "end": 9923, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 10022, + "end": 10032, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 10618, + "end": 10637, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 10865, + "end": 10875, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 10927, + "end": 10946, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 11029, + "end": 11043, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 11109, + "end": 11123, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 11855, + "end": 11869, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 12628, + "end": 12642, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 12766, + "end": 12780, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 13211, + "end": 13248, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13337, + "end": 13351, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 13453, + "end": 13463, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 13721, + "end": 13740, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 14183, + "end": 14202, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 14443, + "end": 14458, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 14507, + "end": 14517, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 14973, + "end": 14987, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 15070, + "end": 15080, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 16412, + "end": 16426, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 16496, + "end": 16510, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 16970, + "end": 16984, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 17032, + "end": 17046, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 17332, + "end": 17350, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 17982, + "end": 18008, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18012, + "end": 18047, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 18057, + "end": 18076, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 18354, + "end": 18374, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 18459, + "end": 18478, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 18715, + "end": 18729, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 18989, + "end": 19003, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19088, + "end": 19098, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19188, + "end": 19202, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19254, + "end": 19264, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19443, + "end": 19457, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19465, + "end": 19475, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 20010, + "end": 20024, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 20092, + "end": 20106, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 20791, + "end": 20801, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 21055, + "end": 21069, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 21164, + "end": 21174, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 21307, + "end": 21321, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 21676, + "end": 21686, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 21753, + "end": 21770, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21779, + "end": 21797, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21860, + "end": 21879, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 22235, + "end": 22252, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 22360, + "end": 22379, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 22468, + "end": 22488, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 22625, + "end": 22644, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 22806, + "end": 22825, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 23087, + "end": 23101, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 23125, + "end": 23144, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 23336, + "end": 23355, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 23506, + "end": 23520, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 23952, + "end": 23962, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 24097, + "end": 24107, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 24433, + "end": 24443, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 24450, + "end": 24464, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 24604, + "end": 24645, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 24703, + "end": 24722, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 25129, + "end": 25141, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 25182, + "end": 25198, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "62854486": [ + { + "start": 75, + "end": 85, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 105, + "end": 115, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 134, + "end": 146, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 184, + "end": 203, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 225, + "end": 246, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 277, + "end": 289, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 327, + "end": 343, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 404, + "end": 410, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 439, + "end": 449, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 491, + "end": 505, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 597, + "end": 605, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1000, + "end": 1010, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1187, + "end": 1197, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1214, + "end": 1224, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1243, + "end": 1253, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1265, + "end": 1271, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1272, + "end": 1282, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1645, + "end": 1655, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1660, + "end": 1670, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1767, + "end": 1777, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1942, + "end": 1952, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2080, + "end": 2086, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2100, + "end": 2110, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3454, + "end": 3466, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 3489, + "end": 3509, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 3541, + "end": 3551, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3556, + "end": 3566, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3688, + "end": 3707, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 3788, + "end": 3798, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4712, + "end": 4737, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4742, + "end": 4813, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8806, + "end": 8838, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10000, + "end": 10013, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10078, + "end": 10091, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11036, + "end": 11049, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 11053, + "end": 11138, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 11753, + "end": 11761, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12275, + "end": 12283, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12288, + "end": 12325, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 13395, + "end": 13452, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 13963, + "end": 14004, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14176, + "end": 14184, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 14362, + "end": 14406, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14410, + "end": 14433, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 14445, + "end": 14455, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 14555, + "end": 14561, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 14570, + "end": 14580, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 14586, + "end": 14599, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 14886, + "end": 14896, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 15069, + "end": 15098, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15280, + "end": 15305, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15531, + "end": 15556, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15658, + "end": 15674, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 16092, + "end": 16183, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16188, + "end": 16285, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16339, + "end": 16358, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17715, + "end": 17721, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18012, + "end": 18044, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18249, + "end": 18329, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18700, + "end": 18706, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18795, + "end": 18811, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 18819, + "end": 18833, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "42681804": [ + { + "start": 59, + "end": 80, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 134, + "end": 154, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 167, + "end": 174, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 358, + "end": 367, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 378, + "end": 385, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 484, + "end": 495, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 514, + "end": 533, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 550, + "end": 560, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 638, + "end": 653, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 780, + "end": 799, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 818, + "end": 834, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 999, + "end": 1009, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1020, + "end": 1035, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1404, + "end": 1419, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1677, + "end": 1692, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1851, + "end": 1861, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2140, + "end": 2150, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2583, + "end": 2598, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2944, + "end": 2954, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3296, + "end": 3306, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3359, + "end": 3366, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 3474, + "end": 3489, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 3574, + "end": 3584, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3989, + "end": 3999, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 4005, + "end": 4019, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 4025, + "end": 4039, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 4048, + "end": 4066, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 4234, + "end": 4249, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 4266, + "end": 4276, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4412, + "end": 4422, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4956, + "end": 4971, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 5790, + "end": 5805, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 6520, + "end": 6530, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6639, + "end": 6654, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 6791, + "end": 6811, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7455, + "end": 7470, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 8240, + "end": 8249, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8406, + "end": 8421, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 8576, + "end": 8584, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8642, + "end": 8649, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 9007, + "end": 9015, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9072, + "end": 9079, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 9390, + "end": 9405, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 10027, + "end": 10037, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10173, + "end": 10181, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10215, + "end": 10230, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 10697, + "end": 10710, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 10720, + "end": 10733, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 10997, + "end": 11012, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 11311, + "end": 11328, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 11744, + "end": 11751, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 11852, + "end": 11861, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11863, + "end": 11878, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 12333, + "end": 12342, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12668, + "end": 12677, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12679, + "end": 12694, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 13387, + "end": 13395, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 13502, + "end": 13509, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 13566, + "end": 13581, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 13826, + "end": 13848, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 14237, + "end": 14247, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 14454, + "end": 14469, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 15147, + "end": 15157, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 15158, + "end": 15182, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 15277, + "end": 15292, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 15299, + "end": 15407, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15438, + "end": 15448, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 16343, + "end": 16358, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 17423, + "end": 17433, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 17519, + "end": 17534, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 17774, + "end": 17784, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 17801, + "end": 17908, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18413, + "end": 18428, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 18435, + "end": 18499, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18519, + "end": 18544, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18575, + "end": 18605, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 19101, + "end": 19125, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19139, + "end": 19217, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 19326, + "end": 19341, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 19458, + "end": 19530, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 19871, + "end": 19896, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 19900, + "end": 19980, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 19994, + "end": 20019, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20208, + "end": 20223, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 20355, + "end": 20371, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20582, + "end": 20598, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 21170, + "end": 21185, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 22016, + "end": 22031, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 22987, + "end": 23002, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 23902, + "end": 23917, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 24324, + "end": 24333, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 24577, + "end": 24586, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 24781, + "end": 24796, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 25592, + "end": 25607, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 26476, + "end": 26491, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 26492, + "end": 26501, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 26547, + "end": 26557, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 26625, + "end": 26645, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 26689, + "end": 26703, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 27368, + "end": 27382, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 27406, + "end": 27421, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 27952, + "end": 27972, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 27976, + "end": 28040, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 28305, + "end": 28320, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 28586, + "end": 28600, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 28654, + "end": 28668, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 28690, + "end": 28710, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 28861, + "end": 28875, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 29276, + "end": 29291, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 30257, + "end": 30317, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 30358, + "end": 30420, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 30422, + "end": 30437, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 30453, + "end": 30468, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 30528, + "end": 30542, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 30686, + "end": 30713, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 31046, + "end": 31132, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 31159, + "end": 31169, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 31425, + "end": 31440, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 31491, + "end": 31511, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 31552, + "end": 31572, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 31964, + "end": 31970, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 31981, + "end": 32033, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 32166, + "end": 32186, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 32423, + "end": 32470, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 32486, + "end": 32500, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 32639, + "end": 32654, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 33667, + "end": 33682, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 34202, + "end": 34212, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 34643, + "end": 34658, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 35060, + "end": 35069, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 35436, + "end": 35451, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 35653, + "end": 35661, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 35727, + "end": 35742, + "label": "CASENO" + } + ], + "1161164": [ + { + "start": 18, + "end": 40, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 111, + "end": 138, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 140, + "end": 164, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 190, + "end": 226, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 259, + "end": 292, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 308, + "end": 335, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 446, + "end": 485, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 502, + "end": 529, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 540, + "end": 564, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 699, + "end": 728, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1142, + "end": 1155, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1188, + "end": 1198, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1231, + "end": 1248, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1267, + "end": 1296, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1304, + "end": 1311, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1316, + "end": 1340, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 1555, + "end": 1564, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1565, + "end": 1592, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1731, + "end": 1741, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1950, + "end": 1979, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1996, + "end": 2013, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2021, + "end": 2028, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2048, + "end": 2065, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2080, + "end": 2109, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2307, + "end": 2317, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2353, + "end": 2370, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2455, + "end": 2484, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2922, + "end": 2946, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3458, + "end": 3482, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6381, + "end": 6399, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 6605, + "end": 6615, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7259, + "end": 7269, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7399, + "end": 7428, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7794, + "end": 7804, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7822, + "end": 7833, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 7977, + "end": 8006, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8026, + "end": 8035, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8250, + "end": 8279, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8305, + "end": 8313, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8321, + "end": 8329, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8358, + "end": 8387, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8544, + "end": 8559, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 8596, + "end": 8617, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8631, + "end": 8646, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 8689, + "end": 8704, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 8838, + "end": 8853, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9774, + "end": 9792, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9943, + "end": 9958, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 10018, + "end": 10036, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 10777, + "end": 10795, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 10831, + "end": 10846, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 11174, + "end": 11183, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11196, + "end": 11205, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11360, + "end": 11370, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 11414, + "end": 11431, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11615, + "end": 11644, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11649, + "end": 11657, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11662, + "end": 11673, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 11686, + "end": 11715, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11816, + "end": 11845, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11898, + "end": 11927, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12707, + "end": 12731, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 16253, + "end": 16277, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 19209, + "end": 19225, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 19432, + "end": 19448, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 19608, + "end": 19624, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 20287, + "end": 20316, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20423, + "end": 20452, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20711, + "end": 20719, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 20769, + "end": 20798, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 21025, + "end": 21054, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 21145, + "end": 21160, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 21176, + "end": 21186, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 21217, + "end": 21234, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 21249, + "end": 21278, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 21383, + "end": 21391, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21522, + "end": 21530, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21587, + "end": 21616, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 21703, + "end": 21711, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21978, + "end": 21989, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 22047, + "end": 22062, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 22095, + "end": 22124, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 22159, + "end": 22165, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 22201, + "end": 22212, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 22270, + "end": 22285, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 22333, + "end": 22339, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 22563, + "end": 22573, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 22579, + "end": 22592, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 22610, + "end": 22620, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 22668, + "end": 22697, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 22764, + "end": 22793, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 22802, + "end": 22831, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 22922, + "end": 22928, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 23019, + "end": 23048, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 23119, + "end": 23134, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 23361, + "end": 23371, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 23401, + "end": 23416, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 23458, + "end": 23476, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 23509, + "end": 23524, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 23757, + "end": 23772, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 23814, + "end": 23832, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 23936, + "end": 23944, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 24147, + "end": 24162, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 24363, + "end": 24392, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 24429, + "end": 24444, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 24551, + "end": 24559, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 24612, + "end": 24622, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 24630, + "end": 24645, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 24739, + "end": 24752, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 24757, + "end": 24770, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 24810, + "end": 24820, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 24925, + "end": 24954, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 24990, + "end": 25007, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 25226, + "end": 25233, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 25620, + "end": 25627, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 25820, + "end": 25835, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 25968, + "end": 25975, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 26016, + "end": 26045, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 26095, + "end": 26101, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 26151, + "end": 26159, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 26273, + "end": 26290, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 26573, + "end": 26581, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 26809, + "end": 26817, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 26848, + "end": 26858, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 26961, + "end": 26967, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 27102, + "end": 27117, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 27156, + "end": 27162, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 27236, + "end": 27249, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 27301, + "end": 27309, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 27339, + "end": 27349, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 27378, + "end": 27385, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 27565, + "end": 27575, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 27784, + "end": 27792, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 27886, + "end": 27896, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 28017, + "end": 28026, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 28047, + "end": 28055, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 28142, + "end": 28149, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 28159, + "end": 28188, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 28232, + "end": 28238, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 28321, + "end": 28328, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 28439, + "end": 28446, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 28506, + "end": 28512, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 29270, + "end": 29299, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 29503, + "end": 29532, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 30395, + "end": 30424, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 30744, + "end": 30755, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 30804, + "end": 30819, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 31025, + "end": 31036, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 31123, + "end": 31138, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 31177, + "end": 31188, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 31291, + "end": 31302, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 31387, + "end": 31398, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 31671, + "end": 31677, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 31773, + "end": 31781, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 31918, + "end": 31931, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 31939, + "end": 31949, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 31984, + "end": 31992, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 32003, + "end": 32032, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 32087, + "end": 32116, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 32149, + "end": 32157, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 32217, + "end": 32227, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 32296, + "end": 32306, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 32352, + "end": 32365, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 32370, + "end": 32383, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 32487, + "end": 32516, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 32544, + "end": 32559, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 32860, + "end": 32867, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 33098, + "end": 33108, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 33115, + "end": 33128, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 33133, + "end": 33146, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 33168, + "end": 33178, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 33235, + "end": 33245, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 33323, + "end": 33331, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 33337, + "end": 33347, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 33426, + "end": 33433, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 33732, + "end": 33738, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 33838, + "end": 33851, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 33856, + "end": 33869, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 33909, + "end": 33915, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 34011, + "end": 34021, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 34050, + "end": 34065, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 34072, + "end": 34078, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 34295, + "end": 34308, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 34313, + "end": 34326, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 34334, + "end": 34349, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 34531, + "end": 34546, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 34599, + "end": 34605, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 34733, + "end": 34743, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 34795, + "end": 34808, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 34813, + "end": 34826, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 34898, + "end": 34927, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 35160, + "end": 35172, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 35211, + "end": 35229, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 35242, + "end": 35257, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "95311661": [ + { + "start": 157, + "end": 177, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 214, + "end": 227, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 316, + "end": 323, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 344, + "end": 374, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 394, + "end": 407, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 457, + "end": 489, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 664, + "end": 674, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 767, + "end": 775, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 846, + "end": 849, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1016, + "end": 1029, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1076, + "end": 1091, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1110, + "end": 1118, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1120, + "end": 1133, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1267, + "end": 1277, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1404, + "end": 1417, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1515, + "end": 1525, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1694, + "end": 1703, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1805, + "end": 1818, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1866, + "end": 1875, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2161, + "end": 2169, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2337, + "end": 2350, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 2652, + "end": 2662, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2776, + "end": 2789, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 3115, + "end": 3128, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 3241, + "end": 3250, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3258, + "end": 3290, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3334, + "end": 3347, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 3538, + "end": 3541, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3684, + "end": 3694, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3847, + "end": 3860, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 3943, + "end": 3957, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 4003, + "end": 4028, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 4048, + "end": 4061, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 4121, + "end": 4157, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4316, + "end": 4325, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4458, + "end": 4490, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4518, + "end": 4550, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4799, + "end": 4820, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 4860, + "end": 4869, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4967, + "end": 4975, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5089, + "end": 5098, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5103, + "end": 5111, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5199, + "end": 5209, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5326, + "end": 5335, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5394, + "end": 5403, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6143, + "end": 6179, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8865, + "end": 8873, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8877, + "end": 8886, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9212, + "end": 9221, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 9671, + "end": 9712, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9760, + "end": 9810, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9811, + "end": 9855, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9856, + "end": 9914, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9915, + "end": 9972, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9973, + "end": 10035, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10036, + "end": 10100, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10101, + "end": 10168, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10172, + "end": 10208, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14485, + "end": 14527, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15853, + "end": 15875, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15877, + "end": 15899, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16357, + "end": 16380, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 16743, + "end": 16775, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 16859, + "end": 16891, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 17193, + "end": 17225, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 17270, + "end": 17286, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 17441, + "end": 17454, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 17514, + "end": 17527, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 17540, + "end": 17554, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "808484": [ + { + "start": 10, + "end": 40, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 53, + "end": 68, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 90, + "end": 99, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 127, + "end": 137, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 158, + "end": 171, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 254, + "end": 264, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 332, + "end": 342, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 357, + "end": 370, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 393, + "end": 476, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 636, + "end": 652, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 895, + "end": 911, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 1071, + "end": 1084, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 1183, + "end": 1196, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1354, + "end": 1367, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 1373, + "end": 1382, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 1497, + "end": 1510, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 1662, + "end": 1675, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 1799, + "end": 1812, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 1973, + "end": 1986, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2159, + "end": 2172, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2185, + "end": 2194, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2348, + "end": 2356, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2361, + "end": 2370, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2635, + "end": 2644, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2702, + "end": 2715, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 2883, + "end": 2896, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2905, + "end": 2915, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2921, + "end": 2930, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 2964, + "end": 2990, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 3017, + "end": 3030, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3176, + "end": 3185, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 3417, + "end": 3425, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3714, + "end": 3724, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4035, + "end": 4053, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 4524, + "end": 4542, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 4851, + "end": 4874, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 4919, + "end": 4936, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 5045, + "end": 5058, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5258, + "end": 5267, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 5337, + "end": 5350, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 5489, + "end": 5509, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5747, + "end": 5760, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 5926, + "end": 5939, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 6964, + "end": 6973, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 7363, + "end": 7377, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 7429, + "end": 7438, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 7531, + "end": 7551, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7773, + "end": 7786, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8237, + "end": 8251, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8499, + "end": 8554, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8563, + "end": 8591, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8760, + "end": 8773, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8832, + "end": 8845, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9040, + "end": 9053, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9541, + "end": 9554, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9787, + "end": 9796, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 9911, + "end": 9924, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10316, + "end": 10329, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10524, + "end": 10537, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10692, + "end": 10705, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 11842, + "end": 11855, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 11955, + "end": 11969, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12021, + "end": 12034, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 12418, + "end": 12427, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 12478, + "end": 12487, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 12634, + "end": 12656, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12675, + "end": 12689, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 13131, + "end": 13140, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 13163, + "end": 13176, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 13555, + "end": 13564, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 13685, + "end": 13707, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 13730, + "end": 13744, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 14496, + "end": 14509, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 14561, + "end": 14574, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 14720, + "end": 14733, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 14790, + "end": 14803, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 14872, + "end": 14890, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15237, + "end": 15250, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 15304, + "end": 15313, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 15552, + "end": 15561, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 15604, + "end": 15622, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 15726, + "end": 15735, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 15844, + "end": 15857, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 16988, + "end": 17001, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 17178, + "end": 17201, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17205, + "end": 17214, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 17749, + "end": 17762, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 17956, + "end": 17969, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 19562, + "end": 19575, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 19712, + "end": 19751, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 19950, + "end": 19958, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 19962, + "end": 19970, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 20068, + "end": 20081, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 20469, + "end": 20478, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 20543, + "end": 20556, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 20725, + "end": 20738, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 20833, + "end": 20842, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 21053, + "end": 21066, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 21109, + "end": 21122, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 21276, + "end": 21289, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 21850, + "end": 21863, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 21978, + "end": 21991, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 22113, + "end": 22122, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 22240, + "end": 22249, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 22309, + "end": 22322, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 22420, + "end": 22429, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 22503, + "end": 22516, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 23013, + "end": 23030, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 23364, + "end": 23377, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 23511, + "end": 23520, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 23598, + "end": 23611, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 23768, + "end": 23777, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 23912, + "end": 23929, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 24060, + "end": 24073, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 24415, + "end": 24428, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 24464, + "end": 24473, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 24617, + "end": 24637, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24802, + "end": 24815, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 24944, + "end": 24953, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 25341, + "end": 25361, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 25496, + "end": 25510, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 25602, + "end": 25611, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 25674, + "end": 25688, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 25887, + "end": 25907, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 25964, + "end": 25977, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 26165, + "end": 26178, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 26687, + "end": 26726, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 28600, + "end": 28613, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 28900, + "end": 28910, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 29584, + "end": 29597, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 29615, + "end": 29628, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 30653, + "end": 30666, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 30668, + "end": 30680, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 30759, + "end": 30772, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 30836, + "end": 30846, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 31029, + "end": 31042, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 31258, + "end": 31271, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 31503, + "end": 31516, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 31691, + "end": 31780, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 32245, + "end": 32265, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 32687, + "end": 32697, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 32824, + "end": 32838, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 32910, + "end": 32923, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 33711, + "end": 33731, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 34193, + "end": 34202, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 34296, + "end": 34309, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 34577, + "end": 34590, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 34698, + "end": 34707, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 35093, + "end": 35106, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 35280, + "end": 35289, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 35347, + "end": 35356, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 35543, + "end": 35552, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 35925, + "end": 35934, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 35969, + "end": 35978, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 36100, + "end": 36109, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 36276, + "end": 36285, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 36447, + "end": 36456, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 36537, + "end": 36546, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 36888, + "end": 36897, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 36994, + "end": 37007, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 37088, + "end": 37101, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 37155, + "end": 37168, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 37394, + "end": 37407, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 37568, + "end": 37581, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 37618, + "end": 37627, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 37676, + "end": 37689, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 37763, + "end": 37773, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 37906, + "end": 37915, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 37955, + "end": 37978, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 38008, + "end": 38017, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 38291, + "end": 38300, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 38321, + "end": 38331, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 38487, + "end": 38496, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 38617, + "end": 38630, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 39025, + "end": 39034, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 39038, + "end": 39051, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 39219, + "end": 39232, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 39478, + "end": 39491, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 39735, + "end": 39748, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 39900, + "end": 39909, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 40165, + "end": 40178, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 40184, + "end": 40193, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 40243, + "end": 40256, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 40368, + "end": 40381, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 40518, + "end": 40531, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 40633, + "end": 40638, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 40786, + "end": 40791, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 41124, + "end": 41138, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 41203, + "end": 41217, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 41225, + "end": 41234, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 41301, + "end": 41317, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 41333, + "end": 41339, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 41383, + "end": 41398, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 41414, + "end": 41420, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 41493, + "end": 41499, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 41586, + "end": 41594, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 41748, + "end": 41757, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 41959, + "end": 41968, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 42327, + "end": 42340, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 42616, + "end": 42629, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 42806, + "end": 42819, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 42867, + "end": 42876, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 43129, + "end": 43142, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 43500, + "end": 43509, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 43580, + "end": 43593, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 43674, + "end": 43687, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 43731, + "end": 43740, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 43963, + "end": 43976, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 44282, + "end": 44295, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 44734, + "end": 44747, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 44817, + "end": 44830, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 44971, + "end": 44984, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 45202, + "end": 45215, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 45297, + "end": 45310, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 45529, + "end": 45538, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 45673, + "end": 45686, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 46057, + "end": 46066, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 46271, + "end": 46280, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 46333, + "end": 46346, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 46512, + "end": 46521, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 46538, + "end": 46551, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 46685, + "end": 46698, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 47282, + "end": 47292, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 47474, + "end": 47487, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 47514, + "end": 47616, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 47745, + "end": 47768, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 47808, + "end": 47837, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 47884, + "end": 47893, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 47952, + "end": 47965, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 48200, + "end": 48228, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 48602, + "end": 48619, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 49582, + "end": 49587, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 49626, + "end": 49644, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 49659, + "end": 49699, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 49779, + "end": 49792, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 49827, + "end": 49839, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 49940, + "end": 49944, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 49983, + "end": 49996, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 50163, + "end": 50167, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 50315, + "end": 50319, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 50353, + "end": 50362, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 50695, + "end": 50708, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 50916, + "end": 50929, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 51099, + "end": 51112, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 51368, + "end": 51391, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 52398, + "end": 52408, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 52653, + "end": 52666, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 53021, + "end": 53034, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 53074, + "end": 53092, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 53380, + "end": 53398, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 53479, + "end": 53488, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 53550, + "end": 53563, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 53570, + "end": 53580, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 53585, + "end": 53594, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 53704, + "end": 53717, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 53834, + "end": 53847, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 53995, + "end": 54008, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 54119, + "end": 54132, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 54139, + "end": 54157, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 54278, + "end": 54287, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 54720, + "end": 54777, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 54909, + "end": 54962, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 55604, + "end": 55622, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 56778, + "end": 56791, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 56812, + "end": 56825, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 57101, + "end": 57114, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 57362, + "end": 57390, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 57623, + "end": 57636, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 57803, + "end": 57816, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 58095, + "end": 58108, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 58349, + "end": 58362, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 59269, + "end": 59282, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 59304, + "end": 59317, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 59481, + "end": 59494, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 59588, + "end": 59601, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 59742, + "end": 59755, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 59914, + "end": 59927, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 60029, + "end": 60042, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 60260, + "end": 60283, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 60310, + "end": 60323, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 60550, + "end": 60563, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 60635, + "end": 60644, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 60760, + "end": 60773, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 61359, + "end": 61368, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 61969, + "end": 61982, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 62039, + "end": 62052, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 62284, + "end": 62297, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 62468, + "end": 62481, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 62651, + "end": 62664, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 63081, + "end": 63094, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 63410, + "end": 63419, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 63487, + "end": 63500, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 63568, + "end": 63581, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 63749, + "end": 63762, + "label": "AUTH" + } + ], + "1646640": [ + { + "start": 12, + "end": 26, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 50, + "end": 69, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 93, + "end": 103, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 111, + "end": 130, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 142, + "end": 161, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 166, + "end": 176, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 192, + "end": 205, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 206, + "end": 222, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 223, + "end": 239, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 240, + "end": 255, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 256, + "end": 273, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 291, + "end": 306, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 311, + "end": 326, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 329, + "end": 344, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 347, + "end": 363, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 366, + "end": 383, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 386, + "end": 408, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 411, + "end": 427, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 433, + "end": 467, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 819, + "end": 831, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1167, + "end": 1179, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1331, + "end": 1365, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1378, + "end": 1396, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1489, + "end": 1499, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1721, + "end": 1731, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1918, + "end": 1928, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2024, + "end": 2034, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2216, + "end": 2226, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2245, + "end": 2263, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2556, + "end": 2568, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2604, + "end": 2614, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2938, + "end": 2952, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 3507, + "end": 3517, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3533, + "end": 3570, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3723, + "end": 3751, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4655, + "end": 4665, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5034, + "end": 5044, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5523, + "end": 5533, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 6650, + "end": 6658, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 6675, + "end": 6689, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 6712, + "end": 6769, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7009, + "end": 7040, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7145, + "end": 7157, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7566, + "end": 7628, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7630, + "end": 7693, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7695, + "end": 7750, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7752, + "end": 7799, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7815, + "end": 7873, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7875, + "end": 7925, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7927, + "end": 7995, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7997, + "end": 8099, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8104, + "end": 8164, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9294, + "end": 9365, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9371, + "end": 9442, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9834, + "end": 9844, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 10120, + "end": 10145, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10162, + "end": 10180, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 10348, + "end": 10358, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 10689, + "end": 10699, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 12391, + "end": 12456, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12458, + "end": 12517, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12519, + "end": 12592, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12594, + "end": 12653, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12655, + "end": 12737, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12739, + "end": 12794, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12796, + "end": 12876, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12881, + "end": 12923, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12971, + "end": 13005, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 14699, + "end": 14733, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15115, + "end": 15127, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15195, + "end": 15205, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 15519, + "end": 15529, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 15588, + "end": 15598, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 15820, + "end": 15830, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 15929, + "end": 15939, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 17451, + "end": 17461, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 18107, + "end": 18170, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18172, + "end": 18232, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18234, + "end": 18282, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18284, + "end": 18345, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18350, + "end": 18403, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 19596, + "end": 19606, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 19843, + "end": 19853, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 20212, + "end": 20222, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 20561, + "end": 20589, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20684, + "end": 20694, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 20780, + "end": 20790, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 21233, + "end": 21243, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 21335, + "end": 21345, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 22090, + "end": 22100, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 22592, + "end": 22602, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 23314, + "end": 23324, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 23572, + "end": 23585, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 23689, + "end": 23702, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 23791, + "end": 23804, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 23976, + "end": 23986, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 24268, + "end": 24297, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 24337, + "end": 24347, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 24355, + "end": 24371, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 24375, + "end": 24397, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 24399, + "end": 24411, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 24442, + "end": 24458, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 24460, + "end": 24474, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 24479, + "end": 24491, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 24512, + "end": 24522, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 24524, + "end": 24535, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 24537, + "end": 24548, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 24550, + "end": 24563, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 24565, + "end": 24580, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 24587, + "end": 24597, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 24602, + "end": 24613, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 24678, + "end": 24693, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 24742, + "end": 24757, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24762, + "end": 24771, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24811, + "end": 24851, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 25573, + "end": 25607, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 25786, + "end": 25804, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 25939, + "end": 25957, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 26030, + "end": 26048, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 26097, + "end": 26125, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 26377, + "end": 26387, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 26482, + "end": 26492, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 26715, + "end": 26725, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 27149, + "end": 27180, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 27419, + "end": 27444, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 27502, + "end": 27527, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 27540, + "end": 27558, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 27939, + "end": 27957, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 28116, + "end": 28134, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 28142, + "end": 28169, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 28185, + "end": 28219, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 28234, + "end": 28268, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 28311, + "end": 28345, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 28350, + "end": 28368, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 28618, + "end": 28634, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 28929, + "end": 28939, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 29109, + "end": 29119, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 29209, + "end": 29219, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 29225, + "end": 29239, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 29327, + "end": 29337, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 29356, + "end": 29370, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 29404, + "end": 29416, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 29519, + "end": 29529, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 29566, + "end": 29602, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 31042, + "end": 31052, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 31162, + "end": 31172, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 36754, + "end": 36764, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 37912, + "end": 37974, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 38207, + "end": 38262, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 38264, + "end": 38311, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 38327, + "end": 38385, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 38387, + "end": 38437, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 38439, + "end": 38507, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 38509, + "end": 38519, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 38575, + "end": 38589, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 38612, + "end": 38672, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 41421, + "end": 41440, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 41445, + "end": 41489, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 41584, + "end": 41609, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 41665, + "end": 41677, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 41925, + "end": 41994, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 42468, + "end": 42539, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 43220, + "end": 43241, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 43365, + "end": 43373, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 43389, + "end": 43403, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 43424, + "end": 43436, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 43509, + "end": 43548, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 43607, + "end": 43625, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 43633, + "end": 43658, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 43660, + "end": 43671, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 43727, + "end": 43730, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 43809, + "end": 43821, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 44756, + "end": 44781, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 45094, + "end": 45097, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 45156, + "end": 45161, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 46582, + "end": 46647, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 46802, + "end": 46861, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 46883, + "end": 46913, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 47367, + "end": 47374, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 47845, + "end": 47884, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 47912, + "end": 47922, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 48015, + "end": 48064, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 48227, + "end": 48304, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 48543, + "end": 48600, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 48621, + "end": 48632, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 48641, + "end": 48649, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 48773, + "end": 48815, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 49332, + "end": 49342, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 49371, + "end": 49386, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 49392, + "end": 49400, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 49416, + "end": 49426, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 49538, + "end": 49548, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 49666, + "end": 49676, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 49710, + "end": 49735, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 49752, + "end": 49770, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 49949, + "end": 49959, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 50125, + "end": 50143, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 50652, + "end": 50670, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 51287, + "end": 51307, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 51410, + "end": 51428, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 51739, + "end": 51757, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 51852, + "end": 51862, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 52207, + "end": 52217, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 54233, + "end": 54239, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 54243, + "end": 54276, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 54672, + "end": 54678, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 54975, + "end": 54981, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 55533, + "end": 55569, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 55676, + "end": 55701, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 55707, + "end": 55741, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 56249, + "end": 56267, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 56623, + "end": 56641, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 56783, + "end": 56801, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 56915, + "end": 56934, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 58038, + "end": 58057, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 58184, + "end": 58218, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 58240, + "end": 58276, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 60216, + "end": 60250, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 60320, + "end": 60354, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 60549, + "end": 60578, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 61191, + "end": 61220, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 61665, + "end": 61675, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 62681, + "end": 62709, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 62965, + "end": 62975, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 63414, + "end": 63424, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 64930, + "end": 64940, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 65101, + "end": 65111, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 65242, + "end": 65252, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 65280, + "end": 65290, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 65351, + "end": 65361, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 65588, + "end": 65598, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 66440, + "end": 66450, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 66522, + "end": 66532, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 66669, + "end": 66679, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 66871, + "end": 66881, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 67348, + "end": 67358, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 67531, + "end": 67541, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 67762, + "end": 67772, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 67946, + "end": 67956, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 68176, + "end": 68186, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 68306, + "end": 68316, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 68505, + "end": 68515, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 68753, + "end": 68763, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 69571, + "end": 69581, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 70122, + "end": 70150, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 71246, + "end": 71258, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 71314, + "end": 71328, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 71400, + "end": 71428, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 71697, + "end": 71725, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 71847, + "end": 71884, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 72029, + "end": 72039, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 72789, + "end": 72799, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 73281, + "end": 73291, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 73307, + "end": 73346, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 73371, + "end": 73381, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 73475, + "end": 73503, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 74658, + "end": 74686, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 76121, + "end": 76131, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 77550, + "end": 77578, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 77628, + "end": 77656, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 77854, + "end": 77882, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 78125, + "end": 78135, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 78560, + "end": 78588, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 78956, + "end": 78968, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 79036, + "end": 79046, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 79366, + "end": 79376, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 79850, + "end": 79860, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 79961, + "end": 79971, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 81992, + "end": 82002, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 82058, + "end": 82068, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 84489, + "end": 84499, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 84552, + "end": 84562, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 84585, + "end": 84595, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 84818, + "end": 84828, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 85590, + "end": 85600, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 85703, + "end": 85713, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 85989, + "end": 86052, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 86054, + "end": 86114, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 86116, + "end": 86147, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 86149, + "end": 86188, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 86194, + "end": 86230, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 86446, + "end": 86492, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 86525, + "end": 86539, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 86607, + "end": 86629, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 86790, + "end": 86806, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 86950, + "end": 86992, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 87070, + "end": 87088, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 87267, + "end": 87285, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 87388, + "end": 87401, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 87415, + "end": 87423, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 87665, + "end": 87686, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 88073, + "end": 88108, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 88203, + "end": 88221, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 88897, + "end": 88907, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 89944, + "end": 89954, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 90080, + "end": 90090, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 90254, + "end": 90264, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 90522, + "end": 90532, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 90785, + "end": 90813, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 91506, + "end": 91520, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 91762, + "end": 91772, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 92169, + "end": 92179, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 92340, + "end": 92350, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 92956, + "end": 92968, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 92993, + "end": 93005, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 93047, + "end": 93052, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 93490, + "end": 93495, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 93977, + "end": 93987, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 95099, + "end": 95108, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 97977, + "end": 97987, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 99015, + "end": 99025, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 99127, + "end": 99137, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 99401, + "end": 99406, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 100551, + "end": 100561, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 100664, + "end": 100674, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 101410, + "end": 101424, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 101718, + "end": 101735, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 101978, + "end": 101992, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 102900, + "end": 102913, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 102977, + "end": 102994, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 103413, + "end": 103423, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 103670, + "end": 103683, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 103784, + "end": 103797, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 103908, + "end": 103921, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 104211, + "end": 104221, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 104299, + "end": 104309, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 104678, + "end": 104692, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 104761, + "end": 104771, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 104878, + "end": 104888, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 104915, + "end": 104929, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 105023, + "end": 105045, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 105227, + "end": 105241, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 105743, + "end": 105753, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 105782, + "end": 105792, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 106033, + "end": 106043, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 106299, + "end": 106309, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 106370, + "end": 106375, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 106912, + "end": 106923, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "1992267": [ + { + "start": 111, + "end": 148, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 149, + "end": 159, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 194, + "end": 207, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 278, + "end": 316, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 317, + "end": 331, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 359, + "end": 372, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 413, + "end": 420, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 515, + "end": 525, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 532, + "end": 542, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 546, + "end": 582, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 663, + "end": 685, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 917, + "end": 939, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 973, + "end": 983, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1224, + "end": 1242, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2196, + "end": 2205, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2495, + "end": 2505, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2799, + "end": 2808, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2839, + "end": 2910, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2930, + "end": 2940, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3113, + "end": 3139, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3446, + "end": 3535, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3723, + "end": 3732, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3815, + "end": 3825, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4120, + "end": 4130, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4156, + "end": 4177, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4183, + "end": 4193, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4216, + "end": 4226, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4437, + "end": 4447, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4558, + "end": 4568, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 4672, + "end": 4682, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5251, + "end": 5261, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6319, + "end": 6339, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6347, + "end": 6359, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7846, + "end": 7858, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8108, + "end": 8120, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8493, + "end": 8505, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9533, + "end": 9637, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9817, + "end": 9829, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10669, + "end": 10681, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10828, + "end": 10848, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10970, + "end": 11073, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 11553, + "end": 11659, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12460, + "end": 12486, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12529, + "end": 12567, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12699, + "end": 12736, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12740, + "end": 12816, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12857, + "end": 12861, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12968, + "end": 12982, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 13370, + "end": 13385, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 13467, + "end": 13487, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 14109, + "end": 14124, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 14202, + "end": 14218, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 14242, + "end": 14259, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 14491, + "end": 14503, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15681, + "end": 15774, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15909, + "end": 15921, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16240, + "end": 16250, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17530, + "end": 17577, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17882, + "end": 17892, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 18271, + "end": 18288, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 18422, + "end": 18437, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 18540, + "end": 18557, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 18629, + "end": 18647, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 18808, + "end": 18828, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 18888, + "end": 18911, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 19216, + "end": 19234, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 19304, + "end": 19319, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 19390, + "end": 19410, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 19467, + "end": 19487, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 20263, + "end": 20273, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 21497, + "end": 21509, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 21548, + "end": 21566, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 21568, + "end": 21582, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "190580": [ + { + "start": 10, + "end": 37, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 38, + "end": 65, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 66, + "end": 93, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 94, + "end": 121, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 122, + "end": 149, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 150, + "end": 177, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 194, + "end": 212, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 238, + "end": 259, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 285, + "end": 295, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 303, + "end": 312, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 315, + "end": 329, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 533, + "end": 557, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 877, + "end": 907, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 946, + "end": 952, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 967, + "end": 988, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1005, + "end": 1023, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1109, + "end": 1124, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1177, + "end": 1188, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1549, + "end": 1564, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1738, + "end": 1748, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2113, + "end": 2123, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2152, + "end": 2160, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3101, + "end": 3116, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3233, + "end": 3248, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3538, + "end": 3563, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3574, + "end": 3598, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7850, + "end": 7873, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8188, + "end": 8242, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8348, + "end": 8386, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 11928, + "end": 11959, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12760, + "end": 12791, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12929, + "end": 12960, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13689, + "end": 13704, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 13749, + "end": 13764, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 14441, + "end": 14456, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 14625, + "end": 14640, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 14856, + "end": 14871, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 15115, + "end": 15130, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 16192, + "end": 16202, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 16412, + "end": 16435, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 16576, + "end": 16594, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17966, + "end": 17984, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18071, + "end": 18089, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18151, + "end": 18258, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18313, + "end": 18327, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 18358, + "end": 18383, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 19779, + "end": 19800, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 20769, + "end": 20793, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20798, + "end": 20831, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 21116, + "end": 21131, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 21679, + "end": 21708, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 21760, + "end": 21790, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 22296, + "end": 22311, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 24196, + "end": 24286, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 28556, + "end": 28570, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 28754, + "end": 28764, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 33545, + "end": 33560, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 37284, + "end": 37308, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 39547, + "end": 39578, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 39919, + "end": 39950, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 47704, + "end": 47720, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 49143, + "end": 49153, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 49248, + "end": 49336, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 50191, + "end": 50200, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 50429, + "end": 50439, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 50526, + "end": 50535, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 50581, + "end": 50621, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 50732, + "end": 50750, + "label": "STAT" + } + ], + "39503956": [ + { + "start": 0, + "end": 22, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 23, + "end": 43, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 93, + "end": 103, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 137, + "end": 152, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 153, + "end": 175, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 179, + "end": 201, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 202, + "end": 213, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 262, + "end": 284, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 317, + "end": 331, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 395, + "end": 414, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 416, + "end": 435, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 525, + "end": 535, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 546, + "end": 564, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 645, + "end": 657, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 678, + "end": 687, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 693, + "end": 715, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 716, + "end": 736, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1789, + "end": 1811, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1812, + "end": 1832, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2653, + "end": 2663, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3105, + "end": 3115, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3166, + "end": 3188, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 3189, + "end": 3209, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 3714, + "end": 3743, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 3747, + "end": 3769, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 3776, + "end": 3786, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3982, + "end": 4035, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 4048, + "end": 4065, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 4341, + "end": 4363, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 4364, + "end": 4384, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 4827, + "end": 4842, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5045, + "end": 5060, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5855, + "end": 5877, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 5878, + "end": 5898, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 6249, + "end": 6339, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 6862, + "end": 6875, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6889, + "end": 6915, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 6926, + "end": 6939, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7023, + "end": 7169, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7404, + "end": 7426, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 7427, + "end": 7447, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 7610, + "end": 7623, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7637, + "end": 7663, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7674, + "end": 7687, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8187, + "end": 8200, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 8881, + "end": 8903, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 8904, + "end": 8924, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 10406, + "end": 10428, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 10429, + "end": 10449, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 11121, + "end": 11147, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 11999, + "end": 12021, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 12022, + "end": 12042, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 12324, + "end": 12337, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 12413, + "end": 12427, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13498, + "end": 13520, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 13521, + "end": 13541, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 14055, + "end": 14081, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14387, + "end": 14488, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14523, + "end": 14536, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 14799, + "end": 14849, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15039, + "end": 15061, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 15062, + "end": 15082, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 15513, + "end": 15516, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15826, + "end": 15836, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15875, + "end": 15885, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15998, + "end": 16017, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 16095, + "end": 16101, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16347, + "end": 16367, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 16614, + "end": 16636, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 16637, + "end": 16657, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 17206, + "end": 17220, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17487, + "end": 17506, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 17734, + "end": 17740, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17785, + "end": 17791, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18143, + "end": 18165, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 18166, + "end": 18186, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 18736, + "end": 18808, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18843, + "end": 18856, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19125, + "end": 19138, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19495, + "end": 19508, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19619, + "end": 19641, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 19642, + "end": 19662, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 19935, + "end": 19945, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 20008, + "end": 20018, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 20130, + "end": 20140, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 20299, + "end": 20309, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 20413, + "end": 20423, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21146, + "end": 21168, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 21169, + "end": 21189, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 22587, + "end": 22609, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 22610, + "end": 22630, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 23330, + "end": 23373, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 23386, + "end": 23403, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 23523, + "end": 23562, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 23852, + "end": 23874, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 23875, + "end": 23895, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 24285, + "end": 24315, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24366, + "end": 24476, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24556, + "end": 24570, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 24932, + "end": 24967, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 25248, + "end": 25270, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 25271, + "end": 25291, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 25334, + "end": 25347, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 25414, + "end": 25476, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26085, + "end": 26095, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 26181, + "end": 26268, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26799, + "end": 26821, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 26822, + "end": 26842, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 27798, + "end": 27937, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 28073, + "end": 28086, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 28383, + "end": 28405, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 28406, + "end": 28426, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 29892, + "end": 29914, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 29915, + "end": 29935, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 31287, + "end": 31309, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 31310, + "end": 31330, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 32210, + "end": 32269, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 32282, + "end": 32304, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 32311, + "end": 32343, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 32357, + "end": 32370, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 32423, + "end": 32438, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 32771, + "end": 32781, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 33143, + "end": 33153, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 33419, + "end": 33429, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 33683, + "end": 33705, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 33706, + "end": 33726, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 33727, + "end": 33741, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 34150, + "end": 34225, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 34238, + "end": 34255, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 34269, + "end": 34282, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 34308, + "end": 34382, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 34944, + "end": 34966, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 34967, + "end": 34987, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 35068, + "end": 35122, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 36433, + "end": 36475, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 36476, + "end": 36498, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 36499, + "end": 36519, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 36594, + "end": 36608, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 38008, + "end": 38030, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 38031, + "end": 38051, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 38071, + "end": 38151, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 38164, + "end": 38181, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 38195, + "end": 38214, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 39327, + "end": 39349, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 39350, + "end": 39370, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 40774, + "end": 40796, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 40797, + "end": 40817, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 42117, + "end": 42139, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 42140, + "end": 42160, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 42169, + "end": 42182, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 42198, + "end": 42216, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 42238, + "end": 42248, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 43252, + "end": 43274, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 43275, + "end": 43295, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 44263, + "end": 44285, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 44286, + "end": 44306, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 44360, + "end": 44382, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 44447, + "end": 44469, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 44516, + "end": 44526, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 44556, + "end": 44578, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 44579, + "end": 44599, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 44600, + "end": 44615, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 44673, + "end": 44695, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 44699, + "end": 44721, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 44722, + "end": 44732, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "1922398": [ + { + "start": 12, + "end": 31, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 56, + "end": 94, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 127, + "end": 137, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 145, + "end": 155, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 167, + "end": 177, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 182, + "end": 194, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 200, + "end": 214, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 225, + "end": 237, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 238, + "end": 254, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 255, + "end": 273, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 274, + "end": 289, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 290, + "end": 307, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 313, + "end": 333, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 478, + "end": 491, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 492, + "end": 504, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 577, + "end": 597, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1026, + "end": 1036, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1060, + "end": 1070, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1327, + "end": 1344, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1418, + "end": 1428, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1439, + "end": 1468, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1564, + "end": 1578, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3094, + "end": 3163, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 3494, + "end": 3506, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3916, + "end": 3929, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4052, + "end": 4064, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4570, + "end": 4591, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 4803, + "end": 4817, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 4839, + "end": 4878, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 4966, + "end": 4980, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 5015, + "end": 5022, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 5129, + "end": 5143, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 5244, + "end": 5303, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 5399, + "end": 5413, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 5488, + "end": 5523, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 5559, + "end": 5568, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5576, + "end": 5594, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5598, + "end": 5613, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 5635, + "end": 5645, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 5647, + "end": 5659, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 5665, + "end": 5676, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 5678, + "end": 5691, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 5693, + "end": 5707, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 5709, + "end": 5725, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 5730, + "end": 5744, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 5769, + "end": 5785, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 5795, + "end": 5808, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 5873, + "end": 5877, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 5969, + "end": 5989, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6087, + "end": 6105, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6360, + "end": 6372, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7436, + "end": 7457, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9375, + "end": 9396, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10937, + "end": 10955, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 11150, + "end": 11162, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11167, + "end": 11185, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 11328, + "end": 11338, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 11843, + "end": 11853, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 11881, + "end": 11891, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 12005, + "end": 12074, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12213, + "end": 12241, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 16141, + "end": 16180, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16312, + "end": 16326, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16388, + "end": 16398, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 16519, + "end": 16529, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 16611, + "end": 16625, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16828, + "end": 16840, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17124, + "end": 17138, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17173, + "end": 17212, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18293, + "end": 18305, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18423, + "end": 18443, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18450, + "end": 18457, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18573, + "end": 18593, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 19926, + "end": 19938, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20049, + "end": 20069, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20095, + "end": 20114, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 20120, + "end": 20141, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 20328, + "end": 20340, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 22814, + "end": 22827, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 23070, + "end": 23090, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 23098, + "end": 23108, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 23126, + "end": 23136, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 23138, + "end": 23156, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 23158, + "end": 23183, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 23185, + "end": 23212, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 23221, + "end": 23240, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 23244, + "end": 23310, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 23490, + "end": 23564, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 23569, + "end": 23621, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 23848, + "end": 23860, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 23962, + "end": 23982, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24585, + "end": 24597, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 24648, + "end": 24668, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24672, + "end": 24679, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24748, + "end": 24758, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 24837, + "end": 24849, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 25362, + "end": 25383, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 25549, + "end": 25558, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 25560, + "end": 25569, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 25574, + "end": 25582, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 26380, + "end": 26401, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 26524, + "end": 26547, + "label": "CASENO" + } + ], + "136341809": [ + { + "start": 12, + "end": 25, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 46, + "end": 68, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 94, + "end": 104, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 112, + "end": 126, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 130, + "end": 143, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 165, + "end": 179, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 339, + "end": 349, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 493, + "end": 503, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 539, + "end": 570, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 607, + "end": 615, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 648, + "end": 667, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 738, + "end": 748, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 788, + "end": 798, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 849, + "end": 857, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 936, + "end": 1016, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 1092, + "end": 1100, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1124, + "end": 1158, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1207, + "end": 1217, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1276, + "end": 1284, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1302, + "end": 1312, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2213, + "end": 2243, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3122, + "end": 3132, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3550, + "end": 3560, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3593, + "end": 3605, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3938, + "end": 4025, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 4091, + "end": 4099, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 4173, + "end": 4181, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5052, + "end": 5146, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 5186, + "end": 5196, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5319, + "end": 5402, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 5407, + "end": 5553, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 5555, + "end": 5698, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 6186, + "end": 6196, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7083, + "end": 7095, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 7169, + "end": 7178, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7356, + "end": 7368, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 7712, + "end": 7724, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 8025, + "end": 8036, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 8214, + "end": 8226, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 8231, + "end": 8240, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8368, + "end": 8375, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8459, + "end": 8471, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 8865, + "end": 8873, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8892, + "end": 8904, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 9012, + "end": 9021, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9046, + "end": 9058, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 9730, + "end": 9741, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 10015, + "end": 10027, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 10245, + "end": 10257, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 10317, + "end": 10329, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 10345, + "end": 10354, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10529, + "end": 10540, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 10665, + "end": 10677, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 10956, + "end": 10968, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 11236, + "end": 11245, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11301, + "end": 11313, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 11537, + "end": 11549, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 12512, + "end": 12521, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12603, + "end": 12614, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 13188, + "end": 13200, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 13345, + "end": 13375, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15936, + "end": 15948, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16353, + "end": 16365, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 18035, + "end": 18046, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 18189, + "end": 18200, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 18275, + "end": 18287, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 18696, + "end": 18707, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 18915, + "end": 18926, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 19200, + "end": 19210, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 19332, + "end": 19344, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20144, + "end": 20210, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20855, + "end": 20928, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20933, + "end": 20984, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21341, + "end": 21371, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 21577, + "end": 21589, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 21684, + "end": 21696, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 23096, + "end": 23112, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 23371, + "end": 23381, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 23574, + "end": 23595, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 23788, + "end": 23806, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 24112, + "end": 24119, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 24131, + "end": 24139, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 24324, + "end": 24331, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 25322, + "end": 25334, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 26122, + "end": 26141, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 26157, + "end": 26188, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 26220, + "end": 26236, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "19436407": [ + { + "start": 100, + "end": 118, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 143, + "end": 164, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 212, + "end": 235, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 315, + "end": 338, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 388, + "end": 402, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 417, + "end": 430, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 442, + "end": 459, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 491, + "end": 501, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 517, + "end": 527, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 539, + "end": 554, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 566, + "end": 581, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 593, + "end": 607, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 624, + "end": 632, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 634, + "end": 642, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 644, + "end": 652, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 654, + "end": 662, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 664, + "end": 672, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 674, + "end": 682, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 684, + "end": 692, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 694, + "end": 702, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 704, + "end": 712, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 714, + "end": 722, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 724, + "end": 732, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 734, + "end": 742, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 744, + "end": 752, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 754, + "end": 762, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 764, + "end": 772, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 774, + "end": 782, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 784, + "end": 791, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 793, + "end": 801, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 803, + "end": 810, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 812, + "end": 820, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 822, + "end": 830, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 832, + "end": 839, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 841, + "end": 849, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 851, + "end": 859, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 861, + "end": 869, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 871, + "end": 878, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 883, + "end": 891, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 905, + "end": 915, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 917, + "end": 935, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 969, + "end": 989, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 994, + "end": 1014, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1086, + "end": 1099, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1136, + "end": 1152, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1195, + "end": 1215, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1255, + "end": 1276, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1357, + "end": 1386, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1500, + "end": 1506, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1538, + "end": 1544, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1821, + "end": 1827, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1897, + "end": 1916, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1917, + "end": 1936, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 1941, + "end": 1960, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 1995, + "end": 2015, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2265, + "end": 2271, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 2304, + "end": 2323, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 2328, + "end": 2347, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 2481, + "end": 2500, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 2505, + "end": 2524, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 2594, + "end": 2600, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 2658, + "end": 2674, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2785, + "end": 2791, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 2931, + "end": 2937, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 2974, + "end": 2985, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 2990, + "end": 3001, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 3122, + "end": 3128, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 3164, + "end": 3170, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 3192, + "end": 3203, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 3208, + "end": 3219, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 3435, + "end": 3448, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3455, + "end": 3475, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 3565, + "end": 3576, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 3581, + "end": 3592, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 3671, + "end": 3686, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3756, + "end": 3771, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3894, + "end": 3905, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 3910, + "end": 3921, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 4283, + "end": 4302, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 4327, + "end": 4340, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4348, + "end": 4369, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 4490, + "end": 4510, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 4819, + "end": 4825, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 5310, + "end": 5321, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 5341, + "end": 5358, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5394, + "end": 5413, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5491, + "end": 5497, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 5552, + "end": 5569, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5590, + "end": 5596, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 5690, + "end": 5711, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 5779, + "end": 5798, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 5802, + "end": 5819, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5899, + "end": 5918, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 5920, + "end": 5926, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 5957, + "end": 5976, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 6021, + "end": 6032, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 6061, + "end": 6076, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6113, + "end": 6119, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 6237, + "end": 6249, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6358, + "end": 6378, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 6419, + "end": 6427, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 6458, + "end": 6466, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 6560, + "end": 6568, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 6652, + "end": 6658, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 6793, + "end": 6801, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 6818, + "end": 6824, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 7163, + "end": 7171, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7196, + "end": 7202, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 7336, + "end": 7342, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 7584, + "end": 7590, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 7625, + "end": 7639, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 7647, + "end": 7664, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7669, + "end": 7684, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8073, + "end": 8090, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8109, + "end": 8121, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8155, + "end": 8162, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 8257, + "end": 8263, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 8361, + "end": 8367, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 8407, + "end": 8426, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 8468, + "end": 8485, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8528, + "end": 8549, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 8720, + "end": 8726, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 8852, + "end": 8877, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8991, + "end": 9008, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9135, + "end": 9162, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 9164, + "end": 9216, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9227, + "end": 9233, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 9365, + "end": 9392, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 9397, + "end": 9417, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 9653, + "end": 9673, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 9680, + "end": 9686, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 9721, + "end": 9738, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9751, + "end": 9767, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 9940, + "end": 9959, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9998, + "end": 10015, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10053, + "end": 10061, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10093, + "end": 10105, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10159, + "end": 10177, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10179, + "end": 10200, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10202, + "end": 10221, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10240, + "end": 10258, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10260, + "end": 10277, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10286, + "end": 10304, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10306, + "end": 10321, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10323, + "end": 10339, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10341, + "end": 10359, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10361, + "end": 10376, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10395, + "end": 10413, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10415, + "end": 10433, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10441, + "end": 10454, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10456, + "end": 10476, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10478, + "end": 10497, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10499, + "end": 10519, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10521, + "end": 10535, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10540, + "end": 10569, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10715, + "end": 10732, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11036, + "end": 11051, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11218, + "end": 11237, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 11284, + "end": 11296, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11338, + "end": 11354, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 12070, + "end": 12078, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12169, + "end": 12177, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12612, + "end": 12627, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12746, + "end": 12759, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 14970, + "end": 14999, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15481, + "end": 15501, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15785, + "end": 15798, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 15811, + "end": 15827, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 15832, + "end": 15846, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 17814, + "end": 17828, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 18119, + "end": 18135, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21503, + "end": 21521, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 21632, + "end": 21651, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 21666, + "end": 21685, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 22289, + "end": 22295, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 22812, + "end": 22825, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 22829, + "end": 22895, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 22924, + "end": 23010, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 23068, + "end": 23081, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 23101, + "end": 23110, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 23156, + "end": 23161, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 23258, + "end": 23263, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 23308, + "end": 23313, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24085, + "end": 24136, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24281, + "end": 24339, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24472, + "end": 24535, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 25727, + "end": 25732, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 25780, + "end": 25785, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 25798, + "end": 25807, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 25820, + "end": 25829, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26316, + "end": 26326, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 26473, + "end": 26486, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 27447, + "end": 27456, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 27516, + "end": 27521, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 28369, + "end": 28398, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 28796, + "end": 28805, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 29043, + "end": 29052, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 29387, + "end": 29398, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 30073, + "end": 30086, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 30090, + "end": 30178, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 30183, + "end": 30200, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 30205, + "end": 30234, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 30295, + "end": 30490, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 30545, + "end": 30637, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 31085, + "end": 31161, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 31391, + "end": 31420, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 32480, + "end": 32500, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 32507, + "end": 32525, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 32708, + "end": 32728, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 32735, + "end": 32753, + "label": "JUDGE" + } + ], + "1348961": [ + { + "start": 12, + "end": 43, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 61, + "end": 75, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 92, + "end": 102, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 110, + "end": 122, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 134, + "end": 146, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 151, + "end": 171, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 186, + "end": 199, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 200, + "end": 216, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 217, + "end": 232, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 233, + "end": 247, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 248, + "end": 265, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 283, + "end": 299, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 303, + "end": 318, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 322, + "end": 338, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 373, + "end": 386, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 542, + "end": 560, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 886, + "end": 899, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 989, + "end": 1002, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1028, + "end": 1044, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1453, + "end": 1466, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1572, + "end": 1585, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1800, + "end": 1815, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1821, + "end": 1834, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2282, + "end": 2304, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2591, + "end": 2604, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2729, + "end": 2745, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3306, + "end": 3328, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 4642, + "end": 4654, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4974, + "end": 4987, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5694, + "end": 5706, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7605, + "end": 7618, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 8331, + "end": 8394, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8403, + "end": 8471, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8473, + "end": 8547, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8652, + "end": 8718, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9033, + "end": 9061, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 9097, + "end": 9106, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9114, + "end": 9137, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9149, + "end": 9172, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 9174, + "end": 9183, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 9185, + "end": 9198, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 9200, + "end": 9212, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 9217, + "end": 9228, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 9248, + "end": 9262, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 9268, + "end": 9281, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 9283, + "end": 9297, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 9304, + "end": 9311, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 9313, + "end": 9327, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 9332, + "end": 9344, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 9503, + "end": 9516, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9525, + "end": 9548, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9620, + "end": 9639, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10336, + "end": 10353, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10368, + "end": 10381, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 10459, + "end": 10472, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 10839, + "end": 10852, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 10880, + "end": 10896, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11248, + "end": 11260, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11276, + "end": 11289, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 11370, + "end": 11383, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 11418, + "end": 11430, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11478, + "end": 11491, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 11614, + "end": 11627, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 11736, + "end": 11749, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 11790, + "end": 11803, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 11855, + "end": 11868, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12220, + "end": 12233, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 12284, + "end": 12298, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12398, + "end": 12420, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 12504, + "end": 12517, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 12910, + "end": 12929, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13084, + "end": 13108, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13303, + "end": 13316, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 13660, + "end": 13673, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 14421, + "end": 14446, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 14507, + "end": 14526, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15171, + "end": 15184, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 15570, + "end": 15583, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 15666, + "end": 15682, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 17581, + "end": 17595, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 19000, + "end": 19009, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 19176, + "end": 19185, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 19594, + "end": 19598, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 20394, + "end": 20399, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 20861, + "end": 20870, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 22272, + "end": 22284, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 22590, + "end": 22603, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 23505, + "end": 23528, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 24864, + "end": 24876, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 25529, + "end": 25541, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 28088, + "end": 28100, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 28104, + "end": 28178, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 29054, + "end": 29082, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 29119, + "end": 29190, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 32151, + "end": 32164, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 32514, + "end": 32522, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 32555, + "end": 32568, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 33084, + "end": 33097, + "label": "AUTH" + } + ], + "130196424": [ + { + "start": 105, + "end": 117, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 118, + "end": 142, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 143, + "end": 159, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 160, + "end": 177, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 193, + "end": 213, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 226, + "end": 250, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 251, + "end": 267, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 268, + "end": 284, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 293, + "end": 313, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 353, + "end": 366, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 377, + "end": 387, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 415, + "end": 428, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 439, + "end": 453, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 464, + "end": 488, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 494, + "end": 509, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 520, + "end": 536, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 547, + "end": 571, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 614, + "end": 633, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 644, + "end": 655, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 666, + "end": 679, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 694, + "end": 699, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 707, + "end": 722, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 753, + "end": 763, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 779, + "end": 789, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 790, + "end": 802, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 1243, + "end": 1263, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2027, + "end": 2057, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2291, + "end": 2332, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2334, + "end": 2339, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2476, + "end": 2489, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 3133, + "end": 3157, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3310, + "end": 3315, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3698, + "end": 3703, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 4022, + "end": 4048, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4081, + "end": 4113, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 4169, + "end": 4184, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4266, + "end": 4271, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 4336, + "end": 4349, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4351, + "end": 4356, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 4377, + "end": 4395, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4400, + "end": 4418, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4424, + "end": 4450, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4625, + "end": 4653, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 4909, + "end": 4914, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5146, + "end": 5151, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5426, + "end": 5439, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 5494, + "end": 5535, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5728, + "end": 5733, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 6080, + "end": 6085, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 6167, + "end": 6205, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6872, + "end": 6877, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 6926, + "end": 6954, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 7231, + "end": 7244, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7447, + "end": 7460, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8450, + "end": 8470, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8902, + "end": 8907, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9110, + "end": 9146, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9148, + "end": 9152, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9231, + "end": 9236, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9238, + "end": 9242, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9454, + "end": 9459, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9843, + "end": 9848, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9849, + "end": 9853, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 10324, + "end": 10329, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 10401, + "end": 10406, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 10995, + "end": 11000, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 11213, + "end": 11249, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 11251, + "end": 11255, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 11837, + "end": 11855, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12174, + "end": 12179, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 12319, + "end": 12324, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 12358, + "end": 12363, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 12594, + "end": 12599, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 12603, + "end": 12607, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 12738, + "end": 12743, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 12744, + "end": 12748, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 12905, + "end": 12910, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 13041, + "end": 13077, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 13259, + "end": 13264, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 13266, + "end": 13270, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 13325, + "end": 13340, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13346, + "end": 13372, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13378, + "end": 13391, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13432, + "end": 13437, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 13564, + "end": 13569, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 13652, + "end": 13657, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 13859, + "end": 13864, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 13866, + "end": 13870, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 14479, + "end": 14484, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 14486, + "end": 14490, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 14592, + "end": 14597, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 14599, + "end": 14603, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 14779, + "end": 14784, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 14786, + "end": 14790, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 15101, + "end": 15106, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 15397, + "end": 15415, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15515, + "end": 15520, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 16029, + "end": 16034, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 16041, + "end": 16045, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 16680, + "end": 16685, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 16687, + "end": 16691, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 16927, + "end": 16932, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 17133, + "end": 17138, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 17281, + "end": 17286, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 17579, + "end": 17584, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 17586, + "end": 17590, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 18022, + "end": 18041, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 18366, + "end": 18371, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 19709, + "end": 19714, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 19716, + "end": 19720, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 19904, + "end": 19909, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 21462, + "end": 21474, + "label": "JUDGE" + } + ], + "1063151": [ + { + "start": 12, + "end": 40, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 57, + "end": 74, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 105, + "end": 115, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 123, + "end": 145, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 153, + "end": 175, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 176, + "end": 191, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 192, + "end": 204, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 215, + "end": 226, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 227, + "end": 239, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 257, + "end": 273, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 276, + "end": 292, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1414, + "end": 1479, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 1526, + "end": 1545, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1595, + "end": 1623, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1671, + "end": 1686, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1695, + "end": 1705, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1733, + "end": 1743, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 1778, + "end": 1809, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1860, + "end": 1875, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1889, + "end": 1899, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1947, + "end": 1968, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1970, + "end": 1985, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 1987, + "end": 2002, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 2033, + "end": 2042, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 2044, + "end": 2054, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 2088, + "end": 2116, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2151, + "end": 2164, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 2195, + "end": 2201, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 2286, + "end": 2298, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2342, + "end": 2350, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 2494, + "end": 2504, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2584, + "end": 2588, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 2720, + "end": 2735, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3266, + "end": 3282, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3377, + "end": 3392, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3637, + "end": 3655, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3685, + "end": 3701, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3802, + "end": 3819, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3828, + "end": 3846, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3848, + "end": 3857, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 3859, + "end": 3868, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 3874, + "end": 3882, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 3945, + "end": 3968, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 3994, + "end": 4004, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4296, + "end": 4315, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4425, + "end": 4434, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 4436, + "end": 4445, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 4450, + "end": 4458, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 5022, + "end": 5038, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5086, + "end": 5097, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 5161, + "end": 5177, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5202, + "end": 5211, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 5213, + "end": 5222, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 5227, + "end": 5235, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 5375, + "end": 5393, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5461, + "end": 5469, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 5509, + "end": 5517, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 5629, + "end": 5643, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 5651, + "end": 5665, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5707, + "end": 5721, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5753, + "end": 5772, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5781, + "end": 5800, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5802, + "end": 5810, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 5893, + "end": 5904, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 5928, + "end": 5950, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 6119, + "end": 6133, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 6171, + "end": 6192, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 6202, + "end": 6210, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 6381, + "end": 6400, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6402, + "end": 6410, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 6547, + "end": 6565, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6691, + "end": 6709, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6771, + "end": 6787, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6816, + "end": 6830, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6870, + "end": 6889, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 6891, + "end": 6907, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 6912, + "end": 6926, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 7029, + "end": 7044, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7111, + "end": 7124, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7238, + "end": 7256, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7265, + "end": 7280, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7314, + "end": 7341, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 7362, + "end": 7377, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 7390, + "end": 7398, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 7496, + "end": 7506, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 7740, + "end": 7759, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7764, + "end": 7784, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 7809, + "end": 7827, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8281, + "end": 8291, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 8651, + "end": 8655, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 9171, + "end": 9186, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9398, + "end": 9409, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 9611, + "end": 9628, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9668, + "end": 9690, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 9714, + "end": 9733, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9955, + "end": 9965, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 9973, + "end": 9987, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 10022, + "end": 10037, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10277, + "end": 10288, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 10479, + "end": 10493, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10600, + "end": 10610, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 10698, + "end": 10712, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10722, + "end": 10732, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 10768, + "end": 10784, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10793, + "end": 10812, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10838, + "end": 10848, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 10936, + "end": 10946, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 11029, + "end": 11039, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 11134, + "end": 11147, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 11255, + "end": 11269, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12591, + "end": 12610, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12642, + "end": 12650, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 12686, + "end": 12704, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 13930, + "end": 13948, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 14609, + "end": 14655, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 14960, + "end": 14978, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 16047, + "end": 16081, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16626, + "end": 16661, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 17478, + "end": 17491, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 18297, + "end": 18305, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 18539, + "end": 18547, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 18639, + "end": 18658, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 18732, + "end": 18773, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 18815, + "end": 18824, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 18829, + "end": 18838, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 18906, + "end": 18914, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 18984, + "end": 18992, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 19063, + "end": 19067, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 19121, + "end": 19129, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 19482, + "end": 19490, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 19699, + "end": 19717, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 19906, + "end": 19915, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 19921, + "end": 19986, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21197, + "end": 21206, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 21995, + "end": 22003, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 22080, + "end": 22098, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 22626, + "end": 22642, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 22745, + "end": 22758, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 22837, + "end": 22848, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + } + ], + "47053425": [ + { + "start": 76, + "end": 120, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 135, + "end": 155, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 186, + "end": 196, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 223, + "end": 240, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 241, + "end": 259, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 302, + "end": 312, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 355, + "end": 367, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 421, + "end": 431, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 839, + "end": 849, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 860, + "end": 888, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1242, + "end": 1252, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 1279, + "end": 1289, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1472, + "end": 1482, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1517, + "end": 1530, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1535, + "end": 1548, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1607, + "end": 1620, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1625, + "end": 1638, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1848, + "end": 1861, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1866, + "end": 1879, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 2408, + "end": 2418, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2435, + "end": 2448, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 2453, + "end": 2466, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 2606, + "end": 2616, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2926, + "end": 2939, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 3016, + "end": 3029, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 3479, + "end": 3489, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4111, + "end": 4121, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4132, + "end": 4150, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 4339, + "end": 4349, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4731, + "end": 4741, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4803, + "end": 4813, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4935, + "end": 4945, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4950, + "end": 4960, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5157, + "end": 5179, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 5349, + "end": 5359, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5375, + "end": 5388, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 5393, + "end": 5406, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 5469, + "end": 5481, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5509, + "end": 5522, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 5640, + "end": 5657, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 5703, + "end": 5711, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 6487, + "end": 6497, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10684, + "end": 10778, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10786, + "end": 10796, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11349, + "end": 11359, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11546, + "end": 11608, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 11811, + "end": 11828, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12222, + "end": 12296, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12568, + "end": 12578, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 12594, + "end": 12649, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12654, + "end": 12741, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12875, + "end": 12929, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12934, + "end": 13006, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 13072, + "end": 13079, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 13086, + "end": 13099, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 13594, + "end": 13632, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 13713, + "end": 13723, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 13739, + "end": 13765, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17302, + "end": 17312, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21974, + "end": 21991, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 22044, + "end": 22057, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 22061, + "end": 22134, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 23514, + "end": 23534, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 23832, + "end": 23842, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 23962, + "end": 23982, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 24034, + "end": 24046, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24466, + "end": 24478, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24733, + "end": 24759, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 27653, + "end": 27709, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 27715, + "end": 27725, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 27893, + "end": 27903, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 28028, + "end": 28054, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 28482, + "end": 28492, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 28624, + "end": 28644, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 28662, + "end": 28672, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 28715, + "end": 28725, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 28835, + "end": 28845, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 28915, + "end": 28925, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 29138, + "end": 29158, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 29673, + "end": 29705, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 29746, + "end": 29755, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 29942, + "end": 29952, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 30177, + "end": 30187, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 30222, + "end": 30232, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 30257, + "end": 30268, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 30334, + "end": 30344, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 30346, + "end": 30357, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 30398, + "end": 30408, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 30545, + "end": 30555, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 30624, + "end": 30634, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 30935, + "end": 30945, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 31150, + "end": 31161, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 31180, + "end": 31190, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 31265, + "end": 31275, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 31277, + "end": 31288, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 31328, + "end": 31338, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 31394, + "end": 31403, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 31598, + "end": 31671, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 31694, + "end": 31704, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 31765, + "end": 31775, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 31832, + "end": 31842, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 31849, + "end": 31854, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 31873, + "end": 31884, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 31912, + "end": 31922, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 32216, + "end": 32226, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 32703, + "end": 32723, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 33375, + "end": 33469, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 33860, + "end": 33872, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 34511, + "end": 34531, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 36122, + "end": 36131, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 36144, + "end": 36156, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 36188, + "end": 36198, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 37254, + "end": 37264, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 37652, + "end": 37662, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 37856, + "end": 37866, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 38480, + "end": 38490, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 38534, + "end": 38544, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 38660, + "end": 38670, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 39962, + "end": 40026, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 40033, + "end": 40042, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 41305, + "end": 41370, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 41376, + "end": 41389, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 42596, + "end": 42607, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 44484, + "end": 44578, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 45125, + "end": 45135, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 45333, + "end": 45343, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 46603, + "end": 46613, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 46891, + "end": 46903, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 48521, + "end": 48531, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 48756, + "end": 48780, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "114254342": [ + { + "start": 2, + "end": 19, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 65, + "end": 92, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 93, + "end": 109, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 233, + "end": 241, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 273, + "end": 284, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 320, + "end": 338, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 395, + "end": 404, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 436, + "end": 447, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 685, + "end": 695, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 794, + "end": 832, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 971, + "end": 981, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1016, + "end": 1026, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2075, + "end": 2092, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 3399, + "end": 3423, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3810, + "end": 3820, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3828, + "end": 3838, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3840, + "end": 3850, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 3934, + "end": 3955, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4061, + "end": 4099, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 4176, + "end": 4193, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 5490, + "end": 5544, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5731, + "end": 5785, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6349, + "end": 6366, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 6439, + "end": 6460, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6847, + "end": 6857, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6896, + "end": 6906, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6983, + "end": 6993, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7063, + "end": 7074, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 7332, + "end": 7342, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7390, + "end": 7400, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7642, + "end": 7652, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7745, + "end": 7755, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7821, + "end": 7831, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8079, + "end": 8089, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8162, + "end": 8172, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8255, + "end": 8265, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8413, + "end": 8430, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 8715, + "end": 8725, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8847, + "end": 8857, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9234, + "end": 9242, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 9610, + "end": 9620, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9728, + "end": 9738, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10414, + "end": 10424, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10508, + "end": 10525, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 10673, + "end": 10745, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10750, + "end": 10785, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10787, + "end": 10810, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 10822, + "end": 10831, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11364, + "end": 11454, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 11905, + "end": 11914, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 12026, + "end": 12047, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12293, + "end": 12303, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12330, + "end": 12341, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 12539, + "end": 12549, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12693, + "end": 12710, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 12752, + "end": 12762, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12861, + "end": 12871, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12898, + "end": 12908, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 13500, + "end": 13510, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 13626, + "end": 13636, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 14556, + "end": 14566, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 14653, + "end": 14663, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 14907, + "end": 14931, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 14965, + "end": 14982, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 15316, + "end": 15378, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15405, + "end": 15415, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15755, + "end": 15776, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16060, + "end": 16081, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16466, + "end": 16476, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 16879, + "end": 16896, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 17033, + "end": 17043, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 17937, + "end": 17950, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 17967, + "end": 18046, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18874, + "end": 18891, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 19130, + "end": 19140, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 19175, + "end": 19185, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 19310, + "end": 19320, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 19632, + "end": 19642, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 19749, + "end": 19759, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 19842, + "end": 19852, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 20157, + "end": 20170, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21047, + "end": 21064, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 21106, + "end": 21119, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 21135, + "end": 21202, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21253, + "end": 21266, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21434, + "end": 21486, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 22065, + "end": 22078, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 22082, + "end": 22151, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 22154, + "end": 22227, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 22286, + "end": 22375, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 23159, + "end": 23176, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 23523, + "end": 23533, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 23587, + "end": 23597, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 23692, + "end": 23702, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 23823, + "end": 23833, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 23981, + "end": 23991, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 24093, + "end": 24103, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 24250, + "end": 24260, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 24535, + "end": 24545, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 24606, + "end": 24616, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 24654, + "end": 24664, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 25183, + "end": 25193, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 25220, + "end": 25231, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 25277, + "end": 25294, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 25295, + "end": 25305, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 25659, + "end": 25669, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 25772, + "end": 25796, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 25814, + "end": 25821, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 26244, + "end": 26251, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 26300, + "end": 26317, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 26333, + "end": 26382, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 27724, + "end": 27741, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 27763, + "end": 27780, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 27781, + "end": 27843, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 28367, + "end": 28377, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 28420, + "end": 28430, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 28548, + "end": 28558, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 28761, + "end": 28768, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 29870, + "end": 29887, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 29907, + "end": 29920, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 29936, + "end": 29998, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 31086, + "end": 31099, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 31115, + "end": 31184, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 31853, + "end": 31874, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 32149, + "end": 32156, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 32232, + "end": 32249, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 32443, + "end": 32453, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 32573, + "end": 32583, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 32591, + "end": 32601, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "13024806": [ + { + "start": 176, + "end": 213, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 256, + "end": 279, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 313, + "end": 329, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 815, + "end": 840, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 1044, + "end": 1054, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1145, + "end": 1154, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1201, + "end": 1211, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2287, + "end": 2297, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2495, + "end": 2513, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2652, + "end": 2669, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2671, + "end": 2674, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2787, + "end": 2819, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2832, + "end": 2836, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2868, + "end": 2878, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2897, + "end": 2901, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2910, + "end": 2921, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4018, + "end": 4034, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5092, + "end": 5096, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5385, + "end": 5421, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 5427, + "end": 5462, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 5664, + "end": 5688, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 5991, + "end": 6018, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 6090, + "end": 6094, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 6098, + "end": 6117, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 6121, + "end": 6131, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6479, + "end": 6532, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6534, + "end": 6539, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6636, + "end": 6645, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6945, + "end": 6971, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 6984, + "end": 7012, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7107, + "end": 7110, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7304, + "end": 7335, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7342, + "end": 7362, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7454, + "end": 7457, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7482, + "end": 7514, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7517, + "end": 7523, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8205, + "end": 8224, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 8237, + "end": 8247, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8258, + "end": 8283, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8286, + "end": 8290, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 8291, + "end": 8307, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 8321, + "end": 8331, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8342, + "end": 8352, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8782, + "end": 8796, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8810, + "end": 8827, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9028, + "end": 9048, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9470, + "end": 9506, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9526, + "end": 9548, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9554, + "end": 9559, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9734, + "end": 9771, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9779, + "end": 9796, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9802, + "end": 9807, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9897, + "end": 9926, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9933, + "end": 9958, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10040, + "end": 10043, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10102, + "end": 10144, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10237, + "end": 10242, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10305, + "end": 10309, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 10310, + "end": 10324, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 10337, + "end": 10347, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10350, + "end": 10354, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 10364, + "end": 10373, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10408, + "end": 10418, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10426, + "end": 10445, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10481, + "end": 10491, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10503, + "end": 10520, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10555, + "end": 10565, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10580, + "end": 10605, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10742, + "end": 10772, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10783, + "end": 10803, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 10944, + "end": 10947, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10970, + "end": 10976, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11476, + "end": 11486, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 11772, + "end": 11785, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 11801, + "end": 11823, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 11844, + "end": 11895, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12662, + "end": 12672, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12686, + "end": 12696, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12711, + "end": 12740, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 12908, + "end": 12926, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 13055, + "end": 13065, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 13071, + "end": 13082, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 14190, + "end": 14201, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14211, + "end": 14222, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14232, + "end": 14263, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14270, + "end": 14285, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15227, + "end": 15231, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17303, + "end": 17328, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 17805, + "end": 17815, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 22188, + "end": 22215, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 24929, + "end": 24965, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 25640, + "end": 25675, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 25783, + "end": 25787, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 25974, + "end": 25986, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 25988, + "end": 25998, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26669, + "end": 26680, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26685, + "end": 26696, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26814, + "end": 26838, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 28314, + "end": 28341, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 28359, + "end": 28369, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 29211, + "end": 29222, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 29231, + "end": 29241, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 29479, + "end": 29482, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 29611, + "end": 29614, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 29659, + "end": 29662, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 30081, + "end": 30107, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 30201, + "end": 30206, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 30393, + "end": 30397, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 30398, + "end": 30413, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 32383, + "end": 32396, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 34634, + "end": 34647, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 34724, + "end": 34772, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 34857, + "end": 34905, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 35096, + "end": 35113, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 35133, + "end": 35149, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 35401, + "end": 35439, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 35447, + "end": 35462, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 36217, + "end": 36239, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 36623, + "end": 36628, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 36658, + "end": 36677, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 36755, + "end": 36770, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 36801, + "end": 36806, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 36810, + "end": 36826, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 36863, + "end": 36898, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 36901, + "end": 36939, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 36976, + "end": 37003, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 37005, + "end": 37010, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 37100, + "end": 37148, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 37646, + "end": 37669, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 37674, + "end": 37687, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 38213, + "end": 38242, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 38248, + "end": 38254, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 38263, + "end": 38314, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 38964, + "end": 38985, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 39124, + "end": 39136, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 39467, + "end": 39506, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 39525, + "end": 39533, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 39567, + "end": 39580, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 39878, + "end": 39916, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 41584, + "end": 41622, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 41773, + "end": 41803, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 47470, + "end": 47495, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 48369, + "end": 48394, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 49232, + "end": 49242, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 50755, + "end": 50771, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 50826, + "end": 50842, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 50855, + "end": 50869, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "16717267": [ + { + "start": 20, + "end": 42, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 113, + "end": 114, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 335, + "end": 347, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 421, + "end": 431, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 479, + "end": 497, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 532, + "end": 550, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 659, + "end": 669, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 894, + "end": 908, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 1099, + "end": 1117, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 1351, + "end": 1369, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 1398, + "end": 1408, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1413, + "end": 1423, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1562, + "end": 1572, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1979, + "end": 1989, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2133, + "end": 2152, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2205, + "end": 2279, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 2435, + "end": 2445, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2473, + "end": 2476, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2592, + "end": 2602, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2603, + "end": 2622, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2894, + "end": 2897, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2906, + "end": 2931, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2971, + "end": 2981, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3123, + "end": 3133, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3278, + "end": 3288, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3341, + "end": 3364, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4193, + "end": 4203, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4371, + "end": 4381, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4432, + "end": 4442, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4720, + "end": 4730, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4755, + "end": 4758, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4788, + "end": 4862, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 5077, + "end": 5080, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5184, + "end": 5202, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 5241, + "end": 5259, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 5641, + "end": 5653, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 5957, + "end": 5965, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6119, + "end": 6129, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6378, + "end": 6388, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6627, + "end": 6632, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 6838, + "end": 6841, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7200, + "end": 7203, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7208, + "end": 7224, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 7262, + "end": 7272, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7339, + "end": 7342, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7592, + "end": 7664, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8064, + "end": 8097, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 8099, + "end": 8159, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8195, + "end": 8218, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8244, + "end": 8257, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8327, + "end": 8337, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8481, + "end": 8494, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9424, + "end": 9442, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 9908, + "end": 9925, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9957, + "end": 9974, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10019, + "end": 10029, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11610, + "end": 11637, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 12029, + "end": 12039, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 12047, + "end": 12060, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 12146, + "end": 12158, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12888, + "end": 12921, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 12983, + "end": 12993, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 13024, + "end": 13057, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 13295, + "end": 13313, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 13347, + "end": 13384, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15092, + "end": 15125, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 15357, + "end": 15373, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 15426, + "end": 15442, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "1304109": [ + { + "start": 106, + "end": 141, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 168, + "end": 184, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 213, + "end": 223, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 306, + "end": 315, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 355, + "end": 376, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 383, + "end": 393, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 443, + "end": 466, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 469, + "end": 472, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 550, + "end": 553, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 674, + "end": 693, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 765, + "end": 775, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 844, + "end": 854, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1650, + "end": 1660, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1805, + "end": 1815, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2728, + "end": 2738, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4553, + "end": 4585, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4588, + "end": 4592, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5192, + "end": 5196, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5200, + "end": 5210, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5950, + "end": 5960, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6142, + "end": 6145, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6683, + "end": 6686, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7228, + "end": 7231, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7285, + "end": 7295, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7609, + "end": 7619, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7943, + "end": 7946, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8180, + "end": 8183, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8422, + "end": 8432, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8606, + "end": 8609, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8644, + "end": 8654, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8903, + "end": 8936, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9368, + "end": 9371, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9506, + "end": 9509, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9913, + "end": 9916, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11491, + "end": 11494, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12187, + "end": 12210, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12216, + "end": 12239, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12446, + "end": 12503, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 13541, + "end": 13544, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13607, + "end": 13610, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13635, + "end": 13660, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13730, + "end": 13733, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13933, + "end": 14002, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14229, + "end": 14232, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 14528, + "end": 14542, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14761, + "end": 14775, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16301, + "end": 16304, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16640, + "end": 16643, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16961, + "end": 17002, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18419, + "end": 18435, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 18910, + "end": 18913, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20296, + "end": 20324, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20330, + "end": 20370, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21151, + "end": 21167, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 21169, + "end": 21185, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 21586, + "end": 21589, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 21849, + "end": 21860, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 21879, + "end": 21894, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 21915, + "end": 21925, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 21945, + "end": 21955, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "26913217": [ + { + "start": 20, + "end": 42, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 106, + "end": 120, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 149, + "end": 159, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 191, + "end": 205, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 274, + "end": 283, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 291, + "end": 307, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 311, + "end": 330, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 561, + "end": 571, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 658, + "end": 668, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1323, + "end": 1339, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1459, + "end": 1469, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1484, + "end": 1507, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1523, + "end": 1551, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1571, + "end": 1584, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1885, + "end": 1898, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1932, + "end": 1941, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1977, + "end": 1986, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2108, + "end": 2117, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2160, + "end": 2169, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2212, + "end": 2222, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2274, + "end": 2283, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2304, + "end": 2317, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2361, + "end": 2370, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2420, + "end": 2436, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2543, + "end": 2552, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2662, + "end": 2671, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2693, + "end": 2712, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2779, + "end": 2789, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2901, + "end": 2914, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3085, + "end": 3095, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3209, + "end": 3224, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 3309, + "end": 3321, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 3472, + "end": 3482, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3505, + "end": 3515, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3634, + "end": 3653, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 3916, + "end": 3924, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4006, + "end": 4019, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4061, + "end": 4070, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4222, + "end": 4231, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4257, + "end": 4266, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4575, + "end": 4585, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4740, + "end": 4749, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4801, + "end": 4810, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4945, + "end": 4954, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5008, + "end": 5017, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5071, + "end": 5081, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5144, + "end": 5153, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5195, + "end": 5205, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5246, + "end": 5256, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5802, + "end": 5846, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 5891, + "end": 5904, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 6619, + "end": 6639, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7313, + "end": 7333, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7390, + "end": 7407, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 7980, + "end": 8019, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8025, + "end": 8067, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8120, + "end": 8155, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8231, + "end": 8243, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 8355, + "end": 8364, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8438, + "end": 8447, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8459, + "end": 8469, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8796, + "end": 8805, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8878, + "end": 8888, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9190, + "end": 9212, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 9216, + "end": 9232, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 9973, + "end": 9983, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10010, + "end": 10019, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10101, + "end": 10109, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10324, + "end": 10337, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 10582, + "end": 10597, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 11500, + "end": 11510, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 11651, + "end": 11661, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 11798, + "end": 11814, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 11867, + "end": 11885, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "160214": [ + { + "start": 70, + "end": 99, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 116, + "end": 143, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 145, + "end": 170, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 191, + "end": 218, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 347, + "end": 394, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 468, + "end": 523, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 625, + "end": 635, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 670, + "end": 691, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 708, + "end": 746, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 789, + "end": 799, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 854, + "end": 874, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1135, + "end": 1144, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2612, + "end": 2622, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2713, + "end": 2723, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3020, + "end": 3041, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 3047, + "end": 3055, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3088, + "end": 3109, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 3193, + "end": 3202, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3291, + "end": 3346, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3439, + "end": 3475, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3518, + "end": 3565, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3745, + "end": 3772, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 3869, + "end": 3924, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4153, + "end": 4208, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4250, + "end": 4267, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4309, + "end": 4323, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4474, + "end": 4495, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5253, + "end": 5263, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5646, + "end": 5656, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5775, + "end": 5801, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7679, + "end": 7689, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7701, + "end": 7719, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7795, + "end": 7805, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7869, + "end": 7879, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 8292, + "end": 8316, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8970, + "end": 8975, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 9054, + "end": 9154, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9159, + "end": 9264, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9273, + "end": 9290, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 15231, + "end": 15248, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15346, + "end": 15378, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15395, + "end": 15407, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 15463, + "end": 15475, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 16124, + "end": 16136, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 17967, + "end": 17979, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 18126, + "end": 18138, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 18332, + "end": 18364, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18427, + "end": 18439, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 18693, + "end": 18726, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 19002, + "end": 19026, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 19735, + "end": 19747, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19917, + "end": 19930, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 22727, + "end": 22768, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 22896, + "end": 22973, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 22978, + "end": 23070, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 23387, + "end": 23399, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 24479, + "end": 24544, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26007, + "end": 26073, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26077, + "end": 26103, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26485, + "end": 26565, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 28477, + "end": 28489, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 30267, + "end": 30312, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 30620, + "end": 30639, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 30656, + "end": 30715, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 30977, + "end": 31104, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 31250, + "end": 31268, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 31321, + "end": 31338, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 32234, + "end": 32252, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 32410, + "end": 32420, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 33128, + "end": 33138, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 34205, + "end": 34256, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 35171, + "end": 35219, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 35228, + "end": 35316, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 37471, + "end": 37476, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 38069, + "end": 38079, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 38117, + "end": 38131, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 38144, + "end": 38156, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "90856652": [ + { + "start": 18, + "end": 40, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 70, + "end": 98, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 115, + "end": 158, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 165, + "end": 180, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 288, + "end": 301, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 328, + "end": 346, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 434, + "end": 444, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 594, + "end": 604, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 624, + "end": 640, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 713, + "end": 729, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 1011, + "end": 1021, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1145, + "end": 1155, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1373, + "end": 1390, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1419, + "end": 1436, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1531, + "end": 1540, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1706, + "end": 1724, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1979, + "end": 1989, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2498, + "end": 2516, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2521, + "end": 2538, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2585, + "end": 2588, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3794, + "end": 3797, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4825, + "end": 4835, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5065, + "end": 5068, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5241, + "end": 5271, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5777, + "end": 5807, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6092, + "end": 6102, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6195, + "end": 6205, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6297, + "end": 6307, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7012, + "end": 7034, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7324, + "end": 7334, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8430, + "end": 8440, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8537, + "end": 8547, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9148, + "end": 9158, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9543, + "end": 9553, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 10472, + "end": 10494, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10902, + "end": 10924, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12285, + "end": 12295, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 12537, + "end": 12547, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 12682, + "end": 12692, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 13454, + "end": 13464, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 13632, + "end": 13684, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 13880, + "end": 13923, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14087, + "end": 14113, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 14961, + "end": 15062, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15833, + "end": 15843, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 16004, + "end": 16016, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 16050, + "end": 16068, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 16070, + "end": 16083, + "label": "DATE" + } + ] + }, + "fold_2": { + "184861797": [ + { + "start": 103, + "end": 125, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 126, + "end": 143, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 148, + "end": 177, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 182, + "end": 202, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 237, + "end": 242, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 305, + "end": 321, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 327, + "end": 335, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 369, + "end": 379, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 394, + "end": 404, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 405, + "end": 427, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 475, + "end": 496, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 519, + "end": 548, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 589, + "end": 603, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 626, + "end": 655, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 657, + "end": 686, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 704, + "end": 731, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 947, + "end": 961, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1053, + "end": 1078, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1144, + "end": 1171, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1210, + "end": 1224, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1268, + "end": 1297, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1316, + "end": 1333, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1466, + "end": 1495, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1533, + "end": 1550, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1627, + "end": 1648, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1655, + "end": 1676, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1696, + "end": 1713, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1773, + "end": 1801, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1835, + "end": 1852, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2039, + "end": 2053, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2084, + "end": 2102, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2467, + "end": 2496, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 2573, + "end": 2594, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2678, + "end": 2689, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 3022, + "end": 3044, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 3292, + "end": 3310, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 3374, + "end": 3379, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 3463, + "end": 3485, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 3489, + "end": 3514, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3576, + "end": 3601, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3626, + "end": 3631, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 4000, + "end": 4005, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 4130, + "end": 4170, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4447, + "end": 4452, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 4817, + "end": 4833, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5184, + "end": 5189, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 5285, + "end": 5314, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 5751, + "end": 5848, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 5854, + "end": 5859, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 6182, + "end": 6203, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6224, + "end": 6234, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6245, + "end": 6264, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 6270, + "end": 6339, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 6358, + "end": 6368, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6379, + "end": 6394, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 6399, + "end": 6446, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 6465, + "end": 6475, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6486, + "end": 6504, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 6506, + "end": 6556, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 6578, + "end": 6588, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6619, + "end": 6685, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 6691, + "end": 6702, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 6807, + "end": 6812, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 6831, + "end": 6842, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 7552, + "end": 7570, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 7790, + "end": 7812, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7828, + "end": 7934, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7940, + "end": 7951, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 8035, + "end": 8127, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8132, + "end": 8226, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8613, + "end": 8663, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9047, + "end": 9072, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9280, + "end": 9295, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9826, + "end": 9855, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 10520, + "end": 10536, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 11773, + "end": 11779, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12114, + "end": 12143, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 12258, + "end": 12276, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 12540, + "end": 12563, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 12675, + "end": 12697, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 12780, + "end": 12809, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 12843, + "end": 12861, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 12960, + "end": 12983, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 13142, + "end": 13171, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 13251, + "end": 13273, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 13494, + "end": 13511, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14533, + "end": 14555, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 14628, + "end": 14646, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 14753, + "end": 14774, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 14858, + "end": 14883, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 14978, + "end": 15003, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15143, + "end": 15159, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15458, + "end": 15476, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 15707, + "end": 15732, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 16384, + "end": 16401, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16456, + "end": 16477, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16592, + "end": 16604, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16782, + "end": 16811, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 16820, + "end": 16838, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 17152, + "end": 17157, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 17174, + "end": 17185, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17211, + "end": 17240, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 17373, + "end": 17390, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17416, + "end": 17445, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 17714, + "end": 17736, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17795, + "end": 17808, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17899, + "end": 17928, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 17979, + "end": 17998, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18741, + "end": 18763, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18958, + "end": 18963, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 19185, + "end": 19206, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 19208, + "end": 19229, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 19397, + "end": 19419, + "label": "JUDGE" + } + ], + "51061623": [ + { + "start": 100, + "end": 111, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 143, + "end": 160, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 324, + "end": 343, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 360, + "end": 397, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 721, + "end": 731, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 896, + "end": 921, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1493, + "end": 1503, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1986, + "end": 1996, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2146, + "end": 2161, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2393, + "end": 2440, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2470, + "end": 2495, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2671, + "end": 2681, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2719, + "end": 2729, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2848, + "end": 2873, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2979, + "end": 3014, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 3457, + "end": 3467, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3598, + "end": 3608, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3881, + "end": 3891, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4018, + "end": 4028, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4176, + "end": 4186, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4276, + "end": 4301, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4414, + "end": 4424, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4481, + "end": 4491, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 4565, + "end": 4578, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 4646, + "end": 4656, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 4838, + "end": 4848, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4899, + "end": 4924, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4962, + "end": 4972, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5181, + "end": 5191, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5683, + "end": 5693, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6262, + "end": 6287, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6301, + "end": 6311, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6549, + "end": 6559, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6850, + "end": 6875, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7490, + "end": 7500, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7504, + "end": 7514, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7524, + "end": 7534, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7685, + "end": 7695, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8003, + "end": 8013, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8090, + "end": 8103, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 8240, + "end": 8250, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8338, + "end": 8348, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8476, + "end": 8486, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8927, + "end": 8937, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9080, + "end": 9090, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9184, + "end": 9194, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9380, + "end": 9390, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10105, + "end": 10115, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10307, + "end": 10332, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10406, + "end": 10416, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10467, + "end": 10477, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10579, + "end": 10589, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10717, + "end": 10727, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11036, + "end": 11046, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11101, + "end": 11126, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11305, + "end": 11332, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 17336, + "end": 17346, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 17605, + "end": 17630, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17709, + "end": 17719, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 18314, + "end": 18324, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 18510, + "end": 18520, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 18599, + "end": 18609, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 19238, + "end": 19248, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 19521, + "end": 19531, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 19588, + "end": 19598, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 20532, + "end": 20542, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 20589, + "end": 20599, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 20876, + "end": 20886, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21451, + "end": 21467, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "76640285": [ + { + "start": 18, + "end": 41, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 152, + "end": 168, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 171, + "end": 176, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 207, + "end": 221, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 254, + "end": 268, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 352, + "end": 362, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 377, + "end": 396, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 400, + "end": 439, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 490, + "end": 516, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 546, + "end": 550, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 592, + "end": 602, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 711, + "end": 728, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 758, + "end": 761, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 769, + "end": 779, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 885, + "end": 895, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1035, + "end": 1043, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1107, + "end": 1115, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1229, + "end": 1263, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1362, + "end": 1402, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1740, + "end": 1743, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1915, + "end": 1923, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2066, + "end": 2069, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2423, + "end": 2439, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2476, + "end": 2484, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2534, + "end": 2544, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3270, + "end": 3313, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 3868, + "end": 3967, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 4049, + "end": 4052, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4057, + "end": 4105, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 4127, + "end": 4140, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5906, + "end": 5914, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6006, + "end": 6014, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6151, + "end": 6164, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 6545, + "end": 6555, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7120, + "end": 7128, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7538, + "end": 7549, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7670, + "end": 7677, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7682, + "end": 7727, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8542, + "end": 8545, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9005, + "end": 9008, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9123, + "end": 9170, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9866, + "end": 9886, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 10393, + "end": 10433, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10613, + "end": 10616, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10772, + "end": 10775, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11201, + "end": 11250, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 11372, + "end": 11375, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 14202, + "end": 14246, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14382, + "end": 14415, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14513, + "end": 14523, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 15804, + "end": 15842, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16365, + "end": 16368, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17046, + "end": 17054, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 18645, + "end": 18653, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 18745, + "end": 18753, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 19803, + "end": 19813, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 19828, + "end": 19847, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19875, + "end": 19897, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 19982, + "end": 19985, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20077, + "end": 20092, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 20131, + "end": 20145, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 20158, + "end": 20177, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "1680408": [ + { + "start": 10, + "end": 36, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 49, + "end": 65, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 84, + "end": 98, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 123, + "end": 133, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 141, + "end": 151, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 154, + "end": 169, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 217, + "end": 248, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 250, + "end": 277, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 294, + "end": 325, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 327, + "end": 337, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 362, + "end": 378, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 443, + "end": 453, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 497, + "end": 507, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 511, + "end": 549, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 631, + "end": 641, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 645, + "end": 692, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 747, + "end": 768, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 774, + "end": 790, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1441, + "end": 1451, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1453, + "end": 1463, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1468, + "end": 1477, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1542, + "end": 1549, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1643, + "end": 1661, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2332, + "end": 2342, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2447, + "end": 2462, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2554, + "end": 2571, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4225, + "end": 4232, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4475, + "end": 4485, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4533, + "end": 4543, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4721, + "end": 4730, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4764, + "end": 4795, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 4986, + "end": 4996, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5000, + "end": 5009, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5108, + "end": 5118, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5167, + "end": 5177, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5357, + "end": 5367, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5912, + "end": 5938, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 6209, + "end": 6216, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6236, + "end": 6243, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6331, + "end": 6338, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6358, + "end": 6365, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7111, + "end": 7121, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7678, + "end": 7771, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8192, + "end": 8223, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 8488, + "end": 8501, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 8587, + "end": 8597, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8841, + "end": 8869, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9251, + "end": 9270, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9302, + "end": 9313, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 9527, + "end": 9537, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9833, + "end": 9854, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9891, + "end": 9907, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10009, + "end": 10035, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10473, + "end": 10489, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 12727, + "end": 12737, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 14008, + "end": 14018, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 14150, + "end": 14166, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 14195, + "end": 14205, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 14842, + "end": 14858, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15132, + "end": 15158, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17205, + "end": 17231, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17442, + "end": 17478, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17694, + "end": 17710, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 17784, + "end": 17794, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19078, + "end": 19088, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19924, + "end": 19934, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 20077, + "end": 20098, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21170, + "end": 21210, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21977, + "end": 21984, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 22032, + "end": 22088, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 22351, + "end": 22361, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 22414, + "end": 22421, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 22426, + "end": 22431, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 22454, + "end": 22461, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 22508, + "end": 22513, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 22655, + "end": 22663, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 22665, + "end": 22679, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 22811, + "end": 22815, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 22837, + "end": 22851, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 23724, + "end": 23760, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 23762, + "end": 23793, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24112, + "end": 24140, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24235, + "end": 24246, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24460, + "end": 24470, + "label": "COURT" + } + ], + "1405647": [ + { + "start": 3, + "end": 13, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 14, + "end": 31, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 55, + "end": 72, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 77, + "end": 91, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 107, + "end": 128, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 134, + "end": 145, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 151, + "end": 166, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 172, + "end": 185, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 212, + "end": 225, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 231, + "end": 252, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 258, + "end": 272, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 284, + "end": 298, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 500, + "end": 524, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 617, + "end": 646, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 892, + "end": 908, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 981, + "end": 995, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1422, + "end": 1439, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2575, + "end": 2596, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2996, + "end": 3091, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 3612, + "end": 3638, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4299, + "end": 4326, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4786, + "end": 4804, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5367, + "end": 5391, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5991, + "end": 6004, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6019, + "end": 6048, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6090, + "end": 6102, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 6107, + "end": 6121, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 6254, + "end": 6267, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6287, + "end": 6305, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6343, + "end": 6357, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 6373, + "end": 6385, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 6528, + "end": 6555, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 6600, + "end": 6613, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6624, + "end": 6643, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 6645, + "end": 6686, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 6716, + "end": 6729, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6749, + "end": 6761, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6817, + "end": 6858, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 6958, + "end": 6971, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7035, + "end": 7048, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7188, + "end": 7198, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7212, + "end": 7239, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7273, + "end": 7285, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7310, + "end": 7339, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7365, + "end": 7378, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7410, + "end": 7426, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 8186, + "end": 8199, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8259, + "end": 8272, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8417, + "end": 8430, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8436, + "end": 8465, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8594, + "end": 8621, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8783, + "end": 8793, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8807, + "end": 8834, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8997, + "end": 9021, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9326, + "end": 9355, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 10054, + "end": 10083, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 10087, + "end": 10099, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10283, + "end": 10304, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10820, + "end": 10841, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11641, + "end": 11667, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 14651, + "end": 14672, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16312, + "end": 16333, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16693, + "end": 16717, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 16814, + "end": 16835, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16977, + "end": 16997, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17187, + "end": 17211, + "label": "JUDGE" + } + ], + "58138931": [ + { + "start": 58, + "end": 76, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 95, + "end": 111, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 114, + "end": 129, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 131, + "end": 164, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 165, + "end": 172, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 210, + "end": 220, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 247, + "end": 266, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 343, + "end": 353, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 359, + "end": 371, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 380, + "end": 392, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 435, + "end": 452, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 524, + "end": 532, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 542, + "end": 550, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 842, + "end": 845, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 849, + "end": 869, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3354, + "end": 3357, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3497, + "end": 3504, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3769, + "end": 3780, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3808, + "end": 3827, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4481, + "end": 4488, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5146, + "end": 5160, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5200, + "end": 5220, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5289, + "end": 5304, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5380, + "end": 5391, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5508, + "end": 5519, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5620, + "end": 5636, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5815, + "end": 5825, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7943, + "end": 7958, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8470, + "end": 8480, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8821, + "end": 8831, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9381, + "end": 9401, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9458, + "end": 9467, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 9582, + "end": 9597, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9676, + "end": 9679, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9738, + "end": 9741, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9853, + "end": 9856, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9944, + "end": 9959, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 10166, + "end": 10212, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10217, + "end": 10271, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10277, + "end": 10336, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10339, + "end": 10382, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10409, + "end": 10419, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 10929, + "end": 10932, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11407, + "end": 11410, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11458, + "end": 11474, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11845, + "end": 11865, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12415, + "end": 12418, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12716, + "end": 12719, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 14094, + "end": 14105, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14174, + "end": 14177, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 14374, + "end": 14377, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15448, + "end": 15479, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15799, + "end": 15812, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 16201, + "end": 16234, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16416, + "end": 16429, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 16534, + "end": 16547, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 17450, + "end": 17453, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18200, + "end": 18203, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18286, + "end": 18289, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18341, + "end": 18344, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18487, + "end": 18490, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18546, + "end": 18549, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18613, + "end": 18616, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18875, + "end": 18878, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18981, + "end": 18984, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 19127, + "end": 19130, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 19304, + "end": 19307, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 19449, + "end": 19452, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 19473, + "end": 19476, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 19965, + "end": 19972, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21056, + "end": 21059, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 21337, + "end": 21340, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 21643, + "end": 21646, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 22357, + "end": 22380, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 22450, + "end": 22473, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 22692, + "end": 22695, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 22785, + "end": 22788, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 22958, + "end": 22961, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 23099, + "end": 23102, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 23229, + "end": 23232, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 23333, + "end": 23336, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 23457, + "end": 23460, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 23635, + "end": 23638, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 23802, + "end": 23805, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 24158, + "end": 24161, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 24588, + "end": 24591, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 24682, + "end": 24685, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 24721, + "end": 24724, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 24855, + "end": 24866, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 24886, + "end": 24896, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 25050, + "end": 25060, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 25212, + "end": 25223, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 25228, + "end": 25238, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 25676, + "end": 25679, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 25966, + "end": 25969, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 26086, + "end": 26089, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 26216, + "end": 26219, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 26260, + "end": 26263, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 26340, + "end": 26343, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 26757, + "end": 26760, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 26793, + "end": 26796, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 27142, + "end": 27161, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 27274, + "end": 27277, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 27319, + "end": 27322, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 28265, + "end": 28280, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 28397, + "end": 28414, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 28421, + "end": 28434, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "108594766": [ + { + "start": 116, + "end": 145, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 147, + "end": 158, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 187, + "end": 200, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 201, + "end": 233, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 259, + "end": 274, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 348, + "end": 358, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 373, + "end": 393, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 410, + "end": 431, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 468, + "end": 478, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 593, + "end": 603, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 685, + "end": 695, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 710, + "end": 750, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 763, + "end": 767, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 773, + "end": 794, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 860, + "end": 864, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 979, + "end": 989, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1414, + "end": 1418, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1487, + "end": 1491, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1837, + "end": 1841, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2954, + "end": 2967, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3002, + "end": 3012, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3099, + "end": 3109, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3124, + "end": 3128, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3223, + "end": 3233, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3572, + "end": 3582, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4269, + "end": 4279, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4387, + "end": 4397, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4841, + "end": 4851, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4948, + "end": 5016, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 5082, + "end": 5142, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 5310, + "end": 5317, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 5381, + "end": 5391, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5537, + "end": 5547, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5624, + "end": 5628, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5856, + "end": 5866, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6098, + "end": 6108, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6400, + "end": 6410, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6536, + "end": 6546, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6742, + "end": 6752, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6887, + "end": 6911, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6925, + "end": 6931, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7151, + "end": 7157, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7505, + "end": 7516, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7913, + "end": 7924, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8592, + "end": 8596, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 8687, + "end": 8697, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8823, + "end": 8833, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9015, + "end": 9021, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9990, + "end": 9996, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10595, + "end": 10627, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11066, + "end": 11072, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11184, + "end": 11190, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11320, + "end": 11326, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11616, + "end": 11622, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12591, + "end": 12677, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12847, + "end": 12853, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12918, + "end": 12928, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 14264, + "end": 14289, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 14496, + "end": 14545, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14746, + "end": 14796, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14854, + "end": 14926, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14970, + "end": 14973, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15552, + "end": 15589, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15768, + "end": 15845, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16424, + "end": 16434, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 16545, + "end": 16551, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17688, + "end": 17704, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 17708, + "end": 17741, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18771, + "end": 18777, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18841, + "end": 18851, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19986, + "end": 19997, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20462, + "end": 20505, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20571, + "end": 20582, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20610, + "end": 20622, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20693, + "end": 20704, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21633, + "end": 21694, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21742, + "end": 21752, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 21902, + "end": 21913, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 22360, + "end": 22371, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 22677, + "end": 22727, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 23089, + "end": 23100, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 23457, + "end": 23467, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 23473, + "end": 23483, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 23594, + "end": 23604, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 23635, + "end": 23645, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 23787, + "end": 23797, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 24060, + "end": 24078, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 24203, + "end": 24213, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 24308, + "end": 24318, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 24748, + "end": 24759, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24776, + "end": 24789, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 25268, + "end": 25280, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 25489, + "end": 25499, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 26304, + "end": 26315, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26779, + "end": 26791, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 27178, + "end": 27184, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 27695, + "end": 27707, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 28265, + "end": 28277, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 28498, + "end": 28572, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 28594, + "end": 28606, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 28629, + "end": 28638, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 30037, + "end": 30052, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 30099, + "end": 30115, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "50547742": [ + { + "start": 4, + "end": 17, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 82, + "end": 110, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 133, + "end": 141, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 223, + "end": 230, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 288, + "end": 293, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 357, + "end": 364, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 829, + "end": 842, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 878, + "end": 888, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 1075, + "end": 1085, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 1123, + "end": 1133, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1168, + "end": 1178, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1185, + "end": 1198, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1562, + "end": 1592, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1693, + "end": 1701, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1934, + "end": 1942, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2002, + "end": 2026, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2039, + "end": 2047, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2209, + "end": 2219, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2559, + "end": 2572, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2938, + "end": 2946, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3012, + "end": 3020, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3184, + "end": 3192, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3194, + "end": 3205, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3269, + "end": 3280, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3421, + "end": 3440, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3451, + "end": 3472, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 3558, + "end": 3566, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 3593, + "end": 3598, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 3852, + "end": 3860, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3874, + "end": 3887, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 4233, + "end": 4241, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5121, + "end": 5129, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5235, + "end": 5243, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5258, + "end": 5271, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 6407, + "end": 6415, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 6778, + "end": 6791, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 6995, + "end": 7008, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7020, + "end": 7078, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7142, + "end": 7150, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7788, + "end": 7794, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7980, + "end": 7986, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8193, + "end": 8199, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8223, + "end": 8233, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8375, + "end": 8388, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 8695, + "end": 8703, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8740, + "end": 8750, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8791, + "end": 8799, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8814, + "end": 8827, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8886, + "end": 8896, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8947, + "end": 8963, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9130, + "end": 9143, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9443, + "end": 9510, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9549, + "end": 9562, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9798, + "end": 9806, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9889, + "end": 9902, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 9925, + "end": 9933, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 10020, + "end": 10030, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 10202, + "end": 10215, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 10656, + "end": 10661, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 10690, + "end": 10698, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 10796, + "end": 10864, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10878, + "end": 10901, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10905, + "end": 10915, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10920, + "end": 10939, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 10945, + "end": 11020, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 11024, + "end": 11046, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 11055, + "end": 11068, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 11069, + "end": 11092, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 11099, + "end": 11109, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11123, + "end": 11143, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 11165, + "end": 11184, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 11386, + "end": 11396, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 11416, + "end": 11429, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 11560, + "end": 11568, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11592, + "end": 11597, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 11802, + "end": 11810, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 12169, + "end": 12179, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 12205, + "end": 12228, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12270, + "end": 12283, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 12310, + "end": 12368, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12404, + "end": 12417, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 12421, + "end": 12503, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12519, + "end": 12542, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12684, + "end": 12697, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 12787, + "end": 12796, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12918, + "end": 12974, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 13057, + "end": 13086, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13312, + "end": 13318, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13533, + "end": 13564, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 13577, + "end": 13581, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 13612, + "end": 13636, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 13648, + "end": 13671, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 13800, + "end": 13808, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 13930, + "end": 13943, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 13963, + "end": 13986, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14041, + "end": 14054, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 14079, + "end": 14092, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14277, + "end": 14285, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 14362, + "end": 14372, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 14406, + "end": 14414, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 14665, + "end": 14670, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 14821, + "end": 14882, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14973, + "end": 14981, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 15193, + "end": 15206, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15312, + "end": 15320, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 15548, + "end": 15561, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 15804, + "end": 15827, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15832, + "end": 15852, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15888, + "end": 15901, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 15913, + "end": 15930, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16175, + "end": 16204, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16220, + "end": 16226, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16365, + "end": 16379, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16658, + "end": 16671, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 16683, + "end": 16734, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16883, + "end": 16900, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16910, + "end": 16923, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 16992, + "end": 17005, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 17270, + "end": 17278, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 17284, + "end": 17307, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17392, + "end": 17401, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17426, + "end": 17439, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17445, + "end": 17465, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17603, + "end": 17611, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 17980, + "end": 17988, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18158, + "end": 18168, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 18180, + "end": 18193, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18275, + "end": 18283, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 18336, + "end": 18344, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18466, + "end": 18474, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 18553, + "end": 18566, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 18613, + "end": 18621, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18867, + "end": 18875, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18902, + "end": 18910, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 19338, + "end": 19346, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 19454, + "end": 19462, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 19555, + "end": 19563, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 19664, + "end": 19672, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 19866, + "end": 19874, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 20003, + "end": 20011, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 20073, + "end": 20081, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20146, + "end": 20159, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 20214, + "end": 20222, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 20305, + "end": 20318, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 20330, + "end": 20415, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20449, + "end": 20469, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20481, + "end": 20542, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20576, + "end": 20596, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20852, + "end": 20860, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 20944, + "end": 20958, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21032, + "end": 21045, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 21085, + "end": 21099, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21138, + "end": 21165, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21243, + "end": 21270, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21358, + "end": 21385, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 21414, + "end": 21427, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 21504, + "end": 21527, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 21532, + "end": 21550, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 21603, + "end": 21616, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 21635, + "end": 21653, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 21721, + "end": 21744, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 22362, + "end": 22375, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 22433, + "end": 22449, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 22454, + "end": 22464, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 22629, + "end": 22639, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 22682, + "end": 22690, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 22854, + "end": 22862, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 23016, + "end": 23049, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 23089, + "end": 23104, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 23180, + "end": 23197, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 23905, + "end": 23913, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 23986, + "end": 23994, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 24116, + "end": 24124, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 24228, + "end": 24236, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 24484, + "end": 24497, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 25018, + "end": 25036, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 25050, + "end": 25082, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 25505, + "end": 25513, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 25534, + "end": 25547, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 25671, + "end": 25686, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 25835, + "end": 25840, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 25980, + "end": 25995, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 26086, + "end": 26101, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 26212, + "end": 26228, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 26379, + "end": 26387, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 26468, + "end": 26481, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 26482, + "end": 26518, + "label": "CASENO" + } + ], + "1052174": [ + { + "start": 9, + "end": 22, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 68, + "end": 87, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 119, + "end": 138, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 153, + "end": 186, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 188, + "end": 192, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 532, + "end": 541, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 610, + "end": 619, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 696, + "end": 713, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 737, + "end": 751, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 771, + "end": 775, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1003, + "end": 1019, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1079, + "end": 1093, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1354, + "end": 1358, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1552, + "end": 1604, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1636, + "end": 1654, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1786, + "end": 1804, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1830, + "end": 1834, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1849, + "end": 1859, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1978, + "end": 1996, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2139, + "end": 2143, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2177, + "end": 2195, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2367, + "end": 2371, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2476, + "end": 2480, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2548, + "end": 2566, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2695, + "end": 2713, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2747, + "end": 2755, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2774, + "end": 2783, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2908, + "end": 2926, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3206, + "end": 3210, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3378, + "end": 3382, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3482, + "end": 3486, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 4046, + "end": 4050, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 4243, + "end": 4261, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 4659, + "end": 4678, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 4757, + "end": 4766, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5077, + "end": 5096, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5251, + "end": 5271, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5416, + "end": 5420, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5480, + "end": 5488, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5684, + "end": 5688, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5859, + "end": 5873, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5919, + "end": 5927, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 6193, + "end": 6197, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 6352, + "end": 6370, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 6526, + "end": 6544, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 6654, + "end": 6658, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 6825, + "end": 6829, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 6962, + "end": 6966, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 7230, + "end": 7244, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7593, + "end": 7602, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7739, + "end": 7748, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7758, + "end": 7762, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 7963, + "end": 7967, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 8509, + "end": 8513, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 8746, + "end": 8756, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 8923, + "end": 8942, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9122, + "end": 9130, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9159, + "end": 9169, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9488, + "end": 9492, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9600, + "end": 9620, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9676, + "end": 9685, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9796, + "end": 9812, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9966, + "end": 9970, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 10132, + "end": 10146, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10651, + "end": 10665, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10680, + "end": 10684, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 10773, + "end": 10791, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 10894, + "end": 10912, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 10930, + "end": 10934, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 10998, + "end": 11016, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 11302, + "end": 11320, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 11447, + "end": 11451, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 11759, + "end": 11763, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 11838, + "end": 11856, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 11925, + "end": 11943, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 11985, + "end": 11989, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 12140, + "end": 12144, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 12183, + "end": 12201, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 12289, + "end": 12293, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 12365, + "end": 12369, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 12532, + "end": 12546, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12633, + "end": 12637, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 12730, + "end": 12748, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 13464, + "end": 13468, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 13550, + "end": 13568, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 13679, + "end": 13683, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 13968, + "end": 13972, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 14099, + "end": 14103, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 14182, + "end": 14200, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 14305, + "end": 14324, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 14432, + "end": 14447, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 14453, + "end": 14471, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 14730, + "end": 14748, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 14765, + "end": 14785, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 14884, + "end": 14888, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 14991, + "end": 15011, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 15028, + "end": 15043, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15048, + "end": 15066, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 15144, + "end": 15162, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 15258, + "end": 15276, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 15458, + "end": 15466, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15521, + "end": 15525, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 15695, + "end": 15699, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 15818, + "end": 15836, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 15903, + "end": 15907, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 16074, + "end": 16084, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16100, + "end": 16156, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16835, + "end": 16845, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17009, + "end": 17027, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 17126, + "end": 17130, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 17606, + "end": 17610, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 17846, + "end": 17860, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 18024, + "end": 18033, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 18084, + "end": 18088, + "label": "AUTH" + } + ], + "1572927": [ + { + "start": 12, + "end": 25, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 42, + "end": 56, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 82, + "end": 92, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 100, + "end": 121, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 133, + "end": 154, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 159, + "end": 168, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 183, + "end": 196, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 197, + "end": 213, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 214, + "end": 230, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 231, + "end": 245, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 246, + "end": 263, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 281, + "end": 296, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 299, + "end": 324, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 327, + "end": 342, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 345, + "end": 360, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 366, + "end": 380, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 381, + "end": 397, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 628, + "end": 655, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1390, + "end": 1404, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1470, + "end": 1484, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1884, + "end": 1896, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2011, + "end": 2021, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2916, + "end": 2937, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3974, + "end": 4027, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 4039, + "end": 4072, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 4493, + "end": 4535, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 4867, + "end": 4932, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 5129, + "end": 5198, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7634, + "end": 7736, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7741, + "end": 7800, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7984, + "end": 7994, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8287, + "end": 8294, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8337, + "end": 8366, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 8402, + "end": 8410, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8418, + "end": 8434, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8447, + "end": 8463, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 8465, + "end": 8475, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 8477, + "end": 8494, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 8499, + "end": 8509, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 8529, + "end": 8537, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 8569, + "end": 8577, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 8579, + "end": 8588, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 8593, + "end": 8603, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 8752, + "end": 8764, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8795, + "end": 8811, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8824, + "end": 8840, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 8951, + "end": 8972, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9024, + "end": 9034, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9141, + "end": 9155, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9363, + "end": 9380, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9592, + "end": 9606, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10163, + "end": 10177, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10559, + "end": 10568, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10767, + "end": 10781, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11389, + "end": 11398, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11404, + "end": 11414, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 11891, + "end": 11896, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 15199, + "end": 15210, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16030, + "end": 16083, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16090, + "end": 16095, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17832, + "end": 17873, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18186, + "end": 18196, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18200, + "end": 18265, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18808, + "end": 18878, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18893, + "end": 18905, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 19549, + "end": 19562, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 19568, + "end": 19654, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20653, + "end": 20662, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20818, + "end": 20825, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21745, + "end": 21750, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 24047, + "end": 24054, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24823, + "end": 24881, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 25455, + "end": 25465, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 25512, + "end": 25522, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 25595, + "end": 25609, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "115833707": [ + { + "start": 7, + "end": 29, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 91, + "end": 111, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 116, + "end": 153, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 154, + "end": 171, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 232, + "end": 247, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 366, + "end": 379, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 401, + "end": 415, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 548, + "end": 558, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 602, + "end": 618, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 622, + "end": 638, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 660, + "end": 674, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 727, + "end": 741, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 784, + "end": 797, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 819, + "end": 833, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 926, + "end": 963, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 964, + "end": 985, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1007, + "end": 1021, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 1134, + "end": 1147, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1178, + "end": 1192, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 1290, + "end": 1301, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1302, + "end": 1317, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1348, + "end": 1362, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 1620, + "end": 1630, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1775, + "end": 1785, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2058, + "end": 2093, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2140, + "end": 2155, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 2186, + "end": 2199, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 2230, + "end": 2245, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 2276, + "end": 2287, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 2300, + "end": 2316, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2336, + "end": 2358, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2398, + "end": 2445, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2446, + "end": 2463, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 2503, + "end": 2518, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 2556, + "end": 2596, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2600, + "end": 2637, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2643, + "end": 2681, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2729, + "end": 2767, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2844, + "end": 2883, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2887, + "end": 2924, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2934, + "end": 2973, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2977, + "end": 3014, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 3027, + "end": 3051, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 3237, + "end": 3250, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3273, + "end": 3297, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 3300, + "end": 3314, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 3318, + "end": 3328, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 3482, + "end": 3497, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3726, + "end": 3819, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3826, + "end": 3837, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4254, + "end": 4265, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4360, + "end": 4371, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4407, + "end": 4418, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4508, + "end": 4523, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 4554, + "end": 4563, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 4624, + "end": 4637, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 4717, + "end": 4732, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 4940, + "end": 4953, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 5884, + "end": 5895, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5947, + "end": 5962, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 6129, + "end": 6138, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 6756, + "end": 6769, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6987, + "end": 7000, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 7051, + "end": 7066, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 7082, + "end": 7093, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7246, + "end": 7261, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 7318, + "end": 7331, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7340, + "end": 7376, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7380, + "end": 7392, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7460, + "end": 7477, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7695, + "end": 7707, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 7764, + "end": 7788, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7855, + "end": 7903, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7905, + "end": 7969, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8061, + "end": 8154, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8173, + "end": 8182, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 8461, + "end": 8475, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8477, + "end": 8533, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8539, + "end": 8562, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8563, + "end": 8644, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9024, + "end": 9038, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9040, + "end": 9096, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9102, + "end": 9125, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9126, + "end": 9207, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9240, + "end": 9250, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9252, + "end": 9316, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9730, + "end": 9739, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9879, + "end": 9889, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9891, + "end": 9955, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9982, + "end": 9996, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9998, + "end": 10054, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10060, + "end": 10083, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10084, + "end": 10165, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10414, + "end": 10438, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10592, + "end": 10607, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 10624, + "end": 10688, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10910, + "end": 10925, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 10942, + "end": 11006, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 11305, + "end": 11316, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11684, + "end": 11699, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 11716, + "end": 11780, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12064, + "end": 12079, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 12097, + "end": 12161, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12226, + "end": 12237, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12339, + "end": 12354, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 12371, + "end": 12435, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12823, + "end": 12832, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 12863, + "end": 12880, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12980, + "end": 12992, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 13256, + "end": 13271, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 13300, + "end": 13313, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13758, + "end": 13775, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 14201, + "end": 14218, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 14497, + "end": 14507, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14683, + "end": 14698, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 14769, + "end": 14780, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15008, + "end": 15032, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15102, + "end": 15113, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15215, + "end": 15262, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 15292, + "end": 15307, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15354, + "end": 15378, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15441, + "end": 15452, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15534, + "end": 15545, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15596, + "end": 15636, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 15666, + "end": 15681, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15705, + "end": 15729, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15801, + "end": 15812, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15888, + "end": 15926, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 15956, + "end": 15972, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15996, + "end": 16020, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16092, + "end": 16103, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16206, + "end": 16244, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 16274, + "end": 16290, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 16314, + "end": 16338, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16392, + "end": 16403, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16468, + "end": 16483, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 16522, + "end": 16533, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16608, + "end": 16624, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 16648, + "end": 16672, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16723, + "end": 16734, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16860, + "end": 16899, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 16929, + "end": 16944, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 16968, + "end": 16992, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17046, + "end": 17057, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17141, + "end": 17150, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 17169, + "end": 17208, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 17238, + "end": 17253, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 17277, + "end": 17301, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17352, + "end": 17363, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17521, + "end": 17534, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17589, + "end": 17613, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17668, + "end": 17679, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17759, + "end": 17771, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18218, + "end": 18242, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18354, + "end": 18369, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 18404, + "end": 18417, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18426, + "end": 18438, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18476, + "end": 18489, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18796, + "end": 18820, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18924, + "end": 18939, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 19026, + "end": 19037, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 19390, + "end": 19402, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 19420, + "end": 19436, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 19531, + "end": 19543, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 19635, + "end": 19646, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 19650, + "end": 19664, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 19937, + "end": 20019, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20462, + "end": 20471, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 20692, + "end": 20724, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20726, + "end": 20802, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21523, + "end": 21535, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21598, + "end": 21622, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21862, + "end": 21874, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 22144, + "end": 22168, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 22181, + "end": 22197, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 22323, + "end": 22333, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 22390, + "end": 22400, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 22404, + "end": 22414, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 22637, + "end": 22652, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 22705, + "end": 22720, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 22805, + "end": 22825, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 22906, + "end": 22920, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 22924, + "end": 22939, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 22968, + "end": 22975, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 22979, + "end": 22989, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 23147, + "end": 23161, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 23312, + "end": 23327, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 23387, + "end": 23402, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 23455, + "end": 23470, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 23527, + "end": 23542, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 23614, + "end": 23621, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 23625, + "end": 23632, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 23633, + "end": 23646, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 23680, + "end": 23694, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 23767, + "end": 23782, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 23835, + "end": 23850, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 24012, + "end": 24026, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 24088, + "end": 24102, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 24106, + "end": 24121, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 24253, + "end": 24268, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 24311, + "end": 24323, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 24327, + "end": 24337, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 24472, + "end": 24484, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 24492, + "end": 24501, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 24558, + "end": 24571, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 24617, + "end": 24629, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 24633, + "end": 24653, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 24787, + "end": 24800, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 24836, + "end": 24849, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 24907, + "end": 24917, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 25030, + "end": 25046, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 25243, + "end": 25258, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 25302, + "end": 25315, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 25337, + "end": 25352, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 25464, + "end": 25489, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 25511, + "end": 25524, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 25546, + "end": 25561, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 25735, + "end": 25745, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 25890, + "end": 25900, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 26173, + "end": 26208, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 26247, + "end": 26272, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 26448, + "end": 26460, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26523, + "end": 26533, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26787, + "end": 26799, + "label": "PREC" + } + ], + "14063857": [ + { + "start": 104, + "end": 124, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 192, + "end": 204, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 231, + "end": 237, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 246, + "end": 269, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 284, + "end": 296, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 505, + "end": 545, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 637, + "end": 645, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 865, + "end": 873, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 884, + "end": 906, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 908, + "end": 949, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 1097, + "end": 1105, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1279, + "end": 1316, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2020, + "end": 2036, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2045, + "end": 2082, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2098, + "end": 2149, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2244, + "end": 2260, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2285, + "end": 2302, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2310, + "end": 2372, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2650, + "end": 2666, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3128, + "end": 3144, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3280, + "end": 3295, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3301, + "end": 3317, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3424, + "end": 3437, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3511, + "end": 3531, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4508, + "end": 4516, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4546, + "end": 4555, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4566, + "end": 4590, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4776, + "end": 4801, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5174, + "end": 5199, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5380, + "end": 5404, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5609, + "end": 5624, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6753, + "end": 6766, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7138, + "end": 7151, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7529, + "end": 7542, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7558, + "end": 7620, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7688, + "end": 7736, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7742, + "end": 7755, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8529, + "end": 8608, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8720, + "end": 8745, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8764, + "end": 8769, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8888, + "end": 8904, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9486, + "end": 9491, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9532, + "end": 9537, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9689, + "end": 9705, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9845, + "end": 9850, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9893, + "end": 9902, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9967, + "end": 10032, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10095, + "end": 10195, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10332, + "end": 10357, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11093, + "end": 11118, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11292, + "end": 11317, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11384, + "end": 11409, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12092, + "end": 12100, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12151, + "end": 12160, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12171, + "end": 12201, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 12317, + "end": 12325, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12366, + "end": 12375, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12813, + "end": 12821, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12825, + "end": 12833, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12905, + "end": 12914, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12925, + "end": 12948, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 12950, + "end": 13018, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 13150, + "end": 13171, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16970, + "end": 16982, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16995, + "end": 17007, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17190, + "end": 17210, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 17536, + "end": 17556, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 17633, + "end": 17642, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "79816183": [ + { + "start": 106, + "end": 126, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 146, + "end": 160, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 227, + "end": 242, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 258, + "end": 278, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 334, + "end": 349, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 867, + "end": 887, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1442, + "end": 1461, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1568, + "end": 1588, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 1811, + "end": 1831, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 1850, + "end": 1873, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 2305, + "end": 2322, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 2344, + "end": 2365, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 2452, + "end": 2467, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 2572, + "end": 2595, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2612, + "end": 2615, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2840, + "end": 2853, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 2858, + "end": 2870, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 2961, + "end": 2982, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 2998, + "end": 3008, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 3057, + "end": 3077, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 3232, + "end": 3251, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3481, + "end": 3484, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3516, + "end": 3550, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3656, + "end": 3673, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3926, + "end": 3929, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4094, + "end": 4097, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4372, + "end": 4389, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4460, + "end": 4470, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4476, + "end": 4504, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4530, + "end": 4548, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5010, + "end": 5013, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5128, + "end": 5146, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5205, + "end": 5225, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 6694, + "end": 6713, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7734, + "end": 7757, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 8434, + "end": 8454, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 9526, + "end": 9545, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9718, + "end": 9738, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 10149, + "end": 10152, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10825, + "end": 10828, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10883, + "end": 10895, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11425, + "end": 11428, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11472, + "end": 11484, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 14958, + "end": 14968, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 14973, + "end": 14983, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15998, + "end": 16045, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16296, + "end": 16344, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16631, + "end": 16697, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17195, + "end": 17244, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 19116, + "end": 19166, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 19601, + "end": 19640, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 23019, + "end": 23022, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 23970, + "end": 23980, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 24233, + "end": 24253, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 24435, + "end": 24445, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 25184, + "end": 25199, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 25239, + "end": 25271, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 25284, + "end": 25299, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "756812": [ + { + "start": 10, + "end": 36, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 119, + "end": 129, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 137, + "end": 148, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 151, + "end": 166, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 186, + "end": 197, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 294, + "end": 303, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 307, + "end": 324, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 469, + "end": 472, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 622, + "end": 629, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 712, + "end": 721, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 822, + "end": 831, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 854, + "end": 861, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1504, + "end": 1511, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 2118, + "end": 2127, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2196, + "end": 2203, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 2500, + "end": 2520, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 2571, + "end": 2580, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2659, + "end": 2675, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 2839, + "end": 2846, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 2894, + "end": 2903, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2947, + "end": 2973, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 3048, + "end": 3051, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3190, + "end": 3207, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3300, + "end": 3303, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3341, + "end": 3344, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3703, + "end": 3706, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3746, + "end": 3749, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3859, + "end": 3869, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3902, + "end": 3911, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3990, + "end": 4010, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 4272, + "end": 4281, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4849, + "end": 4856, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 5367, + "end": 5376, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 6888, + "end": 6894, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 6936, + "end": 6943, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 7427, + "end": 7435, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 8125, + "end": 8133, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 8510, + "end": 8517, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8575, + "end": 8584, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8745, + "end": 8752, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9699, + "end": 9708, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9750, + "end": 9759, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 9791, + "end": 9800, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 10479, + "end": 10486, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 10496, + "end": 10504, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 10924, + "end": 10932, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 11257, + "end": 11264, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11644, + "end": 11652, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 11993, + "end": 12000, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12269, + "end": 12272, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12621, + "end": 12624, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12690, + "end": 12711, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12732, + "end": 12753, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 14319, + "end": 14376, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14381, + "end": 14447, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14784, + "end": 14805, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 14984, + "end": 14987, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15564, + "end": 15567, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15763, + "end": 15766, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15962, + "end": 15972, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 16102, + "end": 16105, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16127, + "end": 16186, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16216, + "end": 16248, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16292, + "end": 16324, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16885, + "end": 16888, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17113, + "end": 17116, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17212, + "end": 17221, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 17229, + "end": 17239, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 17273, + "end": 17281, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 17358, + "end": 17361, + "label": "STAT" + } + ], + "75243301": [ + { + "start": 105, + "end": 109, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 112, + "end": 128, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 149, + "end": 169, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 263, + "end": 295, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 312, + "end": 339, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 352, + "end": 363, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 396, + "end": 409, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 492, + "end": 502, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 744, + "end": 747, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1019, + "end": 1029, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1093, + "end": 1101, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1136, + "end": 1167, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1218, + "end": 1249, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1317, + "end": 1348, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1444, + "end": 1494, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1510, + "end": 1532, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 1579, + "end": 1589, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1607, + "end": 1629, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 1772, + "end": 1782, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1859, + "end": 1869, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1911, + "end": 1921, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 2257, + "end": 2267, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2693, + "end": 2703, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2772, + "end": 2780, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 2815, + "end": 2825, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2978, + "end": 2988, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3032, + "end": 3040, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 3066, + "end": 3076, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3389, + "end": 3392, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3540, + "end": 3569, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3921, + "end": 3931, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5986, + "end": 5996, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 6375, + "end": 6385, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 6600, + "end": 6610, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 6667, + "end": 6689, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 7428, + "end": 7436, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 8444, + "end": 8452, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 9014, + "end": 9036, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 9342, + "end": 9352, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 10299, + "end": 10303, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 10601, + "end": 10605, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 11091, + "end": 11105, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 11158, + "end": 11168, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 11415, + "end": 11425, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11472, + "end": 11482, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11525, + "end": 11539, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 11556, + "end": 11566, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11614, + "end": 11625, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12067, + "end": 12118, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12271, + "end": 12290, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 14187, + "end": 14210, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17016, + "end": 17023, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17180, + "end": 17187, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17291, + "end": 17347, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17353, + "end": 17415, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17682, + "end": 17695, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 17895, + "end": 17898, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18071, + "end": 18081, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 18264, + "end": 18329, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18331, + "end": 18380, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18385, + "end": 18436, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18619, + "end": 18660, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 19033, + "end": 19043, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 19641, + "end": 19672, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 19816, + "end": 19847, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 19863, + "end": 19895, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 19944, + "end": 19975, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 20073, + "end": 20083, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 20096, + "end": 20111, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "806212": [ + { + "start": 70, + "end": 105, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 106, + "end": 131, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 153, + "end": 173, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 298, + "end": 315, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 326, + "end": 363, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 377, + "end": 381, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 436, + "end": 443, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 683, + "end": 711, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 758, + "end": 777, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 781, + "end": 793, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 809, + "end": 844, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 880, + "end": 887, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1372, + "end": 1382, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1507, + "end": 1517, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1659, + "end": 1669, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1775, + "end": 1789, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1816, + "end": 1848, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1865, + "end": 1895, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1914, + "end": 1926, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1975, + "end": 2003, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 2032, + "end": 2055, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 2146, + "end": 2175, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 2225, + "end": 2252, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 2318, + "end": 2347, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 2355, + "end": 2371, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2412, + "end": 2431, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2541, + "end": 2548, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 2569, + "end": 2576, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 2710, + "end": 2727, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2733, + "end": 2752, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2830, + "end": 2837, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 2936, + "end": 2953, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3032, + "end": 3039, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 3075, + "end": 3106, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 3119, + "end": 3138, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3169, + "end": 3191, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3255, + "end": 3262, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 3268, + "end": 3286, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3292, + "end": 3311, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3327, + "end": 3356, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3361, + "end": 3383, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3433, + "end": 3440, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 3551, + "end": 3585, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3731, + "end": 3738, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 3765, + "end": 3782, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3820, + "end": 3836, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3899, + "end": 3911, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4029, + "end": 4046, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4092, + "end": 4129, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4151, + "end": 4171, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 4389, + "end": 4409, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 4652, + "end": 4667, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4673, + "end": 4690, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4936, + "end": 4967, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5274, + "end": 5305, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5578, + "end": 5599, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5731, + "end": 5748, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5855, + "end": 5859, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5941, + "end": 5962, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 5971, + "end": 5987, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6179, + "end": 6195, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6200, + "end": 6217, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6311, + "end": 6327, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6875, + "end": 6882, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 7228, + "end": 7235, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 7606, + "end": 7622, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7772, + "end": 7795, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 7799, + "end": 7828, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 7885, + "end": 7907, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 7927, + "end": 7946, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8063, + "end": 8076, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8129, + "end": 8142, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8244, + "end": 8270, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 8285, + "end": 8305, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 8636, + "end": 8653, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8718, + "end": 8752, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8795, + "end": 8812, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8855, + "end": 8859, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 8941, + "end": 8951, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8979, + "end": 8983, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9252, + "end": 9266, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 9295, + "end": 9312, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9318, + "end": 9322, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9674, + "end": 9678, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9877, + "end": 9888, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 9932, + "end": 9946, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 10019, + "end": 10030, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 10811, + "end": 10824, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10832, + "end": 10866, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 11060, + "end": 11121, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 11131, + "end": 11191, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 11227, + "end": 11231, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 11432, + "end": 11436, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 11640, + "end": 11651, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 11668, + "end": 11672, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 11889, + "end": 11893, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 12111, + "end": 12135, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 12294, + "end": 12298, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 12468, + "end": 12479, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 12518, + "end": 12522, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 12832, + "end": 12836, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 13086, + "end": 13160, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 13163, + "end": 13222, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 13466, + "end": 13470, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 13623, + "end": 13627, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 13674, + "end": 13681, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 14181, + "end": 14221, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14257, + "end": 14261, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 14328, + "end": 14340, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 14424, + "end": 14438, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 14671, + "end": 14693, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 14808, + "end": 14812, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 14921, + "end": 14925, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 15313, + "end": 15327, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 15682, + "end": 15695, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15737, + "end": 15771, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 16138, + "end": 16155, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 16159, + "end": 16228, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16284, + "end": 16298, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16302, + "end": 16332, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16336, + "end": 16370, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16377, + "end": 16436, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16524, + "end": 16537, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 16581, + "end": 16585, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 16678, + "end": 16682, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 16832, + "end": 16846, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 17827, + "end": 17841, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 18603, + "end": 18610, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 18743, + "end": 18750, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 18959, + "end": 18976, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19372, + "end": 19379, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 19451, + "end": 19455, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 19702, + "end": 19706, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 19954, + "end": 19958, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 20328, + "end": 20332, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 20486, + "end": 20502, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 20601, + "end": 20615, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21022, + "end": 21040, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21283, + "end": 21287, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 21316, + "end": 21326, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 21667, + "end": 21674, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 22066, + "end": 22076, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 24465, + "end": 24475, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 25173, + "end": 25183, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 25750, + "end": 25760, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 26312, + "end": 26322, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 28687, + "end": 28706, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 29968, + "end": 29986, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 33089, + "end": 33094, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 33102, + "end": 33108, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 33205, + "end": 33215, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 33485, + "end": 33491, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 33539, + "end": 33558, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 33601, + "end": 33606, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 33614, + "end": 33674, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 33757, + "end": 33776, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 33846, + "end": 33870, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 34361, + "end": 34371, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 34467, + "end": 34471, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 34517, + "end": 34521, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 34589, + "end": 34599, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 34825, + "end": 34845, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 34849, + "end": 34875, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 34950, + "end": 34954, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 35324, + "end": 35328, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 35802, + "end": 35815, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 35827, + "end": 35861, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 36117, + "end": 36143, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 36158, + "end": 36178, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 36324, + "end": 36328, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 37587, + "end": 37595, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 38326, + "end": 38330, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 38708, + "end": 38712, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 38803, + "end": 38820, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 38858, + "end": 38883, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 38885, + "end": 38911, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 38941, + "end": 38987, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 39109, + "end": 39119, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 39146, + "end": 39156, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 39169, + "end": 39185, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "1389243": [ + { + "start": 18, + "end": 40, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 70, + "end": 99, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 116, + "end": 143, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 145, + "end": 157, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 189, + "end": 203, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 238, + "end": 259, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 353, + "end": 363, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 398, + "end": 419, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 432, + "end": 448, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 545, + "end": 555, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 587, + "end": 607, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 609, + "end": 628, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 633, + "end": 652, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 786, + "end": 817, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 847, + "end": 851, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 888, + "end": 898, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1076, + "end": 1086, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1199, + "end": 1203, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1433, + "end": 1454, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1509, + "end": 1519, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1566, + "end": 1585, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1780, + "end": 1853, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2309, + "end": 2313, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2351, + "end": 2361, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2679, + "end": 2689, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2850, + "end": 2854, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2861, + "end": 2871, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4297, + "end": 4316, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 4359, + "end": 4373, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 4658, + "end": 4662, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 4666, + "end": 4676, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4991, + "end": 4995, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5107, + "end": 5111, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5144, + "end": 5154, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5509, + "end": 5577, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5790, + "end": 5800, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5837, + "end": 5847, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6069, + "end": 6079, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6130, + "end": 6140, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6176, + "end": 6186, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6379, + "end": 6393, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 6398, + "end": 6412, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 6497, + "end": 6507, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6605, + "end": 6615, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6703, + "end": 6722, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 7632, + "end": 7651, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 7999, + "end": 8009, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8149, + "end": 8163, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 8421, + "end": 8431, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8465, + "end": 8475, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8698, + "end": 8708, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8902, + "end": 8912, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8921, + "end": 8931, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9218, + "end": 9222, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9428, + "end": 9438, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9460, + "end": 9464, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9890, + "end": 9909, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9971, + "end": 9981, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10000, + "end": 10004, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 10625, + "end": 10635, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10672, + "end": 10676, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 11579, + "end": 11589, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11613, + "end": 11623, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12243, + "end": 12253, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12259, + "end": 12263, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 12715, + "end": 12725, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12760, + "end": 12770, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12905, + "end": 12915, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 13071, + "end": 13092, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13149, + "end": 13161, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 13475, + "end": 13479, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 13613, + "end": 13623, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 13723, + "end": 13782, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 13787, + "end": 13851, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 13857, + "end": 13875, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 14270, + "end": 14274, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 14448, + "end": 14516, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14518, + "end": 14585, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14590, + "end": 14650, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14818, + "end": 14822, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 14868, + "end": 14889, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 14977, + "end": 15050, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15110, + "end": 15118, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 15611, + "end": 15615, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 16296, + "end": 16325, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16748, + "end": 16756, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 16971, + "end": 16981, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 17301, + "end": 17354, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17356, + "end": 17425, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17669, + "end": 17690, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17702, + "end": 17712, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 17957, + "end": 17967, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 18015, + "end": 18025, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 18324, + "end": 18334, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 18482, + "end": 18486, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 18697, + "end": 18701, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 19070, + "end": 19080, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 19785, + "end": 19795, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 20290, + "end": 20294, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 20794, + "end": 20813, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 20844, + "end": 20854, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21122, + "end": 21126, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 21300, + "end": 21310, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21657, + "end": 21676, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 21722, + "end": 21736, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 21809, + "end": 21819, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21872, + "end": 21891, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 22143, + "end": 22153, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 22186, + "end": 22196, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 22230, + "end": 22240, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 22397, + "end": 22407, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 22471, + "end": 22481, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 22619, + "end": 22629, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 23616, + "end": 23637, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 23776, + "end": 23795, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 23829, + "end": 23839, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 24488, + "end": 24507, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 24509, + "end": 24528, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 25861, + "end": 25875, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 26521, + "end": 26525, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 26652, + "end": 26656, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 26936, + "end": 26957, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 27575, + "end": 27585, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 28307, + "end": 28317, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 28537, + "end": 28541, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 28831, + "end": 28841, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 29038, + "end": 29046, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 29181, + "end": 29199, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 29639, + "end": 29655, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 29701, + "end": 29722, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 29735, + "end": 29752, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "118956979": [ + { + "start": 70, + "end": 103, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 120, + "end": 145, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 147, + "end": 172, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 203, + "end": 234, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 449, + "end": 487, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 810, + "end": 814, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1132, + "end": 1142, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1236, + "end": 1242, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 1330, + "end": 1334, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1433, + "end": 1439, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 1465, + "end": 1475, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1523, + "end": 1527, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1546, + "end": 1556, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1579, + "end": 1585, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 1625, + "end": 1631, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 1650, + "end": 1660, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1909, + "end": 1913, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1931, + "end": 1941, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2070, + "end": 2080, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2174, + "end": 2180, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 2246, + "end": 2263, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2302, + "end": 2312, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2330, + "end": 2340, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2383, + "end": 2387, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 2423, + "end": 2433, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2472, + "end": 2482, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2531, + "end": 2535, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 2566, + "end": 2576, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2581, + "end": 2591, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2635, + "end": 2647, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 2835, + "end": 2852, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 2925, + "end": 2937, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 2984, + "end": 2988, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 2989, + "end": 2993, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 3063, + "end": 3073, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3097, + "end": 3103, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 3181, + "end": 3187, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 3286, + "end": 3296, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3303, + "end": 3313, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3319, + "end": 3329, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3331, + "end": 3337, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 3484, + "end": 3494, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4139, + "end": 4159, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4580, + "end": 4586, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 4644, + "end": 4694, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5037, + "end": 5047, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5583, + "end": 5593, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5653, + "end": 5663, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7009, + "end": 7059, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7262, + "end": 7275, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7284, + "end": 7294, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8059, + "end": 8069, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8274, + "end": 8289, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8300, + "end": 8327, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8460, + "end": 8489, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8493, + "end": 8503, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8569, + "end": 8590, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8639, + "end": 8654, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8687, + "end": 8713, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8717, + "end": 8746, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8859, + "end": 8885, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8889, + "end": 8918, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9141, + "end": 9156, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9490, + "end": 9510, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9537, + "end": 9552, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9578, + "end": 9592, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9682, + "end": 9759, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9769, + "end": 9789, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9875, + "end": 9934, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10078, + "end": 10092, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10301, + "end": 10315, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10408, + "end": 10422, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10549, + "end": 10563, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10638, + "end": 10652, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10705, + "end": 10719, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10811, + "end": 10825, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10984, + "end": 11004, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11053, + "end": 11067, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11134, + "end": 11154, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11380, + "end": 11400, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11565, + "end": 11585, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11606, + "end": 11626, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12756, + "end": 12776, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12993, + "end": 13013, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13070, + "end": 13125, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 13219, + "end": 13233, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13518, + "end": 13532, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13750, + "end": 13758, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 13856, + "end": 13864, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 14494, + "end": 14537, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14540, + "end": 14618, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14623, + "end": 14693, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14758, + "end": 14768, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 14814, + "end": 14828, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 14891, + "end": 14906, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15043, + "end": 15060, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15064, + "end": 15108, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15227, + "end": 15241, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15260, + "end": 15300, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15306, + "end": 15323, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15402, + "end": 15422, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15499, + "end": 15514, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15555, + "end": 15575, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15810, + "end": 15827, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15906, + "end": 15921, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15958, + "end": 15968, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 16005, + "end": 16025, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16091, + "end": 16106, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16161, + "end": 16181, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16252, + "end": 16267, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16286, + "end": 16306, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16384, + "end": 16399, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16454, + "end": 16475, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16786, + "end": 16806, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16958, + "end": 16973, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17064, + "end": 17074, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 17090, + "end": 17103, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 17160, + "end": 17180, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17256, + "end": 17276, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17409, + "end": 17424, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17504, + "end": 17524, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17662, + "end": 17682, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17821, + "end": 17836, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17848, + "end": 17858, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 17874, + "end": 17887, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 18433, + "end": 18453, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18530, + "end": 18545, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18563, + "end": 18573, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 18596, + "end": 18609, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 18744, + "end": 18764, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18936, + "end": 18951, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18996, + "end": 19016, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 19140, + "end": 19162, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 19221, + "end": 19231, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 19256, + "end": 19266, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19348, + "end": 19379, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 19395, + "end": 19411, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 19442, + "end": 19456, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 19488, + "end": 19498, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 19509, + "end": 19524, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 19693, + "end": 19713, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 19975, + "end": 20050, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20236, + "end": 20246, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 20335, + "end": 20355, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20383, + "end": 20398, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20628, + "end": 20648, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20796, + "end": 20826, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20828, + "end": 20876, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20909, + "end": 20950, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20952, + "end": 21037, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 22151, + "end": 22161, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 22565, + "end": 22579, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 22581, + "end": 22587, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 22639, + "end": 22649, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 22673, + "end": 22677, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 22699, + "end": 22709, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 22765, + "end": 22775, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 22779, + "end": 22789, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 23681, + "end": 23691, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 24064, + "end": 24099, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24585, + "end": 24606, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 25386, + "end": 25403, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 26442, + "end": 26452, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 27165, + "end": 27182, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 27892, + "end": 27909, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 28365, + "end": 28421, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 28535, + "end": 28545, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 28809, + "end": 28819, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 29585, + "end": 29633, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 30397, + "end": 30447, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 30487, + "end": 30497, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 30579, + "end": 30602, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 30701, + "end": 30711, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 30843, + "end": 30853, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 30957, + "end": 30970, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 31132, + "end": 31145, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 31171, + "end": 31181, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 31475, + "end": 31488, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 31518, + "end": 31528, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 31626, + "end": 31639, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 31647, + "end": 31657, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 32456, + "end": 32469, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 32473, + "end": 32483, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 32691, + "end": 32700, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 32702, + "end": 32717, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 32719, + "end": 32738, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 32927, + "end": 32967, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 33462, + "end": 33475, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 33504, + "end": 33514, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 34399, + "end": 34410, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 34412, + "end": 34461, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 34467, + "end": 34482, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 34515, + "end": 34530, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 34987, + "end": 35049, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 35572, + "end": 35678, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 35862, + "end": 35879, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 35881, + "end": 35940, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 35949, + "end": 36016, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 36213, + "end": 36251, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 36269, + "end": 36292, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 36411, + "end": 36449, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 37346, + "end": 37363, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 38715, + "end": 38742, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 38772, + "end": 38789, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 38954, + "end": 38972, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 38993, + "end": 39010, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 39243, + "end": 39257, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 39393, + "end": 39403, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 39967, + "end": 39980, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 39989, + "end": 39999, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 42625, + "end": 42689, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 42697, + "end": 42722, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 43178, + "end": 43197, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 44751, + "end": 44758, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 44786, + "end": 44810, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 44826, + "end": 44841, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 45883, + "end": 45900, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 46636, + "end": 46652, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 46691, + "end": 46708, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 46795, + "end": 46811, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 47241, + "end": 47266, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 47310, + "end": 47326, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 47447, + "end": 47462, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 47464, + "end": 47489, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 47755, + "end": 47770, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 48375, + "end": 48390, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 48407, + "end": 48427, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 48544, + "end": 48559, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 48564, + "end": 48578, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 49019, + "end": 49036, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 49215, + "end": 49242, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 49244, + "end": 49335, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 50725, + "end": 50742, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 51197, + "end": 51210, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 51215, + "end": 51231, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 51397, + "end": 51406, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 51410, + "end": 51427, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 52006, + "end": 52012, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 52084, + "end": 52088, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 52092, + "end": 52102, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 52145, + "end": 52155, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 52419, + "end": 52433, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 52768, + "end": 52778, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 52804, + "end": 52810, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 52828, + "end": 52832, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 52976, + "end": 52990, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 53179, + "end": 53189, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 53690, + "end": 53704, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 53790, + "end": 53804, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 54332, + "end": 54342, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 54689, + "end": 54709, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 54848, + "end": 54858, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 55177, + "end": 55215, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 55621, + "end": 55631, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 55636, + "end": 55646, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 55661, + "end": 55671, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 55755, + "end": 55765, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 55841, + "end": 55853, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 55995, + "end": 56008, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 56084, + "end": 56098, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "445635": [ + { + "start": 12, + "end": 30, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 58, + "end": 76, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 106, + "end": 116, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 124, + "end": 135, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 137, + "end": 147, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 235, + "end": 241, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 589, + "end": 648, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 873, + "end": 887, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 1077, + "end": 1086, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 1274, + "end": 1283, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 1453, + "end": 1479, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1505, + "end": 1514, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1516, + "end": 1525, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 1616, + "end": 1627, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1680, + "end": 1689, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 2108, + "end": 2129, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2166, + "end": 2183, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2429, + "end": 2435, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 2515, + "end": 2521, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 3331, + "end": 3340, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 3374, + "end": 3384, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3457, + "end": 3467, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3553, + "end": 3567, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 4127, + "end": 4136, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 4965, + "end": 4975, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5149, + "end": 5159, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6446, + "end": 6477, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7704, + "end": 7713, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 7715, + "end": 7722, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 7727, + "end": 7731, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 7764, + "end": 7832, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7909, + "end": 7923, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 8383, + "end": 8457, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8486, + "end": 8491, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 8493, + "end": 8501, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 8506, + "end": 8511, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 9394, + "end": 9408, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 10352, + "end": 10366, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 10595, + "end": 10609, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 11471, + "end": 11485, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 11684, + "end": 11687, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11904, + "end": 11907, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12392, + "end": 12472, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14744, + "end": 14789, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14790, + "end": 14804, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 18752, + "end": 18769, + "label": "COURT" + } + ], + "87753577": [ + { + "start": 100, + "end": 130, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 155, + "end": 175, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 222, + "end": 232, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 301, + "end": 310, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 347, + "end": 364, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 588, + "end": 621, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 622, + "end": 640, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1042, + "end": 1103, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1111, + "end": 1125, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1886, + "end": 1894, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1990, + "end": 1999, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2138, + "end": 2148, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2259, + "end": 2291, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2570, + "end": 2579, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2633, + "end": 2673, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3323, + "end": 3332, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3352, + "end": 3361, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 3474, + "end": 3483, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3542, + "end": 3564, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 3810, + "end": 3818, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3919, + "end": 3928, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4591, + "end": 4602, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4679, + "end": 4689, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4961, + "end": 4970, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5152, + "end": 5181, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5315, + "end": 5338, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 5358, + "end": 5367, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5765, + "end": 5775, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5824, + "end": 5849, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 5940, + "end": 5949, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6689, + "end": 6714, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 6843, + "end": 6852, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 7051, + "end": 7060, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7256, + "end": 7282, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 7356, + "end": 7365, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7479, + "end": 7486, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 7497, + "end": 7521, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 7546, + "end": 7555, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 7566, + "end": 7591, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 7680, + "end": 7689, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7888, + "end": 7915, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 7937, + "end": 7972, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8112, + "end": 8122, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8411, + "end": 8421, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8547, + "end": 8556, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8570, + "end": 8579, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8647, + "end": 8657, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8926, + "end": 8936, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9038, + "end": 9055, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9290, + "end": 9319, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9523, + "end": 9552, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9763, + "end": 9789, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 9836, + "end": 9845, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9960, + "end": 9970, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10018, + "end": 10043, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 10065, + "end": 10074, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10625, + "end": 10634, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 10784, + "end": 10807, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 10863, + "end": 10881, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 10897, + "end": 10906, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10947, + "end": 10971, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 10976, + "end": 11001, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 11057, + "end": 11066, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11088, + "end": 11115, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 11438, + "end": 11464, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 11469, + "end": 11495, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 11552, + "end": 11578, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 11731, + "end": 11765, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 11981, + "end": 12020, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 12188, + "end": 12214, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 12289, + "end": 12316, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 12369, + "end": 12384, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 12600, + "end": 12629, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12882, + "end": 12911, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13082, + "end": 13095, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 13285, + "end": 13314, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13625, + "end": 13642, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 13658, + "end": 13725, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14372, + "end": 14382, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 14408, + "end": 14431, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 14525, + "end": 14535, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 14679, + "end": 14742, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14747, + "end": 14807, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14817, + "end": 14823, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 14897, + "end": 14907, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 15067, + "end": 15078, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15121, + "end": 15173, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15178, + "end": 15259, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15334, + "end": 15373, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15426, + "end": 15436, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 15505, + "end": 15511, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 15586, + "end": 15598, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15660, + "end": 15676, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 15826, + "end": 15845, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 15974, + "end": 15984, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 16055, + "end": 16065, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 16135, + "end": 16151, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 16177, + "end": 16189, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16277, + "end": 16293, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 16485, + "end": 16501, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 16538, + "end": 16554, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 16738, + "end": 16748, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 16773, + "end": 16783, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 16968, + "end": 17032, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17271, + "end": 17287, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 17460, + "end": 17494, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18157, + "end": 18173, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 18211, + "end": 18227, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 18589, + "end": 18605, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 18875, + "end": 18891, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 19436, + "end": 19452, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 20128, + "end": 20144, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 20160, + "end": 20176, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 20398, + "end": 20414, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 20553, + "end": 20569, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 20733, + "end": 20749, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 21098, + "end": 21114, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 21190, + "end": 21206, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 21260, + "end": 21276, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 22562, + "end": 22578, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 23305, + "end": 23321, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 24270, + "end": 24286, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 24383, + "end": 24399, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 24564, + "end": 24580, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 24705, + "end": 24721, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 25485, + "end": 25501, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 25745, + "end": 25761, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 26333, + "end": 26349, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 26491, + "end": 26507, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 26663, + "end": 26679, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 26867, + "end": 26883, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 27054, + "end": 27070, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 27212, + "end": 27228, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 27466, + "end": 27482, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 27541, + "end": 27557, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 27895, + "end": 27911, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 28110, + "end": 28126, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 28240, + "end": 28256, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 28652, + "end": 28668, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 28913, + "end": 28929, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 29146, + "end": 29162, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 29318, + "end": 29359, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 29418, + "end": 29434, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 29783, + "end": 29799, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 30403, + "end": 30419, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 30652, + "end": 30668, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 31027, + "end": 31043, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 31182, + "end": 31199, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 31322, + "end": 31338, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 31503, + "end": 31513, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 31697, + "end": 31707, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 31800, + "end": 31811, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 31961, + "end": 31972, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 32013, + "end": 32023, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 32041, + "end": 32052, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 32064, + "end": 32081, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "1661941": [ + { + "start": 12, + "end": 37, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 102, + "end": 112, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 120, + "end": 131, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 143, + "end": 154, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 159, + "end": 178, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 193, + "end": 206, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 207, + "end": 223, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 224, + "end": 240, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 241, + "end": 255, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 256, + "end": 273, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 563, + "end": 576, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 971, + "end": 1002, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1180, + "end": 1196, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1245, + "end": 1261, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1610, + "end": 1626, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1956, + "end": 1972, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2194, + "end": 2212, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2351, + "end": 2367, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2417, + "end": 2427, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2527, + "end": 2537, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2765, + "end": 2770, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2806, + "end": 2838, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2877, + "end": 2882, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3127, + "end": 3141, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3201, + "end": 3206, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3281, + "end": 3313, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3514, + "end": 3546, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3879, + "end": 3889, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7808, + "end": 7828, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 7862, + "end": 7876, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7996, + "end": 8025, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 8061, + "end": 8070, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8086, + "end": 8096, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8100, + "end": 8120, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 8122, + "end": 8133, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 8135, + "end": 8149, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 8154, + "end": 8165, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 8260, + "end": 8265, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 8332, + "end": 8353, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 8360, + "end": 8369, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8561, + "end": 8592, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 8626, + "end": 8631, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 8822, + "end": 8838, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8918, + "end": 8934, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9422, + "end": 9436, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9493, + "end": 9509, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9716, + "end": 9737, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9769, + "end": 9779, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 10017, + "end": 10037, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 10513, + "end": 10545, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 10639, + "end": 10653, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 11165, + "end": 11170, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 11357, + "end": 11377, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11398, + "end": 11408, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 11456, + "end": 11466, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 11634, + "end": 11648, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 11801, + "end": 11811, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 12051, + "end": 12061, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 12310, + "end": 12320, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 12410, + "end": 12419, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 14042, + "end": 14051, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 14144, + "end": 14154, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 14232, + "end": 14242, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 16539, + "end": 16544, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 16841, + "end": 16857, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 16937, + "end": 16949, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 17291, + "end": 17358, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17412, + "end": 17437, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 17730, + "end": 17797, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18877, + "end": 18887, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19118, + "end": 19132, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 19136, + "end": 19148, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 19154, + "end": 19186, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19598, + "end": 19608, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19980, + "end": 19994, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 20030, + "end": 20035, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 20105, + "end": 20114, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 20334, + "end": 20342, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 20573, + "end": 20589, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 20826, + "end": 20851, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 20898, + "end": 20914, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21065, + "end": 21074, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21677, + "end": 21691, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21783, + "end": 21793, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 22485, + "end": 22499, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 22737, + "end": 22742, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 22793, + "end": 22804, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 23026, + "end": 23036, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 23137, + "end": 23142, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 23229, + "end": 23238, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 23259, + "end": 23271, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 23360, + "end": 23365, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 23834, + "end": 23850, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 24106, + "end": 24138, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 24637, + "end": 24653, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 24804, + "end": 24814, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 24882, + "end": 24891, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 25029, + "end": 25038, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 25288, + "end": 25302, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 25326, + "end": 25335, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 25414, + "end": 25419, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 25538, + "end": 25552, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 25594, + "end": 25603, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 25801, + "end": 25815, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 25851, + "end": 25860, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 25962, + "end": 25978, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 26134, + "end": 26143, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 26285, + "end": 26299, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 26336, + "end": 26341, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 26397, + "end": 26406, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 26437, + "end": 26451, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 26673, + "end": 26678, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 26754, + "end": 26763, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 27491, + "end": 27505, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 27617, + "end": 27622, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 27645, + "end": 27654, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 27720, + "end": 27725, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 27737, + "end": 27751, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 28883, + "end": 28892, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 29021, + "end": 29031, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 29800, + "end": 29814, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 29960, + "end": 29974, + "label": "COURT" + } + ], + "1622258": [ + { + "start": 12, + "end": 27, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 55, + "end": 65, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 84, + "end": 94, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 102, + "end": 121, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 129, + "end": 148, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 149, + "end": 166, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 177, + "end": 189, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 190, + "end": 202, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 658, + "end": 675, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 774, + "end": 791, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 1050, + "end": 1067, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 1891, + "end": 1950, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 1952, + "end": 2005, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 2007, + "end": 2074, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 2076, + "end": 2132, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 2134, + "end": 2174, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 2176, + "end": 2229, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 2295, + "end": 2333, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 2363, + "end": 2380, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2431, + "end": 2458, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2506, + "end": 2525, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2534, + "end": 2568, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2592, + "end": 2614, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2661, + "end": 2678, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2735, + "end": 2763, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2765, + "end": 2791, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 2793, + "end": 2807, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 2838, + "end": 2851, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 2853, + "end": 2870, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 2908, + "end": 2917, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3088, + "end": 3107, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3139, + "end": 3150, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 3175, + "end": 3186, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 3188, + "end": 3199, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 3370, + "end": 3389, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3539, + "end": 3558, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 3743, + "end": 3760, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 3787, + "end": 3805, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 4038, + "end": 4048, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 4055, + "end": 4068, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 4114, + "end": 4131, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 4195, + "end": 4206, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 4281, + "end": 4300, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4339, + "end": 4352, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 4529, + "end": 4540, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 4549, + "end": 4565, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4642, + "end": 4657, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4821, + "end": 4841, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4950, + "end": 4961, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 5172, + "end": 5192, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5237, + "end": 5247, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5397, + "end": 5417, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5711, + "end": 5722, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 6098, + "end": 6109, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 7187, + "end": 7221, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7275, + "end": 7294, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7300, + "end": 7310, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7522, + "end": 7541, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11897, + "end": 11908, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 14298, + "end": 14315, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 15273, + "end": 15299, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 16147, + "end": 16157, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 16489, + "end": 16511, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16691, + "end": 16711, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 16790, + "end": 16822, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18086, + "end": 18095, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 18831, + "end": 18867, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 19442, + "end": 19453, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20636, + "end": 20649, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 20662, + "end": 20694, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 22115, + "end": 22125, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 23428, + "end": 23444, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 23574, + "end": 23611, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24155, + "end": 24168, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 24256, + "end": 24276, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 25222, + "end": 25236, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26852, + "end": 26872, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 27080, + "end": 27097, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 27101, + "end": 27138, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 27344, + "end": 27367, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 27664, + "end": 27687, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 28163, + "end": 28176, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 28287, + "end": 28299, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 28330, + "end": 28354, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 28557, + "end": 28579, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 29012, + "end": 29027, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 29086, + "end": 29098, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 29164, + "end": 29172, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 29214, + "end": 29224, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 29261, + "end": 29273, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 29329, + "end": 29342, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 29557, + "end": 29569, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 30252, + "end": 30260, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 31134, + "end": 31151, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 31155, + "end": 31172, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 31237, + "end": 31242, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 31411, + "end": 31420, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 31481, + "end": 31486, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 31550, + "end": 31559, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 31595, + "end": 31604, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 31641, + "end": 31646, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 32218, + "end": 32228, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 32834, + "end": 32854, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 33323, + "end": 33333, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 33469, + "end": 33486, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 33513, + "end": 33523, + "label": "RESP" + } + ], + "14560127": [ + { + "start": 18, + "end": 40, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 133, + "end": 148, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 482, + "end": 491, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 651, + "end": 661, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 823, + "end": 845, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 879, + "end": 895, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 942, + "end": 951, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1175, + "end": 1184, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1720, + "end": 1730, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1953, + "end": 1961, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2246, + "end": 2256, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2299, + "end": 2307, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2483, + "end": 2493, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2553, + "end": 2569, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3645, + "end": 3655, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3701, + "end": 3717, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3954, + "end": 3970, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4358, + "end": 4374, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4649, + "end": 4658, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4662, + "end": 4670, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4942, + "end": 4954, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 5009, + "end": 5017, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5210, + "end": 5267, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 6748, + "end": 6754, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 6779, + "end": 6793, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 7138, + "end": 7149, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7411, + "end": 7422, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7531, + "end": 7543, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7654, + "end": 7678, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7712, + "end": 7718, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11590, + "end": 11605, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12224, + "end": 12243, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 12275, + "end": 12280, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12421, + "end": 12472, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14755, + "end": 14767, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15218, + "end": 15224, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15239, + "end": 15255, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15594, + "end": 15600, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15646, + "end": 15657, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 15718, + "end": 15734, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 15738, + "end": 15791, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16419, + "end": 16439, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 17188, + "end": 17194, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17303, + "end": 17330, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17334, + "end": 17379, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17595, + "end": 17607, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17723, + "end": 17737, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 17763, + "end": 17776, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 17790, + "end": 17802, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 18049, + "end": 18055, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18098, + "end": 18110, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18671, + "end": 18677, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20792, + "end": 20803, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 21843, + "end": 21859, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 22184, + "end": 22200, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 23720, + "end": 23726, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 23804, + "end": 23820, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 24077, + "end": 24095, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 24115, + "end": 24129, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 24149, + "end": 24163, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 24176, + "end": 24194, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "13618343": [ + { + "start": 88, + "end": 98, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 101, + "end": 123, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 126, + "end": 149, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 195, + "end": 206, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 220, + "end": 241, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 247, + "end": 260, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 266, + "end": 270, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 276, + "end": 287, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 293, + "end": 302, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 308, + "end": 322, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 327, + "end": 332, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 337, + "end": 350, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 356, + "end": 368, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 383, + "end": 415, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 445, + "end": 458, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 477, + "end": 487, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 492, + "end": 503, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 508, + "end": 527, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 532, + "end": 561, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 571, + "end": 593, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 596, + "end": 620, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 666, + "end": 677, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 691, + "end": 712, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 718, + "end": 731, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 737, + "end": 741, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 747, + "end": 758, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 764, + "end": 773, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 779, + "end": 793, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 798, + "end": 803, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 808, + "end": 821, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 827, + "end": 839, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 854, + "end": 886, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 917, + "end": 932, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 952, + "end": 967, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 976, + "end": 998, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1001, + "end": 1025, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1071, + "end": 1082, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 1096, + "end": 1117, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 1123, + "end": 1129, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 1241, + "end": 1251, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1273, + "end": 1277, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 1283, + "end": 1294, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 1300, + "end": 1309, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 1315, + "end": 1329, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 1334, + "end": 1339, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 1344, + "end": 1357, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 1363, + "end": 1375, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 1390, + "end": 1413, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 1444, + "end": 1460, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 1480, + "end": 1490, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 1495, + "end": 1501, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 1507, + "end": 1519, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 1554, + "end": 1565, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 1575, + "end": 1586, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 1641, + "end": 1663, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1718, + "end": 1740, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1795, + "end": 1817, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1888, + "end": 1902, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1999, + "end": 2031, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2133, + "end": 2143, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2319, + "end": 2341, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2346, + "end": 2368, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2393, + "end": 2415, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2622, + "end": 2632, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2700, + "end": 2710, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3181, + "end": 3191, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3829, + "end": 3839, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3942, + "end": 3952, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4237, + "end": 4247, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4252, + "end": 4262, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4393, + "end": 4403, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4503, + "end": 4513, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4659, + "end": 4669, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4751, + "end": 4761, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4871, + "end": 4881, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5436, + "end": 5450, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 5666, + "end": 5676, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5828, + "end": 5839, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 5996, + "end": 6006, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6059, + "end": 6069, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6700, + "end": 6710, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7046, + "end": 7090, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7132, + "end": 7160, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7319, + "end": 7363, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7490, + "end": 7522, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7892, + "end": 7902, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7907, + "end": 7917, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8112, + "end": 8122, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8710, + "end": 8720, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8925, + "end": 8949, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9031, + "end": 9054, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9111, + "end": 9124, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 9260, + "end": 9270, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9848, + "end": 9858, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10330, + "end": 10340, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10522, + "end": 10527, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 10587, + "end": 10597, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10717, + "end": 10727, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10831, + "end": 10841, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11011, + "end": 11021, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11173, + "end": 11183, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11474, + "end": 11484, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11489, + "end": 11499, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11610, + "end": 11620, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11676, + "end": 11750, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 11752, + "end": 11824, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12174, + "end": 12184, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12523, + "end": 12539, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 12696, + "end": 12701, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 12770, + "end": 12780, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 13316, + "end": 13422, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 13687, + "end": 13711, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 13724, + "end": 13747, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14011, + "end": 14021, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 14100, + "end": 14110, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 14856, + "end": 14866, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15466, + "end": 15520, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16443, + "end": 16487, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16505, + "end": 16552, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16655, + "end": 16671, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17227, + "end": 17237, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 17307, + "end": 17366, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 19185, + "end": 19195, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 19331, + "end": 19341, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 19710, + "end": 19720, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 19842, + "end": 19852, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 20498, + "end": 20508, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 20951, + "end": 20961, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21232, + "end": 21242, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21394, + "end": 21404, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21494, + "end": 21504, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21618, + "end": 21628, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21756, + "end": 21766, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21840, + "end": 21850, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21886, + "end": 21896, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 22502, + "end": 22512, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 23210, + "end": 23242, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 23507, + "end": 23517, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 24036, + "end": 24109, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24539, + "end": 24549, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 24635, + "end": 24653, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 25076, + "end": 25086, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 25260, + "end": 25270, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 25337, + "end": 25347, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 25479, + "end": 25489, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 26021, + "end": 26031, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 26090, + "end": 26150, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26163, + "end": 26176, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 27554, + "end": 27564, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 27740, + "end": 27758, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 29535, + "end": 29545, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 29943, + "end": 29953, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 29989, + "end": 29999, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 30518, + "end": 30540, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 30543, + "end": 30566, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 30567, + "end": 30589, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 30592, + "end": 30616, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 30617, + "end": 30639, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 30642, + "end": 30666, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 30814, + "end": 30825, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 30827, + "end": 30841, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 30924, + "end": 30934, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "16052757": [ + { + "start": 20, + "end": 42, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 72, + "end": 106, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 110, + "end": 141, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 173, + "end": 187, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 214, + "end": 248, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 252, + "end": 283, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 301, + "end": 315, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 516, + "end": 544, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 565, + "end": 574, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 639, + "end": 665, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 693, + "end": 715, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 840, + "end": 849, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 906, + "end": 922, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 982, + "end": 996, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 1024, + "end": 1037, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 1095, + "end": 1121, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1144, + "end": 1158, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 1391, + "end": 1417, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1464, + "end": 1478, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 1490, + "end": 1499, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1555, + "end": 1564, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1578, + "end": 1587, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1707, + "end": 1716, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1720, + "end": 1729, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1742, + "end": 1751, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1864, + "end": 1873, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1928, + "end": 1937, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1985, + "end": 1994, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2052, + "end": 2060, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2064, + "end": 2073, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2206, + "end": 2222, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 2275, + "end": 2283, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2359, + "end": 2368, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2427, + "end": 2435, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2619, + "end": 2627, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2778, + "end": 2787, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2926, + "end": 2935, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3075, + "end": 3110, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3636, + "end": 3664, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 3812, + "end": 3828, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 3939, + "end": 3946, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3958, + "end": 3967, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4355, + "end": 4371, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 4395, + "end": 4404, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5403, + "end": 5412, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 5499, + "end": 5513, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 5709, + "end": 5718, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5777, + "end": 5793, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 5975, + "end": 5998, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 6010, + "end": 6032, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6076, + "end": 6099, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 6116, + "end": 6126, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6144, + "end": 6160, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 6186, + "end": 6195, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6290, + "end": 6300, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6416, + "end": 6432, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 6508, + "end": 6524, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 6548, + "end": 6557, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6674, + "end": 6683, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 6920, + "end": 6933, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7063, + "end": 7073, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7088, + "end": 7141, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 7407, + "end": 7429, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 7452, + "end": 7475, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 7549, + "end": 7557, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7566, + "end": 7576, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7713, + "end": 7722, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8125, + "end": 8135, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8873, + "end": 8889, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 9332, + "end": 9341, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9444, + "end": 9453, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 9462, + "end": 9478, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 9502, + "end": 9536, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 9541, + "end": 9575, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 10014, + "end": 10023, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10229, + "end": 10239, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10903, + "end": 10919, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 11079, + "end": 11089, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11388, + "end": 11397, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11475, + "end": 11483, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11531, + "end": 11539, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11835, + "end": 11843, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12119, + "end": 12129, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12681, + "end": 12769, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12808, + "end": 12867, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13492, + "end": 13562, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 13563, + "end": 13571, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 15786, + "end": 15796, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15806, + "end": 15816, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 15983, + "end": 15992, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 16033, + "end": 16049, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 16465, + "end": 16474, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 16620, + "end": 16631, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 17582, + "end": 17594, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 17630, + "end": 17688, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18281, + "end": 18369, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 19268, + "end": 19387, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 19617, + "end": 19626, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 19668, + "end": 19678, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 20037, + "end": 20047, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 20380, + "end": 20390, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 20421, + "end": 20437, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 20469, + "end": 20478, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21203, + "end": 21213, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 21336, + "end": 21346, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 21638, + "end": 21648, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21694, + "end": 21710, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 21892, + "end": 21902, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21910, + "end": 21920, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 22172, + "end": 22181, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 22240, + "end": 22256, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 22625, + "end": 22634, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 23485, + "end": 23495, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 23664, + "end": 23675, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 23727, + "end": 23740, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "83742049": [ + { + "start": 59, + "end": 85, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 127, + "end": 154, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 174, + "end": 205, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 476, + "end": 488, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 513, + "end": 524, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 540, + "end": 554, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 676, + "end": 710, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 729, + "end": 766, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 805, + "end": 838, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 861, + "end": 898, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 992, + "end": 1010, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 1200, + "end": 1210, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1434, + "end": 1444, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1498, + "end": 1515, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2319, + "end": 2343, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2448, + "end": 2466, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2723, + "end": 2733, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3133, + "end": 3143, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3392, + "end": 3402, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3869, + "end": 3879, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4186, + "end": 4203, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4341, + "end": 4358, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4511, + "end": 4528, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5650, + "end": 5660, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5891, + "end": 5901, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5916, + "end": 5951, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 6269, + "end": 6278, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6579, + "end": 6588, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6974, + "end": 6983, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6990, + "end": 6999, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7821, + "end": 7905, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7960, + "end": 7970, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8919, + "end": 8947, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8955, + "end": 9023, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9036, + "end": 9051, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 9064, + "end": 9074, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9133, + "end": 9143, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9215, + "end": 9226, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10618, + "end": 10688, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 11639, + "end": 11647, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12986, + "end": 13006, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 13995, + "end": 14025, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14644, + "end": 14677, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14795, + "end": 14813, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 14830, + "end": 14859, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16871, + "end": 16888, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 17112, + "end": 17158, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17496, + "end": 17564, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17566, + "end": 17647, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17652, + "end": 17726, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18049, + "end": 18137, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18423, + "end": 18433, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 18652, + "end": 18662, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19094, + "end": 19104, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19601, + "end": 19611, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19775, + "end": 19781, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 19823, + "end": 19835, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 19839, + "end": 19849, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 19893, + "end": 19917, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 19938, + "end": 19968, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20376, + "end": 20409, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20789, + "end": 20839, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20904, + "end": 20929, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 22997, + "end": 23007, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 23022, + "end": 23057, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 24212, + "end": 24222, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 24290, + "end": 24300, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 24448, + "end": 24458, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 24462, + "end": 24472, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 24575, + "end": 24585, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 24620, + "end": 24637, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 24661, + "end": 24681, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 24846, + "end": 24856, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 24888, + "end": 24908, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 25504, + "end": 25514, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 25553, + "end": 25563, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 25567, + "end": 25577, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 25740, + "end": 25757, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 26014, + "end": 26086, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26267, + "end": 26285, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 26659, + "end": 26669, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 26673, + "end": 26690, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 26951, + "end": 26968, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 27222, + "end": 27239, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 27308, + "end": 27343, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 27728, + "end": 27739, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 27832, + "end": 27842, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "1601209": [ + { + "start": 73, + "end": 105, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 122, + "end": 148, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 150, + "end": 158, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 177, + "end": 193, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 282, + "end": 291, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 316, + "end": 329, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 363, + "end": 375, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 411, + "end": 422, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 729, + "end": 740, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 915, + "end": 941, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1020, + "end": 1060, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1095, + "end": 1104, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1217, + "end": 1230, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 1294, + "end": 1297, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1420, + "end": 1433, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 1531, + "end": 1534, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1791, + "end": 1804, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 2016, + "end": 2027, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 2137, + "end": 2150, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 2765, + "end": 2776, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 3665, + "end": 3678, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 4487, + "end": 4495, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4781, + "end": 4790, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4860, + "end": 4870, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4874, + "end": 4883, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5101, + "end": 5111, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5192, + "end": 5205, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 5310, + "end": 5321, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 5500, + "end": 5511, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 5592, + "end": 5602, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5734, + "end": 5747, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 5771, + "end": 5782, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 8208, + "end": 8277, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 13892, + "end": 13944, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 13955, + "end": 13968, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14427, + "end": 14491, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14793, + "end": 14796, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15988, + "end": 16000, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16038, + "end": 16055, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16076, + "end": 16088, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16124, + "end": 16145, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16150, + "end": 16171, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16195, + "end": 16209, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18048, + "end": 18105, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18186, + "end": 18189, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18324, + "end": 18338, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 18465, + "end": 18468, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18528, + "end": 18531, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18581, + "end": 18591, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 18731, + "end": 18769, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18811, + "end": 18821, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 18979, + "end": 18982, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 19188, + "end": 19201, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 19217, + "end": 19230, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 19255, + "end": 19268, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 19455, + "end": 19468, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 19570, + "end": 19581, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 19712, + "end": 19725, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 19781, + "end": 19792, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 19919, + "end": 19932, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 19971, + "end": 19984, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 20032, + "end": 20042, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 20134, + "end": 20145, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 20348, + "end": 20361, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 20385, + "end": 20398, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 20660, + "end": 20671, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 20777, + "end": 20788, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 20950, + "end": 20961, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 21808, + "end": 21826, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21917, + "end": 21935, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 22249, + "end": 22267, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 22334, + "end": 22353, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 22749, + "end": 22760, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 22892, + "end": 22903, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 22985, + "end": 22997, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 23001, + "end": 23014, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 23139, + "end": 23150, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 23345, + "end": 23358, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 23363, + "end": 23374, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 23437, + "end": 23450, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 23505, + "end": 23518, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 23593, + "end": 23604, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 23812, + "end": 23825, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 23924, + "end": 23937, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 24026, + "end": 24039, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 24150, + "end": 24163, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 24196, + "end": 24207, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 24552, + "end": 24565, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 24590, + "end": 24601, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 24785, + "end": 24796, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 25067, + "end": 25078, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 25309, + "end": 25320, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 25348, + "end": 25361, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 25428, + "end": 25444, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 25478, + "end": 25491, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 25504, + "end": 25521, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "1404484": [ + { + "start": 52, + "end": 78, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 104, + "end": 114, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 122, + "end": 131, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 145, + "end": 154, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 200, + "end": 213, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 214, + "end": 230, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 248, + "end": 267, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 270, + "end": 288, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 683, + "end": 709, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 767, + "end": 785, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 936, + "end": 953, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1032, + "end": 1049, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1171, + "end": 1181, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1232, + "end": 1245, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1402, + "end": 1428, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2518, + "end": 2528, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2675, + "end": 2699, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 2727, + "end": 2771, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 2787, + "end": 2854, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 2856, + "end": 2921, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 2996, + "end": 3059, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 3469, + "end": 3492, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3549, + "end": 3605, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 3637, + "end": 3652, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3654, + "end": 3676, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 3681, + "end": 3689, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5184, + "end": 5201, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5207, + "end": 5224, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 6028, + "end": 6040, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6207, + "end": 6219, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6751, + "end": 6817, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 6823, + "end": 6884, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 6942, + "end": 6972, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 7032, + "end": 7048, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7071, + "end": 7081, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7132, + "end": 7170, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 7172, + "end": 7184, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 7186, + "end": 7200, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 7205, + "end": 7215, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 7335, + "end": 7344, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7388, + "end": 7397, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7443, + "end": 7475, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7505, + "end": 7522, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7570, + "end": 7576, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7721, + "end": 7727, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8031, + "end": 8041, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8244, + "end": 8254, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8377, + "end": 8400, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 8490, + "end": 8502, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8906, + "end": 8921, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10089, + "end": 10104, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10242, + "end": 10281, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11809, + "end": 11826, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 11883, + "end": 11896, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 15510, + "end": 15523, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 15827, + "end": 15846, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 15951, + "end": 15970, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 17242, + "end": 17258, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 19675, + "end": 19685, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 19980, + "end": 19990, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 20603, + "end": 20613, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 21115, + "end": 21139, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 21570, + "end": 21610, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 21699, + "end": 21716, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 22119, + "end": 22135, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 22717, + "end": 22736, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 22967, + "end": 22984, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 23370, + "end": 23389, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 23511, + "end": 23525, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 23614, + "end": 23633, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 23929, + "end": 23941, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 24167, + "end": 24179, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 24274, + "end": 24295, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 24444, + "end": 24470, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 24592, + "end": 24609, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 24617, + "end": 24634, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 25034, + "end": 25044, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 25149, + "end": 25159, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 25382, + "end": 25388, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 25503, + "end": 25513, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 25687, + "end": 25697, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 25870, + "end": 25880, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 26079, + "end": 26089, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 26466, + "end": 26476, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 26548, + "end": 26554, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 26653, + "end": 26663, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 26734, + "end": 26744, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 26966, + "end": 26978, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 26984, + "end": 26994, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 27413, + "end": 27423, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 27762, + "end": 27775, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 27867, + "end": 27877, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 28417, + "end": 28429, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 28894, + "end": 28907, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 30487, + "end": 30505, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 30510, + "end": 30524, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 30571, + "end": 30577, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 30704, + "end": 30718, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 30723, + "end": 30740, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 30802, + "end": 30808, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 30962, + "end": 30975, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 31009, + "end": 31019, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 31139, + "end": 31149, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 31519, + "end": 31529, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 31566, + "end": 31590, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 32207, + "end": 32217, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 32263, + "end": 32286, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 32324, + "end": 32349, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 32358, + "end": 32384, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 32486, + "end": 32512, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 33147, + "end": 33168, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 33174, + "end": 33194, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 33200, + "end": 33219, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 33225, + "end": 33246, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 33325, + "end": 33335, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 38150, + "end": 38167, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 38351, + "end": 38368, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 41046, + "end": 41059, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 41065, + "end": 41078, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 44087, + "end": 44092, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 48289, + "end": 48294, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 49531, + "end": 49541, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 50162, + "end": 50182, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 50186, + "end": 50202, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 50612, + "end": 50622, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 50639, + "end": 50652, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 51879, + "end": 51889, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 52046, + "end": 52056, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 52341, + "end": 52351, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 52638, + "end": 52648, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 56005, + "end": 56011, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 57906, + "end": 57913, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 58124, + "end": 58144, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 58198, + "end": 58212, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 58519, + "end": 58525, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 58859, + "end": 58865, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 59098, + "end": 59108, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 59342, + "end": 59352, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 59357, + "end": 59369, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 59892, + "end": 59915, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 60187, + "end": 60208, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 60418, + "end": 60452, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 60466, + "end": 60474, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 60512, + "end": 60520, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 60577, + "end": 60583, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 60741, + "end": 60769, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 60832, + "end": 60842, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 60898, + "end": 60921, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 61662, + "end": 61672, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 61828, + "end": 61854, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 63408, + "end": 63455, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 63473, + "end": 63486, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 63552, + "end": 63572, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 63617, + "end": 63640, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 63844, + "end": 63854, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 64153, + "end": 64163, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 64479, + "end": 64533, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 64985, + "end": 65021, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 65027, + "end": 65036, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 65579, + "end": 65606, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 66031, + "end": 66041, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 66253, + "end": 66259, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 66734, + "end": 66747, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 66782, + "end": 66792, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 67035, + "end": 67045, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 67094, + "end": 67144, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 67636, + "end": 67670, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 67797, + "end": 67825, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 67945, + "end": 67951, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 68003, + "end": 68031, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 68364, + "end": 68376, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 69303, + "end": 69336, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 69722, + "end": 69768, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 69811, + "end": 69817, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 69844, + "end": 69870, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 70584, + "end": 70597, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 70632, + "end": 70644, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 70854, + "end": 70877, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 71099, + "end": 71117, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 71129, + "end": 71145, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 71165, + "end": 71198, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 71396, + "end": 71409, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 72416, + "end": 72433, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 72445, + "end": 72462, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 72494, + "end": 72511, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 72608, + "end": 72625, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 73469, + "end": 73486, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 73617, + "end": 73656, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 74400, + "end": 74417, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 75404, + "end": 75414, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 76688, + "end": 76700, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 81399, + "end": 81412, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 81696, + "end": 81715, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 81936, + "end": 81946, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 82268, + "end": 82278, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 82439, + "end": 82451, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 83956, + "end": 83966, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 84241, + "end": 84267, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 84292, + "end": 84302, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 84363, + "end": 84397, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 84408, + "end": 84417, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 84604, + "end": 84644, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 84731, + "end": 84743, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 85681, + "end": 85693, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 86270, + "end": 86288, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 87522, + "end": 87532, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 87628, + "end": 87638, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 87757, + "end": 87783, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 88371, + "end": 88384, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 88442, + "end": 88452, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 88628, + "end": 88641, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 88862, + "end": 88872, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 89129, + "end": 89142, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 89423, + "end": 89435, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 89925, + "end": 89938, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 91239, + "end": 91252, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 91534, + "end": 91569, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 91902, + "end": 91920, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 92078, + "end": 92104, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 92333, + "end": 92343, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 92347, + "end": 92363, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 92491, + "end": 92508, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 92619, + "end": 92636, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 93912, + "end": 93922, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 93930, + "end": 93947, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 94224, + "end": 94230, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 94266, + "end": 94283, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 95116, + "end": 95121, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 96050, + "end": 96067, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 96106, + "end": 96123, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 98181, + "end": 98194, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 98942, + "end": 98955, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 99526, + "end": 99539, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 100414, + "end": 100430, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 100823, + "end": 100848, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 100855, + "end": 100872, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 100877, + "end": 100913, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 101184, + "end": 101202, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 102154, + "end": 102172, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 102249, + "end": 102265, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 102379, + "end": 102395, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 103233, + "end": 103243, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 103351, + "end": 103369, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 104390, + "end": 104403, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 105091, + "end": 105107, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 107115, + "end": 107125, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 107474, + "end": 107479, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 108239, + "end": 108244, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 108276, + "end": 108288, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 109610, + "end": 109615, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 110300, + "end": 110310, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 111421, + "end": 111426, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 111736, + "end": 111746, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 111780, + "end": 111790, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 112081, + "end": 112091, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 112299, + "end": 112309, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 112495, + "end": 112530, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 112577, + "end": 112587, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 112686, + "end": 112701, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 113054, + "end": 113064, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 113215, + "end": 113225, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 113920, + "end": 113930, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 114023, + "end": 114043, + "label": "CASENO" + } + ], + "90251163": [ + { + "start": 75, + "end": 104, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 121, + "end": 146, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 148, + "end": 162, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 183, + "end": 209, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 319, + "end": 353, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 355, + "end": 359, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 503, + "end": 522, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 645, + "end": 666, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 686, + "end": 689, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 755, + "end": 758, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 838, + "end": 848, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 874, + "end": 908, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 938, + "end": 948, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 954, + "end": 964, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1035, + "end": 1058, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 1062, + "end": 1081, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1123, + "end": 1163, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1237, + "end": 1247, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1301, + "end": 1314, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1318, + "end": 1328, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1387, + "end": 1400, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1443, + "end": 1453, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1509, + "end": 1519, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1622, + "end": 1634, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1798, + "end": 1823, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1914, + "end": 1924, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2106, + "end": 2116, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2140, + "end": 2161, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2181, + "end": 2184, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2207, + "end": 2210, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2274, + "end": 2308, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2484, + "end": 2504, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 2562, + "end": 2582, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 2743, + "end": 2762, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2853, + "end": 2857, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3094, + "end": 3128, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3130, + "end": 3134, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3276, + "end": 3280, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3421, + "end": 3425, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3449, + "end": 3459, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3725, + "end": 3729, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3870, + "end": 3874, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 4485, + "end": 4489, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 4528, + "end": 4538, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4726, + "end": 4730, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 4890, + "end": 4907, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 5053, + "end": 5063, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5267, + "end": 5284, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 5401, + "end": 5405, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5418, + "end": 5437, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5739, + "end": 5756, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 5858, + "end": 5875, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 6155, + "end": 6172, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 6615, + "end": 6619, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 6779, + "end": 6800, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 6804, + "end": 6814, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6858, + "end": 6861, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6925, + "end": 6959, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7046, + "end": 7069, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 7091, + "end": 7110, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 7227, + "end": 7267, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7269, + "end": 7273, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7423, + "end": 7440, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 7473, + "end": 7489, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7510, + "end": 7527, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 7562, + "end": 7572, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7606, + "end": 7622, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7709, + "end": 7732, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 7737, + "end": 7747, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7753, + "end": 7769, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7872, + "end": 7882, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7907, + "end": 7917, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7997, + "end": 8007, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8151, + "end": 8161, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8939, + "end": 8950, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 8959, + "end": 8980, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 9075, + "end": 9096, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9298, + "end": 9321, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 9480, + "end": 9490, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9492, + "end": 9502, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9507, + "end": 9517, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9689, + "end": 9712, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 9752, + "end": 9764, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 9878, + "end": 9899, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9905, + "end": 9917, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 9988, + "end": 10011, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 10092, + "end": 10096, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10242, + "end": 10253, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 10288, + "end": 10299, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 10418, + "end": 10452, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 10454, + "end": 10458, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 10698, + "end": 10715, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 10752, + "end": 10756, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 10882, + "end": 10886, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 10908, + "end": 10912, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 10964, + "end": 10981, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 11149, + "end": 11166, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 11237, + "end": 11260, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 11290, + "end": 11307, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 11557, + "end": 11580, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 11592, + "end": 11602, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 12065, + "end": 12088, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 12165, + "end": 12188, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 12359, + "end": 12382, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 12672, + "end": 12682, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12684, + "end": 12694, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12699, + "end": 12709, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12744, + "end": 12754, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 13139, + "end": 13149, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 13151, + "end": 13161, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 13166, + "end": 13176, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 13437, + "end": 13444, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13517, + "end": 13527, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 13810, + "end": 13827, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 14047, + "end": 14068, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 14133, + "end": 14144, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 14150, + "end": 14171, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 14215, + "end": 14238, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 14310, + "end": 14317, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 14866, + "end": 14871, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 14877, + "end": 14884, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 14904, + "end": 14914, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 15238, + "end": 15241, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15251, + "end": 15254, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15277, + "end": 15305, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15350, + "end": 15384, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15437, + "end": 15447, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15511, + "end": 15532, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16052, + "end": 16092, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16205, + "end": 16215, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 16645, + "end": 16655, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 16775, + "end": 16798, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 16938, + "end": 16959, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17074, + "end": 17086, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 17203, + "end": 17207, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17384, + "end": 17388, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17500, + "end": 17504, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17709, + "end": 17713, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17892, + "end": 17896, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17963, + "end": 17967, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18403, + "end": 18426, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 18908, + "end": 18931, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 19556, + "end": 19582, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 19718, + "end": 19741, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 19857, + "end": 19880, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 20151, + "end": 20174, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 20312, + "end": 20315, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20324, + "end": 20327, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20387, + "end": 20415, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20495, + "end": 20499, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20790, + "end": 20830, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20836, + "end": 20876, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 21304, + "end": 21344, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 21785, + "end": 21826, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 21979, + "end": 21983, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 22120, + "end": 22160, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 22378, + "end": 22382, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 22468, + "end": 22472, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 22578, + "end": 22582, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 22683, + "end": 22687, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 22965, + "end": 22969, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 23461, + "end": 23465, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 23628, + "end": 23645, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 23720, + "end": 23751, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 23779, + "end": 23813, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 23884, + "end": 23894, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 23911, + "end": 23939, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 23986, + "end": 23990, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 24032, + "end": 24042, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 24062, + "end": 24066, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 24128, + "end": 24132, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 24450, + "end": 24454, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 24741, + "end": 24751, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 24771, + "end": 24775, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 25103, + "end": 25113, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 25137, + "end": 25147, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 25199, + "end": 25203, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 25545, + "end": 25549, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 26541, + "end": 26573, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 26843, + "end": 26847, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 26918, + "end": 26921, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 26959, + "end": 26962, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 27463, + "end": 27467, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 27883, + "end": 27887, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 27908, + "end": 27912, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 28414, + "end": 28418, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 28587, + "end": 28591, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 28703, + "end": 28707, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 28713, + "end": 28731, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 29389, + "end": 29393, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 30009, + "end": 30013, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 30633, + "end": 30637, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 30643, + "end": 30661, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 30674, + "end": 30907, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 30928, + "end": 30932, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 31029, + "end": 31033, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 31170, + "end": 31188, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 31406, + "end": 31410, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 31905, + "end": 31923, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 31936, + "end": 32143, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 32445, + "end": 32457, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 32479, + "end": 32483, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 32968, + "end": 32972, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 33077, + "end": 33081, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 33334, + "end": 33338, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 33545, + "end": 33549, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 33563, + "end": 33567, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 33776, + "end": 33780, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 33826, + "end": 33830, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 33846, + "end": 33850, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 33984, + "end": 33988, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 34065, + "end": 34069, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 34100, + "end": 34132, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 34237, + "end": 34241, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 34313, + "end": 34317, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 35009, + "end": 35025, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 35173, + "end": 35186, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 35265, + "end": 35286, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 35554, + "end": 35570, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 35580, + "end": 35596, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 35636, + "end": 35652, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 35676, + "end": 35692, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 35901, + "end": 35933, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 37447, + "end": 37464, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 37494, + "end": 37504, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 37526, + "end": 37529, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 37552, + "end": 37555, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 37628, + "end": 37656, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 37704, + "end": 37716, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 37847, + "end": 37851, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 37930, + "end": 37933, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 37942, + "end": 37945, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 37968, + "end": 37996, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 38043, + "end": 38047, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 38134, + "end": 38144, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 38156, + "end": 38166, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 38263, + "end": 38267, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 38323, + "end": 38335, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 38498, + "end": 38501, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 38518, + "end": 38521, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 38540, + "end": 38568, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 38714, + "end": 38718, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 38748, + "end": 38776, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 38830, + "end": 38858, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 39106, + "end": 39134, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 39229, + "end": 39257, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 39645, + "end": 39649, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 39934, + "end": 39937, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 39976, + "end": 39979, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 40080, + "end": 40084, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 40127, + "end": 40137, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 40183, + "end": 40193, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 40223, + "end": 40251, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 40354, + "end": 40364, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 40443, + "end": 40471, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 40645, + "end": 40648, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 40657, + "end": 40660, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 40685, + "end": 40713, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 40756, + "end": 40766, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 40778, + "end": 40788, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 40980, + "end": 40992, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 41169, + "end": 41173, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 41243, + "end": 41264, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 41297, + "end": 41309, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 41529, + "end": 41532, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 41538, + "end": 41541, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 41564, + "end": 41592, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 41625, + "end": 41653, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 41690, + "end": 41693, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 41710, + "end": 41713, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 41794, + "end": 41804, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 41824, + "end": 41852, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 41927, + "end": 41937, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 41956, + "end": 41984, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 42062, + "end": 42090, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 42144, + "end": 42148, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 42313, + "end": 42334, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 42480, + "end": 42508, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 42761, + "end": 42784, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 43127, + "end": 43155, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 43192, + "end": 43196, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 43250, + "end": 43273, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 43322, + "end": 43326, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 43466, + "end": 43470, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 43649, + "end": 43672, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 44039, + "end": 44043, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 44110, + "end": 44138, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 44224, + "end": 44252, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 44353, + "end": 44357, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 44514, + "end": 44518, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 44635, + "end": 44639, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 45078, + "end": 45101, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 45858, + "end": 45881, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 46029, + "end": 46052, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 46176, + "end": 46187, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 46269, + "end": 46276, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 46940, + "end": 46952, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 47049, + "end": 47072, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 47268, + "end": 47275, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 47377, + "end": 47381, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 47948, + "end": 47955, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 48038, + "end": 48045, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 48485, + "end": 48497, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 48589, + "end": 48649, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 48824, + "end": 48832, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 48838, + "end": 48851, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 49188, + "end": 49192, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 49760, + "end": 49773, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 49974, + "end": 49997, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 50743, + "end": 50747, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 50788, + "end": 50800, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 52016, + "end": 52020, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 52584, + "end": 52610, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 52667, + "end": 52680, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 52755, + "end": 52765, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 52854, + "end": 52867, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 52918, + "end": 52925, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 53903, + "end": 53916, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 54743, + "end": 54747, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 54826, + "end": 54836, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 54960, + "end": 54964, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 55056, + "end": 55060, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 55573, + "end": 55577, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 56427, + "end": 56434, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 56832, + "end": 56851, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 57175, + "end": 57182, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 57871, + "end": 57881, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 58754, + "end": 58777, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 58918, + "end": 58928, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 60279, + "end": 60302, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 60536, + "end": 60559, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 60640, + "end": 60663, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 61092, + "end": 61115, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 61245, + "end": 61268, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 61583, + "end": 61593, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 61595, + "end": 61605, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 61610, + "end": 61620, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 62525, + "end": 62548, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 63803, + "end": 63807, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 64543, + "end": 64550, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 65024, + "end": 65047, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 65056, + "end": 65129, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 66161, + "end": 66179, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 66217, + "end": 66230, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 66327, + "end": 66342, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 66363, + "end": 66370, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 66550, + "end": 66566, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 66571, + "end": 66586, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 66884, + "end": 66900, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 68193, + "end": 68211, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 68305, + "end": 68328, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 69265, + "end": 69288, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 69794, + "end": 69807, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 70702, + "end": 70725, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 70893, + "end": 70903, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 70956, + "end": 70963, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 71060, + "end": 71070, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 71223, + "end": 71246, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 71493, + "end": 71503, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 72058, + "end": 72068, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 72070, + "end": 72080, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 72085, + "end": 72095, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 72104, + "end": 72127, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 72261, + "end": 72284, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 72476, + "end": 72497, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 73262, + "end": 73269, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 74220, + "end": 74241, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 74471, + "end": 74492, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 74516, + "end": 74537, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 74709, + "end": 74730, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 74944, + "end": 74957, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 75034, + "end": 75055, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 75291, + "end": 75314, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 75676, + "end": 75699, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 75855, + "end": 75865, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 76017, + "end": 76029, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 76103, + "end": 76115, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 76353, + "end": 76360, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 76999, + "end": 77020, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 77291, + "end": 77295, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 77717, + "end": 77800, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 78443, + "end": 78456, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 79678, + "end": 79727, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 81138, + "end": 81166, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 81224, + "end": 81237, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 81772, + "end": 81800, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 81981, + "end": 81994, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 82581, + "end": 82588, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 82640, + "end": 82647, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 82849, + "end": 82875, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 83144, + "end": 83148, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 84761, + "end": 84774, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 85746, + "end": 85769, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 85938, + "end": 85961, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 86007, + "end": 86024, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 86083, + "end": 86096, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 86694, + "end": 86717, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 87283, + "end": 87290, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 87473, + "end": 87496, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 87979, + "end": 88002, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 88693, + "end": 88703, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 88751, + "end": 88763, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 88776, + "end": 88794, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "1011232": [ + { + "start": 12, + "end": 31, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 93, + "end": 103, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 111, + "end": 128, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 136, + "end": 153, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 154, + "end": 171, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 172, + "end": 186, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 197, + "end": 210, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 211, + "end": 227, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 228, + "end": 244, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 250, + "end": 284, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 291, + "end": 319, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 539, + "end": 554, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 618, + "end": 652, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 740, + "end": 760, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 849, + "end": 858, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 912, + "end": 928, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 991, + "end": 1001, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1007, + "end": 1017, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1065, + "end": 1085, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1103, + "end": 1126, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1188, + "end": 1216, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1330, + "end": 1339, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1416, + "end": 1432, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1496, + "end": 1506, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2834, + "end": 2854, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 4900, + "end": 4914, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 4935, + "end": 4963, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5180, + "end": 5194, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5203, + "end": 5231, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5388, + "end": 5402, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5618, + "end": 5628, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5783, + "end": 5803, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 6250, + "end": 6264, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 6338, + "end": 6366, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 6573, + "end": 6593, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 6658, + "end": 6672, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 6796, + "end": 6806, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7026, + "end": 7046, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 7255, + "end": 7262, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7277, + "end": 7287, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7291, + "end": 7299, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 7346, + "end": 7357, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 7378, + "end": 7388, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 7393, + "end": 7409, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 7474, + "end": 7486, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 7558, + "end": 7578, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7585, + "end": 7646, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7779, + "end": 7789, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7848, + "end": 7868, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 8164, + "end": 8177, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8493, + "end": 8505, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 8796, + "end": 8806, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9597, + "end": 9617, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 10579, + "end": 10589, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 10624, + "end": 10633, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 10953, + "end": 10967, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 11077, + "end": 11087, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 11176, + "end": 11186, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 11534, + "end": 11554, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 11640, + "end": 11649, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11653, + "end": 11693, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 11728, + "end": 11748, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 12062, + "end": 12087, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 12165, + "end": 12171, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 12221, + "end": 12249, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 12279, + "end": 12307, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 12574, + "end": 12594, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 12712, + "end": 12740, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 12789, + "end": 12795, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 12951, + "end": 12957, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 13000, + "end": 13028, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 13167, + "end": 13173, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 13267, + "end": 13295, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 16246, + "end": 16256, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 16409, + "end": 16422, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 16426, + "end": 16444, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18922, + "end": 18934, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 20965, + "end": 20979, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 21011, + "end": 21039, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 21046, + "end": 21060, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 21091, + "end": 21116, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 21155, + "end": 21171, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 21190, + "end": 21204, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 21298, + "end": 21313, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 21341, + "end": 21358, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 21509, + "end": 21515, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 21517, + "end": 21545, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 21709, + "end": 21723, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 21903, + "end": 21917, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 21940, + "end": 21968, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 22299, + "end": 22319, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 22370, + "end": 22390, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 22470, + "end": 22479, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 22536, + "end": 22552, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 22621, + "end": 22631, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 22636, + "end": 22647, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 22788, + "end": 22808, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 22921, + "end": 22946, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 23330, + "end": 23355, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 23426, + "end": 23446, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 23613, + "end": 23649, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 24039, + "end": 24049, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 24181, + "end": 24195, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 24224, + "end": 24250, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 24273, + "end": 24288, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 24314, + "end": 24340, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 24507, + "end": 24535, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 24568, + "end": 24582, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 24644, + "end": 24667, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 24704, + "end": 24718, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 24946, + "end": 24960, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 25109, + "end": 25134, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 25325, + "end": 25334, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 25411, + "end": 25427, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 25491, + "end": 25501, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 25796, + "end": 25810, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 26063, + "end": 26077, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 26202, + "end": 26216, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 26319, + "end": 26329, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 26382, + "end": 26392, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 26625, + "end": 26637, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 26882, + "end": 26902, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 27543, + "end": 27563, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 27621, + "end": 27631, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 27826, + "end": 27840, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 27909, + "end": 27929, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 27997, + "end": 28009, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 28205, + "end": 28233, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 28435, + "end": 28455, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 28520, + "end": 28534, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 28773, + "end": 28801, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 28926, + "end": 28946, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 29174, + "end": 29194, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 29361, + "end": 29371, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 29662, + "end": 29682, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 29786, + "end": 29806, + "label": "AUTH" + } + ], + "156503": [ + { + "start": 12, + "end": 34, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 94, + "end": 104, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 112, + "end": 125, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 137, + "end": 150, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 155, + "end": 176, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 191, + "end": 204, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 205, + "end": 221, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 222, + "end": 244, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 245, + "end": 259, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 260, + "end": 277, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 283, + "end": 314, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 922, + "end": 933, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 964, + "end": 980, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1670, + "end": 1684, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 1742, + "end": 1752, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1758, + "end": 1774, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1832, + "end": 1842, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1848, + "end": 1858, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2073, + "end": 2083, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2127, + "end": 2141, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 2200, + "end": 2210, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2264, + "end": 2280, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2331, + "end": 2341, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4705, + "end": 4715, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4724, + "end": 4788, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 4790, + "end": 4840, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 4842, + "end": 4910, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 4912, + "end": 4954, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 4956, + "end": 5032, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 5034, + "end": 5085, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 5087, + "end": 5121, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 5123, + "end": 5177, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 5179, + "end": 5220, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 5225, + "end": 5266, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 5281, + "end": 5348, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 5408, + "end": 5442, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 5478, + "end": 5487, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5495, + "end": 5513, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5517, + "end": 5569, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 5571, + "end": 5585, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 5590, + "end": 5600, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 5625, + "end": 5636, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 5672, + "end": 5685, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 5687, + "end": 5698, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 5700, + "end": 5715, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 5721, + "end": 5734, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 5740, + "end": 5752, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 5757, + "end": 5769, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 5834, + "end": 5853, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 5930, + "end": 5951, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6034, + "end": 6052, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6056, + "end": 6108, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 6121, + "end": 6131, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6172, + "end": 6180, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6226, + "end": 6278, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 6307, + "end": 6314, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6407, + "end": 6445, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 6696, + "end": 6705, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7022, + "end": 7032, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7218, + "end": 7229, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7253, + "end": 7269, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7421, + "end": 7451, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8315, + "end": 8329, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 8464, + "end": 8480, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 8566, + "end": 8576, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8934, + "end": 8948, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 8958, + "end": 8974, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 8991, + "end": 9005, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 9151, + "end": 9165, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 9301, + "end": 9315, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 9388, + "end": 9398, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9566, + "end": 9576, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9712, + "end": 9722, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9872, + "end": 9882, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 10140, + "end": 10154, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 10352, + "end": 10362, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 10681, + "end": 10691, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 11829, + "end": 11842, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13816, + "end": 13828, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16014, + "end": 16031, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 16069, + "end": 16079, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 16136, + "end": 16146, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 16397, + "end": 16413, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 17203, + "end": 17222, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17546, + "end": 17566, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17690, + "end": 17710, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18527, + "end": 18534, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18540, + "end": 18545, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18745, + "end": 18764, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18875, + "end": 18887, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18970, + "end": 18982, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 19062, + "end": 19085, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 19995, + "end": 20002, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 20010, + "end": 20037, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20553, + "end": 20576, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20605, + "end": 20617, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 23903, + "end": 23912, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 23919, + "end": 23969, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24104, + "end": 24127, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 24132, + "end": 24142, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 24580, + "end": 24648, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 25824, + "end": 25831, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 25941, + "end": 25952, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 26843, + "end": 26853, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 27292, + "end": 27306, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 27337, + "end": 27353, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 28070, + "end": 28080, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 28227, + "end": 28234, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 28276, + "end": 28283, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 28425, + "end": 28468, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 29061, + "end": 29129, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 30782, + "end": 30797, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 30923, + "end": 30946, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 31075, + "end": 31082, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 31762, + "end": 31785, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 32401, + "end": 32408, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 32420, + "end": 32427, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 32485, + "end": 32495, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 32507, + "end": 32538, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 32601, + "end": 32642, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 32647, + "end": 32688, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 32748, + "end": 32758, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 32796, + "end": 32811, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 32868, + "end": 32877, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 33773, + "end": 33783, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 34055, + "end": 34065, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 34484, + "end": 34494, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 35399, + "end": 35407, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 35768, + "end": 35784, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 36392, + "end": 36406, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 36607, + "end": 36617, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 38131, + "end": 38145, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 38240, + "end": 38254, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 39007, + "end": 39017, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 39616, + "end": 39626, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 39665, + "end": 39679, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 39846, + "end": 39862, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 39902, + "end": 39916, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 40035, + "end": 40045, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 40169, + "end": 40179, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 40381, + "end": 40391, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 40721, + "end": 40735, + "label": "RESP" + } + ], + "661155": [ + { + "start": 10, + "end": 42, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 43, + "end": 75, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 88, + "end": 103, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 120, + "end": 140, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 159, + "end": 169, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 177, + "end": 187, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 189, + "end": 199, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 202, + "end": 214, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 226, + "end": 231, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 301, + "end": 313, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 347, + "end": 399, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 628, + "end": 649, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1190, + "end": 1216, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2166, + "end": 2179, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2842, + "end": 2857, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2971, + "end": 2981, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3052, + "end": 3105, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 3158, + "end": 3172, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3199, + "end": 3209, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3258, + "end": 3304, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4035, + "end": 4044, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4053, + "end": 4072, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4394, + "end": 4404, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 4696, + "end": 4717, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5190, + "end": 5202, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5219, + "end": 5231, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5436, + "end": 5456, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 6522, + "end": 6569, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 6924, + "end": 6934, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9154, + "end": 9207, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9256, + "end": 9268, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9292, + "end": 9355, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9720, + "end": 9746, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12107, + "end": 12191, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12287, + "end": 12330, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12628, + "end": 12674, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12845, + "end": 12905, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 13602, + "end": 13630, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 14120, + "end": 14152, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15119, + "end": 15136, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16375, + "end": 16385, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 16741, + "end": 16764, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16922, + "end": 16945, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17287, + "end": 17299, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18089, + "end": 18099, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 18103, + "end": 18122, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 18178, + "end": 18197, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 18215, + "end": 18225, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 19209, + "end": 19224, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 19586, + "end": 19596, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 21177, + "end": 21189, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 23840, + "end": 23852, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 24115, + "end": 24125, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 24373, + "end": 24443, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 25251, + "end": 25263, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 25698, + "end": 25728, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 27632, + "end": 27642, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 27728, + "end": 27829, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 27866, + "end": 27885, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 33483, + "end": 33495, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 33693, + "end": 33705, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 33751, + "end": 33765, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 33882, + "end": 33894, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 34040, + "end": 34052, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 34667, + "end": 34725, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 34859, + "end": 34871, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 35061, + "end": 35073, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 35263, + "end": 35273, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 35277, + "end": 35291, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 35325, + "end": 35335, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 35865, + "end": 35877, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 36037, + "end": 36047, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 36051, + "end": 36072, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 36260, + "end": 36272, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 36368, + "end": 36381, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 36445, + "end": 36462, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 36662, + "end": 36675, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 37338, + "end": 37350, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 37443, + "end": 37455, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 37912, + "end": 37922, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 37926, + "end": 37936, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 38069, + "end": 38079, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 38083, + "end": 38104, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 38513, + "end": 38525, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 39421, + "end": 39453, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 40146, + "end": 40178, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 40260, + "end": 40314, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 40952, + "end": 40971, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 41201, + "end": 41253, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 42929, + "end": 42939, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 43137, + "end": 43147, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 44016, + "end": 44039, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 44323, + "end": 44346, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 44373, + "end": 44383, + "label": "COURT" + } + ], + "1236969": [ + { + "start": 70, + "end": 99, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 116, + "end": 139, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 146, + "end": 170, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 192, + "end": 214, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 247, + "end": 257, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 343, + "end": 380, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 676, + "end": 685, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 696, + "end": 711, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 958, + "end": 967, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 972, + "end": 981, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 983, + "end": 992, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 997, + "end": 1006, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1011, + "end": 1020, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1025, + "end": 1034, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1575, + "end": 1585, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1638, + "end": 1658, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1801, + "end": 1811, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1891, + "end": 1904, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2248, + "end": 2280, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2357, + "end": 2380, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2447, + "end": 2462, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 2904, + "end": 2921, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2944, + "end": 2959, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 3363, + "end": 3372, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3431, + "end": 3441, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3530, + "end": 3539, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 3822, + "end": 3837, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 3927, + "end": 3942, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3967, + "end": 3985, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4055, + "end": 4079, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 4173, + "end": 4187, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4217, + "end": 4231, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4382, + "end": 4396, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4513, + "end": 4530, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 4574, + "end": 4589, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 4662, + "end": 4671, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5227, + "end": 5240, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 5245, + "end": 5250, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 5743, + "end": 5756, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 5830, + "end": 5855, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 5990, + "end": 6002, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 6021, + "end": 6046, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 6318, + "end": 6338, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 6352, + "end": 6367, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 6441, + "end": 6478, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6544, + "end": 6553, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 6647, + "end": 6672, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 6758, + "end": 6767, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 7011, + "end": 7036, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 7376, + "end": 7391, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 7811, + "end": 7820, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 7835, + "end": 7852, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 7914, + "end": 7931, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 8163, + "end": 8183, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 8241, + "end": 8251, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8271, + "end": 8280, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8538, + "end": 8548, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8806, + "end": 8819, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8882, + "end": 8906, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 9357, + "end": 9394, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9532, + "end": 9542, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9615, + "end": 9625, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9691, + "end": 9701, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 10610, + "end": 10620, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 11999, + "end": 12017, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 12680, + "end": 12690, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 13259, + "end": 13269, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 13822, + "end": 13832, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 14641, + "end": 14651, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 14767, + "end": 14774, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 14824, + "end": 14838, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15161, + "end": 15171, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 15245, + "end": 15260, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 15364, + "end": 15371, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 15427, + "end": 15434, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 15489, + "end": 15503, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15581, + "end": 15588, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 15633, + "end": 15640, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 15694, + "end": 15709, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 15735, + "end": 15742, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 15843, + "end": 15858, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 15906, + "end": 15920, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 16000, + "end": 16018, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 16036, + "end": 16056, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 16083, + "end": 16090, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 16160, + "end": 16178, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 16484, + "end": 16499, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 16647, + "end": 16662, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 17461, + "end": 17469, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 18003, + "end": 18072, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18074, + "end": 18197, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18911, + "end": 18921, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 22230, + "end": 22307, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 22549, + "end": 22559, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 23232, + "end": 23256, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 23281, + "end": 23361, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 23661, + "end": 23675, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 23738, + "end": 23753, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 23906, + "end": 23921, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 25140, + "end": 25154, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 27651, + "end": 27666, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 28077, + "end": 28087, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 28229, + "end": 28244, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 28676, + "end": 28691, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 28918, + "end": 28932, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 29153, + "end": 29168, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 29426, + "end": 29441, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 29651, + "end": 29666, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 29898, + "end": 29913, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 31400, + "end": 31410, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 31531, + "end": 31545, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 32062, + "end": 32126, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 32175, + "end": 32188, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 33932, + "end": 33942, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 33985, + "end": 33998, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 34011, + "end": 34028, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "952082": [ + { + "start": 10, + "end": 37, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 50, + "end": 74, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 88, + "end": 111, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 140, + "end": 150, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 163, + "end": 180, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 183, + "end": 194, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 283, + "end": 300, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 309, + "end": 344, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 363, + "end": 392, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 416, + "end": 426, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1622, + "end": 1657, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1710, + "end": 1730, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 1740, + "end": 1764, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1888, + "end": 1923, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 2104, + "end": 2124, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 2246, + "end": 2270, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 2362, + "end": 2382, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 2582, + "end": 2606, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 2688, + "end": 2708, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 2755, + "end": 2790, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 2800, + "end": 2824, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 3135, + "end": 3170, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 3195, + "end": 3204, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3305, + "end": 3329, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 3406, + "end": 3430, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 3508, + "end": 3532, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 3597, + "end": 3617, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 3688, + "end": 3708, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3714, + "end": 3724, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3779, + "end": 3789, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3841, + "end": 3859, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3874, + "end": 3898, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 3951, + "end": 3986, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 4090, + "end": 4114, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 4259, + "end": 4283, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 4504, + "end": 4539, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 4570, + "end": 4590, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 4900, + "end": 4920, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 4973, + "end": 4997, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 5057, + "end": 5081, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 5197, + "end": 5207, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5287, + "end": 5311, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 5490, + "end": 5514, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 5579, + "end": 5599, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 5753, + "end": 5773, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 16768, + "end": 16778, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 16830, + "end": 16934, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17875, + "end": 17924, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20014, + "end": 20115, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20694, + "end": 20768, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21114, + "end": 21187, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21416, + "end": 21529, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21719, + "end": 21798, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 23445, + "end": 23537, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 23938, + "end": 24007, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24396, + "end": 24420, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 24602, + "end": 24622, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 24947, + "end": 24971, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 24981, + "end": 25001, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 25038, + "end": 25062, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 25143, + "end": 25167, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 25950, + "end": 25974, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 25992, + "end": 26002, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 26131, + "end": 26151, + "label": "RESP" + } + ], + "51289111": [ + { + "start": 18, + "end": 40, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 70, + "end": 105, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 183, + "end": 201, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 716, + "end": 726, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 821, + "end": 853, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 893, + "end": 936, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1081, + "end": 1091, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1296, + "end": 1306, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1693, + "end": 1703, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1860, + "end": 1870, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2062, + "end": 2071, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2391, + "end": 2409, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2503, + "end": 2513, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2586, + "end": 2596, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2660, + "end": 2674, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2757, + "end": 2767, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2844, + "end": 2864, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2877, + "end": 2911, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2964, + "end": 2974, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3027, + "end": 3037, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3055, + "end": 3065, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3263, + "end": 3281, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 3526, + "end": 3536, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3599, + "end": 3609, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3745, + "end": 3763, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 3775, + "end": 3799, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4205, + "end": 4215, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5914, + "end": 5933, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 6002, + "end": 6012, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6159, + "end": 6184, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6218, + "end": 6230, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6522, + "end": 6556, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6560, + "end": 6580, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 6792, + "end": 6802, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7046, + "end": 7056, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7871, + "end": 7881, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7911, + "end": 7921, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8669, + "end": 8679, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8764, + "end": 8794, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8864, + "end": 8874, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9005, + "end": 9015, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9563, + "end": 9593, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9599, + "end": 9644, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10614, + "end": 10624, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11075, + "end": 11110, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 11431, + "end": 11452, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12140, + "end": 12165, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12199, + "end": 12218, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12307, + "end": 12324, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 13082, + "end": 13094, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 14548, + "end": 14558, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 14814, + "end": 14826, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15364, + "end": 15374, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 15787, + "end": 15830, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15916, + "end": 15926, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 16125, + "end": 16135, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 18013, + "end": 18034, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18040, + "end": 18071, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 19014, + "end": 19033, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 19445, + "end": 19455, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19731, + "end": 19741, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19748, + "end": 19758, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 19927, + "end": 19940, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 19953, + "end": 19969, + "label": "DATE" + } + ] + }, + "fold_3": { + "1128835": [ + { + "start": 18, + "end": 40, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 114, + "end": 162, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 213, + "end": 229, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 302, + "end": 350, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 355, + "end": 424, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 454, + "end": 470, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 579, + "end": 627, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 679, + "end": 695, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 735, + "end": 747, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 887, + "end": 901, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 917, + "end": 947, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 951, + "end": 975, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1142, + "end": 1162, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1165, + "end": 1170, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1372, + "end": 1407, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1410, + "end": 1414, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1598, + "end": 1615, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1783, + "end": 1796, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1972, + "end": 1977, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 2470, + "end": 2482, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2514, + "end": 2556, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2701, + "end": 2718, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3111, + "end": 3125, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3541, + "end": 3545, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3860, + "end": 3874, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4706, + "end": 4742, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 4750, + "end": 4780, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4901, + "end": 4911, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5178, + "end": 5249, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 5494, + "end": 5510, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5868, + "end": 5872, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 6129, + "end": 6171, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 6389, + "end": 6393, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 6443, + "end": 6460, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6831, + "end": 6835, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 7320, + "end": 7325, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 7471, + "end": 7481, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7492, + "end": 7528, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 7579, + "end": 7584, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 7680, + "end": 7715, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 7730, + "end": 7761, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 8198, + "end": 8203, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 8208, + "end": 8225, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 8749, + "end": 8754, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 9140, + "end": 9154, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9319, + "end": 9341, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9435, + "end": 9449, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11659, + "end": 11676, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 11746, + "end": 11751, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 13521, + "end": 13526, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 13944, + "end": 13958, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 13963, + "end": 13977, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 14900, + "end": 14910, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 20465, + "end": 20503, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20652, + "end": 20690, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 27561, + "end": 27571, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 31133, + "end": 31150, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 34644, + "end": 34661, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 34715, + "end": 34768, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 35403, + "end": 35422, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 35572, + "end": 35582, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 36104, + "end": 36121, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 40531, + "end": 40589, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 40594, + "end": 40604, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 41119, + "end": 41132, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 41187, + "end": 41200, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 43658, + "end": 43750, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 45593, + "end": 45610, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 45661, + "end": 45672, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 46918, + "end": 46931, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 46936, + "end": 46946, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 47198, + "end": 47215, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 47220, + "end": 47231, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 47399, + "end": 47410, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 47755, + "end": 47760, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 48112, + "end": 48123, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 49212, + "end": 49287, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 49364, + "end": 49423, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 49428, + "end": 49515, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 49855, + "end": 49869, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 49982, + "end": 49996, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 50138, + "end": 50152, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 50157, + "end": 50168, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 51431, + "end": 51462, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 51500, + "end": 51527, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 51682, + "end": 51694, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 51767, + "end": 51784, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "450185": [ + { + "start": 12, + "end": 19, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 36, + "end": 79, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 103, + "end": 113, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 121, + "end": 135, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 143, + "end": 157, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 158, + "end": 175, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 1644, + "end": 1668, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1695, + "end": 1712, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1762, + "end": 1772, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1841, + "end": 1853, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1879, + "end": 1889, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2301, + "end": 2315, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3961, + "end": 3972, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5415, + "end": 5494, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 5510, + "end": 5539, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 5594, + "end": 5623, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 5683, + "end": 5692, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5707, + "end": 5717, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5721, + "end": 5748, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 5750, + "end": 5758, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 5760, + "end": 5772, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 5774, + "end": 5786, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 5791, + "end": 5801, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 5821, + "end": 5831, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 5905, + "end": 5918, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 6007, + "end": 6021, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6029, + "end": 6049, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 6057, + "end": 6081, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6131, + "end": 6145, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6190, + "end": 6220, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 7124, + "end": 7141, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8029, + "end": 8053, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8591, + "end": 8608, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8614, + "end": 8626, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8702, + "end": 8712, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8795, + "end": 8807, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9226, + "end": 9236, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9729, + "end": 9749, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9757, + "end": 9767, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 10155, + "end": 10158, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 10206, + "end": 10211, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 10510, + "end": 10513, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 11621, + "end": 11624, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 11675, + "end": 11692, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 11696, + "end": 11774, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 11816, + "end": 11863, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11944, + "end": 11949, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 12922, + "end": 12957, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13759, + "end": 13788, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 16641, + "end": 16655, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 23901, + "end": 23912, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 24261, + "end": 24272, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 25752, + "end": 25799, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 27200, + "end": 27217, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 27221, + "end": 27300, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 27467, + "end": 27483, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 27595, + "end": 27605, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 27697, + "end": 27701, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + } + ], + "13370078": [ + { + "start": 20, + "end": 42, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 146, + "end": 164, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 195, + "end": 215, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 338, + "end": 363, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 370, + "end": 380, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 400, + "end": 410, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 546, + "end": 556, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 740, + "end": 750, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1014, + "end": 1017, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1162, + "end": 1165, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1388, + "end": 1394, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1491, + "end": 1510, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1530, + "end": 1541, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 1582, + "end": 1593, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 1732, + "end": 1736, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 2065, + "end": 2075, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2101, + "end": 2111, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2113, + "end": 2124, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 2151, + "end": 2183, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2195, + "end": 2205, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2216, + "end": 2226, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2277, + "end": 2336, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 2501, + "end": 2511, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2795, + "end": 2805, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2884, + "end": 2913, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2915, + "end": 2946, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 3222, + "end": 3232, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3239, + "end": 3249, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3421, + "end": 3431, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3488, + "end": 3529, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 3604, + "end": 3614, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3620, + "end": 3631, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3684, + "end": 3694, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3763, + "end": 3773, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4023, + "end": 4033, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4058, + "end": 4068, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4124, + "end": 4134, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4192, + "end": 4202, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4265, + "end": 4275, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4321, + "end": 4331, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4369, + "end": 4379, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4480, + "end": 4490, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4700, + "end": 4716, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4738, + "end": 4748, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4829, + "end": 4839, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4846, + "end": 4856, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5037, + "end": 5051, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5110, + "end": 5174, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 5720, + "end": 5724, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6792, + "end": 6796, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6813, + "end": 6817, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7167, + "end": 7171, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7297, + "end": 7338, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7390, + "end": 7400, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7479, + "end": 7489, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7556, + "end": 7566, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7854, + "end": 7868, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7885, + "end": 7895, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8056, + "end": 8066, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8131, + "end": 8141, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8230, + "end": 8240, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8423, + "end": 8433, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8830, + "end": 8834, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8975, + "end": 8985, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9057, + "end": 9071, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9202, + "end": 9212, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9261, + "end": 9265, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9322, + "end": 9332, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9558, + "end": 9568, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9588, + "end": 9598, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9650, + "end": 9660, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9845, + "end": 9855, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9918, + "end": 9928, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 10105, + "end": 10115, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10197, + "end": 10207, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 10229, + "end": 10239, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10381, + "end": 10391, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10744, + "end": 10754, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10801, + "end": 10811, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10926, + "end": 10939, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 11069, + "end": 11074, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 11094, + "end": 11099, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 11175, + "end": 11180, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 11185, + "end": 11195, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11212, + "end": 11223, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 11297, + "end": 11307, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11414, + "end": 11424, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11607, + "end": 11612, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 11664, + "end": 11669, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 11784, + "end": 11789, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 11834, + "end": 11839, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 11947, + "end": 11952, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 12202, + "end": 12207, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 12272, + "end": 12276, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12423, + "end": 12428, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 12474, + "end": 12484, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12501, + "end": 12512, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 12606, + "end": 12616, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12621, + "end": 12631, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12696, + "end": 12706, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12823, + "end": 12833, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12877, + "end": 12887, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 12964, + "end": 12974, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12997, + "end": 13007, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 13099, + "end": 13109, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 13283, + "end": 13293, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 13420, + "end": 13430, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 13543, + "end": 13553, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 13684, + "end": 13694, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 13873, + "end": 13883, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 14233, + "end": 14243, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 14297, + "end": 14307, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 14371, + "end": 14381, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 14388, + "end": 14398, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 14536, + "end": 14546, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 14678, + "end": 14694, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 14730, + "end": 14739, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 14752, + "end": 14768, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "83838189": [ + { + "start": 0, + "end": 23, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 94, + "end": 104, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 131, + "end": 141, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 175, + "end": 192, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 223, + "end": 237, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 238, + "end": 263, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 268, + "end": 294, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 297, + "end": 304, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 313, + "end": 320, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 418, + "end": 427, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 528, + "end": 551, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 595, + "end": 605, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 616, + "end": 634, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 638, + "end": 659, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 679, + "end": 707, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 729, + "end": 740, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 761, + "end": 770, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 787, + "end": 810, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 860, + "end": 874, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 989, + "end": 1017, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1021, + "end": 1036, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1040, + "end": 1061, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1069, + "end": 1079, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1202, + "end": 1221, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1441, + "end": 1462, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1553, + "end": 1571, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1598, + "end": 1615, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1638, + "end": 1662, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1693, + "end": 1745, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2066, + "end": 2081, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2082, + "end": 2105, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2130, + "end": 2154, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2185, + "end": 2237, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2278, + "end": 2284, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2524, + "end": 2542, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2641, + "end": 2659, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2869, + "end": 2881, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3110, + "end": 3130, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 3230, + "end": 3253, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 3393, + "end": 3411, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 3431, + "end": 3441, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3540, + "end": 3551, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 3607, + "end": 3616, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 3858, + "end": 3876, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4047, + "end": 4067, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 4092, + "end": 4104, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4139, + "end": 4154, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 4158, + "end": 4176, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 4178, + "end": 4201, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 4293, + "end": 4305, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4510, + "end": 4522, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4578, + "end": 4584, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4638, + "end": 4644, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4711, + "end": 4723, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4783, + "end": 4795, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4851, + "end": 4869, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4997, + "end": 5003, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5012, + "end": 5030, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5591, + "end": 5614, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 5873, + "end": 5885, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6040, + "end": 6052, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6073, + "end": 6091, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 6095, + "end": 6116, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 6137, + "end": 6149, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6320, + "end": 6326, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6330, + "end": 6347, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 6461, + "end": 6467, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6612, + "end": 6627, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 6672, + "end": 6712, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6731, + "end": 6748, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 6976, + "end": 6986, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6990, + "end": 6998, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 7000, + "end": 7032, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 7426, + "end": 7441, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 7461, + "end": 7501, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7567, + "end": 7577, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7747, + "end": 7757, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7822, + "end": 7832, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7933, + "end": 7937, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 8012, + "end": 8022, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8297, + "end": 8314, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 8478, + "end": 8496, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 8566, + "end": 8589, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 8682, + "end": 8688, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9300, + "end": 9306, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9310, + "end": 9330, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 9474, + "end": 9480, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9608, + "end": 9614, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9721, + "end": 9738, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 9790, + "end": 9796, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9830, + "end": 9852, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 9910, + "end": 9933, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 10056, + "end": 10084, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 10103, + "end": 10121, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 10255, + "end": 10265, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10283, + "end": 10303, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 10360, + "end": 10366, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10659, + "end": 10674, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 10686, + "end": 10716, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 10780, + "end": 10790, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10974, + "end": 10984, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11049, + "end": 11059, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11145, + "end": 11168, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 11219, + "end": 11229, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11355, + "end": 11370, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 11479, + "end": 11502, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 11503, + "end": 11523, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 11531, + "end": 11541, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11622, + "end": 11642, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 11770, + "end": 11785, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 11812, + "end": 11829, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11852, + "end": 11870, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11901, + "end": 11907, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12221, + "end": 12245, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12793, + "end": 12816, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 14281, + "end": 14304, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 14360, + "end": 14375, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 14479, + "end": 14494, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 14520, + "end": 14538, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 14569, + "end": 14575, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 14839, + "end": 14854, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 14893, + "end": 14908, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 14985, + "end": 14991, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 14993, + "end": 15001, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15006, + "end": 15016, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15322, + "end": 15340, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 15599, + "end": 15617, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 15629, + "end": 15644, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 15801, + "end": 15819, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 15836, + "end": 15859, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 15932, + "end": 15956, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16309, + "end": 16324, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 16398, + "end": 16416, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 16466, + "end": 16481, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 16527, + "end": 16545, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 16618, + "end": 16636, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 16929, + "end": 16935, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16988, + "end": 16994, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17037, + "end": 17043, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 17118, + "end": 17141, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 17188, + "end": 17222, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 17257, + "end": 17263, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 17380, + "end": 17400, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 17866, + "end": 17876, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 17888, + "end": 17918, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 17983, + "end": 17993, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 18166, + "end": 18176, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 18241, + "end": 18251, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 18343, + "end": 18363, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 18414, + "end": 18424, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 18566, + "end": 18576, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 18584, + "end": 18594, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 18691, + "end": 18714, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 18733, + "end": 18750, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 18758, + "end": 18768, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 18912, + "end": 18932, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 19323, + "end": 19363, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19367, + "end": 19384, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 19438, + "end": 19478, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19482, + "end": 19499, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 19520, + "end": 19526, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 19599, + "end": 19614, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 19618, + "end": 19639, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 19844, + "end": 19930, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20064, + "end": 20088, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20142, + "end": 20165, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 20216, + "end": 20226, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 20471, + "end": 20481, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 20557, + "end": 20567, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 20573, + "end": 20583, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 20603, + "end": 20613, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 20804, + "end": 20817, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 20831, + "end": 20844, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 20942, + "end": 20960, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 21301, + "end": 21311, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 21391, + "end": 21401, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 21738, + "end": 21761, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 22329, + "end": 22347, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 22576, + "end": 22582, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 22842, + "end": 22848, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 22873, + "end": 22885, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 22935, + "end": 22953, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 23206, + "end": 23229, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 23282, + "end": 23300, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 23325, + "end": 23331, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 24276, + "end": 24282, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 24329, + "end": 24341, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 24431, + "end": 24437, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 24442, + "end": 24465, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 24580, + "end": 24586, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 24710, + "end": 24716, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 24757, + "end": 24763, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 24834, + "end": 24840, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 25071, + "end": 25077, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 25230, + "end": 25236, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 25248, + "end": 25288, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 25358, + "end": 25370, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 25424, + "end": 25430, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 25510, + "end": 25522, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 25570, + "end": 25588, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 25811, + "end": 25821, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 25851, + "end": 25879, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 25883, + "end": 25901, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 25905, + "end": 25926, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 25944, + "end": 25967, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 26035, + "end": 26041, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 26080, + "end": 26120, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 26145, + "end": 26157, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 26207, + "end": 26225, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 26261, + "end": 26282, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 26463, + "end": 26473, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 26515, + "end": 26543, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 26598, + "end": 26615, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 26900, + "end": 26923, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 26924, + "end": 26941, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 26949, + "end": 26963, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 26987, + "end": 27010, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 27011, + "end": 27021, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "1670685": [ + { + "start": 2, + "end": 16, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 21, + "end": 49, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 50, + "end": 64, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 84, + "end": 107, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 128, + "end": 138, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 178, + "end": 187, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 229, + "end": 247, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 474, + "end": 484, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 579, + "end": 589, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "374386": [ + { + "start": 12, + "end": 25, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 51, + "end": 90, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 107, + "end": 117, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 125, + "end": 147, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 155, + "end": 177, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 178, + "end": 192, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 193, + "end": 215, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 226, + "end": 239, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 240, + "end": 256, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 257, + "end": 273, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 279, + "end": 306, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 585, + "end": 612, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1424, + "end": 1447, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1606, + "end": 1629, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1837, + "end": 1888, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 2757, + "end": 2775, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3318, + "end": 3328, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3436, + "end": 3452, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 3477, + "end": 3487, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3535, + "end": 3549, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3599, + "end": 3609, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3810, + "end": 3905, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 6062, + "end": 6076, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6124, + "end": 6141, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6143, + "end": 6153, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 6219, + "end": 6233, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6265, + "end": 6275, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 6407, + "end": 6417, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 6682, + "end": 6698, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6915, + "end": 6931, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6998, + "end": 7014, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8146, + "end": 8166, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 8227, + "end": 8236, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8244, + "end": 8263, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8294, + "end": 8305, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 8307, + "end": 8321, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 8323, + "end": 8336, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 8341, + "end": 8356, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 8378, + "end": 8388, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 8393, + "end": 8406, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 8424, + "end": 8435, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 8453, + "end": 8459, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 8555, + "end": 8566, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 8906, + "end": 8926, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9439, + "end": 9466, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9696, + "end": 9736, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9934, + "end": 9943, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10085, + "end": 10095, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10340, + "end": 10359, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10364, + "end": 10381, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10449, + "end": 10466, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10825, + "end": 10842, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11032, + "end": 11047, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11065, + "end": 11073, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11639, + "end": 11657, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 14386, + "end": 14396, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 14433, + "end": 14443, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 16274, + "end": 16296, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 16311, + "end": 16334, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 16352, + "end": 16374, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 18672, + "end": 18715, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 19403, + "end": 19426, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 19585, + "end": 19608, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 20077, + "end": 20094, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20117, + "end": 20133, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 20842, + "end": 20853, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 22117, + "end": 22127, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 22150, + "end": 22156, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 23052, + "end": 23058, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 23841, + "end": 23847, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 24314, + "end": 24320, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 24468, + "end": 24521, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24526, + "end": 24611, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24616, + "end": 24668, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24674, + "end": 24732, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24737, + "end": 24784, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24793, + "end": 24799, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 24837, + "end": 24864, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 25258, + "end": 25274, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 25299, + "end": 25304, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 25713, + "end": 25718, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 26456, + "end": 26461, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 26911, + "end": 26932, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 27707, + "end": 27795, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 27841, + "end": 27858, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 27862, + "end": 27914, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 28034, + "end": 28043, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 28139, + "end": 28177, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 30086, + "end": 30114, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 30232, + "end": 30248, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 30627, + "end": 30637, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 31059, + "end": 31075, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 31365, + "end": 31375, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 33939, + "end": 33954, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 34011, + "end": 34019, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 34034, + "end": 34043, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 34047, + "end": 34057, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 34733, + "end": 34739, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 35154, + "end": 35181, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 35477, + "end": 35493, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 35756, + "end": 35772, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 35981, + "end": 35987, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 36109, + "end": 36115, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 36845, + "end": 36852, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 36859, + "end": 36890, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 37525, + "end": 37541, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 37599, + "end": 37616, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 37618, + "end": 37628, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 37742, + "end": 37752, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 37831, + "end": 37847, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 37904, + "end": 37914, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 38198, + "end": 38221, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 38443, + "end": 38452, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 38530, + "end": 38537, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 39858, + "end": 39864, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + } + ], + "146535534": [ + { + "start": 99, + "end": 154, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 174, + "end": 199, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 215, + "end": 237, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 271, + "end": 283, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 333, + "end": 343, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 358, + "end": 381, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 398, + "end": 425, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 446, + "end": 456, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 563, + "end": 567, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 693, + "end": 698, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 791, + "end": 795, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 843, + "end": 853, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 977, + "end": 1029, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1187, + "end": 1203, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1260, + "end": 1268, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1293, + "end": 1306, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1313, + "end": 1323, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1448, + "end": 1458, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1481, + "end": 1497, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1529, + "end": 1543, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1578, + "end": 1596, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1635, + "end": 1651, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1674, + "end": 1684, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1842, + "end": 1858, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2004, + "end": 2014, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2069, + "end": 2077, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2083, + "end": 2127, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2129, + "end": 2134, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2162, + "end": 2172, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2253, + "end": 2258, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2350, + "end": 2363, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2460, + "end": 2470, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2474, + "end": 2479, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2534, + "end": 2544, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2584, + "end": 2593, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2601, + "end": 2609, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2697, + "end": 2717, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 2763, + "end": 2768, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2881, + "end": 2890, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3574, + "end": 3584, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3629, + "end": 3634, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3788, + "end": 3798, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3823, + "end": 3831, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3874, + "end": 3882, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4117, + "end": 4125, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4127, + "end": 4131, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4375, + "end": 4409, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 4416, + "end": 4426, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4438, + "end": 4448, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4483, + "end": 4492, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4510, + "end": 4519, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4699, + "end": 4704, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 4770, + "end": 4774, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4805, + "end": 4815, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4918, + "end": 4926, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5629, + "end": 5637, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5804, + "end": 5814, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5870, + "end": 5875, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5977, + "end": 5985, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6119, + "end": 6129, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6411, + "end": 6419, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6498, + "end": 6508, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 6570, + "end": 6580, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6633, + "end": 6641, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6693, + "end": 6701, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6763, + "end": 6771, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6980, + "end": 6988, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7155, + "end": 7163, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7184, + "end": 7199, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7277, + "end": 7285, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7330, + "end": 7348, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 7400, + "end": 7408, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7478, + "end": 7486, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7689, + "end": 7697, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7832, + "end": 7840, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7845, + "end": 7853, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8110, + "end": 8120, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8216, + "end": 8229, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 8316, + "end": 8326, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 8470, + "end": 8480, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 8503, + "end": 8511, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8548, + "end": 8556, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8626, + "end": 8630, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8713, + "end": 8721, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8745, + "end": 8753, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9121, + "end": 9125, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9161, + "end": 9169, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9174, + "end": 9179, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9239, + "end": 9247, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9314, + "end": 9319, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9425, + "end": 9433, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9492, + "end": 9497, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9642, + "end": 9650, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9726, + "end": 9734, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9804, + "end": 9809, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9909, + "end": 9914, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 10141, + "end": 10149, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10404, + "end": 10414, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 10471, + "end": 10479, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10566, + "end": 10574, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10674, + "end": 10682, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10735, + "end": 10743, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10748, + "end": 10756, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10826, + "end": 10836, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 10958, + "end": 11003, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11005, + "end": 11013, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11160, + "end": 11168, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11373, + "end": 11381, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11415, + "end": 11433, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 11440, + "end": 11448, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11570, + "end": 11580, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 11608, + "end": 11616, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11664, + "end": 11672, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11745, + "end": 11753, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12011, + "end": 12019, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12024, + "end": 12032, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12054, + "end": 12062, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13328, + "end": 13336, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 14124, + "end": 14132, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 14454, + "end": 14462, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 14507, + "end": 14523, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 14792, + "end": 14808, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 15109, + "end": 15127, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 15471, + "end": 15489, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 15707, + "end": 15725, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 15787, + "end": 15797, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15931, + "end": 15941, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15965, + "end": 15973, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16001, + "end": 16019, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 16256, + "end": 16274, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 16481, + "end": 16489, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16854, + "end": 16872, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 17099, + "end": 17115, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 17215, + "end": 17231, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 17235, + "end": 17253, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 17352, + "end": 17368, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 17372, + "end": 17390, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 17499, + "end": 17507, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18763, + "end": 18797, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 18819, + "end": 18827, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 19083, + "end": 19117, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 19448, + "end": 19482, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 19568, + "end": 19576, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 19674, + "end": 19690, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 19768, + "end": 19776, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20077, + "end": 20085, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20286, + "end": 20294, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20450, + "end": 20458, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20463, + "end": 20471, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20685, + "end": 20693, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20834, + "end": 20838, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20915, + "end": 20923, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 21302, + "end": 21310, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 21478, + "end": 21486, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 21825, + "end": 21833, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 21907, + "end": 21931, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 21950, + "end": 21960, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21977, + "end": 21985, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 22100, + "end": 22116, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 22352, + "end": 22368, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 22395, + "end": 22405, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 22596, + "end": 22601, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 22621, + "end": 22629, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 22678, + "end": 22688, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 22734, + "end": 22744, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 22771, + "end": 22781, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 23002, + "end": 23012, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 23051, + "end": 23055, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 23184, + "end": 23202, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 23220, + "end": 23225, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 23490, + "end": 23533, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 23733, + "end": 23738, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 23779, + "end": 23797, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 23933, + "end": 23941, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 24179, + "end": 24184, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 24319, + "end": 24347, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 24469, + "end": 24512, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 24658, + "end": 24686, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 25585, + "end": 25603, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 25807, + "end": 25812, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 25933, + "end": 25943, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 26083, + "end": 26099, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 26304, + "end": 26314, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 26554, + "end": 26564, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 26772, + "end": 26780, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 26836, + "end": 26844, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 27150, + "end": 27166, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 27269, + "end": 27317, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 27344, + "end": 27389, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 27646, + "end": 27656, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 27930, + "end": 27940, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 28153, + "end": 28161, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 28166, + "end": 28174, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 28230, + "end": 28238, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 28265, + "end": 28283, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 28430, + "end": 28438, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 28539, + "end": 28547, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 28842, + "end": 28850, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 28885, + "end": 28895, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 28990, + "end": 28995, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 29064, + "end": 29069, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 29156, + "end": 29164, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 29215, + "end": 29225, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 29302, + "end": 29310, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 29548, + "end": 29553, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 29591, + "end": 29599, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 29633, + "end": 29638, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 29680, + "end": 29688, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 29905, + "end": 29923, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 29946, + "end": 29954, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 30250, + "end": 30268, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 30291, + "end": 30299, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 30387, + "end": 30405, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 30412, + "end": 30420, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 30472, + "end": 30480, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 30755, + "end": 30763, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 30897, + "end": 30905, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 31015, + "end": 31025, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 31089, + "end": 31097, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 31161, + "end": 31169, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 31194, + "end": 31204, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 31277, + "end": 31285, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 31377, + "end": 31395, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 31414, + "end": 31422, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 31427, + "end": 31431, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 31632, + "end": 31636, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 31688, + "end": 31698, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 31767, + "end": 31785, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 31804, + "end": 31812, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 31982, + "end": 31990, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 32021, + "end": 32029, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 32160, + "end": 32194, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 32706, + "end": 32711, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 32745, + "end": 32755, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 32777, + "end": 32785, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 32820, + "end": 32838, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 32898, + "end": 32908, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 32973, + "end": 32991, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 32998, + "end": 33006, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 33158, + "end": 33168, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 33347, + "end": 33357, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 33368, + "end": 33376, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 33425, + "end": 33433, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 33458, + "end": 33466, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 33699, + "end": 33717, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 33945, + "end": 33961, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 34023, + "end": 34031, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 34059, + "end": 34067, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 34170, + "end": 34180, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 34374, + "end": 34382, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 34590, + "end": 34598, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 34927, + "end": 34935, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 35049, + "end": 35057, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 35286, + "end": 35294, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 35299, + "end": 35307, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 35492, + "end": 35512, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 35625, + "end": 35635, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 35839, + "end": 35849, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 36004, + "end": 36014, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 36092, + "end": 36097, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 36611, + "end": 36621, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 37261, + "end": 37279, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 37312, + "end": 37322, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 37408, + "end": 37418, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 37452, + "end": 37456, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 37563, + "end": 37571, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 37724, + "end": 37729, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 37979, + "end": 37989, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 38089, + "end": 38094, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 38297, + "end": 38307, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 38358, + "end": 38362, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 38401, + "end": 38416, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 38425, + "end": 38440, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 38961, + "end": 38971, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 39154, + "end": 39164, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 39339, + "end": 39351, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 39368, + "end": 39383, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 39396, + "end": 39413, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "121357872": [ + { + "start": 20, + "end": 42, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 167, + "end": 184, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 205, + "end": 228, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 267, + "end": 280, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 388, + "end": 416, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 437, + "end": 466, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 473, + "end": 483, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 603, + "end": 613, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 651, + "end": 671, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 678, + "end": 688, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 863, + "end": 873, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1198, + "end": 1223, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1480, + "end": 1490, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1700, + "end": 1710, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1886, + "end": 1899, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1927, + "end": 1936, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1980, + "end": 1996, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 2200, + "end": 2210, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2258, + "end": 2268, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2454, + "end": 2464, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2507, + "end": 2524, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 2558, + "end": 2571, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 2883, + "end": 2893, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2931, + "end": 2941, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3065, + "end": 3075, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3243, + "end": 3253, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3287, + "end": 3297, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3344, + "end": 3366, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3796, + "end": 3837, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3877, + "end": 3887, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4113, + "end": 4123, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4164, + "end": 4174, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4299, + "end": 4328, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 4363, + "end": 4391, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4421, + "end": 4431, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4456, + "end": 4466, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4765, + "end": 4773, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4817, + "end": 4827, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4955, + "end": 4963, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5133, + "end": 5143, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5532, + "end": 5544, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 5597, + "end": 5609, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 5661, + "end": 5673, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 5770, + "end": 5780, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5820, + "end": 5847, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5854, + "end": 5861, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 5923, + "end": 5930, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 6167, + "end": 6174, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 6347, + "end": 6354, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 6545, + "end": 6557, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 6806, + "end": 6811, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 6966, + "end": 6971, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 7522, + "end": 7544, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7622, + "end": 7632, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7673, + "end": 7683, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8949, + "end": 8971, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9121, + "end": 9143, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 14176, + "end": 14198, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 14243, + "end": 14296, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14317, + "end": 14330, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 17077, + "end": 17136, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17224, + "end": 17246, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18733, + "end": 18743, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 18947, + "end": 18960, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 18965, + "end": 18977, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 19365, + "end": 19375, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19536, + "end": 19546, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19618, + "end": 19628, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 19686, + "end": 19699, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 19704, + "end": 19716, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 19883, + "end": 19893, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 20573, + "end": 20583, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 20802, + "end": 20815, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 20845, + "end": 20861, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 20891, + "end": 20900, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 20914, + "end": 20932, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "1714434": [ + { + "start": 10, + "end": 53, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 108, + "end": 142, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 168, + "end": 178, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 186, + "end": 194, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 196, + "end": 209, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 220, + "end": 233, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 260, + "end": 283, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 291, + "end": 314, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 326, + "end": 344, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1494, + "end": 1508, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 1768, + "end": 1797, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 1804, + "end": 1826, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 1920, + "end": 1934, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 4176, + "end": 4184, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4443, + "end": 4453, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4796, + "end": 4805, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4947, + "end": 4953, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 5334, + "end": 5344, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5489, + "end": 5497, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5782, + "end": 5800, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 6217, + "end": 6220, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6555, + "end": 6568, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7488, + "end": 7496, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7498, + "end": 7506, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7511, + "end": 7520, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8630, + "end": 8647, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 9497, + "end": 9511, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 11853, + "end": 11862, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 13508, + "end": 13516, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15389, + "end": 15402, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15788, + "end": 15791, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17110, + "end": 17119, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 17335, + "end": 17350, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 17377, + "end": 17383, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 17614, + "end": 17629, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 18153, + "end": 18162, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 18759, + "end": 18777, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 19139, + "end": 19148, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 20268, + "end": 20277, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 20308, + "end": 20323, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 22251, + "end": 22260, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 22407, + "end": 22416, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 22809, + "end": 22817, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 23132, + "end": 23141, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 23447, + "end": 23465, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 24308, + "end": 24327, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 25055, + "end": 25065, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 25325, + "end": 25335, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 25731, + "end": 25741, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 26561, + "end": 26575, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 26581, + "end": 26591, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 27134, + "end": 27144, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 27150, + "end": 27160, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 27206, + "end": 27219, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 27280, + "end": 27290, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 27481, + "end": 27493, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 27529, + "end": 27539, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 27606, + "end": 27619, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 27945, + "end": 27955, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 27960, + "end": 27970, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 28423, + "end": 28435, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 28634, + "end": 28648, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 28908, + "end": 28917, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 29136, + "end": 29145, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 29425, + "end": 29434, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 29575, + "end": 29585, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 29750, + "end": 29759, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 30353, + "end": 30388, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 30425, + "end": 30435, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 30967, + "end": 30977, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 30982, + "end": 30992, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 31455, + "end": 31465, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 32566, + "end": 32586, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 33156, + "end": 33169, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 33632, + "end": 33645, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 34139, + "end": 34149, + "label": "COURT" + } + ], + "48115323": [ + { + "start": 104, + "end": 116, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 117, + "end": 136, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 137, + "end": 158, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 159, + "end": 178, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 186, + "end": 223, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 262, + "end": 277, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 288, + "end": 307, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 318, + "end": 328, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 361, + "end": 381, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 396, + "end": 412, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 443, + "end": 453, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 469, + "end": 479, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 480, + "end": 492, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 534, + "end": 552, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 661, + "end": 676, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 710, + "end": 728, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 803, + "end": 821, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 915, + "end": 933, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 956, + "end": 982, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1050, + "end": 1069, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1499, + "end": 1514, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1751, + "end": 1766, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1872, + "end": 1885, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2040, + "end": 2054, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2251, + "end": 2269, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2420, + "end": 2438, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 3076, + "end": 3092, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3383, + "end": 3401, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4140, + "end": 4158, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 4235, + "end": 4253, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 5347, + "end": 5365, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 5621, + "end": 5639, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 5755, + "end": 5772, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5910, + "end": 5923, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5941, + "end": 6002, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 6527, + "end": 6547, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6598, + "end": 6618, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 6636, + "end": 6703, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7177, + "end": 7190, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7208, + "end": 7237, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8759, + "end": 8772, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8790, + "end": 8828, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9480, + "end": 9563, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9596, + "end": 9628, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9634, + "end": 9666, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9709, + "end": 9792, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9961, + "end": 9993, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10135, + "end": 10153, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 10228, + "end": 10246, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 10439, + "end": 10527, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10919, + "end": 10937, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 10986, + "end": 11018, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11122, + "end": 11140, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 11484, + "end": 11497, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 11515, + "end": 11550, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 11554, + "end": 11567, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12448, + "end": 12461, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 12479, + "end": 12527, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12923, + "end": 13021, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 13274, + "end": 13287, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 13300, + "end": 13360, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 13740, + "end": 13758, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 13912, + "end": 13930, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 14049, + "end": 14067, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 14142, + "end": 14160, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 14989, + "end": 15007, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 15294, + "end": 15304, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 15745, + "end": 15774, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15836, + "end": 15846, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 16390, + "end": 16403, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 16421, + "end": 16452, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17187, + "end": 17200, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 17218, + "end": 17253, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18012, + "end": 18030, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 18462, + "end": 18480, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 20310, + "end": 20328, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 20437, + "end": 20455, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 21516, + "end": 21525, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 21778, + "end": 21796, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 22803, + "end": 22821, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 23293, + "end": 23306, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 23718, + "end": 23738, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 23952, + "end": 23970, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 25121, + "end": 25140, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 25145, + "end": 25166, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 25327, + "end": 25339, + "label": "JUDGE" + } + ], + "135785387": [ + { + "start": 139, + "end": 157, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 288, + "end": 298, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 313, + "end": 323, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 353, + "end": 381, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 396, + "end": 406, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 669, + "end": 679, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 803, + "end": 806, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 976, + "end": 986, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1498, + "end": 1508, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1866, + "end": 1876, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1931, + "end": 1941, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2198, + "end": 2201, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2706, + "end": 2714, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3350, + "end": 3360, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3402, + "end": 3412, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3679, + "end": 3682, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3778, + "end": 3788, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3873, + "end": 3883, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4064, + "end": 4067, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4259, + "end": 4269, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4500, + "end": 4510, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4582, + "end": 4590, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5127, + "end": 5137, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5317, + "end": 5327, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5470, + "end": 5480, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5581, + "end": 5591, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5985, + "end": 5995, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6429, + "end": 6439, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7513, + "end": 7523, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7748, + "end": 7758, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8225, + "end": 8235, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8547, + "end": 8557, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8864, + "end": 8874, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8936, + "end": 8941, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8957, + "end": 8998, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9238, + "end": 9248, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 10099, + "end": 10141, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10143, + "end": 10192, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10194, + "end": 10244, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10246, + "end": 10294, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10296, + "end": 10339, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10341, + "end": 10390, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10392, + "end": 10441, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10443, + "end": 10478, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10480, + "end": 10536, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10541, + "end": 10583, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10592, + "end": 10635, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10693, + "end": 10703, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 11294, + "end": 11330, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 11332, + "end": 11379, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 11381, + "end": 11433, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 11435, + "end": 11482, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 11484, + "end": 11530, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 11532, + "end": 11576, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 11581, + "end": 11628, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 11637, + "end": 11686, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 11902, + "end": 11938, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13352, + "end": 13396, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 13915, + "end": 13960, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14240, + "end": 14279, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14421, + "end": 14431, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 14491, + "end": 14501, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 14604, + "end": 14614, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 14712, + "end": 14722, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 14823, + "end": 14833, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 15030, + "end": 15040, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 15151, + "end": 15161, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 15252, + "end": 15287, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16447, + "end": 16499, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16501, + "end": 16594, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16596, + "end": 16651, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16653, + "end": 16696, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17340, + "end": 17397, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17505, + "end": 17515, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 17822, + "end": 17832, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 17972, + "end": 17982, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 18138, + "end": 18148, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 18201, + "end": 18211, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 18294, + "end": 18304, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 18416, + "end": 18426, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 18772, + "end": 18818, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18824, + "end": 18834, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 18995, + "end": 19005, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19236, + "end": 19246, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19538, + "end": 19548, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19605, + "end": 19615, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19658, + "end": 19668, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 19741, + "end": 19751, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19817, + "end": 19827, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19896, + "end": 19953, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20229, + "end": 20239, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 21588, + "end": 21648, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21786, + "end": 21796, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 21965, + "end": 21975, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 22336, + "end": 22346, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 22767, + "end": 22777, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 22865, + "end": 22903, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 23101, + "end": 23111, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 23578, + "end": 23588, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 24713, + "end": 24751, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24753, + "end": 24798, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24898, + "end": 24908, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 25004, + "end": 25052, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 25296, + "end": 25306, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 25565, + "end": 25575, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 25581, + "end": 25591, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 25803, + "end": 25813, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 26080, + "end": 26090, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 26519, + "end": 26529, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 26662, + "end": 26672, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 26933, + "end": 26943, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 27479, + "end": 27489, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 27612, + "end": 27675, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 27677, + "end": 27732, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 27738, + "end": 27786, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 29160, + "end": 29170, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 29214, + "end": 29224, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 29412, + "end": 29422, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 30368, + "end": 30378, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 30466, + "end": 30476, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 30531, + "end": 30541, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 30814, + "end": 30817, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 31189, + "end": 31192, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 31495, + "end": 31498, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 31572, + "end": 31620, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 32191, + "end": 32203, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 32504, + "end": 32516, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 34388, + "end": 34458, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 34994, + "end": 35006, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 36683, + "end": 36686, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 37160, + "end": 37213, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 37356, + "end": 37409, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 38198, + "end": 38201, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 38225, + "end": 38228, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 38250, + "end": 38303, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 39598, + "end": 39680, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 41113, + "end": 41125, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 41346, + "end": 41435, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 41905, + "end": 41908, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 42098, + "end": 42108, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 42177, + "end": 42180, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 42362, + "end": 42372, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 42520, + "end": 42533, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 42536, + "end": 42545, + "label": "JUDGE" + } + ], + "155222376": [ + { + "start": 22, + "end": 44, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 106, + "end": 139, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 163, + "end": 181, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 221, + "end": 228, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 280, + "end": 301, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 464, + "end": 469, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 517, + "end": 536, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 647, + "end": 666, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 734, + "end": 758, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 780, + "end": 790, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 900, + "end": 922, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 935, + "end": 938, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 1427, + "end": 1430, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 1463, + "end": 1468, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1864, + "end": 1907, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2067, + "end": 2081, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2093, + "end": 2136, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2176, + "end": 2193, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2206, + "end": 2223, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2300, + "end": 2319, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2387, + "end": 2430, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3154, + "end": 3171, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3201, + "end": 3215, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3957, + "end": 3983, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3989, + "end": 4015, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 4643, + "end": 4663, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5112, + "end": 5116, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 6534, + "end": 6548, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7556, + "end": 7560, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 7777, + "end": 7781, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 8805, + "end": 8809, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9017, + "end": 9035, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9176, + "end": 9194, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9431, + "end": 9446, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9790, + "end": 9795, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 10087, + "end": 10102, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10265, + "end": 10283, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 10855, + "end": 10875, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11109, + "end": 11129, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11650, + "end": 11662, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 12145, + "end": 12153, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 12400, + "end": 12408, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 14326, + "end": 14346, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 14633, + "end": 14649, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 14716, + "end": 14734, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 14781, + "end": 14801, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15201, + "end": 15221, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15335, + "end": 15353, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 15986, + "end": 16006, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 16253, + "end": 16261, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 16556, + "end": 16564, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 16695, + "end": 16703, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 16862, + "end": 16870, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 17122, + "end": 17130, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 17197, + "end": 17205, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 17253, + "end": 17261, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 17290, + "end": 17314, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 17347, + "end": 17355, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 17439, + "end": 17447, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 17533, + "end": 17541, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 17582, + "end": 17590, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 17982, + "end": 17990, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 18020, + "end": 18028, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 18081, + "end": 18089, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 18114, + "end": 18122, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 18128, + "end": 18152, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 18261, + "end": 18279, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 18286, + "end": 18305, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 18531, + "end": 18551, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 18862, + "end": 18882, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 19715, + "end": 19734, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 19965, + "end": 19985, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21525, + "end": 21545, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21916, + "end": 21936, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 22239, + "end": 22256, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 22314, + "end": 22333, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 22442, + "end": 22460, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 22576, + "end": 22596, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 23702, + "end": 23722, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 24400, + "end": 24420, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 24980, + "end": 24997, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 25117, + "end": 25134, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 25352, + "end": 25372, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 25964, + "end": 25993, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 27030, + "end": 27047, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 27359, + "end": 27376, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 27683, + "end": 27700, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 27977, + "end": 27989, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 28001, + "end": 28018, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "33220115": [ + { + "start": 20, + "end": 42, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 72, + "end": 101, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 106, + "end": 137, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 174, + "end": 194, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 227, + "end": 237, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 326, + "end": 329, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 350, + "end": 388, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 403, + "end": 442, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 513, + "end": 545, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1019, + "end": 1033, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1413, + "end": 1422, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1818, + "end": 1827, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1897, + "end": 1906, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1976, + "end": 2057, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2918, + "end": 2927, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3671, + "end": 3680, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3889, + "end": 3899, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4298, + "end": 4308, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4354, + "end": 4364, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4375, + "end": 4413, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 4639, + "end": 4649, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4869, + "end": 4878, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5220, + "end": 5252, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5290, + "end": 5322, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5400, + "end": 5409, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5697, + "end": 5707, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5897, + "end": 5913, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 6037, + "end": 6047, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6275, + "end": 6285, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7014, + "end": 7024, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7197, + "end": 7207, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7944, + "end": 8023, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8025, + "end": 8035, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8197, + "end": 8305, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8714, + "end": 8761, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8912, + "end": 9020, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9093, + "end": 9129, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10888, + "end": 10913, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 10920, + "end": 10929, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11462, + "end": 11472, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 11991, + "end": 12001, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 12239, + "end": 12248, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 13104, + "end": 13114, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 13224, + "end": 13247, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 13263, + "end": 13327, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 13331, + "end": 13360, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 13373, + "end": 13383, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 13599, + "end": 13619, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 13940, + "end": 13950, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 14120, + "end": 14130, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 14602, + "end": 14612, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 14960, + "end": 14963, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15168, + "end": 15175, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15885, + "end": 15893, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16917, + "end": 16961, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17260, + "end": 17349, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17563, + "end": 17663, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18132, + "end": 18225, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18566, + "end": 18598, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 19464, + "end": 19480, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 20222, + "end": 20258, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20293, + "end": 20326, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20729, + "end": 20732, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21744, + "end": 21754, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 21774, + "end": 21784, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 22031, + "end": 22041, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 22521, + "end": 22531, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 26025, + "end": 26045, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 26061, + "end": 26073, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26191, + "end": 26201, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 26363, + "end": 26372, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 26524, + "end": 26534, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 27213, + "end": 27223, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 27242, + "end": 27255, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 27268, + "end": 27284, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "129202572": [ + { + "start": 0, + "end": 12, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 85, + "end": 113, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 130, + "end": 152, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 157, + "end": 170, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 285, + "end": 309, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 772, + "end": 789, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 947, + "end": 957, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 958, + "end": 966, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 979, + "end": 991, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1079, + "end": 1095, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1121, + "end": 1155, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1398, + "end": 1408, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1486, + "end": 1499, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1913, + "end": 1925, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1930, + "end": 1944, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2174, + "end": 2192, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2431, + "end": 2478, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2525, + "end": 2530, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2532, + "end": 2544, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2565, + "end": 2582, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2686, + "end": 2696, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3331, + "end": 3343, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3409, + "end": 3414, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3451, + "end": 3463, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3561, + "end": 3574, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3819, + "end": 3836, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4046, + "end": 4072, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4179, + "end": 4205, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4235, + "end": 4247, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4272, + "end": 4284, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 4305, + "end": 4339, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4426, + "end": 4443, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4448, + "end": 4460, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4537, + "end": 4547, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4570, + "end": 4586, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4821, + "end": 4831, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5295, + "end": 5310, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5317, + "end": 5328, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 5601, + "end": 5606, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5688, + "end": 5705, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5710, + "end": 5722, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 5759, + "end": 5769, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5821, + "end": 5833, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6161, + "end": 6166, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 6435, + "end": 6440, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 6651, + "end": 6656, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 6808, + "end": 6813, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 6843, + "end": 6855, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 7025, + "end": 7051, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7511, + "end": 7571, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7623, + "end": 7636, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 7808, + "end": 7834, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8173, + "end": 8185, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 8404, + "end": 8430, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8643, + "end": 8659, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9652, + "end": 9664, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 11478, + "end": 11490, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 13290, + "end": 13302, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 14647, + "end": 14652, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 15054, + "end": 15066, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 16271, + "end": 16293, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17056, + "end": 17068, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 18473, + "end": 18490, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 18622, + "end": 18634, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 20451, + "end": 20463, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 20860, + "end": 20876, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 22429, + "end": 22441, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 24115, + "end": 24127, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 26146, + "end": 26162, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 27714, + "end": 27724, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 27892, + "end": 27904, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 27930, + "end": 27943, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 29657, + "end": 29669, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 31498, + "end": 31510, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 31879, + "end": 31884, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 32058, + "end": 32063, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 32351, + "end": 32356, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 32755, + "end": 32776, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 33107, + "end": 33119, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 33239, + "end": 33255, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 33821, + "end": 33833, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 34056, + "end": 34077, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 34811, + "end": 34849, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 34851, + "end": 34912, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 34914, + "end": 34979, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 34981, + "end": 34993, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 35360, + "end": 35365, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 35852, + "end": 35869, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 35876, + "end": 35892, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 36338, + "end": 36350, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 36448, + "end": 36460, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 36557, + "end": 36581, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 36621, + "end": 36635, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 36648, + "end": 36666, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "184940": [ + { + "start": 115, + "end": 163, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 165, + "end": 204, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 227, + "end": 243, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 268, + "end": 278, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 695, + "end": 704, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 777, + "end": 786, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 879, + "end": 888, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2029, + "end": 2038, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2161, + "end": 2174, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 2303, + "end": 2338, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3918, + "end": 3931, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 4977, + "end": 4990, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 5733, + "end": 5742, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5860, + "end": 5869, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6462, + "end": 6479, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 6744, + "end": 6754, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6760, + "end": 6774, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 7297, + "end": 7307, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7328, + "end": 7350, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 7403, + "end": 7412, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7493, + "end": 7505, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 8374, + "end": 8384, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8606, + "end": 8625, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8789, + "end": 8808, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 8929, + "end": 8948, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15097, + "end": 15112, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 16778, + "end": 16788, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 17150, + "end": 17159, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 17304, + "end": 17314, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 18388, + "end": 18398, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 20711, + "end": 20720, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 20864, + "end": 20874, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 20930, + "end": 20936, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 21771, + "end": 21781, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 22112, + "end": 22122, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 22194, + "end": 22205, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 22562, + "end": 22582, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 23122, + "end": 23181, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26034, + "end": 26047, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 26644, + "end": 26663, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 26710, + "end": 26724, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 26782, + "end": 26792, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 27539, + "end": 27549, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 29018, + "end": 29039, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 29082, + "end": 29100, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 29113, + "end": 29129, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "97694707": [ + { + "start": 75, + "end": 105, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 122, + "end": 149, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 151, + "end": 166, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 196, + "end": 227, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 251, + "end": 279, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 319, + "end": 330, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 396, + "end": 406, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 429, + "end": 439, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 480, + "end": 490, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 602, + "end": 612, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 987, + "end": 1023, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1056, + "end": 1059, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1076, + "end": 1086, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1099, + "end": 1134, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1136, + "end": 1140, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1310, + "end": 1313, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1399, + "end": 1409, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1599, + "end": 1609, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1797, + "end": 1807, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1914, + "end": 1943, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2065, + "end": 2075, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2170, + "end": 2180, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2181, + "end": 2216, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2740, + "end": 2753, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3471, + "end": 3488, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 3566, + "end": 3576, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3881, + "end": 3884, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4308, + "end": 4318, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4468, + "end": 4471, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4552, + "end": 4562, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4600, + "end": 4610, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4785, + "end": 4795, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4849, + "end": 4868, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 6195, + "end": 6205, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6239, + "end": 6249, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6410, + "end": 6420, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7013, + "end": 7046, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 7085, + "end": 7105, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 7113, + "end": 7123, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7162, + "end": 7180, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 7280, + "end": 7283, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8187, + "end": 8197, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8325, + "end": 8335, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8447, + "end": 8466, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 8749, + "end": 8759, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9028, + "end": 9032, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 9258, + "end": 9262, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 10522, + "end": 10556, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 10818, + "end": 10837, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 11096, + "end": 11107, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 11163, + "end": 11176, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 11211, + "end": 11224, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 11652, + "end": 11662, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 11750, + "end": 11760, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 11927, + "end": 11930, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11983, + "end": 12032, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12036, + "end": 12066, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 12442, + "end": 12445, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12619, + "end": 12629, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 12916, + "end": 12929, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 13760, + "end": 13770, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 13911, + "end": 13921, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15014, + "end": 15024, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15028, + "end": 15038, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15161, + "end": 15171, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15399, + "end": 15409, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15703, + "end": 15713, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 16028, + "end": 16038, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 16053, + "end": 16072, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 16429, + "end": 16432, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16744, + "end": 16754, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 16855, + "end": 16865, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 17338, + "end": 17348, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 17352, + "end": 17362, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 17529, + "end": 17539, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 17584, + "end": 17587, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18925, + "end": 18935, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 19035, + "end": 19045, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 19082, + "end": 19092, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 19218, + "end": 19228, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 19480, + "end": 19490, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19681, + "end": 19691, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 19752, + "end": 19765, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 20052, + "end": 20055, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 21401, + "end": 21513, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 22712, + "end": 22722, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 22986, + "end": 22989, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 23539, + "end": 23549, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 24012, + "end": 24015, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 24199, + "end": 24202, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 24294, + "end": 24304, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 25121, + "end": 25124, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 25215, + "end": 25218, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 25753, + "end": 25764, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 25792, + "end": 25803, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 25816, + "end": 25830, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "48386631": [ + { + "start": 63, + "end": 73, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 96, + "end": 106, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 129, + "end": 155, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 174, + "end": 196, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 219, + "end": 233, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 273, + "end": 288, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 289, + "end": 303, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 339, + "end": 353, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 362, + "end": 385, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 401, + "end": 426, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 443, + "end": 466, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 484, + "end": 499, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 544, + "end": 558, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 786, + "end": 795, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1054, + "end": 1085, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1108, + "end": 1114, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1220, + "end": 1251, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1259, + "end": 1265, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1301, + "end": 1335, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1422, + "end": 1443, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1475, + "end": 1531, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1579, + "end": 1589, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1796, + "end": 1806, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1817, + "end": 1841, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1936, + "end": 1946, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1950, + "end": 1960, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2026, + "end": 2044, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2075, + "end": 2101, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2198, + "end": 2222, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2243, + "end": 2260, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2331, + "end": 2341, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2598, + "end": 2622, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2754, + "end": 2772, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2886, + "end": 2896, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3004, + "end": 3022, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3119, + "end": 3140, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3596, + "end": 3606, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3659, + "end": 3683, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3741, + "end": 3772, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4027, + "end": 4037, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4112, + "end": 4124, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4207, + "end": 4217, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4335, + "end": 4350, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4374, + "end": 4392, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4700, + "end": 4718, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4794, + "end": 4804, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4853, + "end": 4867, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 5091, + "end": 5105, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 5205, + "end": 5223, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5422, + "end": 5432, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5472, + "end": 5482, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5504, + "end": 5514, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5518, + "end": 5528, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5816, + "end": 5826, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5851, + "end": 5875, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6117, + "end": 6127, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6131, + "end": 6141, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6256, + "end": 6282, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6337, + "end": 6347, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6758, + "end": 6782, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6964, + "end": 6988, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7009, + "end": 7033, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7282, + "end": 7306, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7675, + "end": 7699, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7732, + "end": 7792, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8141, + "end": 8151, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8230, + "end": 8254, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8316, + "end": 8347, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8632, + "end": 8642, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8803, + "end": 8815, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9196, + "end": 9238, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9346, + "end": 9368, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 9447, + "end": 9460, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9535, + "end": 9545, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9585, + "end": 9593, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9628, + "end": 9637, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9951, + "end": 9975, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10034, + "end": 10073, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10103, + "end": 10113, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10134, + "end": 10144, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10178, + "end": 10202, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10295, + "end": 10307, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10332, + "end": 10342, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10442, + "end": 10452, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10490, + "end": 10514, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12428, + "end": 12452, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12482, + "end": 12490, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12491, + "end": 12500, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12654, + "end": 12662, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12663, + "end": 12672, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12997, + "end": 13021, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13112, + "end": 13136, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13253, + "end": 13277, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13425, + "end": 13449, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13565, + "end": 13589, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13751, + "end": 13769, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13854, + "end": 13878, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 14470, + "end": 14494, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 14772, + "end": 14796, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15448, + "end": 15456, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15478, + "end": 15502, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15597, + "end": 15609, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15615, + "end": 15639, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15782, + "end": 15794, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15916, + "end": 15947, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16124, + "end": 16132, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16334, + "end": 16347, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 16363, + "end": 16459, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16560, + "end": 16584, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18497, + "end": 18528, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 19664, + "end": 19688, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20189, + "end": 20199, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "91090158": [ + { + "start": 242, + "end": 251, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 473, + "end": 486, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 632, + "end": 642, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 776, + "end": 785, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1229, + "end": 1242, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 1271, + "end": 1277, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 1663, + "end": 1672, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1895, + "end": 1898, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1965, + "end": 1979, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 2616, + "end": 2637, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2679, + "end": 2693, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2697, + "end": 2723, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2854, + "end": 2886, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2920, + "end": 2927, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3433, + "end": 3439, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 3473, + "end": 3479, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 3488, + "end": 3494, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 3503, + "end": 3517, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 3529, + "end": 3536, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 3643, + "end": 3656, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 3696, + "end": 3712, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 3748, + "end": 3762, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 3800, + "end": 3812, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 3983, + "end": 3997, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4088, + "end": 4091, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4124, + "end": 4133, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4157, + "end": 4171, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5383, + "end": 5393, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5401, + "end": 5429, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 5537, + "end": 5547, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5745, + "end": 5755, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5836, + "end": 5845, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6101, + "end": 6112, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6528, + "end": 6539, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7099, + "end": 7105, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 7266, + "end": 7277, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7685, + "end": 7696, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7745, + "end": 7755, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8520, + "end": 8530, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8562, + "end": 8587, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8621, + "end": 8633, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9921, + "end": 9930, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10271, + "end": 10278, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 11594, + "end": 11606, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11710, + "end": 11766, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 11890, + "end": 11940, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12113, + "end": 12158, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12726, + "end": 12738, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13207, + "end": 13254, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 13780, + "end": 13830, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14017, + "end": 14035, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 14726, + "end": 14772, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15146, + "end": 15157, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 17201, + "end": 17211, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 18051, + "end": 18058, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18190, + "end": 18235, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18701, + "end": 18719, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 18739, + "end": 18753, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 18766, + "end": 18783, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "189745935": [ + { + "start": 104, + "end": 122, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 145, + "end": 171, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 203, + "end": 215, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 307, + "end": 321, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 694, + "end": 708, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 784, + "end": 794, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1112, + "end": 1126, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1165, + "end": 1179, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1211, + "end": 1226, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1299, + "end": 1313, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1681, + "end": 1701, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1963, + "end": 1977, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2004, + "end": 2022, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2028, + "end": 2041, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 2145, + "end": 2185, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2192, + "end": 2205, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2211, + "end": 2229, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2267, + "end": 2281, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 4274, + "end": 4288, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4345, + "end": 4387, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 5179, + "end": 5197, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5261, + "end": 5275, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5403, + "end": 5417, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 5742, + "end": 5760, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5838, + "end": 5851, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 5902, + "end": 5912, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6121, + "end": 6139, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6210, + "end": 6226, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6236, + "end": 6249, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 6369, + "end": 6383, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7180, + "end": 7198, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 7496, + "end": 7507, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7623, + "end": 7637, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7676, + "end": 7691, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7842, + "end": 7856, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7944, + "end": 7959, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8098, + "end": 8116, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 8253, + "end": 8261, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 8420, + "end": 8434, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 8481, + "end": 8495, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 8512, + "end": 8519, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 8560, + "end": 8574, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 8686, + "end": 8700, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 8840, + "end": 8885, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8935, + "end": 8945, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8990, + "end": 9006, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9307, + "end": 9317, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9476, + "end": 9490, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9686, + "end": 9710, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9726, + "end": 9750, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10191, + "end": 10205, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 10344, + "end": 10364, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10403, + "end": 10417, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10510, + "end": 10524, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11702, + "end": 11713, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11754, + "end": 11768, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12661, + "end": 12676, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15415, + "end": 15430, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 16051, + "end": 16071, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16111, + "end": 16135, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16472, + "end": 16486, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17092, + "end": 17121, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17123, + "end": 17165, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17178, + "end": 17228, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17233, + "end": 17254, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17710, + "end": 17718, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 17728, + "end": 17751, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17778, + "end": 17809, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17823, + "end": 17849, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17850, + "end": 17858, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 18478, + "end": 18492, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18579, + "end": 18590, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19054, + "end": 19102, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 19141, + "end": 19159, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20115, + "end": 20152, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20179, + "end": 20238, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20319, + "end": 20333, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20593, + "end": 20608, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21007, + "end": 21022, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21166, + "end": 21176, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 21245, + "end": 21259, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 21394, + "end": 21408, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 21651, + "end": 21738, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21798, + "end": 21819, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 22099, + "end": 22142, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 22674, + "end": 22684, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 22905, + "end": 22913, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 22927, + "end": 22935, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 23212, + "end": 23222, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 23835, + "end": 23870, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 23980, + "end": 23990, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 24101, + "end": 24163, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24187, + "end": 24201, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 24323, + "end": 24345, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 24421, + "end": 24437, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24871, + "end": 24893, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 24928, + "end": 24942, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 25027, + "end": 25049, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 25100, + "end": 25111, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 25279, + "end": 25301, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 25306, + "end": 25316, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 25572, + "end": 25583, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 25616, + "end": 25627, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 25671, + "end": 25693, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 25720, + "end": 25734, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 26067, + "end": 26120, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26170, + "end": 26185, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 26189, + "end": 26254, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26393, + "end": 26404, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 26901, + "end": 26973, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26974, + "end": 26989, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 27107, + "end": 27117, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 27807, + "end": 27818, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 28073, + "end": 28131, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 28204, + "end": 28214, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 28297, + "end": 28325, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 28419, + "end": 28432, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 28434, + "end": 28501, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 28555, + "end": 28565, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 28614, + "end": 28627, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 28629, + "end": 28696, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 28878, + "end": 28891, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 28893, + "end": 28960, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 28999, + "end": 29012, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 29035, + "end": 29051, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 29274, + "end": 29288, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 29779, + "end": 29793, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 29857, + "end": 29875, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 30107, + "end": 30172, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 31669, + "end": 31697, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 31758, + "end": 31772, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 32062, + "end": 32076, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 32126, + "end": 32146, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 32223, + "end": 32237, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 32281, + "end": 32301, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 32352, + "end": 32366, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 32424, + "end": 32444, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 32491, + "end": 32505, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 32527, + "end": 32541, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 32735, + "end": 32749, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 32793, + "end": 32810, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 32828, + "end": 32836, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 34129, + "end": 34146, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 34495, + "end": 34524, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 34897, + "end": 34911, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 35939, + "end": 35976, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 36019, + "end": 36032, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 36136, + "end": 36150, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 37322, + "end": 37340, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 37622, + "end": 37636, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 37736, + "end": 37746, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 37766, + "end": 37789, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 37875, + "end": 37911, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 38046, + "end": 38057, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 38168, + "end": 38204, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 38252, + "end": 38266, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 38355, + "end": 38368, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 38724, + "end": 38738, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 39015, + "end": 39025, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 39553, + "end": 39589, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 40351, + "end": 40361, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 40365, + "end": 40381, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 40668, + "end": 40684, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 41103, + "end": 41117, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 41132, + "end": 41142, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 41215, + "end": 41233, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 41494, + "end": 41512, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 41599, + "end": 41622, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 41687, + "end": 41697, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 41747, + "end": 41763, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 41896, + "end": 41904, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 42055, + "end": 42069, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 42125, + "end": 42139, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 43216, + "end": 43229, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 43311, + "end": 43345, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 43350, + "end": 43380, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 43721, + "end": 43735, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 43918, + "end": 43932, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 44039, + "end": 44047, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 44081, + "end": 44095, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 44112, + "end": 44119, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 44156, + "end": 44170, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 44201, + "end": 44215, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 44280, + "end": 44294, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 44395, + "end": 44409, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 44518, + "end": 44532, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 44860, + "end": 44870, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 45017, + "end": 45031, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 45348, + "end": 45356, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 45424, + "end": 45438, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 45444, + "end": 45458, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 45560, + "end": 45574, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 45617, + "end": 45631, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 45659, + "end": 45667, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 45938, + "end": 45997, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 46041, + "end": 46055, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 50065, + "end": 50076, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 50201, + "end": 50217, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 50221, + "end": 50283, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 50335, + "end": 50354, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 50358, + "end": 50407, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 50412, + "end": 50429, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 50433, + "end": 50511, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 50516, + "end": 50593, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 50602, + "end": 50620, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 50624, + "end": 50687, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 50693, + "end": 50712, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 50728, + "end": 50749, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 51053, + "end": 51070, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 51074, + "end": 51150, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 51562, + "end": 51580, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 51598, + "end": 51660, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 52936, + "end": 52969, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 53367, + "end": 53378, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 53397, + "end": 53412, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 53425, + "end": 53443, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "1373037": [ + { + "start": 70, + "end": 99, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 116, + "end": 141, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 148, + "end": 164, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 185, + "end": 215, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 251, + "end": 265, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 362, + "end": 387, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 529, + "end": 593, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 737, + "end": 764, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 780, + "end": 792, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 904, + "end": 913, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1023, + "end": 1032, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1085, + "end": 1095, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1366, + "end": 1376, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1709, + "end": 1721, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1966, + "end": 1976, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2026, + "end": 2035, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2763, + "end": 2773, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2861, + "end": 2871, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3032, + "end": 3042, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3089, + "end": 3099, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3247, + "end": 3259, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3265, + "end": 3275, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3648, + "end": 3658, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3721, + "end": 3742, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3801, + "end": 3811, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3975, + "end": 3996, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4098, + "end": 4108, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4167, + "end": 4179, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4253, + "end": 4265, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4785, + "end": 4795, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5050, + "end": 5062, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5068, + "end": 5089, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5189, + "end": 5210, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5318, + "end": 5383, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 5723, + "end": 5733, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5953, + "end": 5974, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6008, + "end": 6020, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6085, + "end": 6095, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6256, + "end": 6277, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6654, + "end": 6713, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7888, + "end": 7898, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8096, + "end": 8106, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8422, + "end": 8434, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8462, + "end": 8472, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9230, + "end": 9327, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9339, + "end": 9348, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9454, + "end": 9466, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9664, + "end": 9676, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9953, + "end": 9965, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11404, + "end": 11416, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12059, + "end": 12071, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12251, + "end": 12263, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12517, + "end": 12538, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13111, + "end": 13149, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13241, + "end": 13251, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 13347, + "end": 13359, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13521, + "end": 13576, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 13673, + "end": 13690, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 13768, + "end": 13780, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 14385, + "end": 14397, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 14483, + "end": 14493, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 14678, + "end": 14688, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 14857, + "end": 14874, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15312, + "end": 15322, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 15362, + "end": 15374, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15412, + "end": 15422, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 15517, + "end": 15538, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15639, + "end": 15649, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 15862, + "end": 15883, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16213, + "end": 16234, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16493, + "end": 16514, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16713, + "end": 16734, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16956, + "end": 16974, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16979, + "end": 16989, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17085, + "end": 17102, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17315, + "end": 17327, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17939, + "end": 17951, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18552, + "end": 18572, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18576, + "end": 18621, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18633, + "end": 18650, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18708, + "end": 18779, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18959, + "end": 18969, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19009, + "end": 19030, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 19240, + "end": 19261, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20213, + "end": 20274, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20307, + "end": 20400, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20484, + "end": 20528, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21227, + "end": 21248, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 21329, + "end": 21341, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 21521, + "end": 21542, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 21997, + "end": 22011, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 22080, + "end": 22092, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 22393, + "end": 22414, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 22457, + "end": 22469, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 22609, + "end": 22621, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 22920, + "end": 22932, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 23183, + "end": 23193, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 23235, + "end": 23245, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 23271, + "end": 23283, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 23363, + "end": 23373, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 23800, + "end": 23812, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 24114, + "end": 24124, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 24417, + "end": 24427, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 24433, + "end": 24443, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 24594, + "end": 24604, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 24928, + "end": 24938, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 24965, + "end": 24975, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 25199, + "end": 25211, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 25424, + "end": 25434, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 25793, + "end": 25807, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 25921, + "end": 25937, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "111507500": [ + { + "start": 18, + "end": 40, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 73, + "end": 104, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 121, + "end": 152, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 252, + "end": 264, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 337, + "end": 362, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 378, + "end": 387, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 457, + "end": 489, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 558, + "end": 567, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 652, + "end": 662, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 755, + "end": 765, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 847, + "end": 857, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1399, + "end": 1411, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1740, + "end": 1750, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2647, + "end": 2656, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2739, + "end": 2749, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2921, + "end": 2931, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3009, + "end": 3019, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3282, + "end": 3290, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3341, + "end": 3351, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3493, + "end": 3542, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 3685, + "end": 3695, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3738, + "end": 3795, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 3941, + "end": 3951, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4101, + "end": 4111, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4389, + "end": 4399, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5562, + "end": 5572, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7333, + "end": 7369, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7403, + "end": 7420, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8767, + "end": 8776, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10756, + "end": 10784, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 11050, + "end": 11057, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11461, + "end": 11472, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 13425, + "end": 13437, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14226, + "end": 14265, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15922, + "end": 15982, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16175, + "end": 16220, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16326, + "end": 16363, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 17459, + "end": 17463, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17540, + "end": 17552, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17620, + "end": 17664, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17831, + "end": 17835, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18356, + "end": 18366, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 18587, + "end": 18597, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 18833, + "end": 18843, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19024, + "end": 19034, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19912, + "end": 19971, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20116, + "end": 20126, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 20459, + "end": 20469, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 20529, + "end": 20533, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20884, + "end": 20894, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 20992, + "end": 21015, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 21227, + "end": 21237, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 22222, + "end": 22238, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 22289, + "end": 22301, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 22352, + "end": 22364, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 22377, + "end": 22393, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "149138346": [ + { + "start": 70, + "end": 97, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 114, + "end": 138, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 140, + "end": 167, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 186, + "end": 204, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 222, + "end": 250, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 253, + "end": 281, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 388, + "end": 412, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 478, + "end": 489, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 497, + "end": 544, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 653, + "end": 678, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 794, + "end": 805, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 865, + "end": 920, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1652, + "end": 1667, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1705, + "end": 1720, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1725, + "end": 1740, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1799, + "end": 1826, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1828, + "end": 1833, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1836, + "end": 1850, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1993, + "end": 2008, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2101, + "end": 2116, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2559, + "end": 2575, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2629, + "end": 2640, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2879, + "end": 2929, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 2937, + "end": 2951, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3237, + "end": 3264, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3531, + "end": 3542, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3680, + "end": 3694, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3721, + "end": 3776, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3782, + "end": 3787, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3811, + "end": 3827, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3914, + "end": 3919, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3948, + "end": 3979, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3986, + "end": 4001, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4043, + "end": 4053, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 4083, + "end": 4094, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4236, + "end": 4273, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 4281, + "end": 4292, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 4639, + "end": 4653, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 4823, + "end": 4828, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 4834, + "end": 4839, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 4862, + "end": 4873, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4899, + "end": 4904, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 4912, + "end": 4925, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 5011, + "end": 5022, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5300, + "end": 5305, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5311, + "end": 5322, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5324, + "end": 5353, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 5357, + "end": 5393, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 5626, + "end": 5637, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5693, + "end": 5721, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5792, + "end": 5806, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5868, + "end": 5882, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5937, + "end": 5951, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 6151, + "end": 6165, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 7569, + "end": 7579, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 8362, + "end": 8372, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9017, + "end": 9027, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9801, + "end": 9812, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10029, + "end": 10047, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 10689, + "end": 10707, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 11307, + "end": 11325, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 11731, + "end": 11742, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11956, + "end": 11970, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 12168, + "end": 12182, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 12362, + "end": 12373, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12574, + "end": 12585, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12899, + "end": 12927, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13971, + "end": 13981, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 14217, + "end": 14251, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14318, + "end": 14359, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 14400, + "end": 14429, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15331, + "end": 15354, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15585, + "end": 15645, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15647, + "end": 15725, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15775, + "end": 15785, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 17466, + "end": 17477, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17781, + "end": 17791, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 18030, + "end": 18040, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18078, + "end": 18095, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18216, + "end": 18230, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 18350, + "end": 18367, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18745, + "end": 18768, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 19033, + "end": 19043, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 19204, + "end": 19214, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 19381, + "end": 19391, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 19689, + "end": 19726, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21360, + "end": 21370, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21482, + "end": 21492, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21865, + "end": 21884, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 22287, + "end": 22336, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 22791, + "end": 22838, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 22944, + "end": 22957, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 23165, + "end": 23182, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 24395, + "end": 24400, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 24439, + "end": 24453, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 24614, + "end": 24642, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 24682, + "end": 24710, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 24775, + "end": 24844, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24923, + "end": 24928, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 24935, + "end": 24948, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 24952, + "end": 24969, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 24989, + "end": 25002, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 25006, + "end": 25023, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 25024, + "end": 25037, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 25109, + "end": 25124, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 25153, + "end": 25196, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 25201, + "end": 25241, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 25347, + "end": 25371, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 25409, + "end": 25419, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 25457, + "end": 25468, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 25481, + "end": 25498, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "1305957": [], + "101482639": [ + { + "start": 0, + "end": 37, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 76, + "end": 113, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 127, + "end": 140, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 210, + "end": 220, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 221, + "end": 233, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 234, + "end": 244, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 280, + "end": 289, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 298, + "end": 308, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 712, + "end": 744, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 825, + "end": 848, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 862, + "end": 888, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 921, + "end": 944, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1029, + "end": 1052, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1634, + "end": 1644, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1689, + "end": 1707, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2635, + "end": 2645, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3235, + "end": 3245, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 3288, + "end": 3298, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 3339, + "end": 3348, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 3419, + "end": 3432, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 3514, + "end": 3524, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 3926, + "end": 3929, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4468, + "end": 4473, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 5630, + "end": 5656, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 5702, + "end": 5705, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5897, + "end": 5907, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 6068, + "end": 6078, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6854, + "end": 6864, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7039, + "end": 7049, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7428, + "end": 7438, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 7689, + "end": 7702, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7706, + "end": 7755, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7801, + "end": 7814, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7818, + "end": 7853, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7917, + "end": 7950, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8373, + "end": 8383, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8399, + "end": 8409, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8434, + "end": 8444, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8684, + "end": 8697, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 8827, + "end": 8836, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 10276, + "end": 10286, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10801, + "end": 10805, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 12520, + "end": 12523, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12618, + "end": 12621, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12828, + "end": 12838, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 13751, + "end": 13761, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15409, + "end": 15419, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15509, + "end": 15519, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 16907, + "end": 16917, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 17643, + "end": 17678, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17790, + "end": 17803, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 17886, + "end": 17889, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17928, + "end": 17940, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17964, + "end": 17979, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17988, + "end": 18000, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18062, + "end": 18073, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18087, + "end": 18099, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18125, + "end": 18135, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18140, + "end": 18151, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18227, + "end": 18238, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18280, + "end": 18295, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18297, + "end": 18306, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18311, + "end": 18339, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18383, + "end": 18394, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18424, + "end": 18433, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18457, + "end": 18472, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18477, + "end": 18493, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18552, + "end": 18555, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18661, + "end": 18671, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 18805, + "end": 18818, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 18849, + "end": 18864, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 19208, + "end": 19219, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 19251, + "end": 19261, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 19266, + "end": 19277, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 19284, + "end": 19296, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 19450, + "end": 19462, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 19716, + "end": 19731, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20084, + "end": 20096, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20200, + "end": 20211, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20333, + "end": 20340, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 20525, + "end": 20537, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20628, + "end": 20640, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20736, + "end": 20745, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 20767, + "end": 20774, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 20805, + "end": 20816, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20977, + "end": 20988, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21220, + "end": 21231, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21271, + "end": 21282, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21336, + "end": 21345, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21375, + "end": 21403, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21566, + "end": 21576, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21869, + "end": 21880, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21903, + "end": 21906, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 22013, + "end": 22028, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 22348, + "end": 22363, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 23120, + "end": 23123, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 23264, + "end": 23267, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 23341, + "end": 23344, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 24607, + "end": 24610, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 24654, + "end": 24686, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24688, + "end": 24720, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 25276, + "end": 25279, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 25288, + "end": 25319, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 25321, + "end": 25390, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26302, + "end": 26316, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26318, + "end": 26387, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 27039, + "end": 27068, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 27070, + "end": 27142, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 27242, + "end": 27245, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 27456, + "end": 27491, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 27493, + "end": 27528, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 27582, + "end": 27626, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 27628, + "end": 27740, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 27795, + "end": 27813, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 28394, + "end": 28397, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 28633, + "end": 28644, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 28765, + "end": 28768, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 29214, + "end": 29225, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 29455, + "end": 29510, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 29652, + "end": 29655, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 31049, + "end": 31061, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 34632, + "end": 34635, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 35945, + "end": 35963, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 38066, + "end": 38071, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 38143, + "end": 38156, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 38160, + "end": 38184, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 38295, + "end": 38298, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 38392, + "end": 38395, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 38861, + "end": 38864, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 39641, + "end": 39672, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 39674, + "end": 39743, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 39747, + "end": 39779, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 39781, + "end": 39813, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 39856, + "end": 39867, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 39886, + "end": 39897, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 39962, + "end": 39973, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 40002, + "end": 40009, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 40053, + "end": 40060, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 40128, + "end": 40157, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 40159, + "end": 40231, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 40235, + "end": 40252, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 40788, + "end": 40791, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 41073, + "end": 41084, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 41086, + "end": 41097, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 41256, + "end": 41291, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 41293, + "end": 41328, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 41867, + "end": 41870, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 42140, + "end": 42177, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 42179, + "end": 42216, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 42227, + "end": 42286, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 42370, + "end": 42374, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 42385, + "end": 42395, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 42411, + "end": 42473, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 42562, + "end": 42565, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 43154, + "end": 43168, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 43196, + "end": 43206, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 43208, + "end": 43282, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 43318, + "end": 43335, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 43342, + "end": 43379, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 43390, + "end": 43449, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 43643, + "end": 43646, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 44888, + "end": 44891, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 44977, + "end": 44994, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 45001, + "end": 45038, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 45049, + "end": 45108, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 45192, + "end": 45195, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 45245, + "end": 45248, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 45537, + "end": 45540, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 45654, + "end": 45657, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 45945, + "end": 46007, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 46016, + "end": 46026, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 46149, + "end": 46178, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 46225, + "end": 46237, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 46239, + "end": 46285, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 46810, + "end": 46813, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 46837, + "end": 46856, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 46858, + "end": 46920, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 46974, + "end": 46986, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 47062, + "end": 47065, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 47182, + "end": 47185, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 47702, + "end": 47705, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 47767, + "end": 47796, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 47798, + "end": 47871, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 47925, + "end": 47942, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 47992, + "end": 47995, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 50001, + "end": 50004, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 51000, + "end": 51026, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 51028, + "end": 51054, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 51127, + "end": 51143, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 51213, + "end": 51216, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 51484, + "end": 51487, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 51923, + "end": 51926, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 51971, + "end": 51986, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 52007, + "end": 52022, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 52141, + "end": 52155, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 52319, + "end": 52322, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 52634, + "end": 52682, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 52684, + "end": 52775, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 52829, + "end": 52839, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 52924, + "end": 52928, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 53009, + "end": 53012, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 53118, + "end": 53126, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 53876, + "end": 53879, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 54170, + "end": 54185, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 54187, + "end": 54269, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 54327, + "end": 54339, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 54388, + "end": 54451, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 54489, + "end": 54493, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 54501, + "end": 54511, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 54589, + "end": 54592, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 56367, + "end": 56430, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 56439, + "end": 56449, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 56725, + "end": 56772, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 56774, + "end": 56821, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 56898, + "end": 56908, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 56937, + "end": 57009, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 57038, + "end": 57048, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 58155, + "end": 58165, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 58437, + "end": 58447, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 58922, + "end": 58935, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 58951, + "end": 58958, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 59503, + "end": 59506, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 62215, + "end": 62234, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "1680750": [ + { + "start": 21, + "end": 36, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 85, + "end": 95, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 103, + "end": 123, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 131, + "end": 151, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 152, + "end": 165, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 176, + "end": 189, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 190, + "end": 206, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 207, + "end": 223, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 229, + "end": 260, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 500, + "end": 516, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 717, + "end": 748, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1157, + "end": 1167, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2244, + "end": 2301, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 3530, + "end": 3579, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 4104, + "end": 4114, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4517, + "end": 4545, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 4610, + "end": 4624, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4640, + "end": 4650, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4668, + "end": 4689, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 4691, + "end": 4713, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 4715, + "end": 4733, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 4735, + "end": 4746, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 4748, + "end": 4762, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 4764, + "end": 4774, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 4779, + "end": 4791, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 4812, + "end": 4830, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 4835, + "end": 4850, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 4915, + "end": 4931, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 5007, + "end": 5027, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5093, + "end": 5125, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5161, + "end": 5177, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5291, + "end": 5310, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5319, + "end": 5334, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 5426, + "end": 5436, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6083, + "end": 6099, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 6470, + "end": 6489, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 6836, + "end": 6867, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7455, + "end": 7471, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 7662, + "end": 7675, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 7831, + "end": 7850, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 7920, + "end": 7950, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 7958, + "end": 7972, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8245, + "end": 8254, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8256, + "end": 8273, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8314, + "end": 8332, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8397, + "end": 8422, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 8442, + "end": 8456, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8466, + "end": 8494, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 8559, + "end": 8598, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 8852, + "end": 8866, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9165, + "end": 9227, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 9245, + "end": 9269, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9275, + "end": 9285, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9815, + "end": 9823, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10104, + "end": 10120, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10245, + "end": 10277, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 10851, + "end": 10876, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 11614, + "end": 11625, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 12115, + "end": 12126, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 12697, + "end": 12708, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 12929, + "end": 12954, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 13765, + "end": 13775, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 13804, + "end": 13815, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 14220, + "end": 14229, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 14351, + "end": 14361, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 15735, + "end": 15745, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 16308, + "end": 16319, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 16328, + "end": 16338, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 18642, + "end": 18652, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 20913, + "end": 20934, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 21400, + "end": 21411, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 21485, + "end": 21495, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 21811, + "end": 21835, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 22205, + "end": 22215, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 23523, + "end": 23552, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 25468, + "end": 25479, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 25488, + "end": 25498, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 26833, + "end": 26882, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 27887, + "end": 27903, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 28181, + "end": 28191, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 29806, + "end": 29816, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 30206, + "end": 30230, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 32527, + "end": 32551, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 32699, + "end": 32710, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 33453, + "end": 33463, + "label": "COURT" + } + ], + "10104667": [ + { + "start": 107, + "end": 137, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 157, + "end": 187, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 209, + "end": 225, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 268, + "end": 292, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 299, + "end": 308, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 323, + "end": 362, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 635, + "end": 664, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 744, + "end": 754, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 790, + "end": 796, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1200, + "end": 1209, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1900, + "end": 1910, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3088, + "end": 3096, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3199, + "end": 3208, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4002, + "end": 4019, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4106, + "end": 4116, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5175, + "end": 5182, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5194, + "end": 5208, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5210, + "end": 5232, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5234, + "end": 5270, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5361, + "end": 5390, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 8479, + "end": 8485, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8507, + "end": 8536, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 8949, + "end": 8973, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9166, + "end": 9197, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9407, + "end": 9431, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9605, + "end": 9612, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 9628, + "end": 9657, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 10138, + "end": 10167, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 10331, + "end": 10337, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10495, + "end": 10524, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 10651, + "end": 10667, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 10887, + "end": 10898, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11317, + "end": 11334, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11815, + "end": 11824, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12571, + "end": 12579, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12779, + "end": 12792, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 12808, + "end": 12887, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 13238, + "end": 13248, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 13486, + "end": 13492, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 14701, + "end": 14708, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15185, + "end": 15192, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15377, + "end": 15384, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15760, + "end": 15772, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16232, + "end": 16249, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16262, + "end": 16286, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18062, + "end": 18068, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 18072, + "end": 18130, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18210, + "end": 18266, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18681, + "end": 18692, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 18699, + "end": 18708, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 18719, + "end": 18754, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 19573, + "end": 19588, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 19821, + "end": 19859, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20174, + "end": 20191, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 20388, + "end": 20452, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20520, + "end": 20588, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21338, + "end": 21373, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21454, + "end": 21508, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21696, + "end": 21708, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 21752, + "end": 21771, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 22069, + "end": 22079, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 22354, + "end": 22362, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 22535, + "end": 22552, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 22571, + "end": 22590, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 22591, + "end": 22609, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 23274, + "end": 23293, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 23308, + "end": 23347, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 23350, + "end": 23386, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 23427, + "end": 23442, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 23592, + "end": 23616, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 25257, + "end": 25271, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 25694, + "end": 25709, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 25712, + "end": 25728, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 25747, + "end": 25766, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 25774, + "end": 25794, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 25831, + "end": 25848, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 27401, + "end": 27413, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 29056, + "end": 29067, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 29411, + "end": 29422, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 29515, + "end": 29526, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 29841, + "end": 29852, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 29868, + "end": 29881, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 31930, + "end": 31954, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 32337, + "end": 32361, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 33731, + "end": 33737, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 33753, + "end": 33767, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 33868, + "end": 33880, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 34518, + "end": 34542, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 34622, + "end": 34633, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 35221, + "end": 35227, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 35231, + "end": 35248, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 35429, + "end": 35453, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 36511, + "end": 36520, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 36597, + "end": 36614, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 36633, + "end": 36651, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 36775, + "end": 36794, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 36802, + "end": 36821, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 36823, + "end": 36844, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 37163, + "end": 37177, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 39271, + "end": 39282, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 39290, + "end": 39299, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 39614, + "end": 39638, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 41792, + "end": 41801, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 44001, + "end": 44032, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 44274, + "end": 44305, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 44473, + "end": 44504, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 45027, + "end": 45044, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 45384, + "end": 45401, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 45423, + "end": 45447, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 46310, + "end": 46320, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 46745, + "end": 46760, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 48005, + "end": 48015, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 48194, + "end": 48207, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 48478, + "end": 48488, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 50602, + "end": 50615, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 52044, + "end": 52074, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 53244, + "end": 53262, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 53552, + "end": 53577, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 53621, + "end": 53639, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 56578, + "end": 56584, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 56833, + "end": 56848, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 56887, + "end": 56904, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 56917, + "end": 56934, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "1716348": [ + { + "start": 10, + "end": 35, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 48, + "end": 54, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 67, + "end": 81, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 109, + "end": 119, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 127, + "end": 137, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 144, + "end": 158, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 284, + "end": 294, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 309, + "end": 325, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 329, + "end": 371, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 391, + "end": 401, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 455, + "end": 487, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 518, + "end": 525, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 555, + "end": 570, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 711, + "end": 721, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 936, + "end": 946, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 1052, + "end": 1089, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1106, + "end": 1113, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1255, + "end": 1262, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1285, + "end": 1300, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1420, + "end": 1427, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1609, + "end": 1623, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1678, + "end": 1687, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1840, + "end": 1849, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1869, + "end": 1911, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1923, + "end": 1939, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2017, + "end": 2027, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2165, + "end": 2172, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2290, + "end": 2300, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2322, + "end": 2331, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2470, + "end": 2480, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2667, + "end": 2674, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2858, + "end": 2868, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3051, + "end": 3061, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3193, + "end": 3206, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 3264, + "end": 3276, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 3333, + "end": 3345, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 3478, + "end": 3488, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3522, + "end": 3529, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3672, + "end": 3679, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3703, + "end": 3706, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 3822, + "end": 3832, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 3969, + "end": 3998, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 4006, + "end": 4064, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4150, + "end": 4157, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4400, + "end": 4407, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 4711, + "end": 4721, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4815, + "end": 4825, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5446, + "end": 5453, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5584, + "end": 5594, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5713, + "end": 5722, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5726, + "end": 5730, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 5740, + "end": 5755, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 5913, + "end": 5923, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5988, + "end": 5998, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6030, + "end": 6037, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6097, + "end": 6111, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 6249, + "end": 6256, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6303, + "end": 6313, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6620, + "end": 6630, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6858, + "end": 6867, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6896, + "end": 6918, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 6930, + "end": 6973, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7039, + "end": 7073, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7452, + "end": 7486, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7710, + "end": 7727, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7850, + "end": 7857, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7901, + "end": 7915, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 7945, + "end": 7948, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 7993, + "end": 8003, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8088, + "end": 8098, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8172, + "end": 8179, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8243, + "end": 8253, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8602, + "end": 8612, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8735, + "end": 8745, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8825, + "end": 8868, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9018, + "end": 9028, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9058, + "end": 9068, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9208, + "end": 9218, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9263, + "end": 9295, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9458, + "end": 9468, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9584, + "end": 9613, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 9726, + "end": 9758, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11231, + "end": 11241, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 11475, + "end": 11485, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 11622, + "end": 11651, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 11659, + "end": 11717, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 11798, + "end": 11805, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 11985, + "end": 11992, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12280, + "end": 12290, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 12436, + "end": 12446, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 12725, + "end": 12732, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13520, + "end": 13527, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13626, + "end": 13652, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 13976, + "end": 13979, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 14017, + "end": 14027, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 14231, + "end": 14241, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 14285, + "end": 14314, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 14322, + "end": 14380, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 14430, + "end": 14440, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 15027, + "end": 15056, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 16077, + "end": 16084, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17334, + "end": 17341, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17403, + "end": 17410, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17419, + "end": 17429, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 17806, + "end": 17867, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17949, + "end": 18005, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18150, + "end": 18176, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18525, + "end": 18551, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18616, + "end": 18683, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 19813, + "end": 19823, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19943, + "end": 19946, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 20039, + "end": 20049, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 20093, + "end": 20122, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 20287, + "end": 20297, + "label": "COURT" + } + ], + "49260341": [ + { + "start": 18, + "end": 40, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 73, + "end": 104, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 107, + "end": 135, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 137, + "end": 158, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 180, + "end": 195, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 216, + "end": 247, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 250, + "end": 273, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 275, + "end": 306, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 309, + "end": 331, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 342, + "end": 355, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 415, + "end": 419, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 420, + "end": 438, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 443, + "end": 447, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 448, + "end": 466, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 604, + "end": 621, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 623, + "end": 626, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 654, + "end": 658, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 700, + "end": 710, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 788, + "end": 796, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 869, + "end": 872, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1187, + "end": 1190, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1339, + "end": 1347, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1505, + "end": 1513, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1735, + "end": 1738, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1871, + "end": 1879, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2030, + "end": 2043, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 2092, + "end": 2095, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2290, + "end": 2293, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2469, + "end": 2479, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2672, + "end": 2695, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 4759, + "end": 4762, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5437, + "end": 5447, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6206, + "end": 6209, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6257, + "end": 6267, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6380, + "end": 6383, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6746, + "end": 6756, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6958, + "end": 6981, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 7159, + "end": 7169, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7264, + "end": 7267, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7719, + "end": 7722, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7861, + "end": 7864, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8607, + "end": 8610, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8671, + "end": 8681, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8715, + "end": 8718, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8768, + "end": 8771, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8871, + "end": 8874, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9140, + "end": 9150, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9355, + "end": 9358, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9427, + "end": 9430, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9500, + "end": 9503, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9522, + "end": 9525, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 10043, + "end": 10057, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10088, + "end": 10107, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 10142, + "end": 10191, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10268, + "end": 10271, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12230, + "end": 12233, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12256, + "end": 12259, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12304, + "end": 12307, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12419, + "end": 12422, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12781, + "end": 12784, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13220, + "end": 13223, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13600, + "end": 13603, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 14192, + "end": 14195, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 14321, + "end": 14324, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15023, + "end": 15026, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 15576, + "end": 15579, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16143, + "end": 16146, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16206, + "end": 16209, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16560, + "end": 16563, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17038, + "end": 17041, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17102, + "end": 17143, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17279, + "end": 17282, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17768, + "end": 17771, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17809, + "end": 17812, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18594, + "end": 18597, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18806, + "end": 18809, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 19807, + "end": 19823, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19827, + "end": 19871, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20123, + "end": 20171, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20556, + "end": 20607, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21280, + "end": 21326, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24690, + "end": 24693, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 25246, + "end": 25256, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 26081, + "end": 26133, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26357, + "end": 26412, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26502, + "end": 26505, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 26673, + "end": 26676, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 26774, + "end": 26777, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 28201, + "end": 28259, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 28504, + "end": 28514, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 29876, + "end": 29879, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 31800, + "end": 31842, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 32238, + "end": 32247, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 32351, + "end": 32407, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 32437, + "end": 32440, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 32603, + "end": 32606, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 33422, + "end": 33432, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 33436, + "end": 33496, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 34688, + "end": 34761, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 35967, + "end": 35981, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 36044, + "end": 36047, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 36059, + "end": 36069, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 36466, + "end": 36476, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 36814, + "end": 36824, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 37024, + "end": 37027, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 37944, + "end": 37947, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 38543, + "end": 38546, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 39106, + "end": 39109, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 39217, + "end": 39220, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 39615, + "end": 39618, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 40171, + "end": 40174, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 40499, + "end": 40509, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 41993, + "end": 41996, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 42055, + "end": 42078, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 42366, + "end": 42369, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 43134, + "end": 43137, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 43470, + "end": 43473, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 43658, + "end": 43661, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 44127, + "end": 44130, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 44565, + "end": 44568, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 44578, + "end": 44588, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 44636, + "end": 44639, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 44829, + "end": 44839, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 44965, + "end": 44969, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 44970, + "end": 44988, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 44993, + "end": 44997, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 44998, + "end": 45016, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 45034, + "end": 45057, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 45091, + "end": 45109, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 45126, + "end": 45139, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 45152, + "end": 45168, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "1890994": [ + { + "start": 10, + "end": 37, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 50, + "end": 74, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 138, + "end": 148, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 156, + "end": 170, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 173, + "end": 185, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 269, + "end": 283, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 546, + "end": 563, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 722, + "end": 730, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 880, + "end": 890, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 904, + "end": 914, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 960, + "end": 968, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1000, + "end": 1008, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1061, + "end": 1071, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1103, + "end": 1139, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1450, + "end": 1460, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1509, + "end": 1513, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2104, + "end": 2114, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2149, + "end": 2165, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2238, + "end": 2248, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2314, + "end": 2324, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2569, + "end": 2579, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2761, + "end": 2771, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 2787, + "end": 2797, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2901, + "end": 2928, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2944, + "end": 2956, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3328, + "end": 3352, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3381, + "end": 3391, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3786, + "end": 3804, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 3810, + "end": 3865, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 3870, + "end": 3879, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3887, + "end": 3902, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 3908, + "end": 3958, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 3969, + "end": 3978, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4023, + "end": 4033, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 4442, + "end": 4452, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 4571, + "end": 4581, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 4694, + "end": 4704, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 4791, + "end": 4801, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 4886, + "end": 4896, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5202, + "end": 5212, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5365, + "end": 5375, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 5892, + "end": 5968, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 5992, + "end": 6002, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 6076, + "end": 6107, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 6162, + "end": 6172, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7081, + "end": 7091, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7151, + "end": 7235, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7281, + "end": 7343, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 7348, + "end": 7427, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8001, + "end": 8021, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8156, + "end": 8181, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8197, + "end": 8209, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8327, + "end": 8337, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 8356, + "end": 8366, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 8527, + "end": 8539, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 8546, + "end": 8618, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8620, + "end": 8670, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8672, + "end": 8744, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8746, + "end": 8809, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8814, + "end": 8889, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9025, + "end": 9030, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9071, + "end": 9137, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9857, + "end": 9869, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9873, + "end": 9883, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10204, + "end": 10266, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 10583, + "end": 10593, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 10661, + "end": 10730, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12411, + "end": 12504, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14199, + "end": 14260, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15678, + "end": 15711, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16195, + "end": 16269, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17370, + "end": 17443, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 19199, + "end": 19233, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20996, + "end": 21114, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21116, + "end": 21179, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21255, + "end": 21326, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21331, + "end": 21416, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21437, + "end": 21449, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 21476, + "end": 21486, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 21568, + "end": 21578, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 21625, + "end": 21635, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 22161, + "end": 22171, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 22333, + "end": 22345, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 22435, + "end": 22451, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 22687, + "end": 22699, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 22709, + "end": 22776, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 23005, + "end": 23021, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 23100, + "end": 23110, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 23353, + "end": 23363, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 23817, + "end": 23827, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 24188, + "end": 24258, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24530, + "end": 24540, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 24788, + "end": 24798, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 25000, + "end": 25119, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 25127, + "end": 25206, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 25237, + "end": 25247, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 25798, + "end": 25808, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 26736, + "end": 26746, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 26858, + "end": 26868, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 26931, + "end": 26941, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 26964, + "end": 26974, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 27287, + "end": 27297, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 27498, + "end": 27508, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 27715, + "end": 27725, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 28049, + "end": 28059, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 28168, + "end": 28178, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 28311, + "end": 28321, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 28612, + "end": 28622, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 28639, + "end": 28649, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 28734, + "end": 28750, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 28823, + "end": 28833, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 29029, + "end": 29039, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 29333, + "end": 29343, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 29475, + "end": 29485, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 29551, + "end": 29561, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 29626, + "end": 29636, + "label": "COURT" + } + ], + "199441852": [ + { + "start": 0, + "end": 20, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 70, + "end": 80, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 114, + "end": 126, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 127, + "end": 147, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 150, + "end": 156, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 183, + "end": 197, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 236, + "end": 260, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 280, + "end": 331, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 386, + "end": 438, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 465, + "end": 517, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 606, + "end": 658, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 774, + "end": 794, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 840, + "end": 861, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1006, + "end": 1016, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1049, + "end": 1072, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1123, + "end": 1133, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1241, + "end": 1251, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1406, + "end": 1420, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 1449, + "end": 1468, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 1533, + "end": 1544, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 1631, + "end": 1641, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1699, + "end": 1709, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1767, + "end": 1777, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1975, + "end": 1985, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2158, + "end": 2178, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 2219, + "end": 2229, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2300, + "end": 2306, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 2401, + "end": 2411, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2415, + "end": 2425, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2430, + "end": 2440, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2442, + "end": 2452, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2457, + "end": 2467, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2646, + "end": 2656, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2964, + "end": 2970, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 3212, + "end": 3222, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3543, + "end": 3553, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3620, + "end": 3640, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 3659, + "end": 3669, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3699, + "end": 3709, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3808, + "end": 3818, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5004, + "end": 5024, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 5639, + "end": 5651, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5731, + "end": 5752, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 6009, + "end": 6026, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 6033, + "end": 6041, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6048, + "end": 6069, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 6113, + "end": 6123, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 6160, + "end": 6170, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6276, + "end": 6286, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 6361, + "end": 6371, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6385, + "end": 6405, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 6586, + "end": 6597, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6667, + "end": 6708, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 6758, + "end": 6768, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 6794, + "end": 6806, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6956, + "end": 6966, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7077, + "end": 7087, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8084, + "end": 8094, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8115, + "end": 8135, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 8184, + "end": 8228, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9287, + "end": 9318, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9320, + "end": 9356, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9396, + "end": 9424, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9426, + "end": 9460, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9564, + "end": 9603, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 9818, + "end": 9838, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 11454, + "end": 11474, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 12541, + "end": 12573, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 12600, + "end": 12610, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 12670, + "end": 12691, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12753, + "end": 12763, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 13096, + "end": 13116, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 13799, + "end": 13820, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 13826, + "end": 13836, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 14334, + "end": 14354, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 15228, + "end": 15238, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15240, + "end": 15250, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15255, + "end": 15265, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15300, + "end": 15310, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15315, + "end": 15325, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15768, + "end": 15788, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 17226, + "end": 17246, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 17726, + "end": 17747, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 17774, + "end": 17784, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 17831, + "end": 17852, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18696, + "end": 18716, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 20277, + "end": 20297, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 20596, + "end": 20606, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 20657, + "end": 20677, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 20714, + "end": 20728, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 20730, + "end": 20754, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 20774, + "end": 20825, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 20880, + "end": 20932, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 20959, + "end": 21011, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 21100, + "end": 21152, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 21234, + "end": 21254, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 21255, + "end": 21267, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 21276, + "end": 21296, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 21297, + "end": 21307, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "110007179": [ + { + "start": 20, + "end": 42, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 243, + "end": 326, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 337, + "end": 353, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 423, + "end": 433, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 448, + "end": 467, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 488, + "end": 500, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 526, + "end": 545, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 580, + "end": 609, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 625, + "end": 649, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 740, + "end": 750, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1004, + "end": 1014, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1052, + "end": 1071, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1271, + "end": 1284, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1299, + "end": 1306, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 1459, + "end": 1478, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1986, + "end": 2002, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 2088, + "end": 2106, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2543, + "end": 2561, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3589, + "end": 3608, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3968, + "end": 3987, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 4076, + "end": 4094, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4201, + "end": 4219, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4463, + "end": 4479, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 4625, + "end": 4643, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4690, + "end": 4710, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4894, + "end": 4904, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4909, + "end": 4937, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 4940, + "end": 4943, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5117, + "end": 5120, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5365, + "end": 5393, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5728, + "end": 5731, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5761, + "end": 5771, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 5776, + "end": 5779, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 6055, + "end": 6065, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6478, + "end": 6488, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6490, + "end": 6523, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 7915, + "end": 7925, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 7945, + "end": 7955, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 8026, + "end": 8081, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8247, + "end": 8260, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8276, + "end": 8347, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 8353, + "end": 8366, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 8382, + "end": 8389, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 11319, + "end": 11327, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 11594, + "end": 11607, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 11792, + "end": 11813, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 12130, + "end": 12139, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12258, + "end": 12266, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 12568, + "end": 12571, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 13068, + "end": 13077, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 13272, + "end": 13281, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 13355, + "end": 13368, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 13384, + "end": 13392, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 13454, + "end": 13461, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 13556, + "end": 13564, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 13861, + "end": 13870, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 13922, + "end": 13931, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 14108, + "end": 14118, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 14464, + "end": 14479, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 14513, + "end": 14523, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 14898, + "end": 14908, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 14936, + "end": 14946, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 15112, + "end": 15122, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15237, + "end": 15265, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 15281, + "end": 15302, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 15331, + "end": 15341, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15721, + "end": 15731, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 15955, + "end": 15965, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 16085, + "end": 16095, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 16943, + "end": 16956, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 17002, + "end": 17017, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 17082, + "end": 17095, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 17170, + "end": 17180, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 17240, + "end": 17248, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 17310, + "end": 17351, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17482, + "end": 17492, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 17666, + "end": 17675, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 17757, + "end": 17765, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 17881, + "end": 17926, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18135, + "end": 18156, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18263, + "end": 18271, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 18290, + "end": 18300, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 18455, + "end": 18463, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 18512, + "end": 18520, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 19244, + "end": 19269, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 21202, + "end": 21218, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21221, + "end": 21237, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21243, + "end": 21257, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 21746, + "end": 21760, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 21766, + "end": 21782, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 22644, + "end": 22652, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 22836, + "end": 22855, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 22864, + "end": 22880, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 22927, + "end": 22946, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 23134, + "end": 23150, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 23413, + "end": 23432, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 23441, + "end": 23457, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 24377, + "end": 24385, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 24731, + "end": 24741, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 24778, + "end": 24826, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24860, + "end": 24882, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24886, + "end": 24938, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24942, + "end": 24989, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 25005, + "end": 25038, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 25396, + "end": 25427, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 25487, + "end": 25508, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 25585, + "end": 25593, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 25635, + "end": 25650, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 25881, + "end": 25889, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 25930, + "end": 25951, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26148, + "end": 26156, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 26215, + "end": 26226, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26247, + "end": 26255, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 26259, + "end": 26298, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 26299, + "end": 26346, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 26391, + "end": 26401, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 26450, + "end": 26460, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 26576, + "end": 26586, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 26760, + "end": 26770, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 26812, + "end": 26822, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 26827, + "end": 26836, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 27166, + "end": 27172, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 27398, + "end": 27406, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 27892, + "end": 27900, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 28448, + "end": 28456, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 28663, + "end": 28671, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 28816, + "end": 28825, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 28980, + "end": 28988, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 29086, + "end": 29094, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 29324, + "end": 29332, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 29408, + "end": 29416, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 29621, + "end": 29629, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 30176, + "end": 30185, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 30211, + "end": 30219, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 30514, + "end": 30522, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 30713, + "end": 30721, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 30791, + "end": 30798, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 31105, + "end": 31113, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 31542, + "end": 31550, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 31555, + "end": 31561, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 31601, + "end": 31622, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 31833, + "end": 31841, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 31902, + "end": 31912, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 32064, + "end": 32072, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 32918, + "end": 32928, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 34427, + "end": 34440, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 35369, + "end": 35382, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 36245, + "end": 36257, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 36269, + "end": 36283, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "95803467": [ + { + "start": 18, + "end": 40, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 99, + "end": 113, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 132, + "end": 145, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 227, + "end": 255, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 406, + "end": 425, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 442, + "end": 456, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 517, + "end": 530, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 596, + "end": 606, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 619, + "end": 631, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 941, + "end": 951, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1040, + "end": 1052, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 1244, + "end": 1254, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1380, + "end": 1394, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1884, + "end": 1898, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 1940, + "end": 1952, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 2102, + "end": 2114, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 2131, + "end": 2143, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 2160, + "end": 2174, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 2191, + "end": 2204, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 3224, + "end": 3236, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 3242, + "end": 3254, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 3260, + "end": 3274, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 3350, + "end": 3354, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 3478, + "end": 3482, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 4132, + "end": 4136, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 4322, + "end": 4326, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 4355, + "end": 4359, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 4494, + "end": 4498, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 4500, + "end": 4504, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 4509, + "end": 4513, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 4622, + "end": 4626, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 4803, + "end": 4807, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 4954, + "end": 4966, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 4974, + "end": 4986, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 4994, + "end": 5007, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 5015, + "end": 5029, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 5163, + "end": 5167, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 5169, + "end": 5173, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 5175, + "end": 5179, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 5184, + "end": 5188, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 5263, + "end": 5267, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 5271, + "end": 5275, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 5375, + "end": 5379, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 5436, + "end": 5440, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 5525, + "end": 5529, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 6040, + "end": 6061, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6187, + "end": 6197, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 14600, + "end": 14641, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 16224, + "end": 16234, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 16710, + "end": 16720, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 16729, + "end": 16741, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 16858, + "end": 16868, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 16985, + "end": 16997, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 16999, + "end": 17011, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 17013, + "end": 17027, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 17033, + "end": 17046, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 17088, + "end": 17098, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 17215, + "end": 17227, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 17229, + "end": 17241, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 17243, + "end": 17257, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 17263, + "end": 17276, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 17324, + "end": 17334, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 17444, + "end": 17454, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 17502, + "end": 17516, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 17550, + "end": 17560, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 17569, + "end": 17581, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 17583, + "end": 17595, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 17597, + "end": 17611, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 17613, + "end": 17626, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 17766, + "end": 17776, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 19099, + "end": 19117, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20020, + "end": 20032, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 20071, + "end": 20085, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 20197, + "end": 20209, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 20274, + "end": 20288, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 20306, + "end": 20318, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 20388, + "end": 20401, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 20496, + "end": 20510, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 20514, + "end": 20524, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 20601, + "end": 20613, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 20859, + "end": 20872, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 20877, + "end": 20889, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 20897, + "end": 20907, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 20988, + "end": 20998, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21231, + "end": 21241, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21260, + "end": 21274, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 21285, + "end": 21301, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 21355, + "end": 21365, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21420, + "end": 21430, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21526, + "end": 21545, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21591, + "end": 21609, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21712, + "end": 21722, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 21728, + "end": 21744, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 22306, + "end": 22322, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 22667, + "end": 22676, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 22682, + "end": 22687, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 22696, + "end": 22701, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 23864, + "end": 23869, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 24314, + "end": 24319, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 24432, + "end": 24473, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 24782, + "end": 24807, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 24810, + "end": 24822, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 24855, + "end": 24915, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24918, + "end": 24934, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24938, + "end": 24994, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24997, + "end": 25023, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 25031, + "end": 25100, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 25103, + "end": 25118, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26122, + "end": 26140, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26142, + "end": 26180, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26209, + "end": 26235, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26237, + "end": 26303, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26306, + "end": 26324, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26326, + "end": 26399, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26402, + "end": 26433, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26435, + "end": 26523, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26526, + "end": 26534, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26536, + "end": 26606, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26609, + "end": 26632, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26634, + "end": 26724, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26727, + "end": 26734, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26736, + "end": 26803, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26809, + "end": 26817, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26819, + "end": 26874, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 26939, + "end": 26955, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 27415, + "end": 27473, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 27476, + "end": 27480, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 27499, + "end": 27574, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 28936, + "end": 28977, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 29680, + "end": 29748, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 29776, + "end": 29859, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 29883, + "end": 29945, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 30373, + "end": 30383, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 30442, + "end": 30503, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 30506, + "end": 30519, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 30526, + "end": 30592, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 30595, + "end": 30611, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 31564, + "end": 31576, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 31624, + "end": 31637, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 31735, + "end": 31746, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 31842, + "end": 31846, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 31878, + "end": 31931, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 32342, + "end": 32358, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 32368, + "end": 32379, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 32641, + "end": 32651, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 32712, + "end": 32724, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 32831, + "end": 32845, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 33084, + "end": 33098, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 33252, + "end": 33262, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 33272, + "end": 33284, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 33356, + "end": 33370, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 33384, + "end": 33396, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 33486, + "end": 33499, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 33535, + "end": 33549, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 33934, + "end": 33950, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 33977, + "end": 34003, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 34037, + "end": 34052, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 34086, + "end": 34168, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 34192, + "end": 34263, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 34473, + "end": 34560, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 35145, + "end": 35161, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 35254, + "end": 35304, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 35633, + "end": 35646, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 35659, + "end": 35675, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 35749, + "end": 35806, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 35809, + "end": 35821, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 35932, + "end": 35944, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 35987, + "end": 36003, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 36016, + "end": 36042, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 36344, + "end": 36430, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 36492, + "end": 36596, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 36611, + "end": 36632, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 36639, + "end": 36690, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 36765, + "end": 36774, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 36860, + "end": 36884, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 36909, + "end": 36933, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 38775, + "end": 38796, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 38803, + "end": 38854, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 38898, + "end": 38904, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 38912, + "end": 38936, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 38956, + "end": 38980, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 39306, + "end": 39312, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 39517, + "end": 39523, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 39559, + "end": 39580, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 39586, + "end": 39601, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 40831, + "end": 40846, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 40874, + "end": 40889, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 42406, + "end": 42421, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 43170, + "end": 43185, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 43202, + "end": 43222, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 43339, + "end": 43354, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 43359, + "end": 43373, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 44011, + "end": 44038, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 44040, + "end": 44131, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 44550, + "end": 44644, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 44668, + "end": 44680, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 44818, + "end": 44875, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 45778, + "end": 45793, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 45828, + "end": 45855, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 45857, + "end": 45926, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 46006, + "end": 46023, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 46025, + "end": 46107, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 46414, + "end": 46438, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 46440, + "end": 46538, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 51738, + "end": 51753, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 51762, + "end": 51774, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 51881, + "end": 51904, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 51906, + "end": 52017, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 52224, + "end": 52239, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 52493, + "end": 52506, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 52513, + "end": 52629, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 53562, + "end": 53575, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 53582, + "end": 53698, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 55187, + "end": 55202, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 55247, + "end": 55263, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 55265, + "end": 55312, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 55949, + "end": 55964, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 57065, + "end": 57101, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 57103, + "end": 57207, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 58533, + "end": 58546, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 58548, + "end": 58634, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 58637, + "end": 58650, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 58763, + "end": 58826, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 58828, + "end": 58934, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 59156, + "end": 59172, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 59174, + "end": 59221, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 59227, + "end": 59251, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 59253, + "end": 59351, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 59532, + "end": 59547, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 59560, + "end": 59573, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 59575, + "end": 59661, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 60352, + "end": 60368, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 60370, + "end": 60417, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 60423, + "end": 60447, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 60449, + "end": 60547, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 60767, + "end": 60790, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 60797, + "end": 60908, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 60926, + "end": 60958, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 60991, + "end": 61023, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 61072, + "end": 61109, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 61111, + "end": 61227, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 61543, + "end": 61568, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 61570, + "end": 61630, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 61646, + "end": 61678, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 61680, + "end": 61712, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 62717, + "end": 62732, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 63352, + "end": 63368, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 63370, + "end": 63417, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 63524, + "end": 63539, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 63610, + "end": 63620, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 63689, + "end": 63697, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 63818, + "end": 63833, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 64395, + "end": 64410, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 65926, + "end": 66010, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 66061, + "end": 66073, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 66132, + "end": 66144, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 66146, + "end": 66203, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 66256, + "end": 66269, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 66271, + "end": 66332, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 66338, + "end": 66354, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 66356, + "end": 66422, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 66494, + "end": 66506, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 66508, + "end": 66565, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 66679, + "end": 66726, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 67249, + "end": 67259, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 67611, + "end": 67623, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 68681, + "end": 68694, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 68707, + "end": 68723, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 69245, + "end": 69261, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 69274, + "end": 69300, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 69370, + "end": 69391, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 69927, + "end": 69937, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 69985, + "end": 69995, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 70229, + "end": 70257, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 70293, + "end": 70321, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 70404, + "end": 70432, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 70603, + "end": 70617, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 70631, + "end": 70645, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "37724412": [ + { + "start": 111, + "end": 121, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 202, + "end": 217, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 222, + "end": 228, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 274, + "end": 278, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 285, + "end": 306, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 332, + "end": 339, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 344, + "end": 351, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 385, + "end": 392, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 438, + "end": 445, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 525, + "end": 540, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 696, + "end": 716, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 876, + "end": 887, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 922, + "end": 935, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 1051, + "end": 1063, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 1101, + "end": 1111, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1147, + "end": 1157, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1230, + "end": 1239, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1301, + "end": 1324, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 1447, + "end": 1464, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1579, + "end": 1596, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1891, + "end": 1908, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1958, + "end": 1972, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 2155, + "end": 2172, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2377, + "end": 2394, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2415, + "end": 2428, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 2435, + "end": 2454, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 2461, + "end": 2481, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 2486, + "end": 2506, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 2520, + "end": 2546, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 2563, + "end": 2586, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 2690, + "end": 2701, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 2790, + "end": 2803, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 2983, + "end": 3006, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 3139, + "end": 3153, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 3313, + "end": 3327, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 3479, + "end": 3496, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 3660, + "end": 3674, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 3764, + "end": 3777, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 3801, + "end": 3815, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 3860, + "end": 3875, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 3932, + "end": 3945, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 3977, + "end": 3990, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 4055, + "end": 4062, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 4103, + "end": 4116, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 4121, + "end": 4130, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4138, + "end": 4153, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 4209, + "end": 4224, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 4240, + "end": 4253, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 4283, + "end": 4296, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 4360, + "end": 4369, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4383, + "end": 4398, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 4439, + "end": 4446, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 4564, + "end": 4578, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 4598, + "end": 4612, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 4776, + "end": 4790, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 4890, + "end": 4903, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 4908, + "end": 4919, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 4968, + "end": 4980, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 4982, + "end": 4995, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 5041, + "end": 5054, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 5110, + "end": 5118, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 5174, + "end": 5182, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 5337, + "end": 5343, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 5356, + "end": 5370, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 5413, + "end": 5421, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 5534, + "end": 5551, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 5694, + "end": 5702, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 5866, + "end": 5873, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 6002, + "end": 6021, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 6048, + "end": 6054, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 6064, + "end": 6068, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 6079, + "end": 6086, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 6100, + "end": 6115, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 6141, + "end": 6147, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 6157, + "end": 6171, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 6196, + "end": 6210, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 6307, + "end": 6320, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 6481, + "end": 6487, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 6489, + "end": 6496, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 6564, + "end": 6573, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6874, + "end": 6891, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7029, + "end": 7042, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 7052, + "end": 7064, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 7074, + "end": 7086, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 7096, + "end": 7109, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 7122, + "end": 7133, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 7174, + "end": 7180, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 7319, + "end": 7342, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 7434, + "end": 7447, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 7489, + "end": 7503, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 7800, + "end": 7811, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 9110, + "end": 9117, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 9128, + "end": 9134, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 9682, + "end": 9699, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 9777, + "end": 9790, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 9910, + "end": 9916, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 9926, + "end": 9930, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 9941, + "end": 9948, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 9962, + "end": 9969, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 10185, + "end": 10195, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 10395, + "end": 10399, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 10433, + "end": 10448, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 10788, + "end": 10801, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 10992, + "end": 10999, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 11001, + "end": 11008, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 11084, + "end": 11091, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 11130, + "end": 11137, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 11255, + "end": 11262, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 11329, + "end": 11336, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 11514, + "end": 11521, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 11578, + "end": 11585, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 11676, + "end": 11685, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 11690, + "end": 11700, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 11750, + "end": 11760, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 11771, + "end": 11777, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 11787, + "end": 11791, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 12015, + "end": 12022, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 12161, + "end": 12168, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 12179, + "end": 12186, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 12202, + "end": 12209, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 12270, + "end": 12277, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 12327, + "end": 12334, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 12487, + "end": 12494, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 13399, + "end": 13406, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 13795, + "end": 13802, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 13813, + "end": 13820, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 13822, + "end": 13829, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 13926, + "end": 13933, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 13950, + "end": 13957, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 14063, + "end": 14070, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 14100, + "end": 14107, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 14166, + "end": 14173, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 14241, + "end": 14248, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 14282, + "end": 14289, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 14369, + "end": 14381, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 14436, + "end": 14443, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 14477, + "end": 14483, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 14718, + "end": 14725, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 14937, + "end": 14949, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 14988, + "end": 14995, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 15446, + "end": 15453, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 15504, + "end": 15511, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 15539, + "end": 15545, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 15825, + "end": 15832, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 15859, + "end": 15866, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 15959, + "end": 15966, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 15977, + "end": 15984, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 15986, + "end": 15993, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 16074, + "end": 16081, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 16108, + "end": 16115, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 16137, + "end": 16150, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 16320, + "end": 16327, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 16700, + "end": 16719, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 16767, + "end": 16774, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 16789, + "end": 16796, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 16853, + "end": 16864, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 16880, + "end": 16889, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 17175, + "end": 17182, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 17234, + "end": 17241, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 17873, + "end": 17887, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 18033, + "end": 18042, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 18085, + "end": 18092, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 18172, + "end": 18186, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 18188, + "end": 18201, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 18206, + "end": 18218, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 18258, + "end": 18265, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 18328, + "end": 18337, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 18504, + "end": 18511, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 19188, + "end": 19195, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 19332, + "end": 19336, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 19754, + "end": 19761, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 19998, + "end": 20004, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 20156, + "end": 20165, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 20178, + "end": 20190, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 20620, + "end": 20634, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 20735, + "end": 20748, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 20782, + "end": 20791, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 20828, + "end": 20841, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 21067, + "end": 21079, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 21177, + "end": 21190, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 21301, + "end": 21312, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 21731, + "end": 21737, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 21755, + "end": 21762, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 21776, + "end": 21783, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 22430, + "end": 22437, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 22487, + "end": 22494, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 23142, + "end": 23149, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 23240, + "end": 23247, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 23362, + "end": 23369, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 23521, + "end": 23528, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 23558, + "end": 23565, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 24347, + "end": 24367, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 25591, + "end": 25598, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 26313, + "end": 26320, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 26514, + "end": 26521, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 26551, + "end": 26558, + "label": "WIT" + }, + { + "start": 26971, + "end": 26980, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 27045, + "end": 27068, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 27246, + "end": 27263, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 27449, + "end": 27456, + "label": "JUDGE" + } + ], + "35302553": [ + { + "start": 12, + "end": 31, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 58, + "end": 73, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 86, + "end": 103, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 106, + "end": 118, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 119, + "end": 152, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 182, + "end": 193, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 226, + "end": 240, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 286, + "end": 296, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 326, + "end": 336, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 362, + "end": 371, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 379, + "end": 393, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 421, + "end": 434, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 443, + "end": 456, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 472, + "end": 485, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 551, + "end": 571, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 586, + "end": 615, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 618, + "end": 622, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 628, + "end": 658, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 733, + "end": 750, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 825, + "end": 854, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 1042, + "end": 1062, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1713, + "end": 1729, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1829, + "end": 1845, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 1867, + "end": 1885, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2173, + "end": 2188, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2335, + "end": 2361, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 2652, + "end": 2672, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 2801, + "end": 2820, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3154, + "end": 3172, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3429, + "end": 3447, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 3743, + "end": 3758, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 4566, + "end": 4584, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6875, + "end": 6878, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 6905, + "end": 6923, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 6929, + "end": 6932, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 7188, + "end": 7191, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 7354, + "end": 7357, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 7468, + "end": 7471, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 7534, + "end": 7537, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 7697, + "end": 7701, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 7792, + "end": 7796, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 8014, + "end": 8018, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 8399, + "end": 8403, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 8832, + "end": 8835, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 8866, + "end": 8870, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9007, + "end": 9011, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9316, + "end": 9320, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9440, + "end": 9451, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 9514, + "end": 9518, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 9712, + "end": 9716, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 10134, + "end": 10152, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 10296, + "end": 10299, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 10342, + "end": 10348, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 10596, + "end": 10610, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 10732, + "end": 10742, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 10894, + "end": 10911, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11296, + "end": 11301, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 11329, + "end": 11346, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 11443, + "end": 11460, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12161, + "end": 12166, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 12237, + "end": 12253, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12511, + "end": 12526, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 12788, + "end": 12803, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 13028, + "end": 13046, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 13183, + "end": 13203, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 13350, + "end": 13355, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 13385, + "end": 13405, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 13886, + "end": 13889, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 15462, + "end": 15471, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15475, + "end": 15478, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 15579, + "end": 15582, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 15852, + "end": 15866, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15967, + "end": 15981, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16384, + "end": 16404, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16705, + "end": 16719, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 17072, + "end": 17085, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 17089, + "end": 17092, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 17941, + "end": 17944, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 18208, + "end": 18218, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 18750, + "end": 18768, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 19144, + "end": 19157, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 19763, + "end": 19788, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 20504, + "end": 20522, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 22620, + "end": 22623, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 23316, + "end": 23319, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 23433, + "end": 23436, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 23455, + "end": 23478, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 23541, + "end": 23544, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 23702, + "end": 23725, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 23741, + "end": 23744, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 24079, + "end": 24089, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 24220, + "end": 24223, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 24470, + "end": 24473, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 25073, + "end": 25076, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 25859, + "end": 25862, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 25926, + "end": 25930, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 25947, + "end": 25957, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 27936, + "end": 27969, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 28267, + "end": 28284, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 29206, + "end": 29209, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 32324, + "end": 32327, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 33356, + "end": 33359, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 33372, + "end": 33376, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 33665, + "end": 33678, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 33683, + "end": 33696, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 33701, + "end": 33716, + "label": "DATE" + } + ], + "80182706": [ + { + "start": 70, + "end": 100, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 117, + "end": 143, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 145, + "end": 171, + "label": "APP" + }, + { + "start": 202, + "end": 224, + "label": "RESP" + }, + { + "start": 288, + "end": 318, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 335, + "end": 362, + "label": "CASENO" + }, + { + "start": 493, + "end": 513, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 520, + "end": 530, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 585, + "end": 595, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 633, + "end": 643, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 737, + "end": 757, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 824, + "end": 926, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1220, + "end": 1263, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1297, + "end": 1307, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1367, + "end": 1377, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 1399, + "end": 1412, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 1565, + "end": 1578, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 2992, + "end": 2995, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3028, + "end": 3031, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 3440, + "end": 3443, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 4560, + "end": 4563, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5080, + "end": 5083, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 5475, + "end": 5478, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 8665, + "end": 8696, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 9603, + "end": 9616, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 9620, + "end": 9684, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 14580, + "end": 14593, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 14597, + "end": 14608, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 15687, + "end": 15690, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 15953, + "end": 15956, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 16056, + "end": 16059, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 16351, + "end": 16369, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 16545, + "end": 16555, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 16720, + "end": 16777, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16780, + "end": 16796, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 16818, + "end": 16822, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 17434, + "end": 17457, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 17792, + "end": 17802, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18305, + "end": 18315, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 18364, + "end": 18368, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 18459, + "end": 18482, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 19108, + "end": 19112, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 19303, + "end": 19307, + "label": "A.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 19634, + "end": 19657, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 20265, + "end": 20275, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 20392, + "end": 20402, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 20423, + "end": 20433, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 20501, + "end": 20511, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 20518, + "end": 20523, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 21669, + "end": 21692, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 21850, + "end": 21863, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 22029, + "end": 22041, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 23501, + "end": 23511, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 23818, + "end": 23828, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 23848, + "end": 23860, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 24065, + "end": 24075, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 24107, + "end": 24117, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 24548, + "end": 24614, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24617, + "end": 24628, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 24801, + "end": 24868, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 24902, + "end": 24923, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 25147, + "end": 25168, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 25240, + "end": 25264, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 25551, + "end": 25574, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 26890, + "end": 26908, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 27444, + "end": 27459, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 28182, + "end": 28203, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 29076, + "end": 29097, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 29170, + "end": 29189, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 29724, + "end": 29745, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 29916, + "end": 29934, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 30023, + "end": 30046, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 30074, + "end": 30107, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 30174, + "end": 30192, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 30438, + "end": 30456, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 30989, + "end": 31013, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 32992, + "end": 33000, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 33042, + "end": 33052, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 33117, + "end": 33126, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 33414, + "end": 33437, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 33462, + "end": 33485, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 34532, + "end": 34542, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 36187, + "end": 36215, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 36380, + "end": 36389, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 38689, + "end": 38708, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 39159, + "end": 39169, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 39270, + "end": 39278, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 39345, + "end": 39353, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 39598, + "end": 39621, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 40242, + "end": 40265, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 40374, + "end": 40397, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 40762, + "end": 40771, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 40814, + "end": 40823, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 40866, + "end": 40876, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 40921, + "end": 40929, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 40941, + "end": 40964, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 41206, + "end": 41229, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 41905, + "end": 41915, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 42067, + "end": 42090, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 42134, + "end": 42157, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 42280, + "end": 42303, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 42459, + "end": 42482, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 42571, + "end": 42638, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 42724, + "end": 42732, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 42782, + "end": 42805, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 44109, + "end": 44132, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 45018, + "end": 45026, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 45068, + "end": 45092, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 45783, + "end": 45806, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 45923, + "end": 45946, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 46108, + "end": 46131, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 46283, + "end": 46306, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 46469, + "end": 46487, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 46506, + "end": 46529, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 46593, + "end": 46616, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 46625, + "end": 46643, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 46743, + "end": 46766, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 46816, + "end": 46839, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 46933, + "end": 47000, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 47061, + "end": 47071, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 48108, + "end": 48118, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 48127, + "end": 48137, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 48168, + "end": 48177, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 48186, + "end": 48195, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 49634, + "end": 49643, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 49652, + "end": 49661, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 50968, + "end": 50978, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 51063, + "end": 51072, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 51081, + "end": 51090, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 51478, + "end": 51521, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 52459, + "end": 52467, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 52476, + "end": 52484, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 52529, + "end": 52538, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 52547, + "end": 52556, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 52588, + "end": 52597, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 52606, + "end": 52615, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 53182, + "end": 53198, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 53375, + "end": 53398, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 53433, + "end": 53442, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 53451, + "end": 53460, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 54232, + "end": 54274, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 55277, + "end": 55300, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 56013, + "end": 56036, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 57039, + "end": 57062, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 57361, + "end": 57384, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 58270, + "end": 58280, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 58298, + "end": 58308, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 58480, + "end": 58522, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 59307, + "end": 59320, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 59337, + "end": 59353, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 59587, + "end": 59599, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 59739, + "end": 59762, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 59764, + "end": 59767, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 60568, + "end": 60591, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 60684, + "end": 60697, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 61166, + "end": 61253, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 61277, + "end": 61296, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 61389, + "end": 61431, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 61437, + "end": 61504, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 61513, + "end": 61532, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 61637, + "end": 61679, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 62317, + "end": 62340, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 62408, + "end": 62431, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 62558, + "end": 62581, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 62908, + "end": 62931, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 63008, + "end": 63031, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 63057, + "end": 63090, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 63117, + "end": 63135, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 63240, + "end": 63263, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 63382, + "end": 63405, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 63505, + "end": 63515, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 63538, + "end": 63561, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 63786, + "end": 63802, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 64608, + "end": 64626, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 64640, + "end": 64656, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 65036, + "end": 65059, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 65329, + "end": 65347, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 65858, + "end": 65868, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 67248, + "end": 67258, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 67314, + "end": 67326, + "label": "R.COUNSEL" + }, + { + "start": 68579, + "end": 68602, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 70903, + "end": 70926, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 72016, + "end": 72034, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 72140, + "end": 72163, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 72429, + "end": 72452, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 72749, + "end": 72772, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 72857, + "end": 72878, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 73053, + "end": 73076, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 73162, + "end": 73178, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 75396, + "end": 75406, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 76091, + "end": 76112, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 76269, + "end": 76292, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 76641, + "end": 76664, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 76742, + "end": 76763, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 76852, + "end": 76875, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 77127, + "end": 77158, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 77887, + "end": 77897, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 77933, + "end": 77957, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 78170, + "end": 78180, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 78490, + "end": 78542, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 78768, + "end": 78781, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 78929, + "end": 78971, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 78978, + "end": 78985, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 79145, + "end": 79148, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 79159, + "end": 79166, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 79216, + "end": 79223, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 80173, + "end": 80196, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 80340, + "end": 80350, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 80591, + "end": 80601, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 81748, + "end": 81758, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 81887, + "end": 81894, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 81909, + "end": 81919, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 82458, + "end": 82468, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 83200, + "end": 83210, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 83292, + "end": 83303, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 83883, + "end": 83926, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 84438, + "end": 84448, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 86341, + "end": 86384, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 87196, + "end": 87206, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 87409, + "end": 87467, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 87499, + "end": 87561, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 88914, + "end": 88978, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 89084, + "end": 89094, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 89154, + "end": 89157, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 89215, + "end": 89225, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 89250, + "end": 89260, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 89816, + "end": 89826, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 89990, + "end": 90000, + "label": "COURT" + }, + { + "start": 90193, + "end": 90201, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 90530, + "end": 90590, + "label": "PREC" + }, + { + "start": 91604, + "end": 91628, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 93097, + "end": 93107, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 93158, + "end": 93168, + "label": "DATE" + }, + { + "start": 94937, + "end": 94979, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 95019, + "end": 95062, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 96256, + "end": 96266, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 96673, + "end": 96696, + "label": "AUTH" + }, + { + "start": 96804, + "end": 96814, + "label": "STAT" + }, + { + "start": 97032, + "end": 97044, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 97062, + "end": 97073, + "label": "JUDGE" + }, + { + "start": 97086, + "end": 97102, + "label": "DATE" + } + ] + } + }, + "rr": { + "HC_Raghupati_Singhania__vs__Competition_Commission_ofDE201616051616063761COM513489": [ + "None", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "RulingByPresentCourt", + "RulingByPresentCourt" + ], + "COM_TPM_Consultants_Pvt_Ltd_vs_Competition_Commission_TA2016110716153210127COM903224": [ + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RulingByPresentCourt" + ], + "SC_Ultra Tech Cement Ltd vs Competition Commission of India and Ors 12062013 SC": [ + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Issue", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "Fact", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RulingByPresentCourt" + ], + "CCI_Ms_Mineral_Enterprises_Limited_vs_Ministry_of_RailCO120089COM803307": [ + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Issue", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RulingByPresentCourt", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent", + "Dissent" + ], + "HC_Vodafone_India_Limited_and_Ors_vs_The_Competition_MH2017051017164746274COM906883": [ + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "RulingByPresentCourt", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "PrecedentNotReliedUpon", + "PrecedentNotReliedUpon", + "PrecedentNotReliedUpon", + "PrecedentNotReliedUpon", + "PrecedentNotReliedUpon", + "PrecedentNotReliedUpon", + "PrecedentNotReliedUpon", + "PrecedentNotReliedUpon", + "PrecedentNotReliedUpon", + "PrecedentNotReliedUpon", + "PrecedentNotReliedUpon", + "PrecedentNotReliedUpon", + "PrecedentNotReliedUpon", + "PrecedentNotReliedUpon", + "PrecedentNotReliedUpon", + "PrecedentNotReliedUpon", + "PrecedentNotReliedUpon", + "PrecedentNotReliedUpon", + "PrecedentNotReliedUpon", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RulingByPresentCourt", + "RulingByPresentCourt", + "RulingByPresentCourt", + "RulingByPresentCourt", + "RulingByPresentCourt", + "RulingByPresentCourt" + ], + "SC_2009_710": [ + "None", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "Fact", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "Fact", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "Fact", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "None", + "None", + "None", + "None", + "None", + "None", + "RulingByPresentCourt", + "None", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByPresentCourt", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "Issue", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "Fact", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "Fact", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "Fact", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "Issue", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "Statute", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "Issue", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentNotReliedUpon", + "PrecedentNotReliedUpon", + "PrecedentNotReliedUpon", + "PrecedentNotReliedUpon", + "PrecedentNotReliedUpon", + "PrecedentNotReliedUpon", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "RulingByPresentCourt", + "RulingByPresentCourt", + "RulingByPresentCourt", + "None" + ], + "SC_2017_195": [ + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Issue", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "Issue", + "None", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "PrecedentNotReliedUpon", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "PrecedentNotReliedUpon", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Fact", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RulingByPresentCourt", + "RulingByPresentCourt", + "None" + ], + "BHC_BomHC_2014_498": [ + "None", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "Fact", + "Statute", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "Fact", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "Fact", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RulingByPresentCourt", + "RulingByPresentCourt", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RulingByPresentCourt", + "RulingByPresentCourt", + "RulingByPresentCourt", + "RulingByPresentCourt", + "None" + ], + "BHC_BomHC_1981_263": [ + "Issue", + "Fact", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Issue", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "Fact", + "Issue", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "RulingByLowerCourt", + "Issue", + "Statute", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "Issue", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "Statute", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RulingByPresentCourt", + "None", + "None", + "RulingByPresentCourt", + "RulingByPresentCourt", + "RulingByPresentCourt" + ], + "BHC_BomHC_1997_583": [ + "Fact", + "Issue", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "None", + "None", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "Fact", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "ArgumentPetitioner", + "None", + "None", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "None", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "RulingByPresentCourt", + "Statute", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "None", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "RulingByPresentCourt", + "Statute", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "PrecedentReliedUpon", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "Statute", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "RulingByPresentCourt", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "ArgumentRespondent", + "RulingByPresentCourt", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "Statute", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RatioOfTheDecision", + "RulingByPresentCourt", + "RulingByPresentCourt", + "None", + "RulingByPresentCourt", + "None", + "RulingByPresentCourt" + ] + }, + "cjpe": { + "prediction": { + "1986_397": "ACCEPTED", + "1977_183": "REJECTED", + "1993_98": "REJECTED", + "1991_137": "REJECTED", + "1957_125": "ACCEPTED", + "1979_438": "REJECTED", + "1982_75": "REJECTED", + "1963_101": "REJECTED", + "1983_326": "ACCEPTED", + "1957_133": "REJECTED", + "1972_106": "ACCEPTED", + "1980_59": "REJECTED", + "1967_145": "ACCEPTED", + "1971_295": "ACCEPTED", + "1968_190": "REJECTED", + "1980_192": "REJECTED", + "1984_136": "ACCEPTED", + "1986_443": "ACCEPTED", + "1975_120": "ACCEPTED", + "1986_130": "ACCEPTED", + "1964_346": "REJECTED", + "1981_232": "ACCEPTED", + "1986_176": "ACCEPTED", + "1982_71": "ACCEPTED", + "1992_592": "ACCEPTED", + "1969_435": "REJECTED", + "1968_246": "ACCEPTED", + "1986_378": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_295": "REJECTED", + "1993_34": "ACCEPTED", + "1963_61": "ACCEPTED", + "1989_81": "ACCEPTED", + "1978_390": "REJECTED", + "1979_250": "REJECTED", + "1992_179": "ACCEPTED", + "1964_115": "REJECTED", + "1971_285": "ACCEPTED", + "1984_194": "ACCEPTED", + "1967_263": "REJECTED", + "1989_215": "ACCEPTED", + "1960_201": "REJECTED", + "1989_9": "REJECTED", + "1967_285": "ACCEPTED", + "1979_428": "ACCEPTED", + "1966_71": "ACCEPTED", + "1988_291": "ACCEPTED", + "1982_89": "REJECTED", + "1992_661": "ACCEPTED", + "1971_368": "ACCEPTED", + "1960_196": "REJECTED", + "1974_36": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_213": "ACCEPTED", + "1990_226": "REJECTED", + "1972_246": "REJECTED", + "1986_212": "REJECTED", + "1954_91": "REJECTED", + "1976_94": "REJECTED", + "1980_60": "REJECTED", + "1987_20": "ACCEPTED", + "1968_60": "REJECTED", + "1962_70": "ACCEPTED", + "1983_197": "REJECTED", + "1980_419": "REJECTED", + "1980_264": "ACCEPTED", + "1993_751": "REJECTED", + "1994_632": "REJECTED", + "1960_248": "REJECTED", + "1980_105": "REJECTED", + "1964_318": "ACCEPTED", + "1992_361": "ACCEPTED", + "1982_51": "REJECTED", + "1979_237": "ACCEPTED", + "1966_0": "ACCEPTED", + "1978_403": "REJECTED", + "1971_347": "ACCEPTED", + "1983_148": "REJECTED", + "1966_7": "REJECTED", + "1992_48": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_140": "REJECTED", + "1993_339": "ACCEPTED", + "1959_55": "REJECTED", + "1981_373": "ACCEPTED", + "1959_122": "REJECTED", + "1971_614": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_47": "REJECTED", + "1953_7": "REJECTED", + "1968_356": "REJECTED", + "1995_416": "ACCEPTED", + "1961_220": "ACCEPTED", + "1980_179": "ACCEPTED", + "1967_186": "REJECTED", + "1967_43": "ACCEPTED", + "1960_186": "REJECTED", + "1965_151": "ACCEPTED", + "1966_262": "REJECTED", + "1989_19": "ACCEPTED", + "1989_269": "ACCEPTED", + "1992_297": "REJECTED", + "1967_206": "ACCEPTED", + "1993_14": "REJECTED", + "1967_174": "ACCEPTED", + "1969_389": "ACCEPTED", + "1963_198": "ACCEPTED", + "1983_149": "ACCEPTED", + "1989_57": "REJECTED", + "1993_89": "ACCEPTED", + "1972_415": "ACCEPTED", + "1959_159": "REJECTED", + "1978_99": "REJECTED", + "1984_39": "REJECTED", + "1959_98": "REJECTED", + "1977_163": "REJECTED", + "1967_155": "REJECTED", + "1977_331": "ACCEPTED", + "1964_22": "ACCEPTED", + "1973_13": "ACCEPTED", + "1967_254": "REJECTED", + "1978_332": "ACCEPTED", + "1993_344": "REJECTED", + "1963_279": "REJECTED", + "1977_337": "ACCEPTED", + "1968_274": "REJECTED", + "1972_590": "REJECTED", + "1951_35": "REJECTED", + "1980_102": "ACCEPTED", + "1986_175": "ACCEPTED", + "1988_341": "ACCEPTED", + "1953_74": "ACCEPTED", + "1975_216": "ACCEPTED", + "1969_308": "ACCEPTED", + "1980_160": "ACCEPTED", + "1985_185": "REJECTED", + "1989_365": "ACCEPTED", + "1970_20": "REJECTED", + "1970_289": "ACCEPTED", + "1982_118": "ACCEPTED", + "1954_100": "REJECTED", + "1976_15": "REJECTED", + "1962_65": "ACCEPTED", + "1991_575": "REJECTED", + "1976_406": "ACCEPTED", + "1968_199": "REJECTED", + "1969_502": "ACCEPTED", + "1982_95": "REJECTED", + "1974_204": "ACCEPTED", + "1992_766": "REJECTED", + "1963_188": "REJECTED", + "1967_173": "REJECTED", + "1978_131": "ACCEPTED", + "1978_68": "ACCEPTED", + "1974_144": "ACCEPTED", + "1959_35": "REJECTED", + "1973_372": "REJECTED", + "1985_73": "REJECTED", + "1988_103": "REJECTED", + "1977_138": "REJECTED", + "1974_345": "REJECTED", + "1973_373": "REJECTED", + "1960_100": "REJECTED", + "1975_291": "ACCEPTED", + "1972_515": "REJECTED", + "1968_129": "ACCEPTED", + "1965_121": "REJECTED", + "1988_140": "REJECTED", + "1960_72": "REJECTED", + "1968_43": "REJECTED", + "1968_84": "ACCEPTED", + "1971_577": "REJECTED", + "1978_246": "REJECTED", + "1993_112": "REJECTED", + "1962_125": "ACCEPTED", + "1964_32": "REJECTED", + "1987_414": "ACCEPTED", + "1961_5": "ACCEPTED", + "1979_419": "ACCEPTED", + "1957_70": "REJECTED", + "1986_135": "ACCEPTED", + "1976_444": "REJECTED", + "1982_3": "REJECTED", + "1975_206": "REJECTED", + "1977_245": "ACCEPTED", + "1992_30": "ACCEPTED", + "1976_148": "ACCEPTED", + "1995_419": "ACCEPTED", + "1968_336": "REJECTED", + "1972_364": "REJECTED", + "1955_9": "ACCEPTED", + "1974_147": "REJECTED", + "1963_35": "REJECTED", + "1984_103": "REJECTED", + "1993_217": "REJECTED", + "1962_151": "REJECTED", + "1965_335": "REJECTED", + "1993_754": "ACCEPTED", + "1957_65": "ACCEPTED", + "1967_225": "REJECTED", + "1983_254": "ACCEPTED", + "1960_125": "ACCEPTED", + "1986_98": "REJECTED", + "1967_346": "ACCEPTED", + "1980_217": "ACCEPTED", + "1969_466": "REJECTED", + "1963_128": "REJECTED", + "1986_72": "REJECTED", + "1962_378": "ACCEPTED", + "1979_219": "REJECTED", + "1970_9": "REJECTED", + "1976_103": "REJECTED", + "1986_246": "ACCEPTED", + "1975_215": "ACCEPTED", + "1977_273": "ACCEPTED", + "1974_308": "ACCEPTED", + "1959_116": "REJECTED", + "1977_333": "REJECTED", + "1968_27": "REJECTED", + "1963_32": "REJECTED", + "1966_283": "ACCEPTED", + "1960_199": "REJECTED", + "1968_139": "ACCEPTED", + "1976_447": "REJECTED", + "1981_121": "ACCEPTED", + "1976_89": "REJECTED", + "1982_29": "ACCEPTED", + "1987_454": "REJECTED", + "1962_354": "REJECTED", + "1966_188": "REJECTED", + "1958_175": "REJECTED", + "1964_111": "REJECTED", + "1964_102": "REJECTED", + "1954_26": "REJECTED", + "1970_30": "ACCEPTED", + "1971_134": "REJECTED", + "1976_436": "REJECTED", + "1969_274": "ACCEPTED", + "1981_32": "ACCEPTED", + "1978_163": "ACCEPTED", + "1997_996": "REJECTED", + "1985_129": "ACCEPTED", + "1981_55": "ACCEPTED", + "1980_133": "ACCEPTED", + "1959_202": "ACCEPTED", + "1988_147": "REJECTED", + "1979_281": "ACCEPTED", + "1993_164": "ACCEPTED", + "1977_260": "ACCEPTED", + "1961_251": "ACCEPTED", + "1969_378": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_340": "REJECTED", + "1964_286": "ACCEPTED", + "1963_99": "ACCEPTED", + "1984_140": "ACCEPTED", + "1963_37": "ACCEPTED", + "1966_275": "ACCEPTED", + "1987_408": "REJECTED", + "1959_1": "REJECTED", + "1962_122": "ACCEPTED", + "1965_174": "ACCEPTED", + "1968_256": "ACCEPTED", + "1992_758": "ACCEPTED", + "1961_160": "REJECTED", + "1951_33": "REJECTED", + "1974_136": "ACCEPTED", + "1984_289": "REJECTED", + "1985_76": "ACCEPTED", + "1993_935": "REJECTED", + "1952_42": "REJECTED", + "1993_182": "ACCEPTED", + "1978_120": "REJECTED", + "1960_214": "REJECTED", + "1979_106": "REJECTED", + "1959_224": "REJECTED", + "1958_165": "REJECTED", + "1972_130": "ACCEPTED", + "1990_708": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_175": "REJECTED", + "1969_35": "REJECTED", + "1960_86": "ACCEPTED", + "1987_607": "ACCEPTED", + "1960_251": "REJECTED", + "1976_105": "REJECTED", + "1986_19": "ACCEPTED", + "1992_84": "ACCEPTED", + "1963_60": "ACCEPTED", + "1981_385": "REJECTED", + "1969_27": "REJECTED", + "1969_244": "ACCEPTED", + "1986_102": "REJECTED", + "1987_448": "REJECTED", + "1961_248": "ACCEPTED", + "1957_144": "REJECTED", + "1972_369": "ACCEPTED", + "1972_405": "ACCEPTED", + "1953_26": "ACCEPTED", + "1976_446": "REJECTED", + "1971_441": "ACCEPTED", + "1992_138": "REJECTED", + "1980_222": "ACCEPTED", + "1972_110": "REJECTED", + "1969_329": "REJECTED", + "1965_172": "REJECTED", + "1975_19": "ACCEPTED", + "1989_10": "REJECTED", + "1992_286": "ACCEPTED", + "1993_152": "REJECTED", + "1980_138": "ACCEPTED", + "1984_67": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_332": "REJECTED", + "1980_349": "ACCEPTED", + "1983_236": "REJECTED", + "1990_596": "REJECTED", + "1977_262": "REJECTED", + "1965_236": "ACCEPTED", + "1968_297": "REJECTED", + "1960_82": "REJECTED", + "1993_372": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_128": "REJECTED", + "1975_204": "ACCEPTED", + "1986_393": "REJECTED", + "1978_130": "REJECTED", + "1961_384": "ACCEPTED", + "1972_544": "REJECTED", + "1988_13": "ACCEPTED", + "1986_209": "ACCEPTED", + "1970_35": "ACCEPTED", + "1968_6": "ACCEPTED", + "1987_463": "ACCEPTED", + "1967_116": "REJECTED", + "1988_488": "REJECTED", + "1976_282": "REJECTED", + "1972_388": "ACCEPTED", + "1984_249": "ACCEPTED", + "1999_721": "ACCEPTED", + "1973_415": "REJECTED", + "1989_369": "ACCEPTED", + "1975_115": "ACCEPTED", + "1991_468": "REJECTED", + "1969_188": "ACCEPTED", + "1960_341": "REJECTED", + "1964_30": "REJECTED", + "1990_324": "ACCEPTED", + "1963_270": "REJECTED", + "2001_685": "REJECTED", + "1961_81": "REJECTED", + "1958_99": "REJECTED", + "1990_52": "REJECTED", + "1978_38": "REJECTED", + "1954_25": "ACCEPTED", + "1976_179": "ACCEPTED", + "1988_66": "REJECTED", + "1967_167": "REJECTED", + "1956_23": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_251": "ACCEPTED", + "1983_38": "REJECTED", + "1995_412": "ACCEPTED", + "1967_351": "ACCEPTED", + "1975_223": "REJECTED", + "1993_22": "ACCEPTED", + "1961_19": "REJECTED", + "1980_365": "ACCEPTED", + "1970_338": "REJECTED", + "1976_144": "ACCEPTED", + "1991_13": "ACCEPTED", + "1966_276": "REJECTED", + "1980_305": "ACCEPTED", + "1976_285": "REJECTED", + "1988_396": "ACCEPTED", + "1958_9": "REJECTED", + "1989_72": "REJECTED", + "1977_323": "ACCEPTED", + "1959_5": "REJECTED", + "1977_151": "ACCEPTED", + "1960_212": "ACCEPTED", + "1975_1": "ACCEPTED", + "1983_151": "REJECTED", + "1977_238": "REJECTED", + "1989_214": "ACCEPTED", + "1978_383": "ACCEPTED", + "1972_438": "ACCEPTED", + "1968_59": "ACCEPTED", + "1984_305": "REJECTED", + "1982_194": "REJECTED", + "1992_706": "ACCEPTED", + "1957_11": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_167": "REJECTED", + "1981_351": "ACCEPTED", + "1974_207": "ACCEPTED", + "1984_104": "ACCEPTED", + "1951_30": "ACCEPTED", + "1961_139": "REJECTED", + "1984_306": "ACCEPTED", + "1978_33": "ACCEPTED", + "2003_720": "ACCEPTED", + "1983_4": "ACCEPTED", + "1981_45": "ACCEPTED", + "1965_84": "REJECTED", + "1975_388": "REJECTED", + "1978_262": "REJECTED", + "1976_131": "REJECTED", + "1969_197": "ACCEPTED", + "1978_25": "ACCEPTED", + "1974_116": "ACCEPTED", + "1965_238": "REJECTED", + "1973_315": "REJECTED", + "1961_45": "REJECTED", + "1986_245": "REJECTED", + "1954_149": "ACCEPTED", + "1965_105": "ACCEPTED", + "1974_165": "REJECTED", + "1992_714": "ACCEPTED", + "1978_147": "REJECTED", + "1962_190": "REJECTED", + "1984_138": "REJECTED", + "2008_516": "ACCEPTED", + "1961_327": "REJECTED", + "1985_77": "REJECTED", + "1983_64": "REJECTED", + "1984_284": "ACCEPTED", + "1986_75": "ACCEPTED", + "1983_142": "ACCEPTED", + "1995_403": "REJECTED", + "1989_250": "ACCEPTED", + "1991_92": "ACCEPTED", + "1978_53": "ACCEPTED", + "1974_362": "ACCEPTED", + "1982_122": "ACCEPTED", + "1961_274": "REJECTED", + "1988_134": "ACCEPTED", + "1981_93": "ACCEPTED", + "1970_179": "ACCEPTED", + "1978_394": "ACCEPTED", + "1961_382": "ACCEPTED", + "1993_785": "ACCEPTED", + "1983_165": "ACCEPTED", + "1993_185": "ACCEPTED", + "1958_170": "ACCEPTED", + "1986_183": "REJECTED", + "1962_220": "REJECTED", + "1968_286": "ACCEPTED", + "1964_220": "REJECTED", + "1977_348": "REJECTED", + "1961_250": "REJECTED", + "1972_320": "REJECTED", + "1966_198": "ACCEPTED", + "1985_3": "ACCEPTED", + "1984_179": "REJECTED", + "1961_341": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_349": "REJECTED", + "1969_508": "REJECTED", + "1970_177": "ACCEPTED", + "1950_14": "REJECTED", + "1961_163": "REJECTED", + "1958_153": "REJECTED", + "1995_425": "ACCEPTED", + "1979_359": "REJECTED", + "1977_99": "ACCEPTED", + "1973_212": "ACCEPTED", + "1973_205": "REJECTED", + "1987_435": "ACCEPTED", + "1985_313": "ACCEPTED", + "1973_142": "ACCEPTED", + "1964_254": "ACCEPTED", + "1982_53": "ACCEPTED", + "1967_260": "ACCEPTED", + "1971_147": "REJECTED", + "1975_11": "ACCEPTED", + "1979_342": "REJECTED", + "1964_209": "REJECTED", + "1957_67": "ACCEPTED", + "1978_7": "REJECTED", + "1988_507": "REJECTED", + "1978_248": "ACCEPTED", + "1985_240": "ACCEPTED", + "1983_320": "REJECTED", + "1990_53": "REJECTED", + "1978_93": "REJECTED", + "1967_33": "REJECTED", + "1960_171": "ACCEPTED", + "1991_96": "REJECTED", + "1959_29": "REJECTED", + "1985_126": "ACCEPTED", + "1958_86": "ACCEPTED", + "1972_4": "ACCEPTED", + "1995_708": "ACCEPTED", + "1969_13": "ACCEPTED", + "1959_87": "ACCEPTED", + "1967_270": "ACCEPTED", + "1984_111": "ACCEPTED", + "1977_160": "ACCEPTED", + "1992_622": "ACCEPTED", + "1975_464": "REJECTED", + "1973_152": "ACCEPTED", + "1979_329": "REJECTED", + "1991_530": "REJECTED", + "1989_188": "REJECTED", + "1989_221": "ACCEPTED", + "1985_322": "ACCEPTED", + "1982_174": "ACCEPTED", + "1965_143": "REJECTED", + "1969_212": "ACCEPTED", + "1963_142": "ACCEPTED", + "1982_41": "ACCEPTED", + "1959_197": "ACCEPTED", + "1966_123": "ACCEPTED", + "1991_128": "ACCEPTED", + "1964_92": "ACCEPTED", + "1976_41": "REJECTED", + "1979_145": "ACCEPTED", + "1959_8": "REJECTED", + "1961_133": "ACCEPTED", + "1964_183": "REJECTED", + "1991_313": "REJECTED", + "1965_291": "REJECTED", + "1986_200": "ACCEPTED", + "1971_400": "REJECTED", + "1978_59": "REJECTED", + "1966_304": "ACCEPTED", + "1970_180": "ACCEPTED", + "1961_111": "REJECTED", + "1968_7": "REJECTED", + "1976_133": "REJECTED", + "1960_193": "REJECTED", + "1972_607": "REJECTED", + "1989_346": "ACCEPTED", + "1979_256": "REJECTED", + "1988_367": "REJECTED", + "1989_258": "REJECTED", + "1988_175": "REJECTED", + "1962_154": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_404": "REJECTED", + "1979_263": "REJECTED", + "1961_300": "REJECTED", + "1964_122": "REJECTED", + "1958_98": "REJECTED", + "2008_2035": "ACCEPTED", + "1971_499": "ACCEPTED", + "1965_323": "REJECTED", + "1957_24": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_305": "REJECTED", + "1973_9": "ACCEPTED", + "1980_35": "ACCEPTED", + "1973_239": "REJECTED", + "2008_2083": "ACCEPTED", + "1979_348": "REJECTED", + "1977_286": "ACCEPTED", + "1958_162": "REJECTED", + "1966_205": "ACCEPTED", + "1987_437": "REJECTED", + "1972_555": "ACCEPTED", + "1973_60": "ACCEPTED", + "1987_362": "ACCEPTED", + "1972_146": "ACCEPTED", + "1963_257": "REJECTED", + "1977_144": "REJECTED", + "1980_76": "ACCEPTED", + "1980_283": "REJECTED", + "1975_163": "REJECTED", + "1995_660": "REJECTED", + "1967_156": "REJECTED", + "1971_105": "REJECTED", + "1978_296": "REJECTED", + "1981_208": "ACCEPTED", + "1980_156": "ACCEPTED", + "1977_309": "REJECTED", + "1961_320": "REJECTED", + "1980_376": "ACCEPTED", + "1977_98": "ACCEPTED", + "1972_307": "REJECTED", + "1990_605": "REJECTED", + "1966_24": "REJECTED", + "1975_197": "REJECTED", + "1984_117": "REJECTED", + "1992_82": "ACCEPTED", + "1975_117": "REJECTED", + "1978_345": "ACCEPTED", + "1968_252": "REJECTED", + "1986_182": "REJECTED", + "1986_150": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_373": "REJECTED", + "1985_259": "REJECTED", + "1962_169": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_103": "REJECTED", + "1965_73": "REJECTED", + "1972_344": "REJECTED", + "1978_299": "ACCEPTED", + "1979_410": "ACCEPTED", + "1961_286": "ACCEPTED", + "1967_353": "ACCEPTED", + "1983_251": "REJECTED", + "1964_201": "REJECTED", + "1959_13": "ACCEPTED", + "1984_290": "REJECTED", + "1964_46": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_433": "ACCEPTED", + "1983_3": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_118": "REJECTED", + "1966_225": "REJECTED", + "1965_380": "REJECTED", + "1963_235": "REJECTED", + "1957_113": "REJECTED", + "1984_257": "REJECTED", + "1957_124": "ACCEPTED", + "1978_337": "ACCEPTED", + "1989_136": "ACCEPTED", + "1965_372": "REJECTED", + "1976_141": "ACCEPTED", + "1972_375": "ACCEPTED", + "1959_41": "REJECTED", + "1970_36": "REJECTED", + "1986_368": "REJECTED", + "1966_106": "REJECTED", + "1972_480": "REJECTED", + "1988_487": "ACCEPTED", + "1966_285": "REJECTED", + "1971_123": "ACCEPTED", + "1955_102": "REJECTED", + "1992_198": "ACCEPTED", + "1960_143": "ACCEPTED", + "1988_386": "ACCEPTED", + "1984_68": "ACCEPTED", + "1988_516": "ACCEPTED", + "1975_171": "ACCEPTED", + "1981_399": "ACCEPTED", + "1979_286": "REJECTED", + "1963_267": "ACCEPTED", + "1993_69": "ACCEPTED", + "1954_109": "ACCEPTED", + "1965_189": "REJECTED", + "1972_27": "ACCEPTED", + "1969_133": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_112": "REJECTED", + "1971_284": "REJECTED", + "1966_61": "ACCEPTED", + "1980_159": "ACCEPTED", + "1960_99": "ACCEPTED", + "1973_72": "ACCEPTED", + "1983_210": "ACCEPTED", + "1985_133": "REJECTED", + "1976_66": "REJECTED", + "1979_442": "ACCEPTED", + "1984_239": "REJECTED", + "1970_82": "REJECTED", + "1993_90": "REJECTED", + "1991_510": "REJECTED", + "1959_155": "ACCEPTED", + "1967_109": "ACCEPTED", + "1961_134": "ACCEPTED", + "1964_281": "REJECTED", + "1989_483": "REJECTED", + "1960_42": "REJECTED", + "1952_98": "REJECTED", + "1975_367": "REJECTED", + "1971_492": "REJECTED", + "1975_137": "REJECTED", + "1975_527": "ACCEPTED", + "1988_374": "REJECTED", + "1957_148": "REJECTED", + "1963_75": "ACCEPTED", + "1974_219": "REJECTED", + "1967_243": "REJECTED", + "1985_174": "ACCEPTED", + "1991_146": "REJECTED", + "1973_209": "REJECTED", + "1985_298": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_334": "REJECTED", + "1983_214": "ACCEPTED", + "1978_200": "REJECTED", + "1968_118": "REJECTED", + "1966_117": "ACCEPTED", + "1952_60": "ACCEPTED", + "1992_208": "REJECTED", + "1978_243": "ACCEPTED", + "1988_481": "REJECTED", + "1970_67": "REJECTED", + "1975_175": "REJECTED", + "2006_343": "ACCEPTED", + "1981_280": "REJECTED", + "1981_46": "ACCEPTED", + "1965_334": "REJECTED", + "2002_171": "ACCEPTED", + "1966_216": "REJECTED", + "1962_396": "REJECTED", + "1971_609": "ACCEPTED", + "1989_367": "ACCEPTED", + "1963_201": "ACCEPTED", + "1964_97": "REJECTED", + "1972_426": "ACCEPTED", + "1986_211": "ACCEPTED", + "1963_163": "ACCEPTED", + "1988_190": "ACCEPTED", + "1974_201": "REJECTED", + "1997_792": "ACCEPTED", + "1957_149": "ACCEPTED", + "1972_591": "ACCEPTED", + "1984_187": "REJECTED", + "1992_134": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_107": "REJECTED", + "1975_409": "ACCEPTED", + "1971_635": "ACCEPTED", + "1986_64": "ACCEPTED", + "1969_150": "REJECTED", + "1985_263": "ACCEPTED", + "1951_40": "ACCEPTED", + "1988_183": "ACCEPTED", + "1964_64": "ACCEPTED", + "1980_401": "REJECTED", + "1974_436": "ACCEPTED", + "1984_346": "ACCEPTED", + "1964_208": "REJECTED", + "1959_26": "REJECTED", + "1976_196": "REJECTED", + "1975_283": "ACCEPTED", + "1980_148": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_129": "REJECTED", + "1990_411": "ACCEPTED", + "1961_363": "REJECTED", + "1961_158": "REJECTED", + "1969_243": "REJECTED", + "1968_3": "REJECTED", + "1975_84": "ACCEPTED", + "1975_315": "REJECTED", + "1985_211": "ACCEPTED", + "1960_288": "REJECTED", + "1967_62": "REJECTED", + "1995_375": "ACCEPTED", + "1973_104": "ACCEPTED", + "1969_310": "ACCEPTED", + "1992_14": "ACCEPTED", + "1973_37": "REJECTED", + "1965_177": "ACCEPTED", + "1967_199": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_374": "ACCEPTED", + "1965_36": "REJECTED", + "1993_334": "ACCEPTED", + "1971_462": "ACCEPTED", + "1991_469": "ACCEPTED", + "1991_135": "ACCEPTED", + "1987_322": "ACCEPTED", + "1974_310": "REJECTED", + "1976_93": "ACCEPTED", + "1984_205": "ACCEPTED", + "1988_61": "REJECTED", + "1961_210": "REJECTED", + "1976_468": "REJECTED", + "1983_330": "REJECTED", + "1988_96": "REJECTED", + "1985_260": "REJECTED", + "1992_459": "ACCEPTED", + "1961_302": "ACCEPTED", + "1980_253": "REJECTED", + "1972_86": "REJECTED", + "1976_183": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_344": "REJECTED", + "1954_144": "REJECTED", + "1978_72": "ACCEPTED", + "1989_177": "REJECTED", + "1968_137": "ACCEPTED", + "1991_74": "REJECTED", + "1976_169": "ACCEPTED", + "1969_102": "REJECTED", + "1978_126": "ACCEPTED", + "1991_506": "REJECTED", + "1959_106": "ACCEPTED", + "1993_340": "ACCEPTED", + "1965_278": "REJECTED", + "1988_479": "ACCEPTED", + "1964_20": "ACCEPTED", + "1992_251": "REJECTED", + "1972_287": "ACCEPTED", + "1986_346": "ACCEPTED", + "1968_160": "REJECTED", + "1972_90": "REJECTED", + "1990_256": "ACCEPTED", + "1974_321": "ACCEPTED", + "1988_192": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_67": "ACCEPTED", + "1975_323": "ACCEPTED", + "1977_100": "REJECTED", + "1968_357": "REJECTED", + "1965_314": "REJECTED", + "1953_92": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_170": "REJECTED", + "1991_567": "REJECTED", + "1989_343": "ACCEPTED", + "1968_30": "REJECTED", + "1983_303": "ACCEPTED", + "1988_414": "REJECTED", + "1983_356": "ACCEPTED", + "1991_5": "ACCEPTED", + "1988_88": "REJECTED", + "1993_70": "ACCEPTED", + "1989_150": "REJECTED", + "1951_64": "ACCEPTED", + "1961_170": "REJECTED", + "1960_76": "REJECTED", + "1961_264": "REJECTED", + "1973_100": "REJECTED", + "1975_239": "ACCEPTED", + "1964_272": "REJECTED", + "1983_67": "ACCEPTED", + "1979_152": "ACCEPTED", + "1974_403": "ACCEPTED", + "1988_196": "REJECTED", + "1973_29": "REJECTED", + "1963_299": "REJECTED", + "1962_368": "REJECTED", + "1978_136": "ACCEPTED", + "1971_243": "REJECTED", + "1980_251": "REJECTED", + "1983_92": "ACCEPTED", + "1957_7": "REJECTED", + "1966_309": "ACCEPTED", + "1973_279": "REJECTED", + "1982_77": "REJECTED", + "1964_27": "REJECTED", + "1968_301": "ACCEPTED", + "1978_177": "ACCEPTED", + "1976_381": "REJECTED", + "1992_659": "REJECTED", + "1985_328": "ACCEPTED", + "1975_284": "ACCEPTED", + "1988_461": "REJECTED", + "1961_368": "REJECTED", + "1959_85": "REJECTED", + "1971_54": "ACCEPTED", + "1960_141": "REJECTED", + "1986_62": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_201": "REJECTED", + "1975_260": "REJECTED", + "1979_255": "ACCEPTED", + "1965_110": "ACCEPTED", + "1991_78": "ACCEPTED", + "1977_322": "REJECTED", + "1962_267": "REJECTED", + "1969_128": "REJECTED", + "1988_51": "ACCEPTED", + "1979_424": "ACCEPTED", + "1967_90": "REJECTED", + "1978_51": "ACCEPTED", + "1973_219": "ACCEPTED", + "1961_21": "REJECTED", + "1973_33": "ACCEPTED", + "1960_12": "ACCEPTED", + "1983_157": "REJECTED", + "1987_440": "REJECTED", + "1956_26": "REJECTED", + "1962_317": "ACCEPTED", + "1978_20": "REJECTED", + "1984_331": "ACCEPTED", + "1966_92": "ACCEPTED", + "1993_82": "ACCEPTED", + "1954_0": "REJECTED", + "1987_418": "ACCEPTED", + "1958_12": "REJECTED", + "1954_38": "ACCEPTED", + "1979_151": "REJECTED", + "1983_313": "REJECTED", + "1983_127": "REJECTED", + "1969_142": "ACCEPTED", + "1971_119": "ACCEPTED", + "1979_451": "REJECTED", + "1980_136": "ACCEPTED", + "2002_944": "REJECTED", + "1980_211": "ACCEPTED", + "1966_93": "REJECTED", + "1995_623": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_408": "REJECTED", + "1967_187": "ACCEPTED", + "1985_44": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_114": "REJECTED", + "1965_360": "ACCEPTED", + "1961_344": "REJECTED", + "1966_247": "ACCEPTED", + "1973_78": "ACCEPTED", + "1992_759": "ACCEPTED", + "1969_529": "REJECTED", + "1973_114": "REJECTED", + "1960_340": "REJECTED", + "1964_14": "ACCEPTED", + "1963_36": "REJECTED", + "1959_138": "REJECTED", + "1987_327": "REJECTED", + "1976_371": "REJECTED", + "1969_69": "REJECTED", + "1958_26": "REJECTED", + "1980_420": "REJECTED", + "1959_76": "REJECTED", + "1988_417": "ACCEPTED", + "1975_414": "REJECTED", + "1991_70": "REJECTED", + "1985_327": "REJECTED", + "1980_1": "REJECTED", + "1993_797": "ACCEPTED", + "1961_82": "ACCEPTED", + "1977_13": "ACCEPTED", + "1960_327": "ACCEPTED", + "1966_20": "REJECTED", + "1981_154": "REJECTED", + "1975_181": "REJECTED", + "1964_302": "ACCEPTED", + "1977_296": "ACCEPTED", + "1988_20": "ACCEPTED", + "1961_156": "REJECTED", + "1987_436": "REJECTED", + "1951_36": "REJECTED", + "1956_20": "REJECTED", + "1988_29": "ACCEPTED", + "1961_357": "REJECTED", + "1971_346": "ACCEPTED", + "1961_218": "REJECTED", + "1987_579": "ACCEPTED", + "1974_45": "REJECTED", + "1992_508": "ACCEPTED", + "1961_171": "REJECTED", + "1985_96": "REJECTED", + "1990_693": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_367": "REJECTED", + "1965_79": "REJECTED", + "1990_115": "REJECTED", + "1983_252": "ACCEPTED", + "1980_89": "ACCEPTED", + "1990_124": "REJECTED", + "1965_170": "REJECTED", + "1968_145": "ACCEPTED", + "1961_62": "ACCEPTED", + "1978_401": "REJECTED", + "1986_121": "ACCEPTED", + "1966_90": "REJECTED", + "1984_5": "ACCEPTED", + "1972_418": "REJECTED", + "1957_27": "REJECTED", + "1973_322": "REJECTED", + "1959_190": "REJECTED", + "1961_155": "REJECTED", + "1974_259": "REJECTED", + "1970_240": "REJECTED", + "1970_84": "REJECTED", + "1954_114": "REJECTED", + "1971_565": "REJECTED", + "1983_108": "ACCEPTED", + "1960_58": "ACCEPTED", + "1968_182": "REJECTED", + "1971_504": "ACCEPTED", + "1990_634": "REJECTED", + "1957_37": "ACCEPTED", + "1973_110": "REJECTED", + "1964_253": "REJECTED", + "1968_198": "ACCEPTED", + "2001_414": "ACCEPTED", + "1961_231": "ACCEPTED", + "1979_128": "ACCEPTED", + "1963_156": "REJECTED", + "1962_93": "ACCEPTED", + "1995_1060": "ACCEPTED", + "1954_73": "ACCEPTED", + "1954_50": "ACCEPTED", + "1969_186": "ACCEPTED", + "1959_66": "ACCEPTED", + "1972_488": "REJECTED", + "1964_43": "REJECTED", + "1967_191": "REJECTED", + "1980_43": "ACCEPTED", + "1979_1": "ACCEPTED", + "1990_18": "ACCEPTED", + "1985_123": "ACCEPTED", + "1966_229": "REJECTED", + "1988_11": "REJECTED", + "1976_369": "ACCEPTED", + "1975_352": "REJECTED", + "1987_430": "ACCEPTED", + "1986_172": "REJECTED", + "1961_124": "REJECTED", + "1962_418": "REJECTED", + "1988_256": "ACCEPTED", + "1977_310": "REJECTED", + "1977_157": "REJECTED", + "1958_116": "REJECTED", + "1988_440": "ACCEPTED", + "1981_187": "ACCEPTED", + "1975_344": "REJECTED", + "1987_447": "ACCEPTED", + "1992_156": "ACCEPTED", + "1981_95": "REJECTED", + "1975_109": "REJECTED", + "1983_112": "REJECTED", + "1967_66": "REJECTED", + "1975_411": "REJECTED", + "1965_228": "REJECTED", + "1960_10": "ACCEPTED", + "1961_212": "ACCEPTED", + "1953_39": "REJECTED", + "1977_21": "ACCEPTED", + "1991_53": "ACCEPTED", + "1974_239": "REJECTED", + "1962_105": "REJECTED", + "1967_342": "REJECTED", + "1985_360": "REJECTED", + "1960_120": "ACCEPTED", + "1981_235": "REJECTED", + "1969_349": "REJECTED", + "1973_294": "ACCEPTED", + "1977_334": "ACCEPTED", + "1958_7": "REJECTED", + "1976_173": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_210": "ACCEPTED", + "1970_122": "REJECTED", + "1960_11": "REJECTED", + "1961_30": "REJECTED", + "1966_8": "REJECTED", + "1990_704": "REJECTED", + "1973_340": "ACCEPTED", + "1975_347": "ACCEPTED", + "1987_346": "REJECTED", + "1987_563": "REJECTED", + "1968_121": "REJECTED", + "1963_152": "REJECTED", + "1969_449": "ACCEPTED", + "1968_229": "REJECTED", + "1986_379": "REJECTED", + "1963_122": "ACCEPTED", + "1959_195": "ACCEPTED", + "1992_342": "ACCEPTED", + "1978_117": "REJECTED", + "1974_368": "REJECTED", + "1985_316": "ACCEPTED", + "1967_84": "ACCEPTED", + "1964_280": "REJECTED", + "1965_48": "ACCEPTED", + "1995_322": "REJECTED", + "1990_327": "ACCEPTED", + "1957_22": "ACCEPTED", + "1964_342": "ACCEPTED", + "1969_253": "ACCEPTED", + "1964_213": "REJECTED", + "1989_286": "ACCEPTED", + "1980_277": "ACCEPTED", + "1987_389": "REJECTED", + "1953_111": "ACCEPTED", + "1965_295": "REJECTED", + "1972_182": "REJECTED", + "1958_94": "REJECTED", + "1980_134": "ACCEPTED", + "1957_43": "REJECTED", + "1967_25": "ACCEPTED", + "1991_136": "ACCEPTED", + "1977_278": "ACCEPTED", + "1974_79": "ACCEPTED", + "1966_40": "REJECTED", + "1992_165": "ACCEPTED", + "1992_221": "ACCEPTED", + "1983_17": "ACCEPTED", + "1983_215": "REJECTED", + "1967_97": "REJECTED", + "1983_288": "ACCEPTED", + "1963_81": "ACCEPTED", + "1989_492": "ACCEPTED", + "1985_110": "REJECTED", + "1954_148": "REJECTED", + "1974_75": "ACCEPTED", + "1965_180": "ACCEPTED", + "1981_332": "ACCEPTED", + "1950_23": "REJECTED", + "1983_102": "REJECTED", + "1959_199": "ACCEPTED", + "1963_192": "REJECTED", + "1969_490": "REJECTED", + "1965_147": "REJECTED", + "1988_465": "REJECTED", + "1950_38": "REJECTED", + "1959_212": "ACCEPTED", + "1967_281": "REJECTED", + "1991_486": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_186": "ACCEPTED", + "1959_153": "ACCEPTED", + "1979_241": "REJECTED", + "1973_7": "REJECTED", + "1963_184": "REJECTED", + "1978_342": "ACCEPTED", + "1965_241": "ACCEPTED", + "1969_419": "REJECTED", + "1986_163": "REJECTED", + "1970_113": "REJECTED", + "1982_27": "REJECTED", + "1971_490": "REJECTED", + "1958_8": "REJECTED", + "1970_129": "REJECTED", + "1985_40": "ACCEPTED", + "1986_78": "ACCEPTED", + "1960_224": "ACCEPTED", + "1983_235": "REJECTED", + "1961_365": "REJECTED", + "1977_272": "ACCEPTED", + "1984_135": "ACCEPTED", + "1980_27": "ACCEPTED", + "1961_114": "ACCEPTED", + "1983_139": "ACCEPTED", + "1958_6": "ACCEPTED", + "1977_325": "ACCEPTED", + "1985_99": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_207": "ACCEPTED", + "1979_346": "REJECTED", + "1975_281": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_333": "REJECTED", + "1960_27": "ACCEPTED", + "1969_341": "ACCEPTED", + "1960_297": "REJECTED", + "1974_109": "REJECTED", + "1971_399": "ACCEPTED", + "1967_59": "ACCEPTED", + "1976_170": "REJECTED", + "1963_168": "REJECTED", + "1986_450": "ACCEPTED", + "1967_314": "REJECTED", + "1968_226": "REJECTED", + "1966_178": "ACCEPTED", + "1958_52": "ACCEPTED", + "1989_129": "REJECTED", + "1985_214": "ACCEPTED", + "1986_117": "REJECTED", + "1973_262": "ACCEPTED", + "1983_137": "ACCEPTED", + "1960_318": "ACCEPTED", + "1971_303": "REJECTED", + "1975_302": "ACCEPTED", + "1961_293": "REJECTED", + "1964_313": "REJECTED", + "1984_89": "ACCEPTED", + "1968_213": "ACCEPTED", + "1967_196": "REJECTED", + "1990_344": "REJECTED", + "1961_347": "REJECTED", + "1961_391": "REJECTED", + "1961_309": "ACCEPTED", + "1982_52": "ACCEPTED", + "1963_38": "ACCEPTED", + "1957_126": "ACCEPTED", + "1993_42": "REJECTED", + "1964_248": "REJECTED", + "1973_28": "REJECTED", + "1961_72": "ACCEPTED", + "1965_166": "ACCEPTED", + "1960_164": "REJECTED", + "1965_52": "REJECTED", + "1958_160": "ACCEPTED", + "1976_168": "REJECTED", + "1962_205": "ACCEPTED", + "1967_362": "ACCEPTED", + "1961_16": "REJECTED", + "1976_176": "ACCEPTED", + "1963_231": "REJECTED", + "1965_32": "REJECTED", + "1987_565": "REJECTED", + "1954_54": "REJECTED", + "1964_321": "ACCEPTED", + "1976_417": "ACCEPTED", + "1978_214": "ACCEPTED", + "1961_434": "REJECTED", + "1985_265": "REJECTED", + "1984_51": "REJECTED", + "1961_47": "REJECTED", + "1974_399": "REJECTED", + "1991_251": "ACCEPTED", + "1967_359": "REJECTED", + "1962_135": "ACCEPTED", + "1966_182": "REJECTED", + "1989_11": "ACCEPTED", + "1988_388": "ACCEPTED", + "1987_328": "REJECTED", + "1966_85": "REJECTED", + "1969_79": "REJECTED", + "1975_429": "REJECTED", + "1966_220": "REJECTED", + "1968_207": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_80": "REJECTED", + "1960_204": "REJECTED", + "1971_507": "REJECTED", + "1969_242": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_339": "ACCEPTED", + "1980_363": "REJECTED", + "1974_338": "ACCEPTED", + "1967_305": "REJECTED", + "1960_103": "ACCEPTED", + "1983_389": "ACCEPTED", + "1988_182": "ACCEPTED", + "1965_359": "REJECTED", + "1968_247": "ACCEPTED", + "1966_128": "ACCEPTED", + "1972_379": "ACCEPTED", + "1982_171": "REJECTED", + "1982_28": "ACCEPTED", + "1967_335": "ACCEPTED", + "1983_206": "ACCEPTED", + "1961_400": "REJECTED", + "1985_278": "ACCEPTED", + "1984_44": "ACCEPTED", + "1975_210": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_32": "REJECTED", + "1985_151": "ACCEPTED", + "1984_143": "ACCEPTED", + "1975_484": "REJECTED", + "1965_301": "REJECTED", + "1979_315": "REJECTED", + "1967_81": "REJECTED", + "1984_105": "REJECTED", + "1968_293": "ACCEPTED", + "1972_195": "REJECTED", + "1988_522": "ACCEPTED", + "1952_75": "REJECTED", + "1987_410": "ACCEPTED", + "1988_189": "ACCEPTED", + "1992_24": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_407": "REJECTED", + "1985_320": "REJECTED", + "1985_5": "REJECTED", + "1960_241": "REJECTED", + "1975_445": "REJECTED", + "1972_282": "ACCEPTED", + "1987_358": "ACCEPTED", + "1969_182": "REJECTED", + "1976_3": "ACCEPTED", + "1969_65": "REJECTED", + "1986_460": "ACCEPTED", + "1970_17": "ACCEPTED", + "1993_216": "REJECTED", + "1988_410": "ACCEPTED", + "1963_25": "REJECTED", + "1964_105": "REJECTED", + "1960_295": "ACCEPTED", + "1993_834": "REJECTED", + "1973_392": "REJECTED", + "1992_273": "ACCEPTED", + "1990_234": "REJECTED", + "1961_12": "REJECTED", + "1973_388": "ACCEPTED", + "1954_51": "ACCEPTED", + "1958_71": "REJECTED", + "1988_469": "ACCEPTED", + "1977_145": "ACCEPTED", + "1963_103": "REJECTED", + "1969_254": "REJECTED", + "1973_68": "REJECTED", + "1963_289": "REJECTED", + "1974_6": "ACCEPTED", + "1977_146": "ACCEPTED", + "1981_388": "REJECTED", + "1985_262": "ACCEPTED", + "1986_234": "REJECTED", + "1978_270": "ACCEPTED", + "1993_756": "REJECTED", + "1985_312": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_434": "ACCEPTED", + "1978_36": "ACCEPTED", + "1953_57": "ACCEPTED", + "1968_147": "ACCEPTED", + "1992_159": "ACCEPTED", + "1989_351": "REJECTED", + "1968_342": "REJECTED", + "1988_477": "REJECTED", + "1988_459": "REJECTED", + "1959_139": "ACCEPTED", + "1986_385": "ACCEPTED", + "1956_59": "ACCEPTED", + "1995_278": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_168": "ACCEPTED", + "1982_213": "ACCEPTED", + "1975_5": "REJECTED", + "1990_92": "REJECTED", + "1988_144": "REJECTED", + "1970_347": "ACCEPTED", + "1967_17": "ACCEPTED", + "1974_18": "REJECTED", + "1974_117": "ACCEPTED", + "1988_64": "REJECTED", + "1985_228": "REJECTED", + "1992_325": "ACCEPTED", + "1984_232": "ACCEPTED", + "1980_374": "REJECTED", + "1984_70": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_426": "ACCEPTED", + "1981_322": "ACCEPTED", + "1971_453": "REJECTED", + "1962_430": "ACCEPTED", + "1964_25": "REJECTED", + "1964_282": "ACCEPTED", + "1977_242": "REJECTED", + "1971_617": "REJECTED", + "1980_69": "ACCEPTED", + "1992_704": "ACCEPTED", + "1967_34": "REJECTED", + "1961_3": "ACCEPTED", + "1990_613": "REJECTED", + "1965_74": "REJECTED", + "1989_23": "ACCEPTED", + "1983_377": "ACCEPTED", + "1991_87": "ACCEPTED", + "1961_417": "REJECTED", + "1954_32": "ACCEPTED", + "1966_46": "ACCEPTED", + "1957_110": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_355": "REJECTED", + "1959_189": "ACCEPTED", + "1964_129": "REJECTED", + "1977_321": "ACCEPTED", + "1977_159": "REJECTED", + "1979_283": "REJECTED", + "1971_466": "REJECTED", + "1973_64": "ACCEPTED", + "1967_75": "REJECTED", + "1982_132": "REJECTED", + "1969_492": "ACCEPTED", + "1985_201": "ACCEPTED", + "1959_86": "ACCEPTED", + "1971_506": "ACCEPTED", + "1987_404": "ACCEPTED", + "1980_244": "ACCEPTED", + "1977_239": "ACCEPTED", + "1981_374": "ACCEPTED", + "1965_141": "REJECTED", + "1978_295": "ACCEPTED", + "1956_24": "REJECTED", + "1959_134": "ACCEPTED", + "1983_65": "REJECTED", + "1984_332": "ACCEPTED", + "1967_150": "ACCEPTED", + "1957_129": "ACCEPTED", + "1979_412": "ACCEPTED", + "1970_66": "ACCEPTED", + "1975_50": "REJECTED", + "1960_87": "ACCEPTED", + "1980_427": "ACCEPTED", + "1975_236": "REJECTED", + "1969_235": "REJECTED", + "1969_206": "ACCEPTED", + "1978_247": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_94": "ACCEPTED", + "1971_231": "REJECTED", + "1959_57": "ACCEPTED", + "1986_20": "REJECTED", + "1969_312": "REJECTED", + "1953_122": "ACCEPTED", + "1966_150": "ACCEPTED", + "1993_968": "ACCEPTED", + "1966_51": "REJECTED", + "1968_359": "REJECTED", + "1967_57": "REJECTED", + "1973_58": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_182": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_17": "REJECTED", + "1972_299": "REJECTED", + "1975_114": "ACCEPTED", + "1969_352": "REJECTED", + "1971_310": "REJECTED", + "1976_352": "ACCEPTED", + "1959_196": "ACCEPTED", + "1970_187": "ACCEPTED", + "1974_238": "ACCEPTED", + "1970_145": "ACCEPTED", + "1979_9": "ACCEPTED", + "1989_176": "REJECTED", + "1993_25": "REJECTED", + "1962_384": "ACCEPTED", + "1963_208": "REJECTED", + "1968_220": "REJECTED", + "1964_109": "REJECTED", + "1956_74": "REJECTED", + "1988_218": "ACCEPTED", + "1982_134": "ACCEPTED", + "1971_654": "REJECTED", + "1979_385": "REJECTED", + "1956_27": "ACCEPTED", + "1989_268": "ACCEPTED", + "1978_182": "REJECTED", + "1958_76": "REJECTED", + "1963_227": "ACCEPTED", + "1960_37": "ACCEPTED", + "1970_12": "ACCEPTED", + "1960_311": "REJECTED", + "1983_189": "REJECTED", + "1964_271": "REJECTED", + "1958_163": "REJECTED", + "1982_166": "ACCEPTED", + "1973_346": "ACCEPTED", + "1987_316": "ACCEPTED", + "1960_189": "REJECTED", + "1976_117": "REJECTED", + "1981_408": "REJECTED", + "1979_269": "ACCEPTED", + "1977_240": "REJECTED", + "1954_13": "REJECTED", + "1987_354": "REJECTED", + "1967_245": "ACCEPTED", + "1969_189": "ACCEPTED", + "1958_174": "ACCEPTED", + "1961_90": "ACCEPTED", + "1961_279": "ACCEPTED", + "1986_73": "ACCEPTED", + "1979_387": "REJECTED", + "1981_256": "REJECTED", + "1954_160": "REJECTED", + "1970_90": "REJECTED", + "1959_52": "REJECTED", + "1989_219": "REJECTED", + "1961_71": "REJECTED", + "1985_16": "ACCEPTED", + "1970_188": "ACCEPTED", + "1964_275": "REJECTED", + "1972_584": "ACCEPTED", + "1961_261": "ACCEPTED", + "1973_347": "REJECTED", + "1962_364": "REJECTED", + "1990_188": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_110": "ACCEPTED", + "1959_75": "REJECTED", + "1985_12": "ACCEPTED", + "1986_14": "REJECTED", + "1972_538": "REJECTED", + "1960_44": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_142": "ACCEPTED", + "1951_80": "ACCEPTED", + "1970_132": "REJECTED", + "1984_1": "ACCEPTED", + "1985_111": "ACCEPTED", + "1984_137": "ACCEPTED", + "1963_22": "REJECTED", + "1975_241": "REJECTED", + "1961_273": "ACCEPTED", + "1967_178": "REJECTED", + "1979_377": "REJECTED", + "1962_77": "ACCEPTED", + "1951_10": "ACCEPTED", + "1985_289": "ACCEPTED", + "1983_329": "ACCEPTED", + "1971_595": "REJECTED", + "1988_403": "ACCEPTED", + "1964_127": "REJECTED", + "1974_111": "REJECTED", + "1989_243": "ACCEPTED", + "1954_158": "REJECTED", + "1984_244": "ACCEPTED", + "1958_25": "ACCEPTED", + "1991_209": "REJECTED", + "1971_75": "ACCEPTED", + "1988_25": "ACCEPTED", + "1953_14": "ACCEPTED", + "1977_353": "REJECTED", + "1984_238": "REJECTED", + "1975_469": "ACCEPTED", + "1986_46": "REJECTED", + "1964_250": "ACCEPTED", + "1985_71": "ACCEPTED", + "1989_216": "ACCEPTED", + "1967_94": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_113": "REJECTED", + "1960_265": "ACCEPTED", + "1991_198": "REJECTED", + "1964_196": "ACCEPTED", + "1961_204": "ACCEPTED", + "1984_57": "ACCEPTED", + "1995_394": "REJECTED", + "1968_371": "REJECTED", + "1968_312": "ACCEPTED", + "1963_63": "REJECTED", + "1975_425": "REJECTED", + "1992_258": "REJECTED", + "1976_308": "REJECTED", + "1984_98": "ACCEPTED", + "1973_273": "REJECTED", + "1960_226": "REJECTED", + "1971_166": "REJECTED", + "1964_165": "ACCEPTED", + "1985_128": "REJECTED", + "1974_215": "ACCEPTED", + "1987_427": "REJECTED", + "1964_68": "ACCEPTED", + "1958_155": "REJECTED", + "1995_1075": "REJECTED", + "1973_50": "ACCEPTED", + "1975_265": "REJECTED", + "1960_317": "ACCEPTED", + "1969_127": "ACCEPTED", + "1954_46": "REJECTED", + "1971_515": "REJECTED", + "1964_71": "REJECTED", + "1975_320": "REJECTED", + "1952_81": "ACCEPTED", + "1965_311": "REJECTED", + "1980_111": "ACCEPTED", + "1961_117": "REJECTED", + "1973_261": "REJECTED", + "1992_458": "ACCEPTED", + "1969_513": "REJECTED", + "1986_187": "REJECTED", + "1992_744": "ACCEPTED", + "1961_331": "REJECTED", + "1963_47": "ACCEPTED", + "1980_61": "ACCEPTED", + "1962_254": "ACCEPTED", + "1979_345": "REJECTED", + "1971_201": "REJECTED", + "1961_97": "ACCEPTED", + "1990_14": "ACCEPTED", + "2013_35": "ACCEPTED", + "2003_794": "REJECTED", + "1999_1001": "ACCEPTED", + "2013_30": "ACCEPTED", + "2013_95": "ACCEPTED", + "2008_1629": "REJECTED", + "2013_57": "REJECTED", + "1995_1177": "ACCEPTED", + "2008_2444": "ACCEPTED", + "2013_121": "ACCEPTED", + "2013_113": "REJECTED", + "2017_14": "ACCEPTED", + "2013_101": "ACCEPTED", + "2000_1559": "REJECTED", + "1998_83": "ACCEPTED", + "1995_2": "ACCEPTED", + "2017_61": "ACCEPTED" + }, + "explanation": { + "1951_10": { + "expert_1": "The appellants are owners of a property known as Bharat Bhuvan Theatre at Ahmedabad. The respond- ents are the lessees of the said theatre. The term of the lease was to expire on the 2nd December, 1945, unless the lessees gave to the land lords three months previous notice in writing of their intention of exercising their option of renewal of the lease for a further period of two years. \nOn the 13th December, 1945, the appellants filed the suit out of which this appeal arises for ejectment of the respondents and for recovery of certain amounts. This suit was decreed on the 14th October, 1947, on the following findings (1) that the respondents had not exercised the option of the renewal of the lease according to the stipulations contained in the lease, (2) that they had committed breaches of the terms of the lease, and (3) that they were not protected by the Rent Restriction Act. \nAn enquiry was directed into the amount of mesne prof- its. The respondents filed an append in the High Court against the decree of the Joint Civil Judge on the 10th November, 1947. The appeal was heard by a Bench of the High Court (Weston and Dixit JJ.) on the 26th February, 1948, and was decided on the 1st April, 1948. \nThe judgment and decree of the Joint Civil Judge were reversed and the plaintiffs suit was dismissed. The High Court affirmed the finding of the trial court on the first point and held in agreement with it that the respondents had not proved that they gave three months previous notice in writing to the appellants for renewal of the lease as required by clause 4 (2) of the lease. It reversed the finding of the trial Judge on the point that the respondents had committed breaches of the terms contained in clause 2 (20) of the lease.\nIt was contended before the High Court that the appeal being in the nature of a rehearing, it should be decided in accordance with the provisions of Act LVII of 1947 which came into force on the 13th February, 1948, and not in accordance with the provisions of the Act in force at the time when the decree was passed by the trial court. \nIn other words, the contention was that there having been a change in the law after the date of the decree passed by the trial Judge and before the appeal was heard, the rights of the parties should be determined in accordance with the law as it stood on the date of the hearing of the appeal. \nThe High Court gave effect to this contention and set aside the decree made for ejectment of the respondents. Learned counsel for the appellants challenged the deci- sion of the High Court before us on three grounds (1) that assuming that the appeal had to be decided by the High Court in accordance with the provisions of Act LVII of 1947, the provisions of that Act had no application to pending ap- peals which had been excluded from its ambit (9,)that Act LVII of 1947 had been amended by Bombay Act III of 1949 and that the appeal pending in this court should be decided in accordance with the provisions of the amended Act which excluded pending appeals from the purview of Act LVII of 1947 and (3) that the High Court wrongly reversed the trial courts finding that the respondents had committed breaches of the terms contained in clause 2 (20) of the lease.\nIn our opinion, the decision of the appeal depends solely on the construction of sections 12 and 50 of Act LVII of 1947. The question to decide is whether the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, LVII of 1947, which was enacted on the 19th January, 1948, and which came into force on the 13th February, 1948, has applica- tion to pending appeals or whether its retrospective effect is limited to cases mentioned in section 50 of the Act. \nThe point whether the option of renewal was exercised according to the covenants of the lease is concluded by a concurrent finding of fact and nothing that Mr. Daphthary said in support of his contention in any way shakes that finding. The case must therefore be decided on the assump- tion that the respondents did not exercise the option given to them under the lease for its renewal. We are also not impressed with the argument of the learned counsel for the appellants that the High Court wrongly reversed the finding of the trial Judge on the point that the respondents commit- ted breaches of the terms of the tease. We should not howev- er be taken to concur in all the reasons given by the High Court for reversing that finding. \nWhether the High Court was right in holding that the provisions of Act LVII of 1947 have application to appeals pending at the time when that Act came into force the answer to this question depends on the construction to be placed on sections 12 and 50 of Act LVII of 1947.\nThe High Court held that section 50 merely provided for transfer of pending suits and proceedings to courts given jurisdiction under the Act to hear them and that from its ambit execution proceedings and appeals were excluded be- cause no question could arise of their being transferred from one court to another and that an appeal being a contin- uation of the suit and in the nature of a re-hearing, the provisions of section 12 should be applied to pending ap- peals.\nThe opinion expressed by the Division Bench on the construction of sections 12 and 50 of the Act was questioned in Nilkanth v. Rasiklal (J), and the matter was referred to a Full Bench.\nThe Full Bench overruled the decision reached by the Division Bench on the construction of section 50 and observed that it was clear that in terms the provi- sions of the new Act and the rules made thereunder are made to apply only to such suits and proceedings which are trans- ferred under the provisions of this section and that its retrospective effect is confined to what is expressly stated in section 50 of the Act. \n We are in respectful agreement with the view expressed by the Full Bench.\nOn a plain reading of the language of sections 12 and 50 it seems clear to us that the Act was given retrospective operation only to a limited extent and execution proceedings and appeals were excluded from this effect and were to be governed by the provisions of the law in force at the time when the decrees were passed. The concluding words of section 50 and there- upon all the provisions of this Act and the rules made thereunder shall apply to all such suits and proceedings fully bear out this construction.\nMr. Daphthary contended that the whole object of section 50 was to make provision for transfer of pending cases to courts which were given jurisdiction under the Act to hear them and the section did not concern itself with the extent of the retrospective operation of the Act, and that section 12 of the Act which gives protection to tenants should \n A. I. R. 1949 Bom. 210. be construed as having retrospective effect. In our opinion this contention is not sound.\nSection 50 cannot be de- scribed as a section providing merely for transfer of pend- ing cases to courts having jurisdiction to deal with them. It is on the other hand a repeal section in the new stat- ute. \n It repeals the two earlier statutes, and while repeal- ing them it provides that the repeal shall not affect executions and appeals and that the provisions of the Act shall apply to all pending suits which shall be transferred to the courts having jurisdiction to hear them under section 28 of the Act.\nWe are also inclined to agree with the view of the Full Bench that section 12 is in terms prospective and not retrospective.\nSub-section (2) clearly relates to suits which may be instituted after the Act comes into force. \n It cannot apply to suits which were already pending when the Act was put on the statute book.\nSub-section (3) which gives the right to the tenant to pay or tender the rent at the hearing of the suit only applies to those suits which may be instituted after the Act comes into operation because it in terms states in such suit and not in any suit. Such suit can only be a suit referred to in subsec- tions (2) and (3) of section 12.", + "expert_2": "the appellants filed the suit out of which this appeal arises for ejectment of the respondents and for recovery of certain amounts.\nit reached the conclusion that although the decree appealed from was right on the date it was made, yet in view of the altered circumstances created by reason of coming into operation of Act LVII of 1947 the appellants were not enti- tled to recovery of possession of the suit premises.\nthe contention was that there having been a change in the law after the date of the decree passed by the trial Judge and before the appeal was heard, the rights of the parties should be determined in accordance with the law as it stood on the date of the hearing of the appeal.\nOn a plain reading of the language of sections 12 and 50 it seems clear to us that the Act was given retrospective operation only to a limited extent and execution proceedings and appeals were excluded from this effect and were to be governed by the provisions of the law in force at the time when the decrees were passed.\nSection 50 cannot be de- scribed as a section providing merely for transfer of pend- ing cases to courts having jurisdiction to deal with them. It is on the other hand a repeal section in the new stat- ute. \n It repeals the two earlier statutes, and while repeal- ing them it provides that the repeal shall not affect executions and appeals and that the provisions of the Act shall apply to all pending suits which shall be transferred to the courts having jurisdiction to hear them under section 28 of the Act.\nsection 12 is in terms prospective and not retrospective", + "expert_3": "The appellants are owners of a property known as Bharat Bhuvan Theatre at Ahmedabad. The respond- ents are the lessees of the said theatre\nThe term of the lease was to expire on the 2nd December, 1945, unless the lessees gave to the land lords three months previous notice in writing of their intention of exercising their option of renewal of the lease for a further period of two years\nOn the 13th December, 1945, the appellants filed the suit out of which this appeal arises for ejectment of the respondents and for recovery of certain amounts\nThis suit was decreed on the 14th October, 1947, on the following findings (1) that the respondents had not exercised the option of the renewal of the lease according to the stipulations contained in the lease, (2) that they had committed breaches of the terms of the lease, and (3) that they were not protected by the Rent Restriction Act.\nThe respondents filed an append in the High Court against the decree of the Joint Civil Judge on the 10th November, 1947\nThe judgment and decree of the Joint Civil Judge were reversed and the plaintiffs suit was dismissed.\nThe High Court affirmed the finding of the trial court on the first point and held in agreement with it that the respondents had not proved that they gave three months previous notice in writing to the appellants for renewal of the lease as required by clause 4 (2) of the lease. It reversed the finding of the trial Judge on the point that the respondents had committed breaches of the terms contained in clause 2 (20) of the lease. \nFinally, it reached the conclusion that although the decree appealed from was right on the date it was made, yet in view of the altered circumstances created by reason of coming into operation of Act LVII of 1947 the appellants were not enti- tled to recovery of possession of the suit premises.\nBeing aggrieved by the judgment of the High Court, the appellants obtained a certificate and filed an appeal in this court on the 7th March, 1949\nthe contention was that there having been a change in the law after the date of the decree passed by the trial Judge and before the appeal was heard, the rights of the parties should be determined in accordance with the law as it stood on the date of the hearing of the appeal. \nThe High Court gave effect to this contention and set aside the decree made for ejectment of the respondents\nIn our opinion, the decision of the appeal depends solely on the construction of sections 12 and 50 of Act LVII of 1947.\nThe question to decide is whether the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, LVII of 1947, which was enacted on the 19th January, 1948, and which came into force on the 13th February, 1948, has applica- tion to pending appeals or whether its retrospective effect is limited to cases mentioned in section 50 of the Act.\nThe case must therefore be decided on the assump- tion that the respondents did not exercise the option given to them under the lease for its renewal\nWhether the High Court was right in holding that the provisions of Act LVII of 1947 have application to appeals pending at the time when that Act came into force the answer to this question depends on the construction to be placed on sections 12 and 50 of Act LVII of 1947\nSection 12 of the Act is in these terms- \n A landlord shall not be entitled to the recovery of possession of any premises so long as the tenant pays, or is ready and willing to pay, the amount of the standard rent and permitted increases, if any, and observes and performs the other conditions of the tenancy, in so far as they are consistent with the provisions of this Act. \n No suit for recovery of possession shall be insti- tuted by a landlord against a tenant on the ground of non- payment of the standard rent or permitted increases due, until the expiration of one month next after notice in writing of the demand of the standard rent or permitted increases has been served upon the tenant in the manner provided in section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.\nNo decree for eviction shall be passed in any such suit if, at the hearing. of the suit, the tenant pays or tenders in court the standard rent or permitted increases then due together with the costs of the suit.\nSection 50 which occurs in Part IV dealing with miscellaneous matters is the repeal section. It repeals the Act of 1939 and the Act of 1944, and while repealing these statutes it provides as follows-- Provided that all suits and proceedings (other than execution proceedings and appeals) between a landlord and a tenant relating to the recovery or fixing of rent or posses- sion of any premises to which the provisions of Part II apply and all suits and proceedings by a manager of a hotel or an owner of a lodging house against a lodger for the recovery of charges for, or possession of, the accommodation provided in a hotel or lodging house situate in an area to which Part III applies, which are pending in any Court, shall be transferred to and continued before the courts which would have jurisdiction to try such suits or proceed- ings under this Act, and thereupon all the provisions of this Act and the rules made thereunder shall apply to all such suits and proceedings. \n Provided further that-- (a) every order passed or act done by the Control- lers under Part IV of the Bombay Rents, Hotel Rates and Lodging House Rates (Control) Act, 1944, and every order or act deemed to have been passed or done under that Part shall be deemed to have been passed or done under this Act and (b) all proceedings pending before the Controllers under Part IV of that Act shall be transferred to and continued before the Controllers appointed under this Act as if they were proceedings instituted before the Con- trollers under this Act The High Court held that section 50 merely provided for transfer of pending suits and proceedings to courts given jurisdiction under the Act to hear them and that from its ambit execution proceedings and appeals were excluded be- cause no question could arise of their being transferred from one court to another and that an appeal being a contin- uation of the suit and in the nature of a re-hearing, the provisions of section 12 should be applied to pending ap- peals.\nThe Full Bench overruled the decision reached by the Division Bench on the construction of section 50 and observed that it was clear that in terms the provi- sions of the new Act and the rules made thereunder are made to apply only to such suits and proceedings which are trans- ferred under the provisions of this section and that its retrospective effect is confined to what is expressly stated in section 50 of the Act. \n We are in respectful agreement with the view expressed by the Full Bench.\nOn a plain reading of the language of sections 12 and 50 it seems clear to us that the Act was given retrospective operation only to a limited extent and execution proceedings and appeals were excluded from this effect and were to be governed by the provisions of the law in force at the time when the decrees were passed\nThe concluding words of section 50 and there- upon all the provisions of this Act and the rules made thereunder shall apply to all such suits and proceedings fully bear out this construction\nSection 50 cannot be de- scribed as a section providing merely for transfer of pend- ing cases to courts having jurisdiction to deal with them. It is on the other hand a repeal section in the new stat- ute. \n It repeals the two earlier statutes, and while repeal- ing them it provides that the repeal shall not affect executions and appeals and that the provisions of the Act shall apply to all pending suits which shall be transferred to the courts having jurisdiction to hear them under section 28 of the Act. We are also inclined to agree with the view of the Full Bench that section 12 is in terms prospective and not retrospective.\nSub-section (2) clearly relates to suits which may be instituted after the Act comes into force. \n It cannot apply to suits which were already pending when the Act was put on the statute book.\nSub-section (3) which gives the right to the tenant to pay or tender the rent at the hearing of the suit only applies to those suits which may be instituted after the Act comes into operation because it in terms states in such suit and not in any suit.\nSuch suit can only be a suit referred to in subsec- tions (2) and (3) of section 12", + "expert_4": "The appellants are owners of a property known as Bharat Bhuvan Theatre at Ahmedabad. The respond- ents are the lessees of the said theatre.\nThe term of the lease was to expire on the 2nd December, 1945, unless the lessees gave to the land lords three months previous notice in writing of their intention of exercising their option of renewal of the lease for a further period of two years.\nOn the 13th December, 1945, the appellants filed the suit out of which this appeal arises for ejectment of the respondents and for recovery of certain amounts.\nThis suit was decreed on the 14th October, 1947, on the following findings (1) that the respondents had not exercised the option of the renewal of the lease according to the stipulations contained in the lease, (2) that they had committed breaches of the terms of the lease, and (3) that they were not protected by the Rent Restriction Act.\nAn enquiry was directed into the amount of mesne prof- its.\nThe respondents filed an append in the High Court against the decree of the Joint Civil Judge on the 10th November, 1947.\nThe judgment and decree of the Joint Civil Judge were reversed and the plaintiffs suit was dismissed.\nThe High Court affirmed the finding of the trial court on the first point and held in agreement with it that the respondents had not proved that they gave three months previous notice in writing to the appellants for renewal of the lease as required by clause 4 (2) of the lease.\nIt reversed the finding of the trial Judge on the point that the respondents had committed breaches of the terms contained in clause 2 (20) of the lease.\nFinally, it reached the conclusion that although the decree appealed from was right on the date it was made, yet in view of the altered circumstances created by reason of coming into operation of Act LVII of 1947 the appellants were not enti- tled to recovery of possession of the suit premises.\nIt was contended before the High Court that the appeal being in the nature of a rehearing, it should be decided in accordance with the provisions of Act LVII of 1947 which came into force on the 13th February, 1948, and not in accordance with the provisions of the Act in force at the time when the decree was passed by the trial court.\nIn other words, the contention was that there having been a change in the law after the date of the decree passed by the trial Judge and before the appeal was heard, the rights of the parties should be determined in accordance with the law as it stood on the date of the hearing of the appeal.\nThe High Court gave effect to this contention and set aside the decree made for ejectment of the respondents.\nLearned counsel for the appellants challenged the deci- sion of the High Court before us on three grounds (1) that assuming that the appeal had to be decided by the High Court in accordance with the provisions of Act LVII of 1947, the provisions of that Act had no application to pending ap- peals which had been excluded from its ambit (9,)that Act LVII of 1947 had been amended by Bombay Act III of 1949 and that the appeal pending in this court should be decided in accordance with the provisions of the amended Act which excluded pending appeals from the purview of Act LVII of 1947 and (3) that the High Court wrongly reversed the trial courts finding that the respondents had committed breaches of the terms contained in clause 2 (20) of the lease.\nThe learned counsel for the respondents besides controverting the contentions raised on behalf of the appellants contended that both the courts had erred in holding that the respondents had not proved that they exer- cised the option of renewal of the lease according to the stipulations contained therein.\nIn our opinion, the decision of the appeal depends solely on the construction of sections 12 and 50 of Act LVII of 1947.\nThe question to decide is whether the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, LVII of 1947, which was enacted on the 19th January, 1948, and which came into force on the 13th February, 1948, has applica- tion to pending appeals or whether its retrospective effect is limited to cases mentioned in section 50 of the Act.\nThe point whether the option of renewal was exercised according to the covenants of the lease is concluded by a concurrent finding of fact and nothing that Mr. Daphthary said in support of his contention in any way shakes that finding.\nThe case must therefore be decided on the assump- tion that the respondents did not exercise the option given to them under the lease for its renewal.\nWe are also not impressed with the argument of the learned counsel for the appellants that the High Court wrongly reversed the finding of the trial Judge on the point that the respondents commit- ted breaches of the terms of the tease.\nWe should not howev- er be taken to concur in all the reasons given by the High Court for reversing that finding.\nWhether the High Court was right in holding that the provisions of Act LVII of 1947 have application to appeals pending at the time when that Act came into force the answer to this question depends on the construction to be placed on sections 12 and 50 of Act LVII of 1947.\nSection 12 of the Act is in these terms- \n A landlord shall not be entitled to the recovery of possession of any premises so long as the tenant pays, or is ready and willing to pay, the amount of the standard rent and permitted increases, if any, and observes and performs the other conditions of the tenancy, in so far as they are consistent with the provisions of this Act.\nNo suit for recovery of possession shall be insti- tuted by a landlord against a tenant on the ground of non- payment of the standard rent or permitted increases due, until the expiration of one month next after notice in writing of the demand of the standard rent or permitted increases has been served upon the tenant in the manner provided in section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882\nNo decree for eviction shall be passed in any such suit if, at the hearing. of the suit, the tenant pays or tenders in court the standard rent or permitted increases then due together with the costs of the suit.\nExplanation--In any case where there is a dispute as to the amount of standard rent or permitted increases recovera- ble under this Act the tenant shall be deemed to be ready and willing to pay such amount if, before the expiry of the period of one month after notice referred to in sub-section (2), he makes an application to the court under sub-section (3) of section 11 and thereafter pays or tenders the amount or rent or permitted increases specified in the order made by the court.\nThis is the substantive section giving protection to the tenant against ejectment.\nSection 50 which occurs in Part IV dealing with miscellaneous matters is the repeal section.\nIt repeals the Act of 1939 and the Act of 1944, and while repealing these statutes it provides as follows-- Provided that all suits and proceedings (other than execution proceedings and appeals) between a landlord and a tenant relating to the recovery or fixing of rent or posses- sion of any premises to which the provisions of Part II apply and all suits and proceedings by a manager of a hotel or an owner of a lodging house against a lodger for the recovery of charges for, or possession of, the accommodation provided in a hotel or lodging house situate in an area to which Part III applies, which are pending in any Court, shall be transferred to and continued before the courts which would have jurisdiction to try such suits or proceed- ings under this Act, and thereupon all the provisions of this Act and the rules made thereunder shall apply to all such suits and proceedings.\nProvided further that-- (a) every order passed or act done by the Control- lers under Part IV of the Bombay Rents, Hotel Rates and Lodging House Rates (Control) Act, 1944, and every order or act deemed to have been passed or done under that Part shall be deemed to have been passed or done under this Act and (b) all proceedings pending before the Controllers under Part IV of that Act shall be transferred to and continued before the Controllers appointed under this Act as if they were proceedings instituted before the Con- trollers under this Act The High Court held that section 50 merely provided for transfer of pending suits and proceedings to courts given jurisdiction under the Act to hear them and that from its ambit execution proceedings and appeals were excluded be- cause no question could arise of their being transferred from one court to another and that an appeal being a contin- uation of the suit and in the nature of a re-hearing, the provisions of section 12 should be applied to pending ap- peals.\nThe opinion expressed by the Division Bench on the construction of sections 12 and 50 of the Act was questioned in Nilkanth v. Rasiklal (J), and the matter was referred to a Full Bench.\nThe Full Bench overruled the decision reached by the Division Bench on the construction of section 50 and observed that it was clear that in terms the provi- sions of the new Act and the rules made thereunder are made to apply only to such suits and proceedings which are trans- ferred under the provisions of this section and that its retrospective effect is confined to what is expressly stated in section 50 of the Act.\nWe are in respectful agreement with the view expressed by the Full Bench\nOn a plain reading of the language of sections 12 and 50 it seems clear to us that the Act was given retrospective operation only to a limited extent and execution proceedings and appeals were excluded from this effect and were to be governed by the provisions of the law in force at the time when the decrees were passed.\nThe concluding words of section 50 and there- upon all the provisions of this Act and the rules made thereunder shall apply to all such suits and proceedings fully bear out this construction\nMr. Daphthary contended that the whole object of section 50 was to make provision for transfer of pending cases to courts which were given jurisdiction under the Act to hear them and the section did not concern itself with the extent of the retrospective operation of the Act, and that section 12 of the Act which gives protection to tenants should \n A. I. R. 1949 Bom. 210. be construed as having retrospective effect.\nIn our opinion this contention is not sound.\nSection 50 cannot be de- scribed as a section providing merely for transfer of pend- ing cases to courts having jurisdiction to deal with them.\nIt is on the other hand a repeal section in the new stat- ute. \n It repeals the two earlier statutes, and while repeal- ing them it provides that the repeal shall not affect executions and appeals and that the provisions of the Act shall apply to all pending suits which shall be transferred to the courts having jurisdiction to hear them under section 28 of the Act. We are also inclined to agree with the view of the Full Bench that section 12 is in terms prospective and not retrospective. Sub-section (2) clearly relates to suits which may be instituted after the Act comes into force. \n It cannot apply to suits which were already pending when the Act was put on the statute book.\nSub-section (3) which gives the right to the tenant to pay or tender the rent at the hearing of the suit only applies to those suits which may be instituted after the Act comes into operation because it in terms states in such suit and not in any suit. Such suit can only be a suit referred to in subsec- tions (2) and (3) of section 12.", + "expert_5": "that assuming that the appeal had to be decided by the High Court in accordance with the provisions of Act LVII of 1947, the provisions of that Act had no application to pending ap- peals which had been excluded from its ambit\nthat Act LVII of 1947 had been amended by Bombay Act III of 1949 and that the appeal pending in this court should be decided in accordance with the provisions of the amended Act which excluded pending appeals from the purview of Act LVII of 1947\nthat the High Court wrongly reversed the trial courts finding that the respondents had committed breaches of the terms contained in clause 2 (20) of the lease\nThe point whether the option of renewal was exercised according to the covenants of the lease is concluded by a concurrent finding of fact and nothing that Mr. Daphthary said in support of his contention in any way shakes that finding.\nWe are also not impressed with the argument of the learned counsel for the appellants that the High Court wrongly reversed the finding of the trial Judge on the point that the respondents commit- ted breaches of the terms of the tease.\nA landlord shall not be entitled to the recovery of possession of any premises so long as the tenant pays, or is ready and willing to pay, the amount of the standard rent and permitted increases, if any, and observes and performs the other conditions of the tenancy, in so far as they are consistent with the provisions of this Act. \n No suit for recovery of possession shall be insti- tuted by a landlord against a tenant on the ground of non- payment of the standard rent or permitted increases due, until the expiration of one month next after notice in writing of the demand of the standard rent or permitted increases has been served upon the tenant in the manner provided in section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. No decree for eviction shall be passed in any such suit if, at the hearing. of the suit, the tenant pays or tenders in court the standard rent or permitted increases then due together with the costs of the suit. \n Explanation--In any case where there is a dispute as to the amount of standard rent or permitted increases recovera- ble under this Act the tenant shall be deemed to be ready and willing to pay such amount if, before the expiry of the period of one month after notice referred to in sub-section (2), he makes an application to the court under sub-section (3) of section 11 and thereafter pays or tenders the amount or rent or permitted increases specified in the order made by the court.\nProvided that all suits and proceedings (other than execution proceedings and appeals) between a landlord and a tenant relating to the recovery or fixing of rent or posses- sion of any premises to which the provisions of Part II apply and all suits and proceedings by a manager of a hotel or an owner of a lodging house against a lodger for the recovery of charges for, or possession of, the accommodation provided in a hotel or lodging house situate in an area to which Part III applies, which are pending in any Court, shall be transferred to and continued before the courts which would have jurisdiction to try such suits or proceed- ings under this Act, and thereupon all the provisions of this Act and the rules made thereunder shall apply to all such suits and proceedings.\nother than execution proceedings and appeals\nProvided further that-- (a) every order passed or act done by the Control- lers under Part IV of the Bombay Rents, Hotel Rates and Lodging House Rates (Control) Act, 1944, and every order or act deemed to have been passed or done under that Part shall be deemed to have been passed or done under this Act and (b) all proceedings pending before the Controllers under Part IV of that Act shall be transferred to and continued before the Controllers appointed under this Act as if they were proceedings instituted before the Con- trollers under this Act The High Court held that section 50 merely provided for transfer of pending suits and proceedings to courts given jurisdiction under the Act to hear them and that from its ambit execution proceedings and appeals were excluded be- cause no question could arise of their being transferred from one court to another and that an appeal being a contin- uation of the suit and in the nature of a re-hearing, the provisions of section 12 should be applied to pending ap- peals.\nThe Full Bench overruled the decision reached by the Division Bench on the construction of section 50 and observed that it was clear that in terms the provi- sions of the new Act and the rules made thereunder are made to apply only to such suits and proceedings which are trans- ferred under the provisions of this section and that its retrospective effect is confined to what is expressly stated in section 50 of the Act.\nWe are in respectful agreement with the view expressed by the Full Bench.\nOn a plain reading of the language of sections 12 and 50 it seems clear to us that the Act was given retrospective operation only to a limited extent and execution proceedings and appeals were excluded from this effect and were to be governed by the provisions of the law in force at the time when the decrees were passed.\nIt repeals the two earlier statutes, and while repeal- ing them it provides that the repeal shall not affect executions and appeals and that the provisions of the Act shall apply to all pending suits which shall be transferred to the courts having jurisdiction to hear them under section 28 of the Act.\nSub-section (2) clearly relates to suits which may be instituted after the Act comes into force. \n It cannot apply to suits which were already pending when the Act was put on the statute book. Sub-section (3) which gives the right to the tenant to pay or tender the rent at the hearing of the suit only applies to those suits which may be instituted after the Act comes into operation because it in terms states in such suit and not in any suit." + }, + "1951_30": { + "expert_1": "This is an appeal by special leave from an order of the High Court of Judicature at Patna setting aside an order of acquittal of the appellants by the Sessions Judge, Purnea, and directing their retrial. \n The appellants were prosecuted for alleged offences under sections 147, 148, 323, 324, 326, 302 and 302/149 of the Indian Penal Code at the instance of one Polai Lal Biswas who lodged a complaint against them before the po- lice. \n The prosecution case was that, while the complainant was harvesting the paddy crop on his field at about 10 a.m. on 29th November, 1949, a mob of about fifty persons came on to the field armed with ballams, lathis and other weapons and that the first appellant Logendranath Jha, who was leading the mob, demanded a settlement of all outstanding disputes with the complainant and ,said he would not allow the paddy to be removed unless the disputes were settled. An altercation followed as a result of which Logendra or- dered an assault by his men. Then Logendra and one of his men, Harihar, gave ballam blows to one of the labourers, Kangali, who fell down and died on the spot. \n Information was given to the police who investigated the case and submitted the charge-sheet. The committing Magistrate found that a prima facie case was made out and committed the appellants to the Court of Sessions for trial. The appellants pleaded not guilty alleging inter alia, that Mohender and Debender, the brothers of Logendra (appel- lants 2 and 3) were not present in the village of Dandkhora with which they had no concern, as all the lands in that village had been allotted to Logendra at a previous parti- tion, that Logendra himself was not in the village at the time of the occurrence but arrived soon after and was dragged to the place at the instance of his enemies in the village and was placed under arrest by the Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police who had arrived there previously.\nThe learned Sessions Judge examined the evidence in great detail and found that the existence of factions as alleged by the appellants was true. He found, however, that the appellants plea of alibi was not satisfactorily made out, but the truth of the prosecution, he proceeded to observe, cannot be judged by the falsehood of the defence nor can the prosecution derive its strength from the weak- ness of the defence. Prosecution must stand on its own legs and must prove the story told by it at the very first stage. The manner of occurrence alleged by the prosecution must be established beyond doubt before the accused persons can be convicted. \n Approaching the case in this manner and seeing that the basis of the prosecution case was that Polai had batai settlement of the disputed land and had raised the paddy crop which he was harvesting when the occurrence took place, the learned Sessions Judge examined the evidence of the prosecution witnesses who belonged to the opposite faction critically and found that the story of the prosecu- tion was not acceptable.\nThis false story, in his opinion, vitally affected the prosecution case regarding the alleged manner of the occurrence. He also found a number of discrepancies and contradictions in the evidence of the prosecution witnesses, which, in his view, tended to show that the prosecution was guilty of concealment of the real facts.\nIn view of such conceal- ment of real facts, the learned Judge concluded, it does not appear to me to be possible to apportion liability and to decide which of the two parties commenced the fight and which acted in self-defence. Such being the position, it is not possible at all to hold either party responsible for what took place. In such a view of the matter coupled with the fact that the manner of occurrence alleged by the prose- cution has not been established to be true beyond doubt, I think that the accused persons cannot be safely convicted of any of the offences for which they have been charged. \nThe learned Judge accordingly acquitted the appellants of all the charges framed against them.\nAgainst that order the complainant Polai preferred a revision petition to the High Court under section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code., The learned Judge who heard the petition reviewed the evidence at some length and came to the conclusion that the judgment of the learned Sessions Judge could not be allowed to stand as the acquittal of the appellants was perverse . \nIn his opinion, the entire judgment displays a lack of true perspective in a case of this kind. The Sessions Judge had completely misdirected himself in looking to the minor discrepancies in the case and ignoring the essential matters so far as the case is concerned, and there was no justifiable ground for rejecting the prosecution evidence regarding the cultivation and harvesting by Polai.\nOn behalf of the appellants Mr. Sinha raised two conten- tions. In the first place, he submitted that having regard to section 417 of the Criminal Procedure Code which provides for an appeal to the High Court from an order of acquittal only at the instance of the Government, a revision petition under section 439 at the instance of a private party was incompetent, and, secondly, that sub-section (4) of section 439 clearly showed that the High Court exceeded its powers of revision in the present case in upsetting the findings of fact of the trial Judge.\nas we are of opinion that his second and alternative contention must prevail.\nIt will be seen from the judgment summarised above that the learned Judge in the High Court re-appraised the evi- dence in the case and disagreed with the Sessions Judges findings of fact on the ground that they were perverse and displayed a lack of true perspective. \nHe went further and, by way of expressing in very clear terms as to how perverse the judgment of the court below is, he indicated that the discrepancies in the prosecution evidence and the circum- stances of the case which led the Sessions Judge to discred- it the prosecution story afforded no justifiable ground for the conclusion that the prosecution failed to establish their case.\nWe are of opinion that the learned Judge in the High Court did not properly appreciate the scope of inquiry in revision against an order of acquittal.\nThough sub-section(1) of section 439 authorises the High Court to exercise, in its discretion, any of the powers conferred on a court of appeal by section 423, sub-section (4) specifically excludes the power to convert a finding of acquittal into one. of conviction. \nThis does not mean that in dealing with a revision petition by a private party against an order of acquittal, the High Court could in the absence of any error on a point of law re-appraise the evidence and reverse the findings of facts on which the acquittal was based, provided only it stopped short of finding the accused guilty and passing sentence on him.\nBy merely characterising the judgment of the trial Court as perverse and lacking in perspective, the High Court cannot reverse pure findings of fact based on the trial Courts appreciation of the evidence in the case.", + "expert_2": "The Sessions Judge had completely misdirected himself in looking to the minor discrepancies in the case and ignoring the essential matters so far as the case is concerned, and there was no justifiable ground for rejecting the prosecution evidence regarding the cultivation and harvesting by Polai.\nthat sub-section (4) of section 439 clearly showed that the High Court exceeded its powers of revision in the present case in upsetting the findings of fact of the trial Judge.\njudgment summarised above that the learned Judge in the High Court re-appraised the evi- dence in the case and disagreed with the Sessions Judges findings of fact on the ground that they were perverse and displayed a lack of true perspective\nWe are of opinion that the learned Judge in the High Court did not properly appreciate the scope of inquiry in revision against an order of acquittal.\nsection 423, sub-section (4) specifically excludes the power to convert a finding of acquittal into one. of conviction.\ndealing with a revision petition by a private party against an order of acquittal, the High Court could in the absence of any error on a point of law re-appraise the evidence and reverse the findings of facts on which the acquittal was based, provided only it stopped short of finding the accused guilty and passing sentence on him.\ncharacterising the judgment of the trial Court as perverse and lacking in perspective, the High Court cannot reverse pure findings of fact based on the trial Courts appreciation of the evidence in the case.", + "expert_3": "This is an appeal by special leave from an order of the High Court of Judicature at Patna setting aside an order of acquittal of the appellants by the Sessions Judge, Purnea, and directing their retrial.\nThe appellants were prosecuted for alleged offences under sections 147, 148, 323, 324, 326, 302 and 302/149 of the Indian Penal Code at the instance of one Polai Lal Biswas who lodged a complaint against them before the po- lice.\nThe prosecution case was that, while the complainant was harvesting the paddy crop on his field at about 10 a.m. on 29th November, 1949, a mob of about fifty persons came on to the field armed with ballams, lathis and other weapons and that the first appellant Logendranath Jha, who was leading the mob, demanded a settlement of all outstanding disputes with the complainant and ,said he would not allow the paddy to be removed unless the disputes were settled. An altercation followed as a result of which Logendra or- dered an assault by his men\nThen Logendra and one of his men, Harihar, gave ballam blows to one of the labourers, Kangali, who fell down and died on the spot.\nInformation was given to the police who investigated the case and submitted the charge-sheet. The committing Magistrate found that a prima facie case was made out and committed the appellants to the Court of Sessions for trial\nThe appellants pleaded not guilty alleging inter alia, that Mohender and Debender, the brothers of Logendra (appel- lants 2 and 3) were not present in the village of Dandkhora with which they had no concern, as all the lands in that village had been allotted to Logendra at a previous parti- tion, that Logendra himself was not in the village at the time of the occurrence but arrived soon after and was dragged to the place at the instance of his enemies in the village and was placed under arrest by the Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police who had arrived there previously\nIt was also alleged that there were two factions in the village, one of which was led by one Harimohan, a relation of the complainant, and the other by Logendra and there had been numerous revenue and criminal proceedings and long-standing enmity between the families of these leaders as a result of which this false case was foisted upon the appellants. \n The learned Sessions Judge examined the evidence in great detail and found that the existence of factions as alleged by the appellants was true.\nHe found, however, that the appellants plea of alibi was not satisfactorily made out, but the truth of the prosecution, he proceeded to observe, cannot be judged by the falsehood of the defence nor can the prosecution derive its strength from the weak- ness of the defence.\nProsecution must stand on its own legs and must prove the story told by it at the very first stage. The manner of occurrence alleged by the prosecution must be established beyond doubt before the accused persons can be convicted\nApproaching the case in this manner and seeing that the basis of the prosecution case was that Polai had batai settlement of the disputed land and had raised the paddy crop which he was harvesting when the occurrence took place, the learned Sessions Judge examined the evidence of the prosecution witnesses who belonged to the opposite faction critically and found that the story of the prosecu- tion was not acceptable\nsaid the learned Judge, it does not appear to me to be probable that Polai would have been allowed to maintain himself by running adhi cultivation of his mamus land in the lifetime of his nani who has brought him up from his infancy like her own child. Nor does it appeal to me that the unmarried boy Polai would have undertaken upon himself the task of run- ning batai cultivation of the lands of his mamu where he has been living since his childhood without any trouble, more particularly in view of the heavy expenses of cultivation brought out by the evidence of Tirthanand\nThis false story, in his opinion, vitally affected the prosecution case regarding the alleged manner of the occurrence. He also found a number of discrepancies and contradictions in the evidence of the prosecution witnesses, which, in his view, tended to show that the prosecution was guilty of concealment of the real facts\nIn view of such conceal- ment of real facts, the learned Judge concluded, it does not appear to me to be possible to apportion liability and to decide which of the two parties commenced the fight and which acted in self-defence. Such being the position, it is not possible at all to hold either party responsible for what took place. In such a view of the matter coupled with the fact that the manner of occurrence alleged by the prose- cution has not been established to be true beyond doubt, I think that the accused persons cannot be safely convicted of any of the offences for which they have been charged. \nThe learned Judge accordingly acquitted the appellants of all the charges framed against them\nAgainst that order the complainant Polai preferred a revision petition to the High Court under section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code., The learned Judge who heard the petition reviewed the evidence at some length and came to the conclusion that the judgment of the learned Sessions Judge could not be allowed to stand as the acquittal of the appellants was perverse\nIn his opinion, the entire judgment displays a lack of true perspective in a case of this kind. The Sessions Judge had completely misdirected himself in looking to the minor discrepancies in the case and ignoring the essential matters so far as the case is concerned, and there was no justifiable ground for rejecting the prosecution evidence regarding the cultivation and harvesting by Polai\nOn behalf of the appellants Mr. Sinha raised two conten- tions\nsecondly, that sub-section (4) of section 439 clearly showed that the High Court exceeded its powers of revision in the present case in upsetting the findings of fact of the trial Judge\nwe are of opinion that his second and alternative contention must prevail.\nlearned Judge in the High Court re-appraised the evi- dence in the case and disagreed with the Sessions Judges findings of fact on the ground that they were perverse and displayed a lack of true perspective. \nHe went further and, by way of expressing in very clear terms as to how perverse the judgment of the court below is, he indicated that the discrepancies in the prosecution evidence and the circum- stances of the case which led the Sessions Judge to discred- it the prosecution story afforded no justifiable ground for the conclusion that the prosecution failed to establish their case.\nWe are of opinion that the learned Judge in the High Court did not properly appreciate the scope of inquiry in revision against an order of acquittal.\nThough sub-section(1) of section 439 authorises the High Court to exercise, in its discretion, any of the powers conferred on a court of appeal by section 423, sub-section (4) specifically excludes the power to convert a finding of acquittal into one. of conviction.\nBy merely characterising the judgment of the trial Court as perverse and lacking in perspective, the High Court cannot reverse pure findings of fact based on the trial Courts appreciation of the evidence in the case.", + "expert_4": "This is an appeal by special leave from an order of the High Court of Judicature at Patna setting aside an order of acquittal of the appellants by the Sessions Judge, Purnea, and directing their retrial.\nThe appellants were prosecuted for alleged offences under sections 147, 148, 323, 324, 326, 302 and 302/149 of the Indian Penal Code at the instance of one Polai Lal Biswas who lodged a complaint against them before the po- lice.\nThe prosecution case was that, while the complainant was harvesting the paddy crop on his field at about 10 a.m. on 29th November, 1949, a mob of about fifty persons came on to the field armed with ballams, lathis and other weapons and that the first appellant Logendranath Jha, who was leading the mob, demanded a settlement of all outstanding disputes with the complainant and ,said he would not allow the paddy to be removed unless the disputes were settled.\nAn altercation followed as a result of which Logendra or- dered an assault by his men.\nThen Logendra and one of his men, Harihar, gave ballam blows to one of the labourers, Kangali, who fell down and died on the spot.\nInformation was given to the police who investigated the case and submitted the charge-sheet.\nThe committing Magistrate found that a prima facie case was made out and committed the appellants to the Court of Sessions for trial.\nThe appellants pleaded not guilty alleging inter alia, that Mohender and Debender, the brothers of Logendra (appel- lants 2 and 3) were not present in the village of Dandkhora with which they had no concern, as all the lands in that village had been allotted to Logendra at a previous parti- tion, that Logendra himself was not in the village at the time of the occurrence but arrived soon after and was dragged to the place at the instance of his enemies in the village and was placed under arrest by the Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police who had arrived there previously.\nIt was also alleged that there were two factions in the village, one of which was led by one Harimohan, a relation of the complainant, and the other by Logendra and there had been numerous revenue and criminal proceedings and long-standing enmity between the families of these leaders as a result of which this false case was foisted upon the appellants.\nThe learned Sessions Judge examined the evidence in great detail and found that the existence of factions as alleged by the appellants was true.\nHe found, however, that the appellants plea of alibi was not satisfactorily made out, but the truth of the prosecution, he proceeded to observe, cannot be judged by the falsehood of the defence nor can the prosecution derive its strength from the weak- ness of the defence.\nProsecution must stand on its own legs and must prove the story told by it at the very first stage.\nThe manner of occurrence alleged by the prosecution must be established beyond doubt before the accused persons can be convicted.\nApproaching the case in this manner and seeing that the basis of the prosecution case was that Polai had batai settlement of the disputed land and had raised the paddy crop which he was harvesting when the occurrence took place, the learned Sessions Judge examined the evidence of the prosecution witnesses who belonged to the opposite faction critically and found that the story of the prosecu- tion was not acceptable.\nPolai, who was alleged to have taken the land on batai settlement from his own maternal grandmother Parasmani who brought him up from his childhood, was only 19 years old and unmarried and was still living with his grandmother.\nHe did not claim to be a bataidar of any other person.\nIn these circumstances, said the learned Judge, it does not appear to me to be probable that Polai would have been allowed to maintain himself by running adhi cultivation of his mamus land in the lifetime of his nani who has brought him up from his infancy like her own child.\nNor does it appeal to me that the unmarried boy Polai would have undertaken upon himself the task of run- ning batai cultivation of the lands of his mamu where he has been living since his childhood without any trouble, more particularly in view of the heavy expenses of cultivation brought out by the evidence of Tirthanand (P.W. 14).\nHe, therefore, disbelieved the whole story that Polai had taken the lands of his grandmother or his uncles as bataidar for cultivation and that he was engaged in harvesting the paddy crop on the lands at the time of the occurrence.\nThis false story, in his opinion, vitally affected the prosecution case regarding the alleged manner of the occurrence.\nHe also found a number of discrepancies and contradictions in the evidence of the prosecution witnesses, which, in his view, tended to show that the prosecution was guilty of concealment of the real facts.\nIn view of such conceal- ment of real facts, the learned Judge concluded, it does not appear to me to be possible to apportion liability and to decide which of the two parties commenced the fight and which acted in self-defence.\nSuch being the position, it is not possible at all to hold either party responsible for what took place.\nIn such a view of the matter coupled with the fact that the manner of occurrence alleged by the prose- cution has not been established to be true beyond doubt, I think that the accused persons cannot be safely convicted of any of the offences for which they have been charged.\nThe learned Judge accordingly acquitted the appellants of all the charges framed against them.\nAgainst that order the complainant Polai preferred a revision petition to the High Court under section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code., The learned Judge who heard the petition reviewed the evidence at some length and came to the conclusion that the judgment of the learned Sessions Judge could not be allowed to stand as the acquittal of the appellants was perverse .\nIn his opinion, the entire judgment displays a lack of true perspective in a case of this kind.\nThe Sessions Judge had completely misdirected himself in looking to the minor discrepancies in the case and ignoring the essential matters so far as the case is concerned, and there was no justifiable ground for rejecting the prosecution evidence regarding the cultivation and harvesting by Polai.\nAnd he concluded with the warning I would, however, make it per- fectly clear that when the case is re-tried, which I am now going to order, the Judge proceeding with the trial will not be in the least influenced by any expression of opinion which I may have given in this judgment.\nOn behalf of the appellants Mr. Sinha raised two conten- tions.\nIn the first place, he submitted that having regard to section 417 of the Criminal Procedure Code which provides for an appeal to the High Court from an order of acquittal only at the instance of the Government, a revision petition under section 439 at the instance of a private party was incompetent, and, secondly, that sub-section (4) of section 439 clearly showed that the High Court exceeded its powers of revision in the present case in upsetting the findings of fact of the trial Judge.\nWe think it is unnecessary to express any opinion on the first contention of Mr. Sinha especially as the respondent is unrepresented, as we are of opinion that his second and alternative contention must prevail.\nIt will be seen from the judgment summarised above that the learned Judge in the High Court re-appraised the evi- dence in the case and disagreed with the Sessions Judges findings of fact on the ground that they were perverse and displayed a lack of true perspective.\nHe went further and, by way of expressing in very clear terms as to how perverse the judgment of the court below is, he indicated that the discrepancies in the prosecution evidence and the circum- stances of the case which led the Sessions Judge to discred- it the prosecution story afforded no justifiable ground for the conclusion that the prosecution failed to establish their case.\nWe are of opinion that the learned Judge in the High Court did not properly appreciate the scope of inquiry in revision against an order of acquittal.\nThough sub-section(1) of section 439 authorises the High Court to exercise, in its discretion, any of the powers conferred on a court of appeal by section 423, sub-section (4) specifically excludes the power to convert a finding of acquittal into one. of conviction.\nThis does not mean that in dealing with a revision petition by a private party against an order of acquittal, the High Court could in the absence of any error on a point of law re-appraise the evidence and reverse the findings of facts on which the acquittal was based, provided only it stopped short of finding the accused guilty and passing sentence on him.\nBy merely characterising the judgment of the trial Court as perverse and lacking in perspective, the High Court cannot reverse pure findings of fact based on the trial Courts appreciation of the evidence in the case.", + "expert_5": "Against that order the complainant Polai preferred a revision petition to the High Court under section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code.\nthat sub-section (4) of section 439 clearly showed that the High Court exceeded its powers of revision in the present case in upsetting the findings of fact of the trial Judge.\nWe are of opinion that the learned Judge in the High Court did not properly appreciate the scope of inquiry in revision against an order of acquittal.\nThough sub-section(1) of section 439 authorises the High Court to exercise, in its discretion, any of the powers conferred on a court of appeal by section 423, sub-section (4) specifically excludes the power to convert a finding of acquittal into one. of conviction.\nBy merely characterising the judgment of the trial Court as perverse and lacking in perspective, the High Court cannot reverse pure findings of fact based on the trial Courts appreciation of the evidence in the case." + }, + "1951_33": { + "expert_1": "The circumstances under which this question and several subsidiary questions to which reference will be made later have arisen may be briefly stated as follows \n The Province of Bengal, (hereinafter referred to as the respondent No. 1 or plaintiff) is admittedly the owner of an area of 1125 bighas and odd of land in village Akra. On the 17th February, 1928, the respondent No. 1 executed a lease (exhibit 3) in respect of the said land for 10 years for manufacture of bricks in favour of the appellant, at a rental of Rs. 6,000 a year. The lease was to commence from the 24th February, 1928, and a years rent was payable in advance. By the terms of the said lease, the lessee was prohibited from assigning or subletting the premises or any part thereof without the consent of the lessor except to a limited company and the lease also contained a general provision that the lessee would at the expiration of the lease restore to the lessor the demised premises in as good condition as it was at the date of the lease, reasonable wear and tear excepted.\nThe case of the respondent No. 1, who is the plaintiff in the present litigation, is that the appellant (defendant No. 1) had, in contravention of the terms of the lease, sublet the brickfield to defendants-respondents 2 to 18 without the consent of respondent No. 1, and they had caused serious damage to the brickfield in general and failed to maintain the embankments, sluices, etc. in proper repair resulting in a total loss of Rs. 16,840. It was further alleged that the defendants had refused to deliver possession though the lease had terminated, and they had not removed the bricks, pugmills and other materials within 3 months from the termination of the lease. On these allegations, the respondent No. 1 prayed for the following reliefs - \n (a) a decree for ejectment and khas possession over the brickfield \n (b) damages amounting to Rs. 4,000 for the period between the termination of the lease and institution of the suit and mesne profits for the subsequent period \n (c) a decree for Rs. 16,840 for damages caused to the field and \n (d) a decree for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from removing or otherwise disposing of the bricks, pugmils, etc. which were claimed to have become the property of the plaintiff.\nThe suit was contested by the appellants, and the other defendants, and their defence was that the appellants had held over with the implied consent of respondent No. 1, and hence the lease had not validly terminated, that no damage or injury had been caused to the land, that the respondent No. 1 was not entitled to forfeit the properties of the appellants lying in the brickfield inasmuch as the term in the lease to that effect was by way of penalty and as such unenforceable, and that the respondent No. 1 was not entitled to the relief of injunction. The trial Judge by his judgment dated the 24th November, 1941, held that there was no holding over with the assent of the plaintiff and both parties were under a mistaken belief that the lease had expired on the 23rd February, 1938. He however held that the evidence did not show that there was any damage or injury caused to the property. \n On these findings, the suit was decreed in part, and the respondent No. 1 was directed to be put in possession of the brickfield and was also granted a decree for Rs. 4,000 as mesne profits up to the date on which the respondent No. 1 was put in possession. The prayer for damages for injury alleged to have been caused to the field and the prayer for injunction were however disallowed. The trial Judge allowed the appellants 3 months time to remove their belongings from the Akra brickfield including kilns, pugmills, bricks, coals and any other brick-making material that may be lying there after this period these properties, if any, left in the field. Were to become the absolute properties of the plaintiff. The appellants thereafter preferred an appeal to the High Court at Calcutta, and the respondent No. 1 also preferred a cross-objection claiming that the prayer for injunction should have been allowed and the claim for damages should have been decreed in full. The learned Judges of the High Court who heard the appeal, by their judgment dated the 13th February, 1948, dismissed the appellants appeal and allowed the cross-objection of the respondent No. 1 in part. They held that on the facts established in the case there was no holding over, and that the clause in the lease stating that if the appellants did not remove the bricks etc. from the field within 3 months after the termination of the lease they would become the property of respondent No. 1, was not a clause by way of penalty and should be given effect to. They further held that the claim of respondent No. 1 for damages for injury caused to the demised premises was not established. The present appeal is directed against the judgment of the High Court.\nThe term of lease expires on the afternoon of the 23rd February, 1938. Apart from the fact that the appellants did not set up in any of their letters a case of holding over, we have to see whether the plea can be said to have been successfully made out by them. There is no doubt that the appellants have established that the rent was paid on their behalf up to the 31st March, 1938, and it was accepted by the respondent No. 1.\nIt has also been established that this payment was made by a cheque and that cheque has been cashed by the Government. Section 116 of the Transfer of Property Act, on which reliance was placed on behalf of the appellants, runs as follows - If a lessee or underlessee of property remains in possession thereof after the determination of the lease granted to the lessee, and the lessor or his legal representative accepts rent from the lessee or under-lessee, or otherwise assents to his continuing in possession, the lease is, in the absence of an agreement to the contrary, renewed from year to year, or from month to month, according to the purpose for which the property is leased \n This section was construed by the Federal Court in K. B. Capadia v. Bai Jerbai Warden and Another 1959 F.C.R. 262, and it was held that where rent was accepted by the landlord after the expiration of the tenancy by efflux of time, section 116 applied even though the landlord accepted the amount remitted to him as part deposit towards his claim for compensation for illegal use and occupation, and without prejudice to his rights. It is to be noted that in that case rent had been accepted after the expiry of the tenancy.\nIn our judgment, the present case cannot be governed by that decision, because of the fact, which in our opinion is important that here the payment of rent up to the 31st March, 1938, was made not after the date of expiry of the lease, but on the 5th April, 1937, nearly a year before the expiry of the lease.\nBoth the courts below, after dealing with the matter elaborately, have concurrently held that in the circumstances of the case the consent of respondent No. 1 to the appellants continuing in possession cannot be inferred, and we agree with this finding.\nBut it seems to us that the very fact, that the payment was made at a time when there was no question of the lessor assenting to the lessees continuing in possession and neither party treated the payment as importing such assent, is sufficient to take the case out of the mischief of section 116 of the Transfer of Property Act.\nAs we have seen the rent for the first year was paid in advance near about the time of the execution of the lease, and nothing turns upon it. When however the second payment was made, the sum paid was Rs. 6,714 and odd, and the payment was made in respect of rent up to the 31st March, 1930. After this, all the subsequent payments were made up to the 31st March of the succeeding year, evidently because the financial year, which the parties considered themselves to be governed by, ran from the 1st April to the 31st March of the succeeding year. It was presumably in view of this fact that the plaintiff filed an application on the 6th November, 1941, for amending the plaint so as to include the following statement - The plaintiff submits that even assuming that the registered lease terminated on the 23rd February, 1938, by an agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant No. 1, the latter was allowed to hold over up to the 31st March, 1938. \n This application however was rejected, because it was made at a very late stage, that is to say, after the defendants evidence had been closed and an adjournment had been granted to the plaintiff to adduce rebutting evidence\nHowever that may be, the utmost that can be said upon the evidence as it stands is that by the implied consent of the parties the period of the lease was extended up to the 31st March, 1938. In this view, the respondent No. 1 became entitled to re-enter after the 31st March, and no notice under section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act was necessary\nIn the circumstances, the decree for ejectment passed by the courts below must be upheld.\nThe next question which arises in the case turns on the proper construction of clause 11 of Part I and clause 1 of Part III of the lease, which have already been quoted. It seems to us that clause 11 should be read as a whole, and, when it is so read, it becomes clear that it was intended to be applicable only where the Secretary of State decided to exercise his right to terminate the lease at any time subject to 6 months notice, in the event of the lessee failing to observe and duly perform the conditions mentioned in the lease. In such a case, if the lessee did not remove the boilers, engines and all other materials and yield up the premises to the Secretary of State, those articles were to become the property of the Secretary of State. This clause is evidently not applicable to the present case. The clause which applies to this case is clause 1 of Part III, which is intended to be applicable to the normal case of the lease expiring by efflux of time. This clause, as we have seen, provides that the lessee shall be at liberty to keep on the demised premises for 3 months after the expiration of the lease any bricks, boilers, etc., but it also provides that any bricks and other materials left in contravention of this condition shall become the absolute property of the Secretary of State without payment.\nThere can be no doubt that under this clause, the bricks and other materials have become the absolute property of the plaintiff.\nThe only question is as to the meaning of other materials. It seems to us on an examination of the lease as a whole that there must be a distinction between materials, and machinery and tools and similar articles, and the words other materials have no reference to engines, trucks, railway and tramway lines and plant. They mean building materials such as bricks, tiles and similar articles that might have been manufactured by the appellants on the demised premises. That being so, the decree under appeal should be modified accordingly.\nThe only other point which arises for consideration relates to the plaintiffs prayer for a decree for permanent injunction against the defendants, to restrain them from removing or otherwise disposing of the articles in regard to which the decree is to be passed.\nIt was contended on behalf of the appellants that the respondent No. 1 not being in possession of these properties could not ask for the relief of injunction without asking for the declaration of its title in respect of them and possession over them, and in support of this proposition, the following cases were cited - Ratnasabhapathi Pillai and Others v. Ramaswami Aiyar I.L.R. 33 Mad. 482, Bhramar Lal Banduri and Others v. Nanda Lal Chowdhuri 24 I.C. 199 and Valia Tamburatti v. Parvati and Others I.L.R. 13 Mad. 455. After reading and fully considering those cases, we find them to be wholly inapplicable to the present case\nIn the present case, it has been found that the bricks and other materials have become the property of the plaintiff, and there can be no legal objection to the granting of an injunction as prayed.", + "expert_2": "The principal question for determination in this appeal is whether a certain lease had validly terminated by efflux of time or whether there was holding over by the lessee of the leasehold property as contemplated in section 116 of the Transfer of Property Act.\nEven in the letter which was written on behalf of the appellants on the 3rd March, 1938, after the expiry of the date on which the lease was to terminate, the statement made in the earlier letters was repeated, and it was further stated we applied for renewal of the lease on the 23rd August, 1937, six months prior to the date of expiration of the lease. In this letter, it is nowhere suggested that the appellants were holding over by reason of the acceptance of rent up to the 31st March, 1938. On the other hand, at the end of this letter, we find the following statement - We therefore pray that if the Government is not at all inclined to renew the lease, time may be granted to us for dismantling and removing till the end of December, 1938, and we shall pay the proportional rent to the Government for seven months time in pursuance of the terms of the lease.\nApart from the fact that the appellants did not set up in any of their letters a case of holding over, we have to see whether the plea can be said to have been successfully made out by them. There is no doubt that the appellants have established that the rent was paid on their behalf up to the 31st March, 1938, and it was accepted by the respondent No. 1. It has also been established that this payment was made by a cheque and that cheque has been cashed by the Government\nA reference to section 116 of the Transfer of Property Act will show that for the application of that section, two things are necessary - (1) the lessee should be in possession after the termination of the lease and (2) the lessor or his representative should accept rent or otherwise assent to his continuing in possession. The use of the word otherwise suggests that acceptance of rent by the landlords has been treated as a form of his giving assent to the tenants continuance of possession. There can be no question of the lessee continuing in possession until the lease has expired, and the context in which the provision for acceptance of rent finds a place clearly shows that what is contemplated is that the payment of rent and its acceptance should be made at such a time and in such a manner as to be equivalent to the landlord assenting to the lessee continuing in possession.\nthat the payment was made at a time when there was no question of the lessor assenting to the lessees continuing in possession and neither party treated the payment as importing such assent, is sufficient to take the case out of the mischief of section 116 of the Transfer of Property Act.\nThe clause which applies to this case is clause 1 of Part III, which is intended to be applicable to the normal case of the lease expiring by efflux of time. This clause, as we have seen, provides that the lessee shall be at liberty to keep on the demised premises for 3 months after the expiration of the lease any bricks, boilers, etc., but it also provides that any bricks and other materials left in contravention of this condition shall become the absolute property of the Secretary of State without payment. There can be no doubt that under this clause, the bricks and other materials have become the absolute property of the plaintiff.\nIt seems to us on an examination of the lease as a whole that there must be a distinction between materials, and machinery and tools and similar articles, and the words other materials have no reference to engines, trucks, railway and tramway lines and plant. They mean building materials such as bricks, tiles and similar articles that might have been manufactured by the appellants on the demised premises.", + "expert_3": "The principal question for determination in this appeal is whether a certain lease had validly terminated by efflux of time or whether there was holding over by the lessee of the leasehold property as contemplated in section 116 of the Transfer of Property Act.\nThe Province of Bengal, (hereinafter referred to as the respondent No. 1 or plaintiff) is admittedly the owner of an area of 1125 bighas and odd of land in village Akra. On the 17th February, 1928, the respondent No. 1 executed a lease (exhibit 3) in respect of the said land for 10 years for manufacture of bricks in favour of the appellant, at a rental of Rs. 6,000 a year. The lease was to commence from the 24th February, 1928, and a years rent was payable in advance\nBy the terms of the said lease, the lessee was prohibited from assigning or subletting the premises or any part thereof without the consent of the lessor except to a limited company and the lease also contained a general provision that the lessee would at the expiration of the lease restore to the lessor the demised premises in as good condition as it was at the date of the lease, reasonable wear and tear excepted.\nThe Secretary of State reserves the right to terminate the lease at any time subject to six months notice in the event of the lessees failing to observe and duly perform the conditions hereinbefore and after mentioned and it is hereby agreed that the lessee shall before the expiration or prior termination of the lease hereby granted remove his boilers engines trucks kilns railway and tram lines bricks tools and plant and all other materials whatsoever and yield up the said demised premises unto the Secretary of State and that those bricks tools and plant and other materials that shall not be removed before such expiration or prior termination shall become the property of the Secretary of State\nThe lessee shall be at liberty to keep on the said premises hereby demised for three months after the expiration or prior termination of the term of this lease any bricks boilers engines trucks kilns railway and tram lines and all other materials whatsoever as may have been manufactured by him in the premises in accordance with the conditions of these presents but any bricks and other materials left in contravention to this condition shall become the absolute property of the Secretary of State without payment\nThe case of the respondent No. 1, who is the plaintiff in the present litigation, is that the appellant (defendant No. 1) had, in contravention of the terms of the lease, sublet the brickfield to defendants-respondents 2 to 18 without the consent of respondent No. 1, and they had caused serious damage to the brickfield in general and failed to maintain the embankments, sluices, etc. in proper repair resulting in a total loss of Rs. 16,840. It was further alleged that the defendants had refused to deliver possession though the lease had terminated, and they had not removed the bricks, pugmills and other materials within 3 months from the termination of the lease.\nOn these allegations, the respondent No. 1 prayed for the following reliefs - \n (a) a decree for ejectment and khas possession over the brickfield \n (b) damages amounting to Rs. 4,000 for the period between the termination of the lease and institution of the suit and mesne profits for the subsequent period \n (c) a decree for Rs. 16,840 for damages caused to the field and \n (d) a decree for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from removing or otherwise disposing of the bricks, pugmils, etc. which were claimed to have become the property of the plaintiff\nThe suit was contested by the appellants, and the other defendants, and their defence was that the appellants had held over with the implied consent of respondent No. 1, and hence the lease had not validly terminated, that no damage or injury had been caused to the land, that the respondent No. 1 was not entitled to forfeit the properties of the appellants lying in the brickfield inasmuch as the term in the lease to that effect was by way of penalty and as such unenforceable, and that the respondent No. 1 was not entitled to the relief of injunction. The trial Judge by his judgment dated the 24th November, 1941, held that there was no holding over with the assent of the plaintiff and both parties were under a mistaken belief that the lease had expired on the 23rd February, 1938.\nHe however held that the evidence did not show that there was any damage or injury caused to the property. \n On these findings, the suit was decreed in part, and the respondent No. 1 was directed to be put in possession of the brickfield and was also granted a decree for Rs. 4,000 as mesne profits up to the date on which the respondent No. 1 was put in possession. The prayer for damages for injury alleged to have been caused to the field and the prayer for injunction were however disallowed\nThe appellants thereafter preferred an appeal to the High Court at Calcutta, and the respondent No. 1 also preferred a cross-objection claiming that the prayer for injunction should have been allowed and the claim for damages should have been decreed in full. The learned Judges of the High Court who heard the appeal, by their judgment dated the 13th February, 1948, dismissed the appellants appeal and allowed the cross-objection of the respondent No. 1 in part. They held that on the facts established in the case there was no holding over, and that the clause in the lease stating that if the appellants did not remove the bricks etc. from the field within 3 months after the termination of the lease they would become the property of respondent No. 1, was not a clause by way of penalty and should be given effect to. They further held that the claim of respondent No. 1 for damages for injury caused to the demised premises was not established. The present appeal is directed against the judgment of the High Court.\nOn the 27th August, 1937, the appellants applied to the Secretary to the Government of Bengal, Public Works Department, for renewing the lease for a further period of 10 years, but no reply was received to that letter. After addressing several other letters, the appellants received a letter dated the 23rd February, 1938, with which was enclosed a copy of an extract from a letter addressed by the Executive Engineer, Suburban Division to the Assistant Engineer, No. III Sub-division, which was as under - He is requested to make arrangements with Messrs. \n Karnani Industrial Bank Limited for vacant possession of the Akra brickfield on the 24th instant as the lease with the Bank will expire on the 23rd instant according to the terms of the agreement. Ultimately, on the 17th March, 1938, the appellants received the following communication from the Excecutive Engineer, Suburban Division - I would inform you that it is not the intention of Government in this Department to lease out the brickfields and arrangement is being accordingly made to make over the lands to the Government in the Revenue Department for disposal.\nIn a subsequent letter dated the 14th September, 1938, the Executive Engineer wrote to the appellants as follows - I am instructed to state that Government have decided that you cannot be allowed to continue in occupation of the premises any further However, as a matter of grace Government will allow you time till the 30th day of September next, to dismantle the kilns and to remove all your bricks, boiler etc. from the site, on which date Government will take over possession of the property from you. The correspondence to which reference has been made does not show that at any point of time the plaintiff had assented to the appellants continuance of possession\nOn the other hand, some of the letters written by the appellants show that, notwithstanding their having paid rent up to the 31st March, 1938, they had proceeded all along on the footing that the lease was to expire in February, 1938\nFor instance, in the appellants letter of the 23rd August, 1937, it is stated we are desirous of renewing the lease of the brickfield for a further period of 10 years from the date of the expiration of the period of the lease dated 17-2-1928. Again, in the letter dated the 23rd October, 1937, reference is made to the appellants application for renewal of the lease for a further period of 10 years on its expiry.\nEven in the letter which was written on behalf of the appellants on the 3rd March, 1938, after the expiry of the date on which the lease was to terminate, the statement made in the earlier letters was repeated, and it was further stated we applied for renewal of the lease on the 23rd August, 1937, six months prior to the date of expiration of the lease. In this letter, it is nowhere suggested that the appellants were holding over by reason of the acceptance of rent up to the 31st March, 1938.\nat the end of this letter, we find the following statement - We therefore pray that if the Government is not at all inclined to renew the lease, time may be granted to us for dismantling and removing till the end of December, 1938, and we shall pay the proportional rent to the Government for seven months time in pursuance of the terms of the lease.\nThe reference to the period of 7 months shows that it was assumed that the lease had expired in February, 1938. The letters written on behalf of the Government point to the same conclusion, namely, that both the parties were acting on the assumption that the lease was to expire on the 23rd February, 1938\nFor instance in a letter written on behalf of the Government on the 25th February, 1938, the following statement is made - I have the honour to inform you that none of your agents was present at the Akra brickfield today as previously arranged to make over the possession of the brickfields. You are therefore requested to please inform me about as to what arrangements are being made by you to make over the possession of the said brickfield to this department. The term of lease expires on the afternoon of the 23rd February, 1938\nApart from the fact that the appellants did not set up in any of their letters a case of holding over, we have to see whether the plea can be said to have been successfully made out by them.\nThere is no doubt that the appellants have established that the rent was paid on their behalf up to the 31st March, 1938, and it was accepted by the respondent No. 1. It has also been established that this payment was made by a cheque and that cheque has been cashed by the Government\nSection 116 of the Transfer of Property Act, on which reliance was placed on behalf of the appellants, runs as follows - If a lessee or underlessee of property remains in possession thereof after the determination of the lease granted to the lessee, and the lessor or his legal representative accepts rent from the lessee or under-lessee, or otherwise assents to his continuing in possession, the lease is, in the absence of an agreement to the contrary, renewed from year to year, or from month to month, according to the purpose for which the property is leased\nit was held that where rent was accepted by the landlord after the expiration of the tenancy by efflux of time, section 116 applied even though the landlord accepted the amount remitted to him as part deposit towards his claim for compensation for illegal use and occupation, and without prejudice to his rights.\nIn our judgment, the present case cannot be governed by that decision, because of the fact, which in our opinion is important that here the payment of rent up to the 31st March, 1938, was made not after the date of expiry of the lease, but on the 5th April, 1937, nearly a year before the expiry of the lease\nA reference to section 116 of the Transfer of Property Act will show that for the application of that section, two things are necessary - (1) the lessee should be in possession after the termination of the lease and (2) the lessor or his representative should accept rent or otherwise assent to his continuing in possession. The use of the word otherwise suggests that acceptance of rent by the landlords has been treated as a form of his giving assent to the tenants continuance of possession\nThere can be no question of the lessee continuing in possession until the lease has expired, and the context in which the provision for acceptance of rent finds a place clearly shows that what is contemplated is that the payment of rent and its acceptance should be made at such a time and in such a manner as to be equivalent to the landlord assenting to the lessee continuing in possession\nBoth the courts below, after dealing with the matter elaborately, have concurrently held that in the circumstances of the case the consent of respondent No. 1 to the appellants continuing in possession cannot be inferred, and we agree with this finding.\nBut it seems to us that the very fact, that the payment was made at a time when there was no question of the lessor assenting to the lessees continuing in possession and neither party treated the payment as importing such assent, is sufficient to take the case out of the mischief of section 116 of the Transfer of Property Act\nthe utmost that can be said upon the evidence as it stands is that by the implied consent of the parties the period of the lease was extended up to the 31st March, 1938. In this view, the respondent No. 1 became entitled to re-enter after the 31st March, and no notice under section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act was necessary. In the circumstances, the decree for ejectment passed by the courts below must be upheld\nThe next question which arises in the case turns on the proper construction of clause 11 of Part I and clause 1 of Part III of the lease, which have already been quoted. It seems to us that clause 11 should be read as a whole, and, when it is so read, it becomes clear that it was intended to be applicable only where the Secretary of State decided to exercise his right to terminate the lease at any time subject to 6 months notice, in the event of the lessee failing to observe and duly perform the conditions mentioned in the lease\nIn such a case, if the lessee did not remove the boilers, engines and all other materials and yield up the premises to the Secretary of State, those articles were to become the property of the Secretary of State\nThis clause is evidently not applicable to the present case. The clause which applies to this case is clause 1 of Part III, which is intended to be applicable to the normal case of the lease expiring by efflux of time.\nThis clause, as we have seen, provides that the lessee shall be at liberty to keep on the demised premises for 3 months after the expiration of the lease any bricks, boilers, etc., but it also provides that any bricks and other materials left in contravention of this condition shall become the absolute property of the Secretary of State without payment.\nThere can be no doubt that under this clause, the bricks and other materials have become the absolute property of the plaintiff. \n The only question is as to the meaning of other materials\nIt seems to us on an examination of the lease as a whole that there must be a distinction between materials, and machinery and tools and similar articles, and the words other materials have no reference to engines, trucks, railway and tramway lines and plant.\nThey mean building materials such as bricks, tiles and similar articles that might have been manufactured by the appellants on the demised premises. That being so, the decree under appeal should be modified accordingly\nThe only other point which arises for consideration relates to the plaintiffs prayer for a decree for permanent injunction against the defendants, to restrain them from removing or otherwise disposing of the articles in regard to which the decree is to be passed.\nIn the present case, it has been found that the bricks and other materials have become the property of the plaintiff, and there can be no legal objection to the granting of an injunction as prayed.", + "expert_4": "The principal question for determination in this appeal is whether a certain lease had validly terminated by efflux of time or whether there was holding over by the lessee of the leasehold property as contemplated in section 116 of the Transfer of Property Act.\nThe circumstances under which this question and several subsidiary questions to which reference will be made later have arisen may be briefly stated as follows \n The Province of Bengal, (hereinafter referred to as the respondent No. 1 or plaintiff) is admittedly the owner of an area of 1125 bighas and odd of land in village Akra.\nOn the 17th February, 1928, the respondent No. 1 executed a lease (exhibit 3) in respect of the said land for 10 years for manufacture of bricks in favour of the appellant, at a rental of Rs. 6,000 a year. The lease was to commence from the 24th February, 1928, and a years rent was payable in advance. By the terms of the said lease, the lessee was prohibited from assigning or subletting the premises or any part thereof without the consent of the lessor except to a limited company and the lease also contained a general provision that the lessee would at the expiration of the lease restore to the lessor the demised premises in as good condition as it was at the date of the lease, reasonable wear and tear excepted.\nTwo further clauses in the lease, which are material for the decision of this appeal, may be reproduced verbatim - \n Clause 11 of Part I of the Schedule.\nThe Secretary of State reserves the right to terminate the lease at any time subject to six months notice in the event of the lessees failing to observe and duly perform the conditions hereinbefore and after mentioned and it is hereby agreed that the lessee shall before the expiration or prior termination of the lease hereby granted remove his boilers engines trucks kilns railway and tram lines bricks tools and plant and all other materials whatsoever and yield up the said demised premises unto the Secretary of State and that those bricks tools and plant and other materials that shall not be removed before such expiration or prior termination shall become the property of the Secretary of State.\nClause 1 of Part III of the Schedule. The lessee shall be at liberty to keep on the said premises hereby demised for three months after the expiration or prior termination of the term of this lease any bricks boilers engines trucks kilns railway and tram lines and all other materials whatsoever as may have been manufactured by him in the premises in accordance with the conditions of these presents but any bricks and other materials left in contravention to this condition shall become the absolute property of the Secretary of State without payment.\nIt may be stated here that at the time of the execution of the lease, the lessee had purchased from the lessor for Rs. 50,000 all the boilers, engines, trucks, kilns, railway and tramway lines and all other movable property, plant and machinery on the demised premises.\nThe case of the respondent No. 1, who is the plaintiff in the present litigation, is that the appellant (defendant No. 1) had, in contravention of the terms of the lease, sublet the brickfield to defendants-respondents 2 to 18 without the consent of respondent No. 1, and they had caused serious damage to the brickfield in general and failed to maintain the embankments, sluices, etc. in proper repair resulting in a total loss of Rs. 16,840.\nIt was further alleged that the defendants had refused to deliver possession though the lease had terminated, and they had not removed the bricks, pugmills and other materials within 3 months from the termination of the lease.\nOn these allegations, the respondent No. 1 prayed for the following reliefs - \n (a) a decree for ejectment and khas possession over the brickfield \n (b) damages amounting to Rs. 4,000 for the period between the termination of the lease and institution of the suit and mesne profits for the subsequent period \n (c) a decree for Rs. 16,840 for damages caused to the field and \n (d) a decree for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from removing or otherwise disposing of the bricks, pugmils, etc. which were claimed to have become the property of the plaintiff.\nThe suit was contested by the appellants, and the other defendants, and their defence was that the appellants had held over with the implied consent of respondent No. 1, and hence the lease had not validly terminated, that no damage or injury had been caused to the land, that the respondent No. 1 was not entitled to forfeit the properties of the appellants lying in the brickfield inasmuch as the term in the lease to that effect was by way of penalty and as such unenforceable, and that the respondent No. 1 was not entitled to the relief of injunction.\nThe trial Judge by his judgment dated the 24th November, 1941, held that there was no holding over with the assent of the plaintiff and both parties were under a mistaken belief that the lease had expired on the 23rd February, 1938.\nHe however held that the evidence did not show that there was any damage or injury caused to the property.\nOn these findings, the suit was decreed in part, and the respondent No. 1 was directed to be put in possession of the brickfield and was also granted a decree for Rs. 4,000 as mesne profits up to the date on which the respondent No. 1 was put in possession.\nThe prayer for damages for injury alleged to have been caused to the field and the prayer for injunction were however disallowed.\nThe trial Judge allowed the appellants 3 months time to remove their belongings from the Akra brickfield including kilns, pugmills, bricks, coals and any other brick-making material that may be lying there after this period these properties, if any, left in the field.\nWere to become the absolute properties of the plaintiff.\nThe appellants thereafter preferred an appeal to the High Court at Calcutta, and the respondent No. 1 also preferred a cross-objection claiming that the prayer for injunction should have been allowed and the claim for damages should have been decreed in full.\nThe learned Judges of the High Court who heard the appeal, by their judgment dated the 13th February, 1948, dismissed the appellants appeal and allowed the cross-objection of the respondent No. 1 in part.\nThey held that on the facts established in the case there was no holding over, and that the clause in the lease stating that if the appellants did not remove the bricks etc. from the field within 3 months after the termination of the lease they would become the property of respondent No. 1, was not a clause by way of penalty and should be given effect to.\nThey further held that the claim of respondent No. 1 for damages for injury caused to the demised premises was not established.\nThe present appeal is directed against the judgment of the High Court.\nThe admitted facts of the case are briefly these. The appellants duly paid Rs. 6,000 as rent to respondent No. 1 in February, 1928. In February, 1929, a sum of Rs. 6,714 and odd was paid by the appellants as rent for the period 17th February, 1929, to the 31st March, 1930, and thereafter they continued to pay Rs. 6,000 as rent for the yearly period, 1st April to 31st March of the succeeding year, and the last payment was made in April, 1937, by means of a cheque sent with a covering letter, the material portion of which runs as follows - We beg to enclose herewith a cheque for Rs. 6,000 in payment of rent Akra brickfield for the year 1937-38 ending 31st March, 1938, and shall thank you to please favour us with your formal receipt for the above.\nThe cheque was duly cashed and the amount was entered in the cash book of the plaintiff in the following terms - 5-4-37 (date of receipt).\nReceived without prejudice from Karnani Industrial Bank Ltd. on account of yearly rent for Akra brickfield for the year ending 31st March, 1938.\nOn the 27th August, 1937, the appellants applied to the Secretary to the Government of Bengal, Public Works Department, for renewing the lease for a further period of 10 years, but no reply was received to that letter.\nAfter addressing several other letters, the appellants received a letter dated the 23rd February, 1938, with which was enclosed a copy of an extract from a letter addressed by the Executive Engineer, Suburban Division to the Assistant Engineer, No. III Sub-division, which was as under - He is requested to make arrangements with Messrs. \n Karnani Industrial Bank Limited for vacant possession of the Akra brickfield on the 24th instant as the lease with the Bank will expire on the 23rd instant according to the terms of the agreement.\nUltimately, on the 17th March, 1938, the appellants received the following communication from the Excecutive Engineer, Suburban Division - I would inform you that it is not the intention of Government in this Department to lease out the brickfields and arrangement is being accordingly made to make over the lands to the Government in the Revenue Department for disposal.\nIn a subsequent letter dated the 14th September, 1938, the Executive Engineer wrote to the appellants as follows - I am instructed to state that Government have decided that you cannot be allowed to continue in occupation of the premises any further However, as a matter of grace Government will allow you time till the 30th day of September next, to dismantle the kilns and to remove all your bricks, boiler etc. from the site, on which date Government will take over possession of the property from you.\nThe correspondence to which reference has been made does not show that at any point of time the plaintiff had assented to the appellants continuance of possession.\nOn the other hand, some of the letters written by the appellants show that, notwithstanding their having paid rent up to the 31st March, 1938, they had proceeded all along on the footing that the lease was to expire in February, 1938.\nFor instance, in the appellants letter of the 23rd August, 1937, it is stated we are desirous of renewing the lease of the brickfield for a further period of 10 years from the date of the expiration of the period of the lease dated 17-2-1928.\nAgain, in the letter dated the 23rd October, 1937, reference is made to the appellants application for renewal of the lease for a further period of 10 years on its expiry.\nEven in the letter which was written on behalf of the appellants on the 3rd March, 1938, after the expiry of the date on which the lease was to terminate, the statement made in the earlier letters was repeated, and it was further stated we applied for renewal of the lease on the 23rd August, 1937, six months prior to the date of expiration of the lease.\nit is nowhere suggested that the appellants were holding over by reason of the acceptance of rent up to the 31st March, 1938.\nOn the other hand, at the end of this letter, we find the following statement - We therefore pray that if the Government is not at all inclined to renew the lease, time may be granted to us for dismantling and removing till the end of December, 1938, and we shall pay the proportional rent to the Government for seven months time in pursuance of the terms of the lease.\nThe reference to the period of 7 months shows that it was assumed that the lease had expired in February, 1938.\nThe letters written on behalf of the Government point to the same conclusion, namely, that both the parties were acting on the assumption that the lease was to expire on the 23rd February, 1938.\nFor instance in a letter written on behalf of the Government on the 25th February, 1938, the following statement is made - I have the honour to inform you that none of your agents was present at the Akra brickfield today as previously arranged to make over the possession of the brickfields.\nYou are therefore requested to please inform me about as to what arrangements are being made by you to make over the possession of the said brickfield to this department\nThe term of lease expires on the afternoon of the 23rd February, 1938.\nApart from the fact that the appellants did not set up in any of their letters a case of holding over, we have to see whether the plea can be said to have been successfully made out by them.\nThere is no doubt that the appellants have established that the rent was paid on their behalf up to the 31st March, 1938, and it was accepted by the respondent No. 1. It has also been established that this payment was made by a cheque and that cheque has been cashed by the Government.\nSection 116 of the Transfer of Property Act, on which reliance was placed on behalf of the appellants, runs as follows - If a lessee or underlessee of property remains in possession thereof after the determination of the lease granted to the lessee, and the lessor or his legal representative accepts rent from the lessee or under-lessee, or otherwise assents to his continuing in possession, the lease is, in the absence of an agreement to the contrary, renewed from year to year, or from month to month, according to the purpose for which the property is leased\nThis section was construed by the Federal Court in K. B. Capadia v. Bai Jerbai Warden and Another 1959 F.C.R. 262, and it was held that where rent was accepted by the landlord after the expiration of the tenancy by efflux of time, section 116 applied even though the landlord accepted the amount remitted to him as part deposit towards his claim for compensation for illegal use and occupation, and without prejudice to his rights.\nIt is to be noted that in that case rent had been accepted after the expiry of the tenancy.\nIn our judgment, the present case cannot be governed by that decision, because of the fact, which in our opinion is important that here the payment of rent up to the 31st March, 1938, was made not after the date of expiry of the lease, but on the 5th April, 1937, nearly a year before the expiry of the lease.\nA reference to section 116 of the Transfer of Property Act will show that for the application of that section, two things are necessary - (1) the lessee should be in possession after the termination of the lease and (2) the lessor or his representative should accept rent or otherwise assent to his continuing in possession.\nThe use of the word otherwise suggests that acceptance of rent by the landlords has been treated as a form of his giving assent to the tenants continuance of possession.\nThere can be no question of the lessee continuing in possession until the lease has expired, and the context in which the provision for acceptance of rent finds a place clearly shows that what is contemplated is that the payment of rent and its acceptance should be made at such a time and in such a manner as to be equivalent to the landlord assenting to the lessee continuing in possession.\nBoth the courts below, after dealing with the matter elaborately, have concurrently held that in the circumstances of the case the consent of respondent No. 1 to the appellants continuing in possession cannot be inferred, and we agree with this finding\nIt was pointed out to us on behalf of the respondent that the entry relating to this payment in the books of the plaintiff contains the words received without prejudice from Karnani Industrial Bank The same words however occur in several earlier entries, and we are not inclined to attach any special significance to them.\nBut it seems to us that the very fact, that the payment was made at a time when there was no question of the lessor assenting to the lessees continuing in possession and neither party treated the payment as importing such assent, is sufficient to take the case out of the mischief of section 116 of the Transfer of Property Act.\nThere is also another view which we think is possible to take upon the facts of the case. As we have seen the rent for the first year was paid in advance near about the time of the execution of the lease, and nothing turns upon it.\nWhen however the second payment was made, the sum paid was Rs. 6,714 and odd, and the payment was made in respect of rent up to the 31st March, 1930.\nAfter this, all the subsequent payments were made up to the 31st March of the succeeding year, evidently because the financial year, which the parties considered themselves to be governed by, ran from the 1st April to the 31st March of the succeeding year.\nIt was presumably in view of this fact that the plaintiff filed an application on the 6th November, 1941, for amending the plaint so as to include the following statement - The plaintiff submits that even assuming that the registered lease terminated on the 23rd February, 1938, by an agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant No. 1, the latter was allowed to hold over up to the 31st March, 1938.\nThis application however was rejected, because it was made at a very late stage, that is to say, after the defendants evidence had been closed and an adjournment had been granted to the plaintiff to adduce rebutting evidence.\nHowever that may be, the utmost that can be said upon the evidence as it stands is that by the implied consent of the parties the period of the lease was extended up to the 31st March, 1938.\nIn this view, the respondent No. 1 became entitled to re-enter after the 31st March, and no notice under section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act was necessary.\nIn the circumstances, the decree for ejectment passed by the courts below must be upheld.\nThe next question which arises in the case turns on the proper construction of clause 11 of Part I and clause 1 of Part III of the lease, which have already been quoted.\nIt seems to us that clause 11 should be read as a whole, and, when it is so read, it becomes clear that it was intended to be applicable only where the Secretary of State decided to exercise his right to terminate the lease at any time subject to 6 months notice, in the event of the lessee failing to observe and duly perform the conditions mentioned in the lease.\nIn such a case, if the lessee did not remove the boilers, engines and all other materials and yield up the premises to the Secretary of State, those articles were to become the property of the Secretary of State.\nThis clause is evidently not applicable to the present case.\nThe clause which applies to this case is clause 1 of Part III, which is intended to be applicable to the normal case of the lease expiring by efflux of time.\nThis clause, as we have seen, provides that the lessee shall be at liberty to keep on the demised premises for 3 months after the expiration of the lease any bricks, boilers, etc., but it also provides that any bricks and other materials left in contravention of this condition shall become the absolute property of the Secretary of State without payment.\nThere can be no doubt that under this clause, the bricks and other materials have become the absolute property of the plaintiff.\nThe only question is as to the meaning of other materials.\nIt seems to us on an examination of the lease as a whole that there must be a distinction between materials, and machinery and tools and similar articles, and the words other materials have no reference to engines, trucks, railway and tramway lines and plant.\nThey mean building materials such as bricks, tiles and similar articles that might have been manufactured by the appellants on the demised premises.\nThat being so, the decree under appeal should be modified accordingly.\nThe only other point which arises for consideration relates to the plaintiffs prayer for a decree for permanent injunction against the defendants, to restrain them from removing or otherwise disposing of the articles in regard to which the decree is to be passed.\nIt was contended on behalf of the appellants that the respondent No. 1 not being in possession of these properties could not ask for the relief of injunction without asking for the declaration of its title in respect of them and possession over them, and in support of this proposition, the following cases were cited - Ratnasabhapathi Pillai and Others v. Ramaswami Aiyar I.L.R. 33 Mad. 482, Bhramar Lal Banduri and Others v. Nanda Lal Chowdhuri 24 I.C. 199 and Valia Tamburatti v. Parvati and Others I.L.R. 13 Mad. 455.\nAfter reading and fully considering those cases, we find them to be wholly inapplicable to the present case.\nIn the present case, it has been found that the bricks and other materials have become the property of the plaintiff, and there can be no legal objection to the granting of an injunction as prayed.", + "expert_5": "On the 17th February, 1928, the respondent No. 1 executed a lease (exhibit 3) in respect of the said land for 10 years\nThe lease was to commence from the 24th February, 1928\nWe beg to enclose herewith a cheque for Rs. 6,000 in payment of rent Akra brickfield for the year 1937-38 ending 31st March, 1938, and shall thank you to please favour us with your formal receipt for the above.\nOn the 27th August, 1937, the appellants applied to the Secretary to the Government of Bengal, Public Works Department, for renewing the lease for a further period of 10 years, but no reply was received to that letter.\nAfter addressing several other letters, the appellants received a letter dated the 23rd February, 1938, with which was enclosed a copy of an extract from a letter addressed by the Executive Engineer, Suburban Division to the Assistant Engineer, No. III Sub-division, which was as under - He is requested to make arrangements with Messrs. \n Karnani Industrial Bank Limited for vacant possession of the Akra brickfield on the 24th instant as the lease with the Bank will expire on the 23rd instant according to the terms of the agreement.\nUltimately, on the 17th March, 1938, the appellants received the following communication from the Excecutive Engineer, Suburban Division - I would inform you that it is not the intention of Government in this Department to lease out the brickfields and arrangement is being accordingly made to make over the lands to the Government in the Revenue Department for disposal.\nIn a subsequent letter dated the 14th September, 1938, the Executive Engineer wrote to the appellants as follows - I am instructed to state that Government have decided that you cannot be allowed to continue in occupation of the premises any further However, as a matter of grace Government will allow you time till the 30th day of September next, to dismantle the kilns and to remove all your bricks, boiler etc. from the site, on which date Government will take over possession of the property from you.\nThe correspondence to which reference has been made does not show that at any point of time the plaintiff had assented to the appellants continuance of possession.\nOn the other hand, some of the letters written by the appellants show that, notwithstanding their having paid rent up to the 31st March, 1938, they had proceeded all along on the footing that the lease was to expire in February, 1938.\nFor instance, in the appellants letter of the 23rd August, 1937, it is stated we are desirous of renewing the lease of the brickfield for a further period of 10 years from the date of the expiration of the period of the lease dated 17-2-1928. Again, in the letter dated the 23rd October, 1937, reference is made to the appellants application for renewal of the lease for a further period of 10 years on its expiry.\nEven in the letter which was written on behalf of the appellants on the 3rd March, 1938, after the expiry of the date on which the lease was to terminate, the statement made in the earlier letters was repeated, and it was further stated we applied for renewal of the lease on the 23rd August, 1937, six months prior to the date of expiration of the lease. In this letter, it is nowhere suggested that the appellants were holding over by reason of the acceptance of rent up to the 31st March, 1938.\nOn the other hand, at the end of this letter, we find the following statement - We therefore pray that if the Government is not at all inclined to renew the lease, time may be granted to us for dismantling and removing till the end of December, 1938, and we shall pay the proportional rent to the Government for seven months time in pursuance of the terms of the lease. The reference to the period of 7 months shows that it was assumed that the lease had expired in February, 1938.\nThe letters written on behalf of the Government point to the same conclusion, namely, that both the parties were acting on the assumption that the lease was to expire on the 23rd February, 1938.\nFor instance in a letter written on behalf of the Government on the 25th February, 1938, the following statement is made - I have the honour to inform you that none of your agents was present at the Akra brickfield today as previously arranged to make over the possession of the brickfields. You are therefore requested to please inform me about as to what arrangements are being made by you to make over the possession of the said brickfield to this department. The term of lease expires on the afternoon of the 23rd February, 1938.\nThere is no doubt that the appellants have established that the rent was paid on their behalf up to the 31st March, 1938, and it was accepted by the respondent No. 1.\nIt is to be noted that in that case rent had been accepted after the expiry of the tenancy.\nIn our judgment, the present case cannot be governed by that decision, because of the fact, which in our opinion is important that here the payment of rent up to the 31st March, 1938, was made not after the date of expiry of the lease, but on the 5th April, 1937, nearly a year before the expiry of the lease.\nA reference to section 116 of the Transfer of Property Act will show that for the application of that section, two things are necessary - (1) the lessee should be in possession after the termination of the lease and (2) the lessor or his representative should accept rent or otherwise assent to his continuing in possession.\nThere can be no question of the lessee continuing in possession until the lease has expired, and the context in which the provision for acceptance of rent finds a place clearly shows that what is contemplated is that the payment of rent and its acceptance should be made at such a time and in such a manner as to be equivalent to the landlord assenting to the lessee continuing in possession.\nBut it seems to us that the very fact, that the payment was made at a time when there was no question of the lessor assenting to the lessees continuing in possession and neither party treated the payment as importing such assent, is sufficient to take the case out of the mischief of section 116 of the Transfer of Property Act.\nAs we have seen the rent for the first year was paid in advance near about the time of the execution of the lease, and nothing turns upon it. When however the second payment was made, the sum paid was Rs. 6,714 and odd, and the payment was made in respect of rent up to the 31st March, 1930. After this, all the subsequent payments were made up to the 31st March of the succeeding year, evidently because the financial year, which the parties considered themselves to be governed by, ran from the 1st April to the 31st March of the succeeding year.\nIt was presumably in view of this fact that the plaintiff filed an application on the 6th November, 1941, for amending the plaint so as to include the following statement - The plaintiff submits that even assuming that the registered lease terminated on the 23rd February, 1938, by an agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant No. 1, the latter was allowed to hold over up to the 31st March, 1938.\nby the implied consent of the parties the period of the lease was extended up to the 31st March, 1938.\nThe clause which applies to this case is clause 1 of Part III, which is intended to be applicable to the normal case of the lease expiring by efflux of time. This clause, as we have seen, provides that the lessee shall be at liberty to keep on the demised premises for 3 months after the expiration of the lease any bricks, boilers, etc., but it also provides that any bricks and other materials left in contravention of this condition shall become the absolute property of the Secretary of State without payment. There can be no doubt that under this clause, the bricks and other materials have become the absolute property of the plaintiff.\nit has been found that the bricks and other materials have become the property of the plaintiff, and there can be no legal objection to the granting of an injunction as prayed." + }, + "1951_35": { + "expert_1": "In short, they asked the Court to give them relief by exercising the powers given to the Court by section 36 of the Act.\nThere was also a prayer for reconveyance of the Senapati Mahal. The respondent filed his written statement setting up a variety of defences rounded on merits as well as on legal pleas in bar. On May 8, 1941, the Subordinate Judge settled the issues and fixed June 9, 1941, for a preliminary hear- ing of the suit and particularly of such of the issues as have been based on the pleas in bar. Eventually, the case was taken up for preliminary hearing on September 4, 1941, and by his judgment delivered on September 8, 1941, the learned Subordinate Judge dismissed the suit on issue No. 2 which was as follows Does the plaint disclose a valid cause of action for the suit ? The appellants preferred an appeal to the High Court at Calcutta. Although the High Court (R.C. Mitter and K.C. Chunder JJ.) did not accept all the reasonings on which the learned Subordinate Judge had based his decision, they, however, agreed that the appellants could get no relief as the decrees in suit No. 78 of 1922 could not be reopened, as they were not passed in a suit to which this Act applies and consequently dis- missed the appeal. \n The appellants have now come up on appeal before us after having obtained a certificate from the High Court under section 110 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Learned Advocate appearing in support of this appeal before us has contended that the High Court was in error in holding that the decrees in Suit No. 78 of 1922 were not liable to be reopened under the second proviso to section 36 (1). Learned advocate for the respondent while joining issue on this point also raised a point which, however, did not find favour with the High Court, namely, that the respondent as a bona fide assignee for value of the mortgage debt was protected by sub-section (5) of section 36. It is quite clear that if either of the two points is decided against the appellants, this appeal must fail.\nIn the case now before us, the Suit No. 78 of 1922 was instituted and all the three decrees were passed long before the specified date. The only question that has therefore, to be consid- ered is whether any proceeding in execution was pending on or after that date. The answer to this question will depend on the true meaning and effect of the orders made by the executing Court (i) on January 30, 1937, and (ii) on June 2, 1939. As to (i)--It is not disputed that the order of January 30, 1937, was made under Order XXI, rule57, as amended by the Calcutta High Court.\nIt is evident from the language of the rule itself, and it is still more evident from the circumstances under which it was passed, that it was intended to provide a remedy for the grievance or inconvenience which is apt to arise, where, after an attachment in execution, the applica- tion for execution cannot further be proceeded with by reason of the decree-holders default.\nThe question before us is as to the category in which the order made on January 30, 1937, in Execution Case No. 118 of 1936 falls.\nIt will be noticed that those words formed part of the request of the judgmentdebtor which was being recited in the petition.\nIn the actual prayer portion the decree-holder did not use the words for the present but only asked the Court to strike off the execution case keeping the attachment in force. Further, apart from what the parties wanted, the Court made its intention clear in the very order that it passed and which is entered in column 20 of Exhibit F.\nThe fact that the Court gave an express direction that the attachment should continue clearly indicates that the Court intended to make a final order of dismissal.\nAgain, the heading of column 20 in Exhibit F clearly indicates that only a final order is to be entered in that column. The fact that the order was entered in that column affords some justification for the conclusion that the Court made a final order of dismissal. That the claim case was automatically dropped is yet another indication that the execution case was at an end. The fact that the judgment-debtor had paid the full costs of the execution case is also a feature which goes to show, to a certain extent at any rate if not deci- sively, that the execution proceeding was finally disposed of by the order.\nThis endorsement also clearly shows that the Court itself understood that the order that it made on January 30 1937, was a final order of dismissal and that the attachment had been continued by a special order. On a consideration of all these matters I have not the least doubt in my mind that the order of January 30, 1937, was in form and in substance a final order of dismissal of the Execution Case No. 118 of 1936 and that the attachment was continued by a special order such as is contemplated and authorised by the amend- ment made by the Calcutta High Court in rule 57.\nLearned advocate for the appellants contended that if the execution case came to an end the attachment could not be left hanging in the air. There is no substance in this argument. Ordi- narily, an attachment is supported by an execution case and if the execution case is simply dismissed the attachment must fail with it.\nBut rule 57, as amended, expressly empow- ers the Court to dismiss an execution application but at the same time to keep alive the attachment by a special order. That is what was done in this case. Here the attachment does not, to use the expression of the learned advocate for the appellants, hang in the air. It rests upon the solid foundation of a special order which rule 57, as amended, in terms authorises the Court to make. The continuance of the attachment, in the circumstances, needs no execution proceeding to support it.\nUnder Order XXXVIII, rule 11, where after an order of attachment before judgment a decree is passed in favour of the plaintiff, it is not necessary upon an application for execution of such a decree to apply for re-attachment of the property. It means that the attachment continues and the judgmentdebtor cannot deal with the property to the disadvantage of the decree- holder. After the decree is passed, the attachment continues but nobody will say that although there has been no applica- tion for the execution of the decree at any time by the decree-holder there is, nevertheless, an execution proceed- ing pending merely because the attachment continues.\nHere also the attachment subsists and rests only upon the terms of Order, XXXVIII rule 11, and without any proceeding. Such attachment cannot be called a proceeding in execution, for none was ever initiated after the decree was passed.\nIn my judgment, the order of January 30, 1937, was a final order which brought the Execution Case No. 118 of 1936, to an and and the attachment continued, not because there was a pend- ing execution proceeding but because a special order was made under Order XXI, rule 57, as amended by the High Court.\nLearned advocate for the appellants then contended that the petition (Ex. 2a) dated June 2, 1939, amounted to a proceeding in execution and as that was insti- tuted and was pending after January 1, 1939 the proceedings came within the definition in section 2 (22)of a suit to which this Act applies. I do not think this argument is sound. The petition (Ex.2a) was not really an application at all.\nIn substance, it was nothing but a certification by the decree-holder of the satisfaction of the decree.\nThe mere fact (1) 33 C.W.N. 267 A.I.R. 1929 P.C. 19, that the document was in the form of a petition could not convert what was really the usual certifying procedure into a proceeding in execution for recovery of a loan or for enforcement of any agreement. It was purely an intimation given to the Court by the decreeholder that the decree had been satisfied out of Court and the prayer for withdrawal of the attachment was merely consequential and would follow as a matter of course on full satisfaction of the decree being recorded. The order made on that petition also shows that the decree was recorded as adjusted and the attachment was cancelled.\nIn my judgment, that petition (Ex. 2a) was not an application such as would initiate a proceeding in execution for any of the purposes mentioned in clauses (a) or (b) or (c) of section 2 (22) of the Act.\nFor reasons stated above, the decrees sought to be reopened were not decrees made in a suit to which this Act applies. Suit No. 78 of 1922 was neither instituted on or after January 1, 1939, nor was it pending on that date, all the three decrees having been passed long before that date. Nor was any proceeding in execution such as is contemplated by section 2 (22) instituted or pending on or after that date. The Execution Case No. 118 of 1936 was at an end on January 30, 1937, and the petition of June 2, 1939, was not an application at all and was certainly not a proceeding in execution within the meaning of section 2 (22) of the Act.\nThis conclusion is sufficient to dismiss this appeal\nThe result is that this appeal must stand dismissed with costs and I order accordingly.\n-I agree.", + "expert_2": "the appellants have become the successors in interest of the mortgagors and the respondent Deva Prasanna Mukerjee has become the successor in interest of the mortga- gee under the mortgage of August 10, 1908.\nIn 1936, Deva Prasanna started execution case No. 118 of 1936 for execution of the personal decree and attached certain properties alleging that the same belonged to the Raja. The exact date of the attachment does not appear from the printed record. \nThe Raja as Sibait of a certain deity and his two sons, the appellants before us, objected to the attachment of these properties and filed a claim case.\nOn June 2, 1939, a petition was filed in the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Asansole, on behalf of Deva Prasanna as the decree holder. It was headed Money Execution Case No. 118 of 1936.\nOrder The said attachment is cancelled and the decree in question is recorded as adjusted as stated by learned plead- er for the decree-holder and pleader of the judgment-debtor according to the adjustment mentioned but not detailed in this petition of to-day.\nThe Bengal Money Lend- ers Act, 1940 (Bengal Act X of 1940) hereinafter called the Act, came into force on September 1, 1940. On January 2, 1941, the appellants who, as the legal representatives of the Raja, became borrowers within the meaning of the Act filed the suit out of which the present appeal has arisen. The suit was filed by the appellants against the respondent under section 36 of the Act praying for reopening the trans- actions and taking accounts and for release from all liabil- ities in excess of the limits specified by law. In short, they asked the Court to give them relief by exercising the powers given to the Court by section 36 of the Act.\nAlthough the High Court (R.C. Mitter and K.C. Chunder JJ.) did not accept all the reasonings on which the learned Subordinate Judge had based his decision, they, however, agreed that the appellants could get no relief as the decrees in suit No. 78 of 1922 could not be reopened, as they were not passed in a suit to which this Act applies and consequently dis- missed the appeal. \n The appellants have now come up on appeal before us after having obtained a certificate from the High Court under section 110 of the Code of Civil Procedure.\nLearned Advocate appearing in support of this appeal before us has contended that the High Court was in error in holding that the decrees in Suit No. 78 of 1922 were not liable to be reopened under the second proviso to section 36 (1). Learned advocate for the respondent while joining issue on this point also raised a point which, however, did not find favour with the High Court, namely, that the respondent as a bona fide assignee for value of the mortgage debt was protected by sub-section (5) of section 36.\nThe proviso makes it quite clear that in exercise of the powers the Court cannot reopen or otherwise affect a decree of a Court unless such decree is one which was passed in a suit to which this Act applies and which was not fully satisfied by January 1, 1939. In the light of the decision of the Full Bench of the Calcutta High Court in Mrityunjay Mitra v. Satis Chandra Banerji(1) which was approved by the Privy Council in Jadu Nath Roy v. Kshitish Chandra Acharyya(2), it has not been contended, in view of the fact that the personal decree for the balance remained unsatisfied on January 1, 1939, that the decrees in Suit No. 78 of 1922 were fully satisfied within the meaning of the above proviso. Therefore, the only thing that remains to be ascertained is whether the decrees were passed in a suit to which this Act applies\nthat where a decree is such that the suit in which it was passed had terminated before January 1, 1939, and no pro- ceeding in execution was started or was actually pending on or after that date it is not a decree in a suit to which this Act appliesand cannot be reopened.\nIt is evident from the language of the rule itself, and it is still more evident from the circumstances under which it was passed, that it was intended to provide a remedy for the grievance or inconvenience which is apt to arise, where, after an attachment in execution, the applica- tion for execution cannot further be proceeded with by reason of the decree-holders default. This was, and still is, a very common case. The decree-holder makes some informal arrangement to give the judgment-debtor time with- out obtaining full satisfaction of the decree the applica- tion for execution is not further prosecuted it is not withdrawn neither party attends. In these circumstances, the object of the rule is to say that the Court must make either an order for adjournment or an order of dismissal.\nThus the adjournment of the execution pro- ceedings kept the attachment alive without any special direction. While the adoption of this course helped bona fide arrangement between the decree-holder and the judgment-debtor as to the time and manner of satisfaction of the decree it was calculated also to encourage desultory proceedings resulting in undesirable congestion in the files of the Executing Court by keeping alive so many execution proceedings. \n On the other hand, while the dismissal of an application in the circumstances mentioned in the rule had the merit of preventing a congestion of the file by finally disposing of the application by a final order, it was calcu- lated to discourage decreeholders from giving even reasona- ble accommodation to the judgment-debtor on account of the destruction of the attachment which left the judgment-debtor free to deal with the property to the detriment of the decreeholder after the attachment ceased.\nThe rule thus amended leaves three courses open to the Executing Court in case it finds it difficult to proceed with the execution case by reason of the default of the decree-holder. It may (1) adjourn the proceedings for good reason which will automatically keep the attachment alive or (2) simply dismiss the application which will automatically destroy the attachment or (3) dismiss the application but specifically keep alive the attachment by an express order. The rule, as amended, therefore, contemplates three distinct forms of order, any one of which may be made by the Court in the circumstances mentioned in the rule.\nThe Court regarded the willingness of the the decree-holder to enter into a long and protracted negotiation with the judg- ment-debtor as evidence of unwillingness on the part of the decree-holder to diligently prosecute the execution proceedings and accordingly dismissed the execution case for non-prosecution but thought fit to expressly keep alive the attachment. It is quite obvious that the Court made an order of the third kind mentioned above.\nThe fact that the Court gave an express direction that the attachment should continue clearly indicates that the Court intended to make a final order of dismissal. Again, the heading of column 20 in Exhibit F clearly indicates that only a final order is to be entered in that column. The fact that the order was entered in that column affords some justification for the conclusion that the Court made a final order of dismissal.\nOrdi- narily, an attachment is supported by an execution case and if the execution case is simply dismissed the attachment must fail with it. But rule 57, as amended, expressly empow- ers the Court to dismiss an execution application but at the same time to keep alive the attachment by a special order.\nIn my judgment, the order of January 30, 1937, was a final order which brought the Execution Case No. 118 of 1936, to an and and the attachment continued, not because there was a pend- ing execution proceeding but because a special order was made under Order XXI, rule 57, as amended by the High Court.\nLearned advocate for the appellants then contended that the petition (Ex. 2a) dated June 2, 1939, amounted to a proceeding in execution and as that was insti- tuted and was pending after January 1, 1939 the proceedings came within the definition in section 2 (22)of a suit to which this Act applies.\nIn substance, it was nothing but a certification by the decree-holder of the satisfaction of the decree. The mere fact (1) 33 C.W.N. 267 A.I.R. 1929 P.C. 19, that the document was in the form of a petition could not convert what was really the usual certifying procedure into a proceeding in execution for recovery of a loan or for enforcement of any agreement. It was purely an intimation given to the Court by the decreeholder that the decree had been satisfied out of Court and the prayer for withdrawal of the attachment was merely consequential and would follow as a matter of course on full satisfaction of the decree being recorded.\nSuit No. 78 of 1922 was neither instituted on or after January 1, 1939, nor was it pending on that date, all the three decrees having been passed long before that date. Nor was any proceeding in execution such as is contemplated by section 2 (22) instituted or pending on or after that date. The Execution Case No. 118 of 1936 was at an end on January 30, 1937, and the petition of June 2, 1939, was not an application at all and was certainly not a proceeding in execution within the meaning of section 2 (22) of the Act.\nThe respondent who represents the sub-mortgagee decree-holder invokes the protection of two exemptions contained in the Act (1) Section 86 (1), proviso (ii), which exempts inter alia any decree other than a decree in a suit to which this Act applies which was not fully satisfied by the first day of January, 1939. \n This raises a dispute as to whether the respondents decree was passed in a suit to which the Act applies. (2) Section 36 (5) which exempts the rights of any assignee or holder for value if the Court is satisfied that the assignment to him was bona fide and that he had not received the notice re- ferred to in clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 28. This raises the question whether a sub-mortgagee is an assignee within the meaning of the Act.\nThe amendment which added the words unless the court shall make an order to the contrary at the end of the rule envisages a dismissal of an applica- tion for execution while at the same time continuing a subsisting attachment.\nIn this view, a proceeding in execution was pending on the 1st day of January, 1939, and the respondents decree must be taken to have been passed in a suit to which this Act applies , with the result that the respondents claim to exemption under proviso (ii) to sub-section (1) of sec- tion 36 of the Act must fail. I am, however, of opinion that the respondents claim to recover his decree debt is protected under section 36 (5).\nIt is not disputed that section 36 (5) applies to pre-Act debts. See Renula Bose v. Manmatha Nath Bose(2). The only question, therefore, is whether the respondent as sub-mortgagee is an assignee within the meaning of sub-section (5) of section 36.\nThey express no view as to the position which arises if the sub-mortgage contains only a charge on the original mortgage debt, but when it contains an assignment of that debt, and of all the rights of the mortgagee, the position appears to be free from difficulty. Relief can be given to the original mortgagor as against the original mortgagee under section 36, but such relief must not affect the rights of the assignee by way of sub-mort- gage.\nPromode Kumar Roy v. Nikhil Bhusan Mukhopadhya (1) and arises in the present case, as to whether a sub-mortga- gee becomes an assignee of the mortgage debt and of the mortgagees right to recover the debt from the original mortgagor. \n The Act affords relief to certain classes of debtors by curtailing pro tanto the rights of the creditors, subject to certain exceptions in regard to assignments of loans. In such a context the only relevant consideration could be whether the assignment is such as to establish a debtor and creditor relation between the assignee and the debtor so as to bring the case within the purview of the Act.\nIf the sub-mortgagee obtained, by virtue of the sub- mortgage, the right to sue the original mortgagor for recov- ery of the mortgage debt, that would seem sufficient to make him an assignee within the meaning of the Act. It was from this point of view that the question as to the nature of the right transferred to a sub-mortgagee under his sub-mortgage was considered in Promode Kumar Roy v. Nikhil Bhusan Mukho- padhya(1) as it has to be considered in the present case, and the reference to the sub-mortgage containing an assign- ment of all the rights (1) 76 I,A.", + "expert_3": "A suit had been instituted by one Kumar Dakhineswar Malia against Rameswar Malia, Rani Bhaba Sundari and others for partition of the Searsole Raj Estate\nOne Bhagabati Charan Mitra was appointed receiver of that estate in that suit. \nOn August 10, 1908, the said receiver with the permis- sion of the Court which had appointed him as receiver grant- ed two mining leases, each for 999 years--one in respect of 5/16 share of the Malias in Mouza Monohar Bahal and the other in respect of 230 bighas in village Marich Kota--to a firm then carrying on business under the name and style of Laik Banerjee Company.\nOn the same day the said receiver with like permission mortgaged these properties to the said firm as security for the due repayment of the loan of Rs. 100,000 advanced by that firm.\nThe Malias joined the re- ceiver in executing the aforesaid leases and the mortgage. \nAs a result of these transactions the firm of Laik Banerjee Company became the lessees for 999 years of the two properties as well as the mortgagee of the lessors interest in the same\nthe appellants have become the successors in interest of the mortgagors and the respondent Deva Prasanna Mukerjee has become the successor in interest of the mortga- gee under the mortgage of August 10, 1908\nOn March 31, 1922, Deva Prasanna filed suit No. 78 of 1922 for enforcing the mortgage of 1908. Preliminary decree was passed in the last mentioned suit on July 31, 1928, and a final decree for sale was made I on February 26, 1929\nIn execution of this final decree the mortgaged properties were sold at a Court i sale and were purchased by Deva Prasanna for Rs. 59,000\nThis sale was confirmed by the Court on June 30, 1931. A large sum remaining still due to Deva Prasanna, he applied for, and on October 30, 1935, obtained a personal decree for Rs. 1,27,179-0-6 against Raja Pramatha Nath Malia who had by inheritance acquired the lessors interest and become the borrower.\nIn 1936, Deva Prasanna started execution case No. 118 of 1936 for execution of the personal decree and attached certain properties alleging that the same belonged to the Raja.\nThe Raja as Sibait of a certain deity and his two sons, the appellants before us, objected to the attachment of these properties and filed a claim case.\nNegotiations for settlement started and eventually, on January 30, 1937, a petition (Ex. 2) was filed in the exe- cuting Court stating as follows - The judgment debtor having made special requests to the decree-holder for an amicable settlement of the aforesaid execution case, the decree-holder has agreed to the same.\nIt is, therefore, prayed that under the circumstances aforesaid, the Court may be pleased to strike off this execution case keeping the attachment in force\nThe execution case is dismissed for non- prosecution--the attachment already effected in this case continuing. 30th January 1937. The entry under column 11 of that very exhibit reads as follows -- Claim case automatically drops as the execution case is dismissed. It is, therefore, rejected without any sort of adjudication. 30th January 1937\nIn May 1937, the Searsole Raj Estate came under the charge of the Court of Wards. By a Kobala executed with the permission of the Board of Revenue Raja Pramatha Nath Malia and his two sons Kumars Pashupati Nath Malia and Kshitipati Nath Malia represented by Kumar Kshitipati Nath Malia as the Manager of the Searsole Raj Wards Estate conveyed a property known as Senapati Mahal to Deva Prasanna in full settlement of his claim under the personal decree against the Raja.\nBy an agreement of even date, Deva Prasanna agreed to reconvey Senapati Mahal to the Kumars if he was paid Rs. 90,000/- within two years from that date.\nSenapati Mahal orginally belonged to the Raja but had been tranSferred by him to his two sons. A creditor, however, had filed a suit under sec- tion 53 of the Transfer of Property Act challenging that transfer and had actually got a decree declaring that trans- fer as fradulent and void as against the creditors of the Raja An appeal was filed by the Kumars which was pending at the date of the Kobala of January 4, 1939, and, in the circum- stances, it was considered safer to join the Raja in the last mentioned Kobala in favour of Deva Prasanna.\nOn June 2, 1939, a petition was filed in the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Asansole, on behalf of Deva Prasanna as the decree holder.\nThe relevant portions of this petition were as follows-- That the above execution case was disposed of on the 30th January 1937 with the attachment of the properties subsisting since then the decree put into execution in the above case has been adjusted after remission of a large amount of interest by the out and out sale of certain properties by a registered Kobala dated 4th January 1939 So there is no longer any need of the said attachment remaining subsisting.\nIt is, therefore, prayed that the attachment may be withdrawn. \n On the same day the following order was made on that petition\nOrder The said attachment is cancelled and the decree in question is recorded as adjusted as stated by learned plead- er for the decree-holder and pleader of the judgment-debtor according to the adjustment mentioned but not detailed in this petition of to-day.\nthe following entry was made -- The said attachment is cancelled and the decree in question is recorded as adjusted as stated by learned pleader for the D.H. and the pleader of the Judgment Debtor according to the adjustment mentioned but not detailed in this petition of to-day\nThe Raja died in August, 1940, leaving the two appellants as his sons and legal representatives. The Bengal Money Lend- ers Act, 1940 (Bengal Act X of 1940) hereinafter called the Act, came into force on September 1, 1940. On January 2, 1941, the appellants who, as the legal representatives of the Raja, became borrowers within the meaning of the Act filed the suit out of which the present appeal has arisen\nThe suit was filed by the appellants against the respondent under section 36 of the Act praying for reopening the trans- actions and taking accounts and for release from all liabil- ities in excess of the limits specified by law. In short, they asked the Court to give them relief by exercising the powers given to the Court by section 36 of the Act\nThere was also a prayer for reconveyance of the Senapati Mahal\nEventually, the case was taken up for preliminary hearing on September 4, 1941, and by his judgment delivered on September 8, 1941, the learned Subordinate Judge dismissed the suit on issue No. 2 which was as follows Does the plaint disclose a valid cause of action for the suit\nEventually, the case was taken up for preliminary hearing on September 4, 1941, and by his judgment delivered on September 8, 1941, the learned Subordinate Judge dismissed the suit on issue No. 2 which was as follows Does the plaint disclose a valid cause of action for the suit ? The appellants preferred an appeal to the High Court at Calcutta.\nAlthough the High Court (R.C. Mitter and K.C. Chunder JJ.) did not accept all the reasonings on which the learned Subordinate Judge had based his decision, they, however, agreed that the appellants could get no relief as the decrees in suit No. 78 of 1922 could not be reopened, as they were not passed in a suit to which this Act applies and consequently dis- missed the appeal\nIt is quite clear that if either of the two points is decided against the appellants, this appeal must fail. The main provisions of section 36 (1)are in the follow- ing terms -- Notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force, if in any suit to which this Act ap- plies, or in any suit brought by a borrower for relief under this section, whether heard ex parte or otherwise, the Court has reason to believe that the exercise of one or more of the powers under this section will give relief to the bor- rower, it shall exercise all or any of the following powers as it may consider appropriate namely, shall (a) reopen any transaction and take an account between the parties (b) notwithstanding any agreement, purporting to close previous dealings and to create new obligations, reopen any account already taken between the parties (c) release the borrower of all liability in excess of the limits specified in clauses (t) and (2) of section 30 (d) if anything has been paid or allowed in account on or after the first day of January, 1939, in respect of the liability referred to in clause (c), order the lender to repay any sum which the Court considers to be repayable in respect of such payment or allowance in account as aforesaid (e) set aside either wholly or in part or revise or alter any security given or agreement made in respect of any loan, and if the lender has parted with the security, order him to indemnify the borrower in such manner and to such extent as it may deem just. It will be noticed (a) that the provisions of this section apply notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force, (b) that the powers conferred on the Court or to be exercised either in any suit to which this Act applies or in any suit brought by a borrower for relief under the section and (c) that the Court is called upon to exercise all or any of the powers conferred on it by the section if the Court has reason to believe that the exercise of one or more of the powers will give relief to the borrower. In the present case the borrowers have insti- tuted a substantive suit for relief under section 36 and, therefore, if there was nothing also in the section and the Court had the requisite belief, the Court could exercise all or any of the powers and give relief to the borrowers in terms of the prayers of the plaint.\nThe relevant portion of the second proviso is expressed in the words following Provided that in exercise of these powers the Court shall not- (i) \n do anything which affects any decree of a Court, other than a decree in a suit to which the Act applies which was not fully satisfied by the first day of January, 1939, or The proviso makes it quite clear that in exercise of the powers the Court cannot reopen or otherwise affect a decree of a Court unless such decree is one which was passed in a suit to which this Act applies and which was not fully satisfied by January 1, 1939. In the light of the decision of the Full Bench of the Calcutta High Court in Mrityunjay Mitra v. Satis Chandra Banerji(1) which was approved by the Privy Council in Jadu Nath Roy v. Kshitish Chandra Acharyya(2), it has not been contended, in view of the fact that the personal decree for the balance remained unsatisfied on January 1, 1939, that the decrees in Suit No. 78 of 1922 were fully satisfied within the meaning of the above proviso\nTherefore, the only thing that remains to be ascertained is whether the decrees were passed in a suit to which this Act applies.\nSection 2 (22) of the Act is as follows \n In this Act, unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context- \n Suit to which this Act applies means any suit or proceeding instituted or filed on or after the 1st day of January, 1939, or pending on that date and includes a pro- ceeding in execution-- (a) for the recovery of a loan advanced before or after the commencement of this Act (b) for the enforcement of any agreement entered into before or after the commencement of this Act, whether by way of settlement of account or otherwise, or of any security so taken, in respect of any loan advanced whether before or after the commencement of this Act or (c) for the redemption of any security given before or after the commencement of this Act in respect of any loan advanced whether before or after the commencement of this Act. The words instituted or filed on or after the 1st day of January, 1939, or pending on that date have been read and understood as qualifying the words any suit or proceed- ing in the beginning of the definition as well as the words proceeding in execution occurring further down see per Spens C.J. in Bank of Commerce Ltd. v.\nAmulya Krishna (3\nwhere a decree is such that the suit in which it was passed had terminated before January 1, 1939, and no pro- ceeding in execution was started or was actually pending on or after that date it is not a decree in a suit to which this Act appliesand cannot be reopened.\nThe same view was upheld by a Special Bench of the Calcutta High Court in Aparna Kumari v. Girish Chandra (2)which overruled two earlier decisions to the contrary\nIn the case now before us, the Suit No. 78 of 1922 was instituted and all the three decrees were passed long before the specified date. The only question that has therefore, to be consid- ered is whether any proceeding in execution was pending on or after that date.\nThe answer to this question will depend on the true meaning and effect of the orders made by the executing Court (i) on January 30, 1937, and (ii) on June 2, 1939. As to (i)--It is not disputed that the order of January 30, 1937, was made under Order XXI, rule57, as amended by the Calcutta High Court.\nOrder XXI, rule 57, is expressed in the following terms - Where any property has been attached in execution of a decree but by reason of the decree-holders default the Court is unable to proceed further with the application for execution, it shall either dismiss the application or for any sufficient reason adjourn the proceedings to a future date\nUpon the dismissal of such application the attachment shall cease. The marginal note of the rule is determination of at- tachment.\nThe reason why rule 57 was introduced in the Code of 1908 has been explained by Rank in C.J. in Shibnath Singh Ray v. Sheikh Saberuddin Ahmad\nIt is evident from the language of the rule itself, and it is still more evident from the circumstances under which it was passed, that it was intended to provide a remedy for the grievance or inconvenience which is apt to arise, where, after an attachment in execution, the applica- tion for execution cannot further be proceeded with by reason of the decree-holders default. This was, and still is, a very common case\nThe decree-holder makes some informal arrangement to give the judgment-debtor time with- out obtaining full satisfaction of the decree the applica- tion for execution is not further prosecuted it is not withdrawn neither party attends\nIn these circumstances, the object of the rule is to say that the Court must make either an order for adjournment or an order of dismissal. The reason why it was necessary to require the Court, if it did not adjourn a proceeding to a definite date, to dismiss the application for execution formally and definitely\nIn the absence of a definite order of dismissal the files of the Courts became encumbered with a number of applications for execution which were water-logged and derelict, and a practice arose whereby such applications were ordered to be struck off\nThis was a practice not justified by the Code and in cases where attachments in execution had already been entered, the question arose whether the effect of an order striking off was that the attachment made upon application for execution was itself struck off or whether it remained notwithstanding such an order. Many other awkward and important questions arose out of this practice and the object of rule 57 was to ensure that this illogical and inconvenient practice should be stopped\nApplications for execution were to be definitely dismissed if they were not adjourned to a future date\nThe object of the last sentence in rule 57 is to settle the question whether, when the application in execution is dismissed any attachment made under that application should fall to the ground or should subsist, and the legislature has provided that it is to fall to the ground. The new rule thus introduced left two distinct courses open to the executing Court in the situation envisaged by the rule\nThus the adjournment of the execution pro- ceedings kept the attachment alive without any special direction. While the adoption of this course helped bona fide arrangement between the decree-holder and the judgment-debtor as to the time and manner of satisfaction of the decree it was calculated also to encourage desultory proceedings resulting in undesirable congestion in the files of the Executing Court by keeping alive so many execution proceedings\nOn the other hand, while the dismissal of an application in the circumstances mentioned in the rule had the merit of preventing a congestion of the file by finally disposing of the application by a final order, it was calcu- lated to discourage decreeholders from giving even reasona- ble accommodation to the judgment-debtor on account of the destruction of the attachment which left the judgment-debtor free to deal with the property to the detriment of the decreeholder after the attachment ceased\nIt was evidently with a view to preserve the advantage of a dismissal and at the same time to avoid the disadvantage of the rigid rule of cesser of the attachment that the Calcutta High Court amend- ed rule 57 by adding the words unless the Court shall make an order to the contrary at the end of the last sentence of that rule\nThe rule thus amended leaves three courses open to the Executing Court in case it finds it difficult to proceed with the execution case by reason of the default of the decree-holder. It may (1) adjourn the proceedings for good reason which will automatically keep the attachment alive or (2) simply dismiss the application which will automatically destroy the attachment or (3) dismiss the application but specifically keep alive the attachment by an express order\nThe question before us is as to the category in which the order made on January 30, 1937, in Execution Case No. 118 of 1936 falls. It will be recalled that the order of January 30, 1937, was made on a petition (Exhibit 2) filed on that day in Execution Case No. 118 of 1936.\nGreat stress was laid by the learned advocate for the appellants on the words struck off for the present occurring in the body of that petition. It will be noticed that those words formed part of the request of the judgmentdebtor which was being recited in the petition. In the actual prayer portion the decree-holder did not use the words for the present but only asked the Court to strike off the execution case keeping the attachment in force.\nFurther, apart from what the parties wanted, the Court made its intention clear in the very order that it passed and which is entered in column 20 of Exhibit F. The Court regarded the willingness of the the decree-holder to enter into a long and protracted negotiation with the judg- ment-debtor as evidence of unwillingness on the part of the decree-holder to diligently prosecute the execution proceedings and accordingly dismissed the execution case for non-prosecution but thought fit to expressly keep alive the attachment\nIt is quite obvious that the Court made an order of the third kind mentioned above\nThe three forms of order permissible under rule 57 as amended by the High Court are quite distinct and independent of each other and there is no room for their overlapping. If the mere continuation of attachment will automatically convert an express order of dismissal of the execution application which is a final order into an order of adjournment which is not a final order then there was no point in the High Court taking the trouble of amending rule 57 at all\nThe Court could by simply adjourning the proceedings automatically continue the attachment without any express direction in that behalf\nThe fact that the Court gave an express direction that the attachment should continue clearly indicates that the Court intended to make a final order of dismissal\nthe heading of column 20 in Exhibit F clearly indicates that only a final order is to be entered in that column\nThe fact that the order was entered in that column affords some justification for the conclusion that the Court made a final order of dismissal. That the claim case was automatically dropped is yet another indication that the execution case was at an end.\nThe fact that the judgment-debtor had paid the full costs of the execution case is also a feature which goes to show, to a certain extent at any rate if not deci- sively, that the execution proceeding was finally disposed of by the order\nThis endorsement also clearly shows that the Court itself understood that the order that it made on January 30 1937, was a final order of dismissal and that the attachment had been continued by a special order. On a consideration of all these matters I have not the least doubt in my mind that the order of January 30, 1937, was in form and in substance a final order of dismissal of the Execution Case No. 118 of 1936 and that the attachment was continued by a special order such as is contemplated and authorised by the amend- ment made by the Calcutta High Court in rule 57.\nOrdi- narily, an attachment is supported by an execution case and if the execution case is simply dismissed the attachment must fail with it\nBut rule 57, as amended, expressly empow- ers the Court to dismiss an execution application but at the same time to keep alive the attachment by a special order. That is what was done in this case\nHere the attachment does not, to use the expression of the learned advocate for the appellants, hang in the air. It rests upon the solid foundation of a special order which rule 57, as amended, in terms authorises the Court to make. The continuance of the attachment, in the circumstances, needs no execution proceeding to support it.\nHere also the attachment subsists and rests only upon the terms of Order, XXXVIII rule 11, and without any proceeding. Such attachment cannot be called a proceeding in execution, for none was ever initiated after the decree was passed. In my judgment, the order of January 30, 1937, was a final order which brought the Execution Case No. 118 of 1936, to an and and the attachment continued, not because there was a pend- ing execution proceeding but because a special order was made under Order XXI, rule 57, as amended by the High Court.\nThe petition (Ex.2a) was not really an application at all\nIn substance, it was nothing but a certification by the decree-holder of the satisfaction of the decree. The mere fact (1) 33 C.W.N. 267 A.I.R. 1929 P.C. 19, that the document was in the form of a petition could not convert what was really the usual certifying procedure into a proceeding in execution for recovery of a loan or for enforcement of any agreement\nIt was purely an intimation given to the Court by the decreeholder that the decree had been satisfied out of Court and the prayer for withdrawal of the attachment was merely consequential and would follow as a matter of course on full satisfaction of the decree being recorded\nThe order made on that petition also shows that the decree was recorded as adjusted and the attachment was cancelled. In my judgment, that petition (Ex. 2a) was not an application such as would initiate a proceeding in execution for any of the purposes mentioned in clauses (a) or (b) or (c) of section 2 (22) of the Act.\nFor reasons stated above, the decrees sought to be reopened were not decrees made in a suit to which this Act applies\nSuit No. 78 of 1922 was neither instituted on or after January 1, 1939, nor was it pending on that date, all the three decrees having been passed long before that date. Nor was any proceeding in execution such as is contemplated by section 2 (22) instituted or pending on or after that date\nThe Execution Case No. 118 of 1936 was at an end on January 30, 1937, and the petition of June 2, 1939, was not an application at all and was certainly not a proceeding in execution within the meaning of section 2 (22) of the Act\nThis conclusion is sufficient to dismiss this appeal and it is not necessary for us to consider the other question raised by the respondent on the strength of section 36 (5) of the Act and I express no opinion on that question. The result is that this appeal must stand dismissed with costs and I order accordingly\nThis definition has been construed as requiring that the pro- ceeding in execution referred to therein should be pending on 1st January, 1939, and the question accordingly arises whether the order of the executing court dated 30th January, 1937, which purported to dismiss the respondents execution case for non-prosecution while continuing the attachment already effected, terminated the proceeding in execution which had resulted in the attachment.", + "expert_4": "This appeal arises out of a suit filed by the appellants on January 2, 1941, in the Court of the Subordi- nate Judge, Asansole.\nA suit had been instituted by one Kumar Dakhineswar Malia against Rameswar Malia, Rani Bhaba Sundari and others for partition of the Searsole Raj Estate.\nOne Bhagabati Charan Mitra was appointed receiver of that estate in that suit.\nOn August 10, 1908, the said receiver with the permis- sion of the Court which had appointed him as receiver grant- ed two mining leases, each for 999 years--one in respect of 5/16 share of the Malias in Mouza Monohar Bahal and the other in respect of 230 bighas in village Marich Kota--to a firm then carrying on business under the name and style of Laik Banerjee Company.\nOn the same day the said receiver with like permission mortgaged these properties to the said firm as security for the due repayment of the loan of Rs. 100,000 advanced by that firm.\nThe Malias joined the re- ceiver in executing the aforesaid leases and the mortgage.\nAs a result of these transactions the firm of Laik Banerjee Company became the lessees for 999 years of the two properties as well as the mortgagee of the lessors interest in the same.\nBy diverse processes not necessary to be detailed, the appellants have become the successors in interest of the mortgagors and the respondent Deva Prasanna Mukerjee has become the successor in interest of the mortga- gee under the mortgage of August 10, 1908.\nOn March 31, 1922, Deva Prasanna filed suit No. 78 of 1922 for enforcing the mortgage of 1908.\nPreliminary decree was passed in the last mentioned suit on July 31, 1928, and a final decree for sale was made I on February 26, 1929.\nIn execution of this final decree the mortgaged properties were sold at a Court i sale and were purchased by Deva Prasanna for Rs. 59,000.\nThis sale was confirmed by the Court on June 30, 1931.\nA large sum remaining still due to Deva Prasanna, he applied for, and on October 30, 1935, obtained a personal decree for Rs. 1,27,179-0-6 against Raja Pramatha Nath Malia who had by inheritance acquired the lessors interest and become the borrower.\nIn 1936, Deva Prasanna started execution case No. 118 of 1936 for execution of the personal decree and attached certain properties alleging that the same belonged to the Raja.\nThe Raja as Sibait of a certain deity and his two sons, the appellants before us, objected to the attachment of these properties and filed a claim case.\nNegotiations for settlement started and eventually, on January 30, 1937, a petition (Ex. 2) was filed in the exe- cuting Court stating as follows - The judgment debtor having made special requests to the decree-holder for an amicable settlement of the aforesaid execution case, the decree-holder has agreed to the same.\nThe judgment debtor has paid to the decree holder the costs of this execution amounting to Rs. 76-14-0, and he having made requests for this execution case being struck off for the present on keeping the attachment in force, the decreeholder has agreed to it.\nIt is, therefore, prayed that under the circumstances aforesaid, the Court may be pleased to strike off this execution case keeping the attachment in force.\nNeither the original nor a certified copy of the order made on that date by the executing Court on the above petition is forthcoming but the parties have definite- ly agreed that the order is substantially and correctly entered in column 20 of Ex. F which is a certified copy of extract from the Register of applications for executions of decrees relating to execution Case No. 118 of 1936.\nThe heading of column 20 is Date on which execution case was finally disposed of and purport of final order.\nThe entry in column 20 under that head is \n H. admits receipt of Rs. 76-14/- as costs of this case from the J.D.\nThe execution case is dismissed for non- prosecution--the attachment already effected in this case continuing. 30th January 1937.\nThe entry under column 11 of that very exhibit reads as follows -- Claim case automatically drops as the execution case is dismissed.\nIt is, therefore, rejected without any sort of adjudication. 30th January 1937.\nIn May 1937, the Searsole Raj Estate came under the charge of the Court of Wards.\nBy a Kobala executed with the permission of the Board of Revenue Raja Pramatha Nath Malia and his two sons Kumars Pashupati Nath Malia and Kshitipati Nath Malia represented by Kumar Kshitipati Nath Malia as the Manager of the Searsole Raj Wards Estate conveyed a property known as Senapati Mahal to Deva Prasanna in full settlement of his claim under the personal decree against the Raja.\nBy an agreement of even date, Deva Prasanna agreed to reconvey Senapati Mahal to the Kumars if he was paid Rs. 90,000/- within two years from that date.\nSenapati Mahal orginally belonged to the Raja but had been tranSferred by him to his two sons.\nA creditor, however, had filed a suit under sec- tion 53 of the Transfer of Property Act challenging that transfer and had actually got a decree declaring that trans- fer as fradulent and void as against the creditors of the Raja An appeal was filed by the Kumars which was pending at the date of the Kobala of January 4, 1939, and, in the circum- stances, it was considered safer to join the Raja in the last mentioned Kobala in favour of Deva Prasanna.\nOn June 2, 1939, a petition was filed in the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Asansole, on behalf of Deva Prasanna as the decree holder.\nIt was headed Money Execution Case No. 118 of 1936.\nThe relevant portions of this petition were as follows-- That the above execution case was disposed of on the 30th January 1937 with the attachment of the properties subsisting since then the decree put into execution in the above case has been adjusted after remission of a large amount of interest by the out and out sale of certain properties by a registered Kobala dated 4th January 1939 So there is no longer any need of the said attachment remaining subsisting.\nIt is, therefore, prayed that the attachment may be withdrawn.\nOn the same day the following order was made on that petition-- Heard learned pleaders for the parties. They jointly ask me to cancel the attachment (existing by special order) in Money Ex. 118 of 1936 though that case was dismissed.\nOrder The said attachment is cancelled and the decree in question is recorded as adjusted as stated by learned plead- er for the decree-holder and pleader of the judgment-debtor according to the adjustment mentioned but not detailed in this petition of to-day.\nThe said attachment is cancelled and the decree in question is recorded as adjusted as stated by learned pleader for the D.H. and the pleader of the Judgment Debtor according to the adjustment mentioned but not detailed in this petition of to-day.\nThe Raja died in August, 1940, leaving the two appellants as his sons and legal representatives.\nThe Bengal Money Lend- ers Act, 1940 (Bengal Act X of 1940) hereinafter called the Act, came into force on September 1, 1940.\nOn January 2, 1941, the appellants who, as the legal representatives of the Raja, became borrowers within the meaning of the Act filed the suit out of which the present appeal has arisen.\nThe suit was filed by the appellants against the respondent under section 36 of the Act praying for reopening the trans- actions and taking accounts and for release from all liabil- ities in excess of the limits specified by law.\nIn short, they asked the Court to give them relief by exercising the powers given to the Court by section 36 of the Act. There was also a prayer for reconveyance of the Senapati Mahal.\nThe respondent filed his written statement setting up a variety of defences rounded on merits as well as on legal pleas in bar.\nOn May 8, 1941, the Subordinate Judge settled the issues and fixed June 9, 1941, for a preliminary hear- ing of the suit and particularly of such of the issues as have been based on the pleas in bar.\nEventually, the case was taken up for preliminary hearing on September 4, 1941, and by his judgment delivered on September 8, 1941, the learned Subordinate Judge dismissed the suit on issue No. 2 which was as follows Does the plaint disclose a valid cause of action for the suit ?\nThe appellants preferred an appeal to the High Court at Calcutta.\nAlthough the High Court (R.C. Mitter and K.C. Chunder JJ.) did not accept all the reasonings on which the learned Subordinate Judge had based his decision, they, however, agreed that the appellants could get no relief as the decrees in suit No. 78 of 1922 could not be reopened, as they were not passed in a suit to which this Act applies and consequently dis- missed the appeal.\nThe appellants have now come up on appeal before us after having obtained a certificate from the High Court under section 110 of the Code of Civil Procedure.\nLearned Advocate appearing in support of this appeal before us has contended that the High Court was in error in holding that the decrees in Suit No. 78 of 1922 were not liable to be reopened under the second proviso to section 36 (1).\nLearned advocate for the respondent while joining issue on this point also raised a point which, however, did not find favour with the High Court, namely, that the respondent as a bona fide assignee for value of the mortgage debt was protected by sub-section (5) of section 36.\nIt is quite clear that if either of the two points is decided against the appellants, this appeal must fail.\nThe main provisions of section 36 (1)are in the follow- ing terms -- Notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force, if in any suit to which this Act ap- plies, or in any suit brought by a borrower for relief under this section, whether heard ex parte or otherwise, the Court has reason to believe that the exercise of one or more of the powers under this section will give relief to the bor- rower, it shall exercise all or any of the following powers as it may consider appropriate namely, shall (a) reopen any transaction and take an account between the parties (b) notwithstanding any agreement, purporting to close previous dealings and to create new obligations, reopen any account already taken between the parties (c) release the borrower of all liability in excess of the limits specified in clauses (t) and (2) of section 30 (d) if anything has been paid or allowed in account on or after the first day of January, 1939, in respect of the liability referred to in clause (c), order the lender to repay any sum which the Court considers to be repayable in respect of such payment or allowance in account as aforesaid (e) set aside either wholly or in part or revise or alter any security given or agreement made in respect of any loan, and if the lender has parted with the security, order him to indemnify the borrower in such manner and to such extent as it may deem just.\nIt will be noticed (a) that the provisions of this section apply notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force, (b) that the powers conferred on the Court or to be exercised either in any suit to which this Act applies or in any suit brought by a borrower for relief under the section and (c) that the Court is called upon to exercise all or any of the powers conferred on it by the section if the Court has reason to believe that the exercise of one or more of the powers will give relief to the borrower.\nIn the present case the borrowers have insti- tuted a substantive suit for relief under section 36 and, therefore, if there was nothing also in the section and the Court had the requisite belief, the Court could exercise all or any of the powers and give relief to the borrowers in terms of the prayers of the plaint.\nThere are, however, two provisions to sub-section (1) of section 36.\nThe relevant portion of the second proviso is expressed in the words following Provided that in exercise of these powers the Court shall not- (i) \n do anything which affects any decree of a Court, other than a decree in a suit to which the Act applies which was not fully satisfied by the first day of January, 1939, or The proviso makes it quite clear that in exercise of the powers the Court cannot reopen or otherwise affect a decree of a Court unless such decree is one which was passed in a suit to which this Act applies and which was not fully satisfied by January 1, 1939.\nIn the light of the decision of the Full Bench of the Calcutta High Court in Mrityunjay Mitra v. Satis Chandra Banerji(1) which was approved by the Privy Council in Jadu Nath Roy v. Kshitish Chandra Acharyya(2), it has not been contended, in view of the fact that the personal decree for the balance remained unsatisfied on January 1, 1939, that the decrees in Suit No. 78 of 1922 were fully satisfied within the meaning of the above proviso.\nTherefore, the only thing that remains to be ascertained is whether the decrees were passed in a suit to which this Act applies.\nSection 2 (22) of the Act is as follows \n In this Act, unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context- \n Suit to which this Act applies means any suit or proceeding instituted or filed on or after the 1st day of January, 1939, or pending on that date and includes a pro- ceeding in execution-- (a) for the recovery of a loan advanced before or after the commencement of this Act (b) for the enforcement of any agreement entered into before or after the commencement of this Act, whether by way of settlement of account or otherwise, or of any security so taken, in respect of any loan advanced whether before or after the commencement of this Act or (c) for the redemption of any security given before or after the commencement of this Act in respect of any loan advanced whether before or after the commencement of this Act.\nThe words instituted or filed on or after the 1st day of January, 1939, or pending on that date have been read and understood as qualifying the words any suit or proceed- ing in the beginning of the definition as well as the words proceeding in execution occurring further down see per Spens C.J. in Bank of Commerce Ltd. v. Amulya Krishna (3).\nAccordingly, it has \n I.L.R. 11944) 2Cal. 376 48 C.W.N. 361. L.R. 76 I.A. 179 at p. 190. (3) 1944 F.C.R. 126A.I.R. 1944 F.C. 18. been held in Ram Kumar De v. Abhoya Pada Bhattacharjee (1) that where a decree is such that the suit in which it was passed had terminated before January 1, 1939, and no pro- ceeding in execution was started or was actually pending on or after that date it is not a decree in a suit to which this Act appliesand cannot be reopened.\nThe same view was upheld by a Special Bench of the Calcutta High Court in Aparna Kumari v. Girish Chandra (2)which overruled two earlier decisions to the contrary.\nThe construction put upon section 2 (22)by the Special Bench and the reasons given by them appear to us to be well-founded.\nIn the case now before us, the Suit No. 78 of 1922 was instituted and all the three decrees were passed long before the specified date.\nThe only question that has therefore, to be consid- ered is whether any proceeding in execution was pending on or after that date.\nThe answer to this question will depend on the true meaning and effect of the orders made by the executing Court (i) on January 30, 1937, and (ii) on June 2, 1939.\nAs to (i)--It is not disputed that the order of January 30, 1937, was made under Order XXI, rule57, as amended by the Calcutta High Court\nOrder XXI, rule 57, is expressed in the following terms - Where any property has been attached in execution of a decree but by reason of the decree-holders default the Court is unable to proceed further with the application for execution, it shall either dismiss the application or for any sufficient reason adjourn the proceedings to a future date. Upon the dismissal of such application the attachment shall cease.\nThe marginal note of the rule is determination of at- tachment.\nThe reason why rule 57 was introduced in the Code of 1908 has been explained by Rank in C.J. in Shibnath Singh Ray v. Sheikh Saberuddin Ahmad(3) as follows-- (1) 46 C.W.N. 557 A.I.R. 1942 Cal. 441. (2) 48 C.W.N, 406. I.L.R. 56 Cal. 416 at pp. 421-422 Rule 57 of Order XXI was a new provision introduced in 1908.\nIt is evident from the language of the rule itself, and it is still more evident from the circumstances under which it was passed, that it was intended to provide a remedy for the grievance or inconvenience which is apt to arise, where, after an attachment in execution, the applica- tion for execution cannot further be proceeded with by reason of the decree-holders default.\nThis was, and still is, a very common case.\nThe decree-holder makes some informal arrangement to give the judgment-debtor time with- out obtaining full satisfaction of the decree the applica- tion for execution is not further prosecuted it is not withdrawn neither party attends.\nIn these circumstances, the object of the rule is to say that the Court must make either an order for adjournment or an order of dismissal.\nThe reason why it was necessary to require the Court, if it did not adjourn a proceeding to a definite date, to dismiss the application for execution formally and definitely can be amply illustrated from the decided cases.\nIn the absence of a definite order of dismissal the files of the Courts became encumbered with a number of applications for execution which were water-logged and derelict, and a practice arose whereby such applications were ordered to be struck off.\nThis was a practice not justified by the Code and in cases where attachments in execution had already been entered, the question arose whether the effect of an order striking off was that the attachment made upon application for execution was itself struck off or whether it remained notwithstanding such an order.\nMany other awkward and important questions arose out of this practice and the object of rule 57 was to ensure that this illogical and inconvenient practice should be stopped.\nApplications for execution were to be definitely dismissed if they were not adjourned to a future date.\nThe object of the last sentence in rule 57 is to settle the question whether, when the application in execution is dismissed any attachment made under that application should fall to the ground or should subsist, and the legislature has provided that it is to fall to the ground.\nThe new rule thus introduced left two distinct courses open to the executing Court in the situation envisaged by the rule.\nEach course had its advantage as well as its disadvantage.\nThus the adjournment of the execution pro- ceedings kept the attachment alive without any special direction.\nWhile the adoption of this course helped bona fide arrangement between the decree-holder and the judgment-debtor as to the time and manner of satisfaction of the decree it was calculated also to encourage desultory proceedings resulting in undesirable congestion in the files of the Executing Court by keeping alive so many execution proceedings.\nOn the other hand, while the dismissal of an application in the circumstances mentioned in the rule had the merit of preventing a congestion of the file by finally disposing of the application by a final order, it was calcu- lated to discourage decreeholders from giving even reasona- ble accommodation to the judgment-debtor on account of the destruction of the attachment which left the judgment-debtor free to deal with the property to the detriment of the decreeholder after the attachment ceased.\nIt was evidently with a view to preserve the advantage of a dismissal and at the same time to avoid the disadvantage of the rigid rule of cesser of the attachment that the Calcutta High Court amend- ed rule 57 by adding the words unless the Court shall make an order to the contrary at the end of the last sentence of that rule.\nThe rule thus amended leaves three courses open to the Executing Court in case it finds it difficult to proceed with the execution case by reason of the default of the decree-holder.\nIt may (1) adjourn the proceedings for good reason which will automatically keep the attachment alive or (2) simply dismiss the application which will automatically destroy the attachment or (3) dismiss the application but specifically keep alive the attachment by an express order.\nThe rule, as amended, therefore, contemplates three distinct forms of order, any one of which may be made by the Court in the circumstances mentioned in the rule.\nThe question before us is as to the category in which the order made on January 30, 1937, in Execution Case No. 118 of 1936 falls.\nIt will be recalled that the order of January 30, 1937, was made on a petition (Exhibit 2) filed on that day in Execution Case No. 118 of 1936.\nGreat stress was laid by the learned advocate for the appellants on the words struck off for the present occurring in the body of that petition.\nIt will be noticed that those words formed part of the request of the judgmentdebtor which was being recited in the petition\nIn the actual prayer portion the decree-holder did not use the words for the present but only asked the Court to strike off the execution case keeping the attachment in force.\nFurther, apart from what the parties wanted, the Court made its intention clear in the very order that it passed and which is entered in column 20 of Exhibit F.\nThe Court regarded the willingness of the the decree-holder to enter into a long and protracted negotiation with the judg- ment-debtor as evidence of unwillingness on the part of the decree-holder to diligently prosecute the execution proceedings and accordingly dismissed the execution case for non-prosecution but thought fit to expressly keep alive the attachment. It is quite obvious that the Court made an order of the third kind mentioned above.\nThe three forms of order permissible under rule 57 as amended by the High Court are quite distinct and independent of each other and there is no room for their overlapping.\nIf the mere continuation of attachment will automatically convert an express order of dismissal of the execution application which is a final order into an order of adjournment which is not a final order then there was no point in the High Court taking the trouble of amending rule 57 at all.\nThe Court could by simply adjourning the proceedings automatically continue the attachment without any express direction in that behalf.\nThe fact that the Court gave an express direction that the attachment should continue clearly indicates that the Court intended to make a final order of dismissal.\nAgain, the heading of column 20 in Exhibit F clearly indicates that only a final order is to be entered in that column.\nThe fact that the order was entered in that column affords some justification for the conclusion that the Court made a final order of dismissal.\nThat the claim case was automatically dropped is yet another indication that the execution case was at an end.\nThe fact that the judgment-debtor had paid the full costs of the execution case is also a feature which goes to show, to a certain extent at any rate if not deci- sively, that the execution proceeding was finally disposed of by the order.\nThe following endorsement appears on the petition Ex. 2 (a), dated June 2, 1939 Heard learned pleaders for the parties. They jointly ask me to cancel the attachment (existing by special order) in Money Ex. 118 of 1936 though that case was dismissed.\nThis endorsement also clearly shows that the Court itself understood that the order that it made on January 30 1937, was a final order of dismissal and that the attachment had been continued by a special order.\nOn a consideration of all these matters I have not the least doubt in my mind that the order of January 30, 1937, was in form and in substance a final order of dismissal of the Execution Case No. 118 of 1936 and that the attachment was continued by a special order such as is contemplated and authorised by the amend- ment made by the Calcutta High Court in rule 57.\nLearned advocate for the appellants contended that if the execution case came to an end the attachment could not be left hanging in the air.\nThere is no substance in this argument.\nOrdi- narily, an attachment is supported by an execution case and if the execution case is simply dismissed the attachment must fail with it.\nBut rule 57, as amended, expressly empow- ers the Court to dismiss an execution application but at the same time to keep alive the attachment by a special order. That is what was done in this case.\nHere the attachment does not, to use the expression of the learned advocate for the appellants, hang in the air.\nIt rests upon the solid foundation of a special order which rule 57, as amended, in terms authorises the Court to make.\nThe continuance of the attachment, in the circumstances, needs no execution proceeding to support it.\nTake the case of an attachment before judgment.\nUnder Order XXXVIII, rule 11, where after an order of attachment before judgment a decree is passed in favour of the plaintiff, it is not necessary upon an application for execution of such a decree to apply for re-attachment of the property.\nIt means that the attachment continues and the judgmentdebtor cannot deal with the property to the disadvantage of the decree- holder.\nAfter the decree is passed, the attachment continues but nobody will say that although there has been no applica- tion for the execution of the decree at any time by the decree-holder there is, nevertheless, an execution proceed- ing pending merely because the attachment continues.\nHere also the attachment subsists and rests only upon the terms of Order, XXXVIII rule 11, and without any proceeding.\nSuch attachment cannot be called a proceeding in execution, for none was ever initiated after the decree was passed.\nIn my judgment, the order of January 30, 1937, was a final order which brought the Execution Case No. 118 of 1936, to an and and the attachment continued, not because there was a pend- ing execution proceeding but because a special order was made under Order XXI, rule 57, as amended by the High Court.\nAs to (ii)--Learned advocate for the appellants then contended that the petition (Ex. 2a) dated June 2, 1939, amounted to a proceeding in execution and as that was insti- tuted and was pending after January 1, 1939 the proceedings came within the definition in section 2 (22)of a suit to which this Act applies.\nI do not think this argument is sound.\nThe petition (Ex.2a) was not really an application at all.\nSee Raja Shri Prakash Singh v. \n The Allahabad Bank Ltd. (1).\nIn substance, it was nothing but a certification by the decree-holder of the satisfaction of the decree.\nThe mere fact (1) 33 C.W.N. 267 A.I.R. 1929 P.C. 19, that the document was in the form of a petition could not convert what was really the usual certifying procedure into a proceeding in execution for recovery of a loan or for enforcement of any agreement.\nIt was purely an intimation given to the Court by the decreeholder that the decree had been satisfied out of Court and the prayer for withdrawal of the attachment was merely consequential and would follow as a matter of course on full satisfaction of the decree being recorded.\nThe order made on that petition also shows that the decree was recorded as adjusted and the attachment was cancelled.\nIn my judgment, that petition (Ex. 2a) was not an application such as would initiate a proceeding in execution for any of the purposes mentioned in clauses (a) or (b) or (c) of section 2 (22) of the Act.\nFor reasons stated above, the decrees sought to be reopened were not decrees made in a suit to which this Act applies.\nSuit No. 78 of 1922 was neither instituted on or after January 1, 1939, nor was it pending on that date, all the three decrees having been passed long before that date.\nNor was any proceeding in execution such as is contemplated by section 2 (22) instituted or pending on or after that date.\nThe Execution Case No. 118 of 1936 was at an end on January 30, 1937, and the petition of June 2, 1939, was not an application at all and was certainly not a proceeding in execution within the meaning of section 2 (22) of the Act.\nThis conclusion is sufficient to dismiss this appeal and it is not necessary for us to consider the other question raised by the respondent on the strength of section 36 (5) of the Act and I express no opinion on that question.\nThe result is that this appeal must stand dismissed with costs and I order accordingly.\n--I agree.", + "expert_5": "The judgment debtor has paid to the decree holder the costs of this execution amounting to Rs. 76-14-0, and he having made requests for this execution case being struck off for the present on keeping the attachment in force, the decreeholder has agreed to it.\nThe execution case is dismissed for non- prosecution--the attachment already effected in this case continuing. 30th January 1937. The entry under column 11 of that very exhibit reads as follows -- Claim case automatically drops as the execution case is dismissed. It is, therefore, rejected without any sort of adjudication. 30th January 1937.\nProvided that in exercise of these powers the Court shall not- (i) \n do anything which affects any decree of a Court, other than a decree in a suit to which the Act applies which was not fully satisfied by the first day of January, 1939, or The proviso makes it quite clear that in exercise of the powers the Court cannot reopen or otherwise affect a decree of a Court unless such decree is one which was passed in a suit to which this Act applies and which was not fully satisfied by January 1, 1939.\nIn the light of the decision of the Full Bench of the Calcutta High Court in Mrityunjay Mitra v. Satis Chandra Banerji(1) which was approved by the Privy Council in Jadu Nath Roy v. Kshitish Chandra Acharyya(2), it has not been contended, in view of the fact that the personal decree for the balance remained unsatisfied on January 1, 1939, that the decrees in Suit No. 78 of 1922 were fully satisfied within the meaning of the above proviso.\nIn this Act, unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context- \n Suit to which this Act applies means any suit or proceeding instituted or filed on or after the 1st day of January, 1939, or pending on that date and includes a pro- ceeding in execution-- (a) for the recovery of a loan advanced before or after the commencement of this Act (b) for the enforcement of any agreement entered into before or after the commencement of this Act, whether by way of settlement of account or otherwise, or of any security so taken, in respect of any loan advanced whether before or after the commencement of this Act or (c) for the redemption of any security given before or after the commencement of this Act in respect of any loan advanced whether before or after the commencement of this Act.\nThe construction put upon section 2 (22)by the Special Bench and the reasons given by them appear to us to be well-founded.\n-It is not disputed that the order of January 30, 1937, was made under Order XXI, rule57, as amended by the Calcutta High Court.\nWhere any property has been attached in execution of a decree but by reason of the decree-holders default the Court is unable to proceed further with the application for execution, it shall either dismiss the application or for any sufficient reason adjourn the proceedings to a future date. Upon the dismissal of such application the attachment shall cease.\nThe reason why rule 57 was introduced in the Code of 1908 has been explained by Rank in C.J. in Shibnath Singh Ray v. Sheikh Saberuddin Ahmad(3) as follows-- (1) 46 C.W.N. 557 A.I.R. 1942 Cal. 441. (2) 48 C.W.N, 406. I.L.R. 56 Cal. 416 at pp. 421-422 Rule 57 of Order XXI was a new provision introduced in 1908. It is evident from the language of the rule itself, and it is still more evident from the circumstances under which it was passed, that it was intended to provide a remedy for the grievance or inconvenience which is apt to arise, where, after an attachment in execution, the applica- tion for execution cannot further be proceeded with by reason of the decree-holders default.\nThe object of the last sentence in rule 57 is to settle the question whether, when the application in execution is dismissed any attachment made under that application should fall to the ground or should subsist, and the legislature has provided that it is to fall to the ground.\nIt was evidently with a view to preserve the advantage of a dismissal and at the same time to avoid the disadvantage of the rigid rule of cesser of the attachment that the Calcutta High Court amend- ed rule 57 by adding the words unless the Court shall make an order to the contrary at the end of the last sentence of that rule.\nThe rule thus amended leaves three courses open to the Executing Court in case it finds it difficult to proceed with the execution case by reason of the default of the decree-holder.\nIt may (1) adjourn the proceedings for good reason which will automatically keep the attachment alive or (2) simply dismiss the application which will automatically destroy the attachment\nor (3) dismiss the application but specifically keep alive the attachment by an express order.\nGreat stress was laid by the learned advocate for the appellants on the words struck off for the present occurring in the body of that petition. It will be noticed that those words formed part of the request of the judgmentdebtor which was being recited in the petition.\nIn the actual prayer portion the decree-holder did not use the words for the present but only asked the Court to strike off the execution case keeping the attachment in force.\nThe Court regarded the willingness of the the decree-holder to enter into a long and protracted negotiation with the judg- ment-debtor as evidence of unwillingness on the part of the decree-holder to diligently prosecute the execution proceedings and accordingly dismissed the execution case for non-prosecution but thought fit to expressly keep alive the attachment.\nIt is quite obvious that the Court made an order of the third kind mentioned above.\nThe three forms of order permissible under rule 57 as amended by the High Court are quite distinct and independent of each other and there is no room for their overlapping.\nIf the mere continuation of attachment will automatically convert an express order of dismissal of the execution application which is a final order into an order of adjournment which is not a final order then there was no point in the High Court taking the trouble of amending rule 57 at all.\nThe fact that the Court gave an express direction that the attachment should continue clearly indicates that the Court intended to make a final order of dismissal.\nThe fact that the order was entered in that column affords some justification for the conclusion that the Court made a final order of dismissal.\nThat the claim case was automatically dropped is yet another indication that the execution case was at an end.\nThe fact that the judgment-debtor had paid the full costs of the execution case is also a feature which goes to show, to a certain extent at any rate if not deci- sively, that the execution proceeding was finally disposed of by the order.\nThe following endorsement appears on the petition Ex. 2 (a), dated June 2, 1939 Heard learned pleaders for the parties. They jointly ask me to cancel the attachment (existing by special order) in Money Ex. 118 of 1936 though that case was dismissed. \n This endorsement also clearly shows that the Court itself understood that the order that it made on January 30 1937, was a final order of dismissal and that the attachment had been continued by a special order.\nOn a consideration of all these matters I have not the least doubt in my mind that the order of January 30, 1937, was in form and in substance a final order of dismissal of the Execution Case No. 118 of 1936 and that the attachment was continued by a special order such as is contemplated and authorised by the amend- ment made by the Calcutta High Court in rule 57.\nBut rule 57, as amended, expressly empow- ers the Court to dismiss an execution application but at the same time to keep alive the attachment by a special order. That is what was done in this case.\nIt rests upon the solid foundation of a special order which rule 57, as amended, in terms authorises the Court to make.\nThe continuance of the attachment, in the circumstances, needs no execution proceeding to support it. Take the case of an attachment before judgment. Under Order XXXVIII, rule 11, where after an order of attachment before judgment a decree is passed in favour of the plaintiff, it is not necessary upon an application for execution of such a decree to apply for re-attachment of the property. It means that the attachment continues and the judgmentdebtor cannot deal with the property to the disadvantage of the decree- holder. After the decree is passed, the attachment continues but nobody will say that although there has been no applica- tion for the execution of the decree at any time by the decree-holder there is, nevertheless, an execution proceed- ing pending merely because the attachment continues.\nthe order of January 30, 1937, was a final order which brought the Execution Case No. 118 of 1936, to an and and the attachment continued, not because there was a pend- ing execution proceeding but because a special order was made under Order XXI, rule 57, as amended by the High Court.\nThe petition (Ex.2a) was not really an application at all.\nSee Raja Shri Prakash Singh v. \n The Allahabad Bank Ltd. (1).\nThe mere fact (1) 33 C.W.N. 267 A.I.R. 1929 P.C. 19, that the document was in the form of a petition could not convert what was really the usual certifying procedure into a proceeding in execution for recovery of a loan or for enforcement of any agreement. It was purely an intimation given to the Court by the decreeholder that the decree had been satisfied out of Court and the prayer for withdrawal of the attachment was merely consequential and would follow as a matter of course on full satisfaction of the decree being recorded.\nThe order made on that petition also shows that the decree was recorded as adjusted and the attachment was cancelled\nthat petition (Ex. 2a) was not an application such as would initiate a proceeding in execution for any of the purposes mentioned in clauses (a) or (b) or (c) of section 2 (22) of the Act.\nFor reasons stated above, the decrees sought to be reopened were not decrees made in a suit to which this Act applies. Suit No. 78 of 1922 was neither instituted on or after January 1, 1939, nor was it pending on that date, all the three decrees having been passed long before that date. Nor was any proceeding in execution such as is contemplated by section 2 (22) instituted or pending on or after that date. The Execution Case No. 118 of 1936 was at an end on January 30, 1937, and the petition of June 2, 1939, was not an application at all and was certainly not a proceeding in execution within the meaning of section 2 (22) of the Act.\nThis conclusion is sufficient to dismiss this appeal\nThe result is that this appeal must stand dismissed\nKANIA C.J.--I agree." + }, + "1951_36": { + "expert_1": "This is a criminal appeal against a convic- tion under section 16 of the Punjab Trade Employees Act, 1940, as amended in 1943, read with section 7(1).\nThe appellant is a shopkeeper who owns and runs a shop in the Cantonment Area of Ferozepore. He has no employees within the meaning of the Act but is assisted by his son in running the shop. The shop is divided into two sections. In one, articles of haberdashery are sold in the other, articles of stationery. Section 7(1) of the Act as amended requires that Save as otherwise provided by this Act, every shop shall remain closed on a close day. Sub-section (2)(i) states that-- The choice of a close day shall rest with the owner or occupier of a shop and shall be intimated to the prescribed authority within etc. The appellant made the following choice. He elected to close the haberdashery section on Mondays and the stationery section on Saturdays and gave the necessary intimation to the prescribed authority to that effect. On Monday, the 17th of May, 1948, the appellants son sold a tin of boot polish to a customer from the haberdash- ery, section of the shop. The appellant was present in person at the time of the sale. Monday was a close day for the haberdashery section and so the appellant was prosecuted under section 16 read with section 7. \nThe trying Magistrate held that in selling the article of haberdashery on a close day and in not observing Monday as a close day the appellant had infringed the provisions of section 7(1) of the Act. He accordingly convicted him and imposed a fine of Rs. 20. A revision application to the High Court failed. The High Court held that as the appellant had failed to keep his shop closed one day in the week, his conviction was proper. A certificate for leave to appeal to this Court, on the ground that a substantial question of law relating to the Govern- ment of India Act, 1935, was involved, was granted and that is how we come to be seized of the matter. The learned counsel for the appellant contended that section 7 of the Act is ultra vires in that it does not fall under any of the items in either the Provincial or the Concurrent Legislative Lists in the Government of India Act, 1935.\nIn our opinion, the matter can come either under item No. 27 in List II or item No. 27 in List III.\nItem No. 27 in List II covers trade and commerce within the Province. In our opinion, a Provincial Government could, under that entry, regulate the hours, place, date and manner of sale of any particular commodity or commodities. It could, for example, state that the sale of explosives or other dangerous substances should only be in selected areas, at specified times or on specified days when extra precau- tions for the general safety of the public and those direct- ly concerned could be arranged for. \nThat would appear to be obvious. In the same way, it could, if it so pleased, say that there shall be no sales on a particular day, say a Sunday or a Friday, or on days of religious festivals and so forth. Instead of doing that, it has chosen to regulate the internal trade of the Province in this manner which is only one of the various ways in which it could have acted.\nThe matter can also be brought under item 27 in List III welfare of labour conditions of labour. The im- pugned section is a general one and applies to all kinds of shops that is to say, to those in which labour is employed as well as to those which are run by the owners and their families. The Act in which the section occurs is directed at regulating the hours of employment of persons who are employed in the business of shops or commercial establish- ments.\nTherefore, in so far as section 7 covers establish- ments where labour is employed, it is undoubtedly intra vires.\nBut it was argued that the section can have no appli- cation to shops which an owner runs with or without the assistance of his family. Reliance for this was placed on section 2-A (i) and (j) which is as follows 2-A. Nothing in this Act shall apply to-- \n persons employed in a managerial capacity and (j) the members of the family of the employer. It was argued that the sale was by the son. He is not affected by the Act.\nTherefore. he was entitled to sell and he could not sell unless the shop was kept open to enable him to do so.\nIn our opinion, this is fallacious because the conviction here is not for the sale but for keeping the shop open on a close day.\nSection 2-A (j) does not give the son a right to keep the shop open or, for that matter, a right to sell. All it says is that he, being a member of the family, shall not be affected by the provisions of the Act. Section 7(1), on the other hand, is directed against the owner of the shop, not against his family. It compels the owner to keep his shop closed one day in a week. \n It was then contended that if a person employed in a managerial capacity cannot be affected by the Act, then the appellant who was there in that capacity cannot be compelled to close the shop under section 7.\nIt happens in the present case that the owner and the manag- er are the same but the Act obviously makes provision for a class of case in which they are different.\nThe owner is obliged to close the shop one day in a week, though the manager of the shop can work without, for example, having the twenty-four consecutive hours of rest every week which section 7-A enjoins.\nThe appellants capacity as manager will have to be separated from his character as owner for this purpose.\nSection 2-A(i) does not control section 7 (1).\nLastly, it was argued that the scheme of the Act makes it plain that it is for ameliorating the conditions of labour employed in shops. It cannot therefore apply to shops in which no labour is employed, particularly when the family of the employer is expressly excluded from the purview of the Act.\nFor this reason also, it cannot fall under item 27 in List III.\nWe are of opinion that such a narrow interpre- tation cannot be placed upon the entry.\nThe legislature may have felt it necessary, in order to reduce the possibilities of evasion to a minimum, to encroach upon the liberties of those who would not otherwise have been affected. That we think it had power to do.", + "expert_2": "Section 7(1) of the Act as amended requires that Save as otherwise provided by this Act, every shop shall remain closed on a close day.\nthe appellants son sold a tin of boot polish to a customer from the haberdash- ery, section of the shop. The appellant was present in person at the time of the sale. Monday was a close day for the haberdashery section and so the appellant was prosecuted under section 16 read with section 7.\nsection 7 of the Act is ultra vires in that it does not fall under any of the items in either the Provincial or the Concurrent Legislative Lists in the Government of India Act, 1935. In our opinion, the matter can come either under item No. 27 in List II or item No. 27 in List III.\nItem No. 27 in List II covers trade and commerce within the Province. In our opinion, a Provincial Government could, under that entry, regulate the hours, place, date and manner of sale of any particular commodity or commodities.\nThe matter can also be brought under item 27 in List III welfare of labour conditions of labour. The im- pugned section is a general one and applies to all kinds of shops that is to say, to those in which labour is employed as well as to those which are run by the owners and their families.\nReliance for this was placed on section 2-A (i) and (j) which is as follows 2-A. Nothing in this Act shall apply to-- \n persons employed in a managerial capacity and (j) the members of the family of the employer. It was argued that the sale was by the son.\nthe conviction here is not for the sale but for keeping the shop open on a close day.\nSection 2-A (j) does not give the son a right to keep the shop open or, for that matter, a right to sell. All it says is that he, being a member of the family, shall not be affected by the provisions of the Act. Section 7(1), on the other hand, is directed against the owner of the shop, not against his family.\nIt was then contended that if a person employed in a managerial capacity cannot be affected by the Act, then the appellant who was there in that capacity cannot be compelled to close the shop under section 7.\nThe owner is obliged to close the shop one day in a week, though the manager of the shop can work without, for example, having the twenty-four consecutive hours of rest every week which section 7-A enjoins. The appellants capacity as manager will have to be separated from his character as owner for this purpose. Section 2-A(i) does not control section 7 (1).\nit was argued that the scheme of the Act makes it plain that it is for ameliorating the conditions of labour employed in shops. It cannot therefore apply to shops in which no labour is employed, particularly when the family of the employer is expressly excluded from the purview of the Act. For this reason also, it cannot fall under item 27 in List III.\nWe are of opinion that such a narrow interpre- tation cannot be placed upon the entry. The legislature may have felt it necessary, in order to reduce the possibilities of evasion to a minimum, to encroach upon the liberties of those who would not otherwise have been affected.", + "expert_3": "This is a criminal appeal against a convic- tion under section 16 of the Punjab Trade Employees Act, 1940, as amended in 1943, read with section 7(1)\nThe appellant is a shopkeeper who owns and runs a shop in the Cantonment Area of Ferozepore. He has no employees within the meaning of the Act but is assisted by his son in running the shop.\nThe shop is divided into two sections. In one, articles of haberdashery are sold in the other, articles of stationery.\nSection 7(1) of the Act as amended requires that Save as otherwise provided by this Act, every shop shall remain closed on a close day. Sub-section (2)(i) states that-- The choice of a close day shall rest with the owner or occupier of a shop and shall be intimated to the prescribed authority within etc.\nThe appellant made the following choice. He elected to close the haberdashery section on Mondays and the stationery section on Saturdays and gave the necessary intimation to the prescribed authority to that effect.\nOn Monday, the 17th of May, 1948, the appellants son sold a tin of boot polish to a customer from the haberdash- ery, section of the shop\nThe appellant was present in person at the time of the sale. Monday was a close day for the haberdashery section and so the appellant was prosecuted under section 16 read with section 7.\nThe trying Magistrate held that in selling the article of haberdashery on a close day and in not observing Monday as a close day the appellant had infringed the provisions of section 7(1) of the Act\nHe accordingly convicted him and imposed a fine of Rs. 20. A revision application to the High Court failed.\nThe High Court held that as the appellant had failed to keep his shop closed one day in the week, his conviction was proper\nA certificate for leave to appeal to this Court, on the ground that a substantial question of law relating to the Govern- ment of India Act, 1935, was involved, was granted and\nIn our opinion, the matter can come either under item No. 27 in List II or item No. 27 in List III.\nItem No. 27 in List II covers trade and commerce within the Province. In our opinion, a Provincial Government could, under that entry, regulate the hours, place, date and manner of sale of any particular commodity or commodities\nThe matter can also be brought under item 27 in List III welfare of labour conditions of labour. The im- pugned section is a general one and applies to all kinds of shops that is to say, to those in which labour is employed as well as to those which are run by the owners and their families. The Act in which the section occurs is directed at regulating the hours of employment of persons who are employed in the business of shops or commercial establish- ments\nTherefore, in so far as section 7 covers establish- ments where labour is employed, it is undoubtedly intra vires\nReliance for this was placed on section 2-A (i) and (j) which is as follows 2-A. Nothing in this Act shall apply to-- \n persons employed in a managerial capacity and (j) the members of the family of the employer. It was argued that the sale was by the son\nIn our opinion, this is fallacious because the conviction here is not for the sale but for keeping the shop open on a close day. Section 2-A (j) does not give the son a right to keep the shop open or, for that matter, a right to sell. All it says is that he, being a member of the family, shall not be affected by the provisions of the Act.\nSection 7(1), on the other hand, is directed against the owner of the shop, not against his family. It compels the owner to keep his shop closed one day in a week.\nIt happens in the present case that the owner and the manag- er are the same but the Act obviously makes provision for a class of case in which they are different\nThe owner is obliged to close the shop one day in a week, though the manager of the shop can work without, for example, having the twenty-four consecutive hours of rest every week which section 7-A enjoins. The appellants capacity as manager will have to be separated from his character as owner for this purpose\nSection 2-A(i) does not control section 7 (1).\nit was argued that the scheme of the Act makes it plain that it is for ameliorating the conditions of labour employed in shops. It cannot therefore apply to shops in which no labour is employed, particularly when the family of the employer is expressly excluded from the purview of the Act. For this reason also, it cannot fall under item 27 in List III.\nWe are of opinion that such a narrow interpre- tation cannot be placed upon the entry. The legislature may have felt it necessary, in order to reduce the possibilities of evasion to a minimum, to encroach upon the liberties of those who would not otherwise have been affected.", + "expert_4": "Appeal under Art. 134 (1) (c) of the Constitution of India against the Judgment and Order dated the 10th April, 1950, of the High Court of Judicature at Simla in Criminal Revision No. 449 of 1949.\nThis is a criminal appeal against a convic- tion under section 16 of the Punjab Trade Employees Act, 1940, as amended in 1943, read with section 7(1).\nThe appellant is a shopkeeper who owns and runs a shop in the Cantonment Area of Ferozepore.\nHe has no employees within the meaning of the Act but is assisted by his son in running the shop.\nThe shop is divided into two sections.\nIn one, articles of haberdashery are sold in the other, articles of stationery.\nSection 7(1) of the Act as amended requires that Save as otherwise provided by this Act, every shop shall remain closed on a close day.\nSub-section (2)(i) states that-- The choice of a close day shall rest with the owner or occupier of a shop and shall be intimated to the prescribed authority within etc.\nThe appellant made the following choice. He elected to close the haberdashery section on Mondays and the stationery section on Saturdays and gave the necessary intimation to the prescribed authority to that effect.\nOn Monday, the 17th of May, 1948, the appellants son sold a tin of boot polish to a customer from the haberdash- ery, section of the shop.\nThe appellant was present in person at the time of the sale.\nMonday was a close day for the haberdashery section and so the appellant was prosecuted under section 16 read with section 7.\nThe trying Magistrate held that in selling the article of haberdashery on a close day and in not observing Monday as a close day the appellant had infringed the provisions of section 7(1) of the Act.\nHe accordingly convicted him and imposed a fine of Rs. 20.\nA revision application to the High Court failed.\nThe High Court held that as the appellant had failed to keep his shop closed one day in the week, his conviction was proper.\nA certificate for leave to appeal to this Court, on the ground that a substantial question of law relating to the Govern- ment of India Act, 1935, was involved, was granted and that is how we come to be seized of the matter.\nThe learned counsel for the appellant contended that section 7 of the Act is ultra vires in that it does not fall under any of the items in either the Provincial or the Concurrent Legislative Lists in the Government of India Act, 1935.\nIn our opinion, the matter can come either under item No. 27 in List II or item No. 27 in List III.\nItem No. 27 in List II covers trade and commerce within the Province. In our opinion, a Provincial Government could, under that entry, regulate the hours, place, date and manner of sale of any particular commodity or commodities.\nIt could, for example, state that the sale of explosives or other dangerous substances should only be in selected areas, at specified times or on specified days when extra precau- tions for the general safety of the public and those direct- ly concerned could be arranged for. \nThat would appear to be obvious. In the same way, it could, if it so pleased, say that there shall be no sales on a particular day, say a Sunday or a Friday, or on days of religious festivals and so forth.\nInstead of doing that, it has chosen to regulate the internal trade of the Province in this manner which is only one of the various ways in which it could have acted.\nThe matter can also be brought under item 27 in List III welfare of labour conditions of labour.\nThe im- pugned section is a general one and applies to all kinds of shops that is to say, to those in which labour is employed as well as to those which are run by the owners and their families.\nThe Act in which the section occurs is directed at regulating the hours of employment of persons who are employed in the business of shops or commercial establish- ments.\nTherefore, in so far as section 7 covers establish- ments where labour is employed, it is undoubtedly intra vires.\nBut it was argued that the section can have no appli- cation to shops which an owner runs with or without the assistance of his family.\nReliance for this was placed on section 2-A (i) and (j) which is as follows\n2-A. Nothing in this Act shall apply to-- \n persons employed in a managerial capacity and (j) the members of the family of the employer.\nIt was argued that the sale was by the son.\nHe is not affected by the Act.\nTherefore. he was entitled to sell and he could not sell unless the shop was kept open to enable him to do so.\nSo also as regards the appel- lant, the owner, who was there in a managerial capacity.\nIn our opinion, this is fallacious because the conviction here is not for the sale but for keeping the shop open on a close day.\nSection 2-A (j) does not give the son a right to keep the shop open or, for that matter, a right to sell.\nAll it says is that he, being a member of the family, shall not be affected by the provisions of the Act. Section 7(1), on the other hand, is directed against the owner of the shop, not against his family.\nIt compels the owner to keep his shop closed one day in a week.\nIt was then contended that if a person employed in a managerial capacity cannot be affected by the Act, then the appellant who was there in that capacity cannot be compelled to close the shop under section 7. This is also fallacious.\nIt happens in the present case that the owner and the manag- er are the same but the Act obviously makes provision for a class of case in which they are different.\nThe owner is obliged to close the shop one day in a week, though the manager of the shop can work without, for example, having the twenty-four consecutive hours of rest every week which section 7-A enjoins.\nThe appellants capacity as manager will have to be separated from his character as owner for this purpose.\nSection 2-A(i) does not control section 7 (1).\nLastly, it was argued that the scheme of the Act makes it plain that it is for ameliorating the conditions of labour employed in shops\nIt cannot therefore apply to shops in which no labour is employed, particularly when the family of the employer is expressly excluded from the purview of the Act.\nFor this reason also, it cannot fall under item 27 in List III.\nWe are of opinion that such a narrow interpre- tation cannot be placed upon the entry.\nThe legislature may have felt it necessary, in order to reduce the possibilities of evasion to a minimum, to encroach upon the liberties of those who would not otherwise have been affected. That we think it had power to do.", + "expert_5": "Section 7(1) of the Act as amended requires that Save as otherwise provided by this Act, every shop shall remain closed on a close day. Sub-section (2)(i) states that-- The choice of a close day shall rest with the owner or occupier of a shop and shall be intimated to the prescribed authority within etc.\nThe appellant made the following choice. He elected to close the haberdashery section on Mondays and the stationery section on Saturdays and gave the necessary intimation to the prescribed authority to that effect.\nOn Monday, the 17th of May, 1948, the appellants son sold a tin of boot polish to a customer from the haberdash- ery, section of the shop. The appellant was present in person at the time of the sale. Monday was a close day for the haberdashery section and so the appellant was prosecuted under section 16 read with section 7.\nIn our opinion, the matter can come either under item No. 27 in List II or item No. 27 in List III. Item No. 27 in List II covers trade and commerce within the Province. In our opinion, a Provincial Government could, under that entry, regulate the hours, place, date and manner of sale of any particular commodity or commodities.\nIt could, for example, state that the sale of explosives or other dangerous substances should only be in selected areas, at specified times or on specified days when extra precau- tions for the general safety of the public and those direct- ly concerned could be arranged for. \nThat would appear to be obvious.\nIn the same way, it could, if it so pleased, say that there shall be no sales on a particular day, say a Sunday or a Friday, or on days of religious festivals and so forth. Instead of doing that, it has chosen to regulate the internal trade of the Province in this manner which is only one of the various ways in which it could have acted.\nThe matter can also be brought under item 27 in List III welfare of labour conditions of labour.\nThe im- pugned section is a general one and applies to all kinds of shops that is to say, to those in which labour is employed as well as to those which are run by the owners and their families.\nThe Act in which the section occurs is directed at regulating the hours of employment of persons who are employed in the business of shops or commercial establish- ments.\nTherefore, in so far as section 7 covers establish- ments where labour is employed, it is undoubtedly intra vires.\nIn our opinion, this is fallacious because the conviction here is not for the sale but for keeping the shop open on a close day.\nSection 2-A (j) does not give the son a right to keep the shop open or, for that matter, a right to sell. All it says is that he, being a member of the family, shall not be affected by the provisions of the Act.\nSection 7(1), on the other hand, is directed against the owner of the shop, not against his family. It compels the owner to keep his shop closed one day in a week.\nIt happens in the present case that the owner and the manag- er are the same but the Act obviously makes provision for a class of case in which they are different.\nThe owner is obliged to close the shop one day in a week, though the manager of the shop can work without, for example, having the twenty-four consecutive hours of rest every week which section 7-A enjoins. The appellants capacity as manager will have to be separated from his character as owner for this purpose.\nSection 2-A(i) does not control section 7 (1).\nThe legislature may have felt it necessary, in order to reduce the possibilities of evasion to a minimum, to encroach upon the liberties of those who would not otherwise have been affected." + }, + "1951_40": { + "expert_1": "The sole controversy in this appeal centres round the point as to whether or not excess profits tax is payable on the sum of Rs. 20,005 received by the respondent from Messrs Parakh Co. by way of rent for the dyeing plant let out to them during the chargeable accounting period. The respondent (Sri Lakshmi Silk Mills Ltd.) is a manu- facturer of silk cloth, and as a part of its business it installed a plant for dyeing silk yarn. During the charge- able accounting period (1st January, 1943, to 31st December, 1943) owing to difficulty in obtaining silk yarn on account of the war it could make no use of this plant and it re- mained idle for some time. On the 20th August, 1943, it was let out to Messrs E. Parakh Co. on a rent of Rs. 4,001 per month. The Excess Profits Tax Officer by his assessment order dated 11th June, 1945, included the sum of Rs. 20,005 realized as rent for five months, in the profits of the business of the respondent and held that excess profits tax was payable on this amount. \nThis order was confirmed on appeal by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and on fur- ther appeal by the Income-tax Tribunal. The Tribunal, however, on being asked referred the following question of law to the High Court for its opinion Whether in the circumstances of the case, the asses- sees income of Rs. 20,005 is profits from business within the meaning of section 2 (5) of the Excess Profits Tax Act and therefore or otherwise liable to pay excess profits tax ? The High Court answered the question in the negative. \nThis is an appeal by special leave from this decision.\nIt was contended on behalf of the Commissioner before the High Court that the dyeing plant was a commercial asset of the assessees business for the purpose of earning profit and if this commercial asset yielded income to him in any particular manner, it was income from the assessees busi- ness for the purpose of the Excess Profits Tax Act. It was said that it was immaterial whether a commercial asset yields income by use of the assessee himself or its being used by someone else.\nI can understand the principle for which Mr. Joshi is contending that it makes no difference what an assessee does with a commercial asset belonging to him. \nHe may use it as he likes. So long as it yields income it is the income of his business.\nVar- ious cases have been cited at the Bar and I think that those cases though apparently conflicting are reconcilable if we accept this principle to be the correct principle and apply this ratio as the ratio emerging from these cases and I will state the principle and the ratio again that if an assessee derives income from a commercial asset which is capable at the time of being used as a commercial asset, then it is income from his business, whether he uses that commercial asset himself or lets it out to somebody else to be used. \nBut if the commercial asset is not capable of being used as such, then its being let out does not result in an income which is the income of the business.\nIt is difficult to hold that the income thus earned by the commer- cial asset is not income from the business of the company that has been solely incorporated for the purpose of doing business and earning profits. There is no material whatever for taking the view that the assessee company was incorpo- rated with any other object than of carrying on business or trade.\nThese latter cases may legitimately fall under the specific provisions of section 9 or section 12, though the High Courts in this country are by no means unanimous on this subject but for the purpose of this case it is unnecessary to resolve that conflict. It may be observed that no general principle can be laid down which is applicable to all cases, and each case has to be decided on its own circumstances.\nWe, however, are in respectful agreement with the observations of Lord President Strathclyde in Sutherland v. The Commissioners of Inland Revenue(1) that if a commercial asset is susceptible of being put to a variety of different uses in which gain might be acquired, whichever of these uses it was put to by the appellant, the profit earned was a user of the asset of the same business. \nA mere substituted use of the commercial asset does not change or alter the nature of that asset. Whatever the commercial asset produces is income of the business of which it is an asset, the process by which the asset makes the income being immaterial.\nThe argument, in our opinion, though attractive, is fallacious. The analogy between the case of land and of a dyeing plant for the purpose of taxing stat- utes is inappropriate.\nThe distinction becomes apparent from the following passage which occurs in Atkinson J.s judgment in I less case(2) -- Then it was suggested by counsel for the Crown that the case was like the Desoutter case(3), where it was held that, if you make use of a patent in your business and also receive royalties from the use of the patent by others licensed to use it, those royalties cannot be regarded as receipts from an investment. In other words, the door has to be either open or shut. A patent is either an investment or it is not. The suggestion was that freehold land is in the same position, and if you carry on business on part of it, whatever you do with the rest by way of licensing or letting cannot be regarded as producing income from investment. That, however, is dead in the teeth of the judgment in the Broadway Car Co. case(4).\nThese observations appositely apply to the case of a company incorporated for the purpose of doing business and earning profit by the process of manufacture. Letting out a part of its machinery in a certain situation in order to make the business advantageous as a whole does not alter the nature of the income.\nThe observations therefore made in I less case(2) can have no apposite application to the case of a manufacturing concern letting out a part of its machinery temporarily which it cannot advantageously use itself.\nThe short question to decide in this case is whether on the facts found, it could be said reasonably that the dyeing plant had become redundant for its business as a silk manu- facturing concern, simply by the circumstance that for the time being it could not be used by it personally for the purpose of dyeing silk yarn owing to the non-availability of yarn. It is difficult to conceive that the company would not have immediately started dyeing yarn as soon as it became available. Instead of dyeing yarn, another person was allowed to dye jute (we are told), the assessee company making income out of its use as a commercial asset.", + "expert_2": "The sole controversy in this appeal centres round the point as to whether or not excess profits tax is payable on the sum of Rs. 20,005 received by the respondent from Messrs Parakh Co. by way of rent for the dyeing plant let out to them during the chargeable accounting period.\nDuring the charge- able accounting period (1st January, 1943, to 31st December, 1943) owing to difficulty in obtaining silk yarn on account of the war it could make no use of this plant and it re- mained idle for some time. On the 20th August, 1943, it was let out to Messrs E.\nthe dyeing plant was a commercial asset of the assessees business for the purpose of earning profit and if this commercial asset yielded income to him in any particular manner, it was income from the assessees busi- ness for the purpose of the Excess Profits Tax Act. It was said that it was immaterial whether a commercial asset yields income by use of the assessee himself or its being used by someone else.\nthe commercial asset must be at the time it was let out in a condition to be used as a commercial asset by the assessee. \nIf it has ceased to be a commercial asset, if its use as a commercial asset has been discontinued, then if the assessee lets it out, he is not putting to use something which is a commercial asset at the time. Now, on the facts found by the Tribunal, it is clear that when the assessee let out this dyeing plant, it had remained idle for some time.\nif an assessee derives income from a commercial asset which is capable at the time of being used as a commercial asset, then it is income from his business, whether he uses that commercial asset himself or lets it out to somebody else to be used.\nif the commercial asset has ceased to be a commercial asset in the hands of the assessee and thereafter he gets what he can out of it by letting it out to be used by others, then the rent he receives is not income from any business that he carries on.\nThe yield of income by a commercial asset is the profit of the business irrespective of the manner in which. that asset is exploited by the owner of the business.\nIt is difficult to hold that the income thus earned by the commer- cial asset is not income from the business of the company that has been solely incorporated for the purpose of doing business and earning profits.\nLord President Strathclyde in Sutherland v. The Commissioners of Inland Revenue(1) that if a commercial asset is susceptible of being put to a variety of different uses in which gain might be acquired, whichever of these uses it was put to by the appellant, the profit earned was a user of the asset of the same business. \nA mere substituted use of the commercial asset does not change or alter the nature of that asset. Whatever the commercial asset produces is income of the business of which it is an asset, the process by which the asset makes the income being immaterial.\nInland Revenue Commissioners v. lies(2) and it should be similarly decided. In that case the taxpayer carried on the business of sand and gravel merchant on certain land and at the same time he granted licences to three firms to enter his land and win gravel for themselves in return for which he received from them a royalty for each cubic yard of gravel taken away. It was held that the royalties were not part of the profits of the business because, in granting the licences, the taxpayer was exploit- ing his rights of ownership in the land and was not carrying on his business of a sand and gravel merchant. \nThe income was held taxable as an income from an investment and did not fall under Schedule D which concerns profits earned from a trade.\nThe analogy between the case of land and of a dyeing plant for the purpose of taxing stat- utes is inappropriate. \nThe distinction becomes apparent from the following passage which occurs in Atkinson J.s judgment in I less case(2) -- Then it was suggested by counsel for the Crown that the case was like the Desoutter case(3), where it was held that, if you make use of a patent in your business and also receive royalties from the use of the patent by others licensed to use it, those royalties cannot be regarded as receipts from an investment.\nThese observations appositely apply to the case of a company incorporated for the purpose of doing business and earning profit by the process of manufacture. Letting out a part of its machinery in a certain situation in order to make the business advantageous as a whole does not alter the nature of the income.\nit was observed that in that case they were dealing with part of the property of the company which had come redundant and was sublet purely to produce income--a transaction. quite apart from the ordinary business activities of the company.", + "expert_3": "The sole controversy in this appeal centres round the point as to whether or not excess profits tax is payable on the sum of Rs. 20,005 received by the respondent from Messrs Parakh Co. by way of rent for the dyeing plant let out to them during the chargeable accounting period.\nThe respondent (Sri Lakshmi Silk Mills Ltd.) is a manu- facturer of silk cloth, and as a part of its business it installed a plant for dyeing silk yarn\nDuring the charge- able accounting period (1st January, 1943, to 31st December, 1943) owing to difficulty in obtaining silk yarn on account of the war it could make no use of this plant and it re- mained idle for some time.\nOn the 20th August, 1943, it was let out to Messrs E. Parakh Co. on a rent of Rs. 4,001 per month.\nThe Excess Profits Tax Officer by his assessment order dated 11th June, 1945, included the sum of Rs. 20,005 realized as rent for five months, in the profits of the business of the respondent and held that excess profits tax was payable on this amount\nThis order was confirmed on appeal by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and on fur- ther appeal by the Income-tax Tribunal. The Tribunal, however, on being asked referred the following question of law to the High Court for its opinion Whether in the circumstances of the case, the asses- sees income of Rs. 20,005 is profits from business within the meaning of section 2 (5) of the Excess Profits Tax Act and therefore or otherwise liable to pay excess profits tax ?\nThe High Court answered the question in the negative\nThis is an appeal by special leave from this decision.\nIt was contended on behalf of the Commissioner before the High Court that the dyeing plant was a commercial asset of the assessees business for the purpose of earning profit and if this commercial asset yielded income to him in any particular manner, it was income from the assessees busi- ness for the purpose of the Excess Profits Tax Act. It was said that it was immaterial whether a commercial asset yields income by use of the assessee himself or its being used by someone else. This contention was disposed of by the learned Chief Justice in these words - Mr. Joshi seems to be right but with this qualification that the commercial asset must be at the time it was let out in a condition to be used as a commercial asset by the assessee.\nIf it has ceased to be a commercial asset, if its use as a commercial asset has been discontinued, then if the assessee lets it out, he is not putting to use something which is a commercial asset at the time\nNow, on the facts found by the Tribunal, it is clear that when the assessee let out this dyeing plant, it had remained idle for some time. \nHe could not obtain silk yarn on account of the war and therefore it was not possible to make use of it as a commercial asset as far as the assessee himself was concerned and it was only for that reason that he let it out to Messrs E. Parakh Co.\nI will state the principle and the ratio again that if an assessee derives income from a commercial asset which is capable at the time of being used as a commercial asset, then it is income from his business, whether he uses that commercial asset himself or lets it out to somebody else to be used. \nBut if the commercial asset is not capable of being used as such, then its being let out does not result in an income which is the income of the business.\nThe learned Attorney-General pointed out that the nature of a commercial asset is not changed because a par- ticular person is unable to use it. The inability of the assessee to make use of it in certain circumstances does not in any way affect the nature of the asset and cause an infirmity in the asset itself. \nIt was contended that when the dyeing plant became idle for a short time during the chargeable accounting period it did not cease to be a com- mercial asset of the respondent for it had no other busi- ness that all the assets of the respondent including the dyeing plant were the assets of the business, that whatever income was derived by the use of these assets including the income that an asset fetched by its being let out was the business income of the assessee, and that there was no warrant in law for the proposition that a commercial asset which yields income must be used as an asset by the respondent himself before its income becomes chargeable to tax.\nIn our opinion, the contention raised by the learned Attorney-General is sound.\nThe High Court was in error in engrafting a proviso on the rule deduced by it from the authorities considered by it, to the effect that a commer- cial asset of a business concern which yields income must at the time it was let out be in a condition to be used as a commercial asset by the assessee himself. We respectfully concur in the opinion of the learned Chief Justice that if the commercial asset is not capable of being used as such, then its being let out to others does not result in an income which is the income of the business, but we cannot accept the view that an asset which was acquired and used for the purpose of the business ceased to be a commercial asset of that business as soon as it was temporarily put out of use or let out to another person for use in his business or trade.\nThe yield of income by a commercial asset is the profit of the business irrespective of the manner in which. that asset is exploited by the owner of the business.\nHe is entitled to exploit it to his best advantage and he may do so either by using it himself personally or by letting it out to somebody else.\nIn this case the company was incorporated purely as a manufacturing concern with the object of making profit.\nIt installed plant and machinery for the purpose of its business, and it was open to it if at any time it found that any part of its plant for the time being could not be advantageously employed for earning profit by the company itself, to earn profit by leasing it to somebody else. It is difficult to hold that the income thus earned by the commer- cial asset is not income from the business of the company that has been solely incorporated for the purpose of doing business and earning profits\nOwning properties and letting them was not a purpose for which it was formed and that being so, the disputed income cannot be said to fall under any section of the Indian Income-tax Act other than section 10. Cases of undertakings of this nature stand on an entirely different footing and are distinguishable from cases of individuals or companies acquiring lands or buildings and making income by letting them on hire\nThese latter cases may legitimately fall under the specific provisions of section 9 or section 12\nif a commercial asset is susceptible of being put to a variety of different uses in which gain might be acquired, whichever of these uses it was put to by the appellant, the profit earned was a user of the asset of the same business.\nA mere substituted use of the commercial asset does not change or alter the nature of that asset. Whatever the commercial asset produces is income of the business of which it is an asset, the process by which the asset makes the income being immaterial\nThe analogy between the case of land and of a dyeing plant for the purpose of taxing stat- utes is inappropriate\nThe distinction becomes apparent from the following passage which occurs in Atkinson J.s judgment in I less case(2) -- Then it was suggested by counsel for the Crown that the case was like the Desoutter case(3), where it was held that, if you make use of a patent in your business and also receive royalties from the use of the patent by others licensed to use it, those royalties cannot be regarded as receipts from an investment\nIn other words, the door has to be either open or shut.\nThese observations appositely apply to the case of a company incorporated for the purpose of doing business and earning profit by the process of manufacture. Letting out a part of its machinery in a certain situation in order to make the business advantageous as a whole does not alter the nature of the income\nThe short question to decide in this case is whether on the facts found, it could be said reasonably that the dyeing plant had become redundant for its business as a silk manu- facturing concern, simply by the circumstance that for the time being it could not be used by it personally for the purpose of dyeing silk yarn owing to the non-availability of yarn. It is difficult to conceive that the company would not have immediately started dyeing yarn as soon as it became available. Instead of dyeing yarn, another person was allowed to dye jute (we are told), the assessee company making income out of its use as a commercial asset.", + "expert_4": "The sole controversy in this appeal centres round the point as to whether or not excess profits tax is payable on the sum of Rs. 20,005 received by the respondent from Messrs Parakh Co. by way of rent for the dyeing plant let out to them during the chargeable accounting period.\nThe respondent (Sri Lakshmi Silk Mills Ltd.) is a manu- facturer of silk cloth, and as a part of its business it installed a plant for dyeing silk yarn.\nDuring the charge- able accounting period (1st January, 1943, to 31st December, 1943) owing to difficulty in obtaining silk yarn on account of the war it could make no use of this plant and it re- mained idle for some time.\nOn the 20th August, 1943, it was let out to Messrs E.\nParakh Co. on a rent of Rs. 4,001 per month.\nThe Excess Profits Tax Officer by his assessment order dated 11th June, 1945, included the sum of Rs. 20,005 realized as rent for five months, in the profits of the business of the respondent and held that excess profits tax was payable on this amount.\nThis order was confirmed on appeal by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and on fur- ther appeal by the Income-tax Tribunal.\nThe Tribunal, however, on being asked referred the following question of law to the High Court for its opinion Whether in the circumstances of the case, the asses- sees income of Rs. 20,005 is profits from business within the meaning of section 2 (5) of the Excess Profits Tax Act and therefore or otherwise liable to pay excess profits tax ?\nThe High Court answered the question in the negative.\nThis is an appeal by special leave from this decision.\nIt was contended on behalf of the Commissioner before the High Court that the dyeing plant was a commercial asset of the assessees business for the purpose of earning profit and if this commercial asset yielded income to him in any particular manner, it was income from the assessees busi- ness for the purpose of the Excess Profits Tax Act.\nIt was said that it was immaterial whether a commercial asset yields income by use of the assessee himself or its being used by someone else.\nThis contention was disposed of by the learned Chief Justice in these words - Mr. Joshi seems to be right but with this qualification that the commercial asset must be at the time it was let out in a condition to be used as a commercial asset by the assessee.\nIf it has ceased to be a commercial asset, if its use as a commercial asset has been discontinued, then if the assessee lets it out, he is not putting to use something which is a commercial asset at the time.\nNow, on the facts found by the Tribunal, it is clear that when the assessee let out this dyeing plant, it had remained idle for some time\nHe could not obtain silk yarn on account of the war and therefore it was not possible to make use of it as a commercial asset as far as the assessee himself was concerned and it was only for that reason that he let it out to Messrs E.\nI can understand the principle for which Mr. Joshi is contending that it makes no difference what an assessee does with a commercial asset belonging to him.\nHe may use it as he likes.\nSo long as it yields income it is the income of his business.\nVar- ious cases have been cited at the Bar and I think that those cases though apparently conflicting are reconcilable if we accept this principle to be the correct principle and apply this ratio as the ratio emerging from these cases and I will state the principle and the ratio again that if an assessee derives income from a commercial asset which is capable at the time of being used as a commercial asset, then it is income from his business, whether he uses that commercial asset himself or lets it out to somebody else to be used.\nif the commercial asset is not capable of being used as such, then its being let out does not result in an income which is the income of the business.\nMr. Justice Tendolkar concurred in this view and ob- served as follows -- The ratio of all these cases to my mind is that if there is a commercial asset which is capable of being worked by the assessee himself for the purpose of earning profits and the assessee instead of doing so, either voluntarily allows someone else to use it on payment of a certain sum or is compelled by law to allow it to be used in such manner, then what he receives is income from business.\nBut if the commercial asset has ceased to be a commercial asset in the hands of the assessee and thereafter he gets what he can out of it by letting it out to be used by others, then the rent he receives is not income from any business that he carries on.\nThe learned Attorney-General pointed out that the nature of a commercial asset is not changed because a par- ticular person is unable to use it.\nThe inability of the assessee to make use of it in certain circumstances does not in any way affect the nature of the asset and cause an infirmity in the asset itself.\nIt was contended that when the dyeing plant became idle for a short time during the chargeable accounting period it did not cease to be a com- mercial asset of the respondent for it had no other busi- ness that all the assets of the respondent including the dyeing plant were the assets of the business, that whatever income was derived by the use of these assets including the income that an asset fetched by its being let out was the business income of the assessee, and that there was no warrant in law for the proposition that a commercial asset which yields income must be used as an asset by the respondent himself before its income becomes chargeable to tax.\nThe learned counsel for the respondent urged that as soon as the assessee found difficulty in obtaining yarn the dyeing plant became redundant for its business and ceased to be an asset of its business and any income derived from the rent by letting out this asset was income received by the assessee from other sources and therefore was not charge- able to excess profits tax.\nIn our opinion, the contention raised by the learned Attorney-General is sound.\nThe High Court was in error in engrafting a proviso on the rule deduced by it from the authorities considered by it, to the effect that a commer- cial asset of a business concern which yields income must at the time it was let out be in a condition to be used as a commercial asset by the assessee himself.\nWe respectfully concur in the opinion of the learned Chief Justice that if the commercial asset is not capable of being used as such, then its being let out to others does not result in an income which is the income of the business, but we cannot accept the view that an asset which was acquired and used for the purpose of the business ceased to be a commercial asset of that business as soon as it was temporarily put out of use or let out to another person for use in his business or trade.\nThe yield of income by a commercial asset is the profit of the business irrespective of the manner in which. that asset is exploited by the owner of the business.\nHe is entitled to exploit it to his best advantage and he may do so either by using it himself personally or by letting it out to somebody else.\nSuppose, for instance, in a manufac- turing concern the use of its plant and machinery can advan- tageously be made owing to paucity of raw materials only for six hours in a working day, and in order to get the best yield out of it, another person who has got the requisite raw materials is allowed to use it as a licensee on payment of certain consideration for three hours can it be said in such a situation with any justification that the amount realized from the licensee is not a part of the business income of the licensor.\nIn this case the company was incorporated purely as a manufacturing concern with the object of making profit.\nIt installed plant and machinery for the purpose of its business, and it was open to it if at any time it found that any part of its plant for the time being could not be advantageously employed for earning profit by the company itself, to earn profit by leasing it to somebody else.\nIt is difficult to hold that the income thus earned by the commer- cial asset is not income from the business of the company that has been solely incorporated for the purpose of doing business and earning profits.\nThere is no material whatever for taking the view that the assessee company was incorpo- rated with any other object than of carrying on business or trade.\nOwning properties and letting them was not a purpose for which it was formed and that being so, the disputed income cannot be said to fall under any section of the Indian Income-tax Act other than section 10.\nCases of undertakings of this nature stand on an entirely different footing and are distinguishable from cases of individuals or companies acquiring lands or buildings and making income by letting them on hire.\nThese latter cases may legitimately fall under the specific provisions of section 9 or section 12, though the High Courts in this country are by no means unanimous on this subject but for the purpose of this case it is unnecessary to resolve that conflict.\nIt may be observed that no general principle can be laid down which is applicable to all cases, and each case has to be decided on its own circumstances.\nDecisions of the Eng- lish courts given under the Finance Acts, the scheme of which is different from the Indian Income-tax statutes, are not always very helpful in dealing with matters arising under the Indian law and analogies and inferences drawn from those decisions are at times misleading.\nWe, however, are in respectful agreement with the observations of Lord President Strathclyde in Sutherland v.\nThe Commissioners of Inland Revenue(1) that if a commercial asset is susceptible of being put to a variety of different uses in which gain might be acquired, whichever of these uses it was put to by the appellant, the profit earned was a user of the asset of the same business.\nA mere substituted use of the commercial asset does not change or alter the nature of that asset.\nWhatever the commercial asset produces is income of the business of which it is an asset, the process by which the asset makes the income being immaterial.\nMr. Chatterjee for the respondent stressed the point that as the dyeing plant in the present case could not be made use of by the assessee in its manufacturing business owing to the non-availability of yarn, it ceased to be a commercial asset of the business of the assessee and became redundant to that business and that being so, any income earned by this asset which had ceased to be a commercial asset was not an income of the business but must be held to have been derived from a source other than business and fell within the ambit of section 12 of the Indian Income tax Act, and on this income excess profits tax was not payable.\nHe contended that the facts of this case were analogous to the case of Inland Revenue Commissioners v. lies(2) and it should be similarly decided.\nIn that case the taxpayer carried on the business of sand and gravel merchant on certain land and at the same time he granted licences to three firms to enter his land and win gravel for themselves in return for which he received from them a royalty for each cubic yard of gravel taken away.\nIt was held that the royalties were not part of the profits of the business because, in granting the licences, the taxpayer was exploit- ing his rights of ownership in the land and was not carrying on his business of a sand and gravel merchant\nThe income was held taxable as an income from an investment and did not fall under Schedule D which concerns profits earned from a trade.\nMr. Chatterjee also laid emphasis on the observations of Lord (1) (1918) 12 Tax Cas. 63. (2) 1947 1 A.E.R. 798. Greene M.R. in Croft v. Sywell Aerodrome Ltd. (1), wherein the learned Master of the Rolls observed as fol- lows I cannot myself see that a person who leases the land to others, or grants licences to others to come upon it, is doing anything more than exploiting his own rights of property, even if the tenant or licensee is, by the terms of the lease or licence, entitled himself to carry on a trade on the land.\nIt was urged that what the assessee was doing in this case was exploiting his rights of property by letting the dyeing plant to other persons precisely in the same manner as the owner of land in the case cited above was exploiting his own rights to property by granting a licence to another to come on his land.\nThe argument, in our opinion, though attractive, is fallacious.\nThe analogy between the case of land and of a dyeing plant for the purpose of taxing stat- utes is inappropriate.\nThe distinction becomes apparent from the following passage which occurs in Atkinson J.s judgment in I less case(2) -- Then it was suggested by counsel for the Crown that the case was like the Desoutter case(3), where it was held that, if you make use of a patent in your business and also receive royalties from the use of the patent by others licensed to use it, those royalties cannot be regarded as receipts from an investment.\nIn other words, the door has to be either open or shut.\nA patent is either an investment or it is not.\nThe suggestion was that freehold land is in the same position, and if you carry on business on part of it, whatever you do with the rest by way of licensing or letting cannot be regarded as producing income from investment.\nThat, however, is dead in the teeth of the judgment in the Broadway Car Co. case(4).\nThe same argument was tried there, but Tucker L.J. said he thought the Desoutter case(3) had very little to do with it, as there was a great difference between land (1) 1942 1 A.E.R. 110. (3) 1946 1 \n E.R. 58. (2) 1947 1 A.E.R. 798 (4) 1946 2 \n E.R. 609. and a patent, and he did not think the Desoutter case(1) threw any light on the matter A patent is quite different from freehold land.\nThese observations appositely apply to the case of a company incorporated for the purpose of doing business and earning profit by the process of manufacture.\nLetting out a part of its machinery in a certain situation in order to make the business advantageous as a whole does not alter the nature of the income.\nThe case of an owner of land letting out his land and carrying on exploitation of part of that land by selling gravel out of it, as at present advised, in our opinion, would fall under section 9 of the Indian In- come-tax Act, as income earned, no matter by whatever meth- od, from land, and specifically dealt with by that section.\nThe observations therefore made in I less case(2) can have no apposite application to the case of a manufacturing concern letting out a part of its machinery temporarily which it cannot advantageously use itself.\nMr. Chatterjee also laid stress on the decision of the Court of Appeal in Inland Revenue Commissioners v. Broadway Car Co. Ltd.(3). In this case the company carried on the business of motor car agents and repairers on land held on lease from 1935 to 1956 at an annual rent of pound 750. By 1940 the companys business had dwindled under war condi- tions to such an extent that no more than one third of the land was required. \n In those circumstances the remainder was sublet for fourteen years at an annual rent of pound 1,150. The general commissioners of income-tax decided that the difference of pound 400 between the outgoing of pound 750 for the land retained and the incoming of pound 1,150 for the land disposed of was income received from an invest- ment, and, the business not being one within the special categories mentioned in the Finance Act, 1939, that pound 400 was not taxable\nIt was held that the word investment must be construed in the ordinary, popular sense of the word as used by businessmen and not as a (1) 1946 1 A.E.R.58. (3) 1946 2 A.E.R. 609. (2) 1947 1 A.E.R. 798. term of art having a defined or technical meaning and that it was impossible to say that the commissioners had erred in law in coming to the conclusion that the transaction result- ed in an investment.\nScott L.J. in delivering his judgment laid emphasis on the point that after the business of the company had dwindled, it partitioned part of the land from the rest and sublet it by installing a heating apparatus for the sub-lessee.\nIt was found that war conditions had reduced the companys business to very small proportions and they cut their loss by going out of business in respect of the major part of their land and put it out of their power for 14 years to resume business there.\nIn this situation it was observed that in that case they were dealing with part of the property of the company which had come redundant and was sublet purely to produce income--a transaction. quite apart from the ordinary business activities of the company.\nIt was pointed out that the question whether a particular source of income was income or not must be decided, as it could be, according to ordinary commonsense principles.\nThe short question to decide in this case is whether on the facts found, it could be said reasonably that the dyeing plant had become redundant for its business as a silk manu- facturing concern, simply by the circumstance that for the time being it could not be used by it personally for the purpose of dyeing silk yarn owing to the non-availability of yarn.\nIt is difficult to conceive that the company would not have immediately started dyeing yarn as soon as it became available.\nInstead of dyeing yarn, another person was allowed to dye jute (we are told), the assessee company making income out of its use as a commercial asset.", + "expert_5": "the nature of a commercial asset is not changed because a par- ticular person is unable to use it.\nThe inability of the assessee to make use of it in certain circumstances does not in any way affect the nature of the asset and cause an infirmity in the asset itself.\nThe High Court was in error in engrafting a proviso on the rule deduced by it from the authorities considered by it, to the effect that a commer- cial asset of a business concern which yields income must at the time it was let out be in a condition to be used as a commercial asset by the assessee himself.\nif the commercial asset is not capable of being used as such, then its being let out to others does not result in an income which is the income of the business\nbut we cannot accept the view that an asset which was acquired and used for the purpose of the business ceased to be a commercial asset of that business as soon as it was temporarily put out of use or let out to another person for use in his business or trade.\nThe yield of income by a commercial asset is the profit of the business irrespective of the manner in which. that asset is exploited by the owner of the business. \nHe is entitled to exploit it to his best advantage and he may do so either by using it himself personally or by letting it out to somebody else.\nSuppose, for instance, in a manufac- turing concern the use of its plant and machinery can advan- tageously be made owing to paucity of raw materials only for six hours in a working day, and in order to get the best yield out of it, another person who has got the requisite raw materials is allowed to use it as a licensee on payment of certain consideration for three hours can it be said in such a situation with any justification that the amount realized from the licensee is not a part of the business income of the licensor. \nIn this case the company was incorporated purely as a manufacturing concern with the object of making profit. It installed plant and machinery for the purpose of its business, and it was open to it if at any time it found that any part of its plant for the time being could not be advantageously employed for earning profit by the company itself, to earn profit by leasing it to somebody else. It is difficult to hold that the income thus earned by the commer- cial asset is not income from the business of the company that has been solely incorporated for the purpose of doing business and earning profits. There is no material whatever for taking the view that the assessee company was incorpo- rated with any other object than of carrying on business or trade. Owning properties and letting them was not a purpose for which it was formed and that being so, the disputed income cannot be said to fall under any section of the Indian Income-tax Act other than section 10.\nCases of undertakings of this nature stand on an entirely different footing and are distinguishable from cases of individuals or companies acquiring lands or buildings and making income by letting them on hire.\nThese latter cases may legitimately fall under the specific provisions of section 9 or section 12\nWe, however, are in respectful agreement with the observations of Lord President Strathclyde in Sutherland v. The Commissioners of Inland Revenue(1) that if a commercial asset is susceptible of being put to a variety of different uses in which gain might be acquired, whichever of these uses it was put to by the appellant, the profit earned was a user of the asset of the same business.\nA mere substituted use of the commercial asset does not change or alter the nature of that asset.\nWhatever the commercial asset produces is income of the business of which it is an asset, the process by which the asset makes the income being immaterial.\nThe analogy between the case of land and of a dyeing plant for the purpose of taxing stat- utes is inappropriate.\nThe distinction becomes apparent from the following passage which occurs in Atkinson J.s judgment in I less case(2) -- Then it was suggested by counsel for the Crown that the case was like the Desoutter case(3), where it was held that, if you make use of a patent in your business and also receive royalties from the use of the patent by others licensed to use it, those royalties cannot be regarded as receipts from an investment.\nThe suggestion was that freehold land is in the same position, and if you carry on business on part of it, whatever you do with the rest by way of licensing or letting cannot be regarded as producing income from investment. That, however, is dead in the teeth of the judgment in the Broadway Car Co. case(4). The same argument was tried there, but Tucker L.J. said he thought the Desoutter case(3) had very little to do with it, as there was a great difference between land (1) 1942 1 A.E.R. 110. (3) 1946 1 \n E.R. 58. (2) 1947 1 A.E.R. 798 (4) 1946 2 \n E.R. 609. and a patent, and he did not think the Desoutter case(1) threw any light on the matter A patent is quite different from freehold land. These observations appositely apply to the case of a company incorporated for the purpose of doing business and earning profit by the process of manufacture.\nLetting out a part of its machinery in a certain situation in order to make the business advantageous as a whole does not alter the nature of the income.\nthe question whether a particular source of income was income or not must be decided, as it could be, according to ordinary commonsense principles.\nThe short question to decide in this case is whether on the facts found, it could be said reasonably that the dyeing plant had become redundant for its business as a silk manu- facturing concern, simply by the circumstance that for the time being it could not be used by it personally for the purpose of dyeing silk yarn owing to the non-availability of yarn. It is difficult to conceive that the company would not have immediately started dyeing yarn as soon as it became available.\nInstead of dyeing yarn, another person was allowed to dye jute (we are told), the assessee company making income out of its use as a commercial asset." + }, + "1951_64": { + "expert_1": "This is an assessees appeal from a judgment of the High Court at Calcutta delivered on a reference made to it under section 66(1 )of the Incometax Act. The question submitted for the High CourtS opinion was as follows-- Whether in the circumstances of this case, the interest paid by the assessee on debentures was incurred solely for the purpose of making or earning such income, profits or gains which are assessable under sub-section (1) of section 12. \nThe assessee is a private limited company which was incor- porated on 3rd January, 1927. It is an investment company known as the Eastern Investments Limited. The objects set out in the memorandum of association are to buy, sell and otherwise deal with shares, securities, bonds and so forth generally. The company was originally formed for acquiring, holding and otherwise dealing with shares and Government securities which had previously belonged to one Lord Cable. The share capital of the company at the date of its incorpo- ration was 250 lacs and consisted partly of preference shares and partly of ordinary shares. Of these Lord Cable held the majority including the 50,000 ordinary shares of the face value of Rs. 50,00,000 with which we are here concerned. \nThe rest of the share capital was held by the nominees of the late Lord Cable. Lord Cable died on the 28th of March, 1937, leaving an estate in Great Britain as well as in India. One Geoffrey Lacy Scott was appointed administrator of his estate in India and held these 50,000 shares in question in that capacity. According to the statement of the case drawn up by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal in its. reference to the High Court, money was needed by the executors of Lord Cable, and accordingly the administrator of the estate in India reached an agreement with the company on 9th February, 1937, the terms of which were as follows - The company agreed to reduce its share capital by Rs. 50 lacs and to do it by taking over from Scott the 50,000 shares mentioned above which stood in Lord Cables name at the rate of Rs. 100 a share. \nScott on his part agreed to forego cash payment and agreed instead to receive debentures of the face value of Rs. 50 lacs carrying interest at 5 per cent. per annum redeemable at the option of the registered holder at any time. The sanction of the Calcutta High Court was obtained in due course and the agreement was carried out by the parties. \nThe 5 per cent. interest paid to Scott on these deben- tures forms the subject-matter of the question before the Court. The company claims to deduct this from its income as part of its working expenses under section 12 (2) of the Income-tax Act, that is to say, to use the words of the section, as expenditure (not being in the nature of capital expend- iture) incurred solely for the purpose of making or earning such income, profits or gains. \nThis contention failed before the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal and also before the High Court.\nIt was agreed all through that the expenditure was not in the nature of capi- tal expenditure, but the view of the Income-tax Commissioner is that (a) it is not expenditure incurred for the purpose of earning the income, profits and gains of the company and (b) that even if it is, it is at any rate not expenditure incurred solely for that purpose. In general, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal and the High Court both took that view. The grounds on which these conclusions were based may be summarised as follows (1) the purpose of the agreement was to effect the conversion without in any way disturbing the holding of the investments of the company or interfering with the earning of its income (2) by this transaction the taxable income of the compa- ny was diminished \n There was complete identity of the person who -- (a) brought about this transaction without disturbing the affairs of the company, (b) to whom the share money was repaid. and (c) who took up the debentures and (4) that the transaction was more in the interest of the shareholder Scott than that of the company.\nThe decision of this appeal rests on the true construc- tion of section 12 (2).\nIn our Opinion, the law on this point has been correctly summarised in the judgment of the High Court.\nIn our opinion, the present case falls within these principles. (1) 1937 I.T.R. 270 P.C. (2) 1937 I.T.R. 202 P.C. (3) 6 Tax Cases 501. (4) 1915 A.C. 433. (5) 1926 A.C. 205 at 221 and 235. (6) 1912 A.C. 118. One of the points which weighed with the Incometax Appellate Tribunal and the High Court was that though the conversion did not in any way disturb the holding of the investments of the company or interfere with the earning of its income, it had the effect of diminishing its taxable income. In our judgment, this is not a proper consideration when the transaction is not challenged on the ground of fraud. In the present case there is not even an allegation of fraud.\nThe test for present purposes is not whether the other party benefitted, nor indeed whether this was a pru- dent transaction which resulted in ultimate gain to the appellant, but whether it was properly entered into as apart of the appellants legitimate commercial undertakings in order indirectly to facilitate the carrying on of its busi- ness.\nThe High Court doubted whether the transaction could be brought within the functions of an investment company and found it difficult to reconcile it with the objects set out in the Memorandum of Association. But we see no such diffi- culty.\nMoreover, we do not think that this inquiry is relevant, for we are dealing with a question of income-tax and not judging the legality or propriety of the transaction on an application to reduce the capital of the company. \n The only question is whether this was done in the ordinary course of business for the purposes we have already pointed out, however mistaken the directors and shareholders of the company may have been. Therefore, as stated by the Income-tax Appellate Tribu- nal in its statement of the case, the executors of Lord Cables estate needed money.\nIt seems evident therefore that Scott could have compelled the company to pay him cash for the shares. \n He seems to have had the whip hand. Instead of doing that he entered into an arrangement which, while giving him the necessary facili- ties, appears to have satisfied the company by allowing it to retain its investments without a precipitate liquidation of a large portion thereof.\nIt does not matter whether the company was right in this view or wrong, and in any event we are in no position to judge of the soundness of its decision because we have not all the materials before us. It has to be remembered that considerations of this kind go deeper than the apparent profit or loss on an isolated transaction standing by itself. \n It is not enough to say that the 50,000 shares which were cancelled earned in the following year only 31/2 per cent. interest as against 5 per cent. on the debentures because we do not know to what extent the hold- ings of the company would have been disturbed if this had not been done. What we do know is what the Income-tax Appel- late Tribunal has stated, namely, that-- the change brought about had been so designed that the investments of the company were not to be disturbed and as a consequence the income accrued was in no way to be affected. This has only to be stated to show the commercial nature of the transaction from the companys point of view.\nThe High Court considered that the capital of the compa- ny could have been reduced in other ways. But that again is not the point. There are usually many ways in which a given thing can be brought about in business circles but it is not for the Court to decide which of them should have been employed when the Court is deciding a question under section 12(2) of the Income-tax Act.\nThe company chose to do it this way, and as there was not even a sugges- tion of fraud, the only question is whether it was gone through as an ordinary commercial proposition. But we doubt if that is what paragraph 7 meant because in paragraph 4 of the application to the High Court dated 11th February, 1944, the petitioner stated that the money on hand and at short notice was only Rs. 8,94,379. That is a good deal short of 50 lacs.\nOn a full review of the facts it is clear that this transaction was voluntarily entered into in order indirectly to facilitate the carrying on of the business of the company and was made on the ground of commercial expediency. \n It therefore falls within the purview of section 12(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1922 before its amendment in 1939. This being an investment company, if it borrowed money and utilised the same for its investments on which it earned income, the interest paid by it on the loans will clearly be a permissible deduction under section 12(2) of the Income- tax Act. Whether the loan is taken on an overdraft, or is a fixed deposit or on a debenture makes no difference in law.\nThe only argument urged against allowing this deduction to be made is that the person who took the debentures was the party who sold the ordinary shares. \n It cannot be disputed that if the debentures were held by a third party, the interest payable on the same would be an allowable deduction in calculating the total income of the assessee company. What difference does it make if the holder of the debentures is a shareholder ?", + "expert_2": "money was needed by the executors of Lord Cable, and accordingly the administrator of the estate in India reached an agreement with the company on 9th February, 1937, the terms of which were as follows - The company agreed to reduce its share capital by Rs. 50 lacs and to do it by taking over from Scott the 50,000 shares mentioned above which stood in Lord Cables name at the rate of Rs. 100 a share. \nScott on his part agreed to forego cash payment and agreed instead to receive debentures of the face value of Rs. 50 lacs carrying interest at 5 per cent. per annum redeemable at the option of the registered holder at any time.\nThe 5 per cent. interest paid to Scott on these deben- tures forms the subject-matter of the question before the Court.\nThe company claims to deduct this from its income as part of its working expenses under section 12 (2) of the Income-tax Act, that is to say, to use the words of the section, as expenditure (not being in the nature of capital expend- iture) incurred solely for the purpose of making or earning such income, profits or gains.\nthe expenditure was not in the nature of capi- tal expenditure, but the view of the Income-tax Commissioner is that (a) it is not expenditure incurred for the purpose of earning the income, profits and gains of the company and (b) that even if it is, it is at any rate not expenditure incurred solely for that purpose.\nit is not necessary to show that the expenditure was a profitable one or that in fact any profit was earned Moore v. Stewart Lloyds(3) and Ushers case(4) (c) it is enough to show that the money was expended not of necessity and with a view to a direct and immediate benefit to the trade, but voluntarily and on the ground of commercial expediency. and in order indirectly to facilitate the carrying on of the business\nThe test for present purposes is not whether the other party benefitted, nor indeed whether this was a pru- dent transaction which resulted in ultimate gain to the appellant, but whether it was properly entered into as apart of the appellants legitimate commercial undertakings in order indirectly to facilitate the carrying on of its busi- ness.\nClause 5 empowers a reduction of capital of the company and clause 8(3) empowers the company to borrow or raise money by the issue of debentures.\nthe transac- tion was brought about at the instance of the holder of the majority of ordinary shares, and also that the shares were originally held by Lord Cable and his nominees. It seems evident therefore that Scott could have compelled the company to pay him cash for the shares. \n He seems to have had the whip hand. Instead of doing that he entered into an arrangement which, while giving him the necessary facili- ties, appears to have satisfied the company by allowing it to retain its investments without a precipitate liquidation of a large portion thereof. It does not matter whether the company was right in this view or wrong, and in any event we are in no position to judge of the soundness of its decision because we have not all the materials before us.\nThis has only to be stated to show the commercial nature of the transaction from the companys point of view.\nOn a full review of the facts it is clear that this transaction was voluntarily entered into in order indirectly to facilitate the carrying on of the business of the company and was made on the ground of commercial expediency. \n It therefore falls within the purview of section 12(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1922 before its amendment in 1939. This being an investment company, if it borrowed money and utilised the same for its investments on which it earned income, the interest paid by it on the loans will clearly be a permissible deduction under section 12(2) of the Income- tax Act. Whether the loan is taken on an overdraft, or is a fixed deposit or on a debenture makes no difference in law.", + "expert_3": "This is an assessees appeal from a judgment of the High Court at Calcutta delivered on a reference made to it under section 66(1 )of the Incometax Act. The question submitted for the High CourtS opinion was as follows-- Whether in the circumstances of this case, the interest paid by the assessee on debentures was incurred solely for the purpose of making or earning such income, profits or gains which are assessable under sub-section (1) of section 12\nThe assessee is a private limited company which was incor- porated on 3rd January, 1927.\nIt is an investment company known as the Eastern Investments Limited. The objects set out in the memorandum of association are to buy, sell and otherwise deal with shares, securities, bonds and so forth generally\nThe company was originally formed for acquiring, holding and otherwise dealing with shares and Government securities which had previously belonged to one Lord Cable.\nThe share capital of the company at the date of its incorpo- ration was 250 lacs and consisted partly of preference shares and partly of ordinary shares. Of these Lord Cable held the majority including the 50,000 ordinary shares of the face value of Rs. 50,00,000 with which we are here concerned\nThe rest of the share capital was held by the nominees of the late Lord Cable. Lord Cable died on the 28th of March, 1937, leaving an estate in Great Britain as well as in India. One Geoffrey Lacy Scott was appointed administrator of his estate in India and held these 50,000 shares in question in that capacity\nAccording to the statement of the case drawn up by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal in its. reference to the High Court, money was needed by the executors of Lord Cable, and accordingly the administrator of the estate in India reached an agreement with the company on 9th February, 1937, the terms of which were as follows - The company agreed to reduce its share capital by Rs. 50 lacs and to do it by taking over from Scott the 50,000 shares mentioned above which stood in Lord Cables name at the rate of Rs. 100 a share. \nScott on his part agreed to forego cash payment and agreed instead to receive debentures of the face value of Rs. 50 lacs carrying interest at 5 per cent. per annum redeemable at the option of the registered holder at any time\nThe sanction of the Calcutta High Court was obtained in due course and the agreement was carried out by the parties. \nThe 5 per cent. interest paid to Scott on these deben- tures forms the subject-matter of the question before the Court. The company claims to deduct this from its income as part of its working expenses under section 12 (2) of the Income-tax Act, that is to say, to use the words of the section, as expenditure (not being in the nature of capital expend- iture) incurred solely for the purpose of making or earning such income, profits or gains\nThis contention failed before the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal and also before the High Court. It was agreed all through that the expenditure was not in the nature of capi- tal expenditure, but the view of the Income-tax Commissioner is that (a) it is not expenditure incurred for the purpose of earning the income, profits and gains of the company and (b) that even if it is, it is at any rate not expenditure incurred solely for that purpose\nIn general, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal and the High Court both took that view. The grounds on which these conclusions were based may be summarised as follows (1) the purpose of the agreement was to effect the conversion without in any way disturbing the holding of the investments of the company or interfering with the earning of its income (2) by this transaction the taxable income of the compa- ny was diminished \n There was complete identity of the person who -- (a) brought about this transaction without disturbing the affairs of the company, (b) to whom the share money was repaid. and (c) who took up the debentures and (4) that the transaction was more in the interest of the shareholder Scott than that of the company.\nThe decision of this appeal rests on the true construc- tion of section 12 (2)\nThe following principles are relevant (a) though the question must be decided on the facts of each case, the final conclusion is one of law\n(b) it is not necessary to show that the expenditure was a profitable one or that in fact any profit was earned\n(c) it is enough to show that the money was expended not of necessity and with a view to a direct and immediate benefit to the trade, but voluntarily and on the ground of commercial expediency. and in order indirectly to facilitate the carrying on of the business\n(d) beyond that no hard and fast rule can be laid down to explain what is meant by the word solely\nA case somewhat similar to the present is Farmer v. Scottish North American Trust Ltd. (6) where it was held that interest paid on an overdraft required for purchasing shares (the shares purchased being retained as security for the overdraft) was an outgoing which could be deducted from the receipts to ascertain the taxable profits and gains Which were earned by them.\nIn our opinion, the present case falls within these principles.\nOne of the points which weighed with the Incometax Appellate Tribunal and the High Court was that though the conversion did not in any way disturb the holding of the investments of the company or interfere with the earning of its income, it had the effect of diminishing its taxable income. In our judgment, this is not a proper consideration when the transaction is not challenged on the ground of fraud.\nThe next point on which some stress was placed was that there was complete identity of person between the person whose shares were sold and the person who took the deben- tures and that the transaction resulted in considerable benefit to him. In the absence of a suggestion of fraud this is not relevant at all for giving effect to the provisions of section 12(2) of the Incometax Act\nMost commercial transactions are entered into for the mutual benefit of both sides, or at any rate each side hopes to gain something for itself\nThe test for present purposes is not whether the other party benefitted, nor indeed whether this was a pru- dent transaction which resulted in ultimate gain to the appellant, but whether it was properly entered into as apart of the appellants legitimate commercial undertakings in order indirectly to facilitate the carrying on of its busi- ness.\nThe High Court doubted whether the transaction could be brought within the functions of an investment company and found it difficult to reconcile it with the objects set out in the Memorandum of Association. But we see no such diffi- culty.\nClause 5 empowers a reduction of capital of the company and clause 8(3) empowers the company to borrow or raise money by the issue of debentures. The matter is clear- ly writ in the bond.\nwe do not think that this inquiry is relevant, for we are dealing with a question of income-tax and not judging the legality or propriety of the transaction on an application to reduce the capital of the company\nThe only question is whether this was done in the ordinary course of business for the purposes we have already pointed out, however mistaken the directors and shareholders of the company may have been.\nthe executors of Lord Cables estate needed money. In the next place, the transac- tion was brought about at the instance of the holder of the majority of ordinary shares, and also that the shares were originally held by Lord Cable and his nominees. It seems evident therefore that Scott could have compelled the company to pay him cash for the shares. \n He seems to have had the whip hand.\nInstead of doing that he entered into an arrangement which, while giving him the necessary facili- ties, appears to have satisfied the company by allowing it to retain its investments without a precipitate liquidation of a large portion thereof.\nIt does not matter whether the company was right in this view or wrong, and in any event we are in no position to judge of the soundness of its decision because we have not all the materials before us. It has to be remembered that considerations of this kind go deeper than the apparent profit or loss on an isolated transaction standing by itself.\nIt is not enough to say that the 50,000 shares which were cancelled earned in the following year only 31/2 per cent. interest as against 5 per cent. on the debentures because we do not know to what extent the hold- ings of the company would have been disturbed if this had not been done.\nWhat we do know is what the Income-tax Appel- late Tribunal has stated, namely, that-- the change brought about had been so designed that the investments of the company were not to be disturbed and as a consequence the income accrued was in no way to be affected. This has only to be stated to show the commercial nature of the transaction from the companys point of view\nThe High Court considered that the capital of the compa- ny could have been reduced in other ways. But that again is not the point.\nThere are usually many ways in which a given thing can be brought about in business circles but it is not for the Court to decide which of them should have been employed when the Court is deciding a question under section 12(2) of the Income-tax Act.\nThe company chose to do it this way, and as there was not even a sugges- tion of fraud, the only question is whether it was gone through as an ordinary commercial proposition. But we doubt if that is what paragraph 7 meant because in paragraph 4 of the application to the High Court dated 11th February, 1944, the petitioner stated that the money on hand and at short notice was only Rs. 8,94,379\nThat is a good deal short of 50 lacs\nOn a full review of the facts it is clear that this transaction was voluntarily entered into in order indirectly to facilitate the carrying on of the business of the company and was made on the ground of commercial expediency\nIt therefore falls within the purview of section 12(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1922 before its amendment in 1939. This being an investment company, if it borrowed money and utilised the same for its investments on which it earned income, the interest paid by it on the loans will clearly be a permissible deduction under section 12(2) of the Income- tax Act.\nWhether the loan is taken on an overdraft, or is a fixed deposit or on a debenture makes no difference in law\nThe only argument urged against allowing this deduction to be made is that the person who took the debentures was the party who sold the ordinary shares. \n It cannot be disputed that if the debentures were held by a third party, the interest payable on the same would be an allowable deduction in calculating the total income of the assessee company.\nWhat difference does it make if the holder of the debentures is a shareholder ?", + "expert_4": "This is an assessees appeal from a judgment of the High Court at Calcutta delivered on a reference made to it under section 66(1 )of the Incometax Act.\nThe question submitted for the High CourtS opinion was as follows-- Whether in the circumstances of this case, the interest paid by the assessee on debentures was incurred solely for the purpose of making or earning such income, profits or gains which are assessable under sub-section (1) of section 12.\nThe assessee is a private limited company which was incor- porated on 3rd January, 1927.\nIt is an investment company known as the Eastern Investments Limited.\nThe objects set out in the memorandum of association are to buy, sell and otherwise deal with shares, securities, bonds and so forth generally.\nThe company was originally formed for acquiring, holding and otherwise dealing with shares and Government securities which had previously belonged to one Lord Cable.\nThe share capital of the company at the date of its incorpo- ration was 250 lacs and consisted partly of preference shares and partly of ordinary shares.\nOf these Lord Cable held the majority including the 50,000 ordinary shares of the face value of Rs. 50,00,000 with which we are here concerned.\nThe rest of the share capital was held by the nominees of the late Lord Cable.\nLord Cable died on the 28th of March, 1937, leaving an estate in Great Britain as well as in India.\nOne Geoffrey Lacy Scott was appointed administrator of his estate in India and held these 50,000 shares in question in that capacity.\nAccording to the statement of the case drawn up by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal in its. reference to the High Court, money was needed by the executors of Lord Cable, and accordingly the administrator of the estate in India reached an agreement with the company on 9th February, 1937, the terms of which were as follows - The company agreed to reduce its share capital by Rs. 50 lacs and to do it by taking over from Scott the 50,000 shares mentioned above which stood in Lord Cables name at the rate of Rs. 100 a share.\nScott on his part agreed to forego cash payment and agreed instead to receive debentures of the face value of Rs. 50 lacs carrying interest at 5 per cent. per annum redeemable at the option of the registered holder at any time.\nThe sanction of the Calcutta High Court was obtained in due course and the agreement was carried out by the parties.\nThe 5 per cent. interest paid to Scott on these deben- tures forms the subject-matter of the question before the Court.\nThe company claims to deduct this from its income as part of its working expenses under section 12 (2) of the Income-tax Act, that is to say, to use the words of the section, as expenditure (not being in the nature of capital expend- iture) incurred solely for the purpose of making or earning such income, profits or gains.\nThis contention failed before the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal and also before the High Court.\nIt was agreed all through that the expenditure was not in the nature of capi- tal expenditure, but the view of the Income-tax Commissioner is that (a) it is not expenditure incurred for the purpose of earning the income, profits and gains of the company and (b) that even if it is, it is at any rate not expenditure incurred solely for that purpose.\nIn general, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal and the High Court both took that view.\nThe grounds on which these conclusions were based may be summarised as follows (1) the purpose of the agreement was to effect the conversion without in any way disturbing the holding of the investments of the company or interfering with the earning of its income (2) by this transaction the taxable income of the compa- ny was diminished \n There was complete identity of the person who -- (a) brought about this transaction without disturbing the affairs of the company, (b) to whom the share money was repaid. and (c) who took up the debentures and (4) that the transaction was more in the interest of the shareholder Scott than that of the company.\nThe decision of this appeal rests on the true construc- tion of section 12 (2).\nIn our Opinion, the law on this point has been correctly summarised in the judgment of the High Court.\nThe following principles are relevant (a) though the question must be decided on the facts of each case, the final conclusion is one of law\nIndian Radio Cable Communications Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Income- tax, Bombay(1) and Tara Hydro-Electric Agencies Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay(2)\n(b) it is not necessary to show that the expenditure was a profitable one or that in fact any profit was earned\nMoore v. Stewart Lloyds(3) and Ushers case(4)\n(c) it is enough to show that the money was expended not of necessity and with a view to a direct and immediate benefit to the trade, but voluntarily and on the ground of commercial expediency. and in order indirectly to facilitate the carrying on of the business\nand (d) beyond that no hard and fast rule can be laid down to explain what is meant by the word solely\nA case somewhat similar to the present is Farmer v. Scottish North American Trust Ltd. (6) where it was held that interest paid on an overdraft required for purchasing shares (the shares purchased being retained as security for the overdraft) was an outgoing which could be deducted from the receipts to ascertain the taxable profits and gains Which were earned by them.\nIn our opinion, the present case falls within these principles.\nOne of the points which weighed with the Incometax Appellate Tribunal and the High Court was that though the conversion did not in any way disturb the holding of the investments of the company or interfere with the earning of its income, it had the effect of diminishing its taxable income.\nIn our judgment, this is not a proper consideration when the transaction is not challenged on the ground of fraud.\nIn the present case there is not even an allegation of fraud.\nThe next point on which some stress was placed was that there was complete identity of person between the person whose shares were sold and the person who took the deben- tures and that the transaction resulted in considerable benefit to him. In the absence of a suggestion of fraud this is not relevant at all for giving effect to the provisions of section 12(2) of the Incometax Act.\nMost commercial transactions are entered into for the mutual benefit of both sides, or at any rate each side hopes to gain something for itself.\nThe test for present purposes is not whether the other party benefitted, nor indeed whether this was a pru- dent transaction which resulted in ultimate gain to the appellant, but whether it was properly entered into as apart of the appellants legitimate commercial undertakings in order indirectly to facilitate the carrying on of its busi- ness.\nThe High Court doubted whether the transaction could be brought within the functions of an investment company and found it difficult to reconcile it with the objects set out in the Memorandum of Association.\nBut we see no such diffi- culty.\nClause 5 empowers a reduction of capital of the company and clause 8(3) empowers the company to borrow or raise money by the issue of debentures.\nThe matter is clear- ly writ in the bond.\nMoreover, we do not think that this inquiry is relevant, for we are dealing with a question of income-tax and not judging the legality or propriety of the transaction on an application to reduce the capital of the company.\nThe only question is whether this was done in the ordinary course of business for the purposes we have already pointed out, however mistaken the directors and shareholders of the company may have been.\nTherefore, as stated by the Income-tax Appellate Tribu- nal in its statement of the case, the executors of Lord Cables estate needed money.\nIn the next place, the transac- tion was brought about at the instance of the holder of the majority of ordinary shares, and also that the shares were originally held by Lord Cable and his nominees.\nIt seems evident therefore that Scott could have compelled the company to pay him cash for the shares. \n He seems to have had the whip hand.\nInstead of doing that he entered into an arrangement which, while giving him the necessary facili- ties, appears to have satisfied the company by allowing it to retain its investments without a precipitate liquidation of a large portion thereof.\nIt does not matter whether the company was right in this view or wrong, and in any event we are in no position to judge of the soundness of its decision because we have not all the materials before us.\nIt has to be remembered that considerations of this kind go deeper than the apparent profit or loss on an isolated transaction standing by itself.\nIt is not enough to say that the 50,000 shares which were cancelled earned in the following year only 31/2 per cent. interest as against 5 per cent. on the debentures because we do not know to what extent the hold- ings of the company would have been disturbed if this had not been done.\nWhat we do know is what the Income-tax Appel- late Tribunal has stated, namely, that-- the change brought about had been so designed that the investments of the company were not to be disturbed and as a consequence the income accrued was in no way to be affected.\nThis has only to be stated to show the commercial nature of the transaction from the companys point of view.\nThe High Court considered that the capital of the compa- ny could have been reduced in other ways. But that again is not the point.\nThere are usually many ways in which a given thing can be brought about in business circles but it is not for the Court to decide which of them should have been employed when the Court is deciding a question under section 12(2) of the Income-tax Act.\nIt was argued on behalf of the respondent (basing the same on paragraph 7 of the appellants application to the High Court dated 5th April, 1947) that the company had at the time sufficient liquid resources to effect the reduction of capital desired and so it was not necessary to resort to this process.\nBut that again is not the point.\nThe company chose to do it this way, and as there was not even a sugges- tion of fraud, the only question is whether it was gone through as an ordinary commercial proposition.\nBut we doubt if that is what paragraph 7 meant because in paragraph 4 of the application to the High Court dated 11th February, 1944, the petitioner stated that the money on hand and at short notice was only Rs. 8,94,379.\nThat is a good deal short of 50 lacs. However, we need not enter into this in detail.\nOn a full review of the facts it is clear that this transaction was voluntarily entered into in order indirectly to facilitate the carrying on of the business of the company and was made on the ground of commercial expediency.\nIt therefore falls within the purview of section 12(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1922 before its amendment in 1939.\nThis being an investment company, if it borrowed money and utilised the same for its investments on which it earned income, the interest paid by it on the loans will clearly be a permissible deduction under section 12(2) of the Income- tax Act.\nWhether the loan is taken on an overdraft, or is a fixed deposit or on a debenture makes no difference in law.\nThe only argument urged against allowing this deduction to be made is that the person who took the debentures was the party who sold the ordinary shares\nIt cannot be disputed that if the debentures were held by a third party, the interest payable on the same would be an allowable deduction in calculating the total income of the assessee company.\nWhat difference does it make if the holder of the debentures is a shareholder ?", + "expert_5": "though the question must be decided on the facts of each case, the final conclusion is one of law Indian Radio Cable Communications Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Income- tax, Bombay(1) and Tara Hydro-Electric Agencies Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay\nit is not necessary to show that the expenditure was a profitable one or that in fact any profit was earned Moore v. Stewart Lloyds(3) and Ushers case(4)\nit is enough to show that the money was expended not of necessity and with a view to a direct and immediate benefit to the trade, but voluntarily and on the ground of commercial expediency. and in order indirectly to facilitate the carrying on of the business British Insulated Helsby Cables Ltd. v. Atherton\nbeyond that no hard and fast rule can be laid down to explain what is meant by the word solely\nA case somewhat similar to the present is Farmer v. Scottish North American Trust Ltd. (6) where it was held that interest paid on an overdraft required for purchasing shares (the shares purchased being retained as security for the overdraft) was an outgoing which could be deducted from the receipts to ascertain the taxable profits and gains Which were earned by them.\nIn our opinion, the present case falls within these principles.\nIn our judgment, this is not a proper consideration when the transaction is not challenged on the ground of fraud.\nIn the present case there is not even an allegation of fraud.\nIn the absence of a suggestion of fraud this is not relevant at all for giving effect to the provisions of section 12(2) of the Incometax Act.\nMost commercial transactions are entered into for the mutual benefit of both sides, or at any rate each side hopes to gain something for itself.\nThe test for present purposes is not whether the other party benefitted, nor indeed whether this was a pru- dent transaction which resulted in ultimate gain to the appellant, but whether it was properly entered into as apart of the appellants legitimate commercial undertakings in order indirectly to facilitate the carrying on of its busi- ness.\nClause 5 empowers a reduction of capital of the company and clause 8(3) empowers the company to borrow or raise money by the issue of debentures. The matter is clear- ly writ in the bond.\nthe executors of Lord Cables estate needed money. In the next place, the transac- tion was brought about at the instance of the holder of the majority of ordinary shares, and also that the shares were originally held by Lord Cable and his nominees.\nIt seems evident therefore that Scott could have compelled the company to pay him cash for the shares. \n He seems to have had the whip hand.\nInstead of doing that he entered into an arrangement which, while giving him the necessary facili- ties, appears to have satisfied the company by allowing it to retain its investments without a precipitate liquidation of a large portion thereof.\nIt does not matter whether the company was right in this view or wrong, and in any event we are in no position to judge of the soundness of its decision because we have not all the materials before us.\nIt has to be remembered that considerations of this kind go deeper than the apparent profit or loss on an isolated transaction standing by itself.\nthe Income-tax Appel- late Tribunal has stated, namely, that-- the change brought about had been so designed that the investments of the company were not to be disturbed and as a consequence the income accrued was in no way to be affected.\nThis has only to be stated to show the commercial nature of the transaction from the companys point of view.\nThere are usually many ways in which a given thing can be brought about in business circles but it is not for the Court to decide which of them should have been employed when the Court is deciding a question under section 12(2) of the Income-tax Act.\nOn a full review of the facts it is clear that this transaction was voluntarily entered into in order indirectly to facilitate the carrying on of the business of the company and was made on the ground of commercial expediency. \n It therefore falls within the purview of section 12(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1922 before its amendment in 1939.\nThis being an investment company, if it borrowed money and utilised the same for its investments on which it earned income, the interest paid by it on the loans will clearly be a permissible deduction under section 12(2) of the Income- tax Act.\nWhether the loan is taken on an overdraft, or is a fixed deposit or on a debenture makes no difference in law." + }, + "1951_80": { + "expert_1": "This is a petition under article 32 of the Constitution praying for the release of the peti- tioner from his alleged unlawful detention.\nWe accepted the petition and, at the conclusion of the hearing, ordered the petitioner to be released.\nThe petitioner challenged the validity of the order on various grounds but, while the petition was pending after this Court issued a rule nisi to the respondent, the petitioner was served on 6th August with another detention order dated 30th July,1951 1, purporting to be made by the Governor of Punjab under sub-section(1) of section 3 and section 4 of the Act as amended by the Preventive Detention (Amendment) Act, 1951, and he was served with fresh grounds of detention on 16th August, 1951. \nThereupon the petitioner filed a supplementary petition impugning the validity of the said order on the ground, inter alia, that it directed the detention of the petitioner up to 31st March, 1952, the date on which the Act itself was to expire and that this was contrary to the provisions of the Act as amended.\nOn behalf of the respondent, the Advocate-General of Punjab urged that the said order was not intended to be a fresh order of detention but was passed only with a view to limiting the period of detention till 31st March, 1952, as it had been held in some cases that an order of detention for an indefinite period was bad.\nIt will be seen that the terms of the order make it clear that it was intended to operate as a fresh order for the detention of the petitioner and this view is strengthened by the fact that the order was followed by the service of a fresh set of grounds on the petitioner as required by sec- tion 7 of the Act a proceeding which would be wholly unnec- essary if no fresh order of detention was intended.\nIndeed, it was suggested on behalf of the petitioner that the said order followed by service of fresh grounds only four days before the date fixed for the hearing of the petition by this Court was a deliberate move by the respondent to cir- cumvent the objections raised by the petitioner to the validity of the earlier order of 1st March, 1950, and thus render the proceeding infructuous.\nHowever that may be, we are clearly of opinion that the order dated 30th July, 1951. must be regarded as a fresh order made for the petitioners detention in superession of the earlier order and the ques- tion is whether it was illegal in that it straightaway directed that the petitioner be detained till 31st March, 1952, which was the date of the expiry of the Act. Whatever might be the position under the Act before its amendment in February, 1951, it is clear that the Act as amended requires that every.case of detention should be placed before an Advisory Board constituted under the Act (section 9) and provides that if the Board reports that there is sufficient cause for the detention the appropriate Government may confirm the detention order and continue the detention of the person concerned for such period as it thinks fit (section 11). \nIt is, therefore, plain that it is only after the Advisory Board, to which the case has been referred, reports that the detention is justified, the Government should determine what the period of deten- tion should be and not before. The fixing of the period of detention in the initial order itself in the present case was, therefore, contrary to the scheme of the Act and cannot be supported.\nThe learned Advocate-General, however, urged that in view of the provision in section 11 (2) that if the Advisory Board reports that there is no sufficient cause for the detention, the person concerned would be released forth- with, the direction in the order dated 30th July, 1951, that the petitioner should be detained till 31st March, 1952, could be ignored as mere surplusage.", + "expert_2": "The petitioner was arrested and detained under an order dated 1st March, 1950, made by the District Magistrate, Amritsar, under section3(1) of the Preventive Detention Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ) and the grounds of detention were communicated to the petitioner as required by section7 of the Act on 15th March, 1950. \nThe petitioner challenged the validity of the order on various grounds but, while the petition was pending after this Court issued a rule nisi to the respondent, the petitioner was served on 6th August with another detention order dated 30th July,1951 1, purporting to be made by the Governor of Punjab under sub-section(1) of section 3 and section 4 of the Act as amended by the Preventive Detention (Amendment) Act, 1951, and he was served with fresh grounds of detention on 16th August, 1951.\nIt will be seen that the terms of the order make it clear that it was intended to operate as a fresh order for the detention of the petitioner and this view is strengthened by the fact that the order was followed by the service of a fresh set of grounds on the petitioner as required by sec- tion 7 of the Act a proceeding which would be wholly unnec- essary if no fresh order of detention was intended.\nWhatever might be the position under the Act before its amendment in February, 1951, it is clear that the Act as amended requires that every.case of detention should be placed before an Advisory Board constituted under the Act (section 9) and provides that if the Board reports that there is sufficient cause for the detention the appropriate Government may confirm the detention order and continue the detention of the person concerned for such period as it thinks fit (section 11). \nIt is, therefore, plain that it is only after the Advisory Board, to which the case has been referred, reports that the detention is justified, the Government should determine what the period of deten- tion should be and not before. The fixing of the period of detention in the initial order itself in the present case was, therefore, contrary to the scheme of the Act and cannot be supported.", + "expert_3": "This is a petition under article 32 of the Constitution praying for the release of the peti- tioner from his alleged unlawful detention\nWe accepted the petition and, at the conclusion of the hearing, ordered the petitioner to be released.\nThe petitioner was arrested and detained under an order dated 1st March, 1950, made by the District Magistrate, Amritsar, under section3(1) of the Preventive Detention Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ) and the grounds of detention were communicated to the petitioner as required by section7 of the Act on 15th March, 1950. \nThe petitioner challenged the validity of the order on various grounds but, while the petition was pending after this Court issued a rule nisi to the respondent, the petitioner was served on 6th August with another detention order dated 30th July,1951 1, purporting to be made by the Governor of Punjab under sub-section(1) of section 3 and section 4 of the Act as amended by the Preventive Detention (Amendment) Act, 1951, and he was served with fresh grounds of detention on 16th August, 1951\nThereupon the petitioner filed a supplementary petition impugning the validity of the said order on the ground, inter alia, that it directed the detention of the petitioner up to 31st March, 1952, the date on which the Act itself was to expire and that this was contrary to the provisions of the Act as amended\nThe order runs as follows - WHEREAS the Governor of Punjab is satisfied with respect to the person known as Makhan Singh Tarsikka, son of Gujjar Singh, Jat, of Tarsikka, Police Station Jandiala, Amritsar District, that with a view to preventing him from acting in a manner prejudicial to the security of the State, it is necessary to make the following order Now, THEREFORE, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 and section 4 of the Preventive Detention Act, 1950 (Act IV of 1950), as amended by the Preventive Detention (Amendment) Act, 1951 (Act IV of 1951), the Governor of Punjab hereby directs that the said Makhan Singh Tarsikka be committed to the custody of the InspectorGeneral of Prisons, Punjab, and detained in any jail of the State till 31st March, 1952, subject to such conditions as to mainte- nance, discipline and punishment for breaches of discipline as have been specified by a general order or as contained in the Punjab Communist Detenu Rules, 1950.\nIt will be seen that the terms of the order make it clear that it was intended to operate as a fresh order for the detention of the petitioner and this view is strengthened by the fact that the order was followed by the service of a fresh set of grounds on the petitioner as required by sec- tion 7 of the Act a proceeding which would be wholly unnec- essary if no fresh order of detention was intended. Indeed, it was suggested on behalf of the petitioner that the said order followed by service of fresh grounds only four days before the date fixed for the hearing of the petition by this Court was a deliberate move by the respondent to cir- cumvent the objections raised by the petitioner to the validity of the earlier order of 1st March, 1950, and thus render the proceeding infructuous.\nHowever that may be, we are clearly of opinion that the order dated 30th July, 1951. must be regarded as a fresh order made for the petitioners detention in superession of the earlier order and the ques- tion is whether it was illegal in that it straightaway directed that the petitioner be detained till 31st March, 1952, which was the date of the expiry of the Act\nWhatever might be the position under the Act before its amendment in February, 1951, it is clear that the Act as amended requires that every.case of detention should be placed before an Advisory Board constituted under the Act (section 9) and provides that if the Board reports that there is sufficient cause for the detention the appropriate Government may confirm the detention order and continue the detention of the person concerned for such period as it thinks fit (section 11). \nIt is, therefore, plain that it is only after the Advisory Board, to which the case has been referred, reports that the detention is justified, the Government should determine what the period of deten- tion should be and not before\nThe fixing of the period of detention in the initial order itself in the present case was, therefore, contrary to the scheme of the Act and cannot be supported", + "expert_4": "Application under article 32 of the Constitution for a writ in the nature of habeas corpus praying for the release of the petitioner from detention.\nThis is a petition under article 32 of the Constitution praying for the release of the peti- tioner from his alleged unlawful detention.\nWe accepted the petition and, at the conclusion of the hearing, ordered the petitioner to be released., We now proceed to give the reasons for our order.\nThe petitioner was arrested and detained under an order dated 1st March, 1950, made by the District Magistrate, Amritsar, under section3(1) of the Preventive Detention Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ) and the grounds of detention were communicated to the petitioner as required by section7 of the Act on 15th March, 1950.\nThe petitioner challenged the validity of the order on various grounds but, while the petition was pending after this Court issued a rule nisi to the respondent, the petitioner was served on 6th August with another detention order dated 30th July,1951 1, purporting to be made by the Governor of Punjab under sub-section(1) of section 3 and section 4 of the Act as amended by the Preventive Detention (Amendment) Act, 1951, and he was served with fresh grounds of detention on 16th August, 1951.\nThereupon the petitioner filed a supplementary petition impugning the validity of the said order on the ground, inter alia, that it directed the detention of the petitioner up to 31st March, 1952, the date on which the Act itself was to expire and that this was contrary to the provisions of the Act as amended.\nOn behalf of the respondent, the Advocate-General of Punjab urged that the said order was not intended to be a fresh order of detention but was passed only with a view to limiting the period of detention till 31st March, 1952, as it had been held in some cases that an order of detention for an indefinite period was bad.\nThe order runs as follows - WHEREAS the Governor of Punjab is satisfied with respect to the person known as Makhan Singh Tarsikka, son of Gujjar Singh, Jat, of Tarsikka, Police Station Jandiala, Amritsar District, that with a view to preventing him from acting in a manner prejudicial to the security of the State, it is necessary to make the following order Now, THEREFORE, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 and section 4 of the Preventive Detention Act, 1950 (Act IV of 1950), as amended by the Preventive Detention (Amendment) Act, 1951 (Act IV of 1951), the Governor of Punjab hereby directs that the said Makhan Singh Tarsikka be committed to the custody of the InspectorGeneral of Prisons, Punjab, and detained in any jail of the State till 31st March, 1952, subject to such conditions as to mainte- nance, discipline and punishment for breaches of discipline as have been specified by a general order or as contained in the Punjab Communist Detenu Rules, 1950.\nIt will be seen that the terms of the order make it clear that it was intended to operate as a fresh order for the detention of the petitioner and this view is strengthened by the fact that the order was followed by the service of a fresh set of grounds on the petitioner as required by sec- tion 7 of the Act a proceeding which would be wholly unnec- essary if no fresh order of detention was intended.\nIndeed, it was suggested on behalf of the petitioner that the said order followed by service of fresh grounds only four days before the date fixed for the hearing of the petition by this Court was a deliberate move by the respondent to cir- cumvent the objections raised by the petitioner to the validity of the earlier order of 1st March, 1950, and thus render the proceeding infructuous.\nHowever that may be, we are clearly of opinion that the order dated 30th July, 1951. must be regarded as a fresh order made for the petitioners detention in superession of the earlier order and the ques- tion is whether it was illegal in that it straightaway directed that the petitioner be detained till 31st March, 1952, which was the date of the expiry of the Act.\nWhatever might be the position under the Act before its amendment in February, 1951, it is clear that the Act as amended requires that every.case of detention should be placed before an Advisory Board constituted under the Act (section 9) and provides that if the Board reports that there is sufficient cause for the detention the appropriate Government may confirm the detention order and continue the detention of the person concerned for such period as it thinks fit (section 11).\nIt is, therefore, plain that it is only after the Advisory Board, to which the case has been referred, reports that the detention is justified, the Government should determine what the period of deten- tion should be and not before.\nThe fixing of the period of detention in the initial order itself in the present case was, therefore, contrary to the scheme of the Act and cannot be supported.\nThe learned Advocate-General, however, urged that in view of the provision in section 11 (2) that if the Advisory Board reports that there is no sufficient cause for the detention, the person concerned would be released forth- with, the direction in the order dated 30th July, 1951, that the petitioner should be detained till 31st March, 1952, could be ignored as mere surplusage.", + "expert_5": "We accepted the petition and, at the conclusion of the hearing, ordered the petitioner to be released.\nwhile the petition was pending after this Court issued a rule nisi to the respondent, the petitioner was served on 6th August with another detention order dated 30th July,1951\nit directed the detention of the petitioner up to 31st March, 1952, the date on which the Act itself was to expire\nthe order dated 30th July, 1951. must be regarded as a fresh order made for the petitioners detention in superession of the earlier order\nit straightaway directed that the petitioner be detained till 31st March, 1952, which was the date of the expiry of the Act.\nthe Act as amended requires that every.case of detention should be placed before an Advisory Board constituted under the Act (section 9) and provides that if the Board reports that there is sufficient cause for the detention the appropriate Government may confirm the detention order and continue the detention of the person concerned for such period as it thinks fit (section 11).\nThe fixing of the period of detention in the initial order itself in the present case was, therefore, contrary to the scheme of the Act and cannot be supported.\nThe learned Advocate-General, however, urged that in view of the provision in section 11 (2) that if the Advisory Board reports that there is no sufficient cause for the detention, the person concerned would be released forth- with, the direction in the order dated 30th July, 1951, that the petitioner should be detained till 31st March, 1952, could be ignored as mere surplusage." + }, + "1952_42": { + "expert_1": "This is a petition under article 32 of the Constitution of India by Shri Visheswar Rao, zamindar and proprietor of Ahiri zamindari, an estate as defined in section 2 (3) of the Central Provinces Land Revenue Act, II of 1917, and situated in tehsil Sironcha, district Chanda (Madhya Pradesh), for the enforcement of his fundamental right to property under article 31(1) of the Constitution by the issue of an appropriate writ or a direction to the respondent State restraining it from disturbing his possession of the estate, and eighty malguzari villages situate in the Garchiroli tehsil of the same district.\nAgainst the constitutionality of this Act a number of petitioners were made in the High Court of Nagpur but they were all dismissed by that court on the 9th April, while this petition along with some others was pending in this Court.\nThe Petitioners case is that under the formula stated in the Act, a compensation of 25 lakhs which would be due to him on he basis of the value of property taken, has been reduced to a sum of Rs. 65,000 and is payable in thirty unspecified instalments and therefore it is purely nominal and illusory.\nAs already pointed out, the proceedings were signed by the Speaker on the 1st October, 1950, while the certificate that the Bill was passed was recorded by him on the original Bill when it was submitted to the President for his assent on the 10th May, 1950. \n The certificate of the Speaker is conclusive on the point that the Bill was passed by the legislature (Vide Craies Statute Law, 4th Edn., p. 36).\nIt seems to me that by an oversight it was not recorded in the proceedings that the mission was put to and passed by the House and the Speaker while signing the proceedings six months after the event failed to notice the error. There can be no about that the sense of the House on the 5th April, 1950, was for passing the Bill and there was no one present who was for rejecting it.\nIn my opinion the contention raised that the Bill was not passed into law fails and must be rejected.\nThis argument, in my opinion, has not much force having regard to the terms and scope of article 200. The Governor under that article could assent to a Bill or could reserve it for the consideration of the President at his option. The Governor being empowered to reserve the Bill for the consideration of the President and this having been done, it was for the President either to assent to the Bill or to withhold his assent. The President having given his assent, the Bill must be held to have been passed into law.\nIt does not seem to have been intended that the Governor should give his assent to the Bill and make it a full-fledged law and then reserve it for the Presidents consideration so that it may have effect.\nIn my opinion, the argument is fallacious. It would be a meaningless formality for the President to give his assent to the same Bill twice over.\nI cannot see why the President cannot perform both the duties entrusted to him by articles 200 and 31(3) and (4) at one the same time. He is not disabled under the Constitution from applying his mind to such a Bill once and for all to see whether it has to be passed into law and whether it fulfils the requirements of article 31(2). The Presidents assent therefore to the Bill attracts the application of articles 31-A and 31-B to it and deprives persons affected by it of the rights guaranteed in Part III of the Constitution. The Provisions of article 31(4) support the view of the learned Attorney-General that what has to be sent to the President is the Bill as passed by the legislature and not the Bill after it has been assented to by the Governor.\nIn this context the word Legislature means the House or Houses of Legislature and does not include the Governor with in its ambit. This word has not the same meaning in all the articles. In some articles it means the Governor as well as the Houses of Legislature, while in a number of other articles it only means the House or Houses of Legislature.\nThis contention fails for the reasons given in my judgment in the Bihar case. Moreover, the compensation provided for in the impugned Act cannot be dubbed as illusory. All that can be said is that it is grossly inadequate and it is not the equivalent of the value of the property acquired, but this issue is not justiciable in view of the provisions of article 31(4).\nThe contention that there is no public purpose behind the impugned Act has also to be repelled on the same reasoning as given by me in the Bihar case. The purpose behind the Act is to establish direct contact between tillers of the soil and the Government and to eliminate the intermediaries, as in the view of the Government this is for the welfare of the society as a whole. It is also the purpose of the Act to confer malik maqbuza status on occupancy tenants and improve their present position and to vest management of village affairs and cultivation in a democratic village body. It is too late in the day to contend that reform in this directions is not for general public benefit.\nThe next argument of Mr. Somayya that the Act is a fraud on the Constitution in that in legislating under entry 42 of List III, it has legislated for non-payment of compensation has also to be repelled, for the reasons given in the Bihar case. Under the provisions of this Act compensation can in no case work out into a mere nothing. On the other hand, in every case some amount of compensation is payable and in the majority of cases it is also not inadequate, Mr. Somayya contended that payment of Rs. 65,000 as compensation to his client for property worth twenty-five lakhs of rupees was purely illusory. \n The assessment of value by the petitioner cannot be taken at its full value. It cannot at any rate be held that legislation which provides for the payment of a sum of Rs. 65,000 provides for no compensation. The amount of instalments, if payment is to be in instalments, is bound to be fixed by the rules made under the statute and in case the rules are so made that they amount to an abuse of the exercise of that power, they can always be challenged on that ground. The argument that the Act is bad inasmuch as it delegates essential legislative power to the executive is negatived for the reasons given in the Bihar case.\nThere is nothing on the record to support this contention. The contention that those eighty mahals are not an estateand are thus excluded from the reach of article 31-A does not, however very much advances the petitioners case, because the hurdles created in his way by articles 31-B and 31(4) stand in spite of the circumstances that article 31-A has no application\nIn my opinion, the observations in Sibnath Banerjees case ((1945) L.R. 72 I.A. 241 1945 F.C.R. 195), far from supporting the contention raised, negatives it.\nThe dictum of Holmes C.J. has no application to the construction of a Constitution which has in express terms made the payment of compensation obligatory for compulsory acquisition of property, which again in express terms by an amendment of it, has deprived persons affected by the impugned Act of this right.\nIn my opinion this argument is void of force. It was within the competence of the Government in exercise of its governmental power to enhanced land revenue, to withdraw exemption of land revenue, wherever those had been granted, and to enact other laws of a similar character. There is no evidence whatsoever that all these enactments were enacted with a fraudulent design of defeating the provisions of payment of compensation contained in the Constitution. The Constitution had not even come into force by the time that most of these statutes were enacted. The petition is therefore dismissed. I however, making no order as to costs.\nArticle 363 takes away the jurisdiction of the courts regarding disputes arising out of treaties agreements, covenants, engagements, sanads etc.\nIt is true that by the covenant of merger the properties of the petitioner became his private properties as distinguished from properties of the State but in respect of them he is no better position than any other owner possessing private property. Article 362 does not prohibit the acquisition of properties declared as private properties by the covenant of merger and does not guarantee their perpetual existence.\nThe guarantee contained in the articles is of a limited extent only. It assures that the Rules properties declared as their private properties will not be claimed as State properties. \n The guarantee has no greater scope than this. That guarantee has been fully respected by the impugned statue as it treats treats those properties is their private properties and seeks to acquire them on that assumption. Moreover it seems to me that in view of the comprehensive language of article 363 this issue is not justiciable.\nThis petition is accordingly dismissed but there will be no order of costs.\nIn my opinion, the argument is based on a fallacy. As already stated, the purpose of the Act is to bring about reforms in the land tenure system of the State by establishing direct contact between the tillers of the soil and the Government.\nThese petitions are accordingly dismissed. I make no order of costs in them.\nFor the reasons given therein this petition is also dismissed, but I make no order as to costs in it.\nThis petition also fails and is dismissed. There will be no order as to costs.\nI agree with my Lord the Chief Justice that these petitions should be dismissed.", + "expert_2": "This is a petition under article 32 of the Constitution of India by Shri Visheswar Rao, zamindar and proprietor of Ahiri zamindari, an estate as defined in section 2 (3) of the Central Provinces Land Revenue Act, II of 1917, and situated in tehsil Sironcha, district Chanda (Madhya Pradesh), for the enforcement of his fundamental right to property under article 31(1) of the Constitution by the issue of an appropriate writ or a direction to the respondent State restraining it from disturbing his possession of the estate, and eighty malguzari villages situate in the Garchiroli tehsil of the same district.\nIt was alleged that the Madhya Pradesh Act, I of 1951 was unconstitutional and void and infringed the fundamental rights of the petitioner in a variety of ways.\nThe preamble of the Act is in these terms - An Act to provide for the acquisition of the rights of proprietors in estates, mahals, alienated villages and alienated lands in Madhya Pradesh and to make provision for other matters connected there with. The legislation clearly falls within entry 36 of List II of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution. The Madhya Pradesh Legislature had therefore undoubted competence to enact it.\nThe main purpose of the Act is to bring the actual tillers of the soil in direct contract with the State by the elimination of intermediary holders. In short, the Act aims at converting malguzari into ryotwari land system.\nThere can therefore be no doubt that the principles laid down for determination of compensation cannot be called equitable and they do not provided for payment of just compensation to the expropriated proprietor. The Petitioners case is that under the formula stated in the Act, a compensation of 25 lakhs which would be due to him on he basis of the value of property taken, has been reduced to a sum of Rs. 65,000 and is payable in thirty unspecified instalments and therefore it is purely nominal and illusory.\nThe first and the main objection to the validity of the Act taken by the learned counsel is that the Bill was never passed into law. As already indicated, this objection is founded on the omission from the proceedings of the Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly dated the 5th April, 1950, of a statement to the effect that the Bill was put to the House by the speaker and was passed by it.\nIt was urged that the authentic report of the proceedings of the Assembly was conclusive on the point, that the Bill was not put to the Assembly by means of a question and was not voted upon, and hence it could not be said to have been passed by the legislature. It was said that even if there was no open opposition to the passing of the Bill, it was possible that if it was put to the Assembly, it might have rejected it.\nAs already pointed out, the proceedings were signed by the Speaker on the 1st October, 1950, while the certificate that the Bill was passed was recorded by him on the original Bill when it was submitted to the President for his assent on the 10th May, 1950. \n The certificate of the Speaker is conclusive on the point that the Bill was passed by the legislature (Vide Craies Statute Law, 4th Edn., p. 36). It seems to me that by an oversight it was not recorded in the proceedings that the mission was put to and passed by the House and the Speaker while signing the proceedings six months after the event failed to notice the error.\nThe Speaker could not possibly have appended a certificate on a Bill that it was passed by the House if it had not been so passed. There are no grounds whatever for doubting the correctness of his certificate. In my opinion the contention raised that the Bill was not passed into law fails and must be rejected.\nIt was said that even if the Bill was passed by the Legislative Assembly, it was not assented to by the Governor but was straightway sent to the President and that without the assent of the Governor the Bill could not become law despite the fact that it was assented to by the President and it was pointed out that sub-clause (3) of article 31 of the Constitution speaks of law being reserved for the consideration of President and not merely a Bill.\nThe Governor under that article could assent to a Bill or could reserve it for the consideration of the President at his option. The Governor being empowered to reserve the Bill for the consideration of the President and this having been done, it was for the President either to assent to the Bill or to withhold his assent. The President having given his assent, the Bill must be held to have been passed into law. It does not seem to have been intended that the Governor should give his assent to the Bill and make it a full-fledged law and then reserve it for the Presidents consideration so that it may have effect.\nThe Provisions of article 31(4) support the view of the learned Attorney-General that what has to be sent to the President is the Bill as passed by the legislature and not the Bill after it has been assented to by the Governor.\nArticle 31(4) means that if any Bill contravening the provisions of clause (2) of article 31 is passed by the House or Houses of Legislature but is reserved for he consideration of the President and receives his assent, then it shall become law, not open to any objection on the ground of such contravention.\nNext it was contended that the obligation to pay compensation was implicit in the legislative power contained in entry 36 of List II and that the Act was unconstitutional as it had provided for acquisition of zamindaris without payment of compensation, the provisions relating to it being illusory.\nAll that can be said is that it is grossly inadequate and it is not the equivalent of the value of the property acquired, but this issue is not justiciable in view of the provisions of article 31(4). This Bill was pending at the commencement of the Constitution, it was reserved for the consideration of the president and the President gave his assent to it. The conditions for the application of article 31(4) thus stand fulfilled.\nBesides the obstacle of article 31(4). two further hurdles, viz., of articles 31-A and 31-B introduced by the amendments to the Constitution, stand in the way of the petitioner and bar an enquiry into the question of the quantum of compensation.\nthe Act is a fraud on the Constitution in that in legislating under entry 42 of List III, it has legislated for non-payment of compensation has also to be repelled, for the reasons given in the Bihar case. Under the provisions of this Act compensation can in no case work out into a mere nothing.\nThe amount of instalments, if payment is to be in instalments, is bound to be fixed by the rules made under the statute and in case the rules are so made that they amount to an abuse of the exercise of that power, they can always be challenged on that ground. The argument that the Act is bad inasmuch as it delegates essential legislative power to the executive is negatived for the reasons given in the Bihar case.\nThe contention that those eighty mahals are not an estateand are thus excluded from the reach of article 31-A does not, however very much advances the petitioners case, because the hurdles created in his way by articles 31-B and 31(4) stand in spite of the circumstances that article 31-A has no application. It was contended that article 31-B was merely illustrative of the rule stated in article 31-A and if article 31-A had no application, that article also should be left out of consideration.\nArticle 31-B specifically validates certain Acts mentioned in the schedule despite the provisions of article 31-A and is not illustrative of article 31A but stands independent of it. The impugned Act in this situation qua the acquisition on the eighty malguzari villages cannot be questioned on the ground that it contravenes the provisions of article 31(2) of the Constitution or any of the other provisions of Part III. The applicability of article 31(4) is not limited to estates and its provisions save the law in its entirety.\nThe dictum of Holmes C.J. has no application to the construction of a Constitution which has in express terms made the payment of compensation obligatory for compulsory acquisition of property, which again in express terms by an amendment of it, has deprived persons affected by the impugned Act of this right.\nIt was within the competence of the Government in exercise of its governmental power to enhanced land revenue, to withdraw exemption of land revenue, wherever those had been granted, and to enact other laws of a similar character. There is no evidence whatsoever that all these enactments were enacted with a fraudulent design of defeating the provisions of payment of compensation contained in the Constitution. The Constitution had not even come into force by the time that most of these statutes were enacted.\nIt is true that by the covenant of merger the properties of the petitioner became his private properties as distinguished from properties of the State but in respect of them he is no better position than any other owner possessing private property. Article 362 does not prohibit the acquisition of properties declared as private properties by the covenant of merger and does not guarantee their perpetual existence. The guarantee contained in the articles is of a limited extent only.\nThat guarantee has been fully respected by the impugned statue as it treats treats those properties is their private properties and seeks to acquire them on that assumption\nSwami Vehemently argued that the Government has by this Act become a super- zamindar, that there is no public purpose behind the Act, that there is no change in the existing order of things, that the Act has achieved nothing new, the tenants remain as they were, the malikan cabza were also already in existence, that acquisition of that status by occupancy tenants was possible under existing statutes and that they had also the power of transfer of their holdings. In my opinion, the argument is based on a fallacy. As already stated, the purpose of the Act is to bring about reforms in the land tenure system of the State by establishing direct contact between the tillers of the soil and the Government.\nIt is true that section 9 of the Acts does not specially indicate when the instalments will began or what the amount of each instalments will be but the Section clearly contemplates that these details should be worked out by rules to be framed under section 91 of the Act. Further under section 10 the State Government is bound to direct payment of an interim compensation amounting to one-tenth of the estimated amount of compensation if the whole amount is not paid within a period of six months from the date of vesting of the property in the State. I see no improper delegation of legislative power at all.", + "expert_3": "This is a petition under article 32 of the Constitution of India by Shri Visheswar Rao, zamindar and proprietor of Ahiri zamindari, an estate as defined in section 2 (3) of the Central Provinces Land Revenue Act, II of 1917, and situated in tehsil Sironcha, district Chanda (Madhya Pradesh), for the enforcement of his fundamental right to property under article 31(1) of the Constitution by the issue of an appropriate writ or a direction to the respondent State restraining it from disturbing his possession of the estate, and eighty malguzari villages situate in the Garchiroli tehsil of the same district.\nThe petitioner and his ancestors have been owing and enjoying these properties in full proprietary right for several generations past. \nOn the 5th April, 1950, the Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly enacted an Act called the Madhya Pradesh Abolition of Proprietary Right Act. The Act received the assent of the President of India on the 22nd January, 1951, and was published in the Madhya Pradesh Gazette on the 26th January, 1951, as Act I of 1951.\nBy a notification in a gazette extraordinary issued on the 27th January, 1951, the Madhya Pradesh Government fixed 31st March 1951, as the date of vesting of the estates under section 3 of the Act. The petitioner thus was to lose his estate and lands on the 31st March 1951\nOn the 9th March, 1951, i.e. before the vesting date, he presented the present application to this court for the issue of appropriate writs against the government prohibiting it from taking possession of his properties. It was alleged that the Madhya Pradesh Act, I of 1951 was unconstitutional and void and infringed the fundamental rights of the petitioner in a variety of ways\nMadhya Pradesh is a composite State, comprising the Central Provisions, Berar and the merged territories. By an agreement of merger made between the rules of States and the Dominion of in India dated the 15th December 1947, certain territories which at one time were under the Indian States Agency and were held by these rulers were integrated with the Dominion\nThe intergration actually took place on the 1st January, 1948. \nOn the 1st August, 1949, the States were merged in the Madhya Pradesh. There were in all 106 estates in Madhya Pradesh as defined in section 2 (3) of Act I of 1951 and held by zamindars.\nMost of the lands are owned by malguzars of mahals in the status of Malkan cabza. The land system prevailing in Madhya Pradesh is malguzari (except in certain areas where the ryotwari system is in vogue), the malguzar being an intermediary between the State and the tiller. Land is also held on a variety of subordinate tenures by absolute occupancy tenants, occupancy tenants, ryots, thikedars, mafidars ilaqadars etc. Land revenue in Madhya Pradesh was last assessed under the Central Provinces Land Revenue Act, II of 1917. The estate holders pay land revenue on the lands comprised in the estates at a concession rate.\nThe payment is technically called tekoli In 1939 there was an ad hoc increase in the amount of tekoli by the Central Provinces Revision of Land Revenue Estates Act, I of 1939.\nOn the 3rd September 1946 the Central Provinces and Bear Legislative Assembly passed a resolution for the elimination of intermediaries between the State and the peasant. Soon after passing of this resolution several laws were enacted, it is said with a view to achieve this result, the impugned Act being the last of the series. In 1947, the Central Provinces Land Revenue Estates Act, XXV of 1947, was enacted. The revenue assessment, viz., tekoli, on the estates was, we are told enhanced, in some places from thirty to fifty per cent, of the full jama and in others from forty to sixty per cent.\nIn the same year was enacted the Central Provinces Land Revenue Revision Mahals Act, XXVI of 1947. The land assessment on malguzari villages was it is alleged, raised to 75 per cent. from 45 to 50 per cent. of malguzari assets. This was done without recourse to a settlement. In 1948 came the Central Provinces and Berar Revocation of Exemptions Act, XXXVII of 1948, making persons exempted from payment of land revenue liable for it. This legislation, it is urged, resulted in the reduction of the net income of the proprietors to a large extent.\nSome members expressed the opinion that the provisions of the Act did not go far enough, others thought that the provisions as to compensation should have been more liberal, but there was none who was for rejecting the Bill as it stood. The report of the proceedings of the 5th April, 1950, does not contain the note that the motion that the Bill be passed into law was carried.\n The omission of this note in the proceedings of the proceedings of the legislature has furnished a basis for the argument that the Bill was never passed into law\nThe original Bill that was submitted to the President for his assent was printed on the 29th April, 1950, and it bears on it the certificate of the Speaker dated the 10th May, 1950, stating that the Bill was duly passed by the legislature on the 5th April, 1950. This certificate was signed by the Speaker a considerable time ahead of his signing the proceedings. The Act, as already stated, received the assent of the President on the 22nd January, 1951, and was published in the Madhya Pradesh Gazette on the 26th January, 1951, as Madhya Pradesh Act I of 1951\nAgainst the constitutionality of this Act a number of petitioners were made in the High Court of Nagpur but they were all dismissed by that court on the 9th April, while this petition along with some others was pending in this Court\nThe preamble of the Act is in these terms - An Act to provide for the acquisition of the rights of proprietors in estates, mahals, alienated villages and alienated lands in Madhya Pradesh and to make provision for other matters connected there with. The legislation clearly falls within entry 36 of List II of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution. The Madhya Pradesh Legislature had therefore undoubted competence to enact it.\nUnder the provisions of section 218 of the Central Provinces Land Revenue Act and Section 44 of the Berar Land Revenue Code there is a presumption that all mines and minerals belong to the State and the proprietary rights in them could be granted by the State to any person. Wherever a right of minerals has been so assigned, provision has been made regarding its acquisition and the consequences as resulting from such acquisition. The Act provides for the giving of rehabilitation grant to expropriated proprietors within a certain range provided for in Schedule III. The last chapter in the Act deals with miscellaneous matters including the power of making rules. The main purpose of the Act is to bring the actual tillers of the soil in direct contract with the State by the elimination of intermediary holders. In short, the Act aims at converting malguzari into ryotwari land system.\nIn also aims at giving to the gram panchayats the management of common lands freed from the grip of proprietors and contemplates the establishment of self-government for the villages. The provisions of the Act in respect of payment of compensation, though they do not in any way provide for an equivalent in money of the property taken and in that sense may not be adequate cannot be called illusory. \n This Act is a definite improvement on the Bihar Act it leaves the arrears of rents due in the hands of the proprietors and does not operate artificially to reduce the net income by any device. It also provides that in no case the net income should be reduced below five per cent of the gross income\nThe result is that in every case some amount of money becomes payable by the State by way of compensation to the proprietor and in no case does the compensation work into a negative sum or to a mere zero or a minus figure\nIn other respects the provisions of the Act in regard to compensation follow the pattern which is common to all zamindari legislation, which is to inflate the amount of expenditure and deflate the actual income.\nThe siwai income from jalkar, bankar, etc. and from village forests is calculated at two times the siwai income recorded in the settlement made in 1923. This is Act was passed in 1951. The siwai income recorded in the year 1923 is appreciably less than the actual income of the properties from these sources in 1951.\nSimilarly the income from consent money has to be calculated by taking the average income for ten years preceding the date of vesting and not the actual income as in the case of rent realized during the previous agricultural year. The expenditure has been inflated by taking in respect of the big forests the average income-tax paid during the period of thirty agricultural years\nNo agricultural income-tax existed during most of this period. It only came into existence recently. The cost of management has been calculated at a flat rate of eight to fifteen per cent\nThere can therefore be no doubt that the principles laid down for determination of compensation cannot be called equitable and they do not provided for payment of just compensation to the expropriated proprietor\nThe Petitioners case is that under the formula stated in the Act, a compensation of 25 lakhs which would be due to him on he basis of the value of property taken, has been reduced to a sum of Rs. 65,000 and is payable in thirty unspecified instalments and therefore it is purely nominal and illusory\nThe first and the main objection to the validity of the Act taken by the learned counsel is that the Bill was never passed into law\nthis objection is founded on the omission from the proceedings of the Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly dated the 5th April, 1950, of a statement to the effect that the Bill was put to the House by the speaker and was passed by it\nReference was made to rules 20,22, 34 and 115 of the rules regulating the procedure of the legislature framed under the Government of India Act, 1935, in the year 1936, which provides as follows - \n 20 (1). A matter requiring the decision of the Assembly shall be decided by means of a question put by the Speaker on a motion made by a member \n After a motion has been made, the speaker shall read the motion for the consideration of the Assembly. 34 (1) Votes may be taken by voices or division and shall be taken by division if any member so desires. The Speaker shall determine the method of taking votes by division. The result of a division shall be announced by the Speaker and shall not be challenged. 115 (1) The Secretary shall cause to be prepared a full report of the proceedings of the Assembly at each of its meetings and publish it as soon as practicable\nOne impression of this printed report shall be submitted to the Speaker for his confirmation and signature and when signed shall constitute the authentic record of the proceedings of the Assembly.\nIt was urged that the authentic report of the proceedings of the Assembly was conclusive on the point, that the Bill was not put to the Assembly by means of a question and was not voted upon, and hence it could not be said to have been passed by the legislature. It was said that even if there was no open opposition to the passing of the Bill, it was possible that if it was put to the Assembly, it might have rejected it.\nthe proceedings were signed by the Speaker on the 1st October, 1950, while the certificate that the Bill was passed was recorded by him on the original Bill when it was submitted to the President for his assent on the 10th May, 1950. \n The certificate of the Speaker is conclusive on the point that the Bill was passed by the legislature (Vide Craies Statute Law, 4th Edn., p. 36). It seems to me that by an oversight it was not recorded in the proceedings that the mission was put to and passed by the House and the Speaker while signing the proceedings six months after the event failed to notice the error. There can be no about that the sense of the House on the 5th April, 1950, was for passing the Bill and there was no one present who was for rejecting it.\nThe motion before the House that the Bill be passed. The Speaker could not possibly have appended a certificate on a Bill that it was passed by the House if it had not been so passed. There are no grounds whatever for doubting the correctness of his certificate. In my opinion the contention raised that the Bill was not passed into law fails and must be rejected\nNext it is contended that articles 31-A and 31-B have no application to this Bill as it never became law by following the procedure prescribed in the Constitution and that those articles have only application to a Bill that had becomes an Act\nThe Legislature of Madhya Pradesh consists of the Governor and the Legislative Assembly. It was said that even if the Bill was passed by the Legislative Assembly, it was not assented to by the Governor but was straightway sent to the President and that without the assent of the Governor the Bill could not become law despite the fact that it was assented to by the President and it was pointed out that sub-clause (3) of article 31 of the Constitution speaks of law being reserved for the consideration of President and not merely a Bill\nThis argument, in my opinion, has not much force having regard to the terms and scope of article 200. The Governor under that article could assent to a Bill or could reserve it for the consideration of the President at his option. The Governor being empowered to reserve the Bill for the consideration of the President and this having been done, it was for the President either to assent to the Bill or to withhold his assent. The President having given his assent, the Bill must be held to have been passed into law. It does not seem to have been intended that the Governor should give his assent to the Bill and make it a full-fledged law and then reserve it for the Presidents consideration so that it may have effect\nIt was said that only in case where this double procedure is followed that it could be said that the President had satisfied himself that the law did not contravene the provisions of article 31(2). In my opinion, the argument is fallacious. It would be a meaningless formality for the President to give his assent to the same Bill twice over\nI cannot see why the President cannot perform both the duties entrusted to him by articles 200 and 31(3) and (4) at one the same time. He is not disabled under the Constitution from applying his mind to such a Bill once and for all to see whether it has to be passed into law and whether it fulfils the requirements of article 31(2)\nThe Presidents assent therefore to the Bill attracts the application of articles 31-A and 31-B to it and deprives persons affected by it of the rights guaranteed in Part III of the Constitution.\nThe Provisions of article 31(4) support the view of the learned Attorney-General that what has to be sent to the President is the Bill as passed by the legislature and not the Bill after it has been assented to by the Governor. The article reads thus - If any Bill pending at the commencement of this Constitution in the Legislature of a State has, after it has been passed by such Legislature been reversed for the consideration of the President and has received his assent, them notwithstanding anything in this Constitution, the law so assented to shall not be called in question in any court on the ground that it contravenes the provisions of clause (2).\nIn this context the word Legislature means the House or Houses of Legislature and does not include the Governor with in its ambit. This word has not the same meaning in all the articles. In some articles it means the Governor as well as the Houses of Legislature, while in a number of other articles it only means the House or Houses of Legislature\nArticle 31(4) means that if any Bill contravening the provisions of clause (2) of article 31 is passed by the House or Houses of Legislature but is reserved for he consideration of the President and receives his assent, then it shall become law, not open to any objection on the ground of such contravention.\nNext it was contended that the obligation to pay compensation was implicit in the legislative power contained in entry 36 of List II and that the Act was unconstitutional as it had provided for acquisition of zamindaris without payment of compensation, the provisions relating to it being illusory\nThis contention fails for the reasons given in my judgment in the Bihar case. Moreover, the compensation provided for in the impugned Act cannot be dubbed as illusory. All that can be said is that it is grossly inadequate and it is not the equivalent of the value of the property acquired, but this issue is not justiciable in view of the provisions of article 31(4). This Bill was pending at the commencement of the Constitution, it was reserved for the consideration of the president and the President gave his assent to it\nThe conditions for the application of article 31(4) thus stand fulfilled. Besides the obstacle of article 31(4). two further hurdles, viz., of articles 31-A and 31-B introduced by the amendments to the Constitution, stand in the way of the petitioner and bar an enquiry into the question of the quantum of compensation. The contention that there is no public purpose behind the impugned Act has also to be repelled on the same reasoning as given by me in the Bihar case. The purpose behind the Act is to establish direct contact between tillers of the soil and the Government and to eliminate the intermediaries, as in the view of the Government this is for the welfare of the society as a whole. It is also the purpose of the Act to confer malik maqbuza status on occupancy tenants and improve their present position and to vest management of village affairs and cultivation in a democratic village body. It is too late in the day to contend that reform in this directions is not for general public benefit\nUnder the provisions of this Act compensation can in no case work out into a mere nothing. On the other hand, in every case some amount of compensation is payable and in the majority of cases it is also not inadequate,\nThe assessment of value by the petitioner cannot be taken at its full value. It cannot at any rate be held that legislation which provides for the payment of a sum of Rs. 65,000 provides for no compensation\nThe amount of instalments, if payment is to be in instalments, is bound to be fixed by the rules made under the statute and in case the rules are so made that they amount to an abuse of the exercise of that power, they can always be challenged on that ground. The argument that the Act is bad inasmuch as it delegates essential legislative power to the executive is negatived for the reasons given in the Bihar case\nA point was raised that the constitutional amendments in articles 31-A and 31-B could not affect the petitioners guaranteed rights contained in Part III of the Constitution in so far as the eighty malguzari villages were concerned, because those mahals did not fall within, the ambit of the word estate as defined in article 31-A. In sub-clause (2) (a) the definition is in these terms - The expression estate shall, in relation to any local area, have the same meaning as that expression or its local equivalent has in the existing law relating to land tenures in force in that area, and shall also include any jagir, inam or muafi or other similar grant. Section 2 (3) of Act II of 1917, C. P. Land Revenue Act, defines the expression estate thus - an estate as declared by the State Government. The learned Advocate - General conceded that these villages are not within the ambit of this definition but he contended that they are within the scope of the definition of the expression given in article 31-A, as mahals in Central Provisions are local equivalents of the expression estate, though not so declared by the Act. There is nothing on the record to support this contention\nThe contention that those eighty mahals are not an estateand are thus excluded from the reach of article 31-A does not, however very much advances the petitioners case, because the hurdles created in his way by articles 31-B and 31(4) stand in spite of the circumstances that article 31-A has no application\nArticle 31-B specifically validates certain Acts mentioned in the schedule despite the provisions of article 31-A and is not illustrative of article 31A but stands independent of it\nThe impugned Act in this situation qua the acquisition on the eighty malguzari villages cannot be questioned on the ground that it contravenes the provisions of article 31(2) of the Constitution or any of the other provisions of Part III. The applicability of article 31(4) is not limited to estates and its provisions save the law in its entirety. This petition is accordingly dismissed but in the circumstances I make no order as to costs\nMr. Bindra, who appeared for the petitioner placed reliance on the observations of Holmes C.J. in Communications Assns. v. Douds (339 U.S. 382, 384), viz., that the provisions of the Constitution are not mathematical formulas having their essence in their form they are orgnic living institutions transplanted from English soil. \n Their significance is vital, not formal it is to be gathered not simply by taking the words and a dictionary, but by considering their origin and the line of their growth, and contended that if the Constitution of India was constructed in the light of these observations, then despite the express provisions of article 31(2) it would be found that there is something pervading it which makes the obligations to pay real compensation a necessary incident of the compulsory acquisition of property. It was said that right to compensation is implied in entry 36 List II of the Seventh Schedule and that article 31(2) does not confer the right but merely protects it.\nThe dictum of Holmes C.J. has no application to the construction of a Constitution which has in express terms made the payment of compensation obligatory for compulsory acquisition of property, which again in express terms by an amendment of it, has deprived persons affected by the impugned Act of this right\nIt was within the competence of the Government in exercise of its governmental power to enhanced land revenue, to withdraw exemption of land revenue, wherever those had been granted, and to enact other laws of a similar character. There is no evidence whatsoever that all these enactments were enacted with a fraudulent design of defeating the provisions of payment of compensation contained in the Constitution. The Constitution had not even come into force by the time that most of these statutes were enacted. The petition is therefore dismissed.\nThe properties belonging to the petitioner and acquired under the statute were originally situate in an Indian State which became subsequently merged with Madhya Pradesh. It was contended that by the terms of the covenant of merger those properties were declared as the petitioners private properties and were protected from State legislation by the guarantee given in article 362 of the Constitution and hence the impugned Act was bad as it contravened the provisions of this article\nArticle 362 is in these terms - In the exercise of the power of Parliament or of the legislature of a State to make laws or in the exercise of the executive power of the Union or of a State due regard shall be had to the guarantee or assurance given under any such covenant or agreement as is referred to in clause (1) of article 291 with respect to the personal rights, privileges and dignities of the Ruler of an Indian State. Article 363 takes away the jurisdiction of the courts regarding disputes arising out of treaties agreements, covenants, engagements, sanads etc.\nIt is true that by the covenant of merger the properties of the petitioner became his private properties as distinguished from properties of the State but in respect of them he is no better position than any other owner possessing private property. Article 362 does not prohibit the acquisition of properties declared as private properties by the covenant of merger and does not guarantee their perpetual existence. The guarantee contained in the articles is of a limited extent only\nIt assures that the Rules properties declared as their private properties will not be claimed as State properties. \n The guarantee has no greater scope than this. That guarantee has been fully respected by the impugned statue as it treats treats those properties is their private properties and seeks to acquire them on that assumption. Moreover it seems to me that in view of the comprehensive language of article 363 this issue is not justiciable. This petition is accordingly dismissed\nSeven of these are by zamindars from Madhya Pradesh who are owners of estates. The petitioner in Petition No. 246 also owns certain malguzari villages\nPetitioner in Petition No. 237 is a malguzar of eighteen villages but owns no estate. Petitions Nos. 280 to 285 and 257 relate to merged territories. The petitioner in Petition No. 282 was ruler of a State (Jashpur) and the petition concerns his private properties\nPetitioners in Petitions Nos. 283, 284 and 285 are Ilakadars and in Petitions Nos. 280 and 285 they are mafidars. Petitioner in Petition No. 281 is a Thikedar i.e., revenue farmer of three villages\nMr. Swami reiterated the contention raised by Mr. Somayya that the Act was not duly passed by the legislature\nFor the reasons given in Petition No. 166 of 1951, I see no force in this contention\nSwami also reiterated Mr. Bindras contention that the legislation was not bona fide.\nFor the reasons given in Petition No. 317, this contention is not accepted.\nSwami Vehemently argued that the Government has by this Act become a super- zamindar, that there is no public purpose behind the Act, that there is no change in the existing order of things, that the Act has achieved nothing new, the tenants remain as they were, the malikan cabza were also already in existence, that acquisition of that status by occupancy tenants was possible under existing statutes and that they had also the power of transfer of their holdings\nIn my opinion, the argument is based on a fallacy. As already stated, the purpose of the Act is to bring about reforms in the land tenure system of the State by establishing direct contact between the tillers of the soil and the Government. These petitions are accordingly dismissed\nMr. Mukherji who appeared in this petition merely adopted the arguments taken in other petitioners. For the reasons given therein this petition is also dismissed,\nMr. Jog appeared in this petition and raised the same points as in other petitions. This petition also fails and is dismissed", + "expert_4": "This is a petition under article 32 of the Constitution of India by Shri Visheswar Rao, zamindar and proprietor of Ahiri zamindari, an estate as defined in section 2 (3) of the Central Provinces Land Revenue Act, II of 1917, and situated in tehsil Sironcha, district Chanda (Madhya Pradesh), for the enforcement of his fundamental right to property under article 31(1) of the Constitution by the issue of an appropriate writ or a direction to the respondent State restraining it from disturbing his possession of the estate, and eighty malguzari villages situate in the Garchiroli tehsil of the same district.\nThe petitioner and his ancestors have been owing and enjoying these properties in full proprietary right for several generations past. \nOn the 5th April, 1950, the Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly enacted an Act called the Madhya Pradesh Abolition of Proprietary Right Act. The Act received the assent of the President of India on the 22nd January, 1951, and was published in the Madhya Pradesh Gazette on the 26th January, 1951, as Act I of 1951.\nBy a notification in a gazette extraordinary issued on the 27th January, 1951, the Madhya Pradesh Government fixed 31st March 1951, as the date of vesting of the estates under section 3 of the Act. The petitioner thus was to lose his estate and lands on the 31st March 1951\nBy an agreement of merger made between the rules of States and the Dominion of in India dated the 15th December 1947, certain territories which at one time were under the Indian States Agency and were held by these rulers were integrated with the Dominion. The intergration actually took place on the 1st January, 1948. \nOn the 1st August, 1949, the States were merged in the Madhya Pradesh. There were in all 106 estates in Madhya Pradesh as defined in section 2 (3) of Act I of 1951 and held by zamindars. Most of the lands are owned by malguzars of mahals in the status of Malkan cabza. The land system prevailing in Madhya Pradesh is malguzari (except in certain areas where the ryotwari system is in vogue), the malguzar being an intermediary between the State and the tiller.\nLand is also held on a variety of subordinate tenures by absolute occupancy tenants, occupancy tenants, ryots, thikedars, mafidars ilaqadars etc. Land revenue in Madhya Pradesh was last assessed under the Central Provinces Land Revenue Act, II of 1917. The estate holders pay land revenue on the lands comprised in the estates at a concession rate. The payment is technically called tekoli In 1939 there was an ad hoc increase in the amount of tekoli by the Central Provinces Revision of Land Revenue Estates Act, I of 1939. On the 3rd September 1946 the Central Provinces and Bear Legislative Assembly passed a resolution for the elimination of intermediaries between the State and the peasant. Soon after passing of this resolution several laws were enacted, it is said with a view to achieve this result, the impugned Act being the last of the series.\nIn 1947, the Central Provinces Land Revenue Estates Act, XXV of 1947, was enacted. The revenue assessment, viz., tekoli, on the estates was, we are told enhanced, in some places from thirty to fifty per cent, of the full jama and in others from forty to sixty per cent. \nIn the same year was enacted the Central Provinces Land Revenue Revision Mahals Act, XXVI of 1947. The land assessment on malguzari villages was it is alleged, raised to 75 per cent. from 45 to 50 per cent. of malguzari assets. This was done without recourse to a settlement. In 1948 came the Central Provinces and Berar Revocation of Exemptions Act, XXXVII of 1948, making persons exempted from payment of land revenue liable for it.\nThis legislation, it is urged, resulted in the reduction of the net income of the proprietors to a large extent.\nOn the 11th October, 1949, the impugned Act was introduced in the Madhya Pradesh Assembly. It was referred to a Select Committee on the 15th October, 1949 the Select Committee reported on the 9th March, 1950, the report was published on the 17th March, 1950, and was taken into consideration on the 29th March, 1950, by the Assembly.\nAgainst the constitutionality of this Act a number of petitioners were made in the High Court of Nagpur but they were all dismissed by that court on the 9th April, while this petition along with some others was pending in this Court.\nThe preamble of the Act is in these terms - An Act to provide for the acquisition of the rights of proprietors in estates, mahals, alienated villages and alienated lands in Madhya Pradesh and to make provision for other matters connected there with.\nThe legislation clearly falls within entry 36 of List II of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution. The Madhya Pradesh Legislature had therefore undoubted competence to enact it.\nThe Act is divided into eleven chapters and three schedules. Chapter II deals with the vesting of proprietary rights in the State and states the consequences of the vesting. Section 3 is in these terms - Save as other wise provided in this Act, on and from a date to be specified by a notification by the State Government in this behalf all proprietary rights in an estate, mahal alienated village or alienated land, as the case may be, in the area specified in the notification vesting in a proprietor of such estate, mahal, alienated village, alienated land, or in a person having interest in such proprietary right through the proprietor, shall pass from such proprietor or such other person to and vest in the State for the purposes of the State free of all encumbrances \n Section 4 provides that after the publication of the notification under Section 3, all rights titles and interest vesting in the proprietor or any person having interest in such proprietary right through the proprietor in such area including land (cultivable or barren), grass land, scrub jungle, forest trees fishes, wells, tanks ponds water-channels, ferries, pathways, villages sites, hats bazars and meals and in all subsoil including rights if any in mines and minerals, whether being worked or not, shall cease and be vested in the State for purposes of the State free of all encumbrances but that the proprietor shall continue to retain the possession of his homestead, home-farm land, and in the Central Provisions, also of land brought under cultivation by him after the agricultural year 1948-49 but before the date of vesting.\nThe proprietor is entitled to recover any sums which became due to him before the date of vesting by virtue of his proprietor rights. All open enclosures used for agricultural or domestic purposes, all buildings, places of worship wells situated in and trees standings on lands included in such enclosures or house sites etc. continue to remain in possession of proprietor and are to be settled with him by the State Government on such terms and conditions as it may determine. Similarly, certain private wells, trees tanks and groves continue to remain in possession of proprietor or other person who may be interested in them.\nIn addition to all these amounts, the State Government has pay compensation for lands within the area of a municipality or cantonment in accordance with the rules contained in Schedule II. The Compensation for divestment of proprietary rights becomes due from the date vesting and it is enacted that it shall carry interest at the rate of two and a half per cent. per annum from the date of vestings to the date of payment. Section 9 provides as follows - \n The compensation payable under section 8, may, in accordance with the rules made in this behalf, be paid in one or more of the following modes, namely - \n in cash in full or in annual instalments not exceeding thirty \n in bonds either negotiable or not negotiable carrying interest at the rate specified in sub-section (4) of section 8 and of guaranteed face value maturing within a specified period not exceeding thirty years.\nSchedule II lays down the measure of compensation on a scale varying from five to fifteen times the assessment on the land as specified in the schedule. Section 2 of the Schedule I provides for the calculation of the gross income by adding the amount of income received by a proprietor from the aggregate of the rents from the tenants as recorded in the jamabandi for the previous agricultural year the siwai income that is income from various sources such as jalkar, bankar, phalkar, hats, bazars, melas grazing and village forest calculated at two times the income recorded in the current settlement of 1923 and the consent money on transfer of tenancy lands-the average of transactions recorded in the village papers for ten years preceding the agricultural year in which the date of vesting falls. The schedule also provides the method of determination of the gross income of a mahal as well as of an alienated village or alienated land separately. It also provides for the determination of this income in the case of mines and forests.\nThe method suggested for assessing the net income is that out of the gross income the following items have to be deducted, i.e. assessed land revenue, sums payable during the previous agricultural year on account of cesses and local rates, the average of income-tax paid in respect of income received from big forests during the period of thirty agricultural years preceding the agricultural year in which the relevant date falls and cost of management varying from 8 to 15 per cent. of the gross annual income on incomes varying from Rs. 2,000 to Rs. 15,000. It is further provided that not withstanding anything contained in sub-rule (2) the net incomes shall in case be reduced to less than five per cent.\nof the gross income.\nIt is provided herein that a proprietor who has been divested of his estate will have malik-makbuza rights in his homenfarm lands.\nAbsolute occupancy tenants and occupancy tenants can also acquire malik - makbuza rights. Provision is made for reservation of grazing lands and for the collection of land revenue. Similar provisions are made in Chapter VII in respect of management and tenures of land in the merged territories. Chapter VIII deals with management and tenures of lands in Berar. Separate provision has been made for the determination of compensation payable to lessees of mines and minerals.\nThe main purpose of the Act is to bring the actual tillers of the soil in direct contract with the State by the elimination of intermediary holders. In short, the Act aims at converting malguzari into ryotwari land system. In also aims at giving to the gram panchayats the management of common lands freed from the grip of proprietors and contemplates the establishment of self-government for the villages.\nThe result is that in every case some amount of money becomes payable by the State by way of compensation to the proprietor and in no case does the compensation work into a negative sum or to a mere zero or a minus figure. In other respects the provisions of the Act in regard to compensation follow the pattern which is common to all zamindari legislation, which is to inflate the amount of expenditure and deflate the actual income.\nThe siwai income from jalkar, bankar, etc. and from village forests is calculated at two times the siwai income recorded in the settlement made in 1923. This is Act was passed in 1951. The siwai income recorded in the year 1923 is appreciably less than the actual income of the properties from these sources in 1951.\nThe siwai income from jalkar, bankar, etc. and from village forests is calculated at two times the siwai income recorded in the settlement made in 1923. This is Act was passed in 1951. The siwai income recorded in the year 1923 is appreciably less than the actual income of the properties from these sources in 1951. Similarly the income from consent money has to be calculated by taking the average income for ten years preceding the date of vesting and not the actual income as in the case of rent realized during the previous agricultural year.\nNo agricultural income-tax existed during most of this\nperiod.\nIt only came into existence recently. The cost of management has been calculated at a flat rate of eight to fifteen per cent.\nTotal 1,35,000 Deductions permissible under the Act are the following - \n Revenue 45,000 \n Income-tax on 30 years average 66,600 \n Cost of management 21,000 Total ------- 1,32,600 Net income 2,400 \n Ten times net income would be Rs. 24,000 but as the net income cannot be reduced below five per cent. of the gross income which comes to Rs. 6500, compensation payable is Rs. 65,000 while the yearly income of the petitioner was in the neighbourhood of Rs. 5,65,000 and the market value of his property is 25 lakhs.\nThe first and the main objection to the validity of the Act taken by the learned counsel is that the Bill was never passed into law. As already indicated, this objection is founded on the omission from the proceedings of the Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly dated the 5th April, 1950, of a statement to the effect that the Bill was put to the House by the speaker and was passed by it.\nReference was made to rules 20,22, 34 and 115 of the rules regulating the procedure of the legislature framed under the Government of India Act, 1935, in the year 1936, which provides as follows - \n 20 (1).\nA matter requiring the decision of the Assembly shall be decided by means of a question put by the Speaker on a motion made by a member \n After a motion has been made, the speaker shall read the motion for the consideration of the Assembly. 34 (1) Votes may be taken by voices or division and shall be taken by division if any member so desires. The Speaker shall determine the method of taking votes by division.\nThe result of a division shall be announced by the Speaker and shall not be challenged. 115 (1) The Secretary shall cause to be prepared a full report of the proceedings of the Assembly at each of its meetings and publish it as soon as practicable.\nOne impression of this printed report shall be submitted to the Speaker for his confirmation and signature and when signed shall constitute the authentic record of the proceedings of the Assembly.\nIt was urged that the authentic report of the proceedings of the Assembly was conclusive on the point, that the Bill was not put to the Assembly by means of a question and was not voted upon, and hence it could not be said to have been passed by the legislature. It was said that even if there was no open opposition to the passing of the Bill, it was possible that if it was put to the Assembly, it might have rejected it.\nAs already pointed out, the proceedings were signed by the Speaker on the 1st October, 1950, while the certificate that the Bill was passed was recorded by him on the original Bill when it was submitted to the President for his assent on the 10th May, 1950.\nThe certificate of the Speaker is conclusive on the point that the Bill was passed by the legislature (Vide Craies Statute Law, 4th Edn., p. 36). It seems to me that by an oversight it was not recorded in the proceedings that the mission was put to and passed by the House and the Speaker while signing the proceedings six months after the event failed to notice the error.\nThere can be no about that the sense of the House on the 5th April, 1950, was for passing the Bill and there was no one present who was for rejecting it.\nThe motion before the House that the Bill be passed. The Speaker could not possibly have appended a certificate on a Bill that it was passed by the House if it had not been so passed.\nThere are no grounds whatever for doubting the correctness of his certificate. In my opinion the contention raised that the Bill was not passed into law fails and must be rejected. Next it is contended that articles 31-A and 31-B have no application to this Bill as it never became law by following the procedure prescribed in the Constitution and that those articles have only application to a Bill that had becomes an Act.\nThere are no grounds whatever for doubting the correctness of his certificate.\nThe Legislature of Madhya Pradesh consists of the Governor and the Legislative Assembly. It was said that even if the Bill was passed by the Legislative Assembly, it was not assented to by the Governor but was straightway sent to the President and that without the assent of the Governor the Bill could not become law despite the fact that it was assented to by the President and it was pointed out that sub-clause (3) of article 31 of the Constitution speaks of law being reserved for the consideration of President and not merely a Bill.\nThis argument, in my opinion, has not much force having regard to the terms and scope of article 200.\nThe Governor under that article could assent to a Bill or could reserve it for the consideration of the President at his option. The Governor being empowered to reserve the Bill for the consideration of the President and this having been done, it was for the President either to assent to the Bill or to withhold his assent. The President having given his assent, the Bill must be held to have been passed into law. It does not seem to have been intended that the Governor should give his assent to the Bill and make it a full-fledged law and then reserve it for the Presidents consideration so that it may have effect.\nSomayya pressed the point that the President could not perform both his functions under article 200 and article 31(4) concerning this Bill at one and the same time, that first the procedure laid down in article 200 for the passing of the Bill in to law should been followed, i.e. the Governor should have either assented to the Bill or should have reserved it for the consideration of the President and if it was so reserved, the President should then have given his assent and the Bill would then become law, that after the Bill had become law, the Governor should again have reserved this Bill for the consideration of the President as required by the provisions of article 31(3) in order to make it effective law against the provision of article 31(2) and that if the President then gave his assent, the law so assented to could not be called in question in a court of law. \n It was said that only in case where this double procedure is followed that it could be said that the President had satisfied himself that the law did not contravene the provisions of article 31(2).\nIn my opinion, the argument is fallacious.\nIt would be a meaningless formality for the President to give his assent to the same Bill twice over. I cannot see why the President cannot perform both the duties entrusted to him by articles 200 and 31(3) and (4) at one the same time.\nHe is not disabled under the Constitution from applying his mind to such a Bill once and for all to see whether it has to be passed into law and whether it fulfils the requirements of article 31(2).\nThe Presidents assent therefore to the Bill attracts the application of articles 31-A and 31-B to it and deprives persons affected by it of the rights guaranteed in Part III of the Constitution. The Provisions of article 31(4) support the view of the learned Attorney-General that what has to be sent to the President is the Bill as passed by the legislature and not the Bill after it has been assented to by the Governor.\nThe article reads thus - If any Bill pending at the commencement of this Constitution in the Legislature of a State has, after it has been passed by such Legislature been reversed for the consideration of the President and has received his assent, them notwithstanding anything in this Constitution, the law so assented to shall not be called in question in any court on the ground that it contravenes the provisions of clause (2).\nIn this context the word Legislature means the House or Houses of Legislature and does not include the Governor with in its ambit. This word has not the same meaning in all the articles.\nIn some articles it means the Governor as well as the Houses of Legislature, while in a number of other articles it only means the House or Houses of Legislature.\nArticle 31(4) means that if any Bill contravening the provisions of clause (2) of article 31 is passed by the House or Houses of Legislature but is reserved for he consideration of the President and receives his assent, then it shall become law, not open to any objection on the ground of such contravention.\nNext it was contended that the obligation to pay compensation was implicit in the legislative power contained in entry 36 of List II and that the Act was unconstitutional as it had provided for acquisition of zamindaris without payment of compensation, the provisions relating to it being illusory.\nThis contention fails for the reasons given in my judgment in the Bihar case. Moreover, the compensation provided for in the impugned Act cannot be dubbed as illusory.\nAll that can be said is that it is grossly inadequate and it is not the equivalent of the value of the property acquired, but this issue is not justiciable in view of the provisions of article 31(4).\nThis Bill was pending at the commencement of the Constitution, it was reserved for the consideration of the president and the President gave his assent to it. The conditions for the application of article 31(4) thus stand fulfilled.\nBesides the obstacle of article 31(4). two further hurdles, viz., of articles 31-A and 31-B introduced by the amendments to the Constitution, stand in the way of the petitioner and bar an enquiry into the question of the quantum of compensation.\nThe contention that there is no public purpose behind the impugned Act has also to be repelled on the same reasoning as given by me in the Bihar case. The purpose behind the Act is to establish direct contact between tillers of the soil and the Government and to eliminate the intermediaries, as in the view of the Government this is for the welfare of the society as a whole.\nIt is also the purpose of the Act to confer malik maqbuza status on occupancy tenants and improve their present position and to vest management of village affairs and cultivation in a democratic village body.\nIt is too late in the day to contend that reform in this directions is not for general public benefit.\nThe next argument of Mr. Somayya that the Act is a fraud on the Constitution in that in legislating under entry 42 of List III, it has legislated for non-payment of compensation has also to be repelled, for the reasons given in the Bihar case.\nUnder the provisions of this Act compensation can in no case work out into a mere nothing.\nOn the other hand, in every case some amount of compensation is payable and in the majority of cases it is also not inadequate\nMr. Somayya contended that payment of Rs. 65,000 as compensation to his client for property worth twenty-five lakhs of rupees was purely illusory. \n The assessment of value by the petitioner cannot be taken at its full value.\nIt cannot at any rate be held that legislation which provides for the payment of a sum of Rs. 65,000 provides for no compensation. The amount of instalments, if payment is to be in instalments, is bound to be fixed by the rules made under the statute and in case the rules are so made that they amount to an abuse of the exercise of that power, they can always be challenged on that ground. The argument that the Act is bad inasmuch as it delegates essential legislative power to the executive is negatived for the reasons given in the Bihar case.\nA point was raised that the constitutional amendments in articles 31-A and 31-B could not affect the petitioners guaranteed rights contained in Part III of the Constitution in so far as the eighty malguzari villages were concerned, because those mahals did not fall within, the ambit of the word estate as defined in article 31-A.\nIn sub-clause (2) (a) the definition is in these terms - The expression estate shall, in relation to any local area, have the same meaning as that expression or its local equivalent has in the existing law relating to land tenures in force in that area, and shall also include any jagir, inam or muafi or other similar grant. Section 2 (3) of Act II of 1917, C.\nP. Land Revenue Act, defines the expression estate thus - an estate as declared by the State Government. The learned Advocate - General conceded that these villages are not within the ambit of this definition but he contended that they are within the scope of the definition of the expression given in article 31-A, as mahals in Central Provisions are local equivalents of the expression estate, though not so declared by the Act.\nThere is nothing on the record to support this contention. The contention that those eighty mahals are not an estateand are thus excluded from the reach of article 31-A does not, however very much advances the petitioners case, because the hurdles created in his way by articles 31-B and 31(4) stand in spite of the circumstances that article 31-A has no application. It was contended that article 31-B was merely illustrative of the rule stated in article 31-A and if article 31-A had no application, that article also should be left out of consideration\nReference was made to the decision of the Privy Council in King Emperor v. Sibnath Banerjee ((1945) L.R. 72 I.A. 241 1945 F.C.R. 195), on the construction of sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 2 of the Defence of India Act.\nThe material portion of section 2 considered in that case runs thus - \n (1). The Central Government may, be notification in the official gazette, make such rules as appear to it to be necessary or expedient for securing the defence of Birth India, the Public safety, the maintenance of public order or the efficient prosecution of war, or for maintaining supplies and services essential to the life of the community. (2) without prejudice to the generality of the powers conferred by sub-section (1), the rule may provide for, or may, empower any authority to make orders providing for all any of the following matters, namely \n Their Lordships made the following observations about the meaning to be given to the language of sub-section (2) -- the function of sub - section (2) is merely an illustrative one the rule-making, power is conferred by sub-section (1), and the rules which are referred to in the opening sentence of sub-section (2) are the rules which are authorised by, and made under, sub-section (1) the provisions of sub-section (2) are not restrictive of sub-section (1), as indeed is expressly stated by the words without prejudice to the generality of the power conferred by sub-section (1). Article 31-B is in these terms - \n Without prejudice to the generality of the provisions continued in article in article 31-A none, of the Acts and Regulations specified in the Ninth Schedule nor any of the provisions thereof shall be deemed to be void on the ground that such Act, Regulation or provision is inconsistent with, or takes away or abridges any of the rights conferred by, any provisions of this Part, and notwithstanding any judgment, decree or order of the court or tribunal to the contrary, each of the said Acts and Regulations shall, subject to the power of any competent Legislature to repeal or amend it, continue in force.\nOn the basis of the similarity of the language in the opening part of article 31-B with that of sub-section (2) of section 2 part of the Defence of India Act, without prejudice to the generality of the provisions contained in article 31-A, it was urged that article 31-B was merely illustrative of article 31-A and as the latter was limited in its application to estates as defined therein, article 31-B was also so limited. In my opinion, the observations in Sibnath Banerjees case ((1945) L.R. 72 I.A. 241 1945 F.C.R. 195), far from supporting the contention raised, negatives it. Article 31-B specifically validates certain Acts mentioned in the schedule despite the provisions of article 31-A and is not illustrative of article 31A but stands independent of it.\nThe impugned Act in this situation qua the acquisition on the eighty malguzari villages cannot be questioned on the ground that it contravenes the provisions of article 31(2) of the Constitution or any of the other provisions of Part III. The applicability of article 31(4) is not limited to estates and its provisions save the law in its entirety. This petition is accordingly dismissed but in the circumstances I make no order as to costs.\nPetition No. 317 of 1951. Mr. Bindra, who appeared for the petitioner placed reliance on the observations of Holmes C.J. in Communications Assns. v. Douds (339 U.S. 382, 384), viz., that the provisions of the Constitution are not mathematical formulas having their essence in their form they are orgnic living institutions transplanted from English soil.\nTheir significance is vital, not formal it is to be gathered not simply by taking the words and a dictionary, but by considering their origin and the line of their growth, and contended that if the Constitution of India was constructed in the light of these observations, then despite the express provisions of article 31(2) it would be found that there is something pervading it which makes the obligations to pay real compensation a necessary incident of the compulsory acquisition of property. It was said that right to compensation is implied in entry 36 List II of the Seventh Schedule and that article 31(2) does not confer the right but merely protects it. Mr. Bindra merely tried to annotate the arguments of Mr. Das but with no better result.\nThe dictum of Holmes C.J. has no application to the construction of a Constitution which has in express terms made the payment of compensation obligatory for compulsory acquisition of property, which again in express terms by an amendment of it, has deprived persons affected by the impugned Act of this right.\nOne further point taken by Mr. Bindra was that nationalization of land is a separate head of legislation and that acquisition in general does not fall within the scope of entry 36 List II of the Seventh Schedule.\nStephens Commentaries on the Laws of England, Vol.\nIII, p. 541\nThe passage, however read in its entirety, negatives the contention. It may be mentioned that under powers of compulsory acquisition a number of properties have been nationalized in England and other countries.\nLastly, it was urged that the legislation in question was not enacted bona fide inasmuch as in 1946 the legislature having passed a resolution to end zamindaries, proceeded to enact laws with the purpose of defeating the constitutional guarantees regarding payment of compensation by various devices.\nAs a first step in this direction the revenue was enhanced in order to reduce the gross income of the zamindars, then other Acts mentioned in the earlier part of the main judgment were enacted with the same end in view. In my opinion this argument is void of force.\nIt was within the competence of the Government in exercise of its governmental power to enhanced land revenue, to withdraw exemption of land revenue, wherever those had been granted, and to enact other laws of a similar character.\nThere is no evidence whatsoever that all these enactments were enacted with a fraudulent design of defeating the provisions of payment of compensation contained in the Constitution. The Constitution had not even come into force by the time that most of these statutes were enacted.\nThe petition is therefore dismissed.\nIt was contended that by the terms of the covenant of merger those properties were declared as the petitioners private properties and were protected from State legislation by the guarantee given in article 362 of the Constitution and hence the impugned Act was bad as it contravened the provisions of this article.\nArticle 362 is in these terms - In the exercise of the power of Parliament or of the legislature of a State to make laws or in the exercise of the executive power of the Union or of a State due regard shall be had to the guarantee or assurance given under any such covenant or agreement as is referred to in clause (1) of article 291 with respect to the personal rights, privileges and dignities of the Ruler of an Indian State. Article 363 takes away the jurisdiction of the courts regarding disputes arising out of treaties agreements, covenants, engagements, sanads etc.\nArticle 363 takes away the jurisdiction of the courts regarding disputes arising out of treaties agreements, covenants, engagements, sanads etc. It is true that by the covenant of merger the properties of the petitioner became his private properties as distinguished from properties of the State but in respect of them he is no better position than any other owner possessing private property. Article 362 does not prohibit the acquisition of properties declared as private properties by the covenant of merger and does not guarantee their perpetual existence. The guarantee contained in the articles is of a limited extent only. It assures that the Rules properties declared as their private properties will not be claimed as State properties. \n The guarantee has no greater scope than this.\nMr. Swami Vehemently argued that the Government has by this Act become a super- zamindar, that there is no public purpose behind the Act, that there is no change in the existing order of things, that the Act has achieved nothing new, the tenants remain as they were, the malikan cabza were also already in existence, that acquisition of that status by occupancy tenants was possible under existing statutes and that they had also the power of transfer of their holdings.\nmy opinion, the argument is based on a fallacy.\nAs already stated, the purpose of the Act is to bring about reforms in the land tenure system of the State by establishing direct contact between the tillers of the soil and the Government.\nThese petitions are accordingly dismissed. I make no order of costs in them.", + "expert_5": "On the 5th April, 1950, the Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly enacted an Act called the Madhya Pradesh Abolition of Proprietary Right Act. The Act received the assent of the President of India on the 22nd January, 1951, and was published in the Madhya Pradesh Gazette on the 26th January, 1951, as Act I of 1951. By a notification in a gazette extraordinary issued on the 27th January, 1951, the Madhya Pradesh Government fixed 31st March 1951, as the date of vesting of the estates under section 3 of the Act.\nOn the 11th October, 1949, the impugned Act was introduced in the Madhya Pradesh Assembly. It was referred to a Select Committee on the 15th October, 1949 the Select Committee reported on the 9th March, 1950, the report was published on the 17th March, 1950, and was taken into consideration on the 29th March, 1950, by the Assembly.\nOn the 5th April, 1950, the member in charge of the Bill moved as follows - \n Speaker Sir, I now move that the Central Provinces Berar Abolition of Proprietary Rights (Estates, Mahals Alienated Lands) Bill, 1949 (No. 64 of 1949) as considered by the House be passed into law. The Honble the Speaker said Motion moved that the Central Provisions Berar Abolition of Proprietary Rights (Estates, Mahals, Alienated Lands) Bill 1949 (No. 64 of 1949) as considered by the House be passed into law, \n A number of speeches were made at the third reading stage.\nthere was no opposition whatsoever to the passing of the Bill.\nThe original Bill that was submitted to the President for his assent was printed on the 29th April, 1950, and it bears on it the certificate of the Speaker dated the 10th May, 1950, stating that the Bill was duly passed by the legislature on the 5th April, 1950.\nThis certificate was signed by the Speaker a considerable time ahead of his signing the proceedings. The Act, as already stated, received the assent of the President on the 22nd January, 1951, and was published in the Madhya Pradesh Gazette on the 26th January, 1951, as Madhya Pradesh Act I of 1951\nThe preamble of the Act is in these terms - An Act to provide for the acquisition of the rights of proprietors in estates, mahals, alienated villages and alienated lands in Madhya Pradesh and to make provision for other matters connected there with.\nThe legislation clearly falls within entry 36 of List II of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution. The Madhya Pradesh Legislature had therefore undoubted competence to enact it.\nThe main purpose of the Act is to bring the actual tillers of the soil in direct contract with the State by the elimination of intermediary holders.\nthe Act aims at converting malguzari into ryotwari land system.\nThe provisions of the Act in respect of payment of compensation, though they do not in any way provide for an equivalent in money of the property taken and in that sense may not be adequate cannot be called illusory.\nAs already pointed out, the proceedings were signed by the Speaker on the 1st October, 1950, while the certificate that the Bill was passed was recorded by him on the original Bill when it was submitted to the President for his assent on the 10th May, 1950.\nThe certificate of the Speaker is conclusive on the point that the Bill was passed by the legislature (Vide Craies Statute Law, 4th Edn., p. 36).\nThe Speaker could not possibly have appended a certificate on a Bill that it was passed by the House if it had not been so passed.\nThere are no grounds whatever for doubting the correctness of his certificate.\nIn my opinion the contention raised that the Bill was not passed into law fails and must be rejected.\nThis argument, in my opinion, has not much force having regard to the terms and scope of article 200.\nThe Governor under that article could assent to a Bill or could reserve it for the consideration of the President at his option.\nThe Governor being empowered to reserve the Bill for the consideration of the President and this having been done, it was for the President either to assent to the Bill or to withhold his assent.\nThe President having given his assent, the Bill must be held to have been passed into law.\nIt does not seem to have been intended that the Governor should give his assent to the Bill and make it a full-fledged law and then reserve it for the Presidents consideration so that it may have effect.\nIt would be a meaningless formality for the President to give his assent to the same Bill twice over. I cannot see why the President cannot perform both the duties entrusted to him by articles 200 and 31(3) and (4) at one the same time.\nHe is not disabled under the Constitution from applying his mind to such a Bill once and for all to see whether it has to be passed into law and whether it fulfils the requirements of article 31(2).\nThe Presidents assent therefore to the Bill attracts the application of articles 31-A and 31-B to it and deprives persons affected by it of the rights guaranteed in Part III of the Constitution.\nIf any Bill pending at the commencement of this Constitution in the Legislature of a State has, after it has been passed by such Legislature been reversed for the consideration of the President and has received his assent, them notwithstanding anything in this Constitution, the law so assented to shall not be called in question in any court on the ground that it contravenes the provisions of clause (2).\nIn this context the word Legislature means the House or Houses of Legislature and does not include the Governor with in its ambit.\nArticle 31(4) means that if any Bill contravening the provisions of clause (2) of article 31 is passed by the House or Houses of Legislature but is reserved for he consideration of the President and receives his assent, then it shall become law, not open to any objection on the ground of such contravention.\nThis contention fails for the reasons given in my judgment in the Bihar case.\nMoreover, the compensation provided for in the impugned Act cannot be dubbed as illusory.\nAll that can be said is that it is grossly inadequate and it is not the equivalent of the value of the property acquired, but this issue is not justiciable in view of the provisions of article 31(4).\nThis Bill was pending at the commencement of the Constitution, it was reserved for the consideration of the president and the President gave his assent to it. The conditions for the application of article 31(4) thus stand fulfilled.\nThe purpose behind the Act is to establish direct contact between tillers of the soil and the Government and to eliminate the intermediaries, as in the view of the Government this is for the welfare of the society as a whole.\nIt is also the purpose of the Act to confer malik maqbuza status on occupancy tenants and improve their present position and to vest management of village affairs and cultivation in a democratic village body.\nIt cannot at any rate be held that legislation which provides for the payment of a sum of Rs. 65,000 provides for no compensation.\nThe amount of instalments, if payment is to be in instalments, is bound to be fixed by the rules made under the statute and in case the rules are so made that they amount to an abuse of the exercise of that power, they can always be challenged on that ground.\nThe argument that the Act is bad inasmuch as it delegates essential legislative power to the executive is negatived for the reasons given in the Bihar case.\nThe expression estate shall, in relation to any local area, have the same meaning as that expression or its local equivalent has in the existing law relating to land tenures in force in that area, and shall also include any jagir, inam or muafi or other similar grant.\nSection 2 (3) of Act II of 1917, C. P. Land Revenue Act, defines the expression estate thus - an estate as declared by the State Government.\nthe hurdles created in his way by articles 31-B and 31(4) stand in spite of the circumstances that article 31-A has no application.\nArticle 31-B specifically validates certain Acts mentioned in the schedule despite the provisions of article 31-A and is not illustrative of article 31A but stands independent of it.\nThe impugned Act in this situation qua the acquisition on the eighty malguzari villages cannot be questioned on the ground that it contravenes the provisions of article 31(2) of the Constitution or any of the other provisions of Part III.\nThe applicability of article 31(4) is not limited to estates and its provisions save the law in its entirety.\nThe dictum of Holmes C.J. has no application to the construction of a Constitution which has in express terms made the payment of compensation obligatory for compulsory acquisition of property, which again in express terms by an amendment of it, has deprived persons affected by the impugned Act of this right.\nIt was within the competence of the Government in exercise of its governmental power to enhanced land revenue, to withdraw exemption of land revenue, wherever those had been granted, and to enact other laws of a similar character. There is no evidence whatsoever that all these enactments were enacted with a fraudulent design of defeating the provisions of payment of compensation contained in the Constitution. The Constitution had not even come into force by the time that most of these statutes were enacted.\nIt is true that by the covenant of merger the properties of the petitioner became his private properties as distinguished from properties of the State but in respect of them he is no better position than any other owner possessing private property.\nArticle 362 does not prohibit the acquisition of properties declared as private properties by the covenant of merger and does not guarantee their perpetual existence.\nThe guarantee contained in the articles is of a limited extent only. It assures that the Rules properties declared as their private properties will not be claimed as State properties. \n The guarantee has no greater scope than this. That guarantee has been fully respected by the impugned statue as it treats treats those properties is their private properties and seeks to acquire them on that assumption.\nAs already stated, the purpose of the Act is to bring about reforms in the land tenure system of the State by establishing direct contact between the tillers of the soil and the Government.\nMukherjea, J. \n I agree with my Lord the Chief Justice that these petitions should be dismissed.\nThe Madhya Pradesh Abolition of Proprietary Rights (Estates, Mahals, Alienated Lands) Act 1950 (Act I of 1951) having on January 22, 1951), received the assent of the President of India a Notification was published in the Madhya Pradesh Gazette of January 27, 1951, fixing March 31, 1951, as the date of vesting of all propriety rights in the State under section 3 of the Act.\nThe Bill was introduced in the Madhya Pradesh Assembly on 11th October, 1949. It was referred to a Select Committee on 15th October 1949. The Select Committee made its Report on 9th March, 1950, which was presented to the Assembly on 29th March, 1950. The Assembly considered the Bill in the light of the Report between that date and 5th April 1950, during which period the amendments proposed by the Selected Committee were moved and disposed of. It appears from the Official Proceeding of the Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly of 5th April, 1950 that the after the last amendment had put to the House and accepted, the Honble Minister for Education (Sri P. S. Deshmukh) moved that the Bill be passed into law and and delivered a short speech inviting the members to finally pass the Bill. \n The Speaker then read out the motion. Then followed speeches by 11 speakers congratulating the Government and some of the members who took an active part in carrying, through this important measure of land reform and relief to the tillers of the soil. Nobody put forward any reasoned amendment and the trend of the speeches shows that the House accepted the Bill.\nIt only shows that the House passed on to discuss another Bill, namely the Madhya Pradesh State Aid to Industries (Amendment) Bill, 1950.\nThe next of the Bill as it emerged through, the House was printed on 29th April, 1950, and Speaker signed a copy of the Printed Bill on 5th May, 1950, and certified that it had been passed by the House and forwarded it to the Governor.\nBy an endorsement on that copy of the Printed Bill the Governor reserved the Bill for the assent of the President and the President, on 22nd January, 1951, signified his assent by endorsing his signature at the foot of that copy of the Printed Bill.\nThere being a presumption of regularity attached to all official business the onus is undoubtedly on the petitioners to allege and prove that the procedure prescribed by the rules was not followed. There is no evidence on affidavit by anybody who was present at the meeting of the Assembly held on 5th April, 1950, as to be what actually happened on that date. The petitioners rely only on the absence in the Official Report of proceedings of any mention of the question being put to or carried by the Assembly.\nthe original printed Act produced before us clearly shows that on 5th May 1950, the Speaker certified that the Bill had been passed by the Assembly.\nThe question before us is whether as a matter of fact the Bill had duly passed according to the rules.\nTherefore, as a statement of a fact more reliance must be placed on the certification of the Bill than on the confirmation of the proceedings and it will not be unreasonable to hold that the omission of any mention of the question having been put to and carried by the Assembly was an accidental slip or omission.\nFurther the speeches delivered by the eleven speakers clearly indicate that the stage there was no opposition the Bill. Therefore, putting the question at the end of the third reading of the Bill would have been at best a mere formality.\nIt is after all, a matter for the Speaker to declare the result, The authentication by the Speaker on the printed Act that the Bill was passed involves such a declaration having been duly made.\nIn British Parliamentary practice the Speakers authentication is taken as conclusive (See Cries on Statute Law, 4th Ed., p. 36).\nIt appears that new rules were framed and actually came into force on 8th September 1950, New rule 148 does not reproduce sub-rule (2) of old rule 115 After the new rules came into force it was no longer the duty of the Speaker to confirm the proceedings at all. Therefore the purported confirmation of the proceedings by the Speaker on 1st October 1950, cannot be given any legal validity and the argument founded on authentication under defunct rule 115 (2) must lose all its force.\nFinally, the irregularity of procedure, if any, is expressly cured by article 212.\nI am not impressed by the argument founded on the fine distinction sought to be made between an irregularity of procedure and on omission to take a particular step in the procedure. Such an omission in my opinion is nothing more than an irregularity of procedure. In my judgment this ground of attack on the validity of the Act is not well-founded and must be rejected.\nThe procedure to be followed after a Bill is passed by the State Assembly is laid down in article 200. Under that article, the Governor can do one of three things, namely he may declare that he assents to it, in which case the Bill becomes a law, or he may declare that he with holds assent therefrom in which case the Bill falls through unless the procedure indicated in the proviso is followed\nor he may declare that he reserves the Bill for the consideration of the President in which case the president will adopt the procedure laid down in article 201.\nUnder that article the President shall declare either that he assents to the Bill in which case the Bill will become law or that he withholds assent therefrom, in which case the Bill falls through unless the procedure indicated in the proviso is followed.\nIn the latter event happening, the argument of the learned counsel for the petitioners will require that what has become a law by the assent of the President will, in order to be effective, have to be again reserved for the consideration of the President, a curious conclusion I should be loath to reach unless I am compelled to do so.\nArticle 200 does not contemplate a second reservation by the Governor.\nI do not think that what is referred to as law in article 31(3) is necessarily hat had already become a law before receiving the assent of the President.\nThe words has received his assent clearly imply and point to an accomplished fact and the clause read as a whole does not grammatically exclude a law that eventually become a law by having had received the assent to the President.\nthe word law has been used to mean what at the time of dispute purpose to be or is asserted to be a law. The language of article 31(4) also supports this interpretation.\nIn my judgment article 31(3) on its true interpretation, does not require that the Governor must first assent to the Bill passed by the Assembly so as to convert it into a law and then reserve that law for the consideration of the President.\nI have already pointed out that article 200 does not contemplate a second reservation which will be necessary if initially the Governor instead of himself assenting to the Bill had reserved it for the consideration of the President.\nIn my opinion there is no substance in the second objection which must, therefore, be over ruled.\nThe Provisions of the impugned Act have been analysed and summarised by Mahajan J. in the judgment just delivered by him and it is not necessary for me to recapitulate the same.\nSuffice it to say that for reasons stated in my judgments in the Bihar appeals I repeal these heads of objections.\nIn any event the Act cannot, for reasons stated by me in my judgment in the Bihar appeals, be questioned on the ground of absence of public purpose or of compensation.\nIt is true that section 9 of the Acts does not specially indicate when the instalments will began or what the amount of each instalments will be but the Section clearly contemplates that these details should be worked out by rules to be framed under section 91 of the Act. Further under section 10 the State Government is bound to direct payment of an interim compensation amounting to one-tenth of the estimated amount of compensation if the whole amount is not paid within a period of six months from the date of vesting of the property in the State.\nI see no improper delegation of legislative power at all. In my opinion all these heads of objections must be rejected.\nArticle 31-B is neither illustrative of nor dependant on article 31-A.\nIt does not extend to personal property which is different from personal rights. Further this article does not import any legal obligation but is an assurance only.\nTo say that the Ruler is the power of certain properties is not to say that those properties shall in no circumstances be acquired by the State.\nThe fact that his personal properties are sought to be acquired on payment of compensation clearly recognises his title just as the titles of other proprietors are recognised." + }, + "1952_60": { + "expert_1": "This is an appeal by special leave from a decision dated 27th June, 1951, of the Labour Appellate Tribunal of India at Calcutta in appeals Nos. 94 and 142 of 1950, arising out of the award of the Second Industrial Tribunal, Madras.\nOn 1st November, 1948, 859 night shift operatives of the carding and spinning department of the Carnatic Mills stopped work, some at 4 p.m., some at 4- 30 p.m. and some at 5 p.m. The stoppage ended at 8 p.m. in both the departments. By 10 p.m, the strike ended completely. The apparent cause for the strike was that the management of the Mills had expressed its inability to comply with the request of the workers to declare the forenoon of the 1st November, 1948, as a holiday for solar eclipse. \nOn the 3rd November, 1948, the management put up a notice that the stoppage of work on the 1st November amounted to an illegal strike and a break in service within the meaning of the Factories Act (XXV of 1934) and that the management had decided that the workers who had participated in the said strike would not be entitled to holidays with pay as provided by the Act. \nThis position was not accepted by the Madras Labour Union.\nBy his award the adjudicator found that there could be little doubt that the stoppage of work by the night shift workers on the night of the last November,, 1948, was a strike, that it was an illegal strike, since the textile industry is notified as a public utility industry and there could be no legal strike without a proper issue of notice in the terms prescribed by the Industrial Disputes Act. \nNo such notice had been given. In view of this finding he upheld the view of the management that the continuity of service of the workers was broken by the interruption caused by the illegal strike and that as a consequence the workers who participated in such strike were not entitled to annual holidays with pay under section 49-B (1) of the Factories Act.\nHe, however, considered that the total deprivation of leave with pay ordered by the management was a severe punishment and on the assumption that he had power to scrutinize the exercise of the discretion by the management in awarding punishment, reduced the punishment by 50 per cent and held that the workers would be deprived of only half their holidays with pay. The decision of the management was varied to this extent. The Mills as well as the-Union appealed against this decision to the Labour Appellate Tribunal. That Tribunal upheld the contention of the Mills that the adjudicator had no power to interfere with and revise the, discretion of the management exercised by it under section 49-B (1). It also upheld the contention of the Union that what happened on the night of the 1st November did not amount to a strike and did not cause any interruption in the workers service. This is what the Tribunal said- It would be absurd to hold that non-permitted absence from work even for half an hour or less in the course of a working day would be regarded as interruption of service of a workman for the purpose of the said section. \nWe are inclined to hold that the stoppage of Work for the period for about 2 to 4 hours in the circumstances of the case is not to be regarded as a strike so as to amount to a break in the continuity of service of the workman concerned. In the result the appeal of the Union on this point was allowed and it was ordered that holidays at full rates as provided for in section 49-A of the Factories Act will have to be calculated in respect of the operatives concerned on the footing that there was no break in the continuity of their service by the stoppage of work on 1st November, 1948.\nIn this appeal it was contended on behalf of the Mills that on a proper construction of section 49-B (1) of the Factories Act (XXV of 1934) the management was right in its decision that the continuity of service was broken by the interruption caused by the illegal strike and that the workers were not entitled to annual holidays with pay under the said section inasmuch as they would not have completed a period of twelve months continuous service in the factory, and that the non-permitted absence as a result of concerted refusal to work even for 2 to 4 hours in the course of a working day amounts to an illegal strike and consequently an interruption of service of a workman for the purpose of section 49-B.\nIn our judgment, this contention is well founded.\nSection 49-B provides- Every worker who has completed a period of twelve months continuous service in a factory shall be allowed, during the subsequent period of twelve months, holidays for a period of ten, or, if a child, fourteen Consecutive days, inclusive of the day or days, if any, on which he is entitled to a holiday under subsection (1) of section 35 Explanation.-A worker shall be deemed to have completed a period of twelve months continuous service in a factory notwithstanding any interruption in service during those twelve months brought about by sickness, accident or authorized leave not exceeding ninety days in the aggregate for all three or by a lookout, or by a strike which is not an illegal strike, or by intermittent periods of involuntary unemployment not exceeding thirty days It is clear that the benefit of this section is not avail- able in cases where the interruption in service is brought about by an illegal strike. Section 2 q ) of the Industrial, Disputes Act (Act XIV of 1947) defines strike as meaning- a cessation of work by a body of persons employed in any industry acting in combination, or a concerted refusal, or a refusal under a common understanding, of any number of persons who are or have been so employed to continue to work or to accept employment. \nThe adjudicator found on the evidence and circumstances of the case that there was concert and combination of the workers in stopping and refusing resume work on the night of the 1st November He observed that the fact that a very large number of leave applications was put in for various reasons pointed to the concerted action and that the appli- cation given by the workers and their representatives also indicated that they were acting in combination both in striking and refusing to go back to work on the ground that they were entitled to leave for the night shift whenever a half a days leave was granted to the day shift workers.\nHe further hold that the refusal of the workers to resume work in spite of the attempts made by the officers and their own Madras Labour Union representatives indicated that they were not as a body prepared to resume work unless their demand was conceded. In our opinion, the conclusion reached by the adjudicator was clearly right and the conclusion cannot be avoided that the workers were acting in concert. That being so, the action of the workers on the night of the 1st November clearly fell within the definition of the expression strike in section 2(q) of the Industrial Disputes Act.\nWe have not been able to appreciate the view expressed by the Appellate Tribunal that stoppage of work for a period of two to four hours and such non-permitted absence from work cannot be regarded as strike. Before the adjudicator the only point raised by the Union was that it was a spontaneous and lightning strike but it was not said by them that stoppage of work did not fall within the definition of strike as given in the Act. It cannot be disputed -that there was a cessation of work by a body of persons employed in the Mills and that they were acting in combination and their refusal to go back to work was concerted. All the necessary ingredients,. therefore, of the definition exist in the present case and the stoppage of work on 1st November, 1948, amounted to a strike. \nIt was not a case of an individual workers failure to turn up for work. It was a concerted action on the part of a large number of workers.\nThe Appellate Tribunal was thus in error in not regarding it as a strike and it had no discretion not to regard what in law was a strike as not amounting to a strike. If it cannot be denied that the stoppage of work on 1st November, 1948, amounted to a strike, then it was certainly an illegal strike because no notice had been given to the management, the Mills being a public utility industry.\nIt was contended by the President of the Union, who argued the case on behalf of the workers, that the Factories Act had no application to this case, because by a notification of the Government of Madras dated 23rd August, 1946, the Buckingham an Carnatic Mills had been exempted from the provisions of Chapter IV-A of the Act and the provisions of sections 49-A and 49-B were not therefore attracted to it and that no substantial question of law in respect to the construction of the section fell to be decided by this Court and that being so, this Court should not entertain this appeal under article 136 of the Constitution. This contention has no validity. The Mills were granted exemption from the provisions of Chapter IV-A of the Factories Act because their leave rules were in accordance with the provisions of Chapter IV-A of the Factories Act. These rules being in similar terms, the decision of the matter depends on the construction of the rules and this in- volves a substantial question of law. \nReliance was next placed on section 49-A of the Factories Act which provides that the provisions of the new Act would not operate to the prejudice of any rights which the workers were entitled to under the earlier rules and it was argued that under the leave rules of the Mills which prevailed prior to the coming into force of the Factories Act, the workers were entitled to privilege leave and there was no provision in those rules similar to the one that has been made in section 49-B or in the new rules and that the Mills had no right to deprive them of leave by reason of the strike. \nThis contention cannot be sustained because section 49-A (2) of the Factories Act has no application to the case of the Carnatic Mills in view of the notification dated 23rd August, 1946. Lastly, it was urged that the stoppage of work on 1st November, 1948, was not a concerted action -on the part of the workers and that several workers in their own individual capacity wanted leave on that date. In our opinion, in view of the facts and circumstances detailed in the adjudicators award this contention cannot be seriously considered.\nWe concur in the view of the facts taken by the adjudicator that the action of the 859 workers on the night of 1st November, 1948, fell within the definition of the word strike as given in section 2(q) of the Industrial Disputes Act and it was an illegal strike and the workers thus lost the benefit of holidays that they would have otherwise got under the rules.", + "expert_2": "The relevant facts and circumstances giving rise to the appeal are as follows On 1st November, 1948, 859 night shift operatives of the carding and spinning department of the Carnatic Mills stopped work, some at 4 p.m., some at 4- 30 p.m. and some at 5 p.m. The stoppage ended at 8 p.m. in both the departments. By 10 p.m, the strike ended completely.\nthe management had decided that the workers who had participated in the said strike would not be entitled to holidays with pay as provided by the Act.\nthat there could be little doubt that the stoppage of work by the night shift workers on the night of the last November,, 1948, was a strike, that it was an illegal strike, since the textile industry is notified as a public utility industry and there could be no legal strike without a proper issue of notice in the terms prescribed by the Industrial Disputes Act. \nNo such notice had been given\nthe total deprivation of leave with pay ordered by the management was a severe punishment and on the assumption that he had power to scrutinize the exercise of the discretion by the management in awarding punishment, reduced the punishment by 50 per cent and held that the workers would be deprived of only half their holidays with pay.\nWe are inclined to hold that the stoppage of Work for the period for about 2 to 4 hours in the circumstances of the case is not to be regarded as a strike so as to amount to a break in the continuity of service of the workman concerned.\na proper construction of section 49-B (1) of the Factories Act (XXV of 1934) the management was right in its decision that the continuity of service was broken by the interruption caused by the illegal strike and that the workers were not entitled to annual holidays with pay under the said section inasmuch as they would not have completed a period of twelve months continuous service in the factory, and that the non-permitted absence as a result of concerted refusal to work even for 2 to 4 hours in the course of a working day amounts to an illegal strike and consequently an interruption of service of a workman for the purpose of section 49-B.\nAll the necessary ingredients,. therefore, of the definition exist in the present case and the stoppage of work on 1st November, 1948, amounted to a strike. \nIt was not a case of an individual workers failure to turn up for work. It was a concerted action on the part of a large number of workers.\nIf it cannot be denied that the stoppage of work on 1st November, 1948, amounted to a strike, then it was certainly an illegal strike because no notice had been given to the management, the Mills being a public utility industry.\nthe Buckingham an Carnatic Mills had been exempted from the provisions of Chapter IV-A of the Act and the provisions of sections 49-A and 49-B were not therefore attracted to it and that no substantial question of law in respect to the construction of the section fell to be decided by this Court and that being so, this Court should not entertain this appeal under article 136 of the Constitution.\nThe Mills were granted exemption from the provisions of Chapter IV-A of the Factories Act because their leave rules were in accordance with the provisions of Chapter IV-A of the Factories Act. These rules being in similar terms, the decision of the matter depends on the construction of the rules and this in- volves a substantial question of law.\nWe concur in the view of the facts taken by the adjudicator that the action of the 859 workers on the night of 1st November, 1948, fell within the definition of the word strike as given in section 2(q) of the Industrial Disputes Act and it was an illegal strike and the workers thus lost the benefit of holidays that they would have otherwise got under the rules.", + "expert_3": "On 1st November, 1948, 859 night shift operatives of the carding and spinning department of the Carnatic Mills stopped work, some at 4 p.m., some at 4- 30 p.m. and some at 5 p.m\nThe stoppage ended at 8 p.m. in both the departments. By 10 p.m, the strike ended completely\nThe apparent cause for the strike was that the management of the Mills had expressed its inability to comply with the request of the workers to declare the forenoon of the 1st November, 1948, as a holiday for solar eclipse\nOn the 3rd November, 1948, the management put up a notice that the stoppage of work on the 1st November amounted to an illegal strike and a break in service within the meaning of the Factories Act (XXV of 1934) and that the management had decided that the workers who had participated in the said strike would not be entitled to holidays with pay as provided by the Act. \nThis position was not accepted by the Madras Labour Union.\nThe Madras Government by an order dated the 11th July, 1949, made under section 10(1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act (XIV of 1947), referred this dispute along with certain other disputes to the Industrial Tribunal, Madras\nBy his award the adjudicator found that there could be little doubt that the stoppage of work by the night shift workers on the night of the last November,, 1948, was a strike, that it was an illegal strike, since the textile industry is notified as a public utility industry and there could be no legal strike without a proper issue of notice in the terms prescribed by the Industrial Disputes Act.\nNo such notice had been given. In view of this finding he upheld the view of the management that the continuity of service of the workers was broken by the interruption caused by the illegal strike and that as a consequence the workers who participated in such strike were not entitled to annual holidays with pay under section 49-B (1) of the Factories Act\nHe, however, considered that the total deprivation of leave with pay ordered by the management was a severe punishment and on the assumption that he had power to scrutinize the exercise of the discretion by the management in awarding punishment, reduced the punishment by 50 per cent and held that the workers would be deprived of only half their holidays with pay. The decision of the management was varied to this extent\nThe Mills as well as the-Union appealed against this decision to the Labour Appellate Tribunal\nThat Tribunal upheld the contention of the Mills that the adjudicator had no power to interfere with and revise the, discretion of the management exercised by it under section 49-B (1). It also upheld the contention of the Union that what happened on the night of the 1st November did not amount to a strike and did not cause any interruption in the workers service.\nIn the result the appeal of the Union on this point was allowed and it was ordered that holidays at full rates as provided for in section 49-A of the Factories Act will have to be calculated in respect of the operatives concerned on the footing that there was no break in the continuity of their service by the stoppage of work on 1st November, 1948\nIn this appeal it was contended on behalf of the Mills that on a proper construction of section 49-B (1) of the Factories Act (XXV of 1934) the management was right in its decision that the continuity of service was broken by the interruption caused by the illegal strike and that the workers were not entitled to annual holidays with pay under the said section inasmuch as they would not have completed a period of twelve months continuous service in the factory, and that the non-permitted absence as a result of concerted refusal to work even for 2 to 4 hours in the course of a working day amounts to an illegal strike and consequently an interruption of service of a workman for the purpose of section 49-B. In our judgment, this contention is well founded\nSection 49-B provides- Every worker who has completed a period of twelve months continuous service in a factory shall be allowed, during the subsequent period of twelve months, holidays for a period of ten, or, if a child, fourteen Consecutive days, inclusive of the day or days, if any, on which he is entitled to a holiday under subsection (1) of section 35 Explanation.\n-A worker shall be deemed to have completed a period of twelve months continuous service in a factory notwithstanding any interruption in service during those twelve months brought about by sickness, accident or authorized leave not exceeding ninety days in the aggregate for all three or by a lookout, or by a strike which is not an illegal strike, or by intermittent periods of involuntary unemployment not exceeding thirty days It is clear that the benefit of this section is not avail- able in cases where the interruption in service is brought about by an illegal strike. Section 2 q ) of the Industrial, Disputes Act (Act XIV of 1947) defines strike as meaning- a cessation of work by a body of persons employed in any industry acting in combination, or a concerted refusal, or a refusal under a common understanding, of any number of persons who are or have been so employed to continue to work or to accept employment.\nThe adjudicator found on the evidence and circumstances of the case that there was concert and combination of the workers in stopping and refusing resume work on the night of the 1st November He observed that the fact that a very large number of leave applications was put in for various reasons pointed to the concerted action and that the appli- cation given by the workers and their representatives also indicated that they were acting in combination both in striking and refusing to go back to work on the ground that they were entitled to leave for the night shift whenever a half a days leave was granted to the day shift workers. \nHe further hold that the refusal of the workers to resume work in spite of the attempts made by the officers and their own Madras Labour Union representatives indicated that they were not as a body prepared to resume work unless their demand was conceded\nIn our opinion, the conclusion reached by the adjudicator was clearly right and the conclusion cannot be avoided that the workers were acting in concert.\nThat being so, the action of the workers on the night of the 1st November clearly fell within the definition of the expression strike in section 2(q) of the Industrial Disputes Act.\nWe have not been able to appreciate the view expressed by the Appellate Tribunal that stoppage of work for a period of two to four hours and such non-permitted absence from work cannot be regarded as strike. Before the adjudicator the only point raised by the Union was that it was a spontaneous and lightning strike but it was not said by them that stoppage of work did not fall within the definition of strike as given in the Act.\nIt cannot be disputed -that there was a cessation of work by a body of persons employed in the Mills and that they were acting in combination and their refusal to go back to work was concerted.\nAll the necessary ingredients,. therefore, of the definition exist in the present case and the stoppage of work on 1st November, 1948, amounted to a strike. \nIt was not a case of an individual workers failure to turn up for work.\nThe Appellate Tribunal was thus in error in not regarding it as a strike and it had no discretion not to regard what in law was a strike as not amounting to a strike. If it cannot be denied that the stoppage of work on 1st November, 1948, amounted to a strike, then it was certainly an illegal strike because no notice had been given to the management, the Mills being a public utility industry\nThe Mills were granted exemption from the provisions of Chapter IV-A of the Factories Act because their leave rules were in accordance with the provisions of Chapter IV-A of the Factories Act\nThese rules being in similar terms, the decision of the matter depends on the construction of the rules and this in- volves a substantial question of law.\nsection 49-A (2) of the Factories Act has no application to the case of the Carnatic Mills in view of the notification dated 23rd August, 1946\nit was urged that the stoppage of work on 1st November, 1948, was not a concerted action -on the part of the workers and that several workers in their own individual capacity wanted leave on that date. In our opinion, in view of the facts and circumstances detailed in the adjudicators award this contention cannot be seriously considered\nWe concur in the view of the facts taken by the adjudicator that the action of the 859 workers on the night of 1st November, 1948, fell within the definition of the word strike as given in section 2(q) of the Industrial Disputes Act and it was an illegal strike and the workers thus lost the benefit of holidays that they would have otherwise got under the rules.", + "expert_4": "-This is an appeal by special leave from a decision dated 27th June, 1951, of the Labour Appellate Tribunal of India at Calcutta in appeals Nos. 94 and 142 of 1950, arising out of the award of the Second Industrial Tribunal, Madras.\nThe relevant facts and circumstances giving rise to the appeal are as follows On 1st November, 1948, 859 night shift operatives of the carding and spinning department of the Carnatic Mills stopped work, some at 4 p.m., some at 4- 30 p.m. and some at 5 p.m.\nThe stoppage ended at 8 p.m. in both the departments. By 10 p.m, the strike ended completely.\nThe apparent cause for the strike was that the management of the Mills had expressed its inability to comply with the request of the workers to declare the forenoon of the 1st November, 1948, as a holiday for solar eclipse.\nOn the 3rd November, 1948, the management put up a notice that the stoppage of work on the 1st November amounted to an illegal strike and a break in service within the meaning of the Factories Act (XXV of 1934) and that the management had decided that the workers who had participated in the said strike would not be entitled to holidays with pay as provided by the Act.\nThis position was not accepted by the Madras Labour Union.\nThe Madras Government by an order dated the 11th July, 1949, made under section 10(1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act (XIV of 1947), referred this dispute along with certain other disputes to the Industrial Tribunal, Madras.\nThe adjudicator gave the award which was published in the Gazette on 12th October, 1950.\nBy his award the adjudicator found that there could be little doubt that the stoppage of work by the night shift workers on the night of the last November,, 1948, was a strike, that it was an illegal strike, since the textile industry is notified as a public utility industry and there could be no legal strike without a proper issue of notice in the terms prescribed by the Industrial Disputes Act.\nNo such notice had been given.\nIn view of this finding he upheld the view of the management that the continuity of service of the workers was broken by the interruption caused by the illegal strike and that as a consequence the workers who participated in such strike were not entitled to annual holidays with pay under section 49-B (1) of the Factories Act.\nHe, however, considered that the total deprivation of leave with pay ordered by the management was a severe punishment and on the assumption that he had power to scrutinize the exercise of the discretion by the management in awarding punishment, reduced the punishment by 50 per cent and held that the workers would be deprived of only half their holidays with pay.\nThe decision of the management was varied to this extent.\nThe Mills as well as the-Union appealed against this decision to the Labour Appellate Tribunal.\nThat Tribunal upheld the contention of the Mills that the adjudicator had no power to interfere with and revise the, discretion of the management exercised by it under section 49-B (1).\nIt also upheld the contention of the Union that what happened on the night of the 1st November did not amount to a strike and did not cause any interruption in the workers service.\nThis is what the Tribunal said- It would be absurd to hold that non-permitted absence from work even for half an hour or less in the course of a working day would be regarded as interruption of service of a workman for the purpose of the said section.\nWe are inclined to hold that the stoppage of Work for the period for about 2 to 4 hours in the circumstances of the case is not to be regarded as a strike so as to amount to a break in the continuity of service of the workman concerned.\nIn the result the appeal of the Union on this point was allowed and it was ordered that holidays at full rates as provided for in section 49-A of the Factories Act will have to be calculated in respect of the operatives concerned on the footing that there was no break in the continuity of their service by the stoppage of work on 1st November, 1948.\nIn this appeal it was contended on behalf of the Mills that on a proper construction of section 49-B (1) of the Factories Act (XXV of 1934) the management was right in its decision that the continuity of service was broken by the interruption caused by the illegal strike and that the workers were not entitled to annual holidays with pay under the said section inasmuch as they would not have completed a period of twelve months continuous service in the factory, and that the non-permitted absence as a result of concerted refusal to work even for 2 to 4 hours in the course of a working day amounts to an illegal strike and consequently an interruption of service of a workman for the purpose of section 49-B.\nIn our judgment, this contention is well founded.\nSection 49-B provides- Every worker who has completed a period of twelve months continuous service in a factory shall be allowed, during the subsequent period of twelve months, holidays for a period of ten, or, if a child, fourteen Consecutive days, inclusive of the day or days, if any, on which he is entitled to a holiday under subsection (1) of section 35 Explanation.\nA worker shall be deemed to have completed a period of twelve months continuous service in a factory notwithstanding any interruption in service during those twelve months brought about by sickness, accident or authorized leave not exceeding ninety days in the aggregate for all three or by a lookout, or by a strike which is not an illegal strike, or by intermittent periods of involuntary unemployment not exceeding thirty days It is clear that the benefit of this section is not avail- able in cases where the interruption in service is brought about by an illegal strike.\nSection 2 q ) of the Industrial, Disputes Act (Act XIV of 1947) defines strike as meaning- a cessation of work by a body of persons employed in any industry acting in combination, or a concerted refusal, or a refusal under a common understanding, of any number of persons who are or have been so employed to continue to work or to accept employment.\nThe adjudicator found on the evidence and circumstances of the case that there was concert and combination of the workers in stopping and refusing resume work on the night of the 1st November He observed that the fact that a very large number of leave applications was put in for various reasons pointed to the concerted action and that the appli- cation given by the workers and their representatives also indicated that they were acting in combination both in striking and refusing to go back to work on the ground that they were entitled to leave for the night shift whenever a half a days leave was granted to the day shift workers.\nHe further hold that the refusal of the workers to resume work in spite of the attempts made by the officers and their own Madras Labour Union representatives indicated that they were not as a body prepared to resume work unless their demand was conceded.\nIn our opinion, the conclusion reached by the adjudicator was clearly right and the conclusion cannot be avoided that the workers were acting in concert.\nThat being so, the action of the workers on the night of the 1st November clearly fell within the definition of the expression strike in section 2(q) of the Industrial Disputes Act.\nWe have not been able to appreciate the view expressed by the Appellate Tribunal that stoppage of work for a period of two to four hours and such non-permitted absence from work cannot be regarded as strike.\nBefore the adjudicator the only point raised by the Union was that it was a spontaneous and lightning strike but it was not said by them that stoppage of work did not fall within the definition of strike as given in the Act.\nIt cannot be disputed -that there was a cessation of work by a body of persons employed in the Mills and that they were acting in combination and their refusal to go back to work was concerted.\nAll the necessary ingredients,. therefore, of the definition exist in the present case and the stoppage of work on 1st November, 1948, amounted to a strike.\nIt was not a case of an individual workers failure to turn up for work.\nIt was a concerted action on the part of a large number of workers.\nThe Appellate Tribunal was thus in error in not regarding it as a strike and it had no discretion not to regard what in law was a strike as not amounting to a strike.\nIf it cannot be denied that the stoppage of work on 1st November, 1948, amounted to a strike, then it was certainly an illegal strike because no notice had been given to the management, the Mills being a public utility industry.\nIt was contended by the President of the Union, who argued the case on behalf of the workers, that the Factories Act had no application to this case, because by a notification of the Government of Madras dated 23rd August, 1946, the Buckingham an Carnatic Mills had been exempted from the provisions of Chapter IV-A of the Act and the provisions of sections 49-A and 49-B were not therefore attracted to it and that no substantial question of law in respect to the construction of the section fell to be decided by this Court and that being so, this Court should not entertain this appeal under article 136 of the Constitution.\nThis contention has no validity.\nThe Mills were granted exemption from the provisions of Chapter IV-A of the Factories Act because their leave rules were in accordance with the provisions of Chapter IV-A of the Factories Act.\nThese rules being in similar terms, the decision of the matter depends on the construction of the rules and this in- volves a substantial question of law.\nReliance was next placed on section 49-A of the Factories Act which provides that the provisions of the new Act would not operate to the prejudice of any rights which the workers were entitled to under the earlier rules and it was argued that under the leave rules of the Mills which prevailed prior to the coming into force of the Factories Act, the workers were entitled to privilege leave and there was no provision in those rules similar to the one that has been made in section 49-B or in the new rules and that the Mills had no right to deprive them of leave by reason of the strike.\nThis contention cannot be sustained because section 49-A (2) of the Factories Act has no application to the case of the Carnatic Mills in view of the notification dated 23rd August, 1946.\nLastly, it was urged that the stoppage of work on 1st November, 1948, was not a concerted action -on the part of the workers and that several workers in their own individual capacity wanted leave on that date.\nIn our opinion, in view of the facts and circumstances detailed in the adjudicators award this contention cannot be seriously considered.\nWe concur in the view of the facts taken by the adjudicator that the action of the 859 workers on the night of 1st November, 1948, fell within the definition of the word strike as given in section 2(q) of the Industrial Disputes Act and it was an illegal strike and the workers thus lost the benefit of holidays that they would have otherwise got under the rules.\nThe learned counsel for the appellant undertook on behalf of the management ex gratia that it would condone the default of the workers on 1st November, 1948, and the cessation of work on that night would not be treated as depriving them of the holidays under the rules and we appreciate -the spirit in which this undertaking was given and hope that the workers would also take it in that spirit.", + "expert_5": "Section 49-B provides- Every worker who has completed a period of twelve months continuous service in a factory shall be allowed, during the subsequent period of twelve months, holidays for a period of ten, or, if a child, fourteen Consecutive days, inclusive of the day or days, if any, on which he is entitled to a holiday under subsection (1) of section 35\nA worker shall be deemed to have completed a period of twelve months continuous service in a factory notwithstanding any interruption in service during those twelve months brought about by sickness, accident or authorized leave not exceeding ninety days in the aggregate for all three or by a lookout, or by a strike which is not an illegal strike, or by intermittent periods of involuntary unemployment not exceeding thirty days\nor by a strike which is not an illegal strike\nIt is clear that the benefit of this section is not avail- able in cases where the interruption in service is brought about by an illegal strike.\nSection 2 q ) of the Industrial, Disputes Act (Act XIV of 1947) defines strike as meaning- a cessation of work by a body of persons employed in any industry acting in combination, or a concerted refusal, or a refusal under a common understanding, of any number of persons who are or have been so employed to continue to work or to accept employment.\nacting in combination, or a concerted refusal, or a refusal under a common understanding\nThe adjudicator found on the evidence and circumstances of the case that there was concert and combination of the workers in stopping and refusing resume work on the night of the 1st November\na very large number of leave applications was put in for various reasons pointed to the concerted action and that the appli- cation given by the workers and their representatives also indicated that they were acting in combination both in striking and refusing to go back to work on the ground that they were entitled to leave for the night shift whenever a half a days leave was granted to the day shift workers.\nHe further hold that the refusal of the workers to resume work in spite of the attempts made by the officers and their own Madras Labour Union representatives indicated that they were not as a body prepared to resume work unless their demand was conceded.\nIn our opinion, the conclusion reached by the adjudicator was clearly right and the conclusion cannot be avoided that the workers were acting in concert. That being so, the action of the workers on the night of the 1st November clearly fell within the definition of the expression strike in section 2(q) of the Industrial Disputes Act.\nit was not said by them that stoppage of work did not fall within the definition of strike as given in the Act.\nIt cannot be disputed -that there was a cessation of work by a body of persons employed in the Mills and that they were acting in combination and their refusal to go back to work was concerted.\nIt was not a case of an individual workers failure to turn up for work. It was a concerted action on the part of a large number of workers.\nIf it cannot be denied that the stoppage of work on 1st November, 1948, amounted to a strike, then it was certainly an illegal strike because no notice had been given to the management, the Mills being a public utility industry.\nThe Mills were granted exemption from the provisions of Chapter IV-A of the Factories Act because their leave rules were in accordance with the provisions of Chapter IV-A of the Factories Act. These rules being in similar terms, the decision of the matter depends on the construction of the rules and this in- volves a substantial question of law.\nsection 49-A (2) of the Factories Act has no application to the case of the Carnatic Mills in view of the notification dated 23rd August, 1946.\nWe concur in the view of the facts taken by the adjudicator that the action of the 859 workers on the night of 1st November, 1948, fell within the definition of the word strike as given in section 2(q) of the Industrial Disputes Act and it was an illegal strike and the workers thus lost the benefit of holidays that they would have otherwise got under the rules." + }, + "1952_75": { + "expert_1": "The only question is whether the suit is barred by section 4 (a) of Bombay Act X of 1876 (Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act).\nEvery Saranjam shall be held as a life estate. It shall be formally resumed on the death of the holder and in cases in which it is capable of further continuance it shall be made over to the next holder as a fresh grant from Government unencumbered by any debts, or charges, save such as may be specially imposed by Government itself.\nThe defendants were evidently aggrieved by this, for they filed Suit No. 23 of 1934 against the present plaintiff and the Secretary of State for India in Council praying inter alia that the properties, in that suit, viz., the villages allotted to their shares, were their independent and private properties and in case they were held to be Saranjam properties, they be declared as independent Saranjams, separate, and distinct from the one held by the present plaintiff. This suit was withdrawn with liberty to bring a fresh suit on the same cause of action against the present plaintiff but not against the Secretary of State for India in Council. According to defendants I and 2, this was pursuant to an arrangement between the Government and themselves that Government would issue a fresh Resolution in terms of the earlier Resolution dated the 17th of March, 1891. This was done.\nThe first Court dismissed the plaintiffs claim on the merits holding that Government had the right to amend its Resolution in the way it did. The lower appellate Court also dismissed the suit on three grounds (1) that the two previous decisions of 1868 and 1908 operate as res judicata, (2) that the impugned Resolution is intra vires and (3) that section 4 (a) and (d) of the Revenue Jurisdiction Act bars the jurisdiction of the Court. In second appeal the High Court only considered the question of jurisdiction and, agreeing, with the lower appellate Court on the point, dismissed the appeal but it granted the plaintiff leave no appeal to this Court.\nThe only question we have to consider is the one of jurisdiction. Section 4 of the Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act, 1876 (Bombay Act X of 1876), runs - \n Subject to the exceptions hereinafter appearing, no Civil Court shall exercise jurisdiction as to - \n (a) claims against the Crown relating to lands held as Saranjam \n It was strenuously contended that this is not a claim against the Crown but one against the first and second defendants. That in my opinion is an idle contention in view of paragraphs 9 and 12 of the plaint and reliefs (a) and (d). In any event, Mr. Somayya was asked whether he would strike out the third defendant and those portions of the plaint which sought relief against it. He said he was not prepared to do so. I cannot see how a plaintiff can insist on retaining a person against whom he claims no relief as a party. I am clear that this is a suit against the Crown within the meaning of section 4 (a).\nThe only question we have to consider is the one of jurisdiction. Section 4 of the Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act, 1876 (Bombay Act X of 1876), runs - \n Subject to the exceptions hereinafter appearing, no Civil Court shall exercise jurisdiction as to - \n (a) claims against the Crown relating to lands held as Saranjam \n It was strenuously contended that this is not a claim against the Crown but one against the first and second defendants. That in my opinion is an idle contention in view of paragraphs 9 and 12 of the plaint and reliefs (a) and (d).\nThe next question is whether, assuming that to be the case, it is also one relating to lands held as Saranjam. So far as the reliefs sought against Government are concerned, that is clearly the case.\nIn my opinion this is not a suit in which the rights claimed against the other defendants can be divorced from the claim against Government and considered separately.\nIn any event, if the claim against Government is to be ignored it can only be on the basis that its orders cannot be challenged and if the orders stand it is evident that the plaintiff can have no hope of success because both sides hold their respective properties on the basis of those orders.\nIn any event, if the claim against Government is to be ignored it can only be on the basis that its orders cannot be challenged and if the orders stand it is evident that the plaintiff can have no hope of success because both sides hold their respective properties on the basis of those orders.\nIt was next contended, on the strength of a decision of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council reported in Province of Bombay v. Hormusji Manekji (74 I.A. 103) that the courts have jurisdiction to decide whether Government acted in excess of its powers and that that question must be decided first. In my opinion, this decision does not apply here.\nBut the position here is different. We are concerned here with section 4 (a) under that no question about an authorised act of Government arises. The section is general and bars all claims against the Crown relating to lands held as Saranjam. That is to say, even if the Government act is relation to such lands was ultra vires, a claim impugning the validity of such an act would fall within the scope of the exclusion in clause (a) provided it relates to such land.", + "expert_2": "The only question is whether the suit is barred by section 4 (a) of Bombay Act X of 1876 (Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act).\nThey further declared that Bhujangrao I was the head of the family and as such was entitled to a special assignment which was not to exceed a quarter share, for the expenses and duties which might devolve on him by virtue of his position, and that after this had been set aside each of the three brothers was entitled to an equal one-third share in the landed property in India.\nOn the 26th of April, 1882, they passed a Resolution embodying the following decision \n The adoption was to be recognised and the adapted son was to occupy the same position as his adoptive father, that is to say, he was to get one-third of the property plus the assignment given to him as head of the family. Malojirao who had already taken his share of the estate was to continue in possession. Yeshwantrao (alias Annasaheb) was given the option of remaining joint with the adopted boy or separating. Finally, the Resolution concluded - \n The two brothers will hold their respective shares as their private property in virtue of the decree of the High Court and the Jahagir will henceforth be restricted to the portion awarded by the High Court to Bhujangrao which the adopted son will now inherit.\nKrishnabai who had been allowed by Government to adopt Daulatrao II, asked that her husbands one-third share in the estate be also treated as private property in the same way as the shares of the other brothers. This prayer was refused and Government stated \n It should be plainly under that Government allow the adoption to be made only in consideration of Bhujangrao one share as well as the portion assigned to him as head of the family being continued to the adopted son as indivisible Jahagir Estate descending in the line of male heirs in the order of primogeniture and subject to no terms whatsoever as to the enjoyment of the same by Krishnabai during her lifetime. The position was re-examined by Government in 1891 and its decision was embodied in the following resolution dated the 17th of March, 1891 \n It appears to Government that the whole Gajendragad Estate is Saranjam continuable as here in the fullest sense of the word as interpreted by the Court of Directors in paragraph 9 of their Despatch No. 27 dated 12th December, 1855. It is continuable to all male legitimate descendants of the holder at the time of the British conquest and should Government ever sanction an adoption the terms of sanction would be those applicable to Saranjamdars.\nA Saranjam which was decided to be hereditarily continuable shall ordinarily descend to the eldest male representative, in the order of primogeniture, of the senior branch of the family descended from the first British Grantee or any of his brothers who were undivided in interest. But Government reserve to themselves their rights for sufficient reason to direct the continuance of the Saranjam to any other member of the said family, or as an act of grace, to a person adopted into the same family with the sanction of Government.\nGovernment passed the following Resolution - \n Resolution-After careful consideration the Governor-in-Council is pleased to confirm the decision in Government, Resolution (Political Department) No. 1769 dated the 17th of March, 1891, and to declare that the whole of the Gajendragad Estate shall be continuable as an inalienable and impartible Saranjam on the conditions stated in the said Resolution. Having regard, however, to the manner in which different portions of the estate have been held by different branches of the family, the Governor-in-Council, in modification of the orders contained in Government esolution No. 8969 dated the 7th June, 1932, is pleased to direct that the portions of the said estate held by Sardar Bhujangrao Daulatrao Ghorpade, Daulatrao Malojirao Ghorpade and Bhujangrao Yeshwantrao Ghorpade, respectively, shall henceforth be entered in the Revenue Records as de facto shares in the said estate held by the said persons as representatives, respectively, of three branches of the Ghorpade family.\nEach of the said de facto shares shall be continuable hereditarily as such as if it were a separate Saranjam estate in accordance with the rules made for the continuance of Saranjams by the Governor-in-Council in exercise of the powers referred to in the rules framed under the Bombay Rent Free Estates Act, 1852, and section 2 (3) of the Bombay Summary Settlement Act (VII of 1863) and such special orders as the Governor-in-Council may make in regard to the Gajendragad Estate as a whole or in regard to the said share. The recognition of the aforesaid shares and their entry in the Revenue Records as separate shares shall not be deemed to amount to a recognition of the estate of Gajendragad as in any manner partible or alienable and shall not in any way affect the right of Government to treat the said estate as an entire impartible and inalienable Saranjam estate\nThe first and second defendants are the present representatives of the other branches of the family and the third defendant is the Province of Bombay (now the State of Bombay). The plaint states - \n Government can have an jurisdiction to deprive the plaintiff at any rate during his lifetime of the full benefit of all the rights and privileges appertaining to the holder of a Saranjam.\nThe Order of Government of the 8th February, 1930 is, therefore, ultra vires and in no way binding on the present plaintiff \n Defendants 1 and 2, therefore, are not entitled to any right or privileges claimable by the holder of a Saranjam which according to the G.\nThat in consequence of his position of a sole Saranjamdar the plaintiff alone at any rate during his lifetime has the sole right to the rights and privileges appertaining to the post of a sole Saranjamdar to wit, to be consulted in the appointment of the village officers in all the villages appertaining to the Saranjam estate, but assigned to defendants 1 and 2 for potgi \n Defendants 1 and 2 be restrained from doing any acts or taking any steps in contravention of the aforesaid right of the plaintiff.\nSection 4 of the Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act, 1876 (Bombay Act X of 1876), runs - \n Subject to the exceptions hereinafter appearing, no Civil Court shall exercise jurisdiction as to - \n (a) claims against the Crown relating to lands held as Saranjam \n It was strenuously contended that this is not a claim against the Crown but one against the first and second defendants.\nI am clear that this is a suit against the Crown within the meaning of section 4 (a).\nParagraph 9 of the plaint challenges Governments jurisdiction to deprive the plaintiff of the full benefit of all rights and privileges appertaining to the holder of a Saranjam. these rights cannot exist apart from the lands which form part of the Saranjam estate and the implication of the prayer is that Government has, for example, no right to resume the Saranjam either under Rule V on the death of the last Saranjamdar or under Rule IX during his lifetime.\nThese revenues can only come out of the land. Relief (d) in the prayer clause seeks a declaration that Government has to right to change Resolution No. 8969 dated the 7th of June, 1932. That Resolution directly relates to the land because it directs that the Gajendragad Saranjam he resumed and the Collector is directed to take steps to place the Saranjamdar in possession of the village of the Saranjam estate etc. It is impossible to contend that this is not a claim relating to lands held as Saranjam.\nOne of those rights, as we have been from Rules VII and IX, is to take the revenues of the entire estate in order that he might fulfil his obligation regarding the payment of maintenance to certain members of the family and if the defendants claim to hold their lands under the orders of Government and the plaintiff insists on retaining Government as a party in order that it may be bound by the decree he wants against the other defendants it is obvious that his claim against these defendants cannot be separated from his claim against the Government. In any event, if the claim against Government is to be ignored it can only be on the basis that its orders cannot be challenged and if the orders stand it is evident that the plaintiff can have no hope of success because both sides hold their respective properties on the basis of those orders.\nMr. Gumaste, who appears for the appellant, says that his claim is not a claim against the Government but in that case be ought to strike out the Government. He is not prepared to strike out the Government because if he does they will not be bound by these proceedings and will follow the decision of their revenue tribunals. Therefore, he wants to make the Government a party in order that they may be bound.\nif they remain a party, it seems to me that there is a claim against them relating to property appertaining to the office of an hereditary officer, although no doubt it is quite true that the appellant does not desire to get any order against the Government as to the way in which the property should be dealt with or anything of the sort, and he only wants a declaration as to his title which will bind Government. They held that the jurisdiction of the courts was ousted.\nWe are concerned here with section 4 (a) under that no question about an authorised act of Government arises. The section is general and bars all claims against the Crown relating to lands held as Saranjam. That is to say, even if the Government act is relation to such lands was ultra vires, a claim impugning the validity of such an act would fall within the scope of the exclusion in clause (a) provided it relates to such land.", + "expert_3": "The plaintiff appeals. The suit relates to a Saranjam estate in the State of Bombay.\nThe plaintiff claims to be the sole Saranjamdar and seeks certain declarations and other reliefs appropriate to such a claim\nThe first and second defendants are members of the plaintiffs family while the third defendant is the State of Bombay (Province of Bombay at the date of the suit)\nThe only question is whether the suit is barred by section 4 (a) of Bombay Act X of 1876 (Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act).\nThe following genealogical tree will show the relationship between the parties Bhujangrao Appasaheb (British grantee) \n Daulatrao I (died 24-7-1864) ----------------------------------------------------------------- \n Bhujangrao I Malojirao Yeshwantrao alias (died 1881) Annasaheb \n (widow) Krishnabai Daulatrao III Bhujangrao II Daulatrao II (Def. 1) (Def. 2) (died 8-5-1931) \n Bhujangrao III\nA common ancestor of the present parties was given the Gajendragad estate as a Saranjam some time before the advent of the British.\nWhen they arrived on the scene they decided, as far as possible, to continue such Saranjams, jagirs and inams as had been granted by the earlier rulers\naccordingly they framed rules under Schedule B. Rule 10 of Bombay Act XI of 1852 (The Bombay Rent Free Estates Act 1852) to regulate the mode of recognition and the succession and conditions of tenure to Saranjams, which are analogous to jagirs.\nIn compliance with this, the common ancestor shown at the head of the genealogical tree set out above was recognised by the British Government as the Saranjamdar of the Gajendragad estate.\nHe may for convenience be termed the British Grantee\nThe Register Ex. P-53 shows that the estate consisted of villages\nWe do not know the date of the British recognition but the nature of the tenure is described as follows - \n Continuable to all male legitimate descendants of the holder at the time of British conquest, viz., Bhujangrao Appasaheb, the first British Grantee, son of Bahirojirao Ghorpade\nOn the death of the British Grantee (Bhujangrao Appasaheb) he was succeeded by his son Daulatrao I who dies on the 24th of July, 1864. This Daulatrao I left three sons, bhujangrao I, Yeshwantrao and Malojirao\nIn the year 1866 Bhujangrao I and his brother Yeshwantrao alias Annasaheb sued Malojirao for possession of this Saranjam\nThey further declared that Bhujangrao I was the head of the family and as such was entitled to a special assignment which was not to exceed a quarter share, for the expenses and duties which might devolve on him by virtue of his position, and that after this had been set aside each of the three brothers was entitled to an equal one-third share in the landed property in India.\nAs a consequence a division of the property was effected. Malojirao separated himself from his brothers and was allotted seven villages. The other two brothers continued joint and took the remainder. But this was only with respect to property situate in British India\nThe parties also had property in the State of Kolhapur\nThat was left undivided\nBhujangrao I died in 1881 and his younger brother Yeshwantrao (alias Annasaheb) claimed to succeed as the sole their. The Political Department of the Government of India refused to recognise this claim and permitted Bhujangrao Is widow Krishnabai to adopt a boy from the family and recognised him as the heir in respect of that portion of the estate which lay within the Principality of Kolhapur.\nThis was on the 3rd of February 1882\nThe Bombay Government followed a similar course regarding the property in British India. On the 26th of April, 1882, they passed a Resolution embodying the following decision \n The adoption was to be recognised and the adapted son was to occupy the same position as his adoptive father, that is to say, he was to get one-third of the property plus the assignment given to him as head of the family\nMalojirao who had already taken his share of the estate was to continue in possession.\nYeshwantrao (alias Annasaheb) was given the option of remaining joint with the adopted boy or separating. Finally, the Resolution concluded - \n The two brothers will hold their respective shares as their private property in virtue of the decree of the High Court and the Jahagir will henceforth be restricted to the portion awarded by the High Court to Bhujangrao which the adopted son will now inherit\nIt should however be clearly understood that the decision of the High Court in not to be held as a precedent and that no partition of the Jahagir Estate to be continued to the adopted son will ever be allowed\nKrishnabai who had been allowed by Government to adopt Daulatrao II, asked that her husbands one-third share in the estate be also treated as private property in the same way as the shares of the other brothers.\nThis prayer was refused and Government stated \n It should be plainly under that Government allow the adoption to be made only in consideration of Bhujangrao one share as well as the portion assigned to him as head of the family being continued to the adopted son as indivisible Jahagir Estate descending in the line of male heirs in the order of primogeniture and subject to no terms whatsoever as to the enjoyment of the same by Krishnabai during her lifetime. The position was re-examined by Government in 1891 and its decision was embodied in the following resolution dated the 17th of March, 1891 \n It appears to Government that the whole Gajendragad Estate is Saranjam continuable as here in the fullest sense of the word as interpreted by the Court of Directors in paragraph 9 of their Despatch No. 27 dated 12th December, 1855.\nIt is continuable to all male legitimate descendants of the holder at the time of the British conquest and should Government ever sanction an adoption the terms of sanction would be those applicable to Saranjamdars\nThe property should be dealt with like other Saranjams in the Political Department. In the year 1901 the adopted son Daulatrao II sued Yashwantraos son Bhujangrao II for partition.\nThe High Courts judgment dated the 12th of March, 1908, makes it clear that as Government was not a party to that litigation its rights against either or both of the parties were not affected. But as between the parties inter se they were bound by the previous decision and so the adopted sun was entitled to partition and separate possession of such properties as might fall to his share. After this decision was given the two partitioned the property between themselves amicably\nIn or about the year 1930 a Record of Rights was introduced in fourteen of the villages in the Gajendragad Jahagir and a dispute arise again between the three branches of the family. The District Deputy Collector, after inspecting the records, found that the name of the Khatedar Saranjamdar alone has found place in the village Inam register, in the Saranjam list and the land alienation register. while in the other village records the various members of the family were entered according to the actual wahivat or enjoyment.\nAfter due consideration he thought that the interest of Government and the Saranjamdar would be sufficiently safeguarded by allowing the same position to continue\nHe ordered the entries to be made accordingly. The order also discloses that the matter had been referred to the Legal Remembrancer to the Bombay Government\nIn the meanwhile, on the 5th of May, 1898, a set of Rules framed under Schedule B, Rule 10, of the Bombay Rent Free Estates Act of 1852 were drawn up and published in the Bombay Gazette.\nThe portions applicable here were as follows - \n Saranjams shall ordinarily be continued in accordance with the decision already passed by Government in each case\nA Saranjam which was decided to be hereditarily continuable shall ordinarily descend to the eldest male representative, in the order of primogeniture, of the senior branch of the family descended from the first British Grantee or any of his brothers who were undivided in interest\nBut Government reserve to themselves their rights for sufficient reason to direct the continuance of the Saranjam to any other member of the said family, or as an act of grace, to a person adopted into the same family with the sanction of Government. Every Saranjam shall be held as a life estate\nIt shall be formally resumed on the death of the holder and in cases in which it is capable of further continuance it shall be made over to the next holder as a fresh grant from Government unencumbered by any debts, or charges, save such as may be specially imposed by Government itself.\nAfter the District Deputy Collectors orders were passed on the 20th of May, 1930, Daulatrao II died on the 8th of May, 1931, and the matter was again taken up by Government. This time it passed the following Resolution on the 7th of June, 1932. The Resolution was headed Resumption and regrant of the Gajendragad Saranjam standing at No. 91 of the Saranjam List.\nIt reads - \n Resolution - The Governor-in-Council is pleased to direct that the Gajendragad Saranjam should be formally resumed and regranted to Bhujangrao Daulatrao Ghorpade eldest sun of the deceased Saranjamdar Sardar Daulatrao Bhujangrao Ghorpade and that it should be entered in his sole name in the accounts of the Collector of Dharwar with effect from the date of the death of the last holder. The Collector should take steps to place the Saranjamdar in possession of the villages of the Saranjam estate which were in possession of the deceased Saranjamdar.\nThe Bhujangrao mentioned in the Resolution is the plaintiff who is shown as Bhujangrao III in the genealogical tree. The defendants were evidently aggrieved by this, for they filed Suit No. 23 of 1934 against the present plaintiff and the Secretary of State for India in Council praying inter alia that the properties, in that suit, viz., the villages allotted to their shares, were their independent and private properties and in case they were held to be Saranjam properties, they be declared as independent Saranjams, separate, and distinct from the one held by the present plaintiff\nThis suit was withdrawn with liberty to bring a fresh suit on the same cause of action against the present plaintiff but not against the Secretary of State for India in Council. According to defendants I and 2, this was pursuant to an arrangement between the Government and themselves that Government would issue a fresh Resolution in terms of the earlier Resolution dated the 17th of March, 1891. This was done.\nOn the 25th of February, 1936, Government passed the following Resolution - \n Resolution-After careful consideration the Governor-in-Council is pleased to confirm the decision in Government, Resolution (Political Department) No. 1769 dated the 17th of March, 1891, and to declare that the whole of the Gajendragad Estate shall be continuable as an inalienable and impartible Saranjam on the conditions stated in the said Resolution. Having regard, however, to the manner in which different portions of the estate have been held by different branches of the family, the Governor-in-Council, in modification of the orders contained in Government esolution No. 8969 dated the 7th June, 1932, is pleased to direct that the portions of the said estate held by Sardar Bhujangrao Daulatrao Ghorpade, Daulatrao Malojirao Ghorpade and Bhujangrao Yeshwantrao Ghorpade, respectively, shall henceforth be entered in the Revenue Records as de facto shares in the said estate held by the said persons as representatives, respectively, of three branches of the Ghorpade family.\nEach of the said de facto shares shall be continuable hereditarily as such as if it were a separate Saranjam estate in accordance with the rules made for the continuance of Saranjams by the Governor-in-Council in exercise of the powers referred to in the rules framed under the Bombay Rent Free Estates Act, 1852, and section 2 (3) of the Bombay Summary Settlement Act (VII of 1863) and such special orders as the Governor-in-Council may make in regard to the Gajendragad Estate as a whole or in regard to the said share\nThe recognition of the aforesaid shares and their entry in the Revenue Records as separate shares shall not be deemed to amount to a recognition of the estate of Gajendragad as in any manner partible or alienable and shall not in any way affect the right of Government to treat the said estate as an entire impartible and inalienable Saranjam estate. The Governor-in-Council further directs that the aforesaid shares shall in no case be capable of sub-division and shall not in any way be alienated or encumbered except in accordance with the rules and orders referred to above \n The present suit is an attack on the action of Government in passing this Resolution.\nThe plaint states - \n Government can have an jurisdiction to deprive the plaintiff at any rate during his lifetime of the full benefit of all the rights and privileges appertaining to the holder of a Saranjam. The Order of Government of the 8th February, 1930 is, therefore, ultra vires and in no way binding on the present plaintiff \n Defendants 1 and 2, therefore, are not entitled to any right or privileges claimable by the holder of a Saranjam which according to the G.\nK. is continuable as an inalienable and impartible Saranjam, such as for example in the matter of appointment of the village officers in any of the 27 villages appertaining to the Gajendragad Saranjam\nThe first Court dismissed the plaintiffs claim on the merits holding that Government had the right to amend its Resolution in the way it did.\nThe lower appellate Court also dismissed the suit on three grounds (1) that the two previous decisions of 1868 and 1908 operate as res judicata, (2) that the impugned Resolution is intra vires and (3) that section 4 (a) and (d) of the Revenue Jurisdiction Act bars the jurisdiction of the Court. In second appeal the High Court only considered the question of jurisdiction and, agreeing, with the lower appellate Court on the point, dismissed the appeal but it granted the plaintiff leave no appeal to this Court.\nThe only question we have to consider is the one of jurisdiction. Section 4 of the Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act, 1876 (Bombay Act X of 1876), runs - \n Subject to the exceptions hereinafter appearing, no Civil Court shall exercise jurisdiction as to - \n (a) claims against the Crown relating to lands held as Saranjam \n It was strenuously contended that this is not a claim against the Crown but one against the first and second defendants. That in my opinion is an idle contention in view of paragraphs 9 and 12 of the plaint and reliefs (a) and (d).\nI cannot see how a plaintiff can insist on retaining a person against whom he claims no relief as a party. I am clear that this is a suit against the Crown within the meaning of section 4 (a)\nThe next question is whether, assuming that to be the case, it is also one relating to lands held as Saranjam. So far as the reliefs sought against Government are concerned, that is clearly the case\nParagraph 9 of the plaint challenges Governments jurisdiction to deprive the plaintiff of the full benefit of all rights and privileges appertaining to the holder of a Saranjam. these rights cannot exist apart from the lands which form part of the Saranjam estate and the implication of the prayer is that Government has, for example, no right to resume the Saranjam either under Rule V on the death of the last Saranjamdar or under Rule IX during his lifetime. (It is to be observed that a resumption under Rule IX can only be of the land because the rule directs that when the Saranjam is resumed Government itself shall make provisions for the maintenance of those entitled to it out of the revenues of the Saranjam so resumed. These revenues can only come out of the land\nRelief (d) in the prayer clause seeks a declaration that Government has to right to change Resolution No. 8969 dated the 7th of June, 1932. That Resolution directly relates to the land because it directs that the Gajendragad Saranjam he resumed and the Collector is directed to take steps to place the Saranjamdar in possession of the village of the Saranjam estate etc.\nIt is impossible to contend that this is not a claim relating to lands held as Saranjam.\nIn my opinion this is not a suit in which the rights claimed against the other defendants can be divorced from the claim against Government and considered separately. That is evident enough from paragraph 10 of the plaint. In paragraph 9 the power of Government to deprive the plaintiff of the rights he claims is challenged and in paragraph 10 the plaintiff explains that therefore the first and second defendants are not entitled to any of the rights and privileges of the Saranjamdar. One of those rights, as we have been from Rules VII and IX, is to take the revenues of the entire estate in order that he might fulfil his obligation regarding the payment of maintenance to certain members of the family and if the defendants claim to hold their lands under the orders of Government and the plaintiff insists on retaining Government as a party in order that it may be bound by the decree he wants against the other defendants it is obvious that his claim against these defendants cannot be separated from his claim against the Government. In any event, if the claim against Government is to be ignored it can only be on the basis that its orders cannot be challenged and if the orders stand it is evident that the plaintiff can have no hope of success because both sides hold their respective properties on the basis of those orders\nOn being faced with the dilemma that the suit against Government did not lie because of section 4 (a) (3) of the Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act of 1876, he asked the Court, as here to leave the Government out of consideration and decree his claim against the second defendant alone. The learned Judges held that that would amount to striking out the main relief sought against both the defendants and would change the character of the suit and added that as long as the Secretary of State is a party to the suit, such a declaration could not be granted\nMr. Gumaste, who appears for the appellant, says that his claim is not a claim against the Government but in that case be ought to strike out the Government. He is not prepared to strike out the Government because if he does they will not be bound by these proceedings and will follow the decision of their revenue tribunals. Therefore, he wants to make the Government a party in order that they may be bound. But, if they remain a party, it seems to me that there is a claim against them relating to property appertaining to the office of an hereditary officer, although no doubt it is quite true that the appellant does not desire to get any order against the Government as to the way in which the property should be dealt with or anything of the sort, and he only wants a declaration as to his title which will bind Government.\nThey held that the jurisdiction of the courts was ousted.\nWe are concerned here with section 4 (a) under that no question about an authorised act of Government arises. The section is general and bars all claims against the Crown relating to lands held as Saranjam. That is to say, even if the Government act is relation to such lands was ultra vires, a claim impugning the validity of such an act would fall within the scope of the exclusion in clause (a) provided it relates to such land.\nThere is a difference of opinion in the Bombay High Court as to whether section 4 is attracted if the only relief sought against Government is a declaration. One set of decision holds that that does not amount to a claim against Government.", + "expert_4": "The plaintiff appeals.\nThe suit relates to a Saranjam estate in the State of Bombay.\nThe plaintiff claims to be the sole Saranjamdar and seeks certain declarations and other reliefs appropriate to such a claim.\nThe first and second defendants are members of the plaintiffs family while the third defendant is the State of Bombay (Province of Bombay at the date of the suit).\nThe only question is whether the suit is barred by section 4 (a) of Bombay Act X of 1876 (Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act).\nThe following genealogical tree will show the relationship between the parties Bhujangrao Appasaheb (British grantee) \n Daulatrao I (died 24-7-1864) ----------------------------------------------------------------- \n Bhujangrao I Malojirao Yeshwantrao alias (died 1881) Annasaheb \n (widow) Krishnabai Daulatrao III Bhujangrao II Daulatrao II (Def. 1) (Def. 2) (died 8-5-1931) \n Bhujangrao III\nThe facts are as follows. A common ancestor of the present parties was given the Gajendragad estate as a Saranjam some time before the advent of the British.\nWhen they arrived on the scene they decided, as far as possible, to continue such Saranjams, jagirs and inams as had been granted by the earlier rulers, and accordingly they framed rules under Schedule B.\nRule 10 of Bombay Act XI of 1852 (The Bombay Rent Free Estates Act 1852) to regulate the mode of recognition and the succession and conditions of tenure to Saranjams, which are analogous to jagirs.\nIn compliance with this, the common ancestor shown at the head of the genealogical tree set out above was recognised by the British Government as the Saranjamdar of the Gajendragad estate.\nHe may for convenience be termed the British Grantee.\nThe Register Ex. P-53 shows that the estate consisted of villages.\nWe do not know the date of the British recognition but the nature of the tenure is described as follows - \n Continuable to all male legitimate descendants of the holder at the time of British conquest, viz., Bhujangrao Appasaheb, the first British Grantee, son of Bahirojirao Ghorpade.\nOn the death of the British Grantee (Bhujangrao Appasaheb) he was succeeded by his son Daulatrao I who dies on the 24th of July, 1864.\nThis Daulatrao I left three sons, bhujangrao I, Yeshwantrao and Malojirao.\nIn the year 1866 Bhujangrao I and his brother Yeshwantrao alias Annasaheb sued Malojirao for possession of this Saranjam.\nA question of impartibility was raised but the Bombay High Court declared that the property in British India was partible.\nThey further declared that Bhujangrao I was the head of the family and as such was entitled to a special assignment which was not to exceed a quarter share, for the expenses and duties which might devolve on him by virtue of his position, and that after this had been set aside each of the three brothers was entitled to an equal one-third share in the landed property in India.\nMalojirao separated himself from his brothers and was allotted seven villages.\nThe other two brothers continued joint and took the remainder.\nBut this was only with respect to property situate in British India. The parties also had property in the State of Kolhapur. That was left undivided.\nOn the 26th of April, 1882, they passed a Resolution embodying the following decision \n The adoption was to be recognised and the adapted son was to occupy the same position as his adoptive father, that is to say, he was to get one-third of the property plus the assignment given to him as head of the family.\nMalojirao who had already taken his share of the estate was to continue in possession.\nYeshwantrao (alias Annasaheb) was given the option of remaining joint with the adopted boy or separating.\nFinally, the Resolution concluded - \n The two brothers will hold their respective shares as their private property in virtue of the decree of the High Court and the Jahagir will henceforth be restricted to the portion awarded by the High Court to Bhujangrao which the adopted son will now inherit.\nIt should however be clearly understood that the decision of the High Court in not to be held as a precedent and that no partition of the Jahagir Estate to be continued to the adopted son will ever be allowed.\nThis position was emphasised by Government in the same year on the 22nd August, 1882.\nIt is continuable to all male legitimate descendants of the holder at the time of the British conquest and should Government ever sanction an adoption the terms of sanction would be those applicable to Saranjamdars.\nThe property should be dealt with like other Saranjams in the Political Department.\nThe District Deputy Collector, after inspecting the records, found that the name of the Khatedar Saranjamdar alone has found place in the village Inam register, in the Saranjam list and the land alienation register. while in the other village records the various members of the family were entered according to the actual wahivat or enjoyment. After due consideration he thought that the interest of Government and the Saranjamdar would be sufficiently safeguarded by allowing the same position to continue. He ordered the entries to be made accordingly. The order also discloses that the matter had been referred to the Legal Remembrancer to the Bombay Government. In the meanwhile, on the 5th of May, 1898, a set of Rules framed under Schedule B, Rule 10, of the Bombay Rent Free Estates Act of 1852 were drawn up and published in the Bombay Gazette.\nThese Rules were republished, probably with some modification, in the Gazette of 8th July, 1901. The portions applicable here were as follows - \n Saranjams shall ordinarily be continued in accordance with the decision already passed by Government in each case. II. A Saranjam which was decided to be hereditarily continuable shall ordinarily descend to the eldest male representative, in the order of primogeniture, of the senior branch of the family descended from the first British Grantee or any of his brothers who were undivided in interest. But Government reserve to themselves their rights for sufficient reason to direct the continuance of the Saranjam to any other member of the said family, or as an act of grace, to a person adopted into the same family with the sanction of Government. Every Saranjam shall be held as a life estate. It shall be formally resumed on the death of the holder and in cases in which it is capable of further continuance it shall be made over to the next holder as a fresh grant from Government unencumbered by any debts, or charges, save such as may be specially imposed by Government itself. VI. No Saranjam shall be capable of sub-division. VII. Every Saranjamdar shall be responsible for making a suitable provision for the maintenance of (certain members of the family enumerated in the Rule). IX. If an order passed by Government under Rule VII is not carried out, Government may, whatever the reason may be, direct the Saranjam, or a portion of it, to be resumed Provision for the members of the Suranjamdars family entitled to maintenance shall then be made by Government out of the revenues of the Saranjam so resumed.\nThe portions applicable here were as follows - \n Saranjams shall ordinarily be continued in accordance with the decision already passed by Government in each case.\nII. A Saranjam which was decided to be hereditarily continuable shall ordinarily descend to the eldest male representative, in the order of primogeniture, of the senior branch of the family descended from the first British Grantee or any of his brothers who were undivided in interest.\nBut Government reserve to themselves their rights for sufficient reason to direct the continuance of the Saranjam to any other member of the said family, or as an act of grace, to a person adopted into the same family with the sanction of Government.\nEvery Saranjam shall be held as a life estate.\nIt shall be formally resumed on the death of the holder and in cases in which it is capable of further continuance it shall be made over to the next holder as a fresh grant from Government unencumbered by any debts, or charges, save such as may be specially imposed by Government itself.\nVI. No Saranjam shall be capable of sub-division.\nVII.\nEvery Saranjamdar shall be responsible for making a suitable provision for the maintenance of (certain members of the family enumerated in the Rule).\nIX. If an order passed by Government under Rule VII is not carried out, Government may, whatever the reason may be, direct the Saranjam, or a portion of it, to be resumed Provision for the members of the Suranjamdars family entitled to maintenance shall then be made by Government out of the revenues of the Saranjam so resumed.\nAfter the District Deputy Collectors orders were passed on the 20th of May, 1930, Daulatrao II died on the 8th of May, 1931, and the matter was again taken up by Government.\nThis time it passed the following Resolution on the 7th of June, 1932. The Resolution was headed Resumption and regrant of the Gajendragad Saranjam standing at No. 91 of the Saranjam List. It reads - \n Resolution - The Governor-in-Council is pleased to direct that the Gajendragad Saranjam should be formally resumed and regranted to Bhujangrao Daulatrao Ghorpade eldest sun of the deceased Saranjamdar Sardar Daulatrao Bhujangrao Ghorpade and that it should be entered in his sole name in the accounts of the Collector of Dharwar with effect from the date of the death of the last holder. The Collector should take steps to place the Saranjamdar in possession of the villages of the Saranjam estate which were in possession of the deceased Saranjamdar. The Governor-in-Council agrees with the Commissioner, Southern Division, that the assignments held by the Bhaubands as potgi holders should be continued to them as at present.\nThe Bhujangrao mentioned in the Resolution is the plaintiff who is shown as Bhujangrao III in the genealogical tree.\nThe defendants were evidently aggrieved by this, for they filed Suit No. 23 of 1934 against the present plaintiff and the Secretary of State for India in Council praying inter alia that the properties, in that suit, viz., the villages allotted to their shares, were their independent and private properties and in case they were held to be Saranjam properties, they be declared as independent Saranjams, separate, and distinct from the one held by the present plaintiff.\nOn the 25th of February, 1936, Government passed the following Resolution - \n Resolution-After careful consideration the Governor-in-Council is pleased to confirm the decision in Government, Resolution (Political Department) No. 1769 dated the 17th of March, 1891, and to declare that the whole of the Gajendragad Estate shall be continuable as an inalienable and impartible Saranjam on the conditions stated in the said Resolution.\nHaving regard, however, to the manner in which different portions of the estate have been held by different branches of the family, the Governor-in-Council, in modification of the orders contained in Government esolution No. 8969 dated the 7th June, 1932, is pleased to direct that the portions of the said estate held by Sardar Bhujangrao Daulatrao Ghorpade, Daulatrao Malojirao Ghorpade and Bhujangrao Yeshwantrao Ghorpade, respectively, shall henceforth be entered in the Revenue Records as de facto shares in the said estate held by the said persons as representatives, respectively, of three branches of the Ghorpade family.\nEach of the said de facto shares shall be continuable hereditarily as such as if it were a separate Saranjam estate in accordance with the rules made for the continuance of Saranjams by the Governor-in-Council in exercise of the powers referred to in the rules framed under the Bombay Rent Free Estates Act, 1852, and section 2 (3) of the Bombay Summary Settlement Act (VII of 1863) and such special orders as the Governor-in-Council may make in regard to the Gajendragad Estate as a whole or in regard to the said share.\nThe recognition of the aforesaid shares and their entry in the Revenue Records as separate shares shall not be deemed to amount to a recognition of the estate of Gajendragad as in any manner partible or alienable and shall not in any way affect the right of Government to treat the said estate as an entire impartible and inalienable Saranjam estate.\nThe Governor-in-Council further directs that the aforesaid shares shall in no case be capable of sub-division and shall not in any way be alienated or encumbered except in accordance with the rules and orders referred to above \n The present suit is an attack on the action of Government in passing this Resolution.\nThe first and second defendants are the present representatives of the other branches of the family and the third defendant is the Province of Bombay (now the State of Bombay).\nThe plaint states - \n Government can have an jurisdiction to deprive the plaintiff at any rate during his lifetime of the full benefit of all the rights and privileges appertaining to the holder of a Saranjam.\nThe Order of Government of the 8th February, 1930 is, therefore, ultra vires and in no way binding on the present plaintiff \n Defendants 1 and 2, therefore, are not entitled to any right or privileges claimable by the holder of a Saranjam which according to the G.\nK. is continuable as an inalienable and impartible Saranjam, such as for example in the matter of appointment of the village officers in any of the 27 villages appertaining to the Gajendragad Saranjam.\nThe cause of action arose in April 1938 and the resolution and the entry being ultra vires is not binding \n As this is a suit claiming for relief primarily against defendants 1 and 2 defendant 3 is made a party to the suit in order to enable Government (defendant 3) to give proper effect to the decision of Government of the 17th March, 1891 and of 7th June, 1932, as against defendants 1 and 2 who have no right to the position which they claim \n The reliefs prayed for are - \n That it be declared that defendants 1 and 2 have no right to go behind the order of the Government as per Resolution No. 8969 of 7th June, 1932, under which plaintiff is entitled to be recognised as the sole Saranjamdar in the Revenue Records and that the assignments held by defendants 1 and 2 are held by them as mere potgi holders.\nThat in consequence of his position of a sole Saranjamdar the plaintiff alone at any rate during his lifetime has the sole right to the rights and privileges appertaining to the post of a sole Saranjamdar to wit, to be consulted in the appointment of the village officers in all the villages appertaining to the Saranjam estate, but assigned to defendants 1 and 2 for potgi \n Defendants 1 and 2 be restrained from doing any acts or taking any steps in contravention of the aforesaid right of the plaintiff.\nThat it be declared that defendant 3 (Government) have no right to change the Resolution No. 8969 of 7th June, 1932, and at any rate during the lifetime of the plaintiff.\nThe first Court dismissed the plaintiffs claim on the merits holding that Government had the right to amend its Resolution in the way it did.\nThe lower appellate Court also dismissed the suit on three grounds (1) that the two previous decisions of 1868 and 1908 operate as res judicata, (2) that the impugned Resolution is intra vires and (3) that section 4 (a) and (d) of the Revenue Jurisdiction Act bars the jurisdiction of the Court.\nIn second appeal the High Court only considered the question of jurisdiction and, agreeing, with the lower appellate Court on the point, dismissed the appeal but it granted the plaintiff leave no appeal to this Court.\nThe only question we have to consider is the one of jurisdiction.\nSection 4 of the Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act, 1876 (Bombay Act X of 1876), runs - \n Subject to the exceptions hereinafter appearing, no Civil Court shall exercise jurisdiction as to - \n (a) claims against the Crown relating to lands held as Saranjam \n It was strenuously contended that this is not a claim against the Crown but one against the first and second defendants.\nThat in my opinion is an idle contention in view of paragraphs 9 and 12 of the plaint and reliefs (a) and (d).\nIn any event, Mr.\nSomayya was asked whether he would strike out the third defendant and those portions of the plaint which sought relief against it.\nHe said he was not prepared to do so.\nI cannot see how a plaintiff can insist on retaining a person against whom he claims no relief as a party. I am clear that this is a suit against the Crown within the meaning of section 4 (a).\nThe next question is whether, assuming that to be the case, it is also one relating to lands held as Saranjam.\nSo far as the reliefs sought against Government are concerned, that is clearly the case.\nParagraph 9 of the plaint challenges Governments jurisdiction to deprive the plaintiff of the full benefit of all rights and privileges appertaining to the holder of a Saranjam. these rights cannot exist apart from the lands which form part of the Saranjam estate and the implication of the prayer is that Government has, for example, no right to resume the Saranjam either under Rule V on the death of the last Saranjamdar or under Rule IX during his lifetime.\n(It is to be observed that a resumption under Rule IX can only be of the land because the rule directs that when the Saranjam is resumed Government itself shall make provisions for the maintenance of those entitled to it out of the revenues of the Saranjam so resumed.\nThese revenues can only come out of the land.\nRelief (d) in the prayer clause seeks a declaration that Government has to right to change Resolution No. 8969 dated the 7th of June, 1932.\nThat Resolution directly relates to the land because it directs that the Gajendragad Saranjam he resumed and the Collector is directed to take steps to place the Saranjamdar in possession of the village of the Saranjam estate etc.\nIt is impossible to contend that this is not a claim relating to lands held as Saranjam.\nIt was next argued that if that be the case the claim against Government can be dismissed and the plaintiff can at least be given the reliefs claimed against the other two defendants.\nThese, it was contended, do not relate to land and in any event are not claims against the Crown\nIn my opinion this is not a suit in which the rights claimed against the other defendants can be divorced from the claim against Government and considered separately.\nThat is evident enough from paragraph 10 of the plaint. In paragraph 9 the power of Government to deprive the plaintiff of the rights he claims is challenged and in paragraph 10 the plaintiff explains that therefore the first and second defendants are not entitled to any of the rights and privileges of the Saranjamdar.\nOne of those rights, as we have been from Rules VII and IX, is to take the revenues of the entire estate in order that he might fulfil his obligation regarding the payment of maintenance to certain members of the family and if the defendants claim to hold their lands under the orders of Government and the plaintiff insists on retaining Government as a party in order that it may be bound by the decree he wants against the other defendants it is obvious that his claim against these defendants cannot be separated from his claim against the Government.\nIn any event, if the claim against Government is to be ignored it can only be on the basis that its orders cannot be challenged and if the orders stand it is evident that the plaintiff can have no hope of success because both sides hold their respective properties on the basis of those orders.\nThere are two decisions of the Bombay High Court which have taken this view. Basalingappagouda v. The Secretary of State for India (28 Bom.\nL.R. 651) was a Watan case Government had recognised the second defendant as the Watandar.\nThe learned Judges held that that would amount to striking out the main relief sought against both the defendants and would change the character of the suit and added that as long as the Secretary of State is a party to the suit, such a declaration could not be granted.\nIn the other case, Basangauda v. The Secretary of State (32 Bom.\nBeaumont C.J. and Baker J. took the same view.\nThey held that the jurisdiction of the courts was ousted.\nIt was next contended, on the strength of a decision of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council reported in Province of Bombay v. Hormusji Manekji (74 I.A. 103) that the courts have jurisdiction to decide whether Government acted in excess of its powers and that that question must be decided first.\nIn my opinion, this decision does not apply here.\nTheir Lordships were dealing with a case falling under section 4 (b) of the Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act of 1876. That provides that - \n no Civil Court shall exercise jurisdiction as to \n (b) objections to the amount or incidence of any assessment of land revenue authorised by the Provincial Government.\nThus, before the exclusion of the Civil Courts jurisdiction under section 4 (b) could come into play, the Court had to determine the issue of ultra vires.\nConsequently, their Lordships held that that question was outside the scope of the bar.\nBut the position here is different. We are concerned here with section 4 (a) under that no question about an authorised act of Government arises.\nThe section is general and bars all claims against the Crown relating to lands held as Saranjam.\nThat is to say, even if the Government act is relation to such lands was ultra vires, a claim impugning the validity of such an act would fall within the scope of the exclusion in clause (a) provided it relates to such land.\nThere is a difference of opinion in the Bombay High Court as to whether section 4 is attracted if the only relief sought against Government is a declaration.\nOne set of decision holds that that does not amount to a claim against Government. Dattatraya Vishwanath v.\nThe Secretary of State for India I.L.R. 1948 Bom. 809 at 820 is typical of that view.", + "expert_5": "The suit relates to a Saranjam estate in the State of Bombay.\nEvery Saranjamdar shall be responsible for making a suitable provision for the maintenance of (certain members of the family enumerated in the Rule).\nIf an order passed by Government under Rule VII is not carried out, Government may, whatever the reason may be, direct the Saranjam, or a portion of it, to be resumed Provision for the members of the Suranjamdars family entitled to maintenance shall then be made by Government out of the revenues of the Saranjam so resumed.\nThe Governor-in-Council is pleased to direct that the Gajendragad Saranjam should be formally resumed and regranted to Bhujangrao Daulatrao Ghorpade eldest sun of the deceased Saranjamdar Sardar Daulatrao Bhujangrao Ghorpade and that it should be entered in his sole name in the accounts of the Collector of Dharwar with effect from the date of the death of the last holder.\nGovernment can have an jurisdiction to deprive the plaintiff at any rate during his lifetime of the full benefit of all the rights and privileges appertaining to the holder of a Saranjam.\nThe Order of Government of the 8th February, 1930 is, therefore, ultra vires and in no way binding on the present plaintiff \n Defendants 1 and 2, therefore, are not entitled to any right or privileges claimable by the holder of a Saranjam which according to the G. K. is continuable as an inalienable and impartible Saranjam, such as for example in the matter of appointment of the village officers in any of the 27 villages appertaining to the Gajendragad Saranjam\nplaintiff is entitled to be recognised as the sole Saranjamdar in the Revenue Records and that the assignments held by defendants 1 and 2 are held by them as mere potgi holders.\nThat in consequence of his position of a sole Saranjamdar the plaintiff alone at any rate during his lifetime has the sole right to the rights and privileges appertaining to the post of a sole Saranjamdar to wit, to be consulted in the appointment of the village officers in all the villages appertaining to the Saranjam estate, but assigned to defendants 1 and 2 for potgi\nno Civil Court shall exercise jurisdiction as to - \n (a) claims against the Crown relating to lands held as Saranjam\nThat in my opinion is an idle contention in view of paragraphs 9 and 12 of the plaint and reliefs (a) and (d).\nIn any event, Mr. Somayya was asked whether he would strike out the third defendant and those portions of the plaint which sought relief against it. He said he was not prepared to do so. I cannot see how a plaintiff can insist on retaining a person against whom he claims no relief as a party.\nI am clear that this is a suit against the Crown within the meaning of section 4 (a).\nSo far as the reliefs sought against Government are concerned, that is clearly the case.\nParagraph 9 of the plaint challenges Governments jurisdiction to deprive the plaintiff of the full benefit of all rights and privileges appertaining to the holder of a Saranjam. these rights cannot exist apart from the lands which form part of the Saranjam estate and the implication of the prayer is that Government has, for example, no right to resume the Saranjam either under Rule V on the death of the last Saranjamdar or under Rule IX during his lifetime.\nIt is to be observed that a resumption under Rule IX can only be of the land because the rule directs that when the Saranjam is resumed Government itself shall make provisions for the maintenance of those entitled to it out of the revenues of the Saranjam so resumed. These revenues can only come out of the land.\nRelief (d) in the prayer clause seeks a declaration that Government has to right to change Resolution No. 8969 dated the 7th of June, 1932.\nThat Resolution directly relates to the land because it directs that the Gajendragad Saranjam he resumed and the Collector is directed to take steps to place the Saranjamdar in possession of the village of the Saranjam estate etc.\nIt is impossible to contend that this is not a claim relating to lands held as Saranjam.\nthis is not a suit in which the rights claimed against the other defendants can be divorced from the claim against Government and considered separately.\nIn paragraph 9 the power of Government to deprive the plaintiff of the rights he claims is challenged and in paragraph 10 the plaintiff explains that therefore the first and second defendants are not entitled to any of the rights and privileges of the Saranjamdar.\nOne of those rights, as we have been from Rules VII and IX, is to take the revenues of the entire estate in order that he might fulfil his obligation regarding the payment of maintenance to certain members of the family\nthe plaintiff insists on retaining Government as a party in order that it may be bound by the decree he wants against the other defendants it is obvious that his claim against these defendants cannot be separated from his claim against the Government.\nIn any event, if the claim against Government is to be ignored it can only be on the basis that its orders cannot be challenged and if the orders stand it is evident that the plaintiff can have no hope of success because both sides hold their respective properties on the basis of those orders.\nThere are two decisions of the Bombay High Court which have taken this view.\nBasalingappagouda v. The Secretary of State for India (28 Bom. L.R. 651)\nThe learned Judges held that that would amount to striking out the main relief sought against both the defendants and would change the character of the suit and added that as long as the Secretary of State is a party to the suit, such a declaration could not be granted.\nBasangauda v. The Secretary of State\nHe is not prepared to strike out the Government because if he does they will not be bound by these proceedings and will follow the decision of their revenue tribunals. Therefore, he wants to make the Government a party in order that they may be bound. But, if they remain a party, it seems to me that there is a claim against them relating to property appertaining to the office of an hereditary officer, although no doubt it is quite true that the appellant does not desire to get any order against the Government as to the way in which the property should be dealt with or anything of the sort, and he only wants a declaration as to his title which will bind Government. They held that the jurisdiction of the courts was ousted.\nWe are concerned here with section 4 (a) under that no question about an authorised act of Government arises.\nThe section is general and bars all claims against the Crown relating to lands held as Saranjam. That is to say, even if the Government act is relation to such lands was ultra vires, a claim impugning the validity of such an act would fall within the scope of the exclusion in clause (a) provided it relates to such land." + }, + "1953_14": { + "expert_1": "Eventually after various further proceedings the Assistant Commissioner on the 8th April, 1950, assessed the assessee, to the best of his judgment, in the sum of Rs. 58,657140 and a copy of the order in Form XIV was sent to the assessee. Being aggrieved by the order of assessment the assessee on the 10th May, 1950, preferred an appeal to the Sales Tax Commissioner, Madhya Pradesh, under section 22(l) of the Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The appeal not having been accompanied by any proof of the payment of the tax in respect of which the appeal had been preferred, the authorities, after giving the assessee several adjournments, declined to admit the appeal. \nThe assessee moved the Board of Revenue, Madhya Pradesh, by a revision application against the order of the Sales Tax Commissioner contending that his appeal was not governed by the proviso to section 22(l) of the Act as amended on the 25th November, 1949, by the Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax (Second Amendment) Act (Act LVII of 1949) but was governed by the proviso to section 22(l) of the Act as it stood when the assessment proceedings were started, i.e., before the said amendment.\nThe Board of Revenue took the view that as the order of assessment was made after the amendment of the section and the appeal was filed thereafter such appeal must be governed by the provisions of law as it existed at the time the appeal was actually filed and that the law as it existed before the filing of the appeal could not apply to the case.\nThe assessee thereupon moved the High Court of Madhya Pradesh under articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying, amongst other things, for a writ of mandamus or an appropriate order directing the Sales Tax Commissioner to admit and hear the appeal without demanding payment of the amount of sales tax assessed by the Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax. The High Court dismissed the application on the 2nd August, 1951. The assessee applied to the High Court for leave to appeal to this Court which was also dismissed by the High Court on the 14th March, 1952. \nThe assessee thereupon applied to this Court for special leave to appeal on the 12th May, 1952. This Court granted special leave to appeal, but such leave was, by the order granting such leave, limited to the question of the effect of the amendment to section 22 of the Act on the petitioners appeal to the Sales Tax Commissioner, Madhya Pradesh. This Court took the view that the other questions sought to be raised by the assessee would have to be decided by the Sales Tax Commissioner in case the appeal succeeded. The appeal has now come up for final disposal before us and in this appeal we are concerned only with the limited question of the effect of the amendment to section 22 of the Act.\nIt is clear from the language used in the proviso to section 22 (1) as it stood prior to the amendment that an aggrieved assessee had only to pay such amount of tax as he might admit to be due from him, whereas under the proviso to section 22(l) as amended the appeal has to be accompanied by satisfactory proof of payment of the tax in respect of which the appeal had been preferred.\nThe contention of the present assessee is that as the amendment has not been made retrospective its right of appeal under the original section 22(l) remains unaffected and that accordingly as it does not admit anything to be due it was not liable to deposit any sum along with its appeal and the Commissioner was bound to admit its appeal and had no jurisdiction or power to reject it on the ground that it had not been accompanied by any proof of payment of the tax assessed against the appellant as required under the amended proviso and the Board of Revenue and the High Court were in error in not directing the Commissioner to admit the appeal. \nThat the amendment has placed a substantial restriction on the assessees right of appeal cannot be disputed, for the amended section requires the payment of the entire assessed amount as a condition precedent to the admission of its appeal.\nThe question is whether the imposition of such a restriction by amendment of the section can affect the assessees right of appeal from a decision in proceedings which commenced prior to such amendment and which right of appeal was free from such restriction under the section asit stood at the time of the commencement of the proceedings. The question was answered in the negative by the Judicial Committee in Colonial. Sugar Refining Co., Ltd. v. Irving(1).\nAnd therefore the only question is, was the appeal to His Majesty in Council a right vested in the appellants at the date of the passing of the Act, or was it a mere matter of procedure ? It seems to their Lordships that the question does not admit of doubt. To deprive a suitor in a pending action of an appeal to a superior tribunal which belonged to him as of right is a very different thing from regulating procedure.\nIn princi- ple, their Lordships see no difference between abolishing an appeal altogether and transferring the appeal to a new tribunal. In either case there is an interference with existing rights contrary to the well-known general principle that statutes are not to be held to act retrospectively unless a clear intention to that effect is manifested. The principle of the above decision was applied by Jenkins \n J. in Nana bin Aba v. Sheku bin Andu (1) and by the Privy Council itself in Delhi Cloth and General Mills Co. Ltd. v. Income-tax Commissioner, Delhi().\nIt was there regarded as settled that the right of appeal was not a mere matter of procedure but was a vested right which inhered in a party from the com mencement of the action in the Court of first instance and such right could not be taken away except by an express provision or by necessary implication.\nNow, the reasoning of the Judicial Committee in The Colonial Sugar Refining Companys case is a conclusive authority to show that rights of appeal are not matters of procedure, and that the right to enter the superior court is for the present purpose deemed to arise to a litigant before any decision has been given by the inferior court. If the latter proposition be accepted, I can see no intermediate point at which to resist the conclusion that the right arises at the date of the suit. \n It was held that the new clause could not be given retrospective effect and accordingly the date of pre- sentation of the second appeal to the High Court was not the date which determined the applicability of the amended clause of the Letters Patent and that the date of the institution of the suit was the determining factor.\nIn so far as the first ground is concerned it clearly runs counter to the decision of the Privy Council in Colonial Sugar Refining Co. Ltd. v. Irving (supra) and must be taken as overruled as Fawcett J. himself acknowledged at page 756. As regards the second ground it is inapplicable to the case before us and it is not necessary to express any opinion as to the. soundness and validity of that ground.\nThe case of Nagendra Nath Bose v. Mon Mohan Singha Roy (7) is indeed very much to the point.\nThat. application having been dismissed for default of his appearance the petitioner preferred an appeal to the District Judge of Hoogly who refused to admit the appeal on the ground that the amount recoverable in execution of the decree had not been deposited as required by the proviso to section 174, clause (c), of the Bengal Tenancy Act as amended by an amending Act in 1928. The contention of the petitioner was that the amended provision which came into force on the 21st February, 1929, could not affect the right of\nappeal from a decision on an application made on the 19th December, 1928, for setting aside the sale. Mitter J. said at page\nWe think the contention of the petitioner is wellfounded and must prevail. \n That a right of appeal is a substantive right cannot now be seriously disputed. It is not a mere matter of procedure.\nThere can be no doubt that the right of appeal has been affected by the new provision and in the absence of an express enactment this amendment cannot apply to proceedings pending at the date when the new amendment came into force. It is true that the appeal was filed after the Act came into force, but that circumstance is immaterial--for the date to be looked into for this purpose is the date of the original proceeding which eventually culminated in the appeal.\nThe, above decisions quite firmly establish and our decisions in Janardan Reddy v. The State (1) and in Ganpat Rai v. Agarwal Chamber of Commerce Ltd. (2) uphold the principle that a right of appeal is not merely a matter of procedure. It is matter of substantive right. This right of appeal from the decision of an .inferior tribunal to a superior tribunal becomes vested in a party when proceedings are first initiated in, and before a decision is given by, the inferior court. \n In the language of Jenkins C.J. in Nana bin Aba v. Shaik bin Andu (supra) to disturb an existing right of appeal is not a mere alteration in procedure. Such a vested right cannot be taken away except by express enactment or necessary intendment. An intention to interfere with or to impair or imperil such a vested right cannot be presumed unless such intention be clearly manifested by express words or necessary implication.\nUnless the contrary can be shown, the provision which takes away jurisdiction is itself subject to the implied saving of the litigants right. \n In our view the above observation is apposite and applies to the case before us. The true implication of the above observation as of the decisions in the other cases referred to above is that the pre-existing right of appeal is not destroyed by the amendment if the amendment is not made retrospective by express words or necessary intendment. The fact that the pre-existing right of appeal continues to exist must, in its turn, necessarily imply that the old law which created that right of appeal must also exist to support the continuation of that right. As the old law continues to exist for the purpose of supporting the pre- existing right of appeal that old law must govern the exercise and enforcement of that right of appeal and there can then be no question of the amended provision preventing the exercise of that right. The argument that the authority has no option or jurisdiction to admit the appeal unless it be accompanied by the deposit of the assessed tax as required by the amended proviso to section 22(1) of the Act overlooks the fact of existence of the old law for the purpose of supporting the pre-existing right and really amounts to begging the question. The new proviso is wholly inapplicable in such a situation and the jurisdiction of the authority has to be exercised under the old law which so continues to exist. The argument of Sri Ganapathy lyer on this point, therefore, cannot be accepted.\nIn the first place the onerous condition may in a given case prevent the exercise of the right of appeal, for the assessee may not be in a position to find the necessary money in time. Further this argument cannot prevail in view of the decision of the Calcutta High Court in Nagendra Nath Bose v. Mon Mohan Singha (supra). No cogent argument has been adduced before us to show that that decision is not correct. There can be no doubt that the new requirement touches the substantive right of appeal vested in the appellant. Nor can it be overlooked that such a requirement is calculated to interfere with or fetter, if not to impair or imperil, the substantive right. The right that the amended section gives is certainly less than the right which was available before. \n A provision which is calculated to deprive the appellant of the unfettered right of appeal cannot be regarded as a mere alteration in procedure. Indeed the new requirement cannot be said merely to regulate the exercise of the appellants pre-existing right but in truth whittles down the right itself and cannot be regarded as a mere rule of procedure. Finally, Sri Ganapathy lyer faintly urges that until actual assessment there can be no lis and, therefore, no right of appeal can accrue before that event. There are two answers to this plea. Whenever there is a proposition by one party and an opposition to that proposition by another a lis arises. \n It may be conceded, though not deciding it, that when the assessee files his return a lis may not immediately arise, for under section 11 (1) the authority may accept the return as correct and complete. But if the authority is not satisfied as to the correctness of the return and calls for evidence, surely a controversy arises involving a proposition by the assessee and an opposition by the State. The circumstance that the authority who raises the dispute is himself the judge can make no difference, for the authority raises the dispute in the interest of the State and in so acting only represents the State. \n It 1000 will appear from the dates given above that in this case the lis in the sense explained above arose before the date of amendment of the section. Further, even if the lis is to be taken as arising only on the date of assessment, there was a possibility of such a lis arising as soon as proceedings started with the filing of the return or, at any rate, when the authority called for evidence and started the hearing and the right of appeal must be taken to have been in existence even at those dates. For the purposes of the accrual of the right of appeal the critical and relevant date is the date of initiation of the proceedings and not the decision itself.", + "expert_2": "Being aggrieved by the order of assessment the assessee on the 10th May, 1950, preferred an appeal to the Sales Tax Commissioner, Madhya Pradesh, under section 22(l) of the Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The appeal not having been accompanied by any proof of the payment of the tax in respect of which the appeal had been preferred, the authorities, after giving the assessee several adjournments, declined to admit the appeal.\nThe Board of Revenue took the view that as the order of assessment was made after the amendment of the section and the appeal was filed thereafter such appeal must be governed by the provisions of law as it existed at the time the appeal was actually filed and that the law as it existed before the filing of the appeal could not apply to the case.\nlimited to the question of the effect of the amendment to section 22 of the Act on the petitioners appeal to the Sales Tax Commissioner, Madhya Pradesh.\nIt is clear from the language used in the proviso to section 22 (1) as it stood prior to the amendment that an aggrieved assessee had only to pay such amount of tax as he might admit to be due from him, whereas under the proviso to section 22(l) as amended the appeal has to be accompanied by satisfactory proof of payment of the tax in respect of which the appeal had been preferred. The contention of the present assessee is that as the amendment has not been made retrospective its right of appeal under the original section 22(l) remains unaffected and that accordingly as it does not admit anything to be due it was not liable to deposit any sum along with its appeal and the Commissioner was bound to admit its appeal and had no jurisdiction or power to reject it on the ground that it had not been accompanied by any proof of payment of the tax assessed against the appellant as required under the amended proviso and the Board of Revenue and the High Court were in error in not directing the Commissioner to admit the appeal.\nThe question is whether the imposition of such a restriction by amendment of the section can affect the assessees right of appeal from a decision in proceedings which commenced prior to such amendment and which right of appeal was free from such restriction under the section asit stood at the time of the commencement of the proceedings.\nThe appellants having with the leave of the Supreme Court filed an appeal to the Privy Council the respondents filed a petition taking the preliminary point that no appeal lay to the Privy Council and praying that the appeal be dismissed. in dismissing that application Lord Macnaghten who delivered the judgment of the Privy Council said- As regards the general principles applicable to the case there was no controversy.\nIn princi- ple, their Lordships see no difference between abolishing an appeal altogether and transferring the appeal to a new tribunal.\nIt was there regarded as settled that the right of appeal was not a mere matter of procedure but was a vested right which inhered in a party from the com mencement of the action in the Court of first instance and such right could not be taken away except by an express provision or by necessary implication.\nSardar Ali v. Dalimuddin\nThe contention of the appellants was that the amended clause could not be applied to that appeal, for to do so would be to apply it retrospectively and to impair and indeed to defeat a substantive right which was in existence (1) (1908) I.L.R. 32 Bom. 337. (3) A. I. R 1928 Lah. 627. (2) (1927) L.R. 54 I.A. 421 I.L.R. 9 Lah. 284. (4) (1929) \n L.R. 56 Cal. 5I2. prior to the date of the amendment.\nthe reasoning of the Judicial Committee in The Colonial Sugar Refining Companys case is a conclusive authority to show that rights of appeal are not matters of procedure, and that the right to enter the superior court is for the present purpose deemed to arise to a litigant before any decision has been given by the inferior court.\nIt was held that the new clause could not be given retrospective effect and accordingly the date of pre- sentation of the second appeal to the High Court was not the date which determined the applicability of the amended clause of the Letters Patent and that the date of the institution of the suit was the determining factor.\napplication having been dismissed for default of his appearance the petitioner preferred an appeal to the District Judge of Hoogly who refused to admit the appeal on the ground that the amount recoverable in execution of the decree had not been deposited as required by the proviso to section 174, clause (c), of the Bengal Tenancy Act as amended by an amending Act in 1928.\nThe contention of the petitioner was that the amended provision which came into force on the 21st February, 1929, could not affect the right of appeal from a decision on an application made on the 19th December, 1928, for setting aside the sale.\nThat a right of appeal is a substantive right cannot now be seriously disputed. It is not a mere matter of procedure.\nPrior to the amendment of 1928 there was an appeal against an order refusing to set aside a sale (for that is the effect also where the application to set aside the sale is dismissed for default) under the provisions of Order 43, rule (1), of the Code of Civil Procedure. That right was unhampered by any restriction of the kind now imposed by section 174(5), Proviso.\nBy requiring such deposit as a condition precedent to the admission of the appeal, a new restriction has been put on the right of appeal, the, admission of which is now hedged in with a condition. There can be no doubt that the right of appeal has been affected by the new provision and in the absence of an express enactment this amendment cannot apply to proceedings pending at the date when the new amendment came into force.\nIt is true that the appeal was filed after the Act came into force, but that circumstance is immaterial--for the date to be looked into for this purpose is the date of the original proceeding which eventually culminated in the appeal.\nGanpat Rai v. Agarwal Chamber of Commerce Ltd. (2) uphold the principle that a right of appeal is not merely a matter of procedure. It is matter of substantive right. This right of appeal from the decision of an .inferior tribunal to a superior tribunal becomes vested in a party when proceedings are first initiated in, and before a decision is given by, the inferior court.\nSri Ganapathy Aiyar urges that the language of section 22(1) as amended clearly makes the section ret. rospective. The new proviso, it is pointed out, peremptorily requires the authority not to admit the appeal unless it be accompanied by a satisfactory proof of the payment of the tax in respect of which the appeal is preferred and this duty the authority must discharge at the time the appeal is actually preferred before him. The argument is that after the amendment the authority has no option in the matter and he has no jurisdiction to admit any appeal unless the assessed tax be deposited. It follows, therefore, by necessary implication, according to the learned Advocate, that the amended provision applies to an appeal from an assessment order made before the date of amendment as well as to an appeal from an order made after that date.\nUnless the contrary can be shown, the provision which takes away jurisdiction is itself subject to the implied saving of the litigants right.\nthe pre-existing right of appeal is not destroyed by the amendment if the amendment is not made retrospective by express words or necessary intendment.\nThe argument that the authority has no option or jurisdiction to admit the appeal unless it be accompanied by the deposit of the assessed tax as required by the amended proviso to section 22(1) of the Act overlooks the fact of existence of the old law for the purpose of supporting the pre-existing right and really amounts to begging the question. The new proviso is wholly inapplicable in such a situation and the jurisdiction of the authority has to be exercised under the old law which so continues to exist.\nthe requirment as to the deposit of the amount of the assessed costs does not affect the right of appeal itself which still remains intact, but only introduces a new matter of procedure\nthe onerous condition may in a given case prevent the exercise of the right of appeal, for the assessee may not be in a position to find the necessary money in time.\nIndeed the new requirement cannot be said merely to regulate the exercise of the appellants pre-existing right but in truth whittles down the right itself and cannot be regarded as a mere rule of procedure.\neven if the lis is to be taken as arising only on the date of assessment, there was a possibility of such a lis arising as soon as proceedings started with the filing of the return or, at any rate, when the authority called for evidence and started the hearing and the right of appeal must be taken to have been in existence even at those dates.\nFor the purposes of the accrual of the right of appeal the critical and relevant date is the date of initiation of the proceedings and not the decision itself.", + "expert_3": "On the 28th November, 1947, the appellant Hoosein Kasam Dada (India) Ltd., (hereinafter referred to as the assessee) submited to the Sales Tax Officer, Akola, a Sales Tax return in Form IV for the first quarter\nNotice in Form XI calling upon the assessee to produce evidence in support of the said return having been issued by the Sales Tax Officer, the assessee produced his account books. Not being satisfied by the inspection of the account books as to the correctness of the return and being of opinion that the taxable turnover exceeded rupees two lacs the Sales Tax Officer submitted the case to the Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax, Amravati, for assessment, On the 25th January, 1949, the Assistant Commissioner issued a fresh notice in Form XI under section 11 and fixed the case for disposal on the 5th February, 1949\nEventually after various further proceedings the Assistant Commissioner on the 8th April, 1950, assessed the assessee, to the best of his judgment, in the sum of Rs. 58,657140 and a copy of the order in Form XIV was sent to the assessee.\nThe assessee moved the Board of Revenue, Madhya Pradesh, by a revision application against the order of the Sales Tax Commissioner contending that his appeal was not governed by the proviso to section 22(l) of the Act as amended on the 25th November, 1949, by the Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax (Second Amendment) Act (Act LVII of 1949) but was governed by the proviso to section 22(l) of the Act as it stood when the assessment proceedings were started, i.e., before the said amendment. The Board of Revenue took the view that as the order of assessment was made after the amendment of the section and the appeal was filed thereafter such appeal must be governed by the provisions of law as it existed at the time the appeal was actually filed and that the law as it existed before the filing of the appeal could not apply to the case\nThe assessee thereupon moved the High Court of Madhya Pradesh under articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying, amongst other things, for a writ of mandamus or an appropriate order directing the Sales Tax Commissioner to admit and hear the appeal without demanding payment of the amount of sales tax assessed by the Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax. The High Court dismissed the application on the 2nd August, 1951. The assessee applied to the High Court for leave to appeal to this Court which was also dismissed by the High Court on the 14th March, 1952.\nThis Court granted special leave to appeal, but such leave was, by the order granting such leave, limited to the question of the effect of the amendment to section 22 of the Act on the petitioners appeal to the Sales Tax Commissioner, Madhya Pradesh\nSection 22(l) of the Act was originally expressed in the following terms - 22. (1) Any dealer aggrieved by an order under this Act may, in the prescribed manner, appeal to the prescribed authority against the order Provided that no appeal against an order of assessment, with or without penalty, shall be entertained by the said authority unless it is satisfied that such amount of tax or penalty or both as the appellant may admit to be due from him, has been paid. \nThe relevant portion of section 22 as amended runs as follows-- 22. (1) Any dealer aggrieved by an order under this Act may, in the prescribed manner, appeal to the prescribed authority against the order Provided that no appeal against an order of assessment, with or without penalty shall be admitted by the said authority unless such appeal is accompanied by a satisfactory proof of the payment of the tax, with penalty, if any, in respect of which the appeal has been preferred.\nIt is clear from the language used in the proviso to section 22 (1) as it stood prior to the amendment that an aggrieved assessee had only to pay such amount of tax as he might admit to be due from him, whereas under the proviso to section 22(l) as amended the appeal has to be accompanied by satisfactory proof of payment of the tax in respect of which the appeal had been preferred.\nThat the amendment has placed a substantial restriction on the assessees right of appeal cannot be disputed, for the amended section requires the payment of the entire assessed amount as a condition precedent to the admission of its appeal. The question is whether the imposition of such a restriction by amendment of the section can affect the assessees right of appeal from a decision in proceedings which commenced prior to such amendment and which right of appeal was free from such restriction under the section asit stood at the time of the commencement of the proceedings.\nThe question was answered in the negative by the Judicial Committee in Colonial. Sugar Refining Co., Ltd. v. Irving\nTo deprive a suitor in a pending action of an appeal to a superior tribunal which belonged to him as of right is a very different thing from regulating procedure. In princi- ple, their Lordships see no difference between abolishing an appeal altogether and transferring the appeal to a new tribunal. In either case there is an interference with existing rights contrary to the well-known general principle that statutes are not to be held to act retrospectively unless a clear intention to that effect is manifested\nA Full Bench of the Lahore High Court adopted it in Kirpa Singh v. Rasaldar Ajaipal Singh (3). It was there regarded as settled that the right of appeal was not a mere matter of procedure but was a vested right which inhered in a party from the com mencement of the action in the Court of first instance and such right could not be taken away except by an express provision or by necessary implication\nthe reasoning of the Judicial Committee in The Colonial Sugar Refining Companys case is a conclusive authority to show that rights of appeal are not matters of procedure, and that the right to enter the superior court is for the present purpose deemed to arise to a litigant before any decision has been given by the inferior court.\nIf the latter proposition be accepted, I can see no intermediate point at which to resist the conclusion that the right arises at the date of the suit. \n It was held that the new clause could not be given retrospective effect and accordingly the date of pre- sentation of the second appeal to the High Court was not the date which determined the applicability of the amended clause of the Letters Patent and that the date of the institution of the suit was the determining factor\nThe principle laid down in the Colonial Sugar Refining Co.s case (supra) was followed by a Special Bench of Madras in In re Vasudeva Samiar (2). A Full Bench of the Allahabad High Court in Ram Singha v. Shankar Dayal (3) fell into line and held that the earlier decision on this point of that Court in Zamin Ali Khan v. Genda (4) stood overruled by the Privy Council decision in the Colonial Sugar Refining Co.s case\nA Full Bench of Nagpur High Court in Radhakisan v. Shridar (5 ) has also taken the same view. The Punjab High Court has also adopted the same line in Gordhan Das v. The Governor General in Council (1). The case of Nagendra Nath Bose v. Mon Mohan Singha Roy (7) is indeed very much to the point.\nThat a right of appeal is a substantive right cannot now be seriously disputed. It is not a mere matter of procedure. Prior to the amendment of 1928 there was an appeal against an order refusing to set aside a sale (for that is the effect also where the application to set aside the sale is dismissed for default) under the provisions of Order 43, rule (1), of the Code of Civil Procedure. That right was unhampered by any restriction of the kind now imposed by section 174(5), Proviso. The Court was bound to admit the appeal whether appellant deposited the amount recoverable in execution of the decree or not\nBy requiring such deposit as a condition precedent to the admission of the appeal, a new restriction has been put on the right of appeal, the, admission of which is now hedged in with a condition. There can be no doubt that the right of appeal has been affected by the new provision and in the absence of an express enactment this amendment cannot apply to proceedings pending at the date when the new amendment came into force. It is true that the appeal was filed after the Act came into force, but that circumstance is immaterial--for the date to be looked into for this purpose is the date of the original proceeding which eventually culminated in the appeal.\nThe, above decisions quite firmly establish and our decisions in Janardan Reddy v. The State (1) and in Ganpat Rai v. Agarwal Chamber of Commerce Ltd. (2) uphold the principle that a right of appeal is not merely a matter of procedure. It is matter of substantive right. This right of appeal from the decision of an .inferior tribunal to a superior tribunal becomes vested in a party when proceedings are first initiated in, and before a decision is given by, the inferior court\nto disturb an existing right of appeal is not a mere alteration in procedure. Such a vested right cannot be taken away except by express enactment or necessary intendment. An intention to interfere with or to impair or imperil such a vested right cannot be presumed unless such intention be clearly manifested by express words or necessary implication\nUnless the contrary can be shown, the provision which takes away jurisdiction is itself subject to the implied saving of the litigants right.\nIn our view the above observation is apposite and applies to the case before us. The true implication of the above observation as of the decisions in the other cases referred to above is that the pre-existing right of appeal is not destroyed by the amendment if the amendment is not made retrospective by express words or necessary intendment. The fact that the pre-existing right of appeal continues to exist must, in its turn, necessarily imply that the old law which created that right of appeal must also exist to support the continuation of that right. As the old law continues to exist for the purpose of supporting the pre- existing right of appeal that old law must govern the exercise and enforcement of that right of appeal and there can then be no question of the amended provision preventing the exercise of that right.\nThe argument that the authority has no option or jurisdiction to admit the appeal unless it be accompanied by the deposit of the assessed tax as required by the amended proviso to section 22(1) of the Act overlooks the fact of existence of the old law for the purpose of supporting the pre-existing right and really amounts to begging the question\nThe new proviso is wholly inapplicable in such a situation and the jurisdiction of the authority has to be exercised under the old law which so continues to exist\nIn the first place the onerous condition may in a given case prevent the exercise of the right of appeal, for the assessee may not be in a position to find the necessary money in time. Further this argument cannot prevail in view of the decision of the Calcutta High Court in Nagendra Nath Bose v. Mon Mohan Singha (supra). No cogent argument has been adduced before us to show that that decision is not correct. There can be no doubt that the new requirement touches the substantive right of appeal vested in the appellant\nNor can it be overlooked that such a requirement is calculated to interfere with or fetter, if not to impair or imperil, the substantive right. The right that the amended section gives is certainly less than the right which was available before. \n A provision which is calculated to deprive the appellant of the unfettered right of appeal cannot be regarded as a mere alteration in procedure. Indeed the new requirement cannot be said merely to regulate the exercise of the appellants pre-existing right but in truth whittles down the right itself and cannot be regarded as a mere rule of procedure.\nWhenever there is a proposition by one party and an opposition to that proposition by another a lis arises. \n It may be conceded, though not deciding it, that when the assessee files his return a lis may not immediately arise, for under section 11 (1) the authority may accept the return as correct and complete. But if the authority is not satisfied as to the correctness of the return and calls for evidence, surely a controversy arises involving a proposition by the assessee and an opposition by the State. The circumstance that the authority who raises the dispute is himself the judge can make no difference, for the authority raises the dispute in the interest of the State and in so acting only represents the State\nwill appear from the dates given above that in this case the lis in the sense explained above arose before the date of amendment of the section\nFurther, even if the lis is to be taken as arising only on the date of assessment, there was a possibility of such a lis arising as soon as proceedings started with the filing of the return or, at any rate, when the authority called for evidence and started the hearing and the right of appeal must be taken to have been in existence even at those dates. For the purposes of the accrual of the right of appeal the critical and relevant date is the date of initiation of the proceedings and not the decision itself.", + "expert_4": "On the 28th November, 1947, the appellant Hoosein Kasam Dada (India) Ltd., (hereinafter referred to as the assessee) submited to the Sales Tax Officer, Akola, a Sales Tax return in Form IV for the first quarter.\nNot being satisfied by the inspection of the account books as to the correctness of the return and being of opinion that the taxable turnover exceeded rupees two lacs the Sales Tax Officer submitted the case to the Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax, Amravati, for assessment, On the 25th January, 1949, the Assistant Commissioner issued a fresh notice in Form XI under section 11 and fixed the case for disposal on the 5th February, 1949.\nEventually after various further proceedings the Assistant Commissioner on the 8th April, 1950, assessed the assessee, to the best of his judgment, in the sum of Rs. 58,657140 and a copy of the order in Form XIV was sent to the assessee.\nThe appeal not having been accompanied by any proof of the payment of the tax in respect of which the appeal had been preferred, the authorities, after giving the assessee several adjournments, declined to admit the appeal.\nThe assessee moved the Board of Revenue, Madhya Pradesh, by a revision application against the order of the Sales Tax Commissioner contending that his appeal was not governed by the proviso to section 22(l) of the Act as amended on the 25th November, 1949, by the Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax (Second Amendment) Act (Act LVII of 1949) but was governed by the proviso to section 22(l) of the Act as it stood when the assessment proceedings were started, i.e., before the said amendment.\nThe Board of Revenue took the view that as the order of assessment was made after the amendment of the section and the appeal was filed thereafter such appeal must be governed by the provisions of law as it existed at the time the appeal was actually filed and that the law as it existed before the filing of the appeal could not apply to the case. The assessee thereupon moved the High Court of Madhya Pradesh under articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying, amongst other things, for a writ of mandamus or an appropriate order directing the Sales Tax Commissioner to admit and hear the appeal without demanding payment of the amount of sales tax assessed by the Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax.\nThis Court granted special leave to appeal, but such leave was, by the order granting such leave, limited to the question of the effect of the amendment to section 22 of the Act on the petitioners appeal to the Sales Tax Commissioner, Madhya Pradesh. This Court took the view that the other questions sought to be raised by the assessee would have to be decided by the Sales Tax Commissioner in case the appeal succeeded.\nThe appeal has now come up for final disposal before us and in this appeal we are concerned only with the limited question of the effect of the amendment to section 22 of the Act.\nThe relevant portion of section 22 as amended runs as follows-- 22. (1) Any dealer aggrieved by an order under this Act may, in the prescribed manner, appeal to the prescribed authority against the order Provided that no appeal against an order of assessment, with or without penalty shall be admitted by the said authority unless such appeal is accompanied by a satisfactory proof of the payment of the tax, with penalty, if any, in respect of which the appeal has been preferred.\nIt is clear from the language used in the proviso to section 22 (1) as it stood prior to the amendment that an aggrieved assessee had only to pay such amount of tax as he might admit to be due from him, whereas under the proviso to section 22(l) as amended the appeal has to be accompanied by satisfactory proof of payment of the tax in respect of which the appeal had been preferred.\nThe contention of the present assessee is that as the amendment has not been made retrospective its right of appeal under the original section 22(l) remains unaffected and that accordingly as it does not admit anything to be due it was not liable to deposit any sum along with its appeal and the Commissioner was bound to admit its appeal and had no jurisdiction or power to reject it on the ground that it had not been accompanied by any proof of payment of the tax assessed against the appellant as required under the amended proviso and the Board of Revenue and the High Court were in error in not directing the Commissioner to admit the appeal. \nThat the amendment has placed a substantial restriction on the assessees right of appeal cannot be disputed, for the amended section requires the payment of the entire assessed amount as a condition precedent to the admission of its appeal.\nThe question is whether the imposition of such a restriction by amendment of the section can affect the assessees right of appeal from a decision in proceedings which commenced prior to such amendment and which right of appeal was free from such restriction under the section asit stood at the time of the commencement of the proceedings.\nJudicial Committee in Colonial. Sugar Refining Co., Ltd. v. Irving(1).\nAnd therefore the only question is, was the appeal to His Majesty in Council a right vested in the appellants at the date of the passing of the Act, or was it a mere matter of procedure ?\nIt seems to their Lordships that the question does not admit of doubt. To deprive a suitor in a pending action of an appeal to a superior tribunal which belonged to him as of right is a very different thing from regulating procedure. In princi- ple, their Lordships see no difference between abolishing an appeal altogether and transferring the appeal to a new tribunal. In either case there is an interference with existing rights contrary to the well-known general principle that statutes are not to be held to act retrospectively unless a clear intention to that effect is manifested.\nNana bin Aba v. Sheku bin Andu (1) and by the Privy Council itself in Delhi Cloth and General Mills Co. Ltd. v. Income-tax Commissioner, Delhi().\nKirpa Singh v. Rasaldar Ajaipal Singh (3).\nIt was there regarded as settled that the right of appeal was not a mere matter of procedure but was a vested right which inhered in a party from the com mencement of the action in the Court of first instance and such right could not be taken away except by an express provision or by necessary implication.\nSardar Ali v. Dalimuddin (4)\nThe apppllants claimed that on the 7th October, 1920, when the suit was filed they had vested in them by the existing law a substantive right to a Letters Patent appeal from the decision of a Single Judge and that an intention to interfere with it, to clog it with a new condition or to impair or imperil it could not be presumed unless it was clearly manifested by express words or necessary intendment.\nIn giving effect to the contentions of the appellants Rankin C.J. observed at p. 518- Now, the reasoning of the Judicial Committee in The Colonial Sugar Refining Companys case is a conclusive authority to show that rights of appeal are not matters of procedure, and that the right to enter the superior court is for the present purpose deemed to arise to a litigant before any decision has been given by the inferior court. If the latter proposition be accepted, I can see no intermediate point at which to resist the conclusion that the right arises at the date of the suit.\nIt was held that the new clause could not be given retrospective effect and accordingly the date of pre- sentation of the second appeal to the High Court was not the date which determined the applicability of the amended clause of the Letters Patent and that the date of the institution of the suit was the determining factor.\nAs against the last mentioned decision of the Calcutta High Court Sri Ganapathy Aiyar, appearing for the respondent, refers us to the decision of a Bench of the Bombay High Court in the case of Badruddin Abdul Rahim v. Sitaram Vinayak Apte (1), where it was held that the amendment of clause 15 of the Letters Patent operated retrospectively. That case followed an earlier decision of the same High Court in Fram Bomanji v. Hormasji Barjorji (2).\nThe decision in the old case proceeded upon two grounds, namely, (1) that the question was one of procedure and (2) that sec- (1) (1928) I.L R. 52 Bom. 753 A.I.R. (1928) Bom. 371. (2) (1866) Bom. H.C. (O.C.J.) 49. tion 2 of the New Letters Patent of 1865 gave retrospective operation to the Letters Patent by making it applicable to all pending suits\nIn so far as the first ground is concerned it clearly runs counter to the decision of the Privy Council in Colonial Sugar Refining Co. Ltd. v. Irving (supra) and must be taken as overruled as Fawcett J\nAs regards the second ground it is inapplicable to the case before us and it is not necessary to express any opinion as to the. soundness and validity of that ground. It may be mentioned here that in Shaikh Hasan Abdul Karim v. King Emperor (1) another Bench of the same High Court expressly dissented from the decision in Badruddin Abdul Rahim v. Sitaram Vinayak Apte (supra). \n The principle laid down in the Colonial Sugar Refining Co.s case (supra) was followed by a Special Bench of Madras in In re Vasudeva Samiar (2). A Full Bench of the Allahabad High Court in Ram Singha v. Shankar Dayal (3) fell into line and held that the earlier decision on this point of that Court in Zamin Ali Khan v. Genda (4) stood overruled by the Privy Council decision in the Colonial Sugar Refining Co.s case. A Full Bench of Nagpur High Court in Radhakisan v. Shridar (5 ) has also taken the same view. The Punjab High Court has also adopted the same line in Gordhan Das v. The Governor General in Council (1). The case of Nagendra Nath Bose v. Mon Mohan Singha Roy (7) is indeed very much to the point. In that case the plaintiffs instituted a suit for rent valued at Rs. 1,30615 and obtained a decree. In execution of that decree the defaulting tenure was sold on the 20th November, 1928, for Rs. 1,600. On the 19th December, 1928, an application was made, under Order XXI, rule 90 of the Code of Civil Procedure, by the present petitioner, who was one of the judgment-debtors, \n I.L.R (1945) Bom. 17. A I.R. (1929) Mad 381 56 M.L.J 369. (3) (1928) I.L.R. 50 All. 965 A.I.R. (1928) All. 437. (4) (1904) I.L.R. 26 All. 375. A.I.R. (1950) Nag. 177. A.I.R, (1952) Punjab 103 (F.B. ), (7) (1930) 34 C.W.N. 1009. for setting aside the sale.\nThe, above decisions quite firmly establish and our decisions in Janardan Reddy v. The State (1) and in Ganpat Rai v. Agarwal Chamber of Commerce Ltd. (2) uphold the principle that a right of appeal is not merely a matter of procedure. It is matter of substantive right.\nThis right of appeal from the decision of an .inferior tribunal to a superior tribunal becomes vested in a party when proceedings are first initiated in, and before a decision is given by, the inferior court.\nIn the language of Jenkins C.J. in Nana bin Aba v. Shaik bin Andu (supra) to disturb an existing right of appeal is not a mere alteration in procedure. Such a vested right cannot be taken away except by express enactment or necessary intendment. An intention to interfere with or to impair or imperil such a vested right cannot be presumed unless such intention be clearly manifested by express words or necessary implication.\nThe new proviso, it is pointed out, peremptorily requires the authority not to admit the appeal unless it be accompanied by a satisfactory proof of the payment of the tax in respect of which the appeal is preferred and this duty the authority must discharge at the time the appeal is actually preferred before him. The argument is that after the amendment the authority has no option in the matter and he has no jurisdiction to admit any appeal unless the assessed tax be deposited. It follows, therefore, by necessary implication, according to the learned Advocate, that the amended provision applies to an appeal from an assessment order made before the date of amendment as well as to an appeal from an order made after that date.\nA similar argument was urged before the Calcutta Special Bench in Sardar Ali v. Dalimuddin (supra), namely, that after the amendment the court had no authority to entertain an appeal without a certificate from the Single Judge. (1) 1950 S.C.R. 941. (2) (1952) S.C.J. 564. Rankin C.J. repelled this argument with the remark at page 520- Unless the contrary can be shown, the provision which takes away jurisdiction is itself subject to the implied saving of the litigants right.\nIn our view the above observation is apposite and applies to the case before us.\nThe true implication of the above observation as of the decisions in the other cases referred to above is that the pre-existing right of appeal is not destroyed by the amendment if the amendment is not made retrospective by express words or necessary intendment. The fact that the pre-existing right of appeal continues to exist must, in its turn, necessarily imply that the old law which created that right of appeal must also exist to support the continuation of that right. As the old law continues to exist for the purpose of supporting the pre- existing right of appeal that old law must govern the exercise and enforcement of that right of appeal and there can then be no question of the amended provision preventing the exercise of that right. The argument that the authority has no option or jurisdiction to admit the appeal unless it be accompanied by the deposit of the assessed tax as required by the amended proviso to section 22(1) of the Act overlooks the fact of existence of the old law for the purpose of supporting the pre-existing right and really amounts to begging the question. The new proviso is wholly inapplicable in such a situation and the jurisdiction of the authority has to be exercised under the old law which so continues to exist.\nThe learned Advocate urges that the requirment as to the deposit of the amount of the assessed costs does not affect the right of appeal itself which still remains intact, but only introduces a new matter of procedure. \n He contends that this case is quite different from the case of Sardar Ali v. Dalmuddin (supra), for in this case it is entirely in the power of the appellant to deposit the tax if he chooses to do so whereas it was not within the power of the appellant in that case to secure a certificate from the learned Single Judge who disposed of the second appeal. In the first place the onerous condition may in a given case prevent the exercise of the right of appeal, for the assessee may not be in a position to find the necessary money in time. Further this argument cannot prevail in view of the decision of the Calcutta High Court in Nagendra Nath Bose v. Mon Mohan Singha (supra). No cogent argument has been adduced before us to show that that decision is not correct.\nThere can be no doubt that the new requirement touches the substantive right of appeal vested in the appellant. Nor can it be overlooked that such a requirement is calculated to interfere with or fetter, if not to impair or imperil, the substantive right. The right that the amended section gives is certainly less than the right which was available before. \n A provision which is calculated to deprive the appellant of the unfettered right of appeal cannot be regarded as a mere alteration in procedure. Indeed the new requirement cannot be said merely to regulate the exercise of the appellants pre-existing right but in truth whittles down the right itself and cannot be regarded as a mere rule of procedure.\nFinally, Sri Ganapathy lyer faintly urges that until actual assessment there can be no lis and, therefore, no right of appeal can accrue before that event.\nThere are two answers to this plea. Whenever there is a proposition by one party and an opposition to that proposition by another a lis arises. \n It may be conceded, though not deciding it, that when the assessee files his return a lis may not immediately arise, for under section 11 (1) the authority may accept the return as correct and complete. But if the authority is not satisfied as to the correctness of the return and calls for evidence, surely a controversy arises involving a proposition by the assessee and an opposition by the State. The circumstance that the authority who raises the dispute is himself the judge can make no difference, for the authority raises the dispute in the interest of the State and in so acting only represents the State. \n It 1000 will appear from the dates given above that in this case the lis in the sense explained above arose before the date of amendment of the section. Further, even if the lis is to be taken as arising only on the date of assessment, there was a possibility of such a lis arising as soon as proceedings started with the filing of the return or, at any rate, when the authority called for evidence and started the hearing and the right of appeal must be taken to have been in existence even at those dates. For the purposes of the accrual of the right of appeal the critical and relevant date is the date of initiation of the proceedings and not the decision itself.", + "expert_5": "22. (1) Any dealer aggrieved by an order under this Act may, in the prescribed manner, appeal to the prescribed authority against the order Provided that no appeal against an order of assessment, with or without penalty, shall be entertained by the said authority unless it is satisfied that such amount of tax or penalty or both as the appellant may admit to be due from him, has been paid.\nIt is clear from the language used in the proviso to section 22 (1) as it stood prior to the amendment that an aggrieved assessee had only to pay such amount of tax as he might admit to be due from him, whereas under the proviso to section 22(l) as amended the appeal has to be accompanied by satisfactory proof of payment of the tax in respect of which the appeal had been preferred.\nThat the amendment has placed a substantial restriction on the assessees right of appeal cannot be disputed, for the amended section requires the payment of the entire assessed amount as a condition precedent to the admission of its appeal.\nThe question was answered in the negative by the Judicial Committee in Colonial. Sugar Refining Co., Ltd. v. Irving(1).\nif it be more than a matter of procedure, if it touches a right in existence at the passing of the Act,- it was conceded that, in accordance with a long line of authorities extending from the time of Lord Coke to the present day, the appellants would be entitled to succeed.\nTo deprive a suitor in a pending action of an appeal to a superior tribunal which belonged to him as of right is a very different thing from regulating procedure. In princi- ple, their Lordships see no difference between abolishing an appeal altogether and transferring the appeal to a new tribunal. In either case there is an interference with existing rights contrary to the well-known general principle that statutes are not to be held to act retrospectively unless a clear intention to that effect is manifested.\nThe principle of the above decision was applied by Jenkins \n J. in Nana bin Aba v. Sheku bin Andu (1) and by the Privy Council itself in Delhi Cloth and General Mills Co. Ltd. v. Income-tax Commissioner, Delhi().\nA Full Bench of the Lahore High Court adopted it in Kirpa Singh v. Rasaldar Ajaipal Singh (3).\nthe right of appeal was not a mere matter of procedure but was a vested right which inhered in a party from the com mencement of the action in the Court of first instance and such right could not be taken away except by an express provision or by necessary implication.\nSardar Ali v. Dalimuddin (4)\nNow, the reasoning of the Judicial Committee in The Colonial Sugar Refining Companys case is a conclusive authority to show that rights of appeal are not matters of procedure, and that the right to enter the superior court is for the present purpose deemed to arise to a litigant before any decision has been given by the inferior court.\nIt was held that the new clause could not be given retrospective effect and accordingly the date of pre- sentation of the second appeal to the High Court was not the date which determined the applicability of the amended clause of the Letters Patent and that the date of the institution of the suit was the determining factor.\nIn so far as the first ground is concerned it clearly runs counter to the decision of the Privy Council in Colonial Sugar Refining Co. Ltd. v. Irving (supra) and must be taken as overruled as Fawcett J. himself acknowledged at page 756.\nAs regards the second ground it is inapplicable to the case before us and it is not necessary to express any opinion as to the. soundness and validity of that ground.\nin Shaikh Hasan Abdul Karim v. King Emperor (1) another Bench of the same High Court expressly dissented from the decision in Badruddin Abdul Rahim v. Sitaram Vinayak Apte (supra).\nThe principle laid down in the Colonial Sugar Refining Co.s case (supra) was followed by a Special Bench of Madras in In re Vasudeva Samiar (2).\nA Full Bench of the Allahabad High Court in Ram Singha v. Shankar Dayal (3) fell into line and held that the earlier decision on this point of that Court in Zamin Ali Khan v. Genda (4) stood overruled by the Privy Council decision in the Colonial Sugar Refining Co.s case.\nA Full Bench of Nagpur High Court in Radhakisan v. Shridar (5 ) has also taken the same view.\nThe Punjab High Court has also adopted the same line in Gordhan Das v. The Governor General in Council (1).\nThe case of Nagendra Nath Bose v. Mon Mohan Singha Roy (7) is indeed very much to the point.\nThat a right of appeal is a substantive right cannot now be seriously disputed. It is not a mere matter of procedure.\nBy requiring such deposit as a condition precedent to the admission of the appeal, a new restriction has been put on the right of appeal, the, admission of which is now hedged in with a condition.\nThere can be no doubt that the right of appeal has been affected by the new provision and in the absence of an express enactment this amendment cannot apply to proceedings pending at the date when the new amendment came into force.\nthe date to be looked into for this purpose is the date of the original proceeding which eventually culminated in the appeal.\nThe, above decisions quite firmly establish and our decisions in Janardan Reddy v. The State (1) and in Ganpat Rai v. Agarwal Chamber of Commerce Ltd. (2) uphold the principle that a right of appeal is not merely a matter of procedure. It is matter of substantive right.\nThis right of appeal from the decision of an .inferior tribunal to a superior tribunal becomes vested in a party when proceedings are first initiated in, and before a decision is given by, the inferior court.\nIn the language of Jenkins C.J. in Nana bin Aba v. Shaik bin Andu (supra) to disturb an existing right of appeal is not a mere alteration in procedure.\nSuch a vested right cannot be taken away except by express enactment or necessary intendment.\nAn intention to interfere with or to impair or imperil such a vested right cannot be presumed unless such intention be clearly manifested by express words or necessary implication.\nA similar argument was urged before the Calcutta Special Bench in Sardar Ali v. Dalimuddin (supra), namely, that after the amendment the court had no authority to entertain an appeal without a certificate from the Single Judge. (1) 1950 S.C.R. 941. (2) (1952) S.C.J. 564. Rankin C.J. repelled this argument with the remark at page 520- Unless the contrary can be shown, the provision which takes away jurisdiction is itself subject to the implied saving of the litigants right.\nIn our view the above observation is apposite and applies to the case before us.\nthe pre-existing right of appeal is not destroyed by the amendment if the amendment is not made retrospective by express words or necessary intendment.\nThe fact that the pre-existing right of appeal continues to exist must, in its turn, necessarily imply that the old law which created that right of appeal must also exist to support the continuation of that right.\nAs the old law continues to exist for the purpose of supporting the pre- existing right of appeal that old law must govern the exercise and enforcement of that right of appeal and there can then be no question of the amended provision preventing the exercise of that right.\nThe new proviso is wholly inapplicable in such a situation and the jurisdiction of the authority has to be exercised under the old law which so continues to exist.\nIn the first place the onerous condition may in a given case prevent the exercise of the right of appeal, for the assessee may not be in a position to find the necessary money in time.\nFurther this argument cannot prevail in view of the decision of the Calcutta High Court in Nagendra Nath Bose v. Mon Mohan Singha (supra).\nNo cogent argument has been adduced before us to show that that decision is not correct.\nThere can be no doubt that the new requirement touches the substantive right of appeal vested in the appellant.\nNor can it be overlooked that such a requirement is calculated to interfere with or fetter, if not to impair or imperil, the substantive right.\nThe right that the amended section gives is certainly less than the right which was available before.\nA provision which is calculated to deprive the appellant of the unfettered right of appeal cannot be regarded as a mere alteration in procedure.\nIndeed the new requirement cannot be said merely to regulate the exercise of the appellants pre-existing right but in truth whittles down the right itself and cannot be regarded as a mere rule of procedure.\nWhenever there is a proposition by one party and an opposition to that proposition by another a lis arises. \n It may be conceded, though not deciding it, that when the assessee files his return a lis may not immediately arise, for under section 11 (1) the authority may accept the return as correct and complete. But if the authority is not satisfied as to the correctness of the return and calls for evidence, surely a controversy arises involving a proposition by the assessee and an opposition by the State. The circumstance that the authority who raises the dispute is himself the judge can make no difference, for the authority raises the dispute in the interest of the State and in so acting only represents the State.\nIt 1000 will appear from the dates given above that in this case the lis in the sense explained above arose before the date of amendment of the section. Further, even if the lis is to be taken as arising only on the date of assessment, there was a possibility of such a lis arising as soon as proceedings started with the filing of the return or, at any rate, when the authority called for evidence and started the hearing and the right of appeal must be taken to have been in existence even at those dates\nFor the purposes of the accrual of the right of appeal the critical and relevant date is the date of initiation of the proceedings and not the decision itself." + }, + "1953_26": { + "expert_1": "This is an appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay declaring the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1952, (Act XXIV of 1952), ultra vires the State Legislature and issuing a writ in the nature of mandamus against the State of Bombay and the Collector of Sales Tax, Bombay, appellants herein, directing them to forbear and desist from enforcing the provisions of the said Act against the respondents who are dealers in motor cars in Bombay. \n The Legislature of the State of Bombay enacted the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1952, (hereinafter referred to as ,the Act) and it was brought into force on October 9, 1952, by notification issued under section 1 (3) of the Act, except sections 5, 9, 10 and 47 which came into operation on November 1, 1952, as notified under section 2 (3). On, the same day the rules made by the State Government in exercise of the power conferred by section 45 of the Act also came into force. 1075 On November 3, 1952, the respondents 1 to 6, who are companies incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1913, and respondent No. 7, a partnership firm, all of whom are carrying on business in Bombay of buying and selling motor cars, presented a petition to the High Court under article 226 of the Constitution challenging the validity of the Act on the ground that it is ultra vires the State Legislature, inasmuch as it purported to tax sales arid purchases of goods regardless of the restrictions imposed on State legislative power by article 286 of the Constitution. It was also alleged that the provisions of the Act were discriminatory in their effect and, therefore, void under article 14 read with article 13 of the Constitution. The respondents accordingly prayed for the issue of a writ in the nature of mandamus against the appellants preventing them from enforcing the provisions of the Act against the respondents. \n A further ground of attack was added by amendment of the petition to the effect that the Act being wholly ultra vires and void, the provisions requiring dealers to apply for registration in some cases and to obtain a licence in some others as a condition of carrying on their business, infringed the fundamental rights of the respondents under article 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution. In the affidavit filed in answer the appellants traversed the allegations in the petition and contended, inter alia, that the Act was a complete code and provided for special machinery for dealing with all questions arising under it, including questions of constitutionality, and, therefore, the petition was not maintainable, that the present ease was not an appropriate one for the issue of a writ under article 226 as the validity of the imposition of a tax was questioned, that no assessment proceedings having been initiated against the respondents and no demand notice having been issued, the respondents had no cause of action, and that, properly construed, the Act and the Rules did not contravene article 286 or any other provisions of the Constitution and did not infringe any fundamental right of the respondents\noverruled the preliminary objection disdistinguishing the decisions cited in support thereof by pointing out that the principle that a court would not issue a prerogative writ when an adequate alternative remedy was available could not apply where, as here, a party came to the court with an allegation that his fundamental rights had been infringed and sought relief under article 226. \n The learned Judges however thought, in view of the conclusion they had come to on the question of competency of the State Legislature to pass the Act, it was not necessary to consider the challenge that has been made to the Act under articles 14 and 19 and expressed no opinion on the alleged infringement of the respondents fundamental rights. On the merits, the learned Judges held that the definition of sale in the Act was so wide as to include the three categories of sale exempted by article 286 from the imposition of sales tax by the States, and, as the definition governed the charging sections 5 and 10, the Act must be taken to impose the tax on such sales also in contravention of article 286. The Act must, therefore, be declared wholly void, it being impossible to sever any specific offending provision so as to save the rest of the Act, as the definition pervades the whole Act and the whole scheme of the Act is bound up with the definition of sale. The learned Judges rejected the argument that the Act and the Rules must be read together to see whether the State has made a law imposing a tax in contravention of article 286, remarking that if the Act itself is bad,, the rules, made under it cannot have any greater efficacy. Nor was the Government, which was authorised to make rules for carrying out the purpose of the Act, under an obligation to exclude the exempted sales. The rules, too, did not exclude all the three categories of exempted sales but only two of them, and even such exclusion was hedged\nThe Advocate-General of Bombay, appearing on behalf of the appellants, took strong exception to the manner in which the learned Judges below disposed of the objection to the maintainability of the petition. He complained that, having entertained the petition on the ground that infringement of fundamental rights was alleged, and that the remedy under article 226 was, therefore, appropriate, the learned Judges issued a writ without finding that any fundamental right had in fact been infringed. Learned counsel for the State of West Bengal also represented that parties in that State frequently got petitions under article 226 admitted by alleging violation of some fundamental right, and the court sometimes issued the writ asked for without insisting on the allegation being substantiated.\nWe are of opinion that it is always desirable, when relief under article 226 is sought on allegations of infringement of fundamental rights, that the court should satisfy itself that such allegations are well founded before proceeding further with the matter. In the present case, however, the appellants can have no grievance, as the respondents allegation of infringement of their fundamental right under article 19 (1) (g) was based on their contention that the Act was ultra vires the State Legislature, and that contention having been accepted, by the Court below, there would clearly be an unauthorised restriction on the respondents right to carry on their trade, registration and licence being required only to facilitate collection of the tax imposed. \n As Mr. Seervai for the respondents rightly submitted, the fact that the Court below left the question undecided, though the point was concluded by the 1078 decision of this Court in Mohammad Yasin v. The Town Area Committee, Jalalbad (1), which was brought to the notice of the learned Judges, was not the fault of the respondents and gave no real cause for complaint.\nBefore considering whether the appellant State has made a law imposing, or authorising the imposition of, a tax on sales or purchases of goods in disregard of constitutional restrictions on its legislative power in that behalf, it is necessary to ascertain the scope of such power and the nature and extent of the restrictions placed upon it by article 286. The power is conferred by article 246 (3) read with entry 54 of List 11 of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution. The Legislature of any State has, under these provisions, the exclusive power to make laws for such State or any part thereof with respect to taxes on the sale or purchase of goods other than newspapers. The expression for such State or any part thereof cannot, in our view, be taken to import into entry 54 the restriction that the sale or purchase referred to must take place within the territory of that State. All that it means is that the laws which a State is empowered to make must be for the purposes of that State. \n As pointed out by the Privy Council in the Wallace Brothers case (2) in dealing with the competency of the Indian Legislature to impose tax on the income arising abroad to a non-resident foreign company, the constitutional validity of the relevant statutory provisions did not turn on the possession by the legislature of extra-territorial powers but on the existence of a sufficient territorial connection between the taxing State and what it seeks to tax. In the case of sales-tax it is not necessary that the sale or purchase should take place within the territorial limits of the State in the sense that all the ingredients of a sale like the agreement to sell, the passing of title, delivery of the goods, etc., should have a territorial connection with the State. Broadly speaking, local activities of buying or selling carried on in the State in relation to local goods would be a sufficient basis to sustain the taxing power of the State, provided of course, such (1) 1952 S.C.R. 572. (2) 1948 S.C.R. I 1079 activities ultimately resulted in a concluded sale or purchase to be taxed.\nIn exercise of the legislative power conferred upon them in substantially similar terms by the Government of India Act, 1935, the Provincial Legislatures enacted sales-tax laws for their respective Provinces, acting on the principle of territorial nexus referred to above that is to say, they picked out one or more of the ingredients constituting a sale and made them the basis of their sales-tax legislation. Assam and Bengal made among other things the actual existence of the goods in the Province at the time of the contract of sale the test of taxability. \n In Bihar the pro- duction or manufacture of the goods in the Province was made an additional ground. A net of the widest range perhaps was laid in Central Provinces and Bert where it was sufficient if the goods were actually found in the Province at any time after the contract of sale or purchase in respect thereof was made. Whether the territorial nexus put forward as the basis of the taxing power in each case would be sustained as sufficient was a matter of doubt not having been tested in a court of law. And such claims to taxing power led to multiple taxation of the same transaction by different Provinces and cumulation of the burden falling ultimately on the consuming public. This situation posed to the Constitution makers the problem of restricting the taxing power on sales or purchases involving inter-State elements, and alleviating the tax burden on the consumer. At the same time they were evidently anxious to maintain the State power of imposing non-discriminatory taxes on goods imported from other States, while upholding the economic unity of India by providing for the freedom of inter-State trade and commerce. In their attempt to harmonise and achieve these somewhat conflicting objectives they enacted articles 286, 301 an 304.\nIt will be seen that the principle of freedom of inter- State trade and commerce declared in article 301 is expressly subordinated to the State power of taxing goods imported from sister States, provided only no discrimination is made in favour of similar goods of local origin. Thus the States in India have full power of imposing what in American State legislation is -called the use tax, gross receipts tax, etc. not to speak of the familiar property tax, subject only to the condition that such tax is imposed on all goods of the same kind produced or manufactured in the taxing State, although such taxation is undoubtedly calculated to fetter inter-State trade and commerce. In other words, the commercial unity of India is made to give way before the State-power of imposing any non-dis- criminatory tax on goods imported from sister States.\nHaving thus provided for the freedom of inter-State trade and commerce subject to the important qualification mentioned above, the authors of the Constitution had to devise a formula of restrictions to be imposed on the State- power of taxing sales or purchases involving inter-State elements which would avoid the doubts and difficulties arising out of the imposition of sales-tax on the same transaction by several Provincial Legislatures in the country before the commencement of the Constitution. This they did by enacting clause (1) (a) with the Explanation and clause (2) of article 286. Clause (1) (a) prohibits the taxation of all sales or purchases which take place outside the State, 1082 but a localised sale is a troublesome concept, for, a sale is a composite transaction involving as it does several elements such as agreement to sell, transfer of ownership, payment of the price, delivery of the goods and. so forth, which may take place at different places. How, then, is it to be determined whether a particular sale or purchase took place within or outside the State ? \n It is difficult to say that any one of the ingredients mentioned above is more essential to a sale or purchase than the others. To solve the difficulty an easily applicable test for determining what is an outside sale had to be formulated, and that is what, in our opinion, the Explanation was intended to do. It provides by means of a legal fiction that the State in which the goods sold or purchased are actually delivered for consumption therein is the State in which the sale or purchase is to be considered to have taken place, notwithstanding the property in such goods passed in another State. Why an outside sale or purchase is explained by defining what is an inside sale, and why actual delivery and consumption in the State are made the determining factors in locating a sale or purchase will presently appear. The test of sufficient territorial nexus was thus replaced by a simpler and more easily workable test Are the goods actually delivered in the taxing State, as a direct result of a sale or purchase, for the purpose of consumption therein ? Then, such sale or purchase shall be deemed to have taken place in that State and outside all other States. The latter States are prohibited from taxing the sale or purchase the former alone is left free to do so. Multiple taxation of the same transaction by different States is also thus avoided. It is, however, argued on behalf of Bombay that the Explanation does not say that the State of delivery is the only State in which the sale or purchase shall be deemed to have taken place. \n If that was the intention, it would have been easy to say so. On the other hand, the non-obstante clause in the Explanation is said to indicate that, apart from cases covered by the legal fiction, the passing of property in the goods is to determine the place of sale. Thus, both the State of delivery 1083 and the State in which the property in the goods sold passes are, it is claimed, empowered to tax.\nWe are unable to accept this view. It is really not necessary in the context to use the word only in the way suggested, for, when the Explanation says that a sale or purchase shall be deemed to have taken place in a particular State, it follows that it shall be deemed also to have taken place outside the other States. Nor can the non-obstante clause be understood as implying that, under the general law relating to the sale of goods, the passing of the property in the goods is the determining factor in locating a sale or purchase. Neither the Sale of Goods Act nor the common law relating to the sale of goods has anything to say as to what the situs of a sale is, though certain rules have been laid down for ascertaining the intention of the contracting parties as to when or under what conditions the property in the goods is to pass to the buyer. \n That question often raises ticklish problems for lawyers and courts, and to make the passing of title the determining factor in the location of a sale or purchase would be to replace old uncertainties and difficulties connected with the nexus basis with new ones. Nor would the hardship of multiple taxation be obviated if two States were still free to impose tax on the same tran- saction. In our opinion, the non-obstante clause was inserted in the Explanation simply with a view to make it clear beyond all possible doubt that it was immaterial where the property in the goods passed, as it might otherwise be regarded as indicative of the place of sale. It is also to be noted in this connection that, on the construction suggested by the Advocate-General of Bombay, namely, that the Explanation was not intended to deprive the State in which the property in the goods passed of its taxing power, but only to exclude the sales or purchases of the kind described in the Explanation from the operation of clause (1) (a) which prohibits taxation of outside sales or purchases, the Explanation would operate, not as an explanation, but as an exception or a proviso to that clause. It 1084 may be that the description of a provision cannot be decisive of its true meaning or interpretation which must depend on the words used therein, but, when two interpretations are sought to be put upon a provision, that which fits the description which the legislature has chosen to apply to it is, according to sound canons of construction, to be adopted provided, of course, it is consistent with the language employed, in preference to the one which attributes to the provision a different effect from what it should have according to its description by the legislature.\nWe see no force in this objection. It is to be noted that the Explanation does not say that the consumption should be by the purchaser himself. Nor do the words as a direct result have reference to consumption. They qualify actual delivery . \n The expression for the purpose of consumption in that State must, in our opinion, be understood as having reference not merely to the individual importer or purchaser but as contemplating distribution eventually to consumers in general within the State. Thus all buyers within the State of delivery from out-of-State sellers, except those buying for re-export out of the State, would be within the scope of-the Explanation and liable to be taxed by the State on their inter-State transactions. It should be remembered here that the Explanation deals only with interState sales. or purchases and not with purely local or domestic transactions. That these are subject to the taxing power of the State has never been questioned. We are therefore of opinion that article 286 (1) (a) read with the Explanation prohibits taxation of sales 1085 or purchases involving inter-State elements by all States except the State in which the goods are delivered for the purpose of consumption therein in the wider sense explained above. The latter State is left free to tax such sales or purchases, which power it derives not by virtue of the Explanation but under article 246 (3) read with entry 54 of List II.\nAs both the Explanation and clause (2) deal only with inter-State transactions, it may appear at first blush that whatever taxing power the Explanation may have reserved to the state of delivery is nullified by clause (2), at any rate until Parliament chooses to lift the ban under the power reserved to it by the opening words of clause (2). As one way of avoiding this result I it was suggested by the Advocate- Gneral of Bombay that the expression inter-State trade and commerce in clause (2) may be construed as meaning dealings between a trader in one State and a trader in another, so that the clause would be applicable only to sales or purchases in the course of dealings between such traders. The ban under clause (2) could not in that view, affect the taxability of a sale by a trader in one State to a consumer or user in another. We cannot agree with this restrictive interpretation of the expression inter-State trade and commerce. The sale by a trader in one State to a user in another would be a sale in the course of inter-State trade according to the natural meaning of those words, and we can see no reason for importing the restriction that the transaction should be one between two traders only. \n This is, however, not to say that the ban under clause (2) extends to the taxing power which the delivery State is left free, under the Explanation, to exercise. We are of opinion that the operation of clause (2) stands excluded as a result of the legal fiction enacted in the explanation, and the State in which the goods are actually delivered for consumption can impose tax on inter-State sales or purchases. The effect of the 1086 Explanation in regard to inter-State dealings is, in our view, to invest what, in truth, is an inter-State transac- tion with an intrastate character in relation to the State of delivery, and clause (2) can, therefore, have no application. It is true that the legal fiction is to operate for the purposes of sub-clause (a) of clause (1), but that means merely that the Explanation is designed to explain the meaning of the expression outside the State in clause (1) (a). When once, however, it is determined with the aid of the fictional test that a particular sale or purchase has taken place within the taxing State, it follows, as a corollary, that the transaction loses its inter-State character and falls outside the purview of clause (2), not because the definition in the Explanation is used for the purpose of clause (2), but because such sale or purchase becomes in the eye of the law a purely local transaction.\nIt is said that even though all the essential ingredients of a sale took place within one State and the sale was, in that sense, a purely intrastate transaction, it might involve transport of the goods across the State- boundary, and that would be sufficient to bring it within the scope of clause (2). We find it difficult to appreciate this argument. As already stated, the Explanation envisages sales or purchases under which out-of-State goods are imported into the State. That is the essential element which makes such a transaction inter-State in character, and if it is turned into an intrastate transaction by the operation of the legal fiction which blots out from view the inter-State element , it is not logical to say that the transaction, though now become local and domestic in the eye of the law, still retains its inter-State character. The statutory fiction completely masks the inter-State character of the sale or purchase which, as a collateral result of such making, falls outside the scope of clause (2). It is said that, on this view, clause (2) would become practically redundant, as clause (1) (a) read with the explanation as construed by us would itself preclude taxation by other States of inter-State sales or purchases of the kind referred to in the explanation. As 1087 We have already pointed out, the Explanation does not cover cases of inter-State sales or purchases under which the goods are imported into the State for reexport to other States and possibly other categories of sales or purchases which do not satisfy all the requirements of the explanation. Whether such transactions are sufficiently numerous for the Constitution to take note of is a matter of opinion and it cannot have much bearing on the question of construction. \n On the other hand there are, in our judgment, cogent considerations which tend to support the view we have expressed above that clause (2) was not intended to affect the power of the delivery State to tax inter-State sales or purchases of the kind mentioned in the Explanation. As we have seen, in our Constitution the principle of freedom of inter-State trade and commerce is made to give way before the State-power of imposing non-discriminatory taxes on goods imported from other States. Now, article 286(2) is but one phase of the protection accorded to interState trade and commerce from the fettering power of State taxation. \n As article 286 deals with restrictions on the power of the States to impose tax on the sale or purchase of goods, the Constitution makers evidently thought that it should contain also a specific provision safeguarding sales or purchases of an inter-State character against the taxing power of the States. It is however, reasonable to suppose that this particular form of protection to inter-State trade and commerce provided in article 286(2) was not intended to have a wider operation than what is contemplated in Part XIII which declares the general principle of freedom of inter-State commerce and defines the measure of constitutional protection it should enjoy. If such protection is intended to give way before the State-power of taxing goods imported from sister States, subject only to the condition against discrimination, it is legitimate to suppose that the ban under article 286(2) should not operate so as to nullify that power. True, article 304 (a) deals with the restrictions as to imposition of tax on goods, while article 1088 deals with the restrictions as to imposition of tax on sales or purchases of goods.\nBut this distinc tion loses its practical importance in the case of sales-tax imposed by the delivery State under the conditions mentioned in the Explanation, for, if we look behind the labels at the substance of the matter, it becomes clear that a tax on sales or purchases imposed by the State in which the goods are delivered for consumption, in the sense already explained, is, in economic effect practically indistinguishable from a tax on the consumption or use of the goods. The words in which the goods have actually been delivered ensure that the goods have come into the State, and the expression for the purpose of consumption in the State shows that, though the tax is formally laid on sales, its incidence is aimed at the consumers in the State.\nSince writers on political economy are agreed that taxes on the sale of commodities are simply taxes on the commodities themselves, it is possible to regard a tax on the retail sale of motor spirit -and lubricants as a tax on those commodities. Therefore, sales-tax, the incidence of which is really directed against the consumer, is, in substance, a tax on the goods imposed, no doubt, on the occasion of the sale as a taxable event.\nThe object clearly is to assimilate the conditions, under which the delivery State is left free to tax inter-State sales or purchases, to those under which a State is empowered to impose tax on goods imported into the State from other States under article 304 (a). If then, a non-discriminatory use or consumption tax imposed under (1) 1939 F.C.R. 18, 42. 1089 article 304 on goods imported from other States does not infringe the freedom of inter-State commerce declared by article 301, parity of reason and policy requires that a tax on sales or purchases imposed by the State in which the goods are actually delivered for consumption in the State should not be regarded as violative of the ban under article 286 (2), and that is what the statutory fiction enacted in the Explanation was, in our judgment, designed to achieve by divesting the sale or purchase of the kind referred. to in the Explanation of its inter-State character in relation to the State of delivery.\nThere is another important consideration which strongly supports the view we have indicated above, namely article 286 (2) does not affect the taxation of such sale or purchase by the State of delivery. If both the exporting State and the delivery State were entitled, notwithstanding article 286(2), to tax the inter-State sale or purchase, as suggested by the Advocate-General of Bombay, it would mean that the transaction is subjected to double taxation as compared with a sale by a local dealer which pays only one tax. It is precisely this type of discriminatory burden which the principle of freedom of inter-State commerce seeks to avoid, for, it places inter-State trade at a disadvantage in competition with local trade.\nIt is one thing to avoid impeding inter-State commerce by imposing discriminatory burdens upon it which internal trade does not have to bear, but quite another to place local products and local business at a disadvantage in competition with outside goods and dealers. It would be 1090 a curious perversion of the principle of freedom of inter-State commerce to drive local custom across the border to outside dealers, and that, in our opinion, could not have been contemplated. The view which we have expressed above avoids either anomaly and would place local trade and interstate trade on an equal footing.\nThe delivery State would tax both local and out-of-State goods equally without discrimination against either and that, we think, is the only measure of protection which article 286 could reasonably be supposed to accord to interState sales or purchases, when it is construed in the light of articles 301 and 304.\nThe question next arises as to whether the, Act contravenes all or any of the restrictions imposed by article 286. It is the respondents case that the sales and purchases made by them in Bombay, in the course of their business, include all the three categories excluded from the scope of State- taxation by article 286, and the Act seeking to bring all of them within its scheme of taxation is bad.\nIt is to be noted that these are the excluded categories of sales or purchases under article 286 (1) (b) and (2) respectively.\nNow, it will be seen from the provisions summarised above that the Act does not in terms exclude from its purview the sales or purchases taking place outside the State of Bombay while it does include, by Explanation (2) to the definition of sale, the sales or purchases under which the delivery and consumption take place in Bombay which, by virtue of the Explanation to article 286(1)(a), are to be regarded as local 1094 sales or purchases. On the construction we have placed upon that Explanation, sales or purchases effected in Bombay in respect of goods in Bombay but delivered for consumption outside Bombay are not taxable in Bombay.\nThe charging sections cannot, therefore, be taken to cover the class of sales or purchases which, on our construction of the Explanation, are to be regarded as taking place outside the State of Bombay. \n We see no force, therefore, in the argument that the Act contravenes the provisions of article 286(1)(a) by purporting to charge sales or purchases excluded by that article from State- taxation.\nThe argument is not without force, and it must be held that rule 5(2)(1) is ultra vires the rule-making authority and therefore void. But it is clearly severable from rule 5(1)(1). The restriction regarding the mode of transport of the goods sold or purchased in the course of inter-State trade, to which alone sub-rule (2)(1) relates, can be ignored and the exemption under rule 5(1)(1) may well be allowed to stand.\nEach State must, in imposing a tax of this nature, fix its own limits below which it does not consider it administratively feasible or worthwhile to impose the tax. It is idle to suggest that any discrimination is involved in such classification.\nThe majority of the Federal Court appear to have contemplated another form of severability, namely, by a classification of the particular cases on which the impugned Act may happen to operate, involving an inquiry into the circumstances of each individual case. \n There are no words in the Act capable of being so construed, and such a course would in effect involve an amendment of the Act by the court, a course which is beyond the competency of the court, as has long been well established. The subject of the constitutional prohibition was single and indivisible, namely, disposition of property on grounds only of (among other things) descent and if, in its actual operation, the impugned statute was found to transgress the constitutional mandate, the whole Act had to be held void as the words used (1) 1946 F.C.R. 1. (2) 1942 F.C.R. 67. 1099 covered both what was constitutionally permissible and what was not. The same principle was applied by this court in the Cross Roads case(1). It was, indeed, applied also in Bowmans case(1) with respect to the licence tax imposed generally on the entire business conducted including inter- State commerce as well as domestic business, but was not applied, as stated above, with respect to excise tax which was laid on every gallon of gasolene sold and was thus divisible in its nature. It is a sound rule to extend severability to include separability in enforcement in such cases, and we are of opinion that the principle should be applied in dealing with taxing statutes in this country, We accordingly set aside the declaration made by the court below and quash the writ issued by it except in regard to rule 5 (2) (1).\nAn injunction shall, however, issue restraining the appellants from imposing or authorising the imposition of a tax on sales and purchases which are exempted from taxation by article 286 as interpreted above. Each party will bear its own costs throughout.", + "expert_2": "This is an appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay declaring the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1952, (Act XXIV of 1952), ultra vires the State Legislature and issuing a writ in the nature of mandamus against the State of Bombay and the Collector of Sales Tax, Bombay, appellants herein, directing them to forbear and desist from enforcing the provisions of the said Act against the respondents who are dealers in motor cars in Bombay.\na petition to the High Court under article 226 of the Constitution challenging the validity of the Act on the ground that it is ultra vires the State Legislature, inasmuch as it purported to tax sales arid purchases of goods regardless of the restrictions imposed on State legislative power by article 286 of the Constitution. It was also alleged that the provisions of the Act were discriminatory in their effect and, therefore, void under article 14 read with article 13 of the Constitution.\nthe Act being wholly ultra vires and void, the provisions requiring dealers to apply for registration in some cases and to obtain a licence in some others as a condition of carrying on their business, infringed the fundamental rights of the respondents under article 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution.\nIn the present case, however, the appellants can have no grievance, as the respondents allegation of infringement of their fundamental right under article 19 (1) (g) was based on their contention that the Act was ultra vires the State Legislature, and that contention having been accepted, by the Court below, there would clearly be an unauthorised restriction on the respondents right to carry on their trade, registration and licence being required only to facilitate collection of the tax imposed. \n As Mr. Seervai for the respondents rightly submitted, the fact that the Court below left the question undecided, though the point was concluded by the 1078 decision of this Court in Mohammad Yasin v. The Town Area Committee, Jalalbad (1), which was brought to the notice of the learned Judges, was not the fault of the respondents and gave no real cause for complaint.\nThe expression for such State or any part thereof cannot, in our view, be taken to import into entry 54 the restriction that the sale or purchase referred to must take place within the territory of that State. All that it means is that the laws which a State is empowered to make must be for the purposes of that State.\nthe constitutional validity of the relevant statutory provisions did not turn on the possession by the legislature of extra-territorial powers but on the existence of a sufficient territorial connection between the taxing State and what it seeks to tax.\nIt will be seen that the principle of freedom of inter- State trade and commerce declared in article 301 is expressly subordinated to the State power of taxing goods imported from sister States, provided only no discrimination is made in favour of similar goods of local origin. Thus the States in India have full power of imposing what in American State legislation is -called the use tax, gross receipts tax, etc. not to speak of the familiar property tax, subject only to the condition that such tax is imposed on all goods of the same kind produced or manufactured in the taxing State, although such taxation is undoubtedly calculated to fetter inter-State trade and commerce.\nthe Explanation was intended to do. It provides by means of a legal fiction that the State in which the goods sold or purchased are actually delivered for consumption therein is the State in which the sale or purchase is to be considered to have taken place, notwithstanding the property in such goods passed in another State.\nthe non-obstante clause was inserted in the Explanation simply with a view to make it clear beyond all possible doubt that it was immaterial where the property in the goods passed, as it might otherwise be regarded as indicative of the place of sale.\nThe expression for the purpose of consumption in that State must, in our opinion, be understood as having reference not merely to the individual importer or purchaser but as contemplating distribution eventually to consumers in general within the State. Thus all buyers within the State of delivery from out-of-State sellers, except those buying for re-export out of the State, would be within the scope of-the Explanation and liable to be taxed by the State on their inter-State transactions. It should be remembered here that the Explanation deals only with interState sales. or purchases and not with purely local or domestic transactions. That these are subject to the taxing power of the State has never been questioned. We are therefore of opinion that article 286 (1) (a) read with the Explanation prohibits taxation of sales 1085 or purchases involving inter-State elements by all States except the State in which the goods are delivered for the purpose of consumption therein in the wider sense explained above.\nthe Explanation envisages sales or purchases under which out-of-State goods are imported into the State. That is the essential element which makes such a transaction inter-State in character, and if it is turned into an intrastate transaction by the operation of the legal fiction which blots out from view the inter-State element , it is not logical to say that the transaction, though now become local and domestic in the eye of the law, still retains its inter-State character. The statutory fiction completely masks the inter-State character of the sale or purchase which, as a collateral result of such making, falls outside the scope of clause (2). It is said that, on this view, clause (2) would become practically redundant, as clause (1) (a) read with the explanation as construed by us would itself preclude taxation by other States of inter-State sales or purchases of the kind referred to in the explanation.\nAs article 286 deals with restrictions on the power of the States to impose tax on the sale or purchase of goods, the Constitution makers evidently thought that it should contain also a specific provision safeguarding sales or purchases of an inter-State character against the taxing power of the States. It is however, reasonable to suppose that this particular form of protection to inter-State trade and commerce provided in article 286(2) was not intended to have a wider operation than what is contemplated in Part XIII which declares the general principle of freedom of inter-State commerce and defines the measure of constitutional protection it should enjoy. If such protection is intended to give way before the State-power of taxing goods imported from sister States, subject only to the condition against discrimination, it is legitimate to suppose that the ban under article 286(2) should not operate so as to nullify that power. True, article 304 (a) deals with the restrictions as to imposition of tax on goods, while article 1088 deals with the restrictions as to imposition of tax on sales or purchases of goods. But this distinc tion loses its practical importance in the case of sales-tax imposed by the delivery State under the conditions mentioned in the Explanation, for, if we look behind the labels at the substance of the matter, it becomes clear that a tax on sales or purchases imposed by the State in which the goods are delivered for consumption, in the sense already explained, is, in economic effect practically indistinguishable from a tax on the consumption or use of the goods.\nsales-tax, the incidence of which is really directed against the consumer, is, in substance, a tax on the goods imposed, no doubt, on the occasion of the sale as a taxable event. \n It will now be seen why the Explanation insists on actual delivery of the goods in the State and their consumption in the State, and why an outside sale or purchase is explained by defining what is an inside sale. The object clearly is to assimilate the conditions, under which the delivery State is left free to tax inter-State sales or purchases, to those under which a State is empowered to impose tax on goods imported into the State from other States under article 304 (a).\nIf then, a non-discriminatory use or consumption tax imposed under (1) 1939 F.C.R. 18, 42. 1089 article 304 on goods imported from other States does not infringe the freedom of inter-State commerce declared by article 301, parity of reason and policy requires that a tax on sales or purchases imposed by the State in which the goods are actually delivered for consumption in the State should not be regarded as violative of the ban under article 286 (2), and that is what the statutory fiction enacted in the Explanation was, in our judgment, designed to achieve by divesting the sale or purchase of the kind referred. to in the Explanation of its inter-State character in relation to the State of delivery.\nIt is the respondents case that the sales and purchases made by them in Bombay, in the course of their business, include all the three categories excluded from the scope of State- taxation by article 286, and the Act seeking to bring all of them within its scheme of taxation is bad.\nthe construction we have placed upon that Explanation, sales or purchases effected in Bombay in respect of goods in Bombay but delivered for consumption outside Bombay are not taxable in Bombay. \n Now, the respondents complain that the latter category of sales or purchases thus held not to be taxable are not expressly excluded by the Act which, therefore, contravenes article 286 (1)(a). No doubt, there is no provision in the Act excluding in express terms sales of the kind referred to above, but neither is there any provision purporting to impose tax on such sales or purchases. On the other hand, the two charging sections of the Act, section 5 and section 10, purport, in express terms, to impose the tax on all sales made within the State of Bombay, and section 18, which lays the tax on purchases, is limited in its operation to purchases of goods delivered to a buyer in the State of Bombay for consumption therein, that is to say, to purchases which unquestionably are taxable by Bombay according to both parties. The charging sections cannot, therefore, be taken to cover the class of sales or purchases which, on our construction of the Explanation, are to be regarded as taking place outside the State of Bombay.\nBut, as pointed out already, rules 5 and 6, which deal respectively with deduction of certain sales in calculating the taxable turnover under sections 7 and 11 exclude these two categories in express terms, and these rules were brought into force simultaneously with the charging sections 5 and 10 on November 1, 1952. \n The position, therefore, was that, on the date -when the general tax and the special tax became leviable under the Act, sales or purchases of the kind described under article 286(1) (b) and (2) stood in fact excluded from taxation, and the State of 1095 Bombay cannot be considered to have made a law imposing or authorising the imposition of a tax on sales or purchases excluded under the aforesaid clauses of article 286.\nBut, as already stated, that is not the position here, and the learned Judges below fell into an error by overlooking this crucial fact when they say If the Legislature had no competence on the date the law was passed, the rules subsequently framed cannot confer competence on the Legislature.\nSeervai attempted to make out that the provisions of the charging sections 5 and 10 fixing Rs. 30,000 and Rs. 5,000 as the minimum taxable turnover for general tax and special tax respectively were discriminatory and void under article 14 read with article 13 of the Constitution, and he gave us several tables of figures showing how the imposition of the tax actually works out in practice in hypothetical cases. \n It is unnecessary to go into. the details of these cases which have been worked out in figures, for it must be conceded that the general effect of fixing these minimum limits must necessarily be to enable traders whose taxable turnover is below those limits to sell their goods at lower prices to their customers than dealers whose turnover exceeded 1097 those limits, for the latter have to add the sales-tax to the prices of their goods. But no discrimination is involved in this classification which is perfectly reason-, able when it is borne in mind that the State may not consider it administratively worthwhile to tax sales by small traders who have no organisational facilities for collecting the tax from their buyers and turn it over to the Government.\nit was broadly contended before us that taxing statutes imposing tax on subjects divisible in their nature which do not exclude in express terms subjects exempted by the Constitution, should not, for that reason, be declared wholly ultra vires and void, for, in such cases, it is always feasible to separate taxes levied on authorised subjects from those levied on exempted subjects and to exclude the latter in the assessment of the tax.\non receipts from individual sales or purchases of goods effected during the accounting period, and it is therefore possible to separate at the assessment the receipts derived from exempted sales or purchases and allow the State to enforce the statute with respect to the constitutionally taxable subjects, it being assumed that the State intends naturally to keep what it could lawfully tax, even where it purports to authorize the taxation of what is constitutionally exempt. The principle, as it (1) 256 U.S. 642 65 L. Ed. 1098 is tersely put in the American case, is that severability in such cases includes separability in enforcement.\nIt is a sound rule to extend severability to include separability in enforcement in such cases, and we are of opinion that the principle should be applied in dealing with taxing statutes in this country, We accordingly set aside the declaration made by the court below and quash the writ issued by it except in regard to rule 5 (2) (1).\nIt is impossible to say that any of these ingredients is more essential than any other because the result is always the same the moment you take one away. There is then no sale. Therefore, one either has to adopt the ultra logical view and hold that the only State which can tax is the one in which all the ingredients take place and that no State can tax when a single ingredient 1102 takes place elsewhere, or resort to the old view and hold that every State in which any single ingredient -takes place can tax. The only alternative to these extremes is to make an arbitrary selection or to introduce a fiction. \n The Constitution chose the latter course and enacted the Explanation. I have deemed it proper to refer to the then existing practice regarding taxation because in construing a statute it is legitimate to take into account existting laws and the manner in which they were acted upon and enforced.\nI find it difficult to see how,,, article 286(2) could ever come into effective play if article 304 is applied to sales and purchases which take place in the course of inter-State trade or commerce. -A I do not think the change in language, a tax on the sale or purchase of any goods in the one case and a tax on goods imported from other States was accidental, nor do I think we will be justified in ignoring the fact that the two are placed in different parts of the Constitution. I therefore prefer to hold that articles 286 and 304 deal with different things and to construe article 286 without reference to 304.\nIn my opinion all it means is that there was a school of thought which regarded that as the crucial element on the nexus view and that the Constitution has negatived that idea. I am also unable to agree that the Explanation governs clause (2) of article 286, for it limits itself in express terms to sub-clause (a) of clause (1). It says that is an Explanation for the purposes of sub-clause (a). In view of that I do not feet justified in carrying it over to clause (2) and holding that it governs there as well. In my judgment, the only purpose of the 1104 Explanation is to explain where the situ8 of a sale is. clause (2) has a different object. Its purposes to prohibit taxation on sales and purchases which take place in the course of inter-State trade or commerce. If the Explanation is carried over to clause (2) it must, in my judgment, be equally applicable to subclause (b) of clause (1).\nThe-basic idea is to prohibit taxation in the case of inter-State trade and commerce unless and until the ban under clause (2) is lifted - and always in the case of exports and ,imports and when the ban is lifted, the Explanation is there to settle a matter of considerable controversy regarding the situs of a sale. It is true it makes an arbitrary selection but then almost any selection would have to be arbitrary and this is as good as any other.\nHow is the situs of a sale to be determined in the difficult class of cases which arose before the Constitution and which, in my view, occasioned the ban. \n My answer is that class of case can only arise in the course of inter-State trade and commerce, for the moment any one of the essential ingredients of a sale occurs in a State different from the taxing State and the goods are contracted to move across a boundary, you get a sale in the course of inter-State trade and commerce. Therefore, the problem about situs does not arise. Sales and purchases which are in truth and in fact intrastate (and the bulk of sales and purchases in the States are of that character) can of course be taxed. The ban does not apply and there is no need to call in aid the Explanation, for I repeat that the Explanation is limited to cases which in truth and in fact take place in the course of inter-State trade and commerce.\nThis is best understood by reference to a concrete case A, a dealer in Bombay, actually delivers goods to B, a dealer in Madras, for the purpose of sale by B, the Madras dealer, to purchasers C, D and E in Madras. Can either the sale by A to B or the purchase by B 1107 from A be taxed? In my view, it cannot, for B is in my judgment, as much a consumer as C, D and E.\nI would therefore construe consumption to mean the usual use made of an article for the purposes of trade and commerce. When dealer buys from dealer that is consumption 1108 for the purposes of the purchaser dealers trade when an ultimate purchaser buys from a retailer, that is also consumption for his purposes. Therefore, in my judgment, neither the sale by A to B in the illustration put nor the purchase by B from A can be taxed so long as the ban under clause (2) remains. But the sales by t to C, D and E can each be taxed by the State of Madras as they are intra-state sales. If this is found to work hardship on the States in practice, then Parliament, which has been given the power to regulate inter-State trade and commerce under Entry 42 of List 1, can step in and lift the ban. In that event, the Explanation comes into play and Madras can tax both transactions but Bombay cannot. On the other hand, if A, the Bombay dealer, sells direct to the consumers C, D and E in Madras and actually delivers the goods to them for the purpose of consumption in Madras, neither State can tax unless the ban is lifted, and then Madras alone will be able to tax.\nthe mere fact that a sale is made in the State (1) 1952 S.C.R. 1112, 1112 of Bombay will not prevent it from being a sale effected in the course of inter-state trade or commerce or in the course of export or import. \n Even when the whole transaction of sale is constituted in Bombay in the sense that every essential ingredient necessary to constitute a sale takes place there, (that is to say, even when the Explanation is not called into play), the sale would, given other considerations, be in the course of export or import or in the course of inter-State trade or commerce.\nOne is about severability and the other is whether a taxing statute is to be treated differently from other laws. On the question of severability, I cannot see how the good can be separated from the bad in this case even if the Explanation to section 2 (14) be expunged unless the Constitution be read as part of the Act and we are to read into the Act some such provision as follows Notwithstanding anything which is said in any part of this Act, all sales which the State is prohibited to tax under the Constitution are excluded from the scope of this Act.\nOffending provisions can be struck out but if we do that the whole Act goes because the defect here is that all sales are permitted to be taxed provided they are within the State of Bombay, and the rulemaking authority is not restricted to taxation which is constitutionally permissible.\nThese restrictions were threefold -(1) no tax could be imposed on the sale or purchase of goods where such sale or purchase took place outside the State, (2) no tax could be imposed on the sale or purchase of goods where such sale or purchase took place in the course of the import of goods into or the export of the goods out of the territory of India, and (3) no tax could be imposed on the sale or purchase of any goods where such sale or purchase took place in the course of inter-State trade or 1116 commerce except in so far as Parliament might by law otherwise provide.\nOnce the transfer of ownership or the passing of the property in the goods was accepted as the sole criterion of taxability it was not necessary at all to define what was a sale or purchase which took place 1117 inside the State. Whether a sale or purchase took place inside the State could be determined by applying the general law relating to the sale of goods and ascertaining where the transfer of ownership took place or the property in the goods passed. It was only when the transfer of ownership took place or the property in the goods passed that the sale or purchase was completed and the sale or purchase took place and the situs or the location of the sale or purchase was in the place where the transfer of ownership took place or the property in the goods passed under the general law relating to the sale of goods.\nThe situs or location of the sale or purchase therefore assumed an importance under article 286 and the Constitution makers had before them not only the legislative practice prevailing in the various States before the Constitution but also the concept of sale as defined in the Indian Sale of Goods Act. They therefore incorporated in article 286 the notion of a sale or purchase taking place, i.e., being completed, by the transfer of ownership or the passing of property in the goods under the general law relating to sale of goods and enacted that those sales or purchases which took place outside the State or which even though they took place inside the State took place in the course of the import or export or in the course of inter-State trade or commerce should come within the ban imposed therein. The Constitution makers however took count of the fact that even though the property in the goods by reason of the sale or purchase passed in a particular State the goods might as a direct result of such sale or purchase be delivered in another State for the purpose of consumption in that State. They wanted to give the delivery State in that event the power to tax such sale or purchase and therefore introduced by the Explanation to article 286 (1)(a) a legal fiction by which (1) 1898 A. C. 200. (2) 1906 A. C. 419. 1118 the sale or purchase in that event was deemed to have taken place in the delivery State.\nThis legal fiction was thus introduced not for defining what was a sale or purchase which took place inside the State as distinct from a sale or purchase which took place outside the State. The purpose of the enactment of the Explanation was not to provide a definition of a sale or purchase which took place inside the State.\nIt would be a more natural way of reading the non-obstante clause to read into it an intention to state what according to the Constitution makers was the basic idea of fixing the situs or the location of the sale or purchase in the place where the transfer of ownership took place or the property in the goods passed and to indicate that notwithstanding that fact a sale or purchase which fell within the category mentioned in the Explanation was none, the, less to be deemed to have taken place inside the delivery State. \n If the Explanation to article 286(1) (a) is construed in the manner indicated above it follows that notwithstanding the fact that under the general law relating to sale of goods the property in the goods has by reason of such sale or purchase passed in another State the sale shall be deemed to have taken place in the delivery State and the delivery State would be entitled to tax the sale or purchase. That does not however mean that it is only the delivery State which will be entitled to tax the sale or purchase.\nI do not accept the contention that the words for the purpose of consumption must be understood in a com- prehensive sense as having reference both to immediate and ultimate consumption within the State and excluding only resale out of the State. In my opinion they have reference only to immediate consumption within the State and no further. If the matters stood thus and there was no further provision to be considered the position would be that in a transaction of sale or purchase covered by the Explanation construed as above both the State in which the property in the goods passed and the delivery State would be entitled to tax such sale or purchase, the former by reason of the property in the goods having passed inside that State and the latter by reason of the goods having been delivered as a direct result of such sale or purchase for the purpose of consumption in that State.\nI would therefore base my, construction of the Explanation to article 286 (1)(a) and article 286 (2) on the rule as to the interpretation of statutes which I have referred to above, lifting the transaction of sale or purchase covered by the Explanation to article 286(1) (a) out of the category of the transactions in the course of inter-State trade or commerce and assimilating it to 1128 a transaction of sale or purchase which takes place inside the delivery State thus investing it with the character of an intrastate sale qua the delivery State. The result therefore is that the delivery State only would be entitled to tax the transaction of sale or purchase covered by the Explanation. Such transaction would be a transaction of sale or purchase where as a direct result of such sale or purchase the goods are delivered in the delivery State for the purpose of consumption in that State i.e., where the transaction is between a dealer in the State in which the property in the goods passes and a consumer in the delivery State. \n The State in which the property in the goods passes would not be able to tax such sale or purchase in the absence of a provision enacted by law by Parliament within the meaning of article 286(2). Once that ban is lifted by the appropriate legislation enacted by the Parliament the State in which the property in the goods passes would also be entitled to tax such sale or purchase but not otherwise.\nI agree that the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1952, and the rules made, thereunder except Rule 5(2)(1) do not contravene the provisions of article 286, that Rule 5(2)(1) is clearly severable and can be ignored, that there is no substance in the contention of Shri Seervai that there is a violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed under article 14 and that the taxation statutes should be construed in a manner so as to allow the statute itself to stand, the taxing authority being prevented by injunction from imposing the tax on subjects excluded by the Constitution from the purview of taxation by the State.", + "expert_3": "This is an appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay declaring the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1952, (Act XXIV of 1952), ultra vires the State Legislature and issuing a writ in the nature of mandamus against the State of Bombay and the Collector of Sales Tax, Bombay, appellants herein, directing them to forbear and desist from enforcing the provisions of the said Act against the respondents who are dealers in motor cars in Bombay\nThe Legislature of the State of Bombay enacted the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1952, (hereinafter referred to as ,the Act) and it was brought into force on October 9, 1952, by notification issued under section 1 (3) of the Act, except sections 5, 9, 10 and 47 which came into operation on November 1, 1952, as notified under section 2 (3). On, the same day the rules made by the State Government in exercise of the power conferred by section 45 of the Act also came into force. 1075 On November 3, 1952, the respondents 1 to 6, who are companies incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1913, and respondent No. 7, a partnership firm, all of whom are carrying on business in Bombay of buying and selling motor cars, presented a petition to the High Court under article 226 of the Constitution challenging the validity of the Act on the ground that it is ultra vires the State Legislature, inasmuch as it purported to tax sales arid purchases of goods regardless of the restrictions imposed on State legislative power by article 286 of the Constitution. It was also alleged that the provisions of the Act were discriminatory in their effect and, therefore, void under article 14 read with article 13 of the Constitution.\nThe respondents accordingly prayed for the issue of a writ in the nature of mandamus against the appellants preventing them from enforcing the provisions of the Act against the respondents. \n A further ground of attack was added by amendment of the petition to the effect that the Act being wholly ultra vires and void, the provisions requiring dealers to apply for registration in some cases and to obtain a licence in some others as a condition of carrying on their business, infringed the fundamental rights of the respondents under article 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution.\nIn the affidavit filed in answer the appellants traversed the allegations in the petition and contended, inter alia, that the Act was a complete code and provided for special machinery for dealing with all questions arising under it, including questions of constitutionality, and, therefore, the petition was not maintainable, that the present ease was not an appropriate one for the issue of a writ under article 226 as the validity of the imposition of a tax was questioned, that no assessment proceedings having been initiated against the respondents and no demand notice having been issued, the respondents had no cause of action, and that, properly construed, the Act and the Rules did not contravene article 286 or any other provisions of the Constitution and did not infringe any fundamental right of the respondents\nThe petition was heard by a Division Bench of the High Court consisting of Chagla C. J. and Dixit J. Chagla C. J., who delivered the judgment, Dixit J. concurring, overruled the preliminary objection disdistinguishing the decisions cited in support thereof by pointing out that the principle that a court would not issue a prerogative writ when an adequate alternative remedy was available could not apply where, as here, a party came to the court with an allegation that his fundamental rights had been infringed and sought relief under article 226. \n The learned Judges however thought, in view of the conclusion they had come to on the question of competency of the State Legislature to pass the Act, it was not necessary to consider the challenge that has been made to the Act under articles 14 and 19 and expressed no opinion on the alleged infringement of the respondents fundamental rights\nOn the merits, the learned Judges held that the definition of sale in the Act was so wide as to include the three categories of sale exempted by article 286 from the imposition of sales tax by the States, and, as the definition governed the charging sections 5 and 10, the Act must be taken to impose the tax on such sales also in contravention of article 286. The Act must, therefore, be declared wholly void, it being impossible to sever any specific offending provision so as to save the rest of the Act, as the definition pervades the whole Act and the whole scheme of the Act is bound up with the definition of sale. The learned Judges rejected the argument that the Act and the Rules must be read together to see whether the State has made a law imposing a tax in contravention of article 286, remarking that if the Act itself is bad,, the rules, made under it cannot have any greater efficacy.\nNor was the Government, which was authorised to make rules for carrying out the purpose of the Act, under an obligation to exclude the exempted sales. The rules, too, did not exclude all the three categories of exempted sales but only two of them, and even such exclusion was hedged 1077 In view of the importance of the issues involved, notice of the appeal was issued to the AdvocatesGeneral of States under Order XLI, Rule 1, and many of them intervened and appeared before us\nThe Advocate-General of Bombay, appearing on behalf of the appellants, took strong exception to the manner in which the learned Judges below disposed of the objection to the maintainability of the petition.\nHe complained that, having entertained the petition on the ground that infringement of fundamental rights was alleged, and that the remedy under article 226 was, therefore, appropriate, the learned Judges issued a writ without finding that any fundamental right had in fact been infringed. Learned counsel for the State of West Bengal also represented that parties in that State frequently got petitions under article 226 admitted by alleging violation of some fundamental right, and the court sometimes issued the writ asked for without insisting on the allegation being substantiated\nWe are of opinion that it is always desirable, when relief under article 226 is sought on allegations of infringement of fundamental rights, that the court should satisfy itself that such allegations are well founded before proceeding further with the matter. In the present case, however, the appellants can have no grievance, as the respondents allegation of infringement of their fundamental right under article 19 (1) (g) was based on their contention that the Act was ultra vires the State Legislature, and that contention having been accepted, by the Court below, there would clearly be an unauthorised restriction on the respondents right to carry on their trade, registration and licence being required only to facilitate collection of the tax imposed\nAs Mr. Seervai for the respondents rightly submitted, the fact that the Court below left the question undecided, though the point was concluded by the 1078 decision of this Court in Mohammad Yasin v. The Town Area Committee, Jalalbad (1), which was brought to the notice of the learned Judges, was not the fault of the respondents and gave no real cause for complaint.\nit is necessary to ascertain the scope of such power and the nature and extent of the restrictions placed upon it by article 286.\nThe power is conferred by article 246 (3) read with entry 54 of List 11 of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution. The Legislature of any State has, under these provisions, the exclusive power to make laws for such State or any part thereof with respect to taxes on the sale or purchase of goods other than newspapers. The expression for such State or any part thereof cannot, in our view, be taken to import into entry 54 the restriction that the sale or purchase referred to must take place within the territory of that State. All that it means is that the laws which a State is empowered to make must be for the purposes of that State\nAs pointed out by the Privy Council in the Wallace Brothers case (2) in dealing with the competency of the Indian Legislature to impose tax on the income arising abroad to a non-resident foreign company, the constitutional validity of the relevant statutory provisions did not turn on the possession by the legislature of extra-territorial powers but on the existence of a sufficient territorial connection between the taxing State and what it seeks to tax\nIn the case of sales-tax it is not necessary that the sale or purchase should take place within the territorial limits of the State in the sense that all the ingredients of a sale like the agreement to sell, the passing of title, delivery of the goods, etc., should have a territorial connection with the State. Broadly speaking, local activities of buying or selling carried on in the State in relation to local goods would be a sufficient basis to sustain the taxing power of the State, provided of course, such (1) 1952 S.C.R. 572. (2) 1948 S.C.R. I 1079 activities ultimately resulted in a concluded sale or purchase to be taxed. In exercise of the legislative power conferred upon them in substantially similar terms by the Government of India Act, 1935, the Provincial Legislatures enacted sales-tax laws for their respective Provinces, acting on the principle of territorial nexus referred to above that is to say, they picked out one or more of the ingredients constituting a sale and made them the basis of their sales-tax legislation.\nAssam and Bengal made among other things the actual existence of the goods in the Province at the time of the contract of sale the test of taxability. \n In Bihar the pro- duction or manufacture of the goods in the Province was made an additional ground. A net of the widest range perhaps was laid in Central Provinces and Bert where it was sufficient if the goods were actually found in the Province at any time after the contract of sale or purchase in respect thereof was made.\nWhether the territorial nexus put forward as the basis of the taxing power in each case would be sustained as sufficient was a matter of doubt not having been tested in a court of law. And such claims to taxing power led to multiple taxation of the same transaction by different Provinces and cumulation of the burden falling ultimately on the consuming public\nThis situation posed to the Constitution makers the problem of restricting the taxing power on sales or purchases involving inter-State elements, and alleviating the tax burden on the consumer. At the same time they were evidently anxious to maintain the State power of imposing non-discriminatory taxes on goods imported from other States, while upholding the economic unity of India by providing for the freedom of inter-State trade and commerce. In their attempt to harmonise and achieve these somewhat conflicting objectives they enacted articles 286, 301 an 304.\nThese articles read as follows 286. (1) No law of a State shall impose, or authorise the imposition of, a tax on the sale or purchase of goods where such sale or purchase takes place- 1080 (a) outside the State or (b) in the course of the import of the goods into, nor export of the goods out of, the territory of India. Explanation.-For the purposes of sub-clause (a), a sale or purchase shall be deemed to have taken place in the State in which the goods have actually been delivered as a direct result of such sale or purchase for the purpose of consumption in that State, notwithstanding the fact that under the general law relating to sale of goods the property in the goods has by reason of such sale or purchase passed in another State. Except in so far as Parliament may by law otherwise provide, no law of a State shall impose, or authorise the imposition of, a tax on the sale or purchase of any goods where such sale or purchase takes place in the course of inter-State trade or commerce Provided that the President may by order direct that any tax on the sale or purchase of goods which was being lawfully levied by the Government of any State immediately before the commencement of this Constitution shall, notwithstanding that the imposition of such tax is contrary to the provisions of this clause, continue to be levied until the thirty-first day of March, 1951. \n No law made by the Legislature of a State im- posing, or authorising the imposition of, a tax on the sale or purchase of any such goods as have been declared by Parliament by law to be essential for the life of the community shall have effect unless it has been reserved for the consideration of the President and has received his assent. 301, Subject to the other provisions of this Part, trade, commerce and intercourse throughout the territory of India shall be free. Notwithstanding anything in article 301 or article 303, the Legislature of a State may by law- (a) impose on goods imported from other States any tax to which similar goods manufactured or 1081 produced in that State are subject, so, however, as not to discriminate between goods so imported and goods,, so manufactured or produced and (b) impose such reasonable restrictions on the freedom of trade, commerce or intercourse with or within that State as may be required in the public interest Provided that no Bill or amendment for the purposes of clause (b) shall be introduced or moved in the Legislature of a State without the previous sanction of the President.\nIt will be seen that the principle of freedom of inter- State trade and commerce declared in article 301 is expressly subordinated to the State power of taxing goods imported from sister States, provided only no discrimination is made in favour of similar goods of local origin. Thus the States in India have full power of imposing what in American State legislation is -called the use tax, gross receipts tax, etc. not to speak of the familiar property tax, subject only to the condition that such tax is imposed on all goods of the same kind produced or manufactured in the taxing State, although such taxation is undoubtedly calculated to fetter inter-State trade and commerce. In other words, the commercial unity of India is made to give way before the State-power of imposing any non-dis- criminatory tax on goods imported from sister States. Having thus provided for the freedom of inter-State trade and commerce subject to the important qualification mentioned above, the authors of the Constitution had to devise a formula of restrictions to be imposed on the State- power of taxing sales or purchases involving inter-State elements which would avoid the doubts and difficulties arising out of the imposition of sales-tax on the same transaction by several Provincial Legislatures in the country before the commencement of the Constitution\nThis they did by enacting clause (1) (a) with the Explanation and clause (2) of article 286. Clause (1) (a) prohibits the taxation of all sales or purchases which take place outside the State, 1082 but a localised sale is a troublesome concept, for, a sale is a composite transaction involving as it does several elements such as agreement to sell, transfer of ownership, payment of the price, delivery of the goods and. so forth, which may take place at different places. How, then, is it to be determined whether a particular sale or purchase took place within or outside the State ? \n It is difficult to say that any one of the ingredients mentioned above is more essential to a sale or purchase than the others. To solve the difficulty an easily applicable test for determining what is an outside sale had to be formulated, and that is what, in our opinion, the Explanation was intended to do. It provides by means of a legal fiction that the State in which the goods sold or purchased are actually delivered for consumption therein is the State in which the sale or purchase is to be considered to have taken place, notwithstanding the property in such goods passed in another State.\nWhy an outside sale or purchase is explained by defining what is an inside sale, and why actual delivery and consumption in the State are made the determining factors in locating a sale or purchase will presently appear. The test of sufficient territorial nexus was thus replaced by a simpler and more easily workable test Are the goods actually delivered in the taxing State, as a direct result of a sale or purchase, for the purpose of consumption therein ? Then, such sale or purchase shall be deemed to have taken place in that State and outside all other States. The latter States are prohibited from taxing the sale or purchase the former alone is left free to do so.\nMultiple taxation of the same transaction by different States is also thus avoided. It is, however, argued on behalf of Bombay that the Explanation does not say that the State of delivery is the only State in which the sale or purchase shall be deemed to have taken place. \n If that was the intention, it would have been easy to say so. On the other hand, the non-obstante clause in the Explanation is said to indicate that, apart from cases covered by the legal fiction, the passing of property in the goods is to determine the place of sale. Thus, both the State of delivery 1083 and the State in which the property in the goods sold passes are, it is claimed, empowered to tax\nWe are unable to accept this view. It is really not necessary in the context to use the word only in the way suggested, for, when the Explanation says that a sale or purchase shall be deemed to have taken place in a particular State, it follows that it shall be deemed also to have taken place outside the other States. Nor can the non-obstante clause be understood as implying that, under the general law relating to the sale of goods, the passing of the property in the goods is the determining factor in locating a sale or purchase. Neither the Sale of Goods Act nor the common law relating to the sale of goods has anything to say as to what the situs of a sale is, though certain rules have been laid down for ascertaining the intention of the contracting parties as to when or under what conditions the property in the goods is to pass to the buyer\nThat question often raises ticklish problems for lawyers and courts, and to make the passing of title the determining factor in the location of a sale or purchase would be to replace old uncertainties and difficulties connected with the nexus basis with new ones. Nor would the hardship of multiple taxation be obviated if two States were still free to impose tax on the same tran- saction\nIn our opinion, the non-obstante clause was inserted in the Explanation simply with a view to make it clear beyond all possible doubt that it was immaterial where the property in the goods passed, as it might otherwise be regarded as indicative of the place of sale. It is also to be noted in this connection that, on the construction suggested by the Advocate-General of Bombay, namely, that the Explanation was not intended to deprive the State in which the property in the goods passed of its taxing power, but only to exclude the sales or purchases of the kind described in the Explanation from the operation of clause (1) (a) which prohibits taxation of outside sales or purchases, the Explanation would operate, not as an explanation, but as an exception or a proviso to that clause. It 1084 may be that the description of a provision cannot be decisive of its true meaning or interpretation which must depend on the words used therein, but, when two interpretations are sought to be put upon a provision, that which fits the description which the legislature has chosen to apply to it is, according to sound canons of construction, to be adopted provided, of course, it is consistent with the language employed, in preference to the one which attributes to the provision a different effect from what it should have according to its description by the legislature\nIt is to be noted that the Explanation does not say that the consumption should be by the purchaser himself. Nor do the words as a direct result have reference to consumption. They qualify actual delivery . \n The expression for the purpose of consumption in that State must, in our opinion, be understood as having reference not merely to the individual importer or purchaser but as contemplating distribution eventually to consumers in general within the State. Thus all buyers within the State of delivery from out-of-State sellers, except those buying for re-export out of the State, would be within the scope of-the Explanation and liable to be taxed by the State on their inter-State transactions.\nIt should be remembered here that the Explanation deals only with interState sales. or purchases and not with purely local or domestic transactions. That these are subject to the taxing power of the State has never been questioned. We are therefore of opinion that article 286 (1) (a) read with the Explanation prohibits taxation of sales 1085 or purchases involving inter-State elements by all States except the State in which the goods are delivered for the purpose of consumption therein in the wider sense explained above. The latter State is left free to tax such sales or purchases, which power it derives not by virtue of the Explanation but under article 246 (3) read with entry 54 of List II\nWe will now consider the effect of article 286(2) on the taxability of inter-State sales or purchases of the kind envisaged by the Explanation to clause (1) (a). As both the Explanation and clause (2) deal only with inter-State transactions, it may appear at first blush that whatever taxing power the Explanation may have reserved to the state of delivery is nullified by clause (2), at any rate until Parliament chooses to lift the ban under the power reserved to it by the opening words of clause (2). As one way of avoiding this result I it was suggested by the Advocate- Gneral of Bombay that the expression inter-State trade and commerce in clause (2) may be construed as meaning dealings between a trader in one State and a trader in another, so that the clause would be applicable only to sales or purchases in the course of dealings between such traders. The ban under clause (2) could not in that view, affect the taxability of a sale by a trader in one State to a consumer or user in another.\nWe cannot agree with this restrictive interpretation of the expression inter-State trade and commerce. The sale by a trader in one State to a user in another would be a sale in the course of inter-State trade according to the natural meaning of those words, and we can see no reason for importing the restriction that the transaction should be one between two traders only. \n This is, however, not to say that the ban under clause (2) extends to the taxing power which the delivery State is left free, under the Explanation, to exercise. We are of opinion that the operation of clause (2) stands excluded as a result of the legal fiction enacted in the explanation, and the State in which the goods are actually delivered for consumption can impose tax on inter-State sales or purchases\nThe effect of the 1086 Explanation in regard to inter-State dealings is, in our view, to invest what, in truth, is an inter-State transac- tion with an intrastate character in relation to the State of delivery, and clause (2) can, therefore, have no application. It is true that the legal fiction is to operate for the purposes of sub-clause (a) of clause (1), but that means merely that the Explanation is designed to explain the meaning of the expression outside the State in clause (1) (a). When once, however, it is determined with the aid of the fictional test that a particular sale or purchase has taken place within the taxing State, it follows, as a corollary, that the transaction loses its inter-State character and falls outside the purview of clause (2), not because the definition in the Explanation is used for the purpose of clause (2), but because such sale or purchase becomes in the eye of the law a purely local transaction\nthe Explanation envisages sales or purchases under which out-of-State goods are imported into the State. That is the essential element which makes such a transaction inter-State in character, and if it is turned into an intrastate transaction by the operation of the legal fiction which blots out from view the inter-State element , it is not logical to say that the transaction, though now become local and domestic in the eye of the law, still retains its inter-State character. The statutory fiction completely masks the inter-State character of the sale or purchase which, as a collateral result of such making, falls outside the scope of clause (2)\nthe Explanation does not cover cases of inter-State sales or purchases under which the goods are imported into the State for reexport to other States and possibly other categories of sales or purchases which do not satisfy all the requirements of the explanation.\nWhether such transactions are sufficiently numerous for the Constitution to take note of is a matter of opinion and it cannot have much bearing on the question of construction. \n On the other hand there are, in our judgment, cogent considerations which tend to support the view we have expressed above that clause (2) was not intended to affect the power of the delivery State to tax inter-State sales or purchases of the kind mentioned in the Explanation. As we have seen, in our Constitution the principle of freedom of inter-State trade and commerce is made to give way before the State-power of imposing non-discriminatory taxes on goods imported from other States. Now, article 286(2) is but one phase of the protection accorded to interState trade and commerce from the fettering power of State taxation.\nAs article 286 deals with restrictions on the power of the States to impose tax on the sale or purchase of goods, the Constitution makers evidently thought that it should contain also a specific provision safeguarding sales or purchases of an inter-State character against the taxing power of the States.\nIt is however, reasonable to suppose that this particular form of protection to inter-State trade and commerce provided in article 286(2) was not intended to have a wider operation than what is contemplated in Part XIII which declares the general principle of freedom of inter-State commerce and defines the measure of constitutional protection it should enjoy. If such protection is intended to give way before the State-power of taxing goods imported from sister States, subject only to the condition against discrimination, it is legitimate to suppose that the ban under article 286(2) should not operate so as to nullify that power. True, article 304 (a) deals with the restrictions as to imposition of tax on goods, while article 1088 deals with the restrictions as to imposition of tax on sales or purchases of goods.\nBut this distinc tion loses its practical importance in the case of sales-tax imposed by the delivery State under the conditions mentioned in the Explanation, for, if we look behind the labels at the substance of the matter, it becomes clear that a tax on sales or purchases imposed by the State in which the goods are delivered for consumption, in the sense already explained, is, in economic effect practically indistinguishable from a tax on the consumption or use of the goods. The words in which the goods have actually been delivered ensure that the goods have come into the State, and the expression for the purpose of consumption in the State shows that, though the tax is formally laid on sales, its incidence is aimed at the consumers in the State\nDiscussing the true nature of a duty of excise and a tax on the sale of goods, Gwyer C. J. observed in the Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax case (1) It is common ground that the Court is entitled to look at the real substance of the Act imposing it, at what it does and not merely at what it says, in order to ascertain the true nature of the tax. Since writers on political economy are agreed that taxes on the sale of commodities are simply taxes on the commodities themselves, it is possible to regard a tax on the retail sale of motor spirit -and lubricants as a tax on those commodities\nTherefore, sales-tax, the incidence of which is really directed against the consumer, is, in substance, a tax on the goods imposed, no doubt, on the occasion of the sale as a taxable event. \n It will now be seen why the Explanation insists on actual delivery of the goods in the State and their consumption in the State, and why an outside sale or purchase is explained by defining what is an inside sale.\nThe object clearly is to assimilate the conditions, under which the delivery State is left free to tax inter-State sales or purchases, to those under which a State is empowered to impose tax on goods imported into the State from other States under article 304 (a). If then, a non-discriminatory use or consumption tax imposed under (1) 1939 F.C.R. 18, 42. 1089 article 304 on goods imported from other States does not infringe the freedom of inter-State commerce declared by article 301, parity of reason and policy requires that a tax on sales or purchases imposed by the State in which the goods are actually delivered for consumption in the State should not be regarded as violative of the ban under article 286 (2), and that is what the statutory fiction enacted in the Explanation was, in our judgment, designed to achieve by divesting the sale or purchase of the kind referred. to in the Explanation of its inter-State character in relation to the State of delivery.\nIf both the exporting State and the delivery State were entitled, notwithstanding article 286(2), to tax the inter-State sale or purchase, as suggested by the Advocate-General of Bombay, it would mean that the transaction is subjected to double taxation as compared with a sale by a local dealer which pays only one tax. It is precisely this type of discriminatory burden which the principle of freedom of inter-State commerce seeks to avoid, for, it places inter-State trade at a disadvantage in competition with local trade\nOn the other hand, if neither State could tax such sale or purchase as is referred to in the explanation, until Parliament lifted the ban, as the Advocate-General of Madras was inclined to think, the result would be that consumers could get out-of-State goods more cheaply than local goods, and local dealers would suffer competitive disadvantage as compared with outside dealers. Does the principle of freedom of inter-State commerce require that a State should foster such commerce to the detriment of domestic trade ? It is one thing to avoid impeding inter-State commerce by imposing discriminatory burdens upon it which internal trade does not have to bear, but quite another to place local products and local business at a disadvantage in competition with outside goods and dealers.\nIt would be 1090 a curious perversion of the principle of freedom of inter-State commerce to drive local custom across the border to outside dealers, and that, in our opinion, could not have been contemplated\nThe view which we have expressed above avoids either anomaly and would place local trade and interstate trade on an equal footing. The delivery State would tax both local and out-of-State goods equally without discrimination against either and that, we think, is the only measure of protection which article 286 could reasonably be supposed to accord to interState sales or purchases, when it is construed in the light of articles 301 and 304\nThe question next arises as to whether the, Act contravenes all or any of the restrictions imposed by article 286.\nIt is the respondents case that the sales and purchases made by them in Bombay, in the course of their business, include all the three categories excluded from the scope of State- taxation by article 286, and the Act seeking to bring all of them within its scheme of taxation is bad. It is, therefore, necessary to make a brief survey of the main provisions of the Act and of the rules made thereunder, in order to see whether the respondents complaint is well- founded, and, if so, whether the whole or any part of the Act is to be declared unconstitutional and void.\nThe Act provides for levy of two kinds of taxes, called the general tax and the special tax, by the two charging sections 5 and 10 respectively. Dealer is defined in section 2 (7) as a person who carries on the business of selling goods in the State of Bombay whether for commission, remuneration or otherwise and includes a State Government which carries on such business and any society, club or association which sells goods to its members. The Expla- nation (2) to this definition provides that the manager or agent of a dealer who resides outside the State of Bombay and carries on the business of selling goods in the State of Bombay shall, in respect of such business, be deemed to be a dealer for the purpose of the Act\nSale is defined by section 2 (14) with all 1091 its grammatical variations and cognate expressions as meaning any transfer of property in goods for cash or deferred payment or other valuable consideration and includes any supply by a society, a club, or an association to its members on payment of price or of fees or subscriptions but does not include a mortgage, hypothecation, charge or pledge. The words buy and purchase are to be construed accordingly.\nThere are two Explanations attached to this definition of which the second, which is obviously based on the Explanation to clause (1) (a) of article, 286, provides that the sale of any goods which have actually been delivered in the State of Bombay as a direct result of such sale for the purpose of consumption in the said State, shall be deemed, for the purposes of this Act, to have taken place in the said State, irrespective of the fact that the property in the goods has, by reason of such sale, passed in another State. Turnover is defined by section 2(21) as the aggregate of the amounts of sale price received and receivable by a dealer in respect of any sale of goods made during a given period after deducting the amount, if any, refunded by the dealer to a purchaser in respect of any goods purchased and returned by the purchaser within the prescribed period. Section 5 imposes the general tax on every dealer whose turnover in respect of sales within the State of Bombay during any of the three consecutive years immediately preceding the first day of April, 1952, has exceeded Rs. 30,000 or whose turnover in respect of such sales exceeds the said limit during the year commencing on the first day of April, 1952\nThe tax is to be levied on his taxable turnover in respect of sales of goods made on or after the appointed day, i.e., 1st November, 1952, at the rate of 3 pies in the rupee (section 6). By section 7 the taxable turnover is to be determined by first deducting from the turnover of the dealer in respect of all his sales of goods during any period of his liability to pay the general tax, his turnover during that period, in respect of (a) sales of any goods declared from time to time as tax-free under section 8 and(b) ,,such other sales as may be prescribed, No dealer 1092 liable to pay the general tax shall carry on business as a dealer unless he has applied for registration (section 9). \n A more or less similar scheme is provided for the levy of a special tax on the sale of certain special goods specified in Schedule II. By section 10 every dealer whose turnover in respect of sales of special goods made within the State of Bombay has exceeded Rs. 5,000 during the year ended 31st March, 1952, or exceeds the said limit during the year commencing from 1st April, 1952, is charged with a special tax at the rate specified in Schedule 11 on his taxable turnover in respect of the sales of special goods made on or after the appointed day, i.e., 1st November, 1952.\nBy section II the taxable turnover is to be determined by first deducting, from the turnover of the dealer in respect of his sales of special goods during any period of his liability, his turnover in respect of (a) sales of special goods purchased by him, on or after the appointed day at a place in the State of Bombay from a dealer holding a licence under section 12 and (b) such other sales as may be prescribed. Every dealer liable to pay the special tax is required to obtain a licence as a condition of his carrying on his business (section 12).\n Then follow certain pro- visions for returns, assessment, payment and recovery of tax. Section 18 imposes a purchase tax at the rate of 3 pies in the rupee on the purchases of such goods as may be notified by the State Government from time to time which have been despatched or brought from any -place in India outside the State of Bombay or are delivered as a direct result of a sale to a buyer in, the State of Bombay for consumption therein, and also an additional tax if the goods are special goods. Section 21 (2) prohibits any person selling goods from collecting from the purchaser any amount by way of tax unless he is a registered dealer or a licensed dealer and is liable to pay the tax under this Act in respect of such sale.\nSection 45 empowers the State Government to make rules for carrying out the purposes of this Act. In particular, such rules may prescribe, among other things, the other sales, turnover in respect of which may be deducted from a dealers turnover in computing his taxable turnover as defined in section 7 and in section 11 sub-section (2) (e). In exercise of the powers conferred by this section, the State Government made and published rules called the Bombay Sales Tax Rules, 1952, which were brought into force on the same day on which the charging sections 5 and 10 of the Act were also brought into force, namely, November 1, 1952\nOf these, Rules 5(1) and 6(1) are important, and they provide for the deduction of the following sales in calculating taxable turnover under section 7 (general tax) and section 11 (special tax) (1) sales which take place (a) in the course of the import of the goods into or export of the goods out of the territory of India or (b) in the course of inter-State trade or commerce. It is to be noted that these are the excluded categories of sales or purchases under article 286 (1) (b) and (2) respectively. \n Rule 5(2) (1) requires, as a condition of the aforesaid deductions, that the goods should be consigned by certain specified modes of transport. Clause (v) lays down a rule of presumption to be acted upon in the absence of evidence of actual consignment of the goods within three months of the sale, that the sale has not taken place in the course of export or of inter- State trade as the case may be.\nit will be seen from the provisions summarised above that the Act does not in terms exclude from its purview the sales or purchases taking place outside the State of Bombay while it does include, by Explanation (2) to the definition of sale, the sales or purchases under which the delivery and consumption take place in Bombay which, by virtue of the Explanation to article 286(1)(a), are to be regarded as local 1094 sales or purchases. On the construction we have placed upon that Explanation, sales or purchases effected in Bombay in respect of goods in Bombay but delivered for consumption outside Bombay are not taxable in Bombay. \n Now, the respondents complain that the latter category of sales or purchases thus held not to be taxable are not expressly excluded by the Act which, therefore, contravenes article 286 (1)(a). No doubt, there is no provision in the Act excluding in express terms sales of the kind referred to above, but neither is there any provision purporting to impose tax on such sales or purchases. On the other hand, the two charging sections of the Act, section 5 and section 10, purport, in express terms, to impose the tax on all sales made within the State of Bombay, and section 18, which lays the tax on purchases, is limited in its operation to purchases of goods delivered to a buyer in the State of Bombay for consumption therein, that is to say, to purchases which unquestionably are taxable by Bombay according to both parties\nThe charging sections cannot, therefore, be taken to cover the class of sales or purchases which, on our construction of the Explanation, are to be regarded as taking place outside the State of Bombay. \n We see no force, therefore, in the argument that the Act contravenes the provisions of article 286(1)(a) by purporting to charge sales or purchases excluded by that article from State- taxation\nAs regards the other two categories of sales or purchases excluded by article 286(1)(b) and (2), it is true that the Act taken by itself does not provide for their exclusion. But, as pointed out already, rules 5 and 6, which deal respectively with deduction of certain sales in calculating the taxable turnover under sections 7 and 11 exclude these two categories in express terms, and these rules were brought into force simultaneously with the charging sections 5 and 10 on November 1, 1952. \n The position, therefore, was that, on the date -when the general tax and the special tax became leviable under the Act, sales or purchases of the kind described under article 286(1) (b) and (2) stood in fact excluded from taxation, and the State of 1095 Bombay cannot be considered to have made a law imposing or authorising the imposition of a tax on sales or purchases excluded under the aforesaid clauses of article 286\nThe Act and the rules having been brought into operation simultaneously, there is no obvious reason why the rules framed in exercise of the power delegated by the Legislature should not be regarded as part of the law made by the State\nThe position might be different if the rules had come into operation sometime later than the charging sections of the Act, for, in that case, it is arguable that if the legislation, without excluding the two classes of sales or purchases, was beyond the competence of the Legislature at the date when it was passed, the exclusion subsequently effected by the rules cannot validate such legislation. But, as already stated, that is not the position here, and the learned Judges below fell into an error by overlooking this crucial fact when they say If the Legislature had no competence on the date the law was passed, the rules subsequently framed cannot confer competence on the Legislature.\nThe conditions and qualifications complained of are mostly found to relate to mere matters of proof, e.g., rule 5(2), Explanation (2), which insists on the production of a certificate from an appropriate authority, before a motor vehicle, despatched to a place outside the State of Bombay by road and driven by its own power, could be exempted as an article sold in the course of interState trade. No objection can reasonably be raised if the taxing authority insists on certain modes of proof being adduced before a claim to exclusion can be allowed.\nThe argument is not without force, and it must be held that rule 5(2)(1) is ultra vires the rule-making authority and therefore void. But it is clearly severable from rule 5(1)(1). The restriction regarding the mode of transport of the goods sold or purchased in the course of inter-State trade, to which alone sub-rule (2)(1) relates, can be ignored and the exemption under rule 5(1)(1) may well be allowed to stand\nit must be conceded that the general effect of fixing these minimum limits must necessarily be to enable traders whose taxable turnover is below those limits to sell their goods at lower prices to their customers than dealers whose turnover exceeded 1097 those limits, for the latter have to add the sales-tax to the prices of their goods. But no discrimination is involved in this classification which is perfectly reason-, able when it is borne in mind that the State may not consider it administratively worthwhile to tax sales by small traders who have no organisational facilities for collecting the tax from their buyers and turn it over to the Government. Each State must, in imposing a tax of this nature, fix its own limits below which it does not consider it administratively feasible or worthwhile to impose the tax. It is idle to suggest that any discrimination is involved in such classification\nIn the present case the tax is imposed, in ultimate analysis, on receipts from individual sales or purchases of goods effected during the accounting period, and it is therefore possible to separate at the assessment the receipts derived from exempted sales or purchases and allow the State to enforce the statute with respect to the constitutionally taxable subjects, it being assumed that the State intends naturally to keep what it could lawfully tax, even where it purports to authorize the taxation of what is constitutionally exempt.\nThe principle, as it (1) 256 U.S. 642 65 L. Ed. 1098 is tersely put in the American case, is that severability in such cases includes separability in enforcement. \n Our attention was drawn to the decision of the Privy Council in Punjab Province v. Daulat Singh and Others(1) as condemnatory of this principle.\nThe case is however, clearly distinguishable. Their Lordships were dealing with a Provincial enactment providing for the avoidance of benami transactions as therein specified and the question was whether it was ultra vires the Legislature as contravening section 298(1) of the Government of India Act, 1935, which forbade the prohibition, inter alia, of disposition of property by an Indian subject on certain grounds which included descent. It was found that in some cases the impugned enactment would operate as a prohibition on the ground of descent alone. The Federal Court(1) by majority expressed the view that the Act could not, for that reason, be invalidated as a whole but that the circumstances in which its provisions would be inoperative must be limited to cases where the statute actually operated in contravention of the constitutional inhibition. \n Disagreeing with this view their Lordships made the following observations which were strongly relied on before us The majority of the Federal Court appear to have contemplated another form of severability, namely, by a classification of the particular cases on which the impugned Act may happen to operate, involving an inquiry into the circumstances of each individual case. \n There are no words in the Act capable of being so construed, and such a course would in effect involve an amendment of the Act by the court, a course which is beyond the competency of the court, as has long been well established.\nThe subject of the constitutional prohibition was single and indivisible, namely, disposition of property on grounds only of (among other things) descent and if, in its actual operation, the impugned statute was found to transgress the constitutional mandate, the whole Act had to be held void as the words used (1) 1946 F.C.R. 1. (2) 1942 F.C.R. 67. 1099 covered both what was constitutionally permissible and what was not.\nIt was, indeed, applied also in Bowmans case(1) with respect to the licence tax imposed generally on the entire business conducted including inter- State commerce as well as domestic business, but was not applied, as stated above, with respect to excise tax which was laid on every gallon of gasolene sold and was thus divisible in its nature. It is a sound rule to extend severability to include separability in enforcement in such cases, and we are of opinion that the principle should be applied in dealing with taxing statutes in this country, We accordingly set aside the declaration made by the court below and quash the writ issued by it except in regard to rule 5 (2) (1). An injunction shall, however, issue restraining the appellants from imposing or authorising the imposition of a tax on sales and purchases which are exempted from taxation by article 286 as interpreted above", + "expert_4": "This is an appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay declaring the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1952, (Act XXIV of 1952), ultra vires the State Legislature and issuing a writ in the nature of mandamus against the State of Bombay and the Collector of Sales Tax, Bombay, appellants herein, directing them to forbear and desist from enforcing the provisions of the said Act against the respondents who are dealers in motor cars in Bombay.\nThe Legislature of the State of Bombay enacted the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1952, (hereinafter referred to as ,the Act) and it was brought into force on October 9, 1952, by notification issued under section 1 (3) of the Act, except sections 5, 9, 10 and 47 which came into operation on November 1, 1952, as notified under section 2 (3).\nOn, the same day the rules made by the State Government in exercise of the power conferred by section 45 of the Act also came into force.\na petition to the High Court under article 226 of the Constitution challenging the validity of the Act on the ground that it is ultra vires the State Legislature, inasmuch as it purported to tax sales arid purchases of goods regardless of the restrictions imposed on State legislative power by article 286 of the Constitution.\nIt was also alleged that the provisions of the Act were discriminatory in their effect and, therefore, void under article 14 read with article 13 of the Constitution.\nThe respondents accordingly prayed for the issue of a writ in the nature of mandamus against the appellants preventing them from enforcing the provisions of the Act against the respondents.\nA further ground of attack was added by amendment of the petition to the effect that the Act being wholly ultra vires and void, the provisions requiring dealers to apply for registration in some cases and to obtain a licence in some others as a condition of carrying on their business, infringed the fundamental rights of the respondents under article 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution.\nIn the affidavit filed in answer the appellants traversed the allegations in the petition and contended, inter alia, that the Act was a complete code and provided for special machinery for dealing with all questions arising under it, including questions of constitutionality, and, therefore, the petition was not maintainable, that the present ease was not an appropriate one for the issue of a writ under article 226 as the validity of the imposition of a tax was questioned, that no assessment proceedings having been initiated against the respondents and no demand notice having been issued, the respondents had no cause of action, and that, properly construed, the Act and the Rules did not contravene article 286 or any other provisions of the Constitution and did not infringe any fundamental right of the respondents\nDivision Bench of the High Court consisting of Chagla C. J. and Dixit J. Chagla C. J., who delivered the judgment, Dixit J. concurring, overruled the preliminary objection disdistinguishing the decisions cited in support thereof by pointing out that the principle that a court would not issue a prerogative writ when an adequate alternative remedy was available could not apply where, as here, a party came to the court with an allegation that his fundamental rights had been infringed and sought relief under article 226.\nThe learned Judges however thought, in view of the conclusion they had come to on the question of competency of the State Legislature to pass the Act, it was not necessary to consider the challenge that has been made to the Act under articles 14 and 19 and expressed no opinion on the alleged infringement of the respondents fundamental rights.\nOn the merits, the learned Judges held that the definition of sale in the Act was so wide as to include the three categories of sale exempted by article 286 from the imposition of sales tax by the States, and, as the definition governed the charging sections 5 and 10, the Act must be taken to impose the tax on such sales also in contravention of article 286.\nThe Act must, therefore, be declared wholly void, it being impossible to sever any specific offending provision so as to save the rest of the Act, as the definition pervades the whole Act and the whole scheme of the Act is bound up with the definition of sale.\nThe learned Judges rejected the argument that the Act and the Rules must be read together to see whether the State has made a law imposing a tax in contravention of article 286, remarking that if the Act itself is bad,, the rules, made under it cannot have any greater efficacy.\nNor was the Government, which was authorised to make rules for carrying out the purpose of the Act, under an obligation to exclude the exempted sales.\nThe rules, too, did not exclude all the three categories of exempted sales but only two of them, and even such exclusion was hedged\nIn view of the importance of the issues involved, notice of the appeal was issued to the AdvocatesGeneral of States under Order XLI, Rule 1, and many of them intervened and appeared before us.\nThe Advocate-General of Bombay, appearing on behalf of the appellants, took strong exception to the manner in which the learned Judges below disposed of the objection to the maintainability of the petition.\nHe complained that, having entertained the petition on the ground that infringement of fundamental rights was alleged, and that the remedy under article 226 was, therefore, appropriate, the learned Judges issued a writ without finding that any fundamental right had in fact been infringed.\nLearned counsel for the State of West Bengal also represented that parties in that State frequently got petitions under article 226 admitted by alleging violation of some fundamental right, and the court sometimes issued the writ asked for without insisting on the allegation being substantiated.\nWe are of opinion that it is always desirable, when relief under article 226 is sought on allegations of infringement of fundamental rights, that the court should satisfy itself that such allegations are well founded before proceeding further with the matter.\nIn the present case, however, the appellants can have no grievance, as the respondents allegation of infringement of their fundamental right under article 19 (1) (g) was based on their contention that the Act was ultra vires the State Legislature, and that contention having been accepted, by the Court below, there would clearly be an unauthorised restriction on the respondents right to carry on their trade, registration and licence being required only to facilitate collection of the tax imposed.\nAs Mr. Seervai for the respondents rightly submitted, the fact that the Court below left the question undecided, though the point was concluded by the 1078 decision of this Court in Mohammad Yasin v. The Town Area Committee, Jalalbad (1), which was brought to the notice of the learned Judges, was not the fault of the respondents and gave no real cause for complaint.\nBefore considering whether the appellant State has made a law imposing, or authorising the imposition of, a tax on sales or purchases of goods in disregard of constitutional restrictions on its legislative power in that behalf, it is necessary to ascertain the scope of such power and the nature and extent of the restrictions placed upon it by article 286.\nThe power is conferred by article 246 (3) read with entry 54 of List 11 of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution.\nThe Legislature of any State has, under these provisions, the exclusive power to make laws for such State or any part thereof with respect to taxes on the sale or purchase of goods other than newspapers.\nThe expression for such State or any part thereof cannot, in our view, be taken to import into entry 54 the restriction that the sale or purchase referred to must take place within the territory of that State.\nAll that it means is that the laws which a State is empowered to make must be for the purposes of that State.\nAs pointed out by the Privy Council in the Wallace Brothers case (2) in dealing with the competency of the Indian Legislature to impose tax on the income arising abroad to a non-resident foreign company, the constitutional validity of the relevant statutory provisions did not turn on the possession by the legislature of extra-territorial powers but on the existence of a sufficient territorial connection between the taxing State and what it seeks to tax.\nIn the case of sales-tax it is not necessary that the sale or purchase should take place within the territorial limits of the State in the sense that all the ingredients of a sale like the agreement to sell, the passing of title, delivery of the goods, etc., should have a territorial connection with the State.\nBroadly speaking, local activities of buying or selling carried on in the State in relation to local goods would be a sufficient basis to sustain the taxing power of the State, provided of course, such (1) 1952 S.C.R. 572. (2) 1948 S.C.R. I 1079 activities ultimately resulted in a concluded sale or purchase to be taxed.\nIn exercise of the legislative power conferred upon them in substantially similar terms by the Government of India Act, 1935, the Provincial Legislatures enacted sales-tax laws for their respective Provinces, acting on the principle of territorial nexus referred to above that is to say, they picked out one or more of the ingredients constituting a sale and made them the basis of their sales-tax legislation.\nAssam and Bengal made among other things the actual existence of the goods in the Province at the time of the contract of sale the test of taxability.\nIn Bihar the pro- duction or manufacture of the goods in the Province was made an additional ground.\nWhether the territorial nexus put forward as the basis of the taxing power in each case would be sustained as sufficient was a matter of doubt not having been tested in a court of law.\nAnd such claims to taxing power led to multiple taxation of the same transaction by different Provinces and cumulation of the burden falling ultimately on the consuming public.\nThis situation posed to the Constitution makers the problem of restricting the taxing power on sales or purchases involving inter-State elements, and alleviating the tax burden on the consumer.\nAt the same time they were evidently anxious to maintain the State power of imposing non-discriminatory taxes on goods imported from other States, while upholding the economic unity of India by providing for the freedom of inter-State trade and commerce.\nIn their attempt to harmonise and achieve these somewhat conflicting objectives they enacted articles 286, 301 an 304.\nThese articles read as follows 286. (1) No law of a State shall impose, or authorise the imposition of, a tax on the sale or purchase of goods where such sale or purchase takes place- 1080 (a) outside the State or (b) in the course of the import of the goods into, nor export of the goods out of, the territory of India.\nExplanation.-For the purposes of sub-clause (a), a sale or purchase shall be deemed to have taken place in the State in which the goods have actually been delivered as a direct result of such sale or purchase for the purpose of consumption in that State, notwithstanding the fact that under the general law relating to sale of goods the property in the goods has by reason of such sale or purchase passed in another State.\nExcept in so far as Parliament may by law otherwise provide, no law of a State shall impose, or authorise the imposition of, a tax on the sale or purchase of any goods where such sale or purchase takes place in the course of inter-State trade or commerce Provided that the President may by order direct that any tax on the sale or purchase of goods which was being lawfully levied by the Government of any State immediately before the commencement of this Constitution shall, notwithstanding that the imposition of such tax is contrary to the provisions of this clause, continue to be levied until the thirty-first day of March, 1951.\nNo law made by the Legislature of a State im- posing, or authorising the imposition of, a tax on the sale or purchase of any such goods as have been declared by Parliament by law to be essential for the life of the community shall have effect unless it has been reserved for the consideration of the President and has received his assent. 301, Subject to the other provisions of this Part, trade, commerce and intercourse throughout the territory of India shall be free.\nNotwithstanding anything in article 301 or article 303, the Legislature of a State may by law- (a) impose on goods imported from other States any tax to which similar goods manufactured or 1081 produced in that State are subject, so, however, as not to discriminate between goods so imported and goods,, so manufactured or produced and (b) impose such reasonable restrictions on the freedom of trade, commerce or intercourse with or within that State as may be required in the public interest Provided that no Bill or amendment for the purposes of clause (b) shall be introduced or moved in the Legislature of a State without the previous sanction of the President.\nIt will be seen that the principle of freedom of inter- State trade and commerce declared in article 301 is expressly subordinated to the State power of taxing goods imported from sister States, provided only no discrimination is made in favour of similar goods of local origin.\nThus the States in India have full power of imposing what in American State legislation is -called the use tax, gross receipts tax, etc. not to speak of the familiar property tax, subject only to the condition that such tax is imposed on all goods of the same kind produced or manufactured in the taxing State, although such taxation is undoubtedly calculated to fetter inter-State trade and commerce.\nIn other words, the commercial unity of India is made to give way before the State-power of imposing any non-dis- criminatory tax on goods imported from sister States.\nHaving thus provided for the freedom of inter-State trade and commerce subject to the important qualification mentioned above, the authors of the Constitution had to devise a formula of restrictions to be imposed on the State- power of taxing sales or purchases involving inter-State elements which would avoid the doubts and difficulties arising out of the imposition of sales-tax on the same transaction by several Provincial Legislatures in the country before the commencement of the Constitution.\nThis they did by enacting clause (1) (a) with the Explanation and clause (2) of article 286.\nClause (1) (a) prohibits the taxation of all sales or purchases which take place outside the State, 1082 but a localised sale is a troublesome concept, for, a sale is a composite transaction involving as it does several elements such as agreement to sell, transfer of ownership, payment of the price, delivery of the goods and. so forth, which may take place at different places.\nHow, then, is it to be determined whether a particular sale or purchase took place within or outside the State ?\nIt is difficult to say that any one of the ingredients mentioned above is more essential to a sale or purchase than the others.\nTo solve the difficulty an easily applicable test for determining what is an outside sale had to be formulated, and that is what, in our opinion, the Explanation was intended to do.\nIt provides by means of a legal fiction that the State in which the goods sold or purchased are actually delivered for consumption therein is the State in which the sale or purchase is to be considered to have taken place, notwithstanding the property in such goods passed in another State.\nThe test of sufficient territorial nexus was thus replaced by a simpler and more easily workable test Are the goods actually delivered in the taxing State, as a direct result of a sale or purchase, for the purpose of consumption therein ?\nThen, such sale or purchase shall be deemed to have taken place in that State and outside all other States.\nThe latter States are prohibited from taxing the sale or purchase the former alone is left free to do so. Multiple taxation of the same transaction by different States is also thus avoided. It is, however, argued on behalf of Bombay that the Explanation does not say that the State of delivery is the only State in which the sale or purchase shall be deemed to have taken place. \n If that was the intention, it would have been easy to say so. On the other hand, the non-obstante clause in the Explanation is said to indicate that, apart from cases covered by the legal fiction, the passing of property in the goods is to determine the place of sale.\nThus, both the State of delivery 1083 and the State in which the property in the goods sold passes are, it is claimed, empowered to tax.\nIt is really not necessary in the context to use the word only in the way suggested, for, when the Explanation says that a sale or purchase shall be deemed to have taken place in a particular State, it follows that it shall be deemed also to have taken place outside the other States.\nNor can the non-obstante clause be understood as implying that, under the general law relating to the sale of goods, the passing of the property in the goods is the determining factor in locating a sale or purchase.\nNeither the Sale of Goods Act nor the common law relating to the sale of goods has anything to say as to what the situs of a sale is, though certain rules have been laid down for ascertaining the intention of the contracting parties as to when or under what conditions the property in the goods is to pass to the buyer.\nThat question often raises ticklish problems for lawyers and courts, and to make the passing of title the determining factor in the location of a sale or purchase would be to replace old uncertainties and difficulties connected with the nexus basis with new ones.\nNor would the hardship of multiple taxation be obviated if two States were still free to impose tax on the same tran- saction.\nIn our opinion, the non-obstante clause was inserted in the Explanation simply with a view to make it clear beyond all possible doubt that it was immaterial where the property in the goods passed, as it might otherwise be regarded as indicative of the place of sale.\nIt is also to be noted in this connection that, on the construction suggested by the Advocate-General of Bombay, namely, that the Explanation was not intended to deprive the State in which the property in the goods passed of its taxing power, but only to exclude the sales or purchases of the kind described in the Explanation from the operation of clause (1) (a) which prohibits taxation of outside sales or purchases, the Explanation would operate, not as an explanation, but as an exception or a proviso to that clause.\nIt 1084 may be that the description of a provision cannot be decisive of its true meaning or interpretation which must depend on the words used therein, but, when two interpretations are sought to be put upon a provision, that which fits the description which the legislature has chosen to apply to it is, according to sound canons of construction, to be adopted provided, of course, it is consistent with the language employed, in preference to the one which attributes to the provision a different effect from what it should have according to its description by the legislature.\nIt was then said that the formula of delivery for consumption within a State could only cover the com- paratively few cases of sales or purchases taking place directly between the consumers in the delivery State and dealers in other States, and inter-State sales or purchases between dealers in either State, which must be larger in number and volume, would still be outside the scope of the Explanation, which could not, therefore, have been intended to empower only one State, namely, the delivery State, to tax all inter-State sales or purchases.\nIt is to be noted that the Explanation does not say that the consumption should be by the purchaser himself.\nNor do the words as a direct result have reference to consumption. They qualify actual delivery . \n The expression for the purpose of consumption in that State must, in our opinion, be understood as having reference not merely to the individual importer or purchaser but as contemplating distribution eventually to consumers in general within the State.\nThus all buyers within the State of delivery from out-of-State sellers, except those buying for re-export out of the State, would be within the scope of-the Explanation and liable to be taxed by the State on their inter-State transactions.\nIt should be remembered here that the Explanation deals only with interState sales. or purchases and not with purely local or domestic transactions.\nThat these are subject to the taxing power of the State has never been questioned.\nWe are therefore of opinion that article 286 (1) (a) read with the Explanation prohibits taxation of sales 1085 or purchases involving inter-State elements by all States except the State in which the goods are delivered for the purpose of consumption therein in the wider sense explained above.\nThe latter State is left free to tax such sales or purchases, which power it derives not by virtue of the Explanation but under article 246 (3) read with entry 54 of List II.\nWe will now consider the effect of article 286(2) on the taxability of inter-State sales or purchases of the kind envisaged by the Explanation to clause (1) (a).\nAs both the Explanation and clause (2) deal only with inter-State transactions, it may appear at first blush that whatever taxing power the Explanation may have reserved to the state of delivery is nullified by clause (2), at any rate until Parliament chooses to lift the ban under the power reserved to it by the opening words of clause (2).\nAs one way of avoiding this result I it was suggested by the Advocate- Gneral of Bombay that the expression inter-State trade and commerce in clause (2) may be construed as meaning dealings between a trader in one State and a trader in another, so that the clause would be applicable only to sales or purchases in the course of dealings between such traders.\nThe ban under clause (2) could not in that view, affect the taxability of a sale by a trader in one State to a consumer or user in another.\nWe cannot agree with this restrictive interpretation of the expression inter-State trade and commerce.\nThe sale by a trader in one State to a user in another would be a sale in the course of inter-State trade according to the natural meaning of those words, and we can see no reason for importing the restriction that the transaction should be one between two traders only.\nThis is, however, not to say that the ban under clause (2) extends to the taxing power which the delivery State is left free, under the Explanation, to exercise.\nWe are of opinion that the operation of clause (2) stands excluded as a result of the legal fiction enacted in the explanation, and the State in which the goods are actually delivered for consumption can impose tax on inter-State sales or purchases.\nThe effect of the 1086 Explanation in regard to inter-State dealings is, in our view, to invest what, in truth, is an inter-State transac- tion with an intrastate character in relation to the State of delivery, and clause (2) can, therefore, have no application.\nIt is true that the legal fiction is to operate for the purposes of sub-clause (a) of clause (1), but that means merely that the Explanation is designed to explain the meaning of the expression outside the State in clause (1) (a).\nWhen once, however, it is determined with the aid of the fictional test that a particular sale or purchase has taken place within the taxing State, it follows, as a corollary, that the transaction loses its inter-State character and falls outside the purview of clause (2), not because the definition in the Explanation is used for the purpose of clause (2), but because such sale or purchase becomes in the eye of the law a purely local transaction.\nIt is said that even though all the essential ingredients of a sale took place within one State and the sale was, in that sense, a purely intrastate transaction, it might involve transport of the goods across the State- boundary, and that would be sufficient to bring it within the scope of clause (2).\nAs already stated, the Explanation envisages sales or purchases under which out-of-State goods are imported into the State.\nThat is the essential element which makes such a transaction inter-State in character, and if it is turned into an intrastate transaction by the operation of the legal fiction which blots out from view the inter-State element , it is not logical to say that the transaction, though now become local and domestic in the eye of the law, still retains its inter-State character.\nThe statutory fiction completely masks the inter-State character of the sale or purchase which, as a collateral result of such making, falls outside the scope of clause (2).\nIt is said that, on this view, clause (2) would become practically redundant, as clause (1) (a) read with the explanation as construed by us would itself preclude taxation by other States of inter-State sales or purchases of the kind referred to in the explanation\nAs 1087 We have already pointed out, the Explanation does not cover cases of inter-State sales or purchases under which the goods are imported into the State for reexport to other States and possibly other categories of sales or purchases which do not satisfy all the requirements of the explanation.\nOn the other hand there are, in our judgment, cogent considerations which tend to support the view we have expressed above that clause (2) was not intended to affect the power of the delivery State to tax inter-State sales or purchases of the kind mentioned in the Explanation.\nAs we have seen, in our Constitution the principle of freedom of inter-State trade and commerce is made to give way before the State-power of imposing non-discriminatory taxes on goods imported from other States.\nNow, article 286(2) is but one phase of the protection accorded to interState trade and commerce from the fettering power of State taxation.\nAs article 286 deals with restrictions on the power of the States to impose tax on the sale or purchase of goods, the Constitution makers evidently thought that it should contain also a specific provision safeguarding sales or purchases of an inter-State character against the taxing power of the States.\nIt is however, reasonable to suppose that this particular form of protection to inter-State trade and commerce provided in article 286(2) was not intended to have a wider operation than what is contemplated in Part XIII which declares the general principle of freedom of inter-State commerce and defines the measure of constitutional protection it should enjoy.\nIf such protection is intended to give way before the State-power of taxing goods imported from sister States, subject only to the condition against discrimination, it is legitimate to suppose that the ban under article 286(2) should not operate so as to nullify that power.\nTrue, article 304 (a) deals with the restrictions as to imposition of tax on goods, while article 1088 deals with the restrictions as to imposition of tax on sales or purchases of goods.\nBut this distinc tion loses its practical importance in the case of sales-tax imposed by the delivery State under the conditions mentioned in the Explanation, for, if we look behind the labels at the substance of the matter, it becomes clear that a tax on sales or purchases imposed by the State in which the goods are delivered for consumption, in the sense already explained, is, in economic effect practically indistinguishable from a tax on the consumption or use of the goods.\nThe words in which the goods have actually been delivered ensure that the goods have come into the State, and the expression for the purpose of consumption in the State shows that, though the tax is formally laid on sales, its incidence is aimed at the consumers in the State.\nDiscussing the true nature of a duty of excise and a tax on the sale of goods, Gwyer C. J. observed in the Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax case (1) It is common ground that the Court is entitled to look at the real substance of the Act imposing it, at what it does and not merely at what it says, in order to ascertain the true nature of the tax. Since writers on political economy are agreed that taxes on the sale of commodities are simply taxes on the commodities themselves, it is possible to regard a tax on the retail sale of motor spirit -and lubricants as a tax on those commodities.\nTherefore, sales-tax, the incidence of which is really directed against the consumer, is, in substance, a tax on the goods imposed, no doubt, on the occasion of the sale as a taxable event.\nIt will now be seen why the Explanation insists on actual delivery of the goods in the State and their consumption in the State, and why an outside sale or purchase is explained by defining what is an inside sale. The object clearly is to assimilate the conditions, under which the delivery State is left free to tax inter-State sales or purchases, to those under which a State is empowered to impose tax on goods imported into the State from other States under article 304 (a).\nIf then, a non-discriminatory use or consumption tax imposed under (1) 1939 F.C.R. 18, 42. 1089 article 304 on goods imported from other States does not infringe the freedom of inter-State commerce declared by article 301, parity of reason and policy requires that a tax on sales or purchases imposed by the State in which the goods are actually delivered for consumption in the State should not be regarded as violative of the ban under article 286 (2), and that is what the statutory fiction enacted in the Explanation was, in our judgment, designed to achieve by divesting the sale or purchase of the kind referred. to in the Explanation of its inter-State character in relation to the State of delivery.\nThere is another important consideration which strongly supports the view we have indicated above, namely article 286 (2) does not affect the taxation of such sale or purchase by the State of delivery.\nIf both the exporting State and the delivery State were entitled, notwithstanding article 286(2), to tax the inter-State sale or purchase, as suggested by the Advocate-General of Bombay, it would mean that the transaction is subjected to double taxation as compared with a sale by a local dealer which pays only one tax.\nIt is precisely this type of discriminatory burden which the principle of freedom of inter-State commerce seeks to avoid, for, it places inter-State trade at a disadvantage in competition with local trade.\nOn the other hand, if neither State could tax such sale or purchase as is referred to in the explanation, until Parliament lifted the ban, as the Advocate-General of Madras was inclined to think, the result would be that consumers could get out-of-State goods more cheaply than local goods, and local dealers would suffer competitive disadvantage as compared with outside dealers.\nDoes the principle of freedom of inter-State commerce require that a State should foster such commerce to the detriment of domestic trade ?\nIt is one thing to avoid impeding inter-State commerce by imposing discriminatory burdens upon it which internal trade does not have to bear, but quite another to place local products and local business at a disadvantage in competition with outside goods and dealers. It would be 1090 a curious perversion of the principle of freedom of inter-State commerce to drive local custom across the border to outside dealers, and that, in our opinion, could not have been contemplated.\nThe view which we have expressed above avoids either anomaly and would place local trade and interstate trade on an equal footing.\nThe delivery State would tax both local and out-of-State goods equally without discrimination against either and that, we think, is the only measure of protection which article 286 could reasonably be supposed to accord to interState sales or purchases, when it is construed in the light of articles 301 and 304.\nThe question next arises as to whether the, Act contravenes all or any of the restrictions imposed by article 286.\nIt is the respondents case that the sales and purchases made by them in Bombay, in the course of their business, include all the three categories excluded from the scope of State- taxation by article 286, and the Act seeking to bring all of them within its scheme of taxation is bad. It is, therefore, necessary to make a brief survey of the main provisions of the Act and of the rules made thereunder, in order to see whether the respondents complaint is well- founded, and, if so, whether the whole or any part of the Act is to be declared unconstitutional and void.\nThe Act provides for levy of two kinds of taxes, called the general tax and the special tax, by the two charging sections 5 and 10 respectively.\nDealer is defined in section 2 (7) as a person who carries on the business of selling goods in the State of Bombay whether for commission, remuneration or otherwise and includes a State Government which carries on such business and any society, club or association which sells goods to its members. The Expla- nation (2) to this definition provides that the manager or agent of a dealer who resides outside the State of Bombay and carries on the business of selling goods in the State of Bombay shall, in respect of such business, be deemed to be a dealer for the purpose of the Act.\nSale is defined by section 2 (14) with all 1091 its grammatical variations and cognate expressions as meaning any transfer of property in goods for cash or deferred payment or other valuable consideration and includes any supply by a society, a club, or an association to its members on payment of price or of fees or subscriptions but does not include a mortgage, hypothecation, charge or pledge.\nThe words buy and purchase are to be construed accordingly.\nThere are two Explanations attached to this definition of which the second, which is obviously based on the Explanation to clause (1) (a) of article, 286, provides that the sale of any goods which have actually been delivered in the State of Bombay as a direct result of such sale for the purpose of consumption in the said State, shall be deemed, for the purposes of this Act, to have taken place in the said State, irrespective of the fact that the property in the goods has, by reason of such sale, passed in another State.\nTurnover is defined by section 2(21) as the aggregate of the amounts of sale price received and receivable by a dealer in respect of any sale of goods made during a given period after deducting the amount, if any, refunded by the dealer to a purchaser in respect of any goods purchased and returned by the purchaser within the prescribed period. Section 5 imposes the general tax on every dealer whose turnover in respect of sales within the State of Bombay during any of the three consecutive years immediately preceding the first day of April, 1952, has exceeded Rs. 30,000 or whose turnover in respect of such sales exceeds the said limit during the year commencing on the first day of April, 1952.\n The tax is to be levied on his taxable turnover in respect of sales of goods made on or after the appointed day, i.e., 1st November, 1952, at the rate of 3 pies in the rupee (section 6).\nBy section 7 the taxable turnover is to be determined by first deducting from the turnover of the dealer in respect of all his sales of goods during any period of his liability to pay the general tax, his turnover during that period, in respect of (a) sales of any goods declared from time to time as tax-free under section 8 and(b) ,,such other sales as may be prescribed, No dealer 1092 liable to pay the general tax shall carry on business as a dealer unless he has applied for registration (section 9). \n A more or less similar scheme is provided for the levy of a special tax on the sale of certain special goods specified in Schedule II. By section 10 every dealer whose turnover in respect of sales of special goods made within the State of Bombay has exceeded Rs. 5,000 during the year ended 31st March, 1952, or exceeds the said limit during the year commencing from 1st April, 1952, is charged with a special tax at the rate specified in Schedule 11 on his taxable turnover in respect of the sales of special goods made on or after the appointed day, i.e., 1st November, 1952.\nBy section II the taxable turnover is to be determined by first deducting, from the turnover of the dealer in respect of his sales of special goods during any period of his liability, his turnover in respect of (a) sales of special goods purchased by him, on or after the appointed day at a place in the State of Bombay from a dealer holding a licence under section 12 and (b) such other sales as may be prescribed.\nEvery dealer liable to pay the special tax is required to obtain a licence as a condition of his carrying on his business (section 12).\n Then follow certain pro- visions for returns, assessment, payment and recovery of tax.\nOf these, Rules 5(1) and 6(1) are important, and they provide for the deduction of the following sales in calculating taxable turnover under section 7 (general tax) and section 11 (special tax) (1) sales which take place (a) in the course of the import of the goods into or export of the goods out of the territory of India or (b) in the course of inter-State trade or commerce. It is to be noted that these are the excluded categories of sales or purchases under article 286 (1) (b) and (2) respectively.\nRule 5(2) (1) requires, as a condition of the aforesaid deductions, that the goods should be consigned by certain specified modes of transport.\nClause (v) lays down a rule of presumption to be acted upon in the absence of evidence of actual consignment of the goods within three months of the sale, that the sale has not taken place in the course of export or of inter- State trade as the case may be.\nNow, it will be seen from the provisions summarised above that the Act does not in terms exclude from its purview the sales or purchases taking place outside the State of Bombay while it does include, by Explanation (2) to the definition of sale, the sales or purchases under which the delivery and consumption take place in Bombay which, by virtue of the Explanation to article 286(1)(a), are to be regarded as local 1094 sales or purchases.\nOn the construction we have placed upon that Explanation, sales or purchases effected in Bombay in respect of goods in Bombay but delivered for consumption outside Bombay are not taxable in Bombay.\nNow, the respondents complain that the latter category of sales or purchases thus held not to be taxable are not expressly excluded by the Act which, therefore, contravenes article 286 (1)(a). No doubt, there is no provision in the Act excluding in express terms sales of the kind referred to above, but neither is there any provision purporting to impose tax on such sales or purchases.\nOn the other hand, the two charging sections of the Act, section 5 and section 10, purport, in express terms, to impose the tax on all sales made within the State of Bombay, and section 18, which lays the tax on purchases, is limited in its operation to purchases of goods delivered to a buyer in the State of Bombay for consumption therein, that is to say, to purchases which unquestionably are taxable by Bombay according to both parties.\nThe charging sections cannot, therefore, be taken to cover the class of sales or purchases which, on our construction of the Explanation, are to be regarded as taking place outside the State of Bombay. \n We see no force, therefore, in the argument that the Act contravenes the provisions of article 286(1)(a) by purporting to charge sales or purchases excluded by that article from State- taxation.\nAs regards the other two categories of sales or purchases excluded by article 286(1)(b) and (2), it is true that the Act taken by itself does not provide for their exclusion.\nBut, as pointed out already, rules 5 and 6, which deal respectively with deduction of certain sales in calculating the taxable turnover under sections 7 and 11 exclude these two categories in express terms, and these rules were brought into force simultaneously with the charging sections 5 and 10 on November 1, 1952.\nThe position, therefore, was that, on the date -when the general tax and the special tax became leviable under the Act, sales or purchases of the kind described under article 286(1) (b) and (2) stood in fact excluded from taxation, and the State of 1095 Bombay cannot be considered to have made a law imposing or authorising the imposition of a tax on sales or purchases excluded under the aforesaid clauses of article 286.\nThe Act and the rules having been brought into operation simultaneously, there is no obvious reason why the rules framed in exercise of the power delegated by the Legislature should not be regarded as part of the law made by the State.\nThe position might be different if the rules had come into operation sometime later than the charging sections of the Act, for, in that case, it is arguable that if the legislation, without excluding the two classes of sales or purchases, was beyond the competence of the Legislature at the date when it was passed, the exclusion subsequently effected by the rules cannot validate such legislation.\nBut, as already stated, that is not the position here, and the learned Judges below fell into an error by overlooking this crucial fact when they say If the Legislature had no competence on the date the law was passed, the rules subsequently framed cannot confer competence on the Legislature.\nEven so, it was contended, the exclusion of the sales covered by clause (1)(b) and clause (2) of article 286 was hedged round with conditions and qualifications which neither the Legislature nor the rule-making authority was competent to impose on the exclusion and, therefore, such rules, even if read as part of the Act, could not cure the constitutional transgression. The conditions and qualifications complained of are mostly found to relate to mere matters of proof, e.g., rule 5(2), Explanation (2), which insists on the production of a certificate from an appropriate authority, before a motor vehicle, despatched to a place outside the State of Bombay by road and driven by its own power, could be exempted as an article sold in the course of interState trade.\nNo objection can reasonably be raised if the taxing authority insists on certain modes of proof being adduced before a claim to exclusion can be allowed.\nObjection was also taken to clause (1) of (1) 1951 S.C.R. 747. 1096 sub-rule (2) of rule 5 as imposing an unauthorised limi- tation upon the exemption of sales and purchases allowed by rule 5(1), that is to say, while rule 5(1)(1) (allows the deduction of the sales covered by clause (1) (b) and (2) of article 286 in calculating taxable turnover, sub-rule (2) (1) of the same rule provides that, in order to claim such deduction the goods shall be consigned only through a railway, shipping or aircraft company or country boat registered for carrying cargo or public motor transport service or by registered post. \n It is said that there is no reason why sales of goods despatched by other modes of transport should not also be deducted from the taxable turnover, because article 286 (2) in exempting sales in the course of inter-State trade, makes no distinction between modes of transport by which the goods are despatched.\nThis limitation, it was claimed, was beyond the competence of the rule-making authority.\nThe argument is not without force, and it must be held that rule 5(2)(1) is ultra vires the rule-making authority and therefore void. But it is clearly severable from rule 5(1)(1).\nThe restriction regarding the mode of transport of the goods sold or purchased in the course of inter-State trade, to which alone sub-rule (2)(1) relates, can be ignored and the exemption under rule 5(1)(1) may well be allowed to stand.\nFinally, Mr. Seervai attempted to make out that the provisions of the charging sections 5 and 10 fixing Rs. 30,000 and Rs. 5,000 as the minimum taxable turnover for general tax and special tax respectively were discriminatory and void under article 14 read with article 13 of the Constitution, and he gave us several tables of figures showing how the imposition of the tax actually works out in practice in hypothetical cases.\nIt is unnecessary to go into. the details of these cases which have been worked out in figures, for it must be conceded that the general effect of fixing these minimum limits must necessarily be to enable traders whose taxable turnover is below those limits to sell their goods at lower prices to their customers than dealers whose turnover exceeded 1097 those limits, for the latter have to add the sales-tax to the prices of their goods.\nBut no discrimination is involved in this classification which is perfectly reason-, able when it is borne in mind that the State may not consider it administratively worthwhile to tax sales by small traders who have no organisational facilities for collecting the tax from their buyers and turn it over to the Government.\nEach State must, in imposing a tax of this nature, fix its own limits below which it does not consider it administratively feasible or worthwhile to impose the tax. It is idle to suggest that any discrimination is involved in such classification.\nApart from the considerations set forth above which tend to support the constitutional validity of the Act, it was broadly contended before us that taxing statutes imposing tax on subjects divisible in their nature which do not exclude in express terms subjects exempted by the Constitution, should not, for that reason, be declared wholly ultra vires and void, for, in such cases, it is always feasible to separate taxes levied on authorised subjects from those levied on exempted subjects and to exclude the latter in the assessment of the tax.\nIn such cases, it is claimed, the statute itself should be allowed to stand, the taxing authority being prevented by injunction from imposing the tax on subjects exempted by the Constitution.\nOur attention was called to certain American cases where this principle has been consistently followed (see Bowman v. Continental Company(1), where all the pre- vious cases are collected).\nIn the present case the tax is imposed, in ultimate analysis, on receipts from individual sales or purchases of goods effected during the accounting period, and it is therefore possible to separate at the assessment the receipts derived from exempted sales or purchases and allow the State to enforce the statute with respect to the constitutionally taxable subjects, it being assumed that the State intends naturally to keep what it could lawfully tax, even where it purports to authorize the taxation of what is constitutionally exempt.\nOur attention was drawn to the decision of the Privy Council in Punjab Province v. Daulat Singh and Others(1) as condemnatory of this principle. The case is however, clearly distinguishable. Their Lordships were dealing with a Provincial enactment providing for the avoidance of benami transactions as therein specified and the question was whether it was ultra vires the Legislature as contravening section 298(1) of the Government of India Act, 1935, which forbade the prohibition, inter alia, of disposition of property by an Indian subject on certain grounds which included descent.\ntheir Lordships made the following observations which were strongly relied on before us The majority of the Federal Court appear to have contemplated another form of severability, namely, by a classification of the particular cases on which the impugned Act may happen to operate, involving an inquiry into the circumstances of each individual case. \n There are no words in the Act capable of being so construed, and such a course would in effect involve an amendment of the Act by the court, a course which is beyond the competency of the court, as has long been well established.\nThe subject of the constitutional prohibition was single and indivisible, namely, disposition of property on grounds only of (among other things) descent and if, in its actual operation, the impugned statute was found to transgress the constitutional mandate, the whole Act had to be held void as the words used (1) 1946 F.C.R. 1. (2) 1942 F.C.R. 67. 1099 covered both what was constitutionally permissible and what was not.\nThe same principle was applied by this court in the Cross Roads case(1). It was, indeed, applied also in Bowmans case(1) with respect to the licence tax imposed generally on the entire business conducted including inter- State commerce as well as domestic business, but was not applied, as stated above, with respect to excise tax which was laid on every gallon of gasolene sold and was thus divisible in its nature.\nIt is a sound rule to extend severability to include separability in enforcement in such cases, and we are of opinion that the principle should be applied in dealing with taxing statutes in this country, We accordingly set aside the declaration made by the court below and quash the writ issued by it except in regard to rule 5 (2) (1).\nAn injunction shall, however, issue restraining the appellants from imposing or authorising the imposition of a tax on sales and purchases which are exempted from taxation by article 286 as interpreted above.\nEach party will bear its own costs throughout.", + "expert_5": "The judgment of Patanjali Sastri C. J., Mukherjea and Ghulain Hasan JJ. was delivered by Patanjali Sastri C. J. Vivian Bose and Bhagwati JJ. delivered separate judgments.\nOn, the same day the rules made by the State Government in exercise of the power conferred by section 45 of the Act also came into force.\nConstitution makers the problem of restricting the taxing power on sales or purchases involving inter-State elements, and alleviating the tax burden on the consumer. At the same time they were evidently anxious to maintain the State power of imposing non-discriminatory taxes on goods imported from other States, while upholding the economic unity of India by providing for the freedom of inter-State trade and commerce. In their attempt to harmonise and achieve these somewhat conflicting objectives they enacted articles 286, 301 an 304.\n301, Subject to the other provisions of this Part, trade, commerce and intercourse throughout the territory of India shall be free.\nNotwithstanding anything in article 301 or article 303, the Legislature of a State may by law- (a) impose on goods imported from other States any tax to which similar goods manufactured or 1081 produced in that State are subject, so, however, as not to discriminate between goods so imported and goods,, so manufactured or produced and (b) impose such reasonable restrictions on the freedom of trade, commerce or intercourse with or within that State as may be required in the public interest Provided that no Bill or amendment for the purposes of clause (b) shall be introduced or moved in the Legislature of a State without the previous sanction of the President.\nthe principle of freedom of inter- State trade and commerce declared in article 301 is expressly subordinated to the State power of taxing goods imported from sister States, provided only no discrimination is made in favour of similar goods of local origin.\nthe commercial unity of India is made to give way before the State-power of imposing any non-dis- criminatory tax on goods imported from sister States.\nIt provides by means of a legal fiction that the State in which the goods sold or purchased are actually delivered for consumption therein is the State in which the sale or purchase is to be considered to have taken place, notwithstanding the property in such goods passed in another State.\nIt is really not necessary in the context to use the word only in the way suggested, for, when the Explanation says that a sale or purchase shall be deemed to have taken place in a particular State, it follows that it shall be deemed also to have taken place outside the other States. Nor can the non-obstante clause be understood as implying that, under the general law relating to the sale of goods, the passing of the property in the goods is the determining factor in locating a sale or purchase.\nNeither the Sale of Goods Act nor the common law relating to the sale of goods has anything to say as to what the situs of a sale is, though certain rules have been laid down for ascertaining the intention of the contracting parties as to when or under what conditions the property in the goods is to pass to the buyer.\nIn our opinion, the non-obstante clause was inserted in the Explanation simply with a view to make it clear beyond all possible doubt that it was immaterial where the property in the goods passed, as it might otherwise be regarded as indicative of the place of sale.\nWe are therefore of opinion that article 286 (1) (a) read with the Explanation prohibits taxation of sales 1085 or purchases involving inter-State elements by all States except the State in which the goods are delivered for the purpose of consumption therein in the wider sense explained above.\nWe are of opinion that the operation of clause (2) stands excluded as a result of the legal fiction enacted in the explanation, and the State in which the goods are actually delivered for consumption can impose tax on inter-State sales or purchases.\nin our Constitution the principle of freedom of inter-State trade and commerce is made to give way before the State-power of imposing non-discriminatory taxes on goods imported from other States.\nIn exercise of the powers conferred by this section, the State Government made and published rules called the Bombay Sales Tax Rules, 1952\nwhich were brought into force on the same day on which the charging sections 5 and 10 of the Act were also brought into force, namely, November 1, 1952.\nOf these, Rules 5(1) and 6(1) are important, and they provide for the deduction of the following sales in calculating taxable turnover under section 7 (general tax) and section 11 (special tax) (1) sales which take place (a) in the course of the import of the goods into or export of the goods out of the territory of India or (b) in the course of inter-State trade or commerce.\nIt is to be noted that these are the excluded categories of sales or purchases under article 286 (1) (b) and (2) respectively.\nRule 5(2) (1) requires, as a condition of the aforesaid deductions, that the goods should be consigned by certain specified modes of transport. Clause (v) lays down a rule of presumption to be acted upon in the absence of evidence of actual consignment of the goods within three months of the sale, that the sale has not taken place in the course of export or of inter- State trade as the case may be\nNow, it will be seen from the provisions summarised above that the Act does not in terms exclude from its purview the sales or purchases taking place outside the State of Bombay\nwhile it does include, by Explanation (2) to the definition of sale, the sales or purchases under which the delivery and consumption take place in Bombay which, by virtue of the Explanation to article 286(1)(a), are to be regarded as local 1094 sales or purchases.\nOn the construction we have placed upon that Explanation, sales or purchases effected in Bombay in respect of goods in Bombay but delivered for consumption outside Bombay are not taxable in Bombay.\nNo doubt, there is no provision in the Act excluding in express terms sales of the kind referred to above, but neither is there any provision purporting to impose tax on such sales or purchases.\nOn the other hand, the two charging sections of the Act, section 5 and section 10, purport, in express terms, to impose the tax on all sales made within the State of Bombay, and section 18, which lays the tax on purchases, is limited in its operation to purchases of goods delivered to a buyer in the State of Bombay for consumption therein, that is to say, to purchases which unquestionably are taxable by Bombay according to both parties.\nThe charging sections cannot, therefore, be taken to cover the class of sales or purchases which, on our construction of the Explanation, are to be regarded as taking place outside the State of Bombay.\nWe see no force, therefore, in the argument that the Act contravenes the provisions of article 286(1)(a) by purporting to charge sales or purchases excluded by that article from State- taxation.\nAs regards the other two categories of sales or purchases excluded by article 286(1)(b) and (2), it is true that the Act taken by itself does not provide for their exclusion.\nBut, as pointed out already, rules 5 and 6, which deal respectively with deduction of certain sales in calculating the taxable turnover under sections 7 and 11 exclude these two categories in express terms, and these rules were brought into force simultaneously with the charging sections 5 and 10 on November 1, 1952.\nThe position, therefore, was that, on the date -when the general tax and the special tax became leviable under the Act, sales or purchases of the kind described under article 286(1) (b) and (2) stood in fact excluded from taxation, and the State of 1095 Bombay cannot be considered to have made a law imposing or authorising the imposition of a tax on sales or purchases excluded under the aforesaid clauses of article 286.\nThe Act and the rules having been brought into operation simultaneously, there is no obvious reason why the rules framed in exercise of the power delegated by the Legislature should not be regarded as part of the law made by the State.\nThe position might be different if the rules had come into operation sometime later than the charging sections of the Act, for, in that case, it is arguable that if the legislation, without excluding the two classes of sales or purchases, was beyond the competence of the Legislature at the date when it was passed, the exclusion subsequently effected by the rules cannot validate such legislation.\nthe learned Judges below fell into an error by overlooking this crucial fact when they say If the Legislature had no competence on the date the law was passed, the rules subsequently framed cannot confer competence on the Legislature.\nit must be held that rule 5(2)(1) is ultra vires the rule-making authority and therefore void.\nBut it is clearly severable from rule 5(1)(1). The restriction regarding the mode of transport of the goods sold or purchased in the course of inter-State trade, to which alone sub-rule (2)(1) relates, can be ignored and the exemption under rule 5(1)(1) may well be allowed to stand.\nIt is unnecessary to go into. the details of these cases which have been worked out in figures, for it must be conceded that the general effect of fixing these minimum limits must necessarily be to enable traders whose taxable turnover is below those limits to sell their goods at lower prices to their customers than dealers whose turnover exceeded 1097 those limits, for the latter have to add the sales-tax to the prices of their goods. But no discrimination is involved in this classification which is perfectly reason-, able when it is borne in mind that the State may not consider it administratively worthwhile to tax sales by small traders who have no organisational facilities for collecting the tax from their buyers and turn it over to the Government.\nIn the present case the tax is imposed, in ultimate analysis, on receipts from individual sales or purchases of goods effected during the accounting period, and it is therefore possible to separate at the assessment the receipts derived from exempted sales or purchases and allow the State to enforce the statute with respect to the constitutionally taxable subjects, it being assumed that the State intends naturally to keep what it could lawfully tax, even where it purports to authorize the taxation of what is constitutionally exempt.\nOur attention was drawn to the decision of the Privy Council in Punjab Province v. Daulat Singh and Others(1) as condemnatory of this principle. The case is however, clearly distinguishable.\nThe majority of the Federal Court appear to have contemplated another form of severability, namely, by a classification of the particular cases on which the impugned Act may happen to operate, involving an inquiry into the circumstances of each individual case.\nThe same principle was applied by this court in the Cross Roads case(1). It was, indeed, applied also in Bowmans case(1) with respect to the licence tax imposed generally on the entire business conducted including inter- State commerce as well as domestic business, but was not applied, as stated above, with respect to excise tax which was laid on every gallon of gasolene sold and was thus divisible in its nature.\nIt is a sound rule to extend severability to include separability in enforcement in such cases, and we are of opinion that the principle should be applied in dealing with taxing statutes in this country, We accordingly set aside the declaration made by the court below and quash the writ issued by it except in regard to rule 5 (2) (1)." + }, + "1953_57": { + "expert_1": "This is an appeal by an assessee against a judgment and order of the High Court at Bombay delivered on a reference made by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. The Bombay High Court refused leave to appeal but the assessee obtained special leave from this Court.\nFirst, he said that as the bars and shares were brought into the business any withdrawl of them from the business must be dealt with along ordinary and well-known business lines, namely, that if a person withdraws an asset from a business he must account for it to the business at the marlet rate prevailing at the date of the withdrawl. He said that the mere fact that the appellant was the sole owner of the business can make no difference, for under the Act income is assessable under distinct heads and when we are working out the income of a business the rules applicable to business incomes must be applied whoever is the owner. His second contention was that if the act of withdrawl is at a time when the market price is higher than the cost price, then the State is deprived of a potential profit. He conceded that had the market rate been lower than the cost price, then the appellant would have been entitled to set off the loss on those transactions against his overall profit on the other transcations and thus obtain the advantage of a lower tax on the overall picture.\nWe are of opinion that the learned Attorney-Generals secound contention is unsound because, for income-tax purposes, each year is a self contained accounting period and we can only take into consideration income, profits and gains made in that year and are not concerned with potential profits which may be made in another year any more than we are with losses which may occur in the future. As regards the first contention, we are of opinion that the appellant was right in entering the cost value of the silver and shares at the date of the withdrawl, because it was not a business transcation and by that act the business made no profit or gain, nor did it sustain a loss, and the appellant derived no immediate pecuniary gain the State cannot tax them, for under the Income-tax Act the State has no power to tax a potential future advantage.\nAs this is a business, any wihtdrawl of the assets is a business matter and the only feasible way of regarding it in a business light is to enter\nthe market price at the date of the withdrawl and whether that happens to favour the assessee or the State is immaterial. We do not agree. It is well recognised that in revenue cases regard must be had to the substance of the transaction rather than to tis mere form. \nIn the present case disregarding technicalities it is impossible to get away from the fact that the business is owned and run by the assessee himself. In a such circumstances we are of opinion that it is wholly unreal and artificial to separate the business from its owner and treat them as if they were separate entities trading with each other and then by means of a fictional sale introduce a fictional profit which in truth and in fact is non-existent.\nWhat he chooses to do with the rice in his godown is no concern of the Income-tax department provided always that he does not sell it or otherwise make a profit out of it. He can consume it, or give it away, or just left it rot. why should it make a difference if instead of keeping two sets of books he keeps only one ? How cah he be said to have made an income personally or his business a profit, because he uses ten bags out of his godown for a feast for the marriage of his daughter? How can it make any difference whether the bags are shifted directly from the godown to the kitchen or from the godown to the shop and from the shop to the kitchen? And yet, when the reasoning of the learned Attorney- General is pushed to tis logical conclusion, the form of the transcation is of its essence and its taxable or not according to the route the rice takes from the godown to the wedding feast. In our opinion, it would make no difference if the man instead of giving the feast himself hands over the rice to his daughter as a gift for the marriage festivities of her son.\nThe appellants mehtod of book-keeping reflects the true position. As he makes his purchases he enters his stock at the cost price on one side of the accounts. At the close of the year he enters the value of any unsold stock at cost on the other side of the accounts thus cancelling out the entries relating to the same unsold stock earlier in the accounts and then that is carried forward as the opening balance in the next years accounts. This cancelling out of the unsold stock from both sides of the accounts leaves only the transactions on which there have been actual sales and gives the true and actual profits or loss on his years dealings. In the same way, the appellant has reflected the true state of his finances and given a truthful picture of the profit and loss in his business by entering the bullion and silver at cost when he withdrew them for a purely non-business purpose and utilised them in a transaction which brought him neither income nor profit nor gain.\nIn the present case, the assessees business received nothing in exchange for the withdrawl of the assets, neither money nor moneys worth, therefore the only fair way of treating the matter was to do just what the appellant did, namely to enter the price at which the assets were valued at the beginning of the year so that the entries would cancel each other out and level the business with neither a gain or a loss on those transcations. The learned Attorney-General contended that if that was allowed great loss would ensue to the State because all a man need do at the end of the year would be to withdraw all assets which had risen in value and leave only those which had depreciated and thus either show a loss or reduce his taxable profits.\nThis arguments can only prevail on the assumption that the State can tax potential profits because, except for that, the State would neither gain nor loss in a case of this kind. Had the assets been left where they were, they would have been valued at the end of the year as they were at the beginning, at the cost price and we would be a gain at some future indefinite date is mere guess work, for equal there might be loss.\nWe refrain from expressing any opinion about them, especially as they appear to reach different conclusions, the facts are not the same and the questions which arose on the facts there were not argued here. they raise matters of wider arose on the facts there were not argued here.\nThe question referred were - \n Whether in the circumstances of the case any income arose to the assessee as a result of the transfer of hsres and silver bars to the trustees?\nOur answer to the first question is that in the circumstances of this case no income arose to the appellant as a result of the transfer of the shares and silver bars to the trustees.\nThe appeal is allowed with costs.\nThis appeal by special leave from a judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay on a reference by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal under Section 66 (I) of the Indian Income-tax Act (XI of 1922) raises an interesting question as to the valuation of an asset withdrawn from the stock-in-trade of a running business.\nThe assessee kept his books of account on the mercantile basis and the method employed by him in the past for valuing the closing stock of his stock-in-trade was valuation at the cost price thereof. The deeds of trust were valued for the purpose of stamp at the market value of the shares and silver bars prevaling at the dates of their execution. The assessee however showed the transfer of these shares and silver bars to trustees in the books of account at the cost price thereof thus setting off the debit shown in respect of the same at the beginning of the year of account. He contended that the market value of the said shares and silver bars on which the stamp duty was based could not be basis for computing his income from stock-in-trade thus transferred. The Income-tax authorities did not accept this contention and assessed the profit at the difference between the cost price of the said shares and silver bars and the market value thereof at the date of their withdrawal from the business. the Income-tax Officer, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner as also the income-tax Appellate Tribunal rejected this contention of the assessee and the income-tax Appellate tribunal submitted at the instance of the assessee a case under Section 66 (I) of the Act referring the following two questions for the decision of the High Court - \n Wether in the circumstances of the case any income arose to the petitioner as a result of the transfer of shares and silver bars to the trustees? If the answer to the question (I) is in the affirmative, wether the method employed by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and upheld by the Appellate Tribunal in computing the petitioners income from the transfer is the purpose method for computing the income? The High Court answered both the question in the affirmative. It was not disputed before the Income-tax Act Appellate Tribunal that the shares transferred were the stock-in-trade of the business. As regards the silver bars the Tribunal found that the assessee had been making purchases and sales frequently and that the silver also was stock-in-trade and not a capital investment. Both the shares and the silver bars were thus part of the stock-in-trade of the business. they had been purchased by the assessee from time to time and formed part of the stock-intrade of the business and had been shown at the cost price thereof in the books of account of the previous years and also at the opening of the year of account. If the shares and the silver bars which were thus withdrawn from the stock-in-trade at the closing of the year of account, the value of these shares and silver bars would also have been shown at the cost price in accordance with the system of accounts maintained by the assessee.\nThe question however which falls to be determined is what is the effect of these assets having been withdrawn from the stock-in- trade of the business. So far as the business itself is concerned the asset which has been brought in is of a particular value at the date when it has been so brought in and it is then valued in the books of account at its cost. In the course of the business however the asset appreciates or depreciates in value in accordance with the fluctuations of the market. If the cost price basis is adopted for the valuation of stock- in-trade at the close of the year this appreciation or depreciation in the value as the case may be would not be reflected in the accounts. \n If however the market valued at the market value basis is adopted for such valuation, the asset on being valued at the market rate thereof at the close of the year might show a loss and this loss would be allowed by the Income-tax authorities in computing the profit or loss of the business. In either event, the assessee would have to carry over the asset in the books of account of the subsequent year at the valuation adopted at the close of the previous year and the valuation adopted at the close of the previous year and the assessee would not be allowed to change the basis valuation thus adopted unless he close to adopt at the end of the subsequent year or years valuation at the cost price thus realised and the profit or loss as the case may be, in regard to that asset and that profit or loss would be allowed by the Income-tax authorities in the computation of profit or loss of valuation would not however make any difference in the ultimate reslu. On the cost price basis of valuation all intermediate fluctuation of price during the interval between the bringing of the asset in the business and the realisation of it would be eliminated and the only thing considered in the accounts would be the difference and the price of the asset when it was brought into the business and the price thereof when the asset as at the close of every the fluctuation in the market value of the asset as at the close of every year of account a rectification would have to be made in the result of the trading of the previous year which was not correctly reflected in the accounts by reason of the assessee having adopted the market value obtaining at the close of the previous year as the value of the asset. This process of rectification would continue from year to year until the asset was realised on the sale of the asset would be brought into account in that year. the ultimate result of these operations so fas as the asset itself is concerned would be no different. \n Because if regard be had to the various fluctuations in the market value which have been reflected in the accounts of the intermediate period, what the business actually realised. The only advantage which the assessee obtains would be that he would be able to anticipate in a particular year the loss that may be made on the asset in the following year or years if the prices rose again.\nIs there any difference in the position when instead of the asset being realised it is withdrawn from the stock-intrade of the business? So far as the business is concerned the asset ceases to be a aprt of the stock-in-trade whether it is realised or is withdrawn from the stock-in-trade. the asset after it has been brought into the business appreciates or depreciates in value in accordance with the fluctuations of the market and that appreciated or depreciated asset continues to be a part of the stock-in-trade of the business until it is realised or withdrawn. This appreciation or depreciation in value is not reflected for the valuation of the stock-in-trade at the close of theyear of account, but is certainly reflected as above indicated in the books of account when the market value basis is adopted. In each case however the actual profit or loss to the business as the case may ne in relation to the price at which the asset was brought into the business would be determined at the date when the asset is realised. That would be the measure of the appreciation or depreciation in value of the asset which till then formed a aprt of the stock-in-trade of the business, and would also be the measure of the ultimate profit or loss as the case may be of the business in regard to that particular asset.\nWhen the asset is withdrawn from the stock-in-trade of the business the position in my opinion would be no different. So far as the business is concerned the asset would go out and cease to be a aprt of its stock-in-trade and this again would be the measure of the profit or loss as the case may be of the business qua that particular asset. To my mind it makes not the slightest difference whether an asset is realised in the course of the business or withdrawn from the stock-in-trade of the business. An asset which has appreciated or depreciated in value as the case may be in accordance with the fluctuation of the market ceases to be a aprt of the business, by the one process or the other. So far as the business is concerned it is entitled to credit in its goods account the price of that asset as ahs been realised by the sale thereof or the market value of that asset as at the date of its withdrawal. Looking at the matter from the assessees point of view also, it does not make any the slightest difference whether he realises the asset in the course of the business and utilises it in any manner he chooses. Having brought into the business an asset which was of a particular value at that time, he withdraws from the business that asset at time when it has appreciated or depreciated in value. The business would be entitled to the appreciation or depreciation in value of that asset in so far as the asset had become a part of the stock-in-trade of the business. When the asset is withdrawn by the assessee, the assessee obtains in his hands by reason of such withdrawal an asset which at the time of the withdrawal has appreciated or depreciated in values as the case may be in comparison with its vlaue at the time when it was brought into the business and the assessee on such withdrawal would be able to deal with or dispose of an asset which had thus appreciated or depreciated in value. \n In my opinion the manner of his dealing with the asset after he withdraws it from the stock-in-trade of the business is really immmaterial. What is material from the stock-in-trade of the business and that vlaue can only be determine by the market value of the asset as at the date of its withdrawal.\nThis argument however does not take into account the appreciation or the deprciation in the value of the asset on the date of the withdrawal as compared to its value when it was intially brought into business. It also doesnot take into account the fact that the assessee might have adopted the market value basis for valuation of stock-in-trade on hand at the close of the previous year or years of account. The entry on the debit side at the beginning of the year of account would not then represent the cost price of the asset but would represent the market valu of the asset at the close of previous year account. What would then be the rational basis on which the credit entry should be made at the date of withdrawal? Should it be the cost price of the asset which was not at all reflected in the accounts except at the intial stage when the asset was brought into the business or the market value of the asset when it was withdrawn? surely the method of account keeping cannot make any differences to actual position, whether an asset has apperciated or depreciated in value and what pofit or loss if any accrued to the business when tje asset was withdrawn from the stock-in-trade of the business.\nIf the assessee withdraws from the stock-in-trade of the business an asset which has thus appreciated or depreciated in value is there any justification whatever for debiting him with the cost price of that asset and not the market value of the asset as at the date of withdrawal? In the event of the asset having appreciated in value the assessee should be debited in his account with the appreciated market value of the asset inasmuch as he withdraws from the stock-in-trade of the business an asset has depreciated in value the assessee should certainly not be mulcted. He withdraws from the stock-in-trade of the business an asset which is of a depreciated value as compared with its value when it was brought inhto the business and he should not certainly be debited with a higher price even though it may be the cost price as appearing in the books of account according to the particular system of accounting adopted by the assessee.\nI am therefore definitely of the opinion that even in the case of withdrawal as in the case of the realisation of the asset the business is entitled to credit the goods account the market value of the asset as at the date of its withdrawl whatever be the method adopted by it for valuation of its stock-in-trade on hand at the close of a year of account.\nWith great respect to the learned Judges I do not see my way to agree with the reasoning of this judgment does not take count of the fact that at the date of the partition the assets which had been brought into the business at the earlier dates had depreciated in value and it was these depreciated assets which were the subject-matter of partition between the partners. Even if the partition be not treated as a sale it was a transer of property, the property of the firm being transferred to the individual partners thereof and each partner obtaining an absolute interest in the shares thus transferred to him by the firm was concerned it was certainly a transfer of the property to the individual partners and even as regards the partners themselves it was transfer of the interests of the partners inter se in the shares respectively transferred absolutely to each of them. If it were necessary to do so I would certainly say that the case was erroneously decided.", + "expert_2": "In this books the appellant credited the business with the cost price of the bars and shares so withdrawn and there lies the crux of the issue which we have to determine.\nAccording to the appellant, the act of withdrawl resulted in neither income nor profit nor gain either to himself or to his business, nor was it a business transcation, accordingly it was not taxable.\nThe learned Attorney-General raised two contentions. \nFirst, he said that as the bars and shares were brought into the business any withdrawl of them from the business must be dealt with along ordinary and well-known business lines, namely, that if a person withdraws an asset from a business he must account for it to the business at the marlet rate prevailing at the date of the withdrawl.\nAs regards the first contention, we are of opinion that the appellant was right in entering the cost value of the silver and shares at the date of the withdrawl, because it was not a business transcation and by that act the business made no profit or gain, nor did it sustain a loss, and the appellant derived no immediate pecuniary gain the State cannot tax them, for under the Income-tax Act the State has no power to tax a potential future advantage.\nIt is well recognised that in revenue cases regard must be had to the substance of the transaction rather than to tis mere form. \nIn the present case disregarding technicalities it is impossible to get away from the fact that the business is owned and run by the assessee himself. In a such circumstances we are of opinion that it is wholly unreal and artificial to separate the business from its owner and treat them as if they were separate entities trading with each other and then by means of a fictional sale introduce a fictional profit which in truth and in fact is non-existent.\nIn our opinion, it would make no difference if the man instead of giving the feast himself hands over the rice to his daughter as a gift for the marriage festivities of her son. The appellants mehtod of book-keeping reflects the true position. As he makes his purchases he enters his stock at the cost price on one side of the accounts. At the close of the year he enters the value of any unsold stock at cost on the other side of the accounts thus cancelling out the entries relating to the same unsold stock earlier in the accounts and then that is carried forward as the opening balance in the next years accounts. This cancelling out of the unsold stock from both sides of the accounts leaves only the transactions on which there have been actual sales and gives the true and actual profits or loss on his years dealings.\nIn the same way, the appellant has reflected the true state of his finances and given a truthful picture of the profit and loss in his business by entering the bullion and silver at cost when he withdrew them for a purely non-business purpose and utilised them in a transaction which brought him neither income nor profit nor gain.\nOur answer to the first question is that in the circumstances of this case no income arose to the appellant as a result of the transfer of the shares and silver bars to the trustees.\nThe assessee however showed the transfer of these shares and silver bars to trustees in the books of account at the cost price thereof thus setting off the debit shown in respect of the same at the beginning of the year of account. He contended that the market value of the said shares and silver bars on which the stamp duty was based could not be basis for computing his income from stock-in-trade thus transferred.\nSo far as the business itself is concerned the asset which has been brought in is of a particular value at the date when it has been so brought in and it is then valued in the books of account at its cost. In the course of the business however the asset appreciates or depreciates in value in accordance with the fluctuations of the market. If the cost price basis is adopted for the valuation of stock- in-trade at the close of the year this appreciation or depreciation in the value as the case may be would not be reflected in the accounts. \n If however the market valued at the market value basis is adopted for such valuation, the asset on being valued at the market rate thereof at the close of the year might show a loss and this loss would be allowed by the Income-tax authorities in computing the profit or loss of the business.\nThis appreciation or depreciation in value is not reflected for the valuation of the stock-in-trade at the close of theyear of account, but is certainly reflected as above indicated in the books of account when the market value basis is adopted. In each case however the actual profit or loss to the business as the case may ne in relation to the price at which the asset was brought into the business would be determined at the date when the asset is realised.\nIt was urged that the withdrawal of the asset from the stock-in-trade of the business was not a business operation and that an entry on the credit side crediting the cost price of the particular asset would therefore be enough. This argument however does not take into account the appreciation or the deprciation in the value of the asset on the date of the withdrawal as compared to its value when it was intially brought into business.\nIn the event of the asset having appreciated in value the assessee should be debited in his account with the appreciated market value of the asset inasmuch as he withdraws from the stock-in-trade of the business an asset has depreciated in value the assessee should certainly not be mulcted. He withdraws from the stock-in-trade of the business an asset which is of a depreciated value as compared with its value when it was brought inhto the business and he should not certainly be debited with a higher price even though it may be the cost price as appearing in the books of account according to the particular system of accounting adopted by the assessee. I am therefore definitely of the opinion that even in the case of withdrawal as in the case of the realisation of the asset the business is entitled to credit the goods account the market value of the asset as at the date of its withdrawl whatever be the method adopted by it for valuation of its stock-in-trade on hand at the close of a year of account.\nThe assessees having adopted the system of valuing the shares at cost price at the end of every year and the opening of the next year, the cost price of shares was taken to have been their value at the beginning of the year of account and the partition was taken as not amounting to a sale of the shares with the result that there was no evidence of any loss.\ndoes not take count of the fact that at the date of the partition the assets which had been brought into the business at the earlier dates had depreciated in value and it was these depreciated assets which were the subject-matter of partition between the partners. Even if the partition be not treated as a sale it was a transer of property, the property of the firm being transferred to the individual partners thereof and each partner obtaining an absolute interest in the shares thus transferred to him by the firm was concerned it was certainly a transfer of the property to the individual partners and even as regards the partners themselves it was transfer of the interests of the partners inter se in the shares respectively transferred absolutely to each of them.", + "expert_3": "The appellant deals in silver and shares and a substantial part of his holding is kept in silver bullion and shares. His business is run and owned by himself.\nHis accounts are maintained according to the mercantile system. It is admitted that under this system stocks can be valued in one of two ways and provided there is no variation in the method from year to year without the sanction of the Income-tax authorities an assessee can choose whichever method, that is to say, the cost price of the stock was wnterred at the beginning of the year and not its market value and similarly the cost price was again entered at the close of the year of any stock which was not disposed of during the yeaar. \nThe entries on the one side of the accounts at the beginning of the year thus balance those on the other in respect of these items with the result that so far as they are concerned the books show neither a profit nor a loss on them. This was the method regularly employed and it is admitted on all hands that this was permissible under this system of accounting.\nThe accounting year with which we are concerned is the calendar year 1942\nThe silver bars and shares lying with the appellant at the beginning of the year were valued at cost price. In the course of the year the appellant withdrew some bars and shares from the business and settled them on certain trusts, three in number.\nThe appellant was one of the beneficiaries in all the three trusts retaining to himself a reversionary life interest after the death of his wife who was given the first life interest. After certain other life interests the ultimate beneficiaries were charities. The appellant was the managing trustee expressly so created in two of the trusts and virtually so in the third\nIn this books the appellant credited the business with the cost price of the bars and shares so withdrawn and there lies the crux of the issue which we have to determine. There is no suggestion in this case that the bars and shares were withdrawn from the business otherwise than in good faith\nAccording to the appellant, the act of withdrawl resulted in neither income nor profit nor gain either to himself or to his business, nor was it a business transcation, accordingly it was not taxable. The learned Attorney-General raised two contentions. \nFirst, he said that as the bars and shares were brought into the business any withdrawl of them from the business must be dealt with along ordinary and well-known business lines, namely, that if a person withdraws an asset from a business he must account for it to the business at the marlet rate prevailing at the date of the withdrawl\nHe said that the mere fact that the appellant was the sole owner of the business can make no difference, for under the Act income is assessable under distinct heads and when we are working out the income of a business the rules applicable to business incomes must be applied whoever is the owner. His second contention was that if the act of withdrawl is at a time when the market price is higher than the cost price, then the State is deprived of a potential profit\nHe conceded that had the market rate been lower than the cost price, then the appellant would have been entitled to set off the loss on those transactions against his overall profit on the other transcations and thus obtain the advantage of a lower tax on the overall picture\nWe are of opinion that the learned Attorney-Generals secound contention is unsound because, for income-tax purposes, each year is a self contained accounting period and we can only take into consideration income, profits and gains made in that year and are not concerned with potential profits which may be made in another year any more than we are with losses which may occur in the future. As regards the first contention, we are of opinion that the appellant was right in entering the cost value of the silver and shares at the date of the withdrawl, because it was not a business transcation and by that act the business made no profit or gain, nor did it sustain a loss, and the appellant derived no immediate pecuniary gain the State cannot tax them, for under the Income-tax Act the State has no power to tax a potential future advantage. All it acn tax is income, profits and gains made in the relevant accounting year\nIt was conceded that if these assets had been sold at cost price the State could have claimed nothing, for a man cannot be compelled to make a profit out of any particular transcation. It was also conceded that if the silver and stocks had lain where they were, then again there would have been no advantage to the State because the appellant would have been entitled to enter their closing vlaues at cost at the end of the year.\nThe learned Attorney-General even conceded that if they had been sold at a loss the appellant would have been entitled to set that off agianst his other gains, but he said that is because all those are business transactions and that is the way the law deals with such matters when they occur in the ordinary course of business\nIt is well recognised that in revenue cases regard must be had to the substance of the transaction rather than to tis mere form\nIn the present case disregarding technicalities it is impossible to get away from the fact that the business is owned and run by the assessee himself. In a such circumstances we are of opinion that it is wholly unreal and artificial to separate the business from its owner and treat them as if they were separate entities trading with each other and then by means of a fictional sale introduce a fictional profit which in truth and in fact is non-existent. Cut away the fictions and you reach the position that the man is supposed to be selling to himself and thereby making a profit out of himself which on the lace of it is not only absurd but against all canons of mercantile and income-tax law. And worse.\nHe may keep it and not show a profit\nHe may sell it to another at a loss and cannot be taxed because he cannot be compelled to sell at a fictional profit when the market rises in order that he may be compelled to pay to Government a tax which is anything but fictional\nThe appellants mehtod of book-keeping reflects the true position. As he makes his purchases he enters his stock at the cost price on one side of the accounts. At the close of the year he enters the value of any unsold stock at cost on the other side of the accounts thus cancelling out the entries relating to the same unsold stock earlier in the accounts and then that is carried forward as the opening balance in the next years accounts. This cancelling out of the unsold stock from both sides of the accounts leaves only the transactions on which there have been actual sales and gives the true and actual profits or loss on his years dealings. In the same way, the appellant has reflected the true state of his finances and given a truthful picture of the profit and loss in his business by entering the bullion and silver at cost when he withdrew them for a purely non-business purpose and utilised them in a transaction which brought him neither income nor profit nor gain\nIn the present case, the assessees business received nothing in exchange for the withdrawl of the assets, neither money nor moneys worth, therefore the only fair way of treating the matter was to do just what the appellant did, namely to enter the price at which the assets were valued at the beginning of the year so that the entries would cancel each other out and level the business with neither a gain or a loss on those transcations.\nThe learned Attorney-General contended that if that was allowed great loss would ensue to the State because all a man need do at the end of the year would be to withdraw all assets which had risen in value and leave only those which had depreciated and thus either show a loss or reduce his taxable profits. This arguments can only prevail on the assumption that the State can tax potential profits because, except for that, the State would neither gain nor loss in a case of this kind. Had the assets been left where they were, they would have been valued at the end of the year as they were at the beginning, at the cost price and we would be a gain at some future indefinite date is mere guess work, for equal there might be loss. Apart, however, from that the learned Attorney- Generals rule is equally capable of abuse\nA man could as easily withdrawn from the business assets which had depreciated and enter in his books the deprecated market value and leave at cost price the assets which had risen\nThe question referred were - \n Whether in the circumstances of the case any income arose to the assessee as a result of the transfer of hsres and silver bars to the trustees? If the answer to question (I) is in afirmative, whether the method employed by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and upheld by the Appellate Tribunal in computing the assessees income from the transfer is the proper method for computing the income? Our answer to the first question is that in the circumstances of this case no income arose to the appellant as a result of the transfer of the shares and silver bars to the trustees. In view of that, the second question does not arise.", + "expert_4": "This is an appeal by an assessee against a judgment and order of the High Court at Bombay delivered on a reference made by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal.\nThe appellant deals in silver and shares and a substantial part of his holding is kept in silver bullion and shares.\nHis business is run and owned by himself.\nHis accounts are maintained according to the mercantile system.\nIt is admitted that under this system stocks can be valued in one of two ways and provided there is no variation in the method from year to year without the sanction of the Income-tax authorities an assessee can choose whichever method, that is to say, the cost price of the stock was wnterred at the beginning of the year and not its market value and similarly the cost price was again entered at the close of the year of any stock which was not disposed of during the yeaar.\nThe entries on the one side of the accounts at the beginning of the year thus balance those on the other in respect of these items with the result that so far as they are concerned the books show neither a profit nor a loss on them. This was the method regularly employed and it is admitted on all hands that this was permissible under this system of accounting.\nThe silver bars and shares lying with the appellant at the beginning of the year were valued at cost price.\nIn the course of the year the appellant withdrew some bars and shares from the business and settled them on certain trusts, three in number. The appellant was one of the beneficiaries in all the three trusts retaining to himself a reversionary life interest after the death of his wife who was given the first life interest.\nIn this books the appellant credited the business with the cost price of the bars and shares so withdrawn and there lies the crux of the issue which we have to determine.\nThere is no suggestion in this case that the bars and shares were withdrawn from the business otherwise than in good faith.\nAccording to the appellant, the act of withdrawl resulted in neither income nor profit nor gain either to himself or to his business, nor was it a business transcation, accordingly it was not taxable.\nThe learned Attorney-General raised two contentions. \nFirst, he said that as the bars and shares were brought into the business any withdrawl of them from the business must be dealt with along ordinary and well-known business lines, namely, that if a person withdraws an asset from a business he must account for it to the business at the marlet rate prevailing at the date of the withdrawl.\nHis second contention was that if the act of withdrawl is at a time when the market price is higher than the cost price, then the State is deprived of a potential profit.\nWe are of opinion that the learned Attorney-Generals secound contention is unsound because, for income-tax purposes, each year is a self contained accounting period and we can only take into consideration income, profits and gains made in that year and are not concerned with potential profits which may be made in another year any more than we are with losses which may occur in the future.\nAs regards the first contention, we are of opinion that the appellant was right in entering the cost value of the silver and shares at the date of the withdrawl, because it was not a business transcation and by that act the business made no profit or gain, nor did it sustain a loss, and the appellant derived no immediate pecuniary gain the State cannot tax them, for under the Income-tax Act the State has no power to tax a potential future advantage.\nIt is well recognised that in revenue cases regard must be had to the substance of the transaction rather than to tis mere form.\nIn the present case disregarding technicalities it is impossible to get away from the fact that the business is owned and run by the assessee himself. In a such circumstances we are of opinion that it is wholly unreal and artificial to separate the business from its owner and treat them as if they were separate entities trading with each other and then by means of a fictional sale introduce a fictional profit which in truth and in fact is non-existent.\nCut away the fictions and you reach the position that the man is supposed to be selling to himself and thereby making a profit out of himself which on the lace of it is not only absurd but against all canons of mercantile and income-tax law.\nAnd worse. He may keep it and not show a profit. He may sell it to another at a loss and cannot be taxed because he cannot be compelled to sell at a fictional profit when the market rises in order that he may be compelled to pay to Government a tax which is anything but fictional.\nConsider this simple illustration. A man trades in rice and also uses rice for his family consumption. the bags are all stored in one godown and he draws upon his stock as and when he finds it necessary to do so, now for his business, now for his own use. what he keeps for his own personal use cannot be taxed however much the market rises nor can he be taxed on what he gives away from his own personal stock, nor, so far as his shop is concerned, can he be compelled to sell at a profit. If he keeps two sets of books and enters in one all the bags which go into his personal godown and in the other the rice which is withdrawn from the godown into his customers so that only a negligible quantity is left over in the shop after each days sales, his private and personal dealings with the bags in his personal godown could not be taxed unless he sells them at a profit. What he chooses to do with the rice in his godown is no concern of the Income-tax department provided always that he does not sell it or otherwise make a profit out of it.\nIn our opinion, it would make no difference if the man instead of giving the feast himself hands over the rice to his daughter as a gift for the marriage festivities of her son.\nThe appellants mehtod of book-keeping reflects the true position. As he makes his purchases he enters his stock at the cost price on one side of the accounts.\nAt the close of the year he enters the value of any unsold stock at cost on the other side of the accounts thus cancelling out the entries relating to the same unsold stock earlier in the accounts and then that is carried forward as the opening balance in the next years accounts.\nThis cancelling out of the unsold stock from both sides of the accounts leaves only the transactions on which there have been actual sales and gives the true and actual profits or loss on his years dealings.\nIn the same way, the appellant has reflected the true state of his finances and given a truthful picture of the profit and loss in his business by entering the bullion and silver at cost when he withdrew them for a purely non-business purpose and utilised them in a transaction which brought him neither income nor profit nor gain.\nIn the present case, the assessees business received nothing in exchange for the withdrawl of the assets, neither money nor moneys worth, therefore the only fair way of treating the matter was to do just what the appellant did, namely to enter the price at which the assets were valued at the beginning of the year so that the entries would cancel each other out and level the business with neither a gain or a loss on those transcations.\nThe learned Attorney-General contended that if that was allowed great loss would ensue to the State because all a man need do at the end of the year would be to withdraw all assets which had risen in value and leave only those which had depreciated and thus either show a loss or reduce his taxable profits. This arguments can only prevail on the assumption that the State can tax potential profits because, except for that, the State would neither gain nor loss in a case of this kind.\nHad the assets been left where they were, they would have been valued at the end of the year as they were at the beginning, at the cost price and we would be a gain at some future indefinite date is mere guess work, for equal there might be loss.\nThere are two cases which bear a superficial resemblance to this case. \nThey are In the matter of Messrs. Chouthmal Golapchand (1938 6 ITR 733). and In re Spanish Prospecting company Limited (1911 I ch 92). We refrain from expressing any opinion about them, especially as they appear to reach different conclusions, the facts are not the same and the questions which arose on the facts there were not argued here. they raise matters of wider arose on the facts there were not argued here.\nThese cases were not cases of a business owned and run by a single owner and so the fiction of treating the business as a separate entity from its owner actually trading with him, which we are asked to apply here, does not arise.\nNeither case is in our opinion, apposite here.\nThe question referred were - \n Whether in the circumstances of the case any income arose to the assessee as a result of the transfer of hsres and silver bars to the trustees?\nIf the answer to question (I) is in afirmative, whether the method employed by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and upheld by the Appellate Tribunal in computing the assessees income from the transfer is the proper method for computing the income?\nOur answer to the first question is that in the circumstances of this case no income arose to the appellant as a result of the transfer of the shares and silver bars to the trustees. In view of that, the second question does not arise.\nThe appeal is allowed with costs.\nWhen the asset is withdrawn from the stock-in-trade of the business the position in my opinion would be no different.\nSo far as the business is concerned the asset would go out and cease to be a aprt of its stock-in-trade and this again would be the measure of the profit or loss as the case may be of the business qua that particular asset. To my mind it makes not the slightest difference whether an asset is realised in the course of the business or withdrawn from the stock-in-trade of the business.", + "expert_5": "There is no suggestion in this case that the bars and shares were withdrawn from the business otherwise than in good faith.\nHe conceded that had the market rate been lower than the cost price, then the appellant would have been entitled to set off the loss on those transactions against his overall profit on the other transcations and thus obtain the advantage of a lower tax on the overall picture.\nWe are of opinion that the learned Attorney-Generals secound contention is unsound because, for income-tax purposes, each year is a self contained accounting period and we can only take into consideration income, profits and gains made in that year and are not concerned with potential profits which may be made in another year any more than we are with losses which may occur in the future.\nAs regards the first contention, we are of opinion that the appellant was right in entering the cost value of the silver and shares at the date of the withdrawl, because it was not a business transcation and by that act the business made no profit or gain, nor did it sustain a loss, and the appellant derived no immediate pecuniary gain the State cannot tax them, for under the Income-tax Act the State has no power to tax a potential future advantage.\nAll it acn tax is income, profits and gains made in the relevant accounting year.\nIt was conceded that if these assets had been sold at cost price the State could have claimed nothing, for a man cannot be compelled to make a profit out of any particular transcation. It was also conceded that if the silver and stocks had lain where they were, then again there would have been no advantage to the State because the appellant would have been entitled to enter their closing vlaues at cost at the end of the year.\nThe learned Attorney-General even conceded that if they had been sold at a loss the appellant would have been entitled to set that off agianst his other gains\nWe do not agree.\nIt is well recognised that in revenue cases regard must be had to the substance of the transaction rather than to tis mere form.\nIn the present case disregarding technicalities it is impossible to get away from the fact that the business is owned and run by the assessee himself.\nIn a such circumstances we are of opinion that it is wholly unreal and artificial to separate the business from its owner and treat them as if they were separate entities trading with each other and then by means of a fictional sale introduce a fictional profit which in truth and in fact is non-existent.\nCut away the fictions and you reach the position that the man is supposed to be selling to himself and thereby making a profit out of himself which on the lace of it is not only absurd but against all canons of mercantile and income-tax law.\nAnd worse. He may keep it and not show a profit. He may sell it to another at a loss and cannot be taxed because he cannot be compelled to sell at a fictional profit when the market rises in order that he may be compelled to pay to Government a tax which is anything but fictional.\nAnd yet, when the reasoning of the learned Attorney- General is pushed to tis logical conclusion, the form of the transcation is of its essence and its taxable or not according to the route the rice takes from the godown to the wedding feast.\nIn our opinion, it would make no difference if the man instead of giving the feast himself hands over the rice to his daughter as a gift for the marriage festivities of her son.\nThe appellants mehtod of book-keeping reflects the true position. As he makes his purchases he enters his stock at the cost price on one side of the accounts. At the close of the year he enters the value of any unsold stock at cost on the other side of the accounts thus cancelling out the entries relating to the same unsold stock earlier in the accounts and then that is carried forward as the opening balance in the next years accounts. This cancelling out of the unsold stock from both sides of the accounts leaves only the transactions on which there have been actual sales and gives the true and actual profits or loss on his years dealings. In the same way, the appellant has reflected the true state of his finances and given a truthful picture of the profit and loss in his business by entering the bullion and silver at cost when he withdrew them for a purely non-business purpose and utilised them in a transaction which brought him neither income nor profit nor gain.\nIn the present case, the assessees business received nothing in exchange for the withdrawl of the assets, neither money nor moneys worth, therefore the only fair way of treating the matter was to do just what the appellant did, namely to enter the price at which the assets were valued at the beginning of the year so that the entries would cancel each other out and level the business with neither a gain or a loss on those transcations.\nThis arguments can only prevail on the assumption that the State can tax potential profits because, except for that, the State would neither gain nor loss in a case of this kind. Had the assets been left where they were, they would have been valued at the end of the year as they were at the beginning, at the cost price and we would be a gain at some future indefinite date is mere guess work, for equal there might be loss.\nthe learned Attorney- Generals rule is equally capable of abuse. A man could as easily withdrawn from the business assets which had depreciated and enter in his books the deprecated market value and leave at cost price the assets which had risen.\nin the circumstances of this case no income arose to the appellant as a result of the transfer of the shares and silver bars to the trustees. In view of that, the second question does not arise. The appeal is allowed with costs." + }, + "1953_74": { + "expert_1": "This is appeal from the Judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay delivered on a reference under Section 66(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, whereby the High Court answered the first referred question in the negative\nIt was contended that the assessee being a person resident in India, Section 42 could not be invoked in the case, because that section had application only to cases of non-resident.\nAt the instance of the Commissioner of Income-tax Excess Profits Tax, Bombay City, three question were referred to the High Court under Section 66(1), the first of these being - Whether in the circumstances of the case can the profits on the sale of goods in the Mysore State be deemed to accrue or arise in British India under Section 42(1) of the India Income-tax Act. The High Court returned an answer to the question in the negative after resettling it in these terms - Whether on the facts and the circumstances of the case the Income-tax Officer was right in applying the provision of Section 42(1) of the Income-tax Act and holding that Rs. 37,500 were profits deemed to accrue in British India and in including in the assessment a portion thereof. \nThis appeal is before us on a certificate granted by the High Court and the only question canvassed here is whether Section 42(1) of the India Income-tax Act has application to the case of a resident assessee or whether its scope be limited to non-resident assessee alone.\nIt is common ground that if Section 42 of the Act has no application to the case of a resident assessee the whole of the Mysore profit, namely Rs. 75,000 cannot be included in the assessment of the year 1943-44. On the other hand, if such an assessee is within the ambit of the section, in that event the sum R s. 37,500 or any part of it would be liable to assessment during the assessment year in question.\nIt further provided that the income, profits and gains accruing or arising without British India to a person resident in British India shall, if they are received in or brought into British India, be deemed to have accrued or arisen in British India and to be income, profits and gains of the year in which they are so received or brought, notwithstanding the fact that they did not so accrued or arise in that year.\nBy the amendment in the year 1939, the total income of any previous year of any person was defined as including all income, profits and gains from whatever source derived which \n (a) are received or are deemed to be received in British India in such year by or on behalf of such person, or\n (b) if such person is resident in British India during such year, - \n accrue or arise or are deemed to accrue or arise to him in British India during such year or\n accrue or arise to him without British India during such year or \n (c) if such person in sot resident in British India during such year, accrue or arise or are deemed to accrue or arise to him in British India during such year \n This legislative change in the Act made all income accruing or arising or deemed to accrue or arise in British India during the previous year to a resident the subject to charge, apart from income accruing or arising without British India during the previous year. The term deemed brings within the net of chargeability income not actually accruing but which is supposed nationally to have accrued.\nThe tax shall not be payable by an assessee in respect of any income, profits or gains accruing or arising to him within a Part B State, unless such income, profits or gains are received or deemed to be received in or are brought into the taxable territories in the previous year by or on behalf of the assessee, or are assessable under Section 12-B or Section 42.\nIn view of these legislative changes in the provisions of Section 4, 14 and 42 of the Act, the conclusion is irresistible that the object or recasting Section 42(1) in general terms was to make the definition of deemed income given in the section generally applicable to all classes of assessees. This sub-section has been drafted in the widest terms and there is nothing whatsoever in its language to suggest that its operation is confined to non-residents only. Wherever the legislature intended to limit the operation of any part of this section to non-residents alone, it said so in express terms. Sub- section (2) and the latter portion of sub-section (1) expressly concern themselves with the case of non-residents, while sub-section (1) and (3) are so framed that they cover both residents and non- residents.\nIt seems to us that any other construction of the section would create an anomaly, inasmuch as the Part B State income falling under Section 42 would not be assessable in the hands of a resident, but it would be assessable in the hands of a non-resident, because the Income-tax Act, while it ropes in world income of a resident exempts income accruing within the Part B States from its ambit, except when such income is received or is brought into taxable territory or comes within the ambit of Section 42. \nSuch a construction would be contrary to the policy of the Act.\nIn Sutlej Cotton Mills Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-tax, West Bengal, a Bench of the Calcutta High Court considered this matter at some length and reached the decision the sub-sections (1) and (3) of Section 42 covered cases of both residents as well as non-residents.\nIt is noteworthy that the first part of sub-section (1) of Section 42 providing that certain classes of income are to be deemed to accrue or arise in British India is not confined in its application to non- residents, but is in general terms so as to be applicable to both residents and non-residents. Before its amendment in 1939 the sub- section began with the words in the case of any person residing out of British India which obviously restricted the application of the provision to non-resident persons, but in its amended form the sub- section has been recast into two distinct parts, the first of which is not so restricted, and the second part alone, which begins with the words and where the person entitled to the income, profits and gains is not resident in British India, is made applicable to non-resident persons, thereby showing that the former part applies to both residents and non-residents. The opening words of the first proviso also point to the same conclusion, for these words would be supplusage it the sub-section as a whole applied only to non-residents.\nAs pointed out by the Privy Council in Balraj Kunwar v. Jagatpal Singh, marginal notes in an Indian statute, as in an Act of Parliament, cannot be referred to for the purpose of construing the statute, and it may be mentioned in this connection that the marginal note relied on has since been replaced by the words Income deemed to accrue or arise within British India which makes it clear that the main object of sub-section (I) was to define that expression see Section 12(a) of Act XXII of 1947.\nNor can the title of a chapter be legitimately used to restrict the plain terms of an enactment.\nNothing that has been said by Mr. Kolah before us justifies reconsideration of these opinions.\nMr. Kolah argued that when the world income of a resident was brought within the net of chargeability by Section 4 in 1939 it was then wholly unnecessary to include such an assessee in the ambit of Section 42.\nIn our judgment, this contention is fallacious.\nWhatever income arises in a primary sense to a resident in the taxable territories is chargeable under Section 4(1)(b)(i). Hence it was necessary to make Section 42 applicable to such a case. Whatever other consideration may arise in estimating the foreign income of a resident will not be applicable to income deemed to accrue within the taxable territory. Moreover, as above pointed out, in view of the provisions of Section 14(2)(c), resident assessees, but for Section 42(1), would not be liable to assessment regarding income accruing to them in Part B States, even if there is a business connection in the taxable territory.\nMr. Kolan was unable to suggest any reasonable explanation for the deletion of the words any person residing out of British India from Section 42(1) as it stood before 1939. The only purpose in deleting these words could be to bring residents within the ambit of the section. There is no reason whatsoever for not giving to the palin words of the section the meaning that on the face of it they bear.\nFor the reasons given above we are of the opinion that the answer re turned by the High Court of Bombay to the first question referred to it was wrong.", + "expert_2": "Section 42(1) of the India Income-tax Act has application to the case of a resident assessee or whether its scope be limited to non-resident assessee alone.\nThe rest of the section was substantially in the same termes. In spite of its amendment in 1939 the marginal note to the section continued to refer to non-resident as before, though the words residing out of British India were deleted from the body of sub-section (1). The retention of this marginal note gave rise to conflicting decision on the question whether the section in spite of the chang made in its language in 1939 still continued to have application to cases of non- resident alone. In order to clarify this matter, by Act XXII of 1947 the magical note was amended and it now is in these terms - Income deemed to accrue or arise within British India. It is significant that the changes made in Section 42 in the year 1939 were consequential to the entire recasting of Section 4 of the Act.\nThe term deemed brings within the net of chargeability income not actually accruing but which is supposed nationally to have accrued.\nBy statutory fiction income which can in no sense be said to accrue at all may be considered as so accruing. Similarly, the fiction may relate to the place, the person or be in respect of the year of taxability. Section 42(1) defines what income is deemed to accrue within the taxable territories. It is only by application of this definition that one class of income deemed to accrue to a resident within the taxable territories within the meaning of Section 4(1)(b)(i) can be estimated.\nIn view of these legislative changes in the provisions of Section 4, 14 and 42 of the Act, the conclusion is irresistible that the object or recasting Section 42(1) in general terms was to make the definition of deemed income given in the section generally applicable to all classes of assessees. This sub-section has been drafted in the widest terms and there is nothing whatsoever in its language to suggest that its operation is confined to non-residents only. Wherever the legislature intended to limit the operation of any part of this section to non-residents alone, it said so in express terms.\nIt seems to us that any other construction of the section would create an anomaly, inasmuch as the Part B State income falling under Section 42 would not be assessable in the hands of a resident, but it would be assessable in the hands of a non-resident, because the Income-tax Act, while it ropes in world income of a resident exempts income accruing within the Part B States from its ambit, except when such income is received or is brought into taxable territory or comes within the ambit of Section 42. \nSuch a construction would be contrary to the policy of the Act.\nSutlej Cotton Mills Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-tax, West Bengal, a Bench of the Calcutta High Court considered this matter at some length and reached the decision the sub-sections (1) and (3) of Section 42 covered cases of both residents as well as non-residents.\nWhatever income arises in a primary sense to a resident in the taxable territories is chargeable under Section 4(1)(b)(i). Hence it was necessary to make Section 42 applicable to such a case. Whatever other consideration may arise in estimating the foreign income of a resident will not be applicable to income deemed to accrue within the taxable territory. Moreover, as above pointed out, in view of the provisions of Section 14(2)(c), resident assessees, but for Section 42(1), would not be liable to assessment regarding income accruing to them in Part B States, even if there is a business connection in the taxable territory.", + "expert_3": "This is appeal from the Judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay delivered on a reference under Section 66(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, whereby the High Court answered the first referred question in the negative. The assessment in question concern the year 1943-44\nA Hindu undivided family was carrying on business in Bombay, Madras and the Mysore State. Its business was taken over by a registered firm on March 17, 1942\nThe case has been dealt with on the assumption that a single assessee carried on business from October 10, 1948, to November 8, 1942, the relevant accounting year. According to the accounts of the assessee, during this period the Mysore branch purchased goods from the Bombay head office and the Madras branch of the value of Rs. 2,45,455.\nThe Income-tax Officer estimated these purchases of the Mysore branch in British India at Rs. 3,00,000 and its profits at Rs. 75,000 on the sale of these goods in Mysore\nIn view of the provisions of Section 42 of the Act half of this profit, i.e., to the extent of Rs. 37,500, was deemed to accrue or a rise in British India, because of the business connection of the non-resident branch in British India\nIt was contended that the assessee being a person resident in India, Section 42 could not be invoked in the case, because that section had application only to cases of non-resident. \nThe Income-tax Tribunal following the decision of the Bombay High Court in Commissioner of Income-tax v. Western India Life Assurance Co., Ltd., upheld this contention, and ruled that no part of the Mysore profit could be taxed in British India\nAt the instance of the Commissioner of Income-tax Excess Profits Tax, Bombay City, three question were referred to the High Court under Section 66(1), the first of these being - Whether in the circumstances of the case can the profits on the sale of goods in the Mysore State be deemed to accrue or arise in British India under Section 42(1) of the India Income-tax Act. The High Court returned an answer to the question in the negative after resettling it in these terms - Whether on the facts and the circumstances of the case the Income-tax Officer was right in applying the provision of Section 42(1) of the Income-tax Act and holding that Rs. 37,500 were profits deemed to accrue in British India and in including in the assessment a portion thereof.\nThis appeal is before us on a certificate granted by the High Court and the only question canvassed here is whether Section 42(1) of the India Income-tax Act has application to the case of a resident assessee or whether its scope be limited to non-resident assessee alone. It is common ground that if Section 42 of the Act has no application to the case of a resident assessee the whole of the Mysore profit, namely Rs. 75,000 cannot be included in the assessment of the year 1943-44. On the other hand, if such an assessee is within the ambit of the section, in that event the sum R s. 37,500 or any part of it would be liable to assessment during the assessment year in question\nSection 42 of the Act is in these terms - \n All income, profits or gains accruing or arising, whether directly or indirectly, through or from any business connection in the taxable territories, or through or from any property in the taxable territories, or through or from any asset or source of income in the taxable territories, or through or from any money lent at interest and brought into the taxable territories in cash or in kind or through or from the sale, exchange or transfer of a capital asset in the taxable territories, shall be deemed to be income accruing or arising within the taxable territories, and were the person entitled to the income, profits or gains is not resident in the taxable territories, shall be chargeable to income-tax either in his name or in the name of his agent and in the latter case such agent shall be deemed to be, for all the purposes of this Act, the assessee in respect of such income-tax \n Provided that where the person entitle to the income, profits or gains is not resident in the taxable territories, the income-tax so chargeable nay be recovered by deduction under any of the provisions of Section 18 and that any arrears of tax may be recovered also in accordance with the provision of this Act from any assets of the non- resident person which are, or may at any time come within the taxable territories \n Provided further that any such agent, or any person who apprehends that he may be assessed as such an agent, may retain out of any money payable by him to such non-resident person a sum equal to his estimated liability under this sub-section, and in the event of any disagreement between the non-resident person and such agent or person as to the amount to be so retained, such agent or person may secure from the Income-tax Officer a certificate stating the amount to be so retained pending final settlement of the certificate so obtained shall be his warrant for retaining that amount \n Provided further that the amount recoverable from such agent or person at the time of final settlement shall not exceed the amount specified in such certificate except to the extent to which such agent or person may at such time have in his hands additional assets of such non- resident person. Where a person not resident or not ordinarily resident in the taxable territories carries on business with a person resident in the taxable territories, and it appears to the Income-tax Officer, that owing to the close connection between such persons the course of business is so arranged that the business done by the resident person with the person not resident or not ordinarily resident produces to the resident either no profits or less than the ordinary profits which might be expected to arise in that business, the profits derived therefrom or which may reasonably be deemed to have been derived therefrom, shall be chargeable to income-tax in the purposes of this Act, the assessee in respect of such income-tax\nIn the case of a business of which all the operations are not carried out in the taxable territories the profits and gains of the business deemed under this section to accrue or arise in the taxable territories shall be only such profits and gains as are reasonably attributable to that part of the operations carried out in the taxable territories\nBefore its amendment in the year 1939 the first part of the section ran thus - 42. (1) In the case of any person residing out of British India, all profits or gains accruing or arising to such person, whether directly or indirectly, through or from any business connection or property in British India, shall be deemed to be income accruing or arising within British India, and shall be chargeable to income-tax in the name of the agent of any such person, and such agent shall be deemed to be, for all the purposes of this Act, the assessee in respect of such income- tax . The rest of the section was substantially in the same termes.\nIn spite of its amendment in 1939 the marginal note to the section continued to refer to non-resident as before, though the words residing out of British India were deleted from the body of sub-section (1)\nThe retention of this marginal note gave rise to conflicting decision on the question whether the section in spite of the chang made in its language in 1939 still continued to have application to cases of non- resident alone. In order to clarify this matter, by Act XXII of 1947 the magical note was amended and it now is in these terms - Income deemed to accrue or arise within British India.\nIt is significant that the changes made in Section 42 in the year 1939 were consequential to the entire recasting of Section 4 of the Act.\nSection 4 as it stood prior to 1939 charged income-tax on all income, profits or gains, from whatever source derived, accruing or arising, or received in British India or deemed under the provisions of the Act to accrue, or arise, or to be received in British India. It further provided that the income, profits and gains accruing or arising without British India to a person resident in British India shall, if they are received in or brought into British India, be deemed to have accrued or arisen in British India and to be income, profits and gains of the year in which they are so received or brought, notwithstanding the fact that they did not so accrued or arise in that year\nBy the amendment in the year 1939, the total income of any previous year of any person was defined as including all income, profits and gains from whatever source derived which \n (a) are received or are deemed to be received in British India in such year by or on behalf of such person, or\n (b) if such person is resident in British India during such year, - \n accrue or arise or are deemed to accrue or arise to him in British India during such year or\n accrue or arise to him without British India during such year or \n (c) if such person in sot resident in British India during such year, accrue or arise or are deemed to accrue or arise to him in British India during such year \n This legislative change in the Act made all income accruing or arising or deemed to accrue or arise in British India during the previous year to a resident the subject to charge, apart from income accruing or arising without British India during the previous year.\nThe term deemed brings within the net of chargeability income not actually accruing but which is supposed nationally to have accrued.\nBy statutory fiction income which can in no sense be said to accrue at all may be considered as so accruing\nSimilarly, the fiction may relate to the place, the person or be in respect of the year of taxability. Section 42(1) defines what income is deemed to accrue within the taxable territories\nIt is only by application of this definition that one class of income deemed to accrue to a resident within the taxable territories within the meaning of Section 4(1)(b)(i) can be estimated\nThe words In the case of any person residing out of British India were deleted from Section 42(1) during the tendency of the amendment bill of 1939 in the Council of State presumably with the object of making the section application to any person who had any income which in a primary sense arose in British India, even though technically it had arisen abroad, irrespective of the circumstance whether that person was resident, ordinarily resident or not ordinarily resident. By Section 8 of Act XXIII of 1941, clause (c) was added to Section 14 of the Act\nNo effect was to be given to this amendment before the year ending March 31, 1943. \nThe relevant part of Section 14 after this amendment is in these terms - The tax shall not be payable by an assessee in respect of any income, profits or gains accruing or arising to him within a Part B State, unless such income, profits or gains are received or deemed to be received in or are brought into the taxable territories in the previous year by or on behalf of the assessee, or are assessable under Section 12-B or Section 42.\nIn view of these legislative changes in the provisions of Section 4, 14 and 42 of the Act, the conclusion is irresistible that the object or recasting Section 42(1) in general terms was to make the definition of deemed income given in the section generally applicable to all classes of assessees\nThis sub-section has been drafted in the widest terms and there is nothing whatsoever in its language to suggest that its operation is confined to non-residents only. Wherever the legislature intended to limit the operation of any part of this section to non-residents alone, it said so in express terms.\nSub- section (2) and the latter portion of sub-section (1) expressly concern themselves with the case of non-residents, while sub-section (1) and (3) are so framed that they cover both residents and non- residents\nnotwithstanding its amendment in 1939 the section applied only to non-residents\nIt seems to us that any other construction of the section would create an anomaly, inasmuch as the Part B State income falling under Section 42 would not be assessable in the hands of a resident, but it would be assessable in the hands of a non-resident, because the Income-tax Act, while it ropes in world income of a resident exempts income accruing within the Part B States from its ambit, except when such income is received or is brought into taxable territory or comes within the ambit of Section 42. \nSuch a construction would be contrary to the policy of the Act\nreached the decision the sub-sections (1) and (3) of Section 42 covered cases of both residents as well as non-residents.\nIt is noteworthy that the first part of sub-section (1) of Section 42 providing that certain classes of income are to be deemed to accrue or arise in British India is not confined in its application to non- residents, but is in general terms so as to be applicable to both residents and non-residents.\nin its amended form the sub- section has been recast into two distinct parts, the first of which is not so restricted, and the second part alone, which begins with the words and where the person entitled to the income, profits and gains is not resident in British India, is made applicable to non-resident persons, thereby showing that the former part applies to both residents and non-residents. The opening words of the first proviso also point to the same conclusion, for these words would be supplusage it the sub-section as a whole applied only to non-residents.\nThe facts that the marginal note to the whole section refers to non-residents and that the section itself finds a place in Chapter V headed Liability in special cases were relied upon as supporting the view that sub-section (I) as a whole applies only to non-residents\nmarginal notes in an Indian statute, as in an Act of Parliament, cannot be referred to for the purpose of construing the statute, and it may be mentioned in this connection that the marginal note relied on has since been replaced by the words Income deemed to accrue or arise within British India which makes it clear that the main object of sub-section (I) was to define that expression see Section 12(a) of Act XXII of 1947\nNor can the title of a chapter be legitimately used to restrict the plain terms of an enactment\nWhatever income arises in a primary sense to a resident in the taxable territories is chargeable under Section 4(1)(b)(i). Hence it was necessary to make Section 42 applicable to such a case. Whatever other consideration may arise in estimating the foreign income of a resident will not be applicable to income deemed to accrue within the taxable territory\nin view of the provisions of Section 14(2)(c), resident assessees, but for Section 42(1), would not be liable to assessment regarding income accruing to them in Part B States, even if there is a business connection in the taxable territory.\nreasonable explanation for the deletion of the words any person residing out of British India from Section 42(1) as it stood before 1939. The only purpose in deleting these words could be to bring residents within the ambit of the section. There is no reason whatsoever for not giving to the palin words of the section the meaning that on the face of it they bear\nFor the reasons given above we are of the opinion that the answer re turned by the High Court of Bombay to the first question referred to it was wrong.", + "expert_4": "This is appeal from the Judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay delivered on a reference under Section 66(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, whereby the High Court answered the first referred question in the negative.\nAccording to the accounts of the assessee, during this period the Mysore branch purchased goods from the Bombay head office and the Madras branch of the value of Rs. 2,45,455. The Income-tax Officer estimated these purchases of the Mysore branch in British India at Rs. 3,00,000 and its profits at Rs. 75,000 on the sale of these goods in Mysore.\nThe Income-tax Tribunal following the decision of the Bombay High Court in Commissioner of Income-tax v. Western India Life Assurance Co., Ltd., upheld this contention, and ruled that no part of the Mysore profit could be taxed in British India. At the instance of the Commissioner of Income-tax Excess Profits Tax, Bombay City, three question were referred to the High Court under Section 66(1), the first of these being - Whether in the circumstances of the case can the profits on the sale of goods in the Mysore State be deemed to accrue or arise in British India under Section 42(1) of the India Income-tax Act.\nThe High Court returned an answer to the question in the negative after resettling it in these terms - Whether on the facts and the circumstances of the case the Income-tax Officer was right in applying the provision of Section 42(1) of the Income-tax Act and holding that Rs. 37,500 were profits deemed to accrue in British India and in including in the assessment a portion thereof.\nThis appeal is before us on a certificate granted by the High Court and the only question canvassed here is whether Section 42(1) of the India Income-tax Act has application to the case of a resident assessee or whether its scope be limited to non-resident assessee alone.\nIt is common ground that if Section 42 of the Act has no application to the case of a resident assessee the whole of the Mysore profit, namely Rs. 75,000 cannot be included in the assessment of the year 1943-44. On the other hand, if such an assessee is within the ambit of the section, in that event the sum R s. 37,500 or any part of it would be liable to assessment during the assessment year in question.\nSection 42 of the Act is in these terms - \n All income, profits or gains accruing or arising, whether directly or indirectly, through or from any business connection in the taxable territories, or through or from any property in the taxable territories, or through or from any asset or source of income in the taxable territories, or through or from any money lent at interest and brought into the taxable territories in cash or in kind or through or from the sale, exchange or transfer of a capital asset in the taxable territories, shall be deemed to be income accruing or arising within the taxable territories, and were the person entitled to the income, profits or gains is not resident in the taxable territories, shall be chargeable to income-tax either in his name or in the name of his agent and in the latter case such agent shall be deemed to be, for all the purposes of this Act, the assessee in respect of such income-tax \n Provided that where the person entitle to the income, profits or gains is not resident in the taxable territories, the income-tax so chargeable nay be recovered by deduction under any of the provisions of Section 18 and that any arrears of tax may be recovered also in accordance with the provision of this Act from any assets of the non- resident person which are, or may at any time come within the taxable territories \n Provided further that any such agent, or any person who apprehends that he may be assessed as such an agent, may retain out of any money payable by him to such non-resident person a sum equal to his estimated liability under this sub-section, and in the event of any disagreement between the non-resident person and such agent or person as to the amount to be so retained, such agent or person may secure from the Income-tax Officer a certificate stating the amount to be so retained pending final settlement of the certificate so obtained shall be his warrant for retaining that amount \n Provided further that the amount recoverable from such agent or person at the time of final settlement shall not exceed the amount specified in such certificate except to the extent to which such agent or person may at such time have in his hands additional assets of such non- resident person.\nWhere a person not resident or not ordinarily resident in the taxable territories carries on business with a person resident in the taxable territories, and it appears to the Income-tax Officer, that owing to the close connection between such persons the course of business is so arranged that the business done by the resident person with the person not resident or not ordinarily resident produces to the resident either no profits or less than the ordinary profits which might be expected to arise in that business, the profits derived therefrom or which may reasonably be deemed to have been derived therefrom, shall be chargeable to income-tax in the purposes of this Act, the assessee in respect of such income-tax.\nIn the case of a business of which all the operations are not carried out in the taxable territories the profits and gains of the business deemed under this section to accrue or arise in the taxable territories shall be only such profits and gains as are reasonably attributable to that part of the operations carried out in the taxable territories.\nBy the amendment in the year 1939, the total income of any previous year of any person was defined as including all income, profits and gains from whatever source derived which \n (a) are received or are deemed to be received in British India in such year by or on behalf of such person, or\n (b) if such person is resident in British India during such year, - \n accrue or arise or are deemed to accrue or arise to him in British India during such year or\n accrue or arise to him without British India during such year or \n (c) if such person in sot resident in British India during such year, accrue or arise or are deemed to accrue or arise to him in British India during such year \n This legislative change in the Act made all income accruing or arising or deemed to accrue or arise in British India during the previous year to a resident the subject to charge, apart from income accruing or arising without British India during the previous year.\nBy statutory fiction income which can in no sense be said to accrue at all may be considered as so accruing. Similarly, the fiction may relate to the place, the person or be in respect of the year of taxability. Section 42(1) defines what income is deemed to accrue within the taxable territories. It is only by application of this definition that one class of income deemed to accrue to a resident within the taxable territories within the meaning of Section 4(1)(b)(i) can be estimated.\nThe relevant part of Section 14 after this amendment is in these terms - The tax shall not be payable by an assessee in respect of any income, profits or gains accruing or arising to him within a Part B State, unless such income, profits or gains are received or deemed to be received in or are brought into the taxable territories in the previous year by or on behalf of the assessee, or are assessable under Section 12-B or Section 42.\nSub- section (2) and the latter portion of sub-section (1) expressly concern themselves with the case of non-residents, while sub-section (1) and (3) are so framed that they cover both residents and non- residents.\nA Bench to the Bombay High Court in Commissioner of Income-tax v. Western India Life Insurance Co., held that notwithstanding its amendment in 1939 the section applied only to non-residents.\nIn Sutlej Cotton Mills Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-tax, West Bengal, a Bench of the Calcutta High Court considered this matter at some length and reached the decision the sub-sections (1) and (3) of Section 42 covered cases of both residents as well as non-residents. The same view was taken by a Bench of the Madras v. P arasuram Jethanand. Again the matter was discussed in this court in Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay v.\nAhmedbhai Umarbhai Co\nIt is noteworthy that the first part of sub-section (1) of Section 42 providing that certain classes of income are to be deemed to accrue or arise in British India is not confined in its application to non- residents, but is in general terms so as to be applicable to both residents and non-residents.\nBefore its amendment in 1939 the sub- section began with the words in the case of any person residing out of British India which obviously restricted the application of the provision to non-resident persons, but in its amended form the sub- section has been recast into two distinct parts, the first of which is not so restricted, and the second part alone, which begins with the words and where the person entitled to the income, profits and gains is not resident in British India, is made applicable to non-resident persons, thereby showing that the former part applies to both residents and non-residents. The opening words of the first proviso also point to the same conclusion, for these words would be supplusage it the sub-section as a whole applied only to non-residents.\nAs pointed out by the Privy Council in Balraj Kunwar v. Jagatpal Singh, marginal notes in an Indian statute, as in an Act of Parliament, cannot be referred to for the purpose of construing the statute, and it may be mentioned in this connection that the marginal note relied on has since been replaced by the words Income deemed to accrue or arise within British India which makes it clear that the main object of sub-section (I) was to define that expression see Section 12(a) of Act XXII of 1947.\nNor can the title of a chapter be legitimately used to restrict the plain terms of an enactment.\nMr. Kolah argued that when the world income of a resident was brought within the net of chargeability by Section 4 in 1939 it was then wholly unnecessary to include such an assessee in the ambit of Section 42. In our judgment, this contention is fallacious.\nWhatever income arises in a primary sense to a resident in the taxable territories is chargeable under Section 4(1)(b)(i). Hence it was necessary to make Section 42 applicable to such a case. Whatever other consideration may arise in estimating the foreign income of a resident will not be applicable to income deemed to accrue within the taxable territory. Moreover, as above pointed out, in view of the provisions of Section 14(2)(c), resident assessees, but for Section 42(1), would not be liable to assessment regarding income accruing to them in Part B States, even if there is a business connection in the taxable territory.\nThe only purpose in deleting these words could be to bring residents within the ambit of the section. There is no reason whatsoever for not giving to the palin words of the section the meaning that on the face of it they bear. For the reasons given above we are of the opinion that the answer re turned by the High Court of Bombay to the first question referred to it was wrong.", + "expert_5": "Section 42 of the Act is in these terms - \n All income, profits or gains accruing or arising, whether directly or indirectly, through or from any business connection in the taxable territories, or through or from any property in the taxable territories, or through or from any asset or source of income in the taxable territories, or through or from any money lent at interest and brought into the taxable territories in cash or in kind or through or from the sale, exchange or transfer of a capital asset in the taxable territories, shall be deemed to be income accruing or arising within the taxable territories, and were the person entitled to the income, profits or gains is not resident in the taxable territories, shall be chargeable to income-tax either in his name or in the name of his agent\nBefore its amendment in the year 1939 the first part of the section ran thus - 42. (1) In the case of any person residing out of British India, all profits or gains accruing or arising to such person, whether directly or indirectly, through or from any business connection or property in British India, shall be deemed to be income accruing or arising within British India, and shall be chargeable to income-tax in the name of the agent of any such person, and such agent shall be deemed to be, for all the purposes of this Act, the assessee in respect of such income- tax .\nIn order to clarify this matter, by Act XXII of 1947 the magical note was amended and it now is in these terms - Income deemed to accrue or arise within British India.\nSection 4 as it stood prior to 1939 charged income-tax on all income, profits or gains, from whatever source derived, accruing or arising, or received in British India or deemed under the provisions of the Act to accrue, or arise, or to be received in British India.\nIt further provided that the income, profits and gains accruing or arising without British India to a person resident in British India shall, if they are received in or brought into British India, be deemed to have accrued or arisen in British India and to be income, profits and gains of the year in which they are so received or brought, notwithstanding the fact that they did not so accrued or arise in that year.\nBy the amendment in the year 1939, the total income of any previous year of any person was defined as including all income, profits and gains from whatever source derived which \n (a) are received or are deemed to be received in British India in such year by or on behalf of such person, or\n (b) if such person is resident in British India during such year, - \n accrue or arise or are deemed to accrue or arise to him in British India during such year or\n accrue or arise to him without British India during such year or \n (c) if such person in sot resident in British India during such year, accrue or arise or are deemed to accrue or arise to him in British India during such year\nThe words In the case of any person residing out of British India were deleted from Section 42(1) during the tendency of the amendment bill of 1939 in the Council of State presumably with the object of making the section application to any person who had any income which in a primary sense arose in British India, even though technically it had arisen abroad, irrespective of the circumstance whether that person was resident, ordinarily resident or not ordinarily resident.\nThe tax shall not be payable by an assessee in respect of any income, profits or gains accruing or arising to him within a Part B State, unless such income, profits or gains are received or deemed to be received in or are brought into the taxable territories in the previous year by or on behalf of the assessee, or are assessable under Section 12-B or Section 42.\nIn view of these legislative changes in the provisions of Section 4, 14 and 42 of the Act, the conclusion is irresistible that the object or recasting Section 42(1) in general terms was to make the definition of deemed income given in the section generally applicable to all classes of assessees. This sub-section has been drafted in the widest terms and there is nothing whatsoever in its language to suggest that its operation is confined to non-residents only.\nWherever the legislature intended to limit the operation of any part of this section to non-residents alone, it said so in express terms.\nIt seems to us that any other construction of the section would create an anomaly, inasmuch as the Part B State income falling under Section 42 would not be assessable in the hands of a resident, but it would be assessable in the hands of a non-resident, because the Income-tax Act, while it ropes in world income of a resident exempts income accruing within the Part B States from its ambit, except when such income is received or is brought into taxable territory or comes within the ambit of Section 42. \nSuch a construction would be contrary to the policy of the Act.\nIn Sutlej Cotton Mills Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-tax, West Bengal, a Bench of the Calcutta High Court considered this matter at some length and reached the decision the sub-sections (1) and (3) of Section 42 covered cases of both residents as well as non-residents.\nThe same view was taken by a Bench of the Madras v. P arasuram Jethanand.\nAgain the matter was discussed in this court in Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay v. Ahmedbhai Umarbhai Co., by Patanjali Sastri, J., as he then was, and also by Mukherjea, J., in the same case.\nbut is in general terms so as to be applicable to both residents and non-residents.\nBefore its amendment in 1939 the sub- section began with the words in the case of any person residing out of British India which obviously restricted the application of the provision to non-resident persons, but in its amended form the sub- section has been recast into two distinct parts, the first of which is not so restricted, and the second part alone, which begins with the words and where the person entitled to the income, profits and gains is not resident in British India, is made applicable to non-resident persons, thereby showing that the former part applies to both residents and non-residents.\nThe opening words of the first proviso also point to the same conclusion, for these words would be supplusage it the sub-section as a whole applied only to non-residents.\nThe only purpose in deleting these words could be to bring residents within the ambit of the section. There is no reason whatsoever for not giving to the palin words of the section the meaning that on the face of it they bear.\nFor the reasons given above we are of the opinion that the answer re turned by the High Court of Bombay to the first question referred to it was wrong." + }, + "1954_0": { + "expert_1": "This is an appeal by special leave against the order made on the 20th November, 1951, by the Judicial Commissioner of Himachal Pradesh in proceedings instituted by the respondents under articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. There is no substantial dispute as to the facts leading up to the present appeal. The appellants were tenants of a certain shop premises situate in Solan Bazar in the district of Mahasu in Himachal Pradesh. On the llth October, 1947, they had executed a rent deed by which they agreed to pay an annual rent of Rs. 175 payable as to Rs. 50 on the last of Baisakh and as to the balance of Rs. 125 in the month of October, in default of which payment, the respondents, as landlords, would be entitled to recover the whole of the said rent in one lump sum. \nThe tenancy created by the rent deed was only for one year in the first instance but it provided that if the tenants desired to continue in occupation they must execute a further rent deed before the expiration of the said term. The appellants never executed any further rent deed but held over and continued in occupation of the demised premises. The appellants fell into arrears with the payments of rents due for the years 1948 and 1949 and the respondents made applications to the Rent Controller for eviction of the appellants under section 13 (2) (i) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, as extended to Himachal Pradesh. The appellants, however, paid up the arrears of rent into court and claimed the benefit of the proviso to section 13 (2) (i). The claim was allowed and the said applications were dismissed accordingly on the 18th December, 1950. The appellants again fell into arrears with the pay- ment of rent due for the year 1950. On the 26th December, 1950, the respondents served on the appellants a notice c alling upon the latter to pay whole of the said rent forthwith but the appellants failed to do so. The respondents thereupon, on the 2nd January, 1951, filed an application under section 13 (2) (i) for the eviction of the appellants on the ground of nonpayment of rent. Thereafter, on the 10th January, 1951, the appellants made an application to the Rent Controller for the fixation of a fair rent under section 4 of the said Act. On the 25th January, 1951, the appellants filed their written statements in the proceedings under section 13 (2) (i) admitting the nonpayment of rent and the receipt of the notice but pleaded (i) that the respondents application was barred by reason of the rejection of the previous applications for eviction made by the respondents and (ii) that the present application could not be entertained in view of the pendency of their application for fixation of a fair rent under section 4 of the said Act. On the 20th February, 1951, the Rent Controller framed the following issues- \n Whether the application in question was not entertainable in view of the judgment of the District Judge, dated the 18th December, 1950 Onus on defendants. If issue No. I is not proved, had the opposite party (tenants) not paid the rent and as such were they liable to be ejected? Onus on plaintiffs. Have the opposite party already filed an application in the said court for the fixation of rent and are they, therefore, not liable for ejectment pending the decision on the application and what is its effect on the said application? Onus on defendants.\nBy his judgment, dated the 29th May, 1951, the Rent Controller held that as the previous applications related to non-payment of rents for the years 1948 and 1949 the present application which was founded on non-payment of rent for 1950 was not barred under section 14 of the said Act but, although the fact of rent being in arrears was admitted, the Rent Controller did not think fit to make an order directing the appellants to put the respondents in possession of the demised premises. The reasons given by him were as follows- Regarding the non-payment of the rent when the plea of the tenant is only that he is waiting for the fixation of fair rent by the Rent Controller there is not enough ground for ejectment. A civil suit for the recovery of the rent would have been a more appropriate method of obtaining that rent. \n I therefore dismiss the suit. The parties should bear their own The respondents preferred an appeal to the District Judge of Mahasu under section 15 of the said Act.\nThe learned District Judge dismissed the appeal observing- On behalf of the landlord it was urged that under section 13 (2) of the Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, as applied to Himachal Pradesh, the Controller, if it came to the finding that rent had not been paid, had no option but to direct the tenant to put the landlord in possession. Undoubtedly, that is the correct legal position, but in the present case the non-payment of rent was due to a misapprehension of the legal position created by the tenant filing an application for fixing fair rent. 1, therefore, think that this case can be distinguished and does not fall within section 13 (2), Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act. The respondents moved the Judicial Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh, under articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order of the District Judge.\nThe learned Judicial Commissioner held that in view of the admitted failure to pay the rent as provided by the rent deed or at the first hearing of the court under the proviso to section 13 (2) (i) the courts below had acted arbitrarily in refusing to make an order for ejectment against the tenants who had not done what was incumbent on them to do under the law and that such a situation called for inter- ference by the court of the Judicial Commissioner in order to keep the subordinate courts within the bounds of their authority. \n He accordingly set aside the orders of the courts below and allowed the application for ejectment but gave the appelants three months time for vacating the premises.\nLearned advocate appearing in support of this appeal urges that the learned Judicial Commissioner acted wholly without jurisdiction inasmuch as (1) the Rent Controller or the District Judge exercising powers under the Act was not amenable to the jurisdiction of the High Court and, therefore, article 227 confers no power on the court of the Judicial Commissioner over the Rent Controller or the District Judge, and (2) that article 227 read with article 241 confers no power of judicial superintendence on the court of the Judicial Commissioner.\nRe. l.-The court of the Judicial Commissioner of Himachal Pradesh exercises jurisdiction in relation to the whole of the territories of Himachal Pradesh. The Rent Controller and the District Judge exercising jurisdiction under the Act are certainly tribunals, if not courts, and they function within the territories of Himachal Pradesh. \n Therefore, article 297 (1) read with article 241 confers on the court of the Judicial Commissioner power of superintendence over such tribunals. The words in relation to which obviously qualify the word territories and not the words courts and tribunals.\nThe material part of article 227 substantially reproduces the provisions of section 107 of the Government of India Act, 1915, except that the power of superintendence has been extended by the article also to tribunals. That the Rent Controller and the District Judge exercising jurisdiction under the Act are tribunals cannot and has not been controverted. The only question raised is as to the nature of the power of superintendence conferred by the article. Reference is made to clause (2) of the article in support of the contention that this article only confers on the High Court administrative superintendence over the subordinate courts and tribunals. We are unable to accept this contention because clause ( 2) is, expressed to be without prejudice to the.generality of the provisions in clause (1).\nFurther, the preponderance of judicial opinion in India was that section 107 which was similar in terms to section 15 of the High Courts Act, 1861, gave a power of judicial superintendence to the High Court apart from and independently of the provisions of other laws conferring revisional jurisdiction on the High Court.\nIn this connection it has to be remembered that section 107 of the Government of India Act, 1915, was reproduced in the Government of India Act, 1935, as section 224. Section 224 of the 1935 Act, however, introduced sub-section (2), which was new, providing that nothing in the section should be construed as giving the High Court any jurisdiction to,question any judgment of any inferior court which was not otherwise subject to appeal or revision. The idea presumably was to nullify the effect of the decisions of the different High Courts referred to above. Section 224 of the 1935 Act has been reproduced with certain modifications in article 227 of the Constitution. It is significant to note that sub-section (2) to section 224, of the 1935 Act has been omitted from article 227. This significant omission has been regarded by all High Courts in India before whom this question has arisen As having restored to the High Court the power of judicial superintendence it had under section 15 of the High Courts Act, 186 1, and section 107 of the Government of India Act, 1915. See the cases referred to in -Moti Lal v. The State through Shrimati Sagrawati(1). Our attention has not been drawn to any case which has taken a different view and, as at present advised, we see no reason to take a different view.\nThis power of superintendence conferred by article 227 is, as pointed out by Harries C. J., in Dalmia Jain Airways Ltd. \n Sukumar Mukherjee(2), to be exercised most sparingly and only in appropriate cases in order to keep the Subordinate Courts within the bounds of their authority and not for correcting mere errors.", + "expert_2": "Learned advocate appearing in support of this appeal urges that the learned Judicial Commissioner acted wholly without jurisdiction inasmuch as (1) the Rent Controller or the District Judge exercising powers under the Act was not amenable to the jurisdiction of the High Court and, therefore, article 227 confers no power on the court of the Judicial Commissioner over the Rent Controller or the District Judge, and (2) that article 227 read with article 241 confers no power of judicial superintendence on the court of the Judicial Commissioner.\nThe only question raised is as to the nature of the power of superintendence conferred by the article. Reference is made to clause (2) of the article in support of the contention that this article only confers on the High Court administrative superintendence over the subordinate courts and tribunals.\nSection 224 of the 1935 Act, however, introduced sub-section (2), which was new, providing that nothing in the section should be construed as giving the High Court any jurisdiction to,question any judgment of any inferior court which was not otherwise subject to appeal or revision.\nIt is significant to note that sub-section (2) to section 224, of the 1935 Act has been omitted from article 227. This significant omission has been regarded by all High Courts in India before whom this question has arisen As having restored to the High Court the power of judicial superintendence it had under section 15 of the High Courts Act, 186 1, and section 107 of the Government of India Act, 1915.\nThis power of superintendence conferred by article 227 is, as pointed out by Harries C. J., in Dalmia Jain Airways Ltd. \n Sukumar Mukherjee(2), to be exercised most sparingly and only in appropriate cases in order to keep the Subordinate Courts within the bounds of their authority and not for correcting mere errors.", + "expert_3": "This is an appeal by special leave against the order made on the 20th November, 1951, by the Judicial Commissioner of Himachal Pradesh in proceedings instituted by the respondents under articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India\nThe appellants were tenants of a certain shop premises situate in Solan Bazar in the district of Mahasu in Himachal Pradesh\nOn the llth October, 1947, they had executed a rent deed by which they agreed to pay an annual rent of Rs. 175 payable as to Rs. 50 on the last of Baisakh and as to the balance of Rs. 125 in the month of October, in default of which payment, the respondents, as landlords, would be entitled to recover the whole of the said rent in one lump sum. \nThe tenancy created by the rent deed was only for one year in the first instance but it provided that if the tenants desired to continue in occupation they must execute a further rent deed before the expiration of the said term. The appellants never executed any further rent deed but held over and continued in occupation of the demised premises.\nThe appellants fell into arrears with the payments of rents due for the years 1948 and 1949 and the respondents made applications to the Rent Controller for eviction of the appellants under section 13 (2) (i) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, as extended to Himachal Pradesh. The appellants, however, paid up the arrears of rent into court and claimed the benefit of the proviso to section 13 (2) (i)\nThe claim was allowed and the said applications were dismissed accordingly on the 18th December, 1950. The appellants again fell into arrears with the pay- ment of rent due for the year 1950. On the 26th December, 1950, the respondents served on the appellants a notice c alling upon the latter to pay whole of the said rent forthwith but the appellants failed to do so\nThe respondents thereupon, on the 2nd January, 1951, filed an application under section 13 (2) (i) for the eviction of the appellants on the ground of nonpayment of rent. Thereafter, on the 10th January, 1951, the appellants made an application to the Rent Controller for the fixation of a fair rent under section 4 of the said Act\nOn the 20th February, 1951, the Rent Controller framed the following issues- \n Whether the application in question was not entertainable in view of the judgment of the District Judge, dated the 18th December, 1950\nIf issue No. I is not proved, had the opposite party (tenants) not paid the rent and as such were they liable to be ejected? Onus on plaintiffs.\nHave the opposite party already filed an application in the said court for the fixation of rent and are they, therefore, not liable for ejectment pending the decision on the application and what is its effect on the said application? Onus on defendants\nBy his judgment, dated the 29th May, 1951, the Rent Controller held that as the previous applications related to non-payment of rents for the years 1948 and 1949 the present application which was founded on non-payment of rent for 1950 was not barred under section 14 of the said Act but, although the fact of rent being in arrears was admitted, the Rent Controller did not think fit to make an order directing the appellants to put the respondents in possession of the demised premises.\nThe respondents preferred an appeal to the District Judge of Mahasu under section 15 of the said Act.\nThe learned District Judge dismissed the appeal observing- On behalf of the landlord it was urged that under section 13 (2) of the Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, as applied to Himachal Pradesh, the Controller, if it came to the finding that rent had not been paid, had no option but to direct the tenant to put the landlord in possession. Undoubtedly, that is the correct legal position, but in the present case the non-payment of rent was due to a misapprehension of the legal position created by the tenant filing an application for fixing fair rent. 1, therefore, think that this case can be distinguished and does not fall within section 13 (2), Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act\nThe respondents moved the Judicial Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh, under articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order of the District Judge\nThe learned Judicial Commissioner held that in view of the admitted failure to pay the rent as provided by the rent deed or at the first hearing of the court under the proviso to section 13 (2) (i) the courts below had acted arbitrarily in refusing to make an order for ejectment against the tenants who had not done what was incumbent on them to do under the law and that such a situation called for inter- ference by the court of the Judicial Commissioner in order to keep the subordinate courts within the bounds of their authority. \n He accordingly set aside the orders of the courts below and allowed the application for ejectment but gave the appelants three months time for vacating the premises\nThe appellants have now come up before this court on appeal by special leave obtained from this court\nThe court of the Judicial Commissioner of Himachal Pradesh exercises jurisdiction in relation to the whole of the territories of Himachal Pradesh. The Rent Controller and the District Judge exercising jurisdiction under the Act are certainly tribunals, if not courts, and they function within the territories of Himachal Pradesh\nTherefore, article 297 (1) read with article 241 confers on the court of the Judicial Commissioner power of superintendence over such tribunals. The words in relation to which obviously qualify the word territories and not the words courts and tribunals\nThe material part of article 227 substantially reproduces the provisions of section 107 of the Government of India Act, 1915, except that the power of superintendence has been extended by the article also to tribunals. That the Rent Controller and the District Judge exercising jurisdiction under the Act are tribunals cannot and has not been controverted.\nThe only question raised is as to the nature of the power of superintendence conferred by the article.\nclause ( 2) is, expressed to be without prejudice to the.generality of the provisions in clause (1). Further, the preponderance of judicial opinion in India was that section 107 which was similar in terms to section 15 of the High Courts Act, 1861, gave a power of judicial superintendence to the High Court apart from and independently of the provisions of other laws conferring revisional jurisdiction on the High Court.\nIn this connection it has to be remembered that section 107 of the Government of India Act, 1915, was reproduced in the Government of India Act, 1935, as section 224\nSection 224 of the 1935 Act, however, introduced sub-section (2), which was new, providing that nothing in the section should be construed as giving the High Court any jurisdiction to,question any judgment of any inferior court which was not otherwise subject to appeal or revision. The idea presumably was to nullify the effect of the decisions of the different High Courts referred to above\nSection 224 of the 1935 Act has been reproduced with certain modifications in article 227 of the Constitution. It is significant to note that sub-section (2) to section 224, of the 1935 Act has been omitted from article 227. This significant omission has been regarded by all High Courts in India before whom this question has arisen As having restored to the High Court the power of judicial superintendence it had under section 15 of the High Courts Act, 186 1, and section 107 of the Government of India Act, 1915.\nThis power of superintendence conferred by article 227 is, as pointed out by Harries C. J., in Dalmia Jain Airways Ltd. \n Sukumar Mukherjee(2), to be exercised most sparingly and only in appropriate cases in order to keep the Subordinate Courts within the bounds of their authority and not for correcting mere errors.", + "expert_4": "-This is an appeal by special leave against the order made on the 20th November, 1951, by the Judicial Commissioner of Himachal Pradesh in proceedings instituted by the respondents under articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. There is no substantial dispute as to the facts leading up to the present appeal.\nThe appellants were tenants of a certain shop premises situate in Solan Bazar in the district of Mahasu in Himachal Pradesh. On the llth October, 1947, they had executed a rent deed by which they agreed to pay an annual rent of Rs. 175 payable as to Rs. 50 on the last of Baisakh and as to the balance of Rs. 125 in the month of October, in default of which payment, the respondents, as landlords, would be entitled to recover the whole of the said rent in one lump sum. \nThe tenancy created by the rent deed was only for one year in the first instance but it provided that if the tenants desired to continue in occupation they must execute a further rent deed before the expiration of the said term.\nThe appellants never executed any further rent deed but held over and continued in occupation of the demised premises. The appellants fell into arrears with the payments of rents due for the years 1948 and 1949 and the respondents made applications to the Rent Controller for eviction of the appellants under section 13 (2) (i) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, as extended to Himachal Pradesh. The appellants, however, paid up the arrears of rent into court and claimed the benefit of the proviso to section 13 (2) (i). The claim was allowed and the said applications were dismissed accordingly on the 18th December, 1950. The appellants again fell into arrears with the pay- ment of rent due for the year 1950. On the 26th December, 1950, the respondents served on the appellants a notice c alling upon the latter to pay whole of the said rent forthwith but the appellants failed to do so.\nOn the 25th January, 1951, the appellants filed their written statements in the proceedings under section 13 (2) (i) admitting the nonpayment of rent and the receipt of the notice but pleaded (i) that the respondents application was barred by reason of the rejection of the previous applications for eviction made by the respondents and (ii) that the present application could not be entertained in view of the pendency of their application for fixation of a fair rent under section 4 of the said Act.\nOn the 20th February, 1951, the Rent Controller framed the following issues- \n Whether the application in question was not entertainable in view of the judgment of the District Judge, dated the 18th December, 1950 Onus on defendants. If issue No.\nOn the 20th February, 1951, the Rent Controller framed the following issues- \n Whether the application in question was not entertainable in view of the judgment of the District Judge, dated the 18th December, 1950 Onus on defendants. If issue No. I is not proved, had the opposite party (tenants) not paid the rent and as such were they liable to be ejected? Onus on plaintiffs.\nHave the opposite party already filed an application in the said court for the fixation of rent and are they, therefore, not liable for ejectment pending the decision on the application and what is its effect on the said application? Onus on defendants.\nBy his judgment, dated the 29th May, 1951, the Rent Controller held that as the previous applications related to non-payment of rents for the years 1948 and 1949 the present application which was founded on non-payment of rent for 1950 was not barred under section 14 of the said Act but, although the fact of rent being in arrears was admitted, the Rent Controller did not think fit to make an order directing the appellants to put the respondents in possession of the demised premises.\nThe reasons given by him were as follows- Regarding the non-payment of the rent when the plea of the tenant is only that he is waiting for the fixation of fair rent by the Rent Controller there is not enough ground for ejectment. A civil suit for the recovery of the rent would have been a more appropriate method of obtaining that rent.\nI therefore dismiss the suit.\nThe parties should bear their own The respondents preferred an appeal to the District Judge of Mahasu under section 15 of the said Act. The learned District Judge dismissed the appeal observing- On behalf of the landlord it was urged that under section 13 (2) of the Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, as applied to Himachal Pradesh, the Controller, if it came to the finding that rent had not been paid, had no option but to direct the tenant to put the landlord in possession.\nUndoubtedly, that is the correct legal position, but in the present case the non-payment of rent was due to a misapprehension of the legal position created by the tenant filing an application for fixing fair rent. 1, therefore, think that this case can be distinguished and does not fall within section 13 (2), Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act.\nThe respondents moved the Judicial Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh, under articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order of the District Judge.\nThe learned Judicial Commissioner held that in view of the admitted failure to pay the rent as provided by the rent deed or at the first hearing of the court under the proviso to section 13 (2) (i) the courts below had acted arbitrarily in refusing to make an order for ejectment against the tenants who had not done what was incumbent on them to do under the law and that such a situation called for inter- ference by the court of the Judicial Commissioner in order to keep the subordinate courts within the bounds of their authority. \n He accordingly set aside the orders of the courts below and allowed the application for ejectment but gave the appelants three months time for vacating the premises.\nThe Rent Controller and the District Judge exercising jurisdiction under the Act are certainly tribunals, if not courts, and they function within the territories of Himachal Pradesh. \n Therefore, article 297 (1) read with article 241 confers on the court of the Judicial Commissioner power of superintendence over such tribunals. The words in relation to which obviously qualify the word territories and not the words courts and tribunals. Re. 2.The material part of article 227 substantially reproduces the provisions of section 107 of the Government of India Act, 1915, except that the power of superintendence has been extended by the article also to tribunals. That the Rent Controller and the District Judge exercising jurisdiction under the Act are tribunals cannot and has not been controverted.\nThe only question raised is as to the nature of the power of superintendence conferred by the article.\nReference is made to clause (2) of the article in support of the contention that this article only confers on the High Court administrative superintendence over the subordinate courts and tribunals.\nWe are unable to accept this contention because clause ( 2) is, expressed to be without prejudice to the.generality of the provisions in clause (1). Further, the preponderance of judicial opinion in India was that section 107 which was similar in terms to section 15 of the High Courts Act, 1861, gave a power of judicial superintendence to the High Court apart from and independently of the provisions of other laws conferring revisional jurisdiction on the High Court.\nIn this connection it has to be remembered that section 107 of the Government of India Act, 1915, was reproduced in the Government of India Act, 1935, as section 224.\nSection 224 of the 1935 Act, however, introduced sub-section (2), which was new, providing that nothing in the section should be construed as giving the High Court any jurisdiction to,question any judgment of any inferior court which was not otherwise subject to appeal or revision. The idea presumably was to nullify the effect of the decisions of the different High Courts referred to above.\nSection 224 of the 1935 Act has been reproduced with certain modifications in article 227 of the Constitution.\nIt is significant to note that sub-section (2) to section 224, of the 1935 Act has been omitted from article 227. This significant omission has been regarded by all High Courts in India before whom this question has arisen As having restored to the High Court the power of judicial superintendence it had under section 15 of the High Courts Act, 186 1, and section 107 of the Government of India Act, 1915.\nSee the cases referred to in -Moti Lal v.\nThe State through Shrimati Sagrawati(1).\nOur attention has not been drawn to any case which has taken a different view and, as at present advised, we see no reason to take a different view. This power of superintendence conferred by article 227 is, as pointed out by Harries C.\nJ., in Dalmia Jain Airways Ltd.\nSukumar Mukherjee(2), to be exercised most sparingly and only in appropriate cases in order to keep the Subordinate Courts within the bounds of their authority and not for correcting mere errors.", + "expert_5": "There is no substantial dispute as to the facts leading up to the present appeal.\nthe appellants filed their written statements in the proceedings under section 13 (2) (i) admitting the nonpayment of rent and the receipt of the notice\nThe court of the Judicial Commissioner of Himachal Pradesh exercises jurisdiction in relation to the whole of the territories of Himachal Pradesh. The Rent Controller and the District Judge exercising jurisdiction under the Act are certainly tribunals, if not courts, and they function within the territories of Himachal Pradesh.\nThe words in relation to which obviously qualify the word territories and not the words courts and tribunals.\nThe material part of article 227 substantially reproduces the provisions of section 107 of the Government of India Act, 1915, except that the power of superintendence has been extended by the article also to tribunals.\nThat the Rent Controller and the District Judge exercising jurisdiction under the Act are tribunals cannot and has not been controverted.\nclause ( 2) is, expressed to be without prejudice to the.generality of the provisions in clause (1).\nthe preponderance of judicial opinion in India was that section 107 which was similar in terms to section 15 of the High Courts Act, 1861, gave a power of judicial superintendence to the High Court apart from and independently of the provisions of other laws conferring revisional jurisdiction on the High Court.\nIn this connection it has to be remembered that section 107 of the Government of India Act, 1915, was reproduced in the Government of India Act, 1935, as section 224. Section 224 of the 1935 Act, however, introduced sub-section (2), which was new, providing that nothing in the section should be construed as giving the High Court any jurisdiction to,question any judgment of any inferior court which was not otherwise subject to appeal or revision. The idea presumably was to nullify the effect of the decisions of the different High Courts referred to above. Section 224 of the 1935 Act has been reproduced with certain modifications in article 227 of the Constitution. It is significant to note that sub-section (2) to section 224, of the 1935 Act has been omitted from article 227. This significant omission has been regarded by all High Courts in India before whom this question has arisen As having restored to the High Court the power of judicial superintendence it had under section 15 of the High Courts Act, 186 1, and section 107 of the Government of India Act, 1915.\nMoti Lal v. The State through Shrimati Sagrawati(1)." + }, + "1954_114": { + "expert_1": "This is an application for review of the judgment of this Court in Civil Appeal No. 52 of 1954. That was an appeal against an order of the Election Tribunal, Himachal Pradesh (Simla), dismissing a petition to set aside the election of the respondent to the Legislative Assembly, Himachal Pradesh, from the Rohru Constituency. \nTwo points were raised at the hearing of the appeal before us One was that the respondent was disqualified for election to the Assembly under section 17 of Act No. XLIX of 1951, read with section 7(d) of Act No. XLIII of 195 1, by reason of the fact that he was interested in contracts for the supply of Ayurvedic Medicines to the Himachal Pradesh Government, and the other, that he had appointed Government servants as polling agents, and had thereby contravened section 123(8) of Act No. XLIII of 1951.\nOn the first question, we held that, on a true construction of section 17, what would be a disqualification for election to either House of Parliament under article 102 would, under that section, be disqualification for election to the Legislatures of Part C States, and that the disqualification under section 7 (d) of Act No. XLIII of 1951 would accordingly be a disqualification under section 17 of Act No. XLIX of 195 1.\nWe, however, disagreed with this con- tention, and held that article 239 had not the effect of merging States with the Central Government, and converting contracts with the States into those with the Central Government.\nWe are unable to agree that section 3(8) has the effect of putting an end to the status of Part C -States as independent units, distinct from the Union Government under the Constitution. It merely recognies that those States are centrally administered through the President under article 239, and enacts that the expression Central Government should include the Chief Commissioner administering a Part C State under the authority given to him under article 239.\nWhatever the anomaly, in our view, the proper course is to give effect to the plain language of the statute. We must accordingly hold that in view of section 3(8) of the General Clauses Act, a contract with the Chief Commissioner in a Part C State is a contract with the Central Government, and that would be a disqualification for election to the Legislative Assembly under section 17 of Act No. XLIX of 1951 read with section 7(8) of Act No. XLIII of 1951. This conclusion, however, can result in no advantage to the petitioner, as the further finding of the Election Tribunal is that no contracts of the respondent with the Himachal Pradesh Government were proved to have been subsisting at the material period. \nThat finding is, for the reasons already given, not open to attack in this appeal, and is sufficient answer to the objection that the respondent was disqualified under section 17.\nThe second point that was argued before us in appeal was that the respondent had appointed certain Government servants to act as polling agents, and had thereby committed a major corrupt practice under section 123(8) of Act No. XLIII of 1951.\nIn rejecting this contention we observed that, as an abstract proposition of law, the mere appointment of a Government servant as a polling agent in itself and without more is not an infringement of section 123(8).\nThese are duties which are cast on the presiding officer and the polling officers as well, and as these are matters to be attended to before any recording or votes begins, it is difficult to see how they -can be said to assist in the furtherance of the election prospects\nof any one candidate more than of any other. The second\nstage is when the polling is actually in progress. The duty of the polling agent at this stage is to identify the voters.\nIndeed, the work of the polling agent both in the first stage and in the last stage is similar in character, and neither can be said to contravene section 123(8). \nAs regards the second stage, as already stated in our judgment, the duty of polling agent is merely to identify a voter, and that could not by itself and without more be said to further the election prospects of the candidate.\nIn this connection, it must be noted that while section 41 of Act No. XLIII of 1951 contains a prohibition against the appointment of certain persons as election agents, there is none such with, reference to the appointment of polling agents under section 46 of the Act. To hold that Government servants are, as such and as a class, disqualified to act as polling agents would be to engraft an exception to the statute, which is not there.\nAccordingly, we reaffirm the view taken by us that the appointment of a Government servant as polling agent does not, without more, contravene section 123(8).\nIt is scarcely necessary to repeat our observation in the original judgment that if it is made out that the candidate or his agent had abused the right to appoint a Government servant as polling agent by exploiting the situation for furthering his election prospects, then the matter can be dealt with as an infringement of section 123(8).", + "expert_2": "That was an appeal against an order of the Election Tribunal, Himachal Pradesh (Simla), dismissing a petition to set aside the election of the respondent to the Legislative Assembly, Himachal Pradesh, from the Rohru Constituency.\nwe held that, on a true construction of section 17, what would be a disqualification for election to either House of Parliament under article 102 would, under that section, be disqualification for election to the Legislatures of Part C States, and that the disqualification under section 7 (d) of Act No. XLIII of 1951 would accordingly be a disqualification under section 17 of Act No. XLIX of 195 1.\ndefinition of Central Government in section 3(8)(b)(ii) of the General Clauses Act. It is as follows Central Governmnet shall in relation to anything done or to be done after the commencement of the Constitution, mean the President and shall include in relation to the administration of a Part C State, the Chief Commissioner or Lieutenant-Governor or Government of a neighbouring State or other authority acting within the scope of the authority given to him or it under article 239 or article 243 of the Constitution, as the case may be. He argues that by force of this definition, contracts with the Chief Commissioner of Himachal Pradesh must be treated as contracts with the Central Government, and that in consequence, the respondent was disqualified for election under section 17 of Act No. XLIX of 1951, read along with section 7(d) of Act No. XLIII of 1951.\nHis contention is that there being in the Constitution a fundamental distinction between the Government of the Union and Government of the States, section 3(8) of the General Clauses Act should be so construed as not to destroy that distinction, and that having regard to the definition of State in section 3(60), it must be held that to the extent the Central Government administers Part C States under article 239, its character is that of the State Governments.\nWe are unable to agree that section 3(8) has the effect of putting an end to the status of Part C -States as independent units, distinct from the Union Government under the Constitution. It merely recognies that those States are centrally administered through the President under article 239, and enacts that the expression Central Government should include the Chief Commissioner administering a Part C State under the authority given to him under article 239.\nA contract with the Chief Commissioner would, therefore, under section 9 read with section 3(8) of the General Clauses Act, be a contract with the Central Government, and would operate as a disqualification for election to either House of Parliament under sections 7(d) and 9 of Act No. XLIII of 1951, and it would be a disqualification under section 17 of Act No. XLIX of 1951, for election to the Legislative Assembly of the State.\nWe must accordingly hold that in view of section 3(8) of the General Clauses Act, a contract with the Chief Commissioner in a Part C State is a contract with the Central Government, and that would be a disqualification for election to the Legislative Assembly under section 17 of Act No. XLIX of 1951 read with section 7(8) of Act No. XLIII of 1951.\nThis conclusion, however, can result in no advantage to the petitioner, as the further finding of the Election Tribunal is that no contracts of the respondent with the Himachal Pradesh Government were proved to have been subsisting at the material period. \nThat finding is, for the reasons already given, not open to attack in this appeal, and is sufficient answer to the objection that the respondent was disqualified under section 17\nHis contention is that having regard to the nature of the duties of a polling agent as laid down by the Rules and furtfier elucidated by the instructions contained in the Election Manual issued by the Government, the polling agent must be held to be interested in the candidate for whom he acts as polling agent, and that his employment would therefore be hit by section 123(8).\nAny competent person, whether an elector or not, may be appointed as polling agent, provided he be not the returning officer, the acting or deputy acting returning officer, or an officer or clerk appointed under P.E.R., r. 27, or a partner or clerk of any of them.\nsection 41 of Act No. XLIII of 1951 contains a prohibition against the appointment of certain persons as election agents, there is none such with, reference to the appointment of polling agents under section 46 of the Act. To hold that Government servants are, as such and as a class, disqualified to act as polling agents would be to engraft an exception to the statute, which is not there. Accordingly, we reaffirm the view taken by us that the appointment of a Government servant as polling agent does not, without more, contravene section 123(8).", + "expert_3": "This is an application for review of the judgment of this Court in Civil Appeal No. 52 of 1954. That was an appeal against an order of the Election Tribunal, Himachal Pradesh (Simla), dismissing a petition to set aside the election of the respondent to the Legislative Assembly, Himachal Pradesh, from the Rohru Constituency.\nTwo points were raised at the hearing of the appeal before us One was that the respondent was disqualified for election to the Assembly under section 17 of Act No. XLIX of 1951, read with section 7(d) of Act No. XLIII of 195 1, by reason of the fact that he was interested in contracts for the supply of Ayurvedic Medicines to the Himachal Pradesh Government, and the other, that he had appointed Government servants as polling agents, and had thereby contravened section 123(8) of Act No\nOn the first question, we held that, on a true construction of section 17, what would be a disqualification for election to either House of Parliament under article 102 would, under that section, be disqualification for election to the Legislatures of Part C States, and that the disqualification under section 7 (d) of Act No\nXLIII of 1951 would accordingly be a disqualification under section 17 of Act No. XLIX of 195 1\nheld that article 239 had not the effect of merging States with the Central Government, and converting contracts with the States into those with the Central Government\ndefinition of Central Government in section 3(8)(b)(ii) of the General Clauses Act. It is as follows Central Governmnet shall in relation to anything done or to be done after the commencement of the Constitution, mean the President and shall include in relation to the administration of a Part C State, the Chief Commissioner or Lieutenant-Governor or Government of a neighbouring State or other authority acting within the scope of the authority given to him or it under article 239 or article 243 of the Constitution, as the case may be.\nWe are unable to agree that section 3(8) has the effect of putting an end to the status of Part C -States as independent units, distinct from the Union Government under the Constitution. It merely recognies that those States are centrally administered through the President under article 239, and enacts that the expression Central Government should include the Chief Commissioner administering a Part C State under the authority given to him under article 239.\nSection 3(8) does not affect the status of Part C States as distinct entities having their own Legislature and judiciary, as provided in articles 239 and 240.\nIts true scope will be clear if, adapting it, we substitute for the words Central Government in section 9 of Act No. XLIII of 195 1, the words the Chief commissioner acting within the scope of the authority given to him under article 239. \nA contract with the Chief Commissioner would, therefore, under section 9 read with section 3(8) of the General Clauses Act, be a contract with the Central Government, and would operate as a disqualification for election to either House of Parliament under sections 7(d) and 9 of Act No. XLIII of 1951, and it would be a disqualification under section 17 of Act No\nfor election to the Legislative Assembly of the State\nIt is argued for the respondent that this construction would lead to this anomaly that whereas in the States in Part A or Part B a contract with the State would operate as disqualification only for election to the State Legislatures, such a contract would in Part C States operate as a disqualification to be chosen, both to the State Legislature and to either House of Parliament\nThat anomaly is undoubtedly there. But the contrary conclusion also involves the anomaly already pointed out, that in Part C States a contract with the State Government is not a disqualification for election even to the State Legislature, as it is in Parts A and B States. Whatever the anomaly, in our view, the proper course is to give effect to the plain language of the statute. We must accordingly hold that in view of section 3(8) of the General Clauses Act, a contract with the Chief Commissioner in a Part C State is a contract with the Central Government, and that would be a disqualification for election to the Legislative Assembly under section 17 of Act No.\nread with section 7(8) of Act No.\nThis conclusion, however, can result in no advantage to the petitioner, as the further finding of the Election Tribunal is that no contracts of the respondent with the Himachal Pradesh Government were proved to have been subsisting at the material period. \nThat finding is, for the reasons already given, not open to attack in this appeal, and is sufficient answer to the objection that the respondent was disqualified under section 17.\nThe second point that was argued before us in appeal was that the respondent had appointed certain Government servants to act as polling agents, and had thereby committed a major corrupt practice under section 123(8) of Act No. XLIII of 1951.\nIn rejecting this contention we observed that, as an abstract proposition of law, the mere appointment of a Government servant as a polling agent in itself and without more is not an infringement of section 123(8)\nExamining closely the duties of a polling agent under the Rules and under the Election Manual, they can be grouped under three categories\nThe first category relates to the period of time antecedent to the recording of votes. The duties of the polling agent at this stage are to see that the ballot boxes are, to start with, empty, that the names of the candidates and their symbols are correctly set out thereon, that the slits in the boxes are in an open position, that the knobs of the slits are properly secured, and that the boxes are properly bolted and sealed. These are duties which are cast on the presiding officer and the polling officers as well, and as these are matters to be attended to before any recording or votes begins, it is difficult to see how they -can be said to assist in the furtherance of the election prospects of any one candidate more than of any other. The second stage is when the polling is actually in progress\nThe duty of the polling agent at this stage is to identify the voters\nRule 27 provides that when there is a doubt as to the identity of a voter, the presiding officer may interrogate the voter and that be should do so, if so required by a polling agent. Under rule 30, it is open to the polling agent to challenge any voter on the ground that he is not the person whose name is entered in the voters list, and when such objection is taken, it is the duty of the presiding officer to hold an enquiry and pass an order.\nThe object of these Rules is to prevent personation, and that is a matter in which the duty is cast equally on the presiding officer.\nRule 24 provides that, The presiding officer may employ at the polling station such persons as he thinks fit to assist him-or any polling officer in identifying the electors.\nThe work of the polling agent under rules 27 and 30 is of the same character, and it cannot in itself be said to further the election prospects of any particular candidate\nThe third stage is reached after the polling is over. Then the boxes are to be examined with. a view to find out whether the slits are open and the seals intact, the object of these provisions being to ensure that the ballot boxes had not been tampered with during the time of actual polling. Then the unused ballot papers, the tendered ballot papers and other material documents-are required to be put in separate packages, and the polling agents have the right to seal all of them. It cannot be said that in carrying out these duties the polling agent advances the election prospects of the candidate, as they admittedly relate to a stage after the completion of the polling. Indeed, the work of the polling agent both in the first stage and in the last stage is similar in character, and neither can be said to contravene section 123(8).\nthe duty to be performed by the polling agents at the several booths is of the same character, it would be desirable that they should all be assembled and their duties explained to them. This has no bearing on the question whether those duties are such as must inherently promote the election prospects of the candidate\nAny competent person, whether an elector or not, may be appointed as polling agent, provided he be not the returning officer, the acting or deputy acting returning officer, or an officer or clerk appointed under P.E.R., r. 27, or a partner or clerk of any of them.\nit must be noted that while section 41 of Act No. XLIII of 1951 contains a prohibition against the appointment of certain persons as election agents, there is none such with, reference to the appointment of polling agents under section 46 of the Act. To hold that Government servants are, as such and as a class, disqualified to act as polling agents would be to engraft an exception to the statute, which is not there. Accordingly, we reaffirm the view taken by us that the appointment of a Government servant as polling agent does not, without more, contravene section 123(8)", + "expert_4": "This is an application for review of the judgment of this Court in Civil Appeal No. 52 of 1954.\nThat was an appeal against an order of the Election Tribunal, Himachal Pradesh (Simla), dismissing a petition to set aside the election of the respondent to the Legislative Assembly, Himachal Pradesh, from the Rohru Constituency.\nTwo points were raised at the hearing of the appeal before us One was that the respondent was disqualified for election to the Assembly under section 17 of Act No. XLIX of 1951, read with section 7(d) of Act No.\nXLIII of 195 1, by reason of the fact that he was interested in contracts for the supply of Ayurvedic Medicines to the Himachal Pradesh Government, and the other, that he had appointed Government servants as polling agents, and had thereby contravened section 123(8) of Act No. XLIII of 1951.\nOn the first question, we held that, on a true construction of section 17, what would be a disqualification for election to either House of Parliament under article 102 would, under that section, be disqualification for election to the Legislatures of Part C States, and that the disqualification under section 7 (d) of Act No. XLIII of 1951 would accordingly be a disqualification under section 17 of Act No.\nXLIX of 195 1.\nA further contention was then raised on behalf of the respondent that even if section 7(d) were to be imported into section 17, that would not disqualify him, because under that section, the disqualification must be to being elected to either House of Parliament, and that under sections 7 and 9 of Act No. XLIII of 1951, a contract to operate as a disqualification to the election to either House of Parliament must be, with the Central Government, whereas the contracts of the respondent were with the Government of Himachal Pradesh.\nThe answer of the petitioner to this contention was that under article 239 the administration of Part C States was vested in the President acting through the Chief Commissioner or the Lieutenant-Governor, and that the contracts of the respondent with the Chief Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh, must be held to be contracts with the Central Government.\nWe, however, disagreed with this con- tention, and held that article 239 had not the effect of merging States with the Central Government, and converting contracts with the States into those with the Central Government.\nIn this application, Mr. Chatterjee appearing for the petitioner invites our attention to the definition of Central Government in section 3(8)(b)(ii) of the General Clauses Act. It is as follows Central Governmnet shall in relation to anything done or to be done after the commencement of the Constitution, mean the President and shall include in relation to the administration of a Part C State, the Chief Commissioner or Lieutenant-Governor or Government of a neighbouring State or other authority acting within the scope of the authority given to him or it under article 239 or article 243 of the Constitution, as the case may be.\nHe argues that by force of this definition, contracts with the Chief Commissioner of Himachal Pradesh must be treated as contracts with the Central Government, and that in consequence, the respondent was disqualified for election under section 17 of Act No.\nAs against this, Mr. Veda Vyas for the respondent relies on the definition of State in section 3(60)(b) of the General Clauses Act, which runs as follows State Government as respects anything done or to be done after the commencement of the Constitution, shall mean, in a Part A State, the Governor, in a Part B State the Rajpramukh, and in a Part C State the Central Government.\nHis contention is that there being in the Constitution a fundamental distinction between the Government of the Union and Government of the States, section 3(8) of the General Clauses Act should be so construed as not to destroy that distinction, and that having regard to the definition of State in section 3(60), it must be held that to the extent the Central Government administers Part C States under article 239, its character is that of the State Governments.\nWe are unable to agree that section 3(8) has the effect of putting an end to the status of Part C -States as independent units, distinct from the Union Government under the Constitution. It merely recognies that those States are centrally administered through the President under article 239, and enacts that the expression Central Government should include the Chief Commissioner administering a Part C State under the authority given to him under article 239.\nSection 3(8) does not affect the status of Part C States as distinct entities having their own Legislature and judiciary, as provided in articles 239 and 240.\nIts true scope will be clear if, adapting it, we substitute for the words Central Government in section 9 of Act No. XLIII of 195 1, the words the Chief commissioner acting within the scope of the authority given to him under article 239. \nA contract with the Chief Commissioner would, therefore, under section 9 read with section 3(8) of the General Clauses Act, be a contract with the Central Government, and would operate as a disqualification for election to either House of Parliament under sections 7(d) and 9 of Act No. XLIII of 1951, and it would be a disqualification under section 17 of Act No. XLIX of 1951, for election to the Legislative Assembly of the State. It is argued for the respondent that this construction would lead to this anomaly that whereas in the States in Part A or Part B a contract with the State would operate as disqualification only for election to the State Legislatures, such a contract would in Part C States operate as a disqualification to be chosen, both to the State Legislature and to either House of Parliament.\nThat anomaly is undoubtedly there.\nBut the contrary conclusion also involves the anomaly already pointed out, that in Part C States a contract with the State Government is not a disqualification for election even to the State Legislature, as it is in Parts A and B States.\nWhatever the anomaly, in our view, the proper course is to give effect to the plain language of the statute.\nWe must accordingly hold that in view of section 3(8) of the General Clauses Act, a contract with the Chief Commissioner in a Part C State is a contract with the Central Government, and that would be a disqualification for election to the Legislative Assembly under section 17 of Act No. XLIX of 1951 read with section 7(8) of Act No. XLIII of 1951.\nThis conclusion, however, can result in no advantage to the petitioner, as the further finding of the Election Tribunal is that no contracts of the respondent with the Himachal Pradesh Government were proved to have been subsisting at the material period.\nThat finding is, for the reasons already given, not open to attack in this appeal, and is sufficient answer to the objection that the respondent was disqualified under section 17.\nThe second point that was argued before us in appeal was that the respondent had appointed certain Government servants to act as polling agents, and had thereby committed a major corrupt practice under section 123(8) of Act No. XLIII of 1951.\nIn rejecting this contention we observed that, as an abstract proposition of law, the mere appointment of a Government servant as a polling agent in itself and without more is not an infringement of section 123(8).\nThe correctness of this conclusion is now challenged\nHis contention is that having regard to the nature of the duties of a polling agent as laid down by the Rules and furtfier elucidated by the instructions contained in the Election Manual issued by the Government, the polling agent must be held to be interested in the candidate for whom he acts as polling agent, and that his employment would therefore be hit by section 123(8).\nExamining closely the duties of a polling agent under the Rules and under the Election Manual, they can be grouped under three categories.\nThe first category relates to the period of time antecedent to the recording of votes.\nThe duties of the polling agent at this stage are to see that the ballot boxes are, to start with, empty, that the names of the candidates and their symbols are correctly set out thereon, that the slits in the boxes are in an open position, that the knobs of the slits are properly secured, and that the boxes are properly bolted and sealed.\nThe second stage is when the polling is actually in progress.\nThe duty of the polling agent at this stage is to identify the voters.\nRule 27 provides that when there is a doubt as to the identity of a voter, the presiding officer may interrogate the voter and that be should do so, if so required by a polling agent.\nThe work of the polling agent under rules 27 and 30 is of the same character, and it cannot in itself be said to further the election prospects of any particular candidate.\nThe third stage is reached after the polling is over.\nThen the boxes are to be examined with. a view to find out whether the slits are open and the seals intact, the object of these provisions being to ensure that the ballot boxes had not been tampered with during the time of actual polling.\nThen the unused ballot papers, the tendered ballot papers and other material documents-are required to be put in separate packages, and the polling agents have the right to seal all of them. It cannot be said that in carrying out these duties the polling agent advances the election prospects of the candidate, as they admittedly relate to a stage after the completion of the polling. Indeed, the work of the polling agent both in the first stage and in the last stage is similar in character, and neither can be said to contravene section 123(8).\nReliance was placed by Mr. Chatterjee on the following passage in Parkers Election Agent and Returning Officer\nWhat that passage means is that as the duty to be performed by the polling agents at the several booths is of the same character, it would be desirable that they should all be assembled and their duties explained to them.\nThis has no bearing on the question whether those duties are such as must inherently promote the election prospects of the candidate.\nA passage which is more in point is the one at page 18, mentioning who could be appointed as polling agents.\nIt is as follows Any competent person, whether an elector or not, may be appointed as polling agent, provided he be not the returning officer, the acting or deputy acting returning officer, or an officer or clerk appointed under P.E.R., r. 27, or a partner or clerk of any of them. \nIn this connection, it must be noted that while section 41 of Act No. XLIII of 1951 contains a prohibition against the appointment of certain persons as election agents, there is none such with, reference to the appointment of polling agents under section 46 of the Act.\nTo hold that Government servants are, as such and as a class, disqualified to act as polling agents would be to engraft an exception to the statute, which is not there.\nAccordingly, we reaffirm the view taken by us that the appointment of a Government servant as polling agent does not, without more, contravene section 123(8).\nif it is made out that the candidate or his agent had abused the right to appoint a Government servant as polling agent by exploiting the situation for furthering his election prospects, then the matter can be dealt with as an infringement of section 123(8).", + "expert_5": "It is as follows Central Governmnet shall in relation to anything done or to be done after the commencement of the Constitution, mean the President and shall include in relation to the administration of a Part C State, the Chief Commissioner or Lieutenant-Governor or Government of a neighbouring State or other authority acting within the scope of the authority given to him or it under article 239 or article 243 of the Constitution, as the case may be.\nIt merely recognies that those States are centrally administered through the President under article 239, and enacts that the expression Central Government should include the Chief Commissioner administering a Part C State under the authority given to him under article 239.\nSection 3(8) does not affect the status of Part C States as distinct entities having their own Legislature and judiciary, as provided in articles 239 and 240.\nA contract with the Chief Commissioner would, therefore, under section 9 read with section 3(8) of the General Clauses Act, be a contract with the Central Government, and would operate as a disqualification for election to either House of Parliament under sections 7(d) and 9 of Act No. XLIII of 1951, and it would be a disqualification under section 17 of Act No. XLIX of 1951, for election to the Legislative Assembly of the State.\nBut the contrary conclusion also involves the anomaly already pointed out, that in Part C States a contract with the State Government is not a disqualification for election even to the State Legislature, as it is in Parts A and B States.\nWhatever the anomaly, in our view, the proper course is to give effect to the plain language of the statute.\nThis conclusion, however, can result in no advantage to the petitioner, as the further finding of the Election Tribunal is that no contracts of the respondent with the Himachal Pradesh Government were proved to have been subsisting at the material period. \nThat finding is, for the reasons already given, not open to attack in this appeal, and is sufficient answer to the objection that the respondent was disqualified under section 17.\nthe mere appointment of a Government servant as a polling agent in itself and without more is not an infringement of section 123(8).\nThese are duties which are cast on the presiding officer and the polling officers as well, and as these are matters to be attended to before any recording or votes begins, it is difficult to see how they -can be said to assist in the furtherance of the election prospects of any one candidate more than of any other.\nThe work of the polling agent under rules 27 and 30 is of the same character, and it cannot in itself be said to further the election prospects of any particular candidate.\nIt cannot be said that in carrying out these duties the polling agent advances the election prospects of the candidate, as they admittedly relate to a stage after the completion of the polling.\nAs regards the second stage, as already stated in our judgment, the duty of polling agent is merely to identify a voter, and that could not by itself and without more be said to further the election prospects of the candidate.\nIt is as follows Any competent person, whether an elector or not, may be appointed as polling agent, provided he be not the returning officer, the acting or deputy acting returning officer, or an officer or clerk appointed under P.E.R., r. 27, or a partner or clerk of any of them.\nwhile section 41 of Act No. XLIII of 1951 contains a prohibition against the appointment of certain persons as election agents, there is none such with, reference to the appointment of polling agents under section 46 of the Act.\nTo hold that Government servants are, as such and as a class, disqualified to act as polling agents would be to engraft an exception to the statute, which is not there." + }, + "1954_13": { + "expert_1": "The question in this case is whether an appeal lies to this court under section 476B of the Criminal Procedure Code from an order of a Division Bench of a High Court directing the filing of a complaint for perjury.\nThe first question we have to decide is whether there is a right. of appeal. That turns on the true meaning of-section 476B of the Criminal Procedure Code read with section 195 (3).\nFirst, that a right of appeal has been expressly conferred by section 476B provided there is a higher forum to which an appeal can be made and second that the appellate forum has been designated in an artificial way. The appeal lies to the court to which the former court is subordinate within the meaning of section 195 (3).\nThe only court to which an appeal ordinarily lies from the appealable decrees and sentences of a Division Bench of a High Court is this court. \n Therefore, a Division Bench of a High court is a court subordinate to this court within the meaning of section 195 (3) accordingly an appeal lies to this court from an order of a Division Bench under section 476 It was contended that there is no ordinary right of appeal to this court and that such rights as there are those expressly conferred by the Constitution in a very limited and circumscribed set of circumstances, therefore, such appeals as lie to this court cannot be said to lie ordinarily. We do not agree. Such an argument concentrates attention on the word ordinarily and ignored the words appealable decrees or sentences. Before we can apply the definition we have first to see whether there is a class of decrees or sentences in the court under consideration which areat all open to appeal. If there are not, the matter- ends and there is no right of appeal under section 476.B. If there are, then we have to see to which court those appeals will ordinarily lie.\nIt is evident that the only court to which the appealable decrees and sentences of a Division Bench of a High Court can lie is the Supreme Court. \n There is no other court to which an appeal can be made. It follows that is the ordinary course in the case of all appealable decrees and sentences and that consequently this is the court to which such appeals will ordinarily lie. As there is a right of appeal we have next to consider the matter on its merits and there the only relevant consideration is whether it is expedient in the interests of justice that an enquiry should be 1148 made and a, complaint filed.\nThe High Court has scrutinised the. evidence minutely and has disclosed ample material on which a judicial mind could reasonably reach the conclusion that there is matter here which requires investigation in a criminal court and that it is expedient in the interests of justice to have it enquired into. We have not examined the evidence for ourselves and we express no opinion on the merits of the respective cases but after a careful reading of the judgment, of the High Court and the report of the District Judge we can find no reason for interfering with the High Courts discretion on that score. We do not intend to say more than this about the merits as we are anxious not to prejudge or prejudice the case of either side. \n The learned Judges of the High Court have also very -rightly observed in their order under section 476 that they were not expressing any opinion on the guilt or innocence of the appellants.\nWe were informed at the hearing that two further sets of proceedings arising out of the same facts are now, pending against the appellants. One is two civil suits for damages for wrongful confinement. The other,is two criminal prosecutions under section 344, Indian Penal Code, for wrongful confinement, one against each Sub-Inspector. It was said that the simultaneous prosecution of these, matters will embarrass the accused. But after the hearing of the appeal we received information that the two criminal prosecutions have been closed with liberty to file fresh complaints when the papers are ready, as the High Court records were not available on the application of the accused As these prosecutions are not pending at the moment, the objection regarding them does not arise but we can see that the simultaneous prosecution of the present criminal proceedings out of which this appeal arises and the civil suits will embarrass the accused. We have therefore to determine which should be stayed.\nAs between the civil and the criminal proceedings we are of the opinion that the criminal matters should 1149 be given precedence.\nNo hard and fast rule ban. be laid down but we do not consider that the possibility of conflicting decisions in the civil and criminal courts is a relevant consideration. The law envisages such an eventuality when it expressly refrains from making the decision of one court binding on the other, or even relevant, except for certain limited purposes, such as sentence or damages. \n The only relevant consideration here is the likelihood of embarrassment. Another factor which weighs with us is that a civil suit often drags on for years and it is undesirable that a criminal prosecution should wait till everybody concerned has forgotten all about the crime. The public interests demand that criminal justice should be swift and sure that the guilty should be punished while the events are still fresh in the public mind and that the innocent should be absolved as early as is consistent with a fair and impartial trial. Another reason is that it is undesirable to let things glide till memories have grown too dim to trust. This,however, is not a hard and fast rule. Special considerations obtaining in any particular case might make some other course more expedient and just.\nBut in this case we are of the view that the civil suits should be stayed till the criminal proceedings have finished.", + "expert_2": "The question in this case is whether an appeal lies to this court under section 476B of the Criminal Procedure Code from an order of a Division Bench of a High Court directing the filing of a complaint for perjury.\nTwo persons, Govindan and Damodaran, filed petitions under section 491 of the Criminal Procedure Code for release claiming that they had been illegally detained by two Sub- Inspectors of Police who are the appellants before us.\nConsiderable evidence was recorded and documents were filed and the District Judge reported that in his opinion the statements made by the two Sub-Inspectors were correct. The High Court disagreed and, after an elaborate examination of the evidence, reached the conclusion that the petitioners were telling the truth and not the Sub- Inspectors.\nthe petitioners applied to the High Court under section 476 of the Criminal Procedure Code and 1146 asked that the Sub-InsPectors be prosecuted for perjury under section 193, Indian Penal Code. The applications were granted and the Deputy Registrar of the High Court was directed to make the necessary complaints. The Sub-Inspeetors thereupon asked for leave to appeal to this court. Leave was refused on the ground that no appeal lies, but leave was granted under article 132 as an interpretation of articles 134 (1) and 372 of the Constitution was involved. \n The Sub Inspectors have appealed here against that order as also against the order under section 476.\nFirst, that a right of appeal has been expressly conferred by section 476B provided there is a higher forum to which an appeal can be made and second that the appellate forum has been designated in an artificial way.\nThe appeal lies to the court to which the former court is subordinate within the meaning of section 195 (3). But sub. ordinate does not bear its ordinary meaning. It is used as a term of art and has been given a special meaning by reason of the definition in section 195 (3) a fiction has been imposed by the use of the word deemed., We have accordingly next to examine the content of the fiction. 1147 The section says that the court making the order under section 476 shall be deemed to be subordinate to the court (a) to which appeals ordinarily lie (b) from the appelable decrees or sentences of such former court. Now the former court in this case is a Division Bench of the High Court.\nWe do not agree. Such an argument concentrates attention on the word ordinarily and ignored the words appealable decrees or sentences. Before we can apply the definition we have first to see whether there is a class of decrees or sentences in the court under consideration which areat all open to appeal.\nIt is evident that the only court to which the appealable decrees and sentences of a Division Bench of a High Court can lie is the Supreme Court. \n There is no other court to which an appeal can be made. It follows that is the ordinary course in the case of all appealable decrees and sentences and that consequently this is the court to which such appeals will ordinarily lie.\nWe have not examined the evidence for ourselves and we express no opinion on the merits of the respective cases but after a careful reading of the judgment, of the High Court and the report of the District Judge we can find no reason for interfering with the High Courts discretion on that score. We do not intend to say more than this about the merits as we are anxious not to prejudge or prejudice the case of either side.", + "expert_3": "The question in this case is whether an appeal lies to this court under section 476B of the Criminal Procedure Code from an order of a Division Bench of a High Court directing the filing of a complaint for perjury\nTwo persons, Govindan and Damodaran, filed petitions under section 491 of the Criminal Procedure Code for release claiming that they had been illegally detained by two Sub- Inspectors of Police who are the appellants before us. Govindan said he was being detained by one Sub-Inspector and Damodaran said he was being detained by the other\nBoth the Sub Inspectors said that the petitioners were not in their custody. The first Sub-Inspector, who was concerned with Govindan, said that Govindan had never been arrested by him and had not been in his custody at. any time. The other denied that Damodaran was in his custody\nHe admitted that he had arrested him at one time but said that he had been released long before the petition. Each swore an affidavit in support of his return\nIn view of this conflict between the two sets of statements the High Court directed the District Judge to make an enquiry. Considerable evidence was recorded and documents were filed and the District Judge reported that in his opinion the statements made by the two Sub-Inspectors were correct. The High Court disagreed and, after an elaborate examination of the evidence, reached the conclusion that the petitioners were telling the truth and not the Sub- Inspectors.\nThe petitioners were however regularly arrested after their petitions and before the High Courts order one was released on bail and the other was remanded to jail custody by an order of a Magistrate. Accordingly their petitions became infructuous and were dismissed.\nAfter this, the petitioners applied to the High Court under section 476 of the Criminal Procedure Code and 1146 asked that the Sub-InsPectors be prosecuted for perjury under section 193, Indian Penal Code. The applications were granted and the Deputy Registrar of the High Court was directed to make the necessary complaints. The Sub-Inspeetors thereupon asked for leave to appeal to this court.\nLeave was refused on the ground that no appeal lies, but leave was granted under article 132 as an interpretation of articles 134 (1) and 372 of the Constitution was involved. \n The Sub Inspectors have appealed here against that order as also against the order under section 476\nIn addition, as an added precaution, they have filed a petition for special leave to appeal under article 136 (1)\nThe first question we have to decide is whether there is a right. of appeal. That turns on the true meaning of-section 476B of the Criminal Procedure Code read with section 195 (3).\nThe relevant portion of the former reads thus - Any person against whom a complaint has been made under section 476 may appeal to the court to which such former court is subordinate within the meaning of section 195 (3) The latter section reads- For the purpose of this section, a court shall be deemed to be subordinate to the court to which appeals ordinarily lie from the appealable decrees or sentences of such former court The rest of the section does not concern us.\nTwo things are evident. First, that a right of appeal has been expressly conferred by section 476B provided there is a higher forum to which an appeal can be made and second that the appellate forum has been designated in an artificial way. The appeal lies to the court to which the former court is subordinate within the meaning of section 195 (3). But sub. ordinate does not bear its ordinary meaning\nIt is used as a term of art and has been given a special meaning by reason of the definition in section 195 (3) a fiction has been imposed by the use of the word deemed., We have accordingly next to examine the content of the fiction. 1147 The section says that the court making the order under section 476 shall be deemed to be subordinate to the court (a) to which appeals ordinarily lie (b) from the appelable decrees or sentences of such former court\nNow the former court in this case is a Division Bench of the High Court. The only court to which an appeal ordinarily lies from the appealable decrees and sentences of a Division Bench of a High Court is this court. \n Therefore, a Division Bench of a High court is a court subordinate to this court within the meaning of section 195 (3) accordingly an appeal lies to this court from an order of a Division Bench under section 476\nBefore we can apply the definition we have first to see whether there is a class of decrees or sentences in the court under consideration which areat all open to appeal. If there are not, the matter- ends and there is no right of appeal under section 476.B. If there are, then we have to see to which court those appeals will ordinarily lie.\nIt is evident that the only court to which the appealable decrees and sentences of a Division Bench of a High Court can lie is the Supreme Court. \n There is no other court to which an appeal can be made.\nIt follows that is the ordinary course in the case of all appealable decrees and sentences and that consequently this is the court to which such appeals will ordinarily lie. As there is a right of appeal we have next to consider the matter on its merits and there the only relevant consideration is whether it is expedient in the interests of justice that an enquiry should be 1148 made and a, complaint filed\nafter a careful reading of the judgment, of the High Court and the report of the District Judge we can find no reason for interfering with the High Courts discretion on that score.\nWe were informed at the hearing that two further sets of proceedings arising out of the same facts are now, pending against the appellants. One is two civil suits for damages for wrongful confinement. The other,is two criminal prosecutions under section 344, Indian Penal Code, for wrongful confinement, one against each Sub-Inspector. It was said that the simultaneous prosecution of these, matters will embarrass the accused. But after the hearing of the appeal we received information that the two criminal prosecutions have been closed with liberty to file fresh complaints when the papers are ready, as the High Court records were not available on the application of the accused As these prosecutions are not pending at the moment, the objection regarding them does not arise but we can see that the simultaneous prosecution of the present criminal proceedings out of which this appeal arises and the civil suits will embarrass the accused.\nWe have therefore to determine which should be stayed. As between the civil and the criminal proceedings we are of the opinion that the criminal matters should 1149 be given precedence. There is some difference of opinion in the High Courts of India on this point.\nwe do not consider that the possibility of conflicting decisions in the civil and criminal courts is a relevant consideration. The law envisages such an eventuality when it expressly refrains from making the decision of one court binding on the other, or even relevant, except for certain limited purposes, such as sentence or damages\nThe only relevant consideration here is the likelihood of embarrassment. Another factor which weighs with us is that a civil suit often drags on for years and it is undesirable that a criminal prosecution should wait till everybody concerned has forgotten all about the crime. The public interests demand that criminal justice should be swift and sure that the guilty should be punished while the events are still fresh in the public mind and that the innocent should be absolved as early as is consistent with a fair and impartial trial.\nAnother reason is that it is undesirable to let things glide till memories have grown too dim to trust\nSpecial considerations obtaining in any particular case might make some other course more expedient and just\nBut in this case we are of the view that the civil suits should be stayed till the criminal proceedings have finished.", + "expert_4": "Appeal under article 132 of the Constitution of India from the Judgment and Order dated the 1st August, 1951, of the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions Nos.1261 and 1263 of 1951.\n-The question in this case is whether an appeal lies to this court under section 476B of the Criminal Procedure Code from an order of a Division Bench of a High Court directing the filing of a complaint for perjury.\nTwo persons, Govindan and Damodaran, filed petitions under section 491 of the Criminal Procedure Code for release claiming that they had been illegally detained by two Sub- Inspectors of Police who are the appellants before us.\nGovindan said he was being detained by one Sub-Inspector and Damodaran said he was being detained by the other.\nBoth the Sub Inspectors said that the petitioners were not in their custody.\nThe first Sub-Inspector, who was concerned with Govindan, said that Govindan had never been arrested by him and had not been in his custody at. any time.\nThe other denied that Damodaran was in his custody.\nHe admitted that he had arrested him at one time but said that he had been released long before the petition.\nEach swore an affidavit in support of his return.\nIn view of this conflict between the two sets of statements the High Court directed the District Judge to make an enquiry. Considerable evidence was recorded and documents were filed and the District Judge reported that in his opinion the statements made by the two Sub-Inspectors were correct.\nThe High Court disagreed and, after an elaborate examination of the evidence, reached the conclusion that the petitioners were telling the truth and not the Sub- Inspectors.\nThe petitioners were however regularly arrested after their petitions and before the High Courts order one was released on bail and the other was remanded to jail custody by an order of a Magistrate. Accordingly their petitions became infructuous and were dismissed.\nAfter this, the petitioners applied to the High Court under section 476 of the Criminal Procedure Code and 1146 asked that the Sub-InsPectors be prosecuted for perjury under section 193, Indian Penal Code.\nThe applications were granted and the Deputy Registrar of the High Court was directed to make the necessary complaints.\nThe Sub-Inspeetors thereupon asked for leave to appeal to this court.\nLeave was refused on the ground that no appeal lies, but leave was granted under article 132 as an interpretation of articles 134 (1) and 372 of the Constitution was involved.\nThe first question we have to decide is whether there is a right. of appeal.\nThat turns on the true meaning of-section 476B of the Criminal Procedure Code read with section 195 (3).\nThe relevant portion of the former reads thus - Any person against whom a complaint has been made under section 476 may appeal to the court to which such former court is subordinate within the meaning of section 195 (3) The latter section reads- For the purpose of this section, a court shall be deemed to be subordinate to the court to which appeals ordinarily lie from the appealable decrees or sentences of such former court The rest of the section does not concern us.\nTwo things are evident.\nFirst, that a right of appeal has been expressly conferred by section 476B provided there is a higher forum to which an appeal can be made and second that the appellate forum has been designated in an artificial way.\nThe appeal lies to the court to which the former court is subordinate within the meaning of section 195 (3). But sub. ordinate does not bear its ordinary meaning.\nIt is used as a term of art and has been given a special meaning by reason of the definition in section 195 (3) a fiction has been imposed by the use of the word deemed., We have accordingly next to examine the content of the fiction. 1147 The section says that the court making the order under section 476 shall be deemed to be subordinate to the court (a) to which appeals ordinarily lie (b) from the appelable decrees or sentences of such former court.\nthe former court in this case is a Division Bench of the High Court.\nThe only court to which an appeal ordinarily lies from the appealable decrees and sentences of a Division Bench of a High Court is this court.\nTherefore, a Division Bench of a High court is a court subordinate to this court within the meaning of section 195 (3) accordingly an appeal lies to this court from an order of a Division Bench under section 476 It was contended that there is no ordinary right of appeal to this court and that such rights as there are those expressly conferred by the Constitution in a very limited and circumscribed set of circumstances, therefore, such appeals as lie to this court cannot be said to lie ordinarily.\nWe do not agree. Such an argument concentrates attention on the word ordinarily and ignored the words appealable decrees or sentences.\nBefore we can apply the definition we have first to see whether there is a class of decrees or sentences in the court under consideration which areat all open to appeal.\nIf there are not, the matter- ends and there is no right of appeal under section 476.B.\nIf there are, then we have to see to which court those appeals will ordinarily lie.\nIt is evident that the only court to which the appealable decrees and sentences of a Division Bench of a High Court can lie is the Supreme Court. \n There is no other court to which an appeal can be made.\nIt follows that is the ordinary course in the case of all appealable decrees and sentences and that consequently this is the court to which such appeals will ordinarily lie.\nAs there is a right of appeal we have next to consider the matter on its merits and there the only relevant consideration is whether it is expedient in the interests of justice that an enquiry should be 1148 made and a, complaint filed.\nThat involves a careful balancing of many factors.\nThe High Court has scrutinised the. evidence minutely and has disclosed ample material on which a judicial mind could reasonably reach the conclusion that there is matter here which requires investigation in a criminal court and that it is expedient in the interests of justice to have it enquired into.\nwe can find no reason for interfering with the High Courts discretion on that score.\nWe do not intend to say more than this about the merits as we are anxious not to prejudge or prejudice the case of either side.\nThe learned Judges of the High Court have also very -rightly observed in their order under section 476 that they were not expressing any opinion on the guilt or innocence of the appellants.\nAs between the civil and the criminal proceedings we are of the opinion that the criminal matters should 1149 be given precedence.\nNo hard and fast rule ban. be laid down but we do not consider that the possibility of conflicting decisions in the civil and criminal courts is a relevant consideration.\nThe law envisages such an eventuality when it expressly refrains from making the decision of one court binding on the other, or even relevant, except for certain limited purposes, such as sentence or damages.\nAnother factor which weighs with us is that a civil suit often drags on for years and it is undesirable that a criminal prosecution should wait till everybody concerned has forgotten all about the crime. The public interests demand that criminal justice should be swift and sure that the guilty should be punished while the events are still fresh in the public mind and that the innocent should be absolved as early as is consistent with a fair and impartial trial.\nSpecial considerations obtaining in any particular case might make some other course more expedient and just. For example, the civil case or the other criminal proceeding may be so hear its end as to make it inexpedient to stay it in order to give precedence to a prosecution order of under section 476. But in this case we are of the view that the civil suits should be stayed till the criminal proceedings have finished.", + "expert_5": "The High Court disagreed and, after an elaborate examination of the evidence, reached the conclusion that the petitioners were telling the truth and not the Sub- Inspectors.\nAny person against whom a complaint has been made under section 476 may appeal to the court to which such former court is subordinate within the meaning of section 195 (3)\nThe latter section reads- For the purpose of this section, a court shall be deemed to be subordinate to the court to which appeals ordinarily lie from the appealable decrees or sentences of such former court\nThe only court to which an appeal ordinarily lies from the appealable decrees and sentences of a Division Bench of a High Court is this court\nTherefore, a Division Bench of a High court is a court subordinate to this court within the meaning of section 195 (3) accordingly an appeal lies to this court from an order of a Division Bench under section 476\nBefore we can apply the definition we have first to see whether there is a class of decrees or sentences in the court under consideration which areat all open to appeal. If there are not, the matter- ends and there is no right of appeal under section 476.B. If there are, then we have to see to which court those appeals will ordinarily lie.\nIt is evident that the only court to which the appealable decrees and sentences of a Division Bench of a High Court can lie is the Supreme Court. \n There is no other court to which an appeal can be made. It follows that is the ordinary course in the case of all appealable decrees and sentences and that consequently this is the court to which such appeals will ordinarily lie.\nThe High Court has scrutinised the. evidence minutely and has disclosed ample material on which a judicial mind could reasonably reach the conclusion that there is matter here which requires investigation in a criminal court and that it is expedient in the interests of justice to have it enquired into.\nafter a careful reading of the judgment, of the High Court and the report of the District Judge we can find no reason for interfering with the High Courts discretion on that score.\nthey were not expressing any opinion on the guilt or innocence of the appellants.\nAs between the civil and the criminal proceedings we are of the opinion that the criminal matters should 1149 be given precedence.\nwe do not consider that the possibility of conflicting decisions in the civil and criminal courts is a relevant consideration.\nThe law envisages such an eventuality when it expressly refrains from making the decision of one court binding on the other, or even relevant, except for certain limited purposes, such as sentence or damages.\nAnother factor which weighs with us is that a civil suit often drags on for years and it is undesirable that a criminal prosecution should wait till everybody concerned has forgotten all about the crime.\nThe public interests demand that criminal justice should be swift and sure that the guilty should be punished while the events are still fresh in the public mind and that the innocent should be absolved as early as is consistent with a fair and impartial trial.\nAnother reason is that it is undesirable to let things glide till memories have grown too dim to trust." + }, + "1954_144": { + "expert_1": "This is an appeal by special leave against the decision of the Delhi Election Tribunal, dated the 11th November, 1952, in Election Petition No. 10 of 1952. The appellant Jagan Nath was elected a member of the Delhi State Legislative Assembly from Constituency No. 25 (Roshanara) of the Delhi State. \nThe polling in this constituency took place on the 14th January, 1952. On the 26th April, 1952, which was the last date under the law for the presentation of an election petition, Jaswant Singh (respondent No. 1) presented such a petition before the Secretary of the Election Commission at New Delhi challenging the election of the appellant and contesting the order of the Returning Officer rejecting his nomination paper. In the petition he impleaded as respondents, Brahma Sarup, Ram Prashad Poddar and the appellant, Jagan Nath, but he omitted to implead, as required by section 82 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, Baijnath, one of the candidates, whose nomination had been accepted but who had withdrawn his candidature subsequently. On the 14th July, 1952, the Election Commissioner appointed an Election Tribunal comprising respondents 5 to 7. \nThis appointment was published in the Gazette of India on the 26th July, 1952, and the election petition after due publication was referred to the tribunal. On the 26th August, 1952, which was the first date of hearing before the tribunal, the appellant raised a preliminary objection that the omission to implead Baijnath, a duly nominated candidate as a respondent in the petition.- was fatal to its maintainability. The petitioner contended that Baijnath was neither a necessary nor a proper party and that in any event the non-joinder of a party. was not fatal to the petition in view of the provisions of Order 1, rule 9, Civil Procedure Code. In the alternative, it was claimed that if it was considered that he was a necessary or proper party, permission may be given to the petitioner to implead him. The tribunal decided the preliminary point in favour of the petitioner and held that the non-joinder of Baijnath as a respondent was not fatal to the petition. On the finding, however, that Baijnath was a proper party to be impleaded in the case, the tribunal directed that he added as a respondent in the petition and notice of the petition be served on him. In the view of the tribunal Baijnath was not a necessary party in the sense that in his absence no effective decision could be given in the case and that being a proper party, there was no obstacle to his being joined as a respondent even after the expiry of the period of limitation prescribed for making the petition. \nThe appellant being dissatisfied with this decision, made an application to the Punjab High Court under articles 226 and 227.of the Constitution of India for the issue of a writ of certiorari quashing the order of the tribunal on the ground that it was without jurisdiction and for an order that the election petition be dismissed as there was no valid petition before the Election Tribunal for trial. This petition was summarily rejected by the High Court on the 27th November, 1952. On a petition presented to this court under article 136 of the Constitution, special leave was granted by this court. In this appeal it was contended before us that the Election Tribunal was not a court of general jurisdiction, that it was established by the Representation of the People Act, 1951, for the special purpose of trying election petitions, that its jurisdiction was derived from the statute upon certain specified terms and conditions precedent contained in the statute itself and that it had no general and inherent powers of an existing court and that being so, if the terms and conditions precedent prescribed by the statute were not complied with, it had no jurisdiction to act.\nThe general rule is well settled that the statutory requirements of election law must be strictly observed and that an election contest is not an action at law or a suit in equity but is a purely statutory proceeding unknown to the common law and that the court possesses no common law power.\nIt is also well settled that it is a sound principle of natural justice that the success of a candidate who has won at an election should not be lightly interfered with and any petition seeking such interference must strictly conform to the requirements of the law. None of these propositions however have any application if the special law itself confers authority on a tribunal to proceed with a petition in accordance with certain procedure and when it does not state the consequences of non-compliance with certain procedural requirements laid down by it. It is always to be borne in mind that though the election of a successful candidate is not to be lightly interfered with, one of the essentials of that law is also to safeguard the purity of the election process and also to see that people do not get elected by flagrant breaches of that law or by corrupt practices. In cases where the election law does not prescribe the consequence, or does not lay down penalty for non-compliance with certain procedural requirements of that law, the jurisdiction of the tribunal entrusted with the trial of the case is not affected.\nIt is significant that both the Election Commission and the tribunal have been given powers in express terms to dismiss an election petition which does not comply with the requirements of sections 81, 83 or 117, but no such powers are given to dismiss a petition in limine which does not comply with the provisions of section 82. Such a petition can only be dismissed at the conclusion of the trial and on grounds sufficient to dismiss it (section 98).\nThese provisions suggest that if any proper party is omitted from the lists of respondents, such a defect is not fatal and the tribunal is entitled to deal with it under the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, Order I, rules 9, 10 and 13.\nIn our opinion, the tribunal rightly disallowed the preliminary objection.\nIt will be sufficient to say. that we are in entire agreement with those decisions which have held that non- compliance with the provisions of section 82 is not fatal to the petition. The matter has to be determined in accordance with the rules of the Code of Civil Procedure which have Is been made expressly applicable.\nAs regards the omission of section 82 from the provisions of section 85, it was observed that the Election Commission can at once discover whether the provisions of sections 81, 83 and 117 are complied with but the same cannot be said about the requirements of section 82 and that the Election, Commission will have to hold an inquiry as to who were the candidates duly nominated before determining whether all of them had been joined or not, that this burden of inquiry was not thrown on the Commission but it was left for the determination of the tribunal, and hence it was that section 82 was not included in section 85. Both the reasons given by the tribunal cannot, in our opinion, be sustained. The provisions of section 82 are in terms similar to the provisions of Order XXXIV, rule I of the Code of Civil Procedure. Therein it is provided that all persons having an interest either in the mortgage security or in the right of redemption shall be joined as parties to any suit relating to the mortgage. There is ample authority for the view that this is merely a directory provision and non-joinder of any party is not a fatal defect and a decree can be passed so far as the parties actually on record are concerned unless the party omitted is a necessary party in the sense that in his absence no relief could be given at all even as regards parties actually on record. \n There is no valid reason for treating the word shall in section 82 in a manner different from the same word used in Order XXXIV, rule 1, Civil Procedure Code. It is one of the rules of construction that a provision like this is not mandatory unless non-compliance with it is made penal. As regards the dictum of the Lucknow Tribunal that no inquiry is required to be made in the case of non-compliance with the provisions of sections 81, 83 and 117 but that an inquiry would be necessary to determine whether certain parties were nominated candidates or not, in our opinion it cannot stand scrutiny.\nWhether a petition has been presented by a person who has purported to sign it or by someone else or whether an agent who has signed the petition is a duly authorized agent or not are its much matters of inquiry as the question of determination of the names of nominated candidates. This fact can be easily determined by reference to the Returning Officer. That this reasoning of the tribunal is not sound is fully demonstrated by a reference to the next case cited by the learned counsel and decided by the same tribunal presided over by Shri N. S. Lokur.\nIt is thus clear that it is no valid explanation to say that section 82 was omitted from the provisions of section 85 simply on the ground that the Election Commission was absolved from the duty of making elaborate inquiries at the stage when it had to say whether the provisions of sections 81, 83 and 117 had been complied with. From the circumstance that section 82 does not find a place in the provisions of section 85 the conclusion follows that the directions contained in section 82 were not considered to be of such a character as to involve the dismissal of a petition in limine and that the matter was such as could be dealt with by the tribunal under the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure specifically made applicable to the trial of election petitions.\nThe view of the majority was that the mandatory nature of the provisions of section 82 itself contains within it the -consequence of dismissal for non-compliance with its provisions and a separate provision for the dismissal of the petition for non-compliance with its provisions was not necessary and it would have been superfluous. These observations run counter to the scheme of the Act itself as envisaged by section 85. The provisions of sections 81, 83 and 117 are also mandatory and still in section 85 it is provided in specific terms that the Election Commission shall dismiss the petition if it is not in accordance with the provisions of those sections. \n The, tribunal is given a similar power by section 90 (4).\nIt is not necessary to express any final opinion on matters specifically covered by sections 81, 83 and 117 and dealt with by section 85 of the Act but at the same time it is not possible to accept the view that in spite of the provisions of section 85 failure to comply strictly with the provisions of section 82 has, the same consequences as are contained in section 85. In our opinion the determination of the question whether the parties to the petition have been properly impleaded is a matter not for the Election Commission but for the tribunal. Various provisions of the Act referred to above show that the election petition does not necessarily abate or fail by reason of the death of the petitioner or any of the respondents or by their ceasing to take any interest in the trial of the petition once that petition has been referred to the tribunal.", + "expert_2": "On the 26th April, 1952, which was the last date under the law for the presentation of an election petition, Jaswant Singh (respondent No. 1) presented such a petition before the Secretary of the Election Commission at New Delhi challenging the election of the appellant and contesting the order of the Returning Officer rejecting his nomination paper. In the petition he impleaded as respondents, Brahma Sarup, Ram Prashad Poddar and the appellant, Jagan Nath, but he omitted to implead, as required by section 82 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, Baijnath, one of the candidates, whose nomination had been accepted but who had withdrawn his candidature subsequently.\nOn the 26th August, 1952, which was the first date of hearing before the tribunal, the appellant raised a preliminary objection that the omission to implead Baijnath, a duly nominated candidate as a respondent in the petition.- was fatal to its maintainability.\nit was contended before us that the Election Tribunal was not a court of general jurisdiction, that it was established by the Representation of the People Act, 1951, for the special purpose of trying election petitions, that its jurisdiction was derived from the statute upon certain specified terms and conditions precedent contained in the statute itself and that it had no general and inherent powers of an existing court and that being so, if the terms and conditions precedent prescribed by the statute were not complied with, it had no jurisdiction to act. According to the appellant, the scheme of the Act was that no election could be called in question except by an election petition presented in accordance with the provisions of Part VI of the Act (section 80), and it was suggested that unless all the requirements of sections 81, 82, 83 and 117 were complied with, an election could not be questioned and that no subsequent addition or amendment of the petition after the expiry of the 14 days prescribed for presenting a petition was permissible. \nIt was further contended that the provisions of section 82 were explicit and mandatory and admitted of no exceptions and the petition not being in accordance with the provisions of the law, there was no valid petition which the tribunal could proceed to try.\nIt is also well settled that it is a sound principle of natural justice that the success of a candidate who has won at an election should not be lightly interfered with and any petition seeking such interference must strictly conform to the requirements of the law.\nIt is always to be borne in mind that though the election of a successful candidate is not to be lightly interfered with, one of the essentials of that law is also to safeguard the purity of the election process and also to see that people do not get elected by flagrant breaches of that law or by corrupt practices.\nIn cases where the election law does not prescribe the consequence, or does not lay down penalty for non-compliance with certain procedural requirements of that law, the jurisdiction of the tribunal entrusted with the trial of the case is not affected.\nIt is significant that both the Election Commission and the tribunal have been given powers in express terms to dismiss an election petition which does not comply with the requirements of sections 81, 83 or 117, but no such powers are given to dismiss a petition in limine which does not comply with the provisions of section 82.\nProvision has been made in section 90 (1) for any other candidate subject to the provisions of section 119, to have himself impleaded as a party in the case within a prescribed period. This provision indicates that the array of parties as provided by section 82 is not final and conclusive and that defects can be cured. Provisions of sections 110, 115 and 116 of Chapter IV of this Part also support this view. Section,110 provides the procedure for the withdrawal of a petition. It says that any person who might himself have been a party may within 14 days of the publication of the notice of withdrawal in the official gazette apply to be substituted as a petitioner in the place of the party withdrawing it. Section 115 provides that such a person can be substituted as a petitioner on the death of the original petitioner while section 116 provides that if a sole respondent dies or gives notice that he does not wish to oppose the petition or any of the respondents dies or gives such notice and there is no other respondent who is appearing in the petition, the tribunal shall cause notice of such event to be published in the official gazette and thereupon any person who might have been a petitioner may within 14 days of such publication apply to be substituted in the place of such respondent and oppose the petition and shall be entitled to continue the proceedings on such terms as the tribunal may think fit. These provisions suggest that if any proper party is omitted from the lists of respondents, such a defect is not fatal and the tribunal is entitled to deal with it under the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, Order I, rules 9, 10 and 13.\ndecision of the Election Tribunal, Lucknow, presided over by Shri N. S., Lokur in Election Petition No. 287 of 1952 published in the Gazette of India dated 20th December, 1951, Part 11, Section 3, page 1034. \n In that case two persons who had been duly nominated as candidates but who had withdrawn their candidature were not impleaded as respondents as required by section 82 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 It was held that the non-joinder was fatal ,to the petition. It was said that the wording of the Act is peremptory and mandatory and it makes it incumbent on the petitioner to join as respondents all candidates duly nominated and it gives him no option and the failure to do so involves rejection of the petition.\nAs regards the omission of section 82 from the provisions of section 85, it was observed that the Election Commission can at once discover whether the provisions of sections 81, 83 and 117 are complied with but the same cannot be said about the requirements of section 82 and that the Election, Commission will have to hold an inquiry as to who were the candidates duly nominated before determining whether all of them had been joined or not, that this burden of inquiry was not thrown on the Commission but it was left for the determination of the tribunal, and hence it was that section 82 was not included in section 85.\nThere is ample authority for the view that this is merely a directory provision and non-joinder of any party is not a fatal defect and a decree can be passed so far as the parties actually on record are concerned unless the party omitted is a necessary party in the sense that in his absence no relief could be given at all even as regards parties actually on record. \n There is no valid reason for treating the word shall in section 82 in a manner different from the same word used in Order XXXIV, rule 1, Civil Procedure Code.\nFrom the circumstance that section 82 does not find a place in the provisions of section 85 the conclusion follows that the directions contained in section 82 were not considered to be of such a character as to involve the dismissal of a petition in limine and that the matter was such as could be dealt with by the tribunal under the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure specifically made applicable to the trial of election petitions.\nVarious provisions of the Act referred to above show that the election petition does not necessarily abate or fail by reason of the death of the petitioner or any of the respondents or by their ceasing to take any interest in the trial of the petition once that petition has been referred to the tribunal.", + "expert_3": "The appellant Jagan Nath was elected a member of the Delhi State Legislative Assembly from Constituency No. 25 (Roshanara) of the Delhi State. \nThe polling in this constituency took place on the 14th January, 1952\nOn the 26th April, 1952, which was the last date under the law for the presentation of an election petition, Jaswant Singh (respondent No. 1) presented such a petition before the Secretary of the Election Commission at New Delhi challenging the election of the appellant and contesting the order of the Returning Officer rejecting his nomination paper. In the petition he impleaded as respondents, Brahma Sarup, Ram Prashad Poddar and the appellant, Jagan Nath, but he omitted to implead, as required by section 82 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, Baijnath, one of the candidates, whose nomination had been accepted but who had withdrawn his candidature subsequently.\nOn the 14th July, 1952, the Election Commissioner appointed an Election Tribunal comprising respondents 5 to 7. \nThis appointment was published in the Gazette of India on the 26th July, 1952, and the election petition after due publication was referred to the tribunal.\nOn the 26th August, 1952, which was the first date of hearing before the tribunal, the appellant raised a preliminary objection that the omission to implead Baijnath, a duly nominated candidate as a respondent in the petition.- was fatal to its maintainability. The petitioner contended that Baijnath was neither a necessary nor a proper party and that in any event the non-joinder of a party. was not fatal to the petition in view of the provisions of Order 1, rule 9, Civil Procedure Code. In the alternative, it was claimed that if it was considered that he was a necessary or proper party, permission may be given to the petitioner to implead him. The tribunal decided the preliminary point in favour of the petitioner and held that the non-joinder of Baijnath as a respondent was not fatal to the petition.\nOn the finding, however, that Baijnath was a proper party to be impleaded in the case, the tribunal directed that he added as a respondent in the petition and notice of the petition be served on him\nIn the view of the tribunal Baijnath was not a necessary party in the sense that in his absence no effective decision could be given in the case and that being a proper party, there was no obstacle to his being joined as a respondent even after the expiry of the period of limitation prescribed for making the petition. \nThe appellant being dissatisfied with this decision, made an application to the Punjab High Court under articles 226 and 227.of the Constitution of India for the issue of a writ of certiorari quashing the order of the tribunal on the ground that it was without jurisdiction and for an order that the election petition be dismissed as there was no valid petition before the Election Tribunal for trial. This petition was summarily rejected by the High Court on the 27th November, 1952. On a petition presented to this court under article 136 of the Constitution, special leave was granted by this court\nThe general rule is well settled that the statutory requirements of election law must be strictly observed and that an election contest is not an action at law or a suit in equity but is a purely statutory proceeding unknown to the common law and that the court possesses no common law power. It is also well settled that it is a sound principle of natural justice that the success of a candidate who has won at an election should not be lightly interfered with and any petition seeking such interference must strictly conform to the requirements of the law.\nNone of these propositions however have any application if the special law itself confers authority on a tribunal to proceed with a petition in accordance with certain procedure and when it does not state the consequences of non-compliance with certain procedural requirements laid down by it. It is always to be borne in mind that though the election of a successful candidate is not to be lightly interfered with, one of the essentials of that law is also to safeguard the purity of the election process and also to see that people do not get elected by flagrant breaches of that law or by corrupt practices. In cases where the election law does not prescribe the consequence, or does not lay down penalty for non-compliance with certain procedural requirements of that law, the jurisdiction of the tribunal entrusted with the trial of the case is not affected.\nSection 80 provides that no election on shall be called in question except by an election petition presented in accordance with the provisions of this Part. Section 81 provides that an election petition calling in question any election may be presented on one or more of the grounds specified in Sub- sections (1) and (2) of sections 100 and 101 to the Election Commission by any candidate at such election or any- elector in such form and within such time but not earlier than the date of publication of the name or names of the returned candidate or candidates at such election under section 67, as may be prescribed that an election petition shall be deemed to have been presented to the Election Commission (a) when it is delivered to the Secretary to the Commission or to such other officer as may be appointed by the Election Commission in this behalf- \n by the person making the petition, or \n by a person authorized in writing in this behalf by the person making the petition or (b) when it is sent by registered post and is delivered to the Secretary to the Commission or the officer so appointed\nSection 82 provides as follows A petitioner shall join as respondents to his petition all the candidates who were duly nominated at the election other than himself if he was so nominated. Section 83 states that an election petition shall contain a concise statement of the material facts on which the petitioner relies and shall be signed by the petitioner and verified in the manner laid down in the Code of Civil Procedure for the verification of pleadings. It further provides that the petition shall be accompanied by a list signed and verified in like manner setting forth full particulars of any corrupt or illegal practice which the petitioner alleges, including as full a statement as possible of the names of the parties alleged to have committed such corrupt or illegal practice and the date and place of the commission of each such practice\nProvision is also made in the section empowering the tribunal to obtain further particulars by allowing an amendment. Section 84 concerns the relief which a petitioner may claim, and section 85 provides that if the provisions of sections 81, 83 or 117 are not complied with, the Election Commission shall dismiss the petition\nSection 86 provides that if the petition is not dismissed under section 85, the Election Commission shall appoint an election tribunal for the trial of the petition.\nSection 90 prescribes the procedure to be followed by the tribunal. Sub-section (2) of section 90 is in these terms - Subject to the provisions of this Act and of any rules made thereunder, every election petition shall be tried by the tribunal, as nearly as may be, in accordance with the procedure applicable under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, to the trial of suits. Sub-section (4) provides that notwithstanding anything contained in section 85, the tribunal may dismiss an election petition which does not comply with the provisions of sections 81, 83 or 117\nIt is significant that both the Election Commission and the tribunal have been given powers in express terms to dismiss an election petition which does not comply with the requirements of sections 81, 83 or 117, but no such powers are given to dismiss a petition in limine which does not comply with the provisions of section 82. Such a petition can only be dismissed at the conclusion of the trial and on grounds sufficient to dismiss it\nSpecific provisions have been made to ensure that allegations of corrupt practice etc. are not lightly or frivolously made by providing that the petition must be. properly verified and the allegations contained therein stated with a certain amount of definiteness and accuracy and it is an express provision of Part VI itself that the procedure of the tribunal is to be governed by the Code of Civil Procedure and where a petition complies with sections 81, 83 or 117, the Commission is bound to refer the petition to an election tribunal and the tribunal, unless it is of the opinion that the petition is not in accordance with sections 81, 83 or 117, is bound to try it and decide it according to the provisions of law\nProvision has been made in section 90 (1) for any other candidate subject to the provisions of section 119, to have himself impleaded as a party in the case within a prescribed period. This provision indicates that the array of parties as provided by section 82 is not final and conclusive and that defects can be cured. Provisions of sections 110, 115 and 116 of Chapter IV of this Part also support this view\nSection,110 provides the procedure for the withdrawal of a petition. It says that any person who might himself have been a party may within 14 days of the publication of the notice of withdrawal in the official gazette apply to be substituted as a petitioner in the place of the party withdrawing it\nSection 115 provides that such a person can be substituted as a petitioner on the death of the original petitioner while section 116 provides that if a sole respondent dies or gives notice that he does not wish to oppose the petition or any of the respondents dies or gives such notice and there is no other respondent who is appearing in the petition, the tribunal shall cause notice of such event to be published in the official gazette and thereupon any person who might have been a petitioner may within 14 days of such publication apply to be substituted in the place of such respondent and oppose the petition and shall be entitled to continue the proceedings on such terms as the tribunal may think fit.\nThese provisions suggest that if any proper party is omitted from the lists of respondents, such a defect is not fatal and the tribunal is entitled to deal with it under the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, Order I, rules 9, 10 and 13.\nBaijnath was a candidate who had withdrawn his candidature and had not contested the election. \n By reason of his absence or presence having regard to the grounds on which the petition was based no prejudice was likely to result to the respondent No. I because the main ground on which the petition was based was that the petitioners nomination paper had been wrongly rejected. Baijnath did not claim that he had acquired any substantive rights by reason of the failure of the petitioner to implied him within the period prescribed and there is no question of depriving him of any such rights.\nIn our opinion, the tribunal rightly disallowed the preliminary objection.\nIt will be sufficient to say. that we are in entire agreement with those decisions which have held that non- compliance with the provisions of section 82 is not fatal to the petition. The matter has to be determined in accordance with the rules of the Code of Civil Procedure which have Is been made expressly applicable\nThe provisions of section 82 are in terms similar to the provisions of Order XXXIV, rule I of the Code of Civil Procedure. Therein it is provided that all persons having an interest either in the mortgage security or in the right of redemption shall be joined as parties to any suit relating to the mortgage. There is ample authority for the view that this is merely a directory provision and non-joinder of any party is not a fatal defect and a decree can be passed so far as the parties actually on record are concerned unless the party omitted is a necessary party in the sense that in his absence no relief could be given at all even as regards parties actually on record. \n There is no valid reason for treating the word shall in section 82 in a manner different from the same word used in Order XXXIV, rule 1, Civil Procedure Code. It is one of the rules of construction that a provision like this is not mandatory unless non-compliance with it is made penal.\nWhether a petition has been presented by a person who has purported to sign it or by someone else or whether an agent who has signed the petition is a duly authorized agent or not are its much matters of inquiry as the question of determination of the names of nominated candidates. This fact can be easily determined by reference to the Returning Officer\nThat this reasoning of the tribunal is not sound is fully demonstrated by a reference to the next case cited by the learned counsel and decided by the same tribunal presided over by Shri N. S. Lokur. \n In that case the question arose whether the petition was duly verified and whether it was accompanied by all the necessary lists required by section 83 (2). An elaborate inquiry had to be conducted to determine the point whether the petition was typed on blank paper signed by the petitioner or whether it was signed by him or some person authorized on his behalf after it had been typed.\nIt is thus clear that it is no valid explanation to say that section 82 was omitted from the provisions of section 85 simply on the ground that the Election Commission was absolved from the duty of making elaborate inquiries at the stage when it had to say whether the provisions of sections 81, 83 and 117 had been complied with. From the circumstance that section 82 does not find a place in the provisions of section 85 the conclusion follows that the directions contained in section 82 were not considered to be of such a character as to involve the dismissal of a petition in limine and that the matter was such as could be dealt with by the tribunal under the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure specifically made applicable to the trial of election petitions\nThe Bombay Tribunal, presided over by Shri B. D. Nandkarni has taken a contrary view in Election Petition No. 72 of 1952, page 286, Gazette of India Extraordinary, dated the 5th February, 1953. The issue in this case was whether Shri \n C. Patil, was a necessary party and -whether by the omission to implead him the whole petition was bad. The tribunal held that the defect was not fatal\nThe provisions of sections 81, 83 and 117 are also mandatory and still in section 85 it is provided in specific terms that the Election Commission shall dismiss the petition if it is not in accordance with the provisions of those sections. \n The, tribunal is given a similar power by section 90 (4). The member of the tribunal who dissented from the majority view gave cogent and sound reasons for holding that non- joinder of a duly nominated candidate who has withdrawn was not necessarily fatal to the petition\nIt is not necessary to express any final opinion on matters specifically covered by sections 81, 83 and 117 and dealt with by section 85 of the Act but at the same time it is not possible to accept the view that in spite of the provisions of section 85 failure to comply strictly with the provisions of section 82 has, the same consequences as are contained in section 85. In our opinion the determination of the question whether the parties to the petition have been properly impleaded is a matter not for the Election Commission but for the tribunal. Various provisions of the Act referred to above show that the election petition does not necessarily abate or fail by reason of the death of the petitioner or any of the respondents or by their ceasing to take any interest in the trial of the petition once that petition has been referred to the tribunal.", + "expert_4": "This is an appeal by special leave against the decision of the Delhi Election Tribunal, dated the 11th November, 1952, in Election Petition No. 10 of 1952.\nThe appellant Jagan Nath was elected a member of the Delhi State Legislative Assembly from Constituency No. 25 (Roshanara) of the Delhi State.\nOn the 26th April, 1952, which was the last date under the law for the presentation of an election petition, Jaswant Singh (respondent No. 1) presented such a petition before the Secretary of the Election Commission at New Delhi challenging the election of the appellant and contesting the order of the Returning Officer rejecting his nomination paper.\nIn the petition he impleaded as respondents, Brahma Sarup, Ram Prashad Poddar and the appellant, Jagan Nath, but he omitted to implead, as required by section 82 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, Baijnath, one of the candidates, whose nomination had been accepted but who had withdrawn his candidature subsequently.\nthe Election Commissioner appointed an Election Tribunal comprising respondents 5 to 7.\nOn the 26th August, 1952, which was the first date of hearing before the tribunal, the appellant raised a preliminary objection that the omission to implead Baijnath, a duly nominated candidate as a respondent in the petition.- was fatal to its maintainability.\nThe petitioner contended that Baijnath was neither a necessary nor a proper party and that in any event the non-joinder of a party. was not fatal to the petition in view of the provisions of Order 1, rule 9, Civil Procedure Code.\nIn the alternative, it was claimed that if it was considered that he was a necessary or proper party, permission may be given to the petitioner to implead him.\nThe tribunal decided the preliminary point in favour of the petitioner and held that the non-joinder of Baijnath as a respondent was not fatal to the petition.\nOn the finding, however, that Baijnath was a proper party to be impleaded in the case, the tribunal directed that he added as a respondent in the petition and notice of the petition be served on him.\nThe appellant being dissatisfied with this decision, made an application to the Punjab High Court under articles 226 and 227.of the Constitution of India for the issue of a writ of certiorari quashing the order of the tribunal on the ground that it was without jurisdiction and for an order that the election petition be dismissed as there was no valid petition before the Election Tribunal for trial.\nThis petition was summarily rejected by the High Court on the 27th November, 1952.\nIn cases where the election law does not prescribe the consequence, or does not lay down penalty for non-compliance with certain procedural requirements of that law, the jurisdiction of the tribunal entrusted with the trial of the case is not affected.\nPart VI of the Act deals with Disputes regarding Elections.\nSection 80 provides that no election on shall be called in question except by an election petition presented in accordance with the provisions of this Part.\nSection 81 provides that an election petition calling in question any election may be presented on one or more of the grounds specified in Sub- sections (1) and (2) of sections 100 and 101 to the Election Commission by any candidate at such election or any- elector in such form and within such time but not earlier than the date of publication of the name or names of the returned candidate or candidates at such election under section 67, as may be prescribed that an election petition shall be deemed to have been presented to the Election Commission (a) when it is delivered to the Secretary to the Commission or to such other officer as may be appointed by the Election Commission in this behalf- \n by the person making the petition, or \n by a person authorized in writing in this behalf by the person making the petition or (b) when it is sent by registered post and is delivered to the Secretary to the Commission or the officer so appointed.\nSection 82 provides as follows A petitioner shall join as respondents to his petition all the candidates who were duly nominated at the election other than himself if he was so nominated.\nsection 85 provides that if the provisions of sections 81, 83 or 117 are not complied with, the Election Commission shall dismiss the petition.\nPower is however given to the Commission to condone delay in making the petition for sufficient cause.\nSection 86 provides that if the petition is not dismissed under section 85, the Election Commission shall appoint an election tribunal for the trial of the petition.\nSub-section (4) provides that notwithstanding anything contained in section 85, the tribunal may dismiss an election petition which does not comply with the provisions of sections 81, 83 or 117.\nIt is significant that both the Election Commission and the tribunal have been given powers in express terms to dismiss an election petition which does not comply with the requirements of sections 81, 83 or 117, but no such powers are given to dismiss a petition in limine which does not comply with the provisions of section 82.\nSuch a petition can only be dismissed at the conclusion of the trial and on grounds sufficient to dismiss it (section 98).\nProvision has been made in section 90 (1) for any other candidate subject to the provisions of section 119, to have himself impleaded as a party in the case within a prescribed period.\nThis provision indicates that the array of parties as provided by section 82 is not final and conclusive and that defects can be cured.\nProvisions of sections 110, 115 and 116 of Chapter IV of this Part also support this view.\nSection,110 provides the procedure for the withdrawal of a petition. It says that any person who might himself have been a party may within 14 days of the publication of the notice of withdrawal in the official gazette apply to be substituted as a petitioner in the place of the party withdrawing it.\nThese provisions suggest that if any proper party is omitted from the lists of respondents, such a defect is not fatal and the tribunal is entitled to deal with it under the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, Order I, rules 9, 10 and 13.\nBaijnath was a candidate who had withdrawn his candidature and had not contested the election. \n By reason of his absence or presence having regard to the grounds on which the petition was based no prejudice was likely to result to the respondent\nbecause the main ground on which the petition was based was that the petitioners nomination paper had been wrongly rejected.\nBaijnath did not claim that he had acquired any substantive rights by reason of the failure of the petitioner to implied him within the period prescribed and there is no question of depriving him of any such rights.\nIn our opinion, the tribunal rightly disallowed the preliminary objection.\nOn a careful perusal of the different decisions given by the various election tribunals it appears that there is no uniformity of opinion between them on this point.\nIt will be sufficient to say. that we are in entire agreement with those decisions which have held that non- compliance with the provisions of section 82 is not fatal to the petition.\nThe matter has to be determined in accordance with the rules of the Code of Civil Procedure which have Is been made expressly applicable.\nThe provisions of section 82 are in terms similar to the provisions of Order XXXIV, rule I of the Code of Civil Procedure.\nTherein it is provided that all persons having an interest either in the mortgage security or in the right of redemption shall be joined as parties to any suit relating to the mortgage.\nThere is ample authority for the view that this is merely a directory provision and non-joinder of any party is not a fatal defect and a decree can be passed so far as the parties actually on record are concerned unless the party omitted is a necessary party in the sense that in his absence no relief could be given at all even as regards parties actually on record.\nThere is no valid reason for treating the word shall in section 82 in a manner different from the same word used in Order XXXIV, rule 1, Civil Procedure Code.\nIt is one of the rules of construction that a provision like this is not mandatory unless non-compliance with it is made penal.\nIt is thus clear that it is no valid explanation to say that section 82 was omitted from the provisions of section 85 simply on the ground that the Election Commission was absolved from the duty of making elaborate inquiries at the stage when it had to say whether the provisions of sections 81, 83 and 117 had been complied with.\nFrom the circumstance that section 82 does not find a place in the provisions of section 85 the conclusion follows that the directions contained in section 82 were not considered to be of such a character as to involve the dismissal of a petition in limine and that the matter was such as could be dealt with by the tribunal under the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure specifically made applicable to the trial of election petitions.\nElection Petition No. 72 of 1952, page 286, Gazette of India Extraordinary, dated the 5th February, 1953. The issue in this case was whether Shri \n C. Patil, was a necessary party and -whether by the omission to implead him the whole petition was bad.\nThe tribunal held that the defect was not fatal.\nThe provisions of sections 81, 83 and 117 are also mandatory and still in section 85 it is provided in specific terms that the Election Commission shall dismiss the petition if it is not in accordance with the provisions of those sections. \n The, tribunal is given a similar power by section 90 (4).\nThe member of the tribunal who dissented from the majority view gave cogent and sound reasons for holding that non- joinder of a duly nominated candidate who has withdrawn was not necessarily fatal to the petition.\nA Division Bench of the Bombay High Court in Special Civil Appeal No. 2017 of 1952, decided on the 19th of December, 1952, allowed even a defective verification to be amended.\nIt is not necessary to express any final opinion on matters specifically covered by sections 81, 83 and 117 and dealt with by section 85 of the Act but at the same time it is not possible to accept the view that in spite of the provisions of section 85 failure to comply strictly with the provisions of section 82 has, the same consequences as are contained in section 85.\nIn our opinion the determination of the question whether the parties to the petition have been properly impleaded is a matter not for the Election Commission but for the tribunal.\nVarious provisions of the Act referred to above show that the election petition does not necessarily abate or fail by reason of the death of the petitioner or any of the respondents or by their ceasing to take any interest in the trial of the petition once that petition has been referred to the tribunal.", + "expert_5": "though the election of a successful candidate is not to be lightly interfered with, one of the essentials of that law is also to safeguard the purity of the election process and also to see that people do not get elected by flagrant breaches of that law or by corrupt practices.\nIn cases where the election law does not prescribe the consequence, or does not lay down penalty for non-compliance with certain procedural requirements of that law, the jurisdiction of the tribunal entrusted with the trial of the case is not affected.\nSection 82 provides as follows A petitioner shall join as respondents to his petition all the candidates who were duly nominated at the election other than himself if he was so nominated.\nsection 85 provides that if the provisions of sections 81, 83 or 117 are not complied with, the Election Commission shall dismiss the petition.\nSub-section (2) of section 90 is in these terms - Subject to the provisions of this Act and of any rules made thereunder, every election petition shall be tried by the tribunal, as nearly as may be, in accordance with the procedure applicable under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, to the trial of suits.\nSub-section (4) provides that notwithstanding anything contained in section 85, the tribunal may dismiss an election petition which does not comply with the provisions of sections 81, 83 or 117.\nIt is significant that both the Election Commission and the tribunal have been given powers in express terms to dismiss an election petition which does not comply with the requirements of sections 81, 83 or 117, but no such powers are given to dismiss a petition in limine which does not comply with the provisions of section 82. Such a petition can only be dismissed at the conclusion of the trial and on grounds sufficient to dismiss it (section 98).\nit is an express provision of Part VI itself that the procedure of the tribunal is to be governed by the Code of Civil Procedure and where a petition complies with sections 81, 83 or 117, the Commission is bound to refer the petition to an election tribunal and the tribunal, unless it is of the opinion that the petition is not in accordance with sections 81, 83 or 117, is bound to try it and decide it according to the provisions of law.\nProvision has been made in section 90 (1) for any other candidate subject to the provisions of section 119, to have himself impleaded as a party in the case within a prescribed period.\nThis provision indicates that the array of parties as provided by section 82 is not final and conclusive and that defects can be cured.\nProvisions of sections 110, 115 and 116 of Chapter IV of this Part also support this view.\nThese provisions suggest that if any proper party is omitted from the lists of respondents, such a defect is not fatal and the tribunal is entitled to deal with it under the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, Order I, rules 9, 10 and 13.\nBy reason of his absence or presence having regard to the grounds on which the petition was based no prejudice was likely to result to the respondent No.\nI because the main ground on which the petition was based was that the petitioners nomination paper had been wrongly rejected. Baijnath did not claim that he had acquired any substantive rights by reason of the failure of the petitioner to implied him within the period prescribed and there is no question of depriving him of any such rights.\nOn a careful perusal of the different decisions given by the various election tribunals it appears that there is no uniformity of opinion between them on this point. Conflicting opinions have been expressed by these tribunals.\nIt will be sufficient to say. that we are in entire agreement with those decisions which have held that non- compliance with the provisions of section 82 is not fatal to the petition.\nThe matter has to be determined in accordance with the rules of the Code of Civil Procedure which have Is been made expressly applicable.\nThere is ample authority for the view that this is merely a directory provision and non-joinder of any party is not a fatal defect and a decree can be passed so far as the parties actually on record are concerned unless the party omitted is a necessary party in the sense that in his absence no relief could be given at all even as regards parties actually on record. \n There is no valid reason for treating the word shall in section 82 in a manner different from the same word used in Order XXXIV, rule 1, Civil Procedure Code. It is one of the rules of construction that a provision like this is not mandatory unless non-compliance with it is made penal.\nIt is thus clear that it is no valid explanation to say that section 82 was omitted from the provisions of section 85 simply on the ground that the Election Commission was absolved from the duty of making elaborate inquiries at the stage when it had to say whether the provisions of sections 81, 83 and 117 had been complied with.\nFrom the circumstance that section 82 does not find a place in the provisions of section 85 the conclusion follows that the directions contained in section 82 were not considered to be of such a character as to involve the dismissal of a petition in limine and that the matter was such as could be dealt with by the tribunal under the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure specifically made applicable to the trial of election petitions.\nThe Bombay Tribunal, presided over by Shri B. D. Nandkarni has taken a contrary view in Election Petition No. 72 of 1952, page 286, Gazette of India Extraordinary, dated the 5th February, 1953. The issue in this case was whether Shri \n C. Patil, was a necessary party and -whether by the omission to implead him the whole petition was bad. The tribunal held that the defect was not fatal.\nit is not possible to accept the view that in spite of the provisions of section 85 failure to comply strictly with the provisions of section 82 has, the same consequences as are contained in section 85.\nIn our opinion the determination of the question whether the parties to the petition have been properly impleaded is a matter not for the Election Commission but for the tribunal." + }, + "1954_158": { + "expert_1": "This appeal, which has come before us, on a certificate granted by the High Court of Calcutta, under article 133(1) of the Constitution, is directed against a judgment and decree of a Division Bench of that Court dated the 29th March, 1950, affirming, on appeal, those of the Subordinate Judge, Fourth Court, Alipore, passed in Title Suit\nThe appellants before us are the heirs and legal representatives of the original defendant No. 3 in the suit, which was commenced by the plaintiffs respondents to recover possession of the property in dispute, on establishment of their title, as reversionary heirs of one Haripada Patra, after the death of his mother Rashmoni, who got the property in the restricted rights of a Hindu female heir on Haripadas death.\nWhat concerns us in this appeal is the dispute between the plaintiffs on the one hand and defendant No. 3 on the other and this dispute centered. round three points, namely, \n Whether the security bond (Ex. E-1) executed by Rashmoni along with Mohini was executed for legal, necessity and was therefore binding on the reversioners, of Haripada after the death of Rashmoni ? Whether the fact that Mohini, who was the presumptive reversioner at that time, joined with his mother in executing the security bond would make it binding on the -,actual reversioner after the death of Rashmomi? In any event if such consent on the part of the presumptive reversioner raised a presumption of legal necessity, was that presumption rebutted in the present case by the evidence adduced by the parties ? Whether the title of defendant No. I was protected ,he being a stranger purchaser who had purchased the -property from the purchaser at an execution sale after making proper enquiries and obtaining legal advice ? The trial Judge by his judgment dated the 22nd December, 1944, decided all these points in favour of the plaintiffs and decreed the suit. On appeal by the defendant to the High Court, the decision of the trial Judge was affirmed. The heirs of defendant No.3 have now come up to this Court\nOn the first point both the Courts below have held concurrently, that there was absolutely no legal necessity which justified the execution of the security bond by Rashmoni in favour of Suhasini\nThe contentions, though somewhat plausible at first sight, seem to us to be wholly without substance.\nAs was found, on investigation of accounts, under orders of the High Court later on, nothing at all was due to the receiver by the estate of Haripada or Mohini. On the other hand, both the brothers were entitled to get a fairly large sum of money from the receiver.\nIt may be, that it was not possible to know the actual state of affairs with regard to the receivers accounts and consequently it might well have been thought prudent to borrow money to ward off what was considered to be a danger to the estate.\nThe High Court has rightly pointed out that Rashmoni did not execute the bond to raise any money to pay off her share of the deposit and in fact no necessity for raising money for that purpose at all existed at that time.\nIn our opinion the only object of executing the security bond was to protect Mohini who was threatened with legal proceedings by his creditor for having included a nonexistent property in the mortgage bond. Rashmoni certainly acted at the instance of and for the benefit of Mohini and she might have been actuated by a feeling of Maternal affection to save her son from a real or imaginary danger. But by no stretch of imagination could it be regarded as a prudent act on the part of a Hindu female heir which was necessary for the protection of the estate of the last male holder. In our opinion the view taken by the Courts below is quite proper and as a concurrent finding of fact it should not be disturbed by this Court.\nWe do not think that there could be any serious controversy about the law on this point. The alienation here, was by way of mortgage and so no question of surrender could possibly arise. \n Mohini being the immediate reversioner who joined in the execution of the security bond must be deemed to have consented to the transaction. Such consent may raise a presumption that the transaction was for legal necessity or that the mortgagee had acted therein after proper and bona flde enquiry and has satisfied himself as to the existence of such necessity(1). But this. presumption is rebuttable and it is open to the actual reversioner to establish that there was in fact no legal necessity and there has been no proper and bonafide enquiry by the mortgagee. There is no doubt that both the Courts below have proceeded on a correct view of law and both have come to the conclusion upon a consideration of the evidence in the case that the presumption that arose by reason of the then reversioners giving consent to the transaction was rebutted by the facts transpiring in evidence.\nThis deed purports to be addressed to Bangshidari Ghosh and Keshav Dutt, two other alienees of the properties of Mohini and Haripada and does not amount to a representation made to the auction purchaser Annada Prasad Ghose or to the father of the present appellants. In fact they had not come in the picture at all at that time. At the most it can be regarded only as an admission by a presumptive reversioner and cannot have any higher value than the consent expressed by Mohini who figured as a co-execuitant of the security bond. It cannot bind the actual reversioner in any way.\nIt is true that there is a passage at the end of the judgment in Monokarnikas case(1) which lends some apparent support to the contention of the learned counsel.\nit was held that the words referred to above should I not be construed to lay down the proposition that such consent on the part of the father would operate proprio vigore and would be binding on the sons. This proposition, Their Lordships observed, was opposed both to principle and authority, it being a settled doctrine of Hindu law that nobody has a vested right so long as the widow is alive and the eventual reversioner does not claim through anyone who went before him. As the sons of Ram Narayan claim as heirs of Haripada and not of their father, the admissions, if any, made by the latter could not in any way bind them.\nThis contention of the appellant must therefore fail.\nThe third and the last contention raised by Mr. Chatterjee is that in any event his client is a stranger who has bona fide purchased the property for good consideration after making due enquiries and on proper legal advice and be cannot therefore be affected by any infirmity of title by reason of the absence of legal necessity\nIn our opinion the contention formulated in this form really involves a misconception of the legal position of an alienee of a Hindu widows property.\nThe interest of a Hindu widow in the pro- perties inherited by her bears no analogy or resemblance to what may be described as an equitable estate in English law and which cannot be followed in the hands of a bonafide purchaser for value without notice. From very early times the Hindu widows estate has been described as qualified proprietorship with powers of alienation only when there is justifying necessity, and the restrictions on the powers of alienation are inseparable from her estate (2). For legal necessity she can convey to another an absolute title to the property vested in her. If there is no legal necessity, the transferee gets only the widows estate which is not even an (1) 46 I.A. 72 at 83-84. Vide The Collector of Masaulipatam v. Cavaly Venkata, \n M.I.A. 529, indefeasible life estate for it can come to an end not merely on her death but on the happening of other contingencies like re-marriage, adoption, etc. If an alienee from a Hindu widow succeeds in establishing that there was legal necessity for transfer, he is completely protected and it is immaterial that the necessity was brought about by the mismanagement of the limited owner herself. Even if there is no necessity in fact, but it is proved that there was representation of necessity and the alienee after making bona fide enquiries satisfied himself as best as he could that such necessity existed, then as the Privy Council pointed out in Hunooman Persaud Pandays case (1) the actual existence of a legal necessity is not a condition precedent to the validity of the sale.\nThe position therefore is that if there is no necessity in fact or if the alienee could not prove that he made bona fide enquiries and was satisfied about its existence, the transfer is undoubtedly not void but the transferee would get only the widows estate in the property which does not affect in any way the interest of the reversioner.\nIn this case the alienation was by way of mortgage. The finding of both the Courts below is that there was no legal necessity which justified the execution of the security bond. The mortgagee also could not prove that there was representation of the legal necessity and that she satisfied herself by bona fide enquiries that such necessity did exist.\nIn the present case, there is no scope for an argument that there was such representation of legal necessity or that on bona fide enquiry the alienee satisfied herself that there was such a necessity, for as I have already pointed out the security bond itself states that it was in consideration of benefits already received and with a view to induce Suhasini to forbear from proceeding against Mohini, that the bond was being executed. There is no representation in the bond that the alienation was made with a view to securing any benefit to the estate or to avert any danger to the estate or for the purpose of any other legal necessity. Whatever enquiries the appellants may have made (1) 6 M.I.A, would be of no avail to them when the alienation is not binding on the whole estate but only on the womans estate of Rashmoni.\nIn our opinion the view taken by the High Court is quite proper. On this finding the security bond could operate only on the widows estate of Rashmoni and it was that interest alone which passed to the purchase. at the mortgage sale. The subsequent transferee could not claim to have acquired any higher right than what his predecessor had and it is immaterial whether he bona fide paid the purchase money or took proper legal advice.", + "expert_2": "The appellants before us are the heirs and legal representatives of the original defendant No. 3 in the suit, which was commenced by the plaintiffs respondents to recover possession of the property in dispute, on establishment of their title, as reversionary heirs of one Haripada Patra, after the death of his mother Rashmoni, who got the property in the restricted rights of a Hindu female heir on Haripadas death.\nMahendra executed a will by which he made certain religious and charitable dispositions and subject. to them, directed his properties to be divided amongst his infant sons Mohini and Haripada and his grandson Ram Narayan. Ram Narayan was appointed executor under the will. After the death of Mahendra, Ram Narayan applied for probate of the will and probate was obtained by him on the 6th of October, 1904, Ram Narayan entered upon the management of the estate. He developed extravagant and immoral habits and soon ran into debts.\nRashmoni on behalf of her infant sons instituted a suit against the mortgagee and the mortgagor and got a declaration that the mortgage decree could not bind the infants shares in the properties left by their father.\nOn the 14th of August, 1909, one Baroda Kanta Sarkar, Sheristadar of the Court of the District Judge, Alipore, was appointed, with the consent of both parties, receiver of the estate forming the subject-matter of the litigation. The receiver took possession of the properties immediately after this order was made. The -management by the receiver, as it appears, was not at all proper or beneficial to the interest of the two sons of Mahendra.\nThe receiver however went on borrowing large gums of money upon ex-parte orders received from the Court, the ostensible object of which was to pay off the debts due by Ram Narayan which were not at all binding on the plaintiffs. Fearing that the longer the suit continued and the properties remained in the hands of the receiver the more harmful it- would be to the interests of the minors, Rashmoni on behalf of the minors compromised the suit. with Ram Narayan and a Solenama was filed on the 13th June, 1910. The terms of the compromise, in substance, were, that the properties in suit were to be held in divided shares between the three parties and specific allotments were made in favour of each, the properties allotted to the share of Haripada being specified in schedules Gha and Chha attached to the compromise petition. \nIt was further provided that the receiver would be discharged on submitting his final accounts.\nThe High Court directed a full and proper investigation of the accounts of the receiver by a Commissioner and a Vakil of the High Court was appointed for that purpose. The Commissioner after a protracted enquiry submitted his report which was accepted by the High Court. Under the final orders passed by the High Court not only were the plaintiffs held not liable to pay any money to the receiver but the receiver was directed to pay a sum of Rs. 6,708 to the plaintiffs\nRashmoni, together with her son Mohini executed a security bond -(Ex. E-1) on the 1st August, 1911, and it is upon the legal effect of this document that the decision of this case practically depends. By this security bond, which was executed in favour of Suhasini Dasi, the mortgagee in the mortgage bond of Mohini, Rashmoni purported to hypothecate all the properties that she got as heir of Haripada, as additional security for the loan of Rs. 30,000 already advanced to Mohini under the mortgage.\nThe security bond recites that the mortgagee having discovered this fact was about to Institute legal proceedings against the mortgagor and it was primarily to ward off these threatened proceedings and remove any apprehension from the minds of the mortgagee about the sufficiency of the security that this bond was executed.\nSuhasini instituted a suit for enforcing the mortgage and the security bond against Rashmoni and the heirs of Mohini. preliminary decree was passed on compromise in that suit on the 24th September, 1918, and on the 25th July, 1919, the decree was made final. \nThe decree was put into execution and on the 15th September, 1919, along with other properties, the property in dispute was put up to sale and it was purchased by Annada Prasad Ghose for Rs. 13,500.\nthat the security bond executed by Rashmoni not being supported by legal necessity, the sale in execution of the mortgage as well as the subsequent conveyance in favour of Sarat Kumar Das could pass only the right, title and interest of Rashmoni and could not affect the reversionary rights of the plaintiffs.\nWhat concerns us in this appeal is the dispute between the plaintiffs on the one hand and defendant No. 3 on the other and this dispute centered. round three points, namely, \n Whether the security bond (Ex. E-1) executed by Rashmoni along with Mohini was executed for legal, necessity and was therefore binding on the reversioners, of Haripada after the death of Rashmoni ? Whether the fact that Mohini, who was the presumptive reversioner at that time, joined with his mother in executing the security bond would make it binding on the -,actual reversioner after the death of Rashmomi? In any event if such consent on the part of the presumptive reversioner raised a presumption of legal necessity, was that presumption rebutted in the present case by the evidence adduced by the parties ? Whether the title of defendant No. I was protected ,he being a stranger purchaser who had purchased the -property from the purchaser at an execution sale after making proper enquiries and obtaining legal advice ?\nAs was found, on investigation of accounts, under orders of the High Court later on, nothing at all was due to the receiver by the estate of Haripada or Mohini. On the other hand, both the brothers were entitled to get a fairly large sum of money from the receiver. \n The trial Judge found that there was no urgent necessity to borrow money for releasing the estate and in fact it was Mohini who acted in hot haste to execute the mortgage, his only object being to get the properties in his own hands. It may be, that it was not possible to know the actual state of affairs with regard to the receivers accounts and consequently it might well have been thought prudent to borrow money to ward off what was considered to be a danger to the estate.\nBut the most important thing that would require consideration is the state of things actually existing at the time when the security bond was executed. Even if the release of the estate was considered to be desirable, that had been already accomplished by Mohini who borrowed money on his own responsibility. The utmost that could be said was that Rashmoni was bound to reimburse Mohini to the extent that the deposit of money by Mohini had benefited the estate of Haripada. \n The High Court has rightly pointed out that Rashmoni did not execute the bond to raise any money to pay off her share of the deposit and in fact no necessity for raising money for that purpose at all existed at that time.\nIn our opinion the only object of executing the security bond was to protect Mohini who was threatened with legal proceedings by his creditor for having included a nonexistent property in the mortgage bond. Rashmoni certainly acted at the instance of and for the benefit of Mohini and she might have been actuated by a feeling of Maternal affection to save her son from a real or imaginary danger. But by no stretch of imagination could it be regarded as a prudent act on the part of a Hindu female heir which was necessary for the protection of the estate of the last male holder. In our opinion the view taken by the Courts below is quite proper and as a concurrent finding of fact it should not be disturbed by this Court.\nMohini being the immediate reversioner who joined in the execution of the security bond must be deemed to have consented to the transaction. Such consent may raise a presumption that the transaction was for legal necessity or that the mortgagee had acted therein after proper and bona flde enquiry and has satisfied himself as to the existence of such necessity(1). But this. presumption is rebuttable and it is open to the actual reversioner to establish that there was in fact no legal necessity and there has been no proper and bonafide enquiry by the mortgagee. There is no doubt that both the Courts below have proceeded on a correct view of law and both have come to the conclusion upon a consideration of the evidence in the case that the presumption that arose by reason of the then reversioners giving consent to the transaction was rebutted by the facts transpiring in evidence.\nit being a settled doctrine of Hindu law that nobody has a vested right so long as the widow is alive and the eventual reversioner does not claim through anyone who went before him.\nThe interest of a Hindu widow in the pro- perties inherited by her bears no analogy or resemblance to what may be described as an equitable estate in English law and which cannot be followed in the hands of a bonafide purchaser for value without notice. From very early times the Hindu widows estate has been described as qualified proprietorship with powers of alienation only when there is justifying necessity, and the restrictions on the powers of alienation are inseparable from her estate (2). For legal necessity she can convey to another an absolute title to the property vested in her.\nIf an alienee from a Hindu widow succeeds in establishing that there was legal necessity for transfer, he is completely protected and it is immaterial that the necessity was brought about by the mismanagement of the limited owner herself. Even if there is no necessity in fact, but it is proved that there was representation of necessity and the alienee after making bona fide enquiries satisfied himself as best as he could that such necessity existed, then as the Privy Council pointed out in Hunooman Persaud Pandays case (1) the actual existence of a legal necessity is not a condition precedent to the validity of the sale. The position therefore is that if there is no necessity in fact or if the alienee could not prove that he made bona fide enquiries and was satisfied about its existence, the transfer is undoubtedly not void but the transferee would get only the widows estate in the property which does not affect in any way the interest of the reversioner. In this case the alienation was by way of mortgage. The finding of both the Courts below is that there was no legal necessity which justified the execution of the security bond.\nIn the present case, there is no scope for an argument that there was such representation of legal necessity or that on bona fide enquiry the alienee satisfied herself that there was such a necessity, for as I have already pointed out the security bond itself states that it was in consideration of benefits already received and with a view to induce Suhasini to forbear from proceeding against Mohini, that the bond was being executed. There is no representation in the bond that the alienation was made with a view to securing any benefit to the estate or to avert any danger to the estate or for the purpose of any other legal necessity. Whatever enquiries the appellants may have made (1) 6 M.I.A, would be of no avail to them when the alienation is not binding on the whole estate but only on the womans estate of Rashmoni.\nthe security bond could operate only on the widows estate of Rashmoni and it was that interest alone which passed to the purchase. at the mortgage sale.\nThe subsequent transferee could not claim to have acquired any higher right than what his predecessor had and it is immaterial whether he bona fide paid the purchase money or took proper legal advice.", + "expert_3": "The appellants before us are the heirs and legal representatives of the original defendant No. 3 in the suit, which was commenced by the plaintiffs respondents to recover possession of the property in dispute, on establishment of their title, as reversionary heirs of one Haripada Patra, after the death of his mother Rashmoni, who got the property in the restricted rights of a Hindu female heir on Haripadas death\nThe property in suit which is premises No. 6 Dwarik Ghoses Lane situated in the suburb of Calcutta admittedly formed part of the estate of one Mahendra Narayan Patra, a Hindu inhabitant of Bengal, owning considerable properties, who died on the 17th April, 1903, leaving him surviving his widow Rashmoni, two infant sons by her, Mohini Mohan and Haripada and a grandson Ram Narayan by a predeceased son Shyama Charan. Shyama Charan was the son of Mahendra by his first wife, who died during his lifetime. On the 17th February, 1901, Mahendra executed a will by which he made certain religious and charitable dispositions and subject. to them, directed his properties to be divided amongst his infant sons Mohini and Haripada and his grandson Ram Narayan\nRam Narayan was appointed executor under the will. After the death of Mahendra, Ram Narayan applied for probate of the will and probate was obtained by him on the 6th of October, 1904, Ram Narayan entered upon the management of the estate\nHe developed extravagant and immoral habits and soon ran into debts. The bulk of the properties were mortgaged to one Kironsashi who having obtained a decree on the mortgage applied for sale of the mortgaged properties. \nThereupon Rashmoni on behalf of her infant sons instituted a suit against the mortgagee and the mortgagor and got a declaration that the mortgage decree could not bind the infants shares in the properties left by their father\nThis judgment was given on the 31st March, 1909\nOn the 13th August, 1909, the two infant sons of Mahendra to wit Mohini and Haripada, by their mother and next friend Rashmoni, instituted a suit in the Court of the Subordinate Judge at Alipore, being Title Suit No. 45 of 1909, claiming administration of the estate left by Mahendra as well as partition and accounts on the basis of the will left by him. On the 14th of August, 1909, one Baroda Kanta Sarkar, Sheristadar of the Court of the District Judge, Alipore, was appointed, with the consent of both parties, receiver of the estate forming the subject-matter of the litigation. The receiver took possession of the properties immediately after this order was made. The -management by the receiver, as it appears, was not at all proper or beneficial to the interest of the two sons of Mahendra\nMahendra himself left no debts and whatever debts were contracted,, were contracted by Ram Narayan to meet his own immoral and extravagant expenses\nThe receiver however went on borrowing large gums of money upon ex-parte orders received from the Court, the ostensible object of which was to pay off the debts due by Ram Narayan which were not at all binding on the plaintiffs. Fearing that the longer the suit continued and the properties remained in the hands of the receiver the more harmful it- would be to the interests of the minors, Rashmoni on behalf of the minors compromised the suit. with Ram Narayan and a Solenama was filed on the 13th June, 1910. The terms of the compromise, in substance, were, that the properties in suit were to be held in divided shares between the three parties and specific allotments were made in favour of each, the properties allotted to the share of Haripada being specified in schedules Gha and Chha attached to the compromise petition. \nIt was further provided that the receiver would be discharged on submitting his final accounts\nIt may be mentioned here that the property which is the subject-matter of the present suit was, under the Solenama, allotted to the share of Haripada\nThe Court made an order directing the receiver to submit his final accounts within one month, or as early as possible, when the - necessary order for discharge would be made. It was further directed that as the suit was disposed of on compromise the receiver should discontinue collecting rents and profits due to the estate from that day. This order however was modified by a subsequent order made on 23rd June, 19 10, which directed that the receiver was to continue in possession of the estate until he was paid whatever was due to him for his ordinary commission and allowances and until the parties deposited in Court the amounts borrowed by the receiver under orders of the Court or in the alternative gave sufficient indemnity for the same.\nAfter this, Rashmoni on behalf of her minor sons filed two successive applications before the Subordinate Judge praying for permission to raise by mortgage, of a part of the estate, the moneys necessary for releasing the estate from the hands of the receiver. \nThe first application was rejected and the second was granted, after it was brought to the notice of the Subordinate Judge that the receiver was attempting to dissuade prospective lenders who were approached on behalf of Rashmoni, to lend any money to her.\nOn the 16th of January, 191 1, Haripada, the younger son of Rashmoni, died and his interest devolved upon his mother as his heir under the Hindu law. On the 28th January, 1911, the following order was recorded by the Suborainate Judge The receiver has filed a statement showing the amount as due to him up to the end of the. current month. This claim amounts to Rs. 20,950-2-6 pies only\nThe parties may deposit the sum on or before the 1st February next in Court and on such deposit the receiver will be discharged and the possession of the estate of late Mahendr Narayan Patra, will be made over to the parties. On the very same day Mohini exectued a mortgage\nM-1) in favour of one Suhasini Dasi by which he hypothecated the properties allotted to his share and also his future interest as reversions to the share of Haripada, to secure an advance of Rs. 30,000. The loan was to carry interest at the rate of 18 per annum. One thing may be mentioned in connection with this mortgage, and that is, that amongst the properties included in the mortgage were two properties, namely, premises No. 15/1 and 16 Chetlahat Road, which had already been sold and to which the mortgagor bad no title at the date of the mortgage\nOn the 1st February, 1911, Mohini deposited in Court the sum of Rs. 2,0,950-2-6 pies, being the amount alleged to. be due to the receiver and the Court by an order passed on that date directed the release of the estate from the hands of the receiver. After the estate was released a petition was filed on behalf of the plaintiffs on the 15th February, 1911, praying that the loans said to be contracted by the receiver should not be paid out of the money deposited in Court, as these borrowings were made not for the protection of the estate but only for the personal benefit of the defendant, Ram Narayan, and to pay off his creditors.\nIt was contended that the loans raised by the receiver were not raised in good faith, after proper notice to the plaintiffs but on the strength of orders which he obtained ex-parte from the Subordinate Judge without disclosing the material facts. This application. was rejected by the Court on the 23rd February,1911. After this order was made,the plaintiffs put in a petition praying that payment of the moneys, due to the creditor- with the exception of what was necessary to pay off one of the creditors, named Rakhal Das Adhya, be stayed till the following Monday as the plaintiffs wanted to move the High Court against the order of the Subordinate Judge mentioned above.\nThe Court granted this prayer and on the 2nd of March following, orders were received from the High Court directing that the moneys were to be detained in Court pending further orders\nThe High Court made order on the plaintiff s petition on the 29th May, 1911. The learned Judges were very critical of the appointment of the Sheristadar of the Court as receiver of the estate and in no measured terms blamed the Subordinate Judge for passing ex-parte, orders for raising loans on the applications of the receiver without any investigation at all and the receiver also for borrowing money not for the benefit of the estate but for the personal benefit of Ram Narayan, the defendant. \nThe High Court directed a full and proper investigation of the accounts of the receiver by a Commissioner and a Vakil of the High Court was appointed for that purpose. The Commissioner after a protracted enquiry submitted his report which was accepted by the High Court\nUnder the final orders passed by the High Court not only were the plaintiffs held not liable to pay any money to the receiver but the receiver was directed to pay a sum of Rs. 6,708 to the plaintiffs.\nThe plaintiffs were also to-receive Rs. 4,084 from the defendant, Ram Narayan. The defendant was to pay Rs. 19,124 to the receiver and the receiver wag made personally liable for the loans that he had incurred. This order was made on the 23rd July, 1913\nIn the meantime while the investigation of accounts were going on under orders of the High Court, Rashmoni, together with her son Mohini executed a security bond -(Ex. E-1) on the 1st August, 1911, and it is upon the legal effect of this document that the decision of this case practically depends\nBy this security bond, which was executed in favour of Suhasini Dasi, the mortgagee in the mortgage bond of Mohini, Rashmoni purported to hypothecate all the properties that she got as heir of Haripada, as additional security for the loan of Rs. 30,000 already advanced to Mohini under the mortgage. As is stated already, two properties situated at Chetla were included in the mortgage of Mohini although they were already sold. The security bond recites that the mortgagee having discovered this fact was about to Institute legal proceedings against the mortgagor and it was primarily to ward off these threatened proceedings and remove any apprehension from the minds of the mortgagee about the sufficiency of the security that this bond was executed.\nIt is further stated in the bond that the estate of Haripada in the hands of his mother was benefited by the deposit of Rs. 20,950 in Court by Mohini Mohan out of the sum of Rs. 30,000 borrowed on the mortgage and that Mohini had spent the remaining amount of the loan towards clearing certain debts of Rashmoni herself and to meet the litigation and other expenses of both of them\nMohini died soon after on the 8th of November, 1911. On October 13, 1917, Suhasini instituted a suit for enforcing the mortgage and the security bond against Rashmoni and the heirs of Mohini. preliminary decree was passed on compromise in that suit on the 24th September, 1918, and on the 25th July, 1919, the decree was made final. \nThe decree was put into execution and on the 15th September, 1919, along with other properties, the property in dispute was put up to sale and it was purchased by Annada Prasad Ghose for Rs. 13,500. On the 14th November, 1919, Bhubaneswari, wife of Ram Narayan, as guardian of her infant sons filed a suit, being Title Suit No. 254 of 1919 against Suhasini, Rashmoni and Annada attacking the validity of the mortgage decree obtained by Suhasini as well as the sale in execution thereof.\nThe suit ended on the 6th July, 1921, and the plaintiff gave up her claim\nOn September 5, 1922, Annada Ghose borrowed a sum of Rs. 10,000 from Sarat Kumar Das, the original defendant No. 3 in, the suit and the father of the present appellants and by way of equitable mortgage deposited with the lender the title deeds of the property No. 6, Dwarik Ghose Lane. On the 14th September, 1925, Annada sold the property by executing a conveyance in favour of the mortgagee Sarat Kumar Das for a consideration of Rs. 15,500. On the 8th June, 1939, Rashmoni died\nAbout a year later on July 15, 1940, the three sons of Ram Narayan, who are the reversionary heirs of Haripada after the death of Rashmoni, commenced the present suit in the Court of the Subordinate Judge at Alipore claiming to recover possession of the property on the allegation, that the security bond executed by Rashmoni not being supported by legal necessity, the sale in execution of the mortgage as well as the subsequent conveyance in favour of Sarat Kumar Das could pass only the right, title and interest of Rashmoni and could not affect the reversionary rights of the plaintiffs\nWhat concerns us in this appeal is the dispute between the plaintiffs on the one hand and defendant No. 3 on the other and this dispute centered. round three points, namely, \n Whether the security bond (Ex. E-1) executed by Rashmoni along with Mohini was executed for legal, necessity and was therefore binding on the reversioners, of Haripada after the death of Rashmoni ? Whether the fact that Mohini, who was the presumptive reversioner at that time, joined with his mother in executing the security bond would make it binding on the -,actual reversioner after the death of Rashmomi?\nIn any event if such consent on the part of the presumptive reversioner raised a presumption of legal necessity, was that presumption rebutted in the present case by the evidence adduced by the parties ? Whether the title of defendant No. I was protected ,he being a stranger purchaser who had purchased the -property from the purchaser at an execution sale after making proper enquiries and obtaining legal advice\nThe trial Judge by his judgment dated the 22nd December, 1944, decided all these points in favour of the plaintiffs and decreed the suit. On appeal by the defendant to the High Court, the decision of the trial Judge was affirmed.\nThe heirs of defendant No.3 have now come up\nOn the first point both the Courts below have held concurrently, that there was absolutely no legal necessity which justified the execution of the security bond by Rashmoni in favour of Suhasini.\nIt is true that because of the unfortunate death of Haripada only a few days before, Rashmoni could not join in executing the mortgage but she, as heir of Haripada, was really answerable for half of the money that was required to be deposited in Court. It is said that this was not a mere moral obligation but a legal liability on the part of the lady, as Mohini could have claimed contribution from her to the extent that Haripadas estate was benefited by the deposit. The execution of the security bond therefore was an act beneficial to the estate of Haripada. The contentions, though somewhat plausible at first sight, seem to us to be wholly without substance\nIn the first place the money borrowed by Mohini or deposited by him in Court did not and could not benefit Haripadas estate at all\nAs was found, on investigation of accounts, under orders of the High Court later on, nothing at all was due to the receiver by the estate of Haripada or Mohini. On the other hand, both the brothers were entitled to get a fairly large sum of money from the receiver. \n The trial Judge found that there was no urgent necessity to borrow money for releasing the estate and in fact it was Mohini who acted in hot haste to execute the mortgage, his only object being to get the properties in his own hands. It may be, that it was not possible to know the actual state of affairs with regard to the receivers accounts and consequently it might well have been thought prudent to borrow money to ward off what was considered to be a danger to the estate\nThis might furnish some excuse or explanation for Mohinis borrowing money on the 28th January, 191 1, but that could not make the act of Rashmoni in executing the security bond, seven months after that event, an act of prudent management on her part dictated either by legal necessity or considerations of benefit to the estate of her deceased son In the first place it is to be noted-that the total amount borrowed by Mohini was Rs. 30,000 out of which Rs. 20,950 only were required to be deposited in Court\nThe recital in the security bond that the rest of the money was spent by, Mohini to pay off certain debts of Rashmoni herself and also to meet the litigation and household expenses of both of them has been held by the Subordinate Judge to be false. It has been found on facts that Rashmoni had no occasion to incur any debts either for litigation expenses or for any other purpose. But the most important thing that would require consideration is the state of things actually existing at the time when the security bond was executed. Even if the release of the estate was considered to be desirable, that had been already accomplished by Mohini who borrowed money on his own responsibility.\nThe utmost that could be said was that Rashmoni was bound to reimburse Mohini to the extent that the deposit of money by Mohini had benefited the estate of Haripada\nThe High Court has rightly pointed out that Rashmoni did not execute the bond to raise any money to pay off her share of the deposit and in fact no necessity for raising money for that purpose at all existed at that time.\nAs has been mentioned already, by an order passed by the High Court on the revision petition of Mohini and his mother against the order of the Subordinate Judge dated the 23rd February, 191 1, the whole amount of money deposited in Court on the 1st, February, 191 1, with the exception of a small sum that was paid to a creditor, with the consent of both parties, was detained in Court. The High Court dispos- ed of the revision case on 29th May, 1611, and directed investigation into the accounts of the receiver by a Commissioner appointed by it. As said already, the Court passed severe strictures on the conduct of the receiver as well as of the Subordinate Judge and plainly indicated that the moneys borrowed by the receiver were borrowed not for the benefit of the plaintiffs at all\nUndoubtedly the accounts were still to be investigated but what necessity there possibly could be for Rashmoni to execute, after the High Court had made the order as stated above, a security bond by which she mortgaged all the properties that were allotted to Haripada in his share as an additional security for the entire loan of Rs. 30,000 no portion of which be defied the estate of Haripada at all? In our opinion the only object of executing the security bond was to protect Mohini who was threatened with legal proceedings by his creditor for having included a nonexistent property in the mortgage bond\nRashmoni certainly acted at the instance of and for the benefit of Mohini and she might have been actuated by a feeling of Maternal affection to save her son from a real or imaginary danger. But by no stretch of imagination could it be regarded as a prudent act on the part of a Hindu female heir which was necessary for the protection of the estate of the last male holder. In our opinion the view taken by the Courts below is quite proper and as a concurrent finding of fact it should not be disturbed by this Court.\nThe alienation here, was by way of mortgage and so no question of surrender could possibly arise. \n Mohini being the immediate reversioner who joined in the execution of the security bond must be deemed to have consented to the transaction. Such consent may raise a presumption that the transaction was for legal necessity or that the mortgagee had acted therein after proper and bona flde enquiry and has satisfied himself as to the existence of such necessity(1). But this. presumption is rebuttable and it is open to the actual reversioner to establish that there was in fact no legal necessity and there has been no proper and bonafide enquiry by the mortgagee\nThere is no doubt that both the Courts below have proceeded on a correct view of law and both have come to the conclusion upon a consideration of the evidence in the case that the presumption that arose by reason of the then reversioners giving consent to the transaction was rebutted by the facts transpiring in evidence\nChatterjee placed considerable reliance upon another document which purports to be a deed of declaration and was executed by Ram Narayan on the 5th of October, 1918. At this time Mohini was dead and Ram Narayan was the immediate reversioner to the estate of Haripada and by this deed he declared inter alia that the debts contracted by Rashmoni were for proper and legal necessity\nThis deed purports to be addressed to Bangshidari Ghosh and Keshav Dutt, two other alienees of the properties of Mohini and Haripada and does not amount to a representation made to the auction purchaser Annada Prasad Ghose or to the father of the present appellants. In fact they had not come in the picture at all at that time. At the most it can be regarded only as an admission by a presumptive reversioner and cannot have any higher value than the consent expressed by Mohini who figured as a co-execuitant of the security bond\nIt cannot bind the actual reversioner in any way\nIt is true that there is a passage at the end of the judgment in Monokarnikas case(1) which lends some apparent support to the contention of the learned counsel\nit was held that the words referred to above should I not be construed to lay down the proposition that such consent on the part of the father would operate proprio vigore and would be binding on the sons. This proposition, Their Lordships observed, was opposed both to principle and authority, it being a settled doctrine of Hindu law that nobody has a vested right so long as the widow is alive and the eventual reversioner does not claim through anyone who went before him.\nAs the sons of Ram Narayan claim as heirs of Haripada and not of their father, the admissions, if any, made by the latter could not in any way bind them.\nIn our opinion the contention formulated in this form really involves a misconception of the legal position of an alienee of a Hindu widows property. The interest of a Hindu widow in the pro- perties inherited by her bears no analogy or resemblance to what may be described as an equitable estate in English law and which cannot be followed in the hands of a bonafide purchaser for value without notice. From very early times the Hindu widows estate has been described as qualified proprietorship with powers of alienation only when there is justifying necessity, and the restrictions on the powers of alienation are inseparable from her estate (2). For legal necessity she can convey to another an absolute title to the property vested in her. If there is no legal necessity, the transferee gets only the widows estate which is not even an\nindefeasible life estate for it can come to an end not merely on her death but on the happening of other contingencies like re-marriage, adoption, etc. If an alienee from a Hindu widow succeeds in establishing that there was legal necessity for transfer, he is completely protected and it is immaterial that the necessity was brought about by the mismanagement of the limited owner herself. Even if there is no necessity in fact, but it is proved that there was representation of necessity and the alienee after making bona fide enquiries satisfied himself as best as he could that such necessity existed, then as the Privy Council pointed out in Hunooman Persaud Pandays case (1) the actual existence of a legal necessity is not a condition precedent to the validity of the sale. The position therefore is that if there is no necessity in fact or if the alienee could not prove that he made bona fide enquiries and was satisfied about its existence, the transfer is undoubtedly not void but the transferee would get only the widows estate in the property which does not affect in any way the interest of the reversioner\nIn this case the alienation was by way of mortgage.\nThe finding of both the Courts below is that there was no legal necessity which justified the execution of the security bond. The mortgagee also could not prove that there was representation of the legal necessity and that she satisfied herself by bona fide enquiries that such necessity did exist. On this point the, finding recorded by the High Court is as follows \n In the present case, there is no scope for an argument that there was such representation of legal necessity or that on bona fide enquiry the alienee satisfied herself that there was such a necessity, for as I have already pointed out the security bond itself states that it was in consideration of benefits already received and with a view to induce Suhasini to forbear from proceeding against Mohini, that the bond was being executed. There is no representation in the bond that the alienation was made with a view to securing any benefit to the estate or to avert any danger to the estate or for the purpose of any other legal necessity\nWhatever enquiries the appellants may have made (1) 6 M.I.A, would be of no avail to them when the alienation is not binding on the whole estate but only on the womans estate of Rashmoni\nOn this finding the security bond could operate only on the widows estate of Rashmoni and it was that interest alone which passed to the purchase. at the mortgage sale. The subsequent transferee could not claim to have acquired any higher right than what his predecessor had and it is immaterial whether he bona fide paid the purchase money or took proper legal advice.", + "expert_4": "The appellants before us are the heirs and legal representatives of the original defendant No. 3 in the suit, which was commenced by the plaintiffs respondents to recover possession of the property in dispute, on establishment of their title, as reversionary heirs of one Haripada Patra, after the death of his mother Rashmoni, who got the property in the restricted rights of a Hindu female heir on Haripadas death.\nThe property in suit which is premises No. 6 Dwarik Ghoses Lane situated in the suburb of Calcutta admittedly formed part of the estate of one Mahendra Narayan Patra, a Hindu inhabitant of Bengal, owning considerable properties, who died on the 17th April, 1903, leaving him surviving his widow Rashmoni, two infant sons by her, Mohini Mohan and Haripada and a grandson Ram Narayan by a predeceased son Shyama Charan.\nMahendra executed a will by which he made certain religious and charitable dispositions and subject. to them, directed his properties to be divided amongst his infant sons Mohini and Haripada and his grandson Ram Narayan. Ram Narayan was appointed executor under the will.\nAfter the death of Mahendra, Ram Narayan applied for probate of the will and probate was obtained by him on the 6th of October, 1904, Ram Narayan entered upon the management of the estate.\nHe developed extravagant and immoral habits and soon ran into debts.\nThe bulk of the properties were mortgaged to one Kironsashi who having obtained a decree on the mortgage applied for sale of the mortgaged properties.\nThereupon Rashmoni on behalf of her infant sons instituted a suit against the mortgagee and the mortgagor and got a declaration that the mortgage decree could not bind the infants shares in the properties left by their father.\nOn the 13th August, 1909, the two infant sons of Mahendra to wit Mohini and Haripada, by their mother and next friend Rashmoni, instituted a suit in the Court of the Subordinate Judge at Alipore, being Title Suit No. 45 of 1909, claiming administration of the estate left by Mahendra as well as partition and accounts on the basis of the will left by him.\nThe -management by the receiver, as it appears, was not at all proper or beneficial to the interest of the two sons of Mahendra.\nThe receiver however went on borrowing large gums of money upon ex-parte orders received from the Court, the ostensible object of which was to pay off the debts due by Ram Narayan which were not at all binding on the plaintiffs.\nRashmoni on behalf of the minors compromised the suit. with Ram Narayan and a Solenama was filed on the 13th June, 1910.\nThe terms of the compromise, in substance, were, that the properties in suit were to be held in divided shares between the three parties and specific allotments were made in favour of each, the properties allotted to the share of Haripada being specified in schedules Gha and Chha attached to the compromise petition. \nIt was further provided that the receiver would be discharged on submitting his final accounts.\nIt may be mentioned here that the property which is the subject-matter of the present suit was, under the Solenama, allotted to the share of Haripada.\nOn the very day that the compromise was filed, Rashmoni applied for discharge of the receiver.\nRashmoni on behalf of her minor sons filed two successive applications before the Subordinate Judge praying for permission to raise by mortgage, of a part of the estate, the moneys necessary for releasing the estate from the hands of the receiver.\nThe first application was rejected and the second was granted, after it was brought to the notice of the Subordinate Judge that the receiver was attempting to dissuade prospective lenders who were approached on behalf of Rashmoni, to lend any money to her.\nOn the 16th of January, 191 1, Haripada, the younger son of Rashmoni, died and his interest devolved upon his mother as his heir under the Hindu law.\nOn the very same day Mohini exectued a mortgage (Ex. M-1) in favour of one Suhasini Dasi by which he hypothecated the properties allotted to his share and also his future interest as reversions to the share of Haripada, to secure an advance of Rs. 30,000. The loan was to carry interest at the rate of 18 per annum.\nOne thing may be mentioned in connection with this mortgage, and that is, that amongst the properties included in the mortgage were two properties, namely, premises No. 15/1 and 16 Chetlahat Road, which had already been sold and to which the mortgagor bad no title at the date of the mortgage.\nOn the 1st February, 1911, Mohini deposited in Court the sum of Rs. 2,0,950-2-6 pies, being the amount alleged to. be due to the receiver and the Court by an order passed on that date directed the release of the estate from the hands of the receiver.\nAfter the estate was released a petition was filed on behalf of the plaintiffs on the 15th February, 1911, praying that the loans said to be contracted by the receiver should not be paid out of the money deposited in Court, as these borrowings were made not for the protection of the estate but only for the personal benefit of the defendant, Ram Narayan, and to pay off his creditors.\nThis application. was rejected by the Court on the 23rd February,1911.\nThe learned Judges were very critical of the appointment of the Sheristadar of the Court as receiver of the estate and in no measured terms blamed the Subordinate Judge for passing ex-parte, orders for raising loans on the applications of the receiver without any investigation at all and the receiver also for borrowing money not for the benefit of the estate but for the personal benefit of Ram Narayan, the defendant.\nThe High Court directed a full and proper investigation of the accounts of the receiver by a Commissioner and a Vakil of the High Court was appointed for that purpose.\nThe Commissioner after a protracted enquiry submitted his report which was accepted by the High Court.\nUnder the final orders passed by the High Court not only were the plaintiffs held not liable to pay any money to the receiver but the receiver was directed to pay a sum of Rs. 6,708 to the plaintiffs.\nThe plaintiffs were also to-receive Rs. 4,084 from the defendant, Ram Narayan. The defendant was to pay Rs. 19,124 to the receiver and the receiver wag made personally liable for the loans that he had incurred.\nIn the meantime while the investigation of accounts were going on under orders of the High Court, Rashmoni, together with her son Mohini executed a security bond -(Ex. E-1) on the 1st August, 1911, and it is upon the legal effect of this document that the decision of this case practically depends.\nBy this security bond, which was executed in favour of Suhasini Dasi, the mortgagee in the mortgage bond of Mohini, Rashmoni purported to hypothecate all the properties that she got as heir of Haripada, as additional security for the loan of Rs. 30,000 already advanced to Mohini under the mortgage.\ntwo properties situated at Chetla were included in the mortgage of Mohini although they were already sold.\nIt is further stated in the bond that the estate of Haripada in the hands of his mother was benefited by the deposit of Rs. 20,950 in Court by Mohini Mohan out of the sum of Rs. 30,000 borrowed on the mortgage and that Mohini had spent the remaining amount of the loan towards clearing certain debts of Rashmoni herself and to meet the litigation and other expenses of both of them. Mohini died soon after on the 8th of November, 1911.\nOn October 13, 1917, Suhasini instituted a suit for enforcing the mortgage and the security bond against Rashmoni and the heirs of Mohini. preliminary decree was passed on compromise in that suit on the 24th September, 1918, and on the 25th July, 1919, the decree was made final.\nOn the 8th June, 1939, Rashmoni died.\nAbout a year later on July 15, 1940, the three sons of Ram Narayan, who are the reversionary heirs of Haripada after the death of Rashmoni, commenced the present suit in the Court of the Subordinate Judge at Alipore claiming to recover possession of the property on the allegation, that the security bond executed by Rashmoni not being supported by legal necessity, the sale in execution of the mortgage as well as the subsequent conveyance in favour of Sarat Kumar Das could pass only the right, title and interest of Rashmoni and could not affect the reversionary rights of the plaintiffs.\nWhat concerns us in this appeal is the dispute between the plaintiffs on the one hand and defendant No. 3 on the other and this dispute centered. round three points, namely, \n Whether the security bond (Ex. E-1) executed by Rashmoni along with Mohini was executed for legal, necessity and was therefore binding on the reversioners, of Haripada after the death of Rashmoni ?\nWhether the fact that Mohini, who was the presumptive reversioner at that time, joined with his mother in executing the security bond would make it binding on the -,actual reversioner after the death of Rashmomi?\nIn any event if such consent on the part of the presumptive reversioner raised a presumption of legal necessity, was that presumption rebutted in the present case by the evidence adduced by the parties ?\nWhether the title of defendant No. I was protected ,he being a stranger purchaser who had purchased the -property from the purchaser at an execution sale after making proper enquiries and obtaining legal advice ?\nThe trial Judge by his judgment dated the 22nd December, 1944, decided all these points in favour of the plaintiffs and decreed the suit. On appeal by the defendant to the High Court, the decision of the trial Judge was affirmed.\nThe heirs of defendant No.3 have now come up to this Court and Mr. Chatterjee appearing in support of the appeal has reiterated all the three points which were urged on behalf of his clients in the Courts below.\nOn the first point both the Courts below have held concurrently, that there was absolutely no legal necessity which justified the execution of the security bond by Rashmoni in favour of Suhasini.\nIn the first place the money borrowed by Mohini or deposited by him in Court did not and could not benefit Haripadas estate at all.\nAs was found, on investigation of accounts, under orders of the High Court later on, nothing at all was due to the receiver by the estate of Haripada or Mohini.\nOn the other hand, both the brothers were entitled to get a fairly large sum of money from the receiver.\nThe trial Judge found that there was no urgent necessity to borrow money for releasing the estate and in fact it was Mohini who acted in hot haste to execute the mortgage, his only object being to get the properties in his own hands.\nThe recital in the security bond that the rest of the money was spent by, Mohini to pay off certain debts of Rashmoni herself and also to meet the litigation and household expenses of both of them has been held by the Subordinate Judge to be false.\nThe High Court has rightly pointed out that Rashmoni did not execute the bond to raise any money to pay off her share of the deposit and in fact no necessity for raising money for that purpose at all existed at that time.\nUndoubtedly the accounts were still to be investigated but what necessity there possibly could be for Rashmoni to execute, after the High Court had made the order as stated above, a security bond by which she mortgaged all the properties that were allotted to Haripada in his share as an additional security for the entire loan of Rs. 30,000 no portion of which be defied the estate of Haripada at all?\nIn our opinion the only object of executing the security bond was to protect Mohini who was threatened with legal proceedings by his creditor for having included a nonexistent property in the mortgage bond.\nRashmoni certainly acted at the instance of and for the benefit of Mohini and she might have been actuated by a feeling of Maternal affection to save her son from a real or imaginary danger.\nBut by no stretch of imagination could it be regarded as a prudent act on the part of a Hindu female heir which was necessary for the protection of the estate of the last male holder. In our opinion the view taken by the Courts below is quite proper and as a concurrent finding of fact it should not be disturbed by this Court.\nThe second point urged by Mr. Chatterjee raises the question as to whether the fact of Mohinis joining his mother in executing the security bond would make the transaction binding on the actual reversioner, Mohini being admittedly the presumptive reversioner of Haripada at the date of the transaction.\nThe alienation here, was by way of mortgage and so no question of surrender could possibly arise.\nThere is no doubt that both the Courts below have proceeded on a correct view of law and both have come to the conclusion upon a consideration of the evidence in the case that the presumption that arose by reason of the then reversioners giving consent to the transaction was rebutted by the facts transpiring in evidence.\nMr. Chatterjee placed considerable reliance upon another document which purports to be a deed of declaration and was executed by Ram Narayan on the 5th of October, 1918.\nAt this time Mohini was dead and Ram Narayan was the immediate reversioner to the estate of Haripada and by this deed he declared inter alia that the debts contracted by Rashmoni were for proper and legal necessity.\nThis deed purports to be addressed to Bangshidari Ghosh and Keshav Dutt, two other alienees of the properties of Mohini and Haripada and does not amount to a representation made to the auction purchaser Annada Prasad Ghose or to the father of the present appellants.\nAt the most it can be regarded only as an admission by a presumptive reversioner and cannot have any higher value than the consent expressed by Mohini who figured as a co-execuitant of the security bond.\nIt cannot bind the actual reversioner in any way.\nMr. Chatterjee attempted to put forward an argument on the authority of certain observations in the case of Bajrangi v. Monokarnika(2) that as the present appellants are the sons of Ram Narayan the admissions made by their father would bind them as well.\nthe true import of this passage was discussed by the Privy Council in their later pronouncement in Rangasami Gounden v. Nachippa Gounden(1) and it was held that the words referred to above should I not be construed to lay down the proposition that such consent on the part of the father would operate proprio vigore and would be binding on the sons.\nThis proposition, Their Lordships observed, was opposed both to principle and authority, it being a settled doctrine of Hindu law that nobody has a vested right so long as the widow is alive and the eventual reversioner does not claim through anyone who went before him.\nAs the sons of Ram Narayan claim as heirs of Haripada and not of their father, the admissions, if any, made by the latter could not in any way bind them. This contention of the appellant must therefore fail.\nThe third and the last contention raised by Mr. Chatterjee is that in any event his client is a stranger who has bona fide purchased the property for good consideration after making due enquiries and on proper legal advice and be cannot therefore be affected by any infirmity of title by reason of the absence of legal necessity.\nIn our opinion the contention formulated in this form really involves a misconception of the legal position of an alienee of a Hindu widows property. The interest of a Hindu widow in the pro- perties inherited by her bears no analogy or resemblance to what may be described as an equitable estate in English law and which cannot be followed in the hands of a bonafide purchaser for value without notice.\nFrom very early times the Hindu widows estate has been described as qualified proprietorship with powers of alienation only when there is justifying necessity, and the restrictions on the powers of alienation are inseparable from her estate (2).\nFor legal necessity she can convey to another an absolute title to the property vested in her.\nIf there is no legal necessity, the transferee gets only the widows estate which is not even an (1) 46 I.A. 72 at 83-84. Vide The Collector of Masaulipatam v. Cavaly Venkata, \n M.I.A. 529, indefeasible life estate for it can come to an end not merely on her death but on the happening of other contingencies like re-marriage, adoption, etc.\nIf an alienee from a Hindu widow succeeds in establishing that there was legal necessity for transfer, he is completely protected and it is immaterial that the necessity was brought about by the mismanagement of the limited owner herself.\nThe position therefore is that if there is no necessity in fact or if the alienee could not prove that he made bona fide enquiries and was satisfied about its existence, the transfer is undoubtedly not void but the transferee would get only the widows estate in the property which does not affect in any way the interest of the reversioner.\nIn this case the alienation was by way of mortgage. The finding of both the Courts below is that there was no legal necessity which justified the execution of the security bond. The mortgagee also could not prove that there was representation of the legal necessity and that she satisfied herself by bona fide enquiries that such necessity did exist.\nOn this point the, finding recorded by the High Court is as follows \n In the present case, there is no scope for an argument that there was such representation of legal necessity or that on bona fide enquiry the alienee satisfied herself that there was such a necessity, for as I have already pointed out the security bond itself states that it was in consideration of benefits already received and with a view to induce Suhasini to forbear from proceeding against Mohini, that the bond was being executed.\nThere is no representation in the bond that the alienation was made with a view to securing any benefit to the estate or to avert any danger to the estate or for the purpose of any other legal necessity.\nWhatever enquiries the appellants may have made (1) 6 M.I.A, would be of no avail to them when the alienation is not binding on the whole estate but only on the womans estate of Rashmoni. In our opinion the view taken by the High Court is quite proper.\nOn this finding the security bond could operate only on the widows estate of Rashmoni and it was that interest alone which passed to the purchase. at the mortgage sale. The subsequent transferee could not claim to have acquired any higher right than what his predecessor had and it is immaterial whether he bona fide paid the purchase money or took proper legal advice.", + "expert_5": "In the first place the money borrowed by Mohini or deposited by him in Court did not and could not benefit Haripadas estate at all.\nAs was found, on investigation of accounts, under orders of the High Court later on, nothing at all was due to the receiver by the estate of Haripada or Mohini.\nOn the other hand, both the brothers were entitled to get a fairly large sum of money from the receiver.\nit was Mohini who acted in hot haste to execute the mortgage, his only object being to get the properties in his own hands.\nIt may be, that it was not possible to know the actual state of affairs with regard to the receivers accounts and consequently it might well have been thought prudent to borrow money to ward off what was considered to be a danger to the estate. This might furnish some excuse or explanation for Mohinis borrowing money on the 28th January, 191 1,\nbut that could not make the act of Rashmoni in executing the security bond, seven months after that event, an act of prudent management on her part dictated either by legal necessity or considerations of benefit to the estate of her deceased son In the first place it is to be noted-that the total amount borrowed by Mohini was Rs. 30,000 out of which Rs. 20,950 only were required to be deposited in Court.\nThe recital in the security bond that the rest of the money was spent by, Mohini to pay off certain debts of Rashmoni herself and also to meet the litigation and household expenses of both of them has been held by the Subordinate Judge to be false.\nIt has been found on facts that Rashmoni had no occasion to incur any debts either for litigation expenses or for any other purpose.\nEven if the release of the estate was considered to be desirable, that had been already accomplished by Mohini who borrowed money on his own responsibility.\nThe utmost that could be said was that Rashmoni was bound to reimburse Mohini to the extent that the deposit of money by Mohini had benefited the estate of Haripada.\nUndoubtedly the accounts were still to be investigated but what necessity there possibly could be for Rashmoni to execute, after the High Court had made the order as stated above, a security bond by which she mortgaged all the properties that were allotted to Haripada in his share as an additional security for the entire loan of Rs. 30,000 no portion of which be defied the estate of Haripada at all?\nIn our opinion the only object of executing the security bond was to protect Mohini who was threatened with legal proceedings by his creditor for having included a nonexistent property in the mortgage bond.\nBut by no stretch of imagination could it be regarded as a prudent act on the part of a Hindu female heir which was necessary for the protection of the estate of the last male holder.\nIn our opinion the view taken by the Courts below is quite proper and as a concurrent finding of fact it should not be disturbed by this Court.\nThe alienation here, was by way of mortgage and so no question of surrender could possibly arise.\nMohini being the immediate reversioner who joined in the execution of the security bond must be deemed to have consented to the transaction. Such consent may raise a presumption that the transaction was for legal necessity or that the mortgagee had acted therein after proper and bona flde enquiry and has satisfied himself as to the existence of such necessity(1).\nBut this. presumption is rebuttable and it is open to the actual reversioner to establish that there was in fact no legal necessity and there has been no proper and bonafide enquiry by the mortgagee. There is no doubt that both the Courts below have proceeded on a correct view of law and both have come to the conclusion upon a consideration of the evidence in the case that the presumption that arose by reason of the then reversioners giving consent to the transaction was rebutted by the facts transpiring in evidence.\nAt the most it can be regarded only as an admission by a presumptive reversioner and cannot have any higher value than the consent expressed by Mohini who figured as a co-execuitant of the security bond.\nIt cannot bind the actual reversioner in any way.\nBut the true import of this passage was discussed by the Privy Council in their later pronouncement in Rangasami Gounden v. Nachippa Gounden(1) and it was held that the words referred to above should I not be construed to lay down the proposition that such consent on the part of the father would operate proprio vigore and would be binding on the sons. This proposition, Their Lordships observed, was opposed both to principle and authority, it being a settled doctrine of Hindu law that nobody has a vested right so long as the widow is alive and the eventual reversioner does not claim through anyone who went before him.\nAs the sons of Ram Narayan claim as heirs of Haripada and not of their father, the admissions, if any, made by the latter could not in any way bind them.\nThe interest of a Hindu widow in the pro- perties inherited by her bears no analogy or resemblance to what may be described as an equitable estate in English law and which cannot be followed in the hands of a bonafide purchaser for value without notice. From very early times the Hindu widows estate has been described as qualified proprietorship with powers of alienation only when there is justifying necessity, and the restrictions on the powers of alienation are inseparable from her estate (2). For legal necessity she can convey to another an absolute title to the property vested in her. If there is no legal necessity, the transferee gets only the widows estate which is not even an (1) 46 I.A. 72 at 83-84. Vide The Collector of Masaulipatam v. Cavaly Venkata, \n M.I.A. 529, indefeasible life estate for it can come to an end not merely on her death but on the happening of other contingencies like re-marriage, adoption, etc.\nIf an alienee from a Hindu widow succeeds in establishing that there was legal necessity for transfer, he is completely protected and it is immaterial that the necessity was brought about by the mismanagement of the limited owner herself. Even if there is no necessity in fact, but it is proved that there was representation of necessity and the alienee after making bona fide enquiries satisfied himself as best as he could that such necessity existed, then as the Privy Council pointed out in Hunooman Persaud Pandays case (1) the actual existence of a legal necessity is not a condition precedent to the validity of the sale.\nif the alienee could not prove that he made bona fide enquiries and was satisfied about its existence, the transfer is undoubtedly not void but the transferee would get only the widows estate in the property which does not affect in any way the interest of the reversioner.\nThe finding of both the Courts below is that there was no legal necessity which justified the execution of the security bond. The mortgagee also could not prove that there was representation of the legal necessity and that she satisfied herself by bona fide enquiries that such necessity did exist.\nIn our opinion the view taken by the High Court is quite proper. On this finding the security bond could operate only on the widows estate of Rashmoni and it was that interest alone which passed to the purchase. at the mortgage sale. The subsequent transferee could not claim to have acquired any higher right than what his predecessor had and it is immaterial whether he bona fide paid the purchase money or took proper legal advice." + }, + "1959_134": { + "expert_1": "The suit was filed by the present appellants for a declaration of their title to 136 odd bighas of Ryotikasht lands and for possession thereof either exclusively or jointly with the defendants. A claim for mesne profits and interest was also made.\nThe suit was decreed by the Subordinate Judge, Motihari, on the ground that the defendants were in possession of the suit lands as benamidars. The trial Judge found that the consideration for the acquisition of these lands had proceeded from the predecessor of the plaintiffs, who had acquired them in the farzi names of Prahlad Rai, Gulraj Rai and Nawrang Rai. He also held that the benamidars were related to Radhumal by marriage, and that Radhumal found it convenient to use their names. These findings were accepted by the present respondents in the High Court. They, however, raised before the High Court certain contentions found against them by the trial Judge. In the plaint, the appellants had given their reasons for acquiring the property benami in the names of Prahlad Rai, Gulraj Rai and Nawrang Rai. They had stated that, according to the terms of the lease, ryoti lands taken in the names of the lessee or his relatives and servants were liable to be resumed by the Bettiah Raj after the termination of the lease, and that the benami transaction was entered into to avoid this contingency.\n The answering respondents, therefore, contended in the Court of First Instance that the predecessor of the appellants had caused these lands to be settled by the Bettiah Raj benami in their names to effectuate a fraud upon the Bettiah Raj, and the fraud having succeeded, the plaintiffs-appellants were not entitled to a judgment. They also contended that after the termination of the lease of the appellants with the Bettiah Raj these lands were settled or deemed to be settled with them. Both these grounds were accepted by the High Court. In this Court, the respondents have taken the same stand, and have also contended that the acquisition of these lands having been achieved by means of forging the signatures of Prahlad Rai, Gulraj Rai and Nawrang Rai, the present appellants are not entitled to a judgment on the application of the maxim, ex turpi causa non oritur actio. They, however, contend that if it be the view of the Court that both the parties had conspired to deceive the Bettiah Raj or were guilty of illegality, even then, potior est conditio defendantis.\nBy the decisions of the two Courts below and the concession of the respondents, all questions of fact must be taken to be finally decided. The question as to whether the acquisition was benami or not cannot any longer be-reopened, and the case has therefore to be considered only with regard to the principles contained in the maxims above referred to and the fact whether there was any fraud intended on the Bettiah Raj and, if so, whether it was effected and who was responsible for it.\nIn 1936, proceedings under s. 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure were commenced, which terminated in favour of Prahlad Rais party by an order of the Sub-Divisional Officer on June 4, 1936. The order of the Sub-Divisional Officer was, however, reversed by the District Magistrate, Champaran, and on revision to the High Court, the finding of the District Magistrate was reversed in its turn, though the rule itself was discharged. The High Court recommended the commencement of proceedings under s. 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, if there was any apprehension of breach of peace.\n These proceedings were commenced and finally terminated on May 18, 1942, by an order against the appellants, who were therefore compelled to bring this suit inasmuch as, according to them, the decision in the criminal courts cast a cloud upon their title.\nThe main issue around which the controversy in the present case has revolved in the trial Court is the fifth, framed by the Subordinate Judge. It reads as follows Are the defendants farzidars of the plaintiffs in respect of the suit lands ? As we have already stated above, this issue has now been finally decided in favour of the appellants.\nWe begin with the point about the creation of a new tenancy by the Bettiah Raj after the expiry of the lease granted to Radhumal. We may point out that this aspect of the case was not pleaded by the answering respondents, and it is difficult to accept this case, which requires fresh evidence and material for a finding.\nIn view of these two facts, we must say, with respect, that the High Court was in error in constructing a new case for the respondents. It is not open to a Court in appeal to consider media concludendi not pleaded by a party and to give judgment on their basis.\nWhere both parties do not show that there was any conspiracy to defraud a third person or to commit any other illegal act, the maxim, in pari delicto etc., can hardly be made applicable. The appellants and the answering respondents were not in pari delicto. The respondents claimed to be innocent parties, who had acquired the lands themselves, and the appellants, on the other hand, stated that the respondents knew nothing about the matter and were not even consulted.\nIn our opinion, the application of the maxim was erroneous.\nIn view of the fact that fraud cannot be said to have been effected, we do not think that the appellants who have clearly established the benami nature of the transactions can be deprived of their judgment. The authorities do not go to that length, because public policy demands that where fraud might have been contemplated but was not perpetrated, the defendants should not be allowed to perpetrate a new fraud.\nNo doubt, the making of the signatures of another person without his consent, express or implied, is an offence under the ordinary law, but the intention was not so much to forge the signatures but to present the application in the names of those persons.\nwe proceed on the assumption that there was some illegality committed by Radhumal in approaching the Bettiah Raj and also in the execution of the B.H. forms, which were also signed with the names of these persons. The question is whether this illegality is sufficient to non-suit the plaintiffs on the application of the maxim.\nThe principle of public policy is this ex dolo malo non oritur actio. No Court will lend its aid to a man who founds his cause of action upon an immoral or an illegal act. If, from the plaintiffs own stating or otherwise, the cause of action appears to arise ex turpi causa, or the transgression of a positive law of this country, there the Court says he has no right to be assisted. It is upon that ground the Court goes not for the sake of the defendant, but because they will not lend their aid to such a plaintiff. So if the plaintiff and defendant were to change sides, and the defendant was to bring his action against the plaintiff, the latter would then have the advantage of it for where both are equally in fault, potior est conditio defendentis.\nEven in India, certain exceptions to the rule of turpi causa have been accepted.\nThe application of the rule is, however, conditioned by one thing, namely, that a plaintiff who is not allowed to succeed must be unable to sustain an action except upon the plea of the illegality committed by him.\nThe correct position in law, in our opinion, is that what one has to see is whether the illegality goes so much to the root of the matter that the plaintiff cannot bring his action without relying upon the illegal transaction into which he had entered. If the illegality be trivial or venial, as stated by Williston and the plaintiff is not required to rest his case upon that illegality, then public policy demands that the defendant should not be allowed to take advantage of the position. A strict view, of course, must be taken of the plaintiffs conduct, and he should not be allowed to circumvent the illegality by resorting to some subterfuge or by mis-stating the facts. If, however, the matters is clear and the illegality is not required to be pleaded or proved as part of the cause of action and the plaintiff recanted before the illegal purpose was achieved, then, unless it be of such a gross nature as to outrage the conscience of the Court, the plea of the defendant should not prevail.\nIn the present case, the object of the benami transaction was merely to keep the property from being resumed by the Bettiah Raj on the expiry of the lease in favour of Radhumal, which undoubtedly the Bettiah Raj could have done, if it had been so minded. The information about the benami transaction was, however, not withheld from the Bettiah Raj, and even with that knowledge, the Bettiah Raj took no action against Radhumal or the benamidars. The plaintiffs recanted inasmuch as they asserted their true title and true facts before the occasion for the Raj to act arose.\nThus, the fraud, though intended, was not perpetrated, because the fraud could only be effected at the end of the lease term, and the locus poenitentiae which the lessee possessed was duly used long before the expiry of the lease.\nThe illegality was also of a trivial character,\nThe appellants were not required to prove this fact as part of their cause of action, and indeed, if the answering respondents are to be believed, they asserted as vehemently that the signatures were not forged but were their very own. In establishing the benami nature of a transaction, the cardinal point to be proved is the source of money and this was done, and it was also established that Prahlad Rai and others were merely farzidars. To prove these things, it did not require the proof of the signatures", + "expert_2": "In the plaint, the appellants had given their reasons for acquiring the property benami in the names of Prahlad Rai, Gulraj Rai and Nawrang Rai. They had stated that, according to the terms of the lease, ryoti lands taken in the names of the lessee or his relatives and servants were liable to be resumed by the Bettiah Raj after the termination of the lease, and that the benami transaction was entered into to avoid this contingency.\nIn this Court, the respondents have taken the same stand, and have also contended that the acquisition of these lands having been achieved by means of forging the signatures of Prahlad Rai, Gulraj Rai and Nawrang Rai, the present appellants are not entitled to a judgment on the application of the maxim, ex turpi causa non oritur actio.\nThe question as to whether the acquisition was benami or not cannot any longer be-reopened, and the case has therefore to be considered only with regard to the principles contained in the maxims above referred to and the fact whether there was any fraud intended on the Bettiah Raj and, if so, whether it was effected and who was responsible for it.\nWhile the appellants claim that Radhumal did not even consider it necessary to obtain the consent of these three persons and even did not obtain their signatures, the respondents claim that Radhumal had nothing whatever to do with the acquisition of these lands and had merely recommended them to the Bettiah Raj in his capacity as the lessee.\nWhere both parties do not show that there was any conspiracy to defraud a third person or to commit any other illegal act, the maxim, in pari delicto etc., can hardly be made applicable.\nThe appellants contend that the Bettiah Raj was in full possession of the information that this was a benami transaction and salami was obtained to the tune of Rs. 1,680 and was waived only in respect of lands considered not worthy of demanding a salami. It is stated by the appellants in the evidence that the Bettiah Raj was informed about the benami nature of the transaction and Rai Bahadur Motilal Basu, the Assistant Manager of the Bettiah Raj, which was under the Court of Wards, was informed about this.\nThe District Magistrate was an officer of the Court of Wards, and he knew by 1936 that the tenancies were taken benami by Radhumal. After the expiry of the lease, the Court of Wards did not enforce clause 16 in spite of this knowledge, and it therefore appears that the fraud was not effected, because the person or authority said to be defrauded knew all the facts, and elected not to take any action.\nNo doubt, the making of the signatures of another person without his consent, express or implied, is an offence under the ordinary law, but the intention was not so much to forge the signatures but to present the application in the names of those persons.\nHowever it be, we proceed on the assumption that there was some illegality committed by Radhumal in approaching the Bettiah Raj and also in the execution of the B.H. forms, which were also signed with the names of these persons. The question is whether this illegality is sufficient to non-suit the plaintiffs on the application of the maxim.\nNo Court will lend its aid to a man who founds his cause of action upon an immoral or an illegal act. If, from the plaintiffs own stating or otherwise, the cause of action appears to arise ex turpi causa, or the transgression of a positive law of this country, there the Court says he has no right to be assisted. It is upon that ground the Court goes not for the sake of the defendant, but because they will not lend their aid to such a plaintiff. So if the plaintiff and defendant were to change sides, and the defendant was to bring his action against the plaintiff, the latter would then have the advantage of it for where both are equally in fault, potior est conditio defendentis. There are, however, some exceptions or supposed exceptions to the rule of turpi causa.\nfour such exceptions have been mentioned, and the fourth of these exceptions is based on the right of restitutio in integrum, where the relationship of trustee and beneficiary is involved.\nIn the first case, it was laid down that the test was whether a demand connected with an illegal transaction was capable of being enforced in law, and whether the plaintiff required any aid from the illegal transaction to establish his case. Tindal, C.J., in the second case observed as follows I think that this case may be determined on the short ground that the plaintiff is unable to establish his claim as stated upon the record, without relying upon the illegal agreement originally entered into between himself and the defendant. In the last case, Mellor, J., observed that the true test was by considering whether the plaintiff could make out his case otherwise than through the medium and by the aid of the illegal transaction to which he was himself a party.\n In Alexander v. Rayson 1936 1 K.B. 169, it was held by the Court of Appeal that there was a locus poenitentiae but that the repentance must be before the fraud or illegality had been carried out. Recently, the Court of Appeal in Bowmakers Ltd. v. Barnet Instruments, Ltd. 1945 1 K.B. 65, reviewed the law on the subject, and laid down that every illegality did not entitle the Court to refuse a judgment to a plaintiff.\nThe correct position in law, in our opinion, is that what one has to see is whether the illegality goes so much to the root of the matter that the plaintiff cannot bring his action without relying upon the illegal transaction into which he had entered. If the illegality be trivial or venial, as stated by Williston and the plaintiff is not required to rest his case upon that illegality, then public policy demands that the defendant should not be allowed to take advantage of the position. A strict view, of course, must be taken of the plaintiffs conduct, and he should not be allowed to circumvent the illegality by resorting to some subterfuge or by mis-stating the facts. If, however, the matters is clear and the illegality is not required to be pleaded or proved as part of the cause of action and the plaintiff recanted before the illegal purpose was achieved, then, unless it be of such a gross nature as to outrage the conscience of the Court, the plea of the defendant should not prevail.\n We must remember that benami transactions are common in India, and have always been recognised. They are entered into for a variety of reasons, and the benamidar holds the property in trust for his principal.\nIn the present case, the object of the benami transaction was merely to keep the property from being resumed by the Bettiah Raj on the expiry of the lease in favour of Radhumal, which undoubtedly the Bettiah Raj could have done, if it had been so minded.\nThe information about the benami transaction was, however, not withheld from the Bettiah Raj, and even with that knowledge, the Bettiah Raj took no action against Radhumal or the benamidars. The plaintiffs recanted inasmuch as they asserted their true title and true facts before the occasion for the Raj to act arose. Thus, the fraud, though intended, was not perpetrated, because the fraud could only be effected at the end of the lease term, and the locus poenitentiae which the lessee possessed was duly used long before the expiry of the lease.\nThe appellants were not required to prove this fact as part of their cause of action, and indeed, if the answering respondents are to be believed, they asserted as vehemently that the signatures were not forged but were their very own. In establishing the benami nature of a transaction, the cardinal point to be proved is the source of money and this was done, and it was also established that Prahlad Rai and others were merely farzidars.", + "expert_3": "The suit was filed by the present appellants for a declaration of their title to 136 odd bighas of Ryotikasht lands and for possession thereof either exclusively or jointly with the defendants. A claim for mesne profits and interest was also made. The suit was decreed by the Subordinate Judge, Motihari, on the ground that the defendants were in possession of the suit lands as benamidars.\nThe trial Judge found that the consideration for the acquisition of these lands had proceeded from the predecessor of the plaintiffs, who had acquired them in the farzi names of Prahlad Rai, Gulraj Rai and Nawrang Rai. He also held that the benamidars were related to Radhumal by marriage, and that Radhumal found it convenient to use their names. These findings were accepted by the present respondents in the High Court\nThey, however, raised before the High Court certain contentions found against them by the trial Judge. In the plaint, the appellants had given their reasons for acquiring the property benami in the names of Prahlad Rai, Gulraj Rai and Nawrang Rai. They had stated that, according to the terms of the lease, ryoti lands taken in the names of the lessee or his relatives and servants were liable to be resumed by the Bettiah Raj after the termination of the lease, and that the benami transaction was entered into to avoid this contingency.\n The answering respondents, therefore, contended in the Court of First Instance that the predecessor of the appellants had caused these lands to be settled by the Bettiah Raj benami in their names to effectuate a fraud upon the Bettiah Raj, and the fraud having succeeded, the plaintiffs-appellants were not entitled to a judgment\nThey also contended that after the termination of the lease of the appellants with the Bettiah Raj these lands were settled or deemed to be settled with them\nBoth these grounds were accepted by the High Court. In this Court, the respondents have taken the same stand, and have also contended that the acquisition of these lands having been achieved by means of forging the signatures of Prahlad Rai, Gulraj Rai and Nawrang Rai, the present appellants are not entitled to a judgment on the application of the maxim, ex turpi causa non oritur actio. They, however, contend that if it be the view of the Court that both the parties had conspired to deceive the Bettiah Raj or were guilty of illegality, even then, potior est conditio defendantis\nBy the decisions of the two Courts below and the concession of the respondents, all questions of fact must be taken to be finally decided. The question as to whether the acquisition was benami or not cannot any longer be-reopened, and the case has therefore to be considered only with regard to the principles contained in the maxims above referred to and the fact whether there was any fraud intended on the Bettiah Raj and, if so, whether it was effected and who was responsible for it.\nOn April 1, 1922, the manager of the Court of Wards, Bettiah Raj, granted a lease of village Bijbania for 10 years (Asin 1327 to Bhado 1336, vide Ex. 7, to Radhumal, who was the karta of the joint family now represented by the plaintiffs and Mahadeo, respondent 6. On June 26, 1931, the lease was renewed for a further period of 10 years (1337 to 1346)\nTwo of the conditions of this lease will have to be referred to in the sequel, and may conveniently be quoted here for easy reference \n Not to make any settlement of land with a raiyat or other tenant without the consent of the manager, and in any application for such consent to any settlement of land recorded as zirat or bakasht in the record of rights to state the reason of the lessee for wishing to make such settlement, and the area or zirat or bakasht land which would remain in the demised property after such settlement if it were made, and when it is proposed to make any settlement with a relative or servant of the lessee to state that fact and it is hereby declared that the manager shall be entitled as a condition of giving consent to any such settlement to require that an amount to be assessed by him shall be charged as a salami on any such settlement. Not to retain possession after the expiry of lease of any raiyati holdings or other interest in the leased property, acquired during the term of the lease whether by private purchase, purchase at auction sale, mortgage, sub-lease, surrender or otherwise, and any such holding or interest thus acquired will pass to the lessor, provided that the lessee will be entitled to receive from the lessor a sum equivalent to any loss he may have suffered by purchasing holdings at auction sales for arrears of rent, the loss to be calculated by setting against the purchase price the profits made by the lessee from the land since the date of purchase subject to any general instructions which may be issued by the Board of Revenue, the Manager will determine the amount to be received by the lessee under this clause, and his decisions will be final.\nBetween the years 1920 to 1925 Radhumal acquired 136 odd bighas of lands, now the subject of dispute, in various ways. 94 odd bighas were purchased at Court sale, 7 odd bighas by private sales and 6 odd bighas were acquired by abandonment of tenancies by the previous tenants. These 136 odd bighas also included 27 odd bighas of lands, which are described as Ghair Mazrua, Patti Kadim and Kabil Lagon. These lands were settled with Prahlad Rai, Gulraj Rai and Nawrang Rai by the Bettiah Raj.\nThe answering respondents are Prahlad Rai and the legal representatives of the other two\nIn settling these lands with these persons, Radhumal himself as lessee recommended them to the Bettiah Raj, and it is now proved and admitted in the case that he had also caused the signatures of these persons to be made upon the documents filed in the Bettiah Raj by others than the apparent signatories. As has been pointed out already, this device was resorted to, to avoid the operation of clause 16 of the lease quoted above. It was also used to reduce the salami payable to the Bettiah Raj under clause 4 which in the case of a stranger was lower than in the case of the lessee, his relatives and servants. The respondents had denied all these pleas, and had stated that the lands were settled with them by the Bettiah Raj, and that they were not the benamidars of Radhumal\nThey now rely upon the facts pleaded by the appellants in regard to the device resorted to, to save the lands from the operation of cls. 16 and 4 and further plead the illegal conduct of Radhumal in causing the signatures of Prahlad Rai, Gulraj Rai and Nawrang Rai to be forged on the documents filed with the Bettiah Raj\nRadhumal died on February 28, 1934. After his death, Bala Prasad, appellant No. 3, was adopted, and the adoption was also recognised by the Bettiah Raj. The lease was also transferred to the name of Bala Prasad. In 1935, it is alleged the widow denied, at the instigation of Mahadeo, respondent 6, this adoption, and Mahadeo, in his turn, started to disclaim all interest in the property\nThe other respondents also began asserting their title against the heirs and representatives of Radhumal\nIt was also alleged that Mahadeo had removed all the kabalas and some of the receipts and had given them to Prahlad Rai, which were used by the answering respondents in all subsequent proceedings\nIn 1936, proceedings under s. 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure were commenced, which terminated in favour of Prahlad Rais party by an order of the Sub-Divisional Officer on June 4, 1936. The order of the Sub-Divisional Officer was, however, reversed by the District Magistrate, Champaran, and on revision to the High Court, the finding of the District Magistrate was reversed in its turn, though the rule itself was discharged. The High Court recommended the commencement of proceedings under s. 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, if there was any apprehension of breach of peace.\n These proceedings were commenced and finally terminated on May 18, 1942, by an order against the appellants, who were therefore compelled to bring this suit inasmuch as, according to them, the decision in the criminal courts cast a cloud upon their title.\nThe main issue around which the controversy in the present case has revolved in the trial Court is the fifth, framed by the Subordinate Judge. It reads as follows Are the defendants farzidars of the plaintiffs in respect of the suit lands ?\nAs we have already stated above, this issue has now been finally decided in favour of the appellants. The High Court has held that they are not entitled to a judgment in spite of this finding, on the ground that they had perpetrated a fraud upon the Bettiah Raj, and this fraud disentitles them to a judgment. The High Court has also stated that after the termination of the lease, the answering respondents must be deemed to be ryoti tenants of the Bettiah Raj, because rent was accepted from them and not from the lessee.\nOne of the learned Judges of the High Court decided the case mainly on this ground, but the learned Chief Justice gave reasons on both the points. The learned Chief Justice also adverted to the fact that there were certain illegalities committed by Radhumal, which made the condition of the respondents stronger\nThe case of the respondents was that they had taken settlement of these lands from the Bettiah Raj in the very beginning\nThere was no occasion, therefore, for a fresh settlement with them, and the plea that after the expiry of the lease there was, in fact, or there must be deemed in law, a fresh settlement with them, is not open to them\nThere is evidence in the case to show that B. H. forms were not issued once again after the expiry of the lease given to Radhumal.\nR. N. Prasad (P.W. 3) stated that a certified copy of the B. H. form under which land was settled with a ryoti tenant was issued to the settle for his information, and no such fresh B. H. forms have been produced by the respondents\nIn view of these two facts, we must say, with respect, that the High Court was in error in constructing a new case for the respondents. It is not open to a Court in appeal to consider media concludendi not pleaded by a party and to give judgment on their basis.\nThe maxim, in pari delicto etc., can hardly be made applicable in this context. Neither the appellants nor the respondents at any time pleaded that Prahlad Rai, Gulraj Rai and Nawrang Rai conspired to effect a fraud upon the Bettiah Raj.\nIn this respect, the cases of the appellants and the respondents are poles apart. While the appellants claim that Radhumal did not even consider it necessary to obtain the consent of these three persons and even did not obtain their signatures, the respondents claim that Radhumal had nothing whatever to do with the acquisition of these lands and had merely recommended them to the Bettiah Raj in his capacity as the lessee\nWhere both parties do not show that there was any conspiracy to defraud a third person or to commit any other illegal act, the maxim, in pari delicto etc., can hardly be made applicable. The appellants and the answering respondents were not in pari delicto\nThe respondents claimed to be innocent parties, who had acquired the lands themselves, and the appellants, on the other hand, stated that the respondents knew nothing about the matter and were not even consulted. In our opinion, the application of the maxim was erroneous\nThis leaves over for consideration firstly whether a fraud was effected upon the Bettiah Raj, and whether it was successful\nR. H. Prasad (P.W. 3) stated that Rai Bahadur Moti Lal Basu was Assistant Manager of the Estate, and that he was an experienced officer. Narain Lal, (P.W. 17), deposed that in his presence Radhumal had told Moti Lal Basu that he was taking the settlements in the farzi names of his relations. It is also clear that in 1936 when the dispute went to the District Magistrate, Champar an, all these facts were set out in the rival cases of the parties - both under ss. 144 and 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The District Magistrate was an officer of the Court of Wards, and he knew by 1936 that the tenancies were taken benami by Radhumal. After the expiry of the lease, the Court of Wards did not enforce clause 16 in spite of this knowledge, and it therefore appears that the fraud was not effected, because the person or authority said to be defrauded knew all the facts, and elected not to take any action\nThere is nothing in the record beyond the statement of the appellants in the plaint to show that the salami was unduly low\nIt has been held, however, that Radhumal paid the salami, a fact not now questioned.\n The rival admissions cancel each other and leave the matter at large. The matter was never put in issue except as to who paid the salami and the sufficiency or otherwise of the salami was never tried.\nIn view of the fact that fraud cannot be said to have been effected, we do not think that the appellants who have clearly established the benami nature of the transactions can be deprived of their judgment. The authorities do not go to that length, because public policy demands that where fraud might have been contemplated but was not perpetrated, the defendants should not be allowed to perpetrate a new fraud\nThe case of the appellants was that the property was taken benami in the names of Prahlad Rai and others to avid the implication of clause 16. In making the application to the Bettiah Raj the signatures of Prahlad Rai and others were made by Radhumal or some one under his instructions, because the relationship between Radhumal, Prahlad Rai and others was so intimate that it was considered unnecessary to trouble them.\nInasmuch, as the matter was brought to the notice of the Assistant Manager of the Court of Wards, all these facts were capable of being investigated, including the making of the signatures by Radhumal.\n No doubt, the making of the signatures of another person without his consent, express or implied, is an offence under the ordinary law, but the intention was not so much to forge the signatures but to present the application in the names of those persons. However it be, we proceed on the assumption that there was some illegality committed by Radhumal in approaching the Bettiah Raj and also in the execution of the B.H. forms, which were also signed with the names of these persons\nThe question is whether this illegality is sufficient to non-suit the plaintiffs on the application of the maxim.\nThe principle of public policy is this ex dolo malo non oritur actio. No Court will lend its aid to a man who founds his cause of action upon an immoral or an illegal act. If, from the plaintiffs own stating or otherwise, the cause of action appears to arise ex turpi causa, or the transgression of a positive law of this country, there the Court says he has no right to be assisted.\nIt is upon that ground the Court goes not for the sake of the defendant, but because they will not lend their aid to such a plaintiff. So if the plaintiff and defendant were to change sides, and the defendant was to bring his action against the plaintiff, the latter would then have the advantage of it for where both are equally in fault, potior est conditio defendentis\nThere are, however, some exceptions or supposed exceptions to the rule of turpi causa. In Salmond and William on Contracts, four such exceptions have been mentioned, and the fourth of these exceptions is based on the right of restitutio in integrum, where the relationship of trustee and beneficiary is involved.\nIn such cases public policy requires that the rule of turpis causa shall be excluded by the more important and imperative rule that agents and trustees must faithfully perform the duties of their office\nnoted certain exceptional cases, and has observed as follows If recovery is to be allowed by either partner or principal in any case, it must be where the illegality is of so light or venial a character that it is deemed more opposed to public policy to allow the defendant to violate his fiduciary relation with the plaintiff than to allow the plaintiff to gain the benefit of an illegal transaction.\nEven in India, certain exceptions to the rule of turpi causa have been accepted\nThe application of the rule is, however, conditioned by one thing, namely, that a plaintiff who is not allowed to succeed must be unable to sustain an action except upon the plea of the illegality committed by him\nIn the first case, it was laid down that the test was whether a demand connected with an illegal transaction was capable of being enforced in law, and whether the plaintiff required any aid from the illegal transaction to establish his case. Tindal, C.J., in the second case observed as follows I think that this case may be determined on the short ground that the plaintiff is unable to establish his claim as stated upon the record, without relying upon the illegal agreement originally entered into between himself and the defendant. In the last case, Mellor, J., observed that the true test was by considering whether the plaintiff could make out his case otherwise than through the medium and by the aid of the illegal transaction to which he was himself a party.\nIn Alexander v. Rayson 1936 1 K.B. 169, it was held by the Court of Appeal that there was a locus poenitentiae but that the repentance must be before the fraud or illegality had been carried out\nevery illegality did not entitle the Court to refuse a judgment to a plaintiff. Du Parcq, L.J., observed as follows In our opinion, a mans right to possess his own chattels will as a general rule be enforced against one who, without any claim of right, is detaining them, or has converted them to his own use, even though it may appear either from the pleadings, or in the course of the trial, that the chattels in question came into the defendants possession by reason of an illegal contract between himself and the plaintiff, provided that the plaintiff does not seek, and is not forced, either to found his claim on the illegal contract or to plead its illegality in order to support his claim.\nThe correct position in law, in our opinion, is that what one has to see is whether the illegality goes so much to the root of the matter that the plaintiff cannot bring his action without relying upon the illegal transaction into which he had entered. If the illegality be trivial or venial, as stated by Williston and the plaintiff is not required to rest his case upon that illegality, then public policy demands that the defendant should not be allowed to take advantage of the position. A strict view, of course, must be taken of the plaintiffs conduct, and he should not be allowed to circumvent the illegality by resorting to some subterfuge or by mis-stating the facts.\nIf, however, the matters is clear and the illegality is not required to be pleaded or proved as part of the cause of action and the plaintiff recanted before the illegal purpose was achieved, then, unless it be of such a gross nature as to outrage the conscience of the Court, the plea of the defendant should not prevail.\nWe must remember that benami transactions are common in India, and have always been recognised. They are entered into for a variety of reasons, and the benamidar holds the property in trust for his principal\nIn the present case, the object of the benami transaction was merely to keep the property from being resumed by the Bettiah Raj on the expiry of the lease in favour of Radhumal, which undoubtedly the Bettiah Raj could have done, if it had been so minded. The information about the benami transaction was, however, not withheld from the Bettiah Raj, and even with that knowledge, the Bettiah Raj took no action against Radhumal or the benamidars.\nThe plaintiffs recanted inasmuch as they asserted their true title and true facts before the occasion for the Raj to act arose. Thus, the fraud, though intended, was not perpetrated, because the fraud could only be effected at the end of the lease term, and the locus poenitentiae which the lessee possessed was duly used long before the expiry of the lease. The illegality was also of a trivial character, inasmuch as the signatures of Prahlad Rai and others were made on the relative documents on the faith of their close friendship and relationship and under the assumption that no objection from them would proceed to the making of the application on their behalf and to the signing of the B.\nH. forms in their names. The appellants were not required to prove this fact as part of their cause of action, and indeed, if the answering respondents are to be believed, they asserted as vehemently that the signatures were not forged but were their very own\nIn establishing the benami nature of a transaction, the cardinal point to be proved is the source of money and this was done, and it was also established that Prahlad Rai and others were merely farzidars. To prove these things, it did not require the proof of the signatures", + "expert_4": "The suit was filed by the present appellants for a declaration of their title to 136 odd bighas of Ryotikasht lands and for possession thereof either exclusively or jointly with the defendants.\nA claim for mesne profits and interest was also made.\nThe suit was decreed by the Subordinate Judge, Motihari, on the ground that the defendants were in possession of the suit lands as benamidars.\nThe trial Judge found that the consideration for the acquisition of these lands had proceeded from the predecessor of the plaintiffs, who had acquired them in the farzi names of Prahlad Rai, Gulraj Rai and Nawrang Rai. He also held that the benamidars were related to Radhumal by marriage, and that Radhumal found it convenient to use their names.\nThese findings were accepted by the present respondents in the High Court. They, however, raised before the High Court certain contentions found against them by the trial Judge.\nIn the plaint, the appellants had given their reasons for acquiring the property benami in the names of Prahlad Rai, Gulraj Rai and Nawrang Rai.\nThey had stated that, according to the terms of the lease, ryoti lands taken in the names of the lessee or his relatives and servants were liable to be resumed by the Bettiah Raj after the termination of the lease, and that the benami transaction was entered into to avoid this contingency.\nThe answering respondents, therefore, contended in the Court of First Instance that the predecessor of the appellants had caused these lands to be settled by the Bettiah Raj benami in their names to effectuate a fraud upon the Bettiah Raj, and the fraud having succeeded, the plaintiffs-appellants were not entitled to a judgment.\nThey also contended that after the termination of the lease of the appellants with the Bettiah Raj these lands were settled or deemed to be settled with them.\nIn this Court, the respondents have taken the same stand, and have also contended that the acquisition of these lands having been achieved by means of forging the signatures of Prahlad Rai, Gulraj Rai and Nawrang Rai, the present appellants are not entitled to a judgment on the application of the maxim, ex turpi causa non oritur actio.\nThey, however, contend that if it be the view of the Court that both the parties had conspired to deceive the Bettiah Raj or were guilty of illegality, even then, potior est conditio defendantis.\nBy the decisions of the two Courts below and the concession of the respondents, all questions of fact must be taken to be finally decided.\nThe question as to whether the acquisition was benami or not cannot any longer be-reopened, and the case has therefore to be considered only with regard to the principles contained in the maxims above referred to and the fact whether there was any fraud intended on the Bettiah Raj and, if so, whether it was effected and who was responsible for it.\nIn settling these lands with these persons, Radhumal himself as lessee recommended them to the Bettiah Raj, and it is now proved and admitted in the case that he had also caused the signatures of these persons to be made upon the documents filed in the Bettiah Raj by others than the apparent signatories.\nAs has been pointed out already, this device was resorted to, to avoid the operation of clause 16 of the lease quoted above. It was also used to reduce the salami payable to the Bettiah Raj under clause 4 which in the case of a stranger was lower than in the case of the lessee, his relatives and servants.\nThey now rely upon the facts pleaded by the appellants in regard to the device resorted to, to save the lands from the operation of cls. 16 and 4 and further plead the illegal conduct of Radhumal in causing the signatures of Prahlad Rai, Gulraj Rai and Nawrang Rai to be forged on the documents filed with the Bettiah Raj.\nRadhumal died on February 28, 1934. After his death, Bala Prasad, appellant No. 3, was adopted, and the adoption was also recognised by the Bettiah Raj. The lease was also transferred to the name of Bala Prasad.\nIn 1935, it is alleged the widow denied, at the instigation of Mahadeo, respondent 6, this adoption, and Mahadeo, in his turn, started to disclaim all interest in the property. The other respondents also began asserting their title against the heirs and representatives of Radhumal. It was also alleged that Mahadeo had removed all the kabalas and some of the receipts and had given them to Prahlad Rai, which were used by the answering respondents in all subsequent proceedings.\nThe High Court recommended the commencement of proceedings under s. 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, if there was any apprehension of breach of peace.\nThese proceedings were commenced and finally terminated on May 18, 1942, by an order against the appellants, who were therefore compelled to bring this suit inasmuch as, according to them, the decision in the criminal courts cast a cloud upon their title.\nIt reads as follows Are the defendants farzidars of the plaintiffs in respect of the suit lands ?\nAs we have already stated above, this issue has now been finally decided in favour of the appellants.\nThe High Court has held that they are not entitled to a judgment in spite of this finding, on the ground that they had perpetrated a fraud upon the Bettiah Raj, and this fraud disentitles them to a judgment.\nThe High Court has also stated that after the termination of the lease, the answering respondents must be deemed to be ryoti tenants of the Bettiah Raj, because rent was accepted from them and not from the lessee.\nThe learned Chief Justice also adverted to the fact that there were certain illegalities committed by Radhumal, which made the condition of the respondents stronger.\nWe begin with the point about the creation of a new tenancy by the Bettiah Raj after the expiry of the lease granted to Radhumal. We may point out that this aspect of the case was not pleaded by the answering respondents, and it is difficult to accept this case, which requires fresh evidence and material for a finding.\nThe case of the respondents was that they had taken settlement of these lands from the Bettiah Raj in the very beginning. There was no occasion, therefore, for a fresh settlement with them, and the plea that after the expiry of the lease there was, in fact, or there must be deemed in law, a fresh settlement with them, is not open to them.\nThere is evidence in the case to show that B. H. forms were not issued once again after the expiry of the lease given to Radhumal.\nIn view of these two facts, we must say, with respect, that the High Court was in error in constructing a new case for the respondents.\nIt is not open to a Court in appeal to consider media concludendi not pleaded by a party and to give judgment on their basis.\nThe maxim, in pari delicto etc., can hardly be made applicable in this context.\nNeither the appellants nor the respondents at any time pleaded that Prahlad Rai, Gulraj Rai and Nawrang Rai conspired to effect a fraud upon the Bettiah Raj.\nWhile the appellants claim that Radhumal did not even consider it necessary to obtain the consent of these three persons and even did not obtain their signatures, the respondents claim that Radhumal had nothing whatever to do with the acquisition of these lands and had merely recommended them to the Bettiah Raj in his capacity as the lessee.\nThe appellants and the answering respondents were not in pari delicto.\nThe respondents claimed to be innocent parties, who had acquired the lands themselves, and the appellants, on the other hand, stated that the respondents knew nothing about the matter and were not even consulted.\nThis leaves over for consideration firstly whether a fraud was effected upon the Bettiah Raj, and whether it was successful.\nThe appellants contend that the Bettiah Raj was in full possession of the information that this was a benami transaction and salami was obtained to the tune of Rs. 1,680 and was waived only in respect of lands considered not worthy of demanding a salami.\nNarain Lal, (P.W. 17), deposed that in his presence Radhumal had told Moti Lal Basu that he was taking the settlements in the farzi names of his relations.\nIt is also clear that in 1936 when the dispute went to the District Magistrate, Champar an, all these facts were set out in the rival cases of the parties - both under ss. 144 and 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.\nAfter the expiry of the lease, the Court of Wards did not enforce clause 16 in spite of this knowledge, and it therefore appears that the fraud was not effected, because the person or authority said to be defrauded knew all the facts, and elected not to take any action.\nIt has been held, however, that Radhumal paid the salami, a fact not now questioned.\nIn view of the fact that fraud cannot be said to have been effected, we do not think that the appellants who have clearly established the benami nature of the transactions can be deprived of their judgment.\nThe authorities do not go to that length, because public policy demands that where fraud might have been contemplated but was not perpetrated, the defendants should not be allowed to perpetrate a new fraud.\nComing now to the question whether the appellants suit was rightly dismissed by the High Court on the application of the maxim, ex turpi causa etc., we have first to see what are the specific facts on which this contention is based.\nThe case of the appellants was that the property was taken benami in the names of Prahlad Rai and others to avid the implication of clause 16.\nIn making the application to the Bettiah Raj the signatures of Prahlad Rai and others were made by Radhumal or some one under his instructions, because the relationship between Radhumal, Prahlad Rai and others was so intimate that it was considered unnecessary to trouble them. Inasmuch, as the matter was brought to the notice of the Assistant Manager of the Court of Wards, all these facts were capable of being investigated, including the making of the signatures by Radhumal.\nNo doubt, the making of the signatures of another person without his consent, express or implied, is an offence under the ordinary law, but the intention was not so much to forge the signatures but to present the application in the names of those persons.\nHowever it be, we proceed on the assumption that there was some illegality committed by Radhumal in approaching the Bettiah Raj and also in the execution of the B.H. forms, which were also signed with the names of these persons.\nThe question is whether this illegality is sufficient to non-suit the plaintiffs on the application of the maxim.\nThe law was stated as far back as 1775 by Lord Mansfield in Holman v. Johnson (1775) 1 Cowp. 341, 343 98 E.R. 1120, 1121, in the following words The principle of public policy is this ex dolo malo non oritur actio.\nNo Court will lend its aid to a man who founds his cause of action upon an immoral or an illegal act. If, from the plaintiffs own stating or otherwise, the cause of action appears to arise ex turpi causa, or the transgression of a positive law of this country, there the Court says he has no right to be assisted.\nIt is upon that ground the Court goes not for the sake of the defendant, but because they will not lend their aid to such a plaintiff. So if the plaintiff and defendant were to change sides, and the defendant was to bring his action against the plaintiff, the latter would then have the advantage of it for where both are equally in fault, potior est conditio defendentis.\nThere are, however, some exceptions or supposed exceptions to the rule of turpi causa.\nIn Salmond and William on Contracts, four such exceptions have been mentioned, and the fourth of these exceptions is based on the right of restitutio in integrum, where the relationship of trustee and beneficiary is involved.\nSo if A employs B to commit a robbery, A cannot sue B for the proceeds.\n And the position would be the same if A were to vest property in B upon trust to carry out some fraudulent scheme A could not sue B for an account of the profits.\nBut if B, who is As agent or trustee, receives on As account money paid by C pursuant to an illegal contract between A and C the position is otherwise and A can recover the property from B, although he could not have claimed it from C.\nIn such cases public policy requires that the rule of turpis causa shall be excluded by the more important and imperative rule that agents and trustees must faithfully perform the duties of their office.\nWilliston in his Book on Contracts (revised edition), Vol. VI, has discussed this matter at p. 5069, para. 1785 and in paras. 1771 to 1774, he has noted certain exceptional cases, and has observed as follows If recovery is to be allowed by either partner or principal in any case, it must be where the illegality is of so light or venial a character that it is deemed more opposed to public policy to allow the defendant to violate his fiduciary relation with the plaintiff than to allow the plaintiff to gain the benefit of an illegal transaction.\nEven in India, certain exceptions to the rule of turpi causa have been accepted. Examples of those cases are found in Palaniyappa Chettiar v.\nChockalingam Chettiar (1920) I.L.R. 44 Mad. 334 and Bhola Nath v. Mul Chand (1903) I.L.R. 25 All. 639.\nThe respondents rely upon Farmers Mart Limited v. Milne 1915 A.C. 106, Alexander v.\nRayson 1936 1 K.B. 169, and Berg v. Sadler Moore 1937 2 K.B. 158, to show that this case falls within the rule accepted and applied in those cases.\nThe application of the rule is, however, conditioned by one thing, namely, that a plaintiff who is not allowed to succeed must be unable to sustain an action except upon the plea of the illegality committed by him.\nIn Lord Dunedins speech in Farmers Mart Limited v. Milne\nit was laid down that the test was whether a demand connected with an illegal transaction was capable of being enforced in law, and whether the plaintiff required any aid from the illegal transaction to establish his case.\nI think that this case may be determined on the short ground that the plaintiff is unable to establish his claim as stated upon the record, without relying upon the illegal agreement originally entered into between himself and the defendant.\nthe true test was by considering whether the plaintiff could make out his case otherwise than through the medium and by the aid of the illegal transaction to which he was himself a party.\nIn Alexander v. Rayson 1936 1 K.B. 169, it was held by the Court of Appeal that there was a locus poenitentiae but that the repentance must be before the fraud or illegality had been carried out.\nRecently, the Court of Appeal in Bowmakers Ltd. v. Barnet Instruments, Ltd. 1945 1 K.B. 65, reviewed the law on the subject, and laid down that every illegality did not entitle the Court to refuse a judgment to a plaintiff.\nIn our opinion, a mans right to possess his own chattels will as a general rule be enforced against one who, without any claim of right, is detaining them, or has converted them to his own use, even though it may appear either from the pleadings, or in the course of the trial, that the chattels in question came into the defendants possession by reason of an illegal contract between himself and the plaintiff, provided that the plaintiff does not seek, and is not forced, either to found his claim on the illegal contract or to plead its illegality in order to support his claim.\nThe law has been also considered by Pritchard, J., in Bigos v. Bousted\nThe correct position in law, in our opinion, is that what one has to see is whether the illegality goes so much to the root of the matter that the plaintiff cannot bring his action without relying upon the illegal transaction into which he had entered. If the illegality be trivial or venial, as stated by Williston and the plaintiff is not required to rest his case upon that illegality, then public policy demands that the defendant should not be allowed to take advantage of the position. A strict view, of course, must be taken of the plaintiffs conduct, and he should not be allowed to circumvent the illegality by resorting to some subterfuge or by mis-stating the facts.\nIf, however, the matters is clear and the illegality is not required to be pleaded or proved as part of the cause of action and the plaintiff recanted before the illegal purpose was achieved, then, unless it be of such a gross nature as to outrage the conscience of the Court, the plea of the defendant should not prevail.\nWe must remember that benami transactions are common in India, and have always been recognised. They are entered into for a variety of reasons, and the benamidar holds the property in trust for his principal.\nIn the present case, the object of the benami transaction was merely to keep the property from being resumed by the Bettiah Raj on the expiry of the lease in favour of Radhumal, which undoubtedly the Bettiah Raj could have done, if it had been so minded.\nThe information about the benami transaction was, however, not withheld from the Bettiah Raj, and even with that knowledge, the Bettiah Raj took no action against Radhumal or the benamidars.\nThe plaintiffs recanted inasmuch as they asserted their true title and true facts before the occasion for the Raj to act arose.\nThus, the fraud, though intended, was not perpetrated, because the fraud could only be effected at the end of the lease term, and the locus poenitentiae which the lessee possessed was duly used long before the expiry of the lease.\nThe illegality was also of a trivial character, inasmuch as the signatures of Prahlad Rai and others were made on the relative documents on the faith of their close friendship and relationship and under the assumption that no objection from them would proceed to the making of the application on their behalf and to the signing of the B.\nH. forms in their names.\nThe appellants were not required to prove this fact as part of their cause of action, and indeed, if the answering respondents are to be believed, they asserted as vehemently that the signatures were not forged but were their very own.\nIn establishing the benami nature of a transaction, the cardinal point to be proved is the source of money and this was done, and it was also established that Prahlad Rai and others were merely farzidars. To prove these things, it did not require the proof of the signatures.", + "expert_5": "the defendants were in possession of the suit lands as benamidars.\nthe consideration for the acquisition of these lands had proceeded from the predecessor of the plaintiffs, who had acquired them in the farzi names of Prahlad Rai, Gulraj Rai and Nawrang Rai.\nthe benamidars were related to Radhumal by marriage, and that Radhumal found it convenient to use their names.\nThese findings were accepted by the present respondents in the High Court.\naccording to the terms of the lease, ryoti lands taken in the names of the lessee or his relatives and servants were liable to be resumed by the Bettiah Raj after the termination of the lease, and that the benami transaction was entered into to avoid this contingency.\nBy the decisions of the two Courts below and the concession of the respondents, all questions of fact must be taken to be finally decided.\nNot to make any settlement of land with a raiyat or other tenant without the consent of the manager, and in any application for such consent to any settlement of land recorded as zirat or bakasht in the record of rights to state the reason of the lessee for wishing to make such settlement, and the area or zirat or bakasht land which would remain in the demised property after such settlement if it were made, and when it is proposed to make any settlement with a relative or servant of the lessee to state that fact and it is hereby declared that the manager shall be entitled as a condition of giving consent to any such settlement to require that an amount to be assessed by him shall be charged as a salami on any such settlement.\nNot to retain possession after the expiry of lease of any raiyati holdings or other interest in the leased property, acquired during the term of the lease whether by private purchase, purchase at auction sale, mortgage, sub-lease, surrender or otherwise, and any such holding or interest thus acquired will pass to the lessor,\nthe creation of a new tenancy by the Bettiah Raj after the expiry of the lease granted to Radhumal. We may point out that this aspect of the case was not pleaded by the answering respondents, and it is difficult to accept this case, which requires fresh evidence and material for a finding.\nIn view of these two facts, we must say, with respect, that the High Court was in error in constructing a new case for the respondents.\nIt is not open to a Court in appeal to consider media concludendi not pleaded by a party and to give judgment on their basis.\nThe maxim, in pari delicto etc., can hardly be made applicable in this context.\nNeither the appellants nor the respondents at any time pleaded that Prahlad Rai, Gulraj Rai and Nawrang Rai conspired to effect a fraud upon the Bettiah Raj.\nIn this respect, the cases of the appellants and the respondents are poles apart. While the appellants claim that Radhumal did not even consider it necessary to obtain the consent of these three persons and even did not obtain their signatures, the respondents claim that Radhumal had nothing whatever to do with the acquisition of these lands and had merely recommended them to the Bettiah Raj in his capacity as the lessee.\nWhere both parties do not show that there was any conspiracy to defraud a third person or to commit any other illegal act, the maxim, in pari delicto etc., can hardly be made applicable.\nThe appellants and the answering respondents were not in pari delicto.\nThe respondents claimed to be innocent parties, who had acquired the lands themselves, and the appellants, on the other hand, stated that the respondents knew nothing about the matter and were not even consulted.\nIn our opinion, the application of the maxim was erroneous.\nAfter the expiry of the lease, the Court of Wards did not enforce clause 16 in spite of this knowledge, and it therefore appears that the fraud was not effected, because the person or authority said to be defrauded knew all the facts, and elected not to take any action.\nIt has been held, however, that Radhumal paid the salami, a fact not now questioned.\nIn view of the fact that fraud cannot be said to have been effected, we do not think that the appellants who have clearly established the benami nature of the transactions can be deprived of their judgment.\npublic policy demands that where fraud might have been contemplated but was not perpetrated, the defendants should not be allowed to perpetrate a new fraud.\nIn making the application to the Bettiah Raj the signatures of Prahlad Rai and others were made by Radhumal or some one under his instructions, because the relationship between Radhumal, Prahlad Rai and others was so intimate that it was considered unnecessary to trouble them.\nbut the intention was not so much to forge the signatures but to present the application in the names of those persons\nThe law was stated as far back as 1775 by Lord Mansfield in Holman v. Johnson (1775) 1 Cowp. 341, 343 98 E.R. 1120, 1121, in the following words The principle of public policy is this ex dolo malo non oritur actio. No Court will lend its aid to a man who founds his cause of action upon an immoral or an illegal act. If, from the plaintiffs own stating or otherwise, the cause of action appears to arise ex turpi causa, or the transgression of a positive law of this country, there the Court says he has no right to be assisted. It is upon that ground the Court goes not for the sake of the defendant, but because they will not lend their aid to such a plaintiff. So if the plaintiff and defendant were to change sides, and the defendant was to bring his action against the plaintiff, the latter would then have the advantage of it for where both are equally in fault, potior est conditio defendentis.\nThere are, however, some exceptions or supposed exceptions to the rule of turpi causa.\nIn Salmond and William on Contracts, four such exceptions have been mentioned, and the fourth of these exceptions is based on the right of restitutio in integrum, where the relationship of trustee and beneficiary is involved.\nif B, who is As agent or trustee, receives on As account money paid by C pursuant to an illegal contract between A and C the position is otherwise and A can recover the property from B, although he could not have claimed it from C. In such cases public policy requires that the rule of turpis causa shall be excluded by the more important and imperative rule that agents and trustees must faithfully perform the duties of their office.\nIf recovery is to be allowed by either partner or principal in any case, it must be where the illegality is of so light or venial a character that it is deemed more opposed to public policy to allow the defendant to violate his fiduciary relation with the plaintiff than to allow the plaintiff to gain the benefit of an illegal transaction.\nEven in India, certain exceptions to the rule of turpi causa have been accepted.\nExamples of those cases are found in Palaniyappa Chettiar v. Chockalingam Chettiar (1920) I.L.R. 44 Mad. 334 and Bhola Nath v. Mul Chand (1903) I.L.R. 25 All. 639.\na plaintiff who is not allowed to succeed must be unable to sustain an action except upon the plea of the illegality committed by him.\nIn the first case, it was laid down that the test was whether a demand connected with an illegal transaction was capable of being enforced in law, and whether the plaintiff required any aid from the illegal transaction to establish his case.\nTindal, C.J., in the second case observed as follows I think that this case may be determined on the short ground that the plaintiff is unable to establish his claim as stated upon the record, without relying upon the illegal agreement originally entered into between himself and the defendant.\nIn the last case, Mellor, J., observed that the true test was by considering whether the plaintiff could make out his case otherwise than through the medium and by the aid of the illegal transaction to which he was himself a party.\nIn Alexander v. Rayson 1936 1 K.B. 169, it was held by the Court of Appeal that there was a locus poenitentiae but that the repentance must be before the fraud or illegality had been carried out.\nRecently, the Court of Appeal in Bowmakers Ltd. v. Barnet Instruments, Ltd. 1945 1 K.B. 65, reviewed the law on the subject, and laid down that every illegality did not entitle the Court to refuse a judgment to a plaintiff.\na mans right to possess his own chattels will as a general rule be enforced against one who, without any claim of right, is detaining them, or has converted them to his own use, even though it may appear either from the pleadings, or in the course of the trial, that the chattels in question came into the defendants possession by reason of an illegal contract between himself and the plaintiff\nprovided that the plaintiff does not seek, and is not forced, either to found his claim on the illegal contract or to plead its illegality in order to support his claim.\nThe correct position in law, in our opinion, is that what one has to see is whether the illegality goes so much to the root of the matter that the plaintiff cannot bring his action without relying upon the illegal transaction into which he had entered.\nIf the illegality be trivial or venial, as stated by Williston and the plaintiff is not required to rest his case upon that illegality, then public policy demands that the defendant should not be allowed to take advantage of the position.\nA strict view, of course, must be taken of the plaintiffs conduct, and he should not be allowed to circumvent the illegality by resorting to some subterfuge or by mis-stating the facts.\nIf, however, the matters is clear and the illegality is not required to be pleaded or proved as part of the cause of action and the plaintiff recanted before the illegal purpose was achieved, then, unless it be of such a gross nature as to outrage the conscience of the Court, the plea of the defendant should not prevail.\nbenami transactions are common in India, and have always been recognised.\nThey are entered into for a variety of reasons, and the benamidar holds the property in trust for his principal.\nthe benamidar holds the property in trust for his principal.\nIn the present case, the object of the benami transaction was merely to keep the property from being resumed by the Bettiah Raj on the expiry of the lease in favour of Radhumal, which undoubtedly the Bettiah Raj could have done, if it had been so minded.\nThe information about the benami transaction was, however, not withheld from the Bettiah Raj, and even with that knowledge, the Bettiah Raj took no action against Radhumal or the benamidars.\nThe plaintiffs recanted inasmuch as they asserted their true title and true facts before the occasion for the Raj to act arose.\nThus, the fraud, though intended, was not perpetrated, because the fraud could only be effected at the end of the lease term, and the locus poenitentiae which the lessee possessed was duly used long before the expiry of the lease.\nThe illegality was also of a trivial character, inasmuch as the signatures of Prahlad Rai and others were made on the relative documents on the faith of their close friendship and relationship and under the assumption that no objection from them would proceed to the making of the application on their behalf and to the signing of the B. H. forms in their names.\nThe appellants were not required to prove this fact as part of their cause of action, and indeed, if the answering respondents are to be believed, they asserted as vehemently that the signatures were not forged but were their very own.\nIn establishing the benami nature of a transaction, the cardinal point to be proved is the source of money and this was done, and it was also established that Prahlad Rai and others were merely farzidars." + }, + "1959_189": { + "expert_1": "Directed against the refusal by the High Court of Patna to require the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal to state a case and refer to it the question of law namely Whether under the facts and circumstances of the case, the amount of Rs. 1,30,785 being the excess of sale proceeds of the building, plant and machinery over the written down value of the business of the said newspapers publications could in law be termed to be income, profits and gains of the petitioner ?\nThe Income-tax Officer while assessing the appellants income for the assessment year 1950-51 was of the opinion that the appellant had sold to the private limited company these assets at an appreciated value and realised profits thereby and since the difference between the original cost and the written down value, namely Rs. 1,30,785, was less than the appreciated sale price of Rs. 2,06,343, the entire amount of Rs. 1,30,785 was income, profits or gains in the hands of the appellant liable to be assessed during the relevant assessment year, and assessed the same accordingly.\n Appeals filed by the appellant before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal failed with the result that the appellant applied to the Tribunal to state a case inter alia in connection with this particular question and an application was made by him under section 66(1) of the Indian Income- tax asking that the aforesaid question be referred to the High Court for its opinion. The Tribunal refused to refer that question and the appellant thereupon made an application to the High Court under section 66(2) of the Act requesting the High Court to direct the Tribunal to state a case and refer the said question amongst others for its decision.\n The High Court as stated above declined to do so, and hence this appeal.\nthe question whether the sum of Rs. 1,30,785 being the excess of the sale proceeds of the building, plant and machinery amounted to or could be deemed to be income, profits or gains of the appellant was a question of law and the High Court should have directed the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal to state a case and refer the said question to it for its decision.\nSuffice it to say that this contention raises a question of law which should have been referred to the High Court by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal for its decision, and when on the refusal of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal to state a case and to refer the said question to the High Court the appellant approached the High Court, the High Court should, in the exercise of its jurisdiction under section 66(2) of the Income-tax Act, have asked the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal to state a case and refer the said question to it for its decision.", + "expert_2": "The Income-tax Officer while assessing the appellants income for the assessment year 1950-51 was of the opinion that the appellant had sold to the private limited company these assets at an appreciated value and realised profits thereby and since the difference between the original cost and the written down value, namely Rs. 1,30,785, was less than the appreciated sale price of Rs. 2,06,343, the entire amount of Rs. 1,30,785 was income, profits or gains in the hands of the appellant liable to be assessed during the relevant assessment year, and assessed the same accordingly.\nThe Tribunal refused to refer that question and the appellant thereupon made an application to the High Court under section 66(2) of the Act requesting the High Court to direct the Tribunal to state a case and refer the said question amongst others for its decision.\nit was urged that the question whether there was a sale by the appellant to the newly floated private limited company which according to his submission was in no manner distinct and separate from the appellant himself and whether profits earned by the appellant in the matter of the said transaction of the transfer of the assets from himself as the proprietor to the newly floated private limited company as the transferee could be profits or gains in the real and commercial sense of the term was really a question of law and if regard be had to the observations of this court in the majority judgment in Kikabhai Premchand v. Commissioner of Income-tax that it was open to the court to lift the veil of corporate entity and look behind the same in order to see who were the real parties to the transaction, the present case would really come within the dictum that no man can make profit from himself.\nSuffice it to say that this contention raises a question of law which should have been referred to the High Court by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal for its decision, and when on the refusal of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal to state a case and to refer the said question to the High Court the appellant approached the High Court, the High Court should, in the exercise of its jurisdiction under section 66(2) of the Income-tax Act, have asked the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal to state a case and refer the said question to it for its decision.", + "expert_3": "Whether under the facts and circumstances of the case, the amount of Rs. 1,30,785 being the excess of sale proceeds of the building, plant and machinery over the written down value of the business of the said newspapers publications could in law be termed to be income, profits and gains of the petitioner\nThe appellant was the sole proprietor of the business which he carried on of publishing tow news-papers, namely The Indian National and Aryavart and which business had some assets. The Income-tax authorities had from time to time allowed to the appellant depreciation on the said assets for several years. In the accounting year 1356 Fasli corresponding to the assessment year 1950-1951, the appellant converted his said proprietary business into a private limited company.\n The entire capital of the newly-floated private limited company came out of the pocket of and was subscribed for by the appellant\nThe said newspapers publications and their assets were transferred from the sole proprietorship of the appellant to the newly floated private limited company of which the entire share capital was subscribed for and paid by the appellant. The appellant was allotted by way of consideration for the said transfer 25,000 shares of the said company out of which he held in his own name 24,950 share, the remaining 50 shares having been allotted at his instance to the names of his nominees by way of directors qualification shares. On the said transfer certain valuation was put on these assets\nThe written down value of the building as on the 30th September, 1948, was Rs. 29,669, the original cost thereof including the cost of subsequent additions being Rs. 49,270. The written down value of the machines and the plants as on the 30th September, 1948, was Rs. 1,19,368 as against the original cost thereof including subsequent additions which came to Rs. 2,30,552.\nThere was thus a difference of Rs. 1,30,785 which represented the total amount of depreciation which had been allowed by the Income-tax authorities on these assets up to that date. When the valuation was put on these assets for the purpose of the transfer, the valuation of the building with subsequent additions showed an appreciation of Rs. 54,599 and the appreciation in regard to the machinery and plant together with subsequent additions came to Rs. 1,51,744. The appreciated value of these assets therefore aggregated to Rs. 2,06,343 which was in excess of the depreciation amount already allowed namely, Rs. 1,30,785.\nThe Income-tax Officer while assessing the appellants income for the assessment year 1950-51 was of the opinion that the appellant had sold to the private limited company these assets at an appreciated value and realised profits thereby and since the difference between the original cost and the written down value, namely Rs. 1,30,785, was less than the appreciated sale price of Rs. 2,06,343, the entire amount of Rs. 1,30,785 was income, profits or gains in the hands of the appellant liable to be assessed during the relevant assessment year, and assessed the same accordingly\nAppeals filed by the appellant before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal failed with the result that the appellant applied to the Tribunal to state a case inter alia in connection with this particular question and an application was made by him under section 66(1) of the Indian Income- tax asking that the aforesaid question be referred to the High Court for its opinion. The Tribunal refused to refer that question and the appellant thereupon made an application to the High Court under section 66(2) of the Act requesting the High Court to direct the Tribunal to state a case and refer the said question amongst others for its decision.\n The High Court as stated above declined to do so, and hence this appeal\nSuffice it to say that this contention raises a question of law which should have been referred to the High Court by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal for its decision, and when on the refusal of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal to state a case and to refer the said question to the High Court the appellant approached the High Court, the High Court should, in the exercise of its jurisdiction under section 66(2) of the Income-tax Act, have asked the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal to state a case and refer the said question to it for its decision.", + "expert_4": "Directed against the refusal by the High Court of Patna to require the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal to state a case and refer to it the question of law namely Whether under the facts and circumstances of the case, the amount of Rs. 1,30,785 being the excess of sale proceeds of the building, plant and machinery over the written down value of the business of the said newspapers publications could in law be termed to be income, profits and gains of the petitioner ?\nThe appellant was the sole proprietor of the business which he carried on of publishing tow news-papers, namely The Indian National and Aryavart and which business had some assets.\nThe Income-tax authorities had from time to time allowed to the appellant depreciation on the said assets for several years.\nIn the accounting year 1356 Fasli corresponding to the assessment year 1950-1951, the appellant converted his said proprietary business into a private limited company.\n The entire capital of the newly-floated private limited company came out of the pocket of and was subscribed for by the appellant.\nThe said newspapers publications and their assets were transferred from the sole proprietorship of the appellant to the newly floated private limited company of which the entire share capital was subscribed for and paid by the appellant.\nOn the said transfer certain valuation was put on these assets.\nThe written down value of the building as on the 30th September, 1948, was Rs. 29,669, the original cost thereof including the cost of subsequent additions being Rs. 49,270.\nThe written down value of the machines and the plants as on the 30th September, 1948, was Rs. 1,19,368 as against the original cost thereof including subsequent additions which came to Rs. 2,30,552.\nThere was thus a difference of Rs. 1,30,785 which represented the total amount of depreciation which had been allowed by the Income-tax authorities on these assets up to that date.\nWhen the valuation was put on these assets for the purpose of the transfer, the valuation of the building with subsequent additions showed an appreciation of Rs. 54,599 and the appreciation in regard to the machinery and plant together with subsequent additions came to Rs. 1,51,744.\nThe appreciated value of these assets therefore aggregated to Rs. 2,06,343 which was in excess of the depreciation amount already allowed namely, Rs. 1,30,785.\nThe Income-tax Officer while assessing the appellants income for the assessment year 1950-51 was of the opinion that the appellant had sold to the private limited company these assets at an appreciated value and realised profits thereby and since the difference between the original cost and the written down value, namely Rs. 1,30,785, was less than the appreciated sale price of Rs. 2,06,343, the entire amount of Rs. 1,30,785 was income, profits or gains in the hands of the appellant liable to be assessed during the relevant assessment year, and assessed the same accordingly.\nAppeals filed by the appellant before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal failed with the result that the appellant applied to the Tribunal to state a case inter alia in connection with this particular question and an application was made by him under section 66(1) of the Indian Income- tax asking that the aforesaid question be referred to the High Court for its opinion.\nThe Tribunal refused to refer that question and the appellant thereupon made an application to the High Court under section 66(2) of the Act requesting the High Court to direct the Tribunal to state a case and refer the said question amongst others for its decision.\n The High Court as stated above declined to do so, and hence this appeal.\nMr. Kolah appearing on behalf of the appellant has urged before us that the question whether the sum of Rs. 1,30,785 being the excess of the sale proceeds of the building, plant and machinery amounted to or could be deemed to be income, profits or gains of the appellant was a question of law and the High Court should have directed the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal to state a case and refer the said question to it for its decision.\nReliance was placed by him on Doughty v. Commissioner of Taxes, Commissioner of Income-tax v.\nSir Homi Mehtas Executors, and Kikabhai Premchand v. Commissioner of Income-tax\nit was urged that the question whether there was a sale by the appellant to the newly floated private limited company which according to his submission was in no manner distinct and separate from the appellant himself and whether profits earned by the appellant in the matter of the said transaction of the transfer of the assets from himself as the proprietor to the newly floated private limited company as the transferee could be profits or gains in the real and commercial sense of the term was really a question of law and if regard be had to the observations of this court in the majority judgment in Kikabhai Premchand v. Commissioner of Income-tax that it was open to the court to lift the veil of corporate entity and look behind the same in order to see who were the real parties to the transaction, the present case would really come within the dictum that no man can make profit from himself.\nSuffice it to say that this contention raises a question of law which should have been referred to the High Court by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal for its decision, and when on the refusal of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal to state a case and to refer the said question to the High Court the appellant approached the High Court, the High Court should, in the exercise of its jurisdiction under section 66(2) of the Income-tax Act, have asked the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal to state a case and refer the said question to it for its decision.", + "expert_5": "Reliance was placed by him on Doughty v. Commissioner of Taxes, Commissioner of Income-tax v. Sir Homi Mehtas Executors, and Kikabhai Premchand v. Commissioner of Income-tax and it was urged that the question whether there was a sale by the appellant to the newly floated private limited company which according to his submission was in no manner distinct and separate from the appellant himself and whether profits earned by the appellant in the matter of the said transaction of the transfer of the assets from himself as the proprietor to the newly floated private limited company as the transferee could be profits or gains in the real and commercial sense of the term was really a question of law\nif regard be had to the observations of this court in the majority judgment in Kikabhai Premchand v. Commissioner of Income-tax that it was open to the court to lift the veil of corporate entity and look behind the same in order to see who were the real parties to the transaction, the present case would really come within the dictum that no man can make profit from himself.\nWe are at present not concerned to express any opinion on the merits of this contention.\nthis contention raises a question of law which should have been referred to the High Court by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal for its decision, and when on the refusal of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal to state a case and to refer the said question to the High Court the appellant approached the High Court, the High Court should, in the exercise of its jurisdiction under section 66(2) of the Income-tax Act, have asked the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal to state a case and refer the said question to it for its decision.\nThe question as it has been framed is not aptly worded." + }, + "1959_26": { + "expert_1": "The Income-tax Officer assessed these sums as taxable income holding that the entire amount of Rs. 40,504 was received in British India and not at Secunderabad. An appeal was taken by the respondents to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner who upheld the order holding that income must be held to have accrued, arisen or received in British India\nAgainst this order the respondents took an appeal to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal and it was held that the amounts were received by the respondents from Madura and Bombay firms as commission but they were received at Secunderabad. The appeal was therefore allowed. The finding Of the Appellate Tribunal in their own words was- The contention of the Appellants is that the cheques being negotiable instruments and the creditor having accepted them and passed through their books, II the receipt must be taken to be receipts in Hyderabad.\nWe agree with the view submitted by the appellants.\nThe real question in all such cases is not merely whether the cheques were drawn on a bank in British India, and sent for collection to that bank. The question is whether when the cheques were received by the assessee having his place of business outside British India, those cheques were in fact received as absolute and final payments by way of unconditional discharge or whether they were received as mere conditional payments on realisation. The fact that cheques were drawn on a bank in British India or that they were sent for collection through a Secunderabad banker of the assessee though relevant, are not conclusive .\nIt appears that at that stage the controversy was confined to the question whether the cheques having been sent to Secunderabad and having been realised in British India would amount to a final discharge or an unconditional one\nThe facts that such entries were made in the assessees books, that the cheques were put into the bank immediately, that the bank at once gave credit to the assessee for these sums after charging discount thereon and immediately allowed the assessee to operate on those sums are significant .\nTherefore the finding of fact by the Tribunal although not specific was that the receipt of the cheque by the respondents operated as full discharge of the debt due on account of commission from these two firms.\nThe question is whether the amounts, of commission paid by cheques, drawn respectively on banks at Madras and Bombay and respectively posted from Madura and Bombay, can in the circumstances of this case be held to have been received in what was British India or at Secunderabad ? The Appellate Tribunal found that all the cheques whether from Madura or from Bombay were sent by the two respective firms from Madura or Bombay and were received by the respondents at Secunderabad and were treated as payment. The question still remains as to the effect of the sending of the cheques from Madura or Bombay by post. If there is an express request by the (1) 1955 1 S. C. R. 185. creditor that the amount be paid by cheques to be sent by post and they are so sent there is no doubt that the payment will be taken to be at the place where the cheque or cheques are posted.\nThe respondents argued that there was an agreement between the Madura and Bombay firms and the respondents that the money would be paid whether in cash or by cheque at Secunderabad and therefore when the cheques were sent by post the post office was the agent of the debtor and not of the respondents. There is in support of the respondents an affidavit which was filed in the assessment proceedings and which was relied upon in the High Court. According to this affidavit it was verbally agreed that the commission would be paid at Secunderabad in cash or by cheque (as the case may be), the language used in the affidavit was The above commission was verbally decided to be paid to Messrs. Patney Co. Ltd., Secunderabad the Agent Company in Hyderabad State at Secunderabad in cash or by cheque as the case might be .\nIn the case of payment by cheques sent by post the determination of the place of payment would depend upon the agreement between the parties or the course of conduct of the parties. If it is shown that the creditor authorised the debtor either expressly or impliedly to send a cheque by post the property in the cheque passes to the creditor as soon as it is posted.\n Therefore the post office is an agent of the person to whom the cheque is posted if there be an express or implied authority to send it by post (Commissioner of Income-tax v. Ogale Glass Works Ltd. (1)). In that case there was an express request of the assessee to remit the amount of the bills outstanding against the debtor, that is, Government of India by means of cheques. But it was observed by this Court that according to the course of business usage in general which has to be considered as a part of the surrounding circumstances the parties must have intended that the cheques should be sent by post which is the usual and normal mode of transmission and therefore the posting of cheques in Delhi amounted to payment in (1) 1955 1 S.C.R. 185. Delhi to the post office which was constituted the agent of the assessee.\nBut it was argued for the respondents that in the absence of such a request the post office could not be constituted as the agent of the creditor and relied on a passage in Ogales case (1) at p. 204 where it was observed- Of course if there be no such request, express or implied, then the delivery of the letter or the cheque to the post office is delivery to the agent of the sender himself . It was further contended that in this case there was an express agreement that the payment was to be made at Secunderabad and therefore the matter does not fall within the rule in Ogale Glass Works case (1) and the following principle laid down in judgment by Das, J. (as he then was), is inapplicable\nApplying the above principles to the facts found by the Tribunal the position appears to be this. The engagement of the Government was to make payment by cheques. The cheques were drawn in Delhi and received by the assessee in Aundh by post.", + "expert_2": "The respondents at all material times were non-residents carrying on business at Secunderabad which was then in the territories of the Nizam of Hyderabad. They acted as agents for the supply of gas plants manufactured by Messrs. T. V. S. Iyengar Sons, Madura, to the Nizams Government, and also as agents of the Lucas Indian Services, Bombay branch, for the supply of certain goods to that Government.\nIn pursuance of this agreement the respondents received from M s. T.V.S. lyengar Sons, Madura, cheques drawn on the Imperial Bank of India, Madras, amounting to Rs. 35,202 in respect of all goods supplied from -Madura and also from Lucas Indian Services, Bombay, by cheques drawn on Imperial Bank of India, Bombay branch, amounting to Rs. 5,302 in respect of goods supplied by them, thus making a total of Rs. 40,504. These cheques were sent by post and when received by the respondents at Secunderabad were credited in the account books of the respondents and sent to their banker G. Raghunathmal for collecting and crediting to the account of the respondents.\nThe real question in all such cases is not merely whether the cheques were drawn on a bank in British India, and sent for collection to that bank. The question is whether when the cheques were received by the assessee having his place of business outside British India, those cheques were in fact received as absolute and final payments by way of unconditional discharge or whether they were received as mere conditional payments on realisation.\nCourt had given a judgment in Commissioner of Income-tax v. Ogale Glass Works Ltd (1). Even after considering the decision of that case the High Court was of the opinion that the income of the respondents was not received in British India and answered the question against the Revenue.\n The High Court refused to give leave to appeal to this Court and it was this Court which gave special leave to appeal. The question is whether the amounts, of commission paid by cheques, drawn respectively on banks at Madras and Bombay and respectively posted from Madura and Bombay, can in the circumstances of this case be held to have been received in what was British India or at Secunderabad ? The Appellate Tribunal found that all the cheques whether from Madura or from Bombay were sent by the two respective firms from Madura or Bombay and were received by the respondents at Secunderabad and were treated as payment.\nthe amount be paid by cheques to be sent by post and they are so sent there is no doubt that the payment will be taken to be at the place where the cheque or cheques are posted. The respondents argued that there was an agreement between the Madura and Bombay firms and the respondents that the money would be paid whether in cash or by cheque at Secunderabad and therefore when the cheques were sent by post the post office was the agent of the debtor and not of the respondents.\nIn the case of payment by cheques sent by post the determination of the place of payment would depend upon the agreement between the parties or the course of conduct of the parties. If it is shown that the creditor authorised the debtor either expressly or impliedly to send a cheque by post the property in the cheque passes to the creditor as soon as it is posted.\n Therefore the post office is an agent of the person to whom the cheque is posted if there be an express or implied authority to send it by post", + "expert_3": "The respondents at all material times were non-residents carrying on business at Secunderabad which was then in the territories of the Nizam of Hyderabad. They acted as agents for the supply of gas plants manufactured by Messrs. T. V. S. Iyengar Sons, Madura, to the Nizams Government, and also as agents of the Lucas Indian Services, Bombay branch, for the supply of certain goods to that Government.\nThe year of assessment is 1945-46\nThere does not appear to have been any written agreement between the two manufacturers and the respondents but the goods were to be supplied on a commission basis. In pursuance of this agreement the respondents received from M s. T.V.S. lyengar Sons, Madura, cheques drawn on the Imperial Bank of India, Madras, amounting to Rs. 35,202 in respect of all goods supplied from -Madura and also from Lucas Indian Services, Bombay, by cheques drawn on Imperial Bank of India, Bombay branch, amounting to Rs. 5,302 in respect of goods supplied by them, thus making a total of Rs. 40,504. These cheques were sent by post and when received by the respondents at Secunderabad were credited in the account books of the respondents and sent to their banker\nfor collecting and crediting to the account of the respondents\nAs against these sums so deposited the respondents at once drew cheques and thus operated on these amounts deposited. In regard to the commission received from the Bombay firm it was paid into the account on December 22, 1944, but was given credit for only on January 2, 1945\nThe Income-tax Officer assessed these sums as taxable income holding that the entire amount of Rs. 40,504 was received in British India and not at Secunderabad. An appeal was taken by the respondents to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner who upheld the order holding that income must be held to have accrued, arisen or received in British India.\n Against this order the respondents took an appeal to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal and it was held that the amounts were received by the respondents from Madura and Bombay firms as commission but they were received at Secunderabad\nit is stated that it will be open to a creditor to accept a cheque in absolute payment of money due to him, in which case it will be equivalent to cash payment. That being the position it cannot be said that the income was received in British India .\nAt the instance of the Commissioner a reference under s. 66(1) of the Act was made to the High Court of Orissa for their opinion on the following question - Whether in the circumstances of the case, the sums of Rs. 35,202 and Rs. 5,302 received as commission from T. V. S. lyengar Sons Ltd., and Lucas Indian Services Ltd., respectively were income that accrued, arose or were received in British India\nThe High Court found that the statement of case was imperfect and that the real question was different. It said The real question in all such cases is not merely whether the cheques were drawn on a bank in British India, and sent for collection to that bank\nThe question is whether when the cheques were received by the assessee having his place of business outside British India, those cheques were in fact received as absolute and final payments by way of unconditional discharge or whether they were received as mere conditional payments on realisation. The fact that cheques were drawn on a bank in British India or that they were sent for collection through a Secunderabad banker of the assessee though relevant, are not conclusive .\nIt appears that at that stage the controversy was confined to the question whether the cheques having been sent to Secunderabad and having been realised in British India would amount to a final discharge or an unconditional one. The Tribunal in its supplementary statement found that the course of conduct followed by the parties showed that the cheques were received from the Bombay and Madura firms in full satisfaction of the commission ascertained from time to time and due on such date\nTherefore the finding of fact by the Tribunal although not specific was that the receipt of the cheque by the respondents operated as full discharge of the debt due on account of commission from these two firms. The matter was decided by the High Court against the appellant\nHigh Court was of the opinion that the income of the respondents was not received in British India and answered the question against the Revenue.\n The High Court refused to give leave to appeal to this Court and it was this Court which gave special leave to appeal.\nThe question is whether the amounts, of commission paid by cheques, drawn respectively on banks at Madras and Bombay and respectively posted from Madura and Bombay, can in the circumstances of this case be held to have been received in what was British India or at Secunderabad ?\nThe Appellate Tribunal found that all the cheques whether from Madura or from Bombay were sent by the two respective firms from Madura or Bombay and were received by the respondents at Secunderabad and were treated as payment. The question still remains as to the effect of the sending of the cheques from Madura or Bombay by post\nIf there is an express request by the (1) 1955 1 S. C. R. 185. creditor that the amount be paid by cheques to be sent by post and they are so sent there is no doubt that the payment will be taken to be at the place where the cheque or cheques are posted\nThere is in support of the respondents an affidavit which was filed in the assessment proceedings and which was relied upon in the High Court. According to this affidavit it was verbally agreed that the commission would be paid at Secunderabad in cash or by cheque (as the case may be), the language used in the affidavit was The above commission was verbally decided to be paid to Messrs. Patney Co. Ltd., Secunderabad the Agent Company in Hyderabad State at Secunderabad in cash or by cheque as the case might be\nIn the case of payment by cheques sent by post the determination of the place of payment would depend upon the agreement between the parties or the course of conduct of the parties\nIf it is shown that the creditor authorised the debtor either expressly or impliedly to send a cheque by post the property in the cheque passes to the creditor as soon as it is posted.\n Therefore the post office is an agent of the person to whom the cheque is posted if there be an express or implied authority to send it by post\naccording to the course of business usage in general which has to be considered as a part of the surrounding circumstances the parties must have intended that the cheques should be sent by post which is the usual and normal mode of transmission and therefore the posting of cheques in Delhi amounted to payment\nBut it was argued for the respondents that in the absence of such a request the post office could not be constituted as the agent of the creditor and relied on a passage in Ogales case (1) at p. 204 where it was observed- Of course if there be no such request, express or implied, then the delivery of the letter or the cheque to the post office is delivery to the agent of the sender himself . It was further contended that in this case there was an express agreement that the payment was to be made at Secunderabad and therefore the matter does not fall within the rule in Ogale Glass Works case (1) and the following principle laid down in judgment by Das, J. (as he then was), is inapplicable", + "expert_4": "The respondents at all material times were non-residents carrying on business at Secunderabad which was then in the territories of the Nizam of Hyderabad.\nThey acted as agents for the supply of gas plants manufactured by Messrs.\nT. V. S. Iyengar Sons, Madura, to the Nizams Government, and also as agents of the Lucas Indian Services, Bombay branch, for the supply of certain goods to that Government.\nThere does not appear to have been any written agreement between the two manufacturers and the respondents but the goods were to be supplied on a commission basis.\nIn pursuance of this agreement the respondents received from M s. T.V.S. lyengar Sons, Madura, cheques drawn on the Imperial Bank of India, Madras, amounting to Rs. 35,202 in respect of all goods supplied from -Madura and also from Lucas Indian Services, Bombay, by cheques drawn on Imperial Bank of India, Bombay branch, amounting to Rs. 5,302 in respect of goods supplied by them, thus making a total of Rs. 40,504.\nThe Income-tax Officer assessed these sums as taxable income holding that the entire amount of Rs. 40,504 was received in British India and not at Secunderabad.\nAn appeal was taken by the respondents to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner who upheld the order holding that income must be held to have accrued, arisen or received in British India.\nAgainst this order the respondents took an appeal to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal and it was held that the amounts were received by the respondents from Madura and Bombay firms as commission but they were received at Secunderabad. The appeal was therefore allowed.\nThe finding Of the Appellate Tribunal in their own words was- The contention of the Appellants is that the cheques being negotiable instruments and the creditor having accepted them and passed through their books, II the receipt must be taken to be receipts in Hyderabad.\nWe agree with the view submitted by the appellants.\nIn Bhashyams Negotiable Instruments Act, 8th Edition, Revised, page 556, it is stated that it will be open to a creditor to accept a cheque in absolute payment of money due to him, in which case it will be equivalent to cash payment. That being the position it cannot be said that the income was received in British India .\nAt the instance of the Commissioner a reference under s. 66(1) of the Act was made to the High Court of Orissa for their opinion on the following question - Whether in the circumstances of the case, the sums of Rs. 35,202 and Rs. 5,302 received as commission from T. V.\nS. lyengar Sons Ltd., and Lucas Indian Services Ltd., respectively were income that accrued, arose or were received in British India .\nThe High Court found that the statement of case was imperfect and that the real question was different.\nThe question is whether when the cheques were received by the assessee having his place of business outside British India, those cheques were in fact received as absolute and final payments by way of unconditional discharge or whether they were received as mere conditional payments on realisation.\nThe fact that cheques were drawn on a bank in British India or that they were sent for collection through a Secunderabad banker of the assessee though relevant, are not conclusive .\nIt therefore remitted the case to the Appellate Tribunal for submission of supplementary statement of case.\nThe Tribunal in its supplementary statement found that the course of conduct followed by the parties showed that the cheques were received from the Bombay and Madura firms in full satisfaction of the commission ascertained from time to time and due on such date. It said The facts that such entries were made in the assessees books, that the cheques were put into the bank immediately, that the bank at once gave credit to the assessee for these sums after charging discount thereon and immediately allowed the assessee to operate on those sums are significant .\nThe matter was decided by the High Court against the appellant and in the meanwhile this Court had given a judgment in Commissioner of Income-tax v.\nOgale Glass Works Ltd (1).\nEven after considering the decision of that case the High Court was of the opinion that the income of the respondents was not received in British India and answered the question against the Revenue.\nThe question is whether the amounts, of commission paid by cheques, drawn respectively on banks at Madras and Bombay and respectively posted from Madura and Bombay, can in the circumstances of this case be held to have been received in what was British India or at Secunderabad ?\nThe Appellate Tribunal found that all the cheques whether from Madura or from Bombay were sent by the two respective firms from Madura or Bombay and were received by the respondents at Secunderabad and were treated as payment.\nThe question still remains as to the effect of the sending of the cheques from Madura or Bombay by post.\nIf there is an express request by the (1) 1955 1 S. C. R. 185. creditor that the amount be paid by cheques to be sent by post and they are so sent there is no doubt that the payment will be taken to be at the place where the cheque or cheques are posted.\nThe respondents argued that there was an agreement between the Madura and Bombay firms and the respondents that the money would be paid whether in cash or by cheque at Secunderabad and therefore when the cheques were sent by post the post office was the agent of the debtor and not of the respondents.\nAccording to this affidavit it was verbally agreed that the commission would be paid at Secunderabad in cash or by cheque (as the case may be), the language used in the affidavit was The above commission was verbally decided to be paid to Messrs. Patney Co.\nLtd., Secunderabad the Agent Company in Hyderabad State at Secunderabad in cash or by cheque as the case might be .\nIn the case of payment by cheques sent by post the determination of the place of payment would depend upon the agreement between the parties or the course of conduct of the parties.\nIf it is shown that the creditor authorised the debtor either expressly or impliedly to send a cheque by post the property in the cheque passes to the creditor as soon as it is posted.\n Therefore the post office is an agent of the person to whom the cheque is posted if there be an express or implied authority to send it by post (Commissioner of Income-tax v. Ogale Glass Works Ltd. (1)).\nBut it was observed by this Court that according to the course of business usage in general which has to be considered as a part of the surrounding circumstances the parties must have intended that the cheques should be sent by post which is the usual and normal mode of transmission and therefore the posting of cheques in Delhi amounted to payment in (1) 1955 1 S.C.R. 185.\nDelhi to the post office which was constituted the agent of the assessee.\nIt was further contended that in this case there was an express agreement that the payment was to be made at Secunderabad and therefore the matter does not fall within the rule in Ogale Glass Works case (1) and the following principle laid down in judgment by Das, J.\nis inapplicable - Applying the above principles to the facts found by the Tribunal the position appears to be this.\nThe engagement of the Government was to make payment by cheques. The cheques were drawn in Delhi and received by the assessee in Aundh by post.", + "expert_5": "The Appellate Tribunal found that all the cheques whether from Madura or from Bombay were sent by the two respective firms from Madura or Bombay and were received by the respondents at Secunderabad and were treated as payment.\nIf there is an express request by the (1) 1955 1 S. C. R. 185. creditor that the amount be paid by cheques to be sent by post and they are so sent there is no doubt that the payment will be taken to be at the place where the cheque or cheques are posted.\nAccording to this affidavit it was verbally agreed that the commission would be paid at Secunderabad in cash or by cheque (as the case may be), the language used in the affidavit was The above commission was verbally decided to be paid to Messrs. Patney Co. Ltd., Secunderabad the Agent Company in Hyderabad State at Secunderabad in cash or by cheque as the case might be .\nIn the case of payment by cheques sent by post the determination of the place of payment would depend upon the agreement between the parties or the course of conduct of the parties.\nIf it is shown that the creditor authorised the debtor either expressly or impliedly to send a cheque by post the property in the cheque passes to the creditor as soon as it is posted.\n Therefore the post office is an agent of the person to whom the cheque is posted if there be an express or implied authority to send it by post (Commissioner of Income-tax v. Ogale Glass Works Ltd. (1)).\nexpress request of the assessee\naccording to the course of business usage in general which has to be considered as a part of the surrounding circumstances the parties must have intended that the cheques should be sent by post which is the usual and normal mode of transmission and therefore the posting of cheques in Delhi amounted to payment in (1) 1955 1 S.C.R. 185. Delhi to the post office which was constituted the agent of the assessee.\nOf course if there be no such request, express or implied, then the delivery of the letter or the cheque to the post office is delivery to the agent of the sender himself .\nin this case there was an express agreement that the payment was to be made at Secunderabad" + }, + "1959_5": { + "expert_1": "The shares in respect of which this dividend income was received were the property of the Applicant but in the books of the various companies these stood in the names of other persons. It appears that these shares were purchased by the Applicant from other persons under a blank transfer but the transfers had not been registered with the various companies.\nThe Applicants claim in these income-tax proceedings was that these shares although not registered in the name of the applicant were the property of the applicant. It was further claimed that this dividend income should be grossed up under s. 16(2) and credit for the tax deducted should be allowed to the Applicant under s. 18(5). The Income-tax Officer did not accept this claim, and the appeals of the assessee were rejected by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Calcutta, A Range and by the Appellate Tribunal.\nThe Tribunal, however, on being moved, referred the following question to the High Court Whether in the facts and circumstances of this case, the Applicant (the assessee) was entitled to have this dividend income grossed up under section 16(2) and claim credit for tax deducted at source under section 18(5) of the Income-tax Act? The High Court answered the question in the negative, thus affirming the decisions of the Department and the Appellate Tribunal.\nThe assessee contends that the decision of the High Court is erroneous, and that it is entitled to have the dividend income I grossed up under s. 16(2) and also to claim credit for tax deducted at source, under s.18(5) of the Income-tax Act.\nIn the opinion of the High Court, an assessee whose name was not in the register of members of the companies was not entitled to the benefit of these provisions.\n The learned Judges of the High Court were of the opinion that the word shareholder in s.18(5) had the same signification as the word member used in the Indian Companies Act and that the assessee was not qualified to be considered as a shareholder, even though by a blank transfer it had ,purchased the relevant shares. In our opinion, the High Court was right in its conclusion. A company when it pays income-tax, does not do so on behalf of the shareholders. It is itself chargeable under the Act\na company paying income-tax on its profits does not pay it as agent for its shareholders. It pays as a tax- payer, and if no dividend is declared, the shareholders have no direct concern in the payment. If a dividend is declared, -the company is entitled to deduct from such dividend a proportionate part of the amount of the tax previously paid by the company and, in that case, the payment by the company operates in relief of the shareholder. But no agency, properly so called, is involved. The share-holders, however, get the benefit of the payment of the tax by the company.\nThough under (1) 1940 A.C. 51, 56 (1939) 22 Tax Cas. 603, 636. (2) 1921 2 A.C. 171, 201. s.16(2) of the Act their dividend is increased by a proportionate amount of tax paid by the company, the payment of the tax by the company is deemed tinder ss. 18(5) and 49B(1) to be payment by the shareholders. The rates of income-tax applicable to the company are, in most instances, higher than the rates applicable to the individual shareholders, and by this process of grossing up, as it is commonly called, the recipient of the dividend gets some benefit. The position of a shareholder who gets dividend when his name stands in the register of members of the company causes no difficulty whatever. But transfers of shares are common, and they take place either by a fully executed document such as was contemplated by Regulation 18 of Table A of the Indian Companies Act 1913, or by what are known as blank transfers. In such blank transfers, the name of the transferor is entered, and the transfer deed signed by the transferor is handed over with the share scrip to the trans- feree, who, if he so chooses, completes the transfer by entering his name and then applying to the company to register his name in place of the previous holder of the share. The company recognises no person except one whose name is on the register of members, upon whom alone calls for unpaid capital can be made and to whom only the dividend declared by the company is legally payable.\n Of course, between the transferor and the transferee, certain equities arise even on the execution and handing over of a blank transfer, and among these equities is the right of the transferee to claim the dividend declared and paid to the transferor who is treated as a trustee on behalf of the transferee.\nA glance at the scheme of the Indian Companies Act, 1913, shows that the words member , shareholder and holder of a share have been used interchangeably in that Act.\n Indeed, the opinion of most of the writers on the subject is also the same.\nThe words holder of a share are really equal to the word shareholder and the expression holder of a share denotes, in so far as the company is concerned, only a person who, as a shareholder, has his name entered on the register of members.\nTherefore the transferor, until the delivery of the deed of transfer to the secretary, is subject to all the liabilities and entitled to all the rights which belong to a shareholder or stockholder, and, in my opinion until the requisite formalities are complied with, he continues the legal -proprietor of the stock or shares subject to that proprietorship being divested, which it may be at any moment, by a compliance with the requisite formalities. (1) (1888) 37 Ch. D. 346, 356.\n The same position obtains in India, though the completion of the transaction by having the name entered in the register of members relates it back to the time when the transfer was first made.\nDuring the period that the transfer exists between the transferor and the transferee without emerging as a binding document upon the company, equities exist between them, but not between the transferee and the company. The transferee can call upon the transferor to attend the meeting, vote according to his directions, sign documents in relation to the issuance of fresh capital, call for emergent meetings and inter alia, also compel the transferor to pay such dividend as he may have received.\nBut these rights though they, no doubt, clothe the transferee with an equitable ownership-, are not sufficient to make the transferee a full owner, since the legal interest vis-a-vis the company still outstands in the transferor so much so, that the company credits the dividends only to the transferor and also calls upon him to make payment of any unpaid capital, which may be needed.\nThe position, therefore, under the Indian Com- panies Act, 1913, is quite clear that the expression shareholder or holder of a share in so far as that Act is concerned, denotes no other person except a member .\nThe assessee contends that the word shareholder includes even a person who holds a share as a result of a blank transfer, and does not necessarily mean a member of the company, whose name is on the register of members. Authorities on this point are not wanting, and indeed, in the judgment of the Calcutta High Court they have all been referred to. They are all against the assessee.\nThe question that falls for consideration is whether the meaning given to the expression shareholder used in s. 18(5) of the Act by these cases is correct. No valid reason exists why shareholder as used in s. 18(5) should mean a person other than the one denoted by the same expression in the Indian Companies Act, 1913.\nNo one can doubt the correctness of the proposition in these cases, but from an equitable right to compel the transferor to give up the dividend to the transferee, to a claim to the dividend by him as a shareholder against the company is a wide jump. In so far as the company is concerned, it does not even issue the certificate under s. 20 of the Income-tax Act in the name of an unregistered transferee but only in the name of the transferor whom it recognises, because his name is borne on its books.\nThe meaning of s. 20 as also of s. 18(5) is clear if they are read with s. 19A, under which information regarding dividends has to be supplied by the company when demanded by the Income-tax Officer.\n It lays down The principal officer of every company shall, on or before the 15th day of June in each year, furnish to the prescribed officer a return in the prescribed form and verified in the prescribed manner of the names and of the addresses, as entered in the register of shareholders maintained by the company, of the shareholders to whom a dividend or aggregate dividends exceeding Such amount as may be prescribed in this behalf has or have been, distributed during the, preceding year and of the amount so distributed to each such shareholder. (Italics supplied). Section 19A makes it clear, if any doubt existed, that by the term shareholder is meant the person whose name and address are entered in the register of shareholders maintained by the company. There is but one register maintained by the Company. There (1) (1945) 26 Tax Cas. 359. is no separate register of shareholders such as the assessee claims to be but only a register of members . This takes us immediately to the register of members, and demonstrates that even for the purpose of the Indian Income- tax Act, the words ,member and shareholder can be read as synonymous.\nThe words of s. 18(5) must accordingly be read in the light in which the word shareholder has been used in the subsequent sections, and read in that manner, the present assessee, notwithstanding the equitable right to the dividend, was not entitled to be regarded as a shareholder for the purpose of s. 18(5) of the Act.", + "expert_2": "The applicant had received sums of Rs. 3,831, Rs. 6,606, Rs. 7,954 and Rs. 8,304 in the four assessment years, 1944- 45, 1945-46, 1946-47 and 1947-48 as income from dividends. The shares in respect of which this dividend income was received were the property of the Applicant but in the books of the various companies these stood in the names of other persons. It appears that these shares were purchased by the Applicant from other persons under a blank transfer but the transfers had not been registered with the various companies. The Applicants claim in these income-tax proceedings was that these shares although not registered in the name of the applicant were the property of the applicant. It was further claimed that this dividend income should be grossed up under s. 16(2) and credit for the tax deducted should be allowed to the Applicant under s. 18(5).\nIn the opinion of the High Court, an assessee whose name was not in the register of members of the companies was not entitled to the benefit of these provisions.\n The learned Judges of the High Court were of the opinion that the word shareholder in s.18(5) had the same signification as the word member used in the Indian Companies Act and that the assessee was not qualified to be considered as a shareholder, even though by a blank transfer it had ,purchased the relevant shares. In our opinion, the High Court was right in its conclusion.\nThe position of a shareholder who gets dividend when his name stands in the register of members of the company causes no difficulty whatever. But transfers of shares are common, and they take place either by a fully executed document such as was contemplated by Regulation 18 of Table A of the Indian Companies Act 1913, or by what are known as blank transfers. In such blank transfers, the name of the transferor is entered, and the transfer deed signed by the transferor is handed over with the share scrip to the trans- feree, who, if he so chooses, completes the transfer by entering his name and then applying to the company to register his name in place of the previous holder of the share. The company recognises no person except one whose name is on the register of members, upon whom alone calls for unpaid capital can be made and to whom only the dividend declared by the company is legally payable.\nThe position, therefore, under the Indian Com- panies Act, 1913, is quite clear that the expression shareholder or holder of a share in so far as that Act is concerned, denotes no other person except a member . The question that arises in the present case is whether by reason of ss. 16(2) and 18(5) the assessee, who was a transferee on a blank transfer is entitled to the benefits of the grossing up of the dividend income.\nThe assessee contends that the word shareholder includes even a person who holds a share as a result of a blank transfer, and does not necessarily mean a member of the company, whose name is on the register of members.\nIn so far as the company is concerned, it does not even issue the certificate under s. 20 of the Income-tax Act in the name of an unregistered transferee but only in the name of the transferor whom it recognises, because his name is borne on its books.\nSection 20 lays down The principal officer of every company shall, at the time of distribution of dividends, furnish to every person receiving a dividend a certificate to the effect that the company has paid or will pay income-tax on the profits which are being distributed, and specifying such other particulars as may be prescribed. The meaning of s. 20 as also of s. 18(5) is clear if they are read with s. 19A, under which information regarding dividends has to be supplied by the company when demanded by the Income-tax Officer.\nThe principal officer of every company shall, on or before the 15th day of June in each year, furnish to the prescribed officer a return in the prescribed form and verified in the prescribed manner of the names and of the addresses, as entered in the register of shareholders maintained by the company, of the shareholders to whom a dividend or aggregate dividends exceeding Such amount as may be prescribed in this behalf has or have been, distributed during the, preceding year and of the amount so distributed to each such shareholder.\nSection 19A makes it clear, if any doubt existed, that by the term shareholder is meant the person whose name and address are entered in the register of shareholders maintained by the company. There is but one register maintained by the Company. There (1) (1945) 26 Tax Cas. 359. is no separate register of shareholders such as the assessee claims to be but only a register of members . This takes us immediately to the register of members, and demonstrates that even for the purpose of the Indian Income- tax Act, the words ,member and shareholder can be read as synonymous. The words of s. 18(5) must accordingly be read in the light in which the word shareholder has been used in the subsequent sections, and read in that manner, the present assessee, notwithstanding the equitable right to the dividend, was not entitled to be regarded as a shareholder for the purpose of s. 18(5) of the Act.", + "expert_3": "The applicant had received sums of Rs. 3,831, Rs. 6,606, Rs. 7,954 and Rs. 8,304 in the four assessment years, 1944- 45, 1945-46, 1946-47 and 1947-48 as income from dividends. The shares in respect of which this dividend income was received were the property of the Applicant but in the books of the various companies these stood in the names of other persons.\nIt appears that these shares were purchased by the Applicant from other persons under a blank transfer but the transfers had not been registered with the various companies. The Applicants claim in these income-tax proceedings was that these shares although not registered in the name of the applicant were the property of the applicant. It was further claimed that this dividend income should be grossed up under s. 16(2) and credit for the tax deducted should be allowed to the Applicant under s. 18(5).\nThe Income-tax Officer did not accept this claim, and the appeals of the assessee were rejected by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Calcutta, A Range and by the Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal, however, on being moved, referred the following question to the High Court Whether in the facts and circumstances of this case, the Applicant (the assessee) was entitled to have this dividend income grossed up under section 16(2) and claim credit for tax deducted at source under section 18(5) of the Income-tax Act? The High Court answered the question in the negative, thus affirming the decisions of the Department and the Appellate Tribunal\nThe assessee contends that the decision of the High Court is erroneous, and that it is entitled to have the dividend income I grossed up under s. 16(2) and also to claim credit for tax deducted at source, under s.18(5) of the Income-tax Act\nThe relevant sections are as follows 16(2) For the purposes of inclusion in the total income of an assessee any dividend shall be deemed to be income of the previous year in which it is paid, credited or distributed or deemed to have been paid, credited or distributed to him, and shall be increased to such amount as would, if income-tax (but not super-tax) at the rate applicable to the total income of the company without taking into account any rebate allowed or additional income-tax charged for the financial year in which the dividend is paid, credited or distributed or deemed to have been paid, credited or distributed, were deducted therefrom, be equal to the amount of the dividend (proviso omitted). 18 (5) Any deduction made and paid to the account of the Central Government in accordance with the provisions of this section and any sum by which a dividend has been increased under sub-section (2) of section 16 shall be treated as a payment of incometax or super-tax on behalf of the shareholder and credit shall be given to him therefor on the production of the certificate furnished undersection 20 in the assessment, if any, made for the following year under this Act (proviso omitted). 49B(1) Where any dividend has been paid, credited or distributed or is deemed to have been paid, credited or distributed to any of the persons specified in section 3 who is a shareholder of a company which is assessed to income- tax in the taxable territories or elsewhere, such person shall, if the dividend is included in his total income, be deemed in respect of such dividend himself to have paid income-tax (exclusive of super-tax) of an amount equal to the sum by which the dividend has been increased under sub- section (2) of section 16\nIt was contended in the High Court that inasmuch as s. 16(2) referred to an I assessee, the assessee company was entitled to have the dividend grossed up by the addition of income- tax paid by the various companies at source and consequently to have the benefit of the credit allowed under the two remaining sections. In the opinion of the High Court, an assessee whose name was not in the register of members of the companies was not entitled to the benefit of these provisions.\n The learned Judges of the High Court were of the opinion that the word shareholder in s.18(5) had the same signification as the word member used in the Indian Companies Act and that the assessee was not qualified to be considered as a shareholder, even though by a blank transfer it had ,purchased the relevant shares\nIn our opinion, the High Court was right in its conclusion. A company when it pays income-tax, does not do so on behalf of the shareholders\nIt is itself chargeable under the Act\nin the case of a limited company the company itself is chargeable to tax on its profits, and that it pays tax in discharge of its own liability and not as agent for its shareholders At one time it was thought that the company, in paying tax, paid on behalf of the shareholder but this theory is now exploded by decisions in this House, and the position of the shareholders as to tax is as I have stated it. When the company pays its own income-tax and declares a dividend from the balance of its profits, it deducts from such dividend a proportionate part of the amount of the tax paid by it\na company paying income-tax on its profits does not pay it as agent for its shareholders\nIt pays as a tax- payer, and if no dividend is declared, the shareholders have no direct concern in the payment. If a dividend is declared, -the company is entitled to deduct from such dividend a proportionate part of the amount of the tax previously paid by the company and, in that case, the payment by the company operates in relief of the shareholder. But no agency, properly so called, is involved. The share-holders, however, get the benefit of the payment of the tax by the company\nThough under (1) 1940 A.C. 51, 56 (1939) 22 Tax Cas. 603, 636. (2) 1921 2 A.C. 171, 201. s.16(2) of the Act their dividend is increased by a proportionate amount of tax paid by the company, the payment of the tax by the company is deemed tinder ss. 18(5) and 49B(1) to be payment by the shareholders. The rates of income-tax applicable to the company are, in most instances, higher than the rates applicable to the individual shareholders, and by this process of grossing up, as it is commonly called, the recipient of the dividend gets some benefit. The position of a shareholder who gets dividend when his name stands in the register of members of the company causes no difficulty whatever. But transfers of shares are common, and they take place either by a fully executed document such as was contemplated by Regulation 18 of Table A of the Indian Companies Act 1913, or by what are known as blank transfers\nIn such blank transfers, the name of the transferor is entered, and the transfer deed signed by the transferor is handed over with the share scrip to the trans- feree, who, if he so chooses, completes the transfer by entering his name and then applying to the company to register his name in place of the previous holder of the share\nThe company recognises no person except one whose name is on the register of members, upon whom alone calls for unpaid capital can be made and to whom only the dividend declared by the company is legally payable.\n Of course, between the transferor and the transferee, certain equities arise even on the execution and handing over of a blank transfer, and among these equities is the right of the transferee to claim the dividend declared and paid to the transferor who is treated as a trustee on behalf of the transferee. These equities, however, do not touch the company, and no claim by the transferee whose name is not in the register of members can be made against the company, if the tranferor retains the money in his own hands and fails to pay it to him.\nA glance at the scheme of the Indian Companies Act, 1913, shows that the words member , shareholder and holder of a share have been used interchangeably in that Act\nthe right of a transferee is only to call upon the company to register his name and no more.- No rights arise till such registration ,takes place\nSection 2(16) of the Indian Companies Act, 1913, defines share as share in the share capital of the company Section 5 deals with the mode of forming incorporated companies, and in the case of companies limited by shares, the liability of the members is limited to the amounts, if any, unpaid on the shares respectively held by them. By s. 18, Table A is made applicable to companies, unless by the Articles of any company the terms of Table A have been excluded or modified. Regulation 18 of Table A reads as follows The instrument of transfer of any share in the company shall be executed both by the transferor and transferee, and the transferor shall be deemed to remain holder of the share until the name of the transferee is entered in the register of members in respect thereof. The words holder of a share are really equal to the word shareholder and the expression holder of a share denotes, in so far as the company is concerned, only a person who, as a shareholder, has his name entered on the register of members\nunder s. 15 of that Act, the transferee bad not the benefit of a legal title till certain things were done, which were indicated by Lopes, J., in the following passage Therefore the transferor, until the delivery of the deed of transfer to the secretary, is subject to all the liabilities and entitled to all the rights which belong to a shareholder or stockholder, and, in my opinion until the requisite formalities are complied with, he continues the legal -proprietor of the stock or shares subject to that proprietorship being divested, which it may be at any moment, by a compliance with the requisite formalities.\nThe same position obtains in India, though the completion of the transaction by having the name entered in the register of members relates it back to the time when the transfer was first made\nDuring the period that the transfer exists between the transferor and the transferee without emerging as a binding document upon the company, equities exist between them, but not between the transferee and the company. The transferee can call upon the transferor to attend the meeting, vote according to his directions, sign documents in relation to the issuance of fresh capital, call for emergent meetings and inter alia, also compel the transferor to pay such dividend as he may have received\nBut these rights though they, no doubt, clothe the transferee with an equitable ownership-, are not sufficient to make the transferee a full owner, since the legal interest vis-a-vis the company still outstands in the transferor so much so, that the company credits the dividends only to the transferor and also calls upon him to make payment of any unpaid capital, which may be needed\nThe position, therefore, under the Indian Com- panies Act, 1913, is quite clear that the expression shareholder or holder of a share in so far as that Act is concerned, denotes no other person except a member\nThe question that arises in the present case is whether by reason of ss. 16(2) and 18(5) the assessee, who was a transferee on a blank transfer is entitled to the benefits of the grossing up of the dividend income\nThe question that falls for consideration is whether the meaning given to the expression shareholder used in s. 18(5) of the Act by these cases is correct. No valid reason exists why shareholder as used in s. 18(5) should mean a person other than the one denoted by the same expression in the Indian Companies Act, 1913\nIn In re Wala Wynaad Indian Gold Mining Company (5), Chitty, J., observed I use now myself the term which is common in the Courts, I a shareholder, that means the holder of the shares. It is the common term used, and only means the person who holds the shares by having his name on the register.\nLearned counsel for the assessee cited a number of authorities in which the ownership of the dividend was in question, and it was held that the transferee whose name was not registered, was entitled to the dividend after transfer had been made\nNo one can doubt the correctness of the proposition in these cases, but from an equitable right to compel the transferor to give up the dividend to the transferee, to a claim to the dividend by him as a shareholder against the company is a wide jump. In so far as the company is concerned, it does not even issue the certificate under s. 20 of the Income-tax Act in the name of an unregistered transferee but only in the name of the transferor whom it recognises, because his name is borne on its books\nSection 20 lays down The principal officer of every company shall, at the time of distribution of dividends, furnish to every person receiving a dividend a certificate to the effect that the company has paid or will pay income-tax on the profits which are being distributed, and specifying such other particulars as may be prescribed\nThe meaning of s. 20 as also of s. 18(5) is clear if they are read with s. 19A, under which information regarding dividends has to be supplied by the company when demanded by the Income-tax Officer.\n It lays down The principal officer of every company shall, on or before the 15th day of June in each year, furnish to the prescribed officer a return in the prescribed form and verified in the prescribed manner of the names and of the addresses, as entered in the register of shareholders maintained by the company, of the shareholders to whom a dividend or aggregate dividends exceeding Such amount as may be prescribed in this behalf has or have been, distributed during the, preceding year and of the amount so distributed to each such shareholder\nSection 19A makes it clear, if any doubt existed, that by the term shareholder is meant the person whose name and address are entered in the register of shareholders maintained by the company. There is but one register maintained by the Company\nThere (1) (1945) 26 Tax Cas. 359. is no separate register of shareholders such as the assessee claims to be but only a register of members . This takes us immediately to the register of members, and demonstrates that even for the purpose of the Indian Income- tax Act, the words ,member and shareholder can be read as synonymous. The words of s. 18(5) must accordingly be read in the light in which the word shareholder has been used in the subsequent sections, and read in that manner, the present assessee, notwithstanding the equitable right to the dividend, was not entitled to be regarded as a shareholder for the purpose of s. 18(5) of the Act", + "expert_4": "The applicant had received sums of Rs. 3,831, Rs. 6,606, Rs. 7,954 and Rs. 8,304 in the four assessment years, 1944- 45, 1945-46, 1946-47 and 1947-48 as income from dividends.\nThe shares in respect of which this dividend income was received were the property of the Applicant but in the books of the various companies these stood in the names of other persons.\nappears that these shares were purchased by the Applicant from other persons under a blank transfer but the transfers had not been registered with the various companies.\nThe Applicants claim in these income-tax proceedings was that these shares although not registered in the name of the applicant were the property of the applicant. It was further claimed that this dividend income should be grossed up under s. 16(2) and credit for the tax deducted should be allowed to the Applicant under s. 18(5).\nThe Income-tax Officer did not accept this claim, and the appeals of the assessee were rejected by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Calcutta, A Range and by the Appellate Tribunal.\nThe Tribunal, however, on being moved, referred the following question to the High Court Whether in the facts and circumstances of this case, the Applicant (the assessee) was entitled to have this dividend income grossed up under section 16(2) and claim credit for tax deducted at source under section 18(5) of the Income-tax Act?\nThe High Court answered the question in the negative, thus affirming the decisions of the Department and the Appellate Tribunal.\nThe assessee contends that the decision of the High Court is erroneous, and that it is entitled to have the dividend income I grossed up under s. 16(2) and also to claim credit for tax deducted at source, under s.18(5) of the Income-tax Act.\nThe relevant sections are as follows 16(2) For the purposes of inclusion in the total income of an assessee any dividend shall be deemed to be income of the previous year in which it is paid, credited or distributed or deemed to have been paid, credited or distributed to him, and shall be increased to such amount as would, if income-tax (but not super-tax) at the rate applicable to the total income of the company without taking into account any rebate allowed or additional income-tax charged for the financial year in which the dividend is paid, credited or distributed or deemed to have been paid, credited or distributed, were deducted therefrom, be equal to the amount of the dividend (proviso omitted). 18 (5) Any deduction made and paid to the account of the Central Government in accordance with the provisions of this section and any sum by which a dividend has been increased under sub-section (2) of section 16 shall be treated as a payment of incometax or super-tax on behalf of the shareholder and credit shall be given to him therefor on the production of the certificate furnished undersection 20 in the assessment, if any, made for the following year under this Act (proviso omitted). 49B(1) Where any dividend has been paid, credited or distributed or is deemed to have been paid, credited or distributed to any of the persons specified in section 3 who is a shareholder of a company which is assessed to income- tax in the taxable territories or elsewhere, such person shall, if the dividend is included in his total income, be deemed in respect of such dividend himself to have paid income-tax (exclusive of super-tax) of an amount equal to the sum by which the dividend has been increased under sub- section (2) of section 16.\nIn the opinion of the High Court, an assessee whose name was not in the register of members of the companies was not entitled to the benefit of these provisions.\nThe learned Judges of the High Court were of the opinion that the word shareholder in s.18(5) had the same signification as the word member used in the Indian Companies Act and that the assessee was not qualified to be considered as a shareholder, even though by a blank transfer it had ,purchased the relevant shares.\nIn our opinion, the High Court was right in its conclusion.\nA company when it pays income-tax, does not do so on behalf of the shareholders. It is itself chargeable under the Act, In Cull v. Inland Revenue Commissioners (1), Lord Atkin stated the law (which in substance is also the law in our country) thus My Lords, it is now clearly established that in the case of a limited company the company itself is chargeable to tax on its profits, and that it pays tax in discharge of its own liability and not as agent for its shareholders At one time it was thought that the company, in paying tax, paid on behalf of the shareholder but this theory is now exploded by decisions in this House, and the position of the shareholders as to tax is as I have stated it.\nWhen the company pays its own income-tax and declares a dividend from the balance of its profits, it deducts from such dividend a proportionate part of the amount of the tax paid by it.\nThis principle is explained in another English case, and it is substantially also the law in this country. In Inland Revenue Commissioners v. Blott (2), Viscount Cave stated the law in these words Plainly, a company paying income-tax on its profits does not pay it as agent for its shareholders.\nIt pays as a tax- payer, and if no dividend is declared, the shareholders have no direct concern in the payment.\nIf a dividend is declared, -the company is entitled to deduct from such dividend a proportionate part of the amount of the tax previously paid by the company and, in that case, the payment by the company operates in relief of the shareholder.\nThe share-holders, however, get the benefit of the payment of the tax by the company.\ns.16(2) of the Act their dividend is increased by a proportionate amount of tax paid by the company, the payment of the tax by the company is deemed tinder ss. 18(5) and 49B(1) to be payment by the shareholders. The rates of income-tax applicable to the company are, in most instances, higher than the rates applicable to the individual shareholders, and by this process of grossing up, as it is commonly called, the recipient of the dividend gets some benefit.\nThe position of a shareholder who gets dividend when his name stands in the register of members of the company causes no difficulty whatever.\nIn such blank transfers, the name of the transferor is entered, and the transfer deed signed by the transferor is handed over with the share scrip to the trans- feree, who, if he so chooses, completes the transfer by entering his name and then applying to the company to register his name in place of the previous holder of the share.\nThe company recognises no person except one whose name is on the register of members, upon whom alone calls for unpaid capital can be made and to whom only the dividend declared by the company is legally payable.\nThese equities, however, do not touch the company, and no claim by the transferee whose name is not in the register of members can be made against the company, if the tranferor retains the money in his own hands and fails to pay it to him. A glance at the scheme of the Indian Companies Act, 1913, shows that the words member , shareholder and holder of a share have been used interchangeably in that Act.\nIndeed, the opinion of most of the writers on the subject is also the same.\nRegulation 18 of Table A reads as follows The instrument of transfer of any share in the company shall be executed both by the transferor and transferee, and the transferor shall be deemed to remain holder of the share until the name of the transferee is entered in the register of members in respect thereof.\nThe words holder of a share are really equal to the word shareholder and the expression holder of a share denotes, in so far as the company is concerned, only a person who, as a shareholder, has his name entered on the register of members.\nA similar view of the Companies Clauses Consolidation Act, 1845, was taken in Nanney v. Morgan(1).\nThe learned Lord Justices held that under s. 15 of that Act, the transferee bad not the benefit of a legal title till certain things were done, which were indicated by Lopes, J., in the following passage Therefore the transferor, until the delivery of the deed of transfer to the secretary, is subject to all the liabilities and entitled to all the rights which belong to a shareholder or stockholder, and, in my opinion until the requisite formalities are complied with, he continues the legal -proprietor of the stock or shares subject to that proprietorship being divested, which it may be at any moment, by a compliance with the requisite formalities.\nThe same position obtains in India, though the completion of the transaction by having the name entered in the register of members relates it back to the time when the transfer was first made.\nDuring the period that the transfer exists between the transferor and the transferee without emerging as a binding document upon the company, equities exist between them, but not between the transferee and the company.\nThe transferee can call upon the transferor to attend the meeting, vote according to his directions, sign documents in relation to the issuance of fresh capital, call for emergent meetings and inter alia, also compel the transferor to pay such dividend as he may have received.\nSassoon Co. Ltd. v. Patch-(2) approved in Mathalone v. Bombay Life Assurance Co. Ltd. (3 ).\nBut these rights though they, no doubt, clothe the transferee with an equitable ownership-, are not sufficient to make the transferee a full owner, since the legal interest vis-a-vis the company still outstands in the transferor so much so, that the company credits the dividends only to the transferor and also calls upon him to make payment of any unpaid capital, which may be needed.\nThe position, therefore, under the Indian Com- panies Act, 1913, is quite clear that the expression shareholder or holder of a share in so far as that Act is concerned, denotes no other person except a member .\nThe question that arises in the present case is whether by reason of ss. 16(2) and 18(5) the assessee, who was a transferee on a blank transfer is entitled to the benefits of the grossing up of the dividend income.\nLearned counsel for the assessee strenuously contends that the assessee being an owner in equity of the shares and thus also of the dividend is entitled to this benefit.\n He refers to the use of the word I assessee in s. 16(2).\nThe Department, on the\nother hand, says that the dividend can be increased under s. 16(2) and credit allowed under s. 18(5) if the assessee is a shareholder, because the benefit of s. 18(5) can go only to the shareholder, i. e., a person with his name on the register of members, and not to a person holding an equity against such shareholder.\nThe assessee contends that the word shareholder includes even a person who holds a share as a result of a blank transfer, and does not necessarily mean a member of the company, whose name is on the register of members.\nAuthorities on this point are not wanting, and indeed, in the judgment of the Calcutta High Court they have all been referred to. They are all against the assessee.\nShree Shakti Mills Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-tax (1), Jaluram Bhikulal v.\nCommissioner of Income-tax (2), Arvind N. Mafatlal v.\nIncometax Officer (3) and Bikaner Trading Co. v. Commissioner of Income-tax (4).\nThe question that falls for consideration is whether the meaning given to the expression shareholder used in s. 18(5) of the Act by these cases is correct.\nNo valid reason exists why shareholder as used in s. 18(5) should mean a person other than the one denoted by the same expression in the Indian Companies Act, 1913.\nIn In re Wala Wynaad Indian Gold Mining Company (5), Chitty, J., observed I use now myself the term which is common in the Courts, I a shareholder, that means the holder of the shares.\nIt is the common term used, and only means the person who holds the shares by having his name on the register.\nLearned counsel for the assessee cited a number of authorities in which the ownership of the dividend was in question, and it was held that the transferee whose name was not registered, was entitled to the dividend after transfer had been made.\nThese cases are Commissioners of Inland Revenue v. Sir John Oakley (6), Spence v. Commissioners of Inland Revenue\nMultipar Syndicate, Ltd. v.\nDevitt (1).\nNo one can doubt the correctness of the proposition in these cases, but from an equitable right to compel the transferor to give up the dividend to the transferee, to a claim to the dividend by him as a shareholder against the company is a wide jump.\nIn so far as the company is concerned, it does not even issue the certificate under s. 20 of the Income-tax Act in the name of an unregistered transferee but only in the name of the transferor whom it recognises, because his name is borne on its books.\nSection 20 lays down The principal officer of every company shall, at the time of distribution of dividends, furnish to every person receiving a dividend a certificate to the effect that the company has paid or will pay income-tax on the profits which are being distributed, and specifying such other particulars as may be prescribed.\nThe meaning of s. 20 as also of s. 18(5) is clear if they are read with s. 19A, under which information regarding dividends has to be supplied by the company when demanded by the Income-tax Officer.\nIt lays down The principal officer of every company shall, on or before the 15th day of June in each year, furnish to the prescribed officer a return in the prescribed form and verified in the prescribed manner of the names and of the addresses, as entered in the register of shareholders maintained by the company, of the shareholders to whom a dividend or aggregate dividends exceeding Such amount as may be prescribed in this behalf has or have been, distributed during the, preceding year and of the amount so distributed to each such shareholder.\nSection 19A makes it clear, if any doubt existed, that by the term shareholder is meant the person whose name and address are entered in the register of shareholders maintained by the company. There is but one register maintained by the Company.\nThere (1) (1945) 26 Tax Cas. 359. is no separate register of shareholders such as the assessee claims to be but only a register of members . This takes us immediately to the register of members, and demonstrates that even for the purpose of the Indian Income- tax Act, the words ,member and shareholder can be read as synonymous.\nThe words of s. 18(5) must accordingly be read in the light in which the word shareholder has been used in the subsequent sections, and read in that manner, the present assessee, notwithstanding the equitable right to the dividend, was not entitled to be regarded as a shareholder for the purpose of s. 18(5) of the Act.", + "expert_5": "The shares in respect of which this dividend income was received were the property of the Applicant but in the books of the various companies these stood in the names of other persons.\nIt appears that these shares were purchased by the Applicant from other persons under a blank transfer but the transfers had not been registered with the various companies.\nThe learned Judges of the High Court were of the opinion that the word shareholder in s.18(5) had the same signification as the word member used in the Indian Companies Act and that the assessee was not qualified to be considered as a shareholder, even though by a blank transfer it had ,purchased the relevant shares. In our opinion, the High Court was right in its conclusion.\nA company when it pays income-tax, does not do so on behalf of the shareholders.\nWhen the company pays its own income-tax and declares a dividend from the balance of its profits, it deducts from such dividend a proportionate part of the amount of the tax paid by it.\nand it is substantially also the law in this country.\nThe rates of income-tax applicable to the company are, in most instances, higher than the rates applicable to the individual shareholders, and by this process of grossing up, as it is commonly called, the recipient of the dividend gets some benefit. The position of a shareholder who gets dividend when his name stands in the register of members of the company causes no difficulty whatever.\nThe company recognises no person except one whose name is on the register of members, upon whom alone calls for unpaid capital can be made and to whom only the dividend declared by the company is legally payable.\nThese equities, however, do not touch the company, and no claim by the transferee whose name is not in the register of members can be made against the company, if the tranferor retains the money in his own hands and fails to pay it to him.\nA glance at the scheme of the Indian Companies Act, 1913, shows that the words member , shareholder and holder of a share have been used interchangeably in that Act.\nIndeed, the opinion of most of the writers on the subject is also the same. Buckley on the Companies Act, 12th Edition, page 803 has pointed out that the right of a transferee is only to call upon the company to register his name and no more.- No rights arise till such registration ,takes place.\nthe transferor shall be deemed to remain holder of the share until the name of the transferee is entered in the register of members in respect thereof.\nThe words holder of a share are really equal to the word shareholder and the expression holder of a share denotes, in so far as the company is concerned, only a person who, as a shareholder, has his name entered on the register of members.\nA similar view of the Companies Clauses Consolidation Act, 1845, was taken in Nanney v. Morgan(1). The learned Lord Justices held that under s. 15 of that Act, the transferee bad not the benefit of a legal title till certain things were done, which were indicated by Lopes, J., in the following passage Therefore the transferor, until the delivery of the deed of transfer to the secretary, is subject to all the liabilities and entitled to all the rights which belong to a shareholder or stockholder, and, in my opinion until the requisite formalities are complied with, he continues the legal -proprietor of the stock or shares subject to that proprietorship being divested, which it may be at any moment, by a compliance with the requisite formalities.\nThe same position obtains in India, though the completion of the transaction by having the name entered in the register of members relates it back to the time when the transfer was first made. See Nagabushanam v. Ramachandra Rao (1).\nBut these rights though they, no doubt, clothe the transferee with an equitable ownership-, are not sufficient to make the transferee a full owner, since the legal interest vis-a-vis the company still outstands in the transferor so much so, that the company credits the dividends only to the transferor and also calls upon him to make payment of any unpaid capital, which may be needed.\nThe position, therefore, under the Indian Com- panies Act, 1913, is quite clear that the expression shareholder or holder of a share in so far as that Act is concerned, denotes no other person except a member .\nNo valid reason exists why shareholder as used in s. 18(5) should mean a person other than the one denoted by the same expression in the Indian Companies Act, 1913.\nIn In re Wala Wynaad Indian Gold Mining Company (5), Chitty, J., observed I use now myself the term which is common in the Courts, I a shareholder, that means the holder of the shares. It is the common term used, and only means the person who holds the shares by having his name on the register.\nSection 19A makes it clear, if any doubt existed, that by the term shareholder is meant the person whose name and address are entered in the register of shareholders maintained by the company.\neven for the purpose of the Indian Income- tax Act, the words ,member and shareholder can be read as synonymous.\nThe words of s. 18(5) must accordingly be read in the light in which the word shareholder has been used in the subsequent sections, and read in that manner, the present assessee, notwithstanding the equitable right to the dividend, was not entitled to be regarded as a shareholder for the purpose of s. 18(5) of the Act." + }, + "1959_66": { + "expert_1": "They alleged that the profits of the appellant during the year 195455 were higher than those during the year 1953-54 for which year the appellant had paid four months basic wages as bonus. They also alleged that the wages paid to them by the appellant fell short of the, living wage and therefore the appellant should pay the in six months basic wages as bonus for the relative year. The appellant filed its written statement in answer on August 14, 1956. The appellant submitted that, after providing for the prior charges according to the formula laid down by the Labour Appellate Tribunal the profits made during the year under consideration did riot leave any surplus and tile, respondents were not entitled to any bonus. It denied that it bad made huge profits during the year in question and submitted that the profits made were not even sufficient to provide for the prior charges , etc. The Tribunal after hearing the parties came to the conclusion that even if payment of a bonus equal to 4 1/2 months basic wages were made a fair surplus would be left in the hands of the appellant to the tune of Rs. 3.30 lacs and therefore awarded the same subject to the following conditions- \nAny employee who has been dismissed for misconduct resulting in financial loss to the company shall not be entitled to bonus to the extent of the loss caused. Persons who are eligible for bonus but who are no longer in the service of the company on the date of the payment shall be paid the same provided that they make a written application for the same within three months of publication of this award. Such bonus shall be paid within one month of receipt of application provided that no claim can be enforced before six weeks from the date this award becomes enforceable. Being aggrieved by the said award of the Tribunal, the appellant applied for and obtained from this Court special leave to appeal against the same under Art. 136 of the Constitution and hence this appeal.\nWe feel that a formula which has been thus adopted all throughout the country and has so far worked fairly satisfactorily should be adhered, to, though there is scope for certain flexibility in the working thereof in accordance with the exigencies of the situation.\nThe shareholders may look to larger dividends commensurate with the prosperity of the industrial concern, the company would, apart from rehabilitation and replacement of buildings, plant and machinery, look forward to expansion and satisfaction of other needs of the industry and the workmen would certainly be entitled to ask for a share in the surplus profits with a view to bridge the gap between the wages earned by them and the living wages. All these interests (1) 19551 1,s.C.R. 991, 998. (2) 1958 S.C.R 878, 884, have, therefore, got to be duly and properly provided for having regard to the principles of social justice and once surplus profits available for distribution amongst these respective interests are determined after making due provision for the prior charges as aforesaid the Industrial Tribunal adjudicating upon the dispute would have a free hand in the distribution of the same having regard, of course, to the considerations mentioned hereinabove. But so far as the determination of the surplus profits is concerned the formula must be adhered to in its essential particulars as otherwise there would be no stability nor uniformity of practice in regard to the same.\n It maybe noted, however, that in regard to the depreciation which is a prior charge on the gross profits earned by a concern there is always a difference in the method of approach which is adopted by the income-tax authorities and by the industrial tribunals.\nIt is well settled that the actual income-tax payable by the company on the basis of the full statutory depreciation allowed by the income-tax authorities for the relevant accounting year should be taken into account as a prior charge irrespective of any set off allowed by the Income-tax authorities for prior charges or any other considerations such as building up of income-tax reserves for payment of enhanced liabilities of income-tax accruing in future. It is also well settled that the calculations of the surplus available for distribution should be made having regard to the working of the industrial concern in the relevant (1) (1956) L.A.C. 443. (2) 1959 S.C.R. 925. (3) (1955) L.A.C. 659. accounting year without taking into consideration the credits or debits which are referable to the working of the previous years, e.g., the refund of excess profits tax paid in the past or loss of previous years carried forward but written off in the accounting year as also any provision that may have to be made to meet future liabilities, e.g., redemption of debenture stock, or provision for Provident Fund and Gratuity and other benefits, etc., which, however, necessary they may be, cannot be included in the category of prior charges.\nThat should not have been done and the only depreciation allowed should have been the notional normal depreciation which was agreed between the parties before us at Rs. 6.23 lacs\nWe cannot accept this contention. Even though the bonus formula is a notional one we cannot ignore the fact that in no event would the appellant be bound to pay to the preference shareholders anything beyond 5 by way of return. The Full Bench Formula cannot be so literally construed. There is bound to be some flexibility therein, the 6 which is prescribed there as the return on paid up capital is not inexorable, and the Tribunals could if the circumstances warrant vary the rate of interest either by increasing or decreasing the same. On the facts of this case however there is no warrant for allowing anything beyond 5 return on preference share capital and the amount of Rs. 4.30 lacs should therefore be deducted as another prior charge from the grsos profits of the appellant. 4 return on reserves used as working capital was calculated merely at a figure of Rs. 0.29 lacs worked out on a total figure of Rs. 7,42,139. The Tribunal (1) 1938 S.C.R. 876. did not take into consideration another sum of Rs. 41,81,196 which represented the depreciation fund which according to the appellant had been used as working capital during the year.\nThis being the true position it follows on the facts of the present case that this amount was available for use as working capital and the balance-sheet showed that it was in fact so used. Moreover, DO objection was urged in this behalf nor was any finding to the contrary recorded by the Tribunal.\nWe are, therefore, of the opinion that the reasoning adopted by the Tribunal was not correct and the appellant was entitled to 4 return on the reserves used as working capital including the sum of Rs. 41,81,196.\nNo evidence was at all led by the appellant before the Tribunal showing the cost of the machinery as purchased, the age of the machinery, the estimate for replacement etc., in order to substantiate this claim for rehabilitation and the appellant was content merely to rely upon this recommendation of the Committee on Profit-sharing. This was rightly considered by the Tribunal as insufficient to support the appellants claim, though it allowed for rehabilitation, in addition to the statutory depreciation, the amount for which the appellant had actually made provision, viz., the sum by which the depreciation written off for the year exceeded the statutory depreciation (i. e., Rs. 10,00,000 minus Rs. 9,82,799Rs. 17,201).\n The amount was really small and did not affect the bonus to be awarded. The Tribunal, in fact, allowed the same, though it appears that in the absence of evidence of the nature above referred to even that sum of Rs. 0.17 lacs ought not to have been allowed.\nIn this state of affairs it is really impossible for us to allow the appellants claim for rehabilitation in anything beyond the sum of Rs. 0.17 lacs actually allowed by the Tribunal and the claim of the appellant for any further provision for rehabilitation must be disallowed for the purpose of the bonus calculations for the year under consideration.\nIt will however be open to the appellant to claim higher rehabilitation for subsequent years if it can substantiate its claim by adducing proper evidence. In addition to these various sums allowed to the appellant by way of prior charges against the gross profits earned during the accounting year the Tribunal also allowed to the appellant Rs. 2.50 lacs by way of provision for debenture redemption fund.\nWe are of the opinion that the Tribunal was not justified in allowing the sum of Rs. 2,50,000/- for debenture redemption fund as a prior charge in the bonus calculations. The Full Bench Formula does not envisage any such prior charge. It is no doubt true that capital is shy and it would not be practicable for the industrial concern to raise large amounts by way of fresh debentures when they become due. It is also true that the debentures do not stand on a par with other debts of a concern because the debentureholders would in a conceivable situation be able to enforce their security by bringing the industry to a stand-still by taking over charge of the whole concern. It would therefore appear that the redemption of these debentures would be one of the primary obligations of the industrial concern and due provision has of necessity to be made for redemption thereof on due date. This however does not mean that in the calculations of the distributable surplus the provision for such redemption should be given the status of a prior charge, though of course that would be a relevant con- sideration while distributing the available surplus between the various interests entitled thereto.\nWe are therefore of opinion that the Tribunal was wrong in allowing Rs. 2,50,000/- as a prior charge in the bonus calculations.\nBefore we arrive at the figure of the actual bonus which it will be appropriate in the circumstances of this case to allow to the workmen, we may advert to one argument which was pressed before us. on their behalf and that was that the bonus calculations should not be made on the basis of the All-India figures which were adopted by the Tribunal but on the basis of the actual amounts which the appellant had paid and would have to pay to the workmen concerned. It was pointed out that the respondents here were only the workmen in the Wadala Factory of the appellant.\n The appellant had, however, paid to the various workmen elsewhere as and by way of bonus sums varying between 4 and 29 of the basic wages for the year in question. The sum of Rs. 1,23,138/- only had been paid in full and final settlement to the workmen in some of the factories and the bonus calculations on an All-India basis would thus work to the advantage of the appellant in so far as they would result in saving to the appellant of the difference between the amounts to which those workmen would be entitled on the basis of the All-India figures adopted by the Tribunal and the amounts actually paid to them as a result of agreements, conciliation or adjudication.\nIt was therefore contended that the calculations should be made after taking into account the savings thus effected by the appellant and only a sum of Rs. 1,23,138 - which was the actual sum paid to those workmen should be taken into account and no more. We are afraid, we cannot accept this contention.\nIf this contention was accepted the respondents before us would have an advantage over those workmen with whom settlements have been made and would get larger amounts by way of bonus merely by reason of the fact that the appellant had managed to settle the claims of those workmen at lesser figures.\n If this contention of the respondents was pushed to its logical extent it would also mean that in the event of the non-fulfilment of the conditions imposed by the Tribunal in the award of bonus herein bringing in savings in the hands of the appellant, the respondents would be entitled to take advantage of those savings also and should be awarded larger amounts by way of bonus, which would really be the result of the claimants entitled to the same not receiving it under certain circumstances-an event which would be purely an extraneous one and unconnected with the contribution of the respondents towards the gross profits earned by the appellant.\nThe Tribunal was, therefore, right in calculating the bonus on an All-India basis.\nBy our order dated April 12, 1957, the appellant was ordered to pay to the respondents within a fortnight from the date thereof bonus for the year 1954-55 equivalent to two months basic wages that amount has already been paid and works out at Rs. 3.39 lacs on an All-India basis.\nThe only question which therefore survives is what further bonus, if any, would the respondents be entitled to from the distributable surplus of Rs. 12 lacs. The sum of Rs. 3.50 lacs required for building up the debenture redemption reserve is an all-engrossing need of the appellant and that is a factor which must of necessity be taken into consideration while arriving at the ultimate figure, particularly because such redemption of the debentures would enure not only for the benefit of the Company and its shareholders but also of the workmen employed therein.\nHaving regard to all the circumstances of the case, we feel that an award of four months basic wages as aggregate bonus for the year 1954-55 (which by the way was the bonus awarded for the previous year 1953-54 also) would give a fair share to the labour in the distributable surplus, leaving to the shareholders and the company a balance of Rs. 5.22 lacs to be utilised by them not only towards building up of the debenture redemption reserve but also for building up other reserves, which would be utilised for various other purposes indicated above.", + "expert_2": "They alleged that the profits of the appellant during the year 195455 were higher than those during the year 1953-54 for which year the appellant had paid four months basic wages as bonus. They also alleged that the wages paid to them by the appellant fell short of the, living wage and therefore the appellant should pay the in six months basic wages as bonus for the relative year. The appellant filed its written statement in answer on August 14, 1956. The appellant submitted that, after providing for the prior charges according to the formula laid down by the Labour Appellate Tribunal the profits made during the year under consideration did riot leave any surplus and tile, respondents were not entitled to any bonus. It denied that it bad made huge profits during the year in question and submitted that the profits made were not even sufficient to provide for the prior charges\nThe formula evolved by the Full Bench of the Labour Appellate Tribunal in Millowners Association, Bombay v. Rashtreeya Mill Mazdoor Sangh, Bombay(1) is based on this idea that as both labour and capital contribute to the earnings of the industrial concerti, it is fair that labour should derive some benefit, if there is a surplus after meeting prior or necessary charges . The following were prescribed as the first charges on (1) (1950) L.L.J. 1247 gross profits, viz., (1) Provision for depreciation (2) reserves for rehabilitation (3) a return at 6on the paid up capital (4) a return on the working capital at a lesser rate than the return on paid up capital and (5) an estimated amount in respect of the payment of income-tax. The surplus that remained after making the aforesaid deductions would be available for distribution among the three sharers, viz., the shareholders, the industry and the workmen\nIn any given industry there are three interests involved, viz., the shareholders, the Company and the workmen and all these interests have got to get their proper share in the surplus profits ascertained after due provision is made for these prior charges . The shareholders may look to larger dividends commensurate with the prosperity of the industrial concern, the company would, apart from rehabilitation and replacement of buildings, plant and machinery, look forward to expansion and satisfaction of other needs of the industry and the workmen would certainly be entitled to ask for a share in the surplus profits with a view to bridge the gap between the wages earned by them and the living wages. All these interests (1) 19551 1,s.C.R. 991, 998. (2) 1958 S.C.R 878, 884, have, therefore, got to be duly and properly provided for having regard to the principles of social justice and once surplus profits available for distribution amongst these respective interests are determined after making due provision for the prior charges as aforesaid the Industrial Tribunal adjudicating upon the dispute would have a free hand in the distribution of the same having regard, of course, to the considerations mentioned hereinabove.\nThe initial depreciation and the additional depreciation were abnormal additions to the income-tax depreciation and it would not be fair to the workmen if these depreciations were rated as prior charges before the available surplus was ascertained. Considerations on which the grant of initial and additional depreciations might be justified under the Income-tax Act were different from considerations of social justice and fair apportionment on which the Full Bench Formula in regard to the payment of bonus to workmen was based. This was the reason why we held in that case that only normal depreciation including multiple shift depreciation, but not initial or additional depreciation should rank as prior charge\nCompanys Staff Union v. The Surat Electricity Co., Ltd. (1) where a Bench of the Labour Appellate Tribunal had negatived the contention that if only the normal depreciation allowed by the Income-tax law were allowed a company would be able to recoup the original cost of the assets and observed that For the purpose of bonus formula the initial and additional depreciation, which are disallowed by that formula, must be ignored in fixing the written down value and in determining the period over which the normal depreciation will be allowed. The result will be a notional amount of normal depreciation but, as we have said repeatedly the bonus formula is a notional formula.\nIt is also well settled that the calculations of the surplus available for distribution should be made having regard to the working of the industrial concern in the relevant (1) (1956) L.A.C. 443. (2) 1959 S.C.R. 925. (3) (1955) L.A.C. 659. accounting year without taking into consideration the credits or debits which are referable to the working of the previous years, e.g., the refund of excess profits tax paid in the past or loss of previous years carried forward but written off in the accounting year as also any provision that may have to be made to meet future liabilities, e.g., redemption of debenture stock, or provision for Provident Fund and Gratuity and other benefits, etc., which, however, necessary they may be, cannot be included in the category of prior charges.\nIf regard be had to the principles enunciated above it is clear that the items of Rs. 1.14 lacs representing the Lahore factory balance written off, Rs. 0.34 lacs being patents written off, and Rs. 0.09 lacs shown as loss on sale of Tardeo property cannot be allowed as proper deductions from the gross profits for the purposes of bonus calculations. The first two items represented debits in connection with the working of previous years. Loss of the Lahore factory had been incurred during the three previous accounting years and had been carried forward from year to year and the only thing which was done during the year under consideration was that it was then written off as irre- coverable. The patents also had been worked off in previous years and the amounts spent in the purchase thereof were therefore to be written off but had reference to the working of the company during the previous years.\nThat should not have been done and the only depreciation allowed should have been the notional normal depreciation which was agreed between the parties before us at Rs. 6.23 lacs.\nEven though the bonus formula is a notional one we cannot ignore the fact that in no event would the appellant be bound to pay to the preference shareholders anything beyond 5 by way of return. The Full Bench Formula cannot be so literally construed. There is bound to be some flexibility therein, the 6 which is prescribed there as the return on paid up capital is not inexorable, and the Tribunals could if the circumstances warrant vary the rate of interest either by increasing or decreasing the same.\nThe Tribunal (1) 1938 S.C.R. 876. did not take into consideration another sum of Rs. 41,81,196 which represented the depreciation fund which according to the appellant had been used as working capital during the year. If that had been allowed a further sum of Rs. 1.67 lacs should have been added to Rs. 0.29 lacs and the total amount of 4 return on reserves used as working capital would have amounted to Rs. 1.96 lacs.\nThis being the true position it follows on the facts of the present case that this amount was available for use as working capital and the balance-sheet showed that it was in fact so used. Moreover, DO objection was urged in this behalf nor was any finding to the contrary recorded by the Tribunal. We are, therefore, of the opinion that the reasoning adopted by the Tribunal was not correct and the appellant was entitled to 4 return on the reserves used as working capital including the sum of Rs. 41,81,196. The appellant was thus entitled to Rs. 1.96 lacs as the 4 return on reserves used as working capital and not merely Rs. 0.29 lacs as allowed by the Tribunal.\nThe Tribunal, in fact, allowed the same, though it appears that in the absence of evidence of the nature above referred to even that sum of Rs. 0.17 lacs ought not to have been allowed. In this state of affairs it is really impossible for us to allow the appellants claim for rehabilitation in anything beyond the sum of Rs. 0.17 lacs actually allowed by the Tribunal and the claim of the appellant for any further provision for rehabilitation must be disallowed for the purpose of the bonus calculations for the year under consideration.\nThe Tribunal pointed out that when the appellant had in its accounts appropriated Rs. 2,50,000 for the debenture redemption fund the claim to have Rs. 3,50,000 for the purposes of bonus formula was clearly untenable. It however was of the opinion that a reasonable provision for redemption fund should be allowed as a prior charge and actually allowed the sum of Rs. 2,50,000 which had been actually provided for the purpose in the balance-sheet, negativing the contention of the respondents that no provision should be allowed for debenture redemption fund in the bonus formula. We are of the opinion that the Tribunal was not justified in allowing the sum of Rs. 2,50,000/- for debenture redemption fund as a prior charge in the bonus calculations. The Full Bench Formula does not envisage any such prior charge.\nIt would therefore appear that the redemption of these debentures would be one of the primary obligations of the industrial concern and due provision has of necessity to be made for redemption thereof on due date. This however does not mean that in the calculations of the distributable surplus the provision for such redemption should be given the status of a prior charge, though of course that would be a relevant con- sideration while distributing the available surplus between the various interests entitled thereto. We are therefore of opinion that the Tribunal was wrong in allowing Rs. 2,50,000/- as a prior charge in the bonus calculations.\nThis surplus of Rs. 12 lacs would have to be distributed amongst them having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, of course bearing in mind the various considerations indicated above. Before we arrive at the figure of the actual bonus which it will be appropriate in the circumstances of this case to allow to the workmen, we may advert to one argument which was pressed before us. on their behalf and that was that the bonus calculations should not be made on the basis of the All-India figures which were adopted by the Tribunal but on the basis of the actual amounts which the appellant had paid and would have to pay to the workmen concerned.\nHaving regard to all the circumstances of the case, we feel that an award of four months basic wages as aggregate bonus for the year 1954-55 (which by the way was the bonus awarded for the previous year 1953-54 also) would give a fair share to the labour in the distributable surplus, leaving to the shareholders and the company a balance of Rs. 5.22 lacs to be utilised by them not only towards building up of the debenture redemption reserve but also for building up other reserves, which would be utilised for various other purposes indicated above.", + "expert_3": "The award made by the Industrial Tribunal, Bombay, in Reference (IT) No. 75 of 1956 between the appellant and the respondents whereby the Industrial Tribunal awarded to the respondents 4 1/2 months basic wages as bonus for the year 1954-55 (year ending June 30, 1955)\nThe appellant is a subsidiary of the Premier Construction Co., Ltd., and manufactures Hume Pipes. It has factories in different parts of India, Pakistan and Ceylon. The respondents are the workers employed in the appellants factory at Antop Hill, Wadala, Bombay\nIn October 1955, respondent I who are workmen represented by the Engineering Mazdoor Sabha made a demand for the payment of six-months wages as bonus for the year 1954-55. The matter was also referred to the Conciliation Officer requesting him to initiate Conciliation Proceedings. The Conciliation Proceedings went on before the Conciliation Officer upto March 23, 1956, on which date both the parties arrived at and executed an Agreement to refer the matter to an Industrial Tribunal for adjudication.\n Accordingly, on April 30, 1956, both the parties drew up and signed a joint- application for referring the dispute for adjudication to a Tribunal and the Government of Bombay thereupon in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-s. (2) of s. 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, by its order dated June 11, 1956, referred the following dispute to the Tribunal - DEMAND Every Workman (daily rated) should be paid bonus for the year 1954-55 (year ending 30th June, 1955) equivalent to six-months wages without it attaching any condition thereto\nRespondent No. I filed their statement of claim before -the Tribunal on June 29, 1956\nThey alleged that the profits of the appellant during the year 195455 were higher than those during the year 1953-54 for which year the appellant had paid four months basic wages as bonus. They also alleged that the wages paid to them by the appellant fell short of the, living wage and therefore the appellant should pay the in six months basic wages as bonus for the relative year\nThe appellant filed its written statement in answer on August 14, 1956. The appellant submitted that, after providing for the prior charges according to the formula laid down by the Labour Appellate Tribunal the profits made during the year under consideration did riot leave any surplus and tile, respondents were not entitled to any bonus. It denied that it bad made huge profits during the year in question and submitted that the profits made were not even sufficient to provide for the prior charges , etc\nThe Tribunal after hearing the parties came to the conclusion that even if payment of a bonus equal to 4 1/2 months basic wages were made a fair surplus would be left in the hands of the appellant to the tune of Rs. 3.30 lacs and therefore awarded the same subject to the following conditions- \nAny employee who has been dismissed for misconduct resulting in financial loss to the company shall not be entitled to bonus to the extent of the loss caused. Persons who are eligible for bonus but who are no longer in the service of the company on the date of the payment shall be paid the same provided that they make a written application for the same within three months of publication of this award\nBeing aggrieved by the said award of the Tribunal, the appellant applied for and obtained from this Court special leave to appeal against the same under Art. 136 of the Constitution and hence this appeal\nThe formula evolved by the Full Bench of the Labour Appellate Tribunal in Millowners Association, Bombay v. Rashtreeya Mill Mazdoor Sangh, Bombay(1) is based on this idea that as both labour and capital contribute to the earnings of the industrial concerti, it is fair that labour should derive some benefit, if there is a surplus after meeting prior or necessary charges . The following were prescribed as the first charges on (1) (1950) L.L.J. 1247 gross profits, viz., (1) Provision for depreciation (2) reserves for rehabilitation (3) a return at 6on the paid up capital (4) a return on the working capital at a lesser rate than the return on paid up capital and (5) an estimated amount in respect of the payment of income-tax. The surplus that remained after making the aforesaid deductions would be available for distribution among the three sharers, viz., the shareholders, the industry and the workmen\nThis Full Bench -Formula has been working all throughout the country since its enunciation as aforesaid and has been found to be, in the main, fairly satisfactory. It is conducive to the benefit of both labour and capital and even though certain variations have been attempted to be made therein from time to time the main features thereof have not been substantially departed from. We feel that a formula which has been thus adopted all throughout the country and has so far worked fairly satisfactorily should be adhered, to, though there is scope for certain flexibility in the working thereof in accordance with the exigencies of the situation. In the working of the said formula, however, regard must be had both to the interests of capital and labour\nIn any given industry there are three interests involved, viz., the shareholders, the Company and the workmen and all these interests have got to get their proper share in the surplus profits ascertained after due provision is made for these prior charges\nThe shareholders may look to larger dividends commensurate with the prosperity of the industrial concern, the company would, apart from rehabilitation and replacement of buildings, plant and machinery, look forward to expansion and satisfaction of other needs of the industry and the workmen would certainly be entitled to ask for a share in the surplus profits with a view to bridge the gap between the wages earned by them and the living wages. All these interests (1) 19551 1,s.C.R. 991, 998. (2) 1958 S.C.R 878, 884, have, therefore, got to be duly and properly provided for having regard to the principles of social justice and once surplus profits available for distribution amongst these respective interests are determined after making due provision for the prior charges as aforesaid the Industrial Tribunal adjudicating upon the dispute would have a free hand in the distribution of the same having regard, of course, to the considerations mentioned hereinabove\nBut so far as the determination of the surplus profits is concerned the formula must be adhered to in its essential particulars as otherwise there would be no stability nor uniformity of practice in regard to the same.\nIt maybe noted, however, that in regard to the depreciation which is a prior charge on the gross profits earned by a concern there is always a difference in the method of approach which is adopted by the income-tax authorities and by the industrial tribunals\nthe whole of the depreciation admissible under the Income-tax Act was not allowable in determining the available surplus. The initial depreciation and the additional depreciation were abnormal additions to the income-tax depreciation and it would not be fair to the workmen if these depreciations were rated as prior charges before the available surplus was ascertained. Considerations on which the grant of initial and additional depreciations might be justified under the Income-tax Act were different from considerations of social justice and fair apportionment on which the Full Bench Formula in regard to the payment of bonus to workmen was based\nwe held in that case that only normal depreciation including multiple shift depreciation, but not initial or additional depreciation should rank as prior charge\nWhen this decision was reached we had not before us the decision of the Labour Appellate Tribunal in Surat Electricity Companys Staff Union v. The Surat Electricity Co., Ltd. (1) where a Bench of the Labour Appellate Tribunal had negatived the contention that if only the normal depreciation allowed by the Income-tax law were allowed a company would be able to recoup the original cost of the assets and observed that For the purpose of bonus formula the initial and additional depreciation, which are disallowed by that formula, must be ignored in fixing the written down value and in determining the period over which the normal depreciation will be allowed\nThe result will be a notional amount of normal depreciation but, as we have said repeatedly the bonus formula is a notional formula\nfor the purpose of the bonus formula the notional normal depreciation should be deducted from the gross profits calculated on the basis adopted in Surat Electric Supply Co. Staff Union v. Surat Electricity Co., Ltd. (1) and not merely the normal depreciation including multiple shift depreciation allowed by the income-tax authorities\nIt is well settled that the actual income-tax payable by the company on the basis of the full statutory depreciation allowed by the income-tax authorities for the relevant accounting year should be taken into account as a prior charge irrespective of any set off allowed by the Income-tax authorities for prior charges or any other considerations such as building up of income-tax reserves for payment of enhanced liabilities of income-tax accruing in future. It is also well settled that the calculations of the surplus available for distribution should be made having regard to the working of the industrial concern in the relevant (1) (1956) L.A.C. 443. (2) 1959 S.C.R. 925. (3) (1955) L.A.C. 659. accounting year without taking into consideration the credits or debits which are referable to the working of the previous years, e.g., the refund of excess profits tax paid in the past or loss of previous years carried forward but written off in the accounting year as also any provision that may have to be made to meet future liabilities, e.g., redemption of debenture stock, or provision for Provident Fund and Gratuity and other benefits, etc., which, however, necessary they may be, cannot be included in the category of prior charges.\nIf regard be had to the principles enunciated above it is clear that the items of Rs. 1.14 lacs representing the Lahore factory balance written off, Rs. 0.34 lacs being patents written off, and Rs. 0.09 lacs shown as loss on sale of Tardeo property cannot be allowed as proper deductions from the gross profits for the purposes of bonus calculations. The first two items represented debits in connection with the working of previous years. Loss of the Lahore factory had been incurred during the three previous accounting years and had been carried forward from year to year and the only thing which was done during the year under consideration was that it was then written off as irre- coverable\nThe patents also had been worked off in previous years and the amounts spent in the purchase thereof were therefore to be written off but had reference to the working of the company during the previous years. The last item of Rs. 0.09 lacs was trivial and was therefore not pressed with the result that all these three items were rightly added back in the calculations of the gross profits of the appellant and the figure of gross profits taken at Rs. 36.21 lacs was correctly arrived at by the Tribunal.\nThe depreciation allowed by the Tribunal was Rs. 9.82 lacs which was the full statutory depreciation allowed by the Income-tax authorities. That should not have been done and the only depreciation allowed should have been the notional normal depreciation which was agreed between the parties before us at Rs. 6.23 lacs\nWorking the figure of income-tax deducted by the appellant on the basis adopted in Shree Meenakshi Mills Ltd. \n Their Workmen (1) the income-tax on the gross profits of Rs. 36.21 lacs less the statutory depreciation allowed by the income-tax authorities, viz., Rs. 9.82 lacs would be equivalent to 7 annas in the rupee on Rs. 26.39 lacs, i.e., Rs. 11.55 lacs thus leaving a balance of Rs. 16.82 lacs from which the other prior charges would have to be deducted in order to ascertain the distributable surplus. 6 return on the ordinary share capital and 5 return on the preference share capital would come to Rs. 4.30 lacs\nEven though the bonus formula is a notional one we cannot ignore the fact that in no event would the appellant be bound to pay to the preference shareholders anything beyond 5 by way of return. The Full Bench Formula cannot be so literally construed. There is bound to be some flexibility therein, the 6 which is prescribed there as the return on paid up capital is not inexorable, and the Tribunals could if the circumstances warrant vary the rate of interest either by increasing or decreasing the same\nOn the facts of this case however there is no warrant for allowing anything beyond 5 return on preference share capital and the amount of Rs. 4.30 lacs should therefore be deducted as another prior charge from the grsos profits of the appellant. 4 return on reserves used as working capital was calculated merely at a figure of Rs. 0.29 lacs worked out on a total figure of Rs. 7,42,139. The Tribunal (1) 1938 S.C.R. 876. did not take into consideration another sum of Rs. 41,81,196 which represented the depreciation fund which according to the appellant had been used as working capital during the year\nIf that had been allowed a further sum of Rs. 1.67 lacs should have been added to Rs. 0.29 lacs and the total amount of 4 return on reserves used as working capital would have amounted to Rs. 1.96 lacs\nThe answer furnished by the appellant in regard to both these contentions was that on a true reading of the balance- sheet Rs. 41,81,196 were reserves used as working capital, vide calculations in Exhibit C-12. Provision for depreciation was Rs. 1,10,29,954 and the paid up capital was Rs. 80,00,000 thus totaling to Rs. 1,90,29,954. The total capital block as shown in page 5 of the balance-sheet for the year ending June 30, 1955, was Rs. 1,48,48,758 and the working capital therefore was Rs. 41,81,196. This was apart from Rs. 7,42,139 which was the total of the three items at page 4 of the balance-sheet Rs. 98,405 capital reserves, Rs. 4,73,734 other reserves and Rs. 1,70,000 provision for doubtful debts as also the investments, cash and bank balance.\nThis being the true position it follows on the facts of the present case that this amount was available for use as working capital and the balance-sheet showed that it was in fact so used.\nMoreover, DO objection was urged in this behalf nor was any finding to the contrary recorded by the Tribunal. We are, therefore, of the opinion that the reasoning adopted by the Tribunal was not correct and the appellant was entitled to 4 return on the reserves used as working capital including the sum of Rs. 41,81,196. The appellant was thus entitled to Rs. 1.96 lacs as the 4 return on reserves used as working capital and not merely Rs. 0.29 lacs as allowed by the Tribunal\nThe provision for rehabilitation bad been claimed by the appellant at Rs. 1.10 lacs on the basis of 10 of the net profits relying upon para. 20 of the Report of the Committee on Profit Sharing in which the Committee had proposed that 10 of the net profits should compulsorily be set aside for reserves to meet emergencies as well as for rehabilitation, modernization and reasonable expansion. No evidence was at all led by the appellant before the Tribunal showing the cost of the machinery as purchased, the age of the machinery, the estimate for replacement etc., in order to substantiate this claim for rehabilitation and the appellant was content merely to rely upon this recommendation of the Committee on Profit-sharing\nThis was rightly considered by the Tribunal as insufficient to support the appellants claim, though it allowed for rehabilitation, in addition to the statutory depreciation, the amount for which the appellant had actually made provision, viz., the sum by which the depreciation written off for the year exceeded the statutory depreciation (i. e., Rs. 10,00,000 minus Rs. 9,82,799Rs. 17,201).\n The amount was really small and did not affect the bonus to be awarded. The Tribunal, in fact, allowed the same, though it appears that in the absence of evidence of the nature above referred to even that sum of Rs. 0.17 lacs ought not to have been allowed\nIn this state of affairs it is really impossible for us to allow the appellants claim for rehabilitation in anything beyond the sum of Rs. 0.17 lacs actually allowed by the Tribunal and the claim of the appellant for any further provision for rehabilitation must be disallowed for the purpose of the bonus calculations for the year under consideration\nIn addition to these various sums allowed to the appellant by way of prior charges against the gross profits earned during the accounting year the Tribunal also allowed to the appellant Rs. 2.50 lacs by way of provision for debenture redemption fund. The claim of the appellant was for a sum of Rs. 3.50 lacs for the same\nThe appellant had issued debentures of the value of Rs. 30 lacs in the year 1942-43 and they were redeemable in the year 1962-63. No annual provision had been made from profits for redemption of the same inasmuch as until the year 1949 the appellant was not working at a profit.\n Such provision was made only thereafter\nFor the year 1950-51, the appellant made a provision for Rs. 75,000 for debenture redemption fund, for 1951.52, Rs. 1,50,000, for 1952-53 Rs. 1,50,000, for 1953-54 Rs. 75,000 and further provision had to be made for redemption of debentures in a sum of Rs. 24,50,000. In so far as 7 more years were left before the due date for redemption the appellant claimed Rs. 3,50,000 as the annual sum to be set apart, though as a matter of fact in the balance-sheet only a provision of Rs. 2,50,000 had been made by it for debenture redemption reserve.\nThe Tribunal pointed out that when the appellant had in its accounts appropriated Rs. 2,50,000 for the debenture redemption fund the claim to have Rs. 3,50,000 for the purposes of bonus formula was clearly untenable. It however was of the opinion that a reasonable provision for redemption fund should be allowed as a prior charge and actually allowed the sum of Rs. 2,50,000 which had been actually provided for the purpose in the balance-sheet, negativing the contention of the respondents that no provision should be allowed for debenture redemption fund in the bonus formula. We are of the opinion that the Tribunal was not justified in allowing the sum of Rs. 2,50,000/- for debenture redemption fund as a prior charge in the bonus calculations.\nThe Full Bench Formula does not envisage any such prior charge. It is no doubt true that capital is shy and it would not be practicable for the industrial concern to raise large amounts by way of fresh debentures when they become due\nIt is also true that the debentures do not stand on a par with other debts of a concern because the debentureholders would in a conceivable situation be able to enforce their security by bringing the industry to a stand-still by taking over charge of the whole concern. It would therefore appear that the redemption of these debentures would be one of the primary obligations of the industrial concern and due provision has of necessity to be made for redemption thereof on due date\nThis however does not mean that in the calculations of the distributable surplus the provision for such redemption should be given the status of a prior charge, though of course that would be a relevant con- sideration while distributing the available surplus between the various interests entitled thereto. We are therefore of opinion that the Tribunal was wrong in allowing Rs. 2,50,000/- as a prior charge in the bonus calculations.\nThe shareholders as well as the company would both be naturally interested inter alia in providing the debenture redemption reserves as also meeting the needs of the industry for further expansion. The workmen would no doubt be interested in trying to bridge the gap between their actual wage and the living wage to the extent feasible. This surplus of Rs. 12 lacs would have to be distributed amongst them having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, of course bearing in mind the various considerations indicated above\nIf this contention of the respondents was pushed to its logical extent it would also mean that in the event of the non-fulfilment of the conditions imposed by the Tribunal in the award of bonus herein bringing in savings in the hands of the appellant, the respondents would be entitled to take advantage of those savings also and should be awarded larger amounts by way of bonus, which would really be the result of the claimants entitled to the same not receiving it under certain circumstances-an event which would be purely an extraneous one and unconnected with the contribution of the respondents towards the gross profits earned by the appellant. The Tribunal was, therefore, right in calculating the bonus on an All-India basis\nThe only question which therefore survives is what further bonus, if any, would the respondents be entitled to from the distributable surplus of Rs. 12 lacs. The sum of Rs. 3.50 lacs required for building up the debenture redemption reserve is an all-engrossing need of the appellant and that is a factor which must of necessity be taken into consideration while arriving at the ultimate figure, particularly because such redemption of the debentures would enure not only for the benefit of the Company and its shareholders but also of the workmen employed therein\nHaving regard to all the circumstances of the case, we feel that an award of four months basic wages as aggregate bonus for the year 1954-55 (which by the way was the bonus awarded for the previous year 1953-54 also) would give a fair share to the labour in the distributable surplus, leaving to the shareholders and the company a balance of Rs. 5.22 lacs to be utilised by them not only towards building up of the debenture redemption reserve but also for building up other reserves, which would be utilised for various other purposes indicated above", + "expert_4": "The award made by the Industrial Tribunal, Bombay, in Reference (IT) No. 75 of 1956 between the appellant and the respondents whereby the Industrial Tribunal awarded to the respondents 4 1/2 months basic wages as bonus for the year 1954-55 (year ending June 30, 1955).\nThe appellant is a subsidiary of the Premier Construction Co., Ltd., and manufactures Hume Pipes.\nThe respondents are the workers employed in the appellants factory at Antop Hill, Wadala, Bombay.\nIn October 1955, respondent I who are workmen represented by the Engineering Mazdoor Sabha made a demand for the payment of six-months wages as bonus for the year 1954-55. The matter was also referred to the Conciliation Officer requesting him to initiate Conciliation Proceedings. The Conciliation Proceedings went on before the Conciliation Officer upto March 23, 1956, on which date both the parties arrived at and executed an Agreement to refer the matter to an Industrial Tribunal for adjudication.\nThe Tribunal after hearing the parties came to the conclusion that even if payment of a bonus equal to 4 1/2 months basic wages were made a fair surplus would be left in the hands of the appellant to the tune of Rs. 3.30 lacs and therefore awarded the same subject to the following conditions- \nAny employee who has been dismissed for misconduct resulting in financial loss to the company shall not be entitled to bonus to the extent of the loss caused.\nPersons who are eligible for bonus but who are no longer in the service of the company on the date of the payment shall be paid the same provided that they make a written application for the same within three months of publication of this award.\nSuch bonus shall be paid within one month of receipt of application provided that no claim can be enforced before six weeks from the date this award becomes enforceable.\nBeing aggrieved by the said award of the Tribunal, the appellant applied for and obtained from this Court special leave to appeal against the same under Art. 136 of the Constitution and hence this appeal.\nThe formula evolved by the Full Bench of the Labour Appellate Tribunal in Millowners Association, Bombay v. Rashtreeya Mill Mazdoor Sangh, Bombay(1) is based on this idea that as both labour and capital contribute to the earnings of the industrial concerti, it is fair that labour should derive some benefit, if there is a surplus after meeting prior or necessary charges .\nThe following were prescribed as the first charges on (1) (1950) L.L.J. 1247 gross profits, viz., (1) Provision for depreciation (2) reserves for rehabilitation (3) a return at 6on the paid up capital (4) a return on the working capital at a lesser rate than the return on paid up capital and (5) an estimated amount in respect of the payment of income-tax. The surplus that remained after making the aforesaid deductions would be available for distribution among the three sharers, viz., the shareholders, the industry and the workmen See Muir Mills Co., Ltd. v. Suti Mills Mazdoor Union, Kanpur (1) and Sree Meenakshi Mills Ltd. v. Their Workmen\nThis Full Bench -Formula has been working all throughout the country since its enunciation as aforesaid and has been found to be, in the main, fairly satisfactory.\nWe feel that a formula which has been thus adopted all throughout the country and has so far worked fairly satisfactorily should be adhered, to, though there is scope for certain flexibility in the working thereof in accordance with the exigencies of the situation.\nIn the working of the said formula, however, regard must be had both to the interests of capital and labour. In any given industry there are three interests involved, viz., the shareholders, the Company and the workmen and all these interests have got to get their proper share in the surplus profits ascertained after due provision is made for these prior charges .\nAll these interests (1) 19551 1,s.C.R. 991, 998. (2) 1958 S.C.R 878, 884, have, therefore, got to be duly and properly provided for having regard to the principles of social justice and once surplus profits available for distribution amongst these respective interests are determined after making due provision for the prior charges as aforesaid the Industrial Tribunal adjudicating upon the dispute would have a free hand in the distribution of the same having regard, of course, to the considerations mentioned hereinabove.\nBut so far as the determination of the surplus profits is concerned the formula must be adhered to in its essential particulars as otherwise there would be no stability nor uniformity of practice in regard to the same.\nIt was pointed out by us in Sree Meenakshi Mills Ltd. v.\nTheir Workmen (1) that the whole of the depreciation admissible under the Income-tax Act was not allowable in determining the available surplus.\nThe initial depreciation and the additional depreciation were abnormal additions to the income-tax depreciation and it would not be fair to the workmen if these depreciations were rated as prior charges before the available surplus was ascertained.\nConsiderations on which the grant of initial and additional depreciations might be justified under the Income-tax Act were different from considerations of social justice and fair apportionment on which the Full Bench Formula in regard to the payment of bonus to workmen was based.\nThis was the reason why we held in that case that only normal depreciation including multiple shift depreciation, but not initial or additional depreciation should rank as prior charge.\nWe approved of the decision of the Labour Appellate Tribunal in U. P. Electric Supply Co., Ltd. v.\nTheir Workmen (2) in arriving at the above conclusion and disallowed the claim of the company there to deduct the initial or additional depreciation as prior charge in bonus calculations.\nWe have already expressed in the judgment delivered by us in Associated Cement Co., Ltd. v. Its Workmen (1) that for the purpose of the bonus formula the notional normal depreciation should be deducted from the gross profits calculated on the basis adopted in Surat Electric Supply Co. Staff Union v. Surat Electricity Co., Ltd. (1) and not merely the normal depreciation including multiple shift depreciation allowed by the income-tax authorities as stated in U.\nP. Electric Supply Co., Ltd. v. Their Workmen (3).\nIt is well settled that the actual income-tax payable by the company on the basis of the full statutory depreciation allowed by the income-tax authorities for the relevant accounting year should be taken into account as a prior charge irrespective of any set off allowed by the Income-tax authorities for prior charges or any other considerations such as building up of income-tax reserves for payment of enhanced liabilities of income-tax accruing in future.\nIt is also well settled that the calculations of the surplus available for distribution should be made having regard to the working of the industrial concern in the relevant (1) (1956) L.A.C. 443. (2) 1959 S.C.R. 925. (3) (1955) L.A.C. 659. accounting year without taking into consideration the credits or debits which are referable to the working of the previous years, e.g., the refund of excess profits tax paid in the past or loss of previous years carried forward but written off in the accounting year as also any provision that may have to be made to meet future liabilities, e.g., redemption of debenture stock, or provision for Provident Fund and Gratuity and other benefits, etc., which, however, necessary they may be, cannot be included in the category of prior charges.\nIf regard be had to the principles enunciated above it is clear that the items of Rs. 1.14 lacs representing the Lahore factory balance written off, Rs. 0.34 lacs being patents written off, and Rs. 0.09 lacs shown as loss on sale of Tardeo property cannot be allowed as proper deductions from the gross profits for the purposes of bonus calculations.\nThe first two items represented debits in connection with the working of previous years.\nLoss of the Lahore factory had been incurred during the three previous accounting years and had been carried forward from year to year and the only thing which was done during the year under consideration was that it was then written off as irre- coverable.\nThe patents also had been worked off in previous years and the amounts spent in the purchase thereof were therefore to be written off but had reference to the working of the company during the previous years.\nThe last item of Rs. 0.09 lacs was trivial and was therefore not pressed with the result that all these three items were rightly added back in the calculations of the gross profits of the appellant and the figure of gross profits taken at Rs. 36.21 lacs was correctly arrived at by the Tribunal.\nThe depreciation allowed by the Tribunal was Rs. 9.82 lacs which was the full statutory depreciation allowed by the Income-tax authorities.\nThat should not have been done and the only depreciation allowed should have been the notional normal depreciation which was agreed between the parties before us at Rs. 6.23 lacs.\nWorking the figure of income-tax deducted by the appellant on the basis adopted in Shree Meenakshi Mills Ltd. \n Their Workmen (1) the income-tax on the gross profits of Rs. 36.21 lacs less the statutory depreciation allowed by the income-tax authorities, viz., Rs. 9.82 lacs would be equivalent to 7 annas in the rupee on Rs. 26.39 lacs, i.e., Rs. 11.55 lacs thus leaving a balance of Rs. 16.82 lacs from which the other prior charges would have to be deducted in order to ascertain the distributable surplus. 6 return on the ordinary share capital and 5 return on the preference share capital would come to Rs. 4.30 lacs.\nThe appellant, however, claimed that even on the preference shares 6 return should be allowed and not 5 even though preference shareholders were not entitled to anything beyond 5 under the terms of issue.\nThe appellant obviously relied upon the wording of the formula return at 6 on the paid up capital and contended that the preference shares also being paid up capital it would be entitled to a return of 6 on the preference shares for the purposes of the bonus formula even though in fact it would have to pay only 5 return on the same.\nWe cannot accept this contention.\nEven though the bonus formula is a notional one we cannot ignore the fact that in no event would the appellant be bound to pay to the preference shareholders anything beyond 5 by way of return. The Full Bench Formula cannot be so literally construed.\nThere is bound to be some flexibility therein, the 6 which is prescribed there as the return on paid up capital is not inexorable, and the Tribunals could if the circumstances warrant vary the rate of interest either by increasing or decreasing the same. On the facts of this case however there is no warrant for allowing anything beyond 5 return on preference share capital and the amount of Rs. 4.30 lacs should therefore be deducted as another prior charge from the grsos profits of the appellant. 4 return on reserves used as working capital was calculated merely at a figure of Rs. 0.29 lacs worked out on a total figure of Rs. 7,42,139.\nThe Tribunal (1) 1938 S.C.R. 876. did not take into consideration another sum of Rs. 41,81,196 which represented the depreciation fund which according to the appellant had been used as working capital during the year.\nIf that had been allowed a further sum of Rs. 1.67 lacs should have been added to Rs. 0.29 lacs and the total amount of 4 return on reserves used as working capital would have amounted to Rs. 1.96 lacs.\nTwo arguments were advanced against this contention of the appellant.\nOne was that there was nothing like a depreciation fund, that it merely represented a credit item introduced in the balance-sheet as against the value of the fixed capital at its original cost and would have disappeared as such if the proper accounting basis had been adopted, viz., the fixed block bad been showed at its depreciated value after deducting the amount of depreciation from the original cost.\nSuch book entries, it was contended, did not convert that credit item into a depreciation fund available to the company and there was therefore no basis for the contention that such a depreciation fund ever existed and could be used as working capital in the business.\nThe other was that there was nothing on the record to show that such a depreciation fund, if any, had been, in fact, used as working capital in the business during that year.\nThis being the true position it follows on the facts of the present case that this amount was available for use as working capital and the balance-sheet showed that it was in fact so used.\nMoreover, DO objection was urged in this behalf nor was any finding to the contrary recorded by the Tribunal.\nWe are, therefore, of the opinion that the reasoning adopted by the Tribunal was not correct and the appellant was entitled to 4 return on the reserves used as working capital including the sum of Rs. 41,81,196.\nThe appellant was thus entitled to Rs. 1.96 lacs as the 4 return on reserves used as working capital and not merely Rs. 0.29 lacs as allowed by the Tribunal.\nThe provision for rehabilitation bad been claimed by the appellant at Rs. 1.10 lacs on the basis of 10 of the net profits relying upon para. 20 of the Report of the Committee on Profit Sharing in which the Committee had proposed that 10 of the net profits should compulsorily be set aside for reserves to meet emergencies as well as for rehabilitation, modernization and reasonable expansion.\nNo evidence was at all led by the appellant before the Tribunal showing the cost of the machinery as purchased, the age of the machinery, the estimate for replacement etc., in order to substantiate this claim for rehabilitation and the appellant was content merely to rely upon this recommendation of the Committee on Profit-sharing.\nThis was rightly considered by the Tribunal as insufficient to support the appellants claim, though it allowed for rehabilitation, in addition to the statutory depreciation, the amount for which the appellant had actually made provision, viz., the sum by which the depreciation written off for the year exceeded the statutory depreciation (i. e., Rs. 10,00,000 minus Rs. 9,82,799Rs. 17,201).\nIn this state of affairs it is really impossible for us to allow the appellants claim for rehabilitation in anything beyond the sum of Rs. 0.17 lacs actually allowed by the Tribunal and the claim of the appellant for any further provision for rehabilitation must be disallowed for the purpose of the bonus calculations for the year under consideration.\nIt will however be open to the appellant to claim higher rehabilitation for subsequent years if it can substantiate its claim by adducing proper evidence.\nIn addition to these various sums allowed to the appellant by way of prior charges against the gross profits earned during the accounting year the Tribunal also allowed to the appellant Rs. 2.50 lacs by way of provision for debenture redemption fund.\nThe claim of the appellant was for a sum of Rs. 3.50 lacs for the same\nNo annual provision had been made from profits for redemption of the same inasmuch as until the year 1949 the appellant was not working at a profit.\nFor the year 1950-51, the appellant made a provision for Rs. 75,000 for debenture redemption fund, for 1951.52, Rs. 1,50,000, for 1952-53 Rs. 1,50,000, for 1953-54 Rs. 75,000 and further provision had to be made for redemption of debentures in a sum of Rs. 24,50,000.\nIn so far as 7 more years were left before the due date for redemption the appellant claimed Rs. 3,50,000 as the annual sum to be set apart, though as a matter of fact in the balance-sheet only a provision of Rs. 2,50,000 had been made by it for debenture redemption reserve.\nThe Tribunal pointed out that when the appellant had in its accounts appropriated Rs. 2,50,000 for the debenture redemption fund the claim to have Rs. 3,50,000 for the purposes of bonus formula was clearly untenable.\nIt however was of the opinion that a reasonable provision for redemption fund should be allowed as a prior charge and actually allowed the sum of Rs. 2,50,000 which had been actually provided for the purpose in the balance-sheet, negativing the contention of the respondents that no provision should be allowed for debenture redemption fund in the bonus formula.\nWe are of the opinion that the Tribunal was not justified in allowing the sum of Rs. 2,50,000/- for debenture redemption fund as a prior charge in the bonus calculations.\nThe Full Bench Formula does not envisage any such prior charge.\nIt is no doubt true that capital is shy and it would not be practicable for the industrial concern to raise large amounts by way of fresh debentures when they become due.\nIt is also true that the debentures do not stand on a par with other debts of a concern because the debentureholders would in a conceivable situation be able to enforce their security by bringing the industry to a stand-still by taking over charge of the whole concern.\nThis however does not mean that in the calculations of the distributable surplus the provision for such redemption should be given the status of a prior charge, though of course that would be a relevant con- sideration while distributing the available surplus between the various interests entitled thereto.\nWe are therefore of opinion that the Tribunal was wrong in allowing Rs. 2,50,000/- as a prior charge in the bonus calculations.\nThis disposes of all the contentions which have been urged on behalf of both the parties and calculating the figure on that basis we arrive atthe following Rs. in lacs.\nGross Profit as per Tribudals calculations 36.21 Less Notional Normal Depreciation 6.23 29.98 Less Tax 7 as. in a rupee 11.55 18.43 Less 6 return on ordinary share capital and 5 on preference share capital 4.30 14.13 Less 4 Return on reserves used as working capital 7,42,139 29 41,81,196 1.67 --------------------- 49,23,335 1.96 ------------- 12.17 LessProvision for Rehabilitation 0.17 ------------ Available Surplus 12.00 This would bring the available surplusfor distribution to a sum of Rs. 12 lacs and this would be distributable amongst the shareholders, the company and the workmen concerned.\nIt is not feasible to lay down any rigid formula as to what the proportion of such distribution amongst these various interests should be.\nThe shareholders as well as the company would both be naturally interested inter alia in providing the debenture redemption reserves as also meeting the needs of the industry for further expansion.\nThe workmen would no doubt be interested in trying to bridge the gap between their actual wage and the living wage to the extent feasible.\nThis surplus of Rs. 12 lacs would have to be distributed amongst them having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, of course bearing in mind the various considerations indicated above.\nBefore we arrive at the figure of the actual bonus which it will be appropriate in the circumstances of this case to allow to the workmen, we may advert to one argument which was pressed before us. on their behalf and that was that the bonus calculations should not be made on the basis of the All-India figures which were adopted by the Tribunal but on the basis of the actual amounts which the appellant had paid and would have to pay to the workmen concerned.\nIt was pointed out that the respondents here were only the workmen in the Wadala Factory of the appellant.\n The appellant had, however, paid to the various workmen elsewhere as and by way of bonus sums varying between 4 and 29 of the basic wages for the year in question.\nThe sum of Rs. 1,23,138/- only had been paid in full and final settlement to the workmen in some of the factories and the bonus calculations on an All-India basis would thus work to the advantage of the appellant in so far as they would result in saving to the appellant of the difference between the amounts to which those workmen would be entitled on the basis of the All-India figures adopted by the Tribunal and the amounts actually paid to them as a result of agreements, conciliation or adjudication.\nIt was therefore contended that the calculations should be made after taking into account the savings thus effected by the appellant and only a sum of Rs. 1,23,138 - which was the actual sum paid to those workmen should be taken into account and no more.\nWe are afraid, we cannot accept this contention.\nIf this contention was accepted the respondents before us would have an advantage over those workmen with whom settlements have been made and would get larger amounts by way of bonus merely by reason of the fact that the appellant had managed to settle the claims of those workmen at lesser figures.\nIf this contention of the respondents was pushed to its logical extent it would also mean that in the event of the non-fulfilment of the conditions imposed by the Tribunal in the award of bonus herein bringing in savings in the hands of the appellant, the respondents would be entitled to take advantage of those savings also and should be awarded larger amounts by way of bonus, which would really be the result of the claimants entitled to the same not receiving it under certain circumstances-an event which would be purely an extraneous one and unconnected with the contribution of the respondents towards the gross profits earned by the appellant.\nThe Tribunal was, therefore, right in calculating the bonus on an All-India basis.\nBy our order dated April 12, 1957, the appellant was ordered to pay to the respondents within a fortnight from the date thereof bonus for the year 1954-55 equivalent to two months basic wages that amount has already been paid and works out at Rs. 3.39 lacs on an All-India basis.\nThe only question which therefore survives is what further bonus, if any, would the respondents be entitled to from the distributable surplus of Rs. 12 lacs.\nThe sum of Rs. 3.50 lacs required for building up the debenture redemption reserve is an all-engrossing need of the appellant and that is a factor which must of necessity be taken into consideration while arriving at the ultimate figure, particularly because such redemption of the debentures would enure not only for the benefit of the Company and its shareholders but also of the workmen employed therein.\nHaving regard to all the circumstances of the case, we feel that an award of four months basic wages as aggregate bonus for the year 1954-55 (which by the way was the bonus awarded for the previous year 1953-54 also) would give a fair share to the labour in the distributable surplus, leaving to the shareholders and the company a balance of Rs. 5.22 lacs to be utilised by them not only towards building up of the debenture redemption reserve but also for building up other reserves, which would be utilised for various other purposes indicated above.", + "expert_5": "The formula evolved by the Full Bench of the Labour Appellate Tribunal in Millowners Association, Bombay v. Rashtreeya Mill Mazdoor Sangh, Bombay(1) is based on this idea that as both labour and capital contribute to the earnings of the industrial concerti, it is fair that labour should derive some benefit, if there is a surplus after meeting prior or necessary charges\nThe following were prescribed as the first charges on (1) (1950) L.L.J. 1247 gross profits, viz., (1) Provision for depreciation (2) reserves for rehabilitation (3) a return at 6on the paid up capital (4) a return on the working capital at a lesser rate than the return on paid up capital and (5) an estimated amount in respect of the payment of income-tax.\nThe surplus that remained after making the aforesaid deductions would be available for distribution among the three sharers, viz., the shareholders, the industry and the workmen\nIn the working of the said formula, however, regard must be had both to the interests of capital and labour.\nIn any given industry there are three interests involved, viz., the shareholders, the Company and the workmen and all these interests have got to get their proper share in the surplus profits ascertained after due provision is made for these prior charges .\nThe shareholders may look to larger dividends commensurate with the prosperity of the industrial concern, the company would, apart from rehabilitation and replacement of buildings, plant and machinery, look forward to expansion and satisfaction of other needs of the industry\nthe workmen would certainly be entitled to ask for a share in the surplus profits with a view to bridge the gap between the wages earned by them and the living wages.\nAll these interests (1) 19551 1,s.C.R. 991, 998. (2) 1958 S.C.R 878, 884, have, therefore, got to be duly and properly provided for having regard to the principles of social justice and once surplus profits available for distribution amongst these respective interests are determined after making due provision for the prior charges as aforesaid the Industrial Tribunal adjudicating upon the dispute would have a free hand in the distribution of the same having regard, of course, to the considerations mentioned hereinabove. But so far as the determination of the surplus profits is concerned the formula must be adhered to in its essential particulars as otherwise there would be no stability nor uniformity of practice in regard to the same.\nGross Profit as per Tribudals calculations 36.21 Less Notional Normal Depreciation 6.23 29.98 Less Tax 7 as. in a rupee 11.55 18.43 Less 6 return on ordinary share capital and 5 on preference share capital 4.30 14.13 Less 4 Return on reserves used as working capital 7,42,139 29 41,81,196 1.67 --------------------- 49,23,335 1.96 ------------- 12.17 LessProvision for Rehabilitation 0.17 ------------ Available Surplus 12.00\nThis would bring the available surplusfor distribution to a sum of Rs. 12 lacs and this would be distributable amongst the shareholders, the company and the workmen concerned.\nThe shareholders as well as the company would both be naturally interested inter alia in providing the debenture redemption reserves as also meeting the needs of the industry for further expansion.\nThe workmen would no doubt be interested in trying to bridge the gap between their actual wage and the living wage to the extent feasible.\nThis surplus of Rs. 12 lacs would have to be distributed amongst them having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, of course bearing in mind the various considerations indicated above.\nWe are afraid, we cannot accept this contention. If this contention was accepted the respondents before us would have an advantage over those workmen with whom settlements have been made and would get larger amounts by way of bonus merely by reason of the fact that the appellant had managed to settle the claims of those workmen at lesser figures.\nIf this contention of the respondents was pushed to its logical extent it would also mean that in the event of the non-fulfilment of the conditions imposed by the Tribunal in the award of bonus herein bringing in savings in the hands of the appellant, the respondents would be entitled to take advantage of those savings also and should be awarded larger amounts by way of bonus, which would really be the result of the claimants entitled to the same not receiving it under certain circumstances-an event which would be purely an extraneous one and unconnected with the contribution of the respondents towards the gross profits earned by the appellant.\nThe Tribunal was, therefore, right in calculating the bonus on an All-India basis.\nwhat further bonus\nThe sum of Rs. 3.50 lacs required for building up the debenture redemption reserve is an all-engrossing need of the appellant and that is a factor which must of necessity be taken into consideration while arriving at the ultimate figure, particularly because such redemption of the debentures would enure not only for the benefit of the Company and its shareholders but also of the workmen employed therein.\nan award of four months basic wages as aggregate bonus for the year 1954-55 (which by the way was the bonus awarded for the previous year 1953-54 also) would give a fair share to the labour in the distributable surplus" + }, + "1959_76": { + "expert_1": "Filed in the Court of the Subordinate Judge of Chikodi by one Tukaram Shidappa Borgavi alias Teli (since deceased) and his son Mallappa Tukaram Borgavi alis Teli (1st respondent herein) against the appellants for the redemption of certain mortgaged property and possession thereof free from encumbrances and for other ancillary reliefs.\nOn January 23, 1888, Shiddappa and Annappa executed a usufructuary mortgage (Ex.D-51) in favour of Lalchand Bhavanchand Gujar and Tuljaram Bhavanchand Gujar for Rs. 1,300 made up of Rs. 1,100 due under a previous mortgage and Rs. 200 presently advanced in cash. That deed provided that the mortgage money would be repaid within a period of three years and that the mortgagors would pay the judi and incur the expenses of the Nand Deep and that on failure of the mortgagors to meet the said out goings, the mortgagees would incur the said expenses and add the same to their claim on the mortgage. On March 10, 1900, Shiddappa alone executed a simple mortgage (Ex. D-52) for Rs. 600 in favour of the same mortgagees.\n A part of the consideration for this simple mortgage consisted of moneys borrowed by both the brothers on bonds executed by both of them. This simple mortgage deed provided that the mortgagees would bear the expenses of the Nand Deep and debit the same to the mortgagors in the mortgage account. On March 22, 1900, before the simple mortgage deed was presented for registration, Shidappa, who was the registered occupant, gave a Rajinama under s. 74 of the Bombay Revenue Code recording his desire to submit an unconditional surrender of the above mentioned khata of R. No. 307 from the end of the then current year. On the same day, the mortgagees by a Kabuliyat prayed that the occupancy in the mortgaged property may be granted to them. Both the Rajinama and the Kabuliyat were sanctioned by the Mamlatdar on May 5,1900. Shiddappa having died, Annappa in 1905 applied to the Mamlatdar alleging that the mortgaged property was Devasthan Inam and praying for the cancellation of the transfer in favour of the mortgagees and for placing the mortgaged property in his name. This application was rejected.\n In 1907 Shiddappas son Tukaram (the original first plaintiff herein)and Annappa, the brother of Shiddappa, filed suits against the mortgagees for accounts to be taken under the Deccan Agriculturists Relief Act. That suit having been dismissed, they appealed to the District Court, Belgaum, but that appeal was dismissed on March 15, 1909. Annappa again applied for the lands being put in his possession, but that application also was rejected on August 4, 1910. Thereafter, in 1911 Annappa and Tukaram, the brother and son respectively of Shiddappa, filed C. S. No. 362 of 1911 under the same Deccan Agriculturists Relief Act for the same reliefs. That suit was also dismissed and the appeal there from met with a like fate on March 17,1914. In 1922 Annappa died without any issue. The mortgagee Lalchand died issueless and the mortgagee Tuljaram died leaving a son named Lilachand Tuljaram who became entitled to the entire mortgage securities. On November 1, 1937, Tukaram and, his son Ganpat, alleging that they were the legal representatives of both Shiddappa and Annappa, filed Original Suit No. 586 of 1937, out of which this appeal arises, against the appellants Lilachand and his three sons for the redemption of the mortgages. In the written statement the defendants-appellants pleaded that the deceased Shiddappa having sold the mortgaged property to the mortgagees, the equity of redemption became extinguished and that as Shiddappa alone was the registered occupant, the Rajinama given by him, was valid and binding on Annappa. They further alleged that the plaintiffs were not the heirs of the deceased Annappa, for the latter had died after having transferred his interests in the mortgaged properties to others.\n It transpires that Annappa died in 1922 after having made and published his last will and testament bequeathing his interest in the mortgaged properties to one Krishna Kallappa, that Krishna Kallappa applied for Letters of Administration in respect of Annappas estate and that in spite of the opposition of Tukaram, Letters of Administration with a copy of the will annexed was granted to Krishna Kallappa. Krishna Kallappa having died, his four sons were added as party defendants to this suit and then on their own application they were transposed to the category of plaintiffs.\nThe trial Court held that the Rajinama executed by Shiddappa did not extinguish the title of the mortgagors in the mortgaged property, that the plaintiffs were agriculturists, that they were bound to pay the amount also under the simple mortgage and that on taking accounts the mortgages had redeemed themselves. Accordingly the trial court passed a decree for possession declaring that both the mortgages had been satisfied. The mortgagees, defendants 1 to 4, appealed to the District Court, Belgaum, in Regular Civil Appeal No. 322 of 1940. The District Court held that by the Rajinama, Shiddappa intended to convey the title in the suit land to the mortgagees and hence Shiddappas heirs, the plaintiffs 1 and 2, could not claim redemption of Shiddappas one half share in the suit land. As regards Annappas share, the learned Judge held that the Rajinama had not the effect of transferring the interest of Annappa to the mortgagees and that inasmuch as the mortgages were subsisting, the defendants could not acquire title by adverse possession. In this view he allowed the appeal in part with the result that the suit was dismissed so far as the claims of plaintiffs 1 and 2 were concerned but the claims of plaintiffs 3 to 6 as the legal representatives of Annappa were upheld and they were allowed to redeem Annappas one half share of and in the mortgaged property on payment of one half of the amounts due under the two mortgages. The mortgagee-defendants 1 to 4 appealed to the High Court in Second Appeal No. 754 of 1942 against that part of the decree which rejected their claim to Annappas share and the plaintiffs 1 and 2 also filed Second Appeal No. 1011 of 1942 against the dismissal of their claim for redemption of one half share of Shiddappa in the mortgaged property.\nBoth the appeals were disposed of by a common judgment by Weston, J. The learned Judge held that, so far as Shiddappas share was concerned, the Rajinama was a complete relinquishment of his interest, but as regards Annappas share, he agreed with the District Judges conclusion that Shiddappa could not bind Annappas share by the Rajinama and in this view of the matter he dismissed both the appeals. Against this decree both the parties preferred Letters Patent Appeals, namely, L.P.A. No. 22 of 1945 which was filed by defendants 1 to 4 and L.P.A. No. 16 of 1945 which was filed by plaintiffs 1 and 2. The Division Bench dismissed both the appeals. The present plaintiff No. 1, the son of Tukaram (the deceased son of Shiddappa who was the original plaintiff No. 1) has not come up to this Court and, therefore, the decision of the Division Bench has become final so far as he is concerned. The High Court having refused to grant leave to appeal to this Court, the mortgagees defendants 1 to 4 applied to and obtained from this Court special leave to appeal against the decision of the Division Bench in so far as it upheld the rejection of their claims to Annappas half share in the mortgaged property. Hence the present appeal.\nAs pointed out by the Division Bench in their judgment in the Letters Patent Appeal, this case of Shiddappa having acted as karta was nowhere made by the defendants-appellants in their written statement and, in agreement with the High Court, we declined to allow learned advocate for the appellants to make out such a new case.\nAn absolute relinquishment shall be deemed to to have effect from the close of the current year, and notice thereof must be given before the 31st March in such year, or before such other date as may be from time to time prescribed in this behalf for each district by the Governor in Council. A relinquishment in favour of a specified person may be made at any time. When there are more occupants than one, the notice of relinquishment must be given by the registered occupant and the person, if any, in whose favour an occupancy is relinquished, or, if such occupancy is relinquished in favour of more persons than one, the principal of such persons, must enter into a written agreement to become the registered occupant, and his name shall thereupon be substituted in the records for that of the previous registered occupant.\nThis provision, it is said, makes it clear that so far as the revenue authorities are concerned, it is the registered occupant who represents the entire occupancy and the fact that the notice of relinquishment must, under the section, be given by the registered occupant also supports the contention that the Rajinama passed by the registered occupant binds all the occupants. We are unable to accept this argument as correct.\na relinquishment may be in favour of more persons than one. It is true that the principal one of such persons must enter into a written agreement to become the registered occupant. This is for facilitating the purpose of the Code but it does not mean that the other persons in whose favour the occupancy is relinquished cease to have any right. That their right as occupants remains is clearly recognised by the opening paragraph of the section which gives an occupant a right to relinquish his occupancy either absolutely or in favour of a specified person. This right is given to all occupants, if there are more than one, for the singular includes the plural.\nIt is true that where there are more occupants than one, the notice of relinquishment on behalf of any occupant must be given by the registered occupant. That does not mean, in the absence of any specific pleading and cogent proof, that a notice of relinquishment given by the registered occupant must necessarily be a notice on behalf of all occupants or any particular occupant other than the registered occupant, or that the registered occupant has the right to give such a notice without reference to the other occupants so as to effect their interest in the occupancy.\nIt is true that no specific reference was made in the judgment to s. 74 of the Bombay Land Revenue Code, but the actual decision in that case, the facts of which are very similar to those of the instant case, quite clearly indicates the courts understanding of the law applicable to those facts and that law was nothing but the provisions of s. 74 of the Code.\nIn our opinion, on a correct interpretation of s. 74, where there are more occupants than one in respect of the same occupancy each occupant has his own rights and the fact of registration of one of them as the registered occupant attracts the operation of the Code and confers certain rights or imposes certain obligations on the registered occupant as laid down in the Code but does not take away the rights of other occupants.\n It is true that if any of the occupants other than the registered occupant desires to relinquish his occupancy. he cannot himself give a notice of relinquishment but must give it by and through the registered occupant Nevertheless the registered occupant, in the absence of any authority, express or implied, to be clearly pleaded and strictly proved, has no inherent or independent (1) 22 Bom L.R. 1431, right to give any such notice so as to affect the interests of the other occupants.", + "expert_2": "Shiddappa alone executed a simple mortgage (Ex. D-52) for Rs. 600 in favour of the same mortgagees.\n A part of the consideration for this simple mortgage consisted of moneys borrowed by both the brothers on bonds executed by both of them.\nShidappa, who was the registered occupant, gave a Rajinama under s. 74 of the Bombay Revenue Code recording his desire to submit an unconditional surrender of the above mentioned khata of R. No. 307 from the end of the then current year.\nOn the same day, the mortgagees by a Kabuliyat prayed that the occupancy in the mortgaged property may be granted to them. Both the Rajinama and the Kabuliyat were sanctioned by the Mamlatdar on May 5,1900.\nAs regards Annappas share, the learned Judge held that the Rajinama had not the effect of transferring the interest of Annappa to the mortgagees and that inasmuch as the mortgages were subsisting, the defendants could not acquire title by adverse possession. In this view he allowed the appeal in part with the result that the suit was dismissed so far as the claims of plaintiffs 1 and 2 were concerned but the claims of plaintiffs 3 to 6 as the legal representatives of Annappa were upheld and they were allowed to redeem Annappas one half share of and in the mortgaged property on payment of one half of the amounts due under the two mortgages.\nThe learned Judge held that, so far as Shiddappas share was concerned, the Rajinama was a complete relinquishment of his interest, but as regards Annappas share, he agreed with the District Judges conclusion that Shiddappa could not bind Annappas share by the Rajinama and in this view of the matter he dismissed both the appeals.\nLearned advocate appearing in support of the appeal urges that the Rajinama and the Kabuliyat taken together evidenced a transfer of title from the mortgagors to the mortgagees and, therefore, operated to extinguish the equity of redemption not only of Shiddappa but also of Annappa, for there is sufficient evidence on record that Shiddappa was the manager and karta of the joint family and that in the matter of passing the Rajinama he had acted in that capacity and, therefore, the Rajinama was binding on his brother Annappa.\nWhen there are more occupants than one, the notice of relinquishment must be given by the registered occupant and the person, if any, in whose favour an occupancy is relinquished, or, if such occupancy is relinquished in favour of more persons than one, the principal of such persons, must enter into a written agreement to become the registered occupant, and his name shall thereupon be substituted in the records for that of the previous registered occupant.\nThe concluding paragraph of the section clearly recognises that a relinquishment may be in favour of more persons than one. It is true that the principal one of such persons must enter into a written agreement to become the registered occupant. This is for facilitating the purpose of the Code but it does not mean that the other persons in whose favour the occupancy is relinquished cease to have any right. That their right as occupants remains is clearly recognised by the opening paragraph of the section which gives an occupant a right to relinquish his occupancy either absolutely or in favour of a specified person.\nIt was held that though the conveying brother was a co-mortgagor with the plaintiffs, he had no right to sell their interest in the equity of redemption and that, so far as they, were concerned, he was in the same position as an outsider. It is true that no specific reference was made in the judgment to s. 74 of the Bombay Land Revenue Code, but the actual decision in that case, the facts of which are very similar to those of the instant case, quite clearly indicates the courts understanding of the law applicable to those facts and that law was nothing but the provisions of s. 74 of the Code.\nIn our opinion, on a correct interpretation of s. 74, where there are more occupants than one in respect of the same occupancy each occupant has his own rights and the fact of registration of one of them as the registered occupant attracts the operation of the Code and confers certain rights or imposes certain obligations on the registered occupant as laid down in the Code but does not take away the rights of other occupants.", + "expert_3": "Filed in the Court of the Subordinate Judge of Chikodi by one Tukaram Shidappa Borgavi alias Teli (since deceased) and his son Mallappa Tukaram Borgavi alis Teli (1st respondent herein) against the appellants for the redemption of certain mortgaged property and possession thereof free from encumbrances and for other ancillary reliefs.\nThe mortgaged property consists of R. S. No. 301 which is Devasthan Inam Lands burdened with the obligation to supply oil for Nand Deep, i.e., keeping a lamp always burning before Shri Tholaba Deity in the village of Nipani\nThe said property originally belonged to two brothers Shiddappa and Annappa. The khata of the land, however, stood in the name of Shiddappa as the registered occupant under s. 74 of the Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879\nOn January 23, 1888, Shiddappa and Annappa executed a usufructuary mortgage (Ex.D-51) in favour of Lalchand Bhavanchand Gujar and Tuljaram Bhavanchand Gujar for Rs. 1,300 made up of Rs. 1,100 due under a previous mortgage and Rs. 200 presently advanced in cash. That deed provided that the mortgage money would be repaid within a period of three years and that the mortgagors would pay the judi and incur the expenses of the Nand Deep and that on failure of the mortgagors to meet the said out goings, the mortgagees would incur the said expenses and add the same to their claim on the mortgage. On March 10, 1900, Shiddappa alone executed a simple mortgage\nfor Rs. 600 in favour of the same mortgagees.\n A part of the consideration for this simple mortgage consisted of moneys borrowed by both the brothers on bonds executed by both of them\nThis simple mortgage deed provided that the mortgagees would bear the expenses of the Nand Deep and debit the same to the mortgagors in the mortgage account.\nOn March 22, 1900, before the simple mortgage deed was presented for registration, Shidappa, who was the registered occupant, gave a Rajinama under s. 74 of the Bombay Revenue Code recording his desire to submit an unconditional surrender of the above mentioned khata of R. No. 307 from the end of the then current year. On the same day, the mortgagees by a Kabuliyat prayed that the occupancy in the mortgaged property may be granted to them. Both the Rajinama and the Kabuliyat were sanctioned by the Mamlatdar on May 5,1900\nShiddappa having died, Annappa in 1905 applied to the Mamlatdar alleging that the mortgaged property was Devasthan Inam and praying for the cancellation of the transfer in favour of the mortgagees and for placing the mortgaged property in his name\nThis application was rejected.\nIn 1907 Shiddappas son Tukaram (the original first plaintiff herein)and Annappa, the brother of Shiddappa, filed suits against the mortgagees for accounts to be taken under the Deccan Agriculturists Relief Act. That suit having been dismissed, they appealed to the District Court, Belgaum, but that appeal was dismissed on March 15, 1909. Annappa again applied for the lands being put in his possession, but that application also was rejected on August 4, 1910. Thereafter, in 1911 Annappa and Tukaram, the brother and son respectively of Shiddappa, filed C\nS. No. 362 of 1911 under the same Deccan Agriculturists Relief Act for the same reliefs. That suit was also dismissed and the appeal there from met with a like fate on March 17,1914.\nIn 1922 Annappa died without any issue. The mortgagee Lalchand died issueless and the mortgagee Tuljaram died leaving a son named Lilachand Tuljaram who became entitled to the entire mortgage securities\nOn November 1, 1937, Tukaram and, his son Ganpat, alleging that they were the legal representatives of both Shiddappa and Annappa, filed Original Suit No. 586 of 1937, out of which this appeal arises, against the appellants Lilachand and his three sons for the redemption of the mortgages. In the written statement the defendants-appellants pleaded that the deceased Shiddappa having sold the mortgaged property to the mortgagees, the equity of redemption became extinguished and that as Shiddappa alone was the registered occupant, the Rajinama given by him, was valid and binding on Annappa. They further alleged that the plaintiffs were not the heirs of the deceased Annappa, for the latter had died after having transferred his interests in the mortgaged properties to others.\nIt transpires that Annappa died in 1922 after having made and published his last will and testament bequeathing his interest in the mortgaged properties to one Krishna Kallappa, that Krishna Kallappa applied for Letters of Administration in respect of Annappas estate and that in spite of the opposition of Tukaram, Letters of Administration with a copy of the will annexed was granted to Krishna Kallappa.\nThe trial Court held that the Rajinama executed by Shiddappa did not extinguish the title of the mortgagors in the mortgaged property, that the plaintiffs were agriculturists, that they were bound to pay the amount also under the simple mortgage and that on taking accounts the mortgages had redeemed themselves. Accordingly the trial court passed a decree for possession declaring that both the mortgages had been satisfied\nThe mortgagees, defendants 1 to 4, appealed to the District Court, Belgaum, in Regular Civil Appeal No. 322 of 1940. The District Court held that by the Rajinama, Shiddappa intended to convey the title in the suit land to the mortgagees and hence Shiddappas heirs, the plaintiffs 1 and 2, could not claim redemption of Shiddappas one half share in the suit land. As regards Annappas share, the learned Judge held that the Rajinama had not the effect of transferring the interest of Annappa to the mortgagees and that inasmuch as the mortgages were subsisting, the defendants could not acquire title by adverse possession\nIn this view he allowed the appeal in part with the result that the suit was dismissed so far as the claims of plaintiffs 1 and 2 were concerned but the claims of plaintiffs 3 to 6 as the legal representatives of Annappa were upheld and they were allowed to redeem Annappas one half share of and in the mortgaged property on payment of one half of the amounts due under the two mortgages. The mortgagee-defendants 1 to 4 appealed to the High Court in Second Appeal No. 754 of 1942 against that part of the decree which rejected their claim to Annappas share and the plaintiffs 1 and 2 also filed Second Appeal No. 1011 of 1942 against the dismissal of their claim for redemption of one half share of Shiddappa in the mortgaged property.\nBoth the appeals were disposed of by a common judgment by Weston, J. The learned Judge held that, so far as Shiddappas share was concerned, the Rajinama was a complete relinquishment of his interest, but as regards Annappas share, he agreed with the District Judges conclusion that Shiddappa could not bind Annappas share by the Rajinama and in this view of the matter he dismissed both the appeals. Against this decree both the parties preferred Letters Patent Appeals,\nThe Division Bench dismissed both the appeals. The present plaintiff No. 1, the son of Tukaram (the deceased son of Shiddappa who was the original plaintiff No. 1) has not come up to this Court and, therefore, the decision of the Division Bench has become final so far as he is concerned. The High Court having refused to grant leave to appeal to this Court, the mortgagees defendants 1 to 4 applied to and obtained from this Court special leave to appeal against the decision of the Division Bench in so far as it upheld the rejection of their claims to Annappas half share in the mortgaged property. Hence the present appeal\nSection 74 of the Bombay Land Revenue Act, as it stood at all material times, ran as follows An occupant may, by giving written notice to the Mamlatdar or Mahalkari, relinquish his occupancy, either absolutely or in favour of a specified person provided that such relinquishment applied to the entire occupancy or to whole survey numbers, or recognized shares of Survey Numbers. An absolute relinquishment shall be deemed to to have effect from the close of the current year, and notice thereof must be given before the 31st March in such year, or before such other date as may be from time to time prescribed in this behalf for each district by the Governor in Council.\nA relinquishment in favour of a specified person may be made at any time. When there are more occupants than one, the notice of relinquishment must be given by the registered occupant and the person, if any, in whose favour an occupancy is relinquished, or, if such occupancy is relinquished in favour of more persons than one, the principal of such persons, must enter into a written agreement to become the registered occupant, and his name shall thereupon be substituted in the records for that of the previous registered occupant\nIt is true that the principal one of such persons must enter into a written agreement to become the registered occupant. This is for facilitating the purpose of the Code but it does not mean that the other persons in whose favour the occupancy is relinquished cease to have any right. That their right as occupants remains is clearly recognised by the opening paragraph of the section which gives an occupant a right to relinquish his occupancy either absolutely or in favour of a specified person. This right is given to all occupants, if there are more than one, for the singular includes the plural\nIt is true that where there are more occupants than one, the notice of relinquishment on behalf of any occupant must be given by the registered occupant\nThat does not mean, in the absence of any specific pleading and cogent proof, that a notice of relinquishment given by the registered occupant must necessarily be a notice on behalf of all occupants or any particular occupant other than the registered occupant, or that the registered occupant has the right to give such a notice without reference to the other occupants so as to effect their interest in the occupancy.\nTurning to the Rajinama, it is clear that Shiddappa did not purport to file, the same on behalf of Annappa nor had he any right to do so by reason only of his being the registered occupant\nIn Lalchand Sakharam Marwadi v. Khendu Kedu Ughade (1) one out of four brother mortgagors, who was the registered occupant of the mortgage land, passed a Rajinama of the land in favour of the mortgagee, who executed a Kabuliyat for the same. The remaining three mortgagors sued to redeem the mortgage alleging that the Rajinama passed by their brother conveyed only his interest and nothing more. It was held that though the conveying brother was a co-mortgagor with the plaintiffs, he had no right to sell their interest in the equity of redemption and that, so far as they, were concerned, he was in the same position as an outsider\nIt is true that no specific reference was made in the judgment to s. 74 of the Bombay Land Revenue Code, but the actual decision in that case, the facts of which are very similar to those of the instant case, quite clearly indicates the courts understanding of the law applicable to those facts and that law was nothing but the provisions of s. 74 of the Code\nIn our opinion, on a correct interpretation of s. 74, where there are more occupants than one in respect of the same occupancy each occupant has his own rights and the fact of registration of one of them as the registered occupant attracts the operation of the Code and confers certain rights or imposes certain obligations on the registered occupant as laid down in the Code but does not take away the rights of other occupants.\n It is true that if any of the occupants other than the registered occupant desires to relinquish his occupancy. he cannot himself give a notice of relinquishment but must give it by and through the registered occupant Nevertheless the registered occupant, in the absence of any authority, express or implied, to be clearly pleaded and strictly proved, has no inherent or independent (1) 22 Bom L.R. 1431, right to give any such notice so as to affect the interests of the other occupants", + "expert_4": "Filed in the Court of the Subordinate Judge of Chikodi by one Tukaram Shidappa Borgavi alias Teli (since deceased) and his son Mallappa Tukaram Borgavi alis Teli (1st respondent herein) against the appellants for the redemption of certain mortgaged property and possession thereof free from encumbrances and for other ancillary reliefs.\nThe mortgaged property consists of R. S. No. 301 which is Devasthan Inam Lands burdened with the obligation to supply oil for Nand Deep, i.e., keeping a lamp always burning before Shri Tholaba Deity in the village of Nipani.\nOn January 23, 1888, Shiddappa and Annappa executed a usufructuary mortgage (Ex.D-51) in favour of Lalchand Bhavanchand Gujar and Tuljaram Bhavanchand Gujar for Rs. 1,300 made up of Rs. 1,100 due under a previous mortgage and Rs. 200 presently advanced in cash.\nThat deed provided that the mortgage money would be repaid within a period of three years and that the mortgagors would pay the judi and incur the expenses of the Nand Deep and that on failure of the mortgagors to meet the said out goings, the mortgagees would incur the said expenses and add the same to their claim on the mortgage.\nOn March 10, 1900, Shiddappa alone executed a simple mortgage (Ex. D-52) for Rs. 600 in favour of the same mortgagees.\nThis simple mortgage deed provided that the mortgagees would bear the expenses of the Nand Deep and debit the same to the mortgagors in the mortgage account.\nOn March 22, 1900, before the simple mortgage deed was presented for registration, Shidappa, who was the registered occupant, gave a Rajinama under s. 74 of the Bombay Revenue Code recording his desire to submit an unconditional surrender of the above mentioned khata of R. No. 307 from the end of the then current year. On the same day, the mortgagees by a Kabuliyat prayed that the occupancy in the mortgaged property may be granted to them.\nBoth the Rajinama and the Kabuliyat were sanctioned by the Mamlatdar on May 5,1900.\nOn November 1, 1937, Tukaram and, his son Ganpat, alleging that they were the legal representatives of both Shiddappa and Annappa, filed Original Suit No. 586 of 1937, out of which this appeal arises, against the appellants Lilachand and his three sons for the redemption of the mortgages.\nIn the written statement the defendants-appellants pleaded that the deceased Shiddappa having sold the mortgaged property to the mortgagees, the equity of redemption became extinguished and that as Shiddappa alone was the registered occupant, the Rajinama given by him, was valid and binding on Annappa.\nThey further alleged that the plaintiffs were not the heirs of the deceased Annappa, for the latter had died after having transferred his interests in the mortgaged properties to others.\nThe trial Court held that the Rajinama executed by Shiddappa did not extinguish the title of the mortgagors in the mortgaged property, that the plaintiffs were agriculturists, that they were bound to pay the amount also under the simple mortgage and that on taking accounts the mortgages had redeemed themselves.\nAccordingly the trial court passed a decree for possession declaring that both the mortgages had been satisfied.\nThe mortgagees, defendants 1 to 4, appealed to the District Court, Belgaum, in Regular Civil Appeal No. 322 of 1940.\nThe District Court held that by the Rajinama, Shiddappa intended to convey the title in the suit land to the mortgagees and hence Shiddappas heirs, the plaintiffs 1 and 2, could not claim redemption of Shiddappas one half share in the suit land.\nAs regards Annappas share, the learned Judge held that the Rajinama had not the effect of transferring the interest of Annappa to the mortgagees and that inasmuch as the mortgages were subsisting, the defendants could not acquire title by adverse possession.\nIn this view he allowed the appeal in part with the result that the suit was dismissed so far as the claims of plaintiffs 1 and 2 were concerned but the claims of plaintiffs 3 to 6 as the legal representatives of Annappa were upheld and they were allowed to redeem Annappas one half share of and in the mortgaged property on payment of one half of the amounts due under the two mortgages.\nThe mortgagee-defendants 1 to 4 appealed to the High Court in Second Appeal No. 754 of 1942 against that part of the decree which rejected their claim to Annappas share and the plaintiffs 1 and 2 also filed Second Appeal No. 1011 of 1942 against the dismissal of their claim for redemption of one half share of Shiddappa in the mortgaged property.\nThe learned Judge held that, so far as Shiddappas share was concerned, the Rajinama was a complete relinquishment of his interest, but as regards Annappas share, he agreed with the District Judges conclusion that Shiddappa could not bind Annappas share by the Rajinama and in this view of the matter he dismissed both the appeals.\nAgainst this decree both the parties preferred Letters Patent Appeals, namely, L.P.A.\nThe Division Bench dismissed both the appeals.\nThe present plaintiff No. 1, the son of Tukaram (the deceased son of Shiddappa who was the original plaintiff No. 1) has not come up to this Court and, therefore, the decision of the Division Bench has become final so far as he is concerned.\nThe plaintiffs respondents, who are the legal representatives of Annappa and against whom the present appeal is directed, have not entered appearance in this appeal.\nLearned advocate appearing in support of the appeal urges that the Rajinama and the Kabuliyat taken together evidenced a transfer of title from the mortgagors to the mortgagees and, therefore, operated to extinguish the equity of redemption not only of Shiddappa but also of Annappa, for there is sufficient evidence on record that Shiddappa was the manager and karta of the joint family and that in the matter of passing the Rajinama he had acted in that capacity and, therefore, the Rajinama was binding on his brother Annappa.\nAs pointed out by the Division Bench in their judgment in the Letters Patent Appeal, this case of Shiddappa having acted as karta was nowhere made by the defendants-appellants in their written statement and, in agreement with the High Court, we declined to allow learned advocate for the appellants to make out such a new case.\nlearned advocate for the appellants urges that under s. 74 of the Bombay Land Revenue Code, as Shiddappa was the registered occupant, the Rajinama filed by him operated upon the entire occupancy and amounted to a relinquishment of the rights of both the brothers Shiddappa and Annappa.\nSection 74 of the Bombay Land Revenue Act, as it stood at all material times, ran as follows An occupant may, by giving written notice to the Mamlatdar or Mahalkari, relinquish his occupancy, either absolutely or in favour of a specified person provided that such relinquishment applied to the entire occupancy or to whole survey numbers, or recognized shares of Survey Numbers.\nAn absolute relinquishment shall be deemed to to have effect from the close of the current year, and notice thereof must be given before the 31st March in such year, or before such other date as may be from time to time prescribed in this behalf for each district by the Governor in Council. A relinquishment in favour of a specified person may be made at any time. When there are more occupants than one, the notice of relinquishment must be given by the registered occupant and the person, if any, in whose favour an occupancy is relinquished, or, if such occupancy is relinquished in favour of more persons than one, the principal of such persons, must enter into a written agreement to become the registered occupant, and his name shall thereupon be substituted in the records for that of the previous registered occupant.\nReliance is placed on the concluding paragraph of the section which provides that when a relinquishment is made in favour of more persons than one the principal one of such persons must enter into a written agreement to become the registered occupant and his name shall thereupon be substituted in the records for that of the previous registered occupant.\nThis provision, it is said, makes it clear that so far as the revenue authorities are concerned, it is the registered occupant who represents the entire occupancy and the fact that the notice of relinquishment must, under the section, be given by the registered occupant also supports the contention that the Rajinama passed by the registered occupant binds all the occupants.\nWe are unable to accept this argument as correct.\nThe concluding paragraph of the section clearly recognises that a relinquishment may be in favour of more persons than one. It is true that the principal one of such persons must enter into a written agreement to become the registered occupant. This is for facilitating the purpose of the Code but it does not mean that the other persons in whose favour the occupancy is relinquished cease to have any right.\nThat their right as occupants remains is clearly recognised by the opening paragraph of the section which gives an occupant a right to relinquish his occupancy either absolutely or in favour of a specified person.\nThis right is given to all occupants, if there are more than one, for the singular includes the plural.\nIt is true that where there are more occupants than one, the notice of relinquishment on behalf of any occupant must be given by the registered occupant. That does not mean, in the absence of any specific pleading and cogent proof, that a notice of relinquishment given by the registered occupant must necessarily be a notice on behalf of all occupants or any particular occupant other than the registered occupant, or that the registered occupant has the right to give such a notice without reference to the other occupants so as to effect their interest in the occupancy.\nTurning to the Rajinama, it is clear that Shiddappa did not purport to file, the same on behalf of Annappa nor had he any right to do so by reason only of his being the registered occupant.\nIn Lalchand Sakharam Marwadi v. Khendu Kedu Ughade\nIt was held that though the conveying brother was a co-mortgagor with the plaintiffs, he had no right to sell their interest in the equity of redemption and that, so far as they, were concerned, he was in the same position as an outsider.\nIt is true that no specific reference was made in the judgment to s. 74 of the Bombay Land Revenue Code, but the actual decision in that case, the facts of which are very similar to those of the instant case, quite clearly indicates the courts understanding of the law applicable to those facts and that law was nothing but the provisions of s. 74 of the Code.\nIn our opinion, on a correct interpretation of s. 74, where there are more occupants than one in respect of the same occupancy each occupant has his own rights and the fact of registration of one of them as the registered occupant attracts the operation of the Code and confers certain rights or imposes certain obligations on the registered occupant as laid down in the Code but does not take away the rights of other occupants.\nIt is true that if any of the occupants other than the registered occupant desires to relinquish his occupancy. he cannot himself give a notice of relinquishment but must give it by and through the registered occupant Nevertheless the registered occupant, in the absence of any authority, express or implied, to be clearly pleaded and strictly proved, has no inherent or independent (1) 22 Bom L.R. 1431, right to give any such notice so as to affect the interests of the other occupants.", + "expert_5": "this case of Shiddappa having acted as karta was nowhere made by the defendants-appellants in their written statement and, in agreement with the High Court, we declined to allow learned advocate for the appellants to make out such a new case.\nAn occupant may, by giving written notice to the Mamlatdar or Mahalkari, relinquish his occupancy, either absolutely or in favour of a specified person provided that such relinquishment applied to the entire occupancy or to whole survey numbers, or recognized shares of Survey Numbers.\nA relinquishment in favour of a specified person may be made at any time. When there are more occupants than one, the notice of relinquishment must be given by the registered occupant and the person, if any, in whose favour an occupancy is relinquished, or, if such occupancy is relinquished in favour of more persons than one, the principal of such persons, must enter into a written agreement to become the registered occupant, and his name shall thereupon be substituted in the records for that of the previous registered occupant.\nThe concluding paragraph of the section clearly recognises that a relinquishment may be in favour of more persons than one.\nIt is true that the principal one of such persons must enter into a written agreement to become the registered occupant.\nThis is for facilitating the purpose of the Code\nit does not mean that the other persons in whose favour the occupancy is relinquished cease to have any right.\nThat their right as occupants remains is clearly recognised by the opening paragraph of the section which gives an occupant a right to relinquish his occupancy either absolutely or in favour of a specified person.\nThis right is given to all occupants, if there are more than one, for the singular includes the plural. It is true that where there are more occupants than one, the notice of relinquishment on behalf of any occupant must be given by the registered occupant.\nThat does not mean, in the absence of any specific pleading and cogent proof, that a notice of relinquishment given by the registered occupant must necessarily be a notice on behalf of all occupants or any particular occupant other than the registered occupant, or that the registered occupant has the right to give such a notice without reference to the other occupants so as to effect their interest in the occupancy.\nTurning to the Rajinama, it is clear that Shiddappa did not purport to file, the same on behalf of Annappa nor had he any right to do so by reason only of his being the registered occupant.\nIn Lalchand Sakharam Marwadi v. Khendu Kedu Ughade (1) one out of four brother mortgagors, who was the registered occupant of the mortgage land, passed a Rajinama of the land in favour of the mortgagee, who executed a Kabuliyat for the same. The remaining three mortgagors sued to redeem the mortgage alleging that the Rajinama passed by their brother conveyed only his interest and nothing more. It was held that though the conveying brother was a co-mortgagor with the plaintiffs, he had no right to sell their interest in the equity of redemption and that, so far as they, were concerned, he was in the same position as an outsider. It is true that no specific reference was made in the judgment to s. 74 of the Bombay Land Revenue Code, but the actual decision in that case, the facts of which are very similar to those of the instant case, quite clearly indicates the courts understanding of the law applicable to those facts and that law was nothing but the provisions of s. 74 of the Code.\nIn our opinion, on a correct interpretation of s. 74, where there are more occupants than one in respect of the same occupancy each occupant has his own rights and the fact of registration of one of them as the registered occupant attracts the operation of the Code and confers certain rights or imposes certain obligations on the registered occupant as laid down in the Code but does not take away the rights of other occupants.\nIt is true that if any of the occupants other than the registered occupant desires to relinquish his occupancy. he cannot himself give a notice of relinquishment but must give it by and through the registered occupant\nNevertheless the registered occupant, in the absence of any authority, express or implied, to be clearly pleaded and strictly proved, has no inherent or independent (1) 22 Bom L.R. 1431, right to give any such notice so as to affect the interests of the other occupants." + }, + "1960_10": { + "expert_1": "As regards these orders the appellants contend that they run counter to the pronouncements of this Court in Punjab National Bank Ltd. v. Sri Ram Kanwar, Industrial Tribunal, Delhi (1).\nThis contention, we are bound to say, is correct.\nWhatever might have been said in support of the view taken by the Tribunals in ordering payment of these allowances and of granting special leave to workmen attending proceedings of necessity, if the question was res integra we are bound by the authority of Punjab National Banks Case (1) to (1) 1957 S.C.R. 220. hold that no such allowances are payable and no such order garanting leave may be made. The order of the Tribunals below allowing travelling allowance and balting allowance and special leave to workmen attending proceedings of necessity, must therefore be set aside.\nThat question is whether retaining allowance should be paid to unskilled workers in these industries during the off season.\nOn the question of retaining allowance the main contentions on behalf of the employers were that agriculture was the primary occupation of these persons and the employment in the sugar factory was merely a subsidiary occupation, that the claim for retaining allowance was really in the nature of unemployment relief which it was the duty of the State and not the industry to give, that the relationship between the employers and these employees does not exist in off season and so no payment of anything in tile character of wages could possibly be claimed by the labour. The Tribunal overruled all these objections. It was of opinion that the working season in the factory completely covers the paddy harvesting season in North Bihar, where most of the factories are situated so that the workmen the bulk of whom belong to the landless labourers class in the rural areas do not obtain employment in the off season.\n It also pointed out that the seasonal employees are entitled to provident fund, gratuity and also bonus and that their connection with the employers is not broken during the off season. Accordingly it awarded retaining allowance of 5 to all unskilled employees-to be paid every year at the beginning of the season when they report themselves to duty. In agreeing with the Tribunals conclusion the Appellate Tribunal pointed out further that the grant of seasonal allowance to unskilled labour in the industry would promote stability, good relations and efficiency. The question whether the retaining allowance should be paid to seasonal workers during the off season is one of great complexity. A measure of the complexity is provided by the conflict in the view expressed by many committees who examined the matter.\nWhile it will serve no useful purpose to set out these different views and the reasons given in support thereof, it is proper to mention that with the exception of the Labour Enquiry Committee no committee ever recommended payment of retaining allowance to unskilled workmen, though several of these recommended payment of such allowance to skilled and semi-skilled workmen. When the matter comes before the Tribunals for adjudication they have to decide the matter on the materials before them and it is not possible to derive much assistance from these reports of the committees.\n The real difficulty in coming to a conclusion lies in the fact that while there is no doubt on the one hand of the plight of the seasonal workmen during the off season, if they during such period remain prartically unemployed, there is some force also in the argument that it is neither just nor fair to treat these unfortunate people as the special responsibility of the particular industry or the factory where they are seasonally employed.\nIt is difficult not to agree with the opinion that the relief of unemployment by arranging suitable alternative employment or an alleviation of the distress of such seasonally unemployed persons by providing unemployment insurance benefits or by other modes is primarily the function of the government of the country. To say that, is, however, not to say that the industry where they are seasonally employed should look on unconcerned and play no part in alleviating the distress of the people who have contributed to the prosperity of the industry by their labour, even though for only a part of the year.\nWhile these considerations on either side are common to claims for retaining allowance for all seasonal workmen in all industries, the special facts and circumstances of the categories of workmen and different local circumstances in different industries play an important part in deciding the question. Thus skilled and semi-skilled workers have often been able to put forward a strong case by pointing out that the specialized skill acquired by them makes it difficult for them to obtain suitable alternative employment in the off season.\nWe do no think it will be fair to say that merely because the employers have agreed to pay retaining allowance to skilled labour their opposition to such payment of some such allowance to unskilled labour is unjustified.\nIn deciding whether the principles of social justice which it is the aim of industrial adjudication to apply justify the payment of retaining allowance to unskilled workmen in these sugar industries, it is necessary to take into account (a) the opportunities of alternative employment in the off season that will be available to such workmen (b) the degree in which such workmen can be said to have become attached to the particular factory where they work (c) the likely benefit to the industry if such workmen are induced to return to the factory by the incentive of retaining allowance to be paid when the season commences (d) the capacity of the industry to bear the burden of retaining allowance.\nThe capacity of the appellant-employers to bear the additional burden resultant from the 5 retaining allowance ordered by the Tribunals below has not been disputed before us. The position is however far from clear as regards the existence of alternative opportunities available to unskilled labour in the Off season. It was found, and we must proceed on the basis, rightly found, that the working season of the sugar industry in North Bihar where most of the factories concerned in the present-appeals are situated, completely covers the paddy harvesting season. That however is slender material for any conclusion as regards the existence of opportunities of alternative employment for these unskilled workmen. The appellate Tribunal has said that the grant of seasonal allowance to unskilled labour in the industry will promote stability, good relations and efficiency. Except in so far as this conclusion is based on the general probability that newly recruited labour at the commencement of the season is likely to be less efficient and less disciplined than men who have worked in previous seasons, this does not appear to have been based on any concrete evidence on the point.\nIt appears to be clear that once the season is over the unskilled workmen cease to have any contractual relations with the employers and may rejoin on the com- mencement of the season or may not rejoin at their sweet will. As regards the observations of the Tribunal that seasonal employees are entitled to the benefit of provident fund, gratuity and also bonus which shows that in fact their connection with the employers is not broken the materials on the record Are too scanty for arriving at any definite conclusion.\nIn consideration of the nature and extent of the materials on the record we are of opinion that for alleviating the distress of unskilled workmen in these sugar factories, with whom we are concerned in the present appeals a much better course will be to raise the wage structure with an eye to this fact that for a part of the off season at least when they remain unemployed than to pay a retaining allowance for the entire off season.\nThe appellants counsel readily agrees that the fact that these unskilled workmen find employment in the sugar factories only for a few months and are in comparative difficulty in the matter of finding employment during the remaining months, should be taken into consideration in fixing their wages.\nThe interests of both the employers and labour will, we think, be best served if instead of confirming the order made by the Appellate Tribunal as regards the retaining allowance the workmen will raise this question of raising their wages in view of the seasonal nature of their employment before this Wage Board.", + "expert_2": "The appellants-companies, the employers, in these sugar industries also challenge the correctness of the order made by the Industrial Tribunal and confirmed by the Labour Appellate Tribunal awarding the workmen attending the proceedings before the Industrial Tribunal, wages, travelling allowance and halting allowance and further directing that the workmen attending these proceedings would be treated on special leave with pay for the period of such attendance.\nThat question is whether retaining allowance should be paid to unskilled workers in these industries during the off season.\nThe real difficulty in coming to a conclusion lies in the fact that while there is no doubt on the one hand of the plight of the seasonal workmen during the off season, if they during such period remain prartically unemployed, there is some force also in the argument that it is neither just nor fair to treat these unfortunate people as the special responsibility of the particular industry or the factory where they are seasonally employed.\nIt is obvious as has been noticed by both the Tribunals below, that the employers feel that there is such a glut in the supply of unskilled labour in Bihar that retaining allowance or no retaining allowance a sufficient supply will be available for the industries.\nWe do no think it will be fair to say that merely because the employers have agreed to pay retaining allowance to skilled labour their opposition to such payment of some such allowance to unskilled labour is unjustified.\nIn deciding whether the principles of social justice which it is the aim of industrial adjudication to apply justify the payment of retaining allowance to unskilled workmen in these sugar industries, it is necessary to take into account (a) the opportunities of alternative employment in the off season that will be available to such workmen (b) the degree in which such workmen can be said to have become attached to the particular factory where they work (c) the likely benefit to the industry if such workmen are induced to return to the factory by the incentive of retaining allowance to be paid when the season commences (d) the capacity of the industry to bear the burden of retaining allowance.\nIt was found, and we must proceed on the basis, rightly found, that the working season of the sugar industry in North Bihar where most of the factories concerned in the present-appeals are situated, completely covers the paddy harvesting season\nExcept in so far as this conclusion is based on the general probability that newly recruited labour at the commencement of the season is likely to be less efficient and less disciplined than men who have worked in previous seasons, this does not appear to have been based on any concrete evidence on the point.\n Nor is it clear from the materials on the record that unskilled workmen employed in a particular factory consider themselves attached to, that factory. It appears to be clear that once the season is over the unskilled workmen cease to have any contractual relations with the employers and may rejoin on the com- mencement of the season or may not rejoin at their sweet will.\nAs regards the observations of the Tribunal that seasonal employees are entitled to the benefit of provident fund, gratuity and also bonus which shows that in fact their connection with the employers is not broken the materials on the record Are too scanty for arriving at any definite conclusion.\nIn consideration of the nature and extent of the materials on the record we are of opinion that for alleviating the distress of unskilled workmen in these sugar factories, with whom we are concerned in the present appeals a much better course will be to raise the wage structure with an eye to this fact that for a part of the off season at least when they remain unemployed than to pay a retaining allowance for the entire off season.", + "expert_3": "The appellants-companies, the employers, in these sugar industries also challenge the correctness of the order made by the Industrial Tribunal and confirmed by the Labour Appellate Tribunal awarding the workmen attending the proceedings before the Industrial Tribunal, wages, travelling allowance and halting allowance and further directing that the workmen attending these proceedings would be treated on special leave with pay for the period of such attendance. As regards these orders the appellants contend that they run counter to the pronouncements of this Court in Punjab National Bank Ltd. v. Sri Ram Kanwar, Industrial Tribunal, Delhi (1). This contention, we are bound to say, is correct\nWhatever might have been said in support of the view taken by the Tribunals in ordering payment of these allowances and of granting special leave to workmen attending proceedings of necessity, if the question was res integra we are bound by the authority of Punjab National Banks Case (1) to (1) 1957 S.C.R. 220. hold that no such allowances are payable and no such order garanting leave may be made. The order of the Tribunals below allowing travelling allowance and balting allowance and special leave to workmen attending proceedings of necessity, must therefore be set aside\nquestion is whether retaining allowance should be paid to unskilled workers in these industries during the off season.\nIn 1950 a reference as ultimately made to Mr. Justice B. P. Sinha (as he then was) as regards these disputes about retaining allowance. The award made by him provided for retaining allowance to skilled and semiskilled workmen but none to unskilled workmen. Before the Appellate Tribunal who heard the appeal against that award the labourers and employers came to an agreement that no retaining allowance would be payable to the unskilled workmen. This award was in operation for a period of two years but was thereafter determined by notice given by workmen followed up by similar notice by employers.\nThe Tribunal\nwas of opinion that the working season in the factory completely covers the paddy harvesting season in North Bihar, where most of the factories are situated so that the workmen the bulk of whom belong to the landless labourers class in the rural areas do not obtain employment in the off season.\n It also pointed out that the seasonal employees are entitled to provident fund, gratuity and also bonus and that their connection with the employers is not broken during the off season. Accordingly it awarded retaining allowance of 5 to all unskilled employees-to be paid every year at the beginning of the season when they report themselves to duty.\nIn agreeing with the Tribunals conclusion the Appellate Tribunal pointed out further that the grant of seasonal allowance to unskilled labour in the industry would promote stability, good relations and efficiency\nThe question whether the retaining allowance should be paid to seasonal workers during the off season is one of great complexity. A measure of the complexity is provided by the conflict in the view expressed by many committees who examined the matter. While it will serve no useful purpose to set out these different views and the reasons given in support thereof, it is proper to mention that with the exception of the Labour Enquiry Committee no committee ever recommended payment of retaining allowance to unskilled workmen, though several of these recommended payment of such allowance to skilled and semi-skilled workmen.\nThe real difficulty in coming to a conclusion lies in the fact that while there is no doubt on the one hand of the plight of the seasonal workmen during the off season, if they during such period remain prartically unemployed, there is some force also in the argument that it is neither just nor fair to treat these unfortunate people as the special responsibility of the particular industry or the factory where they are seasonally employed\nIt is difficult not to agree with the opinion that the relief of unemployment by arranging suitable alternative employment or an alleviation of the distress of such seasonally unemployed persons by providing unemployment insurance benefits or by other modes is primarily the function of the government of the country. To say that, is, however, not to say that the industry where they are seasonally employed should look on unconcerned and play no part in alleviating the distress of the people who have contributed to the prosperity of the industry by their labour, even though for only a part of the year\nWhile these considerations on either side are common to claims for retaining allowance for all seasonal workmen in all industries, the special facts and circumstances of the categories of workmen and different local circumstances in different industries play an important part in deciding the question\nIn the present appeals we are concerned with the case of unskilled workmen only.\n It is obvious as has been noticed by both the Tribunals below, that the employers feel that there is such a glut in the supply of unskilled labour in Bihar that retaining allowance or no retaining allowance a sufficient supply will be available for the industries\nThat is why the employers contend that they ought not to be asked in an industrial adjudication to pay retaining allowance to unskilled labour. We do no think it will be fair to say that merely because the employers have agreed to pay retaining allowance to skilled labour their opposition to such payment of some such allowance to unskilled labour is unjustified.\nIn deciding whether the principles of social justice which it is the aim of industrial adjudication to apply justify the payment of retaining allowance to unskilled workmen in these sugar industries, it is necessary to take into account (a) the opportunities of alternative employment in the off season that will be available to such workmen (b) the degree in which such workmen can be said to have become attached to the particular factory where they work (c) the likely benefit to the industry if such workmen are induced to return to the factory by the incentive of retaining allowance to be paid when the season commences (d) the capacity of the industry to bear the burden of retaining allowance.\n The capacity of the appellant-employers to bear the additional burden resultant from the 5 retaining allowance ordered by the Tribunals below has not been disputed before us. The position is however far from clear as regards the existence of alternative opportunities available to unskilled labour in the Off season.\nIt was found, and we must proceed on the basis, rightly found, that the working season of the sugar industry in North Bihar where most of the factories concerned in the present-appeals are situated, completely covers the paddy harvesting season. That however is slender material for any conclusion as regards the existence of opportunities of alternative employment for these unskilled workmen.\nExcept in so far as this conclusion is based on the general probability that newly recruited labour at the commencement of the season is likely to be less efficient and less disciplined than men who have worked in previous seasons, this does not appear to have been based on any concrete evidence on the point.\n Nor is it clear from the materials on the record that unskilled workmen employed in a particular factory consider themselves attached to, that factory.\nIt appears to be clear that once the season is over the unskilled workmen cease to have any contractual relations with the employers and may rejoin on the com- mencement of the season or may not rejoin at their sweet will. As regards the observations of the Tribunal that seasonal employees are entitled to the benefit of provident fund, gratuity and also bonus which shows that in fact their connection with the employers is not broken the materials on the record Are too scanty for arriving at any definite conclusion. In consideration of the nature and extent of the materials on the record we are of opinion that for alleviating the distress of unskilled workmen in these sugar factories, with whom we are concerned in the present appeals a much better course will be to raise the wage structure with an eye to this fact that for a part of the off season at least when they remain unemployed than to pay a retaining allowance for the entire off season\nThe interests of both the employers and labour will, we think, be best served if instead of confirming the order made by the Appellate Tribunal as regards the retaining allowance the workmen will raise this question of raising their wages in view of the seasonal nature of their employment before this Wage Board", + "expert_4": "The appellants-companies, the employers, in these sugar industries also challenge the correctness of the order made by the Industrial Tribunal and confirmed by the Labour Appellate Tribunal awarding the workmen attending the proceedings before the Industrial Tribunal, wages, travelling allowance and halting allowance and further directing that the workmen attending these proceedings would be treated on special leave with pay for the period of such attendance.\nAs regards these orders the appellants contend that they run counter to the pronouncements of this Court in Punjab National Bank Ltd. v. Sri Ram Kanwar, Industrial Tribunal, Delhi (1).\nThis contention, we are bound to say, is correct.\nWhatever might have been said in support of the view taken by the Tribunals in ordering payment of these allowances and of granting special leave to workmen attending proceedings of necessity, if the question was res integra we are bound by the authority of Punjab National Banks Case (1) to (1) 1957 S.C.R. 220. hold that no such allowances are payable and no such order garanting leave may be made.\nThe order of the Tribunals below allowing travelling allowance and balting allowance and special leave to workmen attending proceedings of necessity, must therefore be set aside.\nThat question is whether retaining allowance should be paid to unskilled workers in these industries during the off season.\nDisputes over this question have been going on for many years and committee after committee has wrestled with the problem for arriving at a formula acceptable to both employers and labourers but in vain.\nThe award made by him provided for retaining allowance to skilled and semiskilled workmen but none to unskilled workmen.\nBefore the Appellate Tribunal who heard the appeal against that award the labourers and employers came to an agreement that no retaining allowance would be payable to the unskilled workmen. This award was in operation for a period of two years but was thereafter determined by notice given by workmen followed up by similar notice by employers.\nOn the question of retaining allowance the main contentions on behalf of the employers were that agriculture was the primary occupation of these persons and the employment in the sugar factory was merely a subsidiary occupation, that the claim for retaining allowance was really in the nature of unemployment relief which it was the duty of the State and not the industry to give, that the relationship between the employers and these employees does not exist in off season and so no payment of anything in tile character of wages could possibly be claimed by the labour.\nThe Tribunal overruled all these objections. It was of opinion that the working season in the factory completely covers the paddy harvesting season in North Bihar, where most of the factories are situated so that the workmen the bulk of whom belong to the landless labourers class in the rural areas do not obtain employment in the off season.\nIt also pointed out that the seasonal employees are entitled to provident fund, gratuity and also bonus and that their connection with the employers is not broken during the off season.\nAccordingly it awarded retaining allowance of 5 to all unskilled employees-to be paid every year at the beginning of the season when they report themselves to duty.\nIn agreeing with the Tribunals conclusion the Appellate Tribunal pointed out further that the grant of seasonal allowance to unskilled labour in the industry would promote stability, good relations and efficiency.\nThe real difficulty in coming to a conclusion lies in the fact that while there is no doubt on the one hand of the plight of the seasonal workmen during the off season, if they during such period remain prartically unemployed, there is some force also in the argument that it is neither just nor fair to treat these unfortunate people as the special responsibility of the particular industry or the factory where they are seasonally employed.\nIt is difficult not to agree with the opinion that the relief of unemployment by arranging suitable alternative employment or an alleviation of the distress of such seasonally unemployed persons by providing unemployment insurance benefits or by other modes is primarily the function of the government of the country.\nTo say that, is, however, not to say that the industry where they are seasonally employed should look on unconcerned and play no part in alleviating the distress of the people who have contributed to the prosperity of the industry by their labour, even though for only a part of the year.\nWhile these considerations on either side are common to claims for retaining allowance for all seasonal workmen in all industries, the special facts and circumstances of the categories of workmen and different local circumstances in different industries play an important part in deciding the question.\nIt is obvious as has been noticed by both the Tribunals below, that the employers feel that there is such a glut in the supply of unskilled labour in Bihar that retaining allowance or no retaining allowance a sufficient supply will be available for the industries. That is why the employers contend that they ought not to be asked in an industrial adjudication to pay retaining allowance to unskilled labour.\nIn deciding whether the principles of social justice which it is the aim of industrial adjudication to apply justify the payment of retaining allowance to unskilled workmen in these sugar industries, it is necessary to take into account (a) the opportunities of alternative employment in the off season that will be available to such workmen (b) the degree in which such workmen can be said to have become attached to the particular factory where they work (c) the likely benefit to the industry if such workmen are induced to return to the factory by the incentive of retaining allowance to be paid when the season commences (d) the capacity of the industry to bear the burden of retaining allowance.\nThe capacity of the appellant-employers to bear the additional burden resultant from the 5 retaining allowance ordered by the Tribunals below has not been disputed before us.\nThe position is however far from clear as regards the existence of alternative opportunities available to unskilled labour in the Off season. It was found, and we must proceed on the basis, rightly found, that the working season of the sugar industry in North Bihar where most of the factories concerned in the present-appeals are situated, completely covers the paddy harvesting season.\nThat however is slender material for any conclusion as regards the existence of opportunities of alternative employment for these unskilled workmen. The appellate Tribunal has said that the grant of seasonal allowance to unskilled labour in the industry will promote stability, good relations and efficiency.\nExcept in so far as this conclusion is based on the general probability that newly recruited labour at the commencement of the season is likely to be less efficient and less disciplined than men who have worked in previous seasons, this does not appear to have been based on any concrete evidence on the point.\n Nor is it clear from the materials on the record that unskilled workmen employed in a particular factory consider themselves attached to, that factory.\nIt appears to be clear that once the season is over the unskilled workmen cease to have any contractual relations with the employers and may rejoin on the com- mencement of the season or may not rejoin at their sweet will.\nAs regards the observations of the Tribunal that seasonal employees are entitled to the benefit of provident fund, gratuity and also bonus which shows that in fact their connection with the employers is not broken the materials on the record Are too scanty for arriving at any definite conclusion.\nIn consideration of the nature and extent of the materials on the record we are of opinion that for alleviating the distress of unskilled workmen in these sugar factories, with whom we are concerned in the present appeals a much better course will be to raise the wage structure with an eye to this fact that for a part of the off season at least when they remain unemployed than to pay a retaining allowance for the entire off season.\nThe appellants counsel readily agrees that the fact that these unskilled workmen find employment in the sugar factories only for a few months and are in comparative difficulty in the matter of finding employment during the remaining months, should be taken into consideration in fixing their wages. We are informed that a Wage Board entrusted with the task of fixing the wages of the workmen concerned in these disputes is sitting at the present time.\nThe interests of both the employers and labour will, we think, be best served if instead of confirming the order made by the Appellate Tribunal as regards the retaining allowance the workmen will raise this question of raising their wages in view of the seasonal nature of their employment before this Wage Board.", + "expert_5": "agriculture was the primary occupation of these persons and the employment in the sugar factory was merely a subsidiary occupation, that the claim for retaining allowance was really in the nature of unemployment relief which it was the duty of the State and not the industry to give, that the relationship between the employers and these employees does not exist in off season and so no payment of anything in tile character of wages could possibly be claimed by the labour.\nwhile there is no doubt on the one hand of the plight of the seasonal workmen during the off season, if they during such period remain prartically unemployed\nthere is some force also in the argument that it is neither just nor fair to treat these unfortunate people as the special responsibility of the particular industry or the factory where they are seasonally employed.\nIt is difficult not to agree with the opinion that the relief of unemployment by arranging suitable alternative employment or an alleviation of the distress of such seasonally unemployed persons by providing unemployment insurance benefits or by other modes is primarily the function of the government of the country.\nTo say that, is, however, not to say that the industry where they are seasonally employed should look on unconcerned and play no part in alleviating the distress of the people who have contributed to the prosperity of the industry by their labour, even though for only a part of the year.\nWhile these considerations on either side are common to claims for retaining allowance for all seasonal workmen in all industries, the special facts and circumstances of the categories of workmen and different local circumstances in different industries play an important part in deciding the question.\nthe employers feel that there is such a glut in the supply of unskilled labour in Bihar that retaining allowance or no retaining allowance a sufficient supply will be available for the industries. That is why the employers contend that they ought not to be asked in an industrial adjudication to pay retaining allowance to unskilled labour.\nWe do no think it will be fair to say that merely because the employers have agreed to pay retaining allowance to skilled labour their opposition to such payment of some such allowance to unskilled labour is unjustified.\nIn deciding whether the principles of social justice which it is the aim of industrial adjudication to apply justify the payment of retaining allowance to unskilled workmen in these sugar industries, it is necessary to take into account (a) the opportunities of alternative employment in the off season that will be available to such workmen (b) the degree in which such workmen can be said to have become attached to the particular factory where they work (c) the likely benefit to the industry if such workmen are induced to return to the factory by the incentive of retaining allowance to be paid when the season commences (d) the capacity of the industry to bear the burden of retaining allowance.\nthe opportunities of alternative employment in the off season that will be available to such workmen\nIt was found, and we must proceed on the basis, rightly found, that the working season of the sugar industry in North Bihar where most of the factories concerned in the present-appeals are situated, completely covers the paddy harvesting season.\nExcept in so far as this conclusion is based on the general probability that newly recruited labour at the commencement of the season is likely to be less efficient and less disciplined than men who have worked in previous seasons, this does not appear to have been based on any concrete evidence on the point.\nNor is it clear from the materials on the record that unskilled workmen employed in a particular factory consider themselves attached to, that factory.\nIt appears to be clear that once the season is over the unskilled workmen cease to have any contractual relations with the employers and may rejoin on the com- mencement of the season or may not rejoin at their sweet will.\nAs regards the observations of the Tribunal that seasonal employees are entitled to the benefit of provident fund, gratuity and also bonus which shows that in fact their connection with the employers is not broken the materials on the record Are too scanty for arriving at any definite conclusion.\nIn consideration of the nature and extent of the materials on the record we are of opinion that for alleviating the distress of unskilled workmen in these sugar factories, with whom we are concerned in the present appeals a much better course will be to raise the wage structure with an eye to this fact that for a part of the off season at least when they remain unemployed than to pay a retaining allowance for the entire off season." + }, + "1960_100": { + "expert_1": "Three issues, all of a general nature, were framed by the trial court, namely-- Whether the plaintiffs dismissal is void, illegal, inoperative and wrongful and what is its effect ? Whether the Civil Courts have jurisdiction to entertain the suit or to go into the question of the validity of the departmental enquiry ? Whether the suit for a declaration lies and is competent and why ? It is unfortunate that the specific points raised by the appellant whatever they were were not made the subject- matter of specific issues. However, the trial court came to the conclusion that the case of the appellant was governed by s. 240(3) of the Government India Act, 1935 and it was reinforced in this conclusion by the Police Regulations which, according to it, provided for the same safeguards as were contained in s. 240(3). It therefore held that as s. 240(3) had not been complied with, the dismissal was void and illegal As to the other two issues relating to the jurisdiction of civil courts they were decided in favour of the appellant.\n There was an appeal to the District Judge by the Punjab Government. The District Judge agreed with the conclusions of the trial court on the applicability of s. 240(3) to the case of the appellant and further referred to an amendment in the Police Regulations which required that before an order of dismissal or reduction in rank is made, the officer to be punished shall be produced before the officer empowered to punish him and shall be informed of the charges proved against him and called upon to show cause why an order of dismissal or reduction in rank should not be passed. The District Judge was conscious that this amendment in the Regulations was made in September 1946 long after the dismissal of the appellant and therefore would not apply to the appellants case but he overruled this contention on the ground that the rule was merely declaratory of the law and only removed the ambiguity that might have arisen because of s. 243 of the Government of India Act. He therefore dismissed the appeal.\n Then followed a second appeal by the Punjab Government to the High Court. The High Court held that s. 240(3) did Dot apply to the case of the appellant and that s. 243 was the governing section. In consequence the High Court further held that the appellant was not entitled to the protection of s. 240(3) and as the amendment to the Police Regulations which brought in the substance of s. 240(3) therein was made after the dismissal of the appellant, he could not take advantage of it. As to the enquiry, the High Court held that though there might have been minor procedural defects in the enquiry it was on the whole substantially in accordance with the Regulations and principles of natural justice and could not therefore be held to be invalid. The High Court pointed out that there was no serious contraven- tion of the Regulations and the witnesses who had appeared were cross-examined by the appellant who was also called upon to produce his defence within 48 hours. He however did not choose to do so and wanted a postponement which was refused and thereafter the Superintendent of Police proceeded to dismiss him. Learned counsel for the appellant challenges the cor- erectness of the view taken by the High Court and three points have been urged on his behalf before us, namely, (1) s. 240(3) of the Government of India Act applied to police officers of subordinate rank and there was nothing in s. 243 which took away from such officers the protection of s. 240(3) (2) Even if the Police Regulations alone applied, there was such violation of the relevant regulations as to vitiate the enquiry proceedings and (3) The Superintendent of Police could not hold a departmental enquiry as a criminal offence had been committed, and reliance in this connection was placed on ss. 29 and 35 of the Police Act, No. V of 1861. Re. (1).\nObviously s. 243 was a special provision with regard to subordinate ranks of police forces in India and it is not in dispute that the appellant belonged to the subordinate ranks. Therefore according to s. 243, the conditions of service of the subordinate ranks are governed by or under the Acts relating to police forces and s. 240(3) can have no application to them. The non obstante clause of s. 243 makes it clear that so far as the subordinate ranks of police forces in India are concerned, a. 243 will apply and not the earlier provisions including s. 240(3).\nWe are therefore of opinion that in view of the special provisions in s. 243 relating to the subordinate ranks of police forces in India (to which the appellant undoubtedly belonged), s. 240(3) would have no application.\nWe may in this connection refer to the judgment of the Privy Council in North- West Frontier Province v. Suraj Narain Anand (1), where it was held that the non obstante clause in s. 243 excluded the operation of s. 240(2) in the case of subordinate ranks of police forces in India and that conditions of service included the right of dismissal. (1) 1948 F.C.R. 103. That case dealt with s. 240(2) but the same reasoning would in our opinion apply to s. 240(3). As has already been pointed out by the learned District Judge, the substance of s. 240(3) was brought into the Police Regulations in September 1946 long after the appellant had been dismissed and would therefore not apply to the appellant. He would therefore not be entitled to the second notice under s. 240(3) as explained in I. M. Lalls case by the Privy Council (See High Commissioner for India High Commissioner for Pakistan v. I. M. Lall (1)). Nor was such notice necessary under the Police Regulations as they existed at the time of the appellants dismissal.", + "expert_2": "appellant was appointed as a foot- constable in 1931 in the Punjab Police and was dismissed on January 25, 1944. Shortly before, he was acting as an Assistant Sub-Inspector and actually working as a Police Censor. The charge against him was that while he was working as Police Censor, he detained certain letters illegally and had copies and photo- graphs made of them and later used these copies and photographs for blackmail. He was consequently reverted to his substantive post of head constable on January 14, 1944. Thereafter on January 21, 1944, an enquiry was started against him by the Superintendent of Police and he was eventually dismissed.\nthe only specific grievance made out by the appellant in the plaint was that the Superintendent of Police had dismissed him without recording his defence evidence and without giving him an opportunity to produce the same. The appellant amended the plaint later and added one more grievance, namely, that he had been appointed by the Deputy Inspector General of Police and could only have been dismissed by him and not by the Superintendent of Police.\nIn consequence the High Court further held that the appellant was not entitled to the protection of s. 240(3) and as the amendment to the Police Regulations which brought in the substance of s. 240(3) therein was made after the dismissal of the appellant, he could not take advantage of it. As to the enquiry, the High Court held that though there might have been minor procedural defects in the enquiry it was on the whole substantially in accordance with the Regulations and principles of natural justice and could not therefore be held to be invalid.\nObviously s. 243 was a special provision with regard to subordinate ranks of police forces in India and it is not in dispute that the appellant belonged to the subordinate ranks. Therefore according to s. 243, the conditions of service of the subordinate ranks are governed by or under the Acts relating to police forces and s. 240(3) can have no application to them. The non obstante clause of s. 243 makes it clear that so far as the subordinate ranks of police forces in India are concerned, a. 243 will apply and not the earlier provisions including s. 240(3). We are therefore of opinion that in view of the special provisions in s. 243 relating to the subordinate ranks of police forces in India (to which the appellant undoubtedly belonged), s. 240(3) would have no application.\nNorth- West Frontier Province v. Suraj Narain Anand (1), where it was held that the non obstante clause in s. 243 excluded the operation of s. 240(2) in the case of subordinate ranks of police forces in India and that conditions of service included the right of dismissal. (1) 1948 F.C.R. 103. That case dealt with s. 240(2) but the same reasoning would in our opinion apply to s. 240(3). As has already been pointed out by the learned District Judge, the substance of s. 240(3) was brought into the Police Regulations in September 1946 long after the appellant had been dismissed and would therefore not apply to the appellant", + "expert_3": "The brief facts necessary for present purposes are that the appellant was appointed as a foot- constable in 1931 in the Punjab Police and was dismissed on January 25, 1944. Shortly before, he was acting as an Assistant Sub-Inspector and actually working as a Police Censor.\nThe charge against him was that while he was working as Police Censor, he detained certain letters illegally and had copies and photo- graphs made of them and later used these copies and photographs for blackmail.\nThereafter on January 21, 1944, an enquiry was started against him by the Superintendent of Police and he was eventually dismissed. He went in appeal to the Deputy Inspector General of Police, which was dismissed. He then went in revision to the Inspector General of Police, which also failed.\n Finally he made several representations and memorials to the Punjab Government but without avail. Consequently the present suit was filed by the appellant in February 1949.\nThe plaint as originally filed, after narrating the facts relating to the appellants service, merely stated that the charge of misconduct was brought against the appellant on account of enmity and that the departmental enquiry made by the Superintendent of Police was arbitrary and not according to law, rules and regulations prescribed for the same. Besides this vague general allegation, the only specific grievance made out by the appellant in the plaint was that the Superintendent of Police had dismissed him without recording his defence evidence and without giving him an opportunity to produce the same. The appellant amended the plaint later and added one more grievance, namely, that he had been appointed by the Deputy Inspector General of Police and could only have been dismissed by him and not by the Superintendent of Police.\n As to the Departmental enquiry, certain further defects therein were pointed out besides the allegation already made that his defence had not been taken and that he had not been given an opportunity to produce it. Those further defects were (i) that he was not permitted to engage counsel, (ii) that he was not allowed full opportunity to crossexamine the prosecution witnesses, and \n that he was not asked by the enquiry officer to state what he had to say in answer to the charge against him and was not permitted to file a written-statement explaining the alleged incriminating circumstances against him.\nThree issues, all of a general nature, were framed by the trial court, namely-- Whether the plaintiffs dismissal is void, illegal, inoperative and wrongful and what is its effect ? Whether the Civil Courts have jurisdiction to entertain the suit or to go into the question of the validity of the departmental enquiry ?\nWhether the suit for a declaration lies and is competent and why ?\nthe trial court came to the conclusion that the case of the appellant was governed by s. 240(3) of the Government India Act, 1935 and it was reinforced in this conclusion by the Police Regulations which, according to it, provided for the same safeguards as were contained in s. 240(3). It therefore held that as s. 240(3) had not been complied with, the dismissal was void and illegal As to the other two issues relating to the jurisdiction of civil courts they were decided in favour of the appellant.\nThere was an appeal to the District Judge by the Punjab Government.\nThe District Judge agreed with the conclusions of the trial court on the applicability of s. 240(3) to the case of the appellant and further referred to an amendment in the Police Regulations which required that before an order of dismissal or reduction in rank is made, the officer to be punished shall be produced before the officer empowered to punish him and shall be informed of the charges proved against him and called upon to show cause why an order of dismissal or reduction in rank should not be passed. The District Judge was conscious that this amendment in the Regulations was made in September 1946 long after the dismissal of the appellant and therefore would not apply to the appellants case but he overruled this contention on the ground that the rule was merely declaratory of the law and only removed the ambiguity that might have arisen because of s. 243 of the Government of India Act. He therefore dismissed the appeal\nThen followed a second appeal by the Punjab Government to the High Court.\nThe High Court held that s. 240(3) did Dot apply to the case of the appellant and that s. 243 was the governing section. In consequence the High Court further held that the appellant was not entitled to the protection of s. 240(3) and as the amendment to the Police Regulations which brought in the substance of s. 240(3) therein was made after the dismissal of the appellant, he could not take advantage of it. As to the enquiry, the High Court held that though there might have been minor procedural defects in the enquiry it was on the whole substantially in accordance with the Regulations and principles of natural justice and could not therefore be held to be invalid. The High Court pointed out that there was no serious contraven- tion of the Regulations and the witnesses who had appeared were cross-examined by the appellant who was also called upon to produce his defence within 48 hours\nHe however did not choose to do so and wanted a postponement which was refused and thereafter the Superintendent of Police proceeded to dismiss him\nSection 243 of the Government of India Act appears in Chapter 11 of Part X dealing with Civil Services.\n That Chapter begins with s. 240 and sub-s. (3) thereof provides that no member of a civil service or holding any civil post in India shall be dismissed or reduced in rank until he has been given a reasonable opportunity of showing cause against the action proposed to be taken in regard to him.\nSection 243 however is in these terms- Notwithstanding anything in the foregoing provisions of this chapter, the conditions of service of the subordinate ranks of the various police forces in India shall be such as may be determined by or under the Act relating to those forces respectively\nObviously s. 243 was a special provision with regard to subordinate ranks of police forces in India and it is not in dispute that the appellant belonged to the subordinate ranks. Therefore according to s. 243, the conditions of service of the subordinate ranks are governed by or under the Acts relating to police forces and s. 240(3) can have no application to them. The non obstante clause of s. 243 makes it clear that so far as the subordinate ranks of police forces in India are concerned, a. 243 will apply and not the earlier provisions including s. 240(3\nWe are therefore of opinion that in view of the special provisions in s. 243 relating to the subordinate ranks of police forces in India (to which the appellant undoubtedly belonged), s. 240(3) would have no application\nWe may in this connection refer to the judgment of the Privy Council in North- West Frontier Province v. Suraj Narain Anand (1), where it was held that the non obstante clause in s. 243 excluded the operation of s. 240(2) in the case of subordinate ranks of police forces in India and that conditions of service included the right of dismissal\nAs has already been pointed out by the learned District Judge, the substance of s. 240(3) was brought into the Police Regulations in September 1946 long after the appellant had been dismissed and would therefore not apply to the appellant. He would therefore not be entitled to the second notice under s. 240(3) as explained in I.\nNor was such notice necessary under the Police Regulations as they existed at the time of the appellants dismissal", + "expert_4": "The brief facts necessary for present purposes are that the appellant was appointed as a foot- constable in 1931 in the Punjab Police and was dismissed on January 25, 1944.\nThe charge against him was that while he was working as Police Censor, he detained certain letters illegally and had copies\nand photo- graphs made of them and later used these copies and photographs for blackmail.\nhe was eventually dismissed.\nHe went in appeal to the Deputy Inspector General of Police, which was dismissed.\nHe then went in revision to the Inspector General of Police, which also failed.\nThe plaint as originally filed, after narrating the facts relating to the appellants service, merely stated that the charge of misconduct was brought against the appellant on account of enmity and that the departmental enquiry made by the Superintendent of Police was arbitrary and not according to law, rules and regulations prescribed for the same.\nBesides this vague general allegation, the only specific grievance made out by the appellant in the plaint was that the Superintendent of Police had dismissed him without recording his defence evidence and without giving him an opportunity to produce the same.\nThe appellant amended the plaint later and added one more grievance, namely, that he had been appointed by the Deputy Inspector General of Police and could only have been dismissed by him and not by the Superintendent of Police.\nAs to the Departmental enquiry, certain further defects therein were pointed out besides the allegation already made that his defence had not been taken and that he had not been given an opportunity to produce it.\nThose further defects were (i) that he was not permitted to engage counsel, (ii) that he was not allowed full opportunity to crossexamine the prosecution witnesses, and \n that he was not asked by the enquiry officer to state what he had to say in answer to the charge against him and was not permitted to file a written-statement explaining the alleged incriminating circumstances against him.\nThe suit was opposed on behalf of the Punjab Government and among others their main defence was that the enquiry was in accordance with the Regulations and was not arbitrary.\nIt was also denied that no opportunity had been given to the appellant to lead defence evidence or to cross-examine prosecution witnesses or to make his own statement in answer to the charge. It was admitted that permission was refused to engage a counsel but it was finally averred that taking the enquiry as a whole there was no such defect in its conduct as to invalidate it or call for interference by the courts.\nThree issues, all of a general nature, were framed by the trial court, namely-- Whether the plaintiffs dismissal is void, illegal, inoperative and wrongful and what is its effect ? Whether the Civil Courts have jurisdiction to entertain the suit or to go into the question of the validity of the departmental enquiry ?\nWhether the suit for a declaration lies and is competent and why ?\nthe trial court came to the conclusion that the case of the appellant was governed by s. 240(3) of the Government India Act, 1935 and it was reinforced in this conclusion by the Police Regulations which, according to it, provided for the same safeguards as were contained in s. 240(3). It therefore held that as s. 240(3) had not been complied with, the dismissal was void and illegal As to the other two issues relating to the jurisdiction of civil courts they were decided in favour of the appellant.\nThe District Judge agreed with the conclusions of the trial court on the applicability of s. 240(3) to the case of the appellant and further referred to an amendment in the Police Regulations which required that before an order of dismissal or reduction in rank is made, the officer to be punished shall be produced before the officer empowered to punish him and shall be informed of the charges proved against him and called upon to show cause why an order of dismissal or reduction in rank should not be passed.\nThe District Judge was conscious that this amendment in the Regulations was made in September 1946 long after the dismissal of the appellant and therefore would not apply to the appellants case but he overruled this contention on the ground that the rule was merely declaratory of the law and only removed the ambiguity that might have arisen because of s. 243 of the Government of India Act. He therefore dismissed the appeal.\nThe High Court held that s. 240(3) did Dot apply to the case of the appellant and that s. 243 was the governing section.\nIn consequence the High Court further held that the appellant was not entitled to the protection of s. 240(3) and as the amendment to the Police Regulations which brought in the substance of s. 240(3) therein was made after the dismissal of the appellant, he could not take advantage of it.\nAs to the enquiry, the High Court held that though there might have been minor procedural defects in the enquiry it was on the whole substantially in accordance with the Regulations and principles of natural justice and could not therefore be held to be invalid.\nThe High Court pointed out that there was no serious contraven- tion of the Regulations and the witnesses who had appeared were cross-examined by the appellant who was also called upon to produce his defence within 48 hours.\nHe however did not choose to do so and wanted a postponement which was refused and thereafter the Superintendent of Police proceeded to dismiss him.\nLearned counsel for the appellant challenges the cor- erectness of the view taken by the High Court and three points have been urged on his behalf before us, namely, (1) s. 240(3) of the Government of India Act applied to police officers of subordinate rank and there was nothing in s. 243 which took away from such officers the protection of s. 240(3) (2) Even if the Police Regulations alone applied, there was such violation of the relevant regulations as to vitiate the enquiry proceedings and (3) The Superintendent of Police could not hold a departmental enquiry as a criminal offence had been committed, and reliance in this connection was placed on ss. 29 and 35 of the Police Act, No. V of 1861. Re. (1).\ns. 240 and sub-s. (3) thereof provides that no member of a civil service or holding any civil post in India shall be dismissed or reduced in rank until he has been given a reasonable opportunity of showing cause against the action proposed to be taken in regard to him.\nSection 243 however is in these terms- Notwithstanding anything in the foregoing provisions of this chapter, the conditions of service of the subordinate ranks of the various police forces in India shall be such as may be determined by or under the Act relating to those forces respectively.\nObviously s. 243 was a special provision with regard to subordinate ranks of police forces in India and it is not in dispute that the appellant belonged to the subordinate ranks.\nTherefore according to s. 243, the conditions of service of the subordinate ranks are governed by or under the Acts relating to police forces and s. 240(3) can have no application to them.\nThe non obstante clause of s. 243 makes it clear that so far as the subordinate ranks of police forces in India are concerned, a. 243 will apply and not the earlier provisions including s. 240(3).\nWe are therefore of opinion that in view of the special provisions in s. 243 relating to the subordinate ranks of police forces in India (to which the appellant undoubtedly belonged), s. 240(3) would have no application.\nWe may in this connection refer to the judgment of the Privy Council in North- West Frontier Province v. Suraj Narain Anand (1), where it was held that the non obstante clause in s. 243 excluded the operation of s. 240(2) in the case of subordinate ranks of police forces in India and that conditions of service included the right of dismissal. (1) 1948 F.C.R. 103.\nAs has already been pointed out by the learned District Judge, the substance of s. 240(3) was brought into the Police Regulations in September 1946 long after the appellant had been dismissed and would therefore not apply to the appellant. He would therefore not be entitled to the second notice under s. 240(3) as explained in I. M. Lalls case by the Privy Council (See High Commissioner for India High Commissioner for Pakistan v. I. M.\nLall (1)).\nNor was such notice necessary under the Police Regulations as they existed at the time of the appellants dismissal.", + "expert_5": "The charge against him was that while he was working as Police Censor, he detained certain letters illegally and had copies and photo- graphs made of them and later used these copies and photographs for blackmail.\nthe departmental enquiry made by the Superintendent of Police was arbitrary and not according to law, rules and regulations prescribed for the same.\nvague general allegation\nSuperintendent of Police had dismissed him without recording his defence evidence and without giving him an opportunity to produce the same\nThose further defects were (i) that he was not permitted to engage counsel, (ii) that he was not allowed full opportunity to crossexamine the prosecution witnesses, and \n that he was not asked by the enquiry officer to state what he had to say in answer to the charge against him and was not permitted to file a written-statement explaining the alleged incriminating circumstances against him.\nIt was admitted that permission was refused to engage a counsel but it was finally averred that taking the enquiry as a whole there was no such defect in its conduct as to invalidate it or call for interference by the courts.\nno member of a civil service or holding any civil post in India shall be dismissed or reduced in rank until he has been given a reasonable opportunity of showing cause against the action proposed to be taken in regard to him.\nNotwithstanding anything in the foregoing provisions of this chapter\nNotwithstanding anything in the foregoing provisions of this chapter, the conditions of service of the subordinate ranks of the various police forces in India shall be such as may be determined by or under the Act relating to those forces respectively.\nit is not in dispute that the appellant belonged to the subordinate ranks.\nTherefore according to s. 243, the conditions of service of the subordinate ranks are governed by or under the Acts relating to police forces and s. 240(3) can have no application to them.\nThe non obstante clause of s. 243 makes it clear that so far as the subordinate ranks of police forces in India are concerned, a. 243 will apply and not the earlier provisions including s. 240(3).\nWe may in this connection refer to the judgment of the Privy Council in North- West Frontier Province v. Suraj Narain Anand (1), where it was held that the non obstante clause in s. 243 excluded the operation of s. 240(2) in the case of subordinate ranks of police forces in India and that conditions of service included the right of dismissal. (1) 1948 F.C.R. 103. That case dealt with s. 240(2) but the same reasoning would in our opinion apply to s. 240(3).\nAs has already been pointed out by the learned District Judge, the substance of s. 240(3) was brought into the Police Regulations in September 1946 long after the appellant had been dismissed and would therefore not apply to the appellant." + }, + "1960_103": { + "expert_1": "Against the judgment and order of the High Court of Madras allowing a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. The question there raised was the legality of the assessment of Sales Tax by appellant No. 2, the Deputy Commercial Sales Tax Officer, Saidapet, under the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939 (Act IX of 1939), hereinafter termed the Act. The respondent was a partnership firm carrying on tannery business at Chromepet near the city of Madras. Before the year of assessment, i. e., 1952-53, it was taking out licences under the relevant provisions of the Act but it did not renew the licence for the assessment year. When called upon to make a return it did not do so nor did it raise any objection to the notice served on it on February 28, 1954. It was assessed to sales tax of Rs. 10,584 on a turnover of Rs. 6,77,374-4-4. It filed a petition under Art. 226 to quash the assessment order on the ground that the order was illegal and not supported by the authority of law. This contention was accepted by the High Court and the petition was allowed with costs. The consequence of the judgment is that the respondent firm which is not a licensed dealer under the Act is not liable to any sales tax in respect of its dealings in hides and skins.\n Against this judgment and order the appellants have come to this court by special leave.\nIn order to decide this appeal it is necessary to refer to and consider the relevant provisions of the Act and the two sets of Rules made thereunder.\nS. 3(1) Subject to the provisions of this Act,- (a) every dealer shall pay for each year a tax on his total turnover for such year and A dealer whose total turnover in any year is less than ten thousand rupees shall not be liable to pay any tax for that year under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2). For the purposes of this section and the other provisions of this Act, turnover shall be determined in accordance with such rules as may be prescribed \n The taxes under sub-sections (1) and (2) shall be assessed, levied and collected in such manner and in such instalments, if any, as may be prescribed S. 5. Subject to such restrictions and conditions as may be prescribed, including conditions as to licences and licence fees. the sale of hides and skins, whether tanned or untanned shall be liable to tax under section 3, subsection (1), only at such single point in the series of sales by successive dealers as may be prescribed. S. 6A. If any restrictions or conditions prescribed under section 5 or notified under section 6 are contravened or are not observed by a dealer, or in case a condition so prescribed or notified requires that a licence shall be taken out or renewed, if a licence is not taken out or renewed, by the dealer or if any of the conditions of a licence taken out or renewed by him are contravened or are not observed, the sales of the dealer, with effect from the commencement of the year in which such contravention or non- observance took place, may be assessed to tax or taxes under section 3, as if the provisions of section 5 or of the notification under section 6, as the case may be, did not apply to such sales and notwithstanding that a licence, if any, taken out or renewed by the dealer continued or continues to be in force during the year . MADRAS GENERAL SALES TAX (TURNOVER AND ASSESSMENT) RULES. Rule 4(1). Save as provided in sub-rule (2) the gross turnover of a dealer for the purposes of these rules shall be the amount for which goods are sold by the dealer. In the case of the undermentioned goods turnover of a dealer for the purposes of these rules shall be the amount for which the goods are bought by the dealer. (c) untanned hides and skins bought by a licensed tanner in the State, and (d) untanned hides and skins exported outside the State by a licensed dealer in hides or skins. Rule 15(1). Rules 6 to 13 shall not apply to licensed tanners and other licensed dealers in hides or skins in respect of their dealings in hides or skins but the provisions of this and the following rule shall apply to them in respect of such dealings. Rule 16(1). In the case of hides and skins, the tax payable under section 3(1) shall be levied in accordance with the provisions of this rule. No tax shall be levied on the sale of untanned hides or skins by a licensed dealer in hides or skins except at the stage at which such hides or skins are sold to a tanner in the State or are sold for export outside the State in the case of all untanned hides or skins sold to a tanner in the State, the tax shall be levied from the tanner on the amount for which the hides or skins are bought by him. \n In the case of all untanned hides or skins which are not sold to a tanner in the State but are exported outside the State, the tax shall be levied from the dealer who was the last dealer not exempt from taxation under section 3(3), who buys them in the State on the amount for which they were bought by him. Sale of hides or skins by dealers other than licensed dealers in hides or skins shall,subject to the provisions of section 3, be liable to taxation on each occasion of sale. Rule 5(1) of the ax Rules provides - Every person who (d) deals in hides and or skins whether as a tanner, or otherwise, or shall, if he desires to avail himself of the exemption provided in sections 5 and 8 or of the concession of single point taxation provided in section 6, submit an application in Form 1 for a licence in respect of each of his places of business to the authority specified in sub- rule (2) so as to reach him not later than the 15th day of October, 1939 . The scheme of taxation under the Act is this. Section 3 is the general charging section under which tax is levied in the manner prescribed in the turnover of a dealer, except that a dealer whose turnover is less than Rs. 10,000/- is exempted from sales tax.\n Section 3 envisages multipoint taxation on the total turnover of a dealer. In the case of the sale transactions of certain specified goods set out in s. 5 of the Act an exception is made. That section provides for single point taxation subject to certain prescribed restrictions and conditions. By sub-s. (vi) of that section sales of hides and skins are liable to tax under s.3, sub-s. (1), at one single point in the series of sales by successive dealers.\nThe language of the section (s.5) shows however that this exemption applies subject to certain restrictions and conditions which include conditions as to licences. The rule, which deals with licences is r. 5 of the Sales Tax Rules, the relevant portion of which has already been set out It lays down that if a dealer desires to avail himself of the exemption provided in ss. 5 and 8 or of the concession as to taxation in s. 5 only at a single point, then he must obtain a licence as prescribed in that rule. If the restrictions and conditions contemplated by s. 5 read with the rules are not complied with, certain consequences follow as a result of s. 6-A of the Act which specifically states that where a condition prescribed or notified requires the taking out or the renewal of a licence, then in the case of contravention of such conditions or restrictions the tax is to be levied under s. 3 as if the provisions of s. 5 did not apply to such sales.\nThis, therefore, is a clear provision which makes the single point imposition of sales tax on hides and skins to be conditional on observing the condition of taking a licence. The argument of inconsistency between r. 16(5) of the Turnover and Assessment Rules and s. 5(vi) of the Act which was accepted in the High Court receives no support from the language of that section which is a concessional provision for making the sales of hides and skins liable to taxation at a single point but that, as the opening words of the section show, is subject to restrictions and conditions prescribed in the rules and one of these conditions is the taking of a licence. All that r. 16(5) does is to emphasise the consequences of non- observance of the conditions which ss. 5(vi) 6-A have in clear terms prescribed.\nWe find no inconsistency between the rule and the sections of the Act.\nBut it was submitted that this Court on appeal from a judgment of the Madras High Court had sId r. 16(5) to be ultra vires the Act. That contention is based on the judgment of the Madras High Court in V. M. Syed Mohammed Company v. The State of Madras (1) which on appeal was affirmed by this Court (2).\nThis contention is not well-founded.", + "expert_2": "Before the year of assessment, i. e., 1952-53, it was taking out licences under the relevant provisions of the Act but it did not renew the licence for the assessment year. When called upon to make a return it did not do so nor did it raise any objection to the notice served on it on February 28, 1954. It was assessed to sales tax of Rs. 10,584 on a turnover of Rs. 6,77,374-4-4. It filed a petition under Art. 226 to quash the assessment order on the ground that the order was illegal and not supported by the authority of law. This contention was accepted by the High Court and the petition was allowed with costs. The consequence of the judgment is that the respondent firm which is not a licensed dealer under the Act is not liable to any sales tax in respect of its dealings in hides and skins.\nIt was also contended that in the taxation scheme under the Act, hides and skins, because of their importance in the international market, were excluded from the direct operation of s. 3(1) of the Act which was the general charging section and were given special protection of the single point taxation under s. 5(vi). The (1) 1954 S.C.R. 1117. argument, therefore, was that in the case of sales of hides and skins the general provision was inapplicable and a special rule for taxation was laid down by s. 5(vi) of the Act.\nSection 3 is the general charging section under which tax is levied in the manner prescribed in the turnover of a dealer, except that a dealer whose turnover is less than Rs. 10,000/- is exempted from sales tax.\n Section 3 envisages multipoint taxation on the total turnover of a dealer. In the case of the sale transactions of certain specified goods set out in s. 5 of the Act an exception is made. That section provides for single point taxation subject to certain prescribed restrictions and conditions. By sub-s. (vi) of that section sales of hides and skins are liable to tax under s.3, sub-s. (1), at one single point in the series of sales by successive dealers. The language of the section (s.5) shows however that this exemption applies subject to certain restrictions and conditions which include conditions as to licences. The rule, which deals with licences is r. 5 of the Sales Tax Rules, the relevant portion of which has already been set out It lays down that if a dealer desires to avail himself of the exemption provided in ss. 5 and 8 or of the concession as to taxation in s. 5 only at a single point, then he must obtain a licence as prescribed in that rule.\ns. 6-A of the Act which specifically states that where a condition prescribed or notified requires the taking out or the renewal of a licence, then in the case of contravention of such conditions or restrictions the tax is to be levied under s. 3 as if the provisions of s. 5 did not apply to such sales.\nAll that r. 16(5) does is to emphasise the consequences of non- observance of the conditions which ss. 5(vi) 6-A have in clear terms prescribed. We find no inconsistency between the rule and the sections of the Act.\nIn that case, when it was in the Madras High Court, it was contended that the rules did not properly carry out the policy underlying the Act, which was to keep the price of hides and skins at a competitive level for the world market. It was there argued that hides and skins were articles much in demand in the foreign markets and their export was one of the main items of the foreign trade of the State of Madras which enjoyed considerable natural advantage in tanning because of the plentiful supply of Avaram bark which was specially suited for the purpose. It was also argued that untanned hides and skins were acquired locally or by import from other States and were either tanned in the State or exported and therefore the scheme of taxation was to levy the tax at a single point, i.e., at the stage when articles were tanned in the State or exported to foreign countries for tanning. For this reason multiple taxation was violative of s. 5(vi) of the Act. This, it appears, was not disputed by the Government and it was therefore held that r. 16(5) of the Turnover and Assessment Rules was ultra vires.\nThis sub-rule has been held to be ultra vires by the High Court, and indeed, the learned Advocate General of Madras did not in the High Court, as before us, dispute that rule 16(5) was repugnant to ,section 5(vi). That sub-rule, however affects only unlicensed dealers and the appellants who are admittedly licensed dealers are not affected by that sub-rule .", + "expert_3": "Against the judgment and order of the High Court of Madras allowing a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. The question there raised was the legality of the assessment of Sales Tax by appellant No. 2, the Deputy Commercial Sales Tax Officer, Saidapet, under the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939 (Act IX of 1939), hereinafter termed the Act.\nThe respondent was a partnership firm carrying on tannery business at Chromepet near the city of Madras. Before the year of assessment, i. e., 1952-53, it was taking out licences under the relevant provisions of the Act but it did not renew the licence for the assessment year. When called upon to make a return it did not do so nor did it raise any objection to the notice served on it on February 28, 1954\nIt was assessed to sales tax of Rs. 10,584 on a turnover of Rs. 6,77,374-4-4. It filed a petition under Art. 226 to quash the assessment order on the ground that the order was illegal and not supported by the authority of law. This contention was accepted by the High Court and the petition was allowed with costs. The consequence of the judgment is that the respondent firm which is not a licensed dealer under the Act is not liable to any sales tax in respect of its dealings in hides and skins\nAgainst this judgment and order the appellants have come to this court by special leave\nThe High Court held that in the case of hides and it skins the charge levied by s. 3 is subject to the pro. visions of S. 5 and in the case of licensed dealers in hides and skins, the charging provision is r. 16 of the Turnover and Assessment Rules . The High Court further held that r. 16(5) of the Turnover and Assessment Rules which restricted the benefit of single point taxation to licensed dealers was ultra vires as it contravened s. 5(vi) of the Act and s. 6-A was not applicable to the case of a dealer who did not take out a licence for dealing in hides and skins and further that if r. 16(5) was ultra vires as being in contravention of s. 5(vi), r. 5, of the Madras General Sales Tax Rules (hereinafter called the Sales Tax Rules) which requires the taking out of the licence in order to be able to get the benefit of single point taxation would also be ultra vires\nThus on a true construction of s. 3(1) and s. 5(vi) it was of the opinion that r. 5 of the Sales Tax Rules and r. 16(5) of the Turnover and Assessment Rules were ultra vires and s. 6A was inapplicable to a person who had not taken out a licence. As a consequence it quashed the order of assessment of the respondent firm.\nIn order to decide this appeal it is necessary to refer to and consider the relevant provisions of the Act and the two sets of Rules made thereunder\nThey are as follows- S. 3(1) Subject to the provisions of this Act,- (a) every dealer shall pay for each year a tax on his total turnover for such year and A dealer whose total turnover in any year is less than ten thousand rupees shall not be liable to pay any tax for that year under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2). For the purposes of this section and the other provisions of this Act, turnover shall be determined in accordance with such rules as may be prescribed \n The taxes under sub-sections (1) and (2) shall be assessed, levied and collected in such manner and in such instalments, if any, as may be prescribed S. 5\nSubject to such restrictions and conditions as may be prescribed, including conditions as to licences and licence fees. the sale of hides and skins, whether tanned or untanned shall be liable to tax under section 3, subsection (1), only at such single point in the series of sales by successive dealers as may be prescribed\nIf any restrictions or conditions prescribed under section 5 or notified under section 6 are contravened or are not observed by a dealer, or in case a condition so prescribed or notified requires that a licence shall be taken out or renewed, if a licence is not taken out or renewed, by the dealer or if any of the conditions of a licence taken out or renewed by him are contravened or are not observed, the sales of the dealer, with effect from the commencement of the year in which such contravention or non- observance took place, may be assessed to tax or taxes under section 3, as if the provisions of section 5 or of the notification under section 6, as the case may be, did not apply to such sales and notwithstanding that a licence, if any, taken out or renewed by the dealer continued or continues to be in force during the year\nMADRAS GENERAL SALES TAX (TURNOVER AND ASSESSMENT) RULES. Rule 4(1). Save as provided in sub-rule (2) the gross turnover of a dealer for the purposes of these rules shall be the amount for which goods are sold by the dealer. In the case of the undermentioned goods turnover of a dealer for the purposes of these rules shall be the amount for which the goods are bought by the dealer\n(c) untanned hides and skins bought by a licensed tanner in the State, and (d) untanned hides and skins exported outside the State by a licensed dealer in hides or skins.\nRule 15(1). Rules 6 to 13 shall not apply to licensed tanners and other licensed dealers in hides or skins in respect of their dealings in hides or skins but the provisions of this and the following rule shall apply to them in respect of such dealings. Rule 16(1). In the case of hides and skins, the tax payable under section 3(1) shall be levied in accordance with the provisions of this rule.\nNo tax shall be levied on the sale of untanned hides or skins by a licensed dealer in hides or skins except at the stage at which such hides or skins are sold to a tanner in the State or are sold for export outside the State in the case of all untanned hides or skins sold to a tanner in the State, the tax shall be levied from the tanner on the amount for which the hides or skins are bought by him\nIn the case of all untanned hides or skins which are not sold to a tanner in the State but are exported outside the State, the tax shall be levied from the dealer who was the last dealer not exempt from taxation under section 3(3), who buys them in the State on the amount for which they were bought by him. Sale of hides or skins by dealers other than licensed dealers in hides or skins shall,subject to the provisions of section 3, be liable to taxation on each occasion of sale. Rule 5(1) of the ax Rules provides - Every person who (d) deals in hides and or skins whether as a tanner, or otherwise, or shall, if he desires to avail himself of the exemption provided in sections 5 and 8 or of the concession of single point taxation provided in section 6, submit an application in Form 1 for a licence in respect of each of his places of business to the authority specified in sub- rule (2) so as to reach him not later than the 15th day of October, 1939\nSection 3 is the general charging section under which tax is levied in the manner prescribed in the turnover of a dealer, except that a dealer whose turnover is less than Rs. 10,000/- is exempted from sales tax.\nSection 3 envisages multipoint taxation on the total turnover of a dealer. In the case of the sale transactions of certain specified goods set out in s. 5 of the Act an exception is made. That section provides for single point taxation subject to certain prescribed restrictions and conditions\nBy sub-s. (vi) of that section sales of hides and skins are liable to tax under s.3, sub-s. (1), at one single point in the series of sales by successive dealers\nThe language of the section (s.5) shows however that this exemption applies subject to certain restrictions and conditions which include conditions as to licences. The rule, which deals with licences is r. 5 of the Sales Tax Rules, the relevant portion of which has already been set out It lays down that if a dealer desires to avail himself of the exemption provided in ss. 5 and 8 or of the concession as to taxation in s. 5 only at a single point, then he must obtain a licence as prescribed in that rule. If the restrictions and conditions contemplated by s. 5 read with the rules are not complied with, certain consequences follow as a result of s. 6-A of the Act which specifically states that where a condition prescribed or notified requires the taking out or the renewal of a licence, then in the case of contravention of such conditions or restrictions the tax is to be levied under s. 3 as if the provisions of s. 5 did not apply to such sales\nThis, therefore, is a clear provision which makes the single point imposition of sales tax on hides and skins to be conditional on observing the condition of taking a licence. The argument of inconsistency between r. 16(5) of the Turnover and Assessment Rules and s. 5(vi) of the Act which was accepted in the High Court receives no support from the language of that section which is a concessional provision for making the sales of hides and skins liable to taxation at a single point but that, as the opening words of the section show, is subject to restrictions and conditions prescribed in the rules and one of these conditions is the taking of a licence.\nAll that r. 16(5) does is to emphasise the consequences of non- observance of the conditions which ss. 5(vi) 6-A have in clear terms prescribed. We find no inconsistency between the rule and the sections of the Act.\nIt is not disputed on behalf of the Government that Rule 16(5) is repugnant to section 5(vi).\n It must therefore be held to be ultra vires\nBut this can bring no relief to the petitioners, as they are all licensed tanners and are in no manner hurt by the operation of r. 16(5)\nLastly, the learned advocate urges that rule 16 (5) clearly contravenes the provisions of section 5(vi) of the Act. This sub-rule has been held to be ultra vires by the High Court, and indeed, the learned Advocate General of Madras did not in the High Court, as before us, dispute that rule 16(5) was repugnant to ,section 5(vi). That sub-rule, however affects only unlicensed dealers and the appellants who are admittedly licensed dealers are not affected by that sub-rule .", + "expert_4": "Against the judgment and order of the High Court of Madras allowing a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution.\nThe question there raised was the legality of the assessment of Sales Tax by appellant No. 2, the Deputy Commercial Sales Tax Officer, Saidapet, under the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939 (Act IX of 1939), hereinafter termed the Act.\nThe respondent was a partnership firm carrying on tannery business at Chromepet near the city of Madras.\nIt was assessed to sales tax of Rs. 10,584 on a turnover of Rs. 6,77,374-4-4. It filed a petition under Art. 226 to quash the assessment order on the ground that the order was illegal and not supported by the authority of law.\nThis contention was accepted by the High Court and the petition was allowed with costs.\nThe consequence of the judgment is that the respondent firm which is not a licensed dealer under the Act is not liable to any sales tax in respect of its dealings in hides and skins.\nThe contention of the respondent firm in the High Court was that under s. 5, cl. (vi) of the Act, the liability to pay sales tax in respect of hides and skins could only be at a single point that the rule limiting the operation of this mode of taxation to licensed dealers was ultra vires and therefore r. 16(5) of the Madras General Sales Tax (Turnover and Assessment) Rules, 1939, hereinafter called the Turnover and Assessment Rules, was void and inoperative and had been. so held by the Supreme Court in V. M. Syed Mohammed Co. v. The State of Madras(1) that accepting this interpretation the State of Madras had deleted cl. (5) of r. 16 by G. 0. 450, Revenue, dated February 26, 1954, i.e., two days before the making of the assessment order under dispute that r. 16(5) of the Turnover and Assessment Rules was the only provision imposing a multiple tax in respect of sales of hides and skins by unlicensed dealers and that the imposition of the sales tax after the repeal of that rule was illegal and the tax was without the authority of law.\nIt was also contended that in the taxation scheme under the Act, hides and skins, because of their importance in the international market, were excluded from the direct operation of s. 3(1) of the Act which was the general charging section and were given special protection of the single point taxation under s. 5(vi).\nThe (1) 1954 S.C.R. 1117. argument, therefore, was that in the case of sales of hides and skins the general provision was inapplicable and a special rule for taxation was laid down by s. 5(vi) of the Act.\nThe High Court held that in the case of hides and it skins the charge levied by s. 3 is subject to the pro. visions of S. 5 and in the case of licensed dealers in hides and skins, the charging provision is r. 16 of the Turnover and Assessment Rules .\nThe High Court further held that r. 16(5) of the Turnover and Assessment Rules which restricted the benefit of single point taxation to licensed dealers was ultra vires as it contravened s. 5(vi) of the Act and s. 6-A was not applicable to the case of a dealer who did not take out a licence for dealing in hides and skins and further that if r. 16(5) was ultra vires as being in contravention of s. 5(vi), r. 5, of the Madras General Sales Tax Rules (hereinafter called the Sales Tax Rules) which requires the taking out of the licence in order to be able to get the benefit of single point taxation would also be ultra vires.\nThus on a true construction of s. 3(1) and s. 5(vi) it was of the opinion that r. 5 of the Sales Tax Rules and r. 16(5) of the Turnover and Assessment Rules were ultra vires and s. 6A was inapplicable to a person who had not taken out a licence. As a consequence it quashed the order of assessment of the respondent firm.\nThey are as follows- S. 3(1) Subject to the provisions of this Act,- (a) every dealer shall pay for each year a tax on his total turnover for such year and A dealer whose total turnover in any year is less than ten thousand rupees shall not be liable to pay any tax for that year under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2).\nFor the purposes of this section and the other provisions of this Act, turnover shall be determined in accordance with such rules as may be prescribed \n The taxes under sub-sections (1) and (2) shall be assessed, levied and collected in such manner and in such instalments, if any, as may be prescribed S. 5.\nSubject to such restrictions and conditions as may be prescribed, including conditions as to licences and licence fees. the sale of hides and skins, whether tanned or untanned shall be liable to tax under section 3, subsection (1), only at such single point in the series of sales by successive dealers as may be prescribed.\nS. 6A.\nIf any restrictions or conditions prescribed under section 5 or notified under section 6 are contravened or are not observed by a dealer, or in case a condition so prescribed or notified requires that a licence shall be taken out or renewed, if a licence is not taken out or renewed, by the dealer or if any of the conditions of a licence taken out or renewed by him are contravened or are not observed, the sales of the dealer, with effect from the commencement of the year in which such contravention or non- observance took place, may be assessed to tax or taxes under section 3, as if the provisions of section 5 or of the notification under section 6, as the case may be, did not apply to such sales and notwithstanding that a licence, if any, taken out or renewed by the dealer continued or continues to be in force during the year .\nMADRAS GENERAL SALES TAX (TURNOVER AND ASSESSMENT) RULES. Rule 4(1). Save as provided in sub-rule (2) the gross turnover of a dealer for the purposes of these rules shall be the amount for which goods are sold by the dealer.\nIn the case of the undermentioned goods turnover of a dealer for the purposes of these rules shall be the amount for which the goods are bought by the dealer. (c) untanned hides and skins bought by a licensed tanner in the State, and (d) untanned hides and skins exported outside the State by a licensed dealer in hides or skins.\nRule 16(1). In the case of hides and skins, the tax payable under section 3(1) shall be levied in accordance with the provisions of this rule.\nNo tax shall be levied on the sale of untanned hides or skins by a licensed dealer in hides or skins except at the stage at which such hides or skins are sold to a tanner in the State or are sold for export outside the State in the case of all untanned hides or skins sold to a tanner in the State, the tax shall be levied from the tanner on the amount for which the hides or skins are bought by him.\nSale of hides or skins by dealers other than licensed dealers in hides or skins shall,subject to the provisions of section 3, be liable to taxation on each occasion of sale.\nRule 5(1) of the ax Rules provides - Every person who (d) deals in hides and or skins whether as a tanner, or otherwise, or shall, if he desires to avail himself of the exemption provided in sections 5 and 8 or of the concession of single point taxation provided in section 6, submit an application in Form 1 for a licence in respect of each of his places of business to the authority specified in sub- rule (2) so as to reach him not later than the 15th day of October, 1939 .\nThe scheme of taxation under the Act is this. Section 3 is the general charging section under which tax is levied in the manner prescribed in the turnover of a dealer, except that a dealer whose turnover is less than Rs. 10,000/- is exempted from sales tax.\n Section 3 envisages multipoint taxation on the total turnover of a dealer.\nIn the case of the sale transactions of certain specified goods set out in s. 5 of the Act an exception is made. That section provides for single point taxation subject to certain prescribed restrictions and conditions.\nThe language of the section (s.5) shows however that this exemption applies subject to certain restrictions and conditions which include conditions as to licences.\nThe rule, which deals with licences is r. 5 of the Sales Tax Rules, the relevant portion of which has already been set out It lays down that if a dealer desires to avail himself of the exemption provided in ss. 5 and 8 or of the concession as to taxation in s. 5 only at a single point, then he must obtain a licence as prescribed in that rule.\nIf the restrictions and conditions contemplated by s. 5 read with the rules are not complied with, certain consequences follow as a result of s. 6-A of the Act which specifically states that where a condition prescribed or notified requires the taking out or the renewal of a licence, then in the case of contravention of such conditions or restrictions the tax is to be levied under s. 3 as if the provisions of s. 5 did not apply to such sales.\nThis, therefore, is a clear provision which makes the single point imposition of sales tax on hides and skins to be conditional on observing the condition of taking a licence.\nThe argument of inconsistency between r. 16(5) of the Turnover and Assessment Rules and s. 5(vi) of the Act which was accepted in the High Court receives no support from the language of that section which is a concessional provision for making the sales of hides and skins liable to taxation at a single point but that, as the opening words of the section show, is subject to restrictions and conditions prescribed in the rules and one of these conditions is the taking of a licence.\nAll that r. 16(5) does is to emphasise the consequences of non- observance of the conditions which ss. 5(vi) 6-A have in clear terms prescribed. We find no inconsistency between the rule and the sections of the Act.\nBut it was submitted that this Court on appeal from a judgment of the Madras High Court had sId r. 16(5) to be ultra vires the Act.\nThat contention is based on the judgment of the Madras High Court in V. M. Syed Mohammed Company v.\nThe State of Madras (1) which on appeal was affirmed by this Court (2).\nThis contention is not well-founded.\nIn that case, when it was in the Madras High Court, it was contended that the rules did not properly carry out the policy underlying the Act, which was to keep the price of hides and skins at a competitive level for the world market.\nFor this reason multiple taxation was violative of s. 5(vi) of the Act.\nThis, it appears, was not disputed by the Government and it was therefore held that r. 16(5) of the Turnover and Assessment Rules was ultra vires.\nBut the question was really (\nV. M. Syed Mohammed and Company v.\nThe State of Andhra, 1954 S.C.R. 1117. not relevant to the issue as was pointed out by Venkatarama Ayyar, J., at p. 394, where he said- Now the contention of the petitioners is that where there are sales by unlicensed dealers to unlicensed tanners or unlicensed dealers, there is the possibility of multiple taxation and that would be in violation of section 5(vi).\nIt is not disputed on behalf of the Government that Rule 16(5) is repugnant to section 5(vi).\n It must therefore be held to be ultra vires. But this can bring no relief to the petitioners, as they are all licensed tanners and are in no manner hurt by the operation of r. 16(5).\nThat sub-rule, however affects only unlicensed dealers and the appellants who are admittedly licensed dealers are not affected by that sub-rule .", + "expert_5": "Subject to the provisions of this Act,- (a) every dealer shall pay for each year a tax on his total turnover for such year and A dealer whose total turnover in any year is less than ten thousand rupees shall not be liable to pay any tax for that year under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2).\nFor the purposes of this section and the other provisions of this Act, turnover shall be determined in accordance with such rules as may be prescribed \n The taxes under sub-sections (1) and (2) shall be assessed, levied and collected in such manner and in such instalments, if any, as may be prescribed S. 5.\nSubject to such restrictions and conditions as may be prescribed, including conditions as to licences and licence fees. the sale of hides and skins, whether tanned or untanned shall be liable to tax under section 3, subsection (1), only at such single point in the series of sales by successive dealers as may be prescribed.\nSave as provided in sub-rule (2) the gross turnover of a dealer for the purposes of these rules shall be the amount for which goods are sold by the dealer. In the case of the undermentioned goods turnover of a dealer for the purposes of these rules shall be the amount for which the goods are bought by the dealer. (c) untanned hides and skins bought by a licensed tanner in the State, and (d) untanned hides and skins exported outside the State by a licensed dealer in hides or skins.\nRules 6 to 13 shall not apply to licensed tanners and other licensed dealers in hides or skins in respect of their dealings in hides or skins but the provisions of this and the following rule shall apply to them in respect of such dealings.\nIn the case of hides and skins, the tax payable under section 3(1) shall be levied in accordance with the provisions of this rule.\nNo tax shall be levied on the sale of untanned hides or skins by a licensed dealer in hides or skins except at the stage at which such hides or skins are sold to a tanner in the State or are sold for export outside the State in the case of all untanned hides or skins sold to a tanner in the State, the tax shall be levied from the tanner on the amount for which the hides or skins are bought by him. \n In the case of all untanned hides or skins which are not sold to a tanner in the State but are exported outside the State, the tax shall be levied from the dealer who was the last dealer not exempt from taxation under section 3(3), who buys them in the State on the amount for which they were bought by him. Sale of hides or skins by dealers other than licensed dealers in hides or skins shall,subject to the provisions of section 3, be liable to taxation on each occasion of sale.\nif a dealer desires to avail himself of the exemption provided in ss. 5 and 8 or of the concession as to taxation in s. 5 only at a single point, then he must obtain a licence as prescribed in that rule.\nIf the restrictions and conditions contemplated by s. 5 read with the rules are not complied with, certain consequences follow as a result of s. 6-A of the Act which specifically states that where a condition prescribed or notified requires the taking out or the renewal of a licence, then in the case of contravention of such conditions or restrictions the tax is to be levied under s. 3 as if the provisions of s. 5 did not apply to such sales.\nThis, therefore, is a clear provision which makes the single point imposition of sales tax on hides and skins to be conditional on observing the condition of taking a licence.\nThe argument of inconsistency between r. 16(5) of the Turnover and Assessment Rules and s. 5(vi) of the Act which was accepted in the High Court receives no support from the language of that section which is a concessional provision for making the sales of hides and skins liable to taxation at a single point but that, as the opening words of the section show, is subject to restrictions and conditions prescribed in the rules and one of these conditions is the taking of a licence.\nAll that r. 16(5) does is to emphasise the consequences of non- observance of the conditions which ss. 5(vi) 6-A have in clear terms prescribed.\nWe find no inconsistency between the rule and the sections of the Act.\nBut the question was really (1) (1952) 3 S.T.C. 367. V. M. Syed Mohammed and Company v. The State of Andhra, 1954 S.C.R. 1117. not relevant to the issue as was pointed out by Venkatarama Ayyar, J.\nNow the contention of the petitioners is that where there are sales by unlicensed dealers to unlicensed tanners or unlicensed dealers, there is the possibility of multiple taxation and that would be in violation of section 5(vi). It is not disputed on behalf of the Government that Rule 16(5) is repugnant to section 5(vi).\n It must therefore be held to be ultra vires.\nBut this can bring no relief to the petitioners, as they are all licensed tanners and are in no manner hurt by the operation of r. 16(5).\nThat sub-rule, however affects only unlicensed dealers and the appellants who are admittedly licensed dealers are not affected by that sub-rule ." + }, + "1960_12": { + "expert_1": "The question that arises for decision is whether the annual cash allowance paid to the appellant in circumstances stated below falls within paragraph 15(1)(i) of the Part B States (Taxation Concessions) Order, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as the Order) and is therefore exempt from income-tax.\nOn June 19, 1950, the grant of the village was liable to income-tax because in his view the appellant received that sum in exchange for two assets - right to the old maintenance allowance and the right to enjoy income from the village during her lifetime. On appeal to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner the amount of Rs. 35,807 was held to be liable to tax and not the sum of Rs. 24,193. An appeal was then taken to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal which held that the entire sum was exempt from income-tax and super-tax, as it fell within paragraph 15(1)(i) of the Order.\n The Tribunal said In the circumstances of the case stated above, it appears to us that the sum of Rs. 60,000 is exempt from income-tax and super-tax. If you look at the substance of the transaction, it means that the assessee was granted a maintenance allowance of Rs. 60,000. The assessee wanted somehow or other to be associated with the village Mota Dahisara. To her it was a question of prestige. Again the cash annuity of Rs. 35,807 was given to the assessee in lieu of the village Mota Dahisara.\nThe village was granted to her for the purpose of maintaining the assessees status and reputation as the Raj Mata. In other words, the village was given to her for her maintenance.\nAt the instance of the respondent following question was referred under section 6(1) of the Income-tax Act to the High Court Whether there was material for the Tribunal to hold that the sum of Rs. 35,807 granted to the assessee was a maintenance allowance exempt within the meaning of paragraph 15(1)(i) of the Part B States (Taxation Concessions) Order, 1950 ? which was framed by the High Court as follows Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case the sum of Rs. 35,807 granted to the assessee was a maintenance allowance exempt within the meaning of paragraph 15(1)(i) of the Part B States (Taxation Concessions) Order, 1950\nThe High Court held that Rs. 35,807 and Rs. 24,193 were two distinct heads of cash annuities, the former in lieu of village Mota Dahisara and the latter by way of Jiwai, i.e., maintenance. It was of the opinion that the appellant was granted Jiwai (maintenance) of Rs. 5,000 per month by her husband as from September, 1947. It also held that the grant of the village was not by way of maintenance. After taking into consideration the several documents, that is, the grant, the letter of the appellants son dated March 23, 1949, to the Rajpramukh of Saurashtra, the letter dated November 19, 1949, of the appellants husband to Mr. Buch and the resolution of the Government dated March 30, 1950, the High Court held that under the resolution of the Saurashtra Government the appellant was given a cash annuity of Rs. 35,807 in lieu of the village and not by way of maintenance. Against this judgment, the appellant has come to this court in appeal by special leave.\n The controversy between the parties is confined to the nature of the grant of the village made to the appellant.\nThe appellant contended that the grant of the village was as much maintenance as was the cash allowance which had been made to her before, and therefore it fell within the exemption under paragraph 15(1)(i) of the Order which is as follows \n Any income falling within the following classes shall be exempt from income-tax and super-tax and shall not be included in the total income or total world income of the person receiving them \n any sum which the widow or the mother of a person who was the Ruler of an Indian State receives as her maintenance allowance out of public revenue.\nIn our opinion the connection of the appellant is well founded.\nThe Tribunal has found after going into all the documents including the document containing the words to maintain her status and dignity and the letter of the appellants husband to Mr. Buch which mentioned the word Abru that the grant of the village was by way of maintenance and merely because the appellants relations wanted a face-saving device by splitting up the total amount payable per year it would not change the nature of the transaction nor would it change the grant of maintenance made to the appellant into something else.\n The grant of the village was as much by way of maintenance as was the cash allowance called Jiwai.\nMaintenance must vary according to the position and status of a person. It does not only mean food and raiment.\nIt is true that the appellant was anxious to retain the village because that gave her the satisfaction of having agricultural land which would be a tangible asset providing her a sure source of income but, merely because she wanted the village and in the resolution of March 30, 1950, mention is made of a sum an lieu of income from the village, the nature of the grant which in this case was by way of maintenance would not change.\n The question which was referred to the High Court was whether there was material to hold that the sum of Rs. 35,807 was maintenance allowance, but the High Court reformulated this question and after going into various documents it came to a conclusion different from that of the Tribunal and it reversed the findings of the Tribunal and answered the question in a manner suggestive of an appellate rather than advisory jurisdiction.", + "expert_2": "The assessee, Her Highness Maharani Kesarkunverba Saheb, the Raj Mata of Morvi State, is the appellant and the Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay North, is the respondent. The question that arises for decision is whether the annual cash allowance paid to the appellant in circumstances stated below falls within paragraph 15(1)(i) of the Part B States (Taxation Concessions) Order, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as the Order) and is therefore exempt from income-tax.\nresolution was passed by the son of the appellant granting a village, Mota Dahisara, to the appellant. The relevant portion of this resolution was as follows \n From ancient times there has been a tradition in our family to grant a village to the Maharani for her enjoyment in order to maintain her status and dignity.\nOn March 20, 1948, the State of Morvi became a part of the Saurashtra Union. The Government of Saurashtra refused to continue the maintenance allowance or to recognise the grant of the village Mota Dahisara to the appellant.\nOn March 30, 1950, the Government of Saurashtra passed a resolution that in pursuance of the decision taken at the Jamnagar Conference the grant of the village Mota Dahisara would be resumed and in lieu thereof a cash annuity of Rs. 35,807 would be paid. The appellant was also granted Jiwai as Rajmata of Rs. 24,193 per annum and thus a sum of Rs. 60,000 per annum, i.e., Rs. 5,000 per mensum, was continued to be paid to the appellant.\nThe assessee wanted somehow or other to be associated with the village Mota Dahisara. To her it was a question of prestige. Again the cash annuity of Rs. 35,807 was given to the assessee in lieu of the village Mota Dahisara. The village was granted to her for the purpose of maintaining the assessees status and reputation as the Raj Mata.\nThe controversy between the parties is confined to the nature of the grant of the village made to the appellant.\nThe appellant contended that the grant of the village was as much maintenance as was the cash allowance which had been made to her before, and therefore it fell within the exemption under paragraph 15(1)(i) of the Order which is as follows \n Any income falling within the following classes shall be exempt from income-tax and super-tax and shall not be included in the total income or total world income of the person receiving them \n any sum which the widow or the mother of a person who was the Ruler of an Indian State receives as her maintenance allowance out of public revenue.\nThe Tribunal has found after going into all the documents including the document containing the words to maintain her status and dignity and the letter of the appellants husband to Mr. Buch which mentioned the word Abru that the grant of the village was by way of maintenance and merely because the appellants relations wanted a face-saving device by splitting up the total amount payable per year it would not change the nature of the transaction nor would it change the grant of maintenance made to the appellant into something else.\n The grant of the village was as much by way of maintenance as was the cash allowance called Jiwai.", + "expert_3": "The assessee, Her Highness Maharani Kesarkunverba Saheb, the Raj Mata of Morvi State, is the appellant and the Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay North, is the respondent. The question that arises for decision is whether the annual cash allowance paid to the appellant in circumstances stated below falls within paragraph 15(1)(i) of the Part B States (Taxation Concessions) Order, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as the Order) and is therefore exempt from income-tax.\nThe appellant was receiving from the Morvi State since 1922 an allowance called Jiwai (maintenance allowance). By a resolution dated September 26, 1946, passed by His Highness Lukhdhirji of Morvi, the husband of the appellant, it was resolved that a sum of Rs. 5,000 per month be paid to the appellant and provision be made for the amount by the Treasury Office in the Budget in the same manner as before.\nOn January 21, 1947, His Highness Lukhdhirji abdicated and his son His Highness Mahendra Sinhji succeeded to the rulership. The covenant for the formation of the Kathiawar States Union was signed on January 23, 1948.\nOn February 26, 1948, a resolution was passed by the son of the appellant granting a village, Mota Dahisara, to the appellant. The relevant portion of this resolution was as follows \n From ancient times there has been a tradition in our family to grant a village to the Maharani for her enjoyment in order to maintain her status and dignity. However, since a village remains to be granted accordingly to our revered mother, Akhand-Sau-Bhagyawana Kesar Kunverba Sahib as the Maharani, it is resolved to grant her the village of Mota Dahisara, under (our) control and having the area and boundaries as per annexures hereto. We resolve to grant the said village, for enjoyment to out Maharani, Shri Vijaykunver of Rangpur, after the lifetime of our mother Kesar Kunverba Sahib in accordance with the above tradition\nA formal grant was made on March 16, 1948,\nOn March 20, 1948, the State of Morvi became a part of the Saurashtra Union. The Government of Saurashtra refused to continue the maintenance allowance or to recognise the grant of the village Mota Dahisara to the appellant\nShe then made certain representations and after some conferences and some discussion a copy of the order of the Political Department was sent to the appellant in which it was stated that the village would be resumed and an amount calculated on the basis of average revenue of the village for 3 years would be paid to her as cash allowance for lifetime\nTo this the appellant took objection and her son the Maharaja of Morvi also wrote a letter to the Rajpramukh of Saurashtra stating that the village had been illegally resumed and that her Jiwai had also been stopped. To this the Rajpramukh replied on May 19, 1949, saying that it had been decided that the village would be resumed and a cash allowance in lieu thereof would be paid to the appellant for life and he advised the Maharaja of Morvi not to press the claim as put forward in his letter and also that the appellant should accept the resumption of the village and agree to take a cash allowance instead. The appellant then wrote a letter to the Rajpramukh on May 26, 1949, in which she insisted that she should continue to have the village\nOn November 19, 1949, the appellants husband wrote to the Regional Commissioner, Mr. Buch, stating that he and her son, the Ruler, had with difficulty persuaded the appellant to accept Rs. 5,000 a month and not to insist on anything more\nThe following extract from the letter is rather important and is therefore quoted Most ladies are sentimental and she is no exception, and says her Abru would go if she loses her village, so we suggested that if she gets the income of the village, whatever it may be and any amount over and above that will be given to her as Jiwai, making a total of Rs. 60,000 a year with this she can say she got both the things and her prestige will not suffer\nOn March 30, 1950, the Government of Saurashtra passed a resolution that in pursuance of the decision taken at the Jamnagar Conference the grant of the village Mota Dahisara would be resumed and in lieu thereof a cash annuity of Rs. 35,807 would be paid. The appellant was also granted Jiwai as Rajmata of Rs. 24,193 per annum and thus a sum of Rs. 60,000 per annum, i.e., Rs. 5,000 per mensum, was continued to be paid to the appellant\nOn June 19, 1950, the grant of the village was liable to income-tax because in his view the appellant received that sum in exchange for two assets - right to the old maintenance allowance and the right to enjoy income from the village during her lifetime. On appeal to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner the amount of Rs. 35,807 was held to be liable to tax and not the sum of Rs. 24,193. An appeal was then taken to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal which held that the entire sum was exempt from income-tax and super-tax, as it fell within paragraph 15(1)(i) of the Order\nThe Tribunal said In the circumstances of the case stated above, it appears to us that the sum of Rs. 60,000 is exempt from income-tax and super-tax. If you look at the substance of the transaction, it means that the assessee was granted a maintenance allowance of Rs. 60,000\nAgain the cash annuity of Rs. 35,807 was given to the assessee in lieu of the village Mota Dahisara.\nThe village was granted to her for the purpose of maintaining the assessees status and reputation as the Raj Mata. In other words, the village was given to her for her maintenance\nAt the instance of the respondent following question was referred under section 6(1) of the Income-tax Act to the High Court Whether there was material for the Tribunal to hold that the sum of Rs. 35,807 granted to the assessee was a maintenance allowance exempt within the meaning of paragraph 15(1)(i) of the Part B States (Taxation Concessions) Order, 1950 ? which was framed by the High Court as follows Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case the sum of Rs. 35,807 granted to the assessee was a maintenance allowance exempt within the meaning of paragraph 15(1)(i) of the Part B States (Taxation Concessions) Order, 1950 ? The High Court held that Rs. 35,807 and Rs. 24,193 were two distinct heads of cash annuities, the former in lieu of village Mota Dahisara and the latter by way of Jiwai, i.e., maintenance\nIt was of the opinion that the appellant was granted Jiwai (maintenance) of Rs. 5,000 per month by her husband as from September, 1947. It also held that the grant of the village was not by way of maintenance\nAfter taking into consideration the several documents, that is, the grant, the letter of the appellants son dated March 23, 1949, to the Rajpramukh of Saurashtra, the letter dated November 19, 1949, of the appellants husband to Mr. Buch and the resolution of the Government dated March 30, 1950, the High Court held that under the resolution of the Saurashtra Government the appellant was given a cash annuity of Rs. 35,807 in lieu of the village and not by way of maintenance. Against this judgment, the appellant has come to this court in appeal by special leave\nThe controversy between the parties is confined to the nature of the grant of the village made to the appellant\nThe appellant contended that the grant of the village was as much maintenance as was the cash allowance which had been made to her before, and therefore it fell within the exemption under paragraph 15(1)(i) of the Order which is as follows \n Any income falling within the following classes shall be exempt from income-tax and super-tax and shall not be included in the total income or total world income of the person receiving them \n any sum which the widow or the mother of a person who was the Ruler of an Indian State receives as her maintenance allowance out of public revenue\nIn our opinion the connection of the appellant is well founded. The Tribunal has found after going into all the documents including the document containing the words to maintain her status and dignity and the letter of the appellants husband to Mr. Buch which mentioned the word Abru that the grant of the village was by way of maintenance and merely because the appellants relations wanted a face-saving device by splitting up the total amount payable per year it would not change the nature of the transaction nor would it change the grant of maintenance made to the appellant into something else.\nThe grant of the village was as much by way of maintenance as was the cash allowance called Jiwai. Maintenance must vary according to the position and status of a person\nIt does not only mean food and raiment\nThe appellant was the wife of a ruling prince and at the time the grant of the village was made, she was the Raj Mata and therefore neither the use of the words status and dignity nor the reference to ancient usage could in any way change the nature of the grant. It is true that the appellant was anxious to retain the village because that gave her the satisfaction of having agricultural land which would be a tangible asset providing her a sure source of income but, merely because she wanted the village and in the resolution of March 30, 1950, mention is made of a sum an lieu of income from the village, the nature of the grant which in this case was by way of maintenance would not change\nThe question which was referred to the High Court was whether there was material to hold that the sum of Rs. 35,807 was maintenance allowance, but the High Court reformulated this question and after going into various documents it came to a conclusion different from that of the Tribunal and it reversed the findings of the Tribunal and answered the question in a manner suggestive of an appellate rather than advisory jurisdiction.", + "expert_4": "The assessee, Her Highness Maharani Kesarkunverba Saheb, the Raj Mata of Morvi State, is the appellant and the Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay North, is the respondent.\nThe question that arises for decision is whether the annual cash allowance paid to the appellant in circumstances stated below falls within paragraph 15(1)(i) of the Part B States (Taxation Concessions) Order, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as the Order) and is therefore exempt from income-tax.\nThe appellant was receiving from the Morvi State since 1922 an allowance called Jiwai (maintenance allowance).\nA formal grant was made on March 16, 1948, which was as follows In order to preserve permanently your status and dignity the village of Mouje Mota Dahisarais hereby granted to you as a gift in pursuance of the immemorial tradition of this State The said village and the land etc., thereof have been granted to you in order to maintain your status and dignity as the Queen Mother as stated above. You may enjoy the same in peace exclusively.\nOn your death the right of enjoyment of the entire right, together with the restrictions mentioned in the present writing, shall vest in our Akhan Saubhagvanta Maharani Shri Vijay Kunvar of Rangpur.\nThe Government of Saurashtra refused to continue the maintenance allowance or to recognise the grant of the village Mota Dahisara to the appellant. She then made certain representations and after some conferences and some discussion a copy of the order of the Political Department was sent to the appellant in which it was stated that the village would be resumed and an amount calculated on the basis of average revenue of the village for 3 years would be paid to her as cash allowance for lifetime.\nOn March 30, 1950, the Government of Saurashtra passed a resolution that in pursuance of the decision taken at the Jamnagar Conference the grant of the village Mota Dahisara would be resumed and in lieu thereof a cash annuity of Rs. 35,807 would be paid.\nThe appellant was also granted Jiwai as Rajmata of Rs. 24,193 per annum and thus a sum of Rs. 60,000 per annum, i.e., Rs. 5,000 per mensum, was continued to be paid to the appellant.\nThe Tribunal said In the circumstances of the case stated above, it appears to us that the sum of Rs. 60,000 is exempt from income-tax and super-tax.\nAt the instance of the respondent following question was referred under section 6(1) of the Income-tax Act to the High Court Whether there was material for the Tribunal to hold that the sum of Rs. 35,807 granted to the assessee was a maintenance allowance exempt within the meaning of paragraph 15(1)(i) of the Part B States (Taxation Concessions) Order, 1950 ?\nwhich was framed by the High Court as follows Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case the sum of Rs. 35,807 granted to the assessee was a maintenance allowance exempt within the meaning of paragraph 15(1)(i) of the Part B States (Taxation Concessions) Order, 1950 ?\nThe High Court held that Rs. 35,807 and Rs. 24,193 were two distinct heads of cash annuities, the former in lieu of village Mota Dahisara and the latter by way of Jiwai, i.e., maintenance.\nthe High Court held that under the resolution of the Saurashtra Government the appellant was given a cash annuity of Rs. 35,807 in lieu of the village and not by way of maintenance.\nAgainst this judgment, the appellant has come to this court in appeal by special leave.\nThe controversy between the parties is confined to the nature of the grant of the village made to the appellant.\nThe appellant contended that the grant of the village was as much maintenance as was the cash allowance which had been made to her before, and therefore it fell within the exemption under paragraph 15(1)(i) of the Order which is as follows \n Any income falling within the following classes shall be exempt from income-tax and super-tax and shall not be included in the total income or total world income of the person receiving them \n any sum which the widow or the mother of a person who was the Ruler of an Indian State receives as her maintenance allowance out of public revenue.\nThe respondent on the other hand submitted that the words of the resolution dated February 26, 1949, and of the grant and particularly the following recitals therein From ancient times there has been a tradition in our family to grant a village to the Maha Rani for her enjoyment in order to maintain her status and dignity showed that the grant of the village was not by way of maintenance but merely to maintain a tradition of the family for keeping up the status and dignity of the appellant, and this, it was submitted, was fortified by the letter of the appellants husband dated November 19, 1949, where His Highness stated that the appellants Abru (prestige) would go if she were to lose the village.\nIn our opinion the connection of the appellant is well founded.\nThe Tribunal has found after going into all the documents including the document containing the words to maintain her status and dignity and the letter of the appellants husband to Mr. Buch which mentioned the word Abru that the grant of the village was by way of maintenance and merely because the appellants relations wanted a face-saving device by splitting up the total amount payable per year it would not change the nature of the transaction nor would it change the grant of maintenance made to the appellant into something else.\nThe grant of the village was as much by way of maintenance as was the cash allowance called Jiwai.\nMaintenance must vary according to the position and status of a person. It does not only mean food and raiment.\nThe appellant was the wife of a ruling prince and at the time the grant of the village was made, she was the Raj Mata and therefore neither the use of the words status and dignity nor the reference to ancient usage could in any way change the nature of the grant.\nIt is true that the appellant was anxious to retain the village because that gave her the satisfaction of having agricultural land which would be a tangible asset providing her a sure source of income but, merely because she wanted the village and in the resolution of March 30, 1950, mention is made of a sum an lieu of income from the village, the nature of the grant which in this case was by way of maintenance would not change.\nThe question which was referred to the High Court was whether there was material to hold that the sum of Rs. 35,807 was maintenance allowance, but the High Court reformulated this question and after going into various documents it came to a conclusion different from that of the Tribunal and it reversed the findings of the Tribunal and answered the question in a manner suggestive of an appellate rather than advisory jurisdiction.", + "expert_5": "From ancient times there has been a tradition in our family to grant a village to the Maharani for her enjoyment in order to maintain her status and dignity.\nher status and dignity\nIn order to preserve permanently your status and dignity the village of Mouje Mota Dahisarais hereby granted to you as a gift in pursuance of the immemorial tradition of this State The said village and the land etc., thereof have been granted to you in order to maintain your status and dignity as the Queen Mother as stated above.\nher Abru would go if she loses her village, so we suggested that if she gets the income of the village, whatever it may be\nwith this she can say she got both the things and her prestige will not suffer.\nTo her it was a question of prestige.\nThe village was granted to her for the purpose of maintaining the assessees status and reputation as the Raj Mata. In other words, the village was given to her for her maintenance.\nmerely because the appellants relations wanted a face-saving device by splitting up the total amount payable per year it would not change the nature of the transaction nor would it change the grant of maintenance made to the appellant into something else.\nMaintenance must vary according to the position and status of a person. It does not only mean food and raiment.\nThe appellant was the wife of a ruling prince and at the time the grant of the village was made, she was the Raj Mata and therefore neither the use of the words status and dignity nor the reference to ancient usage could in any way change the nature of the grant.\nmerely because she wanted the village and in the resolution of March 30, 1950, mention is made of a sum an lieu of income from the village, the nature of the grant which in this case was by way of maintenance would not change." + }, + "1960_265": { + "expert_1": "The firm thereupon filed the petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution for a writ of prohibition or other order or direction to the effect that the proceedings for realisation of the arrears under the Revenue Recovery Act be quashed.\n In the petition, the respondents urged that inasmuch as they were prosecuted under s. 19 of the Act and the Magistrate had issued warrants, the procedure for recovery under s. 13 was not available. They contended that under s. 386 of the Code of Criminal Procedure the warrant is to be deemed to be a decree and has to be executed according to civil process applicable to the execution of decrees under the Code of Civil Procedure. They, therefore, submitted that the procedure under s. 19 of the Act was no longer open, and could not be proceeded with.\nIn dealing with the question, the learned Judges of the High Court felt that s. 13 of the Act was in the nature of a general law, over which the special procedure prescribed by s. 19 of the Act read with s. 386 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was to prevail. They, however, thought that, since all the processes available under s. 19 of the Act were also available under s. 386 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, it was not necessary to decide what would happen if the proceedings under s. 386 came to nothing. They observed that if the question arose, they would consider it.\n The writ of prohibition was granted by the High Court.\nThe question which arises is whether s. 19 must be taken to prevail over s. 13 of the Act. Both the sections lay down the mode for recovery of arrears of tax, and, as has already been noticed by the High Court, lead to the application of the process for recovery by attachment and sale of movable and immovable properties, belonging to the tax-evader. It cannot be said that one proceeding is more general than the other, because there is much that is common between them, in so far as the mode of recovery is concerned.\nSection 19, in addition to recovery of the amount, gives the power to the Magistrate to convict and sentence the offender to fine or in default of payment of fine, to imprisonment.", + "expert_2": "A 1 to 4 admit that they failed to pay on demand by the competent authority, a sum of Rs. 1,01,716-4-3 due from them as sales tax for the years 1950 to 1954. This amount will be realised from A 1 to 4, jointly or severally, individually or collectively under the provisions of the Cr.P.C. for realisation of criminal fines, as if it were a fine imposed by this court on each accused individually and all of them together.\nThe authorities, however, started proceedings again under s. 13 of the Act read with the provisions of the Travancore- Cochin Revenue Recovery Act, 1951 (VII of 1951), to recover the amount as arrears of land revenue, and attached some properties belonging to the respondents within the jurisdiction of the second and third appellants, the Tahsildars of Kottayam and Kanjirappally Taluks. The firm thereupon filed the petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution for a writ of prohibition or other order or direction to the effect that the proceedings for realisation of the arrears under the Revenue Recovery Act be quashed.\n In the petition, the respondents urged that inasmuch as they were prosecuted under s. 19 of the Act and the Magistrate had issued warrants, the procedure for recovery under s. 13 was not available.\nIn dealing with the question, the learned Judges of the High Court felt that s. 13 of the Act was in the nature of a general law, over which the special procedure prescribed by s. 19 of the Act read with s. 386 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was to prevail. They, however, thought that, since all the processes available under s. 19 of the Act were also available under s. 386 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, it was not necessary to decide what would happen if the proceedings under s. 386 came to nothing.\nThe question which arises is whether s. 19 must be taken to prevail over s. 13 of the Act. Both the sections lay down the mode for recovery of arrears of tax, and, as has already been noticed by the High Court, lead to the application of the process for recovery by attachment and sale of movable and immovable properties, belonging to the tax-evader. It cannot be said that one proceeding is more general than the other, because there is much that is common between them, in so far as the mode of recovery is concerned. Section 19, in addition to recovery of the amount, gives the power to the Magistrate to convict and sentence the offender to fine or in default of payment of fine, to imprisonment.", + "expert_3": "The respondents were doing business in hill produce like pepper, ginger, betelnuts etc., and were assessed to sales tax under the Travancore-Cochin General Sales Tax Act XI of 1125 (referred to as the Act), for the years 1950 to 1954. The respondents have to pay a sum of Rs. 1,01,716-4-3 as tax.\nIn 1954, proceedings were started against them under s. 13 of the Act, which provides that if the tax is not paid as laid down in that section, the whole of the amount or such part thereof as remains due, may be recovered as if it were an arrears of land revenue. It appears that the pro- ceedings were not fruitful, and a prosecution under s. 19 of the Act was instituted against the partners in the Court of the First Class Magistrate, Ponkunnam.\nRespondents 2 to 5 pleaded guilty, and the Magistrate passed an order on October 18, 1955 as follows The sentence or other final order A 1 to 4 sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 50/- each and in default to undergo S. 1. for one month each.\n A 1 to 4 admit that they failed to pay on demand by the competent authority, a sum of Rs. 1,01,716-4-3 due from them as sales tax for the years 1950 to 1954. This amount will be realised from A 1 to 4, jointly or severally, individually or collectively under the provisions of the Cr.P.C. for realisation of criminal fines, as if it were a fine imposed by this court on each accused individually and all of them together.\nWarrants under s. 386 (1) (b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure were issued to the Collector of Kottayam District for recovery of the arrears of sales tax\nThe authorities, however, started proceedings again under s. 13 of the Act read with the provisions of the Travancore- Cochin Revenue Recovery Act, 1951 (VII of 1951), to recover the amount as arrears of land revenue, and attached some properties belonging to the respondents within the jurisdiction of the second and third appellants, the Tahsildars of Kottayam and Kanjirappally Taluks. The firm thereupon filed the petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution for a writ of prohibition or other order or direction to the effect that the proceedings for realisation of the arrears under the Revenue Recovery Act be quashed\nIn the petition, the respondents urged that inasmuch as they were prosecuted under s. 19 of the Act and the Magistrate had issued warrants, the procedure for recovery under s. 13 was not available. They contended that under s. 386 of the Code of Criminal Procedure the warrant is to be deemed to be a decree and has to be executed according to civil process applicable to the execution of decrees under the Code of Civil Procedure. They, therefore, submitted that the procedure under s. 19 of the Act was no longer open, and could not be proceeded with.\nSection 19 of the Act, so far as it is material, reads as follows Any person who (b) fails to pay within the time allowed, any tax assessed on him under this Act, or (d)fraudulently evades the payment of any tax assessed on him shall on conviction by a Magistrate of the first class, be liable to a fine which may extend to one thousand rupees and in the case of a conviction under clause (b), (d) the Magistrate shall specify in the order the tax which the person convicted has failed or evaded to pay and the tax so specified shall be recoverable as if it were a fine under the Code of Criminal Procedure for the timebeing in force.\nIn dealing with the question, the learned Judges of the High Court felt that s. 13 of the Act was in the nature of a general law, over which the special procedure prescribed by s. 19 of the Act read with s. 386 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was to prevail. They, however, thought that, since all the processes available under s. 19 of the Act were also available under s. 386 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, it was not necessary to decide what would happen if the proceedings under s. 386 came to nothing. They observed that if the question arose, they would consider it.\n The writ of prohibition was granted by the High Court.\nThe question which arises is whether s. 19 must be taken to prevail over s. 13 of the Act. Both the sections lay down the mode for recovery of arrears of tax, and, as has already been noticed by the High Court, lead to the application of the process for recovery by attachment and sale of movable and immovable properties, belonging to the tax-evader\nIt cannot be said that one proceeding is more general than the other, because there is much that is common between them, in so far as the mode of recovery is concerned.\nSection 19, in addition to recovery of the amount, gives the power to the Magistrate to convict and sentence the offender to fine or in default of payment of fine, to imprisonment", + "expert_4": "The State of Kerala and the Tahsildars of Kottayam and Kanjirappally Taluks are the appellants, and C.M. Francis Co., a partnership firm, is the first respondent, and the partners of the firm are the remaining respondents.\nThe respondents were doing business in hill produce like pepper, ginger, betelnuts etc., and were assessed to sales tax under the Travancore-Cochin General Sales Tax Act XI of 1125 (referred to as the Act), for the years 1950 to 1954.\nThe respondents have to pay a sum of Rs. 1,01,716-4-3 as tax.\nIn 1954, proceedings were started against them under s. 13 of the Act, which provides that if the tax is not paid as laid down in that section, the whole of the amount or such part thereof as remains due, may be recovered as if it were an arrears of land revenue.\nIt appears that the pro- ceedings were not fruitful, and a prosecution under s. 19 of the Act was instituted against the partners in the Court of the First Class Magistrate, Ponkunnam.\nRespondents 2 to 5 pleaded guilty, and the Magistrate passed an order on October 18, 1955 as follows The sentence or other final order A 1 to 4 sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 50/- each and in default to undergo S. 1. for one month each.\nA 1 to 4 admit that they failed to pay on demand by the competent authority, a sum of Rs. 1,01,716-4-3 due from them as sales tax for the years 1950 to 1954. This amount will be realised from A 1 to 4, jointly or severally, individually or collectively under the provisions of the Cr.P.C. for realisation of criminal fines, as if it were a fine imposed by this court on each accused individually and all of them together.\nThe authorities, however, started proceedings again under s. 13 of the Act read with the provisions of the Travancore- Cochin Revenue Recovery Act, 1951 (VII of 1951), to recover the amount as arrears of land revenue, and attached some properties belonging to the respondents within the jurisdiction of the second and third appellants, the Tahsildars of Kottayam and Kanjirappally Taluks.\nThe firm thereupon filed the petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution for a writ of prohibition or other order or direction to the effect that the proceedings for realisation of the arrears under the Revenue Recovery Act be quashed.\nThey, therefore, submitted that the procedure under s. 19 of the Act was no longer open, and could not be proceeded with.\nSection 19 of the Act, so far as it is material, reads as follows Any person who (b) fails to pay within the time allowed, any tax assessed on him under this Act, or (d)fraudulently evades the payment of any tax assessed on him shall on conviction by a Magistrate of the first class, be liable to a fine which may extend to one thousand rupees and in the case of a conviction under clause (b), (d) the Magistrate shall specify in the order the tax which the person convicted has failed or evaded to pay and the tax so specified shall be recoverable as if it were a fine under the Code of Criminal Procedure for the timebeing in force.\nIn dealing with the question, the learned Judges of the High Court felt that s. 13 of the Act was in the nature of a general law, over which the special procedure prescribed by s. 19 of the Act read with s. 386 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was to prevail.\nThe writ of prohibition was granted by the High Court.\nThe question which arises is whether s. 19 must be taken to prevail over s. 13 of the Act.\nBoth the sections lay down the mode for recovery of arrears of tax, and, as has already been noticed by the High Court, lead to the application of the process for recovery by attachment and sale of movable and immovable properties, belonging to the tax-evader.\nIt cannot be said that one proceeding is more general than the other, because there is much that is common between them, in so far as the mode of recovery is concerned.\nSection 19, in addition to recovery of the amount, gives the power to the Magistrate to convict and sentence the offender to fine or in default of payment of fine, to imprisonment.", + "expert_5": "(b) fails to pay within the time allowed, any tax assessed on him under this Act, or (d)fraudulently evades the payment of any tax assessed on him shall on conviction by a Magistrate of the first class, be liable to a fine which may extend to one thousand rupees and in the case of a conviction under clause (b), (d) the Magistrate shall specify in the order the tax which the person convicted has failed or evaded to pay and the tax so specified shall be recoverable as if it were a fine under the Code of Criminal Procedure for the timebeing in force.\nIn dealing with the question, the learned Judges of the High Court felt that s. 13 of the Act was in the nature of a general law, over which the special procedure prescribed by s. 19 of the Act read with s. 386 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was to prevail.\nThe respondents did not appear in this Court.\nBoth the sections lay down the mode for recovery of arrears of tax, and, as has already been noticed by the High Court, lead to the application of the process for recovery by attachment and sale of movable and immovable properties, belonging to the tax-evader.\nIt cannot be said that one proceeding is more general than the other, because there is much that is common between them, in so far as the mode of recovery is concerned.\nSection 19, in addition to recovery of the amount, gives the power to the Magistrate to convict and sentence the offender to fine or in default of payment of fine, to imprisonment." + }, + "1960_327": { + "expert_1": "The contractors in their turn used to employ a number of persons to carry out the work which they had taken on contract.\nIn this reference only three points were referred out of the four which were before the conciliation board, namely, those relating to bonus, festival holidays and payment of wages to these workmen at par with the workmen of the company. The fourth point which was raised before the conciliation board (namely, non-abolition of the contract system) was not referred.\nWhen the matter came up before the industrial court it framed a number of issues and the first and most important issue ran thus Are the workmen concerned employees of the P.\nThe main objection of the company was that the dispute, if any was between the contractors and their employees and that there was no dispute between the company and its workmen. It was further objected that there was no valid or legal order of the Government referring any dispute between the company and its workmen to the tribunal and therefore the tribunal had no jurisdiction. On the merits it was urged that the workmen concerned were not the workmen of the company and there was no relationship of employer and employee between the company and these workmen and therefore the company could not be regarded as a party to the dispute between the contractors and their workmen. It is therefore clear that the main question which was considered by the tribunal was whether the workmen concerned were the workmen of the company or of the contractors. As the tribunal itself says, the crux of the whole case was whether the workmen concerned were the employees of the company .\n The tribunal went into the evidence in this connection and came to the conclusion that these workmen were in fact and in reality the employees of the company.\nThe main contention on behalf of the company before us is that even assuming that the Government had power under s. 5 read with cl. 12 of G. O. No. U-464 (LL)XXXVI-B- 257(LL)/1954, dated July 14, 1954, to implied the company as a party, the main issue decided by the tribunal was not referred to it and the tribunal could only decide the three matters of dispute included in the order of reference of July 31, 1956.\nTherefore, in so far as the tribunal went beyond the, three matters of dispute specified in the reference and decided the question whether the workmen concerned were in the employ of the company or of the contractors it was acting without jurisdiction as this matter was never referred to it. We are of opinion that this contention must prevail.\nFurther before the conciliation board not only the contractors but the company was also a party, for obviously the question of non-abolition of the contract system would necessitate the presence of the company as a party to the proceedings.\n When however the Government referred the dispute to the tribunal on July 31, it did not include the fourth item which was before the conciliation board relating to the non-abolition of the contract system among the matters in dispute. It also did not include the company as one of the parties to the dispute, for the reference-order refers only to two parties to the dispute, namely, the contractors and their workmen. On such a reference there could be no jurisdiction in the tribunal to decide the question whether these workmen were the workmen of the company or of the contractors, for such a question was not referred to the tribunal. It is true that on August 13, 1956, the company was impleaded as a party to the dispute referred by the notification of July 31 but the matters in dispute remained unmended, and the question of non-abolition of the contract system or the question whether these workmen were the employees of the company in fact and in reality was not included in the matters of dispute by amendment under the proviso to s. 4 of the Act.", + "expert_2": "A dispute arose between the contractors and their workmen in 1956 and an application was made on June 6, 1956, by the workmen before the conciliation board.\nIn this reference only three points were referred out of the four which were before the conciliation board, namely, those relating to bonus, festival holidays and payment of wages to these workmen at par with the workmen of the company. The fourth point which was raised before the conciliation board (namely, non-abolition of the contract system) was not referred.\nThe main objection of the company was that the dispute, if any was between the contractors and their employees and that there was no dispute between the company and its workmen. It was further objected that there was no valid or legal order of the Government referring any dispute between the company and its workmen to the tribunal and therefore the tribunal had no jurisdiction.\nAs we have already pointed out, there were four matters before the conciliation board including the question of non-abolition of the contract system. Further before the conciliation board not only the contractors but the company was also a party, for obviously the question of non-abolition of the contract system would necessitate the presence of the company as a party to the proceedings.\n When however the Government referred the dispute to the tribunal on July 31, it did not include the fourth item which was before the conciliation board relating to the non-abolition of the contract system among the matters in dispute. It also did not include the company as one of the parties to the dispute, for the reference-order refers only to two parties to the dispute, namely, the contractors and their workmen. On such a reference there could be no jurisdiction in the tribunal to decide the question whether these workmen were the workmen of the company or of the contractors, for such a question was not referred to the tribunal.", + "expert_3": "The appellant is the U. P. Electric Supply Co. Ltd., Lucknow, (hereinafter called the company). It appears that the company used to employ Messrs. s M. Choudhary (hereinafter referred to as the contractors) as its contractors for doing certain work for it.\nThe contractors in their turn used to employ a number of persons to carry out the work which they had taken on contract\nA dispute arose between the contractors and their workmen in 1956 and an application was made on June 6, 1956, by the workmen before the conciliation board. To this application both the company as well as the contractors were parties and four matters were referred by the workmen to the conciliation board, namely, (i) non-grant of bonus for the years 1953-54 and 1954-55 (ii) nongrant of festival holidays (iii) non-fixation of minimum wages of these workmen at par with the workmen employed by the company and (iv) nonabolition of the contract system. Efforts at conciliation failed and thereupon the Government of Uttar Pradesh made a reference to the Industrial Tribunal under the U. P.\nIndustrial Disputes Act\nIn this reference only three points were referred out of the four which were before the conciliation board, namely, those relating to bonus, festival holidays and payment of wages to these workmen at par with the workmen of the company. The fourth point which was raised before the conciliation board (namely, non-abolition of the contract system) was not referred. The parties to this reference were two, namely-(i) the contractors and (ii) their workmen\nOn August 13, 1956, another notification was issued by the U. P. Government under ss. 3, 5 and 8 of the Act by which the company was impleaded as a party to the dispute referred by the notification of July 31, 1956\nWhen the matter came up before the industrial court it framed a number of issues and the first and most important issue ran thus Are the workmen concerned employees of the P. Electric Supply Co. Ltd., Lucknow or of Messrs. S. M. Chaudhary, contractors ?\nthe main question which was considered by the tribunal was whether the workmen concerned were the workmen of the company or of the contractors\nAs the tribunal itself says, the crux of the whole case was whether the workmen concerned were the employees of the company .\n The tribunal went into the evidence in this connection and came to the conclusion that these workmen were in fact and in reality the employees of the company\nThe main contention on behalf of the company before us is that even assuming that the Government had power under s. 5 read with cl. 12 of G. O. No. U-464 (LL)XXXVI-B- 257(LL)/1954, dated July 14, 1954, to implied the company as a party, the main issue decided by the tribunal was not referred to it and the tribunal could only decide the three matters of dispute included in the order of reference of July 31, 1956. Therefore, in so far as the tribunal went beyond the, three matters of dispute specified in the reference and decided the question whether the workmen concerned were in the employ of the company or of the contractors it was acting without jurisdiction as this matter was never referred to it.\nAs we have already pointed out, there were four matters before the conciliation board including the question of non-abolition of the contract system. Further before the conciliation board not only the contractors but the company was also a party, for obviously the question of non-abolition of the contract system would necessitate the presence of the company as a party to the proceedings\nWhen however the Government referred the dispute to the tribunal on July 31, it did not include the fourth item which was before the conciliation board relating to the non-abolition of the contract system among the matters in dispute. It also did not include the company as one of the parties to the dispute, for the reference-order refers only to two parties to the dispute, namely, the contractors and their workmen.\nOn such a reference there could be no jurisdiction in the tribunal to decide the question whether these workmen were the workmen of the company or of the contractors, for such a question was not referred to the tribunal.\nIt is true that on August 13, 1956, the company was impleaded as a party to the dispute referred by the notification of July 31 but the matters in dispute remained unmended, and the question of non-abolition of the contract system or the question whether these workmen were the employees of the company in fact and in reality was not included in the matters of dispute by amendment under the proviso to s. 4 of the Act", + "expert_4": "The appellant is the U. P. Electric Supply Co. Ltd., Lucknow, (hereinafter called the company).\nthe company used to employ Messrs. s M. Choudhary (hereinafter referred to as the contractors) as its contractors for doing certain work for it.\nThe contractors in their turn used to employ a number of persons to carry out the work which they had taken on contract.\nA dispute arose between the contractors and their workmen in 1956 and an application was made on June 6, 1956, by the workmen before the conciliation board.\nTo this application both the company as well as the contractors were parties and four matters were referred by the workmen to the conciliation board, namely, (i) non-grant of bonus for the years 1953-54 and 1954-55 (ii) nongrant of festival holidays (iii) non-fixation of minimum wages of these workmen at par with the workmen employed by the company and (iv) nonabolition of the contract system.\nEfforts at conciliation failed and thereupon the Government of Uttar Pradesh made a reference to the Industrial Tribunal under the U. P. Industrial Disputes Act, No.\nXXVIII of 1947, (hereinafter called the Act).\nWhen the matter came up before the industrial court it framed a number of issues and the first and most important issue ran thus Are the workmen concerned employees of the P. Electric Supply Co. Ltd., Lucknow or of Messrs.\nS.\nM. Chaudhary, contractors ?\nThe main objection of the company was that the dispute, if any was between the contractors and their employees and that there was no dispute between the company and its workmen.\nThe tribunal went into the evidence in this connection and came to the conclusion that these workmen were in fact and in reality the employees of the company.\nThe main contention on behalf of the company before us is that even assuming that the Government had power under s. 5 read with cl. 12 of G. O. No.\nU-464 (LL)XXXVI-B- 257(LL)/1954, dated July 14, 1954, to implied the company as a party, the main issue decided by the tribunal was not referred to it and the tribunal could only decide the three matters of dispute included in the order of reference of July 31, 1956.\nTherefore, in so far as the tribunal went beyond the, three matters of dispute specified in the reference and decided the question whether the workmen concerned were in the employ of the company or of the contractors it was acting without jurisdiction as this matter was never referred to it.\nWe are of opinion that this contention must prevail.\nAs we have already pointed out, there were four matters before the conciliation board including the question of non-abolition of the contract system.\nFurther before the conciliation board not only the contractors but the company was also a party, for obviously the question of non-abolition of the contract system would necessitate the presence of the company as a party to the proceedings.\nWhen however the Government referred the dispute to the tribunal on July 31, it did not include the fourth item which was before the conciliation board relating to the non-abolition of the contract system among the matters in dispute. It also did not include the company as one of the parties to the dispute, for the reference-order refers only to two parties to the dispute, namely, the contractors and their workmen.\nOn such a reference there could be no jurisdiction in the tribunal to decide the question whether these workmen were the workmen of the company or of the contractors, for such a question was not referred to the tribunal.\nIt is true that on August 13, 1956, the company was impleaded as a party to the dispute referred by the notification of July 31 but the matters in dispute remained unmended, and the question of non-abolition of the contract system or the question whether these workmen were the employees of the company in fact and in reality was not included in the matters of dispute by amendment under the proviso to s. 4 of the Act", + "expert_5": "The fourth point which was raised before the conciliation board (namely, non-abolition of the contract system) was not referred.\nThe appellant was not a party to this reference.\nOn August 13, 1956, another notification was issued by the U. P. Government under ss. 3, 5 and 8 of the Act by which the company was impleaded as a party to the dispute referred by the notification of July 31, 1956.\nThe main contention on behalf of the company before us is that even assuming that the Government had power under s. 5 read with cl. 12 of G. O. No. U-464 (LL)XXXVI-B- 257(LL)/1954, dated July 14, 1954, to implied the company as a party, the main issue decided by the tribunal was not referred to it and the tribunal could only decide the three matters of dispute included in the order of reference of July 31, 1956. Therefore, in so far as the tribunal went beyond the, three matters of dispute specified in the reference and decided the question whether the workmen concerned were in the employ of the company or of the contractors it was acting without jurisdiction as this matter was never referred to it.\nWe are of opinion that this contention must prevail.\nbefore the conciliation board not only the contractors but the company was also a party, for obviously the question of non-abolition of the contract system would necessitate the presence of the company as a party to the proceedings.\nWhen however the Government referred the dispute to the tribunal on July 31, it did not include the fourth item which was before the conciliation board relating to the non-abolition of the contract system among the matters in dispute. It also did not include the company as one of the parties to the dispute, for the reference-order refers only to two parties to the dispute, namely, the contractors and their workmen.\nOn such a reference there could be no jurisdiction in the tribunal to decide the question whether these workmen were the workmen of the company or of the contractors, for such a question was not referred to the tribunal.\nIt is true that on August 13, 1956, the company was impleaded as a party to the dispute referred by the notification of July 31 but the matters in dispute remained unmended, and the question of non-abolition of the contract system or the question whether these workmen were the employees of the company in fact and in reality was not included in the matters of dispute by amendment under the proviso to s. 4 of the Act." + }, + "1960_44": { + "expert_1": "These appeals are directed against three judgments and orders of the Punjab High Court in three Civil Revisions Nos. 166-D, 167-D and 168-D which were brought by the appellants against three of their tenants under s. 35 of the Delhi Ajmer Rent Control Act (XXXVIII of 1952), hereinafter termed the Act.\nThe High Court held that the compromise did not comprise any matter which was not the subject matter of the suit that the respondents could enforce the terms of the decree in the proceedings which they took, i. e., under s. 15 of the Act that time was not of the essence of the compromise and therefore of the decree and consequently in spite of the possession of the premises having been given by the respondents after the date specified in the decree, i. e., March 4, 1953, the respondents were entitled to enforce the decree by execution and apply for possession being restored to them at any rate they could apply for restitution under the inherent powers of the Court.\n Thus the High Court was of the opinion that though s. 15(2) of the Act was not applicable to the proceedings they could be treated as Execution proceedings. Against this judgment and order the appellants have come in appeal to this court by special leave.\nThe compromise, the order and the decree provided (1) that the respondents will vacate their respective shops on March 4, 1953, and hand over possession to the appellants (2) they elected to get back possession after rebuilding,which the appellants agreed to hand back on September 4, 1953 (3) the rent after such possession was to be determined by the court.\nIt was contended on behalf of the appellants that the above facts taken with the circumstances that the decree was passed in a suit under s. 13(1), proviso (g), show that this was an order passed and a decree made in accordance with the terms of s. 15 of the Act.\nIn our opinion the contentions raised by the appellants are well founded and the appellants must succeed.\nThe suits for eviction were brought within the framework of the Act and were based on the provisions of s. 13, proviso (g). No eviction would have been possible excepting when conditions laid down in s. 13 were satisfied. The decrees which were passed were substantially in accordance with the provisions of s. 15 of the Act and as was contended by the appellants they were decrees under which the premises had to be vacated by the respondents on a specified day. Under that section they had the right to elect and did elect to get possession after rebuilding this possession was to be given by the landlords to the tenants within a reasonable time and six months period was fixed by Consent between the parties and the rent, if the respondents were not put into possession on the same terms as before, was to be settled by court and that is what was done under the terms of the consent decree. The applications for being put into possession which were filed by the respondents were really under s. 15(3) of the Act.\n As the respondents did not deli- ver possession to the appellants on or before the dates specified in the decree the provisions of s. 15 contained in sub-s. (3) of that Act were not available to them and they were ,not entitled to be put into possession as prayed by them.", + "expert_2": "These appeals are directed against three judgments and orders of the Punjab High Court in three Civil Revisions Nos. 166-D, 167-D and 168-D which were brought by the appellants against three of their tenants under s. 35 of the Delhi Ajmer Rent Control Act (XXXVIII of 1952), hereinafter termed the Act. The appellants in all the three appeals are the landlords and the respondents in the three appeals are three different tenants. The appellants filed three separate suits for the eviction of their three tenants under cl. (g) of proviso to s. 13(1) of the Act on the ground that the premises were bona fide required for purposes of rebuilding.\nThereupon the court passed the following order and a decree followed thereon- In terms of the statements of the plaintiff., defendant and counsel for defendants a decree for Rs. 82/8/- on account of rent in suit be passed in favour of the plaintiff against the defendants. Also decree for ejectment be passed in respect of the shop in suit in favour of the plaintiff against the defendants and that the defendants do give possession of the shop in suit by 4-3-53 to the plaintiff and that the plaintiff after constructing it afresh within six months from 4-3-53 give it to the defendants.\nThe decrees passed were on the basis that the premises were required by the landlord for rebuilding which falls under s. 13 and the decrees also incorporated the requirements of s. 15 which provides- The Court shall, when passing any decree or order on the grounds specified in clause (f) or clause (g) of the proviso to sub. section (1) of section 13 ascertain from the tenant whether he elects to be placed in occupation of the premises or part thereof from which he is to be evicted and if, the tenant so elects, shall record the fact of the election in the decree or order and specify therein the date on or before which he shall deliver possession so as to enable the landlord to commence the work of repairs or building or rebuilding, as the case may be. If the tenant delivers possession on or before the date specified in the decree or order, the landlord shall, on the completion of the work of repairs or building or rebuilding place the tenant in occupation of the premises or part thereof.\n If, after the tenant has delivered possession on or before the date specified in the decree or order the landlord fails to commence the work of repairs or building or rebuilding within one month of the specified date or fails to complete the work in a reasonable time or having completed the work, fails to place the tenant in occupation of the premises in accordance with sub-section (2), the Court may, on the application of the tenant made within one year from the specified date, order the landlord to place the tenant in occupation of the premises or part thereof on the original terms and conditions or to pay to such tenant such compensation as may be fixed by the Court. The compromise, the order and the decree provided (1) that the respondents will vacate their respective shops on March 4, 1953, and hand over possession to the appellants (2) they elected to get back possession after rebuilding,which the appellants agreed to hand back on September 4, 1953 (3) the rent after such possession was to be determined by the court.\nIt was submitted that although the time for giving delivery to the appellants was fixed in the compromise it was not of the essence of the contract. In our opinion the contentions raised by the appellants are well founded and the appellants must succeed.\nThe decrees which were passed were substantially in accordance with the provisions of s. 15 of the Act and as was contended by the appellants they were decrees under which the premises had to be vacated by the respondents on a specified day. Under that section they had the right to elect and did elect to get possession after rebuilding this possession was to be given by the landlords to the tenants within a reasonable time and six months period was fixed by Consent between the parties and the rent, if the respondents were not put into possession on the same terms as before, was to be settled by court and that is what was done under the terms of the consent decree. The applications for being put into possession which were filed by the respondents were really under s. 15(3) of the Act.\nAs the respondents did not deli- ver possession to the appellants on or before the dates specified in the decree the provisions of s. 15 contained in sub-s. (3) of that Act were not available to them and they were ,not entitled to be put into possession as prayed by them.", + "expert_3": "These appeals are directed against three judgments and orders of the Punjab High Court in three Civil Revisions Nos. 166-D, 167-D and 168-D which were brought by the appellants against three of their tenants under s. 35 of the Delhi Ajmer Rent Control Act (XXXVIII of 1952), hereinafter termed the Act. The appellants in all the three appeals are the landlords and the respondents in the three appeals are three different tenants. The appellants filed three separate suits for the eviction of their three tenants under cl. (g) of proviso to s. 13(1) of the Act on the ground that the premises were bona fide required for purposes of rebuilding.\nOn February 27, 1953, the parties in all the three suits entered into a compromise in the following terms We have compromised the case with the plaintiff. A decree may be passed for Rs. 82/8/- on account of rent in suit and for ejectment in respect of the shop in suit in favour of the plaintiff against the defendants The defendants will vacate the shop by 4-3-53 and hand over possession to the plaintiff and the plaintiff will hand over its possession again (second time) to the defendants within six months from 4-3-53 after constructing it afresh.\n We shall pay such rent as this court will fix\nThereupon the court passed the following order and a decree followed thereon- In terms of the statements of the plaintiff., defendant and counsel for defendants a decree for Rs. 82/8/- on account of rent in suit be passed in favour of the plaintiff against the defendants. Also decree for ejectment be passed in respect of the shop in suit in favour of the plaintiff against the defendants and that the defendants do give possession of the shop in suit by 4-3-53 to the plaintiff and that the plaintiff after constructing it afresh within six months from 4-3-53 give it to the defendants. From out of the money deposited, a sum of Rs. 82/8/- be paid to the plaintiff and the balance returned to the defendants\nAccording to the decree the possession was to be given to the appellants on March 4, 1953, but it was actually delivered by the three respondents between March 7 and 15, 1953. On the completion of the building the three respondents filed three separate applications under s. 15 of the Act for their being put into possession. These applications were filed on October 7, 1953\nThe High Court held that the compromise did not comprise any matter which was not the subject matter of the suit that the respondents could enforce the terms of the decree in the proceedings which they took, i. e., under s. 15 of the Act that time was not of the essence of the compromise and therefore of the decree and consequently in spite of the possession of the premises having been given by the respondents after the date specified in the decree, i. e., March 4, 1953, the respondents were entitled to enforce the decree by execution and apply for possession being restored to them at any rate they could apply for restitution under the inherent powers of the Court.\n Thus the High Court was of the opinion that though s. 15(2) of the Act was not applicable to the proceedings they could be treated as Execution proceedings\nAgainst this judgment and order the appellants have come in appeal to this court by special leave.\nUnder s. 13 of the Act the respondents are protected against eviction excepting for the reasons given in the proviso. The appellants had filed the original suits for eviction under s. 13, proviso (g), which was as under Section 13- Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in any other law or any contract, no decree or order for the recovery of possession of any premises shall be passed by any court in favour of the landlord against any tenant including a tenant whose tenancy is terminated) Provided that nothing in this sub-section shall apply to any suit or other proceeding for such recovery of possession if the Court is satisfied- (g) that the premises are bona fide required by the landlord for the purpose of rebuilding the premises or for the replacement of the premises by any building or for the erection of other building and that such building or rebuilding cannot be carried out without the premises being vacated . Thus when the suits were brought the provisions of the Act were invoked. The decrees passed were on the basis that the premises were required by the landlord for rebuilding which falls under s. 13 and the decrees also incorporated the requirements of s. 15 which provides- The Court shall, when passing any decree or order on the grounds specified in clause (f) or clause (g) of the proviso to sub. section (1) of section 13 ascertain from the tenant whether he elects to be placed in occupation of the premises or part thereof from which he is to be evicted and if, the tenant so elects, shall record the fact of the election in the decree or order and specify therein the date on or before which he shall deliver possession so as to enable the landlord to commence the work of repairs or building or rebuilding, as the case may be.\nIf the tenant delivers possession on or before the date specified in the decree or order, the landlord shall, on the completion of the work of repairs or building or rebuilding place the tenant in occupation of the premises or part thereof\nIf, after the tenant has delivered possession on or before the date specified in the decree or order the landlord fails to commence the work of repairs or building or rebuilding within one month of the specified date or fails to complete the work in a reasonable time or having completed the work, fails to place the tenant in occupation of the premises in accordance with sub-section (2), the Court may, on the application of the tenant made within one year from the specified date, order the landlord to place the tenant in occupation of the premises or part thereof on the original terms and conditions or to pay to such tenant such compensation as may be fixed by the Court.\nThe compromise, the order and the decree provided (1) that the respondents will vacate their respective shops on March 4, 1953, and hand over possession to the appellants (2) they elected to get back possession after rebuilding,which the appellants agreed to hand back on September 4, 1953 (3) the rent after such possession was to be determined by the court\nIt was contended on behalf of the appellants that the above facts taken with the circumstances that the decree was passed in a suit under s. 13(1), proviso (g), show that this was an order passed and a decree made in accordance with the terms of s. 15 of the Act. It is significant that the respondents themselves made the applications to the court under s. 15 of the Act.\nIn our opinion the contentions raised by the appellants are well founded and the appellants must succeed\nThe suits for eviction were brought within the framework of the Act and were based on the provisions of s. 13, proviso (g). No eviction would have been possible excepting when conditions laid down in s. 13 were satisfied. The decrees which were passed were substantially in accordance with the provisions of s. 15 of the Act and as was contended by the appellants they were decrees under which the premises had to be vacated by the respondents on a specified day. Under that section they had the right to elect and did elect to get possession after rebuilding this possession was to be given by the landlords to the tenants within a reasonable time and six months period was fixed by Consent between the parties and the rent, if the respondents were not put into possession on the same terms as before, was to be settled by court and that is what was done under the terms of the consent decree.\nThe applications for being put into possession which were filed by the respondents were really under s. 15(3) of the Act\nAs the respondents did not deli- ver possession to the appellants on or before the dates specified in the decree the provisions of s. 15 contained in sub-s. (3) of that Act were not available to them and they were ,not entitled to be put into possession as prayed by them", + "expert_4": "These appeals are directed against three judgments and orders of the Punjab High Court in three Civil Revisions Nos. 166-D, 167-D and 168-D which were brought by the appellants against three of their tenants under s. 35 of the Delhi Ajmer Rent Control Act (XXXVIII of 1952), hereinafter termed the Act.\nThe appellants in all the three appeals are the landlords and the respondents in the three appeals are three different tenants.\nThe appellants filed three separate suits for the eviction of their three tenants under cl. (g) of proviso to s. 13(1) of the Act on the ground that the premises were bona fide required for purposes of rebuilding.\nOn February 27, 1953, the parties in all the three suits entered into a compromise\nThereupon the court passed the following order and a decree followed thereon- In terms of the statements of the plaintiff., defendant and counsel for defendants a decree for Rs. 82/8/- on account of rent in suit be passed in favour of the plaintiff against the defendants.\nAlso decree for ejectment be passed in respect of the shop in suit in favour of the plaintiff against the defendants and that the defendants do give possession of the shop in suit by 4-3-53 to the plaintiff and that the plaintiff after constructing it afresh within six months from 4-3-53 give it to the defendants.\nOn the completion of the building the three respondents filed three separate applications under s. 15 of the Act for their being put into possession.\nThe High Court held that the compromise did not comprise any matter which was not the subject matter of the suit that the respondents could enforce the terms of the decree in the proceedings which they took, i. e., under s. 15 of the Act that time was not of the essence of the compromise and therefore of the decree and consequently in spite of the possession of the premises having been given by the respondents after the date specified in the decree, i. e., March 4, 1953, the respondents were entitled to enforce the decree by execution and apply for possession being restored to them at any rate they could apply for restitution under the inherent powers of the Court.\nThus the High Court was of the opinion that though s. 15(2) of the Act was not applicable to the proceedings they could be treated as Execution proceedings.\nAgainst this judgment and order the appellants have come in appeal to this court by special leave.\nUnder s. 13 of the Act the respondents are protected against eviction excepting for the reasons given in the proviso.\nThe appellants had filed the original suits for eviction under s. 13, proviso (g), which was as under Section 13- Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in any other law or any contract, no decree or order for the recovery of possession of any premises shall be passed by any court in favour of the landlord against any tenant including a tenant whose tenancy is terminated) Provided that nothing in this sub-section shall apply to any suit or other proceeding for such recovery of possession if the Court is satisfied- (g) that the premises are bona fide required by the landlord for the purpose of rebuilding the premises or for the replacement of the premises by any building or for the erection of other building and that such building or rebuilding cannot be carried out without the premises being vacated .\nThus when the suits were brought the provisions of the Act were invoked.\nThe decrees passed were on the basis that the premises were required by the landlord for rebuilding which falls under s. 13 and the decrees also incorporated the requirements of s. 15 which provides- The Court shall, when passing any decree or order on the grounds specified in clause (f) or clause (g) of the proviso to sub. section (1) of section 13 ascertain from the tenant whether he elects to be placed in occupation of the premises or part thereof from which he is to be evicted and if, the tenant so elects, shall record the fact of the election in the decree or order and specify therein the date on or before which he shall deliver possession so as to enable the landlord to commence the work of repairs or building or rebuilding, as the case may be.\nIf the tenant delivers possession on or before the date specified in the decree or order, the landlord shall, on the completion of the work of repairs or building or rebuilding place the tenant in occupation of the premises or part thereof.\nIf, after the tenant has delivered possession on or before the date specified in the decree or order the landlord fails to commence the work of repairs or building or rebuilding within one month of the specified date or fails to complete the work in a reasonable time or having completed the work, fails to place the tenant in occupation of the premises in accordance with sub-section (2), the Court may, on the application of the tenant made within one year from the specified date, order the landlord to place the tenant in occupation of the premises or part thereof on the original terms and conditions or to pay to such tenant such compensation as may be fixed by the Court.\nThe compromise, the order and the decree provided (1) that the respondents will vacate their respective shops on March 4, 1953, and hand over possession to the appellants (2) they elected to get back possession after rebuilding,which the appellants agreed to hand back on September 4, 1953 (3) the rent after such possession was to be determined by the court.\nIt was contended on behalf of the appellants that the above facts taken with the circumstances that the decree was passed in a suit under s. 13(1), proviso (g), show that this was an order passed and a decree made in accordance with the terms of s. 15 of the Act.\nFor the respondents it was argued that the decree was not one under s. 15 of the Act because the decree was based on a compromise whereby the parties fixed the date of delivery of possession to the appellants fixed the date for completion of the rebuilding and agreed between themselves as to repossession by the respondents.\nIt was submitted that although the time for giving delivery to the appellants was fixed in the compromise it was not of the essence of the contract.\nIn our opinion the contentions raised by the appellants are well founded and the appellants must succeed.\nThe suits for eviction were brought within the framework of the Act and were based on the provisions of s. 13, proviso (g). No eviction would have been possible excepting when conditions laid down in s. 13 were satisfied. The decrees which were passed were substantially in accordance with the provisions of s. 15 of the Act and as was contended by the appellants they were decrees under which the premises had to be vacated by the respondents on a specified day.\nUnder that section they had the right to elect and did elect to get possession after rebuilding this possession was to be given by the landlords to the tenants within a reasonable time and six months period was fixed by Consent between the parties and the rent, if the respondents were not put into possession on the same terms as before, was to be settled by court and that is what was done under the terms of the consent decree.\nThe applications for being put into possession which were filed by the respondents were really under s. 15(3) of the Act.\nAs the respondents did not deli- ver possession to the appellants on or before the dates specified in the decree the provisions of s. 15 contained in sub-s. (3) of that Act were not available to them and they were ,not entitled to be put into possession as prayed by them.\nIt was argued that the appellants had taken possession of the premises after the specified date without protest and had even accepted rent upto then and were therefore estopped from raising that defence.", + "expert_5": "The defendants will vacate the shop by 4-3-53 and hand over possession to the plaintiff\nthe defendants do give possession of the shop in suit by 4-3-53 to the plaintiff\nAccording to the decree the possession was to be given to the appellants on March 4, 1953, but it was actually delivered by the three respondents between March 7 and 15, 1953.\nNotwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in any other law or any contract, no decree or order for the recovery of possession of any premises shall be passed by any court in favour of the landlord against any tenant including a tenant whose tenancy is terminated) Provided that nothing in this sub-section shall apply to any suit or other proceeding for such recovery of possession if the Court is satisfied- (g) that the premises are bona fide required by the landlord for the purpose of rebuilding the premises or for the replacement of the premises by any building or for the erection of other building and that such building or rebuilding cannot be carried out without the premises being vacated .\nThe Court shall, when passing any decree or order on the grounds specified in clause (f) or clause (g) of the proviso to sub. section (1) of section 13 ascertain from the tenant whether he elects to be placed in occupation of the premises or part thereof from which he is to be evicted and if, the tenant so elects, shall record the fact of the election in the decree or order and specify therein the date on or before which he shall deliver possession so as to enable the landlord to commence the work of repairs or building or rebuilding, as the case may be.\nIf the tenant delivers possession on or before the date specified in the decree or order, the landlord shall, on the completion of the work of repairs or building or rebuilding place the tenant in occupation of the premises or part thereof.\nIf, after the tenant has delivered possession on or before the date specified in the decree or order the landlord fails to commence the work of repairs or building or rebuilding within one month of the specified date or fails to complete the work in a reasonable time or having completed the work, fails to place the tenant in occupation of the premises in accordance with sub-section (2), the Court may, on the application of the tenant made within one year from the specified date, order the landlord to place the tenant in occupation of the premises or part thereof on the original terms and conditions or to pay to such tenant such compensation as may be fixed by the Court.\nThe decrees which were passed were substantially in accordance with the provisions of s. 15 of the Act\nthey were decrees under which the premises had to be vacated by the respondents on a specified day.\nThe applications for being put into possession which were filed by the respondents were really under s. 15(3) of the Act.\nAs the respondents did not deli- ver possession to the appellants on or before the dates specified in the decree the provisions of s. 15 contained in sub-s. (3) of that Act were not available to them and they were ,not entitled to be put into possession as prayed by them." + }, + "1960_72": { + "expert_1": "The short question of law which falls to be decided in the present appeal is whether a dispute raised by the employees of a General Insurance Company against their employer for payment of bonus in any particular year can be referred for adjudication by an Industrial Tribunal under S. 10(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (XIV of 1947).\nOn April 11, 1957, the Central Government referred the appellants claim for bonus for the years 1954 and 1955 for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Dhanbad, constituted under s. 7A of the Industrial Disputes Act, and this reference has been made under S. 10(1)(d) of the Act. Before the Tribunal the respondent urged a preliminary objection against the validity of the reference itself. Its case was that the payment of bonus by an Insurance Company is conditioned entirely by the relevant provisions of the Insurance Act, 1938 (IV of 1938), and that the said provisions did not justify the reference of a dispute in that behalf for adjudication by any Industrial Tribunal. This preliminary objection was based on the provisions of S. 31A(1) and proviso (vii) of the Insurance Act.\n It was also urged by the respondent that having regard to the limitations imposed on the General Insurance Companies by s. 40C of the Insurance Act the claim for bonus made by the appellants, could not be sustained. The Tribunal has upheld the preliminary objection thus raised by the respondent and held that the reference is invalid. Incidentally it has also considered the plea raised under s. 40C and has observed that the said plea is also well founded In the result the Tribunal refused to entertain the reference and dismissed it accordingly. It is against this order of the Tribunal that the appellants have come to this Court by special leave.\nIt is common ground that the respondent has paid the appellants bonus equivalent to two months basic wages for each of the two years 1954 and 1955. The appellants claim two months basic wages as additional bonus for each of the two years under reference. It is their case that if the trading profits made by the respondent are ascertained from the respondents balance sheet and the Full Bench formula is applied, it would appear that the respondent has in its hands a substantial amount of available surplus from which the additional bonus claimed by them can be awarded. Since the reference has been rejected on the preliminary ground the Tribunal has naturally not considered this aspect of the problem.\nThus looking s. at 31A(1)(c) by itself without the proviso the position is absolutely at clear.\n The respondent cannot be directed to employ the appellants in any capacity so as to include in their remuneration a liability to pay bonus in respect of the general insurance business of the respondent. Bonus under the Industrial Disputes Act is not a part of wages, but the right to claim bonus which has been universally recognised by industrial adjudication in cases of employment falling under the said Act has now attained the status of a legal right. Bonus can be claimed as a matter of right provided of course by the application of the Full Bench formula it is shown that for the relevant year the employer has sufficient available surplus in hand. Therefore a claim for bonus made by the appellants in the present proceedings is a claim in respect of the general insurance business of the respondent, and if allowed it would add to the remuneration payable to them. In other words, bonus claimed by the appellants, if awarded, would, for the purpose of s. 31A (1)(c), be a part of their remuneration, and that is precisely what is prohibited by the said provision.\nThis provision which constitutes an exception to the rule prescribed by s. 31A(1)(c) allows the payment of bonus to the employees of Insurance Companies subject to the condition specified by it. Bonus intended to be paid to such employees must not exceed in amount the equivalent of their salary for a period which the Central Government regards as reasonable. The result of this provision appears to be that the Central Government has to consider the circumstances of each insurer and then decide whether any bonus should be paid by the insurer to its employees.\n If the financial position of the insurer is sufficiently satisfactory, the Central Government may decide to allow the insurer to pay bonus to its employees, and in that context the Central Government would prescribe the maximum within which the payment should be made. In no case can payment exceed the maximum prescribed by the Central Government, and in all cases the matter has to be considered by the Central Government and no other authority. Having regard to the scheme of the Act which purports to supervise and regulate the working of Insurance Companies the legislature thought that the payment of bonus by the Insurance Companies to their employees should normally be prohibited and its payment should be permitted subject to the over-riding control of the Central Government to prescribe the maximum in that behalf. If the Central Government decides that no bonus should be paid, no bonus can be paid by the insurer. If the Central Government decides that bonus should be paid but not beyond specified limit the insurer cannot exceed that limit. That, in our opinion, is the effect of proviso (vii) to s. 31A(1).\n It is, however, urged that proviso (vii) merely enables the Central Government to prescribe the maximum. It does not take away the Central Governments authority to refer an industrial dispute in respect of bonus for adjudication under s. 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act.\nThat is why the appellants contend that the enabling provision contained in proviso (vii) should not be construed to constitute a bar against the Central Governments power to act under s. 10(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act. We are not impressed by this argument. In our opinion the policy of the relevant clause of the proviso is absolutely clear. Payment of bonus by insurers was intended by the legislature to be conditioned by the provisions contained in the said clause, and we feel no doubt or difficulty in reaching the conclusion that the intervention of the Industrial Tribunals was intended to be excluded and the matter was intended to be kept within the discretion of the Central Government so far as the payment of bonus by the insurers is concerned.\n Then, as to the argument that the Government directive issued under proviso (vii) may not be obeyed by any insurer, we do not think that such an event is likely to happen but theoretically it is conceivable that an insurer may refuse to comply with the decision of the Government. In that case all we can say is that there is a lacuna left and the legislature may consider whether it is necessary to provide adequate remedy for making the Government decision binding and final. Having regard to the unqualified and absolute prohibition contained in s. 31A(1)(c) it seems to us difficult to hold that the payment of bonus to the employees of Insurance Companies is not absolutely conditioned by proviso (vii). In the absence of the said provision no bonus could have been claimed by Insurance employees, and so the effect of the said provision must be to limit the said right to the conditions prescribed by it. That is why we think that the Tribunal was right in coming to the conclusion that the reference made by the Central Government is invalid.\nThe fact that the Central Government took the view that it could make such a reference 1001 is hardly relevant in determining the scope and effect of the relevant provisions of the Act. This question must be considered on what we regard to be the fair construction of the relevant statutory provision, and as we have just indicated the construction of the relevant provision clearly supports the view taken by the Tribunal.\n Incidentally, it may be pointed out that in its award the Tribunal has referred to several other decisions of Industrial Tribunals which have taken the same view though there are one or two decisions which have upheld the validity of the reference without duly considering the effect of s. 31A(1).\nThe said section, according to that decision, prohibited the grant of industrial bonus to bank employees inasmuch as such bonus is remuneration which takes the form of a share in the profits of a banking company.\nbonus in the industrial sense as understood in our country does come out of the available surplus gap, wholly or in the actual wage. id it fills the wage and age in that sense, whether it be called contingent or supplementary.", + "expert_2": "The short question of law which falls to be decided in the present appeal is whether a dispute raised by the employees of a General Insurance Company against their employer for payment of bonus in any particular year can be referred for adjudication by an Industrial Tribunal under S. 10(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (XIV of 1947).\nIts case was that the payment of bonus by an Insurance Company is conditioned entirely by the relevant provisions of the Insurance Act, 1938 (IV of 1938), and that the said provisions did not justify the reference of a dispute in that behalf for adjudication by any Industrial Tribunal.\nThis preliminary objection was based on the provisions of S. 31A(1) and proviso (vii) of the Insurance Act.\nThe appellants claim two months basic wages as additional bonus for each of the two years under reference.\nThus looking s. at 31A(1)(c) by itself without the proviso the position is absolutely at clear.\n The respondent cannot be directed to employ the appellants in any capacity so as to include in their remuneration a liability to pay bonus in respect of the general insurance business of the respondent.\nThis provision which constitutes an exception to the rule prescribed by s. 31A(1)(c) allows the payment of bonus to the employees of Insurance Companies subject to the condition specified by it. Bonus intended to be paid to such employees must not exceed in amount the equivalent of their salary for a period which the Central Government regards as reasonable. The result of this provision appears to be that the Central Government has to consider the circumstances of each insurer and then decide whether any bonus should be paid by the insurer to its employees.\n If the financial position of the insurer is sufficiently satisfactory, the Central Government may decide to allow the insurer to pay bonus to its employees, and in that context the Central Government would prescribe the maximum within which the payment should be made.\nhowever, urged that proviso (vii) merely enables the Central Government to prescribe the maximum. It does not take away the Central Governments authority to refer an industrial dispute in respect of bonus for adjudication under s. 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act.\nPayment of bonus by insurers was intended by the legislature to be conditioned by the provisions contained in the said clause, and we feel no doubt or difficulty in reaching the conclusion that the intervention of the Industrial Tribunals was intended to be excluded and the matter was intended to be kept within the discretion of the Central Government so far as the payment of bonus by the insurers is concerned\nThen, as to the argument that the Government directive issued under proviso (vii) may not be obeyed by any insurer, we do not think that such an event is likely to happen but theoretically it is conceivable that an insurer may refuse to comply with the decision of the Government. In that case all we can say is that there is a lacuna left and the legislature may consider whether it is necessary to provide adequate remedy for making the Government decision binding and final.\nThat is why we think that the Tribunal was right in coming to the conclusion that the reference made by the Central Government is invalid.\nThe Central Bank of India v. Their Workmen (1), where a similar question has been considered. In that case the Court had to consider the effect of s. 10 of the Banking Companies Act, 1949, prior to its amendment in 1956. The said section, according to that decision, prohibited the grant of industrial bonus to bank employees inasmuch as such bonus is remuneration which takes the form of a share in the profits of a banking company. In dealing with the character of bonus in relation to remuneration specified by s. 10, S. \n Das, J., who spoke for the Court, observed that bonus in the industrial sense as understood in our country does come out of the available surplus gap, wholly or in the actual wage. id it fills the wage and age in that sense, whether it be called contingent or supplementary.", + "expert_3": "The short question of law which falls to be decided in the present appeal is whether a dispute raised by the employees of a General Insurance Company against their employer for payment of bonus in any particular year can be referred for adjudication by an Industrial Tribunal under S. 10(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947\nOn April 11, 1957, the Central Government referred the appellants claim for bonus for the years 1954 and 1955 for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Dhanbad, constituted under s. 7A of the Industrial Disputes Act, and this reference has been made under S. 10(1)(d) of the Act.\nBefore the Tribunal the respondent urged a preliminary objection against the validity of the reference itself. Its case was that the payment of bonus by an Insurance Company is conditioned entirely by the relevant provisions of the Insurance Act, 1938 (IV of 1938), and that the said provisions did not justify the reference of a dispute in that behalf for adjudication by any Industrial Tribunal. This preliminary objection was based on the provisions of S. 31A(1) and proviso (vii) of the Insurance Act\nIt was also urged by the respondent that having regard to the limitations imposed on the General Insurance Companies by s. 40C of the Insurance Act the claim for bonus made by the appellants, could not be sustained\nThe Tribunal has upheld the preliminary objection thus raised by the respondent and held that the reference is invalid. Incidentally it has also considered the plea raised under s. 40C and has observed that the said plea is also well founded In the result the Tribunal refused to entertain the reference and dismissed it accordingly. It is against this order of the Tribunal that the appellants have come to this Court by special leave\nThe appellants claim two months basic wages as additional bonus for each of the two years under reference. It is their case that if the trading profits made by the respondent are ascertained from the respondents balance sheet and the Full Bench formula is applied, it would appear that the respondent has in its hands a substantial amount of available surplus from which the additional bonus claimed by them can be awarded\nSince the reference has been rejected on the preliminary ground the Tribunal has naturally not considered this aspect of the problem\nThe preliminary objection raised by the respondent is founded on the relevant provisions of s. 31A of the Insurance Act (hereafter called the Act) and so we must now turn to the said provisions\nSection 31A(1)(c) of the Act provides, inter alia, that notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Indian Companies Act, 1913, or in the articles of association of the insurer, if a company, or in any contract or agreement, no insurer shall after the expiry of one year from the commencement of the Insurance (Amendment) Act, 1950, be directed or managed by, or employ as manager or officer or in any capacity, any person whose remuneration or any part thereof takes the form of commission or bonus in respect of the general insurance business of the insurer\nThus looking s. at 31A(1)(c) by itself without the proviso the position is absolutely at clear.\n The respondent cannot be directed to employ the appellants in any capacity so as to include in their remuneration a liability to pay bonus in respect of the general insurance business of the respondent.\nBonus under the Industrial Disputes Act is not a part of wages, but the right to claim bonus which has been universally recognised by industrial adjudication in cases of employment falling under the said Act has now attained the status of a legal right. Bonus can be claimed as a matter of right provided of course by the application of the Full Bench formula it is shown that for the relevant year the employer has sufficient available surplus in hand. Therefore a claim for bonus made by the appellants in the present proceedings is a claim in respect of the general insurance business of the respondent, and if allowed it would add to the remuneration payable to them\nIn other words, bonus claimed by the appellants, if awarded, would, for the purpose of s. 31A (1)(c), be a part of their remuneration, and that is precisely what is prohibited by the said provision. There are, however, certain exceptions to this general prohibition, and it is to one of these exceptions that we must now turn\nProviso (vii) to s. 31A (1)(c) lays down that nothing in this subsection shall be deemed to prohibit- the payment of bonus in any year on a uniform basis to all salaried employees or any class of them by way of additional remuneration, such bonus, in the case of any employee, not exceeding in amount the equivalent of his salary for a period which, in the opinion of the Central Government, is reasonable having regard to the circumstances of the case. This provision which constitutes an exception to the rule prescribed by s. 31A(1)(c) allows the payment of bonus to the employees of Insurance Companies subject to the condition specified by it. Bonus intended to be paid to such employees must not exceed in amount the equivalent of their salary for a period which the Central Government regards as reasonable\nThe result of this provision appears to be that the Central Government has to consider the circumstances of each insurer and then decide whether any bonus should be paid by the insurer to its employees.\n If the financial position of the insurer is sufficiently satisfactory, the Central Government may decide to allow the insurer to pay bonus to its employees, and in that context the Central Government would prescribe the maximum within which the payment should be made. In no case can payment exceed the maximum prescribed by the Central Government, and in all cases the matter has to be considered by the Central Government and no other authority. Having regard to the scheme of the Act which purports to supervise and regulate the working of Insurance Companies the legislature thought that the payment of bonus by the Insurance Companies to their employees should normally be prohibited and its payment should be permitted subject to the over-riding control of the Central Government to prescribe the maximum in that behalf. If the Central Government decides that no bonus should be paid, no bonus can be paid by the insurer\nIf the Central Government decides that bonus should be paid but not beyond specified limit the insurer cannot exceed that limit. That, in our opinion, is the effect of proviso (vii) to s. 31A(1).\nIn our opinion the policy of the relevant clause of the proviso is absolutely clear. Payment of bonus by insurers was intended by the legislature to be conditioned by the provisions contained in the said clause, and we feel no doubt or difficulty in reaching the conclusion that the intervention of the Industrial Tribunals was intended to be excluded and the matter was intended to be kept within the discretion of the Central Government so far as the payment of bonus by the insurers is concerned\nThen, as to the argument that the Government directive issued under proviso (vii) may not be obeyed by any insurer, we do not think that such an event is likely to happen but theoretically it is conceivable that an insurer may refuse to comply with the decision of the Government. In that case all we can say is that there is a lacuna left and the legislature may consider whether it is necessary to provide adequate remedy for making the Government decision binding and final. Having regard to the unqualified and absolute prohibition contained in s. 31A(1)(c) it seems to us difficult to hold that the payment of bonus to the employees of Insurance Companies is not absolutely conditioned by proviso (vii)\nIn the absence of the said provision no bonus could have been claimed by Insurance employees, and so the effect of the said provision must be to limit the said right to the conditions prescribed by it. That is why we think that the Tribunal was right in coming to the conclusion that the reference made by the Central Government is invalid\nThe fact that the Central Government took the view that it could make such a reference 1001 is hardly relevant in determining the scope and effect of the relevant provisions of the Act. This question must be considered on what we regard to be the fair construction of the relevant statutory provision, and as we have just indicated the construction of the relevant provision clearly supports the view taken by the Tribunal\nIn dealing with the character of bonus in relation to remuneration specified by s. 10, S. \n Das, J., who spoke for the Court, observed that bonus in the industrial sense as understood in our country does come out of the available surplus gap, wholly or in the actual wage. id it fills the wage and age in that sense, whether it be called contingent or supplementary", + "expert_4": "The short question of law which falls to be decided in the present appeal is whether a dispute raised by the employees of a General Insurance Company against their employer for payment of bonus in any particular year can be referred for adjudication by an Industrial Tribunal under S. 10(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (XIV of 1947).\nThe workmen of the Hercules Insurance Co. Ltd. are the appellants and the Insurance Company is the respondent before us.\nBefore the Tribunal the respondent urged a preliminary objection against the validity of the reference itself.\nIts case was that the payment of bonus by an Insurance Company is conditioned entirely by the relevant provisions of the Insurance Act, 1938 (IV of 1938), and that the said provisions did not justify the reference of a dispute in that behalf for adjudication by any Industrial Tribunal. This preliminary objection was based on the provisions of S. 31A(1) and proviso (vii) of the Insurance Act.\nThe Tribunal has upheld the preliminary objection thus raised by the respondent and held that the reference is invalid.\nIncidentally it has also considered the plea raised under s. 40C and has observed that the said plea is also well founded In the result the Tribunal refused to entertain the reference and dismissed it accordingly.\nIt is against this order of the Tribunal that the appellants have come to this Court by special leave.\nIt is common ground that the respondent has paid the appellants bonus equivalent to two months basic wages for each of the two years 1954 and 1955. The appellants claim two months basic wages as additional bonus for each of the two years under reference.\nIt is their case that if the trading profits made by the respondent are ascertained from the respondents balance sheet and the Full Bench formula is applied, it would appear that the respondent has in its hands a substantial amount of available surplus from which the additional bonus claimed by them can be awarded.\nThe preliminary objection raised by the respondent is founded on the relevant provisions of s. 31A of the Insurance Act (hereafter called the Act) and so we must now turn to the said provisions. Section 31A(1)(c) of the Act provides, inter alia, that notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Indian Companies Act, 1913, or in the articles of association of the insurer, if a company, or in any contract or agreement, no insurer shall after the expiry of one year from the commencement of the Insurance (Amendment) Act, 1950, be directed or managed by, or employ as manager or officer or in any capacity, any person whose remuneration or any part thereof takes the form of commission or bonus in respect of the general insurance business of the insurer.\nThus looking s. at 31A(1)(c) by itself without the proviso the position is absolutely at clear.\nThe respondent cannot be directed to employ the appellants in any capacity so as to include in their remuneration a liability to pay bonus in respect of the general insurance business of the respondent.\nBonus under the Industrial Disputes Act is not a part of wages, but the right to claim bonus which has been universally recognised by industrial adjudication in cases of employment falling under the said Act has now attained the status of a legal right.\nBonus can be claimed as a matter of right provided of course by the application of the Full Bench formula it is shown that for the relevant year the employer has sufficient available surplus in hand.\nTherefore a claim for bonus made by the appellants in the present proceedings is a claim in respect of the general insurance business of the respondent, and if allowed it would add to the remuneration payable to them.\nIn other words, bonus claimed by the appellants, if awarded, would, for the purpose of s. 31A (1)(c), be a part of their remuneration, and that is precisely what is prohibited by the said provision.\nThere are, however, certain exceptions to this general prohibition, and it is to one of these exceptions that we must now turn.\nProviso (vii) to s. 31A (1)(c) lays down that nothing in this subsection shall be deemed to prohibit- the payment of bonus in any year on a uniform basis to all salaried employees or any class of them by way of additional remuneration, such bonus, in the case of any employee, not exceeding in amount the equivalent of his salary for a period which, in the opinion of the Central Government, is reasonable having regard to the circumstances of the case.\nThis provision which constitutes an exception to the rule prescribed by s. 31A(1)(c) allows the payment of bonus to the employees of Insurance Companies subject to the condition specified by it.\nBonus intended to be paid to such employees must not exceed in amount the equivalent of their salary for a period which the Central Government regards as reasonable. The result of this provision appears to be that the Central Government has to consider the circumstances of each insurer and then decide whether any bonus should be paid by the insurer to its employees.\nIf the financial position of the insurer is sufficiently satisfactory, the Central Government may decide to allow the insurer to pay bonus to its employees, and in that context the Central Government would prescribe the maximum within which the payment should be made.\nIn no case can payment exceed the maximum prescribed by the Central Government, and in all cases the matter has to be considered by the Central Government and no other authority.\nIf the Central Government decides that no bonus should be paid, no bonus can be paid by the insurer. If the Central Government decides that bonus should be paid but not beyond specified limit the insurer cannot exceed that limit.\nThat, in our opinion, is the effect of proviso (vii) to s. 31A(1).\nIt is, however, urged that proviso (vii) merely enables the Central Government to prescribe the maximum.\nIt does not take away the Central Governments authority to refer an industrial dispute in respect of bonus for adjudication under s. 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act.\nIn this connection it is urged by Mr. Mazumdar that in some cases the Central Government may take the view that the financial position of the insurer justified the payment of bonus, but the quantum may be better left to the Industrial Tribunal. In such a case the Central Government should have authority to make the reference.\nSimilarly it is urged that the Central Government may decide that within the maximum prescribed by it, bonus should be paid by an insurer, but the insurer 1000 may not comply with the Central Governments decision and in that case the only way to make the Central Governments decision effective is to refer the matter to adjudication and enable the employees to obtain an award which can be executed.\nThat is why the appellants contend that the enabling provision contained in proviso (vii) should not be construed to constitute a bar against the Central Governments power to act under s. 10(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act.\nWe are not impressed by this argument.\nIn our opinion the policy of the relevant clause of the proviso is absolutely clear. Payment of bonus by insurers was intended by the legislature to be conditioned by the provisions contained in the said clause, and we feel no doubt or difficulty in reaching the conclusion that the intervention of the Industrial Tribunals was intended to be excluded and the matter was intended to be kept within the discretion of the Central Government so far as the payment of bonus by the insurers is concerned.\nHaving regard to the unqualified and absolute prohibition contained in s. 31A(1)(c) it seems to us difficult to hold that the payment of bonus to the employees of Insurance Companies is not absolutely conditioned by proviso (vii).\nIn the absence of the said provision no bonus could have been claimed by Insurance employees, and so the effect of the said provision must be to limit the said right to the conditions prescribed by it.\nThat is why we think that the Tribunal was right in coming to the conclusion that the reference made by the Central Government is invalid.\nThe fact that the Central Government took the view that it could make such a reference 1001 is hardly relevant in determining the scope and effect of the relevant provisions of the Act. This question must be considered on what we regard to be the fair construction of the relevant statutory provision, and as we have just indicated the construction of the relevant provision clearly supports the view taken by the Tribunal.\nIncidentally, it may be pointed out that in its award the Tribunal has referred to several other decisions of Industrial Tribunals which have taken the same view though there are one or two decisions which have upheld the validity of the reference without duly considering the effect of s. 31A(1).\nThe Central Bank of India v. Their Workmen (1), where a similar question has been considered\nIn dealing with the character of bonus in relation to remuneration specified by s. 10, S. \n Das, J., who spoke for the Court, observed that bonus in the industrial sense as understood in our country does come out of the available surplus gap, wholly or in the actual wage. id it fills the wage and age in that sense, whether it be called contingent or supplementary.", + "expert_5": "Section 31A(1)(c) of the Act provides, inter alia, that notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Indian Companies Act, 1913, or in the articles of association of the insurer, if a company, or in any contract or agreement, no insurer shall after the expiry of one year from the commencement of the Insurance (Amendment) Act, 1950, be directed or managed by, or employ as manager or officer or in any capacity, any person whose remuneration or any part thereof takes the form of commission or bonus in respect of the general insurance business of the insurer.\nThe respondent cannot be directed to employ the appellants in any capacity so as to include in their remuneration a liability to pay bonus in respect of the general insurance business of the respondent.\nBonus can be claimed as a matter of right provided of course by the application of the Full Bench formula it is shown that for the relevant year the employer has sufficient available surplus in hand. Therefore a claim for bonus made by the appellants in the present proceedings is a claim in respect of the general insurance business of the respondent, and if allowed it would add to the remuneration payable to them. In other words, bonus claimed by the appellants, if awarded, would, for the purpose of s. 31A (1)(c), be a part of their remuneration, and that is precisely what is prohibited by the said provision.\nProviso (vii) to s. 31A (1)(c) lays down that nothing in this subsection shall be deemed to prohibit- the payment of bonus in any year on a uniform basis to all salaried employees or any class of them by way of additional remuneration, such bonus, in the case of any employee, not exceeding in amount the equivalent of his salary for a period which, in the opinion of the Central Government, is reasonable having regard to the circumstances of the case.\nThis provision which constitutes an exception to the rule prescribed by s. 31A(1)(c) allows the payment of bonus to the employees of Insurance Companies subject to the condition specified by it. Bonus intended to be paid to such employees must not exceed in amount the equivalent of their salary for a period which the Central Government regards as reasonable. The result of this provision appears to be that the Central Government has to consider the circumstances of each insurer and then decide whether any bonus should be paid by the insurer to its employees.\n If the financial position of the insurer is sufficiently satisfactory, the Central Government may decide to allow the insurer to pay bonus to its employees, and in that context the Central Government would prescribe the maximum within which the payment should be made.\nIn no case can payment exceed the maximum prescribed by the Central Government, and in all cases the matter has to be considered by the Central Government and no other authority.\nHaving regard to the scheme of the Act which purports to supervise and regulate the working of Insurance Companies the legislature thought that the payment of bonus by the Insurance Companies to their employees should normally be prohibited and its payment should be permitted subject to the over-riding control of the Central Government to prescribe the maximum in that behalf. If the Central Government decides that no bonus should be paid, no bonus can be paid by the insurer. If the Central Government decides that bonus should be paid but not beyond specified limit the insurer cannot exceed that limit.\nPayment of bonus by insurers was intended by the legislature to be conditioned by the provisions contained in the said clause, and we feel no doubt or difficulty in reaching the conclusion that the intervention of the Industrial Tribunals was intended to be excluded and the matter was intended to be kept within the discretion of the Central Government so far as the payment of bonus by the insurers is concerned.\nwe feel no doubt or difficulty in reaching the conclusion that the intervention of the Industrial Tribunals was intended to be excluded and the matter was intended to be kept within the discretion of the Central Government so far as the payment of bonus by the insurers is concerned.\ntheoretically it is conceivable that an insurer may refuse to comply with the decision of the Government.\nthere is a lacuna left and the legislature may consider whether it is necessary to provide adequate remedy for making the Government decision binding and final.\nHaving regard to the unqualified and absolute prohibition contained in s. 31A(1)(c) it seems to us difficult to hold that the payment of bonus to the employees of Insurance Companies is not absolutely conditioned by proviso (vii). In the absence of the said provision no bonus could have been claimed by Insurance employees, and so the effect of the said provision must be to limit the said right to the conditions prescribed by it.\nThe fact that the Central Government took the view that it could make such a reference 1001 is hardly relevant in determining the scope and effect of the relevant provisions of the Act.\nThis question must be considered on what we regard to be the fair construction of the relevant statutory provision, and as we have just indicated the construction of the relevant provision clearly supports the view taken by the Tribunal." + }, + "1960_87": { + "expert_1": "When the matter came up before the tribunal, the main contention on behalf of the mill was that it was exclusively the management function to decide its labour strength, both qualitatively and quantitatively, and that so far as Ramkrishna Prasad was concerned his position had not been prejudicially affected by the creation of the new post of a store in-charge. The workmen on the other hand contended that Babulal Parekh was first appointed as a mere clerk under Ramkrishna Prasad to begin with and it was only on November 28, 1952, that he was promoted over the head of Ramkrishna Prasad as a store in-charge, thus superseding Ramkrishna Prasad. This stand of the workmen was controverted by the mill and its case was that Babulal Parekh was from the very beginning appointed as store in- charge. The tribunal came to the conclusion after a consideration of the evidence produced that Babulal was first appointed as an ordinary clerk in the Stores Department and was subsequently made a store incharge.\n It held that this caused reasonable heart burning to Ramkrishna Prasad. The tribunal was conscious of the principle that promotion to a higher post was the exclusive function of the management and should not ordinarily be interfered with. But in spite of that it was of the view that this was a fit case for interference but on other considerations which were not specified in the order by the tribunal it held that it would not interfere with the arrangement made by the mill it instead granted an increment of Rs. 30 per month from the date of its order to Ramkrishna Prasad to meet the ends of justice. It is this order which is being challenged before us.\nIn the first place it is urged that the reference was incompetent as sugar was a controlled industry and only the Central Government could have made the reference and not the State Government. Secondly, it is urged that the order of the tribunal granting an increment of Rs. 30 per month to Ramkrishna Prasad was patently perverse and that there was no change in the status or emoluments of Ramkrishna Prasad by the creation of the new post and the employment of Babulal Parekh on it. So far as the question of the competence of the reference is concerned, we are of opinion that there is no force in it, A similar question was raised before this Court in The Bijoy Cotton Mills Ltd. v. Their Workmen and Another (1) and it was held there on the language of s. 2(a)(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, that before that provision could apply to a controlled industry there must be a notification by the Central Government for the purposes of s. 2(a)(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act.\nIt is true that sugar is a controlled industry under the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951, but that in our opinion does not conclude the matter. In order that the appropriate government under s. 2(a)(1) may be the Central Government for a controlled industry, it is necessary that such controlled industry should be specified by the Central Government for the purposes of s. 2(a)(1).\nThis in our opinion is obvious from the words controlled industry as may be specified in this behalf by the Central Government appearing in s. 2(a)(1).\n It is not enough that an industry should be a controlled industry to attract this provision of s. 2(a)(1) it is further necessary that it should be specified in this behalf, namely for the purposes of s. 2(a)(1), as a controlled industry by the Central Government, before the Central Government can become the appropriate government within the meaning of s. 2(a)(1).\nWe are of opinion that is the correct meaning of these words appearing in s. 2(a)(1), as already held in The Bijoy Cotton Mills Ltd. (2) . The objection that the reference was not competent therefore fails. We next come to the contention raised on behalf of the mill that there was in fact no prejudice whatsoever so far as the status and emoluments of Ramkrishna Prasad were concerned by the creation of the new post and the appointment of Babulal Parekh on it, and that the tribunal was not justified in any case in granting an increment of Rs. 30 per menses to Ramkrishna Prasad.\nThe main consideration which influenced the tribunal in passing the order which it did was that in the view of the tribunal Ramkrishna Prasad was superseded by Babulal Parekh who was first appointed as a clerk under him. This view of I.L.R. 1955 MYS. 546. (2) 1960 2 S.C.R. 982. the tribunal in our opinion is patently erroneous.\nThe appointment order dated October 4, 1952, clearly shows that Babulal Parekh was appointed as store inches from the very beginning at Rs. 180 per month.\nThe tribunal, however, completely overlooked that from October 7 to November 9, Babulal Parekh was marked present which would show that he was not a clerk.\n The tribunal also overlooked that even from November 28 to the end of December when Babulal Parekh admittedly was not a clerk but store in- charge he still signed the register, though he should have been marked present. Chaudhari was unable to explain how this happened, but he was hardly the person to explain this. It is, however, clear from this confusion that no importance can be attached to whether Babulal Parekh was marked present in the register or signed it. The real thing which determined the status of Babulal Parekh was the appointment order dated October 4, 1952, which the tribunal has accepted as correct.\nWe cannot accept the suggestion on behalf of the respondents that the appointment order was ante-dated, for no such suggestion was made to Chaudhari and the tribunal itself does not find so. It is clear therefore that the finding of the tribunal that Babulal Parekh was appointed as clerk under Ramkrishna Prasad to begin with is patently perverse and it must be held that Babulal Parekh was from the very beginning working as store in-charge.\nNow in so far as Ramkrishna Prasad was concerned his work and emoluments remained the same after the appointment of Babulal Parekh. If a higher post was created in the Stores Department because of the increase in work, Ramkrishna Prasad could not claim promotion to it merely because he was working as a store-keeper before.", + "expert_2": "On November 28, 1952, an order was passed by the mill distributing the duties between the various clerks employed in the Stores Department and it was stated therein that all the staff of the Stores Department would work as subordinate to Babulal Parekh. On December 2, 1952, another order was passed by which Ramkrishna Prasad was ordered to hand over the keys of the stores to Babulal Parekh. Thereafter Ramkrishna Prasad made a representation against his being made subordinate to the stores in-charge.\nthe reference was incompetent as sugar was a controlled industry and only the Central Government could have made the reference and not the State Government.\nThe argument is that as sugar is a controlled industry under the Schedule to the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, No. 65 of 1951, the appropriate (1) 1960 2 S.C.R- 982, Government for the purposes of s. 2(a)(1) with reference to the sugar Industry is the Central Government.\nIt is not enough that an industry should be a controlled industry to attract this provision of s. 2(a)(1) it is further necessary that it should be specified in this behalf, namely for the purposes of s. 2(a)(1), as a controlled industry by the Central Government, before the Central Government can become the appropriate government within the meaning of s. 2(a)(1). We may in this connection refer to Firebricks and Potteries Ltd., etc. v. Firebricks and Potteries Ltd. Workers Union Ltd. (1) where the same view has been taken. We are of opinion that is the correct meaning of these words appearing in s. 2(a)(1), as already held in The Bijoy Cotton Mills Ltd. (2) .\nThe main consideration which influenced the tribunal in passing the order which it did was that in the view of the tribunal Ramkrishna Prasad was superseded by Babulal Parekh who was first appointed as a clerk under him.\nThe real thing which determined the status of Babulal Parekh was the appointment order dated October 4, 1952, which the tribunal has accepted as correct.\nIt is clear therefore that the finding of the tribunal that Babulal Parekh was appointed as clerk under Ramkrishna Prasad to begin with is patently perverse and it must be held that Babulal Parekh was from the very beginning working as store in-charge. Now in so far as Ramkrishna Prasad was concerned his work and emoluments remained the same after the appointment of Babulal Parekh. If a higher post was created in the Stores Department because of the increase in work, Ramkrishna Prasad could not claim promotion to it merely because he was working as a store-keeper before.", + "expert_3": "The appellant is a Sugar Mill in District Saran in the State of Bihar. One Ramkrishna Prasad was appointed as clerk in this mill in 1933. Gradually, he worked his way up and was drawing Rs. 140 per month in October 1952\nThe mill created a new post of store in-charge about that time as the work in the Stores Department of the Mill had increased. On October 4, 1952, Babulal Parekh was appointed to this new post on a consolidated salary of Rs. 180 per menses. A letter of appointment was issued to him on that date and he was told that he would be on probation for one year. He was also asked by another letter to take charge immediately. He took charge on October 7, 1952.\nOn November 28, 1952, an order was passed by the mill distributing the duties between the various clerks employed in the Stores Department and it was stated therein that all the staff of the Stores Department would work as subordinate to Babulal Parekh. On December 2, 1952, another order was passed by which Ramkrishna Prasad was ordered to hand over the keys of the stores to Babulal Parekh.\nThereafter Ramkrishna Prasad made a representation against his being made subordinate to the stores in-charge. This representation was rejected\nA dispute was then raised by the union and a reference was made by the Government of Bihar on May 9, 1956, in which the following three matters were referred to the tribunal- \n Whether the status of workman, Sri Ramkrishna Prasad, Store-keeper, and the nature of the job performed by him has been changed to his prejudice with the appointment of a separate store in charge \n Whether in view of the satisfactory performance of duties of store-keeper for the last 20 years by the above- named workman, it was at all necessary to appoint a separate store in-charge over him with higher emoluments and whether Shri Ramkrishna Prasad is entitled to be appointed to the post of store in-charge and \n Whether the claim of the above-named workman for promotion to higher grades has been overlooked by the management, and if so, what relief the workman is entitled to\nThe tribunal came to the conclusion after a consideration of the evidence produced that Babulal was first appointed as an ordinary clerk in the Stores Department and was subsequently made a store incharge\nIt held that this caused reasonable heart burning to Ramkrishna Prasad. The tribunal was conscious of the principle that promotion to a higher post was the exclusive function of the management and should not ordinarily be interfered with. But in spite of that it was of the view that this was a fit case for interference but on other considerations which were not specified in the order by the tribunal it held that it would not interfere with the arrangement made by the mill it instead granted an increment of Rs. 30 per month from the date of its order to Ramkrishna Prasad to meet the ends of justice. It is this order which is being challenged before us.\nSo far as the question of the competence of the reference is concerned, we are of opinion that there is no force in it, A similar question was raised before this Court in The Bijoy Cotton Mills Ltd. v. Their Workmen and Another (1) and it was held there on the language of s. 2(a)(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, that before that provision could apply to a controlled industry there must be a notification by the Central Government for the purposes of s. 2(a)(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act\nThe argument is that as sugar is a controlled industry under the Schedule to the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, No. 65 of 1951, the appropriate (1) 1960 2 S.C.R- 982, Government for the purposes of s. 2(a)(1) with reference to the sugar Industry is the Central Government. Reliance is placed on the words concerning any such controlled industry as may be specified in this behalf by the Central Government appearing in s. 2 (a)(1\nIt is true that sugar is a controlled industry under the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951, but that in our opinion does not conclude the matter. In order that the appropriate government under s. 2(a)(1) may be the Central Government for a controlled industry, it is necessary that such controlled industry should be specified by the Central Government for the purposes of s. 2(a)(1). This in our opinion is obvious from the words controlled industry as may be specified in this behalf by the Central Government appearing in s. 2(a)(1).\nIt is not enough that an industry should be a controlled industry to attract this provision of s. 2(a)(1) it is further necessary that it should be specified in this behalf, namely for the purposes of s. 2(a)(1), as a controlled industry by the Central Government, before the Central Government can become the appropriate government within the meaning of s. 2(a)(1)\nThe objection that the reference was not competent therefore fails\nWe next come to the contention raised on behalf of the mill that there was in fact no prejudice whatsoever so far as the status and emoluments of Ramkrishna Prasad were concerned by the creation of the new post and the appointment of Babulal Parekh on it, and that the tribunal was not justified in any case in granting an increment of Rs. 30 per menses to Ramkrishna Prasad.\nThe main consideration which influenced the tribunal in passing the order which it did was that in the view of the tribunal Ramkrishna Prasad was superseded by Babulal Parekh who was first appointed as a clerk under him. This view of I.L.R. 1955 MYS. 546. (2) 1960 2 S.C.R. 982. the tribunal in our opinion is patently erroneous. The appointment order dated October 4, 1952, clearly shows that Babulal Parekh was appointed as store inches from the very beginning at Rs. 180 per month.\nThe tribunal referred to certain entries in the attendance register to hold that Babulal Parekh worked as clerk to begin with.\n It appears from the attendance register for the months of October, November and December that Babulal Parekh was marked present from October 7 to November 9. Thereafter from November 11 to the end of December he signed the attendance register. The statement of Cbaudhari, Labour Welfare Officer of the mill was that the practice in the mill was that officers used to be marked present in the attendance register while clerks used to sign it themselves\nThe tribunal has concluded from the fact that Babulal. Parekh signed the register in November that he must have been a clerk to begin with. The tribunal, however, completely overlooked that from October 7 to November 9, Babulal Parekh was marked present which would show that he was not a clerk.\n The tribunal also overlooked that even from November 28 to the end of December when Babulal Parekh admittedly was not a clerk but store in- charge he still signed the register, though he should have been marked present\nIt is, however, clear from this confusion that no importance can be attached to whether Babulal Parekh was marked present in the register or signed it. The real thing which determined the status of Babulal Parekh was the appointment order dated October 4, 1952, which the tribunal has accepted as correct\nA question was certainly put to Chaudhari at the end of his cross-examination that he had manufactured the statements put in by him only the night before but he denied it. We cannot accept the suggestion on behalf of the respondents that the appointment order was ante-dated, for no such suggestion was made to Chaudhari and the tribunal itself does not find so. It is clear therefore that the finding of the tribunal that Babulal Parekh was appointed as clerk under Ramkrishna Prasad to begin with is patently perverse and it must be held that Babulal Parekh was from the very beginning working as store in-charge\nNow in so far as Ramkrishna Prasad was concerned his work and emoluments remained the same after the appointment of Babulal Parekh. If a higher post was created in the Stores Department because of the increase in work, Ramkrishna Prasad could not claim promotion to it merely because he was working as a store-keeper before", + "expert_4": "The appellant is a Sugar Mill in District Saran in the State of Bihar.\nOne Ramkrishna Prasad was appointed as clerk in this mill in 1933.\nThe mill created a new post of store in-charge about that time as the work in the Stores Department of the Mill had increased. On October 4, 1952, Babulal Parekh was appointed to this new post on a consolidated salary of Rs. 180 per menses.\nOn November 28, 1952, an order was passed by the mill distributing the duties between the various clerks employed in the Stores Department and it was stated therein that all the staff of the Stores Department would work as subordinate to Babulal Parekh.\nThereafter Ramkrishna Prasad made a representation against his being made subordinate to the stores in-charge.\nThis representation was rejected.\nA dispute was then raised by the union and a reference was made by the Government of Bihar on May 9, 1956, in which the following three matters were referred to the tribunal- \n Whether the status of workman, Sri Ramkrishna Prasad, Store-keeper, and the nature of the job performed by him has been changed to his prejudice with the appointment of a separate store in charge \n Whether in view of the satisfactory performance of duties of store-keeper for the last 20 years by the above- named workman, it was at all necessary to appoint a separate store in-charge over him with higher emoluments and whether Shri Ramkrishna Prasad is entitled to be appointed to the post of store in-charge and \n Whether the claim of the above-named workman for promotion to higher grades has been overlooked by the management, and if so, what relief the workman is entitled to.\nWhen the matter came up before the tribunal, the main contention on behalf of the mill was that it was exclusively the management function to decide its labour strength, both qualitatively and quantitatively, and that so far as Ramkrishna Prasad was concerned his position had not been prejudicially affected by the creation of the new post of a store in-charge.\nThe tribunal came to the conclusion after a consideration of the evidence produced that Babulal was first appointed as an ordinary clerk in the Stores Department and was subsequently made a store incharge.\nThe tribunal was conscious of the principle that promotion to a higher post was the exclusive function of the management and should not ordinarily be interfered with.\nBut in spite of that it was of the view that this was a fit case for interference but on other considerations which were not specified in the order by the tribunal it held that it would not interfere with the arrangement made by the mill it instead granted an increment of Rs. 30 per month from the date of its order to Ramkrishna Prasad to meet the ends of justice.\nTwo points have been urged before us on behalf of the appellant.\nIn the first place it is urged that the reference was incompetent as sugar was a controlled industry and only the Central Government could have made the reference and not the State Government. Secondly, it is urged that the order of the tribunal granting an increment of Rs. 30 per month to Ramkrishna Prasad was patently perverse and that there was no change in the status or emoluments of Ramkrishna Prasad by the creation of the new post and the employment of Babulal Parekh on it.\nSo far as the question of the competence of the reference is concerned, we are of opinion that there is no force in it, A similar question was raised before this Court in The Bijoy Cotton Mills Ltd. v. Their Workmen and Another (1) and it was held there on the language of s. 2(a)(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, that before that provision could apply to a controlled industry there must be a notification by the Central Government for the purposes of s. 2(a)(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act.\nSection 2(a)(1) is in these terms- I Appropriate Government means in relation to any industrial dispute concerning any industry carried on by or under the authority of the Central Government or by a railway company or concerning any such controlled industry as maybe specified in this behalf by the Central Government, or in relation to an industrial dispute concerning a banking or an insurance company, a mine, an oil-field or a, major port, the Central Government.\nIt is true that sugar is a controlled industry under the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951, but that in our opinion does not conclude the matter.\nIn order that the appropriate government under s. 2(a)(1) may be the Central Government for a controlled industry, it is necessary that such controlled industry should be specified by the Central Government for the purposes of s. 2(a)(1). This in our opinion is obvious from the words controlled industry as may be specified in this behalf by the Central Government appearing in s. 2(a)(1).\n It is not enough that an industry should be a controlled industry to attract this provision of s. 2(a)(1) it is further necessary that it should be specified in this behalf, namely for the purposes of s. 2(a)(1), as a controlled industry by the Central\nGovernment, before the Central Government can become the appropriate government within the meaning of s. 2(a)(1).\nWe may in this connection refer to Firebricks and Potteries Ltd., etc. v. Firebricks and Potteries Ltd. Workers Union Ltd. (1) where the same view has been taken.\nWe are of opinion that is the correct meaning of these words appearing in s. 2(a)(1), as already held in The Bijoy Cotton Mills Ltd. (2)\nThe objection that the reference was not competent therefore fails.\nWe next come to the contention raised on behalf of the mill that there was in fact no prejudice whatsoever so far as the status and emoluments of Ramkrishna Prasad were concerned by the creation of the new post and the appointment of Babulal Parekh on it, and that the tribunal was not justified in any case in granting an increment of Rs. 30 per menses to Ramkrishna Prasad.\nThe main consideration which influenced the tribunal in passing the order which it did was that in the view of the tribunal Ramkrishna Prasad was superseded by Babulal Parekh who was first appointed as a clerk under him.\nThis view of I.L.R. 1955 MYS. 546. (2) 1960 2 S.C.R. 982. the tribunal in our opinion is patently erroneous.\nThe appointment order dated October 4, 1952, clearly shows that Babulal Parekh was appointed as store inches from the very beginning at Rs. 180 per month.\nIt appears from the attendance register for the months of October, November and December that Babulal Parekh was marked present from October 7 to November 9. Thereafter from November 11 to the end of December he signed the attendance register. The statement of Cbaudhari, Labour Welfare Officer of the mill was that the practice in the mill was that officers used to be marked present in the attendance register while clerks used to sign it themselves.\nThe tribunal has concluded from the fact that Babulal.\nParekh signed the register in November that he must have been a clerk to begin with.\nThe tribunal, however, completely overlooked that from October 7 to November 9, Babulal Parekh was marked present which would show that he was not a clerk.\nThe tribunal also overlooked that even from November 28 to the end of December when Babulal Parekh admittedly was not a clerk but store in- charge he still signed the register, though he should have been marked present.\nChaudhari was unable to explain how this happened, but he was hardly the person to explain this. It is, however, clear from this confusion that no importance can be attached to whether Babulal Parekh was marked present in the register or signed it. The real thing which determined the status of Babulal Parekh was the appointment order dated October 4, 1952, which the tribunal has accepted as correct.\nA question was certainly put to Chaudhari at the end of his cross-examination that he had manufactured the statements put in by him only the night before but he denied it.\nWe cannot accept the suggestion on behalf of the respondents that the appointment order was ante-dated, for no such suggestion was made to Chaudhari and the tribunal itself does not find so.\nIt is clear therefore that the finding of the tribunal that Babulal Parekh was appointed as clerk under Ramkrishna Prasad to begin with is patently perverse and it must be held that Babulal Parekh was from the very beginning working as store in-charge.\nNow in so far as Ramkrishna Prasad was concerned his work and emoluments remained the same after the appointment of Babulal Parekh. If a higher post was created in the Stores Department because of the increase in work, Ramkrishna Prasad could not claim promotion to it merely because he was working as a store-keeper before.", + "expert_5": "in October 1952. The mill created a new post of store in-charge about that time as the work in the Stores Department of the Mill had increased. On October 4, 1952, Babulal Parekh was appointed to this new post on a consolidated salary of Rs. 180 per menses. A letter of appointment was issued to him on that date and he was told that he would be on probation for one year. He was also asked by another letter to take charge immediately.\nHe took charge on October 7, 1952.\nSo far as the question of the competence of the reference is concerned, we are of opinion that there is no force in it,\nSection 2(a)(1) is in these terms- I Appropriate Government means in relation to any industrial dispute concerning any industry carried on by or under the authority of the Central Government or by a railway company or concerning any such controlled industry as maybe specified in this behalf by the Central Government, or in relation to an industrial dispute concerning a banking or an insurance company, a mine, an oil-field or a, major port, the Central Government.\nIn order that the appropriate government under s. 2(a)(1) may be the Central Government for a controlled industry, it is necessary that such controlled industry should be specified by the Central Government for the purposes of s. 2(a)(1). This in our opinion is obvious from the words controlled industry as may be specified in this behalf by the Central Government appearing in s. 2(a)(1).\nIt is not enough that an industry should be a controlled industry to attract this provision of s. 2(a)(1) it is further necessary that it should be specified in this behalf, namely for the purposes of s. 2(a)(1), as a controlled industry by the Central Government, before the Central Government can become the appropriate government within the meaning of s. 2(a)(1).\nThis view of I.L.R. 1955 MYS. 546. (2) 1960 2 S.C.R. 982. the tribunal in our opinion is patently erroneous.\nThe appointment order dated October 4, 1952, clearly shows that Babulal Parekh was appointed as store inches from the very beginning at Rs. 180 per month.\nIt appears from the attendance register for the months of October, November and December that Babulal Parekh was marked present from October 7 to November 9. Thereafter from November 11 to the end of December he signed the attendance register.\nThe tribunal, however, completely overlooked that from October 7 to November 9, Babulal Parekh was marked present which would show that he was not a clerk.\nThe tribunal also overlooked that even from November 28 to the end of December when Babulal Parekh admittedly was not a clerk but store in- charge he still signed the register, though he should have been marked present.\nIt is, however, clear from this confusion that no importance can be attached to whether Babulal Parekh was marked present in the register or signed it.\nThe real thing which determined the status of Babulal Parekh was the appointment order dated October 4, 1952, which the tribunal has accepted as correct.\nIt is clear therefore that the finding of the tribunal that Babulal Parekh was appointed as clerk under Ramkrishna Prasad to begin with is patently perverse and it must be held that Babulal Parekh was from the very beginning working as store in-charge.\nIf a higher post was created in the Stores Department because of the increase in work, Ramkrishna Prasad could not claim promotion to it merely because he was working as a store-keeper before." + }, + "1961_344": { + "expert_1": "Appeal by special leave from the judgment and decree dated June 23, 1959, of the Calcutta High Court in Appeal from Original Decree No. 50 of 1955.\nThe Judgment of the Court was delivered by SHAH, J.-Mr. Justice Bachawat of the High Court of Judicature at Calcutta decreed Suit No. 1039 of 1948 filed by one Pearey Lal-hereinafter called the plaintiff-for a decree for Rs. 1,35,000/- with interest against the New Bank of India Ltd. \nThe appeal of the Bank against the decree was dismissed by a Division Bench of the High Court. With special leave the Bank has appealed to this Court.\nThe plaintiff claimed by his suit that he had entrusted to the Bank at its registered office at Lahore Rs. 1,35,000/- on July 18 and 19, 1947, with instructions to transmit the same to the branch of the Bank which it proposed to open at Calcutta and to hold the amount subject to further instructions to be given by him when he would call personally at the branch at Calcutta on or after the opening date, that prior to the opening of the said Calcutta Branch the plaintiff countermanded his instructions on or about September 13, 1947 and demanded at Lahore that it be returned, but the Bank wrongfully claimed to have remitted the two sums to its Calcutta Branch and to have kept the same in a fixed deposit account in the name of the plaintiff, even though the plaintiff, had opened no such account at the Calcutta Branch and had given no instructions to put the same into any account by way of fixed deposit or otherwise. The plaintiff, accordingly, claimed that the Bank was a trustee for transmission of the amount and in the absence of any instructions given by him for opening a fixed deposit account, in respect of the amount transmitted the Bank stood qua the plaintiff in a fiduciary relation and was liable to refund the full amount.\nIn substance, it was claimed by the plaintiff that the amount lying with the Bank at Calcutta was not a deposit within the meaning of the scheme and was not liable to any reduction.\nThe Bank submitted that the amount of Rs. 1,35,000/- was deposited by the plaintiff at its head office at Lahore for the purpose of opening a fixed deposit account in the name of the plaintiff upon the terms that the fixed deposit would carry interest as on the respective dates of the deposits, that it was agreed that the plaintiff would be allowed to take loans upto 90 of the deposit at a rate of interest of half percent above the current fixed deposit rates and that the amount would be transmitted to the Calcutta Branch of the Bank for the purpose of crediting the same to the fixed deposit account of the plaintiff.\nThe Bank denied the alleged instructions in September, 1947, countermanding the original arrangement and contended that the plaintiff was bound by the scheme of arrangement sanctioned by the High Court of East Punjab.\nThe Bank offered to pay the amount due to the plaintiff under the scheme of arrangement and also to allot shares of the value of 5 in accordance with the scheme. A decree on admission was passed against the Bank for Rs. 81,000/- and the suit was contested by the Bank for the balance of the claim.\nThe trial Court held that even though the plaintiff failed to prove the instructions in the month of September, 1947, set up by him countermanding transmission, it was established on the evidence, that the plaintiff had entrusted to the Bank Rs. 1,35,000/- for transmission and the plaintiff having given no further instructions, the Bank held the amount as trustee for the plaintiff and that the plaintiffs claim was not liable to be reduced under the scheme sanctioned by the High Court of East Punjab. The Court also negatived the plea of the Bank that the amount of Rs. 1,35,000/- was deposited with the Bank at Lahore for opening a fixed deposit account subject to the conditions which the Bank set up. The finding of the trial Court were confirmed, in appeal, by a Division Bench of the High Court at Calcutta. The facts found proved, according to the findings of the trial Court and confirmed by the High Court are therefore that the plaintiff delivered an amount of Rs. 1,25,000/- on July 19, 1947, and Rs. 10,000/- on July 19, 1947, to the Bank at Lahore for transmission to Calcutta, with instructions to await the directions of the plaintiff regarding the opening of accounts for keeping the same in fixed deposit or otherwise in the Calcutta Branch of the Bank, and the plaintiff never gave instructions for opening any account, fixed deposit or otherwise, in regard to the amounts after they reached Calcutta. Delivery of the amount for transmission to the Bank created ex facie a relationship of a fiduciary character. But counsel for the Bank contends that when the amount was handed over at Lahore to the Bank by the plaintiff who was an old constituent of the Bank it must be presumed that a relationship of debtor and creditor arose and by the addition of instructions for transmissions of the amount to another branch the relationship of trustee and cestuique-trust did not arise. He submitted that the contention that the relation between the plaintiff and the Bank was of creditor and debtor was supported by three important circumstances (1) that the Bank agreed to pay interest on the amount delivered by the plaintiff (2) that the Bank charged no commission or remuneration for transmission of the amount and (3) that even on the plaintiffs case the amount was to be utilized for opening fixed deposit accounts at Calcutta.\nIt is true that in the absence of other evidence a person paying money into a Bank, whether he is a constituent of the Bank or not, may be presumed to have paid the money to be held as bankers ordinarily hold the moneys of their constituents. If no specific instructions are given at the time of payment or thereafter, and even if the money is held in a suspense account the bank does not thereby become a trustee for the amount paid. In other words, when a person dealing with a bank delivers money to the Bank an intention to create a relation of creditor and debtor between him and the Bank is presumed, it being the normal course of the business of the Bank to accept deposits from its customers. But this presumption is one of fact arising from the nature of the business carried on by the Bank and is rebutted by proof of special instructions, or circumstances attending the transaction. Where the money is paid to a bank with special instructions to retain the same pending further instructions (The Official Assignee, Madras v. Natesam Pillai (1)) or to pay over the same to another person who has no banking account with the bank and the bank accepts the instructions and holds the money pending instructions from that other person (Arbuthnot Co. v. D. Rajam Ayyar (2)), or where instructions are given by a customer to his banker that a part of the amount lying in his account be forwarded to another bank to meet a bill to become due and payable by him and the amount is sent by the banker as directed (Farley v. Turner (3)), a trust results and the presumption which ordinarily arises by reason of payment of the money to the bank is rebutted.\nIt is not necessary in this appeal to consider whether because of an agreement to pay interest the relationship may be deemed to be of debtor and creditor, because it was held by both the courts below that no such agreement is proved, and according to the settled practice of this court the finding is regarded a binding. The Bank charged no commission or remuneration for transmitting the amount to Calcutta, but that, in our judgment, is a circumstance which permits of no inference against the plaintiff. Undoubtedly, when the amount was delivered to the Bank by the plaintiff it was his intention to open fixed deposit account in Calcutta with the Banks branch but the fixed deposit accounts were to be opened after instructions were received. \nThe transaction, as evidenced by the two receipts, was primarily one of entrustment of the amount to the Bank for transmission to Calcutta. After the purpose for which the moneys were entrusted was carried out, in the absence of further instructions the defendant did not cease to be a trustee. So long as instructions were not given by the plaintiff for appropriation of the amounts the Bank continued to hold the amounts transmitted for and on behalf of the plaintiff and there is no evidence that the plaintiff gave instructions or acquiesced in the opening of a fixed deposit account after the same reached Calcutta. It is immaterial that the Bank purported to open fixed deposit account in the name of the plaintiff with the amounts received at its head office at Lahore. That course of action was adopted without the consent of the plaintiff and it could not bind the plaintiff.\nIt is not necessary in this appeal to consider whether because of an agreement to pay interest the relationship may be deemed to be of debtor and creditor, because it was held by both the courts below that no such agreement is proved, and according to the settled practice of this court the finding is regarded a binding. The Bank charged no commission or remuneration for transmitting the amount to Calcutta, but that, in our judgment, is a circumstance which permits of no inference against the plaintiff.\nThe High Court was, therefore, right in holding that the amount delivered by the plaintiff to the Bank at Lahore remained in trust even after it reached Calcutta, and it was not held by the Bank, in deposit for the plaintiff within the meaning of the scheme sanctioned by the High Court of East Punjab.", + "expert_2": "In view of the impending partition, the plaintiff was anxious to transfer his moveable property outside the territory it was apprehended would be included in Pakistan, and he gave instructions for transferring his accounts with the Bank to its other branches in India.\nDuring the pendency of the suit the High Court of East Punjab sanctioned a scheme for arrangement under ss. 153 and 153A of the Indian Companies Act, 1913, for settlement of the liability of the Bank. By the first clause of the scheme the expression deposit was to include Fixed Deposits, Banks own Cash Certificates, Current Accounts, Deposits at Call, Savings Fund Accounts Amounts lying in Sundries or in any other kind of Credit Accounts, Bank Drafts, Cash Orders, and documents of the like nature and amounts due to Bankers over and above the value of Government Securities lying with them against such depositors. It was directed by the scheme, as it finally emerged, that the depositors were to be paid 701/2 of the deposits held by them and to he allotted shares of the face value of 5 of the deposits.\nIn substance, it was claimed by the plaintiff that the amount lying with the Bank at Calcutta was not a deposit within the meaning of the scheme and was not liable to any reduction.\nThe Bank denied the alleged instructions in September, 1947, countermanding the original arrangement and contended that the plaintiff was bound by the scheme of arrangement sanctioned by the High Court of East Punjab.\nthe Bank held the amount as trustee for the plaintiff and that the plaintiffs claim was not liable to be reduced under the scheme sanctioned by the High Court of East Punjab.\nThe finding of the trial Court were confirmed, in appeal, by a Division Bench of the High Court at Calcutta.\nIf no specific instructions are given at the time of payment or thereafter, and even if the money is held in a suspense account the bank does not thereby become a trustee for the amount paid. In other words, when a person dealing with a bank delivers money to the Bank an intention to create a relation of creditor and debtor between him and the Bank is presumed, it being the normal course of the business of the Bank to accept deposits from its customers. But this presumption is one of fact arising from the nature of the business carried on by the Bank and is rebutted by proof of special instructions, or circumstances attending the transaction.\nUndoubtedly, when the amount was delivered to the Bank by the plaintiff it was his intention to open fixed deposit account in Calcutta with the Banks branch but the fixed deposit accounts were to be opened after instructions were received.\nAfter the purpose for which the moneys were entrusted was carried out, in the absence of further instructions the defendant did not cease to be a trustee. So long as instructions were not given by the plaintiff for appropriation of the amounts the Bank continued to hold the amounts transmitted for and on behalf of the plaintiff and there is no evidence that the plaintiff gave instructions or acquiesced in the opening of a fixed deposit account after the same reached Calcutta. It is immaterial that the Bank purported to open fixed deposit account in the name of the plaintiff with the amounts received at its head office at Lahore. That course of action was adopted without the consent of the plaintiff and it could not bind the plaintiff.", + "expert_3": "Justice Bachawat of the High Court of Judicature at Calcutta decreed Suit No. 1039 of 1948 filed by one Pearey Lal-hereinafter called the plaintiff-for a decree for Rs. 1,35,000/- with interest against the New Bank of India Ltd. \nThe appeal of the Bank against the decree was dismissed by a Division Bench of the High Court. With special leave the Bank has appealed to this Court\nThe Bank had its registered office, originally at Lahore but after the partition of India the office was transferred to Amritsar. The plaintiff who was a resident of Lahore had accounts with several banks including the New Bank of India Ltd.\nIn view of the impending partition, the plaintiff was anxious to transfer his moveable property outside the territory it was apprehended would be included in Pakistan, and he gave instructions for transferring his accounts with the Bank to its other branches in India. He also paid an amount of Rs. 1,25,000/- on July 18, 1947, into the Bank at Lahore with instructions to transmit the same the to Bank branch at Calcutta which it then proposed to open in the near future. An amount of Rs. 10,000/- was also paid into the Bank at Lahore on July 19, 1947, with similar instructions. In respect of these two transactions the Bank executed receipts which are set out below Received the sum of Rs. 1,25,000/- (Rs. One Lac twenty five thousand) only from Mr\nPearey Lal on account of amount to be remitted to Calcutta branch for preparing various F.D. Receipts subject to his instructions on or after the opening date when he would call upon them personally. Lahore for the New Bank of India Ltd.\nThe two amounts were transmitted by the Bank to Calcutta. A branch of the Bank was opened at Calcutta on September 24, 1947, but within a few days thereafter the Bank ceased making payments. It appears that a moratorium for a limited period was declared under an Ordinance issued by the Governer-General restraining the Bank from making payments to its depositors\nIn December, 1947, after the expiry of the period of the moratorium the plaintiff applied to the Banks branch at Calcutta for facility to withdraw the whole amount but the Calcutta Branch raised certain technical objections against such a course. On March 24, 1948 the plaintiff commenced an action against the Bank inter alia for a decree of Rs. 1,35,000/- in the Calcutta High Court on its original side\nDuring the pendency of the suit the High Court of East Punjab sanctioned a scheme for arrangement under ss. 153 and 153A of the Indian Companies Act, 1913, for settlement of the liability of the Bank. By the first clause of the scheme the expression deposit was to include Fixed Deposits, Banks own Cash Certificates, Current Accounts, Deposits at Call, Savings Fund Accounts Amounts lying in Sundries or in any other kind of Credit Accounts, Bank Drafts, Cash Orders, and documents of the like nature and amounts due to Bankers over and above the value of Government Securities lying with them against such depositors. It was directed by the scheme, as it finally emerged, that the depositors were to be paid 701/2 of the deposits held by them and to he allotted shares of the face value of 5 of the deposits\nThe plaintiff claimed by his suit that he had entrusted to the Bank at its registered office at Lahore Rs. 1,35,000/- on July 18 and 19, 1947, with instructions to transmit the same to the branch of the Bank which it proposed to open at Calcutta and to hold the amount subject to further instructions to be given by him when he would call personally at the branch at Calcutta on or after the opening date, that prior to the opening of the said Calcutta Branch the plaintiff countermanded his instructions on or about September 13, 1947 and demanded at Lahore that it be returned, but the Bank wrongfully claimed to have remitted the two sums to its Calcutta Branch and to have kept the same in a fixed deposit account in the name of the plaintiff, even though the plaintiff, had opened no such account at the Calcutta Branch and had given no instructions to put the same into any account by way of fixed deposit or otherwise. The plaintiff, accordingly, claimed that the Bank was a trustee for transmission of the amount and in the absence of any instructions given by him for opening a fixed deposit account, in respect of the amount transmitted the Bank stood qua the plaintiff in a fiduciary relation and was liable to refund the full amount\nIn substance, it was claimed by the plaintiff that the amount lying with the Bank at Calcutta was not a deposit within the meaning of the scheme and was not liable to any reduction.\nThe Bank offered to pay the amount due to the plaintiff under the scheme of arrangement and also to allot shares of the value of 5 in accordance with the scheme. A decree on admission was passed against the Bank for Rs. 81,000/- and the suit was contested by the Bank for the balance of the claim.\nThe trial Court held that even though the plaintiff failed to prove the instructions in the month of September, 1947, set up by him countermanding transmission, it was established on the evidence, that the plaintiff had entrusted to the Bank Rs. 1,35,000/- for transmission and the plaintiff having given no further instructions, the Bank held the amount as trustee for the plaintiff and that the plaintiffs claim was not liable to be reduced under the scheme sanctioned by the High Court of East Punjab. The Court also negatived the plea of the Bank that the amount of Rs. 1,35,000/- was deposited with the Bank at Lahore for opening a fixed deposit account subject to the conditions which the Bank set up. The finding of the trial Court were confirmed, in appeal, by a Division Bench of the High Court at Calcutta\nthe plaintiff delivered an amount of Rs. 1,25,000/- on July 19, 1947, and Rs. 10,000/- on July 19, 1947, to the Bank at Lahore for transmission to Calcutta, with instructions to await the directions of the plaintiff regarding the opening of accounts for keeping the same in fixed deposit or otherwise in the Calcutta Branch of the Bank, and the plaintiff never gave instructions for opening any account, fixed deposit or otherwise, in regard to the amounts after they reached Calcutta.\nDelivery of the amount for transmission to the Bank created ex facie a relationship of a fiduciary character.\nIt is true that in the absence of other evidence a person paying money into a Bank, whether he is a constituent of the Bank or not, may be presumed to have paid the money to be held as bankers ordinarily hold the moneys of their constituents. If no specific instructions are given at the time of payment or thereafter, and even if the money is held in a suspense account the bank does not thereby become a trustee for the amount paid.\nIn other words, when a person dealing with a bank delivers money to the Bank an intention to create a relation of creditor and debtor between him and the Bank is presumed, it being the normal course of the business of the Bank to accept deposits from its customers. But this presumption is one of fact arising from the nature of the business carried on by the Bank and is rebutted by proof of special instructions, or circumstances attending the transaction.\nWhere the money is paid to a bank with special instructions to retain the same pending further instructions\nor to pay over the same to another person who has no banking account with the bank and the bank accepts the instructions and holds the money pending instructions from that other person\nor where instructions are given by a customer to his banker that a part of the amount lying in his account be forwarded to another bank to meet a bill to become due and payable by him and the amount is sent by the banker as directed\na trust results and the presumption which ordinarily arises by reason of payment of the money to the bank is rebutted\nThe Bank charged no commission or remuneration for transmitting the amount to Calcutta, but that, in our judgment, is a circumstance which permits of no inference against the plaintiff.\nUndoubtedly, when the amount was delivered to the Bank by the plaintiff it was his intention to open fixed deposit account in Calcutta with the Banks branch but the fixed deposit accounts were to be opened after instructions were received. \nThe transaction, as evidenced by the two receipts, was primarily one of entrustment of the amount to the Bank for transmission to Calcutta. After the purpose for which the moneys were entrusted was carried out, in the absence of further instructions the defendant did not cease to be a trustee. So long as instructions were not given by the plaintiff for appropriation of the amounts the Bank continued to hold the amounts transmitted for and on behalf of the plaintiff and there is no evidence that the plaintiff gave instructions or acquiesced in the opening of a fixed deposit account after the same reached Calcutta.\nIt is immaterial that the Bank purported to open fixed deposit account in the name of the plaintiff with the amounts received at its head office at Lahore. That course of action was adopted without the consent of the plaintiff and it could not bind the plaintiff.\nThe High Court was, therefore, right in holding that the amount delivered by the plaintiff to the Bank at Lahore remained in trust even after it reached Calcutta, and it was not held by the Bank, in deposit for the plaintiff within the meaning of the scheme sanctioned by the High Court of East Punjab", + "expert_4": "Justice Bachawat of the High Court of Judicature at Calcutta decreed Suit No. 1039 of 1948 filed by one Pearey Lal-hereinafter called the plaintiff-for a decree for Rs. 1,35,000/- with interest against the New Bank of India Ltd.\nThe appeal of the Bank against the decree was dismissed by a Division Bench of the High Court.\nWith special leave the Bank has appealed to this Court.\nIn view of the impending partition, the plaintiff was anxious to transfer his moveable property outside the territory it was apprehended would be included in Pakistan, and he gave instructions for transferring his accounts with the Bank to its other branches in India.\nHe also paid an amount of Rs. 1,25,000/- on July 18, 1947, into the Bank at Lahore with instructions to transmit the same the to Bank branch at Calcutta which it then proposed to open in the near future. An amount of Rs. 10,000/- was also paid into the Bank at Lahore on July 19, 1947, with similar instructions.\nIn respect of these two transactions the Bank executed receipts which are set out below Received the sum of Rs. 1,25,000/- (Rs. One Lac twenty five thousand) only from Mr. Pearey Lal on account of amount to be remitted to Calcutta branch for preparing various F.D.\nThe two amounts were transmitted by the Bank to Calcutta.\nA branch of the Bank was opened at Calcutta on September 24, 1947, but within a few days thereafter the Bank ceased making payments.\nOn March 24, 1948 the plaintiff commenced an action against the Bank inter alia for a decree of Rs. 1,35,000/- in the Calcutta High Court on its original side.\nDuring the pendency of the suit the High Court of East Punjab sanctioned a scheme for arrangement under ss. 153 and 153A of the Indian Companies Act, 1913, for settlement of the liability of the Bank.\nIt was directed by the scheme, as it finally emerged, that the depositors were to be paid 701/2 of the deposits held by them and to he allotted shares of the face value of 5 of the deposits.\nThe plaintiff claimed by his suit that he had entrusted to the Bank at its registered office at Lahore Rs. 1,35,000/- on July 18 and 19, 1947, with instructions to transmit the same to the branch of the Bank which it proposed to open at Calcutta and to hold the amount subject to further instructions to be given by him when he would call personally at the branch at Calcutta on or after the opening date, that prior to the opening of the said Calcutta Branch the plaintiff countermanded his instructions on or about September 13, 1947 and demanded at Lahore that it be returned, but the Bank wrongfully claimed to have remitted the two sums to its Calcutta Branch and to have kept the same in a fixed deposit account in the name of the plaintiff, even though the plaintiff, had opened no such account at the Calcutta Branch and had given no instructions to put the same into any account by way of fixed deposit or otherwise.\nThe plaintiff, accordingly, claimed that the Bank was a trustee for transmission of the amount and in the absence of any instructions given by him for opening a fixed deposit account, in respect of the amount transmitted the Bank stood qua the plaintiff in a fiduciary relation and was liable to refund the full amount.\nThe Bank submitted that the amount of Rs. 1,35,000/- was deposited by the plaintiff at its head office at Lahore for the purpose of opening a fixed deposit account in the name of the plaintiff upon the terms that the fixed deposit would carry interest as on the respective dates of the deposits, that it was agreed that the plaintiff would be allowed to take loans upto 90 of the deposit at a rate of interest of half percent above the current fixed deposit rates and that the amount would be transmitted to the Calcutta Branch of the Bank for the purpose of crediting the same to the fixed deposit account of the plaintiff.\nThe Bank denied the alleged instructions in September, 1947, countermanding the original arrangement and contended that the plaintiff was bound by the scheme of arrangement sanctioned by the High Court of East Punjab.\nA decree on admission was passed against the Bank for Rs. 81,000/- and the suit was contested by the Bank for the balance of the claim.\nThe trial Court held that even though the plaintiff failed to prove the instructions in the month of September, 1947, set up by him countermanding transmission, it was established on the evidence, that the plaintiff had entrusted to the Bank Rs. 1,35,000/- for transmission and the plaintiff having given no further instructions, the Bank held the amount as trustee for the plaintiff and that the plaintiffs claim was not liable to be reduced under the scheme sanctioned by the High Court of East Punjab.\nThe Court also negatived the plea of the Bank that the amount of Rs. 1,35,000/- was deposited with the Bank at Lahore for opening a fixed deposit account subject to the conditions which the Bank set up.\nThe finding of the trial Court were confirmed, in appeal, by a Division Bench of the High Court at Calcutta.\nThe facts found proved, according to the findings of the trial Court and confirmed by the High Court are therefore that the plaintiff delivered an amount of Rs. 1,25,000/- on July 19, 1947, and Rs. 10,000/- on July 19, 1947, to the Bank at Lahore for transmission to Calcutta, with instructions to await the directions of the plaintiff regarding the opening of accounts for keeping the same in fixed deposit or otherwise in the Calcutta Branch of the Bank, and the plaintiff never gave instructions for opening any account, fixed deposit or otherwise, in regard to the amounts after they reached Calcutta.\nDelivery of the amount for transmission to the Bank created ex facie a relationship of a fiduciary character.\nBut counsel for the Bank contends that when the amount was handed over at Lahore to the Bank by the plaintiff who was an old constituent of the Bank it must be presumed that a relationship of debtor and creditor arose and by the addition of instructions for transmissions of the amount to another branch the relationship of trustee and cestuique-trust did not arise.\nHe submitted that the contention that the relation between the plaintiff and the Bank was of creditor and debtor was supported by three important circumstances (1) that the Bank agreed to pay interest on the amount delivered by the plaintiff (2) that the Bank charged no commission or remuneration for transmission of the amount and (3) that even on the plaintiffs case the amount was to be utilized for opening fixed deposit accounts at Calcutta.\nIn other words, when a person dealing with a bank delivers money to the Bank an intention to create a relation of creditor and debtor between him and the Bank is presumed, it being the normal course of the business of the Bank to accept deposits from its customers.\nBut this presumption is one of fact arising from the nature of the business carried on by the Bank and is rebutted by proof of special instructions, or circumstances attending the transaction.\nWhere the money is paid to a bank with special instructions to retain the same pending further instructions (The Official Assignee, Madras v. Natesam Pillai (1)) or to pay over the same to another person who has no banking account with the bank and the bank accepts the instructions and holds the money pending instructions from that other person (Arbuthnot Co. v. D.\nRajam Ayyar (2)), or where instructions are given by a customer to his banker that a part of the amount lying in his account be forwarded to another bank to meet a bill to become due and payable by him and the amount is sent by the banker as directed (Farley v.\nTurner (3)), a trust results and the presumption which ordinarily arises by reason of payment of the money to the bank is rebutted.\nIt is not necessary in this appeal to consider whether because of an agreement to pay interest the relationship may be deemed to be of debtor and creditor, because it was held by both the courts below that no such agreement is proved, and according to the settled practice of this court the finding is regarded a binding.\nThe Bank charged no commission or remuneration for transmitting the amount to Calcutta, but that, in our judgment, is a circumstance which permits of no inference against the plaintiff.\nUndoubtedly, when the amount was delivered to the Bank by the plaintiff it was his intention to open fixed deposit account in Calcutta with the Banks branch but the fixed deposit accounts were to be opened after instructions were received. \nThe transaction, as evidenced by the two receipts, was primarily one of entrustment of the amount to the Bank for transmission to Calcutta.\nAfter the purpose for which the moneys were entrusted was carried out, in the absence of further instructions the defendant did not cease to be a trustee.\nSo long as instructions were not given by the plaintiff for appropriation of the amounts the Bank continued to hold the amounts transmitted for and on behalf of the plaintiff and there is no evidence that the plaintiff gave instructions or acquiesced in the opening of a fixed deposit account after the same reached Calcutta.\nIt is immaterial that the Bank purported to open fixed deposit account in the name of the plaintiff with the amounts received at its head office at Lahore.\nThat course of action was adopted without the consent of the plaintiff and it could not bind the plaintiff.\nThe High Court was, therefore, right in holding that the amount delivered by the plaintiff to the Bank at Lahore remained in trust even after it reached Calcutta, and it was not held by the Bank, in deposit for the plaintiff within the meaning of the scheme sanctioned by the High Court of East Punjab.", + "expert_5": "with instructions to transmit the same the to Bank branch at Calcutta which it then proposed to open in the near future.\nsimilar instructions.\non account of amount to be remitted to Calcutta branch for preparing various F.D.\nReceipts subject to his instructions on or after the opening date when he would call upon them personally.\nfor making up various F. D.\nReceipts at his instance when he calls upon them personally on or after the opening date of the Branch.\nto hold the amount subject to further instructions to be given by him when he would call personally at the branch at Calcutta on or after the opening date, that prior to the opening of the said Calcutta Branch the plaintiff countermanded his instructions on or about September 13, 1947 and demanded at Lahore that it be returned,\nthat prior to the opening of the said Calcutta Branch the plaintiff countermanded his instructions on or about September 13, 1947 and demanded at Lahore that it be returned\neven though the plaintiff, had opened no such account at the Calcutta Branch and had given no instructions to put the same into any account by way of fixed deposit or otherwise.\nfor the purpose of opening a fixed deposit account in the name of the plaintiff\nthe fixed deposit would carry interest as on the respective dates of the deposits, that it was agreed that the plaintiff would be allowed to take loans upto 90 of the deposit at a rate of interest of half percent above the current fixed deposit rates\nthe plaintiff had entrusted to the Bank Rs. 1,35,000/- for transmission and the plaintiff having given no further instructions, the Bank held the amount as trustee for the plaintiff\nThe finding of the trial Court were confirmed, in appeal, by a Division Bench of the High Court at Calcutta.\nThe facts found proved, according to the findings of the trial Court and confirmed by the High Court are therefore that the plaintiff delivered an amount of Rs. 1,25,000/- on July 19, 1947, and Rs. 10,000/- on July 19, 1947, to the Bank at Lahore for transmission to Calcutta, with instructions to await the directions of the plaintiff regarding the opening of accounts for keeping the same in fixed deposit or otherwise in the Calcutta Branch of the Bank, and the plaintiff never gave instructions for opening any account, fixed deposit or otherwise, in regard to the amounts after they reached Calcutta.\nIt is true that in the absence of other evidence a person paying money into a Bank, whether he is a constituent of the Bank or not, may be presumed to have paid the money to be held as bankers ordinarily hold the moneys of their constituents. If no specific instructions are given at the time of payment or thereafter, and even if the money is held in a suspense account the bank does not thereby become a trustee for the amount paid. In other words, when a person dealing with a bank delivers money to the Bank an intention to create a relation of creditor and debtor between him and the Bank is presumed, it being the normal course of the business of the Bank to accept deposits from its customers.\nBut this presumption is one of fact arising from the nature of the business carried on by the Bank and is rebutted by proof of special instructions, or circumstances attending the transaction.\nWhere the money is paid to a bank with special instructions to retain the same pending further instructions (The Official Assignee, Madras v. Natesam Pillai (1)) or to pay over the same to another person who has no banking account with the bank and the bank accepts the instructions and holds the money pending instructions from that other person (Arbuthnot Co. v. D. Rajam Ayyar (2)), or where instructions are given by a customer to his banker that a part of the amount lying in his account be forwarded to another bank to meet a bill to become due and payable by him and the amount is sent by the banker as directed (Farley v. Turner (3)), a trust results and the presumption which ordinarily arises by reason of payment of the money to the bank is rebutted.\nIt is not necessary in this appeal to consider whether because of an agreement to pay interest the relationship may be deemed to be of debtor and creditor, because it was held by both the courts below that no such agreement is proved, and according to the settled practice of this court the finding is regarded a binding.\nThe Bank charged no commission or remuneration for transmitting the amount to Calcutta, but that, in our judgment, is a circumstance which permits of no inference against the plaintiff.\nUndoubtedly, when the amount was delivered to the Bank by the plaintiff it was his intention to open fixed deposit account in Calcutta with the Banks branch\nbut the fixed deposit accounts were to be opened after instructions were received.\nThe transaction, as evidenced by the two receipts, was primarily one of entrustment of the amount to the Bank for transmission to Calcutta.\nin the absence of further instructions the defendant did not cease to be a trustee.\nSo long as instructions were not given by the plaintiff for appropriation of the amounts the Bank continued to hold the amounts transmitted for and on behalf of the plaintiff and there is no evidence that the plaintiff gave instructions or acquiesced in the opening of a fixed deposit account after the same reached Calcutta.\nThat course of action was adopted without the consent of the plaintiff and it could not bind the plaintiff." + }, + "1961_363": { + "expert_1": "Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated April 17, 1961 of the Calcutta High Court in Appeal from Original Order No. 132 of 1960.\nThe appellant contended that the order made by Mr. Justice Mitter on January 18, 1960, was obtained by suppression of material facts and that, in any event, the order made without notice to the appellant was vexatious and oppressive and amounted to an abuse of the process of Court. He submitted that he was a Director of the Company between the years 1939 to 1953 and had attended meetings of the Board of Directors of the Company and without reference to the records of the meetings of the Board and particularly without reference to the Minute Books, it was not possible for him to recollect any details as to transactions which might have taken place in the Boards meetings. He stated that he was not concerned with the administration, management or the day to day working of the Company, except to the extent of taking part in the Boards meetings, that he never had in his custody the books referred to in the order and that the official liquidator had never asked for or enquired of him about any documents, that he was not aware of the matters on which information was required by the official liquidator and unless those matters were made known to him, it was not possible for him, to answer questions or to give information required of him, that to enable him to answer questions or supply information, it was necessary for him to know the nature of the enquiry and the charges and to inspect the records and documents of the Company and without the assistance of such records and documents his proposed examination would be highly oppressive and harsh and was likely to prove futile. The official liquidator submitted that all the available papers in the books with the liquidator will be made available at the time of the examination of the appellant but he-the official liquidator-was not bound to give information in advance about the nature of the enquiry to do so, he contended, would defeat the purpose of the enquiry. He also submitted that the appellant had no right claim inspection or to obtain copies of the statement which accompanied the judges summons dated January 18, 1960. Mr. Justice Law rejected the application filed by the appellant, holding that the order dated January 18, 1960, was final and that he had no power to review, modify, alter or vary the same, that the order merely summoning for examination under s. 477 of the Companies Act did not affect a partys rights, there being no charge, no complaint and no allegation against him. The learned Judge observed that it was not necessary for the Court in the first instance to determine that the person called upon to furnish information actually possessed that information if the Court has reasons to think, or if even an allegation is made that a certain person is in possession of information which would be of use in the course of winding up, the Court can call upon him to appear in Court and examine him, and that rr. 243 (1) and 243 (2) of Companies (Court) Rules laid down the same procedure as was laid down in In re Gold Company (1879 12 Ch. D. 77 at page 82) and different from the procedure which was laid by r. 195 of the Indian Companies Act, 1913. In the view of the learned Judge the statement of the official liquidator on which the order dated January 18, 1960, was made not being on oath or affirmation was not legal evidence and did not form part of the proceedings of the Court and the appellant could not demand facility for inspection of the statement or copy thereof. Against the order of Mr. Justice Law an appeal was preferred to a Division Bench of the High Court. The High Court held that the order having been initially pass ex parte an application for discharging or modifying the order was in law maintainable at the instance of the appellant but the order in so far as it directed the appellant who was a director of the Company to appear before the Court to be examined touching upon the affairs of the Company was, in the circumstances of the case, desirable and necessary, and that the statement of the official liquidator on which the order dated January 18, 1960, was issued not being an affidavit was not required by the Companies (Court) Rules 1959 to be kept on the file of the liquidation proceedings the statement was a confidential document and was-save by order of the Court-not open to inspection of any person other than the liquidator. The learned judges modified the order in so far as it directed production of the books of account relating to the Ballygunge Estate (Private) Ltd. and the Ballygunge Building Society Private Ltd., because those companies were not parties to the liquidation proceedings. Against the order of the High Court this appeal with special leave has been preferred to this Court.\nThree questions fall to be determined \n Whether an ex parte order directing the examination of a person under s. 477 of the Indian Companies Act, 1956 is liable to be modified, or vacated on the application of the persons affected thereby \n Whether there is any ground for discharging or modifying the order dated January 18, 1960 and \n Whether the appellant is entitled before his examination to inspect the statement submitted by the official liquidator in support of the application for the order dated January 18, 1960, or to be furnished with a copy thereof.\nThe primary test for making the order is whether it is just and beneficial to the business of the company, But the power conferred by the section is very wide and the Court must guard itself against being made an instrument of vexation or oppression. The order which is made ex-parte is not final it is always open to a person summoned to apply for vacating or modifying the order on the ground that it has been obtained without placing all the requisite materials before the Court or by mis-statement of facts or on other adequate grounds.\nIt is a power of an inquisitorial kind which enables the Court to direct to be examined-not merely before itself, but before the examiner appointed by the Court-some third person who is no party to a litigation. That is an inquisitorial power, which may work with great severity against third persons, and it seems to me to be obvious that such a section ought to be used with the greatest care, so as not unnecessarily put in motion the machinery of justice when it is not wanted or to put it in motion at a stage when it is not clear that it is wanted, and certainly not to put it is motion if unnecessary mischief is going to be done or hardship inflicted upon the third person who is called upon to appear and give information.\nThe Court has therefore jurisdiction in proper cases, i.e. where it is satisfied that the order is vexatious, or oppressive, or where other adequate grounds exist to discharge the same. In our view, the High Court was right in holding that in a proper case it would be open to the Company Judge to vacate an ex-parte order obtained under r. 243 of the Companies (Court) Rules. The jurisdiction to vacate or modify an ex- parte order under r. 243 being granted, the question which falls to be determined is whether the order passed by Mr. Justice Mitter was oppressive or vexatious or otherwise liable to be vacated or modified for adequate grounds. In our view, there is no ground for holding that the order is liable to be vacated or modified. It was never even suggested in the High Court that the order for examination was per se oppressive or vexatious. This is not a case in which the order is sought to facilitate the progress of an action filed by the official liquidator against the appellant, nor is there reason to hold that the order is sought in aid of some collateral purpose-a purpose other than effective progress of the winding up in the interest of the company.\nMr. Justice Mitter was satisfied on the statement filed by the official liquidator that the appellant had the custody of certain important books of the company. The plea of the appellant that compelling him to submit to examination without permitting him to have access to the books before answering questions put to him is oppressive has no substance. The affidavit filed on behalf of the liquidator clearly states that the relevant records of the company will be made available to the appellant at the time of the examination. The High Court, in appeal, expressed the view that on the merits there was no ground for interference and it was satisfied that it was desirable and necessary that the appellant as a director should be examined. The appellant having been a director of the company during the period when it is alleged the affairs were mismanaged, is likely to be aware of the management and in possession of information conducive to effective prosecution of the winding up and if the learned Judge thought it fit to order that the appellant be examined the order cannot be regarded as either vexatious or oppressive or otherwise liable to be set aside.\nIt was never suggested before the High Court that the order was made without considering the material facts and circumstances. The Court has made the order in exercise of the jurisdiction vested in it and in the absence of any material to show that the order was made for a collateral purpose or by the misleading the Court, the appellant is not entitled to have the order vacated.\nWe must recollect also that it is not necessary to make out a prima facie case-the probability of a case is enough. A fair suspicion may be well worthy of further investigation, and it may well be worth the expense and trouble of examining witnesses to see whether it is well founded. It is not necessary that the applicant should establish his case before he applies to the Judge he may say to the Judge, I have a strong ground for suspecting that a certain transaction was fraudulent if it is proved to be so we shall get a large some of money will you let me lay out a small sum of money in order to examine a witness or two, so as to ascertain the facts? In that case the Court will exercise a discretion.\nThis Court cannot proceed upon an assumption that the order for examination of a person who has ceased to be a director prior to the date of the winding up must necessarily be regarded as oppressive or vexatious. A director of a company, past or present, is ordinarily in a position to give useful information about the affairs of the Company in winding up.\nIn the circumstances, we think that the High Court was right in holding that no case was made out for modification of the ex parte order.\nAn application by an official liquidator is required to be supported by a statement signed by him, but the rule does not contemplate any notice to the parties likely to be affected by the issue of the summons. The proceedings are intended to be confidential.\nThis practice in our judgement is consonant with right and justice. That proceedings for examination of officers and other persons are confidential is emphasised by rr. 247 and 248.\nThere is nothing in the scheme of the Act which indicates that an order passed for the examination of a person under. s. 477 may be made only after serving a notice upon such person the Rules expressly contemplate that the order may be made ex parte. Rules of natural justice are therefore not violated merely by the issue of an order requiring a person or persons to appear before a Court for his examination under s. 477.\nNor do the rules of procedure framed by this Court for examination under s. 477 contemplate and right of inspection of the statement of the official liquidator.\nAs we have already pointed out, r. 243 contemplates an order ex parte and the scheme of the Rule further emphasises the fact that all these enquiries are intended as already discussed to be confidential proceedings. The person whose examination is sought to be held, has therefore no right to inspect the statement made by the liquidator on which the order of the Court proceeds.\nThe right to inspection is given in respect of the file of the proceedings of the liquidation. But the statement made by the official liquidator under Rule 243 does not form part of the file of the proceedings of the liquidation. The statement is not to be made on oath it has to be shown to the Company Judge and the Judge has to apply his mind to the contents thereof, but it does not, as pointed out by Mr. Justice Law, form part of the liquidation proceedings. In the Company (Court) Rules, there is no rule specifying the documents which are to be included in the file of the liquidation proceedings. The order passed by the Court and the summons issued thereon may be regarded as forming part of the file of the proceeding of liquidation, but having regard to the nature of the statement made by the official liquidator on which this Judges order is passed, it is not part of the file of the proceedings of liquidation. \nThe person summoned even if he is an officer or director of the company, is therefore not entitled to inspection thereof relying upon Rule 360.\nIt appears that the practice of the Calcutta High Court, prior to the promulgation of the Companies (Court) Rules, was different. Under r. 195 an application for examination of a person under s 195 of the Indian Companies Act 1913, could be made ex parte to the Judge but it had to be by petition verified by the official liquidator stating the facts upon which the application was based. It was also provided that at the hearing, the Judge may, if satisfied that a prima facie case for examination had been made out, direct the issue of a summons or summonses against the person or persons named in the order for examination and or for the production of the documents. Manifestly, the order could be obtained on a petition which was required to be verified by the official liquidator and there had to be a formal hearing and only if a prima facie case for hearing had been made out the order could be made. Under the Companies (Court) Rules a different practice, which approaches the practice prevailing in the English Courts has been set up.\nThe mere fact that under r. 195 of the Calcutta High Court Rules under Act of 1913 the appellant might have had a right of access to the statement on which the order was founded will not be an adequate ground for holding that the earlier practice must continue to prevail. If the appellant is not entitled to inspection of the statement he would certainly, for the same reason, not be entitled to a copy of that statement.", + "expert_2": "Ballygunge Real Property and Building Society Ltd.-hereinafter called the Company-was on January 8, 1958, ordered by the High Court of Judicature at Calcutta to be wound up. On January 18, 1960, the Official Liquidator submitted an application accompanied by a signed statement for an order that the appellant be examined under s. 477 of the Indian Companies Act, 1956.\nthe appellant was served with the order to attend the Court on March 22, 1960, for the purpose of being examined concerning the affairs of the company, and to bring with him and produce at the said time and place the following books and papers, mentioned in Schedule B to the order\nThe appellant contended that the order made by Mr. Justice Mitter on January 18, 1960, was obtained by suppression of material facts and that, in any event, the order made without notice to the appellant was vexatious and oppressive and amounted to an abuse of the process of Court. He submitted that he was a Director of the Company between the years 1939 to 1953 and had attended meetings of the Board of Directors of the Company and without reference to the records of the meetings of the Board and particularly without reference to the Minute Books, it was not possible for him to recollect any details as to transactions which might have taken place in the Boards meetings. He stated that he was not concerned with the administration, management or the day to day working of the Company, except to the extent of taking part in the Boards meetings, that he never had in his custody the books referred to in the order and that the official liquidator had never asked for or enquired of him about any documents, that he was not aware of the matters on which information was required by the official liquidator and unless those matters were made known to him, it was not possible for him, to answer questions or to give information required of him, that to enable him to answer questions or supply information, it was necessary for him to know the nature of the enquiry and the charges and to inspect the records and documents of the Company and without the assistance of such records and documents his proposed examination would be highly oppressive and harsh and was likely to prove futile.\nThree questions fall to be determined \n Whether an ex parte order directing the examination of a person under s. 477 of the Indian Companies Act, 1956 is liable to be modified, or vacated on the application of the persons affected thereby \n Whether there is any ground for discharging or modifying the order dated January 18, 1960 and \n Whether the appellant is entitled before his examination to inspect the statement submitted by the official liquidator in support of the application for the order dated January 18, 1960, or to be furnished with a copy thereof.\nBy r. 243 an application for an order for examination may be made ex parte, and the Company Judge may, if he is satisfied that the interest of the company will be served by the examination of a person-be he an officer of the company or other person make the order. The primary test for making the order is whether it is just and beneficial to the business of the company, But the power conferred by the section is very wide and the Court must guard itself against being made an instrument of vexation or oppression\nThe order which is made ex-parte is not final it is always open to a person summoned to apply for vacating or modifying the order on the ground that it has been obtained without placing all the requisite materials before the Court or by mis-statement of facts or on other adequate grounds. Rule 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules preserves to the Court its inherent powers to give such directions or pass such orders as may be necessary for the ends of justice or to prevent abuse of the process of Court, and a direction to vacate an order previously made, is in a proper case within the Courts inherent jurisdiction.\nThat is an inquisitorial power, which may work with great severity against third persons, and it seems to me to be obvious that such a section ought to be used with the greatest care, so as not unnecessarily put in motion the machinery of justice when it is not wanted or to put it in motion at a stage when it is not clear that it is wanted, and certainly not to put it is motion if unnecessary mischief is going to be done or hardship inflicted upon the third person who is called upon to appear and give information.\nThe Court has therefore jurisdiction in proper cases, i.e. where it is satisfied that the order is vexatious, or oppressive, or where other adequate grounds exist to discharge the same. In our view, the High Court was right in holding that in a proper case it would be open to the Company Judge to vacate an ex-parte order obtained under r. 243 of the Companies (Court) Rules. The jurisdiction to vacate or modify an ex- parte order under r. 243 being granted, the question which falls to be determined is whether the order passed by Mr. Justice Mitter was oppressive or vexatious or otherwise liable to be vacated or modified for adequate grounds. In our view, there is no ground for holding that the order is liable to be vacated or modified.\nThe appellant was for many years a director of the company, and therefore concerned with guiding the affairs of the company. He was prima facie a person who would be able to give information likely to promote the purpose of the winding up. It appears also that Mr. Justice Mitter was satisfied on the statement filed by the official liquidator that the appellant had the custody of certain important books of the company.\nIt was never suggested before the High Court that the order was made without considering the material facts and circumstances. The Court has made the order in exercise of the jurisdiction vested in it and in the absence of any material to show that the order was made for a collateral purpose or by the misleading the Court, the appellant is not entitled to have the order vacated.\nWe must recollect also that it is not necessary to make out a prima facie case-the probability of a case is enough. A fair suspicion may be well worthy of further investigation, and it may well be worth the expense and trouble of examining witnesses to see whether it is well founded. It is not necessary that the applicant should establish his case before he applies to the Judge he may say to the Judge, I have a strong ground for suspecting that a certain transaction was fraudulent if it is proved to be so we shall get a large some of money will you let me lay out a small sum of money in order to examine a witness or two, so as to ascertain the facts? In that case the Court will exercise a discretion.\nBefore him a statement of the official liquidator was produced and in the light of the materials placed before him, he passed the order which is now sought to be modified. This Court cannot proceed upon an assumption that the order for examination of a person who has ceased to be a director prior to the date of the winding up must necessarily be regarded as oppressive or vexatious. A director of a company, past or present, is ordinarily in a position to give useful information about the affairs of the Company in winding up\nIn the circumstances, we think that the High Court was right in holding that no case was made out for modification of the ex parte order.\nTwo grounds were set up in support of the plea that the appellant before he is examined is entitled to inspect the statement of the official liquidator (a) that it is contrary to rules of natural justice to disallow inspection of the statement on which a judicial order imposing an obligation upon a party is made, and (b) that the rules of procedure prescribed under the Companies (Court) Rules authorise the person summoned to inspect the statement of the official liquidator on which the order is made.\nRule 243 expressly contemplates that an application for examination under s. 477 may be made ex parte. An application by an official liquidator is required to be supported by a statement signed by him, but the rule does not contemplate any notice to the parties likely to be affected by the issue of the summons. The proceedings are intended to be confidential.\nAs observed in In re Gold Company (1) by Sir George Jessel R in these mattersthe object being to keep the proceedings secret from the person sought to be affected, and the practice is, and as far as I know always has been, that the liquidator, instead of making an affidavit, simply makes a written statement which he leaves with the Chief Clerk, who thereupon issues an order, and the written statement cannot, be got at by anybody whereas an affidavit can. This practice in our judgement is consonant with right and justice. That proceedings for examination of officers and other persons are confidential is emphasised by rr. 247 and 248.\nThe proceedings for examination under s. 477 being intended to be commenced only in the interest of the Company and for the purpose of collecting evidence for the effective prosecution of the liquidation are by rules expressly to be commenced by order which may on the application of the official liquidator be made ex parte. The order does not purport to decide any question in dispute between the Company and the persons sought to be examined.\nRules of natural justice are therefore not violated merely by the issue of an order requiring a person or persons to appear before a Court for his examination under s. 477. Nor do the rules of procedure framed by this Court for examination under s. 477 contemplate and right of inspection of the statement of the official liquidator.\nRule 360 of the Companies (Court) Rules provides that every duly authorised officer of a the Central Government, and, save as otherwise provided by these Rules, every persons who has been a director or officer of a company which is being wound up, shall be entitled, free of charge, at all reasonable times to inspect the file of proceedings of the liquidation and to take copies or extracts from any document therein, and, on payment of the prescribed charges to be furnished with such copies or extracts. The right to inspection is given in respect of the file of the proceedings of the liquidation. But the statement made by the official liquidator under Rule 243 does not form part of the file of the proceedings of the liquidation.\nIt was urged by counsel for the appellant that the petition for an order under s.477 was inexorably connected with the statement of the official liquidator, and if the party affected by the order was entitled to inspect the petition, he was entitled to inspect the statement which formed part of the petition. There is however, no warrant for the view that the petition and the statement form part of the same document. The petition has, it is true, to be supported by a statement, but the statement is independent of the petition.\nIf the appellant is not entitled to inspection of the statement he would certainly, for the same reason, not be entitled to a copy of that statement.", + "expert_3": "Ballygunge Real Property and Building Society Ltd.-hereinafter called the Company-was on January 8, 1958, ordered by the High Court of Judicature at Calcutta to be wound up. On January 18, 1960, the Official Liquidator submitted an application accompanied by a signed statement for an order that the appellant be examined under s. 477 of the Indian Companies Act, 1956. This application was granted ex-parte by Mr. Justice \n K. Mitter on January 18, 1960, and the appellant was served with the order to attend the Court on March 22, 1960, for the purpose of being examined concerning the affairs of the company, and to bring with him and produce at the said time and place the following books and papers, mentioned in Schedule B to the order, viz., \n Ballygunge Estate (Private) Ltd.-Cash Books, General Ledger, Journal, Minutes Books from 1939 to 1948, Property Register\nBallygunge Building Society Private Ltd.- Cash Books, General Ledger, Journal, Minute Books, Property Register. Ballygunge Real Property Building Society Ltd. (In liquidation)-General Ledger for 1949, and all such other books, papers, deeds, writings and other documents in his custody or power in any way relating to the affairs of the Company\nThe solicitors of the appellant by letters dated February 29, 1960, and March 10, 1960, called upon the Official Liquidator to furnish them with copies of the petition and the report on the basis of which the order was made. The Official Liquidator having informed the solicitors of the appellant that the latter were not entitled to a copy of the report of the official liquidator, the appellant applied by a judges summons for an order recalling vacating, setting aside or modifying the order dated January 18, 1960, and for a direction to the official liquidator requiring him to supply copies of the report of the official liquidator and of the other documents relating to the application and alternatively for an order granting leave to inspect the court records and proceedings of the application and to take copies thereof\nJustice Law rejected the application filed by the appellant, holding that the order dated January 18, 1960, was final and that he had no power to review, modify, alter or vary the same, that the order merely summoning for examination under s. 477 of the Companies Act did not affect a partys rights, there being no charge, no complaint and no allegation against him\nThe learned Judge observed that it was not necessary for the Court in the first instance to determine that the person called upon to furnish information actually possessed that information if the Court has reasons to think, or if even an allegation is made that a certain person is in possession of information which would be of use in the course of winding up, the Court can call upon him to appear in Court and examine him, and that rr. 243 (1) and 243 (2) of Companies (Court) Rules laid down the same procedure as was laid down in In re Gold Company (1879 12 Ch.\nand different from the procedure which was laid by r. 195 of the Indian Companies Act, 1913. In the view of the learned Judge the statement of the official liquidator on which the order dated January 18, 1960, was made not being on oath or affirmation was not legal evidence and did not form part of the proceedings of the Court and the appellant could not demand facility for inspection of the statement or copy thereof.\nAgainst the order of Mr. Justice Law an appeal was preferred to a Division Bench of the High Court\nThe High Court held that the order having been initially pass ex parte an application for discharging or modifying the order was in law maintainable at the instance of the appellant but the order in so far as it directed the appellant who was a director of the Company to appear before the Court to be examined touching upon the affairs of the Company was, in the circumstances of the case, desirable and necessary, and that the statement of the official liquidator on which the order dated January 18, 1960, was issued not being an affidavit was not required by the Companies (Court) Rules 1959 to be kept on the file of the liquidation proceedings the statement was a confidential document and was-save by order of the Court-not open to inspection of any person other than the liquidator. The learned judges modified the order in so far as it directed production of the books of account relating to the Ballygunge Estate (Private) Ltd. and the Ballygunge Building Society Private Ltd., because those companies were not parties to the liquidation proceedings\nAgainst the order of the High Court this appeal with special leave has been preferred to this Court\nThree questions fall to be determined \n Whether an ex parte order directing the examination of a person under s. 477 of the Indian Companies Act, 1956 is liable to be modified, or vacated on the application of the persons affected thereby \n Whether there is any ground for discharging or modifying the order dated January 18, 1960 and \n Whether the appellant is entitled before his examination to inspect the statement submitted by the official liquidator in support of the application for the order dated January 18, 1960, or to be furnished with a copy thereof\nSection 477 of the Indian Companies Act, 1956, provides 477 (1) The Court may, at any time after the appointment of a provisional liquidator or the making of a winding up order summon before it any officer of the company or person known or suspected to have in his possession any property or books or papers of the company, or known or suspected to be indebted to the company, or any person whom the Court deems capable of giving information concerning the promotion, formation, trade, dealings, property, books or papers, or affairs of the company. The Court may examine any officer or person so summoned on oath concerning the matters aforesaid, either by word of mouth or on written interrogatories and may, in the former case, reduce his answers to writing and require him to sign them. The Court may require any officer or person so summoned to produce any books and papers in his custody or power relating to the company but, where he claims any lien on books or papers, produced by him, the production shall be without prejudice to that lien, and the Court shall have jurisdiction in the winding up to determine all questions relating to that lien. If any officer or person so summoned, after being paid or tendered a reasonable sum for his expenses, fails to appear before the Court at the time appointed, not having a lawful impediment (made known to the Court at the time of its sitting and allowed by it), the Court may cause him to be apprehended and brought before the Court for examination\nIf, on his examination, any officer or person so summoned admits that he is indebted to the company, the Court may order him to pay to the provisional liquidator or, as the case may be, the liquidator at such time and in such manner as to the Court may seem just the amount in which he is indebted, or any part thereof, either in full discharge of the whole amount or not, as the Court thinks fit, with or without costs of the examination\nIf, on his examination, any such officer or person admits that he has in his possession any property belonging to the company, the Court may order him to deliver to the provisional liquidator or, as the case may be, the liquidator, that property or any part thereof, at such time, in such manner and on such terms as to the Court may seem just. Orders made under sub-sections (5) and (6) shall be executed in the same manner as decrees for the payment of money or for delivery of property under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 respectively. Any person making any payment or delivery in pursuance of an order made under subsection (5) or sub-section (6) shall by such payment or delivery be, unless otherwise directed by such order, discharged from all liability whatsoever in respect of such debt or property.\nClauses (5), (6), (7) and (8) it may be noted, were inserted by Act 65 of 1960\nSection 463 of the Companies Act authorises this Court to make rules for all matters relating to winding up of companies which by the Act are to be prescribed and for other matters. This court has framed Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, out of which rr. 243, 244 and 249, which are material, are as follows - \n Application for examination under Section 477.-(1) An application for the examination of a person under Section 477 may be made ex parte provided that where the application is made by any person other than the Official Liquidator, notice of the application shall be given to the Official Liquidator. The summons shall be in Form 109 and, where the application is by the Official Liquidator, shall be accompanied by a statement signed by him setting forth the facts on which the application is based. Where the application is made by a person other than the Official Liquidator, the summons shall be supported by an affidavit of the applicant setting forth the matters in respect of which the examination is sought and the grounds relied on in support of the summons\nUpon the hearing of the summons the Judge may, if satisfied that there are grounds for making the orders, make an order directing the issue of summons against the person named in the order for his examination and or for the production of documents. Unless the Judge otherwise directs, the examination of such person shall be held in Chambers. The order shall be in Form No. 110. Order for public examination under section 478.-(1) where an order is made for the examination of any person or persons under Section 478, the examination shall be held before the Judge provided that in the case of High Court, the Judge may direct that the whole or any part of the examination of any such person or persons, be held before any of the officers mentioned in sub-section (10) of the said Section as may be mentioned in the order Where the date of the examination has not been fixed by the order, the Official Liquidator shall take an appointment from the Judge or officer before whom the examination is to be held as to the date of the examination. The order directing a public examination shall be in Form No. 112\nThe Judge may, if he things fit, either in the order for examination or by any subsequent order, give directions to the specific matters on which such person is to be examined. By s. 477 the Court is authorised to summon before it (1) any officer of the Company, (2) any person known or suspected to have in his possession any property or books or papers of the Company, and (3) any person known or suspected to be indebted to the company, or any person whom the Court deems capable of giving information concerning the promotion, formation, trade, dealings, property, books or papers or affairs of the company. By r. 243 an application for an order for examination may be made ex parte, and the Company Judge may, if he is satisfied that the interest of the company will be served by the examination of a person-be he an officer of the company or other person make the order\nThe primary test for making the order is whether it is just and beneficial to the business of the company, But the power conferred by the section is very wide and the Court must guard itself against being made an instrument of vexation or oppression. The order which is made ex-parte is not final it is always open to a person summoned to apply for vacating or modifying the order on the ground that it has been obtained without placing all the requisite materials before the Court or by mis-statement of facts or on other adequate grounds\nRule 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules preserves to the Court its inherent powers to give such directions or pass such orders as may be necessary for the ends of justice or to prevent abuse of the process of Court, and a direction to vacate an order previously made, is in a proper case within the Courts inherent jurisdiction. The relevant provisions of the English Companies Act, 1862 (25 26 Vict. c. 89), the English Companies Act, 1929 (19 20 Geo V c.3) and the English Companies Act, 1948 (11 12 Geo VI c,88) on the question relating to examination of officers of the company or other persons are substantially the same as s. 477 of the Indians Companies Act, 1956, and the principles laid down by the superior Courts in England, which have been assimilated in the practice of Company winding up by the Courts in India are useful in determining the nature of the proceeding. In re North Australian Territory Company (1), Lord Justice Cotton vacated an order in appeal where the order for examination was not made in the interest of the Company in liquidation, but was made with a view to assist the interest of the company in prosecuting an action which has been brought up by the liquidator\nLord Justice Bowen in that case observed that the power conferred by s. 115 is an extra-ordinary power. It is a power of an inquisitorial kind which enables the Court to direct to be examined-not merely before itself, but before the examiner appointed by the Court-some third person who is no party to a litigation. That is an inquisitorial power, which may work with great severity against third persons, and it seems to me to be obvious that such a section ought to be used with the greatest care, so as not unnecessarily put in motion the machinery of justice when it is not wanted or to put it in motion at a stage when it is not clear that it is wanted, and certainly not to put it is motion if unnecessary mischief is going to be done or hardship inflicted upon the third person who is called upon to appear and give information\nIt was held that the liquidator must satisfy the Court that it would be just and beneficial for the purposes of the winding up. The Court in that case held that the action of the liquidator was vexatious\nThe Court has therefore jurisdiction in proper cases, i.e. where it is satisfied that the order is vexatious, or oppressive, or where other adequate grounds exist to discharge the same\nIn our view, the High Court was right in holding that in a proper case it would be open to the Company Judge to vacate an ex-parte order obtained under r. 243 of the Companies (Court) Rules. The jurisdiction to vacate or modify an ex- parte order under r. 243 being granted, the question which falls to be determined is whether the order passed by Mr. Justice Mitter was oppressive or vexatious or otherwise liable to be vacated or modified for adequate grounds. In our view, there is no ground for holding that the order is liable to be vacated or modified\nIt was never even suggested in the High Court that the order for examination was per se oppressive or vexatious. This is not a case in which the order is sought to facilitate the progress of an action filed by the official liquidator against the appellant, nor is there reason to hold that the order is sought in aid of some collateral purpose-a purpose other than effective progress of the winding up in the interest of the company\nThe appellant was for many years a director of the company, and therefore concerned with guiding the affairs of the company. He was prima facie a person who would be able to give information likely to promote the purpose of the winding up\nJustice Mitter was satisfied on the statement filed by the official liquidator that the appellant had the custody of certain important books of the company. The plea of the appellant that compelling him to submit to examination without permitting him to have access to the books before answering questions put to him is oppressive has no substance.\nThe affidavit filed on behalf of the liquidator clearly states that the relevant records of the company will be made available to the appellant at the time of the examination. The High Court, in appeal, expressed the view that on the merits there was no ground for interference and it was satisfied that it was desirable and necessary that the appellant as a director should be examined.\nThe appellant having been a director of the company during the period when it is alleged the affairs were mismanaged, is likely to be aware of the management and in possession of information conducive to effective prosecution of the winding up and if the learned Judge thought it fit to order that the appellant be examined the order cannot be regarded as either vexatious or oppressive or otherwise liable to be set aside\nThe appellant has admitted in his affidavit that he was served with a copy of the order, but he has not chosen to produce it in the Court of First Instance, nor is the order printed in the record prepared for the use of the Court in this appeal. It was never suggested before the High Court that the order was made without considering the material facts and circumstances\nThe Court has made the order in exercise of the jurisdiction vested in it and in the absence of any material to show that the order was made for a collateral purpose or by the misleading the Court, the appellant is not entitled to have the order vacated\nIt must be remembered that both the Chief Clerk and the Judge know a great deal more of the proceedings in the winding-up than the Court of Appeal can know, and there may be various grounds for exercising the discretion, upon which the Court of Appeal cannot possibly form any opinion. We must recollect also that it is not necessary to make out a prima facie case-the probability of a case is enough. A fair suspicion may be well worthy of further investigation, and it may well be worth the expense and trouble of examining witnesses to see whether it is well founded. It is not necessary that the applicant should establish his case before he applies to the Judge he may say to the Judge, I have a strong ground for suspecting that a certain transaction was fraudulent if it is proved to be so we shall get a large some of money will you let me lay out a small sum of money in order to examine a witness or two, so as to ascertain the facts\nIn that case the Court will exercise a discretion.\nJustice Mitter was the company Judge in charge of the liquidation proceedings of the Company. Before him a statement of the official liquidator was produced and in the light of the materials placed before him, he passed the order which is now sought to be modified. This Court cannot proceed upon an assumption that the order for examination of a person who has ceased to be a director prior to the date of the winding up must necessarily be regarded as oppressive or vexatious\nA director of a company, past or present, is ordinarily in a position to give useful information about the affairs of the Company in winding up. In the circumstances, we think that the High Court was right in holding that no case was made out for modification of the ex parte order\nRule 243 expressly contemplates that an application for examination under s. 477 may be made ex parte. An application by an official liquidator is required to be supported by a statement signed by him, but the rule does not contemplate any notice to the parties likely to be affected by the issue of the summons\nThe proceedings are intended to be confidential.\nin these mattersthe object being to keep the proceedings secret from the person sought to be affected, and the practice is, and as far as I know always has been, that the liquidator, instead of making an affidavit, simply makes a written statement which he leaves with the Chief Clerk, who thereupon issues an order, and the written statement cannot, be got at by anybody whereas an affidavit can. This practice in our judgement is consonant with right and justice.\nThat proceedings for examination of officers and other persons are confidential is emphasised by rr. 247 and 248. By cl. (2) of r. 247 no person is entitled to take part in the examination under s. 477 except the official liquidator and his advocate but the court may, if it thinks fit, permit any creditor or contributory to attend the examination subject to such conditions as it may impose. Clause (3) provides that notes of the examination may be permitted to be taken by a witness or any person on his behalf on his giving an undertaking that such notes shall be used only for the purposes of re-examination of the witness\nIt is also provided that on the conclusion of the examination, the notes shall, unless otherwise directed, be handed over to the Court for destruction. Rule 248 provides inter alia, that the notes shall not be open to the inspection of any creditor, contributory or other person, except the official liquidator, nor shall a copy thereof or extract there from be supplied to any person other than the official liquidator, save upon orders of the Court\nThe proceedings for examination under s. 477 being intended to be commenced only in the interest of the Company and for the purpose of collecting evidence for the effective prosecution of the liquidation are by rules expressly to be commenced by order which may on the application of the official liquidator be made ex parte. The order does not purport to decide any question in dispute between the Company and the persons sought to be examined. It only proceeds upon the satisfaction of the Court that the person should be examined in the interest of the Company, it appearing to the Court just proper that he should be so examined\nThere is nothing in the scheme of the Act which indicates that an order passed for the examination of a person under. s. 477 may be made only after serving a notice upon such person the Rules expressly contemplate that the order may be made ex parte. Rules of natural justice are therefore not violated merely by the issue of an order requiring a person or persons to appear before a Court for his examination under s. 477\nNor do the rules of procedure framed by this Court for examination under s. 477 contemplate and right of inspection of the statement of the official liquidator. As we have already pointed out, r. 243 contemplates an order ex parte and the scheme of the Rule further emphasises the fact that all these enquiries are intended as already discussed to be confidential proceedings. The person whose examination is sought to be held, has therefore no right to inspect the statement made by the liquidator on which the order of the Court proceeds\nRule 360 of the Companies (Court) Rules provides that every duly authorised officer of a the Central Government, and, save as otherwise provided by these Rules, every persons who has been a director or officer of a company which is being wound up, shall be entitled, free of charge, at all reasonable times to inspect the file of proceedings of the liquidation and to take copies or extracts from any document therein, and, on payment of the prescribed charges to be furnished with such copies or extracts. The right to inspection is given in respect of the file of the proceedings of the liquidation\nBut the statement made by the official liquidator under Rule 243 does not form part of the file of the proceedings of the liquidation. The statement is not to be made on oath it has to be shown to the Company Judge and the Judge has to apply his mind to the contents thereof, but it does not, as pointed out by Mr. Justice Law, form part of the liquidation proceedings\nIn the Company (Court) Rules, there is no rule specifying the documents which are to be included in the file of the liquidation proceedings. The order passed by the Court and the summons issued thereon may be regarded as forming part of the file of the proceeding of liquidation, but having regard to the nature of the statement made by the official liquidator on which this Judges order is passed, it is not part of the file of the proceedings of liquidation\nThe person summoned even if he is an officer or director of the company, is therefore not entitled to inspection thereof relying upon Rule 360.\nThe petition has, it is true, to be supported by a statement, but the statement is independent of the petition. It appears that the practice of the Calcutta High Court, prior to the promulgation of the Companies (Court) Rules, was different.\nUnder r. 195 an application for examination of a person under s 195 of the Indian Companies Act 1913, could be made ex parte to the Judge but it had to be by petition verified by the official liquidator stating the facts upon which the application was based. It was also provided that at the hearing, the Judge may, if satisfied that a prima facie case for examination had been made out, direct the issue of a summons or summonses against the person or persons named in the order for examination and or for the production of the documents. Manifestly, the order could be obtained on a petition which was required to be verified by the official liquidator and there had to be a formal hearing and only if a prima facie case for hearing had been made out the order could be made\nThe mere fact that under r. 195 of the Calcutta High Court Rules under Act of 1913 the appellant might have had a right of access to the statement on which the order was founded will not be an adequate ground for holding that the earlier practice must continue to prevail. If the appellant is not entitled to inspection of the statement he would certainly, for the same reason, not be entitled to a copy of that statement", + "expert_4": "-Ballygunge Real Property and Building Society Ltd.-hereinafter called the Company-was on January 8, 1958, ordered by the High Court of Judicature at Calcutta to be wound up.\nOn January 18, 1960, the Official Liquidator submitted an application accompanied by a signed statement for an order that the appellant be examined under s. 477 of the Indian Companies Act, 1956.\nThis application was granted ex-parte by Mr. Justice \n K. Mitter on January 18, 1960, and the appellant was served with the order to attend the Court on March 22, 1960, for the purpose of being examined concerning the affairs of the company, and to bring with him and produce at the said time and place the following books and papers, mentioned in Schedule B to the order, viz., \n Ballygunge Estate (Private) Ltd.\nThis order was published in public newspapers.\nThe solicitors of the appellant by letters dated February 29, 1960, and March 10, 1960, called upon the Official Liquidator to furnish them with copies of the petition and the report on the basis of which the order was made.\nThe Official Liquidator having informed the solicitors of the appellant that the latter were not entitled to a copy of the report of the official liquidator, the appellant applied by a judges summons for an order recalling vacating, setting aside or modifying the order dated January 18, 1960, and for a direction to the official liquidator requiring him to supply copies of the report of the official liquidator and of the other documents relating to the application and alternatively for an order granting leave to inspect the court records and proceedings of the application and to take copies thereof.\nThe appellant contended that the order made by Mr. Justice Mitter on January 18, 1960, was obtained by suppression of material facts and that, in any event, the order made without notice to the appellant was vexatious and oppressive and amounted to an abuse of the process of Court.\nThe official liquidator submitted that all the available papers in the books with the liquidator will be made available at the time of the examination of the appellant but he-the official liquidator-was not bound to give information in advance about the nature of the enquiry to do so, he contended, would defeat the purpose of the enquiry.\nHe also submitted that the appellant had no right claim inspection or to obtain copies of the statement which accompanied the judges summons dated January 18, 1960.\nMr. Justice Law rejected the application filed by the appellant, holding that the order dated January 18, 1960, was final and that he had no power to review, modify, alter or vary the same, that the order merely summoning for examination under s. 477 of the Companies Act did not affect a partys rights, there being no charge, no complaint and no allegation against him.\nThe learned Judge observed that it was not necessary for the Court in the first instance to determine that the person called upon to furnish information actually possessed that information if the Court has reasons to think, or if even an allegation is made that a certain person is in possession of information which would be of use in the course of winding up, the Court can call upon him to appear in Court and examine him, and that rr. 243 (1) and 243 (2) of Companies (Court) Rules laid down the same procedure as was laid down in In re Gold Company (1879 12 Ch.\nIn the view of the learned Judge the statement of the official liquidator on which the order dated January 18, 1960, was made not being on oath or affirmation was not legal evidence and did not form part of the proceedings of the Court and the appellant could not demand facility for inspection of the statement or copy thereof.\nAgainst the order of Mr. Justice Law an appeal was preferred to a Division Bench of the High Court.\nThe High Court held that the order having been initially pass ex parte an application for discharging or modifying the order was in law maintainable at the instance of the appellant but the order in so far as it directed the appellant who was a director of the Company to appear before the Court to be examined touching upon the affairs of the Company was, in the circumstances of the case, desirable and necessary, and that the statement of the official liquidator on which the order dated January 18, 1960, was issued not being an affidavit was not required by the Companies (Court) Rules 1959 to be kept on the file of the liquidation proceedings the statement was a confidential document and was-save by order of the Court-not open to inspection of any person other than the liquidator.\nThe learned judges modified the order in so far as it directed production of the books of account relating to the Ballygunge Estate (Private) Ltd. and the Ballygunge Building Society Private Ltd., because those companies were not parties to the liquidation proceedings.\nAgainst the order of the High Court this appeal with special leave has been preferred to this Court.\nThree questions fall to be determined \n Whether an ex parte order directing the examination of a person under s. 477 of the Indian Companies Act, 1956 is liable to be modified, or vacated on the application of the persons affected thereby \n Whether there is any ground for discharging or modifying the order dated January 18, 1960 and \n Whether the appellant is entitled before his examination to inspect the statement submitted by the official liquidator in support of the application for the order dated January 18, 1960, or to be furnished with a copy thereof.\nSection 477 of the Indian Companies Act, 1956, provides 477 (1) The Court may, at any time after the appointment of a provisional liquidator or the making of a winding up order summon before it any officer of the company or person known or suspected to have in his possession any property or books or papers of the company, or known or suspected to be indebted to the company, or any person whom the Court deems capable of giving information concerning the promotion, formation, trade, dealings, property, books or papers, or affairs of the company.\nThe Court may examine any officer or person so summoned on oath concerning the matters aforesaid, either by word of mouth or on written interrogatories and may, in the former case, reduce his answers to writing and require him to sign them. The Court may require any officer or person so summoned to produce any books and papers in his custody or power relating to the company but, where he claims any lien on books or papers, produced by him, the production shall be without prejudice to that lien, and the Court shall have jurisdiction in the winding up to determine all questions relating to that lien.\nIf any officer or person so summoned, after being paid or tendered a reasonable sum for his expenses, fails to appear before the Court at the time appointed, not having a lawful impediment (made known to the Court at the time of its sitting and allowed by it), the Court may cause him to be apprehended and brought before the Court for examination.\nIf, on his examination, any officer or person so summoned admits that he is indebted to the company, the Court may order him to pay to the provisional liquidator or, as the case may be, the liquidator at such time and in such manner as to the Court may seem just the amount in which he is indebted, or any part thereof, either in full discharge of the whole amount or not, as the Court thinks fit, with or without costs of the examination.\nIf, on his examination, any such officer or person admits that he has in his possession any property belonging to the company, the Court may order him to deliver to the provisional liquidator or, as the case may be, the liquidator, that property or any part thereof, at such time, in such manner and on such terms as to the Court may seem just. Orders made under sub-sections (5) and (6) shall be executed in the same manner as decrees for the payment of money or for delivery of property under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 respectively. Any person making any payment or delivery in pursuance of an order made under subsection (5) or sub-section (6) shall by such payment or delivery be, unless otherwise directed by such order, discharged from all liability whatsoever in respect of such debt or property.\nSection 463 of the Companies Act authorises this Court to make rules for all matters relating to winding up of companies which by the Act are to be prescribed and for other matters.\nThis court has framed Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, out of which rr. 243, 244 and 249, which are material, are as follows - \n Application for examination under Section 477.-(1) An application for the examination of a person under Section 477 may be made ex parte provided that where the application is made by any person other than the Official Liquidator, notice of the application shall be given to the Official Liquidator. The summons shall be in Form 109 and, where the application is by the Official Liquidator, shall be accompanied by a statement signed by him setting forth the facts on which the application is based. Where the application is made by a person other than the Official Liquidator, the summons shall be supported by an affidavit of the applicant setting forth the matters in respect of which the examination is sought and the grounds relied on in support of the summons.\n-Upon the hearing of the summons the Judge may, if satisfied that there are grounds for making the orders, make an order directing the issue of summons against the person named in the order for his examination and or for the production of documents. Unless the Judge otherwise directs, the examination of such person shall be held in Chambers. The order shall be in Form No. 110.\nOrder for public examination under section 478.-(1) where an order is made for the examination of any person or persons under Section 478, the examination shall be held before the Judge provided that in the case of High Court, the Judge may direct that the whole or any part of the examination of any such person or persons, be held before any of the officers mentioned in sub-section (10) of the said Section as may be mentioned in the order Where the date of the examination has not been fixed by the order, the Official Liquidator shall take an appointment from the Judge or officer before whom the examination is to be held as to the date of the examination. The order directing a public examination shall be in Form No. 112. The Judge may, if he things fit, either in the order for examination or by any subsequent order, give directions to the specific matters on which such person is to be examined.\nBy s. 477 the Court is authorised to summon before it (1) any officer of the Company, (2) any person known or suspected to have in his possession any property or books or papers of the Company, and (3) any person known or suspected to be indebted to the company, or any person whom the Court deems capable of giving information concerning the promotion, formation, trade, dealings, property, books or papers or affairs of the company.\nBy r. 243 an application for an order for examination may be made ex parte, and the Company Judge may, if he is satisfied that the interest of the company will be served by the examination of a person-be he an officer of the company or other person make the order.\nThe primary test for making the order is whether it is just and beneficial to the business of the company, But the power conferred by the section is very wide and the Court must guard itself against being made an instrument of vexation or oppression.\nThe order which is made ex-parte is not final it is always open to a person summoned to apply for vacating or modifying the order on the ground that it has been obtained without placing all the requisite materials before the Court or by mis-statement of facts or on other adequate grounds.\nRule 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules preserves to the Court its inherent powers to give such directions or pass such orders as may be necessary for the ends of justice or to prevent abuse of the process of Court, and a direction to vacate an order previously made, is in a proper case within the Courts inherent jurisdiction.\nThe relevant provisions of the English Companies Act, 1862 (25 26 Vict. c. 89), the English Companies Act, 1929 (19 20 Geo V c.3) and the English Companies Act, 1948 (11 12 Geo VI c,88) on the question relating to examination of officers of the company or other persons are substantially the same as s. 477 of the Indians Companies Act, 1956, and the principles laid down by the superior Courts in England, which have been assimilated in the practice of Company winding up by the Courts in India are useful in determining the nature of the proceeding.\nIn re North Australian Territory Company (1), Lord Justice Cotton vacated an order in appeal where the order for examination was not made in the interest of the Company in liquidation, but was made with a view to assist the interest of the company in prosecuting an action which has been brought up by the liquidator.\nthe Court held that the liquidator had shown no reason for seeking discovery except to assist him in the action and so to evade the order of the Judge postponing discovery in the action and therefore the witness was justified in refusing to answer the question.\nLord Justice Bowen in that case observed that the power conferred by s. 115 is an extra-ordinary power. It is a power of an inquisitorial kind which enables the Court to direct to be examined-not merely before itself, but before the examiner appointed by the Court-some third person who is no party to a litigation.\nThat is an inquisitorial power, which may work with great severity against third persons, and it seems to me to be obvious that such a section ought to be used with the greatest care, so as not unnecessarily put in motion the machinery of justice when it is not wanted or to put it in motion at a stage when it is not clear that it is wanted, and certainly not to put it is motion if unnecessary mischief is going to be done or hardship inflicted upon the third person who is called upon to appear and give information.\nIn re Metropolitan Bank (Heirons case)(1) a similar situation arose.\nIt was held that the liquidator must satisfy the Court that it would be just and beneficial for the purposes of the winding up. The Court in that case held that the action of the liquidator was vexatious.\nIn In re Mavile Hose, Limited, (2) an order which was regarded as premature and oppressive in the circumstances of the case was discharged by the Court.\nThe Court has therefore jurisdiction in proper cases, i.e. where it is satisfied that the order is vexatious, or oppressive, or where other adequate grounds exist to discharge the same. In our view, the High Court was right in holding that in a proper case it would be open to the Company Judge to vacate an ex-parte order obtained under r. 243 of the Companies (Court) Rules. The jurisdiction to vacate or modify an ex- parte order under r. 243 being granted, the question which falls to be determined is whether the order passed by Mr.\nJustice Mitter was oppressive or vexatious or otherwise liable to be vacated or modified for adequate grounds.\nIn our view, there is no ground for holding that the order is liable to be vacated or modified.\nIt was never even suggested in the High Court that the order for examination was per se oppressive or vexatious.\nThis is not a case in which the order is sought to facilitate the progress of an action filed by the official liquidator against the appellant, nor is there reason to hold that the order is sought in aid of some collateral purpose-a purpose other than effective progress of the winding up in the interest of the company. The appellant was for many years a director of the company, and therefore concerned with guiding the affairs of the company.\nHe was prima facie a person who would be able to give information likely to promote the purpose of the winding up.\nIt appears also that Mr. Justice Mitter was satisfied on the statement filed by the official liquidator that the appellant had the custody of certain important books of the company.\nThe plea of the appellant that compelling him to submit to examination without permitting him to have access to the books before answering questions put to him is oppressive has no substance.\nThe High Court, in appeal, expressed the view that on the merits there was no ground for interference and it was satisfied that it was desirable and necessary that the appellant as a director should be examined. The appellant having been a director of the company during the period when it is alleged the affairs were mismanaged, is likely to be aware of the management and in possession of information conducive to effective prosecution of the winding up and if the learned Judge thought it fit to order that the appellant be examined the order cannot be regarded as either vexatious or oppressive or otherwise liable to be set aside.\nIt was never suggested before the High Court that the order was made without considering the material facts and circumstances.\nThe Court has made the order in exercise of the jurisdiction vested in it and in the absence of any material to show that the order was made for a collateral purpose or by the misleading the Court, the appellant is not entitled to have the order vacated.\nAs pointed out by the Master of the Rolls in In re Gold Company Ltd., (1) It must be remembered that both the Chief Clerk and the Judge know a great deal more of the proceedings in the winding-up than the Court of Appeal can know, and there may be various grounds for exercising the discretion, upon which the Court of Appeal cannot possibly form any opinion.\nWe must recollect also that it is not necessary to make out a prima facie case-the probability of a case is enough.\nA fair suspicion may be well worthy of further investigation, and it may well be worth the expense and trouble of examining witnesses to see whether it is well founded. It is not necessary that the applicant should establish his case before he applies to the Judge he may say to the Judge, I have a strong ground for suspecting that a certain transaction was fraudulent if it is proved to be so we shall get a large some of money will you let me lay out a small sum of money in order to examine a witness or two, so as to ascertain the facts? In that case the Court will exercise a discretion.\nThis Court cannot proceed upon an assumption that the order for examination of a person who has ceased to be a director prior to the date of the winding up must necessarily be regarded as oppressive or vexatious. A director of a company, past or present, is ordinarily in a position to give useful information about the affairs of the Company in winding up. In the circumstances, we think that the High Court was right in holding that no case was made out for modification of the ex parte order.\nRule 243 expressly contemplates that an application for examination under s. 477 may be made ex parte.\nAn application by an official liquidator is required to be supported by a statement signed by him, but the rule does not contemplate any notice to the parties likely to be affected by the issue of the summons. The proceedings are intended to be confidential.\nAs observed in In re Gold Company (1) by Sir George Jessel R in these mattersthe object being to keep the proceedings secret from the person sought to be affected, and the practice is, and as far as I know always has been, that the liquidator, instead of making an affidavit, simply makes a written statement which he leaves with the Chief Clerk, who thereupon issues an order, and the written statement cannot, be got at by anybody whereas an affidavit can.\nThis practice in our judgement is consonant with right and justice. That proceedings for examination of officers and other persons are confidential is emphasised by rr. 247 and 248. By cl. (2) of r. 247 no person is entitled to take part in the examination under s. 477 except the official liquidator and his advocate but the court may, if it thinks fit, permit any creditor or contributory to attend the examination subject to such conditions as it may impose.\nThe proceedings for examination under s. 477 being intended to be commenced only in the interest of the Company and for the purpose of collecting evidence for the effective prosecution of the liquidation are by rules expressly to be commenced by order which may on the application of the official liquidator be made ex parte. The order does not purport to decide any question in dispute between the Company and the persons sought to be examined. It only proceeds upon the satisfaction of the Court that the person should be examined in the interest of the Company, it appearing to the Court just proper that he should be so examined.\nThere is nothing in the scheme of the Act which indicates that an order passed for the examination of a person under. s. 477 may be made only after serving a notice upon such person the Rules expressly contemplate that the order may be made ex parte.\nRules of natural justice are therefore not violated merely by the issue of an order requiring a person or persons to appear before a Court for his examination under s. 477.\nNor do the rules of procedure framed by this Court for examination under s. 477 contemplate and right of inspection of the statement of the official liquidator.\nAs we have already pointed out, r. 243 contemplates an order ex parte and the scheme of the Rule further emphasises the fact that all these enquiries are intended as already discussed to be confidential proceedings. The person whose examination is sought to be held, has therefore no right to inspect the statement made by the liquidator on which the order of the Court proceeds.\nthe statement made by the official liquidator under Rule 243 does not form part of the file of the proceedings of the liquidation. The statement is not to be made on oath it has to be shown to the Company Judge and the Judge has to apply his mind to the contents thereof, but it does not, as pointed out by Mr. Justice Law, form part of the liquidation proceedings.\nIn the Company (Court) Rules, there is no rule specifying the documents which are to be included in the file of the liquidation proceedings.\nThe order passed by the Court and the summons issued thereon may be regarded as forming part of the file of the proceeding of liquidation, but having regard to the nature of the statement made by the official liquidator on which this Judges order is passed, it is not part of the file of the proceedings of liquidation.\nThe person summoned even if he is an officer or director of the company, is therefore not entitled to inspection thereof relying upon Rule 360.\nThere is however, no warrant for the view that the petition and the statement form part of the same document.\nThe petition has, it is true, to be supported by a statement, but the statement is independent of the petition.\nThe mere fact that under r. 195 of the Calcutta High Court Rules under Act of 1913 the appellant might have had a right of access to the statement on which the order was founded will not be an adequate ground for holding that the earlier practice must continue to prevail. If the appellant is not entitled to inspection of the statement he would certainly, for the same reason, not be entitled to a copy of that statement.", + "expert_5": "This application was granted ex-parte by Mr. Justice \n K. Mitter\nBut the power conferred by the section is very wide and the Court must guard itself against being made an instrument of vexation or oppression.\nThe order which is made ex-parte is not final it is always open to a person summoned to apply for vacating or modifying the order on the ground that it has been obtained without placing all the requisite materials before the Court or by mis-statement of facts or on other adequate grounds. Rule 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules preserves to the Court its inherent powers to give such directions or pass such orders as may be necessary for the ends of justice or to prevent abuse of the process of Court, and a direction to vacate an order previously made, is in a proper case within the Courts inherent jurisdiction.\nThe Court has therefore jurisdiction in proper cases, i.e. where it is satisfied that the order is vexatious, or oppressive, or where other adequate grounds exist to discharge the same. In our view, the High Court was right in holding that in a proper case it would be open to the Company Judge to vacate an ex-parte order obtained under r. 243 of the Companies (Court) Rules.\nIn our view, there is no ground for holding that the order is liable to be vacated or modified.\nIt was never even suggested in the High Court that the order for examination was per se oppressive or vexatious.\nThis is not a case in which the order is sought to facilitate the progress of an action filed by the official liquidator against the appellant, nor is there reason to hold that the order is sought in aid of some collateral purpose-a purpose other than effective progress of the winding up in the interest of the company.\nThe appellant was for many years a director of the company, and therefore concerned with guiding the affairs of the company. He was prima facie a person who would be able to give information likely to promote the purpose of the winding up.\nIt appears also that Mr. Justice Mitter was satisfied on the statement filed by the official liquidator that the appellant had the custody of certain important books of the company.\nThe appellant having been a director of the company during the period when it is alleged the affairs were mismanaged, is likely to be aware of the management and in possession of information conducive to effective prosecution of the winding up and if the learned Judge thought it fit to order that the appellant be examined the order cannot be regarded as either vexatious or oppressive or otherwise liable to be set aside.\nThe appellant has admitted in his affidavit that he was served with a copy of the order, but he has not chosen to produce it in the Court of First Instance, nor is the order printed in the record prepared for the use of the Court in this appeal. It was never suggested before the High Court that the order was made without considering the material facts and circumstances.\nThe Court has made the order in exercise of the jurisdiction vested in it and in the absence of any material to show that the order was made for a collateral purpose or by the misleading the Court, the appellant is not entitled to have the order vacated.\nAs pointed out by the Master of the Rolls in In re Gold Company Ltd., (1) It must be remembered that both the Chief Clerk and the Judge know a great deal more of the proceedings in the winding-up than the Court of Appeal can know, and there may be various grounds for exercising the discretion, upon which the Court of Appeal cannot possibly form any opinion.\nit is not necessary to make out a prima facie case-the probability of a case is enough. A fair suspicion may be well worthy of further investigation, and it may well be worth the expense and trouble of examining witnesses to see whether it is well founded.\nIt is not necessary that the applicant should establish his case before he applies to the Judge he may say to the Judge, I have a strong ground for suspecting that a certain transaction was fraudulent if it is proved to be so we shall get a large some of money will you let me lay out a small sum of money in order to examine a witness or two, so as to ascertain the facts?\nThis Court cannot proceed upon an assumption that the order for examination of a person who has ceased to be a director prior to the date of the winding up must necessarily be regarded as oppressive or vexatious.\nA director of a company, past or present, is ordinarily in a position to give useful information about the affairs of the Company in winding up.\nRule 243 expressly contemplates that an application for examination under s. 477 may be made ex parte.\nAs observed in In re Gold Company (1) by Sir George Jessel R in these mattersthe object being to keep the proceedings secret from the person sought to be affected, and the practice is, and as far as I know always has been, that the liquidator, instead of making an affidavit, simply makes a written statement which he leaves with the Chief Clerk, who thereupon issues an order, and the written statement cannot, be got at by anybody whereas an affidavit can.\nThis practice in our judgement is consonant with right and justice.\nBy cl. (2) of r. 247 no person is entitled to take part in the examination under s. 477 except the official liquidator and his advocate but the court may, if it thinks fit, permit any creditor or contributory to attend the examination subject to such conditions as it may impose. Clause (3) provides that notes of the examination may be permitted to be taken by a witness or any person on his behalf on his giving an undertaking that such notes shall be used only for the purposes of re-examination of the witness. It is also provided that on the conclusion of the examination, the notes shall, unless otherwise directed, be handed over to the Court for destruction.\nThe order does not purport to decide any question in dispute between the Company and the persons sought to be examined. It only proceeds upon the satisfaction of the Court that the person should be examined in the interest of the Company, it appearing to the Court just proper that he should be so examined.\nThere is nothing in the scheme of the Act which indicates that an order passed for the examination of a person under. s. 477 may be made only after serving a notice upon such person the Rules expressly contemplate that the order may be made ex parte. Rules of natural justice are therefore not violated merely by the issue of an order requiring a person or persons to appear before a Court for his examination under s. 477.\nNor do the rules of procedure framed by this Court for examination under s. 477 contemplate and right of inspection of the statement of the official liquidator.\nAs we have already pointed out, r. 243 contemplates an order ex parte and the scheme of the Rule further emphasises the fact that all these enquiries are intended as already discussed to be confidential proceedings.\nThe person whose examination is sought to be held, has therefore no right to inspect the statement made by the liquidator on which the order of the Court proceeds.\nRule 360 of the Companies (Court) Rules provides that every duly authorised officer of a the Central Government, and, save as otherwise provided by these Rules, every persons who has been a director or officer of a company which is being wound up, shall be entitled, free of charge, at all reasonable times to inspect the file of proceedings of the liquidation and to take copies or extracts from any document therein, and, on payment of the prescribed charges to be furnished with such copies or extracts.\nThe right to inspection is given in respect of the file of the proceedings of the liquidation. But the statement made by the official liquidator under Rule 243 does not form part of the file of the proceedings of the liquidation.\nIn the Company (Court) Rules, there is no rule specifying the documents which are to be included in the file of the liquidation proceedings. The order passed by the Court and the summons issued thereon may be regarded as forming part of the file of the proceeding of liquidation, but having regard to the nature of the statement made by the official liquidator on which this Judges order is passed, it is not part of the file of the proceedings of liquidation. \nThe person summoned even if he is an officer or director of the company, is therefore not entitled to inspection thereof relying upon Rule 360.\nUnder the Companies (Court) Rules a different practice, which approaches the practice prevailing in the English Courts has been set up.\nThe mere fact that under r. 195 of the Calcutta High Court Rules under Act of 1913 the appellant might have had a right of access to the statement on which the order was founded will not be an adequate ground for holding that the earlier practice must continue to prevail." + }, + "1961_365": { + "expert_1": "This is an appeal with special leave under article 136 of the Constitution against the order of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, refusing to call for a statement of case from the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal under section 66(2) of the Income-tax Act.\nThe Income-tax Officer found that the appellants had inflated the loss by Rs. 1,85,000 and that the shares being capital investment and not stock-in-trade, the loss could not be allowed as a revenue deduction. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner disagreed with the view of the Income-tax Officer and held that the shares were the stock-in-trade of the appellants, but agreeing with the Income-tax Officer he held that the loss had been inflated by Rs. 1,85,000. Against this order, the Income-tax Officer appealed to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal which reversed the order of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and restored the order of the Income-tax Officer. The Tribunal held that the mere fact that in the previous years the shares were treated as stock-in-trade and the profits and losses in respect thereof were included in the taxable income of the appellants did not preclude the Tribunal from arriving at the conclusion that the shares were capital investment. They substantially confirmed the view of the Income-tax Officer on the facts found.\nAn application submitted by the appellants for a reference under section 66 (1) of the Income-tax Act of the following questions was rejected by the Tribunal.\n Whether the Tribunal misdirected itself in law and or acted without any evidence in finding that the investment of the assessee in the shares of the Sholapur Mills was a capital investment and not its stock-in-trade ? Whether in any event in view of the assessments made for the years 1945-46, 1946-47 and 1947-48 and the Appellate Assistant Commissioners order for these three years, it was open to the department to hold for the assessment years 1949-50 that the said shares do not represent the assessees stock-in-trade ? Whether the Tribunal misdirected itself in law in omitting to consider certain material facts which were taken into account by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and expressly maintained in the Appellate Assistant Commissioners order, including the fact that the assessee had been holding shares in several other companies as stock- in-trade and this position has been accepted by the department although in those shares there have been preferred with special leave.\nIn our view, the High Court was right in refusing to call for a statement of the case under section 66(2) of the Income-tax Act. The conclusion of the Tribunal was based on inferences of fact raised from materials before the taxing authorities. The conduct of the appellants clearly indicated that even though they were dealing in shares of other companies, the shares of the Sholapur Mills were treated by them as capital investment for the purpose of maintaining their managing agency. The number of shares held by the appellants went on increasing from time to time and not a single share was ever sold.\nThe Tribunal pointed out that the returns for the assessment years 1945-46, 1946-47 and 1947-48 were filed by the appellants after they knew that there were wide fluctuations in the quotation of the shares of that company. They also referred to the circumstance that the appellants were interested in the managing agency of the Sholapur Mills and that every member of the family of the appellants was holding shares\nThe conclusion of the Tribunal was amply supported by evidence. It can not be said that because in the previous years the shares were held to be stock-in-trade, they must be similarly treated for the assessment year 1949-50. In the matter of assessment of income-tax, each years assessment is complete and the decision arrived at in a previous year on material before the taxing authorities cannot be regarded as binding in the assessment for the subsequent years. The Tribunal is not shown to have omitted to consider the material facts. The decision of the Tribunal was on a question of fact and no question of law arose which could be directed to be referred under section 66(2) of the Income-tax Act.", + "expert_2": "This is an appeal with special leave under article 136 of the Constitution against the order of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, refusing to call for a statement of case from the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal under section 66(2) of the Income-tax Act.\nshares were entered in the books of account of the appellants as stock-in-trade and valued accordingly at the end of each accounting period. During all these years, not a single shares, ordinary or preference, was sold by the appellants.\nThe Income-tax Officer found that the appellants had inflated the loss by Rs. 1,85,000 and that the shares being capital investment and not stock-in-trade, the loss could not be allowed as a revenue deduction.\nThe Tribunal held that the mere fact that in the previous years the shares were treated as stock-in-trade and the profits and losses in respect thereof were included in the taxable income of the appellants did not preclude the Tribunal from arriving at the conclusion that the shares were capital investment.\nThe conduct of the appellants clearly indicated that even though they were dealing in shares of other companies, the shares of the Sholapur Mills were treated by them as capital investment for the purpose of maintaining their managing agency\nThe number of shares held by the appellants went on increasing from time to time and not a single share was ever sold. The Tribunal pointed out that the returns for the assessment years 1945-46, 1946-47 and 1947-48 were filed by the appellants after they knew that there were wide fluctuations in the quotation of the shares of that company. They also referred to the circumstance that the appellants were interested in the managing agency of the Sholapur Mills and that every member of the family of the appellants was holding shares \n \n The conclusion of the Tribunal was amply supported by evidence.\nIt can not be said that because in the previous years the shares were held to be stock-in-trade, they must be similarly treated for the assessment year 1949-50. In the matter of assessment of income-tax, each years assessment is complete and the decision arrived at in a previous year on material before the taxing authorities cannot be regarded as binding in the assessment for the subsequent years.\nThe decision of the Tribunal was on a question of fact and no question of law arose which could be directed to be referred under section 66(2) of the Income-tax Act.", + "expert_3": "This is an appeal with special leave under article 136 of the Constitution against the order of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, refusing to call for a statement of case from the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal under section 66(2) of the Income-tax Act\nThe appellants are a registered firm carrying on the business of money- lending and speculation in silver and shares. The partners of the appellants firm were also partners of Messrs. Morarka Co., who were the managing agents of the Sholapur Spinning and Weaving Company Ltd. - hereinafter called the Sholapur Mills. The firm commenced business in August, 1942.\nIn Samvat year 2000 (November, 1943, to October, 1944) the appellants purchased seventeen ordinary shares of the Sholapur Mills and thereafter they purchased 82 more ordinary shares between November, 1944, and October, 1948. By November, 1948, the appellants held 99 ordinary shares\nThe appellants also purchased at diverse times 6,780 preference shares of the Sholapur Mills. All these shares were entered in the books of account of the appellants as stock-in-trade and valued accordingly at the end of each accounting period. During all these years, not a single shares, ordinary or preference, was sold by the appellants\nIn the proceedings for assessment of tax in the assessment years 1945-46 and 1946-47, the Income-tax Officer disallowed the loss claimed holding that the shares formed the appellants capital investment. In the assessment year 1947-48, the Income-tax Officer excluded from the return the amount of profit alleged to have resulted to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner by three orders dated May 4, 1951, the shares of the Sholapur Mills were held to be stock-in-trade and the profits or losses computed according to the method of valuation adopted by the appellants were directed to be taken into account in assessing the taxable income. These orders were not challenged in appeals to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal\nIn the assessment year 1948-49, the appellants did not furnish return and they were assessed to tax under section 23(4) of the Income-tax Act. For the assessment year 1949-50, the appellants furnished their return claiming that they incurred a loss of Rs. 3,33,851 in the shares of the Sholapur Mills.\nThis was computed on the alleged difference between the market value of the shares at the close of the previous year of account and the market value at the end of the accounting period, the shares being treated as stock-in-trade\nThe Income-tax Officer found that the appellants had inflated the loss by Rs. 1,85,000 and that the shares being capital investment and not stock-in-trade, the loss could not be allowed as a revenue deduction\nThe Tribunal held that the mere fact that in the previous years the shares were treated as stock-in-trade and the profits and losses in respect thereof were included in the taxable income of the appellants did not preclude the Tribunal from arriving at the conclusion that the shares were capital investment\nAn application submitted by the appellants for a reference under section 66 (1) of the Income-tax Act of the following questions was rejected by the Tribunal.\n Whether the Tribunal misdirected itself in law and or acted without any evidence in finding that the investment of the assessee in the shares of the Sholapur Mills was a capital investment and not its stock-in-trade ? Whether in any event in view of the assessments made for the years 1945-46, 1946-47 and 1947-48 and the Appellate Assistant Commissioners order for these three years, it was open to the department to hold for the assessment years 1949-50 that the said shares do not represent the assessees stock-in-trade ? Whether the Tribunal misdirected itself in law in omitting to consider certain material facts which were taken into account by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and expressly maintained in the Appellate Assistant Commissioners order, including the fact that the assessee had been holding shares in several other companies as stock- in-trade and this position has been accepted by the department although in those shares there have been preferred with special leave. In our view, the High Court was right in refusing to call for a statement of the case under section 66(2) of the Income-tax Act\nThe conduct of the appellants clearly indicated that even though they were dealing in shares of other companies, the shares of the Sholapur Mills were treated by them as capital investment for the purpose of maintaining their managing agency. The number of shares held by the appellants went on increasing from time to time and not a single share was ever sold\nThe Tribunal pointed out that the returns for the assessment years 1945-46, 1946-47 and 1947-48 were filed by the appellants after they knew that there were wide fluctuations in the quotation of the shares of that company. They also referred to the circumstance that the appellants were interested in the managing agency of the Sholapur Mills and that every member of the family of the appellants was holding shares \n \n The conclusion of the Tribunal was amply supported by evidence\nIt can not be said that because in the previous years the shares were held to be stock-in-trade, they must be similarly treated for the assessment year 1949-50. In the matter of assessment of income-tax, each years assessment is complete and the decision arrived at in a previous year on material before the taxing authorities cannot be regarded as binding in the assessment for the subsequent years\nThe Tribunal is not shown to have omitted to consider the material facts. The decision of the Tribunal was on a question of fact and no question of law arose which could be directed to be referred under section 66(2) of the Income-tax Act", + "expert_4": "This is an appeal with special leave under article 136 of the Constitution against the order of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, refusing to call for a statement of case from the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal under section 66(2) of the Income-tax Act.\nThe appellants are a registered firm carrying on the business of money- lending and speculation in silver and shares. The partners of the appellants firm were also partners of Messrs. Morarka Co., who were the managing agents of the Sholapur Spinning and Weaving Company Ltd. - hereinafter called the Sholapur Mills.\nFor the assessment year 1949-50, the appellants furnished their return claiming that they incurred a loss of Rs. 3,33,851 in the shares of the Sholapur Mills.\nThis was computed on the alleged difference between the market value of the shares at the close of the previous year of account and the market value at the end of the accounting period, the shares being treated as stock-in-trade.\nThe Income-tax Officer found that the appellants had inflated the loss by Rs. 1,85,000 and that the shares being capital investment and not stock-in-trade, the loss could not be allowed as a revenue deduction.\nThe Appellate Assistant Commissioner disagreed with the view of the Income-tax Officer and held that the shares were the stock-in-trade of the appellants, but agreeing with the Income-tax Officer he held that the loss had been inflated by Rs. 1,85,000.\nAgainst this order, the Income-tax Officer appealed to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal which reversed the order of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and restored the order of the Income-tax Officer.\nThe Tribunal held that the mere fact that in the previous years the shares were treated as stock-in-trade and the profits and losses in respect thereof were included in the taxable income of the appellants did not preclude the Tribunal from arriving at the conclusion that the shares were capital investment.\nThey substantially confirmed the view of the Income-tax Officer on the facts found.\nAn application submitted by the appellants for a reference under section 66 (1) of the Income-tax Act of the following questions was rejected by the Tribunal.\n Whether the Tribunal misdirected itself in law and or acted without any evidence in finding that the investment of the assessee in the shares of the Sholapur Mills was a capital investment and not its stock-in-trade ?\nWhether in any event in view of the assessments made for the years 1945-46, 1946-47 and 1947-48 and the Appellate Assistant Commissioners order for these three years, it was open to the department to hold for the assessment years 1949-50 that the said shares do not represent the assessees stock-in-trade ?\nWhether the Tribunal misdirected itself in law in omitting to consider certain material facts which were taken into account by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and expressly maintained in the Appellate Assistant Commissioners order, including the fact that the assessee had been holding shares in several other companies as stock- in-trade and this position has been accepted by the department although in those shares there have been preferred with special leave.\nIn our view, the High Court was right in refusing to call for a statement of the case under section 66(2) of the Income-tax Act.\nThe conclusion of the Tribunal was based on inferences of fact raised from materials before the taxing authorities. The conduct of the appellants clearly indicated that even though they were dealing in shares of other companies, the shares of the Sholapur Mills were treated by them as capital investment for the purpose of maintaining their managing agency. The number of shares held by the appellants went on increasing from time to time and not a single share was ever sold.\nThe Tribunal pointed out that the returns for the assessment years 1945-46, 1946-47 and 1947-48 were filed by the appellants after they knew that there were wide fluctuations in the quotation of the shares of that company.\nThey also referred to the circumstance that the appellants were interested in the managing agency of the Sholapur Mills and that every member of the family of the appellants was holding shares \n \n The conclusion of the Tribunal was amply supported by evidence.\nIt can not be said that because in the previous years the shares were held to be stock-in-trade, they must be similarly treated for the assessment year 1949-50. In the matter of assessment of income-tax, each years assessment is complete and the decision arrived at in a previous year on material before the taxing authorities cannot be regarded as binding in the assessment for the subsequent years.\nThe Tribunal is not shown to have omitted to consider the material facts.\nThe decision of the Tribunal was on a question of fact and no question of law arose which could be directed to be referred under section 66(2) of the Income-tax Act.", + "expert_5": "The appellants are a registered firm carrying on the business of money- lending and speculation in silver and shares.\nnot a single shares, ordinary or preference, was sold by the appellants.\nThe Tribunal held that the mere fact that in the previous years the shares were treated as stock-in-trade and the profits and losses in respect thereof were included in the taxable income of the appellants did not preclude the Tribunal from arriving at the conclusion that the shares were capital investment.\nIn our view, the High Court was right in refusing to call for a statement of the case under section 66(2) of the Income-tax Act. The conclusion of the Tribunal was based on inferences of fact raised from materials before the taxing authorities.\neven though they were dealing in shares of other companies, the shares of the Sholapur Mills were treated by them as capital investment for the purpose of maintaining their managing agency.\nThe number of shares held by the appellants went on increasing from time to time and not a single share was ever sold.\ncircumstance that the appellants were interested in the managing agency of the Sholapur Mills and that every member of the family of the appellants was holding shares \n \n The conclusion of the Tribunal was amply supported by evidence.\nIt can not be said that because in the previous years the shares were held to be stock-in-trade, they must be similarly treated for the assessment year 1949-50.\nIn the matter of assessment of income-tax, each years assessment is complete and the decision arrived at in a previous year on material before the taxing authorities cannot be regarded as binding in the assessment for the subsequent years.\nThe Tribunal is not shown to have omitted to consider the material facts. The decision of the Tribunal was on a question of fact and no question of law arose which could be directed to be referred under section 66(2) of the Income-tax Act." + }, + "1961_400": { + "expert_1": "This is an appeal against the judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Patna from an order commanding the Accountant General of Bihar, Ranchi, to pay certain passage allowance due under the Superior Civil Services (Revision of Pay and Pension) Rules, 1924, to the wife and the children of the respondent.\nThe effect of these amendments was that instead of allowing as part of salary, passage pay of Rs. 50/- and carrying over that amount to the credit of the officer concerned in the General Passage Fund, by cl. 6 of the Regulations it was directed that a separate passage account be opened for each officer and if he be married for his wife and children, if any. Subject to Regulations, the accounts wire to be credited respectively with the number of passages to which the officer, his wife and children were entitled under the new regulations. Within the limits of these credits, the officer was entitled to draw for himself, his wife and his children respectively the port of a journey between a port in India and a port outside Asia. Whereas by the Rules as originally framed in 1924 an additional salary of Rs. 50/- per mensem was awarded to each officer as passage pay which was to be credited to the General Passage Fund out of which passage benefits to officers were provided, according to the scheme of the Rules as amended in 1926, a separate passage account was to be maintained for each officer for the maximum benefits prescribed by Rule 3 and the disbursement in respect thereof were to be made of the General Revenue of the State. By the amendment made in the Rules in 1926, the passage benefit ceased to be a part of the salary and became an allowance or privilege.\nThe respondent obtained benefit of these passages in 1930, 1950-51 and 1952-53 for himself and the members of his family. In 1957 he has not granted the passage benefit for his wife and his children, and he has filed this petition under Art. 226 for an order that the Union of India and the Accountant General do carry out their Statutory obligations. The conditions of the to which members of the Indian Civil Service were entiled under the Government of India Act, 1919, were guaranteed to them by s.247(1) of the Government of India Act, 1935.\nThe proviso makes it abundantly clear that the power to make rules cannot be exercised by the Secretary of State so as to give to any officer of the class specified terms less favorable as respects remuneration or pension than were given to him by the rules in force on the date on which he was first appointed to his service or to his post.\nThe only question which falls to be determined in this appeal is whether cl. 3 of the All India Services (overseas Pay, Passage and Leave Salary) Rules, 1957, was competently enacted, having regard to the guarantee contained in Art. 314 of the constitution as to the conditions of service as respects remuneration, leave and pension of the persons appointed by the Secretary of State or Secretary of State for India in Council to a civil service of the Crown in India. Since the All India Services Act was enacted there is manifestly no existing service known as the Indian Civil Service. The members of the Indian Civil Service who were appointed by the Secretary of State for India became members of the Indian Administrative service, but their rights in the matter of condition of service as respects remuneration, leave and pension stood guaranteed by Art.314.\nthe conferral of independence on India brought about an automatic and legal termination of service on the date of Independence (2) all persons previously holding civil posts in India are deemed to have been appointed and hence to continue in service, except those governed by General or special orders arrangements affecting their respective case (3) the guarantee about prior conditions of service and the previous statutory safe guards relating to disciplinary action continues to apply to those who are thus deemed to continue in service but not to others and (4) those previously holding civil posts in India had the right, and were in fact given the option, of declining to continue in service under the new regime and in the event of their exercising that option they ceased to serve on and from the date of the passing of the constitution. Under the Statutory Rules framed in 1924 passage benefits granted to persons employed in the Indian Civil Service, their wives and children were expressly made part of the salary or remuneration. Under the amendment of 1926, these passage benefits acquired the character of allowance, privilege or facility of office. By the Act of 1935 (s. 247) privileges, inter alia as to remuneration under the Government of India Act of 1919 were expressly guaranteed in favour of the members of the India civil Services.\nBy the Indian Independence Act 1947, a similar guarantee in respect of conditions of service as respects remuneration was also conferred and by s. 19(4) of that Act remuneration was defined as inclusive of pay, allowances or privileges or facilities payable in kind. By Art. 314 of the Constitution, the conditions of service, prior to the Constitutions respects remuneration, leave and pension of the members of the Indian Civil Service were protected.\nThere is no definition of remuneration the Constitution, but that is not a ground for holding that the expression is used in any limited sense as merely salary. The expression remuneration, in its ordinary connotation means reward, recompense, pay, wages or salary for service rendered In R. v. Postmaster General (1) Blackbrun, J., observed, I think the word remuneration means a quid pro quo. If a man gives his services whatever consideration he gets for giving his services seems to be a remuneration for them. Consequently, I think if a person was in receipt of a Payment, or in receipt of a percentage, or any kind of payment which would not be actual money payment, the amount he would receive annually in respect of this would be remuneration. The expression remuneration appears to have been used in the Constitution in this wide connotation.\nAs already observed, the right to passage was originally made part of the salary, but under the Rules framed in 1926, the provision for setting apart a fixed sum of money as salary out of the General Passage Fund was altered and passages were credited to the account of members of Civil services and debited and when they were availed of out of the general Revenue of the State. This alteration was made merely for administrative convenience and did not alter the character of the benefit. Under the Rules of 1924, the provision for passage port of the remuneration and it continued to be such even after the amendment of the Rules in 1926 The right to passage benefits was statutory, and was under the Indian Independence Act in the nature of an allowance, or in any event privilege or facility paid in kind. It was expressly made part of the remuneration earned by the numbers of the Indian Civil Service. The Conditions of service as to remuneration having been guaranteed, the right to this benefit remained guaranteed to those members of the Indian Civil Service who were entitled to it before the Constitutions. This guarantee which was continued in force even after the Commencement of the Constitution was for the first time by Rules made in June 1957 by retrospective amendment of the Statutory Rules from July 12, 1956 sought to be cancelled. But the central Government in exercise of Rule making power was incompetent to destroy or cancel a constitutional guarantee.", + "expert_2": "The respondent then arranged to travel to the United Kingdom and on June 20, 1956, obtained passage certificates from the Accountant General, Bihar. On July 12,1956, the respondent was informed that the Govt. of India were of the opinion that the passage benefits admissible to officers of Indian domicile under the said Statutory Rules, were inconsistent with the existing circumstances and it was decided, with effect from the date of issue of the order that the benefits shall cease and the passage accounts of Indian Officers of the former Secretary of State Services shall be closed and passage credit left over will lapse to the Government. On February 5, 1957, the Government of India framed, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-s. (1) of s. 3 of the All India Services Act, 61 of 1951, the All India Services (Overseas Pay, Passage and Leave Salary) Rules, 1957. By cl. 3 of the Rules passage benefits provided by the statutory Rules ceased with retrospective effect from July 12, 1956, to apply to the members of the Indian Civil Service.\nfiled a petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution for a writ in the nature of mandamus against the Accountant General, Bihar, commanding him to pay the prescribed passage money in respect of the respondents wife and children out of the amounts which stood to their credit in the General Passage Fund Account and to issue appropriate direction, order or writ in that behalf. This petition was granted by the High Court and a writ of mandamus as prayed was issued.\nWhereas by the Rules as originally framed in 1924 an additional salary of Rs. 50/- per mensem was awarded to each officer as passage pay which was to be credited to the General Passage Fund out of which passage benefits to officers were provided, according to the scheme of the Rules as amended in 1926, a separate passage account was to be maintained for each officer for the maximum benefits prescribed by Rule 3 and the disbursement in respect thereof were to be made of the General Revenue of the State.\nBy the amendment made in the Rules in 1926, the passage benefit ceased to be a part of the salary and became an allowance or privilege.\nThe conditions of the to which members of the Indian Civil Service were entiled under the Government of India Act, 1919, were guaranteed to them by s.247(1) of the Government of India Act, 1935.\nThe proviso makes it abundantly clear that the power to make rules cannot be exercised by the Secretary of State so as to give to any officer of the class specified terms less favorable as respects remuneration or pension than were given to him by the rules in force on the date on which he was first appointed to his service or to his post.\nBy Art. 314 of the Constitution, persons who were appointed by the Secretary of State or Secretary of State in Council to a civil service of the Crown in India and continue on and after the commencement of the Constitution to serve under the Government of India or of a State were to receive from the Government of India and the Government of the State which they were from time to time serving, the same conditions of service as respects remuneration leave as pension which they were entitled to immediately before such commencement.\nThe Parliament of India enacted the All India Services Act, 61 of 1951, to regulate the recruitment, and the conditions of service of persons appointed, to the all India Services common to the Union and the States\nBy s. 4 it was provided that all rules in force immediately before the commencement of the Act and applicable to an All India Service were to continue to by in force and were to be deemed to be rules made under the Act. On September 8, 1954, the Central Government framed rules called the Indian Administrative Services Recruiting Rules and by Rule 2(d) the members of the Indian Civil Service who continued to serve on and after the commencement of the Constitution were to be regarded for the purpose of the rules as members of the Indian Administrative Service.\nThe only question which falls to be determined in this appeal is whether cl. 3 of the All India Services (overseas Pay, Passage and Leave Salary) Rules, 1957, was competently enacted, having regard to the guarantee contained in Art. 314 of the constitution as to the conditions of service as respects remuneration, leave and pension of the persons appointed by the Secretary of State or Secretary of State for India in Council to a civil service of the Crown in India.\nthe guarantee about prior conditions of service and the previous statutory safe guards relating to disciplinary action continues to apply to those who are thus deemed to continue in service but not to others\nBy the Act of 1935 (s. 247) privileges, inter alia as to remuneration under the Government of India Act of 1919 were expressly guaranteed in favour of the members of the India civil Services.\nBy the Indian Independence Act 1947, a similar guarantee in respect of conditions of service as respects remuneration was also conferred and by s. 19(4) of that Act remuneration was defined as inclusive of pay, allowances or privileges or facilities payable in kind.\nBy Art. 314 of the Constitution, the conditions of service, prior to the Constitutions respects remuneration, leave and pension of the members of the Indian Civil Service were protected. There is no definition of remuneration the Constitution, but that is not a ground for holding that the expression is used in any limited sense as merely salary.\nIf a man gives his services whatever consideration he gets for giving his services seems to be a remuneration for them. Consequently, I think if a person was in receipt of a Payment, or in receipt of a percentage, or any kind of payment which would not be actual money payment, the amount he would receive annually in respect of this would be remuneration. The expression remuneration appears to have been used in the Constitution in this wide connotation.\nthe right to passage was originally made part of the salary, but under the Rules framed in 1926, the provision for setting apart a fixed sum of money as salary out of the General Passage Fund was altered and passages were credited to the account of members of Civil services and debited and when they were availed of out of the general Revenue of the State. This alteration was made merely for administrative convenience and did not alter the character of the benefit.\nUnder the Rules of 1924, the provision for passage port of the remuneration and it continued to be such even after the amendment of the Rules in 1926 The right to passage benefits was statutory, and was under the Indian Independence Act in the nature of an allowance, or in any event privilege or facility paid in kind.\nThe Conditions of service as to remuneration having been guaranteed, the right to this benefit remained guaranteed to those members of the Indian Civil Service who were entitled to it before the Constitutions.\nThis guarantee which was continued in force even after the Commencement of the Constitution was for the first time by Rules made in June 1957 by retrospective amendment of the Statutory Rules from July 12, 1956 sought to be cancelled. But the central Government in exercise of Rule making power was incompetent to destroy or cancel a constitutional guarantee.", + "expert_3": "After passing the competitive examination held in London in August, 1924 the respondent N. bakshi was admitted in November, 1924 to the Indian Civil Service and was, after his arrival in India, posted in the Province of Bihar. He continued to serve in the State of Bihar after independence\nOn February 3, 1956, the respondent enquired of the Accountant General of Bihar about the number of passages to which he and the members of his family were entitled under the Superior Civil Services (Revision of Pay and Pension) Rules, 1924-hereinafter called the Statutory Rules. The Accountant General, by letter dated March 6, 1956, stated that 284-6 s. stood in the respondents credit 341-3-5d. stood in the account of his wife and 138 stood credited in the separate accounts of each of his four children. The respondent then arranged to travel to the United Kingdom and on June 20, 1956, obtained passage certificates from the Accountant General, Bihar\nOn July 12,1956, the respondent was informed that the Govt. of India were of the opinion that the passage benefits admissible to officers of Indian domicile under the said Statutory Rules, were inconsistent with the existing circumstances and it was decided, with effect from the date of issue of the order that the benefits shall cease and the passage accounts of Indian Officers of the former Secretary of State Services shall be closed and passage credit left over will lapse to the Government. On February 5, 1957, the Government of India framed, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-s. (1) of s. 3 of the All India Services Act, 61 of 1951, the All India Services (Overseas Pay, Passage and Leave Salary) Rules, 1957.\nBy cl. 3 of the Rules passage benefits provided by the statutory Rules ceased with retrospective effect from July 12, 1956, to apply to the members of the Indian Civil Service. The appellant protested against the cancellation of the passage benefits for himself and the members of his family. The Government of India waived the original order of July 12, 1956, in favour of the respondent and ordered that he be granted passage benefit for himself but declined to relax the order in favour of the wife and children of the respondent\nThe respondent accompanied by his wife and children proceeded to the United Kingdom as originally arranged and on his return filed a petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution for a writ in the nature of mandamus against the Accountant General, Bihar, commanding him to pay the prescribed passage money in respect of the respondents wife and children out of the amounts which stood to their credit in the General Passage Fund Account and to issue appropriate direction, order or writ in that behalf. This petition was granted by the High Court and a writ of mandamus as prayed was issued\nThe Accountant General and the Union of India have appealed to this Court against the order with certificate of fitness granted by the High Court.\nThe Statutory Rules were framed by the Secretary of State for India-in-Council under s.96B(2) and (3) of the Government of India Act, 1919, on December 9, 1924. Rule 12 of the Statutory Rules provides \n In addition to the pay prescribed by these Rules passage pay shall be granted at the rates and subject to the conditions set out in Schedule IV, to the members of the services and holders of appointments enumerated in Appendix A to that Schedule. Schedule IV appended to the Regulations set out an elaborate scheme for maintaining accounts of the passage pay and for disbursement thereof\nRegulations 3, 5, 6(1),8,9 and 14, which are the material regulations stood as follows- \n There shall be payable to every officer with effect from the 1st day of April, 1924 passage pay at the rate of Rs. 50 per mensem or such different rate as the Governor General in Council may by order declare to be necessary or sufficient for the purpose of the provision of the benefits conferred by these regulations. A sum equal to the amount received by an officer as passage pay shall be deducted monthly from the officers pay or leave salary, as the case may be, and shall be credited to a General Passage Fund to be administered by the Governor-General in Council. 6 (1)The maximum benefits to which officer shall be entitled shall be passages of a total value equal to the cost of the number of passages between Bombay and London by P\nO., 1st Class B, shown below- \n A separate account shall be opened in sterling in the case of each officer, and, if such officer is married, for his wife, and, if he has children, for each child. These accounts shall be credited respectively with the cost of the passages to which the officer, his wife and children are entitled under Regulation 6 \n No person whosoever shall have any claim on the General Passage Fund beyond the provision of the benefits, if any, conferred on him by these regulations and any balance remaining at the credit of any person after such person has ceased to be eligible for any such benefits shall lapse to the Fund. Passage benefit provided under Rule 12 was clearly part of the salary to be paid out of a fund called the General Passage Fund which was formed out of the passage pay\nRule 12, as amended, reads as follows- \n In addition to the pay prescribed by these Rules, passages shall be granted, subject to the conditions set out in Schedule IV, to the members of the services and holders of appointments enumerated in Appendix A to that Schedule. The Regulations under Sch. IV were, after the amendment, called Revision of Pay, Passage and Pension Regulations\nThe effect of these amendments was that instead of allowing as part of salary, passage pay of Rs. 50/- and carrying over that amount to the credit of the officer concerned in the General Passage Fund, by cl. 6 of the Regulations it was directed that a separate passage account be opened for each officer and if he be married for his wife and children, if any\nSubject to Regulations, the accounts wire to be credited respectively with the number of passages to which the officer, his wife and children were entitled under the new regulations. Within the limits of these credits, the officer was entitled to draw for himself, his wife and his children respectively the port of a journey between a port in India and a port outside Asia.\nBy the amendment made in the Rules in 1926, the passage benefit ceased to be a part of the salary and became an allowance or privilege.\nThe respondent obtained benefit of these passages in 1930, 1950-51 and 1952-53 for himself and the members of his family. In 1957 he has not granted the passage benefit for his wife and his children, and he has filed this petition under Art. 226 for an order that the Union of India and the Accountant General do carry out their Statutory obligations\nThe conditions of the to which members of the Indian Civil Service were entiled under the Government of India Act, 1919, were guaranteed to them by s.247(1) of the Government of India Act, 1935. That Section provided 247 (1). The conditions of service of all persons appointed to a civil service or civil post by the Secretary of State shall- (a) as respects pay, leave and pension and general rights in regard to medical attendance, be such as may be prescribed by rules to be made by the Secretary of State (b) as respects other matters with respect to which express provision is not made by this chapter, be such as may be prescribed by rules to be made by the Secretary of State in so far as he thinks fit to make such rules, and, in so far and so long as provision is not made by such rules, by rules to be made, as respects persons serving in connection with the affairs of the Federation, by the Governor-General or some person or persons authorised by the Governor- general to make rule for the purpose and, as respects persons serving in connection with the affairs of a Province, by the Governor of the Province or some person or persons authorised by the Governor to make rules for the purpose Provided that no rule made under this sub-Section shall have effect so as to give to any person appointed to a civil service or civil post by the Secretary of State less favorable terms as respect remuneration or pension than were given to him by the rules is force on the date on which he was first appointed to his service or was appointed to his post.\nThe proviso makes it abundantly clear that the power to make rules cannot be exercised by the Secretary of State so as to give to any officer of the class specified terms less favorable as respects remuneration or pension than were given to him by the rules in force on the date on which he was first appointed to his service or to his post\nThis guarantee was confirmed by s. 10, sub.s. (2) of the Indian Independence Act, 1947, wherein it was provided, in so far as it is material, that Every person who- (a) havining been appointed by the Secretary of State or Secretary of State in Council, to a civil service of the Crown in India continues on and after the appointed day to serve under the Government of either of the new Dominions or of any province or part thereof or (b) shall be entitled to receive from the Governments of the Dominions and Provinces or parts which he is from time to time serving or, as the case may be the same conditions of service as respects remuneration, leave and pension, and the same rights as respects disciplinary matters or as the case may be, as respects the tenure of his office, or rights as similar thereto as changed circumstances may permit, as that person was entitled to immediately before the appointed day. The expression remuneration was defined in s.19(4) of that Act as inclusive of leave pay, allowances and the cost of any privileges or facilities provided in kind. By Art. 314 of the Constitution, persons who were appointed by the Secretary of State or Secretary of State in Council to a civil service of the Crown in India and continue on and after the commencement of the Constitution to serve under the Government of India or of a State were to receive from the Government of India and the Government of the State which they were from time to time serving, the same conditions of service as respects remuneration leave as pension which they were entitled to immediately before such commencement. The Parliament of India enacted the All India Services Act, 61 of 1951, to regulate the recruitment, and the conditions of service of persons appointed, to the all India Services common to the Union and the States, and by s. 3 of that Act the central Government was authorised to make rules for the regulation of recruitment, and the conditions of service of persons appointed, to the All India Service\nBy s. 4 it was provided that all rules in force immediately before the commencement of the Act and applicable to an All India Service were to continue to by in force and were to be deemed to be rules made under the Act\nOn September 8, 1954, the Central Government framed rules called the Indian Administrative Services Recruiting Rules and by Rule 2(d) the members of the Indian Civil Service who continued to serve on and after the commencement of the Constitution were to be regarded for the purpose of the rules as members of the Indian Administrative Service\nOn February 15, 1957, the All India Services Overseas Pay, Passage and Leave Salary Rules, 1957, were promulgated in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-s (1) of s.3 of the All India Services Act, 1951, and thereby passage benefits in favour of the members of the Indian Administrative Service, who were originally members of the Indian Civil Service were cancelled\nThe only question which falls to be determined in this appeal is whether cl. 3 of the All India Services (overseas Pay, Passage and Leave Salary) Rules, 1957, was competently enacted, having regard to the guarantee contained in Art. 314 of the constitution as to the conditions of service as respects remuneration, leave and pension of the persons appointed by the Secretary of State or Secretary of State for India in Council to a civil service of the Crown in India.\nSince the All India Services Act was enacted there is manifestly no existing service known as the Indian Civil Service. The members of the Indian Civil Service who were appointed by the Secretary of State for India became members of the Indian Administrative service, but their rights in the matter of condition of service as respects remuneration, leave and pension stood guaranteed by Art.314.\nUnder the Statutory Rules framed in 1924 passage benefits granted to persons employed in the Indian Civil Service, their wives and children were expressly made part of the salary or remuneration. Under the amendment of 1926, these passage benefits acquired the character of allowance, privilege or facility of office\nThere is no definition of remuneration the Constitution, but that is not a ground for holding that the expression is used in any limited sense as merely salary. The expression remuneration, in its ordinary connotation means reward, recompense, pay, wages or salary for service rendered\nBlackbrun, J., observed, I think the word remuneration means a quid pro quo. If a man gives his services whatever consideration he gets for giving his services seems to be a remuneration for them. Consequently, I think if a person was in receipt of a Payment, or in receipt of a percentage, or any kind of payment which would not be actual money payment, the amount he would receive annually in respect of this would be remuneration\nThe expression remuneration appears to have been used in the Constitution in this wide connotation\nAs already observed, the right to passage was originally made part of the salary, but under the Rules framed in 1926, the provision for setting apart a fixed sum of money as salary out of the General Passage Fund was altered and passages were credited to the account of members of Civil services and debited and when they were availed of out of the general Revenue of the State. This alteration was made merely for administrative convenience and did not alter the character of the benefit\nUnder the Rules of 1924, the provision for passage port of the remuneration and it continued to be such even after the amendment of the Rules in 1926 The right to passage benefits was statutory, and was under the Indian Independence Act in the nature of an allowance, or in any event privilege or facility paid in kind. It was expressly made part of the remuneration earned by the numbers of the Indian Civil Service. The Conditions of service as to remuneration having been guaranteed, the right to this benefit remained guaranteed to those members of the Indian Civil Service who were entitled to it before the Constitutions\nThis guarantee which was continued in force even after the Commencement of the Constitution was for the first time by Rules made in June 1957 by retrospective amendment of the Statutory Rules from July 12, 1956 sought to be cancelled. But the central Government in exercise of Rule making power was incompetent to destroy or cancel a constitutional guarantee.", + "expert_4": "This is an appeal against the judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Patna from an order commanding the Accountant General of Bihar, Ranchi, to pay certain passage allowance due under the Superior Civil Services (Revision of Pay and Pension) Rules, 1924, to the wife and the children of the respondent.\nAfter passing the competitive examination held in London in August, 1924 the respondent N. bakshi was admitted in November, 1924 to the Indian Civil Service and was, after his arrival in India, posted in the Province of Bihar.\nHe continued to serve in the State of Bihar after independence.\nThe Accountant General, by letter dated March 6, 1956, stated that 284-6 s. stood in the respondents credit 341-3-5d. stood in the account of his wife and 138 stood credited in the separate accounts of each of his four children. The respondent then arranged to travel to the United Kingdom and on June 20, 1956, obtained passage certificates from the Accountant General, Bihar.\nOn July 12,1956, the respondent was informed that the Govt. of India were of the opinion that the passage benefits admissible to officers of Indian domicile under the said Statutory Rules, were inconsistent with the existing circumstances and it was decided, with effect from the date of issue of the order that the benefits shall cease and the passage accounts of Indian Officers of the former Secretary of State Services shall be closed and passage credit left over will lapse to the Government.\nBy cl. 3 of the Rules passage benefits provided by the statutory Rules ceased with retrospective effect from July 12, 1956, to apply to the members of the Indian Civil Service.\nThe Government of India waived the original order of July 12, 1956, in favour of the respondent and ordered that he be granted passage benefit for himself but declined to relax the order in favour of the wife and children of the respondent. The respondent accompanied by his wife and children proceeded to the United Kingdom as originally arranged and on his return filed a petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution for a writ in the nature of mandamus against the Accountant General, Bihar, commanding him to pay the prescribed passage money in respect of the respondents wife and children out of the amounts which stood to their credit in the General Passage Fund Account and to issue appropriate direction, order or writ in that behalf.\nThis petition was granted by the High Court and a writ of mandamus as prayed was issued.\nThe Accountant General and the Union of India have appealed to this Court against the order with certificate of fitness granted by the High Court.\nTo appreciate the grounds on which the impugned order was made it is necessary to refer to the Statutory Rules for passage benefit framed in 1924 by the Secretary of State in Council and the amendments thereof in the light of constitutional development since that date.\nRule 12 of the Statutory Rules provides \n In addition to the pay prescribed by these Rules passage pay shall be granted at the rates and subject to the conditions set out in Schedule IV, to the members of the services and holders of appointments enumerated in Appendix A to that Schedule. Schedule IV appended to the Regulations set out an elaborate scheme for maintaining accounts of the passage pay and for disbursement thereof.\nPassage benefit provided under Rule 12 was clearly part of the salary to be paid out of a fund called the General Passage Fund which was formed out of the passage pay.\nSeveral amendments were made to these Rules from time to time, but we are concerned with the amendments made by Notifications No. F-178/11/1/24 dated October 5, 1925, and No. F-17-15/26 dated June 16, 1926.\nThe effect of these amendments was that instead of allowing as part of salary, passage pay of Rs. 50/- and carrying over that amount to the credit of the officer concerned in the General Passage Fund, by cl. 6 of the Regulations it was directed that a separate passage account be opened for each officer and if he be married for his wife and children, if any.\nWithin the limits of these credits, the officer was entitled to draw for himself, his wife and his children respectively the port of a journey between a port in India and a port outside Asia.\nWhereas by the Rules as originally framed in 1924 an additional salary of Rs. 50/- per mensem was awarded to each officer as passage pay which was to be credited to the General Passage Fund out of which passage benefits to officers were provided, according to the scheme of the Rules as amended in 1926, a separate passage account was to be maintained for each officer for the maximum benefits prescribed by Rule 3 and the disbursement in respect thereof were to be made of the General Revenue of the State.\nBy the amendment made in the Rules in 1926, the passage benefit ceased to be a part of the salary and became an allowance or privilege.\nThe respondent obtained benefit of these passages in 1930, 1950-51 and 1952-53 for himself and the members of his family.\nIn 1957 he has not granted the passage benefit for his wife and his children, and he has filed this petition under Art. 226 for an order that the Union of India and the Accountant General do carry out their Statutory obligations.\nThe conditions of the to which members of the Indian Civil Service were entiled under the Government of India Act, 1919, were guaranteed to them by s.247(1) of the Government of India Act, 1935.\nThat Section provided 247 (1). The conditions of service of all persons appointed to a civil service or civil post by the Secretary of State shall- (a) as respects pay, leave and pension and general rights in regard to medical attendance, be such as may be prescribed by rules to be made by the Secretary of State (b) as respects other matters with respect to which express provision is not made by this chapter, be such as may be prescribed by rules to be made by the Secretary of State in so far as he thinks fit to make such rules, and, in so far and so long as provision is not made by such rules, by rules to be made, as respects persons serving in connection with the affairs of the Federation, by the Governor-General or some person or persons authorised by the Governor- general to make rule for the purpose and, as respects persons serving in connection with the affairs of a Province, by the Governor of the Province or some person or persons authorised by the Governor to make rules for the purpose Provided that no rule made under this sub-Section shall have effect so as to give to any person appointed to a civil service or civil post by the Secretary of State less favorable terms as respect remuneration or pension than were given to him by the rules is force on the date on which he was first appointed to his service or was appointed to his post.\nThe proviso makes it abundantly clear that the power to make rules cannot be exercised by the Secretary of State so as to give to any officer of the class specified terms less favorable as respects remuneration or pension than were given to him by the rules in force on the date on which he was first appointed to his service or to his post.\nThis guarantee was confirmed by s. 10, sub.s. (2) of the Indian Independence Act, 1947, wherein it was provided, in so far as it is material, that Every person who- (a) havining been appointed by the Secretary of State or Secretary of State in Council, to a civil service of the Crown in India continues on and after the appointed day to serve under the Government of either of the new Dominions or of any province or part thereof or (b) shall be entitled to receive from the Governments of the Dominions and Provinces or parts which he is from time to time serving or, as the case may be the same conditions of service as respects remuneration, leave and pension, and the same rights as respects disciplinary matters or as the case may be, as respects the tenure of his office, or rights as similar thereto as changed circumstances may permit, as that person was entitled to immediately before the appointed day.\nThe expression remuneration was defined in s.19(4) of that Act as inclusive of leave pay, allowances and the cost of any privileges or facilities provided in kind.\nBy Art. 314 of the Constitution, persons who were appointed by the Secretary of State or Secretary of State in Council to a civil service of the Crown in India and continue on and after the commencement of the Constitution to serve under the Government of India or of a State were to receive from the Government of India and the Government of the State which they were from time to time serving, the same conditions of service as respects remuneration leave as pension which they were entitled to immediately before such commencement. The Parliament of India enacted the All India Services Act, 61 of 1951, to regulate the recruitment, and the conditions of service of persons appointed, to the all India Services common to the Union and the States, and by s. 3 of that Act the central Government was authorised to make rules for the regulation of recruitment, and the conditions of service of persons appointed, to the All India Service. By s. 4 it was provided that all rules in force immediately before the commencement of the Act and applicable to an All India Service were to continue to by in force and were to be deemed to be rules made under the Act.\nOn September 8, 1954, the Central Government framed rules called the Indian Administrative Services Recruiting Rules and by Rule 2(d) the members of the Indian Civil Service who continued to serve on and after the commencement of the Constitution were to be regarded for the purpose of the rules as members of the Indian Administrative Service.\nOn February 15, 1957, the All India Services Overseas Pay, Passage and Leave Salary Rules, 1957, were promulgated in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-s (1) of s.3 of the All India Services Act, 1951, and thereby passage benefits in favour of the members of the Indian Administrative Service, who were originally members of the Indian Civil Service were cancelled.\nThe only question which falls to be determined in this appeal is whether cl. 3 of the All India Services (overseas Pay, Passage and Leave Salary) Rules, 1957, was competently enacted, having regard to the guarantee contained in Art. 314 of the constitution as to the conditions of service as respects remuneration, leave and pension of the persons appointed by the Secretary of State or Secretary of State for India in Council to a civil service of the Crown in India.\nThe members of the Indian Civil Service who were appointed by the Secretary of State for India became members of the Indian Administrative service, but their rights in the matter of condition of service as respects remuneration, leave and pension stood guaranteed by Art.314.\nIn dealing with the status of the members of the former Indian Civil Service since the Indian Independence Act, 1947, this Court in State of Madras v. K. M.\nRajagopalan (1) held that (1) the conferral of independence on India brought about an automatic and legal termination of service on the date of Independence (2) all persons previously holding civil posts in India are deemed to have been appointed and hence to continue in service, except those governed by General or special orders arrangements affecting their respective case (3) the guarantee about prior conditions of service and the previous statutory safe guards relating to disciplinary action continues to apply to those who are thus deemed to continue in service but not to others and (4) those previously holding civil posts in India had the right, and were in fact given the option, of declining to continue in service under the new regime and in the event of their exercising that option they ceased to serve on and from the date of the passing of the constitution.\nUnder the Statutory Rules framed in 1924 passage benefits granted to persons employed in the Indian Civil Service, their wives and children were expressly made part of the salary or remuneration.\nUnder the amendment of 1926, these passage benefits acquired the character of allowance, privilege or facility of office.\nBy the Act of 1935 (s. 247) privileges, inter alia as to remuneration under the Government of India Act of 1919 were expressly guaranteed in favour of the members of the India civil Services.\nBy the Indian Independence Act 1947, a similar guarantee in respect of conditions of service as respects remuneration was also conferred and by s. 19(4) of that Act remuneration was defined as inclusive of pay, allowances or privileges or facilities payable in kind.\nThere is no definition of remuneration the Constitution, but that is not a ground for holding that the expression is used in any limited sense as merely salary.\nThe expression remuneration, in its ordinary connotation means reward, recompense, pay, wages or salary for service rendered In R. v. Postmaster General (1) Blackbrun, J., observed, I think the word remuneration means a quid pro quo. If a man gives his services whatever consideration he gets for giving his services seems to be a remuneration for them.\nConsequently, I think if a person was in receipt of a Payment, or in receipt of a percentage, or any kind of payment which would not be actual money payment, the amount he would receive annually in respect of this would be remuneration.\nThe expression remuneration appears to have been used in the Constitution in this wide connotation.\nAs already observed, the right to passage was originally made part of the salary, but under the Rules framed in 1926, the provision for setting apart a fixed sum of money as salary out of the General Passage Fund was altered and passages were credited to the account of members of Civil services and debited and when they were availed of out of the general Revenue of the State. This alteration was made merely for administrative convenience and did not alter the character of the benefit.\nUnder the Rules of 1924, the provision for passage port of the remuneration and it continued to be such even after the amendment of the Rules in 1926 The right to passage benefits was statutory, and was under the Indian Independence Act in the nature of an allowance, or in any event privilege or facility paid in kind.\nIt was expressly made part of the remuneration earned by the numbers of the Indian Civil Service.\nThe Conditions of service as to remuneration having been guaranteed, the right to this benefit remained guaranteed to those members of the Indian Civil Service who were entitled to it before the Constitutions.\nThis guarantee which was continued in force even after the Commencement of the Constitution was for the first time by Rules made in June 1957 by retrospective amendment of the Statutory Rules from July 12, 1956 sought to be cancelled. But the central Government in exercise of Rule making power was incompetent to destroy or cancel a constitutional guarantee.", + "expert_5": "There shall be payable to every officer with effect from the 1st day of April, 1924 passage pay at the rate of Rs. 50 per mensem or such different rate as the Governor General in Council may by order declare to be necessary or sufficient for the purpose of the provision of the benefits conferred by these regulations. A sum equal to the amount received by an officer as passage pay shall be deducted monthly from the officers pay or leave salary, as the case may be, and shall be credited to a General Passage Fund to be administered by the Governor-General in Council. 6 (1)The maximum benefits to which officer shall be entitled shall be passages of a total value equal to the cost of the number of passages between Bombay and London by P. O., 1st Class B, shown below- \n A separate account shall be opened in sterling in the case of each officer, and, if such officer is married, for his wife, and, if he has children, for each child. These accounts shall be credited respectively with the cost of the passages to which the officer, his wife and children are entitled under Regulation 6 \n No person whosoever shall have any claim on the General Passage Fund beyond the provision of the benefits, if any, conferred on him by these regulations and any balance remaining at the credit of any person after such person has ceased to be eligible for any such benefits shall lapse to the Fund.\nPassage benefit provided under Rule 12 was clearly part of the salary to be paid out of a fund called the General Passage Fund which was formed out of the passage pay.\nIn addition to the pay prescribed by these Rules, passages shall be granted, subject to the conditions set out in Schedule IV, to the members of the services and holders of appointments enumerated in Appendix A to that Schedule.\nThe effect of these amendments was that instead of allowing as part of salary, passage pay of Rs. 50/- and carrying over that amount to the credit of the officer concerned in the General Passage Fund, by cl. 6 of the Regulations it was directed that a separate passage account be opened for each officer and if he be married for his wife and children, if any.\nWhereas by the Rules as originally framed in 1924 an additional salary of Rs. 50/- per mensem was awarded to each officer as passage pay which was to be credited to the General Passage Fund out of which passage benefits to officers were provided, according to the scheme of the Rules as amended in 1926, a separate passage account was to be maintained for each officer for the maximum benefits prescribed by Rule 3 and the disbursement in respect thereof were to be made of the General Revenue of the State.\nBy the amendment made in the Rules in 1926, the passage benefit ceased to be a part of the salary and became an allowance or privilege.\nThe conditions of the to which members of the Indian Civil Service were entiled under the Government of India Act, 1919, were guaranteed to them by s.247(1) of the Government of India Act, 1935.\nThe conditions of service of all persons appointed to a civil service or civil post by the Secretary of State shall- (a) as respects pay, leave and pension and general rights in regard to medical attendance, be such as may be prescribed by rules to be made by the Secretary of State (b) as respects other matters with respect to which express provision is not made by this chapter, be such as may be prescribed by rules to be made by the Secretary of State in so far as he thinks fit to make such rules, and, in so far and so long as provision is not made by such rules, by rules to be made, as respects persons serving in connection with the affairs of the Federation, by the Governor-General or some person or persons authorised by the Governor- general to make rule for the purpose and, as respects persons serving in connection with the affairs of a Province, by the Governor of the Province or some person or persons authorised by the Governor to make rules for the purpose\nProvided that no rule made under this sub-Section shall have effect so as to give to any person appointed to a civil service or civil post by the Secretary of State less favorable terms as respect remuneration or pension than were given to him by the rules is force on the date on which he was first appointed to his service or was appointed to his post.\nThe proviso makes it abundantly clear that the power to make rules cannot be exercised by the Secretary of State so as to give to any officer of the class specified terms less favorable as respects remuneration or pension than were given to him by the rules in force on the date on which he was first appointed to his service or to his post.\nThis guarantee was confirmed by s. 10, sub.s. (2) of the Indian Independence Act, 1947\nEvery person who- (a) havining been appointed by the Secretary of State or Secretary of State in Council, to a civil service of the Crown in India continues on and after the appointed day to serve under the Government of either of the new Dominions or of any province or part thereof or (b) shall be entitled to receive from the Governments of the Dominions and Provinces or parts which he is from time to time serving or, as the case may be the same conditions of service as respects remuneration, leave and pension, and the same rights as respects disciplinary matters or as the case may be, as respects the tenure of his office, or rights as similar thereto as changed circumstances may permit, as that person was entitled to immediately before the appointed day.\nThe expression remuneration was defined in s.19(4) of that Act as inclusive of leave pay, allowances and the cost of any privileges or facilities provided in kind.\nBy Art. 314 of the Constitution, persons who were appointed by the Secretary of State or Secretary of State in Council to a civil service of the Crown in India and continue on and after the commencement of the Constitution to serve under the Government of India or of a State were to receive from the Government of India and the Government of the State which they were from time to time serving, the same conditions of service as respects remuneration leave as pension which they were entitled to immediately before such commencement.\nBy s. 4 it was provided that all rules in force immediately before the commencement of the Act and applicable to an All India Service were to continue to by in force and were to be deemed to be rules made under the Act.\nThe members of the Indian Civil Service who were appointed by the Secretary of State for India became members of the Indian Administrative service, but their rights in the matter of condition of service as respects remuneration, leave and pension stood guaranteed by Art.314.\nthis Court in State of Madras v. K. M. Rajagopalan (1) held that (1) the conferral of independence on India brought about an automatic and legal termination of service on the date of Independence (2) all persons previously holding civil posts in India are deemed to have been appointed and hence to continue in service, except those governed by General or special orders arrangements affecting their respective case (3) the guarantee about prior conditions of service and the previous statutory safe guards relating to disciplinary action continues to apply to those who are thus deemed to continue in service but not to others and (4) those previously holding civil posts in India had the right, and were in fact given the option, of declining to continue in service under the new regime and in the event of their exercising that option they ceased to serve on and from the date of the passing of the constitution.\nUnder the Statutory Rules framed in 1924 passage benefits granted to persons employed in the Indian Civil Service, their wives and children were expressly made part of the salary or remuneration.\nBy the Act of 1935 (s. 247) privileges, inter alia as to remuneration under the Government of India Act of 1919 were expressly guaranteed in favour of the members of the India civil Services.\nBy the Indian Independence Act 1947, a similar guarantee in respect of conditions of service as respects remuneration was also conferred\nby s. 19(4) of that Act remuneration was defined as inclusive of pay, allowances or privileges or facilities payable in kind.\nBy Art. 314 of the Constitution, the conditions of service, prior to the Constitutions respects remuneration, leave and pension of the members of the Indian Civil Service were protected.\nThere is no definition of remuneration the Constitution, but that is not a ground for holding that the expression is used in any limited sense as merely salary.\nThe expression remuneration, in its ordinary connotation means reward, recompense, pay, wages or salary for service rendered In R. v. Postmaster General (1) Blackbrun, J., observed, I think the word remuneration means a quid pro quo.\nIf a man gives his services whatever consideration he gets for giving his services seems to be a remuneration for them. Consequently, I think if a person was in receipt of a Payment, or in receipt of a percentage, or any kind of payment which would not be actual money payment, the amount he would receive annually in respect of this would be remuneration.\nThe expression remuneration appears to have been used in the Constitution in this wide connotation.\nThis alteration was made merely for administrative convenience and did not alter the character of the benefit.\nThe right to passage benefits was statutory, and was under the Indian Independence Act in the nature of an allowance, or in any event privilege or facility paid in kind.\nIt was expressly made part of the remuneration earned by the numbers of the Indian Civil Service.\nThe Conditions of service as to remuneration having been guaranteed, the right to this benefit remained guaranteed to those members of the Indian Civil Service who were entitled to it before the Constitutions.\nBut the central Government in exercise of Rule making power was incompetent to destroy or cancel a constitutional guarantee." + }, + "1961_417": { + "expert_1": "This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and decree of the High of Judicature at Nagpur confirming the judgment of the 2nd Additional District Judge, Jabalpur in Civil Suit No. 9-A of 1942, filed by respondents 2 to 7 herein claiming to be the reversioners of the estate of one Raja Ajitsingh. Ajit Singh was the Raja of Saliya Estate consisting of 73 villages and other property situate in Jabalpur and Saugor Districts. Ajit Singh died on January 2, 1910, leaving behind him two widows named Rani Khuman Kuar and Rani Anant Kuar and an illegitimate son named Ramraghuraj Singh. Rani Anant Kuar died in or about 1914 and Rani Khuman Kuar passed away on February 1, 1922. After the death of Raja Ajit Singh, the Estate was taken over by the Court of Wards on behalf of the widows in the year 1913 and remained in its possession till March 27, 1923. After the death of Rani Khuman Kuar, the local Government issued a notification recognizing Ramraghuraj Singh as the successor to the Estate but, for one reason or other, the Court of Wards continued to manage the Estate on his behalf from September 23, 1923. Ramraghuraj Singh died on April 23, 1932, and on his death the, first respondent, the son of Ramraghuraj Singh, was, declared as the ward of the Court of Wards which continued to manage the Estate on his behalf Respondents 2 to 6, claiming to be the reversioners to the Estate of Raja Ajit Singh, filed a suit on June 15, 1935, for recovery of possession of the Estate. \nAppellants 1 and 2 are alleged to be the assignees pendente lite of the interest of the alleged reversioners. The plaintiffs averred that RamraLhurai Singh was the son of one Jhutti by her husband one Sukhai and that as Raja Ajit Singh had no issue, he and the Ranies treated the boy as their son, that the Lodhi community to which Raja Ajit Singh belonged was not a sudra caste and that, therefore, even if Ramraghuraj Singh was the illegitimate son of Raja Ajit Singh, he was not entitled to a share, and that in any view half of the share of the widows in the Estate would devolve, on their death, on the reversioners to the exclusion of the illegitimate son. They further pleaded that the possession of the Court of Wards of the entire Estate from January 2, 1910 to February 1, 1922, was adverse to the illegitimate son and, therefore, he lost his title, if any, to the said Estate. The case of the first respondent was that Raja Ajit Singh belonged to the sudra caste, that Ramraghuraj Singh was the son of the said Raja by a continuously and exclusively kept concubine named Raj Dulari, that the widows never questioned the right of Ramraghuraj Singh to a share in the property of Raja Ajit Singh, that therefore there was no scope for the plea of adverse possession, and that, after the death of the widows, the succession to the Estate of Raja Ajit Singh in respect of one half share opened out and the illegitimate son, he being the nearest heir, succeeded to that share also. The trial court as well as the High Court concurrently gave the following findings (1) Raja Ajit Singh belonged to the sudra caste (2) Raja Raghuraj Singh was the son of Raja Ajit Singh by a continuously and exclusively kept concubine by name Raj Dulari, who had passed into the coneubinage of Raja Ajit Singh after the death of her husband (3) as the illegitimate son of Raja Ajit Singh, Ramraghuraj Singh succeeded to a moiety of the Estate of his putative father and the two widows of Raja Ajit Singh succeeded to the other moiety of his Estate (4) as there was no daughter or daughters son, after the death of the widows, Ramraghuraj Singh, being the sole surviving heir of his putative father, inherited a moiety of the Estate which was held by the widows during their lifetime.\n Ramraghuraj Singh was all along in joint possession of the Estate with the widows, and, although the Court of Wards had assumed superintendence on behalf of the Ranies, he was not out of possession during their lifetime and as such his title could not be extinguished by adverse possession (6) the plaintiffs suit was barred under s. 26 of the Central Provinces Court of Wards Act and (7) the plaintiffs claim was barred by limitation. While the trial court held that it had not been established that the plaintiffs were the reversioners of Raja Ajit Singh, the High Court held that it had been proved. In the result the trial court dismissed the suit and, on appeal, the High Court confirmed it. The 2nd appellant died and his legal representatives were not brought on record and the appeal so far as the 2nd appellant is concerned has abated. The 1st appellant alone proceeded with the appeal.\nIt is the usual practice of this Court to accept the concurrent findings of the courts below. There are no exceptional circumstances in this case, at any rate none was brought to our notice, to compel us to depart from the usual practice. We, therefore, accept the concurrent findings, namely, that Raja Ajit Singh was a member of the sudra caste and that Ramraghuraj Singh was the son of Raja Ajit Singh by a continuously and exclusively kept concubine named Raj Dulari, who passed into his concubinage after the death of her husband. The main question that arises in this appeal is whether an illegitimate son of a sudra vis-a-vis his-selfacquired property, after having succeeded to a half share of his putative fathers estate, will be entitled to succeed to the other half share got by the widow, after the succession opened out to his putative father on the death of the said widow. The answer to the question depends upon the content of the right of an illegitimate son to succeed to the self-acquired property of his putative father. The source of his right is found in the relevant Hindu Law texts.\nNo mention of a widow is found in the above verses, but in Dattaka Chandrika, the author says in V. 30,31 thus If any, even in the series of heirs down to the daughters son, exist, the son by a female slave does not take the whole estate, but on the contrary shares equally with such heir.\nNow it is observable that the first verse shews that during the lifetime of the father the law leaves the son to take a share by his fathers choice, and it cannot be said that at his birth he acquires any right to share in the estate in the same way as a legitimate son would do. But the language there is very distinct, that if the father be dead the bre- thren should make him partaker of the moiety of a share. So in the second verse the words are that the brothers are to allow him to participate for half a share, and later on there is the same expression The son of the female slave participates for half a share only. On that interpretation, he accepted the view of the Bombay High Court and held that an illegitimate son and a legitimate son, being members of an undivided Hindu family governed by Mitakshara, the illegitimate son becomes entitled to the whole of the immoveable property of the family if the legitimate son dies without any male issue.\nThe Judicial Committee again considered the right of an illegitimate son in Kamulammal v. Visvanathaswami Naicker (2). There it was held that in a competition between a widow and an illegitimate son to the property of his putative father, the illegitimate son takes half of the (1) (1890) L.R. 17 I.A. 128. (2) (1922) L.R. 50 I.A. 32. property and the widow the other half.\nFrom the premises it follows that an illegitimate son, except to the extent circumscribed by the. Hindu Law texts, has the status of a son and is heir to the self-acquired property of his putative father. If that be his undoubted right under the Hindu Law, on what principle can he be deprived of his right of succession to the other moiety of his fathers property after the death of the widow?\nUnder the Hindu Law, the death of the widow opens inheritance to the reversioners and the nearest heir at the time to the last full owner becomes entitled to possession. When the succession opens, in a competition between an illegitimate son and other reversioners, the illegitimate son is certainly a nearer heir to the last male holder than the other reversioners. If he was the nearest heir only yielding half a share to the widow at the time of the death of his putative father, how does he cease to be one by the intervention of the widows estate? As on the death of the widow the estate reverts back to the last male holder, the succession shall be traced to him, and, if so traced, the illegitimate son has a preferential claim over all other reversioners.\nThe illegitimate Bon, though he inherits on the death of his putative father, along with or in default of male issue, widow or daughter, cannot come in as a reversionary heir on the death of the widow or daughter, as he is undoubtedly neither a sagotra nor a bhinnagotra sapinda of the last, male-holder within the text of Manu. \nWe regret our inability to accept this proposition. for, if accepted, we would be speaking in two voices. Once it is established that for the purpose of succession an illegitimate son of a Sudra has the status of a son and that he is entitled to succeed to his putative fathers entire self-acquired property in the absence of a son, widow, daughter or daughters son and to a share along with them, we cannot see any escape from the consequential and logical position that he shall be entitled to succeed to the other half share when succession opens after the widows death. The intervention of the widow only postpones the opening of succession to the extent of half share but it cannot divert the succession through a different channel, for she cannot constitute herself a new stock of descent.\nThe principle underlying the doctrine of reverter referred to is that the last male- holders estate is inherited by females who have no free right of alienation and who hold a peculiar kind of estate called womans estate and on whose death the then heir of the last male-holder succeeds to the last male-holders estate. From its very nature, the doctrine could not apply legitimately to a case where the last male-holders estate vested on his death not in a female heir but in a male heir also. In such a case, the doctrine as such would not strictly apply, nor has it been, so far as we are aware, applied to such a case. (1) (1932) I.L.R. 55 Mad. 856. The reason of the decision is therefore clear and that is when a daughters son succeeds to an estate, there is no further scope for the application of the doctrine of reverter. The learned Judges expressly left open the present question when they said, We are not now concerned with the question as to what would become of the property if the last of the daughters died without leaving a daughter son, in such circumstances. This decision cannot, therefore, be invoked in support of the contention that in a case where the doctrine of reverter applies the illegitimate son is excluded from succession. On the other hand, the Nagpur High Court in Bhagwantrao v. Punjaram (1) rightly came to the conclusion that where on a partition between a legitimate and an illegitimate son, the widow was allotted a share, on her death the illegitimate son was entitled to a share in the property.\nWe, therefore, hold that on the death of the widow, the illegitimate son, the father of the first respondent herein, succeeded to the other half share of the estate of his putative father Raja Ajit Singh.\nIt is. next contended that the widows acquired an absolute interest in the estate of Raja. Ajit Singh by adverse possession and, therefore, the property would devolve not on Raja Ajit Singhs heirs but on the heirs of the widows. On the question of adverse possession also, both the courts below have held against the appellant. But learned counsel argued that in the circumstances of this case the said find- ing was a mixed question of fact and law. It was said that the courts below missed the point that the Court of Wards, representing the widows, held the Estate adversely to Ramraghuraj Singh in respect of his half share and, therefore, the fact that during its management the widows did not deny the title of Ramraghuraj Singh or the fact that they admitted his title could not affect the question of adverse possession\nAssuming that learned counsel for the appellant was correct in his contention, we fail to see how the said legal position would advance the appellants case, for the Court of Wards admittedly managed only the I.L.R. 1938 Nag. 255. widows limited estate and it is not the case of the appellant that the Court of Wards acquired on behalf of the widows an absolute interest in respect of the half share of Ramraghuraj Singh in the suit properties. The plaintiffs themselves claimed to hereversioners of Raja Ajit Singh on the ground that the succession to him opened out when the widows died and if their contention be accepted, namely, that the widows acquired an absolute interest in half of the property, they would be non-suited in respect thereof on the simple ground that their suit was not to recover the property as the heirs of the widows. But, as we have pointed out, the widows would have acquired a title by adverse possession in respect of the share of Ramraghuraj Singh only in their capacity as owners of a limited estate i.e., in regard to their half share they held it as widows estate and in respect of the other half-share of Ramraghuraj Singh they acquired a right by adverse possession only a limited estate therein.", + "expert_2": "The main question that arises in this appeal is whether an illegitimate son of a sudra vis-a-vis his-selfacquired property, after having succeeded to a half share of his putative fathers estate, will be entitled to succeed to the other half share got by the widow, after the succession opened out to his putative father on the death of the said widow.\nKamulammal v. Visvanathaswami Naicker (2). There it was held that in a competition between a widow and an illegitimate son to the property of his putative father, the illegitimate son takes half of the (1) (1890) L.R. 17 I.A. 128. (2) (1922) L.R. 50 I.A. 32. property and the widow the other half. Sir Lawrence Jenkins observed at p. 37 thus Here the contest is between the illegitimate son and the widow, and though the widow is not named in the text it is well settled that as a preferential heir to the daughters son she is included among those who share with the illegitimate son, and it would serve no useful purpose to speculate why she was not mentioned in the text.\nThe law pertaining to the right of inheritance of an illegitimate son to his putative fathers self-acquired property may be stated, thus An illegitimate son has the status of a son under the Hindu Law and he is a member of the family.\nUnder the Hindu Law, the death of the widow opens inheritance to the reversioners and the nearest heir at the time to the last full owner becomes entitled to possession. When the succession opens, in a competition between an illegitimate son and other reversioners, the illegitimate son is certainly a nearer heir to the last male holder than the other reversioners.\nAs on the death of the widow the estate reverts back to the last male holder, the succession shall be traced to him, and, if so traced, the illegitimate son has a preferential claim over all other reversioners.\nOnce it is established that for the purpose of succession an illegitimate son of a Sudra has the status of a son and that he is entitled to succeed to his putative fathers entire self-acquired property in the absence of a son, widow, daughter or daughters son and to a share along with them, we cannot see any escape from the consequential and logical position that he shall be entitled to succeed to the other half share when succession opens after the widows death.\nThe intervention of the widow only postpones the opening of succession to the extent of half share but it cannot divert the succession through a different channel, for she cannot constitute herself a new stock of descent.\nthe Nagpur High Court in Bhagwantrao v. Punjaram (1) rightly came to the conclusion that where on a partition between a legitimate and an illegitimate son, the widow was allotted a share, on her death the illegitimate son was entitled to a share in the property. We, therefore, hold that on the death of the widow, the illegitimate son, the father of the first respondent herein, succeeded to the other half share of the estate of his putative father Raja Ajit Singh.\nthe widows would have acquired a title by adverse possession in respect of the share of Ramraghuraj Singh only in their capacity as owners of a limited estate i.e., in regard to their half share they held it as widows estate and in respect of the other half-share of Ramraghuraj Singh they acquired a right by adverse possession only a limited estate therein.", + "expert_3": "Ajit Singh was the Raja of Saliya Estate consisting of 73 villages and other property situate in Jabalpur and Saugor Districts. Ajit Singh died on January 2, 1910, leaving behind him two widows named Rani Khuman Kuar and Rani Anant Kuar and an illegitimate son named Ramraghuraj Singh. Rani Anant Kuar died in or about 1914 and Rani Khuman Kuar passed away on February 1, 1922\nAfter the death of Raja Ajit Singh, the Estate was taken over by the Court of Wards on behalf of the widows in the year 1913 and remained in its possession till March 27, 1923. After the death of Rani Khuman Kuar, the local Government issued a notification recognizing Ramraghuraj Singh as the successor to the Estate but, for one reason or other, the Court of Wards continued to manage the Estate on his behalf from September 23, 1923\nRamraghuraj Singh died on April 23, 1932, and on his death the, first respondent, the son of Ramraghuraj Singh, was, declared as the ward of the Court of Wards which continued to manage the Estate on his behalf Respondents 2 to 6, claiming to be the reversioners to the Estate of Raja Ajit Singh, filed a suit on June 15, 1935, for recovery of possession of the Estate\nThe plaintiffs averred that RamraLhurai Singh was the son of one Jhutti by her husband one Sukhai and that as Raja Ajit Singh had no issue, he and the Ranies treated the boy as their son, that the Lodhi community to which Raja Ajit Singh belonged was not a sudra caste and that, therefore, even if Ramraghuraj Singh was the illegitimate son of Raja Ajit Singh, he was not entitled to a share, and that in any view half of the share of the widows in the Estate would devolve, on their death, on the reversioners to the exclusion of the illegitimate son. They further pleaded that the possession of the Court of Wards of the entire Estate from January 2, 1910 to February 1, 1922, was adverse to the illegitimate son and, therefore, he lost his title, if any, to the said Estate\nThe trial court as well as the High Court concurrently gave the following findings (1) Raja Ajit Singh belonged to the sudra caste (2) Raja Raghuraj Singh was the son of Raja Ajit Singh by a continuously and exclusively kept concubine by name Raj Dulari, who had passed into the coneubinage of Raja Ajit Singh after the death of her husband (3) as the illegitimate son of Raja Ajit Singh, Ramraghuraj Singh succeeded to a moiety of the Estate of his putative father and the two widows of Raja Ajit Singh succeeded to the other moiety of his Estate (4) as there was no daughter or daughters son, after the death of the widows, Ramraghuraj Singh, being the sole surviving heir of his putative father, inherited a moiety of the Estate which was held by the widows during their lifetime.\n Ramraghuraj Singh was all along in joint possession of the Estate with the widows, and, although the Court of Wards had assumed superintendence on behalf of the Ranies, he was not out of possession during their lifetime and as such his title could not be extinguished by adverse possession (6) the plaintiffs suit was barred under s. 26 of the Central Provinces Court of Wards Act and (7) the plaintiffs claim was barred by limitation\nWhile the trial court held that it had not been established that the plaintiffs were the reversioners of Raja Ajit Singh, the High Court held that it had been proved. In the result the trial court dismissed the suit and, on appeal, the High Court confirmed it\nThe 1st appellant alone proceeded with the appeal. It is the usual practice of this Court to accept the concurrent findings of the courts below. There are no exceptional circumstances in this case, at any rate none was brought to our notice, to compel us to depart from the usual practice. We, therefore, accept the concurrent findings, namely, that Raja Ajit Singh was a member of the sudra caste and that Ramraghuraj Singh was the son of Raja Ajit Singh by a continuously and exclusively kept concubine named Raj Dulari, who passed into his concubinage after the death of her husband.\nThe main question that arises in this appeal is whether an illegitimate son of a sudra vis-a-vis his-selfacquired property, after having succeeded to a half share of his putative fathers estate, will be entitled to succeed to the other half share got by the widow, after the succession opened out to his putative father on the death of the said widow.\nThe answer to the question depends upon the content of the right of an illegitimate son to succeed to the self-acquired property of his putative father\nMitakshara in explanation of the texts of Manu and Yajnavalkya says in Chapter 1, s. 12, in the following three verses thus \n The author next delivers a special rule concerning the partition of a Sudras goods. Even a son begotten by a Sudra on a female slave may take a share by the fathers choice. But, if the father be dead, the brethren should make him partaker of the moiety of a share and one, who has no brothers, may inherit the whole property, in default of daughters sons.\nThe son, begotten by a Sudra on a female slave, obtains a share by the fathers choice, or at his pleasure. But, after the demise of the father, if there be sons of a wedded wife, let these brothers allow the son of the female slave to participate for half a share that is, let them give him half as much as is the amount of one brothers allotment\nHowever, should there be no sons of a wedded wife, the son of the female slave takes the whole estate, provided there be no daughters of a wife, nor sons of daughters. But, if there be such the son of the female slave participates for half a share only\nFrom the mention of a Sudra in this place it follows that the son begotten by a man of a regenerate tribe on a female slave, does not obtain a share even by the fathers choice, nor the whole estate after his demise. But, if he be docile, he receives a simple maintenance\nNo mention of a widow is found in the above verses, but in Dattaka Chandrika, the author says in V. 30,31 thus If any, even in the series of heirs down to the daughters son, exist, the son by a female slave does not take the whole estate, but on the contrary shares equally with such heir\nThe leading decision on the rights of an illegitimate son is that of the Judicial Committee in Raja Jogendra Bhupati Hurri Chundun Mahapatra v. Nityanund Mansingh (1). There, one Raja died leaving behind him a legitimate son and an illegitimate son. On the death of the legitimate son, who had succeeded to the Raja, it was held that the illegitimate son succeeded to him by survivorship.\nCommenting upon these verses, the learned Judge observed at P. 132 thus Now it is observable that the first verse shews that during the lifetime of the father the law leaves the son to take a share by his fathers choice, and it cannot be said that at his birth he acquires any right to share in the estate in the same way as a legitimate son would do. But the language there is very distinct, that if the father be dead the bre- thren should make him partaker of the moiety of a share. So in the second verse the words are that the brothers are to allow him to participate for half a share, and later on there is the same expression The son of the female slave participates for half a share only. On that interpretation, he accepted the view of the Bombay High Court and held that an illegitimate son and a legitimate son, being members of an undivided Hindu family governed by Mitakshara, the illegitimate son becomes entitled to the whole of the immoveable property of the family if the legitimate son dies without any male issue\nThe Judicial Committee again considered the right of an illegitimate son in Kamulammal v. Visvanathaswami Naicker (2). There it was held that in a competition between a widow and an illegitimate son to the property of his putative father, the illegitimate son takes half of the (1) (1890) L.R. 17 I.A. 128. (2) (1922) L.R. 50 I.A. 32. property and the widow the other half.\nThe status of the illegitimate son was subject of further scrutiny by the Privy Council in Vellaiyappa Chetty v. Natarajan (1). There the question arose in the context of an illegitimate sons right to maintenance from a joint family property after the death of his father who left no separate property. The Judicial Committee held that he was entitled as a member of the family to maintenance out of the joint family property in the hands of the collaterals with whom the father was joint\nOn a consideration of the texts and the cases on the subject their Lordships are of opinion that the illegitimate son of a Sudra by a continuous concubine has the status of a son, and that he is a member of the family that the share of inheritance given to him is not merely in lieu of maintenance, but in recognition of his status as a son\nThe law pertaining to the right of inheritance of an illegitimate son to his putative fathers self-acquired property may be stated, thus An illegitimate son has the status of a son under the Hindu Law and he is a member of the family. But his rights are limited compared to those of a son born in wedlock. He has no right by birth and, therefore, he cannot demand partition during his fathers lifetime\nDuring the lifetime of his father, the law allows the illegitimate son to take (1) (1931) I.L. R. 55 Mad. 1. only such share as his father may give him\nBut on his fathers death, he takes his fathers self-acquired property along with the legitimate son and in case the legitimate son dies, he takes the entire property by survivorship. Even if there is no legitimate son, the illegitimate son would be entitled to a moiety only of his fathers estate when there is a widow, daughter or daughters son of the last male holder. In the absence of any one of the three heirs, he succeeds to the entire estate of his father\nFrom the premises it follows that an illegitimate son, except to the extent circumscribed by the. Hindu Law texts, has the status of a son and is heir to the self-acquired property of his putative father\nUnder the Hindu Law, the death of the widow opens inheritance to the reversioners and the nearest heir at the time to the last full owner becomes entitled to possession. When the succession opens, in a competition between an illegitimate son and other reversioners, the illegitimate son is certainly a nearer heir to the last male holder than the other reversioners.\nAs on the death of the widow the estate reverts back to the last male holder, the succession shall be traced to him, and, if so traced, the illegitimate son has a preferential claim over all other reversioners\nthis position has been controverted in the following manner at p. 637 The illegitimate Bon, though he inherits on the death of his putative father, along with or in default of male issue, widow or daughter, cannot come in as a reversionary heir on the death of the widow or daughter, as he is undoubtedly neither a sagotra nor a bhinnagotra sapinda of the last, male-holder within the text of Manu. \nWe regret our inability to accept this proposition. for, if accepted, we would be speaking in two voices\nOnce it is established that for the purpose of succession an illegitimate son of a Sudra has the status of a son and that he is entitled to succeed to his putative fathers entire self-acquired property in the absence of a son, widow, daughter or daughters son and to a share along with them, we cannot see any escape from the consequential and logical position that he shall be entitled to succeed to the other half share when succession opens after the widows death. The intervention of the widow only postpones the opening of succession to the extent of half share but it cannot divert the succession through a different channel, for she cannot constitute herself a new stock of descent\nOn the other hand, the Nagpur High Court in Bhagwantrao v. Punjaram (1) rightly came to the conclusion that where on a partition between a legitimate and an illegitimate son, the widow was allotted a share, on her death the illegitimate son was entitled to a share in the property\nWe, therefore, hold that on the death of the widow, the illegitimate son, the father of the first respondent herein, succeeded to the other half share of the estate of his putative father Raja Ajit Singh\nIt is. next contended that the widows acquired an absolute interest in the estate of Raja. Ajit Singh by adverse possession and, therefore, the property would devolve not on Raja Ajit Singhs heirs but on the heirs of the widows. On the question of adverse possession also, both the courts below have held against the appellant.\nthe Court of Wards admittedly managed only the I.L.R. 1938 Nag. 255. widows limited estate and it is not the case of the appellant that the Court of Wards acquired on behalf of the widows an absolute interest in respect of the half share of Ramraghuraj Singh in the suit properties. The plaintiffs themselves claimed to hereversioners of Raja Ajit Singh on the ground that the succession to him opened out when the widows died and if their contention be accepted, namely, that the widows acquired an absolute interest in half of the property, they would be non-suited in respect thereof on the simple ground that their suit was not to recover the property as the heirs of the widows. But, as we have pointed out, the widows would have acquired a title by adverse possession in respect of the share of Ramraghuraj Singh only in their capacity as owners of a limited estate i.e., in regard to their half share they held it as widows estate and in respect of the other half-share of Ramraghuraj Singh they acquired a right by adverse possession only a limited estate therein", + "expert_4": "This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and decree of the High of Judicature at Nagpur confirming the judgment of the 2nd Additional District Judge, Jabalpur in Civil Suit No. 9-A of 1942, filed by respondents 2 to 7 herein claiming to be the reversioners of the estate of one Raja Ajitsingh.\nAjit Singh was the Raja of Saliya Estate consisting of 73 villages and other property situate in Jabalpur and Saugor Districts.\nAjit Singh died on January 2, 1910, leaving behind him two widows named Rani Khuman Kuar and Rani Anant Kuar and an illegitimate son named Ramraghuraj Singh.\nAfter the death of Rani Khuman Kuar, the local Government issued a notification recognizing Ramraghuraj Singh as the successor to the Estate but, for one reason or other, the Court of Wards continued to manage the Estate on his behalf from September 23, 1923.\nRamraghuraj Singh died on April 23, 1932, and on his death the, first respondent, the son of Ramraghuraj Singh, was, declared as the ward of the Court of Wards which continued to manage the Estate on his behalf Respondents 2 to 6, claiming to be the reversioners to the Estate of Raja Ajit Singh, filed a suit on June 15, 1935, for recovery of possession of the Estate. \nAppellants 1 and 2 are alleged to be the assignees pendente lite of the interest of the alleged reversioners.\nThe plaintiffs averred that RamraLhurai Singh was the son of one Jhutti by her husband one Sukhai and that as Raja Ajit Singh had no issue, he and the Ranies treated the boy as their son, that the Lodhi community to which Raja Ajit Singh belonged was not a sudra caste and that, therefore, even if Ramraghuraj Singh was the illegitimate son of Raja Ajit Singh, he was not entitled to a share, and that in any view half of the share of the widows in the Estate would devolve, on their death, on the reversioners to the exclusion of the illegitimate son.\nThe case of the first respondent was that Raja Ajit Singh belonged to the sudra caste, that Ramraghuraj Singh was the son of the said Raja by a continuously and exclusively kept concubine named Raj Dulari, that the widows never questioned the right of Ramraghuraj Singh to a share in the property of Raja Ajit Singh, that therefore there was no scope for the plea of adverse possession, and that, after the death of the widows, the succession to the Estate of Raja Ajit Singh in respect of one half share opened out and the illegitimate son, he being the nearest heir, succeeded to that share also.\nThe trial court as well as the High Court concurrently gave the following findings (1) Raja Ajit Singh belonged to the sudra caste (2) Raja Raghuraj Singh was the son of Raja Ajit Singh by a continuously and exclusively kept concubine by name Raj Dulari, who had passed into the coneubinage of Raja Ajit Singh after the death of her husband (3) as the illegitimate son of Raja Ajit Singh, Ramraghuraj Singh succeeded to a moiety of the Estate of his putative father and the two widows of Raja Ajit Singh succeeded to the other moiety of his Estate (4) as there was no daughter or daughters son, after the death of the widows, Ramraghuraj Singh, being the sole surviving heir of his putative father, inherited a moiety of the Estate which was held by the widows during their lifetime.\nRamraghuraj Singh was all along in joint possession of the Estate with the widows, and, although the Court of Wards had assumed superintendence on behalf of the Ranies, he was not out of possession during their lifetime and as such his title could not be extinguished by adverse possession (6) the plaintiffs suit was barred under s. 26 of the Central Provinces Court of Wards Act and (7) the plaintiffs claim was barred by limitation.\nWhile the trial court held that it had not been established that the plaintiffs were the reversioners of Raja Ajit Singh, the High Court held that it had been proved. In the result the trial court dismissed the suit and, on appeal, the High Court confirmed it.\nThe 2nd appellant died and his legal representatives were not brought on record and the appeal so far as the 2nd appellant is concerned has abated.\nIt is the usual practice of this Court to accept the concurrent findings of the courts below. There are no exceptional circumstances in this case, at any rate none was brought to our notice, to compel us to depart from the usual practice.\nWe, therefore, accept the concurrent findings, namely, that Raja Ajit Singh was a member of the sudra caste and that Ramraghuraj Singh was the son of Raja Ajit Singh by a continuously and exclusively kept concubine named Raj Dulari, who passed into his concubinage after the death of her husband.\nThe main question that arises in this appeal is whether an illegitimate son of a sudra vis-a-vis his-selfacquired property, after having succeeded to a half share of his putative fathers estate, will be entitled to succeed to the other half share got by the widow, after the succession opened out to his putative father on the death of the said widow.\nThe answer to the question depends upon the content of the right of an illegitimate son to succeed to the self-acquired property of his putative father.\nThe leading decision on the rights of an illegitimate son is that of the Judicial Committee in Raja Jogendra Bhupati Hurri Chundun Mahapatra v. Nityanund Mansingh\nOn the death of the legitimate son, who had succeeded to the Raja, it was held that the illegitimate son succeeded to him by survivorship.\nhe accepted the view of the Bombay High Court and held that an illegitimate son and a legitimate son, being members of an undivided Hindu family governed by Mitakshara, the illegitimate son becomes entitled to the whole of the immoveable property of the family if the legitimate son dies without any male issue.\nThe Judicial Committee again considered the right of an illegitimate son in Kamulammal v. Visvanathaswami Naicker (2). There it was held that in a competition between a widow and an illegitimate son to the property of his putative father, the illegitimate son takes half of the (1) (1890) L.R. 17 I.A. 128. (2) (1922) L.R. 50 I.A. 32. property and the widow the other half.\nSir Lawrence Jenkins observed at p. 37 thus Here the contest is between the illegitimate son and the widow, and though the widow is not named in the text it is well settled that as a preferential heir to the daughters son she is included among those who share with the illegitimate son, and it would serve no useful purpose to speculate why she was not mentioned in the text.\nThe status of the illegitimate son was subject of further scrutiny by the Privy Council in Vellaiyappa Chetty v. Natarajan (1).\nThe Judicial Committee held that he was entitled as a member of the family to maintenance out of the joint family property in the hands of the collaterals with whom the father was joint.\nOn a consideration of the texts and the cases on the subject their Lordships are of opinion that the illegitimate son of a Sudra by a continuous concubine has the status of a son, and that he is a member of the family that the share of inheritance given to him is not merely in lieu of maintenance, but in recognition of his status as a son It is not necessary to multiply decisions.\nThe law pertaining to the right of inheritance of an illegitimate son to his putative fathers self-acquired property may be stated, thus An illegitimate son has the status of a son under the Hindu Law and he is a member of the family.\nHe has no right by birth and, therefore, he cannot demand partition during his fathers lifetime. During the lifetime of his father, the law allows the illegitimate son to take (1) (1931) I.L. R. 55 Mad. 1. only such share as his father may give him. But on his fathers death, he takes his fathers self-acquired property along with the legitimate son and in case the legitimate son dies, he takes the entire property by survivorship.\nFrom the premises it follows that an illegitimate son, except to the extent circumscribed by the. Hindu Law texts, has the status of a son and is heir to the self-acquired property of his putative father. If that be his undoubted right under the Hindu Law, on what principle can he be deprived of his right of succession to the other moiety of his fathers property after the death of the widow?\nUnder the Hindu Law, the death of the widow opens inheritance to the reversioners and the nearest heir at the time to the last full owner becomes entitled to possession.\nWhen the succession opens, in a competition between an illegitimate son and other reversioners, the illegitimate son is certainly a nearer heir to the last male holder than the other reversioners.\nIf he was the nearest heir only yielding half a share to the widow at the time of the death of his putative father, how does he cease to be one by the intervention of the widows estate?\nAs on the death of the widow the estate reverts back to the last male holder, the succession shall be traced to him, and, if so traced, the illegitimate son has a preferential claim over all other reversioners.\nIn Maynes Hindu Law, 11th edn., this position has been controverted in the following manner at p. 637 The illegitimate Bon, though he inherits on the death of his putative father, along with or in default of male issue, widow or daughter, cannot come in as a reversionary heir on the death of the widow or daughter, as he is undoubtedly neither a sagotra nor a bhinnagotra sapinda of the last, male-holder within the text of Manu.\nWe regret our inability to accept this proposition. for, if accepted, we would be speaking in two voices.\nOnce it is established that for the purpose of succession an illegitimate son of a Sudra has the status of a son and that he is entitled to succeed to his putative fathers entire self-acquired property in the absence of a son, widow, daughter or daughters son and to a share along with them, we cannot see any escape from the consequential and logical position that he shall be entitled to succeed to the other half share when succession opens after the widows death.\nThe intervention of the widow only postpones the opening of succession to the extent of half share but it cannot divert the succession through a different channel, for she cannot constitute herself a new stock of descent.\nThis decision cannot, therefore, be invoked in support of the contention that in a case where the doctrine of reverter applies the illegitimate son is excluded from succession.\nOn the other hand, the Nagpur High Court in Bhagwantrao v. Punjaram (1) rightly came to the conclusion that where on a partition between a legitimate and an illegitimate son, the widow was allotted a share, on her death the illegitimate son was entitled to a share in the property.\nWe, therefore, hold that on the death of the widow, the illegitimate son, the father of the first respondent herein, succeeded to the other half share of the estate of his putative father Raja Ajit Singh.\nIt is. next contended that the widows acquired an absolute interest in the estate of Raja.\nAjit Singh by adverse possession and, therefore, the property would devolve not on Raja Ajit Singhs heirs but on the heirs of the widows.\nOn the question of adverse possession also, both the courts below have held against the appellant.\nBut learned counsel argued that in the circumstances of this case the said find- ing was a mixed question of fact and law.\nIt was said that the courts below missed the point that the Court of Wards, representing the widows, held the Estate adversely to Ramraghuraj Singh in respect of his half share and, therefore, the fact that during its management the widows did not deny the title of Ramraghuraj Singh or the fact that they admitted his title could not affect the question of adverse possession.\nAssuming that learned counsel for the appellant was correct in his contention, we fail to see how the said legal position would advance the appellants case, for the Court of Wards admittedly managed only the I.L.R. 1938 Nag. 255. widows limited estate and it is not the case of the appellant that the Court of Wards acquired on behalf of the widows an absolute interest in respect of the half share of Ramraghuraj Singh in the suit properties.\nas we have pointed out, the widows would have acquired a title by adverse possession in respect of the share of Ramraghuraj Singh only in their capacity as owners of a limited estate i.e., in regard to their half share they held it as widows estate and in respect of the other half-share of Ramraghuraj Singh they acquired a right by adverse possession only a limited estate therein.", + "expert_5": "The trial court as well as the High Court concurrently gave the following findings (1) Raja Ajit Singh belonged to the sudra caste (2) Raja Raghuraj Singh was the son of Raja Ajit Singh by a continuously and exclusively kept concubine by name Raj Dulari, who had passed into the coneubinage of Raja Ajit Singh after the death of her husband (3) as the illegitimate son of Raja Ajit Singh, Ramraghuraj Singh succeeded to a moiety of the Estate of his putative father and the two widows of Raja Ajit Singh succeeded to the other moiety of his Estate (4) as there was no daughter or daughters son, after the death of the widows, Ramraghuraj Singh, being the sole surviving heir of his putative father, inherited a moiety of the Estate which was held by the widows during their lifetime.\n Ramraghuraj Singh was all along in joint possession of the Estate with the widows, and, although the Court of Wards had assumed superintendence on behalf of the Ranies, he was not out of possession during their lifetime and as such his title could not be extinguished by adverse possession\nIt is the usual practice of this Court to accept the concurrent findings of the courts below. There are no exceptional circumstances in this case, at any rate none was brought to our notice, to compel us to depart from the usual practice.\nRaja Ajit Singh was a member of the sudra caste and that Ramraghuraj Singh was the son of Raja Ajit Singh by a continuously and exclusively kept concubine named Raj Dulari, who passed into his concubinage after the death of her husband.\nMitakshara in explanation of the texts of Manu and Yajnavalkya says in Chapter 1, s. 12, in the following three verses thus \n The author next delivers a special rule concerning the partition of a Sudras goods. Even a son begotten by a Sudra on a female slave may take a share by the fathers choice. But, if the father be dead, the brethren should make him partaker of the moiety of a share and one, who has no brothers, may inherit the whole property, in default of daughters sons.\nBut, after the demise of the father, if there be sons of a wedded wife, let these brothers allow the son of the female slave to participate for half a share that is, let them give him half as much as is the amount of one brothers allotment.\nThe leading decision on the rights of an illegitimate son is that of the Judicial Committee in Raja Jogendra Bhupati Hurri Chundun Mahapatra v. Nityanund Mansingh\nhe accepted the view of the Bombay High Court and held that an illegitimate son and a legitimate son, being members of an undivided Hindu family governed by Mitakshara, the illegitimate son becomes entitled to the whole of the immoveable property of the family if the legitimate son dies without any male issue.\nThe Judicial Committee again considered the right of an illegitimate son in Kamulammal v. Visvanathaswami Naicker (2).\nas a preferential heir to the daughters son she is included among those who share with the illegitimate son, and it would serve no useful purpose to speculate why she was not mentioned in the text.\nThe status of the illegitimate son was subject of further scrutiny by the Privy Council in Vellaiyappa Chetty v. Natarajan (1).\nhe was entitled as a member of the family to maintenance out of the joint family property in the hands of the collaterals with whom the father was joint.\nOn a consideration of the texts and the cases on the subject their Lordships are of opinion that the illegitimate son of a Sudra by a continuous concubine has the status of a son, and that he is a member of the family that the share of inheritance given to him is not merely in lieu of maintenance, but in recognition of his status as a son It is not necessary to multiply decisions.\nBut on his fathers death, he takes his fathers self-acquired property along with the legitimate son and in case the legitimate son dies, he takes the entire property by survivorship.\nEven if there is no legitimate son, the illegitimate son would be entitled to a moiety only of his fathers estate when there is a widow, daughter or daughters son of the last male holder.\nIn the absence of any one of the three heirs, he succeeds to the entire estate of his father.\nFrom the premises it follows that an illegitimate son, except to the extent circumscribed by the. Hindu Law texts, has the status of a son and is heir to the self-acquired property of his putative father.\nUnder the Hindu Law, the death of the widow opens inheritance to the reversioners and the nearest heir at the time to the last full owner becomes entitled to possession.\nWhen the succession opens, in a competition between an illegitimate son and other reversioners, the illegitimate son is certainly a nearer heir to the last male holder than the other reversioners.\nIf he was the nearest heir only yielding half a share to the widow at the time of the death of his putative father, how does he cease to be one by the intervention of the widows estate? As on the death of the widow the estate reverts back to the last male holder, the succession shall be traced to him, and, if so traced, the illegitimate son has a preferential claim over all other reversioners.\nOnce it is established that for the purpose of succession an illegitimate son of a Sudra has the status of a son and that he is entitled to succeed to his putative fathers entire self-acquired property in the absence of a son, widow, daughter or daughters son and to a share along with them, we cannot see any escape from the consequential and logical position that he shall be entitled to succeed to the other half share when succession opens after the widows death.\nThe intervention of the widow only postpones the opening of succession to the extent of half share but it cannot divert the succession through a different channel, for she cannot constitute herself a new stock of descent.\nBut a reference to that judgment shows that no such proposition has been laid down therein.\nFrom its very nature, the doctrine could not apply legitimately to a case where the last male-holders estate vested on his death not in a female heir but in a male heir also. In such a case, the doctrine as such would not strictly apply, nor has it been, so far as we are aware, applied to such a case. (1) (1932) I.L.R. 55 Mad. 856.\nThe learned Judges expressly left open the present question when they said, We are not now concerned with the question as to what would become of the property if the last of the daughters died without leaving a daughter son, in such circumstances.\nthe Nagpur High Court in Bhagwantrao v. Punjaram (1) rightly came to the conclusion that where on a partition between a legitimate and an illegitimate son, the widow was allotted a share, on her death the illegitimate son was entitled to a share in the property.\nWe, therefore, hold that on the death of the widow, the illegitimate son, the father of the first respondent herein, succeeded to the other half share of the estate of his putative father Raja Ajit Singh.\nOn the question of adverse possession also, both the courts below have held against the appellant.\nthe Court of Wards admittedly managed only the I.L.R. 1938 Nag. 255. widows limited estate and it is not the case of the appellant that the Court of Wards acquired on behalf of the widows an absolute interest in respect of the half share of Ramraghuraj Singh in the suit properties.\nthe widows would have acquired a title by adverse possession in respect of the share of Ramraghuraj Singh only in their capacity as owners of a limited estate i.e., in regard to their half share they held it as widows estate and in respect of the other half-share of Ramraghuraj Singh they acquired a right by adverse possession only a limited estate therein." + }, + "1962_105": { + "expert_1": "The High Court of Judicature at Bombay answered in the affirmative the following two questions which were referred by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Bombay, under sections 66(2) of the Income-tax Act.\n Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was justified in law in adding to the total income of the assessee the sum of Rs. 1,45,706 and or Rs. 48,185 or any part thereof ? Whether there was any material on record to support the finding that Rs. 1,45,706 and or 48,185 or any part thereof represent the income of the assessee ? With special leave the assessees, Messrs. C. Vasantlal Co., have appealed to this court.\nThe Appellate Assistant Commissioner summoned these two persons to appear before him and permitted the assessees to cross examine them. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner held that the transaction in cotton which were entered in the books of accounts of the assessees were not genuine but the assessees had merely acted as brokers or mediators, Joitram Kedarnath and Bhawanji Lakhmichand having directly bought losses from Messrs. Meghaji Kapurchand and Messrs. Bhimaji Motiji. He, therefore, directed that an amount of Rs. 1,94,890 be excluded in computing the assessees total income. The department appealed against the order of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Bombay. \nThe Tribunal reversed the order passed by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and restored the order passed by the Income-tax Officer. The Tribunal under the direction of the High Court of Bombay submitted a statement of the case and referred the two questions set out hereinbefore. The High Court after an exhaustive review of the evidence held that there was material on the record to support the findings of the Tribunal that the sums of Rs. 1,45,706 and Rs. 48,185 which were the subject-matter of the reference represented the income of the assessees.\nIn the light of these findings and the refusal of the assessees to examine Joitram Kedarnath in support of their case that the latter had received payments from the assessees as claimed, the Tribunal agreed with the view of the Income-tax Officer.\nBy the two questions referred, the High Court was called upon to advise the Tribunal whether there was any material on the record to support the finding that the amount of Rs. 1,45,706 and Rs. 48,185 represented the income of the assessees. Counsel for the assessees in this appeal has contended that the statements of Achaldas and Poonamchand who were examined by the Income-tax Officer in the absence of the assessees could not be regarded as evidence against the assessees and that the only legal evidence on the record was the statement of these witnesses before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and therein the witnesses absolved the assessees from any complicity in the transactions.\nWe are unable to hold that the statements made by Achaldas and Poonamchand before the Income-tax Officer were not material on which the Tribunal could act.\nThe income-tax authorities held that the transactions were not genuine transactions. Again the evidence of Achaldas and Poonamchand clearly showed that these amounts were repaid. In the statements made by these two persons before the Income- tax Officer it was asserted that the repayment of the amounts of the cheques was made to the assessees. \nBefore the Appellate Assistant Commissioner they stated that they handed over the moneys to some other persons whose presence could not be procured. There is nothing on the record to show that the Income-tax Officer had not disclosed to the assessees the material he had collected by examining Achaldas and Poonamchand. In any event, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner in the interest of justice and fair play gave the assessees an opportunity to cross-examine these two persons. The Income-tax Officer is not bound by any technical rules of the law of evidence. It is open to him to collect materials to facilitates assessment even by private enquiry. But if he desires to use the material so collected, the assessee must be informed of the material and must be given an adequate opportunity of explaining it. The statements made by Achaldas and Poonamchand before the Income-tax Officer were material on which the income-tax authorities could act provided that the material was disclosed and the assessees had opportunity to render their explanation in that behalf. It was therefore open to the Tribunal in appreciating the evidence to rely upon the statements made by Achaldas and Poonamchand before the Income-tax Officer and to disbelieve the statements made by them before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. The jurisdiction of the High Court under section 66 of the Income-tax Act is merely advisory. The High Court does not sit in appeal over the judgment of the income-tax authorities it is not concerned to decide whether the conclusion of the Tribunal on appreciation of evidence is correct. There was apparently a mass of evidence on which the conclusion of the Appellate Tribunal could be founded and the question which fell to be determined by it was purely one of fact.\nIt is true that a finding of fact which is not supported by any evidence or is unreasonable and perverse may be open to challenge on the ground that it is not supported by any material on the record, but, as we have already observed, there was material on which the Income-tax Tribunal could reasonably arrive at the conclusion which it did. The High Court was, therefore, right in recording the answers to the two questions submitted to it.", + "expert_2": "The High Court of Judicature at Bombay answered in the affirmative the following two questions which were referred by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Bombay, under sections 66(2) of the Income-tax Act.\n Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was justified in law in adding to the total income of the assessee the sum of Rs. 1,45,706 and or Rs. 48,185 or any part thereof ? Whether there was any material on record to support the finding that Rs. 1,45,706 and or 48,185 or any part thereof represent the income of the assessee ?\nIn the course of proceedings for assessment of income-tax of the assessees, for the assessment year 1947-48, two entries in the assessees books of accounts for Samvat 2002 (which was the previous year for the purpose of assessment) showing payments of Rs. 48,185 and Rs. 1,45,706\nto Messrs. Meghaji Kapurchand and Messrs. Bhimaji Motiji respectively were noticed by the Income-tax Officer.\nThe Appellate Assistant Commissioner held that the transaction in cotton which were entered in the books of accounts of the assessees were not genuine but the assessees had merely acted as brokers or mediators, Joitram Kedarnath and Bhawanji Lakhmichand having directly bought losses from Messrs. Meghaji Kapurchand and Messrs. Bhimaji Motiji. He, therefore, directed that an amount of Rs. 1,94,890 be excluded in computing the assessees total income.\nThe Tribunal reversed the order passed by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and restored the order passed by the Income-tax Officer.\nThat the assessees in the years previous to Samvat 2002 had no transactions with Messrs. Meghaji Kapurchand or with Messrs. Bhimaji Motiji and it was not possible to believe that transactions involving large sums of money would be put through by the assessees in respect of new constituents without taking any deposit or security. That the entries made in the books of accounts of the assessees were suspicious and appeared to have been written not in the usual course of business.\nThat the transactions with Messrs. Meghaji Kapurchand and Messrs. Bhimaji Motiji always showed gains in their favour, there being not a single transactions were they had suffered loss. This in the opinion of the Appellate Tribunal was unrealistic.\nThat Messrs. Meghaji Kapurchand and Messrs. Bhimaji Motiji had encashed the cheques issued by the assessees and admitted that they had paid back the amounts thereof. Before the Income-tax Officer they stated that the amounts of the cheques were returned by them to the assessees but before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner they stated that they had returned those amounts to unknown and unidentifiable parties.\nThe case of the assessees was that the transactions in respect of which they had maintained accounts were genuine transactions and that they had received payment from the parties who suffered losses, and had made it over to the parties who had earned profits. The income-tax authorities held that the transactions were not genuine transactions.\nThe statements made by Achaldas and Poonamchand before the Income-tax Officer were material on which the income-tax authorities could act provided that the material was disclosed and the assessees had opportunity to render their explanation in that behalf.\nIt was therefore open to the Tribunal in appreciating the evidence to rely upon the statements made by Achaldas and Poonamchand before the Income-tax Officer and to disbelieve the statements made by them before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. The jurisdiction of the High Court under section 66 of the Income-tax Act is merely advisory.", + "expert_3": "The High Court of Judicature at Bombay answered in the affirmative the following two questions which were referred by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Bombay, under sections 66(2) of the Income-tax Act.\n Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was justified in law in adding to the total income of the assessee the sum of Rs. 1,45,706 and or Rs. 48,185 or any part thereof ? Whether there was any material on record to support the finding that Rs. 1,45,706 and or 48,185 or any part thereof represent the income of the assessee ? With special leave the assessees, Messrs. C. Vasantlal Co., have appealed to this court\nThe assessees carried on business as commission agents and brokers and also in forward transactions in cotton, bullion and other commodities.\nIn the course of proceedings for assessment of income-tax of the assessees, for the assessment year 1947-48, two entries in the assessees books of accounts for Samvat 2002 (which was the previous year for the purpose of assessment) showing payments of Rs. 48,185 and Rs. 1,45,706 to Messrs. Meghaji Kapurchand and Messrs. Bhimaji Motiji respectively were noticed by the Income-tax Officer\nA partner of the assessees explained that these two parties were their constituents, and had entered into speculative transactions through them as brokers with Bhawanji Lakhmichand and Joitram Kedarnath and that the latter had suffered losses which aggregated to Rs. 12,303 and Rs. 1,81,587 respectively and that the payments to the assessees by the said two persons were passed on to these two constituents.\nThe Income-tax Officer was not satisfied with the explanation and examined Achaldas, a partner of Messrs. Meghaji Kapurchand, and Poonamchand, a partner of Messrs. Bhimaji Motiji\nOn a consideration of the material placed before him the Income-tax Officer held that the entries made in the relevant account books maintained by the assessees were fictitious, and in computing their income disallowed the assessees claim in respect of the amounts of Rs. 1,45,706 and Rs. 48,185. The assessee appealed against the order of assessment to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, Bombay\nIt was urged before that officer that Achaldas and Poonamchand, partners of Messrs. Meghaji Kapurchand and Messrs. Bhimaji Motiji, were examined by the Income-tax Officer in the absence of the assessees and they had no opportunity of cross-examining them\nThe Appellate Assistant Commissioner summoned these two persons to appear before him and permitted the assessees to cross examine them. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner held that the transaction in cotton which were entered in the books of accounts of the assessees were not genuine but the assessees had merely acted as brokers or mediators, Joitram Kedarnath and Bhawanji Lakhmichand having directly bought losses from Messrs\nHe, therefore, directed that an amount of Rs. 1,94,890 be excluded in computing the assessees total income\nThe department appealed against the order of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Bombay. \nThe Tribunal reversed the order passed by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and restored the order passed by the Income-tax Officer. The Tribunal under the direction of the High Court of Bombay submitted a statement of the case and referred the two questions set out hereinbefore.\nThe High Court after an exhaustive review of the evidence held that there was material on the record to support the findings of the Tribunal that the sums of Rs. 1,45,706 and Rs. 48,185 which were the subject-matter of the reference represented the income of the assessees.\nThe Income-tax Appellate Tribunal on a review of the evidence recorded the following findings.\n That the assessees in the years previous to Samvat 2002 had no transactions with Messrs. Meghaji Kapurchand or with Messrs. Bhimaji Motiji and it was not possible to believe that transactions involving large sums of money would be put through by the assessees in respect of new constituents without taking any deposit or security\nThat the entries made in the books of accounts of the assessees were suspicious and appeared to have been written not in the usual course of business\nThat the transactions with Messrs. Meghaji Kapurchand and Messrs. Bhimaji Motiji always showed gains in their favour, there being not a single transactions were they had suffered loss. This in the opinion of the Appellate Tribunal was unrealistic\nThe partners of the two firms had stated before the Income-tax Officer that the transactions were bogus transactions and that they had sold the profits with an ulterior motive\nEven in their statements before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner Achaldas and Poonamchand did not pretend that these transactions were genuine transactions. They merely asserted that the transactions were effected by persons who were not available at the time of the enquiry\nThat Messrs. Meghaji Kapurchand and Messrs. Bhimaji Motiji had encashed the cheques issued by the assessees and admitted that they had paid back the amounts thereof.\nBefore the Income-tax Officer they stated that the amounts of the cheques were returned by them to the assessees but before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner they stated that they had returned those amounts to unknown and unidentifiable parties\nIn the light of these findings and the refusal of the assessees to examine Joitram Kedarnath in support of their case that the latter had received payments from the assessees as claimed, the Tribunal agreed with the view of the Income-tax Officer. By the two questions referred, the High Court was called upon to advise the Tribunal whether there was any material on the record to support the finding that the amount of Rs. 1,45,706 and Rs. 48,185 represented the income of the assessees\nWe are unable to hold that the statements made by Achaldas and Poonamchand before the Income-tax Officer were not material on which the Tribunal could act. The case of the assessees was that the transactions in respect of which they had maintained accounts were genuine transactions and that they had received payment from the parties who suffered losses, and had made it over to the parties who had earned profits\nThe income-tax authorities held that the transactions were not genuine transactions. Again the evidence of Achaldas and Poonamchand clearly showed that these amounts were repaid. In the statements made by these two persons before the Income- tax Officer it was asserted that the repayment of the amounts of the cheques was made to the assessees\nBefore the Appellate Assistant Commissioner they stated that they handed over the moneys to some other persons whose presence could not be procured. There is nothing on the record to show that the Income-tax Officer had not disclosed to the assessees the material he had collected by examining Achaldas and Poonamchand\nIn any event, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner in the interest of justice and fair play gave the assessees an opportunity to cross-examine these two persons\nIt is open to him to collect materials to facilitates assessment even by private enquiry. But if he desires to use the material so collected, the assessee must be informed of the material and must be given an adequate opportunity of explaining it.\nThe statements made by Achaldas and Poonamchand before the Income-tax Officer were material on which the income-tax authorities could act provided that the material was disclosed and the assessees had opportunity to render their explanation in that behalf. It was therefore open to the Tribunal in appreciating the evidence to rely upon the statements made by Achaldas and Poonamchand before the Income-tax Officer and to disbelieve the statements made by them before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner\nThe jurisdiction of the High Court under section 66 of the Income-tax Act is merely advisory. The High Court does not sit in appeal over the judgment of the income-tax authorities it is not concerned to decide whether the conclusion of the Tribunal on appreciation of evidence is correct. There was apparently a mass of evidence on which the conclusion of the Appellate Tribunal could be founded and the question which fell to be determined by it was purely one of fact.\nIt is true that a finding of fact which is not supported by any evidence or is unreasonable and perverse may be open to challenge on the ground that it is not supported by any material on the record, but, as we have already observed, there was material on which the Income-tax Tribunal could reasonably arrive at the conclusion which it did. The High Court was, therefore, right in recording the answers to the two questions submitted to it", + "expert_4": "The High Court of Judicature at Bombay answered in the affirmative the following two questions which were referred by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Bombay, under sections 66(2) of the Income-tax Act.\nWhether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was justified in law in adding to the total income of the assessee the sum of Rs. 1,45,706 and or Rs. 48,185 or any part thereof ? Whether there was any material on record to support the finding that Rs. 1,45,706 and or 48,185 or any part thereof represent the income of the assessee ?\nThe assessees carried on business as commission agents and brokers and also in forward transactions in cotton, bullion and other commodities. In the course of proceedings for assessment of income-tax of the assessees, for the assessment year 1947-48, two entries in the assessees books of accounts for Samvat 2002 (which was the previous year for the purpose of assessment) showing payments of Rs. 48,185 and Rs. 1,45,706 to Messrs.\nMeghaji Kapurchand and Messrs. Bhimaji Motiji respectively were noticed by the Income-tax Officer.\nA partner of the assessees explained that these two parties were their constituents, and had entered into speculative transactions through them as brokers with Bhawanji Lakhmichand and Joitram Kedarnath and that the latter had suffered losses which aggregated to Rs. 12,303 and Rs. 1,81,587 respectively and that the payments to the assessees by the said two persons were passed on to these two constituents.\nOn a consideration of the material placed before him the Income-tax Officer held that the entries made in the relevant account books maintained by the assessees were fictitious, and in computing their income disallowed the assessees claim in respect of the amounts of Rs. 1,45,706 and Rs. 48,185.\nThe assessee appealed against the order of assessment to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, Bombay.\nThe Appellate Assistant Commissioner held that the transaction in cotton which were entered in the books of accounts of the assessees were not genuine but the assessees had merely acted as brokers or mediators, Joitram Kedarnath and Bhawanji Lakhmichand having directly bought losses from Messrs. Meghaji Kapurchand and Messrs. Bhimaji Motiji.\nHe, therefore, directed that an amount of Rs. 1,94,890 be excluded in computing the assessees total income.\nThe department appealed against the order of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Bombay.\nThe Tribunal reversed the order passed by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and restored the order passed by the Income-tax Officer. The Tribunal under the direction of the High Court of Bombay submitted a statement of the case and referred the two questions set out hereinbefore.\nThe High Court after an exhaustive review of the evidence held that there was material on the record to support the findings of the Tribunal that the sums of Rs. 1,45,706 and Rs. 48,185 which were the subject-matter of the reference represented the income of the assessees.\nThe Income-tax Appellate Tribunal on a review of the evidence recorded the following findings.\n That the assessees in the years previous to Samvat 2002 had no transactions with Messrs. Meghaji Kapurchand or with Messrs.\nBhimaji Motiji and it was not possible to believe that transactions involving large sums of money would be put through by the assessees in respect of new constituents without taking any deposit or security.\nThat the entries made in the books of accounts of the assessees were suspicious and appeared to have been written not in the usual course of business.\nThe partners of the two firms had stated before the Income-tax Officer that the transactions were bogus transactions and that they had sold the profits with an ulterior motive.\nThey merely asserted that the transactions were effected by persons who were not available at the time of the enquiry.\nIn the light of these findings and the refusal of the assessees to examine Joitram Kedarnath in support of their case that the latter had received payments from the assessees as claimed, the Tribunal agreed with the view of the Income-tax Officer.\nWe are unable to hold that the statements made by Achaldas and Poonamchand before the Income-tax Officer were not material on which the Tribunal could act.\nThe case of the assessees was that the transactions in respect of which they had maintained accounts were genuine transactions and that they had received payment from the parties who suffered losses, and had made it over to the parties who had earned profits.\nthe evidence of Achaldas and Poonamchand clearly showed that these amounts were repaid.\nThere is nothing on the record to show that the Income-tax Officer had not disclosed to the assessees the material he had collected by examining Achaldas and Poonamchand.\nIn any event, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner in the interest of justice and fair play gave the assessees an opportunity to cross-examine these two persons.\nThe Income-tax Officer is not bound by any technical rules of the law of evidence. It is open to him to collect materials to facilitates assessment even by private enquiry. But if he desires to use the material so collected, the assessee must be informed of the material and must be given an adequate opportunity of explaining it.\nThe statements made by Achaldas and Poonamchand before the Income-tax Officer were material on which the income-tax authorities could act provided that the material was disclosed and the assessees had opportunity to render their explanation in that behalf. It was therefore open to the Tribunal in appreciating the evidence to rely upon the statements made by Achaldas and Poonamchand before the Income-tax Officer and to disbelieve the statements made by them before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner.\nThe jurisdiction of the High Court under section 66 of the Income-tax Act is merely advisory.\nThe High Court does not sit in appeal over the judgment of the income-tax authorities it is not concerned to decide whether the conclusion of the Tribunal on appreciation of evidence is correct.\nThere was apparently a mass of evidence on which the conclusion of the Appellate Tribunal could be founded and the question which fell to be determined by it was purely one of fact. It is true that a finding of fact which is not supported by any evidence or is unreasonable and perverse may be open to challenge on the ground that it is not supported by any material on the record, but, as we have already observed, there was material on which the Income-tax Tribunal could reasonably arrive at the conclusion which it did.\nThe High Court was, therefore, right in recording the answers to the two questions submitted to it.", + "expert_5": "On a consideration of the material placed before him the Income-tax Officer held that the entries made in the relevant account books maintained by the assessees\nOn a consideration of the material placed before him the Income-tax Officer held that the entries made in the relevant account books maintained by the assessees were fictitious, and in computing their income disallowed the assessees claim in respect of the amounts of Rs. 1,45,706 and Rs. 48,185.\nthe transaction in cotton which were entered in the books of accounts of the assessees were not genuine\nThe High Court after an exhaustive review of the evidence held that there was material on the record to support the findings of the Tribunal\nit was not possible to believe that transactions involving large sums of money would be put through by the assessees in respect of new constituents without taking any deposit or security.\nthe entries made in the books of accounts of the assessees were suspicious and appeared to have been written not in the usual course of business.\nthe transactions with Messrs. Meghaji Kapurchand and Messrs. Bhimaji Motiji always showed gains in their favour, there being not a single transactions were they had suffered loss.\nThe partners of the two firms had stated before the Income-tax Officer that the transactions were bogus transactions and that they had sold the profits with an ulterior motive. Even in their statements before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner Achaldas and Poonamchand did not pretend that these transactions were genuine transactions.\nBefore the Income-tax Officer they stated that the amounts of the cheques were returned by them to the assessees but before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner they stated that they had returned those amounts to unknown and unidentifiable parties.\nWe are unable to hold that the statements made by Achaldas and Poonamchand before the Income-tax Officer were not material on which the Tribunal could act.\nThere is nothing on the record to show that the Income-tax Officer had not disclosed to the assessees the material he had collected by examining Achaldas and Poonamchand.\nThe statements made by Achaldas and Poonamchand before the Income-tax Officer were material on which the income-tax authorities could act provided that the material was disclosed and the assessees had opportunity to render their explanation in that behalf.\nThe jurisdiction of the High Court under section 66 of the Income-tax Act is merely advisory. The High Court does not sit in appeal over the judgment of the income-tax authorities it is not concerned to decide whether the conclusion of the Tribunal on appreciation of evidence is correct.\nthere was material on which the Income-tax Tribunal could reasonably arrive at the conclusion which it did. The High Court was, therefore, right in recording the answers to the two questions submitted to it." + }, + "1962_113": { + "expert_1": "Appeal by special leave from the Resolution dated April 21, 1954, of the Board of Revenue, Bihar Patna in Revision Case No. 706 of 1953.\nThis appeal by Special Leave against the order of the Board of Revenue, Bihar, relates to the assessment for the year 1950-51 of Sale Tax of the appellant under the Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1947 (Act 19 of 1947), hereinafter called the Act.\nAgainst this order he took the usual appeals to the Sales Tax Authorities and after the appeals were rejected, he took a revision under s. 24 of the Act before the Board of Revenue, Bihar, where also he was unsuccessful. Under s. 25 of the Act, he applied for referring 6 questions of law to the High court and those questions were as follows- \n Whether upon the true construction of the agreement of 1945 between the State Government and the assessee which had been acted upon and not reviewed, the Department was legally entitled to tax petitioner on his gross turnover instead of 66 2/3 of the same \n Whether Member, Board of Revenue, having held that in the circumstances the petitioner had prima facie bona fide grounds for his belief that the arrangement which the Department had entered into, would continue could legally hold, that the petitioner was not entitled to be assessed in terms of the said arrangement ? Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, it is open to the Department to challenge the continuance of the arrangement arrived at between the State Government and the petitioner especially so when the State Government by its own acts or omissions misled the petitioner into maintaining his accounts in a manner prejudicial to the petitioners claim for deductions on account of sale of tax free goods during the period ? Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner was entitled to the entire deduction on account of sale of meat and fish in terms of Notification No. 5564 Ft. dated 30-3-49 under section 6 of the Bihar Sales Act. 1947 ? Whether the Member Board of Revenue having held that meat and fish mentioned in Notification No. 5564 Ft. dated 30- 3-49 under section 6 of the Bihar Sales Tax, Act. 1947, included boiled meat and fish and cold meat and fish, could legally hold that meat and fish cooked otherwise were not covered in the terms of said notification ? Whether in terms of the Notification No. 5564 Ft. dated 30-3-49 cold meat and fish and boiled meat and fish could be distinguished from other preparation of meat and fish\nBut the Board of Revenue referred the following question to the High Court under s. 6- Whether the following forms of meat and fish are covered by Notification No. 5564 Ft. dated 30-3-49, issued under section 6 of the Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1947 ? Raw (i.e. uncooked in any way) meat or fish. Boiled meat and fish, cooled or uncooled, meant for sale or consumption outside the petitioners premises. Fish or meat, which has been boiled or cooked in some other way served as separate or part of a dish outside the petitioners premises as separate dishes or part of a menu. Fish or meat, which has been boiled or cooked in some other way, served as separate dishes or part of a dish outside the petitioners premises. The High court reframed the question as follows- Whether the petitioner was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 5564 Ft., dated 30th March, 1949, issued under section 6 of the Bihar Sales Act, 1947 with regard to the sales of the preparations of meat and fish e.g., meat curry and fish curry served as separate dishes, or as part of the menu, at lunch or dinner, at the petitioners premises or outside ? and answered it against the appellant. It is against the order of the Board of Revenue that the appellant has come in appeal by special leave but has not appeared against the judgment and order of the High Court.\nThis Court in M s. Chimmonalall Rameshwarlall Commissioner of Income-tax (Central) Calcutta (1) held that in cases where a reference is made to the High Court and the appeal is brought only against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal then the Supreme Court, if it interfered, would in fact be setting aside the judgment of the High Court without there being an appeal to this Court, and that this Court could not bypass the normal procedure which was to be adopted for the purpose. In a later Judgment in Chandi Prasad Chokhani v. State of Bihar (2)a similar view was taken that as the assessee had not obtained Special Leave in respect of any of the orders passed by the High Court under s. 25 those orders became final and binding and the assessee could not be allowed to bypass or go behind the orders of the High Court and such exercise would be particularly inadvisable in a case where the result may be a conflict of the decision of two courts of competent jurisdiction, which was contrary to the object of ss. 23, 24 and 25 of the Act.\nIn this view of the law the appellant is not entitled to agitate the correctness or otherwise of the decision given by the Tribunal in regard to the questions which we agitated before the High Court and were decided against the appellant and against which no appeal has been brought.\nBut he submits that there are three other questions which also arise, and on which the appellant wanted a reference to the High Court but which were not referred. It was open to the appellant to apply to the High Court for a reference under s. 25. That the appellant did not do\nit has not been shown that there was any such breach of the rules of natural justice or violation of any principal of law which would be a good ground for our interference direct with the orders of the Board of Revenue in an appeal under Art. 136 of the Constitution.", + "expert_2": "It is against the order of the Board of Revenue that the appellant has come in appeal by special leave but has not appeared against the judgment and order of the High Court.\nThis Court in M s. Chimmonalall Rameshwarlall Commissioner of Income-tax (Central) Calcutta (1) held that in cases where a reference is made to the High Court and the appeal is brought only against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal then the Supreme Court, if it interfered, would in fact be setting aside the judgment of the High Court without there being an appeal to this Court, and that this Court could not bypass the normal procedure which was to be adopted for the purpose. In a later Judgment in Chandi Prasad Chokhani v. State of Bihar (2)a similar view was taken that as the assessee had not obtained Special Leave in respect of any of the orders passed by the High Court under s. 25 those orders became final and binding and the assessee could not be allowed to bypass or go behind the orders of the High Court and such exercise would be particularly inadvisable in a case where the result may be a conflict of the decision of two courts of competent jurisdiction, which was contrary to the object of ss. 23, 24 and 25 of the Act.\nIn this view of the law the appellant is not entitled to agitate the correctness or otherwise of the decision given by the Tribunal in regard to the questions which we agitated before the High Court and were decided against the appellant and against which no appeal has been brought.\nThat the appellant did not do, and it has not been shown that there was any such breach of the rules of natural justice or violation of any principal of law which would be a good ground for our interference direct with the orders of the Board of Revenue in an appeal under Art. 136 of the Constitution.", + "expert_3": "This appeal by Special Leave against the order of the Board of Revenue, Bihar, relates to the assessment for the year 1950-51 of Sale Tax of the appellant under the Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1947\nThe appellant was a railway caterer, who had Refreshment Rooms and Tea Stalls at various Railway Stations. He sold various kinds of eatables, cigarettes, betels, milk, fruits and tea at railway stations. He was registered as a dealer under the Act and had been carrying on business for a fairly long time\nHis case was that as it was difficult for him to maintain accounts in regard to eatables, some of which were taxable and others were not, he made representation in 1944 to the Bihar Government for some arrangement so that the difficulty in keeping different sets of account would be the obviated. As a result of his representation the Bihar Government by a letter June 5, 1915, agreed that the appellants taxable turnover in Bihar would be taken to be 66 2/3 of the, gross turnover during the quarter ending December 31, 1944, and that this percentage might be revised after December 31, 1945\nAs a result of this letter, the appellant did not keep separate accounts for taxable and non-taxable items and for some of the quarters subsequent to those mentioned in the letter above referred to were also taxed according to the arrangements contained in that letter\nFor the period April 1, 1950, to March 31, 1951, the gross turnover was Rs. 11,16,270-11-0 and the appellant claimed that he be assessed at 66 2/3 of that amount but the Sales Tax officer taxed him on the total gross turnover except for the usual rebate of 4 allowed in such cases. He submitted that in this turnover there were included tax-free articles such as fresh milks, meat, fish, green vegetables etc., which were exempt from Sales tax under s. 6 of the Act. His submission was that the excess amount assessed was Rs. 11,416-15-0.\nAgainst this order he took the usual appeals to the Sales Tax Authorities and after the appeals were rejected, he took a revision under s. 24 of the Act before the Board of Revenue, Bihar, where also he was unsuccessful. Under s. 25 of the Act, he applied for referring 6 questions of law to the High court and those questions were as follows- \n Whether upon the true construction of the agreement of 1945 between the State Government and the assessee which had been acted upon and not reviewed, the Department was legally entitled to tax petitioner on his gross turnover instead of 66 2/3 of the same \n Whether Member, Board of Revenue, having held that in the circumstances the petitioner had prima facie bona fide grounds for his belief that the arrangement which the Department had entered into, would continue could legally hold, that the petitioner was not entitled to be assessed in terms of the said arrangement ?\nWhether in the facts and circumstances of the case, it is open to the Department to challenge the continuance of the arrangement arrived at between the State Government and the petitioner especially so when the State Government by its own acts or omissions misled the petitioner into maintaining his accounts in a manner prejudicial to the petitioners claim for deductions on account of sale of tax free goods during the period ? Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner was entitled to the entire deduction on account of sale of meat and fish in terms of Notification No. 5564 Ft. dated 30-3-49 under section 6 of the Bihar Sales Act. 1947 ? Whether the Member Board of Revenue having held that meat and fish mentioned in Notification No. 5564 Ft. dated 30- 3-49 under section 6 of the Bihar Sales Tax, Act. 1947, included boiled meat and fish and cold meat and fish, could legally hold that meat and fish cooked otherwise were not covered in the terms of said notification\nWhether in terms of the Notification No. 5564 Ft. dated 30-3-49 cold meat and fish and boiled meat and fish could be distinguished from other preparation of meat and fish\nBut the Board of Revenue referred the following question to the High Court under s. 6- Whether the following forms of meat and fish are covered by Notification No. 5564 Ft. dated 30-3-49, issued under section 6 of the Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1947 ? Raw (i.e. uncooked in any way) meat or fish. Boiled meat and fish, cooled or uncooled, meant for sale or consumption outside the petitioners premises. Fish or meat, which has been boiled or cooked in some other way served as separate or part of a dish outside the petitioners premises as separate dishes or part of a menu\nFish or meat, which has been boiled or cooked in some other way, served as separate dishes or part of a dish outside the petitioners premises\nThe High court reframed the question as follows- Whether the petitioner was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 5564 Ft., dated 30th March, 1949, issued under section 6 of the Bihar Sales Act, 1947 with regard to the sales of the preparations of meat and fish e.g., meat curry and fish curry served as separate dishes, or as part of the menu, at lunch or dinner, at the petitioners premises or outside ? and answered it against the appellant. It is against the order of the Board of Revenue that the appellant has come in appeal by special leave but has not appeared against the judgment and order of the High Court\nin cases where a reference is made to the High Court and the appeal is brought only against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal then the Supreme Court, if it interfered, would in fact be setting aside the judgment of the High Court without there being an appeal to this Court, and that this Court could not bypass the normal procedure which was to be adopted for the purpose.\nas the assessee had not obtained Special Leave in respect of any of the orders passed by the High Court under s. 25 those orders became final and binding and the assessee could not be allowed to bypass or go behind the orders of the High Court and such exercise would be particularly inadvisable in a case where the result may be a conflict of the decision of two courts of competent jurisdiction, which was contrary to the object of ss. 23, 24 and 25 of the Act\nIn this view of the law the appellant is not entitled to agitate the correctness or otherwise of the decision given by the Tribunal in regard to the questions which we agitated before the High Court and were decided against the appellant and against which no appeal has been brought.\nIt was open to the appellant to apply to the High Court for a reference under s. 25. That the appellant did not do, and it has not been shown that there was any such breach of the rules of natural justice or violation of any principal of law which would be a good ground for our interference direct with the orders of the Board of Revenue in an appeal under Art. 136 of the Constitution.", + "expert_4": "This appeal by Special Leave against the order of the Board of Revenue, Bihar, relates to the assessment for the year 1950-51 of Sale Tax of the appellant under the Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1947 (Act 19 of 1947), hereinafter called the Act.\nThe appellant was a railway caterer, who had Refreshment Rooms and Tea Stalls at various Railway Stations.\nHe sold various kinds of eatables, cigarettes, betels, milk, fruits and tea at railway stations.\nHe was registered as a dealer under the Act and had been carrying on business for a fairly long time.\nHis case was that as it was difficult for him to maintain accounts in regard to eatables, some of which were taxable and others were not, he made representation in 1944 to the Bihar Government for some arrangement so that the difficulty in keeping different sets of account would be the obviated.\nAs a result of his representation the Bihar Government by a letter June 5, 1915, agreed that the appellants taxable turnover in Bihar would be taken to be 66 2/3 of the, gross turnover during the quarter ending December 31, 1944, and that this percentage might be revised after December 31, 1945.\nAs a result of this letter, the appellant did not keep separate accounts for taxable and non-taxable items and for some of the quarters subsequent to those mentioned in the letter above referred to were also taxed according to the arrangements contained in that letter.\nFor the period April 1, 1950, to March 31, 1951, the gross turnover was Rs. 11,16,270-11-0 and the appellant claimed that he be assessed at 66 2/3 of that amount but the Sales Tax officer taxed him on the total gross turnover except for the usual rebate of 4 allowed in such cases.\nAgainst this order he took the usual appeals to the Sales Tax Authorities and after the appeals were rejected, he took a revision under s. 24 of the Act before the Board of Revenue, Bihar, where also he was unsuccessful.\nUnder s. 25 of the Act, he applied for referring 6 questions of law to the High court and those questions were as follows- \n Whether upon the true construction of the agreement of 1945 between the State Government and the assessee which had been acted upon and not reviewed, the Department was legally entitled to tax petitioner on his gross turnover instead of 66 2/3 of the same \n Whether Member, Board of Revenue, having held that in the circumstances the petitioner had prima facie bona fide grounds for his belief that the arrangement which the Department had entered into, would continue could legally hold, that the petitioner was not entitled to be assessed in terms of the said arrangement ? Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, it is open to the Department to challenge the continuance of the arrangement arrived at between the State Government and the petitioner especially so when the State Government by its own acts or omissions misled the petitioner into maintaining his accounts in a manner prejudicial to the petitioners claim for deductions on account of sale of tax free goods during the period ?\nWhether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner was entitled to the entire deduction on account of sale of meat and fish in terms of Notification No. 5564 Ft. dated 30-3-49 under section 6 of the Bihar Sales Act. 1947 ? Whether the Member Board of Revenue having held that meat and fish mentioned in Notification No. 5564 Ft. dated 30- 3-49 under section 6 of the Bihar Sales Tax, Act. 1947, included boiled meat and fish and cold meat and fish, could legally hold that meat and fish cooked otherwise were not covered in the terms of said notification ?\nWhether in terms of the Notification No. 5564 Ft. dated 30-3-49 cold meat and fish and boiled meat and fish could be distinguished from other preparation of meat and fish ?\nBut the Board of Revenue referred the following question to the High Court under s. 6- Whether the following forms of meat and fish are covered by Notification No. 5564 Ft. dated 30-3-49, issued under section 6 of the Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1947 ?\nThe High court reframed the question as follows- Whether the petitioner was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 5564 Ft., dated 30th March, 1949, issued under section 6 of the Bihar Sales Act, 1947 with regard to the sales of the preparations of meat and fish e.g., meat curry and fish curry served as separate dishes, or as part of the menu, at lunch or dinner, at the petitioners premises or outside ? and answered it against the appellant.\nThis Court in M s. Chimmonalall Rameshwarlall Commissioner of Income-tax (Central) Calcutta (1) held that in cases where a reference is made to the High Court and the appeal is brought only against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal then the Supreme Court, if it interfered, would in fact be setting aside the judgment of the High Court without there being an appeal to this Court, and that this Court could not bypass the normal procedure which was to be adopted for the purpose.\nIn a later Judgment in Chandi Prasad Chokhani v. State of Bihar (2)a similar view was taken that as the assessee had not obtained Special Leave in respect of any of the orders passed by the High Court under s. 25 those orders became final and binding and the assessee could not be allowed to bypass or go behind the orders of the High Court and such exercise would be particularly inadvisable in a case where the result may be a conflict of the decision of two courts of competent jurisdiction, which was contrary to the object of ss. 23, 24 and 25 of the Act.\nIn this view of the law the appellant is not entitled to agitate the correctness or otherwise of the decision given by the Tribunal in regard to the questions which we agitated before the High Court and were decided against the appellant and against which no appeal has been brought.\nBut he submits that there are three other questions which also arise, and on which the appellant wanted a reference to the High Court but which were not referred.\nIt was open to the appellant to apply to the High Court for a reference under s. 25. That the appellant did not do, and it has not been shown that there was any such breach of the rules of natural justice or violation of any principal of law which would be a good ground for our interference direct with the orders of the Board of Revenue in an appeal under Art. 136 of the Constitution.", + "expert_5": "This Court in M s. Chimmonalall Rameshwarlall Commissioner of Income-tax (Central) Calcutta (1) held that in cases where a reference is made to the High Court and the appeal is brought only against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal then the Supreme Court, if it interfered, would in fact be setting aside the judgment of the High Court without there being an appeal to this Court, and that this Court could not bypass the normal procedure which was to be adopted for the purpose.\nin Chandi Prasad Chokhani v. State of Bihar (2)a similar view was taken that as the assessee had not obtained Special Leave in respect of any of the orders passed by the High Court under s. 25 those orders became final and binding and the assessee could not be allowed to bypass or go behind the orders of the High Court and such exercise would be particularly inadvisable in a case where the result may be a conflict of the decision of two courts of competent jurisdiction, which was contrary to the object of ss. 23, 24 and 25 of the Act.\nIn this view of the law the appellant is not entitled to agitate the correctness or otherwise of the decision given by the Tribunal in regard to the questions which we agitated before the High Court and were decided against the appellant and against which no appeal has been brought\nIt was open to the appellant to apply to the High Court for a reference under s. 25. That the appellant did not do, and it has not been shown that there was any such breach of the rules of natural justice or violation of any principal of law which would be a good ground for our interference direct with the orders of the Board of Revenue in an appeal under Art. 136 of the Constitution." + }, + "1962_118": { + "expert_1": "On the 26th July, 1958, the Collector of Central Excise, Nagpur, passed an order directing absolute confiscation of five bars of gold weighing 290.6 Tolas found in the possession of the appellant Pukhraj and imposing upon him a personal penalty of Rs. 25,000/- under s. 167 (8) of the Sea Customs Act, 1878 read with a. 19 of the said Act and s. 23-A of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947. Aggrieved by the said order, the appellant filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur under Arts. 226 and 227 of the Constitution on September 15, 1958. By this petition, the appellant claimed a writ of Certiorari or other appropriate writ or order quashing the impugned order. It was urged by him in support of his petit-ion, inter alia, that s. 178A of the Sea Customs Act was unconstitutional in that it infringed the appellants fundamental right under Art. 19 (1) (1) and (g) of the Constitution. It was also. urged that on the merits, the said impugned order was not justified by the relevant statutory provisions of the Sea Customs Act read with the Foreign Exchange, Regulation Act. The High Court rejected the appellants challenge to the validity of s. 178A and held that the order directing the confiscation of five bars of gold was valid. The High Court, however, took the view that the direction issued by the Collector of Central Excise imposing a personal penalty of Rs. 25,000/- On the appellant was invalid and so, the said direction was sot aside and a writ issued in that behalf. The appellant then applied for and obtained a certificate from the said High Court and it is with the said certificate that he has come to this Court for challenging the correctness of the order passed by the High Court by which the confiscation of gold in question has been held to be valid.\nThe main point on which the certificate was granted by the High Court to the appellant was in regard to the constitutional validity of a. 178A.\nThat question has, in the meanwhile, been decided by this Court on September 25, 1961, in Civil Appeals Nos. 408 to 410 of 1960 and other companion appeals. The judgment of the constitutional Bench dealingwith those appeals has upheld the validity of s.178A and so, the principal point which the appellant wanted to raise before this Court is now concluded against him. For the appellant, Mr. Bobde has, however, urged three other contentions before us in support of his case that the confiscation of gold is not justified. \nBefore dealing with these contentions, it is necessary to mention very briefly the relevant facts which led to the confiscation of gold. The appellant is a goldsmith by profession and owns a gold and silver shop at Rajnandgaon in Madhya Pradesh. On October 25, 1956, whilst he was travelling by the passenger train from Calcutta on the CalcuttaNagpur route, he was searched at Raigarh railway station and found to be in possession of five pieces of gold bullion weighing 290.6 tolas valued at Rs. 29,835/- approximately. The said gold was then seized by the Officer concerned acting on a reasonable belief that it was smuggled gold, and notice was issued against the appellant on May 20, 1957, calling upon him to show cause why action should not be taken against him for having contravened the notification issued by the Government of India No. 12 (11)-F.1/48 dated August 26, 1948 under the foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 read with s.23A of the said Act and s.19 of the Sea Customs Act and punishable under item (8) of s.167 of the Sea Customs Act. The appellant sent a reply and thereupon, the Collector of Central Excise held an enquiry. At the enquiry the appellant appeared by counsel and examined four witnesses in support of his plea that he was in possession of gold Which belonged to him and which was not smuggled gold at all. Documentary evidence in the form of account books was also produced by the appellant in sup. port of his plea. The Collector of Central Excise disbelieved the evidence adduced by the appellant and came to the conclusion that the presumption arising under s.178 of the Sea Customs Act had not .been rebutted by the appellant and so, he proceeded to pass the impugned order confiscating gold and imposing on the appellant a personal penalty of Rs.25,000/-\nIt is in the light of these facts that the three contentions raised by Mr. Bobde fall to be, considered in the present appeal. The first argument raised in support of the appeal is that the confiscation of gold is not justified under s.167(8) because it has been found by the High Court that the appellant is not a person concerned in the offence of importation of the said gold. It appears that in dealing with the question as to whether the personal penalty imposed upon the appellant is valid or not, the High Court has relied on two considerations. It has held that the jurisdiction of the officer to impose a personal penalty was confined to the imposition of a penalty only up to Rs.1000/-and no more, and in support of this conclusion, the High Court relied on certain observations made by this Court in F.N.Roy v. Collector of Customs, Calcutta(1). This question has been recently considered by this Court in M s. Ranchhoddas Atmaram v. The Union of India(2) and it has been held that the language in item (8) of s.167 is clear and it permits the imposition of a penalty in excess of Rs.1000/- and that must be given effect to whatever may have been the intention in other provisions. So, it is clear that the High Court was in error in taking the view that under section 167(8), it was not within the jurisdiction of the Collector of Central Excise to impose a penalty exceeding Rs. 1000/-. The High Court has also held that the appellant was not shown to have been concerned with the importation of the smuggled gold, though he was found in possession of it and this finding, according to the High Court, justified the conclusion that a personal penalty could not be imposed on him.\nWe are not called upon to consider in the present appeal the correctness or propriety of this conclusion because there is no appeal by the respondent Collector of Central Excise challenging this part of the High Courts order.\nBasing himself on the finding of the High Court that the appellant was not concerned in the importation of ,smuggled gold, Mr. Bobde argues that even the goods cannot be confiscated under s.167(8). In our opinion, this argument is clearly misconceived.\nTherefore, once s.167(8) is hold to be applicable, the validity of the order directing the confiscation of the smuggled goods is beyond any challenge.\nIt would, thus be noticed that the combined effect of the aforesaid provisions of the two Acts and the relevant notification is that the notification of 1948 has the force of a notification issued under s. 19 of the Sea Customs Act, and in consequence, gold imported in contravention of the said notification is liable to be seized under . 1.78 of the said Act and renders the person in possession of the said gold liable for proceedings under s.167(8) of the said Act and since the matter falls to be considered under the, relevant provisions of the Sea Customs Act, s. 178A is also applicable. This position is not disputed. Now s. 178A places the burden of proving that the goods are not smuggled goods on the person from whose possession the said goods are seized where it appears that the said goods are seized under the provisions of the Sea Customs Act in the reasonable belief that they are smuggled goods.\nOnce it is shown that the goods were seized in the manner contemplated by the first part of s. 178A, it would be for the appellant to prove that the goods were not smuggled goods and since it has been held by the Collector of Central Excise that the appellant had not discharged the onus imposed on him by s. 178A, the statutory presumption remained unrebutted and so, the goods must be dealt with on the basis that they are smuggled goods. As soon as we reach this conclusion, it follows that under s. 167(8) of the Sea Customs Act, the said goods are liable to confiscation. That is the view taken by the High Court when it rejected the appellants prayer for a writ quashing the order of confiscation passed by the Collector of Central Excise in respect of the gold in question, and we see no reason to interfere with it.\nThe next argument urged by Mr. Bobde is that certain witnesses whose evidence was recorded by the Collector of Central Excise in the enquiry before him, were not produced for cross-examination by the appellant. In our opinion, there is no substance in this argument.\nThis complaint relates to the evidence of Anwar, Marotrao and his brother Rambhau. These three persons, it is alleged made their statements in the absence of the appellant. It was, however, stated before the High Court by Mr. Abhyankar for the department that Anwar was, in fact, examined in the presence of the appellants counsel and the appellants counsel did not cross-examine him. This statement was accepted by Mr. Sorabji who appeared for the appellant and so, no valid complaint can be made that Anwar gave evidence in the absence of the appellant and the appellant bad no opportunity to cross-examine him. Then, as regards Marotrao and Rambhau, their statements were intended to show that the appellants case that he had got the gold melted through them was not true. At the enquiry, the appellant gave up this stand and did not adhere to his earlier version that the gold in question had been melted with the assistance of the said two witnesses.\nSince it became unnecessary to consider that plea because of the change of attitude adopted by the appellant, it was hardly necessary to allow the appellant to cross-examine the said two witnesses. Their version on the point was no longer inconsistent with the subsequent case set up by the appellant. \nTherefore there is no substance in the argument that the enquiry held by the Collector of Central Excise was conducted unfairly and the procedure adopted at the said enquiry was inconsistent with the requirements of natural justice.\nThe last contention raised by Mr. Bobde was that there is nothing on record to show that the seizure of gold from the appellant had been affected by the officer concerned acting on a reasonable belief that the said gold was smuggled. It would be recalled that S. 178A of the Sea Customs Act requires that before the burden can be imposed on the appellant to show that the goods in question were not smuggled, it has to be shown that the goods had been seized under the said Act and in the reasonable belief that they are smuggled goods.\nThe argument is that the question as to whether there was a reasonable belief or not is justiceable, and since there is no material on the record to show that the belief could have been reasonable, the statutory presumption cannot be raised. In our opinion, this argument is not well-founded.\nThere are two broad features of this seizure which cannot be igno- red. The first feature on which the officer relied is supplied by the quantity of gold in question. It was found that the appellant was carrying on his person five pieces of gold bullion weighing as much as 290.6 tolas. \nThis large quantity of gold valued at nearly Rs. 30,000/- itself justified a reasonable belief in the mind of the officer that the gold may be smuggled. In that connection, it may not be irrelevant to remember that the said officer had received positive information in the month of September, 1956, regarding the smuggling of gold by the appellant. That is why he was intercepted by the officer on the 25th October, 1956, at the Raigarb railway station at 16.30 hours. Then the other fact on which the reasonable belief can be founded is the suspicious circumstances of the appellants journey. The appellant was found travelling without a Railway ticket and his explanation as to how he came to be. in the said passenger train is obviously untrue. A person carrying a, large quantity of gold and found travelling without a ticket may well have raised a reasonable belief in the mind of the officer that the gold was smuggled. The object of travelling without a ticket must have been to conceal the fact that the appellant had travelled all the way from Calcutta at which place the gold must have been smuggled. The story subsequently mentioned by the appellant about his journey to Tatanagar which has been disbelieved brings into bold belief the purpose which the appellant had in mind in travelling without a ticket.\nAfter-all-, when we are dealing with a question as to whether the belief in the mind of the Officer who effected the seizure was reasonable or not, we are not sitting in appeal over the decision of the said officer. All that we can consider is whether there is ground which prima facie justifies the said reasonable belief. That being so, we do not think there is any substance in the argument that the seizure was effected without a reasonable belief and so is outside section 178A.", + "expert_2": "three other contentions before us in support of his case that the confiscation of gold is not justified.\ngold was then seized by the Officer concerned acting on a reasonable belief that it was smuggled gold, and notice was issued against the appellant on May 20, 1957, calling upon him to show cause why action should not be taken against him for having contravened the notification issued by the Government of India No. 12 (11)-F.1/48 dated August 26, 1948 under the foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 read with s.23A of the said Act and s.19 of the Sea Customs Act and punishable under item (8) of s.167 of the Sea Customs Act.\nThe Collector of Central Excise disbelieved the evidence adduced by the appellant and came to the conclusion that the presumption arising under s.178 of the Sea Customs Act had not .been rebutted by the appellant and so, he proceeded to pass the impugned order confiscating gold and imposing on the appellant a personal penalty of Rs.25,000/-.\nThe first argument raised in support of the appeal is that the confiscation of gold is not justified under s.167(8) because it has been found by the High Court that the appellant is not a person concerned in the offence of importation of the said gold.\nthe jurisdiction of the officer to impose a personal penalty was confined to the imposition of a penalty only up to Rs.1000/-and no more\nThis question has been recently considered by this Court in M s. Ranchhoddas Atmaram v. The Union of India(2) and it has been held that the language in item (8) of s.167 is clear and it permits the imposition of a penalty in excess of Rs.1000/- and that must be given effect to whatever may have been the intention in other provisions.\nSection 167(8) clearly provides, inter alia, that if (1) 1957 S.C.R.1 151 at p.1158, (2) 1961 3 S.C.R. 718. any goods, the importation of which is for the time being prohibited or restricted by or under Chapter IV of the Act, be imported into India contrary to such prohibition or restriction, such goods shall be liable to confiscation. If s.167(8) applies, then there can be no doubt that as soon as it is shown that certain goods have been imported contrary to the statutory prohibition or restriction, they are liable to confiscation and the confiscation of the said goods is not based on the fact that they are necessarily found with a person who was concerned with their importation. Therefore, once s.167(8) is hold to be applicable, the validity of the order directing the confiscation of the smuggled goods is beyond any challenge.\nThis notification imposed restrictions on import of gold and silver and it has been issued under s.8(1) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947. The effect of this notification, inter alia, is that except with the general or special permission of the Reserve Bank, no person shall bring or send into India from any place outside India any gold, coin gold bullion. gold sheets or gold ingot, whether refined or not. Thus, bringing into India gold from outside is prohibited by this notification unless the said gold is brought with the general or special permission of the Reserve Bank. Section 23 of the said Act provides for penalty and procedure in respect of contravention of its provisions and of rules, orders or directions issued thereunder.\nIt would, thus be noticed that the combined effect of the aforesaid provisions of the two Acts and the relevant notification is that the notification of 1948 has the force of a notification issued under s. 19 of the Sea Customs Act, and in consequence, gold imported in contravention of the said notification is liable to be seized under . 1.78 of the said Act and renders the person in possession of the said gold liable for proceedings under s.167(8) of the said Act and since the matter falls to be considered under the, relevant provisions of the Sea Customs Act, s. 178A is also applicable.\nNow s. 178A places the burden of proving that the goods are not smuggled goods on the person from whose possession the said goods are seized where it appears that the said goods are seized under the provisions of the Sea Customs Act in the reasonable belief that they are smuggled goods.\nOnce it is shown that the goods were seized in the manner contemplated by the first part of s. 178A, it would be for the appellant to prove that the goods were not smuggled goods and since it has been held by the Collector of Central Excise that the appellant had not discharged the onus imposed on him by s. 178A, the statutory presumption remained unrebutted and so, the goods must be dealt with on the basis that they are smuggled goods. As soon as we reach this conclusion, it follows that under s. 167(8) of the Sea Customs Act, the said goods are liable to confiscation.\nBobde is that certain witnesses whose evidence was recorded by the Collector of Central Excise in the enquiry before him, were not produced for cross-examination by the appellant. In our opinion, there is no substance in this argument.\nTherefore there is no substance in the argument that the enquiry held by the Collector of Central Excise was conducted unfairly and the procedure adopted at the said enquiry was inconsistent with the requirements of natural justice.\nThe argument is that the question as to whether there was a reasonable belief or not is justiceable, and since there is no material on the record to show that the belief could have been reasonable, the statutory presumption cannot be raised.\nThere are two broad features of this seizure which cannot be igno- red. The first feature on which the officer relied is supplied by the quantity of gold in question. It was found that the appellant was carrying on his person five pieces of gold bullion weighing as much as 290.6 tolas. \nThis large quantity of gold valued at nearly Rs. 30,000/- itself justified a reasonable belief in the mind of the officer that the gold may be smuggled. In that connection, it may not be irrelevant to remember that the said officer had received positive information in the month of September, 1956, regarding the smuggling of gold by the appellant. That is why he was intercepted by the officer on the 25th October, 1956, at the Raigarb railway station at 16.30 hours.\nThe appellant was found travelling without a Railway ticket and his explanation as to how he came to be. in the said passenger train is obviously untrue. A person carrying a, large quantity of gold and found travelling without a ticket may well have raised a reasonable belief in the mind of the officer that the gold was smuggled. The object of travelling without a ticket must have been to conceal the fact that the appellant had travelled all the way from Calcutta at which place the gold must have been smuggled.\nAll that we can consider is whether there is ground which prima facie justifies the said reasonable belief.", + "expert_3": "On the 26th July, 1958, the Collector of Central Excise, Nagpur, passed an order directing absolute confiscation of five bars of gold weighing 290.6 Tolas found in the possession of the appellant Pukhraj and imposing upon him a personal penalty of Rs. 25,000/- under s. 167 (8) of the Sea Customs Act, 1878 read with a. 19 of the said Act and s. 23-A of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947\nAggrieved by the said order, the appellant filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur under Arts. 226 and 227 of the Constitution on September 15, 1958. By this petition, the appellant claimed a writ of Certiorari or other appropriate writ or order quashing the impugned order. It was urged by him in support of his petit-ion, inter alia, that s. 178A of the Sea Customs Act was unconstitutional in that it infringed the appellants fundamental right under Art. 19 (1) (1) and (g) of the Constitution. It was also. urged that on the merits, the said impugned order was not justified by the relevant statutory provisions of the Sea Customs Act read with the Foreign Exchange, Regulation Act\nThe High Court rejected the appellants challenge to the validity of s. 178A and held that the order directing the confiscation of five bars of gold was valid\nThe appellant then applied for and obtained a certificate from the said High Court and it is with the said certificate that he has come to this Court for challenging the correctness of the order passed by the High Court by which the confiscation of gold in question has been held to be valid.\nThe main point on which the certificate was granted by the High Court to the appellant was in regard to the constitutional validity of a. 178A. That question has, in the meanwhile, been decided by this Court on September 25, 1961, in Civil Appeals Nos. 408 to 410 of 1960 and other companion appeals. The judgment of the constitutional Bench dealingwith those appeals has upheld the validity of s.178A and so, the principal point which the appellant wanted to raise before this Court is now concluded against him.\nThe appellant is a goldsmith by profession and owns a gold and silver shop at Rajnandgaon in Madhya Pradesh. On October 25, 1956, whilst he was travelling by the passenger train from Calcutta on the CalcuttaNagpur route, he was searched at Raigarh railway station and found to be in possession of five pieces of gold bullion weighing 290.6 tolas valued at Rs. 29,835/- approximately. The said gold was then seized by the Officer concerned acting on a reasonable belief that it was smuggled gold, and notice was issued against the appellant on May 20, 1957, calling upon him to show cause why action should not be taken against him for having contravened the notification issued by the Government of India No. 12 (11)-F.1/48 dated August 26, 1948 under the foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 read with s.23A of the said Act and s.19 of the Sea Customs Act and punishable under item (8) of s.167 of the Sea Customs Act. The appellant sent a reply and thereupon, the Collector of Central Excise held an enquiry\nAt the enquiry the appellant appeared by counsel and examined four witnesses in support of his plea that he was in possession of gold Which belonged to him and which was not smuggled gold at all. Documentary evidence in the form of account books was also produced by the appellant in sup. port of his plea. The Collector of Central Excise disbelieved the evidence adduced by the appellant and came to the conclusion that the presumption arising under s.178 of the Sea Customs Act had not .been rebutted by the appellant and so, he proceeded to pass the impugned order confiscating gold and imposing on the appellant a personal penalty of Rs.25,000/-\nIt appears that in dealing with the question as to whether the personal penalty imposed upon the appellant is valid or not, the High Court has relied on two considerations. It has held that the jurisdiction of the officer to impose a personal penalty was confined to the imposition of a penalty only up to Rs.1000/-and no more\nThis question has been recently considered by this Court in M s. Ranchhoddas Atmaram v. The Union of India(2) and it has been held that the language in item (8) of s.167 is clear and it permits the imposition of a penalty in excess of Rs.1000/- and that must be given effect to whatever may have been the intention in other provisions. So, it is clear that the High Court was in error in taking the view that under section 167(8), it was not within the jurisdiction of the Collector of Central Excise to impose a penalty exceeding Rs. 1000\nSection 167(8) clearly provides, inter alia, that if (1) 1957 S.C.R.1 151 at p.1158, (2) 1961 3 S.C.R. 718. any goods, the importation of which is for the time being prohibited or restricted by or under Chapter IV of the Act, be imported into India contrary to such prohibition or restriction, such goods shall be liable to confiscation\nIf s.167(8) applies, then there can be no doubt that as soon as it is shown that certain goods have been imported contrary to the statutory prohibition or restriction, they are liable to confiscation and the confiscation of the said goods is not based on the fact that they are necessarily found with a person who was concerned with their importation. Therefore, once s.167(8) is hold to be applicable, the validity of the order directing the confiscation of the smuggled goods is beyond any challenge\nThe next question to consider is whether s.167(8) applies to the facts of this case, and that takes us to the relevant notification issued by the Government of India in 1948\nThis notification imposed restrictions on import of gold and silver and it has been issued under s.8(1) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947. The effect of this notification, inter alia, is that except with the general or special permission of the Reserve Bank, no person shall bring or send into India from any place outside India any gold, coin gold bullion. gold sheets or gold ingot, whether refined or not. Thus, bringing into India gold from outside is prohibited by this notification unless the said gold is brought with the general or special permission of the Reserve Bank. Section 23 of the said Act provides for penalty and procedure in respect of contravention of its provisions and of rules, orders or directions issued thereunder.\nSection 23-A provides that without prejudice to the provisions of s. 23 or to any other provision contained in the said Act, the restrictions imposed by sub-s.(1) and (2) of s. 8 shall be deemed to have been imposed under s. 19 of the Sea Customs Act, and all the provisions or that Act shall have effect accordingly, except that s. 183 thereof shall have effect as if for the word shall therein the word ,may was substituted\nIt would, thus be noticed that the combined effect of the aforesaid provisions of the two Acts and the relevant notification is that the notification of 1948 has the force of a notification issued under s. 19 of the Sea Customs Act, and in consequence, gold imported in contravention of the said notification is liable to be seized under . 1.78 of the said Act and renders the person in possession of the said gold liable for proceedings under s.167(8) of the said Act and since the matter falls to be considered under the, relevant provisions of the Sea Customs Act, s. 178A is also applicable. This position is not disputed\nNow s. 178A places the burden of proving that the goods are not smuggled goods on the person from whose possession the said goods are seized where it appears that the said goods are seized under the provisions of the Sea Customs Act in the reasonable belief that they are smuggled goods. Once it is shown that the goods were seized in the manner contemplated by the first part of s. 178A, it would be for the appellant to prove that the goods were not smuggled goods and since it has been held by the Collector of Central Excise that the appellant had not discharged the onus imposed on him by s. 178A, the statutory presumption remained unrebutted and so, the goods must be dealt with on the basis that they are smuggled goods. As soon as we reach this conclusion, it follows that under s. 167(8) of the Sea Customs Act, the said goods are liable to confiscation\nThat is the view taken by the High Court when it rejected the appellants prayer for a writ quashing the order of confiscation passed by the Collector of Central Excise in respect of the gold in question, and we see no reason to interfere with it\nThis complaint relates to the evidence of Anwar, Marotrao and his brother Rambhau. These three persons, it is alleged made their statements in the absence of the appellant. It was, however, stated before the High Court by Mr. Abhyankar for the department that Anwar was, in fact, examined in the presence of the appellants counsel and the appellants counsel did not cross-examine him. This statement was accepted by Mr. Sorabji who appeared for the appellant and so, no valid complaint can be made that Anwar gave evidence in the absence of the appellant and the appellant bad no opportunity to cross-examine him\nThen, as regards Marotrao and Rambhau, their statements were intended to show that the appellants case that he had got the gold melted through them was not true. At the enquiry, the appellant gave up this stand and did not adhere to his earlier version that the gold in question had been melted with the assistance of the said two witnesses. Since it became unnecessary to consider that plea because of the change of attitude adopted by the appellant, it was hardly necessary to allow the appellant to cross-examine the said two witnesses. Their version on the point was no longer inconsistent with the subsequent case set up by the appellant\nTherefore there is no substance in the argument that the enquiry held by the Collector of Central Excise was conducted unfairly and the procedure adopted at the said enquiry was inconsistent with the requirements of natural justice\nIt would be recalled that S. 178A of the Sea Customs Act requires that before the burden can be imposed on the appellant to show that the goods in question were not smuggled, it has to be shown that the goods had been seized under the said Act and in the reasonable belief that they are smuggled goods\nThe argument is that the question as to whether there was a reasonable belief or not is justiceable, and since there is no material on the record to show that the belief could have been reasonable, the statutory presumption cannot be raised. In our opinion, this argument is not well-founded\nThere are two broad features of this seizure which cannot be igno- red. The first feature on which the officer relied is supplied by the quantity of gold in question. It was found that the appellant was carrying on his person five pieces of gold bullion weighing as much as 290.6 tolas\nThis large quantity of gold valued at nearly Rs. 30,000/- itself justified a reasonable belief in the mind of the officer that the gold may be smuggled. In that connection, it may not be irrelevant to remember that the said officer had received positive information in the month of September, 1956, regarding the smuggling of gold by the appellant\nThat is why he was intercepted by the officer on the 25th October, 1956, at the Raigarb railway station at 16.30 hours. Then the other fact on which the reasonable belief can be founded is the suspicious circumstances of the appellants journey. The appellant was found travelling without a Railway ticket and his explanation as to how he came to be. in the said passenger train is obviously untrue\nA person carrying a, large quantity of gold and found travelling without a ticket may well have raised a reasonable belief in the mind of the officer that the gold was smuggled. The object of travelling without a ticket must have been to conceal the fact that the appellant had travelled all the way from Calcutta at which place the gold must have been smuggled\nThe story subsequently mentioned by the appellant about his journey to Tatanagar which has been disbelieved brings into bold belief the purpose which the appellant had in mind in travelling without a ticket.\nAfter-all-, when we are dealing with a question as to whether the belief in the mind of the Officer who effected the seizure was reasonable or not, we are not sitting in appeal over the decision of the said officer. All that we can consider is whether there is ground which prima facie justifies the said reasonable belief. That being so, we do not think there is any substance in the argument that the seizure was effected without a reasonable belief and so is outside section 178A", + "expert_4": "On the 26th July, 1958, the Collector of Central Excise, Nagpur, passed an order directing absolute confiscation of five bars of gold weighing 290.6 Tolas found in the possession of the appellant Pukhraj and imposing upon him a personal penalty of Rs. 25,000/- under s. 167 (8) of the Sea Customs Act, 1878 read with a. 19 of the said Act and s. 23-A of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947.\nAggrieved by the said order, the appellant filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur under Arts. 226 and 227 of the Constitution on September 15, 1958.\nBy this petition, the appellant claimed a writ of Certiorari or other appropriate writ or order quashing the impugned order. It was urged by him in support of his petit-ion, inter alia, that s. 178A of the Sea Customs Act was unconstitutional in that it infringed the appellants fundamental right under Art. 19 (1) (1) and (g) of the Constitution. It was also. urged that on the merits, the said impugned order was not justified by the relevant statutory provisions of the Sea Customs Act read with the Foreign Exchange, Regulation Act.\nThe High Court rejected the appellants challenge to the validity of s. 178A and held that the order directing the confiscation of five bars of gold was valid.\nThe High Court, however, took the view that the direction issued by the Collector of Central Excise imposing a personal penalty of Rs. 25,000/- On the appellant was invalid and so, the said direction was sot aside and a writ issued in that behalf.\nThe main point on which the certificate was granted by the High Court to the appellant was in regard to the constitutional validity of a. 178A.\nThat question has, in the meanwhile, been decided by this Court on September 25, 1961, in Civil Appeals Nos. 408 to 410 of 1960 and other companion appeals. The judgment of the constitutional Bench dealingwith those appeals has upheld the validity of s.178A and so, the principal point which the appellant wanted to raise before this Court is now concluded against him.\nFor the appellant, Mr. Bobde has, however, urged three other contentions before us in support of his case that the confiscation of gold is not justified.\nThe appellant is a goldsmith by profession and owns a gold and silver shop at Rajnandgaon in Madhya Pradesh. On October 25, 1956, whilst he was travelling by the passenger train from Calcutta on the CalcuttaNagpur route, he was searched at Raigarh railway station and found to be in possession of five pieces of gold bullion weighing 290.6 tolas valued at Rs. 29,835/- approximately.\nThe said gold was then seized by the Officer concerned acting on a reasonable belief that it was smuggled gold, and notice was issued against the appellant on May 20, 1957, calling upon him to show cause why action should not be taken against him for having contravened the notification issued by the Government of India No. 12 (11)-F.1/48 dated August 26, 1948 under the foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 read with s.23A of the said Act and s.19 of the Sea Customs Act and punishable under item (8) of s.167 of the Sea Customs Act.\nThe Collector of Central Excise disbelieved the evidence adduced by the appellant and came to the conclusion that the presumption arising under s.178 of the Sea Customs Act had not .been rebutted by the appellant and so, he proceeded to pass the impugned order confiscating gold and imposing on the appellant a personal penalty of Rs.25,000/-.\nIt is in the light of these facts that the three contentions raised by Mr. Bobde fall to be, considered in the present appeal. The first argument raised in support of the appeal is that the confiscation of gold is not justified under s.167(8) because it has been found by the High Court that the appellant is not a person concerned in the offence of importation of the said gold.\nThis question has been recently considered by this Court in M s. Ranchhoddas Atmaram v. The Union of India(2) and it has been held that the language in item (8) of s.167 is clear and it permits the imposition of a penalty in excess of Rs.1000/- and that must be given effect to whatever may have been the intention in other provisions.\nSo, it is clear that the High Court was in error in taking the view that under section 167(8), it was not within the jurisdiction of the Collector of Central Excise to impose a penalty exceeding Rs. 1000/-.\nBasing himself on the finding of the High Court that the appellant was not concerned in the importation of ,smuggled gold, Mr. Bobde argues that even the goods cannot be confiscated under s.167(8).\nIn our opinion, this argument is clearly misconceived. Section 167(8) clearly provides, inter alia, that if (1) 1957 S.C.R.1 151 at p.1158, (2) 1961 3 S.C.R. 718. any goods, the importation of which is for the time being prohibited or restricted by or under Chapter IV of the Act, be imported into India contrary to such prohibition or restriction, such goods shall be liable to confiscation.\nIf s.167(8) applies, then there can be no doubt that as soon as it is shown that certain goods have been imported contrary to the statutory prohibition or restriction, they are liable to confiscation and the confiscation of the said goods is not based on the fact that they are necessarily found with a person who was concerned with their importation.\nTherefore, once s.167(8) is hold to be applicable, the validity of the order directing the confiscation of the smuggled goods is beyond any challenge.\nThe next question to consider is whether s.167(8) applies to the facts of this case, and that takes us to the relevant notification issued by the Government of India in 1948.\nThis notification imposed restrictions on import of gold and silver and it has been issued under s.8(1) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947.\nThe effect of this notification, inter alia, is that except with the general or special permission of the Reserve Bank, no person shall bring or send into India from any place outside India any gold, coin gold bullion. gold sheets or gold ingot, whether refined or not.\nThus, bringing into India gold from outside is prohibited by this notification unless the said gold is brought with the general or special permission of the Reserve Bank.\nSection 23 of the said Act provides for penalty and procedure in respect of contravention of its provisions and of rules, orders or directions issued thereunder. Section 23-A provides that without prejudice to the provisions of s. 23 or to any other provision contained in the said Act, the restrictions imposed by sub-s.(1) and (2) of s. 8 shall be deemed to have been imposed under s. 19 of the Sea Customs Act, and all the provisions or that Act shall have effect accordingly, except that s. 183 thereof shall have effect as if for the word shall therein the word ,may was substituted.\nIt would, thus be noticed that the combined effect of the aforesaid provisions of the two Acts and the relevant notification is that the notification of 1948 has the force of a notification issued under s. 19 of the Sea Customs Act, and in consequence, gold imported in contravention of the said notification is liable to be seized under . 1.78 of the said Act and renders the person in possession of the said gold liable for proceedings under s.167(8) of the said Act and since the matter falls to be considered under the, relevant provisions of the Sea Customs Act, s. 178A is also applicable.\nThis position is not disputed.\nNow s. 178A places the burden of proving that the goods are not smuggled goods on the person from whose possession the said goods are seized where it appears that the said goods are seized under the provisions of the Sea Customs Act in the reasonable belief that they are smuggled goods. Once it is shown that the goods were seized in the manner contemplated by the first part of s. 178A, it would be for the appellant to prove that the goods were not smuggled goods and since it has been held by the Collector of Central Excise that the appellant had not discharged the onus imposed on him by s. 178A, the statutory presumption remained unrebutted and so, the goods must be dealt with on the basis that they are smuggled goods.\nAs soon as we reach this conclusion, it follows that under s. 167(8) of the Sea Customs Act, the said goods are liable to confiscation. That is the view taken by the High Court when it rejected the appellants prayer for a writ quashing the order of confiscation passed by the Collector of Central Excise in respect of the gold in question, and we see no reason to interfere with it.\nThe next argument urged by Mr. Bobde is that certain witnesses whose evidence was recorded by the Collector of Central Excise in the enquiry before him, were not produced for cross-examination by the appellant. In our opinion, there is no substance in this argument.\nThis complaint relates to the evidence of Anwar, Marotrao and his brother Rambhau. These three persons, it is alleged made their statements in the absence of the appellant. It was, however, stated before the High Court by Mr. Abhyankar for the department that Anwar was, in fact, examined in the presence of the appellants counsel and the appellants counsel did not cross-examine him. This statement was accepted by Mr. Sorabji who appeared for the appellant and so, no valid complaint can be made that Anwar gave evidence in the absence of the appellant and the appellant bad no opportunity to cross-examine him. Then, as regards Marotrao and Rambhau, their statements were intended to show that the appellants case that he had got the gold melted through them was not true.\nAt the enquiry, the appellant gave up this stand and did not adhere to his earlier version that the gold in question had been melted with the assistance of the said two witnesses.\nSince it became unnecessary to consider that plea because of the change of attitude adopted by the appellant, it was hardly necessary to allow the appellant to cross-examine the said two witnesses.\nTherefore there is no substance in the argument that the enquiry held by the Collector of Central Excise was conducted unfairly and the procedure adopted at the said enquiry was inconsistent with the requirements of natural justice.\nThe last contention raised by Mr. Bobde was that there is nothing on record to show that the seizure of gold from the appellant had been affected by the officer concerned acting on a reasonable belief that the said gold was smuggled.\nIt would be recalled that S. 178A of the Sea Customs Act requires that before the burden can be imposed on the appellant to show that the goods in question were not smuggled, it has to be shown that the goods had been seized under the said Act and in the reasonable belief that they are smuggled goods.\nThe argument is that the question as to whether there was a reasonable belief or not is justiceable, and since there is no material on the record to show that the belief could have been reasonable, the statutory presumption cannot be raised. In our opinion, this argument is not well-founded.\nThere are two broad features of this seizure which cannot be igno- red. The first feature on which the officer relied is supplied by the quantity of gold in question.\nIt was found that the appellant was carrying on his person five pieces of gold bullion weighing as much as 290.6 tolas. \nThis large quantity of gold valued at nearly Rs. 30,000/- itself justified a reasonable belief in the mind of the officer that the gold may be smuggled.\nIn that connection, it may not be irrelevant to remember that the said officer had received positive information in the month of September, 1956, regarding the smuggling of gold by the appellant. That is why he was intercepted by the officer on the 25th October, 1956, at the Raigarb railway station at 16.30 hours.\nThen the other fact on which the reasonable belief can be founded is the suspicious circumstances of the appellants journey. The appellant was found travelling without a Railway ticket and his explanation as to how he came to be. in the said passenger train is obviously untrue.\nA person carrying a, large quantity of gold and found travelling without a ticket may well have raised a reasonable belief in the mind of the officer that the gold was smuggled.\nThe story subsequently mentioned by the appellant about his journey to Tatanagar which has been disbelieved brings into bold belief the purpose which the appellant had in mind in travelling without a ticket.\nAfter-all-, when we are dealing with a question as to whether the belief in the mind of the Officer who effected the seizure was reasonable or not, we are not sitting in appeal over the decision of the said officer.\nAll that we can consider is whether there is ground which prima facie justifies the said reasonable belief. That being so, we do not think there is any substance in the argument that the seizure was effected without a reasonable belief and so is outside section 178A.", + "expert_5": "five bars of gold weighing 290.6 Tolas\nfive pieces of gold bullion weighing 290.6 tolas valued at Rs. 29,835/- approximately.\nWe are not called upon to consider in the present appeal the correctness or propriety of this conclusion because there is no appeal by the respondent Collector of Central Excise challenging this part of the High Courts order.\nSection 167(8) clearly provides, inter alia, that if (1) 1957 S.C.R.1 151 at p.1158, (2) 1961 3 S.C.R. 718. any goods, the importation of which is for the time being prohibited or restricted by or under Chapter IV of the Act, be imported into India contrary to such prohibition or restriction, such goods shall be liable to confiscation.\nIf s.167(8) applies, then there can be no doubt that as soon as it is shown that certain goods have been imported contrary to the statutory prohibition or restriction, they are liable to confiscation and the confiscation of the said goods is not based on the fact that they are necessarily found with a person who was concerned with their importation. Therefore, once s.167(8) is hold to be applicable, the validity of the order directing the confiscation of the smuggled goods is beyond any challenge.\nexcept with the general or special permission of the Reserve Bank, no person shall bring or send into India from any place outside India any gold, coin gold bullion. gold sheets or gold ingot, whether refined or not.\nSection 23-A provides that without prejudice to the provisions of s. 23 or to any other provision contained in the said Act, the restrictions imposed by sub-s.(1) and (2) of s. 8 shall be deemed to have been imposed under s. 19 of the Sea Customs Act, and all the provisions or that Act shall have effect accordingly, except that s. 183 thereof shall have effect as if for the word shall therein the word ,may was substituted.\nthe notification of 1948 has the force of a notification issued under s. 19 of the Sea Customs Act, and in consequence, gold imported in contravention of the said notification is liable to be seized under . 1.78 of the said Act and renders the person in possession of the said gold liable for proceedings under s.167(8) of the said Act and since the matter falls to be considered under the, relevant provisions of the Sea Customs Act, s. 178A is also applicable.\nThis position is not disputed.\nNow s. 178A places the burden of proving that the goods are not smuggled goods on the person from whose possession the said goods are seized where it appears that the said goods are seized under the provisions of the Sea Customs Act in the reasonable belief that they are smuggled goods.\nit would be for the appellant to prove that the goods were not smuggled goods and since it has been held by the Collector of Central Excise that the appellant had not discharged the onus imposed on him by s. 178A, the statutory presumption remained unrebutted and so, the goods must be dealt with on the basis that they are smuggled goods.\nThat is the view taken by the High Court when it rejected the appellants prayer for a writ quashing the order of confiscation passed by the Collector of Central Excise in respect of the gold in question, and we see no reason to interfere with it.\nIt was, however, stated before the High Court by Mr. Abhyankar for the department that Anwar was, in fact, examined in the presence of the appellants counsel and the appellants counsel did not cross-examine him. This statement was accepted by Mr. Sorabji who appeared for the appellant and so, no valid complaint can be made that Anwar gave evidence in the absence of the appellant and the appellant bad no opportunity to cross-examine him. Then, as regards Marotrao and Rambhau, their statements were intended to show that the appellants case that he had got the gold melted through them was not true. At the enquiry, the appellant gave up this stand and did not adhere to his earlier version that the gold in question had been melted with the assistance of the said two witnesses. Since it became unnecessary to consider that plea because of the change of attitude adopted by the appellant, it was hardly necessary to allow the appellant to cross-examine the said two witnesses.\nTheir version on the point was no longer inconsistent with the subsequent case set up by the appellant.\nThe first feature on which the officer relied is supplied by the quantity of gold in question.\nThis large quantity of gold valued at nearly Rs. 30,000/- itself justified a reasonable belief in the mind of the officer that the gold may be smuggled.\nit may not be irrelevant to remember that the said officer had received positive information in the month of September, 1956, regarding the smuggling of gold by the appellant.\nThe appellant was found travelling without a Railway ticket and his explanation as to how he came to be. in the said passenger train is obviously untrue. A person carrying a, large quantity of gold and found travelling without a ticket may well have raised a reasonable belief in the mind of the officer that the gold was smuggled. The object of travelling without a ticket must have been to conceal the fact that the appellant had travelled all the way from Calcutta at which place the gold must have been smuggled.\nwhen we are dealing with a question as to whether the belief in the mind of the Officer who effected the seizure was reasonable or not, we are not sitting in appeal over the decision of the said officer. All that we can consider is whether there is ground which prima facie justifies the said reasonable belief." + }, + "1962_128": { + "expert_1": "By a communication dated April 5, 1930, from the Secretary to the Government of the Central Provinces addressed to the Commissioner Jabalpur Division, certain Nazul land was made available to the Municipal Committee of Jabalpur. In this letter the Secretary Stated I am directed by the Governor in Council with the previous sanction of the Government of India to communicate the following orders of the Government of the Central Provinces - Under Section 38(1)(f) of the Central Provinces Municipalities Act, 1922, Government is pleased to transfer to the Municipal Committee, Jubbiilpore, free of premium and ground rent nazul land measuring of the Jabbulpore town. The land shall vest in the Municipal Committee subject to the following conditions \nThe land shall be used only for the purpose of a garden and no part of it shall be used for any other purpose without the previous sanction of the Local Government. If condition 1 is broken the land shall be liable to be divested under section 38(2) and resumed by Government .and no compensation whatsoever shall be payable to the Municipal Committee upon such resumption. If the land. is resumed by Government for any Government purpose the provisions of Section 38(3) will apply. Sub-sections (2) (3) of s. 38 referred to ran 38. (2) The State Government may, by notification, direct that any property which has vested in the committee shall cease to be so vested, and thereupon the property speci- fied in the notification shall cease to be so vested and the State Government may pass such orders as it thinks fit regarding the disposal and management of such property. Where any immovable property is transferred, otherwise than by sales, by the State Government to a committee, for public purpose, it shall be deemed to be a condition of such transfer, unless specially provided to the contrary, that, should the property be at any time resumed by the Government, the compensation payable therefor shall notwith- standing any thing to the contrary in the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (1 of 1894), in no case exceed the amount, if any, paid to the Govern- ment for the transfer, together with the cost or the present value, whichever shall be less, of any buildings created or other works executed on the land by the committee. The land thus obtained was being used by the Municipal Committee in accordance with the condition of the transfer as a public garden. The Central Provinces Berar Municipalities Act, 1922 was repealed by the City of Jabalpur Corporation Act, 1948 (M.III of 1950). Under this later enactment the Municipal Committee was substituted by the Jabalpur Corporation, the appellant before us and all properties-movable and immovable-which were previously vested in the Municipal Committee were transferred to and vested in the Corporation (vide s. 71 of the Jabalpur Corporation Act), and by reason of the vesting, the appellant was in enjoyment of the transferred property. A hostel or boarding house of a public institution-the Hitkarni Mahavidyalaya had been located in a building constructed to the north of the Public Garden maintained by the Corporation. A public road ran to the south of the Public Garden and as there was not a proper and convenient access from the Boarding-house to the public road, the authorities of the Mahavidyalaya approached the State Government to obtain for them a narrow strip of land about 20 ft. wide at the eastern extremity of the Public Garden for the purpose of laying a public road which would provide this access. The Government considered this request reasonable and forwarded this request of the Mahavidyalaya, with a covering letter of their own dated April 28, 1959, to the Corporation for being complied with.- The request however was not acceded to and thereafter on February 11, 1960, the Government of Madhya Pradesh issued a notification under s. 81 of the Jabalpur Corporation Act notifying that the strip of land needed for making a road measuring 3, 940 sq. ft. stood divested from the Corporation., .Section 81 runs in these terms \n The Provincial Government may resume any immovable property, transferred to the Corporation by itself or by any local authority, where such property is required for a public purpose, without payment of any compensation other than the amount paid by the Corporation for such transfer and the market value at the date of resumption of any buildings or works subsequently reacted or executed thereon by the Corporation with the intention that such buildings or works should be permanent Provided that compensation need not be paid for buildings or works constructed or erected in contravention of the terms of the transfer. (The expression Provincial Government was amended so as to read State Government by the Adaptation of Laws Order). Complaining that this notification was illegal and beyond the jurisdiction of the State Government the Jabalpur Corporation moved the High Court of Madhya Pradesh for relief under Art-. 826 of the Constitution praying for the issue of the writ of mandamus quashing the notification of the government as without jurisdiction and forbidding the enforcement of that order. This was opposed both by the State of Madhya Pradesh as well as the Hitkarini Sabha and the learned Judges dismissed this petition. An application for a certificate of fitness for appeal to this Court filed by the Corporation was also dismissed and therefore the present appeal has been filed by special leave obtained under Art. 136 of the Constitution.\nThe reasoning was briefly as follows The learned Judges assumed, accepting a submission made on behalf of the appellant-Corporation during the arguments on the writ petition, that the authority which effected the transfer of the property to the Municipal Committee of Jabalpur by the order which we have set out as the opening of this judgment was not the Government of Central Provinces Berar but the Central Government. Starting from this premise, they concluded that the notification could not be sustained under the terms of s. 81. Section 81, it will be seen, empowers the State Government to resume immovable property transferred to the Corporation by itself when such property is required for a public purpose. If the property in question had been transferred by the Central Government, the argument ran that s. 81 was inapplicable. It should be added that both in the basic assumption that it was the Central and not the Local Government the predecessor of the State Government that had effected the transfer, as well as in the further consequence that the exercise of the power under s. 81 of the Corporation Act was ineffective, the learned Judges were aided by concessions accepting the correctness of this position which appear to have been made by the Deputy Advocate General who represented the State before them., We shall have occasion to refer to this aspect later. Meanwhile to proceed with the reasoning of the learned Judges, s. 81 being assumed not to be available to sustain the impugned notification, the learned Counsel for the State appears to have relied on the provisions of s. 38 of the Act of 1922 as enabling the State Government to resume the land, and this notwithstanding that by the Jabalpur Corporation Act III of 1950 the entirety of the C. \n Berar Municipalities Act of 1922 including s. 38 bad been expressly repealed. The learned Judges considered that this was possible by reason of a saving contained in s. 3 (1) of the Jabalpur Corporation Act which reads- 3. (1) All debts and obligations incurred, all contracts entered into with and all matters and things engaged to be done by or for, the Municipality of Jubbulpore, before this Act comes into force shall be deemed to have been incurred, entered into with or engaged to be done by, or for, the Corporation as constituted under this Act. Mr. Chatterji-learned Counsel for the appellant Corporation submitted to us that the learned Judges of the High Court bad wrongly applied the saving in s. 3 (1) of Act III of 1940 to sustain the resumption of land under the impugned notification.\nHe consider, however, that in view of our conclusion that the impugned notification fell clearly within the power vested in State Government under s. 81 of the Jabalpur Corporation Act, it is not necessary to pronounce upon the correctness of the submissions made to us on the construction of s. I (1) of that Act, There could not be any dispute that if the authority that had transferred the property covered by the impugned notification, to the Municipal Committee of Jabalpur was the Government of Central Provinces Berar, the right of the suceessor-Government viz. the State Government of Madhya Pradesh to take over the land from the Corporation for the purpose of forming a public road would manifestly be within their power under a. 81. That the Corporation of Jabalpur was the successor-in-title to the Municipal Committee of Jabalpur and. that the property which- was vested in the Municipal Committee of Jabalpur was transferred to and became vested in the appellant Corporation under s. 71 of the Jabalpur Corporation Act, were never in dispute and indeed formed the very basis of the appellants petition to the High Court. If any particular property had vested in the Municipal Committee subject to its being divested in particular contingencies, that the property in the hands of the Corporation would be held subject to the same obligations or disabilities could also not be in controversy. Nor could it be contested that the making of a public road is a public purpose for which land may be resumed by the State under s. \n What we desire to point out is that if the State of Madhya Pradesh was or must be deemed to have been the transferee of the property under the communication dated April 5, 1930, the validity of the notification under s. 81 could not be challenged.\nAs we have pointed out earlier, the learned Judges proceeded, however on the assumption that it was not the Government of C. P. Berar but the Central Government that was the transferrer of the land in question. There was, however, no basis upon which the learned Judges could have rested this assumption. In the first place, in the writ petition by which the appellant-Corporation challenged the validity of the notification it did not deny the fact that it was the Government of C. P. Berar that had effected the transfer, and, in fact, the allegations in the petition proceeded on the basis that it was the State Government that had done so but the contention raised was that on a proper construction of is. 81 it applied only to transfers made after the Jubbulpore Corporation Act, 1948 came into force- an untenable contention which has not been persisted in. The question as to who a transferor is obviously a question of fact or at best a mixed question of law and fact and when a party in a writ petition does not allege any such fact, it stands to reason that he ought not to be permitted to travel beyond the facts stated, at the stage of the arguments, To confine a party to his pleadings, particularly to his allegations as regards facts is dictated not merely by the need for orderliness in these proceedings but for avoiding surprise to the other party and consequent injustice resulting therefrom. Save in exceptional cases, parties should be held strictly to their pleadings and if owing to discovery of new matter or grounds, there is need to add to or to modify the allegations either in the petition or in the counter- affidavit, the Court should insist on formal amendments being effected, for this would enable each party to state its case with precision and definiteness and the other side would have a proper opportunity to know this case and meet it with appropriate defences. This salutary rule was not adhered to in this case, and the departure from the pleadings which the appellant was permitted to adopt during the course of its arguments before the High Court has led to injustice because thereby the Counsel for the State who was apparently not prepared, to meet an argument not raised in the petition, made submissions at the spur of the moment which were not justified by the true state of affairs.\nIn our opinion, on the allegations made in the petition by the appellant Corporation it ought not to have been permitted to put forward a case that the State Government was not the transferor of the property and the learned Judges of the High Court should have proceeded on the basis of the pleadings in the case.\nApart from this question of pleading, we consider that there is no merit in the contention even otherwise.\nWe have already set out the terms by which the transfer of the land was communicated to the Municipal Committee. The preamble recites that is what being communicated is the order of the Government of the Central Provinces. The words of conveyance are in the second paragraph and they read Under section 38(1)(f) of the Central Provinces Municipalities Act, 1922 Government is pleased to transfer to the Municipal Committee . The expression Government here obviously, in the context, means the Government of the Central Provinces. Paragraph 2 which specifies what should happen if the condition on which the land has been granted should be broken, states The land shall be liable to be. divested under s. 38 (2) and resumed by Government . Government here again obviously is the Government of the Central Provinces a construction reinforced if one looked at the sub-section referred to. Further, in Condition 3 which speaks of what was to happen if the land was resumed by Government for any Government purpose the reference to Government again is to the State Government. On the terms of the document therefore it was the Government of the Central Provinces that made the grant-the predecessor of the State Government.\nWe find therefore that there is no factual foundation for the submission which was apparently made before the High Court that the transfer in the present case was by the Central Government. No doubt, the communication refers to the fact that previous to making the grant the Government of C. P. Berar had obtained the approval of the Central Government, but that was merely a matter of administrative arrangement between the Central and Local Governments which is totally irrelevant for determining the identity of the Government which made the grant. Besides, the corporation having accepted the grant from the State Government was obviously estopped from contending that the land of which it continued in possession under that grant was not one by the State Government or that the State Government had not the authority to make the grant. If such contention is both not open to the Corporation and not tenable on the merits., it would follow that the impugned notification was fully justified by the, provisions under s. 81 of the Jabalpur Corporation Act.", + "expert_2": "The land shall vest in the Municipal Committee subject to the following conditions \nThe land shall be used only for the purpose of a garden and no part of it shall be used for any other purpose without the previous sanction of the Local Government. If condition 1 is broken the land shall be liable to be divested under section 38(2) and resumed by Government .and no compensation whatsoever shall be payable to the Municipal Committee upon such resumption. If the land. is resumed by Government for any Government purpose the provisions of Section 38(3) will apply.\nSub-sections (2) (3) of s. 38 referred to ran 38. (2) The State Government may, by notification, direct that any property which has vested in the committee shall cease to be so vested, and thereupon the property speci- fied in the notification shall cease to be so vested and the State Government may pass such orders as it thinks fit regarding the disposal and management of such property.\nThe Central Provinces Berar Municipalities Act, 1922 was repealed by the City of Jabalpur Corporation Act, 1948 (M.III of 1950). Under this later enactment the Municipal Committee was substituted by the Jabalpur Corporation, the appellant before us and all properties-movable and immovable-which were previously vested in the Municipal Committee were transferred to and vested in the Corporation (vide s. 71 of the Jabalpur Corporation Act), and by reason of the vesting, the appellant was in enjoyment of the transferred property.\nThe request however was not acceded to and thereafter on February 11, 1960, the Government of Madhya Pradesh issued a notification under s. 81 of the Jabalpur Corporation Act notifying that the strip of land needed for making a road measuring 3, 940 sq. ft. stood divested from the Corporation., .Section 81 runs in these terms \n The Provincial Government may resume any immovable property, transferred to the Corporation by itself or by any local authority, where such property is required for a public purpose, without payment of any compensation other than the amount paid by the Corporation for such transfer and the market value at the date of resumption of any buildings or works subsequently reacted or executed thereon by the Corporation with the intention that such buildings or works should be permanent Provided that compensation need not be paid for buildings or works constructed or erected in contravention of the terms of the transfer.\nthe authority which effected the transfer of the property to the Municipal Committee of Jabalpur by the order which we have set out as the opening of this judgment was not the Government of Central Provinces Berar but the Central Government. Starting from this premise, they concluded that the notification could not be sustained under the terms of s. 81. Section 81, it will be seen, empowers the State Government to resume immovable property transferred to the Corporation by itself when such property is required for a public purpose. If the property in question had been transferred by the Central Government, the argument ran that s. 81 was inapplicable.\nThe preamble recites that is what being communicated is the order of the Government of the Central Provinces. The words of conveyance are in the second paragraph and they read Under section 38(1)(f) of the Central Provinces Municipalities Act, 1922 Government is pleased to transfer to the Municipal Committee . The expression Government here obviously, in the context, means the Government of the Central Provinces. Paragraph 2 which specifies what should happen if the condition on which the land has been granted should be broken, states The land shall be liable to be. divested under s. 38 (2) and resumed by Government . Government here again obviously is the Government of the Central Provinces a construction reinforced if one looked at the sub-section referred to. Further, in Condition 3 which speaks of what was to happen if the land was resumed by Government for any Government purpose the reference to Government again is to the State Government. On the terms of the document therefore it was the Government of the Central Provinces that made the grant-the predecessor of the State Government. We find therefore that there is no factual foundation for the submission which was apparently made before the High Court that the transfer in the present case was by the Central Government.", + "expert_3": "By a communication dated April 5, 1930, from the Secretary to the Government of the Central Provinces addressed to the Commissioner Jabalpur Division, certain Nazul land was made available to the Municipal Committee of Jabalpur. In this letter the Secretary Stated I am directed by the Governor in Council with the previous sanction of the Government of India to communicate the following orders of the Government of the Central Provinces - Under Section 38(1)(f) of the Central Provinces Municipalities Act, 1922, Government is pleased to transfer to the Municipal Committee, Jubbiilpore, free of premium and ground rent nazul land measuring of the Jabbulpore town. The land shall vest in the Municipal Committee subject to the following conditions \nThe land shall be used only for the purpose of a garden and no part of it shall be used for any other purpose without the previous sanction of the Local Government. If condition 1 is broken the land shall be liable to be divested under section 38(2) and resumed by Government .and no compensation whatsoever shall be payable to the Municipal Committee upon such resumption. If the land. is resumed by Government for any Government purpose the provisions of Section 38(3) will apply\nSub-sections (2) (3) of s. 38 referred to ran 38. (2) The State Government may, by notification, direct that any property which has vested in the committee shall cease to be so vested, and thereupon the property speci- fied in the notification shall cease to be so vested and the State Government may pass such orders as it thinks fit regarding the disposal and management of such property. Where any immovable property is transferred, otherwise than by sales, by the State Government to a committee, for public purpose, it shall be deemed to be a condition of such transfer, unless specially provided to the contrary, that, should the property be at any time resumed by the Government, the compensation payable therefor shall notwith- standing any thing to the contrary in the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (1 of 1894), in no case exceed the amount, if any, paid to the Govern- ment for the transfer, together with the cost or the present value, whichever shall be less, of any buildings created or other works executed on the land by the committee\nThe land thus obtained was being used by the Municipal Committee in accordance with the condition of the transfer as a public garden. The Central Provinces Berar Municipalities Act, 1922 was repealed by the City of Jabalpur Corporation Act, 1948 (M.III of 1950). Under this later enactment the Municipal Committee was substituted by the Jabalpur Corporation, the appellant before us and all properties-movable and immovable-which were previously vested in the Municipal Committee were transferred to and vested in the Corporation (vide s. 71 of the Jabalpur Corporation Act), and by reason of the vesting, the appellant was in enjoyment of the transferred property.\nA hostel or boarding house of a public institution-the Hitkarni Mahavidyalaya had been located in a building constructed to the north of the Public Garden maintained by the Corporation. A public road ran to the south of the Public Garden and as there was not a proper and convenient access from the Boarding-house to the public road, the authorities of the Mahavidyalaya approached the State Government to obtain for them a narrow strip of land about 20 ft. wide at the eastern extremity of the Public Garden for the purpose of laying a public road which would provide this access\nThe Government considered this request reasonable and forwarded this request of the Mahavidyalaya, with a covering letter of their own dated April 28, 1959, to the Corporation for being complied with.- The request however was not acceded to and thereafter on February 11, 1960, the Government of Madhya Pradesh issued a notification under s. 81 of the Jabalpur Corporation Act notifying that the strip of land needed for making a road measuring 3, 940 sq. ft. stood divested from the Corporation\nComplaining that this notification was illegal and beyond the jurisdiction of the State Government the Jabalpur Corporation moved the High Court of Madhya Pradesh for relief under Art-. 826 of the Constitution praying for the issue of the writ of mandamus quashing the notification of the government as without jurisdiction and forbidding the enforcement of that order. This was opposed both by the State of Madhya Pradesh as well as the Hitkarini Sabha and the learned Judges dismissed this petition. An application for a certificate of fitness for appeal to this Court filed by the Corporation was also dismissed and therefore the present appeal has been filed by special leave obtained under Art. 136 of the Constitution\nSection 81, it will be seen, empowers the State Government to resume immovable property transferred to the Corporation by itself when such property is required for a public purpose. If the property in question had been transferred by the Central Government, the argument ran that s. 81 was inapplicable. It should be added that both in the basic assumption that it was the Central and not the Local Government the predecessor of the State Government that had effected the transfer, as well as in the further consequence that the exercise of the power under s. 81 of the Corporation Act was ineffective, the learned Judges were aided by concessions accepting the correctness of this position which appear to have been made by the Deputy Advocate General who represented the State before them., We shall have occasion to refer to this aspect later\nMeanwhile to proceed with the reasoning of the learned Judges, s. 81 being assumed not to be available to sustain the impugned notification, the learned Counsel for the State appears to have relied on the provisions of s. 38 of the Act of 1922 as enabling the State Government to resume the land, and this notwithstanding that by the Jabalpur Corporation Act III of 1950 the entirety of the C. \n Berar Municipalities Act of 1922 including s. 38 bad been expressly repealed. The learned Judges considered that this was possible by reason of a saving contained in s. 3 (1) of the Jabalpur Corporation Act which reads- 3. (1) All debts and obligations incurred, all contracts entered into with and all matters and things engaged to be done by or for, the Municipality of Jubbulpore, before this Act comes into force shall be deemed to have been incurred, entered into with or engaged to be done by, or for, the Corporation as constituted under this Act\nWhat we desire to point out is that if the State of Madhya Pradesh was or must be deemed to have been the transferee of the property under the communication dated April 5, 1930, the validity of the notification under s. 81 could not be challenged\nIn the first place, in the writ petition by which the appellant-Corporation challenged the validity of the notification it did not deny the fact that it was the Government of C. P. Berar that had effected the transfer, and, in fact, the allegations in the petition proceeded on the basis that it was the State Government that had done so but the contention raised was that on a proper construction of is. 81 it applied only to transfers made after the Jubbulpore Corporation Act, 1948 came into force- an untenable contention which has not been persisted in\nThe question as to who a transferor is obviously a question of fact or at best a mixed question of law and fact and when a party in a writ petition does not allege any such fact, it stands to reason that he ought not to be permitted to travel beyond the facts stated, at the stage of the arguments, To confine a party to his pleadings, particularly to his allegations as regards facts is dictated not merely by the need for orderliness in these proceedings but for avoiding surprise to the other party and consequent injustice resulting therefrom\nSave in exceptional cases, parties should be held strictly to their pleadings and if owing to discovery of new matter or grounds, there is need to add to or to modify the allegations either in the petition or in the counter- affidavit, the Court should insist on formal amendments being effected, for this would enable each party to state its case with precision and definiteness and the other side would have a proper opportunity to know this case and meet it with appropriate defences\nThis salutary rule was not adhered to in this case, and the departure from the pleadings which the appellant was permitted to adopt during the course of its arguments before the High Court has led to injustice because thereby the Counsel for the State who was apparently not prepared, to meet an argument not raised in the petition, made submissions at the spur of the moment which were not justified by the true state of affairs. In our opinion, on the allegations made in the petition by the appellant Corporation it ought not to have been permitted to put forward a case that the State Government was not the transferor of the property and the learned Judges of the High Court should have proceeded on the basis of the pleadings in the case.\nWe have already set out the terms by which the transfer of the land was communicated to the Municipal Committee. The preamble recites that is what being communicated is the order of the Government of the Central Provinces\nThe words of conveyance are in the second paragraph and they read Under section 38(1)(f) of the Central Provinces Municipalities Act, 1922 Government is pleased to transfer to the Municipal Committee . The expression Government here obviously, in the context, means the Government of the Central Provinces. Paragraph 2 which specifies what should happen if the condition on which the land has been granted should be broken, states The land shall be liable to be. divested under s. 38 (2) and resumed by Government\nGovernment here again obviously is the Government of the Central Provinces a construction reinforced if one looked at the sub-section referred to. Further, in Condition 3 which speaks of what was to happen if the land was resumed by Government for any Government purpose the reference to Government again is to the State Government\nOn the terms of the document therefore it was the Government of the Central Provinces that made the grant-the predecessor of the State Government. We find therefore that there is no factual foundation for the submission which was apparently made before the High Court that the transfer in the present case was by the Central Government\nNo doubt, the communication refers to the fact that previous to making the grant the Government of C. P. Berar had obtained the approval of the Central Government, but that was merely a matter of administrative arrangement between the Central and Local Governments which is totally irrelevant for determining the identity of the Government which made the grant.\nBesides, the corporation having accepted the grant from the State Government was obviously estopped from contending that the land of which it continued in possession under that grant was not one by the State Government or that the State Government had not the authority to make the grant. If such contention is both not open to the Corporation and not tenable on the merits., it would follow that the impugned notification was fully justified by the, provisions under s. 81 of the Jabalpur Corporation Act", + "expert_4": "-By a communication dated April 5, 1930, from the Secretary to the Government of the Central Provinces addressed to the Commissioner Jabalpur Division, certain Nazul land was made available to the Municipal Committee of Jabalpur.\nIn this letter the Secretary Stated I am directed by the Governor in Council with the previous sanction of the Government of India to communicate the following orders of the Government of the Central Provinces - Under Section 38(1)(f) of the Central Provinces Municipalities Act, 1922, Government is pleased to transfer to the Municipal Committee, Jubbiilpore, free of premium and ground rent nazul land measuring of the Jabbulpore town.\nThe land shall vest in the Municipal Committee subject to the following conditions \nThe land shall be used only for the purpose of a garden and no part of it shall be used for any other purpose without the previous sanction of the Local Government.\nIf condition 1 is broken the land shall be liable to be divested under section 38(2) and resumed by Government .and no compensation whatsoever shall be payable to the Municipal Committee upon such resumption.\nIf the land. is resumed by Government for any Government purpose the provisions of Section 38(3) will apply.\nSub-sections (2) (3) of s. 38 referred to ran 38. (2) The State Government may, by notification, direct that any property which has vested in the committee shall cease to be so vested, and thereupon the property speci- fied in the notification shall cease to be so vested and the State Government may pass such orders as it thinks fit regarding the disposal and management of such property.\nWhere any immovable property is transferred, otherwise than by sales, by the State Government to a committee, for public purpose, it shall be deemed to be a condition of such transfer, unless specially provided to the contrary, that, should the property be at any time resumed by the Government, the compensation payable therefor shall notwith- standing any thing to the contrary in the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (1 of 1894), in no case exceed the amount, if any, paid to the Govern- ment for the transfer, together with the cost or the present value, whichever shall be less, of any buildings created or other works executed on the land by the committee.\nThe land thus obtained was being used by the Municipal Committee in accordance with the condition of the transfer as a public garden.\nThe Central Provinces Berar Municipalities Act, 1922 was repealed by the City of Jabalpur Corporation Act, 1948 (M.III of 1950). Under this later enactment the Municipal Committee was substituted by the Jabalpur Corporation, the appellant before us and all properties-movable and immovable-which were previously vested in the Municipal Committee were transferred to and vested in the Corporation (vide s. 71 of the Jabalpur Corporation Act), and by reason of the vesting, the appellant was in enjoyment of the transferred property.\nA hostel or boarding house of a public institution-the Hitkarni Mahavidyalaya had been located in a building constructed to the north of the Public Garden maintained by the Corporation.\nA public road ran to the south of the Public Garden and as there was not a proper and convenient access from the Boarding-house to the public road, the authorities of the Mahavidyalaya approached the State Government to obtain for them a narrow strip of land about 20 ft. wide at the eastern extremity of the Public Garden for the purpose of laying a public road which would provide this access.\nThe Government considered this request reasonable and forwarded this request of the Mahavidyalaya, with a covering letter of their own dated April 28, 1959, to the Corporation for being complied with.- The request however was not acceded to and thereafter on February 11, 1960, the Government of Madhya Pradesh issued a notification under s. 81 of the Jabalpur Corporation Act notifying that the strip of land needed for making a road measuring 3, 940 sq. ft. stood divested from the Corporation., .Section 81 runs in these terms \n The Provincial Government may resume any immovable property, transferred to the Corporation by itself or by any local authority, where such property is required for a public purpose, without payment of any compensation other than the amount paid by the Corporation for such transfer and the market value at the date of resumption of any buildings or works subsequently reacted or executed thereon by the Corporation with the intention that such buildings or works should be permanent Provided that compensation need not be paid for buildings or works constructed or erected in contravention of the terms of the transfer.\n(The expression Provincial Government was amended so as to read State Government by the Adaptation of Laws Order).\nComplaining that this notification was illegal and beyond the jurisdiction of the State Government the Jabalpur Corporation moved the High Court of Madhya Pradesh for relief under Art-. 826 of the Constitution praying for the issue of the writ of mandamus quashing the notification of the government as without jurisdiction and forbidding the enforcement of that order.\nThis was opposed both by the State of Madhya Pradesh as well as the Hitkarini Sabha and the learned Judges dismissed this petition.\nAn application for a certificate of fitness for appeal to this Court filed by the Corporation was also dismissed and therefore the present appeal has been filed by special leave obtained under Art. 136 of the Constitution.\nThe learned Judges assumed, accepting a submission made on behalf of the appellant-Corporation during the arguments on the writ petition, that the authority which effected the transfer of the property to the Municipal Committee of Jabalpur by the order which we have set out as the opening of this judgment was not the Government of Central Provinces Berar but the Central Government.\nStarting from this premise, they concluded that the notification could not be sustained under the terms of s. 81.\nSection 81, it will be seen, empowers the State Government to resume immovable property transferred to the Corporation by itself when such property is required for a public purpose. If the property in question had been transferred by the Central Government, the argument ran that s. 81 was inapplicable.\nIt should be added that both in the basic assumption that it was the Central and not the Local Government the predecessor of the State Government that had effected the transfer, as well as in the further consequence that the exercise of the power under s. 81 of the Corporation Act was ineffective, the learned Judges were aided by concessions accepting the correctness of this position which appear to have been made by the Deputy Advocate General who represented the State before them., We shall have occasion to refer to this aspect later.\nMeanwhile to proceed with the reasoning of the learned Judges, s. 81 being assumed not to be available to sustain the impugned notification, the learned Counsel for the State appears to have relied on the provisions of s. 38 of the Act of 1922 as enabling the State Government to resume the land, and this notwithstanding that by the Jabalpur Corporation Act III of 1950 the entirety of the C. \n Berar Municipalities Act of 1922 including s. 38 bad been expressly repealed.\nThe learned Judges considered that this was possible by reason of a saving contained in s. 3 (1) of the Jabalpur Corporation Act which reads- 3. (1) All debts and obligations incurred, all contracts entered into with and all matters and things engaged to be done by or for, the Municipality of Jubbulpore, before this Act comes into force shall be deemed to have been incurred, entered into with or engaged to be done by, or for, the Corporation as constituted under this Act.\nMr. Chatterji-learned Counsel for the appellant Corporation submitted to us that the learned Judges of the High Court bad wrongly applied the saving in s. 3 (1) of Act III of 1940 to sustain the resumption of land under the impugned notification.\nHe consider, however, that in view of our conclusion that the impugned notification fell clearly within the power vested in State Government under s. 81 of the Jabalpur Corporation Act, it is not necessary to pronounce upon the correctness of the submissions made to us on the construction of s.\nI (1) of that Act, There could not be any dispute that if the authority that had transferred the property covered by the impugned notification, to the Municipal Committee of Jabalpur was the Government of Central Provinces Berar, the right of the suceessor-Government viz. the State Government of Madhya Pradesh to take over the land from the Corporation for the purpose of forming a public road would manifestly be within their power under a. 81.\nThat the Corporation of Jabalpur was the successor-in-title to the Municipal Committee of Jabalpur and. that the property which- was vested in the Municipal Committee of Jabalpur was transferred to and became vested in the appellant Corporation under s. 71 of the Jabalpur Corporation Act, were never in dispute and indeed formed the very basis of the appellants petition to the High Court.\nIf any particular property had vested in the Municipal Committee subject to its being divested in particular contingencies, that the property in the hands of the Corporation would be held subject to the same obligations or disabilities could also not be in controversy. Nor could it be contested that the making of a public road is a public purpose for which land may be resumed by the State under s.\nWhat we desire to point out is that if the State of Madhya Pradesh was or must be deemed to have been the transferee of the property under the communication dated April 5, 1930, the validity of the notification under s. 81 could not be challenged.\nAs we have pointed out earlier, the learned Judges proceeded, however on the assumption that it was not the Government of C. P. Berar but the Central Government that was the transferrer of the land in question. There was, however, no basis upon which the learned Judges could have rested this assumption.\nIn the first place, in the writ petition by which the appellant-Corporation challenged the validity of the notification it did not deny the fact that it was the Government of C. P. Berar that had effected the transfer, and, in fact, the allegations in the petition proceeded on the basis that it was the State Government that had done so but the contention raised was that on a proper construction of is. 81 it applied only to transfers made after the Jubbulpore Corporation Act, 1948 came into force- an untenable contention which has not been persisted in.\nThe question as to who a transferor is obviously a question of fact or at best a mixed question of law and fact and when a party in a writ petition does not allege any such fact, it stands to reason that he ought not to be permitted to travel beyond the facts stated, at the stage of the arguments, To confine a party to his pleadings, particularly to his allegations as regards facts is dictated not merely by the need for orderliness in these proceedings but for avoiding surprise to the other party and consequent injustice resulting therefrom.\nSave in exceptional cases, parties should be held strictly to their pleadings and if owing to discovery of new matter or grounds, there is need to add to or to modify the allegations either in the petition or in the counter- affidavit, the Court should insist on formal amendments being effected, for this would enable each party to state its case with precision and definiteness and the other side would have a proper opportunity to know this case and meet it with appropriate defences.\nThis salutary rule was not adhered to in this case, and the departure from the pleadings which the appellant was permitted to adopt during the course of its arguments before the High Court has led to injustice because thereby the Counsel for the State who was apparently not prepared, to meet an argument not raised in the petition, made submissions at the spur of the moment which were not justified by the true state of affairs.\nIn our opinion, on the allegations made in the petition by the appellant Corporation it ought not to have been permitted to put forward a case that the State Government was not the transferor of the property and the learned Judges of the High Court should have proceeded on the basis of the pleadings in the case.\nApart from this question of pleading, we consider that there is no merit in the contention even otherwise.\nWe have already set out the terms by which the transfer of the land was communicated to the Municipal Committee. The preamble recites that is what being communicated is the order of the Government of the Central Provinces. The words of conveyance are in the second paragraph and they read Under section 38(1)(f) of the Central Provinces Municipalities Act, 1922 Government is pleased to transfer to the Municipal Committee .\nThe expression Government here obviously, in the context, means the Government of the Central Provinces. Paragraph 2 which specifies what should happen if the condition on which the land has been granted should be broken, states The land shall be liable to be. divested under s. 38 (2) and resumed by Government . Government here again obviously is the Government of the Central Provinces a construction reinforced if one looked at the sub-section referred to.\nFurther, in Condition 3 which speaks of what was to happen if the land was resumed by Government for any Government purpose the reference to Government again is to the State Government.\nOn the terms of the document therefore it was the Government of the Central Provinces that made the grant-the predecessor of the State Government. We find therefore that there is no factual foundation for the submission which was apparently made before the High Court that the transfer in the present case was by the Central Government.\nNo doubt, the communication refers to the fact that previous to making the grant the Government of C. P\nBerar had obtained the approval of the Central Government, but that was merely a matter of administrative arrangement between the Central and Local Governments which is totally irrelevant for determining the identity of the Government which made the grant. Besides, the corporation having accepted the grant from the State Government was obviously estopped from contending that the land of which it continued in possession under that grant was not one by the State Government or that the State Government had not the authority to make the grant.\nIf such contention is both not open to the Corporation and not tenable on the merits., it would follow that the impugned notification was fully justified by the, provisions under s. 81 of the Jabalpur Corporation Act.", + "expert_5": "By a communication dated April 5, 1930, from the Secretary to the Government of the Central Provinces addressed to the Commissioner Jabalpur Division, certain Nazul land was made available to the Municipal Committee of Jabalpur.\nSecretary to the Government of the Central Provinces\nThere could not be any dispute that if the authority that had transferred the property covered by the impugned notification, to the Municipal Committee of Jabalpur was the Government of Central Provinces Berar, the right of the suceessor-Government viz. the State Government of Madhya Pradesh to take over the land from the Corporation for the purpose of forming a public road would manifestly be within their power under a. 81.\nif the State of Madhya Pradesh was or must be deemed to have been the transferee of the property under the communication dated April 5, 1930, the validity of the notification under s. 81 could not be challenged.\nIn the first place, in the writ petition by which the appellant-Corporation challenged the validity of the notification it did not deny the fact that it was the Government of C. P. Berar that had effected the transfer, and, in fact, the allegations in the petition proceeded on the basis that it was the State Government that had done so but the contention raised was that on a proper construction of is. 81 it applied only to transfers made after the Jubbulpore Corporation Act, 1948 came into force- an untenable contention which has not been persisted in.\nTo confine a party to his pleadings, particularly to his allegations as regards facts is dictated not merely by the need for orderliness in these proceedings but for avoiding surprise to the other party and consequent injustice resulting therefrom.\nSave in exceptional cases, parties should be held strictly to their pleadings\nif owing to discovery of new matter or grounds, there is need to add to or to modify the allegations either in the petition or in the counter- affidavit, the Court should insist on formal amendments being effected, for this would enable each party to state its case with precision and definiteness and the other side would have a proper opportunity to know this case and meet it with appropriate defences.\nfor this would enable each party to state its case with precision and definiteness and the other side would have a proper opportunity to know this case and meet it with appropriate defences\nthe departure from the pleadings which the appellant was permitted to adopt during the course of its arguments before the High Court has led to injustice because thereby the Counsel for the State who was apparently not prepared, to meet an argument not raised in the petition, made submissions at the spur of the moment which were not justified by the true state of affairs.\nThe preamble recites that is what being communicated is the order of the Government of the Central Provinces.\nThe words of conveyance are in the second paragraph and they read Under section 38(1)(f) of the Central Provinces Municipalities Act, 1922 Government is pleased to transfer to the Municipal Committee . The expression Government here obviously, in the context, means the Government of the Central Provinces. Paragraph 2 which specifies what should happen if the condition on which the land has been granted should be broken, states The land shall be liable to be. divested under s. 38 (2) and resumed by Government . Government here again obviously is the Government of the Central Provinces a construction reinforced if one looked at the sub-section referred to.\nFurther, in Condition 3 which speaks of what was to happen if the land was resumed by Government for any Government purpose the reference to Government again is to the State Government. On the terms of the document therefore it was the Government of the Central Provinces that made the grant-the predecessor of the State Government.\nNo doubt, the communication refers to the fact that previous to making the grant the Government of C. P. Berar had obtained the approval of the Central Government, but that was merely a matter of administrative arrangement between the Central and Local Governments which is totally irrelevant for determining the identity of the Government which made the grant.\nBesides, the corporation having accepted the grant from the State Government was obviously estopped from contending that the land of which it continued in possession under that grant was not one by the State Government or that the State Government had not the authority to make the grant" + }, + "1962_207": { + "expert_1": "This appeal by special leave is against the order of the High Court at Allahabad under s. 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.\nThere was some dispute between these appellants and the Municipal Board which it is suggested by the appellants was really behind the move to get this order under s. 133 passed against them. It is unnecessary, however, for us to consider that matter.\nWhat appears to be clear is that the trade is carried on in a private house in the subzimandi quarter and it does happen that some amount of inconvenience is caused to people who pass by the public road because of the carts which necessarily come near this house.\nThe real question is, whether because this trade of auctioning vegetables which the appellants carry on in their private house produce the consequence that people passing by the road are put to inconvenience, action can be taken under s. 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. \nThe High Court seems to be of the opinion - when it is clear that the business of auctioning vegetables cannot be carried on without causing obstruction to the passers by, the conduct of the business can be prohibited, even though it is carried on in a private place.\nIt seems to us that this proposition has been put too widely.\nSection 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure empowers action by the District Magistrate, Sub-Divisional Magistrate of Magistrate 1st class to remove public nuisances in certain circumstances. Two out of the several cls. of s. 133(1) in which these circumstances are set out, with which we are concerned, are the first and second clauses. The first clause provides for action by Magistrate where he considers, on receiving a police-report or other information and on taking such evidence as he thinks fit, that any unlawful obstruction or nuisance should be removed from any way, river or channel which is or may be lawfully used by the public or from any public place. The second clause deals with the position where the conduct of any trade or occupation or the keeping of any goods or merchandise, is injurious to the health or physical comfort of the community and that in consequence such trade or occupation should be prohibited or regulated or such goods or merchandise should be removed or the keeping thereof regulated.\nIt is difficult to see how the first clause can have any application.\nUnlawful obstruction, if any, is certainly not caused by the people who carry on the trade of auctioning. If the obstruction caused by keeping the carts on the road can be considered to be unlawful obstruction within the meaning of this clause - about which we express no opinion action can be taken against the persons causing such obstruction. The obvious difficulty in the way of that might be that the persons who bring the carts are not the same from day do day.\nBut whether or not any action is possible under s. 133 against the persons bringing the carts, we are unable to agree that merely because the appellants carry on auctioning in connection with which the carts are brought, they can be considered to have caused the obstruction.\nIn our opinion, the appellants cannot be considered to be the persons causing obstruction.\nTurning now to the next clause, the question arises how the conduct of this auctioning trade is injurious to the health or physical comfort of the community. Undoubtedly, some amount of noise the auction is going on. That however is a necessary concomitant of buying and selling large quantities and it will be unreasonable to think that merely because some amount of noise is caused which people preferring perfect peace may not like, this is injurious to the physical comfort, or health of the community.\nIt appears to us that the conduct of trades of this nature and indeed of other trades in localities of a city where such trades are usually carried on, is bound to produce some discomfort, though at the same time resulting perhaps in the good of the community in other respects. If a trade like auctioning which has to be carried on as necessary for the well being of the community, some amount of noise has to be borne in at least that part of the town where such trade is ordinarily carried on. \nIn making the provisions of s. 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the legislature cannot have intended the stoppage of such trades in such part of the town, merely because of the discomfort caused by the noise in carrying on the trade. In our opinion therefore, the slight discomfort that may be caused to some people passing by the road or living in the neighbourhood cannot ordinarily be considered to be such as to justify action under s. 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. We do not think that the orders are justified under s. 133.", + "expert_2": "What appears to be clear is that the trade is carried on in a private house in the subzimandi quarter and it does happen that some amount of inconvenience is caused to people who pass by the public road because of the carts which necessarily come near this house.\nwhether because this trade of auctioning vegetables which the appellants carry on in their private house produce the consequence that people passing by the road are put to inconvenience, action can be taken under s. 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.\nSection 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure empowers action by the District Magistrate, Sub-Divisional Magistrate of Magistrate 1st class to remove public nuisances in certain circumstances.\nTwo out of the several cls. of s. 133(1) in which these circumstances are set out, with which we are concerned, are the first and second clauses.\nUnlawful obstruction, if any, is certainly not caused by the people who carry on the trade of auctioning. If the obstruction caused by keeping the carts on the road can be considered to be unlawful obstruction within the meaning of this clause - about which we express no opinion action can be taken against the persons causing such obstruction. The obvious difficulty in the way of that might be that the persons who bring the carts are not the same from day do day.\nthe appellants cannot be considered to be the persons causing obstruction.\nsome amount of noise the auction is going on. That however is a necessary concomitant of buying and selling large quantities and it will be unreasonable to think that merely because some amount of noise is caused which people preferring perfect peace may not like, this is injurious to the physical comfort, or health of the community.\nIn making the provisions of s. 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the legislature cannot have intended the stoppage of such trades in such part of the town, merely because of the discomfort caused by the noise in carrying on the trade. In our opinion therefore, the slight discomfort that may be caused to some people passing by the road or living in the neighbourhood cannot ordinarily be considered to be such as to justify action under s. 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.", + "expert_3": "The three appellants carry on the trade of auctioning vegetables. These vegetables, it appears, are brought in carts which are parked on the public road outside the building where the auctioning takes place.\nWhat appears to be clear is that the trade is carried on in a private house in the subzimandi quarter and it does happen that some amount of inconvenience is caused to people who pass by the public road because of the carts which necessarily come near this house\nThe real question is, whether because this trade of auctioning vegetables which the appellants carry on in their private house produce the consequence that people passing by the road are put to inconvenience, action can be taken under s. 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.\nThe High Court seems to be of the opinion - when it is clear that the business of auctioning vegetables cannot be carried on without causing obstruction to the passers by, the conduct of the business can be prohibited, even though it is carried on in a private place.\nIt seems to us that this proposition has been put too widely. Section 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure empowers action by the District Magistrate, Sub-Divisional Magistrate of Magistrate 1st class to remove public nuisances in certain circumstances. Two out of the several cls. of s. 133(1) in which these circumstances are set out, with which we are concerned, are the first and second clauses.\nThe first clause provides for action by Magistrate where he considers, on receiving a police-report or other information and on taking such evidence as he thinks fit, that any unlawful obstruction or nuisance should be removed from any way, river or channel which is or may be lawfully used by the public or from any public place. The second clause deals with the position where the conduct of any trade or occupation or the keeping of any goods or merchandise, is injurious to the health or physical comfort of the community and that in consequence such trade or occupation should be prohibited or regulated or such goods or merchandise should be removed or the keeping thereof regulated\nIt is difficult to see how the first clause can have any application.\nUnlawful obstruction, if any, is certainly not caused by the people who carry on the trade of auctioning. If the obstruction caused by keeping the carts on the road can be considered to be unlawful obstruction within the meaning of this clause - about which we express no opinion action can be taken against the persons causing such obstruction\nThe obvious difficulty in the way of that might be that the persons who bring the carts are not the same from day do day. But whether or not any action is possible under s. 133 against the persons bringing the carts, we are unable to agree that merely because the appellants carry on auctioning in connection with which the carts are brought, they can be considered to have caused the obstruction.\nIn our opinion, the appellants cannot be considered to be the persons causing obstruction\nthe question arises how the conduct of this auctioning trade is injurious to the health or physical comfort of the community. Undoubtedly, some amount of noise the auction is going on. That however is a necessary concomitant of buying and selling large quantities and it will be unreasonable to think that merely because some amount of noise is caused which people preferring perfect peace may not like, this is injurious to the physical comfort, or health of the community. It appears to us that the conduct of trades of this nature and indeed of other trades in localities of a city where such trades are usually carried on, is bound to produce some discomfort, though at the same time resulting perhaps in the good of the community in other respects.\nIf a trade like auctioning which has to be carried on as necessary for the well being of the community, some amount of noise has to be borne in at least that part of the town where such trade is ordinarily carried on\nIn making the provisions of s. 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the legislature cannot have intended the stoppage of such trades in such part of the town, merely because of the discomfort caused by the noise in carrying on the trade. In our opinion therefore, the slight discomfort that may be caused to some people passing by the road or living in the neighbourhood cannot ordinarily be considered to be such as to justify action under s. 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. We do not think that the orders are justified under s. 133", + "expert_4": "There was some dispute between these appellants and the Municipal Board which it is suggested by the appellants was really behind the move to get this order under s. 133 passed against them. It is unnecessary, however, for us to consider that matter.\nWhat appears to be clear is that the trade is carried on in a private house in the subzimandi quarter and it does happen that some amount of inconvenience is caused to people who pass by the public road because of the carts which necessarily come near this house.\nThe real question is, whether because this trade of auctioning vegetables which the appellants carry on in their private house produce the consequence that people passing by the road are put to inconvenience, action can be taken under s. 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.\nThe High Court seems to be of the opinion - when it is clear that the business of auctioning vegetables cannot be carried on without causing obstruction to the passers by, the conduct of the business can be prohibited, even though it is carried on in a private place.\nIt seems to us that this proposition has been put too widely.\nSection 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure empowers action by the District Magistrate, Sub-Divisional Magistrate of Magistrate 1st class to remove public nuisances in certain circumstances.\nTwo out of the several cls. of s. 133(1) in which these circumstances are set out, with which we are concerned, are the first and second clauses.\nThe first clause provides for action by Magistrate where he considers, on receiving a police-report or other information and on taking such evidence as he thinks fit, that any unlawful obstruction or nuisance should be removed from any way, river or channel which is or may be lawfully used by the public or from any public place.\nThe second clause deals with the position where the conduct of any trade or occupation or the keeping of any goods or merchandise, is injurious to the health or physical comfort of the community and that in consequence such trade or occupation should be prohibited or regulated or such goods or merchandise should be removed or the keeping thereof regulated.\nIt is difficult to see how the first clause can have any application.\nUnlawful obstruction, if any, is certainly not caused by the people who carry on the trade of auctioning.\nIf the obstruction caused by keeping the carts on the road can be considered to be unlawful obstruction within the meaning of this clause - about which we express no opinion action can be taken against the persons causing such obstruction. The obvious difficulty in the way of that might be that the persons who bring the carts are not the same from day do day.\nBut whether or not any action is possible under s. 133 against the persons bringing the carts, we are unable to agree that merely because the appellants carry on auctioning in connection with which the carts are brought, they can be considered to have caused the obstruction.\nIn our opinion, the appellants cannot be considered to be the persons causing obstruction.\nTurning now to the next clause, the question arises how the conduct of this auctioning trade is injurious to the health or physical comfort of the community. Undoubtedly, some amount of noise the auction is going on.\nThat however is a necessary concomitant of buying and selling large quantities and it will be unreasonable to think that merely because some amount of noise is caused which people preferring perfect peace may not like, this is injurious to the physical comfort, or health of the community.\nIt appears to us that the conduct of trades of this nature and indeed of other trades in localities of a city where such trades are usually carried on, is bound to produce some discomfort, though at the same time resulting perhaps in the good of the community in other respects.\nIf a trade like auctioning which has to be carried on as necessary for the well being of the community, some amount of noise has to be borne in at least that part of the town where such trade is ordinarily carried on. \nIn making the provisions of s. 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the legislature cannot have intended the stoppage of such trades in such part of the town, merely because of the discomfort caused by the noise in carrying on the trade.\nIn our opinion therefore, the slight discomfort that may be caused to some people passing by the road or living in the neighbourhood cannot ordinarily be considered to be such as to justify action under s. 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.\nWe do not think that the orders are justified under s. 133.", + "expert_5": "What appears to be clear is that the trade is carried on in a private house in the subzimandi quarter and it does happen that some amount of inconvenience is caused to people who pass by the public road because of the carts which necessarily come near this house.\nit does happen that some amount of inconvenience is caused to people who pass by the public road because of the carts which necessarily come near this house.\nThe first clause provides for action by Magistrate where he considers, on receiving a police-report or other information and on taking such evidence as he thinks fit, that any unlawful obstruction or nuisance should be removed from any way, river or channel which is or may be lawfully used by the public or from any public place.\nunlawful obstruction\nThe second clause deals with the position where the conduct of any trade or occupation or the keeping of any goods or merchandise, is injurious to the health or physical comfort of the community and that in consequence such trade or occupation should be prohibited or regulated or such goods or merchandise should be removed or the keeping thereof regulated.\ninjurious to the health or physical comfort\nUnlawful obstruction, if any, is certainly not caused by the people who carry on the trade of auctioning.\nIf the obstruction caused by keeping the carts on the road can be considered to be unlawful obstruction within the meaning of this clause - about which we express no opinion action can be taken against the persons causing such obstruction.\nThe obvious difficulty in the way of that might be that the persons who bring the carts are not the same from day do day.\nBut whether or not any action is possible under s. 133 against the persons bringing the carts, we are unable to agree that merely because the appellants carry on auctioning in connection with which the carts are brought, they can be considered to have caused the obstruction.\nthe appellants cannot be considered to be the persons causing obstruction.\nThat however is a necessary concomitant of buying and selling large quantities and it will be unreasonable to think that merely because some amount of noise is caused which people preferring perfect peace may not like, this is injurious to the physical comfort, or health of the community.\nIt appears to us that the conduct of trades of this nature and indeed of other trades in localities of a city where such trades are usually carried on, is bound to produce some discomfort, though at the same time resulting perhaps in the good of the community in other respects.\nIf a trade like auctioning which has to be carried on as necessary for the well being of the community, some amount of noise has to be borne in at least that part of the town where such trade is ordinarily carried on.\nthe legislature cannot have intended the stoppage of such trades in such part of the town, merely because of the discomfort caused by the noise in carrying on the trade.\nIn our opinion therefore, the slight discomfort that may be caused to some people passing by the road or living in the neighbourhood cannot ordinarily be considered to be such as to justify action under s. 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. We do not think that the orders are justified under s. 133." + }, + "1962_213": { + "expert_1": "This appeal on a certificate of fitness granted by the High Court under Act 134(1), (c). of the Constitution, is directed against the order of a Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court dated December 21, 1960, setting aside the order of acquittal passed by the trial Magistrate, dated July 2, 1958. We heard this appeal on the eve of the long vacation and pronounced our order to the effect that the appeal was allowed and the order of acquittal was to stand, and that reasons would be given later. It appears that the appellant, who it a practising lawyer, had been employed by the respondent to work for him to investigate the title to some property which the latter was about to purchase, sometime in October 1952. The prosecution case was that the respondent had entrusted the. sum of Rs. 5000/- to the appellant for depositing in Court in connection with an application in respect of the proposed transaction, under the Bengal Money Lenders Act, and that the appellant having been so entrusted with the money, in breach of trust, misappropriated the amount, thus causing loss to his client. The appellant was, therefore, charged under s. 409 of the Indian Penal Code, with having committed criminal breach of trust in respect of the sum of Rs. 5000/- , which had been entrusted to him as a lawyer on behalf of the respondent. \nThe appellant defense was that the case, against him was false and that he had been falsely implicated for reasons which need not be stated. In order to substantiate the charge against him, the complainant (now respondents examined himself and a number of witnesses. He also adduced in evidence a certain document, marketed Ex. 1, purporting to be a letter in the handwriting of the appellant, to show that Rs. 4200/- being a portion of the amount of Rs. 5000/- required for the deposit, had been asked for by the appellant. It also con- tained writings in the hand of the complainant owing that there was correspondence in the matter of the deposit. That was a very important piece of evidence, which if genuine could go a long way to prove the case against the appellant. But the appellant challenged the document as a forgery in material parts, and cross- examined the complainant who had produced the document. In spite of the fact that the complainant was very pointedly cross-examined with a view to showing that the document placed before the Court was a forgery in material parts, the complainant did not take any steps to get an expert on handwriting examined. The trial Court, on an examination of-the evidence, oral and documentary, came to the conclusion that the case against the accused had not been proved and acquitted him. The complainant preferred an appeal to the High Court against the order of acquittal, which was heard by a Division Bench, The High Court took the view that, in the circumstances of the case, there should be retrial by another magistrate, who should give an opportunity to the complainant to adduce the evidence of a handwriting expert in order to establish the genuineness of the questioned document. Apparently, the High court, sitting in appeal on the judgment of the acquittal, passed by the learned Magistrate, was not satisfied as to the genuineness of the questioned document. Otherwise it could have pronounced its judgment one way or the other, on the merits of the controversy, whether or not the prosecution had succeeded in bringing the charge home to the accused. If it were not a case between a lawyer as an accused and his client as the complainant, perhaps the High Court may not have taken the unusual course of giving a fresh opportunity to the complainant to have second round of litigation, to the great prejudice of the accused. \nIn this connection, the following observations of the High Court may be extracted in order to show the reasons.for the unusual course it took in this case Thus there can be no doubt that this was a document of considerable importance. According to the prosecution it clearly showed the respondents connection with the sum of Rs. 4200/- which was a part of the sum of Rs. 5000/-, the subject matter of the charge. According to the respondent, the figures 4200 and the Bengali word sankranta were for- geries just as at the bottom of the document the word yes and the signature of the res- pondent with date were also forgeries.\nThis case was clearly put by the respondent to Bimla, Krishna Ben and it was suggested to him that the- impugned portions of the document were clear forgeries made by the appellant in order to falsely implicate the respondent. It must be said that inspite of this challenge, the appellant took no steps what. ever to produce expert evidence to aid the court in coming to a conclusion as to the authorship of the impugned portion of the document. It is true that expert evidence cannot always be a final settler still in a call of this kind, it is eminently desirable that the court should be assisted by a qualified expert since almost the whole case depends upon proof of the fact whether the impugned portions of that document were in the hand of the respondent Comment was also made by the Magistrate on the appellants failure to call expert evidence. In one sense that comment was justified but in a case of this kind between lawyer and client we think the matter cannot be left, where it is. In view of the fiduciary relation. ship between the parties it is as much necessary in the interest of, the prosecution as in. the interest of the accused that the whole matter should be cleared up, and no steps should be spared which might ensure complete justice between the parties. If it were an ordinary case between one litigant and another, we might have hesitated at this dis- tance of time to send the case back even though the prosecution did not avail of the opportunity of proving its own case. In all civilised countries, criminal jurisprudence has firmly established the rule that an accused person should not be placed on trial for the same offence more than once, except in very exceptional circumstances. In this case, the complainant had the fullest opportunity of adducing all the evidence that he was advised would be necessary to prove the charge against the accused person. It was not that he proved for the examination of an expert and that opportunity had been denied to him. The prosecution took its chance of having a decision in its favour on the evidence adduced by it before the trial Court.\nThat Court was not satisfied that evidence was adequately reliable to bring the charge home to the accused. The accused was thus acquitted.\nOn appeal, it was open to the High Court to take a different view of the evidence, if the facts and circumstances placed before it could lead to the conclusion that the appreciation of the evidence by the trial Court was so thoroughly erroneous as to be wholly unacceptable to the Appellate Court. If the High Court could come to the conclusion, it could have reversed the judgment and converted the order of acquittal into an order of conviction. But it should not have put the accused to the botheration and expense of a second trial simply because the prosecution did not adduce all the evidence that should, and could, have been brought before the Court of first instance. It is not a case where it in open to the Court of Appeal, against an order of acquittal, to order a retrial for the reasons that the trial Court has not given the prosecution full opportunity to adduce all available evidence in support of the prosecution case. It has no where been suggested that the trial Magistrate had unreasonably refused any opportunity to the prosecution to adduce all the evidence that it was ready and willing to produce.\nThat being so, the High Court, in our judgment, entirely misdirected itself in setting aside the order of acquittal and making an order for a fresh trial by another Magistrate, simply on the ground that the case was between a lawyer and his client. Simply because the accused happened to be a lawyer would not be a ground for subjecting him to harassment a second time, there being no reason for holding that his prosecutor had not a fair chance of bringing the charge home to him. In our opinion, the High Court gave way to considerations which were not relevant to a criminal trial. The High Court was not sitting on a disciplinary proceeding for professional misconduct. It had to apply the same rules of criminal jurisprudence as. apply to all criminal trials, and, in our opinion, the only. reason given by the High Court for ordering retrial is against all well-established rules of criminal jurisprudence. The fact that the appellant is a practising lawyer does not entitle him to any preferential treatment when he is hauled up on a criminal charge, even as he is not subject to any additional disability because the cam was between a lawyer and his client. There was no relationship of lawyer and client so far as the criminal case was concerned.", + "expert_2": "This appeal on a certificate of fitness granted by the High Court under Act 134(1), (c). of the Constitution, is directed against the order of a Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court dated December 21, 1960, setting aside the order of acquittal passed by the trial Magistrate, dated July 2, 1958.\nThe prosecution case was that the respondent had entrusted the. sum of Rs. 5000/- to the appellant for depositing in Court in connection with an application in respect of the proposed transaction, under the Bengal Money Lenders Act, and that the appellant having been so entrusted with the money, in breach of trust, misappropriated the amount, thus causing loss to his client. The appellant was, therefore, charged under s. 409 of the Indian Penal Code, with having committed criminal breach of trust in respect of the sum of Rs. 5000/- , which had been entrusted to him as a lawyer on behalf of the respondent. \nThe appellant defense was that the case, against him was false and that he had been falsely implicated for reasons which need not be stated.\na certain document, marketed Ex. 1, purporting to be a letter in the handwriting of the appellant, to show that Rs. 4200/- being a portion of the amount of Rs. 5000/- required for the deposit, had been asked for by the appellant. It also con- tained writings in the hand of the complainant owing that there was correspondence in the matter of the deposit. That was a very important piece of evidence, which if genuine could go a long way to prove the case against the appellant. But the appellant challenged the document as a forgery in material parts, and cross- examined the complainant who had produced the document.\nthe complainant did not take any steps to get an expert on handwriting examined.\nIt is true that expert evidence cannot always be a final settler still in a call of this kind, it is eminently desirable that the court should be assisted by a qualified expert since almost the whole case depends upon proof of the fact whether the impugned portions of that document were in the hand of the respondent Comment was also made by the Magistrate on the appellants failure to call expert evidence.\nthe complainant had the fullest opportunity of adducing all the evidence that he was advised would be necessary to prove the charge against the accused person. It was not that he proved for the examination of an expert and that opportunity had been denied to him.\nit was open to the High Court to take a different view of the evidence, if the facts and circumstances placed before it could lead to the conclusion that the appreciation of the evidence by the trial Court was so thoroughly erroneous as to be wholly unacceptable to the Appellate Court.\nIt has no where been suggested that the trial Magistrate had unreasonably refused any opportunity to the prosecution to adduce all the evidence that it was ready and willing to produce. That being so, the High Court, in our judgment, entirely misdirected itself in setting aside the order of acquittal and making an order for a fresh trial by another Magistrate, simply on the ground that the case was between a lawyer and his client.\nbecause the accused happened to be a lawyer would not be a ground for subjecting him to harassment a second time, there being no reason for holding that his prosecutor had not a fair chance of bringing the charge home to him. In our opinion, the High Court gave way to considerations which were not relevant to a criminal trial.", + "expert_3": "This appeal on a certificate of fitness granted by the High Court under Act 134(1), (c). of the Constitution, is directed against the order of a Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court dated December 21, 1960, setting aside the order of acquittal passed by the trial Magistrate, dated July 2, 1958. We heard this appeal on the eve of the long vacation and pronounced our order to the effect that the appeal was allowed and the order of acquittal was to stand, and that reasons would be given later\nIt appears that the appellant, who it a practising lawyer, had been employed by the respondent to work for him to investigate the title to some property which the latter was about to purchase, sometime in October 1952. The prosecution case was that the respondent had entrusted the. sum of Rs. 5000/- to the appellant for depositing in Court in connection with an application in respect of the proposed transaction, under the Bengal Money Lenders Act, and that the appellant having been so entrusted with the money, in breach of trust, misappropriated the amount, thus causing loss to his client. The appellant was, therefore, charged under s. 409 of the Indian Penal Code, with having committed criminal breach of trust in respect of the sum of Rs. 5000/- , which had been entrusted to him as a lawyer on behalf of the respondent\nThe appellant defense was that the case, against him was false and that he had been falsely implicated for reasons which need not be stated. In order to substantiate the charge against him, the complainant (now respondents examined himself and a number of witnesses\nHe also adduced in evidence a certain document, marketed Ex. 1, purporting to be a letter in the handwriting of the appellant, to show that Rs. 4200/- being a portion of the amount of Rs. 5000/- required for the deposit, had been asked for by the appellant. It also con- tained writings in the hand of the complainant owing that there was correspondence in the matter of the deposit. That was a very important piece of evidence, which if genuine could go a long way to prove the case against the appellant\nBut the appellant challenged the document as a forgery in material parts, and cross- examined the complainant who had produced the document. In spite of the fact that the complainant was very pointedly cross-examined with a view to showing that the document placed before the Court was a forgery in material parts, the complainant did not take any steps to get an expert on handwriting examined\nThe trial Court, on an examination of-the evidence, oral and documentary, came to the conclusion that the case against the accused had not been proved and acquitted him. The complainant preferred an appeal to the High Court against the order of acquittal, which was heard by a Division Bench, The High Court took the view that, in the circumstances of the case, there should be retrial by another magistrate, who should give an opportunity to the complainant to adduce the evidence of a handwriting expert in order to establish the genuineness of the questioned document. Apparently, the High court, sitting in appeal on the judgment of the acquittal, passed by the learned Magistrate, was not satisfied as to the genuineness of the questioned document\nOtherwise it could have pronounced its judgment one way or the other, on the merits of the controversy, whether or not the prosecution had succeeded in bringing the charge home to the accused. If it were not a case between a lawyer as an accused and his client as the complainant, perhaps the High Court may not have taken the unusual course of giving a fresh opportunity to the complainant to have second round of litigation, to the great prejudice of the accused.\nthe following observations of the High Court may be extracted in order to show the reasons.for the unusual course it took in this case Thus there can be no doubt that this was a document of considerable importance. According to the prosecution it clearly showed the respondents connection with the sum of Rs. 4200/- which was a part of the sum of Rs. 5000/-, the subject matter of the charge. According to the respondent, the figures 4200 and the Bengali word sankranta were for- geries just as at the bottom of the document the word yes and the signature of the res- pondent with date were also forgeries\nThis case was clearly put by the respondent to Bimla, Krishna Ben and it was suggested to him that the- impugned portions of the document were clear forgeries made by the appellant in order to falsely implicate the respondent\nIt must be said that inspite of this challenge, the appellant took no steps what. ever to produce expert evidence to aid the court in coming to a conclusion as to the authorship of the impugned portion of the document. It is true that expert evidence cannot always be a final settler still in a call of this kind, it is eminently desirable that the court should be assisted by a qualified expert since almost the whole case depends upon proof of the fact whether the impugned portions of that document were in the hand of the respondent Comment was also made by the Magistrate on the appellants failure to call expert evidence\nIn one sense that comment was justified but in a case of this kind between lawyer and client we think the matter cannot be left, where it is. In view of the fiduciary relation. ship between the parties it is as much necessary in the interest of, the prosecution as in. the interest of the accused that the whole matter should be cleared up, and no steps should be spared which might ensure complete justice between the parties. If it were an ordinary case between one litigant and another, we might have hesitated at this dis- tance of time to send the case back even though the prosecution did not avail of the opportunity of proving its own case.\nIn all civilised countries, criminal jurisprudence has firmly established the rule that an accused person should not be placed on trial for the same offence more than once, except in very exceptional circumstances\nIn this case, the complainant had the fullest opportunity of adducing all the evidence that he was advised would be necessary to prove the charge against the accused person. It was not that he proved for the examination of an expert and that opportunity had been denied to him. The prosecution took its chance of having a decision in its favour on the evidence adduced by it before the trial Court.\nThat Court was not satisfied that evidence was adequately reliable to bring the charge home to the accused.\nThe accused was thus acquitted\nOn appeal, it was open to the High Court to take a different view of the evidence, if the facts and circumstances placed before it could lead to the conclusion that the appreciation of the evidence by the trial Court was so thoroughly erroneous as to be wholly unacceptable to the Appellate Court. If the High Court could come to the conclusion, it could have reversed the judgment and converted the order of acquittal into an order of conviction. But it should not have put the accused to the botheration and expense of a second trial simply because the prosecution did not adduce all the evidence that should, and could, have been brought before the Court of first instance. It is not a case where it in open to the Court of Appeal, against an order of acquittal, to order a retrial for the reasons that the trial Court has not given the prosecution full opportunity to adduce all available evidence in support of the prosecution case\nIt has no where been suggested that the trial Magistrate had unreasonably refused any opportunity to the prosecution to adduce all the evidence that it was ready and willing to produce\nThat being so, the High Court, in our judgment, entirely misdirected itself in setting aside the order of acquittal and making an order for a fresh trial by another Magistrate, simply on the ground that the case was between a lawyer and his client. Simply because the accused happened to be a lawyer would not be a ground for subjecting him to harassment a second time, there being no reason for holding that his prosecutor had not a fair chance of bringing the charge home to him. In our opinion, the High Court gave way to considerations which were not relevant to a criminal trial.\nThe High Court was not sitting on a disciplinary proceeding for professional misconduct. It had to apply the same rules of criminal jurisprudence as. apply to all criminal trials, and, in our opinion, the only. reason given by the High Court for ordering retrial is against all well-established rules of criminal jurisprudence\nThe fact that the appellant is a practising lawyer does not entitle him to any preferential treatment when he is hauled up on a criminal charge, even as he is not subject to any additional disability because the cam was between a lawyer and his client. There was no relationship of lawyer and client so far as the criminal case was concerned.", + "expert_4": "This appeal on a certificate of fitness granted by the High Court under Act 134(1), (c). of the Constitution, is directed against the order of a Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court dated December 21, 1960, setting aside the order of acquittal passed by the trial Magistrate, dated July 2, 1958.\nWe heard this appeal on the eve of the long vacation and pronounced our order to the effect that the appeal was allowed and the order of acquittal was to stand, and that reasons would be given later.\nIt appears that the appellant, who it a practising lawyer, had been employed by the respondent to work for him to investigate the title to some property which the latter was about to purchase, sometime in October 1952.\nThe prosecution case was that the respondent had entrusted the. sum of Rs. 5000/- to the appellant for depositing in Court in connection with an application in respect of the proposed transaction, under the Bengal Money Lenders Act, and that the appellant having been so entrusted with the money, in breach of trust, misappropriated the amount, thus causing loss to his client.\nThe appellant was, therefore, charged under s. 409 of the Indian Penal Code, with having committed criminal breach of trust in respect of the sum of Rs. 5000/- , which had been entrusted to him as a lawyer on behalf of the respondent.\nThe appellant defense was that the case, against him was false and that he had been falsely implicated for reasons which need not be stated.\nIn order to substantiate the charge against him, the complainant (now respondents examined himself and a number of witnesses. He also adduced in evidence a certain document, marketed Ex. 1, purporting to be a letter in the handwriting of the appellant, to show that Rs. 4200/- being a portion of the amount of Rs. 5000/- required for the deposit, had been asked for by the appellant. It also con- tained writings in the hand of the complainant owing that there was correspondence in the matter of the deposit.\nThat was a very important piece of evidence, which if genuine could go a long way to prove the case against the appellant.\nBut the appellant challenged the document as a forgery in material parts, and cross- examined the complainant who had produced the document. In spite of the fact that the complainant was very pointedly cross-examined with a view to showing that the document placed before the Court was a forgery in material parts, the complainant did not take any steps to get an expert on handwriting examined.\nThe trial Court, on an examination of-the evidence, oral and documentary, came to the conclusion that the case against the accused had not been proved and acquitted him.\nThe complainant preferred an appeal to the High Court against the order of acquittal, which was heard by a Division Bench, The High Court took the view that, in the circumstances of the case, there should be retrial by another magistrate, who should give an opportunity to the complainant to adduce the evidence of a handwriting expert in order to establish the genuineness of the questioned document.\nApparently, the High court, sitting in appeal on the judgment of the acquittal, passed by the learned Magistrate, was not satisfied as to the genuineness of the questioned document.\nIn this connection, the following observations of the High Court may be extracted in order to show the reasons.for the unusual course it took in this case Thus there can be no doubt that this was a document of considerable importance. According to the prosecution it clearly showed the respondents connection with the sum of Rs. 4200/- which was a part of the sum of Rs. 5000/-, the subject matter of the charge. According to the respondent, the figures 4200 and the Bengali word sankranta were for- geries just as at the bottom of the document the word yes and the signature of the res- pondent with date were also forgeries.\nIt must be said that inspite of this challenge, the appellant took no steps what. ever to produce expert evidence to aid the court in coming to a conclusion as to the authorship of the impugned portion of the document.\nIt is true that expert evidence cannot always be a final settler still in a call of this kind, it is eminently desirable that the court should be assisted by a qualified expert since almost the whole case depends upon proof of the fact whether the impugned portions of that document were in the hand of the respondent Comment was also made by the Magistrate on the appellants failure to call expert evidence.\nIn one sense that comment was justified but in a case of this kind between lawyer and client we think the matter cannot be left, where it is.\nIn view of the fiduciary relation. ship between the parties it is as much necessary in the interest of, the prosecution as in. the interest of the accused that the whole matter should be cleared up, and no steps should be spared which might ensure complete justice between the parties.\nIf it were an ordinary case between one litigant and another, we might have hesitated at this dis- tance of time to send the case back even though the prosecution did not avail of the opportunity of proving its own case.\nIn all civilised countries, criminal jurisprudence has firmly established the rule that an accused person should not be placed on trial for the same offence more than once, except in very exceptional circumstances. In this case, the complainant had the fullest opportunity of adducing all the evidence that he was advised would be necessary to prove the charge against the accused person. It was not that he proved for the examination of an expert and that opportunity had been denied to him.\nThat Court was not satisfied that evidence was adequately reliable to bring the charge home to the accused. The accused was thus acquitted.\nOn appeal, it was open to the High Court to take a different view of the evidence, if the facts and circumstances placed before it could lead to the conclusion that the appreciation of the evidence by the trial Court was so thoroughly erroneous as to be wholly unacceptable to the Appellate Court. If the High Court could come to the conclusion, it could have reversed the judgment and converted the order of acquittal into an order of conviction.\nBut it should not have put the accused to the botheration and expense of a second trial simply because the prosecution did not adduce all the evidence that should, and could, have been brought before the Court of first instance. It is not a case where it in open to the Court of Appeal, against an order of acquittal, to order a retrial for the reasons that the trial Court has not given the prosecution full opportunity to adduce all available evidence in support of the prosecution case.\nIt has no where been suggested that the trial Magistrate had unreasonably refused any opportunity to the prosecution to adduce all the evidence that it was ready and willing to produce.\nThat being so, the High Court, in our judgment, entirely misdirected itself in setting aside the order of acquittal and making an order for a fresh trial by another Magistrate, simply on the ground that the case was between a lawyer and his client.\nSimply because the accused happened to be a lawyer would not be a ground for subjecting him to harassment a second time, there being no reason for holding that his prosecutor had not a fair chance of bringing the charge home to him. In our opinion, the High Court gave way to considerations which were not relevant to a criminal trial.\nThe High Court was not sitting on a disciplinary proceeding for professional misconduct. It had to apply the same rules of criminal jurisprudence as. apply to all criminal trials, and, in our opinion, the only. reason given by the High Court for ordering retrial is against all well-established rules of criminal jurisprudence.\nThe fact that the appellant is a practising lawyer does not entitle him to any preferential treatment when he is hauled up on a criminal charge, even as he is not subject to any additional disability because the cam was between a lawyer and his client. There was no relationship of lawyer and client so far as the criminal case was concerned.", + "expert_5": "That was a very important piece of evidence, which if genuine could go a long way to prove the case against the appellant.\nIn spite of the fact that the complainant was very pointedly cross-examined with a view to showing that the document placed before the Court was a forgery in material parts, the complainant did not take any steps to get an expert on handwriting examined.\nIf it were not a case between a lawyer as an accused and his client as the complainant, perhaps the High Court may not have taken the unusual course of giving a fresh opportunity to the complainant to have second round of litigation, to the great prejudice of the accused.\nIf it were an ordinary case between one litigant and another, we might have hesitated at this dis- tance of time to send the case back even though the prosecution did not avail of the opportunity of proving its own case.\nIn all civilised countries, criminal jurisprudence has firmly established the rule that an accused person should not be placed on trial for the same offence more than once, except in very exceptional circumstances.\nIn this case, the complainant had the fullest opportunity of adducing all the evidence that he was advised would be necessary to prove the charge against the accused person. It was not that he proved for the examination of an expert and that opportunity had been denied to him.\nThe prosecution took its chance of having a decision in its favour on the evidence adduced by it before the trial Court.\nThat Court was not satisfied that evidence was adequately reliable to bring the charge home to the accused. The accused was thus acquitted.\nOn appeal, it was open to the High Court to take a different view of the evidence, if the facts and circumstances placed before it could lead to the conclusion that the appreciation of the evidence by the trial Court was so thoroughly erroneous as to be wholly unacceptable to the Appellate Court. If the High Court could come to the conclusion, it could have reversed the judgment and converted the order of acquittal into an order of conviction.\nBut it should not have put the accused to the botheration and expense of a second trial simply because the prosecution did not adduce all the evidence that should, and could, have been brought before the Court of first instance.\nIt has no where been suggested that the trial Magistrate had unreasonably refused any opportunity to the prosecution to adduce all the evidence that it was ready and willing to produce.\nSimply because the accused happened to be a lawyer would not be a ground for subjecting him to harassment a second time, there being no reason for holding that his prosecutor had not a fair chance of bringing the charge home to him.\nThe High Court was not sitting on a disciplinary proceeding for professional misconduct. It had to apply the same rules of criminal jurisprudence as. apply to all criminal trials, and, in our opinion, the only. reason given by the High Court for ordering retrial is against all well-established rules of criminal jurisprudence.\nThe fact that the appellant is a practising lawyer does not entitle him to any preferential treatment when he is hauled up on a criminal charge, even as he is not subject to any additional disability because the cam was between a lawyer and his client." + }, + "1962_339": { + "expert_1": "Only one question arises for consideration in this appeal by special leave and that is the meaning to be given to the expression final decision occurring in the first proviso to s. 28 A of the Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 (Act No. 5 of 1920), introduced by Act No. 25 of 1948.\nThe appellants instituted a suit on February 1, 1.943, for the partition of the joint family property to which suit they made Pethi Reddy a party and claimed thereunder two- thirds share in the property puchased by him. In that suit it was contended on behalf of the respondent that on their fathers insolvency the share of the appellants in the joint family property also vested in the Official Receiver and that he had the power to sell it. The contention was negatived by the trial court which passed a preliminary decree for partition in favour of the appellants. \nThe decree was affirmed in appeal by the District judge and eventually by the High Court in second appeal, except with a slight variation regarding the amount of mesne profits. The decision of the High Court is dated November 18, 1946. On January 18, 1946 the appellants made an application for a final decree which was granted ex parte on August 17, 1946. At the instance of the present respondent this decree was set aside.\nBy that time the new provision, that is, s. 28 A of the Provincial, Insolvency Act, had come into force. On the basis of this provision it was contended by the respondent that the appellants were not entitled to the allotment of their two-thirds share in the property purchased by him inasmuch as that share had also vested in the Official Receiver. The District Munsif held that Act 25 of 1948 which introduced s. 28 A did not affect the preliminary decree for partition since it had been passed on August 20, 1943. He, therefore, restored the ex parte final decree which had been set aside on December 17, 1950. The appeal preferred by the respondent against the decision of the District Munsif was dismissed by the Principal Subordinate judge, Salem, whereupon he preferred a second appeal before the High Court. \nThe High Court allowed the appeal and dismissed the application of the appellant for passing the final decree,\nThe new provision makes it clear that the law is and has always been that upon the fathers insolvency his disposing power over the interest of his undivided sons in the joint family property vests in the Official Receiver and that consequently the latter has a right to sell that interest. The-provision is thus declaratory of the law and was intended to apply to all cases except those covered by the two provisos. We are concerned here only with the first proviso. This proviso excepts from the operation of the Act a transaction such as a sale by an Official Receiver which has been the subject of a final decision by a competent Court. The short question, therefore. is whether the preliminary decree for partition passed in this case which was affirmed finally in second \n I.L.R. 1943 Mad. 83. appeal by the High Court of Madras can be regard as a final decision. The competence of the court is not in question here.\nWhat is, however, contended is that in a partition suit the only decision which can be said to be a final decision is the final decree passed in the case and that since final decree proceedings were still going on when the Amending Act came into force the first proviso was not available to the appellants. It is contended on behalf of the appellants that since the rights of the parties are adjudicated upon by the court before a preliminary decree is passed that decree must, in so far as rights adjudicated upon arc concerned, be deemed to be a final decision The word decision even in its popular sense means a concluded opinion (see Strouds Judicial Dictionary--3rd ed. Vol. 1, p. 743). Where, therefore, the decision is embodied in the judgment which is followed by a decree finality must naturally attach itself to it in the sense that it is no longer open to question by either party except in an appeal, review or revision petition as provided for by law. The High Court has, however, observed The mere declaration of the rights of the plaintiff by the preliminary decree, would, in our opinion not amount to a final decision for it is well known that even if a preliminary decree is passed either in a mortgage suit or in a partition suit, there are certain contingencies in which such a preliminary decree can be modified or amended and therefore would not become final. It is not clear from the judgment what the contingencies referred to by the High Court are in which a preliminary decree can be modified or amended unless what the learned judges meant was modified or amended in appeal or in review or in revision or in exceptional circumstances by resorting to the powers conferred by ss. 151 and 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure. If that is what the High Court meant then every decree passed by a Court including decrees passed in cases which do not contemplate making of a preliminary decree are liable to be modified and amended. Therefore, if the reason given by the High Court is accepted it would mean that no finality attaches to decree at all. That is not the law. A decision is said to be final when so far as, ,the Court rendering it is concerned, it is unalterable except by resort to such provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure as permit its reversal, modification or amendment. Similarly, a final decision would mean a decision which would operate as res judicate between the parties if it is not sought to be modified or reversed by preferring an appeal or a revision or a review application as is permitted by the Code. A preliminary decree passed, whether it is in a mort- gage suit or a partition suit, is not a tentative decree but must, in so far as the matters dealt with by it are concerned, be regarded as conclusive. No doubt, in suits which contemplate the making of two decrees--a preliminary decree and a final decree-the decree which would be executable would be the final decree But the finality of a decree or a decision does not necessarily depend upon its being executable. The legislature in its wisdom has thought that suits of certain types should be decided in stages and though the suit in such cases can be regarded as fully and completely decided only after a final decree is made the decision of the court arrived at the earlier stage also has a finality attached to it.\nIt would be relevant to refer to s. 97 of the Code of Civil Procedure which provides that where a party aggrieved by a preliminary decree does not appeal from it, he is precluded from disputing its. correctness in any appeal which may be preferred from the final decree. This provision thus clearly indicates that as to the matters covered by it, a preliminary decree is regarded as embodying the final decision of the court pass- ing that decree.\nThe High Court, however, thinks that a decision cannot be regarded as final if further proceedings are required to be taken for procuring the relief to which a party is held entitled by that decision. In support of its view the High Court has referred to the following observations in in re A Debtor(1) It is clear., therefore, that further proceedings will be necessary to get the money out of court and I think it is also clear that the order of October 24, in its own terms, did not finally determine. the right of the petitioner, or any one else, in respect of the sum to be paid. In my opinion, therefore, the order is not a final order In that case the Divorce Court made an order that the co- respondent do within seven days from the service of this order pay into Court the sum of pound 67 Is. 9d. being the amount of the petitioners costs, as taxed and certified by one of the registrars of this Division.\nUpon the particular facts of the case the order was clearly not a final order and in making the observations quoted above the Master of Rolls did not formulate a test for determining what could be regarded as a final order in every kind of case. The observations of the Master of Rolls must be read in the context of the facts of the case decided by him. Read that way those observations do not help the respondents. Apart from this, the short answer to the reason given by the High Court is that even a money decree passed in a suit would cease to be a final decision because if the judgment- debtor against whom the decree is pawed does not pay the amount voluntarily execution proceedings will have to be taken for re- covering the amount from him. It would thus lead to an absurdity if the test adopted by the High Court is accepted.\nIn the case before us the preliminary decree was never challenged at all by preferring any appeal and therefore, the matters conclude by it are not open to challenge in an appeal against the final decree. Further, a preliminary decree cannot be equated with an interlocutory order within the meaning of s. 105, Code of Civil Procedure. It will thus be seen that the decision relied upon has no application to the facts of this case.\nOur conclusion, therefore, is that in this case the sale made by the Official Receiver during the insolvency of the appellants father was the subject of a final decision by a competent court inasmuch as that court decided that the sale was of no avail to the purchaser at the Official Receiver had no power to effect that sale. Nothing more was required to be established by the appellants before being entitled to the protection of the first proviso to s.28A. \nSince they have established what was required to be established by them, they are entitled to a final decree and the High Court was in error in dismissing their application in that behalf. In the result we allow the appeal, set aside the judgment and decree of the High Court and restore that of the trial court as affirmed in appeal by the learned Subordinate judge.", + "expert_2": "is the meaning to be given to the expression final decision occurring in the first proviso to s. 28 A of the Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 (Act No. 5 of 1920), introduced by Act No. 25 of 1948.\nVenkata Reddy, the father of the appellants, was adjudicated an insolvent\nAt that time only the appellants 1 and 2 were born while the third appellant was born later. The fathers one-third share was put up for auction by the Official Receiver and was purchased by one Karuppan Pillai for Rs. 80/-. The Official Receiver then put up for auction the two-thirds share belonging to appellants 1 and 2 on July 27, 1936, which was purchased by the same person for Rs. 341/-.\nIn that suit it was contended on behalf of the respondent that on their fathers insolvency the share of the appellants in the joint family property also vested in the Official Receiver and that he had the power to sell it. The contention was negatived by the trial court which passed a preliminary decree for partition in favour of the appellants.\nOn January 18, 1946 the appellants made an application for a final decree which was granted ex parte on August 17, 1946. At the instance of the present respondent this decree was set aside. By that time the new provision, that is, s. 28 A of the Provincial, Insolvency Act, had come into force. On the basis of this provision it was contended by the respondent that the appellants were not entitled to the allotment of their two-thirds share in the property purchased by him inasmuch as that share had also vested in the Official Receiver.\nAct 25 of 1948 which introduced s. 28 A did not affect the preliminary decree for partition since it had been passed on August 20, 1943. He, therefore, restored the ex parte final decree which had been set aside on December 17, 1950.\nThe objects and reasons set out in the bill which sought to introduce this provision were to bring the provisions of the provincial insolvency Act in line with those of the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act in so far as the vesting of the joint family property in the Official Receiver upon the fathers insolvency was concerned.\nThe new provision makes it clear that the law is and has always been that upon the fathers insolvency his disposing power over the interest of his undivided sons in the joint family property vests in the Official Receiver and that consequently the latter has a right to sell that interest. The-provision is thus declaratory of the law and was intended to apply to all cases except those covered by the two provisos.\nThis proviso excepts from the operation of the Act a transaction such as a sale by an Official Receiver which has been the subject of a final decision by a competent Court. The short question, therefore. is whether the preliminary decree for partition passed in this case which was affirmed finally in second \n I.L.R. 1943 Mad. 83. appeal by the High Court of Madras can be regard as a final decision.\nin a partition suit the only decision which can be said to be a final decision is the final decree passed in the case and that since final decree proceedings were still going on when the Amending Act came into force the first proviso was not available to the appellants.\nA decision is said to be final when so far as, ,the Court rendering it is concerned, it is unalterable except by resort to such provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure as permit its reversal, modification or amendment. Similarly, a final decision would mean a decision which would operate as res judicate between the parties if it is not sought to be modified or reversed by preferring an appeal or a revision or a review application as is permitted by the Code.\nA preliminary decree passed, whether it is in a mort- gage suit or a partition suit, is not a tentative decree but must, in so far as the matters dealt with by it are concerned, be regarded as conclusive.\nIt would be relevant to refer to s. 97 of the Code of Civil Procedure which provides that where a party aggrieved by a preliminary decree does not appeal from it, he is precluded from disputing its. correctness in any appeal which may be preferred from the final decree. This provision thus clearly indicates that as to the matters covered by it, a preliminary decree is regarded as embodying the final decision of the court pass- ing that decree.\nthe short answer to the reason given by the High Court is that even a money decree passed in a suit would cease to be a final decision because if the judgment- debtor against whom the decree is pawed does not pay the amount voluntarily execution proceedings will have to be taken for re- covering the amount from him. It would thus lead to an absurdity if the test adopted by the High Court is accepted.\nis that in this case the sale made by the Official Receiver during the insolvency of the appellants father was the subject of a final decision by a competent court inasmuch as that court decided that the sale was of no avail to the purchaser at the Official Receiver had no power to effect that sale. Nothing more was required to be established by the appellants before being entitled to the protection of the first proviso to s.28A.", + "expert_3": "Only one question arises for consideration in this appeal by special leave and that is the meaning to be given to the expression final decision occurring in the first proviso to s. 28 A of the Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 (Act No. 5 of 1920), introduced by Act No. 25 of 1948.\nVenkata Reddy, the father of the appellants, was adjudicated an insolvent by the Sub-Court, Salem in I. P. No. 73 of 1935\nThe fathers one-third share was put up for auction by the Official Receiver and was purchased by one Karuppan Pillai for Rs. 80/-.\nThe Official Receiver then put up for auction the two-thirds share belonging to appellants 1 and 2 on July 27, 1936, which was purchased by the same person for Rs. 341/-. He sold the entire property to the respondent Pethi Reddy on May 25, 1939, for Rs. 300\nThe appellants instituted a suit on February 1, 1.943, for the partition of the joint family property to which suit they made Pethi Reddy a party and claimed thereunder two- thirds share in the property puchased by him. In that suit it was contended on behalf of the respondent that on their fathers insolvency the share of the appellants in the joint family property also vested in the Official Receiver and that he had the power to sell it. The contention was negatived by the trial court which passed a preliminary decree for partition in favour of the appellants\nThe decree was affirmed in appeal by the District judge and eventually by the High Court in second appeal, except with a slight variation regarding the amount of mesne profits. The decision of the High Court is dated November 18, 1946.\nOn January 18, 1946 the appellants made an application for a final decree which was granted ex parte on August 17, 1946. At the instance of the present respondent this decree was set aside\nBy that time the new provision, that is, s. 28 A of the Provincial, Insolvency Act, had come into force. On the basis of this provision it was contended by the respondent that the appellants were not entitled to the allotment of their two-thirds share in the property purchased by him inasmuch as that share had also vested in the Official Receiver. The District Munsif held that Act 25 of 1948 which introduced s. 28 A did not affect the preliminary decree for partition since it had been passed on August 20, 1943.\nHe, therefore, restored the ex parte final decree which had been set aside on December 17, 1950. The appeal preferred by the respondent against the decision of the District Munsif was dismissed by the Principal Subordinate judge, Salem, whereupon he preferred a second appeal before the High Court\nThe High Court allowed the appeal and dismissed the application of the appellant for passing the final decree, Section 28A of the Provincial Insolvency Act runs as follows The property of the insolvent shall comprise and shall always be deemed to have comprised also the capacity to exercise and to take proceedings for exercising all such powers in or over or in respect of property as might have been exercised by the insolvent for his own benefit at the commencement of his insolvency or before his discharge Provided that nothing in this section shall affect any sale, mortgage or other transfer of the property of the insolvent by a Court or Receiver or the Collector acting tinder s. 60 made before the commencement of the Provincial Insolvency (Amendment) Act, 1948, which has been the subject of a final decision by a competent Court Provided further that the property of the insolvent shall not be deemed by reason of anything contained in this section to comprise his capacity referred to in this section in respect of any such sale, mortgage or other transfer of property made in the State of Madras after the 28th day of July, 1942. and before the commencement of the Provincial Insolvency (Amendment) Act, 1948.\nThe objects and reasons set out in the bill which sought to introduce this provision were to bring the provisions of the provincial insolvency Act in line with those of the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act in so far as the vesting of the joint family property in the Official Receiver upon the fathers insolvency was concerned. While under the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, in a case of this kind, the disposing power of the father over the interest of his undivided sons also vests in the Official Receiver and not merely the fathers own interest in the joint family property there was divergence of opinion amongst the High Courts in India as to whether under the Provincial Insolvency Act the fathers disposing power over his undivided sons interest also vests in the Official Receiver\nA Full Bench of the Madras High Court held in Ramasastrulu v. Balakrishna Rao (1) that it does not. It was in the light of this decision that in the appellants suit for partition, a preliminary decree was passed with respect to their two- thirds interest in the joint family property which had been sold by the Official Receiver\nIn the course of the decision of the Full Bench a suggestion was made that the legislature should step in and bring the provisions of the Provincial Insolvency Act in the relevant respect in line with those of the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act.\nThe new provision makes it clear that the law is and has always been that upon the fathers insolvency his disposing power over the interest of his undivided sons in the joint family property vests in the Official Receiver and that consequently the latter has a right to sell that interest. The-provision is thus declaratory of the law and was intended to apply to all cases except those covered by the two provisos\nthe first proviso. This proviso excepts from the operation of the Act a transaction such as a sale by an Official Receiver which has been the subject of a final decision by a competent Court.\nThe short question, therefore. is whether the preliminary decree for partition passed in this case which was affirmed finally in second \n I.L.R. 1943 Mad. 83. appeal by the High Court of Madras can be regard as a final decision\nWhere, therefore, the decision is embodied in the judgment which is followed by a decree finality must naturally attach itself to it in the sense that it is no longer open to question by either party except in an appeal, review or revision petition as provided for by law. The High Court has, however, observed The mere declaration of the rights of the plaintiff by the preliminary decree, would, in our opinion not amount to a final decision for it is well known that even if a preliminary decree is passed either in a mortgage suit or in a partition suit, there are certain contingencies in which such a preliminary decree can be modified or amended and therefore would not become final. It is not clear from the judgment what the contingencies referred to by the High Court are in which a preliminary decree can be modified or amended unless what the learned judges meant was modified or amended in appeal or in review or in revision or in exceptional circumstances by resorting to the powers conferred by ss. 151 and 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure. If that is what the High Court meant then every decree passed by a Court including decrees passed in cases which do not contemplate making of a preliminary decree are liable to be modified and amended. Therefore, if the reason given by the High Court is accepted it would mean that no finality attaches to decree at all\nThat is not the law. A decision is said to be final when so far as, ,the Court rendering it is concerned, it is unalterable except by resort to such provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure as permit its reversal, modification or amendment. Similarly, a final decision would mean a decision which would operate as res judicate between the parties if it is not sought to be modified or reversed by preferring an appeal or a revision or a review application as is permitted by the Code. A preliminary decree passed, whether it is in a mort- gage suit or a partition suit, is not a tentative decree but must, in so far as the matters dealt with by it are concerned, be regarded as conclusive. No doubt, in suits which contemplate the making of two decrees--a preliminary decree and a final decree-the decree which would be executable would be the final decree But the finality of a decree or a decision does not necessarily depend upon its being executable.\nThe legislature in its wisdom has thought that suits of certain types should be decided in stages and though the suit in such cases can be regarded as fully and completely decided only after a final decree is made the decision of the court arrived at the earlier stage also has a finality attached to it\nIt would be relevant to refer to s. 97 of the Code of Civil Procedure which provides that where a party aggrieved by a preliminary decree does not appeal from it, he is precluded from disputing its. correctness in any appeal which may be preferred from the final decree.\nThis provision thus clearly indicates that as to the matters covered by it, a preliminary decree is regarded as embodying the final decision of the court pass- ing that decree\nThe High Court, however, thinks that a decision cannot be regarded as final if further proceedings are required to be taken for procuring the relief to which a party is held entitled by that decision. In support of its view the High Court has referred to the following observations in in re A Debtor(1) It is clear., therefore, that further proceedings will be necessary to get the money out of court and I think it is also clear that the order of October 24, in its own terms, did not finally determine. the right of the petitioner, or any one else, in respect of the sum to be paid.\nmy opinion, therefore, the order is not a final order In that case the Divorce Court made an order that the co- respondent do within seven days from the service of this order pay into Court the sum of pound 67 Is. 9d. being the amount of the petitioners costs, as taxed and certified by one of the registrars of this Division. The order was made in that form because at that time the ultimate fate of the petition was undecided. No doubt, the decree nisi had been passed but it had yet to be made absolute land the right of the petitioner to receive the costs might never have been brought to fruition.\nThe money had therefore to be paid into the court\nA little latter a further order was made by the President of the Divorce Court in these terms Upon hearing the solicitors for the petitioner I do order that the order herein dated the 11th day of July 1928 be varied and that (the debtor) the co-respondent do within seven days from the service of this order pay to Messrs H. L. Lumley Co., of 35 Picadilly W. 1, the solicitors of the petitioner, the sum of pound 67 Is. 9d. being the amount of the petitioners taxed costs as taxed and certified by one of the (1)1929 2 Ch, 146. registrars of this Division, the said solicitors undertaking to lodge in Court any sums recovered under this order. Pursuant to this order the solicitors gave an undertaking required by the Court to the registrar on October 26\nOn November 5, the decree nisi was made absolute. On January 2, 1929, a bankruptcy notice was issued by the solicitors against the debtor, for payment to them of the amount of pound 67 1 s. 9d. The co-respondent did not comply with the bankruptcy notice and accordingly on January 27, the solicitors presented a bankruptcy petition against him\nOver-ruling the objection by the co-respondent, that is, the debtor that the bankruptcy notice was bad on, amongst other things, the ground that the second order made by the President of the Divorce Division was not a final order within sub-s. 1 (g) of s. 1 of the Bankruptcy Act, 1914, the registrar made a receiving order. In appeal it was contended that the receiving order was wrong because the solicitors were not the creditors of the debtor and also because the order for payment of the costs to them was not a final order\nWhile upholding the latter contention Lord Hanworth, M. R., said what has been quoted above and relied upon by the High Court. Upon the particular facts of the case the order was clearly not a final order and in making the observations quoted above the Master of Rolls did not formulate a test for determining what could be regarded as a final order in every kind of case\nThe observations of the Master of Rolls must be read in the context of the facts of the case decided by him. Read that way those observations do not help the respondents\nApart from this, the short answer to the reason given by the High Court is that even a money decree passed in a suit would cease to be a final decision because if the judgment- debtor against whom the decree is pawed does not pay the amount voluntarily execution proceedings will have to be taken for re- covering the amount from him. It would thus lead to an absurdity if the test adopted by the High Court is accepted.\nWe may, however, refer to a decision of this court upon which reliance was placed by the respondents. That is the decision in Vakalapudi Sri Ranga Rao and others V. Mutyala Ammanna\nThere, in a suit for partition and another suit for possession of the suit property and arrears of rent, it was contended that upon the fathers insolvency the Official Receiver was in- competent to sell the sons interest in the joint family property. The contention was negatived by the trial court but upheld in appeals by the Subordinate judge who remanded the suits to the trial court with certain directions. Appeals preferred against his decision were dismissed by the High Court. Before the decision of the suits after remand, the Amending Act, XXV of 1948 came into force and it was contended before the trial court that in view of the new provision the sale by the Official Receiver must be held to be good even so far as the sons interest was concerned. This contention was negatived by the trial court on the ground that the decision of the High Court on the point was a final order within the meaning of the proviso. \nThe District judge, before whom appeals were preferred, however, negatived the contention and held that there was no final order with regard to the sale by the Official Receiver. The High Court reversed the decision of the District judge but this Court held that the orders of remand made by the Subordinate Judge and upheld by the High Court were interlocutory orders as also were the orders of C.A.\nNo. 634 of 1957, decided on March 29, 1961. the High Court in the appeals prefer-red before it and as such could be challenged in the appeal preferred before this Court against the decision of the High Court in the appeal against the final decree in the suit.\nIn the case before us the preliminary decree was never challenged at all by preferring any appeal and therefore, the matters conclude by it are not open to challenge in an appeal against the final decree. Further, a preliminary decree cannot be equated with an interlocutory order within the meaning of s. 105, Code of Civil Procedure. It will thus be seen that the decision relied upon has no application to the facts of this case. Our conclusion, therefore, is that in this case the sale made by the Official Receiver during the insolvency of the appellants father was the subject of a final decision by a competent court inasmuch as that court decided that the sale was of no avail to the purchaser at the Official Receiver had no power to effect that sale\nNothing more was required to be established by the appellants before being entitled to the protection of the first proviso to s.28A\nSince they have established what was required to be established by them, they are entitled to a final decree and the High Court was in error in dismissing their application in that behalf", + "expert_4": "Only one question arises for consideration in this appeal by special leave and that is the meaning to be given to the expression final decision occurring in the first proviso to s. 28 A of the Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 (Act No. 5 of 1920), introduced by Act No. 25 of 1948.\nVenkata Reddy, the father of the appellants, was adjudicated an insolvent by the Sub-Court, Salem in I. P. No. 73 of 1935.\nAt that time only the appellants 1 and 2 were born while the third appellant was born later.\nThe fathers one-third share was put up for auction by the Official Receiver and was purchased by one Karuppan Pillai for Rs. 80/-. The Official Receiver then put up for auction the two-thirds share belonging to appellants 1 and 2 on July 27, 1936, which was purchased by the same person for Rs. 341/-. He sold the entire property to the respondent Pethi Reddy on May 25, 1939, for Rs. 300/-.\nThe appellants instituted a suit on February 1, 1.943, for the partition of the joint family property to which suit they made Pethi Reddy a party and claimed thereunder two- thirds share in the property puchased by him.\nIn that suit it was contended on behalf of the respondent that on their fathers insolvency the share of the appellants in the joint family property also vested in the Official Receiver and that he had the power to sell it. The contention was negatived by the trial court which passed a preliminary decree for partition in favour of the appellants. \nThe decree was affirmed in appeal by the District judge and eventually by the High Court in second appeal, except with a slight variation regarding the amount of mesne profits.\nOn January 18, 1946 the appellants made an application for a final decree which was granted ex parte on August 17, 1946.\nAt the instance of the present respondent this decree was set aside.\nBy that time the new provision, that is, s. 28 A of the Provincial, Insolvency Act, had come into force. On the basis of this provision it was contended by the respondent that the appellants were not entitled to the allotment of their two-thirds share in the property purchased by him inasmuch as that share had also vested in the Official Receiver. The District Munsif held that Act 25 of 1948 which introduced s. 28 A did not affect the preliminary decree for partition since it had been passed on August 20, 1943.\nHe, therefore, restored the ex parte final decree which had been set aside on December 17, 1950.\nThe appeal preferred by the respondent against the decision of the District Munsif was dismissed by the Principal Subordinate judge, Salem, whereupon he preferred a second appeal before the High Court. \nThe High Court allowed the appeal and dismissed the application of the appellant for passing the final decree\nSection 28A of the Provincial Insolvency Act runs as follows The property of the insolvent shall comprise and shall always be deemed to have comprised also the capacity to exercise and to take proceedings for exercising all such powers in or over or in respect of property as might have been exercised by the insolvent for his own benefit at the commencement of his insolvency or before his discharge Provided that nothing in this section shall affect any sale, mortgage or other transfer of the property of the insolvent by a Court or Receiver or the Collector acting tinder s. 60 made before the commencement of the Provincial Insolvency (Amendment) Act, 1948, which has been the subject of a final decision by a competent Court Provided further that the property of the insolvent shall not be deemed by reason of anything contained in this section to comprise his capacity referred to in this section in respect of any such sale, mortgage or other transfer of property made in the State of Madras after the 28th day of July, 1942. and before the commencement of the Provincial Insolvency (Amendment) Act, 1948.\nThe objects and reasons set out in the bill which sought to introduce this provision were to bring the provisions of the provincial insolvency Act in line with those of the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act in so far as the vesting of the joint family property in the Official Receiver upon the fathers insolvency was concerned.\nWhile under the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, in a case of this kind, the disposing power of the father over the interest of his undivided sons also vests in the Official Receiver and not merely the fathers own interest in the joint family property there was divergence of opinion amongst the High Courts in India as to whether under the Provincial Insolvency Act the fathers disposing power over his undivided sons interest also vests in the Official Receiver.\nA Full Bench of the Madras High Court held in Ramasastrulu v. Balakrishna Rao (1) that it does not. It was in the light of this decision that in the appellants suit for partition, a preliminary decree was passed with respect to their two- thirds interest in the joint family property which had been sold by the Official Receiver.\nIn the course of the decision of the Full Bench a suggestion was made that the legislature should step in and bring the provisions of the Provincial Insolvency Act in the relevant respect in line with those of the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act. The new provision makes it clear that the law is and has always been that upon the fathers insolvency his disposing power over the interest of his undivided sons in the joint family property vests in the Official Receiver and that consequently the latter has a right to sell that interest. The-provision is thus declaratory of the law and was intended to apply to all cases except those covered by the two provisos.\nWe are concerned here only with the first proviso.\nThis proviso excepts from the operation of the Act a transaction such as a sale by an Official Receiver which has been the subject of a final decision by a competent Court.\nThe short question, therefore. is whether the preliminary decree for partition passed in this case which was affirmed finally in second \n I.L.R. 1943 Mad. 83. appeal by the High Court of Madras can be regard as a final decision.\nThe competence of the court is not in question here. What is, however, contended is that in a partition suit the only decision which can be said to be a final decision is the final decree passed in the case and that since final decree proceedings were still going on when the Amending Act came into force the first proviso was not available to the appellants.\nIt is contended on behalf of the appellants that since the rights of the parties are adjudicated upon by the court before a preliminary decree is passed that decree must, in so far as rights adjudicated upon arc concerned, be deemed to be a final decision The word decision even in its popular sense means a concluded opinion (see Strouds Judicial Dictionary--3rd ed. Vol. 1, p. 743).\nWhere, therefore, the decision is embodied in the judgment which is followed by a decree finality must naturally attach itself to it in the sense that it is no longer open to question by either party except in an appeal, review or revision petition as provided for by law. The High Court has, however, observed The mere declaration of the rights of the plaintiff by the preliminary decree, would, in our opinion not amount to a final decision for it is well known that even if a preliminary decree is passed either in a mortgage suit or in a partition suit, there are certain contingencies in which such a preliminary decree can be modified or amended and therefore would not become final.\nIt is not clear from the judgment what the contingencies referred to by the High Court are in which a preliminary decree can be modified or amended unless what the learned judges meant was modified or amended in appeal or in review or in revision or in exceptional circumstances by resorting to the powers conferred by ss. 151 and 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure. If that is what the High Court meant then every decree passed by a Court including decrees passed in cases which do not contemplate making of a preliminary decree are liable to be modified and amended. Therefore, if the reason given by the High Court is accepted it would mean that no finality attaches to decree at all.\nThat is not the law.\nA decision is said to be final when so far as, ,the Court rendering it is concerned, it is unalterable except by resort to such provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure as permit its reversal, modification or amendment. Similarly, a final decision would mean a decision which would operate as res judicate between the parties if it is not sought to be modified or reversed by preferring an appeal or a revision or a review application as is permitted by the Code. A preliminary decree passed, whether it is in a mort- gage suit or a partition suit, is not a tentative decree but must, in so far as the matters dealt with by it are concerned, be regarded as conclusive.\nNo doubt, in suits which contemplate the making of two decrees--a preliminary decree and a final decree-the decree which would be executable would be the final decree But the finality of a decree or a decision does not necessarily depend upon its being executable.\nThe legislature in its wisdom has thought that suits of certain types should be decided in stages and though the suit in such cases can be regarded as fully and completely decided only after a final decree is made the decision of the court arrived at the earlier stage also has a finality attached to it.\nIt would be relevant to refer to s. 97 of the Code of Civil Procedure which provides that where a party aggrieved by a preliminary decree does not appeal from it, he is precluded from disputing its. correctness in any appeal which may be preferred from the final decree.\nThis provision thus clearly indicates that as to the matters covered by it, a preliminary decree is regarded as embodying the final decision of the court pass- ing that decree.\nThe High Court, however, thinks that a decision cannot be regarded as final if further proceedings are required to be taken for procuring the relief to which a party is held entitled by that decision. In support of its view the High Court has referred to the following observations in in re A Debtor(1) It is clear., therefore, that further proceedings will be necessary to get the money out of court and I think it is also clear that the order of October 24, in its own terms, did not finally determine. the right of the petitioner, or any one else, in respect of the sum to be paid. In my opinion, therefore, the order is not a final order In that case the Divorce Court made an order that the co- respondent do within seven days from the service of this order pay into Court the sum of pound 67 Is. 9d. being the amount of the petitioners costs, as taxed and certified by one of the registrars of this Division.\nThe order was made in that form because at that time the ultimate fate of the petition was undecided.\nNo doubt, the decree nisi had been passed but it had yet to be made absolute land the right of the petitioner to receive the costs might never have been brought to fruition. The money had therefore to be paid into the court. A little latter a further order was made by the President of the Divorce Court in these terms Upon hearing the solicitors for the petitioner I do order that the order herein dated the 11th day of July 1928 be varied and that (the debtor) the co-respondent do within seven days from the service of this order pay to Messrs H.\nL.\nLumley Co., of 35 Picadilly W. 1, the solicitors of the petitioner, the sum of pound 67 Is. 9d. being the amount of the petitioners taxed costs as taxed and certified by one of the (1)1929 2 Ch, 146. registrars of this Division, the said solicitors undertaking to lodge in Court any sums recovered under this order. Pursuant to this order the solicitors gave an undertaking required by the Court to the registrar on October 26. On November 5, the decree nisi was made absolute.\nOn January 2, 1929, a bankruptcy notice was issued by the solicitors against the debtor, for payment to them of the amount of pound 67 1 s. 9d.\nThe co-respondent did not comply with the bankruptcy notice and accordingly on January 27, the solicitors presented a bankruptcy petition against him. Over-ruling the objection by the co-respondent, that is, the debtor that the bankruptcy notice was bad on, amongst other things, the ground that the second order made by the President of the Divorce Division was not a final order within sub-s. 1 (g) of s. 1 of the Bankruptcy Act, 1914, the registrar made a receiving order. In appeal it was contended that the receiving order was wrong because the solicitors were not the creditors of the debtor and also because the order for payment of the costs to them was not a final order.\nUpon the particular facts of the case the order was clearly not a final order and in making the observations quoted above the Master of Rolls did not formulate a test for determining what could be regarded as a final order in every kind of case. The observations of the Master of Rolls must be read in the context of the facts of the case decided by him.\nRead that way those observations do not help the respondents.\nApart from this, the short answer to the reason given by the High Court is that even a money decree passed in a suit would cease to be a final decision because if the judgment- debtor against whom the decree is pawed does not pay the amount voluntarily execution proceedings will have to be taken for re- covering the amount from him. It would thus lead to an absurdity if the test adopted by the High Court is accepted.\nin Vakalapudi Sri Ranga Rao and others V. Mutyala Ammanna (1) in which it was held that a particular order was not a final decision within the meaning of the first proviso to S. 28-A.\nBefore the decision of the suits after remand, the Amending Act, XXV of 1948 came into force and it was contended before the trial court that in view of the new provision the sale by the Official Receiver must be held to be good even so far as the sons interest was concerned. This contention was negatived by the trial court on the ground that the decision of the High Court on the point was a final order within the meaning of the proviso. \nThe District judge, before whom appeals were preferred, however, negatived the contention and held that there was no final order with regard to the sale by the Official Receiver.\nThe High Court reversed the decision of the District judge but this Court held that the orders of remand made by the Subordinate Judge and upheld by the High Court were interlocutory orders as also were the orders of C.A. No. 634 of 1957, decided on March 29, 1961. the High Court in the appeals prefer-red before it and as such could be challenged in the appeal preferred before this Court against the decision of the High Court in the appeal against the final decree in the suit.\nIn the case before us the preliminary decree was never challenged at all by preferring any appeal and therefore, the matters conclude by it are not open to challenge in an appeal against the final decree.\nFurther, a preliminary decree cannot be equated with an interlocutory order within the meaning of s. 105, Code of Civil Procedure.\nIt will thus be seen that the decision relied upon has no application to the facts of this case.\nOur conclusion, therefore, is that in this case the sale made by the Official Receiver during the insolvency of the appellants father was the subject of a final decision by a competent court inasmuch as that court decided that the sale was of no avail to the purchaser at the Official Receiver had no power to effect that sale.\nNothing more was required to be established by the appellants before being entitled to the protection of the first proviso to s.28A. \nSince they have established what was required to be established by them, they are entitled to a final decree and the High Court was in error in dismissing their application in that behalf. In the result we allow the appeal, set aside the judgment and decree of the High Court and restore that of the trial court as affirmed in appeal by the learned Subordinate judge.", + "expert_5": "The property of the insolvent shall comprise and shall always be deemed to have comprised also the capacity to exercise and to take proceedings for exercising all such powers in or over or in respect of property as might have been exercised by the insolvent for his own benefit at the commencement of his insolvency or before his discharge\nProvided that nothing in this section shall affect any sale, mortgage or other transfer of the property of the insolvent by a Court or Receiver or the Collector acting tinder s. 60 made before the commencement of the Provincial Insolvency (Amendment) Act, 1948, which has been the subject of a final decision by a competent Court Provided further that the property of the insolvent shall not be deemed by reason of anything contained in this section to comprise his capacity referred to in this section in respect of any such sale, mortgage or other transfer of property made in the State of Madras after the 28th day of July, 1942. and before the commencement of the Provincial Insolvency (Amendment) Act, 1948.\nThe word decision even in its popular sense means a concluded opinion (see Strouds Judicial Dictionary--3rd ed. Vol. 1, p. 743).\nWhere, therefore, the decision is embodied in the judgment which is followed by a decree finality must naturally attach itself to it in the sense that it is no longer open to question by either party except in an appeal, review or revision petition as provided for by law.\nIt is not clear from the judgment what the contingencies referred to by the High Court are in which a preliminary decree can be modified or amended unless what the learned judges meant was modified or amended in appeal or in review or in revision or in exceptional circumstances by resorting to the powers conferred by ss. 151 and 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure.\nA decision is said to be final when so far as, ,the Court rendering it is concerned, it is unalterable except by resort to such provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure as permit its reversal, modification or amendment.\nSimilarly, a final decision would mean a decision which would operate as res judicate between the parties if it is not sought to be modified or reversed by preferring an appeal or a revision or a review application as is permitted by the Code.\nA preliminary decree passed, whether it is in a mort- gage suit or a partition suit, is not a tentative decree but must, in so far as the matters dealt with by it are concerned, be regarded as conclusive.\nthe finality of a decree or a decision does not necessarily depend upon its being executable.\nThe legislature in its wisdom has thought that suits of certain types should be decided in stages and though the suit in such cases can be regarded as fully and completely decided only after a final decree is made the decision of the court arrived at the earlier stage also has a finality attached to it.\nIt would be relevant to refer to s. 97 of the Code of Civil Procedure which provides that where a party aggrieved by a preliminary decree does not appeal from it, he is precluded from disputing its. correctness in any appeal which may be preferred from the final decree. This provision thus clearly indicates that as to the matters covered by it, a preliminary decree is regarded as embodying the final decision of the court pass- ing that decree.\nUpon the particular facts of the case the order was clearly not a final order and in making the observations quoted above the Master of Rolls did not formulate a test for determining what could be regarded as a final order in every kind of case.\nThe observations of the Master of Rolls must be read in the context of the facts of the case decided by him. Read that way those observations do not help the respondents.\nApart from this, the short answer to the reason given by the High Court is that even a money decree passed in a suit would cease to be a final decision because if the judgment- debtor against whom the decree is pawed does not pay the amount voluntarily execution proceedings will have to be taken for re- covering the amount from him. It would thus lead to an absurdity if the test adopted by the High Court is accepted.\nIn the case before us the preliminary decree was never challenged at all by preferring any appeal and therefore, the matters conclude by it are not open to challenge in an appeal against the final decree.\nFurther, a preliminary decree cannot be equated with an interlocutory order within the meaning of s. 105, Code of Civil Procedure.\nin this case the sale made by the Official Receiver during the insolvency of the appellants father was the subject of a final decision by a competent court inasmuch as that court decided that the sale was of no avail to the purchaser at the Official Receiver had no power to effect that sale.\nSince they have established what was required to be established by them, they are entitled to a final decree and the High Court was in error in dismissing their application in that behalf." + }, + "1962_384": { + "expert_1": "This appeal by special leave, is directed against the order passed by the Industrial Tribunal,Patna, directing the appellant, the Tatanagar Foundry Co., to pay to the respondents, its workmen, 75 of the consolidated wages as compensation for having laid them off for a period of 45 days commencing from December 1.5, 1959. it is common around that the appellant laid off the respondents for the said period. The appellants case was that it had paid the respondents the statutory compensation for the said lay-off as prescribed by s.25C of the Industrial Disputes Act (No. 14 of 1947) (hereinafter called the Act). \nThe respondents, however, contended that the lay-off was not justified and so the statutory compensation paid by the appellant did not satisfy the ends of justice. It was this dispute between the parties which was referred for adjudication by the Government of Bihar to the Industrial Tribunal on February 9, 1960. On this reference, the Tribunal has held that the lay-off could not be held to be altogether justified. That is why it has awarded compensation to the respondents in excess of the amount statutorily fixed in that behalf. The appellant contends that the award thus made by the Tribunal is contrary to law Before dealing with the merits of the contentions raised by the appellant, it would be necessary to state some relevant facts which led to the lay-off.\nIt appears that before the Tribunal it was urged by the respondents that the appellant had deliberately brought about a situation which led to the lay-off in order to divert the relevant orders for sleepers to its Belur factory. The argument was that at Belur, the appellant gets its work done at cheaper cost with the help of contract labour. Now, if this contention had been established then it would clearly have been a case of malafides on the part of the appellant and a claim for additional compensation may have been justified. But the Tribunal has rejected this contention and has hold that no evidence had been adduced to prove such a malafide intention on the part of the appellant. It was also urged by the respondents that even in the absence of pig iron, the manufacture of sleepers could have been carried on by utilising a substitute, and in support of this case, four witnesses were examined by the respondents. The Tribunal has rejected this case also. It has found that the evidence given by the four witnesses was unreliable and unsatisfactory and the statement made by the General Manager in cross-examination on this point was sufficient to show that in the absence of pig iron, castings with scrap iron and tin could not have been made.\nIt appears that before the Tribunal it was urged by the respondents that the appellant had deliberately brought about a situation which led to the lay-off in order to divert the relevant orders for sleepers to its Belur factory. The argument was that at Belur, the appellant gets its work done at cheaper cost with the help of contract labour. Now, if this contention had been established then it would clearly have been a case of malafides on the part of the appellant and a claim for additional compensation may have been justified. But the Tribunal has rejected this contention and has hold that no evidence had been adduced to prove such a malafide intention on the part of the appellant. It was also urged by the respondents that even in the absence of pig iron, the manufacture of sleepers could have been carried on by utilising a substitute, and in support of this case, four witnesses were examined by the respondents.\nIn fact, the General Manager categorically stated that the appellant had not casted any sleeper without pig iron at any time. Thus, the alternative plea raised by the respondents to suggest that if the appellant had so desired, it could have avoided to lay-off its workmen, has also been rejected by the Tribunal. The Tribunal, however, was inclined to take the view that if the management had been more foresighted, it could have avoided the unfortunate position which it had to face at the relevant time and because the Tribunal thought that the situation which faced the appellant at the relevant time was partly due to its negligence, it reached the final conclusion that the lay-off was not altogether justified. The Tribunals view appears to be that if reasonable care had been exercised by the appellant, the situation could have been avoided. It is this part, of its finding that is seriously disputed before us by the appellant.\nAs we have already seen, there is no doubt that raw materials wore not available to the appellant at the relevant time and so, the lay-off which is the subject-matter of the present dispute satisfies the test prescribed by the definition.\nIn other words, the reference shows that it was only if the Tribunal came to the conclusion that the lay-off wag not justified that the question of considering what additional compensation should be paid to the respondents could arise. If the lay-off is justified and it satisfies the requirements of the definition under s. 2(kkk), the only relief to which the workmen laid off are entitled is the statutory relief prescribed by a. 25C. There is no doubt or dispute about this position. It is also not in dispute that if the lay-off is malafide in the sense that the employer has deliberately and maliciously brought about a situation where lay off became necessary, then it would not be a lay-off which is justified under s. 2(kkk) and the relief provided to the laid-off workmen under a. 25C would not be the only relief to which they are entitled. Malafides of the employer in declaring a lay-off really mean that no lay-off, as contemplated by the definition, has in law taken place and so, a finding as to malafides of the employer in declaring a lay-off naturally takes the lay-off out of the definition of s. 2(kkk) and as such a. 25C cannot be held to be applicable to it so as to confine the workmens right to the compensation therein prescribed. If the lay-off has been declared in order to victimise the workmen or for some other ulterior purpose, the position would be the same. It would Dot be a lay-off as contemplated by a. 2(kkk). But when dealing with a lay-off like the one with which we are concerned in the present appeal it would not be open to the Tribunal to enquire whether the appellant could have avoided the lay off if he had been more diligent, more careful or more far-sighted. That is a matter relating to the management of the undertaking and unless malafides are alleged or proved, it would be difficult to assume that the Industrial Tribunal has jurisdiction to sit in judgment over the acts of management of the employer and investigate whether a more prudent management could have avoided the situation which led to lay- off. The danger involved in permitting such jurisdiction to the Tribunal is illustrated by the present award itself.\nThe Tribunal has found that the appellant was in financial difficulties at the relevant time it has found that the appellant was not actuated by any malafide intention, it has come to the conclusion that the lay-off was not the result of any uleriort motive, and yet it has finally come to the conclusion that if the affairs of the appellant it had been better managed and more foresight had been shown by the appellant prior to the time when the crisis was reached, pig iron could have been secured and lay-off could have been avoided. Apart from, the fact that this conclusion does not appear to be borne out by any evidence on record, it seems to us that the Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction in trying to decide whether better. management could have avoided the crisis. The appellant is, no doubt, expected to manage its affairs prudently, but it would, we think, not be reasonable or fair to hold that if the employer is faced with a situation under which for lack of raw materials he has to lay-off his workmen, it is necessary that he must submit to an enquiry by the Industrial Tribunal about the prudence of the management and the forethought displayed by it in anticipating and avoiding the difficulties. \nThat is why we think in embarking upon an enquiry as to whether the appellant had shown sufficient foresight in managing its affairs, the Tribunal has exceeded its jurisdiction. Besides, as we have just indicated, its finding on the question of negligence is not supported by any evidence on record nor by probabilities in the case. In that connection, it is significant that subsequently the section in question has been closed and the retrenched workmen have been paid retrenchment compensation due to them.", + "expert_2": "The appellants case was that it had paid the respondents the statutory compensation for the said lay-off as prescribed by s.25C of the Industrial Disputes Act (No. 14 of 1947) (hereinafter called the Act). \nThe respondents, however, contended that the lay-off was not justified and so the statutory compensation paid by the appellant did not satisfy the ends of justice.\nthe situation did not show any signs of improvement and the appellant found that no raw material was available with which its foundry could carry on the manufacture of sleepers, it issued a notice on December 15,- 1959, and laid off the workers of the Sleeper Factory.\nretrenchment compensation was duly paid to the workmen who had been retrenched.\nthe alternative plea raised by the respondents to suggest that if the appellant had so desired, it could have avoided to lay-off its workmen, has also been rejected by the Tribunal.\nThe Tribunal, however, was inclined to take the view that if the management had been more foresighted, it could have avoided the unfortunate position which it had to face at the relevant time and because the Tribunal thought that the situation which faced the appellant at the relevant time was partly due to its negligence, it reached the final conclusion that the lay-off was not altogether justified.\nIf the lay-off is justified and it satisfies the requirements of the definition under s. 2(kkk), the only relief to which the workmen laid off are entitled is the statutory relief prescribed by a. 25C.\nif the lay-off is malafide in the sense that the employer has deliberately and maliciously brought about a situation where lay off became necessary, then it would not be a lay-off which is justified under s. 2(kkk) and the relief provided to the laid-off workmen under a. 25C would not be the only relief to which they are entitled.\nwhen dealing with a lay-off like the one with which we are concerned in the present appeal it would not be open to the Tribunal to enquire whether the appellant could have avoided the lay off if he had been more diligent, more careful or more far-sighted.\nthe fact that this conclusion does not appear to be borne out by any evidence on record, it seems to us that the Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction in trying to decide whether better. management could have avoided the crisis.", + "expert_3": "This appeal by special leave, is directed against the order passed by the Industrial Tribunal,Patna, directing the appellant, the Tatanagar Foundry Co., to pay to the respondents, its workmen, 75 of the consolidated wages as compensation for having laid them off for a period of 45 days commencing from December 1.5, 1959. it is common around that the appellant laid off the respondents for the said period.\nThe appellants case was that it had paid the respondents the statutory compensation for the said lay-off as prescribed by s.25C of the Industrial Disputes Act (No. 14 of 1947) (hereinafter called the Act). \nThe respondents, however, contended that the lay-off was not justified and so the statutory compensation paid by the appellant did not satisfy the ends of justice\nIt was this dispute between the parties which was referred for adjudication by the Government of Bihar to the Industrial Tribunal on February 9, 1960. On this reference, the Tribunal has held that the lay-off could not be held to be altogether justified. That is why it has awarded compensation to the respondents in excess of the amount statutorily fixed in that behalf\nThe appellant contends that the award thus made by the Tribunal is contrary to law Before dealing with the merits of the contentions raised by the appellant, it would be necessary to state some relevant facts which led to the lay-off.\nThe appellant is a Public Limited Company and has its factory in Jamshedpur. \nIt manufactures cast iron sleepers, pipes, general engineering casting and non-ferrous castings in the said factory. The raw materials mainly required for the manufacture of sleepers are pig-iron, coke, limestone and moulding sand. The Railway Board is the only buyer of sleepers and the sleepers are, therefore, manufactured only on receipt of orders upon tenders from the said Board, and not otherwise\nThe normal procedure for procuring raw material was that after an order was received from the Railway Board, the appellant submitted its requirement of pig iron to ,the Iron Steel Controller of the Government of India who allocates the quantity for the said commodity to the various manufactures, such as Tata Iron Steel Co\nLtd. and Indian Iron Steel Co. Ltd. Formerly, supply of pig iron used to come from the said two concerns to the appellant and the appellant used to pay cash to Tata Iron Steel Co. Ltd. for the pig iron supplied by it and by a Letter of credit to the Indian Iron Steel Co\nLtd. on which the said Company used to supply the raw material made by it\nIn 1959, both the companies stopped supply of pig iron in spite of the order issued in that behalf by the Controller, and they wrote to the appellant suggesting that the appellant should request the Controller to cancel his order and place the same with some other suppliers. Correspondence followed between the said companies and the appellant and finally in November, 1959, the appellant was informed by the said companies that they could not supply its requirements of raw material. In June, 1959, the Bhilai Steel Works made their first shipment of pig iron addressed to, the appellant. In August, 1959, the said Works despatched some wagons of pig iron to the appellant, but out of 20 wagons of the consignment, 14 were lost completely, and the rest misdelivered and were subsequently found somewhere in Gomoh and some in Tatanagar and they never reached the appellant in time\nIn May, 1959, the appellant arranged for Letter of Credit for a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- for the Bhilai Steel Works\nIn August, there was a supply of 440 tons and in September, followed a supply of 36 wagons Containing pig iron to the extent of 20 to 21 tons each roughly. In all, this latter supply came to about 760 tons. \nIn the two subsequent months, no supply was received from Bhilai.\nThe Letter of Credit which the appellant had opened for Bhilai Steel Works was revolving, with the result that as soon as one transaction was completed, the said letter was ready for the subsequent transaction. The effect of this revolving letter was that the value of credit of Rs.1,00,000/- continued to be outstanding all the time\nIn spite of this revolving letter, the Bhilai Steel Works failed to supply pig iron in the two months October and November. The appellant reminded the Works that no supply of pig iron was received from them and yet no advice of any despatch of pig iron was received from the Works after July 27, 1959. Even the 20 wagons which had been sent in August and September did not arrive at the factory\nThese wagons, it was later learnt, had been delivered to K. P. Docks and some other destinations.\nIn regard to the supply of pig iron from Rourkela, the appellant arranged for finance on cash basis. In fact, between August and December a total advance of Rs. 1,75,000/- was made to the Rourkela Steel Works. A supply of pig iron worth about Rs. 1,64,000/- was received by the appellant, but the balance of Rs. 11,000/- was still outstanding.,In addition to the cash advances, the appellant also opened a Letter of Credit for Rs. 1,00,000/- in November, 1959, for financing the purchase of steel from the said Works\nAs early as 1959, TISCO informed the appellant that it regretted that it would not be possible for it to supply the requirements of the company regularly, while in regard to the supply from IISCO, the position was still worse\nThe appellant kept its employees and the Assistant Labour Commissioner fully informed of these unfortunate developments from time to time. Both the Assistant Labour Commissioner and Mr. John, President of the respondents Union, did what they could by moving the Government to assist the appellant in securing the raw material. Even so, when the situation did not show any signs of improvement and the appellant found that no raw material was available with which its foundry could carry on the manufacture of sleepers, it issued a notice on December 15,- 1959, and laid off the workers of the Sleeper Factory.\nThis lay-off con- tinued until September, 11, 1960 and from September 12, 1960, the appellant closed the Sleeper Foundry department and issued notice of retrenchment\nSubsequently, retrenchment compensation was duly paid to the workmen who had been retrenched\nIt appears that before the Tribunal it was urged by the respondents that the appellant had deliberately brought about a situation which led to the lay-off in order to divert the relevant orders for sleepers to its Belur factory. The argument was that at Belur, the appellant gets its work done at cheaper cost with the help of contract labour.\nNow, if this contention had been established then it would clearly have been a case of malafides on the part of the appellant and a claim for additional compensation may have been justified. But the Tribunal has rejected this contention and has hold that no evidence had been adduced to prove such a malafide intention on the part of the appellant\nIt was also urged by the respondents that even in the absence of pig iron, the manufacture of sleepers could have been carried on by utilising a substitute, and in support of this case, four witnesses were examined by the respondents. The Tribunal has rejected this case also. It has found that the evidence given by the four witnesses was unreliable and unsatisfactory and the statement made by the General Manager in cross-examination on this point was sufficient to show that in the absence of pig iron, castings with scrap iron and tin could not have been made.\nIn fact, the General Manager categorically stated that the appellant had not casted any sleeper without pig iron at any time. Thus, the alternative plea raised by the respondents to suggest that if the appellant had so desired, it could have avoided to lay-off its workmen, has also been rejected by the Tribunal\nThe Tribunal, however, was inclined to take the view that if the management had been more foresighted, it could have avoided the unfortunate position which it had to face at the relevant time and because the Tribunal thought that the situation which faced the appellant at the relevant time was partly due to its negligence, it reached the final conclusion that the lay-off was not altogether justified. The Tribunals view appears to be that if reasonable care had been exercised by the appellant, the situation could have been avoided. It is this part, of its finding that is seriously disputed before us by the appellant\nUnder a. 2 (kkk), lay-off means, inter alia, the failure, or inability of an employer on account of shortage of raw materials to give employment to a workman whose name is borne on the muster rolls of his industrial establishment and who has not been retrenched\nAs we have already seen, there is no doubt that raw materials wore not available to the appellant at the relevant time and so, the lay-off which is the subject-matter of the present dispute satisfies the test prescribed by the definition. Section 25C provides for the right of workmen laid-off for compensation, and it is common ground that compensation, equal to 50 of the total of the basic wages and dearness allowance, as therein prescribed has been paid by the appellant to the respondents\nThe issue referred to the Tribunal was whether the action of the management in laying off the workmen was justified. If not, to what relief were, the respondents entitled ? In other words, the reference shows that it was only if the Tribunal came to the conclusion that the lay-off wag not justified that the question of considering what additional compensation should be paid to the respondents could arise\nIf the lay-off is justified and it satisfies the requirements of the definition under s. 2(kkk), the only relief to which the workmen laid off are entitled is the statutory relief prescribed by a. 25C. There is no doubt or dispute about this position\nIt is also not in dispute that if the lay-off is malafide in the sense that the employer has deliberately and maliciously brought about a situation where lay off became necessary, then it would not be a lay-off which is justified under s. 2(kkk) and the relief provided to the laid-off workmen under a. 25C would not be the only relief to which they are entitled. Malafides of the employer in declaring a lay-off really mean that no lay-off, as contemplated by the definition, has in law taken place and so, a finding as to malafides of the employer in declaring a lay-off naturally takes the lay-off out of the definition of s. 2(kkk) and as such a. 25C cannot be held to be applicable to it so as to confine the workmens right to the compensation therein prescribed. If the lay-off has been declared in order to victimise the workmen or for some other ulterior purpose, the position would be the same\nIt would Dot be a lay-off as contemplated by a. 2(kkk).\nBut when dealing with a lay-off like the one with which we are concerned in the present appeal it would not be open to the Tribunal to enquire whether the appellant could have avoided the lay off if he had been more diligent, more careful or more far-sighted. That is a matter relating to the management of the undertaking and unless malafides are alleged or proved, it would be difficult to assume that the Industrial Tribunal has jurisdiction to sit in judgment over the acts of management of the employer and investigate whether a more prudent management could have avoided the situation which led to lay- off. The danger involved in permitting such jurisdiction to the Tribunal is illustrated by the present award itself\nThe Tribunal has found that the appellant was in financial difficulties at the relevant time it has found that the appellant was not actuated by any malafide intention, it has come to the conclusion that the lay-off was not the result of any uleriort motive, and yet it has finally come to the conclusion that if the affairs of the appellant it had been better managed and more foresight had been shown by the appellant prior to the time when the crisis was reached, pig iron could have been secured and lay-off could have been avoided.\nApart from, the fact that this conclusion does not appear to be borne out by any evidence on record, it seems to us that the Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction in trying to decide whether better. management could have avoided the crisis. The appellant is, no doubt, expected to manage its affairs prudently, but it would, we think, not be reasonable or fair to hold that if the employer is faced with a situation under which for lack of raw materials he has to lay-off his workmen, it is necessary that he must submit to an enquiry by the Industrial Tribunal about the prudence of the management and the forethought displayed by it in anticipating and avoiding the difficulties. \nThat is why we think in embarking upon an enquiry as to whether the appellant had shown sufficient foresight in managing its affairs, the Tribunal has exceeded its jurisdiction. Besides, as we have just indicated, its finding on the question of negligence is not supported by any evidence on record nor by probabilities in the case.\nIn that connection, it is significant that subsequently the section in question has been closed and the retrenched workmen have been paid retrenchment compensation due to them.", + "expert_4": "This appeal by special leave, is directed against the order passed by the Industrial Tribunal,Patna, directing the appellant, the Tatanagar Foundry Co., to pay to the respondents, its workmen, 75 of the consolidated wages as compensation for having laid them off for a period of 45 days commencing from December 1.5, 1959. it is common around that the appellant laid off the respondents for the said period. The appellants case was that it had paid the respondents the statutory compensation for the said lay-off as prescribed by s.25C of the Industrial Disputes Act (No. 14 of 1947) (hereinafter called the Act). \nThe respondents, however, contended that the lay-off was not justified and so the statutory compensation paid by the appellant did not satisfy the ends of justice. It was this dispute between the parties which was referred for adjudication by the Government of Bihar to the Industrial Tribunal on February 9, 1960. On this reference, the Tribunal has held that the lay-off could not be held to be altogether justified. That is why it has awarded compensation to the respondents in excess of the amount statutorily fixed in that behalf. The appellant contends that the award thus made by the Tribunal is contrary to law Before dealing with the merits of the contentions raised by the appellant, it would be necessary to state some relevant facts which led to the lay-off.\nThe appellant is a Public Limited Company and has its factory in Jamshedpur. \nIt manufactures cast iron sleepers, pipes, general engineering casting and non-ferrous castings in the said factory. The raw materials mainly required for the manufacture of sleepers are pig-iron, coke, limestone and moulding sand. The Railway Board is the only buyer of sleepers and the sleepers are, therefore, manufactured only on receipt of orders upon tenders from the said Board, and not otherwise. The normal procedure for procuring raw material was that after an order was received from the Railway Board, the appellant submitted its requirement of pig iron to ,the Iron Steel Controller of the Government of India who allocates the quantity for the said commodity to the various manufactures, such as Tata Iron Steel Co. Ltd. and Indian Iron Steel Co. Ltd.\nFormerly, supply of pig iron used to come from the said two concerns to the appellant and the appellant used to pay cash to Tata Iron Steel Co. Ltd. for the pig iron supplied by it and by a Letter of credit to the Indian Iron Steel Co. Ltd. on which the said Company used to supply the raw material made by it. In 1959, both the companies stopped supply of pig iron in spite of the order issued in that behalf by the Controller, and they wrote to the appellant suggesting that the appellant should request the Controller to cancel his order and place the same with some other suppliers. Correspondence followed between the said companies and the appellant and finally in November, 1959, the appellant was informed by the said companies that they could not supply its requirements of raw material. In June, 1959, the Bhilai Steel Works made their first shipment of pig iron addressed to, the appellant. In August, 1959, the said Works despatched some wagons of pig iron to the appellant, but out of 20 wagons of the consignment, 14 were lost completely, and the rest misdelivered and were subsequently found somewhere in Gomoh and some in Tatanagar and they never reached the appellant in time.\nIn May, 1959, the appellant arranged for Letter of Credit for a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- for the Bhilai Steel Works. In August, there was a supply of 440 tons and in September, followed a supply of 36 wagons Containing pig iron to the extent of 20 to 21 tons each roughly. In all, this latter supply came to about 760 tons. \nIn the two subsequent months, no supply was received from Bhilai. The Letter of Credit which the appellant had opened for Bhilai Steel Works was revolving, with the result that as soon as one transaction was completed, the said letter was ready for the subsequent transaction. The effect of this revolving letter was that the value of credit of Rs.1,00,000/- continued to be outstanding all the time. In spite of this revolving letter, the Bhilai Steel Works failed to supply pig iron in the two months October and November.\nThe appellant reminded the Works that no supply of pig iron was received from them and yet no advice of any despatch of pig iron was received from the Works after July 27, 1959. Even the 20 wagons which had been sent in August and September did not arrive at the factory. These wagons, it was later learnt, had been delivered to K. P. Docks and some other destinations. In regard to the supply of pig iron from Rourkela, the appellant arranged for finance on cash basis. In fact, between August and December a total advance of Rs. 1,75,000/- was made to the Rourkela Steel Works.\nA supply of pig iron worth about Rs. 1,64,000/- was received by the appellant, but the balance of Rs. 11,000/- was still outstanding.,In addition to the cash advances, the appellant also opened a Letter of Credit for Rs. 1,00,000/- in November, 1959, for financing the purchase of steel from the said Works. As early as 1959, TISCO informed the appellant that it regretted that it would not be possible for it to supply the requirements of the company regularly, while in regard to the supply from IISCO, the position was still worse. The appellant kept its employees and the Assistant Labour Commissioner fully informed of these unfortunate developments from time to time. Both the Assistant Labour Commissioner and Mr. John, President of the respondents Union, did what they could by moving the Government to assist the appellant in securing the raw material. Even so, when the situation did not show any signs of improvement and the appellant found that no raw material was available with which its foundry could carry on the manufacture of sleepers, it issued a notice on December 15,- 1959, and laid off the workers of the Sleeper Factory.\nThis lay-off con- tinued until September, 11, 1960 and from September 12, 1960, the appellant closed the Sleeper Foundry department and issued notice of retrenchment. Subsequently, retrenchment compensation was duly paid to the workmen who had been retrenched. That, in short, is the background of the lay-off, the validity of which formed the subject-matter of the present reference. It appears that before the Tribunal it was urged by the respondents that the appellant had deliberately brought about a situation which led to the lay-off in order to divert the relevant orders for sleepers to its Belur factory. The argument was that at Belur, the appellant gets its work done at cheaper cost with the help of contract labour. Now, if this contention had been established then it would clearly have been a case of malafides on the part of the appellant and a claim for additional compensation may have been justified. But the Tribunal has rejected this contention and has hold that no evidence had been adduced to prove such a malafide intention on the part of the appellant.\nIt was also urged by the respondents that even in the absence of pig iron, the manufacture of sleepers could have been carried on by utilising a substitute, and in support of this case, four witnesses were examined by the respondents. The Tribunal has rejected this case also. It has found that the evidence given by the four witnesses was unreliable and unsatisfactory and the statement made by the General Manager in cross-examination on this point was sufficient to show that in the absence of pig iron, castings with scrap iron and tin could not have been made. In fact, the General Manager categorically stated that the appellant had not casted any sleeper without pig iron at any time. Thus, the alternative plea raised by the respondents to suggest that if the appellant had so desired, it could have avoided to lay-off its workmen, has also been rejected by the Tribunal. The Tribunal, however, was inclined to take the view that if the management had been more foresighted, it could have avoided the unfortunate position which it had to face at the relevant time and because the Tribunal thought that the situation which faced the appellant at the relevant time was partly due to its negligence, it reached the final conclusion that the lay-off was not altogether justified. The Tribunals view appears to be that if reasonable care had been exercised by the appellant, the situation could have been avoided.\nIt is this part, of its finding that is seriously disputed before us by the appellant.\nUnder a. 2 (kkk), lay-off means, inter alia, the failure, or inability of an employer on account of shortage of raw materials to give employment to a workman whose name is borne on the muster rolls of his industrial establishment and who has not been retrenched. As we have already seen, there is no doubt that raw materials wore not available to the appellant at the relevant time and so, the lay-off which is the subject-matter of the present dispute satisfies the test prescribed by the definition. Section 25C provides for the right of workmen laid-off for compensation, and it is common ground that compensation, equal to 50 of the total of the basic wages and dearness allowance, as therein prescribed has been paid by the appellant to the respondents. The issue referred to the Tribunal was whether the action of the management in laying off the workmen was justified. If not, to what relief were, the respondents entitled ? In other words, the reference shows that it was only if the Tribunal came to the conclusion that the lay-off wag not justified that the question of considering what additional compensation should be paid to the respondents could arise.\nUnder a. 2 (kkk), lay-off means, inter alia, the failure, or inability of an employer on account of shortage of raw materials to give employment to a workman whose name is borne on the muster rolls of his industrial establishment and who has not been retrenched. As we have already seen, there is no doubt that raw materials wore not available to the appellant at the relevant time and so, the lay-off which is the subject-matter of the present dispute satisfies the test prescribed by the definition. Section 25C provides for the right of workmen laid-off for compensation, and it is common ground that compensation, equal to 50 of the total of the basic wages and dearness allowance, as therein prescribed has been paid by the appellant to the respondents. The issue referred to the Tribunal was whether the action of the management in laying off the workmen was justified.\nIf the lay-off is justified and it satisfies the requirements of the definition under s. 2(kkk), the only relief to which the workmen laid off are entitled is the statutory relief prescribed by a. 25C.\nThere is no doubt or dispute about this position. It is also not in dispute that if the lay-off is malafide in the sense that the employer has deliberately and maliciously brought about a situation where lay off became necessary, then it would not be a lay-off which is justified under s. 2(kkk) and the relief provided to the laid-off workmen under a. 25C would not be the only relief to which they are entitled. Malafides of the employer in declaring a lay-off really mean that no lay-off, as contemplated by the definition, has in law taken place and so, a finding as to malafides of the employer in declaring a lay-off naturally takes the lay-off out of the definition of s. 2(kkk) and as such a. 25C cannot be held to be applicable to it so as to confine the workmens right to the compensation therein prescribed.\nIf the lay-off has been declared in order to victimise the workmen or for some other ulterior purpose, the position would be the same. It would Dot be a lay-off as contemplated by a. 2(kkk). But when dealing with a lay-off like the one with which we are concerned in the present appeal it would not be open to the Tribunal to enquire whether the appellant could have avoided the lay off if he had been more diligent, more careful or more far-sighted. That is a matter relating to the management of the undertaking and unless malafides are alleged or proved, it would be difficult to assume that the Industrial Tribunal has jurisdiction to sit in judgment over the acts of management of the employer and investigate whether a more prudent management could have avoided the situation which led to lay- off.\nThe appellant is, no doubt, expected to manage its affairs prudently, but it would, we think, not be reasonable or fair to hold that if the employer is faced with a situation under which for lack of raw materials he has to lay-off his workmen, it is necessary that he must submit to an enquiry by the Industrial Tribunal about the prudence of the management and the forethought displayed by it in anticipating and avoiding the difficulties. \nThat is why we think in embarking upon an enquiry as to whether the appellant had shown sufficient foresight in managing its affairs, the Tribunal has exceeded its jurisdiction. Besides, as we have just indicated, its finding on the question of negligence is not supported by any evidence on record nor by probabilities in the case. In that connection, it is significant that subsequently the section in question has been closed and the retrenched workmen have been paid retrenchment compensation due to them.", + "expert_5": "it had paid the respondents the statutory compensation for the said lay-off as prescribed by s.25C of the Industrial Disputes Act\nout of 20 wagons of the consignment, 14 were lost completely, and the rest misdelivered and were subsequently found somewhere in Gomoh and some in Tatanagar and they never reached the appellant in time.\nThe appellant reminded the Works that no supply of pig iron was received from them and yet no advice of any despatch of pig iron was received from the Works after July 27, 1959.\nEven the 20 wagons which had been sent in August and September did not arrive at the factory. These wagons, it was later learnt, had been delivered to K. P. Docks and some other destinations.\nTISCO informed the appellant that it regretted that it would not be possible for it to supply the requirements of the company regularly, while in regard to the supply from IISCO, the position was still worse.\nBut the Tribunal has rejected this contention and has hold that no evidence had been adduced to prove such a malafide intention on the part of the appellant.\nIt was also urged by the respondents that even in the absence of pig iron, the manufacture of sleepers could have been carried on by utilising a substitute, and in support of this case, four witnesses were examined by the respondents. The Tribunal has rejected this case also.\nIt has found that the evidence given by the four witnesses was unreliable and unsatisfactory and the statement made by the General Manager in cross-examination on this point was sufficient to show that in the absence of pig iron, castings with scrap iron and tin could not have been made.\nthere is no doubt that raw materials wore not available to the appellant at the relevant time and so, the lay-off which is the subject-matter of the present dispute satisfies the test prescribed by the definition.\nIn other words, the reference shows that it was only if the Tribunal came to the conclusion that the lay-off wag not justified that the question of considering what additional compensation should be paid to the respondents could arise.\nIf the lay-off is justified and it satisfies the requirements of the definition under s. 2(kkk), the only relief to which the workmen laid off are entitled is the statutory relief prescribed by a. 25C.\nBut when dealing with a lay-off like the one with which we are concerned in the present appeal it would not be open to the Tribunal to enquire whether the appellant could have avoided the lay off if he had been more diligent, more careful or more far-sighted.\nThat is a matter relating to the management of the undertaking\nunless malafides are alleged or proved, it would be difficult to assume that the Industrial Tribunal has jurisdiction to sit in judgment over the acts of management of the employer and investigate whether a more prudent management could have avoided the situation which led to lay- off.\nThe Tribunal has found that the appellant was in financial difficulties at the relevant time it has found that the appellant was not actuated by any malafide intention, it has come to the conclusion that the lay-off was not the result of any uleriort motive\nthis conclusion does not appear to be borne out by any evidence on record\nTribunal exceeded its jurisdiction in trying to decide whether better. management could have avoided the crisis.\nit would, we think, not be reasonable or fair to hold that if the employer is faced with a situation under which for lack of raw materials he has to lay-off his workmen, it is necessary that he must submit to an enquiry by the Industrial Tribunal about the prudence of the management and the forethought displayed by it in anticipating and avoiding the difficulties." + }, + "1962_47": { + "expert_1": "We allowed Civil Appeal No. 533 of 1960 on May 4, 1962, by our judgment dealing with the facts of the, case and giving the reasons for the opinion expressed. It is not necessary to repeat them. Suffice it to say that the appeal was allowed on the ground that the respondents bad lost their right to recover possession from the appellants on their estate vesting in the State of Bihar by virtue of se. 3 and 4 of the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 (Bihar Act XXX of 1950), hereinafter called the Act, and their having no subsisting right to recover possession from the appellants. It was also hold that they could not get advantage of the provisions of cl. (c) of sub-s. (1) of s. 6 of the Act as amended by the Bihar Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1959 (Act XVI of 1959) as no mortgage subsisted on the date of vesting.\nIt is contended for the respondents, who applied for the review of our judgment, that our view that the mortgage was not subsisting on the date of vesting was wrong. The contention is that even though the respondents-mortgagors had paid up the mortgage money in 1943, the mortgage continued to subsist till the date of vesting as by that time the right of redemption given by s. 60 of the Transfer of Property Act had not come to an end. That right, according to the respondents contention, would not come to an end so long as the mortgagors right to ask the mortgagees to perform any of the acts mentioned in s. 60 continues. In sup. port of the contention that the mortgage continues till the right of redemption comes to an end, reliance is placed on the case reported as Thota China Subba Rao v. Mattapalli Roju. (1) We do not agree with these contentions.\nWhen the mortgage money is paid by the mortgager to the mortgagee, there does not remain any debt due from the mortgagor to the mortgagee, and therefore the mortgage can no longer continue after the mortgage money has been paid. The transfer of interest represented by the mortgage .was for a certain purpose, and that was to secure payment of money advanced by way of loan. A security cannot exist after the loan had been paid up. If any interest in the property continues to vest in the mortgagee subsequent to the payment of the mortgage money to him, it would be an in- terest different from that of a mortgagees interest. The mortgage as a transfer of an interest in immoveable property for the purpose of securing payment of money advanced by way of loan must come to an end on the payment of the mortgage money Further, the definition of usufructuary mort gage itself leads to the conclusion that the authority given to the mortgagee to remain in possession of the mortgaged property ceases when the mortgage money has been paid up. The usufructuary mortgage, by the terms of its definition, authorises the mortgagee to retain possession only until payment of the mortgage money, and. to appropriate the rents and profits collected by him in lieu of interest or in payment of the mortgage money, or partly in lieu of interest or partly in lieu of payment of the mortgage money. When the mortgage money has been paid up, no question of appropriating the rents and profits accruing from the property towards interest or mortgage money can arise. It is clear therefore that on the payment of the mortgage money by the mortgagor to the mortgagee the mortgage comes to an end and the right of the mortgagee to remain in possession also comes to an end.\nThe right conferred by this section is called a right to redeem and a suit to enforce it is called a suit for redemption. x x x x It is to be noted that these provisions do not. state when a mortgage ceases to be a mortgage. They simply describe the right of a mortgagor to redeem. Now, what is this right and, in what circumstances does it arise? The right arises oh the principal money, payment of which is secured by the mortgage deed, becoming due. The right entitles the mortgagor, on his paying or tendering to the mortgagee the mortgage money to ask him (i) to deliver to him the mortgage deed and other documents relating to the mortgaged property to deliver possession to the mortgagor, if the mortgagee is in possession and (iii) to re-transfer the mortgaged property in accordance with the desire of the mortgagor. \nIf the mortgagee receives the money and does not perform any of the three acts required of him to be done,, the question arises whether this non-compliance with the demands will make the mortgage continue. The provisions of the section do not say so and there appears no good reason why the mortgage should continue. If the mortgagee is not to perform these acts, the mortgagor is not to pay the amount. If, however, the mortgage money has been received by the mortgagee and thereafter he refuses to perform the acts he is bound to do, the mortgagor can enforce his right to get back the mortgage document, the possession of the mortgaged property and the reconveyance of that property through Court. A new right to get his demands enforced through the Court thus arises as a result of the provisions of s. 60 of the Act. If the mortgage money has been paid and then the mortgagor goes to Court to enforce his demands, that would not be to enforce his right of redemption which was really his right to make those demands on payment of the mortgage money.\nThe right to demand the mortgagee to do certain things on payment of the mortgage money is different from enforcing the demands subsequent to the payment of the money. This is also clear from the decree for redemption. Order XXXIV, r. 7, C.P.C. provides for the preliminary decree in a redemption suit and the preliminary decree is to order that the account be taken of what was due to the defendant, viz., the mortgagee, at the date of the decree, for principal and interest on the mortgage and other matters. Rule 9 provides that if on such accounting, any sum be found due to the mortgagor, the decree would direct the mortgagee to pay such amount to the mortgagor. If the mortgage money due has been already paid by the mortgagor and has been accepted by the mortgagee in full discharge of the mortgage deed, no occasion for such accounting arises and therefore any suit to enforce the return of the mortgage deed and to get back the possession of the mortgaged property cannot be a suit for redemption. \nWhat Thota China Subba Raos Case (1), referred to by learned counsel for the respondents, lays down is simply this that, the right of redemption continues so long as the mortgage is alive. The case does not deal with the circumstances in which the mortgage ceases to exist.\nThe following observation support, by implication, the view taken by us The document passed in favour of the wife of the mortgagor can be described as a (1) 1949 F.C.R. 484, 498. reward promised to her for bringing about the willingness of her husband to agree to convey the mortgaged lands to the mortgagees. That can in no event be considered as extinguishing the equity of redemption.\nThere is however no document or evidence to show that the mortgagees agreed to accept these lands in full satisfaction of their claims or promised to pay the sum of Rs. 100 mentioned therein. This was only an agreement to convey the lands after three months, and, if at ail the question of extinction of the equity of redemption could arise on the conveyance being executed but not before.\nAs we see it, that is not a case of redemption at all. At the moment when the, rents and profits of the mortgaged property sufficed to discharge the principal secured by th e mortgage, the mortgage came to an end and the correlative right arose in the mortgagor to recover possession of the property. \nThe framers of the Transfer of Property Act have clearly recognised the distinction between the procedure which follows a mortgagors desire to redeem a subsisting mortgage and the procedure which follows the arising of a usufructuary mortgagors right to get his property back after the principal has been paid off.\nWe therefore hold that the mortgage was not subsisting on the date of vesting, it having come to an end on payment of the mortgage money in 1943. and that the respondents cannot get the advantage of s. 6(1)(c) of the Act.", + "expert_2": "the appeal was allowed on the ground that the respondents bad lost their right to recover possession from the appellants on their estate vesting in the State of Bihar by virtue of se. 3 and 4 of the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 (Bihar Act XXX of 1950), hereinafter called the Act, and their having no subsisting right to recover possession from the appellants. It was also hold that they could not get advantage of the provisions of cl. (c) of sub-s. (1) of s. 6 of the Act as amended by the Bihar Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1959 (Act XVI of 1959) as no mortgage subsisted on the date of vesting.\nrespondents-mortgagors had paid up the mortgage money in 1943, the mortgage continued to subsist till the date of vesting as by that time the right of redemption given by s. 60 of the Transfer of Property Act had not come to an end. That right, according to the respondents contention, would not come to an end so long as the mortgagors right to ask the mortgagees to perform any of the acts mentioned in s. 60 continues.\nWhen the mortgage money is paid by the mortgager to the mortgagee, there does not remain any debt due from the mortgagor to the mortgagee, and therefore the mortgage can no longer continue after the mortgage money has been paid. The transfer of interest represented by the mortgage .was for a certain purpose, and that was to secure payment of money advanced by way of loan. A security cannot exist after the loan had been paid up. If any interest in the property continues to vest in the mortgagee subsequent to the payment of the mortgage money to him, it would be an in- terest different from that of a mortgagees interest.\nThe mortgage as a transfer of an interest in immoveable property for the purpose of securing payment of money advanced by way of loan must come to an end on the payment of the mortgage money Further, the definition of usufructuary mort gage itself leads to the conclusion that the authority given to the mortgagee to remain in possession of the mortgaged property ceases when the mortgage money has been paid up. The usufructuary mortgage, by the terms of its definition, authorises the mortgagee to retain possession only until payment of the mortgage money, and. to appropriate the rents and profits collected by him in lieu of interest or in payment of the mortgage money, or partly in lieu of interest or partly in lieu of payment of the mortgage money. When the mortgage money has been paid up, no question of appropriating the rents and profits accruing from the property towards interest or mortgage money can arise.\nThe right arises oh the principal money, payment of which is secured by the mortgage deed, becoming due. The right entitles the mortgagor, on his paying or tendering to the mortgagee the mortgage money to ask him (i) to deliver to him the mortgage deed and other documents relating to the mortgaged property to deliver possession to the mortgagor, if the mortgagee is in possession and (iii) to re-transfer the mortgaged property in accordance with the desire of the mortgagor. \nIf the mortgagee receives the money and does not perform any of the three acts required of him to be done,, the question arises whether this non-compliance with the demands will make the mortgage continue.\nIf the mortgage money has been paid and then the mortgagor goes to Court to enforce his demands, that would not be to enforce his right of redemption which was really his right to make those demands on payment of the mortgage money. The right to demand the mortgagee to do certain things on payment of the mortgage money is different from enforcing the demands subsequent to the payment of the money.\nIf the mortgage money due has been already paid by the mortgagor and has been accepted by the mortgagee in full discharge of the mortgage deed, no occasion for such accounting arises and therefore any suit to enforce the return of the mortgage deed and to get back the possession of the mortgaged property cannot be a suit for redemption.\nThe document passed in favour of the wife of the mortgagor can be described as a (1) 1949 F.C.R. 484, 498. reward promised to her for bringing about the willingness of her husband to agree to convey the mortgaged lands to the mortgagees. That can in no event be considered as extinguishing the equity of redemption.\nIt therefore follows that the only property which a second or other subsequent mortgagee may redeem is the property on which the first mortgagee is entitled to enforce his security. From the very necessity of things the right of redemp- tion can be exercised in respect of such pro- perty only as is subject to a mortgage capable of enforcement. There can be nothing for enforcing a mortgage when the money has been paid up and therefore the right to redeem ceases on payment of the mortgage money.\nSection 62 says that in the case of a usufructuary mortgage the mortgagor has a right to recover possession of the property when (In a case in which the mortgagee is authorised to pay himself the mortgage money out of the rents and ,profits of the property) the principal money is paid off. As we see it, that is not a case of redemption at all. At the moment when the, rents and profits of the mortgaged property sufficed to discharge the principal secured by th e mortgage, the mortgage came to an end and the correlative right arose in the mortgagor to recover possession of the property. \nThe framers of the Transfer of Property Act have clearly recognised the distinction between the procedure which follows a mortgagors desire to redeem a subsisting mortgage and the procedure which follows the arising of a usufructuary mortgagors right to get his property back after the principal has been paid off. We therefore hold that the mortgage was not subsisting on the date of vesting, it having come to an end on payment of the mortgage money in 1943. and that the respondents cannot get the advantage of s. 6(1)(c) of the Act.", + "expert_3": "-We allowed Civil Appeal No. 533 of 1960 on May 4, 1962, by our judgment dealing with the facts of the, case and giving the reasons for the opinion expressed. It is not necessary to repeat them. Suffice it to say that the appeal was allowed on the ground that the respondents bad lost their right to recover possession from the appellants on their estate vesting in the State of Bihar by virtue of se. 3 and 4 of the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 (Bihar Act XXX of 1950), hereinafter called the Act, and their having no subsisting right to recover possession from the appellants\nIt was also hold that they could not get advantage of the provisions of cl\n(c) of sub-s. (1) of s. 6 of the Act as amended by the Bihar Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1959 (Act XVI of 1959) as no mortgage subsisted on the date of vesting\nThe amended cl. (c) read a, follows (c) lands used for agricultural or horti. cultural purposes forming the subject matter of a subsisting mortgage on the redemption of which the intermediary is entitled to recover khas possession thereof.\nSection 58 of the Transfer of Property Act defines mortgage to be a transfer of an interest (1) 1949 F.C.R. 484, 498. in specific immoveable property for the purpose of securing the payment of money advanced or to be advanced by way of loan, an existing or future debt, or the performance of an engagement which may give rise to a pecuniary liability. It also defines various varieties of mortgage and, in clause (d) defines ,usufructuary mortgage thus Where the mortgagor delivers possession or expressly or by implication binds himself to deliver possession of the mortgaged property to the mortgagee, and authorizes him to retain such possession until payment of the mortgage- money, and to receive the rents and profits accruing from the property or any part of such rents and profits and to appropriate the same in lieu of interest, or in payment of the mortgage money, or partly in lieu of interest or partly in payment of the mortgagemoney, the transaction is called an usufructuary mortgage and the mortgagee an usufructuary mortgagee\nWhen the mortgage money is paid by the mortgager to the mortgagee, there does not remain any debt due from the mortgagor to the mortgagee, and therefore the mortgage can no longer continue after the mortgage money has been paid. The transfer of interest represented by the mortgage .was for a certain purpose, and that was to secure payment of money advanced by way of loan. A security cannot exist after the loan had been paid up\nIf any interest in the property continues to vest in the mortgagee subsequent to the payment of the mortgage money to him, it would be an in- terest different from that of a mortgagees interest. The mortgage as a transfer of an interest in immoveable property for the purpose of securing payment of money advanced by way of loan must come to an end on the payment of the mortgage money Further, the definition of usufructuary mort gage itself leads to the conclusion that the authority given to the mortgagee to remain in possession of the mortgaged property ceases when the mortgage money has been paid up.\nThe usufructuary mortgage, by the terms of its definition, authorises the mortgagee to retain possession only until payment of the mortgage money, and. to appropriate the rents and profits collected by him in lieu of interest or in payment of the mortgage money, or partly in lieu of interest or partly in lieu of payment of the mortgage money. When the mortgage money has been paid up, no question of appropriating the rents and profits accruing from the property towards interest or mortgage money can arise\nIt is clear therefore that on the payment of the mortgage money by the mortgagor to the mortgagee the mortgage comes to an end and the right of the mortgagee to remain in possession also comes to an end\nThe relevant portion of s. 60 on which the respondents rely reads \n At any time after the principal money has become due, the mortgagor has a right, on payment or tender, at a proper time and place of the mortgage-money, to require the mortgagee to deliver to the mortgagor the mortgage deed and all documents relating to the mortgaged property which are in the possession of power of the mortgagee where the mortgagee is in possession of the mortgaged property,, to deliver possession thereof to the mortgagor, and at the cost of the mortgagor either to re-transfer the mortgaged property to him or to such third person as he may direct,. or to execute and (where the mortgage has been effected by a registered instrument to have registered an acknowledg- ment in writing that any right in derogation of his interest transferred to the mortgagee has been extinguished Provided that the right conferred by this section has not been extinguished by the act of the parties or by decree of a Court\nThe right conferred by this section is called a right to redeem and a suit to enforce it is called a suit for redemption. x x x x It is to be noted that these provisions do not. state when a mortgage ceases to be a mortgage. They simply describe the right of a mortgagor to redeem.\nNow, what is this right and, in what circumstances does it arise? The right arises oh the principal money, payment of which is secured by the mortgage deed, becoming due. The right entitles the mortgagor, on his paying or tendering to the mortgagee the mortgage money to ask him (i) to deliver to him the mortgage deed and other documents relating to the mortgaged property to deliver possession to the mortgagor, if the mortgagee is in possession and (iii) to re-transfer the mortgaged property in accordance with the desire of the mortgagor\nIf the mortgagee receives the money and does not perform any of the three acts required of him to be done,, the question arises whether this non-compliance with the demands will make the mortgage continue. The provisions of the section do not say so and there appears no good reason why the mortgage should continue\nIf the mortgagee is not to perform these acts, the mortgagor is not to pay the amount. If, however, the mortgage money has been received by the mortgagee and thereafter he refuses to perform the acts he is bound to do, the mortgagor can enforce his right to get back the mortgage document, the possession of the mortgaged property and the reconveyance of that property through Court. A new right to get his demands enforced through the Court thus arises as a result of the provisions of s. 60 of the Act.\nIf the mortgage money has been paid and then the mortgagor goes to Court to enforce his demands, that would not be to enforce his right of redemption which was really his right to make those demands on payment of the mortgage money. The right to demand the mortgagee to do certain things on payment of the mortgage money is different from enforcing the demands subsequent to the payment of the money.\nThis is also clear from the decree for redemption. Order XXXIV, r. 7, C.P.C. provides for the preliminary decree in a redemption suit and the preliminary decree is to order that the account be taken of what was due to the defendant, viz., the mortgagee, at the date of the decree, for principal and interest on the mortgage and other matters. Rule 9 provides that if on such accounting, any sum be found due to the mortgagor, the decree would direct the mortgagee to pay such amount to the mortgagor\nIf the mortgage money due has been already paid by the mortgagor and has been accepted by the mortgagee in full discharge of the mortgage deed, no occasion for such accounting arises and therefore any suit to enforce the return of the mortgage deed and to get back the possession of the mortgaged property cannot be a suit for redemption\nthe right of redemption continues so long as the mortgage is alive. The case does not deal with the circumstances in which the mortgage ceases to exist.\nThe following observation support, by implication, the view taken by us The document passed in favour of the wife of the mortgagor can be described as a (1) 1949 F.C.R. 484, 498. reward promised to her for bringing about the willingness of her husband to agree to convey the mortgaged lands to the mortgagees. That can in no event be considered as extinguishing the equity of redemption. The mortgagor was not even a party to that document\nThe second document executed by the mortgagor is a agreement to convey the lands after three months. There is however no document or evidence to show that the mortgagees agreed to accept these lands in full satisfaction of their claims or promised to pay the sum of Rs. 100 mentioned therein\nThis was only an agreement to convey the lands after three months, and, if at ail the question of extinction of the equity of redemption could arise on the conveyance being executed but not before\nthe contract of mortgage in the present case being subject to the provisions of the Regulation, the charge would have been redeemed as soon as the principal mortgage money with twelve percent interest had been realised by the mortgagee from the profits of the property\nIt cannot be disputed that the right of redemption pre-supposes the existence of a mortgage on certain property which at the (1) (1886) I.L.R. 8 All. 402, 405. (2) (1895) I.L.R. 18 All. 189,192. time of redemption is security for the money due to the mortgagee.\nIt therefore follows that the only property which a second or other subsequent mortgagee may redeem is the property on which the first mortgagee is entitled to enforce his security. From the very necessity of things the right of redemp- tion can be exercised in respect of such pro- perty only as is subject to a mortgage capable of enforcement. There can be nothing for enforcing a mortgage when the money has been paid up and therefore the right to redeem ceases on payment of the mortgage money.\nthe right to redeem can only be extinguished by act of parties or by a decree of a Court\nBut when it is by act of parties the Act must take the shape and observe the formalities which the law prescribes. One Method is by payment in cash. In that event nothing is necessary beyond the payment\nIn Ram Prasad v. Bishambhar Singh (2) the question formulated for determination was whether the suit being a suit to recover possession of the mortgaged property after the mortgage money had been paid off was a suit against the mortgagee to redeem or to recover possession of immovable property mortgaged\nBraund J., said Now, it is quite obvious that that section (s. 60 of the Transfer of Property Act) can only refer to a case in which a mortgagor under a subsisting mortgage approaches the Court to establish his right to redeem and to I.L.R. 1950 Nag. 618, 621. (2) A.I.R. 1946. All. 400,402. have that redemption carried out by the pro- cess of the various declarations and orders of the Court by which it effects redemption.\nIn other words. s. 60 contemplates a cage in which the mortgage is still subsisting and the mortgagor goes to the Court to obtain the return of his property on repayment of what is still due.\nSection 62, on the other hand, is in marked contract to s. 60. Section 62 says that in the case of a usufructuary mortgage the mortgagor has a right to recover possession of the property when (In a case in which the mortgagee is authorised to pay himself the mortgage money out of the rents and ,profits of the property) the principal money is paid off.\nAs we see it, that is not a case of redemption at all. At the moment when the, rents and profits of the mortgaged property sufficed to discharge the principal secured by th e mortgage, the mortgage came to an end and the correlative right arose in the mortgagor to recover possession of the property. \nThe framers of the Transfer of Property Act have clearly recognised the distinction between the procedure which follows a mortgagors desire to redeem a subsisting mortgage and the procedure which follows the arising of a usufructuary mortgagors right to get his property back after the principal has been paid off.\nWe therefore hold that the mortgage was not subsisting on the date of vesting, it having come to an end on payment of the mortgage money in 1943. and that the respondents cannot get the advantage of s. 6(1)(c) of the Act.", + "expert_4": "Suffice it to say that the appeal was allowed on the ground that the respondents bad lost their right to recover possession from the appellants on their estate vesting in the State of Bihar by virtue of se. 3 and 4 of the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 (Bihar Act XXX of 1950), hereinafter called the Act, and their having no subsisting right to recover possession from the appellants.\nIt was also hold that they could not get advantage of the provisions of cl. (c) of sub-s. (1) of s. 6 of the Act as amended by the Bihar Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1959 (Act XVI of 1959) as no mortgage subsisted on the date of vesting.\nThe amended cl. (c) read a, follows (c) lands used for agricultural or horti. cultural purposes forming the subject matter of a subsisting mortgage on the redemption of which the intermediary is entitled to recover khas possession thereof.\nIt is contended for the respondents, who applied for the review of our judgment, that our view that the mortgage was not subsisting on the date of vesting was wrong. The contention is that even though the respondents-mortgagors had paid up the mortgage money in 1943, the mortgage continued to subsist till the date of vesting as by that time the right of redemption given by s. 60 of the Transfer of Property Act had not come to an end.\nThat right, according to the respondents contention, would not come to an end so long as the mortgagors right to ask the mortgagees to perform any of the acts mentioned in s. 60 continues. In sup. port of the contention that the mortgage continues till the right of redemption comes to an end, reliance is placed on the case reported as Thota China Subba Rao v.\nWe do not agree with these contentions.\nSection 58 of the Transfer of Property Act defines mortgage to be a transfer of an interest (1) 1949 F.C.R. 484, 498. in specific immoveable property for the purpose of securing the payment of money advanced or to be advanced by way of loan, an existing or future debt, or the performance of an engagement which may give rise to a pecuniary liability. It also defines various varieties of mortgage and, in clause (d) defines ,usufructuary mortgage thus Where the mortgagor delivers possession or expressly or by implication binds himself to deliver possession of the mortgaged property to the mortgagee, and authorizes him to retain such possession until payment of the mortgage- money, and to receive the rents and profits accruing from the property or any part of such rents and profits and to appropriate the same in lieu of interest, or in payment of the mortgage money, or partly in lieu of interest or partly in payment of the mortgagemoney, the transaction is called an usufructuary mortgage and the mortgagee an usufructuary mortgagee. When the mortgage money is paid by the mortgager to the mortgagee, there does not remain any debt due from the mortgagor to the mortgagee, and therefore the mortgage can no longer continue after the mortgage money has been paid. The transfer of interest represented by the mortgage .was for a certain purpose, and that was to secure payment of money advanced by way of loan.\nA security cannot exist after the loan had been paid up. If any interest in the property continues to vest in the mortgagee subsequent to the payment of the mortgage money to him, it would be an in- terest different from that of a mortgagees interest. The mortgage as a transfer of an interest in immoveable property for the purpose of securing payment of money advanced by way of loan must come to an end on the payment of the mortgage money Further, the definition of usufructuary mort gage itself leads to the conclusion that the authority given to the mortgagee to remain in possession of the mortgaged property ceases when the mortgage money has been paid up.\nThe usufructuary mortgage, by the terms of its definition, authorises the mortgagee to retain possession only until payment of the mortgage money, and. to appropriate the rents and profits collected by him in lieu of interest or in payment of the mortgage money, or partly in lieu of interest or partly in lieu of payment of the mortgage money.\nWhen the mortgage money has been paid up, no question of appropriating the rents and profits accruing from the property towards interest or mortgage money can arise. It is clear therefore that on the payment of the mortgage money by the mortgagor to the mortgagee the mortgage comes to an end and the right of the mortgagee to remain in possession also comes to an end. The relevant portion of s. 60 on which the respondents rely reads \n At any time after the principal money has become due, the mortgagor has a right, on payment or tender, at a proper time and place of the mortgage-money, to require the mortgagee to deliver to the mortgagor the mortgage deed and all documents relating to the mortgaged property which are in the possession of power of the mortgagee where the mortgagee is in possession of the mortgaged property,, to deliver possession thereof to the mortgagor, and at the cost of the mortgagor either to re-transfer the mortgaged property to him or to such third person as he may direct,. or to execute and (where the mortgage has been effected by a registered instrument to have registered an acknowledg- ment in writing that any right in derogation of his interest transferred to the mortgagee has been extinguished Provided that the right conferred by this section has not been extinguished by the act of the parties or by decree of a Court.\nThe right conferred by this section is called a right to redeem and a suit to enforce it is called a suit for redemption. x x x x It is to be noted that these provisions do not. state when a mortgage ceases to be a mortgage.\nThey simply describe the right of a mortgagor to redeem. Now, what is this right and, in what circumstances does it arise? The right arises oh the principal money, payment of which is secured by the mortgage deed, becoming due.\nThe right entitles the mortgagor, on his paying or tendering to the mortgagee the mortgage money to ask him (i) to deliver to him the mortgage deed and other documents relating to the mortgaged property to deliver possession to the mortgagor, if the mortgagee is in possession and (iii) to re-transfer the mortgaged property in accordance with the desire of the mortgagor.\nIf the mortgagee receives the money and does not perform any of the three acts required of him to be done,, the question arises whether this non-compliance with the demands will make the mortgage continue. The provisions of the section do not say so and there appears no good reason why the mortgage should continue. If the mortgagee is not to perform these acts, the mortgagor is not to pay the amount.\nIf, however, the mortgage money has been received by the mortgagee and thereafter he refuses to perform the acts he is bound to do, the mortgagor can enforce his right to get back the mortgage document, the possession of the mortgaged property and the reconveyance of that property through Court.\nA new right to get his demands enforced through the Court thus arises as a result of the provisions of s. 60 of the Act. If the mortgage money has been paid and then the mortgagor goes to Court to enforce his demands, that would not be to enforce his right of redemption which was really his right to make those demands on payment of the mortgage money. The right to demand the mortgagee to do certain things on payment of the mortgage money is different from enforcing the demands subsequent to the payment of the money.\nThis is also clear from the decree for redemption.\nOrder XXXIV, r. 7, C.P.C. provides for the preliminary decree in a redemption suit and the preliminary decree is to order that the account be taken of what was due to the defendant, viz., the mortgagee, at the date of the decree, for principal and interest on the mortgage and other matters. Rule 9 provides that if on such accounting, any sum be found due to the mortgagor, the decree would direct the mortgagee to pay such amount to the mortgagor. If the mortgage money due has been already paid by the mortgagor and has been accepted by the mortgagee in full discharge of the mortgage deed, no occasion for such accounting arises and therefore any suit to enforce the return of the mortgage deed and to get back the possession of the mortgaged property cannot be a suit for redemption.\nWhat Thota China Subba Raos Case (1), referred to by learned counsel for the respondents, lays down is simply this that, the right of redemption continues so long as the mortgage is alive.\nThe case does not deal with the circumstances in which the mortgage ceases to exist. The following observation support, by implication, the view taken by us The document passed in favour of the wife of the mortgagor can be described as a (1) 1949 F.C.R. 484, 498. reward promised to her for bringing about the willingness of her husband to agree to convey the mortgaged lands to the mortgagees. That can in no event be considered as extinguishing the equity of redemption.\nThe mortgagor was not even a party to that document.\nThe second document executed by the mortgagor is a agreement to convey the lands after three months. There is however no document or evidence to show that the mortgagees agreed to accept these lands in full satisfaction of their claims or promised to pay the sum of Rs. 100 mentioned therein. This was only an agreement to convey the lands after three months, and, if at ail the question of extinction of the equity of redemption could arise on the conveyance being executed but not before.\nThere are other oases also which throw a light on this question And go against the contention of the respondents.\nIn Samar Ali v. Karim-ul-lah (1) it was said Now, as I have said, the contract of mortgage in the present case being subject to the provisions of the Regulation, the charge would have been redeemed as soon as the principal mortgage money with twelve percent interest had been realised by the mortgagee from the profits of the property. In Muhammed Mahmud Ali v. Kalyan Das (2) it was said It cannot be disputed that the right of redemption pre-supposes the existence of a mortgage on certain property which at the (1) (1886) I.L.R. 8 All. 402, 405. (2) (1895) I.L.R. 18 All. 189,192. time of redemption is security for the money due to the mortgagee.\nIt therefore follows that the only property which a second or other subsequent mortgagee may redeem is the property on which the first mortgagee is entitled to enforce his security. From the very necessity of things the right of redemp- tion can be exercised in respect of such pro- perty only as is subject to a mortgage capable of enforcement. There can be nothing for enforcing a mortgage when the money has been paid up and therefore the right to redeem ceases on payment of the mortgage money.\nThere can be nothing for enforcing a mortgage when the money has been paid up and therefore the right to redeem ceases on payment of the mortgage money. In Balakrishna v.Rangnath (1) it was said Now the right to redeem can only be extinguished by act of parties or by a decree of a Court. (See the proviso to section 60 of the Transfer of Property Act). But when it is by act of parties the Act must take the shape and observe the formalities which the law prescribes. One Method is by payment in cash. In that event nothing is necessary beyond the payment. In Ram Prasad v.\nIn Balakrishna v.Rangnath (1) it was said Now the right to redeem can only be extinguished by act of parties or by a decree of a Court.\nSee the proviso to section 60 of the Transfer of Property Act). But when it is by act of parties the Act must take the shape and observe the formalities which the law prescribes. One Method is by payment in cash.\nIn that event nothing is necessary beyond the payment.\nIn other words. s. 60 contemplates a cage in which the mortgage is still subsisting and the mortgagor goes to the Court to obtain the return of his property on repayment of what is still due. Section 62, on the other hand, is in marked contract to s. 60.\nAs we see it, that is not a case of redemption at all. At the moment when the, rents and profits of the mortgaged property sufficed to discharge the principal secured by th e mortgage, the mortgage came to an end and the correlative right arose in the mortgagor to recover possession of the property. \nThe framers of the Transfer of Property Act have clearly recognised the distinction between the procedure which follows a mortgagors desire to redeem a subsisting mortgage and the procedure which follows the arising of a usufructuary mortgagors right to get his property back after the principal has been paid off. We therefore hold that the mortgage was not subsisting on the date of vesting, it having come to an end on payment of the mortgage money in 1943. and that the respondents cannot get the advantage of s. 6(1)(c) of the Act.", + "expert_5": "Where the mortgagor delivers possession or expressly or by implication binds himself to deliver possession of the mortgaged property to the mortgagee, and authorizes him to retain such possession until payment of the mortgage- money, and to receive the rents and profits accruing from the property or any part of such rents and profits and to appropriate the same in lieu of interest, or in payment of the mortgage money, or partly in lieu of interest or partly in payment of the mortgagemoney, the transaction is called an usufructuary mortgage and the mortgagee an usufructuary mortgagee.\nWhen the mortgage money is paid by the mortgager to the mortgagee, there does not remain any debt due from the mortgagor to the mortgagee, and therefore the mortgage can no longer continue after the mortgage money has been paid. The transfer of interest represented by the mortgage .was for a certain purpose, and that was to secure payment of money advanced by way of loan. A security cannot exist after the loan had been paid up. If any interest in the property continues to vest in the mortgagee subsequent to the payment of the mortgage money to him, it would be an in- terest different from that of a mortgagees interest.\nThe mortgage as a transfer of an interest in immoveable property for the purpose of securing payment of money advanced by way of loan must come to an end on the payment of the mortgage money\nFurther, the definition of usufructuary mort gage itself leads to the conclusion that the authority given to the mortgagee to remain in possession of the mortgaged property ceases when the mortgage money has been paid up.\nThe usufructuary mortgage, by the terms of its definition, authorises the mortgagee to retain possession only until payment of the mortgage money, and. to appropriate the rents and profits collected by him in lieu of interest or in payment of the mortgage money, or partly in lieu of interest or partly in lieu of payment of the mortgage money.\nWhen the mortgage money has been paid up, no question of appropriating the rents and profits accruing from the property towards interest or mortgage money can arise.\nIt is to be noted that these provisions do not. state when a mortgage ceases to be a mortgage.\nThe right arises oh the principal money, payment of which is secured by the mortgage deed, becoming due.\nThe right entitles the mortgagor, on his paying or tendering to the mortgagee the mortgage money to ask him (i) to deliver to him the mortgage deed and other documents relating to the mortgaged property to deliver possession to the mortgagor, if the mortgagee is in possession and (iii) to re-transfer the mortgaged property in accordance with the desire of the mortgagor.\nThe provisions of the section do not say so and there appears no good reason why the mortgage should continue.\nIf, however, the mortgage money has been received by the mortgagee and thereafter he refuses to perform the acts he is bound to do, the mortgagor can enforce his right to get back the mortgage document, the possession of the mortgaged property and the reconveyance of that property through Court.\nIf the mortgage money has been paid and then the mortgagor goes to Court to enforce his demands, that would not be to enforce his right of redemption which was really his right to make those demands on payment of the mortgage money.\nThe right to demand the mortgagee to do certain things on payment of the mortgage money is different from enforcing the demands subsequent to the payment of the money.\nOrder XXXIV, r. 7, C.P.C. provides for the preliminary decree in a redemption suit and the preliminary decree is to order that the account be taken of what was due to the defendant, viz., the mortgagee, at the date of the decree, for principal and interest on the mortgage and other matters. Rule 9 provides that if on such accounting, any sum be found due to the mortgagor, the decree would direct the mortgagee to pay such amount to the mortgagor.\nWhat Thota China Subba Raos Case (1), referred to by learned counsel for the respondents, lays down is simply this that, the right of redemption continues so long as the mortgage is alive.\nThere are other oases also which throw a light on this question And go against the contention of the respondents. In Samar Ali v. Karim-ul-lah (1) it was said Now, as I have said, the contract of mortgage in the present case being subject to the provisions of the Regulation, the charge would have been redeemed as soon as the principal mortgage money with twelve percent interest had been realised by the mortgagee from the profits of the property.\nIn Muhammed Mahmud Ali v. Kalyan Das (2) it was said It cannot be disputed that the right of redemption pre-supposes the existence of a mortgage on certain property which at the (1) (1886) I.L.R. 8 All. 402, 405. (2) (1895) I.L.R. 18 All. 189,192. time of redemption is security for the money due to the mortgagee.\nThere can be nothing for enforcing a mortgage when the money has been paid up and therefore the right to redeem ceases on payment of the mortgage money.\nIn Balakrishna v.Rangnath (1) it was said Now the right to redeem can only be extinguished by act of parties or by a decree of a Court. (See the proviso to section 60 of the Transfer of Property Act). But when it is by act of parties the Act must take the shape and observe the formalities which the law prescribes. One Method is by payment in cash. In that event nothing is necessary beyond the payment.\nIn Ram Prasad v. Bishambhar Singh (2) the question formulated for determination was whether the suit being a suit to recover possession of the mortgaged property after the mortgage money had been paid off was a suit against the mortgagee to redeem or to recover possession of immovable property mortgaged.\ns. 60 contemplates a cage in which the mortgage is still subsisting and the mortgagor goes to the Court to obtain the return of his property on repayment of what is still due.\nSection 62 says that in the case of a usufructuary mortgage the mortgagor has a right to recover possession of the property when (In a case in which the mortgagee is authorised to pay himself the mortgage money out of the rents and ,profits of the property) the principal money is paid off.\nThe framers of the Transfer of Property Act have clearly recognised the distinction between the procedure which follows a mortgagors desire to redeem a subsisting mortgage and the procedure which follows the arising of a usufructuary mortgagors right to get his property back after the principal has been paid off.\nthe mortgage was not subsisting on the date of vesting, it having come to an end on payment of the mortgage money in 1943" + }, + "1963_37": { + "expert_1": "Mr. R. K. Banerjee had been employed by the appellant, the Tata Oil Mills Co. Ltd.as a Salesman on April 3, 1956, as a probationer and he was confirmed on November 5, 1956. On December 5, 1959, his services were terminated and he was informed that the appellant had lost confidence in him, and so, it bad decided to discharge him. Accordingly, in lieu of notice, he was paid a months salary and was told that he ceased to be the employee of the appe- llant as from the date next after he received the order from the appellant. \nThe discharge of Mr. Banerjee was resented by the Union to which he belonged and the Union took up his case. Since the dispute could not be settled amicably, the Union succeeded in persuading the Government of West Bengal to refer the dispute for adjudication to the Second Labour Court on the ground that the said discharge was not justified. That is how the discharge of Mr. Banerjee became an industrial dispute between the appellant and the respondents, its workmen represented by their Union. The Labour Court which tried the dispute came to the conclusion that the appellant had failed to justify the discharge of Mr. Banerjee and so, it has directed the appellant to reinstate him and pay him full emoluments from the date of his discharge up to the date of his reinstatement.\nIt is this order which is challenged by the appellant by its present appeal brought to this Court by special leave.\nThe material facts leading to the termination of Mr. Banerjees services lie within a very narrow compass. in November, 1959 Mr. Banerjee was working in the Assam area and as such, had to work as a Salesman at Dhubri, Bongaigoan, Rangia and Tejpur. The appellant expected that as its Salesman Mr. Banerjee should visit dealers in his area and carry on intelligent and intensive propaganda to popularise the sale of the appellants products. The appellant has a Sales ice in Calcutta and the manager of the said ice visits the areas within his jurisdiction to inspect the work of Salesmen. \nAccordingly Mr. Gupta who was then the manager of the Calcutta ice visited the area assigned to Mr. Banerjee, in the last week of October. He found that Mr. Banerjee was networking satisfactorily as a Salesman. In particular, he noticed that whereas Mr. Banerjee had reported to the ice that the Bongaigoan Stockists had 20 boxes of dried up and deshaped 501 Special Soap which could not be distributed in the market he had in fact not opened a single box and had not cared to satisfy himself that the soaps had either dried up or had been deshaped. In fact, Mr. Gupta found that the boxes were intact and he opened them and discovered that five boxes contained soap which had dried up and had become deshaped, whereas the 15 other boxes were in good condition.\nThereupon, Mr. Gupta made a report to the zonal Manager on November 2, 1959, adversely commenting on Mr. Banerjees work. The said report was in due course forwarded to the Head ice in Bombay. The Head ice then instructed the Calcutta Sales ice by telephone to send for Mr. Banerjee and call for his explanation. Accordingly, Mr. Banerjee was sent for and his explanation taken Mr. Gupta then made another report expressing his dissatisfaction with the explanation given by Mr. Banerjee. This report was sent on November 24, 1959. The Head ice accepted this report and on December 5, 1959, issued to Mr, Banerjee the order terminating his services. That, in brief, is the case set out by the appellant in support of the action taken by it against Mr. Banerjee. The appellant had alleged that the termination of Mr. Banerjees services was not dismissal but was a discharge simpliciter, and according to it, the discharge was justified by the terms of contract between the appellant and Mr. Banerjee as embodied in Rule 40 (1) of the Service Rules of -the appellant. The appellant, therefore, urged that the Labour Court had no jurisdiction to consider the propriety of the appellants action in discharging Mr. Banerjee. The respondents, on the other hand, contended that the discharge was not discharge simpliciter but was, in substance, dismissal, and so, it was urged that the Labour Court was entitled to consider the propriety of the appellants action. Basing themselves on the plea that the discharge amounted to dismissal, the respondents pleaded that the failure of the appellant to hold an enquiry against Mr. Banerjee introduced a serious infirmity in the order passed against him and they argued that the conduct of the appellant was malafide and the dismissal of Mr. Banerjee amounted to victimisation. The Labour Court has found that according to the terms of contract under which Mr. Banerjee was employed by the appellant, the appellant was entitled to discharge Mr.\nBanerjee from its employment under Rule 40 (1) of the Service Rules but it held that merely because the order served on Mr. Banerjee purported to be an order of discharge, that would not exclude the jurisdiction of the Labour Court to examine the substance of the matter. In fact, Mr. joshi who appeared for the appellant conceded before the Labour Court that an adjudicating Court can look into the reasons behind the discharge of an employee. That is why evidence was led by- both the parties before the Labour Court. Having considered that evidence, the Labour Court has found that the respondents plea about the mala fides of the appellant was not proved and it held that the termination of Mr. Banerjees services could not be said to amount to an act of victimisation or an unfair labour practice. Even so, it held that the discharge was not justified, and so, it,has directed the appellant to reinstate Mr. Banerjee. It is the validity of this order that is challenged before us by Mi. Setalvad on behalf of the appellant. The true legal position about the Industrial Courts jurisdiction and authority in dealing with cases of this kind is no longer in doubt. It is true that in several cases, contract of employment or provisions in Standing Orders authorise an industrial employer to terminate the service, of his employees. after giving notice for one month or paying salary for one month in lieu of notice, and normally, an employer may, in a proper case, -be entitled to exercise the said power. But where an order of discharge passed by an employer gives rise to an industrial dispute. the form of the order by which the employees services are terminated, would not be decisive industrial adjudication would be entitled to examine the substance of the matter and decide whether the termination is in fact discharge simpli- citer or it amounts to dismissal which has put on the cloak of a discharge simpliciter. If the Industrial Court is satisfied that the order of discharge is punitive, that it is malafide, or that it amounts to victimisation or unfair labour practice, it is competent to the Industrial Court to set aside the order and in a proper case, direct the reinstatement of the employee. \nIn some cases, the termination of the employees services may appear to the Industrial Court to be capricious or so unreasonably severe that an inherence may legitimately and reasonably be drawn that in terminating the services, the employer was not acting bonafide. The test always has to be whether the act of the employer is bonafide or not. If the act is malafide, or appears to be a colourable exercise of the powers conferred on the employer either by the terms of contract or by the standing orders, then notwithstanding the form of the order, industrial adjudication would examine the substance and would direct reinstatement in a fit case.\nIn the present case, the Labour Court has made a definite finding in favour of -the appellant that its action in terminating the services of Mr. Banerjee was not malafide and did not amount to victimisation. Even so, it proceeded to examine the propriety of the said action and came to the conclusion that Mr. Banerjees discharge from employment did not appear to it to be justified. In coming to this conclusion, the Labour Court has given some reasons which are clearly unsupportable. It has observed, for instance, that the appellant has not produced any documentary evidence in support of its allegation against the efficiency of Mr. Banerjee. This is clearly wrong because the two reports made by Mr. Gupta in respect of Mr. Banerjees conduct do amount to documentary evidence which cannot be lightly brushed aside. It has then commented on the fact that the allegations made by Mr. Gupta against Mr. Banerjee on six counts are of a general character. This comment again cannot be justified because Mr. Gupta stated in clear terms the defects in Mr. Banerjees work which had come to his notice. These defects are specific and it is idle to refuse to give importance to this evidence merely on the ground that no specific instances had been cited.\nIn regard .to the question as to whether the 20 boxes had been opened by Mr. Banerjee before he made his report (1) (1951) 11 L.L J. 314. (2) (1960) 11 L.L.J. 221. (3) (1962)1 L.L J. 374. to the Zonal ice, the Labour Court has observed that on this point there is the evidence of Mr. Banerjee against that of Mr. Gupta and there was no particular reason to believe one in preference to the other. Now, it is clear that such an -observation is hardly of any help because it was necessary for the Labour Court to express its conclusion on this point it might have believed either Mr. Banerjee or Mr. Gupta, but by saying that there is no reason why one should be believed rather than the other, the Labour Court left this part of the dispute entirely undecided. Similarly, the Labour Court has accepted the fact that Mr. Gupta that called for and received Mr. Banerjees explanation and to that extent it has rejected Mr. Banerjee suggestion that he had not given any explanation a all but even so, the Labour Court has not considered the effect of this conclusion on the main controversy between the parties.\nIn our opinion, therefore, the-reasons given by the Labour Court in support of its conclusion that the discharge of Mr. Banerjee was not justified are wholly unsatisfactory and so, it has become necessary for us to examine the evidence ourselves.\nThe first report made by Mr. Gupta expressly states six grounds on which Mr. Banerjees work was found to be unsatisfactory. Mr. Gupta took the view that Mr. Banerjee was very slow in his work as a Salesman, that he was not able to judge the capacity of the dealers and to give them sufficient stocks in time, that he took no steps to put the products of the appellant on prominent view in the dealers shops, that he wag not looking after the pasting of the posters, in fact in one place the poster was pasted upside down, that he was not educating the stockists and dealers as he could have done and that he was reluctant to put hard and intelligent work.\nIt is remarkable that when Mr. Banerjee was asked about this report in cross-examination, he frankly stated that Mr. Gupta was not unfriendly towards him and he was really unable to say why Mr. Gupta should have made these adverse comments against his work. In fact, the Labour Court itself has found that the appellant was not actuated by any ulterior considerations in discharging Mr. Banerjee. This report was made by Mr. Gupta soon after he inspected Mc. Banerjees work and there is no reason, whatever, why the Labour Court should have been reluctant to accept this report. Confining ourselves to the main complaint against Mr. Banerjee that he had not examined even a single box before he reported that the contents of the said boxes were not marketable, Mr. Gupta expressly stated that he had seen the 20 boxes and found that none of them had been opened at all. They were intact in the companys packing with the straps on them. Mr Gupta got them opened and found that the contents to the extent of 5 cases were really damaged and that the remaining contents were alright and could be marketed at the companys prices.\nMr. Banerjee stated in his evidence that he had all the cases opened and he added, as he. had to, that the said cases were repacked for avoiding further deterioration. When he\nwas asked how that could be done, he agreed that the metal straps had to be removed for opening of the boxes, but he added that he had arranged to have them restrapped and nailed. It is clear that the strapping is done in a factory by machines. Mr. Banerjee, however, suggested that he could manage to get the straps put and nailed with hands. \nThis evidence is patently unreliable.\nBesides, it is significant that when he gave his explanation to Mr. Gupta Mr. Banerjee admitted that he had opened only 5 or 6 out of the 20 boxes in question though his report suggested that he had opened all the 20 boxes.\nTherefore, there can be no doubt that Mr. Guptas statetment is absolutely true and that Mr. Banerjee had made his report about the unsatisfactory condition of the contents of the 20 boxes without as much as opening any one of them. That being so, it is difficult to understand how the Labour Court could -have come to the conclusion that the order of discharge was not justified.\nWe do not think that having regard to the evidence given by Mr. Gupta and Mr. Banerjee and the explanation offered by the latter when he was called to Calcutta by Mr. Gupta, there is any room for such an ingenious suggestion. Both parties knew that they were talking about the same 20 boxes and so,, it is futile now to suggest that the 20 boxes which Mr. Gupta examined were different from the boxes in respect of which Mr. Banerjee had made his report.\nIt is true that when Mr. Gupta was asked about these letters, he said he did not remember if he had received them. We do not think that the answers given by Mr. Gupta in respect of these letters can be of any assistance to the respondents in discrediting Mr. Guptas evidence in any manner. On the whole, we have no hesitation in holding that the appellant acted bonafide in discharging Mr. Banerjees services when it accepted Mr. Guptas report and concurred with his conclusions that the explanation given by Mr. Banerjee was not satisfactory.", + "expert_2": "Banerjee had been employed by the appellant, the Tata Oil Mills Co. Ltd.as a Salesman on April 3, 1956, as a probationer and he was confirmed on November 5, 1956. On December 5, 1959, his services were terminated and he was informed that the appellant had lost confidence in him, and so, it bad decided to discharge him. Accordingly, in lieu of notice, he was paid a months salary and was told that he ceased to be the employee of the appe- llant as from the date next after he received the order from the appellant.\nThe Labour Court which tried the dispute came to the conclusion that the appellant had failed to justify the discharge of Mr. Banerjee and so, it has directed the appellant to reinstate him and pay him full emoluments from the date of his discharge up to the date of his reinstatement. It is this order which is challenged by the appellant by its present appeal brought to this Court by special leave.\nThe appellant expected that as its Salesman Mr. Banerjee should visit dealers in his area and carry on intelligent and intensive propaganda to popularise the sale of the appellants products. The appellant has a Sales ice in Calcutta and the manager of the said ice visits the areas within his jurisdiction to inspect the work of Salesmen.\nThe appellant had alleged that the termination of Mr. Banerjees services was not dismissal but was a discharge simpliciter, and according to it, the discharge was justified by the terms of contract between the appellant and Mr. Banerjee as embodied in Rule 40 (1) of the Service Rules of -the appellant. The appellant, therefore, urged that the Labour Court had no jurisdiction to consider the propriety of the appellants action in discharging Mr. Banerjee.\nThe respondents, on the other hand, contended that the discharge was not discharge simpliciter but was, in substance, dismissal, and so, it was urged that the Labour Court was entitled to consider the propriety of the appellants action.\nThe Labour Court has found that according to the terms of contract under which Mr. Banerjee was employed by the appellant, the appellant was entitled to discharge Mr. Banerjee from its employment under Rule 40 (1) of the Service Rules but it held that merely because the order served on Mr. Banerjee purported to be an order of discharge, that would not exclude the jurisdiction of the Labour Court to examine the substance of the matter.\nthe Labour Court has found that the respondents plea about the mala fides of the appellant was not proved and it held that the termination of Mr. Banerjees services could not be said to amount to an act of victimisation or an unfair labour practice. Even so, it held that the discharge was not justified, and so, it,has directed the appellant to reinstate Mr. Banerjee. It is the validity of this order that is challenged before us by Mi. Setalvad on behalf of the appellant.\nBut where an order of discharge passed by an employer gives rise to an industrial dispute. the form of the order by which the employees services are terminated, would not be decisive industrial adjudication would be entitled to examine the substance of the matter and decide whether the termination is in fact discharge simpli- citer or it amounts to dismissal which has put on the cloak of a discharge simpliciter. If the Industrial Court is satisfied that the order of discharge is punitive, that it is malafide, or that it amounts to victimisation or unfair labour practice, it is competent to the Industrial Court to set aside the order and in a proper case, direct the reinstatement of the employee.\nIn coming to this conclusion, the Labour Court has given some reasons which are clearly unsupportable. It has observed, for instance, that the appellant has not produced any documentary evidence in support of its allegation against the efficiency of Mr. Banerjee. This is clearly wrong because the two reports made by Mr. Gupta in respect of Mr. Banerjees conduct do amount to documentary evidence which cannot be lightly brushed aside.\nthe Labour Court has accepted the fact that Mr. Gupta that called for and received Mr. Banerjees explanation and to that extent it has rejected Mr. Banerjee suggestion that he had not given any explanation a all but even so, the Labour Court has not considered the effect of this conclusion on the main controversy between the parties. \nIn our opinion, therefore, the-reasons given by the Labour Court in support of its conclusion that the discharge of Mr. Banerjee was not justified are wholly unsatisfactory and so, it has become necessary for us to examine the evidence ourselves.\nGupta took the view that Mr. Banerjee was very slow in his work as a Salesman, that he was not able to judge the capacity of the dealers and to give them sufficient stocks in time, that he took no steps to put the products of the appellant on prominent view in the dealers shops, that he wag not looking after the pasting of the posters, in fact in one place the poster was pasted upside down, that he was not educating the stockists and dealers as he could have done and that he was reluctant to put hard and intelligent work.\nBanerjee that he had not examined even a single box before he reported that the contents of the said boxes were not marketable, Mr. Gupta expressly stated that he had seen the 20 boxes and found that none of them had been opened at all. They were intact in the companys packing with the straps on them. Mr Gupta got them opened and found that the contents to the extent of 5 cases were really damaged and that the remaining contents were alright and could be marketed at the companys prices.", + "expert_3": "R. K. Banerjee had been employed by the appellant, the Tata Oil Mills Co. Ltd.as a Salesman on April 3, 1956, as a probationer and he was confirmed on November 5, 1956\nOn December 5, 1959, his services were terminated and he was informed that the appellant had lost confidence in him, and so, it bad decided to discharge him.\nAccordingly, in lieu of notice, he was paid a months salary and was told that he ceased to be the employee of the appe- llant as from the date next after he received the order from the appellant. \nThe discharge of Mr. Banerjee was resented by the Union to which he belonged and the Union took up his case\nSince the dispute could not be settled amicably, the Union succeeded in persuading the Government of West Bengal to refer the dispute for adjudication to the Second Labour Court on the ground that the said discharge was not justified. That is how the discharge of Mr.\nBanerjee became an industrial dispute between the appellant and the respondents, its workmen represented by their Union\nThe Labour Court which tried the dispute came to the conclusion that the appellant had failed to justify the discharge of Mr. Banerjee and so, it has directed the appellant to reinstate him and pay him full emoluments from the date of his discharge up to the date of his reinstatement. It is this order which is challenged by the appellant by its present appeal brought to this Court by special leave\nBanerjees services lie within a very narrow compass. in November, 1959 Mr. Banerjee was working in the Assam area and as such, had to work as a Salesman at Dhubri, Bongaigoan, Rangia and Tejpur. The appellant expected that as its Salesman Mr. Banerjee should visit dealers in his area and carry on intelligent and intensive propaganda to popularise the sale of the appellants products. The appellant has a Sales ice in Calcutta and the manager of the said ice visits the areas within his jurisdiction to inspect the work of Salesmen.\nAccordingly Mr. Gupta who was then the manager of the Calcutta ice visited the area assigned to Mr. Banerjee, in the last week of October. He found that Mr. Banerjee was networking satisfactorily as a Salesman\nIn particular, he noticed that whereas Mr. Banerjee had reported to the ice that the Bongaigoan Stockists had 20 boxes of dried up and deshaped 501 Special Soap which could not be distributed in the market he had in fact not opened a single box and had not cared to satisfy himself that the soaps had either dried up or had been deshaped. In fact, Mr. Gupta found that the boxes were intact and he opened them and discovered that five boxes contained soap which had dried up and had become deshaped, whereas the 15 other boxes were in good condition\nThereupon, Mr. Gupta made a report to the zonal Manager on November 2, 1959, adversely commenting on Mr. Banerjees work. The said report was in due course forwarded to the Head ice in Bombay. The Head ice then instructed the Calcutta Sales ice by telephone to send for Mr. Banerjee and call for his explanation\nAccordingly, Mr. Banerjee was sent for and his explanation taken Mr. Gupta then made another report expressing his dissatisfaction with the explanation given by Mr. Banerjee\nThis report was sent on November 24, 1959. The Head ice accepted this report and on December 5, 1959, issued to Mr, Banerjee the order terminating his services. That, in brief, is the case set out by the appellant in support of the action taken by it against Mr. Banerjee\nThe appellant had alleged that the termination of Mr. Banerjees services was not dismissal but was a discharge simpliciter, and according to it, the discharge was justified by the terms of contract between the appellant and Mr. Banerjee as embodied in Rule 40 (1) of the Service Rules of -the appellant. The appellant, therefore, urged that the Labour Court had no jurisdiction to consider the propriety of the appellants action in discharging Mr. Banerjee. The respondents, on the other hand, contended that the discharge was not discharge simpliciter but was, in substance, dismissal, and so, it was urged that the Labour Court was entitled to consider the propriety of the appellants action\nBasing themselves on the plea that the discharge amounted to dismissal, the respondents pleaded that the failure of the appellant to hold an enquiry against Mr. Banerjee introduced a serious infirmity in the order passed against him and they argued that the conduct of the appellant was malafide and the dismissal of Mr. Banerjee amounted to victimisation\nThe Labour Court has found that according to the terms of contract under which Mr. Banerjee was employed by the appellant, the appellant was entitled to discharge Mr\nBanerjee from its employment under Rule 40 (1) of the Service Rules but it held that merely because the order served on Mr. Banerjee purported to be an order of discharge, that would not exclude the jurisdiction of the Labour Court to examine the substance of the matter. In fact, Mr. joshi who appeared for the appellant conceded before the Labour Court that an adjudicating Court can look into the reasons behind the discharge of an employee\nThat is why evidence was led by- both the parties before the Labour Court. Having considered that evidence, the Labour Court has found that the respondents plea about the mala fides of the appellant was not proved and it held that the termination of Mr.\nBanerjees services could not be said to amount to an act of victimisation or an unfair labour practice. Even so, it held that the discharge was not justified, and so, it,has directed the appellant to reinstate Mr. Banerjee\nIt is the validity of this order that is challenged before us\nIt is true that in several cases, contract of employment or provisions in Standing Orders authorise an industrial employer to terminate the service, of his employees. after giving notice for one month or paying salary for one month in lieu of notice, and normally, an employer may, in a proper case, -be entitled to exercise the said power. But where an order of discharge passed by an employer gives rise to an industrial dispute. the form of the order by which the employees services are terminated, would not be decisive industrial adjudication would be entitled to examine the substance of the matter and decide whether the termination is in fact discharge simpli- citer or it amounts to dismissal which has put on the cloak of a discharge simpliciter.\nIf the Industrial Court is satisfied that the order of discharge is punitive, that it is malafide, or that it amounts to victimisation or unfair labour practice, it is competent to the Industrial Court to set aside the order and in a proper case, direct the reinstatement of the employee. \nIn some cases, the termination of the employees services may appear to the Industrial Court to be capricious or so unreasonably severe that an inherence may legitimately and reasonably be drawn that in terminating the services, the employer was not acting bonafide. The test always has to be whether the act of the employer is bonafide or not. If the act is malafide, or appears to be a colourable exercise of the powers conferred on the employer either by the terms of contract or by the standing orders, then notwithstanding the form of the order, industrial adjudication would examine the substance and would direct reinstatement in a fit case\nIn the present case, the Labour Court has made a definite finding in favour of -the appellant that its action in terminating the services of Mr. Banerjee was not malafide and did not amount to victimisation.\nEven so, it proceeded to examine the propriety of the said action and came to the conclusion that Mr. Banerjees discharge from employment did not appear to it to be justified. In coming to this conclusion, the Labour Court has given some reasons which are clearly unsupportable\nIt has observed, for instance, that the appellant has not produced any documentary evidence in support of its allegation against the efficiency of Mr. Banerjee. This is clearly wrong because the two reports made by Mr. Gupta in respect of Mr. Banerjees conduct do amount to documentary evidence which cannot be lightly brushed aside. It has then commented on the fact that the allegations made by Mr. Gupta against Mr\nBanerjee on six counts are of a general character. This comment again cannot be justified because Mr. Gupta stated in clear terms the defects in Mr\nBanerjees work which had come to his notice. These defects are specific and it is idle to refuse to give importance to this evidence merely on the ground that no specific instances had been cited.\nIn regard .to the question as to whether the 20 boxes had been opened by Mr. Banerjee before he made his report (1) (1951) 11 L.L J. 314. (2) (1960) 11 L.L.J. 221. (3) (1962)1 L.L J. 374. to the Zonal ice, the Labour Court has observed that on this point there is the evidence of Mr. Banerjee against that of Mr.\nGupta and there was no particular reason to believe one in preference to the other. Now, it is clear that such an -observation is hardly of any help because it was necessary for the Labour Court to express its conclusion on this point it might have believed either Mr.\nBanerjee or Mr. Gupta, but by saying that there is no reason why one should be believed rather than the other, the Labour Court left this part of the dispute entirely undecided.\nSimilarly, the Labour Court has accepted the fact that Mr. Gupta that called for and received Mr. Banerjees explanation and to that extent it has rejected Mr\nBanerjee suggestion that he had not given any explanation a all but even so, the Labour Court has not considered the effect of this conclusion on the main controversy between the parties. \nIn our opinion, therefore, the-reasons given by the Labour Court in support of its conclusion that the discharge of Mr.\nBanerjee was not justified are wholly unsatisfactory and so, it has become necessary for us to examine the evidence ourselves\nThe first report made by Mr. Gupta expressly states six grounds on which Mr. Banerjees work was found to be unsatisfactory\nMr. Gupta took the view that Mr. Banerjee was very slow in his work as a Salesman, that he was not able to judge the capacity of the dealers and to give them sufficient stocks in time, that he took no steps to put the products of the appellant on prominent view in the dealers shops, that he wag not looking after the pasting of the posters, in fact in one place the poster was pasted upside down, that he was not educating the stockists and dealers as he could have done and that he was reluctant to put hard and intelligent work\nIt is remarkable that when Mr. Banerjee was asked about this report in cross-examination, he frankly stated that Mr. Gupta was not unfriendly towards him and he was really unable to say why Mr. Gupta should have made these adverse comments against his work. In fact, the Labour Court itself has found that the appellant was not actuated by any ulterior considerations in discharging Mr. Banerjee.\nThis report was made by Mr. Gupta soon after he inspected Mc. Banerjees work and there is no reason, whatever, why the Labour Court should have been reluctant to accept this report.\nConfining ourselves to the main complaint against Mr. Banerjee that he had not examined even a single box before he reported that the contents of the said boxes were not marketable, Mr. Gupta expressly stated that he had seen the 20 boxes and found that none of them had been opened at all. They were intact in the companys packing with the straps on them. Mr Gupta got them opened and found that the contents to the extent of 5 cases were really damaged and that the remaining contents were alright and could be marketed at the companys prices.\nMr. Banerjee stated in his evidence that he had all the cases opened and he added, as he. had to, that the said cases were repacked for avoiding further deterioration. When he was asked how that could be done, he agreed that the metal straps had to be removed for opening of the boxes, but he added that he had arranged to have them restrapped and nailed. It is clear that the strapping is done in a factory by machines\nMr. Banerjee, however, suggested that he could manage to get the straps put and nailed with hands. \nThis evidence is patently unreliable\nBesides, it is significant that when he gave his explanation to Mr. Gupta Mr. Banerjee admitted that he had opened only 5 or 6 out of the 20 boxes in question though his report suggested that he had opened all the 20 boxes. Therefore, there can be no doubt that Mr. Guptas statetment is absolutely true and that Mr. Banerjee had made his report about the unsatisfactory condition of the contents of the 20 boxes without as much as opening any one of them. That being so, it is difficult to understand how the Labour Court could -have come to the conclusion that the order of discharge was not justified.\nBoth parties knew that they were talking about the same 20 boxes and so,, it is futile now to suggest that the 20 boxes which Mr. Gupta examined were different from the boxes in respect of which Mr. Banerjee had made his report\nIt is true that when Mr. Gupta was asked about these letters, he said he did not remember if he had received them. We do not think that the answers given by Mr. Gupta in respect of these letters can be of any assistance to the respondents in discrediting Mr\nGuptas evidence in any manner\nOn the whole, we have no hesitation in holding that the appellant acted bonafide in discharging Mr. Banerjees services when it accepted Mr. Guptas report and concurred with his conclusions that the explanation given by Mr. Banerjee was not satisfactory", + "expert_4": "Banerjee had been employed by the appellant, the Tata Oil Mills Co. Ltd.as a Salesman on April 3, 1956, as a probationer and he was confirmed on November 5, 1956. On December 5, 1959, his services were terminated and he was informed that the appellant had lost confidence in him, and so, it bad decided to discharge him. Accordingly, in lieu of notice, he was paid a months salary and was told that he ceased to be the employee of the appe- llant as from the date next after he received the order from the appellant. \nThe discharge of Mr. Banerjee was resented by the Union to which he belonged and the Union took up his case. Since the dispute could not be settled amicably, the Union succeeded in persuading the Government of West Bengal to refer the dispute for adjudication to the Second Labour Court on the ground that the said discharge was not justified.\nThat is how the discharge of Mr. Banerjee became an industrial dispute between the appellant and the respondents, its workmen represented by their Union. The Labour Court which tried the dispute came to the conclusion that the appellant had failed to justify the discharge of Mr. Banerjee and so, it has directed the appellant to reinstate him and pay him full emoluments from the date of his discharge up to the date of his reinstatement. It is this order which is challenged by the appellant by its present appeal brought to this Court by special leave. The material facts leading to the termination of Mr. Banerjees services lie within a very narrow compass. in November, 1959 Mr.\nIt is this order which is challenged by the appellant by its present appeal brought to this Court by special leave.\nBanerjee was working in the Assam area and as such, had to work as a Salesman at Dhubri, Bongaigoan, Rangia and Tejpur. The appellant expected that as its Salesman Mr. Banerjee should visit dealers in his area and carry on intelligent and intensive propaganda to popularise the sale of the appellants products. The appellant has a Sales ice in Calcutta and the manager of the said ice visits the areas within his jurisdiction to inspect the work of Salesmen. \nAccordingly Mr. Gupta who was then the manager of the Calcutta ice visited the area assigned to Mr. Banerjee, in the last week of October\nBanerjee was networking satisfactorily as a Salesman. In particular, he noticed that whereas Mr. Banerjee had reported to the ice that the Bongaigoan Stockists had 20 boxes of dried up and deshaped 501 Special Soap which could not be distributed in the market he had in fact not opened a single box and had not cared to satisfy himself that the soaps had either dried up or had been deshaped.\nBanerjees work. The said report was in due course forwarded to the Head ice in Bombay. The Head ice then instructed the Calcutta Sales ice by telephone to send for Mr. Banerjee and call for his explanation. Accordingly, Mr. Banerjee was sent for and his explanation taken Mr. Gupta then made another report expressing his dissatisfaction with the explanation given by Mr.\nBanerjee. This report was sent on November 24, 1959. The Head ice accepted this report and on December 5, 1959, issued to Mr, Banerjee the order terminating his services. That, in brief, is the case set out by the appellant in support of the action taken by it against Mr. Banerjee. The appellant had alleged that the termination of Mr.\nBanerjees services was not dismissal but was a discharge simpliciter, and according to it, the discharge was justified by the terms of contract between the appellant and Mr. Banerjee as embodied in Rule 40 (1) of the Service Rules of -the appellant.\nThe appellant, therefore, urged that the Labour Court had no jurisdiction to consider the propriety of the appellants action in discharging Mr. Banerjee.\nThe respondents, on the other hand, contended that the discharge was not discharge simpliciter but was, in substance, dismissal, and so, it was urged that the Labour Court was entitled to consider the propriety of the appellants action.\nBasing themselves on the plea that the discharge amounted to dismissal, the respondents pleaded that the failure of the appellant to hold an enquiry against Mr. Banerjee introduced a serious infirmity in the order passed against him and they argued that the conduct of the appellant was malafide and the dismissal of Mr. Banerjee amounted to victimisation.\nThe Labour Court has found that according to the terms of contract under which Mr.\nBanerjee was employed by the appellant, the appellant was entitled to discharge Mr. Banerjee from its employment under Rule 40 (1) of the Service Rules but it held that merely because the order served on Mr. Banerjee purported to be an order of discharge, that would not exclude the jurisdiction of the Labour Court to examine the substance of the matter.\nIn fact, Mr. joshi who appeared for the appellant conceded before the Labour Court that an adjudicating Court can look into the reasons behind the discharge of an employee.\nHaving considered that evidence, the Labour Court has found that the respondents plea about the mala fides of the appellant was not proved and it held that the termination of Mr. Banerjees services could not be said to amount to an act of victimisation or an unfair labour practice.\nEven so, it held that the discharge was not justified, and so, it,has directed the appellant to reinstate Mr. Banerjee.\nIt is the validity of this order that is challenged before us by\nThe true legal position about the Industrial Courts jurisdiction and authority in dealing with cases of this kind is no longer in doubt. It is true that in several cases, contract of employment or provisions in Standing Orders authorise an industrial employer to terminate the service, of his employees. after giving notice for one month or paying salary for one month in lieu of notice, and normally, an employer may, in a proper case, -be entitled to exercise the said power.\nBut where an order of discharge passed by an employer gives rise to an industrial dispute. the form of the order by which the employees services are terminated, would not be decisive industrial adjudication would be entitled to examine the substance of the matter and decide whether the termination is in fact discharge simpli- citer or it amounts to dismissal which has put on the cloak of a discharge simpliciter. If the Industrial Court is satisfied that the order of discharge is punitive, that it is malafide, or that it amounts to victimisation or unfair labour practice, it is competent to the Industrial Court to set aside the order and in a proper case, direct the reinstatement of the employee.\nIn some cases, the termination of the employees services may appear to the Industrial Court to be capricious or so unreasonably severe that an inherence may legitimately and reasonably be drawn that in terminating the services, the employer was not acting bonafide. The test always has to be whether the act of the employer is bonafide or not.\nIf the act is malafide, or appears to be a colourable exercise of the powers conferred on the employer either by the terms of contract or by the standing orders, then notwithstanding the form of the order, industrial adjudication would examine the substance and would direct reinstatement in a fit case. This position was recognised by the Labour Appellate Tribunal as early as 1951 in Buckingham and Carnatic Co.\nWorkers of the Company, (1), and since then, it has been consistently followed vide Chartered Bank, Bombay, v.\nIn the present case, the Labour Court has made a definite finding in favour of -the appellant that its action in terminating the services of Mr.\nBanerjee was not malafide and did not amount to victimisation. Even so, it proceeded to examine the propriety of the said action and came to the conclusion that Mr. Banerjees discharge from employment did not appear to it to be justified.\nIn coming to this conclusion, the Labour Court has given some reasons which are clearly unsupportable.\nIt has observed, for instance, that the appellant has not produced any documentary evidence in support of its allegation against the efficiency of Mr. Banerjee. This is clearly wrong because the two reports made by Mr.\nGupta in respect of Mr.\nBanerjees conduct do amount to documentary evidence which cannot be lightly brushed aside. It has then commented on the fact that the allegations made by Mr. Gupta against Mr. Banerjee on six counts are of a general character.\nThis comment again cannot be justified because Mr. Gupta stated in clear terms the defects in Mr. Banerjees work which had come to his notice.\nThese defects are specific and it is idle to refuse to give importance to this evidence merely on the ground that no specific instances had been cited.\nIn regard .to the question as to whether the 20 boxes had been opened by Mr. Banerjee before he made his report (1) (1951) 11 L.L J. 314. (2) (1960) 11 L.L.J. 221. (3) (1962)1 L.L J. 374. to the Zonal ice, the Labour Court has observed that on this point there is the evidence of Mr. Banerjee against that of Mr.\nGupta and there was no particular reason to believe one in preference to the other.\nNow, it is clear that such an -observation is hardly of any help because it was necessary for the Labour Court to express its conclusion on this point it might have believed either Mr. Banerjee or Mr. Gupta, but by saying that there is no reason why one should be believed rather than the other, the Labour Court left this part of the dispute entirely undecided.\nSimilarly, the Labour Court has accepted the fact that Mr.\nGupta that called for and received Mr. Banerjees explanation and to that extent it has rejected Mr. Banerjee suggestion that he had not given any explanation a all but even so, the Labour Court has not considered the effect of this conclusion on the main controversy between the parties.\nIn our opinion, therefore, the-reasons given by the Labour Court in support of its conclusion that the discharge of Mr.\nBanerjee was not justified are wholly unsatisfactory and so, it has become necessary for us to examine the evidence ourselves.\nThe first report made by Mr. Gupta expressly states six grounds on which Mr. Banerjees work was found to be unsatisfactory.\nBanerjee was asked about this report in cross-examination, he frankly stated that Mr. Gupta was not unfriendly towards him and he was really unable to say why Mr. Gupta should have made these adverse comments against his work. In fact, the Labour Court itself has found that the appellant was not actuated by any ulterior considerations in discharging Mr. Banerjee. This report was made by Mr. Gupta soon after he inspected Mc.\nIn fact, the Labour Court itself has found that the appellant was not actuated by any ulterior considerations in discharging Mr.\nGupta expressly stated that he had seen the 20 boxes and found that none of them had been opened at all. They were intact in the companys packing with the straps on them. Mr Gupta got them opened and found that the contents to the extent of 5 cases were really damaged and that the remaining contents were alright and could be marketed at the companys prices. Mr. Banerjee stated in his evidence that he had all the cases opened and he added, as he. had to, that the said cases were repacked for avoiding further deterioration. When he was asked how that could be done, he agreed that the metal straps had to be removed for opening of the boxes, but he added that he had arranged to have them restrapped and nailed. It is clear that the strapping is done in a factory by machines.\nMr. Banerjee, however, suggested that he could manage to get the straps put and nailed with hands.\nThis evidence is patently unreliable.\nBesides, it is significant that when he gave his explanation to Mr. Gupta Mr. Banerjee admitted that he had opened only 5 or 6 out of the 20 boxes in question though his report suggested that he had opened all the 20 boxes.\nTherefore, there can be no doubt that Mr.\nGuptas statetment is absolutely true and that Mr. Banerjee had made his report about the unsatisfactory condition of the contents of the 20 boxes without as much as opening any one of them.\nThat being so, it is difficult to understand how the Labour Court could -have come to the conclusion that the order of discharge was not justified. The learned Solicitor-General, however, attempted to argue that there was nothing on the record to show that the 20 boxes which Mr.\nGupta got opened were the same boxes in respect of which Mr. Banerjee had made his report.\nWe do not think that having regard to the evidence given by Mr. Gupta and Mr.\nBanerjee and the explanation offered by the latter when he was called to Calcutta by Mr. Gupta, there is any room for such an ingenious suggestion.\nBoth parties knew that they were talking about the same 20 boxes and so,, it is futile now to suggest that the 20 boxes which Mr. Gupta examined were different from the boxes in respect of which Mr.\nBanerjee had made his report. It was also suggested on behalf of the respondents that Mr.\nGupta did not admit that he had received some letters from Mr. Banerjee in which he had complained that owing to heavy rains, conditions were not favourable for effective work in the area entrusted to him.\nIt is true that when Mr. Gupta was asked about these letters, he said he did not remember if he had received them.\nWe do not think that the answers given by Mr. Gupta in respect of these letters can be of any assistance to the respondents in discrediting Mr.\nGuptas evidence in any manner. On the whole, we have no hesitation in holding that the appellant acted bonafide in discharging Mr.\nBanerjees services when it accepted Mr. Guptas report and concurred with his conclusions that the explanation given by Mr.\nBanerjee was not satisfactory.", + "expert_5": "Banerjee should visit dealers in his area and carry on intelligent and intensive propaganda to popularise the sale of the appellants products.\nwhereas Mr. Banerjee had reported to the ice that the Bongaigoan Stockists had 20 boxes of dried up and deshaped 501 Special Soap which could not be distributed in the market he had in fact not opened a single box and had not cared to satisfy himself that the soaps had either dried up or had been deshaped. In fact, Mr. Gupta found that the boxes were intact and he opened them and discovered that five boxes contained soap which had dried up and had become deshaped, whereas the 15 other boxes were in good condition.\nGupta made a report to the zonal Manager\nMr. Gupta then made another report expressing his dissatisfaction with the explanation given by Mr. Banerjee.\nHaving considered that evidence, the Labour Court has found that the respondents plea about the mala fides of the appellant was not proved and it held that the termination of Mr. Banerjees services could not be said to amount to an act of victimisation or an unfair labour practice.\nIf the Industrial Court is satisfied that the order of discharge is punitive, that it is malafide, or that it amounts to victimisation or unfair labour practice, it is competent to the Industrial Court to set aside the order and in a proper case, direct the reinstatement of the employee.\npunitive, that it is malafide, or that it amounts to victimisation or unfair labour practice\nThe test always has to be whether the act of the employer is bonafide or not.\nIf the act is malafide, or appears to be a colourable exercise of the powers conferred on the employer either by the terms of contract or by the standing orders, then notwithstanding the form of the order, industrial adjudication would examine the substance and would direct reinstatement in a fit case.\nThis position was recognised by the Labour Appellate Tribunal as early as 1951 in Buckingham and Carnatic Co. Ltd., v. Workers of the Company, (1), and since then, it has been consistently followed vide Chartered Bank, Bombay, v. Chartered Bank Employees Union (2) , and U. B. Dutt Co. (Private) Ltd. v. Its Workmen (3).\nIn the present case, the Labour Court has made a definite finding in favour of -the appellant that its action in terminating the services of Mr. Banerjee was not malafide and did not amount to victimisation.\nEven so, it proceeded to examine the propriety of the said action and came to the conclusion that Mr. Banerjees discharge from employment did not appear to it to be justified. In coming to this conclusion, the Labour Court has given some reasons which are clearly unsupportable.\nthe two reports made by Mr. Gupta in respect of Mr. Banerjees conduct do amount to documentary evidence which cannot be lightly brushed aside.\nMr. Gupta stated in clear terms the defects in Mr. Banerjees work which had come to his notice. These defects are specific and it is idle to refuse to give importance to this evidence merely on the ground that no specific instances had been cited.\nNow, it is clear that such an -observation is hardly of any help because it was necessary for the Labour Court to express its conclusion on this point it might have believed either Mr. Banerjee or Mr. Gupta, but by saying that there is no reason why one should be believed rather than the other, the Labour Court left this part of the dispute entirely undecided.\nthe-reasons given by the Labour Court in support of its conclusion that the discharge of Mr. Banerjee was not justified are wholly unsatisfactory\nThe first report made by Mr. Gupta expressly states six grounds on which Mr. Banerjees work was found to be unsatisfactory.\nMr. Banerjee was very slow in his work as a Salesman, that he was not able to judge the capacity of the dealers and to give them sufficient stocks in time, that he took no steps to put the products of the appellant on prominent view in the dealers shops, that he wag not looking after the pasting of the posters, in fact in one place the poster was pasted upside down, that he was not educating the stockists and dealers as he could have done and that he was reluctant to put hard and intelligent work.\nwhen Mr. Banerjee was asked about this report in cross-examination, he frankly stated that Mr. Gupta was not unfriendly towards him\nLabour Court itself has found that the appellant was not actuated by any ulterior considerations in discharging Mr. Banerjee.\nthere is no reason, whatever, why the Labour Court should have been reluctant to accept this report.\nMr. Gupta expressly stated that he had seen the 20 boxes and found that none of them had been opened at all. They were intact in the companys packing with the straps on them. Mr Gupta got them opened and found that the contents to the extent of 5 cases were really damaged and that the remaining contents were alright and could be marketed at the companys prices.\nIt is clear that the strapping is done in a factory by machines. Mr. Banerjee, however, suggested that he could manage to get the straps put and nailed with hands. \nThis evidence is patently unreliable.\nwhen he gave his explanation to Mr. Gupta Mr. Banerjee admitted that he had opened only 5 or 6 out of the 20 boxes in question though his report suggested that he had opened all the 20 boxes.\nthere can be no doubt that Mr. Guptas statetment is absolutely true and that Mr. Banerjee had made his report about the unsatisfactory condition of the contents of the 20 boxes without as much as opening any one of them.\nBoth parties knew that they were talking about the same 20 boxes and so,, it is futile now to suggest that the 20 boxes which Mr. Gupta examined were different from the boxes in respect of which Mr. Banerjee had made his report.\nwe have no hesitation in holding that the appellant acted bonafide in discharging Mr. Banerjees services when it accepted Mr. Guptas report and concurred with his conclusions that the explanation given by Mr. Banerjee was not satisfactory." + }, + "1999_1001": { + "expert_1": "By the impugned order the High Court noted that Respondent I had been empanelled for promotion to the post of Joint Commissioner on 28 5 1998 and the disciplinary proceedings commenced on 28 7 1998 and on the same day i.e 28 7 1998 he was suspended. From this the High Court concluded that the act of suspension was an after thought. Consequently the High Court directed that no effect should be given to the order of suspension and the select list for promotion should be given effect to forthwith.\nEven if before that date the said respondent had been empanelled for promotion the Government cannot be prohibited from starting disciplinary proceedings if there are reasons for doing so. The High Court has not quashed the disciplinary proceedings and looking at the charges leveled against the respondent it cant of be said that there was any ulterior motive for the respondent being put under suspension. Furthermore where disciplinary proceedings are pending we are doubtful whether it was appropriate for the High Court to have directed that the select list for promotion should be given effect to forthwith especially when the High Court in the said order has permitted the disciplinary proceedings to continue.", + "expert_2": "Respondent I had been empanelled for promotion to the post of Joint Commissioner on 28 5 1998 and the disciplinary proceedings commenced on 28 7 1998 and on the same day i.e 28 7 1998 he was suspended. From this the High Court concluded that the act of suspension was an after thought.\nthe High Court directed that no effect should be given to the order of suspension\nselect list for promotion should be given effect to forthwith.\nThe High Court has not quashed the disciplinary proceedings and looking at the charges leveled against the respondent it cant of be said that there was any ulterior motive for the respondent being put under suspension.", + "expert_3": "Respondent 1 was suspended by order dated 28 7 1998 on the same day when disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him\nHe filed a writ petition in the High Court challenging the order of suspension.\nthe High Court noted that Respondent I had been empanelled for promotion to the post of Joint Commissioner on 28 5 1998 and the disciplinary proceedings commenced on 28 7 1998 and on the same day i.e 28 7 1998 he was suspended. From this the High Court concluded that the act of suspension was an after thought\nConsequently the High Court directed that no effect should be given to the order of suspension and the select list for promotion should be given effect to forthwith.\nEven if before that date the said respondent had been empanelled for promotion the Government cannot be prohibited from starting disciplinary proceedings if there are reasons for doing so.\nwhere disciplinary proceedings are pending we are doubtful whether it was appropriate for the High Court to have directed that the select list for promotion should be given effect to forthwith especially when the High Court in the said order has permitted the disciplinary proceedings to continue\nThe effect of this would be that Respondent 1 who was reinstated pursuant to an order passed by the High Court during the proceedings for contempt which are stated to have been initiated by the respondent would be placed under suspension forthwith till the conclusion of the disciplinary proceedings or the withdrawal of the suspension order by the Government.", + "expert_4": "By the impugned order the High Court noted that Respondent I had been empanelled for promotion to the post of Joint Commissioner on 28 5 1998 and the disciplinary proceedings commenced on 28 7 1998 and on the same day i.e 28 7 1998 he was suspended.\nFrom this the High Court concluded that the act of suspension was an after thought\nAdmittedly the disciplinary proceedings had commenced on 28 7 1998.\nNo reasons for coming to this conclusion have been given.", + "expert_5": "High Court has not quashed the disciplinary proceedings\nlooking at the charges leveled against the respondent it cant of be said that there was any ulterior motive for the respondent being put under suspension\nwhere disciplinary proceedings are pending we are doubtful whether it was appropriate for the High Court to have directed that the select list for promotion should be given effect to forthwith especially when the High Court in the said order has permitted the disciplinary proceedings to continue\nIt is also difficult to appreciate the High Court holding that even though disciplinary proceedings could continue but no final order should be passed. No reasons for coming to this conclusion have been given." + }, + "2003_794": { + "expert_1": "An Industrial unit run by M s. Diamond Marbles Pvt. Ltd respondent No 4 was brought to sale in terms of Section 29 of the State Financial Corporation Act 1951 for short the State Act by Rajasthan Financial Corporation respondent No 3.\nAppellant before us participated in auction and its bid having been accepted took possession of the said unit on 28 8 1987 pursuant to the agreement entered into between them.\nOn 4 12 1987 the Additional Collector of Central Excise adjudicated in a proceeding arising out of show cause notice issued under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act to respondent No 4 in relation to certain goods that are said to have been removed between 13 8 1986 and 23 8 1986 and excise duty of Rs 1 04 586.17 and penalty of Rs 3 lakhs was levied and demanded.\nA letter was sent by the Central Excise Department to the appellant demanding a sum of Rs 4 07 291.75 pursuant to the adjudication order made against respondent No 4 The appellant in his letter to the Department contended that it had no liability to pay the excise dues of respondent No 4.\nThe Department not having acceded to it a writ petition was filed in the High Court challenging the recovery proceedings initiated by the Department.\nIn the writ petition several contentions were raised including the question that the liability is only that of respondent No 4 and not of the appellant that appellant having taken over the unit from the third respondent had no liability to pay the excise dues that Rule 230 2 of the Central Excise Rules 1944 has no application to the present case. The High Court disagreed with these submissions and took the view that in terms of the said Rule it is open to the Department to proceed against the plants and machinery of the owner from whom it was transferred and made it clear that it is open to the appellant to agitate against the erstwhile owner respondent No 3 but had to pay the dues to the Department and thereby dismissed the writ petition. Hence this appeal by special leave.\nIn this appeal Ms. Radha Rangaswamy learned Counsel for the appellant very strenuously contended that in view of Section 46B of the State Act it would prevail over the Central Excise Act and relied upon the decision of this Court in Sitani Textiles Fabrics P Ltd v. Asstt. C of Cus C.E Hyderabad 1999 106 E.L.T 296. She submitted that as the State Act is a special enactment and Central Excise Act is a general enactment the State Act would prevail over the same. It is brought to our notice that this aspect is under consideration in another matter before this Court.\nShe also relied upon the decision of this Court in Isha Marbles v Bihar State Electricity Board and Anr to contend that in case of sales effected under Section 29 1 of the State Act the recovery of dues of previous owner from the auction purchaser could not be made.\nNow taking the last contention first we may notice that this Court in Isha Marbles considered the scope of Section 24 of the Electricity Act and held that there is no charge over the property in question and when a premises comes to be owned or purchased by the auction purchaser he cannot be called upon to clear the past arrears when such purchaser seeks supply of electric energy or it is made clear in that decision that what matters is the contract entered into by the erstwhile consumer with the Board and the Board cannot seek the enforcement of contractual liability against the third party.\nTherefore this decision in Isha Marbles cannot be taken advantage of by the appellant at all in this case.\nSection 29 2 of the State Act makes it clear that the property pledged mortgaged hypothecated or assigned to the Financial Corporation can be brought to sale and such a sale if resulted in transfer of property shall vest in the successor all rights in the property transferred as if the transfer has been made by the owner of the property. When sale made by the corporation is deemed to be a sale made by the owner of the property necessarily Rule 230 2 of the Central Excise Rules would be attracted.", + "expert_2": "Appellant before us participated in auction and its bid having been accepted took possession of the said unit on 28 8 1987 pursuant to the agreement entered into between them.\nletter was sent by the Central Excise Department to the appellant demanding a sum of Rs 4 07 291.75 pursuant to the adjudication order made against respondent No 4 The appellant in his letter to the Department contended that it had no liability to pay the excise dues of respondent No 4.", + "expert_3": "An Industrial unit run by M s. Diamond Marbles Pvt. Ltd respondent No 4 was brought to sale in terms of Section 29 of the State Financial Corporation Act 1951 for short the State Act by Rajasthan Financial Corporation respondent No 3.\nAppellant before us participated in auction and its bid having been accepted took possession of the said unit on 28 8 1987 pursuant to the agreement entered into between them\nOn 4 12 1987 the Additional Collector of Central Excise adjudicated in a proceeding arising out of show cause notice issued under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act to respondent No 4 in relation to certain goods that are said to have been removed between 13 8 1986 and 23 8 1986 and excise duty of Rs 1 04 586.17 and penalty of Rs 3 lakhs was levied and demanded.\nA letter was sent by the Central Excise Department to the appellant demanding a sum of Rs 4 07 291.75 pursuant to the adjudication order made against respondent No 4\nThe appellant in his letter to the Department contended that it had no liability to pay the excise dues of respondent No 4. The Department not having acceded to it a writ petition was filed in the High Court challenging the recovery proceedings initiated by the Department.\nHowever the said amount was paid\nIn the writ petition several contentions were raised including the question that the liability is only that of respondent No 4 and not of the appellant that appellant having taken over the unit from the third respondent had no liability to pay the excise dues that Rule 230 2 of the Central Excise Rules 1944 has no application to the present case. The High Court disagreed with these submissions and took the view that in terms of the said Rule it is open to the Department to proceed against the plants and machinery of the owner from whom it was transferred and made it clear that it is open to the appellant to agitate against the erstwhile owner respondent No 3 but had to pay the dues to the Department and thereby dismissed the writ petition. Hence this appeal by special leave\nlearned Counsel for the appellant very strenuously contended that in view of Section 46B of the State Act it would prevail over the Central Excise Act and relied upon the decision of this Court in Sitani Textiles Fabrics P Ltd v. Asstt. C of Cus C.E Hyderabad\nShe submitted that as the State Act is a special enactment and Central Excise Act is a general enactment the State Act would prevail over the same.\nIt is also submitted that as held in N.B Sanjana Assistant Collector of Central Excise Bombay and Ors v. The Elphinstone Spinning and Weaving Mills Co. Ltd 1978 2 E.L.T J 399 the penalty was not attracted in the present case at all\nShe also relied upon the decision of this Court in Isha Marbles v Bihar State Electricity Board and Anr to contend that in case of sales effected under Section 29 1 of the State Act the recovery of dues of previous owner from the auction purchaser could not be made\nSection 29 2 of the State Act makes it clear that the property pledged mortgaged hypothecated or assigned to the Financial Corporation can be brought to sale and such a sale if resulted in transfer of property shall vest in the successor all rights in the property transferred as if the transfer has been made by the owner of the property\nWhen sale made by the corporation is deemed to be a sale made by the owner of the property necessarily Rule 230 2 of the Central Excise Rules would be attracted", + "expert_4": "An Industrial unit run by M s. Diamond Marbles Pvt. Ltd respondent No 4 was brought to sale in terms of Section 29 of the State Financial Corporation Act 1951 for short the State Act by Rajasthan Financial Corporation respondent No 3.\nOn 4 12 1987 the Additional Collector of Central Excise adjudicated in a proceeding arising out of show cause notice issued under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act to respondent No 4 in relation to certain goods that are said to have been removed between 13 8 1986 and 23 8 1986 and excise duty of Rs 1 04 586.17 and penalty of Rs 3 lakhs was levied and demanded.\nA letter was sent by the Central Excise Department to the appellant demanding a sum of Rs 4 07 291.75 pursuant to the adjudication order made against respondent No 4 The appellant in his letter to the Department contended that it had no liability to pay the excise dues of respondent No 4.\nThe Department not having acceded to it a writ petition was filed in the High Court challenging the recovery proceedings initiated by the Department.\nthe said amount was paid.\nIn the writ petition several contentions were raised including the question that the liability is only that of respondent No 4 and not of the appellant that appellant having taken over the unit from the third respondent had no liability to pay the excise dues that Rule 230 2 of the Central Excise Rules 1944 has no application to the present case.\nThe High Court disagreed with these submissions and took the view that in terms of the said Rule it is open to the Department to proceed against the plants and machinery of the owner from whom it was transferred and made it clear that it is open to the appellant to agitate against the erstwhile owner respondent No 3 but had to pay the dues to the Department and thereby dismissed the writ petition.\nRadha Rangaswamy learned Counsel for the appellant very strenuously contended that in view of Section 46B of the State Act it would prevail over the Central Excise Act and relied upon the decision of this Court in Sitani Textiles Fabrics P Ltd v. Asstt. C of Cus C.E Hyderabad 1999 106 E.L.T 296.\nShe submitted that as the State Act is a special enactment and Central Excise Act is a general enactment the State Act would prevail over the same.\nIt is brought to our notice that this aspect is under consideration in another matter before this Court. It is also submitted that as held in N.B Sanjana Assistant Collector of Central Excise Bombay and Ors v. The Elphinstone Spinning and Weaving Mills Co. Ltd 1978 2 E.L.T J 399 the penalty was not attracted in the present case at all.\nShe also relied upon the decision of this Court in Isha Marbles v Bihar State Electricity Board and Anr to contend that in case of sales effected under Section 29 1 of the State Act the recovery of dues of previous owner from the auction purchaser could not be made.\nNow taking the last contention first we may notice that this Court in Isha Marbles considered the scope of Section 24 of the Electricity Act and held that there is no charge over the property in question and when a premises comes to be owned or purchased by the auction purchaser he cannot be called upon to clear the past arrears when such purchaser seeks supply of electric energy or it is made clear in that decision that what matters is the contract entered into by the erstwhile consumer with the Board and the Board cannot seek the enforcement of contractual liability against the third party.\nthis decision in Isha Marbles cannot be taken advantage of by the appellant at all in this case.\nThe argument advanced by the appellant that sale having taken place under the State Act free of encumbrances and the transferor s rights or liabilities cannot be that of transferee does not hold good.\nSection 29 2 of the State Act makes it clear that the property pledged mortgaged hypothecated or assigned to the Financial Corporation can be brought to sale and such a sale if resulted in transfer of property shall vest in the successor all rights in the property transferred as if the transfer has been made by the owner of the property.\nWhen sale made by the corporation is deemed to be a sale made by the owner of the property necessarily Rule 230 2 of the Central Excise Rules would be attracted.\nWe are not impressed with the argument that the State Act is a special enactment and the same would prevail over the Central Excise Act. Each of them is a special enactment and unless in the operation of the same any conflict arises this aspect need not be examined.\nIn this case no such conflict arises between the corporation and the Excise Department.", + "expert_5": "this Court in Isha Marbles considered the scope of Section 24 of the Electricity Act and held that there is no charge over the property in question and when a premises comes to be owned or purchased by the auction purchaser he cannot be called upon to clear the past arrears when such purchaser seeks supply of electric energy or it is made clear in that decision that what matters is the contract entered into by the erstwhile consumer with the Board and the Board cannot seek the enforcement of contractual liability against the third party. Therefore this decision in Isha Marbles cannot be taken advantage of by the appellant at all in this case." + }, + "2013_30": { + "expert_1": "The appellant A2 Azeez along with two others i.e. A1 Khalid and A3 Babu was tried by the Judicial Magistrate First Class I Aluva for offences punishable under Sections 457 and 380 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code for short the IPC . By order dated 15 12 2000 learned Magistrate convicted the appellant under Section 457 of the IPC and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year. The appellant was further convicted for offence under Section 380 of the IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years. The substantive sentences were ordered to run concurrently. A1 Khalid and A3 Babu were acquitted.\nA1 Khalid and A3 Babu were acquitted.\nThe appellant challenged the said order before the Additional Sessions Judge Ernakulam. Learned Sessions Judge by his order dated 28 11 2002 confirmed the conviction and sentence and dismissed the appeal. Being aggrieved by the said conviction and sentence the appellant filed a criminal revision petition in the Kerala High Court. By the impugned judgment the High Court dismissed the revision petition. Hence this appeal by special leave is filed against the said judgment.\nEvidence of PWs 1 and 2 raise several question marks. If gold chain worn by PW2 was removed by the accused at night it is unbelievable that she would not realize it in the morning. Even PW1 the mother did not realize that the chain worn by PW2 was not around her neck. Assuming this to be true PWs 1 and 2 would at least realize the loss on the next day or a day thereafter. They did not realize that the chain was stolen till 28 11 1995 when the police came to their house with the accused and showed them the chain.\nThe sequence of events is not convincing and does not stand to reason.\nThe appellant is stated to have pointed out to PW8 as the man to whom he had sold the chain. However PW8 has not supported the prosecution case.\nThe courts below have while convicting the appellant placed reliance on the evidence of PW7 the Circle Inspector and PW3 the Head Constable who sought to corroborate the version of PW7 regarding recovery of chain at the instance of the appellant from the shop of PW8. We find it difficult to do so.\nThis view is affirmed by the Sessions Court and the High Court.\n We find it difficult to uphold the above view so far as it relates to the appellant.\nThe incident in our view is not unfolded truthfully. A1 and A3 have been rightly acquitted because nothing links them to the offence. But similar is the case with the appellant.", + "expert_2": "the appellant along with A1 Khalid and A3 Babu with an intention of committing theft entered the house of PW1 Radha at Karumalloor Village on 12 11 1995 at 4.00 a.m through the door which was kept open. They entered the bedroom where PW2 Renuka Devi was sleeping and committed theft of a gold chain weighing 14 grams worth Rs7 500 which PW2 was wearing while she was sleeping. A1 and A3 assisted the appellant in committing the offence. They gave the gold chain to the appellant for selling. The appellant sold the gold chain and the accused divided the sale proceeds and thereby committed the offence.\nThe gold chain was stolen but no complaint was lodged at the police station because PW2 did not realize that her gold chain was stolen. It is only on 28 11 1995 when the police came to their house along with the accused and the gold chain was shown to her that she realized that the gold chain was stolen. She identified the gold chain MO1.\nThe Trial Court however observed that from the evidence of PWs 1 and 2 it is seen that theft had taken in the room in which PW2 was sleeping the thief entered the house and committed theft of gold chain which PW2 was wearing and therefore this act will be covered by Section 451 of the IPC i.e. house trespass in order to commit offence punishable with imprisonment. The Trial Court further held that since the recovery of gold chain was effected on the basis of statement given by the appellant the only inference that can be drawn is that he committed the theft of gold chain and therefore the case is covered by Section 380 of the IPC i.e theft in a dwelling house", + "expert_3": "appellant A2 Azeez along with two others i.e. A1 Khalid and A3 Babu was tried by the Judicial Magistrate First Class I Aluva for offences punishable under Sections 457 and 380 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code for short the IPC . By order dated 15 12 2000 learned Magistrate convicted the appellant under Section 457 of the IPC and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year. The appellant was further convicted for offence under Section 380 of the IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years.\nA1 Khalid and A3 Babu were acquitted\nappellant challenged the said order before the Additional Sessions Judge Ernakulam. Learned Sessions Judge by his order dated 28 11 2002 confirmed the conviction and sentence and dismissed the appeal. Being aggrieved by the said conviction and sentence the appellant filed a criminal revision petition in the Kerala High Court\nBy the impugned judgment the High Court dismissed the revision petition. Hence this appeal by special leave is filed against the said judgment.\nAccording to the prosecution the appellant along with A1 Khalid and A3 Babu with an intention of committing theft entered the house of PW1 Radha at Karumalloor Village on 12 11 1995 at 4.00 a.m through the door which was kept open\nThey entered the bedroom where PW2 Renuka Devi was sleeping and committed theft of a gold chain weighing 14 grams worth Rs7 500 which PW2 was wearing while she was sleeping. A1 and A3 assisted the appellant in committing the offence\nThey gave the gold chain to the appellant for selling\nThe appellant sold the gold chain and the accused divided the sale proceeds and thereby committed the offence.\nCircle Inspector stated that he arrested the accused on 28 11 1995 at 1 a.m near the parking area Municipal Buildings Aluva while they were moving in suspicious circumstances. On questioning them it was revealed that they had committed the offence involved in this case hence they proceeded to the house of PW1 at Aduvathuruthu and recorded her F.I.R Ext.P1\nPW1 in her evidence stated that her daughter PW2 was sleeping in her room on the night of 12 11 1995. PW2 was wearing Thara fashion gold chain. The gold chain was stolen but no complaint was lodged at the police station because PW2 did not realize that her gold chain was stolen.\nIt is only on 28 11 1995 when the police came to their house along with the accused and the gold chain was shown to her that she realized that the gold chain was stolen. She identified the gold chain MO1. FIR Ext.P1 was then lodged. PW2 the daughter stated that on 12 11 1995 at about 11 p.m. she went to sleep. On the next day morning the gold chain was not seen.\nOn 28 11 1995 when the police came to her house with the accused and showed her the chain she realized that her chain was stolen. She identified the chain.\nAccording to the prosecution the appellant made a discovery statement to PW7 the Circle Inspector and pursuant to that statement PW7 went to the shop of PW8 Pradeep along with the appellant. The appellant is stated to have pointed out to PW8 as the man to whom he had sold the chain\nAfter observing that there is nothing in the evidence of PWs 1 to 8 to connect A1 and A3 with the crime the Trial Court acquitted them of all the offences. This view is affirmed by the Sessions Court and the High Court.\nA1 and A3 have been rightly acquitted because nothing links them to the offence\nThe Trial Court has stated that since chain was recovered at the instance of the appellant the only inference which can be drawn is that he committed the theft.", + "expert_4": "learned Magistrate convicted the appellant under Section 457 of the IPC and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year. The appellant was further convicted for offence under Section 380 of the IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years.\nA1 Khalid and A3 Babu were acquitted.\nLearned Sessions Judge by his order dated 28 11 2002 confirmed the conviction and sentence and dismissed the appeal.\nBy the impugned judgment the High Court dismissed the revision petition.\nHence this appeal by special leave is filed against the said judgment.\nAccording to the prosecution the appellant along with A1 Khalid and A3 Babu with an intention of committing theft entered the house of PW1 Radha at Karumalloor Village on 12 11 1995 at 4.00 a.m through the door which was kept open.\nThey entered the bedroom where PW2 Renuka Devi was sleeping and committed theft of a gold chain weighing 14 grams worth Rs7 500 which PW2 was wearing while she was sleeping.\nA1 and A3 assisted the appellant in committing the offence.\nThey gave the gold chain to the appellant for selling.\nThe appellant sold the gold chain and the accused divided the sale proceeds and thereby committed the offence.\nThis case presents rather unusual facts.\nPW7 the Circle Inspector stated that he arrested the accused on 28 11 1995 at 1 a.m near the parking area Municipal Buildings Aluva while they were moving in suspicious circumstances.\nOn questioning them it was revealed that they had committed the offence involved in this case hence they proceeded to the house of PW1 at Aduvathuruthu and recorded her F.I.R Ext.P1 .\nPW1 in her evidence stated that her daughter PW2 was sleeping in her room on the night of 12 11 1995.\nPW2 was wearing Thara fashion gold chain.\nThe gold chain was stolen but no complaint was lodged at the police station because PW2 did not realize that her gold chain was stolen.\nIt is only on 28 11 1995 when the police came to their house along with the accused and the gold chain was shown to her that she realized that the gold chain was stolen.\nShe identified the gold chain MO1.\nFIR Ext.P1 was then lodged.\nPW2 the daughter stated that on 12 11 1995 at about 11 p.m. she went to sleep.\nOn the next day morning the gold chain was not seen.\nOn 28 11 1995 when the police came to her house with the accused and showed her the chain she realized that her chain was stolen.\nShe identified the chain.\nEvidence of PWs 1 and 2 raise several question marks.\nIf gold chain worn by PW2 was removed by the accused at night it is unbelievable that she would not realize it in the morning.\nEven PW1 the mother did not realize that the chain worn by PW2 was not around her neck.\nThey did not realize that the chain was stolen till 28 11 1995 when the police came to their house with the accused and showed them the chain.\nIt is on 28 11 1995 that PW1 lodged her complaint.\nThus the complaint came to be lodged about sixteen days after the incident that too after the police came to PW1s house with the chain.\nThe sequence of events is not convincing and does not stand to reason.\nAccording to the prosecution the appellant made a discovery statement to PW7 the Circle Inspector and pursuant to that statement PW7 went to the shop of PW8 Pradeep along with the appellant.\nThe appellant is stated to have pointed out to PW8 as the man to whom he had sold the chain.\nHowever PW8 has not supported the prosecution case.\nThe courts below have while convicting the appellant placed reliance on the evidence of PW7 the Circle Inspector and PW3 the Head Constable who sought to corroborate the version of PW7 regarding recovery of chain at the instance of the appellant from the shop of PW8.\nWe find it difficult to do so.\nTrial Court has observed that offence under Section 457 of the IPC is not made out because according to PW1 the thieves entered the door which was kept open.\nThe Trial Court therefore acquitted the appellant of the offence punishable under Section 457 of the IPC.\nThe Trial Court also acquitted A1 and A3 of the offence punishable under Section 457 read with Section 34 of the IPC.\nThe Trial Court however observed that from the evidence of PWs 1 and 2 it is seen that theft had taken in the room in which PW2 was sleeping the thief entered the house and committed theft of gold chain which PW2 was wearing and therefore this act will be covered by Section 451 of the IPC i.e. house trespass in order to commit offence punishable with imprisonment.\nThe Trial Court further held that since the recovery of gold chain was effected on the basis of statement given by the appellant the only inference that can be drawn is that he committed the theft of gold chain and therefore the case is covered by Section 380 of the IPC i.e theft in a dwelling house.\nAfter observing that there is nothing in the evidence of PWs 1 to 8 to connect A1 and A3 with the crime the Trial Court acquitted them of all the offences.\nThis view is affirmed by the Sessions Court and the High Court.\nAs we have already noted that FIR was registered after about sixteen days from the date of alleged theft.\nPWs 1 and 2 did not even realize that the chain was stolen.\nIt is only when the accused were brought to their house after about sixteen days that they realized that the chain was stolen and FIR was lodged.\nThe chain in question was being worn by PW2.\nIt is stated to have been stolen while she was sleeping.\nIt is inconceivable that she would not realize that she had lost her chain. The incident in our view is not unfolded truthfully.\nA1 and A3 have been rightly acquitted because nothing links them to the offence.\nBut similar is the case with the appellant.\nThe Trial Court has stated that since chain was recovered at the instance of the appellant the only inference which can be drawn is that he committed the theft. Drawing such inference in the facts of this case would be totally unjust.", + "expert_5": "entered the house of PW1 Radha at Karumalloor Village on 12 11 1995 at 4.00 a.m through the door which was kept open.\n12 11 1995\nThis case presents rather unusual facts.\n28 11 1995\nShe identified the gold chain MO1.\nOn 28 11 1995 when the police came to her house with the accused and showed her the chain she realized that her chain was stolen. She identified the chain.\nThe appellant is stated to have pointed out to PW8 as the man to whom he had sold the chain. However PW8 has not supported the prosecution case.\nAfter observing that there is nothing in the evidence of PWs 1 to 8 to connect A1 and A3 with the crime the Trial Court acquitted them of all the offences.\nThe chain in question was being worn by PW2. It is stated to have been stolen while she was sleeping. It is inconceivable that she would not realize that she had lost her chain.\nA1 and A3 have been rightly acquitted because nothing links them to the offence.\nThe Trial Court has stated that since chain was recovered at the instance of the appellant the only inference which can be drawn is that he committed the theft. Drawing such inference in the facts of this case would be totally unjust." + }, + "2013_35": { + "expert_1": "The High Court while affirming the judgment of the Trial Court in Sessions Case No 49 99 dated 15.03.2000 has convicted Shri Ram A 1 under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code the IPC for short and reversed the judgment of the Trial Court and acquitted Shobha Ram A 2.\nThe High Court has confirmed the conviction and sentence of A 1 passed by the Trial Court. However the High Court has acquitted A 2 only on the ground that A 2 had not actively participated in the commission of the offence and therefore the Trial Court was not justified in convicting A 2 for an offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC.\n It is the correctness or otherwise of the judgment and order passed by the High Court which is called in question by the appellants in this appeal.\nThe nuances of Section 34 of the IPC has been explained by this Court in several decisions but we will only refer to the decision in the case of Nadodi Jayaraman and others vs. State of Tamil Nadu 1992 3 SCC 161 and Saravanan and Another vs. State of Pondicherry 2004 13 SCC 238 . In the case of Nadodi Jayaraman and others Supra the Court has observed 9. Section 34 of IPC enacts that when a criminal act is done by several persons in furtherance of the common intention of all each of such persons is liable for that act in the same manner as if it were done by him alone. The section thus lays down a principle of joint liability in the doing of a criminal act. The essence of that liability is found in the existence of common intention animating the accused leading to the doing of a criminal act in furtherance of such intention. The section is intended to meet a case in which it is difficult to distinguish between the act of individual members of a party and to prove exactly what part was played by each of them. It therefore enacts that once it is found that a criminal act has been committed by several persons in furtherance of the common intention of all each of such persons is liable for the criminal act as if it were done by him alone. It is thus an exception to the general rule of criminal jurisprudence that it is the primary responsibility of the person who actually commits a crime and only that person can be held guilty and punished in accordance with law for his individual act. 15. It is thus clear that the criminal act referred to in Section 34 IPC is the result of the concerted action of more than one person if the said result was reached in furtherance of the common intention and each person must be held liable for the ultimate result as if he had done it himself.\nA perusal of Section 34 of the IPC would clearly indicate that there must be two ingredients for convicting a person with the aid of Section 34 of the IPC. Firstly there must be a common intention and secondly there must be participation by the accused persons in furtherance of the common intention. If the common intention is proved it may not be necessary that the acts of the several persons charged with commission of an offence jointly must be the same or identically similar. The acts may be different in character but must be arising out of the same common intention in order to attract the provision. The said principle is reiterated in a three judge bench decision in Suresh Anr vs. State of U.P 2001 3 SCC 673 and Ramaswami Ayyangar and others vs. State of Tamil Nadu 1976 3 SCC 779 wherein the court has stated that the acts committed by different confederates in the criminal action may be different but all must in one way or the other participate and engage in the criminal enterprise for instance one may only stand guard to prevent any person coming to the relief of the victim or to otherwise facilitate the commission of crime. Such a person also commits an act as much as his co participants actually committing the planned crime. In the case of an offence involving physical violence the person who instigates or aids the commission of the crime must be physically present and such presence of those who in one way or the other facilitate the execution of the common design is itself tantamount to actual participation in the criminal act \n Insofar as common intention is concerned it is a state of mind of an accused which can be inferred objectively from his conduct displayed in the course of commission of crime and also from prior and subsequent attendant circumstances.\nAs observed in Hari Ram vs.State of U.P 2004 8 SCC 146 the existence of direct proof of common intention is seldom available and therefore such intention can only be inferred from the circumstances appearing from the proved facts of the case and the proved circumstances. Therefore in order to bring home the charge of common intention the prosecution has to establish by evidence whether direct or circumstantial that there was plan or meeting of mind of all the accused persons to commit the offence before a person can be vicariously convicted for the act of the other.", + "expert_2": "the High Court has acquitted A 2 only on the ground that A 2 had not actively participated in the commission of the offence and therefore the Trial Court was not justified in convicting A 2 for an offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC.\nSection 34 of IPC enacts that when a criminal act is done by several persons in furtherance of the common intention of all each of such persons is liable for that act in the same manner as if it were done by him alone.\nThe essence of that liability is found in the existence of common intention animating the accused leading to the doing of a criminal act in furtherance of such intention.\nA perusal of Section 34 of the IPC would clearly indicate that there must be two ingredients for convicting a person with the aid of Section 34 of the IPC. Firstly there must be a common intention and secondly there must be participation by the accused persons in furtherance of the common intention.\nRamaswami Ayyangar and others vs. State of Tamil Nadu 1976 3 SCC 779 wherein the court has stated that the acts committed by different confederates in the criminal action may be different but all must in one way or the other participate and engage in the criminal enterprise for instance one may only stand guard to prevent any person coming to the relief of the victim or to otherwise facilitate the commission of crime.\nIn the case of an offence involving physical violence the person who instigates or aids the commission of the crime must be physically present and such presence of those who in one way or the other facilitate the execution of the common design is itself tantamount to actual participation in the criminal act", + "expert_3": "These appeals are directed against the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench Jaipur in Criminal Appeal No 130 of 2000 dated 03.06.2005. The High Court while affirming the judgment of the Trial Court in Sessions Case No 49 99 dated 15.03.2000 has convicted Shri Ram A 1 under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code the IPC for short and reversed the judgment of the Trial Court and acquitted Shobha Ram A 2.\nIt is the acquittal of A 2 which is called in question by the appellant State of Rajasthan in Criminal Appeal No 592 of 2008.\n Criminal Appeal No 593 of 2008 is preferred by Shri Ram A 1 being aggrieved by the order of conviction and sentence passed by the Trial Court and confirmed by the High Court\nThe incident occurred on 16.02.1999 at about 5.30 p.m.\nPW 1 Mohanlal who is the brother of the deceased Trilokchand had lodged the FIR before S.H.O Police Station Chechat regarding the alleged assault on the deceased by the accused persons. On the fateful day the appellants on account of their past enmity over the well located in their lands formed common intention to cause death of Trilokchand since deceased and in furtherance of their common intention they caused injuries to the deceased with stones resulting in his death\nThe accused persons denied the charge and pleaded false implication and therefore the Trial had commenced against both the accused A 1 and A 2.\n During the Trial the prosecution in order to prove the guilt of the accused persons had examined several witnesses including PW 1 and PW 2 Smt\nManoharbai wife of the deceased PW 3 Bhawanishankar PW 4 Kalulal PW 6 Basantilal and other witnesses\nProsecution had projected PW 2 and PW 6 as eye witnesses to the incident.\n The Trial Court after appreciating the evidence of the eye witnesses and others has come to the conclusion that the testimony of PW 2 does not corroborate with the FIR and other material available on record and therefore it could be safely concluded that PW 2 had not seen the occurrence of actual incident and therefore the evidence at the most can only be an hearsay evidence\nHowever the Trial Court has believed the evidence of PW 6 who in his evidence has categorically stated that A 1 was assaulting the deceased with the stones and A 2 was sitting on the chest of the deceased\nThe Trial Court placing reliance on the evidence of PW 6 has convicted and sentenced the accused persons\nAggrieved by the order of conviction and sentence passed by the Trial Court the accused persons had filed appeals before the High Court. The High Court has confirmed the conviction and sentence of A 1 passed by the Trial Court.\nthe High Court has acquitted A 2 only on the ground that A 2 had not actively participated in the commission of the offence and therefore the Trial Court was not justified in convicting A 2 for an offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC.\nThe essence of that liability is found in the existence of common intention animating the accused leading to the doing of a criminal act in furtherance of such intention. The section is intended to meet a case in which it is difficult to distinguish between the act of individual members of a party and to prove exactly what part was played by each of them. It therefore enacts that once it is found that a criminal act has been committed by several persons in furtherance of the common intention of all each of such persons is liable for the criminal act as if it were done by him alone. It is thus an exception to the general rule of criminal jurisprudence that it is the primary responsibility of the person who actually commits a crime and only that person can be held guilty and punished in accordance with law for his individual act\nThe said principle is reiterated in a three judge bench decision in Suresh Anr vs\nState of U.P 2001 3 SCC 673 and Ramaswami Ayyangar and others vs. State of Tamil Nadu 1976 3 SCC 779 wherein the court has stated that the acts committed by different confederates in the criminal action may be different but all must in one way or the other participate and engage in the criminal enterprise for instance one may only stand guard to prevent any person coming to the relief of the victim or to otherwise facilitate the commission of crime.\nSuch a person also commits an act as much as his co participants actually committing the planned crime.\nAs observed in Hari Ram vs.State of U.P 2004 8 SCC 146 the existence of direct proof of common intention is seldom available and therefore such intention can only be inferred from the circumstances appearing from the proved facts of the case and the proved circumstances\nTherefore in order to bring home the charge of common intention the prosecution has to establish by evidence whether direct or circumstantial that there was plan or meeting of mind of all the accused persons to commit the offence before a person can be vicariously convicted for the act of the other", + "expert_4": "The incident occurred on 16.02.1999 at about 5.30 p.m.\nPW 1 Mohanlal who is the brother of the deceased Trilokchand had lodged the FIR before S.H.O Police Station Chechat regarding the alleged assault on the deceased by the accused persons.\nOn the fateful day the appellants on account of their past enmity over the well located in their lands formed common intention to cause death of Trilokchand since deceased and in furtherance of their common intention they caused injuries to the deceased with stones resulting in his death.\nThe FIR was registered and after the completion of the investigation the investigating agency had filed a charge sheet against A 1 and A 2 under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC.\nThe accused persons denied the charge and pleaded false implication and therefore the Trial had commenced against both the accused A 1 and A 2.\nDuring the Trial the prosecution in order to prove the guilt of the accused persons had examined several witnesses including PW 1 and PW 2 Smt.\nProsecution had projected PW 2 and PW 6 as eye witnesses to the incident.\nThe Trial Court after appreciating the evidence of the eye witnesses and others has come to the conclusion that the testimony of PW 2 does not corroborate with the FIR and other material available on record and therefore it could be safely concluded that PW 2 had not seen the occurrence of actual incident and therefore the evidence at the most can only be an hearsay evidence.\nHowever the Trial Court has believed the evidence of PW 6 who in his evidence has categorically stated that A 1 was assaulting the deceased with the stones and A 2 was sitting on the chest of the deceased.\nThe Trial Court placing reliance on the evidence of PW 6 has convicted and sentenced the accused persons under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs1000 each and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for a further period of six months.\nAggrieved by the order of conviction and sentence passed by the Trial Court the accused persons had filed appeals before the High Court.\nThe High Court has confirmed the conviction and sentence of A 1 passed by the Trial Court.\nHowever the High Court has acquitted A 2 only on the ground that A 2 had not actively participated in the commission of the offence and therefore the Trial Court was not justified in convicting A 2 for an offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC.\nThe Trial Court and the High Court has convicted A 1 based on the evidence of the sole eye witness namely PW 6.\nIn his evidence PW 6 has stated A 2 was acting in concert with A 1 in causing the murder of the deceased wherein A 1 was assaulting the deceased with stones and A 2 had facilitated the execution of the common design by sitting on the chest of the deceased.\nDespite cross examination at length PW 6 has maintained his version thereby not leaving any scope for the defense to elicit anything against the prosecution witness\nTherefore in our opinion the evidence of the said witness is of sterling quality and therefore reliable and trustworthy leaving us with no other alternative but to accept his evidence.\nTherefore we decline to interfere with the finding and conclusion reached by the Trial Court insofar as convicting A 1 is concerned.\nThe High Court has acquitted A 2 only on the ground that merely sitting on the chest of the deceased rules out the possibility of active participation by A 2 in the commission of offence and therefore has acquitted him from the charges under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC.\nThe nuances of Section 34 of the IPC has been explained by this Court in several decisions\nIn the case of Nadodi Jayaraman and others Supra the Court has observed 9. Section 34 of IPC enacts that when a criminal act is done by several persons in furtherance of the common intention of all each of such persons is liable for that act in the same manner as if it were done by him alone.\nThe section thus lays down a principle of joint liability in the doing of a criminal act.\nThe essence of that liability is found in the existence of common intention animating the accused leading to the doing of a criminal act in furtherance of such intention.\nThe section is intended to meet a case in which it is difficult to distinguish between the act of individual members of a party and to prove exactly what part was played by each of them.\nIt therefore enacts that once it is found that a criminal act has been committed by several persons in furtherance of the common intention of all each of such persons is liable for the criminal act as if it were done by him alone.\nIt is thus an exception to the general rule of criminal jurisprudence that it is the primary responsibility of the person who actually commits a crime and only that person can be held guilty and punished in accordance with law for his individual act.\nIt is thus clear that the criminal act referred to in Section 34 IPC is the result of the concerted action of more than one person if the said result was reached in furtherance of the common intention and each person must be held liable for the ultimate result as if he had done it himself.\nperusal of Section 34 of the IPC would clearly indicate that there must be two ingredients for convicting a person with the aid of Section 34 of the IPC.\nFirstly there must be a common intention and secondly there must be participation by the accused persons in furtherance of the common intention.\nIf the common intention is proved it may not be necessary that the acts of the several persons charged with commission of an offence jointly must be the same or identically similar.\nThe acts may be different in character but must be arising out of the same common intention in order to attract the provision.\nThe said principle is reiterated in a three judge bench decision in Suresh Anr vs. State of U.P 2001 3 SCC 673 and Ramaswami Ayyangar and others vs. State of Tamil Nadu 1976 3 SCC 779 wherein the court has stated that the acts committed by different confederates in the criminal action may be different but all must in one way or the other participate and engage in the criminal enterprise for instance one may only stand guard to prevent any person coming to the relief of the victim or to otherwise facilitate the commission of crime.\nSuch a person also commits an act as much as his co participants actually committing the planned crime.\nIn the case of an offence involving physical violence the person who instigates or aids the commission of the crime must be physically present and such presence of those who in one way or the other facilitate the execution of the common design is itself tantamount to actual participation in the criminal act \n Insofar as common intention is concerned it is a state of mind of an accused which can be inferred objectively from his conduct displayed in the course of commission of crime and also from prior and subsequent attendant circumstances.\nAs observed in Hari Ram vs.State of U.P 2004 8 SCC 146 the existence of direct proof of common intention is seldom available and therefore such intention can only be inferred from the circumstances appearing from the proved facts of the case and the proved circumstances.\nTherefore in order to bring home the charge of common intention the prosecution has to establish by evidence whether direct or circumstantial that there was plan or meeting of mind of all the accused persons to commit the offence before a person can be vicariously convicted for the act of the other.\nIt has come in the evidence of PW 6 that A 1 was assaulting the deceased with stones and A 2 was sitting on the chest of the deceased.\nThe aforesaid chain of events gives a clear picture of the whole incident that had taken place on that fateful day.\nThe evidence of PW 6 when seen in entirety and in its proper perspective we can conclude that both the accused persons i.e. A 1 and A 2 had a common intention to assault and kill the deceased person with A 2 as a participant in the crime with the intention of lending weight to the commission of an offence pursuant to a pre concerted plan.", + "expert_5": "However the Trial Court has believed the evidence of PW 6 who in his evidence has categorically stated that A 1 was assaulting the deceased with the stones and A 2 was sitting on the chest of the deceased\nIn his evidence PW 6 has stated A 2 was acting in concert with A 1 in causing the murder of the deceased wherein A 1 was assaulting the deceased with stones and A 2 had facilitated the execution of the common design by sitting on the chest of the deceased.\nSection 34 of IPC enacts that when a criminal act is done by several persons in furtherance of the common intention of all each of such persons is liable for that act in the same manner as if it were done by him alone.\nexistence of common intention animating the accused leading to the doing of a criminal act in furtherance of such intention.\nIt therefore enacts that once it is found that a criminal act has been committed by several persons in furtherance of the common intention of all each of such persons is liable for the criminal act as if it were done by him alone.\nIt is thus clear that the criminal act referred to in Section 34 IPC is the result of the concerted action of more than one person if the said result was reached in furtherance of the common intention and each person must be held liable for the ultimate result as if he had done it himself.\nFirstly there must be a common intention and secondly there must be participation by the accused persons in furtherance of the common intention.\nIf the common intention is proved it may not be necessary that the acts of the several persons charged with commission of an offence jointly must be the same or identically similar. The acts may be different in character but must be arising out of the same common intention in order to attract the provision.\nThe said principle is reiterated in a three judge bench decision in Suresh Anr vs. State of U.P 2001 3 SCC 673 and Ramaswami Ayyangar and others vs. State of Tamil Nadu 1976 3 SCC 779\nthe court has stated that the acts committed by different confederates in the criminal action may be different but all must in one way or the other participate and engage in the criminal enterprise for instance one may only stand guard to prevent any person coming to the relief of the victim or to otherwise facilitate the commission of crime.\nIn the case of an offence involving physical violence the person who instigates or aids the commission of the crime must be physically present and such presence of those who in one way or the other facilitate the execution of the common design is itself tantamount to actual participation in the criminal act\nInsofar as common intention is concerned it is a state of mind of an accused which can be inferred objectively from his conduct displayed in the course of commission of crime and also from prior and subsequent attendant circumstances.\nAs observed in Hari Ram vs.State of U.P 2004 8 SCC 146 the existence of direct proof of common intention is seldom available and therefore such intention can only be inferred from the circumstances appearing from the proved facts of the case and the proved circumstances.\nhaving an old enmity with the deceased resulting in a constant skirmish over the well located in their lands.\nOn the said date of incident the animosity culminated to an assault on the deceased by the accused persons when the deceased was nearing his land." + }, + "2013_57": { + "expert_1": "These applications have been preferred under Order XVIII Rule 5 of the Supreme Court Rules 1966 for short the Rules against the order of the Registrar dated 28.8.2012 alleging that the applications under Order XVIII Rule 5 of the Rules lodging the applications for clarification modification of the Judgment dated 11.1.2012 of this Court in Civil Appeal Nos281 282 of 2012 cannot be sustained in law.\nThese applications have been preferred under Order XVIII Rule 5 of the Supreme Court Rules 1966 for short the Rules against the order of the Registrar dated 28.8.2012 alleging that the applications under Order XVIII Rule 5 of the Rules lodging the applications for clarification modification of the Judgment dated 11.1.2012 of this Court in Civil Appeal Nos281 282 of 2012 cannot be sustained in law.\nApplications for clarification modification were filed on 21.2.12 seeking the following reliefs\nApplications were rejected holding those applications filed would amount to seeking review of the Judgment and order passed by this Court on 11.1.2012.\nApplications were therefore rejected placing reliance on the Judgment of this Court in Delhi Administration v. Gurdip Singh Urban and others 2000 7 SCC 296.\nRajeev Dhawan learned senior counsel appearing for the applicants submitted that the respondent State of Madhya Pradesh had suppressed various documents which had substantial bearing on the outcome of the appeals.\nLearned senior counsel submitted that various statements made by the State were couched with malice fraud and material suppression of facts. Consequently it was stated that the Registrar should have entertained the applications for modification clarification and were wrongly lodged.\nWe fully endorse the view expressed by the Registrar that the prayers made in the applications would clearly fall in the realm of an application for review of the Judgment of this Court dated 11.1.2012 on the ground of fraud and material suppression of documents and there is no question of clarification modification of the Judgment of this Court dated 11.1.2012.\n We are of the view that the practice of overcoming the provision for review under Order XL of the Rules by filing an application for re hearing modification clarification has to be deprecated.\nAt the outset we have to refer to the practice of filing review applications in large numbers in undeserving cases without properly examining whether the cases strictly come within the narrow confines of Rule XL of the Supreme Court Rules.\nIn several cases it has become almost everyday experience that review applications are filed mechanically as a matter of routine and the grounds for review are a mere reproduction of the grounds of special leave and there is no indication as to which ground strictly falls within the narrow limits of Rule XL of the Rules. We seriously deprecate this practice.\nHowever with a view to avoid this procedure of no hearing we find that sometimes applications are filed for clarification modification or recall etc not because any such clarification modification is indeed necessary but because the applicant in reality wants a review and also wants a hearing thus avoiding listing of the same in chambers by way of circulation. Such applications if they are in substance review applications deserve to be rejected straight away inasmuch as the attempt is obviously to bypass Order XL Rule 3 relating to circulation of the application in chambers for consideration without oral hearing. By describing an application as one for clarification or modification though it is really one of review a party cannot be permitted to circumvent or bypass the circulation procedure and indirectly obtain a hearing in the open court.\nIn that event the Court could either reject the application straight away with or without costs or permit withdrawal with leave to file a review application to be listed initially in chambers.\nWhat we have said above equally applies to such applications filed after rejection of review applications particularly when a second review is not permissible under the Rules.\nWe are of the view that the ratio laid down in the above mentioned Judgment squarely applies to the facts of this case as well.", + "expert_2": "These applications have been preferred under Order XVIII Rule 5 of the Supreme Court Rules 1966 for short the Rules against the order of the Registrar dated 28.8.2012 alleging that the applications under Order XVIII Rule 5 of the Rules lodging the applications for clarification modification of the Judgment dated 11.1.2012 of this Court in Civil Appeal Nos281 282 of 2012 cannot be sustained in law.\nApplications were rejected holding those applications filed would amount to seeking review of the Judgment and order passed by this Court on 11.1.2012.\nsenior counsel appearing for the applicants submitted that the respondent State of Madhya Pradesh had suppressed various documents which had substantial bearing on the outcome of the appeals.\nit was stated that the Registrar should have entertained the applications for modification clarification and were wrongly lodged.\nWe are of the view that the practice of overcoming the provision for review under Order XL of the Rules by filing an application for re hearing modification clarification has to be deprecated.\nIA Nos4 5 were listed before the Court and a preliminary objection was raised stating that the applications couched as applications for clarification modification or for recall could not be entertained once the review petitions filed by the applicant were dismissed.\nThis procedure is meant to save the time of the Court and to preclude frivolous review petitions being filed and heard in open court. However with a view to avoid this procedure of no hearing we find that sometimes applications are filed for clarification modification or recall etc not because any such clarification modification is indeed necessary but because the applicant in reality wants a review and also wants a hearing thus avoiding listing of the same in chambers by way of circulation.\nWe therefore agree with the learned Solicitor General that the Court should not permit hearing of such an application for clarification modification or recall if the application is in substance one for review.\nWe should not however be understood as saying that in no case an application for clarification modification or recall is maintainable after the first disposal of the matter.\nGenerally an application for correction of a typographical error or omission of a word etc in a Judgment or order would lie but a petition which is intended to review an order or Judgment under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure and in criminal proceedings except on the ground of an error apparent on the face of the record could not be achieved by filing an application for clarification modification recall or rehearing for which a properly constituted review is the remedy.", + "expert_3": "These applications have been preferred under Order XVIII Rule 5 of the Supreme Court Rules 1966 for short the Rules against the order of the Registrar dated 28.8.2012 alleging that the applications under Order XVIII Rule 5 of the Rules lodging the applications for clarification modification of the Judgment dated 11.1.2012 of this Court in Civil Appeal Nos281 282 of 2012 cannot be sustained in law\nApplications for clarification modification were filed on 21.2.12 seeking the following reliefs a Clarify modify the observations contained in paragraphs 21 and 22 of the Judgment dated 11.1.2012 in view of the Notifications being produced by the Applicant herein along with the present application specially Notification dated 20.9.1965 issued by the State Government in exercise of powers under Section 52 of the Madhya Pradesh Town Improvement Trusts Act 1960 b Clarify modify operative directions in the Judgment dated 11.1.2012 by which it has been held that the Gwalior Development Authority did not have authority or power to execute the lease in favour of the applicant herein c Direct the Appellant to produce before this Honble Court the official records in respect of Scheme 2 B framed by the then Gwalior Improvement Trust including the Notifications and orders issued by the State Government in respect thereto photocopies of some of which are being produced along with the present applications and d Pass such other order or orders as may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. Applications were rejected holding those applications filed would amount to seeking review of the Judgment and order passed by this Court on 11.1.2012.\nIt was noticed that on the pretext of application for clarification modification applicant in fact sought nothing but recalling of the Judgment and order dated 11.1.2012 and substitution of the directions contained therein which according to the Registrar would amount to a prayer for reviewing the Judgment. Applications were therefore rejected placing reliance on the Judgment of this Court in Delhi Administration v\nGurdip Singh Urban and others\nlearned senior counsel appearing for the applicants submitted that the respondent State of Madhya Pradesh had suppressed various documents which had substantial bearing on the outcome of the appeals.\nLearned senior counsel submitted that various statements made by the State were couched with malice fraud and material suppression of facts\nRegistrar of this Court earlier in an application for re hearing took the same stand in the year 1981. This Court dismissed a Criminal Appeal No220 of 1974 on 3.4.1981.\nAppellant therein filed an application for re hearing of the appeal on 20.4.1981\nThe counsel was informed by the Registry that since appeal had been disposed of after hearing the counsel for the parties no application for re hearing would lie and if he so advised could file a review petition under the Rules. Consequently the application was not registered.\nThis Court examined the question in detail in Gurdip Singh Uban supra and held as follows 16. At the outset we have to refer to the practice of filing review applications in large numbers in undeserving cases without properly examining whether the cases strictly come within the narrow confines of Rule XL of the Supreme Court Rules. In several cases it has become almost everyday experience that review applications are filed mechanically as a matter of routine and the grounds for review are a mere reproduction of the grounds of special leave and there is no indication as to which ground strictly falls within the narrow limits of Rule XL of the Rules. We seriously deprecate this practice. If parties file review petitions indiscriminately the time of the Court is unnecessarily wasted even it be in chambers where the review petitions are listed.\nGreater care seriousness and restraint is needed in filing review applications\nThis procedure is meant to save the time of the Court and to preclude frivolous review petitions being filed and heard in open court\nWhat cannot be done directly cannot be permitted to be done indirectly", + "expert_4": "Applications for clarification modification were filed on 21.2.12 seeking the following reliefs a Clarify modify the observations contained in paragraphs 21 and 22 of the Judgment dated 11.1.2012 in view of the Notifications being produced by the Applicant herein along with the present application specially Notification dated 20.9.1965 issued by the State Government in exercise of powers under Section 52 of the Madhya Pradesh Town Improvement Trusts Act 1960 b Clarify modify operative directions in the Judgment dated 11.1.2012 by which it has been held that the Gwalior Development Authority did not have authority or power to execute the lease in favour of the applicant herein c Direct the Appellant to produce before this Honble Court the official records in respect of Scheme 2 B framed by the then Gwalior Improvement Trust including the Notifications and orders issued by the State Government in respect thereto photocopies of some of which are being produced along with the present applications and d Pass such other order or orders as may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.\nApplications were rejected holding those applications filed would amount to seeking review of the Judgment and order passed by this Court on 11.1.2012.\nIt was noticed that on the pretext of application for clarification modification applicant in fact sought nothing but recalling of the Judgment and order dated 11.1.2012 and substitution of the directions contained therein which according to the Registrar would amount to a prayer for reviewing the Judgment.\nApplications were therefore rejected placing reliance on the Judgment of this Court in Delhi Administration v. Gurdip Singh Urban and others 2000 7 SCC 296.\nDr. Rajeev Dhawan learned senior counsel appearing for the applicants submitted that the respondent State of Madhya Pradesh had suppressed various documents which had substantial bearing on the outcome of the appeals\nAccording to the learned senior counsel the following are some of the documents which were suppressed from this Court i Gazette Notification dated 27th September 1963 formulating Housing Scheme under Section 46 of the Madhya Pradesh Town Improvement Trust Act 1960 Act of 1960 . ii Gazette Notification dated 4th October 1963 for Housing Schemes iii Details of the Acquisition of land and structure of village Ghospura and Mehra Annexure R 1 3 iv Gazette Notification under Section 52 1 s of the Act of 1960 sanctioning the Scheme\n Learned senior counsel submitted that the only argument urged before the Bench was that since the property in question was Government land which had not been transferred by it to Gwalior Development Authority the authority could not have dealt with such land by executing a lease which had been in favour of the applicants.\nLearned senior counsel submitted that various statements made by the State were couched with malice fraud and material suppression of facts.\nConsequently it was stated that the Registrar should have entertained the applications for modification clarification and were wrongly lodged.\nWe fully endorse the view expressed by the Registrar that the prayers made in the applications would clearly fall in the realm of an application for review of the Judgment of this Court dated 11.1.2012 on the ground of fraud and material suppression of documents and there is no question of clarification modification of the Judgment of this Court dated 11.1.2012.\nWe are of the view that the practice of overcoming the provision for review under Order XL of the Rules by filing an application for re hearing modification clarification has to be deprecated.\nRegistrar of this Court earlier in an application for re hearing took the same stand in the year 1981.\nThis Court dismissed a Criminal Appeal No220 of 1974 on 3.4.1981. Appellant therein filed an application for re hearing of the appeal on 20.4.1981. The counsel was informed by the Registry that since appeal had been disposed of after hearing the counsel for the parties no application for re hearing would lie and if he so advised could file a review petition under the Rules.\nConsequently the application was not registered.\nThe order of the Registrar is reported in Sone Lal and others v. State of Uttar Pradesh 1982 2 SCC 398.\nThe above mentioned order of the Registrar was later endorsed by this Court in Delhi Administration v. Gurdip Singh Uban and others 2000 7 SCC 296.\nIn that case Civil Appeal Nos4656 57 of 1999 were allowed by a two Judge Bench Judgment of this Court reported in Delhi Administration v. Gurdip Singh Uban 1999 7 SCC 44 and the appeals of Delhi Administration and Delhi Development Authority were allowed. The appellant in Civil Appeal No4656 of 1999 was the Delhi Administration while the appellant in CA No4657 of 1999 was Delhi Development Authority.\nAfter the appeals were allowed by this Court on 20.8.1999 Review Petition Nos1402 03 of 1999 were filed in the two appeals by Gurdip Singh Uban and they were dismissed in circulation by a reasoned order on 24.11.1999.\nAnother Review Petition No21 of 2000 filed by another person was not listed on that date. IA No3 of 1999 was later listed along with IA Nos4 5 filed by Gurdip Singh Uban on 23.12.1999. Gurdip Singh Uban it may be noted had filed IA Nos4 5 in spite of dismissal of his review petition on 24.11.1999.\nIA Nos4 5 were listed before the Court and a preliminary objection was raised stating that the applications couched as applications for clarification modification or for recall could not be entertained once the review petitions filed by the applicant were dismissed.\nThis Court examined the question in detail in Gurdip Singh Uban supra and held as follows\nAt the outset we have to refer to the practice of filing review applications in large numbers in undeserving cases without properly examining whether the cases strictly come within the narrow confines of Rule XL of the Supreme Court Rules.\nIn several cases it has become almost everyday experience that review applications are filed mechanically as a matter of routine and the grounds for review are a mere reproduction of the grounds of special leave and there is no indication as to which ground strictly falls within the narrow limits of Rule XL of the Rules.\nWe seriously deprecate this practice.\nIf parties file review petitions indiscriminately the time of the Court is unnecessarily wasted even it be in chambers where the review petitions are listed.\nGreater care seriousness and restraint is needed in filing review applications.\nWe next come to applications described as applications for clarification modification or recall of judgments or orders finally passed.\nWe may point out that under the relevant Rule XL of the Supreme Court Rules 1966 a review application has first to go before the learned Judges in circulation and it will be for the Court to consider whether the application is to be rejected without giving an oral hearing or whether notice is to be issued.\nOrder XL Rule 3 states as follows 3\nUnless otherwise ordered by the Court an application for review shall be disposed of by circulation without any oral arguments but the petitioner may supplement his petition by additional written arguments.\nThe Court may either dismiss the petition or direct notice to the opposite party.... In case notice is issued the review petition will be listed for hearing after notice is served.\nThis procedure is meant to save the time of the Court and to preclude frivolous review petitions being filed and heard in open court.\nHowever with a view to avoid this procedure of no hearing we find that sometimes applications are filed for clarification modification or recall etc not because any such clarification modification is indeed necessary but because the applicant in reality wants a review and also wants a hearing thus avoiding listing of the same in chambers by way of circulation.\nSuch applications if they are in substance review applications deserve to be rejected straight away inasmuch as the attempt is obviously to bypass Order XL Rule 3 relating to circulation of the application in chambers for consideration without oral hearing.\nBy describing an application as one for clarification or modification though it is really one of review a party cannot be permitted to circumvent or bypass the circulation procedure and indirectly obtain a hearing in the open court.\nWhat cannot be done directly cannot be permitted to be done indirectly See in this connection a detailed order of the then Registrar of this Court in Sone Lal v. State of U.P deprecating a similar practice\nWe therefore agree with the learned Solicitor General that the Court should not permit hearing of such an application for clarification modification or recall if the application is in substance one for review.\nIn that event the Court could either reject the application straight away with or without costs or permit withdrawal with leave to file a review application to be listed initially in chambers.\nWhat we have said above equally applies to such applications filed after rejection of review applications particularly when a second review is not permissible under the Rules.\nUnder Order XL Rule 5 a second review is not permitted.\nThe said Rule reads as follows 5.\nWhere an application for review of any judgment and order has been made and disposed of no further application for review shall be entertained in the same matter.\nWe should not however be understood as saying that in no case an application for clarification modification or recall is maintainable after the first disposal of the matter.\nAll that we are saying is that once such an application is listed in Court the Court will examine whether it is in substance in the nature of review and is to be rejected with or without costs or requires to be withdrawn with leave to file a review petition to be listed in chambers by circulation.", + "expert_5": "We are of the view that the practice of overcoming the provision for review under Order XL of the Rules by filing an application for re hearing modification clarification has to be deprecated.\nRegistrar of this Court earlier in an application for re hearing took the same stand in the year 1981.\nThe above mentioned order of the Registrar was later endorsed by this Court in Delhi Administration v. Gurdip Singh Uban and others 2000 7 SCC 296.\nthe practice of filing review applications in large numbers in undeserving cases without properly examining whether the cases strictly come within the narrow confines of Rule XL of the Supreme Court Rules.\nIn several cases it has become almost everyday experience that review applications are filed mechanically as a matter of routine and the grounds for review are a mere reproduction of the grounds of special leave and there is no indication as to which ground strictly falls within the narrow limits of Rule XL of the Rules.\nIf parties file review petitions indiscriminately the time of the Court is unnecessarily wasted even it be in chambers where the review petitions are listed.\nunder the relevant Rule XL of the Supreme Court Rules 1966 a review application has first to go before the learned Judges in circulation and it will be for the Court to consider whether the application is to be rejected without giving an oral hearing or whether notice is to be issued. Order XL Rule 3 states as follows 3. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court an application for review shall be disposed of by circulation without any oral arguments but the petitioner may supplement his petition by additional written arguments. The Court may either dismiss the petition or direct notice to the opposite party.... In case notice is issued the review petition will be listed for hearing after notice is served.\nThis procedure is meant to save the time of the Court and to preclude frivolous review petitions being filed and heard in open court.\nHowever with a view to avoid this procedure of no hearing we find that sometimes applications are filed for clarification modification or recall etc not because any such clarification modification is indeed necessary but because the applicant in reality wants a review and also wants a hearing thus avoiding listing of the same in chambers by way of circulation.\nSuch applications if they are in substance review applications deserve to be rejected straight away inasmuch as the attempt is obviously to bypass Order XL Rule 3 relating to circulation of the application in chambers for consideration without oral hearing.\nWhat we have said above equally applies to such applications filed after rejection of review applications particularly when a second review is not permissible under the Rules.\nWe are of the view that the ratio laid down in the above mentioned Judgment squarely applies to the facts of this case as well." + }, + "2013_95": { + "expert_1": "This appeal is directed against judgment dated 3.2.2010 of the Division Bench of the Madras High Court whereby the writ appeal filed by the appellant was dismissed and the order passed by the learned Single Judge negating his challenge to the order of punishment was upheld.\nKindly refer to the report of the enquiry officer which appears to have been made out entirely relying upon the report Dated 22nd February 1990 of the Chief Invigilator miserably superseding the factual evidences deposed by me at the oral enquiry. While the Chief Invigilator was apparently not at all interrogated in regard to the correctness of his statement the credibility of his report is doubtful. As such the report of the Enquiry officer which is entirely based upon it is seemingly questionable and appears arbitrary too.\nIn response to the appellants request the Commission made available the statement of the Chief Invigilator recorded by the Controller of Examination. After receiving the same the appellant submitted application dated 18.4.1991 to the Deputy Secretary Administration for grant of permission to cross examine the Chief Invigilator the officer of the Commission in whose presence request is sought to have been made to the Chief Invigilator not to report the matter to the Commission and the person who appointed him along with others as Invigilators.\nHe also submitted representation dated 20.5.1991 to the Chairman of the Commission and sought his intervention for ensuring compliance of the rules of natural justice. However without waiting for the decision of his representations the Secretary of the Commission passed order dated 10.10.1991 and imposed punishment of removal from service.\n The departmental appeal filed by the appellant was dismissed by the Chairman of the Commission vide order dated 14.8.1992. He reiterated the findings recorded by the Enquiry Officer and the Secretary that the appellant had unauthorisedly done the work of Invigilator and prevented the Chief Invigilator from reporting the matter to the Commission.\n The appellant challenged the order of punishment and the appellate order in Writ Petition No19251 1992 but could not convince the learned Single Judge to quash orders dated 10.10.1991 and 14.8.1992.\nThe writ appeal filed by him was dismissed by the Division Bench of the High Court which expressed concurrence with the learned Single Judge that the enquiry was held against the appellant in consonance with the rules of natural justice and the findings recorded by the Enquiry Officer were based on proper analysis of the records produced during the enquiry.\nThe Courts are primarily concerned with the question whether the enquiry has been held by the competent authority in accordance with the prescribed procedure and whether the rules of natural justice have been followed. The Court can also consider whether there was some tangible evidence for proving the charge against the delinquent and such evidence reasonably supports the conclusions recorded by the competent authority. If the Court comes to the conclusion that the enquiry was held in consonance with the prescribed procedure and the rules of natural justice and the conclusion recorded by the disciplinary authority is supported by some tangible evidence then there is no scope for interference with the discretion exercised by the disciplinary authority to impose the particular punishment except when the same is found to be wholly disproportionate to the misconduct found proved or shocks the conscience of the Court.\nAn analysis of the above reproduced rule makes it clear that holding of an oral enquiry is sine qua non for recording a finding by the enquiring authority and the report of enquiry must contain sufficient record of evidence and statement of the findings together with grounds thereof.\nThe main allegations leveled against the appellant were that he had unauthorisedly worked as Invigilator and prevented the Chief Invigilator Syed Abdul Kareem from sending report about the incident involving mixing of the question papers of two sessions. On behalf of the Commission oral evidence is said to have been adduced to substantiate the allegations leveled against the appellant but neither the report of the Enquiry Officer nor the orders passed by the Secretary and the Chairman of the Commission make a mention of that evidence. As a matter of fact neither of them relied upon the same for recording a finding of guilty against the appellant.\nRather the Enquiry Officer and the two authorities relied upon the portions of the statement made by the Chief Invigilator before the Controller of Examinations and the Inspector completely ignoring that it was he who had asked for substitute Invigilators because those already nominated had conveyed their unwillingness to work and that in the statements made before the Controller of Examinations and the Inspector Crime Investigation Department the Chief Invigilator categorically stated that the appellant had produced the order by which he had been nominated to work as Invigilator and he had no role in bringing the question papers from the office of the Commission or distribution thereof.\n Unfortunately the learned Single Judge and the Division Bench of the High Court failed to take cognizance of the admission made by the Chief Invigilator that on a request made by him five substitute Invigilators including R.Mahalingam had been appointed by P Section of the Commission and he had produced the order of his appointment and that the question papers etc had been brought by him i.e the Chief Invigilator from the office of the Commission and opened seals in the presence of two other invigilators .\nBefore the Enquiry Officer no evidence was produced by the Commission to prove that the appellant had the custody of the question papers. Rather the statements made by the Chief Invigilator before the Inspector Crime Investigation Department and the Controller of Examinations clearly show that he had collected the question papers from the office of the Commission that the seals were opened at the examination center in the presence of two persons and the appellant had not played any role in the exercise.", + "expert_2": "During the month of February 1990 an order from the office of TNPSC came to me on 14.2.90 to conduct the TNPSC Examination for Assistant Medical Officer post on 17.2.90 full day and 18.2.90 half day fore noon only .\nHe told me that this order is passed by District Collector Chennai as such it is not possible for us to do anything and asked me to get the amount by sending a man with me. I got the cheque and came to him and asked a list of persons who are going to assist me. At this time TNPSC gave 19 persons to assist me. But certain persons informed me over phone at G.H that it is not possible for them to assist me. Again I went to the TNPSC Office on 16.2.90 and informed the position to the concerned Superintendent at about 2 noon. He told me that they had posted 5 persons to assist me from their section.\nThen I have decided to inform it to TNPSC office and it was written by Mahalingam as per my dictation. Mahalingam told me that if the said letter is sent the staff of TNPSC office will get some trouble that the name of Controller will be spoiled that the said Controller belongs to his community and that he is going to get the post of District Collector shortly. Hence I have not informed it to TNPSC over phone.\nIn his reply the appellant pointed out that his name did not figure in the first information report got registered with the police and the remand report and that the real culprits had already been apprehended. The appellant also claimed that he was not connected with the leakage of question papers.\nI have nothing to say about the charge No3 since the office in its Memorandum dated 11.10.90 has stated to the effect that enquiry by the Police in connection with the leakage of question papers Assistant Surgeon recruitment is going on separately whereas departmental action has been taken against him mainly for his having unauthorisedly acted as Invigilator while he was on leave.\nFor the third charge i.e resultant leakage of question paper was referred to police for investigation. Moreover the third charge has not been pressed in the office Memorandum dated 11.10.90.\nA notice of the proposed enquiry was given only a day in advance. Ample opportunity was not given.\nThe scope of judicial review in matters involving challenge to the disciplinary action taken by the employer is very limited. The Courts are primarily concerned with the question whether the enquiry has been held by the competent authority in accordance with the prescribed procedure and whether the rules of natural justice have been followed.\nIf the Court comes to the conclusion that the enquiry was held in consonance with the prescribed procedure and the rules of natural justice and the conclusion recorded by the disciplinary authority is supported by some tangible evidence then there is no scope for interference with the discretion exercised by the disciplinary authority to impose the particular punishment except when the same is found to be wholly disproportionate to the misconduct found proved or shocks the conscience of the Court.\nHe shall be required within a reasonable time to put in a written statement of his defence and to state whether he desires an oral inquiry or to be heard in person or both. An oral inquiry shall be held if such an inquiry is desired by the person charged or is directed by the authority concerned. Even if a person charged has waived an oral inquiry such inquiry shall be held by the authority concerned in respect of charges which are not admitted by the person charged and which can be proved only through the evidence of witnesses", + "expert_3": "In February 1990 the appellant was sanctioned unearned leave from 12.2.1990 to 25.2.1990 for private work. During that period P Section of the Commission is said to have directed him to work as Invigilator at Bharathiyar Women Arts College Chennai which was one of the centers for the written examination on 17.2.1990 and 18.2.1990 held for recruitment of Assistant Surgeons.\nIn the examination held on 17.2.1990 six candidates sitting in Hall No76 were given the question papers of the afternoon examination in the morning examination.\nThe Commission took serious view of the matter and got registered a First Information Report.\nBut in one of the Halls i.e Hall No 76 where 41 candidates were allotted it was found that after noon question papers were mingled. On hearing the fact I immediately received back 6 question papers from 6 candidates and issued them other question papers intended for fore noon session.\nWhen I wanted to inform the facts to the TNPSC office immediately the invigilator Thiru Mahalingam Assistant TNPSC office who was assisting me requested me not to inform since the papers were immediately received back from the candidates. Further he said that the staff attached to TNPSC office who were responsible for this mingling the question papers would be punished and the name of the TNPSC will be spoiled\nSince he is a serviced employee of the TNPSC I had to take his advice considering that he is pleading knowing all pros and cons\nThiru Gurumoorthy a Member of TNPSC visited the examination centre and met me and enquired about the conduct of the examination. Though I was prepared to inform the Member about the receipt of Mingling of question papers again Mr.\nMahalingam stopped me and requested not to tell.\nAgain I did not inform him the fact of the mingle of the question papers in the morning session at the insistence of the same person Mr. Mahalingm\nThough I should have informed the fact to the both the officials but did not do so under the impression that being a senior staff of the TNPSC office Mr. Mahalingam might have had the knowledge of the consequences and he would have known the gravity of the incident I had to take his words. Had he not been posted I would not have been mislead\nThe said Ibrahim told me that six students told him that the question papers issued to them are for the afternoon examination as it seems that six question papers for the afternoon examination have been found mixed with the question papers for the forenoon examination.\nImmediately I got back the afternoon question papers from the six students and issued the question papers for the forenoon.\nThen I have decided to inform it to TNPSC office and it was written by Mahalingam as per my dictation. Mahalingam told me that if the said letter is sent the staff of TNPSC office will get some trouble that the name of Controller will be spoiled that the said Controller belongs to his community and that he is going to get the post of District Collector shortly.\nHence I have not informed it to TNPSC over phone.\nMahalingam also turned the letter written by him.\nHe also told me that he had got back the after noon question papers immediately as such there is no possibility for the students to read over it.\nNo problem will arise and pleaded me that do not inform it to any one\nI asked Mahalingam whether we will inform to him. But Mahalingam told me that it is not necessary to say this now as we have not given any report in the morning itself as such if we say it now it will became a mistake. Hence I have not informed it to him\nAfter about one month the Commission issued Memorandum dated 27.3.1990 for holding departmental inquiry against the appellant under Rule 17 b of the Tamil Nadu Civil Services Classification Control and Appeal Rules for short the Rules on the following charges 1. That Thiru R.\nMahalingam Assistant had gone to the examination hall unauthorisedly on the pretext of assisting the Chief Invigilator while he was on Unearned Leave on Private Affairs\nThat he had gone to the examination hall and take up the official work and acted as Invigilator while he was on leave. 3. That he had prevented the Chief Invigilator from sending a report to the Controller of Examinations about the distribution of afternoon question paper in the forenoon and the resultant leakage of question paper.\nBefore adverting to the allegations made in charges 1 and 2 I wish to inform you Sir Please refer our office letter No 377 Pl 90 dated 16.2.90 which is a letter appointing me as an Invigilator which was signed and issued by the competent authority\nI also found my name in the list sent to the Chief Invigilator\nThe chief Invigilator verified the list with the appointment letter issued by the office and permitted me to act as Invigilator.\nFor the third charge i.e resultant leakage of question paper was referred to police for investigation.\nit was stated before the Court in the counter affidavit that the Petitioner was interrogated in connection with mixing of question paper and not to the leakage of question paper.\nHence the office is fully aware that my presence in the examination hall was authorized one\nThereafter the Enquiry Officer submitted report holding the appellant guilty of all the charges.\nWhile the Chief Invigilator was apparently not at all interrogated in regard to the correctness of his statement the credibility of his report is doubtful.\nHowever without waiting for the decision of his representations the Secretary of the Commission passed order dated 10.10.1991 and imposed punishment of removal from service\nThe departmental appeal filed by the appellant was dismissed by the Chairman of the Commission vide order dated 14.8.1992. He reiterated the findings recorded by the Enquiry Officer and the Secretary that the appellant had unauthorisedly done the work of Invigilator and prevented the Chief Invigilator from reporting the matter to the Commission.\nThe appellant challenged the order of punishment and the appellate order in Writ Petition No19251 1992 but could not convince the learned Single Judge to quash orders dated 10.10.1991 and 14.8.1992\nThe writ appeal filed by him was dismissed by the Division Bench of the High Court which expressed concurrence with the learned Single Judge that the enquiry was held against the appellant in consonance with the rules of natural justice and the findings recorded by the Enquiry Officer were based on proper analysis of the records produced during the enquiry.\nThe scope of judicial review in matters involving challenge to the disciplinary action taken by the employer is very limited. The Courts are primarily concerned with the question whether the enquiry has been held by the competent authority in accordance with the prescribed procedure and whether the rules of natural justice have been followed. The Court can also consider whether there was some tangible evidence for proving the charge against the delinquent and such evidence reasonably supports the conclusions recorded by the competent authority", + "expert_4": "This appeal is directed against judgment dated 3.2.2010 of the Division Bench of the Madras High Court whereby the writ appeal filed by the appellant was dismissed and the order passed by the learned Single Judge negating his challenge to the order of punishment was upheld.\nThe appellant joined service as Junior Assistant in the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission for short the Commission in 1973. He was promoted as Assistant in 1975 and as Assistant Selection Grade in 1988.\nIn February 1990 the appellant was sanctioned unearned leave from 12.2.1990 to 25.2.1990 for private work.\nDuring that period P Section of the Commission is said to have directed him to work as Invigilator at Bharathiyar Women Arts College Chennai which was one of the centers for the written examination on 17.2.1990 and 18.2.1990 held for recruitment of Assistant Surgeons.\nIn the examination held on 17.2.1990 six candidates sitting in Hall No76 were given the question papers of the afternoon examination in the morning examination\nAs soon as the Chief Invigilator Shri Syed Abdul Kareem came to know about this he took back the question papers of the afternoon examination and issued the question papers meant for morning examination.\nThis incident was reported in the newspapers.\nThese six papers were kept in my personal custody till the end of the examination.\nWhen I wanted to inform the facts to the TNPSC office immediately the invigilator Thiru Mahalingam Assistant TNPSC office who was assisting me requested me not to inform since the papers were immediately received back from the candidates\nhe said that the staff attached to TNPSC office who were responsible for this mingling the question papers would be punished and the name of the TNPSC will be spoiled.\nSince he is a serviced employee of the TNPSC I had to take his advice considering that he is pleading knowing all pros and cons.\nThe after noon question papers bundle was opened at 1.50 p.m on 17.2.1990 by myself and two other invigilators Mr. R. Balan Assistant D.M.Es office and one Mr. N. R. Sundararaman Assistant KCH Madras. These papers were distributed to the candidates at 2 p.m there was no complaint about mingling or shortage of question papers.\nAt the close of examination myself and Thiru Mahalingam with the assistance of two staff of college packed the un used answer papers and unused question papers 64 question papers of FN session and 11 A.N.\nSession papers and another bundle of 71 AN session papers.\nWhile packing a lady sweeper brought certain question papers and handed over to the persons who were packing.\nImmediately these papers has also been packed along with the balance question papers.\nDuring end morning session the six candidates who were served the A.N session question papers were asked to wait and the answer papers were received back and they were requested to be seated in a separate room opposite to the Hall till the commencement of after noon session.\nThe candidates were seated in a small rook till the after session when Tiffin or coffee offered to them they refused to get.\nThe AN session question papers received back from the candidates six in no were kept in my pocket first and then kept in my bag after 2 p.m.\nThiru Gurumoorthy a Member of TNPSC visited the examination centre and met me and enquired about the conduct of the examination.\nThough I was prepared to inform the Member about the receipt of Mingling of question papers again Mr. Mahalingam stopped me and requested not to tell.\nAfter about some time the Member left the centre. At about 3.00 P.M one of the Under Secretaries of the TNPSC office visited the Examination Centre and took a written statement from me.\nThough I should have informed the fact to the both the officials but did not do so under the impression that being a senior staff of the TNPSC office Mr. Mahalingam might have had the knowledge of the consequences and he would have known the gravity of the incident I had to take his words. Had he not been posted I would not have been mislead.\nBut on 15.2.90 he visited my office at about 11.30 AM and informed me that he had been posted as Invigilator to Bharathi College for Women where I was posted as Chief Invigilator.\nHe assured me that he would assist me on 16.2.90 after noon also in arranging the examination halls.\nSo he did what he promised and after posting all the other invigilators to various halls I retained Mr. Mahalingam with me to assist so he was with me all along the day till I left the examination centre at about 6.45 pm on 17.2.90.\nThe list of invigilators posted to my centre does not contain the names of the three staff of TNPSC office who were posted as Invigilators. They are Mr. Mahalingam Mr. Sekarao and Mr. Udhaya Kumar.\nBut they are having their individual orders that too they did not handed over to me.\nThe absentees statement were also prepared by Mr. Mahalingam only.\nController of Examns 22.2.90 underlining is ours reproduced from the SLP paper book \n Inspector State Crime Investigation Department to whom the investigation of the criminal case was entrusted also recorded the statement of the Chief Invigilator on 26.2.1990.\nDuring the month of February 1990 an order from the office of TNPSC came to me on 14.2.90 to conduct the TNPSC Examination for Assistant Medical Officer post on 17.2.90 full day and 18.2.90 half day fore noon only .\nI went to TNPSC office on 15.2.90 and met the Superintendent of the concerned Section I do not remember his name in person.\nI told him that I am suffering from heart ailment as such it is not possible for me to conduct the examination and hence made a request to appoint some other person.\nHe told me that this order is passed by District Collector Chennai as such it is not possible for us to do anything and asked me to get the amount by sending a man with me.\nI got the cheque and came to him and asked a list of persons who are going to assist me.\nTNPSC gave 19 persons to assist me.\nBut certain persons informed me over phone at G.H that it is not possible for them to assist me.\nAgain I went to the TNPSC Office on 16.2.90 and informed the position to the concerned Superintendent\nHe told me that they had posted 5 persons to assist me from their section. Kindly conduct the examination with them and asked his Assistant by name Saveriyar to give me the names of 5 persons in writing. He gave me a list in his hand writing as 1 Udhayakumar 2 Sekaran 3 Mahalingam 4 Aasir and the name of another person not known but know the person.\nOn 16.2.90 Mahalingam came to my office at G.H at 12.00 hours and told me that he is on leave and studying for Group I examination but he will come and assist me.\nMahalingam is known to me from the year 1985 86 onwards.\nOn the next day that is on 17.2.90 I went to TNPSC office at 8.00 AM and got two bundles containing question papers by affixing seal on the cloth as 17.2.90 Forenoon 10.00 AM to 12.00 Noon as one bundle and 17.2.90 Afternoon 2.00 PM to 5 PM as another bundle and went Bharathi Womens College in an Auto and reached there at about 8.45 AM.\nMahalingam was waiting there 19 persons came there to assist me invigilators .\nI gave them answer sheets thread and white papers and send them to each and every hall.\nThen at 9.50 hours I took the question bundle for the forenoon and affixed my signature in the face slip of the said bundle in the presence of two invigilators 1 G.Balasubramaniam Assistant D.M.E Chennai 5 and 2 Aazir School Assistant Thayar Sahib Street Anna Salai Chennai 2 and also got their signature.\nThen I have ripped the seal of the bundle and got the signature of the said two persons in the paper inside the bundle and I have also put my signature.\nThen at 10 hours I gave the question papers to invigilators and instructed them to take the question papers to the respective halls.\nI have appointed Syed Ibrahim and Thiru N.R.Sundararaman as invigilators for hall No76.\nThe said Ibrahim told me that six students told him that the question papers issued to them are for the afternoon examination as it seems that six question papers for the afternoon examination have been found mixed with the question papers for the forenoon examination\nImmediately I went to that hall No 76 and made enquiry and came to know it as true.\nImmediately I got back the afternoon question papers from the six students and issued the question papers for the forenoon. I kept the said six question papers which are intended for the afternoon at my custody.\nThen I have decided to inform it to TNPSC office and it was written by Mahalingam as per my dictation.\nHence I have not informed it to TNPSC over phone.\nMahalingam also turned the letter written by him.\nHe also told me that he had got back the after noon question papers immediately as such there is no possibility for the students to read over it.\nNo problem will arise and pleaded me that do not inform it to any one.\nThen the examination was going on. I went around all the halls. No complaint received from the students.\nIt was written in the face slip of the forenoon bundle as 410 question papers. On counting it is found 412 question papers.\nI gave 339 persons from it and out of the remaining 75 64 question papers for forenoon and 9 for the afternoon. I kept the said question papers in a cover. At about 12 Noon one member of TNPSC Mr. Gurumurthi came there.\nHe asked me whether any problem. I asked Mahalingam whether we will inform to him. But Mahalingam told me that it is not necessary to say this now as we have not given any report in the morning itself as such if we say it now it will became a mistake. Hence I have not informed it to him.\nHe saw the afternoon bundle with the seal and he did not verify the forenoon question paper bundle and left away.\nAll the invigilators made a complaint to Gurumurthi that the amount paid to them is not sufficient. He gave a reply that we had already informed about it to the Government.\nThen at 2.00 PM Mr. Nithyanandam Under Secretary of TNPSC office came there. He also made enquiry about the examination.\nHe got a statement from me. I gave a report as nothing special.\nAt that time at about 1.50 Noon I have opened the afternoon bundle in the presence of 1 Balan and 2 Sundararaman in the face slip it is found as 17.2.90 2.00 PM to 5.00 PM and written as 410 Question papers and I got the signature from both of them and I have also affixed my signature. Then I gave the answer sheets and question papers to the invigilators and send them to the examination hall. Examination was over. There was no problem. \nAt 00 PM I have collected the answer sheets and the remaining question papers.\nAll the invigilators returned except Mahalingam. We made bundle of the answer sheets after counting. I kept the remaining question papers in a cover. At about 6.30 PM the sweeper handed over to me two question papers and I found some scribbling and I have kept that also in a cover and put Seal. I have kept the model question paper given to me in the said cover\nMahalingam went away after putting all these in an Auto.\nOne under Secretary was in the upstairs and I do not know his name. I have handed over the bundles to him for which he gave acknowledgement and I got it.\nI went to TNPSC Office on the next day 18.2.90 at 8.00 AM. They gave me the question papers at 8.20 AM. One Under Secretary came with me in the auto who got the bundles from me on 17.2.90 evening. Then Mahalingam came there and all invigilators came.\nI have sent the answer sheets to the respective halls.\nThen at 9.50 AM I have opened the bundle in the presence of two invigilators and the Under Secretary and in the label of the bundle it is written as 18.2.90 Forenoon 10.00 AM to 12 Noon and got the signature of two invigilators and I have also affixed my signature.\nThen I have opened the bundle and after counting it was 410 papers. I gave the required question papers at 10.00 Hours. On that day there was no problem in the examination.\nAt 12.00 Noon 1 have collected the answer sheets made bundle by affixing seal and took it TNPSC office by Auto and handed over it there and got the acknowledgement.\nAfter about one month the Commission issued Memorandum dated 27.3.1990 for holding departmental inquiry against the appellant under Rule 17 b of the Tamil Nadu Civil Services Classification Control and Appeal Rules for short the Rules on the following charges 1.\nIn his reply the appellant pointed out that his name did not figure in the first information report got registered with the police and the remand report and that the real culprits had already been apprehended.\nThe copies of two statements made by the Chief Invigilator were not supplied to the appellant and he was asked to make a statement by the Enquiry Officer.\nIn his statement dated 12.10.1990 the appellant denied all the allegations levelled against him.\nMy letter seeking permission to offer my explanation refused and directed me to appear for the oral enquiry.\nI have applied U.E.L on private affairs during February 1990.\nQue For how many days you have applied UEL on private affairs during February 1990 Ans I do not know.\nI have applied leave sufficiently in advance. But the leave sanction order was received during my leave period to my home.\nRegarding the first and second charges I wish to inform you that though the charges have been framed on two counts they have been famed so on the sole ground that my presence in the examination hall unauthorized one.\nPlease refer our office letter No 377 Pl 90 dated 16.2.90 which is a letter appointing me as an Invigilator which was signed and issued by the competent authority.\nI also found my name in the list sent to the Chief Invigilator.\nThe chief Invigilator verified the list with the appointment letter issued by the office and permitted me to act as Invigilator.\nI have received in person. Que For what reason you have come to office though you were on leave at that time Ans\nI used to visit University Library during my leave period I have also happened to visit to office to see whether any letter was received to my name.\nI have been instructed to do the distribution of main and additional answer books and collection of answer books from each hall except question papers.\nFor the third charge i.e resultant leakage of question paper was referred to police for investigation.\nMoreover the third charge has not been pressed in the office Memorandum dated 11.10.90.\nWhen I moved the court for anticipatory bail it was stated before the Court in the counter affidavit that the Petitioner was interrogated in connection with mixing of question paper and not to the leakage of question paper.\nSecondly when I was seeking permission to officer my explanation in my letter dated 22.8.90 it was misconstrued by the office that I have submitted my explanation vide its letter dated 11.9.90.\nIn my letter dated 18.9.90 I have also requested to state the provision of rules relating to departmental action has nothing to do with the filing of charge sheet or receipt of police report in the matter relating to leakage of question papers. This has not been informed to me.\nAgain in my letter dated 22.8.90 I requested the office to state whether the proposed enquiry is in super session of the earlier orders of the office calling for an explanation or it is part and parcel of these orders calling for an explanation or it is a separate one nothing to do with the charges. My request has not been answered.\nIn the charge memorandum framed against Thiru Savariar it was stated how the appointment order was issue to him even though he was on leave. Hence the office is fully aware that my presence in the examination hall was authorized one.\nA notice of the proposed enquiry was given only a day in advance. Ample opportunity was not given.\nQue Are you satisfied with the opportunity given to you during enquiry to defend your case Ans So far as the conduct of the oral enquiry is concerned I am fully satisfied.\nEnquiry Officer submitted report holding the appellant guilty of all the charges.\nA copy of the enquiry report was made available to the appellant and he was asked to submit further written statement of defence.\nHe submitted another representation on 4.2.1991 to the Deputy Secretary Admn of the Commission.\nKindly refer to the report of the enquiry officer which appears to have been made out entirely relying upon the report Dated 22nd February 1990 of the Chief Invigilator miserably superseding the factual evidences deposed by me at the oral enquiry.\nthe credibility of his report is doubtful.\nthe Chief Invigilator before permitting me to take up the Invigilation Duty did verify with his papers and records and ticked against my name found therein among other personnel of the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission appointed as Invigilators by the Office\nIn response to the appellants request the Commission made available the statement of the Chief Invigilator recorded by the Controller of Examination.\nappellant submitted application dated 18.4.1991 to the Deputy Secretary Administration for grant of permission to cross examine the Chief Invigilator the officer of the Commission in whose presence request is sought to have been made to the Chief Invigilator not to report the matter to the Commission and the person who appointed him along with others as Invigilators.\nHe also submitted representation dated 20.5.1991 to the Chairman of the Commission and sought his intervention for ensuring compliance of the rules of natural justice.\nHowever without waiting for the decision of his representations the Secretary of the Commission passed order dated 10.10.1991 and imposed punishment of removal from service.\nThe departmental appeal filed by the appellant was dismissed by the Chairman of the Commission vide order dated 14.8.1992.\nHe reiterated the findings recorded by the Enquiry Officer and the Secretary that the appellant had unauthorisedly done the work of Invigilator and prevented the Chief Invigilator from reporting the matter to the Commission.\nThe appellant challenged the order of punishment and the appellate order in Writ Petition No19251 1992 but could not convince the learned Single Judge to quash orders dated 10.10.1991 and 14.8.1992.\nThe writ appeal filed by him was dismissed by the Division Bench of the High Court\nThe Courts are primarily concerned with the question whether the enquiry has been held by the competent authority in accordance with the prescribed procedure and whether the rules of natural justice have been followed.\nThe Court can also consider whether there was some tangible evidence for proving the charge against the delinquent and such evidence reasonably supports the conclusions recorded by the competent authority.\nIf the Court comes to the conclusion that the enquiry was held in consonance with the prescribed procedure and the rules of natural justice and the conclusion recorded by the disciplinary authority is supported by some tangible evidence then there is no scope for interference with the discretion exercised by the disciplinary authority to impose the particular punishment except when the same is found to be wholly disproportionate to the misconduct found proved or shocks the conscience of the Court.\nRule 17 b which contains the procedure for holding enquiry reads as under 17 a xxx xxx xxx b i Without prejudice to the provisions of the Public Servants Inquiries Act 1850 Central Act XXXVII of 1850 in every case where it is proposed to impose on a member of a service or on a person holding a Civil Post under the State any of the penalties specified in items iv vi vii and viii in rule 8 the grounds on which it is proposed to take action shall be reduced to the form of a definite charge or charges which shall be communicated to the person charged together with a statement of the allegation on which each charge is based and of any other circumstances which it is proposed to take into consideration in passing orders on the case.\nHe shall be required within a reasonable time to put in a written statement of his defence and to state whether he desires an oral inquiry or to be heard in person or both.\nAn oral inquiry shall be held if such an inquiry is desired by the person charged or is directed by the authority concerned.\nEven if a person charged has waived an oral inquiry such inquiry shall be held by the authority concerned in respect of charges which are not admitted by the person charged and which can be proved only through the evidence of witnesses.\nAt that inquiry oral evidence shall be heard as to such of the allegations as are not admitted and the person charged shall be entitled to cross examine the witnesses to give evidence in person and to have such witnesses called as he may wish provided that the officer conducting the inquiry may for special and sufficient reason to be recorded in writing refuse to call a witness.\nWhether or not the person charged desired or had an oral inquiry he shall be heard in person at any stage if he so desires before passing of final orders.\nA report of the inquiry or personal hearing as the case may be shall be prepared by the authority holding the inquiry or personal hearing whether or not such authority is competent to impose the penalty.\nSuch report shall contain a sufficient record of the evidence if any and a statement of the findings and the grounds thereof.\nWhenever any inquiring authority after having heard and recorded the whole or any part of the evidence in an inquiry ceases to exercise jurisdiction therein and is succeeded by another inquiring authority which has and which exercises such jurisdiction the inquiring authority so succeeding may act on the evidence so recorded by its predecessor or partly recorded by its predecessor and partly recorded by itself Provided that if the succeeding inquiring authority is of the opinion that further examination of any of the witnesses whose evidence has already been recorded is necessary in the interest of justice it may recall examine cross examine and re examine any such witnesses as hereinbefore provided ii After the inquiry or personal hearing referred to in clause i has been completed the authority competent to impose the penalty specified in that clause is of the opinion on the basis of the evidence adduced during the inquiry that any of the penalties specified therein should be imposed on the Government Servant it shall make an order imposing such penalty and it shall not be necessary to give the person charged any opportunity of making representation on the penalty proposed to be imposed xxx xxx xxx\n An analysis of the above reproduced rule makes it clear that holding of an oral enquiry is sine qua non for recording a finding by the enquiring authority and the report of enquiry must contain sufficient record of evidence and statement of the findings together with grounds thereof.\nThe main allegations leveled against the appellant were that he had unauthorisedly worked as Invigilator and prevented the Chief Invigilator Syed Abdul Kareem from sending report about the incident involving mixing of the question papers of two sessions.\nOn behalf of the Commission oral evidence is said to have been adduced to substantiate the allegations leveled against the appellant but neither the report of the Enquiry Officer nor the orders passed by the Secretary and the Chairman of the Commission make a mention of that evidence.\nAs a matter of fact neither of them relied upon the same for recording a finding of guilty against the appellant\nRather the Enquiry Officer and the two authorities relied upon the portions of the statement made by the Chief Invigilator before the Controller of Examinations and the Inspector completely ignoring that it was he who had asked for substitute Invigilators because those already nominated had conveyed their unwillingness to work and that in the statements made before the Controller of Examinations and the Inspector Crime Investigation Department the Chief Invigilator categorically stated that the appellant had produced the order by which he had been nominated to work as Invigilator and he had no role in bringing the question papers from the office of the Commission or distribution thereof.\nThese errors and omissions on the part of the learned Single Judge and the Division Bench in our considered view are fatal to their concurrence with the finding recorded by the Enquiry Officer the Secretary and the Chairman of the Commission that the appellant had unauthorisedly worked as Invigilator on 17.2.1990 and 18.2.1990.\nAt the cost of repetition it deserves to be mentioned that the appellant had no role to play in the matter of mixing of the question papers of the afternoon examination with the morning examination.\nRather the statements made by the Chief Invigilator before the Inspector Crime Investigation Department and the Controller of Examinations clearly show that he had collected the question papers from the office of the Commission that the seals were opened at the examination center in the presence of two persons and the appellant had not played any role in the exercise.", + "expert_5": "When I wanted to inform the facts to the TNPSC office immediately the invigilator Thiru Mahalingam Assistant TNPSC office who was assisting me requested me not to inform since the papers were immediately received back from the candidates. Further he said that the staff attached to TNPSC office who were responsible for this mingling the question papers would be punished and the name of the TNPSC will be spoiled.\nAgain I did not inform him the fact of the mingle of the question papers in the morning session at the insistence of the same person Mr. Mahalingm.\nBut on 15.2.90 he visited my office at about 11.30 AM and informed me that he had been posted as Invigilator to Bharathi College for Women where I was posted as Chief Invigilator.\nI retained Mr. Mahalingam with me to assist so he was with me all along the day till I left the examination centre at about 6.45 pm on 17.2.90\nHe told me that they had posted 5 persons to assist me from their section. Kindly conduct the examination with them and asked his Assistant by name Saveriyar to give me the names of 5 persons in writing. He gave me a list in his hand writing as 1 Udhayakumar 2 Sekaran 3 Mahalingam 4 Aasir and the name of another person not known but know the person.\nOn 16.2.90 Mahalingam came to my office at G.H at 12.00 hours and told me that he is on leave and studying for Group I examination but he will come and assist me.\nThen at 9.50 hours I took the question bundle for the forenoon and affixed my signature in the face slip of the said bundle in the presence of two invigilators 1 G.Balasubramaniam Assistant D.M.E Chennai 5 and 2 Aazir School Assistant Thayar Sahib Street Anna Salai Chennai 2 and also got their signature. Then I have ripped the seal of the bundle and got the signature of the said two persons in the paper inside the bundle and I have also put my signature.\nI have appointed Syed Ibrahim and Thiru N.R.Sundararaman as invigilators for hall No76. The said Ibrahim told me that six students told him that the question papers issued to them are for the afternoon examination as it seems that six question papers for the afternoon examination have been found mixed with the question papers for the forenoon examination.\nI have been instructed to do the distribution of main and additional answer books and collection of answer books from each hall except question papers. Que Have you been allotted to the work of distribution of question paper to each hall Ans No.\nHowever without waiting for the decision of his representations the Secretary of the Commission passed order dated 10.10.1991 and imposed punishment of removal from service.\nThe Courts are primarily concerned with the question whether the enquiry has been held by the competent authority in accordance with the prescribed procedure and whether the rules of natural justice have been followed.\nThe Court can also consider whether there was some tangible evidence for proving the charge against the delinquent and such evidence reasonably supports the conclusions recorded by the competent authority.\nRather the Enquiry Officer and the two authorities relied upon the portions of the statement made by the Chief Invigilator before the Controller of Examinations and the Inspector completely ignoring that it was he who had asked for substitute Invigilators because those already nominated had conveyed their unwillingness to work\nhe had no role in bringing the question papers from the office of the Commission or distribution thereof.\nthe question papers etc had been brought by him i.e the Chief Invigilator from the office of the Commission and opened seals in the presence of two other invigilators .\nThe High Court also did not pay due weightage to the fact that the appellant had not handled the question papers at any stage and he had no role in distribution of wrong question papers to six candidates.\nRather the statements made by the Chief Invigilator before the Inspector Crime Investigation Department and the Controller of Examinations clearly show that he had collected the question papers from the office of the Commission that the seals were opened at the examination center in the presence of two persons and the appellant had not played any role in the exercise." + } + } + }, + "bail": { + "Bail Application_473_202129-01-20213091": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2568_202030-09-20202372": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4485_201927-08-2019132": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1603_202105-03-20211467": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2710_202107-04-2021161": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1309_202027-07-2020873": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1156_202102-03-20211629": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_670_202102-03-20211620": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1719_202126-02-20211838": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4011_202007-12-2020769": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3630_202011-11-20201135": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7150_201913-12-2019581": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2287_202131-03-2021468": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1183_202028-07-2020813": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_417_202023-01-20201902": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1675_202014-09-20202706": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1750_202018-08-2020304": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2484_202131-03-2021474": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4132_201930-07-20191264": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_55_202107-01-20213931": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4111_201931-07-20191194": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_402_202129-01-20213084": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2823_201901-08-20191099": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_727_202016-07-20201157": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5621_201904-10-20193290": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5548_201930-09-20193490": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_559_202105-02-20212829": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4279_202016-12-2020265": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4070_202014-12-2020379": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1838_202116-03-20211049": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4355_201913-08-2019687": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2117_202122-03-2021766": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2618_202005-10-20202197": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4986_201904-09-20194816": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1913_202115-03-20211125": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3698_201918-07-20191767": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_93_202007-01-20202475": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_889_202110-02-20212607": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4499_202019-01-20213512": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1979_202117-03-2021983": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2336_202122-03-2021779": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3347_201916-07-20191862": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_277_202013-01-20202361": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1998_202025-08-202078": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_794_202011-02-20201008": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1568_202110-03-20211220": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_283_202013-01-20202368": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2307_201920-05-20193810": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1311_202016-07-20201185": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5423_201927-09-20193597": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2688_201903-06-20193349": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3739_201923-07-20191549": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_755_202013-02-2020915": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_883_202116-02-20212354": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3132_202009-10-20202029": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5855_201918-10-20192773": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1311_202102-03-20211635": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2832_202127-04-202111": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1768_202004-08-2020643": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1603_202005-08-2020587": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3345_202022-10-20201638": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2417_202103-04-2021315": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5800_201931-10-20192229": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4528_201927-08-2019133": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3892_202021-12-2020133": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5066_201921-09-20193810": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5430_201911-10-20193081": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2096_202123-03-2021684": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6320_201907-11-20192011": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3883_202027-11-2020873": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3834_201931-07-20191167": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1180_202117-02-20212303": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_674_202104-02-20212870": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3864_202009-12-2020689": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1164_202124-02-20211955": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2804_201918-07-20191749": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6081_201931-10-20192241": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1788_202021-08-2020167": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1327_202028-07-2020824": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1345_202105-03-20211448": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3936_201902-08-20191062": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4008_201901-08-20191119": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6921_201930-11-20191122": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_411_202021-01-20202020": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5788_201914-11-20191769": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3532_202004-11-20201347": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3735_201924-07-20191511": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2197_202014-09-20202714": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4129_201914-08-2019603": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7391_201920-12-2019153": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1350_202022-07-20201019": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5552_201930-09-20193492": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1000_202118-02-20212211": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_459_202006-02-20201325": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_923_202115-02-20212416": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3023_201903-06-20193360": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_371_202020-02-2020641": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_171_202012-02-2020983": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3874_201927-07-20191376": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2479_202126-03-2021549": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6610_201926-11-20191272": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_78_202012-02-2020973": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4451_201914-08-2019629": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4196_201906-08-2019975": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3223_202022-10-20201625": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_618_202127-01-20213220": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2809_202006-10-20202146": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4880_201918-09-20193971": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2061_202008-09-20202838": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_280_202109-02-20212650": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5891_201905-11-20192074": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4100_201901-08-20191126": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3840_201918-07-20191776": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4421_201916-08-2019559": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6214_201913-11-20191824": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7312_201916-12-2019329": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2226_202124-03-2021624": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4165_202016-12-2020252": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4004_201930-07-20191253": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1623_202020-08-2020227": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4067_201927-07-20191384": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_414_202024-01-20201860": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4983_201917-09-20194043": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3044_201921-06-20192944": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1151_202101-03-20211710": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6181_201907-11-20191996": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4145_201917-08-2019496": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1131_202112-02-20212482": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3476_201909-08-2019756": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3447_201925-06-20192879": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3486_201914-08-2019592": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2435_202010-09-20202798": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5949_201901-11-20192191": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1205_202122-02-20212097": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1854_202021-08-2020170": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5310_201916-10-20192884": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4404_201920-08-2019400": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2525_202101-04-2021431": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3203_202014-10-20201920": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2509_202008-09-20202861": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2387_202031-08-20203082": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1710_202003-09-20202975": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2942_202001-10-20202337": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5393_201925-09-20193661": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1413_202022-07-20201021": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4001_201929-08-20199": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1200_202031-07-2020659": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3435_202028-10-20201533": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3187_202005-11-20201279": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5480_201914-10-20193017": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_992_202109-02-20212684": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3610_201927-07-20191358": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3501_202029-10-20201476": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2960_201901-07-20192674": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1140_202119-02-20212150": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2727_201920-05-20193829": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1268_202014-07-20201260": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7311_201923-12-201957": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1036_202027-07-2020860": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_449_202005-03-2020237": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2728_201920-05-20193830": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5280_201911-10-20193075": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4049_201913-08-2019662": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_165_202119-01-20213487": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_114_202024-01-20201844": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3601_202006-11-20201263": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1545_202021-08-2020154": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4970_201913-09-20194428": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2229_202126-03-2021529": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_726_202004-07-20201396": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_770_202004-07-20201398": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_268_202024-01-20201853": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1958_202023-09-20202525": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2389_201922-05-20193730": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1162_202122-02-20212090": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2893_201914-06-20193092": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6985_201917-12-2019245": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3960_202025-11-2020920": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2504_202109-04-202157": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3460_202004-11-20201329": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4069_201922-08-2019283": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2041_202122-03-2021760": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2843_201910-06-20193187": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4147_202015-12-2020316": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3492_201904-07-20192583": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_250_202102-02-20212928": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3709_201919-08-2019445": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1243_202014-07-20201259": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4328_202015-01-20213635": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_363_202021-01-20202011": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_890_202123-02-20212000": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2864_201928-06-20192755": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4076_201909-08-2019766": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2796_202109-04-202173": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6784_201930-11-20191114": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7225_201901-01-20202717": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_83_202014-01-20202268": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_820_202117-02-20212273": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2630_202009-10-20202011": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3292_202029-10-20201450": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1058_202014-07-20201239": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5263_201927-09-20193580": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1002_202007-07-20201369": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_826_202125-02-20211873": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2921_201906-06-20193279": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4516_202011-01-20213864": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2886_201924-06-20192893": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1806_202110-03-20211245": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7167_201912-12-2019639": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2138_202126-03-2021517": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5391_201924-09-20193722": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2074_202119-03-2021870": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4863_201927-08-2019154": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5933_201917-10-20192842": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1351_202109-03-20211296": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6101_201922-10-20192616": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_271_202117-02-20212250": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4307_202023-12-202050": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6137_201905-11-20192080": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5231_201924-09-20193705": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7563_201903-01-20202646": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2424_202022-09-20202583": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4025_202009-12-2020705": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4473_201924-08-2019242": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3612_202017-11-20201063": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2064_202014-09-20202709": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3847_202007-12-2020757": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4329_201901-08-20191136": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_680_202004-02-20201433": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7269_201906-01-20202530": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_511_202024-01-20201871": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_663_202108-02-20212722": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6516_201930-11-20191105": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3954_202027-11-2020885": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_222_202119-01-20213495": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_444_202020-01-20202092": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_630_202015-02-2020806": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3244_202016-10-20201835": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_664_202030-01-20201628": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_196_202018-02-2020730": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2679_202008-10-20202049": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6635_201902-12-20191049": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_151_202112-01-20213765": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6398_201918-11-20191600": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_627_202003-02-20201472": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1494_202109-04-202145": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_344_202125-01-20213257": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3678_201918-07-20191764": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2355_201904-06-20193305": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2288_201927-05-20193585": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_229_202118-01-20213540": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1147_202117-02-20212300": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3502_202029-10-20201477": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1224_202005-08-2020570": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6429_201926-11-20191260": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7350_201902-01-20202680": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1492_202030-07-2020725": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2824_202007-10-20202098": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1669_202125-02-20211924": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4260_202022-12-2020100": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3119_201920-07-20191650": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5522_201910-10-20193161": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5886_201922-10-20192601": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_170_202017-02-2020774": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2893_202129-04-20216": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2611_202008-10-20202048": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4643_201904-09-20194799": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4932_201913-09-20194425": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_547_202004-03-2020294": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5595_201904-11-20192130": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1066_202126-02-20211802": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5077_201912-09-20194530": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7099_201916-12-2019309": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2257_202103-04-2021303": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2726_202022-09-20202597": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3707_201918-07-20191768": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1738_202109-03-20211312": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_773_202011-02-20201005": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1079_202022-07-20201006": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5075_201911-09-20194580": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5699_201911-10-20193098": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5248_201925-10-20192387": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_287_202116-01-20213575": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_970_202009-07-20201323": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4134_202014-12-2020387": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3629_201927-07-20191359": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6414_201914-11-20191787": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1477_202104-03-20211542": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5206_201924-09-20193702": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3496_202006-11-20201255": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2339_202122-03-2021782": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_592_202128-01-20213159": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3797_202025-11-2020906": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2396_201920-05-20193814": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1871_202112-03-20211170": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2204_202002-09-20203020": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3329_202010-11-20201163": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2314_202002-09-20203031": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3350_201905-07-20192520": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_273_202013-01-20202357": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5485_201910-10-20193157": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_460_202121-01-20213376": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2045_202014-08-2020393": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1499_202112-03-20211165": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3458_202029-10-20201468": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1757_202115-03-20211109": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1230_202116-02-20212398": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_92_202008-01-20202447": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4389_202018-12-2020195": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_590_202023-07-2020949": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3813_201902-08-20191057": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_276_202119-01-20213500": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_223_202015-02-2020835": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3084_202009-10-20202028": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1221_202116-02-20212392": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4346_202012-01-20213784": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5620_201904-10-20193289": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_319_202022-01-20201947": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6435_201907-11-20192015": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6061_201902-11-20192159": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6997_201903-12-20191023": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1765_202020-08-2020231": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2448_201920-05-20193817": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_892_202101-03-20211703": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4388_201908-08-2019874": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5669_201918-10-20192757": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_801_202030-07-2020697": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4147_201908-08-2019845": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_583_202029-01-20201676": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_786_202024-02-2020573": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2593_202109-04-202160": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_240_202018-01-20202145": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1702_202110-03-20211233": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2_202018-01-20202123": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6586_201921-11-20191474": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_82_202013-01-20202329": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6089_201906-11-20192040": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3295_202020-10-20201722": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2562_202010-09-20202805": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2377_202005-09-20202920": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4177_201925-07-20191490": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4211_201916-08-2019545": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2007_202118-03-2021919": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5282_201924-09-20193715": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1530_202005-08-2020584": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1284_202122-02-20212102": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_404_202022-01-20201959": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3955_201927-07-20191379": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_953_202111-02-20212530": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3101_202022-10-20201620": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_804_202108-02-20212733": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3342_202027-10-20201558": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_252_202019-02-2020682": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3967_201930-07-20191251": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6329_201929-11-20191139": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3155_201904-07-20192571": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4106_202009-12-2020726": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_211_202005-03-2020227": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6313_201907-11-20192008": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1317_202110-03-20211217": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_375_202127-01-20213206": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6468_201915-11-20191737": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1450_202029-07-2020780": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_18_202012-02-2020968": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5937_201918-10-20192781": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_190_202018-01-20202137": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2547_202023-09-20202543": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_333_202113-01-20213713": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_334_202113-01-20213714": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1449_202119-03-2021843": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_772_202109-02-20212673": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5490_201902-11-20192144": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6580_201926-11-20191270": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2306_202101-04-2021420": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2961_201902-07-20192642": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5655_201926-10-20192338": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_868_202112-02-20212465": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1689_202004-08-2020637": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1850_202118-03-2021910": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_68_202007-02-20201310": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4371_202011-01-20213845": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6523_201915-11-20191744": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_942_202117-02-20212284": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1383_202104-03-20211537": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2694_201919-06-20192978": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2988_201906-06-20193284": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2190_202024-08-2020133": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2358_202023-09-20202532": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_250_202021-01-20201998": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1242_202031-07-2020662": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2507_202011-09-20202753": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2408_202004-09-20202955": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1049_202017-07-20201112": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1972_202116-03-20211058": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6725_201925-11-20191339": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_504_202130-01-20213050": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1869_202024-09-20202474": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2062_202124-03-2021620": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6434_201916-11-20191668": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4187_202023-12-202038": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7083_201907-12-2019841": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2420_202030-09-20202357": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1640_202005-08-2020591": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1473_202006-08-2020533": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2188_202027-08-20203141": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4770_201905-09-20194749": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_664_202018-03-202015": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4443_201928-08-201970": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_931_202116-02-20212359": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3761_201908-07-20192423": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7079_201905-12-2019914": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_94_202118-01-20213535": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_190_202012-02-2020985": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_839_202108-02-20212734": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3811_201922-07-20191616": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3194_201924-06-20192900": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4826_201925-09-20193640": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2603_202105-04-2021255": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2847_201927-06-20192790": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3462_202004-11-20201331": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2314_202126-03-2021534": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_807_202117-02-20212269": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4112_201931-07-20191195": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3652_202003-11-20201403": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_420_202101-02-20212989": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1070_202022-07-20201005": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4425_202015-01-20213638": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1220_202010-07-20201314": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2729_201920-05-20193831": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3455_202022-10-20201647": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_113_202115-01-20213613": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_197_202030-01-20201604": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1794_202118-03-2021908": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3313_202028-10-20201521": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6615_201929-11-20191145": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1483_202005-08-2020580": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3980_202009-12-2020699": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2699_202025-09-20202445": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_823_202030-07-2020699": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_977_202014-07-20201233": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2605_202028-10-20201504": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6731_201923-11-20191399": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2768_202003-10-20202260": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1414_202028-07-2020829": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1820_202012-08-2020436": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4168_202009-12-2020735": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6805_201930-11-20191117": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3743_202012-11-20201100": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1012_202116-02-20212366": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_448_202013-03-202076": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2901_202007-10-20202105": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_136_202023-01-20201897": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2202_202026-08-202040": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_667_202105-02-20212835": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1749_202106-03-20211402": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6831_201926-11-20191283": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_190_202119-01-20213489": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2166_202028-10-20201503": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2254_202126-03-2021532": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4353_202013-01-20213718": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_883_202116-02-20212355": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_796_202102-02-20212947": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4096_202007-12-2020775": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2500_201918-05-20193866": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1005_202117-02-20212293": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3415_202027-10-20201565": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_579_202130-01-20213057": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6604_201923-11-20191383": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5171_201923-09-20193766": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_535_202013-02-2020911": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1379_202023-07-2020977": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5383_201910-10-20193153": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2913_201914-06-20193093": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2077_202118-03-2021923": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4101_201929-07-20191325": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_307_202020-01-20202077": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2958_201918-06-20193018": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3948_201916-07-20191914": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3980_201920-07-20191674": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3629_202010-11-20201181": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_938_202002-07-20201409": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4441_202025-01-20213264": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5584_201910-10-20193171": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6591_201909-12-2019775": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_519_202012-03-2020102": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3397_202014-12-2020349": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6171_201906-11-20192042": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2140_202004-09-20202943": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_109_202014-01-20202270": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4449_202019-01-20213511": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_885_202111-02-20212526": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1608_202102-03-20211657": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4173_201901-08-20191132": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_800_202004-07-20201399": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1666_202125-02-20211921": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_873_202112-02-20212466": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_196_202112-01-20213771": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1847_202020-08-2020235": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1069_202118-02-20212217": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4646_201929-08-201924": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3279_202023-10-20201587": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2542_201901-06-20193377": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4151_201908-08-2019847": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2739_202003-10-20202257": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_706_202005-02-20201389": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2588_201905-07-20192494": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1199_202125-02-20211893": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_671_202019-03-20202": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1193_202022-07-20201010": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1916_202116-03-20211052": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2770_201901-06-20193384": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2175_202022-09-20202577": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_331_202122-01-20213301": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_837_202122-02-20212075": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1393_202012-08-2020423": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1017_202118-02-20212212": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_80_202011-02-20201027": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3802_202019-11-20201034": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6866_201907-12-2019828": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_674_202006-08-2020516": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3991_201907-08-2019900": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_320_202119-01-20213503": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3935_202011-12-2020663": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4164_201907-08-2019905": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3755_201908-07-20192418": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7184_201917-12-2019259": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3665_201926-07-20191422": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3489_201902-08-20191050": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5243_201923-09-20193776": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5113_201918-09-20193982": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4474_201924-08-2019243": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1638_202006-08-2020542": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1338_202027-07-2020876": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5681_201924-10-20192473": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_518_202021-01-20202027": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2131_202003-09-20202980": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1526_202125-02-20211917": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_421_202130-01-20213048": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4246_202022-12-202098": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1692_202105-03-20211480": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_228_202015-02-2020836": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4488_201914-08-2019630": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5521_201910-10-20193159": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4143_202007-12-2020779": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_484_202024-02-2020603": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6328_201915-11-20191723": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5865_201917-10-20192832": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4447_201919-08-2019461": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_187_202018-02-2020728": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3968_201926-07-20191442": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7093_201913-12-2019576": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4384_201913-08-2019692": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1291_202118-02-20212226": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1467_202106-03-20211394": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_801_202117-02-20212268": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_722_202004-02-20201438": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1811_202110-03-20211246": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2189_202117-03-2021995": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_533_202022-07-2020994": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6695_201922-11-20191441": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4994_201913-09-20194431": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3747_201929-07-20191312": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_293_202024-02-2020587": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1890_202104-03-20211557": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2530_202021-09-20202646": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_911_202031-07-2020656": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1920_202119-03-2021862": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4477_201912-09-20194490": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1696_202026-08-202019": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2936_202009-10-20202015": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2090_202119-03-2021872": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_281_202105-02-20212819": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4148_201908-08-2019846": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4214_201903-08-20191030": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3412_202020-10-20201729": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2014_202109-03-20211327": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_587_202029-01-20201677": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5597_201905-10-20193217": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2316_202125-03-2021594": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2902_202015-10-20201856": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5034_201911-09-20194575": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_520_202129-01-20213100": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_277_202125-01-20213254": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4039_202009-12-2020713": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7541_201903-01-20202642": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2196_202117-03-2021999": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1104_202013-07-20201277": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4625_201907-09-20194626": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5832_201917-10-20192828": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2376_202005-09-20202919": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_217_202014-02-2020889": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6682_201923-11-20191393": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1813_202109-03-20211319": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5445_201930-09-20193481": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_214_202102-02-20212927": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5215_201925-09-20193646": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_906_202031-08-20203064": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_680_202118-02-20212196": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2008_202021-08-2020188": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2693_202014-09-20202735": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_979_202007-07-20201367": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4012_201931-07-20191180": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7113_201917-12-2019248": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2075_202019-08-2020289": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2205_202101-04-2021415": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1363_202007-08-2020482": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3175_201919-06-20193003": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5375_201901-10-20193397": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1149_202008-07-20201357": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7458_201906-01-20202544": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4062_201913-08-2019665": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3275_201920-07-20191651": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4761_201929-08-201941": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1301_202117-02-20212313": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1410_202125-02-20211904": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_591_202103-02-20212895": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_64_202010-02-20201091": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3740_201922-07-20191611": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3288_202022-10-20201630": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_410_202021-01-20202019": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3933_201925-07-20191487": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_507_202130-01-20213052": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1928_202120-03-2021813": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2298_202107-04-2021142": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_707_202004-02-20201434": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5757_201903-10-20193361": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1475_202005-08-2020577": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1137_202014-07-20201246": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6640_201922-11-20191435": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5844_201911-10-20193105": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3825_201917-07-20191827": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5309_201921-09-20193828": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2714_201904-07-20192566": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2899_201906-06-20193269": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3114_202016-10-20201827": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2562_202102-04-2021391": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3239_201909-07-20192358": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1115_202016-07-20201171": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6312_201916-12-2019289": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1962_202125-03-2021578": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6134_201902-11-20192163": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5703_201905-10-20193224": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_611_202127-01-20213217": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2319_202103-04-2021308": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_220_202011-02-20201036": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2831_202127-04-202110": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2809_202127-04-20219": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5696_201917-10-20192819": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3142_202017-10-20201786": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5088_201927-09-20193571": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5267_201918-09-20193994": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1323_202030-07-2020714": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2798_201911-06-20193152": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1047_202016-07-20201168": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5975_201905-11-20192075": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7128_201910-12-2019759": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2420_201907-06-20193220": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3379_202023-10-20201595": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_644_202109-02-20212659": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5324_201925-09-20193659": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3561_201916-07-20191872": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3782_202001-12-2020837": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2411_202124-03-2021627": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5067_201920-09-20193871": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_555_202006-03-2020198": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5200_201916-09-20194128": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2330_202126-03-2021535": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_128_202120-01-20213418": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3814_201926-07-20191431": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7493_201929-01-20201692": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3725_202012-11-20201092": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_355_202024-01-20201857": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1902_202020-08-2020242": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_677_202102-02-20212945": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3430_202029-10-20201462": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5237_201927-09-20193575": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2792_201901-06-20193385": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1816_202106-03-20211403": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5148_201913-09-20194452": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4361_202013-01-20213720": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1530_202102-03-20211651": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7120_201907-12-2019843": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_527_202027-01-20201807": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1263_202023-07-2020968": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3097_201924-06-20192897": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2237_202031-08-20203075": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2640_202023-09-20202552": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_325_202113-01-20213710": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3575_201915-07-20191965": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5351_201927-09-20193592": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2045_201902-07-20192635": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2726_201920-05-20193828": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2390_202001-09-20203056": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_295_202024-02-2020588": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1706_202031-07-2020682": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2178_202126-03-2021522": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_753_202106-02-20212791": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3688_202009-11-20201209": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1665_202125-02-20211920": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_948_202108-02-20212738": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3233_201901-07-20192684": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4419_201921-08-2019343": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3413_202023-10-20201596": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3403_202027-10-20201563": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6352_201907-11-20192013": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_407_202005-02-20201380": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1211_202116-02-20212382": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5397_201928-09-20193533": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2606_202001-10-20202309": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3745_201927-07-20191360": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2093_202107-04-2021137": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1229_202116-02-20212397": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_766_202016-07-20201158": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3969_201914-08-2019600": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5279_201924-09-20193714": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5190_201910-10-20193148": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7180_201917-12-2019253": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3636_202020-11-2020989": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_853_202117-02-20212277": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_833_202016-07-20201148": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5871_201907-11-20191983": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1181_202013-07-20201279": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2889_201907-06-20193232": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_547_202111-02-20212513": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_355_202122-01-20213303": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2691_202003-10-20202253": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7437_201902-01-20202686": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1028_202013-07-20201266": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5526_201915-10-20192948": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1383_202023-07-2020978": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5795_201904-10-20193299": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3111_202014-10-20201906": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5433_201921-09-20193834": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5086_201924-09-20193698": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2232_202027-08-20203145": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2336_202008-09-20202842": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6048_201925-10-20192414": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_278_202025-02-2020527": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_899_202116-02-20212356": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_816_202004-08-2020612": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7438_201902-01-20202687": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_323_202004-03-2020279": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3166_202015-10-20201877": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6872_201907-12-2019829": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2886_202008-10-20202055": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3883_201925-07-20191476": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1206_202014-07-20201255": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4033_202014-12-2020371": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7380_201923-12-201964": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_741_202006-02-20201334": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4026_201906-08-2019966": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1501_202013-08-2020400": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7036_201904-12-2019972": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2431_202109-04-202154": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_415_202029-01-20201662": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_197_202010-02-20201101": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_63_202002-03-2020362": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1673_202125-02-20211928": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6029_201918-11-20191587": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2512_202107-04-2021148": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2065_202010-09-20202787": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2709_202107-04-2021160": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3967_202007-12-2020764": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5373_201928-09-20193528": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_328_202022-01-20201952": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2249_202102-04-2021364": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5997_201916-10-20192918": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_815_202017-08-2020328": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2472_201906-07-20192448": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5544_201930-09-20193489": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5458_201901-10-20193405": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3356_201903-07-20192616": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_170_202115-01-20213619": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7255_201919-12-2019185": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7081_201910-12-2019756": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_106_202013-01-20202335": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2668_201928-05-20193546": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3564_202003-11-20201391": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1064_202015-07-20201204": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_956_202014-07-20201232": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1213_202116-02-20212384": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3427_201901-07-20192710": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2706_201921-05-20193778": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6255_201907-11-20192003": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4878_201920-09-20193863": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_315_202010-02-20201057": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3598_201909-07-20192375": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2418_202102-04-2021377": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2297_202021-09-20202639": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3232_202027-10-20201551": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1984_202110-03-20211260": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4548_201904-09-20194796": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4100_202010-12-2020669": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6657_201921-11-20191488": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4387_201908-08-2019873": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_87_202028-01-20201724": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4254_202013-01-20213715": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1417_202028-07-2020831": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3884_201927-07-20191377": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_109_202014-02-2020883": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1862_202010-08-2020470": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_508_202130-01-20213053": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_116_202120-01-20213416": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3871_201927-07-20191375": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3173_201920-06-20192966": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4740_201904-09-20194804": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6557_201918-11-20191613": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6189_201905-11-20192085": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3824_201916-07-20191905": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_973_202126-02-20211796": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_144_202012-02-2020979": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4000_201919-08-2019448": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_840_202108-02-20212735": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_178_202024-01-20201849": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5901_201925-10-20192397": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3711_202012-11-20201086": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5011_201919-09-20193927": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5827_201915-10-20192972": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1093_202123-02-20212015": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1759_202101-03-20211743": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4448_201916-08-2019565": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1748_202108-03-20211362": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7263_201911-12-2019701": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4395_201920-08-2019398": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_520_202021-07-20201036": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_737_202005-02-20201391": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2516_202023-09-20202542": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5337_201904-10-20193270": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_515_202103-02-20212890": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1158_202123-02-20212020": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5708_201910-10-20193182": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5862_201930-10-20192296": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5275_201923-09-20193781": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1555_202005-08-2020585": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_95_202004-02-20201454": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_819_202117-02-20212272": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3375_201901-07-20192694": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3939_201929-07-20191320": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1225_202028-07-2020816": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1468_202029-07-2020783": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7323_201923-12-201958": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1857_202012-08-2020441": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_48_202013-01-20202324": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5159_201919-09-20193940": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4585_201928-08-201973": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6470_201913-11-20191846": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2005_202009-09-20202813": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3866_201913-08-2019658": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3760_201908-07-20192422": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6630_201921-11-20191477": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_220_202021-01-20201994": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_397_202029-02-2020389": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2599_202103-04-2021324": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3028_202020-10-20201704": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_227_202019-02-2020674": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_229_202020-02-2020634": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1935_202014-08-2020387": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2117_202009-09-20202814": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_50_202007-02-20201308": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1285_202117-02-20212305": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_104_202013-02-2020925": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1459_202018-08-2020301": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_162_202127-01-20213177": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3829_201912-07-20192282": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_499_202005-03-2020243": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4845_201911-09-20194566": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2844_201927-06-20192788": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3941_201919-08-2019446": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1493_202109-03-20211302": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_502_202027-01-20201805": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_120_202111-01-20213825": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3886_201913-08-2019659": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3299_202022-10-20201632": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5759_201903-10-20193363": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2929_202001-10-20202335": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_142_202108-01-20213899": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2053_202024-08-2020120": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_341_202120-01-20213430": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2195_202117-03-2021998": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6795_201903-12-20191011": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1241_202016-07-20201177": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6689_201918-11-20191618": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6951_201905-12-2019908": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2048_202021-08-2020193": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2537_202025-09-20202433": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6220_201913-11-20191826": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1957_202122-03-2021754": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6861_201905-12-2019896": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1016_202009-07-20201328": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3338_202021-10-20201682": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1090_202101-03-20211707": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6027_201901-11-20192195": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4810_201926-08-2019206": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_705_202109-02-20212665": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2875_202008-10-20202054": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_424_202028-02-2020426": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2349_201901-06-20193375": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1156_202015-07-20201209": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4543_201913-08-2019697": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_221_202004-03-2020277": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1796_202125-03-2021573": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4589_201905-09-20194741": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1983_202007-09-20202882": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1130_202112-02-20212481": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1512_202030-07-2020728": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4517_202007-01-20213943": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5593_201914-10-20193021": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2430_202109-04-202152": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4726_201927-08-2019149": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_257_202014-02-2020893": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_211_202013-02-2020932": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_150_202014-01-20202278": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2595_202009-09-20202828": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3576_201915-07-20191966": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2321_202103-04-2021310": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2180_202122-03-2021770": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7272_201921-12-2019103": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2311_202102-04-2021370": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1539_202106-03-20211400": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3567_201906-07-20192474": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3230_201901-07-20192683": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2438_202014-09-20202721": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4041_201909-08-2019762": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3695_201926-07-20191424": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2859_201917-06-20193033": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_983_202010-07-20201298": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2862_202006-10-20202148": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1241_202016-07-20201176": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1052_202010-07-20201305": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3554_202010-11-20201171": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_478_202020-01-20202096": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2087_202119-03-2021871": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4024_202005-12-2020791": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1048_202016-07-20201169": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2633_202105-04-2021257": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_894_202009-07-20201321": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1065_202013-07-20201269": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2399_202008-09-20202848": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3930_202009-12-2020692": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2606_201903-06-20193346": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4378_202022-12-2020107": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_654_202110-02-20212588": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1606_202106-03-20211401": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_409_202129-01-20213085": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1649_202118-03-2021903": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1167_202027-07-2020866": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2888_201910-06-20193191": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5000_201911-09-20194574": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_391_202121-01-20213370": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1924_202014-08-2020384": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_486_202128-01-20213153": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1787_202102-04-2021350": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_282_202013-01-20202367": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2514_202116-04-202117": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2372_202031-08-20203081": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7318_201924-12-201921": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3417_201915-07-20191955": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5251_201927-09-20193579": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_902_202102-03-20211621": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1050_202014-07-20201238": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1361_202126-02-20211820": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5936_201914-10-20193047": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2872_202130-04-20212": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4138_201931-07-20191198": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2810_202025-09-20202454": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2708_202107-04-2021159": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2930_202006-10-20202161": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4061_202014-12-2020377": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_674_202004-02-20201431": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3256_202031-10-20201418": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_91_202109-03-20211293": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_533_202130-01-20213056": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2573_202119-04-20219": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_250_202019-02-2020681": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3800_202023-12-202030": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_528_202105-02-20212828": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3928_202009-12-2020691": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_270_202019-02-2020684": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2906_202005-10-20202220": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_488_202020-01-20202099": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2906_201924-06-20192894": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1036_202110-02-20212613": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6075_201906-11-20192038": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4792_201928-08-201996": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2722_201906-06-20193261": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_343_202025-02-2020537": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2161_202119-03-2021877": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1859_202104-03-20211554": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1743_202112-03-20211168": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1533_202004-08-2020627": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3204_202015-10-20201879": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_276_202013-01-20202360": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4166_201914-08-2019604": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_736_202010-02-20201068": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2917_202003-10-20202280": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_833_202016-07-20201147": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4286_201908-08-2019862": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4755_201913-09-20194414": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_890_202014-07-20201231": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4032_202014-12-2020370": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5483_201924-09-20193723": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1800_202117-03-2021967": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6444_201921-11-20191462": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_764_202101-02-20213005": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3885_201927-07-20191378": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4062_202014-12-2020378": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2187_202117-03-2021993": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2562_201901-06-20193378": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2469_202008-09-20202854": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6124_201930-10-20192308": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2635_202105-04-2021259": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_728_202029-01-20201689": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5590_201916-10-20192895": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_14_202011-02-20201019": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_63_202108-01-20213894": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1162_202016-07-20201172": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1878_202026-08-202021": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6182_201924-10-20192493": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1296_202022-07-20201017": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2747_202108-04-2021117": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4131_202019-12-2020173": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_280_202024-02-2020585": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4003_201931-07-20191179": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6120_201922-10-20192617": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6639_201927-11-20191212": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2506_202131-03-2021476": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1668_202125-02-20211923": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_915_202117-02-20212281": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2488_202103-04-2021319": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_192_202112-01-20213768": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2692_202022-09-20202595": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_704_202028-01-20201751": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_457_202127-01-20213209": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2478_201918-05-20193865": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2606_202126-04-202121": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5276_201923-09-20193782": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_39_202010-02-20201087": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4103_201929-07-20191327": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_569_202029-02-2020403": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5193_201923-09-20193769": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2867_202126-04-202125": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_617_202103-02-20212897": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_235_202013-01-20202350": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4493_202015-01-20213639": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1124_202112-02-20212475": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_299_202020-01-20202074": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3538_202028-10-20201537": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7181_201917-12-2019254": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4155_202015-12-2020319": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5074_201917-09-20194050": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4900_201903-09-20194865": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6207_201907-11-20191998": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4220_201913-08-2019674": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_128_202010-02-20201095": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2918_201906-06-20193277": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_937_202004-07-20201402": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_361_202021-01-20202009": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4018_202015-12-2020303": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6255_201907-11-20192004": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3724_202012-11-20201091": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_810_202117-02-20212270": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7394_201903-01-20202626": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4241_202021-12-2020152": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4010_202002-12-2020832": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7420_201918-12-2019225": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3491_201902-08-20191052": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3859_202021-11-2020968": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_838_202110-02-20212603": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2905_202001-10-20202332": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_164_202130-01-20213038": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4414_201906-08-2019984": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4908_201912-09-20194504": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3899_201931-07-20191170": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3830_201903-08-20191008": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3581_201922-07-20191603": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2396_202030-09-20202354": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5278_201930-09-20193465": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1722_202126-02-20211840": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4791_201906-09-20194695": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1299_202117-02-20212311": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2764_201915-06-20193065": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5914_201921-10-20192644": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3744_201919-07-20191717": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4653_201928-08-201984": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1326_202101-03-20211722": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7211_201910-12-2019761": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6904_201903-12-20191017": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2368_201910-06-20193183": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_618_202027-01-20201814": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4626_201907-09-20194627": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1466_202106-03-20211393": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1447_202126-02-20211831": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2964_201904-07-20192568": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_297_202018-01-20202153": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2533_202008-09-20202862": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2203_202026-08-202041": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2388_202027-08-20203150": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1980_202122-03-2021757": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_341_202012-03-2020101": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3075_201907-06-20193244": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_288_202024-01-20201854": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2651_201918-05-20193875": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_316_202119-01-20213502": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1657_202110-03-20211228": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1462_202024-07-2020937": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5044_201917-09-20194047": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_799_202010-07-20201292": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2763_202023-09-20202563": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3650_202021-11-2020966": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4117_201907-08-2019902": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_235_202013-01-20202353": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2199_202007-09-20202886": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2019_202007-10-20202090": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_709_202003-03-2020317": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_149_202014-01-20202277": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2722_202001-10-20202318": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_525_202126-02-20211791": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1003_202021-07-20201048": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3480_201904-07-20192580": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3430_201920-07-20191657": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2286_202102-04-2021367": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5634_201924-10-20192468": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_939_202125-02-20211877": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6257_201912-11-20191878": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6219_201904-12-2019941": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4482_201904-09-20194790": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_713_202001-02-20201518": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_540_202027-01-20201809": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4282_202024-12-20207": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_271_202019-02-2020685": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5611_201922-10-20192591": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3524_201916-07-20191869": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1717_202126-02-20211836": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4372_201920-08-2019397": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5369_201910-10-20193151": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1934_202019-08-2020281": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_169_202013-01-20202341": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3061_202017-10-20201782": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2346_202126-03-2021537": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2919_202003-10-20202281": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2883_202007-10-20201856": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_898_202029-06-20201589": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3186_201920-09-20192682": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3688_202031-10-20201156": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4629_202015-01-20213495": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3608_201916-09-20192893": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3280_201914-08-2019388": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1825_202014-07-20201277": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_306_202028-02-2020413": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2070_202120-04-2021100": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_398_202029-01-20201538": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2176_202120-04-2021103": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3639_202002-11-20201103": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3254_201919-08-2019317": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2953_202027-10-20201259": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3953_202018-11-2020711": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1158_202008-06-20201970": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5015_201916-12-2019228": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_112_202018-02-2020728": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1301_202110-03-20211262": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4149_201930-09-20192393": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_828_202102-03-20211561": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3408_201927-09-20192441": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3226_202014-10-20201643": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4041_201930-09-20192388": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1843_202021-07-20201097": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_173_202023-01-20201721": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3977_201920-09-20192705": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3293_202021-10-20201369": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4347_202003-12-2020488": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1530_202117-03-20211056": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4099_201921-09-20192663": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_24_202113-01-20213528": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2456_202003-09-20202695": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1735_202007-07-20201378": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2125_202012-08-2020597": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_304_202116-02-20213936": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_918_202029-05-20202138": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_846_202105-02-20212605": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4281_201925-10-20191791": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3045_202012-10-20201713": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2547_202018-09-20202355": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2848_202018-09-20202400": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3139_202020-10-20201401": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5343_201919-12-2019110": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4747_201921-11-20191291": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1289_202016-06-20201761": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3453_201914-08-2019407": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4359_202002-12-2020525": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_436_202011-02-2020936": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5099_201905-12-2019747": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5366_201904-01-20202245": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_994_202118-02-20212065": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2379_202014-08-2020411": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3576_202028-10-20201232": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3688_201904-09-20193312": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_270_202019-02-2020671": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3294_201924-08-2019160": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_232_202105-02-20213976": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3880_201912-09-20193151": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4581_201905-11-20191672": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_616_202129-01-20212954": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4376_201905-12-2019734": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1614_202006-07-20201397": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2702_202007-10-20201852": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2495_202031-08-20202778": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2670_202018-09-20202375": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3187_202025-01-20213114": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1732_202027-07-2020875": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2817_201931-07-2019777": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4648_202004-01-20213830": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1887_202024-07-2020950": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4758_202015-01-20213500": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3623_201927-08-2019121": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3515_201902-09-20193354": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3078_201901-08-2019737": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1157_202011-06-20201871": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1216_202102-03-20211581": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4326_202018-02-20212072": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3419_202019-10-20201467": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3615_201905-09-20193247": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_353_202129-01-20212928": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_138_202127-01-20213032": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4743_201912-11-20191566": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4529_202015-01-20213492": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103_202008-01-20202140": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3284_201921-08-2019238": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1330_202110-03-20211268": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_118_202018-02-2020729": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_442_202012-03-2020135": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4673_201915-11-20191430": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_307_202023-01-20201738": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5373_201924-12-20198": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3959_202018-11-2020713": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4305_202011-12-2020265": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2256_202018-08-2020333": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2033_202116-04-2021142": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4611_202001-01-20213861": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1819_202124-03-2021784": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2941_201923-07-20191061": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_117_202022-01-20201767": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1880_202108-04-2021307": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_914_202123-02-20211846": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1159_202115-03-20211149": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_268_202028-01-20201583": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4273_202018-12-2020138": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4835_201905-12-2019737": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2931_202024-09-20202192": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1919_202027-07-2020881": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4137_201924-09-20192587": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3297_202012-10-20201726": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4272_201919-10-20191907": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4152_202018-11-2020725": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4792_202012-01-20213594": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_476_202004-03-2020304": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3834_202009-11-2020898": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2027_202106-04-2021417": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2228_202014-08-2020396": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3445_201930-08-20193383": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1440_202125-03-2021711": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3321_202014-10-20201649": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3346_201921-08-2019243": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_423_202001-02-20201456": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4567_202012-01-20213585": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3359_201919-08-2019323": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3148_201914-08-2019378": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1126_202124-02-20211777": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4509_201917-10-20191991": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5103_201902-01-20202312": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2961_202030-09-20202050": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3150_202005-10-20201930": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5140_201905-12-2019749": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1618_202107-04-2021350": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5196_201904-12-2019815": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2037_202029-07-2020814": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1964_202120-04-202193": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3547_201927-08-2019116": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2953_201919-07-20191178": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4969_201922-11-20191231": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1795_202108-04-2021298": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5261_201906-12-2019715": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_10_202006-01-20202214": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1000_202030-05-20202114": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_73_202019-02-2020639": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2378_202018-08-2020336": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2636_202018-09-20202363": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_127_202011-02-2020956": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3804_201916-09-20192907": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3885_201918-09-20192789": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4889_201901-01-20202349": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_324_202024-02-2020599": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3150_201908-08-2019532": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_279_202022-01-20201787": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_151_202018-02-2020732": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3409_202012-10-20201736": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3475_201912-09-20193124": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_396_202020-02-2020607": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_371_202005-03-2020242": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4322_201924-10-20191825": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_437_202028-02-2020437": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_738_202027-05-20202160": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5270_201907-01-20202183": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1570_202003-07-20201470": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1572_202004-07-20201424": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4464_202008-02-20212476": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1221_202109-03-20211328": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_909_202028-05-20202148": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3856_202011-11-2020805": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4034_201920-09-20192709": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_661_202105-02-20212590": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_487_202110-02-20212325": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1598_202112-03-20211231": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4679_201912-11-20191562": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_222_202017-02-2020786": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_292_202013-02-2020822": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1022_202112-03-20211207": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1844_202125-03-2021730": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1925_202115-04-2021170": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1956_202108-04-2021318": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3070_201908-08-2019523": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5464_201923-12-201944": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2701_202025-09-20202149": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1690_202123-03-2021834": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_399_202029-01-20201539": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4414_201924-10-20191832": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3836_202012-11-2020771": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_454_202110-03-20213908": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2461_202028-08-20202803": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4171_201915-10-20192059": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3040_202021-10-20201363": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4445_201925-10-20191804": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1260_202122-03-2021868": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2246_202013-08-2020564": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_812_202027-05-20202165": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2851_202014-09-20202491": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4780_201928-11-20191025": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3656_202021-10-20201383": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4146_202026-11-2020585": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_336_202125-02-20211680": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3097_201908-08-2019527": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4100_202021-12-202072": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3573_201928-08-201970": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3123_201908-08-2019530": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1744_202108-04-2021294": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3249_201913-08-2019442": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3644_202024-11-2020605": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3281_202012-10-20201724": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4141_202010-12-2020296": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_73_202023-01-20201708": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_599_202115-02-20212169": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_684_202027-05-20202155": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3115_202027-10-20201261": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2614_202022-09-20202233": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1806_202017-07-20201200": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3566_202029-10-20201180": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1828_202106-04-2021406": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1926_202027-07-2020883": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1116_202115-03-20211148": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3564_201930-08-20193403": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_182_202013-02-2020856": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_444_202003-03-2020348": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1448_202123-03-2021823": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1400_202125-03-2021710": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_664_202129-01-20212957": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_270_202119-01-20213352": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_64_202014-01-20202008": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_554_202028-02-2020446": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1763_202024-07-2020938": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_360_202018-02-2020766": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4726_202005-01-20213819": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_279_202111-02-20213951": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_926_202030-05-20202112": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4402_202021-12-202078": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_734_202027-05-20202158": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4432_202004-12-2020447": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3444_201920-08-2019298": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1060_202009-06-20201957": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4874_201929-11-2019972": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_355_202102-02-20212774": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1799_202123-03-2021844": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4461_201915-10-20192083": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2825_202021-09-20202310": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4616_201914-11-20191473": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3906_201916-09-20192917": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4808_201926-11-20191124": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3656_201928-08-201976": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1240_202123-02-20211868": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1797_202101-04-2021618": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4278_201914-10-20192115": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2233_202013-08-2020562": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1215_202012-06-20201812": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4876_201929-11-2019973": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4628_201906-12-2019676": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4271_202010-12-2020304": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4025_202010-11-2020864": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2098_202122-04-202163": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3712_201905-09-20193257": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_997_202009-06-20201943": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4427_202024-12-202019": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3648_201917-09-20192829": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2954_202015-10-20201580": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3638_201930-09-20192382": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_645_202103-02-20212724": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1072_202105-03-20211490": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_345_202005-02-20201354": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_286_202110-02-20212321": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1846_202030-07-2020756": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3397_202015-10-20201611": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1504_202119-03-2021948": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3905_202006-11-2020961": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_467_202116-03-20213903": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2954_201922-08-2019183": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_663_202005-03-2020270": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_846_202005-06-20202005": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4290_201915-10-20192066": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4160_201917-10-20191971": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2370_202020-08-2020180": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1041_202011-06-20201853": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_957_202004-06-20202041": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2880_202025-09-20202157": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2217_202021-08-2020134": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4136_201904-10-20192262": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2958_202014-10-20201635": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1504_202020-07-20201148": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2602_202021-09-20202305": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_341_202029-01-20201534": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3689_201930-08-20193414": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2053_202024-07-2020962": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_473_202027-02-2020495": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2858_202018-09-20202401": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1703_202022-07-20201026": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4188_201904-10-20192264": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4050_202023-11-2020645": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2042_202018-12-20202862": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3786_202011-11-2020801": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3157_202013-10-20201681": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3428_202007-01-20213706": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4492_201911-11-20191594": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4360_201915-10-20192075": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_534_202005-06-20201994": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3162_201906-08-2019600": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_448_202122-01-20213142": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1560_202002-07-20201521": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5232_201905-12-2019758": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4945_201921-11-20191305": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2863_202029-09-20202088": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5084_201928-11-20191043": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_928_202118-02-20212058": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2925_201914-08-2019367": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102_202010-01-20202061": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3102_201905-08-2019644": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3964_201924-09-20192580": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3554_201920-09-20192687": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2071_202007-08-2020623": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4160_202024-12-202011": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3009_202012-10-20201710": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1319_202125-02-20211715": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1368_202003-07-20201459": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5451_201903-01-20202277": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_994_202010-08-2020601": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1497_202006-07-20201387": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4383_202016-12-2020179": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5304_201908-01-20202144": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_715_202029-05-20202125": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2605_202022-09-20202232": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2956_202030-09-20202046": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1111_202011-06-20201862": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2467_202027-08-20202834": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4090_201914-10-20192107": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1594_202118-03-20211007": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1547_202004-07-20201421": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_346_202010-02-2020967": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1303_202026-06-20201625": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4414_202010-12-2020325": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5024_201902-12-2019890": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3725_201907-09-20193199": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1747_202021-07-20201087": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1229_202106-04-2021399": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3114_201906-08-2019595": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3142_201906-08-2019597": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4176_202005-12-2020394": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1972_202024-07-2020960": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3224_202020-10-20201403": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1741_202023-07-2020994": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4255_201914-11-20191471": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4056_201903-10-20192309": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_597_202111-02-20212269": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3839_202002-12-2020499": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_76_202107-01-20213699": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_451_202109-03-20213912": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1717_202007-07-20201375": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3618_202029-10-20201190": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_350_202018-02-2020756": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_287_202028-02-2020408": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4254_201930-09-20192397": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_176_202024-01-20201669": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1451_202119-03-2021945": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1881_202024-07-2020948": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3949_201925-09-20192536": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2667_202022-09-20202236": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_527_202004-03-2020312": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3773_202005-11-2020992": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_652_202105-02-20212588": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3165_201907-08-2019575": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3178_202001-10-20202000": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_823_202028-05-20202145": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1873_202105-04-2021456": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2734_201924-07-2019987": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1358_202102-03-20211598": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2030_202008-10-20201794": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5437_201920-12-201971": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3987_202010-11-2020862": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4686_201915-11-20191433": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4133_201909-10-20192213": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3235_201930-07-2019848": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5228_201905-12-2019754": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_103_202105-02-20212560": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5059_201904-12-2019808": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2084_202007-08-2020624": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1963_202103-04-2021483": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5423_201919-12-2019117": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2711_201922-07-20191090": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1884_202031-07-2020725": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3586_201916-09-20192891": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_739_202029-05-20202127": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3345_201909-08-2019483": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3681_201905-09-20193255": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3245_201931-07-2019796": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4048_202024-11-2020618": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3309_202006-01-20213753": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3540_202019-10-20201477": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5235_201912-12-2019492": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3949_202011-11-2020807": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4558_201906-01-20202217": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_288_202019-02-2020675": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4608_202021-12-202091": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2889_202022-09-20202255": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3653_202021-10-20201381": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_200_202024-02-2020592": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_404_202006-03-2020191": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3015_201930-07-2019836": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1800_202014-07-20201273": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3920_201924-09-20192576": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3356_201927-08-201998": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4541_201907-11-20191629": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5495_201907-01-20202191": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1278_202108-03-20211406": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2038_202116-04-2021143": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2832_202024-09-20202189": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2326_202018-08-2020334": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1612_202006-07-20201395": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2939_201931-07-2019782": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3105_202005-10-20201928": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2394_202011-09-20202502": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1600_202131-03-2021641": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5287_201917-12-2019203": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3299_201902-08-2019717": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3048_202012-10-20201714": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3466_202015-10-20201616": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1878_202022-07-20201035": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4540_201907-11-20191628": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4067_202023-11-2020650": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_965_202117-02-20212112": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1576_202030-06-20201584": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_320_202118-02-20213930": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2027_202004-08-2020692": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_141_202023-01-20201717": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2414_202011-09-20202506": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1625_202006-07-20201398": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1397_202030-07-2020751": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1455_202024-06-20201662": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4715_202001-01-20213864": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3576_201930-08-20193404": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4502_202016-12-2020182": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2854_201908-08-2019512": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5231_201905-12-2019757": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1864_202028-07-2020847": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3607_202017-02-20212125": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1997_202027-07-2020899": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3891_201913-09-20193097": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4122_202002-12-2020512": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_693_202004-06-20202028": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4276_201910-10-20192202": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3086_201929-07-2019865": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_992_202118-02-20212064": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4866_201929-11-2019970": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1963_202024-07-2020958": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4710_201905-11-20191675": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1161_202010-06-20201919": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_293_202013-02-2020823": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_327_202017-02-2020787": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3585_202031-10-20201149": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_214_202017-01-20201914": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4266_202005-01-20213793": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4426_202025-01-20213117": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3622_202005-11-2020981": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3580_201917-09-20192825": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_296_202028-01-20201586": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1195_202108-03-20211399": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1414_202105-03-20211506": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2049_202006-08-2020658": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1561_202126-03-2021680": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_830_202105-02-20212603": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_440_202004-12-2020411": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3382_202012-10-20201733": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2747_201918-07-20191210": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_713_202118-02-20212045": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3418_202015-10-20201614": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2121_202031-07-2020741": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1454_202024-06-20201661": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4592_202024-12-202026": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1949_202122-04-202156": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1796_202123-03-2021842": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1429_202119-03-2021943": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1015_202122-03-2021867": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1587_202101-04-2021606": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1768_202024-07-2020939": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_229_202019-02-2020663": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4755_201929-11-2019965": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3755_201912-09-20193137": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2151_202116-04-2021157": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_720_202101-02-20212868": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1124_202011-06-20201864": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1978_202109-04-2021263": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_91_202021-01-20201822": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2057_202031-07-2020739": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2430_202020-08-2020184": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1954_202024-07-2020956": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4398_201914-10-20192121": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4770_201915-11-20191435": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4303_201917-10-20191980": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1756_202014-07-20201272": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1167_202012-06-20201808": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4328_202011-02-20212297": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3253_202011-11-2020796": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4072_201920-09-20192712": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6_202002-06-20202055": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1644_202028-08-20202799": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_376_202019-02-2020681": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3886_202010-11-2020850": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4040_202018-11-2020720": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3363_202015-10-20201608": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_298_202029-01-20201531": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_575_202019-03-20209": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3274_202017-10-20201496": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_214_202103-02-20213984": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2046_202116-04-2021145": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_611_202104-02-20212654": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5371_201923-12-201939": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_919_202029-05-20202139": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4641_201927-11-20191071": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3350_201906-08-2019609": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4391_202008-01-20213669": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2769_201912-07-20191511": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3747_202002-11-20201115": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2961_201919-07-20191180": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2907_201917-07-20191267": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1798_202012-08-2020596": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4570_201913-11-20191524": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3429_201917-08-2019351": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_115_202003-02-20201410": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4680_201904-12-2019779": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_173_202111-01-20213620": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1388_202102-03-20211606": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4058_201924-09-20192585": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1402_202102-04-2021537": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_449_202122-01-20213143": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1453_202004-07-20201417": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_261_202018-02-2020749": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3831_202002-11-20201117": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_287_202101-02-20212841": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2543_202022-09-20202228": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5042_201909-12-2019610": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_521_202116-02-20212143": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_90_202022-01-20201763": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4470_202012-01-20213584": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1116_202030-06-20201560": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3281_201914-08-2019389": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4740_202013-01-20213547": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4329_201915-10-20192070": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3523_202023-10-20201305": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4677_201927-11-20191074": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4001_201920-09-20192708": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_373_202002-03-2020365": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2976_201930-07-2019832": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2692_202003-10-20201944": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2847_202018-09-20202399": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4203_201920-11-20191337": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_110_202106-01-20213748": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4739_201911-11-20191603": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3107_202001-10-20201997": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5095_201911-12-2019523": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3202_201906-08-2019602": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3554_202016-10-20201547": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4398_202003-12-2020490": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1637_202021-07-20201079": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_139_202120-01-20213283": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_651_202027-05-20202152": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4330_202005-02-20212609": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_596_202103-02-20212721": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5154_201902-12-2019895": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_370_202005-03-2020241": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_662_202005-03-2020269": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2983_201923-07-20191063": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1104_202109-03-20211320": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_125_202006-02-20201339": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3803_201912-09-20193143": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1502_202124-03-2021758": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3102_202028-09-20202131": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_212_202023-01-20201727": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3909_202001-12-2020535": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1867_202020-07-20201162": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3308_202012-10-20201729": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3369_201914-08-2019398": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1266_202028-07-2020827": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3733_202027-10-20201276": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3451_201914-08-2019405": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_555_202028-02-2020447": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4972_201904-12-2019799": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3101_201913-09-20193065": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1815_202021-07-20201094": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1115_202115-03-20211147": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4958_201930-11-2019933": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4341_202019-12-2020111": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1368_202105-04-2021449": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4468_202010-12-2020332": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3219_202005-10-20201938": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_555_202125-01-20213107": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1750_202017-07-20201194": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4164_201901-10-20192351": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4289_201915-10-20192065": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5454_201903-01-20202279": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3867_202010-11-2020848": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_304_202115-02-20212168": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3678_202022-10-20201347": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_550_202009-07-20201309": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3783_201913-09-20193086": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_924_202030-05-20202110": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4995_201911-12-2019522": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1391_202025-06-20201646": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2753_202011-09-20202521": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2432_202018-08-2020337": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2304_202019-08-2020316": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3399_202012-11-2020761": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_753_202002-06-20202059": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_327_202103-02-20212708": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_371_202029-01-20201537": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4535_201923-10-20191875": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_364_202018-02-2020770": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3420_201926-08-2019147": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2882_201916-07-20191310": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_21_202014-01-20202000": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1516_202109-03-20211347": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3548_202016-10-20201544": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_267_202013-02-2020866": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4136_202011-01-20213628": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3759_202011-11-2020799": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3730_202029-10-20201201": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1717_202119-03-2021959": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4318_201902-12-2019863": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2930_201922-07-20191106": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3074_201901-08-2019736": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5185_201906-12-2019709": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1707_202020-07-20201154": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4266_201918-10-20191942": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3304_201902-08-2019719": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2531_202003-09-20202701": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3929_201912-09-20193154": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2319_202120-04-2021114": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_397_202005-02-20201360": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4382_202010-12-2020319": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1196_202026-06-20201621": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5470_201924-12-201914": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1912_202021-07-20201107": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3749_202028-10-20201237": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4726_201911-11-20191601": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1473_202002-07-20201512": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4852_201928-11-20191030": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2709_202001-10-20201984": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1844_202022-07-20201033": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3547_202016-10-20201543": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2676_202018-09-20202377": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4294_201905-12-2019733": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1704_202107-04-2021354": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2784_202022-09-20202245": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1041_202115-02-20212200": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2839_202018-09-20202397": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3848_202025-01-20213115": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5038_201926-11-20191137": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2496_202011-09-20202511": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4516_201922-11-20191205": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_834_202019-03-202025": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3060_202024-09-20202196": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3932_201916-09-20192918": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3572_201929-08-201922": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3028_202007-10-20201863": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1623_202101-04-2021608": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_22_202010-02-2020984": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3531_202027-10-20201265": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1200_202015-06-20201774": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3988_202017-11-2020740": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_24_202010-01-20202055": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_43_202104-01-20211755": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_294_202029-01-2020508": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2763_202008-10-2020912": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1674_202002-07-2020363": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2760_202013-10-2020843": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_418_202103-02-20211197": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2126_202024-08-202035": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1003484_201911-09-2019894": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1732_202013-07-2020292": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2511_202014-09-20201337": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2893_202021-11-2020336": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2416_202009-09-20201374": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3069_202006-11-2020513": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1004247_201907-11-2019404": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2090_202031-08-20201522": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_725_202117-02-2021855": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_953_202126-02-2021649": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1124_202115-03-2021371": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2298_202011-09-20201348": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1091_202008-06-2020727": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1215_202006-06-2020783": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3996_202012-01-20211641": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1003878_201930-10-2019527": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2954_202022-10-2020684": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1002986_201926-08-201927": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1419_202024-06-2020495": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2040_202017-08-2020103": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3309_202006-11-2020520": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_92_202021-01-2020602": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2743_202015-10-2020789": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_782_202117-02-2021861": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_870_202125-02-2021673": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_435_202112-02-2021946": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1327_202124-03-2021203": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2978_202010-11-2020455": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3326_202007-11-2020496": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_150_202127-01-20211354": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3685_202005-12-2020214": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1874_202005-08-2020172": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1172_202006-06-2020778": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1839_202014-08-2020112": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2599_202005-10-2020984": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1004797_201903-01-2020761": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1003835_201917-10-2019619": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_580_202014-02-2020322": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_543_202105-02-20211147": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_605_202006-03-202081": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1498_202026-06-2020456": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2752_202019-10-2020759": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1004590_201916-12-201948": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2246_202004-09-20201476": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1003808_201918-10-2019606": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1004251_201911-11-2019377": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_846_202101-03-2021625": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1760_202005-08-2020162": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1545_202002-07-2020354": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1004789_201907-01-2020711": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_140_202020-01-2020618": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1623_202030-06-2020414": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_981_202103-03-2021580": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1695_202029-06-2020442": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1004759_201919-12-201926": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3725_202006-02-20211116": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_854_202123-02-2021730": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3880_202004-01-20211765": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1334_202125-03-2021167": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1002881_201920-08-201962": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_230_202002-07-2020958": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3675_202008-12-2020191": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4012_202013-01-20211609": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1516_202019-10-2020751": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1882_202027-08-20201564": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2263_202031-08-20201531": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2424_202021-09-20201198": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_145_202120-01-20211480": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1192_202110-03-2021435": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2070_202007-09-20201412": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_636_202105-02-20211150": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_345_202105-02-20211129": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_458_202101-02-20211273": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_285_202119-01-20211506": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1002998_201920-08-201963": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1965_202005-08-2020175": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_163_202125-01-20211389": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1658_202014-07-2020258": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2018_202027-08-20201568": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3735_202007-12-2020207": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_282_202122-01-20211425": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1171_202110-03-2021433": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2398_202007-09-20201440": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1272_202120-03-2021271": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3357_202024-11-2020315": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_986_202108-03-2021488": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_94_202017-01-2020639": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_82_202112-01-20211624": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4_202004-01-2020740": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2781_202008-10-2020914": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1004515_201925-11-2019220": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1206_202004-06-2020809": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1981_202027-08-20201567": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3380_202021-12-202075": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2022_202027-08-20201569": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1460_202030-06-2020402": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2712_202003-10-20201030": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4010_202024-12-202026": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2334_202008-09-20201391": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2361_202002-09-20201492": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1328_202015-06-2020604": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1643_202001-07-2020387": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3870_202002-01-20211781": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1614_202014-07-2020253": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2597_202028-09-20201095": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2911_202021-10-2020703": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2664_202029-09-20201072": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1241_202011-06-2020643": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1862_202020-08-202049": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3668_202025-11-2020300": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1004478_201905-12-2019117": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1003811_201924-10-2019552": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1246_202125-03-2021158": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1046_202110-03-2021419": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3540_202021-11-2020348": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3914_202021-12-2020107": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1139_202006-06-2020773": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1004195_201908-11-2019390": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1354_202102-04-202197": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_153_202027-01-2020526": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_550_202019-02-2020256": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3339_202019-11-2020373": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1932_202020-08-202053": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3330_202024-11-2020313": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_234_202106-02-20211094": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2288_202025-09-20201111": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2948_202021-10-2020705": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_399_202102-02-20211235": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1004432_201925-11-2019218": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_781_202122-02-2021754": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_857_202109-03-2021444": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1003129_201927-08-201918": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1017_202025-06-2020467": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2695_202019-10-2020757": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1746_202013-07-2020295": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1987_202020-08-202058": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1198_202022-06-2020529": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2579_202025-09-20201127": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3448_202018-11-2020398": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2034_202014-08-2020123": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2122_202024-08-202034": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2167_202001-09-20201503": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1583_202030-06-2020412": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1923_202020-08-202052": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_892_202106-03-2021508": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3075_202011-11-2020434": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1003956_201916-10-2019631": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1153_202003-06-2020821": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1004241_201911-11-2019376": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1289_202008-06-2020765": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1842_202005-08-2020166": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2201_202027-08-20201580": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1275_202017-06-2020575": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3111_202028-10-2020651": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1471_202103-04-202185": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1003763_201901-10-2019754": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3185_202002-11-2020588": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3862_202021-12-2020101": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_475_202101-02-20211274": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_264_202129-01-20211306": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_579_202109-02-20211044": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1421_202029-06-2020432": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1892_202030-07-2020231": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3145_202005-11-2020541": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1838_202001-09-20201494": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_805_202005-03-2020102": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1004348_201918-11-2019280": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1494_202023-06-2020517": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1706_202014-07-2020266": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3227_202031-10-2020607": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3927_202001-01-20211798": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1003797_201911-10-2019686": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1754_202013-07-2020298": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2730_202007-10-2020942": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1329_202119-03-2021293": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_753_202026-02-2020182": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2368_202011-09-20201364": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1646_202001-07-2020388": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_166_202024-01-2020554": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1871_202010-08-2020148": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_333_202104-02-20211165": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_653_202123-02-2021716": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1004119_201925-11-2019212": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3976_202005-01-20211746": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3887_202015-01-20211586": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1004381_201913-01-2020668": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3726_202009-12-2020185": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_908_202124-02-2021700": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3872_202021-12-2020103": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1804_202031-07-2020208": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_983_202106-03-2021514": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2029_202014-08-2020122": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_171_202027-01-2020528": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1002620_201909-08-2019102": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1303_202009-06-2020716": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_979_202105-04-202147": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1002141_201903-07-2019291": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1357_202009-06-2020720": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1001849_201903-05-2019476": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2374_202005-09-20201457": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_495_202105-02-20211138": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2219_202011-09-20201346": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_578_202119-02-2021789": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1608_202020-06-2020549": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3311_202009-11-2020476": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2728_202030-09-20201038": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_742_202117-02-2021856": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_311_202029-01-2020509": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_289_202129-01-20211307": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_283_202122-01-20211426": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1958_202017-08-202095": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2717_202005-10-20201002": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2810_202003-10-20201034": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2796_202007-10-2020954": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1003870_201911-10-2019687": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_549_202115-02-2021910": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3281_202005-11-2020554": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1002857_201902-08-2019138": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2727_202005-10-20201005": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3461_202021-11-2020341": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_794_202125-02-2021665": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3165_202028-10-2020658": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2733_202007-10-2020944": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2670_202021-09-20201221": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3403_202005-11-2020567": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_825_202122-02-2021761": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1851_202013-07-2020308": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2232_202025-09-20201110": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3873_202022-12-202060": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1004845_201914-01-2020660": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_510_202105-02-20211143": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_199_202023-01-2020570": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1003970_201927-01-2020536": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1004170_201907-11-2019403": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1797_202017-08-202085": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2479_202025-09-20201117": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3516_202025-11-2020291": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3989_202007-01-20211702": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2521_202022-09-20201165": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1004349_201916-11-2019294": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_998_202102-03-2021607": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2436_202018-09-20201271": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3209_202029-10-2020636": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_185_202127-01-20211357": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2463_202018-09-20201277": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_437_202101-02-20211272": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1984_202031-07-2020215": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_474_202108-02-20211074": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_880_202105-04-202145": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3349_202003-11-2020579": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3822_202021-12-202096": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1454_202026-06-2020453": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3585_202027-11-2020255": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1504_202019-06-2020559": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_942_202102-03-2021603": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_107_202011-02-2020364": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2811_202029-10-2020616": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3469_202011-11-2020448": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3109_202020-10-2020743": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1004097_201931-10-2019518": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1306_202103-04-202174": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_761_202116-02-2021894": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1374_202012-06-2020622": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_883_202006-03-202084": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1004766_201901-01-2020796": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1253_202123-03-2021225": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2699_202007-10-2020939": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1113_202115-03-2021369": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2876_202009-10-2020903": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3297_202031-10-2020610": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1003_202104-03-2021557": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2742_202012-10-2020882": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_882_202005-03-2020106": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1034_202109-03-2021452": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_218_202024-01-2020556": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_641_202024-02-2020220": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_319_202125-01-20211398": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1003049_201927-08-201916": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_986_202029-05-2020894": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1125_202001-06-2020859": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2204_202018-09-20201256": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_855_202011-06-2020629": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_715_202104-03-2021547": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1806_202029-07-2020235": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1678_202014-07-2020262": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1004533_201918-12-201931": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_31_202020-01-2020610": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_821_202125-02-2021668": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1004561_201909-12-201987": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3800_202022-12-202053": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1004224_201904-11-2019457": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1145_202001-06-2020861": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1037_202108-03-2021493": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_569_202020-02-2020236": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3984_202012-01-20211640": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_532_202024-02-2020209": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_915_202119-03-2021278": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3323_202007-11-2020495": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2982_202020-10-2020735": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3009_202022-10-2020686": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1041_202109-03-2021453": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_463_202014-02-2020316": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1024_202006-06-2020771": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_881_202123-02-2021734": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1447_202029-06-2020433": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1003850_201906-11-2019419": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1002509_201919-07-2019206": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2381_202014-09-20201322": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1209_202009-06-2020697": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_452_202101-03-2021619": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1056_202106-03-2021521": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_120_202021-01-2020604": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_127_202128-01-20211322": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_454_202103-02-20211198": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1004365_201927-11-2019180": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3377_202011-11-2020445": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_552_202024-02-2020211": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1233_202009-06-2020703": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1258_202009-06-2020710": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1304_202120-03-2021273": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_61_202112-02-2021944": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2486_202029-09-20201056": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_147_202013-02-2020333": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2245_202004-09-20201475": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_838_202122-02-2021762": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2709_202029-09-20201083": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1326_202029-06-2020427": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2951_202027-10-2020670": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2528_202007-10-2020932": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1148_202117-03-2021320": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1210_202122-03-2021249": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1298_202101-04-2021119": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1071_202013-08-2020126": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2308_202011-09-20201353": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1860_202031-07-2020210": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2043_202028-08-20201547": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_824_202118-02-2021830": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1065_202008-06-2020725": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3304_202010-11-2020463": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2851_202012-10-2020891": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1641_202030-06-2020415": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2148_202024-08-202038": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3989_202007-01-20211703": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1200_202009-06-2020695": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3167_202020-10-2020746": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_802_202007-03-202067": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1698_202014-07-2020264": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1675_202029-07-2020234": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2045_202020-08-202061": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2525_202028-09-20201093": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3521_202025-11-2020294": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1458_202016-06-2020594": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_875_202007-03-202077": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2350_202005-09-20201455": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1282_202123-03-2021226": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2826_202008-10-2020918": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3633_202003-12-2020231": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1003693_201926-09-2019796": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_97_202016-01-2020651": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1346_202024-06-2020489": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1086_202110-03-2021426": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3264_202005-11-2020553": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_852_202122-02-2021763": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1167_202023-06-2020508": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1002878_201920-08-201961": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_760_202118-02-2021824": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1183_202003-06-2020824": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_745_202110-02-20211023": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_115_202021-01-2020603": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_718_202117-02-2021852": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1710_202002-07-2020367": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_82_202010-02-2020385": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_619_202111-02-2021983": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1325_202119-03-2021292": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_534_202018-02-2020274": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1305_202101-04-2021120": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1027_202110-03-2021416": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1435_202101-04-2021123": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2606_202005-10-2020991": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_386_202102-02-20211234": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3005_202015-10-2020802": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_972_202019-03-202032": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_367_202128-01-20211337": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1004841_201927-01-2020537": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1004662_201923-12-201913": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_274_202022-01-2020588": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1670_202003-07-2020344": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2331_202003-09-20201487": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1003883_201919-11-2019264": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2057_202020-08-202063": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2157_202027-08-20201578": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_973_202019-03-202033": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3978_202012-01-20211639": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1319_202102-04-202196": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1068_202103-03-2021584": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2600_202005-10-2020985": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3935_202002-01-20211790": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_32_202125-01-20211385": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2322_202007-09-20201436": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2429_202014-09-20201327": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3381_202011-11-2020447": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_183_202018-02-2020270": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_612_202005-03-202094": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1433_202106-04-202134": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4015_202003-02-20211210": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1225_202011-06-2020638": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_858_202103-03-2021573": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2349_202003-09-20201488": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_14_202105-01-20211731": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3523_202027-11-2020251": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_602_202116-02-2021882": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_651_202020-02-2020242": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1004431_201928-11-2019170": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1002774_201901-08-2019144": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3003_202015-10-2020800": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_111_202020-01-2020615": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1004480_201920-11-2019256": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1004808_201903-01-2020764": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_393_202005-02-2020438": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_225_202122-01-20211420": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2080_202024-08-202030": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_988_202124-02-2021703": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1640_202004-07-2020325": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1459_202015-06-2020611": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2581_202025-09-20201129": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1004126_201905-11-2019434": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1776_202013-07-2020301": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3123_202019-10-2020776": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3677_202011-12-2020158": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2840_202007-10-2020959": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1980_202025-08-20202": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1004086_201902-11-2019469": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2159_202011-09-20201344": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_694_202020-02-2020243": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2482_202021-09-20201204": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2680_202005-10-2020998": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_456_202105-02-20211135": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1004129_201902-11-2019472": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2438_202022-09-20201159": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1004188_201902-11-2019474": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3137_202028-10-2020655": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3678_202007-12-2020201": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2353_202011-09-20201359": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_390_202005-02-2020437": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_60_202112-02-2021943": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3930_202002-01-20211789": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1214_202004-06-2020811": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_733_202003-03-2020116": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3913_202002-01-20211785": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3982_201901-07-20191629": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3297_202014-08-2020329": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7754_201913-11-20191264": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4100_202024-09-20202848": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6244_202002-12-2020786": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6045_201921-09-20192586": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8974_201901-02-20201213": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3624_202026-08-202024": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4392_202003-10-20202607": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6395_201919-09-20192705": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8310_201906-12-2019515": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6477_202010-12-2020502": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1084_202005-03-2020224": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3423_202014-08-2020341": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6698_201910-10-20192138": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5064_202015-10-20202243": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6369_202025-11-2020922": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8413_201907-12-2019493": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_8510_201912-12-2019387": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3259_201917-05-20192576": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6277_201918-09-20192749": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4413_201917-07-20191040": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4151_201905-07-20191450": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6296_202025-11-2020918": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6922_201917-10-20191982": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8880_201915-01-20201923": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6849_201928-09-20192326": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4038_201902-07-20191559": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_151_202005-02-20201112": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4101_201904-07-20191476": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4171_201903-07-20191522": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5990_201905-09-20193231": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3658_202023-09-20202884": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4200_202024-09-20202849": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8563_201913-12-2019343": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5806_201930-08-20193464": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6695_201925-09-20192431": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3787_201912-06-20191988": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5202_201919-08-2019189": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7252_201925-10-20191690": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_8840_201907-01-20202161": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6292_201905-09-20193249": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4722_202029-10-20201796": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7834_201919-11-20191047": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_122_202007-01-20202128": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3825_202021-09-20202960": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_437_202024-09-20204005": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8834_201922-01-20201614": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1130_202007-03-2020117": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4811_201930-07-2019627": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6308_201926-09-20192368": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_271_202006-02-20201072": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4858_201925-07-2019769": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7086_201902-11-20191540": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6352_202003-12-2020744": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1100_202005-03-2020225": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2956_201904-05-20192916": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_8866_201921-12-2019110": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_280_202031-01-20201272": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_838_202025-02-2020545": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7016_201925-10-20191682": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4374_201902-09-20193339": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_225_202018-02-2020666": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6000_201925-09-20192407": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6562_201920-09-20192670": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1224_202006-03-2020179": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5157_202020-10-20202062": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3736_202026-08-202035": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1639_202012-10-20202345": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_121_202007-01-20202127": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3648_201927-06-20191703": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4378_201915-07-20191124": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5329_202004-11-20201532": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_856_202028-02-2020434": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_606_202013-02-2020852": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_457_202022-01-20201602": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3556_201903-06-20192149": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3221_201920-05-20192511": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2313_202008-10-20203874": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5212_202021-10-20202036": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3698_201925-06-20191747": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3067_201910-05-20192759": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8468_201920-12-2019128": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4058_201922-06-20191795": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_147_202011-02-2020908": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1194_202006-03-2020177": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2877_201902-05-20192983": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3348_202018-08-2020271": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7206_201925-10-20191689": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5601_201929-08-201924": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1165_202005-03-2020236": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2207_202025-08-202052": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4264_201903-07-20191525": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3883_201929-06-20191665": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7025_201914-11-20191208": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3459_201929-05-20192280": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5120_202023-10-20201933": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4181_202010-09-20203197": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7780_201913-11-20191266": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5688_202010-11-20201308": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7261_201902-11-20191542": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8999_201906-01-20202221": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5446_201909-09-20193095": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4260_201908-07-20191391": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3656_201922-06-20191788": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_812_202024-02-2020588": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4485_201916-07-20191090": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3828_202007-09-20203225": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6618_201924-09-20192468": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7376_201924-10-20191755": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5451_202031-10-20201769": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6168_202003-12-2020735": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7248_201922-10-20191843": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5709_202005-11-20201507": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_871_202006-03-2020161": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4079_201925-06-20191758": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6943_201907-11-20191354": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4677_201915-07-20191142": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5723_201930-08-20193454": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5256_202022-10-20202011": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_411_202004-02-20201163": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3651_202020-08-2020205": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6492_201928-09-20192312": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_8365_201929-11-2019740": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7707_201921-11-2019965": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_859_202024-02-2020591": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1252_202019-03-20205": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3461_201928-05-20192319": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1304_202006-03-2020189": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6588_201914-10-20192095": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7659_201929-11-2019725": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1240_202006-03-2020180": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5166_201901-08-2019565": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4120_201926-06-20191730": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2178_202027-08-20203321": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5563_201931-08-20193387": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7518_201918-11-20191073": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_285_202014-02-2020779": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2160_202029-09-20203972": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3701_201904-06-20192127": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6387_201918-09-20192755": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7648_201931-10-20191633": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3779_201926-06-20191724": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4383_201901-08-2019546": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4708_201918-07-20191009": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3024_201903-05-20192952": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6821_202024-12-202032": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5663_202026-11-2020875": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4213_201921-06-20191823": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3633_202026-08-202025": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3033_201908-05-20192851": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3834_202031-10-20201744": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6219_202005-12-2020641": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1417_202006-03-2020200": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3465_201922-05-20192487": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_271_202014-01-20201972": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3498_202017-09-20203040": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_231_202015-02-2020738": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4864_201927-07-2019696": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4065_202021-09-20202967": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7159_201919-10-20191894": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4653_202003-10-20202630": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3515_202021-08-2020155": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5086_201903-08-2019494": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6030_201925-09-20192408": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2891_201908-05-20192836": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5638_202005-11-20201502": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_21_202004-02-20201143": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_374_202015-01-20201918": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8845_201907-01-20202166": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6585_201921-09-20192635": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7404_201922-10-20191856": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5020_202016-10-20202186": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4157_201901-07-20191638": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3278_202014-08-2020323": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5531_202024-11-2020939": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3676_201911-06-20192002": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5311_201901-08-2019571": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5_202016-01-20201860": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_454_202029-09-20203953": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5242_202003-11-20201581": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5186_202028-10-20201875": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2438_201904-06-20193616": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3827_202007-09-20203224": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6642_202016-12-2020342": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_634_202018-02-2020673": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2831_202002-11-20203728": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1369_202013-03-202077": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4358_201917-07-20191033": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4202_201926-06-20191733": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2994_201915-05-20192645": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1543_202018-03-202034": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1042_202003-03-2020335": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4087_201922-06-20191798": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3730_202022-09-20202920": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7285_201907-11-20191371": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3589_201901-06-20192185": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6963_202023-12-202080": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3607_202024-08-2020119": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3252_201915-05-20192655": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3871_201915-06-20191947": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4732_201924-07-2019808": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4390_201909-07-20191351": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4471_202029-09-20202743": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4361_201917-07-20191036": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4543_201910-07-20191320": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3956_201919-06-20191872": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6354_201912-09-20193004": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6931_201902-11-20191537": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5613_202011-11-20201263": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4158_202003-10-20202599": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_326_202005-02-20201122": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4356_202023-09-20202909": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7439_201922-10-20191859": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5700_201920-08-2019175": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_496_202027-01-20201426": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_782_202024-02-2020580": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_71_202022-01-20201566": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_241_202013-02-2020836": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3281_202014-08-2020324": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5348_201906-08-2019437": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4352_202007-10-20202455": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3295_201917-05-20192579": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2289_201927-05-20193743": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1271_202013-03-202072": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_440_202025-09-20203994": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_8509_201918-12-2019179": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3681_201906-06-20192089": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4105_201903-07-20191513": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4344_201904-07-20191483": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7690_201918-11-20191087": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6054_201907-09-20193159": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5490_202003-11-20201606": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4283_201906-07-20191417": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1183_202004-03-2020287": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3615_202025-08-202066": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4172_201908-07-20191389": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4050_201903-07-20191507": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_48_202011-02-2020906": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3961_201918-06-20191909": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5729_201927-08-2019123": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5482_202031-10-20201770": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4748_202007-10-20202482": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5481_201913-08-2019300": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7881_201907-01-20202145": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6530_201925-09-20192416": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6410_202016-12-2020333": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6165_201919-09-20192700": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5333_201909-08-2019329": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8953_201916-01-20201865": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5295_202029-10-20201828": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4293_202017-09-20203084": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5472_201903-09-20193297": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8777_201918-01-20201739": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1162_202007-03-2020119": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4546_202006-10-20202519": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8892_201906-01-20202215": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8160_201929-11-2019733": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2911_202017-08-2020279": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4705_202019-10-20202094": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3715_201925-06-20191748": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_613_202028-01-20201387": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5410_202031-10-20201766": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4063_201901-07-20191632": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4526_202019-10-20202092": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_301_202012-02-2020886": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_111_202015-01-20201880": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3023_201903-05-20192951": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5984_202019-11-20201111": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3619_201903-06-20192157": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_468_202015-10-20203830": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5646_202021-11-20201019": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7049_201910-10-20192148": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6497_201923-09-20192553": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5152_201902-08-2019526": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3974_201927-06-20191705": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4227_202024-09-20202850": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_802_202026-02-2020506": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7735_201905-12-2019551": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2311_202008-10-20203872": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3406_201925-05-20192389": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3795_202025-08-202085": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_839_202026-02-2020509": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6570_201923-09-20192561": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5363_202029-10-20201836": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7676_201905-11-20191508": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3573_202017-08-2020294": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_8888_201924-12-201928": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8608_201901-02-20201211": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5066_201903-08-2019487": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3600_202020-08-2020196": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_56_202006-02-20201064": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3623_201903-06-20192158": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4730_202012-10-20202360": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6293_201909-09-20193121": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1552_202019-03-202013": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_818_202029-02-2020385": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5584_201913-08-2019305": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7520_201918-11-20191074": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3551_202019-08-2020242": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_453_202014-02-2020790": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3069_201910-05-20192760": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4493_201920-07-2019924": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4386_202028-09-20202776": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5065_201927-08-2019104": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5524_202003-11-20201609": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_134_202003-02-20201183": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5281_201905-08-2019460": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3508_202020-08-2020189": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_382_202022-01-20201596": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3657_201903-06-20192160": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2471_202005-10-20203918": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4026_201903-07-20191504": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4171_202025-09-20202812": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6234_202002-12-2020783": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2159_202029-09-20203971": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3481_201903-06-20192144": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5167_202023-10-20201938": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6451_202016-12-2020336": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_352_202029-01-20201314": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_349_202021-01-20201650": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5112_202028-10-20201871": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6281_201919-09-20192703": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7471_201901-11-20191582": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4823_201917-07-20191066": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6541_201916-10-20192010": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2357_201930-05-20193702": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7093_201918-10-20191943": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_462_202029-01-20201323": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_8240_201905-12-2019558": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4843_202013-10-20202317": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_494_202005-03-2020209": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5898_201904-09-20193270": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5761_202004-12-2020682": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4258_202017-09-20203080": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7947_201922-11-2019931": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4237_202023-09-20202904": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6475_201912-09-20193006": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4634_201922-07-2019886": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3792_202017-09-20203047": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1989_201902-05-20194015": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4975_202023-10-20201926": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_653_202014-02-2020805": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4201_201909-07-20191342": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4924_202028-10-20201866": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2756_201901-05-20193016": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2856_202013-11-20203628": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6460_201901-10-20192260": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4176_202022-09-20202935": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_84_202015-02-2020737": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4767_202012-10-20202362": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3612_201906-06-20192086": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5008_202006-11-20201434": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6512_201920-09-20192662": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8502_201907-12-2019498": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7876_201923-11-2019895": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6557_201921-09-20192631": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5035_202022-10-20201989": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8718_201924-12-201920": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6248_202002-12-2020787": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_127_202024-01-20201458": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6280_201919-09-20192702": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_522_202006-02-20201077": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3893_201918-06-20191899": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4170_201903-07-20191521": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_646_202012-02-2020898": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4183_201924-06-20191776": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8540_201912-12-2019388": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7544_201931-10-20191630": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3720_202025-08-202077": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3198_201929-05-20192273": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7124_201919-10-20191892": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_8912_201920-12-2019144": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1275_202006-03-2020184": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8731_201921-12-201995": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5728_201929-08-201933": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5306_201927-08-2019110": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8737_201921-12-201998": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5957_202018-11-20201159": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1179_202003-03-2020347": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_129_202017-01-20201782": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4461_201910-07-20191316": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_427_202029-01-20201321": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5908_202022-12-202095": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5096_201930-07-2019640": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_852_202029-02-2020388": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3778_201907-06-20192055": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3918_202025-09-20202803": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6653_201920-09-20192675": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6316_202008-12-2020573": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6149_202003-12-2020734": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7750_201913-11-20191263": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6782_202021-12-2020170": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2703_202003-11-20203717": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7868_201914-11-20191223": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_225_202022-01-20201582": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_275_202023-01-20201518": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4451_202006-10-20202508": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2976_201904-05-20192917": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_227_202004-02-20201152": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6890_201917-10-20191981": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3458_201927-05-20192353": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3941_201906-07-20191414": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3594_201906-06-20192083": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7143_201923-11-2019888": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4219_202021-09-20202989": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_9023_201904-01-20202282": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6843_201922-10-20191833": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7589_201931-10-20191632": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7042_201907-11-20191357": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6857_201914-10-20192099": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6157_201903-09-20193321": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3090_201908-05-20192857": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4071_201905-07-20191447": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6207_202027-11-2020851": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3449_201904-06-20192110": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6691_201928-09-20192322": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6406_201914-11-20191203": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6646_201903-10-20192230": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_33_202015-02-2020735": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_429_202023-09-20204024": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5543_201907-09-20193148": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5350_202029-10-20201833": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5461_201929-08-201918": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5826_201906-09-20193194": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4282_202025-09-20202820": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3512_201902-08-2019512": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4661_202007-10-20202472": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3920_201918-06-20191904": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4692_201911-07-20191279": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4706_202005-10-20202593": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3952_202014-09-20203140": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5685_202005-11-20201505": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5629_202005-11-20201499": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5909_202024-12-202023": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5693_202027-11-2020832": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8186_201928-11-2019757": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5114_201902-08-2019525": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3335_202014-08-2020334": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8020_201928-11-2019750": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5511_202005-11-20201487": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4211_202025-09-20202817": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7547_201914-11-20191211": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_130_202027-01-20201420": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6282_202005-12-2020643": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5050_201903-08-2019485": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4317_201918-07-2019988": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3475_201929-05-20192281": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4797_201920-07-2019936": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2438_202014-08-2020304": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3443_202014-08-2020344": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8476_201920-12-2019129": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1177_202018-03-202021": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4923_201930-07-2019631": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8821_201923-12-201977": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5474_201904-09-20193263": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8232_201910-12-2019450": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6051_201921-09-20192588": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5216_201909-08-2019321": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4485_202028-09-20202786": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6271_202002-12-2020789": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6692_202024-12-202029": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_87_202014-01-20201961": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_8117_201903-12-2019640": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4945_202025-11-2020892": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_8843_201907-01-20202164": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_494_202029-01-20201324": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3043_201917-05-20192569": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3279_201922-05-20192473": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4052_202003-09-20203274": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5165_202023-10-20201937": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3586_201904-06-20192117": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7569_201901-11-20191590": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_455_202024-01-20201471": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5605_202009-11-20201362": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5936_201907-09-20193155": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_8033_201907-01-20202147": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4952_201924-07-2019822": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8501_201907-12-2019497": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6216_202002-12-2020781": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5358_202028-10-20201897": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4031_202007-09-20203240": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5636_201926-08-2019138": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6796_201901-10-20192264": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6157_202027-11-2020846": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5130_202019-10-20202126": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3006_201914-05-20192684": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4764_202007-10-20202483": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5369_201927-08-2019115": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4757_202006-10-20202538": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4963_202005-11-20201478": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4345_202030-09-20202684": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2226_202014-08-2020301": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5214_201905-08-2019458": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6787_202019-12-2020214": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7843_201919-11-20191049": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_469_202023-01-20201529": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_933_202029-02-2020392": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4890_202019-10-20202109": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4498_201917-07-20191046": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2961_201916-05-20192597": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2897_201901-07-20193451": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_9089_201904-01-20202290": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3955_201919-06-20191871": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8374_201906-12-2019521": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3963_202014-09-20203142": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4350_201915-07-20191122": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3462_201924-05-20192428": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7314_201906-11-20191425": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7398_201926-10-20191659": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4728_202009-10-20202392": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3452_201931-05-20192212": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7123_201919-10-20191891": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6822_202024-12-202033": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7286_201905-11-20191482": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4704_202009-10-20202390": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5331_201901-08-2019572": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6682_201926-09-20192376": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5220_201921-08-2019165": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4874_201920-07-2019938": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5897_202010-11-20201324": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4570_201924-07-2019802": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3663_201903-06-20192161": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5505_201928-08-201972": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3001_201910-06-20192018": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4917_202013-10-20202323": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5309_201930-08-20193439": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6268_202001-12-2020814": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5556_201928-08-201975": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4175_201908-07-20191390": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2830_202010-11-20203656": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6312_201924-09-20192461": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3452_202019-08-2020223": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6213_202025-11-2020915": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6093_201905-09-20193238": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3083_201917-05-20192570": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5075_201902-08-2019521": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2568_201907-05-20192882": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4551_202007-10-20202466": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2325_201928-05-20193732": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4959_201902-08-2019518": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6936_201925-10-20191680": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6451_201921-09-20192595": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6302_202027-11-2020859": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1030_202027-02-2020486": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_624_202017-02-2020702": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_877_202028-02-2020435": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3947_201920-07-2019917": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_535_202024-01-20201484": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_8125_201928-11-2019755": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_784_202024-02-2020581": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3665_202024-08-2020126": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8827_201920-12-2019140": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5321_201928-08-201960": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6153_202027-11-2020845": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5921_201903-09-20193308": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3639_202026-08-202026": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5881_202024-11-2020946": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5142_202019-10-20202127": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4478_201912-07-20191228": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5462_201905-09-20193219": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1528_202018-03-202033": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3179_202009-12-20203485": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4736_202014-10-20202260": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7337_201922-10-20191851": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2833_202007-11-20203672": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7430_201924-10-20191759": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4156_202021-09-20202979": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3289_201922-05-20192474": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4505_201904-07-20191485": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2908_201906-06-20192075": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_8602_201907-01-20202155": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7366_201923-10-20191801": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_597_202024-02-2020570": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4279_201909-07-20191347": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3674_201908-07-20191381": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5295_201919-08-2019194": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1103_202005-03-2020227": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6080_201912-09-20192992": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5828_201929-08-201941": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5395_201902-09-20193343": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3838_202019-09-20203009": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_657_202025-02-2020539": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3196_201910-05-20192766": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7204_201906-11-20191421": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6046_202024-11-2020952": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_417_202013-02-2020844": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3855_201915-06-20191945": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3811_201912-06-20191989": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5306_202002-11-20201646": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5056_201909-08-2019316": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_379_202018-01-20201730": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3512_201901-08-20193132": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5819_201931-08-20193401": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5826_202010-11-20201315": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5154_202020-10-20202061": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4309_201911-07-20191260": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1315_202005-03-2020239": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2395_202014-10-20203853": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_8774_201917-01-20201809": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3424_202024-09-20202842": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3692_201907-06-20192052": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6610_202014-12-2020448": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5863_201931-08-20193403": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4550_201911-07-20191276": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4117_201926-06-20191727": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5544_201908-08-2019384": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6468_201927-09-20192338": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7283_201905-11-20191481": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3874_201926-06-20191725": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3970_201920-06-20191842": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3934_202007-09-20203232": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5383_201919-08-2019203": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6088_202020-11-20201064": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7546_201918-11-20191080": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8858_201918-01-20201740": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3816_202025-09-20202799": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3654_202008-09-20203208": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4319_201915-07-20191121": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7703_201907-11-20191389": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_274_202031-01-20201250": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6339_202003-12-2020742": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4929_201929-07-2019667": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4896_201907-08-2019395": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8417_201905-12-2019563": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3605_201907-06-20192046": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3902_201914-06-20191966": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6743_201928-09-20192323": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7044_201919-10-20191881": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3924_201924-06-20191772": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8193_201904-12-2019609": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6532_201916-09-20192866": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7434_201925-10-20191701": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_187_202001-02-20201229": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5582_202027-11-2020827": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6059_202026-11-2020880": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2998_201903-05-20192947": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4005_202017-09-20203061": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4635_202005-10-20202585": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7300_201918-10-20191962": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5032_202014-10-20202281": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1068_202005-03-2020223": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4322_202024-09-20202859": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5877_201906-09-20193196": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6745_202015-12-2020403": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3536_202025-08-202060": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6524_202007-12-2020620": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6283_201912-09-20192997": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6624_201918-09-20192773": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3467_202018-08-2020272": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5082_202019-10-20202123": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5462_202004-11-20201538": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8001_201930-11-2019699": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3849_202021-09-20202961": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4795_202029-10-20201799": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_9049_201913-01-20202050": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3837_202014-09-20203121": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7455_201925-10-20191702": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7774_201921-11-2019966": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4474_201916-07-20191089": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8070_201920-11-20191020": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6529_201924-09-20192464": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_8669_201916-12-2019258": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6366_201918-09-20192753": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7641_201906-11-20191443": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4373_201909-07-20191350": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8124_201927-11-2019801": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6242_202002-12-2020785": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6659_202016-12-2020343": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_89_202004-02-20201146": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7265_201919-10-20191899": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7137_201926-02-2020493": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6191_201923-09-20192540": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3131_201907-05-20192896": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6101_201902-09-20193371": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_403_202013-02-2020842": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4997_201931-07-2019598": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5764_201926-08-2019144": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6138_201907-09-20193167": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_17_202001-02-20201221": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5529_202005-11-20201489": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5196_201902-08-2019531": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3593_201929-05-20192287": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_8290_201925-11-2019876": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_8541_201907-12-2019502": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8795_201917-12-2019222": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5882_202019-11-20201102": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3409_201927-05-20192351": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4493_202006-10-20202516": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6064_202020-11-20201063": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1012_202003-03-2020331": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7094_201918-10-20191944": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5678_201902-09-20193353": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3614_201903-06-20192154": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6090_201905-09-20193236": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4791_202029-10-20201797": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4689_201917-07-20191063": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6186_201912-09-20192995": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4016_202024-09-20202847": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5185_201905-08-2019456": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_157_202027-01-20201423": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_8609_201912-12-2019395": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1159_202004-03-2020285": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_984_202029-02-2020394": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5380_201907-08-2019402": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4697_201917-07-20191064": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4930_202014-10-20202275": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7418_201924-10-20191757": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3751_201914-06-20191962": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3697_202020-08-2020207": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4799_201902-08-2019514": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2960_201902-05-20192990": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7126_201919-10-20191893": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3830_202014-09-20203119": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5371_201902-08-2019537": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4933_201929-08-20199": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4215_202028-09-20202766": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2312_202008-10-20203873": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4591_201929-07-2019665": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1233_202013-03-202071": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6208_201911-09-20193062": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4095_202008-10-20202410": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6047_201931-08-20193415": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4937_201927-07-2019700": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7699_201906-11-20191447": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5875_201905-09-20193225": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4556_201916-07-20191095": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8741_201920-12-2019139": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3402_201925-07-20193171": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4239_201928-06-20191690": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8121_201927-11-2019798": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2853_202012-11-20203634": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5810_201902-09-20193359": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6518_202014-12-2020438": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4826_201926-07-2019725": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6875_201909-10-20192164": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_633_202014-02-2020804": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5402_202003-11-20201598": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_8550_201909-01-20202485": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_686_202122-01-20214334": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1085_202013-03-2020214": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6_202004-03-2020520": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1221_202017-03-2020166": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_224_202120-01-20214471": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5040_202009-10-20202515": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2861_202102-04-2021601": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1805_202029-07-2020518": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1771_202112-03-20211854": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5293_202019-10-20201980": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1733_202018-05-20201905": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1321_202119-02-20212976": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_133_202111-01-20214937": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_886_202117-03-20211562": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6902_202022-12-2020231": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1160_202106-02-20213661": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7632_201911-12-2019522": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8146_201911-12-2019552": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4683_201901-08-20191172": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_325_202120-01-20214476": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1225_202013-05-20201937": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8321_201911-12-2019565": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4528_202013-10-20202320": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4784_201922-07-20191570": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1193_202012-06-20201469": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2685_202108-04-2021219": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5455_202019-11-20201251": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_50_202111-01-20214927": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5078_201902-08-20191119": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4779_202019-11-20201247": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8360_201909-01-20202473": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5247_201909-08-2019767": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6320_202010-12-2020724": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_980_202006-03-2020424": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_552_202104-02-20213774": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_404_202102-02-20213942": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_469_202120-01-20214488": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7134_202004-01-20215257": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_436_202024-01-20201902": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1979_202003-07-20201193": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_396_202004-03-2020524": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4469_202019-10-20201935": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1111_202116-04-202177": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2688_202010-07-20201032": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1022_202108-02-20213595": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6240_202025-11-20201114": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2560_202107-04-2021279": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6999_202024-12-202054": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_78_202014-05-20202849": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_8033_201904-12-2019745": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4625_202003-12-2020910": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4572_201924-07-20191394": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5636_202017-11-20201349": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5852_202009-11-20201555": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_748_202109-02-20213465": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_642_202017-02-20201247": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_562_202127-01-20214175": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2651_202108-04-2021214": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_63_202015-05-20202815": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7111_202005-01-20215185": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3416_202026-08-202045": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1675_202110-03-20211943": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1123_202013-03-2020222": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7148_202010-03-20211989": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4193_201902-07-20192323": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6800_202011-12-2020690": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7798_201921-11-20191154": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_502_202108-02-20213559": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1934_202115-03-20211767": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4590_202014-10-20202247": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1493_202028-05-20201760": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4436_201905-08-2019992": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5086_202012-10-20202437": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5053_201913-08-2019684": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5065_201931-07-20191288": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1348_202108-03-20212112": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2367_202118-03-20211503": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3549_201905-07-20192169": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1102_202013-03-2020220": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4988_201931-07-20191277": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_244_202027-02-2020777": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_117_202118-01-20214629": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_158_202119-01-20214554": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4619_202009-12-2020778": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1389_202124-02-20212701": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1394_202119-02-20212981": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1204_202019-03-202078": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1847_202026-05-20201824": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1351_202016-03-2020176": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4268_202014-10-20202237": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1281_202110-02-20213403": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6847_202023-12-2020116": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6894_202024-12-202028": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4752_201918-07-20191738": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7136_202005-01-20215189": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1769_202108-03-20212152": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1540_202117-03-20211571": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6922_202024-12-202036": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1182_202013-03-2020229": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5111_202012-10-20202445": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_592_202024-01-20201916": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_509_202122-01-20214322": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2780_202126-03-2021802": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5436_202004-11-20201618": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5617_201920-08-2019392": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4358_202029-10-20201745": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5884_202009-11-20201564": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6524_202022-12-2020203": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6131_202018-12-2020365": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_445_202026-02-2020838": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6189_202025-11-20201108": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8407_201909-01-20202480": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6481_202010-12-2020747": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8704_201907-01-20202583": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6023_202020-11-20201236": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5311_202029-10-20201763": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1964_202016-07-2020927": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2214_202118-03-20211490": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_537_202119-01-20214578": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5873_202027-11-20201032": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_717_202018-02-20201189": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8537_201903-01-20202705": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2306_202119-03-20211379": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2778_202006-08-2020373": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5931_202011-11-20201492": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_135_202010-01-20202387": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_146_202119-01-20214544": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1762_202110-03-20211952": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_272_202006-03-2020368": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2040_202006-06-20201632": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4946_201924-07-20191422": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5546_202029-10-20201784": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1791_202124-02-20212728": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6837_202004-01-20215232": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1775_202019-05-20201879": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_346_202118-01-20214653": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2411_202008-07-20201125": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1468_202105-03-20212294": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_636_202017-02-20201245": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3388_202119-04-202173": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6270_202006-01-20215070": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_61_202014-05-20202839": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1320_202125-02-20212575": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5648_202002-11-20201684": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2010_202115-03-20211777": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1397_202115-02-20213179": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_8137_201911-12-2019548": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_103_202010-01-20202380": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5324_201913-08-2019699": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_38_202004-02-20201574": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5730_201928-08-201956": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3261_202122-04-202132": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2888_202020-07-2020861": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3945_201919-07-20191642": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8288_201912-12-2019498": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4608_202014-10-20202250": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_237_202025-02-2020958": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7441_201923-12-201974": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_925_202017-03-2020127": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7047_201931-10-20192018": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_843_202005-03-2020485": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5125_202016-10-20202094": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5901_202018-11-20201322": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_261_202020-01-20202110": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_757_202110-03-20211907": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6948_201919-11-20191257": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5416_202017-12-2020438": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2038_202118-03-20211475": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4626_202009-12-2020779": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_420_202022-01-20201992": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4815_202013-10-20202331": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6502_201925-10-20192090": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1838_202105-03-20212333": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6377_202020-01-20214497": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5548_202004-11-20201638": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_936_202105-02-20213721": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_461_202115-02-20213138": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8234_201910-12-2019644": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1860_202029-05-20201744": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5133_202013-01-20214832": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_323_202020-01-20202121": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_770_202004-03-2020554": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2968_202028-07-2020588": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4013_202004-11-20201605": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2164_202119-03-20211365": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1804_202105-03-20212330": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5347_202019-10-20201992": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2514_202010-07-20201014": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1142_202109-02-20213502": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2503_202123-03-20211099": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_929_202130-01-20214056": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1593_202115-03-20211750": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1014_202110-02-20213372": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5994_202021-11-20201207": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2734_202125-03-2021895": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5529_201928-08-201936": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6882_202011-01-20214950": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1351_202111-02-20213314": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8616_201903-01-20202710": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2767_202108-04-2021222": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6829_202004-01-20215230": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5817_202027-11-20201029": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6577_202016-12-2020552": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6823_202022-12-2020226": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5309_202022-10-20201875": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4335_202012-10-20202399": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4563_201915-07-20191915": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_632_202004-02-20201564": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_519_202119-01-20214573": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1789_202106-04-2021341": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4799_201917-07-20191812": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7027_202004-01-20215245": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5131_201931-07-20191293": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_77_202113-01-20214814": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5175_202013-10-20202367": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_108_202018-05-20202792": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1873_202106-03-20212225": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_322_202029-01-20201683": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_563_202028-02-2020715": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_27_202105-01-20215143": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5954_202015-12-2020605": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6102_202017-11-20201369": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1773_202105-03-20212325": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1932_202002-06-20201692": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5528_202003-12-2020912": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2331_202008-07-20201119": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3037_202029-07-2020548": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4503_202017-11-20201336": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_45_202026-02-2020857": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4621_201917-07-20191780": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3298_202122-04-202137": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2146_202118-03-20211485": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_220_202021-01-20202042": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_328_202103-02-20213849": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5757_202011-11-20201460": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4627_201924-07-20191399": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_59_202014-05-20202837": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1604_202122-02-20212821": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_70_202017-02-20201262": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7463_201914-11-20191517": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1725_202110-03-20211950": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_264_202019-02-20201138": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3315_201916-07-20191839": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6665_202018-12-2020405": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2872_202017-07-2020919": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_226_202013-01-20202311": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1797_202123-03-20211056": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6838_202023-12-2020108": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_314_202121-01-20214397": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3369_202006-08-2020413": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3028_202023-07-2020737": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_274_202013-02-20201395": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_506_202119-02-20212959": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1058_202012-03-2020295": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_75_202012-02-20201462": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_550_202027-02-2020803": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6633_202018-12-2020389": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8075_201911-12-2019542": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2041_202119-03-20211350": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1860_202106-04-2021342": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3620_202024-08-2020149": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_727_202115-02-20213143": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5240_201913-08-2019691": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1378_202112-02-20213218": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_732_202005-03-2020443": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6201_202027-11-20201057": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2411_202125-03-2021876": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_236_202127-01-20214158": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7843_201910-12-2019605": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1154_202104-02-20213818": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1905_202012-06-20201488": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1241_202018-03-2020113": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2418_202001-07-20201293": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1849_202116-03-20211667": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1493_202102-03-20212463": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5070_202013-10-20202344": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4282_201902-07-20192332": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6244_202027-11-20201064": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8631_201903-01-20202714": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2789_202030-07-2020491": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2495_202009-07-20201076": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1108_202110-02-20213392": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_350_202119-01-20214567": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7744_201927-11-2019965": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_610_202004-02-20201562": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7598_201911-11-20191685": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7222_202014-01-20214784": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6667_202015-12-2020659": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5877_202023-11-20201162": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_388_202024-02-20201073": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1356_202020-03-202048": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1135_202117-03-20211564": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4972_202015-10-20202179": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5210_201913-08-2019688": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4741_201917-07-20191796": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1012_202124-02-20212677": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5639_202003-11-20201675": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_687_202011-03-2020322": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_242_202027-05-20202742": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1197_202105-03-20212274": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_599_202104-02-20213779": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_694_202031-01-20201642": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5911_202018-11-20201326": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_979_202006-03-2020423": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3578_202021-08-2020224": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6928_201924-10-20192162": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5038_202009-10-20202514": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1570_202105-03-20212303": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_832_202020-03-202013": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2588_202119-03-20211397": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8103_201911-12-2019545": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3824_202013-10-20202298": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2815_202105-04-2021459": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8650_201917-01-20202230": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_885_202108-03-20212096": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2618_202016-07-2020946": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4968_202009-10-20202508": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_734_202105-02-20213713": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_8197_201923-12-201982": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7396_201918-11-20191336": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_78_202111-01-20214928": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_75_202014-05-20202846": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6140_202004-12-2020880": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2274_202001-07-20201276": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2000_202009-06-20201577": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1690_202119-03-20211342": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7022_202007-01-20215015": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4341_201926-06-20192683": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_254_202121-01-20214386": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6620_202017-12-2020476": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_281_202019-02-20201142": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1932_202115-03-20211766": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7888_201911-12-2019530": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_51_202013-02-20201369": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4866_202031-10-20201697": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2397_202118-03-20211504": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_384_202021-01-20202053": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2149_202101-04-2021655": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1898_202003-06-20201677": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_330_202027-01-20201818": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_328_202025-02-2020965": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1294_202125-03-2021844": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_399_202005-03-2020457": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6283_202022-12-2020189": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8372_201906-01-20202620": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2676_202101-04-2021681": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6734_202017-12-2020488": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_660_202028-02-2020729": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1426_202118-02-20213016": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6157_202017-12-2020456": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_87_202017-01-20202177": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2347_202124-03-2021983": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_58_202003-06-20201669": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4261_201901-07-20192438": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_611_202026-02-2020909": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4525_201908-08-2019838": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3176_202012-08-2020327": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2799_202102-04-2021599": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_306_202020-01-20202118": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7167_202006-01-20215105": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3581_202024-08-2020140": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1867_202004-06-20201659": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1867_202109-03-20212046": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2361_202003-07-20201214": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_597_202120-01-20214496": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7243_201931-10-20192028": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2220_202003-07-20201202": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2392_202123-03-20211086": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_145_202103-02-20213848": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5524_201914-08-2019654": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5146_202012-10-20202450": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3269_202006-08-2020405": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5677_202029-10-20201805": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6763_202016-12-2020583": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6461_202004-12-2020901": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2188_202106-04-2021350": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5675_202029-10-20201803": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102_202026-02-2020859": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7067_202001-01-20215300": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1198_202013-03-2020230": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5211_202015-10-20202200": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_56_202018-02-20201204": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7745_201922-11-20191088": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5691_202011-11-20201440": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2344_202024-07-2020660": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5622_201926-08-2019204": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_197_202013-01-20202309": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2915_202107-04-2021295": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6677_201923-10-20192248": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6483_202010-12-2020748": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1199_202124-02-20212689": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_997_202108-02-20213591": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5564_202022-10-20201917": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1445_202102-03-20212457": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5207_202014-10-20202283": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3764_202014-10-20202227": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2338_202020-06-20201410": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6351_202003-12-2020933": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6473_202010-12-2020741": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2813_202107-04-2021287": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8724_201927-01-20201857": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_426_202024-01-20201901": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5801_202006-11-20201597": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3840_201928-06-20192512": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1178_202017-03-2020153": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7307_201931-10-20192041": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7435_201905-11-20191866": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5776_201928-08-201966": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1173_202124-02-20212683": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5647_202002-11-20201683": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_242_202114-01-20214753": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_872_202103-02-20213888": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8509_201923-12-2019118": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_629_202025-02-2020930": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6190_202023-11-20201187": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1799_202122-03-20211169": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2364_202003-07-20201216": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_386_202004-03-2020523": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_430_202103-02-20213856": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7015_202001-01-20215293": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6743_202022-12-2020217": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6569_202015-12-2020651": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2689_202010-07-20201033": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4424_201906-07-20192138": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5968_202001-12-2020990": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6105_202027-11-20201048": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4950_202016-10-20202079": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5355_202016-10-20202120": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_262_202028-05-20202723": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6919_202004-01-20215240": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2885_202102-04-2021608": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3338_202119-04-202169": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7817_201922-11-20191097": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3414_202026-08-202043": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4547_201901-07-20192465": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_592_202026-02-2020905": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1113_202108-03-20212098": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7547_201915-11-20191447": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6374_202015-12-2020625": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1263_202009-06-20201563": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3067_202028-07-2020598": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8063_201904-12-2019748": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4989_202013-10-20202335": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_143_202108-02-20213553": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4711_201917-07-20191793": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2113_202124-03-2021966": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4267_202013-10-20202308": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5117_201931-07-20191291": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_352_202027-01-20201820": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5718_202011-11-20201453": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2134_202029-06-20201335": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7055_202006-01-20215087": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5980_202011-11-20201493": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1684_202028-05-20201765": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_329_202125-01-20214229": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7239_201925-10-20192108": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3315_202012-08-2020343": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5204_202009-11-20201514": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_705_202111-02-20213274": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1695_202022-05-20201839": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_352_202019-02-20201152": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_799_202110-02-20213364": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_471_202122-01-20214319": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4269_201917-07-20191761": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_234_202121-01-20214385": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4489_201928-06-20192571": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5477_201926-08-2019178": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1879_202105-03-20212338": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2492_202124-03-2021993": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1094_202110-02-20213390": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_384_202102-02-20213940": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_401_202104-02-20213769": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5433_201914-08-2019645": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7247_202030-01-20214061": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5226_202014-10-20202287": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1976_202110-03-20211971": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2742_202102-04-2021591": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4776_201919-07-20191683": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3596_202026-08-202074": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7166_202006-01-20215104": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1788_202016-06-20201454": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8289_201913-12-2019411": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_429_202019-02-20201164": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5213_202015-10-20202201": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1491_202105-03-20212297": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6522_202009-12-2020828": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6808_202021-12-2020328": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_370_202031-01-20201615": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1730_202105-03-20212319": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5953_202015-12-2020604": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3550_202021-08-2020220": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1363_202108-03-20212115": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_145_202013-01-20202302": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3474_202026-08-202052": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4646_201916-07-20191856": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6772_202017-12-2020492": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8458_201906-01-20202622": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_960_202006-03-2020416": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_736_202004-03-2020545": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1701_202108-03-20212143": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6019_202004-12-2020869": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2330_202106-04-2021359": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2036_202122-03-20211182": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3215_202024-08-2020101": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3071_202005-08-2020433": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5868_202022-12-2020170": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1971_202023-06-20201380": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_264_202028-05-20202725": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1117_202011-03-2020338": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8687_201906-01-20202646": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1455_202015-05-20201923": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7088_202005-01-20215181": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3723_201925-06-20192710": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1857_202112-03-20211859": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2035_202006-06-20201630": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5238_201907-08-2019927": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7237_201914-11-20191509": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_170_202009-01-20202468": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6424_202016-12-2020541": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6847_201923-10-20192253": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4704_201922-07-20191557": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8632_201924-12-201961": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2991_202107-04-2021303": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_583_202024-02-20201026": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2622_202116-04-202182": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2100_202110-03-20211981": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8580_201907-01-20202567": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5510_202029-10-20201777": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2165_202119-04-202141": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5125_201931-07-20191292": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2028_202005-06-20201648": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6632_202018-12-2020388": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4542_201908-07-20192090": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_66_202107-01-20214993": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1784_202112-03-20211855": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_203_202104-02-20213757": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8067_201904-12-2019750": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3529_202021-08-2020216": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5627_201928-08-201943": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7854_201922-11-20191106": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3013_202028-07-2020594": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2285_202123-03-20211071": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5376_201909-08-2019788": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4800_201922-07-20191571": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4478_201917-07-20191769": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6087_202004-12-2020871": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_382_202024-01-20201893": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_13_202017-02-20201257": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_820_202117-02-20213079": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6_202117-02-20213071": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1770_202003-07-20201185": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8618_201909-01-20202489": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7110_202005-01-20215184": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8459_201906-01-20202623": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7200_201922-11-20191077": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_522_202119-01-20214574": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1832_202108-03-20212156": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_962_202012-03-2020276": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4540_202015-10-20202157": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_388_202017-02-20201243": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7974_201927-11-2019987": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2881_202102-04-2021606": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4869_201916-08-2019513": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6585_202021-12-2020284": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2493_202124-03-2021994": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_667_202125-02-20212553": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102_202020-01-20202096": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_670_202027-02-2020824": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1072_202111-02-20213301": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_190_202017-01-20202186": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2523_202001-07-20201304": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3809_202008-10-20202542": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_367_202114-01-20214771": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3539_202024-08-2020133": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5051_202017-10-20202030": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_8327_201903-01-20202694": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3595_202024-08-2020145": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6773_202017-12-2020493": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1718_202110-03-20211946": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6109_202027-11-20201050": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_603_202012-02-20201424": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_948_202115-02-20213154": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2737_202014-07-2020985": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5231_201909-08-2019764": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5890_202009-11-20201566": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4326_201915-07-20191898": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5821_202011-11-20201473": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8009_201904-12-2019740": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1266_202020-03-202035": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4699_201923-07-20191481": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5955_202015-12-2020606": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6487_201923-10-20192243": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_280_202119-01-20214562": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6918_202023-12-2020137": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6825_202022-12-2020227": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1664_202110-03-20211941": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3167_202012-08-2020325": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_410_202120-01-20214479": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4175_202013-10-20202302": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3011_202024-07-2020692": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8353_201910-12-2019649": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1620_202010-06-20201538": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1712_202118-03-20211459": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2640_202010-07-20201026": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6982_202023-12-2020149": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6579_202023-12-202099": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2303_202106-04-2021357": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4029_202015-10-20202145": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4126_201927-06-20192618": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3162_202122-04-202126": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_715_202004-03-2020543": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3821_202013-10-20202297": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102_202109-02-20213446": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7225_202005-01-20215198": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4091_201903-07-20192281": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6768_202005-01-20215159": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1690_202022-05-20201837": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1210_202112-03-20211835": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_209_202120-01-20214460": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_8109_201917-12-2019234": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4096_201916-08-2019504": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1461_202115-03-20211743": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5619_202001-12-2020983": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3053_202112-04-2021141": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7244_202022-01-20214338": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2413_202025-06-20201360": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6295_202002-12-2020964": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2536_202105-04-2021444": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_93_202114-01-20214744": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3102_202005-08-2020435": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2413_202125-03-2021878": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3361_201926-06-20192650": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_313_202021-01-20202043": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5255_201902-08-20191140": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1796_202118-03-20211462": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5952_202015-12-2020603": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_343_202119-01-20214564": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_519_202005-03-2020461": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1906_202124-03-2021962": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_230_202120-01-20214473": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2135_202029-06-20201336": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4347_201901-07-20192449": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_746_202108-03-20212092": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_747_202005-03-2020475": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_945_202104-02-20213807": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8683_201907-01-20202579": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5908_202019-11-20201270": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5881_202011-11-20201487": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_899_202020-03-202015": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2823_202016-07-2020974": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1300_202110-03-20211920": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2989_202122-04-202113": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7354_201905-11-20191854": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2335_202021-07-2020786": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2492_202023-07-2020708": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2194_202016-06-20201461": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3439_202014-08-2020268": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2507_202130-03-2021741": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_530_202028-02-2020713": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_60_202014-05-20202838": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1761_202116-03-20211665": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5753_202006-11-20201594": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2374_202125-03-2021870": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_714_202108-02-20213579": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2860_202022-07-2020767": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_8243_201912-12-2019489": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_276_202125-01-20214228": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_554_202027-02-2020805": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6643_202018-12-2020398": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3048_202027-07-2020640": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3282_202005-08-2020454": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3262_202116-04-2021108": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_232_202120-01-20214474": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7341_201931-10-20192043": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_194_202019-05-20202790": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6927_201924-10-20192161": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1141_202109-02-20213501": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5658_202011-11-20201438": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5657_202004-11-20201650": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4515_201923-07-20191465": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2383_202105-04-2021435": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4744_201905-08-2019996": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_107_202025-02-2020927": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2182_202003-07-20201197": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2495_202122-03-20211208": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1353_202125-03-2021845": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6303_202015-12-2020617": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1389_202020-05-20201848": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3005_202106-04-2021393": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4634_201923-07-20191472": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_123_202113-01-20214818": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1721_202110-03-20211948": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7012_202005-01-20215167": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2373_202001-07-20201284": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6773_201923-10-20192252": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4721_201907-08-2019912": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_219_202022-05-20202756": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6970_202006-01-20215083": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_135_202019-02-20201127": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3297_202122-04-202136": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_469_202024-01-20201907": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2625_202108-04-2021211": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5362_202016-10-20202126": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_512_202026-02-2020895": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4710_201919-07-20191681": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6727_201924-10-20192151": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_520_202031-01-20201623": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5184_202029-10-20201756": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3836_202009-10-20202466": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6941_202007-01-20215013": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2011_202108-03-20212165": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2874_202102-04-2021604": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2101_202116-03-20211693": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4520_202014-10-20202244": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_298_202017-03-2020121": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2008_202005-06-20201646": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_325_202031-01-20201611": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5321_201921-08-2019292": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6145_202009-12-2020792": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5897_202020-11-20201228": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4281_201902-07-20192331": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5865_202027-11-20201031": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6148_202017-12-2020453": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1841_202019-06-20201412": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1437_202125-02-20212582": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_380_202029-01-20201685": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7743_201924-12-20194": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5378_202022-10-20201888": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5692_202011-11-20201441": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3742_201925-06-20192711": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3104_202013-08-2020292": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6050_202017-11-20201364": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2779_202107-04-2021282": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8228_201903-01-20202693": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7475_201911-11-20191673": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_8_202109-02-20213445": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5750_202029-10-20201814": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1580_202125-02-20212606": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500_202026-02-2020894": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7160_202005-01-20215194": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_832_202118-03-20211449": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2368_202119-03-20211384": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_640_202109-02-20213458": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_299_202122-01-20214305": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_8392_201923-12-201991": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1922_202119-03-20211347": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2186_202003-07-20201199": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_142_202007-01-20202552": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7344_201913-11-20191592": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_823_202115-02-20213149": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6152_202010-12-2020716": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3852_201902-07-20192310": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1495_202102-03-20212464": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1458_202102-03-20212460": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4132_201923-07-20191460": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2193_202119-03-20211367": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5311_201907-08-2019933": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2113_202016-06-20201458": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7163_202018-01-20214677": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2231_202016-06-20201466": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5967_202022-12-2020171": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2250_202125-03-2021859": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5504_202004-11-20201628": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1379_202102-03-20212451": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5425_202024-11-20201121": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4791_201923-07-20191483": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8324_201913-12-2019415": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_657_202031-01-20201638": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6453_202004-12-2020899": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7594_201922-11-20191081": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5323_202016-10-20202117": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1827_202109-03-20212040": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1264_202117-02-20213106": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6130_202026-11-20201089": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5412_202009-11-20201519": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_604_202102-03-20212426": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5020_202019-10-20201945": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6403_202007-01-20215005": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3124_202005-08-2020437": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1931_202109-03-20212049": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7075_202018-01-20214673": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7459_201906-11-20191790": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1644_202122-03-20211162": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3007_202012-08-2020315": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1798_202110-03-20211956": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6693_202006-01-20215074": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2384_202008-07-20201121": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_679_202027-02-2020825": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3869_201928-06-20192513": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6854_202023-12-2020119": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_8100_201904-12-2019761": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3110_202006-08-2020380": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6020_202004-12-2020870": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6605_202016-12-2020564": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_349_202105-02-20213700": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8029_201927-11-2019990": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_709_202005-03-2020474": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6951_201915-11-20191423": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6765_202017-12-2020491": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_946_202104-02-20213808": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_161_202119-01-20214557": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2194_202119-03-20211368": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5561_202029-10-20201788": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6472_202010-12-2020740": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5248_202019-10-20201971": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_169_202020-01-20202100": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_8269_201913-12-2019405": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4806_201901-08-20191179": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7490_201911-11-20191675": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5224_201927-08-2019102": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6005_202021-11-20201210": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7234_202005-01-20215202": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3219_202012-08-2020332": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2946_202027-07-2020635": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1155_202019-03-202073": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_335_202020-01-20202125": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5350_202009-11-20201516": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_643_202102-02-20213957": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5081_202014-10-20202274": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_733_202127-01-20214181": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4605_201919-07-20191669": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6766_202018-12-2020412": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1069_202109-02-20213496": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2493_202003-07-20201230": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7303_201931-10-20192039": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3339_202026-08-202030": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5235_201926-08-2019172": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6056_202023-11-20201169": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1469_202105-03-20212295": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6719_202016-12-2020571": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5674_202029-10-20201802": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2396_202119-04-202142": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5203_202015-10-20202197": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7709_201918-11-20191371": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8209_201904-12-2019771": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1090_202109-02-20213499": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2234_202123-03-20211065": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1403_202110-03-20211924": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5613_202011-11-20201432": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5317_202016-10-20202112": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_775_202006-03-2020390": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3180_202021-08-2020180": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4914_202019-10-20201943": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4668_201902-08-20191085": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8106_201911-12-2019546": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5386_202019-11-20201249": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5669_202009-11-20201538": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_610_202125-01-20214251": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6862_202024-12-202019": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_661_202108-02-20213571": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3868_201925-06-20192714": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5659_202011-11-20201439": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_782_202110-02-20213363": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4578_201901-07-20192467": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2228_202108-04-2021205": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2031_202110-03-20211977": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5438_201916-08-2019559": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_214_202111-01-20214942": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4781_201905-08-2019997": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4123_201927-06-20192617": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5537_201922-08-2019267": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_976_202125-02-20212568": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4976_201931-07-20191276": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_390_202024-01-20201895": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6259_202025-11-20201115": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8361_201909-01-20202474": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2080_202116-03-20211687": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1033_202012-05-20201951": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_657_202125-01-20214258": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4481_201928-06-20192570": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5066_202017-10-20202035": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7882_201922-11-20191108": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_82_202013-02-20201371": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_87_202018-02-20201207": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7704_201918-11-20191370": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_29_202105-01-20215145": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_273_202114-01-20214757": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1138_202106-02-20213652": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2348_202010-07-20201008": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4674_201905-08-2019994": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1676_202122-02-20212826": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6622_201906-11-20191767": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7795_201913-12-2019384": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6956_202022-12-2020233": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8265_201912-12-2019493": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1097_202108-02-20213597": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6147_202016-12-2020534": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1127_202124-02-20212682": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1801_202105-03-20212327": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3258_202116-04-2021107": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2706_202010-07-20201034": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2688_202102-04-2021580": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1577_202012-05-20201970": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_265_202121-01-20214391": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5003_201924-07-20191425": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5541_202004-11-20201637": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1904_202117-03-20211581": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5_202117-02-20213070": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_57_202011-05-20202890": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4513_201908-07-20192088": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_667_202027-02-2020822": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_720_202026-02-2020847": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1049_202102-04-2021553": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4846_201919-08-2019430": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5838_202009-11-20201549": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6013_202018-12-2020358": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_669_202104-02-20213785": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_628_202018-02-20201182": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4514_202014-10-20202243": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2959_202024-08-202096": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_119_202113-01-20214817": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8060_201912-12-2019470": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7183_202001-01-20215305": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8363_201916-12-2019326": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5056_201901-08-20191196": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1712_202118-03-20211460": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_98_202024-02-20201046": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1349_202111-02-20213313": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2014_202118-03-20211474": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7224_202004-01-20215264": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_694_202105-02-20213707": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1195_202017-03-2020162": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8306_201916-12-2019319": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6717_202015-12-2020666": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_647_202005-03-2020442": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1361_202108-03-20212114": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_924_202105-02-20213719": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_294_202122-01-20214302": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_112_202003-03-2020591": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8149_201910-12-2019631": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_594_202029-02-2020659": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5031_202017-10-20202029": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_407_202103-02-20213854": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5131_202029-10-20201754": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5255_202016-10-20202108": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1189_202017-03-2020159": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1400_202115-02-20213180": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_576_202110-02-20213359": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6989_202024-12-202049": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5694_202023-11-20201150": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5631_202031-10-20201726": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5689_202007-11-20201574": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5149_202015-10-20202192": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6861_202022-12-2020229": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2412_202125-03-2021877": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6723_202016-12-2020574": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4828_201913-08-2019669": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5834_201910-12-2019586": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6292_202002-12-2020963": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_148_202017-02-20201268": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6250_202003-12-2020929": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3948_201905-07-20192171": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4973_201916-08-2019523": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8727_201910-01-20202417": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1465_202105-03-20212291": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2121_202102-04-2021561": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1713_202105-03-20212316": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5662_202009-12-2020785": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_833_202102-03-20212432": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_45_202121-01-20214379": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3364_202014-08-2020262": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7465_201918-11-20191341": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2969_202107-04-2021299": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8555_201909-01-20202487": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_359_202111-02-20213265": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1180_202112-03-20211834": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1835_202027-05-20201800": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_791_202011-03-2020324": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2177_202122-03-20211187": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7629_201915-11-20191457": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3064_202014-08-2020243": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5621_201919-08-2019456": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1706_202026-05-20201814": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6196_202003-12-2020926": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1332_202008-05-20202004": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4502_201928-06-20192574": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1661_202108-03-20212131": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2166_202010-06-20201557": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5767_201928-08-201964": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2343_202016-07-2020937": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4369_202015-10-20202153": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1890_202003-06-20201676": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3910_202008-10-20202551": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_8035_201927-11-2019992": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_863_202102-02-20213966": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1222_202117-02-20213094": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7092_202011-01-20214951": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_467_202028-02-2020669": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8657_201902-01-20202792": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2983_202028-07-2020589": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5707_202011-11-20201447": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2365_202122-03-20211198": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7065_202024-12-202061": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6413_202002-12-2020979": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4236_201901-07-20192436": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6929_202018-12-2020420": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7157_202007-01-20215026": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3063_202116-04-202194": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4346_201915-07-20191901": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_987_202102-02-20213980": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1242_202005-06-20201638": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2497_202001-07-20201302": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2292_202122-03-20211195": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6199_202017-12-2020459": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7336_201931-10-20192042": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7972_201903-01-20202687": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_693_202105-02-20213706": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5313_201908-08-2019873": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7735_201920-11-20191220": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_269_202028-05-20202730": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_8225_201917-12-2019241": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1115_202108-03-20212099": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7256_202030-01-20214067": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_54_202113-01-20214813": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_551_202115-02-20213139": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_267_202028-05-20202728": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5618_201926-08-2019202": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4665_201917-07-20191787": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8256_201910-12-2019648": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2325_202105-04-2021432": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5631_201921-08-2019309": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7070_202007-01-20215016": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6015_202021-11-20201214": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6931_202018-12-2020422": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2191_202008-07-20201112": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_59_202112-01-20214880": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7787_201910-12-2019601": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5912_202005-01-20215156": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_551_202027-02-2020804": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2125_202029-06-20201334": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2594_202009-07-20201087": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_199_202118-01-20214641": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1653_202027-05-20201783": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3606_202021-08-2020230": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1552_202027-05-20201778": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_681_202102-02-20213962": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5168_202011-11-20201398": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_18_202105-01-20215134": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4257_201914-08-2019606": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6311_202015-12-2020619": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6647_202018-12-2020400": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5448_202022-10-20201901": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_879_202102-02-20213974": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_531_202130-01-20214049": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1386_202124-02-20212699": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7902_201911-12-2019531": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2102_202116-03-20211694": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1965_202010-07-20201001": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1999_202006-06-20201626": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2088_202119-03-20211356": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_186_202114-01-20214751": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5719_202011-11-20201454": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_344_202119-01-20214565": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_294_202020-01-20202114": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1002_202105-02-20213725": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_264_202109-02-20213448": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_196_202020-05-20202766": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2882_202106-04-2021388": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_12_202011-05-20202878": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7563_201913-11-20191612": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1870_202105-03-20212336": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3579_202026-08-202070": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_571_202102-02-20213950": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1105_202019-03-202066": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8394_201923-12-201992": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4366_202031-10-20201695": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7252_201924-01-20201917": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_8213_201910-12-2019637": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5373_202004-11-20201613": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6486_202010-12-2020750": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4222_202015-10-20202148": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4551_202014-10-20202245": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7802_201921-11-20191157": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5498_201921-08-2019301": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2299_202024-07-2020659": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_501_202011-06-20201504": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_316_202003-03-2020595": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_520_202122-02-20212799": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6779_202017-12-2020496": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6790_202007-01-20215007": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7657_201920-11-20191211": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4256_202014-10-20202236": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_152_202009-01-20202464": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_587_202103-02-20213868": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4364_202014-10-20202239": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5894_202003-12-2020917": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6075_202027-11-20201045": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4615_202014-10-20202252": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_8255_201916-12-2019310": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_352_202121-01-20214400": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1186_202104-03-20212357": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6616_202024-12-202016": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5851_202004-01-20215224": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6343_202001-12-20201010": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7654_201918-11-20191363": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2483_202010-07-20201011": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6835_202017-12-2020505": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1628_202125-03-2021848": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2892_202024-07-2020676": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6423_202016-12-2020540": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1839_202105-03-20212334": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_79_202119-01-20214540": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6501_202018-01-20214664": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1488_202112-03-20211842": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2301_202106-04-2021355": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_556_202029-01-20201710": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7761_201928-11-2019876": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7448_201920-11-20191205": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1174_202015-05-20201915": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2599_202119-04-202146": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1163_202115-03-20211735": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_463_202103-02-20213858": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_639_202004-02-20201566": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1897_202130-03-2021732": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_175_202017-02-20201270": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2843_202107-04-2021288": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6304_202009-12-2020799": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6908_202024-12-202034": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5845_202023-11-20201155": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_481_202027-01-20201838": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2741_202027-07-2020622": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1941_202108-03-20212163": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1767_202115-03-20211757": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5413_202019-10-20202001": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4124_201925-06-20192723": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6594_202016-12-2020558": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2807_202024-07-2020669": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6155_202021-12-2020266": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3954_201924-07-20191387": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7133_202006-01-20215100": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_513_202125-01-20214246": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1700_202010-06-20201539": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_208_202119-02-20212957": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_624_202103-02-20213872": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2875_202021-07-2020821": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4671_201922-07-20191551": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2775_202020-07-2020853": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_52_202017-02-20201260": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6805_202018-12-2020413": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6742_202022-12-2020216": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_568_202102-02-20213949": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_294_202030-05-20202704": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3049_202027-07-2020641": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1645_202102-03-20212477": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4520_201915-07-20191909": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5612_202011-11-20201431": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2655_202130-03-2021764": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4664_202016-10-20202070": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_762_202109-02-20213474": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4955_201922-07-20191590": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5895_202018-11-20201320": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_68_202105-01-20215153": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2726_202102-04-2021587": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5983_202027-11-20201038": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2435_202130-03-2021740": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8122_201904-12-2019765": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1047_202012-03-2020293": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_558_202028-01-20201777": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_189_202120-01-20214459": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_920_202109-02-20213485": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3260_202005-08-2020451": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4912_201909-08-2019743": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3390_202014-08-2020265": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1875_202105-03-20212337": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6401_202009-12-2020807": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4716_201922-07-20191560": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_575_202031-01-20201626": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1206_202012-05-20201954": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2349_202101-04-2021658": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7764_201921-11-20191148": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_641_202027-02-2020814": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1697_202102-03-20212479": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_204_202013-02-20201392": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_106_202022-01-20201963": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3072_202028-07-2020599": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5320_202019-10-20201989": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3188_202006-08-2020391": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6884_202004-01-20215239": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_105_202010-01-20202382": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1059_202102-03-20212434": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1226_202124-02-20212691": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3022_202030-07-2020500": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4199_201909-07-20192041": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5100_202019-10-20201950": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_644_202127-01-20214180": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_85_202007-01-20202550": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4872_201924-07-20191414": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_483_202109-02-20213450": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3295_202116-04-2021114": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1896_202008-07-20201104": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5453_202004-11-20201623": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1362_202024-07-2020650": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5732_201926-08-2019216": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4675_201905-08-2019995": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4532_201901-07-20192463": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_984_202101-02-20214008": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_17_202105-01-20215133": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4465_201905-07-20192188": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_859_202110-02-20213368": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2334_202016-07-2020936": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5456_202019-10-20202003": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4855_201931-07-20191272": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6161_202017-12-2020457": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2440_202124-03-2021988": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2033_202105-03-20212342": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6925_201923-10-20192255": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_924_202012-03-2020269": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8693_201909-01-20202496": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_596_202026-02-2020906": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6807_202018-12-2020415": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2103_202110-03-20211982": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1330_202019-03-202091": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8328_201923-12-201984": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2917_202106-04-2021389": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3785_201915-07-20191888": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1422_202125-03-2021846": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1332_202124-02-20212698": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2923_202022-07-2020771": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5033_202013-10-20202337": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6299_202002-12-2020967": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_422_202121-01-20214403": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2294_202119-03-20211376": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5613_201926-08-2019200": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6603_202018-01-20214668": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1097_202012-03-2020301": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1896_202118-03-20211465": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1770_202108-03-20212153": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_835_202012-03-2020259": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_685_202125-01-20214262": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_320_202025-02-2020964": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_264_202017-01-20202207": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5654_202002-11-20201686": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_96_202016-05-20202808": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3426_202021-08-2020197": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2755_202124-03-20211005": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3427_202021-08-2020198": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7899_201928-11-2019887": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6942_202023-12-2020142": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2735_202017-07-2020904": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4574_201905-07-20192209": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2972_202107-04-2021302": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6350_202015-12-2020622": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6150_202009-12-2020795": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5113_201908-08-2019853": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6729_202022-12-2020213": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4868_201916-08-2019512": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_693_202031-01-20201641": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2218_202117-03-20211602": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1323_202109-03-20212018": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5076_202025-11-20201093": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6587_202016-12-2020554": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_338_202021-01-20202045": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7228_202006-01-20215109": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_535_202130-01-20214052": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4313_201902-07-20192333": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2764_202105-04-2021451": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1134_202122-02-20212807": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6927_202018-12-2020418": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6016_202018-12-2020359": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5640_202005-11-20201599": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5055_201920-08-2019359": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2727_202106-04-2021378": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2096_202006-08-2020366": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1680_202108-03-20212138": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7717_201920-11-20191213": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_241_202013-01-20202313": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6660_202021-12-2020290": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4733_201924-07-20191403": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1981_202005-06-20201645": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_621_202103-02-20213870": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1246_202016-03-2020175": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2568_202006-07-20201172": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5549_202009-11-20201529": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1428_202102-03-20212452": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6762_202015-12-2020672": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5322_201913-08-2019698": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_686_202017-02-20201249": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4765_201924-07-20191407": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5080_201902-08-20191120": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_742_202004-03-2020547": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4445_202013-10-20202319": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3575_202026-08-202069": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4265_202015-10-20202149": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5427_202024-11-20201122": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4119_201902-07-20192318": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5592_201920-08-2019391": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2030_202001-06-20201719": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1638_202112-04-2021119": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_8242_201910-01-20202405": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8526_201902-01-20202779": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6598_202021-12-2020287": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_914_202104-02-20213805": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5228_202019-10-20201967": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5166_202013-10-20202362": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1143_202109-02-20213503": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_354_202027-01-20201822": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3305_202119-04-202166": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4358_201902-07-20192346": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6059_202023-11-20201172": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7773_201904-12-2019722": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_713_202017-02-20201251": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4278_201908-07-20192067": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6506_202022-12-2020200": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6493_202018-12-2020379": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1984_202108-03-20212164": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4941_202015-10-20202171": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5329_201909-08-2019780": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4185_202031-10-20201693": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4966_201916-08-2019522": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3003_202024-07-2020690": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8318_201912-12-2019502": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_538_202130-01-20214053": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_656_202028-02-2020728": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2619_202016-07-2020947": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2425_202123-03-20211089": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_73_202024-02-20201044": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6388_202009-12-2020804": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_8671_201906-01-20202638": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2545_202124-03-2021998": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4417_202009-10-20202476": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6822_202019-01-20214584": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_385_202025-02-2020972": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2627_202105-04-2021446": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2490_202003-07-20201229": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4787_202016-10-20202074": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1424_202110-03-20211925": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4450_201919-07-20191661": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1295_202110-03-20211918": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_641_202109-02-20213459": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5325_202016-10-20202118": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1301_202123-03-20211047": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3043_202119-04-202161": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2607_202016-07-2020943": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7267_202005-02-20213742": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2187_202022-07-2020747": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3263_202116-04-2021109": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_866_202102-02-20213969": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5634_202029-10-20201797": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2056_202110-03-20211978": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1606_202109-03-20212027": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_304_202001-06-20202693": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5709_201921-08-2019316": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_899_202116-03-20211643": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_950_202110-02-20213370": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5180_202011-11-20201401": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_268_202028-05-20202729": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_594_202028-01-20201785": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_521_202130-01-20214044": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_353_202027-01-20201821": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5451_202004-11-20201622": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7114_202005-01-20215186": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7083_201901-11-20191944": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_744_202003-03-2020618": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_356_202027-01-20201823": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5927_202017-12-2020447": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5_202017-02-20201256": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_85_202025-02-2020953": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6986_202024-12-202048": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1204_202102-03-20212443": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6654_202018-12-2020404": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3228_202031-07-2020478": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8253_201913-12-2019403": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2654_202112-04-2021126": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_147_202019-02-20201129": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3939_201928-06-20192519": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5907_202019-11-20201269": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7308_201911-11-20191654": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_432_202119-03-20211331": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7_202118-01-20214626": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6575_202023-12-202098": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6146_202009-12-2020793": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_355_202111-02-20213263": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5497_201920-08-2019379": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4751_201901-08-20191174": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_271_202024-02-20201064": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1720_202105-03-20212318": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2_202105-02-20213692": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_323_202114-01-20214766": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5420_202019-10-20202002": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_928_202130-01-20214055": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5383_202009-11-20201517": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2145_202118-03-20211484": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5318_202016-10-20202113": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7687_201918-11-20191367": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7302_201925-10-20192113": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8535_201909-01-20202484": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6132_202016-12-2020530": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_124_202027-05-20202735": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4373_201902-07-20192350": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8126_201910-12-2019627": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_24_202022-01-20201961": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8415_201924-12-201926": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5159_202014-10-20202277": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8408_201923-12-201997": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1376_202019-03-202095": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2637_202010-07-20201025": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5233_202022-10-20201857": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5236_201907-08-2019926": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6810_202018-12-2020416": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5244_202029-10-20201757": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6297_202002-12-2020966": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6479_202010-12-2020745": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2955_202108-04-2021230": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_353_202109-02-20213449": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_720_202124-02-20212664": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_699_202028-09-2020764": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1124_201924-10-2019387": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_782_201914-08-201996": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_801_202019-11-2020324": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_73_202018-02-2020147": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1013_202004-12-2020221": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_800_202020-10-2020566": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_326_202026-06-2020315": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_615_202030-09-2020729": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_342_202017-07-2020212": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_239_202117-03-2021135": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1138_202018-12-202033": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_350_202118-03-2021112": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_858_202002-09-20202237": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1146_201926-10-2019366": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_220_202029-05-2020541": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_277_202027-07-2020159": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2_202027-02-2020102": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_309_202105-04-202158": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_724_201923-07-2019188": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_79_202012-06-2020452": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1113_201913-11-2019283": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_98_202012-02-2020763": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_817_202022-10-2020532": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_379_202118-03-2021118": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1015_202007-01-2021834": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_289_202108-03-2021222": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1141_201906-11-2019318": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1233_201928-11-2019210": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_642_201902-07-2019289": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_803_202005-10-2020683": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1029_202018-12-202026": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_147_202018-03-202014": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_398_202127-04-202110": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_907_201904-09-2019758": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_535_201931-05-2019398": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_429_202117-03-2021146": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1046_202027-11-2020250": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_514_202127-04-202113": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_300_202019-06-2020387": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1114_201913-11-2019284": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_846_202027-01-2021669": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_209_202008-06-2020498": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_74_202118-02-2021379": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1344_201901-01-2020504": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_158_202109-02-2021460": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_55_202109-02-2021452": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_792_202003-11-2020459": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_887_201905-09-2019748": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_679_202028-10-2020508": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_775_201909-08-2019112": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_26_202013-02-2020186": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_693_202025-09-2020779": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_456_202126-04-202121": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1278_201904-12-2019164": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1001_201903-10-2019524": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1228_202028-10-20201715": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_579_202023-09-2020815": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_309_202023-06-2020359": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_520_202007-09-2020947": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_487_202019-08-202055": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1293_201902-12-2019177": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_513_202027-08-20201027": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_63_202012-02-2020195": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_333_202013-07-2020235": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1079_202021-01-2021705": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_603_202025-09-2020778": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2_202118-01-2021751": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1201_202005-02-2021514": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_831_201922-08-201945": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_441_202018-08-202060": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_641_201902-07-2019288": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_161_202020-06-2020369": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1365_202024-11-20201381": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1170_202001-01-2021888": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_508_202003-09-2020975": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_481_202126-04-202123": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_987_202004-01-2021875": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_16_202007-01-2020451": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_243_202028-05-2020548": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_667_202019-09-2020850": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1370_202024-11-20201386": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1196_202010-02-2021438": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_92_202008-07-2020250": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_498_201915-05-2019457": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_12_202106-01-2021844": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_125_202017-03-202022": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_267_202005-03-2020566": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_515_202012-08-202089": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_150_202101-03-2021315": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_830_201905-09-2019744": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_253_202016-06-2020426": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_562_202028-08-20201021": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_443_202004-08-2020116": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_52_202021-01-2020368": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_509_202017-08-202071": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1162_202018-12-202036": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_349_202003-07-2020295": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_467_202031-07-2020126": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_545_201904-06-2019381": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_668_202030-07-2020729": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_215_202017-06-2020417": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_226_202101-03-2021319": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_331_202010-06-2020478": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_967_201918-09-2019660": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_730_202029-09-2020755": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1425_201903-01-2020491": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1030_201903-10-2019526": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_37_202015-02-2020168": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1210_201916-11-2019259": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1048_202010-12-2020169": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_475_202107-04-202155": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_600_202007-09-2020950": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_764_202003-10-2020700": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1025_201921-09-2019619": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_650_202005-10-2020677": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_96_202028-02-2020100": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_66_202012-02-2020202": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_132_202118-02-2021380": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1107_201918-10-2019420": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_657_202005-09-2020966": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1164_201901-11-2019349": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1017_201928-09-2019558": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1102_201918-10-2019417": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_968_202006-01-2021847": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8_202009-07-2020244": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_621_202019-09-2020846": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_680_202028-10-2020509": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1062_201918-10-2019413": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_218_202120-03-202186": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_445_202014-08-202078": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_169_202105-02-2021507": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_523_202021-08-202037": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4_202106-02-2021485": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_394_202109-03-2021199": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1126_201924-10-2019389": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_761_202007-10-2020636": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_917_202010-12-2020158": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_646_202001-10-2020705": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_996_202018-12-202022": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1219_201928-11-2019208": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_240_202118-03-2021109": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_76_202003-02-2020291": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_29_202006-02-2020252": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_17_202011-02-2020209": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1041_201915-10-2019454": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_504_202005-12-2020206": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_82_202103-02-2021551": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1081_202008-01-2021818": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_66_202102-02-2021572": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_283_202023-07-2020175": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_90_202030-01-2020316": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_234_202012-05-2020566": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_942_202026-04-202124": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_610_202015-09-2020893": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_962_202007-11-2020400": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_160_202110-02-2021433": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_567_201911-06-2019360": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_487_202130-04-20213": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1129_201915-11-2019269": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1108_201901-11-2019345": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1208_202004-02-2021536": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1200_201920-11-2019256": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_111_202002-06-2020519": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1040_202010-12-2020166": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_903_202009-12-2020183": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_771_201906-08-2019126": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_180_202119-03-202197": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_199_202003-06-2020516": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_135_202108-02-2021479": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_75_202013-03-202032": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_56_202109-02-2021453": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_44_202017-02-2020159": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1198_202027-01-2021678": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_472_202017-08-202068": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_836_201930-08-2019787": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1068_202018-01-2021754": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1104_202028-01-2021641": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_721_201923-07-2019187": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_970_202019-11-2020328": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_538_201904-06-2019376": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_285_202016-06-2020427": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_194_202112-02-2021406": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_341_202117-03-2021140": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_754_202003-11-2020454": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_633_201928-06-2019302": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_336_202120-03-202191": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_465_202120-03-202194": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_694_202025-09-2020780": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_719_202001-10-2020715": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_969_201912-09-2019713": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_830_202023-12-20203": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_841_202023-10-2020524": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1350_201918-12-201946": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_479_201904-05-2019511": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_336_202004-07-2020284": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_454_202018-08-202061": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_251_202103-03-2021270": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1071_201911-10-2019475": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_67_202003-03-202086": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_804_202005-10-2020684": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_662_202009-09-2020934": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1076_201914-10-2019466": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1147_201915-11-2019270": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_656_202019-09-2020847": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_421_202021-07-2020196": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_314_202024-06-2020327": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_203_202110-02-2021436": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_212_202020-07-2020200": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_763_202006-10-2020661": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_440_202031-07-2020125": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_390_202109-03-2021198": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1356_201927-01-2020347": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_665_202030-07-2020726": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_239_202027-05-2020551": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1005_202027-11-2020245": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_566_201914-06-2019345": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_876_202020-10-2020570": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_273_202015-06-2020438": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1206_202028-04-20218": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1139_201926-10-2019365": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1135_202008-01-2021823": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_614_201903-07-2019274": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_670_201918-07-2019215": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_567_202019-09-2020842": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_91_202028-01-2020333": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_658_202006-10-2020657": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_771_202030-09-2020741": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_616_202030-09-2020730": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_87_202006-02-2020255": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_23_202121-01-2021695": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_473_202107-04-202154": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_825_202017-12-202042": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_434_202027-07-2020160": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1354_201918-12-201948": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_837_201916-09-2019666": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_167_202118-02-2021382": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_542_201904-06-2019378": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_70_202008-06-2020491": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1002_201924-10-2019383": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1117_202025-02-2021353": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1151_201918-10-2019424": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_221_202110-02-2021437": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_21_202008-01-2020439": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_305_202120-03-202189": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_330_202031-07-2020118": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_262_202102-03-2021303": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_846_201921-08-201954": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1284_201910-12-2019122": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1074_201902-12-2019170": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_972_202019-01-2021737": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_418_202024-07-2020172": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_753_201913-08-201998": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_905_202005-12-2020211": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_165_202030-05-2020532": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_721_202019-11-2020319": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_829_202020-10-2020568": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1101_201918-10-2019416": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_432_202030-07-2020132": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_521_201929-05-2019413": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_118_202002-03-202094": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_966_202004-01-2021873": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_718_202001-10-2020714": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_356_202008-07-2020254": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1263_201928-11-2019213": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_86_202005-02-2020277": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_260_202125-02-2021351": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_118_202105-02-2021504": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_291_202119-04-20213": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_493_201909-05-2019488": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_577_201914-06-2019346": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_35_202007-02-2020247": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_663_201916-07-2019227": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_26_202012-02-2020198": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1009_202005-02-2021512": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1140_202008-01-2021825": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_166_202020-03-20206": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_185_202117-02-2021394": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_552_202030-09-2020728": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_536_202119-04-202110": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_112_202006-02-2020256": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_246_202102-03-2021302": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_590_201919-06-2019330": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1140_201921-11-2019246": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_209_202115-02-2021399": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1099_201917-10-2019434": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_536_201931-05-2019399": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1129_202012-01-2021786": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_818_201921-08-201951": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1184_202018-01-2021758": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_99_202012-02-2020764": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_556_202028-08-20201020": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_503_202022-09-2020835": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_564_201911-06-2019359": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_482_201902-05-2019523": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_885_202008-09-20202174": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_329_202102-03-2021307": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_738_202006-10-2020660": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_993_202024-11-2020276": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_182_202109-02-2021463": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_64_202020-02-2020130": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_145_202017-03-202025": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1376_201905-09-20191176": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1082_202008-01-2021819": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_299_202118-03-2021110": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_649_201908-07-2019251": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_183_202104-02-2021534": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_164_202125-02-2021343": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_745_202019-11-2020320": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1331_201912-12-201996": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_21_202003-02-2020297": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_862_201931-08-2019783": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_677_202006-10-2020658": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_86_202104-02-2021529": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1364_201904-01-2020469": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1283_202006-11-20201565": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1020_202002-12-2020229": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_291_202006-07-2020271": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_26_202121-01-2021698": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_46_202102-02-2021570": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1032_202019-08-202063": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3100072_201906-08-2019345": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1288_202022-09-2020798": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_698_201928-06-2019822": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_87_202013-02-2020330": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2013_202012-01-20211202": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1607_202011-11-2020365": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000172_201925-09-20191103": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102_202129-01-2021938": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_582_201903-05-20191142": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2600018_201910-12-2019197": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_406_202018-06-2020376": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_30049_201901-05-20191177": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_34_202020-01-2020685": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_564_201903-05-20191138": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1123_202025-08-202049": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_569_201903-05-20191140": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_613_202016-06-2020399": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_970_202020-07-2020146": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_617_201909-05-20191111": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_601_202120-04-20217": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2600005_201927-09-20191038": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1740_202008-12-2020147": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_704_201929-05-2019934": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2900224_201904-12-2019254": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_700144_201920-08-2019152": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1301_202029-09-2020732": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1057_201920-08-2019145": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1922_202005-01-20211269": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_839_202006-07-2020269": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1883_202007-12-2020190": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_186_202111-02-2021772": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_12_202102-02-2021901": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_798_201903-07-2019776": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_984_201902-08-2019419": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_172_202015-02-2020301": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1459_202005-11-2020407": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1533_201906-11-2019533": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2900233_201919-12-201979": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7000199_201907-11-2019519": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1488_202013-10-2020651": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_767_202021-07-2020115": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_943_202010-09-2020935": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1769_202008-12-2020153": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_824_201909-07-2019700": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1496_202027-10-2020546": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_260_202108-02-2021815": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_228_202119-02-2021697": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_167_202126-02-2021576": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1478_202028-10-2020534": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1912_202022-12-202045": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_678_201930-05-2019924": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_879_202022-07-2020110": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3100105_201916-12-2019120": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1318_202023-09-2020776": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1983_202001-01-20211297": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1426_202004-11-2020426": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_223_202103-03-2021509": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5000009_201924-10-2019706": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1082_202026-08-202022": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_871_201924-07-2019544": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1218_202021-09-2020820": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1778_202024-11-2020278": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_66_202127-01-2021997": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1731_201912-12-2019169": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1528_202003-11-2020445": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3100103_201913-11-2019484": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_135_202023-01-2020607": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_901_202014-07-2020187": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_105_202006-02-2020413": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1975_202023-12-202033": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_189_202030-01-2020496": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1559_201915-11-2019461": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1676_202011-11-2020371": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_180_202023-01-2020611": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1831_201913-01-2020803": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_922_202020-07-2020140": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_700113_201917-07-2019616": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1550_202006-11-2020397": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_915_202016-07-2020160": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1768_201923-12-201911": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_650_202106-04-202169": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3100077_201916-08-2019211": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1091_202031-08-20201063": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_70071_201902-05-20191160": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3200040_201918-12-201996": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_617_202105-04-202179": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_90_202101-02-2021918": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_167_202021-01-2020660": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000158_201916-09-20191262": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_930_201902-08-2019414": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_296_202009-07-2020210": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_575_201913-05-20191085": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2019_202007-01-20211230": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_746_201924-06-2019865": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_740_202024-06-2020345": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1600_202027-10-2020561": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_300_202004-03-2020116": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1472_201918-11-2019442": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7000164_201902-09-20191470": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_878_201925-07-2019516": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_328_202019-05-2020534": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1173_202023-09-2020770": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1669_202023-11-2020285": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_645_201921-05-20191003": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_204_202104-02-2021865": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_335_202125-03-2021201": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1383_201910-10-2019867": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2900213_201912-12-2019173": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3200012_201927-09-20191041": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1456_201907-11-2019504": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_935_201926-07-2019502": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_274_202104-03-2021488": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1513_202004-11-2020429": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1313_202016-09-2020899": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_772_202008-07-2020233": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2900229_201916-12-2019119": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_712_201930-05-2019926": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_608_202112-04-202145": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_81_202014-01-2020770": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_629_202120-04-20218": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_391_202028-10-2020528": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2600002_201921-08-2019132": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_647_201917-05-20191035": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1028_202025-08-202041": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_303_202005-03-202095": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1717_202009-12-2020128": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1749_201919-12-201975": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_266_202126-02-2021578": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_260_202015-05-2020542": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1900_202005-01-20211267": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1930_202006-01-20211249": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1222_202010-09-2020943": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_577_202101-04-2021143": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_882_201910-07-2019690": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1179_202031-08-20201076": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1766_202008-12-2020150": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_43_202125-01-20211023": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_684_202030-06-2020309": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2_202020-01-2020679": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_679_202001-07-2020300": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_945_201924-07-2019547": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_887_202009-07-2020225": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_958_202005-10-2020679": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1689_202011-11-2020373": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1461_202014-10-2020636": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_49_202021-01-2020644": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_562_201903-05-20191137": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1149_202027-08-20201098": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_926_202020-07-2020141": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_371_202019-03-202021": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_851_201902-08-2019409": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_931_201923-07-2019561": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1061_202026-08-202018": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_538_201901-05-20191170": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1_202001-01-2020898": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1946_202006-01-20211250": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1595_202027-10-2020558": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_608_201908-07-2019710": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1375_202001-10-2020700": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1130_202031-08-20201070": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1126_202003-09-20201019": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_773_202009-07-2020214": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_953_201925-07-2019526": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1891_202007-12-2020192": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5000018_201925-11-2019366": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_110_202006-02-2020418": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2003_202007-01-20211226": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_205_202027-01-2020573": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1610_202018-11-2020338": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_332_202123-02-2021640": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1254_202010-09-2020950": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_711_201927-06-2019836": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_273_202119-02-2021700": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1094_202026-08-202026": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_538_202124-03-2021244": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1605_202019-11-2020321": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5000010_201923-10-2019733": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1410_202001-10-2020706": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_941_202031-08-20201055": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1991_202013-01-20211173": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_590_202001-06-2020480": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_304_202116-03-2021350": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1768_202008-12-2020152": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_655_201922-05-2019991": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_938_201924-07-2019546": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_661_202017-06-2020390": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_855_202009-07-2020220": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_405_202002-03-2021536": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_531_202101-04-2021136": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_833_201919-07-2019587": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_596_202106-04-202168": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_551_202124-03-2021246": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_733_202002-07-2020291": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1029_201930-07-2019481": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1730_201919-12-201974": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1236_202017-09-2020853": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_606_201908-05-20191124": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1129_202031-08-20201069": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_912_202015-07-2020171": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000163_201906-09-20191405": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_881_201925-07-2019517": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_294_202019-03-202017": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2900202_201915-11-2019462": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_925_201923-07-2019558": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_985_201901-08-2019442": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_227_202019-03-202015": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_852_202031-08-20201054": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_663_202008-07-2020229": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1996_202021-12-202057": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_40_202020-01-2020691": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_700101_201906-07-2019727": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_321_202020-03-202010": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_700100_201901-07-2019813": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_166_202020-02-2020232": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_784_201901-07-2019808": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1833_202005-01-20211265": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_247_202102-03-2021524": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_928_201925-07-2019523": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3200029_201919-11-2019420": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_29_202125-01-20211022": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1747_202020-11-2020310": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1328_202023-09-2020777": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1608_201929-11-2019303": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_717_201903-07-2019771": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1008_201907-08-2019314": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1770_202008-12-2020154": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_883_201911-07-2019677": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3100050_201921-05-20191006": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3_202020-01-2020680": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000188_201923-10-2019734": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_301_202004-03-2020117": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1000_202019-09-2020837": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1647_202002-11-2020471": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1432_202014-10-2020634": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_133_202021-01-2020657": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1348_202001-10-2020698": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_780_201928-06-2019828": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_906_202013-07-2020207": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_530_201914-05-20191063": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_57_202022-01-2020619": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1072_202025-08-202046": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_133_202013-02-2020332": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1608_202004-11-2020437": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1739_202003-12-2020230": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_310079_201928-08-201947": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1243_202029-09-2020727": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1191_202016-09-2020881": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_140_202013-02-2020333": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1803_201920-12-201952": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_670_202016-06-2020405": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_648_202101-04-2021147": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_734_202018-06-2020382": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101_202104-02-2021860": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1855_202007-12-2020184": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_274_202025-02-2020202": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1614_201929-11-2019304": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_217_202020-02-2020238": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_121_202104-02-2021862": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1338_201926-09-20191065": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_969_202022-07-2020112": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_145_202026-02-2020177": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1408_202030-09-2020722": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1535_201907-11-2019508": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_320_202102-03-2021531": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_409_202102-03-2021537": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1012_202021-09-2020815": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_646_201921-05-20191004": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_745_202002-07-2020292": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_856_201930-07-2019466": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_720_201906-06-2019895": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_856_202013-07-2020198": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_671_202009-07-2020211": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_36_202003-02-2020463": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1557_201915-11-2019459": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1031_201902-08-2019428": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_579_202124-03-2021248": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1728_201921-01-2020661": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_358_202117-03-2021311": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_727_201925-06-2019850": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_62_202113-01-20211166": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_23_202127-01-2021993": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_654_202006-07-2020258": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_179_202105-02-2021836": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_166_202101-02-2021922": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1958_202006-01-20211253": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3000157_201922-08-2019118": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_27_202021-01-2020640": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_598_201916-05-20191043": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_833_202008-07-2020239": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2900221_201929-11-2019306": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_700_201906-06-2019893": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_560_202028-05-2020498": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_619_201909-05-20191113": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1011_201930-07-2019480": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_290230_201910-12-2019194": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1598_202002-12-2020235": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1553_201929-11-2019298": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101986_201914-10-20191386": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101437_201920-08-2019217": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102979_202013-11-2020897": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101622_201929-08-201915": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101485_201921-08-2019184": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101691_202007-07-2020427": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103247_202010-12-2020397": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5100100_201924-09-20191687": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100712_202006-03-2020176": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_103422_202014-12-2020252": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100444_202026-02-2020276": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3612777_202004-12-20204015": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102098_202011-09-20202063": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100242_202121-01-20211771": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100207_202118-01-20211881": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101115_202012-06-2020863": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101736_202013-08-2020131": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102082_202021-08-202028": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101759_201911-09-20192084": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100616_202105-03-2021972": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101550_202029-06-2020576": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102482_202006-10-20201787": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_120001_202020-08-20201226": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103329_202008-12-2020447": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102295_202018-09-20202000": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100215_202101-02-20211492": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102185_202001-09-20202177": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100167_202128-01-20211615": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102441_202029-10-20201365": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103099_202024-11-2020703": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102923_202005-11-20201159": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103293_202007-12-2020461": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101971_202023-09-20201915": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101594_201905-09-20192164": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101776_201912-09-20192060": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102331_201902-12-2019499": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102785_202029-10-20201369": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100368_202109-02-20211245": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100327_202102-03-20211056": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102168_202024-09-20201902": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101702_202012-08-2020168": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100514_202117-03-2021675": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101663_202014-08-202090": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100281_202128-01-20211625": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101717_202006-07-2020470": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100741_202018-05-20201140": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102929_202003-12-2020542": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100990_202131-03-2021291": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1002571_202005-11-20201162": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102889_202010-11-2020991": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1200061_202028-05-20201426": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100497_202109-02-20211266": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101917_202010-09-20202102": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102229_201919-11-2019771": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102672_202021-10-20201471": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101202_202023-06-2020686": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100085_202017-01-2020900": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101548_202029-06-2020575": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102538_202008-10-20201716": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5000083_201912-12-2019268": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101381_201929-08-20195": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_103193_202024-11-2020714": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101194_202123-04-202112": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101651_201902-09-20192256": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100203_202021-01-2020842": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1002568_202013-10-20201656": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102033_202010-09-20202110": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1200065_202028-05-20201430": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102379_202024-09-20201908": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2900017_202015-05-20201491": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103078_202018-11-2020846": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_103176_202025-11-2020667": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102053_201921-10-20191201": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1200149_202003-09-20204403": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100239_202125-01-20211709": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101756_202006-08-2020267": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103289_202004-12-2020523": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100208_202128-01-20211618": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102651_202020-10-20201520": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1200062_202125-01-20212968": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1203001_202004-06-20201399": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_500104_201927-08-201961": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102428_202022-09-20201964": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_103516_202019-12-2020154": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100228_202023-01-2020766": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100302_202028-02-2020251": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102497_201918-12-201959": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102056_202017-08-202078": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102189_201914-11-2019889": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1200028_202108-01-20213108": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101151_202113-04-2021102": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102791_202002-11-20201247": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500181_201926-09-20191637": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100101_202014-01-2020948": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100136_202118-01-20211875": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102469_202001-10-20201854": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1205914_202006-08-20201263": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100652_202119-03-2021572": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_700006_202014-01-2020951": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1000059_201929-08-201929": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102190_202009-09-20202127": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500240_201928-11-2019560": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101786_201916-09-20191928": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1201156_202018-08-20201231": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1000658_202018-03-202061": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100906_202123-03-2021476": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1206717_202023-09-20204343": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1000619_202029-05-20201056": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_103479_202022-12-202086": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102978_202013-11-2020896": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101822_202007-08-2020241": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100198_202129-01-20211578": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102297_202001-10-20201839": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101396_202023-06-2020699": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102040_201918-10-20191242": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100692_202029-05-20201038": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102774_202020-10-20201523": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5100109_201916-09-20191939": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101059_202127-04-202111": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102022_202018-08-202063": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103539_202027-01-20211687": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1000066_202123-04-20212243": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100216_202022-01-2020798": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100009_202023-01-2020750": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102406_202001-10-20201848": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1207036_202016-05-20201478": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5100101_201919-09-20191822": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102062_202031-08-20202183": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101439_201921-08-2019179": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102251_201918-11-2019811": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101876_201926-09-20191629": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103332_202027-11-2020610": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_103455_202017-12-2020183": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102754_202006-11-20201104": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1207051_202018-05-20201467": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1201013_202027-05-20201442": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101553_201921-08-2019192": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101218_202004-06-2020972": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101791_202007-08-2020240": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101719_201906-09-20192140": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101116_202016-06-2020800": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100796_202011-05-20201197": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100833_202010-09-20202087": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101331_202010-06-2020916": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100794_202020-03-202012": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_103444_202023-12-202029": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100567_202104-03-20211008": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103117_202004-12-2020507": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101538_201922-08-2019144": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_103340_202009-12-2020429": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1000650_202006-03-2020187": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1209021_202006-08-20201273": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101192_202010-06-2020912": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102994_202018-11-2020840": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1205548_202010-09-20204386": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1200356_202120-04-20212257": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103105_202020-11-2020802": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101232_202017-06-2020784": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102354_202018-09-20202003": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100836_202122-03-2021524": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101927_201901-10-20191519": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_50006_202003-01-20201096": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102860_202006-11-20201111": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100910_202027-05-20201086": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101616_202012-08-2020163": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1206718_202023-09-20204344": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102564_202021-10-20201459": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1002685_202008-10-20201726": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100106_202118-01-20211871": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101438_202008-07-2020392": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101120_202113-04-202198": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103124_202012-11-2020932": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100869_202125-03-2021376": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101422_202030-06-2020542": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100160_202030-01-2020624": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_103047_202021-11-2020764": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100217_202125-01-20211707": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1002736_202021-10-20201488": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1201002_202027-05-20201436": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101804_202010-07-2020336": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101585_201926-08-201990": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1209019_202006-08-20201271": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103598_202002-01-20212230": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100269_202129-01-20211586": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101269_202019-06-2020741": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102040_202011-09-20202058": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1001816_201920-09-20191775": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1002617_202013-10-20201659": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101133_202004-06-2020970": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102447_202031-10-20201316": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101436_201920-08-2019216": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_103254_202004-12-2020516": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5000098_201916-12-2019145": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100960_202001-06-20201016": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100186_202127-01-20211667": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1201242_202031-07-20201291": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1200060_202125-01-20212967": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101965_201918-10-20191237": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101432_201920-08-2019215": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101523_201919-08-2019259": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103471_202023-12-202033": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1002740_202021-10-20201489": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101201_202123-04-202115": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101608_201906-09-20192132": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1205907_202006-08-20201255": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101432_202023-06-2020706": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100858_202131-03-2021284": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100132_202127-01-20211662": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100192_202023-01-2020763": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101965_202013-08-2020153": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500198_201923-10-20191152": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100829_202013-05-20201184": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1201243_202031-07-20201292": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5978580_202026-11-20204051": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5000059_201913-11-2019930": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100969_202123-03-2021478": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100291_202030-01-2020637": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100054_202105-01-20212161": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1202820_202030-05-20201416": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103597_202012-01-20211990": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100144_202017-01-2020907": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102342_201903-12-2019466": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_800003_201919-11-2019776": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102081_201923-10-20191144": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1201006_202027-05-20201439": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101825_202030-07-2020306": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100459_202006-03-2020152": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_500196_201918-10-20191251": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101121_202009-07-2020357": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_500085_201908-08-2019363": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101222_202001-07-2020525": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101104_202012-06-2020861": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_600055_201930-08-20192315": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103086_202010-11-20201002": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500152_201917-09-20191898": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102650_202020-10-20201519": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101035_202010-06-2020899": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103361_202014-12-2020248": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_103338_202024-12-202010": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102489_202025-09-20201896": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102548_201916-01-2020927": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_103356_202016-12-2020208": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100987_202123-03-2021481": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1000072_201902-09-20192264": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100390_202104-02-20211396": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1200449_202024-08-20201219": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_500148_201916-09-20191936": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1203266_202002-07-20201317": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103234_202003-12-2020547": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102595_202021-10-20201460": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_103036_202013-11-2020904": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_12079_202013-10-20204271": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100025_202014-01-2020941": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101350_202024-06-2020659": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102468_201912-12-2019256": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102156_202022-09-20201954": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101171_202002-07-2020503": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102183_201921-11-2019693": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1200057_202125-01-20212964": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102895_202002-11-20201259": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_103006_202020-11-2020787": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100725_202109-03-2021862": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100284_202028-01-2020694": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100345_202105-02-20211348": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101725_201919-09-20191805": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100314_202101-02-20211498": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100358_202028-02-2020252": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102003_202019-08-202048": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102359_202003-11-20201212": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100961_202012-06-2020858": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1200273_202024-11-20204067": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100964_202125-03-2021382": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100240_202121-01-20211770": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102224_201902-11-20191011": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100973_202120-04-202129": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103139_202009-12-2020417": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103249_202002-12-2020564": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101626_202006-08-2020261": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101092_202008-06-2020934": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102010_201910-10-20191444": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100009_202105-01-20212155": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101039_202117-04-202164": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102840_202028-10-20201399": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100103_202023-01-2020752": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102966_202017-11-2020867": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101008_202003-06-2020983": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101726_202013-08-2020129": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_700174_201903-01-20201105": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1002750_202016-10-20201569": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1000615_202005-03-2020204": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102041_201918-10-20191243": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102632_202015-10-20201589": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101983_202012-08-2020192": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101918_201901-10-20191517": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103464_202005-01-20212166": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103218_202025-11-2020680": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101416_201907-08-2019374": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102280_202018-09-20201999": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101676_201911-09-20192078": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1200019_202106-01-20213141": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100851_202123-03-2021472": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101907_202013-08-2020149": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100254_202024-01-2020732": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102231_201919-11-2019772": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100819_202124-03-2021432": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100904_202003-06-2020977": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1200476_202021-10-20204240": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102413_202023-09-20201937": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101661_201902-09-20192258": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100464_202013-03-202096": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100176_202104-02-20211380": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101789_202007-08-2020239": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100926_202126-03-2021332": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100022_202106-01-20212110": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5000091_201911-12-2019302": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5000048_201919-09-20191821": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1200319_202102-04-20212297": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102932_202011-11-2020963": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101399_202023-06-2020700": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100848_202125-03-2021373": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102776_202031-10-20201329": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_600107_201931-10-20191048": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101773_202007-08-2020238": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100401_202101-02-20211501": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101234_202117-04-202170": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100245_202103-02-20211430": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1207010_202014-05-20201498": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_500132_201906-09-20192148": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101096_202030-05-20201033": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1002745_202020-10-20201535": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1205545_202010-09-20204383": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_500253_201905-12-2019405": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101985_202019-08-202045": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1000581_202004-03-2020225": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101858_201923-09-20191725": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3500015_202019-06-20201354": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100217_202022-01-2020799": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101836_201923-09-20191717": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102614_202021-10-20201462": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102248_201914-11-2019892": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100729_202124-03-2021422": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101810_201918-09-20191854": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5000046_201903-10-20191504": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101516_201919-08-2019253": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102623_202017-10-20201553": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102341_201910-12-2019317": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100968_202029-06-2020560": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101640_202031-07-2020299": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100687_202013-03-2020100": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_103178_202023-11-2020747": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102428_201912-12-2019248": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102456_202013-10-20201632": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102181_202019-09-20201982": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500089_201919-08-2019260": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_103265_202022-12-202070": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101014_202126-03-2021346": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1200015_202021-08-20201225": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102093_201922-10-20191176": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102537_202021-10-20201458": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100295_202104-02-20211385": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100930_202011-06-2020883": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103084_202012-11-2020931": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100384_202019-03-202025": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_500193_201916-10-20191344": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_103177_202023-11-2020746": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100499_202005-03-2020199": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102454_201913-12-2019226": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101573_201922-08-2019151": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100137_202111-01-20212009": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1202828_202002-06-20201408": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1201249_202008-10-20204297": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100974_202105-04-2021180": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101049_202015-06-2020834": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100491_202026-02-2020285": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1205908_202006-08-20201256": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103545_202007-01-20212085": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100174_202028-01-2020689": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101748_202013-08-2020132": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103137_202024-11-2020705": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101570_201922-08-2019149": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1000060_201920-08-2019232": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100113_202112-01-20211978": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102053_202014-08-2020116": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100993_202125-03-2021384": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100619_202109-03-2021859": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1200305_202131-03-20212313": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101056_202107-04-2021138": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100933_202102-04-2021209": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100874_202125-03-2021377": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102624_202009-11-20201039": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100191_202021-01-2020832": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102541_201910-01-2020993": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101723_202022-09-20201946": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100069_202126-04-202122": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1200124_202002-09-20204412": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_500204_201924-10-20191123": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100091_202115-01-20211927": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101001_202009-06-2020918": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101945_202010-08-2020222": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2900002_202012-05-20201520": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101832_202009-07-2020385": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1002577_202017-10-20201557": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_103255_202009-12-2020421": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6000094_201926-09-20191640": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100251_202007-02-2020446": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1200285_202125-03-20212344": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102573_202011-11-2020951": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102392_201910-12-2019320": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1002693_202020-10-20201529": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100424_202104-02-20211399": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1200066_202028-05-20201431": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101529_202009-07-2020366": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103341_202011-12-2020383": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101267_202128-04-202110": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103470_202023-12-202032": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100344_202003-03-2020231": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3605089_202001-12-20204041": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101911_202012-08-2020183": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101425_201917-08-2019281": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1207021_202015-05-20201482": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100170_202118-01-20211879": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_500168_201920-09-20191773": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101979_201914-10-20191385": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100593_202115-03-2021749": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101392_201906-08-2019401": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100043_202027-01-2020711": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1000638_202006-03-2020186": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103347_202004-12-2020530": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101235_202123-04-202118": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_103488_202003-02-20211449": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500096_201920-08-2019231": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101637_201929-08-201917": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101531_201921-08-2019188": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101617_202010-07-2020327": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102544_202020-10-20201511": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101032_202016-06-2020798": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101577_202010-08-2020202": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1201248_202008-10-20204296": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102888_202007-11-20201077": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101473_202030-06-2020544": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102159_201926-11-2019629": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101949_202012-08-2020190": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100913_202003-06-2020978": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1002570_202015-10-20201595": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100023_202016-01-2020922": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102395_202007-10-20201750": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1200067_202028-05-20201432": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100068_202126-04-202121": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100108_202116-01-20211912": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102060_201919-10-20191218": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101636_202030-07-2020302": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102931_202011-11-2020962": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100862_202021-05-20201110": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100778_202126-03-2021322": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100125_202118-01-20211874": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101441_201926-08-201985": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101788_201916-09-20191929": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1000549_202006-03-2020181": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102384_202022-09-20201963": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102058_202023-09-20201921": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101852_202006-08-2020278": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1207003_202013-05-20201513": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102135_202028-08-20202190": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101991_201911-10-20191408": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100374_202103-03-20211029": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102790_202002-11-20201246": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102300_201907-12-2019369": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_50001_202002-01-20201118": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100708_202017-03-202082": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100450_202026-02-2020279": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_103337_202016-12-2020207": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100423_202026-02-2020274": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102484_202006-10-20201788": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100334_202004-02-2020528": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101256_201908-08-2019345": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500252_201905-12-2019404": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100410_202110-02-20211221": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100508_202002-03-2020243": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102844_202029-10-20201370": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_103260_202010-12-2020399": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1201252_202008-10-20204300": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100265_202004-02-2020521": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_103094_202013-11-2020908": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_500238_201927-11-2019611": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100827_202125-03-2021369": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101968_202013-08-2020154": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102639_202009-11-20201040": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100575_202106-03-2021927": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101812_202011-09-20202049": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102114_201922-10-20191177": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101757_202007-08-2020237": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100297_202002-03-2020240": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101848_202011-09-20202054": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102423_202023-09-20201938": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101866_202010-09-20202098": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102271_202014-09-20202032": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103259_202011-12-2020382": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1203217_202011-09-20204376": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1200361_202121-04-20212248": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101134_202010-06-2020904": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103303_202004-12-2020525": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100106_202029-01-2020655": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102115_201918-11-2019805": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100704_202006-03-2020171": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1200026_202108-01-20213106": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6000090_201924-09-20191689": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5000054_201904-10-20191471": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3605090_202001-12-20204042": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102147_202023-09-20201926": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500175_201924-09-20191682": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101178_202011-06-2020889": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101585_202004-07-2020476": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101503_201916-08-2019309": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101045_202117-04-202167": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100437_202003-03-2020232": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101494_202026-06-2020599": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102898_202009-11-20201052": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3000011_202010-01-20201002": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101189_202002-07-2020504": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103497_202002-01-20212217": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101576_201905-09-20192163": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100843_202018-05-20201143": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102974_202025-11-2020659": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101081_202025-06-2020614": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102781_202015-10-20201593": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100165_202028-01-2020686": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101738_201917-09-20191889": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500185_201927-09-20191597": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100109_202113-01-20211947": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101862_202013-08-2020145": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_103377_202006-01-20212125": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101669_202002-07-2020518": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101009_202131-03-2021292": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102251_202010-09-20202120": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100538_202101-03-20211110": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101242_202126-04-202117": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2900020_202015-05-20201494": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1200005_202105-01-20213169": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101793_202010-08-2020209": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101536_201922-08-2019143": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102403_201910-12-2019324": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6000132_201906-12-2019390": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102171_201930-10-20191074": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101780_202006-08-2020269": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101565_202002-07-2020509": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100083_202108-01-20212046": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101650_202013-08-2020124": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102007_201916-10-20191332": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102000_202013-08-2020156": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1200153_202003-09-20204407": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100812_202027-05-20201081": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103563_202012-01-20211988": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6000124_201920-11-2019737": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102372_202013-10-20201618": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5000169_201923-09-20191728": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500166_201918-09-20191867": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102796_202005-11-20201147": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_103434_202021-12-2020113": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_103599_202006-01-20212145": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101025_202106-04-2021168": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102256_202003-10-20201800": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1200125_202030-06-20201327": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101997_202011-09-20202057": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_120062_202009-07-20201298": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1000646_202017-03-202090": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100067_202010-01-2020984": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3700263_202009-12-20203995": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100951_202029-05-20201045": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101781_201916-09-20191925": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101704_202006-08-2020264": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1200213_202024-11-20204066": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103244_202027-11-2020606": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_700177_201902-01-20201128": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101010_202126-03-2021345": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100811_202012-05-20201190": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101181_202113-04-2021110": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102592_202008-10-20201723": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101340_202017-06-2020792": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100927_202002-06-2020997": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102445_202007-10-20201757": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100260_202101-02-20211495": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102779_202006-11-20201108": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102221_201919-11-2019768": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500259_201911-12-2019299": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101087_202107-04-2021145": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2900052_202005-06-20201392": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101420_201907-08-2019375": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1000621_202029-05-20201059": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101446_201919-08-2019246": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101736_201911-09-20192079": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103495_202023-12-202043": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6000099_201918-10-20191257": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1200358_202120-04-20212258": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101685_201905-09-20192169": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101720_202028-08-20202187": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500233_201925-11-2019667": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_103245_202007-12-2020459": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100622_202104-03-20211015": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103109_202010-11-20201004": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100401_202026-02-2020271": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101383_201906-08-2019396": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102220_201927-11-2019591": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101123_202004-06-2020968": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100148_202118-01-20211878": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101821_202008-09-20202133": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100842_202019-03-202034": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500207_201931-10-20191045": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101306_202129-04-20214": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1000654_202001-06-20201022": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500241_201902-12-2019508": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100928_202001-06-20201012": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101320_201906-08-2019392": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101466_202023-09-20201912": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102486_202001-10-20201857": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100764_202131-03-2021278": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100922_202107-04-2021129": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1002409_202024-09-20201909": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100278_202031-01-2020606": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101479_201916-08-2019306": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100510_202002-03-2020244": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102954_202017-11-2020864": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_103317_202017-12-2020176": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101476_202006-07-2020461": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2900048_202005-06-20201389": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102536_202006-11-20201103": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102848_202005-11-20201151": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100427_202106-03-2021920": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100294_202028-01-2020698": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101254_202024-06-2020651": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1200302_202126-03-20212332": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100850_202125-03-2021375": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100813_202123-03-2021470": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102601_202028-01-20211634": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101490_201919-08-2019247": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101496_201908-08-2019354": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102054_202020-08-202040": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102926_202010-11-2020996": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101370_202026-06-2020593": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1002708_202024-11-2020717": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100821_202117-04-202151": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102166_202004-09-20202157": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1002687_202012-10-20201669": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_200085_201909-08-2019342": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102312_201927-11-2019604": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100075_202119-01-20211827": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100573_202110-03-2021832": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101062_202015-06-2020837": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103199_202020-11-2020813": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_103250_202002-12-2020565": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500191_201914-10-20191392": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101463_202006-07-2020459": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100851_202018-05-20201146": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100412_202106-02-20211317": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100732_202013-03-2020101": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100072_202129-01-20211573": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102430_202013-10-20201627": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101903_201927-09-20191593": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101028_202125-03-2021388": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102083_202021-08-202029": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500174_201924-09-20191681": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101662_201903-09-20192216": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_103130_202024-11-2020704": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102911_202005-11-20201158": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1366_202023-06-2020677": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102562_202015-10-20201580": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2353_202108-04-2021246": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_979_202004-03-2020702": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1586_202112-03-20211852": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1457_202119-03-20211304": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2604_202027-10-20203111": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_321_202014-02-20201619": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6127_201930-11-20191030": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1950_202116-04-2021124": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_287_202001-02-20203868": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_683_202015-02-20201299": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__4370_202019-12-2020253": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3849_201916-07-20192055": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6037_201901-02-20203915": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4167_201921-09-20194641": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2833_201919-06-20193342": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2173_202101-04-2021663": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2574_201914-05-20195122": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1161_202110-03-20211976": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3824_202005-12-2020786": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1494_202116-03-20211668": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4171_201921-08-2019507": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6181_201920-11-20191731": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__3191_202010-12-2020557": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1085_202021-10-20203346": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3669_201903-07-20192860": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6879_201913-01-20204739": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1510_202003-09-20206514": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5617_201921-10-20193016": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_397_202001-02-20203879": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1301_202017-08-2020660": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_705_202006-03-2020436": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5796_201921-10-20193029": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3359_201918-06-20193393": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1727_202020-03-202061": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1613_202031-08-20207031": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_857_202003-03-2020796": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1205_202013-08-2020774": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__3757_202003-12-2020988": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2917_201924-05-20194292": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2630_201914-05-20195135": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1968_202007-09-20206280": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1542_202116-03-20211670": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2740_201917-05-20194886": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2688_201931-05-20193848": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6251_201917-12-2019335": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2776_201920-05-20194657": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6398_201907-12-2019711": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3666_202023-11-20201534": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_699_202031-01-20204013": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_484_202028-02-2020927": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1197_202026-02-20201105": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1152_202104-03-20212388": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6897_201914-02-20201692": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3122_201907-06-20193559": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1111_202105-03-20212295": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_919_202014-02-20201669": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6492_201917-01-20204461": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1742_202006-11-20202412": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2789_201929-05-20194001": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4262_201906-08-20191128": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6057_201913-11-20192158": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3152_202028-10-20202957": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1400_202105-03-20212333": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2711_202015-10-20204251": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2875_201906-08-20191096": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5133_201925-09-20194355": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__548_202122-02-20213040": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5940_201913-11-20192145": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2723_201928-05-20194103": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5725_201915-11-20191939": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__913_202005-11-20202499": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3264_201918-06-20193385": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1844_202118-03-20211470": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1170_202124-02-20212889": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1048_202013-02-20201825": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_922_202014-02-20201671": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2911_202027-10-20203136": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3948_201919-07-20191809": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__3003_202027-10-20203149": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2717_201916-05-20194942": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2385_202010-11-20202158": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6902_201903-01-20205005": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1819_202120-03-20211262": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2990_202022-10-20203297": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_600_202014-02-20201645": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1774_202003-09-20206546": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_7032_201914-01-20204603": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__601_202119-02-20213139": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2278_202107-04-2021303": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1993_202027-10-20203085": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1842_202125-03-2021869": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2974_202027-10-20203145": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1673_202019-03-202077": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__3394_202005-11-20202572": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1733_202021-09-20205756": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__4242_202005-12-2020837": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2106_202101-04-2021649": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__71_202101-03-20212679": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2137_202124-03-2021988": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6059_201913-11-20192159": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1629_202021-09-20205742": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5981_201915-11-20191959": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4476_201921-08-2019544": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3104_201918-06-20193378": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2488_201907-05-20195391": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1728_202120-03-20211258": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5973_201915-11-20191954": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6725_201908-01-20204856": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2588_202015-10-20204224": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1618_202117-03-20211552": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__4562_202024-12-202062": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_543_202014-02-20201635": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2605_202122-04-202136": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3894_201917-07-20192004": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__4374_202021-12-2020235": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3239_201925-06-20193175": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5534_201916-10-20193322": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1420_202005-10-20205039": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2400_202015-10-20204204": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1658_202012-10-20204436": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__626_202101-03-20212687": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__3460_202007-12-2020682": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1299_202123-02-20212992": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__473_202122-02-20213036": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1780_202124-03-2021968": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6845_201908-01-20204868": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__932_202105-03-20212288": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5374_201904-10-20193781": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_535_202003-02-20203811": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5123_201914-10-20193486": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2128_202024-09-20205594": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__780_202125-02-20212777": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6710_201918-12-2019274": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_491_202015-02-20201283": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3039_201904-06-20193632": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3188_201921-06-20193297": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5934_201906-11-20192426": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1392_202002-12-20201032": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2572_202008-10-20204695": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2236_202106-04-2021395": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2423_202116-04-2021159": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6803_201914-01-20204573": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1987_202015-10-20204159": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__828_202125-02-20212779": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__4217_202010-12-2020586": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3193_201922-06-20193240": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1130_202021-09-20205692": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_207_202031-01-20203974": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6655_201920-12-2019170": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3849_202023-11-20201554": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__67_202006-03-2020520": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1347_202112-03-20211829": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4939_201924-09-20194469": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__4051_202002-12-20201099": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2712_201904-06-20193611": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3350_202006-11-20202470": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2249_202011-11-20202044": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3810_202002-12-20201082": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1438_202110-03-20211987": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6869_201924-12-201936": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1406_202008-03-20212117": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6126_201922-11-20191580": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2595_202122-04-202133": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3133_201915-06-20193439": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__679_202123-02-20212940": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_236_202004-02-20203699": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5775_201918-11-20191824": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5555_201918-10-20193189": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2777_201920-05-20194658": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5504_201919-10-20193076": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1436_202012-03-2020220": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1308_202103-03-20212488": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1942_202106-04-2021371": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_412_202029-01-20204117": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3891_201902-08-20191300": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2845_202022-10-20203290": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2421_202012-10-20204462": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6968_201914-01-20204582": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5256_201905-10-20193692": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2428_202116-04-2021160": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6458_201903-01-20204979": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2762_202022-10-20203283": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2523_202022-10-20203272": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__3398_202007-11-20202365": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4994_201918-09-20194882": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1195_202118-03-20211432": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__4003_202002-12-20201098": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2483_202119-04-202184": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5734_201922-11-20191555": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2738_202022-10-20203281": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__4334_202023-12-2020135": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1300_202108-03-20212149": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3332_201929-06-20193034": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5032_201901-10-20193891": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_7013_201929-01-20204142": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2536_202119-04-202196": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6434_201903-01-20204978": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4131_201908-08-2019953": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5727_201924-10-20192834": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2134_202024-09-20205596": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2712_202020-10-20203555": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1775_202021-03-202029": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2905_201911-06-20193490": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5050_201924-09-20194489": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2383_201901-05-20195706": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2276_202106-04-2021400": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2138_202024-09-20205599": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_239_202029-01-20204100": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2590_202015-10-20204225": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1709_202115-03-20211754": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__874_202124-03-2021955": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_988_202014-02-20201679": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1449_202123-03-20211045": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4396_201924-08-2019376": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3435_201915-07-20192121": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1336_202105-03-20212313": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1477_202005-10-20205044": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4864_201916-09-20195035": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2604_202119-04-2021105": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2554_202119-04-202198": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1798_202007-04-2021271": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1314_202104-03-20212399": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5066_201921-09-20194667": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1840_202021-09-20205765": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6342_201903-12-2019899": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1771_202125-03-2021854": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2123_202022-10-20203257": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3507_202024-11-20201422": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__3139_202003-12-2020960": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5280_201901-10-20193909": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2348_202119-04-202159": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1096_202003-09-20206484": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5797_201921-10-20193030": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__4155_202018-12-2020284": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3059_201919-06-20193345": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5566_201915-10-20193437": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1567_202110-03-20212017": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3241_201902-07-20192915": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1904_202024-09-20205547": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2903_201922-05-20194448": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3952_201929-07-20191603": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1619_202123-03-20211047": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2309_202012-10-20204452": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4442_201921-08-2019533": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2176_202102-04-2021586": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3401_202005-11-20202575": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3028_201931-05-20193858": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__3596_202005-12-2020779": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1018_202018-02-20201214": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3430_201929-06-20193037": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6315_201929-11-20191122": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3165_202022-12-2020165": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2464_202119-04-202173": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6466_201903-01-20204980": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1016_202026-02-20201092": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2172_202108-04-2021219": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5883_201915-11-20191947": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1422_202003-03-2020853": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3399_201919-06-20193364": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2737_202005-11-20202515": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1975_202126-04-202110": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2133_202106-04-2021384": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_7095_201917-01-20204484": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1037_202010-08-2020807": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1277_202106-03-20212218": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4021_201921-08-2019504": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6067_201917-12-2019327": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__3650_202018-11-20201816": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2304_202106-04-2021404": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1066_202003-03-2020813": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3146_201917-06-20193417": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1405_202019-02-20213127": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__124_202003-03-2020882": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6480_201931-01-20204018": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_7014_201914-01-20204602": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2171_202021-09-20205816": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1705_202007-09-20206253": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3206_201918-06-20193383": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5230_201925-09-20194374": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5293_201930-10-20192711": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_92_202013-01-20204688": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2136_202107-04-2021286": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_578_202006-03-2020433": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3105_202027-10-20203166": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2077_202102-04-2021583": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1258_202105-03-20212302": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1139_202004-03-2020717": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1424_202021-10-20203339": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3029_201931-05-20193859": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__3270_202018-11-20201796": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_186_202029-01-20204096": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1485_202021-09-20205723": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3562_202023-02-20212993": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2127_202106-04-2021381": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6720_201902-01-20205063": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1211_202017-08-2020654": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2202_202005-10-20205111": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3087_201907-06-20193549": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2004_202020-10-20203504": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1144_202105-03-20212296": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__4215_202004-12-2020923": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__650_202119-02-20213143": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1390_202024-08-2020251": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3443_201901-07-20192983": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_110_202008-01-20204830": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_951_202006-03-2020440": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1864_201902-07-20192900": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6930_201902-01-20205098": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2222_201922-05-20194401": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_481_202031-01-20204003": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6835_201908-01-20204866": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2146_202021-09-20205811": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5296_201901-10-20193910": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_7025_201913-01-20204754": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__4327_202005-03-20212344": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2770_202020-10-20203561": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2266_202024-09-20205628": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2042_202021-09-20205800": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2440_202002-12-20201044": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6822_201913-01-20204734": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1746_202013-03-2020171": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1364_202021-09-20205709": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1127_202108-03-20212141": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2563_201915-05-20195042": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2169_202020-10-20203515": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2969_202021-10-20203435": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1490_202027-10-20203080": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__3859_202003-12-20201001": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5265_201901-10-20193907": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_506_202028-02-2020933": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6881_201924-12-201945": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1916_202015-10-20204155": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5756_201913-11-20192139": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2118_202024-09-20205590": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_653_202015-02-20201297": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5096_201901-10-20193895": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2263_202021-09-20205833": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1623_202018-03-2020110": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4362_201914-08-2019866": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2867_202004-11-20202653": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_834_202012-02-20201877": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3137_202004-11-20202673": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3832_201911-07-20192518": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5783_201906-11-20192413": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_263_202027-01-20204232": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3328_201919-06-20193359": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3198_202023-11-20201510": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_7054_201913-01-20204757": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__605_202020-08-2020375": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4792_201905-11-20192485": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_632_201920-05-20194627": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__171_202104-03-20212377": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1730_202119-03-20211332": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1199_202026-02-20201107": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1964_202108-04-2021206": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_360_202003-02-20203801": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1659_202116-03-20211682": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3292_201911-07-20192475": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_7100_201913-01-20204761": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3412_201919-06-20193366": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6276_201927-11-20191313": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1846_202010-09-20205997": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3667_201911-07-20192491": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2848_202021-10-20203421": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2553_202021-10-20203387": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2260_202107-04-2021300": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3807_202002-12-20201081": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2140_202125-03-2021893": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3884_202024-11-20201458": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3788_202023-11-20201544": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1487_202031-08-20207012": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5984_201915-11-20191961": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3620_202010-12-2020564": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6666_201902-01-20205060": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6292_201927-11-20191317": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2595_202013-11-20201932": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1392_202024-09-20205515": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_841_202012-02-20201882": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2049_202105-04-2021498": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6933_201926-02-20201118": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1467_202013-03-2020165": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1607_202028-09-20205438": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1467_202027-10-20203079": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2590_201914-05-20195124": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2401_202012-10-20204459": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5819_201905-11-20192521": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1100_202007-09-20206160": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5450_201905-10-20193706": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1912_202122-03-20211209": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3273_202006-11-20202459": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1444_202010-11-20202150": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6438_201924-12-20197": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2349_202107-04-2021308": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3355_202011-11-20202070": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1151_202004-03-2020719": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3613_201904-07-20192771": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5913_201918-11-20191833": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6852_201924-12-201931": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4461_201921-08-2019542": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1681_202019-03-202082": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2422_202006-11-20202419": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1232_202104-03-20212395": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3144_201919-06-20193348": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6683_201923-12-201978": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6430_201903-12-2019905": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2441_201908-05-20195307": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__3972_202027-11-20201275": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6844_201903-01-20205000": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1800_202125-03-2021858": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5700_201918-11-20191813": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6428_201903-12-2019903": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1566_202010-03-20211949": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6089_201923-11-20191469": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3840_202023-11-20201551": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1847_202118-03-20211471": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6373_201923-11-20191481": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6408_201903-01-20204975": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_331_202004-02-20203704": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2776_202020-10-20203563": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2148_202107-04-2021290": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1338_202106-03-20212225": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__4393_202018-12-2020305": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6120_201923-12-201965": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2211_202008-10-20204674": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5679_201920-11-20191713": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1446_202102-04-2021562": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6103_201920-11-20191728": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__3768_202027-11-20201252": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1066_202104-03-20212382": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_804_202005-03-2020583": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__990_202124-02-20212868": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2116_202024-09-20205588": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_886_202013-02-20201812": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5851_201906-11-20192418": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4023_201920-08-2019633": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4907_201930-09-20193989": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5329_201904-10-20193774": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2616_201914-05-20195131": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1120_202124-02-20212884": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1566_202119-03-20211313": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__4485_202022-12-2020198": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_7003_201914-01-20204597": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2639_202005-10-20205181": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1484_202110-03-20211994": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2799_201903-07-20192820": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1696_202118-03-20211458": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5736_201905-11-20192506": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5080_201926-09-20194165": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_916_202003-03-2020798": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1336_202007-03-2020293": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4636_201928-08-2019176": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2715_202012-10-20204485": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1158_202024-08-2020235": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__4066_202002-12-20201103": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_420_202028-02-2020925": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1168_202006-03-2020467": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__673_202020-08-2020378": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__905_202125-02-20212781": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__4127_202011-12-2020515": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_7114_201927-01-20204266": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3099_202023-11-20201509": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1286_202004-03-2020727": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1851_202007-09-20206275": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3720_201911-07-20192498": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__4017_202003-12-20201011": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3353_201920-06-20193337": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1491_202007-09-20206217": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1606_202110-03-20212019": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1674_202019-03-202078": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2718_202004-11-20202645": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1454_202118-03-20211440": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3275_202004-11-20202686": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1550_202005-10-20205046": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3060_201907-06-20193546": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6346_201923-11-20191480": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1818_202031-08-20207053": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2927_201928-05-20194127": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2573_201914-05-20195121": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5438_201924-10-20192803": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2085_202021-10-20203359": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2334_202005-10-20205132": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5068_201918-09-20194891": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3246_201911-06-20193508": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_480_202031-01-20204002": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3255_201915-07-20192118": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__3376_202005-11-20202562": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_219_202031-01-20203977": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3129_201915-07-20192117": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6129_201903-12-2019890": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5261_201915-10-20193401": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2264_202005-10-20205122": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1616_202007-03-2020322": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2886_202004-11-20202656": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__825_202119-02-20213156": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1083_202101-03-20212702": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5167_201930-09-20194008": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2414_202015-10-20204207": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6396_201917-12-2019351": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3417_201919-06-20193367": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3981_201914-08-2019837": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2700_201928-05-20194098": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_521_202013-02-20201765": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2169_201901-05-20195682": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1051_202123-02-20212975": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2656_201928-06-20193078": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5333_201906-11-20192397": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5845_201906-11-20192417": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5472_201907-11-20192319": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6339_201924-12-20195": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__3582_202011-11-20202085": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1861_202119-03-20211341": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2000_202105-04-2021486": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2279_202106-04-2021402": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3618_202018-11-20201814": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_797_202004-02-20203742": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_649_202003-03-2020790": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__4043_202027-11-20201292": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6696_201917-01-20204469": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_920_202014-02-20201670": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_16_202014-01-20204552": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1372_202105-03-20212326": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2081_202011-11-20202042": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1133_202006-03-2020453": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__171_202023-02-20212931": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3203_201902-07-20192912": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3499_201928-06-20193112": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1877_202019-03-202089": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1192_202103-03-20212473": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2402_202116-04-2021152": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6967_201914-01-20204581": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1652_202116-03-20211681": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1812_202010-09-20205994": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5437_201924-10-20192802": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2846_201904-06-20193614": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1227_202124-02-20212896": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2079_202105-04-2021507": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1910_202123-03-20211074": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__810_202115-03-20211725": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1070_202014-02-20201684": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5790_201918-11-20191827": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_821_202013-02-20201798": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1250_202028-02-20201003": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2998_202018-11-20201793": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2102_201904-05-20195460": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5266_201926-09-20194194": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5012_201924-09-20194484": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2527_201901-06-20193742": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1492_202017-08-2020671": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__215_202018-03-2020124": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1670_202012-10-20204437": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__4270_202022-12-2020183": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2156_201920-05-20194628": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1188_202103-03-20212471": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2572_201931-05-20193847": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5399_201901-10-20193929": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1233_202006-03-2020473": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2941_201929-05-20194019": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1516_202120-03-20211250": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2201_202005-10-20205110": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3521_202022-12-2020168": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2271_202107-04-2021301": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4242_201916-08-2019772": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1453_202110-03-20211990": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6252_201917-12-2019336": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4436_201920-08-2019656": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6076_201908-11-20192274": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6966_201914-01-20204580": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2472_202021-10-20203377": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_343_202003-02-20203797": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2775_202015-10-20204270": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2543_202008-10-20204690": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5241_201901-10-20193906": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2083_202105-04-2021508": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_495_202028-02-2020932": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3387_201921-06-20193316": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1767_202117-03-20211558": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2268_202102-04-2021596": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3879_201918-07-20191910": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2444_201902-05-20195611": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2408_202116-04-2021153": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1283_202105-03-20212307": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2146_202101-04-2021656": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6301_201929-11-20191116": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3805_202007-12-2020691": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6439_201930-11-20191053": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1466_202020-10-20203496": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6390_201912-12-2019603": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3889_201914-08-2019834": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5551_201919-10-20193080": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__52_202122-03-20211172": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2841_202020-10-20203572": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1124_202026-02-20201100": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2492_202119-04-202190": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2809_201922-05-20194430": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_7064_201913-01-20204760": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6816_201913-01-20204732": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3338_202006-11-20202466": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4370_201924-08-2019371": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2698_201917-05-20194880": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3981_202002-12-20201095": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2221_202011-11-20202043": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__3741_202005-12-2020784": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4103_201906-08-20191123": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4942_201905-10-20193684": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5081_201905-10-20193686": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6817_201917-01-20204476": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6366_201917-12-2019346": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6104_201922-11-20191578": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1119_202101-03-20212704": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__907_202122-04-20212": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_547_202005-03-2020571": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2818_202022-10-20203286": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_927_202014-02-20201674": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6087_201904-12-2019797": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2664_201920-05-20194646": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_817_202005-03-2020586": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3211_201911-06-20193502": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3581_202021-11-20201599": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2900_201903-06-20193683": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3384_201903-07-20192834": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5467_201918-10-20193176": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1975_202007-09-20206282": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3782_201915-07-20192149": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5045_201926-09-20194159": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3798_201924-07-20191687": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1755_202021-03-202018": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2084_202101-04-2021645": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__4572_202023-12-2020151": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1494_202010-09-20205965": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5406_201915-10-20193411": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1639_202007-09-20206238": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3395_202005-12-2020774": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__4162_202004-12-2020915": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6578_201904-02-20203748": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1091_202003-03-2020816": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2943_202023-11-20201504": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6920_201902-01-20205092": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_384_202003-02-20203805": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__4479_202023-12-2020144": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3067_201911-06-20193494": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3782_202003-12-2020993": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__995_202122-02-20213087": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4090_201902-08-20191319": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2838_201901-06-20193755": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__666_202024-09-20205500": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5400_201905-10-20193699": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2921_201903-06-20193684": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4161_201908-08-2019960": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_520_202001-02-20203893": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4261_201914-08-2019859": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3946_202024-12-202019": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1813_202120-03-20211260": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1018_202123-02-20212965": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6071_201914-11-20192033": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_878_202013-02-20201808": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5063_201926-09-20194163": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5351_201927-09-20194094": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2362_202001-10-20205222": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1136_202122-02-20213110": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3006_202024-12-202013": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4799_201918-09-20194854": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3218_202010-11-20202180": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3123_201904-06-20193644": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2113_202106-04-2021377": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2633_202016-10-20204073": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6658_201920-12-2019172": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3373_201918-06-20193395": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1689_202007-09-20206250": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2378_202024-09-20205643": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1557_202125-03-2021848": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3305_201928-06-20193087": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3639_201917-07-20191967": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6425_201915-02-20201330": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1807_202002-12-20201042": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2237_202107-04-2021296": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3803_202027-11-20201262": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__3445_202025-11-20201361": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_180_202017-01-20204441": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_659_202028-02-2020946": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2423_201907-05-20195381": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1145_202004-03-2020718": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_7090_201927-01-20204263": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_837_202015-02-20201311": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1274_202007-09-20206176": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2866_201928-05-20194118": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5391_201905-10-20193698": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5622_201918-10-20193207": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6178_201913-02-20201829": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1703_202020-03-202049": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6778_201931-01-20204023": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3298_201904-07-20192749": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1540_202005-03-2020627": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1578_202116-03-20211673": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3023_201903-06-20193703": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3329_201919-06-20193360": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4534_201920-08-2019664": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2347_202009-12-2020619": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__4129_202003-12-20201018": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__474_202125-03-2021846": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__4012_202027-11-20201280": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__196_202101-03-20212682": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1508_202020-03-202041": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1493_202116-03-20211667": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1860_202024-09-20205542": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1230_202112-03-20211825": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2372_201915-05-20195023": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3670_201911-07-20192493": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3586_201903-07-20192855": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4188_201908-08-2019965": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6324_201922-11-20191584": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3299_201915-06-20193445": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2058_202105-04-2021499": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3563_201918-07-20191871": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1847_202007-09-20206273": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2288_202005-11-20202504": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_672_202003-02-20203817": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5983_201923-11-20191461": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__656_202122-02-20213049": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_438_202015-02-20201278": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3947_201919-07-20191808": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2496_202005-10-20205168": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1503_202027-10-20203082": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__3336_202018-12-2020268": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1801_202125-03-2021859": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6401_201908-01-20204839": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2165_202010-11-20202153": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_594_202004-02-20203725": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_676_202004-02-20203728": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3219_201919-06-20193351": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1769_202122-03-20211195": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6406_201918-12-2019248": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2305_201901-06-20193737": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3689_201906-07-20192665": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3257_202003-12-2020967": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1242_202101-03-20212715": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1423_202110-03-20211986": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2164_202010-11-20202152": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2418_202108-04-2021249": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3231_202027-11-20201233": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3892_202026-11-20201336": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1302_202003-09-20206494": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1822_201903-06-20193669": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1766_202021-03-202024": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5328_201901-10-20193917": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3303_201922-06-20193251": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_845_202012-02-20201886": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1754_202003-09-20206538": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5564_201921-10-20193014": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_765_202003-02-20203820": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2557_202028-10-20202925": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__153_202001-03-20212681": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1634_202119-03-20211318": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1310_202110-03-20211983": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2557_201904-05-20195492": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2627_201915-05-20195061": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4358_201926-08-2019293": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2624_202020-11-20201639": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6767_201902-01-20205069": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1579_202021-09-20205738": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__225_202023-02-20212932": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1428_202003-03-2020855": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6130_201922-11-20191581": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1377_202021-09-20205710": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2710_202006-11-20202426": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__821_202101-03-20212692": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4184_201907-08-20191050": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2844_202022-10-20203289": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6776_201912-12-2019630": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1249_202125-02-20212815": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1135_202006-03-2020455": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1690_202021-10-20203349": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__3778_202027-11-20201254": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4107_201916-08-2019762": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2545_202027-10-20203107": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__4458_202024-12-202047": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2193_201915-05-20195020": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1684_202019-03-202085": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1764_202123-03-20211057": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6671_201906-03-2020507": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2001_202008-10-20204663": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2655_201925-05-20194215": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_130_202008-01-20204833": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_818_202014-02-20201662": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3318_201929-06-20193033": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1762_202003-09-20206541": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2797_201925-05-20194226": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6249_201917-12-2019334": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1296_202103-03-20212483": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_935_202015-02-20201320": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1101_202122-02-20213095": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5998_201923-11-20191462": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5816_201930-10-20192732": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5231_201901-10-20193905": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2075_202010-09-20206022": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1272_202003-03-2020834": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1767_202021-03-202025": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__4535_202022-12-2020203": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__955_202122-02-20213082": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1898_202022-10-20203252": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2944_202021-10-20203430": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6864_201902-01-20205083": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3397_202011-11-20202073": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1553_202024-08-2020266": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1387_202116-03-20211661": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1382_202105-03-20212327": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2964_201901-06-20193768": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_854_202028-02-2020957": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3118_201917-06-20193413": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3820_201911-07-20192517": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__3009_202005-11-20202533": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1330_202115-03-20211729": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4502_201916-09-20195015": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3438_202003-12-2020972": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5412_201930-09-20194029": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_704_202014-02-20201653": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_485_202031-01-20204005": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1278_202022-02-20213114": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6848_201924-12-201927": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2961_201903-06-20193690": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_582_202004-02-20203722": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1843_202118-03-20211469": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1959_202126-03-2021733": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2713_201916-05-20194941": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1932_202022-02-20213011": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5103_201926-09-20194167": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5216_201901-10-20193903": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1782_202124-03-2021969": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6789_201913-01-20204731": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3321_202006-11-20202461": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5397_201904-10-20193784": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3333_201906-07-20192640": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__532_202101-03-20212685": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1976_202015-10-20204158": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3317_201924-08-2019352": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2294_202116-04-2021139": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3100_201907-06-20193552": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5752_201922-11-20191560": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4912_201916-09-20195050": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3515_202023-11-20201526": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_703_202017-02-20201241": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2177_202021-09-20205820": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_905_202005-03-2020587": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2247_202001-10-20205219": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_842_202012-02-20201883": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__3447_202007-11-20202375": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1442_202024-08-2020255": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__845_202020-08-2020388": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_67_202013-01-20204683": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3119_201904-06-20193643": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1150_202120-03-20211244": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1109_202124-02-20212883": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2174_202021-09-20205818": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1082_202123-02-20212980": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2294_202021-09-20205835": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2778_201920-05-20194659": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6547_201912-12-2019608": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2381_201917-05-20194848": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1000_202101-03-20212695": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6651_201920-12-2019166": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2604_201907-06-20193532": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1827_202125-03-2021867": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4891_201924-09-20194467": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2360_202105-04-2021540": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__3432_202023-11-20201523": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2682_201921-05-20194517": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6221_201917-12-2019328": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2018_202021-09-20205795": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1203_202010-08-2020823": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1700_202020-03-202046": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2520_202126-04-202122": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6693_201929-01-20204137": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2762_201922-05-20194423": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__3194_202011-12-2020490": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1529_202119-03-20211308": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__725_202122-02-20213057": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1726_202120-03-20211257": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2650_202020-10-20203547": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__3890_202004-12-2020891": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_17_202013-01-20204673": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2703_201925-05-20194219": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1393_202103-03-20212501": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6855_201908-01-20204869": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2503_202005-10-20205171": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2483_202005-10-20205163": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__228_202116-03-20211655": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1607_202018-03-20211416": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2229_202005-10-20205113": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__3036_202023-12-2020110": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1190_202004-03-2020722": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1911_202124-03-2021979": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1319_202007-09-20206184": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5525_201907-11-20192320": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2573_202016-10-20204067": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3354_202011-11-20202069": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1144_202003-09-20206486": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3372_201903-07-20192833": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2047_202024-09-20205569": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5132_201920-09-20194726": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__3816_202010-12-2020569": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__4449_202018-12-2020323": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2176_202005-10-20205106": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2452_202015-10-20204209": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2069_202020-10-20203509": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6452_201902-01-20205058": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_822_202013-02-20201799": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2803_201925-05-20194227": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1231_202105-03-20212300": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6367_201923-12-201968": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2410_201901-06-20193740": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1169_202123-02-20212982": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2219_202005-10-20205112": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5852_201906-11-20192419": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1643_202028-09-20205439": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6161_201903-12-2019896": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5991_201906-11-20192433": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3398_201922-06-20193260": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2200_202126-04-202112": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6201_201929-11-20191109": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1019_202021-09-20205686": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2524_201931-05-20193846": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__3703_202005-12-2020783": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2640_202005-10-20205182": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3074_202007-11-20202351": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2714_202005-11-20202514": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_133_202008-01-20204834": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3476_201901-07-20192991": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5229_201925-09-20194372": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2076_201925-05-20194206": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1153_202110-03-20211975": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3822_202011-12-2020501": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5980_201904-12-2019794": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1656_202012-03-2020225": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3169_201918-06-20193380": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1692_202117-03-20211556": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1349_202104-03-20212404": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__4238_202018-12-2020289": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6242_201917-12-2019329": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6123_201903-12-2019889": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1775_202031-08-20207045": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3876_202027-11-20201268": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6392_201918-12-2019247": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5383_201901-10-20193927": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_860_202013-02-20201803": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5970_201915-11-20191953": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6359_201916-12-2019414": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3215_202024-11-20201408": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1556_202003-09-20206519": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5842_201907-11-20192327": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2954_202004-11-20202659": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1469_202110-03-20211992": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__799_202118-03-20211422": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3269_201914-06-20193479": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2526_201925-05-20194210": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3691_202005-12-2020782": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5317_201918-10-20193160": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3327_201919-07-20191805": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_7076_201913-02-20201834": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5656_201913-11-20192125": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1367_202005-10-20205036": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_701_202028-02-2020951": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4204_201914-08-2019855": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1344_202105-03-20212318": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3431_202004-12-2020877": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_944_202028-02-2020963": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2916_202005-11-20202525": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__4574_202024-12-202064": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3396_201903-07-20192837": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6192_201921-11-20191638": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2814_202020-10-20203567": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_782_202004-03-2020686": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2070_202005-10-20205092": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1589_202122-03-20211185": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__980_202017-09-20205883": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6950_201917-01-20204480": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5820_201914-11-20192019": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5544_201914-11-20192014": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2755_201929-05-20193999": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2697_202002-12-20201046": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1315_202005-03-2020612": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2909_201925-05-20194250": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1032_202123-02-20212969": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1724_202116-04-2021119": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1392_202110-03-20211985": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__4075_202004-12-2020901": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3551_202017-11-20201870": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2774_201921-05-20194528": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_7002_201914-01-20204596": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1357_202006-03-2020485": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5147_201925-09-20194359": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3433_201928-06-20193097": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4584_201904-10-20193762": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5483_201905-11-20192497": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4156_201902-08-20191329": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_139_202028-02-2020919": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1671_202031-08-20207036": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1158_202120-03-20211245": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2454_202005-10-20205154": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__4096_202005-12-2020817": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3929_202004-12-2020892": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_253_202015-02-20201272": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2526_202012-10-20204473": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3565_201902-07-20192943": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4233_201908-08-2019980": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__199_202006-03-2020530": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6260_201927-11-20191306": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2144_201917-05-20194839": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3690_202010-12-2020565": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6795_201916-12-2019420": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3481_201922-06-20193269": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1039_202010-08-2020810": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3465_201928-06-20193104": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_7010_201913-01-20204752": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5253_201915-10-20193399": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2593_201917-05-20194866": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3312_201921-06-20193305": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__887_202106-03-20212205": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4104_201914-08-2019843": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2482_202119-04-202183": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3564_202023-11-20201529": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_91_202013-01-20204687": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3826_202011-12-2020502": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2718_202122-04-202146": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2419_201920-05-20194634": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2375_202010-11-20202157": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1113_202004-03-2020716": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3107_202006-11-20202442": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5626_201906-11-20192406": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1628_202124-03-2021961": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2477_202119-04-202179": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2985_202027-10-20203146": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_753_202001-02-20203908": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2644_202021-10-20203394": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3714_202003-12-2020983": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1087_202024-09-20205507": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1132_202007-09-20206163": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2056_202125-03-2021884": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3797_202027-11-20201260": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4433_201916-08-2019802": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2060_202024-09-20205572": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6238_201912-12-2019597": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3769_201917-07-20191979": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1293_202106-03-20212221": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5252_201924-09-20194519": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__656_202013-08-2020753": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1956_202010-09-20206004": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6326_201923-11-20191479": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5453_201905-10-20193709": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4226_201924-08-2019362": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1175_202104-03-20212391": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__841_202123-02-20212948": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_179_202017-01-20204440": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1319_201903-06-20193667": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3777_202003-12-2020992": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1613_202110-03-20212021": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5203_201924-09-20194511": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3501_202011-11-20202080": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3447_201901-07-20192986": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2038_202024-09-20205567": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4077_201903-08-20191237": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_429_202031-01-20203991": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6672_201909-01-20204807": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3707_201904-07-20192787": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2677_201918-05-20194731": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5927_201914-11-20192025": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_460_202031-01-20203993": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1624_202018-03-2020111": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2040_202024-09-20205568": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__3837_202024-11-20201455": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1789_202124-03-2021972": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1470_202118-03-20211442": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3458_202007-11-20202376": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3781_201915-07-20192148": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__992_202103-03-20212465": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4134_201901-08-20191430": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2311_202114-04-2021182": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3488_201915-10-20193390": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6088_201923-11-20191468": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4995_201918-09-20194883": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2979_201903-06-20193695": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1025_202007-12-2020675": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5536_201915-10-20193432": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1657_202102-04-2021565": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_19_202003-01-20204970": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2104_202106-04-2021376": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__971_202104-03-20212380": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__3785_202027-11-20201258": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2254_201920-05-20194630": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1305_202020-08-2020455": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2716_201929-05-20193994": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5392_201919-10-20193064": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_619_202013-02-20201783": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1591_202010-09-20205972": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6412_201913-01-20204706": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5960_201905-11-20192537": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3964_201923-07-20191740": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1977_202010-09-20206012": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2275_202005-10-20205124": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2014_202024-09-20205562": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3605_201906-07-20192649": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3232_201904-07-20192746": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2449_202015-10-20204208": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_7119_201908-01-20204894": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1899_202005-11-20202502": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__4567_202024-12-202063": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_1408_202004-03-20212361": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1905_202006-11-20202415": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4044_201926-07-20191654": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4325_201908-08-2019988": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1455_202116-03-20211665": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3591_201928-06-20193126": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1859_202005-10-20205071": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1675_202024-09-20205529": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__3754_202026-11-20201334": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2810_201922-05-20194431": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1376_202012-10-20204430": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3403_202023-11-20201522": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2621_202012-10-20204481": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2638_202015-10-20204235": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_6154_201928-11-20191213": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3767_201915-07-20192144": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2608_202021-10-20203393": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1361_202120-03-20211247": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4663_201928-08-2019182": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2315_202028-10-20202920": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_56_202029-01-20204086": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1817_202010-09-20205995": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2787_202022-10-20203284": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2763_202028-10-20202930": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2384_202005-10-20205138": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2012_202007-09-20206284": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__173_202124-02-20212845": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1512_202108-03-20212169": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1370_202010-09-20205951": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5143_201924-09-20194498": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_828_202013-02-20201800": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_7029_201913-01-20204755": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2464_202020-10-20203527": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1511_202115-03-20211734": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1706_202021-09-20205751": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__503_202020-10-20203490": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5116_201905-10-20193688": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2780_201920-05-20194661": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_5471_201919-10-20193067": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3405_201901-07-20192981": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1573_202024-08-2020269": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_461_201920-09-2019439": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000058_201928-05-2019371": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_124_202122-01-2021440": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000112_201922-06-2019305": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000158_201920-07-2019219": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_658_201927-11-2019131": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_431_201904-01-2020276": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_250_202119-02-2021266": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_200_202104-02-2021380": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_672_201920-11-2019166": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_384_202105-04-202151": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_323_201924-05-2019379": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_436_202108-04-202131": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_618_202010-12-202094": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000332_201918-01-2020216": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3000044_201916-05-2019422": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_516_202010-12-202090": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_147_202017-06-2020125": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7000111_202008-12-2020388": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000056_201928-05-2019369": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7000115_202009-12-2020387": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_340_201909-05-2019436": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_307_201902-05-2019465": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_244_202027-11-2020402": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_372_202124-03-202190": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_309_202105-04-2021647": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_412_202106-04-202147": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_603_201929-10-2019261": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000053_201920-05-2019411": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_358_202027-08-2020375": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_670_201921-11-2019157": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_595_201904-12-2019108": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_506_202008-12-2020113": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_466_202019-09-2020264": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_430_202008-10-2020198": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_202_202104-02-2021382": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_38_202122-01-2021434": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_205_202109-02-2021342": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_492_201924-09-2019413": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_325_202006-08-202033": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_599_202009-12-2020104": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_55_202118-01-2021489": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_326_202012-08-202029": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_724_201930-11-2019120": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000350_201920-01-2020209": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_676_202006-01-2021576": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000065_201922-05-2019399": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_52_202014-02-2020124": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_357_202122-03-2021106": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000181_201924-07-2019195": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_556_202002-12-2020159": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_18_202014-01-2020226": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_741_201918-12-201933": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6_202102-01-2021598": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_183_202130-01-2021414": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_277_202123-02-2021246": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_329_201908-05-2019440": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3000351_201918-12-201934": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_570_201922-01-2020197": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000172_201925-07-2019188": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_704_202006-01-2021577": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_133_202121-01-2021449": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000331_201906-01-2020269": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_677_202019-12-202034": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_744_201911-12-201973": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_739_201908-01-2020255": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000267_201908-08-201990": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_14_202107-01-2021563": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_526_202008-10-2020207": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_64_202120-01-2021461": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_111_202111-02-2021312": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000294_201917-08-201961": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000334_201910-12-201980": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_309_202124-02-2021237": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_13_202008-01-2020253": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_445_202013-01-2021534": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_521_202008-12-2020114": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_542_202001-12-2020171": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_326_202102-03-2021208": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000258_201917-08-201957": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_64_202020-02-202094": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_223_202108-02-2021357": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_11_202019-02-202099": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_327_202109-03-2021152": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000173_201925-07-2019189": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_564_202004-12-2020142": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_275_202124-02-2021235": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_232_202110-02-2021333": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_17_202120-01-2021455": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_673_201907-12-201993": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_723_201907-12-201995": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_19_202013-01-2020236": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_30_202017-01-2020220": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000084_201925-06-2019297": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_727_201904-12-2019115": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102_202118-01-2021494": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_283_202102-04-2021659": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000321_201903-09-2019501": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_539_201916-10-2019303": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_598_201922-10-2019285": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_50_202015-02-2020119": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_136_202021-03-20206": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_623_202011-12-202082": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_69_202115-01-2021517": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_577_201908-12-2020109": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_488_201928-09-2019369": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000374_201906-01-2020273": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000211_201926-07-2019181": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_76_202121-01-2021445": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_60_202029-02-202066": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_157_202109-02-2021341": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_700_202004-01-2021593": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3000341_201906-01-2020271": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7000150_202018-12-2020379": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_44_202015-02-2020116": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4_202012-02-2020130": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_116_202013-07-202056": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000067_202008-10-2020412": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_99_202110-02-2021328": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_240_202117-02-2021288": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_177_202130-01-2021413": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_347_202117-03-2021130": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_300_201929-05-2019362": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3000136_201901-07-2019283": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3000088_201907-06-2019329": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_207_202011-06-2020137": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_660_201920-12-201910": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_459_201924-09-2019407": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_248_202118-02-2021278": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_363_202028-08-2020371": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_20_202012-02-2020131": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_619_202010-12-202095": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000048_201928-05-2019368": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_695_201922-11-2019151": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_508_201917-10-2019298": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_413_202107-04-202144": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_56_202110-02-2021327": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3000111_201915-06-2019320": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000060_202014-09-2020495": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_337_201922-05-2019395": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_277_202006-07-202081": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_616_201931-10-2019252": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_78_202029-02-202067": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_552_201902-09-2020350": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_340_202116-03-2021136": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_284_202002-07-2020101": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_644_201914-11-2019193": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000352_201911-09-2020295": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_708_201930-11-2019119": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_224_202108-02-2021358": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_576_201922-01-2020198": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_469_202003-12-2020152": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000146_201903-07-2019275": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3000333_201921-12-20195": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_434_201926-08-20202": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_531_202004-12-2020140": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_393_202027-11-2020173": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_521_201904-10-2019354": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_541_201909-10-2019336": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_318_202119-03-2021115": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_624_201907-11-2019223": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_98_202005-03-202053": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_391_202120-03-2021113": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_675_201916-11-2019176": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_120_202120-01-2021467": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1095_202027-11-2020194": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_320_202029-01-2021897": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_844_202012-10-2020512": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_521_202123-03-2021207": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_588_202022-07-2020224": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_212_202005-03-202074": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_860_202008-10-2020534": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_306_202120-02-2021580": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_435_202124-03-2021181": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_772_202016-10-2020858": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_441_202117-03-2021286": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_217_202013-05-2020868": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_565_202023-07-2020206": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1013_202010-11-2020349": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102_202028-01-2020558": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_505_202126-03-2021156": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_941_201911-07-2019690": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1071_202024-11-2020224": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1421_201907-11-2019443": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_458_202020-06-2020394": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_201_202110-02-20211550": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_796_201914-06-2019911": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1042_202023-11-2020240": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_427_202125-03-20211284": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_297_202007-01-20211126": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_740_202008-09-2020635": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_319_202021-01-2021984": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1120_201907-08-2019168": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_430_202117-03-2021282": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_433_202115-03-2021333": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1105_202002-12-2020166": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_754_202013-10-2020876": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_578_202107-04-202161": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1750_201910-12-2019147": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1782_201910-12-2019150": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_72_202018-01-2020651": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_170_202006-03-202051": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_356_202020-05-2020523": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1686_201913-12-2019112": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1007_202021-12-2020708": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_657_202018-08-202083": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_653_202014-09-2020956": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_956_202002-11-2020411": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1778_201909-12-2019176": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1573_201918-11-2019374": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_307_202122-02-2021567": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_290_202018-03-202011": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1615_201919-12-201928": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_236_202117-02-2021634": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1007_202018-11-2020298": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_273_202119-02-2021600": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_208_202112-02-2021665": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1510_201905-11-2019471": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_532_202124-03-2021191": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_313_202103-03-2021416": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1796_201924-12-20194": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_224_202112-02-2021667": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1137_202015-12-202061": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_412_202029-05-2020479": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_550_202105-04-202190": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_111_202122-01-20211649": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_98_202121-01-20211666": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_771_202007-09-2020654": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_654_202014-08-2020106": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_475_202018-06-2020402": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_315_202015-06-2020801": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_802_202025-09-2020570": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_326_202110-03-20211365": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_512_202126-03-2021158": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_615_202028-07-2020179": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_955_202004-11-2020385": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5_202108-01-20211730": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_871_202015-10-2020486": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_97_202024-01-2020586": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1550_201905-11-2019474": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_322_202019-05-2020528": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_819_202008-10-2020527": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_342_202016-05-2020534": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_132_202130-01-2021873": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1581_201916-11-2019386": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_237_202117-02-2021635": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_81_202122-01-2021958": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_12_202031-01-20201030": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_232_202018-05-2020850": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_556_202008-07-2020309": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_394_202015-07-2020717": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_726_202028-08-2020687": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1854_201903-01-2020922": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_433_202126-03-20211271": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_749_202007-09-2020650": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_408_202020-05-2020527": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_772_202007-09-2020655": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_634_202005-08-2020137": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1744_201906-12-2019208": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_487_202020-06-2020396": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_262_202013-03-202018": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_813_201917-06-2019898": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_784_202019-09-2020606": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_652_202014-09-2020955": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_119_202125-01-20211646": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1621_201914-11-2019422": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_415_202016-07-2020702": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_415_202027-05-2020495": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_72_202011-02-2020362": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_426_202117-03-2021281": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_597_202025-08-2020591": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_243_202119-02-2021591": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_419_202117-03-2021280": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1203_202004-01-20211158": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1195_202002-01-20211171": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_53_202014-01-2020709": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_922_202018-11-2020295": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_191_202003-03-2020125": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_525_202123-03-2021211": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_712_202026-08-202012": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_515_202026-06-2020381": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_353_202115-03-2021324": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1518_201906-11-2019463": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_620_201913-05-20191136": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_10_202102-01-20211774": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2_202010-01-2020733": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1173_202022-12-202021": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_625_202123-04-20213": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_301_202102-03-2021435": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1043_202020-11-2020270": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_273_202001-06-2020823": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_768_202003-09-2020665": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1627_201904-12-2019226": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1719_201912-12-2019124": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1530_201915-11-2019401": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_771_202016-10-2020857": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1538_201905-11-2019472": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_90_202014-02-2020291": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_881_202015-10-2020489": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_259_202123-02-20211466": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_252_202122-02-20211477": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_249_202124-02-2021518": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_609_202030-07-2020161": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_517_202001-07-2020355": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_271_202122-02-2021560": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1696_201928-11-2019281": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_841_202008-10-2020530": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_237_202118-02-20211500": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1531_201915-11-2019402": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_517_202131-03-2021147": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1131_201919-08-201986": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_561_202103-04-2021109": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_212_202013-05-2020863": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_292_202020-03-20202": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_115_202128-01-2021919": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_485_202018-06-2020405": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_920_202021-11-2020251": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1597_201915-11-2019408": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_215_202005-03-202075": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_947_202030-10-2020419": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1153_202006-01-20211136": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1051_202023-11-2020241": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1167_202018-12-202051": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1113_202004-12-2020151": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1196_202004-01-20211154": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_165_202103-02-20211609": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_862_201901-07-2019804": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_28_202010-01-2020737": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_404_202014-07-2020727": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1828_201901-01-2020944": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_978_202013-11-2020305": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1209_201929-08-20196": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_227_202117-02-2021631": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_211_202117-02-20211505": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_232_202124-02-2021516": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_449_202005-06-2020450": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_337_202013-05-2020564": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_285_202013-03-202020": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1126_201914-08-2019132": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_450_202102-04-20211249": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_802_201914-06-2019912": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1799_201913-12-2019116": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_300_202101-03-2021448": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_787_202021-09-2020599": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1807_201921-12-201914": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_654_201915-05-20191119": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_130_202025-02-2020174": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_199_202024-02-2020192": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1572_201914-11-2019417": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_109_202128-01-2021918": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_156_202106-02-2021746": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1105_201919-08-201984": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_703_202021-09-2020942": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1093_202030-11-2020180": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1120_202015-12-202060": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_748_202007-09-2020649": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_743_201904-06-2019939": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_288_202126-02-2021471": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_296_202009-06-2020806": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_572_202107-04-202160": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_323_202102-03-2021438": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_77_202012-02-2020333": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_316_202018-06-2020799": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_435_202001-06-2020469": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_481_202019-06-2020400": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_796_202017-09-2020613": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1556_201914-11-2019415": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_842_201926-06-2019831": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_33_202031-01-2020525": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_378_202026-05-2020497": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_382_202118-03-20211331": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_965_202011-11-2020335": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_221_202122-02-2021557": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_603_202109-04-202131": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_143_202102-02-2021833": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_660_202026-08-20205": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_74_202118-01-20211017": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_115_202122-01-20211651": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1632_201919-11-2019363": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_190_202011-05-2020884": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_179_202109-02-2021712": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1185_202004-01-20211152": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_173_202019-02-2020236": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_574_202123-04-20211": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_22_202108-01-20211104": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_467_202119-03-2021245": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_144_202101-02-2021854": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_370_202014-05-2020555": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_389_202026-05-2020500": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_228_202117-02-2021632": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_462_202012-06-2020424": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_648_202001-10-2020904": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1088_202007-12-2020136": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_693_202023-09-2020927": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_79_202122-01-2021956": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_954_201915-07-2019449": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_507_202001-07-2020353": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_532_202006-07-2020330": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_307_202016-01-20211038": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_615_201910-05-20191146": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1107_202007-12-2020138": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_576_201922-06-20191550": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1519_201907-11-2019447": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_563_202015-07-2020267": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_573_202016-07-2020262": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_607_201906-05-20191185": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1668_201909-12-2019162": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_739_202009-10-2020893": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_51_202115-01-20211054": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_524_202123-03-2021210": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_656_201915-05-20191120": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_384_202119-03-20211318": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_512_202120-04-20211180": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1795_201919-12-201931": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_293_202123-02-2021546": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1709_201926-11-2019308": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1710_201904-12-2019233": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1588_201915-11-2019405": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1608_201922-11-2019335": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_391_202008-07-2020741": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_588_202025-08-2020584": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_261_202126-02-2021468": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1189_201929-08-20194": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_125_202019-02-2020227": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_774_202001-10-2020549": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_218_202005-03-202077": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_886_202014-10-2020500": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_817_201922-06-2019861": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_256_202125-02-2021487": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_614_202006-08-2020127": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_240_202112-02-2021671": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_775_202011-09-2020625": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_39_202116-01-20211032": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1591_201919-11-2019357": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_970_202011-11-2020336": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1612_201915-11-2019410": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_98_202129-01-2021892": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1080_202007-12-2020132": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_976_202011-12-2020721": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1745_201907-12-2019195": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1118_201906-08-2019176": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_893_202021-10-2020445": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_419_202016-07-2020704": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_990_202030-10-2020423": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_284_202103-03-20211392": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_314_202110-03-20211360": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_531_202124-03-2021190": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_612_202028-07-2020177": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_496_202022-06-2020390": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_703_202021-08-202048": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_877_202015-10-2020488": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_162_202025-02-2020178": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1148_202021-12-202026": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_744_202028-08-2020692": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_276_202122-02-2021561": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_449_201924-05-20191675": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_469_202120-03-2021232": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_117_202023-01-2020601": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_636_202006-08-2020128": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_199_202012-05-2020872": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_279_202123-02-2021544": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_291_202018-03-202012": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_598_202027-07-2020188": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_374_202108-03-2021381": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1067_202024-11-2020220": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1132_202011-12-202095": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_369_202007-07-2020757": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1499_201911-11-2019430": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_446_202106-04-20211217": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_665_202019-08-202070": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_377_202022-05-2020510": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_171_202019-03-2020950": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1595_201919-11-2019359": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_700_202024-08-202035": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_368_202021-05-2020519": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1825_201924-12-20196": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_632_202003-09-2020983": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1081_201914-08-2019130": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_404_202028-05-2020486": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_455_202005-06-2020455": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_219_202123-02-2021539": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_152_202102-02-20211621": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_64_202011-02-2020357": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_766_202015-10-2020866": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_500_202131-03-2021143": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_635_202005-08-2020138": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_754_202003-09-2020664": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_834_202013-10-2020503": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_185_202108-02-2021732": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_326_202125-02-2021494": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_23_202004-02-20201018": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1707_201903-12-2019246": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1176_201926-08-201938": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_656_202019-08-202066": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_191_202011-05-2020885": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_874_201905-07-2019749": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_197_202013-05-2020861": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_580_202027-07-2020184": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1077_201906-08-2019173": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_13_202004-02-2020481": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_186_202108-02-2021733": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_56_202119-01-2021995": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_252_202115-03-2021322": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_640_202008-09-2020963": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_511_202004-07-2020338": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_939_202004-11-2020382": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_366_202102-04-2021116": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_495_202022-06-2020389": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_344_202016-05-2020535": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_161_202112-02-2021663": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_118_202029-02-2020961": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_480_202105-04-20211230": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_407_202015-07-2020719": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1648_201925-11-2019318": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1053_202023-11-2020243": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_464_202123-03-2021198": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_271_202002-06-2020818": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_525_202130-04-20213": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_523_202123-03-2021209": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_681_202018-08-202088": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_187_202011-05-2020882": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1017_202010-11-2020351": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_371_202014-05-2020556": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_169_202105-02-2021776": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_18_202107-01-20211123": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_309_202013-01-20211067": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_271_202125-02-20211442": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1121_202008-12-2020120": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_310_202108-03-20211382": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_519_202123-03-2021205": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_734_202008-10-2020900": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_541_202125-03-2021176": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_376_202118-03-20211327": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_230_202115-02-2021648": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1721_201909-12-2019165": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1754_201906-12-2019209": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_548_202103-04-2021106": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1576_201918-11-2019376": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_269_202119-02-2021598": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_166_202104-02-2021800": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_284_202124-02-2021521": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_352_202112-03-20211357": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_787_201926-06-2019827": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_728_202028-08-2020689": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_58_202118-01-20211012": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1470_201906-11-2019458": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_91_202110-02-2021696": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_490_202012-08-2020662": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1020_202010-11-2020354": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_758_202013-10-2020880": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_174_202019-02-2020237": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1004_202006-11-2020373": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_876_202015-10-2020487": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_835_202022-10-2020842": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_873_202019-10-2020461": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_350_202117-03-20211344": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_821_201906-07-2019735": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_453_202011-06-2020434": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1030_202018-11-2020300": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_149_202102-02-20211618": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1157_202018-12-202046": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_288_202012-05-2020569": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_684_202017-08-202095": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1181_201929-08-20193": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_737_201919-06-2019886": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6745_201921-11-2019535": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7173_201916-12-2019153": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_627_202108-03-2021727": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6483_201924-10-2019919": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1047_202127-04-202114": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6729_201905-11-2019800": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1661_201917-08-20192135": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1949_202021-11-2020449": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1546_202022-09-20201062": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1521_202029-09-2020973": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6586_201916-10-20191048": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7005_201906-12-2019350": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_745_202122-03-2021400": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_152_202014-02-2020352": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1825_201905-08-2019341": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_747_202009-07-20201424": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6533_201914-10-20191115": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_786_202020-06-2020618": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1844_202023-10-20201886": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_310_202024-02-2020266": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1091_201913-05-20191847": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_905_201901-05-20192974": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_811_201903-05-20191994": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_448_202006-03-202092": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_709_202004-07-20201474": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7096_201909-12-2019321": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1670_202005-10-20202189": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_296_202019-02-2020300": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6739_201905-11-2019806": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1670_201919-08-20192118": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1702_201925-07-2019529": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1035_202013-08-20201092": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1838_202023-10-20201882": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1760_201913-08-2019241": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1551_201911-07-2019831": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1282_202001-09-20201299": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6956_201905-12-2019359": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_749_202016-06-2020646": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7167_201916-12-2019152": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1801_201907-08-2019310": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_156_202029-01-2020609": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1544_202024-09-20201036": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_35_202028-01-2020624": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_191_202023-01-2020682": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_166_202005-02-2020518": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2099_202010-12-2020224": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7066_201910-12-2019282": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1199_202012-08-2020162": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6531_201917-10-20191015": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6906_201904-12-2019372": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7071_201918-12-201990": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1619_201911-07-2019836": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6615_201922-10-2019977": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1456_202007-09-20201252": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_59_202022-01-2020688": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1015_201902-05-20192027": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1618_202005-10-20202174": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1620_202029-09-2020987": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_86_202018-01-2020743": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2197_201919-10-2019985": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1081_202022-07-2020325": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_298_202019-02-2020302": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1520_201910-07-2019858": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_875_202028-07-20201266": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_42_202011-02-2020413": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_639_202109-03-2021705": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1358_201929-06-20191098": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6810_201913-11-2019698": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1797_202020-10-20201937": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_295_202025-02-2020249": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1391_201910-07-20192487": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7151_201912-12-2019238": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1110_201927-05-20191566": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1665_202005-10-2020914": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1224_201931-05-20191433": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6513_201901-11-2019834": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_848_202024-07-20201311": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_139_202023-01-2020676": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2043_202012-11-20201667": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_732_202117-03-2021567": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1211_201930-05-20191464": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2071_202014-12-2020145": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2343_201915-10-20191067": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1493_201901-07-20191084": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1964_201927-08-201955": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1386_202009-09-20201213": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6727_201915-11-2019657": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7147_201912-12-2019234": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6479_201911-10-20191132": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1788_201901-08-2019382": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6418_201910-10-20191155": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_130_202022-01-2020696": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1476_201902-07-20191061": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1047_202017-08-20201046": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6732_201905-11-2019801": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1972_201928-08-201933": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1616_201911-07-2019834": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_809_202021-07-20201353": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1842_201926-08-201981": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1599_201916-07-2019703": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7116_201916-12-2019145": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7059_201910-12-2019281": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1792_201901-08-2019384": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7223_201919-12-201981": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_114_202021-01-2020711": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1312_201912-06-20191287": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1517_202014-09-20201173": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_740_202015-06-2020657": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1469_201905-07-2019992": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_774_202014-07-20201386": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1355_201929-06-20191097": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1070_202018-08-20201019": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_56_202017-01-2020768": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1086_202022-07-2020329": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2342_201915-10-20191066": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6816_201918-11-2019621": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1254_202027-08-20201328": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6791_201929-11-2019428": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7190_201920-12-201964": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_297_202019-02-2020301": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_258_202013-02-2020376": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6981_201928-11-2019447": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_819_202106-04-2021146": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6388_201904-10-20191220": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_964_202106-04-2021161": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1560_202012-10-2020844": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1843_202002-11-2020650": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6902_201923-11-2019499": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1629_201910-07-2019870": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6771_201922-11-2019515": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6574_201905-11-2019793": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_973_202008-07-2020426": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1591_202001-10-20202218": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1531_202025-09-20202309": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7119_201911-12-2019257": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_891_202113-04-202141": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6551_201915-10-20191085": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2167_202023-12-202039": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_18_202027-01-2020646": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_42_202017-01-2020766": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_989_202007-08-20201161": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_281_202025-02-2020248": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6511_201911-10-20191136": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1037_202013-08-20201094": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_630_202117-03-2021547": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1742_202014-10-2020830": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7093_201919-12-201971": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_799_202020-07-20201367": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1668_201923-07-2019557": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_390_202005-06-2020725": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6767_201918-11-2019616": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_363_202027-02-2020215": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1139_201906-06-20192692": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_695_202115-03-2021626": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1905_202018-11-2020484": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_768_202017-06-2020641": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6412_201909-10-20191172": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1307_201902-07-20192613": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1487_202016-09-20201137": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1779_202017-10-20201973": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7115_201916-12-2019144": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1299_202010-09-20201196": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2302_202014-12-20201489": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_155_202004-02-2020535": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1680_202006-10-2020896": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1325_201903-07-20191032": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1157_202005-08-2020220": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1635_202006-10-20202140": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6893_201920-11-2019562": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1343_202001-09-20201301": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_413_202011-05-2020926": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_899_201925-05-20191609": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6495_201901-11-2019833": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1615_202005-10-20202171": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_900_202025-06-2020592": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6443_201910-10-20191161": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1899_201907-08-2019315": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2155_202021-12-202071": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6519_201924-10-2019922": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7234_201920-12-201966": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_688_202027-05-2020810": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_566_202110-03-2021661": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_340_202029-02-2020186": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6421_201919-10-2019991": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2030_202011-11-20201683": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_341_202025-02-2020250": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6424_201903-10-20191246": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1783_202020-10-2020728": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6573_201930-10-2019884": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1625_202029-09-2020988": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2091_202015-12-2020126": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1547_201909-07-2019916": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_723_201901-05-20192051": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7079_201913-12-2019215": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1731_202014-10-20202028": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_157_202004-02-2020537": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_673_202005-06-2020730": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1125_201924-05-20191650": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6735_201905-11-2019804": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1434_201908-07-2019941": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2172_202024-12-202020": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1530_201910-07-2019860": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2153_202023-12-202035": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1764_202003-11-2020634": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2255_201907-10-20191181": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6462_201916-10-20191044": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_70_202023-01-2020671": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_55_202021-01-2020705": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102_202028-01-2020621": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6955_201907-12-2019331": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1710_202013-10-20202055": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210_202010-02-2020443": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_901_201916-05-20191768": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_685_202008-06-2020717": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1816_202022-10-20201900": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6506_201911-10-20191133": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6783_201914-11-2019672": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6632_201923-10-2019957": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1656_202008-10-20202119": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6784_201911-11-2019722": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1430_202008-09-20201225": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1125_202024-08-2020959": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1623_202005-10-2020906": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1420_201929-06-20191102": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7070_201918-12-201989": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_519_202002-06-20201595": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7022_201906-12-2019353": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1089_201916-05-20191774": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_325_202013-05-2020916": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1434_202001-09-20201309": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_928_202109-04-202178": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1558_202030-09-2020961": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1652_201902-08-2019362": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2051_202003-12-2020307": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2116_202015-12-2020130": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1792_202027-10-2020681": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_887_202021-07-2020338": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1668_202030-09-20202237": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1344_201927-06-20191145": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1121_201901-06-20192730": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_680_202120-03-2021455": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_562_202106-03-2021737": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1296_201901-07-20192629": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7_202005-02-2020511": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1117_201901-06-20192726": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6624_201901-11-2019839": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_573_202108-03-2021718": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_197_202024-01-2020662": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2122_202021-12-202065": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_113_202021-01-2020710": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1766_202020-10-2020724": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1681_202006-10-2020897": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1469_202008-09-20201233": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7122_201911-12-2019259": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2137_202024-11-20201626": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2218_202005-12-20201535": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6428_201910-10-20191158": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1139_201928-05-20191538": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1403_202007-09-20201241": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_849_202024-07-20201312": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1637_201917-08-2019191": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6559_201919-10-2019995": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1398_201921-06-20191232": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6432_201909-10-20191175": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_997_202119-04-202121": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1489_201904-07-20191015": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_871_202020-06-2020620": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6920_201922-11-2019527": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1921_201919-08-2019186": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1019_202109-04-202183": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_228_202024-02-2020261": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1588_202001-10-20202215": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1556_202025-09-20201023": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1912_201916-08-2019214": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6675_201931-10-2019871": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_129_202007-02-2020471": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6787_201911-11-2019724": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1148_201907-06-20192683": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_752_202011-06-2020690": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_530_202004-06-20201585": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6992_201928-11-2019449": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6711_201923-11-2019490": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6982_201903-12-2019397": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1965_202023-11-2020438": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_309_202026-02-2020231": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2070_201929-08-201913": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1113_201930-05-20192751": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2097_202015-12-2020127": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1549_201911-07-2019829": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_689_202010-06-2020699": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6744_201913-11-2019697": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_967_202026-06-2020576": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_188_202013-02-2020374": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_947_202001-07-2020526": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1999_201928-08-201934": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6536_201914-10-20191118": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7146_201912-12-2019233": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6977_201903-12-2019394": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_255_202024-02-2020263": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1846_201914-08-2019231": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_856_202108-04-2021100": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1522_201908-07-2019946": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1918_201928-08-201929": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1608_202005-10-2020903": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1271_202005-09-20201260": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1998_202003-12-2020303": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7006_201905-12-2019362": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6395_201931-10-2019857": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6518_201925-10-2019896": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2117_202015-12-2020131": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1728_202014-10-20202025": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_934_202105-04-2021192": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6912_201904-12-2019373": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2130_202021-12-202068": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6957_201903-12-2019391": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_138_202023-01-2020675": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_222_202011-02-2020424": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2020_202010-11-20201695": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6666_201906-11-2019776": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_968_201910-05-20191866": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1554_201911-07-2019832": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6493_201910-10-20191163": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_888_202101-04-2021240": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6460_201916-10-20191043": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1006_202108-04-2021113": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_700_202123-03-2021366": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_518_202017-03-202031": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1552_202029-09-20202250": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1678_202006-10-2020894": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1720_202020-10-2020719": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1183_202006-08-2020211": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7045_201910-12-2019279": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1639_202030-09-2020964": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1797_201917-08-2019192": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1160_201924-05-20191653": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2067_202018-11-20201643": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6989_201906-12-2019348": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1826_202012-11-2020517": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_695_202029-05-2020789": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1365_201906-07-20192542": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_859_201904-06-20192703": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1237_202010-08-2020182": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_203_202013-02-2020375": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1753_201901-08-2019380": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6910_201926-11-2019477": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1390_201922-06-20191213": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2100_202010-12-2020225": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1544_201916-07-2019700": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1626_201909-08-20192166": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_984_201914-05-20192875": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1465_202021-09-20201072": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1265_201907-06-20191334": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2227_201901-10-20191254": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6854_201916-11-2019649": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1922_201926-08-201985": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_800_202101-04-2021233": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6688_201913-11-2019690": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_721_202117-03-2021560": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2106_202017-12-2020100": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_715_202011-06-2020688": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_699_202122-03-2021396": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_38_202003-02-2020542": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1308_201924-06-20191195": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_124_202018-01-2020745": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1102_201916-05-20191779": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6904_201921-11-2019543": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1798_202022-10-2020701": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7016_201902-12-2019413": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2360_202017-12-20201423": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7174_201916-12-2019154": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1046_202017-08-20201045": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2049_202012-11-20201672": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_375_202007-03-202079": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1156_201923-05-20191666": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1356_202021-08-202061": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6929_201923-11-2019502": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1131_202024-08-2020964": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_541_202119-03-2021482": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1614_201918-07-2019658": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1545_201910-07-2019865": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1320_201925-06-20191179": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2186_202023-12-202042": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1462_202008-09-20201232": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2003_201926-08-2019100": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_104_202013-02-2020368": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_354_202026-02-2020235": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1583_202014-10-2020823": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1354_202027-08-20201337": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1742_202014-10-20202037": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1622_202005-10-20202178": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1460_202010-09-20201205": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1554_202029-09-20202252": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6671_201912-11-2019707": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_73_202011-02-2020417": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7094_201910-12-2019286": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_858_202024-06-2020599": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_814_202021-07-20201358": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1860_201908-08-2019292": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_40_202012-02-2020387": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1179_201904-06-20191371": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_623_202118-03-2021515": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1530_201926-07-20192299": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2161_202022-12-202055": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_204_202110-02-2021717": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7_202003-01-20201406": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_469_202011-06-2020394": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_570_201915-05-20191308": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1103_202011-11-2020421": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1536_201904-12-2019261": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_417_202109-03-2021353": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1159_202017-11-2020389": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_903_202018-09-20201275": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_854_202015-09-20201328": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_81_202118-01-2021971": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_482_202108-04-202166": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_129_202101-02-2021817": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_989_202015-10-2020691": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_178_202117-02-2021648": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_299_202006-03-2020101": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_139_202128-01-2021870": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1286_202008-01-20211081": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_277_202004-03-2020145": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1646_201913-12-2019153": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_192_202103-02-2021788": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_878_201930-07-2019401": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1634_201924-12-20192": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1246_202016-12-202097": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_126_202014-02-2020357": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_458_202010-06-2020405": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1204_202020-11-2020358": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1676_201917-09-20201279": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_395_202117-03-2021278": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_721_202026-08-202017": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_227_202118-02-2021625": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_140_202122-02-2021576": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_990_202008-10-2020840": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2_202104-01-20211143": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_403_202110-03-2021335": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_339_202016-03-202045": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_747_201923-07-2019507": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_269_202012-03-202061": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_312_202006-03-2020103": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1009_201926-08-201989": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_300_202123-02-2021561": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_168_202011-02-2020428": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_368_202101-04-2021161": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_847_201919-07-2019567": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_925_202002-11-2020528": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_952_201929-08-20197": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_43_202024-01-2020890": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_14_202029-01-2020742": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_335_202124-02-2021544": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_200_202012-02-2020403": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1_202106-01-20211113": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_205_202110-02-2021718": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_575_201917-05-20191274": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_603_202017-08-2020147": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_887_201909-08-2019257": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_715_202007-09-20201411": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_819_202003-09-20201474": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_671_202018-08-2020127": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_159_202010-02-2020456": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1601_201902-01-20201426": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_270_202028-02-2020203": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_86_202026-05-2020877": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_740_202003-09-20201466": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1589_201903-01-20201410": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_240_202018-03-202010": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_353_202104-03-2021437": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_877_202005-10-2020930": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_631_202014-08-2020173": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1364_202029-01-2021852": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_474_202108-04-202165": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_785_202004-09-20201445": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_521_201918-05-20191255": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_329_202006-03-2020106": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_284_202013-03-202053": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_541_202108-04-202168": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_321_202004-03-2020150": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_729_202021-08-202080": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_238_202025-02-2020249": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_824_201924-07-2019497": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_109_202031-01-2020693": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_521_202115-04-202120": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_30_202118-01-20211537": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1243_202010-12-2020164": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1490_201903-12-2019282": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_848_202018-09-20201269": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1471_201903-12-2019280": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_481_202119-03-2021255": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_345_202116-03-2021301": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1020_202023-10-2020583": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_909_202029-09-20201042": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_869_201907-08-2019282": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_471_201914-05-20191318": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1142_202023-11-2020321": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1044_202029-10-2020545": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_21_202009-01-20201356": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1006_202015-10-2020694": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_680_201924-06-2019918": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_805_202003-09-20201472": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_580_202025-08-202034": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_274_202122-02-2021584": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_892_201905-08-2019334": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_364_202017-03-202036": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_985_202012-10-2020784": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1041_202027-10-2020569": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1189_202027-11-2020267": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_547_202002-07-2020316": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_567_201923-05-20191179": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_214_202025-02-2020246": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1661_201918-12-201969": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_930_201926-08-201981": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1052_202006-11-2020479": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1312_202017-12-202088": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_540_202102-04-2021150": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_503_201913-05-20191335": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_48_202121-01-2021907": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_616_202010-08-2020213": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_142_202105-02-2021759": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_476_201924-05-20191157": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_812_202004-09-20201452": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_342_202126-02-2021505": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1582_201904-12-2019265": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_19_202113-01-20211024": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_966_202009-10-2020802": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_894_202023-09-20201165": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1615_201918-12-201963": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_277_202112-02-2021684": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_484_202015-06-2020380": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1306_202017-12-202087": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1023_201928-08-201937": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_707_201917-06-2019973": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_40_202112-01-20211044": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1270_202015-12-2020113": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_934_202012-10-2020774": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_131_202010-02-2020449": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_231_202117-02-2021654": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_351_202125-02-2021528": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_393_202102-04-2021136": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_216_202019-02-2020293": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_795_202004-09-20201450": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1581_201909-12-2019205": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_896_201905-08-2019336": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_598_201913-06-2019989": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_304_202117-02-2021658": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_432_201917-06-2019969": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_241_202012-03-202058": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1348_202005-01-20211137": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1007_202003-11-2020513": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_710_202020-08-202094": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_208_202022-09-20201840": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_66_202113-01-20211029": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_330_202012-03-202064": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_390_202110-03-2021334": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1599_201907-12-2019221": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_556_201914-05-20191326": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_747_202026-08-202020": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_303_202016-03-202042": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_244_202024-02-2020269": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_122_202012-02-2020392": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_83_202027-01-2020815": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_338_202016-03-202044": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1663_201920-12-201940": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_816_202007-09-20201423": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_769_202027-08-20201537": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_343_202126-02-2021506": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_111_202027-01-2020819": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_775_202026-08-202027": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1633_201903-01-20201414": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1481_201911-12-2019173": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_623_202017-08-2020151": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103_202001-06-2020820": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_251_202011-05-2020549": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_990_201920-08-2019160": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_13_202106-01-20211120": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_584_201922-05-20191199": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1197_202023-11-2020329": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_940_202006-10-2020905": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1612_201910-12-2019191": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1036_202005-11-2020491": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_74_202028-01-2020781": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_841_202022-09-20201198": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_450_202120-03-2021238": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_213_202026-02-2020228": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1129_202017-11-2020387": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1066_202028-10-2020559": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_15_202112-01-20211039": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_132_202129-01-2021850": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_733_202020-08-202097": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_777_202007-09-20201419": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_523_201907-05-20191402": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_319_202126-02-2021501": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_686_201919-06-2019952": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_836_202029-09-20201040": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_75_202020-01-20201094": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1135_202006-11-2020482": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_987_202015-10-2020689": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_339_202108-03-2021363": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_659_201925-06-2019912": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1524_201909-12-2019203": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_999_202022-10-2020596": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_543_201910-05-20191356": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1198_202019-11-2020368": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_91_202010-02-2020441": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_766_202007-09-20201417": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_473_202010-06-2020409": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_61_202026-02-2020225": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_880_202023-09-20201162": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_173_202010-02-2020461": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_263_202004-03-2020143": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1561_201903-01-20201409": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1667_201922-01-20201004": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_676_202014-08-2020180": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1652_201921-12-201927": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_538_202001-07-2020328": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1076_202028-10-2020562": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_914_202022-09-20201205": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1017_202010-11-2020432": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1016_201927-08-201961": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_667_201907-06-20191018": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_748_202026-08-202021": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_725_202011-09-20201352": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_63_202111-01-20211063": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1588_201909-12-2019206": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_986_202013-10-2020750": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1019_202022-10-2020598": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_142_202103-03-20211294": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1591_201909-12-2019207": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_561_202014-08-2020169": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_655_201903-06-20191052": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1353_202006-01-20211126": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_21_202104-02-2021774": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_333_202005-03-2020122": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_953_201921-08-2019138": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_59_202020-01-20201091": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_923_202030-09-20201009": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1190_202023-11-2020326": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_245_202024-02-2020270": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_295_202024-02-2020381": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_944_202113-04-202130": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_136_202108-02-20211084": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_581_202115-03-2021474": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1223_201910-07-2019338": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1585_202014-10-20201127": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_902_201920-05-2019699": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_357_202101-02-20213075": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2641_201924-12-201920": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1204_201911-07-2019316": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_977_201928-05-2019633": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1726_202004-11-2020679": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1212_202031-08-20201673": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2325_201902-12-2019540": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1316_201924-07-2019152": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1012_201907-06-2019568": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_478_202017-03-20201217": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1061_202013-08-2020157": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_38_202112-01-20211628": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1811_202018-11-2020522": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_502_202013-03-2020108": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_897_202105-04-2021128": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1703_201918-09-20191431": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_87_202004-02-2020674": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_353_202104-02-20211137": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1493_202026-08-2020987": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_675_202004-06-2020844": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2604_201902-01-20201163": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1490_202016-10-20201057": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_120_202113-01-20211603": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_550_202112-03-2021501": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_266_202127-01-20211363": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_683_202122-03-2021322": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_870_201909-05-2019772": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_641_202020-05-20201918": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1907_202018-12-202078": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1879_201913-11-2019778": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1240_201903-09-20191678": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_570_202028-05-2020872": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_269_202127-01-20211366": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1002_201904-06-2019581": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_37_202015-01-2020963": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1224_201925-07-2019120": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1040_202030-07-2020242": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_174_202027-01-2020763": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1079_201924-06-2019503": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1004_201910-06-2019556": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1046_201920-06-2019511": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_81_201919-06-20191582": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1147_201904-07-2019396": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1806_202001-12-2020419": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_727_202018-06-2020686": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_332_202026-02-2020349": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2277_201920-11-2019684": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_41_202005-02-20201693": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_680_202119-03-2021356": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1780_202009-11-2020617": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1916_202025-11-2020454": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_757_202016-06-2020727": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2176_202011-01-20211662": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_110_202102-02-20211183": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1569_201912-09-20191547": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1313_202022-09-20201395": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2121_202016-12-2020136": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1967_202007-12-2020387": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1702_202002-11-2020740": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1959_202006-10-20203189": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_213_202019-02-20201486": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_157_202107-04-202140": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2091_202018-12-202085": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_933_201923-05-2019670": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_822_201902-05-2019839": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1607_202015-10-20201090": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2696_202024-11-20202261": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_882_201909-05-2019778": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_752_202105-04-2021112": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101_202125-01-20211372": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1497_202023-10-2020820": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1005_202013-08-2020149": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1735_201923-09-20191349": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1636_202003-11-2020694": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_499_202102-03-2021654": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1321_202013-08-20201195": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_794_202006-07-2020527": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_395_202109-02-20211072": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_974_202023-07-2020328": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_980_202123-04-20211": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_176_202105-02-20211112": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_814_202026-06-2020626": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1170_201903-07-2019419": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_875_201910-05-2019765": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_806_202030-06-2020595": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1007_202126-04-202115": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1690_202022-10-2020865": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_113_202112-01-20211635": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_639_202020-05-20201916": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_358_202110-02-20211023": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_386_202006-03-20201288": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1104_201927-06-2019461": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2228_201920-11-2019674": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_941_201922-05-2019685": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1744_202028-10-2020800": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_554_202015-05-2020947": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_64_202105-01-20213640": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1173_201910-07-2019327": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_241_202028-02-2020302": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2477_201911-12-2019391": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2216_202019-01-20211496": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_615_202027-05-2020885": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1034_201901-07-2019431": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_894_202105-04-2021125": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_582_202110-03-2021527": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_246_202115-01-20213395": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1836_202005-11-2020668": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_185_202118-01-20211512": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1136_201908-07-2019372": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_895_201907-05-20191319": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_156_202105-02-20211109": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_182_202102-02-20211186": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_73_202004-03-2020248": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_540_202018-03-202062": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2564_202011-11-20202437": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1545_202009-10-20201181": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1769_202010-12-2020353": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1021_202030-07-2020241": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_26_202104-01-20211748": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_297_202101-02-20211214": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_243_202028-02-2020303": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_629_202122-02-20212631": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_653_202017-06-2020701": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1100_201925-06-2019489": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1227_202024-09-20201355": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1416_201929-08-201911": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_137_202013-02-20201564": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_565_202126-02-2021713": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_916_202016-07-2020426": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2219_201907-11-2019837": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_40_202106-01-20211717": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_920_201930-05-2019613": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1174_201908-07-2019376": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_278_202031-01-2020726": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_898_202105-04-2021129": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1423_202024-09-20201364": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_904_201915-05-2019721": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1881_202012-11-2020558": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1432_201906-09-20191620": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2140_202017-12-2020114": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1135_202024-08-202032": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_55_202018-03-202047": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1737_202020-11-2020494": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_411_202110-02-20211033": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1289_201923-07-2019165": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_523_202103-03-2021633": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_548_202019-05-2020922": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_818_202030-06-2020598": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_832_202001-07-2020579": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_948_201922-05-2019690": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_217_202024-02-2020375": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2184_202022-12-202047": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1766_202009-11-2020614": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_471_202125-02-2021736": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1154_201905-07-2019385": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_64_202120-01-20211447": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_850_201906-05-2019806": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_9_202107-01-20211701": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2178_202024-12-202010": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1933_202001-12-2020424": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1694_202021-12-202055": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1499_202013-10-20201142": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1747_202028-10-2020803": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1000_201904-06-2019579": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_637_202115-03-2021478": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_940_202017-07-2020403": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_376_202028-02-2020312": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_394_202109-02-20211071": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_127_202028-02-2020296": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_118_202007-02-2020604": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_43_202113-01-20211601": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_758_202019-06-2020678": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1390_202015-10-20201082": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1965_202003-12-2020413": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_923_202107-04-202152": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1225_202027-07-20201343": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_227_202029-02-20201374": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_342_202123-02-2021793": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1030_201918-06-2019521": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_707_202116-03-2021454": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_947_202021-07-2020358": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2429_201902-01-20201159": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_688_202025-08-202017": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_333_202026-02-2020350": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1671_202009-09-20203637": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2040_202010-12-2020362": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1682_202002-11-2020734": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1331_201931-07-201987": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1149_201905-07-2019384": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1269_201922-07-2019188": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2094_202008-01-20211684": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_288_202027-02-2020328": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1582_202023-10-2020827": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1364_201931-07-201998": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1572_202020-10-2020905": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_895_202027-07-2020290": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_622_202029-05-2020861": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_465_202029-05-2020859": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_110_202005-02-2020650": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1089_201920-06-2019517": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_816_202125-03-2021265": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_221_202024-01-2020794": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1176_201911-07-2019311": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_221_202024-02-20201451": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2035_202010-12-2020360": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_54_202003-02-2020691": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_253_202125-01-20211377": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_223_202024-01-2020796": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_719_202125-03-2021254": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_511_202108-03-2021587": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1561_202012-10-20201163": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_803_202026-06-2020625": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_455_202006-03-2020197": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1082_201926-06-2019476": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_906_202106-04-202192": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1987_202026-11-2020441": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2317_202028-10-20202735": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1850_201916-10-20191136": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1396_202013-10-20201135": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1061_201918-06-2019524": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_370_202125-02-2021727": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1005_201910-06-2019557": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_307_202102-02-20211192": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1582_202007-09-20203694": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_184_202118-01-20211511": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1698_202020-11-2020493": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_17_202007-02-2020593": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2166_201920-11-2019671": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1162_201911-07-2019309": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1453_202012-10-20201156": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_789_202127-04-20215": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_574_202019-05-2020927": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2226_202022-10-20202799": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_233_202102-02-20211188": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_944_202015-07-2020454": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_635_202109-03-2021567": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1509_202016-10-20201064": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_379_202111-02-2021995": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2676_201917-01-2020931": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_19_202006-01-20202081": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_930_202014-07-2020477": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1044_202007-08-2020186": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_453_202013-03-20201245": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_54_202114-01-20211570": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_402_202109-03-2021548": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_24_202104-01-20211746": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_256_202029-01-2020751": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2174_202024-12-20208": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_649_202112-03-2021508": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_220_202024-01-2020793": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_865_202102-04-2021167": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_674_202112-03-2021514": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1083_202019-08-202086": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1107_201926-06-2019482": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_258_202029-01-2020753": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_129_202023-01-2020811": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_847_202131-03-2021229": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_618_202118-03-2021400": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_903_202106-04-202189": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1263_202015-09-20201532": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1837_202005-11-2020669": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_602_202013-05-20201953": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_608_202112-03-2021506": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2603_201924-12-201914": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1074_201926-06-2019475": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_348_202115-02-2021957": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_37_202005-02-20201689": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_318_202024-02-2020388": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1849_202009-11-2020627": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_592_202012-05-20201956": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_127_202119-01-20211480": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_538_202124-02-2021778": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_887_201910-05-2019766": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_350_202117-03-2021417": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2117_202014-12-2020175": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_857_201902-05-2019842": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_970_201927-05-2019647": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1118_201927-06-2019464": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_947_201923-05-2019671": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1235_201916-07-2019262": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_273_202005-03-2020225": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_509_202020-05-2020914": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2205_202004-01-20211761": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_760_202119-03-2021368": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1714_202003-11-2020699": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2077_201930-10-2019929": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_771_202022-06-2020666": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_302_202101-02-20211219": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_64_202023-01-2020802": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2113_202006-01-20211722": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_678_202116-04-202115": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_248_202115-01-20213396": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1819_202004-11-2020685": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1382_201925-07-2019139": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_22_202017-01-2020909": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2690_202024-11-20202258": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1814_201927-09-20191224": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_708_202116-03-2021455": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1795_202003-11-2020708": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_845_202131-03-2021227": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_672_202112-03-2021513": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1256_202029-09-20201310": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_153_202105-02-20211108": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1398_202023-10-2020818": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_278_202110-02-20211018": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_224_202121-01-20211433": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1504_201913-09-20191509": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_904_202106-04-202190": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_877_201909-05-2019775": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_361_202019-03-202035": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2605_202018-11-20202371": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_777_202030-06-2020593": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1680_202021-10-2020892": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_376_202005-03-20201324": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_558_202019-05-2020925": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1251_201918-07-2019225": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_90_202120-01-20211452": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1466_202025-08-20201011": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2208_202019-01-20211495": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_907_202106-04-202193": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_389_202004-03-2020263": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_802_202001-07-2020575": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_35_202014-01-20201860": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_585_202011-05-20201970": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_50_202119-02-2021906": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_952_202120-04-20219": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1153_202009-09-20201618": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1352_202022-09-20201400": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2233_201914-11-2019770": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2326_202028-10-20202739": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_892_202015-07-2020448": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_638_202115-03-2021479": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_993_202126-04-202112": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1556_202029-10-2020758": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_157_202028-02-2020298": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_619_202116-03-2021448": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1576_202029-10-2020760": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1589_202028-10-2020776": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_354_202028-02-2020310": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_81_202005-02-2020646": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_427_202001-01-20211770": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1053_201925-06-2019486": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_392_202108-02-20211104": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1137_201901-07-2019443": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_205_202103-02-20211147": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_886_201913-05-2019746": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1813_202009-11-2020622": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1583_202014-10-20201125": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_15_202005-02-2020637": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1342_202009-10-20201166": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1203_201922-07-2019184": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1148_201903-07-2019418": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_955_202120-04-202110": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1986_202007-12-2020390": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_981_202023-07-2020330": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1340_202022-10-2020847": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_605_202021-05-2020908": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1362_201929-08-20196": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_16_202007-02-2020592": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_874_202010-08-2020174": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_357_202005-03-2020233": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1199_201909-07-2019352": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1468_202013-10-20201139": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_919_202014-07-2020472": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1196_201910-07-2019335": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1951_201901-11-2019885": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1578_201904-09-20191675": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_711_202012-06-2020767": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_670_202002-06-2020851": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_250_202105-02-20211116": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_267_202027-02-2020325": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_612_202019-06-2020675": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_626_202122-03-2021320": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_782_201901-05-2019854": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1070_202013-08-2020158": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101_202107-01-20213582": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_624_202026-05-2020893": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_89_202117-02-2021936": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_902_202023-06-20201731": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_387_202111-02-2021996": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_792_201902-05-2019837": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_416_202011-09-20201565": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1775_202018-11-2020520": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1166_202014-09-20201544": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1290_201923-07-2019166": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1299_201925-07-2019121": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2093_202023-02-2021811": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1642_202028-10-2020784": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_710_202026-05-20201885": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1689_201919-09-20191403": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1306_201922-07-2019192": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_535_202018-03-20201206": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_892_202120-04-20216": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1803_202022-09-20203393": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1684_202020-11-2020492": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1282_201922-07-2019190": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1047_201917-06-2019532": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_932_202014-07-2020479": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1283_201919-07-2019210": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_896_202027-07-2020291": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1048_202031-07-2020231": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_819_202030-06-2020599": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1846_201915-10-20191165": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_520_202020-05-2020915": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_89_202004-02-2020676": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1450_201905-09-20191645": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2128_201911-11-2019802": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_684_202119-03-2021359": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_551_202124-03-2021291": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1348_202013-08-20201216": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1015_201907-06-2019569": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1350_201925-07-2019134": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_286_202028-02-2020306": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1525_201906-09-20191631": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1679_202021-10-2020891": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_116_202109-03-2021547": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_607_202112-03-2021505": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_86_202120-01-20211451": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_641_202115-03-2021481": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1054_201927-06-2019453": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_892_201927-05-2019642": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_583_202110-03-2021528": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_142_202007-02-2020608": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2004_202015-12-2020156": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_695_202016-06-2020718": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_939_201924-05-2019654": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_603_202021-05-2020906": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_409_202110-02-20211031": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1637_202016-10-20201068": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2579_201924-12-201913": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1769_202015-09-20203487": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3002_202017-12-20201879": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1254_202029-07-20201309": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_894_202027-07-2020289": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_98_202116-02-20211380": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_726_201905-11-2019390": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4_202105-01-2021701": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_851_201916-12-201959": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_437_202009-09-2020498": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_342_202009-07-2020132": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_75_202104-02-20211519": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_166_202101-04-2021804": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_687_201922-10-2019480": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_293_201913-05-20191928": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_853_201913-12-2019109": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_529_202015-10-20201081": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_695_202016-12-2020555": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_189_202103-03-2021297": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_760_202022-01-2021586": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_258_202124-03-2021130": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_667_201926-09-2019633": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_568_201908-08-2019111": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_53_202121-01-2021593": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_649_202025-11-2020776": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_588_201915-10-2019534": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_136_202124-02-2021366": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_42_202115-01-2021634": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_757_202023-12-202013": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_552_201913-09-20192246": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_284_202020-07-202066": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_389_202001-09-20201274": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_838_201910-12-2019127": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_540_201927-07-2019207": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_256_202016-07-202087": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_515_202005-10-20201153": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_707_202010-12-2020132": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_704_201919-11-2019293": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_20_202106-01-2021695": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_216_202016-06-2020384": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_509_202003-10-20201177": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_68_202129-01-2021547": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_801_201916-11-2019325": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_741_201921-12-2019864": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_142_202110-03-20211062": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_11_202012-02-2020222": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_717_201913-11-2019359": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_119_202110-02-2021458": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_155_202101-03-2021319": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_690_201911-10-2019562": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_609_202005-11-2020870": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_87_202018-02-2020681": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_692_201926-09-2019634": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_400_202002-09-20201264": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_597_201903-10-20191874": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_211_202012-06-2020389": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_75_202102-02-2021523": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_678_202010-12-2020723": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_537_202012-10-2020391": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_218_202029-06-2020253": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_876_201919-12-201931": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_675_201918-11-20191546": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_781_201913-11-2019367": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_525_202008-10-2020402": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_200_202109-03-2021225": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_196_202109-03-2021223": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_38_202027-01-2020351": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_421_202028-08-2020528": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_109_202116-03-2021191": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_540_202014-10-20201100": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_112_202120-02-20211331": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_324_201924-05-2019588": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_65_202020-02-2020166": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_698_201902-12-20191464": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_109_202007-03-2020565": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_52_202121-01-2021592": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_192_202021-05-2020340": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_607_202005-11-2020282": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_713_201906-12-20191415": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_583_201925-09-20191914": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_263_202131-03-202198": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_152_202004-06-2020311": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_862_201919-12-201930": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_544_202017-10-20201070": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_422_201921-06-2019442": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_736_201913-11-2019366": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_37_202023-01-20201127": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_321_202008-07-2020145": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_58_202011-02-2020236": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_734_201902-11-2019407": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_410_202007-09-20201250": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_201_202109-03-2021226": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_494_201916-08-2019847": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_563_201906-08-2019143": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_24_202013-01-20201196": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_57_202125-01-2021574": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_393_202001-09-20201278": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_330_202009-07-2020131": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_545_202014-10-2020367": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_99_202117-02-20211363": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_717_202010-12-2020136": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_701_201915-11-2019334": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_108_202118-02-20211346": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_392_202001-09-20201277": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_51_202010-02-2020253": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_558_201906-08-2019141": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_401_202002-09-20201265": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_476_202023-09-2020466": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_633_202020-11-2020812": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_179_202101-03-2021327": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_35_202115-01-2021632": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_195_202108-03-2021237": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_523_201906-08-2019138": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_669_201913-11-20191583": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_691_202027-11-2020178": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_382_201914-05-2019653": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_43_202116-01-2021624": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_84_202013-02-2020723": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_799_201914-11-2019348": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_33_202108-02-2021475": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_646_202024-11-2020782": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_9_202108-01-2021671": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_332_202016-07-202090": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_765_201930-10-2019441": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_363_202015-09-2020480": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_204_202002-06-2020319": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_150_202120-03-2021963": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_638_202023-11-2020787": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_59_202012-02-2020226": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_835_201906-12-2019152": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_504_201910-07-2019342": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_316_202013-07-2020114": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_107_202007-03-2020563": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_639_202023-11-2020788": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_124_202020-03-20205": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1959_201915-11-2019273": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_489_202015-05-2020201": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_786_202007-08-202064": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_66_202018-01-2020463": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_305_202006-03-202045": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1974_201907-01-2020498": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1551_201920-09-2019592": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_510_202021-03-20202": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_980_201917-05-2019391": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_620_202119-03-2021185": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_544_202014-05-2020204": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1552_201922-08-201941": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1942_201914-10-2019448": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_155_202023-01-2020426": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1561_201912-09-2019662": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1038_202010-09-2020795": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_983_202015-09-2020779": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_30_202009-01-2020487": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_843_201906-05-2019478": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_564_202104-03-2021351": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_504_202125-02-2021425": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_657_202122-03-2021165": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1864_201925-09-2019549": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1244_201919-07-2019128": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_392_202003-03-202091": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_259_202015-02-2020194": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1659_202024-12-20203": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2055_201911-11-2019315": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_884_202122-04-20219": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_274_202007-02-2020300": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_725_202119-03-2021192": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_472_202108-03-2021308": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1241_202014-10-2020617": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1621_201902-09-2019729": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2329_201918-12-201949": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1150_201929-06-2019211": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_545_202026-05-2020177": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_833_202109-04-202137": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_479_202125-02-2021420": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1021_202008-09-2020810": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1771_201924-09-2019563": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_272_202007-02-2020298": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_196_202001-02-2020350": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2081_201911-11-2019316": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2238_201919-12-201928": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_275_202018-02-2020171": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_349_202003-03-202086": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2257_201912-12-2019135": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1784_201921-09-2019586": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_460_202015-05-2020198": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1404_202002-11-2020507": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_915_202027-08-2020845": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_856_201903-05-2019503": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_906_201902-05-2019533": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2176_201929-11-2019202": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_78_202001-02-2020345": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1995_201913-11-2019301": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_665_202125-03-2021128": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1318_202020-10-2020583": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2258_201906-12-2019177": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_554_202103-03-2021370": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_789_202102-04-202197": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_974_202008-09-2020808": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1678_201903-09-2019716": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_623_202009-06-2020148": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1191_202005-10-2020680": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2120_201915-11-2019283": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_422_202123-02-2021472": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1583_202014-12-2020147": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1350_202023-10-2020554": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_964_202003-09-2020825": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_522_202015-03-2021254": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1589_201924-08-201934": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_847_202024-08-202016": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1775_201912-09-2019668": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_496_202112-03-2021266": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2168_201923-11-2019239": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_799_202105-04-202163": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1981_201915-10-2019444": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1506_202014-12-2020143": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1442_201912-09-2019661": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_923_201928-05-2019299": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1271_201920-07-2019126": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1679_202018-12-202099": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_730_202119-03-2021197": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1665_201928-08-201922": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_683_202108-04-202142": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2088_201921-11-2019250": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1909_201903-10-2019504": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1696_201931-08-2019735": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_690_202118-03-2021220": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_723_202119-03-2021190": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_56_202022-01-2020432": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_874_202027-08-2020841": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2025_201931-10-2019369": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_620_202002-06-2020167": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_896_202026-08-20207": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_350_202003-03-202087": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_282_202014-02-2020203": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_151_202028-01-2020386": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_118_202021-01-2020445": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1977_201915-10-2019440": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1003_201927-05-2019304": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1606_202009-12-2020216": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1695_202021-12-202056": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1817_201919-09-2019616": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1455_201903-08-201981": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2005_201918-10-2019406": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1862_201927-09-2019527": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1431_202005-11-2020482": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1249_201912-07-2019159": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1239_202012-10-2020639": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_855_202021-08-202024": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1650_201904-09-2019705": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2054_201905-11-2019343": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1058_201904-06-2019256": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1250_202029-10-2020530": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1517_201920-08-201946": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1277_202017-10-2020600": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1651_202018-12-202092": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1364_201922-07-2019121": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_192_202017-02-2020179": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2027_201905-11-2019342": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1250_201911-07-2019166": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2143_201925-11-2019232": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1968_201914-10-2019450": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1980_201915-10-2019443": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_470_202112-03-2021265": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1070_201929-06-2019210": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2214_201911-12-2019143": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1924_201904-10-2019491": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1256_201911-07-2019169": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1312_202028-10-2020539": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6_202023-01-2020421": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1418_202004-11-2020490": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_526_202021-05-2020186": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1529_202001-12-2020284": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_864_202127-04-202110": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1293_201918-07-2019130": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2023_201911-11-2019313": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_925_201910-05-2019434": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2145_201921-11-2019252": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2109_201928-11-2019210": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_183_202003-02-2020338": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_516_202102-03-2021386": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1639_201918-09-2019623": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1565_202008-12-2020226": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_537_202122-03-2021158": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_430_202102-03-2021382": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_752_202122-03-2021168": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1309_202028-10-2020537": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1356_201931-07-201992": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_498_202108-03-2021309": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_171_202010-02-2020241": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1626_201929-08-20196": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1997_201917-10-2019417": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1907_201903-10-2019502": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1219_202014-10-2020613": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_179_202001-02-2020349": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_756_202014-08-202045": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1427_201905-08-201978": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_775_202125-03-2021131": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_376_202005-03-202059": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_857_202018-08-202038": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1744_201930-09-2019516": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1820_201919-09-2019619": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_932_202028-08-2020837": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_451_202018-03-20207": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1609_201912-09-2019664": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_436_202026-05-2020174": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2209_201905-12-2019185": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2048_201914-11-2019292": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1662_202024-12-20206": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_883_202122-04-20218": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_476_202125-02-2021419": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_424_202006-03-202048": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1638_201919-09-2019610": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_312_202026-02-2020139": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1813_201901-10-2019513": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_252_202005-02-2020324": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_954_202004-09-2020818": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1624_201928-08-201918": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2316_201906-01-2020503": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1447_202016-12-2020114": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_614_202109-03-2021294": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1240_202014-10-2020616": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_197_202010-02-2020242": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2302_201918-12-201946": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2016_201931-10-2019367": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2289_201911-12-2019146": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1928_201904-10-2019493": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1409_202003-11-2020498": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1798_201921-09-2019587": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_846_201902-07-2019208": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_456_202126-02-2021411": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_739_202122-03-2021167": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_767_202006-08-202067": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2283_201903-09-20192336": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6_202101-01-20212288": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1957_202008-10-2020926": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1568_202020-08-202050": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1700549_201903-07-20192461": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_649_202108-03-2021644": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1366_202017-08-202078": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1700870_201915-10-20192499": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_52_202017-02-2020442": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1937_202006-10-2020978": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1923_202014-10-2020840": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2669_201922-10-20191330": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1695_202006-10-2020970": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1898_202030-09-20201027": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1425_202017-09-20201172": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_9_202005-02-20201010": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2116_201919-09-20192007": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1361_202029-07-2020169": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1523_201909-07-20191085": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_11_202012-02-20201000": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_202_202130-01-20211396": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2977_201926-11-2019631": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_743_202120-04-20214": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_980_202016-07-2020320": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_79_202127-01-20211469": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1700761_201923-09-20192590": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_347_202026-02-2020327": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2933_201925-10-20191257": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_119_202120-01-20211598": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2224_201916-09-20192062": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2917_201906-12-2019439": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_994_201927-05-20191763": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_952_201917-06-20191502": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2061_202021-10-2020717": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_619_202019-06-2020729": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1077_202002-07-2020581": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1700810_201904-10-20192536": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2817_201915-11-2019924": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_872_202023-06-2020685": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_451_202006-03-2020162": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1386_202020-07-2020290": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4302_201913-12-2019250": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2652_202012-01-20211756": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_554_202102-03-2021787": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_286_202029-01-2020683": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1103_202013-07-2020395": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1598_202003-09-20201292": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_643_202108-03-2021640": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1700556_201908-07-20192435": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_164_202028-01-2020713": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1048_202008-07-2020457": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1907_202009-10-2020899": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4149_201931-01-2020649": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_332_202108-02-20211229": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2113_202022-10-2020694": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1700994_201913-12-20192414": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1732_201924-07-2019691": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1700995_201913-12-20192415": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1730_201918-07-2019857": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_401_202016-07-2020972": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1036_202001-07-2020595": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1701000_201916-12-20192410": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2481_201918-10-20191401": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6_202005-02-20201005": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2645_201909-10-20191616": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3_202017-01-20201026": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1535_202013-08-202092": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2273_201916-09-20192065": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2383_202025-11-2020289": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1700918_201907-11-20192460": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1700913_201906-11-20192468": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1700920_201907-11-20192461": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_140_202004-03-2020231": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_18_202101-01-20212292": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_640_202108-03-2021637": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4099_201905-12-2019473": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1926_202009-10-2020901": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2216_202012-11-2020411": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_42_202109-02-20211180": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1107_202016-07-2020323": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1700688_201909-08-20192138": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1466_202020-08-202039": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_441_202020-03-20209": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_76_202108-01-20212255": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1144_202018-12-20201342": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_821_202102-04-2021162": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_85_202013-01-2020887": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2531_202017-12-202076": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_863_202008-06-2020862": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_397_202012-03-2020131": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_53_202005-03-2020974": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1748_202017-09-20201185": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1700809_201904-10-20192535": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4285_201907-01-2020918": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4318_201924-01-2020773": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1872_201906-08-2019334": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_516_201921-06-20192477": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_19_202101-01-20212293": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2668_202004-01-20211862": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_179_202026-05-2020984": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_252_202016-03-202079": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1771_202021-09-20201146": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2904_201922-11-2019707": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1700790_201901-10-20192550": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1849_202024-09-20201085": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1298_202015-07-2020365": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1908_201911-09-20192149": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_497_202031-07-2020951": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_888_202009-06-2020848": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_448_202005-03-2020200": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_12_202111-01-20211778": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1387_202020-07-2020291": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1700850_201909-10-20192522": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2026_202013-10-2020868": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_681_202120-03-2021349": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1507_202018-08-202071": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1700562_201909-07-20192426": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_542_202008-06-2020849": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1685_202015-09-20201202": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4314_201910-12-2019361": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_260_202128-01-20211435": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1795_202029-09-20201039": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_473_202124-03-2021259": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4097_201906-12-2019446": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_113_202021-01-2020825": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_796_202122-03-2021324": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1700509_201920-06-20192485": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4321_201916-12-2019164": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2661_202012-01-20211758": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_58_202028-01-2020704": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_81_202003-02-2020633": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_140_202121-01-20211563": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_202_202029-01-2020677": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_324_202104-02-20211296": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_779_202120-04-20216": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_463_202004-03-2020242": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_440_202021-07-2020961": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1027_201915-05-20191904": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1135_202006-07-2020518": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1701004_201917-12-20192398": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_702_202116-03-2021522": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4166_201912-12-2019287": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_222_202106-02-20211243": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1594_202014-09-20201219": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2324_201905-11-20191123": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1700926_201911-11-20192456": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_635_202109-03-2021605": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_141_202125-01-20211500": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_333_202016-03-202080": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1_202004-02-20201013": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_113_202104-02-20211279": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_492_202105-03-2021694": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1430_202027-07-2020202": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_700_202102-04-2021157": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1579_202003-09-20201289": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_775_202130-04-202113": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1930_201907-08-2019295": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_741_202112-04-202145": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2126_202020-10-2020740": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_83_202017-02-2020444": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1700778_201924-09-20192581": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2409_202017-12-202067": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_795_202122-03-2021323": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2103_202015-10-2020830": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1181_202024-07-2020208": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1563_202007-09-20201249": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_740_202015-06-2020782": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1700777_201924-09-20192580": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_129_202017-01-2020857": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2280_201920-11-2019789": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4058_201909-12-2019379": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2201_202013-11-2020391": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1700758_201920-09-20192607": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1384_202014-09-20201215": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1588_202007-09-20201252": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2950_201926-10-20191249": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_639_202108-03-2021636": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_972_201910-06-20191529": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_49_202106-01-20212260": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_925_202021-07-2020260": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_18_202113-01-20211712": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2245_202005-11-2020532": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1700686_201909-08-20192136": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_320_202104-02-20211292": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1571_202020-08-202053": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2234_202011-11-2020439": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1700912_201906-11-20192467": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_552_202019-02-20211058": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_641_202020-06-2020713": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1130_202022-07-2020241": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_75_202028-01-2020705": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2270_201926-08-201928": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2745_201818-07-2019863": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2484_202004-12-2020206": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_628_202009-06-2020835": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2586_201927-09-20191801": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4423_201924-01-2020774": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4088_201923-11-2019688": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_916_202010-07-2020411": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3008_201908-11-20191024": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2811_201918-10-20191416": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1043_202001-07-2020596": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1700813_201904-10-20192539": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_738_202125-03-2021238": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_782_202103-04-2021127": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1796_202017-09-20201191": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4243_201913-12-2019247": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2345_202013-11-2020398": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_757_202006-06-2020867": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_171_202003-03-2020250": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1700861_201914-10-20192509": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_259_202128-01-20211434": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_920_202120-04-202118": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_332_202013-03-2020107": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_327_202026-02-2020326": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1140_202013-07-2020397": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_356_202026-02-2020333": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2275_201916-09-20192067": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2020_202019-10-2020750": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4249_201909-12-2019397": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_426_202103-03-2021744": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4225_201919-12-201964": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_667_202003-06-2020889": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1951_202014-10-2020843": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1486_202024-08-20203": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2210_201924-09-20191883": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3006_201906-11-20191104": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2867_201921-11-2019742": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1046_202015-07-2020348": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2659_202022-01-20211543": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2140_202003-11-2020573": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2801_201921-11-2019740": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2286_202013-11-2020393": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_521_202019-01-20211637": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1027_202002-12-20201415": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_703_202003-06-2020891": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_618_202110-03-2021573": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_742_202004-07-2020528": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4241_201913-12-2019246": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1803_201922-07-2019766": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_88_202004-03-2020228": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2142_202027-10-2020675": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2111_201907-08-2019302": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_149_202031-01-2020658": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_257_202103-03-2021735": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_281_202017-07-20204": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_68_202119-01-20211628": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_832_202010-06-2020821": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4316_201904-02-2020600": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1574_202018-08-202076": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_296_202006-03-2020160": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3062_201914-11-2019944": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1983_201907-08-2019299": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_816_202012-06-2020796": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8_202005-02-20201009": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1700941_201926-11-20192438": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_26_202101-02-20211358": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1700845_201909-10-20192518": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1288_202020-07-2020286": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1740_201926-07-2019578": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2255_202009-11-2020471": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2354_201904-09-20192309": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1701021_201920-12-20192394": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4062_201928-11-2019581": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_508_202125-02-2021883": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_801_202031-10-20201504": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4245_201919-12-201965": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2181_201903-09-20192331": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2353_201904-09-20192308": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3079_201918-11-2019885": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2185_202002-11-2020595": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2956_201906-12-2019441": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_676_202116-03-2021520": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_792_201918-06-20191489": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_491_202005-03-2020208": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_865_202010-06-2020825": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2062_201909-08-2019200": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2728_201906-12-2019438": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1937_201925-07-2019643": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_928_202019-06-2020736": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2537_201909-10-20191614": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_399_202105-03-2021685": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_799_202122-03-2021327": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1700766_201923-09-20192594": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4148_201910-12-2019346": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2348_202024-11-2020304": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1885_202009-10-2020897": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1651_202031-08-20201322": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2176_202004-11-2020549": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_592_202110-03-2021572": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2179_201904-09-20192299": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2993_201905-11-20191137": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_252_202029-01-2020680": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1295_202017-07-2020311": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1701009_201917-12-20192403": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2181_202031-10-2020606": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_151_202031-01-2020659": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_902_202010-06-2020827": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_792_202016-06-2020770": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_385_202110-03-2021565": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2170_202004-11-2020547": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_215_202005-03-2020189": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1954_201905-08-2019385": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1625_202017-09-20201173": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_491_202109-03-2021599": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1110_202003-07-2020559": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1700996_201913-12-20192416": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1170_201924-06-20191417": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1700734_201913-09-20192623": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2150_202028-10-2020656": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1_202122-01-20211528": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2540_202005-01-20211847": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1193_202027-07-2020194": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_703_202116-03-2021523": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1700579_201915-07-20192294": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_27_202101-02-20211359": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_781_202131-03-2021202": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1274_202029-07-2020162": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_516_202029-05-2020924": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1753_201919-08-201970": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1007_202006-07-2020513": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1700801_201903-10-20192547": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_647_202108-03-2021642": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_53_202106-01-20212263": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4074_201906-12-2019443": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_10_202120-01-20211592": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2511_202005-01-20211845": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2893_201907-11-20191062": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1447_202024-07-2020213": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2654_202004-01-20211860": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_327_202109-02-20211192": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_161_202120-01-20211600": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_286_202103-03-2021736": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_939_202120-04-202119": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1700692_201913-08-20192132": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_975_202020-06-2020720": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1752_201922-07-2019763": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4145_201927-11-2019618": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_248_202024-01-2020770": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2586_202019-12-202027": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1700750_201919-09-20192609": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4154_201910-12-2019348": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4253_201924-01-2020772": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1700883_201915-10-20192502": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_911_202020-06-2020718": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_559_202102-04-2021152": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_880_202009-11-20201467": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1700932_201913-11-20192449": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_622_202016-06-2020766": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3003_201910-12-2019337": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_36_202104-01-20212275": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_694_202105-04-20211889": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1122_202029-06-2020625": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_88_202119-01-20211629": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_857_202120-04-202111": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1875_201905-08-2019382": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_689_202115-03-2021546": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1700814_201904-10-20192540": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1487_202003-09-20201285": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2139_201930-09-20191748": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4308_201922-01-2020808": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1700909_201905-11-20192475": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_860_202014-08-202087": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_49_202013-01-20201204": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_126_202027-01-2020964": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_925_201927-08-201979": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1507_201915-02-2020475": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_151_202115-02-2021992": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_513_202011-05-2020526": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_701_202026-06-2020267": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_783_202016-07-2020141": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_117_202021-01-20201079": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_509_202113-04-202124": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_400_202116-03-2021498": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1463_201913-01-20201206": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_85_202020-02-2020366": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_10_202012-02-2020564": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_183_202104-03-2021669": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_141_202007-02-2020717": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_547_202021-05-2020453": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_579_202027-05-2020433": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_341_202025-02-2020325": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_577_202029-05-2020414": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_63_202118-01-20211388": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_530_202021-05-2020449": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_211_202013-02-2020545": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_632_202010-06-2020321": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_866_202012-08-2020110": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_67_202014-01-20201179": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1616_202006-01-20211570": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_814_202013-07-2020173": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1593_202018-12-2020112": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_477_202013-05-2020514": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_78_202119-01-20211374": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_875_202019-08-202065": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_747_202003-07-2020207": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_164_202027-02-2020252": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1575_202001-02-20211233": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_55_202017-01-20201144": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_70_202011-02-2020587": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_272_202013-02-2020552": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_284_202124-02-2021823": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_907_202020-08-202055": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1486_201904-02-2020797": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_447_202123-03-2021356": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1307_201921-12-201946": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_326_202104-03-2021679": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_185_202018-02-2020423": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_236_202013-02-2020547": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_286_202117-03-2021467": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1635_202005-01-20211599": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_42_202030-01-2020882": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_136_202108-02-20211120": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_218_202024-02-2020345": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_344_202028-02-2020233": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_650_202008-06-2020338": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_917_202024-08-202030": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_339_202017-03-202037": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_241_202010-02-2020631": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_613_202005-06-2020347": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_56_202022-01-20201049": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_163_202112-02-20211013": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_33_202112-01-20211460": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_539_202016-05-2020486": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_868_201920-08-2019189": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_205_202118-02-2021941": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_197_202013-02-2020544": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_742_202026-08-20201": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1596_202004-01-20211616": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_291_202124-03-2021311": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_334_202006-03-2020102": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_804_202013-07-2020172": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1598_202019-12-202086": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_385_202028-02-2020241": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_926_202021-08-202039": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_263_202117-03-2021466": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_548_202030-05-2020404": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_318_202115-03-2021527": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1619_202002-01-20211638": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1506_201922-01-20201058": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_123_202007-02-2020716": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_27_202029-01-2020922": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_409_202004-03-2020156": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_90_202003-02-2020819": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_277_202123-02-2021853": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_213_202111-02-20211048": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_23_202108-01-20211509": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_187_202017-02-2020445": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_254_202025-02-2020321": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1470_201908-01-20201255": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_477_202107-04-202191": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_614_202029-05-2020416": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_624_202004-06-2020370": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_794_202013-07-2020170": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_294_202115-03-2021525": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_122_202111-02-20211043": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_260_202126-02-2021782": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_868_201919-08-2019209": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_32_202113-01-20211443": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_367_202118-03-2021445": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_72_202009-01-20201236": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_761_202026-08-20202": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_532_202020-05-2020460": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_532_202107-04-202195": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_837_202019-08-202060": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_286_202024-02-2020349": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_401_202116-03-2021499": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_644_202009-06-2020328": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_29_202108-01-20211510": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_842_202019-08-202062": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_687_202023-06-2020280": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_468_202107-04-202188": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_433_202122-03-2021385": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_838_202024-08-202027": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_628_202029-06-2020251": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1332_201921-12-201947": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1504_202018-12-2020104": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_559_202029-05-2020410": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_50_202020-01-20201102": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_243_202010-02-2020633": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_384_202028-02-2020240": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1264_201924-01-20201000": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_521_202018-05-2020479": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1296_201921-12-201943": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_402_202116-03-2021500": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_823_201924-08-2019113": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1624_202004-01-20211618": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_461_202013-03-202064": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_68_202118-01-20211389": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_920_202024-08-202032": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1499_201905-02-2020776": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_363_202014-05-2020501": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100_202018-02-2020422": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_752_202029-06-2020261": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_367_202026-02-2020304": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_983_202025-08-202023": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_119_202024-01-2020998": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_386_202028-02-2020242": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1620_202004-01-20211617": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_203_202004-02-2020808": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_935_201928-08-201953": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_251_202011-02-2020603": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_165_202110-02-20211068": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_238_202015-02-2020484": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_923_202020-08-202057": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_625_202012-06-2020299": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_857_202012-08-2020108": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_31_202008-01-20201249": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_372_202003-03-2020181": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_476_202020-03-20203": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_366_202107-04-202187": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_397_202123-03-2021353": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_432_202015-05-2020495": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_536_202020-05-2020461": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_58_202113-01-20211446": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_128_202124-02-2021819": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_929_202025-08-202020": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_310_202116-03-2021491": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1182_202009-06-20201748": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702672_201922-07-2019944": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_125_201916-07-201916": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1137_202125-03-2021400": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_561_202026-02-20203620": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702120_201909-07-20191425": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_383_202128-01-20212395": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702561_201919-07-20191016": "DENIED", + "Bail_4600602_201918-10-20192021": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_433_202105-02-20215089": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3300985_201917-09-20195376": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_236_201902-12-20195": "DENIED", + "Bail_4701839_201906-07-20191508": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_38_202105-01-20216044": "DENIED", + "Bail_3302324_201916-11-20194721": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_567_202027-02-2020575": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3440_201911-07-20193720": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1722_202029-07-2020881": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702075_201921-06-20191893": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3302397_201919-11-20194679": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1185_202101-04-20213493": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_563_202018-03-202044": "DENIED", + "Bail_4601419_201920-11-20191137": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_979_202006-06-20201841": "DENIED", + "Bail_174_202020-01-20202254": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2100028_201909-05-20195792": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_710_202104-03-20211091": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_64_202023-06-20201494": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4701225_201906-05-20192832": "DENIED", + "Bail_4601812_201921-01-20202220": "GRANTED", + "Bail_73_202009-01-20202592": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_966_202005-06-20201889": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1534_202017-07-20201019": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_600_202017-03-202073": "GRANTED", + "Bail_10_202024-12-201910": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_228_201921-11-201914": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_762_202104-03-20214143": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3307_201904-07-20193870": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_330_202024-02-2020686": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4601253_201919-11-20191171": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_699_202003-03-20203363": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1607_202026-05-20203354": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_997_202117-03-20213791": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1510_202013-07-20202827": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102_202128-01-20212380": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4703206_201905-09-20193554": "DENIED", + "Bail_3302747_201902-12-20194545": "DENIED", + "Bail_3301571_201904-10-20195166": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3155_202016-10-20201992": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_922_202120-03-2021596": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702894_201916-08-2019336": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3492_202004-12-2020600": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_143_202110-02-20211864": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_484_202126-02-20211304": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1340_202011-06-20201669": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3300991_201917-09-20195379": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4703607_201904-10-20192665": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1582_202020-07-20202730": "DENIED", + "Bail_4702325_201909-07-20191431": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_814_202006-03-20203202": "DENIED", + "Bail_3300948_201919-09-20195332": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2401_202024-08-2020124": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1676_202028-07-20202662": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_153_202125-01-20212476": "DENIED", + "Bail_3302951_201910-12-20194389": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702220_201901-07-20191726": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_134_202028-02-2020493": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_616_202123-02-20211453": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1831_202007-08-20202479": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2282_202024-08-2020119": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_370_202010-06-20201691": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1062_202008-06-20201809": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_552_202112-02-20214776": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4703027_201924-08-2019154": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1250_202106-04-20213366": "DENIED", + "Bail_4601392_201928-11-2019840": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_567_202124-02-20211394": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_974_202103-03-20211177": "GRANTED", + "Bail_491_202012-02-20201151": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3410_202006-11-20201326": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_167_202115-01-20215808": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_707_202118-02-20211663": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_748_202006-06-20201837": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_368_202101-02-20215286": "DENIED", + "Bail_3300311_201909-08-20193121": "DENIED", + "Bail_4600941_201921-11-20191079": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2257_202013-08-2020564": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3695_202022-12-202046": "GRANTED", + "Bail_67_202015-01-20202403": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1926_202017-08-20202313": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1179_202101-04-2021308": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1555_202005-08-2020727": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_389_202018-02-2020856": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4703606_201930-09-20192770": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_999_202030-05-20202004": "DENIED", + "Bail_3301666_201916-10-20195039": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_256_202020-02-2020731": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4600833_201924-10-20191689": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_778_202005-03-20203227": "DENIED", + "Bail_3302790_201903-12-20194519": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4701944_201903-06-20192120": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2785_202007-10-20202239": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_175_202010-02-20204443": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1051_202117-03-2021725": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1303_202108-04-20213301": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1434_202125-03-2021424": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4703079_201909-10-20192545": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3172_202002-11-20201455": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2139_202019-08-2020298": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_499_202109-02-20214954": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3312_202017-10-20201954": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_176_202015-02-2020984": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3929_202011-12-2020451": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4601780_201913-01-20202518": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4701765_201907-06-20192029": "DENIED", + "Bail_4701726_201930-05-20192214": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1613_202027-05-20203315": "DENIED", + "Bail_4601705_201902-01-20202924": "DENIED", + "Bail_4702357_201917-07-20191099": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1611_202013-08-2020537": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_932_202018-03-20203007": "DENIED", + "Bail_4601707_201903-12-2019696": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1277_202014-07-20201048": "DENIED", + "Bail_718_202001-02-20201807": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3302704_201930-11-20194566": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_263_202125-01-20215542": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3530_201918-07-20193515": "DENIED", + "Bail_2100176_201926-07-20195161": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_317_202101-02-20215283": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702130_201923-07-2019889": "DENIED", + "Bail_3399_201909-07-20193777": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3300776_201905-09-20195744": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_171_202006-03-2020242": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1091_202123-03-20213597": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702167_201924-06-20191856": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_596_202027-02-2020580": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_296_202014-02-20204155": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_896_202109-03-20213976": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3301364_201903-10-20195189": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702449_201905-07-20191566": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_113_202007-03-2020210": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4703766_201924-10-20191702": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1256_202106-04-2021151": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4601490_201904-12-2019637": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4701415_201908-05-20192771": "DENIED", + "Bail_4600767_201923-10-20191728": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4601987_201903-01-20202884": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_294_202014-02-20204154": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1107_202015-06-20201583": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1761_202017-07-20201026": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_843_202106-03-2021999": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4601695_201921-01-20202218": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_628_202112-02-20211760": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1044_202122-03-20213625": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3303106_201919-12-20193855": "DENIED", + "Bail_4601848_201913-12-2019390": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_826_202104-03-20214151": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_702_202013-07-20201076": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_787_202027-05-20202025": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2729_201903-06-20194306": "DENIED", + "Bail_4701602_201920-05-20192471": "DENIED", + "Bail_2100050_201928-05-20195652": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_482_202108-02-20215021": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4600905_201922-11-20191042": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3302009_201901-11-20194868": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1265_202017-06-20203126": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_913_202010-07-20201137": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4701800_201904-06-20192076": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1320_202029-06-20201374": "DENIED", + "Bail_3301705_201917-10-20195009": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3302293_201914-11-20194756": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2003_202025-08-20202085": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1656_202012-06-20203179": "DENIED", + "Bail_675_202011-02-20201243": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_234_201928-11-20199": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3301403_201911-10-20195092": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1059_202119-03-20213713": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_314_202020-02-2020739": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_422_201917-12-201915": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_104_201905-07-201945": "DENIED", + "Bail_4602072_201914-02-20201027": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1620_202030-05-20203276": "DENIED", + "Bail_4703724_201905-10-20192635": "DENIED", + "Bail_528_202007-02-20201519": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_871_202108-03-20214025": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2045_202026-08-20202055": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_308_202028-02-2020497": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1434_202025-06-20201459": "GRANTED", + "Bail_704_202025-02-2020644": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702396_201924-07-2019844": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3345_202028-10-20201605": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_694_202003-03-20203358": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4602036_201906-01-20202757": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3328_202021-10-20201746": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4703733_201915-10-20192371": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1629_202030-06-20201346": "DENIED", + "Bail_3302012_201901-11-20194871": "GRANTED", + "Bail_76_202022-01-20202166": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2783_201906-06-20194259": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_86_202118-01-20212739": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_751_202101-03-20214265": "GRANTED", + "Bail_197_202021-01-20202207": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3540_201918-07-20193520": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2813_202031-10-20201491": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_819_202024-08-2020100": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1011_202112-03-2021849": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_624_202119-02-20214552": "DENIED", + "Bail_2875_201912-06-20194193": "DENIED", + "Bail_4702820_201930-07-2019689": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_730_202126-02-20214312": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_30_202112-01-20212891": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_432_202105-02-20215088": "DENIED", + "Bail_4601674_201907-12-2019568": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1327_202123-03-2021526": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_710_202003-03-20203373": "DENIED", + "Bail_3302915_201907-12-20194465": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702089_201924-06-20191848": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1208_202014-07-20201046": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702065_201904-07-20191618": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_306_202121-01-20212600": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1237_202125-03-2021406": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702541_201925-07-2019799": "DENIED", + "Bail_4703522_201924-09-20192922": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702224_201902-07-20191699": "DENIED", + "Bail_123_202014-01-20202446": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2796_202006-10-20202292": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4601108_201904-01-20202797": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1417_202127-04-202110": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702344_201912-07-20191277": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1296_202012-06-20201635": "DENIED", + "Bail_4601395_201920-11-20191133": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1298_202107-04-20213346": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2100043_201925-05-20195673": "DENIED", + "Bail_4601001_201906-11-20191468": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_565_202110-02-20211881": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_7_201902-07-201960": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_838_202013-03-2020147": "GRANTED", + "Bail_539_202015-02-2020940": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_318_201915-10-2019141": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_156_202005-03-2020295": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4701643_201925-05-20192342": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_519_202025-02-20203721": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4703219_201918-10-20192028": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_157_202007-03-2020212": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_481_202020-02-2020747": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3771_202008-12-2020508": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_541_202115-02-20214716": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_216_202027-02-2020556": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1049_202027-05-20203312": "DENIED", + "Bail_3300495_201920-08-20193051": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702366_201902-07-20191706": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702214_201909-07-20191427": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1295_202016-06-20203141": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_804_202124-02-20211407": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2395_201920-05-20194626": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1688_202028-07-20202671": "DENIED", + "Bail_4600762_201914-11-20191307": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_191_202118-01-20215739": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3471_202007-12-2020530": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4701433_201928-05-20192273": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3327_202005-11-20201352": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_605_202004-03-2020353": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2498_201922-05-20194559": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4601917_201919-12-2019132": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_898_202027-05-20202027": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4601336_201904-12-2019630": "DENIED", + "Bail_4703112_201921-08-2019219": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4600630_201921-10-20191822": "DENIED", + "Bail_4600693_201914-08-2020450": "DENIED", + "Bail_4702225_201902-07-20191700": "DENIED", + "Bail_65_202004-01-20202795": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1705_202006-07-20201230": "DENIED", + "Bail_4702042_201922-06-20191869": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4701682_201927-05-20192311": "DENIED", + "Bail_4703033_201906-09-20193506": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_595_202103-03-20211153": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1842_202028-07-2020923": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2100058_201901-06-20195577": "DENIED", + "Bail_84_202026-06-20203397": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_59_202021-01-2020101": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2291_201913-05-20194817": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3387_202009-11-20201217": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2262_202005-10-20202334": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3019_202008-10-20202206": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3849_201901-08-20193246": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3403_202012-11-20201065": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2377_201916-05-20194731": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1000_202001-06-20201987": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_416_202013-03-2020126": "GRANTED", + "Bail_535_202005-02-20201637": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1505_202025-08-202067": "DENIED", + "Bail_4701893_201921-06-20191885": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_526_202118-02-20211645": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_363_202020-02-20203830": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_214_201917-10-201923": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2748_201904-06-20194278": "DENIED", + "Bail_172_202029-02-2020447": "GRANTED", + "Bail_187_202013-01-20202504": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_554_202122-02-20211506": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1596_202022-05-20203361": "DENIED", + "Bail_4703670_201909-10-20192552": "DENIED", + "Bail_4601637_201922-01-20202186": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1253_202106-04-20213369": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702053_201910-06-20192010": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_631_202028-02-20203502": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1106_202006-06-20201847": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_301_202128-01-20215468": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2809_202005-10-20202340": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_317_202014-02-20204174": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3301429_201905-10-20195144": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_410_202129-01-20212342": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_609_202002-06-20201962": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_617_202028-02-20203493": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3563_202027-11-2020762": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1553_202009-07-20201189": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_272_202013-02-20204210": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1_202001-02-202062": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_406_202018-02-20203968": "DENIED", + "Bail_3301574_201905-10-20195148": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3612_202003-12-2020653": "DENIED", + "Bail_502_202028-02-2020477": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1477_202030-06-20201333": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_642_202013-03-2020136": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1330_202007-08-2020634": "DENIED", + "Bail_4703537_201913-09-20193350": "GRANTED", + "Bail_63_202004-01-20202794": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2859_202007-10-20202242": "DENIED", + "Bail_4601304_201922-11-20191053": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_990_202020-03-20202969": "GRANTED", + "Bail_674_202028-01-20201981": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702109_201915-06-20191958": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702463_201916-07-20191155": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2871_202003-10-20202379": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3046_202015-10-20202020": "DENIED", + "Bail_4701994_201929-06-20191745": "DENIED", + "Bail_4701616_201907-06-20192023": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1004_202117-03-20213796": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_839_202115-03-20213871": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2223_201908-05-20194893": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_448_202029-02-2020463": "DENIED", + "Bail_3618_201925-07-20193359": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3325_202020-10-20201793": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_504_202025-02-20203708": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1855_202007-10-20202232": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3372_202003-11-20201430": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3302981_201911-12-20194368": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_627_202003-03-2020416": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1355_202120-04-20213218": "DENIED", + "Bail_4601569_201928-01-20201982": "DENIED", + "Bail_4701483_201908-05-20192778": "DENIED", + "Bail_4703229_201929-08-201940": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1696_202031-07-20202609": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4601774_201928-01-20201983": "GRANTED", + "Bail_163_202022-01-20202171": "GRANTED", + "Bail_449_202021-01-20202215": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4701387_201908-05-20192766": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702571_201901-08-2019617": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_515_202003-06-20201934": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2312_201913-05-20194823": "DENIED", + "Bail_4701803_201906-06-20192048": "DENIED", + "Bail_4601764_201924-12-201919": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_948_202115-03-20213887": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4601820_201917-01-20202368": "DENIED", + "Bail_4703538_201921-09-20193010": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1407_202029-06-20202955": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_209_202012-02-20204266": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_619_202125-02-20211346": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4601703_201903-12-2019693": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_319_202122-02-20211499": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3300284_201907-08-20193161": "DENIED", + "Bail_4601766_201903-01-20202867": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1393_202108-04-202189": "GRANTED", + "Bail_388_202018-01-20202319": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4601974_201908-01-20202654": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4601748_201911-12-2019456": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_8_201902-07-201961": "DENIED", + "Bail_4703233_201925-09-20192875": "DENIED", + "Bail_579_202023-01-20202137": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3300293_201908-08-20193132": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_751_202005-03-20203225": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_117_201910-07-201930": "DENIED", + "Bail_3301703_201919-10-20194978": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4033_202006-01-20213062": "DENIED", + "Bail_748_202011-02-20201247": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2724_201903-06-20194302": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_787_202102-03-20214215": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_178_202118-01-20215736": "DENIED", + "Bail_3303022_201912-12-20194354": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2196_202019-08-2020300": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4047_202022-12-202059": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_175_202112-02-20211747": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_864_202108-03-20214022": "GRANTED", + "Bail_433_202025-02-2020635": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3300859_201913-09-20195628": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3728_202015-12-2020226": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_984_202029-06-20201361": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_570_202117-02-20214676": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1861_202010-08-20202457": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702092_201917-06-20191931": "DENIED", + "Bail_4701534_201927-05-20192308": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_730_202123-02-20211465": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_283_201925-09-2019187": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_899_202017-03-20203057": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3887_202016-12-2020203": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2074_202014-08-2020500": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3300493_201920-08-20193050": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1163_202122-03-2021563": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_74_202013-02-20201119": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_387_202102-02-20215234": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_968_202108-03-2021956": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_270_202013-02-20204208": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_478_202020-02-2020745": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4701392_201916-05-20192562": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1424_202029-07-2020878": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1714_202017-08-2020404": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_429_202018-02-2020859": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3302956_201910-12-20194391": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_150_202119-01-20212692": "DENIED", + "Bail_4601388_201928-11-2019839": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_337_202015-02-20204110": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_679_202005-03-20203221": "DENIED", + "Bail_3300765_201903-09-20195779": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2010_202024-08-20202136": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4701240_201914-05-20192617": "DENIED", + "Bail_4703345_201931-08-20193720": "DENIED", + "Bail_3303081_201919-12-20193843": "GRANTED", + "Bail_165_202028-01-20201942": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1012_202118-03-2021681": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3302349_201918-11-20194707": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4701368_201904-05-20192864": "DENIED", + "Bail_4701499_201903-06-20192101": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_544_202025-02-2020673": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3302095_201911-11-20194781": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1116_202124-03-20213574": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4600977_201931-10-20191614": "DENIED", + "Bail_4701552_201916-05-20192570": "DENIED", + "Bail_4601814_201917-01-20202367": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3665_202001-12-2020728": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4701816_201927-05-20192319": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_382_202017-02-20204070": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_995_202117-03-20213789": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1810_202010-08-2020596": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702257_201927-06-20191801": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_967_202015-06-20201581": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1597_202026-05-20203347": "DENIED", + "Bail_4701892_201915-06-20191945": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3054_202023-10-20201658": "DENIED", + "Bail_4601578_201927-11-2019893": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_601_202122-02-20211510": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1824_202014-08-2020485": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_177_202011-02-20201262": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1548_202031-07-2020835": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1699_202020-07-20202741": "DENIED", + "Bail_3300957_201916-09-20195409": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_183_202120-01-20212648": "DENIED", + "Bail_4600586_201909-10-20192540": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1616_202028-05-20203292": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_836_202118-03-2021676": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3301304_201910-10-20195103": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1481_202021-07-2020951": "DENIED", + "Bail_2100318_201909-12-20195987": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4601049_201925-10-20191661": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4601241_201913-11-20191378": "DENIED", + "Bail_179_202026-02-2020592": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_812_202006-03-20203200": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1262_202102-04-2021263": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3825_202011-12-2020445": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_335_202108-02-20211961": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4601455_201907-12-2019560": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4600654_201904-10-20192658": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_392_202018-02-20203962": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4601733_201904-12-2019652": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_572_202117-02-20214677": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1715_202010-07-20201149": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3628_202018-11-20201030": "DENIED", + "Bail_85_202020-01-20202249": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_442_202122-02-20211500": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702649_201923-07-2019906": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1781_202007-08-2020641": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_505_202025-02-20203709": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_456_202111-02-20211822": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4703298_201916-09-20193202": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_655_202122-02-20214480": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3330_202002-11-20201460": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_18_202104-01-20216067": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_386_202018-02-2020855": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3302874_201907-12-20194446": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702335_201909-07-20191432": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_671_202104-03-20211088": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4601020_201905-11-20191507": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1229_202026-06-20201409": "DENIED", + "Bail_4703725_201925-09-20192886": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_11_202003-01-2020170": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1570_202013-07-20201102": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3434_202006-11-20201329": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702908_201916-08-2019337": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_182_202017-02-2020900": "DENIED", + "Bail_4703312_201911-09-20193420": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_76_202012-03-202027": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_723_202005-06-20201882": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3301031_201918-09-20195354": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_13_202007-02-202045": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1577_202020-06-20201532": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4701878_201906-06-20192049": "DENIED", + "Bail_4601195_201915-11-20191280": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_604_202118-02-20214600": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_368_202026-02-2020603": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_675_202118-02-20211657": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_284_202013-03-2020121": "GRANTED", + "Bail_9000422_201909-01-20202614": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_713_202104-03-20211092": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_845_202124-02-20211410": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2993_202007-11-20201258": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_573_202108-02-20211970": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702250_201902-07-20191705": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3457_202009-11-20201222": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3301876_201923-10-20194915": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_529_202025-02-20203730": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3301322_201901-10-20195212": "DENIED", + "Bail_555_202010-02-20201311": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_866_202108-03-2021950": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4701279_201907-05-20192804": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2848_202008-10-20202197": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_61_202010-02-20204431": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_953_202027-05-20202031": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_514_202112-02-20211758": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_300_201904-10-2019165": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1402_202026-06-20201417": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_326_202015-02-20204105": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1251_202106-04-20213367": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3141_202006-11-20201314": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1174_202101-04-20213487": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_399_201904-12-201949": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_105_202111-01-20215902": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3096_202017-10-20201942": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4601498_201925-11-2019970": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3090_202006-11-20201312": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_135_202007-02-20201532": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4703753_201915-10-20192372": "GRANTED", + "Bail_279_202024-01-20202053": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702188_201915-07-20191197": "DENIED", + "Bail_4702715_201927-07-2019722": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_521_202026-02-20203610": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_711_202125-02-20211352": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_313_202128-01-20215477": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702550_201912-09-20193376": "DENIED", + "Bail_4600899_201905-11-20191500": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_364_201915-11-201976": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_911_202115-03-20213872": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_341_202018-03-202039": "GRANTED", + "Bail_83_202003-02-20201719": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4703281_201912-09-20193385": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1048_202027-05-20203311": "DENIED", + "Bail_4701467_201929-05-20192242": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1884_202006-08-20202538": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_202_202011-02-20204370": "DENIED", + "Bail_3301036_201918-09-20195358": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1530_202018-08-2020347": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2670_201930-05-20194379": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1684_202003-07-20201297": "DENIED", + "Bail_4701537_201915-05-20192592": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1625_202030-06-20201345": "DENIED", + "Bail_4702143_201924-06-20191852": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_94_202130-01-20212299": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1259_202016-06-20201570": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4049_202022-12-202061": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2365_201916-05-20194720": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2242_202013-08-2020562": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_61_202118-01-20212733": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1811_202021-07-2020962": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4703132_201919-08-2019309": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3523_202005-12-2020561": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4703015_201919-08-2019303": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_525_202110-02-20214903": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_70_202007-01-20213005": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1886_202031-07-2020851": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3302695_201929-11-20194577": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4601827_201910-01-20202567": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_618_202028-07-2020912": "DENIED", + "Bail_4703672_201921-09-20193018": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4600930_201915-11-20191266": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_586_202016-03-2020102": "DENIED", + "Bail_4601347_201904-12-2019632": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_653_202123-02-20211456": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3301700_201919-10-20194976": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_31_202027-02-2020547": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_622_202119-02-20214550": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_198_202011-02-20204367": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3029_202003-11-20201412": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3511_202004-12-2020601": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2182_202021-08-2020165": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3861_201903-08-20193203": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_913_202112-03-20213910": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1203_202015-06-20203161": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_297_202024-02-2020685": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_929_202004-06-20201915": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_384_202102-02-20215231": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2068_202004-08-2020819": "DENIED", + "Bail_2614_201929-05-20194417": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1032_202125-03-2021396": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1032_202002-06-20201965": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_357_202005-03-2020301": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4703106_201909-09-20193443": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4703304_201903-10-20192696": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1659_202013-07-20201106": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2020_202029-07-2020887": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1615_202014-07-20201053": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1475_202107-04-2021125": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_97_201905-07-201944": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3302270_201914-11-20194755": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_124_202120-01-20212643": "DENIED", + "Bail_3300204_201903-08-20193206": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4602035_201903-01-20202885": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1550_202017-07-20202763": "DENIED", + "Bail_4703138_201925-09-20192873": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1962_202005-08-2020737": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_433_202115-03-2021800": "DENIED", + "Bail_4701678_201922-05-20192418": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_79_202125-01-20212473": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4601158_201906-11-20191476": "DENIED", + "Bail_2795_201907-06-20194231": "DENIED", + "Bail_4702277_201909-07-20191429": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4600635_201907-12-2019545": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_169_202015-02-2020981": "DENIED", + "Bail_4701338_201904-05-20192861": "DENIED", + "Bail_4703411_201918-09-20193127": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1330_202124-03-2021473": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_313_202118-02-20211630": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4601110_201929-11-2019791": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1788_202026-08-202033": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3467_202025-11-2020831": "DENIED", + "Bail_11775_202013-08-20203383": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2989_201924-06-20194079": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3301360_201903-10-20195185": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4701352_201901-05-20192958": "DENIED", + "Bail_4703680_201901-11-20191585": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_106_202108-01-20212980": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1277_202107-04-20213334": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3302063_201906-11-20194799": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702558_201917-07-20191107": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_79_202026-02-2020596": "DENIED", + "Bail_3303020_201912-12-20194353": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3066_202005-10-20202351": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702812_201905-08-2019541": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_977_202116-03-2021770": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1069_202006-07-20201211": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_908_202017-03-20203065": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1892_202014-08-2020492": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_205_202020-02-2020727": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_183_202119-01-20215705": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_495_202122-01-20215594": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1095_202112-03-2021855": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4700876_201902-05-20192924": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_842_202012-03-20203133": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_144_202006-02-20201608": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_720_202125-02-20214364": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3302497_201921-11-20194654": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_477_202106-02-20212016": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_440_202110-02-20211873": "DENIED", + "Bail_4601368_201930-11-2019755": "DENIED", + "Bail_4702565_201924-07-2019854": "DENIED", + "Bail_4703748_201917-10-20192162": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1517_202006-08-2020668": "DENIED", + "Bail_4702269_201901-07-20191731": "DENIED", + "Bail_4703172_201928-08-201965": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_518_202123-02-20211446": "DENIED", + "Bail_3302076_201907-11-20194788": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_439_202019-02-2020811": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702919_201903-08-2019568": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3302252_201914-11-20194750": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_722_202105-03-20211045": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1888_202019-08-2020288": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4075_202006-01-20213066": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702406_201910-07-20191376": "DENIED", + "Bail_11774_202013-08-20203382": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2003_202017-08-2020415": "DENIED", + "Bail_4600972_201925-10-20191659": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2478_201921-05-20194603": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_727_202028-01-20212401": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3207_202003-11-20201418": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_77_202023-06-20201495": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_125_202112-01-20215861": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_361_202015-02-2020993": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_838_202120-03-2021593": "DENIED", + "Bail_3369_201908-07-20193799": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702337_201914-08-2019353": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1482_202010-07-20201142": "DENIED", + "Bail_4702483_201911-07-20191313": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_228_202121-01-20215635": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4601476_201923-11-20191013": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_141_202019-02-2020793": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1177_202101-04-20213490": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1061_202122-03-2021551": "GRANTED", + "Bail_232_202022-01-20202174": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4601935_201923-12-201963": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702044_201924-07-2019840": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1119_202011-06-20203191": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_386_202017-02-20204072": "DENIED", + "Bail_127_202020-01-20202251": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_321_202129-01-20215394": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3567_202024-11-2020884": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_274_202013-02-20204211": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1219_202131-03-2021341": "DENIED", + "Bail_4701933_201931-05-20192175": "DENIED", + "Bail_2972_201918-06-20194148": "DENIED", + "Bail_4703620_201909-10-20192551": "DENIED", + "Bail_367_202029-01-20201887": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3583_202027-11-2020763": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3302400_201919-11-20194681": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2067_202004-08-2020818": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3697_202027-11-2020769": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4701815_201908-07-20191461": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_899_202110-03-20213940": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1120_202025-06-20201443": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_111_201908-07-201940": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1549_202017-07-20202762": "DENIED", + "Bail_4702886_201916-08-2019335": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_455_202105-02-20212055": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3351_201909-07-20193769": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4701545_201917-06-20191917": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_145_202007-03-2020211": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2977_202024-11-2020872": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1066_202115-03-2021819": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_767_202125-02-20211353": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4703152_201930-08-20193755": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_581_202010-06-20201692": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1869_202031-07-2020849": "DENIED", + "Bail_4601416_201904-01-20202802": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702910_201928-08-201957": "DENIED", + "Bail_289_202028-01-20201948": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3820_202022-12-202048": "DENIED", + "Bail_3476_201915-07-20193591": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_284_202119-01-20212695": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4701422_201913-05-20192652": "DENIED", + "Bail_3301265_201927-09-20195247": "DENIED", + "Bail_4601737_201924-12-201916": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1445_202006-07-20202909": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3747_202008-12-2020504": "DENIED", + "Bail_4601169_201911-12-2019434": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1538_202014-07-20202785": "DENIED", + "Bail_4703420_201925-09-20192880": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3962_202006-01-20213056": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3064_202017-10-20201941": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_893_202118-03-2021677": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3622_202022-12-202045": "DENIED", + "Bail_4600852_201923-10-20191742": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_339_202130-01-20215326": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1310_202025-06-20201451": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1153_202120-03-2021604": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_58_202021-01-2020100": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_338_202015-02-20204111": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2353_202021-08-2020180": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2116_202021-08-2020162": "DENIED", + "Bail_2473_201921-05-20194598": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_727_202123-02-20211464": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3396_201909-07-20193775": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_409_202110-02-20211871": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_323_202103-02-20212164": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702687_201909-08-2019406": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_212_202029-02-2020454": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_462_202106-02-20215063": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2100359_201924-12-20195824": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702381_201917-07-20191100": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_13_202112-01-20212888": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_116_201910-07-201929": "DENIED", + "Bail_3301032_201918-09-20195355": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_99_202018-03-202013": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3357_202005-11-20201355": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3897_202009-12-2020482": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4601640_201912-12-2019408": "DENIED", + "Bail_4703364_201916-09-20193207": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702678_201922-07-2019945": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1151_202015-06-20203146": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2301_201913-05-20194819": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_85_202003-03-2020386": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3302637_201930-11-20194563": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_714_202119-02-20211588": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_290_201930-09-2019175": "DENIED", + "Bail_4701612_201924-05-20192360": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4703189_201927-09-20192808": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4703749_201909-10-20192559": "DENIED", + "Bail_681_202028-02-2020482": "DENIED", + "Bail_4702562_201927-09-20192806": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_479_202020-02-2020746": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4601955_201907-01-20202713": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_380_202105-02-20212049": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_300_202128-01-20215467": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_371_202012-03-2020166": "GRANTED", + "Bail_422_202003-02-20201732": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_267_202125-01-20215545": "DENIED", + "Bail_2350_201915-05-20194775": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3300636_201927-08-20192999": "DENIED", + "Bail_3812_201901-08-20193239": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_84_202007-03-2020209": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1404_202025-06-20201457": "DENIED", + "Bail_3092_201924-06-20194085": "DENIED", + "Bail_378_202007-02-20201510": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1882_202029-07-2020882": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4701400_201907-05-20192808": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1627_202021-07-20202701": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_716_202013-07-20201077": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1993_202019-08-2020291": "DENIED", + "Bail_4601030_201911-11-20191400": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2851_202005-10-20202342": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_362_202025-02-20203698": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702781_201905-08-2019539": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3301782_201921-10-20194970": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1528_202013-07-20202836": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1862_202010-08-20202458": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4703476_201904-10-20192662": "DENIED", + "Bail_4601124_201915-11-20191277": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_476_202019-06-20201538": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4600715_201911-10-20192447": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_246_202013-02-20201127": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2615_201928-05-20194440": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4703497_201903-10-20192701": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1498_202113-04-202152": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1469_202020-08-2020214": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1535_202030-06-20201341": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3302729_201930-11-20194568": "GRANTED", + "Bail_220_202023-01-20202120": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4601094_201901-11-20191582": "DENIED", + "Bail_4600957_201915-11-20191270": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4600956_201928-11-2019826": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3724_201901-08-20193235": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4701223_201909-05-20192718": "DENIED", + "Bail_4702912_201928-08-201958": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_633_202028-02-20203504": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4701952_201921-06-20191888": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_200_202101-02-20212244": "DENIED", + "Bail_3416_201910-07-20193744": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4703495_201916-10-20192286": "GRANTED", + "Bail_380_202029-01-20201890": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_379_202101-02-20215294": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_543_202025-02-2020672": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3189_202006-10-20202314": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3704_202002-12-2020698": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1041_202001-06-20201992": "DENIED", + "Bail_4701974_201915-06-20191948": "DENIED", + "Bail_3300223_201909-08-20193119": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_359_202017-02-2020914": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3276_202023-10-20201670": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1412_202020-08-2020213": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_639_202028-02-20203510": "DENIED", + "Bail_4601845_201906-01-20202742": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_931_202112-03-2021844": "DENIED", + "Bail_3300779_201905-09-20195746": "GRANTED", + "Bail_522_202005-03-2020285": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4601583_201927-11-2019896": "DENIED", + "Bail_3300497_201920-08-20193053": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4601483_201903-01-20202862": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2100124_201901-07-20195503": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_38_202030-01-20212297": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_720_202005-03-2020311": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4703048_201917-09-20193161": "DENIED", + "Bail_4701898_201915-06-20191946": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_203_202011-02-20204371": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4600743_201910-10-20192503": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4703650_201905-10-20192631": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_915_202010-08-2020589": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1887_202028-07-2020924": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4601762_201920-01-20202274": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1828_202018-08-2020355": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3516_202012-11-20201086": "DENIED", + "Bail_682_202025-02-2020641": "DENIED", + "Bail_4600720_201909-10-20192544": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_891_202122-03-2021549": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702015_201906-06-20192057": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1692_202028-07-20202674": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_354_202017-02-20204049": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_594_202027-02-2020578": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702664_201918-07-20191066": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_548_202118-03-2021670": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_190_202020-02-2020724": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_469_202109-02-20211920": "DENIED", + "Bail_4702340_201918-07-20191054": "DENIED", + "Bail_3302549_201927-11-20194599": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1818_202020-08-2020224": "DENIED", + "Bail_4701063_201913-05-20192651": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3932_202012-01-20212904": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4600879_201916-11-20191229": "DENIED", + "Bail_3303080_201919-12-20193842": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1691_202003-07-20201300": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1497_202013-07-20202818": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4600857_201922-10-20191785": "GRANTED", + "Bail_531_202007-02-20201520": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1364_202006-07-20201213": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3290_202028-10-20201601": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_337_202013-03-2020122": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_151_202113-01-20215833": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_349_202103-02-20212166": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_878_202125-03-2021390": "DENIED", + "Bail_4600597_201909-10-20192541": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_148_202119-01-20212691": "DENIED", + "Bail_3459_201912-07-20193706": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2016_202025-08-20202087": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4600665_201902-11-20191532": "DENIED", + "Bail_4702012_201906-06-20192055": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1148_202131-03-2021337": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4601994_201913-01-20202529": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702701_201930-07-2019685": "GRANTED", + "Bail_608_202015-02-2020948": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4600937_201913-11-20191363": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1118_202122-03-2021560": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1568_202010-08-2020591": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_869_202017-03-20203042": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1655_202012-06-20203178": "DENIED", + "Bail_4600978_201902-11-20191542": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_180_202113-01-20212851": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_898_202017-03-20203056": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1354_202028-07-2020917": "DENIED", + "Bail_4702732_201905-09-20193547": "DENIED", + "Bail_4601400_201920-11-20191136": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_660_202006-03-2020256": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_926_202101-03-20211281": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_983_202108-03-2021957": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1421_202113-04-202146": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1222_202116-03-2021780": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1597_202017-07-20201021": "GRANTED", + "Bail_615_202010-02-20201314": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1250_202017-06-20203120": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4016_202004-01-20213155": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3162_201927-06-20194019": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1138_202013-07-20201084": "DENIED", + "Bail_4701980_201915-06-20191950": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2793_201907-06-20194229": "DENIED", + "Bail_4702469_201922-07-2019936": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4703484_201926-11-2019932": "DENIED", + "Bail_139_202028-01-20201940": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1290_202015-06-20201591": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1687_202028-07-20202670": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4600532_201910-10-20192491": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2549_201925-05-20194484": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_937_202016-06-20201565": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4601815_201902-01-20202932": "DENIED", + "Bail_2183_201903-05-20194966": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_375_202119-02-20211576": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1016_202026-05-20203329": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1197_202006-06-20201860": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702235_201928-06-20191772": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500_202109-02-20214955": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2081_202017-08-2020419": "DENIED", + "Bail_4703768_201926-09-20192845": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4701896_201904-06-20192079": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_579_202003-06-20201935": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_574_202025-02-20203755": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2096_202018-08-2020366": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_709_202102-03-20211220": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3302171_201907-11-20194796": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2263_202005-10-20202335": "DENIED", + "Bail_4702943_201906-08-2019519": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_412_202103-02-20215186": "GRANTED", + "Bail_124_202014-01-20202447": "DENIED", + "Bail_246_202014-01-20202450": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_105_202107-01-20213010": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4703160_201926-08-2019131": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1667_202013-07-20201109": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_663_202122-02-20214487": "DENIED", + "Bail_3301510_201911-10-20195095": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3301394_201904-10-20195157": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_303_202128-01-20215470": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102_202018-03-202016": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702696_201902-08-2019582": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3302224_201913-11-20194779": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_781_202125-02-20211354": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1603_202026-05-20203352": "DENIED", + "Bail_4702906_201920-08-2019259": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_60_202116-01-20212776": "DENIED", + "Bail_4701343_201916-05-20192560": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_129_202118-01-20212741": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702031_201914-06-20191967": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1276_202014-07-20201047": "DENIED", + "Bail_4702944_201908-08-2019451": "DENIED", + "Bail_175_202020-01-20202255": "DENIED", + "Bail_3302827_201909-12-20194403": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_302_202128-01-20215469": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3302169_201907-11-20194794": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4701997_201907-06-20192034": "DENIED", + "Bail_4703546_201925-09-20192881": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4600940_201914-11-20191312": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3601_202021-11-2020953": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_451_202102-02-20212213": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_393_202102-02-20215237": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4703241_201917-09-20193164": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4600737_201923-10-20191726": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3061_202016-10-20201986": "DENIED", + "Bail_4601330_201928-11-2019833": "DENIED", + "Bail_3300559_201922-08-20193026": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1638_202014-07-20201054": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1864_202010-08-20202460": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_863_202117-03-2021714": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1533_202106-04-2021169": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2100132_201903-07-20195447": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3301058_201919-09-20195334": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_307_202025-02-2020661": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_64_202106-01-20213048": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3776_202026-11-2020810": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4703691_201902-12-2019729": "DENIED", + "Bail_543_202013-02-20201091": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_522_202025-02-20203723": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1068_202006-07-20201210": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1253_202013-07-20201088": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1660_202020-08-2020219": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3790_202027-11-2020773": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4601506_201925-11-2019975": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_106_202111-01-20215903": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4601887_201921-01-20202224": "DENIED", + "Bail_120_202007-01-20202684": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1486_202010-07-20202867": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_534_202110-02-20211878": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_448_202112-02-20211753": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2085_202018-08-2020364": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_856_202106-03-20214073": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4701269_201910-05-20192681": "DENIED", + "Bail_4701450_201909-05-20192727": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2001_202021-08-20202186": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_101_201904-07-201957": "GRANTED", + "Bail_190_202020-02-2020712": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702191_201919-07-20191007": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_575_202123-02-20211450": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_779_202005-03-20203228": "DENIED", + "Bail_3302159_201907-11-20194793": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_547_202102-03-20211214": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2005_202006-08-2020687": "DENIED", + "Bail_4702982_201913-08-2019382": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1210_202124-03-2021465": "GRANTED", + "Bail_382_202024-01-20202058": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2252_202024-08-2020116": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1893_202020-08-2020230": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1045_202027-05-20203308": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_799_202116-03-2021762": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2442_202031-10-20201490": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1903_202013-08-20202414": "DENIED", + "Bail_4701672_201921-05-20192444": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1728_202031-07-20202627": "DENIED", + "Bail_2606_201927-05-20194464": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_259_202104-02-20212098": "DENIED", + "Bail_3303018_201912-12-20194351": "GRANTED", + "Bail_6_202024-12-20193777": "DENIED", + "Bail_3302983_201911-12-20194370": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4701322_201917-05-20192528": "DENIED", + "Bail_3302034_201902-11-20194846": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_423_202002-06-20201957": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4701656_201923-05-20192390": "DENIED", + "Bail_4702785_201909-08-2019412": "DENIED", + "Bail_2262_201909-05-20194872": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2925_202007-10-20202244": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_677_202118-02-20211659": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4600708_201903-12-2019671": "DENIED", + "Bail_3302521_201922-11-20194642": "DENIED", + "Bail_4702948_201906-08-2019523": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4701760_201921-06-20191884": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_460_202125-02-20211338": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1682_202014-07-20201055": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1284_202106-04-20213383": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3205_202003-11-20201417": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_281_202013-03-2020119": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3303076_201919-12-20193839": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_976_202116-03-2021769": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4701794_201919-06-20191905": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1354_202124-03-2021477": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3859_201901-08-20193251": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1108_202015-06-20201584": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2000_202021-08-20202185": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4703739_201901-10-20192741": "DENIED", + "Bail_4702966_201921-08-2019213": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_554_202025-02-2020674": "DENIED", + "Bail_3301548_201914-10-20195073": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3285_202003-11-20201423": "GRANTED", + "Bail_647_202019-02-2020784": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1066_202010-06-20201703": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1687_202003-07-20201299": "DENIED", + "Bail_4601907_201918-12-2019157": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_863_202108-03-20214021": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_328_201918-10-2019131": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1492_202013-08-2020534": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1968_202024-08-2020104": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4600774_201914-11-20191308": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1176_202101-04-20213489": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_80_202115-01-20212816": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_144_202108-01-20215949": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1471_202127-04-202112": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1312_202026-06-20201412": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702228_201909-07-20191428": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3828_202011-12-2020447": "GRANTED", + "Bail_306_202018-01-20202314": "DENIED", + "Bail_4703131_201919-08-2019308": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1331_202116-04-20213234": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3301927_201924-10-20194894": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_953_202018-03-20203019": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3350_202006-11-20201323": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_355_201906-11-201988": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_282_201925-09-2019186": "GRANTED", + "Bail_626_202010-02-20201316": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3302877_201907-12-20194448": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3352_202003-11-20201426": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2408_202020-08-2020254": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_58_202026-02-20203604": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_829_202007-03-20203153": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_419_202116-03-2021757": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_10_202104-01-20213135": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3302371_201919-11-20194677": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_365_202017-02-20204058": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_216_201917-10-201925": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1709_202028-07-20202683": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3334_201905-07-20193845": "DENIED", + "Bail_4601524_201902-12-2019724": "DENIED", + "Bail_2497_201922-05-20194558": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1676_202014-08-2020480": "DENIED", + "Bail_4702999_201921-08-2019216": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1379_202022-06-20201520": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_894_202112-03-20213909": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4043_202006-01-20213063": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4703456_201915-10-20192360": "DENIED", + "Bail_4702138_201929-06-20191748": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1941_201910-05-20194844": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_107_202020-03-20205": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3397_202005-11-20201358": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2100052_201929-05-20195627": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_593_202123-02-20211452": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_118_201910-07-201931": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_179_202112-01-20212898": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4703747_201926-09-20192842": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_900_202017-03-20203058": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_91_202006-02-20201603": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_632_202028-02-20203503": "DENIED", + "Bail_708_202026-06-20201385": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_532_202106-02-20212019": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_604_202110-02-20211885": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_737_202126-02-20214316": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4601036_201905-11-20191508": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3208_202023-11-2020919": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1101_202124-03-2021461": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3301451_201909-10-20195131": "DENIED", + "Bail_4703577_201917-09-20193178": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1422_202107-04-2021118": "DENIED", + "Bail_3301123_201923-09-20195283": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2939_202003-10-20202386": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3303212_201924-12-20193782": "GRANTED", + "Bail_583_202006-01-20202735": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_649_202115-02-20211732": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3300389_201914-08-20193106": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4601029_201902-11-20191544": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1629_202025-08-20202081": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_549_202117-02-20211712": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4601531_201904-12-2019640": "DENIED", + "Bail_4702405_201927-08-201992": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_991_202020-03-20202970": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1951_202029-07-2020886": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1468_202013-07-20202812": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3302290_201915-11-20194736": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3301357_201903-10-20195182": "DENIED", + "Bail_4600868_201922-10-20191786": "DENIED", + "Bail_28_202021-01-20202204": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_253_202017-02-2020907": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_971_202102-03-20211243": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1205_202006-06-20201861": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3302054_201905-11-20194817": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3302295_201915-11-20194738": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_249_202115-02-20211729": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_195_202108-02-20211956": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3301888_201923-10-20194925": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3455_202010-11-20201172": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_708_202118-02-20211664": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1748_202021-07-2020960": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_279_202012-03-2020163": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_37_202004-03-2020329": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3614_202026-11-2020794": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4701762_201917-06-20191919": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1024_202027-05-20202041": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_28_202101-01-20216106": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1848_202013-08-20202393": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_224_202115-03-2021798": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_640_202103-03-20211157": "GRANTED", + "Bail_193_202005-02-20201626": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3302047_201902-11-20194857": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1595_202022-05-20203360": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1689_202017-07-20201024": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_681_202003-03-20203353": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_222_202115-02-20211728": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3773_202026-11-2020807": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3301928_201924-10-20194895": "DENIED", + "Bail_723_202001-02-20201811": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1086_202006-06-20201846": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4703107_201912-09-20193378": "DENIED", + "Bail_4_202029-02-2020446": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4600778_201921-10-20191830": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1000_202117-03-20213794": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_36_202020-02-202043": "DENIED", + "Bail_4701719_201903-06-20192108": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4601687_201923-12-201944": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_58_202018-02-2020839": "DENIED", + "Bail_4600983_201922-10-20191789": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2111_201902-05-20194981": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1427_202023-06-20201502": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1300_202108-04-20213299": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1945_202029-07-2020885": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3781_202008-12-2020510": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4703569_201931-10-20191622": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3502_202005-11-20201363": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_189_202020-02-2020723": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702364_201906-08-2019502": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1885_202029-07-2020883": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4703488_201911-09-20193429": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_41_202014-02-20201045": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4601134_201921-11-20191086": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_66_202118-01-20212735": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2100046_201928-05-20195650": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_748_202123-02-20211468": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3302800_201903-12-20194526": "DENIED", + "Bail_4600773_201921-10-20191829": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_880_202125-03-2021391": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4703182_201920-09-20193043": "DENIED", + "Bail_4702211_201918-06-20191914": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_695_202003-03-20203359": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4701518_201915-05-20192587": "DENIED", + "Bail_3467_201915-07-20193585": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_718_202103-03-20211162": "DENIED", + "Bail_2764_201906-06-20194246": "GRANTED", + "Bail_27_202013-01-20202491": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2100024_201906-05-20195826": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_504_202112-02-20211756": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3300791_201919-09-20195331": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702444_201905-07-20191564": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_438_202105-02-20215094": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_103_201904-07-201959": "DENIED", + "Bail_4702572_201901-08-2019618": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3104_202023-10-20201663": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_339_202015-02-20204112": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_857_202125-02-20211357": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4702148_201927-06-20191794": "DENIED", + "Bail_4703617_201901-10-20192737": "DENIED", + "Bail_3302496_201921-11-20194653": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1464_202009-07-20202883": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3605_201922-07-20193440": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4600855_201921-10-20191835": "DENIED", + "Bail_4601340_201918-11-20191205": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_996_202020-03-20202973": "DENIED", + "Bail_4702681_201901-08-2019623": "DENIED", + "Bail_4702181_201926-06-20191819": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_61_202107-01-20215967": "GRANTED", + "Bail_121_202027-01-20202005": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3840_201901-08-20193241": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1029_202119-03-2021637": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3119_202017-10-20201946": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4701614_201930-05-20192210": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3390_202007-11-20201273": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4601282_201929-11-2019801": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_797_202005-03-20203242": "GRANTED", + "Bail_303_202007-02-20201504": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_87_202115-01-20213349": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1826_201918-06-20192346": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_422_202027-02-2020563": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1983_201916-07-20191619": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2092_202014-08-2020373": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2655_201914-08-2019595": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2725_201916-08-2019511": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2105_201929-06-20192127": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8_202031-01-20201619": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1895_201920-06-20192295": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2511_201919-08-2019407": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1628_201906-06-20192482": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_229_202120-01-20213130": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_761_202115-02-20212031": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1668_201918-06-20192336": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_822_202115-02-20212040": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_581_202110-02-20212118": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4871_201920-12-2019158": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1051_202008-06-20202079": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2091_202006-08-2020536": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4667_201912-12-2019723": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1024_202024-06-20201679": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_955_202004-06-20202163": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2406_201901-08-20191186": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1093_202008-06-20202086": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2429_201909-08-2019717": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_981_202102-03-20215412": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_412_202101-02-20212678": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1244_202015-06-20201937": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_170_202121-01-20213023": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4034_202015-12-2020675": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1574_202101-04-2021369": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2187_202014-08-2020377": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4301_201929-11-20191084": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_380_202022-01-20203288": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1389_202009-07-20201343": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_310_202018-02-2020850": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1358_202123-03-2021669": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1827_201919-06-20192320": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2487_201901-08-20191198": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1924_202018-08-2020267": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1396_202029-06-20201631": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_297_202019-02-2020784": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_565_202019-03-202053": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1954_202021-08-2020136": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1038_202004-06-20202171": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_308_202120-01-20216960": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1835_202020-07-20201019": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1081_202018-06-20201790": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2020_201907-08-2019848": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_207_202115-01-20213370": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_507_202028-02-2020510": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_819_202122-02-20215720": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_171_202022-01-20201892": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102_202014-01-20202232": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1959_201926-06-20192195": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2345_201907-08-2019868": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1207_202116-03-20214882": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_423_202027-02-2020564": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1476_202016-07-20201099": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4876_201923-12-201981": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_930_202017-06-20201826": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2586_201913-08-2019648": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1182_202012-06-20201971": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4197_202006-01-20213673": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_364_202122-01-20216857": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_181_202120-01-20213122": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4505_201929-11-20191117": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1238_202115-03-20211046": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4672_201911-12-2019775": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_775_202003-06-20202176": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1411_202124-03-20214497": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_587_202101-02-20212688": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1133_202109-03-20215104": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_901_202123-02-20211739": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2209_202019-08-2020237": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1476_202131-03-20214369": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_500_202012-03-2020266": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1163_202112-03-20214980": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1901_201920-06-20192297": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1712_202105-04-2021291": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_122_202006-02-20201424": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_93_202006-02-20201420": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_681_202017-03-2020148": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4934_201902-01-20202634": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1416_202014-07-20201208": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_891_202025-06-20201646": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1997_201915-07-20191668": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1712_201903-06-20192556": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1075_202009-06-20202049": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_240_202122-01-20212938": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_480_202006-03-2020348": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4704_201919-12-2019212": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1220_202003-07-20201536": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1033_202103-03-20215334": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3784_202004-02-20212494": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_440_202129-01-20212775": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1967_202010-08-20202799": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3857_202021-01-20213052": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_228_202115-01-20217242": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_363_202024-01-20201807": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3750_202015-12-2020659": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_623_202110-02-20212122": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_974_202004-06-20202167": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2033_201925-06-20192222": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1717_202029-07-2020667": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_455_202013-03-2020198": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1852_202027-07-2020781": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_852_202002-06-20202210": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_229_202120-01-20216949": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1551_201904-06-20192504": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1726_202020-07-20201012": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1723_202015-07-20201182": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_60_202005-02-20203088": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_964_202112-03-20211076": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2003_202029-07-2020690": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1876_201918-06-20192351": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2851_201929-08-201916": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2777_201919-08-2019417": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1082_202108-03-20215159": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_269_202021-01-20201970": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1976_201906-08-2019911": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_202_202013-02-20201018": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1662_201911-06-20192402": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_339_202031-01-20201593": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_748_202123-02-20211720": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_167_202115-01-20213364": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2542_201926-07-20191326": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_108_202008-01-20202475": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1700_201904-06-20192516": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_51_202028-02-2020484": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1504_202003-07-20201558": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_891_202101-03-20215471": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1421_202003-07-20201544": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1587_202020-07-20201005": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2514_201902-08-20191127": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_826_202122-02-20215727": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1317_202023-06-20201722": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1188_202012-06-20201974": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2064_202025-08-202089": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1686_202017-07-20201061": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1813_202022-07-2020933": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_207_202029-06-20203409": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2518_201902-08-20191129": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2411_201901-08-20191188": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4815_201916-12-2019446": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2166_202021-08-2020145": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2332_201902-08-20191109": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_885_202124-02-20211676": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1172_202115-03-20214931": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4772_201916-12-2019437": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2046_202021-08-2020139": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_976_202102-03-20215408": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_296_202027-01-20201726": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2413_201908-08-2019784": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1669_202014-07-20201229": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3681_202015-12-2020653": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_985_202002-06-20202221": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1977_201903-07-20192072": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_367_202021-01-20203326": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_45_202105-01-20217486": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4473_201918-01-20202024": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3888_202021-12-2020292": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_88_202118-01-20213247": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_319_202027-01-20201731": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_152_202108-01-20217360": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_501_202101-02-20216594": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4989_201913-01-20202293": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_201_202115-01-20213368": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4544_201905-12-2019907": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1633_202131-03-2021437": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1874_201921-06-20192267": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2968_201921-08-2019334": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_391_202027-02-2020558": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2012_202010-08-2020432": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2253_201915-07-20191701": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_626_202020-03-202019": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4963_201924-12-201935": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1431_202003-07-20201545": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4510_201929-11-20191121": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1770_202022-07-20203078": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_290_202012-02-20201099": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_999_202002-06-20202224": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4099_202021-12-2020315": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2447_201916-08-2019495": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_148_202011-02-20201116": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2546_201907-08-2019874": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1978_201920-06-20192303": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4837_201904-01-20202565": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1767_201921-06-20192260": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1031_202103-03-20215332": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_265_202129-01-20212756": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_679_202109-03-20211168": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_153_202118-01-20213256": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_655_202109-02-20216173": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_43_202025-02-2020681": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2180_201907-08-2019857": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_395_202025-02-2020710": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_597_202105-02-20212410": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2276_201902-08-20191099": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1651_202105-04-2021286": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1381_202124-03-2021598": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1451_202002-07-20201589": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2536_201905-08-20191002": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_935_202122-02-20211814": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1971_201919-07-20191529": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1786_201918-06-20192341": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1194_202115-03-20214949": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_739_202021-01-20213047": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1875_201918-06-20192350": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2699_201916-08-2019506": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1520_202010-07-20201307": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_401_202127-01-20212869": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1089_202108-03-20215165": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4059_202019-01-20213196": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_254_202022-01-20201909": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2748_201920-08-2019369": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_420_202101-02-20212679": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_98_202006-02-20201421": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_569_202105-02-20212406": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_214_202012-02-20201086": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1817_201919-06-20192319": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2936_201928-08-201987": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_958_202102-03-20215396": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1899_202013-08-2020382": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_616_202110-02-20212120": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_918_202125-02-20215511": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_800_202120-02-20215763": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_774_202119-02-20215794": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_144_202119-01-20213179": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1706_201904-06-20192519": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1651_201903-06-20192548": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_24_202006-02-20201414": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1769_202022-07-20203077": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_692_202110-02-20216100": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2050_201916-07-20191620": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1236_202116-03-2021981": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2903_201921-08-2019331": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_203_202022-01-20201898": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4977_201902-01-20202637": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_250_202015-02-2020938": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2274_201905-08-2019980": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_166_202022-01-20201891": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2302_201902-08-20191102": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_843_202018-03-2020117": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_72_202118-01-20213246": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_881_202026-05-20202312": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_96_202010-01-20202400": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_471_202028-02-2020503": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2330_201902-08-20191108": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4169_202016-03-20211002": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2623_201901-08-20191210": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_304_202120-01-20216956": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1397_202002-07-20201582": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2929_201928-08-201984": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1726_201919-06-20192312": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2480_201926-07-20191321": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_313_202103-02-20212538": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1184_202012-06-20201972": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1664_202014-07-20201224": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1961_202025-08-202085": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4213_202024-12-202062": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_692_202009-06-20202035": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2633_201913-08-2019660": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1142_202029-06-20201623": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_701_202020-03-202026": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4864_201923-12-201980": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_307_202027-01-20201728": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_171_202121-01-20213024": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1011_202102-03-20211513": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1702_202028-07-2020715": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_29_202005-02-20201461": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2610_201909-08-2019730": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_898_202029-05-20202289": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_291_202101-02-20212671": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2181_201925-07-20191349": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4136_202022-12-2020228": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1140_202117-03-2021910": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1319_202117-03-2021939": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_426_202027-02-2020566": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1846_201907-06-20192469": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1171_202015-06-20201925": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1287_202119-03-20214654": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_473_202012-03-2020262": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_689_202013-07-20201256": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_31_202002-01-20203659": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_866_202119-02-20211916": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1564_202105-04-20214164": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1272_202118-03-20214727": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_512_202102-02-20212632": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_80_202115-01-20213347": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1573_202016-07-20201105": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1792_202017-08-2020313": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_786_202119-02-20215801": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4955_201924-12-201931": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4402_201929-11-20191101": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4561_201909-12-2019840": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_207_202013-02-20201019": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1888_201917-06-20192370": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2228_202021-08-2020149": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_301_202120-01-20216953": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1757_202022-07-2020928": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3112_202005-01-20213726": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1755_202105-04-2021294": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_494_202012-03-2020264": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2911_201927-08-2019158": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1806_201924-06-20192233": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1465_202131-03-20214359": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_897_202124-02-20215570": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_296_202127-01-20212851": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2022_202007-08-2020475": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1425_202125-03-20214420": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_862_202015-12-2020644": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2906_201927-08-2019157": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_10_202107-01-20213580": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2758_201907-08-2019886": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_27_202120-01-20213104": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4186_202020-01-20213141": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_213_202115-01-20217234": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4925_201924-12-201919": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2323_201917-07-20191592": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_124_202110-02-20212111": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_732_202013-07-20201257": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1951_201926-06-20192194": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_40_202004-02-20201506": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4373_202007-01-20213617": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_249_202014-01-20203463": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4345_201911-12-2019750": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1927_202028-07-2020736": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2611_201905-08-20191012": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_172_202112-01-20217297": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1850_201910-06-20192432": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2453_201927-07-20191298": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_10_202005-02-20201453": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_785_202020-03-202034": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4949_201903-01-20202605": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1476_202106-04-2021234": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2890_201929-08-201918": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1042_202104-03-20215277": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1746_201904-06-20192522": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1989_202010-08-20202816": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4918_201912-02-20201046": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1829_202023-07-2020883": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1379_202123-03-20214573": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4691_201912-12-2019726": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_99_202106-01-20217440": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3960_202024-12-202040": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_390_202129-01-20212764": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1647_202016-07-20203221": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1538_202003-07-20201565": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_169_202024-01-20201774": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3954_202017-12-2020480": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1269_202015-06-20201940": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1652_202108-04-20213975": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1313_202116-03-2021990": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4602_201918-12-2019258": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1283_202124-03-20214472": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2143_201909-08-2019706": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_188_202027-01-20201718": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1481_202015-07-20201162": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_821_202029-05-20202277": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2275_201916-07-20191643": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4353_201905-12-2019902": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1554_202105-04-20214157": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_245_202022-01-20201905": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4753_201909-12-2019855": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4835_201920-12-2019148": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_181_202012-02-20201076": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2089_202020-08-2020177": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2783_201920-08-2019373": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_579_202006-03-2020363": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_676_202019-03-202055": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_481_202026-02-2020644": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2280_201905-08-2019981": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4118_202008-01-20213530": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1964_201921-06-20192279": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4101_202022-12-2020225": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_132_202014-02-2020958": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7_202013-02-2020991": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1019_202012-06-20201958": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2956_201929-08-201930": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2632_201916-08-2019497": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2734_201916-08-2019512": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4535_201909-12-2019838": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3675_202022-12-2020197": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1981_201927-06-20192172": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_710_202110-02-20212147": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2970_201921-08-2019335": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3950_202022-12-2020214": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5007_201906-01-20202539": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1385_202006-07-20201476": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_539_202013-03-2020209": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2339_202025-08-2020103": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4883_201919-12-2019226": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1526_202014-07-20201214": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3902_202021-12-2020294": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2007_202127-04-20211": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1603_202112-04-20213923": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2020_202013-08-20202717": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_411_202127-01-20216736": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_467_202027-02-2020572": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1718_201906-06-20192484": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_430_202127-01-20216753": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1452_202023-07-2020871": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1573_202105-04-20214171": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_917_202018-06-20201786": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2800_201919-08-2019421": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_42_202005-02-20201464": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_677_202110-02-20216086": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1933_201901-07-20192107": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1875_202017-07-20201077": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1402_202006-07-20201478": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_902_202124-02-20215575": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_909_202003-06-20202183": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2465_201901-08-20191194": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_498_202104-02-20212479": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_484_202029-01-20203171": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4662_201912-12-2019721": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_4371_201927-11-201999": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1078_202011-06-20201995": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1137_202015-06-20201916": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3868_202021-12-2020286": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_647_202017-03-2020142": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2210_201920-08-2019359": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_176_202012-02-20201075": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4365_202015-01-20213389": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_607_202106-02-20216285": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4697_201911-12-2019784": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4188_201928-11-20191153": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_138_202004-02-20201526": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1162_202112-03-20214979": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1253_202013-07-20201261": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_335_202025-02-2020697": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1684_201903-06-20192554": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2257_201915-07-20191705": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2313_201902-08-20191105": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_142_202121-01-20213020": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_867_202112-03-20211070": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2886_201928-08-201977": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1583_202016-07-20201107": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_976_202103-03-20211446": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_39_202006-02-20201415": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2254_201915-07-20191702": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1281_202022-06-20201743": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2021_202007-08-2020474": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4929_201903-01-20202604": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3039_201927-08-2019175": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1672_202015-07-20201174": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2063_202014-08-2020371": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_842_202026-05-20202310": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1258_202116-03-2021982": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1788_202116-04-202128": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2044_202013-08-2020392": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1467_202124-03-2021614": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_312_202104-02-20212464": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_161_202115-01-20217178": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2121_201916-07-20191629": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_911_202124-02-20215583": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2464_201929-07-20191273": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4678_201911-12-2019777": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_248_202022-01-20201908": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1952_201921-06-20192277": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_162_202022-01-20201890": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_103_202005-10-2020436": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_552_202105-02-20212404": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_520_202012-03-2020273": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_384_202129-01-20212761": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_65_202105-01-20217505": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2316_201902-08-20191106": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2201_201919-07-20191546": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4983_201902-01-20202639": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_508_202013-03-2020202": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2255_201915-07-20191703": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4537_201906-12-2019885": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1006_202009-06-20202046": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_728_202115-02-20215967": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1844_201927-06-20192163": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1860_202027-07-2020786": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_712_202019-03-202061": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_381_202022-01-20203289": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2815_201919-08-2019424": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1483_202101-04-20214279": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_372_202018-02-2020856": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1117_202109-03-20215080": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2157_202026-08-202020": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_297_202024-01-20201798": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2812_201927-08-2019147": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1495_202002-07-20201602": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2113_201908-08-2019775": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2120_202006-08-2020538": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1818_201920-06-20192288": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_173_202017-01-20202079": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1732_201906-06-20192487": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1778_201910-06-20192428": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1851_202024-07-2020845": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1086_202025-06-20201648": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_418_202025-02-2020715": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_518_202012-03-2020272": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_418_202129-01-20212771": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1505_202003-07-20201559": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_165_202017-02-2020889": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1161_202015-06-20201922": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2669_201908-08-2019796": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_251_202023-01-20201846": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1611_202102-04-2021327": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2002_201922-06-20192251": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4888_201923-12-201985": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4862_201902-01-20202627": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1402_202124-03-20214490": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_99_202006-01-20202531": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1033_202016-06-20201873": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2236_201913-08-2019643": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_749_202117-02-20211983": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_15_202005-02-20201456": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1482_202002-07-20201600": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_923_202004-06-20202160": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2283_201902-08-20191100": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_671_202018-03-202098": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1960_202014-08-2020366": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1035_202103-03-20215335": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1596_202007-07-20201442": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_115_202129-01-20216645": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1208_202016-06-20201887": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_886_202030-05-20202260": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4534_201905-12-2019905": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2284_201916-07-20191644": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_732_202115-02-20215970": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_138_202012-02-20202961": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1627_202107-04-20214024": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1928_201925-07-20191344": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1495_202101-04-20214289": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_20_202010-01-20202375": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4243_202021-01-20213054": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3934_202024-12-202039": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1605_202010-07-20201314": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_518_202101-02-20216606": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2065_201926-06-20192201": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_917_202109-03-20211172": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1628_202107-04-20214025": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3937_201931-10-2019124": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4745_201920-12-2019139": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1343_202123-03-20214542": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4256_202007-01-20213597": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1962_201924-06-20192244": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1170_202115-03-20214929": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1154_202016-06-20201882": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5_202004-02-20201500": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_584_202105-02-20212408": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1200_202116-03-20214876": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_158_202127-01-20212839": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1609_202106-04-20214101": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1031_202015-06-20201912": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1255_202018-06-20201804": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_758_202115-02-20212029": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_308_202018-02-2020849": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_904_202001-06-20202240": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_996_202102-03-20215425": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2306_201901-08-20191171": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1395_202007-07-20201425": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_983_202009-06-20202041": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_130_202107-01-20217402": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1219_202017-06-20201838": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_562_202103-02-20216444": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_419_202102-02-20212621": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1909_201913-08-2019640": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1488_202124-03-2021619": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1830_201918-06-20192347": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1185_202115-03-20214940": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_681_202122-02-20211797": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2460_201902-08-20191120": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1011_202005-06-20202138": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2889_201928-08-201978": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_15_202025-02-2020232": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1308_202119-03-20214671": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4371_202018-01-20213290": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1782_201926-06-20192188": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1511_202016-07-20201100": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4479_201917-12-2019334": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1787_202023-07-2020881": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1799_202016-07-20201128": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101_202118-01-20213248": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1012_202102-03-20211514": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_23_202002-01-20203653": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_516_202108-02-20212264": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_195_202022-01-20201895": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2270_201916-07-20191640": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1750_201906-06-20192488": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_531_202012-03-2020275": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4157_202006-01-20213669": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_803_202117-02-20211989": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_150_202025-02-2020684": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_705_202115-02-20212022": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4748_201918-12-2019263": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1_202101-01-20217549": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_526_202107-04-2021171": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_116_202121-01-20213017": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_286_202024-01-20201795": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1939_201926-06-20192192": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_82_202004-02-20201520": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_241_202115-01-20213373": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2942_201929-08-201924": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1155_202112-03-20214973": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1170_202012-06-20201970": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2310_201922-08-2019253": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2705_201916-08-2019508": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_228_202120-01-20213129": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1004_202005-06-20202137": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_550_202110-02-20212115": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1619_202013-07-20201271": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1125_202109-03-20215086": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_303_202024-01-20201801": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_733_202117-02-20215910": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_258_202022-01-20201910": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_239_202022-01-20201904": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1231_202002-07-20201576": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_23_202101-01-20217567": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_794_202119-02-20215809": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_492_202108-02-20212262": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1622_202107-04-20214022": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1349_202124-03-2021597": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4937_201924-12-201926": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3849_202022-12-2020202": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1136_202105-03-20211371": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_77_202005-02-20203096": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1235_202017-06-20201841": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1488_202101-04-20214284": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1311_202025-06-20201659": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_3924_201901-11-2019121": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_187_202023-01-20201839": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_73_202121-01-20213015": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2338_201905-08-2019986": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1124_202109-03-20215085": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4823_201916-12-2019447": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_199_202013-02-20201016": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_763_202117-02-20215921": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_817_202115-02-20212039": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4271_202021-01-20213055": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_17_202101-01-20217561": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_301_202019-02-2020786": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2151_201903-07-20192081": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2091_201915-07-20191679": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_941_202005-06-20202125": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_776_202003-06-20202177": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_263_202024-01-20201788": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_966_202125-03-2021516": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1589_202006-07-20201500": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_80_202010-01-20202393": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1468_202124-03-2021615": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2309_201901-08-20191173": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_712_202115-02-20212025": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1016_202103-03-20211451": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_844_202122-02-20215743": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2809_201917-08-2019469": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2451_201901-08-20191192": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_779_202029-05-20202272": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_456_202013-03-2020199": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1207_202106-04-2021218": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1556_202016-07-20201102": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_130_202012-02-20201067": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_246_202103-02-20212537": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_485_202103-02-20212550": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_129_202015-01-20202168": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_988_202009-06-20202043": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4806_201917-12-2019369": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1755_202021-07-20203135": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_51_202105-01-20217491": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_680_202017-03-2020147": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1579_201924-06-20192229": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_277_202027-01-20201723": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_320_202127-01-20212860": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1190_202117-03-2021916": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1599_201904-06-20192507": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1347_202029-06-20201626": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_295_202127-01-20212850": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_747_202115-02-20215983": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_345_202121-01-20216919": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1934_201917-06-20192373": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1226_202102-04-2021318": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4972_201903-01-20202610": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1908_202013-08-2020384": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_752_202117-02-20215913": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_91_202106-01-20217435": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_908_202003-06-20202182": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1808_202027-07-2020773": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1701_202016-07-20201123": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1105_202010-06-20202022": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4497_201929-11-20191115": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1410_202014-07-20201207": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_230_202115-01-20213371": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_946_202004-06-20202161": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_851_202119-02-20211912": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2943_201928-08-201990": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_416_202127-01-20216741": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_42_202105-01-20217484": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_415_202127-01-20216740": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2277_201914-08-2019584": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_238_202021-01-20201965": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_213_202012-02-20201085": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_862_202123-02-20215654": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1080_202012-06-20201963": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_118_202115-01-20213353": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1118_202018-06-20201796": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_28_202004-02-20203134": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2239_201909-08-2019708": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_275_202018-02-2020846": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1360_202123-03-2021670": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1018_202010-06-20202018": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1731_201906-06-20192486": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1042_202010-06-20202021": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1668_202014-07-20201228": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_230_202118-01-20217125": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1790_202023-07-20203045": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_302_202019-02-2020787": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1414_202002-07-20201585": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4239_202006-01-20213676": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_203_202017-03-202052": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_762_201929-08-20196": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_666_201923-07-2019872": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_130_202106-02-20211207": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_989_201905-11-2019452": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1151_201909-12-2019175": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_645_201924-07-2019241": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_37_202013-01-20201066": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_672_202001-10-2020999": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_349_202026-06-2020788": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_872_202003-12-2020734": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_67_202012-02-2020286": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_456_201901-06-2019615": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_618_202022-09-20201094": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1104_201927-11-2019266": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_145_202110-02-20211174": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_860_201911-10-2019640": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_260_202001-06-2020380": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_586_202014-09-20201172": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1230_201918-12-201957": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_392_202103-04-2021832": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_671_201931-07-2019193": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1252_201901-01-2020683": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_395_202009-07-2020698": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_567_202016-09-2020589": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_421_202115-04-2021816": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_423_202116-04-2021802": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_556_201912-07-2019361": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_356_202001-07-2020774": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_314_202010-06-2020827": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_891_201915-10-2019619": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_876_202015-01-2021695": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_61_202015-02-2020844": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_38_202013-01-2020575": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_646_202009-10-2020429": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_206_202103-03-20211057": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_546_202028-08-20201258": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_31_202005-02-2020402": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_32_202007-02-2020885": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_203_202011-05-2020911": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_315_202010-06-2020828": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_446_202028-07-2020579": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_51_202010-02-2020298": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_268_202029-05-2020891": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_54_202014-02-2020852": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_152_202117-02-20211137": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_38_202005-02-2020403": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_598_202016-09-20201144": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_212_202104-03-20211041": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_699_201930-07-2019840": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_469_202005-08-2020529": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_938_201922-10-2019567": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_215_202011-05-2020915": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_13_202002-01-2020674": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_53_202015-02-2020244": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_590_202016-09-20201141": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_645_202028-09-20201046": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_36_202108-01-20211455": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_66_202120-01-20211364": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_515_202020-08-2020453": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_117_202024-02-2020187": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_110_202028-02-2020148": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_522_201918-06-2019543": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_152_202003-03-2020132": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_51_202118-01-2021667": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_402_202103-04-2021835": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_33_202012-02-2020277": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_306_202120-03-2021925": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_729_201906-08-2019820": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_50_202013-02-2020860": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_434_201930-05-20191159": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_601_201911-07-2019996": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_652_201920-07-2019886": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_52_202010-02-2020299": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_962_201926-10-2019525": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_588_201910-07-20191002": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_199_202014-07-2020178": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_484_202013-08-202054": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_320_202110-03-2021199": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_109_202102-02-20211254": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_468_201907-06-2019575": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_463_202004-08-2020532": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_335_202022-06-2020802": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_627_201916-07-2019911": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_131_202106-02-20211208": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_360_202001-07-2020777": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_595_201909-07-2019407": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_29_202006-02-2020390": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_951_201924-10-2019535": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_494_201902-07-2019471": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_194_202004-06-2020354": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_915_201924-10-2019534": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_17_202007-02-2020883": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_98_202130-01-20211272": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_812_202010-11-2020824": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_945_202023-12-2020650": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_221_202019-03-202023": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_615_201915-07-2019924": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_61_202012-02-2020285": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_322_202123-03-2021895": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_573_202025-09-2020509": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_268_202116-03-2021969": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_43_202012-02-2020867": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_921_202017-12-2020685": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_644_202029-09-20201022": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_133_202103-02-2021542": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_402_201909-05-2019779": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_343_202023-06-2020800": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_778_202012-11-2020791": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_181_202006-03-2020102": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_427_201924-05-2019679": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_290_202122-03-2021905": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_670_201931-07-2019192": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_621_202001-10-2020463": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_874_202003-12-2020736": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_219_202105-03-20211034": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_448_202029-07-2020559": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_165_202122-02-20211118": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_519_201901-07-20191072": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_46_202013-02-2020858": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_641_202016-10-2020366": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_528_202026-08-2020430": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_376_202131-03-2021866": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_452_202010-08-202069": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_565_201906-07-20191027": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_449_202029-07-2020560": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_672_201925-07-2019858": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_232_202020-03-202016": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1153_201930-11-2019248": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_485_201920-06-20191130": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_24_202007-01-20201088": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1146_201930-11-2019247": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1035_201905-11-2019458": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_220_202122-02-2021372": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_593_201915-07-2019326": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_569_202024-09-2020521": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_522_201901-07-20191075": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1279_201920-12-201937": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_302_202120-03-2021921": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_623_202022-09-20201098": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_385_202007-07-2020721": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_526_201901-07-20191079": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_246_202124-02-2021337": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_294_202004-06-2020855": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_475_202006-08-202088": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_250_202028-05-2020894": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_574_202030-09-2020468": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_907_202016-12-2020689": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_534_201925-06-2019514": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_751_202028-10-2020922": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_790_202006-11-2020863": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_434_201924-05-2019681": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_302_202003-06-2020372": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_921_201916-10-2019609": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_206_202017-03-202055": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_312_202122-03-2021910": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_285_202117-03-2021145": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_229_202122-02-2021375": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_399_202102-04-2021854": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_142_202109-02-20211189": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_247_202124-02-2021338": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_211_202115-03-2021981": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_453_201931-05-2019623": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_641_202028-09-20201043": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_503_201926-06-20191093": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_74_202027-01-2020961": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_272_202116-03-2021971": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_863_201930-09-2019713": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_245_202026-05-2020908": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_936_202021-12-2020657": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_332_202123-03-2021898": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_888_202010-12-2020713": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_450_202029-07-2020561": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_652_202029-09-20201026": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_41_202016-01-20201046": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_569_202007-09-20201210": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_867_202007-01-2021751": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_300_202118-03-2021938": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_161_202004-03-2020120": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1024_201914-11-2019399": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_493_202017-08-2020487": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_693_201927-07-2019848": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_759_201928-08-201917": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_492_201922-06-20191116": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_86_202015-02-2020245": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_258_202027-05-2020904": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1239_201918-12-201959": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_483_202017-08-2020486": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_695_201927-08-201927": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_640_201931-07-2019189": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_103_201916-07-20191328": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_38_202014-01-20201054": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_754_202028-10-2020924": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_831_202011-12-202066": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_164_202016-03-2020721": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_920_201916-10-2019608": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_523_201926-06-2019510": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_733_202019-10-2020968": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_158_202117-02-20211139": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_265_202116-03-2021966": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1027_201902-11-2019485": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_277_202117-03-2021948": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_808_202010-11-2020820": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_275_202103-03-2021277": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_726_201906-08-2019818": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_104_202101-02-20211266": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_166_202021-03-2020687": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_177_202017-03-2020719": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_10_202003-01-20201126": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_147_202003-03-2020130": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_408_202117-04-2021790": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_870_202002-12-2020743": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_147_202005-03-2020743": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_682_202016-10-2020370": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_26_202106-01-20211468": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_898_202011-12-2020711": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_357_202126-03-2021869": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4_202001-01-20201144": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_411_201920-05-20191193": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_169_202131-03-202165": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_58_202020-01-20201014": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_482_202012-08-2020514": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_84_202024-02-2020807": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_837_201928-09-2019731": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1128_201928-11-2019260": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_697_202020-10-2020348": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_170_202017-03-2020713": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1103_201904-12-2019213": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_81_202125-01-20211315": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_958_201931-10-2019501": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_602_202016-09-20201148": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_630_201920-07-2019268": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_108_202022-01-2020498": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_477_202013-08-2020507": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_568_202007-09-20201209": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_551_201903-07-20191052": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_261_202118-03-2021931": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_236_202020-03-202018": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_546_202009-09-2020614": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1070_201921-11-2019312": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_562_202004-09-20201226": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_32_202009-01-20201077": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_573_201909-07-2019404": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_995_201901-11-2019498": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_504_201927-06-20191087": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_335_202115-03-2021174": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_27_202007-01-20201091": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_21_202004-02-2020914": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_215_202018-03-202038": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_324_202110-03-2021203": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_417_202114-04-2021825": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_137_202003-03-2020766": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_768_202002-11-2020895": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_905_201903-10-2019701": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1129_201905-12-2019205": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_650_201920-07-2019884": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_108_202106-02-2021499": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_17_202014-02-2020252": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_392_202124-03-202197": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_381_202122-03-2021117": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_389_201908-05-2019789": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_391_202102-04-2021849": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_286_202002-06-2020867": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1054_201906-11-2019440": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_77_202014-02-2020259": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_466_202006-08-202085": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_742_202023-10-2020944": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_93_202104-02-2021522": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_133_201906-06-20191357": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_361_202118-03-2021139": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_367_202006-07-2020733": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_769_201929-08-20197": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_65_202023-01-2020982": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_370_202131-03-2021864": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_59_202015-02-2020842": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_217_202122-02-2021370": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_172_202017-03-2020714": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_288_202003-06-2020858": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_417_202020-07-2020638": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_399_202014-07-2020670": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_358_202001-07-2020776": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_249_202115-03-2021982": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_621_201908-08-2019139": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_381_202102-04-2021845": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_416_202020-07-2020637": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_185_201920-08-20191292": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_512_201901-07-20191067": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_549_202003-09-20201239": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_673_201925-07-2019859": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_417_202102-04-202155": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_662_202030-09-20201004": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_791_202006-11-2020864": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1066_201921-11-2019311": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_157_202017-03-2020708": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_332_202015-06-2020314": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_227_202106-03-20211022": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100_202021-01-2020509": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_730_201906-08-2019821": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_403_202028-10-2020917": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_231_202020-03-202015": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_552_201905-07-20191034": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_566_202018-09-2020565": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2_202031-01-2020937": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_132_202106-02-20211209": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_57_202009-01-2020599": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1036_201918-11-2019355": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_67_202122-01-20211326": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_881_202008-12-2020723": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_541_202001-09-20201250": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_653_201926-07-2019228": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_458_201927-05-2019663": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_300_202010-06-2020331": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_300_202005-06-2020850": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_115_202024-02-2020185": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1211_201910-12-2019162": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1134_201911-12-2019150": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_105_202026-02-2020798": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_64_202018-02-2020827": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_75_202122-01-20211330": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_177_202006-03-202099": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_146_202005-03-2020742": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_57_202119-01-20211367": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_659_201922-07-2019878": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_518_201901-07-20191071": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1242_201913-12-2019128": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_681_201914-08-2019111": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_935_201910-10-2019665": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_247_202001-06-2020868": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7_202102-01-20211482": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_555_201902-07-2019474": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_399_201917-05-2019729": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_912_202016-12-2020693": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_394_201901-05-2019814": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_237_202123-02-2021357": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_567_202007-09-20201208": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_163_202004-03-2020122": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_965_201916-10-2019612": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_655_202012-10-2020416": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_538_202027-08-20201263": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_432_202027-07-2020132": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_675_201901-08-2019182": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_315_202109-03-2021219": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_28_202005-02-2020400": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_721_201919-08-201990": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_446_201907-06-20191136": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1121_201925-11-2019289": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_845_202015-12-202049": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_22_202007-02-2020373": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_892_202011-12-2020708": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8_202003-01-20201125": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_653_202029-09-20201027": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_806_202010-11-2020818": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_872_201915-10-2019618": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_437_202028-10-2020918": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_919_202017-12-2020684": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_54_202118-01-20211373": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_339_202022-06-2020803": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_638_201918-07-2019895": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1249_201916-12-201982": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_936_201922-10-2019563": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_44_202018-01-20201032": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_34_202113-01-20211418": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_413_201921-05-20191189": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_918_202017-12-2020683": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_889_202010-12-2020714": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_416_202114-04-2021824": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1216_201910-12-2019166": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_152_202006-03-2020734": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_112_202102-02-20211256": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_317_202123-03-2021892": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1085_201926-11-2019274": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_408_201918-05-20191198": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_24_202112-03-2021986": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_732_202023-10-2020941": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_106_202101-02-20211267": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_181_201916-08-20191301": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_525_201901-07-20191078": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_633_201924-07-2019239": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_150_202005-03-2020744": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_651_201908-08-2019142": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_529_201920-06-2019530": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_269_202117-03-2021944": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_870_201922-10-2019560": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1117_201902-12-2019237": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_429_201928-05-20191165": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_372_202007-07-2020715": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_700_201908-08-2019147": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_441_201930-05-2019633": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_484_201920-06-20191129": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1138_201927-11-2019270": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_858_202026-11-2020755": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_606_201919-07-2019282": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_664_201923-07-2019870": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_432_202024-07-2020591": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_37_202006-01-2020631": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_883_201909-10-2019667": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_625_201916-07-2019910": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_258_202116-03-2021963": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_591_201915-07-2019324": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_371_202116-04-20218": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_557_201904-07-2019446": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_14_202002-01-2020675": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_489_201903-06-2019605": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_455_201901-06-2019614": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_311_202122-03-2021909": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_614_202021-09-20201117": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_79_202017-01-2020551": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1009_201904-11-2019465": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_660_202020-10-2020338": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_129_202106-02-20211206": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101_202021-01-2020510": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_524_201919-06-2019536": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_607_202007-10-2020432": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_675_202020-10-2020345": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_589_202022-09-2020547": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_30_202005-02-2020911": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1047_201920-11-2019321": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1241_201913-12-2019127": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_87_202017-02-2020228": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_431_202023-07-2020603": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_590_201915-07-2019323": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_387_202008-07-2020710": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_43_202006-02-2020393": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_122_202105-02-20211221": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_27_202107-01-20211458": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_366_202004-07-2020746": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_681_202016-10-2020369": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_355_202002-07-2020767": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_166_202126-02-20211079": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_412_201920-05-20191194": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_386_202123-03-2021109": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_274_202005-06-2020347": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_515_201901-07-20191068": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1224_201911-12-2019154": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1113_201926-11-2019275": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1045_201920-11-2019319": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_105_202031-01-2020352": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_18_202109-02-2021571": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2058_201929-01-2020367": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__976_201906-08-201982": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1557_202013-11-2020311": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_150_202115-03-2021252": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1193_202023-09-2020695": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__795_201918-07-2019175": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_979_202007-08-202042": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1662_202016-12-202096": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_336_202120-03-2021194": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_206_202123-02-2021436": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_94_202127-01-2021735": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2060_201923-01-2020403": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1612_202010-12-2020176": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_307_202131-03-2021111": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__58_202021-01-2020416": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_232_202117-02-2021511": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__675_201929-06-2019332": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1393_201925-09-2019467": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1291_202023-09-2020702": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1628_202001-12-2020248": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__763_201903-07-2019280": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_332_202116-03-2021235": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_744_202013-07-2020169": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1545_201921-07-2020113": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__741_201929-06-2019335": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1343_202008-10-2020576": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1159_201927-08-201923": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_24_202111-01-2021871": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_17_202112-01-2021848": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__27_202021-01-2020414": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_199_202102-03-2021372": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_803_202021-07-2020115": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1716_202016-01-2021820": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_900_202005-09-2020832": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__548_201927-05-2019446": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1751_201925-11-2019148": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__407_201902-05-2019508": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_42_202006-02-2020297": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1064_201914-08-201962": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1563_202019-11-2020300": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_480_202107-04-202151": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1226_201904-09-2019684": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_245_202109-03-2021289": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1057_201909-08-201975": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_225_202123-02-2021439": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1129_201916-11-2019170": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1490_202031-10-2020422": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1655_202009-12-2020185": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_348_202101-04-202196": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_230_202104-03-2021346": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_150_202003-02-2020340": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1461_202031-10-2020421": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_238_202017-02-2020160": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_237_202025-02-2020113": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1508_202021-12-202049": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1092_202015-09-2020764": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1280_202007-10-2020592": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1484_202002-11-2020382": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__980_201926-07-2019130": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1414_202021-10-2020472": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_215_202118-02-2021493": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1816_201928-11-2019126": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_771_202004-07-2020232": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_148_202124-02-2021423": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1563_201907-12-201962": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1294_202001-10-2020658": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_440_202128-04-20217": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1949_201918-01-2020433": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_144_202003-02-2020338": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_69_202115-01-2021825": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_897_202027-07-202078": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_61_202128-01-2021718": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1097_201914-08-201964": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1584_202007-12-2020198": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1611_202008-12-2020194": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_316_202122-03-2021169": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1382_202007-11-2020350": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_928_202028-07-202072": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1152_202022-09-2020705": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1449_202009-11-2020336": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_130_202031-01-2020356": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1268_202012-10-2020560": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1713_201914-11-2019193": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_402_202020-03-20206": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_320_202123-03-2021150": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1525_202009-11-2020338": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1871_201924-12-20192": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_297_202108-03-2021307": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_77_202102-02-2021638": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1825_201924-01-2020397": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1047_202025-08-20204": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_815_202015-07-2020156": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1839_201914-01-2020446": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1641_202015-12-2020102": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_859_202024-07-202089": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1372_202013-11-2020304": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1581_202001-04-2021102": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__909_201927-07-2019120": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1425_202020-10-2020483": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1422_201905-10-2019418": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_208_202019-02-2020134": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1043_201903-09-2019689": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_474_202106-04-202163": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_697_202006-07-2020213": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1452_202020-10-2020486": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2021_201910-01-2020460": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1073_201909-08-201977": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1670_202019-12-202058": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_640_202009-07-2020188": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1192_201929-08-20194": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_194_202004-02-2021626": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__676_201906-07-2019253": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_90_202122-01-2021758": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__748_201923-07-2019153": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1271_202001-10-2020655": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_395_202125-03-2021129": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__849_201917-08-201945": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1077_202025-08-20205": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_217_202018-02-2020139": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_334_202124-03-2021139": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_946_202027-07-202083": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_255_202017-02-2020161": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1124_201921-08-201934": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1604_202004-12-2020218": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_874_202017-07-2020136": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1749_201905-12-201996": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1294_202001-10-2020657": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__998_201917-08-201946": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1154_202022-09-2020706": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1924_201902-01-2020488": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1955_201924-12-20193": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1434_202021-10-2020474": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__679_201919-06-2019399": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1337_201917-09-2019541": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_318_202120-03-2021192": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1352_202016-10-2020515": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_51_202112-01-2021854": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__672_201920-06-2019394": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_309_202003-03-202086": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_341_202115-03-2021253": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_363_202123-03-2021156": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1226_202028-09-2020688": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_371_202120-03-2021195": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_86_202004-02-2020323": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1424_201925-10-2019261": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_184_202109-02-2021574": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__96_202027-01-2020381": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1754_202013-01-2021839": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_384_202012-03-202037": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_831_202010-07-2020184": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_656_202024-07-202087": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1433_202027-11-2020257": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_298_202108-03-2021308": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_185_202110-02-2021560": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1355_202008-10-2020581": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1474_202005-11-2020364": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_172_202104-02-2021625": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1364_201923-09-2019478": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1606_201917-01-2020439": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_218_202118-02-2021494": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_88_202127-01-2021734": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_884_202017-07-2020140": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1048_201917-08-201947": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1043_202018-09-2020733": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_876_202016-07-2020151": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1380_201919-09-2019517": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1244_201914-11-2019182": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1633_202005-12-2020208": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_463_202113-04-202117": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1705_202022-12-202024": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1_202007-01-2020478": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__16_202024-01-2020391": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_888_202017-07-2020141": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1289_202023-09-2020701": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1632_202010-12-2020179": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_389_202018-03-202020": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1746_201927-11-2019130": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_213_202125-02-2021412": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_828_202013-07-2020172": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1658_202009-12-2020186": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_74_202127-01-2021732": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__704_201921-06-2019389": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_816_202009-07-2020194": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_877_202017-07-2020137": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_754_202004-07-2020230": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__936_201930-07-2019115": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1174_201907-09-2019671": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_834_202014-07-2020164": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_182_202013-02-2020179": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_202_202108-03-2021303": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1733_202023-12-202012": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1_202106-01-2021906": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2018_201908-01-2020472": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1061_201909-08-201976": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_476_202107-04-202149": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1723_202011-01-2021874": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_747_202024-07-202088": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1301_201912-09-2019655": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_207_202015-12-202099": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_209_202006-02-2020304": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1803_201904-02-2020318": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1674_202017-12-202088": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_270_202031-07-202056": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__92_202021-01-2020420": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102_202129-01-2021684": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100_202106-02-2021588": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1685_202024-12-20202": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__141_202029-01-2020364": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_254_202131-03-2021110": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_292_202120-03-2021188": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1054_201914-08-201961": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_890_202017-07-2020142": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1729_201917-01-2020440": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__111_202027-01-2020384": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1267_202005-10-2020619": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_857_202021-07-2020118": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1215_202021-09-2020720": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_548_202115-04-20216": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1507_202002-11-2020384": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1385_202012-10-2020563": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1885_201923-12-20195": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__594_201928-05-2019433": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1009_202025-08-20203": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1643_202016-12-202094": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_311_202029-02-202091": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_177_202007-02-2020286": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1090_202008-09-2020819": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_879_202020-07-2020125": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1457_202021-10-2020478": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1536_202009-11-2020344": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_807_202016-07-2020146": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_98_202102-02-2021641": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1695_202022-12-202021": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1485_202002-11-2020383": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2218_201926-06-20192370": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2178_202023-09-20204326": "DENIED", + "Bail_2781_201901-08-2019719": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_107_202001-02-20201516": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1985_201930-05-20192861": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2798_202009-12-2020686": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2021_202028-09-20201728": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2365_202020-11-2020957": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1758_202020-08-2020123": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_82_202106-02-20211543": "DENIED", + "Bail_1775_201901-05-20193598": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_702_202024-02-2020664": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2977_201907-09-20195566": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1946_202004-09-20202054": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_520_202015-02-2020902": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2013_202011-09-20204536": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4624_201921-12-2019140": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_549_202126-02-20211049": "GRANTED", + "Bail_226_202009-01-20202292": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1595_202010-08-20201166": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_662_202102-03-20211002": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_923_202122-03-2021465": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_42_202001-02-20201496": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_443_202116-02-20211266": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2058_202017-09-20204419": "DENIED", + "Bail_3309_201930-09-20194492": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2759_202005-12-2020732": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3901_201906-11-20192770": "GRANTED", + "Bail_247_202010-01-20202229": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2557_201924-07-2019924": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2373_202020-10-20201427": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2978_202021-01-20211925": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_509_202015-02-2020891": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_382_202106-02-20211556": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2795_202009-12-2020683": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2624_202003-12-2020777": "DENIED", + "Bail_160_202027-01-20201693": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_622_202116-03-2021635": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_668_202020-02-2020738": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2123_202015-10-20201474": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_216_202122-01-20211895": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_526_202015-02-2020906": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2207_202028-09-20204238": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2356_202021-10-20201392": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_302_202108-02-20211503": "GRANTED", + "Bail_623_202028-01-20201666": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_617_202103-03-2021971": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_507_202015-02-2020889": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2119_202017-09-20204432": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2177_202023-09-20204325": "DENIED", + "Bail_4608_201924-12-201944": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_254_202112-02-20211325": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1346_202006-06-2020755": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1201_202020-05-2020905": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4022_201927-11-20192045": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1056_202019-05-2020911": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1193_202027-05-2020850": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_706_202024-02-2020668": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1848_201907-05-20193479": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_280_202112-02-20211327": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2202_201914-06-20192542": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_707_202110-03-2021766": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2083_202012-10-20201538": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2368_202008-10-20204004": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1063_202107-04-2021119": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_856_202028-02-2020460": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2647_201919-07-20191075": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_834_202120-03-2021510": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3675_201921-10-20193971": "DENIED", + "Bail_2937_201917-08-2019301": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2162_201915-06-20192527": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3888_201913-11-20192602": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2237_202015-10-20201479": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1198_202016-06-20201535": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_789_202026-02-2020575": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1104_202107-04-2021129": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1905_201916-05-20193259": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1109_202008-06-20201630": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_175_202102-02-20211665": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3196_201930-09-20194485": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2219_202028-09-20204239": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_794_202120-03-2021502": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_270_202010-02-20201199": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3489_201926-09-20194619": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3601_201905-10-20194370": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_563_202017-02-2020847": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_274_202010-02-20201203": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_849_202017-03-202046": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1907_202003-09-20204736": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2267_202012-11-20201031": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1349_202019-06-20201435": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_28_202004-02-20201410": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_392_202108-02-20211517": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_242_202127-01-20211830": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_493_202122-02-20211167": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2205_201917-06-20192514": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1975_201929-05-20192913": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1069_202105-04-2021166": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_822_202124-03-2021364": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4631_201906-01-20202475": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_492_202104-03-2021938": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1701_202019-08-20201097": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2038_202015-09-20204501": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1274_202024-06-2020485": "DENIED", + "Bail_4490_201917-01-20202076": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_756_202025-02-2020623": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_673_202020-02-2020743": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_829_202115-03-2021693": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_278_202010-02-20201206": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2255_202029-09-20204214": "DENIED", + "Bail_1801_201909-05-20193421": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1690_202019-08-20201086": "DENIED", + "Bail_614_202028-01-20201657": "GRANTED", + "Bail_334_202015-01-20202098": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_508_202117-02-20211241": "GRANTED", + "Bail_280_202021-01-20201909": "DENIED", + "Bail_2273_201920-06-20192482": "GRANTED", + "Bail_585_202027-01-20201713": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_262_202010-02-20201191": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1146_202112-04-202161": "GRANTED", + "Bail_61_202003-01-20202576": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1554_202025-08-202031": "DENIED", + "Bail_4567_201918-12-2019229": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100_202125-01-20211855": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4062_201926-11-20192119": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_440_202110-02-20211430": "GRANTED", + "Bail_456_202021-01-20201917": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2148_202009-10-20201559": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2152_202021-09-20204380": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1105_202011-05-2020979": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3449_201926-09-20194612": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_963_201913-12-2019142": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_703_202125-03-2021324": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_27_202004-02-20201409": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_366_202115-02-20211287": "GRANTED", + "Bail_165_202007-01-20202387": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1208_202015-06-20201578": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1028_202022-05-20201723": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2695_202027-11-2020809": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4628_201924-12-201945": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_135_202003-02-20201472": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_719_202024-02-2020678": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1451_202007-07-2020290": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_8_202031-01-20201565": "DENIED", + "Bail_101_202004-01-20202507": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2772_201931-07-2019770": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_433_202110-02-20211427": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1779_202025-08-202036": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4274_201907-12-20191500": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2256_202012-10-20201550": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_744_202025-02-2020614": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1076_202105-04-2021170": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_682_202108-03-2021862": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2382_201901-07-20192271": "GRANTED", + "Bail_369_202024-01-20204227": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_336_202109-02-20211471": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_588_202123-02-20211134": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1737_202021-08-202096": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_798_202110-03-2021775": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2105_202017-09-20204426": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2392_201905-07-20192116": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1880_201913-05-20193357": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_856_202116-03-2021653": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2008_202028-09-20201727": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1626_202018-08-20201108": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1636_202018-08-2020151": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2110_201901-06-20192805": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3461_201925-09-20194665": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1312_202009-06-2020717": "DENIED", + "Bail_3536_201918-10-20194038": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_452_202008-07-2020271": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_325_202011-02-20201143": "GRANTED", + "Bail_552_202024-01-20201765": "GRANTED", + "Bail_222_202022-01-20201848": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_676_202112-03-2021717": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_838_202120-03-2021511": "DENIED", + "Bail_522_202023-01-20201816": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_916_202124-03-2021376": "GRANTED", + "Bail_389_202018-01-20202016": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2660_202020-11-2020971": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_272_202012-02-20203558": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_258_202010-02-20201187": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_886_202029-02-2020404": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1059_202109-04-202188": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_598_202105-03-2021913": "DENIED", + "Bail_3_202002-01-20202639": "GRANTED", + "Bail_504_202022-01-20201879": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4243_201902-01-20202657": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_369_202110-02-20211425": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2258_201920-06-20192469": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1584_202004-07-2020342": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_444_202116-02-20211267": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1463_202024-06-2020496": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_935_202122-03-2021470": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1723_202024-08-20201032": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_248_202102-02-20211674": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2055_201901-06-20192791": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2669_202004-12-2020751": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2078_202015-09-20204515": "DENIED", + "Bail_229_202009-01-20202295": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2363_202008-10-20204000": "DENIED", + "Bail_2206_201919-06-20192494": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_765_202108-03-2021872": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2356_201901-07-20192267": "GRANTED", + "Bail_362_202017-01-20202064": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_460_202014-02-2020949": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_590_202017-02-2020860": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1873_201920-05-20193182": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1898_202005-09-20204680": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3893_201907-11-20192679": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1926_202007-09-20202013": "DENIED", + "Bail_3473_201905-10-20194350": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2100_202025-09-20201756": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3968_201924-12-201925": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1787_201906-05-20193508": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2793_202009-12-2020681": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2518_202011-11-20201081": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1424_202001-07-20201351": "DENIED", + "Bail_3392_201925-10-20193842": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_275_202010-02-20201204": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_198_202012-02-20201061": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_847_202003-03-2020327": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1605_202014-08-20201139": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2804_202019-11-20203118": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1444_202002-07-20201333": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_559_202125-02-20211077": "DENIED", + "Bail_3922_201907-11-20192685": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2488_201908-07-20192071": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2928_202027-11-20202891": "DENIED", + "Bail_4026_201926-11-20192115": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_327_202011-02-20201145": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1977_202008-09-20201991": "GRANTED", + "Bail_374_202017-01-20202074": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_920_202109-04-202185": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2621_202025-11-2020861": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_647_202020-02-2020725": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2199_202025-09-20204271": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_570_202017-02-2020854": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_38_202022-01-2020424": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_427_202013-02-20201030": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_379_202014-02-2020943": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1629_202014-08-20201143": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_593_202123-02-20211138": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2390_202029-10-20201279": "DENIED", + "Bail_2793_201902-08-2019663": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_609_202018-02-2020790": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3182_202016-12-20202394": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_446_202004-03-2020270": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2699_202007-12-2020704": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_604_202115-03-2021680": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1076_202029-05-20201674": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1037_202026-05-20201716": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_777_202109-03-2021821": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_837_202004-03-2020277": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_89_202127-01-2021514": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2565_202031-10-20203545": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2783_202018-11-20203148": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_500_202026-02-2020559": "DENIED", + "Bail_2466_201906-07-20192093": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2513_202013-11-20201022": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1836_201910-05-20193392": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_680_202108-03-2021861": "DENIED", + "Bail_2072_201929-05-20192921": "GRANTED", + "Bail_249_202021-01-20201908": "DENIED", + "Bail_2182_201918-07-20191100": "GRANTED", + "Bail_302_202014-01-20202150": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2579_202013-11-20201025": "DENIED", + "Bail_1809_201928-05-20192957": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_896_201903-12-2019211": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1322_202008-06-2020738": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2785_202018-11-20203150": "DENIED", + "Bail_4291_201904-12-20191676": "GRANTED", + "Bail_198_202008-01-20202336": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3994_201910-12-20191453": "DENIED", + "Bail_3532_201904-10-20194397": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3342_201918-09-20194924": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_24_202013-01-2020546": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2185_202014-10-20201500": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_536_202015-02-2020915": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_389_202012-02-20201098": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_354_202012-02-20201080": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_256_202110-02-20211420": "GRANTED", + "Bail_705_202031-01-20201554": "GRANTED", + "Bail_556_202027-01-20201706": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_835_202123-03-2021416": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_655_202020-02-2020730": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1599_202012-08-20201147": "DENIED", + "Bail_1942_201916-05-20193265": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1940_201904-06-20192714": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4584_201903-01-20202601": "GRANTED", + "Bail_78_202003-01-20202589": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2168_201910-06-20192602": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1256_202028-05-2020844": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1309_202017-06-20201516": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_861_202028-02-2020465": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_926_202013-05-2020966": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_820_202124-03-2021362": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_986_202015-05-20201758": "DENIED", + "Bail_2325_201925-06-20192406": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_933_202122-03-2021469": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_259_202109-02-20211466": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2878_202026-11-20202914": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_522_202015-02-2020904": "GRANTED", + "Bail_200_202013-01-20202187": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4588_201903-01-20202602": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_260_202108-02-20211497": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2814_202018-12-2020105": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1023_202026-05-20201715": "DENIED", + "Bail_2810_201920-06-20195397": "GRANTED", + "Bail_288_202027-01-20201697": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2059_202008-10-20201571": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4606_201909-01-20202301": "DENIED", + "Bail_2744_201926-07-2019845": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_125_202005-08-202094": "GRANTED", + "Bail_246_202017-01-20202047": "DENIED", + "Bail_2808_201902-08-2019675": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1754_201913-05-20193344": "DENIED", + "Bail_4074_201904-12-20191644": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3732_201919-10-20194016": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2753_202003-12-2020783": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_771_202109-03-2021816": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_958_202013-05-20201778": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1738_202014-08-2020176": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_221_202125-01-20211862": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4603_201908-01-20202360": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_356_202012-02-20201082": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2858_202023-11-20203026": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_706_202116-03-2021640": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3121_201931-08-20195761": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_438_202029-02-2020385": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1840_202002-09-20204763": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1090_202014-05-2020956": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2277_202014-10-20201510": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_625_202125-02-20211082": "GRANTED", + "Bail_574_202028-01-20201645": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2791_202011-12-2020642": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2848_202023-11-20203019": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1693_202004-09-20202039": "DENIED", + "Bail_3538_201931-07-20194057": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_29_202003-02-20201446": "DENIED", + "Bail_2387_201910-07-20191974": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_816_202027-02-2020514": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1819_201906-05-20193513": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_495_202119-02-20211206": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_854_202116-03-2021651": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_679_202020-02-2020749": "GRANTED", + "Bail_384_202018-01-20202011": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_570_202122-02-20211183": "GRANTED", + "Bail_409_202023-01-20201798": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2706_202025-11-2020872": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_867_202122-03-2021462": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3071_201902-07-20195091": "DENIED", + "Bail_4806_201904-10-20197457": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1922_202004-09-20202051": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_818_202027-02-2020515": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1762_201913-05-20193345": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3210_201909-09-20195549": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1099_202026-05-2020859": "GRANTED", + "Bail_5195_201930-10-20196744": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_844_201922-11-2019274": "DENIED", + "Bail_2009_201903-06-20192758": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_412_202109-02-20211476": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_161_202128-01-20211791": "GRANTED", + "Bail_704_202031-01-20201552": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1976_202024-09-20201767": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4201_201921-12-2019103": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1676_202005-08-2020220": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2210_201917-06-20192515": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_776_202123-03-2021413": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2386_202022-10-20201363": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1800_202007-09-20202006": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1489_202014-08-2020162": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1188_202003-06-2020781": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_117_202027-07-2020129": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1822_201908-05-20193450": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_700_202026-02-2020566": "GRANTED", + "Bail_263_202010-01-20202241": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_293_202102-02-20211684": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_445_202009-09-2020433": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_228_202006-11-2020395": "DENIED", + "Bail_4006_201919-11-20192357": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4297_201907-12-20191503": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_554_202122-02-20211173": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_516_202015-02-2020898": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_529_202015-02-2020909": "GRANTED", + "Bail_23_202002-01-20202653": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3669_201914-10-20194195": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2421_202014-10-20203866": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_482_202014-02-2020971": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1192_202117-04-202115": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_361_202012-02-20201086": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_763_202025-02-2020629": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_303_202108-02-20211504": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4549_201902-01-20202663": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2566_202011-11-20201087": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2815_201906-08-2019546": "GRANTED", + "Bail_386_202018-01-20202013": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1147_202112-04-202162": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_137_202017-08-202056": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1819_202028-08-20204848": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_515_202015-02-2020897": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1016_202015-05-2020943": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_609_202125-02-20211079": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3819_201931-10-20193269": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1380_202024-06-20201392": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1246_202006-07-2020305": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2739_202002-12-2020796": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3535_201904-10-20194398": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2779_201901-08-2019717": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_847_202120-03-2021514": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1622_202006-07-2020321": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_435_202013-02-20201038": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1220_202009-07-2020253": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2219_201914-06-20192547": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1047_202116-04-202119": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2344_202020-10-20201425": "GRANTED", + "Bail_304_202014-01-20202152": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2945_201909-09-20195533": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2394_202021-10-20201396": "GRANTED", + "Bail_590_202027-01-20201718": "GRANTED", + "Bail_99_202004-01-20202505": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1626_202014-08-2020167": "DENIED", + "Bail_2298_201925-06-20192399": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3972_201916-11-20192416": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2101_202130-04-202131": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1147_202014-05-2020961": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2721_202003-12-2020781": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_882_202029-02-2020400": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1275_202017-06-20201505": "DENIED", + "Bail_1923_201930-05-20192858": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_514_202015-02-2020896": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_587_202025-02-2020607": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2865_202016-12-2020179": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1067_202028-05-20201685": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1277_202030-05-2020821": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2027_202018-09-20201830": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2_202104-01-2021686": "DENIED", + "Bail_3481_201901-10-20194452": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_237_202111-02-20211362": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2759_201902-08-2019661": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2_202002-01-20202638": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_422_202122-02-20211161": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_646_202020-02-2020724": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1751_202026-08-202010": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_351_202105-02-20211574": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_31_202005-02-2020444": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1271_202028-05-2020845": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2274_202022-10-20201342": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_202_202013-10-2020539": "DENIED", + "Bail_571_202027-01-20201707": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3602_201905-10-20194371": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3290_201916-09-20195028": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4614_201921-12-2019130": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2664_202026-11-2020831": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_911_202102-04-2021225": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2061_201907-06-20192638": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_350_201917-09-2019757": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1405_202017-06-2020597": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_627_202007-03-2020134": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_226_202103-02-20211635": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2967_201931-08-20195751": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_615_202103-03-2021970": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_741_202118-03-2021569": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_538_202015-02-2020917": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2326_202023-10-20201313": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_719_202109-03-2021810": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2846_202018-12-2020111": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1966_202023-09-20201788": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1064_202028-05-20201683": "DENIED", + "Bail_4520_201924-12-201929": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1165_202016-05-2020934": "DENIED", + "Bail_3144_201917-09-20194956": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_597_202018-02-2020779": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2243_202015-10-20201480": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2640_202005-11-20203410": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1883_202009-09-20201955": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_89_202014-02-2020296": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1015_202020-05-20201733": "DENIED", + "Bail_2944_201926-08-2019101": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1823_202024-08-202076": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2221_202014-10-20201504": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2569_202011-11-20201090": "GRANTED", + "Bail_510_202022-01-20201884": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_702_202104-03-2021955": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1066_202028-05-20201684": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_234_202127-01-20211825": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1241_202017-06-20201493": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3039_201904-09-20195658": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2116_201915-06-20192524": "DENIED", + "Bail_1792_201906-05-20193511": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1889_202002-09-20202106": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_358_202012-02-20201084": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_690_202109-03-2021801": "GRANTED", + "Bail_582_202027-01-20201710": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2288_202021-10-20201382": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_115_202121-01-20211917": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_518_201913-08-201970": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_676_202020-02-2020746": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_553_202123-03-2021409": "DENIED", + "Bail_2314_201925-06-20192403": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_105_202101-02-2021471": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1089_202008-05-2020985": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2862_202016-12-2020178": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2077_202028-09-20201731": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1024_202012-03-2020121": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_136_202003-02-20201473": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1041_202019-05-2020910": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1435_202002-07-2020372": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3156_201927-09-20194563": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_94_202122-01-20211881": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1695_202019-08-20201091": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_290_202017-02-2020828": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2572_202011-11-20201091": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_199_202119-03-2021121": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_307_202011-02-20201125": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_108_202003-02-20201453": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1139_202018-05-2020922": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1353_202019-06-20201437": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_510_202105-03-2021909": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_44_202001-02-20201497": "DENIED", + "Bail_142_202008-01-20202331": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1080_202011-05-2020976": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4466_201912-12-20191345": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_534_202015-02-2020914": "GRANTED", + "Bail_266_202010-01-20202244": "GRANTED", + "Bail_182_202007-01-20202402": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2394_201902-07-20192237": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2702_202024-11-2020903": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1762_202020-08-2020124": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_800_202122-03-2021458": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2214_202030-09-20204165": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_288_202101-02-20211713": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_594_202017-02-2020864": "GRANTED", + "Bail_213_202008-01-20202346": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2622_202003-12-2020776": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_994_202005-03-2020243": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1898_201914-05-20193322": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4556_201918-12-2019223": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1651_202010-08-2020191": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1840_202025-08-202044": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_938_202124-03-2021384": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_952_202131-03-2021279": "GRANTED", + "Bail_169_202007-01-20202390": "GRANTED", + "Bail_641_202029-01-20201614": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_550_202126-02-20211050": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2626_202025-11-2020862": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_413_202013-02-20201017": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2066_201906-06-20192674": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4376_201902-01-20202659": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4335_201913-09-20197973": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1867_202005-09-20202023": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_133_202122-01-20211885": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1040_202112-04-202151": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2940_201905-09-20195629": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2132_202005-10-20204074": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2943_202005-12-20202748": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2421_202031-10-20201263": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2472_202002-11-20201248": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_473_202112-02-20211342": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_855_202006-03-2020169": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2282_201927-06-20192340": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_420_202013-02-20201023": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_113_202121-01-20211916": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2445_202016-10-20203819": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2676_202025-11-2020868": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1343_202006-06-2020754": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3099_202010-12-20202659": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_696_202109-03-2021804": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_344_202027-02-2020494": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_34_202017-02-2020822": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4040_201927-11-20192051": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_374_202108-02-20211515": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_368_202110-02-20211424": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2216_202029-09-20204198": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3790_201923-10-20193934": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1384_202024-06-20201396": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2780_202007-12-2020714": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_726_202110-03-2021771": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_539_202109-03-2021795": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_571_202125-03-2021323": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2202_202008-10-20201582": "DENIED", + "Bail_4167_201921-12-2019101": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3065_201929-08-201920": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2780_202018-11-20203145": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1077_202105-04-2021171": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210_202121-01-20211923": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1809_202002-09-20202097": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_295_202103-02-20211644": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3298_201916-09-20195029": "GRANTED", + "Bail_647_202029-01-20201620": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1257_202030-05-2020816": "GRANTED", + "Bail_444_202020-01-20201990": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1387_202024-06-20201399": "DENIED", + "Bail_2209_201919-06-20192496": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1939_202004-09-20202053": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3245_201915-07-20194426": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2387_202031-10-20201258": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_833_202027-02-2020524": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2215_201914-06-20192544": "GRANTED", + "Bail_90_202020-01-20201966": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1314_202017-06-20201519": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_232_202013-02-2020998": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1120_202014-05-2020958": "DENIED", + "Bail_2636_201907-08-2019493": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_955_202123-03-2021428": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_307_202108-02-20211508": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2705_202025-11-2020871": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2441_202029-10-20201285": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1546_202004-08-20201208": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_555_201927-08-201918": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1021_202021-05-20201728": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_334_202011-02-20201152": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4222_201912-12-20191316": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_398_202013-02-20201005": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2905_202019-12-202089": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4470_201913-12-20191276": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1993_202008-09-20201992": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_55_202113-01-2021567": "GRANTED", + "Bail_593_202027-01-20201721": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1842_202001-09-20204802": "DENIED", + "Bail_676_202030-01-20201594": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_329_202108-02-20211510": "DENIED", + "Bail_1976_201901-06-20192782": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_573_202017-02-2020857": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2461_202005-11-20201183": "GRANTED", + "Bail_674_202030-01-20201592": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_490_202018-02-2020777": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3_202005-03-2020208": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2491_202021-11-2020933": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3033_202007-12-20202738": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_276_202106-02-20211549": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2226_202012-10-20201547": "GRANTED", + "Bail_445_202020-01-20201992": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1151_202112-04-202165": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100_202001-02-20201508": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1648_202014-08-2020171": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1_202002-01-20202637": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1151_202021-05-2020888": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1577_202010-08-20201156": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_711_202024-02-2020672": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_644_202020-02-2020723": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_136_202104-02-2021425": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1975_202015-09-20201875": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_155_202104-02-20211595": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_190_202128-01-20211795": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1280_202016-06-20201552": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_815_202027-02-2020513": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2729_202007-12-2020707": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2296_202006-11-20201152": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_263_202010-02-20201192": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_950_202123-03-2021426": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4075_201904-12-20191645": "DENIED", + "Bail_204_202008-01-20202338": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1923_202010-09-20201926": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1090_202107-04-2021122": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3787_201921-10-20193985": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2757_202013-11-20203201": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_530_202103-03-2021967": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1843_202001-10-20201675": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_175_202017-02-2020825": "GRANTED", + "Bail_671_202030-01-20201589": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_426_202122-02-20211163": "DENIED", + "Bail_3487_201901-10-20194454": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_962_202102-04-2021228": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_889_202029-02-2020407": "GRANTED", + "Bail_497_202022-01-20201873": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2107_202001-10-20201683": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2637_202005-11-20203407": "DENIED", + "Bail_2367_201902-07-20192236": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1402_202019-06-2020552": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_376_202014-02-2020940": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2392_202021-10-20201395": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1911_202005-09-20202026": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1025_202012-03-2020122": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1023_202127-04-202121": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1887_202002-09-20204776": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_173_202125-01-20211860": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2488_202012-11-20201046": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2457_202021-11-2020931": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2568_202011-11-20201089": "GRANTED", + "Bail_254_202017-01-20204452": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_701_202024-02-2020663": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1989_201922-05-20193119": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4410_201917-12-2019280": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4139_201928-11-20191974": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_880_202029-02-2020398": "GRANTED", + "Bail_511_202022-01-20201885": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_699_202024-02-2020662": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_675_202020-02-2020745": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_863_202028-02-2020467": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_284_202102-02-20211682": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2661_202020-11-2020972": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_634_202101-03-20211029": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1791_202026-08-202013": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2523_202006-11-20201165": "GRANTED", + "Bail_520_202023-01-20201814": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3703_201919-10-20194015": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1213_202019-05-2020918": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_934_201909-12-2019179": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1037_202019-05-2020909": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2176_202023-09-20204324": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_607_202018-02-2020788": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2112_201901-06-20192807": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1999_202016-09-20201857": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_663_202105-03-2021920": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4452_201912-12-20191335": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1829_202024-08-202079": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2733_202019-12-202078": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1242_202010-06-2020684": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_884_202029-02-2020402": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_124_202004-08-202098": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1022_202020-05-2020901": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_294_202017-02-2020830": "DENIED", + "Bail_3671_201914-10-20194196": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_632_202105-04-2021157": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_159_202121-01-20211920": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_373_202014-02-2020938": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1655_202020-08-20201063": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1928_202001-09-20202136": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2186_202014-10-20201501": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2707_201926-07-2019836": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_183_202010-02-20203700": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_898_202119-03-2021544": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_954_202131-03-2021280": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1878_202002-09-20204770": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1789_202004-09-20202040": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3998_201925-11-20192192": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_658_202020-02-2020731": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1915_202015-09-20201871": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1041_202112-04-202152": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2406_202013-10-20203904": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_424_202013-02-20201027": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1945_202010-09-20201927": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2203_202013-10-20201524": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1810_202027-08-20202189": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1087_202008-05-2020984": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3097_202010-12-20202657": "DENIED", + "Bail_2363_201905-08-2019569": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1157_202018-05-2020924": "GRANTED", + "Bail_104_202004-01-20202510": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_613_202125-02-20211080": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1293_202001-06-2020804": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3208_201911-09-20195514": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2073_202015-09-20204511": "DENIED", + "Bail_3247_201915-07-20194428": "DENIED", + "Bail_180_202007-01-20202400": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2081_202015-09-20204516": "DENIED", + "Bail_2901_201914-08-2019334": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2511_202011-11-20201078": "GRANTED", + "Bail_409_202028-01-20204118": "DENIED", + "Bail_526_202023-01-20201820": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_764_202025-02-2020630": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_403_202119-02-20211202": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4574_201907-01-20202415": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2636_202025-11-2020864": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2918_202019-12-202090": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1900_202026-08-202019": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4578_201914-01-20202159": "GRANTED", + "Bail_120_202014-01-20202132": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2426_202028-10-20201295": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1906_202004-09-20204702": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3315_202023-12-20202229": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2847_202018-12-2020112": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1195_202003-06-2020783": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2659_202002-12-2020794": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2940_202004-12-20202784": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2436_202005-11-20201180": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1297_202001-06-2020808": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_142_202004-02-20201421": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1936_202005-09-20204684": "DENIED", + "Bail_476_202021-01-20201931": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4013_201905-12-20191561": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_447_202020-02-2020708": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_994_202015-05-20201762": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1837_202027-08-20202191": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1694_202019-08-20201090": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1291_202001-06-2020803": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1903_201916-05-20193258": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4017_201923-11-20192258": "GRANTED", + "Bail_323_202015-01-20202094": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3903_201906-11-20192771": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2484_202020-10-20203718": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2103_202007-10-20201593": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3034_201903-07-20195009": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_985_202114-04-202125": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2171_202029-09-20201723": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_321_202011-02-20201139": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2430_202012-11-20201035": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2454_202006-11-20201159": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_62_202010-02-20201174": "DENIED", + "Bail_2523_201924-07-2019922": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_606_202013-05-2020965": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_925_202026-06-2020434": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_616_202126-02-20211054": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1953_202010-09-20201930": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_301_202108-02-20211502": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1827_202024-08-202077": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_479_201911-12-2019255": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_567_202122-02-20211181": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_438_202110-02-20211429": "GRANTED", + "Bail_701_202031-01-20201549": "GRANTED", + "Bail_65_202004-01-20204782": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1705_202020-08-20201069": "DENIED", + "Bail_4327_201908-01-20202354": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_939_202011-05-20201790": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2364_202022-10-20201362": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_403_202013-02-20201010": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_242_202024-11-2020298": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_809_202120-03-2021505": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4072_201902-12-20191773": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4059_201928-11-20191960": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1860_201908-05-20193455": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3311_201901-10-20194443": "DENIED", + "Bail_1824_201906-05-20193516": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_762_202116-03-2021646": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1032_202019-03-202018": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_188_202011-02-20201115": "DENIED", + "Bail_3259_201925-09-20194645": "DENIED", + "Bail_1868_201915-05-20193285": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1593_202010-08-20201164": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_864_202126-03-2021298": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_330_202011-02-20201148": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2884_202017-12-2020150": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2544_202021-11-2020937": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2217_201914-06-20192546": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2304_201920-05-20195928": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_10_202005-02-20201348": "DENIED", + "Bail_2706_201931-07-2019764": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_673_202108-03-2021860": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1160_202029-05-2020828": "DENIED", + "Bail_2812_201902-08-2019678": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4548_201924-12-201936": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_305_202011-02-20201123": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4469_201918-12-2019210": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1409_202001-07-20201343": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_667_202020-02-2020737": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_120_202029-07-2020111": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4430_201924-12-201926": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2147_202009-10-20201558": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_923_202008-05-20201798": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_245_202007-03-202027": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_287_202101-02-20211712": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3939_201916-11-20192414": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2117_202017-09-20204430": "DENIED", + "Bail_616_202028-01-20201659": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_273_202010-02-20201202": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_385_202106-02-20211557": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2347_202007-10-20204027": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1352_202022-06-20201417": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1920_202029-09-20201712": "DENIED", + "Bail_591_202027-01-20201719": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_484_202014-02-2020973": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3104_201931-08-20195759": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_334_202103-02-20211645": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4177_201905-12-20191565": "DENIED", + "Bail_9_202002-01-20202641": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_499_201927-01-2020295": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__230_202122-04-20211": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__177_202125-03-2021128": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_136_202003-03-2020220": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1661_202105-04-20213403": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_45_202028-02-2020479": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_183_201914-06-20191010": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_386_202019-03-202029": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1093_202031-08-20206289": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2236_201924-09-20191826": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1561_202023-10-20202898": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1775_202009-11-20202589": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_418_202103-02-20212344": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_66_202019-02-2020459": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__759_202011-06-20201824": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__851_202023-06-20201679": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__796_202017-06-20201774": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1389_202014-09-20205912": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_411_202103-02-20212339": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_425_201922-10-2019305": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1427_202021-09-20205786": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2302_201923-09-20191863": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1126_202025-08-202039": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_359_202102-02-20212382": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_829_202124-03-2021624": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1725_202023-10-20205049": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__765_202011-06-20201828": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1229_202026-08-2020814": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2016_202007-01-20212998": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_346_202027-10-20202881": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1573_202008-10-20203222": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_45_202122-01-20212681": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1570_202131-03-20213534": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1287_202101-04-2021430": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__239_202002-11-2020158": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__108_202007-09-2020639": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1788_202112-04-20213169": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1048_202028-08-20203796": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1920_202007-12-2020365": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__186_202131-03-202199": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__935_202022-07-20201164": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__54_202109-02-2021420": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1575_202009-10-20203193": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_462_201905-12-2019211": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__90_202101-03-2021337": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_858_202008-07-2020313": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_527_202126-02-20211534": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2778_201920-09-20196539": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__174_202031-08-2020310": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1184_202002-09-20203753": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__211_202124-03-2021688": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_734_202029-06-2020421": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1080_202123-03-2021684": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2306_201926-09-20191767": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_618_202125-02-20211576": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_105_202118-01-20212833": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1539_202006-10-20205453": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3331_201909-12-20195628": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_133_202120-01-20212781": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1015_202005-08-2020145": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_141_202101-02-20212403": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__61_202009-06-2020199": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__42_202102-02-2021455": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3022_201910-12-2019467": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_951_202109-03-20211137": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1378_202015-09-20205861": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1718_202107-04-20213269": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__84_202020-03-20203": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_57_202024-01-2020306": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_177_201911-06-20191020": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__57_202002-06-2020200": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1358_202008-09-20206011": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_188_202125-01-20212652": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_210_201924-07-2019658": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1714_202028-10-20202876": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_70_202113-01-20212882": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1064_202023-07-20201143": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_850_202102-03-20211417": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2751_201923-10-20191089": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__150_202123-03-2021155": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_950_202106-03-20211240": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_394_201926-09-2019369": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1886_202012-11-2020584": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1807_202113-04-20213132": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1237_202026-08-2020822": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1016_202017-07-20201277": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1483_202023-10-20202893": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_61_202028-01-2020284": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1831_202011-11-2020605": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_750_202029-06-2020423": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1406_202022-10-20205073": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1266_202006-10-20203241": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2307_201906-09-20192296": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1631_202013-10-20205352": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1727_202028-10-20205015": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2884_201905-12-2019580": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_471_202111-02-20212017": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1073_202028-08-20203798": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__135_202016-07-202048": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_845_202022-07-2020211": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_513_202015-06-2020544": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1601_202128-04-202113": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__750_202010-06-20201848": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_772_202030-06-2020402": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1870_202012-11-2020579": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1941_202015-12-20203973": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3088_201912-12-2019383": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1009_202005-08-2020143": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_615_202118-02-20211892": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_84_202020-02-2020419": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1606_202013-10-20203141": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_266_202006-03-2020158": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__200_202122-03-2021703": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__774_202012-06-20201808": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1633_202023-12-20203867": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__778_202012-06-20201812": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1474_202024-09-20205658": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__10_202013-02-2020147": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1723_202023-10-20202910": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_146_202127-01-20212593": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__632_202021-05-20201966": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_929_202017-07-2020248": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1413_202024-09-20205653": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1546_202027-11-2020426": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2753_201920-09-20196516": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2815_201922-10-20191139": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1673_202019-10-20205151": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_897_202014-07-2020281": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1793_202003-11-20204951": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_477_202027-05-2020718": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1377_202010-09-20205939": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__157_202124-03-2021136": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1080_202031-08-20203777": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__971_202009-07-20201402": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1757_202028-10-20205031": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2775_201922-10-20191135": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__675_202029-05-20201919": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_230_202108-02-20212129": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1132_202123-03-2021685": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1207_202022-09-20203505": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__197_202014-09-2020275": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2593_201910-10-20191434": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3056_201909-12-2019518": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1867_202129-04-202136": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1155_202011-11-20204851": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1524_202030-09-20205560": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_878_202105-03-20211286": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_243_202006-03-2020149": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_470_202111-02-20212016": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__636_202022-05-20201955": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_12_202010-01-2020531": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_267_202129-01-20212486": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1653_202015-10-20203070": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__172_202110-03-2021764": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_508_202108-02-20212153": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1453_202023-09-20205701": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1321_202004-09-20206129": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_649_202017-06-2020506": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1487_202025-09-20205639": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1666_202016-10-20203037": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2619_201904-09-20197178": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1762_202109-04-20213211": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1790_202112-04-20213171": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1255_202027-08-20206363": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1652_202015-10-20203069": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1018_202017-08-202098": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__25_202119-01-20211094": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__53_202109-02-2021419": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2582_201921-10-20191168": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_286_202019-03-202018": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__203_202021-09-2020253": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2269_201930-08-20192461": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1789_202112-04-20213170": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2976_201904-12-2019615": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_417_201916-10-2019323": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2777_201920-09-20196538": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1003_202004-08-2020153": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1803_202113-04-20213131": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_181_202027-02-2020315": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_446_202104-02-20212288": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1069_202016-09-20205833": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3110_201916-12-201993": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_419_201916-10-2019325": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__216_202005-10-2020218": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2337_201907-11-2019753": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2593_201930-08-20197317": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1153_202119-03-2021825": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1548_202005-10-20205484": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_610_202119-02-20211832": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_325_202123-02-20211660": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2441_201916-10-20191290": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1251_202014-09-20203595": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__111_202025-06-202083": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1484_202014-10-20203091": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__34_202121-01-20211076": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__249_202011-11-2020138": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_487_201913-12-2019152": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_552_202110-02-20212054": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__607_202020-05-20201976": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_948_202108-03-20211172": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__220_202109-04-202127": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_381_201905-09-2019393": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__196_202119-03-2021712": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2263_201923-09-20196482": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_51_202022-01-2020336": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2959_201911-12-2019412": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_459_201904-12-2019222": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__170_202026-08-20205": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1790_202002-11-20204975": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1089_202119-03-2021823": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_627_202101-03-20211469": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_678_202001-07-2020378": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1367_202108-04-2021191": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1733_202009-11-20202583": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_557_202016-06-2020525": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1094_202105-04-2021321": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2895_201910-12-2019458": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_328_201901-08-2019128": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1042_202025-08-202032": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_526_202015-06-2020545": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_14_202010-01-2020533": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_67_202112-01-20212917": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3341_201903-12-20195785": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__775_202012-06-20201809": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1298_202002-09-20206251": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__670_202004-06-20201875": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_114_202024-02-2020389": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2031_202013-01-20212898": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_618_202012-06-2020564": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__167_202004-12-2020421": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__182_202007-09-2020290": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_524_202119-02-20211828": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_462_202021-05-2020746": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__127_202112-03-2021233": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2226_201916-10-20191287": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_648_202119-02-20211835": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2776_201922-10-20191136": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_442_202104-02-20212284": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__617_202021-05-20201959": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2730_201922-10-20191134": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1370_202025-09-20203439": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1591_202008-10-20203225": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1092_202004-08-20201065": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2283_201904-09-20192385": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1698_202021-10-20202966": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__57_202111-02-2021408": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1791_202019-01-20212813": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1871_202012-11-20204840": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1372_202106-04-2021275": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_250_202019-02-2020455": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_787_202126-02-20211548": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_690_202011-06-2020581": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_395_202126-02-20211533": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1126_202017-08-2020964": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1796_202012-11-2020567": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1103_202110-03-20211074": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_904_202024-08-202048": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_643_202119-02-20211834": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1590_202008-10-20203224": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1857_202014-12-2020101": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_168_202121-01-20212735": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_709_202020-08-202070": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1288_202021-09-20203540": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_120_202116-01-20212851": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__49_202105-02-2021434": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2957_201905-12-2019585": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_570_202101-03-20211461": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2689_201912-12-2019368": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__178_202002-09-2020307": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1740_202027-10-20202888": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_337_202129-01-20212490": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1477_202024-09-20205660": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_363_202008-01-20212973": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__141_202115-03-2021741": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_312_202108-02-20212135": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1027_202006-08-2020138": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_229_202026-02-2020342": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__624_202021-05-20201963": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__88_202101-03-2021335": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_401_202109-02-20212081": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__663_202028-05-20201922": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2437_201901-10-20191692": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__201_202106-04-202160": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2258_201920-09-20191891": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3114_201918-12-201953": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2583_201921-10-20191169": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__24_202119-01-20211093": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1809_202005-11-20204929": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_356_202103-02-20212333": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_185_202106-02-20212174": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__184_202004-09-2020297": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__679_202001-06-20201908": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1273_202031-08-20206296": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1394_202029-09-20203373": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2975_201906-12-2019563": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_63_202030-01-2020264": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2324_201931-08-20192430": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__45_202102-02-20211033": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_171_202028-02-2020272": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1970_202018-12-202052": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1565_202112-04-2021129": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__989_202015-07-20201343": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1804_202116-04-20213101": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1411_202130-03-2021499": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1818_202002-12-2020406": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1838_202011-11-2020607": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1308_202007-09-20206066": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1216_202025-08-2020873": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2681_201905-09-20197131": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1875_202129-04-202139": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__16_202028-02-2020482": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__19_202120-01-2021507": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__96_202102-03-2021323": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1858_202015-12-202079": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1742_202028-10-20205019": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3187_201923-12-201913": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_42_202119-03-2021815": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2837_201901-11-2019911": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__64_202118-02-2021383": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1537_202001-10-20205528": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_39_202111-01-20212935": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2668_201917-10-20191253": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2802_201925-10-2019997": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__71_202110-02-2021962": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_190_202027-02-2020317": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__161_202124-03-2021139": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1763_202009-11-20202585": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1867_202007-12-2020364": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1645_202116-04-202155": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_665_202017-06-2020511": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__110_202024-06-202085": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1574_202008-10-20203223": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_616_202010-06-2020596": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_968_202024-07-2020182": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6_202003-01-2020553": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_552_202003-06-2020658": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__693_202003-06-20201886": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__846_202023-06-20201675": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__124_202007-07-202068": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_494_201918-12-20199": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1771_202109-04-20213220": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2879_201901-11-2019916": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1259_202005-10-20203262": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_440_201931-10-2019288": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__175_202115-03-2021742": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2145_201930-08-20192454": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1602_202128-04-202114": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_441_202104-02-20212283": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1547_202116-04-202146": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_445_202104-02-20212287": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1603_202008-10-20203227": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2505_201931-10-2019938": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1522_202003-11-20202669": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__61_202012-03-202042": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1818_202005-11-20204936": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__95_202021-09-2020614": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_687_202119-02-20211840": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_272_202006-03-2020161": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__106_202103-03-2021306": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1686_202021-10-20205110": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1635_202014-10-20205325": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1980_202022-12-20203901": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__929_202007-07-20201464": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1708_202021-10-20205130": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_132_202119-01-20212811": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1839_202011-11-2020608": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1306_202014-09-20203598": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2596_201930-08-20197319": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1664_202106-04-20213307": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_384_201919-09-2019389": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_738_202109-03-20211118": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1617_202102-04-20213465": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_700_202019-06-2020488": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2138_201906-09-20197088": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__153_202028-10-2020467": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_411_201910-10-2019346": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1587_202014-10-20203100": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1116_202005-08-20201021": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__95_202102-03-2021322": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_574_202118-02-20211890": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1584_202013-10-20203136": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_700_202108-03-20211171": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1849_202120-04-20213076": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_416_202103-02-20212342": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1592_202013-10-20205342": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__123_202109-03-2021258": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__105_202103-03-2021305": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__214_202108-04-202138": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3352_201903-12-20195795": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3249_201906-12-20195668": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1705_202022-10-20202927": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_732_202123-02-20211680": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1703_202029-10-20202857": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_467_201906-12-2019198": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__221_202014-10-2020209": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3166_201922-10-20196209": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_788_202018-08-202086": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1083_202004-09-20203686": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_467_202105-02-20212228": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_195_201905-09-201910939": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_607_202122-02-20211740": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_488_202110-02-20212048": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_25_202119-01-20212801": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1104_202005-08-20201009": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__93_202029-05-2020110": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__52_202108-02-2021427": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1751_202028-10-20205028": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1487_202006-10-20203246": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1340_202007-09-20206074": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_297_202123-02-20211659": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1412_202028-09-20203401": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_922_202130-03-2021490": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8_202003-01-2020554": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1155_202122-03-2021738": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1086_202004-08-20201059": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__20_202018-02-2020120": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2657_201910-10-20191440": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__163_202124-03-2021141": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__10_202111-01-2021531": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1577_202015-10-20203062": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1366_202008-09-20206019": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2350_201924-09-20191828": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1062_202120-03-2021794": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__966_202009-07-20201399": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__124_202025-09-2020608": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1026_202026-08-202010": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_360_201922-08-201913": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__5_202104-01-2021546": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__951_202007-07-20201477": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1713_202116-04-202160": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_965_202104-03-20211344": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1109_202005-08-20201014": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_900_202025-08-202024": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1741_202002-11-20202696": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__13_202014-02-2020140": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_208_201926-07-2019646": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2638_201931-10-2019946": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_493_201916-12-201926": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_78_202116-01-20212850": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1969_201904-10-20191611": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__60_202109-02-2021425": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_135_202125-01-20212649": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1960_202018-12-20203952": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1843_202012-11-2020576": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2750_201907-11-2019757": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_358_202012-01-20212918": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1349_202029-09-20203371": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1895_202004-12-2020380": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__819_202022-06-20201697": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__150_202004-08-202020": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__746_202012-06-20201804": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_23_202013-01-2020376": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_443_201905-11-2019272": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1500_202028-09-20203406": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3511_201910-12-20195588": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1197_202024-09-20203451": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1038_202005-08-2020147": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__596_202019-05-20201986": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1429_202117-04-202129": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_450_201903-12-2019225": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__257_202004-01-2021548": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__955_202008-07-20201430": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_209_201923-07-2019662": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2366_201903-10-20191654": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1903_202014-12-2020103": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_362_202102-02-20212385": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_94_202018-02-2020493": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2899_201903-12-2019635": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3640_201924-12-20192484": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1159_202008-09-20203646": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_613_202117-02-20211951": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1965_201920-08-2019220": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1334_202014-09-20203601": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1505_202109-04-2021155": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__117_202105-03-2021284": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1971_202022-12-20203897": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1332_202008-09-20206000": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__102_202102-03-2021329": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__34_202012-03-2020463": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1477_202113-04-202179": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_628_202009-06-2020619": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__52_202004-03-202071": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1672_202120-04-202114": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_854_202030-09-20203319": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1802_202014-12-20204001": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__257_202109-04-2021575": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1586_202015-10-20203063": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_938_202017-07-2020249": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1344_202107-04-2021227": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1051_202025-08-202033": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__683_202015-07-20201338": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1507_202112-04-2021124": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1268_202028-08-20206330": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1715_202106-04-20213347": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1417_202125-03-2021604": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_780_202008-07-2020307": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_958_202112-03-20211036": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1646_202014-10-20205334": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__26_202121-01-2021498": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_967_202020-07-2020232": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_475_202105-02-20212233": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2451_201930-08-20197305": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1393_202130-03-2021496": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_724_202023-06-2020471": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1364_202131-03-2021469": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1228_202026-08-2020813": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__35_202121-01-20211077": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3112_201917-10-20196273": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_117_202128-01-20212534": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1331_202004-09-20206135": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3194_201923-10-20196200": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1458_202023-09-20205705": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1697_202022-10-20202923": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_790_202103-03-20211367": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__225_202016-10-2020198": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1303_202004-09-20206120": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_817_202001-07-2020389": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__593_202020-05-20201970": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3055_201916-12-201990": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1564_202108-04-2021198": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1166_202004-09-20203692": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_691_202119-02-20211844": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1434_202029-09-20205586": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3209_201925-10-20196141": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_99_202027-02-2020310": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_205_202026-02-2020356": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1580_202101-04-20213491": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__930_202007-07-20201465": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_942_202026-08-20205": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__65_202112-02-2021401": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_424_202103-02-20212346": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_327_201930-07-2019136": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3227_201931-10-20196105": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1502_202013-10-20203128": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_633_202103-03-20211363": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__594_202019-05-20201984": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_941_202018-07-2020234": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1382_202014-09-20205905": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1338_202007-09-20206072": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2462_201921-09-20191878": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1502_202112-04-2021122": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_286_202127-01-20212601": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1927_202007-12-2020367": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1934_202014-12-20204005": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2010_202024-12-20207": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__866_202024-06-20201658": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__80_202020-03-20202": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_397_201905-09-201910248": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1588_202101-04-20213496": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1086_202009-09-20203624": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2473_201904-12-2019606": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1485_202024-09-20205666": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_523_202111-02-20212018": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__44_202017-03-2020456": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2929_201906-12-2019560": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1822_202117-04-20213085": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1752_202028-10-20205029": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1422_202023-09-20203495": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2776_201920-09-20196537": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__117_202016-07-202047": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_263_201931-10-201910633": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__656_202027-05-20201932": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__159_202124-03-2021137": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_196_202127-01-20212596": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_812_202009-07-2020290": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__814_202017-06-20201777": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_978_202125-03-2021583": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2008_201929-08-201917": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1496_202113-04-202180": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1157_202007-09-20203668": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1094_202004-08-20201066": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2463_201921-10-20191160": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_117_202020-02-2020427": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_227_202121-01-20212744": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_896_202009-07-2020295": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__36_202026-02-202092": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__245_202107-04-2021591": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3603_201916-12-20193882": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3533_201911-12-20195556": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3118_201917-10-20196279": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1871_202128-04-202152": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3025_201910-12-2019468": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3016_201911-12-2019418": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__155_202004-08-202024": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1063_202022-07-20201172": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1014_202014-09-20203589": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__265_202113-04-2021562": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1760_202002-11-20202699": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1136_202112-03-20211043": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1961_202022-12-202025": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1878_202011-11-2020612": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1_202101-01-2021551": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_589_202026-06-2020430": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_192_202125-01-20212653": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1775_202109-04-20213223": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1050_202001-10-20203286": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1359_202008-09-20206012": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1625_202013-10-20205349": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1941_201924-10-20191025": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1730_202023-10-20205053": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2_202104-01-20211120": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__631_202021-05-20201965": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1360_202008-09-20206013": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1171_202025-08-2020861": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__179_202004-09-2020294": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1877_202012-11-2020582": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1672_202021-10-20202963": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1641_202002-11-20202693": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2176_201909-12-2019493": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1600_202113-04-202192": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__116_202030-06-202074": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_18_202009-01-2020399": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_908_202109-03-20211135": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_635_202109-03-20211114": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_176_202123-02-20211656": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_268_202109-02-20212077": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1048_202021-07-20201209": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_12_202121-01-20212729": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_354_202103-02-20212331": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1772_202109-04-20213221": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2019_202006-01-20213021": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_364_202022-05-2020738": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1307_202119-03-2021847": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1394_202016-09-20205837": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__192_202106-04-2021614": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_630_202103-03-20211361": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_125_202017-03-202067": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_91_202019-03-202016": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1785_202113-04-20213127": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_123_202006-03-2020144": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_309_201906-12-2019467": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__845_202023-06-20201674": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1091_202115-03-20211006": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_298_202013-01-20212886": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1355_202025-09-20203437": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_574_202003-06-2020664": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3110_201916-10-20196308": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_903_202130-03-2021489": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1930_202010-12-2020338": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1394_202130-03-2021497": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1259_202028-08-20206323": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1113_202005-08-20201018": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1489_202025-09-20205640": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1164_202112-03-20211047": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1006_202112-03-20211037": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1081_202031-08-20203778": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_313_201905-12-2019472": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_212_201930-07-2019631": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_534_202109-02-20212095": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__629_202020-05-20201982": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2365_201904-10-20191616": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1559_202126-03-20213577": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1455_202023-09-20205702": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_281_202127-01-20212599": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1367_202009-09-20205963": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_161_202026-02-2020348": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_122_202119-01-20212810": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_722_202026-06-2020434": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1661_202117-04-202139": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_894_202017-07-2020243": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_629_202015-06-2020552": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2056_201927-08-201999": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_752_202109-03-20211119": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3417_201904-12-20195766": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_319_201924-12-201910272": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1577_202116-04-202149": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_813_202115-03-2021996": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_842_202112-03-20211034": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_910_202025-08-202025": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_624_202117-02-20211953": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__603_202020-05-20201972": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1011_202101-04-2021424": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2747_201920-09-20196511": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__168_202124-03-2021146": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1460_202126-03-2021559": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_521_202122-02-20211734": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1596_202003-12-2020355": "DENIED", + "Bail_1707_201903-09-20191459": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1133_202006-10-2020897": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1454_202010-11-2020535": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1932_201904-10-2019964": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_119_202013-02-2020300": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1428_202018-11-2020490": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1841_201917-09-20191221": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1031_202001-10-2020945": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2349_201904-12-2019300": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_492_202018-05-2020646": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_902_202007-08-202074": "DENIED", + "Bail_2068_201904-11-2019656": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2255_201927-11-2019420": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1540_202026-11-2020408": "DENIED", + "Bail_2166_201920-11-2019497": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_893_202014-08-202051": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_833_202126-04-20214": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1144_202025-09-2020995": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1401_202003-11-2020612": "DENIED", + "Bail_56_202024-01-2020523": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_698_202020-06-2020348": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_190_202003-03-2020128": "DENIED", + "Bail_2303_201928-11-2019401": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_946_202031-08-20201138": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_731_202022-06-2020343": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_951_202007-09-20201116": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_355_202012-05-2020704": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_917_202031-08-20201137": "DENIED", + "Bail_1356_201919-07-2019567": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1301_202019-10-2020710": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_814_202017-07-2020245": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2405_201906-01-2020773": "DENIED", + "Bail_1740_201902-09-20191486": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1325_201919-07-2019561": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1446_201927-07-2019444": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1353_202029-10-2020644": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_891_202006-08-202079": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1553_201908-08-2019281": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1320_202014-10-2020773": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1566_201908-08-2019284": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2480_201906-01-2020774": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2477_201923-12-201916": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2401_201917-12-2019110": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_375_202009-07-2020747": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_624_202012-06-2020411": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1415_202003-11-2020614": "DENIED", + "Bail_1635_201929-08-201911": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_204_202025-02-2020199": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_383_202020-05-2020602": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1177_202025-09-2020996": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1049_202018-09-20201068": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1692_201927-08-201959": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1506_201901-08-2019381": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1802_201911-09-20191371": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_827_202027-07-2020156": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1307_202012-10-2020817": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_578_202020-08-2020735": "DENIED", + "Bail_1815_201913-09-20191338": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_450_202018-05-2020637": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_913_202018-08-202038": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_40_202011-02-2020337": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1928_201903-10-2019985": "GRANTED", + "Bail_185_202027-01-2020512": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1624_202018-12-202091": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2493_201906-01-2020775": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1053_202018-09-20201071": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1471_201903-08-2019351": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_228_202003-03-2020134": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_916_202020-08-202018": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1165_202029-09-2020977": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_598_202030-05-2020541": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_640_202011-06-2020423": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_610_202016-06-2020391": "DENIED", + "Bail_2298_201910-12-2019211": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1334_202007-11-2020553": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_769_202030-07-2020102": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_727_202017-07-2020234": "DENIED", + "Bail_15_202003-01-2020795": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_182_202016-05-2020802": "DENIED", + "Bail_2083_201925-10-2019727": "DENIED", + "Bail_65_202013-01-2020698": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_454_202014-05-2020684": "DENIED", + "Bail_2461_201919-12-201986": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_785_202008-09-20201105": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1488_202010-11-2020540": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1248_201920-07-2019535": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1467_202020-11-2020474": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_476_202021-05-2020587": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1219_202005-10-2020937": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_62_202005-02-2020408": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2076_201930-10-2019706": "DENIED", + "Bail_2377_201906-12-2019265": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1704_202018-12-202097": "DENIED", + "Bail_2334_201906-12-2019263": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1882_201920-09-20191151": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2294_201927-11-2019432": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_768_202115-04-202114": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1323_201916-07-2019631": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1669_202015-12-2020144": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1227_202005-10-2020939": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_146_202018-02-2020242": "DENIED", + "Bail_1811_201913-09-20191336": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_990_202007-09-20201119": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2471_201920-12-201956": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1346_201917-07-2019613": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_74_202025-02-2020190": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_120_202011-05-2020832": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1457_202011-11-2020512": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1673_201928-08-201936": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_812_202017-07-2020243": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_873_202007-08-202070": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1374_202007-11-2020557": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1719_202023-12-202020": "GRANTED", + "Bail_42_202008-01-2020748": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1351_202030-10-2020639": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2302_201928-11-2019400": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1601_202005-12-2020325": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1883_201920-09-20191152": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1479_202027-11-2020390": "DENIED", + "Bail_2045_201916-10-2019864": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1599_202001-12-2020373": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_301_202012-03-202053": "DENIED", + "Bail_93_202014-01-2020679": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1175_202001-10-2020953": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2313_201904-12-2019297": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1485_201906-08-2019318": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1819_201903-10-2019977": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1704_202018-12-202096": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2473_201920-12-201958": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1306_202013-10-2020798": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2148_201907-11-2019637": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2342_201905-12-2019281": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_72_202007-02-2020395": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1475_202010-11-2020538": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1531_202025-11-2020423": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_580_202006-06-2020455": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1642_202010-12-2020267": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_805_202024-07-2020166": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_184_202016-05-2020804": "DENIED", + "Bail_2244_201903-12-2019315": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1450_202027-11-2020388": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2304_201928-11-2019402": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2485_201902-01-2020809": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_615_202004-06-2020484": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2011_201914-10-2019896": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_925_202024-08-20204": "DENIED", + "Bail_1818_201911-09-20191374": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1766_202023-12-202022": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_620_202006-06-2020460": "DENIED", + "Bail_2021_201918-10-2019828": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1373_201926-07-2019453": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1662_201922-08-201999": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1443_202025-11-2020418": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1487_201902-08-2019362": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1935_201904-10-2019965": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_169_202025-02-2020194": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_339_202019-05-2020619": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1045_202024-09-20201000": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_31_202014-02-2020282": "DENIED", + "Bail_1768_201904-09-20191443": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1474_202011-11-2020517": "GRANTED", + "Bail_181_202027-01-2020510": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1385_202029-10-2020652": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_54_202007-02-2020390": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_170_202015-05-2020814": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1008_202018-09-20201063": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1632_202016-12-2020119": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2090_201923-10-2019762": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1458_201930-07-2019420": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_141_202013-05-2020823": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1427_202024-11-2020431": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1090_202021-09-20201030": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2126_201907-11-2019634": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_553_202027-05-2020562": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1793_201911-09-20191367": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2420_201912-12-2019177": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_580_202020-08-2020737": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_165_202015-05-2020811": "DENIED", + "Bail_1737_201931-08-20191503": "GRANTED", + "Bail_201_202031-01-2020451": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2254_201923-11-2019467": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1697_202018-12-202095": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_35_202013-02-2020296": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1159_202030-09-2020961": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_123_202011-05-2020835": "DENIED", + "Bail_1623_201919-08-2019168": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2220_201919-11-2019510": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1258_202009-10-2020837": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1983_201918-10-2019825": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1115_202029-09-2020970": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1611_201917-08-2019194": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2100_201930-10-2019708": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1228_202023-11-2020446": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1507_202030-11-2020378": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_11_202012-02-2020318": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2455_201923-12-201910": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2069_201921-10-2019791": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_94_202013-02-2020298": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_730_202014-07-2020292": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1270_202012-10-2020815": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_114_202012-02-2020328": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1846_201917-09-20191226": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1634_201922-08-201997": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1807_201911-09-20191373": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1572_202007-12-2020306": "DENIED", + "Bail_2079_201923-10-2019761": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1240_202006-10-2020914": "GRANTED", + "Bail_54_202013-01-2020697": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1847_201917-09-20191227": "GRANTED", + "Bail_31_202009-01-2020730": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1535_202023-12-202018": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_199_202011-05-2020718": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_685_202022-06-2020341": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_585_202006-06-2020456": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_973_202008-09-20201109": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_15_202001-02-2020436": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1598_202001-12-2020372": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1780_202022-12-202050": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_77_202014-02-2020283": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_298_202009-06-2020758": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_371_202016-05-2020652": "GRANTED", + "Bail_199_202031-01-2020450": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2173_201916-11-2019540": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_106_202014-02-2020285": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1278_202020-10-2020682": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2171_201915-11-2019555": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2129_201914-11-2019566": "DENIED", + "Bail_1256_201915-07-2019638": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_420_202014-07-2020745": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_384_202012-05-2020711": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1534_202005-12-2020320": "DENIED", + "Bail_1509_201902-08-2019365": "GRANTED", + "Bail_63_202009-01-2020734": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1024_202005-10-2020920": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_548_202028-05-2020552": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1555_201908-08-2019283": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1730_202022-12-202041": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2416_201917-12-2019111": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2279_201927-11-2019426": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1346_202021-10-2020673": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1213_201910-07-2019696": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1048_202018-09-20201067": "GRANTED", + "Bail_7_202004-01-2020782": "DENIED", + "Bail_1374_201922-07-2019520": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1350_202020-10-2020692": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_12_202012-02-2020319": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2033_201915-10-2019879": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_192_202018-05-2020798": "DENIED", + "Bail_26_202013-01-2020694": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2184_201912-11-2019603": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_782_202024-08-20201": "DENIED", + "Bail_1395_201920-07-2019549": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1604_202004-12-2020343": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2179_201913-11-2019589": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_672_202012-06-2020417": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1050_202018-09-20201069": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1206_202009-10-2020829": "DENIED", + "Bail_1388_201930-07-2019411": "DENIED", + "Bail_2292_201927-11-2019430": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1544_201907-08-2019304": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1644_201927-08-201951": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1630_202016-12-2020117": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1958_201905-10-2019948": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1211_201910-07-2019694": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_529_202027-05-2020559": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1518_202004-12-2020339": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1778_202021-12-202073": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_140_202013-05-2020822": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1740_202021-12-202070": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_169_202015-05-2020813": "DENIED", + "Bail_2414_201920-12-201947": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1068_202021-09-20201021": "DENIED", + "Bail_205_202029-01-2020469": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_117_202013-02-2020299": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_111_202015-02-2020268": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1318_202016-10-2020735": "DENIED", + "Bail_2257_201903-12-2019316": "GRANTED", + "Bail_88_202013-01-2020701": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_868_202031-07-202094": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1648_201921-08-2019123": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_360_202019-06-2020749": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1259_202009-10-2020838": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_158_202026-02-2020181": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2341_201903-12-2019332": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_197_202019-05-2020794": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_900099_201928-08-201928": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_311_202022-05-2020702": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_500100_201931-05-20191011": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_200052_201906-06-2019917": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100788_201916-11-2019495": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_470_202024-06-2020472": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100536_201913-08-2019146": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_400102_201918-09-20191119": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_309_202020-05-2020735": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1000067_201930-05-20191042": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_56_202014-08-20201072": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500255_201919-07-2019410": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500378_201904-10-2019889": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_129_202026-02-2020188": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500241_201904-07-2019640": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_90_202024-01-2020612": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_855_202003-10-20201048": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_98_202004-03-202093": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_141_202023-01-2020641": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100792_201914-11-2019536": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100359_201929-05-20191047": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500380_201904-10-2019891": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1000015_201903-06-2019969": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100778_201906-11-2019608": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_154_202003-03-2020128": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_200087_201905-08-2019219": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_159_202022-12-20202014": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_60_202019-02-2020266": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_150_202027-01-2020593": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100675_201927-09-2019979": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_300174_201916-12-201979": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500107_201903-06-2019967": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_668_202024-08-202047": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_990_202012-11-2020742": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_300083_201913-05-20191254": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_924_202021-10-2020912": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_300202_201902-01-2020847": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500071_201911-06-2019851": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500235_201902-07-2019670": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_300164_201915-10-2019813": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_300178_201926-11-2019352": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_300173_201913-11-2019557": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100910_201903-01-2020827": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_500191_201915-06-2019820": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_189_202007-03-202045": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500299_201927-08-201942": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_400113_201925-10-2019681": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500133_201906-06-2019922": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_141_202027-11-20202085": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_300195_201903-01-2020830": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100808_201920-11-2019445": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1044_202002-12-2020619": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100376_201914-06-2019825": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500257_201920-07-2019384": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_300177_201922-10-2019736": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_532_202006-07-2020384": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_500112_201904-06-2019948": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1600165_201909-10-201956": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100722_201917-10-2019773": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_360_202029-05-2020659": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_259_202016-05-2020766": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_936_202019-10-2020923": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_200035_201908-05-20191288": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_96_202024-09-20202205": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500346_201920-09-20191074": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_869_202007-10-2020992": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_300197_201904-01-2020810": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_614_202007-08-2020171": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_189_202029-01-2020560": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1000017_201926-06-2019734": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_300107_201925-07-2019347": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500182_201914-06-2019834": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500272_201905-08-2019220": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_31_202010-06-20201100": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_40_202012-02-2020316": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_543_202123-04-20214": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_981_202002-11-2020851": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_97_202028-02-2020145": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_300147_201903-10-2019909": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500353_201925-09-20191015": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500093_201930-05-20191040": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100903_201920-12-201931": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_627_202010-08-2020163": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_225_202002-06-2020644": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500180_201914-06-2019832": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500337_201917-09-20191144": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_13_202017-01-2020709": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100831_201926-11-2019350": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500279_201905-08-2019227": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_136_202019-02-2020260": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100822_201920-11-2019450": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_677_202024-08-202050": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_55_202013-08-20201073": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100713_201914-10-2019831": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500055_201921-05-20191182": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_390_202008-06-2020611": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_70_202018-02-2020283": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_500205_201918-06-2019803": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_938_202028-10-2020871": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_200102_201911-09-20191291": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_856_202029-09-20201063": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_57_202024-02-2020226": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100683_201905-10-2019870": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500181_201614-06-2019833": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_680_202026-08-20202": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101_202028-09-20202198": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500388_201911-10-2019846": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500357_201927-09-2019982": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500316_201912-09-20191275": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_359_202029-05-2020658": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_400066_201901-07-2019682": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_24_202016-01-2020722": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_255_202027-05-2020674": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_780_202014-09-20201137": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2_202001-02-2020512": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500341_201918-09-20191122": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500305_201928-08-201926": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_58_202023-01-2020629": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_734_202002-09-20201231": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100794_201907-11-2019594": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100892_201912-12-2019169": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_300118_201919-07-2019404": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_95_202024-09-20202204": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100790_201916-11-2019497": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500250_201918-07-2019425": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_200065_201903-07-2019647": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_14_202013-01-2020765": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_674_202025-08-202030": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_679_202021-08-202057": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1121_202015-12-2020104": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500340_201918-09-20191121": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_942_202011-11-2020761": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_500101_201931-05-20191012": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_690_202024-08-202052": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_431_202019-06-2020528": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500292_201917-08-2019122": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_406_202012-06-2020584": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_300184_201916-11-2019501": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_886_202022-10-2020894": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100856_201930-11-2019285": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100754_201916-11-2019488": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102_202026-02-2020183": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_571_202023-07-2020296": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_600_202030-07-2020220": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4_202020-01-2020685": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100797_201913-11-2019554": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_598_202030-07-2020218": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_382_202008-06-2020609": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500204_201918-06-2019802": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500140_201907-06-2019903": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100840_201905-12-2019234": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_96_202028-02-2020150": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_715_202004-09-20201212": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1012_202018-11-2020718": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500097_201931-05-20191008": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_84_202015-09-20202210": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_417_202116-04-202142": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_300180_201912-11-2019574": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_66_202019-06-2020524": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_251_202015-05-2020774": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100872_201903-12-2019259": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100827_201923-11-2019390": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_300199_201903-01-2020831": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100534_201917-08-2019119": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100819_201920-11-2019447": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_113_202022-01-2020658": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_46_202010-02-2020359": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_78_202022-01-2020653": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1000027_201927-09-2019984": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_498_202025-06-2020467": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_500336_201917-09-20191143": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_641_202017-08-202097": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_200050_201904-06-2019941": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_400_202010-06-2020598": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500124_201904-06-2019960": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_682_202020-08-202069": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_456_202018-06-2020545": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500192_201915-06-2019821": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_553_202021-07-2020315": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_525_202002-07-2020433": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_41_202010-02-2020357": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500270_201902-08-2019250": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500318_201913-09-20191256": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100705_201923-11-2019387": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_300121_201906-08-2019200": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_658_202019-08-202082": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100908_201903-01-2020826": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_200044_201925-05-20191123": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_155_202024-01-2020615": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_604_202010-08-2020161": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_20_202003-06-2020629": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_300194_201921-01-2020681": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1006_202013-11-2020734": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_500088_201929-05-20191065": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_300166_201910-10-2019859": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500253_201919-07-2019408": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500302_201927-08-201945": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500120_201904-06-2019955": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_109_202029-05-2020653": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500183_201914-06-2019835": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_300114_201909-07-2019577": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_479_202024-06-2020474": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_280_202021-05-2020714": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_39_202028-02-2020148": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_61_202014-01-2020738": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_742_202009-09-20201159": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_506_202006-07-2020382": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_200034_201908-05-20191287": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100763_201925-10-2019676": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500261_201924-07-2019359": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_79_202022-01-2020654": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_97_202024-09-20202206": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_67_202025-02-2020207": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_378_202010-06-2020595": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500096_201931-05-20191007": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_593_202007-08-2020168": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_900123_201918-12-201959": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_373_202011-06-2020590": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1000022_201929-06-2019700": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_80_202026-11-2020638": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_242_202019-05-2020741": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1000030_201901-10-2019943": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_697_202027-08-20201307": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500160_201911-06-2019852": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100395_201910-06-2019871": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_187_202007-03-202044": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_500158_201910-06-2019883": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_396_202016-06-2020554": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_200043_201925-05-20191122": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_500249_201915-07-2019450": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100559_201921-09-20191046": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_745_202003-09-20201224": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_499_202109-04-202183": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_300163_201926-09-2019998": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_776_202014-09-20201136": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_500368_201903-10-2019919": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500186_201914-06-2019837": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_544_202020-07-2020323": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_137_202023-01-2020637": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_300160_201926-09-2019997": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500267_201930-07-2019294": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_400056_201922-06-2019759": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_200143_201911-12-2019180": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_168_202027-01-2020598": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100845_201906-12-2019215": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500056_201921-05-20191183": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_400054_201931-05-20191004": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500163_201911-06-2019853": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100755_201916-11-2019489": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_671_202019-08-202085": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100730_201917-10-2019774": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_36_202007-02-2020423": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_954_202005-11-2020827": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_85_202015-09-20202211": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_500243_201905-07-2019622": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_732_202002-09-20201230": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_500258_201920-07-2019385": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_56_202023-01-2020628": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_164_202025-02-2020202": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_603_202116-04-202153": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_49_202028-07-20201083": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100753_201915-11-2019515": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500371_201903-10-2019922": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_320_202029-05-2020655": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500171_201911-06-2019860": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_481_202023-06-2020484": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_300096_201921-06-2019770": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_592_202029-07-2020238": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100919_201913-01-2020772": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100777_201915-11-2019516": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_580_202122-04-202115": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_92_202007-09-20201170": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_296_202016-05-2020772": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_500063_201925-05-20191125": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_200_202026-05-2020684": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_500354_201926-09-2019999": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1600177_201923-10-201949": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_180_202028-01-2020576": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_374_202116-03-2021409": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1127_201909-07-20191212": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_541_202103-03-20212948": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_450_202125-02-20213166": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_783_201904-05-20192234": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_547_202126-04-202112": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1138_202009-10-2020963": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1974_201911-10-20191212": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1798_201919-09-20191644": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_970_201901-06-20191702": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_402_202124-02-20213232": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_129419_202020-11-20203284": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1606_201927-09-20191457": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_665_201903-05-20192255": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2389_201902-12-2019423": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_637_202110-03-20212605": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1217_201910-07-20191189": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_895_201924-05-20191916": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_622_202026-06-2020741": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_121_202129-01-20211312": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1080_201927-06-20191431": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1417_201908-08-2019450": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_12153_202019-09-20205006": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_616_202108-03-20212673": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_12141_202028-08-20205302": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1158_202012-10-2020947": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1511_201920-08-2019211": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1131_202003-10-20201066": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_404_202116-03-2021414": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_354_202118-03-2021354": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_911_202106-04-20212016": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_652_202112-03-20212582": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1175_202019-09-20205009": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_591_202120-04-202114": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_362_202123-02-20213327": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_432_202116-03-2021418": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_241_202006-03-2020124": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1318_201924-07-2019678": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_129351_202021-10-20203682": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1865_201911-10-20191206": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_164_202117-02-2021957": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_121_202128-01-20214241": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_943_202107-04-20211949": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_355_202110-03-2021511": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_453_202125-02-20213169": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1450_201920-08-2019203": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2383_201924-12-201913": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_915_202005-09-20201428": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_138_202010-06-2020819": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1834_201901-10-20191371": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_200_202109-02-20211095": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_129334_202012-10-20204674": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1286_202020-11-2020406": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_140_202128-01-20211351": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_945_202107-04-20211951": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1116_201929-06-20191407": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_620_202030-06-2020714": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102_202128-01-20211345": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_914_201929-05-20191817": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1411_202008-12-2020266": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_181_202102-02-20214049": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1107_202005-10-20201057": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_20_202001-02-2020711": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_291_202017-03-202040": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1642_201929-08-201925": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_408_202124-02-20213238": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_225_202109-02-20213721": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_237_202112-02-20213603": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1994_201918-01-2020888": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_704_202008-09-20205189": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_573_202026-06-2020740": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8_202105-01-20214752": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2178_201926-10-2019892": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_782_202027-08-20201561": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_616_202109-03-20212619": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_951_201929-05-20191819": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_195_202106-02-20213822": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_567_202106-03-20212759": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1829_201918-10-20191061": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_161_202103-02-20214002": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_177_202104-02-20213951": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1546_202027-01-20211379": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_829_201922-05-20191942": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_30_202113-01-20214600": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1957_201905-10-20191303": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_796_202101-04-20212156": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_439_202125-02-20213155": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_202_202109-02-20213700": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_528_202011-06-2020811": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1435_202010-12-2020223": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_129418_202020-11-20203283": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_129444_202004-12-20203147": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_329_202125-02-20213140": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_56_202130-01-20214118": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_901_202106-04-20212006": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_129484_202015-12-20201814": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_129391_202011-11-20203372": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1090_202001-10-20201082": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_991_202109-04-20211871": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_443_202102-04-2021225": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_129400_202013-11-20203335": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_487_202117-04-202125": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1165_202019-10-2020827": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_129338_202015-10-20204577": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1837_201921-09-20191583": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1030_201929-06-20191404": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1096_201904-07-20191313": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_190_202105-02-20213887": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_224_202112-02-20211028": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_129343_202015-10-20204582": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_943_201930-05-20191772": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1046_202001-10-20201078": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_752_202116-03-20212479": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_401_202106-03-2021577": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1115_201926-06-20191453": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_543_202103-03-20212950": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_394_202123-02-20213356": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_495_202102-03-20213010": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_794_202125-03-20212216": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1700_201926-09-20191483": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_841_202001-09-20201486": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1119_202007-10-20201010": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_613_202109-03-20212616": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_12146_202028-08-20205307": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_303_202117-02-20213522": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101_202010-02-2020511": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_711_202116-03-20212441": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_644_202004-07-2020585": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_635_202116-03-20212421": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_965_201930-05-20191775": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_716_202116-03-20212444": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1579_201929-08-201921": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_261_202112-02-20213627": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1327_202007-11-2020579": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1061_202023-09-20201184": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_24_202108-01-20214681": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_684_202115-03-20212541": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_143_202130-01-20214129": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1971_201930-09-20191423": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_129340_202015-10-20204579": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_211_202109-02-20213708": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_354_202123-02-20213319": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_12146_202008-09-20205182": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2346_201927-11-2019475": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_129498_202018-12-20201719": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_566_202106-03-20212758": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_433_202103-04-2021197": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1152_201929-06-20191408": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_492_202102-03-20213007": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2565_201910-02-2020509": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_563_202106-03-20212755": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1941_201930-09-20191420": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_923_202106-04-20212029": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_41_202005-02-2020645": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1135_201927-06-20191433": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2106_201926-10-2019881": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1450_202009-12-2020245": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_919_202106-04-20212025": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_662_202109-04-20211827": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_12151_202018-09-20205028": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1285_202020-11-2020405": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_656_202112-03-20212585": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_446_202125-02-20213162": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_207_202109-02-20213704": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_986_201920-06-20191515": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1206_201915-07-20191016": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2527_201907-01-20201034": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_611_202109-03-20212614": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_763_201902-05-20192277": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_608_202108-03-20212666": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_211_202006-03-2020120": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_750_202116-03-20212477": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_907_201908-07-20191240": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_485_202101-03-20213081": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_129493_202017-12-20201750": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_389_202123-02-20213351": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1118_201925-06-20191468": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_358_202123-02-20213323": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2340_201920-11-2019561": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_217_202003-03-2020218": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_9_202128-01-20211338": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_283_202117-02-20213502": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_751_202116-03-20212478": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1529_202002-01-20211775": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1317_201925-07-2019653": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_981_202108-04-20211906": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_129373_202005-11-20203518": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_786_201903-06-20191666": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_49_202006-02-2020637": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1545_202006-01-20211718": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_12147_202028-08-20205308": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_999_202016-09-20201303": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_35_202113-01-20214605": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_660_202003-07-2020618": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_145_202128-01-20211352": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1999_201918-10-20191067": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_452_202125-02-20213168": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_143_202125-01-20211396": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_105_202127-01-20214275": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1473_201920-08-2019206": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_129362_202031-10-20203606": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1574_201927-09-20191455": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2347_201927-11-2019476": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_12149_202009-09-20205164": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_619_202108-03-20212676": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_391_202109-03-2021526": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_898_202007-09-20201404": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_12148_202009-09-20205163": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_894_202106-04-20212003": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1653_201919-11-2019577": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_129460_202009-12-20203094": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_765_202028-08-20201531": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1006_201925-06-20191463": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_529_202101-04-2021278": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1086_201929-06-20191405": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_401_202124-02-20213231": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1929_201926-09-20191497": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_245_202112-02-20213611": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_838_202026-08-202017": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_295_202117-02-20213514": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_827_202101-04-20212187": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_189_202105-02-20213886": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1448_201924-08-201994": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_349_202123-02-20213315": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_482_202101-03-20213078": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_93_202120-01-20211493": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1547_202002-01-20211777": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_539_202103-03-20212946": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1042_202001-10-20201076": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2485_201931-01-2020741": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1441_201909-08-2019406": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_236_202110-02-20211071": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2460_201924-12-201919": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_52_202010-02-2020507": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_987_201910-06-20191577": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_326_202123-02-2021863": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1596_201918-09-20191669": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_99_202125-01-20214293": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_685_202115-03-20212542": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_597_202020-06-2020756": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1697_201918-09-20191673": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_675_202115-03-20212532": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_547_202016-06-2020769": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_830_202004-09-20201442": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_845_201920-05-20191988": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_656_202101-04-20212153": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_956_201901-06-20191701": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_643_202004-07-2020584": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1998_201931-10-2019834": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_444_202101-04-2021266": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_891_201903-06-20191675": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8_202115-01-20214577": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1233_202020-10-2020810": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_769_202028-08-20201534": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2253_201920-11-2019554": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_270_202112-02-20211031": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_166_202104-02-20213940": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_129461_202009-12-20203095": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2255_201916-11-2019645": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_551_202117-03-20212329": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_74_202102-03-20212987": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_409_202124-02-20213239": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1954_201924-10-2019932": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_925_201923-05-20191932": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1025_201921-06-20191498": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_856_202103-04-20212096": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_284_202117-02-20213503": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_924_201923-05-20191931": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_284_202123-02-2021857": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1073_202006-10-20201028": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_96_202122-01-20214335": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2102_201917-10-20191094": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1033_202113-04-20211799": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1497_201920-08-2019209": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_348_202123-02-20213314": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1866_201911-10-20191207": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_377_202123-02-20213340": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2254_201907-02-2020583": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_366_202123-02-20213331": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1037_202113-04-20211800": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1221_201920-07-2019804": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_840_201903-06-20191670": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_424_202124-02-20213253": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_726_202116-03-20212453": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_909_202106-04-20212014": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1285_201918-07-2019900": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1759_201918-09-20191685": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_857_201906-06-20191621": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_173_202102-03-2021683": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_852_201915-05-20192073": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100_202125-01-20214294": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_593_202120-04-202116": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_119311_202005-10-20204794": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_767_202117-03-20212341": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2437_201911-12-2019297": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1008_202109-04-20211875": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1517_201921-08-2019166": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_799_201903-05-20192263": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_514_202101-04-2021276": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_316_202117-02-20213535": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_864_201903-06-20191673": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2104_201926-10-2019880": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_372_202106-03-2021576": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_12147_202008-09-20205183": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_66_202118-01-20214543": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_708_202116-03-20212438": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_129514_202017-12-20201754": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2371_201910-12-2019315": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2000_201917-10-20191093": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_903_202106-04-20212008": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2391_201907-01-20201027": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_129357_202023-10-20203656": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_801_201904-05-20192236": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1508_201919-08-2019252": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2039_201910-10-20191248": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1423_202014-12-2020175": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_359_202123-02-20213324": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_505_202102-03-20213019": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_64_202108-02-20213755": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_438_202112-03-2021500": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_575_202127-04-20212": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_720_202116-03-20212448": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1070_201927-06-20191430": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_849_202028-08-20201539": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1175_201917-07-2019924": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_851_202027-08-20201566": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2571_201907-01-20201037": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_57_202024-01-2020772": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_990_201910-06-20191578": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_12163_202006-11-20203479": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_148_202101-02-20214080": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_350_202103-03-2021656": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_506_202102-03-20213020": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_697_202115-03-20212550": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_297_202117-02-20213516": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_764_202117-03-20212338": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1535_202018-01-20211537": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_831_201908-07-20191239": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_286_202117-02-20213505": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1320_201919-08-2019238": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1012_202109-04-20211879": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1334_201926-07-2019639": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1277_202003-11-2020661": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1788_201919-09-20191635": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_12156_202028-09-20204888": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_129443_202004-12-20203146": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4_202104-01-20214775": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1368_202019-11-2020428": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2455_201924-12-201917": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_33_202113-01-20214603": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_956_202007-09-20201416": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_635_202026-06-2020742": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1035_201918-06-20191536": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1903_201931-10-2019833": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_688_202005-09-20205236": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_281_202117-02-20213500": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_129383_202010-11-20203399": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2133_201922-10-20191018": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2120_201921-11-2019520": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_227_202109-02-20213723": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_807_202101-04-20212166": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_872_202106-04-20211992": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_68_202119-01-20214502": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_828_202101-04-20212188": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_292_202117-02-20213511": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_411_202116-03-2021416": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2494_201918-01-2020891": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_522_202102-03-20213031": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_877_202028-08-20201544": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_12142_202028-08-20205303": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_78_202128-01-20211341": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_459_202126-02-20213108": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2329_201927-11-2019472": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_862_202027-08-20201568": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1345_201903-08-2019506": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_12165_202004-09-20205252": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_82_202121-01-20214419": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_946_202107-04-20211952": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_129441_202003-12-20203167": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1178_201909-08-2019393": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1027_202029-09-20201878": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_36_202115-01-20211679": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_70_202011-02-20201346": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1225_202102-04-20211989": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_765_202010-08-2020806": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_605_202108-03-2021632": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_677_202024-07-2020910": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_153_202117-03-2021162": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_159_202010-09-2020392": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_849_202108-03-20212409": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_459_202118-02-2021996": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1097_202022-09-2020936": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_227_202106-04-202144": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1136_202125-03-20212065": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1515_202009-12-20201272": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_114_202018-02-20201241": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_21_202104-01-20213255": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_814_202018-08-2020768": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1097_202013-10-20201758": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_545_202029-05-2020532": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_767_202102-04-2021192": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_224_202007-03-20201062": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_120_202111-01-20213173": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_127_202105-03-2021230": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_597_202003-07-20201006": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_544_202125-02-2021818": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_687_202027-07-2020237": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_321_202129-01-20212992": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1161_202020-10-20201674": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_290_202112-02-20211102": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1479_202004-12-20201299": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_878_202110-03-20212359": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1434_202002-11-2020458": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1253_202013-10-2020671": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_248_202125-02-2021809": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1086_202012-10-20201772": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_546_202030-05-2020523": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_295_202126-02-2021777": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_686_202024-07-2020914": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_764_202022-07-2020271": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_946_202116-03-20212296": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_995_202119-03-20212190": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1167_202021-10-20201656": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1326_202009-11-2020339": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_712_202030-07-2020866": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_964_202117-03-20212254": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_161_202119-01-20211631": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_612_202112-03-2021563": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_198_202119-01-20213097": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1499_202024-11-2020254": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1012_202028-09-20201898": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_624_202123-03-2021358": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_898_202105-04-2021137": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1343_202025-03-20212081": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1346_202004-11-2020402": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_426_202118-02-2021993": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_939_202020-08-202053": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_429_202012-05-2020670": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_575_202118-02-20212677": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1270_202107-04-20211916": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1150_202024-09-2020920": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1453_202011-11-2020315": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_839_202108-03-20212402": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_83_202012-06-2020275": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_279_202011-05-20201261": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_451_202008-06-20201138": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1093_202123-03-20212112": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_842_202124-03-2021331": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_246_202127-01-20211466": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1057_202006-10-20201819": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_724_202123-03-2021364": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_845_202028-08-20201131": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_187_202115-02-20211069": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_793_202031-07-2020204": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_37_202029-01-2020756": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1114_202015-10-20201732": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_172_202027-02-2020274": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_108_202017-02-20201263": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_819_202112-03-20212323": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_291_202011-05-20201264": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_240_202102-02-20211299": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_424_202104-02-20212894": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_70_202107-01-20213192": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1516_202009-12-20201273": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_675_202007-07-2020979": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_711_202118-03-2021480": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_959_202108-04-202147": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_596_202016-06-2020432": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1553_202016-12-20201213": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_688_202006-07-2020317": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_813_202122-03-2021400": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_478_202012-06-20201113": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_867_202106-04-202197": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_383_202102-02-20212943": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_990_202028-09-2020876": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1541_202002-03-20212533": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_57_202010-02-20201366": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_405_202002-06-20201174": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_387_202023-06-2020393": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1455_202007-11-2020361": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_556_202105-03-2021674": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_79_202119-02-2021343": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_874_202007-08-2020161": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_952_202116-03-20212302": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_435_202005-06-20201156": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_215_202005-03-20201091": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_992_202109-04-202123": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_88_202111-02-20211110": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1138_202020-10-20201666": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1419_202006-01-20211814": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_785_202119-03-2021454": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1678_202018-01-20211658": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_870_202021-08-202029": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_336_202006-03-2020139": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_834_202021-08-2020726": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_374_202105-02-20211233": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_311_202012-05-20201258": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_252_202128-01-20211431": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_730_202102-03-20212512": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_180_202118-01-20213110": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1125_202017-10-20201700": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1189_202007-10-2020754": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1238_202105-04-20211946": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_451_202117-02-20211025": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_569_202112-03-2021559": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_758_202019-02-20212658": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_223_202018-02-2020390": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_642_202020-07-2020956": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1211_202029-10-20201606": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_972_202117-03-20212261": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_706_202126-02-20212547": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_390_202030-05-20201180": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1139_202125-03-20212068": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_512_202021-05-2020579": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_951_202024-08-202025": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_675_202110-03-2021591": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_501_202104-03-2021693": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_45_202011-02-20201339": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1028_202007-09-20201080": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1193_202030-09-2020852": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_592_202120-03-2021418": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_168_202007-02-2020644": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_963_202002-09-20201115": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_611_202119-02-20212649": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1700_202022-12-202016": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_965_202026-08-20204": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_969_202117-03-20212258": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_861_202108-04-202141": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_868_202007-08-2020159": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_64_202003-02-2020712": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1281_202022-10-2020529": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1505_202027-11-2020219": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1296_202016-10-2020643": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_567_202116-02-20212742": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_975_202028-09-20201894": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_578_202117-03-2021502": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_850_202105-04-2021133": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1464_202004-12-2020158": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_271_202011-05-20201259": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_36_202029-01-2020755": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_454_202122-02-2021925": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1067_202122-03-20212148": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_191_202019-02-2020360": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1377_202021-10-2020562": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_226_202115-02-20211071": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1157_202125-03-20212079": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1527_202009-12-2020121": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1080_202028-09-2020877": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_859_202026-08-2020681": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_825_202021-08-2020721": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_376_202103-02-20212911": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1284_202009-10-2020719": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_98_202010-02-2020582": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_606_202013-07-2020962": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_203_202025-02-2020296": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_353_202130-01-20212984": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1310_202012-11-20201467": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_77_202115-01-20211687": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_434_202005-06-20201155": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_296_202101-02-20211331": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_675_202001-07-2020347": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_325_202005-03-2020164": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1024_202029-09-20201875": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_740_202013-07-2020293": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1625_202018-12-20201179": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_205_202105-02-20211227": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1684_202011-01-20211742": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_449_202105-02-20212873": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_793_202120-03-2021430": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_184_202007-03-2020110": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_472_202109-02-20212818": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1686_202011-01-20211744": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_351_202117-02-20211017": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1313_202017-10-2020630": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1058_202122-03-20212142": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_923_202011-09-20202043": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_861_202005-10-2020783": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_292_202126-02-2021774": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_591_202126-02-2021792": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_525_202026-05-2020558": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_641_202117-03-2021505": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_681_202023-07-2020932": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1154_202020-10-20201669": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_115_202125-01-20211494": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_465_202108-02-20212852": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_85_202107-01-20213193": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1226_202003-11-20201560": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1251_202001-10-2020831": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_66_202125-01-20211491": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_183_202104-02-20211250": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1183_202005-10-2020789": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_657_202023-07-2020927": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_638_202122-02-20212630": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_452_202125-02-2021815": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_496_202110-03-2021585": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1158_202025-09-2020906": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1231_202003-11-20201562": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_743_202102-03-20212520": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_825_202108-03-20212393": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1028_202029-09-20201879": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_490_202018-05-2020609": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_857_202007-08-2020156": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1025_202005-10-2020784": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_440_202018-05-2020604": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_946_202020-08-202056": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_162_202119-01-20211632": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_326_202130-01-20212982": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_424_202029-05-2020527": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_633_202122-02-20212627": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_302_202127-01-20213027": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_253_202123-02-2021868": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_305_202102-03-2021734": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_174_202028-02-20201144": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1550_202019-12-20201154": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1126_202017-10-20201701": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_603_202118-02-20212691": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_140_202005-03-20201082": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_683_202002-07-2020338": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_710_202028-07-2020886": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_493_202015-06-20201104": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_305_202127-01-20213030": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_453_202106-02-20212858": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1209_202029-10-20201604": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1349_202027-10-2020505": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_93_202107-01-20213198": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_897_202003-09-20202099": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_373_202105-02-20211232": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_704_202027-07-2020904": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1034_202119-03-20212206": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_902_202020-08-202048": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1076_202010-09-20201035": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_151_202128-01-20211426": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_508_202020-05-2020592": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1220_202031-10-20201596": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1030_202029-09-20201881": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_871_202028-08-20202129": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_552_202123-03-2021356": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_433_202105-02-20212863": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_890_202013-08-2020130": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_749_202006-08-2020832": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_428_202006-06-20201143": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_970_202117-03-20212259": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_40_202118-01-20211647": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_256_202004-12-2020120": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_831_202021-08-2020723": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_441_202105-02-20212867": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_892_202112-03-20212327": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_379_202111-02-20211125": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1363_202027-10-2020506": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_214_202005-03-20201090": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1636_202021-12-202029": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_302_202012-05-20201254": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1583_202004-12-2020165": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1622_202018-12-20201176": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1670_202006-01-20211822": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_732_202107-04-202160": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_329_202125-03-2021290": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1481_202004-12-20201300": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1134_202125-03-20212063": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_662_202021-07-2020950": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1195_202028-10-20201608": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_582_202002-07-20201015": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1572_202016-12-20201222": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1307_202017-10-2020628": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_485_202015-06-20201100": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_387_202029-05-20201187": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_434_202013-05-2020664": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1297_202017-10-2020626": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1471_202006-11-2020376": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_133_202115-01-20213117": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_643_202116-03-2021542": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_444_202122-03-2021386": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1633_202011-12-202098": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_356_202119-02-2021969": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_379_202027-05-20201205": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_208_202121-01-20211576": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_651_202123-03-2021360": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_829_202123-03-2021373": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_10_202006-02-20201394": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_443_202016-05-2020616": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_545_202116-03-2021534": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_73_202012-02-20201321": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_784_202119-03-2021453": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1042_202008-09-20201062": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_67_202029-01-2020758": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_127_202115-01-20213116": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_406_202103-02-20212915": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_182_202119-01-20213088": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_404_202002-06-20201173": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1518_202009-12-2020120": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_913_202010-08-2020147": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1225_202005-10-2020797": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_608_202119-02-20212646": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1295_202016-10-2020642": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1581_202018-12-20201170": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_15_202001-02-20201433": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_192_202120-01-20211606": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1341_202115-04-20211886": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_835_202021-08-2020727": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_915_202105-04-2021139": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_797_202101-04-2021233": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_886_202002-09-20202114": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_935_202014-09-20202019": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1005_202118-03-20212234": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_911_202011-09-20202042": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_626_202015-06-2020444": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_332_202123-02-2021871": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_173_202025-02-2020295": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_699_202110-03-2021601": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_665_202022-06-2020402": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_138_202104-02-20211249": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_289_202011-05-20201262": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_695_202125-03-2021296": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_508_202104-03-2021697": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_82_202113-01-20211712": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_19_202106-01-20213207": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_879_202013-08-2020129": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_66_202110-02-2021391": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_276_202119-02-2021968": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_767_202010-08-2020808": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_375_202028-05-20201191": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_203_202026-05-20201207": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_561_202025-06-20201050": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_950_202021-08-202036": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7_202104-02-20211248": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_274_202125-01-20213037": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_166_202129-01-20211392": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_889_202020-08-202047": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_971_202117-03-20212260": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_322_202015-05-20201245": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_373_202101-02-20212971": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1483_202030-11-2020205": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_109_202018-02-20201236": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_813_202018-08-2020767": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6_202113-01-20211709": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1020_202014-09-20201014": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_627_202013-07-2020965": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_681_202119-03-2021452": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1421_202028-10-2020501": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_789_202104-03-20212486": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_408_202103-02-20212917": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_399_202108-02-20211196": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_214_202119-01-20213105": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1230_202029-09-2020871": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_831_202123-03-2021375": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_467_202010-06-20201125": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_964_202018-09-20201984": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1521_202019-11-2020296": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1561_202005-12-2020148": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_462_202012-06-20201112": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1084_202009-10-20201788": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_187_202018-02-2020384": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_396_202105-03-2021663": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_792_202014-08-2020784": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_814_202122-03-2021401": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_705_202022-07-2020265": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1280_202007-10-2020764": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_312_202015-05-20201243": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_80_202118-01-20211650": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_766_202010-08-2020807": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_393_202022-05-2020564": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_705_202118-03-2021478": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_893_202101-04-2021242": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_355_202116-02-20211048": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_190_202120-01-20211604": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_557_202118-03-2021470": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1229_202105-04-20211945": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_799_202105-03-20212448": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102_202017-02-20201257": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_909_202010-08-2020146": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_634_202013-07-2020969": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1693_202012-01-20211735": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1094_202022-09-2020935": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1552_202030-11-2020211": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_755_202117-03-2021513": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1589_202016-12-20201234": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_194_202120-01-20211608": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_977_202019-09-20201973": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1236_202003-11-20201566": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1625_202007-01-20211788": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_234_202104-02-20211254": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1216_202102-04-20211980": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6_202001-02-20201428": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_670_202108-03-2021635": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_125_202020-02-20201215": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_81_202007-02-2020635": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_290_202005-03-2020158": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_658_202021-07-2020945": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_235_202012-03-20201054": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_682_202026-06-2020379": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1576_202011-12-202091": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_728_202110-03-20212350": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_17_202104-01-20211857": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_751_202126-03-2021273": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_227_202115-02-20211072": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_105_202017-02-20201260": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_439_202104-03-2021691": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1144_202023-09-2020929": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_488_202027-05-2020546": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1583_202016-12-20201228": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_224_202117-02-20211014": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1695_202008-01-20211769": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_248_202124-03-20212088": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1709_202007-01-20211796": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_37_202115-01-20211680": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_607_202119-02-20212645": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1285_202012-11-20201464": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_417_202111-02-20211126": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_107_202017-02-20201262": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_870_202126-03-2021277": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_892_202014-08-2020110": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7_202105-01-20213219": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_495_202105-03-2021666": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_147_202116-03-2021179": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_69_202011-02-20201345": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_236_202120-01-20213082": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_239_202121-01-20213064": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_744_202107-04-202161": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_50_202003-02-2020709": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_894_202014-08-2020111": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1621_202018-12-20201175": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1125_202025-09-2020900": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_683_202024-07-2020911": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1171_202126-03-20212055": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_82_202026-06-2020374": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_637_202104-03-2021711": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_69_202112-01-20211729": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_117_202103-02-20211272": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1006_202025-09-20201927": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1364_202004-11-2020403": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_662_202112-03-2021570": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_698_202027-07-2020899": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_659_202021-07-2020946": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_286_202111-02-20211114": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_386_202017-03-202068": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_441_202014-05-2020649": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1698_202007-01-20211793": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_885_202002-09-20202113": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_819_202018-08-202079": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_63_202121-01-20211559": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1112_202015-10-20201730": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_43_202122-01-20211534": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_91_202108-02-20211186": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_281_202125-03-2021289": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_560_202003-06-2020505": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_511_202021-05-2020578": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_152_202128-01-20211427": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_607_202013-07-2020963": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_490_202015-06-20201101": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_161_202010-09-2020394": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_521_202017-06-20201088": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1153_202125-03-20212075": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_738_202126-03-2021270": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_628_202104-03-2021706": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1122_202015-10-20201737": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1288_202015-10-2020654": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_334_202004-03-2020188": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1361_202019-10-2020610": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1478_202019-11-2020291": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1049_202005-10-20201834": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_637_202007-07-2020978": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_927_202116-03-20212285": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_457_202009-06-20201130": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1630_202007-01-20211789": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_538_202027-05-2020553": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_622_202006-07-2020993": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_132_202112-01-20213145": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_507_202104-03-2021696": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_816_202103-04-2021170": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_773_202028-07-2020228": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_130_202005-08-202051": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_522_202102-03-20212504": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_303_202012-05-20201255": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1168_202024-09-2020924": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1248_202001-10-2020830": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_325_202016-05-20201238": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1077_202009-10-20201782": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_502_202118-02-20211001": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_815_202018-08-2020769": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1525_202003-12-2020176": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_130_202112-01-20213143": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_510_202123-02-2021882": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1682_202021-12-202034": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_192_202028-02-2020254": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_479_202124-03-2021318": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1565_202025-11-2020244": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_316_202102-02-20211303": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_831_202108-03-20212396": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_134_202010-08-202033": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_870_202028-08-20202128": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_176_202130-01-20211361": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1523_202003-12-2020175": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1154_202021-10-2020547": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_196_202003-03-20201113": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_672_202022-07-2020942": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_936_202020-08-202050": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_197_202003-03-20201114": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_392_202030-05-20201182": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_670_202124-02-20212587": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_142_202105-02-20211223": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_534_202102-03-2021744": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_133_202010-08-202032": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_962_202018-09-20201982": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_123_202020-02-20201214": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_589_202126-02-2021790": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_61_202127-01-20211453": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1609_202016-10-2020760": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2161_202006-01-20211634": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_223_202029-02-2020286": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_294_202005-03-2020204": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_250_202109-02-2021963": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_265_202103-02-20211115": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_290_202003-03-2020263": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_493_202104-03-2021592": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1938_202021-11-2020355": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_727_202104-03-2021606": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1727_202006-11-2020495": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_354_202103-02-20211123": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1380_202016-12-2020111": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_632_202126-02-2021697": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_438_202017-03-202078": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_588_202122-02-2021739": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_524_202126-02-2021690": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_236_202003-02-2020842": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_956_202016-07-2020443": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_730_202007-07-2020687": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1810_202020-11-2020369": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2033_202015-12-2020140": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_479_202028-07-2020251": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_266_202011-02-2020570": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_631_202016-07-2020437": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_499_202110-02-2021949": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_559_202004-07-2020739": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_19_202107-01-20211603": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_191_202028-01-2020944": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_825_202123-03-2021345": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_113_202024-02-2020400": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_177_202011-02-2020586": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_90_202005-02-2020812": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2264_202007-01-20211615": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_189_202128-01-20211211": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2215_202005-01-20211653": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_366_202013-03-2020103": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_909_202020-07-2020390": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3015_201910-01-20201169": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_641_202126-02-2021698": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2233_202020-01-20211373": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1543_202015-10-2020772": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_576_202117-02-2021832": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_943_202115-03-2021483": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_596_202123-02-2021725": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1846_202011-11-2020460": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2824_201908-01-20201204": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1360_202021-09-20201081": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1878_201919-08-2019186": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_534_202126-02-2021691": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1822_201902-08-2019413": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3175_201903-01-20201291": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2115_202021-12-202057": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1918_201908-08-2019313": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3161_201903-01-20201290": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1916_202024-11-2020324": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_539_202012-03-2020133": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1572_202014-10-2020797": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_43_202010-01-20201164": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1917_202019-11-2020400": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1236_202007-09-20201248": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1132_202102-04-2021211": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2055_202018-12-202081": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2_202003-02-2020850": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1223_202026-08-202013": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1013_202123-03-2021357": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2234_202007-01-20211612": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1004_202118-03-2021421": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_628_202020-03-202024": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1925_201908-08-2019314": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1746_202022-10-2020667": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_317_202119-02-2021771": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1957_201909-08-2019275": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2192_202006-01-20211635": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_401_202110-02-2021940": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2109_202016-12-2020125": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_734_202015-07-2020466": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_803_202112-03-2021490": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1548_202012-10-2020844": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_556_202108-02-20211029": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3014_201918-12-201990": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_191_202018-02-2020496": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_777_202104-03-2021611": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_763_202007-07-2020689": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_735_202013-08-2020104": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2698_201904-01-20201268": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1971_201921-08-2019128": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_394_202103-02-20211127": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_116_202125-01-20211273": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2120_202023-12-202027": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1879_202006-11-2020497": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2119_202021-12-202058": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3116_201924-12-201919": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3013_201918-12-201989": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_80_202027-02-2020334": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1685_202019-10-2020721": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_51_202028-01-2020936": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_223_202104-03-2021588": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_272_202122-01-20211311": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2206_202008-01-20211589": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3037_201920-12-201953": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_961_202123-03-2021350": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_851_202024-07-2020293": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_170_202004-02-2020819": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_410_202101-02-20211154": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_62_202013-01-20201141": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2116_201928-08-201937": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1275_202028-09-2020993": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1650_202017-10-2020737": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1942_202013-11-2020421": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2234_202007-01-20211613": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_352_202103-02-20211121": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_10_202008-01-20201194": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_550_202010-07-2020559": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2147_202016-12-2020131": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2972_201922-01-20201019": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1006_202117-03-2021445": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_989_202125-03-2021290": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_716_202109-03-2021534": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1299_202113-04-202137": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_259_202028-02-2020310": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_245_202004-03-2020230": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_340_202108-02-2021999": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_823_202015-07-2020471": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1628_202021-10-2020683": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_620_202021-03-20204": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2718_201907-01-20201228": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_130_202120-01-20211367": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_284_202010-07-2020555": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_760_202013-07-2020524": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_348_202105-02-20211063": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_609_202020-03-202021": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1707_202011-11-2020448": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_577_202122-02-2021736": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3117_201907-01-20201233": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_54_202125-01-20211268": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1383_202119-04-202112": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_606_202122-02-2021742": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1605_202009-10-2020865": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1257_202022-09-20201062": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_219_202127-01-20211241": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2974_201920-03-20207": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_798_202009-07-2020599": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2770_201907-01-20201229": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2140_202018-12-202085": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1640_202028-10-2020610": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1455_202013-10-2020818": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_394_202012-03-2020123": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_283_202101-02-20211146": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2157_202005-01-20211649": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1974_202009-12-2020203": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_368_202110-02-2021938": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_86_202014-02-2020528": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_740_202014-07-2020491": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_62_202111-01-20211561": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1772_202004-11-2020529": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_291_202005-03-2020202": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_298_202025-02-2020388": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1502_202006-10-2020928": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1168_202024-08-202031": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1710_202030-10-2020588": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1972_202016-12-2020114": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_946_202102-04-2021200": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_662_202122-02-2021748": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1139_202012-08-2020141": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_809_202104-03-2021614": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_454_202017-03-202080": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_98_202120-01-20211364": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1672_201908-08-2019303": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1558_202008-10-2020886": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_123_202127-01-20211233": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1122_202008-09-20201219": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_819_202020-07-2020376": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1482_202003-10-2020954": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_983_202118-03-2021418": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_75_202015-07-2020457": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_38_202010-01-20201163": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2914_201922-01-20201018": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_164_202120-01-20211369": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3018_201918-12-201991": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2211_202004-01-20211673": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_483_202007-07-2020678": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_299_202112-02-2021878": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1678_202017-10-2020740": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1983_202016-12-2020115": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_684_202109-03-2021531": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_303_202104-02-20211082": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1085_202013-08-2020112": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_367_202104-02-20211088": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1440_202007-10-2020902": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2620_201907-01-20201225": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_72_202119-01-20211396": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2986_201924-12-20199": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_67_202014-02-2020526": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1872_201907-08-2019335": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1922_201914-08-2019249": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1705_202020-10-2020713": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_675_202110-03-2021504": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_398_202006-03-2020170": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_55_202125-01-20211269": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_509_202104-02-20211095": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_148_202005-02-2020814": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_582_202109-02-2021981": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1351_202007-10-2020899": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_399_202018-03-202048": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2271_202019-01-20211408": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_785_202020-07-2020375": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2089_202016-12-2020123": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_243_202027-02-2020340": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1155_202026-08-20205": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_597_202122-02-2021741": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_10_202108-01-20211581": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_606_202006-07-2020709": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1295_202008-09-20201230": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1273_202007-09-20201254": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_984_202123-03-2021354": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1893_201916-08-2019224": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2792_201921-01-20201040": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1204_202106-04-2021141": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2022_201919-08-2019198": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_356_202020-03-202011": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1849_202020-11-2020373": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2249_202011-01-20211571": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_299_202025-02-2020389": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_475_202007-03-2020144": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1329_202019-09-20201099": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_193_202020-02-2020443": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1985_202018-12-202079": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_196_202115-01-20211483": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1808_202011-11-2020455": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1911_201908-08-2019312": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1349_202119-04-20218": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_754_202005-08-2020171": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1882_202019-11-2020395": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2955_201910-12-2019340": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1359_202025-09-20201006": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_501_202110-02-2021950": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_41_202113-01-20211503": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1137_202014-08-202095": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_846_202010-07-2020570": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2031_201919-08-2019200": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1500_202008-10-2020881": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_912_202021-07-2020353": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_85_202014-01-20201128": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1060_202102-04-2021208": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_441_202104-02-20211092": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_641_202023-07-2020306": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1180_202026-08-20209": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_337_202017-03-202075": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_682_202126-02-2021703": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1214_202031-08-20201311": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_571_202017-03-202085": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1166_202101-04-2021238": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_764_202021-07-2020348": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1647_202020-10-2020708": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1876_202020-11-2020376": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_712_202126-02-2021704": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3079_201919-12-201967": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_252_202025-02-2020386": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1131_202106-04-2021139": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1232_202012-10-2020833": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1208_202008-09-20201223": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_879_202112-03-2021495": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1434_202016-10-2020751": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_97_202022-01-20201013": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_966_202029-07-2020227": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_311_202104-02-20211083": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_117_202010-02-2020601": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_244_202101-02-20211145": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_222_202129-01-20211186": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1980_201922-08-2019112": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1238_202102-04-2021217": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1655_202002-11-2020542": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_61_202106-01-20211627": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_845_202010-07-2020569": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1982_201909-08-2019282": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2145_201926-08-201986": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1144_202002-09-20201278": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_53_202003-02-2020861": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1065_202029-07-2020241": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_34_202111-01-20211559": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_600_202019-03-202038": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_19_202030-01-2020902": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1190_202027-08-20201339": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1812_202009-11-2020483": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_983_202027-07-2020275": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1907_202021-12-202054": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101_202006-03-2020157": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_93_202004-07-2020736": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_573_202115-02-2021867": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_221_202025-02-2020383": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_205_202125-01-20211279": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1323_202113-04-202139": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2059_201917-08-2019217": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_574_202111-02-2021916": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_257_202020-02-2020452": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_891_202116-03-2021460": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1871_202019-11-2020393": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_643_202013-10-2020817": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1946_201919-08-2019191": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_922_202014-07-2020502": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1337_202007-09-20201263": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1381_202017-09-20201111": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_327_202103-02-20211117": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_187_202128-01-20211210": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1624_202017-10-2020732": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_194_202027-01-2020961": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_619_202021-03-20203": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_295_202122-01-20211312": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2222_202013-01-20211510": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1037_202023-07-2020313": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_644_202119-02-2021788": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_181_202019-02-2020481": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_73_202028-02-2020304": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_384_202129-01-20211192": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1754_202012-11-2020431": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_178_202122-01-20211303": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1123_202012-08-2020139": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_595_202019-03-202037": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_551_202119-02-2021783": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3138_201910-01-20201170": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_828_202030-07-2020188": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1787_202005-11-2020512": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_147_202005-02-2020813": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_750_202008-07-2020657": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_53_202108-01-20211583": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_683_202030-06-2020923": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1730_202023-10-2020642": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_44_202006-02-2020781": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_258_202030-01-2020896": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1938_201919-08-2019189": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3191_201910-01-20201173": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_235_202006-03-2020158": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2208_202022-01-20211315": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1555_202023-10-2020636": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_930_202022-07-2020333": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2028_202009-12-2020207": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3049_201918-12-201992": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_234_202028-01-2020948": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_310_202101-02-20211148": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1869_202011-12-2020167": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1025_202102-04-2021205": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_216_202101-02-20211142": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_328_202103-02-20211118": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_813_202017-07-2020408": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_135_202010-02-2020605": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3118_201920-12-201957": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_11_202111-01-20211555": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_569_202018-03-202063": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_408_202023-07-2020304": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_109_202007-02-2020766": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1771_202002-11-2020548": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_982_202125-02-2021967": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3173_201918-07-2019645": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2566_202023-11-2020452": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101_202008-01-20201111": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2662_201917-07-2019660": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4013_201916-08-2019249": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_764_202011-02-2020458": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_175_202115-03-2021108": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1388_202108-03-2021759": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4390_201920-08-2019179": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6489_201904-12-2019456": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1459_202010-06-2020835": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2676_202002-12-2020371": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1394_202026-08-202022": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_638_202115-03-2021571": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1904_202113-04-2021126": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3405_201925-07-2019530": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1307_202108-03-2021753": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_190_202118-03-202188": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_294_202025-02-2020236": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3369_201924-07-2019565": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3776_201920-08-2019157": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2449_202024-11-2020420": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4011_201913-08-2019315": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5299_201931-10-2019929": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7365_201930-06-2020691": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7_202009-06-2020879": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5855_201911-11-2019778": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2330_202018-11-2020469": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_277_202028-10-202053": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3343_201926-07-2019485": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1971_202114-04-202189": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_737_202015-07-2020548": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7351_201922-01-2020823": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1468_202118-03-2021467": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_761_202111-02-20211169": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7452_201908-01-20201131": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3117_201923-07-2019580": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6597_201921-12-201955": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6333_201909-12-2019366": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6700_201905-12-2019422": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6632_201902-12-2019492": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5909_201921-10-20191113": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_712_202014-07-2020581": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2730_202014-12-2020197": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7457_201907-01-20201155": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4196_201928-08-201923": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7491_201902-01-20201273": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2791_202003-12-2020332": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_798_202027-07-2020327": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_136_202125-02-2021147": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2413_202017-11-2020497": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2148_202023-11-2020442": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4689_201904-09-20191897": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_197_202124-03-2021317": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2176_202014-12-2020189": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4389_201920-08-2019178": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_547_202017-07-2020487": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1172_202024-08-202059": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_785_202117-02-20211107": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_163_202124-02-2021982": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7517_201917-01-2020928": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7211_201921-01-2020847": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1609_202116-03-2021561": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_463_202018-02-2020308": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2965_202024-12-202020": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_31_202110-02-20211181": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5589_201926-11-2019701": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3494_201926-07-2019492": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_583_202007-07-2020625": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1171_202110-03-2021641": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1315_202110-03-2021646": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_182_202116-03-2021103": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6424_201905-12-2019419": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6277_201928-11-2019643": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_304_202014-01-2020974": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_479_202112-03-2021599": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2391_202024-12-202011": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5118_201918-10-20191131": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7140_201921-12-201967": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2332_202023-11-2020444": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_57_202108-02-2021190": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6009_201904-12-2019442": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1207_202119-03-2021422": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_232_202021-09-2020119": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1447_202026-08-202024": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4765_201925-09-20191541": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3760_201919-08-2019193": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2003_202017-11-2020489": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3749_201919-08-2019192": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1128_202109-03-2021686": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3090_202024-12-202028": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6417_201929-11-2019606": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_878_202126-02-2021929": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_213_202124-03-202164": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_204_202122-03-202176": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1376_202109-03-2021712": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_139_202126-02-2021143": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1778_202126-03-2021283": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1810_202125-03-2021310": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4423_201928-08-201931": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5815_201931-10-2019935": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2189_202009-11-2020546": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1072_202126-02-2021940": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_704_202117-02-20211104": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_186_202117-03-202196": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4188_201921-08-2019141": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_740_202110-02-20211190": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1504_202011-06-2020817": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1965_202114-04-202187": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1184_202103-03-2021837": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1430_202109-03-2021719": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_743_202012-02-2020411": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1083_202112-03-2021601": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6299_201904-12-2019444": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4160_201926-08-201951": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_944_202027-07-2020337": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_94_202115-02-2021183": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1007_202110-03-2021631": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_417_202023-01-2020781": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_763_202123-02-20211022": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_225_202014-01-2020969": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3838_201913-08-2019303": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_532_202111-02-20211167": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_130_202124-02-2021150": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7297_201904-01-20201208": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_238_202028-09-2020113": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2607_202014-12-2020194": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2405_202006-11-2020582": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_264_202029-06-2020710": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_459_202004-07-2020629": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5646_201924-10-20191016": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3044_202014-12-2020212": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_92_202115-02-2021181": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3067_201923-07-2019579": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_773_202115-03-2021575": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_877_202109-02-20211211": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1496_202118-03-2021468": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_277_202130-04-20212": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1199_202119-02-20211079": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6075_201922-11-2019738": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1195_202004-03-2020128": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3974_201913-08-2019313": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2366_202126-04-20216": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_728_202125-03-2021296": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_746_202006-08-2020204": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_718_202012-02-2020409": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1644_202003-06-2020976": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6373_201913-12-2019218": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_295_202022-06-2020757": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_916_202018-02-2020322": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3833_201913-08-2019302": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5235_201923-09-20191610": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5774_201930-10-2019948": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2462_202010-12-2020251": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_299_202102-03-2021858": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5069_201904-10-20191381": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4051_201926-08-201950": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5878_201926-11-2019704": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_252_202001-07-2020677": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_61_202108-02-2021192": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1716_202119-03-2021451": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3726_201914-08-2019271": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_613_202004-02-2020576": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3393_201920-08-2019154": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_687_202016-07-2020520": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_107_202118-02-2021168": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4783_201927-09-20191513": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7427_201908-01-20201123": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6689_201910-12-2019327": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5458_201916-10-20191249": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4397_201926-08-201970": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7208_201902-01-20201263": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_579_202104-02-20211284": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3076_202014-12-2020213": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_733_202122-02-20211052": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2057_202114-04-202190": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7054_201910-12-2019341": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4403_201910-10-20191318": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_623_202007-02-2020497": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6437_201904-12-2019449": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1303_202109-03-2021698": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7403_201903-01-20201233": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6573_201922-11-2019751": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_545_202116-02-20211127": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_585_202024-01-2020752": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3470_201922-07-2019605": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2925_202010-12-2020259": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1210_202125-03-2021299": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_146_202005-02-2020536": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5728_201918-10-20191163": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1756_202130-03-2021268": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_661_202018-02-2020309": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2654_202002-12-2020367": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5475_201905-11-2019864": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4342_201903-09-20191913": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7215_201923-12-201945": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3495_201901-08-2019427": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_254_202008-10-202086": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5269_201918-10-20191136": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3201_201922-07-2019599": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1646_202002-12-2020341": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1943_202107-04-2021225": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4884_201911-09-20191783": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5055_201916-10-20191232": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1501_202010-06-2020842": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_484_202021-07-2020428": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3083_202016-12-2020128": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_382_202016-07-2020513": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_770_202124-02-2021989": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1291_202110-03-2021645": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1661_202122-03-2021396": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5893_201905-11-2019878": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_97_202115-02-2021186": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_172_202110-03-2021114": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_274_202007-07-2020614": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1435_202109-03-2021720": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7298_201909-01-20201081": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_202_202122-03-202174": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3203_201919-07-2019620": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_631_202007-08-2020191": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7145_201903-01-20201224": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_272_202127-04-20218": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4274_201928-08-201926": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3057_202024-12-202026": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1686_202009-06-2020870": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_256_202008-10-202088": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3564_201922-07-2019606": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_449_202024-01-2020750": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2415_202002-12-2020349": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6298_201928-11-2019645": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_870_202004-03-2020117": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3621_201919-07-2019638": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_760_202124-02-2021987": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6171_201902-01-20201247": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6293_201921-11-2019753": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1278_202009-06-2020855": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3123_202017-12-2020102": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1463_202118-03-2021466": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4886_201927-09-20191515": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_846_202023-07-2020390": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3449_201915-07-2019716": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2488_202006-11-2020586": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2243_202003-12-2020316": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_160_202023-01-2020763": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3403_201926-07-2019486": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1224_202020-08-202091": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5421_201916-10-20191238": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1460_202118-03-2021465": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5121_201903-10-20191419": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6628_201911-12-2019283": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1134_202012-08-2020166": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_170_202110-03-2021112": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_735_202022-07-2020407": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5831_201901-11-2019911": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_13_202118-01-2021228": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_121_202109-02-20211194": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5637_201916-10-20191256": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3461_201922-07-2019604": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5123_201903-10-20191420": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3539_201913-08-2019293": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3206_201915-07-2019703": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1634_202118-03-2021477": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7203_201902-01-20201261": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_767_202124-02-2021988": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1698_202113-04-2021110": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2766_202021-12-202062": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_703_202126-02-2021924": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6840_201911-12-2019291": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3646_201926-08-201944": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4612_201928-08-201936": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_795_202005-02-2020558": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_608_202108-03-2021725": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4000_201909-08-2019340": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1290_202005-03-2020107": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2864_202014-12-2020201": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3134_202024-12-202029": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3307_202024-12-202042": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_714_202020-07-2020459": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6263_201909-12-2019361": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_244_202029-09-2020110": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_771_202030-06-2020689": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4729_201930-09-20191467": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1650_202005-06-2020944": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1459_202118-03-2021464": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_8_202113-01-2021236": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7098_201918-12-2019139": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5613_201915-10-20191298": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1368_202119-03-2021425": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3165_201918-07-2019644": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6181_201909-12-2019354": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4293_201928-08-201927": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4138_201921-08-2019136": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1865_202113-04-2021121": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1369_202115-03-2021590": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1009_202122-03-2021383": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5418_201927-11-2019662": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7434_201908-01-20201128": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_926_202018-02-2020324": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1397_202119-03-2021428": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7004_201904-12-2019465": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_687_202111-02-20211168": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_726_202015-07-2020546": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_179_202104-02-20211259": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6729_201918-12-2019127": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3615_201921-08-2019129": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1202_202109-03-2021689": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2504_202003-12-2020319": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3500_201916-08-2019239": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6223_201910-12-2019311": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3733_201921-08-2019130": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_851_202103-03-2021825": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3119_201917-07-2019665": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1257_202114-04-202184": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_357_202012-02-2020401": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4646_201918-09-20191667": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1035_202027-07-2020344": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1664_202119-03-2021445": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7506_201902-01-20201274": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_983_202122-02-20211059": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6203_201905-12-2019408": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3147_201931-07-2019450": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1647_202003-06-2020978": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6581_201928-11-2019652": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2840_202011-12-2020235": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_719_202012-02-2020410": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6613_201910-12-2019324": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6199_201905-11-2019883": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_248_202107-04-202116": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1585_202003-06-2020971": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5032_201904-10-20191378": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_326_202022-01-2020815": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4106_201919-08-2019203": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_390_202023-01-2020779": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_165_202109-03-2021119": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2780_202011-12-2020230": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5812_201907-11-2019816": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2740_202009-12-2020276": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1623_202004-06-2020958": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2655_202002-12-2020368": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7461_201913-01-20201005": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3800_201901-08-2019441": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3682_201909-08-2019328": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1665_202122-03-2021399": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_446_202024-01-2020749": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6326_201927-11-2019680": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2473_202023-11-2020446": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5215_201926-09-20191538": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1583_202002-06-2020990": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1701_202115-04-202165": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3273_201918-07-2019648": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_480_202020-07-2020452": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_228_202022-01-2020808": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_178_202013-01-2020995": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2690_202024-11-2020433": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_302_202017-12-20203": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1230_202027-05-20201014": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4861_201913-09-20191743": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3378_201924-07-2019566": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4988_201919-09-20191660": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1217_202126-02-2021944": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_690_202023-07-2020383": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7314_201902-01-20201266": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5006_201925-09-20191547": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2758_202024-11-2020439": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_675_202023-07-2020381": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1620_202119-03-2021442": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102_202123-02-2021154": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_587_202009-06-2020853": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7263_201921-01-2020848": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_340_202024-01-2020745": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_997_202125-02-2021970": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2821_202021-12-202063": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1407_202108-03-2021761": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2219_202012-11-2020525": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_22_202122-01-2021216": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_120_202122-02-2021160": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2443_202002-12-2020352": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_125_202122-02-2021163": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4025_201919-08-2019202": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5523_201915-10-20191295": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_839_202012-02-2020416": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2403_202006-11-2020581": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_129_202030-06-2020687": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3391_201920-08-2019152": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3875_201901-08-2019446": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5597_201921-10-20191098": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_940_202024-08-202050": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_294_202005-11-202024": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_533_202029-01-2020661": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_216_202125-03-202153": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7213_201924-01-2020754": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2739_202025-11-2020403": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1517_202015-06-2020786": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2754_202007-12-2020287": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3183_202024-12-202033": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5873_201922-10-20191073": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6584_201923-11-2019726": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6911_201908-01-20201118": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1513_202118-03-2021470": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6000_201901-11-2019921": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1173_202003-03-2020151": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5171_201904-10-20191388": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3756_201931-07-2019465": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1409_202004-06-2020951": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_950_202021-08-202073": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4429_201926-08-201973": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_541_202019-08-2020101": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3448_201926-07-2019487": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_119_202120-02-2021167": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_364_202030-06-2020702": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5251_201904-10-20191399": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1165_202123-02-20211043": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3540_201909-08-2019325": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1068_202108-03-2021738": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_207_202123-03-202168": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6271_201906-11-2019851": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6800_201905-12-2019424": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1243_202122-03-2021386": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3545_201919-08-2019191": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7462_201917-01-2020926": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3511_201923-07-2019589": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4066_201917-08-2019234": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_178_202116-03-202199": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_222_202126-03-202143": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5629_201916-10-20191254": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1452_202009-06-2020860": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_842_202023-07-2020389": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1054_202117-03-2021495": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7389_201902-01-20201268": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_147_202102-03-2021131": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5939_201905-11-2019880": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5153_201904-10-20191386": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_660_202110-02-20211189": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5533_201917-10-20191204": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2312_202018-11-2020467": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1669_202006-11-2020365": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_542_202105-03-2021424": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_593_202109-03-2021345": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_754_201920-06-2019449": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1733_202017-10-2020524": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1835_202003-11-2020410": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2293_202011-01-20211158": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1803_202008-12-2020136": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1597_202021-10-2020492": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1989_202020-11-2020260": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_985_202019-08-202079": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1667_202023-10-2020470": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_174_202105-02-2021815": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2303_202004-01-20211251": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1320_201916-10-2019709": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1747_202028-10-2020454": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_76_202007-02-2020291": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2100_202004-12-2020173": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1641_201920-12-201942": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1777_202027-10-2020461": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2202_202014-12-202099": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1880_202023-11-2020248": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_598_202109-03-2021346": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1119_201917-09-2019857": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1257_201911-10-2019739": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_104_202013-02-2020209": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1539_202028-09-2020676": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_767_202103-04-202135": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100_202005-02-2020323": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1885_202010-11-2020325": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2015_202021-11-2020258": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1481_202019-09-2020747": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2048_202025-11-2020230": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_80_202111-01-20211154": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_572_202122-03-2021179": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1001355_201905-11-2019539": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1364_202005-09-2020828": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1094_202024-08-202041": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1748_202007-11-2020346": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1001294_201916-11-2019381": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1510_201929-11-2019274": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_538_202103-03-2021473": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_815_201904-07-2019375": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1173_201920-09-2019830": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2167_202011-12-2020110": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_483_202012-03-202043": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_386_202028-08-2020865": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1672_201924-12-20195": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_98_202020-01-2020494": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1510_202021-09-2020731": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1291_201909-10-2019751": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1732_202003-11-2020406": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2232_202024-12-20203": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1537_202029-09-2020671": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_115_202018-01-2020502": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1716_202020-10-2020505": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2313_202011-01-20211161": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1852_202007-11-2020354": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2300_202011-01-20211159": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1557_201905-12-2019221": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4000108_201920-06-2019455": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_109_202118-01-20211054": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1735_201907-01-2020602": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_254_202105-02-2021818": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1697_201923-12-201915": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1472_202016-09-2020760": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_352_202116-02-2021643": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1302_201905-10-2019755": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1274_202025-08-202034": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1399_202009-09-2020789": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1541_202005-10-2020621": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1128_201931-08-2019980": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_157_202028-01-2020396": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_998_201908-08-2019130": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_205_202104-02-2021837": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1545_202024-09-2020695": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_119_202129-01-2021922": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2179_202005-01-20211231": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_557_202105-03-2021426": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2198_202015-12-202090": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_862_201906-07-2019356": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1266_201915-10-2019718": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_867_201908-07-2019345": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2117_202023-12-20209": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_672_201925-05-2019564": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1174_202026-08-20208": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_769_201918-06-2019461": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2083_202016-12-202060": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1555_202025-09-2020684": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2267_202012-01-20211143": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_580_202106-03-2021402": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_203_202121-01-20211007": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1705_202016-10-2020530": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_854_201926-07-2019217": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1184_201920-09-2019833": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2312_202012-01-20211144": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1201_201914-10-2019724": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2174_202016-12-202067": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_680_201920-05-2019603": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1660_201903-01-2020650": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2027_202027-11-2020212": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1640_201920-12-201941": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_110_202013-02-2020210": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_57_202116-01-20211069": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_51_202112-01-20211133": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_455_202102-03-2021496": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_267_202104-02-2021840": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_583_202108-03-2021381": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1437_202014-09-2020777": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_759_201915-06-2019471": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_484_202124-02-2021560": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1551_202030-09-2020660": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_296_202109-02-2021760": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_603_202124-03-2021124": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_665_201910-05-2019675": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_585_202016-09-2020755": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_208_202127-01-2021953": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_498_202106-03-2021396": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_922_202019-08-202078": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2270_202005-01-20211236": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1601085_201909-09-2019912": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1833_202007-11-2020352": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_23_202008-01-2020576": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_583_202117-03-2021278": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1_202108-01-20211168": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2187_202016-12-202069": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_507_202125-02-2021537": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2259_202006-01-20211210": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_753_202124-03-2021138": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1021_201927-08-201923": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_846_201908-07-2019344": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1267_201921-10-2019638": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1954_202005-12-2020157": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1505_201902-12-2019250": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_259_202103-02-2021868": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_242_202101-02-2021892": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1303_202002-09-2020850": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_634_202123-03-2021153": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1213_201926-09-2019783": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_88_202024-01-2020430": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1151_202025-08-202030": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1685_202017-10-2020519": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1066_201927-08-201924": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_108_202111-01-20211155": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1782_202002-11-2020419": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1961_202026-11-2020217": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_755_201920-06-2019450": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1618_202017-10-2020518": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2287_202008-01-20211178": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2265_202006-01-20211212": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1443_201909-12-2019186": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1781_202009-12-2020121": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_543_202109-03-2021339": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_624_202118-03-2021249": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_652_202115-03-2021304": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_679_202119-03-2021229": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1216_201924-09-2019796": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_504_202105-03-2021420": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_749_201911-06-2019477": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1475_201918-11-2019364": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2169_202016-12-202066": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_857_201906-07-2019354": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_996_201928-08-201915": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2308_202015-01-20211099": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2038_202011-12-2020103": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_575_202109-03-2021344": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_738_202124-03-2021133": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_532_202103-03-2021471": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_238_202012-02-2020222": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1971_202009-11-2020339": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_304_202106-02-2021797": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_781_201925-06-2019422": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_626_202118-03-2021251": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1706_202018-11-2020274": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1972_202009-11-2020340": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_72_202108-01-20211172": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_585_202122-03-2021182": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1824_202027-10-2020462": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_258_202104-02-2021839": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1753_202022-10-2020488": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2149_202010-12-2020115": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1994_202027-11-2020211": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1447_202019-09-2020740": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_694_202101-04-202169": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1146_201912-09-2019896": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1630_201912-12-2019131": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1720_201901-01-2020689": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_77_202107-01-20211186": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_217_202012-02-2020220": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1329_202009-09-2020783": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1269_202026-08-202022": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_310_202111-02-2021704": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1854_202002-11-2020427": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1878_202003-11-2020413": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1928_202018-11-2020280": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1517_202029-09-2020669": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1591_202007-10-2020597": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1236_202026-08-202015": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_554_202108-03-2021379": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2299_202015-01-20211098": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_632_202118-03-2021252": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1093_201929-08-20195": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_800_201927-06-2019407": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2143_202004-01-20211247": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1932_202019-11-2020265": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1482_202021-09-2020729": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2195_202011-12-2020111": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1290_202027-08-2020891": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2022_202004-12-2020164": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_816_202103-04-202138": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1980_202012-11-2020298": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1579_202005-10-2020625": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_676_201925-05-2019565": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_612_202117-03-2021282": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1662_201916-12-201989": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1325_201925-10-2019578": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_619_202110-03-2021321": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1504_201922-11-2019325": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_75_202122-01-2021974": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_361_202112-02-2021681": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2053_202021-11-2020259": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_108_202022-01-2020459": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1703_202017-10-2020521": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2246_202002-01-20211264": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_617_202118-03-2021248": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1212_202024-08-202048": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1001405_201918-11-2019365": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_36_202004-01-2020633": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_866_201915-07-2019302": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_377_202126-02-2021524": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_392_202117-02-2021620": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1001361_201911-11-2019450": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1010_201926-08-201929": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_355_202018-02-2020170": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_746_201915-06-2019470": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1001410_201914-11-2019407": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_486_202018-03-202032": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1729_201907-01-2020601": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1645_202003-10-2020640": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_651_202124-03-2021367": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_346_202012-03-202064": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_639_202005-08-2020395": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_140_202121-01-20211273": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_365_202026-05-2020599": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_462_202012-05-2020872": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_620_202027-07-2020792": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_742_202025-08-202037": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2028_202022-12-202052": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2193_202006-01-20211536": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1037_202031-08-20201331": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1477_202020-10-20201600": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_685_202125-03-2021331": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_455_202017-06-2020509": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_710_202006-08-2020377": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_210_202027-02-2020202": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1542_202028-10-20201577": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_430_202122-02-2021850": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_724_202122-03-2021402": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_541_202109-03-2021586": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_437_202115-02-20211933": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_262_202101-02-20212014": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1485_202010-11-2020601": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_287_202102-02-20212008": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_929_202019-08-2020171": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_886_202018-08-2020740": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_202_202121-01-20212049": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_339_202105-02-20211975": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_293_202104-02-20211083": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_298_202104-02-20211980": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1861_202010-12-2020209": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1063_202014-09-20201734": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_535_202001-06-2020582": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_513_202026-05-2020612": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1725_202009-11-2020628": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_421_202112-02-20211935": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1397_202001-10-20201139": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_263_202101-02-20212015": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_390_202110-02-20211947": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_873_202109-04-2021125": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1318_202006-10-20201654": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_63_202108-01-20212091": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_520_202026-05-2020823": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1074_202122-04-202122": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_538_202019-05-2020654": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1104_202024-09-20201183": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1589_202002-11-20201564": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_251_202102-02-20211130": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1638_202010-11-20201529": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_704_202118-03-2021473": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_621_202013-08-2020287": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_700_202115-03-2021552": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_465_202013-05-2020862": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_704_202028-07-2020790": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1816_202024-11-20201489": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1002_202031-08-20201781": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1465_202020-10-2020808": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_212_202122-01-20211246": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_247_202103-02-20211097": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1914_202007-12-20201463": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_964_202026-08-2020699": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1843_202025-11-20201483": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_707_202013-08-2020294": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_155_202120-01-20211300": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_649_202018-06-2020507": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_259_202130-01-20212035": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_400_202125-02-2021746": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1854_202026-11-20201480": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_489_202019-05-2020829": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_556_202004-06-2020809": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1106_202014-09-20201250": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_39_202110-02-2021969": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_66_202102-02-20211120": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_999_202031-08-20201780": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1630_202003-11-2020661": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1005_202031-08-20201783": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1387_202019-10-2020837": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_953_202025-08-2020706": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1214_202024-09-20201716": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_389_202110-02-20211946": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_646_202116-03-2021525": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2016_202016-12-2020122": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1555_202002-11-2020675": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_12_202111-01-20211467": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_25_202112-01-20211440": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1833_202023-11-2020410": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_189_202025-02-2020249": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1800_202019-11-2020467": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_494_202122-02-20211920": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2094_202022-12-202054": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_830_202101-04-2021239": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_220_202103-02-20211096": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_495_202122-02-20211921": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1476_202020-10-20201599": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1161_202016-09-20201222": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_287_202111-02-2021953": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_802_202019-08-2020735": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_48_202113-01-20211426": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1777_202012-11-2020557": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1659_202009-11-20201543": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_109_202011-02-2020391": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_451_202013-05-2020859": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1419_202014-10-20201634": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_335_202105-02-20211971": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_973_202021-08-2020104": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1253_202007-10-20201011": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1989_202015-12-2020151": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_149_202101-02-20211141": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_784_202018-08-2020192": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1180_202024-09-20201707": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_453_202117-02-20211929": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1729_202017-11-2020517": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1878_202002-12-20201473": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_521_202026-05-2020824": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1206_202014-09-20201260": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2175_202014-01-20211411": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_427_202018-05-2020658": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_541_202125-02-20211892": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_275_202110-02-2021973": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_962_202122-04-20217": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_776_202125-03-2021343": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1018_202002-09-20201764": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2208_202006-01-20211538": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_56_202108-01-20212089": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_715_202103-04-2021217": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_302_202103-02-20211993": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1410_202006-10-20201043": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_545_202003-06-2020812": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1106_202014-09-20201750": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1353_202001-10-20201133": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_283_202103-02-20211107": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_425_202123-02-2021806": "DENIED", + "Bail Cancellation_2_201919-11-2020452": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_187_202119-01-20212058": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_540_202003-06-2020811": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_111_202121-01-20211271": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2257_202008-01-20211493": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_282_202102-02-20212003": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_123_202120-01-20211294": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1842_202023-11-2020414": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_511_202123-02-20211905": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_144_202011-02-2020397": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_181_202119-01-20212055": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_43_202107-01-20212097": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_987_202120-04-202135": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_387_202117-02-2021909": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_367_202109-02-20211949": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_604_202019-06-2020491": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_526_202124-02-20211902": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_595_202027-07-2020480": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1217_202001-10-20201111": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_234_202003-03-2020138": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1093_202003-09-20201283": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_813_202131-03-2021280": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_406_202122-02-2021846": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1419_202016-10-2020876": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1416_202016-10-2020874": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_737_202110-03-20211856": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1459_202022-10-2020752": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_688_202119-03-2021446": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_643_202119-03-2021443": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_732_202105-04-2021196": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1487_202019-10-2020847": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1350_202007-10-20201023": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1360_202013-10-2020926": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_295_202102-02-20212010": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1849_202024-11-2020389": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1801_202019-11-2020468": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1074_202014-09-20201735": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_423_202008-05-2020875": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_334_202124-02-2021777": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_422_202111-02-20211942": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_397_202118-02-2021898": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1582_202011-11-2020569": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_803_202014-08-2020262": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_318_202105-02-20211965": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_422_202008-05-2020874": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1030_202027-08-20201368": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_942_202025-08-2020703": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_9_202004-02-2020493": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1321_202006-10-20201655": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_648_202124-03-2021366": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1111_202015-09-20201232": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_484_202122-02-20211918": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_336_202105-02-20211972": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_515_202026-05-2020819": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_738_202110-03-20211857": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2040_202010-12-2020213": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_235_202003-03-2020139": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_146_202011-02-2020399": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1557_202023-10-2020735": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_68_202011-02-2020382": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1338_202005-10-20201077": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_413_202013-05-2020677": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_27_202112-01-20211442": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_997_202024-08-202075": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_701_202119-03-2021449": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_674_202120-03-2021421": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_203_202104-02-20211074": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2171_202001-01-20211597": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1075_202001-10-20201099": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_507_202026-05-2020818": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1486_202019-10-2020846": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2027_202022-12-202051": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1354_202001-10-20201134": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_741_202125-03-2021336": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_434_202008-05-2020880": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_973_202027-08-20201791": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_393_202019-05-2020646": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_214_202104-02-20211077": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_912_202020-08-2020730": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_754_202108-04-2021146": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1751_202024-11-2020386": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1357_202024-09-20201198": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1804_202017-11-2020524": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_679_202006-08-2020374": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_497_202122-02-20211922": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_992_202002-09-20201760": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_549_202115-03-2021541": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_209_202027-02-2020201": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1564_202028-10-20201580": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_214_202026-02-2020224": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_870_202017-08-2020746": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1580_202027-10-2020720": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_744_202031-07-2020787": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_836_202018-08-2020194": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_303_202108-02-20211024": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_222_202122-01-20211249": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2093_202022-12-202053": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1271_202001-10-20201121": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_406_202111-02-20211939": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_976_202119-04-202151": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_324_202104-02-20211988": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2034_202021-12-20201446": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_201_202121-01-20212048": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1653_202010-11-2020607": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1798_202019-11-2020466": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_69_202011-02-2020383": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_424_202119-02-2021879": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_517_202026-05-2020821": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_820_202019-08-2020163": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_756_202007-08-2020347": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1172_202005-10-20201052": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_803_202013-08-2020753": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_24_202105-01-20212107": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1053_202123-04-20214": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_439_202014-05-2020845": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_183_202031-07-2020428": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1363_202009-10-2020975": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1532_202013-10-2020936": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1502_202022-10-2020756": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_248_202129-01-20212038": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_440_202014-05-2020846": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_545_202125-02-20211896": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1732_202024-11-2020385": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_908_202108-04-2021151": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1112_202014-09-20201754": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_130_202122-03-2021394": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2015_202015-12-2020153": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1928_202002-12-2020311": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1452_202016-10-2020880": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_40_202113-01-20211423": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_368_202026-05-2020600": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_277_202101-02-20212027": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1187_202015-09-20201239": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1087_202014-09-20201739": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1645_202012-11-2020538": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1220_202028-09-20201695": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1303_202001-10-20201129": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1168_202028-09-20201159": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_426_202125-02-2021747": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_116_202119-01-20211320": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1080_202014-09-20201737": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2065_202021-12-202072": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1653_202010-11-20201530": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_394_202018-03-2020956": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1857_202019-11-2020479": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_982_202031-08-20201777": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1768_202012-11-2020556": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1647_202009-11-20201535": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_690_202007-08-2020340": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1658_202009-11-20201542": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_658_202019-08-2020158": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1287_202014-10-2020905": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_578_202016-06-2020802": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2081_202024-12-20206": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1803_202019-11-2020470": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_844_202017-08-2020228": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_857_202026-08-202011": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_390_202117-02-2021910": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2224_202006-01-20211541": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_449_202013-08-2020286": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_569_202105-03-2021644": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_831_202131-03-2021285": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1289_202024-09-20201192": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1012_202021-08-2020109": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_893_202018-08-2020198": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_409_202111-02-2021961": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_828_202013-08-2020761": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_148_202122-01-20211285": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_910_202122-03-20211654": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1444_201905-08-2019183": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1274_202001-10-2020496": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1185_202024-09-2020553": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1266_201908-07-2019498": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1603_202014-12-202096": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_825_202105-04-2021129": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_452_202103-03-2021719": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_632_202108-03-2021589": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2388_201918-12-201944": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1004_202122-04-20212": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1604_201919-08-2019101": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_678_202007-08-2020149": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_698_202125-03-2021217": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_346_202003-03-202090": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_19_202104-02-20212015": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_650_202117-03-2021436": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1097_201904-07-2019545": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_336_202106-02-20211134": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1430_202004-09-20201196": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1594_201920-08-201987": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_876_202102-04-2021155": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_678_202105-03-20211770": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1350_202013-10-2020422": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_526_202106-03-2021616": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1301_202006-10-2020464": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1657_201903-09-20191031": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1001_202017-08-202077": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2749_201909-01-2020497": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_836_202117-03-20211689": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1153_202014-09-2020638": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_579_202106-03-2021621": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1026_202115-04-202142": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2665_201916-12-201981": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1361_202016-10-2020393": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_529_202109-03-2021564": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1618_202028-09-20201079": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1296_202007-10-2020455": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1239_201909-07-2019480": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1055_201912-06-2019696": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2243_201920-11-2019301": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_9_202111-01-20212152": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_962_201927-05-2019848": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1855_201917-09-2019870": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_286_202109-02-20211066": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_916_201923-05-2019888": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_880_202007-08-2020156": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1930_201921-09-2019805": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_160_202121-01-20211298": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2035_201917-10-2019570": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_255_202111-02-20211022": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1151_201913-06-2019693": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_497_202118-02-2021943": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_168_202120-01-20211318": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_375_202119-02-2021913": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_358_202006-03-202031": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1662_201926-08-201939": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1229_201928-06-2019618": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1562_202008-01-20211447": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1051_202020-08-202033": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1665_202022-12-202037": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1525_201903-08-2019198": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_391_202004-03-202072": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_814_202125-03-2021227": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_13_202004-01-2020546": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1962_201925-09-2019754": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_27_202104-01-20211504": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_956_202113-04-202161": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1713_201906-09-2019984": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_321_202110-02-20211045": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1719_202007-01-20211461": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_465_202005-06-2020454": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1498_202018-11-2020195": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_856_202123-03-2021316": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1023_202020-08-202026": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_940_202122-03-20211662": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1384_202023-10-2020337": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1787_202006-01-20211478": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2296_201927-11-2019203": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_165_202103-02-20211188": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2336_201915-11-2019359": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2657_201904-01-2020553": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_315_202014-05-2020527": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_988_201925-05-2019869": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2319_201918-11-2019342": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2605_201923-01-2020367": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_502_202118-02-2021948": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_919_201907-05-20191013": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_933_202028-07-2020255": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_190_202102-02-20211202": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_219_202125-01-20211273": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1168_202018-09-2020586": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_284_202026-02-2020112": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1442_202004-11-2020270": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2295_201906-11-2019433": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_311_202111-02-20211024": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2734_201920-12-201930": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_330_202125-02-2021817": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_979_202116-04-202127": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_267_202102-02-20211206": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_110_202005-02-2020285": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_238_202129-01-20211241": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1808_201912-09-2019933": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_273_202104-02-20211176": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1589_202010-12-2020132": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1541_202021-01-20211307": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1611_202011-12-2020122": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_52_202115-01-20211371": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2016_201928-09-2019704": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1115_202008-09-2020668": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1557_202014-12-202093": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_985_202124-03-20211614": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1118_202101-04-20211589": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_954_202108-04-202191": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_959_202007-08-2020159": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_208_202012-02-2020235": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_409_202109-02-20211082": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_365_202021-01-20211303": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_426_202119-02-2021917": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_914_202006-08-2020180": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1512_202011-11-2020222": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1196_201924-06-2019652": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2224_201925-11-2019226": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_875_201916-05-2019952": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_597_202126-02-20211820": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_25_202006-01-2020531": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1081_202001-09-2020727": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1002_201930-05-2019796": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_392_202004-03-202073": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_70_202005-02-2020284": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_167_202125-01-20211268": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_501_202029-01-20211248": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1770_202002-01-20211529": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_660_202117-03-2021437": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2041_201903-10-2019673": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1456_201919-07-2019294": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1057_202126-03-20211601": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1287_201909-07-2019483": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_137_202118-01-20212102": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1338_201916-07-2019360": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1179_202017-09-2020605": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_810_202116-03-20211710": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2619_201907-01-2020521": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1362_202022-10-2020349": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_383_202111-02-20211028": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1139_202019-09-2020573": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1660_201922-08-201964": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1951_201920-09-2019815": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_939_202122-03-20211661": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_274_202108-02-20211987": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_402_202021-01-20211304": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1697_202001-01-20211537": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1715_201903-09-20191036": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_342_202122-02-2021889": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1885_201913-09-2019924": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_337_202116-02-2021975": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_543_202126-02-2021801": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_482_202025-02-2021824": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1519_202021-11-2020180": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_91_202022-01-2020379": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2441_201929-11-2019193": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_781_202124-03-2021270": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_956_202123-03-20211634": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_310_202112-02-20211006": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_584_202030-05-2020475": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_390_202004-03-202071": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_412_202111-02-20211033": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_27_202018-02-2020175": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_257_202129-01-20212052": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_461_202005-02-20211160": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1209_201903-07-2019571": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2029_201922-01-2020385": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1939_202013-10-20201016": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_156_202104-02-20211172": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_952_201920-05-2019921": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_914_202105-04-2021134": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_302_202115-02-2021992": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1597_202016-12-202074": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_855_202016-07-2020312": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_586_202029-05-2020480": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_954_202006-08-2020187": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1133_202018-09-2020584": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1833_201915-11-2019358": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_984_201925-05-2019867": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1333_202012-10-2020428": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_997_202014-08-202098": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_674_202117-03-2021438": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_813_202116-03-20211713": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1423_201916-07-2019364": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_913_201909-05-2019992": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_672_202017-06-2020421": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1248_201905-07-2019535": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_58_202014-01-2020466": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1556_201926-08-201934": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2114_202021-11-2020805": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1793_201911-09-2019952": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_658_202105-03-2021669": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1478_201903-08-2019193": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_218_202024-01-2020358": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1790_201912-09-2019932": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_465_202115-02-20211918": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1806_201917-09-2019866": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_115_202003-02-2020301": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_787_202117-03-2021444": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1080_202031-08-2020744": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1137_202014-09-2020637": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1566_201920-08-201985": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2641_201922-01-2020388": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_575_202125-02-20211826": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1385_202022-10-2020352": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_851_202118-03-20211678": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_891_202120-03-20211669": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_702_202116-03-2021460": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1181_202029-09-2020511": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1652_201927-08-201923": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_96_202018-01-2020435": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_824_202029-07-2020237": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_843_202122-03-2021345": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_964_201922-05-2019895": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_693_202116-03-2021458": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_662_202110-03-2021538": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1262_201901-07-2019603": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1477_202007-09-20201182": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1408_201907-08-2019148": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1952_201924-09-2019773": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_519_202108-03-2021580": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1606_202014-12-202097": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1450_201920-08-201983": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_781_202028-07-2020249": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_486_202124-02-2021856": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_158_202119-01-20211331": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2045_201930-09-2019693": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1283_202003-10-2020486": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_723_202110-03-2021546": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_895_201903-05-20191031": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1029_202019-08-202043": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_50_202030-01-2020319": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_411_202002-06-2020464": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_506_202125-02-2021827": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1610_202022-12-202035": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_284_202126-02-2021793": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1616_201919-08-2019103": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1968_201923-09-2019786": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_312_202115-02-2021993": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_139_202014-02-2020204": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2261_201931-10-2019484": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1567_201920-08-201986": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1546_202021-12-202045": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1059_201922-06-2019660": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1722_202008-02-20211124": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1286_202014-10-2020405": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1003_202124-03-20211623": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1664_202005-02-20211166": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2107_201904-10-2019663": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2124_201910-10-2019629": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_386_202115-02-2021997": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1560_202009-12-2020144": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1722_201907-09-2019964": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1475_201905-08-2019185": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_828_202120-03-2021373": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1531_202014-09-20201138": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_855_202123-03-2021315": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_625_202108-03-2021586": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_10_202114-01-20212135": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_339_202004-03-202066": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1635_202014-12-2020100": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_963_201925-05-2019863": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_915_201903-05-20191035": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1282_202003-10-2020485": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_709_202108-03-20211748": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_520_202124-02-2021859": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2119_202023-11-2020798": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1104_202004-09-2020697": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1000_201928-05-2019831": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_457_202025-02-2021821": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_715_202118-03-2021418": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1297_201905-08-2019180": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1727_201907-09-2019966": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_840_202131-03-2021178": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_434_202115-02-20211004": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1086_201911-06-2019700": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1748_201906-09-2019988": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1327_202015-10-2020400": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1360_202017-10-2020386": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1435_201931-08-20191049": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_263_202101-03-2021774": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_735_202118-03-2021422": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_153_202005-02-20211147": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2225_201901-11-2019476": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1041_202125-03-20211608": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_211_202020-02-2020147": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_299_202017-03-20207": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_36_202018-01-2020429": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_154_202119-01-20211330": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_692_202115-03-2021489": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1035_202019-08-202048": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1457_201926-07-2019239": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1241_202028-08-20201259": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_304_202104-02-20211178": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_874_202124-03-2021277": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_176_202102-03-2021750": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1431_201903-08-2019190": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1279_201906-08-2019161": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_648_202104-03-2021705": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_517_202119-02-2021925": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_246_202129-01-20211244": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1061_202114-04-202153": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1042_201928-06-2019613": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1617_202028-09-20201078": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1874_201907-09-2019974": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1373_201916-07-2019362": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1106_202031-08-20201246": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_993_202116-04-202129": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1112_202101-04-20211583": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1540_201917-08-2019110": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1765_202021-12-202050": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_602_202104-03-2021699": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_21_202009-01-2020485": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7_202122-01-20211280": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_673_202017-06-2020422": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_157_202118-01-20211350": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_375_202108-02-20211995": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1091_202131-03-20211592": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_767_202007-08-2020151": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1707_201907-09-2019962": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_994_202017-08-202076": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1194_202018-09-2020591": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1108_201920-06-2019674": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1060_201920-06-2019673": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_980_202014-08-202095": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_907_202108-04-202187": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1473_202010-11-2020228": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1557_202016-09-20201129": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_424_202001-02-20211221": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_976_202123-03-20211638": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1881_201916-09-2019887": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_448_202122-02-2021893": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1587_201928-08-201910": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2438_201907-12-2019128": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_439_202029-01-20211246": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2117_202023-11-2020797": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2043_201927-09-2019720": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_577_202106-03-2021620": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_973_202010-08-2020146": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1740_202007-01-20211462": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2715_201909-01-2020493": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_178_202029-01-2020322": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_844_202102-04-2021152": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2064_201915-10-2019593": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_846_202131-03-2021180": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1804_201916-09-2019885": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_667_202112-03-2021507": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_325_202109-02-20211070": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1745_202024-12-20204": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_603_202105-03-2021665": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_71_202125-01-20211264": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_306_202105-02-20211157": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1244_201916-07-2019352": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_830_202115-04-202138": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1234_201905-07-2019533": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_762_202112-04-202169": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_473_202015-05-2020523": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_959_201925-05-2019862": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_734_202122-03-2021336": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1743_201907-09-2019968": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2187_202019-12-2020780": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_129_202024-02-2020134": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1028_201928-05-2019835": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1366_201908-08-2019140": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1431_202003-11-2020289": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1943_202014-10-20201006": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_494_202123-02-2021875": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2143_201924-10-2019506": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_722_202109-03-20211745": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_305_202105-02-20211156": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_842_202122-03-2021344": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_148_202018-02-2020181": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_324_202104-02-20211179": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_407_202122-02-2021892": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1823_201906-09-2019996": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1202_201927-06-2019624": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_991_202124-03-20211616": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_656_202104-03-20211785": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_268_202101-02-20211219": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_951_202001-09-2020719": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_479_202018-01-20211355": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2442_201921-11-2019274": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1514_202018-11-2020197": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_875_202023-07-2020277": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_293_202102-02-20211210": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1785_202001-02-20211222": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_747_202122-03-2021337": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_80_202114-01-20211392": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1079_202031-08-2020743": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1471_201903-08-2019192": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1839_201907-09-2019971": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_832_202115-03-2021594": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1145_202101-04-2021289": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1123_201929-08-201915": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_299_202024-02-2020320": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7000039_201918-05-20192209": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1400034_201902-07-20191674": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_949_202116-03-2021574": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000320_201916-11-2019516": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_873_202115-03-2021596": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2510_202018-12-202093": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_798_201903-07-20191648": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_664_202006-06-2020728": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2094_202009-12-2020227": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_378_202103-02-20211339": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1119_201907-09-20191989": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3000046_201919-08-2019357": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000243_201929-08-201929": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_969_202125-03-2021346": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000357_201901-01-20201092": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1287_202021-08-202070": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_902_201906-07-20191579": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_973_202016-07-2020367": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1500138_201924-10-2019863": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_527_202109-02-20211217": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500_202118-03-2021504": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_625_202020-03-202019": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_347_202025-02-2020302": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7000253_201905-09-20192080": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1213_202020-08-202085": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_790_202002-07-2020545": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2296_202015-12-2020137": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1400062_201920-07-20191183": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_907_202031-07-2020237": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_516_202119-02-2021999": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000394_201926-11-2019388": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2428_202016-12-2020122": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1114_202125-03-2021355": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_748_202015-06-2020662": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_781_202025-06-2020591": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_142_202118-01-20211663": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7000185_201910-07-20191476": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_456_202109-02-20211210": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_390_202006-08-2020189": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_214_202007-03-2020116": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1353_201905-10-20191303": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_474_202018-06-2020631": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_307_202128-01-20211479": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_249_202104-02-20211313": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_416_202102-02-20211379": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1400074_201909-08-2019570": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3000216_201929-08-201920": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1007_201909-08-2019558": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_257_202015-02-2020458": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_217_202012-03-202086": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2068_202005-01-20211881": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7000117_201921-06-20191830": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1500184_201928-01-2020866": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000248_201906-09-20192033": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1500182_201917-12-2019112": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1837_201922-01-2020964": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1513_201931-10-2019731": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7000365_201925-10-2019824": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_775_202106-03-2021694": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7000079_201907-06-20191926": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1022_202016-07-2020370": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_693_202005-06-2020744": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1114_202125-03-2021354": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_777_202104-03-2021738": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1411_201910-10-20191247": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2462_202008-12-2020243": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2336_202005-12-2020268": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2599_202021-12-202047": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2309_202005-12-2020267": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1268_202024-08-202052": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2184_202027-01-20211523": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000213_201919-08-2019362": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2591_202012-01-20211769": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_430_202028-02-2020234": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1946_202022-12-202014": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_127_202112-01-20211765": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2568_202002-01-20211935": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000067_201930-05-20192043": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_854_202022-06-2020610": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1000_202124-03-2021379": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_920_202010-07-2020449": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1400044_201917-07-20191254": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1702_201928-11-2019356": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1062_202120-03-2021472": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_146_202120-01-20211596": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2581_202022-12-202025": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_625_202125-03-2021340": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1568_201931-10-2019737": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2560_202019-12-202061": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7000406_201223-12-201911": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000262_201912-09-20191901": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_566_202111-02-20211166": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000075_201904-06-20191991": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1683_201905-12-2019256": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1288_202108-04-202192": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1195_202113-04-202124": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_640_201923-05-20192145": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_458_202120-02-2021985": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1975_202021-12-202033": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_936_202026-08-202014": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3000240_201902-12-2019321": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_731_201906-06-20191969": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_890_202029-06-2020576": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_142_202002-03-2020204": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2497_202016-12-2020126": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_551_202007-03-2020124": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_898_202004-07-2020518": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_741_202115-03-2021587": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_375_202108-02-20211239": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_856_202108-03-2021665": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_422_202026-02-2020268": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000418_201906-01-20201046": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_11_202107-01-20211806": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1759_201920-12-201945": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7000259_201911-09-20191945": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_711_202006-06-2020731": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_76_202010-02-2020575": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_541_202124-03-2021370": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_700078_201906-06-20191970": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_671_202126-02-2021845": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_412_202125-02-2021875": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_188_202120-01-20211599": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_623_202026-08-202012": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000307_201926-09-20191479": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_896_202006-07-2020508": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3000261_201917-10-20191094": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_759_202103-03-2021771": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000120_201901-05-20192471": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1094_201905-08-2019709": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000116_201921-06-20191829": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1498_201923-10-2019899": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2596_202019-12-202066": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_712_202030-07-2020245": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_775_202018-06-2020638": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1065_201909-08-2019561": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_638_202117-02-20211073": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000203_201924-07-20191025": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000311_201926-09-20191482": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_352_202108-02-20211237": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_526_202109-02-20211216": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000295_201925-09-20191509": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2245_202016-12-2020111": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_735_202015-06-2020661": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2584_202008-01-20211799": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_377_202101-02-20211397": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_332_202130-01-20211416": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_617_202123-02-2021945": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1143_202029-07-2020271": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1500124_201914-10-20191189": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1012_202015-07-2020390": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1478_201923-10-2019897": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2511_202030-01-20211420": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7000393_201919-12-201974": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000053_201928-05-20192093": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_952_202103-04-2021193": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7000022_201917-05-20192226": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1184_202107-04-2021119": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_504_202019-03-202032": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_21_202021-01-2020981": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_40_202023-01-2020920": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3000146_201908-07-20191545": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7000341_201918-10-20191052": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000177_201904-07-20191638": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000410_201904-12-2019294": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000207_201920-01-20201002": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_9_202010-02-2020571": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_959_202123-03-2021413": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2079_202011-12-2020201": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1500189_201918-01-20201015": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_493_202012-03-2020103": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7000125_201925-06-20191778": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_468_202006-06-2020726": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3000368_201904-02-2020728": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2577_202018-12-2020100": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000348_201921-10-2019979": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_55_202010-02-2020574": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000137_201929-06-20191734": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1400070_201908-08-2019613": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_500_202030-05-2020779": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_653_202101-03-2021816": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000210_201901-08-2019823": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_437_202028-02-2020236": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1055_202007-08-2020178": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2470_202018-12-202088": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1779_201918-12-201989": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1046_202028-07-2020283": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_598_202028-05-2020798": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_10_202113-01-20211718": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3000295_201904-02-2020727": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000366_201925-10-2019825": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2377_202004-12-2020296": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_334_202130-01-20211417": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3000194_201927-08-2019124": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1266_202109-04-202156": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_842_202103-03-2021777": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1734_201905-12-2019261": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1565_201901-11-2019704": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_36_202021-01-2020983": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_755_201914-06-20191878": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1140_202103-04-2021198": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_186_202006-03-2020131": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1193_202109-04-202151": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_161_202007-03-2020112": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_421_202105-02-20211294": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1252_202017-08-2020147": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2295_202027-11-2020343": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_810_201929-06-20191723": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_582_202010-08-2020168": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000069_201930-05-20192045": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2422_202004-01-20211905": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_985_202013-07-2020428": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_336_202128-01-20211483": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_278_202014-02-2020483": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2206_202018-12-202075": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_45_202022-01-2020949": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_215_202025-02-2020289": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1119_202014-08-2020150": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1067_202124-03-2021385": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1018_201931-07-2019843": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_35_202112-01-20211751": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1500193_201918-01-20201016": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_929_202117-03-2021537": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1058_202022-07-2020343": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1143_202122-04-20213": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_249_202015-02-2020452": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1763_201906-12-2019240": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7000404_201902-01-20201076": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_359_202101-02-20211396": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_289_202106-02-20211267": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7000313_201926-09-20191484": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_163_202119-02-2021994": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1240_202108-04-202187": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000094_201907-06-20191941": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1724_201907-12-2019219": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_690_202124-02-2021914": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_50_202108-01-20211787": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_103_202112-01-20211760": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1100_202101-04-2021287": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_788_201928-06-20191746": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1381_201904-10-20191335": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_369_202019-03-202027": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1256_202014-08-2020160": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000421_201909-12-2019207": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_972_202010-07-2020455": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000291_201921-09-20191586": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2547_202002-01-20211932": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_658_202029-05-2020793": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3000220_201918-09-20191706": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_381_202130-01-20211419": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1040_202022-07-2020342": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_124_202112-01-20211763": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_64_202105-01-20211880": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_804_202003-07-2020527": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1892_202021-12-202032": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_390_202103-02-20211340": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_532_202020-03-202010": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1123_202029-07-2020269": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_809_202003-07-2020529": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1231_201911-09-20191935": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7000066_201930-05-20192042": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2467_202008-12-2020247": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_48_202018-02-2020406": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000395_201926-11-2019389": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000245_201929-08-201931": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_348_202102-02-20211372": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_269_202025-02-2020295": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_114_202127-01-20211506": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_585_202124-02-2021908": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_812_201924-06-20191802": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1500175_201917-12-2019111": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_871_202118-03-2021513": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_912_201909-07-20191512": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_275_202125-01-20211546": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000018_201906-05-20192401": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1500164_201904-12-2019290": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_912_202023-07-2020328": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_896_202119-03-2021491": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_737_202011-06-2020689": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000227_201927-08-2019134": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000138_201929-06-20191735": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_250_202111-02-20211149": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_956_202022-07-2020340": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000113_201920-06-20191850": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_943_202123-03-2021411": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_149_202119-01-20211635": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1250_202020-08-202088": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_705_202016-06-2020651": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2455_202009-12-2020232": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2508_202019-12-202058": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_503_202108-02-20211251": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_800_202026-06-2020583": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1288_202025-08-202038": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_938_202004-07-2020522": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1500163_201926-11-2019386": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_184_202102-02-20211365": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1332_201918-09-20191702": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000283_201918-09-20191713": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_33_202023-01-2020919": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_489_202026-08-202010": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_68_202018-02-2020407": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000357_201924-10-2019864": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_660_201908-05-20192354": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1315_202112-04-202132": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_494_202109-02-20211213": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000171_201913-08-2019533": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_944_201908-08-2019599": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7000076_201904-06-20191992": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_692_202109-03-2021629": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7000425_201921-12-201928": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_391_202024-02-2020327": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000136_201921-05-20192180": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7000061_201930-05-20192041": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_626_202010-07-2020441": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_294_202128-01-20211475": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000112_201920-06-20191849": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2435_202018-12-202082": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1500130_201918-10-20191043": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1327_201926-09-20191464": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_885_202104-03-2021750": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1009_202103-04-2021194": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1114_201908-08-2019612": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2505_202015-12-2020156": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1061_202124-03-2021384": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_305_202026-02-2020264": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_676_202005-06-2020740": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_494_202021-03-20202": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_808_202003-07-2020528": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000297_201925-09-20191511": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1230_202024-08-202048": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_627_202125-03-2021341": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_197_202125-01-20211543": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_502_202108-02-20211250": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2565_202002-01-20211934": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1400063_201924-07-20191020": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_649_202009-06-2020708": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_28_201908-05-20192347": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_279_202104-02-20211314": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_769_202104-03-2021735": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000118_201921-06-20191831": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1183_202007-08-2020186": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1503_201921-10-2019974": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7000169_201904-07-20191630": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_446_202007-03-2020121": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1037_201901-08-2019820": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_706_202122-02-2021979": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_14_202107-01-20211807": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_588_201922-06-20191811": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_637_202123-02-2021946": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7000173_201904-07-20191634": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2258_202015-12-2020134": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_621_202024-07-2020312": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_448_202117-02-20211061": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1190_202005-08-2020220": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1135_202014-08-2020152": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1035_202024-07-2020319": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000048_201924-06-20191805": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1251_201924-09-20191535": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2450_202011-12-2020209": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000097_201907-06-20191944": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1159_202108-04-202174": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_388_202024-02-2020325": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000131_201916-05-20192247": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1082_202013-08-2020166": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2492_202002-01-20211928": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3000316_201918-06-2020629": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1721_202011-02-20211168": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_267_202122-02-2021968": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000366_201905-03-2020151": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_81_202106-01-20211850": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2385_202027-11-2020348": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_700070_201904-06-20191984": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000301_201925-09-20191514": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000268_201921-09-20191582": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_782_202122-03-2021446": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1500162_201926-11-2019385": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1179_202103-04-2021200": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1204_202105-04-2021167": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000030_201910-05-20192316": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000131_201928-06-20191751": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000073_201904-06-20191989": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000287_201908-01-20201033": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1400068_201909-08-2019568": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1500105_201924-09-20191544": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7000033_201916-05-20192248": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_646_202119-02-20211008": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000263_201912-09-20191902": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1321_201921-09-20191581": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1021_202117-03-2021541": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1254_201912-09-20191895": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_23_202031-01-2020797": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_223_202018-02-2020416": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7000409_201903-12-2019310": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1356_201911-10-20191208": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7000371_201906-11-2019633": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_285_202101-02-20211388": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_144_202120-01-20211594": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_304_202125-03-2021337": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_636_202117-02-20211072": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_887_202022-06-2020612": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1165_202131-03-2021306": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1149_202006-08-2020196": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2493_202011-12-2020212": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_615_202103-03-2021764": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1336_201905-10-20191300": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1127_202018-08-2020116": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_822_202023-06-2020604": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1113_201917-08-2019399": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2507_202015-12-2020157": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000168_201904-07-20191629": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_506_202019-03-202034": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_346_202020-02-2020357": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000088_201922-06-20191815": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1169_202109-04-202150": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_236_202014-02-2020478": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7000141_201901-07-20191705": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_807_202016-06-2020656": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_615_202004-08-2020224": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_139_202004-03-2020168": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_754_202124-02-2021918": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000183_201907-08-2019646": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1500165_201903-12-2019306": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7000204_201924-07-20191026": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_736_202123-02-2021950": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000389_201921-01-2020999": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1051_201903-08-2019756": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1420_201915-10-20191143": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2632_202012-01-20211772": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000279_201914-10-20191192": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1032_202013-07-2020434": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_515_202108-03-2021650": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2326_202002-12-2020313": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1306_201912-09-20191897": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_653_202015-06-2020658": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_785_202017-06-2020644": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1378_201904-10-20191333": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_368_202129-01-20211444": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_545_202110-02-20211185": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_630_202117-03-2021529": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_131_202011-02-2020538": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_194_202122-01-20211563": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_326_202101-02-20211394": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1109_202022-07-2020352": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1054_202027-07-2020302": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000221_201927-08-2019128": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000080_201907-06-20191927": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000435_201923-01-2020931": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_310_202005-03-2020156": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1500132_201918-10-20191045": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_293_202014-02-2020486": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000201_201923-07-20191075": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000375_201906-02-2020671": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_495_202021-03-20203": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7000081_201907-06-20191928": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_893_202007-07-2020492": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3000172_201909-07-20191514": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7000161_201902-07-20191687": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2017_202015-12-2020130": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_723_201912-06-20191892": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_260_202004-03-2020171": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_730_202107-04-2021115": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_465_202028-02-2020237": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_394_202101-02-20211398": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000188_201916-07-20191275": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1218_201906-09-20192031": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1502_201922-10-2019938": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_199_202012-02-2020515": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2612_202006-01-20211858": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_39_202027-01-2020882": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_300063_201907-06-20191925": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_571_202123-02-2021941": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_956_202113-04-202118": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1065_202125-03-2021352": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000260_201911-09-20191946": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_797_201919-06-20191858": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7000353_201922-10-2019940": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_957_202113-04-202119": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000212_201919-08-2019361": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000253_201917-10-20191090": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1000037_201931-10-2019738": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000197_201922-07-20191129": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_610_202022-06-2020607": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1380_201905-10-20191307": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7000199_201922-07-20191131": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2624_202004-01-20211912": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000159_201917-08-2019402": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_329_202111-02-20211151": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000084_201904-05-20192418": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1079_202101-04-2021286": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1620_201920-11-2019451": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_514_202019-03-202036": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000183_201908-07-20191548": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_772_202115-03-2021589": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_813_201926-06-20191764": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_177_202005-02-2020709": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_915_202119-03-2021492": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000315_201925-11-2019405": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000044_201917-07-20191255": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000329_201906-11-2019630": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_729_202109-03-2021631": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_213_202130-01-20211412": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7000292_201921-09-20191587": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7000235_201929-08-201921": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1500115_201915-10-20191154": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3000184_201909-10-20191281": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3000223_201927-08-2019126": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7000099_201907-06-20191946": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_788_201906-07-2019371": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_950_201903-09-2019793": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_405_202030-06-2020299": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_@_1266_201925-10-2019386": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_1012_201926-08-201951": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_733_202022-09-2020505": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_700_202007-09-2020612": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_805_201919-07-2019311": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_499_202022-07-2020188": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_783_201902-07-2019379": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_655_202010-09-2020586": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_752_201924-07-2019271": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_809_202005-10-2020406": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_189_202112-02-2021380": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_916_201909-08-2019121": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_391_202023-06-2020324": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_260_202018-05-2020438": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_628_202027-08-2020695": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_911_201901-08-2019202": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1095_202021-12-202026": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_1053_201902-09-2019813": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_831_201920-07-2019299": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_568_201903-05-2019558": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_1118_201912-09-2019716": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_1080_201921-09-2019603": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application _@_525_201914-08-2019626": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_@_1283_201907-11-2019319": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_393_202013-07-2020232": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_697_202002-12-2020796": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_209_202118-02-2021359": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_@_943_201906-08-2019152": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_430_202020-07-2020194": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_696_201911-06-2019427": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_479_201901-05-2019572": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_361_202103-04-202170": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_377_202102-04-202186": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_807_201920-07-2019298": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_1100_201921-09-2019604": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_@_743_201911-07-2019349": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_981_201914-08-2019103": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_@_940_201901-08-2019206": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_668_201920-05-2019478": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_306_202109-03-2021229": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_@_1219_201919-10-2019432": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_@_971_201920-08-201972": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_483_202015-07-2020220": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_456_202013-07-2020235": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_@_1395_201906-12-2019154": "DENIED", + "Bail Application _@_404_201914-06-2019842": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_@_766_201922-06-2019405": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application _@_533_201922-08-2019600": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_795_202029-09-2020452": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_587_201903-05-2019561": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application _@_704_201913-11-2019909": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_@_1475_201919-12-201933": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_1035_201927-08-201933": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_278_202103-03-2021286": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_371_202031-07-2020535": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_@_19_202007-01-2020482": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_247_202102-03-2021299": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_79_202122-01-2021497": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_751_202024-09-2020481": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_@_865_201924-07-2019274": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_219_202124-02-2021331": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_@_862_201931-07-2019220": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2_202005-02-2020305": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_428_202007-07-2020266": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_380_202018-06-2020339": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_760_201910-07-2019356": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_1460_201918-12-201945": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_899_202021-10-2020306": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_347_202123-03-2021132": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_429_202004-07-2020280": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_426_202112-04-202128": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_@_1176_201910-10-2019521": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_781_201929-06-2019384": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_92_202122-01-2021498": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_1129_201921-09-2019605": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_283_202103-03-2021290": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_287_202108-03-2021238": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_274_202102-03-2021305": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_412_202103-04-202180": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_250_202103-03-2021274": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_71_202011-02-2020204": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_167_202105-02-2021420": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_@_1370_201928-11-2019201": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_@_655_201917-05-2019487": "DENIED", + "Bail Application _@_460_201910-07-2019760": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_81_202011-02-2020207": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_148_202028-02-202072": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_310_202119-03-2021160": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_32_202003-02-2020326": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_@_1360_201905-12-2019163": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application _@_692_201906-11-2019931": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_860_202013-10-2020341": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1011_202002-12-2020153": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_947_202024-11-2020173": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_@_886_201926-07-2019257": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_216_202123-02-2021343": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_305_202028-05-2020410": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_@_600_201913-05-2019511": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_38_202013-02-2020617": "DENIED", + "Bail Application _@_354_201910-05-2019995": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_45_202007-02-2020280": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_1371_201929-11-2019190": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_1389_201903-12-2019178": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_634_201917-05-2019484": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1001_202025-11-2020167": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_870_201905-08-2019161": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_405_202106-04-202152": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_564_202017-08-2020107": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_522_202006-08-2020157": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_20_202005-02-2020308": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_314_202119-03-2021161": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_@_1183_201911-10-2019512": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_747_202019-09-2020530": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_480_202014-07-2020231": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_134_202128-01-2021473": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_@_574_201903-05-2019559": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_841_201916-07-2019324": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_816_201924-07-2019272": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_586_202021-08-202056": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_1246_201905-11-2019328": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_863_202013-10-2020343": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_786_201901-07-2019383": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_58_202021-01-2020413": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_674_201924-05-2019463": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_1073_201907-09-2019743": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_969_202020-11-2020198": "DENIED", + "Bail Application _@_391_201904-06-2019880": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_128_202128-01-2021471": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_@_1186_201910-10-2019522": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application _@_509_201905-08-2019653": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_77_202116-01-2021559": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_49_202113-01-2021577": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_@_1051_201902-09-2019812": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1120_202004-01-2021657": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application _@_523_201914-08-2019624": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_170_202105-02-2021422": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_520_202019-09-20201801": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_16_202007-02-2020658": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_262_202001-06-2020399": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_498_202017-07-2020210": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_373_202031-07-2020537": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_372_202102-04-202184": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_22_202030-01-2020359": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application _@_370_201923-05-2019908": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_@_1321_201918-11-2019273": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_@_966_201906-08-2019153": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_13_202106-01-2021626": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_1043_201917-09-2019639": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1092_202022-12-202014": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_@_974_201909-08-2019130": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_549_201901-05-2019576": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_375_202126-03-2021103": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_527_202022-09-20201766": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_406_202116-04-202111": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_@_32_202009-01-2020467": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_314_202028-05-2020413": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_1426_201910-12-2019138": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_432_202007-07-2020267": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_602_202020-08-202071": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_246_202102-03-2021298": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_698_202010-09-2020588": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_590_201903-05-2019562": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_873_201920-07-2019307": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_736_202025-09-2020474": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_@_1307_201907-11-2019322": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_370_202031-07-2020534": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1080_202023-12-20204": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_1422_201906-12-2019155": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_127_202029-02-202062": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_796_202001-10-2020420": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_41_202108-01-2021614": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_@_959_201917-08-201993": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_742_201925-06-2019393": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_906_201903-08-2019171": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_470_202015-07-2020217": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_690_201930-05-2019442": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_624_202029-10-20201174": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_@_931_201903-08-2019174": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_36_202111-01-2021599": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_1110_201913-09-2019705": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_1484_201903-01-2020524": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_@_1250_201921-10-2019422": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_264_202102-03-2021302": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_69_202120-01-2021526": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_@_1_202003-01-2020520": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_1443_201918-12-201943": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_975_201920-08-201973": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_772_201901-07-2019381": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application _@_747_201930-11-2019854": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_331_202014-07-2020598": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_945_202009-12-2020118": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_@_1163_201905-10-2019537": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_577_201914-05-2019496": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_@_723_201912-06-2019425": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_571_202012-10-20201488": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_283_202018-05-2020441": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_275_202103-03-2021285": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_370_202031-07-2020533": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_@_1423_201906-01-2020495": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_275_202015-05-2020455": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_236_202011-05-2020472": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1099_202022-12-202015": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_44_202113-01-2021574": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_1408_201904-12-2019172": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_839_201925-07-2019264": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_553_202008-10-20201528": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_521_202005-08-2020183": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_180_202005-03-202040": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1089_202021-12-202025": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_@_1417_201910-12-2019137": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_930_201903-08-2019173": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_@_889_201925-07-2019267": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_@_835_201919-07-2019312": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_336_202015-07-2020573": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_415_202107-04-202149": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_@_910_201902-08-2019185": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_@_1287_201913-11-2019301": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_353_202125-03-2021113": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_633_201917-05-2019483": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_1394_201903-12-2019179": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_49_202005-02-2020312": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_917_202031-10-2020266": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_576_201901-05-2019582": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_@_1189_201904-10-2019548": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_1059_201905-09-2019768": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_436_202027-08-20202011": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_120_202109-02-2021400": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_991_202027-11-2020158": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_383_202103-04-202176": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_888_201925-07-2019266": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_544_202029-09-20201676": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_@_996_201926-08-201949": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_78_202118-01-2021547": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_840_201919-08-201984": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_1486_201923-12-201910": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_358_202012-06-2020354": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application _@_429_201905-08-2019650": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_212_202017-03-202013": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_723_202016-09-2020559": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_@_820_201916-07-2019321": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_681_201925-05-2019452": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_958_201909-08-2019127": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_105_202017-02-2020155": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_348_202118-03-2021178": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_@_895_201905-08-2019163": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_571_201902-05-2019568": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_36_202013-01-2020458": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_757_202021-09-2020520": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_@_953_201903-08-2019180": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_262_202103-03-2021282": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_336_202117-03-2021184": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_41_202018-01-2020770": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_774_202018-05-20201585": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1341_201926-06-2019598": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1701_202017-07-2020454": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2354_202021-09-20201603": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_771_202019-05-20201550": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_172_202028-01-2020658": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1767_202031-07-2020298": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1881_202018-08-2020167": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1127_202010-06-20201176": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_591_202011-05-20201652": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1332_202001-07-2020774": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2728_201923-12-201919": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1884_202018-08-2020168": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1056_201921-05-2019870": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_809_202026-05-20201469": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1599_201931-07-2019275": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_17_202108-01-20212019": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1997_202018-08-2020190": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_464_202005-03-2020157": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_946_202101-04-2021282": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_986_202107-04-2021148": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_369_202027-02-2020256": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_418_202109-02-20211292": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1852_202006-08-2020263": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2468_201907-11-2019419": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1732_202024-07-2020364": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_200_202028-01-2020663": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_149_202018-05-20201865": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1768_202027-07-2020347": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1342_201926-06-2019599": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1440_202022-07-2020400": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2254_202016-09-20201653": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2238_202023-09-20201537": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_916_202124-03-2021421": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2126_201930-09-2019810": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2475_202006-10-20201320": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1463_202015-07-2020524": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1882_202006-08-2020274": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1438_202015-07-2020520": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_709_202122-03-2021438": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1225_202008-06-20201231": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1408_202006-07-2020675": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_897_202102-04-2021208": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2532_202012-10-20201216": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_925_202126-03-2021358": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_607_202103-03-2021814": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1578_202007-07-2020652": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2060_201921-09-2019889": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_921_202029-05-20201375": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_921_202107-04-2021141": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2812_202011-11-2020801": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_479_202111-02-20211217": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1810_202006-08-2020254": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1872_202007-08-2020229": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1675_202015-07-2020557": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1715_202027-07-2020336": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1667_201919-09-2019918": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2420_202028-09-20201455": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_783_202120-03-2021475": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2954_202023-11-2020604": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_328_202006-03-2020117": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1027_202029-05-20201388": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2352_201922-10-2019560": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1499_201903-08-2019208": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_805_202102-04-2021196": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2964_202020-11-2020647": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_670_202109-03-2021686": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2089_202024-08-202091": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_896_202029-05-20201372": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2433_201930-11-2019187": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1106_202003-06-20201301": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2330_202025-09-20201475": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1644_202015-07-2020550": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_816_202026-05-20201471": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_929_202101-04-2021281": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1974_202025-08-202048": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_130_202010-01-2020884": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2372_201923-10-2019536": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_948_202028-05-20201404": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2021_201917-09-2019975": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2503_201920-11-2019315": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_215_202120-01-20211734": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2336_202028-09-20201446": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1340_202020-06-2020905": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_571_202123-02-20211013": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3090_202011-12-2020248": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2285_202001-10-20201386": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_510_202017-03-202058": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_677_202106-03-2021722": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3167_202011-01-20211985": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_696_202015-05-20201603": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2380_201925-10-2019506": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2266_202010-09-20201778": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_543_202106-03-2021711": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3192_202011-01-20211988": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2674_202024-11-2020559": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1432_202001-07-2020778": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_229_202021-01-2020743": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1856_202006-08-2020265": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1697_202017-07-2020451": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1249_202030-06-2020801": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1546_201922-07-2019342": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_421_202013-03-202080": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_244_202104-02-20211410": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1427_202002-07-2020762": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_813_202028-05-20201392": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1449_202016-07-2020469": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1015_202030-05-20201351": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_404_202108-02-20211324": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1248_202012-06-20201094": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1899_202024-08-202071": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2214_201916-10-2019643": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1889_202021-08-2020116": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3052_202003-12-2020413": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_789_202120-03-2021478": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_155_202122-01-20211686": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_680_202016-05-20201597": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2726_201912-12-2019125": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_678_202013-05-20201633": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2856_202017-11-2020694": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1460_202024-07-2020357": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1003_202027-05-20201461": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_296_202011-06-20201822": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_462_202012-03-202090": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_108_202119-01-20211773": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1360_202020-06-2020908": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_188_202006-02-2020531": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2241_201917-10-2019623": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3197_202006-01-20212099": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1921_202025-08-202040": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2719_201918-01-2020785": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1367_202006-07-2020669": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_829_202020-05-20201524": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1634_202014-09-20201696": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1542_201903-08-2019209": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_312_202102-02-20211483": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_683_202120-03-2021468": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2870_202012-11-2020773": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_690_202007-08-2020212": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1062_202002-06-20201315": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_601_202122-03-2021436": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2104_201921-09-2019893": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_652_202106-03-2021717": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1911_202024-08-202078": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_610_202020-03-202013": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_98_202115-01-20211891": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1486_202007-07-2020644": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_961_202026-05-20201490": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_297_202101-02-20211502": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2676_202019-10-20201109": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2059_202021-08-2020136": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_186_202128-01-20211588": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2224_202008-09-20201801": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_997_202002-06-20201308": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_608_202102-03-2021836": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1722_202022-07-2020420": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_765_202119-03-2021497": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1465_202007-07-2020643": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3164_202007-01-20212060": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_753_202021-05-20201497": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1427_201927-06-2019589": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2707_201913-12-2019116": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_175_202020-05-20201852": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1256_202018-06-2020965": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1117_201910-05-20191023": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_995_202004-06-20201278": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2776_201918-12-201948": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1479_201908-07-2019483": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2927_202023-11-2020597": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2568_202012-10-20201226": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_845_202120-03-2021481": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2683_202028-10-2020979": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_691_202014-05-20201620": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1703_202017-07-2020456": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1227_202011-06-20201146": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_940_202027-05-20201447": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_868_202102-04-2021203": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2181_202003-09-20201861": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2121_201916-10-2019634": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2457_202030-09-20201426": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2147_202031-08-20201956": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1740_202023-07-2020385": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_148_202021-01-2020739": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2296_202022-09-20201575": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_402_202028-02-2020229": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1279_202020-06-2020897": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2974_202025-11-2020532": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2253_202019-09-20201620": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2724_201921-12-201931": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2585_202017-10-20201125": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_749_202117-03-2021567": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1329_202020-06-2020904": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1942_201906-09-20191085": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1788_202027-08-20201974": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1364_202006-07-2020668": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_497_202117-02-20211143": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_51_202030-01-2020619": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2028_202026-08-202015": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1040_202127-04-202110": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2388_201906-11-2019436": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1343_201924-06-2019623": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_339_202109-02-20211284": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1702_201902-08-2019232": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1858_201919-09-2019921": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1104_202004-06-20201283": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1859_202006-08-2020267": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_186_202028-01-2020660": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3168_202011-01-20211986": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_216_202128-01-20211593": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1131_201904-05-20191146": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3010_202026-11-2020503": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1493_202023-07-2020376": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1490_202022-07-2020401": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2331_202024-09-20201507": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1594_202010-07-2020573": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1544_202006-07-2020687": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_438_202005-03-2020152": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3195_202006-01-20212097": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_833_202019-05-20201557": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_990_202029-05-20201379": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2310_202023-09-20201547": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_875_202124-03-2021411": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_58_202018-01-2020774": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1780_202031-07-2020305": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3012_202026-11-2020504": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_367_202020-02-2020326": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1759_202024-07-2020370": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_84_202127-01-20211615": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1574_202015-07-2020535": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2742_202028-10-2020989": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2509_202015-10-20201150": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_636_202015-05-20201599": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2823_201903-01-2020983": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_121_202028-01-2020654": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2678_201913-12-2019114": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2229_201904-10-2019757": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1636_202016-07-2020489": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2088_202023-09-20201536": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2210_202010-09-20201755": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2144_202002-09-20201908": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_93_202013-02-2020407": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1129_201909-05-20191052": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1063_202002-06-20201316": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1739_201919-08-2019119": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3102_202015-12-2020167": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1050_202127-04-202112": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2162_201915-10-2019659": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2170_202002-09-20201914": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1099_201910-05-20191018": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1803_202006-08-2020253": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_170_202028-01-2020657": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1879_202006-08-2020273": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1051_202006-06-20201240": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_210_202013-02-2020418": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2091_202024-08-202098": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1996_202018-08-2020189": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1871_201923-09-2019865": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1236_202012-06-20201089": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_187_202028-01-2020661": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_603_202018-03-202049": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2486_202008-10-20201268": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_297_202011-06-20201823": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_491_202018-03-202038": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3057_202009-12-2020297": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_786_202026-05-20201464": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1992_202021-08-2020127": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_161_202118-01-20211842": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2758_202027-10-20201024": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1765_201916-08-2019134": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1642_202015-07-2020548": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1277_201922-06-2019630": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1695_202025-08-202036": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1878_202006-08-2020272": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1061_202119-04-202117": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1552_202015-07-2020530": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_214_202129-01-20211545": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_25_202008-01-2020906": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2756_202021-10-20201083": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_624_202020-03-202015": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_252_202029-01-2020640": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2090_202024-08-202096": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1369_201922-06-2019636": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1130_201904-05-20191145": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1034_202006-06-20201238": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1059_201909-05-20191045": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_156_202105-02-20211381": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2685_202021-10-20201081": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_616_202125-02-2021934": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_892_202101-04-2021279": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2580_201919-11-2019338": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_274_202101-02-20211499": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1056_202127-04-202114": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2208_201915-10-2019661": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1041_202028-05-20201421": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1415_202025-06-2020862": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3940_202024-12-202021": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3998_201916-12-2019151": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1371_201907-05-20191330": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2398_201920-08-2019134": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1870_202022-07-2020217": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__85_202112-01-20212395": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__510_202028-02-2020281": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__827_202118-02-20211424": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4136_201928-02-2020273": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3362_201923-10-20191074": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__502_202024-02-2020424": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__572_202110-02-20211559": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2549_201916-08-2019245": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2352_201908-08-2019337": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__368_202129-01-20211933": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3893_202015-01-20212323": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__859_202018-03-202031": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__59_202112-01-20212392": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1193_201913-05-20191249": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1422_201907-05-20191331": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_325_202122-01-20213537": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3619_202016-12-2020195": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1563_202102-04-2021260": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__3941_202008-01-20212477": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4020_201916-12-2019156": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1651_202123-03-20212822": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1733_202109-04-202160": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3813_201905-12-2019392": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__22_202005-02-2020873": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2165_201901-08-2019465": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2754_201913-09-20191913": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3668_201926-11-2019539": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2193_201931-07-2019496": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1062_201917-05-20191160": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1254_202116-03-2021634": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2927_201923-09-20191726": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__542_202020-02-2020462": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3885_202005-01-20212565": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_936_202119-02-20213240": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4044_201924-07-20191863": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1842_201924-09-20191654": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3610_201925-10-20191027": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1426_202125-03-2021372": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_994_201913-05-20191246": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3936_201910-12-2019289": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2217_201902-08-2019435": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2582_201902-09-20192167": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3263_201922-11-2019581": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__343_202019-02-2020488": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3802_201903-12-2019437": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1487_202123-03-2021441": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__715_202103-03-2021999": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2306_201908-08-2019332": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1488_201929-05-20191061": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_975_202124-02-20213161": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__852_202124-02-20211201": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1142_202104-03-2021979": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__988_202125-02-20211164": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3718_201910-12-2019277": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3364_201922-10-20191109": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1818_201922-07-2019628": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3906_201911-12-2019257": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__959_202101-03-20211088": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2270_201908-08-2019328": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__514_202024-02-2020428": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1361_201906-08-2019364": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2189_201906-09-20192075": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1977_201901-08-2019457": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2140_202025-08-20204": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3149_201911-10-20191363": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2265_201905-08-2019403": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__134_202010-02-2020704": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3232_201922-10-20191104": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1282_202116-03-2021638": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1640_202131-03-2021338": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__551_202029-02-2020272": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1989_201909-08-2019281": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2452_201908-08-2019345": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3869_202012-01-20212407": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1206_202007-01-20212508": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3942_201917-12-2019108": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1846_202113-04-202138": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1709_202015-07-2020257": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1372_202122-03-2021475": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3465_201917-06-20192061": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1537_201904-06-2019997": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3369_201922-10-20191110": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1277_202116-03-2021637": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2626_201916-08-2019247": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4415_201905-08-20191709": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3157_201922-10-20191102": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3650_201918-11-2019683": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2020_201930-07-2019512": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__856_202101-03-20211083": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2448_201929-08-20199": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3711_201903-12-2019434": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3919_201930-01-20201044": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__189_202122-01-20212068": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__507_202024-02-2020425": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4094_201920-12-201963": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1554_201920-05-20191144": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_183_202029-01-20201077": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__254_202012-02-2020640": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__481_202019-02-2020492": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__367_202128-01-20211978": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3113_201901-10-20191515": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__4021_202028-01-20211988": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1486_201914-05-20191228": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1643_202101-04-2021311": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3268_201916-10-20191276": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3832_201906-12-2019355": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3744_202011-12-2020369": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1750_202131-03-20212756": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3506_201918-06-20192056": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1564_201909-05-20191283": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1581_201906-06-2019985": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__403_202013-02-2020624": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2175_201901-08-2019467": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1199_202103-03-20213088": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__55_202118-01-20212214": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3191_201913-11-2019768": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1109_202110-03-2021725": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2219_201916-08-2019227": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1432_202119-03-2021520": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3067_201901-10-20191511": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2844_201911-09-20192029": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__609_202108-02-20211653": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__325_202130-01-20211889": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1611_202101-04-2021308": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2371_201919-08-2019179": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__654_202117-02-20211462": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__4063_202018-01-20212233": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1544_202101-04-2021303": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2919_201903-10-20191469": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1888_202015-07-2020262": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__8_202003-02-2020941": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4011_201912-12-2019236": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1230_201917-07-2019712": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1508_202124-03-2021411": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__472_202110-02-20211554": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1857_202020-07-2020242": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1292_202105-04-2021182": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__722_202017-03-202057": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1339_202108-03-20212986": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__116_202010-02-2020703": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__912_202123-02-20211260": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__950_202108-03-2021833": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1817_201924-07-2019594": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3179_201917-10-20191216": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1425_201917-05-20191165": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1001_202109-03-2021778": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__900_202102-03-20211044": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1844_202015-07-2020261": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4142_201906-01-20201356": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__391_202106-02-20211707": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3790_201909-12-2019310": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__926_202102-03-20211047": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1470_201931-05-20191027": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__299_202104-02-20211791": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__736_202012-03-2020122": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1519_201908-05-20191310": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3013_201925-10-20191013": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__919_202109-03-2021774": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__256_202122-01-20212073": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2008_202119-04-20212625": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1018_202109-03-2021780": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1131_202104-03-2021976": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3934_201905-12-2019400": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2574_201927-09-20191567": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1868_202109-04-202169": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1712_202014-07-2020283": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__19_202112-01-20212387": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1556_202119-03-2021529": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__735_202111-02-20211528": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__722_202117-02-20211469": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1070_202022-12-202057": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1277_202105-03-20213042": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__219_202127-01-20212005": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__4018_202006-01-20212545": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_299_202116-01-20213606": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2658_201930-09-20191540": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3009_201915-10-20191301": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2249_201920-08-2019126": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3705_201926-11-2019544": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__863_202109-03-2021772": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2851_201912-09-20191972": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1043_202101-03-20211098": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3046_201903-10-20191476": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__972_202101-03-20211090": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__738_202122-02-20211295": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4016_201917-12-2019113": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__558_202103-02-20211852": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__23_202006-02-2020851": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1962_201926-07-2019552": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__819_202104-03-2021953": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3497_201925-10-20191025": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__499_202027-02-2020316": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1741_202109-04-202161": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1129_202104-03-2021975": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__442_202104-02-20211805": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__79_202003-02-2020951": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__934_202124-02-20211208": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_717_202005-03-20201504": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3209_201910-10-20191401": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_185_202027-01-20201891": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_281_202116-01-20213605": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2124_201909-09-20192046": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__62_202031-01-20201003": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2256_201931-07-2019497": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1512_201924-05-20191105": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__976_202104-03-2021962": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1259_201901-05-20191405": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3441_201923-10-20191078": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__742_202117-02-20211470": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__3805_202012-01-20212406": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__4078_202008-01-20212484": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2487_201930-08-20192203": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__545_202028-02-2020286": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2341_201919-08-2019178": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1104_202118-03-2021549": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3684_201920-11-2019622": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__4033_202007-01-20212517": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2523_201913-09-20191904": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1969_201922-07-2019632": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3097_201910-10-20191395": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1881_201916-08-2019212": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__275_202122-01-20212078": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2075_202013-08-202070": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2086_201908-08-2019319": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2598_201916-10-20191262": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_192_202029-01-20201079": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_927_202119-02-20213236": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__488_202109-02-20211592": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3912_201910-12-2019286": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3796_201927-11-2019511": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__283_202122-01-20212079": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3876_201911-12-2019255": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2894_201911-09-20192033": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1949_201915-07-2019769": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4029_201920-12-201957": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2885_201901-10-20191503": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__291_202024-02-2020416": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__160_202104-02-20211786": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3994_202005-01-20212573": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2465_201927-08-201966": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1041_202104-03-2021966": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3178_201910-10-20191400": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1655_202113-04-202134": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1947_201924-07-2019602": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__285_202118-01-20212227": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1612_201910-06-2019975": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2830_201906-09-20192112": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__855_202125-02-20211152": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3943_201911-12-2019259": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4086_201920-12-201960": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2209_201909-08-2019286": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1623_202122-03-20212845": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2513_201912-09-20191949": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3657_201913-11-2019783": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3624_201919-11-2019649": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__299_202012-02-2020644": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3798_202016-12-2020210": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__273_202119-01-20212174": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3408_201914-06-20192067": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__650_202027-02-2020326": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1442_202118-03-2021567": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__421_202117-02-20211450": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3102_201904-10-20191431": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_741_202118-02-20213262": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3801_201911-12-2019253": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3911_201909-12-2019322": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1205_202112-03-2021686": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3007_201922-05-20192208": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1601_202123-03-2021450": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__185_202112-01-20212403": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1325_202110-03-2021747": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1583_201920-05-20191147": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1723_202106-04-2021164": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__234_202007-02-2020828": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2753_201912-09-20191965": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1584_201920-05-20191148": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2013_202014-08-202038": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__4005_202002-01-20212603": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__142_202028-02-2020277": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2281_201920-08-2019130": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2891_201924-09-20191673": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1064_201914-05-20191215": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__642_202003-03-2020228": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1987_201926-07-2019555": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__37_202011-02-2020674": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__3789_202014-12-2020271": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__685_202124-02-20211191": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_69_202105-01-20213747": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__776_202111-02-20211537": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__181_202106-02-20211702": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2221_201919-08-2019171": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__554_202109-02-20211595": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3729_201903-12-2019435": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2244_201901-08-2019472": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__752_202117-02-20211471": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1153_202104-03-2021981": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1309_201909-05-20191273": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_95_202030-01-20201026": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__355_202130-01-20211890": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4244_201908-01-20201298": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3196_201931-05-20192135": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1847_201926-07-2019544": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__438_202024-02-2020420": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3109_201904-10-20191432": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4405_201905-08-20191705": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2698_201927-08-201983": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1533_202023-07-2020185": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__110_202130-01-20211880": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__632_202125-02-20211143": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_38_202029-01-20201065": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3932_202023-12-202046": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_27_202102-01-20213767": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_451_202127-01-20213506": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3230_201903-06-20192120": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__877_202116-03-2021625": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1080_202101-03-20213114": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1849_202108-04-2021102": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__122_202013-02-2020612": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1578_202124-03-2021412": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1756_202105-04-2021204": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1919_201922-07-2019631": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1163_202105-04-2021181": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1946_202031-07-2020111": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2488_201927-08-201967": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__710_202017-03-202056": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2435_201908-08-2019343": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__452_202022-07-2020205": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1980_201917-07-2019734": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2005_201919-07-2019653": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3745_201929-11-2019471": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__393_202119-02-20211352": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4046_201903-01-20201400": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1723_201916-07-2019746": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2412_201902-08-2019439": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2373_201920-08-2019132": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__672_202027-02-2020327": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1167_202110-03-2021730": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1792_202107-04-2021132": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__699_202118-02-20211405": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3807_201903-12-2019440": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2760_201911-09-20192023": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4332_201901-08-20191768": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4418_201905-08-20191712": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__713_202118-02-20211408": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2039_201908-08-2019314": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__808_202118-02-20211420": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3250_201904-06-20192109": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2083_202010-08-202090": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__116_202115-01-20212307": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1157_202110-03-2021727": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__3977_202007-01-20212514": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_931_202119-02-20213238": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1951_202027-07-2020176": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3212_201917-10-20191219": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3070_201924-10-20191045": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__478_202118-02-20211395": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3176_201901-10-20191519": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1159_202123-03-2021429": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__208_202120-01-20212139": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3962_201905-12-2019402": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2482_201916-08-2019240": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2937_201906-09-20192124": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3885_201910-12-2019282": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2665_201930-08-20192216": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2223_201919-08-2019172": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1210_201914-05-20191218": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4101_201907-01-20201325": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2084_202010-08-202091": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__233_202011-02-2020678": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3965_201920-12-201947": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2268_201926-07-2019567": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__309_202017-02-2020550": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2239_201917-10-20191208": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__956_202018-03-202039": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1118_202106-03-2021890": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_341_202118-01-20213597": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4199_201901-01-20201465": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__646_202005-03-2020172": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__76_202003-02-2020950": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1797_201918-07-2019677": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__341_202105-02-20211749": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__46_202004-02-2020910": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__432_202130-01-20211897": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1589_202102-04-2021262": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__136_202017-02-2020543": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1738_202123-04-20211": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1588_202101-04-2021305": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3211_201924-10-20191048": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1930_202027-07-2020175": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__750_202109-03-2021771": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__921_202006-03-2020160": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__496_202106-02-20211718": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3863_201912-12-2019223": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3513_201922-10-20191121": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3632_201919-11-2019650": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2899_201924-09-20191674": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_663_202105-02-20213375": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2761_201912-09-20191967": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__392_202106-02-20211708": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__935_202102-03-20211048": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1815_202015-07-2020260": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__137_202130-01-20211881": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3768_202017-12-2020162": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2850_201912-09-20191971": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4907_201927-08-20191474": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2862_201912-09-20191973": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__303_202125-01-20212048": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__755_202118-02-20211413": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1285_202116-03-2021639": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__922_202018-03-202033": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1079_202125-02-20213140": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1617_201922-05-20191132": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3452_201927-11-2019503": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__618_202106-02-20211724": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__158_202019-02-2020483": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2740_201906-09-20192101": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1926_202023-07-2020200": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1886_202020-07-2020243": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_143_202105-03-2021116": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2683_201901-10-20191498": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__43_202117-02-20211446": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__648_202005-03-2020173": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3714_201926-11-2019545": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2028_202013-08-202064": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1831_202027-07-2020164": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4000_201923-12-201912": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1418_202118-03-2021564": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2614_201917-08-2019195": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3722_201919-11-2019655": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2938_201916-05-20192262": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2659_201906-09-20192095": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__353_202127-01-20212016": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__297_202125-01-20212047": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3679_201920-11-2019621": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1809_202103-04-20212730": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1394_202119-03-2021516": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__636_202111-02-20211519": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1986_202028-07-2020150": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3973_201912-12-2019232": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3953_201904-02-2020901": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1155_202110-03-2021726": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__839_202124-02-20211199": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1116_202108-03-2021836": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4257_201914-01-20201220": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1660_201914-06-2019951": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4015_201916-12-2019155": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1878_202012-08-202074": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__296_202003-03-2020223": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1308_201904-05-20191354": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3975_201922-07-20191892": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3785_201909-12-2019307": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3038_201924-05-20192192": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2122_202013-08-202072": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2607_201903-10-20191460": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__951_202109-03-2021775": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1964_202116-04-202123": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1173_202108-03-2021847": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2348_201906-09-20192083": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3553_201912-11-2019818": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4152_201902-01-20201436": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4080_201917-12-2019121": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1612_202105-04-2021187": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1194_202102-03-20213106": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3670_201915-11-2019722": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__730_202027-02-2020335": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1217_202116-03-2021631": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__365_202122-02-20211278": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2998_201901-10-20191509": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1878_201924-07-2019597": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1615_201922-05-20191131": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4169_201903-01-20201410": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1511_202122-03-2021485": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1328_202118-03-2021558": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__111_202129-01-20211924": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3448_201914-11-2019739": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__635_202109-02-20211605": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2021_201930-07-2019513": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_94_202028-01-20201126": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__77_202130-01-20211879": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__342_202018-02-2020527": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2462_201930-08-20192202": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1629_202101-04-2021309": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__290_202012-02-2020643": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1938_202012-08-202075": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1134_202118-03-2021550": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__437_202018-03-202026": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3817_201903-01-20201396": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__614_202025-02-2020398": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1162_202105-03-2021928": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__518_202025-02-2020389": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2019_201901-08-2019459": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2136_201908-08-2019320": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1421_202117-03-2021613": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_930_202122-02-20213192": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3875_201909-12-2019317": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_23_202004-01-20201374": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3269_201911-10-20191373": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2691_201927-08-201982": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4303_201901-08-20191757": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__235_202121-01-20212098": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__318_202019-02-2020487": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1604_202108-04-202187": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__406_202103-02-20211840": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1007_202123-02-20213171": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4246_201903-01-20201416": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__458_202024-02-2020421": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__564_202106-02-20211722": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3728_201922-11-2019589": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3145_201917-10-20191214": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1323_201907-05-20191326": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3546_202019-12-2020113": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2822_201908-05-20192307": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1802_201908-08-2019310": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__593_202105-02-20211769": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3085_201903-10-20191480": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2031_201922-07-2019634": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_932_202122-02-20213194": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1716_201906-06-2019988": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1746_202103-04-2021248": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2764_201916-09-20191784": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__405_202129-01-20211937": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2103_201916-08-2019219": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3220_201918-10-20191168": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1984_201919-07-2019651": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3569_201915-11-2019713": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1178_202108-03-2021848": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__489_202105-02-20211765": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2991_201916-09-20191799": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1152_202105-03-2021927": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1023_202101-03-20211097": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__720_202117-02-20211468": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1907_202020-07-2020245": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1130_202109-03-2021787": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__552_202117-02-20211456": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1687_201929-05-20191066": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2126_202012-08-202087": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__4002_202008-01-20212479": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_773_202111-02-20213303": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4926_201927-08-20191486": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2133_201924-09-20191655": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2738_201916-09-20191781": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1905_201922-07-2019629": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__218_202127-01-20212004": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1560_201928-05-20191082": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__660_202109-02-20211610": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__3911_202022-12-202068": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4216_201902-01-20201441": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__657_202110-02-20211563": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_176_202111-01-20213644": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2882_201912-09-20191975": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2163_201927-08-201962": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__494_202118-02-20211397": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__82_202111-01-20212432": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2000_201924-07-2019606": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3917_201917-12-2019105": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1529_201928-05-20191081": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2642_201903-10-20191462": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2187_201924-07-2019611": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__86_202115-01-20212298": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1266_202104-03-20213078": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4130_201907-01-20201326": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__458_202108-02-20211641": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1247_202122-03-2021471": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2183_201906-08-2019369": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__896_202110-03-2021719": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3689_201925-11-2019565": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__603_202117-02-20211460": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2896_201911-11-2019850": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__428_202014-02-2020591": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1756_201902-08-2019418": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__3727_202017-12-2020161": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2637_201927-08-201979": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3609_201905-12-2019382": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4560_201908-08-20191687": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1977_202012-08-202078": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1616_202122-03-20212843": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__305_202125-01-20212049": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1914_202027-07-2020172": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__3615_202014-12-2020261": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1240_202103-03-20213096": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__4012_202013-01-20212357": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3511_201926-11-2019530": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1867_202023-07-2020197": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4552_201908-08-20191684": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2615_201912-09-20191954": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__731_202118-02-20211411": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_30_202130-01-2021405": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_211_202014-09-2020275": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_34_202030-01-2020206": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210179_202018-02-2020215": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2000026_202126-03-2021171": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_299_202022-07-202079": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_210101_202029-01-2020581": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210057_202014-01-2020695": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_376_202020-07-2020233": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_346_202003-07-2020265": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_299_202018-06-2020299": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_210095_202029-01-2020575": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2200034_201919-11-2019807": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_357_202007-07-2020258": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210356_201917-09-20191507": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_21_202122-01-2021430": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210422_201911-10-20191197": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210384_201928-09-20191352": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210096_202104-03-2021372": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210648_201913-12-2019427": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_31_202027-01-2020605": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_210230_202029-02-202089": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210543_201921-11-2019770": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210066_202023-01-2020647": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_18_202103-02-2021652": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_377_202020-07-2020234": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_311_202020-06-2020294": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_169_202125-03-2021978": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_210582_201927-11-2019683": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_348_201906-09-2019610": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_10_202112-01-2021445": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210113_202030-01-2020556": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210161_202015-02-2020244": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210094_202029-01-2020574": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_243_202028-10-2020176": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1000006_201905-09-20191754": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_49_202123-02-2021295": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210199_202024-02-2020181": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_63_202103-03-2021250": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_33_202101-02-2021395": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210530_201916-11-2019832": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_398_202018-08-2020213": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_60_202102-03-2021262": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2200044_201919-11-2019808": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_210382_201928-09-20191350": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_187_202125-03-2021176": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_210485_201906-11-2019945": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_371_202015-07-2020242": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_439_202008-09-20201410": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_63_202128-01-20211143": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_210510_201913-11-2019868": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_55_202125-01-20211183": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_210417_201905-10-20191255": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_458_202011-09-20201405": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_132_202106-03-20211080": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_210644_201911-12-2019454": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4_202128-01-2021726": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_640_202025-11-20201002": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_355_202007-07-2020257": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_210656_201916-12-201980": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_64_202103-03-2021251": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210131_202005-02-2020494": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_28_202004-02-2020504": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2800026_202014-09-2020617": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_218_202025-09-2020234": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210196_202024-02-2020180": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210220_202028-02-2020115": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_207_202009-09-2020287": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210320_202003-12-2020141": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210585_201929-11-2019648": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_661_202007-12-2020878": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_607_202011-11-20201129": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_210072_202024-01-2020623": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210182_202018-02-2020218": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_294_201914-08-2019108": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_210528_201916-11-2019830": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210562_201925-11-2019714": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_240002_202102-02-2021678": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_632_202021-11-20201059": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_292_201909-08-2019130": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210489_201907-11-2019918": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210371_201923-09-20191437": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_252_202007-11-2020127": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210346_201913-09-20191680": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_443_202008-09-20201414": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2800075_202006-01-2021909": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_210123_202003-02-2020519": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_61_202011-02-2020156": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6_202104-01-20211334": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_200104_201910-10-20191205": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_210180_202018-02-2020216": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_146_202030-05-2020142": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_359_202009-07-2020250": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_210331_202011-12-202085": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210465_201923-10-20191041": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_488_202021-09-20201389": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_310_201920-08-201967": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210075_202024-01-2020626": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000005_202027-01-2020614": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210219_202028-02-2020114": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_57_202123-02-2021298": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210511_201913-11-2019869": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210039_202103-02-2021660": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210462_201923-10-20191038": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_115_202006-03-202033": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_117_202101-03-20211112": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1700115_201909-12-2019497": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210392_201901-10-20191317": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_609_202011-11-20201131": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_352_201909-09-2019595": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210137_202006-02-2020481": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2200042_201918-11-2019815": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_107_202004-03-202053": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2000026_202016-10-2020478": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_408_201903-10-2019442": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_210239_202004-03-202052": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2800015_202025-08-202016": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_210258_202013-03-202019": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_15_202017-01-2020286": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210659_201916-12-201983": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210133_202005-02-2020496": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_382_202022-07-2020230": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_65_202103-03-2021252": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210106_202030-01-2020549": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2000106_201909-10-20191225": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210673_201918-12-201952": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2100015_202130-01-2021705": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_172_201929-05-2019507": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2100423_201914-10-20191179": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_20008_202013-02-2020274": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_561_201907-12-201915": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2800027_202014-09-2020618": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_210105_202110-03-2021306": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_76_202018-02-202099": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210255_202013-03-202016": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_341_202002-07-2020268": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2300041_201903-12-2019577": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_231_202017-10-2020203": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210638_201910-12-2019469": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210398_201901-10-20191323": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210478_201905-11-2019959": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210390_201930-09-20191339": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1000005_201905-09-20191752": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_363_202009-07-2020253": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_210091_202029-01-2020571": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_636_202023-11-20201031": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_210114_202031-01-2020540": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_238_202019-10-2020199": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210541_201921-11-2019768": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210626_201909-12-2019490": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210666_201917-12-201960": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210600_201903-12-2019576": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210597_201903-12-2019573": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_241_202023-10-2020183": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210634_201910-12-2019465": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210375_201926-09-20191387": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210654_201916-12-201978": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210493_201911-11-2019896": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_391_202017-08-2020219": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_118_202006-03-202036": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_210120_202003-02-2020516": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210474_201902-11-2019976": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210544_201921-11-2019771": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210540_201921-11-2019767": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000035_202019-03-20202": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_590_202005-11-20201191": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_210431_201915-10-20191158": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210624_201909-12-2019488": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2000012_202123-02-2021464": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_210464_201923-10-20191040": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000134_201929-08-201917": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_200113_201905-11-2019958": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_300026_202118-03-2021243": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_767_201928-11-2019658": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_88_202026-02-202089": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210103_202029-01-2020583": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_337_201902-09-2019638": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_178_202007-07-202085": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210160_202015-02-2020243": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_34_202101-02-2021396": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_149_202117-03-20211047": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_210086_202027-01-2020611": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210539_201921-11-2019766": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210240_202004-03-202053": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_489_202022-09-20201386": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2400006_202025-02-2020156": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_13_202018-01-2020272": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1500040_202102-04-2021959": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_572_202002-01-2021947": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_240008_202001-02-2020531": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210350_201916-09-20191523": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_657_202027-01-2021744": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100012_202003-11-2020340": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_365_202010-07-2020249": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_481_202016-09-20201404": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_546_202014-10-20201354": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_280052_202031-10-2020366": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_120_202103-03-20211098": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2000100_201924-09-20191422": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210527_201915-11-2019849": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210136_202005-02-2020499": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_15_202118-02-2021504": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210635_201910-12-2019466": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_133_202018-03-20202": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1000004_201907-09-20191725": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_367_201917-09-2019562": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_300_202018-06-2020300": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_280001_202107-01-2021899": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_210579_201927-11-2019680": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210235_202003-03-202060": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210427_201914-10-20191177": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210568_201925-11-2019720": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_379_202021-07-2020232": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_300039_202115-03-2021282": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210452_201917-10-20191112": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2800020_202010-09-2020636": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_440_201919-10-2019335": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_294_202016-06-2020310": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_210573_201926-11-2019700": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1500046_202109-04-2021955": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_324_202024-06-2020292": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_12_202113-01-2021438": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_379_201920-09-2019529": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_695_202019-12-2020750": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_210332_201909-09-20191711": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210139_202006-02-2020483": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210190_202024-02-2020174": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_504_202006-10-20201376": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_338_201902-09-2019639": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210491_201907-11-2019920": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_300077_202020-10-2020433": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210424_201914-10-20191174": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210118_202003-02-2020514": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210359_201919-09-20191481": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_300022_202123-02-2021463": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210222_202028-02-2020117": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210178_202018-02-2020214": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_217_202019-09-2020248": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2000017_202112-03-2021288": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_71_202110-03-2021198": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_210456_201921-10-20191064": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210164_202015-02-2020247": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_549_202014-10-20201357": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_210368_201920-09-20191467": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_409_202025-08-2020203": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_210611_201906-12-2019522": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210632_201909-12-2019496": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210194_202024-02-2020178": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_72_202014-02-2020120": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_317_201921-08-201952": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_332_202026-06-2020283": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_210495_201907-11-2019923": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210218_202028-02-2020113": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210321_201929-08-201915": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210432_201916-10-20191128": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210204_202025-02-2020153": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_715_201923-12-20191": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1264_201913-09-20191583": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_413_201914-08-2019178": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_715_201908-05-20191544": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1065_202007-08-2020154": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1969_201912-12-2019418": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_197_202017-02-2020426": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_593_202009-06-2020750": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1241_202007-09-20201853": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1546_202020-10-20201236": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1876_202003-12-2020605": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_10_202007-02-202092": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1804_201918-11-2019731": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_806_201921-05-20191396": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1713_202009-11-2020901": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_753_201901-05-20191663": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1647_202022-10-20201186": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1757_202006-11-2020948": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_369_201915-07-2019265": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1528_202009-10-20201352": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_172_202127-01-2021845": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1995_202018-12-202074": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1642_202022-10-20201184": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_465_201927-08-201966": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2000_202017-12-202092": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_166_202012-02-2020474": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_199_202003-03-2020214": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1523_202015-10-20201295": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1042_201910-07-2019960": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1447_201917-09-20191387": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_404_202017-06-2020678": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1882_202003-12-2020606": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1954_202009-12-2020535": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1223_201905-08-2019319": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_700_201929-11-201991": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_123_202005-02-2020734": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1358_202018-09-20201642": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_431_201920-08-2019119": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_938_202020-07-2020326": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_265_202122-02-2021621": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_31_202025-02-202046": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_805_201917-05-20191440": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1135_202027-08-20201982": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_656_202015-06-2020713": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_58_202020-02-202052": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1414_201905-09-20191668": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1099_202017-08-2020110": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1384_202030-09-20201465": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1353_201929-08-201914": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1097_201917-07-2019580": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1919_201906-12-2019504": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_474_201929-08-201912": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_878_201918-06-20191138": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1232_202004-09-20201875": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_654_201920-11-2019168": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_768_202003-07-2020538": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_663_201922-11-2019152": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_288_202124-02-2021586": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_600_201922-10-2019299": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_467_201928-08-201929": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_438_201927-08-201940": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1190_202002-09-20201911": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_98_202119-01-2021976": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_737_202015-07-2020377": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_651_201918-11-2019187": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1666_202022-10-20201190": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_802_201921-05-20191395": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_29_202025-02-2020285": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1041_202006-08-2020166": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_550_201909-10-2019429": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1449_202020-10-20201227": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_36_202108-01-20211170": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_34_202026-02-202042": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_414_202002-06-2020832": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1891_202023-11-2020705": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1210_201925-07-2019442": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_195_202106-02-2021748": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_746_201909-05-20191532": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_72_202007-02-2020700": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_955_201901-07-20191101": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_45_202011-02-2020488": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1709_202004-11-2020990": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_503_201917-09-2019569": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1223_202016-09-20201660": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1606_201901-11-2019885": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_97_202023-01-2020883": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_577_201915-10-2019376": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1847_201902-12-2019555": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_462_202022-01-2021931": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1906_201906-12-2019502": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_456_201927-08-201957": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_219_202025-02-2020293": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_454_202029-05-2020875": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_877_201901-06-20191225": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_458_201927-08-201959": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2012_202021-12-202054": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_897_202016-07-2020355": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_403_202006-07-2020502": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1182_201914-08-2019202": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_305_202126-02-2021565": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_156_202125-01-2021912": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1540_201903-10-20191223": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_904_202022-07-2020296": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1720_202009-11-2020902": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_62_202006-02-2020717": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_463_202021-03-20207": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_599_201922-10-2019298": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_362_201911-07-2019287": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_851_201929-05-20191283": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1599_202023-10-20201169": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_444_201927-08-201946": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1655_201923-10-2019964": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1927_202007-12-2020567": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_822_201922-05-20191378": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_590_202024-06-2020615": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_147_202122-01-2021929": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_467_202030-09-20201463": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_11_202003-02-2020104": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1567_201910-10-20191166": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_927_201905-07-20191029": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_639_201913-11-2019220": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1373_201926-09-20191295": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_192_202103-02-2021782": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_33_202026-02-202041": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1944_202008-12-2020549": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1884_202023-11-2020704": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_198_202102-02-2021796": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1154_202004-09-20201867": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_573_202120-04-202126": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_226_202108-02-2021743": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1513_201901-10-20191244": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_428_201922-08-201983": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_148_202006-03-20209": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_664_202024-06-2020619": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1131_202026-08-202010": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1749_202006-11-2020946": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_643_201916-11-2019190": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1584_202023-10-20201161": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_405_201906-08-2019214": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1101_202019-08-202074": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_522_201906-09-2019635": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_604_201921-10-2019318": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1148_202025-08-202029": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_449_202117-03-2021411": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1237_201906-08-2019304": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1558_201904-10-20191208": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_192_202014-02-2020445": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1604_202027-10-20201091": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_146_202122-01-2021928": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_544_201903-10-2019455": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1257_202009-09-20201811": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_824_201916-05-20191467": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_119_202119-01-2021981": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1318_201926-08-201972": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_665_201922-11-2019154": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_833_202007-07-2020497": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1937_202010-12-2020517": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_623_201925-10-2019277": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_294_202016-06-2020699": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_358_201910-07-2019304": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_366_201915-07-2019262": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_598_201922-10-2019297": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_928_201908-07-20191003": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_464_202011-11-2020862": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_737_201920-05-20191407": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_686_202126-04-20215": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_359_201910-07-2019305": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_509_201919-09-2019540": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_22_202111-01-20211139": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_939_201918-06-20191140": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1467_202020-10-20201231": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1674_202022-10-20201191": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_398_201905-08-2019222": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1496_202007-10-20201387": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_70_202010-02-2020504": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_43_202111-01-20211148": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_462_201927-08-201963": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_905_201903-06-20191217": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1668_202007-11-2020932": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1491_201927-09-20191282": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_845_201930-05-20191262": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1292_202009-09-20201817": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_911_202016-07-2020358": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_433_201920-08-2019121": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_383_202017-03-202091": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_334_201904-07-2019344": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_770_202029-06-2020581": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_74_202013-01-20201020": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_656_201921-11-2019162": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_848_201927-05-20191344": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1936_201910-12-2019458": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_614_201923-10-2019289": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100_202030-01-2020809": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_468_201928-08-201930": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1977_201918-12-201981": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1416_201913-09-20191589": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_557_201910-10-2019415": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_325_201903-07-2019356": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_447_201927-08-201949": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_357_201910-07-2019303": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_203_202102-02-2021797": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_963_202017-08-2020103": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1801_201922-11-2019651": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1086_202013-08-2020125": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1926_202007-12-2020566": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2010_202021-12-202052": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1471_202030-09-20201470": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1672_201922-10-2019992": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_626_201901-11-2019257": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1137_202027-08-20201984": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1862_202020-11-2020723": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1684_201922-10-2019993": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_629_201901-11-2019259": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_945_201903-07-20191067": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_489_201906-09-2019628": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_221_202106-02-2021749": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_386_201902-08-2019234": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1144_201925-07-2019435": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2030_202022-12-202045": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_83_202031-01-2020782": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_366_202126-02-2021572": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_143_202005-03-202010": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_556_201910-10-2019414": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1636_202022-10-20201183": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1429_201927-09-20191279": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1741_202012-11-2020791": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_330_201904-07-2019340": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1683_202029-10-20201043": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_488_201903-09-2019650": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_565_201911-10-2019406": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1468_202030-09-20201469": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1064_201911-07-2019940": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1220_201906-08-2019300": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1910_202002-12-2020620": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_64_202113-01-20211092": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2045_202021-12-202060": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1098_201917-07-2019581": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_76_202018-01-2020972": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_35_202009-01-20201063": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_77_202004-02-2020753": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1616_202029-10-20201037": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1920_201905-12-2019513": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1946_202008-12-2020551": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_655_201921-11-2019161": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1544_202009-10-20201356": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_549_201905-10-2019433": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1171_202031-08-20201943": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_465_202020-01-2021964": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_133_202003-03-202016": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1357_202029-09-20201493": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_426_202028-05-2020882": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1308_202014-09-20201710": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1404_201920-09-20191362": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_30_202025-02-202045": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1111_202018-08-202090": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_872_201903-06-20191210": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_582_202126-03-2021222": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1319_202015-09-20201692": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1248_202007-09-20201855": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1284_201916-08-2019188": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_960_201923-07-2019487": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1188_202002-09-20201909": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_583_201916-10-2019357": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1868_202026-11-2020659": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1948_201916-12-2019113": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_739_201920-05-20191409": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1471_201923-09-20191346": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_116_202021-01-2020940": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_707_201906-12-201934": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1980_201916-12-2019116": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2073_202005-01-20211295": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_653_201918-11-2019189": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_490_201906-09-2019629": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_411_202110-03-2021465": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_402_201906-08-2019211": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_908_201907-06-20191195": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_576_202006-07-2020503": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1366_202023-09-20201578": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1183_202007-09-20201848": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1914_202004-12-2020594": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_138_202120-01-2021960": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_409_202124-03-2021314": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1167_202001-09-20201927": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1412_202005-10-20201423": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1136_201925-07-2019434": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_350_201910-07-2019296": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_218_202110-02-2021719": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_319_201903-07-2019351": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1142_201920-08-2019140": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_561_201910-10-2019419": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_510_202017-07-2020340": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_883_201901-06-20191226": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_42_202010-01-20201039": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_708_201906-12-201935": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1982_201912-12-2019420": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_218_202019-02-2020374": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_31_202006-01-20201123": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_216_202112-02-2021693": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1615_201918-10-20191052": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_355_202018-03-202067": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_194_202129-01-2021820": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_262_202104-02-20211641": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_142_202019-09-202099": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1216_201916-07-2019803": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1975_201902-11-20191401": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_62_202018-08-202018": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2018_201915-11-20191177": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_93_202117-02-2021210": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_91_202022-01-20201326": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_928_201930-05-20191466": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1949_202019-12-202093": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_608_202116-04-20212507": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1344_201903-08-2019449": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2015_202021-12-202076": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_18_202115-01-2021171": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_611_202123-04-20211": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1356_201929-07-2019562": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_879_202107-04-2021149": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2208_201928-11-2019830": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_29_202122-01-2021103": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1381_202018-09-20201471": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_182_202022-01-20201334": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1996_201916-11-20191145": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_72_202006-07-202056": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2001_201923-11-2019928": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_892_202021-07-2020281": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_776_202108-04-2021117": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_68_202111-02-2021115": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2175_201929-11-2019790": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1709_201918-09-20192121": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_456_202101-03-20211009": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1605_201911-09-20192396": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1968_202011-12-2020431": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1574_201909-09-20192416": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1538_201930-08-20192627": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1257_201914-10-20192798": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_377_202125-02-20211076": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1241_202016-09-20201497": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_910_201925-06-20191241": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_184_202106-02-20211561": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1034_202030-07-2020194": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1404_202024-09-20201377": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1152_202027-10-20202399": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1833_202023-11-2020629": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_42_202016-07-202059": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1396_202019-09-20201457": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1054_202031-07-2020174": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1288_202016-09-20201501": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1694_201903-10-20191844": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_150_202006-02-20201031": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_360_202007-03-2020131": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1304_202010-09-20201588": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1720_201926-09-20191950": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1698_202029-10-2020941": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_761_202108-04-2021113": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_419_202101-03-20211006": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1736_201924-09-20191993": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1700_201919-09-20192087": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2252_201910-12-2019579": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_380_202115-03-20212757": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_169_202127-01-20211868": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5_202005-02-202041": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1045_201910-07-2019981": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1881_201915-10-20191722": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1595_202014-10-20201154": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_134_202016-09-2020101": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_411_202116-03-20212737": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2147_202012-01-20212235": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1530_201903-09-20192536": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1636_201909-09-20192418": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1719_201916-09-20192179": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_66_202008-01-20201655": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_50_202107-01-20213428": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1253_202005-09-20201668": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_246_202012-03-202099": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1174_201911-07-2019960": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_256_202122-02-20212992": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_112_202013-01-20201557": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1621_202029-10-2020934": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_149_202119-01-20212048": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_241_201925-11-201931": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_409_202116-03-20212735": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1306_201926-07-2019625": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1269_202020-11-20202114": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1174_202028-08-20201759": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1043_201922-06-20191286": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_568_202105-03-2021867": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2164_201925-11-2019901": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1359_201903-08-2019451": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_154_202030-09-202086": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2412_201909-01-20201626": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_406_202116-03-20212732": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2257_201911-12-2019548": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1926_201902-11-20191396": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1578_201905-09-20192486": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1157_201917-07-2019774": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2278_201904-12-2019708": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1444_202019-12-20201834": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_269_202101-02-20211741": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1339_202015-09-20201522": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_57_202017-08-202019": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2066_201918-11-20191120": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_231_202130-01-20211767": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1264_202016-09-20201499": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2286_201904-12-2019710": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_120_202108-03-202133": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_38_202129-01-2021149": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_245_202014-02-2020633": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_42_202125-01-2021272": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_67_202008-01-20201656": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_65_202102-03-202124": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_18_202112-01-2021134": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_69_202122-02-202155": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_63_202019-08-202015": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1240_202031-08-20201743": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1699_201916-09-20192178": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_48_202109-02-202171": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_37_202129-01-2021148": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1326_202014-09-20201545": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_113_202013-01-20201558": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1382_201901-08-2019490": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1977_202022-12-202057": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1000_201906-07-20191053": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103_202118-01-20212077": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1737_201924-09-20191994": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1194_201911-07-2019961": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2346_201911-12-2019553": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_350_202026-02-2020372": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_104_202102-03-202155": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_17_202004-01-20201749": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1290_202008-09-20201627": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1614_202022-10-20201016": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1327_201905-08-2019421": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1204_202007-09-20201642": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_748_202126-03-2021360": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_529_202105-03-2021866": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1675_202027-10-2020981": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1957_202010-12-2020449": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1689_201911-09-20192403": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1754_202019-11-2020687": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1421_201916-08-2019229": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7_202106-01-2021148": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2162_201920-11-20191061": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_982_202001-10-20202605": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_898_201930-05-20191464": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_116_202019-10-202064": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1532_201926-08-201989": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1832_201915-10-20191721": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1318_202011-09-20201567": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_756_202106-04-2021177": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1020_201906-08-20192016": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_124_202119-01-20212045": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_212_202129-01-20211796": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_592_201901-05-20192217": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_261_202105-02-20211600": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_187_202022-12-20209": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_208_202025-02-2020390": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_364_202018-03-202018": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1512_201907-09-20192443": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_433_202104-03-2021892": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1074_201922-06-20191289": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_516_202108-03-2021794": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1594_201903-09-20192542": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_843_202008-09-20202990": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_168_202102-02-20213254": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_220_202025-02-2020391": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1260_201916-07-2019809": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_63_202111-01-20213403": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1127_202026-08-20201": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1226_201910-07-2019989": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1804_201903-10-20191852": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1103_201906-07-20191055": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2427_201924-12-201919": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1838_202023-11-2020631": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_938_201906-06-20191405": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1557_201907-09-20192444": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_866_202106-04-2021181": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1638_202030-10-2020916": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1383_201906-08-2019393": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1653_202021-10-20201049": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1796_202011-11-2020759": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_620_202110-03-2021731": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2130_202018-01-20212083": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1898_201919-10-20191624": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1051_201925-06-20191244": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_539_202115-03-2021679": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_26_202026-06-202081": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_161_202120-01-20212007": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_966_201909-08-2019304": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1360_201920-08-2019157": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_441_202103-03-2021925": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1407_202023-09-20201399": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1534_202008-10-20201219": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_537_202116-03-2021652": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_767_202122-03-2021495": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_94_202010-01-20201592": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_126_202018-02-2020530": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2393_201924-12-201915": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1165_201928-06-20191202": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_569_202109-04-20212537": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2032_201920-11-20191054": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1982_201901-11-20191439": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_440_202119-03-20212694": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_983_202001-10-20202606": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_184_202022-12-20206": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_790_201916-05-20191709": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1745_201924-09-20191996": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1170_201927-06-20191216": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_113_202006-02-20201028": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1066_202126-04-202111": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1786_201901-10-20191870": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_329_202117-02-20211282": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1740_201923-09-20192019": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_38_202101-02-202191": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1864_201923-10-20191547": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_34_202127-01-202198": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_52_202101-02-2021260": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_329_202013-03-202071": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_32_202030-06-202076": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_67_202122-02-202153": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1169_202027-08-20201787": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1416_201909-08-2019313": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_939_201906-06-20191406": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_27_202013-01-20201551": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2199_201928-11-2019826": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_566_202108-04-20212566": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2418_201923-12-201935": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_248_202030-01-20201163": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_581_202112-03-2021706": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1819_202023-11-2020628": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2466_201914-01-20201528": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2335_201910-12-2019586": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_592_202108-03-2021798": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_861_202105-04-2021218": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2188_201911-12-2019547": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_178_202017-03-202031": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_21_202003-01-20201774": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_28_202128-01-202195": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_621_202110-03-2021732": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1080_202017-08-202084": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_383_202029-02-2020274": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_182_202010-02-2020740": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_450_202104-03-2021893": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_134_202011-11-202030": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1103_201928-08-20191958": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1841_201901-10-20191875": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3_202005-02-202039": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_480_202102-03-2021971": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_87_202123-02-202175": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1854_201910-10-20191775": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_127_202118-01-20212078": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1276_201927-07-2019598": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_199_202104-02-20211638": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1604_201918-09-20192112": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1134_201921-06-20191311": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_928_202117-04-202129": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_815_201928-06-20192108": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_911_202107-04-2021150": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101_202024-07-202034": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_257_202005-11-202095": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1463_202029-09-20201333": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1631_201911-09-20192400": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1253_202019-11-20202134": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_96_202109-03-20216": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_20_202108-01-20212293": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2000_202011-12-2020433": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1325_202014-09-20201544": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1139_201901-07-20191175": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_77_202124-02-202141": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1609_201907-09-20192447": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_829_202008-09-20202983": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_361_202027-02-2020335": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_20_202115-01-2021173": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1179_202003-11-20202316": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_802_202029-07-2020200": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1519_202021-10-20201039": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_207_202102-04-2021115": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1677_201919-09-20192085": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1891_202023-11-2020639": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1789_201916-10-20191698": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1297_202023-11-20202086": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_329_202023-12-202023": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2373_201913-12-2019489": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1610_201906-09-20192466": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2382_201902-01-20201816": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_78_202125-02-202134": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_105_202007-02-20201000": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_913_201928-05-20191518": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1089_201924-06-20191271": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_284_202004-03-2020220": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_133_202010-11-202036": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2143_202006-01-20212380": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_295_202020-02-2020473": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_569_202109-03-2021766": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_820_202117-04-202125": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1883_201916-10-20191702": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_177_202102-02-20211704": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_952_202018-08-202070": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1044_201910-07-2019980": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_874_201921-05-20191628": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1323_202026-11-20202056": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_30_202119-01-2021292": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2359_201912-12-2019520": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_889_201921-05-20191629": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1028_201905-07-20191072": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_372_202028-02-2020303": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_830_202109-04-202187": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1313_201930-07-2019532": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1068_202017-08-202081": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1124_202019-10-20202480": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_50_202013-01-20201554": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_667_202125-03-2021397": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2381_201924-12-201913": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_471_202123-03-20212669": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_11_202031-01-20201142": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1231_201909-07-20191015": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1079_201922-06-20191290": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1956_202002-12-2020562": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1088_201922-06-20191292": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_32_202122-01-2021161": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5_202105-01-2021339": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_129_202120-01-20212005": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_93_202116-01-20213387": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1228_202004-09-20201672": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_201_202101-04-2021119": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_161_202020-01-20201376": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1431_201921-08-2019130": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_849_201922-05-20191604": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2449_201921-12-201971": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_257_202019-02-2020511": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_235_202105-02-20211597": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_660_202125-03-2021394": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_702_202122-04-202111": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1103_202015-10-20202543": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1960_202005-12-2020529": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_799_202112-04-202166": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_156_202018-01-20201398": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1706_201923-09-20192013": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_820_201929-06-20192106": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1400_201908-08-2019344": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1350_201901-08-2019489": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_99_202110-03-20212": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1654_201916-09-20192173": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1296_202023-11-20202085": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1318_201903-08-2019446": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_379_202003-03-2020248": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_436_202118-02-20211254": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1664_202023-10-20201001": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_85_202110-02-2021228": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2_202102-01-2021342": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_287_202101-03-20212933": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_552_202118-03-2021574": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_14_202111-01-2021138": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_33_202003-07-202071": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1402_202028-09-20201351": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_55_202010-02-2020733": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1223_201926-07-2019622": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_170_202102-02-20213256": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_13_202111-01-2021179": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_829_201904-06-20191415": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1978_201916-11-20191144": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1111_202017-10-20202489": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1776_201901-10-20191869": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_778_202108-04-2021119": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_590_202109-03-2021768": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_828_201904-06-20191414": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_912_201929-05-20191491": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1205_201926-09-20192834": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_963_201930-07-20192027": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2296_201905-12-2019680": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_205_202102-04-2021113": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1339_201905-08-2019423": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_668_202118-03-2021583": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_149_202024-09-202096": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_176_202004-11-202067": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2037_201914-11-20191215": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1640_202027-10-2020977": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1815_201903-10-20191853": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1469_201920-08-2019158": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_54_202101-02-2021262": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_381_202104-03-2021889": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2017_202005-01-20212405": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1580_201923-09-20192011": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1331_201928-08-201942": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_304_202024-02-2020430": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_297_202101-03-20212943": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1294_201927-07-2019599": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_944_201926-07-20192037": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1753_201925-09-20191972": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1869_201914-10-20191743": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_704_202123-03-2021456": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2313_201901-01-20201842": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1420_202015-12-20201888": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_554_202117-03-2021619": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1322_202026-11-20202055": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2325_201909-12-2019614": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_88_202007-02-2020999": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1760_201930-09-20191889": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_517_202115-03-2021678": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2398_201917-12-2019168": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4_202106-01-2021192": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_683_202122-03-2021487": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1583_201902-09-20192565": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_212_202005-10-2020131": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_662_202125-03-2021395": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_89_202104-03-202118": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_70_202111-02-2021117": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_19_202113-01-2021308": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_25_202118-01-2021114": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_13_202111-01-2021318": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1600_202020-10-20201069": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_183_202010-02-2020741": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_275_202104-02-20211642": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1280_201901-08-2019488": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2399_201917-12-2019169": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_747_202125-03-2021400": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1012_201921-06-20191302": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_339_202106-03-20212830": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1445_202022-09-20201430": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_40_202018-03-20207": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1262_201924-07-2019679": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2195_201923-11-2019937": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2132_202002-01-20212471": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2148_201927-11-2019853": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1046_201927-06-20191211": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_136_202020-01-20201373": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_543_202115-03-2021682": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_165_202102-02-20211701": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_280_202019-02-2020514": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1123_202024-08-202027": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_99_202118-01-20213385": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_14_202111-01-2021180": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1095_201903-07-20191130": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2055_202017-12-2020136": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_47_202006-01-20201722": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1411_201905-08-2019427": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_672_202119-03-2021538": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_263_201904-12-201920": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_65_202113-01-20212186": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_70_202008-01-20201659": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1202_201926-09-20192832": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1227_201922-07-2019719": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2022_201915-11-20191178": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_944_201924-06-20191250": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_147_202128-01-20211830": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_11_202028-05-2020106": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_613_202107-04-2021143": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_956_201929-05-20191495": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2264_201910-12-2019582": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1748_201925-09-20191970": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1744_201924-09-20191995": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1650_201905-09-20192488": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_805_202113-04-202152": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_51_202005-02-20201052": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_84_202014-09-202091": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_140_202016-09-2020102": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1655_201907-09-20192454": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1310_202011-09-20201564": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1057_201901-07-20191169": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_197_202008-12-202054": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1927_201918-01-20201399": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2177_201929-11-2019791": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101_202119-01-20213375": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_245_202102-02-20211707": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1571_201903-09-20192539": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_157_202127-01-20211865": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1768_202011-11-2020755": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1230_202004-09-20201673": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_34_202121-01-2021286": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1713_202011-11-2020750": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1424_202016-12-20201872": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_87_202104-03-202116": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2129_201914-11-20191220": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1108_202016-10-20202503": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_383_202115-03-20212758": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_73_202123-02-202146": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_51_202014-01-20201522": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1332_202009-09-20201614": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_55_202101-02-2021263": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_427_202013-03-202075": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_847_201905-07-20192093": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1684_201918-09-20192120": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_151_202025-09-202091": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1941_201907-11-20191306": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1376_202018-09-20201467": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1405_202022-09-20201425": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1928_201917-10-20191673": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1128_201905-09-20192877": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_230_202116-02-20213049": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2230_201903-01-20201776": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_399_202126-02-20211047": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_170_202028-10-202074": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_327_202109-02-20211497": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1570_202027-10-2020971": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_989_202003-10-20202601": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1989_201925-10-20191505": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1338_201905-08-2019422": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_264_202111-02-20211411": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_884_201922-05-20191606": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_637_202115-03-2021688": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2236_201913-01-20201559": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2304_201911-12-2019551": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1203_201926-09-20192833": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_196_202024-01-20201285": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_206_202027-01-20201254": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2194_201904-02-20201076": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_150_202023-11-202025": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_408_202020-03-202013": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2081_202001-01-20212479": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1898_202024-11-2020619": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2110_202004-01-20212442": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_278_202118-02-20211244": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_441_202012-03-2020104": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1114_201901-07-20191171": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1131_201902-07-20191158": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2239_201910-12-2019574": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1565_202013-10-20201175": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_132_202010-11-202035": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1772_202010-11-2020768": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1589_201928-08-201950": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_240_202109-02-20211488": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_76_202112-01-20213397": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1146_202026-08-20203": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_159_202009-09-2020184": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_255_202116-04-202135": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2057_201911-11-20191270": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1214_202001-09-20201730": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1993_202017-12-2020131": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_126_202004-11-202047": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_975_202020-07-2020305": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_458_202007-03-2020140": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1630_202019-10-20201088": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_153_202030-09-202085": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1154_202031-08-20201736": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2041_201905-11-20191345": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_51_202105-02-2021134": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_779_201903-05-20191900": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1368_201913-08-2019281": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2258_201930-11-2019775": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1125_202019-10-20202481": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1545_202006-10-20201261": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1104_202020-08-202043": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_225_202108-02-20211533": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_809_201915-05-20191729": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4_202004-01-20201748": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_245_202003-11-2020104": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1683_201909-09-20192424": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_620_202024-07-2020258": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_77_202102-02-2021895": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_240_202118-02-2021664": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101035_201917-10-2019205": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_202_202104-02-2021853": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2000124_201921-10-2019192": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_265_202003-11-20203": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_886_202022-09-2020782": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_326_202115-02-2021705": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101157_201901-11-2019143": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_71_202115-02-2021700": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1289_202002-12-2020267": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_210001_201922-05-2019451": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_43_202003-02-2020301": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_96_202102-02-2021903": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101144_201906-11-2019123": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_617_202125-03-2021191": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100801_201922-08-201960": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_858_202016-09-2020840": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_422_202103-03-2021504": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1183_202020-11-2020326": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210047_201910-01-2020408": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_289_202016-03-202038": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210025_201915-10-2019239": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_650_202028-07-2020236": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_665_202106-04-2021103": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210031_201902-11-2019134": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_217_202104-02-2021854": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_869_202011-09-2020887": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_195_202130-01-2021949": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_362_202119-02-2021649": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_15_202104-01-20211169": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_586_202023-07-2020269": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_307_202108-02-2021795": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_497_202122-03-2021231": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_300032_201910-07-2019312": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_187_202025-02-2020158": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_210010_201922-07-2019245": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_620_202113-04-202149": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_220_202119-02-2021640": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101306_201907-01-2020425": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100921_201918-09-2019372": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210023_201930-09-2019290": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101121_201901-11-2019139": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_873_202011-09-2020888": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_160_202025-02-2020156": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_210008_201922-07-2019244": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_477_202106-03-2021460": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_617_202027-07-2020243": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210013_201919-08-2019102": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_774_202001-09-2020999": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101303_201904-01-2020434": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_741_202021-08-202037": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1492_202007-01-20211146": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_485_202102-03-2021526": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_454_202125-02-2021567": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_534_202102-04-2021137": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101330_201903-01-2020440": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1423_202009-12-2020194": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1600006_201927-09-2019296": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_561_202008-07-2020376": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_916_202011-09-2020894": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_92_202005-02-2020274": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2000145_201918-11-201993": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000005_201928-05-2019421": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_175_202029-02-2020114": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_525_202117-03-2021307": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_384_202104-03-2021495": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_687_202116-04-202142": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_81_202129-01-2021962": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_86_202020-02-2020175": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101_202028-02-2020120": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100957_201918-09-2019379": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1302_202027-11-2020280": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_300051_201927-05-2019428": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_503_202115-03-2021333": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_479_202103-03-2021508": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_551_202102-04-2021139": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210042_201914-01-2020401": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_444_202117-03-2021302": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_210040_201928-11-201954": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_182_202102-02-2021909": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_342_202117-02-2021686": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101299_201903-01-2020437": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101329_201903-01-2020439": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_434_202126-02-2021554": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_460_202123-03-2021212": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_779_201907-08-2019159": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_593_202017-07-2020307": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_144_202127-01-2021978": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101266_201902-12-201941": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_445_202129-04-20211": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_893_202011-09-2020890": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1379_202011-12-2020161": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100915_201918-09-2019368": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101038_201917-10-2019208": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_387_202117-02-2021694": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_528_202010-07-2020356": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_355_202119-02-2021646": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_377_202122-02-2021618": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_49_202025-02-2020150": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_782_202028-08-20201023": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100826_201926-08-201938": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_638_202013-08-2020110": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101048_201905-10-2019261": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_147_202014-07-202082": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3004_201926-11-2019723": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_773_202122-03-20211681": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1983_202006-11-2020452": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_403_202104-03-2021591": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2554_201922-11-2019790": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_428_202105-03-2021566": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2725_201905-11-20191086": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1383_202018-08-202098": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_77_202101-03-2021142": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2379_201916-10-20191357": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2351_201923-09-20191720": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1466_202014-09-20201087": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_346_202011-11-2020118": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1069_202008-07-2020435": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_174_202012-06-2020309": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2754_201922-10-20191264": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_206_202004-07-2020217": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_157_202102-02-20211088": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_387_202104-03-2021587": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_17_202102-01-20212470": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_463_202102-03-2021644": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3135_201903-12-2019604": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_286_202108-02-20212112": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2117_201902-09-20192243": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3165_201909-12-2019491": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1239_202029-07-2020233": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2366_201905-10-20191505": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2343_201904-10-20191534": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_434_202105-03-2021567": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1421_202013-08-2020144": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2528_201905-10-20191509": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1240_202030-07-2020221": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_203_202111-02-2021908": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2644_201917-10-20191341": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2212_201903-09-20192217": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_257_202019-08-202038": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_107_202020-03-20201": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1499_202019-09-2020982": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_16_202115-01-20211361": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2524_201904-10-20191546": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_379_202023-12-20207": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_806_202020-05-2020914": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_347_202011-11-2020119": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1269_202006-08-20201122": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_591_201926-11-201935": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_466_202108-03-2021531": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2712_201918-10-20191324": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_553_202115-03-2021457": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1390_202013-08-2020139": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_152_202125-01-20212262": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_324_202122-02-2021773": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_70_202118-01-20212323": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_548_202102-03-20211910": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_745_202109-04-202150": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_312_202007-10-2020229": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_192_202104-02-20211039": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1136_202001-07-2020573": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_760_202018-05-2020943": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1917_202019-10-2020672": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_346_202118-02-2021826": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_222_202105-03-2021563": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2575_201915-10-20191394": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_138_202125-01-20211226": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_738_202029-05-2020818": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_344_202125-02-2021700": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2564_201924-10-20191194": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2908_201913-11-2019980": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1937_202020-11-20201380": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1566_202004-09-20201161": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_90_202006-03-202017": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_32_202101-02-2021271": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_151_202125-01-20212261": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_431_201913-09-2019256": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2511_201903-10-20191569": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_615_202101-04-2021161": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_343_202122-02-2021775": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_153_202130-01-20211126": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_548_201911-11-201973": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_351_202122-02-2021777": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2643_201914-10-20191437": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5_202102-01-2021378": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1209_202014-07-2020359": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3232_201910-12-2019484": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_587_202116-03-2021434": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_473_202116-03-2021417": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_300_202024-09-2020283": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_386_202116-03-2021416": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2300_202005-01-20211530": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2669_201924-10-20191197": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2098_202003-12-2020198": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_224_202015-07-2020153": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_487_202126-02-20211940": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2651_201915-10-20191403": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2518_201910-10-20191471": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_399_202118-02-20212026": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2244_201916-10-20191355": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_159_202127-01-20211201": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1010_202019-06-2020650": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2332_201920-09-20191769": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2081_202012-11-2020383": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_499_202126-02-20211942": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3140_201909-12-2019490": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1835_201920-09-20191758": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_297_202025-09-2020279": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2341_202019-01-20211309": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_357_202018-11-2020101": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_114_202121-01-20212286": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_537_202109-03-2021514": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_810_202020-05-2020916": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2254_202004-01-20211557": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3176_201906-12-2019521": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_395_202108-03-2021523": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_674_202022-05-2020875": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_39_202108-01-20212403": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_780_202123-03-20211659": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_46_202108-02-2021250": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1566_202021-09-20201815": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_367_202005-12-202055": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_985_202012-06-2020671": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2708_201925-10-20191176": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_71_202110-03-202178": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3263_201919-12-201963": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2248_202008-01-20211450": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1065_202010-07-2020392": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2247_202007-01-20211472": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_727_202015-05-2020963": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1493_202003-09-20201177": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_601_202124-03-2021229": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1949_202023-10-2020602": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2334_202005-01-20211535": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2529_201931-10-20191140": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1825_201930-07-2019511": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_598_202119-03-2021325": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3300_201918-12-201997": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_258_202020-08-202027": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2519_201904-10-20191545": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_183_202103-02-20211061": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2311_201912-09-20192031": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_329_202021-10-2020180": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1201_202022-07-2020274": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1912_202020-10-2020652": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_432_202126-02-2021685": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2199_202004-12-2020183": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_502_201915-10-2019173": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_126_202030-06-2020115": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1646_202023-09-2020938": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_841_202026-05-2020873": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_551_201913-11-201968": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_62_202118-02-2021185": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2118_201906-09-20192128": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_96_202119-03-202138": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1066_202010-07-2020393": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_253_202021-09-2020149": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1463_202025-08-202025": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2459_201925-10-20191168": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2309_201925-09-20191676": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_287_202122-02-2021769": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_181_202015-06-2020307": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_113_202025-06-2020126": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_29_202129-01-2021284": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_269_202115-02-2021871": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_104_202121-01-20211273": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2373_201918-09-20191828": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2826_201901-11-20191129": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_378_202101-03-2021659": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1864_201901-08-2019457": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_685_202126-03-2021194": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_63_202116-01-20212336": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1777_202013-10-2020746": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_364_202027-11-202065": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_400_201904-10-2019205": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_130_202129-01-20211148": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2706_201922-11-2019791": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1939_202019-10-2020675": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2862_201906-11-20191061": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_469_202124-03-2021226": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2397_201919-09-20191799": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_455_202108-03-2021529": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2630_201922-10-20191258": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1420_202018-08-2020102": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1407_202024-08-202034": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_785_202026-05-2020871": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_58_202115-02-2021198": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_85_202120-01-20211287": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_202_202002-07-2020236": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2027_201919-08-2019203": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_415_202125-02-2021708": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1818_202020-10-2020644": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2486_201925-09-20191686": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_181_202110-02-2021934": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_891_202015-06-2020664": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_205_202007-07-2020199": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2069_201926-08-201987": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_531_202116-03-2021427": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_51_202024-01-2020120": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1974_201913-08-2019280": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1724_201931-07-2019470": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_677_202125-03-2021213": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_705_202125-03-2021216": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2246_201912-09-20192028": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_970_202008-06-2020703": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2251_201905-09-20192155": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1042_202015-06-2020670": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_617_202119-03-2021329": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_118_202026-06-2020125": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1894_202019-10-2020669": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2412_201920-09-20191773": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3290_201918-12-201996": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_692_202101-04-2021165": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2288_202002-01-20211569": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2136_201927-08-201963": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_21_202112-01-20211396": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1736_202025-09-2020915": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_676_202126-03-2021193": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_189_202022-06-2020270": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1028_202002-07-2020546": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_277_202001-09-2020341": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_456_201901-10-2019223": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1149_202007-07-2020467": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_671_202029-05-2020814": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3073_201918-12-201985": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2108_202003-12-2020199": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1876_202020-10-2020649": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1933_202019-11-20201391": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_375_202101-03-2021656": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_361_202123-02-2021748": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1338_202018-08-20201060": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_603_201917-12-20195": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1647_202021-09-2020968": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_271_202110-02-2021944": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3010_201928-11-2019673": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1040_202015-06-2020668": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2230_201924-10-20191191": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2180_202003-12-2020206": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_368_202011-12-202046": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_125_202122-01-20212272": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_376_202101-03-2021657": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2321_202007-01-20211475": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_215_202027-08-2020196": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1661_202022-09-2020950": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1350_202030-07-2020230": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_934_202011-06-2020674": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3075_201927-11-2019701": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_134_202028-05-2020325": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_41_202111-02-2021216": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3183_201906-12-2019526": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1822_201930-07-2019508": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_906_202029-05-2020823": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_656_202027-05-2020855": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2713_201911-11-2019996": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2159_201929-08-201915": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_274_202027-08-2020356": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2919_201913-11-2019982": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_681_202101-04-2021164": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_448_202122-02-20211972": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_86_202124-02-2021281": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_299_202029-09-2020270": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1405_202028-08-20201982": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_360_202023-11-202084": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_98_202125-01-20211220": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_945_202001-06-2020789": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1763_202008-10-2020785": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_270_202119-02-2021804": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_805_202021-05-2020892": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_373_202017-12-202020": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2906_201913-11-2019978": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1667_202008-10-20201677": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_133_202120-01-20211290": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_40_202119-01-20211300": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1826_201930-07-2019512": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_568_202104-03-20211878": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1883_201902-08-2019420": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_83_202004-03-202021": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_340_202007-11-2020137": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_216_202027-08-2020197": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1924_202007-01-20211470": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_238_202030-07-202081": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1389_202013-08-2020138": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_589_201926-11-201933": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_394_201929-08-20197": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_276_202001-09-2020340": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1993_201916-08-2019240": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_515_202115-03-2021453": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_533_202125-03-2021209": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1976_201930-08-20192795": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1351_202019-08-20201058": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2375_201918-09-20191829": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2514_201905-10-20191508": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1476_202001-09-20201207": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1401_202026-08-20202": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1923_201909-08-2019301": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_602_202120-03-2021293": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1458_202005-09-20201930": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_52_202024-02-202036": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2615_201915-10-20191400": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_668_202126-03-2021191": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2940_201922-11-2019800": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1320_202029-07-2020243": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_39_202101-03-2021141": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_239_202031-07-202078": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1886_202011-11-20201423": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_789_202124-03-20211652": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_245_202110-02-2021939": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_378_202023-12-20206": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2509_201931-10-20191139": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2198_201906-09-20192133": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_251_202110-02-2021941": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2481_201930-09-20191608": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2326_202008-01-20211456": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2342_202019-01-20211310": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__2035_201911-07-20191011": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__1341_201913-05-20191770": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1200_202006-03-2020228": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2459_202029-09-20201369": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__2387_201906-09-20192643": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1652_202017-08-2020268": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3667_202025-11-2020521": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1453_202001-06-2020526": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__1052_201902-05-20191934": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1441_202001-06-2020525": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__1715_201915-06-20191278": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3746_202005-12-2020355": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2001_202026-08-202019": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__1959_201917-07-2019843": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__3917_201911-12-2019381": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3505_202010-11-2020738": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__1429_201924-05-20191573": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2402_202011-09-20201745": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2057_202014-09-20201677": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__1648_201907-06-20191351": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2170_202001-09-20201932": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1514_202024-08-202068": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3524_202012-11-2020686": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1427_202126-03-2021280": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1846_202018-08-2020232": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2395_202018-09-20201586": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__1374_201908-05-20191827": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2737_202029-09-20201385": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__2549_201930-08-20192876": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__2038_201914-08-2019265": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1958_202024-08-2020113": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2834_202001-10-20201334": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1367_202031-07-2020430": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__1671_201907-06-20191355": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2674_202029-09-20201377": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__3616_201921-11-2019948": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3670_202024-11-2020548": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1812_202013-08-2020317": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3775_202007-12-2020333": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__3974_201930-11-2019696": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1731_202010-08-2020374": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1511_202112-04-202143": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1516_202006-08-2020397": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2849_202001-10-20201337": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1739_202024-08-202081": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8_202028-05-2020604": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__3334_201916-10-20191702": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3229_202023-10-2020957": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1719_202013-08-2020307": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2893_202013-10-20201123": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__2967_201924-09-20192180": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2557_202018-09-20201601": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2031_202024-08-2020132": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2425_202029-09-20201368": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__1082_201901-05-20191958": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2093_202001-09-20201928": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__3498_201922-11-2019920": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__1459_201913-05-20191775": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2441_202017-09-20201622": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2243_202004-09-20201817": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__3683_201918-11-20191053": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__1211_201916-05-20191704": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1372_202126-03-2021277": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1182_202126-03-2021260": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__1386_201906-05-20191876": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__1768_201926-06-20191171": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__2680_201924-09-20192168": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1400_202125-03-2021312": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__1392_201913-05-20191772": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__2789_201907-09-20192622": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__2293_201907-08-2019353": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__2938_201911-10-20191792": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1827_202019-08-2020205": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1547_202007-08-2020383": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1458_202107-04-202195": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1366_202125-03-2021311": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__2520_201906-09-20192647": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__1359_201915-05-20191723": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_12_202030-05-2020584": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2414_202001-10-20201317": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3675_202026-11-2020503": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1207_202124-03-2021333": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1274_202122-03-2021418": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2935_202008-10-20201214": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1204_202106-04-2021118": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__3135_201916-10-20191698": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2036_202026-08-202021": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3464_202023-11-2020571": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3692_202027-11-2020479": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3519_202002-12-2020406": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1289_202123-03-2021377": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3221_202021-10-20201009": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__2544_201907-09-20192614": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2300_202007-09-20201775": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__2745_201911-09-20192572": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2263_202011-09-20201718": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__1227_201901-05-20191963": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3391_202023-11-2020564": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3419_202023-11-2020569": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__2966_201926-09-20192113": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__2986_201913-11-20191188": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2527_202008-10-20201199": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__2125_201923-07-2019712": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3208_202022-10-2020982": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__2782_201924-09-20192171": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2838_202007-10-20201229": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1468_202109-04-202157": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2824_202030-09-20201363": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3526_202027-11-2020460": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__1587_201901-07-20191131": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__1530_201924-05-20191578": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__1389_201913-05-20191771": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3176_202014-10-20201109": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3641_202002-12-2020416": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3700_202025-11-2020523": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1130_202125-03-2021293": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2200_202003-09-20201855": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3413_202006-11-2020807": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__2899_201917-09-20192407": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__1549_201927-05-20191525": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__1893_201908-07-20191045": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3309_202029-10-2020915": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__2041_201923-07-2019709": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2440_202017-09-20201621": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__2808_201921-09-20192227": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2912_202009-10-20201179": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1170_202006-03-2020224": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1302_202001-06-2020522": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2547_202024-09-20201464": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__2119_201924-07-2019671": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__2215_201914-08-2019266": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__2080_201924-07-2019664": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1322_202118-03-2021556": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2683_202001-10-20201325": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2393_202016-09-20201654": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__3993_201902-12-2019663": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2792_202006-10-20201255": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__3290_201918-11-20191042": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2895_202018-12-2020136": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3119_202016-10-20201067": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1546_202007-08-2020382": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__3045_201926-09-20192119": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1794_202013-08-2020313": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__1949_201910-07-20191022": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2363_202011-09-20201736": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__3196_201911-10-20191799": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_847_202003-03-2020337": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__2663_201902-09-20192803": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2891_202013-10-20201121": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__2948_201918-09-20192361": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__1438_201920-05-20191653": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__3573_201925-11-2019845": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2638_202024-09-20201478": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2730_202030-09-20201358": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1137_202006-08-2020393": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__1495_201924-05-20191574": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3487_202026-11-2020491": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3089_202019-10-20201037": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__3708_201920-11-2019972": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2132_202014-09-20201679": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__2269_201925-07-2019638": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__3134_201916-10-20191697": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3848_202014-12-2020240": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2340_202016-09-20201648": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2725_202024-09-20201489": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__1516_201924-05-20191576": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3681_202002-12-2020418": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3715_202017-12-2020167": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__3342_201918-10-20191653": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2189_202003-09-20201853": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2767_202007-10-20201222": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_866_202117-03-2021586": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__2396_201903-09-20192752": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__1595_201907-06-20191350": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__3413_201931-10-20191430": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__2607_201907-09-20192616": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3682_202005-12-2020350": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__2881_201919-09-20192306": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__4341_201920-12-201973": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__3973_201930-11-2019695": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__2812_201919-09-20192302": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2201_202003-09-20201856": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_897_202004-03-2020294": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2255_202001-09-20201941": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3540_202021-11-2020606": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__4241_201916-12-2019222": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1150_202007-03-2020185": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2276_202003-09-20201863": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3541_202012-11-2020689": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1260_202119-03-2021502": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3033_202020-10-20201016": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2996_202013-10-20201132": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2267_202003-09-20201861": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__2572_201926-08-201988": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__3399_201919-11-2019999": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1568_202004-08-2020422": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__2259_201905-08-2019409": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__2281_201912-09-20192524": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3790_202003-12-2020395": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__2446_201916-08-2019253": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2898_202012-10-20201152": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2967_202012-10-20201159": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__3252_201925-10-20191497": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__2807_201904-10-20191896": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1497_202019-08-2020192": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2862_202008-10-20201209": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3310_202006-11-2020797": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__2007_201915-07-2019898": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2803_202012-10-20201148": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__2756_201919-09-20192296": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__4271_201917-12-2019178": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_889_202004-03-2020292": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1639_202016-09-20201635": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3801_202014-12-2020234": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3582_202024-11-2020536": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__2773_201911-09-20192574": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2206_202002-09-20201894": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1415_202105-04-2021158": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1954_202024-08-2020110": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_986_202003-06-2020497": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2882_202001-10-20201341": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1187_202006-03-2020226": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__2936_201918-09-20192360": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2207_202002-09-20201895": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3128_202020-10-20201023": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3606_202021-11-2020614": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3538_202024-11-2020534": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__4320_201919-12-2019105": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2988_202009-10-20201186": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3660_202027-11-2020475": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__2631_201918-09-20192344": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2257_202002-09-20201904": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2229_202003-09-20201858": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3486_202009-11-2020777": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1905_202026-08-202012": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__2217_201931-07-2019531": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2478_202018-09-20201594": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__1668_201920-06-20191202": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2479_202021-09-20201545": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2162_202022-09-20201495": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__2626_201924-09-20192167": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1275_202005-09-20201790": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__645_201925-05-20191544": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2033_202002-09-20201875": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2985_202013-10-20201128": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3289_202028-10-2020925": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__3428_201916-11-20191079": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3143_202022-10-2020979": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__3459_201915-11-20191122": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__2995_201921-09-20192235": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1862_202025-08-202045": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__4297_201918-12-2019139": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__2742_201904-09-20192722": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2759_202029-09-20201387": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__3233_201922-11-2019917": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1989_202027-08-20202015": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__2905_201924-09-20192179": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__3997_201909-12-2019470": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2690_202030-09-20201354": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2260_202011-09-20201717": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1888_202017-08-2020290": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3160_202027-10-2020938": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__1479_201918-05-20191670": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2786_202007-10-20201223": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2486_202018-09-20201595": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__3951_201916-12-2019211": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__2022_201917-07-2019849": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2526_202008-10-20201198": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__2020_201916-07-2019875": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3552_202024-11-2020535": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2042_202026-08-202022": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__3671_201902-12-2019642": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3638_202011-12-2020277": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2661_202029-09-20201372": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__3366_201913-11-20191194": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2077_202024-09-20201436": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__2965_201914-10-20191763": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1745_202024-08-202082": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2760_202022-10-2020968": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__1986_201916-07-2019873": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__3060_201930-09-20192025": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__4180_201920-12-201967": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3987_202023-12-202036": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3102_202021-10-2020998": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__1882_201910-07-20191021": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__3075_201918-10-20191645": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1826_202019-08-2020204": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__1856_201901-07-20191135": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1571_202017-08-2020260": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1326_202124-03-2021341": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__1869_201925-06-20191183": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__3005_201911-10-20191794": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__3054_201910-10-20191830": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__2577_201929-08-201929": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__1807_201929-06-20191148": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__1733_201917-06-20191261": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3962_202019-12-2020120": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3022_202015-10-20201083": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__3919_201910-12-2019427": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2722_202029-09-20201380": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3537_202018-11-2020651": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3653_202001-12-2020441": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3656_202026-11-2020501": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__3014_201923-09-20192205": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3469_202023-11-2020572": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__4277_201923-12-201936": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1019_202117-03-2021593": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3365_202009-11-2020756": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3689_202001-12-2020442": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__3367_201914-11-20191154": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__2977_201920-09-20192273": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1742_202017-08-2020275": "DENIED", + "Bail Appl__2694_201927-09-20192065": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2901_202009-10-20201177": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2351_202007-09-20201779": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2205_202003-09-20201857": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1990_202027-08-20202016": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__1863_201926-06-20191174": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1524_202127-04-202117": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1503_202004-06-2020494": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2161_202002-09-20201884": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1081_202131-03-2021227": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2948_202012-10-20201156": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2157_202002-09-20201883": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2382_202011-09-20201739": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1993_202020-08-2020176": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appl__2070_201924-07-2019663": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3360_202009-11-2020755": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2220_202024-09-20201439": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4036_202022-12-202065": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2128_202001-09-20201930": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3860_202005-12-2020362": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3172_202017-10-20201052": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2183_202001-09-20201934": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3674_202007-12-2020330": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1320_202017-03-2020101": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1690_202010-08-2020369": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1014_202004-03-2020305": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_50014_202028-01-2020775": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_99_202127-01-20211187": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_482_202106-04-2021154": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_500109_201913-11-2019826": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_543_202003-07-2020111": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_748_201916-11-2019734": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_319_202014-05-2020332": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1176_202004-01-20211452": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_405_202112-04-202154": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_994_202005-11-2020430": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_310_202126-02-2021668": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_424_201912-06-20191071": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5000175_201916-11-2019742": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1124_202019-12-202052": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_172_202005-03-2020125": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_983_202007-01-20211390": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_431_202107-04-2021134": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_219_202025-02-2020270": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1000046_201925-07-2019441": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_219_202126-02-2021659": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_200185_201905-12-2019455": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7_202007-01-2020939": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_428_202117-04-202116": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_369_202021-05-2020290": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_357_201914-05-20191343": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_473_202018-06-2020196": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1198_202011-01-20211362": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2000152_201916-11-2019740": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_409_202124-03-2021269": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_46_202004-02-2020667": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_817_202008-10-2020732": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_879_202012-10-2020709": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_524_201930-07-2019355": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100140_201903-01-2020970": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1083_202007-12-2020230": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7_202120-01-20211241": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_848_202009-10-2020718": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_182_202003-03-2020171": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_200147_201906-11-2019909": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_200158_201926-11-2019567": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_398_201930-05-20191136": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_495_201920-07-2019518": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_662_202025-08-202016": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_366_202123-03-2021289": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_50007_202028-01-2020770": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_307_202021-03-20206": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5000010_202029-10-2020547": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1800050_201925-07-2019445": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1900017_201921-05-20191278": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_278_202016-05-2020314": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_405_201901-06-20191116": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_88_202106-02-2021956": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_541_202017-08-202031": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_406_202117-03-2021372": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_96_202005-03-2020123": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_564_201922-08-2019103": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_252_202119-02-2021806": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_548_202004-08-202063": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_863_202012-10-2020702": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_451_202018-06-2020191": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_812_201919-12-201978": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_190_202024-02-2020294": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_459_202109-04-202183": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_10005_202020-01-2020839": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_877_202012-10-2020707": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1064_202005-12-2020243": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_307_202104-03-2021536": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5000170_201907-11-2019879": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5000006_202029-01-2020752": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_337_201903-05-20191459": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1041_202004-12-2020259": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_200070_201915-07-2019578": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100001_202014-01-2020889": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_25_202017-01-2020867": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1800060_201920-08-2019136": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1186_202005-01-20211432": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1000_202011-11-2020391": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_71_202005-02-2020659": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_115_202102-02-20211069": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_385_202008-06-2020238": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_17_202102-02-20211066": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1145_202005-02-2021986": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1060_202024-11-2020332": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_279_202016-05-2020315": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_847_202009-10-2020717": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_200203_201903-01-2020972": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_50015_202029-01-2020747": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1900025_201922-06-20191014": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_331_201903-05-20191458": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1000025_201922-06-20191010": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_318_202109-03-2021462": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_453_202131-03-2021219": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_817_201923-12-201926": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_766_201922-11-2019612": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_509_202109-04-202187": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2000155_201925-11-2019584": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_776_202014-10-2020665": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_200149_201920-11-2019658": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_480_201918-07-2019544": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_737_201907-11-2019870": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_52_202022-01-2020821": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_57_202031-01-2020723": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4_202008-01-2020920": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_536_202012-08-202036": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_972_202003-11-2020464": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_473_202107-04-2021138": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_874_202012-10-2020706": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_995_202005-11-2020431": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_326_202110-03-2021432": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_521_202003-07-2020109": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_20022_202012-02-2020402": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_50008_202028-01-2020771": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_274_202125-02-2021695": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_535_202021-07-202099": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_204_202004-03-2020149": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5000155_201912-12-2019360": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_272_202123-02-2021741": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_767_202016-10-2020636": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_200195_201912-12-2019355": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_960_202004-11-2020444": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_380_202012-06-2020217": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_945_202030-10-2020544": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1900062_201916-08-2019181": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3_202117-03-2021356": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_78_202014-02-2020377": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5000173_201913-11-2019831": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1800084_201913-11-2019827": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_418_202004-06-2020253": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_394_201928-05-20191174": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_263_202125-02-2021692": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1193_202006-01-20211415": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_20067_201916-07-2019564": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_109_202122-02-2021758": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_401_202119-03-2021330": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_24_202014-01-2020886": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_235_202115-02-2021852": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_419_202015-06-2020210": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_475_201905-07-2019891": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_97_202120-01-20211247": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_969_202003-11-2020463": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_160_202019-02-2020330": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1079_202027-11-2020311": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2000134_201919-11-2019689": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_556_202024-07-202085": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1900088_201927-08-201964": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1090_202017-12-202084": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_695_201924-10-20191021": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_112_202129-01-20211132": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_851_202012-10-2020697": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1800094_201902-12-2019494": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_335_202019-05-2020297": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_415_202126-03-2021236": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1017_202024-11-2020326": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_20_202130-01-20211113": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_207_202004-03-2020150": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_211_202120-02-2021777": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1800056_201930-07-2019362": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_109_202013-02-2020390": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_91_202112-02-2021861": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_20087_201902-08-2019299": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_484_202029-06-2020133": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1150_202024-12-20208": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_417_201918-06-20191048": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_277_202010-11-2020399": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_200167_201902-12-2019491": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_110_202128-01-20211151": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1800051_201931-07-2019340": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1900050_201911-07-2019841": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_371_202028-05-2020277": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_434_201918-06-20191050": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_325_202009-02-2021926": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_189_202013-03-202052": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_195_202016-06-2020202": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_200209_201921-12-201954": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1000030_201922-06-20191011": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_595_202018-08-202026": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_457_201922-06-20191006": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_380_201921-05-20191274": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_607_202012-08-202040": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_161_202109-02-2021918": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_370_202119-03-2021328": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_480_202106-04-2021153": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_198_202116-02-2021836": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100115_201920-11-2019655": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_889_202015-10-2020648": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_336_202015-05-2020325": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1038_202001-12-2020286": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_931_202019-10-2020616": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_131_202006-02-2020656": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_905_202015-10-2020657": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1000015_201921-06-20191032": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_87_202031-01-2020728": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1900029_201929-05-20191157": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1900046_201901-07-2019949": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5000119_201915-11-2019766": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_231_202029-02-2020196": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1014_202010-11-2020402": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_364_202021-05-2020287": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_248_202018-03-202023": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1026_202030-11-2020298": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_926_202002-11-2020479": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_403_201901-07-2019943": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1194_202006-01-20211416": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_434_202131-03-2021217": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_105_202125-01-20211199": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_41_202028-01-2020766": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_522_201930-07-2019354": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_455_202022-06-2020175": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1800001_202008-01-2020925": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_200108_201928-08-201940": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_441_201927-06-2019965": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1800076_201912-11-2019849": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1029_202012-11-2020379": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1000019_201910-06-20191085": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1900096_201906-08-2019250": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_482_202029-06-2020132": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1001_202006-11-2020419": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_387_202118-03-2021347": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_967_202003-11-2020461": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_838_202019-10-2020611": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_892_202014-10-2020675": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_264_202119-02-2021807": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_539_202021-07-2020101": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_237_202126-02-2021660": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1146_202022-12-202031": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_117_202105-02-2021982": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_519_202117-04-202121": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_245_202017-03-202038": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1900085_201902-08-2019305": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1000132_201918-12-2019101": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_200120_201925-10-2019998": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_29_202113-01-20211335": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1022_202011-11-2020393": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_200063_201921-06-20191031": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1028_202030-11-2020300": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_500101_201931-10-2019970": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1800024_201921-06-20191035": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_221_202123-02-2021734": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500108_201905-11-2019936": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_453_201925-06-2019986": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_203_202122-02-2021763": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_505_202117-04-202119": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_20078_201915-07-2019577": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_419_201904-06-20191098": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_43_202118-01-20211299": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_190001_201918-12-2019100": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_406_201901-06-20191117": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_84_202024-02-2020285": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1000040_201909-07-2019860": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_180056_201906-08-2019244": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1000063_201902-08-2019302": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_560_202007-08-202044": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_32_202006-02-2020650": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_463_201927-06-2019968": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1000137_201919-12-201981": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_15_202006-01-2020956": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_377_202117-03-2021366": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_323_202108-03-2021471": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1800037_201924-07-2019472": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_254_202101-03-2021613": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_31_202119-01-20211270": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_388_202011-06-2020222": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_176_202017-02-2020360": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_269_202125-02-2021693": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_20011_202029-01-2020745": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1900018_201906-05-20191419": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_84_202101-02-20211099": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_146_202013-02-2020400": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_376_201918-05-20191295": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_468_202018-06-2020193": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1000092_201908-05-20191397": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_253_202101-03-2021612": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_304_202014-05-2020330": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100122_201922-11-2019615": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_94_202004-02-2020671": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_367_202029-05-2020272": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_257_202006-03-2020102": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_813_201919-12-201979": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_153_202129-01-20211136": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5000171_201931-10-2019973": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_350_202108-03-2021477": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_250_202005-03-2020128": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100_202022-02-2021757": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_993_202006-11-2020416": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_317_202013-05-2020336": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1099_202017-12-202086": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1900097_201906-08-2019251": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_235_202017-03-202037": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1125_202021-12-202044": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1112_202018-12-202063": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1800049_201903-08-2019283": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_107_202015-02-2020365": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1900078_201924-07-2019476": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_908_202020-10-2020598": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_121_202011-02-2020413": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1800034_201928-05-20191175": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1900047_201904-07-2019909": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_885_202014-10-2020673": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_42_202104-02-20211022": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1231_202022-12-202021": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_504_202017-06-2020913": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_232_202006-03-202067": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_186_202122-02-20211283": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_769_202004-09-2020872": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_779_202005-09-2020849": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_595_201922-07-20192082": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1205_201931-08-20192003": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_498_202018-06-2020908": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1287_201909-09-20191864": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_275_202013-05-20201100": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1342_201919-09-20191561": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_737_201928-11-20192681": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_938_201901-08-2019314": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_51_201904-06-20193752": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_623_202031-07-2020596": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1842_201930-11-2019532": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_540_202025-06-2020871": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_530_202025-06-2020868": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_862_201909-07-2019913": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_15_202103-02-2021849": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1248_201905-09-20191923": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_596_201923-07-20192069": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_49_202029-01-2020656": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_269_202123-03-2021263": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_760_201918-12-20192343": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1444_201928-09-20191378": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_127_202117-02-2021666": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1252_201905-09-20191927": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_95_202017-01-2020843": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_55_202115-01-20211563": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_52_202022-01-2020766": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_544_201901-05-20191599": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_160_202027-01-2020692": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1073_202023-10-2020423": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1063_202028-10-2020395": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_202_202024-02-2020234": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1565_201918-10-20191126": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_533_202004-07-2020842": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_356_202031-07-20201454": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1569_201922-10-20191061": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_148_202015-02-2020328": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1743_201918-11-2019731": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1572_201924-10-20191015": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_291_202115-03-2021425": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_285_202118-03-20211161": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_10_202004-02-2020587": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_169_202117-02-2021674": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_107_202117-02-2021664": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_722_201911-06-20191175": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_241_202104-03-2021490": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_129_202117-02-2021667": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_759_201921-06-20191132": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1193_201907-09-20191876": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_96_202014-05-20202038": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1094_201903-09-20191971": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_234_202104-03-20211224": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1419_201926-09-20191415": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_681_201906-06-20191229": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_121_202125-02-2021582": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_653_201921-08-20191685": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1604_201903-01-20201014": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_681_202007-08-2020550": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_739_201910-07-2019895": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_24_202013-01-20201701": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_11_202021-01-20202193": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_111_202129-01-2021899": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_55_202024-02-2020227": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1391_201924-09-20191469": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_698_202012-08-2020469": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_844_202011-09-2020772": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1393_201924-09-20191471": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1257_202025-02-2021590": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1612_201923-10-20191036": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_24_202111-01-20211041": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_146_202006-03-202062": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_138_202023-01-2020741": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_659_201926-08-20191658": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_95_202104-02-2021846": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_37_202006-01-2020978": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_408_202019-08-20201191": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1951_201920-12-201933": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1801_201903-12-2019480": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1337_202021-01-2021951": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1195_202010-12-2020141": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1773_201927-11-2019580": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_54_202008-01-2020946": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1884_201907-12-2019389": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_348_202122-03-2021289": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_400_202030-05-20201001": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_553_201918-05-20191442": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_206_202123-02-2021615": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_608_201926-07-20192018": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_358_202124-03-2021246": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1553_201917-10-20191152": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_929_201919-07-2019458": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_956_201919-10-20191096": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_871_202023-09-2020695": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_541_201928-06-20192698": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_139_202023-01-2020742": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_34_202006-01-2020976": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_40_202027-01-20201463": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_647_201919-08-20191746": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_189_202125-02-2021585": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1032_202013-10-2020532": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_707_202018-08-2020295": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1918_201912-12-2019327": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_10_202021-01-20202192": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1566_201918-10-20191127": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1976_201923-12-20196": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101_202013-02-2020352": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_474_202112-04-202166": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_951_202029-10-2020379": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1489_201917-10-20191146": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_987_202005-10-2020594": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1045_201907-09-20191874": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_8_202010-02-20201195": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_715_202018-08-2020299": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_582_202015-07-2020759": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_91_201920-08-20193355": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1527_201921-10-20191088": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_515_202123-04-20211": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_94_202015-05-20202034": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_64_201925-06-20193729": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1215_201902-09-20191989": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_902_202030-09-2020639": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1295_201919-09-20191560": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_932_202003-10-2020608": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_61_202115-01-20211010": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_379_202010-08-20201335": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1454_201909-10-20191259": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1639_201904-01-2020996": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1_202021-01-2020786": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_861_201909-07-2019911": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_35_202020-02-20201082": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_93_202012-05-20202058": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_92_202129-01-20211386": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_328_202027-07-20201544": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_729_202027-08-2020958": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1888_201907-12-2019392": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1909_201920-12-201929": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_99_202116-02-2021689": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_251_202108-04-2021105": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_82_202129-01-2021898": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_250_202007-03-202047": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_62_202116-01-20211551": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1069_201916-08-2019178": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_690_202018-08-2020294": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1800_201928-11-2019559": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_104_202122-02-2021629": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_187_202028-02-2020156": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1644_201901-11-2019941": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_666_201929-08-20191615": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_357_202029-05-20201011": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6_202005-02-20201355": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_319_202106-03-2021478": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_12_202105-02-2021830": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_14_202105-01-20211674": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1067_201914-08-2019193": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_163_202017-02-2020307": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_185_202123-02-20211276": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1742_201918-11-2019730": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_770_201921-12-20192068": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1718_201925-11-2019615": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_701_201907-06-20191210": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_123_202029-02-2020135": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_348_202029-07-20201494": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1070_201920-08-2019131": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_174_202018-02-2020293": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1880_201907-12-2019388": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_927_202012-10-2020538": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1390_201924-09-20191468": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1542_201916-10-20191176": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_549_202006-07-2020837": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1301_201913-09-20191826": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_322_202119-03-2021361": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_630_202021-07-2020707": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_369_202007-08-20201365": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_657_201926-08-20191656": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_36_202005-02-2020565": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1033_201907-08-2019247": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1494_201917-10-20191148": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_21_202031-01-2020632": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_72_201902-07-20193702": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_402_202103-04-2021157": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_284_202008-07-20201742": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_45_202004-02-2020590": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_145_202024-01-2020725": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1140_201902-09-20191984": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_230_202126-03-2021207": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1436_201930-09-20191369": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_109_202108-02-2021804": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_841_202016-09-2020734": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1005_202008-10-2020566": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1081_201914-08-2019194": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_289_202102-03-2021537": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1316_201924-09-20191465": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_652_202005-08-2020576": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_178_202124-03-2021236": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_772_201921-12-20192069": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_867_202022-12-2020969": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1166_201928-08-201931": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_721_201907-11-20193048": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1815_201912-12-2019320": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1303_201913-09-20191828": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_218_202117-03-2021388": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_910_201920-07-2019439": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_888_202003-10-2020604": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_778_202023-09-2020691": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1337_201911-10-20191234": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_725_201912-06-20191165": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_262_202003-07-20201790": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1088_201916-08-2019179": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1286_201909-09-20191863": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_590_202014-07-2020781": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1233_202018-01-2021982": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1080_202028-10-2020397": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1079_202027-10-2020406": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_315_202022-07-20201579": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_825_201924-07-2019402": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1441_201930-09-20191374": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_353_202123-03-2021271": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_898_202023-09-2020697": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1203_201931-08-20192002": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_267_202016-05-20201073": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1407_201925-09-20191441": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_46_202020-01-2020809": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_599_201923-07-20192072": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_94_202017-01-2020842": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_809_202006-10-2020577": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1059_201909-08-2019214": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1756_201919-11-2019706": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1740_201918-11-2019728": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_73_202008-05-20202059": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_41_202113-01-20211576": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_363_202113-04-202145": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_38_202024-01-20201475": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1056_201909-08-2019211": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_47_202031-01-2020635": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1141_201926-08-201983": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1157_202009-11-2020294": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_721_201911-06-20191174": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_723_202004-09-2020868": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_552_201918-05-20191441": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_120_202026-05-20202007": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1792_201912-12-2019319": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_180_202006-03-202063": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1578_201926-10-2019973": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5_202002-01-20201032": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_798_201912-07-2019871": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1213_201902-09-20191987": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1230_202022-12-202020": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_45_202110-02-2021758": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_527_202003-07-2020852": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_558_202014-07-2020778": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_716_201901-11-20193063": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1069_202022-10-2020438": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_926_201907-08-2019240": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_254_202106-03-20211215": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1420_201926-09-20191416": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1737_201919-11-2019704": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1398_201909-10-20191258": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_59_202010-01-2020920": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1841_201930-11-2019531": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1106_201920-08-2019132": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1060_201927-08-201948": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_787_202014-09-2020753": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1719_201919-11-2019703": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_842_202023-09-2020694": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1129_201922-08-2019102": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1784_201922-11-2019654": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_387_202003-06-2020983": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_320_202106-03-2021480": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_178_202003-03-2020112": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1349_201919-09-20191563": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_22_202005-02-2020562": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5_202114-01-20211019": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1828_201904-12-2019465": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_869_202001-10-2020618": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_281_202020-03-20203": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_216_202103-03-20211238": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_769_201920-12-20192213": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_175_202018-02-2020294": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_727_202020-08-2020186": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_117_202106-02-2021817": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_967_201907-09-20191873": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1506_201914-10-20191221": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1012_201903-08-2019289": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_60_202116-01-20211549": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1466_201916-10-20191166": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_796_201928-06-20191074": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_132_202013-02-2020356": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1418_201921-10-20191081": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1437_201930-09-20191370": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1262_202018-12-202055": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1838_201930-11-2019528": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_130_202022-01-2020772": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_728_201915-11-20192950": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1103_201906-09-20191892": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1147_201930-08-20192017": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_214_202123-02-2021616": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_664_202022-07-2020687": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_419_202005-06-2020973": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_59_201911-06-20193737": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_278_202007-07-20201759": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1165_201928-08-201930": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_991_202005-10-2020597": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_603_201924-07-20192064": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1108_201920-08-2019134": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_347_202029-07-20201493": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1114_202003-11-2020337": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1053_201903-09-20191967": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1267_201912-09-20191844": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_661_202028-07-2020634": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_40_201902-05-20193852": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_349_202120-03-2021349": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_41_202010-02-2020402": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1348_202022-01-2021934": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_446_202112-04-202164": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_578_202016-07-2020746": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1361_201905-10-20191279": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_330_202031-07-2020594": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_878_202003-10-2020603": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1589_201922-10-20191062": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_99_201926-08-20193345": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1939_201916-12-2019107": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_576_201920-05-20191435": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_679_202007-08-2020548": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_276_202102-03-2021536": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_592_201919-07-20192113": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_471_202026-06-2020864": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1055_201909-08-2019210": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_958_201930-07-2019335": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_950_202029-10-2020378": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_245_202102-03-2021534": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1234_201904-09-20191946": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1205_202009-12-2020150": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_140_202023-01-2020743": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1952_201920-12-201934": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1455_201901-10-20191344": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_35_202006-01-2020977": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_966_202001-10-2020625": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_758_202001-09-2020929": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_798_202015-09-2020742": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_581_202017-07-2020729": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1190_202003-12-2020167": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1244_202016-12-202073": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1988_201904-01-20201004": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1043_202003-11-2020334": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1065_202021-10-2020454": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_965_202001-10-2020624": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_810_202006-10-2020578": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1602_201925-10-2019993": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1231_201904-09-20191944": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1950_201917-02-2020299": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1445_201916-10-20191164": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_266_202006-03-202074": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_172_202125-02-2021584": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1007_201916-08-2019173": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_803_202014-12-20201030": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1452_201914-10-20191219": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_661_201927-08-20191645": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_607_202007-08-2020545": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1406_201923-09-20191493": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_626_201901-08-20191983": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1787_201922-11-2019657": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_105_202027-02-2020174": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_318_202022-07-20201581": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1746_201927-11-2019576": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_118_202010-02-2020406": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_546_201909-05-20191506": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_992_202005-10-2020598": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_447_201910-05-20191494": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_854_202009-10-2020553": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_706_201916-10-20193129": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_523_202023-06-2020880": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1610_201923-10-20191034": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_90_201919-08-20193360": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1703_201912-11-2019825": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_53_201906-06-20193747": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_97_202022-01-2020770": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1350_201919-09-20191564": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_29_202005-02-2020564": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_20_202107-01-20211064": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_649_201920-08-20191702": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1164_201929-08-201911": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_631_202012-08-2020464": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1192_201904-10-20191293": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_317_202123-03-2021265": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_596_202014-07-2020784": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_75_202029-01-2020657": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_408_202005-06-2020971": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3395_201931-10-20191455": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1159_202021-07-20201935": "DENIED", + "Bail_187_202028-01-20201342": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_418_202116-04-2021302": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1844_201901-07-20191672": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1_202101-01-2021993": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_838_202009-06-20201368": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_194_202123-02-2021675": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3004_202005-01-20214306": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1345_202029-07-2020545": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2515_202020-11-20201501": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_359_202013-03-2020101": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1530_202001-10-20202901": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1264_202109-04-2021135": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1404_201920-06-20191833": "DENIED", + "Bail_103_202021-03-20201": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1911_202009-10-20202696": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3123_201901-10-20192171": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_323_202021-12-202030": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2198_202006-11-20201904": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_904_202123-03-2021709": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_194_202003-06-20201481": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_438_202007-03-2020138": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1205_202014-08-2020255": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1562_201927-05-20192367": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3519_201906-11-20191342": "DENIED", + "Bail_4022_201921-01-20201571": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_334_202019-02-2020588": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1965_202009-10-20202700": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2857_202001-01-20214443": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_739_202030-05-20201527": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1686_201921-06-20191813": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_90_202118-01-20213719": "DENIED", + "Bail_16_202007-01-20201803": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_14579_202122-03-20215125": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1522_202004-09-20203370": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1108_202003-07-2020999": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_93_202001-02-20201226": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2212_201914-08-2019371": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2805_202008-01-20214061": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_305_202016-12-202060": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1511_202003-09-20203427": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1619_202007-09-20203294": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_14625_202123-03-20215038": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2482_201924-08-2019156": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_72_202016-07-2020762": "DENIED", + "Bail_2994_201923-10-20191585": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1237_202015-07-2020808": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1896_201901-07-20191678": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1418_201910-05-20192816": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_441_202127-01-20217423": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3071_202006-01-20214239": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1120_202122-02-20216413": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1038_202014-07-20202015": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_544_202016-05-20201646": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_754_202018-06-20201238": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1070_201915-05-20192678": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1584_201924-05-20192429": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_805_202003-06-20201488": "GRANTED", + "Bail_248_202010-02-2020791": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1042_202010-07-2020873": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_9_202031-07-2020120": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1362_202003-09-20203420": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_207_202125-02-2021644": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2583_202019-12-2020224": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1896_202028-09-20204631": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1176_202015-07-2020804": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3130_201919-11-20191080": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1401_202104-03-20215929": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2534_201922-08-2019186": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1149_202103-04-2021361": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1429_202029-09-20202941": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_217_202130-01-20213156": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_701_202025-06-20201139": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_23_202112-01-20213925": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_215_202121-01-20213512": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_222_202013-02-2020756": "DENIED", + "Bail_3300_201905-11-20191373": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_226_202013-02-2020757": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1671_201907-06-20192035": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3172_201906-11-20191325": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2976_201904-10-20192100": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2128_202016-10-20202510": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_406_202018-05-20201633": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1665_202006-10-20202825": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2209_201901-08-2019611": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2218_202003-11-20202055": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1249_202006-08-2020374": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2219_202026-11-20201254": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_98_202102-02-2021826": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2197_202020-11-20201491": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3110_202007-01-20214165": "DENIED", + "Bail_4006_201910-01-20201720": "DENIED", + "Bail_1503_201921-05-20192503": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1336_202006-08-2020380": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_150_202019-02-2020581": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1057_201907-05-20192892": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2110_202020-10-20202425": "DENIED", + "Bail_3137_201903-10-20192136": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1188_202103-04-2021363": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_14550_202119-03-20215275": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2404_202011-11-20201699": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_853_202012-06-20201312": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_162_202006-02-20201088": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1838_202012-10-20202673": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1254_202013-07-2020860": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1319_201917-05-20192618": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_786_202003-06-20201486": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1187_202020-07-2020699": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_235_202012-11-2020171": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_60_202120-01-2021902": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2817_201901-10-20192161": "GRANTED", + "Bail_35_202020-02-2020519": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_740_202009-07-2020892": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1929_202007-10-20202782": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_135_202112-02-2021744": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1177_202008-07-2020930": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_700_202017-06-20201269": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3361_201925-10-20191538": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_51_202031-01-20201268": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1117_202007-07-2020944": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1542_202006-10-20202821": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_388_202101-04-2021345": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2858_202023-12-202085": "DENIED", + "Bail_3435_201919-11-20191083": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1020_202019-06-20201224": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1646_202112-03-20215584": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2041_202023-10-20202320": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2772_202026-11-20203985": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1124_202010-07-2020875": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1837_201926-06-20191735": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2185_201901-08-2019608": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1837_202003-10-20202882": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2442_201929-08-201925": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2168_201926-07-2019777": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1768_202029-09-20202952": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1108_202122-02-20216404": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1341_202019-08-202099": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1514_201921-05-20192505": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_256_202025-02-2020439": "DENIED", + "Bail_1752_201917-06-20191925": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3441_201919-11-20191084": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_750_202106-02-20216905": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1974_201917-07-20191124": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1056_202015-07-20201984": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_358_202030-05-20201523": "DENIED", + "Bail_2081_201921-08-2019210": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_468_202017-03-202071": "DENIED", + "Bail_3986_201924-12-201915": "GRANTED", + "Bail_166_202021-01-20201559": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3725_201904-01-20201896": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1519_202004-09-20203369": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1760_201917-06-20191926": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1724_202025-09-20203016": "DENIED", + "Bail_1667_201912-06-20191975": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3144_201904-10-20192106": "GRANTED", + "Bail_36_202004-02-20201138": "DENIED", + "Bail_3850_201923-12-201956": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2776_202004-12-20201047": "DENIED", + "Bail_3641_201921-11-20191006": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2265_202022-10-20202368": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1000847_201909-05-2019574": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1350_202030-07-2020486": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1948_201917-07-20191122": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2133_202009-11-20201793": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1314_202003-11-20202042": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_408_202022-05-20201577": "DENIED", + "Bail_3780_201927-11-2019867": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2012_202006-10-20202835": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_521_202017-03-202073": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2122_202011-11-20201688": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_864_202120-03-2021828": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_45_202024-02-2020477": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_851_202018-06-20201239": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_745_202016-06-20202259": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1525_202005-10-20202854": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_242_202103-03-2021577": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1792_202118-03-20215319": "DENIED", + "Bail_2333_201901-10-20192157": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2341_201906-08-2019514": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_674_202029-05-20201538": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1944_201909-07-20191426": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1178_202022-07-20201910": "DENIED", + "Bail_3594_201923-11-2019945": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1398_202018-08-2020143": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3089_202014-01-20213839": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3525_201921-11-2019999": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_322_202021-12-202029": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1118_202001-07-20201055": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_795_202030-05-20201535": "DENIED", + "Bail_42_202007-01-20201806": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_92_202101-02-2021833": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2086_201924-07-2019856": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2341_202005-11-20201983": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_47_202116-01-2021928": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1079_202119-02-20216472": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_394_202020-03-202012": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_679_202016-05-20201650": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3576_201929-11-2019781": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1140_202003-07-20201000": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_372_202024-02-2020495": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_498_202007-03-2020146": "DENIED", + "Bail_2346_201920-08-2019257": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1863_202020-10-20202416": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2195_201920-08-2019248": "DENIED", + "Bail_3712_201902-12-2019714": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_312_202105-03-20211515": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_270_202004-03-2020233": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1767_202007-10-20202769": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1578_202015-10-20202534": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_823_202005-06-20201445": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2264_202003-11-20202058": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3016_202021-12-2020184": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_696_202022-05-20201588": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3661_201910-12-2019522": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_509_202020-03-202014": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1437_202006-08-2020389": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3959_201920-01-20201597": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_308_202029-02-2020321": "DENIED", + "Bail_1956_201915-07-20191213": "DENIED", + "Bail_2298_201917-08-2019325": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3059_201930-09-20192206": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2631_201929-08-201938": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1928_201902-07-20191626": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_55_202114-01-20213821": "DENIED", + "Bail_3037_201905-10-20192056": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2146_201901-08-2019601": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1814_201909-07-20191418": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_365_202101-02-20213097": "DENIED", + "Bail_1505_201906-06-20192065": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2344_201916-08-2019349": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_223_202101-03-2021621": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2986_201916-10-20191820": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2918_202012-01-20213940": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_420_202122-04-2021297": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1000845_201909-05-2019572": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_820_202017-06-20201270": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1085_202002-07-20201023": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1265_202101-04-2021463": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_969_202019-06-20201216": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1590_201901-07-20191658": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_527_202013-05-20201673": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1263_202107-04-2021206": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2413_201922-08-2019181": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_179_202007-02-20201041": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3748_201927-11-2019861": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1730_202018-11-20201592": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1317_202023-07-2020626": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2973_202018-12-2020285": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1631_202030-09-20202913": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6_202005-03-2020210": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_546_202011-05-20202343": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_722_202001-06-20201514": "DENIED", + "Bail_1202_201909-05-20192846": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1171_202008-07-2020928": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3824_201902-12-2019720": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3053_202007-01-20214160": "DENIED", + "Bail_29_202008-01-20201761": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3878_201918-12-2019179": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100448_201928-09-2019172": "DENIED", + "Bail_2194_201917-08-2019322": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_828_202105-03-20211525": "DENIED", + "Bail_1964_201909-07-20191427": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3050_202023-12-202091": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1632_201903-02-2020226": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2138_202009-11-20201795": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_14672_202124-03-20214980": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3019_201927-09-20192284": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1246_202014-07-2020845": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1721_201919-06-20191864": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1305_202103-04-2021371": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_187_202015-02-2020711": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_737_202029-05-20201545": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_665_202006-07-2020959": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3613_201903-01-20201936": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_158_202102-02-2021170": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2020_202030-09-20204584": "DENIED", + "Bail_2028_201922-07-2019963": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1565_201929-05-20192273": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_15_202028-02-2020345": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3484_201923-12-201949": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1100_202001-07-20201053": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1204_202010-07-2020880": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1715_202016-10-20202496": "DENIED", + "Bail_1820_201925-07-2019809": "GRANTED", + "Bail_217_202031-01-20201255": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1508_201915-05-20192686": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_879_202005-06-20201453": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_627_202102-02-20217089": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3643_201921-12-201990": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_258_202120-01-20213577": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1754_201924-06-20191776": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1621_201904-06-20192104": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_238_202103-03-2021573": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3506_201913-12-2019432": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_325_202019-05-20201616": "DENIED", + "Bail_107_202013-01-20201662": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2888_201910-10-20191989": "DENIED", + "Bail_1492_201927-05-20192362": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_16_202007-02-20201027": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_501_202111-02-20212452": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_399_202103-02-20212977": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_622_202016-05-20201649": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3598_201922-11-2019965": "DENIED", + "Bail_3458_201910-12-2019520": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_755_202030-05-20201530": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2246_202028-10-20202268": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2924_201922-10-20191632": "DENIED", + "Bail_1709_201914-06-20191954": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3640_201928-11-2019810": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3601_201920-11-20191048": "DENIED", + "Bail_1354_201929-05-20192265": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1921_202028-09-20204641": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1661_202025-09-20203013": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1057_202025-06-20201151": "DENIED", + "Bail_38_202017-02-2020661": "DENIED", + "Bail_3536_201919-11-20191090": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4063_201920-02-2020521": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3056_201903-10-20192131": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3928_201903-01-20201939": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_946_202025-06-20201145": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_650_202021-05-20201595": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_530_202126-02-20211786": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1905_202012-10-20202675": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_14624_202123-03-20215037": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1073_202015-07-20201995": "DENIED", + "Bail_1673_201909-07-20191415": "DENIED", + "Bail_2989_201904-10-20192101": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6_202029-01-2020227": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3283_201921-10-20191702": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3796_201919-12-2019144": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2294_202019-10-20204338": "DENIED", + "Bail_3910_201919-12-2019151": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1473_202018-08-2020147": "DENIED", + "Bail_1781_201918-06-20191892": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1857_201903-07-20191590": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_202_202027-10-2020227": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_656_202003-06-20201483": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_173_202020-02-2020535": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1775_202029-09-20202954": "DENIED", + "Bail_3271_201930-10-20191480": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1801_202003-10-20202881": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_105_202129-01-20213206": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1076_202122-03-2021780": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_398_202030-05-20201524": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1800_202028-09-20202982": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2399_201926-08-2019120": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2422_202010-11-20201739": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_183_202122-02-2021686": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_233_202102-03-2021593": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_483_202004-03-2020245": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4061_201921-01-20201575": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_13_202005-02-20201118": "DENIED", + "Bail_2921_201923-10-20191584": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_215_202024-02-2020482": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2653_202025-11-20201348": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1029_202014-08-2020254": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3688_201919-12-2019139": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_217_202101-03-2021616": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2282_201907-08-2019480": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1915_202007-10-20202776": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1130_202002-07-20201032": "DENIED", + "Bail_1914_201904-07-20191543": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3199_201918-10-20191780": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1_202111-02-20216662": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_868_202112-03-20211224": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2362_202011-11-20201697": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_512_202110-02-20212530": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_396_202019-05-20201617": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_416_202013-03-2020104": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2216_202024-11-20201422": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2860_202012-01-20213939": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_397_202112-02-20212378": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2223_201931-07-2019675": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1811_202022-10-20202352": "GRANTED", + "Bail_241_202005-02-20201114": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3301_201931-10-20191453": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3826_201912-12-2019465": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1865_202025-09-20204650": "DENIED", + "Bail_3716_201930-11-2019748": "DENIED", + "Bail_3715_201923-11-2019954": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2679_201920-11-20191032": "DENIED", + "Bail_3924_201919-12-2019152": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2157_202014-10-20202618": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2051_202003-10-20204553": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1325_202102-04-2021429": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100380_201927-08-20197": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2361_202009-11-20201809": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_567_202011-05-20202359": "DENIED", + "Bail_144_202010-02-2020787": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1452_202021-09-20203057": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1258_202106-04-2021251": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2652_202015-12-2020469": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_252_202024-02-2020485": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_40_202003-03-2020264": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_870_202011-06-20201334": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2814_202005-12-2020995": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_421_202027-02-2020383": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2088_202005-10-20204537": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2511_202018-11-20201597": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1994_202025-11-20201330": "DENIED", + "Bail_65_202029-01-20201301": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1981_201911-07-20191374": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2114_202022-10-20202359": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3100_201918-10-20191775": "DENIED", + "Bail_2546_201922-08-2019189": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2730_201931-10-20191450": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4070_201906-01-20201863": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_298_202014-12-202081": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_107_202007-02-20201034": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_492_202119-02-20212112": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_891_202116-03-20211087": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1197_202102-03-20216004": "DENIED", + "Bail_4080_201929-01-20201309": "DENIED", + "Bail_3909_201918-12-2019183": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1423_202016-10-20202491": "DENIED", + "Bail_3546_201929-11-2019779": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2205_202022-10-20202362": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3269_201924-10-20191559": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2663_201915-10-20191846": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3726_201902-06-20201494": "DENIED", + "Bail_2111_201922-07-2019970": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_826_202126-02-20211796": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_620_202021-05-20202326": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_486_202019-03-202034": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_742_202016-06-20201280": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_654_202122-02-20212028": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_9_202006-03-2020204": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1531_201930-05-20192220": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_340_202102-02-20213037": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1476_202013-08-2020292": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2424_202011-11-20201700": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1851_202003-11-20202045": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1983_201908-07-20191462": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3195_201918-10-20191779": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_54_202120-01-20213562": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2837_201928-11-2019803": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_122_202007-02-20201039": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_532_202018-03-202052": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101_202015-02-2020706": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_20_202106-01-2021965": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3660_201904-12-2019661": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_13_202015-05-2020124": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_770_202026-06-20201114": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3628_201921-12-201989": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1430_202018-08-2020145": "DENIED", + "Bail_2221_201916-08-2019342": "DENIED", + "Bail_3888_201923-12-201958": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_488_202125-02-20211832": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1717_202007-10-20202764": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3917_201923-12-201961": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1783_202021-09-20204668": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_666_202014-05-20201665": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2213_201926-08-2019113": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_187_202121-01-20213509": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2596_202019-11-20201567": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_953_202118-03-2021965": "DENIED", + "Bail_4027_201907-01-20201820": "GRANTED", + "Bail_6_202003-02-20201177": "DENIED", + "Bail_3337_201926-10-20191499": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1295_202023-07-2020623": "DENIED", + "Bail_3760_201910-12-2019523": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1251_202017-07-2020739": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1048_202119-03-2021891": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_671_202022-05-20201585": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1133_202002-07-20201033": "DENIED", + "Bail_3783_201919-12-2019143": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_161_202006-02-20201087": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_241_202103-03-2021576": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_867_202012-06-20201314": "DENIED", + "Bail_1573_201929-05-20192275": "DENIED", + "Bail_1807_201910-07-20191394": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_278_202108-03-2021526": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2675_202015-12-2020475": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1192_202024-07-2020598": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_217_202006-11-2020206": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2015_202022-10-20202356": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1889_201906-07-20191475": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_847_202026-06-20201115": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_953_202010-07-2020872": "DENIED", + "Bail_2140_201926-07-2019773": "DENIED", + "Bail_1240_201914-05-20192731": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_495_202122-02-20212016": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3476_201921-11-2019997": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_196_202021-10-2020233": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_326_202021-12-202033": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2463_202009-11-20201810": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_366_202101-02-20213098": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1198_202021-07-2020678": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_432_202013-03-2020105": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2077_201931-07-2019662": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1709_202029-09-20202949": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_299_202106-02-20212749": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_344_202101-02-20213096": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1129_202006-07-2020971": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2430_202027-11-20201185": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_640_202019-05-20201626": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2794_202014-12-2020547": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1699_202007-09-20203301": "DENIED", + "Bail_2022_201924-07-2019847": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_991_202001-07-20201047": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_192_202123-02-2021673": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1111_202006-07-2020965": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1434_201910-05-20192818": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2086_202003-11-20202051": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1379_201909-05-20192851": "DENIED", + "Bail_3251_201902-12-2019708": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_38_202007-02-20201029": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_637_202022-05-20201581": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4054_201920-12-2019126": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2269_202012-11-20201653": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1485_201913-05-20192774": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2056_202012-10-20202681": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1247_202030-07-20201851": "DENIED", + "Bail_2920_201928-09-20192232": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1744_202007-09-20203305": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3812_201903-01-20201937": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_613_202019-05-20201625": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3357_201915-11-20191173": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1710_201917-06-20191922": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1298_202006-08-2020376": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_747_202008-06-20201401": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2196_202028-10-20202267": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2314_202002-11-20202142": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1804_201909-07-20191417": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3095_201910-10-20191994": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3619_201919-12-2019138": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_281_202017-02-2020679": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3045_201910-10-20191993": "GRANTED", + "Bail_138_202007-02-20201018": "DENIED", + "Bail_1545_201907-06-20192029": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2906_202014-12-2020551": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_306_202119-01-20217670": "GRANTED", + "Bail_200_202020-02-2020520": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1396_202108-04-2021169": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_254_202024-02-2020486": "DENIED", + "Bail_2118_201924-07-2019858": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2284_202019-10-20204335": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1192_202125-03-2021602": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2669_202015-12-2020471": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2647_202011-12-2020778": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_119_202017-08-2020192": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_846_202101-03-20211723": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1686_202029-09-20202947": "DENIED", + "Bail_1588_201904-06-20192100": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1696_201912-06-20191977": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1774_202021-09-20204664": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3908_201919-12-2019150": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2880_202011-12-2020788": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_404_202026-02-2020408": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3127_201911-10-20191941": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_317_202110-02-20212518": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_174_202119-02-2021702": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1735_201921-06-20191818": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_338_202004-03-2020238": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2235_202022-10-20202364": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1166_202022-07-20201905": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_984_202024-06-20201163": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1058_202025-06-20201152": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2668_202019-12-2020226": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_903_202122-03-2021763": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1400_202028-09-20202977": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1229_202007-08-2020342": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1114_202006-07-2020967": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1_202028-02-2020215": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_80_202019-02-2020579": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1239_202031-07-2020458": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3052_202021-12-2020188": "DENIED", + "Bail_1655_201901-06-20192167": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3290_201913-11-20191244": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1476_201904-06-20192097": "DENIED", + "Bail_1566_201928-05-20192314": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_785_202001-06-20201518": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1675_202115-03-20215518": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3797_201917-12-2019197": "DENIED", + "Bail_1792_201927-06-20191717": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2042_202002-11-20202132": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2730_202016-12-2020425": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1922_201908-07-20191458": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3111_202003-02-20212986": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1544_201903-06-20192129": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3253_201922-10-20191642": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_574_202019-05-20201622": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2924_202005-01-20214304": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1992_202016-10-20202503": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3527_201920-11-20191040": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2735_202027-11-20201194": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2240_202002-11-20202140": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2521_202014-12-2020534": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2018_202020-10-20202421": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4014_201904-01-20201902": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1871_202008-10-20202717": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2120_201902-08-2019559": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1671_202017-09-20203088": "GRANTED", + "Bail_121_202024-01-20201464": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_840_202005-06-20201447": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2365_202017-11-20201620": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3564_201911-12-2019490": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1913_201904-07-20191542": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1165_202008-07-2020926": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2152_202028-10-20202265": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_964_202025-06-20201146": "DENIED", + "Bail_3359_201906-11-20191328": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1113_202009-07-2020893": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3234_201901-11-20191418": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2169_202012-10-20204433": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2258_202009-11-20201807": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3249_201919-11-20191081": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_174_202128-01-20213280": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_570_202019-05-20201621": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1313_202101-03-20216080": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1311_202024-07-2020601": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3319_201925-10-20191534": "DENIED", + "Bail_1516_201904-06-20192098": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1498_202010-08-2020324": "DENIED", + "Bail_3088_201914-10-20191898": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1310_202021-07-2020680": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1271_201917-05-20192617": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1018_202120-03-2021833": "DENIED", + "Bail_1529_201917-05-20192625": "DENIED", + "Bail_3781_201917-12-2019196": "DENIED", + "Bail_1920_201908-07-20191456": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2076_201922-07-2019969": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1377_202016-10-20202489": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2206_202005-11-20201973": "DENIED", + "Bail_1676_201906-06-20192070": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3918_201917-12-2019202": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1364_202007-08-2020344": "GRANTED", + "Bail_239_202031-01-20201259": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1626_201901-06-20192164": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1072_202122-03-2021779": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2989_202016-12-2020432": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_825_202126-02-20211795": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_774_202120-03-2021822": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_450_202108-02-20212686": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3110_202017-12-20203616": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_447_202007-03-2020140": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1163_202006-07-2020975": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3065_201922-10-20191633": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1399_202007-09-20203280": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_707_202030-05-20201525": "GRANTED", + "Bail_237_202013-02-2020749": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_53_202118-01-2021921": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2210_201920-08-2019249": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1079_202029-06-20201102": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_30_202120-01-20213561": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6_202105-01-20214284": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_214_202121-01-20213511": "DENIED", + "Bail_1778_201919-06-20191865": "DENIED", + "Bail_1808_201916-07-20191155": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_567_202019-05-20201619": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_882_202010-06-20201350": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1288_202005-08-20201803": "DENIED", + "Bail_2009_201922-07-2019959": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_208_202125-02-2021645": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3861_201908-01-20201765": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1602_201929-05-20192277": "GRANTED", + "Bail_779_201927-05-20192357": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_140_202010-02-2020806": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_154_202117-02-2021728": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2447_201917-08-2019329": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2854_202018-12-2020277": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1875_202003-10-20202887": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_201_202004-03-2020228": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2282_202026-11-20201257": "DENIED", + "Bail_222_202024-01-20201475": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3347_201921-11-2019995": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_78_202012-05-20201678": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3965_201923-12-201963": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_68_202122-01-2021886": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1537_201924-05-20192427": "DENIED", + "Bail_149_202027-01-20201403": "DENIED", + "Bail_3421_201916-11-20191135": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2019_201916-07-20191164": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3946_201924-12-201914": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_78_202125-01-2021876": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_46_202025-02-2020434": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2795_201915-10-20191848": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1009_202020-06-20201192": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_506_202112-02-20212383": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_337_202004-03-2020237": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1665_201904-06-20192108": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1422_202016-10-20202490": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_186_202118-01-20213729": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1054_202001-07-20201049": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1078_202105-04-2021314": "GRANTED", + "Bail_9_202008-01-20201760": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_16691_202117-04-20214474": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_905_202030-06-20202124": "DENIED", + "Bail_2247_201908-08-2019457": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3281_201905-11-20191371": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_209_202117-02-20212247": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2127_202016-10-20202509": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1623_202018-12-2020263": "DENIED", + "Bail_1423_201913-05-20192771": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1390_202107-04-2021214": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1007_202020-06-20201190": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1550_201906-06-20192066": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1232_202125-03-2021604": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1801_201917-07-20191117": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1107_202017-07-2020733": "DENIED", + "Bail_3902_201923-12-201959": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_10_202006-03-2020205": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1231_202126-03-2021552": "DENIED", + "Bail_126_202021-01-20201553": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_531_202122-02-20212019": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3500_201907-11-20191286": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2145_202005-11-20201971": "GRANTED", + "Bail_265_202004-06-20201456": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_639_202010-06-20201339": "DENIED", + "Bail_3381_201920-11-20191035": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1530_201921-05-20192506": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1040_202124-03-2021658": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1279_202013-08-2020286": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2636_202026-11-20201272": "DENIED", + "Bail_3555_201921-11-20191002": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1353_202122-04-202124": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_212_202122-01-20213466": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1353_202017-11-2020256": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_438_202123-03-2021215": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1304_202029-10-2020417": "DENIED", + "Bail_3_202117-02-20211148": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_270_202002-11-2020374": "GRANTED", + "BailApplication_1389_201904-10-2019664": "DENIED", + "BailApplication_1488_201923-10-2019571": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_170_202118-02-2021599": "GRANTED", + "BailApplication_967_201910-07-2019394": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1294_202028-10-2020438": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_415_202120-03-2021227": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1426_202008-12-2020133": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_626_202126-04-202125": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_54_202120-01-2021930": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_140_202108-02-20211188": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1371_202023-11-2020221": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_776_202011-12-2020960": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_775_202011-12-2020959": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1356_202009-11-2020308": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_298_202105-03-2021393": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_119_202102-02-2021814": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1476_202007-12-2020143": "DENIED", + "BailApplication_1467_201914-10-2019634": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1176_202013-10-2020595": "DENIED", + "BailApplication_1717_201919-11-2019406": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1466_202007-12-2020142": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_520_202018-06-2020338": "DENIED", + "BailApplication_1094_201915-07-2019362": "GRANTED", + "BailApplication_798_201902-05-2019832": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_742_202013-08-2020190": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_260_202005-03-202056": "DENIED", + "BailApplication_954_201911-06-2019556": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_214_202018-03-20205": "DENIED", + "BailApplication_1810_201916-12-2019148": "DENIED", + "BailApplication_1499_201921-10-2019596": "GRANTED", + "BailApplication_994_201908-07-2019418": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_60_202118-01-2021948": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_160_202003-03-202079": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_290_202019-05-2020536": "DENIED", + "BailApplication_1069_201908-07-2019427": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_103_202125-01-2021893": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_163_202028-02-2020101": "GRANTED", + "BailApplication_139_202019-02-2020159": "GRANTED", + "BailApplication_1076_201911-07-2019382": "DENIED", + "BailApplication_1623_201902-12-2019284": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1320_202004-11-2020356": "DENIED", + "BailApplication_1398_201926-09-2019711": "GRANTED", + "BailApplication_205_202014-02-2020194": "DENIED", + "BailApplication_1137_201923-07-2019275": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_161_202124-02-2021525": "DENIED", + "BailApplication_1228_201926-08-201913": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1351_202009-11-2020307": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_155_202112-02-20211165": "GRANTED", + "BailApplication_999_201925-06-2019504": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_903_202028-08-2020865": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1118_202030-09-2020665": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_75_202119-01-2021940": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_998_202007-09-2020820": "DENIED", + "BailApplication_1394_201923-09-2019754": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_238_202013-03-202017": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_210_202101-03-2021461": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1517_202021-12-202046": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_771_202010-12-2020969": "GRANTED", + "BailApplication_836_201917-05-2019720": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_437_202123-03-2021214": "DENIED", + "BailApplication_1077_201908-07-2019428": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_790_202018-12-2020923": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_106_202101-02-20211245": "GRANTED", + "BailApplication_1441_201903-10-2019683": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1412_202023-11-2020225": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_317_202101-03-2021468": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_401_202123-03-2021209": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1438_202005-12-2020150": "DENIED", + "BailApplication_1229_201908-08-2019141": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1222_202020-10-2020511": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_249_202006-03-202043": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_331_202012-05-2020567": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_157_202005-03-202049": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_205_202005-03-202054": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_589_202013-10-20201329": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1527_202023-12-202020": "DENIED", + "BailApplication_869_201924-05-2019670": "GRANTED", + "BailApplication_977_201909-07-2019407": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_667_202009-11-20201179": "GRANTED", + "BailApplication_1003_201926-06-2019489": "GRANTED", + "BailApplication_1068_201905-07-2019446": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_183_202004-03-202066": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_369_202020-05-2020529": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1368_202009-11-2020310": "DENIED", + "BailApplication_1479_201917-10-2019615": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102_202007-03-202025": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_542_202012-08-2020195": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1540_202001-01-20211067": "GRANTED", + "BailApplication_937_201919-06-2019520": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_47_202111-01-20211013": "GRANTED", + "BailApplication_1360_201919-09-2019800": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_627_202126-04-202126": "DENIED", + "BailApplication_1562_201930-10-2019525": "GRANTED", + "BailApplication_1382_201921-09-2019771": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1190_202014-10-2020586": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_788_202017-08-2020140": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1462_202010-12-2020105": "DENIED", + "BailApplication_1815_201929-11-2019308": "GRANTED", + "BailApplication_1040_201912-07-2019371": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1352_202021-11-2020232": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_691_202019-11-20201137": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_182_202003-03-202085": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_211_202123-02-2021555": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_576_202126-04-202116": "GRANTED", + "BailApplication_1541_201922-11-2019381": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_395_202028-05-2020485": "DENIED", + "BailApplication_2024_201924-12-201918": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_722_202019-08-202076": "DENIED", + "BailApplication_1104_201919-07-2019322": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_185_202101-03-20211120": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_530_202016-06-2020371": "DENIED", + "BailApplication_893_201910-06-2019561": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_731_202001-12-20201038": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_743_202003-12-20201012": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_342_202108-03-2021361": "DENIED", + "BailApplication_1262_201924-08-201920": "GRANTED", + "BailApplication_1539_201930-10-2019524": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_596_202126-04-202118": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_119_202103-02-20211225": "GRANTED", + "BailApplication_976_201930-07-2019225": "GRANTED", + "BailApplication_944_201915-06-2019540": "DENIED", + "BailApplication_891_201927-05-2019651": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_397_202028-05-2020487": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1191_202019-10-2020532": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_639_202031-10-20201247": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_156_202112-02-20211166": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1506_202015-12-202072": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1165_202019-10-2020527": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1419_202026-11-2020190": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_439_202008-06-2020416": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_611_202119-04-202114": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_52_202115-01-20211334": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_111_202102-02-20211232": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_118_202103-02-20211224": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_642_202002-11-20201240": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1035_202016-09-2020745": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_90_202122-01-2021905": "DENIED", + "BailApplication_1181_201903-08-2019182": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_292_202126-02-2021485": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_604_202126-04-202119": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_687_202019-11-20201133": "GRANTED", + "BailApplication_1592_201913-11-2019452": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_167_202003-03-202083": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_400_202029-05-2020471": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_241_202123-02-2021557": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6_202104-01-20211418": "GRANTED", + "BailApplication_1272_201924-08-201923": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1202_202012-11-2020259": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1521_202006-01-20211048": "DENIED", + "BailApplication_1491_201918-10-2019611": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1455_202003-12-2020165": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_104_202101-02-20211243": "GRANTED", + "BailApplication_1246_201920-08-201972": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_409_202123-03-2021211": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1425_202026-11-2020194": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1174_202022-10-2020471": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_184_202101-03-20211119": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_770_202010-12-2020968": "GRANTED", + "BailApplication_1172_201930-07-2019228": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_272_202006-03-202046": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_196_202122-02-2021570": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_524_202108-04-202147": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1468_202010-12-2020106": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1178_202016-10-2020557": "DENIED", + "BailApplication_1247_201913-08-2019118": "GRANTED", + "BailApplication_1102_201927-07-2019239": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_319_202110-03-2021341": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_660_202007-08-2020218": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1535_202023-12-202023": "DENIED", + "BailApplication_1338_201917-09-2019825": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_171_202105-02-2021756": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_746_202003-12-20201015": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_541_202106-04-202195": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_283_202026-05-2020495": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1359_202005-12-2020147": "GRANTED", + "BailApplication_1493_201902-11-2019507": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_794_202018-12-2020925": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_145_202109-02-20211182": "GRANTED", + "BailApplication_1825_201905-12-2019243": "DENIED", + "BailApplication_1508_201918-10-2019612": "GRANTED", + "BailApplication_1531_201921-10-2019600": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1233_202028-10-2020431": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1342_202004-11-2020359": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_650_202020-08-202039": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_30_202107-01-20211039": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1534_202023-12-202022": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_62_202118-01-2021950": "DENIED", + "BailApplication_1903_201913-12-2019169": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_532_202020-08-202038": "DENIED", + "BailApplication_1381_201916-10-2019619": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_690_202019-11-20201136": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_273_202006-03-202047": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_188_202123-02-2021553": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1526_202021-12-202047": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1182_202012-11-2020287": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_59_202018-01-2020682": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_236_202108-02-2021733": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1234_201916-09-20191365": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_499_202009-06-2020539": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_295_202122-02-2021567": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_414_202012-08-2020863": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1658_201907-11-2019937": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_126_202102-03-20212024": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1322_202021-12-202046": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1738_201926-11-2019580": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1779_201925-11-2019628": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1404_201906-09-20191593": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1388_201903-09-20191767": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1310_202015-12-202081": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_658_202023-11-20201392": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1181_201909-08-2019270": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_269_202126-02-2021498": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2053_201917-12-2019165": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1198_202009-11-2020328": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1542_201925-09-20191160": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_922_202010-09-2020832": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_875_202004-09-2020869": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_172_202020-02-2020226": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1239_202005-01-20211152": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_35_202004-02-2020483": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_831_202025-08-20205": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1393_201904-09-20191715": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1941_201920-12-201991": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6_202105-01-20213192": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1794_201906-12-2019396": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_160_202109-02-2021697": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_758_201914-05-20191154": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_780_201928-05-20191038": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_686_202023-07-2020195": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1980_201909-12-2019362": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_152_202106-02-2021757": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_106_202119-02-20212259": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_904_201915-07-2019532": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_139_202109-03-20211865": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1236_202024-11-2020240": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1098_202020-10-2020483": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1994_201907-12-2019385": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1078_202016-10-2020529": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1540_201923-09-20191186": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_810_201921-06-2019846": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_316_202126-02-2021504": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_750_202004-08-2020122": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1227_201906-09-20191587": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1806_201927-11-2019539": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_915_202021-09-2020756": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2095_201920-12-2019104": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2144_201924-12-20195": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_376_202016-07-20201015": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1234_202023-11-2020249": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1199_201921-08-2019125": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_490_202003-06-2020586": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_213_202018-03-202030": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_584_202025-06-2020434": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2042_201909-12-2019366": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_724_202020-07-2020234": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1014_202003-10-2020671": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1773_201925-11-2019627": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_688_202014-07-2020286": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_895_202018-09-2020785": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1159_201931-08-20191834": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_280_202020-03-202013": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_88_202103-02-2021795": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1522_201921-09-20191214": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_18_202010-01-2020769": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_34_202031-01-2020551": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_203_202103-04-20211345": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_95_202022-01-2020618": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_941_202025-09-2020721": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_286_202019-03-202024": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2096_201920-12-2019105": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1161_201920-08-2019154": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_737_202028-07-2020158": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_342_202015-01-20211052": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_777_201903-06-2019931": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2116_201907-01-2020836": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1332_201903-09-20191756": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_616_202030-10-20201601": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_56_202031-01-2020554": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_409_202026-05-2020647": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_247_202109-02-2021700": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_272_202021-03-20203": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2128_201921-12-201970": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1071_202021-10-2020461": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1309_202018-12-202056": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_183_202105-03-2021425": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_996_202014-10-2020546": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2004_201921-12-201964": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1122_202004-11-2020385": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_894_202009-09-2020845": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1348_201903-09-20191758": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1867_201907-12-2019378": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_892_202009-09-2020844": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_482_201901-05-20191249": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1461_201916-09-20191378": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_736_201908-05-20191208": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_683_202004-12-20201272": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_782_201914-05-20191155": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_227_202116-04-20211204": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1313_201912-09-20191497": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_301_202103-03-2021452": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2036_201910-01-2020781": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1527_201920-09-20191264": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_885_202019-09-2020772": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_247_202003-06-2020579": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_529_202005-06-2020567": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_287_202022-06-20201183": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1028_202009-10-2020609": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_564_202015-06-2020513": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1957_201904-01-2020881": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1376_202006-01-20211131": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1698_201905-12-2019414": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_705_202024-08-202013": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_66_202022-01-2020609": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_693_202010-12-20201213": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_521_202014-09-20202201": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_865_202028-09-2020708": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1668_201920-11-2019713": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_396_202021-05-2020668": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_11_202127-01-2021921": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_22_202107-01-20213163": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1508_201921-09-20191210": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_111_202028-01-2020572": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_909_201905-07-2019700": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1382_201903-09-20191765": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1285_202011-12-2020131": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_614_202007-07-2020339": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2175_201913-01-2020751": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_331_202016-05-2020707": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_340_202028-01-2021903": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1777_201916-11-2019743": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103_202118-02-2021606": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_608_202029-10-20201619": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1332_202002-01-20211190": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_450_202001-06-2020602": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_174_202123-02-2021533": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1615_201904-11-2019994": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1600_201918-10-20191065": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1338_201929-08-201929": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_256_202006-03-202054": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_680_202010-07-2020302": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_347_202119-03-2021267": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_897_201929-06-2019791": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_969_202003-10-2020667": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_438_202028-05-2020632": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_530_202009-06-2020545": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_993_202006-11-2020350": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1186_202007-11-2020341": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_189_202125-03-20211477": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1244_201920-08-2019158": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_39_202019-02-2020236": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_138_202109-03-20211864": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1744_201928-11-2019500": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1813_201916-11-2019748": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1929_201928-11-2019509": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_435_202026-05-2020655": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1065_202016-10-2020526": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_66_202026-02-2020154": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_443_201902-09-20192827": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_577_202013-10-20201858": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_467_202031-08-20202335": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_498_202005-09-20202258": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_9_202028-01-2020588": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1972_201909-12-2019361": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1161_202006-11-2020356": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_998_201917-07-2019511": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1307_201919-09-20191291": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_355_202105-03-2021432": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_783_202027-08-2020941": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_674_202024-07-2020177": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_995_202008-10-2020619": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_108_202019-02-2020242": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2063_201929-01-2020562": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_598_202020-06-2020468": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_714_202005-08-2020106": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2133_201921-12-201972": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_330_202008-02-2021734": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_196_202004-03-202068": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_934_202001-10-2020676": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_26_202018-01-2020670": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_684_202024-07-2020179": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1583_201901-11-20191007": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2146_201923-12-201932": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_16_202106-01-20213177": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_385_202026-05-2020644": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_366_202016-07-20201009": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_147_202101-03-2021480": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1594_201901-11-20191008": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_141_202025-02-2020177": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1531_201920-09-20191265": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_31_202003-02-2020503": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_823_201907-06-2019897": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_81_202110-02-2021675": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2154_201912-02-2020327": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1320_202011-12-2020135": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_15_202118-01-20211016": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_72_202103-02-20212666": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_556_202001-10-20201994": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_124_202126-02-20212082": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_45_202120-01-20213073": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1112_201913-08-2019236": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_138_202104-02-2021787": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1320_201917-09-20191317": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_911_202021-10-2020458": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1185_202012-11-2020289": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1335_202018-12-202060": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_919_202011-09-2020813": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_52_202018-01-2020678": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1693_201914-11-2019844": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_667_202024-11-20201364": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_870_202002-09-2020911": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1372_202024-12-20206": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1713_201927-11-2019536": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_429_202018-08-2020801": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_725_201921-06-2019845": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1078_201909-08-2019264": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_224_202027-02-2020138": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_942_202029-09-2020700": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_307_202021-03-20209": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_664_202024-11-20201361": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_372_202018-05-2020700": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_140_202025-02-2020176": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_556_202010-06-2020535": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_499_202005-09-20202259": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_496_202109-04-202154": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1659_201907-11-2019938": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_150_202115-03-20211767": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1875_201916-12-2019215": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1420_201907-09-20191563": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1689_201926-11-2019576": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_423_202021-05-2020676": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_726_201921-12-20191931": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_152_202115-03-20211769": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1103_202020-10-2020485": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_161_202119-03-2021261": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1778_201915-11-2019812": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_948_202019-09-2020777": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_56_202120-01-20211003": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_46_202003-02-2020506": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_77_202103-02-20212671": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_912_201903-07-2019741": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1216_202023-12-202021": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_458_202103-04-2021168": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1_202104-01-20213214": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_669_201903-12-20192146": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_984_201922-07-2019460": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_219_202108-04-20211241": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_771_202029-07-2020151": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1317_201931-08-20191848": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_419_202014-08-2020847": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1024_202007-10-2020644": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1042_202016-10-2020523": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1595_201901-11-20191009": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1705_201913-11-2019871": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_131_202104-02-2021785": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_427_202117-03-2021309": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1707_201925-11-2019622": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1408_201912-09-20191502": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1244_202004-12-2020196": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_319_202105-03-2021429": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1167_202002-11-2020422": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_327_202112-03-2021382": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1260_201929-08-201919": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1363_201904-09-20191712": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_289_202014-05-2020722": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1157_202003-11-2020406": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_697_202016-07-2020264": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103_202115-02-20212348": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2071_201917-12-2019169": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_704_202017-07-2020251": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_34_202010-01-2020774": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_67_202130-01-20212740": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_791_202024-08-202015": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_54_202122-01-20212986": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_294_201907-06-20192265": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_476_202002-09-20202309": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1367_202018-01-20211021": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1495_201920-09-20191256": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_47_202018-01-2020675": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_942_201901-08-2019363": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_113_202028-01-2020574": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1298_201931-08-20191843": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_65_202129-01-20212775": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_406_202018-05-2020705": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1324_201913-09-20191461": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1294_202011-12-2020133": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_30_202111-01-20213141": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_869_202003-09-2020888": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_890_201901-07-2019771": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_256_202124-02-2021518": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_38_202001-02-2020528": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7_202029-01-2020563": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_188_202125-03-20211476": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_287_202022-06-20201184": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1140_201914-08-2019217": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1139_201923-11-2019652": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_819_201920-06-2019851": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_920_202011-09-2020814": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2031_201907-12-2019388": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_754_202029-07-2020145": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1333_201916-09-20191368": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5_202118-01-20211015": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_342_202126-03-2021204": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_403_202021-05-2020672": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_558_202019-06-2020476": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1354_202004-01-20211173": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1200_201921-08-2019126": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_17_202106-01-20213178": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_89_202006-02-2020436": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_328_202013-05-2020732": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_225_202122-02-2021559": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1008_201919-07-2019483": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2150_201907-01-2020837": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1039_201901-08-2019369": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_42_202120-01-20213070": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_596_202020-10-20201719": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1709_201925-11-2019623": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_317_202011-05-2020737": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_93_202025-02-2020174": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1208_202012-11-2020295": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1510_201921-09-20191211": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_877_201904-07-2019719": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_816_202019-08-202058": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_112_202028-01-2020573": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_965_201911-07-2019610": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_417_202014-08-2020845": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_793_202024-08-202016": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_548_202130-04-20215": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1805_201904-12-2019429": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_654_202006-07-2020357": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_845_201922-06-2019841": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_629_202009-07-2020314": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_119_202013-02-2020322": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_880_202004-09-2020872": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_23_202125-01-2021941": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_345_202105-04-2021148": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1900_201926-11-2019594": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_782_202014-08-202076": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_381_202018-05-2020704": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_225_202027-02-2020139": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_460_202002-06-2020593": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1189_202009-11-2020325": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_187_202112-03-2021379": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_767_201928-05-20191036": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1780_201926-11-2019582": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_929_202003-10-2020665": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_508_202014-09-20202192": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_847_201906-06-2019912": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1265_201905-09-20191633": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_652_202019-11-20201416": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_53_202122-01-20212985": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1027_202007-10-2020647": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_214_202106-04-20211287": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_250_202004-03-202077": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1512_201901-11-20191000": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2020_201920-12-201996": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_875_201903-07-2019739": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1940_201904-12-2019437": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_161_202019-02-2020248": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_964_202009-10-2020605": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_225_202112-04-20211212": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1267_201919-09-20191290": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_371_202018-05-2020699": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_464_202031-08-20202333": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_611_202029-10-20201622": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_599_202018-06-2020485": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_362_202016-07-20201007": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1171_202005-11-2020373": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_145_202025-02-2020178": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_24_202004-02-2020480": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1506_201920-09-20191257": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1545_201921-09-20191218": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1141_201914-08-2019218": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_173_202119-03-20211610": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1218_202005-12-2020184": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2125_201904-02-2020472": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_786_201929-05-20191014": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_930_201901-08-2019362": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1194_202005-11-2020375": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_840_201926-06-2019813": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_804_202004-09-2020866": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2122_201905-02-2020443": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1372_201902-09-20191813": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1991_201907-12-2019384": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1297_201928-08-201955": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1359_201904-09-20191711": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1541_201921-09-20191217": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1740_201929-11-2019467": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_857_201914-06-2019877": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1211_201928-08-201949": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_698_202014-12-20201075": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1166_202002-11-2020421": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1241_201931-08-20191839": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_629_202004-11-20201560": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_453_202030-05-2020613": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1019_202012-10-2020587": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_245_202122-02-2021563": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_555_202001-10-20201993": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2047_201923-12-201927": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_214_202116-02-2021635": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1546_201921-09-20191219": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2081_201920-12-2019101": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_586_202016-06-2020506": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_271_202126-02-2021500": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_428_202018-08-2020800": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_622_202024-06-2020448": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_162_202109-02-2021698": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_459_202030-05-2020615": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1990_201917-12-2019159": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_835_202025-08-20206": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2141_201904-02-2020474": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1064_202014-10-2020550": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2005_201916-12-2019223": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1335_201929-08-201927": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_675_202025-11-20201346": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_79_202028-02-20201009": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_504_202008-06-2020550": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_891_202013-10-2020566": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1062_202020-10-2020482": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_44_202120-01-20213072": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1507_201921-09-20191209": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1962_201906-12-2019406": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_867_202031-08-2020930": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1353_201931-08-20191849": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_350_202016-05-2020709": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2117_201922-01-2020625": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_211_202119-02-2021590": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_813_201904-06-2019922": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_199_202101-04-20211415": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_704_202016-12-20201054": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1229_201928-08-201951": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1410_201912-09-20191503": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1152_202012-11-2020285": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_592_202019-10-20201735": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_368_202016-05-2020712": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_133_202026-05-2020347": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_121_202020-05-2020366": "DENIED", + "Bail_Application_300075_201930-07-2019161": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_176_202112-02-20211065": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_113_202020-05-2020362": "DENIED", + "Bail_Application_100485_201901-10-2019519": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_488_202009-11-2020299": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_115_202012-03-202025": "DENIED", + "Bail_Application_100564_201924-10-2019392": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_353_202017-09-2020986": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_39_202107-01-20211315": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_99_202122-01-20211203": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_172_202026-05-2020145": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_406_202008-10-2020907": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_117_202129-01-20211171": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_365_202008-09-2020671": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_143_202028-05-2020329": "DENIED", + "Bail_Application_100590_201905-11-2019354": "GRANTED", + "Bail_Application_100506_201904-10-2019501": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_158_202124-02-2021426": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_93_202006-03-202037": "DENIED", + "Bail_Application_100710_201906-01-2020543": "DENIED", + "Bail_Application_100378_201921-08-201940": "DENIED", + "Bail_Application_100668_201913-12-2019126": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_15_202107-01-2021905": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_482_202002-12-2020767": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_203_202125-02-2021416": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_22_202116-01-2021807": "GRANTED", + "Bail_Application_100370_201917-08-201959": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_145_202028-05-2020331": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_269_202015-07-202074": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_82_202116-02-2021544": "GRANTED", + "Bail_Application_100706_201917-12-201945": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_166_202122-02-2021469": "GRANTED", + "Bail_Application_100443_201918-09-2019648": "GRANTED", + "Bail_Application_100183_201910-05-2019716": "GRANTED", + "Bail_Application_100722_201921-01-2020458": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_416_202005-10-2020588": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_114_202012-03-202024": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_129_202101-03-2021387": "GRANTED", + "Bail_Application_100376_201921-08-201939": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_317_202004-09-2020689": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_354_202019-09-2020967": "DENIED", + "Bail_Application_100616_201919-11-2019277": "GRANTED", + "Bail_Application_50_202024-01-2020418": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_485_202002-12-2020769": "GRANTED", + "Bail_Application_100619_201918-11-2019287": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_364_202018-09-2020647": "DENIED", + "Bail_Application_100223_201919-07-2019230": "GRANTED", + "Bail_Application_100334_201930-07-2019159": "GRANTED", + "Bail_Application_300044_201907-05-2019757": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_408_202009-10-2020897": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_277_202102-04-2021102": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_187_202116-02-20211038": "DENIED", + "Bail_Application_100603_201916-11-2019297": "DENIED", + "Bail_Application_100288_201923-07-2019205": "DENIED", + "Bail_Application_100585_201923-11-2019264": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_533_202007-12-2020128": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_464_202007-11-2020313": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_73_202013-02-2020171": "GRANTED", + "Bail_Application_100337_201901-08-2019148": "DENIED", + "Bail_Application_100551_201905-11-2019347": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_281_202123-03-2021193": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_129_202022-05-2020354": "DENIED", + "Bail_Application_100383_201921-08-201942": "DENIED", + "Bail_Application_100451_201920-09-2019621": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_241_202006-07-2020261": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_503_202007-12-2020127": "DENIED", + "Bail_Application_100669_201904-02-2020342": "DENIED", + "Bail_Application_100635_201926-11-2019255": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_405_202029-09-2020615": "GRANTED", + "Bail_Application_100415_201921-09-2019605": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_234_202116-03-2021251": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_26_202108-01-20211300": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_167_202122-02-2021470": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100_202125-01-20211193": "DENIED", + "Bail_Application_100302_201922-07-2019212": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_445_202007-11-2020849": "DENIED", + "Bail_Application_100448_201919-09-2019633": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_42_202108-01-20211303": "GRANTED", + "Bail_Application_100361_201922-08-201932": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_105_202003-03-202067": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_169_202111-02-20211071": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_396_202006-10-2020921": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_285_202010-08-2020206": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_325_202112-04-202113": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_589_202001-01-2021956": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_264_202021-07-2020229": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_543_202015-01-2021830": "DENIED", + "Bail_Application_100295_201925-07-2019193": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_95_202008-05-2020380": "DENIED", + "Bail_Application_35_202024-01-2020415": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_185_202009-06-2020295": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_153_202002-06-2020320": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_265_202009-07-202087": "DENIED", + "Bail_Application_100471_201909-10-2019479": "DENIED", + "Bail_Application_100268_201911-07-2019443": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_138_202124-02-2021425": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_143_202021-03-20204": "DENIED", + "Bail_Application_100696_201917-12-201944": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_343_202014-09-2020993": "DENIED", + "Bail_Application_100513_201927-11-2019239": "DENIED", + "Bail_Application_100601_201914-11-2019310": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_28_202007-02-2020307": "GRANTED", + "Bail_Application_700001_201916-05-2019688": "DENIED", + "Bail_Application_46_202024-01-2020417": "DENIED", + "Bail_Application_100265_201910-07-2019446": "GRANTED", + "Bail_Application_100128_201907-05-2019751": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_177_202112-02-20211066": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_451_202010-11-2020835": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_495_202010-11-2020285": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_447_202010-11-2020833": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_52_202122-01-2021739": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_95_202121-01-20211212": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_277_202006-07-202093": "GRANTED", + "Bail_Application_100455_201921-09-2019609": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_110_202106-02-2021633": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_62_202112-02-2021567": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_337_202004-09-2020693": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_476_202002-12-2020763": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8_202102-01-20211349": "DENIED", + "Bail_Application_100481_201926-09-2019571": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_93_202118-02-2021519": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_245_202008-07-2020250": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_88_202123-02-202120": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_220_202115-03-2021262": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_398_202006-10-2020923": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_159_202125-02-2021412": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_168_202122-02-2021471": "GRANTED", + "Bail_Application_100429_201913-09-2019754": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_183_202124-02-2021428": "GRANTED", + "Bail_Application_100718_201909-01-2020510": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_162_202110-02-20211077": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_130_202022-05-2020355": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_326_202112-04-202114": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_104_202018-05-2020372": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_286_202020-07-202062": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_467_202002-11-2020389": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_37_202107-01-20211314": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_106_202116-02-2021545": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_286_202010-08-2020207": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_128_202119-02-2021495": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_114_202020-05-2020363": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_249_202009-07-2020244": "DENIED", + "Bail_Application_48_202021-01-2020457": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_390_202006-10-2020917": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_175_202006-06-2020307": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_115_202127-01-20211189": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_98_202007-03-202031": "DENIED", + "Bail_Application_100516_201913-11-2019315": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3_202102-01-20211348": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_209_202118-02-20211023": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_109_202127-01-20211184": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1238_201926-09-20192435": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1239_201904-10-20192324": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1016_201916-08-2019201": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_144_202028-09-2020474": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_367_202109-04-202161": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_310_202124-03-2021190": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1822_201923-12-201923": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_249_202021-12-20208": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_700_202015-09-20201858": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_82_202119-02-20211151": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_29_202111-01-2021965": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1259_201903-10-20192344": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_231_202122-03-2021236": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_16_202102-02-2021784": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_251_202018-12-202016": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_14_202020-02-2020184": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_250_202126-02-2021496": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_355_202124-03-2021194": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1790_201917-12-201997": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_382_202124-03-2021197": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_556_202004-08-2020168": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__732_201917-06-2019904": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_85_202105-03-2021424": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_545_202001-10-20203003": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_446_202009-07-2020375": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_169_202009-10-2020443": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_178_202122-02-2021565": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__638_201927-06-2019831": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_609_202021-10-20202693": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_43_202016-06-202076": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_52_202020-02-2020187": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_58_202017-02-2020245": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_31_202101-02-2021796": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1120_201927-08-201955": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1128_202018-12-202059": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_332_202116-03-2021319": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_759_202021-10-20201479": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1076_202009-12-2020115": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1198_202011-01-2021973": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1497_201931-10-20192026": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_207_202006-11-2020340": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__765_201921-06-2019869": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_61_202112-02-20211171": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_476_202005-09-20203413": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_288_202004-07-2020415": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_629_202009-09-20201896": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__575_201909-05-20191227": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1090_202007-12-2020138": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1517_201905-11-20191973": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_328_202101-04-2021156": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1030_202004-12-2020214": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1222_201916-11-20191502": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_167_202009-10-2020441": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_26_202129-01-2021833": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__564_201903-05-20191294": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_707_202019-12-20201999": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_656_202011-11-20202433": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1626_201923-11-20191099": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_283_202029-05-2020624": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_880_202019-10-20201516": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_488_202020-08-202052": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_399_202101-04-2021159": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__630_201921-05-20191125": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_143_202104-03-20211024": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_104_202110-02-2021683": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__565_201903-05-20191295": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_247_202107-04-202198": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_221_202106-03-2021416": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_884_202020-10-20201496": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_283_202119-03-2021258": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_83_202119-02-20211152": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_216_202020-11-2020322": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_309_202123-03-2021219": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1448_201916-10-20192242": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_386_202017-06-2020493": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__668_201930-05-20191023": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_959_202007-12-2020137": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_306_202116-03-2021315": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_227_202020-05-2020661": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100_202124-02-20211107": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_372_202020-06-2020474": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_78_202007-08-202029": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_282_202029-05-2020623": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6_202102-02-2021782": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_203_202123-03-2021412": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_428_202017-07-2020293": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_91_202109-02-2021701": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_134_202115-02-2021628": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_50_202019-02-2020211": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_655_202010-09-20201882": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_374_202007-07-2020403": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_89_202014-08-202020": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1081_201919-08-2019164": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_872_202028-10-20201439": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1190_202006-01-2021998": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__847_201906-07-2019727": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__797_201902-07-2019785": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_438_202003-07-2020419": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1581_201916-11-20191505": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__467_201915-05-20191166": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_506_202024-07-2020238": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_78_202024-02-2020172": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_505_202028-07-2020216": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_228_202019-05-2020671": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_106_202027-08-2020520": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__625_201915-05-20191176": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1161_201930-08-20192911": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_693_202014-09-20201874": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__669_201915-07-2019617": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_261_202030-05-2020610": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1171_202005-01-20211003": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_46_202020-06-202071": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_140_202004-03-2020105": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_461_202127-04-202122": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_230_202020-05-2020662": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_318_202005-06-2020569": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_254_202027-05-2020636": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1270_201904-10-20192325": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_548_202019-08-202065": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_474_202017-07-2020296": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_167_202107-04-20211083": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_377_202012-06-2020522": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_171_202013-10-2020434": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1563_201915-11-20191560": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__602_201904-06-2019975": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_271_202122-03-2021238": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__754_201921-06-2019868": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_298_202120-04-202117": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_122_202102-03-20211062": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_713_202028-09-20201744": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_995_202006-11-20201315": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_89_202103-03-2021432": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_129_202102-03-20211069": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__587_201904-06-2019972": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1478_201931-10-20192024": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_250_202102-04-2021169": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__599_201929-05-20191037": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_423_202120-04-202124": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_688_202010-09-20201885": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_807_202008-10-20201646": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_21_202115-01-2021925": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_165_202122-02-2021562": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1620_201914-11-20191595": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__716_201918-06-2019892": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1200_202004-01-20211017": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1592_201911-11-20191786": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_274_202029-05-2020621": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__726_201912-06-2019942": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__770_201902-07-2019783": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1627_201907-12-2019412": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__600_201904-06-2019973": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_323_202008-06-2020551": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_261_202109-03-2021395": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_83_202017-08-202016": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_550_202003-10-20202985": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_292_202117-04-202121": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_241_202101-04-2021223": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_79_202019-02-2020215": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_762_202030-09-20201725": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1728_201930-11-2019721": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_245_202011-12-2020291": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_204_202123-03-2021413": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_411_202102-04-2021152": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_240_202008-12-2020299": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_871_202017-10-20201533": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1325_201903-10-20192349": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_113_202020-02-2020196": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1110_202015-01-2021930": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__751_201902-07-2019781": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_200_202119-03-2021254": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1160_201920-09-20192526": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_527_202004-08-2020163": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_285_202109-04-202153": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_32_202018-03-202014": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1602_201925-11-20191008": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_740_202022-09-20201791": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_274_202118-03-2021275": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_245_202125-02-2021511": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_804_202003-10-20201711": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1117_202024-12-20205": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_200_202123-03-2021409": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1203_202011-01-2021974": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1569_201906-11-20191948": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1112_202010-12-2020113": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1215_201920-09-20192528": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_186_202020-03-202013": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_381_202007-08-2020877": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_320_202126-03-2021167": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1191_202016-01-2021910": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_64_202112-02-20211174": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_192_202124-02-2021524": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1118_202019-12-202054": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_860_202015-10-20201561": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_98_202019-02-2020217": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_25_202112-01-20211261": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_477_202016-07-2020307": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_354_202106-04-2021123": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_610_202021-10-20202694": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_74_202031-07-202035": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1678_201923-11-20191105": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_486_202016-07-2020311": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_441_202122-04-202110": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__734_201927-06-2019833": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_443_202108-04-202186": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1334_201914-10-20192274": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1549_201905-11-20191975": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_180_202113-04-20211054": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_33_202019-03-20204": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_142_202103-03-20211032": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_649_202009-11-20202466": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_852_202011-11-2020681": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_896_202031-10-20201397": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1185_202006-01-2021996": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1163_202017-12-202065": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_694_202019-09-20201808": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1320_201921-09-20192509": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_287_202001-06-2020599": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_302_202003-06-2020588": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_81_202018-02-2020230": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_29_202118-01-20211255": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_283_202112-04-202141": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_184_202117-03-2021682": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__948_201902-08-2019391": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_156_202106-03-2021969": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1279_201903-10-20192346": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1345_201926-09-20192444": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_463_202023-07-2020251": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_163_202007-10-2020457": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_368_202019-06-2020479": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__789_201927-06-2019841": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__719_201910-06-2019952": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_172_202013-10-2020435": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1495_201931-10-20192025": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_46_202101-03-2021462": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1689_201904-12-2019568": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_124_202102-03-20211064": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_279_202120-03-2021244": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_142_202028-09-2020472": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_568_202017-08-2020104": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_375_202015-06-2020518": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_197_202002-12-2020264": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__505_201903-05-20191287": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__768_201926-06-2019850": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_39_202127-01-20211232": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_982_202004-11-20201354": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__741_201918-06-2019893": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_770_202006-10-20201677": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_127_202027-02-2020145": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_60_202128-01-2021845": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_232_202030-05-2020608": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1228_201911-09-20192732": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_219_202020-11-2020325": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_425_202030-06-2020434": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_111_202116-02-2021606": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_209_202011-11-2020331": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1479_201907-12-2019411": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1509_201913-11-20191649": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_20_202107-01-20211269": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__561_201908-05-20191245": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__667_201930-05-20191022": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__597_201915-05-20191174": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_459_202021-07-2020278": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__655_201910-06-2019946": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_22_202013-02-2020283": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1183_201903-09-20192845": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__682_201910-06-2019947": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_923_202020-10-20201502": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1201_202013-01-2021943": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_153_202111-02-2021658": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1129_202018-12-202060": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1656_201930-11-2019716": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__790_201928-06-2019823": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_649_202005-09-20201925": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_531_202020-08-202055": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1631_201915-11-20191564": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_420_202120-04-202122": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_215_202019-11-2020327": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_323_202116-03-2021318": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_201_202126-02-2021495": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1396_201910-10-20192310": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_51_202011-02-2020322": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_120_202014-09-2020500": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__954_201907-08-2019321": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_541_202004-08-2020166": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_218_202020-11-2020324": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_50_202103-02-2021775": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__852_201906-07-2019728": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1008_202018-12-202057": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1519_201918-11-20191424": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100_202019-03-202020": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_22_202017-03-202018": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_148_202105-03-20211017": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_115_202125-02-20211099": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_216_202020-06-2020473": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_175_202126-02-2021490": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_139_202112-03-2021346": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_145_202028-09-2020475": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1603_201925-11-20191009": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_95_202105-02-2021748": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__944_201925-07-2019533": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1082_202025-11-2020413": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_779_202003-10-20201706": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_607_202024-08-202034": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_249_202110-03-2021369": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__614_201929-05-20191038": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__688_201914-06-2019921": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_69_202012-02-2020302": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_669_202031-08-20201954": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_49_202019-02-2020210": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_814_202014-10-20201579": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_566_202017-08-2020102": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__769_201929-06-2019807": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__558_201909-05-20191225": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_667_202007-09-20201909": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_22_202115-01-2021926": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_703_202016-09-20201839": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__657_201926-06-2019847": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_364_202031-07-2020963": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1781_201923-12-201917": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_276_202119-03-2021256": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_512_202027-07-2020230": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_472_202017-07-2020294": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1767_201923-12-201916": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_473_202017-07-2020295": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_51_202024-06-202065": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_152_202105-03-20211021": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_795_202007-10-20201668": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1116_201924-08-201984": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_361_202010-06-2020537": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1573_201919-12-201967": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_575_202017-08-2020107": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_198_202120-03-2021582": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_284_202109-04-202152": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1418_201914-10-20192284": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_989_202018-11-2020480": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1433_201905-11-20191963": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_129_202021-09-2020490": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_267_202116-03-2021312": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_214_202117-03-2021293": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1158_202016-12-202076": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1778_201916-12-2019154": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_80_202012-08-202026": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_151_202029-09-2020467": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_419_202108-04-202185": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_113_202125-02-20211097": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_109_202020-02-2020194": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__759_201918-06-2019894": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__733_201917-06-2019905": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_336_202011-06-2020523": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1447_201906-11-20191938": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_991_202004-12-2020213": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1110_201924-08-201982": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_302_202110-03-2021371": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_41_202116-01-2021909": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1080_202004-12-2020217": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1351_202023-07-2020404": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1846_202003-09-20201282": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2559_201902-12-2019425": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1703_201926-08-201974": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2362_201909-12-2019274": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_647_202105-04-2021104": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2504_202011-11-2020470": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_809_202125-03-2021221": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_935_202010-07-2020578": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1764_202026-08-202014": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1828_202002-09-20201300": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2365_202003-11-2020537": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1988_202024-09-20201023": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2416_202025-11-2020330": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1029_202116-04-202128": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2064_202008-10-2020846": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1785_202030-09-2020948": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2594_201906-12-2019332": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_906_202016-06-2020867": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_609_202002-06-20201080": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2334_202021-10-2020693": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1006_202023-06-2020799": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2654_202017-12-2020110": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_402_202018-03-202021": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1393_202002-12-20201631": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_228_202004-03-2020127": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1125_202008-07-2020637": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_770_202018-06-2020819": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1624_202024-08-202059": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2142_202008-10-2020853": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1914_202017-09-20201121": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_219_202005-06-20201011": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2424_202009-11-2020483": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1039_202006-07-2020664": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2181_202012-10-2020826": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2238_202013-10-2020802": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1280_202011-11-20201755": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1947_202025-09-2020995": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_133_202006-02-2020599": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1385_202002-12-20201624": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_92_202002-01-20201244": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2410_202003-11-2020543": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1096_202003-07-2020695": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2020_202019-09-20201103": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2355_202023-11-2020370": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_849_202017-06-2020839": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_635_202003-06-20201066": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1229_202016-07-2020517": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_359_202005-03-2020111": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_251_202003-03-2020147": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_147_202003-02-2020669": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2296_202018-11-2020419": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1230_202016-07-2020518": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3_202013-12-2019208": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1096_201920-06-2019913": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1454_202018-12-20201454": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_657_202002-06-20201083": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2351_202002-11-2020558": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_266_202017-01-2020952": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2045_202006-10-2020866": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_209_202021-01-2020900": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_76_202008-01-20201078": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_256_202005-03-2020105": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2004_202023-09-20201038": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_918_202116-04-202114": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2491_202017-11-2020438": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_859_202001-07-2020721": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1391_202002-12-20201629": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_778_202008-06-2020984": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1436_202007-09-20201224": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1985_202024-09-20201022": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_658_202101-04-2021168": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_929_202103-04-2021137": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1284_202021-07-2020436": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1583_201931-07-2019419": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1058_201904-06-2019959": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1605_201909-08-2019300": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_115_202017-01-2020949": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_616_202030-05-20201108": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1540_201926-08-201967": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_782_202008-06-2020985": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1638_202027-08-20201357": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2021_202019-09-20201104": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1554_201914-08-2019257": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1490_201913-08-2019270": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_228_202021-01-2020901": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1382_202002-12-20201621": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1631_202028-08-20201332": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_870_202012-06-2020894": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_867_201916-05-20191120": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1361_202020-07-2020477": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_821_202016-06-2020859": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2044_202006-10-2020865": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2097_202003-10-2020915": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_941_201921-05-20191073": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_998_201917-05-20191111": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1559_202005-08-2020289": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1955_202019-09-20201099": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1704_202024-08-202067": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1937_202017-09-20201128": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_295_202017-02-2020335": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1860_202008-09-20201211": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2307_202023-10-2020649": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1173_202020-07-2020458": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_918_202018-06-2020828": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1370_202021-07-2020447": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_253_202005-03-2020103": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2390_202006-11-2020510": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1464_202028-07-2020375": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1526_201908-08-2019327": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1419_202007-08-2020256": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1053_202106-04-202192": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_341_202011-02-2020433": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1863_202001-09-20201307": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1843_202028-08-20201347": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1614_201927-08-201949": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1887_202017-09-20201116": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2463_202002-11-2020571": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2245_202017-10-2020745": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2548_202023-11-2020374": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1305_202017-11-20201732": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1074_202006-07-2020666": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_607_202001-06-20201095": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1515_201909-08-2019294": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_686_202102-04-2021147": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1441_202012-08-2020224": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1207_202003-07-2020699": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_769_202009-06-2020955": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2652_202018-12-202085": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1287_202011-11-20201762": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_94_202003-01-20201210": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2578_201904-12-2019383": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2661_201917-12-2019125": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1246_202020-07-2020465": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1408_202005-12-20201582": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_418_202002-06-20201074": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1651_202020-08-2020116": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_490_202010-06-2020918": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1367_202022-07-2020425": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2040_202001-10-2020928": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2745_202021-12-202054": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2267_201930-11-2019440": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2019_202019-09-20201102": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1466_202007-08-2020260": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_173_202003-03-2020142": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2165_202013-10-2020794": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_334_202005-03-2020109": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2527_202019-12-202067": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1810_202011-09-20201171": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1435_202004-08-2020295": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2587_202004-12-2020253": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1008_202116-04-202125": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1627_202002-09-20201288": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1952_202019-09-20201098": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1422_201921-08-2019122": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1949_202011-09-20201196": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1412_202030-07-2020336": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_535_202101-04-2021167": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_566_202018-06-2020814": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1046_201901-07-2019828": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1648_202025-08-202033": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1562_201906-08-2019349": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1987_202030-09-2020955": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_391_202027-02-2020199": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2736_202010-12-2020186": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_383_202003-03-2020154": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1700_201927-08-201954": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1824_201929-08-201924": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2649_201917-12-2019122": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1877_202007-09-20201253": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1488_202017-08-2020166": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1902_202022-09-20201054": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2285_202023-10-2020647": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1492_202017-08-2020167": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1954_202023-11-2020368": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2832_202023-12-202021": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1487_202012-08-2020227": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1665_202026-08-20207": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2083_201905-12-2019347": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2678_202007-12-2020223": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_696_202124-03-2021251": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_788_202124-03-2021254": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1555_202017-08-2020173": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2041_202001-10-2020929": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2145_202007-10-2020859": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_590_202030-05-20201104": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_927_202002-07-2020707": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_890_202116-04-202111": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2632_202001-12-2020300": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_28_202029-02-2020167": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1307_202030-07-2020330": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1383_202002-12-20201622": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2081_202012-10-2020807": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2687_201921-12-201935": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1632_202025-08-202029": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2520_202021-11-2020386": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2022_202019-09-20201105": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_729_202029-05-20201126": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_679_202008-06-2020971": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1577_202021-08-202082": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1431_202030-07-2020340": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_632_202004-06-20201048": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1421_201911-07-2019734": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2496_202019-11-2020411": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1336_202030-07-2020333": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_280_202027-01-2020787": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_943_201918-05-20191097": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2481_202006-11-2020521": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2362_202023-10-2020655": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2039_202030-09-2020964": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_152_202028-01-2020760": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2346_202002-11-2020556": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1215_202029-10-20201902": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1682_202002-09-20201289": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_676_202125-03-2021214": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1018_202016-07-2020504": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1973_202019-09-20201100": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_517_202126-03-2021187": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1535_202006-08-2020279": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1497_202007-08-2020262": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2333_202020-10-2020711": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2434_202011-11-2020460": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_912_202014-07-2020550": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1009_202030-06-2020756": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1311_201928-06-2019856": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1938_202024-09-20201017": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1773_202002-09-20201298": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1999_202023-09-20201037": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_963_202116-04-202123": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2173_202015-10-2020768": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_289_202101-04-2021165": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_183_202005-02-2020627": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2210_202013-10-2020800": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1477_202010-08-2020241": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2063_202003-10-2020910": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2311_202022-10-2020674": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2203_202028-10-2020621": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_69_202007-01-20201116": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1090_202003-07-2020694": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1622_202008-09-20201206": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2604_202025-11-2020341": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1833_202008-09-20201210": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1416_202017-08-2020164": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_112_202011-02-2020445": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_267_202022-01-2020863": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_99_202006-01-20201147": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2192_202012-10-2020828": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1180_202016-07-2020510": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1456_201917-08-2019206": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1855_202007-09-20201246": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1359_202021-07-2020446": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_606_202008-06-2020967": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_716_202125-03-2021216": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_269_202024-01-2020811": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_911_202026-06-2020764": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1088_202003-11-20201841": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4305_202002-11-20201702": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3170_201926-06-20192673": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2675_201931-05-20193079": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2147_201907-05-20193863": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2113_201906-05-20193919": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5629_201925-09-20192501": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4364_201916-08-2019882": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1867_202118-03-20211248": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5038_202027-11-20201147": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_770_202112-03-20211585": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4994_201920-09-20192675": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4717_201926-08-2019347": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5625_201919-09-20192765": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1098_202003-07-20201713": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_99_202017-01-20201618": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4381_202023-10-20201908": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1933_202007-08-2020555": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3497_202007-10-20202611": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6341_201931-10-20191587": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_127_202021-01-20201488": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5000_202004-12-2020938": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2164_202131-03-2021764": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5046_201909-09-20193251": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4541_202024-11-20201219": "GRANTED", + "Bail_189_202013-07-20202141": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1992_201901-05-20194105": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4903_201909-09-20193246": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_442_202007-02-20201063": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3735_201923-07-20191520": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2874_201903-07-20192435": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4019_202009-10-20202519": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_524_202109-03-20211755": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5271_202016-12-2020240": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4937_202002-12-20201056": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1815_202021-07-20201148": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1494_202028-07-2020819": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1397_202110-03-20211708": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2448_202021-08-2020251": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2141_202122-03-20211117": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1578_202118-03-20211214": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2240_201914-05-20193686": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_944_202024-07-2020936": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2492_201903-06-20193058": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5781_201905-11-20191493": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2128_202107-04-2021391": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3850_202007-10-20202628": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3329_202008-10-20202551": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_811_202013-03-2020177": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1832_201902-05-20194032": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2095_202005-08-2020668": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1223_202108-03-20211870": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3996_201927-08-2019121": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3096_201919-06-20192847": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3788_201915-07-20191854": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4680_201916-08-2019910": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1182_202112-03-20211595": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7419_201912-12-2019590": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3908_202020-10-20202014": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2358_202103-04-2021566": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_668_202005-03-2020318": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1164_202020-07-20201188": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5176_202004-12-2020964": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1383_202112-03-20211613": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1134_202006-07-20201649": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1673_202116-03-20211473": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2980_201920-06-20192822": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2299_201920-05-20193496": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2099_201929-05-20193164": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3650_202017-10-20202216": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_975_202125-03-2021882": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4136_202021-10-20201975": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1103_202023-07-2020990": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4023_202029-10-20201788": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_696_202005-03-2020320": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3989_201920-08-2019672": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1555_202024-07-2020945": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2265_202005-08-2020680": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6317_201922-11-2019915": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5935_201915-10-20192044": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_365_202028-07-2020811": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5295_202014-12-2020390": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5362_202017-12-2020179": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3295_201928-06-20192604": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1954_202125-03-2021916": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4524_201916-08-2019901": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2561_202105-04-2021545": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_420_202022-06-20201929": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_376_202024-02-2020636": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2038_202018-08-2020406": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2683_202025-08-2020113": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2429_202107-04-2021425": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4434_201906-09-20193318": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3766_202009-11-20201523": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1260_202007-08-2020543": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4755_201922-08-2019503": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4856_202023-11-20201308": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3414_201909-07-20192216": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5586_201926-09-20192445": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1767_202021-07-20201141": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2491_202021-08-2020257": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5207_201911-09-20193212": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3125_202030-09-20202781": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2459_201924-05-20193375": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1919_202122-03-20211101": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3792_202016-10-20202242": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_247_202031-01-20201277": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3221_201902-07-20192490": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2773_202115-04-2021138": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4652_201920-08-2019699": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3737_201925-07-20191417": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6820_201914-11-20191315": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1471_202007-07-20201624": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4828_201926-11-2019830": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1906_202118-03-20211252": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6504_201926-11-2019844": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1809_202125-03-2021903": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4919_201928-08-201987": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2255_202108-04-2021316": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1790_202016-07-20201311": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4387_201916-08-2019887": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4776_201917-09-20192823": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3537_201925-07-20191416": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2054_202131-03-2021750": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2245_202007-08-2020567": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2035_201901-05-20194113": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3761_202005-10-20202732": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2343_201907-06-20192942": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1904_202025-08-202076": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5370_202011-12-2020782": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4620_201930-08-20193645": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2090_202031-07-2020740": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3625_202012-10-20202444": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1821_201922-05-20193426": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3429_202008-10-20202555": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7527_201923-12-201935": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5518_201919-09-20192760": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6183_201931-10-20191577": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3485_201916-07-20191790": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2174_202031-07-2020744": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5091_201909-09-20193253": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1814_202021-07-20201147": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1445_202110-03-20211714": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1353_202109-03-20211789": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4169_201931-07-20191317": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2800_202006-08-2020637": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4718_201919-09-20192725": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2005_202024-07-2020965": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2102_202101-04-2021628": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4741_201920-08-2019701": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2249_201906-05-20193930": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5041_202002-12-20201064": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4030_201921-08-2019567": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1824_202024-07-2020956": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1491_202109-03-20211807": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_665_202008-07-20201561": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4823_202023-11-20201303": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3158_201924-06-20192740": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2167_202018-08-2020411": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2349_202013-08-2020500": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2429_202005-08-2020692": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3367_201920-08-2019666": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5111_201913-09-20193136": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5989_201909-10-20192164": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1963_202117-03-20211356": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_994_202117-03-20211286": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2029_202131-03-2021746": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1760_202028-07-2020824": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100157_201917-06-20192879": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7205_201918-12-2019113": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1166_202003-07-20201718": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4582_202003-11-20201678": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_633_202015-07-20201316": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5612_201916-10-20191975": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1556_202118-03-20211209": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2291_202024-08-2020163": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1430_202002-07-20201785": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5425_202016-12-2020255": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_115_202004-03-2020347": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2235_202027-07-2020904": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6058_201905-11-20191498": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3389_202030-09-20202789": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5208_202014-12-2020380": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1351_202030-06-20201861": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4182_202001-12-20201094": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5199_202015-12-2020303": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4518_201924-08-2019414": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_395_202004-03-2020359": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5032_202017-12-2020162": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1987_201902-05-20194043": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2042_201903-05-20193988": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7406_201910-01-20201784": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4099_201908-08-20191089": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1578_202016-07-20201296": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_628_202005-03-2020315": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5127_202001-12-20201113": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1782_202117-03-20211345": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1725_202022-07-20201090": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7668_201907-01-20201912": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7498_201917-01-20201637": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_465_202006-03-2020216": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1985_201902-05-20194041": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2741_202115-04-2021132": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2226_201913-05-20193727": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4547_202021-11-20201337": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5873_201930-10-20191625": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_432_202007-02-20201061": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2277_201914-05-20193695": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1212_202017-07-20201223": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3516_202014-10-20202339": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4446_202018-11-20201397": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2343_202021-08-2020241": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5905_201903-10-20192247": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5088_201906-09-20193339": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5264_201915-10-20192035": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_80_202020-01-20201537": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2279_201907-05-20193867": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_12_202004-02-20201185": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2450_201929-05-20193173": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2657_201911-07-20192111": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4539_201916-08-2019902": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4525_201924-08-2019415": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1666_202116-03-20211468": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5438_201914-10-20192070": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1549_202118-03-20211207": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3872_202021-10-20201960": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2045_202125-03-2021925": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_780_202024-06-20201924": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3464_201915-07-20191834": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7478_201917-01-20201636": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6575_201905-11-20191518": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4434_202028-10-20201850": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2089_202031-07-2020739": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_233_202016-07-20201263": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1635_202122-03-20211086": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4025_202029-10-20201789": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2548_201906-06-20192977": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2190_202116-04-202143": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2454_201929-05-20193175": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4013_202019-10-20202051": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5855_201917-10-20191937": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2154_202019-08-2020370": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_160_202026-02-2020539": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1511_202015-07-20201331": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5369_201918-09-20192799": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1446_202110-03-20211715": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3895_202021-10-20201961": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5232_202015-12-2020307": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1192_202118-03-20211196": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7505_201923-12-201933": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6654_201915-11-20191220": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3094_201924-06-20192735": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4043_201909-08-20191042": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5767_201927-09-20192412": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2013_202013-08-2020488": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3924_201902-08-20191251": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2004_202021-08-2020222": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1339_202030-06-20201856": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2393_202112-04-2021226": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4077_202013-10-20202413": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6138_201918-10-20191899": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_351_202003-03-2020412": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1256_202117-03-20211296": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5139_202002-12-20201072": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5955_201909-10-20192154": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1973_202026-08-202018": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3794_202009-10-20202510": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2208_201923-05-20193399": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3721_201909-07-20192235": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4076_202012-10-20202465": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3538_201911-07-20192127": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3828_202015-10-20202290": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4662_201909-08-20191061": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2811_202115-04-2021142": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1514_202020-08-2020304": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4090_201931-07-20191316": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_374_202003-02-20201219": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5020_202024-11-20201251": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2100_202105-04-2021505": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3478_202005-10-20202719": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1481_202110-03-20211724": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5360_202014-12-2020401": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5385_201925-10-20191681": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4373_201929-08-201927": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5257_202009-12-2020838": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7068_201913-12-2019557": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2476_201930-05-20193115": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4096_202001-12-20201092": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2810_202113-04-2021197": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_546_202018-03-202088": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4624_201924-08-2019418": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3636_201918-07-20191687": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6253_201906-11-20191444": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2483_202113-04-2021165": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5213_202017-12-2020170": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2333_202025-08-202096": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4299_201907-08-20191143": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4579_202011-11-20201466": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4576_201913-08-2019994": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1461_202001-07-20201838": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2149_201908-05-20193827": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1976_202123-03-20211033": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2384_202113-04-2021160": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7720_201914-01-20201732": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2007_202123-03-20211042": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2101_202020-08-2020311": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2200_202105-04-2021511": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4231_201906-08-20191180": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4521_201904-09-20193407": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_310_202013-03-2020148": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4765_202017-12-2020158": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1830_202117-03-20211352": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5327_202015-12-2020315": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1920_201908-05-20193819": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2223_201909-05-20193782": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2013_202115-04-202190": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3320_202030-09-20202786": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4822_201911-09-20193199": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_600_202005-08-20202066": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4152_201907-08-20191127": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3575_201918-07-20191677": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2344_202108-04-2021320": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4734_202002-12-20201051": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1898_202025-08-202075": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2343_202102-04-2021592": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7228_201916-12-2019216": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1190_202010-07-20201456": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3671_201915-07-20191845": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1861_202115-03-20211562": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3679_202020-10-20202006": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3364_202030-09-20202788": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4002_201930-08-20193641": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2630_202112-04-2021252": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4542_201927-08-2019128": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1998_202123-03-20211040": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1199_202026-06-20201897": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3678_202006-10-20202671": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5766_201925-09-20192506": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2484_202113-04-2021166": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4646_201917-08-2019851": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5939_201927-09-20192420": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_456_202006-02-20201098": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4931_202016-12-2020221": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2069_201915-05-20193618": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3760_202008-10-20202567": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5523_202023-12-202055": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_793_202013-07-20201409": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2151_202024-08-2020155": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4032_201909-08-20191039": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1407_202002-07-20201783": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_349_202025-02-2020599": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3603_202009-10-20202501": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3557_201927-07-20191369": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6737_201918-11-20191130": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6083_201915-11-20191195": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3435_201905-07-20192354": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3949_201931-07-20191308": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4933_202001-12-20201104": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3474_201916-07-20191787": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4449_201903-10-20192215": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4103_202003-11-20201658": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3368_202009-10-20202491": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3172_201924-06-20192743": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5780_201905-11-20191492": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3456_201904-07-20192401": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6271_201905-03-2020268": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5031_201905-09-20193373": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2752_202115-04-2021136": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4587_202009-11-20201546": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1646_202024-07-2020947": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3755_201915-07-20191850": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1290_202108-03-20211875": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_369_202019-02-2020718": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3768_201911-07-20192138": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_505_202005-03-2020310": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2685_202021-08-2020290": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2286_202024-08-2020161": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1655_202116-03-20211461": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_410_202003-03-2020392": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4730_202002-12-20201050": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3668_201918-07-20191688": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1196_202109-03-20211771": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4162_201923-07-20191537": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3550_202012-10-20202442": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2680_202113-04-2021177": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4134_202022-10-20201931": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1244_202029-06-20201875": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3994_201922-07-20191570": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5263_201919-09-20192737": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1152_202024-08-2020139": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3206_201928-06-20192599": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3758_202019-10-20202043": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_854_202010-07-20201448": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4049_202007-12-2020879": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4350_201929-08-201926": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1426_202112-03-20211616": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3780_201915-07-20191852": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5145_201906-09-20193345": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3957_202013-10-20202410": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5312_201917-09-20192849": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3617_202016-10-20202235": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1895_202019-08-2020357": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3682_202013-10-20202391": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3173_201926-06-20192675": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1839_202118-03-20211240": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2277_202006-08-2020626": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4528_202024-11-20201218": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2280_202024-08-2020160": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1669_202116-03-20211471": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_773_202016-07-20201274": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4277_202014-12-2020352": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1423_202106-03-20211904": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2581_202026-08-202033": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4082_202015-12-2020279": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2111_202131-03-2021757": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5316_202024-12-202016": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7001_201903-01-20201995": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5205_201927-09-20192392": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5403_201930-09-20192314": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5800_201930-09-20192334": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5189_201919-09-20192730": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2750_201903-07-20192432": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1349_202116-03-20211425": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5356_201919-09-20192745": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5202_201911-09-20193211": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2806_202116-04-202184": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4759_202009-12-2020816": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4160_202002-11-20201692": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6581_201922-11-2019919": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2504_202021-08-2020261": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2043_201903-05-20193989": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3716_202007-10-20202617": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3530_202020-10-20202003": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5850_201926-11-2019835": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1194_202108-03-20211868": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3438_201903-07-20192448": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4320_201926-08-2019331": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5293_201918-09-20192794": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2228_201921-05-20193464": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6433_201905-11-20191508": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1401_202003-07-20201736": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7572_201906-01-20201959": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2797_201910-06-20192920": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3987_202029-10-20201785": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1082_202003-07-20201711": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1484_202105-04-2021489": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3230_202009-10-20202489": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5958_201909-10-20192157": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2439_201930-05-20193111": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1198_202006-07-20201653": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4790_202019-11-20201388": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2452_201911-06-20192903": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2245_201923-05-20193401": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5484_201919-09-20192757": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1603_202117-03-20211318": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2297_202112-04-2021216": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6224_201924-10-20191789": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3620_201931-07-20191302": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2282_201918-05-20193529": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2108_201901-05-20194116": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4705_202011-11-20201475": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1404_202115-02-20212135": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_98_202021-01-20201482": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5815_201906-11-20191431": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2069_202103-04-2021564": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4686_202025-11-20201183": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3288_201904-07-20192390": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1816_202021-07-20201149": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_748_202117-03-20211281": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1616_202112-03-20211633": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1413_202020-08-2020302": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3672_201917-07-20191736": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4092_201920-08-2019674": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3819_202007-10-20202625": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7218_201905-12-2019639": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5159_202017-12-2020168": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5332_201920-09-20192688": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5150_201925-09-20192488": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1249_202109-03-20211777": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4723_201922-08-2019500": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4147_202003-11-20201661": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_839_202016-07-20201275": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2538_202021-08-2020273": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3783_201925-07-20191422": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3812_201923-07-20191523": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3874_202024-12-20205": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4813_202016-12-2020218": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6261_201931-10-20191585": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5915_201930-09-20192349": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5210_201927-09-20192394": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1194_202008-07-20201578": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7528_201924-12-201921": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4273_201916-08-2019877": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1064_202115-03-20211518": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4165_202020-10-20202024": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5673_201903-10-20192232": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1525_202019-08-2020349": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2334_201914-05-20193697": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7326_201901-01-20202113": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1354_202122-03-20211072": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4310_201902-08-20191266": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1861_202115-03-20211558": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3829_202019-10-20202045": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101_202021-01-20201483": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3196_202008-10-20202548": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2304_202105-04-2021517": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4644_202016-12-2020215": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1964_202117-03-20211357": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4267_201921-08-2019573": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3005_201911-07-20192112": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5823_201917-10-20191936": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2897_202119-04-202123": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4137_202012-11-20201419": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6893_201918-11-20191145": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2506_201928-05-20193238": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_143_202007-02-20201050": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6290_201922-11-2019913": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6300_201921-11-2019978": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1110_202022-07-20201067": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6877_201926-11-2019850": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1924_202101-04-2021619": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3837_201925-07-20191425": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_569_202027-07-2020860": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1919_201909-05-20193758": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2191_201913-05-20193724": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5126_202004-12-2020954": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2251_202130-03-2021796": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2305_202115-04-202197": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2693_201925-06-20192693": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6088_201925-10-20191697": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6293_201913-12-2019547": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4569_202009-11-20201542": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2989_201924-06-20192724": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4860_201928-08-201985": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4383_202028-10-20201844": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4147_202003-11-20201659": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6784_201914-11-20191310": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5023_201916-09-20192897": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4122_201922-07-20191575": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1878_202017-07-20201258": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4681_201927-08-2019132": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5027_202007-12-2020893": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3964_202009-10-20202518": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2155_202131-03-2021762": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3333_202006-10-20202654": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1637_202010-07-20201472": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2389_201924-05-20193371": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2471_201930-05-20193113": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2258_201904-05-20193960": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1413_202105-03-20212038": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5537_201927-09-20192402": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_706_202030-07-2020758": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5684_201916-10-20191978": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2268_202021-08-2020236": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5978_201909-10-20192159": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2903_201920-06-20192810": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7089_201903-01-20201998": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_381_202006-02-20201095": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7595_201927-01-20201389": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3521_202023-10-20201888": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3898_201909-08-20191030": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5987_201918-12-2019105": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3592_202005-10-20202726": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1080_202017-07-20201221": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1929_202123-03-20211030": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5540_202024-12-202019": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4278_202023-10-20201903": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4474_202019-11-20201368": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5163_201918-10-20191880": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2257_201915-05-20193628": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2831_202116-04-202186": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7015_201920-11-20191081": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6781_201911-11-20191395": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4634_201920-08-2019695": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2025_201906-05-20193909": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4471_202002-11-20201714": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3742_202016-10-20202240": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7704_201924-12-201925": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1126_202108-03-20211854": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1807_202120-03-20211147": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3277_201903-07-20192444": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5988_201901-10-20192290": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2299_202024-08-2020164": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6626_201920-11-20191054": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_635_202005-03-2020317": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2005_202117-03-20211367": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6506_201905-11-20191511": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2001_202105-04-2021502": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4020_202011-11-20201449": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4438_201921-08-2019578": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4400_201906-08-20191184": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2125_202107-04-2021390": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2234_202106-04-2021467": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100167_201911-07-20192139": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3402_201917-07-20191727": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_466_202004-02-20201174": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4097_202004-11-20201607": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3700_201922-07-20191563": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5215_201925-09-20192489": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5204_201923-09-20192594": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_283_202028-02-2020472": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2779_201906-06-20192993": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3354_201924-07-20191454": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4873_201927-08-2019143": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4501_202030-10-20201757": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7610_201921-01-20201507": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5382_202015-12-2020321": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6435_201930-10-20191645": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2185_201909-05-20193773": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4885_202001-12-20201101": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1892_201901-05-20194097": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5148_202003-12-20201028": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_276_202003-02-20201211": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1479_202018-08-2020397": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_45_202025-02-2020581": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5147_202003-12-20201027": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4378_202007-12-2020880": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4895_202009-12-2020819": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1300_202112-03-20211602": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4331_202011-11-20201457": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1521_202016-07-20201292": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_51_202017-01-20201613": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4531_201921-08-2019583": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1462_202007-07-20201620": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_247_202027-02-2020502": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1044_202023-07-2020989": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_478_202020-07-20202126": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_99_202019-02-2020694": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6473_201911-11-20191370": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5477_201924-10-20191764": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4545_201927-08-2019129": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1620_202116-03-20211448": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3488_202006-10-20202659": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3939_202012-10-20202459": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2532_201923-05-20193410": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3737_202012-10-20202448": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5130_202011-12-2020756": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1275_202024-07-2020940": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4289_201907-08-20191140": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5513_201917-09-20192864": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5252_202015-12-2020311": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2641_201903-06-20193063": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3486_202022-10-20201918": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1679_202023-07-20201007": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1559_202110-03-20211733": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2896_201903-07-20192436": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4069_202020-10-20202020": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2740_202115-04-2021124": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1992_202123-03-20211038": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6267_201917-12-2019147": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3081_201919-06-20192846": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5345_202014-12-2020398": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1873_202024-07-2020958": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1433_202023-07-2020993": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3848_201918-07-20191694": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2365_201922-05-20193435": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1424_202112-03-20211615": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2072_201906-05-20193915": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2291_201909-05-20193790": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2072_202125-03-2021930": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2450_202025-08-2020101": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2270_201923-05-20193402": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1242_202115-03-20211532": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4588_202009-11-20201547": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6487_201930-10-20191648": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6928_201920-11-20191073": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3940_201931-07-20191307": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1466_202007-07-20201622": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_37_202031-01-20201269": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6219_201924-10-20191787": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2320_201911-06-20192902": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2265_201909-05-20193785": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4405_202028-10-20201848": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1471_202109-03-20211806": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_331_202001-02-20201245": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5343_202014-12-2020397": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2233_202021-08-2020233": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5421_201917-09-20192854": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2564_202024-08-2020176": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2181_201917-05-20193561": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2632_202113-04-2021172": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1538_202125-03-2021890": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1309_202029-06-20201878": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3637_201924-07-20191461": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2873_201903-07-20192434": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1359_202109-03-20211790": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6045_201914-10-20192080": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4796_202004-12-2020927": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_360_202031-01-20201289": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3652_201922-07-20191561": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3809_201915-07-20191856": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2468_201930-05-20193112": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2497_202107-04-2021431": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2416_201917-05-20193584": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_399_202003-03-2020390": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3732_201920-07-20191600": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5893_201903-10-20192245": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5491_201917-09-20192860": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3457_201903-07-20192449": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2993_201924-06-20192725": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4610_201918-09-20192779": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102_202014-01-20201711": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5368_202017-12-2020180": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4222_201919-08-2019799": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3587_201923-07-20191514": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3306_202006-10-20202652": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1179_202026-06-20201895": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1683_202005-08-2020661": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4185_201924-07-20191490": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_704_202020-08-2020298": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4165_201907-08-20191130": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1370_202108-03-20211882": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1275_202112-03-20211598": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1283_202110-03-20211691": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1991_201901-05-20194104": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6436_201911-11-20191369": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2380_202116-04-202149": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3280_201904-07-20192388": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4170_202002-11-20201693": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1473_202023-07-2020994": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2607_202025-08-2020110": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4403_201921-08-2019576": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5487_201920-09-20192697": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3265_201902-07-20192496": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1805_202028-07-2020827": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2494_201927-05-20193294": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_381_202006-03-2020228": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5482_201919-09-20192756": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7654_201902-01-20202085": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2253_202130-03-2021798": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100258_201904-01-20201977": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5541_202021-12-202095": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1725_202117-03-20211326": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3621_202013-10-20202386": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5420_202016-12-2020254": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4808_202023-11-20201300": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5151_202004-12-2020957": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_747_202021-08-2020210": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1537_202023-07-2020998": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1385_202013-08-2020465": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_392_202028-07-2020813": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7321_201924-12-201916": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5825_201915-11-20191193": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2687_201926-06-20192649": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2967_201924-06-20192723": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1861_202115-03-20211560": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3825_202020-10-20202010": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5547_202021-12-202096": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_882_202109-03-20211760": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1184_202110-03-20211679": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5959_201903-10-20192255": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_491_202004-02-20201178": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6420_201906-11-20191450": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2179_202126-03-2021841": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2768_202026-08-202046": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1686_202013-07-20201424": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6324_201925-10-20191713": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3401_202007-10-20202609": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3937_202016-10-20202253": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5072_202016-12-2020229": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4224_201919-08-2019800": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1963_202031-07-2020727": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3775_201924-07-20191468": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5103_201930-09-20192306": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1519_202126-03-2021834": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2399_202026-08-202022": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1475_202021-08-2020216": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3232_201903-07-20192442": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1124_202115-03-20211521": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4571_202024-11-20201222": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4832_202004-12-2020928": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3790_202006-10-20202678": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1729_202031-07-2020720": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3889_202016-10-20202248": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2772_202122-04-20211": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4864_202018-12-2020114": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3305_202006-10-20202651": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3680_202014-10-20202345": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_323_202003-03-2020407": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2032_202005-08-2020665": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3411_201903-07-20192445": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4083_202023-10-20201898": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3614_202014-10-20202340": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2127_201910-06-20192911": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1991_202028-07-2020834": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5569_201910-10-20192119": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3951_202015-10-20202300": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4323_201916-08-2019880": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3556_201918-07-20191673": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1358_202112-03-20211611": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4573_202007-11-20201568": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6078_201918-10-20191895": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2116_201914-05-20193674": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3823_202003-12-2020978": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2050_202018-08-2020408": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2079_202006-08-2020613": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3983_202028-10-20201827": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3853_202019-10-20202046": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4853_201903-09-20193450": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4530_201920-08-2019690": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1965_202118-03-20211253": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_414_202008-07-20202150": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5144_201906-09-20193344": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3986_201907-08-20191122": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3592_201914-08-2019921": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5921_201914-10-20192074": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2074_201917-05-20193555": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_810_202013-03-2020176": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_77_202005-02-20201123": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4886_202024-11-20201245": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1326_202112-03-20211608": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5528_201918-09-20192804": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2220_202019-08-2020373": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5118_201906-09-20193340": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3706_201922-07-20191564": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4067_202024-11-20201200": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2737_202026-08-202042": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4058_201925-07-20191430": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2458_201927-05-20193290": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2734_202026-08-202040": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1993_201901-05-20194106": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1101_202108-03-20211851": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4770_201928-08-201982": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3662_201927-07-20191373": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3921_201920-08-2019671": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5599_202023-12-202059": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3743_201923-07-20191521": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4371_202005-11-20201585": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4430_201922-08-2019487": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_18_202006-02-20201110": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2488_201924-06-20192713": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1560_202118-03-20211210": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2421_201927-05-20193287": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2697_201904-06-20193033": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1535_202019-08-2020350": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4057_202010-11-20201491": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1133_202002-07-20201773": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5010_202014-12-2020366": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1219_202001-07-20201821": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_967_202024-08-2020138": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2560_202105-04-2021544": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4447_201929-08-201930": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1181_202115-03-20211526": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5416_202016-12-2020252": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1382_202014-07-20201367": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2051_202019-08-2020362": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_116_202011-02-2020890": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_96_202118-01-20211979": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_869_202018-12-2020822": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_291_202001-07-2020271": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_513_201907-08-2019900": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_204_202110-02-2021457": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_735_202020-11-20201394": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_633_202021-11-2020372": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_13_202102-01-20212274": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_831_202007-12-20201097": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_652_202009-10-20201800": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_481_202003-09-2020645": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_246_202105-03-2021354": "DENIED", + "Bails Applications_37_202014-01-2020555": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_528_202019-08-2020552": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_55_201903-06-20191463": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6_202001-02-2020413": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_766_201907-12-20191506": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_176_202101-02-20211795": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_48_202112-01-2021739": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_661_202012-10-20201775": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_413_202123-03-20211152": "GRANTED", + "Bails Applications_45_202020-01-2020509": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_582_202014-09-20202015": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_141_202027-07-202029": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_199_202006-06-2020361": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_578_202014-09-20202011": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_183_202102-02-20211782": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_269_202102-03-20211550": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6_202101-01-20212295": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_490_202029-09-2020588": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_630_201922-10-20191813": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_370_202008-07-2020870": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_599_202029-09-20201970": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_411_201906-07-20191130": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_374_202005-08-2020129": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_572_202006-10-2020549": "DENIED", + "Bails Applications_937_201917-10-2019603": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_289_202010-06-20201135": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_717_201921-11-20191631": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_95_202108-02-2021127": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_372_201921-06-20191222": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5_202102-01-2021278": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_373_202116-03-20211241": "GRANTED", + "Bails Applications_1182_201924-12-20199": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_212_202012-03-2020672": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_49_202113-01-2021729": "DENIED", + "Bails Applications_580_201908-07-2019409": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_298_202002-07-2020264": "DENIED", + "Bails Applications_947_201921-10-2019583": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_834_202001-01-2021853": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_431_202031-07-2020735": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_424_201911-07-20191124": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_235_202112-02-20211614": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_607_201915-10-20191855": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_320_202020-06-20201052": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_109_202010-02-2020903": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_428_202003-09-2020637": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_318_202108-03-20211333": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_174_202029-05-2020411": "DENIED", + "Bails Applications_535_201925-06-2019504": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_840_202009-12-20201065": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_660_202012-10-20201774": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8_202101-01-20212297": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_232_202115-03-2021273": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_515_202018-08-2020560": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_242_202112-02-20211618": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_606_202030-09-20201952": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_652_201902-11-20191778": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_245_202021-10-2020208": "GRANTED", + "Bails Applications_879_201920-09-2019746": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_714_202020-11-20201373": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_376_202005-08-2020131": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_324_202002-12-202088": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_442_201917-07-20191033": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_589_202022-09-20201986": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_598_202009-10-2020516": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_42_202121-01-2021215": "GRANTED", + "Bails Applications_1148_201916-12-201990": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_369_202116-03-20211237": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_913_202023-12-2020738": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_543_202113-04-2021875": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_359_202031-07-2020142": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_285_202103-03-20211515": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_267_202108-03-2021330": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_295_202012-06-20201121": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_672_201907-11-20191735": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_504_201930-07-2019936": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_283_202008-06-20201146": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_134_202127-01-20211871": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_76_202003-03-202050": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_495_201927-07-2019944": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_238_202111-02-20211636": "GRANTED", + "Bails Applications_986_201914-11-2019457": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_430_202124-03-20211127": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_413_202013-08-2020105": "GRANTED", + "Bails Applications_75_202024-01-2020463": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_295_202030-06-2020276": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_46_202107-01-20212157": "DENIED", + "Bails Applications_466_201901-06-2019583": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_714_202027-11-2020317": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_526_202014-09-2020616": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_256_201927-07-201935": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_243_202027-05-20201217": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_34_202105-01-20212224": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_757_201905-12-20191515": "GRANTED", + "Bails Applications_1101_201906-12-2019190": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_461_202101-04-20211023": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_168_202108-02-2021485": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_904_202023-12-2020729": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_665_202027-11-2020308": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_334_202007-12-202071": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_320_202108-03-20211335": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_403_202122-03-20211177": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_732_202020-11-20201391": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_463_202027-08-2020672": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_864_202017-12-2020837": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_223_202109-02-20211664": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_184_202014-09-2020346": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_689_201914-11-20191685": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_157_202017-08-20204": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_69_202120-01-2021643": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_210_202115-03-2021271": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_44_202113-01-2021728": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_734_201926-11-20191589": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_293_202010-06-20201139": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_281_202007-11-2020158": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_339_202008-12-202068": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_175_202101-02-20211794": "DENIED", + "Bails Applications_1052_201928-11-2019273": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_813_201924-12-2019905": "GRANTED", + "Bails Applications_542_201929-06-2019484": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_644_202008-10-20201829": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_371_202116-03-20211239": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_161_202024-02-2020795": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_355_202125-03-2021160": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_458_202131-03-20211039": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_433_202019-08-202053": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_893_202022-12-2020758": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_387_202117-03-20211221": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_446_202019-08-202057": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_798_202027-11-20201254": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_80_202017-03-20205": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_729_202027-11-2020323": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_800_202027-11-20201256": "DENIED", + "Bails Applications_779_201921-08-201991": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_306_202017-06-20201084": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_853_202015-12-2020857": "GRANTED", + "Bails Applications_1117_201904-01-2020621": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_311_202126-03-2021134": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_581_202008-10-2020524": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_219_202108-02-20211686": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_517_202018-08-2020562": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_735_201926-11-20191590": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_257_202102-03-20211538": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_387_202013-07-2020829": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_78_202007-03-202018": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_433_201916-07-20191063": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_586_202015-09-20201996": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_64_202003-03-202034": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_409_202123-03-20211148": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_221_202007-10-2020260": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_799_201920-12-2019936": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_590_201904-10-20191920": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_213_202108-02-20211680": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_405_202122-03-20211179": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_867_202017-12-2020840": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_341_202030-06-2020968": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_289_202010-11-2020149": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_217_202004-06-2020386": "GRANTED", + "Bails Applications_54_202022-01-2020483": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_307_202105-03-20211466": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_352_202003-07-2020922": "GRANTED", + "Bails Applications_655_201921-08-201983": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_451_202031-07-2020753": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_188_202002-06-2020398": "DENIED", + "Bails Applications_63_202022-01-2020484": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_583_202014-09-20202016": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_23_202107-01-2021782": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_338_202008-12-202067": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_814_201924-12-2019906": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_79_202126-03-202132": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_58_202108-01-20212137": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_807_202002-12-20201221": "GRANTED", + "Bails Applications_1152_201918-12-201960": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_377_202023-12-202014": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_238_202026-05-20201232": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_348_202001-07-2020953": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_405_202017-07-2020776": "DENIED", + "Bails Applications_866_201931-10-2019523": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_474_201922-07-2019983": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_173_201913-05-2019299": "DENIED", + "Bails Applications_652_201927-07-2019238": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_142_202108-04-20218": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_294_202002-07-2020261": "DENIED", + "Bails Applications_465_201927-05-2019628": "DENIED", + "Bails Applications_411_201910-05-2019740": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_481_202105-04-2021986": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_160_202022-05-2020434": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_850_202004-01-2021827": "DENIED", + "Bails Applications_1093_201910-12-2019150": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_19_202112-01-2021254": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_215_202003-10-2020278": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_577_202006-10-2020550": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_55_202015-02-2020144": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_606_202012-10-2020499": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_232_202006-06-2020366": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_183_202103-02-2021536": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_477_201922-07-2019986": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_296_202012-06-20201122": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_751_202020-11-20201407": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_499_202003-09-2020653": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_800_201920-12-2019937": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7_202002-01-20201400": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_198_201903-06-2019208": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_872_202019-12-2020798": "GRANTED", + "Bails Applications_634_201925-07-2019262": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_152_202108-02-2021479": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_299_202015-06-20201106": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_274_202005-11-2020174": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_383_202006-08-2020126": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_738_202004-12-2020260": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_400_202105-04-202192": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_764_202009-12-2020184": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_73_202102-02-2021156": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_133_202015-02-2020840": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_82_202118-01-2021701": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_389_202014-07-2020817": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_346_202030-06-2020972": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_182_202102-02-20211781": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_143_201913-11-20192515": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_570_201918-09-20192019": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_450_202031-07-2020752": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_436_202125-03-20211088": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_118_202011-02-2020891": "GRANTED", + "Bails Applications_607_201910-07-2019396": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_14_202102-01-20212275": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_252_202102-03-20211533": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_205_202004-06-2020385": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_140_202109-02-2021464": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6_202002-01-20201399": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_719_202027-11-2020321": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_283_202115-03-2021277": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_548_202003-09-20202084": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_374_201901-11-2019116": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_623_202016-10-2020452": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_414_202020-07-2020762": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_460_202005-08-2020693": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_292_202011-11-2020143": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_450_202125-03-20211102": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_402_202010-08-2020114": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_317_202108-03-20211332": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_202_202028-09-2020304": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_175_202010-09-2020349": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_892_202022-12-2020757": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_282_201904-05-20191333": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_138_202112-02-2021426": "GRANTED", + "Bails Applications_1073_201904-12-2019216": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_797_202027-11-20201253": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_670_202013-10-20201755": "GRANTED", + "Bails Applications_1114_201912-12-2019133": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_608_202030-09-20201954": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_146_202130-01-2021563": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_354_202110-03-20211297": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_291_202011-11-2020142": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_85_201906-12-20192392": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_438_202125-03-20211090": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_457_201918-07-20191022": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_860_202016-12-2020852": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_9_202020-01-20201466": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_159_202024-02-2020793": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_366_202115-03-20211262": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_542_201927-08-2019831": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_312_202105-03-20211471": "GRANTED", + "Bails Applications_710_201931-07-2019203": "DENIED", + "Bails Applications_905_201903-10-2019670": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_585_202007-10-2020536": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_421_202013-08-2020106": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_188_202104-02-20211743": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_182_201921-05-2019265": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_472_202102-04-20211009": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_912_202023-12-2020737": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_111_202120-01-20211933": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_288_202123-03-2021188": "GRANTED", + "Bails Applications_493_201906-06-2019569": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_316_202019-06-20201062": "GRANTED", + "Bails Applications_681_201930-07-2019215": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_242_202108-03-2021324": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_378_202116-03-20211246": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_207_202030-09-2020290": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_94_202106-02-2021141": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_267_202024-06-2020288": "DENIED", + "Bails Applications_794_201927-08-201929": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_135_202105-02-2021514": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_179_202102-02-20211778": "GRANTED", + "Bails Applications_952_201931-10-2019525": "GRANTED", + "Bails Applications_701_201902-08-2019168": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_79_202120-01-2021644": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_525_202019-08-2020550": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_250_202028-05-20201208": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_454_202021-08-202032": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_506_202003-09-2020660": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_552_202003-09-20202087": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_123_202122-01-20211900": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_66_202130-01-2021168": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_686_202019-10-20201590": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_62_202003-03-202032": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_349_202110-03-20211292": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_784_202026-11-20201272": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_129_202112-03-202167": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_221_201908-07-2019130": "GRANTED", + "Bails Applications_447_201920-05-2019675": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_274_201926-08-20197": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_483_202027-08-2020675": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_256_202029-05-20201197": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_214_202108-02-20211681": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_290_202010-06-20201136": "GRANTED", + "Bails Applications_790_201928-08-201912": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_218_202017-03-2020657": "DENIED", + "Bails Applications_981_201901-11-2019518": "GRANTED", + "Bails Applications_720_201930-07-2019223": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_259_202031-10-2020191": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_908_202023-12-2020733": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_722_201921-11-20191636": "GRANTED", + "Bails Applications_460_201921-05-2019666": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_87_202018-03-20201": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_687_202020-10-20201582": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_301_202013-11-2020126": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_549_202119-04-2021863": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_315_202026-11-2020103": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_552_202021-09-2020611": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_573_202010-09-20202041": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_12_202003-02-2020398": "DENIED", + "Bails Applications_538_201926-06-2019503": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_195_202004-03-2020698": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_205_202007-03-2020675": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_624_201921-10-20191826": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_707_201916-11-20191653": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_452_202126-03-20211061": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_498_202105-04-2021993": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_83_202017-03-20208": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_320_201903-10-2019189": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_350_202110-03-20211293": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_605_202014-10-2020477": "DENIED", + "Bails Applications_424_201909-05-2019748": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_557_201905-09-20192312": "DENIED", + "Bails Applications_18_202009-01-2020583": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_227_202109-02-20211668": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_73_202029-01-20201195": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_728_202005-12-2020226": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_134_202015-02-2020841": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_319_201903-10-2019188": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_369_202022-12-202024": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_380_202024-12-20208": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_150_202019-02-2020809": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_373_201901-11-2019115": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_507_201905-08-2019911": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_265_202102-03-20211546": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_385_202117-03-20211219": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_61_201925-07-20191374": "GRANTED", + "Bails Applications_501_201907-06-2019562": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_282_201904-09-2019309": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_357_202105-04-202184": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_718_202027-11-2020320": "DENIED", + "Bails Applications_1164_201924-12-20192": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_10_202107-01-2021262": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_325_202010-07-2020218": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_517_202029-09-2020589": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_113_202010-06-202093": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_287_202001-07-2020269": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_713_201920-11-20191639": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_130_202010-07-202052": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_185_202103-02-2021538": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_46_202013-02-2020170": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_789_202009-12-2020188": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_340_202109-03-20211314": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_747_202007-12-2020206": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_811_202003-12-20201201": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_615_202003-10-20201920": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_397_202013-08-2020100": "DENIED", + "Bails Applications_763_201919-08-2019110": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_485_201923-07-2019978": "GRANTED", + "Bails Applications_1025_201921-11-2019356": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_318_202027-11-202097": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_651_202026-11-2020333": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_11_202106-01-2021798": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_189_202104-02-20211744": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_325_202122-03-2021208": "DENIED", + "Bails Applications_64_202022-01-2020485": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_109_202119-01-20211959": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_110_202127-01-2021588": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_457_202021-08-202035": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_27_202107-01-2021785": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_429_201918-12-201916": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_615_202015-10-2020470": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_781_201911-12-20191469": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_106_202121-01-2021627": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_108_202102-03-202198": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_144_202103-02-2021533": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_326_202010-07-2020219": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_695_201914-11-20191691": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_337_202025-06-20201003": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_577_202014-09-20202010": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_921_202024-12-2020709": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_22_202104-01-20212248": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_22_202114-01-2021718": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_536_202005-10-2020560": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_318_202016-07-2020163": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_66_202012-03-202016": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_457_202126-03-20211066": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_83_202121-01-2021626": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_290_202104-03-20211487": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_358_202112-03-20211279": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_501_201930-07-2019933": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_199_202028-09-2020302": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_817_202018-12-202048": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_728_202020-11-20201387": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_422_202124-03-20211119": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7_202107-01-2021781": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_781_202024-11-20201310": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_265_202116-03-2021250": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_286_202103-03-20211516": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_326_202108-03-20211341": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_821_202004-12-20201183": "DENIED", + "Bails Applications_982_201907-11-2019477": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_283_201904-05-20191334": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_476_202007-08-2020667": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_23_202008-01-20201335": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_418_201910-12-201938": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_176_202010-09-2020350": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_293_202011-11-2020144": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_486_202022-09-2020603": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_92_202127-01-2021586": "DENIED", + "Bails Applications_1165_201919-12-201947": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_84_202030-01-20201187": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_364_202007-07-2020886": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_209_202103-03-2021374": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_91_202028-02-202077": "DENIED", + "Bails Applications_1064_201926-11-2019295": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_504_202106-04-2021971": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_650_201902-11-20191776": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_485_202105-04-2021990": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_594_202029-09-20201965": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_595_201907-10-20191893": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_155_202012-08-202020": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_161_202103-02-2021535": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_211_202012-03-2020671": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_301_202003-07-2020251": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_769_201909-12-20191494": "DENIED", + "Bails Applications_629_201925-07-2019260": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_798_202005-01-2021815": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_877_202019-12-2020802": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_535_201919-08-2019878": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_362_202031-07-2020143": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_71_202111-01-20212118": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_172_202130-01-20211817": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_262_202102-03-20211543": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_9_202001-02-2020415": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_266_202122-03-2021201": "DENIED", + "Bails Applications_1110_201906-12-2019191": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_763_202005-12-2020234": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_393_201916-11-201984": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5_202107-01-2021780": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_205_202111-02-2021443": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_853_202005-01-2021817": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_201_202030-09-2020287": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_242_202020-10-2020216": "GRANTED", + "Bails Applications_1136_201917-12-201975": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_549_202003-09-20202085": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_128_202125-01-20211890": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_345_202017-07-2020161": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_394_202118-03-20211202": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_32_202108-01-2021770": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_575_202014-09-20202008": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_156_202024-02-2020790": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_66_202028-01-20201215": "DENIED", + "Bails Applications_1063_201925-11-2019312": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_542_202113-04-2021874": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_323_202108-03-20211338": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_795_202027-11-20201251": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_279_202006-11-2020166": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_168_202002-09-2020358": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_506_202014-08-2020611": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_429_202114-04-202120": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_150_202101-02-2021553": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_402_202107-04-202163": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_144_202018-02-2020814": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_709_201918-11-20191645": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_623_201913-11-20191700": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_63_202003-03-202033": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_178_202101-03-2021395": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_215_202108-02-20211682": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_26_202114-01-2021241": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_803_201921-12-2019919": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_391_202106-04-202174": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_773_202005-12-2020238": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_393_202112-04-202136": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_425_201916-07-20191055": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3_202028-01-20201547": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_712_202020-11-20201371": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_387_202007-08-2020117": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_166_201903-05-2019324": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_818_202004-12-20201180": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_803_202001-12-20201232": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_405_202018-08-202068": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_114_202028-02-202079": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_719_201921-11-20191633": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_493_202013-08-2020630": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_211_202001-10-2020281": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_48_202017-01-20201276": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_207_202005-06-2020368": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_111_202122-01-2021614": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_340_201915-10-2019154": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_573_202013-10-2020484": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_29_202113-01-2021727": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_47_202017-01-20201275": "DENIED", + "Bails Applications_990_201919-11-2019388": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_771_202013-01-2021734": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_181_202108-02-2021488": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_38_202127-01-2021238": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_540_201927-08-2019829": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_150_202128-01-20211854": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_408_202123-03-20211147": "GRANTED", + "Bails Applications_853_201913-09-2019820": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_76_202118-01-2021700": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_771_202024-11-20201302": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_171_202007-09-2020354": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_563_201913-09-20192285": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_226_202010-06-2020334": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_97_202004-02-20201149": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_464_201919-07-20191010": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_907_202023-12-2020732": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_36_202105-01-20212226": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_412_202123-03-20211151": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_733_202020-11-20201392": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_284_202103-03-20211514": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6_202014-01-20201474": "GRANTED", + "Bails Applications_463_201920-05-2019681": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_404_202122-03-20211178": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_408_201905-07-20191143": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210_202012-03-2020670": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_388_202007-08-2020118": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_125_202012-02-2020877": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_608_201915-10-20191856": "GRANTED", + "Bails Applications_495_201903-06-2019579": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_411_202017-07-2020782": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_438_201916-07-20191068": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_42_202106-01-20212193": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_129_202013-02-2020860": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_618_202016-10-2020449": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_580_202019-10-2020436": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_709_202009-12-2020183": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_451_202130-04-20217": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_411_202123-03-20211150": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_455_202003-08-2020715": "DENIED", + "Bails Applications_450_201917-05-2019700": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_627_201922-10-20191810": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_143_202128-01-20211847": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_338_201911-10-2019165": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_216_202005-10-2020272": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_226_201911-07-2019117": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_9_202104-01-2021272": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_252_202029-10-2020197": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_459_202005-08-2020692": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_294_202012-11-2020128": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_496_202106-04-2021964": "DENIED", + "Bails Applications_1059_201907-12-2019179": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_170_202007-09-2020353": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_226_202008-10-2020257": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_353_202016-12-202036": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_687_202027-11-2020311": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_562_202007-09-20202063": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_68_202004-03-202030": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_18_202028-01-20201458": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_122_202122-01-20211899": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_395_201903-07-20191174": "DENIED", + "Bails Applications_1084_201905-12-2019197": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_713_202002-12-2020290": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_801_202001-12-20201230": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_505_202003-09-2020659": "DENIED", + "Bails Applications_821_201927-08-201932": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_192_202003-03-2020713": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_554_202003-09-20202089": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_437_201916-07-20191067": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_637_202007-10-20201854": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_546_202029-09-2020594": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_11_202001-02-2020416": "DENIED", + "Bails Applications_20_202020-01-2020508": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_360_202004-07-2020909": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_629_202016-10-2020458": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_54_202025-02-202051": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_165_202025-02-2020771": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_192_202104-02-20211747": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_645_201901-11-20191779": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_332_202116-04-20215": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1185_202009-12-2020132": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_260_202125-02-2021159": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_131_202018-02-2020200": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_494_202015-09-2020518": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_499_201914-05-2019815": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1321_201905-12-2019230": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_96_202102-02-2021396": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_199_202029-02-2020104": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1136_201916-10-2019615": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1132_201919-11-2019387": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_307_202013-05-2020289": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_301_202101-03-2021137": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_787_201909-07-2019442": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_110_202105-02-2021348": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1009_202019-10-2020311": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1138_202023-11-2020171": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_246_202012-03-202050": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1419_201902-01-2020669": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1277_202011-01-2021563": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_86_202021-05-2020384": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_63_202121-01-2021468": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_601_202010-08-2020135": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_125_202019-02-2020191": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_842_201925-07-2019289": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_719_202028-08-2020715": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_547_202012-10-2020868": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1292_201908-01-2020580": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_423_202005-06-2020217": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_186_202017-03-202022": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_155_202115-02-2021258": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_195_202111-02-2021284": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_622_201921-06-2019574": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1009_201905-09-20191010": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_170_202102-02-2021759": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_700_201902-07-2019489": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_271_202013-05-2020286": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_556_201928-05-2019717": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_808_202005-09-2020620": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_857_201906-08-2019185": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1119_201916-10-2019613": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_997_201918-09-2019831": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_603_202017-08-2020103": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_412_202007-09-2020983": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_158_202005-03-202079": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_800_202007-09-2020613": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_208_202108-02-2021704": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_85_202021-05-2020383": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_407_202031-07-2020171": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_523_202024-08-202035": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_222_202012-03-202045": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_535_202012-08-2020120": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_527_201909-05-2019844": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_480_201909-05-2019839": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_968_201912-09-2019938": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_790_201925-07-2019286": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1297_201910-12-2019186": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1227_201907-01-2020601": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_467_202012-06-2020192": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_600_202021-08-202050": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1441_201907-01-2020606": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1056_201906-01-2020625": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7_202118-01-2021498": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_429_202008-06-2020213": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_115_202108-02-2021327": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_710_201925-07-2019279": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_422_202112-04-202141": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_246_202013-10-2020862": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_275_202001-06-2020356": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1112_201915-11-2019428": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_192_202108-02-2021336": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_67_202028-02-2020118": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_321_202112-04-202135": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_900_202022-09-2020475": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2_202021-01-2020935": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_282_202002-06-2020353": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_578_202019-10-2020837": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_86_202031-08-2020695": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1039_201924-09-2019759": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_630_202019-11-2020809": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_386_201903-05-2019880": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_512_202018-08-202084": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1272_202008-01-2021567": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1108_201906-11-2019482": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_383_201902-05-2019895": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1068_202014-10-2020352": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_634_202019-11-2020812": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_222_202013-05-2020413": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1064_201925-09-2019744": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_875_202021-09-2020486": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1159_201925-11-2019332": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_274_202001-06-2020355": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1202_201921-11-2019366": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1093_201904-10-2019703": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1278_202030-01-2021422": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1232_201919-11-2019391": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1216_202011-12-2020115": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1102_201909-10-2019681": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_153_202017-02-2020232": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1048_202015-10-2020345": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_655_202025-08-202023": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1122_201905-12-2019220": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_270_202116-04-20213": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_65_202021-01-2020474": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_465_202018-08-202082": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_591_201903-06-2019640": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_947_202001-10-2020420": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_163_202125-02-2021149": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_660_202019-08-202078": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_435_201909-05-2019836": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_561_201929-05-2019690": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_147_202101-02-2021771": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_949_202029-09-2020438": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_430_202018-08-202081": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_833_202009-09-2020582": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_769_201922-07-2019331": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_138_202101-02-2021412": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_920_202022-09-2020478": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_321_202005-08-2020339": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_161_202103-02-2021387": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_91_202027-05-2020368": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_106_202023-01-2020429": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_144_202125-02-2021148": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_592_202017-08-2020102": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1024_202022-10-2020285": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_897_202023-09-2020464": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_560_201928-05-2019720": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_402_202122-03-202153": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_319_202112-04-202133": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_8_202107-01-2021574": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_518_201914-05-2019817": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_867_202015-09-2020529": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_28_202019-02-2020181": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_983_202012-10-2020364": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_849_201908-08-2019156": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_707_201928-06-2019514": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1019_201918-09-2019834": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_80_202115-02-2021255": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_693_202001-09-2020682": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_181_202111-02-2021282": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_879_202021-09-2020487": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_153_202101-02-2021772": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_251_202015-05-2020396": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1148_201922-11-2019346": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_95_202128-01-2021437": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1161_201910-12-2019183": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_466_201921-05-2019762": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_550_201928-05-2019715": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_33_202119-01-2021485": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1016_201919-09-2019817": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3_202021-01-2020936": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_977_201904-09-20191029": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_319_202125-02-2021629": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_32_202119-01-2021484": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_234_201917-05-2019776": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_801_202004-09-2020634": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_472_202021-09-2020936": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_23_202111-01-2021559": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_91_202129-01-2021425": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_114_202102-02-2021400": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_338_202116-04-20216": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_915_201918-09-2019827": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1357_201910-12-2019192": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_215_202118-02-2021645": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_297_202008-06-2020351": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1149_201916-10-2019616": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_550_202012-10-2020869": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_482_201909-05-2019841": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_890_201922-08-201939": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1136_202020-11-2020183": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_723_202022-12-2020739": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_943_202028-09-2020450": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_826_201923-09-2019773": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_393_202024-08-2020312": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_279_202029-05-2020364": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_741_201910-07-2019428": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1109_201906-11-2019483": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_578_201928-05-2019721": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_31_202108-01-2021566": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_724_202023-12-2020735": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_234_202117-02-2021248": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_864_202021-09-2020485": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1069_202021-10-2020302": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_103_202025-02-2020154": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_685_202026-08-20209": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_665_202007-09-2020606": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_444_201908-05-2019853": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_847_201909-08-2019143": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_230_202006-03-202071": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_689_201921-06-2019585": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_820_201921-08-201960": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_839_201908-08-2019154": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_201_202008-09-2020586": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1168_201915-11-2019431": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1113_202020-11-2020181": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_176_202103-02-2021747": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_120_202128-01-2021801": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_13_202115-01-2021515": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1130_201913-11-2019446": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_168_202110-02-2021294": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_276_202118-02-2021646": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1193_202026-11-2020165": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_79_202027-01-2020405": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_802_202007-09-2020614": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_878_202014-09-2020548": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_571_201930-05-2019680": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1007_201918-09-2019833": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_911_201925-09-2019739": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_530_202018-08-202086": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1303_201929-11-2019299": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_898_201914-08-2019120": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_629_202002-09-2020657": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_760_202001-09-2020690": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1223_201915-11-2019434": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_563_201929-05-2019692": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_813_202018-09-2020498": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_264_202022-05-2020377": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_661_202018-08-202090": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_442_202010-06-2020204": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2548_202002-12-2020477": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_712_202028-05-20201433": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3263_202027-11-2020564": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_353_202005-08-202090": "GRANTED", + "Bail_181_201912-11-20191244": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2210_201930-07-2019573": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1537_201907-06-20192076": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3656_202001-01-20212620": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1821_201929-05-20193839": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_746_202015-12-202069": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_52_202018-01-20201426": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_332_202128-01-20211838": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1758_201909-07-20191591": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_115_202101-02-2021606": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2413_202030-09-20201692": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1819_201929-06-20191791": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3400_202007-12-2020372": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2182_201927-06-20193579": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1072_202002-07-2020919": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1393_201928-05-20192269": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_68_202009-01-20202014": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3293_202002-12-2020492": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_41_202011-02-2020202": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1932_201925-07-2019715": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3126_201903-10-20192108": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_38_202011-02-2020200": "GRANTED", + "Bail_11_202028-01-20201260": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3573_202023-12-202037": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1568_201907-05-20194083": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_63_202018-01-20201428": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_619_202030-10-2020304": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3660_202004-01-20212590": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2678_201929-08-20199": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_173_202021-01-20201395": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1051_202131-03-2021249": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_951_201919-11-2019147": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3675_202001-01-20212621": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1478_201929-05-20192247": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_245_202007-07-2020199": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1360_202022-07-2020573": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1973_202005-09-20202359": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_663_202012-11-2020215": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4092_201901-01-20201821": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1890_202001-09-20202502": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4133_201909-01-20201656": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_661_202011-11-2020224": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_202_202025-02-2020434": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_840_202016-06-20201168": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1206_202004-07-2020871": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1447_202021-07-2020613": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_14_202004-01-2020398": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1397_202015-10-20202850": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1278_202009-07-2020784": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2017_201921-06-20193623": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3419_201901-11-20191417": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1407_202016-10-20202835": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_281_202014-07-2020171": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1907_202004-09-20202382": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1738_202025-08-202012": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2233_201927-07-2019639": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_76_202017-01-2020336": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_678_202019-11-2020187": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3167_201903-10-20193565": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2725_201911-09-20192936": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_789_202030-05-20201399": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1843_201930-05-20193816": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2979_201901-10-20192146": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1789_201909-07-20191593": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_138_202017-03-202019": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1461_201930-05-20192212": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_674_202018-11-2020197": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_580_202014-10-2020370": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_538_202109-02-20211502": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2392_202029-09-20201732": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2326_202025-09-20201861": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_405_202019-08-202038": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_585_202026-05-20201477": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1320_201925-05-20192323": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1084_202124-03-2021315": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2911_202004-11-2020939": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1454_202003-11-20202737": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1390_201918-05-20192517": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_193_202019-02-2020517": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1273_202005-10-20202930": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2681_202016-10-20201325": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1752_202008-09-20202286": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_604_202111-02-20211420": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2713_201913-08-20192998": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2087_202004-09-20202405": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1190_202023-09-20202997": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_940_202110-03-2021670": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103_202022-01-2020298": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2813_201905-09-20193061": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_564_202006-10-2020402": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_73_202014-01-20201986": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_358_202014-08-202058": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2763_202021-10-20201221": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2579_202012-10-20201454": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_751_202117-02-20211306": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1394_202015-10-20202847": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2121_201924-06-20193606": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_417_202019-03-202044": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_78_202014-01-20201991": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3712_201926-11-2019911": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2022_201915-06-20193672": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_188_202113-01-20212394": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1787_201925-05-20193876": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_113_202006-03-202069": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_727_202005-06-20201301": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1125_201907-05-20192769": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_19_202108-01-20212458": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_519_202109-02-20211498": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3398_201902-11-20191375": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2801_202022-10-20201207": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_734_202122-02-20211064": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_162_202115-01-20212327": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_183_202111-02-2021486": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_285_202105-03-2021286": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_20_202004-01-2020402": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1744_202021-08-2020122": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2495_201925-07-20193152": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1223_202102-04-2021204": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2041_201931-07-2019518": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_20_202105-01-20213100": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_46_202008-01-2020381": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2282_201902-08-2019467": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1621_201930-05-20192225": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2505_202006-10-20201597": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_394_202018-08-202051": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101_202022-01-2020297": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2749_202020-10-20201279": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1_202001-02-2020256": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1649_201915-05-20194011": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1156_202003-07-2020896": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1669_201916-05-20193992": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_648_202124-02-20211000": "GRANTED", + "Bail_198_201914-11-20191161": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_318_202001-02-20201134": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2859_202003-11-2020973": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3318_202003-12-2020469": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2732_201906-09-20193009": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3588_201922-11-2019965": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1320_202007-10-20202906": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4027_201903-01-20201776": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_91_202017-02-20201864": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3639_201921-11-20191002": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1408_202016-10-20202836": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_574_202026-05-20201473": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_331_202027-02-2020383": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1797_201927-06-20191853": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2312_201907-08-2019392": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2151_201923-07-2019806": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2557_202009-10-20201486": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_625_202014-07-20201602": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1892_201901-06-20193780": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1506_201930-05-20192215": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6_202101-01-2021863": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_344_202027-02-2020387": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2559_202009-10-20201488": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2553_201927-07-20193124": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_477_202018-03-202073": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2498_202005-10-20201636": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1611_202004-08-2020366": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_493_202102-02-20211709": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_31_202004-01-20202041": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2016_201910-07-20191563": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_639_202115-02-20211340": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_30_202005-02-20201905": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1019_202018-06-20201132": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2032_201915-06-20193678": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_140_202113-01-20212390": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_77_202112-01-20212420": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_680_202117-02-20211299": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_330_202028-07-2020113": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_62_202108-01-20213081": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2020_202007-09-20202345": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1778_201925-05-20193868": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_172_202110-02-2021506": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1213_202004-07-2020872": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3757_201905-12-2019747": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_518_202023-09-2020477": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1151_202019-09-20203027": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1053_202025-06-2020970": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_87_202120-01-2021699": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2600_201903-09-20193135": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3621_202023-12-202042": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2383_201918-07-20193302": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3162_201909-10-20193538": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1268_201910-05-20192664": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2334_201910-07-20193402": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_31_202007-02-2020225": "GRANTED", + "Bail_126_201917-08-2019181": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3730_202004-01-20212597": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1410_202023-07-2020542": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2603_201931-07-20193084": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2392_201920-07-20193230": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2788_201920-08-20192965": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2432_201920-07-20193243": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3679_201926-11-2019898": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_990_201903-12-201993": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2175_202016-09-20202095": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2200_201907-08-2019385": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3625_202001-01-20212615": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3609_201930-11-2019824": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_528_202025-09-2020467": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_664_202012-11-2020216": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1541_202022-07-2020596": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2231_202022-09-20201983": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2651_202008-10-20201520": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3347_201919-10-20191702": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3037_201926-09-20192349": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_350_202004-06-20201656": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_15_202104-01-2021848": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1537_202012-11-20202728": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2146_201919-07-2019870": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_551_202022-07-2020563": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_997_202001-09-20203109": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_56_202128-01-20211830": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3589_202001-01-20212612": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_67_202017-01-2020331": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2739_201917-08-20192978": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_287_202120-01-20212204": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1605_201912-06-20192036": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3675_201923-12-20193278": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1886_201926-06-20191883": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_34_202010-02-2020206": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_929_202012-06-20201217": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_264_202010-07-2020181": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3646_201917-12-20193319": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2442_201913-08-2019268": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_900_202021-08-20201508": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2055_201917-06-20193667": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2485_202029-09-20201751": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_263_202010-07-2020180": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_87_202026-02-2020123": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2986_202011-11-2020794": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_75_202118-01-2021722": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3647_202018-12-2020108": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_183_202128-01-20212946": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2366_201918-07-20193286": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1413_202017-10-20202832": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1280_202117-04-202129": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2626_202014-10-20201382": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_164_202028-05-2020217": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1381_202120-04-202122": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_796_202005-08-20201546": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2325_201910-07-20193400": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_61_202031-10-202053": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_562_202006-10-2020400": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1065_201921-12-201923": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_498_202018-09-2020498": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1940_201907-06-20193725": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2368_202028-09-20201767": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2252_201904-07-20193508": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_840_202105-03-2021765": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_341_202124-03-2021156": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3827_201917-12-2019196": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2212_201901-07-20193569": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_287_202105-03-2021288": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_75_202014-01-20201988": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_638_202002-11-2020288": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_121_202012-03-202061": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1298_202005-10-20202933": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1445_202021-07-2020612": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_733_202006-06-20201284": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1112_202002-07-2020925": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1726_201921-05-20193925": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_656_202028-05-20201432": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_213_202118-02-2021423": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2632_202014-10-20201386": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2502_201931-08-20193188": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_952_202025-08-20201500": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2498_201925-07-20193155": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1065_202026-06-2020945": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_25_202006-02-20201032": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3866_201918-12-2019170": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1322_202014-07-2020717": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_696_202010-06-20201249": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1132_202004-07-2020857": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_33_202007-01-20202026": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_41_202113-01-20212373": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2275_201905-07-20193481": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1_202101-01-20213136": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3471_201907-11-20191296": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2527_201925-07-20193156": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3444_201901-11-20191421": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_777_202002-06-20201380": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_684_202111-02-20211423": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1490_201929-05-20192249": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3861_201906-12-2019722": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3160_201909-10-20193536": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2284_201913-08-2019259": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3760_201905-12-2019750": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1962_202001-09-20202516": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2314_202022-09-20202000": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_824_202110-03-2021662": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_457_202004-09-2020580": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_121_202102-02-2021586": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_638_202027-05-20201458": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_301_202005-03-2020220": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1313_202010-07-2020757": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_631_202004-11-2020264": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1711_202020-08-2020151": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_561_202105-02-20211608": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2550_201930-08-20193236": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1009_202002-09-20203099": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_470_202128-04-20213": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1316_202112-04-202166": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2008_201923-07-2019788": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_377_202117-02-20212826": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_570_202007-10-2020391": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1037_202119-03-2021463": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1555_202027-07-2020440": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1569_201911-06-20192050": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_133_202021-01-20201959": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1978_202015-09-20202117": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_448_202004-09-2020578": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1025_202117-03-2021521": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3945_201911-12-2019638": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2669_201906-09-20192999": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2913_202003-11-2020982": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_553_202003-10-2020418": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3282_201919-10-20191699": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_71_202018-02-2020168": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1253_202008-07-2020794": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_389_202019-08-202030": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1296_202117-04-202132": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_311_202029-02-2020324": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3515_202018-12-202085": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2067_202009-09-20202253": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3424_201907-11-20191292": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_437_202104-02-20211634": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2638_201906-08-20193050": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_511_202030-09-2020433": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2798_201921-08-20192944": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1373_202021-07-2020607": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1727_201921-05-20193926": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_729_202122-02-20211062": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_21_202004-01-20202040": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_119_201926-07-201916": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2289_202023-09-20201952": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3681_202018-01-20212280": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_21_202105-01-2021837": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_914_201907-11-2019170": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1338_202009-10-20202879": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2847_201921-09-20192458": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2021_201915-06-20193671": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1987_201911-06-20193703": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1819_202027-08-20202595": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4038_201917-12-2019210": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_390_202012-03-2020152": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500_202106-02-20211573": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_697_202122-02-20211058": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_395_202018-08-202052": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2319_202022-09-20202002": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2512_202007-10-20201546": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_709_202030-11-2020142": "GRANTED", + "Bail_203_201915-11-20191124": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1817_202025-08-202027": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1257_201921-05-20192473": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2403_202029-09-20201739": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_765_202017-12-202049": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3072_202011-11-2020808": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2542_202008-10-20201514": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1974_202003-09-20202435": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1580_201924-05-20192388": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_111_201911-10-20194129": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_916_202115-03-2021599": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_369_202006-06-20201645": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_742_202002-06-20201378": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_647_202117-02-20211291": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_132_202102-02-2021589": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2182_202015-09-20202149": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_282_202104-03-2021308": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3335_202002-12-2020501": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_108_202023-01-2020290": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1921_201906-06-20193747": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3362_202002-12-2020508": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2320_202022-09-20202003": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_69_202009-01-20202015": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1345_201909-05-20192704": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3210_201916-10-20193477": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_930_202027-08-20203125": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1871_201931-05-20193794": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_201_202116-02-2021446": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_67_202105-01-20213105": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1619_201910-05-20194035": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_371_202128-01-20211848": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1656_201916-05-20193990": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_858_202025-08-20201491": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2234_201903-07-20193550": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1695_202010-12-20202655": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3025_202003-11-20201005": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1146_202002-07-2020929": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1382_201924-05-20192375": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1704_201918-05-20193955": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_27_202105-01-20213101": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2170_201926-06-20193589": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2719_201907-09-20192966": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_113_202130-01-2021623": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_62_202017-01-20201485": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_79_202017-01-2020339": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_668_202019-11-2020186": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4050_201907-01-20201718": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2260_201904-07-20193516": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1170_201901-05-20192906": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_118_201914-10-20194119": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_498_202021-03-202011": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1638_201929-06-20191780": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_815_202012-06-20201195": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2459_202028-09-20201772": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3086_202010-11-2020853": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1550_202013-11-20202719": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_840_202019-08-20201522": "GRANTED", + "Bail_63_201901-05-20192916": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_787_202124-02-20211007": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3653_202007-01-20212501": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_412_202112-04-202143": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1145_202017-09-20203034": "DENIED", + "Bail_184_201917-10-20191791": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_277_202027-05-20201693": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1487_202028-07-2020425": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1309_201924-05-20192370": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_134_202113-01-20212387": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_140_202017-03-202021": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_926_201913-11-2019160": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_734_202005-06-20201304": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_969_202018-06-20201127": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_324_202023-07-2020138": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1858_202028-08-20202562": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1462_202028-10-20202769": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3720_202006-01-20212534": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_802_202101-03-2021916": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2441_202005-10-20201625": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_269_202103-03-2021321": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_447_202109-02-20211495": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_125_202128-01-20211833": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1314_201901-05-20192911": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3178_201905-10-20192034": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_381_202119-02-20212799": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_479_202010-09-2020548": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_804_202005-08-20201548": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_283_202115-02-20212838": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_80_202025-02-2020126": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3897_201907-12-2019698": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_774_202021-12-202025": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_290_202016-07-2020155": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_593_202026-05-20201481": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_759_202029-07-20201568": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_509_202019-09-2020493": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_138_202118-01-20212264": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_337_202029-07-2020108": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3891_201918-12-2019172": "DENIED", + "Bail_82_201901-06-20192176": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_161_202027-01-20201273": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_930_201913-11-2019161": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_137_202019-02-2020513": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_682_202019-11-2020191": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_531_202125-03-20212658": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1539_201910-05-20194030": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_74_202014-01-20201987": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_166_202112-02-2021467": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2538_202008-10-20201511": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1259_202029-09-20202964": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2_202105-01-20213095": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2486_201925-07-20193147": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2172_202009-09-20202268": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_834_202104-03-2021826": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_790_202004-08-20201557": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3459_202016-12-2020161": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2228_201903-07-20193546": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2671_202015-10-20201362": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3168_201910-10-20191946": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2524_202007-10-20201550": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3358_201924-10-20191583": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3739_202005-01-20212565": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_71_202116-01-2021732": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_47_202108-01-20212469": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_614_202030-10-2020300": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_274_202027-05-20201691": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_152_202003-03-20201841": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2603_201930-08-20193246": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_313_202029-05-20201673": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1367_202023-07-2020534": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_15_202119-03-202128": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_594_202112-02-20211372": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_28_202012-02-20201868": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_658_202009-11-2020236": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_360_202119-02-20212797": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_145_202021-01-20201392": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2509_201926-07-20193136": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3209_201910-10-20193525": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2654_201907-08-20193045": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2752_202016-10-20201334": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_131_202102-02-2021588": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1117_202016-09-20203037": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1070_202024-06-2020995": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1161_202022-09-20203007": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_277_202006-02-20201025": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_690_202117-02-20211302": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_727_202123-02-20211030": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1028_201910-12-201971": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1076_202026-06-2020947": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_772_202019-12-202031": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_966_202118-03-2021494": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_346_202125-03-2021149": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3386_201925-10-20191546": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_85_202120-01-2021697": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_998_202115-03-2021609": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1981_201926-07-2019675": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_995_202110-03-2021683": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1035_201911-12-201967": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_90_202021-01-2020304": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3020_201901-10-20192151": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2107_201919-07-2019868": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3399_201907-11-20191291": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1974_201904-07-20191719": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_333_202027-02-2020385": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_647_202004-11-2020266": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_712_202002-12-2020128": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2615_202008-10-20201517": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2408_201908-08-2019359": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2486_201917-08-2019172": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_126_202013-03-202038": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_26_202014-01-20202577": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_407_202021-08-202016": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_171_202015-02-2020595": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2620_202006-10-20201606": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_999_202001-09-20203110": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_374_202014-08-202065": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1875_201931-05-20193798": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3503_202004-01-20212581": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_171_202029-05-2020215": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1080_202115-03-2021615": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1202_202009-07-2020773": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3213_202024-11-2020603": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3828_201913-12-2019524": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2028_202007-09-20202350": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_17_202004-01-2020400": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_824_202010-06-20201256": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3169_202020-11-2020646": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_98_201905-10-20194158": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2003_201914-06-20193683": "GRANTED", + "Bail_74_201922-05-20192453": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_683_202026-11-2020155": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3173_201904-10-20192080": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1350_202021-07-2020601": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2508_201926-07-20193135": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2364_201923-07-20193184": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2190_202022-09-20201980": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1733_202017-12-20202633": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_186_202111-02-2021489": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_154_202024-01-20201301": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_364_202005-03-2020225": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2539_202012-10-20201447": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_578_202012-10-2020385": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_262_202103-03-2021319": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_885_202108-03-2021721": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_935_201915-11-2019154": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1090_202131-03-2021255": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_291_202122-01-20212099": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4_202101-01-2021862": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6_202115-01-20212316": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_246_202007-07-2020200": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_59_202108-01-20213078": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1769_201924-05-20193886": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_791_202004-06-20201340": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_218_202119-02-2021415": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1109_202117-03-2021530": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_758_202016-12-202058": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1754_201922-05-20193903": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2906_202012-11-2020745": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1968_202003-09-20202433": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3547_201912-11-20191232": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2753_201920-08-20192953": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_665_202004-06-20201328": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1211_202002-07-2020934": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6_202004-02-2020242": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1646_201915-05-20194009": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_700_202118-02-20211243": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_251_202101-03-2021343": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_402_202108-04-202159": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2597_202013-10-20201415": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2545_202005-10-20201644": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_475_202009-09-2020555": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2365_201908-08-2019355": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_932_202017-06-20201142": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_501_202106-02-20211574": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_163_202115-01-20212328": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2529_202008-10-20201509": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_149_202020-03-20204": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1785_201929-06-20191786": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_130_201916-10-20194097": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_265_202010-07-2020182": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3363_202002-12-2020509": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_426_202012-03-2020161": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1332_202007-10-20202908": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1990_202003-09-20202441": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2978_201901-10-20192145": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_629_202112-04-20212631": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1062_201921-12-201922": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1641_202002-12-20202677": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1505_202029-07-2020399": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_315_202115-03-2021227": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3201_201919-10-20191695": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_61_202015-02-2020184": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3407_201913-11-20193383": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_480_202018-03-202076": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3124_201901-10-20193568": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1692_202013-08-2020238": "DENIED", + "Bail_86_201921-06-20191948": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1112_202124-03-2021324": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_80_202017-01-2020340": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_263_202026-05-20201700": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3646_202007-01-20212500": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_728_202117-02-20211305": "GRANTED", + "Bail_110_201930-07-2019590": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_144_202020-03-20201": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2113_201922-06-20193612": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3055_201923-09-20193628": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3278_202027-11-2020570": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3084_201925-09-20193616": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_343_202124-03-2021157": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3336_201918-10-20191748": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_689_202021-11-2020173": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_312_202112-02-20212859": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2501_202030-09-20201704": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1873_201931-05-20193796": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3345_201921-11-2019998": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_166_202112-01-20212431": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1472_201917-05-20192560": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3151_201916-10-20191821": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1073_202119-03-2021472": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1391_202015-07-2020690": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2397_202022-09-20202010": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1818_202027-08-20202594": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_789_202125-02-2021988": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3486_202011-12-2020283": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_134_202017-03-202016": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_737_202005-06-20201306": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1951_201927-07-2019624": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1648_201915-06-20191996": "DENIED", + "Bail_97_201903-07-20191760": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_39_202108-01-20212466": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_109_202129-01-2021635": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2428_202029-09-20201744": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2411_202007-10-20201536": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_755_202029-07-20201567": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_58_202014-01-2020355": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2877_202021-10-20201236": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3741_201930-11-2019834": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2113_201930-07-2019565": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2812_201921-08-20192945": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_246_202025-02-2020444": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2982_201926-09-20192344": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1565_201907-06-20192080": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_100_202015-02-2020585": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2814_201922-08-20192925": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1048_202117-03-2021525": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2996_201927-09-20192280": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1027_202116-03-2021557": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1990_201911-06-20193706": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2549_201927-07-20193123": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1224_202106-04-2021131": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_643_202117-02-20211287": "GRANTED", + "Bail_78_201924-05-20192393": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2334_202006-10-20201577": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_35_202010-02-2020207": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_89_202015-01-20201981": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_653_202009-11-2020235": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1846_201911-07-20191517": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3475_202015-12-2020201": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1917_201906-06-20193744": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3832_201918-12-2019169": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1632_202021-08-2020119": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2505_201916-08-2019209": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_464_202010-09-2020546": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1519_202022-07-2020594": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1735_201921-06-20191945": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1389_201918-05-20192516": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_511_202105-02-20211604": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1986_202007-09-20202340": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2455_201916-08-2019205": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_299_202109-03-2021250": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_127_202122-01-20212087": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1753_202018-12-20202631": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2655_201907-08-20193046": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_770_202019-12-202029": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1701_202020-08-2020150": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_221_202122-02-2021396": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_337_202128-01-20211841": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3511_202016-12-2020168": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_428_202109-02-20211492": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2102_201921-06-20193625": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1554_202013-11-20202722": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_696_202024-11-2020169": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_633_202002-11-2020285": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1093_202014-09-20203054": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2002_201914-06-20193682": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1504_201930-05-20192213": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2079_202009-09-20202262": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_169_202029-05-2020213": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1128_202119-03-2021475": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_81_202113-01-20213057": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3065_202010-11-2020848": "GRANTED", + "Bail_119_201909-08-2019312": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2809_201925-09-20192387": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2251_201905-07-20193478": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_259_202009-07-2020185": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3857_201912-12-2019580": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_987_202125-03-2021280": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3543_202001-01-20212606": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_277_202014-07-2020170": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_143_202103-02-2021569": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_592_202021-10-2020332": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3177_202018-11-2020717": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2060_202004-09-20202403": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1417_202021-07-2020611": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1058_202009-09-20203068": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_637_202002-11-2020287": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2355_201907-08-2019397": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3441_201907-11-20191293": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3310_201902-11-20191373": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_988_202110-03-2021682": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4056_201904-01-20201750": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2575_202008-10-20201516": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_740_202011-12-202088": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4086_201924-12-201942": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3272_201922-10-20191637": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3077_202013-11-2020729": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2653_201907-08-20193044": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_168_202024-01-20201304": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_868_202115-03-2021590": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_86_202027-02-2020114": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3716_202023-12-202055": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_678_202002-06-20201373": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2425_202030-09-20201696": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_650_202006-11-2020248": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_107_201911-10-20194126": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3390_201925-10-20191547": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_128_202013-03-202039": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_76_202014-01-20201989": "GRANTED", + "Bail_115_201907-08-2019412": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_159_202025-02-2020429": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_50_202112-01-2021783": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_43_202111-01-2021796": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1937_202002-09-20202470": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1675_201917-05-20193972": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1727_201927-06-20191845": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_595_202019-10-2020351": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3189_201904-10-20193560": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2445_201923-07-20193189": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1621_202027-11-20202684": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_292_202015-07-2020162": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1282_202016-07-2020648": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_66_202015-01-2020347": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1178_202022-09-20203013": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_759_202005-06-20201311": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_192_201927-09-2019290": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_41_202008-01-20202020": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3250_202027-11-2020561": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_867_202115-03-2021589": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_278_202028-05-20201675": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1178_202014-07-2020702": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_900_202017-06-20201140": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_113_201911-10-20194131": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_217_202119-02-2021414": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1995_202004-09-20202391": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_18_202105-01-20213098": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1554_201901-06-20192168": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1505_201903-05-20194105": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_524_202025-09-2020465": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_97_202120-01-20212174": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_122_202118-01-20212263": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2107_201921-06-20193629": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2547_201927-07-20193121": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2622_202007-10-20201560": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_396_202019-08-2020171": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_240_202007-07-2020196": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_249_202120-01-20212195": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3356_201906-11-20191336": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1183_202022-09-20203016": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_262_202019-03-202038": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_48_202112-01-2021781": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1149_202007-07-2020815": "GRANTED", + "Bail_161_201909-10-20191989": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_400_202107-04-202174": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1517_201931-05-20192191": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_441_202031-08-2020600": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1185_202131-03-2021260": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_159_202128-01-20212945": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1946_201907-06-20193727": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3238_201915-10-20191876": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_450_202029-05-20201400": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_284_202105-03-2021285": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_546_202001-10-2020427": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3093_202012-11-2020766": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1114_202112-04-202149": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2924_202004-11-2020942": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3174_201909-10-20191985": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_300_202109-03-2021251": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_252_202105-02-20212897": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2535_202008-10-20201510": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_788_202004-08-20201556": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_239_202115-01-20212338": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_546_202003-07-20201632": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_583_202017-10-2020357": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2990_201925-09-20192412": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_353_202009-06-20201637": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_138_201918-10-20194080": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_522_202111-02-20211402": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_742_202122-02-20211067": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_580_202111-02-20211416": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_355_202103-02-20211672": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1162_202022-09-20203008": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4103_201923-12-201955": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_164_202024-01-20201303": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_976_201926-11-2019122": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3293_201922-10-20191640": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_576_202106-04-20212638": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1690_202013-08-2020236": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3373_201912-11-20193386": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1087_202026-06-2020950": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_351_202005-08-202088": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2910_201903-09-20193720": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2789_202022-10-20201201": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1915_201906-06-20193742": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2047_202014-09-20202183": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_37_202007-01-2020393": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2309_201909-07-20193429": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_12_202011-02-2020723": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_424_202117-04-202111": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_21_202005-02-20201904": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_623_202029-10-2020316": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_477_202104-02-20211640": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1935_202028-08-20202571": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2611_201901-08-20193072": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1566_201907-05-20194081": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_313_202115-03-2021225": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3363_201902-11-20191374": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_67_202018-02-2020164": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1518_202013-08-2020223": "GRANTED", + "Bail_7_202028-01-20201258": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1712_202014-12-20202643": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_333_202029-07-2020107": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2054_201917-06-20193666": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3398_201912-11-20193396": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3161_201909-10-20193537": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4107_201903-01-20201783": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_131_202013-03-202042": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_41_202111-01-2021794": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1318_201916-05-20192589": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3066_201925-09-20193605": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_257_202115-01-20212340": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2423_201920-07-20193234": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2242_202014-09-20202204": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1948_201907-06-20193729": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_34_202011-02-20201881": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_605_202021-10-2020333": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_499_202016-09-2020517": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2842_201917-09-20192528": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_412_202101-02-20211739": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2926_202003-11-2020986": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1643_201915-05-20194006": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1094_202014-09-20203055": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1167_201901-05-20192904": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_86_202014-01-20201994": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_416_202021-08-202021": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1694_202025-08-20208": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3096_201927-09-20193592": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_454_202003-09-2020582": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_666_202015-07-20201599": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_87_202013-02-2020657": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_403_202019-08-202036": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_757_202123-02-20211033": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2397_201919-07-20193252": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_610_202115-02-20211336": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_717_202117-02-20211304": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_21_202112-01-20213066": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_839_202019-08-20201521": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_607_202027-05-20201453": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6_202001-02-20201914": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_888_202112-03-2021628": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2162_202014-09-20202196": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2676_202013-10-20201427": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1903_202004-09-20202381": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_61_202118-01-2021721": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_363_202003-03-2020275": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_144_202103-02-2021570": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2474_202030-09-20201703": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_970_202115-03-2021606": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_321_202023-07-2020136": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_48_202108-01-20212470": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1551_201919-06-20191972": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1254_202008-07-2020795": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_59_202015-02-2020182": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1539_202024-07-2020523": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_963_202110-03-2021677": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1495_202022-07-2020591": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_18_202005-02-20201902": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_37_202108-01-2021809": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_86_202113-01-20213060": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1026_202004-09-20203080": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1015_202112-03-2021641": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2588_202015-10-20201351": "DENIED", + "Bail_114_201927-07-2019647": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2748_202022-10-20201196": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1069_202009-09-20203069": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3641_202023-12-202045": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1617_202004-08-2020368": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_142_202102-02-2021599": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1910_202002-09-20202464": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_66_202105-01-20213104": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_109_202016-01-20201977": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_289_202026-02-2020409": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_539_202017-03-202094": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2341_201910-07-20193406": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2607_202013-10-20201417": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1272_202005-10-20202929": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3168_201909-10-20193539": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_208_202025-02-2020438": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3989_201920-12-201987": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1788_201925-05-20193877": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1833_202027-08-20202596": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3141_201909-10-20191982": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1341_201916-05-20192593": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_655_202016-07-20201590": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2929_201905-09-20193693": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2276_202006-10-20201576": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_188_202028-01-20201929": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2006_201923-07-2019787": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2213_201902-07-20193560": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2461_201916-08-2019207": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_404_202019-08-202037": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2155_202015-09-20202141": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2400_201921-08-201972": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_147_202018-01-20201442": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2613_202014-10-20201377": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_133_202017-03-202015": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_837_202019-08-20201519": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1734_202020-08-2020154": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_507_202018-03-202078": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_528_202002-07-20201633": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_269_202013-07-2020176": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3276_201918-10-20191739": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3562_201907-11-20191317": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1441_201906-06-20192117": "GRANTED", + "Bail_146_201929-08-201912": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_36_202007-01-2020392": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_668_202002-06-20201370": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_214_202119-02-2021413": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_266_202013-07-2020173": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3357_201924-10-20191582": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1981_202001-09-20202525": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_200_202119-01-20212235": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2374_201918-07-20193293": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_95_201901-10-20194179": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_429_202102-02-20211705": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_691_202118-02-20211240": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_369_202014-08-202062": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1269_202107-04-202199": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1146_201909-05-20192691": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1743_201922-05-20193901": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_229_202122-02-2021400": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2_202008-01-20201676": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_173_202110-02-2021507": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1992_201930-07-2019558": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2253_201904-07-20193509": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_342_202120-01-20212205": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_359_202003-03-2020273": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2155_201923-07-2019808": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_863_202020-08-20201513": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_211_202129-01-20212927": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1006_202002-09-20203096": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1371_202024-07-2020504": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_775_202021-12-202026": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_71_202007-02-20201006": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_681_202021-07-20201587": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1650_201915-05-20194012": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3903_201911-12-2019630": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_624_202029-10-2020317": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_480_202011-09-2020541": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_965_202027-08-20203131": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2264_202016-09-20202102": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3719_202006-01-20212533": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1713_202013-08-2020243": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2714_202003-11-2020969": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1181_202023-09-20202996": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3137_201904-10-20192079": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_430_202102-02-20211706": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3443_201930-10-20191496": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_16_202008-01-20202615": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1555_201904-07-20191699": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1677_201917-05-20193974": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_882_202019-08-20201529": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_207_202117-02-2021435": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1000_202117-03-2021519": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_188_202020-02-2020477": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2124_201925-06-20193597": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_478_202011-09-2020540": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_166_202022-01-20201357": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3451_201913-11-20191185": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3304_202002-12-2020494": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3629_202017-12-2020140": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1297_202015-07-2020677": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1668_201915-05-20194015": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_878_202005-06-20201322": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_218_202103-02-20212905": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_543_202003-07-20201629": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4_202001-01-20202052": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_191_202028-01-20201931": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_532_202025-09-2020468": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1230_202112-04-202155": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2923_202029-10-20201106": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_634_202015-06-20205689": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_16_202003-01-20208376": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_716_202005-06-20201620": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_420_202102-03-20211302": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1533_201921-06-20192860": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1617_202021-07-2020774": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3634_201912-12-2019552": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_118_202010-02-20203826": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_911_202106-04-20212901": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1764_201916-07-20192047": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_4012_201908-01-20202072": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_106_202102-02-20212022": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3480_201906-12-2019739": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2273_202016-10-20201554": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_162_202013-02-20203769": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_1243_201907-05-201914506": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2347_202015-10-20201606": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1833_202010-08-2020415": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_3415_201907-11-201910707": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6_202108-01-2021707": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_792_202030-06-20205410": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2038_201917-07-20196555": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_798_202102-04-20212970": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1635_201911-07-20192351": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1081_202123-03-2021676": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_945_202017-07-20204236": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_453_202017-03-20202765": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1406_202108-04-2021148": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_550_202102-03-20213682": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1838_201923-07-20191809": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_811_202124-03-20213184": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_158_202027-01-20201746": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3067_202003-12-2020565": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_1266_201908-05-201914363": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3323_202008-01-20212614": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_3135_201917-10-201911692": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2173_202008-09-20202267": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2954_201907-11-20191687": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_779_202110-03-20211019": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_424_202123-02-20211462": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_143_202115-01-20214979": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_1786_201926-06-201911978": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2612_202003-02-20212000": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1428_202030-06-20201249": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_19_202104-02-20211934": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_718_202109-03-20211056": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3379_202012-01-20212560": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2091_201902-09-20194846": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_490_202111-02-20211749": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1471_202007-07-20201029": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_184_202120-01-20214877": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_870_202115-03-2021938": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3141_202016-12-2020189": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2353_201928-08-2019290": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3536_201912-12-2019548": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2407_202013-10-20201706": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3992_201914-01-20201968": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2560_201904-09-201915870": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1364_201922-05-20193669": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_520_202125-02-20213745": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2779_201920-09-201913146": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1123_202125-03-2021576": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_818_202124-03-20213188": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_1841_201902-07-201911636": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_1792_201927-06-201911876": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_619_202117-02-20211596": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2570_201927-09-20193063": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_28_202003-01-20208388": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1223_202015-06-20201431": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_985_202122-04-20212762": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3637_201906-12-2019754": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_3134_201921-10-201911542": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2311_202021-09-20202043": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_76_202005-02-20207012": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_222_202125-03-2021544": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1145_202010-08-20202730": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_762_202122-03-20213286": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_283_202102-02-20212041": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1470_201904-06-20193139": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3795_201913-12-2019519": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1071_202005-06-20201644": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_557_202010-09-20202191": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3461_201916-12-2019342": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2953_202001-12-2020612": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_705_202005-06-20201619": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1110_202123-03-2021679": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1014_202002-06-20201755": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2102_201923-07-20196064": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2321_202015-10-20201605": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_418_202004-03-2020345": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2672_202029-10-20201262": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2789_202009-11-20201099": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3292_202024-12-202026": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_672_202023-06-20205534": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2726_201916-09-201913502": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2729_201916-09-201913505": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1350_202008-09-20207093": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2106_201931-07-20191517": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_3509_201915-11-201910407": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1198_202107-04-2021191": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1080_202024-06-20201321": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1616_202020-10-20204788": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2937_201903-10-201912415": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2046_201919-08-2019892": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_15_202106-01-20215307": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1840_202020-11-20203730": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1123_202005-08-20202948": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2098_201923-07-20196061": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_1985_201916-07-20196587": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2761_201910-10-20192671": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_803_202124-03-20213176": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_609_202019-03-202050": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_585_202116-02-20211640": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1261_201908-05-20194237": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_809_202112-03-2021978": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_506_202118-03-2021827": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_3311_201905-11-201910840": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_44_202112-01-20212546": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3074_202004-12-2020526": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1675_201909-07-20192425": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_828_202126-03-20213036": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_47_202004-02-20207100": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_953_202112-04-20212795": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3143_201922-11-20191214": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1059_202011-06-20201445": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_402_202027-01-20207294": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_3688_201902-12-20199545": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3068_201923-10-20192153": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_266_202028-02-2020489": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1147_202013-08-20202643": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2084_201914-08-20191034": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2911_202001-12-2020610": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3205_201911-11-20191630": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_1247_201907-05-201914510": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_401_202027-01-20207293": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1191_202102-04-2021375": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1924_202019-08-2020193": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_319_202117-02-20211576": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2522_201916-09-20193750": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_1532_201903-06-201912997": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_112_202112-01-20215166": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2835_201918-10-20192352": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3748_201912-12-2019557": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_585_202104-03-20213613": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_20_202010-02-20201019": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_720_202125-02-20211402": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3007_202003-12-2020554": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1324_202003-07-20201116": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2888_201926-09-201912784": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1012_202008-06-20201563": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1197_202018-08-20202471": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_872_202119-03-2021788": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1993_202020-08-2020167": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1358_202008-09-20207101": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3800_201907-01-20202103": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3844_201918-12-2019246": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1958_201930-07-20191560": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_391_202027-01-20207283": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_594_202005-03-2020330": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_157_202120-01-20212320": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_384_202027-01-20207276": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2782_202005-11-20201181": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1273_202105-04-2021308": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_309_202023-01-20207464": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1949_202018-08-2020242": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_301_202104-02-20211949": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2118_201924-07-20195904": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_723_202018-03-2020105": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_130_202102-02-20212024": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_160_202119-01-20214925": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_911_202123-03-2021663": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_46_202004-02-20207099": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1686_201908-07-20192484": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1295_202007-07-20201021": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3389_201920-11-20191375": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_396_202111-02-20211741": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_3184_201924-10-201911345": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_943_202125-03-2021549": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_680_202107-04-2021174": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_763_202126-03-20213033": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_46_202120-02-20211530": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_1783_201926-06-201911975": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_702_202103-03-20211266": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_539_202102-03-20213672": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_452_202017-12-202081": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2008_202007-12-20203260": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3089_201925-10-20192032": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2917_202026-11-2020680": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2395_202013-10-20201704": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_574_202005-03-2020325": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1161_202014-08-20202537": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3330_202023-12-202073": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1034_202126-03-2021520": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_397_202027-01-20207289": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_28_202107-01-20215275": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_106_202113-01-20215083": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1675_202012-08-2020370": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_379_202102-02-20212054": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1259_202027-08-20207542": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_680_202118-03-20213369": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3134_201924-01-20201795": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2140_202009-09-20202227": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_3880_201912-12-20198975": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_164_202121-01-20214815": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_302_202102-02-20212043": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2076_202014-12-20202889": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1980_202003-12-20203423": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2840_202010-11-20201048": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2122_201919-08-2019899": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_268_202121-01-20212272": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1118_202007-08-20202735": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_214_202121-01-20212270": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_610_202109-03-20213507": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2696_202005-11-20201166": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_238_202125-01-20212199": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3486_201902-12-2019931": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_1579_201912-06-201912515": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1618_202020-10-20204789": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2538_202028-10-20201287": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_537_202123-02-20211470": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2862_201925-09-201912928": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3505_201927-11-20191091": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1319_201916-05-20193913": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_37_202005-02-20206996": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2110_202015-09-20202145": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2210_201901-08-20195534": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2141_202023-12-20202672": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1444_202002-07-20201186": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_581_202104-03-20213609": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_976_202120-04-20212766": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_78_202005-02-20207014": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3353_201914-11-20191549": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_52_202024-02-2020709": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_703_202123-02-20211494": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_955_202119-03-2021802": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1343_202106-04-2021263": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2860_202026-11-2020677": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3191_201905-11-20191771": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1412_202119-04-202131": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_186_202014-02-20203724": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1121_202007-08-20202736": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1973_202003-12-20203416": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_480_202123-02-20213876": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1280_202014-08-2020274": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_601_202123-02-20211477": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2223_202005-11-20201151": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1254_202026-08-20202026": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3578_201913-12-2019495": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_181_202014-02-20203719": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3161_201931-10-20191942": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3358_201906-12-2019737": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_151_202119-01-20212363": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3780_201903-01-20202193": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2773_201919-09-201913230": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_637_202015-06-20205692": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_841_202101-04-20213014": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_882_202109-03-20211069": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_756_202027-05-20201871": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_492_202111-02-20211750": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1364_202109-04-202181": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1422_201922-05-20193675": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_148_202115-01-20214984": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_3589_201920-11-201910175": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1318_202002-07-20201166": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_50_202108-01-20215214": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1673_201910-07-20192378": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_979_202120-04-20212769": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_116_202113-01-20215085": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2370_202015-10-20201609": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2346_201928-08-2019289": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_1262_201908-05-201914360": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1484_201929-05-20193392": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3330_201914-11-20191547": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_118_202024-01-20201786": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_491_202124-02-20213786": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_147_201905-08-2019201": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2014_202025-08-202060": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_3587_201920-11-201910173": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_635_202015-06-20205690": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_1757_201925-06-201912041": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1943_202018-08-2020241": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1066_202124-03-2021618": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_3559_201919-11-201910327": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_231_202102-02-20212034": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3095_202014-12-2020255": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_1365_201917-05-201913837": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_886_202115-03-2021941": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_491_202017-03-2020129": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1577_201924-06-20192810": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_690_202115-03-2021929": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_296_202103-02-20214293": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_817_202119-03-2021785": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_554_202029-05-20201812": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_1527_201903-06-201912992": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2010_201901-08-20191468": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_536_202026-05-20206014": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2470_202020-10-20201494": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1023_202023-07-20203850": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3447_201914-11-20191551": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_83_202112-01-20215139": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2587_201925-09-20193177": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_24_202003-01-20202187": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3128_202019-01-20212372": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_180_202108-02-20211850": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_4016_201927-01-20201755": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3572_201926-11-20191157": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1052_202126-03-2021521": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_660_202115-03-20213426": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_167_202014-02-2020848": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2469_201902-09-20194866": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2477_201929-08-20194558": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1590_202015-10-20205272": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2691_201911-10-20192635": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2732_201903-10-20192835": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3341_202021-12-2020135": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2040_201902-08-20191409": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3138_201905-11-20191766": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1374_202009-09-20207037": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_48_202006-02-20206906": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1465_202021-09-20206462": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1307_201928-05-20193411": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_4007_201917-12-20195712": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_54_202120-01-20212304": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_36_202003-01-20208396": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_177_202010-02-20201035": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_67_202106-01-20215319": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_303_202104-02-20214241": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1366_202009-09-20207031": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2975_202023-11-2020847": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_393_202005-03-20202896": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1037_202010-06-20201463": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_333_202109-02-20211805": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2929_202021-12-2020112": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_384_202117-02-20211582": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2728_201916-09-201913504": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_300_202103-02-20214296": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_872_202002-06-20201735": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2314_202015-10-20201603": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_185_202103-02-20211977": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_706_202118-03-20213394": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_854_202126-03-2021515": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_213_202028-01-20201697": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_576_202103-03-20213646": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_853_202004-06-20201666": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2714_201915-10-20192537": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2102_202021-12-20202752": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_1313_201914-05-201914019": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3466_201902-12-2019926": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_818_202015-02-20211682": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_288_202107-04-2021173": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_903_202119-03-2021792": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_393_202026-02-2020630": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_1549_201904-06-201912879": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_650_202118-03-2021830": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2392_201927-08-20194638": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_3297_201919-12-20195521": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1178_202102-04-2021373": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1965_202025-08-202048": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3911_201906-01-20202150": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1176_202107-04-2021189": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_395_202027-01-20207287": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3071_201922-10-20192207": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1832_202007-08-2020426": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1511_201903-09-20194744": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2813_201923-09-201913040": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2390_201922-08-20194712": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_3108_201916-10-201911802": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_146_202120-01-20212318": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1005_201903-05-20194401": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2916_201924-10-20192087": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1853_202024-11-20203604": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_478_202123-02-20213874": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2620_201927-09-20193064": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_973_202020-07-20204134": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3169_202010-12-2020368": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_984_202122-04-20212761": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3144_201921-10-20192279": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2319_202014-10-20201646": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_1867_201904-07-201911522": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_1424_201924-05-201913539": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_835_202117-03-2021878": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_258_202102-02-20214350": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_153_202014-02-2020847": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1571_202021-07-2020769": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_255_202018-02-2020782": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_659_202124-02-20211438": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_302_202104-02-20214240": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2541_202018-11-2020909": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_649_202016-06-20205616": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2086_201923-07-20196051": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1306_202108-04-2021137": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_926_202118-03-2021845": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3377_201922-11-20191228": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_987_202123-03-2021667": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_1592_201912-06-201912526": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_838_202003-07-20205171": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_1393_201921-05-201913734": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_709_202119-03-20213314": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2251_201903-09-20194748": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_997_201924-05-20193577": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1127_202007-08-20202740": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1822_201918-07-20191946": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_643_202109-03-20211049": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_522_202027-05-20206002": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2904_201925-10-20192016": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_682_202023-06-20205545": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3327_202007-01-20212646": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1712_202029-10-20204440": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_377_202111-02-20214077": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3020_202003-12-2020556": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_477_202123-02-20213873": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1043_201913-05-20194077": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3314_201927-11-20191080": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_216_202018-02-20203669": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_1152_201901-05-201914996": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1323_202002-07-20201168": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1205_202020-08-20202255": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2388_201922-08-20194710": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_3887_201917-12-20195695": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_972_202109-04-202170": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_88_202112-01-20215144": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_322_202026-02-20203310": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2929_201916-10-20192492": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1280_201916-05-20193909": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_300_202117-02-20211575": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1230_202025-08-20202090": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_685_202118-03-20213373": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1811_201901-08-20191461": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3618_201902-12-2019944": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1981_202003-12-20203424": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_799_202102-03-20211324": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_632_202103-03-20211262": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_458_202115-02-20211668": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_331_202005-03-2020306": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_30_202003-02-20201548": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3329_201911-11-20191640": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_18_202106-01-20215310": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_519_202028-05-20201844": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_808_202124-03-20213181": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3161_202007-12-2020464": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2765_201914-11-20191522": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2075_202014-12-20202888": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2065_202014-12-20202879": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2232_201927-08-2019454": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_734_202026-06-20205455": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_560_202005-03-2020320": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_294_202103-02-20214292": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1335_202106-04-2021260": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2365_201920-08-20194899": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_900_202106-04-20212892": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_27_202005-02-20201442": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_1498_201931-05-201913172": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_519_202102-03-20211306": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_296_202102-02-20212042": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2820_201916-10-20192483": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3278_201907-11-20191709": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_3023_201914-10-201911973": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3865_201912-12-2019562": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1267_202026-08-20202032": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2190_202018-09-20202092": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_145_202115-01-20214981": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2830_202010-11-20201046": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2853_201925-09-201912923": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3386_201914-11-20191550": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3058_202025-11-2020742": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_505_202111-02-20211751": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1869_202023-11-20203678": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_108_202011-02-2020969": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1655_202023-07-2020720": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1769_202013-08-2020323": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_885_202008-07-20204705": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2925_202010-12-2020353": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1433_202018-09-20206592": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_810_202112-03-2021979": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_256_202025-02-2020663": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1964_201917-07-20192005": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_523_202027-05-20206003": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3413_201903-12-2019849": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3648_201913-12-2019500": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1374_202107-04-2021207": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2474_202015-10-20201628": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3623_201903-12-2019888": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2126_201909-08-20191149": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_778_202124-03-20213171": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_74_202120-01-20212307": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_142_202020-01-20201907": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_4040_201919-12-20195553": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2115_202022-12-20202725": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1821_202011-11-20204122": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_521_202125-02-20213746": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_198_202010-01-20207896": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2498_202029-10-20201254": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_832_202101-04-20213010": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3327_201921-11-20191307": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1829_201931-07-20191506": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1281_201910-05-20194141": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2050_201909-08-20191138": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_299_202014-02-2020864": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1863_202023-11-20203672": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3188_202015-12-2020218": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2983_202024-11-2020801": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3747_201910-12-2019668": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_609_202109-03-20213506": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_678_202125-02-20211401": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_187_202009-01-20207980": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1887_202025-11-20203569": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_840_202101-04-20213013": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1129_202007-08-20202742": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_283_202027-02-2020545": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1389_202010-09-20206970": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_886_202015-06-20201406": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_361_202109-02-20214132": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_595_202105-03-20213565": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_747_202019-01-20212370": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2113_201922-08-2019638": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2826_201910-10-20192680": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_428_202111-02-20211744": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_497_202102-03-20211303": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3829_201911-12-2019618": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3236_202021-12-2020117": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_840_202006-07-20205082": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2794_202010-11-20201038": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1575_201924-06-20192809": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_438_202025-02-2020682": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_371_202111-02-20214071": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1092_202009-06-20201515": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_3556_201919-11-201910324": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2847_202025-11-2020727": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2562_202020-10-20201499": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3141_201920-11-20191358": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_748_202102-03-20211318": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2740_201903-10-20192836": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_84_202028-02-2020485": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_567_202004-03-2020355": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_1845_201902-07-201911639": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_144_202023-01-20201839": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2929_202021-12-2020113": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3654_201929-11-20191016": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1061_202011-06-20201448": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_623_202109-03-20213519": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2616_202027-10-20201348": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2124_201914-08-20191038": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1843_202020-11-20203733": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_852_202102-04-20212974": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2304_201906-09-20194304": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_612_202109-03-20213509": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1156_202008-06-20201573": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_702_202024-06-20205518": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_433_202027-05-20201862": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1755_202012-08-2020372": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2098_201909-08-20191146": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_566_202027-05-20201863": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2862_202010-11-20201049": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1276_202002-07-20201163": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2186_201931-07-20195555": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2021_202007-12-20203273": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2331_201919-08-20194977": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_549_202102-03-20213681": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3227_202010-12-2020376": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3059_202003-12-2020564": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_603_202003-03-2020415": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1113_202005-08-20202944": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3997_201903-01-20202206": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1048_202122-03-2021726": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1558_202013-07-2020855": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1249_202102-04-2021379": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_915_202112-03-2021989": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_900_202112-03-2021988": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_209_202121-01-20212267": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_539_202026-05-20206016": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2859_201925-09-201912925": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_3799_201910-12-20199225": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2491_202021-10-20201436": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_733_202119-03-2021781": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_1889_201904-07-201911534": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1226_202016-06-20201397": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_1167_201902-05-201914944": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1185_202018-08-20202462": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_170_202120-01-20212321": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3707_201924-12-20196": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1690_202027-07-2020659": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_778_202112-03-2021974": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1712_202030-07-2020548": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_621_202125-02-20211395": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_437_202017-03-20202749": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_873_202103-04-20212951": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1645_201901-07-20192687": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2989_201910-10-201912136": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_265_202102-02-20214357": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1128_202119-04-202126": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1140_202013-07-2020838": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1989_201920-08-2019787": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_124_202104-02-20211937": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3126_202010-12-2020364": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1902_202020-08-2020155": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3312_201922-11-20191223": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1056_202123-03-2021674": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1442_202018-09-20206599": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1806_202031-07-2020516": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3631_201923-12-201944": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_922_202102-04-2021357": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3872_201911-02-2020959": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2072_201923-07-20196038": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_379_202027-01-20207271": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2185_201931-07-20195554": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2746_202010-11-20201034": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_1332_201915-05-201913980": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2442_202013-10-20201712": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_819_202008-02-20211877": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3267_202024-12-202023": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2775_202005-11-20201180": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_767_202122-03-20213290": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_402_202115-02-20214009": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2466_201929-08-20194547": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_720_202119-03-20213325": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2205_201930-08-20195348": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_578_202005-03-2020327": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_1233_201906-05-201914718": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_51_202112-01-20212547": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1057_202124-03-2021614": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_1509_201931-05-201913181": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_168_202119-01-20214928": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1483_202013-07-2020849": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_3441_201911-11-201910611": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1768_201902-07-20192667": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3291_201911-11-20191638": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_927_201916-05-20193905": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_568_202003-03-2020412": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_865_202105-04-20212928": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_972_202119-04-20212777": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3335_201926-11-20191135": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1351_202008-09-20207094": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_920_202013-07-20204321": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2235_202009-12-2020392": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1381_202022-10-20204640": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2345_201920-08-20194887": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2473_201929-08-20194554": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_715_202124-02-20211441": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2629_201922-10-20192186": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_935_202119-03-2021794": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_696_202123-03-2021655": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1270_201913-05-20194094": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_993_202123-03-2021669": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1693_201903-07-20192628": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1808_202031-07-2020517": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_181_202006-03-2020279": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2_202029-01-20201666": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_712_202119-03-20213317": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_3348_201905-11-201910849": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_717_202105-04-2021280": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2059_202011-12-20203124": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2148_201916-08-2019971": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_490_202124-02-20213785": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_893_202105-04-20212943": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_75_202005-02-20207011": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1252_202026-08-20202024": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2881_202001-12-2020607": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2069_201923-07-20196035": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_837_202028-05-20201861": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_187_202121-01-20212265": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3749_201911-12-2019613": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_250_202108-02-20211855": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2088_201919-08-2019898": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2545_201921-10-20192251": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_697_202024-06-20205513": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_1957_201909-07-201911275": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1204_202015-06-20201427": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2328_202014-10-20201649": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3823_201913-12-2019525": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_492_202019-03-202043": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_108_202112-01-20215162": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2691_202029-10-20201265": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_596_202115-02-20211680": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_1954_201909-07-201911272": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_268_202102-02-20214360": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2923_201913-11-20191584": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3895_201910-01-20202007": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_373_202102-02-20212053": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2999_201919-12-2019179": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_1357_201916-05-201913883": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1498_202010-07-2020888": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2997_202007-12-2020447": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_4036_201919-12-20195549": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2339_201913-09-20193939": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_660_202118-03-2021832": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2175_201916-08-2019973": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_636_202104-03-20211212": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2123_201909-08-20191148": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1258_202105-04-2021303": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_542_202102-03-20213674": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2488_201920-09-20193458": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_728_202103-03-20211269": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_1784_201926-06-201911976": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_399_202115-02-20214006": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3484_201926-11-20191145": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2154_201930-07-20195577": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2564_201920-09-20193463": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1714_202029-10-20204442": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_685_202109-03-20211052": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1091_202010-06-20201466": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2055_201925-07-20191725": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3184_202022-12-202088": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_1245_201907-05-201914508": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1130_202007-08-20202743": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2242_202016-09-20202125": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_424_202117-02-20213969": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1796_202009-11-20204207": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2563_201904-09-201915873": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_187_202120-01-20214880": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1919_202020-08-2020158": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2231_201914-08-20191048": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2107_201931-07-20191518": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2695_201910-10-20192668": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1570_201920-06-20192897": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_635_202124-02-20211435": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_110_202120-01-20212311": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1726_202016-10-20205199": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1984_202003-12-20203427": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1466_202120-04-202124": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_647_202016-06-20205614": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_1237_201907-05-201914501": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_134_202114-01-20212470": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1856_201923-07-20191812": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_536_202002-06-20201732": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2641_202029-10-20201260": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_102_202028-01-20201685": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_504_202124-02-20213798": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_564_202103-03-20213636": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1184_202018-08-20202461": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2330_202021-10-20201428": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2088_202015-12-20202856": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_584_202104-03-20213612": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1342_201924-06-20192803": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2988_201910-10-201912135": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2741_201903-10-20192837": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_889_202110-03-20211029": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_40_202006-01-20208245": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_415_202117-02-20213960": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1331_201924-05-20193583": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2366_202016-10-20201562": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1272_202108-04-2021130": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2259_201928-08-2019283": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_213_202122-01-20214486": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_140_202119-01-20212362": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1078_201903-05-20194402": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_966_202024-06-20201320": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_199_202013-01-20207859": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_3050_201921-10-201911536": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_565_202103-03-20213637": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2454_202013-10-20201719": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1471_201931-05-20193264": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2324_201902-09-20194855": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2743_202011-11-2020999": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1497_201904-06-20193143": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_334_202104-02-20211951": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3942_201923-12-201975": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_256_202102-02-20212036": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3507_201903-12-2019862": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_186_202004-02-20201524": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_1898_201904-07-201911542": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_792_202126-03-20213034": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2385_202011-11-2020983": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_711_202018-03-2020102": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2962_201921-10-20192273": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_4011_201903-01-20202209": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_279_202104-02-20211945": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_551_202017-03-2020136": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1692_202023-07-2020730": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1819_202011-11-20204120": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1341_202017-07-2020802": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_967_202119-04-20212772": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_698_202024-06-20205514": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2735_201914-10-20192587": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2914_202024-11-2020786": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_273_202017-01-20207705": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2610_201925-09-20193182": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_669_202023-06-20205531": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2414_201917-09-20193655": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_874_202105-04-20212929": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2087_201923-07-20196052": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_208_202102-02-20212029": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_479_202123-02-20213875": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1909_202026-11-20203485": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1716_201919-07-20191879": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_103_202008-01-20208061": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3894_201906-01-20202147": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3125_202004-12-2020530": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_857_202102-04-20212979": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1837_202023-11-20203659": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2753_202023-11-2020829": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1452_201921-06-20192853": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_190_202120-01-20214882": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_194_202014-02-2020852": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3254_202024-12-202020": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2469_201929-08-20194550": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2515_202015-10-20201631": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2972_201907-11-20191688": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_226_202121-01-20212271": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_420_202117-02-20213965": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_385_202123-02-20211457": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_219_202122-01-20214492": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3003_201917-10-20192433": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2453_201911-10-20192629": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2601_202023-10-20201379": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2686_201921-10-20192253": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_895_202008-07-20204715": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2709_202007-11-20201119": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_806_202021-01-20212279": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_387_202115-02-20214002": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_591_202004-03-2020361": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_672_202006-03-2020287": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2948_201917-10-20192426": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_350_202109-02-20214124": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1918_202013-08-2020335": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3944_201904-02-20201490": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3548_201903-12-2019869": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_450_202123-02-20213850": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_102_202008-01-20208060": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_82_202104-02-20211935": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1432_201903-06-20193179": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_77_202005-02-20207013": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1139_202010-08-20202724": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_340_202023-01-20207473": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3359_201920-11-20191372": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_929_202108-04-20212827": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1039_202119-03-2021812": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_334_202025-02-2020667": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2439_201923-09-20193320": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3037_202010-12-2020359": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2071_202014-12-20202884": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3723_201920-01-20201909": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1749_201917-07-20191986": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_53_202112-01-20215134": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_530_202125-02-20211389": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2073_202014-12-20202886": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2208_201901-08-20195532": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_540_202026-05-20206017": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_514_202125-02-20213739": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_1907_201905-07-201911459": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_811_202118-03-2021835": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_303_202002-06-20201730": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3450_201926-11-20191143": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_587_202123-02-20211476": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_834_202124-03-2021608": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2213_201901-08-20195537": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_212_202102-02-20212030": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2684_201913-09-201915676": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_755_202105-03-20211152": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1298_202123-04-20211": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3310_201907-11-20191710": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_25_202106-01-20215314": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1724_202010-08-2020413": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1918_202026-11-20203493": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_3273_201931-10-201911017": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_312_202103-02-20211992": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1172_202105-04-2021293": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2777_201920-09-201913144": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2822_201904-10-20192778": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1998_202004-12-20203320": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_160_202109-02-20211794": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2360_201904-09-20194654": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1844_202018-08-2020235": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_107_202113-01-20215084": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2226_201927-08-2019453": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_825_202003-06-20201713": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_1934_201908-07-201911349": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1737_202021-08-202097": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_369_202104-02-20211955": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2104_202015-09-20202144": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_594_202104-03-20211208": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1052_202028-07-20203587": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_353_202027-02-20203183": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2774_202013-11-2020946": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_417_202013-03-20202788": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_886_202105-04-20212940": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2063_202011-12-20203128": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_521_202019-03-202045": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2108_201931-07-20191519": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1043_202016-06-20201383": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1054_202028-07-20203589": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2963_201910-10-201912132": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3236_201919-11-20191423": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2491_201913-09-20193953": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3165_202004-12-2020532": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_1859_201903-07-201911601": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_602_202112-03-2021966": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_1489_201929-05-201913312": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_197_202121-01-20214818": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2091_201923-07-20196056": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3370_202021-01-20212280": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_370_202111-02-20214070": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_95_202112-01-20215151": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_213_201905-11-2019856": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2389_201922-08-20194711": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application (Old)_2899_201901-10-201912512": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_691_202118-03-20213379": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_486_202019-03-20202643": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_939_202123-03-2021665": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1707_202029-10-20204437": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1152_202012-08-20202708": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_3064_201910-10-201912153": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_681_202019-03-202054": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_250_202025-02-20203348": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_174_202115-02-20211660": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1679_201909-07-20192426": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3906_201920-12-2019140": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2824_201922-10-20192191": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1542_201925-06-20192775": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2228_201909-08-20191155": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6_202024-02-2020708": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_81_202112-01-20215137": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_846_202029-05-20201825": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_58_202108-01-20215220": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1153_202105-04-2021289": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3326_202014-01-20212475": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2899_201905-11-20191760": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3384_202006-01-20212701": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_644_202018-03-202089": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_742_202104-03-20211221": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3387_202024-12-202034": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1594_202013-07-2020860": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1718_202029-10-20204446": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3933_201903-01-20202198": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1382_202006-07-20201083": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2668_202027-10-20201353": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2392_202014-10-20201665": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1540_202010-07-2020896": "DENIED", + "Bail Application (Old)_1557_201904-06-201912887": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1859_202023-11-20203668": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3127_202007-01-20212640": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_868_202110-03-20211027": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1230_202101-04-2021408": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_793_202030-06-20205411": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_3112_201927-11-20191068": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_1568_201921-06-20192861": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1412_202015-09-20206825": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2836_202009-11-20201104": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_545_202110-03-20211014": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2394_201929-08-2019136": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2799_201925-10-20192013": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_48_202007-02-20201315": "DENIED", + "Bail Application(Old)_2216_201919-09-20193506": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_348_202026-02-2020625": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_178_202007-02-20201331": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2041_202009-12-20203201": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_278_202119-01-20212712": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4864_201902-01-20202472": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_145_202005-02-20201456": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1769_202015-07-2020632": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_874_202126-02-20211594": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3567_202021-10-20201195": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_244_202119-01-20212698": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1195_202118-03-20211016": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2798_202002-09-20202443": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4648_201910-12-2019656": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4112_201907-11-20192125": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2712_202002-09-20202425": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2455_201909-07-20192092": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4256_201915-11-20191686": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_91_202022-01-20201875": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2995_202017-09-20206673": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2839_201909-08-2019732": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1761_201920-05-20193426": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3810_202012-11-2020699": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2628_201924-07-20191281": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1061_202115-02-20215940": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1058_202004-06-20201750": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4253_201921-11-20191317": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_790_202103-02-20216645": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4016_202003-12-2020411": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2041_202126-03-20213975": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4801_201906-02-20201361": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_94_202021-01-20201931": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_130_202014-01-20202159": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2160_202007-08-20202856": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_431_202101-02-20212416": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2050_202015-07-2020644": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2207_201902-07-20192381": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3564_202019-10-20201278": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1110_202004-06-20201757": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2101638_201912-09-201912244": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_169_202006-02-20201389": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1735_201920-05-20193425": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2900287_201913-12-20198581": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3662_202003-11-2020907": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4008_202004-11-2020887": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_33_202013-01-20202183": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1699_201918-05-20193446": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1202_202005-06-20201719": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3841_202027-10-20201092": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_14_202013-01-20202181": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3596_201904-10-20194954": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2170_202004-08-2020556": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1689_202009-07-2020812": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_488_202025-02-2020650": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2503_201915-07-20191655": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2233_202004-08-2020563": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2102044_201930-10-20199728": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1520_202101-04-2021489": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2611_202002-09-20202411": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2134_202004-08-20202985": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2805_202002-09-20202446": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_939_202030-05-20204941": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3729_201914-10-20194596": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1291_202013-07-2020710": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3603_201918-10-20193915": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3612_201917-12-2019208": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_121_202004-02-20201488": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2442_201909-07-20192088": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1498_202106-03-20214973": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2765_202002-09-20202434": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2101730_201920-09-201911001": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_465_202013-03-2020143": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4344_202004-12-20203563": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3043_202021-09-20201912": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3180_202023-09-20201855": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2430_201909-07-20192081": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4101_201911-11-20192019": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2166_201921-06-20192639": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2101767_201924-09-201910873": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1339_202122-03-2021859": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_21_202119-01-20212679": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_118_202012-02-2020990": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1779_201928-05-20193215": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2277_202014-08-2020322": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1440_202103-03-20215051": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3812_201918-10-20193926": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4313_202003-12-20203627": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1425_202109-04-2021117": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1949_201907-06-20192894": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3412_201923-09-20195475": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_116_202018-01-20201990": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_756_202002-07-20201018": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2699_201925-07-20191228": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1714_202109-04-2021138": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4375_202014-12-2020213": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3798_202029-10-20201001": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1917_201917-06-20192710": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4433_201921-11-20191336": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_52_202105-01-20218109": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2096_201919-06-20192665": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1403_202001-07-20201065": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_59_202111-02-202128": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4080_202012-11-2020717": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1456_202018-06-20201386": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2078_202101-04-20213903": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4595_201918-12-2019164": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2947_201910-10-20194775": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2608_202020-08-2020175": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3565_201923-10-20193300": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_158_202031-01-20201606": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3057_202016-09-20202073": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2809_202021-09-20201902": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2601_202004-09-20202325": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1676_202108-04-2021176": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2795_202007-09-20207085": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_634_202006-03-2020305": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4341_201929-11-20191045": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3626_201916-10-20194253": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1901_202010-07-2020771": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1221_202009-06-20201626": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2953_201916-08-2019578": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2900296_201913-11-20199382": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2921_201908-08-2019787": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4786_201907-01-20202361": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4324_202010-12-2020303": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_677_202018-03-20202616": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1884_202123-03-20214169": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_219_202011-12-2020141": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_139_202031-01-20201602": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2107_202102-04-20213831": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2137_201925-06-20192555": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2844_201907-08-2019834": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1851_201901-06-20193053": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4353_201918-11-20191527": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1803_201924-05-20193308": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2908_201913-08-2019695": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4547_202018-12-202098": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4747_201919-12-2019120": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2744_202003-09-20207260": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_140_202028-01-20201641": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4644_201913-12-2019542": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1150_202003-06-20201807": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3320_202012-10-20201404": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4241_202002-12-2020483": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4525_202024-12-20206": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3402_202007-10-20201528": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3602_202022-10-20201167": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1098_202005-06-20201702": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3790_201917-10-20194101": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3825_201922-10-20193510": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2382_201909-07-20192073": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2513_201922-07-20191371": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1039_202123-03-2021775": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_971_202119-03-2021942": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2076_202020-08-2020132": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_22_202004-02-20201475": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2200718_201920-11-20199174": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1120_202125-03-2021634": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000_201903-10-20195004": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4620_201912-12-2019580": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3339_202006-10-20201577": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3410_202019-11-20203951": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4191_201913-11-20191881": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3252_202029-09-20206137": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_428_202101-02-20212413": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1167_202119-03-2021947": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_944_202118-03-20211008": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_286_202018-02-2020836": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2101005_201913-06-20198497": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1879_202122-03-20214299": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2099_202017-07-2020589": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2527_201908-07-20192154": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_194_202010-02-20201096": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1057_202003-06-20201797": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3076_202017-09-20202026": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2456_202018-08-2020240": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1768_202115-04-202162": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1390_202123-03-2021803": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3081_202021-09-20206468": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7_202004-01-20202386": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4205_202023-11-2020588": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1495_202008-07-2020848": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_58_202111-02-202127": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2693_202002-09-20207375": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2924_202011-09-20202102": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_78_202017-01-20202030": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2002_201914-06-20192752": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1128_202116-03-20211162": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4218_201913-12-2019530": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1369_202025-06-20201218": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2146_201926-06-20192527": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4026_201931-10-20192683": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1877_202010-07-2020769": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_537_202006-03-20202849": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_221_202019-02-2020764": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2900128_201916-05-20199182": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1838_202006-07-2020964": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2401_202025-08-202052": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2087_201928-06-20192477": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2226_201926-06-20192531": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2136_202004-08-2020537": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2897_202011-09-20206841": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1575_201910-05-20193708": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3611_202014-10-20201371": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2557_201924-07-20191276": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2909_202007-09-20202290": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2102355_201910-12-20198659": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_936_202029-05-20201884": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000220_201901-10-201910548": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1868_201924-07-20191273": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_276_202024-01-20201756": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_168_202030-09-2020345": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_164_202125-01-20212536": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_560_202117-02-20211955": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2006_202125-03-20214036": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4282_202003-12-2020432": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3799_201917-10-20194104": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1313_202125-02-20215347": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3472_202006-10-20201599": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1023_202111-02-20216087": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1705_202108-04-2021189": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2100_202016-07-2020621": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1344_202018-01-20212789": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1405_202102-03-20215168": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_722_202009-11-20204237": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3724_202028-10-20204714": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1826_202009-07-2020820": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_41_202009-01-20202263": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2900305_201920-11-20199178": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3728_201914-10-20194595": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2118_201910-07-20192028": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2994_202011-09-20202110": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4727_201911-12-2019619": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3456_202006-10-20201597": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2102342_201909-12-20198694": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2727_202008-09-20202227": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2058_202014-07-2020702": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1776_202118-03-20214469": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2200656_201930-10-20199732": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_535_202021-08-20202133": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4534_201902-12-2019974": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4156_201905-12-2019825": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2200793_201917-12-20196881": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2460_202018-08-2020241": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2190_202105-04-20213781": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4579_201905-12-2019847": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3601_201904-10-20194955": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2708_201920-08-2019421": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2509_201924-09-20195383": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_718_202115-02-20212012": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_943_202108-02-20216338": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1089_202115-02-20215963": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2710_202028-09-20206188": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_258_202022-01-20201909": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2841_202004-09-20202345": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2998_202017-09-20206676": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4385_201923-01-20201829": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3547_202012-10-20201421": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2407_202021-08-202095": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2253_201908-08-2019770": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1845_202122-04-202126": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1218_202117-03-20211100": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_480_202005-03-20202906": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_156_202021-01-20201934": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3756_202023-10-20201133": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2356_202115-04-20213334": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2214_202010-08-20202748": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1727_202029-06-20201159": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_565_202104-02-20212328": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_802_202020-03-202017": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2278_201926-06-20192535": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_379_202019-02-2020781": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4580_201910-12-2019653": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_548_202007-03-2020226": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3793_202027-10-20201084": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3762_201916-10-20194264": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2144_202017-08-2020263": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2232_202031-07-2020566": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1985_201918-06-20192685": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_467_202104-02-20212307": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1568_202105-04-2021354": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3818_202003-11-2020917": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4458_201927-11-20191184": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4245_201915-11-20191683": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2383_202012-08-2020430": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_377_202019-02-2020780": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4233_201903-01-20202396": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1791_202007-07-20203601": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4499_202016-12-20202883": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1737_202030-06-20201134": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1013_202111-02-20216077": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1433_202016-06-20201461": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1690_201916-05-20193514": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4376_201902-12-2019964": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3412_202006-10-20201582": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3465_202009-10-20205729": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1924_201901-06-20193057": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3001_202011-09-20202112": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1922_202018-08-2020223": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4471_201928-11-20191135": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3106_201928-08-201987": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3915_201925-10-20192993": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2763_201929-07-20191114": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1332_202024-06-20201242": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2639_201918-07-20191513": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3689_201902-11-20192371": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3347_202030-09-20201673": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_938_202029-05-20201886": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2978_202017-09-20202016": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_81_202118-01-20212759": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3848_201922-10-20193515": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2654_202003-09-20202364": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2749_201919-08-2019489": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3826_201916-10-20194278": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2431_202122-04-20213272": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3905_202002-11-2020969": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_49_202114-01-20212893": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4545_202018-12-202096": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2828_202002-09-20202453": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2861_202008-09-20207046": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_62_202004-02-20201479": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2416_201908-07-20192149": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2193_201925-06-20192559": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1145_202017-06-20201402": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2913_201927-08-2019132": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1680_202009-07-2020810": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1972_202016-07-20203206": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3981_201931-10-20192677": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1464_202023-06-20204143": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_198_202118-01-20212767": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4182_202023-11-2020578": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4889_201903-01-20202421": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1221_202122-02-20215596": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1309_202119-03-2021971": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1500_201909-05-20193776": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2245_202007-08-2020508": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4158_202003-12-2020418": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2311_202017-08-2020280": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_754_202011-06-20201529": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4438_202014-12-2020219": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1637_202001-07-20201079": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_722_202027-05-20201915": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2439_201908-08-2019771": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_67_202117-02-202121": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3379_201925-09-20195329": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3034_202023-09-20201841": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3998_202006-11-2020848": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2900_202009-09-20202194": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2260_201901-07-20192416": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3849_202006-11-2020826": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4453_202011-12-2020289": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2126_202017-07-2020592": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_240_202022-01-20201898": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1870_201903-06-20193000": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_609_202125-02-20211640": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_36_202007-01-20202356": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3640_202028-10-20201037": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2009_201918-06-20192688": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2326_202012-08-2020415": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2086_202101-04-20213909": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3024_202018-09-20206579": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2224_201925-06-20192566": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3597_201910-10-20194778": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1854_202010-07-2020768": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3399_201924-09-20195396": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_901_202105-02-20216462": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1531_202026-06-20201185": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3177_201919-09-20195627": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2031_202013-07-2020747": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3895_202017-11-2020665": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2033_202028-08-20202466": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1584_202102-04-2021444": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2983_202014-10-20201349": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3804_201916-10-20194277": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2271_202108-04-20213552": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3570_202013-10-20201389": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1107_202001-06-20201867": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4385_202010-12-2020314": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4425_202010-12-2020326": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4605_201905-12-2019860": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3970_201911-11-20192009": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1665_202106-04-2021305": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4214_202005-12-2020360": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1693_202117-03-20214564": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4583_202022-12-202057": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2740_201923-07-20191337": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_369_202122-01-20212602": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1116_202109-03-20211316": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2689_202025-08-202073": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2366_201906-07-20192179": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_677_202110-02-20212146": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2429_202122-04-20213270": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_367_202018-02-2020860": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3879_202002-11-2020963": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4205_201918-11-20191508": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3499_202020-10-20201226": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3095_201928-08-201984": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1871_201903-06-20193001": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2362_202020-08-2020144": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4455_201921-11-20191338": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1215_202024-06-20201239": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4222_202024-11-20203805": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1927_202010-07-2020777": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1511_201906-05-20193960": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1225_202026-06-20201171": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3062_202018-09-20201982": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4342_202002-12-20203734": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1636_202103-04-2021412": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_453_202103-02-20212340": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_482_202115-02-20212001": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_677_202102-04-20213816": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2041_202014-07-2020701": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_125_202014-01-20202155": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2385_201904-07-20192304": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1243_202018-06-20201369": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2107_201914-06-20192796": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2607_201924-07-20191279": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_157_202005-02-20201458": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2018_202004-08-20202911": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2352_201904-07-20192291": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_80_202005-02-20201444": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2705_202002-09-20202423": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3745_201914-10-20194603": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3910_202002-11-2020971": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1692_202117-03-20214563": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2499_202021-08-202098": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2102330_201906-12-20198754": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3739_202028-10-20201040": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_279_202028-01-20201649": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1199_202005-06-20201716": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2986_202010-09-20202155": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2999_201921-08-2019381": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1780_202122-04-202114": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1965_201910-06-20192835": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4814_201903-01-20202409": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_949_202125-02-20211668": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1582_202030-06-20203908": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1255_202118-03-20211032": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1498_202106-04-2021278": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_627_202110-02-20212134": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4029_201931-10-20192687": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_176_202114-01-20212904": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3460_201920-09-20195574": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_805_202027-05-20201920": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_317_202113-01-20217671": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_544_202005-03-2020347": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3969_201922-10-20193529": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2670_202002-09-20202419": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2276_201911-07-20191982": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3444_202009-10-20205714": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2743_202003-09-20207259": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_674_202127-01-20216990": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2238_201902-07-20192387": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_390_202026-02-2020566": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2101986_201922-10-20199883": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2541_201925-07-20191209": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3502_202019-10-20201277": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1811_202010-07-2020764": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_77_202010-01-20202227": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3714_202020-10-20201260": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4235_201905-12-2019827": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1443_201906-05-20193953": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1441_202124-03-2021722": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_993_202106-03-20211345": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3181_202023-09-20201856": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1898_202016-07-2020608": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1516_202006-07-2020938": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2779_201901-08-20191050": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4241_202002-12-20203688": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1015_202019-06-20201338": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3010_202016-09-20202062": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1682_202118-03-20214434": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2102263_201904-12-20198850": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2645_201920-08-2019419": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2303_201905-08-2019923": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2026_202126-03-20213961": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2931_202010-09-20202143": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2117_202105-04-20213738": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2810_201920-09-20195552": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_300_202005-03-2020333": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2543_201915-07-20191662": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3031_201903-10-20195006": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4526_202024-12-20207": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3474_202015-10-20201321": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3611_201920-11-20191367": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3660_202015-10-20201341": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4839_201924-12-201912": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_344_202122-01-20212587": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2425_202020-08-2020151": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1002_202012-06-20201494": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_647_202110-02-20212141": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3648_202015-10-20201337": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2763_202002-09-20202432": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1640_201916-05-20193499": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3932_201906-12-2019782": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1644_201924-05-20193288": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1764_202006-07-20203674": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1067_202106-03-20211350": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_927_202103-03-20211409": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1564_201909-05-20193785": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2102118_201913-11-20199372": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1259_202123-02-20215480": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000323_201921-11-20199133": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2189_202007-08-2020496": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3878_201921-11-20191308": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1755_202118-03-20214450": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1456_201907-05-20193884": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1113_202002-06-20201833": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2157_201918-06-20192694": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3138_202021-09-20201924": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1475_202124-03-2021728": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1798_202115-04-202172": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2867_201909-08-2019734": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_577_202021-03-20204": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1895_202123-03-20214174": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3037_201926-08-2019194": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_552_202027-02-2020530": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1572_202102-04-2021438": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4189_201905-12-2019826": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4381_202010-12-2020311": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1725_202009-07-2020817": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1343_202016-06-20201455": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4456_202022-12-202040": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_284_202112-01-20217775": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_628_202110-02-20212135": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4357_201929-11-20191047": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4713_201924-12-20197": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3982_202006-11-2020842": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2397_202013-08-2020384": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3804_202029-10-20201005": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3208_202024-09-20201800": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_545_202028-08-20207432": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2774_202004-09-20207177": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2211_202010-08-2020442": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1333_202126-03-2021582": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2706_202002-09-20202424": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3675_201922-10-20193505": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_892_202122-02-20211820": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_512_202105-02-20212271": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_179_202114-01-20212906": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1667_202002-07-20201041": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_165_202113-01-20212956": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2102310_201905-12-20198794": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3109_202022-10-20201152": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1677_202116-03-20214733": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2791_202018-09-20201970": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3108_202017-09-20202037": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2202_201925-06-20192562": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3614_202023-10-20201122": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3955_201925-10-20193002": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4253_202004-12-20203558": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_808_202123-02-20211741": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2223_202010-08-20202756": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_631_202111-02-20212080": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1850_202006-07-2020966": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_812_202010-06-20201568": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_669_202127-01-20216985": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2900132_201921-05-20199004": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_844_202012-06-20201490": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_241_202005-02-20201462": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1081_202116-03-20211152": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1287_202017-06-20201411": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3816_202029-10-20201009": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3608_201923-10-20193301": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3548_202012-10-20201422": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4227_202023-11-2020597": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2616_202028-08-20207465": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2361_202020-08-2020143": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4382_201902-12-2019966": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2314_201902-07-20192393": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4480_202015-12-20202939": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2487_202014-08-2020342": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4132_201911-11-20192024": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3623_202022-10-20201169": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1807_201928-05-20193219": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2426_201909-07-20192079": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2687_201925-07-20191220": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3858_201925-10-20192979": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2651_202027-08-20202507": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2349_202012-08-2020426": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_187_202004-02-20201496": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1219_202002-07-20201020": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3099_201906-09-20196403": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_704_202018-03-202055": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2243_201925-06-20192572": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_866_202011-06-20201531": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1960_202008-07-2020880": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4598_202022-12-202060": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2173_202012-08-20202649": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3655_202021-10-20201203": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3034_202017-09-20206697": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_295_202018-02-20203497": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000300_201911-11-20199473": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1616_201914-05-20193605": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1416_202123-03-2021806": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_158_202028-01-20201642": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4344_201921-11-20191322": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4635_202024-12-202013": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1471_202124-03-2021726": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3092_202016-09-20202084": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_158_202122-01-20212571": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1201_202005-06-20201718": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3044_202018-09-20206589": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4138_202012-11-2020743": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3263_202029-09-20206144": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1823_202003-07-20201014": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1027_202112-03-20211242": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1391_202102-03-20215156": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4605_202023-12-20202627": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1758_202115-04-202157": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1647_201915-05-20193557": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_950_202108-02-20216344": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3912_202005-12-2020356": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4091_202012-11-2020719": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1691_201921-05-20193372": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2253_202108-04-20213536": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_303_202021-01-20205038": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1785_202115-04-202166": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1937_201901-06-20193059": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4647_201910-12-2019655": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_422_202127-01-20212513": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1973_202016-07-20203207": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4322_201923-11-20191245": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1166_202025-06-20201211": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1196_202005-06-20201714": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1580_202102-04-2021443": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2334_202012-08-2020418": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3395_202007-10-20205862": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1633_202014-07-2020670": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4494_201929-11-20191066": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2821_202002-09-20202449": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1510_202102-04-2021427": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2059_201914-06-20192774": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2295_201903-07-20192346": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4816_201919-12-2019133": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1600_201909-05-20193795": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2504_201911-07-20191993": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1602_201909-05-20193797": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3687_201918-10-20193919": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2436_202026-08-202011": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_194_202027-01-20201692": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3431_201909-10-20194855": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_803_202103-03-20211401": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1862_201930-05-20193116": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_534_202027-02-2020526": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2654_201923-07-20191331": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3012_202016-09-20202063": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4244_201915-11-20191682": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3647_201915-10-20194420": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3653_201913-11-20191861": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2011_201914-06-20192756": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4472_202011-12-2020292": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1539_202010-07-2020757": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2591_201918-07-20191508": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4287_201918-11-20191517": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3060_202016-09-20202076": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1946_202016-07-20203190": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3214_202023-09-20201875": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1575_202030-06-20201113": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1094_202112-03-20211259": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2163_201925-06-20192557": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2426_202014-08-2020335": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1412_202015-06-20201479": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2658_201923-07-20191334": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1997_202013-07-2020742": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1025_202017-06-20201398": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1795_202119-03-20214366": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2789_201907-08-2019827": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4494_202015-12-2020171": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3600_201915-10-20194417": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4629_201909-12-2019715": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2656_201901-08-20191039": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1300_202010-06-20201593": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4542_202006-01-20213132": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4217_202022-12-202033": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2310_201908-07-20192142": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3178_202021-09-20201937": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4568_201930-11-20191012": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3019_201930-08-20196599": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3936_202003-11-2020935": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2605_202021-08-2020114": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_725_202115-02-20212015": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3174_202021-09-20201934": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1153_202119-02-20215721": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1545_202026-06-20201186": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2637_202027-08-20207556": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_85_202009-01-20202270": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1320_202119-03-2021975": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1218_202025-06-20201215": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_376_202125-01-20212543": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_731_202020-03-202012": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3816_201918-10-20193929": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2794_202002-09-20202441": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2700_202007-09-20202267": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3694_201917-10-20194089": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3980_201923-10-20193332": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2901_202009-09-20202195": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2491_201911-07-20191988": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2826_201929-08-201914": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4209_201915-11-20191678": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1899_202013-07-2020728": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2245_201905-07-20192222": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_338_202101-02-20212401": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_871_202122-02-20211812": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_912_202030-05-20201873": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1971_202124-03-20214105": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1956_202014-07-2020687": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3535_202009-10-20201463": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3026_202018-09-20201979": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1009_202102-03-20211504": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1280_202122-03-2021852": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2223_201902-07-20192384": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2900247_201918-09-201911143": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1801_202115-04-202175": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2102444_201924-12-20196714": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2155_201918-07-20191487": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_78_202111-01-20213032": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1922_202123-03-20214196": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4222_202023-11-2020594": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4818_201917-12-2019237": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_756_202115-02-20212030": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3995_201916-11-20191586": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3613_202015-10-20201329": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1169_202122-02-20215575": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3930_201925-10-20192996": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_183_202016-10-2020312": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2102039_201930-10-20199724": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_83_202111-01-20213035": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2203_202106-04-20213689": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3505_202022-10-20201158": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4261_201915-11-20191689": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1400_202012-06-20201521": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1212_202005-06-20201721": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_465_202104-02-20212305": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2057_202101-04-20213887": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2883_202009-09-20206968": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1536_201910-05-20193706": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_491_202110-02-20212120": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3817_201918-10-20193930": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_357_202119-01-20212730": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2898_202010-09-20206892": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_178_202114-01-20212905": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_637_202017-03-20202647": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3973_202019-11-2020630": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1204_202126-03-2021576": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1151_202119-02-20215719": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5_202008-01-20202315": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3358_202029-09-20201736": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4529_202018-12-20202826": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3058_201931-10-20192662": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1540_202105-04-2021351": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_816_202104-02-20216523": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3755_201930-10-20192819": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2738_201919-08-2019488": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2200614_201917-10-201910038": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2960_201927-08-2019136": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3109_201929-08-201927": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2242_202026-08-20206": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1244_202122-02-20215612": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_260_202118-01-20212783": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3725_201914-10-20194592": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1178_202116-03-20211179": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2003_202017-07-20203155": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1922_201903-06-20193012": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1694_202013-07-2020715": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2123_201928-06-20192478": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1076_202003-06-20201798": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1434_202026-06-20201175": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4175_201907-11-20192147": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_167_202012-02-20203725": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3632_202015-10-20201332": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3623_201904-10-20194964": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1487_202003-07-2020997": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_105_202006-02-20204556": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1192_202010-06-20201581": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4414_201928-11-20191129": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_733_202117-02-20211974": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1658_201915-05-20193560": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3220_202003-10-20201625": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2934_202008-09-20202250": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3983_201922-10-20193531": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1121_202003-07-2020991": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103_202008-01-20205373": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3283_202030-09-20206069": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1043_202112-03-20211243": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4174_202011-12-2020266": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1728_202108-04-2021196": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4165_201907-11-20192139": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2925_202023-09-20201838": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2101765_201924-09-201910871": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_570_202012-03-2020171": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_532_202007-08-20202782": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3803_201911-10-20194710": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_635_202111-02-20212081": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2257_201902-07-20192389": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2151_202004-08-2020546": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1894_201914-06-20192744": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2106_202016-07-2020624": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1316_202003-07-2020994": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2900275_201910-10-201910277": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_513_202120-01-20217267": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_71_202017-01-20202028": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1597_201914-05-20193600": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1018_202018-06-20201365": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1653_201915-05-20193559": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2127_201903-07-20192331": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_705_202021-10-20204999": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1231_202118-03-20211021": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1813_201906-06-20192930": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2384_202017-08-2020283": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4065_201907-11-20192112": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1613_201914-05-20193604": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1748_201921-06-20192622": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_533_202007-08-20202783": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3045_202016-09-20202069": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1495_201907-05-20193886": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3433_202007-10-20201533": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2769_202004-09-20207173": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3509_201927-09-20195232": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2644_201923-07-20191325": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1759_201928-05-20193205": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1437_202123-03-2021808": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2101005_201913-06-20198482": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1714_201907-06-20192875": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3631_202015-10-20201331": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_216_202010-02-20201099": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3790_202004-12-2020370": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3922_202004-11-20204453": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3953_201901-11-20192487": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4477_202014-01-20212918": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2446_201905-07-20192235": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2631_201923-07-20191324": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3186_202012-10-20201402": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_23_202105-01-20213160": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3959_202020-11-2020613": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2344_202012-08-2020422": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2100_201914-06-20192794": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2040_202015-07-2020643": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3883_202017-11-2020664": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_17_202006-02-20201375": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_795_202018-06-20201359": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3745_202028-10-20204717": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1749_201928-05-20193203": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1651_201914-05-20193611": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1922_202014-07-20203307": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2101661_201912-09-201912260": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_129_202014-01-20202158": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_804_202119-02-20211888": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2900213_201931-07-20194845": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_988_202009-06-20201612": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_888_202123-02-20211753": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1644_202008-07-2020858": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_532_202018-03-202046": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_483_202122-01-20217138": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2444_201909-07-20192090": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2200759_201904-12-20198866": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_508_202009-07-2020797": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_687_202129-01-20216870": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2401_201915-07-20191650": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4658_201911-12-2019613": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_460_202027-02-2020508": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_119_202005-02-20201450": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_511_202125-01-20217038": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2101067_201926-06-20198198": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2200637_201922-10-20199906": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4424_202011-12-2020284": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1401_202126-03-2021587": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1133_202112-03-20211272": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3058_202016-09-20202074": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4295_201920-11-20191380": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1782_201924-05-20193302": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4364_201922-11-20191281": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1217_202118-03-20211018": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4491_202015-12-2020170": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4012_202009-11-20204293": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_169_202021-01-20201935": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2428_202002-09-20207327": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4311_201928-11-20191122": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4640_201921-01-20201956": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3744_201915-10-20194432": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_245_202115-01-20212866": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1101_202015-06-20201472": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2911_201913-08-2019696": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4207_201919-11-20191442": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2456_201923-07-20191321": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_871_202104-02-20216553": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4193_202021-11-2020609": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_119_202022-01-20201877": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_780_202126-03-2021572": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3820_202002-11-2020960": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1881_201903-06-20193004": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3629_201906-12-2019781": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1896_201914-06-20192745": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2020_202014-07-2020699": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2443_201909-07-20192089": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3344_201923-09-20195467": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1550_201908-08-2019767": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1144_202023-06-20201273": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1230_202123-03-2021782": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2565_201910-07-20192049": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2580_201916-07-20191609": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_81_202005-02-20201445": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3069_202018-09-20206610": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3742_201915-10-20194430": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_759_202115-02-20212032": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_338_202025-02-2020609": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1750_201924-05-20193297": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1030_202103-03-20211419": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_525_202006-03-2020280": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_207_202019-11-2020174": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3996_202006-11-2020846": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_946_202125-02-20211666": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3758_202027-10-20201081": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3045_201929-08-201922": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_22_202007-01-20202355": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4432_202011-12-20203404": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4349_202004-12-2020395": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1639_201910-05-20193720": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3901_201924-10-20193170": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3708_202027-10-20201076": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1141_201907-05-20193875": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1117_202003-06-20201805": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2217_201904-07-20192278": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1956_202015-07-20203261": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2721_202003-09-20207241": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_903_202105-02-20216464": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2101814_201926-09-201910782": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4852_201901-01-20202513": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1155_202116-03-20211172": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1875_201929-05-20193168": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3303_202029-09-20201722": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1121_202112-03-20211270": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2728_202003-09-20207246": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1035_202102-03-20211523": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3137_202021-09-20201923": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_543_202026-08-20201942": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1946_202009-07-2020828": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2684_202025-08-202072": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1054_202115-02-20215935": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1282_202023-06-20201281": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3118_202018-09-20201991": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1994_201914-06-20192751": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4628_202005-01-20213177": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2239_202107-04-20213641": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2860_202017-09-20202010": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3752_202022-10-20201178": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2704_202002-09-20207385": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_186_202101-02-20212397": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4086_202017-11-2020679": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2201_201902-07-20192380": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4651_202001-01-20213223": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_898_202106-02-20216366": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2499_201915-07-20191653": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1855_202016-07-2020607": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1241_202025-06-20201216": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_615_202005-03-2020375": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_609_202125-01-20217071": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1699_202109-04-2021134": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1585_202026-06-20201190": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_242_202005-02-20201463": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1396_202012-06-20201520": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4565_202011-02-20216105": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1156_202116-03-20211173": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3659_202006-11-2020817": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1204_202005-06-20201720": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2798_202009-09-20206946": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3854_202004-11-20204432": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1409_202023-06-20201290": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3831_202028-10-20201052": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_109_202111-01-20213054": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1061_202103-03-20211428": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1682_201916-05-20193509": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1591_202013-07-2020711": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2340_202013-08-2020366": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_760_202123-02-20211736": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1273_202117-03-20211109": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_595_202006-03-2020297": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1060_202008-06-20201653": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1573_201920-05-20193409": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2880_202011-09-20202100": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_546_202029-02-2020442": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2346_202013-08-2020367": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2512_202018-08-2020247": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_446_202127-01-20212516": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4116_201911-11-20192022": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2802_202002-09-20202445": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_728_202011-06-20201528": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1701_202014-07-2020674": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4295_202002-12-2020495": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1670_202024-06-20201264": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_436_202108-02-20212188": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_978_202102-03-20211489": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4777_201902-01-20202459": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_535_202122-01-20217141": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2698_201902-08-2019996": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2731_202003-09-20207249": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2151_201921-06-20192637": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1851_202122-03-20214278": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2751_201931-07-20191085": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_241_202118-01-20212777": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2404_201919-07-20191443": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2581_201915-07-20191663": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4420_202016-12-2020132": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4417_202014-12-20202972": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3965_201901-11-20192488": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2987_202011-09-20202108": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2538_202025-08-202061": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3740_202021-10-20201212": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3205_201924-09-20195387": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4083_201911-11-20192018": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1778_202122-04-202113": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_117_202014-01-20202150": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2101235_201910-10-201910273": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2934_201914-08-2019633": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1239_202118-03-20211025": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_742_202104-02-20216517": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_345_202027-01-20201710": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3369_202030-09-20201683": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3690_202002-11-2020953": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1248_202003-07-2020992": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4560_202022-12-202047": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_747_202115-02-20212025": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1549_201920-05-20193406": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1259_202101-04-2021473": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3720_201914-10-20194588": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2964_202017-09-20206666": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1741_201929-05-20193157": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1974_201917-06-20192716": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2475_201905-07-20192239": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4508_202015-12-2020175": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_940_202108-02-20216335": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_147_202017-01-20202044": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_135_202106-01-20218036": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3576_201917-10-20194083": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1468_202105-04-2021347": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3476_202008-10-20201503": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4522_201904-12-2019898": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_678_202012-03-2020183": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4471_202015-12-2020166": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3025_202017-09-20206694": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2100865_201913-05-20199270": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_622_202007-03-2020231": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_315_202024-01-20201768": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1289_202118-03-20211036": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2149_201918-07-20191486": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1055_202002-07-20201019": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_440_202105-02-20212263": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2100861_201910-05-20199299": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1750_202109-04-2021145": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3115_201929-08-201930": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3000234_201904-10-201910390": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1794_201930-05-20193104": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3689_202020-10-20201252": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1280_202009-06-20201634": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1659_202001-07-20203882": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2227_202007-08-2020505": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1959_202016-07-20203194": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4141_202014-12-2020200": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_842_202001-06-20201845": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1621_202007-08-2020473": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2741_202003-09-20207257": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1428_202024-06-20201247": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2876_202009-09-20206963": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_401_202125-01-20212546": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1983_201914-06-20192747": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4063_201919-11-20191435": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2354_202020-08-2020141": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3809_201925-10-20192976": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2900299_201913-11-20199385": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2969_201920-08-2019425": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3935_201918-10-20193944": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_811_202004-06-20201734": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_849_202103-03-20211402": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2447_202026-08-202012": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2741_202007-09-20202270": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1380_202123-03-2021800": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2511_201902-08-2019990": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_149_202107-01-20217929": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4403_201920-11-20191392": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4695_201913-12-2019552": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1818_202003-07-20201011": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4038_202020-11-2020616": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_791_202119-02-20211883": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2753_201901-08-20191045": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2633_201905-08-2019927": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2458_201906-08-2019870": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3795_201931-10-20192667": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4306_201920-11-20191382": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_636_202017-03-20202646": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4462_202010-12-2020337": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_613_202108-02-20212211": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2150_201926-07-20191164": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2191_202106-04-20213680": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1879_202004-08-2020527": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1466_202105-04-2021346": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_182_202023-01-20201813": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1443_202103-03-20215054": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1630_201902-07-20192370": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4281_201913-11-20191889": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2846_202004-09-20202347": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2614_201919-07-20191459": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2592_202027-08-20207548": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_269_202119-01-20212707": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1877_201930-05-20193118": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2791_201907-08-2019828": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1794_202007-07-20203604": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1119_202116-03-20211159": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3405_202006-10-20201581": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3289_201913-09-20196245": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_368_202030-01-20201626": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_120_202028-01-20201640": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_702_202017-03-202089": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4390_202010-12-2020316": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2752_201909-08-2019727": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1502_201909-05-20193777": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4074_201901-11-20192503": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_995_202102-03-20211496": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_575_202011-06-20201527": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_832_202122-02-20211801": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2033_202126-03-20213967": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4232_201909-12-2019695": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4356_201921-11-20191324": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3878_202003-11-20204491": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1690_202108-04-2021183": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4219_201911-11-20192031": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2736_201928-08-201970": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4183_202019-11-2020660": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2453_201912-07-20191947": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2236_202026-08-20205": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4788_201920-12-201986": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_83_202105-02-20216426": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3507_201901-11-20192476": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2234_202107-04-20213637": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_946_202108-02-20216341": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_114_202020-02-2020707": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_175_202113-01-20212958": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3480_202020-10-20201224": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_946_202018-06-20201360": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2923_202011-09-20206849": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2996_202029-09-20201706": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1408_202019-06-20201350": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4619_201909-12-2019710": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_933_202101-03-20211570": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4383_202010-12-2020313": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_604_202006-03-2020299": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_71_202108-02-20212185": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3813_202029-10-20204661": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3064_202017-09-20202024": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3836_202028-10-20201053": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2762_202005-09-20207125": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_456_202101-02-20212423": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2018_202125-03-20214044": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3719_202006-11-2020820": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2703_202002-09-20202421": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4563_202022-12-202049": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1659_201916-05-20193501": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1983_202017-07-20203137": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1259_202008-06-20201674": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_195_202010-02-20201097": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1657_202106-04-2021302": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1381_202122-03-2021872": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3500_202019-10-20201275": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1224_202012-06-20201503": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1587_202026-06-20201191": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1711_201920-05-20193419": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3860_202029-10-20201014": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_896_202001-06-20201853": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1764_202118-03-20214458": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1116_202002-06-20201836": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2168_202105-04-20213765": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1816_202006-07-2020959": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_79_202010-02-20201076": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1821_202007-07-2020905": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4548_201904-12-2019905": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4696_201913-12-2019553": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000178_201917-09-201911218": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3291_201913-09-20196246": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3501_202019-10-20201276": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1307_202011-06-20201554": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1836_202027-08-20202495": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1789_202119-03-20214364": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3817_202029-10-20204662": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1338_202016-06-20201454": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4570_202005-01-20213168": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3711_202027-10-20201077": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4554_202022-12-202046": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_191_202114-01-20212909": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2571_201917-07-20191549": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3438_201926-09-20195280": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2954_201916-08-2019579": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2422_202018-08-20202402": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4285_201918-11-20191515": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2968_202017-09-20202015": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_897_202001-06-20201854": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_807_202117-02-20211985": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1317_202124-03-2021702": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3082_202030-09-20201652": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2840_202011-09-20206837": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2200595_201914-10-201910225": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2222_201925-06-20192565": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3397_202030-09-20201690": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4019_202006-11-2020852": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3024_201904-10-20194939": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_67_202005-02-20201440": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4010_201913-11-20191868": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4360_201921-11-20191325": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2266_202010-08-2020450": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_178_202021-01-20201939": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4035_201915-11-20191670": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1569_201914-05-20193596": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4498_201929-11-20191069": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3900_202004-11-2020871": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2354_201904-07-20192293": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_679_202012-03-2020184": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2067_201926-06-20192525": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2659_202025-08-202069": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2537_201915-07-20191661": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3495_202008-10-20201504": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3099_202021-09-20206477": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_673_202111-02-20212094": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4289_201928-11-20191120": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3561_202027-10-20201072": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1484_201921-05-20193368": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1973_201910-06-20192840": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_941_202011-06-20201532": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1506_202125-03-2021659": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_200_202115-01-20212856": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1975_202124-03-20214108": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1806_202002-07-20201055": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3418_202007-10-20205875": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1382_202012-06-20201519": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3649_202003-11-2020906": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4177_201907-11-20192149": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_473_202025-02-2020647": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2200800_201923-12-20196745": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1795_201903-06-20192992": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4572_202018-12-2020107": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3637_202020-10-20201242": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_359_202122-01-20212594": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4258_201913-11-20191888": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3208_201913-09-20196226": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3107_202021-09-20206483": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2585_202021-08-2020108": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2984_202016-09-20206781": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4832_201902-01-20202466": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1678_202116-03-20214734": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3600_202020-10-20205133": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2102148_201915-11-20199289": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2294_202020-08-2020137": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1283_202015-06-20201474": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3989_201930-10-20192832": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3019_201929-08-201920": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4168_201907-11-20192142": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1870_202013-07-2020724": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1945_202008-07-2020877": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3282_201913-09-20196239": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_909_202106-02-20216368": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2406_202014-08-2020329": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_919_202010-06-20201573": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2944_202016-09-20206748": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_127_202115-01-20212850": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4343_201921-11-20191321": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1151_202112-03-20211279": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1398_202122-03-2021875": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4627_201909-12-2019713": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_505_202006-03-2020275": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1092_202112-03-20211257": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1152_202119-02-20215720": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4666_201913-12-2019545": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4107_202012-11-2020729": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4676_201928-01-20201655": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4469_201909-12-2019699": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2569_201922-07-20191375": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1589_202016-07-2020602": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4037_202017-11-2020672": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4866_201924-12-201918": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3562_201913-11-20191860": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1798_201924-05-20193307": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_400_202127-01-20212510": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4823_201902-01-20202464": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3000190_201918-09-201911150": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_437_202003-03-20202969": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1726_201920-05-20193424": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_691_202115-02-20212008": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1721_202109-04-2021140": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2093_202102-04-20213824": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2131_201901-07-20192408": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3901_202007-11-2020803": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_772_202103-03-20211398": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_259_202118-01-20212782": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2200755_201903-12-20198898": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1634_202014-07-2020671": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4893_201909-01-20202277": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_275_202024-01-20201755": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2403_201919-07-20191442": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_218_202027-01-20201693": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3288_201913-09-20196244": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1675_202116-03-20214732": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_783_202122-02-20211794": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2968_202016-09-20206765": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1527_202004-07-2020974": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1107_202106-03-20211352": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4085_201918-11-20191503": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2200769_201907-12-20198720": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1586_201914-05-20193599": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2427_201918-07-20191492": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3730_202020-10-20201265": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4502_201905-12-2019839": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1548_202025-06-20204077": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2988_201926-08-2019190": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_831_202119-02-20211904": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3640_201914-10-20194583": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2549_202019-08-2020203": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2102154_201915-11-20199290": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3882_201925-10-20192986": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1519_201908-05-20193838": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2423_201909-07-20192078": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1071_202005-06-20204798": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1090_202002-06-20201831": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3965_202009-11-2020780": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3372_202012-10-20201406": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3980_202004-11-2020884": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4420_201929-11-20191057": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1964_201910-06-20192834": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1810_202010-07-2020763": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_360_202122-01-20212595": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1675_202007-07-2020898": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3191_202028-09-20206190": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2101847_201904-10-201910383": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1643_202106-04-2021298": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2200761_201905-12-20198801": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4143_202017-11-2020683": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_324_202030-01-20201616": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4036_202009-11-2020788": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2956_202016-09-20206756": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1905_202013-07-2020729": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_87_202010-02-20201079": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1854_202122-03-20214280": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3753_202021-10-20201213": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_328_202120-01-20212659": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_301_202120-02-20211854": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2343_201905-07-20192228": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_577_202007-09-20207067": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2314_202018-08-2020233": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1860_202007-07-2020912": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_494_202028-02-2020466": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2671_201925-07-20191214": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2091_201914-06-20192788": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1362_201916-05-20193493": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1142_202012-06-20201498": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_308_202018-02-2020841": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3038_201926-08-2019195": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3625_202020-10-20201239": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2596_202027-08-20207551": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2022_202013-07-2020745": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1528_202026-06-20201183": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4149_202002-12-2020467": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2065_202014-07-2020704": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2293_201908-07-20192140": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4504_201929-11-20191073": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4798_201909-01-20202274": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1420_201921-05-20193366": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3774_201918-10-20193924": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_107_202013-01-20202193": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000210_201924-09-201910887": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_664_202127-01-20216980": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1311_202023-06-20201284": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4681_202005-01-20213191": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1421_202017-06-20201427": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2852_202008-09-20207039": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3843_202028-10-20201054": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1809_202030-06-20201142": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3309_202006-10-20201574": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3924_202003-11-2020932": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3012_201922-08-2019306": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2795_202002-09-20202442": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3184_201907-09-20196364": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1446_202103-03-20215057": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3286_202028-09-20201762": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1741_202115-04-202155": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_666_202108-02-20212216": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_906_202029-05-20204979": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2102098_201911-11-20199458": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_671_202111-02-20212093": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4853_201924-12-201913": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2770_201925-07-20191234": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210955_201914-06-20198461": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3530_202012-10-20201416": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1002_202126-02-20211609": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_334_202019-02-2020777": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2595_202025-08-202065": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_219_202110-02-20212115": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2129_202004-08-2020535": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2547_201916-07-20191602": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3130_202001-12-2020507": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1706_201922-05-20193341": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1944_202017-08-2020259": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2796_201906-08-2019881": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3739_202027-10-20204797": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4770_201919-12-2019123": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4774_201923-12-201956": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4342_201920-11-20191388": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_419_202101-02-20212411": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2396_201905-07-20192232": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4144_202017-11-2020684": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1314_202012-06-20201511": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3271_202006-10-20201571": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1655_202105-04-2021373": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2092_201914-06-20192789": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1477_202126-03-2021592": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1759_202003-07-20201004": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2726_201927-07-20191128": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4564_201905-12-2019844": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1733_201921-05-20193373": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_232_202130-01-20212464": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2100864_201910-05-20199302": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3954_202003-11-2020939": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3182_202029-09-20206126": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1452_202107-04-2021228": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_619_202127-01-20216958": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4254_201913-11-20191887": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4333_202001-02-20212437": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2032_202007-08-2020484": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_144_202017-01-20202043": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2239_201915-07-20191645": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1783_202115-04-202165": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1649_202109-04-2021125": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_838_202008-06-20201644": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2900249_201918-09-201911144": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1299_202009-06-20201638": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_475_202005-03-20202903": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2427_202019-08-20202290": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4085_202003-12-2020413": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_167_202018-01-20201993": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_931_202108-02-20216328": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2724_201916-08-2019569": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1572_202026-06-20204020": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3435_202007-10-20201534": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1842_201930-05-20193113": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3814_201915-10-20194435": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2613_201919-07-20191458": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1278_202123-02-20215494": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_539_202006-03-2020285": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_895_202125-02-20211654": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1331_202125-02-20215363": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2124_201910-07-20192029": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1420_202018-06-20201383": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3432_202007-10-20201532": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2492_201911-07-20191989": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3883_201901-11-20192486": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2302_202028-08-20202472": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_132_202106-01-20218034": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1414_202102-04-2021425": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_436_202025-02-2020632": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2900178_201904-07-20197975": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2896_201927-08-2019131": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1912_202007-07-2020923": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2535_201916-07-20191600": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2391_201906-08-2019869": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4868_201903-01-20202417": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2606_202028-08-20207455": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4037_201930-10-20192834": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2034_201910-06-20192853": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_238_202022-01-20201896": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3373_202030-09-20201686": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1097_202005-06-20201701": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3589_201917-10-20194085": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1564_202101-04-2021499": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2881_202010-09-20206888": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_308_202023-01-20201828": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_965_202126-02-20211605": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2046_202020-07-2020574": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_424_202110-02-20212117": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1938_201906-06-20192946": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3528_201916-10-20194251": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_388_202115-01-20217523": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2220_201907-08-2019824": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_342_202125-01-20212540": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1796_202122-04-202119": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4805_201903-01-20202407": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2339_202115-04-20213322": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2021_202015-07-2020638": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2479_202013-08-2020389": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2200674_201931-10-20199689": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_883_202123-02-20211751": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1857_202122-03-20214282": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4442_202011-12-20203410": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2926_201914-08-2019630": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2624_202028-08-20207473": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_834_202105-02-20216434": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4133_201916-12-2019266": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1814_202010-07-2020765": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2325_201928-06-20192482": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4290_202003-12-2020435": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2325_202012-08-2020414": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2756_202004-09-20207162": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2451_202020-08-20202251": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2947_202021-09-20201905": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_214_202002-12-2020154": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2296_201916-07-20191588": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3568_201903-10-20195020": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4223_202020-11-2020624": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2143_201911-07-20191980": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1274_202118-03-20211034": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3369_202006-10-20205979": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3411_202020-10-20201221": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1828_202008-07-20203537": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3670_201922-10-20193504": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4046_201911-11-20192014": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1601_201909-05-20193796": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_526_202109-02-20212175": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_810_202003-06-20201768": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1501_202115-04-202147": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2101630_201912-09-201912236": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_836_202125-02-20211646": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2012_201914-06-20192757": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1650_202026-06-20201196": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1518_201915-05-20193543": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2101735_201920-09-201911004": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3910_201923-10-20193323": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1692_201920-05-20193415": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4522_202016-12-2020141": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3878_202029-10-20201021": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2900136_201927-05-20198827": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_54_202109-02-202136": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4599_202022-12-202061": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1631_202030-06-20203932": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2476_201915-07-20191652": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1802_202008-07-2020868": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2265_202010-08-2020449": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1657_202013-08-2020354": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1342_202122-03-2021862": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3247_201913-09-20196236": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2181_201919-06-20192670": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1863_202122-04-202135": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3667_201916-10-20194256": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2755_202016-09-20202047": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3780_202002-11-2020958": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_348_202122-01-20212591": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1189_202118-03-20211015": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_113_202022-01-20201876": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2101734_201920-09-201911003": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2308_201901-08-20191033": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_986_202009-06-20201611": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4333_201913-12-2019533": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3440_201924-09-20195405": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_401_202116-01-20217477": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4767_201918-12-2019175": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3144_202018-09-20201994": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_221_202118-01-20212770": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2600578_202010-09-20206907": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2473_201910-07-20192040": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1047_202003-06-20201791": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_199_202122-01-20212572": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2271_202012-08-20202666": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_484_202005-03-2020339": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3979_202019-11-2020631": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1394_202017-06-20201423": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4252_202011-12-2020269": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4098_202009-11-2020793": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3160_202023-09-20206400": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4134_201911-12-2019603": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_312_202122-01-20212578": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4290_201928-11-20191121": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4905_201923-01-20201832": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2267_202010-08-2020451": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_886_202122-02-20211816": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1453_202126-03-2021589": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3173_202024-09-20206299": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1374_202122-03-2021871": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1163_202029-06-20201144": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1426_202017-06-20201430": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1505_202101-04-2021485": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2173_202004-08-2020559": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_470_202018-03-202043": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1884_201903-06-20193006": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1034_202102-03-20211522": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4760_201917-12-2019232": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2101839_201901-10-201910536": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1727_202109-04-2021143": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_860_202027-05-20201929": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1805_202119-03-20214375": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_126_202014-01-20202156": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_285_202024-01-20201758": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_98_202113-01-20212943": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3977_202026-11-2020527": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3319_202030-09-20206092": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4317_202004-12-2020390": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1774_202001-07-20201095": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3528_202014-10-20201356": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4062_201901-11-20192499": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1263_202117-03-20211107": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3500028_201931-08-201912463": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2185_201921-06-20192647": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1196_202118-03-20211017": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4282_202002-12-20203715": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2241_202107-04-20213643": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_292_202119-01-20212719": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3000161_201912-09-201912263": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1725_201920-05-20193423": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_736_202111-02-20212102": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3633_202022-10-20201170": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1047_202103-03-20211421": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2987_201920-08-2019432": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3165_202023-09-20201851": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1581_201910-05-20193709": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1492_202105-03-20214992": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2900294_201913-11-20199380": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4174_201907-11-20192146": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2839_202003-09-20202394": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3672_202023-10-20201125": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1479_201930-05-20193097": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2668_201922-07-20191379": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2604_202021-08-2020113": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4708_201911-12-2019618": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3820_201919-10-20193761": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3087_202030-09-20201653": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4363_201909-12-2019696": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1424_201907-05-20193880": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1512_201909-05-20193779": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4464_202014-12-20202988": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1779_202029-06-20201162": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_52_202107-01-20213090": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4127_202003-12-2020415": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3052_202018-09-20206597": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1363_202018-06-20201375": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_120_202120-01-20212638": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_190_202118-01-20212764": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_99_202111-01-20213045": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1570_202007-07-2020895": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4384_201921-11-20191332": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1783_202030-06-20201138": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2993_202008-10-20201476": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_982_202002-06-20204900": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1713_202109-04-2021137": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2690_202025-08-202074": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2027_202126-03-20213962": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1990_202013-07-2020739": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3317_202030-09-20206091": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_640_202118-01-20217445": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_695_202122-02-20211791": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_626_202108-02-20212214": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_563_202005-03-2020352": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_987_202102-03-20211490": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_181_202027-01-20201689": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4431_202018-12-202086": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1188_202117-03-20211092": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2900272_201910-10-201910275": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3003_202017-09-20206679": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2567_201918-07-20191500": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2272_201904-07-20192282": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2829_202023-09-20201836": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2348_202012-08-2020425": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2369_201918-07-20191488": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1089_202117-03-20211083": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2445_202021-09-20201900": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4233_202002-12-2020479": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_972_202103-03-20211412": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2974_201920-08-2019427": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1847_202008-07-2020869": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4602_201909-12-2019707": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3969_202006-11-20204370": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3755_202023-10-20201132": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1784_202122-04-202116": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2348_201903-07-20192354": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3322_201918-09-20195689": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1872_202122-04-202136": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3698_201923-10-20193303": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1333_202015-06-20204442": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2992_202021-09-20201907": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_282_202027-01-20201697": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2071_202004-08-20202938": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_253_202012-02-20201006": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2906_202023-09-20201837": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3985_201922-10-20193533": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_411_202026-02-2020567": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1349_202125-02-20215380": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4229_202027-11-2020514": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1893_202007-08-2020476": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3813_202028-10-20201048": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1906_202123-03-20214184": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1268_202017-06-20201405": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4881_201924-12-201926": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1419_201915-05-20193540": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_197_202114-01-20212913": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_511_202103-02-20212353": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4515_202018-12-202091": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1550_202106-04-2021287": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_141_202022-01-20201880": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000226_201903-10-201910474": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2103_201919-06-20192667": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2750_202028-08-20202489": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_524_202005-03-2020344": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_220_202012-02-20201000": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4267_201918-11-20191513": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1427_201906-05-20193948": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1974_202009-07-2020839": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1704_202109-04-2021136": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2035_201910-06-20192854": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2067_202018-08-2020224": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2159_201915-06-20192738": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4705_201913-12-2019555": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2631_202027-08-20202504": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_378_202122-02-20211784": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_445_202119-01-20217332": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2102120_201915-11-20199284": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1792_202115-04-202168": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1662_202009-07-2020808": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_304_202119-01-20212726": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2223_202107-04-20213627": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_485_202027-02-2020512": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1578_201922-05-20193337": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2443_202019-08-2020192": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3047_202018-09-20206592": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3660_201910-10-20194780": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1862_202006-07-2020967": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3777_201931-10-20192666": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1773_202014-10-20201044": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_478_202003-03-2020279": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1777_202014-10-20201046": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2191_201906-11-2019491": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_327_202105-03-2021533": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__888_201910-06-2019807": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1374_202007-10-20201247": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__371_201916-05-2019905": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_664_202026-05-2020586": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1355_201928-08-201934": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1339_202022-09-20201944": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1832_201921-09-2019853": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_195_202018-02-2020482": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2477_201917-01-20201054": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_50_202122-01-20211488": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2284_202018-12-2020175": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_594_202115-03-2021441": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2399_202025-01-20211464": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_521_202006-03-2020174": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_241_202124-02-2021749": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1867_202013-10-20201091": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_17_202127-01-20211413": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2021_202008-12-2020522": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2061_202015-12-2020287": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1344_202025-09-20201726": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_36_202014-02-2020551": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_437_202118-02-2021938": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2038_201906-01-20201251": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__961_201912-06-2019773": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_545_202020-08-202078": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_84_202122-01-20211492": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_99_202029-01-2020876": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1492_202007-09-20202786": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1020_202018-08-2020114": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_21_202010-01-20201857": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2387_201907-01-20201237": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_249_202101-02-20211290": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_664_202122-03-2021260": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2207_201911-12-2019305": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1872_201903-10-2019737": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2313_201918-12-201986": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_123_202017-02-2020514": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1239_202026-08-202024": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1201_202003-09-20202808": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1074_202020-10-2020868": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1937_202004-01-20212158": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_229_202004-03-2020230": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_830_202120-04-202122": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1762_201924-09-2019814": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2146_201902-01-20201294": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2189_202011-12-2020423": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2210_202010-12-2020453": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2475_201914-01-20201120": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2376_201907-01-20201235": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2198_201909-12-2019349": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__978_201916-05-2019923": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_475_202018-03-202045": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1334_202006-10-20201345": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1689_202014-10-20201042": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_755_202107-04-2021156": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1681_202025-09-20201748": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_748_202012-08-2020180": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1283_202014-09-20202448": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2083_202021-12-2020107": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1402_201920-08-2019112": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_685_202106-04-2021179": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1915_202015-12-2020281": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2012_202004-12-2020590": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1830_202027-11-2020626": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_189_202019-02-2020430": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2010_201922-10-2019604": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_750_202009-07-2020301": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_508_202123-02-2021826": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_56_202018-03-202037": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_895_202013-10-20201071": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1795_201925-09-2019800": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__66_202021-01-2020977": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1994_202004-12-2020589": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2524_202001-03-2021699": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_234_202122-01-20211503": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1648_202005-11-2020744": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_21_202113-01-20211704": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_230_202017-03-202065": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_307_202018-02-2020489": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2202_201905-12-2019378": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_537_202103-03-2021598": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_183_202014-02-2020570": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_366_202103-03-2021588": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2328_202018-12-2020181": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2408_202004-01-20212174": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1727_202013-10-20201083": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_858_202016-03-2021404": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1776_202014-10-20201045": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2345_201920-12-201959": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1716_202009-10-20201149": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1951_202005-01-20212116": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1747_201923-09-2019826": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_595_202010-06-2020420": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_662_202026-05-2020585": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_611_202118-03-2021311": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1428_202014-09-20202455": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1074_201912-06-2019777": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2302_202004-01-20212169": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1696_201906-09-20191488": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2343_202015-12-2020306": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_25_202014-01-20201841": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1520_202025-09-20201736": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2183_201920-12-201948": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_222_202019-02-2020431": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__16_202014-01-20202867": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_843_202108-04-2021120": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1706_201913-09-20191157": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2422_202027-01-20211430": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1929_201904-10-2019724": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1776_201920-09-2019872": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_308_202018-02-2020490": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__958_201925-06-2019625": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1878_201903-10-2019741": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2226_201914-01-20201106": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__65_202017-01-20201024": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1819_202014-10-20201050": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2424_201928-02-2020297": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2048_202005-11-2020760": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1381_201927-08-201968": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2312_202027-01-20211427": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_985_202012-08-2020191": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2107_202009-12-2020489": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_523_202123-02-2021828": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_617_202105-03-2021552": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2244_201909-01-20201178": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_22_202127-01-20211415": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1736_202023-12-202036": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_842_202009-07-2020311": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__308_201911-06-2019786": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1838_202016-12-2020221": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2426_201903-03-2020257": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__749_201924-05-2019859": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_535_202109-04-202173": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__838_201912-06-2019771": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1403_202016-09-20202307": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1500_202009-10-20201132": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_385_202118-02-2021931": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__50_202021-01-2020975": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1603_202001-10-20201501": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1058_202008-09-20202739": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1307_202003-09-20202813": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_404_202119-02-2021894": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_758_202120-03-2021288": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1123_202014-09-20202444": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2241_201916-12-2019105": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_855_202020-04-202125": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1270_202025-09-20201723": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_911_202127-04-202145": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_844_202126-04-202155": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2113_201901-01-20201321": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1275_202016-09-20202302": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_330_202028-02-2020320": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1637_202030-09-20201590": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_204_202006-02-2020773": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1952_202015-12-2020282": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__157_202021-01-2020986": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2358_201909-01-20201180": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__156_202005-02-2020781": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2064_202027-11-2020635": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2423_202027-01-20211431": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1314_202007-09-20202781": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_349_202115-03-2021432": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1813_201925-09-2019801": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_135_202122-03-2021250": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1162_201906-08-2019239": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1635_201912-09-20191262": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_305_202013-02-2020604": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_85_202014-02-2020559": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1724_201904-10-2019704": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_858_202113-04-202144": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2259_201917-12-201994": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_474_202112-03-2021470": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_373_202017-03-202067": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1896_201923-10-2019562": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__153_202017-01-20201037": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1402_202014-09-20202454": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1822_202014-10-20201051": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1263_201913-08-2019163": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1496_202018-12-2020154": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2079_201919-12-201970": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2241_202021-12-2020111": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_111_202017-02-2020513": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_401_202028-08-20202833": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2172_202008-12-2020541": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_319_202017-02-2020526": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_231_202109-02-20211068": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1863_201909-10-2019697": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2047_202011-12-2020418": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1794_201911-09-20191343": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2489_201923-01-2020957": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2410_201906-01-20201265": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1264_202024-08-202065": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1079_202009-12-20203741": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2285_202022-12-202069": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1781_202016-10-2020977": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1687_202007-10-20201260": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1217_202021-08-202069": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2081_201902-01-20201292": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_296_202105-03-2021530": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1940_202011-12-2020410": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1573_201912-09-20191256": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_355_202119-02-2021889": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1369_201928-08-201937": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_899_202120-04-202128": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_599_202102-03-2021656": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2522_202012-01-20211765": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_708_202107-04-2021147": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__26_202017-01-20201022": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1412_202022-09-20201947": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1755_201909-01-20201176": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_490_202006-03-2020173": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1663_201918-09-2019907": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_200_202001-02-2020826": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_346_202013-01-20211713": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_795_202008-06-2020466": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_548_202010-06-2020418": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1811_201923-09-2019832": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2299_202018-12-2020176": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_194_202018-02-2020481": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2176_201930-11-2019406": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_229_202109-02-20211067": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_158_202129-01-20211355": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2050_202005-11-2020761": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1225_202021-09-20202008": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_670_202122-03-2021261": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1662_201916-09-2019943": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_373_202120-02-2021854": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1732_201917-01-20201041": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2341_202019-12-2020136": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2164_202012-01-20211749": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1677_201912-09-20191268": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_694_202117-03-2021357": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2224_201910-12-2019335": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_157_202005-03-2020201": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1177_201911-07-2019420": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1261_201905-07-2019461": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__926_201927-06-2019574": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_728_202004-06-2020502": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1637_201906-09-20191483": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_657_202116-03-2021400": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_672_202122-03-2021262": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2458_201917-01-20201053": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2250_202010-12-2020454": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2344_202022-01-20211509": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_304_202013-02-2020603": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1778_202014-10-20201047": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1287_202021-09-20202013": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1544_201906-09-20191473": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_211_202105-02-20211147": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1462_202008-09-20202755": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_490_202101-03-2021689": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_96_202105-02-20211138": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2362_201901-01-20201329": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2257_202016-12-2020249": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1767_202018-01-20211646": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2123_201901-01-20201322": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__815_201907-05-20191034": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1618_202016-10-2020970": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1993_202011-12-2020413": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1288_201909-08-2019184": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__899_201915-05-2019943": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2152_202014-12-2020323": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1289_201908-08-2019214": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_261_202018-02-2020485": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1985_202029-01-20211362": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_12_202029-01-2020869": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1526_202016-09-20202311": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1437_202029-01-20211360": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_365_202106-02-20211109": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1641_201911-09-20191328": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__119_202015-01-20201082": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2472_202021-01-20211557": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_455_202108-04-202193": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1433_201929-08-201915": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1261_202022-09-20201942": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_33_202121-01-20211541": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2510_202003-02-20211248": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1844_201904-10-2019709": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__2164_201917-01-20201042": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_937_202126-04-202159": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1420_201916-08-2019142": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_24_202006-03-2020154": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_166_202115-02-2021988": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1868_202013-10-20201092": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1856_202010-12-2020442": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_333_202017-02-2020528": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1435_201927-08-201969": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1670_201923-09-2019824": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_363_202124-02-2021762": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1173_201906-08-2019240": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__2381_201904-01-20201278": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_975_202010-08-2020208": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_13_202007-01-20201956": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_47_202029-01-2020871": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1272_201930-08-20191819": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2180_202018-12-2020168": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application__1303_201908-08-2019216": "DENIED", + "Bail Application__1454_201906-09-20191469": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_223_202020-02-2020409": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_862_202113-04-202145": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1704_202009-12-2020470": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1673_202009-10-20201140": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2049_201911-12-2019223": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1233_201905-08-2019308": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1146_202004-08-2020192": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1936_201922-11-2019491": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_432_201906-08-201938": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_875_202017-06-2020481": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_283_202118-02-2021557": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_634_202020-05-2020680": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1179_202014-08-2020134": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1931_201921-11-2019506": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_335_202024-02-2020231": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2_202101-01-2021238": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1661_201925-09-20191010": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_212_202005-08-2020156": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1393_201902-09-20191276": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_296_202103-03-2021392": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_564_202008-06-2020543": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_237_202027-08-20202282": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1567_202007-10-2020577": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1684_201927-09-2019966": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_251_202025-08-202010": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_358_202011-11-2020112": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1175_202014-08-2020130": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_220_202108-02-2021663": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1091_201911-07-2019792": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_377_202025-11-202083": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_325_202020-10-2020160": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1208_201901-08-2019363": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_329_202101-03-2021454": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_541_202015-05-2020730": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_909_201911-07-2019788": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1210_202024-08-202042": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2223_201903-01-2020828": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1482_202019-10-2020478": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1627_202023-10-2020439": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_573_202125-03-2021141": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1909_202010-12-2020131": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_974_201924-06-20191011": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1843_201925-10-2019639": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_503_202017-03-202045": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_596_202028-05-2020643": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_498_202122-03-2021190": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1766_201925-10-2019635": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_245_202021-08-202041": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1304_202025-08-202032": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_524_201924-09-2019191": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_273_202019-09-20202027": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_638_201906-12-201969": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1856_201913-11-2019535": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1066_201917-07-2019641": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1259_201901-08-2019367": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_64_202017-01-2020696": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_704_202020-05-2020694": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_568_201901-11-2019155": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_974_202004-07-2020396": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1271_201902-08-2019344": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1785_202009-11-2020312": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1099_202030-07-2020202": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1755_202011-11-2020285": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_191_202020-07-20201064": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_326_202010-02-2020410": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_260_202115-02-2021586": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_242_201902-05-2019329": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_59_202101-03-202184": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1850_201925-10-2019643": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_241_202109-02-2021643": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_518_202118-03-2021236": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1575_202014-10-2020524": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1676_202020-11-2020234": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_173_202108-02-2021656": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_781_201913-05-20191462": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_64_202101-02-2021713": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1667_201926-09-2019981": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2047_201911-12-2019221": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1331_202008-09-2020822": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1028_202007-07-2020379": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1149_201911-07-2019796": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_796_202001-06-2020612": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1267_201902-08-2019341": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2196_201919-12-201984": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_368_201908-07-2019128": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1029_202007-07-2020380": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1599_201919-09-20191101": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1314_202009-09-2020814": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_414_202003-03-2020126": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_545_202007-03-202082": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_742_202028-05-2020647": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_385_202019-02-2020277": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4_202003-01-2020334": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_103_202027-01-2020600": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1758_202002-11-2020388": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_597_201915-11-2019134": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1222_201924-07-2019482": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_49_202015-05-20201297": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2008_202001-01-2021936": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_330_202024-02-2020229": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_494_201903-09-2019238": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1946_202016-12-202070": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1679_202030-10-2020404": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2246_201903-01-2020830": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_884_201918-07-2019592": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_521_201923-09-2019206": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_862_201903-06-20191134": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_251_202117-02-2021566": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_232_202109-02-2021642": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_534_202119-03-2021218": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_30_202116-01-2021828": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1499_201902-09-20191282": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_552_202101-04-202190": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1770_201922-11-2019486": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1797_201922-10-2019733": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1378_202014-09-2020785": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1787_202018-11-2020254": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_318_202015-10-20201844": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1359_201909-08-2019237": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_253_202112-02-2021600": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2057_201931-01-2020545": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3_202023-01-2020638": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_37_202109-02-2021149": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_30_202006-02-2020161": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5_202008-05-20201339": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2268_201907-01-2020793": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_35_202111-01-2021868": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1274_202003-09-2020847": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1605_201927-09-2019957": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_256_201921-05-2019290": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_294_202117-02-2021577": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_633_202019-05-2020698": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_361_202012-11-2020108": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1718_202002-11-2020376": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1953_202022-12-202022": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_38_202119-01-2021808": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_68_202010-01-2020744": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_456_202118-03-2021227": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_468_202003-03-2020128": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1370_202013-10-2020531": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_602_201919-11-2019121": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_106_202119-01-2021817": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_324_202020-10-2020159": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1396_202014-09-2020787": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2235_201901-01-2020861": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1334_201907-08-2019261": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_423_201901-08-201962": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_31_202008-01-2020770": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_16_202111-01-2021862": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1016_202008-07-2020361": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1895_201919-11-2019513": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1699_202012-11-2020270": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_128_202022-01-2020647": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1285_201902-08-2019348": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_175_202112-02-2021591": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1058_202023-07-2020228": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_295_202018-09-2020281": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1287_201901-08-2019371": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_378_202017-02-2020323": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1601_202003-11-2020353": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2043_202005-01-2021915": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1140_202031-07-2020198": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1064_201917-07-2019639": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2034_202008-01-2021891": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1196_202010-08-2020163": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_294_201911-06-2019252": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_266_202031-08-2020371": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102_202119-01-2021813": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_653_201917-12-201944": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1564_202016-10-2020503": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_495_202003-03-2020134": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_202_202112-02-2021592": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1311_201906-08-2019293": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1610_201924-09-20191022": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2106_201909-12-2019279": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_917_202018-06-2020473": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_368_202105-03-2021362": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2017_201926-11-2019469": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_289_202117-02-2021572": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1941_201929-11-2019408": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_954_202024-07-2020218": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_228_202025-08-2020829": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1023_202010-07-2020335": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_51_202008-01-2020771": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_459_202110-03-2021306": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1826_202024-11-2020215": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1963_201927-11-2019441": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1347_202007-09-2020826": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_208_202013-08-2020993": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_207_202108-02-2021660": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1806_202018-11-2020257": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_918_201918-06-20191050": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1397_202025-09-2020659": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_902_202016-06-2020490": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_176_202109-02-2021637": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1989_202017-12-202059": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_51_202015-05-20201299": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_480_202116-03-2021262": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1260_201904-09-20191241": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_467_202024-12-2020933": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1857_202004-12-2020161": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_296_202001-10-20201937": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_20_202023-07-20201048": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1300_202031-08-2020877": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1297_201902-08-2019349": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1153_201923-07-2019495": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1291_201909-08-2019226": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_625_202018-05-2020712": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1790_202012-11-2020273": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1947_202010-12-2020135": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1329_201909-08-2019231": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_403_202001-12-20201487": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1109_201919-07-2019556": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1734_201901-10-2019921": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_859_202017-06-2020478": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_610_202105-04-202174": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_56_202014-01-2020724": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_336_202024-02-2020232": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_951_202001-07-2020434": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_199_202006-08-20201045": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1172_201919-07-2019565": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_83_202102-04-202153": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_348_202017-02-2020321": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1384_201919-08-2019158": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1177_202014-08-2020132": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1541_202001-10-2020618": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2080_201909-12-2019275": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_29_202027-01-2020596": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2059_201920-12-201971": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1004_202004-07-2020402": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_33_202007-02-2020148": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1154_201919-07-2019563": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_265_202028-08-2020376": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1193_201926-07-2019444": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1633_202016-10-2020509": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1113_202030-07-2020203": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_374_202025-11-202082": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_591_201915-11-2019128": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_274_202003-02-2020522": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_345_202012-02-2020376": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2213_201923-12-201923": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_212_202112-02-2021596": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103_202119-01-2021814": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1634_202019-10-2020482": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1467_202023-09-2020694": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_775_202030-05-2020620": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1169_202017-08-2020106": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1959_202016-12-202073": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_71_202112-01-2021856": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_12_202003-02-2020187": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1712_202021-11-2020228": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1629_202016-10-2020508": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1613_201924-09-20191024": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_483_202120-03-2021202": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_36_202023-01-2020234": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_498_201904-09-2019230": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1873_201930-10-2019613": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_167_202102-02-2021707": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_259_202016-09-20202065": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_302_202124-02-2021485": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1673_201901-10-2019910": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_499_201904-09-2019231": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1791_202012-11-2020274": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_81_202102-04-202151": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101_202107-04-202114": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1733_201901-10-2019920": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_952_201924-06-20191007": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1248_202021-08-202059": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1628_201923-09-20191052": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1658_202021-10-2020460": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1386_202016-09-2020762": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1325_202025-08-202034": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_681_202021-05-2020669": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_638_202018-05-2020715": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1337_201926-08-201952": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_553_202123-03-2021173": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_813_202006-06-2020551": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_465_202117-03-2021246": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1551_201919-09-20191093": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1135_202006-08-2020179": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_860_201903-06-20191133": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_75_202026-02-202066": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1099_201926-07-2019441": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_426_201902-08-201951": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1352_202007-09-2020829": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1117_202002-09-2020867": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_970_201925-06-2019990": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_79_202027-02-202060": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_73_202026-02-202064": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1612_202023-10-2020438": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_889_202012-06-2020505": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_549_202126-03-2021117": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1309_202027-08-2020899": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_277_202021-09-20202016": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1137_202020-08-202061": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_535_202018-03-202038": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_332_201925-06-2019193": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_385_202104-03-2021381": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7_202106-01-20211683": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1166_202013-08-2020150": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_381_202027-11-202080": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_149_202025-06-20201212": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1625_201923-10-2019696": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1713_202023-10-2020445": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1767_202018-11-2020252": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1947_201928-11-2019419": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_419_202112-03-2021286": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1914_202017-12-202054": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1440_201922-08-201989": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_737_201902-05-20191541": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1071_202016-07-2020279": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1844_201902-12-2019382": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_472_202117-03-2021247": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1051_201908-07-2019841": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2070_201929-11-2019412": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1332_202003-09-2020859": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1159_201918-07-2019610": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_178_202016-07-20201077": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1357_201914-08-2019186": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2_202106-01-2021904": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_555_202123-03-2021175": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_309_202009-10-2020206": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_45_202017-01-2020692": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1266_201931-07-2019391": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_232_202026-08-2020768": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2134_201907-12-2019307": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_637_202014-05-2020739": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_531_202007-03-202079": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1258_202024-08-202046": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_93_202005-03-202028": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1666_201923-10-2019700": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1059_202017-07-2020271": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_587_202030-05-2020618": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1121_201918-07-2019600": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_298_201912-06-2019245": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_496_202120-03-2021203": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1623_202016-10-2020507": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_220_202013-08-2020114": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1336_202003-09-2020862": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_622_202020-05-2020679": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_546_202007-03-202083": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_765_201907-05-20191510": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_362_201904-07-2019144": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1842_202002-12-2020180": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1192_202027-08-2020890": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1788_202020-11-2020236": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1354_202007-09-2020831": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_443_202025-02-2020221": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_343_202006-11-2020126": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1286_201926-07-2019449": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1165_201919-07-2019564": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_631_202019-05-2020697": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1650_202004-11-2020342": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1321_201931-07-2019395": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_794_201914-05-20191449": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_34_202112-01-2021853": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_918_202003-07-2020409": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1578_202009-10-2020563": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1406_201922-08-201981": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_224_202013-08-2020117": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_319_201919-06-2019216": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_334_202027-10-2020144": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_150_202026-06-20201211": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_190_202101-02-2021735": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_370_202010-11-20201567": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_353_201901-07-2019162": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1252_201901-08-2019366": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_200_202102-02-2021711": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_493_201903-09-2019237": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210_202103-02-2021696": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_472_202013-05-2020745": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_333_202023-10-2020146": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2019_202023-12-202017": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_20_202008-01-2020769": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_105_202119-01-2021816": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_377_202101-03-2021463": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_50_202015-05-20201298": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1596_202013-10-2020539": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1683_202002-11-2020374": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_376_202024-11-202086": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_169_202108-02-2021654": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1969_202023-12-202012": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1609_202015-10-2020514": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1453_201902-09-20191278": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_439_201906-08-201945": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1407_201922-08-201982": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1907_202004-12-2020168": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2139_201909-12-2019281": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1046_202013-07-2020327": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_748_201902-05-20191543": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_331_201925-06-2019192": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500_202008-05-2020765": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1264_202004-09-2020839": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1225_201919-07-2019568": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_335_202123-02-2021499": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_388_202020-02-2020252": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_628_202105-04-202176": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1670_201924-09-20191028": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1420_201902-09-20191277": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_741_202028-05-2020646": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_80_202119-01-2021812": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_44_202110-02-2021144": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1335_202003-09-2020861": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_460_202110-03-2021307": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_196_202111-02-2021615": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_584_201914-11-2019139": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1366_201903-08-2019328": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_348_202124-02-2021489": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_962_202007-07-2020370": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_562_201924-10-2019160": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_206_202105-02-2021675": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1992_202008-01-2021883": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_868_202012-06-2020500": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_708_202009-06-2020536": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1427_202017-09-2020753": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3_202028-01-2020209": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_345_202004-11-2020129": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1307_201905-08-2019319": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1654_202022-10-2020448": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1838_202001-12-2020193": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1106_201918-07-2019599": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1618_201923-09-20191049": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2011_202019-12-202042": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_105_202017-03-202016": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_21_202125-01-2021201": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_264_202018-09-20202041": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_972_202015-07-2020291": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_37_202010-02-2020133": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_554_202123-03-2021174": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_286_202014-09-2020316": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_348_202004-11-2020131": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_464_202112-03-2021296": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1241_201931-07-2019386": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1230_202017-08-2020116": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1446_201922-08-201990": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1322_202031-08-2020878": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_484_201902-09-2019249": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1191_201927-09-2019955": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_244_202003-09-20202184": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_455_202008-05-2020763": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1466_201929-08-20198": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_767_202029-05-2020637": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_391_202020-02-2020255": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1155_201917-07-2019658": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2133_201907-12-2019306": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_482_202119-03-2021215": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_339_202109-03-2021315": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_331_202027-10-20201712": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1437_201903-09-20191257": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1584_202012-10-2020552": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_561_201924-10-2019159": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1781_202006-11-2020337": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1824_202001-12-2020190": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2071_202006-11-20202881": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1574_202008-09-20201949": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1497_201915-07-20192693": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1126_202005-08-2020251": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2211_201923-09-20191862": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_79_202007-03-2020102": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1513_202008-09-20201942": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_731_202010-06-2020663": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2244_202026-11-20202511": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2886_202011-01-20211532": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2094_202010-11-20202760": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2101_202008-10-20201383": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1788_202023-09-20201580": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_688_202102-03-20212331": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2524_201916-10-20193673": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_501_202007-01-20211579": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1770_202012-10-20203223": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2831_202004-01-20211639": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1248_202031-08-20203610": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_730_202005-06-2020728": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2360_202004-11-20201041": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2386_202015-12-20202222": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2556_202004-12-2020658": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_269_202002-09-20203595": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1357_202010-09-20203518": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_310_202105-02-2021968": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2100_202008-10-20201382": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1426_201905-07-20193215": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2518_201914-10-20191494": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2497_201915-10-20193708": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1013_202124-03-20211971": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2351_202003-11-20201090": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2037_202021-11-2020839": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1163_202107-04-20211764": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_333_202017-03-20201431": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1425_202014-09-20203485": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2784_201920-11-20193306": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_225_202028-01-20202169": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2273_202001-12-20202486": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1101_202013-08-2020163": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1137_202024-08-2020894": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1228_202031-08-20203602": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1428_202014-09-20203486": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5_202006-02-2020728": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_278_202005-03-2020130": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2518_201916-10-20193667": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2387_202005-11-20201010": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1607_201923-09-20191854": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3003_201912-12-20193045": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_508_202019-08-202083": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1539_201902-08-2019274": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1763_202017-09-20201761": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1134_202025-08-2020867": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2274_201921-09-20193992": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1068_202101-04-20211894": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1663_201930-07-2019375": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1532_202022-09-20203367": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1051_201930-05-20191705": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1154_202025-08-2020869": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1964_202029-10-20203041": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1578_202022-09-20203389": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_165_202115-01-20213370": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2231_202020-10-20201225": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2706_201911-11-20193402": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2930_201928-11-2019606": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1902_202001-10-20201466": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2007_201909-09-20192258": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_384_202122-02-2021628": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_147_202122-01-20213245": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2822_201913-11-2019854": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_67_202007-01-20202405": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1936_201906-09-20192296": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_953_202028-07-2020332": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1586_201931-07-2019330": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_316_202019-03-202026": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1695_202003-10-20203298": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2086_202007-10-20201410": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2402_202016-12-20202192": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_602_202124-02-20212450": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_796_202109-04-202143": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_450_202116-02-2021755": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_139_202024-02-20201586": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2316_201926-09-20191776": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2229_202025-11-20202541": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2309_202005-12-20202378": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_456_202110-02-20212760": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2280_201924-09-20191829": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1936_202025-09-20201561": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_870_202117-03-20212116": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2246_202021-10-20201215": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_138_202017-01-20202288": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_787_202109-03-20212230": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_812_201906-05-20192004": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1287_202013-08-2020169": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1523_202011-09-20201887": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_416_202108-02-20212851": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_807_202029-06-2020478": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1109_202025-08-2020859": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_243_202003-03-2020187": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2124_202007-11-2020956": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1994_201905-09-20192327": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2053_202006-10-20201424": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_959_202122-03-20212035": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_921_202119-03-20212094": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_687_202102-03-20212330": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_9_202011-02-2020466": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2483_201915-10-20193695": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2633_202004-12-2020660": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1058_202028-07-2020341": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_29_202104-01-20213577": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1392_202011-09-20203513": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2021_202012-10-20201339": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1626_202028-09-20203345": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2634_202017-12-2020126": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1087_202123-04-20211": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_459_202020-03-202019": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_218_202028-01-20202166": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1691_202003-10-20203296": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1132_202106-04-20211793": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_239_201927-07-20193831": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1076_202101-04-20211901": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1872_202028-09-20201527": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_392_202105-02-20212907": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1597_202002-09-20202011": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1380_202017-08-2020135": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2426_201910-10-20193751": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_588_202123-02-20212478": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_217_202029-02-2020222": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_126_202018-01-20201108": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1356_202010-09-20203517": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2710_201911-11-20193405": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_267_202007-03-2020109": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1099_202024-08-2020885": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1511_202021-09-20203395": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1171_202112-04-20211702": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_662_202006-06-2020712": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2067_201917-09-20192009": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2002_202009-10-20201359": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2104_201907-09-20192286": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2664_201905-11-20193457": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_70_202024-01-2020938": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2824_201925-11-20193256": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2468_202018-12-20202137": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_553_202123-02-20212469": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1115_201930-05-20193492": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2458_201905-10-20191621": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1114_202105-04-20211818": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1121_202010-08-2020181": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1149_202025-08-202013": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1814_201908-08-2019144": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2334_202009-12-20202337": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1349_202013-08-2020172": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1521_202004-09-20201968": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_879_202117-03-20212121": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2208_202001-12-2020725": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_223_202108-02-2021924": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1913_202028-09-20201528": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1246_202120-04-20211693": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1711_202016-09-20201800": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_113_202108-01-20213495": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1984_202021-11-2020834": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1491_202015-09-20203452": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2310_202005-12-20202379": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_269_201914-10-20195016": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2378_202004-11-20201043": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_957_202013-08-2020969": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_371_202103-02-20212986": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1002_202007-08-2020199": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1875_202006-10-20201415": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1631_202009-09-20201934": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_998_201907-06-20191617": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1072_202101-04-20211897": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2002_202003-11-20202985": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2953_201929-11-2019583": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_689_202102-03-20212332": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1793_201905-08-20192343": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1367_202017-08-2020128": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1761_201901-08-20192391": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1376_202010-09-20203526": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1512_201916-07-20192671": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2429_202024-11-2020793": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_659_202004-06-2020747": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1421_202014-09-20203481": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2093_202021-10-20201206": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2389_202005-11-20201012": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1146_202105-04-20211822": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_805_202005-06-2020730": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_897_202117-03-20212129": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_886_202117-03-20212128": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1372_202010-09-20203522": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1251_202010-08-2020187": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2770_201918-11-20193342": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_52_202106-01-20213535": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_106_202107-01-20213517": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1164_202026-08-2020846": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_833_202116-03-20212151": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1639_202003-09-20201990": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2088_202007-01-20213519": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2110_202023-10-20201175": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1468_202018-08-2020111": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_522_202117-02-20212604": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1858_202019-10-20203111": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_260_202003-03-2020188": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_209_202022-01-20201012": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_235_202030-01-20202118": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_12_202017-01-20202639": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2089_202009-11-20202804": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2090_202009-11-20202805": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1099_201918-07-2019564": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_976_202006-08-20201007": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1221_201909-07-20191274": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_847_202116-03-20212155": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1271_202003-09-20203589": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2320_202007-12-20202358": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_218_202007-03-2020106": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_484_202118-02-2021701": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1215_202112-04-20211708": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3232_201923-12-201915": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1671_202001-10-20203312": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_991_202001-07-2020438": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1918_201906-09-20192294": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_714_202008-06-2020705": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1378_202010-09-20203528": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1748_202012-10-20203218": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_300_202129-01-20213121": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_907_202120-03-20212061": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_877_202117-03-20212119": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_90_202107-01-20213506": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_707_202122-03-2021260": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_999_202007-08-20201004": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2021_201918-09-20191974": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3076_201920-12-20192531": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1870_201931-08-20192436": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1388_202011-09-20203509": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1513_202019-09-20203414": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_628_202125-02-20212412": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1791_202013-10-20203198": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1872_201917-09-20192005": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1331_202014-08-2020154": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_754_202006-06-2020714": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_291_202017-03-20201426": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1108_201918-06-20191518": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2284_202002-12-20202446": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2177_201923-09-20191858": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_983_202123-03-20212001": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_29_202025-02-2020309": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2725_201913-11-20193397": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2850_201921-11-2019711": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_492_202115-02-20212666": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1692_202003-10-20203297": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2427_201917-10-20191396": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1044_202028-07-2020337": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2247_202021-10-20201216": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1963_202029-10-20203040": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_911_201904-05-20192015": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1621_201930-07-2019373": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_95_202013-02-20201665": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_163_202115-01-20213368": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2940_201909-12-20193094": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1930_202025-09-20201555": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_809_202110-03-20212204": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1139_202024-08-2020896": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1943_202029-10-20203034": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_382_202104-02-20212945": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2238_201920-09-20193994": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_850_202028-07-2020327": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1726_202019-09-20201658": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_752_202012-06-2020634": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2234_201919-09-20194041": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2854_202024-12-202024": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1453_202025-08-202036": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1142_202024-08-2020898": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2374_202006-11-2020978": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1794_201905-08-20192344": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2902_201905-12-20193130": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3006_201916-12-20192606": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_90_202115-01-20211427": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_251_202005-03-20201479": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2826_201925-11-20193258": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1403_201911-07-20191216": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1755_202018-09-20201703": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2661_202021-12-202069": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1419_202014-09-20203479": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1903_201931-08-20192441": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1945_202029-10-20203036": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_985_202124-03-20211962": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2175_202020-11-20202661": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2746_201914-11-2019829": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_44_202020-01-20201076": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_20_202108-01-20211549": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1853_201927-08-20192079": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2203_201920-09-20191929": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2094_201909-09-20192262": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3375_201927-11-2019780": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2564_201920-09-20192432": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1511_201901-07-20191789": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_81_202103-02-20211309": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2066_201931-08-20193060": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2118_202027-11-2020360": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2186_201904-10-20192101": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2327_202001-01-20211857": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2878_201916-10-20191850": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1503_201901-07-20191787": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_785_202101-04-2021147": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1972_202026-11-2020371": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_742_202022-07-2020254": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1283_201906-06-20192321": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3223_201915-11-20191153": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_369_202012-03-202081": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_322_202028-02-2020278": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_819_202020-06-2020466": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2607_201928-09-20192237": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2554_201925-10-20191588": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1639_201903-07-20191731": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1375_201902-07-20191756": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_318_202105-03-2021647": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2912_201920-11-2019969": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1986_202013-11-2020485": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3310_201903-12-2019622": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1981_202002-12-2020304": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1378_201914-06-20192161": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_665_202105-04-202168": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_351_202007-03-2020111": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2205_202018-12-202090": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3144_201920-11-2019980": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_602_202125-03-2021212": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1425_202024-09-20201685": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_49_202012-06-2020539": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1380_202007-10-20201444": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_333_202118-02-20211018": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1584_202009-10-20201394": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2027_202024-11-2020407": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_211_202020-01-20202727": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1787_201920-07-20191225": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2204_202018-12-202089": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1439_201915-06-20192141": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1947_201914-08-2019520": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1704_201906-07-20191630": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2229_202015-12-2020150": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_614_202018-12-202085": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_74_202010-02-20201867": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_79_202018-01-20201002": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_349_202115-02-20211095": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1688_201920-07-20191213": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2104_201927-08-2019112": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1735_202023-10-20201137": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2279_202004-01-20211826": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1917_202013-11-2020478": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2190_202016-12-2020129": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1289_202025-09-20201656": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1523_202023-10-20201130": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2103_202002-12-2020313": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2468_201913-09-20192714": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1945_202023-11-2020420": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1663_201906-07-20191625": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2785_201909-10-20192002": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_594_202119-03-2021376": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_904_202018-08-2020860": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_698_202011-06-2020552": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1549_202027-10-20202625": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1862_202028-10-20201099": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_653_202014-07-2020310": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_85_202028-02-2020275": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2578_201926-09-20192276": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2143_201911-09-20192781": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1221_201903-05-20193195": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_289_202004-03-2020199": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2094_202010-12-2020204": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2592_201901-10-20192188": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2150_202005-12-2020252": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_416_202011-06-2020547": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2089_202025-01-20211486": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_298_202111-02-20211142": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1806_201922-07-20191197": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1571_201906-07-20191614": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1009_202014-07-2020321": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1193_202012-10-20201340": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1955_201903-08-2019809": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_485_202013-03-202064": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1652_202008-10-20201421": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1974_202013-11-2020482": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_29_202030-01-2020763": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7_202026-02-20203264": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3148_201907-11-20191323": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1827_201930-07-2019945": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_50_202024-01-2020834": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_376_202106-03-2021618": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2045_202002-12-2020306": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_775_202030-06-2020403": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_97_202014-10-20203720": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1740_202002-12-20202219": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_479_202102-03-2021760": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_348_202014-02-2020462": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2483_201917-09-20192551": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1078_202029-07-2020202": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1976_202025-11-2020389": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1951_202011-11-2020509": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1197_202105-04-20211893": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2653_201928-09-20192241": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3046_201916-11-20191097": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2276_202023-12-202022": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_980_202004-08-2020151": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2199_201921-08-2019308": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1173_201924-05-20192622": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2109_201930-09-20192211": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_15_202119-01-20211568": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1270_202024-09-20201676": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3528_201911-12-2019399": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2752_201901-11-20191458": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1773_202027-10-20201112": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_963_202119-04-20218": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1846_202023-12-20201928": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1972_201917-08-2019439": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1576_202029-10-20202578": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_496_202105-03-2021658": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1158_202008-09-20203350": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3048_201923-11-2019855": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_112_202102-02-20211342": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_235_202109-02-20211195": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3129_201930-11-2019678": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2061_202011-12-2020195": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1927_202019-12-202060": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_647_202116-03-2021473": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_389_202015-02-2020439": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_695_202122-03-2021296": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2028_202023-11-2020425": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1330_202007-10-20201440": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_51_202116-01-20211616": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_241_202112-02-20211117": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2513_201919-09-20192468": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_970_202024-07-2020227": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_396_202006-03-2020140": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_408_202101-03-2021780": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2417_201919-09-20192464": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_634_202019-06-2020473": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_858_202008-07-2020331": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1685_202028-10-20201085": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_803_202015-06-2020535": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1397_202025-09-20201666": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_61_202108-02-20211216": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_364_202104-03-2021679": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_12_202014-07-20202392": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_353_202101-03-2021778": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_343_202117-02-20211064": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2915_201931-10-20191504": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1302_202007-10-20201437": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2244_201906-09-20192861": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1933_201902-08-2019837": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1867_201930-07-2019950": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_271_202010-02-2020539": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3169_201921-11-2019941": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_821_202017-06-2020501": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_604_202108-03-2021596": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2350_201906-09-20192870": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1251_202029-10-20201052": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_480_202103-03-2021720": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_920_202021-08-2020769": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1902_201908-08-2019664": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3235_201929-11-2019705": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2853_201914-11-20191174": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1306_202026-08-202018": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_286_202109-02-20211200": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2502_201921-10-20191724": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_791_202126-03-2021188": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1751_202003-12-2020273": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_335_202007-03-2020110": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3074_201920-11-2019975": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_45_202113-01-20211678": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_941_202004-07-2020369": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_513_202106-03-2021627": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2333_201926-09-20192265": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7_202026-06-20202453": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2081_202011-12-2020197": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2643_201925-09-20192304": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1971_201926-08-2019159": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3417_201902-01-20201284": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_88_202020-01-2020967": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2203_201912-09-20192736": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2194_201904-09-20192930": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1729_202027-11-20202234": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_475_202108-03-2021589": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4662_201909-12-20194533": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2242_202006-01-20211781": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1160_202008-09-20203352": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2729_201903-10-20192164": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1073_201907-05-20193099": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1279_202018-09-20201721": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3130_201902-12-2019643": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1410_202028-09-20201643": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4473_201927-11-20194793": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1137_202008-09-20201831": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_679_202106-04-202144": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1497_201928-06-20191855": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_513_202028-02-2020288": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_17_202115-01-20211634": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1057_202023-07-2020246": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_301_202124-02-2021873": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1243_202026-08-202012": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2935_201914-11-20191176": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1643_202020-11-2020440": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1885_202003-11-2020985": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_267_202014-02-2020455": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1183_201907-05-20193105": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_839_202030-06-2020405": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1615_201924-06-20191990": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_61_202001-02-2020722": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2540_201905-10-20192064": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_44_202001-02-2020718": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2141_201903-09-20192973": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_721_202004-06-2020628": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2572_201925-09-20192300": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2096_201913-08-2019573": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1025_202004-08-2020156": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1236_201908-05-20193081": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1738_202021-10-20201163": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_282_202027-02-2020304": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2108_202002-12-2020317": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1853_202023-12-20201929": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3231_201909-12-2019449": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1919_202018-11-2020460": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2084_201921-08-2019303": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_322_202117-02-20211061": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1621_202006-11-20202459": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1719_201901-08-2019860": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_444_202122-02-2021941": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_352_202101-03-2021777": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_903_202016-07-2020289": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1226_202106-04-20211886": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2923_201931-10-20191506": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1280_202021-08-202050": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1409_202014-10-20201272": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2241_201928-08-201979": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2448_201912-09-20192748": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2107_201912-09-20192729": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_77_202010-01-20201126": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_906_202018-08-2020861": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2015_201920-08-2019344": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2751_201914-10-20191915": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_190_202109-02-20211189": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3419_201902-12-2019657": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1507_201910-07-20191512": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1087_202014-10-20201268": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1630_201906-07-20191618": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_340_202118-02-20211025": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_29_202129-01-20211406": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1114_202021-09-20201701": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3609_201921-12-201983": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2320_202005-01-20211804": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_239_202029-01-2020781": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3233_201930-11-2019679": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2272_201904-09-20192938": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_572_202120-03-2021332": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1743_201923-07-20191159": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3017_201916-11-20191094": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1377_201911-06-20192241": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_692_202017-06-2020494": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2480_201924-09-20192326": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1069_202019-08-202060": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1538_202006-10-20201473": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2194_202019-12-202065": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2021_201921-08-2019295": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_360_202117-02-20211065": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_51_202031-01-2020757": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_321_202007-02-2020608": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_516_202018-03-202031": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2039_201922-08-2019248": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_43_202017-02-2020410": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_644_202120-03-2021338": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_820_202015-06-2020536": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1272_202024-08-202043": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1148_201902-05-20193245": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1694_202029-10-20201060": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1793_201901-08-2019864": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_447_202027-02-2020318": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_493_202020-03-202011": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1718_202009-10-20201402": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_143_202119-01-20211574": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2382_201918-09-20192499": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1425_201915-06-20192139": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_889_202003-07-2020375": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_584_202008-07-20201260": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_347_202109-03-2021567": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2521_201918-09-20192504": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_22_202024-07-20202311": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_69_202031-01-2020760": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1958_201914-08-2019521": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2071_202009-12-2020210": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2877_201903-12-2019612": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_122_202007-02-2020602": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2095_202009-12-2020211": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2499_201927-09-20192254": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_412_202102-03-2021752": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_29_202022-01-2020895": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_147_202011-11-20203685": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2006_201906-08-2019749": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2110_201905-09-20192891": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1041_202031-08-20203478": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3227_201906-12-2019522": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_567_202112-03-2021511": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1233_201907-06-20192279": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1312_202012-10-20201343": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2535_201923-09-20192371": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1525_202020-10-20201184": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1325_202009-10-20201385": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1204_202105-04-20211898": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2310_202004-01-20211830": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1690_202020-10-20201188": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_598_202004-06-2020619": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1783_201927-07-2019999": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_874_202017-08-2020893": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3568_201918-12-2019185": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2063_202011-12-2020196": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4699_201911-12-20194457": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2156_201912-09-20192732": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_19_202004-02-2020670": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_888_202019-06-2020478": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_708_202001-06-2020663": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_440_202011-06-2020548": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3297_201922-11-2019901": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1475_202007-10-20201447": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_541_202012-03-202087": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3071_201906-12-2019517": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_797_202001-07-2020398": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_34_202118-01-20211584": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1611_201927-06-20191903": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1268_202017-09-20201740": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2908_201925-10-20191604": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_716_202029-05-2020675": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1649_202013-10-20201332": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1548_202003-10-20201527": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2595_201916-10-20191831": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2859_201924-10-20191640": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_177_202103-02-20211316": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2389_201905-10-20192060": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3327_201902-01-20201283": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_288_202006-02-2020625": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_889_202113-04-202122": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1847_202004-11-2020973": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_136_202118-01-20211593": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_110_202129-01-20211409": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_400_202124-02-2021877": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_555_202005-03-2020181": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1569_202028-10-20202603": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1478_202012-10-20202842": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1277_202021-09-20201707": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3018_201916-11-20191095": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_812_202002-07-2020389": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1586_202001-10-20201568": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1352_202025-09-20201659": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_424_202102-03-2021754": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_231_202112-02-20211116": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2692_201910-10-20191965": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2051_202004-01-20211816": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3428_201902-12-2019659": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1067_202001-09-20201869": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2055_201913-08-2019572": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3409_201920-12-2019102": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1836_202018-11-2020459": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_768_202022-07-2020255": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3259_201902-12-2019648": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_132_202101-02-20211360": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2840_201915-10-20191881": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_779_202017-06-2020497": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_734_202012-06-2020543": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1556_201918-06-20192109": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3211_201917-12-2019202": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_715_202011-06-2020554": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_694_202117-03-2021444": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1861_202009-11-2020917": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1548_201901-07-20191795": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_846_202012-08-2020913": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2652_201909-10-20191991": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1329_202029-09-20201617": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_876_202031-07-2020165": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2149_201903-09-20192974": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3075_201901-11-20191473": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1824_202029-10-20201068": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_258_202001-02-2020726": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1248_202016-09-20203247": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1809_202005-11-2020962": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3286_201902-12-2019650": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_911_202106-04-202156": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_128_202127-01-20211456": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2035_202005-12-2020241": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1066_202028-07-2020220": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_382_202119-02-2021999": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2610_201923-09-20192375": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2705_201905-10-20192070": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1018_202024-07-2020233": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3208_201905-12-2019557": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_926_202004-07-2020364": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2671_201909-10-20191996": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_749_202011-06-2020556": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_833_202020-06-2020467": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2764_201921-10-20191731": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_449_202126-02-2021815": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_617_202101-04-2021137": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_77_202101-02-20211358": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1881_201927-07-20191004": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_680_202122-03-2021295": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_802_202016-06-2020518": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_387_202106-03-2021619": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_60_202018-01-2020996": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4453_201926-11-20194814": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3139_201907-11-20191322": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_373_202014-02-2020464": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1780_202020-10-20201200": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1508_202013-10-20201328": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2095_201927-08-2019109": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2174_202011-12-2020200": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_710_202011-06-2020553": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2446_201912-09-20192747": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_660_202115-03-2021499": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2044_202027-11-2020353": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_616_202012-01-20211710": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2221_202019-12-202071": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1761_201925-07-20191087": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5_202125-01-20211477": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1948_201903-09-20192963": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3020_201924-10-20191660": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2251_202002-01-20211843": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1416_201906-06-20192337": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_435_202005-03-20201462": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2222_202011-12-2020202": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2900_201922-10-20191712": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3440_201910-12-2019428": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1231_202014-09-20201802": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3412_201911-12-2019394": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_639_202117-03-2021438": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3200_201905-12-2019555": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_420_202126-02-2021813": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2238_201904-09-20192934": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3362_201907-12-2019496": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2132_201928-08-201972": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3580_201901-02-2020712": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_158_202128-01-20211431": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_910_202106-04-202155": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_127_202121-01-20211522": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1373_201930-05-20192478": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1499_202030-09-20201598": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2098_201913-08-2019574": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3040_201925-10-20191615": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3363_201907-12-2019497": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1304_202009-10-20201384": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2664_201909-10-20191994": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1461_202029-09-20201624": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1447_201928-06-20191852": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2028_201909-08-2019619": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2839_201915-10-20191880": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_359_202122-02-2021936": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2026_202020-11-2020452": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3493_201903-01-20201247": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_242_202110-02-20211159": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2403_201906-09-20192874": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1370_201914-06-20192160": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_257_202010-02-2020538": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2982_201919-11-20191021": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_392_202028-02-2020282": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_980_202024-08-2020742": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_414_202103-03-2021714": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1311_202001-10-20201551": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_634_202120-03-2021337": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_396_202105-03-2021651": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3047_201914-11-20191182": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_912_202030-07-2020176": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_621_202123-03-2021260": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1710_202020-10-20201191": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2784_201925-10-20191597": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2170_201902-09-20193018": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_361_202004-03-2020207": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2070_202005-12-2020243": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_346_202125-02-2021849": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_268_202126-02-2021808": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_33_202018-08-20202274": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_12_202021-01-2020924": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_565_202103-03-2021730": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_725_202016-06-2020510": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1558_201919-06-20192092": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2638_201926-09-20192277": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2560_201920-09-20192431": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2929_201907-11-20191313": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_814_202105-04-202176": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_139_201903-09-20198160": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1723_202015-10-20201248": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3027_201920-11-2019972": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3329_201922-11-2019905": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3315_201918-12-2019171": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2129_202005-12-2020248": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_733_202003-06-2020640": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1730_202027-11-20202235": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_415_202105-03-2021652": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_463_202123-02-2021915": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_105_202027-02-2020302": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_874_202029-06-2020412": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_291_202005-02-2020646": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2958_201924-10-20191652": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3302_201923-11-2019866": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1960_202013-11-2020481": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_175_202103-02-20211314": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1408_202014-09-20201811": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_245_202109-02-20211196": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1851_202027-10-20201122": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_601_202006-06-2020587": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2011_202024-11-2020404": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_711_201915-05-20192883": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2456_201913-09-20192710": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_965_202022-07-2020266": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1994_202018-11-2020465": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_138_202104-02-20211288": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2327_201931-08-20193070": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1689_201905-07-20191668": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_633_202116-03-2021471": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2627_201925-10-20191591": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1628_201928-06-20191865": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1924_201914-08-2019515": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_668_202020-03-202019": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1203_202014-09-20201799": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_635_202016-07-20201184": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2219_202019-12-202069": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2977_201921-10-20191741": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_622_202006-06-2020589": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1876_202009-12-2020209": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_63_202010-02-2020533": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1159_202008-09-20203351": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_777_202025-06-2020428": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_474_202103-03-2021719": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2625_201905-10-20192067": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1728_202012-10-20201370": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2890_201907-11-20191309": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1152_202016-09-20201757": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_345_202118-02-20211027": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1819_202013-11-2020477": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1536_201920-07-20191209": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1564_202030-09-20201603": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_750_202122-03-2021300": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2153_202016-12-2020125": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3190_201923-11-2019864": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_66_202023-01-2020862": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1563_202029-10-20202576": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2057_202005-12-2020242": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_77_202001-10-20203755": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1174_202008-09-20203362": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3096_201915-11-20191141": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1715_202015-10-20201246": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_300_202026-02-2020334": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_445_202013-03-20201391": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2413_201916-09-20192604": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2354_201921-09-20192395": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1805_201925-07-20191096": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2016_201920-08-2019345": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_539_202006-03-2020152": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_305_202027-02-2020305": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_351_202008-06-20201924": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2033_201921-08-2019296": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_614_202125-03-2021213": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_806_201921-05-20192695": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_938_202028-07-2020212": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1477_202006-10-20201470": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_597_202007-07-2020336": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_568_202123-03-2021258": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2120_202005-12-2020245": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1460_202019-10-20201213": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_973_202015-07-2020304": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1903_202010-11-2020520": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2158_202005-12-2020253": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_362_202119-02-2021994": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_171_202021-01-2020931": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_365_202119-02-2021995": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2843_201921-10-20191736": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_628_202120-03-2021334": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_103_202020-01-2020968": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1130_202007-09-20203387": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1599_202023-10-20201133": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2538_201926-09-20192273": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1125_202017-09-20201737": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_433_202106-03-2021620": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1482_202012-10-20201346": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2264_202006-01-20211784": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_742_202103-04-202197": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1554_202030-09-20201602": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3618_201908-01-20201176": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_410_202005-03-2020169": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1822_201918-07-20191279": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3106_201907-11-20191320": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2408_201904-10-20192103": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1958_202007-11-2020935": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4711_201912-12-20194423": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2107_202002-12-2020316": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1663_202005-11-2020957": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1825_202006-11-2020945": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_425_202108-03-2021588": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2836_201919-10-20191759": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_974_202003-07-2020383": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2565_201901-10-20192187": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1617_202005-10-20201500": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_915_202014-07-2020317": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2761_201905-10-20192075": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_761_202030-07-2020993": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2083_202017-12-2020106": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3414_201918-12-2019175": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_293_202117-02-20211057": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2262_201903-09-20192983": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2241_202006-01-20211780": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_195_202130-01-2021834": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2081_202011-12-2020173": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_397_202104-03-2021450": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1480_202025-09-2020873": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_361_202022-05-2020769": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_860_202003-07-2020463": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1200297_201922-06-2019708": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_193_202012-02-2020373": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1600248_201919-09-2019853": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1763_202029-10-2020567": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1600114_201921-08-201985": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1116_202010-08-2020129": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_230_202102-02-2021799": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1702_202022-10-2020619": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_756_202020-06-2020547": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_49_202013-01-2020792": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_890_202010-07-2020399": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000113_201913-11-2019488": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1600241_201919-09-2019852": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1600047_201906-08-2019264": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_224_202130-01-20211582": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1652_202021-10-2020630": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_189_202029-01-2020591": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_631_202006-06-2020693": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_413_202014-05-2020839": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1980_202010-12-2020186": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1412_202016-09-2020935": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000275_201910-12-2019195": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_159_202029-01-2020587": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_893_202009-07-2020420": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_223_202004-03-2020156": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_402_202015-05-2020826": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_70_202011-02-2020397": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1421_202022-09-2020904": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_605_202006-06-2020688": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_869_202009-07-2020418": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_167_202129-01-2021855": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_187_202001-02-2020521": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_934_202010-07-2020400": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1600183_201929-08-201910": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1294_202003-09-20201041": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_7976_202028-10-20201221": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000096_201907-11-2019513": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_6_202107-01-20211101": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_50_202012-02-2020378": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_906_202020-08-202031": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_134_202130-01-2021823": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3000036_201915-10-2019685": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1420_202022-09-2020903": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_69_202011-02-2020396": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1600068_201905-08-2019280": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_104_202020-01-2020708": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_469_202110-03-2021398": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2042_202007-12-2020230": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_676_202015-06-2020632": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_807_202026-06-2020503": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1200432_201930-07-2019354": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_764_202008-07-2020428": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_734_202023-06-2020523": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1786_202028-10-2020589": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_76_202007-02-2020453": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_547_202124-03-2021254": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_348_202030-01-2021837": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1445_202001-10-2020828": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_470_202110-03-2021399": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_803_202008-07-2020432": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_57_202115-01-20211031": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1212_202024-08-202018": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1837_202004-11-2020497": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_313_202111-02-2021702": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1493_202003-10-2020820": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1906_202013-11-2020402": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000137_201913-11-2019493": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_619_202008-06-2020682": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_514_202002-06-2020715": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1200350_201909-07-2019579": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_412_202014-05-2020838": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_558_202105-04-202191": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_512_202027-05-2020762": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1803_202005-11-2020472": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1955_202003-12-2020268": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_360_202017-03-202065": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1850_202002-11-2020525": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1053_202023-07-2020263": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_125_202023-01-2020646": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2111_202019-12-202043": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_118_202122-01-2021939": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_459_202021-05-2020788": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1009_202020-07-2020295": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_251_202106-02-2021777": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1217_202010-08-2020134": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1677_202020-10-2020658": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_431_202103-03-2021471": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_174_202028-01-2020618": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_449_202020-03-202021": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_959_202014-07-2020368": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_198_202106-02-2021761": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1231_202014-09-2020945": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1076_202012-08-2020113": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_693_202122-04-202112": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_416_202126-02-20211425": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1404_202030-09-2020838": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000109_201906-11-2019525": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000041_201915-10-2019686": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1011_202020-07-2020296": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_175_202019-02-2020297": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_349_202002-02-2021800": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_348_202123-02-2021608": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1136_202007-08-2020150": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_449_202110-03-2021394": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1309_202020-08-202052": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_53_202010-01-2020811": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_127_202128-01-2021869": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_208_202108-02-2021735": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1506_202029-09-2020862": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_119_202128-01-2021865": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1826_202019-11-2020361": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_497_202022-05-2020777": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_401_202002-02-2021801": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2160_202007-01-20211108": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_839_202002-07-2020474": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_876_202017-08-2020891": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1328_202002-09-20201066": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_132_202116-01-20211609": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2023_202011-12-2020171": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1110_202014-08-202092": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_762_202002-07-2020468": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000073_201931-10-2019557": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1148_202020-08-202036": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_116_202119-01-2021975": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_709_202015-06-2020634": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_310_202111-02-20211525": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_320_202116-02-2021669": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000132_201916-11-2019441": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_480_202028-05-2020749": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_160060_201925-09-2019793": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_900_202007-07-2020448": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_75_202018-01-2020737": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000266_201913-12-2019153": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1600109_201908-08-2019228": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_374_202122-02-20211486": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_245_202006-03-2020107": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1178_202013-08-2020107": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_159_202019-02-2020292": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1482_202025-09-2020875": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2034_202010-12-2020195": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_705_202017-06-2020599": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_85_202017-01-2020757": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_160_202019-02-2020293": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_419_202018-05-2020808": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_509_202118-03-2021327": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_187_202020-02-2020276": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_310_202018-03-202039": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1752_202028-10-2020585": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_842_202120-04-20211175": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_957_202017-07-2020305": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_816_202013-07-2020381": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000131_201913-11-2019491": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_442_202019-05-2020801": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1070_202004-08-2020208": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2039_202007-12-2020229": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_602_202006-06-2020687": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2123_202022-12-202021": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_212_202106-02-2021763": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_434_202102-03-2021485": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1200440_201919-07-2019453": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1516_202022-10-2020610": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2201_202017-12-202095": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1084_202004-08-2020210": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_241_202029-02-2020213": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_102_202112-01-20211617": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_839_202120-04-20211172": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_105_202011-02-2020407": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_668_202016-06-2020610": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_989_202024-07-2020234": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1704_202022-10-2020620": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_946_202009-07-2020422": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_615_202101-04-2021143": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3_202006-02-2020469": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_198_202020-02-2020282": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1200437_201918-07-2019470": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1600240_201919-09-2019851": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1675_202019-10-2020673": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2095_202015-12-2020110": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1719_202022-10-2020622": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1549_202008-10-2020780": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1244_202020-08-202048": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_891_202013-07-2020387": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1910_202019-11-2020373": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_115_202015-02-2020340": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1200403_201916-07-2019490": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1975_202003-12-2020271": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_898_202009-07-2020421": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2086_202017-12-202090": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1631_202015-10-2020718": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2182_202008-01-20211094": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_858_202005-08-2020172": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_385_202020-03-202019": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_170_202020-02-2020271": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1766_202030-10-2020551": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_300063_201915-10-2019683": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1200333_201901-07-2019661": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1981_202007-12-2020221": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000039_201911-10-2019703": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_591_202131-03-2021155": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1504_202017-10-2020683": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1007_202015-07-2020352": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7909_202015-10-20201309": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_939_202007-07-2020450": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_381_202001-02-2021814": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_74_202010-01-2020816": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_329_202007-03-202088": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_476_202110-03-2021400": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_74_202115-01-20211033": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_17_202107-01-20211102": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101_202119-01-2021973": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_616_202011-06-2020650": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_537_202118-03-2021333": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_578_202118-03-20211308": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_388_202011-05-2020849": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1256_202014-09-2020946": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1200410_201916-07-2019491": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1834_202004-11-2020495": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1200453_201931-07-2019329": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_64_202112-01-20211056": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2208_202012-10-2020766": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1357_202022-09-2020896": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1200127_201902-05-20191046": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1484_202003-10-2020818": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_153_202029-01-2020582": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_678_202126-03-20211203": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_603_202005-06-2020699": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_200102_201906-01-2020868": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_19_202108-01-20211085": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1758_202031-10-2020533": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_998_202016-07-2020331": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1245_202017-08-202083": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_494_202109-03-20211351": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_271_202024-02-2020264": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_881_202014-07-2020359": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1600146_201927-08-201935": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1500_202029-09-2020861": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1491_202029-09-2020858": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3000195_201925-11-2019366": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1966_202005-12-2020235": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1639_202017-10-2020689": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_26_202014-01-2020774": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7656_202014-09-20201547": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1264_202024-08-202025": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1600030_201905-08-2019276": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1125_202012-08-2020116": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3000209_201905-12-2019263": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_8_202112-01-20211045": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_273_202010-12-20201106": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5_202101-01-20211660": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_834_202120-04-20211169": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_305_202123-02-2021600": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_276_202025-02-2020254": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_902_202018-06-2020585": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_222_202004-03-2020155": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000081_201907-11-2019512": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_25_202004-02-2020495": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_357_202017-03-202062": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1600166_201906-09-20191004": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_720_202022-06-2020536": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_684_202127-04-202111": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_496_202109-03-20211353": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_248_202005-03-2020132": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_377_202126-02-2021537": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_17_202102-01-20211656": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_51_202013-01-2020793": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_185_202020-02-2020275": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_572_202118-03-20211298": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1200379_201909-07-2019582": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1200461_201924-07-2019409": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_989_202002-09-20201618": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_717_202019-06-2020563": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1032_202006-08-2020158": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_358_202017-03-202063": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1600292_201930-09-2019763": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_256_202006-03-2020113": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_89_202017-01-2020758": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2048_202014-12-2020135": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_354_202122-02-2021633": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2029_202014-12-2020130": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_405_202104-03-2021453": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1054_202023-07-2020264": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1617_202015-10-2020717": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3000037_201922-10-2019631": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2028_202014-12-2020129": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_132_202125-01-2021905": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1584_202016-10-2020700": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1556_202005-10-2020807": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_331_202116-02-2021674": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1521_202030-09-2020844": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_281_202019-02-2020302": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1765_202031-10-2020534": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_73_202014-01-2020777": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1848_202005-11-2020481": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101_202014-01-2020786": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1747_202031-10-2020532": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3000062_201923-10-2019611": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_27_202004-02-2020497": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_415_202015-05-2020828": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_121_202023-01-2020644": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1600232_201913-09-2019947": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_944_202013-07-2020390": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_200121_201902-01-2020898": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1037_202023-07-2020261": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_155_202128-01-2021875": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1253_202004-09-20201016": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_510_202112-03-2021376": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2206_202012-10-2020765": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_613_202101-04-2021141": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_47_202012-02-2020377": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1788_202005-11-2020468": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_160121_201903-09-20191046": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_880_202009-07-2020419": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1200275_201914-06-2019716": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_284_202116-02-2021665": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2021_202005-12-2020243": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1644_202021-10-2020629": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1600_202020-10-2020647": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1214_202007-08-2020152": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1681_202021-10-2020633": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_685_202020-06-2020546": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1879_202026-11-2020297": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_477_202022-05-2020774": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_875_202017-08-2020890": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1131_202018-08-202054": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_7974_202022-02-20211488": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_270_202029-02-2020215": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_200120_201908-01-2020830": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_38_202003-02-2020515": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_380_202001-02-2021813": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3000269_201909-12-2019218": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1177_202013-08-2020106": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1954_202026-11-2020303": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_608_202006-06-2020690": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_76_202115-01-20212891": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4194_202020-10-20201113": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4949_202004-01-20213221": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4202_202021-10-20201072": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_437_202129-01-20213625": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4608_202010-11-2020751": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1401_202023-07-2020747": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4425_201913-12-2019315": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5000266_201905-09-20193178": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4527_202001-12-2020399": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2711_202023-07-2020763": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_555_202101-02-20213614": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4758_202006-01-20213145": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1398_202102-04-2021346": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1050_202123-03-2021561": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2354_202007-07-20201384": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1659_202120-04-202193": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4774_202001-12-20202486": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4677_202019-11-2020625": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3477_202009-09-20202064": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3108_202018-08-2020197": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4228_201905-12-2019587": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1162_202006-03-2020204": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3086_202019-08-2020146": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1569_202009-06-20201940": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6_202107-01-20213113": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1735_202012-06-20201845": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_806_202124-02-20211514": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_178_202119-01-20212791": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2613_201921-08-2019255": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4831_202016-12-20202417": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4297_201930-11-2019733": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_709_202005-02-20201108": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2585_202006-11-20202545": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_185_202108-01-20213756": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5000132_201908-05-20192928": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4271_201911-12-2019396": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4278_201910-12-2019458": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4050_201918-12-2019160": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1608_202005-06-20202053": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1424_202105-04-2021308": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1269_202124-03-2021527": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1607_201928-05-20192425": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3233_202025-08-202062": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2182_202005-10-20202658": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5016_202024-12-202012": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4046_202012-10-20201319": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_736_202018-02-2020687": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2111_202017-06-20201753": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_787_202101-02-20213616": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1703_202015-06-20201792": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3015_202018-08-2020181": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_49_202125-01-20212601": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_759_202005-02-20201113": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2598_201902-09-20193275": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_103_202112-01-20213008": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1485_202108-04-2021242": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_416_202018-02-20202200": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1809_202016-06-20201766": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4859_202015-12-2020173": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1375_202012-03-2020131": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5107_202005-01-20213191": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1476_202028-05-20202214": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3120_201919-09-20192706": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1402_202101-04-2021368": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_200_202030-01-20202332": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4095_202015-10-20201215": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4433_202028-10-2020989": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_914_202126-02-20211425": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_69_202021-01-20201520": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1259_202012-03-2020121": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3253_201926-09-20192406": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4976_202017-12-2020135": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_618_202006-03-20202124": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_297_202027-01-20201383": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1749_202016-06-20201764": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3290_202027-08-20202368": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1696_201920-06-20192048": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5181_202011-01-20213064": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3132_201923-09-20192592": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3499_201910-10-20192045": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3505_202010-09-20202035": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_649_202110-02-20212021": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_988_202025-02-2020540": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_259_202115-01-20213696": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_838_202122-02-20211630": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2549_201909-08-2019592": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1153_202007-03-2020175": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_946_202026-02-2020481": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1369_202013-03-2020100": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_364_202024-01-20201426": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1565_202004-06-20202072": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_260_202022-01-20201490": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2147_202015-06-20201828": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1715_201928-05-20192428": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5156_202016-01-20212866": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1506_201924-05-20192515": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4967_202022-12-202051": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_424_201908-05-20192906": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3714_202015-09-20201962": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_530_202109-02-20212071": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_613_202105-02-20213575": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4806_202003-12-2020369": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3429_202007-09-20202130": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3195_202014-08-2020259": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4609_202010-11-2020752": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_850_202026-02-2020474": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3154_202019-08-2020154": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4669_202021-11-2020548": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_388_202102-02-20212361": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_842_202109-03-20211015": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1345_201902-05-20193114": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3739_202029-09-20201569": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1716_202020-08-20202290": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3510_201910-10-20192047": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2842_202029-07-2020560": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4999_202017-12-2020141": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1614_202003-06-20202112": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3890_202028-09-20201629": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2949_201930-09-20192299": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_480_202108-02-20212111": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1583_202113-04-2021177": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2678_202013-07-20201239": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5064_202024-12-202015": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_586_202125-02-20211444": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_941_202116-03-2021826": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2436_202015-07-20201104": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3810_202029-09-20201572": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_370_202120-01-20213650": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2183_202029-06-20201504": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_375_202108-02-20212106": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_545_202006-02-20201047": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2331_202015-07-20201098": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4698_202004-12-20202468": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3044_202018-08-2020184": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_446_202007-02-20201009": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_829_202019-02-2020643": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3839_202005-10-20201496": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_982_202017-02-2020758": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2194_202009-07-20201281": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4633_201902-01-20202095": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_122_202120-01-20212732": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_599_202109-04-202163": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2962_201919-09-20192691": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_202_202017-01-20201652": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3822_202015-10-20201212": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4000275_201902-11-20191495": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_889_202013-03-202086": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1553_202120-04-202186": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3040_201924-09-20192517": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_111_202104-01-20213799": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1306_202027-05-20202230": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5000207_201902-07-20191889": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1540_202107-04-2021267": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2806_201928-08-201968": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_515_202027-02-20202154": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_536_202005-02-20201094": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5175_202004-01-20213241": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1887_202007-07-20201370": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1267_202124-03-2021526": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_808_202018-02-2020691": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_801_202027-05-20202398": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4732_202007-12-20202459": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_360_202122-01-20213632": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2600_201914-08-2019477": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4731_202007-12-20202458": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4432_202005-11-2020816": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_573_202106-04-202177": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2793_202027-07-2020656": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3645_202017-09-20201860": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1690_202019-08-20202297": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5085_202021-12-2020107": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_854_202003-03-2020304": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4507_202005-11-2020826": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4805_202014-12-20202434": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_544_202006-02-20201046": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_573_202007-02-20201014": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4590_202011-11-2020717": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1923_202006-06-20202032": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3250_202025-08-202064": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_790_202118-02-20211764": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_268_202125-01-20212618": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1987_202018-09-20202707": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2306_201922-07-20191246": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_735_202013-02-2020815": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2820_202028-07-2020610": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_848_202125-02-20211457": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1308_202126-03-2021441": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_467_202024-02-20202184": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3065_201923-09-20192588": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5077_202021-12-2020104": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_355_202129-01-20212487": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3768_202028-09-20201606": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2543_202017-07-2020999": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1651_202017-08-20202312": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_966_202024-02-2020588": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_915_202025-02-2020521": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_35_202009-01-20201824": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2255_201916-07-20191453": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2415_202009-07-20201294": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_188_202127-01-20212542": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4781_202007-12-20202463": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_119_202115-01-20212897": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_368_202120-01-20213649": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3017_202005-08-2020385": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3707_202028-09-20201604": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3654_202022-09-20201730": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3205_202019-08-2020162": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1095_202117-03-2021765": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3906_202013-10-20201267": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4149_201927-11-2019853": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4498_201918-12-2019173": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3558_202014-09-20201985": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3548_202021-10-20201071": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5000199_201925-06-20192016": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_267_202125-01-20212617": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2642_202017-07-20201018": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1598_202005-06-20202050": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4458_202019-11-2020596": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_278_202017-01-20201665": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1223_202119-03-2021689": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_950_202117-03-2021761": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_668_202005-02-20201104": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4105_201926-11-2019906": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2005_202021-09-20202697": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1302_201906-05-20192986": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3902_202029-09-20201585": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4510_202011-11-20202516": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2752_201927-08-2019103": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1711_202010-06-20201917": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2515_202013-07-20201236": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3153_201918-09-20192770": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_259_202119-01-20212798": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1724_202015-06-20201798": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_202_202119-01-20212794": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_205_202023-01-20201450": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_296_202120-01-20212755": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4390_202002-11-2020885": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_473_202101-02-20213608": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_981_202020-06-20201675": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4909_202010-12-2020251": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_542_202003-02-20201174": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4561_202011-11-2020712": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4115_202014-10-20201251": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2489_202016-07-20201041": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2898_201906-09-20193111": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4568_202018-11-2020663": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_826_202125-02-20211451": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2036_202006-07-20201410": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1415_201931-05-20192282": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4254_202029-10-2020955": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2770_201927-08-2019110": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4383_202027-10-20201016": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4263_202023-10-20201036": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1417_202131-03-2021395": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1722_201901-07-20191904": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4105_202014-10-20201249": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3191_201924-09-20192520": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3302_202027-08-20202374": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_99_202009-01-20201838": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3823_202029-09-20201573": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2207_202008-07-20201322": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2256_202001-07-20201455": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2580_202006-11-20202543": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1355_202018-03-202017": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2633_201909-08-2019603": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3100_202001-09-20202303": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_336_202029-01-20201308": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4821_202004-12-2020327": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4907_202019-12-2020116": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_290_202122-01-20212670": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1409_201906-05-20192997": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1913_202008-09-20202756": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3431_202008-09-20202087": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1456_202131-03-2021396": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_284_202118-01-20212831": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4370_201907-01-20201924": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1408_202018-03-202027": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_287_202016-01-20201687": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2215_202023-06-20201632": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_705_202004-02-20201145": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1591_202005-06-20202046": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3312_202026-08-202041": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3298_202027-08-20202373": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_993_202115-03-2021875": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_375_202020-01-20201605": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4772_202001-12-2020409": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4439_201913-12-2019317": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3399_202004-09-20202204": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_250_202115-01-20213688": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3096_201918-09-20192767": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3640_202017-09-20201857": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1038_202116-03-2021835": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1138_202028-02-2020407": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1590_202005-06-20202045": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_886_202102-03-20211351": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4484_202030-10-2020940": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4858_202007-12-2020300": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_17_202114-01-20212932": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3764_202018-09-20201838": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_153_202121-01-20212696": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4682_202021-11-2020552": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4804_202003-12-2020368": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_186_202017-01-20201647": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_115_202017-01-20202480": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2634_202020-07-2020950": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3932_202028-09-20201633": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_644_202106-02-20212170": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3075_201924-09-20192518": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1570_202120-04-202188": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1399_202102-04-2021347": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1947_202023-06-20201606": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4805_202002-12-2020393": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3016_202005-08-2020384": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3406_202016-09-20201876": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4000250_201914-10-20191993": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1007_202116-03-2021833": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_254_202022-01-20201486": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2167_202023-06-20201626": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3776_201923-10-20191640": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4165_201928-11-2019797": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_469_202102-02-20213600": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4981_202024-12-20209": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2581_201909-08-2019600": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4165_202008-10-20201398": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3488_202024-09-20201664": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3956_201908-11-20191352": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1943_202010-09-20202744": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4847_202006-01-20213146": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4960_202016-12-2020159": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4578_201919-12-2019138": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5120_202012-01-20213014": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_77_202122-01-20212657": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1511_202109-04-2021211": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3711_202003-10-20201533": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2364_202007-07-20201387": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4365_202029-10-2020968": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1199_202122-03-2021609": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1485_201922-05-20192553": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1200_202007-03-2020178": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4829_202009-12-2020262": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_334_202101-02-20212408": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3540_201925-10-20191559": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4930_202016-12-2020155": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1379_202013-03-2020101": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3362_202003-09-20202246": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3759_201918-10-20191768": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2798_202027-07-2020659": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1149_202117-03-2021781": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_617_202111-02-20211967": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1186_202118-03-2021737": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4417_201912-12-2019367": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3614_202016-09-20201895": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_643_202106-02-20212169": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2649_202020-07-2020954": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4293_202029-10-2020957": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_98_202013-01-20201754": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4569_201919-12-2019137": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_166_202008-01-20201882": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_116_202017-01-20202481": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1474_202026-05-20202270": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4809_202014-12-20202437": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4000261_201922-10-20191706": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3851_201901-11-20191508": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5000159_201930-05-20192343": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1496_202030-05-20202165": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_601_202010-02-2020912": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2145_201908-07-20191764": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4415_202005-11-2020811": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5036_202023-12-202032": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_990_202025-02-2020541": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_206_202112-01-20213721": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_362_202122-01-20213634": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5142_202012-01-20213016": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3595_202014-09-20201993": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1557_202106-04-2021294": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4734_202026-11-2020448": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3717_202015-09-20201963": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1723_202015-06-20201797": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4571_201902-01-20202084": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_756_202120-02-20211672": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4865_202010-12-2020248": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2011_202009-06-20201974": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5000325_201926-11-2019925": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_260_202119-01-20212799": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1974_202022-06-20201642": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2052_202013-07-20201193": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1343_202018-03-202011": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4594_202023-11-2020514": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_754_202126-02-20211415": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2998_201916-09-20192846": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3814_201918-11-20191124": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_254_202122-01-20212665": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5119_202007-01-20213116": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1592_201929-05-20192371": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3602_202015-09-20201955": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3455_201923-10-20191624": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1266_202122-03-2021622": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2350_201902-08-2019893": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4748_202027-11-2020429": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_406_202024-01-20201428": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1571_202127-04-202132": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3673_202018-09-20201827": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2278_202026-06-20201540": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4541_202011-11-2020702": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_475_202101-02-20213610": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_181_202027-01-20201379": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_329_202028-01-20201348": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2075_202025-06-20201561": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2180_202026-06-20201532": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_104_202114-01-20212938": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2315_202014-07-20201151": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2779_201904-09-20193208": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1627_201907-06-20192152": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_106_202108-01-20213094": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_372_202103-03-2021162": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4842_202017-12-20202406": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_488_202004-02-20201126": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3962_201919-11-20191078": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4951_202021-12-202090": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1277_202005-03-2020257": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1259_202108-04-2021237": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5110_202012-01-20213013": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1838_201910-07-20191655": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_583_202007-02-20201016": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2639_202016-07-20201070": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_509_202028-01-20201368": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1929_202016-06-20201774": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5000133_201908-05-20192929": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_377_202108-02-20212108": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2376_201924-07-20191161": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2102_202025-06-20201563": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4892_202009-12-2020269": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1007_202006-03-2020196": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3080_202013-08-2020271": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_153_202108-01-20213753": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_718_202117-02-20211802": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1295_202127-04-202127": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1068_202006-03-2020198": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2947_201902-09-20193297": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3666_202022-09-20201733": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4495_201903-01-20202035": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2233_201916-09-20192833": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3694_202021-09-20201778": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4000336_201911-12-2019433": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3500_201909-10-20192100": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1063_202115-03-2021880": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2695_202023-07-2020757": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1188_202124-03-2021523": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1186_202003-03-2020322": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_779_202122-02-20211625": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4065_201928-11-2019789": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4566_201902-01-20202083": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_925_202030-05-20202390": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1263_202119-03-2021693": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2259_202025-06-20201570": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_922_202126-02-20211426": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5122_202004-01-20213237": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1116_202106-03-20211151": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1292_202006-07-20202342": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2894_201902-09-20193290": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5031_202008-01-20213097": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4456_202002-11-2020890": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3106_202018-08-2020195": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1157_202112-03-2021941": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_463_202105-02-20212203": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_63_202116-03-2021819": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3687_202015-10-20201211": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1388_202027-05-20202236": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_546_202111-02-20211962": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4868_202024-12-20205": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3738_202022-09-20201740": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3990_202008-10-20201381": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_994_202108-03-20211075": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1089_202123-03-2021562": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4638_202018-11-2020671": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3186_202020-08-2020126": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1200_202125-03-2021473": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4313_202023-10-20201041": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3779_202028-09-20201611": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2289_201919-07-20191315": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3335_202027-08-20202377": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3682_202018-09-20201828": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1942_202010-09-20202743": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4162_202017-10-20201177": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2462_202009-07-20201299": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4904_202002-12-20202483": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4362_202029-10-2020966": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4477_202018-11-2020649": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1016_202006-06-20202380": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1530_202001-06-20202148": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1022_202008-06-20202371": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4091_201928-11-2019791": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3079_202013-08-2020270": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3221_202021-08-202097": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4530_201903-01-20202037": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_374_202108-02-20212105": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4909_202017-12-20202412": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_682_202115-02-20211887": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_826_202019-02-2020642": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1924_201927-06-20191961": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4607_202010-11-2020750": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_494_202025-02-20202173": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4803_202014-12-20202432": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_881_202122-02-20211633": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4891_202009-12-2020268": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_46_202113-01-20212958": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3657_202022-09-20201731": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1707_202020-08-20202288": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3878_202006-10-20201462": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_547_202101-04-202192": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_594_202109-02-20212079": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1840_202015-06-20201809": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_669_202108-02-20212126": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3846_202029-09-20201578": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1442_202101-04-2021373": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3501_202012-10-20201302": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2871_202030-07-2020513": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1659_202010-06-20201906": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5049_202023-12-202034": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4100_202012-10-20201330": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_724_202012-02-2020855": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_747_202018-02-2020688": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1432_202027-05-20202243": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1638_202014-08-20202319": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2251_202015-07-20201087": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_275_202024-01-20201410": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5000251_201929-08-201942": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_337_202029-01-20201309": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2518_202007-07-20201399": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5000129_201915-05-20192756": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_746_202122-02-20211617": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_580_202005-02-20201098": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4388_202028-10-2020985": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5000341_201904-12-2019640": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4585_202011-11-2020715": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4461_201911-12-2019431": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_13_202106-01-20213133": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1809_202001-09-20202785": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1679_202009-06-20201956": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1796_202017-06-20201740": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3450_202021-09-20201770": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2992_202031-07-2020473": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_30_202113-01-20212953": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1824_201926-06-20191974": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3149_202013-08-2020280": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1836_202012-06-20201855": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3145_202017-08-2020227": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4832_202016-12-20202418": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3612_201923-10-20191626": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3370_202004-09-20202196": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3562_202014-09-20201987": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2451_201909-08-2019587": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1763_201907-06-20192162": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4217_202003-11-2020854": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4368_202023-10-20201049": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4213_202023-10-20201029": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2905_201906-09-20193112": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4987_202022-12-202052": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1986_202016-06-20201779": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1195_202119-03-2021683": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_323_202117-02-20211784": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3563_201922-10-20191676": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1301_202125-03-2021480": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5000255_201903-09-20193266": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3411_202008-09-20202083": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_585_202013-02-2020811": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_50_202015-01-20201699": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_632_202117-02-20211789": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_794_202007-02-20201029": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_261_202115-01-20213698": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3532_202025-09-20201643": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2558_202014-07-20201163": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4284_201918-12-2019163": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1230_202122-03-2021615": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_125_202108-01-20213742": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4906_202021-12-20202396": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_807_202116-03-2021824": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1021_202008-06-20202370": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1844_202002-09-20202774": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2825_202028-07-2020614": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2652_202016-07-20201073": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1325_202102-04-2021341": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3848_202024-09-20201686": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1344_202018-03-202012": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2698_201920-08-2019337": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4219_201929-11-2019759": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2168_202005-10-20202655": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4262_202028-10-2020980": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_42_202102-01-20213809": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1149_202017-03-202046": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5000238_201907-08-2019716": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3475_202010-09-20202030": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2222_202018-06-20201722": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4666_201907-01-20201930": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5000313_201913-11-20191306": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1364_202002-06-20202127": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4573_202023-11-20202506": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2229_202026-06-20201538": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5096_202019-01-20212805": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2098_202024-09-20202684": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3661_202022-09-20201732": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2353_201928-08-201955": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3188_201913-09-20192959": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_857_202109-03-20211021": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3771_202017-09-20201869": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1163_202003-03-2020319": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_87_202113-01-20212962": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3423_202016-09-20201879": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4181_202020-10-20201111": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4735_202007-12-20202462": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2042_202022-06-20201651": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_335_202028-01-20201350": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3468_202008-09-20202097": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3575_201917-10-20191822": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1011_202105-03-20211219": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_848_202018-02-2020700": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_265_202120-01-20212754": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3581_202018-09-20201819": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1492_202017-03-202064": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_552_202105-02-20213569": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5078_202021-12-2020105": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1951_202009-06-20201970": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3442_202008-09-20202090": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4552_202018-11-2020662": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_434_202103-02-20212323": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4000268_201924-10-20191603": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3619_202017-09-20201850": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_244_202021-01-20201530": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_451_202031-01-20201231": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4723_202024-11-2020497": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2294_202014-07-20201146": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3213_202026-08-202022": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5022_202022-12-202059": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_802_202027-05-20202399": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_607_202004-03-20202136": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5000343_201904-12-2019642": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5056_202022-12-202065": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4671_202021-11-2020550": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4385_201911-12-2019413": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_975_202105-03-20211209": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_78_202010-01-20201787": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3503_202011-09-20202006": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2968_201904-09-20193216": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_204_202116-01-20212863": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5000308_201917-10-20191842": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2899_202028-07-2020632": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1291_202006-07-20202341": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2481_202013-07-20201231": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3946_202005-10-20201510": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_415_202030-01-20201286": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_627_202110-02-20212018": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4159_202019-10-20201144": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1579_202005-06-20202044": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_706_202126-02-20211412": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_321_202101-02-20212405": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4990_202021-12-202091": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_893_202103-03-20211278": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_597_202116-02-20211821": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4240_202027-10-20201003": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2099_202018-06-20201717": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1584_202113-04-2021178": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1160_202118-03-2021728": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1056_202118-03-2021722": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4582_201909-01-20201847": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2370_202008-07-20201326": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_995_202018-02-2020715": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_324_202115-01-20213702": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_349_202115-02-20211869": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2780_201918-09-20192743": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1690_202009-06-20201959": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_368_202029-01-20201319": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3464_202017-09-20201848": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_699_202004-02-20201143": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4115_201927-11-2019845": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3924_202006-10-20201463": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_342_202109-02-20212061": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1412_202027-05-20202241": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4728_202027-11-2020424": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2087_201917-07-20191397": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2955_202005-08-2020379": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_574_202105-03-20211192": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_773_202026-02-2020471": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4085_201928-11-2019790": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1925_201905-07-20191801": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1596_201929-05-20192372": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_454_202030-01-20201294": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2929_201919-09-20192690": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1321_202028-05-20202201": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2_202002-01-20202661": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2571_202022-07-2020811": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1887_201918-07-20191344": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3580_202008-09-20202101": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1637_201931-05-20192289": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_277_202127-01-20212547": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5095_202011-02-20211978": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2292_202024-06-20201598": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_307_202125-01-20212623": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4880_202009-12-2020266": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4296_202019-10-20201158": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2763_201906-09-20193106": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3678_202009-10-20201346": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3445_202007-09-20202137": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4465_202018-11-2020645": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3675_202009-10-20201344": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4348_201903-12-2019657": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2567_202005-11-20202556": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4158_202016-10-20201195": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2010_201904-07-20191830": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1781_201924-06-20192021": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3005_202007-08-2020317": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_491_202025-02-20202170": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3476_202010-09-20202031": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_367_202029-01-20201318": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2729_202023-07-2020768": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_979_202109-03-20211027": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4253_202016-10-20201206": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4863_202004-12-2020334": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2465_202009-07-20201300": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_117_202106-01-20213765": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_525_202110-02-20212007": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3292_202027-08-20202369": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1735_201911-06-20192125": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3101_202018-08-2020194": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1658_202010-06-20201905": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_780_202119-02-20211734": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1196_202027-02-2020457": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_384_202130-01-20212442": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4672_202023-11-2020519": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1344_202125-03-2021487": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1083_202003-03-2020316": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2417_202007-07-20201392": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_664_202115-02-20211885": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1992_201908-07-20191756": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3749_202018-09-20201836": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_71_202114-01-20212934": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2766_202027-07-2020650": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1911_202008-09-20202754": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_991_202028-02-2020382": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1067_202011-03-2020138": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1396_202131-03-2021392": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3930_202007-10-20201415": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4135_202015-10-20201221": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_290_202119-01-20213661": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2324_202006-07-20201419": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_537_202131-03-202196": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_715_202011-02-2020894": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4947_202015-12-2020184": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_597_202006-02-20201059": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3126_202018-08-2020201": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1403_202101-04-2021369": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1329_202126-03-2021450": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5000195_201925-06-20192014": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_74_202010-01-20202557": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2704_201919-08-2019420": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_493_202004-02-20201128": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_706_202004-02-20201146": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_102_202101-01-20213823": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2672_202021-07-2020886": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2814_202028-07-2020608": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1896_202013-07-20201189": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2778_202027-07-2020653": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3610_202016-09-20201893": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4233_202023-10-20201031": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1517_202001-06-20202143": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4735_202027-11-2020427": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3689_202014-09-20201998": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2862_202030-07-2020509": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_92_202112-01-20213007": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_583_202106-02-20213559": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_780_202014-02-2020788": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1634_202120-04-202190": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_491_202109-02-20212067": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3943_202029-09-20201591": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3443_202008-09-20202091": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3458_202016-09-20201883": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4500_201918-12-2019174": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1447_202105-04-2021313": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1880_202006-06-20202031": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3490_202007-09-20202145": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2190_202006-10-20202639": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3177_201913-09-20192956": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4984_202016-12-2020163": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3183_202020-08-2020123": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4625_202023-11-2020516": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2067_202013-07-20201195": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3041_201913-09-20192940": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_939_202001-06-20202387": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1412_202131-03-2021394": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5000217_201915-07-20191518": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2189_202026-06-20201535": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4657_202020-11-2020580": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_799_202122-02-20211626": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_14_202002-01-20202068": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5158_202002-01-20213268": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_392_202103-02-20212317": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1022_202102-03-20213420": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1493_201913-05-20192840": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4788_202009-12-2020257": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_403_202101-02-20212416": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2055_202025-06-20201557": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3865_201916-11-20191171": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5058_202023-12-202036": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4511_202011-11-20202517": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3792_202021-09-20201792": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3416_201930-09-20192322": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1169_201903-05-20193071": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_875_202103-03-20211276": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2169_202005-10-20202656": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3286_202025-08-202070": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4908_202014-12-2020196": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4068_202002-11-2020876": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3466_202021-09-20201772": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4840_202016-12-20202420": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4289_201912-12-2019359": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4052_202008-10-20201393": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4223_202023-10-20201030": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_385_202125-01-20212626": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3964_202007-10-20201418": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4917_202021-12-20202404": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4394_202011-11-2020692": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3770_202028-09-20201607": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1667_201924-06-20192020": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1131_202004-03-2020281": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3752_202017-09-20201868": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_110_202104-01-20213798": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1655_202020-06-20201678": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2446_202009-07-20201297": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2873_202030-07-2020515": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_353_202127-01-20212556": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3942_202028-09-20201635": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_69_202115-02-20211868": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_8002260_201916-07-20191460": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_283_202024-01-20201420": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_749_202122-02-20211618": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_207_202017-01-20201655": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3105_202012-08-2020292": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3746_202016-09-20201902": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4503_202018-11-2020658": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5160_202005-01-20213197": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1429_202102-04-2021352": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3069_202013-08-2020267": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2631_202020-07-2020949": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_412_202129-01-20212493": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_128_202121-01-20212695": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1616_202117-04-2021140": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_637_202119-02-20211713": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4006_202008-10-20201388": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1147_202117-03-2021779": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2610_202015-07-20201120": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5000364_201916-12-2019242": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3059_202018-08-2020187": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4692_202001-12-2020401": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3872_201906-11-20191415": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4807_202014-12-20202436": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5034_202022-12-202060": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1094_202117-03-2021764": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_163_202111-01-20213728": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1763_202011-06-20201883": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2418_202015-07-20201102": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_383_202030-01-20201280": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3761_201925-10-20191561": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2117_202023-06-20201619": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2136_202022-06-20201659": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4536_202011-11-2020699": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_719_202025-02-2020515": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2385_202008-07-20201334": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3755_202024-09-20201675": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4495_202018-11-2020655": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3725_202018-09-20201831": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3444_202007-09-20202136": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4941_202021-12-202089": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4617_201903-01-20202050": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2800_201929-08-201930": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4923_202016-12-2020153": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_633_202108-02-20213550": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_676_202103-02-20213595": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1695_202009-06-20201962": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2532_201908-08-2019660": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1174_202118-03-2021731": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1734_201903-06-20192258": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1577_202009-06-20201941": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_431_202129-01-20212498": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5167_202004-01-20213240": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1989_202018-09-20202709": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2450_202010-07-20201264": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_339_202029-01-20201311": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1394_202102-04-2021345": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4869_202004-12-2020335": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3742_202012-10-20201307": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4107_202012-10-20201332": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4502_202006-11-2020797": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_936_202019-03-20205": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1282_202012-03-2020123": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4351_202030-10-2020931": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_124_202115-01-20212900": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_253_202121-01-20212708": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1366_202018-03-202020": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2945_202031-07-2020464": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1108_202027-02-2020454": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_554_202007-02-20201011": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_729_202012-02-2020858": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3825_202006-10-20201456": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3761_202003-10-20201534": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_541_202102-02-20212370": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_32_202112-01-20212997": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2554_202021-07-2020879": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1237_202003-03-2020328": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1699_202018-06-20201695": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1823_202012-06-20201851": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5030_202021-12-202098": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_494_202109-02-20212068": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4386_202031-10-2020914": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3271_202025-08-202067": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3265_202026-08-202031": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3037_201911-09-20193025": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1517_202102-04-2021356": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1810_202001-09-20202786": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1_202114-01-20212931": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_343_202024-01-20201423": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4127_202015-10-20201218": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1787_202031-08-20202790": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_414_202129-01-20212494": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3538_202015-09-20201941": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4884_202004-12-2020339": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5000235_201906-08-2019763": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3022_202007-08-2020320": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_552_202109-02-20212072": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2298_201924-07-20191157": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4000262_201922-10-20191707": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_160_202013-01-20201765": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3811_201907-11-20191373": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1382_202130-03-2021418": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4148_201927-11-2019852": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2278_201919-07-20191314": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_95_202114-01-20212936": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_706_202105-02-20213576": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_93_202115-01-20212893": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3_202105-02-202144": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_626_202110-02-20212017": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1875_202029-06-20201498": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5014_202022-12-202056": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4996_202021-12-202092": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1238_202123-03-2021569": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4840_202010-12-2020247": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2749_202021-07-2020905": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2780_202023-07-2020779": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3018_201911-09-20193022": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_741_202122-02-20211615": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2184_202024-06-20201592": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1201_201904-05-20193029": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1359_202123-03-2021587": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2140_202001-10-20202660": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3798_201930-10-20191541": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3114_202012-08-2020293": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1334_201903-05-20193081": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_813_202010-02-2020914": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3482_201914-10-20191972": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3879_202024-09-20201687": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2099_202024-09-20202685": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2730_201926-08-2019145": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3988_202008-10-20201380": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4268_201928-11-2019814": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3833_201907-11-20191375": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1024_202008-06-20202373": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_30_202007-01-20201907": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4_202002-01-20202662": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4384_201911-12-2019412": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4895_202014-12-2020195": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3626_202017-09-20201853": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1310_202126-03-2021442": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_443_202031-01-20201228": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2201_201906-08-2019749": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4026_201904-12-2019604": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4596_202021-11-20202508": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3853_202021-09-20201797": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_9_202111-01-20213044": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4056_202009-10-20201359": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5000297_201910-10-20192061": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1432_202102-04-2021353": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5088_202022-12-202073": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3031_201918-09-20192757": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3088_201923-09-20192589": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_951_202116-03-2021827": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3078_202018-08-2020191": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_447_202103-02-20213587": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1225_202012-03-2020114": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4228_202020-10-20201118": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_372_202108-02-20212103": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1964_202014-09-20202731": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_593_202108-02-20212123": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1320_202126-03-2021449": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_443_202105-02-20212199": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_569_202003-02-20201175": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_170_202119-01-20212788": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2149_202001-07-20201446": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2686_202021-07-2020890": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3843_202029-09-20201575": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_445_202003-02-20201160": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4360_202029-10-2020965": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5103_202004-01-20213234": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3470_202016-09-20201884": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1035_202028-05-20202195": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_142_202010-01-20201799": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_579_202123-02-20211556": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_716_202123-02-20211558": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3980_202006-10-20201471": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_428_202127-01-20213630": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_426_202129-01-20212496": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_962_202025-02-2020531": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4370_202031-10-2020910": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1822_202012-06-20201850": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4392_201911-12-2019415": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_832_202019-02-2020644": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4307_202031-10-2020904": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1660_202009-06-20201947": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_32_202003-01-20202652": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1193_202117-03-2021785": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_932_202025-02-2020528": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_13_202107-01-2021659": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_115_202013-02-2020923": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_896_202003-12-2020118": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_742_202109-03-20211688": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_537_202008-07-20201282": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_957_202022-12-20209": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1062_201919-10-2019507": "GRANTED", + "Bail_430_201904-05-20191396": "GRANTED", + "Bail_590_201911-06-2019909": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1303_201907-01-2020562": "DENIED", + "Bail_3839_201917-10-20192515": "DENIED", + "Bail_1152_201915-11-2019258": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_546_202010-07-20201239": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_370_202109-04-202133": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_591_202027-07-2020941": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1209_202022-12-2020733": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_354_202105-04-202167": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_720_202017-10-2020373": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_468_202005-08-202074": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_721_202028-10-2020323": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_529_202027-08-2020651": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_435_202028-07-202095": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_842_202010-11-2020233": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_305_202001-07-2020219": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_871_202010-12-202078": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_599_202017-09-2020537": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_251_202104-03-2021252": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_231_202104-03-2021246": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1051_201915-10-2019570": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_849_202018-11-2020189": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_908_202005-12-2020103": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1190_202018-12-2020862": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_780_202028-09-20203897": "GRANTED", + "Bail_739_201909-08-2019164": "DENIED", + "Bail_1087_201925-10-2019411": "DENIED", + "Bail_752_201923-07-2019449": "GRANTED", + "Bail_654_201925-06-2019776": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_407_202022-07-2020120": "DENIED", + "Bail_1064_201904-11-2019354": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_434_202007-08-202055": "DENIED", + "Bail_1023_201923-10-2019443": "DENIED", + "Bail_3787_201915-10-20192603": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_831_202008-10-20203534": "DENIED", + "Bail_855_201931-08-2019858": "DENIED", + "Bail_2689_201923-07-20192272": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_285_202109-03-2021204": "DENIED", + "Bail_220_202022-01-20201587": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_353_202020-03-2020621": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1001_202011-11-20202334": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_46_202105-01-20213865": "GRANTED", + "Bail_496_201915-05-20191277": "DENIED", + "Bail_21_202002-01-20201888": "DENIED", + "Bail_663_201902-07-2019719": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_236_202011-06-2020316": "GRANTED", + "Bail_706_201922-07-2019459": "GRANTED", + "Bail_609_201918-06-2019808": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_93_202108-01-20213728": "DENIED", + "Bail_3948_201924-10-20192350": "DENIED", + "Bail_2771_201926-07-20192190": "DENIED", + "Bail_2768_201926-07-20192187": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2_202105-01-2021674": "DENIED", + "Bail_838_201916-08-2019128": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_72_202121-01-2021561": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_15_202108-01-2021650": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_504_202027-08-2020649": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_827_202009-10-20203489": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1039_202019-11-20202243": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_217_202126-02-2021302": "GRANTED", + "Bail_980_201916-10-2019535": "DENIED", + "Bail_483_201908-05-20191355": "DENIED", + "Bail_1276_201918-12-201923": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_778_202005-11-2020274": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_687_202104-03-20211850": "DENIED", + "Bail_1202_201903-12-2019139": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_352_202002-07-2020217": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_379_202003-07-2020214": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_347_202101-04-202195": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_349_202002-07-2020216": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_161_202023-06-2020256": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1187_202018-12-2020859": "GRANTED", + "Bail_90_202030-01-2020343": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_699_202017-10-2020370": "GRANTED", + "Bail_22_202020-01-2020462": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_226_202029-06-2020228": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_839_202013-11-2020196": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_520_202021-08-202021": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1005_202106-04-2021976": "GRANTED", + "Bail_965_201918-09-2019685": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1_202101-01-20213966": "DENIED", + "Bail_3688_201920-09-20192716": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1044_202021-11-20202183": "DENIED", + "Bail_509_201923-05-20191164": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_418_202112-02-20212548": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_618_202007-08-2020578": "GRANTED", + "Bail_866_201927-08-201936": "GRANTED", + "Bail_543_201907-06-2019938": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_167_202025-06-2020250": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3441_201930-08-20193341": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_33_202010-02-2020193": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2483_201909-07-20192911": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5_202115-01-2021603": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_178_202118-01-20213466": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3601_201916-09-20192814": "DENIED", + "Bail_493_201916-05-20191259": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_330_202023-06-2020261": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_459_202030-07-202090": "GRANTED", + "Bail_42_202003-01-20201865": "GRANTED", + "Bail_804_201907-08-2019206": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_236_202126-02-2021304": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1058_202025-11-20202095": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_207_202005-06-2020355": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_639_202009-10-2020440": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_618_202019-09-2020528": "DENIED", + "Bail_721_201924-08-201952": "DENIED", + "Bail_2_202001-01-20201899": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_243_202105-03-2021236": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1025_202018-11-20202267": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_937_202017-12-202040": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_926_202014-12-202072": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_142_202029-05-2020403": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_70_202118-01-2021584": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2694_201923-07-20192274": "DENIED", + "Bail_3599_201916-09-20192812": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_963_202005-01-2021676": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_796_202007-11-2020260": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_61_202011-02-2020186": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_852_202020-11-2020174": "DENIED", + "Bail_2655_201922-07-20192295": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_351_202105-04-202166": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4046_201907-11-20192218": "GRANTED", + "Bail_893_201902-09-2019840": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_647_202006-10-2020458": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_120_202110-02-2021413": "DENIED", + "Bail_431_201903-05-20191421": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_899_202005-12-2020101": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_242_202123-02-2021345": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_105_202019-02-202097": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_158_202106-02-2021454": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_342_202020-03-2020615": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_986_202006-01-2021670": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_356_202105-02-20212762": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_435_202123-04-20219": "GRANTED", + "Bail_457_201908-05-20191352": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1216_202001-01-20213979": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_252_202103-03-2021265": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_391_202109-04-202136": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_109_202123-02-2021339": "DENIED", + "Bail_3972_201925-10-20192331": "DENIED", + "Bail_969_201917-09-2019711": "DENIED", + "Bail_4172_201920-11-20191985": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_678_202015-10-2020392": "GRANTED", + "Bail_162_202017-01-20201697": "DENIED", + "Bail_1157_201927-11-2019178": "DENIED", + "Bail_705_201917-07-2019508": "DENIED", + "Bail_2938_201902-08-20192069": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_768_202002-11-2020297": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_407_202030-05-20201785": "DENIED", + "Bail_1179_201922-11-2019203": "DENIED", + "Bail_562_201912-06-2019882": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_35_202112-01-2021623": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_127_202106-02-2021451": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4467_201923-12-2019915": "DENIED", + "Bail_1038_201922-10-2019477": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_181_202119-02-2021363": "DENIED", + "Bail_1130_201918-11-2019238": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_151_202115-01-20213535": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_532_202001-07-20201436": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_355_202105-02-20212761": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2769_201926-07-20192188": "DENIED", + "Bail_518_201927-05-20191117": "DENIED", + "Bail_1596_201902-05-20193820": "DENIED", + "Bail_2501_201915-07-20192443": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_276_202004-06-2020380": "DENIED", + "Bail_2956_201905-08-20191981": "DENIED", + "Bail_3781_201915-10-20192599": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_81_202107-01-20213759": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_14_202108-01-2021649": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_532_202123-02-20212149": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_466_202025-08-20207": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_820_202006-10-20203615": "DENIED", + "Bail_115_202009-01-20201756": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_182_202122-02-2021350": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_42_202010-02-2020195": "GRANTED", + "Bail_556_201901-06-20191022": "GRANTED", + "Bail_4069_201911-11-20192185": "DENIED", + "Bail_2698_201923-07-20192275": "DENIED", + "Bail_544_201903-06-20191003": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2213_201920-06-20193266": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_321_202107-04-202147": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_750_202023-10-2020334": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_458_202025-08-20206": "DENIED", + "Bail_4238_201929-11-20191803": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2_202101-01-20213967": "DENIED", + "Bail_1258_201903-01-2020590": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_291_202026-06-2020237": "GRANTED", + "Bail_696_201917-07-2019507": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_355_202020-03-2020623": "GRANTED", + "Bail_626_201927-06-2019767": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3_202101-01-20213968": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3258_201921-08-20191597": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_588_202016-09-2020551": "DENIED", + "Bail_3689_201920-09-20192717": "DENIED", + "Bail_1188_201903-12-2019137": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_57_202004-02-2020310": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_759_202005-11-2020271": "GRANTED", + "Bail_528_201903-06-20191001": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1200_202021-12-2020783": "GRANTED", + "Bail_653_201925-06-2019775": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_828_202003-12-2020113": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_414_202126-04-202110": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_333_202103-02-20212869": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_388_202009-07-2020190": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1139_202024-12-2020660": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1235_201907-12-2019107": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_538_202002-09-2020635": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_607_202031-07-2020788": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3788_201915-10-20192604": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_351_202105-02-20212757": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_480_202020-08-202024": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_919_202015-12-202060": "DENIED", + "Bail_872_201902-09-2019839": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2613_201918-07-20192372": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_956_202022-12-20208": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_131_202113-01-20213577": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_602_202016-09-2020554": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_107_202018-02-2020119": "GRANTED", + "Bail_933_201930-08-2019867": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_879_202126-03-20211277": "DENIED", + "Bail_4363_201913-12-20191568": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_147_202013-07-2020163": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_323_202123-03-2021149": "DENIED", + "Bail_2692_201926-07-20192183": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_397_202003-06-20201746": "DENIED", + "Bail_894_201928-08-201923": "GRANTED", + "Bail_545_201928-05-20191085": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_201_202116-02-2021398": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_320_202123-04-20211": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_41_202113-01-2021614": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_695_202006-10-2020461": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1005_202023-12-20205": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2369_201901-07-20193090": "DENIED", + "Bail_525_201924-05-20191160": "DENIED", + "Bail_1183_201922-11-2019204": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_115_202130-01-2021504": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2696_201926-07-20192184": "DENIED", + "Bail_1120_201916-11-2019248": "DENIED", + "Bail_1094_201930-10-2019388": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_815_202006-11-2020267": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_955_202021-12-202017": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_194_202001-06-2020394": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_134_202116-02-2021393": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_770_202006-11-2020265": "DENIED", + "Bail_1009_201916-10-2019538": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_360_202003-07-2020210": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_219_202125-02-2021323": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_378_202126-04-20216": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_988_202024-12-20201": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_247_202015-06-2020300": "DENIED", + "Bail_805_201906-08-2019226": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1010_202012-11-20202296": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_10_202101-01-20213975": "GRANTED", + "Bail_1238_201906-12-2019110": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_279_202106-03-2021230": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_899_202030-10-20202686": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_666_202007-10-2020454": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_146_202118-02-2021376": "GRANTED", + "Bail_558_201930-05-20191043": "GRANTED", + "Bail_3981_201901-11-20192286": "GRANTED", + "Bail_2397_201903-07-20193026": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_579_202015-09-2020568": "DENIED", + "Bail_118_202009-01-20201759": "DENIED", + "Bail_1070_201923-10-2019453": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_971_202022-12-202011": "DENIED", + "Bail_813_201905-08-2019253": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_326_202003-03-2020694": "GRANTED", + "Bail_548_201928-05-20191087": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2894_201901-10-20191797": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_787_202018-03-202049": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1547_201901-06-20191708": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2635_202029-10-20201163": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1776_201903-07-20191381": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_886_202013-05-20201313": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1306_201907-05-20192194": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_722_202012-03-2020103": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1512_202006-07-2020727": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_867_202124-03-2021556": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3169_202015-01-20212384": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2630_201916-09-20192149": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_789_202108-03-20211010": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_785_202005-11-20202740": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_400_202117-02-20211538": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1923_202026-08-202011": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2380_201929-08-201917": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2371_202029-09-20201706": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_398_201924-09-20193009": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2785_201925-09-20191929": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1756_201901-07-20191447": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_486_202103-03-20213382": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3360_201922-11-2019734": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2453_201929-08-201927": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3030_201907-11-20191050": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_827_202123-03-2021599": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_915_202107-04-2021305": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3779_201906-01-20201760": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_450_202005-03-2020174": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1189_202012-06-2020952": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2018_202017-09-20201883": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_988_202015-05-20201297": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_814_202118-03-2021764": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1784_201901-07-20191452": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1097_202028-05-20201154": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_843_202018-03-202058": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_561_202101-03-20211239": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3268_201915-11-2019899": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_752_202002-11-20202791": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_310_202104-02-20211852": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1906_202013-08-2020238": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_431_202019-02-2020417": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3836_201909-01-20201602": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1249_202018-06-2020909": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1294_202116-04-2021127": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1128_202113-04-2021188": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1160_202113-04-2021191": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_527_202017-08-20201375": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2191_202009-09-20202031": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2763_201924-09-20191959": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_855_202018-11-20202631": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2515_202013-10-20201404": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2094_201927-07-2019643": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_66_202014-01-20201497": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1443_202029-06-2020821": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1665_202017-07-2020545": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1910_201919-07-2019802": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_793_202013-03-202092": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2952_202009-12-2020566": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_601_202025-02-2020381": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2257_201913-08-2019317": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_865_202118-03-2021768": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2455_202014-10-20201381": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2405_202001-10-20201651": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_798_202108-04-20212726": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2671_201912-09-20192448": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3210_201907-11-20191057": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_536_202105-03-20211062": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_624_202104-03-20211114": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3130_202029-01-20212016": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1401_202019-06-2020901": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_450_202124-02-20211327": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_50_202120-01-20212194": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2731_201924-09-20191952": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3809_201917-01-20201435": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2925_202014-12-2020194": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1610_201911-07-20191163": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_602_202103-03-20211158": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_383_202109-02-20211737": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_979_202021-05-20201218": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2304_201930-08-20192747": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1076_202002-06-20201086": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_73_202009-01-20201581": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2063_201925-07-2019707": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_708_202109-03-2021948": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_834_202110-03-2021909": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_697_202106-03-20211037": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2393_202012-10-20201427": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_409_202124-02-20213460": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_112_202018-05-20201574": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1028_202101-04-2021459": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2814_202025-11-2020748": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2138_201902-08-2019511": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2603_201923-09-20191986": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_31_202021-01-20202128": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_722_202109-03-2021953": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2991_201911-10-20191631": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2268_201917-08-2019239": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1893_202020-08-2020128": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_961_202101-04-2021454": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2111_201901-08-2019553": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3053_202006-01-20212567": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3170_201919-11-2019831": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1385_202021-07-2020464": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2352_201921-08-2019167": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_703_202029-02-2020251": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1801_201916-07-2019884": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2208_201909-08-2019343": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3370_201920-11-2019811": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2639_201916-09-20192150": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_424_202027-02-2020284": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_427_202108-02-20211747": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3002_202018-12-202069": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100_202008-01-20201626": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2862_202002-12-2020674": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2082_202010-09-20202011": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_246_201916-07-20192402": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2621_201923-09-20191987": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3477_201905-12-2019509": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1528_202020-07-2020496": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_775_202109-03-2021959": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_905_202123-03-2021602": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2971_202011-12-2020524": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1162_202113-04-2021192": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_436_202116-02-20211568": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1299_202023-06-2020882": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_185_202030-01-20201059": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3229_201915-11-2019897": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3807_201909-01-20201598": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1112_202008-06-20201027": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2679_202002-11-20201118": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2119_201914-08-2019285": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2942_201916-10-20191524": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3072_202021-12-202043": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1539_201903-06-20191694": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1926_201915-07-2019922": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2313_202005-10-20201592": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1253_202122-04-202117": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3595_201917-12-2019124": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2241_201907-08-2019419": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1406_201920-05-20191942": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2324_202006-10-20201552": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_94_202112-01-20214070": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1131_202002-06-20201090": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_946_202120-03-2021702": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_860_202110-03-2021912": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3485_201913-12-2019334": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2024_201901-08-2019545": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2713_201921-09-20192017": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_148_202004-06-20201544": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_882_202020-11-20202621": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2822_201928-09-20191852": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2779_201901-10-20191784": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_665_202122-03-20212992": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_139_202029-05-20201555": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_633_202026-02-2020349": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_720_202003-03-2020230": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_716_202109-03-2021951": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_274_202105-02-20213749": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1111_202018-12-20202296": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_751_202002-11-20202790": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2651_201913-09-20192414": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_445_202005-02-2020952": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_848_202117-03-2021812": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_610_202124-02-20211337": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_627_202103-03-20211159": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1358_201914-05-20192067": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2773_202020-11-2020817": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_19_202107-01-20212535": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2043_201925-07-2019703": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2111_202004-09-20202102": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1368_201909-05-20192146": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3825_201906-01-20201767": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2987_202013-01-20212421": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2060_201919-07-2019812": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_557_202105-03-20211063": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_677_202109-03-2021947": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1006_202019-05-20201254": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1355_202023-06-2020885": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_95_202120-01-20212196": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1737_202022-07-2020454": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2662_202005-11-20201020": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2842_202004-12-2020630": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2501_201902-09-20192707": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2974_201921-10-20191398": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1637_201921-06-20191577": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_326_202028-01-20201132": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3220_201907-11-20191058": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_700_202022-10-20202877": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2378_202008-10-20201478": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_597_202025-02-2020378": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1503_201929-05-20191781": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_908_202016-05-20201271": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2099_202004-09-20202098": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_646_202026-02-2020352": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2342_201916-08-2019271": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1642_201920-06-20191600": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_146_202116-01-20212330": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2778_202023-11-2020775": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3112_201921-10-20191406": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2346_201907-09-20192507": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_734_202107-04-2021302": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_33_202009-01-20201579": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_279_202102-02-20211931": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1485_202017-07-2020520": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_32_202011-02-20202107": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2744_202012-11-2020863": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_637_202108-03-2021988": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_726_202122-03-2021638": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_707_202126-03-20212863": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3784_201903-01-20201899": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2030_201930-07-2019604": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3798_201906-01-20201763": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2631_201913-09-20192411": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3233_201913-11-2019974": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2032_202010-09-20202007": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2238_202021-09-20201821": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2638_201919-09-20192065": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2519_202016-10-20201357": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_114_202020-01-20201362": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_393_201922-10-20192929": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_125_202127-01-20212108": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1107_202125-03-2021540": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1615_202017-07-2020531": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_160_202015-01-20201472": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2403_202008-10-20201482": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3792_201929-01-20201104": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2976_202001-01-20212654": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_813_202019-03-202032": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_527_202118-02-20211507": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_274_202102-02-20211929": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1770_201908-07-20191253": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3342_201911-11-20191014": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2184_201914-08-2019289": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1338_201906-05-20192234": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1928_202021-08-202098": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1184_202107-04-2021317": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2467_202012-10-20201433": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2224_202017-09-20201896": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1181_202107-04-2021314": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2861_202023-11-2020791": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2374_201927-08-201969": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1063_202027-05-20201177": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1213_202107-04-2021328": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2211_202019-09-20201835": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3022_201918-10-20191466": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_711_202102-03-20211210": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_176_202020-01-20201365": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1324_202007-07-2020699": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_19_202014-01-20202143": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1654_202022-07-2020448": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1941_202021-08-2020102": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3001_202005-12-2020614": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1839_201908-07-20191258": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1952_201918-07-2019823": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_445_202126-02-20213435": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3279_201911-11-20191009": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2550_201906-09-20192547": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_532_202119-02-20211464": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2847_201926-09-20191906": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3034_201918-10-20191468": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_491_202118-02-20211504": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1768_201926-06-20191514": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2899_201917-10-20191496": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3068_201922-10-20191373": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1669_201911-07-20191164": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2556_202021-10-20201290": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2730_202009-11-2020950": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1900330_201906-09-20193041": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_808_202108-03-20211011": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_807_202110-03-2021905": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2073_202003-09-20202139": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_603_202117-03-20213093": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_422_202115-02-20211608": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2794_201904-10-20191717": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2922_201907-10-20191680": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1620_201925-06-20191528": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_318_202003-07-20201506": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2852_202014-12-2020192": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_125_202023-01-20201245": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2386_201927-08-201972": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1799_201908-07-20191254": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_333_202110-02-20211720": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1690_201928-06-20191480": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3048_202017-12-202099": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1982_202026-08-202017": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_363_202118-02-20213543": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3094_202017-12-2020100": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_385_202110-02-20211726": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2714_201920-09-20192040": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2588_202022-10-20201256": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3079_201901-11-20191179": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_528_202116-02-20211572": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2408_202008-10-20201483": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2704_202025-11-2020745": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2045_201931-07-2019577": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1410_201917-05-20192000": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_900_202025-11-20202576": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2459_201903-09-20192665": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_809_202105-04-20212799": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1290_202025-06-2020841": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_613_202026-02-2020347": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_145_202116-01-20212329": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2423_201930-08-20192760": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2797_201911-11-20191003": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2951_202016-12-2020130": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_766_202009-06-20201000": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3090_202021-12-202051": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_76_202017-01-20201417": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3368_201920-11-2019810": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_49_202111-01-20212494": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2301_202012-10-20201423": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_357_202031-01-20201048": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2423_202005-10-20201600": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2013_201917-07-2019863": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1601_202021-08-202087": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3043_201916-10-20191531": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_748_202002-11-20202787": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2716_201919-09-20192075": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1787_201926-06-20191516": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2309_202007-10-20201514": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3332_201913-11-2019987": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_723_202012-03-2020104": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_211_202129-01-20212008": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1902_202020-08-2020130": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3598_201910-12-2019428": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_340_202108-02-20211746": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2916_202016-12-2020126": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2109_201906-08-2019438": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3070_201921-10-20191402": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2669_202009-11-2020945": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5_202110-02-20211710": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1846_202031-07-2020333": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3760_201902-01-20201930": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_596_202117-03-20213090": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_790_202029-05-20201114": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1469_201928-05-20191797": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_196_202102-02-20211920": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_939_202027-11-20202519": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_256_202029-01-20201096": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1142_202105-04-2021388": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_181_202127-01-20212115": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_395_202017-02-2020479": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_968_202105-04-2021373": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_355_202106-02-20211772": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3172_201924-10-20191322": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2546_201913-09-20192402": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_317_202111-02-20213654": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_231_202102-02-20211925": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_317_202004-02-2020968": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1720_201916-07-2019882": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_228_201904-07-20192431": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1402_201914-05-20192075": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_194_202126-02-20211266": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_574_202103-03-20211154": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3337_201925-11-2019677": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3657_201910-12-2019438": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2359_201928-08-201941": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1742_201908-07-20191252": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_188_202027-01-20201180": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1802_202006-08-2020278": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1715_202013-08-2020225": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2670_201923-09-20191988": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_863_202117-03-2021813": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1147_202102-04-2021438": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2726_201919-09-20192076": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3816_201909-01-20201599": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_368_202118-02-20213547": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_351_202031-01-20201046": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2840_202025-11-2020752": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2984_201914-10-20191590": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2236_202028-09-20201710": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_952_202015-05-20201293": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_262_202110-02-20211717": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1477_202002-07-2020780": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1994_202001-09-20202195": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_327_202115-02-20213617": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_391_201924-10-20192919": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_651_202122-03-20212979": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3146_202001-01-20212657": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_577_202026-02-2020344": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2791_202023-11-2020776": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_219_201901-07-20192447": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2223_202017-09-20201895": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3060_202029-01-20212014": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_365_202003-02-2020994": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_796_202110-03-2021901": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2596_202010-11-2020910": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_723_202108-03-2021996": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3251_201907-11-20191060": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2980_202009-12-2020568": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2376_201928-08-201944": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1895_201908-07-20191264": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_983_202113-04-2021177": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_365_202116-02-20213605": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3075_202021-12-202045": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_578_202119-02-20211471": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_224_202102-02-20211923": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1508_201904-06-20191663": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_147_202118-01-20214005": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3670_201924-12-201911": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3104_202013-01-20212426": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_878_202126-03-2021494": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_253_202110-02-20211716": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_836_202116-03-2021853": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3117_202017-12-2020103": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3465_201928-11-2019601": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2377_202007-10-20201523": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_957_202019-05-20201246": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_87_202128-01-20212051": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_67_202008-01-20201621": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1183_202107-04-2021316": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1976_202001-09-20202192": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1301_201906-05-20192224": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_798_202018-03-202051": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_148_202120-01-20212203": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3088_202021-12-202049": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2182_201909-08-2019341": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2897_202003-12-2020654": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_844_202021-05-20201213": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1441_202026-06-2020832": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3692_201911-12-2019407": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1053_201906-05-20192216": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_988_202105-04-2021376": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_295_202117-02-20211526": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3679_201910-01-20201542": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2909_201907-10-20191678": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_724_202105-03-20211078": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_661_202003-03-2020220": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1423_202026-06-2020829": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1452_201922-05-20191891": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2228_201927-08-201960": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3_202129-01-20211999": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1097_202109-04-2021249": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2040_201924-07-2019737": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_489_202027-02-2020285": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2399_202007-10-20201526": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1650_202006-08-2020273": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_414_202125-02-20213440": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_901538_201926-06-20191518": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1730_202024-07-2020405": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_395_202123-02-20213491": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_436_202126-02-20213427": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_93_202008-01-20201622": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_963_202028-05-20201146": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2510_201911-09-20192468": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_767_202017-03-202067": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3198_201905-11-20191128": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_697_202022-10-20202874": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1339_202024-06-2020858": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1061_202126-03-2021502": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3439_201922-11-2019743": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2960_201910-10-20191661": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_884_202023-11-20202608": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1116_202107-04-2021309": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1222_202112-04-2021211": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2361_201928-08-201943": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_933_202027-11-20202513": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3597_201911-12-2019401": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1143_202101-04-2021465": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2714_202011-12-2020516": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1842_201905-07-20191319": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2036_202016-09-20201916": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_84_202013-05-20201592": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2298_201916-08-2019264": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1357_201913-05-20192093": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1489_202017-07-2020521": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2973_202010-12-2020547": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2803_202003-12-2020648": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_757_202118-03-2021761": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3044_202005-01-20212591": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_37_202120-01-20212193": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_608_202122-02-20211407": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2105_202004-09-20202100": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1524_202008-07-2020683": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1138_201906-05-20192217": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1014_202123-03-2021610": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3050_201918-10-20191470": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1829_202017-08-2020193": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_486_202010-02-2020637": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3581_201905-12-2019514": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_600_202025-02-2020380": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_567_202119-02-20211469": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2083_202003-09-20202143": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2600_201912-09-20192440": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_540_202109-03-20213192": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_896_202013-05-20201317": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1276_201903-05-20192269": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2460_202009-10-20201458": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_735_202005-03-2020186": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1585_202009-07-2020660": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_674_202108-03-2021992": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_60_202106-01-20214119": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2253_202023-09-20201784": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1888_201910-07-20191209": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2451_202012-10-20201431": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1677_202023-07-2020420": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2964_202009-12-2020567": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2517_202014-10-20201385": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3025_202015-12-2020171": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2656_202002-11-20201115": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2124_201905-08-2019462": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3379_201902-12-2019553": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3114_201931-10-20191222": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_446_202005-02-2020953": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3150_201931-10-20191224": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3545_201903-12-2019539": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_144_202118-01-20214003": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3714_201924-12-201912": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2782_201927-09-20191864": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2349_202001-10-20201642": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1951_201916-07-2019897": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1889_202016-09-20201911": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_53_202111-01-20212496": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_347_202117-02-20213567": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1689_202027-07-2020386": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_908_202124-03-2021560": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3834_201917-01-20201438": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2479_202016-10-20201353": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2107_201902-08-2019508": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2975_201911-10-20191628": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_93_202008-01-20201623": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3386_201920-11-2019815": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_901537_201931-05-20191726": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2155_202024-09-20201740": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_271_201924-07-20192378": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1959_202003-09-20202122": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2727_202020-11-2020812": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3750_201915-01-20201476": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_101_202014-01-20201501": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_195_202102-02-20211919": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1962_202026-08-202014": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1232_201901-05-20192304": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2231_201913-08-2019315": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1869_202007-08-2020264": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1695_201903-07-20191374": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_705_202125-03-20212896": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_252_202028-01-20201127": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3723_201920-12-201965": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_946_202015-05-20201290": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2606_201911-09-20192478": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_984_202107-04-2021306": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_591_202120-02-20211431": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2932_202026-11-2020733": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2677_201919-09-20192067": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1111_202008-06-20201026": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_207_202118-02-20211494": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2686_202018-11-2020837": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_978_202018-05-20201266": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2038_201925-07-2019701": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2345_202028-09-20201714": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_235_202102-02-20213850": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3403_201922-11-2019739": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_540_202126-02-20211268": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3783_201924-12-201915": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3334_201922-11-2019731": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1952_202025-08-202044": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_116_202012-02-2020563": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1777_201902-07-20191415": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3382_201926-11-2019654": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2015_201923-07-2019756": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_546_202123-02-20211384": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2480_202016-10-20201354": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1905_202017-08-2020201": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_514_202019-08-20201360": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3211_201931-10-20191226": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_741_202108-03-20211000": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_559_202124-02-20211334": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1680_202024-07-2020402": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2604_201909-09-20192496": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_784_202124-03-2021550": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_609_202028-02-2020269": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1458_202017-07-2020519": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2287_201924-08-2019107": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3700_201909-01-20201593": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1931_202024-08-202067": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_337_202117-02-20211531": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1638_202017-07-2020537": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1972_201917-07-2019860": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_14_202008-01-20201616": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_753_202117-03-2021805": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1713_202027-07-2020387": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_224_201903-07-20192439": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_701_202103-03-20211167": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1824_202021-08-202088": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2234_201909-08-2019347": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1143_202027-05-20201185": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1918_202025-08-202039": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_188_202119-01-20212253": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2689_202009-11-2020947": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2276_202021-09-20201823": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3728_201917-12-2019129": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_991_202125-03-2021537": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_284_202004-02-2020964": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2414_201912-09-20192431": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_562_202116-03-20213122": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2291_201913-09-20192396": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1293_201701-10-20192991": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_808_202108-04-20212731": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2447_202007-10-20201534": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1138_202005-06-20201060": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3163_202023-12-20209": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2712_202023-11-2020771": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1453_202002-07-2020776": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_726_202029-10-20202822": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3599_201910-12-2019429": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3030_202007-12-2020602": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2715_202011-11-2020886": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3160_202005-01-20212593": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_126_202118-01-20212296": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1024_202029-05-20201122": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1875_201905-07-20191326": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_949_202122-03-2021655": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1421_201917-05-20192006": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_30_202104-01-20214146": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2338_202007-10-20201519": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2533_201913-09-20192400": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_329_202006-07-20201498": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_665_202110-03-2021898": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2722_202009-11-2020949": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1125_202113-04-2021185": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2953_201911-10-20191625": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_883_202023-11-20202607": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_658_202105-03-20211067": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_777_202006-03-2020162": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2251_202023-09-20201783": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2551_201905-09-20192598": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_651_202004-03-2020199": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_737_202018-03-202045": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_343_202031-01-20201045": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_822_202017-03-202074": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_253_202031-01-20201035": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1890_202025-08-202036": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_239_201908-07-20192423": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3299_201913-11-2019981": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_72_202005-03-20201957": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_86_202014-01-20201499": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1227_201909-05-20192138": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1646_202004-09-20202092": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3132_202020-01-20212208": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1079_202027-05-20201179": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_806_202124-03-2021552": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_12_202009-01-20202716": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3202_201902-11-20191164": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_5_202002-01-20202156": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_56_202118-01-20212288": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3738_201924-12-201913": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1606_201924-06-20191548": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2703_201919-09-20192073": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2561_201912-09-20192436": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3074_202021-12-202044": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_366_202112-02-20211642": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1296_202017-06-2020928": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_70_202005-03-20201955": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_135_202021-01-20201302": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3116_202005-01-20212592": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2054_202003-09-20202135": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_721_202118-03-2021758": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3474_201911-12-2019391": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2872_201904-10-20191719": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_26_202104-01-20214142": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2117_201902-08-2019509": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_223_202102-02-20213839": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1581_202008-07-2020693": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1351_202001-07-2020797": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1230_202017-06-2020923": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3790_201901-01-20201944": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3121_201913-11-2019970": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_33_202113-01-20212414": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_509_202017-02-2020486": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3445_201929-11-2019577": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2930_201913-11-2019968": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3157_202011-01-20212501": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1746_201901-07-20191445": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3055_201925-10-20191273": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1809_201909-07-20191233": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_949_202019-05-20201245": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_943_202014-05-20201304": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2586_201907-09-20192517": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_161_202020-01-20201363": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_26_202118-01-20212283": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2129_201906-08-2019439": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_794_202122-03-2021639": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2206_202016-09-20201930": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2890_202002-12-2020676": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3217_202007-01-20212548": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2311_202005-10-20201591": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_699_202022-10-20202876": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2671_202011-11-2020885": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2161_201901-08-2019559": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3578_201909-12-2019464": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_456_202013-02-2020548": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2852_201903-10-20191757": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1984_201918-07-2019828": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_765_202125-03-2021531": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3216_202018-01-20212307": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2498_202023-11-2020765": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2295_201922-08-2019123": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2869_202023-11-2020794": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1937_202017-08-2020203": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2720_201923-09-20191992": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_849_202003-06-20201078": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_907_202124-03-2021559": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1325_202024-06-2020856": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1028_202028-05-20201149": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_197_202024-01-20201216": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2892_201903-10-20191760": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_164_202113-01-20214055": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3087_202021-12-202048": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1919_202024-08-202064": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1005_202029-05-20201120": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3240_201906-11-20191094": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1575_202016-07-2020563": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3001_201914-10-20191592": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_110_202107-01-20212540": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2864_201910-10-20191654": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2154_202008-09-20202042": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_945_202019-05-20201244": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2267_201914-08-2019294": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_308_202104-02-20211851": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1976_201906-08-2019433": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2788_202009-11-2020959": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_12_202020-01-20201350": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3007_201910-10-20191665": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_354_202117-02-20211534": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_180_202130-01-20211981": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1491_202022-07-2020440": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3009_201914-10-20191595": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1339_201906-05-20192235": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1049_202123-03-2021612": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_28_202118-01-20212284": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_951_202015-05-20201292": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_507_202110-03-2021891": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3216_201905-11-20191131": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_532_202108-03-20213241": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_240_202128-01-20212066": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_564_202116-03-20213124": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_316_201703-09-20193058": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_314_202116-02-20211565": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1393_202002-07-2020772": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3635_201902-01-20201915": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2033_201922-07-2019770": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2578_201913-09-20192404": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2212_202010-09-20202026": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_337_202006-02-2020908": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1153_202109-04-2021251": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2457_202012-10-20201432": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1176_202002-06-20201092": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1723_202021-07-2020482": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2141_201908-08-2019383": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_334_202116-02-20213593": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1962_201922-07-2019766": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2360_201917-08-2019242": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1155_202006-06-20201040": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_580_202028-02-2020267": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_645_202104-03-20211116": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_647_202024-02-2020403": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_237_202029-01-20201093": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2207_201913-08-2019309": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2928_201903-10-20191762": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2538_201913-09-20192401": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1304_202009-06-20201017": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2799_201927-09-20191868": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1475_202009-07-2020649": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2102_201925-07-2019710": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2981_201915-10-20191556": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_740_202012-03-2020106": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1493_202017-07-2020522": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_338_201918-09-20193020": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3492_201925-11-2019689": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_764_202105-04-20212791": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3757_201904-01-20201798": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3107_202017-12-2020102": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2734_202010-11-2020917": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2581_201917-09-20192115": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_38_202029-01-20201084": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_730_202005-03-2020185": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1966_201916-07-2019902": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1709_201927-06-20191498": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1518_202006-07-2020728": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_36_202116-01-20212326": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1349_202002-07-2020768": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3219_202011-01-20212505": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3019_201903-10-20191765": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1768_202031-07-2020326": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1408_202008-07-2020671": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2733_202023-11-2020773": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_646_202117-03-2021801": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3621_201909-12-2019467": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2895_201910-10-20191655": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2372_201929-08-201915": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1010_202008-06-20201023": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3400_201921-11-2019783": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3021_201918-10-20191465": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1990_201918-07-2019831": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1087_202027-05-20201182": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_148_202022-01-20201275": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1265_202113-04-2021200": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_119_202113-01-20214054": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2461_201904-09-20192631": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1039_202124-03-2021571": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1064_202029-05-20201124": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1980_201917-07-2019861": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_709_202126-03-20212864": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2471_202013-10-20201400": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2041_201925-07-2019702": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_113_202119-01-20212248": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2308_201926-08-201993": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_647_202109-03-2021946": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_87_202014-01-20201500": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1367_201909-05-20192145": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2544_202003-11-20201085": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2214_202017-09-20201894": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2284_201922-08-2019122": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_75_202005-03-20201960": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_894_202124-03-2021557": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_188_202128-01-20213931": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_525_202025-02-2020370": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_64_202118-01-20212290": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1676_201903-07-20191369": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2362_201922-08-2019125": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_167_202128-01-20212061": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_614_202124-02-20211338": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2326_201919-08-2019219": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2499_201913-09-20192399": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100183_201901-05-20192316": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_137_201906-05-20192512": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_3021_202014-12-2020197": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application old_153_201914-06-2019225": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_416_202109-04-2021357": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_87_202106-02-2021978": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_74_202120-03-202192": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_425_202114-04-2021297": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_144_202122-02-2021864": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_343_202010-11-2020105": "DENIED", + "Bail Application old_159_201919-11-2019816": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_423_202112-04-2021311": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_402_202019-12-202014": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_69_202005-08-202048": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_507_202016-12-2020264": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application old_210_201912-12-2019657": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_188_202015-07-2020277": "DENIED", + "Bail Application old_356_201906-11-2019236": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_53_202126-02-2021162": "DENIED", + "Bail Application old_85_201914-10-20191059": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_368_202008-12-202036": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_44_202110-02-2021208": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application old_147_201914-06-2019223": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_379_202102-04-2021551": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_23_202028-01-2020254": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_157_202015-06-2020318": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_83_202105-03-2021143": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_477_202007-12-2020322": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application old_171_201928-11-2019756": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application old_153_201916-11-2019837": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_117_202126-03-202163": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_164_202124-02-2021846": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_367_202102-04-2021545": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application old_107_201917-10-20191023": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_348_202017-11-202092": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_52_202119-01-20211084": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_394_202014-12-202021": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_124_202019-05-2020373": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_105_202109-02-2021960": "DENIED", + "Bail Application old_58_201904-10-20191100": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_474_202004-12-2020344": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_315_202012-11-202094": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_155_202108-04-202118": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_326_202003-10-2020675": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_112_202120-03-202195": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application old_48_201901-10-20191124": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_317_202122-03-2021668": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_192_202015-07-2020281": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_32_202111-01-20211164": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application old_388_201920-11-2019172": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_412_202015-01-2021266": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_205_202029-07-202073": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_251_202020-08-2020180": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_145_202122-02-2021865": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_149_202109-04-202112": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_405_202107-04-2021428": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_180_202020-06-2020299": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application old_134_201902-11-2019935": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_398_202005-11-2020504": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_178_202018-06-2020310": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_72_202102-02-2021992": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application old_284_201919-09-2019394": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application old_221_201915-07-2019130": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_376_202021-10-2020556": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application old_15_201924-09-20191166": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_130_202029-05-2020362": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_399_202023-12-20204": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_339_202020-11-202082": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_463_202002-12-2020365": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application old_200_201910-12-2019683": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application old_101_201916-10-20191039": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_303_202021-09-2020714": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_401_202021-12-202012": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_170_202018-06-2020308": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application old_94_201915-10-20191047": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_326_202123-03-2021651": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_156_202112-04-202110": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_184_202015-07-2020273": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_10_202028-01-2020252": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_370_202010-12-202031": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_80_202109-03-2021132": "DENIED", + "Bail Application old_337_201905-11-2019240": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_125_202019-05-2020374": "DENIED", + "Bail Application old_161_201920-11-2019804": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application old_151_201913-11-2019864": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_391_202106-04-2021498": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_183_202015-07-2020272": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_164_202016-06-2020314": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_341_202006-10-2020650": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_101_202110-02-2021947": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_159_202015-06-2020320": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_131_202125-03-202173": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_337_202024-11-202069": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_87_202110-03-2021127": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_458_202027-11-2020387": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application old_391_201913-11-2019219": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_273_202117-03-2021705": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_181_202019-06-2020302": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_420_202005-11-2020511": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_304_202005-10-2020139": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_298_202119-03-2021687": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_321_202011-11-202098": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_280_202010-09-2020172": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_5_202102-01-20211230": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_374_202027-11-202062": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_325_202030-09-2020685": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_362_202131-03-2021598": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_238_202028-07-2020212": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_376_202004-12-202046": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_296_202022-09-2020150": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_37_202112-01-20211151": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_322_202114-04-2021292": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application old_82_201914-10-20191056": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_258_202115-03-2021731": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103_202109-02-2021958": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application old_186_201904-12-2019707": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_295_202001-10-2020142": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_79_202117-03-2021109": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application old_190_201906-12-2019697": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_522_202023-12-2020209": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_491_202016-12-2020251": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_121_202105-04-202134": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_65_202126-02-2021163": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_165_202124-02-2021847": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_90_202109-03-2021134": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_245_202112-03-2021743": "DENIED", + "Bail Application old_162_201920-11-2019805": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_316_202125-03-2021627": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application old_434_201907-12-201995": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_464_202002-12-2020366": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_425_202010-11-2020464": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_471_202004-12-2020341": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_331_202003-10-2020676": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_94_202027-05-2020158": "DENIED", + "Bail Application old_465_201917-01-2020296": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_286_202118-03-2021700": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application old_167_201926-11-2019775": "DENIED", + "Bail Application old_27_201903-10-20191114": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_161_202012-06-2020327": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_375_202016-12-202016": "DENIED", + "Bail Application old_314_201903-10-2019339": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_212_202016-07-2020262": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_407_202022-12-20208": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_430_202112-04-2021315": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_226_202020-07-2020242": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_373_202102-04-2021547": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100_202109-03-2021136": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_36_202005-02-2020231": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_187_202005-08-202052": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_379_202003-12-202050": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_139_202122-02-2021863": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application old_33_202027-01-2020257": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_357_202126-03-2021619": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_501_202016-12-2020258": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_433_202113-04-2021304": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_104_202117-03-2021111": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application old_418_201904-12-2019105": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_39_202007-01-2020425": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_775_201916-08-2019144": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1548_201904-12-2019305": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_900_202009-09-2020643": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1471_201921-11-2019453": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1094_201905-09-20191092": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_915_202001-10-2020572": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1260_202025-11-2020216": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_287_202123-03-202181": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1024_201913-09-20191023": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1492_201905-12-2019264": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_92_202005-12-202017": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1424_201918-11-2019490": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_680_202006-08-2020139": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1472_201905-12-2019263": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1078_201922-10-2019760": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1081_202010-11-2020267": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_93_202027-02-202072": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_887_201913-08-2019163": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1291_202011-12-2020128": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_156_202016-05-2020557": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_481_202011-06-2020396": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_426_202009-06-2020417": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_200_202027-02-202080": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1430_202007-01-2021613": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1339_202014-01-2021571": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_684_202014-08-202078": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1320_201904-12-2019285": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_36_202109-02-2021416": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1511_201928-11-2019373": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_21_202006-01-2020446": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1266_201907-11-2019508": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_722_202020-08-202060": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1099_202023-10-2020386": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_526_201917-05-2019861": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_847_202003-09-2020671": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_590_201906-06-2019726": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_702_202010-08-2020119": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_133_202023-01-2020262": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1034_201919-09-2019943": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_565_202029-06-2020339": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_197_202119-02-2021321": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_493_202001-07-2020316": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_750_201911-07-2019380": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_571_201920-06-2019500": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_98_202105-03-2021225": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1319_202011-12-2020131": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_687_201905-09-20191084": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1536_201910-12-2019219": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_508_202002-07-2020311": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_804_201925-07-2019248": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_73_201913-05-20191117": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_202_202026-05-2020506": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1066_202011-11-2020248": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_34_202023-01-2020250": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1241_201914-10-2019832": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1240_202011-12-2020123": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_809_202022-09-2020605": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_741_202024-08-202040": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_54_202117-03-202155": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_33_202021-01-2020287": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_376_202003-06-2020449": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_31_202031-01-2020196": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1331_201924-10-2019648": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1183_202016-12-202051": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_145_202116-02-2021373": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_24_202104-02-2021465": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_724_202024-08-202037": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_329_202105-04-202128": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_940_201911-09-20191044": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_879_201909-08-2019186": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_4_202003-02-2020172": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_73_202003-11-202082": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1379_202007-01-2021610": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_321_202125-03-202160": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_896_201928-08-201926": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_94_202005-12-202019": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1022_201911-09-20191050": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1653_201924-01-2020242": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_522_201916-05-2019876": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_28_202126-02-2021221": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_464_202015-06-2020372": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_87_202021-01-2020293": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1223_202020-11-2020230": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_961_201922-08-201970": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_18_202002-01-2020485": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_697_201901-07-2019469": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_83_202025-02-202095": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1170_201923-09-2019924": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_882_201916-08-2019148": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1643_201907-01-2020435": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1401_201929-11-2019340": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_654_202022-07-2020205": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_607_201904-07-2019424": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1098_201923-09-2019919": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1019_202014-10-2020497": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_11_202002-01-2020482": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1286_202004-12-2020182": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_43_202001-10-2020121": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_962_202006-10-2020561": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_318_202125-03-202159": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1296_202007-12-2020171": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1388_201907-01-2020426": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_68_202020-01-2020324": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1440_202018-03-2021135": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_444_202011-06-2020391": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_222_202119-03-2021122": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_138_202026-05-2020503": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1108_202029-10-2020354": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1351_201919-11-2019470": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_75_201914-05-20191115": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_44_202027-01-2020218": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1341_202014-12-202070": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1284_201915-10-2019814": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_410_201916-05-2019869": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_78_201928-05-20191108": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_733_202014-08-202082": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1190_202025-11-2020213": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_364_202107-04-20217": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_351_201927-05-2019811": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_920_202013-10-2020501": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1639_201906-01-2020460": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_691_202014-08-202079": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_902_201904-09-20191101": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1279_202012-02-2021382": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_563_201931-05-2019766": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_366_202021-07-2020209": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_747_201923-07-2019272": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_224_202103-03-2021259": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_861_202001-10-2020569": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_369_202005-06-2020434": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1266_202007-12-2020165": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_26_202006-08-202061": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_20_202031-01-2020195": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_99_202003-03-202045": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_150_202028-02-202067": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_732_201911-07-2019378": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_90_202014-01-2020374": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_254_202119-03-2021125": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_13_202002-01-2020484": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_323_202106-04-202118": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_107_202117-02-2021363": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_952_201919-08-2019136": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_763_202013-08-2020102": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_486_202022-07-2020200": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_21_202018-02-2020158": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1051_201906-09-20191071": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_733_201902-07-2019459": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1086_202015-12-202058": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_895_202031-10-2020341": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_98_202020-01-2020332": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_533_202014-07-2020257": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_618_202021-07-2020219": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1426_202014-01-2021573": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_339_202106-04-202123": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_896_202023-09-2020597": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1383_201905-12-2019259": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1011_201928-08-201933": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_227_202021-05-2020529": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1329_201924-10-2019646": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_72_202002-11-202086": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_858_201919-09-2019939": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1487_201925-11-2019418": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_70_202029-10-202092": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1528_201929-11-2019345": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_310_202124-03-202172": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1248_202002-12-2020186": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_273_202122-03-202194": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_672_202028-08-2020697": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_24_202019-02-2020137": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1522_201916-12-201977": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_708_201923-07-2019268": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_319_202131-03-202148": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_591_202014-07-2020262": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_536_202013-07-2020268": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1425_202004-03-2021249": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_715_201918-07-2019330": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_662_202007-08-2020126": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1169_201914-10-2019829": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1420_202013-01-2021590": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1016_202014-10-2020496": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_671_202028-08-2020696": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_914_201930-09-2019861": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_966_202020-10-2020420": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_150_202023-01-2020265": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1498_201921-01-2020299": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1202_202021-12-202015": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1061_201902-09-20191127": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1068_201902-09-20191129": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_137_202118-02-2021337": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_789_202017-08-202070": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1292_202021-12-202016": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1243_202011-12-2020125": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_265_202102-04-202134": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_270_202019-05-2020544": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_767_202027-08-2020717": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_66_202008-01-2020417": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_277_202102-04-202135": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1035_201928-08-201934": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1230_202004-12-2020180": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_677_202025-08-202019": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1057_201913-09-20191025": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_199_202112-03-2021176": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1370_201925-11-2019411": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_706_201902-07-2019454": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_243_202013-03-20205": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1408_202024-07-2020262": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2941_201921-09-20192641": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3626_201920-08-20192800": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1101_202119-03-20213128": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2450_201928-08-201980": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2361_201913-08-2019431": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1257_202125-03-20212761": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2092_202016-09-20207415": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3836_201913-09-201911003": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3701_201916-11-20191100": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2989_201916-07-20193780": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2422_202024-11-20201445": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3721_201922-11-2019865": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1736_202012-08-20201403": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1473_202012-10-20202389": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__5645_201902-01-20205584": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3695_201920-11-2019957": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4618_201911-10-20198385": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_823_202106-03-20213825": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4111_201911-12-2019379": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__5194_201921-11-20196944": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1058_202117-03-20213310": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2205_202017-10-20202265": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2563_202009-12-2020569": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3304_201916-10-20192009": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__243_202022-01-20201217": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1090_202004-07-2020687": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1664_202031-07-20201578": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2776_201916-09-20193237": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1705_202006-08-20201511": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3168_201925-07-20193480": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2185_201930-07-2019725": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_594_202122-02-20214521": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1013_202116-03-20213381": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1062_201922-05-20192036": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__1730_201901-07-20191518": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3121_201915-10-20192033": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__5284_201928-11-20196703": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2264_201921-05-20196380": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_272_202125-01-20215583": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_253_202013-02-20202719": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2076_202013-10-20202364": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4116_201916-01-20201333": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__29_202002-01-20205579": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_142_202020-02-2020421": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_332_202103-02-20215331": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2577_201916-09-20193231": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3167_201923-07-20193540": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_442_202109-02-20214999": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_800_202026-05-20203509": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_266_201915-10-2019678": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_767_202103-03-20214057": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_292_202129-01-20215423": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4308_201921-01-20201237": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1259_202030-06-20202645": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__1687_201901-07-20191515": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1107_202013-10-20202346": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_514_202014-05-20201219": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1612_202027-07-20201778": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2790_202004-12-20204775": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2318_202012-10-20206629": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2202_202023-10-20202156": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2_202007-02-20204122": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_799_202026-05-20203508": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4766_201925-10-20197807": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1797_202014-08-20201307": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1559_202023-07-20201884": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_959_202008-06-20203134": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_776_202016-05-20203569": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2934_202022-03-20213012": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4433_201911-10-20198336": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1871_202003-09-20207587": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3252_201926-07-20193436": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1024_202003-07-2020712": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2927_201923-09-20192574": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3326_201930-07-20193385": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3803_201919-11-20191004": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1302_202016-07-2020457": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__5213_201927-11-20196761": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3927_201906-09-201911193": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_878_202027-05-20203502": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2016_201901-05-20196786": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_729_202015-05-20203573": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_440_202122-02-20211159": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2058_201926-07-2019792": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_595_202003-03-2020225": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1726_202003-10-20202500": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_452_202025-02-20202277": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_120_202030-07-2020157": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_636_202123-02-20214459": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1324_201917-05-20192145": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1950_201901-07-20191539": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_904_202122-03-2021350": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_125_202005-02-20204239": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1007_202102-04-2021126": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__368_202024-01-20204581": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1414_201916-05-20192180": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_860_202108-03-20213757": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_658_202006-03-20201820": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__5417_201907-12-20196215": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4259_201921-01-20201236": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2743_202007-12-20204673": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3468_201918-11-20191029": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1595_202018-01-20211940": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1088_202019-06-2020888": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_45_202108-02-20211479": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1292_202131-03-20212660": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_302_202011-02-20202880": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2437_202010-11-20201836": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2829_202003-02-20215352": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2433_202027-11-20201203": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_590_202122-02-20214518": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3936_201902-12-2019619": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3913_201904-12-2019578": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_181_202012-02-2020644": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1906_202005-10-20202477": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2485_201916-08-2019384": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1380_201909-05-20192380": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1704_202030-09-20202536": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2220_202029-09-20206967": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2544_202003-11-20205540": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2055_202016-09-20207388": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3290_201925-10-20191676": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_336_202020-02-20202413": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1960_201917-07-20191015": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2907_202021-12-20202911": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__329_202023-01-20204617": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1630_202028-07-20201722": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_458_202110-02-20214927": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1753_202012-08-20201416": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_542_202018-06-2020899": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1314_202014-08-202018": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2298_202012-11-20201785": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2400_202007-01-20216291": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2078_201908-05-20196666": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3355_201921-11-2019905": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3496_201908-08-20193047": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1359_201915-05-20192270": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__115_202007-01-20205260": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2896_202017-12-20202971": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2169_202021-09-20207148": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__82_202006-01-20205343": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1328_201902-05-20192510": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2742_202025-11-20204959": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2465_201907-06-20196201": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3281_201911-10-20192088": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1087_202106-04-202173": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1966_201930-08-20193798": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_508_202115-02-20214738": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2484_202027-10-20205756": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__75_202023-01-20201163": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__5020_201915-11-20197142": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4425_201911-10-20198329": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2180_202002-11-20201982": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2698_202022-12-202079": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2251_202030-09-20206912": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__5045_201919-11-20196999": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_589_202027-05-20201118": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1288_201901-05-20192529": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1923_201909-07-20191283": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3991_201914-01-20201370": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2466_202027-10-20205746": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4719_201922-10-20197974": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_580_202003-03-2020224": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3801_201929-08-20192574": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4288_201909-10-20198440": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1447_201921-05-20192076": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_774_202019-05-20203545": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4601_201916-10-20198187": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2021_202015-09-20207510": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2717_202023-11-20205079": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3861_201920-12-201989": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1268_202125-03-20212766": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3565_201907-11-20191353": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_497_202112-02-20214794": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__45_202007-01-20201512": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_794_202027-05-20203473": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__5511_201911-12-20196082": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2233_201920-05-20196429": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1476_202016-09-20202699": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2148_202028-10-20202090": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_178_202011-02-20202836": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3081_201920-07-20193639": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_238_202127-01-20211706": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_398_202105-02-20215177": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__205_202014-01-20205020": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2214_201907-08-2019485": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3366_201931-10-20191588": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2658_201931-10-20191575": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4280_201926-09-20198600": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_177_202012-02-20202786": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__176_202013-01-20205107": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_433_202016-01-20211977": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2168_202021-09-20207147": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1825_202021-09-20202646": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1954_202014-10-20202329": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_843_202106-03-20213838": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1410_202109-04-20212380": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1532_202025-03-20212779": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1341_202004-07-20202484": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3084_201920-07-20193642": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_555_202122-03-2021327": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3849_201930-11-2019644": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_198_202011-02-20202851": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2752_202005-01-20212299": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__5575_201920-12-20194014": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4849_201905-11-20197578": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_961_202015-06-2020947": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_146_202114-01-20216056": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2703_201906-09-20193584": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_656_202124-02-20214368": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4178_201908-01-20201487": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1897_202007-12-20204669": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1972_201909-07-20191285": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_901_202119-03-2021441": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2972_201917-10-20191939": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__5329_201902-12-20196568": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2012_201917-07-20191020": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3832_201927-11-2019765": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2481_202023-11-20201549": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2140_202021-10-20202209": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_638_202019-03-20203": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_324_202020-02-2020431": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1633_202014-08-202028": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__5469_201910-12-20196136": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_165_202001-02-2020987": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_741_202018-05-20203555": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4577_201917-10-20198134": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4170_201925-02-2020357": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1679_202031-07-20201584": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4349_201906-02-2020837": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1140_202009-07-2020588": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1643_201919-06-20191741": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4159_201903-01-20201609": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__418_202028-01-20204454": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1206_202029-06-20202693": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_594_202004-03-20201940": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3957_201929-02-2020247": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_963_202115-03-20213453": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_550_202105-03-2021804": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__1549_201921-06-20191690": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1898_202023-09-20202617": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3926_201906-09-201911192": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_815_202027-05-20203481": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_26_202120-01-20211837": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2569_202027-11-20201216": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1014_202024-06-2020847": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_349_202005-02-20204255": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2656_201918-10-20191898": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_549_202003-03-20202019": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__5602_201921-12-20193956": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1672_202016-09-20202707": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2205_202001-10-20206849": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1110_202018-06-20202896": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1614_202016-09-20202702": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4073_201912-12-2019326": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3672_201924-08-20192744": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_14_202004-03-20201929": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3929_201911-12-2019364": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_258_202122-01-20215655": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1808_201902-07-20191488": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__1566_201921-06-20191694": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_717_202119-03-2021420": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_930_202015-06-2020944": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2359_201903-08-2019602": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__5077_201919-11-20197012": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_823_202115-03-2021602": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1978_202015-09-20207484": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_949_202003-06-20203305": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2288_201924-08-2019164": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_765_202016-05-20203563": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__10_202002-01-20205565": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1759_202027-08-20202818": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_686_202007-03-20201775": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2621_202011-11-20205338": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3080_201910-10-20192116": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2077_202016-09-20207404": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2254_201921-05-20196376": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_958_202005-06-20203204": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_899_202109-03-20213685": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2920_202021-12-20202919": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1237_202124-03-20212835": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_391_202108-02-20215058": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__5027_201916-11-20197090": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1836_201902-08-2019618": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_770_202120-03-2021388": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4915_201913-11-20197265": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_178_201927-06-2019803": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_459_202028-02-20202094": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__359_202024-01-20204572": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_468_202118-02-20211237": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__5453_201907-12-20196234": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_916_202016-07-2020446": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_638_202123-02-20214461": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__5437_201913-01-20205134": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1736_202003-09-20202771": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_930_202002-06-20203329": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2717_201923-09-20192557": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1104_202019-06-20202854": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__211_202014-01-20205025": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_255_202122-01-20215653": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__5342_201904-12-20196456": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4100_201906-12-2019502": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_216_202003-02-2020955": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1909_202003-09-20207605": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_699_202007-03-202086": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__5640_201923-12-20193876": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__1660_201920-06-20191726": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3282_201911-10-20192089": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1356_202102-04-20212579": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1429_201925-05-20191988": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1829_202005-10-20202472": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_347_202105-02-20215166": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__1412_201925-05-20191987": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2471_201929-08-201929": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_447_202019-02-2020475": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1238_202029-06-20202710": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1312_202131-03-20212666": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_872_202109-03-20213672": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3835_201928-11-2019728": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1983_202021-10-20202204": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__417_202028-01-20204453": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4543_201915-10-20198258": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__211_202023-01-20201171": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1291_201917-05-20192144": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2630_201906-09-20193577": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3416_201905-08-20193155": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2826_201910-10-20192108": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2429_202027-10-20205745": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4535_201915-10-20198249": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2434_201908-08-2019470": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3670_201906-11-20191399": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_205_202011-02-20202857": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2778_201912-09-20193450": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_727_202102-03-20214107": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4057_201907-02-2020801": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4842_201905-11-20197572": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1272_202125-03-20212770": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__5451_201907-12-20196232": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2060_201903-05-20196721": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1962_201917-07-20191016": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3118_201917-10-20191953": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4030_201913-09-201911008": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_562_202122-02-20214509": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1963_202015-09-20207477": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1055_202117-03-20213307": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_749_202103-03-20214051": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__5076_201919-11-20197011": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_782_202019-05-20203548": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2329_202002-11-20201990": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4181_201908-01-20201488": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_25_202118-01-20211912": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2069_202013-10-20202363": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_405_202118-02-20211232": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_473_202003-03-2020215": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2033_202019-10-20202226": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1536_202029-07-2020192": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1190_202029-06-20202690": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1774_202014-08-20201301": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__5500_201905-03-20213882": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3809_201923-12-201919": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4474_201911-10-20198362": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2467_201916-08-2019382": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2030_202015-10-20202309": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4937_201902-11-20197682": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3890_201910-12-2019397": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__5321_201930-11-20196617": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1320_202004-07-20202476": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2935_201920-09-20192735": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__5592_201920-12-20194027": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__407_202028-01-20204444": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__94_202020-01-20201255": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1517_202029-09-20202560": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2483_202027-10-20205755": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_413_202020-02-20202437": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1689_202004-08-20201543": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3719_201929-08-20192565": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1044_202102-04-2021130": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__5430_201906-12-20196308": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_19_202003-02-2020933": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3824_201931-08-201911477": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1956_202030-09-20202554": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3407_201903-08-20193201": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2173_201903-08-2019590": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2182_202020-01-20211859": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4337_201913-01-20201437": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__5391_201905-12-20196382": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1861_202016-09-20207384": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2499_201920-08-2019252": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2210_202029-10-20202060": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_900_202119-03-2021440": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2392_201919-08-2019289": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__159_202028-01-20201024": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1332_202006-07-20202411": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__96_202020-01-20201257": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4818_201902-11-20197664": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__5347_201902-12-20196585": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4507_201915-10-20198233": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4675_201921-10-20198039": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_400_202020-02-20202424": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4245_201924-09-20198688": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2619_201906-09-20193573": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2359_202003-11-20201958": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__142_202007-01-20205268": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__284_202027-01-20201076": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2414_202019-10-20205946": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__1874_201901-07-20191535": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_891_202029-05-20203437": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_220_202120-01-20215790": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2267_202001-10-20206856": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1830_202027-08-20207710": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_560_202028-02-2020280": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2586_202007-11-20205429": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__5399_201905-12-20196388": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_966_202101-04-2021152": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_870_202028-05-20203459": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__5243_201927-11-20196782": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_136_202006-02-20204177": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3759_201923-11-2019832": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_49_202107-01-20216281": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1396_201913-05-20192323": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__1863_201926-06-20191618": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2004_202030-09-20202556": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_837_202106-03-20213836": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_308_202015-02-20202607": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2341_201927-05-20196276": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1021_202023-07-2020281": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1192_202122-03-20212999": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_953_202011-06-2020976": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3761_201928-08-20192626": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_833_202106-03-20213833": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1887_202003-09-20207591": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2406_201917-08-2019330": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_202_202120-01-20215773": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1778_202013-08-20201354": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__1326_201908-05-20192409": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4670_201921-10-20198035": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1086_202118-03-20213227": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3868_201906-09-201911170": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1291_202001-10-20202515": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1762_202013-08-20201344": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_722_202013-03-202036": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1437_202015-07-20202152": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1092_202019-06-2020889": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1007_202115-03-20213466": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_393_202011-06-2020967": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_439_202026-02-20202204": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2111_201910-05-20196596": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_838_202030-05-20201080": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2239_202012-11-20201784": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_135_202006-02-20204176": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2774_201916-09-20193236": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2330_202012-10-20206639": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2699_201912-09-20193441": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1551_201921-06-20191692": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2241_202018-11-20201742": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_453_202025-02-20202278": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_195_202020-07-2020372": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_148_202027-02-2020300": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4095_201918-09-20198899": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_469_202026-02-20202207": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2397_202012-11-20201789": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__5607_201921-12-20193957": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3362_201919-10-20191880": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_851_202004-06-20203238": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3283_201911-10-20192090": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1859_202011-01-20216174": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3190_201923-07-20193541": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_828_202106-03-20213828": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1187_202029-06-20202686": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_528_202028-02-20202100": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_183_202103-02-20211585": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2165_201915-05-20196520": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2650_201906-09-20193580": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2428_202021-10-20205896": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2427_202021-10-20205895": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_888_202005-06-20201031": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_414_202102-03-2021914": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_84_202010-02-2020697": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1486_202022-07-2020332": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__306_202023-01-20204616": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_198_202120-01-20215771": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3354_201921-11-2019904": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2881_202016-12-20203041": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__5346_201902-12-20196584": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_569_202003-03-20202031": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2003_201910-07-20191263": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1642_202030-07-20201620": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2737_201923-09-20192559": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3161_201915-10-20192034": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1866_202005-10-20202474": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2124_201913-05-20196564": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2705_202007-01-20212221": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1183_202013-08-202040": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_678_202118-03-2021470": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_342_202017-02-20202568": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1381_202103-04-20212520": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2044_202015-10-20202311": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_763_202131-03-2021167": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2277_202011-11-20201806": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_407_202109-02-20214992": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2021_201911-07-20191229": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2326_202012-10-20206635": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3010_201925-09-20192411": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_257_202007-02-20204137": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4103_201909-12-2019432": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2720_202022-11-20205094": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__5130_201921-11-20196940": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__5177_201927-11-20196759": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_953_202112-03-20213515": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4053_201916-09-20198935": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4323_201909-10-20198443": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_344_202109-02-20211469": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4169_201921-12-201959": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_114_202005-02-20204233": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1456_202109-04-20212391": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4328_201903-01-20201623": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2920_201926-09-20192362": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2755_202015-01-20212022": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_768_202103-03-20214058": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__5037_201918-11-20197042": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1741_201923-07-2019896": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_34_202106-01-20216365": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_158_202118-01-20211932": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1857_201910-07-20191252": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3873_201904-09-201911237": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1672_202030-07-20201637": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4506_201915-10-20198232": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3029_201926-09-20192376": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__5411_201906-12-20196298": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_186_202118-01-20215866": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1887_202001-10-20202519": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2835_201913-09-20193403": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2022_201920-07-2019940": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_27_202106-01-20216358": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__1492_201929-08-201921": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1547_202022-07-20201946": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2807_201916-09-20193244": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2892_201921-09-20192637": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__5600_201921-12-20193954": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4428_201911-10-20198332": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2378_202017-11-20201770": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1371_202010-07-2020577": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_95_202127-01-20211698": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1981_202005-11-20201917": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2443_202022-10-20205836": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2410_202011-11-20201814": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1386_202010-07-20202268": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1782_202019-09-20202650": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3858_201902-12-2019618": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__5124_201921-11-20196934": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3008_201925-10-20191665": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__201_202014-01-20205017": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4334_201918-10-20198089": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_295_202018-01-20211934": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3994_201913-03-202019": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3998_201905-12-2019540": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_978_202115-03-20213458": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_420_202108-02-20215067": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__1785_201902-05-20196751": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__68_202004-01-20205416": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_182_202116-01-20215942": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_638_202006-03-20201806": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__5276_201928-11-20196698": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__52_202003-01-20205491": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2582_202020-01-20215796": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3342_201906-11-20191379": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3488_201905-11-20191447": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2225_202028-10-20202092": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2191_202028-09-20207021": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_607_202022-01-20211774": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3220_201923-07-20193559": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1473_202023-07-20201870": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4813_201902-11-20197660": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_894_202109-03-20213682": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_446_202122-02-20211161": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4104_201903-02-2020923": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_477_202026-02-20202212": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3102_201922-10-20191788": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2820_201904-09-20193662": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_117_202003-11-2020660": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__80_202014-01-20201363": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_415_202020-02-20202439": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4434_201909-10-20198510": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__31_202002-01-20205581": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3826_201902-12-2019617": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1943_201911-07-20191226": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_428_202111-02-20211411": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__284_202021-01-20204808": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1135_202120-03-20213058": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_834_202106-03-20213834": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__118_202022-01-20201206": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2346_202002-11-20201992": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_343_202103-02-20215340": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3420_201922-11-2019856": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2773_201906-09-20193587": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3739_201927-08-20192711": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_697_202013-03-20201695": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__86_202006-01-20205347": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_200_202015-02-2020544": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_762_202103-03-20214053": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1360_202106-04-20212445": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_342_202103-02-20215339": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2128_202018-09-20207253": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2108_202013-10-20202371": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1734_202003-09-20202769": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4086_201918-09-20198896": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2651_201925-09-20192403": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1843_202023-10-20202142": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__1523_201927-05-20191957": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1201_202122-03-20213003": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3449_201902-11-20191529": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4183_201923-12-201926": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3886_201904-09-201911246": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_172_202129-01-20211655": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__1329_201903-06-20191847": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2764_201918-09-20192893": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__178_202013-01-20205109": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_665_202015-05-20201205": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2152_202013-10-20202377": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2840_202005-12-20204712": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1236_202014-07-2020517": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2222_201905-08-2019557": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_105_202001-02-20204396": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_847_202106-03-20213840": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1018_202023-06-2020862": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__136_202008-01-20205205": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_132_202120-01-20211850": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1808_202021-09-20202642": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3639_201914-11-20191201": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_722_202102-03-20214105": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3317_201931-10-20191582": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_213_202003-02-2020952": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__5561_201919-12-20194050": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2912_201924-09-20192444": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2480_202028-10-20205706": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_837_202117-03-2021519": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1508_202020-07-20202031": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__402_202028-01-20204440": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4939_201902-11-20197684": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1573_202023-07-20201890": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2268_201921-05-20196383": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_200_202118-01-20215873": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_23_202111-01-20212121": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1308_202008-01-20212173": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__48_202003-01-20205488": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_810_202027-05-20201130": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4949_201913-11-20197270": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_506_202007-03-202074": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__118_202006-01-20205354": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_33_202001-02-20204361": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_54_202114-01-20212040": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1853_202023-09-20202609": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1624_202027-07-20201780": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2715_202017-12-2020266": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_448_202110-02-20214922": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_839_202026-05-20203519": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_612_202122-02-20214532": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2265_201913-08-2019425": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_13_202007-02-20204123": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2770_202006-01-20212276": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_166_201903-06-2019833": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_125_202027-01-20211699": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4403_201909-10-20198495": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__5526_201906-01-20205361": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4243_201924-09-20198686": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__62_202004-01-20205411": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4193_201920-12-2019106": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_441_202112-02-20214787": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__20_202003-01-20201595": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_570_202003-03-20202032": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2401_202006-11-20201905": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4840_201906-11-20197504": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4089_201911-12-2019376": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2290_201922-05-20196347": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__255_202023-01-20201174": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2203_201916-08-2019365": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_889_202109-03-20213677": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2403_202011-11-20201810": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2188_201916-05-20196494": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_867_202005-06-20201029": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1469_202109-04-20212396": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__5099_201920-11-20196968": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_58_202107-01-20216285": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_865_202028-05-20203455": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1814_202008-10-20202427": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2427_202011-11-20201815": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_720_202102-03-20214103": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_579_202012-06-2020957": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1768_202013-08-20201349": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2980_201926-10-20191610": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1914_202030-09-20202552": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4261_201925-09-20198647": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__191_202013-01-20205121": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2693_202022-12-202076": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2722_202024-11-20205007": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2209_201916-08-2019366": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2151_202019-09-20207195": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_35_202106-01-20216366": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2655_202020-11-20205125": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2747_202016-01-20211983": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4226_201903-01-20201615": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1683_202017-09-20202682": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3349_201931-10-20191586": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3374_201902-11-20191523": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_516_202105-03-2021799": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_785_202105-03-20213912": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_981_202125-03-2021226": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_746_202021-05-20201151": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1603_202126-04-20214": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1571_202022-07-20201953": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2321_202012-10-20206632": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3238_201925-07-20193486": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_194_202127-01-20211705": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_288_202127-01-20215504": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2659_201924-10-20191714": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2229_202022-10-20202196": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1610_202027-07-20201776": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2002_202030-09-20202555": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2402_201903-08-2019604": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_481_202111-02-20214859": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2803_202002-12-20204852": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2858_201926-09-20192358": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4435_201909-10-20198511": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1979_202013-10-20202357": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1888_202012-10-20202391": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_156_202007-02-20204129": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2486_201916-08-2019385": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1849_202018-09-20202672": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_657_202005-03-20201908": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4003_201912-09-201911050": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_43_202001-02-20204369": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2519_202023-11-20201555": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2038_201902-05-20196765": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1269_202002-07-2020740": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_738_202102-03-20214116": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3208_201909-10-20192167": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1487_202017-07-20202070": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4608_201911-10-20198377": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1365_202009-07-20202341": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_177_202118-01-20215860": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2536_202027-11-20201214": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2379_202011-11-20201809": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_545_202117-02-20214708": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3793_201929-08-20192568": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_858_202029-05-20201100": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2408_202011-11-20201812": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_756_202018-06-2020902": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3721_201927-08-20192699": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__246_202007-01-20205275": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2919_201901-08-20193304": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_984_202131-03-2021176": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2593_201930-08-20193806": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4964_201913-11-20197277": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4296_201926-09-20198611": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2489_202028-10-20205711": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__84_202006-01-20205345": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2115_202017-09-20207343": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3792_201904-12-2019575": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4817_201902-11-20197663": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2785_202027-11-20204914": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2416_201908-08-2019469": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2611_202010-11-20205388": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__5278_201928-11-20196699": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_255_202129-01-20211665": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4570_201917-10-20198130": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2684_202023-11-20205069": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_790_202019-05-20203550": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3624_201913-11-20191253": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1459_202023-07-2020294": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1196_202026-06-20202738": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_809_202027-05-20203475": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2317_201928-08-201971": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4157_201916-12-2019172": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4276_201923-01-20201183": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_701_202124-03-2021252": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_893_202006-06-20201018": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__396_202028-01-20204434": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1389_202009-02-20211473": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3236_201902-11-20191507": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1484_201925-05-20191991": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__5224_201927-11-20196767": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_398_202023-07-2020280": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_726_202017-03-202010": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2331_201925-05-20196290": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1059_202117-03-20213311": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__5400_201905-12-20196389": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__886_201921-06-20191686": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1254_201909-05-20192375": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2013_202021-11-20201618": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2459_202011-11-20201817": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2863_201906-09-20193591": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1419_202106-04-20212460": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_31_202014-02-2020562": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_147_202006-02-20204182": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1944_202013-10-20202350": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4422_201910-10-20198408": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4135_201923-12-201924": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_54_202014-02-2020565": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_274_202125-01-20215585": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_268_202013-02-2020608": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_781_202122-03-2021336": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2965_202006-01-20216386": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_159_202007-02-20204131": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4362_201909-10-20198462": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_215_202104-02-20211551": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2706_202023-11-20205075": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_348_202003-02-20204352": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1884_202023-09-20202614": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_643_202118-03-2021468": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4032_201913-09-201911010": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2409_202011-11-20201813": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_599_202005-03-20201890": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3388_201928-11-2019716": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1468_201915-05-20192272": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2866_202014-01-20216061": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2995_201909-10-20192152": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2064_202028-09-20207019": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1449_202016-07-20202124": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2628_202012-11-20205273": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4557_201916-10-20198181": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__363_202024-01-20204576": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3164_201923-07-20193538": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2544_201915-06-20196161": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2696_202021-12-2020129": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4760_201918-11-20197038": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_837_202021-05-20201159": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2583_201906-09-20193568": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4588_201916-10-20198184": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2646_202012-11-20205282": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_126_202022-01-20211760": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_446_202008-07-2020616": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_77_202003-02-20204341": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1427_202106-04-20212466": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2384_202019-10-20205939": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_98_202105-02-20211519": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2236_202028-10-20202096": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2382_201901-06-20196240": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2660_202002-12-20204839": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_634_202123-02-20214457": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1748_201901-07-20191521": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_647_202006-03-20201812": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3083_201926-10-20191615": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3749_201927-08-20192716": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1046_202015-06-20202963": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3923_201906-09-201911190": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__5087_201920-11-20196956": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_445_202025-02-20202271": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1313_201908-05-20192407": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_538_202117-02-20214703": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_49_202011-02-2020674": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_289_202014-02-20202650": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3491_201914-11-20191190": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1601_202007-08-202097": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3645_201906-12-2019480": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2201_202014-10-20202343": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__187_202013-01-20205117": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4478_201911-10-20198365": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__370_202024-01-20204583": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2573_201902-09-20193735": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2915_202021-12-20202917": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__5052_201918-11-20197050": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1190_202014-07-2020510": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4771_201925-10-20197811": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4544_201915-10-20198259": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1774_202022-09-20202630": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2854_202017-12-20202964": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_105_202112-01-20216120": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1065_202117-03-20213314": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_145_202001-02-2020986": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_71_202105-04-202166": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_303_202129-01-20215426": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__5145_201922-11-20196888": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1318_201913-05-20192319": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_658_202005-03-2020149": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2788_202027-11-20204917": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2014_202021-11-20201619": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4134_201921-12-201952": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1327_202014-07-2020527": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1362_202102-04-20212580": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_858_202102-04-2021111": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2987_201922-10-20197958": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1680_202012-08-20201397": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4784_201926-10-20197758": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_216_202101-03-2021941": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3369_201902-08-20193253": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__5402_201905-12-20196391": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2390_201927-08-2019125": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2817_201908-07-20195916": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_567_202024-07-2020257": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_607_202122-02-20214530": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3588_201919-08-20192855": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__5482_201910-12-20196146": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1041_202011-06-20203033": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2848_202007-12-20204677": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1865_202027-08-20207730": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__1701_201903-07-20191431": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4469_201921-10-20198022": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_116_202112-01-20216125": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2089_202010-11-20201826": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1710_201903-07-20191432": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__5632_201923-12-20193868": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1847_202024-08-20201239": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3595_201916-11-20191088": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__5216_201927-11-20196763": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_216_201909-08-201985": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__331_202023-01-20204619": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3658_201927-08-20192690": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1070_202016-06-20202935": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1427_201917-05-20192149": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1515_202109-04-20212416": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_430_202112-02-20211365": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_769_202103-03-20214060": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__5005_201916-11-20197087": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2254_201901-08-2019676": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1021_202116-03-20213390": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_784_202020-05-20203533": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2229_202030-09-20206902": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__218_202014-01-20205027": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3383_201925-10-20191688": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2208_202029-10-20202058": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__5215_201929-11-20196643": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2270_202027-10-20202133": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2194_202023-09-20207059": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3670_201924-08-20192742": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2892_202016-12-20203052": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2495_202004-12-2020902": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1628_202014-08-202027": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1114_202002-07-2020732": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1222_202022-07-20201935": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1730_202012-08-20201401": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_478_202111-02-20214858": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2196_202028-09-20207022": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_309_202129-01-20215432": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_957_202005-06-20203203": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3660_201916-11-20191094": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_120_202118-01-20211929": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_836_202116-03-2021552": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_667_202131-03-2021165": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_159_202115-02-20211312": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_668_202120-03-2021381": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_563_202003-03-20202027": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__49_202003-01-20205489": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3838_201926-11-2019800": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1507_201928-05-20191929": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2280_202003-10-20206811": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4701_201921-10-20198060": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__219_202023-01-20201172": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__5292_201929-11-20196652": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_287_202127-01-20215503": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1877_202003-09-20207589": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1399_202106-04-20212451": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2274_201920-07-2019955": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1016_202010-06-20203061": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__1230_201903-05-20192477": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2975_202027-01-20215521": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2193_201924-09-20192436": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_291_202127-01-20215507": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__5639_201923-12-20193875": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1343_202102-04-20212568": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2107_201910-05-20196593": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_48_202001-06-2020320": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3855_201921-12-201946": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2806_201912-09-20193453": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1334_202008-07-2020631": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_773_202104-03-20213974": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1790_202003-09-20202779": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__1099_201901-06-20191867": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_341_202028-02-2020268": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2207_202028-09-20207025": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3720_201927-08-20192698": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4112_201903-01-20201608": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1440_202014-07-20202214": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3730_201927-08-20192705": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_499_202122-02-20211164": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1121_202118-03-20213235": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1855_202028-09-20202583": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1685_202031-07-20201588": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2730_201909-10-20192145": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__430_202028-01-20204455": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1545_202010-03-20213598": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4260_201911-02-2020663": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_682_202115-03-2021582": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__15_202002-01-20205568": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_95_202111-01-20216166": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__824_201916-05-20192175": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_871_202124-03-2021262": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_822_202027-05-20203482": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__5398_201905-12-20196387": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_254_202013-02-20202720": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1360_202008-07-20202386": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__5078_201919-11-20197013": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2018_202014-10-20202335": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3026_201913-01-20201425": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2816_201902-07-20196072": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_758_202126-03-2021188": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_591_202002-06-20201049": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_79_202019-02-2020453": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1116_202119-03-20213134": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1138_202023-06-20202818": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1028_202016-06-2020938": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__1073_201902-07-20191468": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__5634_201923-12-20193870": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2413_202020-11-20201691": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2280_201903-08-2019599": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1450_202109-04-20212390": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_364_202104-02-20215233": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_890_202006-06-20201016": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2008_202010-11-20201825": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2647_202012-11-20205283": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2767_201901-07-20196099": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__5095_201920-11-20196964": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_368_202105-02-20215168": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__5392_201905-12-20196383": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_356_202108-02-20215055": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3273_201926-07-20193444": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_363_202024-02-2020394": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2063_202018-09-20207251": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1934_202003-09-20207618": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3627_201914-11-20191196": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2796_201923-09-20192565": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1912_202003-09-20207606": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2030_201908-05-20196661": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__179_202027-01-20201073": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_979_202116-03-20213366": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1070_202118-03-20213216": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1451_202029-07-2020185": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_850_202026-05-20201145": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2993_201918-10-20191903": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__17_202002-01-20205570": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_329_202103-02-20215330": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2278_202029-10-20202070": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4477_201911-10-20198364": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_92_202111-01-20216163": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1344_202102-04-20212569": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_570_202118-02-20214631": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_175_202011-02-2020677": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4021_201916-12-2019167": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2360_202003-11-20201959": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1845_202027-08-20207719": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3359_201901-08-20193326": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_502_202117-02-20214693": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1853_201903-07-20191447": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_580_202003-03-20202040": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2226_202030-09-20206900": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2015_202015-09-20207508": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__5288_201929-11-20196648": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2561_201905-09-20193612": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3270_201926-07-20193442": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__5265_201927-11-20196801": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1154_202009-07-2020591": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_397_202101-03-2021944": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2047_201925-07-2019838": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2607_201904-09-20193652": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_531_202117-02-20214699": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_708_202115-03-2021588": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_890_202109-03-20213678": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3578_201918-11-20191032": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1082_202118-03-20213224": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1013_202011-06-20203021": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__355_202023-01-20204641": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_615_202115-03-2021579": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2462_201907-06-20196199": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2412_201917-08-2019331": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1872_201908-07-20191319": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1304_202015-07-2020483": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_767_202016-05-20203565": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3850_201930-11-2019645": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_371_202005-03-20201888": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_687_202125-02-20214308": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1234_202029-06-20202706": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__83_202006-01-20205344": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_395_202104-02-20215247": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2136_201910-02-20214890": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_439_202106-03-2021759": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2320_202028-10-20202101": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3070_201920-07-20193631": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_252_202011-02-20202876": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1156_202120-03-20213065": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1943_202003-09-20207625": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2509_202024-11-20201450": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_235_202012-02-20202800": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1832_201905-08-2019551": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2454_202005-11-20205497": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2468_201927-08-2019129": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3069_201920-07-20193630": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1961_202005-10-20202481": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1897_202023-09-20202616": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1247_202029-06-20202718": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2444_201930-08-20193801": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2738_202025-11-20204955": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3779_201906-12-2019482": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2470_201917-08-2019334": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1965_201905-07-20191368": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2348_202013-10-20206584": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3984_201904-12-2019590": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1441_202028-07-2020215": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_420_202025-02-20202269": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1256_202106-04-20212443": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_357_202122-02-20211150": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_524_202118-02-20214620": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_124_202114-01-20216048": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2529_202007-12-20204671": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1876_202003-09-20207588": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1546_202024-07-20201806": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2625_202012-11-20205270": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_299_202124-02-20211080": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__188_202013-01-20205118": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_852_202028-05-20203450": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2399_201901-06-20196244": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__345_202023-01-20204632": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1158_202026-06-2020813": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__270_202020-01-20204851": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2802_202002-12-20204851": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2319_202012-10-20206630": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_329_202021-01-20211813": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_635_202123-02-20214458": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2887_201912-09-20193457": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_826_202020-05-20201167": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_31_202008-02-20215053": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2433_202023-10-20205793": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_646_202015-05-20201203": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1669_202030-07-20201635": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3647_201927-11-2019759": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2285_201902-08-2019632": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2131_201914-05-20196539": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2600_202016-12-2020325": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2047_202016-10-20202290": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_424_202108-02-20215069": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3363_201902-11-20191519": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4839_201905-11-20197570": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_571_202118-02-20214632": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1170_202024-06-20202792": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3616_201919-08-20192873": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_513_202014-05-20201218": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_357_202013-02-20202734": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_63_202001-02-20204388": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1172_202124-03-20212827": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1052_202117-03-20213304": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3769_201929-11-2019679": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__225_202014-01-20205032": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2768_201931-08-20193775": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_706_202007-03-202088": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2728_202024-11-20205013": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_55_202120-01-20211838": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3796_201929-08-20192571": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1293_202004-07-20202468": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__1909_201901-07-20191537": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1684_202003-10-20202499": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1655_201920-06-20191724": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_488_202111-02-20214863": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4780_201926-10-20197754": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1345_202003-07-20202509": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1998_202015-09-20207498": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2070_202016-09-20207398": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3784_201914-01-20201369": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1054_202016-06-20202932": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__207_202014-01-20205021": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4935_201902-11-20197681": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3684_201919-11-2019993": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4897_201907-11-20197448": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__300_202022-01-20204731": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4516_201916-10-20198174": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_131_202122-01-20211761": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2590_201917-09-20192937": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2482_202027-10-20205754": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2641_201907-09-20193519": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_620_202122-02-20214540": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__109_202007-01-20205254": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2071_201916-09-20193224": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_375_202019-02-20202504": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_234_202015-02-20202604": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4311_201920-01-20201273": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_235_202121-01-20215706": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_617_202021-05-20201150": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_815_202015-06-2020941": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_925_202018-01-20211937": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3400_201921-10-20191863": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2680_201904-09-20193656": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_961_202005-06-20203206": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_126_202116-01-20211975": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__5230_201927-11-20196772": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3184_201921-10-20191849": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__5074_201919-11-20197010": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_921_202110-03-20213587": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2280_202025-11-20201362": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1183_202029-06-20202685": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1176_201910-05-20192344": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3927_201923-11-2019839": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1295_202016-09-20202698": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__1517_201925-05-20191997": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4662_201911-11-20197359": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2404_202016-10-20206462": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4843_201905-11-20197573": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_935_202110-03-20213596": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1899_201903-07-20191449": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1883_202022-09-20207098": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2343_202007-11-20201867": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1476_201926-06-20191599": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_359_202118-02-20211229": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_753_202001-06-20201063": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2683_202027-11-20204884": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_382_202104-02-20215244": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3273_201913-11-20191237": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__5407_201905-12-20196392": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_988_202125-03-2021227": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4297_201914-02-2020556": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1705_201901-07-20191516": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_980_202023-06-2020861": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4054_201916-12-2019169": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_603_202004-02-20215249": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1057_202117-03-20213309": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1559_201903-06-20191850": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1235_202003-07-2020716": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_75_202111-01-20212123": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1062_202103-04-202193": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_263_202125-01-20215580": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2918_201926-09-20192360": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1761_201908-07-20191315": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4146_201910-12-2019414": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_917_202110-03-20213583": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1467_201927-06-20191563": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_802_202105-03-20213914": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1109_202008-07-2020621": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2971_201902-11-20191503": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4493_201911-10-20198371": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1638_202030-07-20201619": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2662_201916-09-20193232": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_880_202027-05-20203504": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4368_201909-10-20198468": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4133_201921-12-201951": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2800_201902-07-20196058": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3700_201919-11-2019996": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1834_202003-09-20207582": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__5029_201919-11-20196997": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1743_202012-08-20201408": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__5089_201920-11-20196958": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1747_202014-08-20201299": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1659_202007-08-202099": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2308_202012-10-20206626": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__247_202018-01-20204909": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3159_201907-11-20191341": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__170_202014-01-20205013": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1932_202018-09-20207248": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2563_202006-11-20205474": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4066_201916-09-20198944": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2071_202018-09-20207252": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_537_202118-02-20214622": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_553_202003-03-20202020": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__21_202002-01-20205573": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_981_202115-03-20213460": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2403_202016-10-20206461": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4427_201911-10-20198331": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1398_202103-04-20212526": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2968_202022-02-20214546": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1989_202012-10-20202396": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1303_202131-03-20212662": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3761_201921-11-2019921": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1164_202029-06-2020794": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_153_202026-02-2020336": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_133_202006-02-20204174": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1868_202024-09-20202590": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1079_202018-06-20202885": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2953_202022-12-20202885": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2276_201902-08-2019630": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4589_201917-10-20198141": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__333_202023-01-20204621": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2922_202016-01-20215943": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1277_202004-07-2020697": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4127_201907-01-20201521": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_74_202003-02-20204339": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1342_202101-04-20212622": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2557_201902-09-20193731": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3098_201910-10-20192118": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2846_201920-09-20192729": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3599_201919-08-20192864": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_596_202006-03-2020109": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3138_201907-11-20191340": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1324_202008-07-20202379": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1210_202122-03-20213008": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2136_202021-09-20207144": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__5186_201919-11-20197019": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_207_202011-02-20202859": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_512_202025-02-2020371": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2457_202018-11-20201757": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2103_202028-10-20202087": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4321_201914-02-2020557": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2249_202030-09-20206910": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_803_202021-05-20203525": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_474_202026-02-20202209": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3132_201907-11-20191339": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3899_201926-11-2019804": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_145_202114-01-20216055": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3207_201925-07-20193481": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3925_201902-01-20201641": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1311_202131-03-20212665": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__81_202006-01-20205342": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4703_201921-10-20198062": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1420_202005-08-2020117": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2922_201910-07-20195849": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__1337_201917-05-20192146": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1763_202013-08-20201345": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1022_202011-06-20203026": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3582_201917-08-20192917": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2544_202007-12-2020742": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_128_202003-02-2020943": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4266_201925-09-20198648": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4207_201914-01-20201377": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_153_202115-01-20215990": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2397_201901-06-20196243": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3316_201926-10-20191628": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3675_201928-08-20192611": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__7_202022-01-20201200": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_209_202120-01-20215780": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2315_202005-11-20201924": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_73_202111-01-20216159": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1394_201904-05-20192459": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2564_201929-08-201936": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2292_201901-08-2019681": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1820_202027-08-20207704": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2514_201919-08-2019299": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4923_201911-11-20197366": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3301_201902-11-20191510": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__148_202020-01-20201262": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4353_201909-10-20198454": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4179_201921-09-20198778": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_44_202107-01-20216278": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2676_202017-12-2020263": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2197_202023-09-20207060": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_574_202004-03-20201936": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__240_202022-01-20201215": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_431_202110-02-20214917": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1239_202124-03-20212836": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1424_202014-07-20202207": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_622_202122-02-20214542": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3109_201924-10-20191720": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3605_201919-08-20192870": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2031_202022-10-20202178": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_100_202003-02-20204349": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_422_202017-02-2020520": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1701_202013-10-20202347": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_827_202021-05-20201157": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__5611_201921-12-20193961": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4254_201924-01-20201135": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4711_201924-10-20197862": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2411_202023-11-20201540": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4806_201906-04-20212436": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_346_202003-02-20204351": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2146_201917-08-2019325": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_606_202108-03-2021729": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2447_202018-11-20201756": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3954_201928-11-2019737": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1611_201914-06-20191776": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1393_202009-07-20202347": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3981_201910-12-2019405": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2472_202027-10-20205749": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_193_202118-01-20215869": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_938_202102-04-2021115": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_773_202016-05-20203568": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4331_201928-01-20201036": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_764_202122-03-2021333": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1405_201903-05-20192486": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1935_202023-11-20205062": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_87_202125-02-20211032": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1384_202024-07-2020261": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3882_201920-02-2020413": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_399_202027-02-20202141": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2157_202019-09-20207196": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__5374_201904-12-20196470": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1703_202006-08-20201510": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1468_202020-07-2020399": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3853_201903-09-201911325": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3022_201911-10-20192072": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2154_201917-08-2019327": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2294_201927-08-2019121": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__5353_201904-12-20196458": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_321_202015-02-20202618": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_507_202115-02-20214737": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4063_201916-09-20198941": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4025_201927-01-20211693": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1674_202012-08-202076": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2913_201909-07-20195888": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_892_202029-05-20203438": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2199_201912-09-20193432": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_912_202112-03-20213501": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_72_202120-01-20211839": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1778_202015-09-20202744": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2300_202028-10-20202100": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3734_201927-08-20192707": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__5446_201907-12-20196227": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_614_202004-03-20201953": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3790_201903-09-201911323": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1617_202013-08-202052": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_87_202004-02-20204268": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_55_202107-01-20216282": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1280_202030-06-20202659": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3975_201912-09-201911037": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1931_202003-09-20207617": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__5254_201927-11-20196790": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1947_202028-09-20207018": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1819_202005-10-20202471": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4515_201915-10-20198239": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_185_202012-02-20202787": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2601_202012-11-20205265": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1313_202022-07-2020316": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2910_202021-12-20202914": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1425_202017-07-20202059": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_943_202025-06-2020822": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4097_201918-09-20198901": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4463_201911-10-20198354": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3337_201901-08-20193307": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_98_202003-02-20204348": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1284_201902-05-20192508": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2495_201928-08-201985": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3023_201919-09-20192817": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__253_202020-01-20204841": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_973_202011-06-20203014": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1126_202004-07-2020689": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_505_202005-02-20211534": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__1327_201902-05-20192509": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__5299_201929-11-20196659": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2838_201911-10-20192065": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2128_202002-11-20201978": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1497_202019-08-20208": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1699_202006-08-20201508": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1883_202018-09-20202673": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__132_202008-01-20205201": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2145_201820-06-20196137": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1081_202109-04-202139": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2094_202016-09-20207417": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_98_202111-01-20216168": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__5429_201906-12-20196307": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1089_202018-06-20202889": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__404_202028-01-20204442": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__258_202023-01-20201177": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2355_201927-05-20196282": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4575_201917-10-20198132": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3231_201917-10-20191959": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2449_201907-06-20196194": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2482_201916-08-2019383": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4154_201921-12-201955": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__1723_201922-06-20191679": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__234_202022-01-20201212": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_669_202117-03-2021508": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4612_201911-10-20198380": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_49_202003-06-2020319": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4061_201916-09-20198939": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__5327_201902-12-20196567": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2796_201902-07-20196055": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1597_202014-09-20202753": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1758_202013-08-20201343": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_499_202111-02-20214867": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2189_202021-10-20202211": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3801_201930-11-2019642": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_167_202116-01-20215937": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_361_202104-03-2021840": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1804_202019-08-20201262": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4314_201909-10-20198441": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_804_202115-03-2021591": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4310_201914-01-20201381": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3486_201926-09-20198593": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1796_202027-01-20215513": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1297_202007-07-2020643": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_603_202126-02-2021994": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_543_202122-02-20214506": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2439_201902-09-20193723": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_431_202123-02-20211115": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__1747_201908-07-20191314": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4039_201910-12-2019409": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3082_201920-07-20193640": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__73_202023-01-20201161": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_934_202001-06-20203372": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1373_202008-07-20202389": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_623_202116-03-2021545": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_223_202121-01-20215700": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2178_202016-10-20202294": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_713_202106-03-2021773": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1919_202003-09-20207610": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_288_201907-11-2019631": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2362_202014-10-20206514": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__1682_201920-06-20191730": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4120_201923-12-201923": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_707_202007-03-202089": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4485_201911-10-20198368": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1629_202028-07-20201721": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_27_202108-02-2021408": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2619_201919-06-20196142": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_411_202105-02-20215182": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2631_201906-09-20193578": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3403_201931-10-20191590": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_224_201927-08-201951": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__249_202018-01-20204911": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_132_202006-02-2020860": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2850_202016-12-20203024": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2250_201926-07-2019803": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_704_202013-03-20201700": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__5479_201910-12-20196143": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3128_201916-10-20191996": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3818_201905-12-2019523": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4148_201910-12-2019415": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1506_202020-07-20202030": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_544_202117-02-20214707": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1414_202020-07-2020395": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_114_202112-01-20216123": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3454_201906-08-20193114": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2612_202012-11-20205266": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__172_202013-01-20205103": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2675_202025-01-20215590": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2060_202019-09-20207188": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2216_202029-09-20206964": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2054_201923-07-2019898": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__1991_201917-07-20191019": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__5435_201907-12-20196220": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__5171_201913-11-20197292": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_991_202018-06-2020910": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2712_201920-09-20192723": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1564_202007-08-202093": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_510_202003-03-2020218": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__119_202006-01-20205355": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1408_202106-04-20212454": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__38_202003-01-20205478": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_387_202020-02-20202415": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2760_202027-11-20204893": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_986_202125-03-20212757": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2310_201913-08-2019426": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2049_202012-10-20202398": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__3819_201907-02-2020799": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1029_202025-06-2020829": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__2864_201906-09-20193592": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__392_202027-01-20204527": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_894_202012-06-2020961": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_399_202020-02-2020435": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1754_202018-09-20202665": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__5621_201921-12-20193966": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1306_202021-07-2020350": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__2377_201906-08-2019534": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__5_202014-01-20205009": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1294_202002-07-20202566": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_846_202106-03-20213839": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__5438_201907-12-20196221": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__5090_201920-11-20196959": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_905_202110-03-20213576": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_381_202108-02-20211490": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_631_202101-03-20214162": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_352_202006-02-20204189": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1543_202022-07-20201945": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3377_201902-11-20191525": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_158_202115-01-20215994": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1029_202117-03-20213290": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2258_202022-10-20202198": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__3197_201924-10-20191727": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_985_202115-03-20213462": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__1264_201920-06-20191715": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_950_202123-03-2021300": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_933_202125-03-20212756": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1347_202102-04-20212572": "GRANTED", + "Bail Appn__4566_201917-10-20198126": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__4664_201921-10-20198030": "DENIED", + "Bail Appn__5502_201912-12-20195993": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2243_202030-09-20206907": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_345_202103-02-20215342": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1928_202003-09-20207615": "DENIED", + "bailapplication_1308_201919-08-2019135": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_295_202106-02-20211153": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_656_202109-03-2021577": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_720_202117-03-2021483": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1186_202006-10-20201217": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_711_202101-04-2021190": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1482_202017-11-2020719": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1127_202007-10-20201195": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_287_202030-05-2020409": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_765_202103-04-2021136": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_59_202116-01-20211467": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_413_202124-03-2021254": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1838_202009-11-20201973": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_44_202122-01-20211377": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_332_202109-02-20211108": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_304_202001-06-2020401": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1377_202028-10-20201045": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_1626_201903-10-20191357": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_485_202008-06-2020355": "DENIED", + "bailapplication_1523_201928-08-201915": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_547_202126-02-2021810": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1393_202006-11-2020873": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_2193_201926-10-2019939": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1135_202001-10-20201246": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_1197_201925-07-2019384": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1026_202002-09-20201475": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_212_201904-09-2019470": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_2008_201918-10-20191113": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1398_202005-11-2020914": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_1907_201925-10-2019951": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1265_202009-10-20201189": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1123_202022-09-20201300": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_645_202126-03-2021227": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_324_202109-02-20211103": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_979_202119-03-20211828": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_323_202103-02-20212526": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1601_202005-12-2020480": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1565_202004-12-2020490": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_958_202027-08-20201519": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1575_202010-09-20202231": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1007_202009-09-20201373": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_186_202129-01-20211309": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_162_202019-02-2020275": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_1554_201916-09-20191589": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_303_202026-05-2020457": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_754_202107-04-202145": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_1681_201918-10-20191103": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_210_202110-02-20211079": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_750_202005-01-20211592": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_2335_201906-12-2019396": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_779_202103-04-2021137": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1221_202014-10-20201159": "DENIED", + "bailapplication_1560_201909-10-20191282": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_2160_201931-10-2019920": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1475_202006-11-2020884": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_46_202118-01-20211435": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_351_202110-02-20211083": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_784_202023-07-202092": "DENIED", + "bailapplication_82_202020-01-2020804": "DENIED", + "bailapplication_2459_201917-01-2020842": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1376_202013-11-2020733": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_1583_201905-09-20191730": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_372_202126-02-2021805": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_2225_201915-11-2019737": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_2532_201906-01-2020986": "DENIED", + "bailapplication_2380_201906-12-2019401": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_175_202010-02-2020425": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1483_202017-11-2020720": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_225_201918-09-2019437": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1343_202022-10-20201085": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_222_202111-02-20211053": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1651_202016-12-2020183": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_598_202011-06-2020332": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1585_202010-12-2020437": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_70_202119-01-20211415": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_587_202103-03-2021721": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_9_202112-01-20211494": "DENIED", + "bailapplication_2546_201904-01-20201011": "DENIED", + "bailapplication_1366_201927-09-20191436": "DENIED", + "bailapplication_1828_201930-09-20191418": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_561_202002-07-2020219": "DENIED", + "bailapplication_2552_201910-01-2020916": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_1874_201918-12-201976": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_166_202127-01-20211357": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_674_202106-04-202179": "DENIED", + "bailapplication_2167_201920-11-2019645": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_881_202019-08-202043": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1502_202024-11-2020607": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_464_202123-02-2021879": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_829_202003-09-20201436": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1070_202002-12-2020506": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_351_202104-02-20212501": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1198_202107-04-20211655": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1461_202002-12-2020508": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_42_202007-02-2020533": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_827_202025-09-20201257": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_936_202027-08-20201516": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_340_202124-02-2021844": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1413_202009-11-2020823": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_293_202005-03-202089": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1198_202020-10-20201110": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_322_202111-02-20211060": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_2544_201907-01-2020957": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_194_202105-02-20211174": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_795_202124-03-2021273": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1045_202006-10-20201211": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1076_202013-10-20201171": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1216_202028-10-20201033": "DENIED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_2_202002-01-2020253": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1020_202009-09-20201374": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1685_202023-12-202015": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1497_202019-11-2020687": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1686_202008-01-20211524": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1042_202022-09-20201294": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_154_202110-02-20211073": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_996_202028-10-20201029": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_375_202112-02-20211033": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_2192_201926-10-2019938": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_2394_201903-01-20201023": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_803_202018-08-202051": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1218_202007-10-20201204": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_955_202024-08-202013": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_407_202109-02-20212408": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_1625_201904-09-20191758": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_878_202107-04-202155": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_535_202109-03-2021572": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_245_202112-02-20211028": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_96_202004-03-2020110": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_132_202122-01-20211380": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_30_202107-01-20211544": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_363_202003-03-2020137": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_716_202101-03-20212106": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_342_202102-03-2021747": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_524_202025-06-2020267": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1047_202005-10-20201227": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_530_202106-03-2021653": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_1894_201911-10-20191236": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1409_202027-11-2020523": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1579_202005-12-2020476": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1476_202026-11-2020575": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_364_202118-03-2021412": "DENIED", + "bailapplication_2186_201928-11-2019523": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_1555_201903-10-20191356": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_848_202109-04-202120": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_116_202010-02-2020422": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_775_202024-07-202078": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_867_202014-10-20201148": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_146_202101-02-20211259": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_104_202006-02-2020559": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1606_202027-11-2020528": "DENIED", + "bailapplication_2329_201906-12-2019395": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_321_202108-02-20211140": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_665_202007-07-2020182": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_514_202028-05-2020439": "DENIED", + "bailapplication_1582_201925-11-2019578": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1352_202027-10-20201063": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_845_202009-09-20201364": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_744_202106-04-202182": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_311_202108-02-20211136": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_593_202031-08-20201481": "DENIED", + "bailapplication_2185_201931-10-2019921": "DENIED", + "bailapplication_1750_201925-09-20191485": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_1851_201921-10-20191045": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_618_202116-03-2021514": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_1788_201921-09-20191546": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1386_202007-11-2020854": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_736_202023-07-202087": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_412_202106-03-2021645": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_459_202007-07-2020181": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1364_202031-10-2020995": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1722_202005-01-20211598": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_118_202029-05-2020424": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1284_202019-10-20201125": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_787_202003-09-20201432": "DENIED", + "bailapplication_1881_201901-11-2019896": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1449_202012-11-2020748": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_978_202027-08-20201523": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1199_202014-10-20201155": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_73_202119-01-20211416": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_1927_201915-10-20191193": "DENIED", + "bailapplication_1850_201919-10-20191077": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1170_202001-10-20201247": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_332_202007-07-2020180": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_65_202111-01-20211503": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_484_202123-02-2021888": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_1723_201907-09-20191693": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_1995_201913-11-2019778": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1268_202019-10-20201123": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1315_202007-11-2020852": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_2372_201906-12-2019399": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_1539_201909-10-20191281": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_388_202108-02-20212454": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_979_202013-10-20201169": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_644_202119-03-2021389": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_275_202025-02-2020235": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1555_202026-11-2020576": "DENIED", + "bailapplication_1853_201901-10-20191387": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_358_202111-02-20211062": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_646_202126-03-2021228": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1520_202019-11-2020691": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1270_202019-10-20201124": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_353_202117-02-2021967": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_802_202024-07-202080": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_203_202004-06-2020372": "DENIED", + "bailapplication_1930_201901-10-20191392": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_473_202018-05-2020476": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_522_202122-03-2021321": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_659_202101-04-2021187": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_691_202126-03-2021231": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_802_202124-03-2021274": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1593_202005-12-2020477": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1514_202002-12-2020510": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1322_202004-11-2020943": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_208_202110-02-20211078": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_2178_201926-10-2019936": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_1630_201905-09-20191731": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_1976_201917-10-20191138": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1102_202001-10-20201241": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_857_202014-08-202064": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_563_202102-03-2021757": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_818_202027-08-20201502": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_438_202118-02-2021946": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_1700_201905-09-20191736": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_17_202122-01-20211374": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_170_202102-03-2021745": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1622_202006-10-20202190": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_291_202030-05-2020410": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_383_202110-02-20212361": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_378_202112-02-20211036": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_130_202012-02-2020367": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_554_202008-07-2020168": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1011_202020-08-202037": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1178_202005-10-20201235": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_220_202112-02-20211025": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_771_202105-04-2021105": "DENIED", + "bailapplication_763_201906-05-20191234": "DENIED", + "bailapplication_1823_201903-10-20191363": "DENIED", + "bailapplication_154_202022-01-2020757": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_547_202009-06-2020349": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_923_202007-09-20201400": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_376_202112-02-20211034": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1618_202006-10-20202188": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_852_202115-04-20211": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_2457_201917-01-2020841": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1447_202012-11-2020746": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1570_202023-12-202012": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_2207_201904-12-2019447": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_23_202118-01-20211434": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_769_202022-07-2020103": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_764_202024-08-20205": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_211_201903-09-2019483": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1563_202017-12-2020148": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_21_202005-02-2020569": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_795_201906-05-20191235": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_1661_201921-10-20191044": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_801_202007-09-20201398": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_605_202117-03-2021471": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_224_202105-03-2021667": "DENIED", + "bailapplication_177_202006-02-2020549": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_178_202128-01-20211329": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_2127_201915-11-2019736": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_1438_201906-09-20191702": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_441_202002-02-20212570": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_1102_201902-08-2019292": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_622_202123-03-2021291": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_449_202119-02-2021912": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_856_202106-04-202189": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_454_202119-02-2021917": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1516_202017-11-2020724": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1768_202023-10-20202130": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_671_202119-03-2021391": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_880_202107-04-202157": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_612_202105-03-2021678": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_2200_201916-11-2019700": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_604_202004-07-2020201": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_124_202125-02-2021815": "DENIED", + "bailapplication_149_202028-02-2020169": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_311_202012-06-2020317": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_265_202117-03-2021464": "DENIED", + "bailapplication_2453_201903-01-20201027": "DENIED", + "bailapplication_1565_201901-11-2019893": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_254_202127-01-20212719": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1719_202003-02-20211223": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_291_202109-03-2021561": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1607_202006-01-20211567": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_191_202109-02-20211095": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_2342_201910-12-2019333": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_117_202011-02-2020387": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_195_202108-02-20211127": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1214_202027-10-20201053": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1569_202023-11-2020643": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_588_202103-03-2021722": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_535_202003-06-2020385": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1737_202018-02-2021950": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_1725_201925-09-20191482": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_308_202108-02-20211135": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_2157_201925-10-2019960": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_12_202106-01-20211560": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_1824_201904-10-20191333": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_826_202027-08-20201503": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_531_202125-02-2021826": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_998_202010-09-20201354": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_2002_201915-11-2019731": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1396_202005-11-2020912": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_1208_201925-07-2019385": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_973_202027-08-20201522": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_681_202017-07-2020131": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_60_202106-01-20212942": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1742_202018-01-20211448": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_554_202103-04-2021127": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_559_202018-06-2020298": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1736_202002-02-20211246": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_118_202117-02-2021957": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1438_202004-11-2020955": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_595_202010-06-2020339": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_2091_201919-10-20191087": "DENIED", + "bailapplication_125_202030-01-2020658": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1689_202024-12-20204": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_895_202109-04-202125": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1349_202028-10-20201043": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_723_202126-03-2021233": "DENIED", + "bailapplication_1322_201907-09-20191683": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_2242_201907-11-2019837": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1335_202017-11-2020717": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1682_202018-12-2020122": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1220_202014-10-20201158": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1403_202002-11-2020982": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_231_202125-02-2021816": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1675_202024-12-20203": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_288_202105-03-2021670": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1146_202024-09-20201280": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1558_202004-12-2020489": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_343_202020-03-20204": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_2428_201904-01-20201006": "DENIED", + "bailapplication_2551_201914-01-2020875": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_697_202116-03-2021520": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_684_202007-07-2020184": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_832_202107-04-202152": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_77_202128-01-20211321": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_80_202015-02-2020316": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_150_202029-02-2020154": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1003_202011-09-20201333": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_619_202116-03-2021515": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_57_202116-01-20211465": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1644_202018-12-2020118": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1286_202020-10-20201116": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_477_202123-02-2021886": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1172_202014-10-20201152": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_333_202109-02-20211109": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_1662_201916-10-20191155": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_1405_201920-08-2019112": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_995_202009-09-20201372": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_469_202118-03-2021415": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_44_202009-07-2020160": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_783_202123-03-2021304": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_1721_201924-09-20191511": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1236_202014-10-20201160": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_160_202028-02-2020175": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_521_202106-03-2021652": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1249_202009-11-2020818": "DENIED", + "bailapplication_1767_201925-09-20191486": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_399_202109-02-20212402": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_627_202117-03-2021472": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1592_202011-01-20211507": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_190_202103-02-20211220": "DENIED", + "bailapplication_1404_201906-09-20191701": "DENIED", + "bailapplication_1931_201903-10-20191366": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1269_202013-11-2020730": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_455_202124-03-2021256": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_666_202109-03-2021579": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_120_202128-01-20211326": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1646_202014-12-2020215": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1426_202029-10-20201018": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_119_202020-02-2020262": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_32_202018-01-2020824": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_174_202110-02-20211075": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1287_202019-10-20201126": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1545_202024-11-2020610": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_265_202030-05-2020407": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1279_202012-11-2020745": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_200_202121-01-20212811": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_879_202020-08-202030": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_792_202024-07-202079": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_1786_201915-10-20191179": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1464_202019-11-2020685": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_658_202024-06-2020275": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_300_202109-02-20211101": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_196_201927-08-201918": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_131_202103-02-20211213": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_933_201917-06-2019790": "DENIED", + "bailapplication_2304_201922-11-2019613": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_942_201927-06-2019724": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_49_202118-01-20211437": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_347_202123-02-2021873": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_681_202116-03-2021517": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1380_202002-11-2020979": "DENIED", + "bail application_10_202023-01-20202627": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1019_202010-09-20201355": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1119_202005-10-20201232": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_725_202024-08-20203": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1615_202018-12-2020111": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_992_202003-09-20201442": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_471_202123-02-2021883": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_578_202012-06-2020325": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1342_202009-11-2020820": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_950_202027-08-20201517": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1716_202012-02-20211041": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1415_202023-11-2020635": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1469_202023-03-2021305": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_596_202012-06-2020326": "DENIED", + "bailapplication_1386_201926-08-201945": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1303_202028-10-20201037": "DENIED", + "bailapplication_1282_201920-08-2019106": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_1432_201907-09-20191684": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_1815_201924-09-20191520": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_116_202103-03-2021704": "DENIED", + "bailapplication_2217_201909-12-2019364": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1063_202005-09-20201410": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_193_202011-02-2020396": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1426_202021-11-20201849": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_88_202031-01-2020642": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1326_202002-11-2020976": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_914_202010-09-20201344": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_445_202102-03-2021750": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1353_202027-10-20201064": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_2370_201904-12-2019449": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_258_202104-02-20211201": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_799_202101-04-2021197": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_94_202006-02-2020557": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_156_202127-01-20211353": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_343_202119-03-2021380": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1156_202024-09-20201284": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_981_201912-06-2019839": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_215_202121-01-20212816": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1188_202006-10-20201219": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_807_202009-09-20201361": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_636_202116-03-2021516": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1522_202019-11-2020692": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_937_202002-09-20201458": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_592_202117-03-2021470": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1280_202014-10-20201164": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_600_202004-07-2020199": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_788_202124-03-2021268": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_110_202118-01-20211441": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_2042_201916-11-2019694": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1444_202011-11-2020768": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_685_202004-07-2020205": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_670_202106-04-202178": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_811_202126-03-2021239": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_98_202106-03-2021639": "DENIED", + "bailapplication_2462_201910-01-2020913": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_1827_201904-10-20191334": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1025_202022-10-20201082": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_301_202108-02-20211134": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1408_202024-11-2020606": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_418_202118-03-2021413": "DENIED", + "bailapplication_1129_201926-07-2019364": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_87_202031-01-2020641": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_764_202122-03-2021338": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_56_202117-02-2021956": "DENIED", + "bailapplication_1190_201927-07-2019342": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_252_202130-01-20212622": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_919_202027-08-20201515": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_748_202119-03-2021400": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_501_202118-03-2021417": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_441_202118-02-2021948": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_2124_201914-11-2019756": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_2330_201922-11-2019616": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1098_202011-09-20201338": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1005_202019-08-202046": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_2217_201909-12-2019363": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_415_202019-08-202038": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_2500_201919-12-201960": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_2381_201916-12-2019120": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_260_202108-03-2021604": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1304_202017-10-20201144": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1137_202015-09-20201321": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1690_202024-12-20205": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_281_202117-02-2021964": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1064_202014-10-20201149": "GRANTED", + "bailapplication_2495_201920-12-201945": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_202_202110-02-20211076": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1044_202002-09-20201476": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1226_202011-11-2020763": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_790_202124-03-2021269": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_639_202117-03-2021369": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1450_202025-09-20201210": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2069_202020-10-2020896": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2551_201918-10-2019679": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1609_202022-09-20201253": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1390_202027-08-20201449": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2324_202008-12-2020261": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_87_202116-01-20211349": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1865_202023-09-20201240": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_529_202005-01-20211526": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2099_201917-09-20191008": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1959_202012-10-20201024": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_575_202119-03-2021320": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2524_202010-12-2020235": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_3012_201905-02-2020434": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2726_202002-01-20211593": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_385_202123-02-2021723": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2674_201922-01-2020637": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1752_202012-10-20201018": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_504_202103-03-2021602": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2540_201924-10-2019583": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_605_202115-03-2021426": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2693_202021-12-2020126": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_799_202101-04-2021157": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1364_202003-09-20201379": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_890_201917-05-2019911": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2261_202010-11-2020628": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1208_202013-07-2020233": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_293_202019-02-2020242": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1976_201929-08-20195": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_288_202104-02-2021991": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_848_202108-04-202145": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2565_202011-01-20211447": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2362_201918-10-2019655": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2336_201921-10-2019609": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1259_202015-07-2020213": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1795_202019-10-2020911": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1442_202026-08-202011": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1132_202002-07-2020315": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_364_202011-06-2020424": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1723_202017-09-20201292": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1172_202012-08-202092": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2058_201902-09-20191204": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2098_201924-09-2019876": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_69_202116-01-20211345": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1922_201914-08-2019179": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1684_201911-07-2019436": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_466_202104-03-2021569": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1711_201912-09-20191071": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1750_201912-09-20191072": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2254_201920-11-2019382": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_93_202112-01-20211416": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1694_202017-09-20201291": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2599_201919-11-2019404": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1048_202026-06-2020347": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1063_202026-06-2020348": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1672_201903-08-2019225": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2317_202010-11-2020630": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1082_201924-05-2019819": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1893_201914-08-2019176": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2049_202012-10-20201031": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_954_202025-06-2020353": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1177_202013-07-2020231": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_773_202131-03-2021167": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2550_202005-12-2020308": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1258_202010-08-2020124": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2122_202007-11-2020666": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_153_202029-01-2020570": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_145_202115-01-20211370": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_578_202026-05-2020546": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1551_202022-09-20201250": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_442_202105-03-2021539": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1560_202027-08-20201458": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_661_202005-06-2020469": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_868_202106-04-202195": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1315_202014-08-202064": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_897_202106-04-2021100": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_520_202104-03-2021574": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_209_202103-02-20211019": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_638_202010-08-2020110": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2656_201916-11-2019436": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2602_201918-11-2019418": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1465_202031-08-20201413": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1657_202012-01-20211418": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_142_202112-02-2021839": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2389_202020-11-2020515": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2830_201923-12-201923": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1656_202016-09-20201306": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1162_202003-07-2020311": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1033_202001-07-2020320": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1476_201907-06-2019681": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_515_202017-03-202059": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_811_202102-04-2021130": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2669_201928-11-2019291": "GRANTED", + "BAIL APPLICATION_28_202003-10-202020": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_653_202120-04-20215": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2150_201903-09-20191192": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_854_202106-04-202192": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1911_202003-10-20201127": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1997_201911-09-20191099": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2139_202028-10-2020807": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1761_201915-07-2019393": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2339_202019-11-2020543": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1819_202001-10-20201136": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_835_202026-05-2020554": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_6_202012-02-2020327": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1701_202023-09-20201236": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1453_202024-08-202035": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_700_202021-05-2020582": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1115_201903-05-20191127": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2294_202005-11-2020723": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_555_202027-05-2020538": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2985_201901-01-2020836": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_646_202005-06-2020468": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2043_202005-11-2020708": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1212_201907-05-20191099": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2252_202006-11-2020690": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1796_201928-08-201925": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_582_202019-03-202032": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2630_201925-11-2019328": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2499_201924-10-2019577": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1270_202017-07-2020186": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_42_202116-01-20211341": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1149_201901-05-20191172": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_473_202109-03-2021480": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2382_201901-11-2019511": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1882_202030-09-20201156": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_282_202004-03-2020123": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1631_202017-09-20201289": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1386_202019-08-202045": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2414_201926-10-2019547": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_856_202002-06-2020498": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1193_201903-05-20191134": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1960_201902-09-20191201": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_72_202014-01-2020738": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2157_201916-09-20191026": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2034_202015-10-2020969": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2353_202006-11-2020695": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2958_201906-01-2020774": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1513_202015-09-20201324": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_109_202130-01-20211082": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_468_202027-01-20211149": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1384_202013-08-202086": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1968_201905-09-20191146": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_289_202101-02-20211062": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_823_202001-06-2020506": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2588_201901-11-2019520": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_503_202101-03-2021651": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_78_202020-01-2020672": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_84_202122-01-20211206": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1351_202013-08-202080": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1437_202016-09-20201297": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1474_201907-06-2019679": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2718_201926-11-2019311": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_207_202103-02-20211018": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_770_202029-05-2020530": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2727_201904-01-2020789": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1346_201921-05-2019871": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1690_202029-09-20201165": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_802_202125-03-2021204": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_51_202111-01-20211438": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2500_201904-01-2020787": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2037_201906-09-20191134": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2213_202006-11-2020685": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2005_201919-08-2019139": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1833_202022-09-20201262": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1142_201903-05-20191128": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_265_202103-02-20211027": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_366_202125-02-2021676": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_388_202015-02-2020296": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1840_202008-10-20201057": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1230_201903-05-20191141": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1255_202016-07-2020199": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2652_202021-12-2020117": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1485_202028-08-20201434": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2373_202027-11-2020378": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1477_201907-06-2019682": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_429_202123-03-2021227": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1815_202019-10-2020913": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1369_202017-08-202059": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_876_202005-06-2020472": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_797_202101-04-2021156": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2451_202027-11-2020383": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1619_202021-10-2020870": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1358_202013-08-202082": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2508_201901-11-2019514": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_406_202015-05-2020623": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2431_201904-10-2019783": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1313_202013-08-202075": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_516_202118-03-2021338": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2411_201918-10-2019657": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2245_202002-11-2020789": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_556_202104-03-2021581": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2156_202028-10-2020810": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_709_202123-03-2021240": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1348_202019-08-202042": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2426_201901-11-2019513": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1172_201909-05-20191050": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_243_202127-01-20211148": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_647_202020-01-20211260": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1422_201930-05-2019752": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2398_202018-11-2020572": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1233_202016-07-2020198": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1464_201915-06-2019599": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2047_202003-11-2020762": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1520_202014-09-20201339": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2739_202006-01-20211507": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2158_201928-09-2019841": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2598_202011-01-20211448": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_899_202108-04-202154": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2064_202019-10-2020922": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1815_201903-08-2019228": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1147_202006-07-2020300": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1698_202023-09-20201233": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1428_201925-06-2019529": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2337_202010-11-2020632": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1799_201911-11-2019448": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1290_202022-09-20201244": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2207_201916-09-20191028": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1646_202013-10-20201011": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_19_202116-01-20211336": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_37_202116-01-20211339": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2046_202012-10-20201030": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1224_201909-05-20191054": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_70_202031-01-2020538": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1661_202015-09-20201330": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_556_202014-05-2020633": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_698_202026-05-2020551": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_868_202009-06-2020450": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2116_201913-09-20191051": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_330_202110-02-2021874": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_138_202020-01-2020677": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2361_201904-10-2019781": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_736_202118-03-2021355": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_219_202102-02-20211037": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_313_202018-02-2020264": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_836_202002-06-2020496": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1384_201929-05-2019761": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_877_202107-04-202169": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_742_202131-03-2021165": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_63_202112-01-20211410": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_848_202001-06-2020507": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2921_201919-12-201976": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_684_202102-04-2021124": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_901_202107-04-202173": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2745_202004-01-20211574": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_861_202108-04-202148": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_670_202122-03-2021277": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_630_202118-03-2021349": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2003_201913-09-20191049": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_599_202005-01-20211528": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_596_202110-03-2021461": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2372_201909-10-2019748": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1630_202008-10-20201053": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1143_201901-05-20191169": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2332_202009-11-2020654": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1054_202013-07-2020226": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1995_201904-10-2019771": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2251_202005-11-2020718": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_62_202112-01-20211409": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_399_202029-02-2020168": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_2211_201921-09-2019913": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1936_202028-10-2020806": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2507_201916-11-2019431": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_474_202106-03-2021528": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_175_202104-02-2021984": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1574_201920-09-2019931": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_733_202123-03-2021243": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1069_202016-07-2020193": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_719_202120-04-20218": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_865_202107-04-202166": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1784_202013-10-20201012": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2690_202018-01-20211320": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_831_202003-07-2020308": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1900_202009-10-20201044": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_735_202123-03-2021244": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1112_201927-09-2019767": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_823_201930-07-2019191": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1588_202007-01-20211067": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1291_201919-11-2019402": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_884_201914-08-201999": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_646_202119-04-202116": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1076_201919-09-2019837": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_603_201912-06-2019616": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1493_201903-01-2020770": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1602_202014-12-2020130": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1135_201905-10-2019723": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1300_201906-12-2019251": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_863_201902-08-2019163": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_881_201916-08-201991": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1087_201923-09-2019798": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_474_201903-05-2019852": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1136_201905-10-2019724": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1177_201926-10-2019536": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_627_202001-06-2020471": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_493_201914-05-2019778": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_555_201927-05-2019721": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_796_202010-07-2020201": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_554_201924-05-2019737": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_425_202018-03-202030": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_850_202007-08-2020133": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_467_201914-05-2019777": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_201_202027-02-2020191": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_315_202018-03-202024": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1333_201925-11-2019355": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_406_202017-03-202046": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_91_202027-01-2020607": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_198_202027-02-2020189": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1048_201921-09-2019811": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1023_202001-10-2020667": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_858_202012-08-2020119": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1412_202026-11-2020237": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1556_202026-11-2020246": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_15_202020-01-2020660": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1597_202017-12-202085": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_867_202020-08-202058": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_145_202028-01-2020594": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_676_201926-06-2019559": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_228_202028-02-2020158": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1316_201923-11-2019359": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1085_201925-09-2019784": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_2_202001-02-2020538": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1196_201931-10-2019526": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_679_202020-06-2020345": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_54_202021-01-2020649": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_612_201911-07-2019430": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1373_202027-10-2020471": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_732_201906-07-2019484": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_733_202025-06-2020336": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1625_202017-12-202090": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1345_201904-12-2019284": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_82_202011-02-2020362": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_465_202123-03-2021238": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1549_202002-12-2020222": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1483_201903-01-2020769": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_551_202018-06-2020362": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_449_202119-03-2021278": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_27_202020-01-2020662": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1578_202009-12-2020166": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_593_201914-06-2019608": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1420_202010-11-2020351": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1486_202021-11-2020289": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1582_202014-12-2020125": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_534_201922-05-2019744": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_207_202020-02-2020257": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_481_201904-05-2019839": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_246_202117-02-2021660": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_952_202021-08-202050": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1100_201921-10-2019612": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_602_201929-06-2019540": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_43_202017-01-2020677": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1097_201901-10-2019753": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1172_201925-10-2019552": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1283_202015-10-2020551": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_673_202010-07-2020197": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_638_201917-06-2019604": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_936_201911-09-2019953": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_733_201908-07-2019472": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_944_201926-08-201931": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1109_201903-10-2019745": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1162_201916-10-2019670": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1407_201902-01-2020778": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_674_201929-06-2019544": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_557_201904-06-2019647": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_284_202006-03-202085": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_291_202018-03-202022": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1575_202005-01-20211077": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_263_202028-02-2020162": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1382_201911-12-2019192": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_919_201917-08-201981": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_775_202004-07-2020248": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1079_201920-09-2019820": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_726_202029-06-2020312": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_235_202019-02-2020275": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1114_202018-09-2020828": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1488_201904-01-2020756": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_411_202026-05-2020539": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_500_202123-04-20212": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_782_201931-07-2019178": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_914_201920-08-201965": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1455_201904-01-2020754": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_798_202030-07-2020172": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1031_201919-09-2019834": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1306_201921-11-2019378": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_544_201928-05-2019707": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_906_202021-08-202046": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1207_201925-10-2019559": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_614_201914-06-2019610": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_759_202002-07-2020285": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_692_201903-07-2019506": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_422_202117-03-2021308": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1238_201915-11-2019431": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_93_202028-01-2020588": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_188_202101-02-2021859": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1094_201921-09-2019813": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_619_202009-06-2020407": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1389_202003-11-2020423": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_825_202010-07-2020205": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_935_202021-08-202049": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1323_201925-11-2019354": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1239_201915-11-2019432": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_839_201902-08-2019161": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_209_202112-02-2021696": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_10_202115-01-20211013": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_83_202122-01-2021929": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_875_201913-08-2019105": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_939_201922-08-201952": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_373_202018-03-202029": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1596_202016-12-2020101": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_277_202005-03-2020102": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_165_202025-02-2020227": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_343_202017-03-202038": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1286_201916-11-2019424": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1395_202031-10-2020447": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1106_201924-09-2019791": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_22_202031-01-2020568": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1215_201921-11-2019374": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_147_202005-02-2020487": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_856_201903-08-2019151": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_320_202124-02-2021596": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_446_202115-03-2021355": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_905_202019-08-202072": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_938_201922-08-201951": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1312_201930-11-2019296": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_855_201903-08-2019150": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1374_201906-12-2019257": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_440_201902-05-2019860": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_924_201916-08-201995": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_834_202029-07-2020184": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_739_201901-07-2019531": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_156_202015-02-2020302": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1519_202001-12-2020225": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_687_202026-06-2020324": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1487_202026-11-2020240": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_880_202013-08-2020109": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_106_202005-02-2020483": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_668_202029-06-2020309": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_528_201927-05-2019719": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_494_201908-05-2019818": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_611_201911-07-2019429": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_741_201901-07-2019532": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_896_201909-08-2019117": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_905_201914-08-2019102": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_721_201910-07-2019442": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_795_201925-07-2019231": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_566_202028-05-2020513": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1657_202018-12-202078": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_879_202018-08-202081": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_295_202007-03-202067": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1262_201918-11-2019416": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_117_202027-02-2020181": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_63_202005-02-2020496": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_481_202011-05-2020654": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_31_202116-01-2021984": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1116_201915-10-2019676": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_594_201910-06-2019624": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1156_201911-10-2019698": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_485_202016-05-2020608": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_462_201901-05-2019871": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_264_202025-02-2020228": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_13_202028-01-2020586": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_239_202110-02-2021738": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_30_202115-01-20211019": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_719_201910-07-2019441": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_877_201913-08-2019106": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_996_201904-09-20191011": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_969_201928-08-201914": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1235_201902-11-2019513": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_845_201908-08-2019122": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_72_202024-02-2020243": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_570_201921-06-2019585": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_655_201929-06-2019543": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1371_201905-12-2019276": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_931_201921-08-201960": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1363_202031-10-2020443": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1452_202011-11-2020346": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1105_201920-09-2019822": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1176_201905-11-2019489": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1530_202026-11-2020244": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1565_202007-12-2020179": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_717_201905-07-2019491": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_780_202006-07-2020230": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_131_202017-02-2020294": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_684_201911-07-2019431": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_864_202010-08-2020129": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_4_202111-01-20211043": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1293_201921-11-2019376": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_934_202019-08-202076": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_813_202006-07-2020234": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_750_202002-07-2020284": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1438_201903-01-2020763": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1104_201924-09-2019790": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1221_201925-10-2019561": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_902_202014-08-202099": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_443_202019-06-2020350": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1083_201905-11-2019488": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_672_202016-06-2020373": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_528_202126-03-2021189": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_486_202001-06-2020461": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_660_201924-06-2019572": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_506_201914-05-2019780": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1026_201902-09-20191033": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1139_201922-10-2019590": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_525_201920-05-2019755": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_969_202027-08-20201046": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_750_201911-07-2019434": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_701_201926-06-2019562": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_986_201930-08-20191053": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1118_201903-10-2019746": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1125_201918-10-2019646": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_78_202023-01-2020627": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_164_202005-03-202095": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_400_202112-03-2021359": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1440_201907-01-2020733": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1055_201917-09-2019852": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_58_202017-01-2020681": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_503_202122-03-2021256": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1394_202031-10-2020446": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1161_201916-10-2019669": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1479_201901-02-2020537": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_599_201907-06-2019634": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_906_201919-08-201972": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_337_202017-03-202037": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1089_201920-09-2019821": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_372_202018-03-202028": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_570_202029-05-2020498": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_103_202121-01-2021937": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_1360_201930-11-2019298": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_643_201929-06-2019541": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_287_202005-03-2020103": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_467_202013-05-2020635": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_977_201931-08-20191040": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_345_202012-05-2020638": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_764_202003-07-2020268": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_244_202028-02-2020160": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_1305_201921-11-2019377": "GRANTED", + "Bail Application_897_202021-08-202045": "DENIED", + "Bail Application_444_202116-03-2021331": "GRANTED" + }, + "lsi": { + "100002997": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 300", + "Section 34" + ], + "100004477": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1000086": [ + "Section 201" + ], + "100011766": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 109", + "Section 148", + "Section 427" + ], + "100013546": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 506", + "Section 294" + ], + "1000154": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302" + ], + "100109844": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 354", + "Section 120B", + "Section 506", + "Section 448", + "Section 376", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 511" + ], + "100114": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "1001315": [ + "Section 500", + "Section 34", + "Section 114", + "Section 448", + "Section 147", + "Section 109", + "Section 419", + "Section 379", + "Section 465", + "Section 471", + "Section 467" + ], + "1001340": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467", + "Section 419", + "Section 468" + ], + "100207928": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 294", + "Section 506" + ], + "1002165": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 304" + ], + "100216874": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B" + ], + "100228588": [ + "Section 332", + "Section 34", + "Section 320" + ], + "100230239": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 337" + ], + "100256482": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 506" + ], + "100261854": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 411", + "Section 397", + "Section 380" + ], + "100276081": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 379", + "Section 120B" + ], + "1002969": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 482", + "Section 395", + "Section 457" + ], + "10029846": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 482", + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 155", + "Section 120B", + "Section 302" + ], + "100614596": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 34", + "Section 411", + "Section 397" + ], + "1006937": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 302" + ], + "100657719": [ + "Section 229A" + ], + "100662170": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 376" + ], + "1006818": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498", + "Section 34", + "Section 107" + ], + "100685038": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 471", + "Section 409", + "Section 468" + ], + "148507646": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 376", + "Section 375" + ], + "148537007": [ + "Section 304B" + ], + "57232357": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 164", + "Section 324", + "Section 304", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 161" + ], + "572399": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 34" + ], + "572471": [ + "Section 228", + "Section 354", + "Section 376", + "Section 498A", + "Section 511", + "Section 302" + ], + "5725377": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 147" + ], + "573457": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "190657235": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "190684713": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 155", + "Section 482", + "Section 156" + ], + "101425148": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 498" + ], + "101428": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 366", + "Section 342", + "Section 376" + ], + "101433035": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 397" + ], + "5737369": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 504", + "Section 324", + "Section 307" + ], + "57377352": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 3", + "Section 34" + ], + "57387871": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 307" + ], + "573959": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 109" + ], + "32179022": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "3218201": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "321914": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 471", + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 201", + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 409", + "Section 465" + ], + "859435": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 500" + ], + "139185": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1391879": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "176199853": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "44960459": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "44971186": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "44971619": [ + "Section 419", + "Section 304" + ], + "44974857": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B" + ], + "71958771": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 201", + "Section 34", + "Section 109", + "Section 394", + "Section 190" + ], + "7196087": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 341", + "Section 324", + "Section 448", + "Section 148", + "Section 342", + "Section 323", + "Section 147" + ], + "1448780": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "144878298": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 506", + "Section 354" + ], + "14489038": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 34", + "Section 482" + ], + "1810324": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 304A", + "Section 326", + "Section 338", + "Section 337", + "Section 336", + "Section 304", + "Section 228", + "Section 299", + "Section 161" + ], + "181041013": [ + "Section 363" + ], + "181044": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "181047243": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 341", + "Section 304", + "Section 34" + ], + "86046025": [ + "Section 332", + "Section 394" + ], + "125373392": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 437" + ], + "125376077": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1253831": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 307" + ], + "1253927": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "27077221": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "27092778": [ + "Section 363" + ], + "27098405": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 498A", + "Section 324" + ], + "196396428": [ + "Section 509", + "Section 498", + "Section 354" + ], + "1963991": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 201" + ], + "100179060": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 109", + "Section 120B", + "Section 509", + "Section 342", + "Section 465" + ], + "1001846": [ + "Section 200" + ], + "184608034": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "184611480": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 325" + ], + "184612246": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 3" + ], + "184618070": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "184680320": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "184688365": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "164426223": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 447", + "Section 384", + "Section 120B", + "Section 448", + "Section 323", + "Section 427" + ], + "164431109": [ + "Section 173", + "Section 376", + "Section 307", + "Section 504", + "Section 354", + "Section 143", + "Section 506" + ], + "16444646": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 506", + "Section 300" + ], + "190789703": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B" + ], + "929059": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 164", + "Section 506", + "Section 304" + ], + "92913430": [ + "Section 143", + "Section 436", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 149" + ], + "92925": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 415" + ], + "92928814": [ + "Section 395" + ], + "88891665": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 498" + ], + "88897345": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 420" + ], + "888988": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 364", + "Section 161", + "Section 326", + "Section 452" + ], + "88906858": [ + "Section 366A", + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 375", + "Section 4", + "Section 34" + ], + "159800812": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376" + ], + "159807444": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 148", + "Section 324", + "Section 307" + ], + "159813": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 397", + "Section 452" + ], + "159816638": [ + "Section 509", + "Section 279" + ], + "184881878": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 188", + "Section 467", + "Section 302" + ], + "1850197": [ + "Section 149" + ], + "1081440": [ + "Section 397" + ], + "108145462": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 448", + "Section 109", + "Section 384", + "Section 342", + "Section 397" + ], + "92956542": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 354", + "Section 511", + "Section 341" + ], + "92968045": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 509" + ], + "2721423": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467", + "Section 409" + ], + "272312": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 498A", + "Section 397", + "Section 420" + ], + "272368": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 482", + "Section 468" + ], + "2723745": [ + "Section 366A", + "Section 120B" + ], + "272489": [ + "Section 447", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 326" + ], + "75670": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 307", + "Section 364" + ], + "75685948": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 304", + "Section 323", + "Section 452", + "Section 324" + ], + "80160831": [ + "Section 5", + "Section 3" + ], + "80162727": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 447", + "Section 147" + ], + "80165248": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 397" + ], + "80173546": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 114", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 326", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 143" + ], + "80182786": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "801831": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 494", + "Section 420" + ], + "80210422": [ + "Section 155", + "Section 482", + "Section 34", + "Section 156" + ], + "655162": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 511", + "Section 3" + ], + "65531581": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 438" + ], + "65532455": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 186" + ], + "65536520": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506" + ], + "171256546": [ + "Section 5" + ], + "171259289": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 506", + "Section 420", + "Section 147" + ], + "171273792": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 341", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 149" + ], + "171285223": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307" + ], + "62009027": [ + "Section 107", + "Section 306" + ], + "620092": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "62027430": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 409", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 120B", + "Section 482", + "Section 155", + "Section 156", + "Section 406" + ], + "62030907": [ + "Section 363" + ], + "57502417": [ + "Section 415", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 120", + "Section 120B", + "Section 417", + "Section 419" + ], + "57506863": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 326" + ], + "57515983": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 354", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 365", + "Section 364", + "Section 120B", + "Section 468", + "Section 406", + "Section 447", + "Section 448", + "Section 420", + "Section 427" + ], + "57536027": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 427", + "Section 279", + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 379", + "Section 186" + ], + "196699977": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 338", + "Section 353", + "Section 336", + "Section 279" + ], + "392825": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 324" + ], + "39297150": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 437" + ], + "14496522": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 120", + "Section 417" + ], + "144974744": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 411", + "Section 392", + "Section 394" + ], + "1516174": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 304", + "Section 326", + "Section 409", + "Section 300", + "Section 34" + ], + "1516185": [ + "Section 313", + "Section 302" + ], + "181052423": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "181059475": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 326", + "Section 320", + "Section 511", + "Section 300" + ], + "181069416": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 300", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 304", + "Section 326" + ], + "181074547": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 320" + ], + "181075046": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 384", + "Section 354" + ], + "132588334": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 294", + "Section 392", + "Section 302" + ], + "135197749": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 326", + "Section 149", + "Section 147" + ], + "1145175": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 143" + ], + "11454158": [ + "Section 229A" + ], + "1204789": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 341", + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 324" + ], + "120492930": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 149", + "Section 323", + "Section 302", + "Section 161", + "Section 173", + "Section 147", + "Section 304" + ], + "151638110": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 325", + "Section 308", + "Section 34", + "Section 438" + ], + "151645757": [ + "Section 509", + "Section 354", + "Section 376" + ], + "180968174": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 294", + "Section 320", + "Section 397", + "Section 325" + ], + "180968929": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "1809795": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 397" + ], + "180990281": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 353", + "Section 427", + "Section 323", + "Section 332", + "Section 324", + "Section 107", + "Section 307", + "Section 504" + ], + "1809946": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 406", + "Section 471", + "Section 465", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 120B", + "Section 468" + ], + "180999094": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 120B" + ], + "181007271": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 380", + "Section 436", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 313" + ], + "145146985": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "145154541": [ + "Section 375", + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 120B" + ], + "145163182": [ + "Section 156", + "Section 376", + "Section 420", + "Section 375", + "Section 200", + "Section 354" + ], + "111528249": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 201", + "Section 409", + "Section 468", + "Section 467" + ], + "45073428": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 354" + ], + "45078780": [ + "Section 5", + "Section 4" + ], + "45079581": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 354" + ], + "450905": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "45112277": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 120B" + ], + "45114772": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "451202": [ + "Section 107", + "Section 109", + "Section 420", + "Section 417", + "Section 34", + "Section 482", + "Section 448", + "Section 452" + ], + "45120269": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "4513490": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 354", + "Section 307" + ], + "62618902": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 156" + ], + "10214100": [ + "Section 457", + "Section 380", + "Section 420" + ], + "102143277": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 448", + "Section 427", + "Section 120B", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 379", + "Section 34" + ], + "102147190": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 365", + "Section 397", + "Section 307", + "Section 34" + ], + "1021477": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 161" + ], + "185411780": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 324" + ], + "185414224": [ + "Section 279", + "Section 304A" + ], + "185414428": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 420" + ], + "1991572": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "199177969": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 34", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 326", + "Section 143", + "Section 147", + "Section 307" + ], + "161420707": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 147" + ], + "656257": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "65629250": [ + "Section 107", + "Section 109" + ], + "65647549": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 392", + "Section 504", + "Section 452", + "Section 511" + ], + "104417116": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 438", + "Section 294" + ], + "104425615": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 313", + "Section 366A", + "Section 363", + "Section 164" + ], + "14508989": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 452", + "Section 420" + ], + "626451": [ + "Section 120B" + ], + "62647592": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 420", + "Section 506", + "Section 471", + "Section 406", + "Section 379", + "Section 468" + ], + "62648830": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 294" + ], + "62650975": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 306", + "Section 304", + "Section 498A" + ], + "57459547": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 326", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "5797148": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 323", + "Section 336" + ], + "58119813": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 376" + ], + "59784183": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "1129829": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 161" + ], + "112983733": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 304", + "Section 279" + ], + "112990375": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 468" + ], + "112993089": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302" + ], + "129227728": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "129243784": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 366A" + ], + "129257351": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 406" + ], + "129263293": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 419", + "Section 471", + "Section 120B" + ], + "129275586": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 376", + "Section 511" + ], + "1292975": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 156", + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 120B", + "Section 506", + "Section 201", + "Section 482", + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 452" + ], + "51266058": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 498", + "Section 2" + ], + "512707": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 326", + "Section 389", + "Section 324" + ], + "51273118": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 498A", + "Section 307" + ], + "512734": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 394", + "Section 392" + ], + "187939192": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 427" + ], + "187940442": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 506" + ], + "164494426": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1644996": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 452", + "Section 34", + "Section 427" + ], + "1645128": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "1393254": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 375", + "Section 323", + "Section 511" + ], + "139340314": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 363", + "Section 304", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "141149742": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 326", + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 3" + ], + "141161504": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 323", + "Section 354", + "Section 452", + "Section 498A", + "Section 494", + "Section 161", + "Section 120B", + "Section 324", + "Section 109" + ], + "109776748": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 3" + ], + "1045226": [ + "Section 338", + "Section 304A", + "Section 304", + "Section 279" + ], + "104543016": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 341", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506" + ], + "104544046": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 447", + "Section 307", + "Section 438", + "Section 448", + "Section 326" + ], + "104559364": [ + "Section 366A", + "Section 363", + "Section 376" + ], + "656633": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "656944": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 147" + ], + "65701076": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 406", + "Section 498A" + ], + "65706920": [ + "Section 389", + "Section 363" + ], + "65708519": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 457", + "Section 392" + ], + "701389": [ + "Section 161" + ], + "70151264": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 506" + ], + "701574": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 279" + ], + "70167059": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "1967199": [ + "Section 500", + "Section 504" + ], + "196723920": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 294" + ], + "1967374": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 420", + "Section 109", + "Section 120B", + "Section 468", + "Section 409", + "Section 471", + "Section 417", + "Section 467" + ], + "196743485": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107", + "Section 420", + "Section 34", + "Section 406" + ], + "196746869": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 394", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "17772151": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 448", + "Section 376", + "Section 438" + ], + "1777261": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 482", + "Section 120B", + "Section 173", + "Section 406" + ], + "177732705": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 3", + "Section 147", + "Section 379" + ], + "177739763": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 279" + ], + "1777433": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 415" + ], + "177748019": [ + "Section 494" + ], + "32124251": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 411", + "Section 379" + ], + "27404919": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 304A", + "Section 120B" + ], + "27412663": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506" + ], + "27430217": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 452", + "Section 324", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 427" + ], + "173707254": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "173730842": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 506" + ], + "173734737": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "1737363": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 147" + ], + "142653930": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 186" + ], + "1426762": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 148", + "Section 326" + ], + "83822616": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 506", + "Section 164" + ], + "838245": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 457", + "Section 324", + "Section 302", + "Section 506", + "Section 147", + "Section 504", + "Section 307" + ], + "163150513": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 34", + "Section 304B", + "Section 302" + ], + "163153229": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 448" + ], + "163163002": [ + "Section 436", + "Section 427", + "Section 294" + ], + "163166888": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 307", + "Section 376" + ], + "163168131": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 120B", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "1811092": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "181109775": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 34" + ], + "18111391": [ + "Section 313", + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 411", + "Section 380" + ], + "181115569": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 341" + ], + "181115799": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 120B", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 300" + ], + "1811251": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "1824138": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 120B", + "Section 406", + "Section 482", + "Section 5" + ], + "1824198": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 420", + "Section 509" + ], + "182420429": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "182421470": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 332", + "Section 148", + "Section 427", + "Section 149" + ], + "182439449": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 324", + "Section 320" + ], + "1824399": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 366", + "Section 504", + "Section 307", + "Section 395", + "Section 304", + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 397", + "Section 324", + "Section 411", + "Section 306", + "Section 149", + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 498A", + "Section 147", + "Section 354", + "Section 452" + ], + "1825211": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 161" + ], + "182523082": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1825522": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "35563330": [ + "Section 186", + "Section 504", + "Section 353", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 143" + ], + "35565999": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 201", + "Section 147", + "Section 342", + "Section 341", + "Section 325", + "Section 120", + "Section 364" + ], + "39397410": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 447", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 354", + "Section 341", + "Section 34" + ], + "129406662": [ + "Section 173" + ], + "123034489": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 326", + "Section 325", + "Section 294", + "Section 307" + ], + "123054413": [ + "Section 384", + "Section 34" + ], + "12325344": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 304" + ], + "123266118": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 452", + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A" + ], + "120641431": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 341", + "Section 438" + ], + "120646485": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 323", + "Section 307", + "Section 325", + "Section 34" + ], + "120651721": [ + "Section 13" + ], + "120651822": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 3" + ], + "120653224": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 406", + "Section 173" + ], + "7203306": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 406", + "Section 417", + "Section 313", + "Section 376" + ], + "72047307": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "96101496": [ + "Section 375", + "Section 376" + ], + "961142": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 304B" + ], + "961157": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 504" + ], + "961177": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 325", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 120B", + "Section 148" + ], + "54519122": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 364", + "Section 34" + ], + "154611175": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 302" + ], + "154616874": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "154619101": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 452", + "Section 506", + "Section 427" + ], + "154623": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 161" + ], + "1557387": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 409" + ], + "1557443": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "219072": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 420", + "Section 155", + "Section 34", + "Section 156" + ], + "187950183": [ + "Section 308", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "1879682": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 228" + ], + "18797028": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 294", + "Section 506" + ], + "1879724": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 337" + ], + "1748005": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 365" + ], + "1748019": [ + "Section 500" + ], + "135224256": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 354" + ], + "1206566": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 326", + "Section 452", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "120878562": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 354", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "1209524": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 342" + ], + "121002781": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 120" + ], + "121180369": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 354" + ], + "1213221": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 324" + ], + "157977482": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 363" + ], + "157983178": [ + "Section 511", + "Section 34", + "Section 380" + ], + "149971273": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 34" + ], + "35618988": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 506", + "Section 494", + "Section 417" + ], + "356282": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "35637438": [ + "Section 308", + "Section 353", + "Section 34", + "Section 186", + "Section 438" + ], + "35642033": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 420" + ], + "27432913": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 420", + "Section 506", + "Section 419", + "Section 406" + ], + "27451835": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 420" + ], + "4201226": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 5", + "Section 411" + ], + "42040245": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 34", + "Section 394" + ], + "146667457": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "1466771": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A" + ], + "164540658": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 323" + ], + "164544071": [ + "Section 389" + ], + "126615579": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306" + ], + "1266179": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 354" + ], + "106031260": [ + "Section 389", + "Section 2", + "Section 302", + "Section 114", + "Section 109", + "Section 149" + ], + "800880": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 304" + ], + "80088180": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 506" + ], + "77462359": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 452", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 294", + "Section 149" + ], + "77475584": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "91100141": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 302" + ], + "167825896": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "167826208": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 34" + ], + "167847813": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 342", + "Section 364" + ], + "167850999": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 366" + ], + "195675535": [ + "Section 109" + ], + "195680154": [ + "Section 188" + ], + "72058294": [ + "Section 366A", + "Section 363", + "Section 120B" + ], + "72059277": [ + "Section 4", + "Section 5" + ], + "72067159": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 299" + ], + "72069810": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 452", + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "721224": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 364", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 201" + ], + "72144878": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 324", + "Section 300", + "Section 313" + ], + "72164077": [ + "Section 229A" + ], + "72175063": [ + "Section 164" + ], + "72178856": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "1264941": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 465", + "Section 420", + "Section 409", + "Section 494" + ], + "12650143": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "126502991": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 438", + "Section 323" + ], + "1265060": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 323", + "Section 452", + "Section 161", + "Section 120B", + "Section 107" + ], + "1265106": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 279" + ], + "126514921": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "15581499": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 447", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "155817275": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 468", + "Section 419", + "Section 467", + "Section 471" + ], + "1558197": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 4", + "Section 341", + "Section 120B" + ], + "155823652": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 438", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "155906744": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 323" + ], + "15591148": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 143" + ], + "1559172": [ + "Section 164", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 109", + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 149" + ], + "1644526": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 299" + ], + "164522627": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 353", + "Section 341" + ], + "165004635": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 34", + "Section 397", + "Section 395", + "Section 342" + ], + "155922786": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 294" + ], + "1559235": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 313" + ], + "155930046": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "75775094": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 420", + "Section 406" + ], + "75792424": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 341", + "Section 406", + "Section 506" + ], + "757965": [ + "Section 409" + ], + "961716": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 120B", + "Section 420" + ], + "9618281": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "837269": [ + "Section 193" + ], + "837400": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "147422217": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "147428251": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 323", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1474495": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 341", + "Section 294" + ], + "147456049": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 324" + ], + "1240421": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 147", + "Section 506", + "Section 324", + "Section 323" + ], + "124245784": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 120" + ], + "124252462": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 34", + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 494", + "Section 323" + ], + "124259498": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A" + ], + "27664526": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 511", + "Section 376", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 302", + "Section 342", + "Section 389" + ], + "54638181": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467", + "Section 302", + "Section 200" + ], + "54640623": [ + "Section 201" + ], + "54645213": [ + "Section 13" + ], + "135273567": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 2" + ], + "13528365": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 438" + ], + "135286738": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 506", + "Section 341", + "Section 34" + ], + "136555602": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 201", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "27770277": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 313" + ], + "27801905": [ + "Section 114", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 326" + ], + "177793048": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 397", + "Section 341" + ], + "177800411": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 307", + "Section 299" + ], + "191657160": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A", + "Section 506", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1916864": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 304", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 394", + "Section 392", + "Section 447", + "Section 364", + "Section 299" + ], + "1916912": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 109", + "Section 34" + ], + "41216": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 120B" + ], + "412195": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "41232041": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 506", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 504", + "Section 471" + ], + "412326": [ + "Section 156", + "Section 190", + "Section 200", + "Section 307", + "Section 395", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 448", + "Section 173", + "Section 342", + "Section 149" + ], + "41233119": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 120B", + "Section 341", + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "873446": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 193", + "Section 120B", + "Section 397", + "Section 417" + ], + "87345004": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 366A", + "Section 363" + ], + "87347014": [ + "Section 2", + "Section 34", + "Section 120", + "Section 494", + "Section 201", + "Section 114", + "Section 188", + "Section 186" + ], + "35645809": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 120B", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 342", + "Section 323", + "Section 457", + "Section 364", + "Section 147", + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "35651511": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "3565310": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 457", + "Section 511" + ], + "356651": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 228" + ], + "35666509": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "35689524": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 506" + ], + "197673637": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "197686758": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 452", + "Section 34", + "Section 409" + ], + "55602852": [ + "Section 155", + "Section 420", + "Section 120", + "Section 506", + "Section 156", + "Section 147", + "Section 468", + "Section 471" + ], + "556273": [ + "Section 500", + "Section 409" + ], + "1192484": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 308", + "Section 325", + "Section 4" + ], + "119249290": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "119255830": [ + "Section 173", + "Section 307", + "Section 149" + ], + "1192626": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 13", + "Section 120B", + "Section 409", + "Section 468" + ], + "20362476": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 468", + "Section 13", + "Section 320", + "Section 467" + ], + "166655104": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 406" + ], + "166665406": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 120B", + "Section 229A" + ], + "166667702": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 506" + ], + "34013979": [ + "Section 5", + "Section 506" + ], + "340375": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 147", + "Section 506", + "Section 427" + ], + "340421": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 161", + "Section 34", + "Section 389", + "Section 302", + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 304", + "Section 5" + ], + "34215331": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "342168": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 120B", + "Section 302", + "Section 364", + "Section 365", + "Section 201", + "Section 342" + ], + "342313": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467", + "Section 506", + "Section 504" + ], + "34246278": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 465", + "Section 417", + "Section 511" + ], + "1310174": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 34" + ], + "1310205": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304", + "Section 323", + "Section 302" + ], + "131034145": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 149" + ], + "637911": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 332" + ], + "63794871": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 120B", + "Section 201", + "Section 147", + "Section 354" + ], + "82368217": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 506", + "Section 467", + "Section 34", + "Section 156", + "Section 468", + "Section 465", + "Section 471" + ], + "82372371": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 34", + "Section 411", + "Section 397" + ], + "823745": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 323" + ], + "80296583": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 308" + ], + "80303768": [ + "Section 498A" + ], + "136639961": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 294", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 341", + "Section 147" + ], + "598946": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 324", + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 300", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 143", + "Section 148", + "Section 323" + ], + "59896069": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 437" + ], + "374797": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 471", + "Section 465", + "Section 200" + ], + "374918": [ + "Section 4", + "Section 3", + "Section 114", + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 5" + ], + "106299458": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 504", + "Section 161" + ], + "1063154": [ + "Section 494" + ], + "827844": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 279" + ], + "82789127": [ + "Section 336", + "Section 504", + "Section 308", + "Section 147", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "8280810": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 397" + ], + "828125": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 419" + ], + "82814": [ + "Section 417", + "Section 147", + "Section 323" + ], + "172420": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "172421888": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "172427186": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 34", + "Section 300" + ], + "172427389": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 120B", + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "172465550": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 427", + "Section 307", + "Section 353", + "Section 325", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 326" + ], + "1724821": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "172499102": [ + "Section 229A" + ], + "70248453": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 302" + ], + "131117428": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 302" + ], + "131145520": [ + "Section 279", + "Section 338", + "Section 304" + ], + "68363941": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 120B" + ], + "68365": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 427", + "Section 147", + "Section 109", + "Section 436", + "Section 228", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 395", + "Section 201" + ], + "68368326": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 326", + "Section 354", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 336", + "Section 307", + "Section 186", + "Section 147" + ], + "68380224": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 324" + ], + "67126966": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 143", + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 147", + "Section 323" + ], + "67143853": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 148", + "Section 427", + "Section 149", + "Section 186" + ], + "67148013": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 332", + "Section 148", + "Section 354", + "Section 326", + "Section 149", + "Section 325", + "Section 186", + "Section 147" + ], + "67154806": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 148" + ], + "190160832": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 376", + "Section 342", + "Section 363" + ], + "1901678": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 415", + "Section 417" + ], + "1170821": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 313" + ], + "117093663": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 342" + ], + "116122910": [ + "Section 190", + "Section 148", + "Section 342", + "Section 336", + "Section 482", + "Section 147" + ], + "116132835": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 323", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 324", + "Section 406", + "Section 307", + "Section 325", + "Section 34", + "Section 506" + ], + "116146306": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 427", + "Section 452" + ], + "116147682": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "113594022": [ + "Section 395", + "Section 437", + "Section 365", + "Section 394" + ], + "113615073": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "114073932": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 467" + ], + "191754199": [ + "Section 190", + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 120B" + ], + "191772687": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 376" + ], + "193929243": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 147", + "Section 341", + "Section 325" + ], + "193932164": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 366", + "Section 363" + ], + "1939497": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 419", + "Section 120B", + "Section 109", + "Section 471", + "Section 482" + ], + "193956482": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 109", + "Section 156", + "Section 107" + ], + "29968923": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "58722568": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 320", + "Section 482" + ], + "46875512": [ + "Section 409" + ], + "46877689": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 120B", + "Section 366A", + "Section 363" + ], + "46889544": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 323" + ], + "54420122": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "5443384": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 120", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 107", + "Section 482" + ], + "536301": [ + "Section 279", + "Section 304", + "Section 338" + ], + "53631140": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "536575": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 353", + "Section 500", + "Section 332", + "Section 465", + "Section 467", + "Section 228", + "Section 186" + ], + "52873061": [ + "Section 120", + "Section 420", + "Section 406" + ], + "52874793": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "52875818": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 324", + "Section 342", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "78439089": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294" + ], + "78458534": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 120B", + "Section 364", + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 34" + ], + "78459460": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "2881102": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 380", + "Section 120" + ], + "28814": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "28816449": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "28844722": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "38380393": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 341", + "Section 143", + "Section 161", + "Section 173" + ], + "38399674": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 376", + "Section 420" + ], + "24323558": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294" + ], + "106963264": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 341", + "Section 379", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "106964638": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 147", + "Section 149", + "Section 34", + "Section 120B", + "Section 107", + "Section 307" + ], + "106964898": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "106965888": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 294", + "Section 307" + ], + "1069704": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 149", + "Section 302" + ], + "106971990": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 420" + ], + "33361457": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 308", + "Section 506" + ], + "33364546": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 147", + "Section 448", + "Section 326", + "Section 336", + "Section 384", + "Section 148", + "Section 427", + "Section 397", + "Section 392", + "Section 302", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "33367236": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "33374567": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "3338175": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 308", + "Section 323" + ], + "103288179": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 306", + "Section 506", + "Section 107", + "Section 452" + ], + "138091376": [ + "Section 500", + "Section 2" + ], + "1381011": [ + "Section 190", + "Section 173", + "Section 200", + "Section 323", + "Section 313", + "Section 161", + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 504", + "Section 307", + "Section 228" + ], + "138108201": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 279", + "Section 337", + "Section 397" + ], + "173890904": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 363" + ], + "1739206": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "83900749": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "839250": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 302" + ], + "128284980": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 294" + ], + "9189167": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 143", + "Section 307", + "Section 308", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "91898248": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "3067047": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 354", + "Section 341" + ], + "30673773": [ + "Section 164" + ], + "30675088": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 325", + "Section 307" + ], + "306755": [ + "Section 447", + "Section 366" + ], + "30675551": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 143", + "Section 336", + "Section 188", + "Section 438", + "Section 448", + "Section 427" + ], + "62844266": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107", + "Section 34" + ], + "62921135": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 34", + "Section 482" + ], + "6293041": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467" + ], + "629343": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 147" + ], + "163757233": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "1637586": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "1637820": [ + "Section 417", + "Section 415" + ], + "168533346": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 120B", + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 148", + "Section 302" + ], + "168611": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 300" + ], + "168632550": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "1458448": [ + "Section 419", + "Section 415", + "Section 420", + "Section 417", + "Section 482" + ], + "145857444": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 306", + "Section 302", + "Section 498A", + "Section 201", + "Section 149" + ], + "158036859": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 323", + "Section 452" + ], + "46050866": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 149", + "Section 307" + ], + "46057759": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 325" + ], + "460585": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 186" + ], + "110597100": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 149", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 448", + "Section 394", + "Section 143" + ], + "110610364": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 307", + "Section 190", + "Section 427", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 149" + ], + "311779": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "311923": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 376", + "Section 380" + ], + "3119836": [ + "Section 308", + "Section 376", + "Section 406", + "Section 498", + "Section 323", + "Section 511", + "Section 325", + "Section 379" + ], + "231943": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 109", + "Section 420" + ], + "156792962": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 452", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "156794396": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "1567989": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 427", + "Section 294" + ], + "1568026": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 161", + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 409", + "Section 467", + "Section 389", + "Section 5" + ], + "156811891": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 438" + ], + "733826": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 5" + ], + "733991": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 406" + ], + "73407293": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 498A" + ], + "73411093": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294", + "Section 324", + "Section 436", + "Section 325", + "Section 336", + "Section 34" + ], + "744839": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 406" + ], + "74526543": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "74529379": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 447" + ], + "9801036": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 147", + "Section 341", + "Section 504", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 332", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 342", + "Section 323", + "Section 326", + "Section 149", + "Section 186" + ], + "98021687": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 375", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 323" + ], + "98028172": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 417", + "Section 376", + "Section 419" + ], + "980303": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 161", + "Section 394", + "Section 109", + "Section 313" + ], + "98031146": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 304A" + ], + "968995": [ + "Section 228", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 143", + "Section 325", + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "969122": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 109", + "Section 164" + ], + "96915844": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 392", + "Section 397", + "Section 394", + "Section 379" + ], + "96916297": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 409", + "Section 120B", + "Section 384", + "Section 188", + "Section 120", + "Section 465" + ], + "1312861": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 299", + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "124279": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 200", + "Section 201", + "Section 465", + "Section 471", + "Section 120B" + ], + "124285017": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 450" + ], + "124287551": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 342", + "Section 34" + ], + "124292689": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 364", + "Section 342", + "Section 148", + "Section 506" + ], + "124984148": [ + "Section 186", + "Section 353", + "Section 324" + ], + "124993667": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 200", + "Section 34", + "Section 109", + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 190", + "Section 120B", + "Section 471" + ], + "1249947": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 364" + ], + "60976133": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "60986059": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 304" + ], + "60994644": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 336", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 427", + "Section 397", + "Section 302", + "Section 384", + "Section 392" + ], + "1927945": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 34", + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 326", + "Section 147" + ], + "192797": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 325", + "Section 324", + "Section 147", + "Section 448", + "Section 323" + ], + "192804011": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 415", + "Section 406", + "Section 34", + "Section 120B", + "Section 482" + ], + "192804044": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 341", + "Section 294" + ], + "142530247": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "142532605": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 307", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "158137593": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "1581377": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 148", + "Section 397", + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 324" + ], + "1581399": [ + "Section 173" + ], + "15814673": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 120B", + "Section 200", + "Section 120" + ], + "1581496": [ + "Section 395", + "Section 190", + "Section 379", + "Section 2" + ], + "158156770": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 34", + "Section 364", + "Section 397" + ], + "158244105": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 468" + ], + "158262378": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 353", + "Section 143", + "Section 506" + ], + "25825685": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 120", + "Section 34" + ], + "258342": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 149", + "Section 173", + "Section 482", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 326" + ], + "25843436": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 304", + "Section 308", + "Section 323", + "Section 107", + "Section 504" + ], + "1500330": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "112593242": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 323", + "Section 376", + "Section 229A", + "Section 504" + ], + "179126073": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 320" + ], + "179128442": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "179130065": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 109", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "87248606": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 498A", + "Section 482", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 320" + ], + "87252910": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 143" + ], + "87271": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 411", + "Section 304" + ], + "86542259": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 509", + "Section 354", + "Section 34" + ], + "865603": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 341" + ], + "46981351": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 326", + "Section 302" + ], + "46991473": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 147", + "Section 471", + "Section 143", + "Section 120B", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 420" + ], + "39907894": [ + "Section 13" + ], + "5036162": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 342" + ], + "503628": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 304", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "503718": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "50395662": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 320" + ], + "50409": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 307" + ], + "179203443": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 307", + "Section 155", + "Section 156", + "Section 504" + ], + "1792225": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "179306322": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 294" + ], + "179313269": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 511", + "Section 506", + "Section 392", + "Section 376", + "Section 323" + ], + "1793176": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 427", + "Section 366", + "Section 417" + ], + "179319904": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 406" + ], + "179335946": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "179336": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 438", + "Section 437" + ], + "803110": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 323" + ], + "80311707": [ + "Section 389" + ], + "87385792": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "87385804": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 307" + ], + "87586337": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 332", + "Section 148", + "Section 186", + "Section 427", + "Section 149", + "Section 337" + ], + "87597151": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 4", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 417" + ], + "87598419": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 143", + "Section 436", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 336", + "Section 332", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 427", + "Section 149" + ], + "87601785": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 420" + ], + "87614058": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 363", + "Section 326", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "8761469": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "8143860": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 419", + "Section 471" + ], + "81439439": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 147" + ], + "814552": [ + "Section 120B" + ], + "69327653": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 380", + "Section 147", + "Section 447", + "Section 498A", + "Section 379", + "Section 323", + "Section 326" + ], + "693505": [ + "Section 161" + ], + "693512": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 299" + ], + "39498679": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 365", + "Section 506" + ], + "39500302": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "411059": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 149", + "Section 304" + ], + "411254": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "411403": [ + "Section 2", + "Section 173", + "Section 506", + "Section 342", + "Section 420", + "Section 326", + "Section 465", + "Section 120B", + "Section 201", + "Section 417", + "Section 307", + "Section 190", + "Section 4" + ], + "71373551": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 482", + "Section 468", + "Section 156", + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 471", + "Section 465", + "Section 467" + ], + "71376963": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 482", + "Section 406", + "Section 498A", + "Section 320" + ], + "71382221": [ + "Section 279", + "Section 304A", + "Section 338" + ], + "714024": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 411", + "Section 114", + "Section 471" + ], + "708222": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "708412": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 186" + ], + "110615003": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 366" + ], + "1106493": [ + "Section 193" + ], + "110660903": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 437", + "Section 34" + ], + "110664838": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "111004219": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 467" + ], + "111020052": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 294" + ], + "111032156": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B" + ], + "111109": [ + "Section 500" + ], + "111113255": [ + "Section 337", + "Section 294", + "Section 34", + "Section 336" + ], + "111122283": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506" + ], + "111148672": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 190", + "Section 155" + ], + "11115": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506" + ], + "111157": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 353", + "Section 380" + ], + "1111632": [ + "Section 161" + ], + "11117904": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A" + ], + "1111881": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 304", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 149" + ], + "98052466": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 323", + "Section 366A" + ], + "980588": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 338", + "Section 337", + "Section 279", + "Section 336" + ], + "1500783": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 376" + ], + "150165677": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "150176852": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "150180971": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 336", + "Section 294" + ], + "150184861": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "182576407": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 324", + "Section 307" + ], + "174923742": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "174926773": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "175649445": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 506", + "Section 109", + "Section 364", + "Section 365", + "Section 406", + "Section 467", + "Section 201", + "Section 120", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 468" + ], + "175668349": [ + "Section 200", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 190", + "Section 504" + ], + "183638314": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 448", + "Section 506", + "Section 313", + "Section 325" + ], + "1836437": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 436", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 149" + ], + "184091776": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "184097177": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 376", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "184118019": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 506" + ], + "1841225": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 409", + "Section 415", + "Section 34", + "Section 190", + "Section 193", + "Section 155", + "Section 156" + ], + "184132490": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 4" + ], + "184134654": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 341" + ], + "184145754": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 148" + ], + "184149196": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 5" + ], + "178520417": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 323" + ], + "178834573": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 304" + ], + "17897814": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 34" + ], + "199327297": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 34", + "Section 307" + ], + "1993410": [ + "Section 161" + ], + "199343314": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 307" + ], + "195105134": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "1951412": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 482" + ], + "94389777": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A" + ], + "94391547": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 34", + "Section 341" + ], + "89938542": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 300" + ], + "89938899": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 324", + "Section 448", + "Section 506", + "Section 511" + ], + "89947931": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 415", + "Section 406" + ], + "86747452": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "86748865": [ + "Section 511", + "Section 379" + ], + "86683359": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 320" + ], + "867201": [ + "Section 149" + ], + "86758965": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "867614": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 326", + "Section 148", + "Section 34" + ], + "867804": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 304B", + "Section 34", + "Section 306" + ], + "867890": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 201", + "Section 341", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "86790386": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 326", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 149" + ], + "43663953": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "43723742": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "43724230": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 427", + "Section 307", + "Section 353", + "Section 188" + ], + "43731": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "437434": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 164", + "Section 323", + "Section 376", + "Section 147", + "Section 302" + ], + "198384308": [ + "Section 511", + "Section 323", + "Section 376", + "Section 448", + "Section 506", + "Section 120B" + ], + "162495226": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 323", + "Section 307", + "Section 341", + "Section 354", + "Section 325", + "Section 506" + ], + "162523360": [ + "Section 120", + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 364", + "Section 394", + "Section 397" + ], + "119112540": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 394", + "Section 379", + "Section 323" + ], + "118475730": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 395", + "Section 148", + "Section 332", + "Section 336", + "Section 109", + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 353", + "Section 174A", + "Section 341", + "Section 436", + "Section 147", + "Section 229A" + ], + "91908958": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 438" + ], + "919104": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302" + ], + "91916847": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 427" + ], + "919209": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 326", + "Section 325" + ], + "91921359": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 326", + "Section 323", + "Section 307", + "Section 34" + ], + "91927265": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 294" + ], + "92638458": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "1007294": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "10074526": [ + "Section 511", + "Section 34" + ], + "100752582": [ + "Section 457", + "Section 354" + ], + "245334": [ + "Section 500", + "Section 406" + ], + "245392": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107" + ], + "248535": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 364", + "Section 366", + "Section 363" + ], + "2485963": [ + "Section 143", + "Section 186", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 332", + "Section 323", + "Section 325" + ], + "24862005": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 120B", + "Section 376", + "Section 366", + "Section 109", + "Section 366A", + "Section 326", + "Section 34" + ], + "248677": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 392", + "Section 397" + ], + "24881179": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 120" + ], + "77365324": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "773839": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 294" + ], + "773902": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 313", + "Section 161" + ], + "1315452": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 307", + "Section 299" + ], + "116225116": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 397", + "Section 120" + ], + "116225443": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 34" + ], + "116232239": [ + "Section 5", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 323", + "Section 366A" + ], + "1107832": [ + "Section 161" + ], + "1108366": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 148" + ], + "111068546": [ + "Section 5", + "Section 437" + ], + "111250662": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 143" + ], + "116265485": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "116273532": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 420" + ], + "116275329": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 34" + ], + "170251498": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 506" + ], + "148019564": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "148029796": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 457" + ], + "145898423": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 308", + "Section 324", + "Section 34" + ], + "153199978": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 34" + ], + "153203747": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 406", + "Section 120B", + "Section 420" + ], + "36582504": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 320" + ], + "36584306": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A" + ], + "365868": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 471" + ], + "366037": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 375", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 511", + "Section 354" + ], + "95219503": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 34" + ], + "1618272": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 4", + "Section 342", + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "161837152": [ + "Section 332", + "Section 394" + ], + "161893077": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "155072546": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107", + "Section 34" + ], + "1551040": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "155173901": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "56544944": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "565474": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 326", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 324" + ], + "56578737": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 437", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "1010851": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 304" + ], + "182295200": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 148", + "Section 308", + "Section 427", + "Section 147", + "Section 320", + "Section 341" + ], + "182317916": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 427", + "Section 332", + "Section 336", + "Section 353", + "Section 143", + "Section 147" + ], + "766548": [ + "Section 320", + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 427", + "Section 294", + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 323", + "Section 482", + "Section 506", + "Section 147" + ], + "133623544": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "133625531": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 299", + "Section 304", + "Section 302" + ], + "185199686": [ + "Section 13", + "Section 120", + "Section 342", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 506" + ], + "185199833": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "1980241": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 325", + "Section 482", + "Section 155", + "Section 397", + "Section 120B", + "Section 148", + "Section 173" + ], + "1863953": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 376" + ], + "18639780": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 307", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 300" + ], + "186411094": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 365", + "Section 34", + "Section 438" + ], + "186418": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 34", + "Section 448" + ], + "186319054": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 307", + "Section 326", + "Section 164" + ], + "166533905": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 411", + "Section 392" + ], + "166542700": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107" + ], + "166557142": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 420" + ], + "138509747": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "55074321": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 498" + ], + "55113453": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 186", + "Section 324", + "Section 353", + "Section 326" + ], + "1211794": [ + "Section 395", + "Section 397", + "Section 161" + ], + "1672414": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "167259362": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 332", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 149", + "Section 186" + ], + "82820187": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "828299": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "82839995": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 419" + ], + "828417": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 452", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 147" + ], + "181623956": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 409", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 465", + "Section 419", + "Section 107", + "Section 406", + "Section 468", + "Section 3", + "Section 417" + ], + "181634738": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 354", + "Section 3" + ], + "149216544": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 147", + "Section 336", + "Section 148", + "Section 294", + "Section 341", + "Section 324" + ], + "1492327": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 120B", + "Section 156" + ], + "172516680": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 326", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "172551560": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 366A", + "Section 365", + "Section 363" + ], + "172551915": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "1725542": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "1725669": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 304", + "Section 324" + ], + "172567367": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "1459317": [ + "Section 500", + "Section 406" + ], + "145942608": [ + "Section 500", + "Section 200" + ], + "16551": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 161", + "Section 34", + "Section 420" + ], + "165513": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "165514890": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 342", + "Section 323", + "Section 341", + "Section 324" + ], + "165525513": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 437" + ], + "1928825": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1928844": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 471" + ], + "192887278": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 392", + "Section 365", + "Section 120B" + ], + "1928904": [ + "Section 465", + "Section 406", + "Section 511", + "Section 468" + ], + "695152": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 148" + ], + "69524557": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 506" + ], + "695314": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 302", + "Section 397", + "Section 380" + ], + "6954764": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 411", + "Section 120B" + ], + "69555787": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120B" + ], + "93691825": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "937017": [ + "Section 494", + "Section 109" + ], + "93706021": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 354", + "Section 2" + ], + "93707122": [ + "Section 107", + "Section 294" + ], + "93724460": [ + "Section 389" + ], + "175420445": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "137367729": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 504", + "Section 147" + ], + "137369206": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 302", + "Section 498A" + ], + "745948": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "74601989": [ + "Section 143", + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 186", + "Section 34" + ], + "746045": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 465", + "Section 419", + "Section 467", + "Section 109", + "Section 156", + "Section 173", + "Section 193", + "Section 164", + "Section 190" + ], + "746589": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 304" + ], + "74663796": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 323" + ], + "746652": [ + "Section 363" + ], + "74673120": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "746811": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 326", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "74687420": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 498A", + "Section 506" + ], + "66125080": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 149" + ], + "66128717": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 406" + ], + "66137617": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 506" + ], + "67039787": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "67046983": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 300" + ], + "67051305": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 341", + "Section 448", + "Section 379", + "Section 392" + ], + "670725": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "6708023": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 448", + "Section 354" + ], + "67091095": [ + "Section 365", + "Section 34", + "Section 438" + ], + "67094759": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 448", + "Section 120", + "Section 332", + "Section 353", + "Section 397", + "Section 379", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "67110223": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 506" + ], + "662142": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "66228803": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "662328": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 452", + "Section 323", + "Section 149" + ], + "66233865": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 465", + "Section 468" + ], + "66241319": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "662440": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 320" + ], + "71059911": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 342" + ], + "71071894": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 308", + "Section 420", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 380", + "Section 379" + ], + "710779": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 376" + ], + "71079926": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 341", + "Section 324", + "Section 109", + "Section 336", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 427", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 143" + ], + "710846": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 147", + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 354", + "Section 148" + ], + "98846239": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 120B" + ], + "98848981": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323" + ], + "9885219": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 326" + ], + "98859146": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "73361705": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 341", + "Section 3", + "Section 354" + ], + "73379827": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "893497": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 482" + ], + "89350652": [ + "Section 2", + "Section 411", + "Section 107", + "Section 364", + "Section 3", + "Section 201", + "Section 397" + ], + "89365102": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 326", + "Section 307", + "Section 504", + "Section 324" + ], + "89365178": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 411" + ], + "551398": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 313", + "Section 307" + ], + "55149716": [ + "Section 120", + "Section 465" + ], + "412473": [ + "Section 500" + ], + "64072898": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 415", + "Section 155", + "Section 120B", + "Section 156" + ], + "645388": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "64544363": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 395", + "Section 397" + ], + "64544991": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 299" + ], + "645584": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 4", + "Section 5" + ], + "23063779": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A" + ], + "230867": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 279" + ], + "230938": [ + "Section 190", + "Section 173", + "Section 200", + "Section 448", + "Section 506", + "Section 156" + ], + "176989482": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 506", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 468" + ], + "17700017": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 34" + ], + "140767017": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 13", + "Section 409", + "Section 2" + ], + "140777270": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 427", + "Section 294", + "Section 452", + "Section 506" + ], + "1416450": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 380" + ], + "141654902": [ + "Section 365", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "23781183": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 120B", + "Section 148", + "Section 149" + ], + "23791354": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 468" + ], + "6053807": [ + "Section 363" + ], + "60538460": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 308", + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 341" + ], + "605387": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 420", + "Section 190", + "Section 200", + "Section 468", + "Section 302", + "Section 419" + ], + "6054181": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 326", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 143", + "Section 447" + ], + "60543809": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 109" + ], + "60548474": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 498A" + ], + "60548682": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 376" + ], + "60549437": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 504", + "Section 498A" + ], + "135995101": [ + "Section 384", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 324" + ], + "1360030": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "136015372": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 509" + ], + "138547722": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 120B" + ], + "138549372": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 457" + ], + "138550809": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 506" + ], + "1385727": [ + "Section 228" + ], + "14008802": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 354" + ], + "140088951": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 324" + ], + "1400981": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "140102524": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406" + ], + "1358922": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 342" + ], + "135901281": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 448", + "Section 506", + "Section 308", + "Section 34", + "Section 325" + ], + "1359052": [ + "Section 465", + "Section 471" + ], + "135915732": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 511" + ], + "989287": [ + "Section 338", + "Section 324" + ], + "98942": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 307" + ], + "98952807": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "119995242": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "1200040": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "428967": [ + "Section 494", + "Section 109", + "Section 2" + ], + "42900055": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 438" + ], + "83947360": [ + "Section 363" + ], + "84918966": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 120B" + ], + "84919233": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 294" + ], + "84951255": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "84954323": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 2", + "Section 420", + "Section 34" + ], + "8495525": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 342", + "Section 147", + "Section 149" + ], + "84955997": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302" + ], + "849571": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 304", + "Section 107", + "Section 397" + ], + "84968235": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "1070064": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 392", + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 394" + ], + "1070116": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "107014449": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "107017819": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 308", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 324", + "Section 427", + "Section 147", + "Section 323" + ], + "107024311": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 320" + ], + "107033957": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 465", + "Section 468", + "Section 471" + ], + "1797027": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "73906380": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 498A" + ], + "73907595": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 279", + "Section 337", + "Section 338" + ], + "73908150": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 465", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B" + ], + "73941": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "740448": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 13" + ], + "74062806": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "57940745": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302" + ], + "579514": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 304", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "57968476": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "123575920": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 34", + "Section 506" + ], + "123591123": [ + "Section 164" + ], + "123599697": [ + "Section 389" + ], + "123605674": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 155", + "Section 120B", + "Section 156" + ], + "4811535": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107" + ], + "48124988": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 452", + "Section 397", + "Section 392" + ], + "481265": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 498A", + "Section 323" + ], + "48149563": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "48152949": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 376", + "Section 363" + ], + "1568202": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 302" + ], + "156822347": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 506", + "Section 164", + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 511", + "Section 376", + "Section 354" + ], + "1686451": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 302" + ], + "1686526": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 304" + ], + "168672861": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 320", + "Section 34" + ], + "1686794": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "168680071": [ + "Section 299", + "Section 397" + ], + "1688820": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 107" + ], + "168915449": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1106872": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 498" + ], + "110698826": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 320", + "Section 34" + ], + "78377690": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 354", + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 326", + "Section 186", + "Section 307", + "Section 332" + ], + "783786": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 409", + "Section 420" + ], + "78380344": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "78384872": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 342" + ], + "783854": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467", + "Section 409", + "Section 406" + ], + "78400448": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 186" + ], + "78409161": [ + "Section 2", + "Section 4", + "Section 3", + "Section 34" + ], + "78411085": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B" + ], + "784194": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 366", + "Section 147" + ], + "78427042": [ + "Section 409" + ], + "1619703": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 148", + "Section 34" + ], + "159915": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 342", + "Section 302" + ], + "132183332": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 228", + "Section 5", + "Section 406", + "Section 471", + "Section 419", + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 506", + "Section 120", + "Section 161", + "Section 384" + ], + "132183474": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 427", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 337", + "Section 448" + ], + "132185": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "132187518": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304", + "Section 306", + "Section 302", + "Section 325", + "Section 308" + ], + "3845970": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 294", + "Section 376", + "Section 148" + ], + "384665": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 143", + "Section 148", + "Section 354" + ], + "384703": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 161", + "Section 164" + ], + "12241637": [ + "Section 193" + ], + "1224357": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 394", + "Section 302" + ], + "119894847": [ + "Section 228", + "Section 342", + "Section 376" + ], + "119899023": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 325" + ], + "107532763": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 294" + ], + "430198": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 156", + "Section 200" + ], + "4302712": [ + "Section 149" + ], + "43029740": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 193", + "Section 420" + ], + "43036892": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 506", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 342", + "Section 420", + "Section 354", + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A", + "Section 120B", + "Section 201", + "Section 411", + "Section 379", + "Section 504" + ], + "84831065": [ + "Section 164" + ], + "84852056": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 353", + "Section 438", + "Section 34", + "Section 186" + ], + "84856097": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "84350825": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 337", + "Section 279", + "Section 338", + "Section 304" + ], + "84357433": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 120B", + "Section 482" + ], + "84362773": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 120B", + "Section 109", + "Section 148" + ], + "158787276": [ + "Section 5", + "Section 294" + ], + "15880": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 302", + "Section 107", + "Section 34", + "Section 307" + ], + "158805220": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "158835647": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "1330737": [ + "Section 419", + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 471", + "Section 482", + "Section 468", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34" + ], + "133084508": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "32698388": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 323", + "Section 300", + "Section 147", + "Section 324", + "Section 304", + "Section 506", + "Section 307" + ], + "32704": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420" + ], + "32704783": [ + "Section 397" + ], + "32705683": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 325" + ], + "32709323": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "190363471": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 120B" + ], + "1903657": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 120B", + "Section 337", + "Section 109" + ], + "1903722": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 3", + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 397" + ], + "190384606": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1453291": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 173", + "Section 302", + "Section 306", + "Section 156", + "Section 2", + "Section 120B" + ], + "145331283": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "1453430": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 304", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 147" + ], + "145351026": [ + "Section 375", + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "145353146": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 325" + ], + "79373635": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 397", + "Section 392" + ], + "793800": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 452", + "Section 427", + "Section 336", + "Section 342", + "Section 354", + "Section 420", + "Section 155", + "Section 482", + "Section 156", + "Section 161", + "Section 147", + "Section 308" + ], + "793879": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 353", + "Section 324", + "Section 120B", + "Section 506", + "Section 342", + "Section 34", + "Section 109", + "Section 365" + ], + "79400948": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 307", + "Section 341", + "Section 147" + ], + "79446364": [ + "Section 13", + "Section 120" + ], + "79459107": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "58057578": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 438" + ], + "630486": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 3", + "Section 4" + ], + "63051": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "63057146": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 279" + ], + "173946247": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 448", + "Section 354", + "Section 307" + ], + "173946272": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "58851195": [ + "Section 13", + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467" + ], + "588646": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 326", + "Section 325" + ], + "58864993": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 34", + "Section 506" + ], + "58874388": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 406", + "Section 342" + ], + "588753": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "55659486": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 306", + "Section 34", + "Section 364", + "Section 365", + "Section 307", + "Section 498A", + "Section 313" + ], + "55659656": [ + "Section 148" + ], + "55668308": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "49880468": [ + "Section 156", + "Section 354", + "Section 323", + "Section 452", + "Section 504", + "Section 506" + ], + "499015": [ + "Section 164", + "Section 302" + ], + "56653677": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 409", + "Section 34", + "Section 379" + ], + "120013265": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 376", + "Section 482", + "Section 228" + ], + "1200189": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 307", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 353" + ], + "120019200": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 379", + "Section 354", + "Section 34" + ], + "1200243": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 161", + "Section 341", + "Section 409", + "Section 109", + "Section 420", + "Section 467" + ], + "178183108": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 438", + "Section 379", + "Section 34" + ], + "178196359": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "178200896": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 384", + "Section 307", + "Section 427", + "Section 397", + "Section 326", + "Section 392", + "Section 336" + ], + "178205582": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "178206978": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 511" + ], + "1782216": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 376", + "Section 304" + ], + "178306122": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482" + ], + "903619": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 302", + "Section 397", + "Section 341" + ], + "90370604": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 506" + ], + "190057857": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 306" + ], + "190062526": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "189125383": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 397" + ], + "312474": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 201", + "Section 114", + "Section 302" + ], + "31250503": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 366", + "Section 363" + ], + "402203": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 147" + ], + "40220458": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 320", + "Section 467", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 307", + "Section 120B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 482", + "Section 34" + ], + "4022215": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 437" + ], + "402230": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 302", + "Section 161", + "Section 313" + ], + "117176614": [ + "Section 120", + "Section 415", + "Section 406", + "Section 34", + "Section 420" + ], + "117183076": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 364", + "Section 342", + "Section 148", + "Section 506" + ], + "156872511": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 397", + "Section 302" + ], + "1568770": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "156885357": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 452", + "Section 34", + "Section 427" + ], + "1568874": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 120B" + ], + "13366598": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 306" + ], + "1336790": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "13369090": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 379", + "Section 147" + ], + "13382145": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 143" + ], + "13384129": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 363" + ], + "138173": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 448", + "Section 394", + "Section 161" + ], + "138282093": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "138392167": [ + "Section 174A" + ], + "138575974": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 364", + "Section 302", + "Section 193" + ], + "138678850": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 120", + "Section 147", + "Section 342" + ], + "133870446": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 436" + ], + "1338727": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 326" + ], + "1338851": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 161", + "Section 34" + ], + "13390287": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 34", + "Section 120B", + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "133911239": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 354", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 450", + "Section 120B", + "Section 506", + "Section 156", + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 452", + "Section 504" + ], + "133917698": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 3", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "133918384": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "1053844": [ + "Section 366" + ], + "102947334": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 504", + "Section 325" + ], + "102953123": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 306", + "Section 504", + "Section 498A" + ], + "102953153": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 397", + "Section 279" + ], + "102954643": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420" + ], + "76536960": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "76152895": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "76174693": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "81536526": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "81550909": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 427", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 326", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "40268201": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 342", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 307" + ], + "40281284": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "40291216": [ + "Section 186", + "Section 332", + "Section 353", + "Section 437" + ], + "40293556": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 409", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 120B", + "Section 13", + "Section 389" + ], + "48152981": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 306", + "Section 147" + ], + "4825264": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 504", + "Section 34", + "Section 304", + "Section 299" + ], + "40649889": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "40665836": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "40668500": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 34", + "Section 324" + ], + "94924415": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 34", + "Section 448", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 323", + "Section 354", + "Section 504" + ], + "94930402": [ + "Section 389" + ], + "94942169": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "949443": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 417", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "1741063": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 149" + ], + "1741075": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 120B", + "Section 147", + "Section 148" + ], + "174123277": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 436", + "Section 427", + "Section 326", + "Section 120B", + "Section 307", + "Section 201" + ], + "85417674": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 324" + ], + "85447600": [ + "Section 395" + ], + "186127959": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 450" + ], + "186131347": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "186139630": [ + "Section 229A" + ], + "186150667": [ + "Section 395", + "Section 427", + "Section 342", + "Section 394", + "Section 450", + "Section 341", + "Section 452", + "Section 392", + "Section 397" + ], + "1859088": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 338" + ], + "185921652": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 411" + ], + "56674017": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "56680385": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 34" + ], + "566829": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 427", + "Section 120" + ], + "102417423": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 436", + "Section 148", + "Section 395", + "Section 302", + "Section 427", + "Section 201", + "Section 437", + "Section 188", + "Section 143" + ], + "96943411": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 379" + ], + "969489": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 149", + "Section 302" + ], + "969859": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 376", + "Section 366", + "Section 323" + ], + "96986712": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 427", + "Section 506", + "Section 294", + "Section 324", + "Section 3", + "Section 341" + ], + "152532108": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "248970": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 4" + ], + "522759": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 353", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 186", + "Section 307" + ], + "52277421": [ + "Section 447", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 452" + ], + "52297473": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "198500164": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "198508966": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 161", + "Section 376", + "Section 366" + ], + "1985195": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 147", + "Section 325", + "Section 336", + "Section 323" + ], + "109386549": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 376" + ], + "1094063": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 417", + "Section 375" + ], + "108767252": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 506" + ], + "145964721": [ + "Section 417", + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "128850604": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107" + ], + "128859023": [ + "Section 457", + "Section 3" + ], + "28354267": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 498A", + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 320" + ], + "28355071": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 342" + ], + "28363673": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 5", + "Section 427", + "Section 120B" + ], + "28387759": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 325", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 326", + "Section 294" + ], + "36137065": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 450", + "Section 375" + ], + "28165694": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 326" + ], + "27805342": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 120" + ], + "27810290": [ + "Section 156", + "Section 468", + "Section 471" + ], + "110546891": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 201", + "Section 498A", + "Section 498" + ], + "110551838": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1885255": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 302", + "Section 306", + "Section 498A", + "Section 313" + ], + "188545397": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 323" + ], + "153654": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "1536615": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 302" + ], + "1547491": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 304", + "Section 279" + ], + "154758747": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 201", + "Section 193", + "Section 307" + ], + "154771324": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "154773154": [ + "Section 320", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1547754": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 326" + ], + "154776112": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 313", + "Section 164" + ], + "63853511": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 427", + "Section 354", + "Section 448", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "63868536": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 294" + ], + "179573896": [ + "Section 229A" + ], + "179589": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 300" + ], + "179589761": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 376", + "Section 304B", + "Section 417" + ], + "179957696": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 376" + ], + "176925927": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 394", + "Section 379" + ], + "176936089": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 294" + ], + "176938": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 302", + "Section 156", + "Section 482", + "Section 190", + "Section 200", + "Section 147", + "Section 148" + ], + "12775645": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 323" + ], + "1277706": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 365", + "Section 149" + ], + "130071407": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 294", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 326" + ], + "130072459": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1300742": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "130074314": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306" + ], + "1300810": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 149" + ], + "127836092": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 417", + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 409", + "Section 109", + "Section 120", + "Section 354", + "Section 509", + "Section 384", + "Section 376" + ], + "127842650": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323" + ], + "1278610": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 332" + ], + "6143889": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 380" + ], + "614517": [ + "Section 395", + "Section 450", + "Section 34", + "Section 149", + "Section 5" + ], + "61467032": [ + "Section 498A" + ], + "82089984": [ + "Section 164", + "Section 120B", + "Section 326", + "Section 427", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "821011": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 307" + ], + "25362956": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 323", + "Section 304B", + "Section 313", + "Section 506" + ], + "253695": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 304" + ], + "108835355": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1088697": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "108884865": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 34", + "Section 304" + ], + "1088892": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 34", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467", + "Section 200" + ], + "104064709": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "104076171": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304" + ], + "1042335": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1042412": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 465" + ], + "975026": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "94847943": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 307", + "Section 4", + "Section 34" + ], + "94860131": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 394", + "Section 482" + ], + "192654917": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 188", + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "193411084": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 376", + "Section 366A", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 120" + ], + "1934141": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "193433171": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 427", + "Section 323", + "Section 482" + ], + "52366358": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 468", + "Section 467" + ], + "523861": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "52412855": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 147", + "Section 338", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 186", + "Section 427", + "Section 326", + "Section 149", + "Section 332" + ], + "52432626": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 437" + ], + "198117": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "198120050": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376" + ], + "198121083": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 376" + ], + "198131571": [ + "Section 120B" + ], + "198131822": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 304", + "Section 302" + ], + "197768066": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120", + "Section 506", + "Section 228", + "Section 188", + "Section 186" + ], + "197776856": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "197778138": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 302" + ], + "1977850": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 34" + ], + "198683746": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 332", + "Section 341" + ], + "198686579": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 482", + "Section 342", + "Section 308", + "Section 498A", + "Section 406" + ], + "198711121": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 325", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 302" + ], + "1993875": [ + "Section 308", + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 323" + ], + "199393734": [ + "Section 173", + "Section 306", + "Section 302" + ], + "199403018": [ + "Section 308", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "199406200": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 498A", + "Section 302" + ], + "165983737": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 419", + "Section 406", + "Section 420" + ], + "50427847": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 174A", + "Section 465", + "Section 229A" + ], + "5894127": [ + "Section 155", + "Section 156", + "Section 482", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 308", + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "589459": [ + "Section 161" + ], + "589473": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "51044443": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 5", + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 4", + "Section 366A", + "Section 366", + "Section 306", + "Section 325", + "Section 320", + "Section 3" + ], + "51047132": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 354", + "Section 406", + "Section 498A" + ], + "46417660": [ + "Section 320", + "Section 326" + ], + "46429623": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294" + ], + "46436123": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 307", + "Section 325" + ], + "464390": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 114" + ], + "46526005": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 34" + ], + "90176985": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 326", + "Section 307", + "Section 504", + "Section 324" + ], + "17035219": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 2" + ], + "17035365": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 338", + "Section 279" + ], + "1703559": [ + "Section 304A" + ], + "1703737": [ + "Section 436", + "Section 149", + "Section 325", + "Section 34", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 326", + "Section 323", + "Section 307", + "Section 394", + "Section 324", + "Section 320" + ], + "1703810": [ + "Section 313", + "Section 120", + "Section 506", + "Section 376" + ], + "1957166": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 325", + "Section 304", + "Section 323" + ], + "195719577": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 323", + "Section 427" + ], + "1314858": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 354", + "Section 375", + "Section 417", + "Section 511" + ], + "160523602": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 509", + "Section 406", + "Section 506" + ], + "160531413": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 467" + ], + "160536321": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 307" + ], + "160542249": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "160543666": [ + "Section 384", + "Section 376", + "Section 325" + ], + "1179931": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 120B", + "Section 336", + "Section 342", + "Section 114", + "Section 304", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 109" + ], + "1179936": [ + "Section 304B" + ], + "194445035": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 323", + "Section 427", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 353" + ], + "121580525": [ + "Section 107", + "Section 306", + "Section 506", + "Section 504" + ], + "121582722": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 114", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 3", + "Section 354" + ], + "121585130": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 506", + "Section 307" + ], + "125502941": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 376", + "Section 5" + ], + "125511667": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 304", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 308" + ], + "125517806": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 471" + ], + "125527130": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 397" + ], + "116754380": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "117200991": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "117202634": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 506", + "Section 342", + "Section 366" + ], + "117212910": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 5", + "Section 417" + ], + "1588763": [ + "Section 190" + ], + "158878966": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 34", + "Section 320", + "Section 294" + ], + "259152": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 302" + ], + "20460": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 186" + ], + "204632": [ + "Section 465", + "Section 342" + ], + "204742": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 120B", + "Section 164", + "Section 120", + "Section 436", + "Section 302" + ], + "20479591": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406" + ], + "20717234": [ + "Section 364", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 465" + ], + "207210": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 300", + "Section 504", + "Section 304" + ], + "55699939": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "1151173": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "1786180": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 4", + "Section 120B", + "Section 161", + "Section 465" + ], + "1786230": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "178640299": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "178658948": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 307", + "Section 120B", + "Section 379", + "Section 34" + ], + "94600312": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 498A", + "Section 324", + "Section 304B", + "Section 498" + ], + "9460418": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 406", + "Section 482", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 320" + ], + "983691": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "9839712": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "9300610": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "931879": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 324" + ], + "9347": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 324", + "Section 149", + "Section 326", + "Section 302" + ], + "500929": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 201", + "Section 2" + ], + "50098930": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 308", + "Section 341" + ], + "50099440": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 34" + ], + "50105448": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "50107352": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 34" + ], + "127679180": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 506" + ], + "127696490": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 498", + "Section 306" + ], + "127405": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "127426": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B" + ], + "75111153": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 34", + "Section 438", + "Section 376" + ], + "75131898": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 5", + "Section 354", + "Section 3", + "Section 109", + "Section 376", + "Section 375", + "Section 313" + ], + "14803111": [ + "Section 384", + "Section 342", + "Section 323" + ], + "1480370": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "148038951": [ + "Section 114", + "Section 509", + "Section 506" + ], + "14804516": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 342", + "Section 394" + ], + "148053689": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "148057678": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 304A" + ], + "148077875": [ + "Section 389", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 149", + "Section 120B", + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 392", + "Section 304", + "Section 34" + ], + "148096266": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 155", + "Section 156" + ], + "1035012": [ + "Section 2", + "Section 34", + "Section 384" + ], + "12968913": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 397", + "Section 341", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 336", + "Section 392", + "Section 427" + ], + "313411": [ + "Section 436", + "Section 302", + "Section 161", + "Section 149", + "Section 452", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 427", + "Section 325" + ], + "313430": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 452", + "Section 324", + "Section 120B", + "Section 149", + "Section 448", + "Section 323" + ], + "313645": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 147", + "Section 384", + "Section 353", + "Section 143", + "Section 506", + "Section 148" + ], + "31369009": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 420" + ], + "294497": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 120B" + ], + "29450347": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "294605": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 375", + "Section 511", + "Section 354" + ], + "29470486": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "170457266": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 34", + "Section 148", + "Section 120B", + "Section 307", + "Section 114", + "Section 147" + ], + "160199760": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 417", + "Section 164", + "Section 438" + ], + "16026000": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 308", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "160261636": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 341", + "Section 326" + ], + "160275618": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 325" + ], + "160284446": [ + "Section 511", + "Section 506", + "Section 376" + ], + "183439353": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 120B", + "Section 482", + "Section 173", + "Section 467" + ], + "183441040": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 294", + "Section 452", + "Section 302" + ], + "182980886": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 363", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 366" + ], + "182987998": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1829923": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 306", + "Section 107" + ], + "50835453": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 353", + "Section 120" + ], + "50851713": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 114", + "Section 509", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 326" + ], + "1957485": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "141660": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 304", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 300", + "Section 147", + "Section 504", + "Section 307" + ], + "1416918": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 427", + "Section 332" + ], + "141696444": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 308", + "Section 353", + "Section 34" + ], + "69686776": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 427", + "Section 384", + "Section 149", + "Section 506", + "Section 147", + "Section 143", + "Section 148" + ], + "697058": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 448", + "Section 323", + "Section 148" + ], + "69708147": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 420" + ], + "109477772": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 420" + ], + "109483591": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 363" + ], + "109488033": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 307" + ], + "117689013": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 427", + "Section 332", + "Section 109", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 143", + "Section 147", + "Section 395", + "Section 420", + "Section 353" + ], + "1799677": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 313", + "Section 120B" + ], + "177334237": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 452", + "Section 34" + ], + "1773448": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 380" + ], + "139487808": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "139500260": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "1395040": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 34" + ], + "139506109": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 304A", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 326", + "Section 325", + "Section 307", + "Section 353" + ], + "21307178": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 4", + "Section 324", + "Section 354" + ], + "213129": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323" + ], + "21317024": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 164", + "Section 34" + ], + "21324800": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 420" + ], + "1262971": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 511" + ], + "126304157": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 294", + "Section 201" + ], + "120845431": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 304B", + "Section 107" + ], + "120873498": [ + "Section 452" + ], + "1208758": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 394", + "Section 34", + "Section 411", + "Section 392" + ], + "845393": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 500" + ], + "84546581": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 325", + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 332", + "Section 148", + "Section 186" + ], + "84557894": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 363" + ], + "845751": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 326", + "Section 201", + "Section 307" + ], + "8112": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 149", + "Section 304", + "Section 300" + ], + "81154336": [ + "Section 389" + ], + "81201524": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 420" + ], + "156383456": [ + "Section 308", + "Section 338" + ], + "143449940": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304", + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A", + "Section 506", + "Section 304B", + "Section 504", + "Section 323" + ], + "82115817": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 306" + ], + "109886946": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 304" + ], + "109926599": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 506", + "Section 376" + ], + "10992775": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 509", + "Section 324", + "Section 325" + ], + "104669998": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107", + "Section 504", + "Section 482" + ], + "104866570": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 376", + "Section 306", + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "104922981": [ + "Section 229A" + ], + "1049847": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 437", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "47568148": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 306" + ], + "47572432": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 307", + "Section 341", + "Section 438" + ], + "124996869": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 302" + ], + "125003793": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 417", + "Section 420", + "Section 155", + "Section 156" + ], + "126243348": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 384" + ], + "12651519": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 438" + ], + "196877452": [ + "Section 300" + ], + "196882902": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 504", + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 379", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "196883091": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 420" + ], + "197233536": [ + "Section 13" + ], + "1972359": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 376", + "Section 366A", + "Section 506" + ], + "197237300": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 306", + "Section 107" + ], + "139653985": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 120B", + "Section 468", + "Section 325" + ], + "139657730": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 397", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 324", + "Section 342", + "Section 436" + ], + "13966651": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 304", + "Section 376" + ], + "139675430": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 448", + "Section 307", + "Section 354", + "Section 325" + ], + "13968029": [ + "Section 229A" + ], + "93134454": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 302" + ], + "76309565": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 394", + "Section 34", + "Section 392" + ], + "76333831": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 427", + "Section 324", + "Section 363", + "Section 302" + ], + "7633654": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "342532": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 325" + ], + "34260943": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 392", + "Section 380", + "Section 457", + "Section 379" + ], + "34275602": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 302" + ], + "34279486": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 506" + ], + "34879891": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "34880842": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 336", + "Section 353" + ], + "33587012": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "180067": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 114", + "Section 34" + ], + "134594073": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 294" + ], + "134598": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 313", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 161" + ], + "134603568": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107" + ], + "134604414": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 511" + ], + "134608353": [ + "Section 494", + "Section 406", + "Section 498A", + "Section 506" + ], + "180630321": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 448", + "Section 380", + "Section 420" + ], + "1806313": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 148" + ], + "180648286": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "180651613": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 354", + "Section 375", + "Section 511", + "Section 366" + ], + "180668364": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34" + ], + "150541962": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "15054939": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 353", + "Section 427", + "Section 302" + ], + "150550664": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 482", + "Section 320" + ], + "150568105": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 34" + ], + "1505751": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 320", + "Section 420", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 498", + "Section 482", + "Section 452", + "Section 494" + ], + "150577534": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 307", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "1473750": [ + "Section 395", + "Section 397", + "Section 354", + "Section 376" + ], + "1473793": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "1473809": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 511", + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 354", + "Section 34" + ], + "662985": [ + "Section 500", + "Section 417" + ], + "663249": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "30565329": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 323", + "Section 354", + "Section 452", + "Section 498A", + "Section 494", + "Section 161", + "Section 120B", + "Section 324", + "Section 109" + ], + "305700": [ + "Section 494" + ], + "30577298": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 173" + ], + "30582024": [ + "Section 384", + "Section 320" + ], + "30582423": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "3058561": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 353", + "Section 201", + "Section 506", + "Section 188" + ], + "86810890": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "146283283": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 324", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 506" + ], + "1462859": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "41373355": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "41378641": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 147" + ], + "161006120": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 353", + "Section 307" + ], + "161010163": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 354" + ], + "161019063": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 411", + "Section 392", + "Section 34" + ], + "16103225": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 498" + ], + "161046974": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 468", + "Section 34", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 506", + "Section 467" + ], + "16104781": [ + "Section 324" + ], + "1610484": [ + "Section 2", + "Section 379" + ], + "161049909": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "161050465": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 417" + ], + "143377710": [ + "Section 13" + ], + "143383": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 436" + ], + "189173903": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "191700037": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "1922500": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "1924233": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 313" + ], + "189572047": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "189591673": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 447", + "Section 427", + "Section 325", + "Section 143", + "Section 338", + "Section 307" + ], + "1896068": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 417", + "Section 468", + "Section 471" + ], + "106681665": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "106696131": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 147", + "Section 506", + "Section 448", + "Section 323", + "Section 379", + "Section 353" + ], + "32802806": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "3280812": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 34", + "Section 397", + "Section 394" + ], + "32811148": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 504", + "Section 353", + "Section 506", + "Section 332" + ], + "32811530": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 394", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "33146083": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 325", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 323" + ], + "33155374": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 468" + ], + "33164021": [ + "Section 155", + "Section 2", + "Section 190" + ], + "952940": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 380" + ], + "95296001": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 384", + "Section 120B" + ], + "953024": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 376" + ], + "91586920": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 427" + ], + "91595587": [ + "Section 366A", + "Section 120B" + ], + "9159883": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 307" + ], + "91615056": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 406", + "Section 498A" + ], + "91619369": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 500" + ], + "91622997": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "916275": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 149", + "Section 300" + ], + "1908859": [ + "Section 395" + ], + "19090773": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "92201257": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120", + "Section 201" + ], + "92207675": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "92209455": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 34", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 363" + ], + "92210131": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "3583407": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "35852344": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 438" + ], + "358628": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 304" + ], + "35881243": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 3", + "Section 376", + "Section 366" + ], + "1417866": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 341", + "Section 147", + "Section 452", + "Section 120" + ], + "1418118": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 341", + "Section 294" + ], + "1493448": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "149357055": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 392", + "Section 323" + ], + "149378181": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 323" + ], + "149389287": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 437" + ], + "152376402": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 427", + "Section 120B", + "Section 448", + "Section 325", + "Section 34" + ], + "152385498": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 323", + "Section 506" + ], + "1523981": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 420" + ], + "1524025": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B" + ], + "152417319": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 326", + "Section 325", + "Section 324" + ], + "151966294": [ + "Section 417", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "151971451": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 427", + "Section 148", + "Section 332", + "Section 307", + "Section 353", + "Section 147", + "Section 186", + "Section 325" + ], + "151975873": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 438" + ], + "132259800": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 353", + "Section 332" + ], + "1323193": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 120B", + "Section 468", + "Section 409" + ], + "132336627": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 394" + ], + "132343597": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 376" + ], + "132344946": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 34", + "Section 427", + "Section 506", + "Section 448" + ], + "21247780": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "21248637": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 34", + "Section 482", + "Section 326", + "Section 188" + ], + "21254089": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 186", + "Section 438" + ], + "154066442": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363" + ], + "15407172": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 366", + "Section 376", + "Section 307", + "Section 364", + "Section 450" + ], + "1540730": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 304B", + "Section 304" + ], + "62278047": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 201", + "Section 114", + "Section 313" + ], + "62547": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 149", + "Section 148" + ], + "625521": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 304B" + ], + "62554251": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 34" + ], + "6256": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "67751850": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "67756766": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "67762620": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "67768736": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "67891642": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 120B", + "Section 302", + "Section 436", + "Section 323", + "Section 427", + "Section 304", + "Section 452", + "Section 174A", + "Section 3", + "Section 148", + "Section 300", + "Section 395", + "Section 397", + "Section 450", + "Section 325" + ], + "71599361": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 437", + "Section 325", + "Section 308" + ], + "71404566": [ + "Section 409" + ], + "71661721": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 506" + ], + "666067": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "66610669": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 332" + ], + "443204": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 342" + ], + "44320964": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 354", + "Section 506" + ], + "4408073": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 143", + "Section 427", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "126845989": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 193", + "Section 419", + "Section 294", + "Section 173", + "Section 471" + ], + "126857448": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 143", + "Section 506", + "Section 294", + "Section 427", + "Section 384", + "Section 149" + ], + "1268735": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "126903": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "1269032": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 392", + "Section 34", + "Section 342" + ], + "884121": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 302", + "Section 354", + "Section 34" + ], + "88417147": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 376", + "Section 366A", + "Section 375" + ], + "88476380": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 313", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 120B" + ], + "885009": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 324", + "Section 363", + "Section 323", + "Section 109" + ], + "99025582": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 498A", + "Section 307" + ], + "778058": [ + "Section 190", + "Section 200", + "Section 173", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 307", + "Section 394" + ], + "77809039": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 341", + "Section 120", + "Section 148" + ], + "7773396": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 324", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "77735393": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 448", + "Section 323", + "Section 427", + "Section 307" + ], + "7773999": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 420" + ], + "77740099": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 114", + "Section 201" + ], + "777448": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 300" + ], + "77747329": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 324", + "Section 302", + "Section 5" + ], + "79311629": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 120B", + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "79321632": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "26034279": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 366", + "Section 363" + ], + "26045866": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 406", + "Section 498A" + ], + "69011797": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 376" + ], + "69030809": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 354", + "Section 452", + "Section 504", + "Section 323" + ], + "690414": [ + "Section 201" + ], + "1163208": [ + "Section 320", + "Section 406" + ], + "1163239": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "116336059": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "116340930": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 294", + "Section 186" + ], + "77044473": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 411", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 468" + ], + "77054211": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 307" + ], + "770549": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "770612": [ + "Section 313", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 379", + "Section 34" + ], + "173116245": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "171292683": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 506", + "Section 498A", + "Section 438" + ], + "1713351": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 452", + "Section 324", + "Section 397", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 147", + "Section 482" + ], + "169783883": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 120B" + ], + "124613967": [ + "Section 389" + ], + "124621937": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 313", + "Section 504", + "Section 506" + ], + "1244243": [ + "Section 5", + "Section 188" + ], + "124430173": [ + "Section 417", + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "37837750": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 149" + ], + "37843": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 13" + ], + "33384821": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 394" + ], + "33545050": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "338898": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 323" + ], + "339591": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 161", + "Section 34", + "Section 107" + ], + "340104": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 406", + "Section 342" + ], + "5815": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 313", + "Section 465" + ], + "7146298": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 324", + "Section 304", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "71470154": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 341" + ], + "71476424": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 437", + "Section 34" + ], + "71477608": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300" + ], + "71479": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 120B" + ], + "153447569": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 389", + "Section 366" + ], + "113090": [ + "Section 397" + ], + "113102773": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 294" + ], + "1131053": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 379", + "Section 465" + ], + "113108094": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 420" + ], + "182055771": [ + "Section 364", + "Section 323", + "Section 376" + ], + "1820790": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 324", + "Section 120B", + "Section 120", + "Section 34" + ], + "181926248": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 341" + ], + "181928505": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 376" + ], + "181954566": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 156" + ], + "187222059": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 306", + "Section 498A" + ], + "187223156": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "1872270": [ + "Section 363" + ], + "1872341": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "187234367": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "95048305": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 341", + "Section 326", + "Section 325", + "Section 34" + ], + "95066759": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107", + "Section 173", + "Section 34", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "950686": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 313", + "Section 300" + ], + "759656": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 5" + ], + "140807347": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 120" + ], + "140816813": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 509", + "Section 448" + ], + "140870411": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "1408708": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 467", + "Section 411", + "Section 363", + "Section 342", + "Section 457", + "Section 380" + ], + "1408738": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 482" + ], + "1408786": [ + "Section 375", + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 164" + ], + "1408787": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 304", + "Section 313" + ], + "140891030": [ + "Section 465", + "Section 120B", + "Section 188" + ], + "140896100": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 294" + ], + "187616006": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 294" + ], + "187617476": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1760655": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 392", + "Section 394", + "Section 397" + ], + "176086979": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 406", + "Section 506" + ], + "176090458": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 406" + ], + "1758503": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 34", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 307" + ], + "175851329": [ + "Section 229A" + ], + "1758642": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 304", + "Section 149", + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 447", + "Section 307" + ], + "352877": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 326", + "Section 302" + ], + "35291156": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "352946": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "35309856": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 465", + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 380", + "Section 511", + "Section 420" + ], + "35311051": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 437", + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "1388064": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 380", + "Section 415", + "Section 420" + ], + "138822328": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "167443546": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "167599": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 448", + "Section 397" + ], + "167604369": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 436", + "Section 148", + "Section 201", + "Section 427", + "Section 147" + ], + "167608090": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 120B", + "Section 468", + "Section 419", + "Section 201", + "Section 420", + "Section 465", + "Section 406", + "Section 120", + "Section 471", + "Section 467" + ], + "150717761": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 341" + ], + "1507312": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 304A", + "Section 304B" + ], + "150733539": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 306" + ], + "39908942": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 155", + "Section 156", + "Section 406" + ], + "39924700": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 375", + "Section 313", + "Section 354" + ], + "39926083": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 392", + "Section 397", + "Section 380" + ], + "143138831": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "143161195": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 506", + "Section 341" + ], + "143162182": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 509", + "Section 506" + ], + "54081419": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294" + ], + "54144220": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 149", + "Section 323", + "Section 304", + "Section 342", + "Section 452", + "Section 308", + "Section 313" + ], + "541502": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 193" + ], + "111193356": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 188", + "Section 149", + "Section 186" + ], + "111197214": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 149" + ], + "134417429": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 506", + "Section 336", + "Section 341", + "Section 302", + "Section 392", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 397" + ], + "199965324": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "370753": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 452", + "Section 332", + "Section 448", + "Section 120B", + "Section 120", + "Section 482" + ], + "370852": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "74843747": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 376" + ], + "74847342": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "74860134": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 186" + ], + "74734": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 420", + "Section 384", + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 471" + ], + "74735821": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 376", + "Section 147", + "Section 34" + ], + "66566482": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 384" + ], + "66600177": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 120", + "Section 506", + "Section 302", + "Section 324" + ], + "177954124": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 323" + ], + "1779582": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "17796633": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 375", + "Section 363", + "Section 366A", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 366" + ], + "181165607": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 427", + "Section 149", + "Section 325" + ], + "181357397": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 341", + "Section 354", + "Section 304", + "Section 325", + "Section 326" + ], + "181528751": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 341" + ], + "138852795": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B" + ], + "13893211": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 308" + ], + "44436310": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 498" + ], + "1076719": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "107677147": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "64570580": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 5", + "Section 2", + "Section 323" + ], + "64578128": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "6458615": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 406" + ], + "1415397": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 332", + "Section 120B" + ], + "1421422": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "142147317": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 5", + "Section 120B" + ], + "142148431": [ + "Section 395", + "Section 324", + "Section 147", + "Section 354", + "Section 326", + "Section 149", + "Section 427", + "Section 143", + "Section 341" + ], + "1503308": [ + "Section 5", + "Section 4" + ], + "150347342": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 452", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 120B", + "Section 323", + "Section 320", + "Section 504", + "Section 34", + "Section 109" + ], + "150347856": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 417", + "Section 420" + ], + "1498752": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 34" + ], + "807023": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 325", + "Section 148", + "Section 149" + ], + "804369": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 468", + "Section 302" + ], + "71711": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 304B", + "Section 201" + ], + "71719415": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 354", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 34" + ], + "717201": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 467", + "Section 302", + "Section 471", + "Section 394", + "Section 376", + "Section 201", + "Section 109" + ], + "71725324": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 34", + "Section 366A", + "Section 438" + ], + "71736581": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 448", + "Section 323", + "Section 438", + "Section 156" + ], + "193071886": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 438" + ], + "1930822": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 34", + "Section 3" + ], + "104570140": [ + "Section 450", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 376" + ], + "104588342": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 366" + ], + "1148918": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 304" + ], + "1591771": [ + "Section 161" + ], + "159177503": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 326", + "Section 325", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 147" + ], + "159192405": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "159202365": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 336", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "119394153": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294" + ], + "119398242": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 149" + ], + "119399036": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 324", + "Section 109", + "Section 149" + ], + "1164468": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "11674818": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 3", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 149", + "Section 294", + "Section 326" + ], + "779001": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "77922073": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 143", + "Section 147" + ], + "5609671": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 448", + "Section 109", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 341" + ], + "56099542": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 452", + "Section 147" + ], + "56101256": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 323" + ], + "56106625": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366A", + "Section 120", + "Section 34" + ], + "55885787": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 13" + ], + "55898428": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 149" + ], + "239250": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 228", + "Section 34", + "Section 306" + ], + "23929463": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 294", + "Section 324", + "Section 504" + ], + "239335": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 307" + ], + "23940975": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 201", + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A", + "Section 13" + ], + "22634336": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 34", + "Section 438" + ], + "22761305": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 147", + "Section 438", + "Section 323", + "Section 427", + "Section 149" + ], + "22978657": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 376", + "Section 304", + "Section 304A", + "Section 109" + ], + "23015624": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 13" + ], + "728049": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 326", + "Section 300", + "Section 299" + ], + "72814604": [ + "Section 364", + "Section 366", + "Section 365" + ], + "72826621": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 482", + "Section 506", + "Section 341", + "Section 323" + ], + "723485": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "72350903": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 341", + "Section 34" + ], + "72395": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 366", + "Section 394", + "Section 114" + ], + "722639": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 394" + ], + "72269201": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 306", + "Section 107" + ], + "1494150": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 397" + ], + "149731849": [ + "Section 143", + "Section 188" + ], + "149737890": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 468" + ], + "149740881": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 438" + ], + "149745204": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "140179690": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 384" + ], + "131598600": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "131605549": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 468" + ], + "681566": [ + "Section 5" + ], + "68166076": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "68174229": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366A", + "Section 376" + ], + "68177110": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294" + ], + "53110548": [ + "Section 313" + ], + "53122120": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 326" + ], + "54265591": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 353", + "Section 341" + ], + "54279335": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 307" + ], + "54287996": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "548665": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 149", + "Section 323", + "Section 148", + "Section 307" + ], + "55168219": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 392", + "Section 365", + "Section 120B" + ], + "55178832": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 34" + ], + "53198960": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294" + ], + "53207636": [ + "Section 13", + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 201", + "Section 465" + ], + "5429077": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "54654627": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 34", + "Section 308", + "Section 438", + "Section 354" + ], + "547736": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 437", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 307" + ], + "54949267": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 307", + "Section 302" + ], + "51683845": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 294" + ], + "51687621": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 506", + "Section 448", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 427" + ], + "51703634": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107", + "Section 34" + ], + "5170761": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 450" + ], + "534446": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 300", + "Section 482" + ], + "53450479": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 471" + ], + "175084144": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 294", + "Section 149", + "Section 341" + ], + "175095253": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 324" + ], + "175128577": [ + "Section 2", + "Section 3", + "Section 337", + "Section 353", + "Section 420", + "Section 304", + "Section 323", + "Section 392", + "Section 332" + ], + "1585378": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 193" + ], + "158538922": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 397" + ], + "158539654": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 504" + ], + "1585409": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "15855059": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 354", + "Section 294", + "Section 34", + "Section 3" + ], + "158551095": [ + "Section 5" + ], + "1584021": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 149", + "Section 107", + "Section 148", + "Section 109" + ], + "1584134": [ + "Section 320", + "Section 498A", + "Section 406" + ], + "158433165": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 34", + "Section 323" + ], + "158434163": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 324", + "Section 323" + ], + "159494043": [ + "Section 304A" + ], + "159684517": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "1597415": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "96789": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "96795989": [ + "Section 228" + ], + "96421156": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 148", + "Section 452", + "Section 201", + "Section 34", + "Section 149", + "Section 379", + "Section 341", + "Section 354", + "Section 342", + "Section 147" + ], + "1552199": [ + "Section 409" + ], + "155236890": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 279", + "Section 337", + "Section 417", + "Section 420", + "Section 188" + ], + "155255968": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 342" + ], + "15502285": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "1660548": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 326" + ], + "102976659": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 363" + ], + "1029775": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "102984416": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "89430884": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 114", + "Section 427", + "Section 323", + "Section 354" + ], + "89438354": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 397", + "Section 326", + "Section 452" + ], + "89445616": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "89456542": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 438", + "Section 448", + "Section 323", + "Section 354" + ], + "89465962": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 324", + "Section 308", + "Section 341", + "Section 325" + ], + "1236737": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 34", + "Section 304" + ], + "123677193": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120" + ], + "123683291": [ + "Section 389" + ], + "123687542": [ + "Section 500", + "Section 34", + "Section 2", + "Section 468", + "Section 465", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 173" + ], + "674015": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "6741364": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "674147": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "155046206": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 452", + "Section 504", + "Section 147", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 376", + "Section 323", + "Section 419", + "Section 34", + "Section 468", + "Section 120B" + ], + "155050976": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 341" + ], + "1550614": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 109", + "Section 420", + "Section 409" + ], + "155068028": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420" + ], + "155072363": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34" + ], + "188566042": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 363" + ], + "188585727": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A", + "Section 379" + ], + "28046364": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 353", + "Section 147", + "Section 3" + ], + "2790246": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 354", + "Section 313", + "Section 107" + ], + "163205008": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 34" + ], + "1632114": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 354" + ], + "163214435": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 420", + "Section 307", + "Section 109", + "Section 120B" + ], + "24457840": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 406", + "Section 201", + "Section 304", + "Section 379", + "Section 300", + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 5" + ], + "24480390": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 306", + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "24481670": [ + "Section 304A" + ], + "244875": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 149", + "Section 302" + ], + "244970": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 323", + "Section 341" + ], + "63940640": [ + "Section 447", + "Section 147" + ], + "63941692": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 437", + "Section 294" + ], + "63963239": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 304", + "Section 149", + "Section 300", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 325", + "Section 323" + ], + "33474807": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "334865": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 302", + "Section 308" + ], + "33487793": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 306" + ], + "33493079": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 506", + "Section 498A", + "Section 323" + ], + "33506004": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 161" + ], + "31726016": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 468" + ], + "31728065": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 376" + ], + "31736201": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 420" + ], + "225361": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406" + ], + "22553090": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 149" + ], + "225531": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 34", + "Section 149", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 307" + ], + "570161": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 511", + "Section 376" + ], + "570169": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 302" + ], + "57017706": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 147", + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 506" + ], + "57025390": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 417", + "Section 419", + "Section 467", + "Section 415", + "Section 406", + "Section 420" + ], + "57033437": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "57037835": [ + "Section 107", + "Section 306" + ], + "570386": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 161", + "Section 34", + "Section 452" + ], + "1355803": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 307", + "Section 161", + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 34", + "Section 149", + "Section 324" + ], + "1348967": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420" + ], + "134907578": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A", + "Section 107", + "Section 304" + ], + "13567361": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 448", + "Section 506" + ], + "1357209": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 114", + "Section 120B", + "Section 148" + ], + "135730410": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 324" + ], + "1357444": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 300", + "Section 323" + ], + "135745301": [ + "Section 384", + "Section 354", + "Section 506", + "Section 452", + "Section 2", + "Section 3", + "Section 200" + ], + "1172836": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 109", + "Section 504", + "Section 148", + "Section 452" + ], + "117289104": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 325", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "8622673": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 506" + ], + "86227745": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "862506": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 326", + "Section 149", + "Section 324" + ], + "165714868": [ + "Section 389" + ], + "165726926": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "896134": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 120B", + "Section 409", + "Section 420" + ], + "89630131": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 498A", + "Section 354" + ], + "896364": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 304B", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 306", + "Section 452", + "Section 300", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "139695803": [ + "Section 364", + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 304", + "Section 363", + "Section 3" + ], + "139702308": [ + "Section 395", + "Section 392" + ], + "139706240": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 465", + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 415", + "Section 2" + ], + "1414007": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 148", + "Section 323" + ], + "123718537": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366A", + "Section 120B" + ], + "12376162": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 304" + ], + "12378878": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 336", + "Section 148", + "Section 427", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 143" + ], + "123790381": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 306", + "Section 34" + ], + "67528883": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 379", + "Section 376" + ], + "188815123": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 306", + "Section 438" + ], + "188818657": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 419", + "Section 34", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 468" + ], + "188918082": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 336", + "Section 307", + "Section 341", + "Section 427", + "Section 147" + ], + "1889307": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "18893225": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 504", + "Section 336", + "Section 323", + "Section 143", + "Section 326" + ], + "1889523": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 465", + "Section 420" + ], + "188974575": [ + "Section 417", + "Section 306", + "Section 415" + ], + "1889876": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 417", + "Section 375", + "Section 506", + "Section 450" + ], + "1889940": [ + "Section 395" + ], + "1952170": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120" + ], + "155072805": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 34", + "Section 307" + ], + "1550955041": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 323" + ], + "1551452": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 511" + ], + "155148414": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 143", + "Section 436", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "936045": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "936199": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 34" + ], + "93621592": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 147" + ], + "57071363": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 304B" + ], + "570764": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 109", + "Section 467", + "Section 471" + ], + "57086127": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "57105555": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 308", + "Section 201" + ], + "57111491": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 34" + ], + "57112918": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 376", + "Section 164", + "Section 438" + ], + "57121745": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "571227": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 155", + "Section 332", + "Section 156", + "Section 353" + ], + "65241269": [ + "Section 186", + "Section 341", + "Section 325", + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "65244179": [ + "Section 364", + "Section 34", + "Section 411", + "Section 384" + ], + "65250383": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 457" + ], + "65252754": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 341", + "Section 506" + ], + "55363336": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 34", + "Section 379", + "Section 354" + ], + "55366951": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 420" + ], + "55389881": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 143" + ], + "55189468": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 427" + ], + "55200": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 394" + ], + "615537": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "615755": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 304" + ], + "62629762": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 411", + "Section 467", + "Section 409", + "Section 468" + ], + "62740006": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 394", + "Section 411", + "Section 34" + ], + "62799595": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 279", + "Section 427" + ], + "584199": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "58424532": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 109", + "Section 147", + "Section 307", + "Section 427", + "Section 114" + ], + "58439193": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406" + ], + "584415": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 294", + "Section 147" + ], + "584494": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "5845225": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 394" + ], + "58464214": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 427", + "Section 447" + ], + "584717": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 149", + "Section 300", + "Section 323" + ], + "58477505": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "58597974": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "58601625": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 323", + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 337", + "Section 147", + "Section 336", + "Section 148", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 427", + "Section 143" + ], + "58605037": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 498A", + "Section 498" + ], + "28740351": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 120B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 380" + ], + "184238641": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 304B" + ], + "18424518": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 471", + "Section 323" + ], + "11686922": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 147" + ], + "85099": [ + "Section 5", + "Section 409", + "Section 34", + "Section 109" + ], + "85100114": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 509", + "Section 438", + "Section 323" + ], + "85120063": [ + "Section 228", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467", + "Section 468" + ], + "851224": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 143", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 427", + "Section 326" + ], + "133157258": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 498A", + "Section 379" + ], + "133162569": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 300" + ], + "1331630": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 323", + "Section 511", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 354", + "Section 506", + "Section 411" + ], + "1332620": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 326", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 448", + "Section 147" + ], + "13326549": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "119622655": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 324" + ], + "11965400": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A" + ], + "119661357": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "81982498": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 365", + "Section 363" + ], + "81995605": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 294", + "Section 149" + ], + "91500": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 164" + ], + "9151124": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 155", + "Section 338", + "Section 504", + "Section 397" + ], + "91519833": [ + "Section 304B" + ], + "91525": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 193" + ], + "912581": [ + "Section 500", + "Section 406" + ], + "9126315": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 509", + "Section 506" + ], + "912700": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 482", + "Section 504", + "Section 143", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 392", + "Section 120B", + "Section 148" + ], + "91284034": [ + "Section 320", + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 338", + "Section 149" + ], + "91379894": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 354", + "Section 307", + "Section 34" + ], + "91646780": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 420" + ], + "91667074": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 427", + "Section 447", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "9167185": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 363" + ], + "431398": [ + "Section 409" + ], + "43157556": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 366" + ], + "43162612": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 420" + ], + "431716": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "171859928": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 342", + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 504" + ], + "1718647": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 304", + "Section 300" + ], + "171867024": [ + "Section 337", + "Section 338", + "Section 279", + "Section 457" + ], + "1718832": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 323" + ], + "17214376": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 506" + ], + "172163761": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 4" + ], + "995090": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "995325": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 482" + ], + "1747392": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 341", + "Section 147", + "Section 148" + ], + "199829323": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 465", + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 13", + "Section 409" + ], + "19954947": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 375", + "Section 498" + ], + "199555781": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 306", + "Section 201", + "Section 107", + "Section 34" + ], + "199575": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "101198378": [ + "Section 436", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 363", + "Section 147", + "Section 149" + ], + "101203838": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 457", + "Section 380", + "Section 376" + ], + "10121260": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 341" + ], + "101234242": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 155", + "Section 156" + ], + "1012533": [ + "Section 120B" + ], + "1012564": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "1012670": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 313", + "Section 406", + "Section 409" + ], + "101269878": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 341" + ], + "1012754": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 406" + ], + "101287": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420" + ], + "1012887": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302" + ], + "1012914": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 511" + ], + "101303890": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 506", + "Section 120B", + "Section 326", + "Section 3", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 504" + ], + "101309792": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "101309959": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "38635322": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "38659950": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "1095507": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "1095592": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 504" + ], + "1095695": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 342", + "Section 120B", + "Section 302", + "Section 365", + "Section 452", + "Section 506", + "Section 406", + "Section 323" + ], + "146898066": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 294", + "Section 323", + "Section 324" + ], + "146899378": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 34" + ], + "1469204": [ + "Section 436", + "Section 427", + "Section 380", + "Section 148", + "Section 448", + "Section 307", + "Section 147" + ], + "1453719": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "235268": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 448", + "Section 326" + ], + "23534129": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 354", + "Section 308", + "Section 34" + ], + "23541953": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 324", + "Section 354" + ], + "235455": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 120B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 482", + "Section 406" + ], + "23547346": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 438", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "100484118": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "1259044121": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 341", + "Section 342", + "Section 509", + "Section 323", + "Section 120B", + "Section 471", + "Section 500" + ], + "65350755": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 376" + ], + "49591423": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 120", + "Section 471", + "Section 468" + ], + "194479559": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506" + ], + "1944873": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 504", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 342", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 332" + ], + "194490332": [ + "Section 336", + "Section 452" + ], + "1945013": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306" + ], + "194505222": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "194511036": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "194527669": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 164" + ], + "24820910": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 294" + ], + "24822448": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 34" + ], + "24835018": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "24637368": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 498A", + "Section 307", + "Section 302" + ], + "24639200": [ + "Section 5" + ], + "39835400": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 313" + ], + "39855547": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 427", + "Section 504", + "Section 394", + "Section 397" + ], + "157328825": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 34" + ], + "1573310": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 341" + ], + "157332879": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "157355730": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 506" + ], + "105604797": [ + "Section 173", + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 409", + "Section 450", + "Section 354" + ], + "1056097": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 366", + "Section 506", + "Section 397", + "Section 336" + ], + "549121": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 325", + "Section 147", + "Section 3", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 149" + ], + "54916512": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 511", + "Section 375", + "Section 354" + ], + "54917721": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 34", + "Section 420", + "Section 161" + ], + "54928410": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 506", + "Section 427" + ], + "549326": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 394", + "Section 148", + "Section 465", + "Section 149" + ], + "5493301": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 363" + ], + "54948480": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 313", + "Section 34" + ], + "134991386": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 376" + ], + "134994322": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 447", + "Section 109", + "Section 325" + ], + "136117306": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1120373": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 313", + "Section 13", + "Section 34", + "Section 3" + ], + "111776332": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 320", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 498A" + ], + "111790392": [ + "Section 436", + "Section 427", + "Section 323", + "Section 437", + "Section 506", + "Section 147", + "Section 294" + ], + "1620165": [ + "Section 397" + ], + "197144461": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "195243790": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 3" + ], + "145559784": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 448", + "Section 323", + "Section 427" + ], + "1455864": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 320", + "Section 482" + ], + "92517478": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "92524270": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "9252902": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 506" + ], + "957073": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 427" + ], + "95710736": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 155", + "Section 406", + "Section 506", + "Section 120B", + "Section 494", + "Section 120", + "Section 471", + "Section 156", + "Section 468" + ], + "95732701": [ + "Section 417", + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "48708758": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 306", + "Section 323", + "Section 341" + ], + "48713684": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 336", + "Section 341", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 384", + "Section 323", + "Section 427", + "Section 302" + ], + "484562": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 467", + "Section 420" + ], + "484595": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 457", + "Section 379" + ], + "52441892": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "52442493": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294", + "Section 34" + ], + "128063814": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 498A", + "Section 354" + ], + "128083937": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 406" + ], + "128084": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 143", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 147", + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 323", + "Section 506" + ], + "126917929": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 120", + "Section 420" + ], + "1269283": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 417", + "Section 447", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 324", + "Section 375", + "Section 34" + ], + "194619420": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 506" + ], + "23429289": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 200" + ], + "102321045": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 452", + "Section 506" + ], + "102330748": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "10233468": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 300", + "Section 34", + "Section 304", + "Section 302" + ], + "1023373": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 467" + ], + "1021886": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 114", + "Section 326" + ], + "1022115": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 120B" + ], + "102212807": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 148", + "Section 186" + ], + "132681116": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "132716963": [ + "Section 509", + "Section 3", + "Section 323" + ], + "44538183": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "44559269": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 392", + "Section 411" + ], + "1848876": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 302" + ], + "184887793": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 411", + "Section 120B", + "Section 397" + ], + "184898513": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 13", + "Section 120B", + "Section 417" + ], + "1849154": [ + "Section 409" + ], + "167132024": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 380", + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 452", + "Section 457" + ], + "167132507": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "169940336": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "170805652": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1708075": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 307" + ], + "170814796": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 304B", + "Section 114" + ], + "1708173": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 109", + "Section 161" + ], + "108493044": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 504", + "Section 304" + ], + "108497470": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 452" + ], + "10780458": [ + "Section 143", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 341", + "Section 120", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 188", + "Section 353" + ], + "1082323": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 482" + ], + "108243572": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 353", + "Section 506" + ], + "1090800": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "207501": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 392", + "Section 34", + "Section 397" + ], + "207636": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "207727": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 325", + "Section 147", + "Section 302" + ], + "135061834": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 307", + "Section 448", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "135079748": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 506", + "Section 406" + ], + "134745621": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 34" + ], + "1352151": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "135190823": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 437", + "Section 307" + ], + "105695014": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 324", + "Section 34" + ], + "105697083": [ + "Section 279", + "Section 304A" + ], + "105706933": [ + "Section 500", + "Section 156" + ], + "105720373": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 120B", + "Section 376" + ], + "105727711": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "187125455": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 504", + "Section 436", + "Section 149", + "Section 337", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 452" + ], + "187127545": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A" + ], + "187145799": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 376" + ], + "187160308": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 392", + "Section 506", + "Section 504" + ], + "186425503": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 363", + "Section 2" + ], + "186427632": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 304" + ], + "315114": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 437" + ], + "31520277": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 34" + ], + "315271": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 325", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 323" + ], + "155295221": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 447", + "Section 147", + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 148", + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 186", + "Section 149", + "Section 120B", + "Section 354", + "Section 323", + "Section 452", + "Section 384", + "Section 406", + "Section 190", + "Section 482", + "Section 332" + ], + "120380087": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "120390101": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "1445922": [ + "Section 313", + "Section 342", + "Section 304", + "Section 302" + ], + "14460024": [ + "Section 511", + "Section 376", + "Section 354", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 375" + ], + "144603751": [ + "Section 436", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 427", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "16539153": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 447", + "Section 427", + "Section 325", + "Section 143", + "Section 338", + "Section 307" + ], + "1654": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "1654016": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 498", + "Section 304B" + ], + "163238027": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "1632437": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "1640613": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 307", + "Section 304", + "Section 302" + ], + "57706": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 341" + ], + "98516403": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "985202": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "985281": [ + "Section 397" + ], + "985864": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 164" + ], + "985934": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "98601730": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "98605197": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "974131": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "97413448": [ + "Section 450", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 506", + "Section 437" + ], + "975792": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 120B", + "Section 438", + "Section 149", + "Section 338", + "Section 147", + "Section 143", + "Section 337", + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "975832": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 320" + ], + "672425": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 34", + "Section 366" + ], + "122745": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "122759427": [ + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 149", + "Section 341", + "Section 147", + "Section 332", + "Section 155", + "Section 156" + ], + "140580536": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 419", + "Section 471", + "Section 468" + ], + "29173571": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 320" + ], + "115633795": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 34", + "Section 448", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 354" + ], + "115638": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 34" + ], + "1156490": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 354", + "Section 375", + "Section 448", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "115650339": [ + "Section 482" + ], + "1141331": [ + "Section 337", + "Section 279" + ], + "267753": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 511" + ], + "267826": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 149", + "Section 120B", + "Section 506", + "Section 365", + "Section 364", + "Section 34", + "Section 420", + "Section 323", + "Section 395", + "Section 173", + "Section 353", + "Section 436", + "Section 467", + "Section 468" + ], + "26790135": [ + "Section 190", + "Section 420", + "Section 173", + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 120", + "Section 114", + "Section 411", + "Section 109" + ], + "162606484": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 437", + "Section 506" + ], + "162610391": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294", + "Section 437" + ], + "141704214": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 173", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467", + "Section 409", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 161" + ], + "141709740": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 511" + ], + "167274": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "87733585": [ + "Section 397" + ], + "87739059": [ + "Section 164", + "Section 376" + ], + "87749831": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 147" + ], + "87750099": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 354", + "Section 438", + "Section 323" + ], + "1867682": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 341", + "Section 427", + "Section 448" + ], + "186783187": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 452" + ], + "1868864": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 304A", + "Section 302", + "Section 173", + "Section 379", + "Section 498", + "Section 366", + "Section 392" + ], + "186892312": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 354", + "Section 323", + "Section 304", + "Section 148", + "Section 511", + "Section 436", + "Section 300", + "Section 376", + "Section 324" + ], + "1732982": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 447", + "Section 147" + ], + "173328777": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 342", + "Section 34" + ], + "173343537": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 306", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "173349743": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 120B" + ], + "173359973": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 376" + ], + "1733815": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 302", + "Section 498" + ], + "182752668": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 34", + "Section 447", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 354", + "Section 326", + "Section 325" + ], + "144664717": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 506" + ], + "144679415": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 447", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "214907": [ + "Section 156", + "Section 190", + "Section 397", + "Section 200", + "Section 465", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 482", + "Section 120B", + "Section 506", + "Section 468", + "Section 34", + "Section 323" + ], + "21501920": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 34", + "Section 320", + "Section 294", + "Section 326" + ], + "21509366": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "21512507": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 448", + "Section 341", + "Section 148", + "Section 379", + "Section 342", + "Section 392", + "Section 147" + ], + "215231": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "315364": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 149" + ], + "31538746": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 447" + ], + "31545652": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "31549631": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 452" + ], + "315505": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 120B", + "Section 419", + "Section 420" + ], + "31551": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 452", + "Section 323", + "Section 147" + ], + "315925": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 120B" + ], + "31627892": [ + "Section 201" + ], + "165075214": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 450" + ], + "165075999": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 465", + "Section 468" + ], + "16508430": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 302" + ], + "165084521": [ + "Section 395", + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 392", + "Section 427", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 379", + "Section 302", + "Section 504", + "Section 452", + "Section 186", + "Section 506", + "Section 457", + "Section 201", + "Section 336", + "Section 380", + "Section 332" + ], + "165091303": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 143" + ], + "388592": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 5", + "Section 326" + ], + "38864858": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 306" + ], + "38868718": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 447", + "Section 379", + "Section 308", + "Section 325" + ], + "388917": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 320" + ], + "38895744": [ + "Section 304B" + ], + "389094": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 494", + "Section 482", + "Section 304B", + "Section 5", + "Section 34" + ], + "38912576": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 34", + "Section 143" + ], + "38913195": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 308", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 332", + "Section 299", + "Section 353", + "Section 300", + "Section 147" + ], + "38914569": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 366A" + ], + "52641933": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 504", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 342", + "Section 323", + "Section 511" + ], + "52655039": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 392", + "Section 395", + "Section 380", + "Section 457" + ], + "52661157": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 323", + "Section 354" + ], + "42325718": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 406", + "Section 438", + "Section 498", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "42370715": [ + "Section 4", + "Section 406", + "Section 498A", + "Section 5" + ], + "42484765": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107", + "Section 34", + "Section 500", + "Section 307", + "Section 482" + ], + "42488436": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "42490053": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 506" + ], + "45571076": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366A", + "Section 120B" + ], + "455716": [ + "Section 395", + "Section 436", + "Section 148", + "Section 380", + "Section 397", + "Section 147" + ], + "45580242": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 302", + "Section 392", + "Section 34" + ], + "1202763": [ + "Section 395", + "Section 156", + "Section 190", + "Section 173", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 448", + "Section 452", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 200", + "Section 34", + "Section 482", + "Section 380" + ], + "130389756": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 109" + ], + "115745355": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "11582170": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 325", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 452", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 304" + ], + "115828027": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 306", + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "115830876": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 34" + ], + "11435272": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 427", + "Section 448", + "Section 323" + ], + "114354835": [ + "Section 13", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467", + "Section 34" + ], + "1143556": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 161", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 323" + ], + "114723702": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 304", + "Section 149", + "Section 342" + ], + "114735232": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 336", + "Section 186", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 332", + "Section 427" + ], + "1147392": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 409", + "Section 120B" + ], + "110818545": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 509", + "Section 34" + ], + "110818561": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "1109128": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1327246": [ + "Section 409" + ], + "132726960": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 354", + "Section 506" + ], + "1327304": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 504", + "Section 395", + "Section 304", + "Section 397", + "Section 376", + "Section 307", + "Section 325", + "Section 3", + "Section 324", + "Section 452", + "Section 411" + ], + "1327342": [ + "Section 500", + "Section 509", + "Section 504", + "Section 366" + ], + "132737422": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 354", + "Section 363" + ], + "101874430": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 323" + ], + "83151": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 304B", + "Section 302" + ], + "8315308": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "83157": [ + "Section 436", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 307" + ], + "83166187": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 325", + "Section 365", + "Section 341", + "Section 504", + "Section 307", + "Section 294", + "Section 342" + ], + "90772311": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 427", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 397", + "Section 395", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 448", + "Section 511", + "Section 468", + "Section 143" + ], + "90873457": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 342" + ], + "90876413": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467", + "Section 411", + "Section 471" + ], + "908787": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 149", + "Section 323", + "Section 299", + "Section 147", + "Section 300", + "Section 302" + ], + "90882999": [ + "Section 337", + "Section 338", + "Section 279" + ], + "908882": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B" + ], + "24213349": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 392", + "Section 34" + ], + "242147": [ + "Section 337", + "Section 338", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 120", + "Section 161", + "Section 4", + "Section 3" + ], + "24238474": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 341" + ], + "242464": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 376" + ], + "2425334": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 294" + ], + "24271705": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 448" + ], + "133414092": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "133482321": [ + "Section 120B" + ], + "133495790": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 379" + ], + "13351227": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "84774878": [ + "Section 279", + "Section 304A" + ], + "875572": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 498A" + ], + "87561741": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "875679": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 34" + ], + "875702": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 324" + ], + "1849842": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 376" + ], + "1850087": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 341", + "Section 324", + "Section 147", + "Section 326", + "Section 148" + ], + "185013650": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 120B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 156", + "Section 201" + ], + "97101963": [ + "Section 384", + "Section 389", + "Section 294" + ], + "97103928": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 376", + "Section 325", + "Section 354", + "Section 448", + "Section 506", + "Section 379", + "Section 164" + ], + "971089": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 161" + ], + "109183361": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 397" + ], + "1092070": [ + "Section 120", + "Section 511", + "Section 307" + ], + "752054": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 452", + "Section 342" + ], + "75208257": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 341", + "Section 482" + ], + "75213979": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "7521627": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 306", + "Section 304", + "Section 107" + ], + "752196": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 325", + "Section 186", + "Section 353", + "Section 143", + "Section 332" + ], + "1100461": [ + "Section 498A" + ], + "1100478": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 120B", + "Section 452", + "Section 294" + ], + "1083411": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363" + ], + "108345425": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 325" + ], + "108360740": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 307", + "Section 325", + "Section 364", + "Section 34" + ], + "108635": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 304A" + ], + "108645529": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 506" + ], + "108647361": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 417", + "Section 306", + "Section 107", + "Section 4" + ], + "108661111": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 307", + "Section 308", + "Section 34" + ], + "108666745": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 302" + ], + "1086707": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 326", + "Section 109", + "Section 148", + "Section 34" + ], + "1086737": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "643273": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 397", + "Section 34" + ], + "643400": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B" + ], + "6422619": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "46297128": [ + "Section 509", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "46327291": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 302" + ], + "46330223": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 143", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "44121110": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 498A" + ], + "44219327": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "461938": [ + "Section 5" + ], + "46195389": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 437", + "Section 294" + ], + "462366": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 34", + "Section 307" + ], + "46238495": [ + "Section 450", + "Section 354", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 452" + ], + "12876500": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "128780438": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 494", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1287844": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 161", + "Section 389", + "Section 420", + "Section 5" + ], + "128786728": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 504" + ], + "128547452": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "128561066": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 394", + "Section 411" + ], + "1285703": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 300" + ], + "115326431": [ + "Section 465", + "Section 417", + "Section 420", + "Section 34", + "Section 409", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 467" + ], + "1289450": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 376" + ], + "128959694": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 109", + "Section 107", + "Section 34" + ], + "1289663": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 109", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467", + "Section 465", + "Section 107", + "Section 471" + ], + "128966334": [ + "Section 365", + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 494", + "Section 366A" + ], + "128979843": [ + "Section 450", + "Section 376" + ], + "128983363": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B" + ], + "128993287": [ + "Section 143", + "Section 427", + "Section 384", + "Section 448", + "Section 506", + "Section 294", + "Section 149" + ], + "112109708": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 324" + ], + "112119850": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 498A" + ], + "112126271": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 511" + ], + "112129329": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "112157886": [ + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "112160574": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 376", + "Section 394", + "Section 411" + ], + "143188866": [ + "Section 155", + "Section 34", + "Section 156" + ], + "1431923": [ + "Section 161" + ], + "143199547": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 376", + "Section 34", + "Section 363" + ], + "143214321": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366A", + "Section 34" + ], + "1709653": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "157049880": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 509", + "Section 323", + "Section 341" + ], + "157068": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 324" + ], + "30747761": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 354" + ], + "30760518": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 294", + "Section 186" + ], + "18832678": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "188335745": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 109", + "Section 506", + "Section 509", + "Section 4", + "Section 376", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "1883491": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 304", + "Section 325" + ], + "29499921": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 307", + "Section 353" + ], + "295052": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 149", + "Section 299", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 304", + "Section 307" + ], + "152010267": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 120", + "Section 504", + "Section 120B", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 452" + ], + "150874809": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 323" + ], + "1508759": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 109" + ], + "150886863": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 34" + ], + "150895885": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1508963": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 304", + "Section 504", + "Section 302" + ], + "152081498": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506" + ], + "152083808": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 120" + ], + "151546116": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "151556035": [ + "Section 308", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "151557716": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 324", + "Section 504" + ], + "1528273": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 149" + ], + "15282966": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 506", + "Section 342", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 427" + ], + "152830718": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 156" + ], + "15284002": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 511" + ], + "1528540": [ + "Section 436", + "Section 307" + ], + "38122954": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 306", + "Section 504", + "Section 3", + "Section 498A" + ], + "38125136": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 437" + ], + "381337": [ + "Section 366" + ], + "127441876": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "127442158": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 342", + "Section 509", + "Section 341", + "Section 363" + ], + "127442930": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 420" + ], + "1274471": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 341" + ], + "1274481": [ + "Section 4", + "Section 482" + ], + "127459994": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 415", + "Section 406", + "Section 120B", + "Section 409", + "Section 420" + ], + "1274677": [ + "Section 313", + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 164" + ], + "128099": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 147", + "Section 143", + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 149" + ], + "1281027": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 120B", + "Section 155", + "Section 341", + "Section 193", + "Section 156", + "Section 419", + "Section 365", + "Section 420", + "Section 437", + "Section 467", + "Section 392", + "Section 468" + ], + "12865734": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "128665525": [ + "Section 511", + "Section 379" + ], + "128667882": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 395", + "Section 324", + "Section 365" + ], + "128671954": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107", + "Section 498" + ], + "128679852": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 392", + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 336", + "Section 353", + "Section 332" + ], + "8911184": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 294" + ], + "89116668": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 504", + "Section 392", + "Section 506" + ], + "90396343": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 161", + "Section 304", + "Section 306" + ], + "910640": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 376", + "Section 498A", + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 411", + "Section 379", + "Section 498" + ], + "82514147": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 3", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 188" + ], + "825228": [ + "Section 313", + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 436" + ], + "82525555": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 506", + "Section 324", + "Section 307" + ], + "82541076": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 164" + ], + "825419": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "82550753": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "82552985": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 342", + "Section 452", + "Section 506", + "Section 161", + "Section 164", + "Section 120B", + "Section 173" + ], + "82692343": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 380", + "Section 457", + "Section 34" + ], + "827169": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 504", + "Section 323" + ], + "827314": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 34" + ], + "6070725": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 120B" + ], + "60716149": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 294" + ], + "174335551": [ + "Section 173", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 155", + "Section 307" + ], + "174336697": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 409", + "Section 420" + ], + "1743464": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 326", + "Section 307", + "Section 392", + "Section 324", + "Section 336", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "174349610": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "174362707": [ + "Section 279", + "Section 304" + ], + "174579707": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 342", + "Section 354" + ], + "177227300": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 294" + ], + "178039207": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 326", + "Section 323", + "Section 148", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 143", + "Section 147" + ], + "1780466": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 437", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 156", + "Section 406" + ], + "68922714": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 325", + "Section 307", + "Section 438" + ], + "689325": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 34" + ], + "689543": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 420" + ], + "68640827": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 143", + "Section 504", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 109", + "Section 332", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 149", + "Section 147" + ], + "686483": [ + "Section 161" + ], + "687421": [ + "Section 365", + "Section 427", + "Section 323", + "Section 294", + "Section 482", + "Section 120B", + "Section 506" + ], + "68766182": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "115355326": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 34", + "Section 366A" + ], + "115365177": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 34", + "Section 320", + "Section 161" + ], + "115379935": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 376", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "115383732": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 294" + ], + "1153850": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 482", + "Section 107", + "Section 155", + "Section 156", + "Section 498", + "Section 397" + ], + "1096419": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 324", + "Section 320", + "Section 148", + "Section 326" + ], + "159430575": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 465" + ], + "157616445": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 34", + "Section 306" + ], + "157620407": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 306" + ], + "155317340": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 294" + ], + "155320323": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "155335344": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 313", + "Section 304" + ], + "85290": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 379", + "Section 326", + "Section 307", + "Section 447", + "Section 302", + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 397", + "Section 325", + "Section 324" + ], + "852957": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 4", + "Section 380" + ], + "85303785": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 307", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 411" + ], + "85305232": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 161", + "Section 120B", + "Section 468" + ], + "85309214": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 325", + "Section 3", + "Section 427" + ], + "146564682": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 504", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 336", + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A" + ], + "146565166": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 394", + "Section 323", + "Section 392", + "Section 307", + "Section 341" + ], + "1465687": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 498A" + ], + "146577626": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A" + ], + "1465811": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107", + "Section 34", + "Section 2" + ], + "146502702": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 392" + ], + "146503269": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 506" + ], + "1465227": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467" + ], + "146533730": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 468" + ], + "1465454": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 482", + "Section 415", + "Section 406", + "Section 471", + "Section 465", + "Section 120B", + "Section 468", + "Section 417", + "Section 3" + ], + "146429011": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 437", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "1464305": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 201" + ], + "129026": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 406" + ], + "129027277": [ + "Section 306" + ], + "63532566": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 437" + ], + "63549633": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 294", + "Section 34", + "Section 506" + ], + "63552024": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 109", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 114" + ], + "1680975": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 468" + ], + "168103336": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 302" + ], + "60149505": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 482", + "Section 498A" + ], + "60158434": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120", + "Section 468", + "Section 419" + ], + "6002100": [ + "Section 173" + ], + "60037771": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 409", + "Section 457", + "Section 120B", + "Section 120" + ], + "60256116": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "60269805": [ + "Section 304A" + ], + "60290897": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 436", + "Section 506", + "Section 379", + "Section 143" + ], + "104887835": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294" + ], + "1048928": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 313", + "Section 164" + ], + "1049050": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 450", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 2", + "Section 147", + "Section 324", + "Section 452", + "Section 149" + ], + "104922041": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 395", + "Section 34" + ], + "1086322": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 375", + "Section 376" + ], + "1087692": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 307", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 313" + ], + "1088711": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 394", + "Section 397" + ], + "452629": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 436", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 325", + "Section 364", + "Section 148" + ], + "45275042": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 406", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 376", + "Section 417" + ], + "157765663": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 320" + ], + "1577701": [ + "Section 200", + "Section 120B" + ], + "157772943": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 325" + ], + "159602033": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 471" + ], + "159611068": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "159613114": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 450" + ], + "1596139": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 417", + "Section 304", + "Section 156" + ], + "159621": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 34", + "Section 313" + ], + "1596216": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "159627935": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 304" + ], + "122184174": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302" + ], + "1221904": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 143", + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 34", + "Section 147" + ], + "61218279": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 201", + "Section 34", + "Section 468", + "Section 379", + "Section 120B", + "Section 300", + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 4" + ], + "112627": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 326" + ], + "112632347": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 427", + "Section 149", + "Section 341", + "Section 114" + ], + "112646796": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 341" + ], + "112748471": [ + "Section 389" + ], + "11274861": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 511", + "Section 354", + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 504" + ], + "112765752": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 336", + "Section 294" + ], + "162706601": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 143", + "Section 34", + "Section 447", + "Section 427", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 354" + ], + "162707": [ + "Section 107", + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 323" + ], + "162725998": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 406", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 320" + ], + "162726730": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294" + ], + "162729643": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376" + ], + "194199171": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 148", + "Section 427", + "Section 149", + "Section 380", + "Section 186" + ], + "1942158": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 438", + "Section 506" + ], + "198804669": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 304", + "Section 308", + "Section 302", + "Section 452", + "Section 149" + ], + "1988116": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "3087241": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 494", + "Section 307" + ], + "308990": [ + "Section 304B" + ], + "1439103": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 323" + ], + "143943206": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 379", + "Section 420", + "Section 415" + ], + "144218125": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 120B", + "Section 420" + ], + "144224503": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 161", + "Section 34" + ], + "91148079": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 392", + "Section 506", + "Section 336", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 341" + ], + "91153496": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 300" + ], + "176665396": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 120B" + ], + "1766656": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 366", + "Section 34", + "Section 363", + "Section 342", + "Section 506" + ], + "17645158": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "1764517": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 325", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 300" + ], + "176460348": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 143" + ], + "189398178": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "1894132": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 325" + ], + "45797618": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 354", + "Section 34" + ], + "45799711": [ + "Section 13" + ], + "458018": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 326", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 313" + ], + "45830127": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 325", + "Section 320" + ], + "1603353": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 5" + ], + "160343279": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 406", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "1874256": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 341", + "Section 147", + "Section 307", + "Section 294", + "Section 332", + "Section 427", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 279", + "Section 353", + "Section 320", + "Section 34" + ], + "1883187": [ + "Section 161" + ], + "188814867": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 34" + ], + "188843306": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 325", + "Section 307", + "Section 147" + ], + "188199324": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 452", + "Section 392", + "Section 397" + ], + "1881995": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 397", + "Section 341", + "Section 193", + "Section 342", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 427", + "Section 471" + ], + "188200444": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294", + "Section 147", + "Section 3", + "Section 149", + "Section 504", + "Section 506" + ], + "188210338": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 308", + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 186" + ], + "190401": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 500", + "Section 34" + ], + "1904042": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "1063395": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 364", + "Section 120B" + ], + "7862428": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 34" + ], + "7888883": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 354", + "Section 341", + "Section 342", + "Section 427" + ], + "78899234": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 511", + "Section 375", + "Section 354" + ], + "78903727": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 468", + "Section 34", + "Section 417", + "Section 471", + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 120B", + "Section 156" + ], + "79786": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 342", + "Section 326", + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 148" + ], + "797943": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 107", + "Section 342" + ], + "7980034": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 504", + "Section 302", + "Section 436", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 332", + "Section 109", + "Section 325", + "Section 353", + "Section 120B", + "Section 336", + "Section 427" + ], + "79800917": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 392", + "Section 294" + ], + "7980298": [ + "Section 201" + ], + "79803330": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "79812190": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 504", + "Section 494", + "Section 498", + "Section 498A", + "Section 323" + ], + "79816183": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A" + ], + "589689": [ + "Section 366" + ], + "58974500": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 384", + "Section 120B", + "Section 419" + ], + "58986050": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 376" + ], + "1689237": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 307", + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "168927352": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 438" + ], + "169026887": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 342", + "Section 376", + "Section 2", + "Section 366" + ], + "169036330": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "1897035": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 409", + "Section 149", + "Section 161", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 467" + ], + "1897045": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 379" + ], + "189706037": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "189725": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 482", + "Section 498A" + ], + "74142886": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 323", + "Section 498A", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 376", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 109", + "Section 34" + ], + "741433": [ + "Section 364", + "Section 302" + ], + "741528": [ + "Section 149" + ], + "74168625": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "74173227": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 149", + "Section 147" + ], + "73064372": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "7307182": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 376" + ], + "730779": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "7308188": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 337", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 302", + "Section 147" + ], + "736162": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 364" + ], + "736394": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 324", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 341", + "Section 307" + ], + "73649178": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 304", + "Section 411", + "Section 392", + "Section 34", + "Section 201", + "Section 109", + "Section 332", + "Section 120B", + "Section 409", + "Section 341" + ], + "73667063": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 447", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 397", + "Section 149" + ], + "74223801": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 324" + ], + "74227849": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 437" + ], + "74244646": [ + "Section 336", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 294", + "Section 323" + ], + "74245996": [ + "Section 308", + "Section 294", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "1574135": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 313", + "Section 201", + "Section 511" + ], + "83370218": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "83389": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 379", + "Section 34" + ], + "83408381": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 332", + "Section 438", + "Section 379", + "Section 149", + "Section 186" + ], + "45850564": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 452", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 506", + "Section 304", + "Section 34" + ], + "45854785": [ + "Section 365", + "Section 34", + "Section 363", + "Section 438" + ], + "45856609": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 34" + ], + "930412": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 420" + ], + "97498990": [ + "Section 337", + "Section 279" + ], + "975851": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302" + ], + "192250598": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "1922701": [ + "Section 415" + ], + "194237642": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A" + ], + "194239709": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "194823966": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 506", + "Section 452", + "Section 324" + ], + "194845543": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "194857336": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "68532966": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 302" + ], + "97697488": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 342", + "Section 452", + "Section 325", + "Section 506" + ], + "977277": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 34" + ], + "97740234": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 324", + "Section 326", + "Section 302", + "Section 436" + ], + "97745345": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 201" + ], + "62691375": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 447", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "627077": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 324", + "Section 326", + "Section 506", + "Section 341", + "Section 504" + ], + "62708141": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "62727384": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 294", + "Section 506" + ], + "62732971": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "184306783": [ + "Section 190", + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 307" + ], + "184314192": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "184318862": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 452", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 375" + ], + "184326016": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "184341529": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 438" + ], + "1826073": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 471", + "Section 504", + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 467" + ], + "182612855": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 324" + ], + "182818408": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 323", + "Section 363", + "Section 342" + ], + "1828220": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 109", + "Section 34" + ], + "182827154": [ + "Section 143", + "Section 332", + "Section 120B", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 186" + ], + "1828378": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 302" + ], + "1830078": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 109", + "Section 302" + ], + "183017629": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 409", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 465", + "Section 419", + "Section 107", + "Section 406", + "Section 468", + "Section 3", + "Section 417" + ], + "193844066": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 394" + ], + "1938526": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302" + ], + "1938562": [ + "Section 164", + "Section 34", + "Section 120B", + "Section 313", + "Section 302", + "Section 397", + "Section 307" + ], + "1938584": [ + "Section 161" + ], + "193861473": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 482" + ], + "1938674": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "193608142": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "25617175": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 354", + "Section 34", + "Section 406" + ], + "25630164": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 324" + ], + "256337": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 34", + "Section 300", + "Section 326" + ], + "26697745": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 201", + "Section 147", + "Section 326" + ], + "26698606": [ + "Section 161" + ], + "26699738": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 511" + ], + "26719319": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 427", + "Section 324" + ], + "261796": [ + "Section 500" + ], + "26201290": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 341", + "Section 147", + "Section 148" + ], + "2620244": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 34", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 164", + "Section 326", + "Section 324" + ], + "269786": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "269963": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 406", + "Section 420" + ], + "195913761": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 506", + "Section 186", + "Section 228", + "Section 342" + ], + "195926482": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 302", + "Section 161", + "Section 511" + ], + "195934672": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 323", + "Section 506" + ], + "29036422": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 409" + ], + "29060748": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "290662": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 306" + ], + "76377365": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "76393748": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 302", + "Section 364", + "Section 34" + ], + "76405830": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 120B", + "Section 482", + "Section 34", + "Section 323" + ], + "189769305": [ + "Section 143", + "Section 332", + "Section 148", + "Section 342", + "Section 427", + "Section 149" + ], + "189769740": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 366", + "Section 365", + "Section 363" + ], + "189785690": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 109", + "Section 120", + "Section 409" + ], + "1483687": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 147" + ], + "148375505": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "148387291": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 504", + "Section 326", + "Section 323" + ], + "148394889": [ + "Section 450", + "Section 294", + "Section 341" + ], + "41726910": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 465", + "Section 120" + ], + "4176577": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 506" + ], + "407662": [ + "Section 149" + ], + "40784833": [ + "Section 120B" + ], + "151095376": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 427", + "Section 506" + ], + "151102751": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 302" + ], + "132353808": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 307" + ], + "132387896": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 120B", + "Section 419" + ], + "132471805": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 504", + "Section 326", + "Section 147", + "Section 323" + ], + "170039766": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 304A" + ], + "170044565": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 34", + "Section 420" + ], + "167681331": [ + "Section 164", + "Section 506", + "Section 107", + "Section 436", + "Section 395", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 161", + "Section 397", + "Section 452", + "Section 342", + "Section 376" + ], + "16775532": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 406", + "Section 498A" + ], + "167941618": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 341", + "Section 509", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "1714402": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "171442281": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 120B" + ], + "1714594": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 406", + "Section 482", + "Section 190" + ], + "17230923": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 302", + "Section 353", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 323" + ], + "1723203": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 2", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 326", + "Section 149", + "Section 147" + ], + "1723309": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 384", + "Section 420" + ], + "1723356": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 304", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 148", + "Section 307" + ], + "1727403": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 465", + "Section 471", + "Section 468" + ], + "174448859": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A", + "Section 498" + ], + "174709610": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 406", + "Section 419" + ], + "1747861": [ + "Section 173", + "Section 409", + "Section 342" + ], + "174824358": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "29663035": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 506" + ], + "296649": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "29665089": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 457", + "Section 307", + "Section 279", + "Section 149", + "Section 452", + "Section 325", + "Section 324", + "Section 143", + "Section 354" + ], + "29677407": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "85639929": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 452", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 376", + "Section 324" + ], + "58617856": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "58624611": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 307", + "Section 326" + ], + "5862996": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 34", + "Section 5", + "Section 4" + ], + "58637463": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 13" + ], + "58644119": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 325", + "Section 148" + ], + "1179040": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 325", + "Section 304" + ], + "1179168": [ + "Section 415" + ], + "117940942": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306" + ], + "1177744": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 306" + ], + "117777389": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 506", + "Section 509" + ], + "1133455": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 302" + ], + "1133541": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 173", + "Section 148", + "Section 161", + "Section 200", + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 149", + "Section 147" + ], + "40878315": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 353", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 186" + ], + "40882677": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "21035896": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "21059799": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 294" + ], + "16608501": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A", + "Section 506", + "Section 354", + "Section 376", + "Section 366", + "Section 363" + ], + "166098016": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 34", + "Section 307" + ], + "1661078": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 468", + "Section 193" + ], + "1661153": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 149", + "Section 114" + ], + "1661166": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 409", + "Section 304B", + "Section 120B" + ], + "166119307": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 34" + ], + "151164963": [ + "Section 397" + ], + "1511654": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 504" + ], + "151176653": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 353", + "Section 143", + "Section 186", + "Section 341" + ], + "151192883": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107" + ], + "151207266": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 365", + "Section 341", + "Section 363", + "Section 354", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "36839830": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107" + ], + "368737": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 498", + "Section 498A" + ], + "36695358": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 379" + ], + "367025": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 302" + ], + "47604499": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 354", + "Section 506" + ], + "47616208": [ + "Section 452" + ], + "19740247": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "1974122": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "197419288": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 397", + "Section 365", + "Section 379" + ], + "197425828": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A" + ], + "197429243": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 120" + ], + "1974324": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 34", + "Section 411", + "Section 406", + "Section 420" + ], + "1974398": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 228" + ], + "1974403": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1009186": [ + "Section 494" + ], + "100924190": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "1103452": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "161234136": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 341", + "Section 354", + "Section 506" + ], + "178076722": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "178077468": [ + "Section 338", + "Section 279" + ], + "178079956": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "177087982": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 341" + ], + "177099054": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406" + ], + "1774268": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 342", + "Section 34" + ], + "1774332": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 302", + "Section 379", + "Section 307", + "Section 300" + ], + "177827320": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 482" + ], + "177827704": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 304", + "Section 300" + ], + "1785399": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 161" + ], + "178550919": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 506" + ], + "89131983": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 504" + ], + "1788364": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 419" + ], + "178866303": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 307", + "Section 447", + "Section 326" + ], + "178876236": [ + "Section 450", + "Section 294", + "Section 506" + ], + "1788778": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 201", + "Section 313" + ], + "17888056": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 332", + "Section 307", + "Section 448", + "Section 342", + "Section 379", + "Section 324" + ], + "1790047": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "179004764": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 186" + ], + "185673586": [ + "Section 279", + "Section 427" + ], + "185674059": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 306", + "Section 438", + "Section 506" + ], + "1418976": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B" + ], + "1420303": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 302" + ], + "142040579": [ + "Section 498A" + ], + "142045592": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 307", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1420504": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "1677227": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 323" + ], + "167743508": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 308", + "Section 300" + ], + "16774655": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 379", + "Section 307", + "Section 341", + "Section 380" + ], + "165158071": [ + "Section 5", + "Section 397", + "Section 3", + "Section 394" + ], + "1651590": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 324", + "Section 337", + "Section 325", + "Section 302" + ], + "165177012": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 3", + "Section 323" + ], + "981261": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 34" + ], + "98135627": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1831752": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 406", + "Section 313" + ], + "183202185": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 307", + "Section 394", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 149", + "Section 452" + ], + "1317522": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 482", + "Section 120B" + ], + "131768952": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 143" + ], + "13191206": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "131932725": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 384", + "Section 376", + "Section 395", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 149" + ], + "1319454": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 447", + "Section 306", + "Section 3" + ], + "1542172": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 326", + "Section 324" + ], + "154218998": [ + "Section 338", + "Section 279" + ], + "154222619": [ + "Section 364", + "Section 3", + "Section 156", + "Section 366", + "Section 506" + ], + "154155": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1541620": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 120B" + ], + "154170237": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 200" + ], + "160032221": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 394", + "Section 392" + ], + "160034538": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 304", + "Section 341", + "Section 336", + "Section 323", + "Section 326", + "Section 34" + ], + "28587648": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 363", + "Section 34", + "Section 366", + "Section 342" + ], + "285934": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 304" + ], + "28600286": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "28601015": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 307", + "Section 325", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 354", + "Section 448", + "Section 379" + ], + "286180": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 148", + "Section 307" + ], + "28621538": [ + "Section 155", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 156", + "Section 506", + "Section 482", + "Section 447" + ], + "28625806": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "148735920": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 161" + ], + "1838948": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "184766501": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "114430455": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "114443405": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 447", + "Section 384", + "Section 120B", + "Section 323" + ], + "114445826": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "113479948": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "114019030": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 341", + "Section 120B" + ], + "1143508": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "1144577": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 364", + "Section 34", + "Section 366", + "Section 450" + ], + "49368410": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 34", + "Section 409", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 420" + ], + "49375578": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "49375731": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "886118": [ + "Section 5", + "Section 2" + ], + "886126": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "86317852": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 302" + ], + "86327494": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 364" + ], + "86332540": [ + "Section 300" + ], + "86338996": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 504", + "Section 498A", + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 323" + ], + "86339110": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 375" + ], + "86347599": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 427", + "Section 186", + "Section 148", + "Section 120B", + "Section 188", + "Section 332", + "Section 336", + "Section 436", + "Section 307", + "Section 353", + "Section 147" + ], + "84605801": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "85746377": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 419" + ], + "30337027": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 482" + ], + "30366250": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 342", + "Section 201", + "Section 379", + "Section 34" + ], + "91749648": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 380" + ], + "91751105": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 147", + "Section 148" + ], + "91754785": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 34" + ], + "91762851": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 34" + ], + "917785": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "112323999": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 3", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "112345056": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 506" + ], + "112364284": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 427", + "Section 437", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 336" + ], + "112368361": [ + "Section 384", + "Section 506", + "Section 420" + ], + "112375982": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 294" + ], + "1123788": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 409", + "Section 186", + "Section 406", + "Section 120B", + "Section 468", + "Section 419", + "Section 500" + ], + "11237998": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 392" + ], + "112402625": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 306", + "Section 498" + ], + "116483": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "116486103": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "116499089": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 427" + ], + "37665947": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 148", + "Section 324", + "Section 504", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 326" + ], + "376792": [ + "Section 384", + "Section 406", + "Section 4" + ], + "376949": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "37697277": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 306", + "Section 498A", + "Section 161" + ], + "39085649": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "39106985": [ + "Section 229A" + ], + "363406": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "363572": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 164" + ], + "36381860": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 147" + ], + "36384917": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 341" + ], + "154804358": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 294", + "Section 337", + "Section 447", + "Section 324" + ], + "1397274": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 471" + ], + "1397533": [ + "Section 120B" + ], + "1397646": [ + "Section 417", + "Section 341", + "Section 376", + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 323" + ], + "141253388": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 34", + "Section 438" + ], + "141255520": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "141270579": [ + "Section 419", + "Section 467", + "Section 468" + ], + "141272571": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 304B" + ], + "111344695": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 354", + "Section 452", + "Section 325", + "Section 427", + "Section 323" + ], + "111362558": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 107", + "Section 306" + ], + "35893633": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "358939": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 299" + ], + "35915673": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 304B" + ], + "35920433": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "399988": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 326", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 427", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 320" + ], + "40005259": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 420", + "Section 302", + "Section 323" + ], + "40081234": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 326" + ], + "40088374": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 34" + ], + "40107146": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "88102080": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 506" + ], + "88105760": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 509", + "Section 506", + "Section 354" + ], + "881122": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 161" + ], + "88122548": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 436", + "Section 448", + "Section 149" + ], + "160716155": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 107" + ], + "160740668": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 436", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 326", + "Section 120B", + "Section 149", + "Section 306", + "Section 34", + "Section 354", + "Section 353", + "Section 427", + "Section 201", + "Section 120", + "Section 164" + ], + "153486605": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 389" + ], + "153493156": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 509", + "Section 341" + ], + "153502560": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 148", + "Section 427", + "Section 149", + "Section 186" + ], + "33766072": [ + "Section 336", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "337793": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 148" + ], + "66902901": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 506" + ], + "1340877": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 147", + "Section 504", + "Section 447" + ], + "134092": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 323" + ], + "134092595": [ + "Section 337", + "Section 307", + "Section 279" + ], + "151810391": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 376" + ], + "151813261": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 504", + "Section 302", + "Section 147" + ], + "151821264": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 452", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 143", + "Section 147" + ], + "69714": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 323", + "Section 452" + ], + "69734882": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 341" + ], + "69742283": [ + "Section 229A" + ], + "1911883": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 304", + "Section 302" + ], + "164132339": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 34", + "Section 307" + ], + "1710363": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "171052438": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 506", + "Section 147" + ], + "1180379": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 323", + "Section 324" + ], + "118047072": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 34", + "Section 506" + ], + "118054497": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 147", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "118066341": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 436", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 504", + "Section 506" + ], + "118067522": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 438" + ], + "195313985": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 427", + "Section 379", + "Section 411", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 353", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 506" + ], + "195317224": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 294" + ], + "195052585": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 34" + ], + "195518888": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 294" + ], + "61790953": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "61792615": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 304", + "Section 306", + "Section 107", + "Section 498" + ], + "61794874": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 337" + ], + "61796038": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 419", + "Section 438" + ], + "61806656": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 341", + "Section 354", + "Section 3" + ], + "4730944": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 354", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "473270": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 353" + ], + "92284003": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 299", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 149" + ], + "923045": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 406", + "Section 200", + "Section 498A", + "Section 494" + ], + "92325436": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "92335682": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 448", + "Section 302", + "Section 325", + "Section 307" + ], + "940732": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "94646240": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 147", + "Section 506", + "Section 325" + ], + "94648136": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 323", + "Section 190", + "Section 307", + "Section 482" + ], + "94682856": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "12702": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 363", + "Section 506" + ], + "127034959": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 341", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 397" + ], + "1270436": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 304", + "Section 447", + "Section 326" + ], + "127088529": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 506", + "Section 379", + "Section 148", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 380" + ], + "127090378": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 307", + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 332", + "Section 353" + ], + "127092828": [ + "Section 313", + "Section 498A" + ], + "127092831": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A" + ], + "114752573": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 161" + ], + "1147656": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 332", + "Section 147", + "Section 304A", + "Section 342", + "Section 326", + "Section 325", + "Section 302" + ], + "114776443": [ + "Section 279", + "Section 337" + ], + "56229415": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 294" + ], + "56230928": [ + "Section 511", + "Section 376", + "Section 406", + "Section 323" + ], + "56254969": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 120", + "Section 420", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "56265161": [ + "Section 2", + "Section 5" + ], + "1376699": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 307" + ], + "1376727": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 450", + "Section 395" + ], + "13767734": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 149", + "Section 143", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 306", + "Section 114" + ], + "137681270": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 302", + "Section 498A" + ], + "13775": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "137751594": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 438", + "Section 294" + ], + "65063740": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 392", + "Section 307", + "Section 353", + "Section 394" + ], + "65068089": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "6507292": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 498A", + "Section 504" + ], + "649042": [ + "Section 465", + "Section 468", + "Section 155" + ], + "322896": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 279" + ], + "32289766": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 448", + "Section 506" + ], + "32297769": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 509" + ], + "322993": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 149" + ], + "3229999": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 320" + ], + "312180": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 149" + ], + "33033525": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 363", + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "330429": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 380", + "Section 468" + ], + "33045506": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 324", + "Section 447", + "Section 325", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 114" + ], + "125174502": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 341" + ], + "125174908": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 364" + ], + "125180002": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 34" + ], + "125182786": [ + "Section 114", + "Section 392" + ], + "125184249": [ + "Section 114", + "Section 332", + "Section 364", + "Section 379", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 34" + ], + "123123409": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "123123670": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304" + ], + "1231386": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 506" + ], + "12343861": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 420", + "Section 409", + "Section 120B" + ], + "192126300": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 354", + "Section 438", + "Section 323" + ], + "192126630": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 336", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 342", + "Section 149", + "Section 332" + ], + "192128783": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107", + "Section 109" + ], + "1921288": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 304", + "Section 342", + "Section 300", + "Section 313" + ], + "19197091": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 304B" + ], + "65964743": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "65834556": [ + "Section 229A" + ], + "658515": [ + "Section 4", + "Section 304" + ], + "65864305": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 354", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "13469595": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 143", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 427" + ], + "87064369": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "87088939": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 506", + "Section 498", + "Section 494" + ], + "1030082": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 465" + ], + "1030147": [ + "Section 500" + ], + "1030158": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 341", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 448", + "Section 148", + "Section 427", + "Section 326", + "Section 452", + "Section 147" + ], + "102824214": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 420" + ], + "102831095": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 506", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 148" + ], + "1028374": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "103933764": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 506" + ], + "103942103": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 34", + "Section 120B" + ], + "103944664": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 156" + ], + "103946": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 324" + ], + "103813935": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 448" + ], + "103816328": [ + "Section 308", + "Section 353", + "Section 332" + ], + "10384439": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "104282651": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 307" + ], + "104283806": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 354", + "Section 341", + "Section 438", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "1042913": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 326", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 307" + ], + "104318565": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 294" + ], + "104323165": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 326", + "Section 325" + ], + "195415451": [ + "Section 186", + "Section 332", + "Section 353", + "Section 437" + ], + "78748767": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 353", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "787614": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 200", + "Section 143", + "Section 307" + ], + "78764009": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 302", + "Section 313" + ], + "96637042": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A", + "Section 482", + "Section 107" + ], + "96638914": [ + "Section 389" + ], + "96660": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "9666418": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 34", + "Section 120", + "Section 120B", + "Section 332", + "Section 417", + "Section 148", + "Section 109" + ], + "496569": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 332", + "Section 323", + "Section 300", + "Section 353" + ], + "496676": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "499850": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "499861": [ + "Section 109" + ], + "490957": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 384", + "Section 342", + "Section 376", + "Section 379" + ], + "49099521": [ + "Section 279", + "Section 304", + "Section 337" + ], + "49107411": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 448", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "49110477": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "49116528": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "22234486": [ + "Section 494" + ], + "22235566": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 323", + "Section 304B", + "Section 326", + "Section 468" + ], + "22252430": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 438", + "Section 467" + ], + "22255236": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 498A", + "Section 201", + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "222587": [ + "Section 417", + "Section 506", + "Section 376" + ], + "222636": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 326", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 324" + ], + "24851817": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "24884325": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 409" + ], + "253747": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 228" + ], + "25492288": [ + "Section 389", + "Section 384", + "Section 304" + ], + "97785009": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 384", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "66735578": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 34" + ], + "66758": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 304" + ], + "66761329": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A" + ], + "66771375": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 376", + "Section 420" + ], + "154672618": [ + "Section 452" + ], + "154687875": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "1546908": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "880547": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 34" + ], + "88077374": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "88078365": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 186", + "Section 143" + ], + "880924": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "88097331": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 147", + "Section 323" + ], + "88097809": [ + "Section 452" + ], + "88098177": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 376", + "Section 342", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "129917791": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 506", + "Section 342" + ], + "129934246": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 506" + ], + "1299518": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 452", + "Section 300", + "Section 323" + ], + "128121960": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 406" + ], + "128219516": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 419", + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 409", + "Section 465", + "Section 193", + "Section 406", + "Section 200", + "Section 120B", + "Section 173", + "Section 190", + "Section 3", + "Section 482", + "Section 156" + ], + "12831097": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 506", + "Section 5", + "Section 376" + ], + "128400327": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 2" + ], + "593163": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 279", + "Section 337" + ], + "593294": [ + "Section 409" + ], + "59621185": [ + "Section 465", + "Section 471", + "Section 417", + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 468" + ], + "59622355": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 326" + ], + "59624065": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B" + ], + "596365": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 186", + "Section 482", + "Section 156", + "Section 173" + ], + "59652762": [ + "Section 279", + "Section 337", + "Section 338", + "Section 304", + "Section 304A" + ], + "69927704": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 447" + ], + "69937552": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 120B" + ], + "68042202": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "70927410": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "709523": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 364", + "Section 420" + ], + "70957995": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 452", + "Section 325", + "Section 506" + ], + "240069": [ + "Section 190", + "Section 302", + "Section 506", + "Section 200", + "Section 156", + "Section 173", + "Section 324", + "Section 201", + "Section 364" + ], + "24025836": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B" + ], + "181239662": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 336", + "Section 294", + "Section 186" + ], + "181243623": [ + "Section 279", + "Section 337" + ], + "181245304": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "181252518": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 438", + "Section 294" + ], + "181329460": [ + "Section 164", + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 354", + "Section 506" + ], + "181331360": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 504" + ], + "181332375": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1813416": [ + "Section 395" + ], + "1521345": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 109", + "Section 395", + "Section 326" + ], + "15213920": [ + "Section 417", + "Section 120B", + "Section 406" + ], + "152244555": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 511", + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A", + "Section 120B", + "Section 354" + ], + "1522549": [ + "Section 5", + "Section 4" + ], + "152263": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 394", + "Section 397" + ], + "152066995": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "172984107": [ + "Section 389" + ], + "1730138": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 34" + ], + "1728246": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 201" + ], + "1728264": [ + "Section 186", + "Section 353", + "Section 2" + ], + "1728418": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 193", + "Section 465" + ], + "415587": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 364", + "Section 161" + ], + "41582874": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 354", + "Section 452", + "Section 504", + "Section 376" + ], + "187688494": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 406", + "Section 498A" + ], + "187696468": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 341", + "Section 394", + "Section 294", + "Section 437" + ], + "1878620": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 149" + ], + "187884107": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 341", + "Section 506" + ], + "187900648": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323" + ], + "18790469": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 307" + ], + "187912623": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "1397958": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 120B" + ], + "139800325": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 186", + "Section 188" + ], + "139802": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 307", + "Section 332" + ], + "43192545": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 409", + "Section 406" + ], + "433094": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 376", + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 228", + "Section 304", + "Section 164" + ], + "38264736": [ + "Section 299", + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 320", + "Section 304A" + ], + "38277178": [ + "Section 366A", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 363" + ], + "38278644": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 34" + ], + "94152508": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 143" + ], + "94153828": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 354", + "Section 447", + "Section 427", + "Section 34", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 308" + ], + "94155298": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 294" + ], + "941717": [ + "Section 364", + "Section 363", + "Section 365" + ], + "941727": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "11343999": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 326" + ], + "1134486": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 320" + ], + "113463004": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 450" + ], + "920025": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 300" + ], + "92008899": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 109", + "Section 392", + "Section 411" + ], + "92014": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 304" + ], + "1423024": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "154284442": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 323", + "Section 326", + "Section 482" + ], + "154289": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 448", + "Section 427", + "Section 447", + "Section 147" + ], + "1543035": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 417", + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 471" + ], + "507252": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "50728204": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "50762245": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 294" + ], + "52005398": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "52012574": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 304", + "Section 3" + ], + "180411442": [ + "Section 389" + ], + "130270988": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 294", + "Section 186" + ], + "130287313": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304A", + "Section 201" + ], + "31929238": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 313", + "Section 304" + ], + "31938202": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 307", + "Section 438", + "Section 498A" + ], + "11499836": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 438", + "Section 323" + ], + "114998411": [ + "Section 300" + ], + "195488235": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 228", + "Section 120B", + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 201", + "Section 471", + "Section 409", + "Section 468", + "Section 302", + "Section 465" + ], + "1955029": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 506" + ], + "1955096": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "195535114": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 149", + "Section 500", + "Section 504", + "Section 34", + "Section 148", + "Section 143", + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 324" + ], + "195549537": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "145175811": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 354", + "Section 468" + ], + "145190559": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 436" + ], + "145195654": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 452", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 450", + "Section 147", + "Section 300", + "Section 149", + "Section 148" + ], + "145198228": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 406", + "Section 341", + "Section 498A", + "Section 155", + "Section 156" + ], + "145202852": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 506", + "Section 448", + "Section 379" + ], + "145269266": [ + "Section 164", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 376" + ], + "145277887": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 427", + "Section 188", + "Section 307", + "Section 353", + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 332" + ], + "1452927": [ + "Section 337", + "Section 279", + "Section 379", + "Section 338", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "145307188": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "1453090": [ + "Section 5", + "Section 420", + "Section 409", + "Section 304B", + "Section 120B", + "Section 13" + ], + "145318813": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294" + ], + "14532387": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 326", + "Section 452", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 438" + ], + "179452045": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "1794544": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 326" + ], + "179456111": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A" + ], + "161693387": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 161" + ], + "42122117": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 379", + "Section 34", + "Section 504", + "Section 448", + "Section 427", + "Section 120B", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 354" + ], + "42124722": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 354" + ], + "42128481": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 156" + ], + "42131728": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34" + ], + "42148553": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 323", + "Section 498A" + ], + "42154164": [ + "Section 228", + "Section 34", + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 409", + "Section 468" + ], + "421603": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 308", + "Section 300", + "Section 304" + ], + "1462098": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "14621028": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 332", + "Section 186", + "Section 354", + "Section 353" + ], + "1462333": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "146826374": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 148" + ], + "146830743": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323" + ], + "146835528": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 336", + "Section 148", + "Section 427", + "Section 341" + ], + "146845999": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "147212257": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "147219924": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 279" + ], + "7109170": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 307", + "Section 34" + ], + "53746583": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406" + ], + "53756698": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 379", + "Section 149" + ], + "53757858": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 120B", + "Section 5", + "Section 420", + "Section 471" + ], + "5376099": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 34", + "Section 188" + ], + "53768103": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 506" + ], + "537722": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "51477928": [ + "Section 4", + "Section 300", + "Section 3", + "Section 302" + ], + "137006149": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 147", + "Section 324", + "Section 148" + ], + "137030054": [ + "Section 164", + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 448" + ], + "1370353": [ + "Section 452" + ], + "118777590": [ + "Section 156", + "Section 34" + ], + "118802678": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 354" + ], + "1188031": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 307", + "Section 498A", + "Section 420", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 506", + "Section 147" + ], + "121304543": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 120B", + "Section 379" + ], + "16346453": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "1634671": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 148" + ], + "1634720": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "162260566": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "78270253": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 420", + "Section 34" + ], + "120979384": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 307", + "Section 341", + "Section 302" + ], + "12098599": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 306" + ], + "1209913": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 304", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 325", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 300" + ], + "121000014": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 148" + ], + "121002": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 452", + "Section 323" + ], + "347107": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 300", + "Section 304" + ], + "347113": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 482" + ], + "34713420": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 376" + ], + "36413779": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 324", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "37086918": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 3" + ], + "1005717": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 324" + ], + "1005722": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "100575312": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 415", + "Section 120B", + "Section 468" + ], + "10233920": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 366" + ], + "10237806": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294" + ], + "102717258": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 304" + ], + "100708656": [ + "Section 13" + ], + "100717218": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "100725536": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "106787370": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "264438": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 302" + ], + "26472": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 452", + "Section 326", + "Section 34", + "Section 304" + ], + "191223969": [ + "Section 332", + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 186" + ], + "1914804": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 307" + ], + "114637598": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 3", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 354" + ], + "1146403": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 109", + "Section 342" + ], + "114642010": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 394" + ], + "1146434": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 326", + "Section 342" + ], + "132033926": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 147" + ], + "711527": [ + "Section 500", + "Section 34" + ], + "71153503": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 482", + "Section 452", + "Section 323" + ], + "71161402": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 354", + "Section 341", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 326" + ], + "71166490": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 324", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "21552480": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "21552664": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 3" + ], + "152676349": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "1526802": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 326", + "Section 323", + "Section 307", + "Section 506" + ], + "152689365": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 504", + "Section 406", + "Section 302", + "Section 323" + ], + "152762080": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 504", + "Section 304", + "Section 397", + "Section 34" + ], + "152766123": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 365", + "Section 148", + "Section 506" + ], + "152767149": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 279" + ], + "152773112": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 420" + ], + "152774385": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 482", + "Section 415", + "Section 155", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 156" + ], + "152774861": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 363", + "Section 342", + "Section 384", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "15277571": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 506" + ], + "1378876": [ + "Section 419", + "Section 120B", + "Section 417", + "Section 465", + "Section 471", + "Section 120" + ], + "1379006": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 376", + "Section 324", + "Section 506" + ], + "51474008": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 164" + ], + "130812161": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "798923": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 143" + ], + "811249": [ + "Section 380" + ], + "811279": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 161", + "Section 468", + "Section 173", + "Section 467", + "Section 156", + "Section 415" + ], + "81141978": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 306", + "Section 506" + ], + "811531": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 326", + "Section 34", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 109", + "Section 323", + "Section 438" + ], + "82931458": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "14961617": [ + "Section 452" + ], + "149629239": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "149638391": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 320" + ], + "71804397": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "718070": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B" + ], + "71820": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 306" + ], + "71822740": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467" + ], + "718228": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 498", + "Section 304", + "Section 304B" + ], + "173559138": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 147" + ], + "173559849": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 376" + ], + "1079194": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "1079213": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 302" + ], + "43806777": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 342", + "Section 376", + "Section 5" + ], + "43815585": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 120B", + "Section 376" + ], + "438238": [ + "Section 5", + "Section 471", + "Section 467" + ], + "100038834": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 365", + "Section 366A", + "Section 465" + ], + "100097473": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 427", + "Section 147", + "Section 448", + "Section 379", + "Section 148", + "Section 336", + "Section 149", + "Section 447", + "Section 511", + "Section 307" + ], + "176109933": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 506", + "Section 406", + "Section 498A" + ], + "176110781": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 409" + ], + "1761133": [ + "Section 161" + ], + "176165139": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 500", + "Section 417" + ], + "359414": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 436", + "Section 302" + ], + "41347626": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 324" + ], + "41371155": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 307" + ], + "41295": [ + "Section 190" + ], + "413200": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 494", + "Section 320", + "Section 482" + ], + "698067": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 300", + "Section 302" + ], + "69820": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 364" + ], + "69823764": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 363", + "Section 120B", + "Section 201", + "Section 364" + ], + "697509": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "69765289": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 506" + ], + "69765535": [ + "Section 320", + "Section 326" + ], + "69771044": [ + "Section 395" + ], + "69772612": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 427", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 149", + "Section 186" + ], + "100423625": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "100428": [ + "Section 415", + "Section 417" + ], + "100435917": [ + "Section 229A" + ], + "1071741": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 109", + "Section 467", + "Section 193" + ], + "10718343": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "113392559": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "113414155": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 506", + "Section 304" + ], + "124702537": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 447", + "Section 147" + ], + "130918586": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "130928405": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "130959443": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 306", + "Section 34", + "Section 304" + ], + "130963977": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 375", + "Section 511" + ], + "1309690": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 109", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 34", + "Section 149" + ], + "130972888": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 498A", + "Section 326" + ], + "130974418": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 294", + "Section 229A", + "Section 147", + "Section 148" + ], + "138331878": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 504", + "Section 406", + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 120B", + "Section 506" + ], + "138349784": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 427", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 506" + ], + "1383503": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "148691067": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 304A", + "Section 337", + "Section 300", + "Section 338", + "Section 299", + "Section 320" + ], + "1486997": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 326", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 300" + ], + "148712356": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 506", + "Section 120B", + "Section 468", + "Section 307", + "Section 406", + "Section 471", + "Section 384", + "Section 148", + "Section 325", + "Section 149", + "Section 323", + "Section 147" + ], + "148721292": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 366A", + "Section 363", + "Section 506", + "Section 109", + "Section 34" + ], + "148726026": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 384" + ], + "148729058": [ + "Section 500", + "Section 420" + ], + "188220396": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 306", + "Section 294", + "Section 332" + ], + "1882338": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 468" + ], + "2169693": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A" + ], + "217": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "23626655": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "23629": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 149" + ], + "235725": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 465" + ], + "23584575": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 437", + "Section 120" + ], + "236018": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 302" + ], + "2361794": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 34", + "Section 417" + ], + "243132": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B" + ], + "24317035": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 420" + ], + "2499099": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "25005430": [ + "Section 395", + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "25020518": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 161", + "Section 313" + ], + "251213": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 304" + ], + "25131627": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 406", + "Section 498A" + ], + "25139155": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 427", + "Section 332" + ], + "25139644": [ + "Section 389" + ], + "301618": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "301771": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "301788": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 506" + ], + "32363005": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 366A" + ], + "32368": [ + "Section 120", + "Section 109", + "Section 324", + "Section 341", + "Section 337" + ], + "32371348": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 34", + "Section 438" + ], + "32434": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 149" + ], + "32437341": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 504" + ], + "32439": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 120", + "Section 419" + ], + "324617": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 409", + "Section 34" + ], + "33532746": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 188", + "Section 336", + "Section 148", + "Section 504", + "Section 341", + "Section 147", + "Section 34" + ], + "335377": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "335385": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 511" + ], + "335430": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 354", + "Section 511" + ], + "36722777": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "3672332": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "3672717": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 397", + "Section 379" + ], + "36734818": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 326" + ], + "36736141": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 306" + ], + "367375": [ + "Section 364", + "Section 201" + ], + "38736578": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 509", + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 506", + "Section 155" + ], + "38737539": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A", + "Section 306", + "Section 302" + ], + "387410": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "38750251": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 380", + "Section 332", + "Section 353" + ], + "38796146": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 149" + ], + "38811221": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 465", + "Section 406" + ], + "42941666": [ + "Section 395", + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 190" + ], + "42945": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "42950636": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294" + ], + "44153546": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 468" + ], + "44154742": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 420" + ], + "46000365": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306" + ], + "46001354": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 341" + ], + "46028237": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 300", + "Section 304" + ], + "46030964": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 437" + ], + "46137014": [ + "Section 436", + "Section 34", + "Section 504", + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 341" + ], + "46147245": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304" + ], + "46148766": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323" + ], + "46850747": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 148", + "Section 427", + "Section 149", + "Section 186" + ], + "46863260": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 509", + "Section 506" + ], + "46864405": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 302" + ], + "47884797": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 354", + "Section 323", + "Section 376" + ], + "478969": [ + "Section 313", + "Section 376", + "Section 302" + ], + "47919258": [ + "Section 419", + "Section 342", + "Section 420" + ], + "47690": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "47720638": [ + "Section 409" + ], + "47638314": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 320", + "Section 34" + ], + "47653209": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 306", + "Section 438", + "Section 34" + ], + "476694": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 376" + ], + "476786": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "5054855": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 468" + ], + "5055765": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "50624510": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 323", + "Section 506" + ], + "50632": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 506", + "Section 366", + "Section 120B", + "Section 504", + "Section 323" + ], + "50636735": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "50643215": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 452" + ], + "50671277": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "50691303": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 34" + ], + "3869343": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "38694299": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306" + ], + "386945": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 161", + "Section 313", + "Section 34" + ], + "387131": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 353" + ], + "38714361": [ + "Section 120", + "Section 409", + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 465", + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 406", + "Section 504" + ], + "38732782": [ + "Section 332", + "Section 353" + ], + "51334304": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 114", + "Section 354", + "Section 341", + "Section 323" + ], + "51353399": [ + "Section 304A" + ], + "51368819": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 4", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 34" + ], + "51374": [ + "Section 395" + ], + "51416986": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 500", + "Section 406", + "Section 482", + "Section 120B" + ], + "51418924": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 294", + "Section 323" + ], + "514332": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 325", + "Section 326", + "Section 324" + ], + "51434449": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "51438092": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 34" + ], + "51441270": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "514417": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 300", + "Section 302" + ], + "545493": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 471", + "Section 465", + "Section 302" + ], + "54549607": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 437", + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 342", + "Section 420", + "Section 394", + "Section 498A", + "Section 411", + "Section 471", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 354", + "Section 148", + "Section 468", + "Section 147", + "Section 149", + "Section 467" + ], + "54550686": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 188", + "Section 325", + "Section 427" + ], + "54578331": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 498A" + ], + "54580050": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 438" + ], + "54581855": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 375", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 511", + "Section 354" + ], + "54587880": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 324" + ], + "55261041": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 34", + "Section 332", + "Section 188", + "Section 186" + ], + "552734": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 201" + ], + "552780": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 148" + ], + "553253": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 326", + "Section 324" + ], + "553314": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 324", + "Section 326", + "Section 302" + ], + "55348475": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 13", + "Section 306", + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 411", + "Section 120" + ], + "60443156": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 498A" + ], + "60458718": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 498A", + "Section 506" + ], + "60468381": [ + "Section 494", + "Section 506" + ], + "578231": [ + "Section 164", + "Section 193" + ], + "57833868": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 308", + "Section 438", + "Section 34" + ], + "578571": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34" + ], + "57883792": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 427", + "Section 120B", + "Section 436" + ], + "578918": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 447", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 147" + ], + "57897255": [ + "Section 465", + "Section 120B" + ], + "57898906": [ + "Section 120", + "Section 471" + ], + "57899500": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 304", + "Section 323", + "Section 504" + ], + "57913260": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 409", + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 411" + ], + "5791488": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 190" + ], + "57916663": [ + "Section 509", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "57931793": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 392", + "Section 394" + ], + "579362": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 395", + "Section 397" + ], + "598766": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "6072573": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "607278": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 161" + ], + "607303": [ + "Section 494" + ], + "60733528": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 323", + "Section 114", + "Section 306", + "Section 149" + ], + "61225070": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 406" + ], + "61234786": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 326" + ], + "612416": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 394" + ], + "61252578": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 376", + "Section 498A" + ], + "61257999": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "61262107": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "61272521": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 498A" + ], + "61274": [ + "Section 5", + "Section 190", + "Section 4", + "Section 120B", + "Section 409", + "Section 193" + ], + "614358": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 120", + "Section 34", + "Section 397" + ], + "6060506": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "60615400": [ + "Section 509", + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A", + "Section 354" + ], + "60630092": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 506", + "Section 452" + ], + "64852991": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 506" + ], + "648566": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 506" + ], + "654412": [ + "Section 365", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 323", + "Section 364", + "Section 325" + ], + "65456148": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 323" + ], + "65462106": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "65470402": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "65474778": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 324", + "Section 299", + "Section 325", + "Section 326" + ], + "65478625": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 320", + "Section 323", + "Section 427", + "Section 341" + ], + "65481250": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 307", + "Section 34" + ], + "1010161": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 120" + ], + "67576229": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 341", + "Section 379", + "Section 34", + "Section 325" + ], + "6762257": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "71908569": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 300" + ], + "719109": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 313", + "Section 304", + "Section 149", + "Section 300", + "Section 465", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 34" + ], + "71931120": [ + "Section 375", + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 420", + "Section 376" + ], + "71939245": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 437" + ], + "71946925": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "73381470": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 155", + "Section 482", + "Section 156" + ], + "73413896": [ + "Section 389", + "Section 354" + ], + "73713329": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 419", + "Section 504", + "Section 506" + ], + "737280": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 302" + ], + "737489": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 375" + ], + "743366": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "74361411": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 427", + "Section 148", + "Section 332", + "Section 307", + "Section 353", + "Section 147", + "Section 186", + "Section 325" + ], + "75935750": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366A", + "Section 302" + ], + "78432281": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 341", + "Section 324", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "78619833": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 450", + "Section 307", + "Section 302" + ], + "7871891": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 120B" + ], + "78773263": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 294", + "Section 149" + ], + "78942340": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "75816262": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 120B", + "Section 114" + ], + "758173": [ + "Section 2", + "Section 161", + "Section 406" + ], + "7764983": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 324" + ], + "776623": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 324", + "Section 147" + ], + "77664": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 323" + ], + "776742": [ + "Section 494", + "Section 5", + "Section 4" + ], + "77541932": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 323" + ], + "775527": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "7756898": [ + "Section 173", + "Section 156", + "Section 324", + "Section 190", + "Section 332", + "Section 188", + "Section 482", + "Section 450", + "Section 506", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 436", + "Section 307", + "Section 353", + "Section 148" + ], + "77498143": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 394" + ], + "77511448": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 190", + "Section 504", + "Section 482" + ], + "77524951": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "77540338": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 366" + ], + "81282657": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "812865": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 147" + ], + "813088": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 397", + "Section 392", + "Section 457", + "Section 380", + "Section 394" + ], + "8138458": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420" + ], + "8139147": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 307" + ], + "8139368": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 406" + ], + "81401904": [ + "Section 5", + "Section 228", + "Section 420", + "Section 452", + "Section 427", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 120", + "Section 161", + "Section 384" + ], + "84340191": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "84371457": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 500" + ], + "822243": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 304" + ], + "841851": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "84202520": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 306" + ], + "842159": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "851682": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 109" + ], + "85185251": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 308", + "Section 506" + ], + "85151339": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 498A" + ], + "8515929": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 306", + "Section 323", + "Section 504" + ], + "851607": [ + "Section 161" + ], + "87847820": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 506", + "Section 498" + ], + "87855004": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 427", + "Section 336", + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "878569": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 471", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467" + ], + "879338": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 450", + "Section 506", + "Section 379", + "Section 341", + "Section 427" + ], + "87944070": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 354", + "Section 366" + ], + "886459": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 313", + "Section 148" + ], + "88666267": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 366" + ], + "88670230": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 147", + "Section 436", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 332", + "Section 120B", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 326", + "Section 149" + ], + "88681817": [ + "Section 229A" + ], + "886863": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 302" + ], + "92230092": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "92231315": [ + "Section 338", + "Section 34", + "Section 337" + ], + "922429": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "92257768": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "922643": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "93798981": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 34", + "Section 148", + "Section 120B", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A" + ], + "93799819": [ + "Section 279", + "Section 337", + "Section 304", + "Section 304A", + "Section 338" + ], + "9380274": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 376", + "Section 354" + ], + "93813742": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 506", + "Section 201" + ], + "93821664": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 147", + "Section 323" + ], + "939702": [ + "Section 364", + "Section 302", + "Section 376", + "Section 300" + ], + "93971686": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 324" + ], + "939763": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "93977515": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "94686229": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "94686376": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 506", + "Section 341" + ], + "9470112": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "81716407": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 120", + "Section 120B" + ], + "81720531": [ + "Section 13", + "Section 509" + ], + "81736776": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 299" + ], + "974446": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 324", + "Section 4", + "Section 304" + ], + "97448103": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 448", + "Section 506", + "Section 447", + "Section 34", + "Section 325" + ], + "974607": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 155", + "Section 120B", + "Section 156" + ], + "97464317": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 409", + "Section 406" + ], + "974735": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 147", + "Section 148" + ], + "98100888": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 392" + ], + "98109154": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 509", + "Section 34" + ], + "100643293": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 34" + ], + "1006440": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 452", + "Section 420", + "Section 34", + "Section 482" + ], + "10064875": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "1072623": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 342", + "Section 300", + "Section 307" + ], + "1072656": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "107270237": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 332", + "Section 506", + "Section 147", + "Section 353" + ], + "107420210": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 341", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 397" + ], + "107467641": [ + "Section 447", + "Section 294" + ], + "1074695": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304A", + "Section 306", + "Section 34", + "Section 506" + ], + "107489830": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "107494354": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 294" + ], + "1075006": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 498A" + ], + "101621193": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 511" + ], + "1016332": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 148" + ], + "101774779": [ + "Section 304B" + ], + "101785762": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 468" + ], + "101795556": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 406", + "Section 342", + "Section 34" + ], + "101853538": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 366", + "Section 34", + "Section 363" + ], + "102511605": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 417", + "Section 506" + ], + "102514574": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294" + ], + "103531754": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 34" + ], + "103536695": [ + "Section 363" + ], + "103537670": [ + "Section 120", + "Section 420" + ], + "1035472": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 302" + ], + "1035474": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107" + ], + "1053131": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 417", + "Section 120B", + "Section 302" + ], + "105315": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "1053510": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 313" + ], + "105358034": [ + "Section 419", + "Section 34", + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 506" + ], + "105362410": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 326" + ], + "105364457": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "108697": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 147" + ], + "108706669": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 120" + ], + "108723945": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107" + ], + "108728085": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 149" + ], + "109985722": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 325", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 304", + "Section 143", + "Section 300", + "Section 307" + ], + "11000653": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "110018089": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 450" + ], + "1100279": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 325" + ], + "1100330": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 375", + "Section 498" + ], + "111251": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 4", + "Section 188", + "Section 200" + ], + "1112516": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 304", + "Section 109" + ], + "111255690": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 436", + "Section 323", + "Section 149" + ], + "11125679": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 173", + "Section 482", + "Section 324", + "Section 156", + "Section 155" + ], + "111274246": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 342", + "Section 107", + "Section 376", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 354", + "Section 506" + ], + "111284850": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294" + ], + "1112856": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 506", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B" + ], + "111299881": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 336", + "Section 338", + "Section 34", + "Section 320" + ], + "1113057": [ + "Section 313", + "Section 342", + "Section 325", + "Section 376" + ], + "111320438": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 307" + ], + "1113244": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "112867752": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 506", + "Section 376" + ], + "1145717": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 452" + ], + "114595679": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 341", + "Section 302", + "Section 147" + ], + "1145983": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 302" + ], + "114604675": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "1146091": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 161", + "Section 164", + "Section 148", + "Section 302" + ], + "114619901": [ + "Section 363" + ], + "1102601": [ + "Section 308", + "Section 504", + "Section 325", + "Section 304", + "Section 323", + "Section 307" + ], + "115921267": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "115935264": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 304A", + "Section 506" + ], + "115946373": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "115951110": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 364", + "Section 498A", + "Section 201", + "Section 366", + "Section 120B", + "Section 109" + ], + "115967851": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 186", + "Section 143" + ], + "115968049": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 34", + "Section 482" + ], + "116799905": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "116800325": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366A", + "Section 376" + ], + "116820033": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 504", + "Section 304", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "1168300": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 201", + "Section 364", + "Section 34" + ], + "117619245": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "1176429": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "117648850": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 323" + ], + "117554105": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 279", + "Section 304", + "Section 379" + ], + "1175687": [ + "Section 304B" + ], + "1175722": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 149" + ], + "1175744": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "117575700": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 506", + "Section 498" + ], + "1175844": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 506" + ], + "117593831": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 438", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "1176041": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 394" + ], + "120766582": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 308", + "Section 324", + "Section 320" + ], + "1207680": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "12077554": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A" + ], + "120776417": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 13" + ], + "1213960": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 302" + ], + "121407855": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 366" + ], + "121418858": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 506", + "Section 4", + "Section 406", + "Section 3", + "Section 482", + "Section 504", + "Section 323" + ], + "12142443": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "1214275": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 34", + "Section 313", + "Section 302", + "Section 498A" + ], + "121427751": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 120B" + ], + "121476995": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 307" + ], + "123572492": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 395" + ], + "1222748": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1222842": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 409", + "Section 415" + ], + "1222853": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 436", + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "1222878": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 336", + "Section 148", + "Section 363", + "Section 427" + ], + "128692517": [ + "Section 107", + "Section 306" + ], + "128704330": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 304", + "Section 506", + "Section 498A", + "Section 155", + "Section 120B", + "Section 107", + "Section 34", + "Section 306", + "Section 324", + "Section 156", + "Section 307", + "Section 320", + "Section 323" + ], + "128718323": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 452" + ], + "128736266": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 34", + "Section 366A" + ], + "128739495": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 306" + ], + "1287454": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 304", + "Section 299" + ], + "138397004": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 120B", + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "138456932": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 468" + ], + "138470181": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 306", + "Section 107", + "Section 201" + ], + "138472": [ + "Section 395", + "Section 397" + ], + "138483537": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 482", + "Section 155", + "Section 156" + ], + "134297889": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 364", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 395" + ], + "134312193": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 506" + ], + "134317817": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 406" + ], + "134323496": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "135776383": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 417", + "Section 147" + ], + "135806185": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 363", + "Section 366A" + ], + "135823057": [ + "Section 173", + "Section 406", + "Section 419", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 34" + ], + "139202486": [ + "Section 436", + "Section 353", + "Section 332" + ], + "139215008": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 342", + "Section 366" + ], + "1398781": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 164" + ], + "139881755": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 148", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 452", + "Section 147" + ], + "13990110": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 193", + "Section 471", + "Section 34", + "Section 200" + ], + "139912315": [ + "Section 332", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "139918588": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 326", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 323" + ], + "139926430": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 307", + "Section 294" + ], + "1432787": [ + "Section 188" + ], + "144695419": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "144698062": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 307" + ], + "136331337": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 394", + "Section 294" + ], + "1363325": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "136334106": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 438", + "Section 506" + ], + "13635664": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 394" + ], + "145676911": [ + "Section 228" + ], + "146241257": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 313", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 307", + "Section 323" + ], + "1466857": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 419", + "Section 420", + "Section 397", + "Section 415" + ], + "147060393": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 498A", + "Section 306" + ], + "147645378": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 34", + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 147", + "Section 114" + ], + "147676863": [ + "Section 156", + "Section 406", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 420", + "Section 34" + ], + "147683227": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 509", + "Section 406", + "Section 354", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "151234827": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 294" + ], + "151238649": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "152048373": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "152055689": [ + "Section 308", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 324", + "Section 34" + ], + "156408952": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 308", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "157797217": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "1568179": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "157113747": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 332" + ], + "159102206": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "159108363": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 438", + "Section 294" + ], + "15911776": [ + "Section 389" + ], + "159002547": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 457", + "Section 392", + "Section 395" + ], + "161904818": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 279" + ], + "162361029": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 447", + "Section 379", + "Section 34", + "Section 325" + ], + "1624948": [ + "Section 395" + ], + "1607753": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "1607810": [ + "Section 500" + ], + "160849473": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "160865945": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 511", + "Section 415" + ], + "1608014": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 34", + "Section 120B", + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 302" + ], + "160805876": [ + "Section 229A" + ], + "160807689": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "160810464": [ + "Section 465", + "Section 419", + "Section 420" + ], + "164996907": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 438" + ], + "16944235": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 365", + "Section 363", + "Section 438" + ], + "1694996": [ + "Section 114", + "Section 504", + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "16950076": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 471", + "Section 468" + ], + "170001543": [ + "Section 494" + ], + "1700067": [ + "Section 500", + "Section 13" + ], + "170009313": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 448" + ], + "1700132": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "1700214": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 299", + "Section 300", + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 302", + "Section 392" + ], + "1700285": [ + "Section 397" + ], + "170688912": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 2" + ], + "170705475": [ + "Section 120B" + ], + "170707183": [ + "Section 306" + ], + "172000975": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304" + ], + "1728608": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 148", + "Section 149" + ], + "172897588": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 147", + "Section 341", + "Section 149" + ], + "172930019": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "172946455": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 302" + ], + "172967691": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 452", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 427" + ], + "1729759": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 109", + "Section 5" + ], + "187090": [ + "Section 193" + ], + "187090619": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 326", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 324", + "Section 307" + ], + "1871117": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 148" + ], + "187114932": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506" + ], + "187120161": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 320", + "Section 498" + ], + "188665783": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 326" + ], + "188668027": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "188681918": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 394" + ], + "153033673": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 306", + "Section 107", + "Section 34" + ], + "153043729": [ + "Section 509", + "Section 506", + "Section 341", + "Section 325" + ], + "153047275": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 147" + ], + "156152673": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "159654128": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 419" + ], + "159670067": [ + "Section 457", + "Section 380", + "Section 411", + "Section 188", + "Section 120B" + ], + "164713797": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 332", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 353", + "Section 294" + ], + "164724698": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "164736943": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 294", + "Section 34" + ], + "1924008": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 5", + "Section 468" + ], + "192402377": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 120B", + "Section 323", + "Section 354", + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "192413907": [ + "Section 300" + ], + "1923361": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "192362": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 120", + "Section 397", + "Section 114" + ], + "192378345": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1952637": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 392", + "Section 394" + ], + "195268601": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120B" + ], + "1965734": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 300" + ], + "1871757": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 109", + "Section 4", + "Section 353", + "Section 465", + "Section 471", + "Section 149", + "Section 201", + "Section 114", + "Section 120", + "Section 120B", + "Section 468", + "Section 3" + ], + "1871920": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 324", + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "187194": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 395", + "Section 147", + "Section 161", + "Section 452", + "Section 148", + "Section 308", + "Section 324" + ], + "18719481": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 504", + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 302" + ], + "187197": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 323", + "Section 452" + ], + "18720566": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1872085": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 392", + "Section 380" + ], + "199645385": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 306", + "Section 438" + ], + "199662463": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120", + "Section 420", + "Section 201" + ], + "1998131": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 302" + ], + "25268301": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 34", + "Section 376", + "Section 354" + ], + "25305876": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107" + ], + "253131": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 149", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "253270": [ + "Section 397" + ], + "25328436": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 304", + "Section 308" + ], + "27282966": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 120B" + ], + "272877": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 379" + ], + "27309037": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 3", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "26271971": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 120B", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 427" + ], + "26282486": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 498A", + "Section 354", + "Section 406", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "2628575": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 420" + ], + "26220073": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "329314": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 173", + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 155", + "Section 120B", + "Section 409", + "Section 34", + "Section 415", + "Section 156", + "Section 13" + ], + "33063846": [ + "Section 143", + "Section 149", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 436", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "330704": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 161", + "Section 409" + ], + "330737": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 471", + "Section 200", + "Section 188" + ], + "33104": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 471" + ], + "331132": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 299", + "Section 304" + ], + "34326051": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 34", + "Section 437", + "Section 307" + ], + "34332653": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 120B" + ], + "34337407": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "34789410": [ + "Section 229A" + ], + "34795419": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 34" + ], + "34810851": [ + "Section 494", + "Section 155", + "Section 2", + "Section 498", + "Section 200", + "Section 156" + ], + "348234": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 380" + ], + "34823504": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 363", + "Section 201", + "Section 376" + ], + "34834595": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420" + ], + "368852": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 3", + "Section 34" + ], + "368861": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 452", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 34" + ], + "396724": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 147", + "Section 504", + "Section 2", + "Section 506", + "Section 395", + "Section 427", + "Section 397", + "Section 323" + ], + "39683617": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 294" + ], + "39690719": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "39754900": [ + "Section 308", + "Section 448", + "Section 323", + "Section 354", + "Section 307" + ], + "39755272": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 34", + "Section 107", + "Section 307" + ], + "39761738": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 406", + "Section 420" + ], + "39694587": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 471" + ], + "39732898": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34" + ], + "41677185": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 147" + ], + "41804731": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 467", + "Section 506", + "Section 419", + "Section 452", + "Section 504", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 468" + ], + "41957333": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "405010": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 504", + "Section 313", + "Section 161", + "Section 506", + "Section 302" + ], + "40506278": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 465" + ], + "40508503": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 147", + "Section 366", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 149", + "Section 363", + "Section 342", + "Section 364", + "Section 375" + ], + "40354703": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "40359998": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 143" + ], + "40360780": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 498A" + ], + "40371276": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 120" + ], + "403136": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 307" + ], + "40315": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 120B" + ], + "4825813": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 384", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 120", + "Section 120B" + ], + "48259893": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "48286625": [ + "Section 364", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 313" + ], + "482937": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B" + ], + "48215017": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 448", + "Section 34", + "Section 341", + "Section 509" + ], + "48239138": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 437" + ], + "48241719": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "48920466": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 109" + ], + "4892052": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 366A", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 34", + "Section 363" + ], + "48920608": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 406", + "Section 448", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "48929989": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 323", + "Section 306" + ], + "473915": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 342", + "Section 457", + "Section 354" + ], + "47407450": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 34" + ], + "47408473": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 279", + "Section 506", + "Section 447", + "Section 302" + ], + "519630": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 34" + ], + "590785": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 325", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "59087055": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "59095109": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 506", + "Section 326", + "Section 307" + ], + "59115508": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 437" + ], + "68255769": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "68263471": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "6827104": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "68296433": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 500", + "Section 504", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34" + ], + "683020": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 411" + ], + "68335085": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 307" + ], + "68342100": [ + "Section 365", + "Section 363", + "Section 376" + ], + "68819254": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300" + ], + "688309": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 395", + "Section 341", + "Section 326", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "68837220": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 120B", + "Section 354", + "Section 438" + ], + "68844103": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A", + "Section 504", + "Section 308", + "Section 325", + "Section 323" + ], + "761268": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "7605550": [ + "Section 320", + "Section 353", + "Section 427", + "Section 325", + "Section 34" + ], + "76073925": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 427", + "Section 506", + "Section 336", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 341" + ], + "76082867": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 148" + ], + "76085708": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 457" + ], + "76088698": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 279", + "Section 337" + ], + "84280837": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 427", + "Section 323", + "Section 120B" + ], + "84283937": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 498A" + ], + "843098": [ + "Section 395" + ], + "8433": [ + "Section 389", + "Section 506" + ], + "8434": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "8533877": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 341", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 326" + ], + "85344850": [ + "Section 509", + "Section 34" + ], + "85361130": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 506", + "Section 437", + "Section 294" + ], + "853707": [ + "Section 5", + "Section 471", + "Section 120B", + "Section 409" + ], + "853716": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 164", + "Section 114", + "Section 149", + "Section 307" + ], + "8610820": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 406", + "Section 320" + ], + "86117592": [ + "Section 450", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "86121715": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 149" + ], + "927923": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 307" + ], + "99227098": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 326", + "Section 34" + ], + "106418927": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 34" + ], + "106435246": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 326" + ], + "106438728": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 320", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1063853": [ + "Section 395" + ], + "1063942": [ + "Section 161" + ], + "1064031": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306" + ], + "106413342": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 34" + ], + "106413453": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 294" + ], + "1217844": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 500" + ], + "1217872": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 313" + ], + "123932709": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 228", + "Section 34", + "Section 107" + ], + "1239375": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 34" + ], + "12395179": [ + "Section 13" + ], + "12396": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1239742": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 332", + "Section 148" + ], + "123976154": [ + "Section 511", + "Section 506" + ], + "1239862": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467" + ], + "1239867": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 323" + ], + "1239882": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 147", + "Section 143", + "Section 148", + "Section 341", + "Section 324", + "Section 114", + "Section 417" + ], + "1239971": [ + "Section 409" + ], + "124006493": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 341", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 34" + ], + "129587041": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 325", + "Section 324", + "Section 354", + "Section 341" + ], + "129596938": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "129470646": [ + "Section 156", + "Section 465", + "Section 120", + "Section 420" + ], + "1294869": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 149" + ], + "129489221": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 452", + "Section 294", + "Section 341" + ], + "1294403": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 366", + "Section 324", + "Section 336", + "Section 376", + "Section 120B" + ], + "129445187": [ + "Section 465", + "Section 417", + "Section 420", + "Section 34", + "Section 409", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 467" + ], + "129447918": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 34" + ], + "129463180": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 452", + "Section 307", + "Section 336" + ], + "130551966": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 294" + ], + "1312948": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 120B", + "Section 384", + "Section 419", + "Section 380", + "Section 120" + ], + "13131238": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 120B" + ], + "1351065": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 306", + "Section 120B", + "Section 342", + "Section 392", + "Section 34" + ], + "1351355": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 304A" + ], + "135140": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 326" + ], + "135159866": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "1367766": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 306", + "Section 498A" + ], + "136796469": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 504", + "Section 324", + "Section 34" + ], + "13643493": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 302" + ], + "136674108": [ + "Section 397" + ], + "1375683": [ + "Section 143", + "Section 148", + "Section 332", + "Section 427", + "Section 147" + ], + "1375862": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 392", + "Section 397", + "Section 342", + "Section 411" + ], + "137435616": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 438" + ], + "13743836": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 326", + "Section 307" + ], + "137454206": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 326" + ], + "137463921": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 300" + ], + "137401601": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 448" + ], + "137410258": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 511" + ], + "137416289": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 447", + "Section 147" + ], + "137424896": [ + "Section 156", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 342", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 504" + ], + "1374313": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 465", + "Section 471", + "Section 409", + "Section 468", + "Section 173" + ], + "1466448": [ + "Section 409" + ], + "15658015": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "1565831": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 498" + ], + "156586685": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 409" + ], + "1565923": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 325" + ], + "1567224": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 34" + ], + "156738162": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 354", + "Section 509" + ], + "156778449": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 326", + "Section 506" + ], + "159260980": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 332" + ], + "159266345": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 364", + "Section 120B", + "Section 379" + ], + "159235810": [ + "Section 457", + "Section 380", + "Section 411", + "Section 114", + "Section 379" + ], + "161552656": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 363" + ], + "161496775": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 363" + ], + "1615282": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 427", + "Section 471", + "Section 120B", + "Section 395" + ], + "161531083": [ + "Section 186", + "Section 34", + "Section 353", + "Section 308" + ], + "16236597": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 325" + ], + "162375861": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 465", + "Section 468", + "Section 471" + ], + "162381698": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 354", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 504" + ], + "162382342": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 406", + "Section 467", + "Section 482" + ], + "1623865": [ + "Section 366A", + "Section 366", + "Section 109", + "Section 34" + ], + "162416981": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "162424332": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "181828996": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 354" + ], + "181830503": [ + "Section 511", + "Section 109", + "Section 500", + "Section 200", + "Section 482" + ], + "181833066": [ + "Section 279", + "Section 337", + "Section 304", + "Section 338" + ], + "187480620": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 498A" + ], + "187480761": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 326", + "Section 323", + "Section 325" + ], + "187563350": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300" + ], + "1875006": [ + "Section 447", + "Section 147" + ], + "1875262": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306" + ], + "198199317": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 375", + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "198201465": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 304B", + "Section 34", + "Section 107" + ], + "1981560": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 364", + "Section 307", + "Section 325" + ], + "198157163": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 201" + ], + "1981596": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 353", + "Section 34", + "Section 186", + "Section 307" + ], + "198208470": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 332", + "Section 307", + "Section 353" + ], + "198215532": [ + "Section 173", + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 419" + ], + "198227145": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 411" + ], + "198230936": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 325", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 406" + ], + "20070861": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A" + ], + "20087353": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 409", + "Section 161", + "Section 120B", + "Section 471", + "Section 465" + ], + "200996": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 304", + "Section 164" + ], + "20113760": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 323" + ], + "20149041": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 500", + "Section 448", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 354", + "Section 143", + "Section 447" + ], + "20213627": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 143", + "Section 332", + "Section 34", + "Section 186" + ], + "20234495": [ + "Section 143", + "Section 149", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 307" + ], + "20573483": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "20578546": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "20259330": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "20613490": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "20497845": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 299", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 323", + "Section 341", + "Section 307" + ], + "20507650": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 34", + "Section 379", + "Section 504" + ], + "205181": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 452", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 436", + "Section 148", + "Section 395", + "Section 427", + "Section 326", + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 147" + ], + "20523387": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 114", + "Section 427", + "Section 323", + "Section 354" + ], + "20542031": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 294", + "Section 506" + ], + "20562585": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 307", + "Section 397" + ], + "20628190": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 436", + "Section 325", + "Section 34" + ], + "20670404": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 438" + ], + "20681098": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 201", + "Section 465", + "Section 411" + ], + "20684222": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 509", + "Section 506" + ], + "20691794": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 406" + ], + "20693756": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 448", + "Section 326", + "Section 379", + "Section 325" + ], + "1948646": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 34" + ], + "194903453": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323" + ], + "194914590": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 201", + "Section 471", + "Section 120B", + "Section 304" + ], + "198600411": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 471" + ], + "198604270": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 143" + ], + "198606488": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "198612728": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "20819499": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "20834763": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 365", + "Section 34", + "Section 438" + ], + "22877038": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "209472": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "209598": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 326", + "Section 341", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "210051": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 5" + ], + "21006095": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 323", + "Section 320", + "Section 482", + "Section 354" + ], + "20907229": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 406", + "Section 320", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "20910325": [ + "Section 304A" + ], + "20913765": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 120B", + "Section 364", + "Section 365", + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "209246": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 149", + "Section 506" + ], + "22127455": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 34" + ], + "22151687": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 448", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "2243141": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 307" + ], + "22441535": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 509", + "Section 384" + ], + "22608748": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 2", + "Section 302" + ], + "2260920": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 438", + "Section 467" + ], + "22625": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 161" + ], + "52092562": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 341" + ], + "521213": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 498" + ], + "64697233": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 34", + "Section 308", + "Section 354", + "Section 326" + ], + "21377058": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 149" + ], + "21377600": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 406" + ], + "21377614": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 406" + ], + "213799": [ + "Section 320", + "Section 326" + ], + "213928": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 392", + "Section 201", + "Section 417", + "Section 447", + "Section 376", + "Section 323" + ], + "21396471": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 437", + "Section 294", + "Section 506" + ], + "21397366": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "21417824": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 294" + ], + "214217": [ + "Section 417", + "Section 465", + "Section 471", + "Section 415", + "Section 420" + ], + "21479356": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 341", + "Section 323" + ], + "211461": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 326" + ], + "21155202": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 304B" + ], + "21070591": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "21072039": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 376" + ], + "21085380": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 482", + "Section 304", + "Section 4" + ], + "211051": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 397", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 325", + "Section 504", + "Section 395" + ], + "21107079": [ + "Section 494", + "Section 34" + ], + "21107328": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 307", + "Section 342", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "21183753": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 498A" + ], + "211874": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A", + "Section 302" + ], + "212077": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 324", + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 397" + ], + "21213": [ + "Section 188" + ], + "2121626": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "212245": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 149" + ], + "21622": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 109", + "Section 107" + ], + "21633908": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 452", + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 147" + ], + "215623": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 450", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 34", + "Section 307" + ], + "21572465": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 379" + ], + "21575893": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 415", + "Section 155", + "Section 156", + "Section 482", + "Section 120B" + ], + "21582605": [ + "Section 509", + "Section 323", + "Section 341" + ], + "216105": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 394", + "Section 304", + "Section 34", + "Section 313" + ], + "21655": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 304", + "Section 201", + "Section 299", + "Section 308", + "Section 161" + ], + "21666290": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 366", + "Section 375" + ], + "21306714": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "217798": [ + "Section 279", + "Section 304A", + "Section 337", + "Section 338" + ], + "21802375": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 420" + ], + "21721606": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "21723495": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A" + ], + "21729900": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 324", + "Section 147", + "Section 447", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 353" + ], + "21746009": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A", + "Section 107" + ], + "217501": [ + "Section 306" + ], + "21754502": [ + "Section 332", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 34", + "Section 353" + ], + "21757": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 114", + "Section 326", + "Section 148", + "Section 299" + ], + "212761": [ + "Section 201" + ], + "21276467": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "212946": [ + "Section 200", + "Section 2" + ], + "213020": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 341" + ], + "218143": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 120B", + "Section 468", + "Section 409", + "Section 4", + "Section 471" + ], + "218260": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 324" + ], + "22267371": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 376", + "Section 164", + "Section 438" + ], + "22285173": [ + "Section 366A", + "Section 363", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "22059494": [ + "Section 509", + "Section 120B", + "Section 376" + ], + "22061949": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 320" + ], + "21935609": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "219643": [ + "Section 364", + "Section 164" + ], + "21964350": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 448", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "21978213": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 341", + "Section 326", + "Section 379", + "Section 324", + "Section 307" + ], + "22001009": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34" + ], + "220188": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 299", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 307" + ], + "220229": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 120B", + "Section 409", + "Section 201", + "Section 411" + ], + "22069618": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 34", + "Section 438" + ], + "22076808": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "22083637": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 302", + "Section 366", + "Section 304" + ], + "22090463": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 161", + "Section 164" + ], + "2209197": [ + "Section 173", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 420" + ], + "22100220": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 354" + ], + "22313657": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 506" + ], + "22379720": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 419" + ], + "2238637": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 354" + ], + "22389193": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 498A", + "Section 302" + ], + "22395592": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 376", + "Section 34" + ], + "22398554": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 506", + "Section 406", + "Section 494" + ], + "22458876": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 34", + "Section 397" + ], + "224603": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 506", + "Section 365" + ], + "224652": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 299", + "Section 307" + ], + "23411": [ + "Section 228", + "Section 193" + ], + "23548929": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A", + "Section 354", + "Section 452" + ], + "62502149": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 307" + ], + "63851455": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 397", + "Section 34" + ], + "65652838": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 341" + ], + "2248261": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 324" + ], + "22495643": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 109", + "Section 5", + "Section 120B", + "Section 406" + ], + "226928": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 109", + "Section 304" + ], + "22726947": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 323" + ], + "22737499": [ + "Section 509", + "Section 506", + "Section 511", + "Section 376", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "227535": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "22753581": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 307" + ], + "227556": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 498A" + ], + "22824704": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 324" + ], + "22828512": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 34" + ], + "22832280": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 143" + ], + "22835064": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 341", + "Section 427", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 294" + ], + "22843330": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304" + ], + "228471": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 161", + "Section 307", + "Section 313" + ], + "22864762": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 471", + "Section 468" + ], + "228672": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "22964": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 450", + "Section 395" + ], + "22967115": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 34" + ], + "229672": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 341", + "Section 147" + ], + "22978983": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "22984129": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 34", + "Section 394" + ], + "23011087": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 306" + ], + "231108": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 302" + ], + "23127171": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 420" + ], + "23034265": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 380", + "Section 120B", + "Section 411" + ], + "284803": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 465", + "Section 471" + ], + "232772": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 482", + "Section 409", + "Section 120B" + ], + "23277691": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "232548": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 120B", + "Section 13" + ], + "23264488": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 452", + "Section 498A" + ], + "23265724": [ + "Section 2", + "Section 498A" + ], + "23270556": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 306", + "Section 323", + "Section 506" + ], + "231405": [ + "Section 313", + "Section 324", + "Section 302" + ], + "23151020": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 320" + ], + "23155481": [ + "Section 498A" + ], + "23165635": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 323" + ], + "29290330": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 143" + ], + "292978": [ + "Section 161" + ], + "29311207": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 302" + ], + "29327216": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 294", + "Section 450", + "Section 307" + ], + "295763": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 498A" + ], + "29767962": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 320", + "Section 325", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 482", + "Section 143", + "Section 3", + "Section 324" + ], + "29769023": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 498" + ], + "29525354": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 320" + ], + "295275": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "29544758": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 300" + ], + "29545929": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "295612": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 326" + ], + "23312345": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 457", + "Section 511", + "Section 397" + ], + "23324409": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 482", + "Section 320", + "Section 34" + ], + "23338773": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 366", + "Section 363" + ], + "233400": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 325", + "Section 323" + ], + "233509": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 366", + "Section 365", + "Section 109", + "Section 375" + ], + "23362159": [ + "Section 365", + "Section 506", + "Section 438", + "Section 342", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "234558": [ + "Section 447", + "Section 323", + "Section 307", + "Section 326" + ], + "2346459": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 190", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 143" + ], + "23491404": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 304", + "Section 147" + ], + "23502763": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "236804": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "236946": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "23699449": [ + "Section 465", + "Section 471", + "Section 409" + ], + "23710611": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 341", + "Section 307" + ], + "23725597": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 448", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "237257": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 34" + ], + "237349": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 302" + ], + "23406240": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 427", + "Section 294", + "Section 336" + ], + "234082": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 364", + "Section 2", + "Section 34", + "Section 397" + ], + "234105": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 437", + "Section 436", + "Section 457", + "Section 380", + "Section 450", + "Section 411" + ], + "23855564": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 326" + ], + "23798360": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 366", + "Section 363" + ], + "23809051": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 304", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 336", + "Section 504", + "Section 148" + ], + "25482261": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 308", + "Section 300" + ], + "25488908": [ + "Section 173", + "Section 190", + "Section 200", + "Section 156" + ], + "26094445": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 448", + "Section 506" + ], + "26107364": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "26114358": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 34" + ], + "239483": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 149", + "Section 120", + "Section 148", + "Section 109", + "Section 411" + ], + "23978328": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 120B", + "Section 498A" + ], + "24056605": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 366", + "Section 375" + ], + "24064123": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 365", + "Section 34", + "Section 411" + ], + "240653": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "24082932": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "24097191": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 511" + ], + "24109515": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B" + ], + "241103": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 326" + ], + "24116398": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 353", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 332", + "Section 323" + ], + "246753": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "24677336": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 394", + "Section 341", + "Section 294" + ], + "24679743": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 427", + "Section 336", + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "24683182": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323" + ], + "246851": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 120B" + ], + "238697": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 465" + ], + "23875630": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 341", + "Section 294" + ], + "238832": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 304B", + "Section 34", + "Section 437" + ], + "238967": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 304B", + "Section 302" + ], + "238975": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 341" + ], + "23901723": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 341", + "Section 506" + ], + "24393179": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 452" + ], + "24690": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302" + ], + "24368036": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "244079": [ + "Section 2", + "Section 4", + "Section 107", + "Section 3", + "Section 279", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "244096": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 468", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304", + "Section 467", + "Section 420" + ], + "244149": [ + "Section 395" + ], + "2441610": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 342", + "Section 354", + "Section 376", + "Section 323", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 302" + ], + "24430963": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 332", + "Section 120B" + ], + "24546850": [ + "Section 186", + "Section 353" + ], + "24562246": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 302", + "Section 498A" + ], + "24570390": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 294" + ], + "245758": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 366", + "Section 392" + ], + "24587092": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 376" + ], + "246010": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 452", + "Section 323" + ], + "24619638": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 406", + "Section 498A" + ], + "24754447": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "24758610": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 120B", + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "24786693": [ + "Section 186", + "Section 506" + ], + "247968": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 307" + ], + "24802671": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 506" + ], + "248181": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 307", + "Section 452" + ], + "24820138": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 354" + ], + "24727293": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 465" + ], + "24736366": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 452", + "Section 354" + ], + "24741778": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 498A", + "Section 307" + ], + "24742184": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 438" + ], + "24747995": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 279" + ], + "24919081": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "24920831": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 498", + "Section 323" + ], + "24935678": [ + "Section 279", + "Section 337", + "Section 304", + "Section 304A" + ], + "24944991": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 509", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 341" + ], + "24963352": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "24965": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 307" + ], + "25037204": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "25044977": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 294", + "Section 437", + "Section 34" + ], + "25047810": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 147", + "Section 229A", + "Section 148" + ], + "250611": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 341", + "Section 302" + ], + "252021": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 3", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 149" + ], + "25209535": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 420", + "Section 341", + "Section 494", + "Section 417", + "Section 376" + ], + "25220929": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 201" + ], + "25225646": [ + "Section 156", + "Section 190", + "Section 420", + "Section 200", + "Section 419", + "Section 468", + "Section 482", + "Section 34" + ], + "25249795": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 320", + "Section 452", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 173" + ], + "252533": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 107" + ], + "25262498": [ + "Section 228" + ], + "25503530": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 419" + ], + "25516868": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 394", + "Section 34" + ], + "253787": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107" + ], + "254131": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 120B", + "Section 302" + ], + "2541436": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 471", + "Section 468" + ], + "2542168": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 313", + "Section 34", + "Section 415", + "Section 109" + ], + "25455844": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 498" + ], + "25540080": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 3" + ], + "25814314": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 376" + ], + "25854839": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 308", + "Section 452" + ], + "25677009": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 34", + "Section 447", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 354", + "Section 326" + ], + "25680361": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 148" + ], + "256645": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 149" + ], + "25666662": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 498A", + "Section 323", + "Section 324" + ], + "256693": [ + "Section 304A" + ], + "257227": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 498A" + ], + "25728717": [ + "Section 320", + "Section 482", + "Section 506" + ], + "25744529": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 336", + "Section 506" + ], + "2576068": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 438" + ], + "25784215": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 506" + ], + "258014": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "25812198": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 326", + "Section 147", + "Section 341", + "Section 506" + ], + "25863828": [ + "Section 156", + "Section 2", + "Section 34" + ], + "25881340": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 304A" + ], + "25881473": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 143", + "Section 341", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 427", + "Section 4" + ], + "258994": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A" + ], + "25905495": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 341", + "Section 147" + ], + "25906856": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 34" + ], + "25951444": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "259831": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 302" + ], + "26341843": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 438" + ], + "263801": [ + "Section 332", + "Section 147", + "Section 379", + "Section 149", + "Section 148" + ], + "26289": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 506" + ], + "263958": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 186" + ], + "264005": [ + "Section 120B" + ], + "26427056": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "26427267": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "26432027": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "265374": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 436", + "Section 504", + "Section 506" + ], + "265686": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 354", + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 313" + ], + "265738": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467", + "Section 200", + "Section 417", + "Section 155" + ], + "26495735": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "26507486": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "26513541": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 379", + "Section 376", + "Section 366" + ], + "2667188": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 34" + ], + "266735": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 506" + ], + "26680979": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "26685391": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 3", + "Section 148" + ], + "26752": [ + "Section 415", + "Section 419", + "Section 420", + "Section 465" + ], + "26756": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 471" + ], + "26756962": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 427" + ], + "267597": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 482" + ], + "26764094": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 419", + "Section 468" + ], + "26768576": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "26892882": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 307", + "Section 323" + ], + "2691118": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 380", + "Section 384" + ], + "60073495": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 324", + "Section 341" + ], + "60082966": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376" + ], + "600847": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 302" + ], + "60094894": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 120B", + "Section 506" + ], + "27008302": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 325", + "Section 504", + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 304", + "Section 465" + ], + "270343": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "27042921": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A" + ], + "26948178": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "27109684": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 498A" + ], + "265365": [ + "Section 120B" + ], + "27146594": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 306", + "Section 201" + ], + "271574": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 307" + ], + "27192200": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 304", + "Section 302" + ], + "272037": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 397", + "Section 392", + "Section 302" + ], + "274915": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 313", + "Section 307" + ], + "27491868": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 409", + "Section 467" + ], + "27517895": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 302", + "Section 364", + "Section 34" + ], + "26145239": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306" + ], + "273343": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 392", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 332", + "Section 34" + ], + "273583": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 307", + "Section 302" + ], + "273747": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 364", + "Section 384" + ], + "27473": [ + "Section 228" + ], + "27733718": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 342" + ], + "277400": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "27747281": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 324", + "Section 427", + "Section 447" + ], + "27763887": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 498A" + ], + "27683471": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 336", + "Section 332", + "Section 149" + ], + "27726153": [ + "Section 320", + "Section 201" + ], + "27616433": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 506" + ], + "27622233": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 13" + ], + "276231": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 467", + "Section 409" + ], + "27543241": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 326", + "Section 186" + ], + "27597107": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "27601": [ + "Section 173", + "Section 190" + ], + "27788261": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 34" + ], + "27799112": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 143", + "Section 341", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 384", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 395", + "Section 379" + ], + "27847": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 306", + "Section 438", + "Section 498A" + ], + "278611": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 323" + ], + "27862267": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 294" + ], + "2786503": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 427", + "Section 294" + ], + "27870872": [ + "Section 324" + ], + "27931330": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 394" + ], + "27944536": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "279479": [ + "Section 494" + ], + "27948440": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 294" + ], + "279543": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 300" + ], + "27986905": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 498A" + ], + "28010403": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 120", + "Section 420", + "Section 13", + "Section 409" + ], + "28024270": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 452", + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 323" + ], + "28025990": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304", + "Section 107" + ], + "2810877": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120" + ], + "283902": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 452", + "Section 302" + ], + "28660678": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 201", + "Section 304" + ], + "28851473": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 313", + "Section 307", + "Section 161" + ], + "28073803": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 437" + ], + "28095593": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "282401": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "28248955": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 498", + "Section 406", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "282497": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302" + ], + "2864283": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 120B", + "Section 482", + "Section 34", + "Section 323" + ], + "28646": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "28651366": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 294", + "Section 186" + ], + "2865731": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 306", + "Section 438" + ], + "281882": [ + "Section 190" + ], + "281994": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 34" + ], + "282004": [ + "Section 395", + "Section 392", + "Section 342", + "Section 323", + "Section 164" + ], + "28564108": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 366" + ], + "28921426": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 406", + "Section 498A" + ], + "282181": [ + "Section 201" + ], + "28228446": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "2827957": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 324", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 341", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 342", + "Section 323" + ], + "28282952": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 336", + "Section 504", + "Section 147" + ], + "282886": [ + "Section 395" + ], + "28316498": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "28328771": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 300", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 325", + "Section 147" + ], + "28398113": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306" + ], + "284034": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 34", + "Section 300" + ], + "28415042": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 304", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 307", + "Section 300" + ], + "28521848": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 307", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 120B", + "Section 415", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "28540901": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 304", + "Section 300" + ], + "28546427": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 200", + "Section 34" + ], + "285475": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 313" + ], + "28549564": [ + "Section 173", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 427", + "Section 336", + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "28689111": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "2869440": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 294" + ], + "28698346": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 392", + "Section 427", + "Section 379", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 384" + ], + "28704258": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 375" + ], + "28709394": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "28720741": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 509", + "Section 323" + ], + "287243": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 304", + "Section 120B", + "Section 3" + ], + "28724477": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 34", + "Section 323" + ], + "28940988": [ + "Section 397" + ], + "28979194": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 498A" + ], + "289923": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 161", + "Section 304" + ], + "28998696": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 448", + "Section 34" + ], + "29000255": [ + "Section 120B" + ], + "29011739": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 395", + "Section 397", + "Section 457" + ], + "29014341": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 147", + "Section 341", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 427" + ], + "29015187": [ + "Section 364", + "Section 342", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 147" + ], + "287582": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 4", + "Section 5" + ], + "287972": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 375", + "Section 366" + ], + "28802074": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 294" + ], + "288570": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "288600": [ + "Section 201" + ], + "28867258": [ + "Section 336", + "Section 504", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "28880744": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "290765": [ + "Section 511", + "Section 120" + ], + "29082828": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 294" + ], + "29086804": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 324" + ], + "290901": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 186", + "Section 332" + ], + "29119221": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 201" + ], + "291195": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 409", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467" + ], + "29128752": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 173", + "Section 427", + "Section 447", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "29131737": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 506", + "Section 376" + ], + "29141781": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 294", + "Section 323" + ], + "29141788": [ + "Section 332", + "Section 147", + "Section 353" + ], + "29149806": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107" + ], + "291524": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 307" + ], + "29244602": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "29249962": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 336", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "2926599": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 376", + "Section 120B" + ], + "29857851": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 149" + ], + "29863552": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 366", + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "29401553": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "294120": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 452", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 504" + ], + "2941555": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 406", + "Section 320" + ], + "29420621": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 304" + ], + "29435977": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 395", + "Section 397", + "Section 201" + ], + "29603447": [ + "Section 173" + ], + "29606517": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 302" + ], + "29618630": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 120", + "Section 415", + "Section 447", + "Section 448", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 34" + ], + "29644710": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 376", + "Section 34", + "Section 120B", + "Section 201" + ], + "29069471": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 332", + "Section 353", + "Section 341" + ], + "293836": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "296612": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 34", + "Section 320", + "Section 323" + ], + "29752273": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 294", + "Section 34" + ], + "29703615": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 341", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 392" + ], + "29721878": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 294" + ], + "29738758": [ + "Section 304A" + ], + "29741811": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 326", + "Section 504", + "Section 323" + ], + "29776625": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 380", + "Section 436", + "Section 34", + "Section 308", + "Section 324", + "Section 509", + "Section 427", + "Section 448", + "Section 323", + "Section 354", + "Section 326" + ], + "29802167": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 308", + "Section 324" + ], + "29815752": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 294", + "Section 149" + ], + "29818738": [ + "Section 395", + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 392", + "Section 427", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 379", + "Section 302", + "Section 504", + "Section 452", + "Section 186", + "Section 506", + "Section 457", + "Section 201", + "Section 336", + "Section 380", + "Section 332" + ], + "2982083": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 506" + ], + "2982624": [ + "Section 498A" + ], + "29892613": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "29910966": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 511", + "Section 294" + ], + "299482": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 34" + ], + "299576": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 411" + ], + "299591": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 379", + "Section 420", + "Section 448", + "Section 173", + "Section 200" + ], + "29961788": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 120B" + ], + "30071647": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302" + ], + "300796": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "300835": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "300183": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 364", + "Section 149" + ], + "30114031": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 341", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 336", + "Section 324", + "Section 353", + "Section 302", + "Section 332", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 427", + "Section 397" + ], + "3012580": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 34" + ], + "301445": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "30240724": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 34", + "Section 323" + ], + "30253984": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 504", + "Section 304" + ], + "302567": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302" + ], + "30292066": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 397", + "Section 392", + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 457", + "Section 380" + ], + "30306": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 164", + "Section 161", + "Section 304", + "Section 34" + ], + "30200": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 302" + ], + "30222719": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 336", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "302333": [ + "Section 364", + "Section 201", + "Section 3", + "Section 120B" + ], + "30432625": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 504", + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "30464245": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 366", + "Section 506" + ], + "31001928": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 294" + ], + "31015023": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 336", + "Section 323", + "Section 294", + "Section 506" + ], + "310361": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "305964": [ + "Section 365", + "Section 34", + "Section 392" + ], + "30599901": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "30626043": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 448", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "30393023": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "30393169": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "30488222": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 394" + ], + "30489003": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "30505913": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "30506704": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 341", + "Section 504", + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "305097": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 13" + ], + "30532": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "30534286": [ + "Section 409" + ], + "30535053": [ + "Section 279", + "Section 337" + ], + "30535773": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "30545897": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 320", + "Section 341" + ], + "3055432": [ + "Section 173" + ], + "307132": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 392", + "Section 302" + ], + "307268": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 452", + "Section 325", + "Section 147", + "Section 143", + "Section 304", + "Section 307", + "Section 504", + "Section 324" + ], + "307303": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "30794249": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "30822518": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 306", + "Section 509" + ], + "30846321": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 120B", + "Section 201" + ], + "30861": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 376" + ], + "30972190": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 438", + "Section 323" + ], + "309722": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 406" + ], + "30982464": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 397", + "Section 392" + ], + "30986084": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 304" + ], + "315992": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "31698079": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 452", + "Section 3" + ], + "30914582": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 326", + "Section 325" + ], + "309354": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "30954695": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 341" + ], + "31039396": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 341", + "Section 427", + "Section 325" + ], + "310431": [ + "Section 120B" + ], + "31044092": [ + "Section 447", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 164", + "Section 438" + ], + "31070462": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 427", + "Section 397", + "Section 392" + ], + "31075555": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 498A", + "Section 438" + ], + "31087985": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 147", + "Section 294", + "Section 186", + "Section 332" + ], + "31140166": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 354", + "Section 325" + ], + "31143592": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 376", + "Section 366", + "Section 324" + ], + "31147480": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 302", + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 304" + ], + "3120364": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "312043": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 155", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 200", + "Section 420" + ], + "31231909": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 506" + ], + "31271170": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A", + "Section 302" + ], + "31294983": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294", + "Section 394" + ], + "3132241": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "31331895": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 506" + ], + "314317": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 299" + ], + "314470": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 427", + "Section 342", + "Section 173" + ], + "31375222": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 324" + ], + "313783": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 34" + ], + "31386982": [ + "Section 143", + "Section 147", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 302" + ], + "31391333": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 34", + "Section 420" + ], + "31395698": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 149", + "Section 148" + ], + "31496689": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 427", + "Section 332", + "Section 109", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 143", + "Section 147", + "Section 395", + "Section 420", + "Section 353" + ], + "31635051": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107", + "Section 34", + "Section 307" + ], + "316360": [ + "Section 149" + ], + "31677907": [ + "Section 389" + ], + "316906": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 392", + "Section 2", + "Section 395" + ], + "31691623": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A" + ], + "316933": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "3169506": [ + "Section 366A", + "Section 120B" + ], + "31815293": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "31836325": [ + "Section 4", + "Section 3" + ], + "31841169": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "31758454": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "31982283": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 34" + ], + "31995224": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 506" + ], + "32038154": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 148", + "Section 3", + "Section 147" + ], + "32059069": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 336", + "Section 149", + "Section 188", + "Section 411", + "Section 173" + ], + "32064509": [ + "Section 229A" + ], + "3201134": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 406", + "Section 506", + "Section 354", + "Section 420" + ], + "320189": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 5", + "Section 304", + "Section 34", + "Section 366", + "Section 313", + "Section 363", + "Section 161" + ], + "320201": [ + "Section 415", + "Section 420" + ], + "32022950": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 411" + ], + "31700409": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 427", + "Section 337", + "Section 147", + "Section 143" + ], + "31716362": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 149", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 307" + ], + "3172219": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 498A" + ], + "31722355": [ + "Section 494", + "Section 506" + ], + "32139815": [ + "Section 4", + "Section 3" + ], + "32144706": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 308", + "Section 447" + ], + "32147987": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 379" + ], + "321504": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 34", + "Section 300", + "Section 304", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 307" + ], + "32153900": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "32158233": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 427", + "Section 392", + "Section 506", + "Section 336", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 341" + ], + "321592": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 326", + "Section 149", + "Section 307" + ], + "32160826": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "321663": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 302", + "Section 376", + "Section 337", + "Section 307", + "Section 379", + "Section 34" + ], + "32091804": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 448", + "Section 427", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 324", + "Section 341", + "Section 147" + ], + "32095553": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 294" + ], + "32214359": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 34", + "Section 323" + ], + "32223733": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 306", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "32226160": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366A", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34" + ], + "32590222": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "325919": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "32599032": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 438", + "Section 448", + "Section 376" + ], + "322388": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294", + "Section 353", + "Section 186", + "Section 376", + "Section 155", + "Section 107", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 366" + ], + "32240768": [ + "Section 304A" + ], + "32317749": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 302" + ], + "32323497": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 300", + "Section 304" + ], + "323272": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 511" + ], + "323308": [ + "Section 365", + "Section 34", + "Section 363" + ], + "32520179": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 420" + ], + "325263": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 304" + ], + "32527739": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 506" + ], + "32562126": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 188", + "Section 332", + "Section 336", + "Section 147", + "Section 307", + "Section 353", + "Section 143" + ], + "325663": [ + "Section 395", + "Section 313", + "Section 353", + "Section 332" + ], + "32575109": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 323", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 324" + ], + "32606554": [ + "Section 409" + ], + "32613971": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 447", + "Section 353", + "Section 186" + ], + "32646641": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 34", + "Section 323" + ], + "326478": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "326670": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 120B", + "Section 379", + "Section 109", + "Section 201", + "Section 468", + "Section 447", + "Section 420" + ], + "326779": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "326813": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 325", + "Section 342" + ], + "32280": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 120B" + ], + "32639406": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 307" + ], + "3279146": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 186", + "Section 294" + ], + "32934216": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 324" + ], + "33014327": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 504", + "Section 306", + "Section 506" + ], + "3282804": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "32834940": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 506" + ], + "328358": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 324", + "Section 302", + "Section 323" + ], + "32868": [ + "Section 193" + ], + "328748": [ + "Section 397" + ], + "328826": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 161", + "Section 34" + ], + "32886392": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 34" + ], + "32888222": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 506", + "Section 320", + "Section 325" + ], + "33182891": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 324" + ], + "3318521": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 354", + "Section 438", + "Section 448", + "Section 323" + ], + "332034": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "3320393": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 419", + "Section 406" + ], + "332099": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 5" + ], + "33212572": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "33215193": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 304", + "Section 325", + "Section 300", + "Section 324", + "Section 326" + ], + "327671": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "32768349": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 448", + "Section 323", + "Section 498A" + ], + "33308": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 498A", + "Section 498" + ], + "3333603": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302" + ], + "333417": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 353" + ], + "3339002": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 109", + "Section 173" + ], + "33415505": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 427" + ], + "3342867": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 300", + "Section 326", + "Section 323", + "Section 143", + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "338325": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "33855981": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 438", + "Section 326" + ], + "33865428": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 395" + ], + "338680": [ + "Section 338" + ], + "335501": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 304" + ], + "335556": [ + "Section 498A" + ], + "33566103": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 447", + "Section 326" + ], + "3357388": [ + "Section 13" + ], + "33674304": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "336931": [ + "Section 164", + "Section 482", + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 161" + ], + "33694794": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 504", + "Section 452", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 156" + ], + "33696181": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A", + "Section 452" + ], + "33608011": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 325", + "Section 326" + ], + "336336": [ + "Section 415" + ], + "336403": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 384" + ], + "33646448": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "336570": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 325" + ], + "33658780": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B" + ], + "3372231": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 307", + "Section 365", + "Section 506", + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 148" + ], + "33727087": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107" + ], + "33735019": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 3" + ], + "33737800": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 411" + ], + "33738452": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 299" + ], + "33739482": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 324", + "Section 320", + "Section 307" + ], + "337396": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 482", + "Section 109", + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 120B" + ], + "33794860": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 438", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "33795633": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "33801697": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 120B", + "Section 366A", + "Section 366" + ], + "33801785": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 306", + "Section 304B", + "Section 323", + "Section 304" + ], + "33802469": [ + "Section 155", + "Section 307", + "Section 156" + ], + "33809513": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 120", + "Section 307", + "Section 143", + "Section 147" + ], + "338103": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 149", + "Section 302" + ], + "33813433": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 365", + "Section 120B", + "Section 438" + ], + "34362046": [ + "Section 173", + "Section 34", + "Section 156" + ], + "34475874": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 438" + ], + "346187": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 34" + ], + "34681598": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 320", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 342" + ], + "34812926": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "349239": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 228", + "Section 193", + "Section 420", + "Section 511" + ], + "34287330": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "342903": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 109", + "Section 120B", + "Section 411" + ], + "34312209": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304B", + "Section 304" + ], + "33923758": [ + "Section 308", + "Section 452", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 342", + "Section 427", + "Section 341" + ], + "3393404": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 448", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "33973424": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A" + ], + "33974567": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 279" + ], + "33976542": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "33999": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 120B" + ], + "34003186": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 468" + ], + "34005593": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "341409": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 342", + "Section 448" + ], + "340501": [ + "Section 188" + ], + "34063": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 326" + ], + "34067199": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 13" + ], + "34103857": [ + "Section 149" + ], + "34117295": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "341711": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "341734": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 320", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "34175613": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 471" + ], + "34188194": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 3", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "342050": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "34365738": [ + "Section 114", + "Section 332" + ], + "3440": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 114", + "Section 302", + "Section 161" + ], + "34414731": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 326", + "Section 307", + "Section 504", + "Section 324", + "Section 323" + ], + "34490793": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 342" + ], + "344937": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 323", + "Section 313", + "Section 300" + ], + "35056872": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 468" + ], + "34968955": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 190", + "Section 200", + "Section 156" + ], + "349773": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 34", + "Section 5", + "Section 467", + "Section 302", + "Section 471" + ], + "34892452": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 320", + "Section 325", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 143", + "Section 147", + "Section 482", + "Section 3", + "Section 324" + ], + "34899999": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 307", + "Section 107" + ], + "34905": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 304", + "Section 300" + ], + "349137": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 336", + "Section 332", + "Section 148", + "Section 436", + "Section 307" + ], + "34929014": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 341", + "Section 308", + "Section 332", + "Section 148" + ], + "34933699": [ + "Section 114", + "Section 279" + ], + "34952134": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A" + ], + "35172499": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 34", + "Section 323" + ], + "35181668": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "35199562": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406" + ], + "3540906": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "352111": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 323" + ], + "35211226": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 294" + ], + "35255397": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 34", + "Section 498" + ], + "35284849": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "353338": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "35337439": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 342", + "Section 376" + ], + "35337689": [ + "Section 228" + ], + "35348793": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 155", + "Section 482", + "Section 156", + "Section 173" + ], + "3536064": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 306", + "Section 201", + "Section 120B", + "Section 313", + "Section 164", + "Section 364", + "Section 300" + ], + "35492371": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 324" + ], + "35422019": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 294", + "Section 394" + ], + "35465693": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 376", + "Section 397", + "Section 307", + "Section 394" + ], + "3547305": [ + "Section 229A" + ], + "35539164": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 465", + "Section 467" + ], + "35549067": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 325", + "Section 148", + "Section 149" + ], + "355495": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "357049": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B" + ], + "35730860": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 304B" + ], + "35732909": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 120", + "Section 34" + ], + "36245357": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "36422810": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 147", + "Section 143", + "Section 148" + ], + "36429614": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 34", + "Section 149", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 364", + "Section 120B", + "Section 506", + "Section 341", + "Section 302", + "Section 342", + "Section 307", + "Section 448", + "Section 427", + "Section 452", + "Section 447", + "Section 394", + "Section 174A" + ], + "36388906": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 3" + ], + "36394165": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 294" + ], + "36402205": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "36409507": [ + "Section 337", + "Section 304A", + "Section 279" + ], + "35991157": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107", + "Section 228", + "Section 482", + "Section 109", + "Section 307", + "Section 397", + "Section 173", + "Section 313" + ], + "36003": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 427", + "Section 447", + "Section 376", + "Section 149", + "Section 506", + "Section 379", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 354", + "Section 511" + ], + "36016670": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 363", + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34" + ], + "36035132": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 300", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 148", + "Section 304", + "Section 323", + "Section 147" + ], + "36079228": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506" + ], + "360805": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 304" + ], + "36094783": [ + "Section 120B" + ], + "361176": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 120B", + "Section 419" + ], + "361177": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "362252": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "36237": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "36999804": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "37012017": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 120B", + "Section 363", + "Section 366A" + ], + "372919": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "372939": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 164" + ], + "373102": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A" + ], + "3731380": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 427", + "Section 294", + "Section 147", + "Section 143" + ], + "36153599": [ + "Section 332", + "Section 186", + "Section 353", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 342", + "Section 308" + ], + "361672": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 109" + ], + "36179680": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294" + ], + "36182358": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 336", + "Section 427", + "Section 147" + ], + "3619342": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "3619406": [ + "Section 364", + "Section 120" + ], + "36490022": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 397", + "Section 325", + "Section 114", + "Section 302" + ], + "36533793": [ + "Section 447", + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "36534425": [ + "Section 120", + "Section 155", + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 482", + "Section 34", + "Section 173", + "Section 471", + "Section 156" + ], + "36570166": [ + "Section 409" + ], + "366446": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 300", + "Section 304" + ], + "366613": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 34", + "Section 411", + "Section 107", + "Section 420", + "Section 149", + "Section 379", + "Section 148" + ], + "3667467": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 336", + "Section 34" + ], + "36675692": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 326", + "Section 323", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "36678691": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 320" + ], + "36680838": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 375" + ], + "3676000": [ + "Section 143", + "Section 188" + ], + "36760973": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 326", + "Section 307" + ], + "36782173": [ + "Section 417", + "Section 406", + "Section 506", + "Section 376" + ], + "36803123": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 437" + ], + "36820292": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 506", + "Section 498A" + ], + "36822909": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 304", + "Section 325", + "Section 504", + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 506" + ], + "36829931": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 342", + "Section 392" + ], + "37172889": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 438", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "36912490": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 323", + "Section 506" + ], + "37329088": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 143", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 323" + ], + "37427564": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 193", + "Section 397", + "Section 147", + "Section 188", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 200", + "Section 148", + "Section 324", + "Section 326", + "Section 471" + ], + "375277": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 427", + "Section 406", + "Section 323", + "Section 420" + ], + "3766277": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 324", + "Section 308", + "Section 323" + ], + "37886707": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "36936597": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 338", + "Section 337", + "Section 279" + ], + "36942": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "369595": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 452" + ], + "36979880": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 336", + "Section 148", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 294", + "Section 147", + "Section 302" + ], + "362611": [ + "Section 120B" + ], + "36275299": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 506" + ], + "36293": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 299", + "Section 325" + ], + "36303934": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 353", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 294" + ], + "36309959": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 379", + "Section 504", + "Section 173", + "Section 448", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 325" + ], + "363122": [ + "Section 279", + "Section 337" + ], + "37109735": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 506" + ], + "371215": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 307" + ], + "37333376": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 341", + "Section 302" + ], + "3736171": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "37380441": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 363", + "Section 120B", + "Section 201", + "Section 364" + ], + "371893": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 471", + "Section 397", + "Section 467" + ], + "37202650": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "37231562": [ + "Section 332", + "Section 504", + "Section 427", + "Section 188", + "Section 307", + "Section 353", + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "37254": [ + "Section 498A" + ], + "37272530": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 325" + ], + "37285750": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 304", + "Section 320", + "Section 325", + "Section 147" + ], + "37414017": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 448", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 427" + ], + "37414643": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 468" + ], + "37575856": [ + "Section 173", + "Section 190", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 342", + "Section 149", + "Section 304", + "Section 395", + "Section 307", + "Section 200", + "Section 193", + "Section 324", + "Section 308", + "Section 397" + ], + "37577525": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "37581539": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 366" + ], + "375876": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 34" + ], + "37506206": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 420", + "Section 504", + "Section 409" + ], + "37507139": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 365", + "Section 364" + ], + "375085": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "3751166": [ + "Section 452" + ], + "37608": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 302", + "Section 394", + "Section 397" + ], + "376117": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 504" + ], + "37627792": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 304" + ], + "376343": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "37638708": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 342", + "Section 307" + ], + "37648443": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420" + ], + "379498": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 326", + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 148" + ], + "37712496": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 34" + ], + "37559376": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 376", + "Section 201" + ], + "377362": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 313" + ], + "37742966": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "37751527": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "37756918": [ + "Section 143", + "Section 120B", + "Section 427", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 188", + "Section 2", + "Section 3" + ], + "37760536": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A" + ], + "37765133": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 366", + "Section 384", + "Section 364" + ], + "37975412": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "37980841": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B" + ], + "37771456": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 34", + "Section 438" + ], + "37776706": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 438", + "Section 325", + "Section 326" + ], + "383049": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "38305": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 326", + "Section 307" + ], + "383298": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 457" + ], + "38330308": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 313", + "Section 326", + "Section 307", + "Section 417", + "Section 506", + "Section 320" + ], + "38012957": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 384", + "Section 365", + "Section 323", + "Section 120B", + "Section 376" + ], + "38016": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "38033376": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304" + ], + "380340": [ + "Section 389", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 452", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 326", + "Section 149", + "Section 323", + "Section 147" + ], + "38068292": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 353" + ], + "38080986": [ + "Section 338", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 332", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 186" + ], + "3845755": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 353", + "Section 324", + "Section 427", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "38560525": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 307", + "Section 320", + "Section 34", + "Section 406", + "Section 498A" + ], + "38817133": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 498A" + ], + "38149126": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 420" + ], + "38187778": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 34" + ], + "38210623": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "38237863": [ + "Section 436", + "Section 506", + "Section 302" + ], + "3824": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 300" + ], + "38520598": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "38553287": [ + "Section 173" + ], + "38441938": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 511", + "Section 229A", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 376", + "Section 174A" + ], + "384457": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "3847612": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 326", + "Section 427", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 324", + "Section 504", + "Section 143", + "Section 147" + ], + "38593516": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 323", + "Section 394" + ], + "38603": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 366" + ], + "38618254": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "391585": [ + "Section 308", + "Section 482", + "Section 379", + "Section 323", + "Section 504" + ], + "39174052": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 420", + "Section 34" + ], + "38817427": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 409", + "Section 120B", + "Section 406", + "Section 13" + ], + "38819139": [ + "Section 143", + "Section 341", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 325" + ], + "388249": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "388259": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 354", + "Section 366" + ], + "388277": [ + "Section 120B" + ], + "38922073": [ + "Section 375" + ], + "38938192": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 325", + "Section 34" + ], + "38953010": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 354", + "Section 323" + ], + "38956186": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 506" + ], + "39008403": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 438" + ], + "39022412": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 354", + "Section 320" + ], + "39026709": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 498", + "Section 307", + "Section 147", + "Section 324", + "Section 364" + ], + "39028404": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420" + ], + "39029873": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 471" + ], + "39035045": [ + "Section 173" + ], + "39042": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 173", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 482", + "Section 13" + ], + "390507": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 34" + ], + "39051096": [ + "Section 447", + "Section 3" + ], + "39052364": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 173" + ], + "391360": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 420", + "Section 34", + "Section 201" + ], + "447378": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 409", + "Section 420", + "Section 109", + "Section 34" + ], + "463856": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 498", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "467223": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 308", + "Section 120B", + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "39249507": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 279", + "Section 338" + ], + "39327718": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 313", + "Section 323", + "Section 148", + "Section 302" + ], + "39338957": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 438", + "Section 294", + "Section 186" + ], + "393489": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 406", + "Section 482", + "Section 409", + "Section 498A" + ], + "39351": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 447", + "Section 149", + "Section 34", + "Section 427" + ], + "39367239": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 307", + "Section 397", + "Section 302" + ], + "39367644": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "39382343": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 336", + "Section 506" + ], + "39415256": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 498A", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 120", + "Section 384" + ], + "39417080": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 397", + "Section 307", + "Section 201", + "Section 394", + "Section 366", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 300", + "Section 363", + "Section 450", + "Section 120B", + "Section 452", + "Section 365" + ], + "39420296": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 506" + ], + "39421505": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 120B", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 506", + "Section 468" + ], + "39423187": [ + "Section 494", + "Section 420", + "Section 415", + "Section 498", + "Section 109", + "Section 500", + "Section 376" + ], + "39428874": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 379", + "Section 307", + "Section 448", + "Section 325", + "Section 436", + "Section 34", + "Section 438" + ], + "39452605": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 498A" + ], + "39461": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 506", + "Section 341", + "Section 342", + "Section 353" + ], + "39570904": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 323" + ], + "39514808": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 506", + "Section 201" + ], + "395248": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 109" + ], + "395346": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 300", + "Section 304", + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "395978": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 323" + ], + "39604131": [ + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "39605057": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 323", + "Section 354", + "Section 324", + "Section 506" + ], + "39784555": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "39797343": [ + "Section 304B" + ], + "39801": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 504", + "Section 448", + "Section 147", + "Section 323" + ], + "398135": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 337", + "Section 427", + "Section 336", + "Section 148" + ], + "398290": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 509", + "Section 500", + "Section 200" + ], + "398731": [ + "Section 500", + "Section 34" + ], + "3989820": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 468" + ], + "39959704": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "39961942": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 420" + ], + "39964487": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 364", + "Section 342", + "Section 148", + "Section 506" + ], + "39971562": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 120B" + ], + "40022871": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 107" + ], + "40039480": [ + "Section 332", + "Section 34", + "Section 186" + ], + "40050173": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "40111782": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 452", + "Section 320" + ], + "401150": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 326", + "Section 304", + "Section 325", + "Section 323" + ], + "40129542": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 341", + "Section 447", + "Section 34", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 354" + ], + "40419287": [ + "Section 149" + ], + "404489": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 341", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 143" + ], + "40458404": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 279", + "Section 337" + ], + "40468140": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 506", + "Section 294" + ], + "404818": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 120" + ], + "40604231": [ + "Section 452" + ], + "40637893": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 420", + "Section 482", + "Section 313", + "Section 323" + ], + "406413": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "40552908": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107", + "Section 34" + ], + "40577383": [ + "Section 375" + ], + "4057789": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107" + ], + "40344": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 324" + ], + "40646691": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "40883699": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B" + ], + "40711792": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 279" + ], + "407379": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 482", + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 452", + "Section 500", + "Section 389", + "Section 323" + ], + "40796547": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "40821995": [ + "Section 299", + "Section 326" + ], + "40824585": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "40831706": [ + "Section 436", + "Section 500", + "Section 294" + ], + "40842451": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 498", + "Section 307", + "Section 498A" + ], + "4084421": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "409332": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 364", + "Section 120B", + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "4093659": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 34", + "Section 448", + "Section 509", + "Section 506", + "Section 438", + "Section 498A", + "Section 354" + ], + "409373": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 379", + "Section 363" + ], + "409402": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "40950489": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 438" + ], + "408848": [ + "Section 120B" + ], + "408862": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 313", + "Section 302" + ], + "40894624": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498" + ], + "4089633": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 498A", + "Section 320" + ], + "40896722": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 306", + "Section 323" + ], + "40899012": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "409057": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 504", + "Section 420", + "Section 323", + "Section 341" + ], + "40910": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 34", + "Section 468", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467" + ], + "41172937": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 341", + "Section 465" + ], + "41186849": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 313", + "Section 448", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "41190419": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 279" + ], + "41192601": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 149" + ], + "41202155": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 452", + "Section 504" + ], + "41457796": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 3", + "Section 307" + ], + "414784": [ + "Section 419", + "Section 467" + ], + "414865": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "4141416": [ + "Section 415" + ], + "41420472": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 363", + "Section 2" + ], + "41437175": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "4143808": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 498" + ], + "415038": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 149" + ], + "415055": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 394" + ], + "415170": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 120" + ], + "416614": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 465", + "Section 409", + "Section 511", + "Section 201" + ], + "41664122": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 354", + "Section 498", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "41616264": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "416220": [ + "Section 498A" + ], + "41626002": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 341", + "Section 452", + "Section 325" + ], + "41628933": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 34" + ], + "41645859": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420" + ], + "40961689": [ + "Section 2", + "Section 323" + ], + "40971259": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420" + ], + "40973888": [ + "Section 511", + "Section 506", + "Section 498A" + ], + "40977065": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 323", + "Section 354" + ], + "418105": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "41821000": [ + "Section 409" + ], + "41821385": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 482", + "Section 107", + "Section 506", + "Section 155", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 294", + "Section 156" + ], + "41831213": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 307" + ], + "418344": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 304", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "41703887": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 448", + "Section 323", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 294", + "Section 354", + "Section 353", + "Section 498", + "Section 332" + ], + "41719693": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "41782982": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 186" + ], + "418000": [ + "Section 5" + ], + "4180187": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 397", + "Section 395" + ], + "41803952": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B" + ], + "41906606": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 294", + "Section 341", + "Section 504" + ], + "41923012": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "419311": [ + "Section 200", + "Section 482" + ], + "418683": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 364", + "Section 120" + ], + "41870488": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 409" + ], + "41875927": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 304", + "Section 34", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 302" + ], + "41882205": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 376" + ], + "41887571": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 188" + ], + "418905": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 506", + "Section 186" + ], + "41892941": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 148", + "Section 326", + "Section 325", + "Section 324", + "Section 149" + ], + "41948": [ + "Section 494", + "Section 34" + ], + "41948331": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 326" + ], + "41951922": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 366", + "Section 363" + ], + "41957714": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 326" + ], + "41980686": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 325", + "Section 302", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 149" + ], + "419971": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 353", + "Section 228", + "Section 500", + "Section 467", + "Section 465", + "Section 186", + "Section 332" + ], + "42010378": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 379", + "Section 326" + ], + "42094": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 149" + ], + "421059": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 2" + ], + "421093": [ + "Section 304A" + ], + "42116285": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "42177792": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "42184625": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 494", + "Section 376" + ], + "42255476": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 326" + ], + "42268428": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 13", + "Section 409" + ], + "422770": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "42390558": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 186" + ], + "424084": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 120B", + "Section 201", + "Section 34", + "Section 200" + ], + "42735305": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "42443303": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 511", + "Section 376" + ], + "424525": [ + "Section 109" + ], + "42456713": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 13", + "Section 420" + ], + "424605": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 506" + ], + "425078": [ + "Section 332", + "Section 294" + ], + "425104": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302" + ], + "4251288": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 307", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 300" + ], + "42515439": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "425375": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 326", + "Section 342", + "Section 307" + ], + "4253897": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 341" + ], + "425408": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 304B", + "Section 34" + ], + "42285749": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 406", + "Section 498A" + ], + "42288413": [ + "Section 149" + ], + "42295890": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "423074": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 427", + "Section 323", + "Section 147" + ], + "42650836": [ + "Section 313", + "Section 302" + ], + "42676153": [ + "Section 419", + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 471", + "Section 468" + ], + "42680403": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 506" + ], + "42681778": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 304", + "Section 302" + ], + "42696823": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 354", + "Section 509", + "Section 341", + "Section 147", + "Section 380", + "Section 448" + ], + "4269865": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 149" + ], + "42604370": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 376", + "Section 354" + ], + "42641402": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 438", + "Section 506" + ], + "4264209": [ + "Section 366A", + "Section 363", + "Section 109", + "Section 120B", + "Section 376", + "Section 366" + ], + "42648659": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 506", + "Section 120B", + "Section 384", + "Section 109", + "Section 307" + ], + "42794588": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "4279594": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 389" + ], + "42811525": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 504", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 149" + ], + "42739677": [ + "Section 313", + "Section 376", + "Section 511" + ], + "42770158": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 120B", + "Section 471", + "Section 228", + "Section 468", + "Section 313", + "Section 156" + ], + "42776458": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 143" + ], + "42965802": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 406", + "Section 482", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "429750": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 325", + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "42988846": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 506", + "Section 366", + "Section 120B" + ], + "430064": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "43055807": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "432207": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 332", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 448", + "Section 342", + "Section 324", + "Section 379" + ], + "43248153": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "4325": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300" + ], + "43254502": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 365", + "Section 411", + "Section 120B", + "Section 395" + ], + "432679": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 342", + "Section 354", + "Section 323", + "Section 164", + "Section 304" + ], + "43519400": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "43520450": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 494", + "Section 114", + "Section 109" + ], + "43611121": [ + "Section 173" + ], + "43615995": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 379" + ], + "43616943": [ + "Section 389" + ], + "436194": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 457", + "Section 380", + "Section 302" + ], + "43689201": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 307", + "Section 498A" + ], + "43698": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 504", + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 506", + "Section 482", + "Section 173", + "Section 302" + ], + "43711439": [ + "Section 143", + "Section 353", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 186" + ], + "43712": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 313", + "Section 395" + ], + "43715219": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 506", + "Section 354" + ], + "4375960": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 337", + "Section 306", + "Section 323", + "Section 324" + ], + "43766984": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 326", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 341" + ], + "43775300": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "4377645": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 448" + ], + "439399": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "43864218": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "438996": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 419", + "Section 415" + ], + "43900913": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 342", + "Section 366" + ], + "43910432": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 438", + "Section 448", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "43913034": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 147", + "Section 148" + ], + "45294723": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 323" + ], + "45299": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 324" + ], + "45306570": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "45326564": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 366A", + "Section 375" + ], + "453305": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 325", + "Section 148" + ], + "45330955": [ + "Section 395", + "Section 394" + ], + "453488": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 304B" + ], + "45374873": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 465", + "Section 471" + ], + "45375311": [ + "Section 417", + "Section 506", + "Section 376" + ], + "453756": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "45378003": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "4538189": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 341", + "Section 34" + ], + "453820": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "45384144": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 498" + ], + "45388478": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 397", + "Section 392" + ], + "454001": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 325", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 148" + ], + "454044": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 149", + "Section 323", + "Section 148" + ], + "45412198": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "45416735": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306" + ], + "45965550": [ + "Section 229A" + ], + "45975119": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 341" + ], + "45991977": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 341" + ], + "45996595": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 419", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467", + "Section 511" + ], + "441874": [ + "Section 409" + ], + "44201485": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "442664": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 376", + "Section 363" + ], + "44302094": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 342", + "Section 506" + ], + "44314167": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 427" + ], + "45441": [ + "Section 395", + "Section 397" + ], + "45453934": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 420", + "Section 452" + ], + "45683201": [ + "Section 384", + "Section 34" + ], + "45696131": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 3" + ], + "443722": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 452" + ], + "44381675": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 427", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 379", + "Section 173" + ], + "44395845": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 307", + "Section 448", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "444132": [ + "Section 465", + "Section 420", + "Section 302" + ], + "444227": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302" + ], + "44473477": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 457", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 379", + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 504", + "Section 307" + ], + "44475636": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 302", + "Section 300" + ], + "444762": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "44477335": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 379", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 341" + ], + "444792": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 341" + ], + "444871": [ + "Section 337" + ], + "44653229": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "446535": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 304", + "Section 34" + ], + "44662750": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 326" + ], + "44938951": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107" + ], + "45213800": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 188", + "Section 149" + ], + "445709": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "44579418": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "44585269": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 354" + ], + "44585913": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 482", + "Section 34", + "Section 155", + "Section 120B", + "Section 156", + "Section 420" + ], + "4399989": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 394", + "Section 450", + "Section 457", + "Section 380" + ], + "44878890": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "44889950": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "446021": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 307" + ], + "446069": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 326", + "Section 147", + "Section 3", + "Section 148", + "Section 307" + ], + "44619815": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 448", + "Section 506", + "Section 379", + "Section 34", + "Section 325" + ], + "44632141": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 34", + "Section 306" + ], + "44779485": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "4480475": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 294", + "Section 34", + "Section 320" + ], + "44809613": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A", + "Section 392" + ], + "44909948": [ + "Section 375" + ], + "44924346": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 504", + "Section 364", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "45158246": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 34" + ], + "45197910": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 190", + "Section 307" + ], + "452030": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 120B", + "Section 120" + ], + "45208316": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 437" + ], + "452222": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "45225745": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 161", + "Section 313" + ], + "4522849": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 376" + ], + "4524140": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 302", + "Section 384" + ], + "45244255": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "452448": [ + "Section 300" + ], + "45245395": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "45470995": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 34" + ], + "45490786": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 34", + "Section 447", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 354" + ], + "455188": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 120B" + ], + "45523867": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506" + ], + "45545433": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 148" + ], + "4554872": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304", + "Section 498", + "Section 34" + ], + "45717762": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 506", + "Section 164", + "Section 438" + ], + "45781384": [ + "Section 201" + ], + "459448": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302" + ], + "45964131": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 379", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 438" + ], + "45965148": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 427" + ], + "459138": [ + "Section 364", + "Section 173", + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "459178": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 313" + ], + "45889291": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 326", + "Section 148", + "Section 304", + "Section 147", + "Section 34" + ], + "45892200": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "45896076": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 306" + ], + "45899066": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 467" + ], + "46073050": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 457", + "Section 380" + ], + "46076147": [ + "Section 300" + ], + "46112": [ + "Section 279", + "Section 304A" + ], + "46118579": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 506" + ], + "46126905": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 406", + "Section 320", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "4612696": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 452", + "Section 379", + "Section 380" + ], + "461776": [ + "Section 173", + "Section 2", + "Section 156", + "Section 161" + ], + "46181570": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 379", + "Section 420" + ], + "46181580": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "461905": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 323" + ], + "4619193": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "46382736": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107" + ], + "46485945": [ + "Section 436", + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "46497959": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 323", + "Section 397", + "Section 325", + "Section 324", + "Section 395" + ], + "4650240": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 465", + "Section 471", + "Section 447", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467" + ], + "46622941": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "46625340": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "46627": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 354" + ], + "46633768": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 337", + "Section 279", + "Section 482" + ], + "46634": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 34", + "Section 324" + ], + "46555180": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 120B" + ], + "46560286": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 164", + "Section 120B" + ], + "46587735": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 450", + "Section 302", + "Section 511" + ], + "46604392": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 354" + ], + "466557": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "46671147": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 506", + "Section 406", + "Section 34" + ], + "46708473": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 149", + "Section 308", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 452", + "Section 299", + "Section 325", + "Section 34" + ], + "46709604": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 302", + "Section 394" + ], + "467179": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 482" + ], + "46758452": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "46790887": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 324", + "Section 3" + ], + "46793657": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 380", + "Section 506", + "Section 320" + ], + "46808411": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 34" + ], + "470823": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 13" + ], + "470845": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "47118494": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 307", + "Section 363" + ], + "47172852": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 427", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 299", + "Section 114", + "Section 3" + ], + "47191331": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "468996": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 34", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 201", + "Section 341", + "Section 324" + ], + "4690697": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "469138": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 498A", + "Section 320", + "Section 406", + "Section 397", + "Section 323", + "Section 326", + "Section 307" + ], + "469141": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 364", + "Section 342", + "Section 366", + "Section 506", + "Section 353", + "Section 363", + "Section 504" + ], + "469210": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 420" + ], + "46933674": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 313", + "Section 148", + "Section 342", + "Section 147", + "Section 326", + "Section 323", + "Section 307", + "Section 447", + "Section 324" + ], + "469514": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 376" + ], + "46967684": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 341" + ], + "469677": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 436", + "Section 342", + "Section 427", + "Section 34" + ], + "47011612": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 336", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "470170": [ + "Section 500", + "Section 406", + "Section 506", + "Section 409", + "Section 420" + ], + "47044792": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 437", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "47075510": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 294" + ], + "471721": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 324" + ], + "47280677": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 436" + ], + "47280694": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 34", + "Section 120B" + ], + "472858": [ + "Section 304A" + ], + "47286263": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "472950": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 342", + "Section 107" + ], + "47299029": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 294" + ], + "473374": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 452", + "Section 148", + "Section 323" + ], + "47358268": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 436" + ], + "473610": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "47368860": [ + "Section 397" + ], + "47477732": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 363" + ], + "474435": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 34", + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 300" + ], + "47444621": [ + "Section 397" + ], + "47446216": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "474568": [ + "Section 190", + "Section 173", + "Section 156", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 200", + "Section 468" + ], + "47379535": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 304B", + "Section 107" + ], + "47489698": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 506", + "Section 341", + "Section 392", + "Section 148", + "Section 457", + "Section 147" + ], + "47814913": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 353" + ], + "4783250": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 438" + ], + "47833534": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 406", + "Section 498A" + ], + "4787542": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 511", + "Section 376", + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 147" + ], + "47960736": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 294", + "Section 34", + "Section 506" + ], + "479696": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "479761": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 320", + "Section 34", + "Section 307" + ], + "479317": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 34" + ], + "47957923": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 354" + ], + "48563589": [ + "Section 164", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 323", + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 504" + ], + "485860": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 313", + "Section 342", + "Section 379", + "Section 34" + ], + "480219": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 342", + "Section 420", + "Section 380" + ], + "480389": [ + "Section 279", + "Section 304", + "Section 337", + "Section 338" + ], + "48001124": [ + "Section 186", + "Section 320", + "Section 188" + ], + "48001201": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 326" + ], + "4800959": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "48296370": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 409", + "Section 411", + "Section 120B", + "Section 395", + "Section 109", + "Section 120" + ], + "48303": [ + "Section 419", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 427", + "Section 323", + "Section 326", + "Section 302", + "Section 436", + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "483060": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 109" + ], + "48317205": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "48602638": [ + "Section 465", + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 471" + ], + "486369": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 323" + ], + "48807740": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "48811016": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "48999": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 506", + "Section 304", + "Section 323" + ], + "49005206": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 326", + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 379", + "Section 308", + "Section 438" + ], + "49008828": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294", + "Section 336" + ], + "48667191": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "48667757": [ + "Section 313", + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 342", + "Section 3" + ], + "48669968": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 120B", + "Section 201", + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 120" + ], + "486717": [ + "Section 389", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "48695099": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 279", + "Section 304A" + ], + "48698866": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 324", + "Section 448", + "Section 452", + "Section 148", + "Section 326", + "Section 147" + ], + "48757794": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 504", + "Section 201" + ], + "4876019": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 366A", + "Section 376", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "48765747": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467" + ], + "487801": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 420" + ], + "48847809": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 173" + ], + "48862038": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "488831": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 306", + "Section 304" + ], + "48887222": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 376" + ], + "49133735": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 302" + ], + "49134393": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 34", + "Section 147", + "Section 452" + ], + "49139625": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "491438": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "49162710": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 323" + ], + "492841": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 379", + "Section 457" + ], + "49289864": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 186" + ], + "49290251": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B" + ], + "49424345": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 341" + ], + "49973731": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 353", + "Section 420", + "Section 448", + "Section 500" + ], + "331401": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 228" + ], + "41335993": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "46136395": [ + "Section 186", + "Section 353", + "Section 107" + ], + "469763": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 313", + "Section 304", + "Section 324" + ], + "49234731": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 13", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 409", + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A" + ], + "49496346": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 506" + ], + "49519448": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306" + ], + "49526488": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 326", + "Section 149", + "Section 325", + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 307" + ], + "4953310": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "49534840": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 465", + "Section 420" + ], + "49553357": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 452" + ], + "49612845": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 365", + "Section 364", + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "49621308": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 392" + ], + "497819": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 326", + "Section 299", + "Section 325", + "Section 300", + "Section 324", + "Section 341", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 304" + ], + "49695242": [ + "Section 336", + "Section 427", + "Section 294" + ], + "49712530": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "49719296": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 304B", + "Section 302", + "Section 498A" + ], + "489511": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "48974936": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 437" + ], + "462572": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 302", + "Section 498A" + ], + "46260294": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 147", + "Section 354", + "Section 506", + "Section 420", + "Section 452", + "Section 324" + ], + "46271110": [ + "Section 4", + "Section 5", + "Section 313", + "Section 3", + "Section 376" + ], + "46390760": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 143", + "Section 506", + "Section 448", + "Section 324" + ], + "46393911": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 324" + ], + "46394922": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 366A", + "Section 363" + ], + "46402833": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 149", + "Section 201" + ], + "46410": [ + "Section 228" + ], + "51297718": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 294" + ], + "513030": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 394" + ], + "51325969": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 447", + "Section 509", + "Section 188", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 354" + ], + "51326152": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 302" + ], + "501271": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 395", + "Section 397" + ], + "50135767": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 415", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 323", + "Section 468" + ], + "501378": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 457" + ], + "50155204": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "50155358": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 498A" + ], + "50165091": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "50167236": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 149", + "Section 120B", + "Section 148", + "Section 4", + "Section 143" + ], + "498509": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "49866069": [ + "Section 498A" + ], + "498238": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 307", + "Section 504", + "Section 498A", + "Section 323" + ], + "49954601": [ + "Section 279", + "Section 304", + "Section 338" + ], + "50003440": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107" + ], + "500040": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 306", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "50018614": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 147", + "Section 354", + "Section 149" + ], + "50032118": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 353", + "Section 34", + "Section 186" + ], + "5005677": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "500594": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 186", + "Section 188" + ], + "500779": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 304" + ], + "50080565": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 438", + "Section 326" + ], + "500892": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 193" + ], + "50275861": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 307", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 427", + "Section 147" + ], + "50291140": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 109", + "Section 506", + "Section 376" + ], + "50295851": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 34", + "Section 467", + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 468" + ], + "50232031": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 342", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 308", + "Section 34", + "Section 313" + ], + "502446": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "50268593": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 338", + "Section 304A", + "Section 300", + "Section 279", + "Section 299", + "Section 228", + "Section 337", + "Section 302" + ], + "50515111": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 304", + "Section 354", + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "50521436": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 306", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B" + ], + "505231": [ + "Section 494" + ], + "50539497": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 323" + ], + "504564": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 107" + ], + "50460433": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 294" + ], + "505047": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 482", + "Section 155", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 156" + ], + "50724935": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 326", + "Section 324", + "Section 143", + "Section 109", + "Section 452", + "Section 120B", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 397", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 302" + ], + "507644": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 302" + ], + "50898728": [ + "Section 494" + ], + "51003": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 394" + ], + "511635": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 415", + "Section 34", + "Section 482", + "Section 406" + ], + "51204032": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 392", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 336", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 341" + ], + "50470062": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 294" + ], + "504893": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "504950": [ + "Section 193" + ], + "504992": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302" + ], + "50500400": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "50502373": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 427", + "Section 447", + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "5057313": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "50596168": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 120B", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "50904410": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 34", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 326" + ], + "50913195": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 419", + "Section 406" + ], + "50917097": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "509298": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 506", + "Section 394", + "Section 395", + "Section 392" + ], + "509875": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 325", + "Section 147" + ], + "510098": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "51015511": [ + "Section 500", + "Section 120", + "Section 34", + "Section 193", + "Section 482" + ], + "51032904": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 420", + "Section 438", + "Section 164" + ], + "5117730": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 506", + "Section 467", + "Section 34", + "Section 156", + "Section 468", + "Section 465", + "Section 471" + ], + "51180832": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 313", + "Section 306" + ], + "51185433": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 392" + ], + "5119266": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 34", + "Section 467", + "Section 506", + "Section 468" + ], + "50318420": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 363", + "Section 323", + "Section 494", + "Section 366", + "Section 406", + "Section 498A", + "Section 506" + ], + "50321844": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 397", + "Section 392", + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "50339835": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 326", + "Section 504", + "Section 307" + ], + "5034809": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 307" + ], + "51090059": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 341", + "Section 363" + ], + "51094492": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 395", + "Section 394" + ], + "51102516": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 332", + "Section 34" + ], + "51120599": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 341", + "Section 147" + ], + "51137672": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 465" + ], + "51140405": [ + "Section 13" + ], + "51207745": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "51210453": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 143" + ], + "5121570": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "51232394": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 364", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 504" + ], + "512537": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 384", + "Section 323", + "Section 307", + "Section 336", + "Section 427", + "Section 448", + "Section 326", + "Section 147" + ], + "515224": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 325" + ], + "51565127": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "51578309": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 379" + ], + "51581797": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "5158445": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 323" + ], + "51591697": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 120B", + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 364" + ], + "51525108": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506" + ], + "51525307": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420" + ], + "51541674": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 438" + ], + "51611920": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 376", + "Section 161" + ], + "51620216": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "516463": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 376" + ], + "51647210": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 468" + ], + "51652190": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 419", + "Section 420", + "Section 120", + "Section 34" + ], + "51664923": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 506" + ], + "517381": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 384" + ], + "517541": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 109" + ], + "517546": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 427" + ], + "517572": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "51771963": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "51783257": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 427", + "Section 294" + ], + "51851814": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 320" + ], + "51880345": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 193" + ], + "518980": [ + "Section 409" + ], + "51899418": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 342" + ], + "51937289": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 326" + ], + "52040016": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 420" + ], + "52051792": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 438", + "Section 448", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "52059641": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A" + ], + "52059922": [ + "Section 336", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 201", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 304", + "Section 506", + "Section 504" + ], + "52063276": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 299", + "Section 323", + "Section 504" + ], + "5206376": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 308", + "Section 325" + ], + "520646": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 5" + ], + "5206676": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 120B", + "Section 148", + "Section 120", + "Section 353" + ], + "52747314": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 324", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 376" + ], + "52750218": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 465" + ], + "52756308": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 450", + "Section 173", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34" + ], + "52152737": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "52208790": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 307" + ], + "522466": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "52248454": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 201", + "Section 304", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 504" + ], + "522559": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 467", + "Section 325" + ], + "52496374": [ + "Section 395", + "Section 394" + ], + "524993": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120", + "Section 406", + "Section 120B" + ], + "5231341": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "52316389": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 448" + ], + "52322128": [ + "Section 186", + "Section 427", + "Section 332" + ], + "52324372": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "52326600": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 3" + ], + "52333351": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "52336734": [ + "Section 186", + "Section 34", + "Section 332", + "Section 307", + "Section 353", + "Section 427" + ], + "52339855": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 420" + ], + "529754": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 364", + "Section 148", + "Section 201", + "Section 323", + "Section 427", + "Section 120B" + ], + "52976735": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 294" + ], + "52702194": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 379", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 149" + ], + "52772025": [ + "Section 229A" + ], + "52809": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 324", + "Section 325", + "Section 149", + "Section 313", + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 148" + ], + "528332": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 324", + "Section 342" + ], + "52834611": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 147", + "Section 143", + "Section 149", + "Section 436", + "Section 148", + "Section 120B" + ], + "52844156": [ + "Section 155", + "Section 323", + "Section 452", + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 156", + "Section 354" + ], + "52912060": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 427", + "Section 332", + "Section 109", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 143", + "Section 147", + "Section 395", + "Section 420", + "Section 353" + ], + "52923971": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 13" + ], + "53042836": [ + "Section 452" + ], + "53048487": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 120B", + "Section 229A", + "Section 307", + "Section 174A", + "Section 302" + ], + "53055515": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 161", + "Section 302" + ], + "53025128": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 394" + ], + "53151877": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 448", + "Section 326" + ], + "53177835": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 506", + "Section 354" + ], + "53078216": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 465", + "Section 471", + "Section 420" + ], + "53080158": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 34", + "Section 307" + ], + "53088231": [ + "Section 363" + ], + "530935": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 109", + "Section 114", + "Section 34" + ], + "53069571": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 304" + ], + "53334890": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 498A" + ], + "53347972": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 354", + "Section 323" + ], + "53357978": [ + "Section 308", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 452", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 304", + "Section 34" + ], + "5388855": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 306" + ], + "53902197": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 397", + "Section 341" + ], + "53937742": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "53246077": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "53551221": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 143", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 438", + "Section 326", + "Section 149" + ], + "53551888": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 326", + "Section 324", + "Section 147", + "Section 307", + "Section 300" + ], + "53560729": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 379", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 438" + ], + "53560979": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 156", + "Section 415", + "Section 468", + "Section 482", + "Section 467" + ], + "53562449": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 294" + ], + "53280157": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 109", + "Section 34", + "Section 494" + ], + "53294491": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 364", + "Section 302" + ], + "53372064": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 324" + ], + "53378053": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A" + ], + "53403758": [ + "Section 156", + "Section 173", + "Section 504", + "Section 427", + "Section 190", + "Section 392", + "Section 155", + "Section 323", + "Section 506" + ], + "53417727": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "53419998": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 147", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 325", + "Section 324", + "Section 326" + ], + "535651": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 326", + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "535683": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 147" + ], + "535796": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 392" + ], + "536072": [ + "Section 161" + ], + "53613853": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "536214": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "53667897": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 341" + ], + "537167": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420" + ], + "53724460": [ + "Section 279", + "Section 337" + ], + "537382": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 4" + ], + "53816387": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 397" + ], + "539530": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 304" + ], + "53953915": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 294", + "Section 494" + ], + "53957209": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 353", + "Section 366", + "Section 307" + ], + "5398588": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 366", + "Section 375", + "Section 363" + ], + "540105": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 324", + "Section 342" + ], + "540190": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 324" + ], + "5403508": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 384" + ], + "54037198": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 326", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 147" + ], + "540434": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 308", + "Section 452", + "Section 324" + ], + "540986": [ + "Section 161" + ], + "54098881": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 161" + ], + "54103070": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 504", + "Section 302" + ], + "54104786": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 427", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 336", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 341", + "Section 302" + ], + "54127135": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 498A" + ], + "541304": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 304" + ], + "54174818": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 324" + ], + "54179195": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 397", + "Section 506", + "Section 394" + ], + "54199133": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "54217424": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "54223521": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 34", + "Section 354" + ], + "54247462": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A", + "Section 437", + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A" + ], + "5426147": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "54294676": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 471" + ], + "54305134": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 332", + "Section 300", + "Section 506", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "54324251": [ + "Section 149" + ], + "54327309": [ + "Section 452" + ], + "58207389": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 341" + ], + "58210358": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 147" + ], + "54390660": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "543932": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 304", + "Section 324" + ], + "544000": [ + "Section 304B" + ], + "544012": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 366", + "Section 504", + "Section 307", + "Section 395", + "Section 304", + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 397", + "Section 324", + "Section 411", + "Section 306", + "Section 149", + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 498A", + "Section 147", + "Section 354", + "Section 452" + ], + "54448418": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 326", + "Section 294" + ], + "54455528": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 4", + "Section 109", + "Section 341" + ], + "55466355": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 354" + ], + "554699": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 324" + ], + "557530": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 452", + "Section 506" + ], + "55785929": [ + "Section 304A" + ], + "55629726": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506" + ], + "557175": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "53832627": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 302" + ], + "53842569": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 109", + "Section 114" + ], + "53856926": [ + "Section 395", + "Section 397", + "Section 406" + ], + "53867": [ + "Section 13", + "Section 420", + "Section 109", + "Section 120", + "Section 506", + "Section 409" + ], + "53867907": [ + "Section 450", + "Section 376", + "Section 437" + ], + "54014506": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 395" + ], + "549496": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 500" + ], + "549605": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 392", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 3", + "Section 2" + ], + "549619": [ + "Section 304B" + ], + "54963115": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "54970380": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 366", + "Section 363" + ], + "54986027": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 420" + ], + "549946": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 200", + "Section 415", + "Section 406", + "Section 465", + "Section 120B", + "Section 468", + "Section 482" + ], + "549959": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "5499958": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 307" + ], + "55010127": [ + "Section 417", + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "55010643": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "55018897": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 468" + ], + "54750": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 392", + "Section 302" + ], + "54755190": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 506", + "Section 354" + ], + "5475762": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "546967": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 2", + "Section 420", + "Section 120" + ], + "54700288": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 156" + ], + "54701018": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 341", + "Section 326" + ], + "54706420": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "54735795": [ + "Section 375" + ], + "54473778": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 308", + "Section 34", + "Section 438", + "Section 448" + ], + "54480280": [ + "Section 304A" + ], + "544913": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 147" + ], + "544985": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 34" + ], + "544997": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "54778719": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 364", + "Section 394" + ], + "54790120": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 511", + "Section 376" + ], + "54791146": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 406", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 467" + ], + "547969": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 3", + "Section 498A", + "Section 498", + "Section 323", + "Section 506" + ], + "54806513": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 325", + "Section 427", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "55028254": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 323", + "Section 406" + ], + "55040115": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 498A", + "Section 392", + "Section 161", + "Section 324" + ], + "55045570": [ + "Section 395", + "Section 394" + ], + "55048708": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "55055135": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 392", + "Section 341" + ], + "550597": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 302" + ], + "550607": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "55225285": [ + "Section 509", + "Section 506" + ], + "55231244": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 438", + "Section 354", + "Section 307", + "Section 341", + "Section 325" + ], + "55399577": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "55416131": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 34", + "Section 364" + ], + "554364": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 164" + ], + "55437069": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 229A", + "Section 392", + "Section 323" + ], + "55452626": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "54814974": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 395", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 376", + "Section 313" + ], + "548218": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 307", + "Section 148" + ], + "548223": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 467" + ], + "54835529": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 427" + ], + "548374": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 504", + "Section 323" + ], + "548497": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "55717519": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 294" + ], + "55730970": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 353", + "Section 34", + "Section 186" + ], + "557394": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "559171": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 190" + ], + "5592619": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 306" + ], + "559280": [ + "Section 304B" + ], + "559312": [ + "Section 313", + "Section 147", + "Section 149", + "Section 323" + ], + "55957277": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 506" + ], + "55957407": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 304", + "Section 323" + ], + "55976581": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 375", + "Section 366A", + "Section 3", + "Section 511" + ], + "563592": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 342" + ], + "56362260": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 308", + "Section 427", + "Section 201", + "Section 420", + "Section 406" + ], + "56834483": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 294" + ], + "568386": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 304" + ], + "559978": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 379", + "Section 201", + "Section 190" + ], + "56178675": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 34", + "Section 341", + "Section 308", + "Section 307" + ], + "56188179": [ + "Section 436", + "Section 294" + ], + "561187": [ + "Section 397" + ], + "56132257": [ + "Section 13" + ], + "56138433": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 324" + ], + "56157608": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 465" + ], + "56175097": [ + "Section 465", + "Section 471", + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 409", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467", + "Section 156", + "Section 468" + ], + "55839018": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 147", + "Section 294", + "Section 148", + "Section 341" + ], + "558405": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 304", + "Section 149", + "Section 300", + "Section 504" + ], + "55842899": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 148", + "Section 506" + ], + "55849094": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 509", + "Section 506" + ], + "5585799": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "558583": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 279" + ], + "56271288": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 437" + ], + "563089": [ + "Section 363" + ], + "563096": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "56311720": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 325", + "Section 448", + "Section 326", + "Section 34" + ], + "563174": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 448", + "Section 4" + ], + "56331176": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 306", + "Section 438" + ], + "56336583": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "56340950": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 34", + "Section 447", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 354", + "Section 308", + "Section 156" + ], + "564411": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 342", + "Section 34", + "Section 417" + ], + "56399465": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 201", + "Section 34" + ], + "564091": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 337", + "Section 279", + "Section 338", + "Section 427" + ], + "56460071": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 406", + "Section 394", + "Section 420", + "Section 34" + ], + "56465524": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 366A", + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 109", + "Section 354", + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 511", + "Section 376" + ], + "564789": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 419" + ], + "56524": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 200", + "Section 325", + "Section 228", + "Section 147" + ], + "565339": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 13" + ], + "565378": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 325" + ], + "562199": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 313", + "Section 120B", + "Section 109" + ], + "56292302": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 294", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 324", + "Section 341", + "Section 307" + ], + "56831825": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 34", + "Section 228", + "Section 364", + "Section 4", + "Section 365" + ], + "57069428": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 149", + "Section 323", + "Section 304", + "Section 147", + "Section 308", + "Section 307" + ], + "565807": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 302", + "Section 120", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 397", + "Section 363", + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "56583412": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 304B", + "Section 34" + ], + "56596534": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 353", + "Section 324" + ], + "56598778": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 34", + "Section 120B" + ], + "56601644": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 504", + "Section 302", + "Section 147" + ], + "56760329": [ + "Section 500", + "Section 155", + "Section 201", + "Section 156", + "Section 482" + ], + "569079": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 148", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 147", + "Section 325" + ], + "56909245": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 173" + ], + "56697660": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 34", + "Section 300", + "Section 323", + "Section 304" + ], + "56702117": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 376" + ], + "56707293": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 341", + "Section 447", + "Section 427", + "Section 506" + ], + "56714999": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 394", + "Section 397" + ], + "56740687": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A", + "Section 107" + ], + "5674286": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 34", + "Section 452" + ], + "57134639": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 341" + ], + "571419": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "57143012": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 509", + "Section 506", + "Section 354" + ], + "56777315": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 452", + "Section 304", + "Section 300" + ], + "568227": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 326", + "Section 506" + ], + "56881088": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 420", + "Section 376", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 498A", + "Section 447", + "Section 193" + ], + "569726": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 498A", + "Section 307", + "Section 313" + ], + "569739": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 300" + ], + "569814": [ + "Section 190", + "Section 120B", + "Section 482", + "Section 326", + "Section 164", + "Section 161", + "Section 436" + ], + "571690": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 302", + "Section 325", + "Section 323" + ], + "571720": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 450", + "Section 34" + ], + "57189": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 366", + "Section 504", + "Section 307", + "Section 395", + "Section 304", + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 397", + "Section 324", + "Section 411", + "Section 306", + "Section 149", + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 498A", + "Section 147", + "Section 354", + "Section 452" + ], + "57192670": [ + "Section 279", + "Section 304A" + ], + "571945": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 304" + ], + "57218163": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 366" + ], + "57226673": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 509", + "Section 341", + "Section 4" + ], + "57229080": [ + "Section 365", + "Section 509", + "Section 506", + "Section 120B", + "Section 376", + "Section 323" + ], + "572710": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "57277213": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 326", + "Section 324" + ], + "57288311": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 120B", + "Section 376" + ], + "57301741": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 506", + "Section 437" + ], + "57306937": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 34", + "Section 3" + ], + "573113": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "57315239": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A" + ], + "5746013": [ + "Section 193" + ], + "574728": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "574315": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 376", + "Section 306" + ], + "57433258": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 306", + "Section 34" + ], + "574449": [ + "Section 457", + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34" + ], + "57451462": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 324", + "Section 506" + ], + "5761165": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 506", + "Section 376" + ], + "57643790": [ + "Section 494", + "Section 120B", + "Section 498", + "Section 34" + ], + "57658126": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 427", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 332", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 326", + "Section 149" + ], + "579822": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 509", + "Section 341", + "Section 342", + "Section 482", + "Section 307", + "Section 156" + ], + "58024681": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 397", + "Section 392" + ], + "58043012": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 427", + "Section 506", + "Section 448", + "Section 34" + ], + "58120784": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 354" + ], + "58121924": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "58132820": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 34" + ], + "58133859": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420" + ], + "58133988": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "58134824": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 306", + "Section 34" + ], + "58138": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 506" + ], + "58140939": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 354", + "Section 406", + "Section 498A" + ], + "58064331": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "58065733": [ + "Section 509", + "Section 354", + "Section 294" + ], + "58065916": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "5807233": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 438" + ], + "58101459": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "58108613": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 506", + "Section 498" + ], + "581087": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 409", + "Section 468" + ], + "58278241": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 34" + ], + "582532": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "58225268": [ + "Section 186", + "Section 294", + "Section 332", + "Section 353" + ], + "58233942": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 498A", + "Section 307" + ], + "58237636": [ + "Section 5" + ], + "58369309": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306" + ], + "58380572": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 325", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "58407395": [ + "Section 190", + "Section 34" + ], + "584096": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 452", + "Section 300", + "Section 304", + "Section 323" + ], + "58488955": [ + "Section 447", + "Section 188", + "Section 323", + "Section 326", + "Section 325", + "Section 186" + ], + "58498972": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "585102": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 457", + "Section 411" + ], + "58664274": [ + "Section 308", + "Section 188", + "Section 376", + "Section 336", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 34" + ], + "58847993": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 120B", + "Section 342" + ], + "58681": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 306", + "Section 201", + "Section 498A" + ], + "58697332": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "587027": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "5876425": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 294" + ], + "58775931": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 504" + ], + "5879660": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 323" + ], + "588001": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 34" + ], + "58814388": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 147" + ], + "58843013": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 420" + ], + "59031110": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 34", + "Section 306", + "Section 498" + ], + "59035078": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 354", + "Section 323", + "Section 427" + ], + "59037183": [ + "Section 365", + "Section 363", + "Section 302" + ], + "59041424": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 452", + "Section 498A", + "Section 354", + "Section 323" + ], + "59043263": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 326", + "Section 323" + ], + "59049109": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 323" + ], + "59052247": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 420", + "Section 419", + "Section 411" + ], + "59063492": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 307", + "Section 164", + "Section 156" + ], + "59072480": [ + "Section 375", + "Section 2" + ], + "59211083": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "59216585": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 384", + "Section 447", + "Section 147" + ], + "591754": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 302" + ], + "59178910": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 120B", + "Section 406", + "Section 323", + "Section 397" + ], + "59272217": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 3", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 323", + "Section 164", + "Section 506", + "Section 161" + ], + "59283315": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A", + "Section 471", + "Section 468" + ], + "59290170": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 324", + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 148" + ], + "59293936": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A", + "Section 107", + "Section 304B", + "Section 498" + ], + "592458": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 156", + "Section 193", + "Section 482", + "Section 190", + "Section 467", + "Section 498A", + "Section 465", + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 188" + ], + "5925699": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "59414114": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "59414339": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 306" + ], + "594157": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 406", + "Section 155", + "Section 156", + "Section 482" + ], + "59421996": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 437" + ], + "59422601": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 307" + ], + "59366129": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 498A", + "Section 511" + ], + "59377570": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 308", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 354", + "Section 326" + ], + "59384877": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 325", + "Section 156" + ], + "59397261": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 506", + "Section 156" + ], + "59402536": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 147", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 326" + ], + "594048": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 304", + "Section 338" + ], + "594859": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 353", + "Section 506", + "Section 450", + "Section 395", + "Section 149" + ], + "59495144": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366A", + "Section 376", + "Section 366" + ], + "59497453": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 307", + "Section 379" + ], + "59497709": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "59498973": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 406", + "Section 320", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "59547471": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 437", + "Section 376" + ], + "5955697": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 120B" + ], + "59571787": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 324", + "Section 323" + ], + "59572756": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 307" + ], + "595837": [ + "Section 308", + "Section 420", + "Section 34", + "Section 156", + "Section 498A", + "Section 406" + ], + "59597914": [ + "Section 419", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B" + ], + "59660844": [ + "Section 389", + "Section 384" + ], + "5972234": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 420" + ], + "59723189": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "59726322": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 323" + ], + "59728372": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A" + ], + "598152": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 376", + "Section 302", + "Section 363" + ], + "598156": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 302" + ], + "59818669": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 34" + ], + "60784622": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "60785918": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 437" + ], + "607920": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 498" + ], + "60847864": [ + "Section 415", + "Section 120B" + ], + "60853707": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 325", + "Section 438" + ], + "608365": [ + "Section 279", + "Section 34" + ], + "60838": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 406", + "Section 120B", + "Section 120", + "Section 468", + "Section 161" + ], + "60840616": [ + "Section 452" + ], + "60363320": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 438", + "Section 467" + ], + "60380558": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 188", + "Section 509", + "Section 307", + "Section 447", + "Section 354", + "Section 325" + ], + "603862": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 302" + ], + "601102": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "60130578": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406" + ], + "601422": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B" + ], + "60169110": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 313", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 417", + "Section 341" + ], + "60203163": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 395", + "Section 323", + "Section 427", + "Section 452", + "Section 148", + "Section 436", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 120B", + "Section 149", + "Section 397", + "Section 353", + "Section 186", + "Section 332", + "Section 336", + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 143" + ], + "602075": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 308", + "Section 395", + "Section 324", + "Section 148" + ], + "60217168": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 341", + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "60226526": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 326", + "Section 354", + "Section 307", + "Section 304" + ], + "60344746": [ + "Section 389" + ], + "60345864": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 143", + "Section 325", + "Section 307", + "Section 302" + ], + "60346759": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 323", + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 406", + "Section 504", + "Section 498A" + ], + "6097458": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 354" + ], + "61109383": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 149" + ], + "611835": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 342", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 364", + "Section 120B", + "Section 201", + "Section 336", + "Section 323" + ], + "605755": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "610155": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "61034899": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 3" + ], + "610843": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 511" + ], + "61091154": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 379", + "Section 34", + "Section 364" + ], + "610786": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 148" + ], + "61111374": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "61112494": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 471" + ], + "61113797": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 302" + ], + "61118361": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 323" + ], + "618723": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 392", + "Section 364", + "Section 109", + "Section 379" + ], + "61889182": [ + "Section 156", + "Section 200", + "Section 420", + "Section 409", + "Section 406" + ], + "61901185": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 504", + "Section 323" + ], + "61152203": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 427", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 506" + ], + "611665": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "61181468": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 323" + ], + "611834": [ + "Section 419", + "Section 415" + ], + "60885515": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 447", + "Section 325", + "Section 427", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 307" + ], + "608939": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "609298": [ + "Section 494", + "Section 114" + ], + "60942326": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "60943466": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 34" + ], + "60973602": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 342", + "Section 376" + ], + "614983": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "616485": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 307" + ], + "61669461": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 436", + "Section 448", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 326" + ], + "61669784": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 320", + "Section 324" + ], + "61586335": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "616054": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 341", + "Section 147", + "Section 427", + "Section 332", + "Section 302", + "Section 447" + ], + "61606153": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 366" + ], + "61614201": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 313" + ], + "61622620": [ + "Section 4", + "Section 452" + ], + "61624003": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 332", + "Section 34", + "Section 186" + ], + "613163": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 34" + ], + "613188": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 452", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 307" + ], + "61538351": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 452", + "Section 506", + "Section 498A", + "Section 406" + ], + "61675353": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A" + ], + "61706990": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 498A", + "Section 313" + ], + "61740572": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "61741162": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 325", + "Section 326", + "Section 341" + ], + "61756059": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "61813872": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 450", + "Section 376" + ], + "61817364": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 436", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 332", + "Section 148", + "Section 379", + "Section 427", + "Section 149", + "Section 186" + ], + "618328": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 323", + "Section 200", + "Section 120B", + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 353" + ], + "618566": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 308", + "Section 376" + ], + "61715949": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 120B", + "Section 307" + ], + "61927871": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 376" + ], + "62220727": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 448", + "Section 509", + "Section 120B", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "62221086": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 354" + ], + "62233506": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 504", + "Section 406", + "Section 120B", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "62233890": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "62248223": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 450" + ], + "61904359": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "61918339": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "61924175": [ + "Section 415", + "Section 420", + "Section 320", + "Section 34" + ], + "61948405": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "619510": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 114" + ], + "619615": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B" + ], + "61974237": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 34", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 379", + "Section 447" + ], + "61991315": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 354", + "Section 509", + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 438" + ], + "624551": [ + "Section 482" + ], + "624560": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "624638": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 147" + ], + "623530": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 342", + "Section 504", + "Section 156", + "Section 364", + "Section 384", + "Section 376", + "Section 323" + ], + "6236446": [ + "Section 417", + "Section 190", + "Section 193" + ], + "62372001": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 498A", + "Section 437" + ], + "62384783": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 504" + ], + "6239007": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "62396687": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 353", + "Section 147" + ], + "62409765": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 326", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 452" + ], + "624175": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 120", + "Section 304B", + "Section 304", + "Section 120B" + ], + "62424": [ + "Section 494" + ], + "62485054": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 120" + ], + "625704": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 34" + ], + "62579844": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 294" + ], + "62580554": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 325", + "Section 323" + ], + "625911": [ + "Section 120B" + ], + "62299156": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 365", + "Section 366A" + ], + "62306673": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 307", + "Section 147", + "Section 149" + ], + "62313927": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 313" + ], + "6232970": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 376", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 468" + ], + "62063390": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 294", + "Section 149", + "Section 452" + ], + "62063964": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 323" + ], + "62068772": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 354", + "Section 447", + "Section 438" + ], + "62079921": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 2", + "Section 302" + ], + "620891": [ + "Section 120B" + ], + "627409": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 324" + ], + "627470": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "627930": [ + "Section 465", + "Section 471", + "Section 200", + "Section 193" + ], + "62797707": [ + "Section 174A" + ], + "62877996": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 364" + ], + "62881176": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294" + ], + "628849": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 5", + "Section 120B" + ], + "62903226": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 506" + ], + "62908468": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 336", + "Section 294" + ], + "62970442": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "629848": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "63008159": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 120B" + ], + "63011228": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467", + "Section 409" + ], + "63011464": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 34", + "Section 148", + "Section 304", + "Section 107", + "Section 302" + ], + "63011477": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 341", + "Section 147" + ], + "630154": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 161", + "Section 107", + "Section 313", + "Section 164" + ], + "63016898": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "63017876": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 394" + ], + "63875178": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 193", + "Section 419", + "Section 294", + "Section 173", + "Section 471" + ], + "6399883": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 392", + "Section 323" + ], + "64466075": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "632204": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 394", + "Section 411", + "Section 156" + ], + "63221803": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 498A", + "Section 498" + ], + "632994": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 324" + ], + "632408": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "63242104": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 120B", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 300", + "Section 34" + ], + "632451": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 109", + "Section 201", + "Section 306", + "Section 376", + "Section 34", + "Section 307" + ], + "63259": [ + "Section 304A" + ], + "63817": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 148" + ], + "6382415": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "6351992": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 406", + "Section 471", + "Section 419" + ], + "63521614": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107" + ], + "62801428": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 354" + ], + "63061891": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 324", + "Section 504" + ], + "63069230": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 427", + "Section 279", + "Section 188", + "Section 332", + "Section 229A", + "Section 353", + "Section 308", + "Section 338", + "Section 337" + ], + "63076805": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 506", + "Section 448", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "63094141": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "63587254": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 34", + "Section 161", + "Section 467", + "Section 409", + "Section 465", + "Section 471", + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 468" + ], + "63595403": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 448", + "Section 376", + "Section 438" + ], + "63608392": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 419", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 409", + "Section 379", + "Section 155", + "Section 156", + "Section 201", + "Section 323", + "Section 173", + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "63620087": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "63620942": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "636237": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "63627278": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A" + ], + "636276": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 354", + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 326", + "Section 506", + "Section 341" + ], + "63641433": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 354", + "Section 504", + "Section 450", + "Section 109", + "Section 376", + "Section 34", + "Section 325" + ], + "63654168": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 306" + ], + "63903182": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "639135": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 299", + "Section 302" + ], + "63927010": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 504", + "Section 307", + "Section 313", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 326", + "Section 392", + "Section 324", + "Section 427", + "Section 354" + ], + "63935579": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 427", + "Section 107", + "Section 307", + "Section 448", + "Section 509", + "Section 506", + "Section 379", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 34" + ], + "63698536": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 320" + ], + "63745": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 366" + ], + "63752614": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "637657": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 304", + "Section 324" + ], + "63371455": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 34" + ], + "633787": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307" + ], + "63378751": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 438" + ], + "633802": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 149", + "Section 307" + ], + "63980787": [ + "Section 365", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 392" + ], + "6399965": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 341", + "Section 313", + "Section 354", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 143" + ], + "64021544": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 504", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 149" + ], + "640234": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 353", + "Section 506", + "Section 448" + ], + "640318": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "64052738": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 354", + "Section 34", + "Section 341", + "Section 438", + "Section 326" + ], + "64193269": [ + "Section 155", + "Section 482", + "Section 498A", + "Section 156" + ], + "64196225": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 308", + "Section 452" + ], + "6411902": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 506", + "Section 326" + ], + "64119331": [ + "Section 304A" + ], + "64120135": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "64157960": [ + "Section 457", + "Section 380", + "Section 307", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 384" + ], + "641653": [ + "Section 313", + "Section 363" + ], + "64267441": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 320" + ], + "642794": [ + "Section 465", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 468" + ], + "64295895": [ + "Section 320", + "Section 34" + ], + "64305819": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 326" + ], + "64311513": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 406", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "64322692": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 506" + ], + "64495035": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "644973": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 149" + ], + "64502480": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 376" + ], + "643499": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "64354": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "64368943": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 506", + "Section 406", + "Section 120", + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 34", + "Section 417", + "Section 415", + "Section 409" + ], + "6438331": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "644043": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 149", + "Section 452", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 143" + ], + "64420360": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 354", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "644306": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "64441964": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 186", + "Section 307" + ], + "64455133": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "64600872": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 437" + ], + "646135": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 379", + "Section 354" + ], + "64618194": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "646345": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 342" + ], + "64639761": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 341", + "Section 447", + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "646544": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 120B", + "Section 438" + ], + "64666541": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 147" + ], + "64674795": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 120B", + "Section 437" + ], + "64962333": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "64729339": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 307" + ], + "64758810": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B" + ], + "64767264": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 34", + "Section 147" + ], + "647700": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 188", + "Section 186", + "Section 509", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "64779062": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 482", + "Section 320" + ], + "64781386": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 294" + ], + "6498176": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 468" + ], + "64814331": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107" + ], + "64878907": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366A", + "Section 120B" + ], + "65092130": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 325" + ], + "6510771": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498", + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 307", + "Section 341", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 325" + ], + "65108166": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 34" + ], + "65114802": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 498A", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 448" + ], + "651826": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 384" + ], + "651999": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 201" + ], + "65213465": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 34" + ], + "652149": [ + "Section 228" + ], + "65132935": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 324" + ], + "65267199": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 506", + "Section 438", + "Section 342", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "65292545": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 304B" + ], + "65312883": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 107" + ], + "65398653": [ + "Section 509", + "Section 323" + ], + "65401304": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "654021": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 304", + "Section 498A" + ], + "65406532": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 471", + "Section 406", + "Section 468" + ], + "65742016": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 379", + "Section 201" + ], + "65816212": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 193" + ], + "65819874": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 302" + ], + "65820835": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 147" + ], + "657613": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 380", + "Section 411" + ], + "65761827": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 506" + ], + "65788970": [ + "Section 279", + "Section 304A" + ], + "658878": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 307" + ], + "65888461": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 509" + ], + "65895504": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 504", + "Section 336", + "Section 323", + "Section 143", + "Section 326" + ], + "65912486": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 306", + "Section 498", + "Section 107", + "Section 498A" + ], + "65916817": [ + "Section 188" + ], + "660451": [ + "Section 447", + "Section 148", + "Section 201", + "Section 149" + ], + "66090249": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 354" + ], + "660965": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 114", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 304", + "Section 324" + ], + "66097348": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 376", + "Section 366", + "Section 363" + ], + "65971686": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "659925": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 3", + "Section 34" + ], + "65996434": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 34" + ], + "66405912": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "66430973": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 302", + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "66443573": [ + "Section 384", + "Section 506", + "Section 420", + "Section 354", + "Section 365", + "Section 323" + ], + "66347414": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 341", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 397" + ], + "663573": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 147", + "Section 148" + ], + "66367921": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 34", + "Section 427", + "Section 448", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 354" + ], + "663784": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506" + ], + "66186489": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "66194488": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "66196834": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 4", + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 3" + ], + "66211456": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 504", + "Section 109", + "Section 506" + ], + "66147735": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 341" + ], + "66147741": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 465", + "Section 427", + "Section 420", + "Section 188", + "Section 415", + "Section 324", + "Section 200", + "Section 193", + "Section 120", + "Section 506" + ], + "66149171": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 450" + ], + "66167092": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "664488": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 306", + "Section 498A" + ], + "66455458": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506" + ], + "66458033": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "66464434": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 188", + "Section 120B", + "Section 379", + "Section 156" + ], + "664758": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 468" + ], + "66479798": [ + "Section 313", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A" + ], + "66502477": [ + "Section 336", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "66505558": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 325", + "Section 323" + ], + "66519721": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 504" + ], + "66526896": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 392" + ], + "665289": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "66533225": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A" + ], + "66697356": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 325", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 149" + ], + "667023": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 366A" + ], + "667073": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 120B", + "Section 109" + ], + "66660439": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "66667618": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 465", + "Section 420", + "Section 406" + ], + "66677545": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 120B", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "6717001": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 34", + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 299" + ], + "67187427": [ + "Section 409" + ], + "67199487": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "667816": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 323" + ], + "66788076": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304B", + "Section 304" + ], + "667941": [ + "Section 364", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 294", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 324" + ], + "667950": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "66806599": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 307", + "Section 438" + ], + "668257": [ + "Section 500" + ], + "669955": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 114" + ], + "67004264": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 406" + ], + "67211751": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 3", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 341" + ], + "67221347": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 506", + "Section 324", + "Section 379", + "Section 341", + "Section 323" + ], + "672334": [ + "Section 482" + ], + "67233913": [ + "Section 366" + ], + "67271499": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 120B", + "Section 509", + "Section 307", + "Section 326" + ], + "67295945": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 304", + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 342", + "Section 323", + "Section 147" + ], + "673067": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "67368108": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 279" + ], + "67373036": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "67383254": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 392" + ], + "67386765": [ + "Section 452" + ], + "67387343": [ + "Section 186", + "Section 353", + "Section 294" + ], + "67468133": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 376" + ], + "67472001": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 354" + ], + "67494768": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 342", + "Section 341", + "Section 147", + "Section 452", + "Section 294", + "Section 354", + "Section 395", + "Section 494" + ], + "674949": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 406" + ], + "674207": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 511" + ], + "674311": [ + "Section 120", + "Section 302" + ], + "67431630": [ + "Section 200", + "Section 471", + "Section 193", + "Section 468", + "Section 465" + ], + "68223497": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 397" + ], + "68235190": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 336", + "Section 149", + "Section 188", + "Section 411", + "Section 173" + ], + "68241849": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "67913181": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A" + ], + "67925": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 4", + "Section 120B", + "Section 380", + "Section 161", + "Section 147", + "Section 448", + "Section 341", + "Section 193" + ], + "676283": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 325", + "Section 147" + ], + "67629687": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498" + ], + "67631939": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 307", + "Section 353", + "Section 326", + "Section 332", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 325", + "Section 186" + ], + "676509": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 323" + ], + "67651565": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 506", + "Section 452" + ], + "67667597": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467" + ], + "67669265": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 304", + "Section 324", + "Section 308", + "Section 147" + ], + "67678363": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 504" + ], + "67708556": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 147" + ], + "67719804": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 436", + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "67732363": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 509", + "Section 438", + "Section 506" + ], + "677372": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 420" + ], + "677388": [ + "Section 2", + "Section 406" + ], + "6774": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 313" + ], + "67741371": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 397", + "Section 506", + "Section 394" + ], + "67842983": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "678439": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 465" + ], + "67844806": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 427", + "Section 148", + "Section 332", + "Section 307", + "Section 353", + "Section 147", + "Section 186", + "Section 325" + ], + "67794543": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "680526": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 409" + ], + "680543": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 149", + "Section 148" + ], + "68056472": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "6799645": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "6810426": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 188" + ], + "68183949": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 436", + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 427", + "Section 149", + "Section 147" + ], + "68190921": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "71210110": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 420", + "Section 307", + "Section 147" + ], + "71220880": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "712382": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 188" + ], + "70372016": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 498A", + "Section 307", + "Section 438", + "Section 342", + "Section 34" + ], + "70401412": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 34" + ], + "6845007": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 419", + "Section 467" + ], + "68456493": [ + "Section 494", + "Section 109", + "Section 498A" + ], + "68461388": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107", + "Section 34", + "Section 307" + ], + "684086": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "68416584": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 354", + "Section 448", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 427" + ], + "68418840": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302" + ], + "68437347": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 452" + ], + "68465203": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 338", + "Section 337", + "Section 279", + "Section 304A", + "Section 397" + ], + "684676": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 457" + ], + "68470908": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 437" + ], + "6848376": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "69168850": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 498", + "Section 304", + "Section 304B" + ], + "69219599": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 147" + ], + "69461850": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 164", + "Section 313" + ], + "6857629": [ + "Section 320", + "Section 482", + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 420" + ], + "68600054": [ + "Section 389", + "Section 324" + ], + "67547945": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "6812046": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "68142037": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "68629435": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 506", + "Section 120B" + ], + "68683909": [ + "Section 364", + "Section 342", + "Section 395" + ], + "68685013": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A" + ], + "68689784": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "68696327": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 302", + "Section 397", + "Section 376", + "Section 201", + "Section 365", + "Section 307", + "Section 395", + "Section 366" + ], + "687095": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 307" + ], + "68710097": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 143" + ], + "68873628": [ + "Section 201" + ], + "68881710": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "68908553": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 406", + "Section 504", + "Section 155", + "Section 156", + "Section 482" + ], + "68913884": [ + "Section 304B" + ], + "68968034": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 354", + "Section 482" + ], + "6915815": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 34", + "Section 394" + ], + "69163": [ + "Section 498A" + ], + "69164470": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 109" + ], + "69221395": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "69225949": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 406", + "Section 320", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "69231520": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "69239079": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 411", + "Section 380" + ], + "69256258": [ + "Section 164", + "Section 366", + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 375", + "Section 313" + ], + "69274262": [ + "Section 143", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 427", + "Section 332", + "Section 186", + "Section 34" + ], + "69359291": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 120B", + "Section 406", + "Section 417", + "Section 363", + "Section 332", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 302" + ], + "69393556": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 34", + "Section 308", + "Section 448", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 427" + ], + "69406415": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 34" + ], + "694079": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 467", + "Section 471" + ], + "69481543": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "69488217": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 188", + "Section 148", + "Section 143", + "Section 147" + ], + "69506829": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 332", + "Section 353", + "Section 341" + ], + "69509158": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 306", + "Section 498A" + ], + "695110": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 228" + ], + "70026631": [ + "Section 228" + ], + "700303": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 471" + ], + "69600608": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 147", + "Section 354", + "Section 447", + "Section 34", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 427", + "Section 149" + ], + "69605487": [ + "Section 447", + "Section 143", + "Section 506", + "Section 342", + "Section 504", + "Section 120B", + "Section 468", + "Section 465", + "Section 471" + ], + "69856970": [ + "Section 494" + ], + "698665": [ + "Section 193" + ], + "69873930": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 436", + "Section 380" + ], + "69874286": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 302" + ], + "6989": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "69972548": [ + "Section 363" + ], + "69972738": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "69984398": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "69994712": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 279", + "Section 304", + "Section 337", + "Section 338", + "Section 300", + "Section 299", + "Section 302" + ], + "70011085": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 452", + "Section 379" + ], + "70209652": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "702098": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 164", + "Section 300", + "Section 304" + ], + "70850260": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "70889923": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 34", + "Section 107", + "Section 376" + ], + "70915018": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 448", + "Section 147" + ], + "70713658": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 34", + "Section 320", + "Section 120B", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 323", + "Section 174A", + "Section 465", + "Section 420", + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 506", + "Section 504" + ], + "70720873": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 420" + ], + "707231": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 306", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 107" + ], + "70741805": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376" + ], + "706654": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 304", + "Section 324" + ], + "70668979": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "70681609": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 420", + "Section 468" + ], + "70683823": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 342", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "70691166": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 324" + ], + "7070949": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "70763420": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 114", + "Section 509", + "Section 506", + "Section 354" + ], + "69907649": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "70242759": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 201" + ], + "70305480": [ + "Section 389" + ], + "703250": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 149", + "Section 5", + "Section 323", + "Section 302", + "Section 313", + "Section 465", + "Section 148" + ], + "703517": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "70532813": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 427", + "Section 448" + ], + "70542687": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 186" + ], + "705484": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B" + ], + "705509": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 307", + "Section 109" + ], + "70610763": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 364", + "Section 365", + "Section 323", + "Section 406", + "Section 504", + "Section 452", + "Section 3", + "Section 354" + ], + "71009784": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107" + ], + "7101": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 392", + "Section 307", + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 326" + ], + "71015009": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "71015226": [ + "Section 164" + ], + "710305": [ + "Section 482" + ], + "71040413": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A" + ], + "71047899": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 306", + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A" + ], + "709655": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 338", + "Section 279" + ], + "709662": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 193", + "Section 471" + ], + "709710": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467", + "Section 482", + "Section 468" + ], + "71181": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "71188897": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 34", + "Section 506" + ], + "71122445": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 325", + "Section 323" + ], + "71131673": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 148" + ], + "71488532": [ + "Section 304B" + ], + "7149604": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "71499009": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 341", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 397" + ], + "71503206": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 120", + "Section 3", + "Section 427", + "Section 302", + "Section 143", + "Section 147" + ], + "71505801": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "71265944": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "712820": [ + "Section 395" + ], + "71285293": [ + "Section 389" + ], + "712911": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "7130025": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 304" + ], + "713005": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 506", + "Section 397" + ], + "7130738": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 120B", + "Section 307", + "Section 504", + "Section 302" + ], + "7134680": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 506" + ], + "71359905": [ + "Section 417", + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "71406434": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 427", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 332", + "Section 188", + "Section 338", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 354", + "Section 149", + "Section 325", + "Section 186" + ], + "71419749": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 420", + "Section 354", + "Section 511", + "Section 506" + ], + "71431": [ + "Section 364", + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 342" + ], + "71437965": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 380", + "Section 457" + ], + "714450": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 304" + ], + "71554705": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 447", + "Section 147" + ], + "71560726": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 397" + ], + "71565753": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 120B" + ], + "716921": [ + "Section 201" + ], + "716957": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420" + ], + "717070": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 5", + "Section 395" + ], + "71636549": [ + "Section 228", + "Section 193" + ], + "71646265": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 323", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 482" + ], + "716606": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 34", + "Section 155", + "Section 156", + "Section 482" + ], + "72213695": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 406", + "Section 420" + ], + "72223596": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "72223614": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 406", + "Section 498A", + "Section 320" + ], + "72230788": [ + "Section 143", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 114", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 504" + ], + "72233": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 506", + "Section 294" + ], + "722356": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 395", + "Section 326" + ], + "722395": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 156", + "Section 302", + "Section 427", + "Section 149" + ], + "72242691": [ + "Section 389" + ], + "72250": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 452", + "Section 406", + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 457" + ], + "72252839": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 324", + "Section 302", + "Section 325", + "Section 326" + ], + "72254664": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "72002504": [ + "Section 173" + ], + "72006790": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "7173829": [ + "Section 143", + "Section 147", + "Section 448" + ], + "71742043": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 323", + "Section 326" + ], + "7174503": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "7176": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "7177869": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 307", + "Section 332", + "Section 148", + "Section 326", + "Section 149", + "Section 325", + "Section 186" + ], + "717982": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 34" + ], + "71802527": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363" + ], + "72490784": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "724960": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 307" + ], + "72579984": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 389" + ], + "72596804": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 294", + "Section 186", + "Section 332" + ], + "73159263": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 147" + ], + "72109029": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 342", + "Section 437" + ], + "72114144": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 419", + "Section 506" + ], + "71830961": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 307", + "Section 438" + ], + "72058118": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "72256709": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 120B" + ], + "727547": [ + "Section 494", + "Section 406", + "Section 120", + "Section 482", + "Section 120B" + ], + "7218254": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 452", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 307", + "Section 354", + "Section 325" + ], + "72187374": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 450" + ], + "72192904": [ + "Section 395", + "Section 392" + ], + "722063": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 313", + "Section 300" + ], + "722945": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 313" + ], + "72325": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 304" + ], + "723389": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 188" + ], + "72347078": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 498", + "Section 304B" + ], + "72658439": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 419", + "Section 415" + ], + "72673160": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 366", + "Section 392", + "Section 354" + ], + "72694008": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 366" + ], + "72697391": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "72700090": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "727331": [ + "Section 304A" + ], + "72742720": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 498", + "Section 506" + ], + "72750820": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 201", + "Section 34" + ], + "7275126": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "72991545": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306" + ], + "729221": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 471" + ], + "729391": [ + "Section 161" + ], + "7294843": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 427", + "Section 300" + ], + "72404366": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "72408466": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 498A", + "Section 325" + ], + "72410051": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 379", + "Section 438", + "Section 326", + "Section 447" + ], + "72427855": [ + "Section 365", + "Section 148" + ], + "72845682": [ + "Section 366" + ], + "728469": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 326", + "Section 324", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 323" + ], + "72866714": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "72874865": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "72894497": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 392" + ], + "73261": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 376" + ], + "73271904": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 468", + "Section 465", + "Section 420" + ], + "73277952": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 34" + ], + "73192598": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 324" + ], + "73209248": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "73224759": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "73296": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 324", + "Section 326", + "Section 148", + "Section 427", + "Section 143", + "Section 307", + "Section 448", + "Section 147", + "Section 313" + ], + "73310969": [ + "Section 395" + ], + "73336469": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 325" + ], + "733424": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 120B", + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 465", + "Section 5", + "Section 420" + ], + "73353969": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 506", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 419", + "Section 155", + "Section 482", + "Section 156", + "Section 467", + "Section 173", + "Section 406" + ], + "73462223": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B" + ], + "73464611": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 380", + "Section 341", + "Section 457", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 397" + ], + "73480268": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 420" + ], + "73480450": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 457" + ], + "73883620": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 302" + ], + "738920": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 420" + ], + "73896514": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "7390218": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 304" + ], + "73904907": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 363" + ], + "735004": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 336", + "Section 323" + ], + "735295": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 323", + "Section 354", + "Section 307", + "Section 437" + ], + "73573744": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498" + ], + "73575091": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "73580694": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "73593400": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "73602735": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "73672546": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 143", + "Section 148" + ], + "736838": [ + "Section 161" + ], + "736865": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304" + ], + "73807981": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 279" + ], + "738125": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 313", + "Section 323" + ], + "73834931": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 420" + ], + "73837688": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 448", + "Section 427", + "Section 120B", + "Section 148", + "Section 164", + "Section 149", + "Section 379", + "Section 173", + "Section 354", + "Section 504", + "Section 506" + ], + "74008626": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 201", + "Section 427", + "Section 506" + ], + "74014727": [ + "Section 375", + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 366A", + "Section 320", + "Section 482", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "740235": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 109", + "Section 468", + "Section 34", + "Section 120B", + "Section 471", + "Section 409", + "Section 417", + "Section 120", + "Section 467" + ], + "74024055": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 304", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 325", + "Section 342" + ], + "740262": [ + "Section 156", + "Section 190", + "Section 173", + "Section 448", + "Section 498A", + "Section 2", + "Section 342", + "Section 323", + "Section 482", + "Section 406", + "Section 147" + ], + "74085529": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 304", + "Section 325", + "Section 34", + "Section 504", + "Section 324", + "Section 148" + ], + "74309355": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 143" + ], + "74314489": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 397", + "Section 411", + "Section 34" + ], + "74317404": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 120B", + "Section 308", + "Section 504", + "Section 411", + "Section 354", + "Section 34", + "Section 376", + "Section 342", + "Section 394", + "Section 498A" + ], + "743187": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 506" + ], + "74322356": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 155", + "Section 482", + "Section 156" + ], + "739959": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "74099204": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304B" + ], + "74248274": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "74302089": [ + "Section 308", + "Section 366", + "Section 363" + ], + "74180870": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 509", + "Section 438", + "Section 506" + ], + "7421128": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "74274587": [ + "Section 511", + "Section 452" + ], + "74296926": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 120B" + ], + "74379299": [ + "Section 143", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 188", + "Section 186", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "7438729": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "74409352": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 341", + "Section 147", + "Section 120", + "Section 468", + "Section 379" + ], + "744103": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 392", + "Section 394" + ], + "74410587": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 366" + ], + "74416488": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 342" + ], + "744295": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "74438051": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 161", + "Section 34" + ], + "74707369": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 353", + "Section 149", + "Section 427", + "Section 448", + "Section 143", + "Section 409", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 406", + "Section 173" + ], + "7470773": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 342", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "74754509": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A" + ], + "74771714": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 354" + ], + "74780232": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 155", + "Section 467", + "Section 482", + "Section 156", + "Section 190" + ], + "747819": [ + "Section 364", + "Section 120B" + ], + "748054": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "7481132": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "7481705": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 326", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 143", + "Section 504", + "Section 506" + ], + "7492422": [ + "Section 363" + ], + "74930515": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 384" + ], + "74933238": [ + "Section 436", + "Section 500", + "Section 294" + ], + "74906620": [ + "Section 511", + "Section 417", + "Section 313", + "Section 411", + "Section 2" + ], + "75289243": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 302" + ], + "753049": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 34", + "Section 471", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467", + "Section 482" + ], + "75307186": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 120B" + ], + "75410773": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 337", + "Section 338", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 332", + "Section 341", + "Section 148", + "Section 186", + "Section 427", + "Section 149" + ], + "75417138": [ + "Section 395", + "Section 342", + "Section 341", + "Section 120", + "Section 114", + "Section 452" + ], + "75419210": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 364" + ], + "74979770": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "749800": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "750103": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "75010859": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "750113": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 34" + ], + "75021805": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 323", + "Section 148", + "Section 324", + "Section 504", + "Section 417", + "Section 147", + "Section 149" + ], + "75027169": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "750539": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "75144193": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 436", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 186" + ], + "75151643": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 302" + ], + "751521": [ + "Section 500" + ], + "75171987": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107" + ], + "75176535": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 147" + ], + "75195375": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 438" + ], + "75197075": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 447", + "Section 34", + "Section 427", + "Section 326" + ], + "75243301": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 120B", + "Section 302", + "Section 120" + ], + "75243661": [ + "Section 173", + "Section 307", + "Section 109", + "Section 34", + "Section 156", + "Section 417" + ], + "75246882": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 324" + ], + "752705": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 326" + ], + "7486680": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "75102153": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 161" + ], + "75316557": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 354", + "Section 323" + ], + "75433798": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 406", + "Section 438", + "Section 156" + ], + "75462033": [ + "Section 384", + "Section 120B" + ], + "75507629": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 147" + ], + "755080": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 120B", + "Section 147" + ], + "75528376": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 308" + ], + "7553449": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 304" + ], + "756216": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "7565481": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 366A" + ], + "75991522": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 379" + ], + "758500": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 323", + "Section 148", + "Section 34", + "Section 147", + "Section 307", + "Section 304", + "Section 436", + "Section 395", + "Section 324" + ], + "75881931": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 376" + ], + "7589288": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 34", + "Section 409" + ], + "76228242": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 419", + "Section 467" + ], + "761884": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 190", + "Section 5", + "Section 511" + ], + "761940": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 34", + "Section 406", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 467" + ], + "761965": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 366", + "Section 156", + "Section 417" + ], + "76249589": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 326", + "Section 448", + "Section 34", + "Section 511" + ], + "76298025": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 354" + ], + "76675357": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 509", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "76719555": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 471" + ], + "767201": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 149" + ], + "76725151": [ + "Section 500" + ], + "766841": [ + "Section 494" + ], + "766895": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "766899": [ + "Section 107", + "Section 161", + "Section 148", + "Section 149" + ], + "76258861": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 511", + "Section 375" + ], + "76278": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 342" + ], + "762858": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "7628989": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 325", + "Section 326", + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 302" + ], + "76894257": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 511" + ], + "7642012": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 294", + "Section 332" + ], + "76425939": [ + "Section 332", + "Section 147" + ], + "76907489": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 392", + "Section 411" + ], + "76910988": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 437", + "Section 120B", + "Section 342", + "Section 394", + "Section 498A", + "Section 411", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 354", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 366", + "Section 392", + "Section 149" + ], + "76911872": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 3", + "Section 148" + ], + "76750196": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 120B" + ], + "767688": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 109", + "Section 120B", + "Section 395", + "Section 114" + ], + "76773591": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 336" + ], + "76817224": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 409", + "Section 13", + "Section 468", + "Section 471" + ], + "768382": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "768514": [ + "Section 365", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 353" + ], + "76863855": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 193", + "Section 420" + ], + "7687262": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "76875237": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 147", + "Section 149" + ], + "77147501": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "771756": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 457" + ], + "77070212": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "77078634": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 300" + ], + "77078902": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "770800": [ + "Section 395" + ], + "77088411": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "77089241": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "77091133": [ + "Section 143", + "Section 2" + ], + "771061": [ + "Section 498A" + ], + "77235041": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 325" + ], + "7723890": [ + "Section 13" + ], + "77245326": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 394", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 397" + ], + "77190154": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 447", + "Section 325" + ], + "77191970": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 188", + "Section 149", + "Section 186" + ], + "771948": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 156", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 452", + "Section 323" + ], + "77198652": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "77215353": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 354", + "Section 341" + ], + "77217688": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 120B", + "Section 511", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 420" + ], + "77274803": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 465", + "Section 366", + "Section 467" + ], + "77294002": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 438", + "Section 467" + ], + "77308510": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 324", + "Section 34", + "Section 511", + "Section 509", + "Section 376", + "Section 149" + ], + "77309948": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "773190": [ + "Section 13" + ], + "77325701": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "77402163": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 201", + "Section 120B", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 506", + "Section 504" + ], + "77415404": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 34", + "Section 482" + ], + "77425446": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 366" + ], + "77621": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 376", + "Section 511" + ], + "77147463": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 427" + ], + "77289770": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 417", + "Section 376" + ], + "777501": [ + "Section 409" + ], + "83879597": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 338", + "Section 304A", + "Section 279" + ], + "7762970": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "77644944": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 147", + "Section 452" + ], + "77686179": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 341", + "Section 302", + "Section 506", + "Section 304" + ], + "7769": [ + "Section 500" + ], + "7769702": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "77698745": [ + "Section 300" + ], + "77722338": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 468" + ], + "77757985": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 498A" + ], + "77764393": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 294" + ], + "77765531": [ + "Section 417", + "Section 376" + ], + "77771496": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "77775063": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 353", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "777773": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 471" + ], + "77778974": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 34", + "Section 394" + ], + "78121161": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 332", + "Section 323", + "Section 324" + ], + "727569": [ + "Section 228", + "Section 193" + ], + "72765": [ + "Section 304B" + ], + "72780373": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 294", + "Section 307" + ], + "72784756": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 120B", + "Section 109", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 143", + "Section 4" + ], + "80348823": [ + "Section 336", + "Section 450", + "Section 294", + "Section 452" + ], + "80369167": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366A", + "Section 120B" + ], + "8323293": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 324" + ], + "83241675": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 375", + "Section 366", + "Section 109", + "Section 366A" + ], + "83246289": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "83251058": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 379" + ], + "83253567": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 506", + "Section 498" + ], + "8326383": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "966820": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 147" + ], + "96687253": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 120B", + "Section 394", + "Section 392" + ], + "96690690": [ + "Section 186", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 324", + "Section 332", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 427" + ], + "96695430": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 302" + ], + "77838139": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 341", + "Section 504", + "Section 448", + "Section 354", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 427", + "Section 326" + ], + "7784102": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 326", + "Section 506" + ], + "77845183": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 394" + ], + "77880580": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A" + ], + "778823": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 107", + "Section 304B" + ], + "78510757": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 320", + "Section 482" + ], + "78523396": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 299", + "Section 323", + "Section 326", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B" + ], + "78542363": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 506", + "Section 498A", + "Section 397" + ], + "78549993": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 325" + ], + "7831680": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 120B" + ], + "78328575": [ + "Section 186", + "Section 332", + "Section 353", + "Section 325" + ], + "783368": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302" + ], + "783492": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "78354376": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 409", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 465", + "Section 419", + "Section 107", + "Section 406", + "Section 468", + "Section 3", + "Section 417" + ], + "78151744": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 511", + "Section 173", + "Section 504", + "Section 313", + "Section 506", + "Section 324" + ], + "781568": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 366", + "Section 114" + ], + "782149": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 201", + "Section 323", + "Section 302" + ], + "78223400": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 302", + "Section 506" + ], + "78230497": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 299", + "Section 307" + ], + "78236571": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "782471": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "78482413": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 415" + ], + "78483293": [ + "Section 447", + "Section 120B", + "Section 448", + "Section 504", + "Section 156" + ], + "78490496": [ + "Section 279", + "Section 337" + ], + "784928": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 467" + ], + "78498172": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 354" + ], + "785041": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 365", + "Section 384", + "Section 342", + "Section 323", + "Section 186", + "Section 302" + ], + "785705": [ + "Section 149" + ], + "785820": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 325", + "Section 326" + ], + "78587697": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "7801223": [ + "Section 375", + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 120B" + ], + "780517": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 114" + ], + "79054506": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 161", + "Section 366", + "Section 164", + "Section 342", + "Section 306" + ], + "790765": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 313", + "Section 506", + "Section 389", + "Section 498", + "Section 417", + "Section 406" + ], + "78844212": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 366", + "Section 363" + ], + "78856435": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 299", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 304" + ], + "788842": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 13", + "Section 468" + ], + "78983411": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 143", + "Section 147", + "Section 325" + ], + "78950184": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420" + ], + "7896526": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 448" + ], + "7897509": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "79091430": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 308", + "Section 34" + ], + "79093897": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 341", + "Section 323" + ], + "79094854": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 279" + ], + "791064": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "79106425": [ + "Section 365", + "Section 342", + "Section 437" + ], + "79191451": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 380", + "Section 120" + ], + "79223015": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "79227480": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 294" + ], + "79249036": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 354", + "Section 506", + "Section 186", + "Section 427", + "Section 326", + "Section 332" + ], + "79127794": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482" + ], + "791358": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "791429": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 304" + ], + "791725": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "79554495": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 420", + "Section 13", + "Section 468", + "Section 482", + "Section 120B", + "Section 409" + ], + "79572512": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 34" + ], + "79577238": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 376", + "Section 457", + "Section 201", + "Section 380", + "Section 363" + ], + "793296": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 302" + ], + "79332409": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "79334985": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "79342968": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "7934935": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 394", + "Section 411", + "Section 201" + ], + "79355720": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 323" + ], + "79357259": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 300" + ], + "79440514": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 394" + ], + "79489944": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 34" + ], + "795015": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "79507095": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 5", + "Section 120B" + ], + "7950933": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 448", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "79550430": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 34" + ], + "79605972": [ + "Section 186", + "Section 447", + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 506", + "Section 438" + ], + "79622831": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 294", + "Section 332" + ], + "79632001": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 509" + ], + "79633217": [ + "Section 417", + "Section 498" + ], + "796355": [ + "Section 482" + ], + "796356": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "79580953": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 188" + ], + "79975933": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 306" + ], + "79982813": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 2", + "Section 107", + "Section 161" + ], + "7998359": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 149", + "Section 147" + ], + "79983658": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 307", + "Section 427", + "Section 147", + "Section 324", + "Section 326" + ], + "79736029": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 395", + "Section 436", + "Section 174A", + "Section 324", + "Section 229A" + ], + "797390": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 147" + ], + "79740041": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 34", + "Section 506" + ], + "797766": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467", + "Section 156", + "Section 468" + ], + "79838528": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 376" + ], + "79922688": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B" + ], + "79924455": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 411", + "Section 394" + ], + "79928086": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "79932": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 353" + ], + "79947782": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 294", + "Section 325" + ], + "7996681": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 392", + "Section 452", + "Section 504", + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 409", + "Section 448" + ], + "802239": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "80238725": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376" + ], + "802505": [ + "Section 395", + "Section 397", + "Section 427", + "Section 452", + "Section 3" + ], + "801090": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "80117893": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 326", + "Section 307" + ], + "80120": [ + "Section 419", + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 409", + "Section 417" + ], + "80120431": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 326" + ], + "8013376": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 438" + ], + "801478": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 143", + "Section 148" + ], + "80371477": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 324", + "Section 320", + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 3", + "Section 397" + ], + "80390078": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 511" + ], + "80398365": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 294" + ], + "80419393": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 376", + "Section 304", + "Section 304A", + "Section 109" + ], + "805706": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 498A", + "Section 307" + ], + "80467804": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 149", + "Section 452", + "Section 302" + ], + "804908": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 494", + "Section 306" + ], + "80524934": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "80543683": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 34" + ], + "80986295": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 188", + "Section 438", + "Section 34" + ], + "809893": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 313", + "Section 147", + "Section 326" + ], + "809150": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 313" + ], + "80924": [ + "Section 494" + ], + "80839343": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 379" + ], + "808466": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 147", + "Section 448", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 427" + ], + "8085035": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 447", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "808668": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 294", + "Section 506", + "Section 465", + "Section 468" + ], + "808788": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 307" + ], + "80880958": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "80945081": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "80952457": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "8095427": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120", + "Section 201" + ], + "809586": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "80964802": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "811577": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 379", + "Section 161" + ], + "8117642": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323" + ], + "8073242": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 324" + ], + "80748514": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 337" + ], + "807525": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 302" + ], + "807583": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 299", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 506", + "Section 114" + ], + "80760852": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "810914": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 304" + ], + "81242627": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 341", + "Section 342", + "Section 294", + "Section 324", + "Section 326", + "Section 506" + ], + "81252169": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 419", + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "81618143": [ + "Section 498A" + ], + "8165": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 120B" + ], + "816615": [ + "Section 2", + "Section 465", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 120B" + ], + "816657": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 320" + ], + "81675498": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "816873": [ + "Section 279", + "Section 304A", + "Section 304" + ], + "81492359": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 323" + ], + "81522318": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 354", + "Section 307", + "Section 448", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "89821": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "89828025": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 384", + "Section 363", + "Section 506", + "Section 450", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "8983331": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "896908": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 506" + ], + "896930": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302" + ], + "89698807": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 304B", + "Section 304" + ], + "89698985": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 406" + ], + "89707545": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 419", + "Section 427", + "Section 338", + "Section 337", + "Section 279" + ], + "89720818": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 452" + ], + "89640482": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 107", + "Section 34", + "Section 304", + "Section 304B" + ], + "89654832": [ + "Section 164", + "Section 438", + "Section 448", + "Section 376", + "Section 34", + "Section 511" + ], + "89657224": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 452", + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "89659311": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 306", + "Section 304B" + ], + "89678925": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 506", + "Section 304", + "Section 299" + ], + "81572884": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 341", + "Section 506" + ], + "817386": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 307" + ], + "82077741": [ + "Section 365", + "Section 364", + "Section 506", + "Section 363" + ], + "8218": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 114", + "Section 326", + "Section 107", + "Section 323" + ], + "82381535": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 324", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "81596232": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 336", + "Section 294" + ], + "81605451": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467" + ], + "81609": [ + "Section 409" + ], + "81808957": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 506", + "Section 338" + ], + "81815167": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 482", + "Section 409", + "Section 34", + "Section 120B" + ], + "81896153": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420" + ], + "81875198": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 323" + ], + "81882354": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 323" + ], + "83006852": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 353", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "830110": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 302" + ], + "830205": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "81931264": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 500", + "Section 506" + ], + "81938475": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 120B" + ], + "81939276": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 397", + "Section 323", + "Section 341" + ], + "8196441": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 294" + ], + "820403": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 34" + ], + "82063985": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "821863": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 304", + "Section 299" + ], + "82191545": [ + "Section 229A" + ], + "82200866": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "82204": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 304" + ], + "82583057": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 363", + "Section 320" + ], + "825974": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 506" + ], + "82258645": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 306", + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 120", + "Section 156" + ], + "82260728": [ + "Section 450", + "Section 342" + ], + "82294797": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 342", + "Section 341" + ], + "82306168": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 156", + "Section 34" + ], + "82445269": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 452", + "Section 323", + "Section 148" + ], + "824033": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "82404133": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 34" + ], + "82424471": [ + "Section 313", + "Section 498A", + "Section 379", + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 511" + ], + "82632": [ + "Section 2", + "Section 325", + "Section 506", + "Section 342", + "Section 468" + ], + "826569": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120", + "Section 120B" + ], + "826580": [ + "Section 380" + ], + "82686": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 109" + ], + "826865": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120B" + ], + "82758324": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 465", + "Section 120B", + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 482", + "Section 409", + "Section 468", + "Section 34" + ], + "82770918": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 302" + ], + "82847881": [ + "Section 509", + "Section 506", + "Section 500", + "Section 354" + ], + "829150": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 457", + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 380", + "Section 467" + ], + "82915924": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 511", + "Section 504", + "Section 465", + "Section 471", + "Section 406", + "Section 467", + "Section 409", + "Section 468" + ], + "82916993": [ + "Section 2", + "Section 411", + "Section 107", + "Section 364", + "Section 3", + "Section 201", + "Section 397" + ], + "82923092": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 323", + "Section 506" + ], + "82968387": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 34", + "Section 438" + ], + "82975247": [ + "Section 107", + "Section 306" + ], + "82976719": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 341", + "Section 304A", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "829901": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 504", + "Section 307", + "Section 336", + "Section 332", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 308", + "Section 149" + ], + "83044980": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "833642": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 161", + "Section 326", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 342", + "Section 34" + ], + "834851": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 468" + ], + "836496": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 394", + "Section 392", + "Section 313" + ], + "83832059": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 500", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "83109559": [ + "Section 511", + "Section 4", + "Section 306", + "Section 228" + ], + "831184": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 307", + "Section 411" + ], + "8317656": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 294" + ], + "83202220": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 307", + "Section 353", + "Section 326" + ], + "832125": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 307", + "Section 164", + "Section 120" + ], + "832220": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "832769": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 304B" + ], + "832862": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "833084": [ + "Section 397" + ], + "83309129": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 395" + ], + "833093": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "83315076": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 120B", + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "83319153": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 341", + "Section 471" + ], + "83337784": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 34", + "Section 392", + "Section 397" + ], + "833494": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "83353298": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "83488887": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406" + ], + "835077": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 468", + "Section 467" + ], + "83511525": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 307", + "Section 341", + "Section 302", + "Section 147" + ], + "835200": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 326" + ], + "83411565": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "83413264": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 498" + ], + "83455393": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 438" + ], + "83468567": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 366" + ], + "83618816": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "83637880": [ + "Section 366A", + "Section 109", + "Section 376" + ], + "836484": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "83539668": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "83557097": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "83557492": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "83571022": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 448", + "Section 376", + "Section 323", + "Section 354", + "Section 511" + ], + "83572177": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 34" + ], + "83576909": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294" + ], + "835900": [ + "Section 201" + ], + "836113": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "83661865": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 323" + ], + "836678": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 109", + "Section 120B", + "Section 107", + "Section 417" + ], + "83691959": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "83695948": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 149", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 457", + "Section 307", + "Section 395", + "Section 397", + "Section 34" + ], + "83702661": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294", + "Section 34" + ], + "837049": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 109", + "Section 332", + "Section 506" + ], + "83714243": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 366" + ], + "83716034": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 143", + "Section 307", + "Section 504", + "Section 324" + ], + "837174": [ + "Section 395", + "Section 397" + ], + "84374299": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 365", + "Section 353", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 420" + ], + "843923": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 415" + ], + "843926": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 149", + "Section 304", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 326" + ], + "84396029": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 397", + "Section 392", + "Section 380", + "Section 506", + "Section 342", + "Section 34" + ], + "83783804": [ + "Section 457", + "Section 511" + ], + "83786420": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 307", + "Section 406", + "Section 498A", + "Section 465", + "Section 471", + "Section 193", + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 342", + "Section 498" + ], + "83790087": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 427", + "Section 307", + "Section 325", + "Section 332", + "Section 353", + "Section 186", + "Section 341", + "Section 143" + ], + "83841786": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "838466": [ + "Section 155", + "Section 420", + "Section 482", + "Section 161", + "Section 156", + "Section 409" + ], + "838507": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 342", + "Section 34" + ], + "83863086": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 306", + "Section 438" + ], + "83870188": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 395", + "Section 307", + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 354", + "Section 326", + "Section 147", + "Section 143", + "Section 324", + "Section 452", + "Section 427" + ], + "840919": [ + "Section 380" + ], + "84047870": [ + "Section 457", + "Section 411", + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A", + "Section 380" + ], + "84049514": [ + "Section 2", + "Section 506", + "Section 353", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "84062581": [ + "Section 313", + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "84066113": [ + "Section 457", + "Section 376" + ], + "839855": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 324", + "Section 300" + ], + "83985643": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 304" + ], + "8399251": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307" + ], + "839932": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 302" + ], + "839968": [ + "Section 2", + "Section 384", + "Section 34", + "Section 366" + ], + "840104": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "84472254": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 34" + ], + "844758": [ + "Section 417", + "Section 302", + "Section 498A", + "Section 447", + "Section 376", + "Section 323", + "Section 304B", + "Section 375" + ], + "844995": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "84515964": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 5", + "Section 376", + "Section 504", + "Section 164", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "84167888": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 379", + "Section 411" + ], + "841742": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 376", + "Section 323" + ], + "84667462": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 325" + ], + "846469": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B" + ], + "846499": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 173", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 341", + "Section 427" + ], + "84651568": [ + "Section 419", + "Section 506", + "Section 120", + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 471", + "Section 468" + ], + "84704995": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 438", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "84710303": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 120", + "Section 397" + ], + "84719861": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 323", + "Section 294", + "Section 341" + ], + "847199": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 326", + "Section 149" + ], + "84727431": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 376" + ], + "84741989": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "84909334": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 448" + ], + "8531180": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 448", + "Section 376", + "Section 511" + ], + "855382": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 302", + "Section 279" + ], + "85544473": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "855583": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 326" + ], + "858257": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 299", + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 120B" + ], + "858350": [ + "Section 482" + ], + "8585444": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 164", + "Section 190", + "Section 156", + "Section 161", + "Section 2", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467", + "Section 409", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 201", + "Section 438" + ], + "86130630": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 341", + "Section 353", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "86145816": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 34" + ], + "86150": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 149" + ], + "861510": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 304", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 228", + "Section 326" + ], + "86151859": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 320", + "Section 482" + ], + "847927": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 5" + ], + "84799620": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 201" + ], + "86469183": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 342", + "Section 376", + "Section 156" + ], + "84862786": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 354" + ], + "84878164": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 394" + ], + "84880634": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 354", + "Section 120B", + "Section 392", + "Section 120" + ], + "84995879": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420" + ], + "85021211": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 353", + "Section 307" + ], + "85063133": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 294", + "Section 149", + "Section 186" + ], + "85075348": [ + "Section 511", + "Section 302", + "Section 376", + "Section 394", + "Section 411" + ], + "85077620": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "850801": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 304", + "Section 148" + ], + "8508645": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "85200254": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 323" + ], + "852140": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 326", + "Section 34", + "Section 120B", + "Section 149", + "Section 114" + ], + "85224444": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "85236486": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 34", + "Section 417" + ], + "85269557": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 120B", + "Section 438", + "Section 420" + ], + "85277336": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 395" + ], + "85389729": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 447", + "Section 307", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 308", + "Section 324", + "Section 313", + "Section 304", + "Section 379", + "Section 34" + ], + "85402742": [ + "Section 306" + ], + "85405236": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 376", + "Section 438" + ], + "85572": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 366", + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 294", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "85597346": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 323", + "Section 326", + "Section 452", + "Section 148", + "Section 294", + "Section 325", + "Section 147" + ], + "854591": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "85463128": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 354", + "Section 341" + ], + "854674": [ + "Section 494", + "Section 498A" + ], + "854931": [ + "Section 366A", + "Section 376", + "Section 375", + "Section 506", + "Section 366", + "Section 363" + ], + "855018": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 482", + "Section 155", + "Section 415", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 156" + ], + "85508109": [ + "Section 173" + ], + "855213": [ + "Section 364", + "Section 302" + ], + "856425": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 313" + ], + "856428": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 4" + ], + "85695": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 324" + ], + "85708026": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 302", + "Section 325", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 109" + ], + "8568164": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 307", + "Section 148" + ], + "860302290": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 300" + ], + "861058": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 320" + ], + "8615253": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 504", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "858099": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 302", + "Section 148" + ], + "858161": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "85820839": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 313", + "Section 482", + "Section 468", + "Section 467" + ], + "85863409": [ + "Section 452" + ], + "858822": [ + "Section 409" + ], + "85897186": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "85903218": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 107" + ], + "86165240": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "861688": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 307", + "Section 326", + "Section 465", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 337", + "Section 411", + "Section 148", + "Section 3" + ], + "86183832": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 448", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "86204236": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 438" + ], + "86403166": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 427", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 336", + "Section 323", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 379", + "Section 341", + "Section 120B", + "Section 364", + "Section 436" + ], + "86406029": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 341" + ], + "864250": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "864356": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 326", + "Section 161" + ], + "86443486": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 120", + "Section 482" + ], + "864437": [ + "Section 500", + "Section 120B" + ], + "86447668": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "86449554": [ + "Section 363" + ], + "86513397": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 395", + "Section 397", + "Section 304" + ], + "86515968": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "86522363": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 365", + "Section 392", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 109" + ], + "86661615": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 341", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 342", + "Section 427", + "Section 149" + ], + "866681": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 304" + ], + "86678494": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "86568214": [ + "Section 436", + "Section 448", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "86574129": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "86579163": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "865812": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "87142784": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 366", + "Section 506", + "Section 417", + "Section 114" + ], + "87146241": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 448", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "87156081": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306" + ], + "882689": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506" + ], + "884016": [ + "Section 161" + ], + "88430592": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 34" + ], + "88546169": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 120", + "Section 307", + "Section 302" + ], + "88692165": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 427", + "Section 506" + ], + "87219438": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 2", + "Section 376", + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 294" + ], + "872371": [ + "Section 173", + "Section 380", + "Section 156", + "Section 457", + "Section 190", + "Section 411", + "Section 155" + ], + "87244648": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 304A" + ], + "86584432": [ + "Section 509", + "Section 504" + ], + "866148": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 120" + ], + "8663340": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 307", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "866427": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 114", + "Section 149" + ], + "866480": [ + "Section 494" + ], + "862694": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471" + ], + "862701": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 149", + "Section 120B", + "Section 482", + "Section 173", + "Section 302" + ], + "86964423": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A" + ], + "86989309": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 406" + ], + "866848": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 299", + "Section 304" + ], + "86691685": [ + "Section 304B" + ], + "86703507": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 379", + "Section 482", + "Section 420" + ], + "86705854": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "86713227": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 114" + ], + "86719473": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 294" + ], + "868430": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 300", + "Section 448" + ], + "86846368": [ + "Section 13" + ], + "86846731": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "86859323": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 313", + "Section 34" + ], + "86864": [ + "Section 415", + "Section 406", + "Section 34" + ], + "86870576": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "869066": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 304", + "Section 504", + "Section 326", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 336", + "Section 325", + "Section 156" + ], + "869137": [ + "Section 173", + "Section 498A", + "Section 2", + "Section 304B", + "Section 482" + ], + "86920279": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 376", + "Section 342" + ], + "86997196": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 506", + "Section 415" + ], + "87001104": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 506" + ], + "8700509": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 4", + "Section 302" + ], + "87025062": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 34", + "Section 504" + ], + "87039380": [ + "Section 389" + ], + "870395": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 304", + "Section 498A" + ], + "87040278": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 354", + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 452", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "87043181": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "870545": [ + "Section 457", + "Section 323", + "Section 148", + "Section 324" + ], + "87095261": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 452", + "Section 392" + ], + "871035": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 379", + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 34", + "Section 147", + "Section 300", + "Section 109", + "Section 148" + ], + "871668": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "871687": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 397", + "Section 511" + ], + "8717328": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 149", + "Section 308", + "Section 320", + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "8718065": [ + "Section 452" + ], + "87189987": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294" + ], + "87190052": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "8719285": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "87196479": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 342" + ], + "87199434": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 376", + "Section 120", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 420", + "Section 406" + ], + "87211166": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 109", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "87295117": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 342", + "Section 326" + ], + "873096": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 326", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 307", + "Section 342", + "Section 448", + "Section 354", + "Section 304" + ], + "873417": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34" + ], + "87442972": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 304", + "Section 338", + "Section 337" + ], + "87471054": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 506", + "Section 294" + ], + "87476508": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 437", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "87500435": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 506", + "Section 437" + ], + "87514792": [ + "Section 156", + "Section 34" + ], + "875180": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "875399": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 325", + "Section 302" + ], + "87540784": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 427" + ], + "87544009": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 409" + ], + "87545401": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 375" + ], + "88979382": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 120B", + "Section 148", + "Section 332", + "Section 302", + "Section 147" + ], + "88983199": [ + "Section 511", + "Section 376", + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "88999109": [ + "Section 186", + "Section 353" + ], + "8921920": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 188", + "Section 147" + ], + "89221402": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 406" + ], + "89235681": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 364" + ], + "88139078": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "88154901": [ + "Section 366A", + "Section 506", + "Section 366" + ], + "881625": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "88170575": [ + "Section 107", + "Section 306" + ], + "88172510": [ + "Section 419", + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 467" + ], + "88175136": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 365", + "Section 34" + ], + "87670143": [ + "Section 228", + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 120B", + "Section 420" + ], + "876866": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 498A", + "Section 161", + "Section 306" + ], + "87689995": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "87705010": [ + "Section 375", + "Section 376", + "Section 5", + "Section 354", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "87705093": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 457", + "Section 438" + ], + "888102": [ + "Section 365", + "Section 376", + "Section 363" + ], + "88812351": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 304" + ], + "88812352": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 468" + ], + "888154": [ + "Section 164" + ], + "88818807": [ + "Section 511", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 363", + "Section 323", + "Section 354" + ], + "88821611": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 365", + "Section 420", + "Section 201", + "Section 364", + "Section 419", + "Section 406", + "Section 3" + ], + "888252": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 417", + "Section 323", + "Section 447", + "Section 120B" + ], + "8882738": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 427", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 332", + "Section 307", + "Section 353", + "Section 302", + "Section 147" + ], + "78723012": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 307" + ], + "78732952": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "78734": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 173", + "Section 419" + ], + "93072220": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A", + "Section 323" + ], + "87794861": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 323" + ], + "87279591": [ + "Section 509", + "Section 354" + ], + "87723679": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 506" + ], + "8786700": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 304", + "Section 307" + ], + "87806978": [ + "Section 389" + ], + "87811657": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 504", + "Section 326", + "Section 325", + "Section 394" + ], + "878138": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 419", + "Section 420", + "Section 465", + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 173", + "Section 4" + ], + "8781771": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 34", + "Section 306" + ], + "87827374": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 324", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 397", + "Section 323", + "Section 325" + ], + "879842": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 34" + ], + "87994168": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 498", + "Section 506" + ], + "87994568": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 294" + ], + "880147": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 304" + ], + "880246": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 148" + ], + "88183419": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 465", + "Section 471" + ], + "8818431": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 341", + "Section 326", + "Section 325", + "Section 324" + ], + "8820342": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 34", + "Section 498" + ], + "88205640": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 406" + ], + "88270302": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 336", + "Section 384", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 427" + ], + "882761": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506" + ], + "882913": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 34" + ], + "8823302": [ + "Section 173", + "Section 193", + "Section 364", + "Section 174A", + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "88251298": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 336", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 147" + ], + "88254885": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 34" + ], + "883482": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 302", + "Section 353", + "Section 465", + "Section 376", + "Section 147" + ], + "8835981": [ + "Section 337", + "Section 279", + "Section 161" + ], + "88368294": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 299", + "Section 149" + ], + "88376796": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 294" + ], + "88384218": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 341" + ], + "88396430": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "88434857": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 34", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 468" + ], + "88438": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 120B", + "Section 376" + ], + "88514390": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 406" + ], + "88515813": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "88540709": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 120", + "Section 148", + "Section 506" + ], + "885468": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 326" + ], + "88580418": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 34", + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 186" + ], + "88581": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 375", + "Section 354", + "Section 511" + ], + "8859666": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34" + ], + "88744": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 304", + "Section 299" + ], + "886925": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302" + ], + "88702549": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 420", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 447", + "Section 354", + "Section 147" + ], + "89022688": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "890234": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 302" + ], + "8907383": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "890880": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 417", + "Section 376", + "Section 366A", + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 375", + "Section 306" + ], + "8880": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 323", + "Section 148", + "Section 324", + "Section 326", + "Section 147" + ], + "888052": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 109", + "Section 342" + ], + "888518": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "888809": [ + "Section 201" + ], + "88890526": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120" + ], + "89284165": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 376" + ], + "889775": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 411", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 109" + ], + "89265767": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 323", + "Section 494", + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 504" + ], + "892697": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 511", + "Section 5", + "Section 438" + ], + "89277670": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 4", + "Section 324", + "Section 354" + ], + "89164534": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 323" + ], + "89177946": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "891962": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 279", + "Section 337", + "Section 338" + ], + "892078": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 341", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 326", + "Section 147", + "Section 149" + ], + "892876": [ + "Section 306" + ], + "892979": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 323" + ], + "89303986": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 498" + ], + "89312507": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 307", + "Section 438" + ], + "89320087": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 323", + "Section 294", + "Section 34", + "Section 438" + ], + "893279": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 482", + "Section 380", + "Section 409", + "Section 457", + "Section 13", + "Section 120", + "Section 120B", + "Section 379" + ], + "893334": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 325" + ], + "893353": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 149", + "Section 323", + "Section 147" + ], + "89344715": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 452" + ], + "8939": [ + "Section 409" + ], + "89393704": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "89394623": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 427" + ], + "89412006": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "89419486": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 506" + ], + "89422351": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307" + ], + "894272": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "89544": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 34" + ], + "895476": [ + "Section 304A" + ], + "89467100": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 323", + "Section 148", + "Section 143", + "Section 504", + "Section 302", + "Section 147" + ], + "89479382": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 304A", + "Section 279" + ], + "89493224": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 427", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 188", + "Section 332", + "Section 353", + "Section 147" + ], + "89495941": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 506", + "Section 4" + ], + "89497816": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 395" + ], + "89535248": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 148" + ], + "89562422": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B" + ], + "89564": [ + "Section 465", + "Section 471" + ], + "895833": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 306" + ], + "895866": [ + "Section 500", + "Section 193" + ], + "89605198": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 190" + ], + "90035995": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 294", + "Section 452", + "Section 325", + "Section 34", + "Section 323" + ], + "900435": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 379" + ], + "900221": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 120B", + "Section 471", + "Section 5" + ], + "90024071": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294", + "Section 34", + "Section 506" + ], + "89737990": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 307", + "Section 452", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 320", + "Section 34" + ], + "897478": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "89765564": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 341", + "Section 379", + "Section 325" + ], + "90184175": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 427", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 3" + ], + "90185445": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 506", + "Section 448", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 34" + ], + "90187847": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 354" + ], + "901970": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 376" + ], + "897735": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 411", + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 471" + ], + "89800889": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A" + ], + "89805978": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 143", + "Section 341", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "89842296": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 326", + "Section 148", + "Section 324", + "Section 143", + "Section 147" + ], + "89843895": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 120B" + ], + "898639": [ + "Section 107", + "Section 120B" + ], + "89892125": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 34", + "Section 468", + "Section 420" + ], + "89914544": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 34" + ], + "89960635": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 354", + "Section 509" + ], + "90002905": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323" + ], + "900096": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "90251163": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420" + ], + "902517": [ + "Section 417", + "Section 438" + ], + "90217031": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 34" + ], + "90221342": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 364", + "Section 201", + "Section 34" + ], + "9022146": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "90223515": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "90223855": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 201", + "Section 363", + "Section 302", + "Section 384" + ], + "90231855": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 354", + "Section 326", + "Section 325", + "Section 143" + ], + "90241096": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 323", + "Section 341", + "Section 3", + "Section 506", + "Section 324" + ], + "90273570": [ + "Section 509", + "Section 506", + "Section 354" + ], + "9030216": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "905055": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 3", + "Section 228" + ], + "90513889": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 342", + "Section 313" + ], + "90526760": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A" + ], + "90396562": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 380", + "Section 457" + ], + "90397781": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 504", + "Section 147", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 143", + "Section 307" + ], + "90404": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 324" + ], + "904162": [ + "Section 313" + ], + "90433102": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 498A", + "Section 307", + "Section 34" + ], + "904939": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 34" + ], + "91118874": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 452", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 120B", + "Section 323", + "Section 320", + "Section 504", + "Section 34", + "Section 109" + ], + "91124163": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 363" + ], + "91128923": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 299", + "Section 300", + "Section 304" + ], + "91137580": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 376" + ], + "906606": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 332", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 427", + "Section 147", + "Section 341" + ], + "90661915": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "90671517": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 302" + ], + "90675482": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "90679395": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 34" + ], + "90696628": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "90730744": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "90737175": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 188", + "Section 149", + "Section 186" + ], + "907455": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "908002": [ + "Section 5" + ], + "90807004": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 300", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 325", + "Section 147" + ], + "908155": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 313" + ], + "90819464": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 325" + ], + "90826184": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 34" + ], + "90827718": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 379", + "Section 452", + "Section 427", + "Section 504" + ], + "9083809": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 438", + "Section 326" + ], + "90839494": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 304" + ], + "90840490": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 447", + "Section 307", + "Section 379", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "90852010": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 365", + "Section 34", + "Section 427", + "Section 448", + "Section 326" + ], + "9117677": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 143", + "Section 504", + "Section 326", + "Section 300", + "Section 149" + ], + "916384": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 324" + ], + "924168": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 302", + "Section 394", + "Section 397", + "Section 457" + ], + "92423": [ + "Section 494" + ], + "9243830": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 342", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "909372": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 302" + ], + "90943760": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 34" + ], + "909571": [ + "Section 164" + ], + "90902482": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 308", + "Section 506", + "Section 437", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "90920551": [ + "Section 173", + "Section 342", + "Section 120B", + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 193", + "Section 365", + "Section 482", + "Section 114" + ], + "909259": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "90929918": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "90982028": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 34" + ], + "90983772": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 376" + ], + "90988090": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 498A" + ], + "909939": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 34", + "Section 201", + "Section 409" + ], + "90995914": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294", + "Section 34" + ], + "91010006": [ + "Section 375", + "Section 376", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 313", + "Section 509", + "Section 3", + "Section 5", + "Section 164" + ], + "91018303": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 304", + "Section 300" + ], + "910194": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "910435": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 5" + ], + "911883": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 120B", + "Section 114" + ], + "91197868": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 511", + "Section 504" + ], + "91214442": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 304", + "Section 4", + "Section 300" + ], + "91223108": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 482", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 409" + ], + "91230071": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294" + ], + "912433": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 120", + "Section 467" + ], + "91245923": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 452" + ], + "912496": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 415" + ], + "912502": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 320" + ], + "91314056": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 420", + "Section 294" + ], + "91324799": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 504", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 307" + ], + "91325374": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 354", + "Section 341", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "913324": [ + "Section 201" + ], + "91351264": [ + "Section 2", + "Section 320" + ], + "914058": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 406", + "Section 468", + "Section 465", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 437", + "Section 201", + "Section 34", + "Section 409", + "Section 471" + ], + "914230": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 148" + ], + "91430252": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 148" + ], + "920843": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 411", + "Section 109" + ], + "9211252": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506" + ], + "91452542": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 364", + "Section 323" + ], + "91459758": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 394", + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 506", + "Section 341", + "Section 427", + "Section 452", + "Section 365", + "Section 304", + "Section 364", + "Section 147", + "Section 143", + "Section 325", + "Section 395", + "Section 504", + "Section 307", + "Section 509" + ], + "91467019": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 302", + "Section 397", + "Section 34" + ], + "91486444": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "91534452": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 437" + ], + "91534465": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 452", + "Section 436", + "Section 34", + "Section 427", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "91542466": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 411", + "Section 307" + ], + "91791838": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B" + ], + "91805749": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "91681326": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 300", + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 341", + "Section 147" + ], + "916927": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "91697361": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 420", + "Section 406" + ], + "91745154": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 364", + "Section 201", + "Section 365", + "Section 120B", + "Section 376", + "Section 120", + "Section 363" + ], + "92021202": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 506" + ], + "92048966": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B" + ], + "9204923": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 419", + "Section 155", + "Section 415", + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 120B", + "Section 323", + "Section 156", + "Section 468" + ], + "92074932": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 323", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 147", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 143", + "Section 509", + "Section 324" + ], + "9184": [ + "Section 107", + "Section 500", + "Section 34", + "Section 120B", + "Section 482" + ], + "91843175": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 366" + ], + "91845918": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 188", + "Section 420" + ], + "92117008": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "92129140": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 294", + "Section 326", + "Section 307", + "Section 332" + ], + "921305": [ + "Section 365", + "Section 376", + "Section 34", + "Section 392" + ], + "92153153": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 323" + ], + "92156967": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "921572": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 188", + "Section 13", + "Section 420", + "Section 279", + "Section 337", + "Section 338" + ], + "92164749": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 411", + "Section 379", + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 397", + "Section 467", + "Section 114", + "Section 468" + ], + "92166181": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "92174584": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302" + ], + "923566": [ + "Section 164" + ], + "92382661": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 299", + "Section 313", + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 498A" + ], + "9238813": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 506" + ], + "92389265": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 465", + "Section 468" + ], + "923977": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 437" + ], + "92406158": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 120B" + ], + "924078": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 201" + ], + "92448889": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 436", + "Section 3", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 4", + "Section 336", + "Section 332", + "Section 397", + "Section 148", + "Section 395", + "Section 427", + "Section 149" + ], + "926525": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "926588": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "92444277": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 323" + ], + "92747353": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 417" + ], + "927539": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 325", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 304", + "Section 148", + "Section 109", + "Section 147" + ], + "9275619": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 302" + ], + "92475773": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "92477583": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 457", + "Section 450", + "Section 394", + "Section 411" + ], + "92483194": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 468", + "Section 354", + "Section 417", + "Section 324", + "Section 452", + "Section 120B", + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 498A", + "Section 313" + ], + "92500251": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 307", + "Section 308", + "Section 323" + ], + "92506474": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420" + ], + "92513343": [ + "Section 2", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 392" + ], + "92804773": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 448", + "Section 323", + "Section 354", + "Section 379", + "Section 326" + ], + "92830039": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 304", + "Section 302" + ], + "928322": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 120B", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 4", + "Section 467", + "Section 3", + "Section 186" + ], + "92846055": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302" + ], + "92861047": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 438", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "9287225": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 448", + "Section 341" + ], + "92887629": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 324", + "Section 506" + ], + "9309869": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 506" + ], + "93101648": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 155", + "Section 482", + "Section 420", + "Section 415", + "Section 156" + ], + "933628": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 294" + ], + "933772": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 427", + "Section 506", + "Section 147", + "Section 186", + "Section 341" + ], + "933853": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 148", + "Section 342", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 302" + ], + "9324883": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306" + ], + "93211130": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 506" + ], + "95070211": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "92983996": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 190", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 173", + "Section 306", + "Section 200", + "Section 323", + "Section 307", + "Section 34" + ], + "929859": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 379", + "Section 109", + "Section 384", + "Section 114", + "Section 173", + "Section 417" + ], + "929893": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 364" + ], + "93001944": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 394", + "Section 294" + ], + "93005": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 323" + ], + "93457501": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 324" + ], + "9346747": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 506", + "Section 354", + "Section 307", + "Section 186", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "933091": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "93313031": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "93334859": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 34", + "Section 354", + "Section 438" + ], + "9334": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 299", + "Section 302", + "Section 300" + ], + "932828": [ + "Section 120B" + ], + "93287931": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "93415989": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 149", + "Section 452", + "Section 143", + "Section 148" + ], + "93420915": [ + "Section 450", + "Section 307", + "Section 354" + ], + "934266": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 376" + ], + "934289": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 304B", + "Section 313" + ], + "93436383": [ + "Section 338", + "Section 109", + "Section 107" + ], + "93524862": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 448", + "Section 354", + "Section 506" + ], + "93525270": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 307", + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 471", + "Section 482" + ], + "93526105": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "93534129": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 302" + ], + "935429": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "934708": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 364", + "Section 323" + ], + "935496": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 482", + "Section 397" + ], + "9355521": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A" + ], + "93591052": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 504", + "Section 452", + "Section 147", + "Section 325" + ], + "93594735": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "93640566": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 438" + ], + "93673295": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "937318": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 302" + ], + "93768717": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 279", + "Section 337" + ], + "939280": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 34" + ], + "93965089": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 200", + "Section 149" + ], + "93914274": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 498A" + ], + "94181": [ + "Section 161" + ], + "94196100": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "94011548": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "94029": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "940310": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 304", + "Section 299", + "Section 323" + ], + "94088411": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 324" + ], + "94106319": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 302" + ], + "94111457": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 13", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 201" + ], + "9430061": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 506" + ], + "943114": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 366", + "Section 452" + ], + "94318874": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 302" + ], + "93685": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 34" + ], + "9396756": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 427", + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 509", + "Section 294", + "Section 376" + ], + "951114": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 397", + "Section 452" + ], + "95130723": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 323" + ], + "95364193": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 307", + "Section 332", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 506", + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 148", + "Section 186" + ], + "95369212": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "95372069": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "95386510": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 34", + "Section 120B", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 452" + ], + "95389405": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 120B", + "Section 302", + "Section 364", + "Section 365", + "Section 201", + "Section 107", + "Section 419", + "Section 34" + ], + "95622198": [ + "Section 114", + "Section 406", + "Section 506", + "Section 326", + "Section 498A" + ], + "95626863": [ + "Section 324" + ], + "94216500": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 120B", + "Section 468", + "Section 34", + "Section 417", + "Section 420", + "Section 419", + "Section 406" + ], + "942240": [ + "Section 389", + "Section 34", + "Section 109", + "Section 482" + ], + "94249650": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 5" + ], + "942570": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 465", + "Section 34" + ], + "94268458": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 504", + "Section 323" + ], + "94274821": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 148", + "Section 229A", + "Section 307", + "Section 174A", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 149", + "Section 332" + ], + "94277808": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "94283062": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 354", + "Section 448" + ], + "943395": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "94347507": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 307", + "Section 342", + "Section 325", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "9434820": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 325", + "Section 506" + ], + "94349014": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 3", + "Section 506" + ], + "94356808": [ + "Section 511", + "Section 506" + ], + "943734": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "9437849": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 448", + "Section 302", + "Section 379", + "Section 120B" + ], + "944344": [ + "Section 494", + "Section 511", + "Section 109", + "Section 34", + "Section 200", + "Section 161", + "Section 308", + "Section 307" + ], + "94469128": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 342" + ], + "945623": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 366" + ], + "9458879": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 155" + ], + "945224": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 354" + ], + "94525342": [ + "Section 436", + "Section 332", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 353", + "Section 147" + ], + "9454309": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 498A", + "Section 323", + "Section 427" + ], + "94774243": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 482", + "Section 342", + "Section 320" + ], + "94774374": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "9477444": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 336" + ], + "94779330": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "94791162": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 482" + ], + "94797195": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "94811334": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 498A" + ], + "94814701": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "94818616": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 325", + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 332", + "Section 148", + "Section 186" + ], + "94836352": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "94840625": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 294" + ], + "9487189": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 438", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 34", + "Section 341" + ], + "948886": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A", + "Section 190", + "Section 482", + "Section 302", + "Section 438", + "Section 173" + ], + "9489017": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "9513811": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 304", + "Section 337", + "Section 338", + "Section 307" + ], + "951711": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "95178951": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 409", + "Section 420" + ], + "9518347": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 304", + "Section 299", + "Section 34" + ], + "95185143": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A" + ], + "95185253": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 436", + "Section 147", + "Section 427" + ], + "9519555": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "95200150": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 326", + "Section 427", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 324", + "Section 504", + "Section 143", + "Section 147" + ], + "952022": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 468", + "Section 109", + "Section 5", + "Section 467" + ], + "95256947": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 342" + ], + "95264538": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 188" + ], + "959014": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 306" + ], + "95904515": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 34", + "Section 186" + ], + "95910971": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 34", + "Section 420" + ], + "953117": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B" + ], + "95314652": [ + "Section 375", + "Section 323", + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 173", + "Section 379", + "Section 366", + "Section 34" + ], + "95326876": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 447", + "Section 109", + "Section 325" + ], + "953390": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 326", + "Section 324", + "Section 294", + "Section 148" + ], + "95408485": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 365", + "Section 354", + "Section 509", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "954250": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 161", + "Section 304", + "Section 307" + ], + "95429912": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 34" + ], + "95433188": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 34" + ], + "954356": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 313", + "Section 304" + ], + "95444690": [ + "Section 279", + "Section 304A", + "Section 397" + ], + "95446631": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 149" + ], + "954491": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 379", + "Section 341", + "Section 336", + "Section 506" + ], + "95451227": [ + "Section 313", + "Section 379", + "Section 427", + "Section 324", + "Section 448", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 354" + ], + "95452691": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 506", + "Section 498A", + "Section 438" + ], + "95479171": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 376", + "Section 457", + "Section 156" + ], + "95495576": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 34" + ], + "954992": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 332", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 149" + ], + "95500527": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 34" + ], + "960115": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 467" + ], + "96024867": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 307" + ], + "9602670": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "960749": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 506" + ], + "96078206": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 325" + ], + "96093838": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "96095795": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 376", + "Section 511", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 109", + "Section 494", + "Section 120B", + "Section 324" + ], + "95545056": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 323" + ], + "95549212": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 482", + "Section 34", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 228" + ], + "95550366": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 375" + ], + "955616": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 34" + ], + "955624": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 324" + ], + "95576800": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 506" + ], + "95590973": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "95593994": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "955952": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 299" + ], + "95687215": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 427", + "Section 332", + "Section 109", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 143", + "Section 147", + "Section 395", + "Section 420", + "Section 353" + ], + "956900": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 147" + ], + "9574988": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 409" + ], + "95820585": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 506" + ], + "958225": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 336", + "Section 148", + "Section 307" + ], + "95823070": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 306" + ], + "958294": [ + "Section 511", + "Section 120B", + "Section 109" + ], + "95832358": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 323", + "Section 376", + "Section 504", + "Section 511" + ], + "95777864": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 392", + "Section 379", + "Section 302" + ], + "95789950": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 302" + ], + "958102": [ + "Section 500", + "Section 34" + ], + "95846303": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 300" + ], + "958514": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 324" + ], + "958787": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 406" + ], + "958797": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 302" + ], + "95978257": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B" + ], + "960419": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 4", + "Section 409", + "Section 465" + ], + "96047821": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "960519": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 323", + "Section 509" + ], + "96256936": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 365" + ], + "962626": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 326" + ], + "96522692": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 376" + ], + "96523706": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "96528038": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 342", + "Section 325", + "Section 457" + ], + "96542801": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 320" + ], + "96213659": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "962211": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "96230965": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 341" + ], + "96337745": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304", + "Section 306", + "Section 34" + ], + "96343600": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 498A", + "Section 323", + "Section 509" + ], + "962945": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 304", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 307" + ], + "962981": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 376" + ], + "963100": [ + "Section 366A", + "Section 498A", + "Section 376", + "Section 304B", + "Section 34" + ], + "96363885": [ + "Section 500", + "Section 468" + ], + "96397615": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 354", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "964347": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 380" + ], + "964494": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 304" + ], + "96509416": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 353", + "Section 323", + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 147" + ], + "96555345": [ + "Section 229A" + ], + "969932": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 34", + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 148" + ], + "96715274": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "96720": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "96728113": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 323" + ], + "970678": [ + "Section 2", + "Section 452", + "Section 342", + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 3" + ], + "97068360": [ + "Section 13" + ], + "97112940": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 307", + "Section 438", + "Section 34" + ], + "97127392": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 509" + ], + "971296": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302" + ], + "971307": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 376", + "Section 302" + ], + "97130729": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 34", + "Section 313", + "Section 465", + "Section 326", + "Section 304B", + "Section 148", + "Section 307" + ], + "971347": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "9717744": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 307" + ], + "971823": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 448", + "Section 302" + ], + "965935": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "96431949": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 147", + "Section 308", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 326", + "Section 149" + ], + "96634636": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "982110": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "98228655": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 294" + ], + "98243210": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 437" + ], + "98698159": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 294", + "Section 506" + ], + "98709": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 120B" + ], + "98710": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 109", + "Section 34", + "Section 300" + ], + "96617107": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107" + ], + "966175": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 120B" + ], + "96620541": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 406", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 482" + ], + "96631346": [ + "Section 375", + "Section 376", + "Section 156", + "Section 450", + "Section 506", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "96633195": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 354", + "Section 341" + ], + "973338": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "97342761": [ + "Section 364", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "97230868": [ + "Section 229A" + ], + "97547014": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 506" + ], + "97884270": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 34" + ], + "97890149": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 34" + ], + "97892391": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 326", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 324" + ], + "979066": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 324", + "Section 326", + "Section 34", + "Section 300" + ], + "97911943": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 376" + ], + "97916261": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 302", + "Section 498A" + ], + "981701": [ + "Section 397" + ], + "97832102": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 332", + "Section 353", + "Section 143", + "Section 147" + ], + "978584": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 149" + ], + "98147150": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "98156047": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "981744": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 304", + "Section 147", + "Section 326", + "Section 148", + "Section 324" + ], + "983057": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 326", + "Section 307" + ], + "98310086": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 363", + "Section 302", + "Section 366", + "Section 354", + "Section 307", + "Section 313" + ], + "9831138": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 13" + ], + "98316350": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 342", + "Section 376", + "Section 120B" + ], + "98323439": [ + "Section 308", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "98327674": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 147", + "Section 149" + ], + "98352455": [ + "Section 201" + ], + "97239240": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 302", + "Section 379", + "Section 448" + ], + "97253342": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "97277982": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 313", + "Section 156", + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 419", + "Section 306", + "Section 406", + "Section 468", + "Section 420" + ], + "976323": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406" + ], + "976390": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 354", + "Section 511" + ], + "97642583": [ + "Section 173", + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 450", + "Section 354", + "Section 409" + ], + "976522": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 147", + "Section 326" + ], + "976816": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 353", + "Section 164" + ], + "97682364": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 438", + "Section 164" + ], + "97585385": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "976008": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 302", + "Section 320" + ], + "976160": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 143", + "Section 324" + ], + "98250179": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 506", + "Section 354", + "Section 406" + ], + "98278353": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 419", + "Section 420", + "Section 471" + ], + "98290605": [ + "Section 389" + ], + "98414868": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 420" + ], + "98421619": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 34", + "Section 306" + ], + "98425580": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 320", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 354", + "Section 324", + "Section 149", + "Section 506", + "Section 452", + "Section 394", + "Section 353", + "Section 332" + ], + "98546242": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 341", + "Section 406", + "Section 323" + ], + "98548409": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302" + ], + "98559589": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 304" + ], + "99100451": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 392", + "Section 397", + "Section 34" + ], + "99125381": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 341" + ], + "99134587": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 506" + ], + "986210": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "986284": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 313", + "Section 148" + ], + "98629826": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 149" + ], + "98646657": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 341", + "Section 353" + ], + "98649138": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 342" + ], + "98649279": [ + "Section 306" + ], + "98651050": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 294" + ], + "986553": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 365" + ], + "98663242": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 354", + "Section 438", + "Section 506" + ], + "98673415": [ + "Section 279" + ], + "987256": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 313", + "Section 34" + ], + "987988": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 107" + ], + "988171": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 313", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 34" + ], + "99046462": [ + "Section 500", + "Section 506" + ], + "99055362": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 320", + "Section 34", + "Section 406", + "Section 498A" + ], + "993564": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 4", + "Section 34", + "Section 5", + "Section 342" + ], + "99457130": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 379", + "Section 395", + "Section 156" + ], + "99473011": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 148", + "Section 506" + ], + "99475789": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 506", + "Section 3", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "99171734": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 376", + "Section 452" + ], + "99189995": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 504" + ], + "99198155": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 307", + "Section 336" + ], + "99202351": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 320" + ], + "99210243": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 34" + ], + "9921112": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 304", + "Section 143" + ], + "99037843": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 354", + "Section 406", + "Section 498A", + "Section 409", + "Section 173", + "Section 467", + "Section 156", + "Section 468" + ], + "997574": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 5", + "Section 300", + "Section 34" + ], + "99291031": [ + "Section 450", + "Section 376", + "Section 294" + ], + "99294072": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 342" + ], + "99295": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 337" + ], + "99296499": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 365", + "Section 302", + "Section 420", + "Section 364", + "Section 120B", + "Section 384", + "Section 342", + "Section 34", + "Section 193" + ], + "9930051": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498" + ], + "99314540": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 323", + "Section 307" + ], + "993205": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 397", + "Section 173", + "Section 304A", + "Section 120B" + ], + "993505": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 306", + "Section 161", + "Section 304B" + ], + "99404856": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B" + ], + "99432908": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 363" + ], + "99763906": [ + "Section 2", + "Section 228", + "Section 13" + ], + "99588326": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 364", + "Section 392", + "Section 511", + "Section 376" + ], + "99589602": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 420", + "Section 34", + "Section 342", + "Section 323", + "Section 467", + "Section 120B", + "Section 471", + "Section 468" + ], + "996091": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 302" + ], + "996155": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "99628248": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 323", + "Section 498A", + "Section 320" + ], + "99637": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "99639508": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "99667145": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 427" + ], + "99682333": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 34", + "Section 308", + "Section 341" + ], + "99717289": [ + "Section 337", + "Section 304", + "Section 279" + ], + "99721970": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 506", + "Section 467", + "Section 468" + ], + "99743246": [ + "Section 389", + "Section 397" + ], + "99747846": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 438", + "Section 323" + ], + "99748446": [ + "Section 395" + ], + "99749975": [ + "Section 389" + ], + "99808598": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 326", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 147", + "Section 5", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 294" + ], + "99811504": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 120", + "Section 3", + "Section 389", + "Section 148", + "Section 201", + "Section 323", + "Section 147" + ], + "99822494": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 376", + "Section 366" + ], + "99904410": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 379", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 397" + ], + "100141802": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 397", + "Section 392" + ], + "100144131": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 302" + ], + "100146695": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 452", + "Section 353", + "Section 354", + "Section 376" + ], + "100161674": [ + "Section 107", + "Section 306" + ], + "100169692": [ + "Section 120B" + ], + "100349445": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 120B" + ], + "100349870": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 452", + "Section 147", + "Section 506", + "Section 149", + "Section 308", + "Section 148", + "Section 228" + ], + "100355028": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "100380856": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 354", + "Section 506", + "Section 155", + "Section 482", + "Section 156" + ], + "1003810": [ + "Section 395", + "Section 379", + "Section 506", + "Section 143", + "Section 147", + "Section 504", + "Section 307", + "Section 427", + "Section 323", + "Section 120", + "Section 34", + "Section 341", + "Section 149" + ], + "100381744": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 376", + "Section 511", + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 375", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "1003957": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 302" + ], + "10039842": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 438", + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 468" + ], + "100447662": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 34", + "Section 120B", + "Section 468", + "Section 155", + "Section 482", + "Section 156" + ], + "10045": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 313", + "Section 302", + "Section 149" + ], + "100456857": [ + "Section 332", + "Section 34", + "Section 307" + ], + "100471711": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 326", + "Section 504", + "Section 325", + "Section 307" + ], + "1004788": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 306", + "Section 304B", + "Section 304", + "Section 498" + ], + "1005201": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 326" + ], + "100533151": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "100842528": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304B", + "Section 34" + ], + "100859236": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 354", + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "100861443": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 406", + "Section 437", + "Section 363", + "Section 34", + "Section 420", + "Section 498A", + "Section 392" + ], + "100778090": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 354", + "Section 506", + "Section 420", + "Section 452" + ], + "100805141": [ + "Section 156", + "Section 34" + ], + "100814867": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 324", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 341", + "Section 307" + ], + "100816561": [ + "Section 107", + "Section 306" + ], + "100821525": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 354", + "Section 511", + "Section 325", + "Section 376", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 450", + "Section 467", + "Section 465", + "Section 471" + ], + "100868595": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 4", + "Section 375", + "Section 509" + ], + "100876905": [ + "Section 200" + ], + "100877846": [ + "Section 299", + "Section 326" + ], + "100907045": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 34" + ], + "100908210": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406" + ], + "101095439": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 326", + "Section 300" + ], + "101217106": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "101368607": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 465", + "Section 471" + ], + "100957161": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 376", + "Section 375" + ], + "100979241": [ + "Section 107", + "Section 306" + ], + "100994090": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 156", + "Section 506", + "Section 324", + "Section 325" + ], + "101339260": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 353", + "Section 34", + "Section 332" + ], + "101360571": [ + "Section 511", + "Section 376", + "Section 375" + ], + "101158222": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 326" + ], + "101164003": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 452", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 506" + ], + "1011684": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 107" + ], + "101179822": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "1011833": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 300" + ], + "1011056": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 228", + "Section 193" + ], + "101107975": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "101123233": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 341", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 332", + "Section 120B", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 149", + "Section 186" + ], + "1011368": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 467", + "Section 427", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 468", + "Section 120B" + ], + "101528239": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 3" + ], + "101532554": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 394", + "Section 342" + ], + "101532988": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "101385565": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "1013885": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 34" + ], + "101402131": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 375" + ], + "1015612": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 300" + ], + "1015822": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 380", + "Section 161", + "Section 300" + ], + "101584902": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 190", + "Section 324", + "Section 482", + "Section 325", + "Section 34", + "Section 200" + ], + "1015850": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 34", + "Section 149" + ], + "1015879": [ + "Section 380" + ], + "101590195": [ + "Section 190", + "Section 228" + ], + "101601971": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 323" + ], + "101643643": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "101663861": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "101664843": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "101676005": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "101676434": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "101681478": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 307", + "Section 450", + "Section 326", + "Section 320" + ], + "101710422": [ + "Section 511", + "Section 380" + ], + "1017237": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 394" + ], + "101758767": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 341", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 427", + "Section 397" + ], + "101771991": [ + "Section 436", + "Section 363", + "Section 437", + "Section 419" + ], + "101772907": [ + "Section 417", + "Section 34", + "Section 376" + ], + "101953152": [ + "Section 313", + "Section 498A", + "Section 201", + "Section 342", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 299", + "Section 304B" + ], + "1019628": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 326", + "Section 506" + ], + "101965482": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 323", + "Section 341", + "Section 406", + "Section 504", + "Section 452", + "Section 34", + "Section 147", + "Section 506", + "Section 148" + ], + "101907311": [ + "Section 389" + ], + "101922267": [ + "Section 457", + "Section 411", + "Section 380" + ], + "1019251": [ + "Section 395", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 427", + "Section 336", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 397", + "Section 148", + "Section 34", + "Section 341" + ], + "1019429": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 143", + "Section 120B", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 109", + "Section 34" + ], + "101994247": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "102006256": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "1020065": [ + "Section 200", + "Section 500" + ], + "1020113": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 326", + "Section 448" + ], + "10207389": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 307", + "Section 498", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 438" + ], + "102093459": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 313" + ], + "1021175": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 228" + ], + "102237334": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 325" + ], + "102242046": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 306" + ], + "101604350": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 294" + ], + "1018069": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 342" + ], + "102245046": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 365", + "Section 34", + "Section 366A", + "Section 438" + ], + "1022829": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "102283876": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107", + "Section 201" + ], + "10229171": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 326", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 323" + ], + "1022951": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 436" + ], + "102302432": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 120" + ], + "102341282": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "1023889": [ + "Section 313", + "Section 302", + "Section 364" + ], + "102597437": [ + "Section 13" + ], + "1026005": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 452", + "Section 504", + "Section 324", + "Section 323" + ], + "102676898": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 376", + "Section 34", + "Section 363" + ], + "102679163": [ + "Section 500", + "Section 447", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 498" + ], + "102700592": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 354", + "Section 294" + ], + "1027045": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 411" + ], + "102704791": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 363", + "Section 120B", + "Section 332", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 417" + ], + "102704973": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 161", + "Section 313" + ], + "10271": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 34" + ], + "102756399": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "102757001": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 294", + "Section 34" + ], + "102763418": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 376" + ], + "102766255": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 313", + "Section 304" + ], + "102771816": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "102782991": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 511" + ], + "102786340": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 436", + "Section 326" + ], + "1028092": [ + "Section 365", + "Section 201", + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "102843582": [ + "Section 375" + ], + "102850256": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "1028561": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 3", + "Section 4" + ], + "102881714": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 506" + ], + "102882461": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 341", + "Section 353", + "Section 147", + "Section 336", + "Section 294" + ], + "102892097": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 363" + ], + "102904554": [ + "Section 500", + "Section 120B", + "Section 379", + "Section 34", + "Section 504", + "Section 509", + "Section 354" + ], + "102908146": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 324" + ], + "102922026": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 308", + "Section 438", + "Section 34" + ], + "102922567": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 307" + ], + "102924632": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 120", + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 482" + ], + "102927562": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 34", + "Section 397" + ], + "102930940": [ + "Section 511", + "Section 448" + ], + "10293324": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 420" + ], + "103024367": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "103050875": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 307", + "Section 353" + ], + "1031248": [ + "Section 417", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 419", + "Section 406", + "Section 420" + ], + "148210398": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420" + ], + "148225261": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 201" + ], + "1482287": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 336" + ], + "156042540": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 506" + ], + "156052804": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 302", + "Section 353", + "Section 313" + ], + "103083583": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 482", + "Section 341", + "Section 324", + "Section 506" + ], + "103115299": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 323", + "Section 450", + "Section 294" + ], + "103290840": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 308" + ], + "1032910": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 304" + ], + "103291078": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 406", + "Section 304" + ], + "103298913": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 307" + ], + "103299701": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "103195746": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 468" + ], + "10320778": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 161", + "Section 302", + "Section 149" + ], + "103148927": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 34" + ], + "103166223": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 438" + ], + "103170076": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420" + ], + "103435956": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 304", + "Section 34", + "Section 299", + "Section 341" + ], + "103442866": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "103061582": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "1035023": [ + "Section 389", + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 120B", + "Section 379" + ], + "10332369": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 143" + ], + "103327204": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406" + ], + "1033301": [ + "Section 173", + "Section 452", + "Section 120B", + "Section 114" + ], + "103364021": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "10338307": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 506", + "Section 366" + ], + "103554032": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 392", + "Section 397" + ], + "103557587": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B" + ], + "10355775": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 148" + ], + "103570373": [ + "Section 107", + "Section 306" + ], + "103570654": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 201", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 304B" + ], + "1035719": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 419" + ], + "103643949": [ + "Section 419", + "Section 420", + "Section 468" + ], + "103654117": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 320", + "Section 300" + ], + "1036611": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 397" + ], + "103701964": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "103706756": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 506", + "Section 326", + "Section 173", + "Section 504", + "Section 482", + "Section 394" + ], + "103787630": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 504" + ], + "103794302": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 143", + "Section 302", + "Section 504", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "103798732": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "1038041": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 392", + "Section 302" + ], + "103806465": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 354", + "Section 452", + "Section 376" + ], + "103965844": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 406" + ], + "103974966": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 161", + "Section 34", + "Section 313" + ], + "1039791": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 304" + ], + "104347997": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 149", + "Section 364" + ], + "104348854": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 406", + "Section 498A" + ], + "104357080": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 452" + ], + "104364607": [ + "Section 338", + "Section 420", + "Section 279", + "Section 511" + ], + "1041089": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 452" + ], + "104383007": [ + "Section 279", + "Section 337", + "Section 338", + "Section 304A", + "Section 397" + ], + "1043893": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 325", + "Section 320", + "Section 397", + "Section 324" + ], + "104393131": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 395", + "Section 323", + "Section 427", + "Section 452", + "Section 149", + "Section 436", + "Section 148", + "Section 34", + "Section 397", + "Section 307", + "Section 120B", + "Section 336", + "Section 353", + "Section 120", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 332", + "Section 186" + ], + "1043973": [ + "Section 447", + "Section 427", + "Section 34" + ], + "1043990": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 325", + "Section 320", + "Section 120B", + "Section 109" + ], + "104031635": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 2" + ], + "1040443": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 366", + "Section 376", + "Section 395", + "Section 307", + "Section 504", + "Section 324", + "Section 304", + "Section 363", + "Section 397", + "Section 306", + "Section 498A", + "Section 149", + "Section 411", + "Section 325", + "Section 511", + "Section 452", + "Section 147", + "Section 354", + "Section 379", + "Section 304B" + ], + "104078430": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 34" + ], + "104081108": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 307" + ], + "104093263": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 511" + ], + "104098937": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 366" + ], + "104099680": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 342", + "Section 506", + "Section 143" + ], + "104105569": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 114", + "Section 325", + "Section 109" + ], + "1041064": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 304", + "Section 326", + "Section 307" + ], + "1041065": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 394", + "Section 34", + "Section 411" + ], + "1044989": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 34", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 304", + "Section 427" + ], + "1045118": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 471", + "Section 465", + "Section 468", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467" + ], + "104453268": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 326", + "Section 34", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 448", + "Section 149", + "Section 324" + ], + "104455438": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 448", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "1046491": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 506", + "Section 409", + "Section 471", + "Section 120B", + "Section 155", + "Section 482", + "Section 500", + "Section 156" + ], + "1046645": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 326", + "Section 109" + ], + "104669209": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 380", + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 482", + "Section 34", + "Section 320", + "Section 120B", + "Section 506", + "Section 409", + "Section 379" + ], + "10478371": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 506" + ], + "1047854": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 332", + "Section 186" + ], + "1046733": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 504", + "Section 420", + "Section 506" + ], + "104738873": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 326", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "1063813": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "106950110": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "107000251": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "105076544": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 427", + "Section 452" + ], + "105095073": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 294" + ], + "104801301": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "104857062": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 498", + "Section 417" + ], + "104861498": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "1049522": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "104952706": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 397", + "Section 392" + ], + "104953301": [ + "Section 4", + "Section 5", + "Section 2", + "Section 3" + ], + "104965178": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 389" + ], + "104928945": [ + "Section 161" + ], + "104932678": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "104934489": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 457" + ], + "105017540": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 34" + ], + "105020900": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 341", + "Section 353", + "Section 380", + "Section 457", + "Section 427", + "Section 511", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 336" + ], + "1051425": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 313" + ], + "1051584": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 147", + "Section 149", + "Section 148" + ], + "1051740": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 299", + "Section 482", + "Section 308", + "Section 324" + ], + "105179130": [ + "Section 389" + ], + "10518": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "1052195": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "1052610": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 332", + "Section 506" + ], + "105283091": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 302" + ], + "1054982": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 302" + ], + "105501119": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 406", + "Section 482", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 320" + ], + "105520127": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506" + ], + "105524597": [ + "Section 173" + ], + "1056440": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 380", + "Section 114", + "Section 457" + ], + "105661078": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 294" + ], + "105663767": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 147" + ], + "105670039": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "1056734": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 304", + "Section 325" + ], + "1056786": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 300" + ], + "105679287": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 409", + "Section 415" + ], + "105786395": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 365", + "Section 363" + ], + "1057960": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 504", + "Section 323" + ], + "105799655": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 498A", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 323" + ], + "105816163": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 3", + "Section 341" + ], + "1058168": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 161", + "Section 324", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 313" + ], + "1057289": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 394" + ], + "1057370": [ + "Section 363" + ], + "105745761": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1057669": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 471" + ], + "1054225": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 34" + ], + "1054318": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 467" + ], + "105543740": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 471" + ], + "105843311": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 506", + "Section 467", + "Section 419", + "Section 468" + ], + "105849802": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 143" + ], + "105851270": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 379", + "Section 448", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 149" + ], + "105407634": [ + "Section 389" + ], + "105728164": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 34" + ], + "106163717": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 419" + ], + "1062440": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 307" + ], + "105924388": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 420" + ], + "105934629": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 438", + "Section 325", + "Section 326" + ], + "105939132": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "105889380": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 389" + ], + "105997211": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 363", + "Section 366A" + ], + "1060261": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 354", + "Section 376", + "Section 299", + "Section 34", + "Section 300" + ], + "105943557": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 34", + "Section 306" + ], + "105971461": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "1059883": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 120B", + "Section 228" + ], + "106094583": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 380", + "Section 147", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 427", + "Section 452" + ], + "1061334": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 448", + "Section 436", + "Section 302", + "Section 364" + ], + "10613877": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "106139398": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "106185387": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107" + ], + "1062066": [ + "Section 5" + ], + "106254621": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "106255377": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "1062757": [ + "Section 164" + ], + "106243405": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 341", + "Section 509", + "Section 323", + "Section 354" + ], + "106356534": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302" + ], + "106366969": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 147" + ], + "106705612": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 294" + ], + "106717590": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 366" + ], + "1067331": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "106735046": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 411", + "Section 306", + "Section 419", + "Section 406" + ], + "106739121": [ + "Section 384", + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "1067439": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 302", + "Section 438", + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 306", + "Section 482", + "Section 436" + ], + "1067497": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 120B", + "Section 302" + ], + "1064819": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 299", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 326", + "Section 511", + "Section 341", + "Section 324" + ], + "1064934": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 326" + ], + "1064439": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "106444577": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 419" + ], + "106446954": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 354", + "Section 34", + "Section 342", + "Section 438", + "Section 506" + ], + "106451559": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 304" + ], + "106562284": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 376", + "Section 313" + ], + "106568196": [ + "Section 190", + "Section 200", + "Section 307", + "Section 397", + "Section 482", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 326", + "Section 504", + "Section 427", + "Section 149", + "Section 506", + "Section 324", + "Section 173" + ], + "106507415": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 307", + "Section 482" + ], + "106509924": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 34", + "Section 447", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 438" + ], + "106515266": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 307", + "Section 326", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 294", + "Section 506", + "Section 324" + ], + "106587404": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 354" + ], + "106607259": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 341", + "Section 336", + "Section 397", + "Section 379", + "Section 427", + "Section 302" + ], + "106616257": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "1066229": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 467" + ], + "106636645": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 34" + ], + "106640286": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 376", + "Section 109", + "Section 366A" + ], + "106644455": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 450", + "Section 302", + "Section 511" + ], + "106649749": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 354", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "1066628": [ + "Section 120B" + ], + "1070947": [ + "Section 5" + ], + "1070976": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 201", + "Section 34", + "Section 304" + ], + "107110": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 417", + "Section 465", + "Section 511" + ], + "107047092": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 308", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 506" + ], + "1070506": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 120B", + "Section 506", + "Section 420", + "Section 193", + "Section 188" + ], + "107070809": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "106810754": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 504", + "Section 326", + "Section 342", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 363", + "Section 307" + ], + "106814962": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "106823859": [ + "Section 419", + "Section 468", + "Section 471" + ], + "106825401": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420" + ], + "106829842": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 465" + ], + "106830167": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 397", + "Section 392", + "Section 411" + ], + "106856094": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 120", + "Section 482", + "Section 120B", + "Section 468" + ], + "106861567": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 302" + ], + "106862042": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 341" + ], + "106879566": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 308", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "106880941": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 364" + ], + "106885596": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 120B" + ], + "107124178": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 294" + ], + "1071311": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 341", + "Section 324", + "Section 326", + "Section 294", + "Section 302" + ], + "107138303": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "107138326": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 341" + ], + "107142733": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 353", + "Section 147", + "Section 341", + "Section 143" + ], + "107156229": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 323", + "Section 376" + ], + "107211028": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 34", + "Section 438" + ], + "1072261": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 34" + ], + "10732": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 376", + "Section 342" + ], + "1073217": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 304" + ], + "1073393": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 13", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467", + "Section 409" + ], + "107351216": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 420" + ], + "107143797": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 397" + ], + "107302474": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A", + "Section 354", + "Section 452" + ], + "1074231": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "107547164": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 506" + ], + "108131994": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 498A", + "Section 471", + "Section 34" + ], + "141158957": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 324", + "Section 504", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 147" + ], + "1432851": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 323", + "Section 294", + "Section 200", + "Section 482", + "Section 161", + "Section 506", + "Section 467" + ], + "1448715": [ + "Section 308", + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 302", + "Section 299", + "Section 325", + "Section 34", + "Section 324" + ], + "108020097": [ + "Section 164", + "Section 34", + "Section 394", + "Section 397", + "Section 302" + ], + "1080273": [ + "Section 120B" + ], + "107974875": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 156" + ], + "107975085": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 336", + "Section 323", + "Section 294", + "Section 506" + ], + "107976366": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 3", + "Section 34" + ], + "107979936": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 341", + "Section 325", + "Section 307", + "Section 323" + ], + "107590617": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 279" + ], + "107623815": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 427", + "Section 506", + "Section 406", + "Section 155", + "Section 482", + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 302", + "Section 156", + "Section 34" + ], + "107640773": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "1076936": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "107775": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 148", + "Section 324", + "Section 326", + "Section 149" + ], + "107779451": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 320" + ], + "1080489": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "108063005": [ + "Section 228" + ], + "108065306": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 34", + "Section 107" + ], + "1080819": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 436", + "Section 307" + ], + "108086019": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 392", + "Section 354", + "Section 411", + "Section 34" + ], + "108110930": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 427", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 392", + "Section 452" + ], + "10812575": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "108126708": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 304", + "Section 114" + ], + "1074322": [ + "Section 5" + ], + "107436542": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 120" + ], + "107443867": [ + "Section 5", + "Section 447", + "Section 279", + "Section 143" + ], + "108173094": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 494", + "Section 498" + ], + "1081747": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 364", + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 149", + "Section 148" + ], + "1081911": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 34", + "Section 482", + "Section 156", + "Section 415", + "Section 120B", + "Section 200", + "Section 190", + "Section 467" + ], + "108195273": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "1082001": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 419", + "Section 468", + "Section 120B" + ], + "108253898": [ + "Section 389", + "Section 325", + "Section 294" + ], + "108259675": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 156" + ], + "1083024": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 34" + ], + "108308898": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 304" + ], + "1083228": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "108377944": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 320", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 504" + ], + "1083864": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1084216": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 34", + "Section 107" + ], + "108508125": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 13", + "Section 420", + "Section 161", + "Section 302" + ], + "1085586": [ + "Section 13" + ], + "108787168": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 354", + "Section 471", + "Section 420" + ], + "108794870": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "108814348": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 229A", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 174A", + "Section 452" + ], + "108824706": [ + "Section 120B" + ], + "1091287": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 389", + "Section 323" + ], + "109132733": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 120B", + "Section 379", + "Section 420", + "Section 468" + ], + "10913299": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "10915852": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 3", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "109209223": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 419", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 438" + ], + "109212799": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "109231107": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 448", + "Section 427", + "Section 307", + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 379" + ], + "109251509": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 406", + "Section 156" + ], + "10925244": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 376", + "Section 3" + ], + "1092659": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 193", + "Section 201", + "Section 420", + "Section 342", + "Section 341", + "Section 384" + ], + "1092676": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 34" + ], + "108920657": [ + "Section 395", + "Section 392" + ], + "1089240": [ + "Section 366" + ], + "1089383": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 341" + ], + "1090129": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 300", + "Section 307", + "Section 304" + ], + "1090222": [ + "Section 395" + ], + "109515823": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 342", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 341", + "Section 147" + ], + "109522890": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 427", + "Section 307", + "Section 448", + "Section 324", + "Section 353", + "Section 336", + "Section 384", + "Section 457", + "Section 380", + "Section 147", + "Section 148" + ], + "109523932": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 148", + "Section 325", + "Section 504", + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "1095270": [ + "Section 308", + "Section 300", + "Section 307", + "Section 302" + ], + "10954572": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "109548523": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "109705475": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 294" + ], + "109735990": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "109248073": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 323" + ], + "109413208": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 325" + ], + "1095222": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 304", + "Section 375" + ], + "109652844": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "109693960": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 468" + ], + "1096986": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 324" + ], + "109699431": [ + "Section 494", + "Section 109", + "Section 323", + "Section 498A" + ], + "109700945": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "109804435": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 34" + ], + "109841516": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 326" + ], + "1098446": [ + "Section 498A" + ], + "109854": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 313", + "Section 34" + ], + "109859200": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 147", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 326", + "Section 149" + ], + "109865915": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1098840": [ + "Section 500" + ], + "1099363": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 447", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 326", + "Section 354", + "Section 452", + "Section 143" + ], + "1099426": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 302", + "Section 320", + "Section 380", + "Section 457" + ], + "1099509": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 34", + "Section 109", + "Section 354" + ], + "10995147": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "109955742": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 325", + "Section 324", + "Section 147", + "Section 448", + "Section 323" + ], + "109955999": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 376", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "1099771": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 34", + "Section 147", + "Section 148" + ], + "11083740": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 324", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "110853926": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "110857530": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "110860962": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 392", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 341", + "Section 302", + "Section 336", + "Section 427" + ], + "110308879": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "1104676": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 415" + ], + "110378783": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 452" + ], + "110391329": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 452", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 450", + "Section 147", + "Section 300", + "Section 149", + "Section 148" + ], + "110391474": [ + "Section 5" + ], + "110395895": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "110403364": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 415" + ], + "110416022": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 392" + ], + "1104161": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 468", + "Section 341" + ], + "11043133": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "1104448": [ + "Section 173", + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 190", + "Section 120B", + "Section 419", + "Section 409" + ], + "110483633": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 500" + ], + "11048667": [ + "Section 308", + "Section 452", + "Section 34", + "Section 323" + ], + "1104938": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 320", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "11052778": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 325", + "Section 324", + "Section 147" + ], + "1107328": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 4", + "Section 420", + "Section 279", + "Section 325", + "Section 34" + ], + "110779286": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "110785409": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "112885646": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 304", + "Section 120B", + "Section 342", + "Section 323", + "Section 504" + ], + "1128871": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 304A" + ], + "1109174": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 363", + "Section 364" + ], + "1109301": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 341", + "Section 147", + "Section 313", + "Section 448", + "Section 323" + ], + "110934432": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 437", + "Section 457" + ], + "110957682": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 120B" + ], + "110963759": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "110973079": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 332", + "Section 324", + "Section 353", + "Section 294", + "Section 392", + "Section 323" + ], + "111046678": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 120B", + "Section 448" + ], + "1110600": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 395", + "Section 313", + "Section 397" + ], + "1110608": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1110721": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "111091300": [ + "Section 452" + ], + "111093244": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 380" + ], + "111098384": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 342", + "Section 323", + "Section 366" + ], + "111106973": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "1124581": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "112464": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "112465": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 306" + ], + "112412160": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 325" + ], + "112419179": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 326", + "Section 506", + "Section 504" + ], + "112447186": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 504", + "Section 143" + ], + "11171558": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120" + ], + "111775224": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "111233883": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "111235818": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 304", + "Section 114" + ], + "111248757": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 304", + "Section 498A" + ], + "111642285": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 342", + "Section 323" + ], + "111645183": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 394" + ], + "111663895": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 304", + "Section 306" + ], + "111673949": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 376" + ], + "111428733": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 506", + "Section 417" + ], + "111439735": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 324" + ], + "1114423": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 511" + ], + "1114512": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 326", + "Section 34" + ], + "1114531": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 397", + "Section 392", + "Section 147", + "Section 452", + "Section 148", + "Section 365", + "Section 342" + ], + "111460304": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 120B" + ], + "111466562": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "111487706": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 307" + ], + "111503538": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 447", + "Section 326", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "111696967": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 34" + ], + "111716358": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420" + ], + "111733948": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 506" + ], + "111748568": [ + "Section 193" + ], + "111803062": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "111806887": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 2", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 34" + ], + "1118120": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 415" + ], + "111843399": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 34" + ], + "1118437": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 148", + "Section 326", + "Section 341", + "Section 228", + "Section 313", + "Section 114" + ], + "111852888": [ + "Section 452" + ], + "11185896": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "111561609": [ + "Section 200", + "Section 34", + "Section 190", + "Section 380", + "Section 482", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "111570826": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 504", + "Section 324", + "Section 323" + ], + "11157350": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 376" + ], + "111876164": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "11189944": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 341" + ], + "111912447": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 143", + "Section 427", + "Section 379", + "Section 341", + "Section 332", + "Section 353", + "Section 307" + ], + "111919635": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 120" + ], + "1115791": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 452", + "Section 325", + "Section 148", + "Section 427", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 353", + "Section 201" + ], + "1116012": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "1116100": [ + "Section 120B" + ], + "11161086": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 394", + "Section 34" + ], + "11193343": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1119508": [ + "Section 384", + "Section 506", + "Section 447", + "Section 143", + "Section 341" + ], + "111967785": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 149" + ], + "111977826": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 341", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 336", + "Section 120", + "Section 506", + "Section 384", + "Section 427" + ], + "11197811": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 452" + ], + "112004163": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 294", + "Section 323" + ], + "1120043": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 120B", + "Section 397" + ], + "1120056": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 279" + ], + "111381085": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 409", + "Section 468" + ], + "112255505": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 307", + "Section 326", + "Section 323", + "Section 148", + "Section 504", + "Section 149", + "Section 506" + ], + "112051717": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 320", + "Section 409", + "Section 120B", + "Section 406" + ], + "1120620": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 482", + "Section 406" + ], + "112190813": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 342", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "112202132": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 336", + "Section 323", + "Section 294", + "Section 506" + ], + "111397293": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 427", + "Section 294", + "Section 186" + ], + "112487617": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 34", + "Section 498" + ], + "112492820": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1125658": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "112652269": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 148" + ], + "112666982": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "1127964": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 437", + "Section 427", + "Section 149", + "Section 147" + ], + "112821433": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "112955261": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "112956121": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 341", + "Section 509" + ], + "1129584": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "112914853": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 341", + "Section 452" + ], + "112935579": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 406", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 320" + ], + "11293585": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 294" + ], + "112936277": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 299", + "Section 324", + "Section 304", + "Section 307" + ], + "113058427": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 34" + ], + "113074": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 201" + ], + "113183706": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 325" + ], + "1131848": [ + "Section 366A", + "Section 363", + "Section 511", + "Section 376" + ], + "113123357": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 394" + ], + "113138703": [ + "Section 300" + ], + "1131465": [ + "Section 120B" + ], + "113487835": [ + "Section 313", + "Section 302", + "Section 342", + "Section 34" + ], + "113496133": [ + "Section 13" + ], + "113515019": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 120B" + ], + "1135333": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 394" + ], + "113554220": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 306", + "Section 304", + "Section 161", + "Section 109" + ], + "1135543": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "1135924": [ + "Section 364", + "Section 365", + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 120B" + ], + "1126950": [ + "Section 120B" + ], + "112695949": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "112698890": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 354", + "Section 307", + "Section 438", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "112709779": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 448", + "Section 323" + ], + "113726051": [ + "Section 2", + "Section 380", + "Section 457" + ], + "113151273": [ + "Section 365", + "Section 384" + ], + "113153734": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 324", + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "113158544": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "113168731": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "113239157": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366A", + "Section 34" + ], + "113239720": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "113626962": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 304" + ], + "113642992": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 506", + "Section 147", + "Section 143", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 504" + ], + "113652530": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 228" + ], + "113967165": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 324" + ], + "113680154": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107" + ], + "113696347": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 342", + "Section 504", + "Section 511", + "Section 376" + ], + "113701391": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 498A" + ], + "113816912": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 307" + ], + "113741044": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 34" + ], + "113741520": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 506", + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "113752061": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 294" + ], + "114938983": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 302" + ], + "1137693": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 415", + "Section 120B", + "Section 120" + ], + "1137733": [ + "Section 300" + ], + "113798592": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 419", + "Section 504", + "Section 420", + "Section 506", + "Section 467", + "Section 156" + ], + "1142123": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 147", + "Section 436", + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 161", + "Section 4", + "Section 5" + ], + "114216944": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "114144582": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "114152538": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 498", + "Section 420" + ], + "1141543": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 120B", + "Section 109" + ], + "114183636": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 308", + "Section 341" + ], + "114183898": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 406" + ], + "114186994": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 457", + "Section 201", + "Section 300", + "Section 354", + "Section 506" + ], + "114188291": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 482", + "Section 190" + ], + "115540853": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 409", + "Section 438", + "Section 467", + "Section 34" + ], + "115542": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 228" + ], + "114243965": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 448", + "Section 34" + ], + "114259038": [ + "Section 308", + "Section 34", + "Section 506" + ], + "114318824": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 427", + "Section 336", + "Section 332", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 353" + ], + "114323199": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "11433766": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 324", + "Section 323" + ], + "114338046": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 149" + ], + "114343965": [ + "Section 332", + "Section 147", + "Section 148" + ], + "114667985": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 307", + "Section 438" + ], + "1146722": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 304A" + ], + "1146790": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 338", + "Section 320", + "Section 300" + ], + "1146860": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 409" + ], + "114690730": [ + "Section 228", + "Section 34", + "Section 406", + "Section 366" + ], + "114697210": [ + "Section 143", + "Section 341", + "Section 384", + "Section 342", + "Section 363", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 354", + "Section 326", + "Section 438" + ], + "11470642": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306" + ], + "1152078": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 471", + "Section 465", + "Section 419" + ], + "1147937": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 149", + "Section 147" + ], + "114799596": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 504" + ], + "115063123": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 326", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 302" + ], + "1150652": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 394" + ], + "114927673": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 395" + ], + "114939931": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1149600": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 304B" + ], + "114974455": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 419", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 188", + "Section 500", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 34", + "Section 406", + "Section 109", + "Section 193", + "Section 114", + "Section 427", + "Section 467" + ], + "114974656": [ + "Section 419", + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 420" + ], + "114976921": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 397", + "Section 34", + "Section 341" + ], + "1149816": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406" + ], + "115146160": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 294" + ], + "115188386": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 306" + ], + "1151922": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 437", + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 308" + ], + "1152284": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120B" + ], + "115232064": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304", + "Section 302" + ], + "11523394": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 365", + "Section 34" + ], + "1152404": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 323", + "Section 341", + "Section 336", + "Section 148" + ], + "115245": [ + "Section 308", + "Section 147", + "Section 149", + "Section 323", + "Section 325" + ], + "115254416": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 342", + "Section 324" + ], + "1152656": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 380" + ], + "115266880": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "1152747": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 409", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 415" + ], + "115300393": [ + "Section 201" + ], + "115307078": [ + "Section 389", + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "115488778": [ + "Section 332", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 353", + "Section 147", + "Section 452", + "Section 379" + ], + "115489388": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 323" + ], + "1155034": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 5" + ], + "115511410": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 506" + ], + "115682582": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 120", + "Section 511" + ], + "115683325": [ + "Section 509", + "Section 419" + ], + "1157040": [ + "Section 120", + "Section 302" + ], + "1157885": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 302", + "Section 308", + "Section 304", + "Section 498" + ], + "1157906": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 353", + "Section 332" + ], + "115849265": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 506" + ], + "115864572": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 148" + ], + "1153540": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 149" + ], + "116150914": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "1158892": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 397" + ], + "115890819": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 494", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 498A", + "Section 120B" + ], + "115897339": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 307" + ], + "115901800": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 201", + "Section 409", + "Section 468", + "Section 467" + ], + "115907509": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 323" + ], + "115988190": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 376", + "Section 511", + "Section 34" + ], + "11602449": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 5" + ], + "1160251": [ + "Section 500" + ], + "116027721": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 326", + "Section 143", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 324" + ], + "116054402": [ + "Section 452" + ], + "116062898": [ + "Section 320", + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 324" + ], + "116067558": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506" + ], + "1160727": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 409", + "Section 120B", + "Section 468", + "Section 34", + "Section 471" + ], + "116084942": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 376", + "Section 34", + "Section 417" + ], + "116101678": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 376" + ], + "116427322": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 336", + "Section 307", + "Section 341", + "Section 427", + "Section 506", + "Section 147" + ], + "1164346": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "116367214": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "116385951": [ + "Section 494", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 504" + ], + "117982563": [ + "Section 304B" + ], + "1182111": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 120B", + "Section 506", + "Section 467" + ], + "1182753": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 148", + "Section 452", + "Section 147", + "Section 5" + ], + "118653996": [ + "Section 500" + ], + "116449172": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 304B" + ], + "116449914": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 307" + ], + "116471876": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 427", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "116575386": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "116512257": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 313", + "Section 420", + "Section 498A", + "Section 468", + "Section 467" + ], + "116515246": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "116530556": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 506" + ], + "116539956": [ + "Section 229A" + ], + "116563809": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "116662225": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 155", + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 156", + "Section 392" + ], + "1166797": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "1166214": [ + "Section 186", + "Section 332" + ], + "116641": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 313", + "Section 307" + ], + "116653184": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 427", + "Section 147", + "Section 436", + "Section 156", + "Section 173", + "Section 506" + ], + "116682921": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "116713282": [ + "Section 419", + "Section 467", + "Section 506", + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 471" + ], + "1169677": [ + "Section 409" + ], + "1188215": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 354", + "Section 294" + ], + "118833823": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 34", + "Section 397" + ], + "11885024": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "116891367": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "116939398": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "116992255": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 323" + ], + "116993059": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 323", + "Section 354" + ], + "117016030": [ + "Section 143", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 4", + "Section 149", + "Section 307" + ], + "117065279": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 324" + ], + "117121378": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 34", + "Section 306" + ], + "117122970": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 341" + ], + "1171449": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306" + ], + "117241625": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 186", + "Section 363" + ], + "1172598": [ + "Section 313", + "Section 326", + "Section 376", + "Section 320", + "Section 307" + ], + "117265410": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 201", + "Section 34" + ], + "117308975": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 397", + "Section 302", + "Section 364" + ], + "117328781": [ + "Section 228", + "Section 193" + ], + "117366453": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 452", + "Section 482", + "Section 147", + "Section 364", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 427", + "Section 324" + ], + "117398138": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 376" + ], + "117407361": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 201" + ], + "1174249": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 323" + ], + "117437443": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "117471037": [ + "Section 395", + "Section 397" + ], + "117481575": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 326", + "Section 325" + ], + "117494980": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 109", + "Section 417", + "Section 420", + "Section 3", + "Section 375" + ], + "1171157": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "117662116": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 294" + ], + "1176750": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406" + ], + "117676066": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 392", + "Section 450", + "Section 452" + ], + "117676098": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 332", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 326", + "Section 149" + ], + "117714060": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 34", + "Section 107" + ], + "117719425": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 354", + "Section 294" + ], + "1177197": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 395", + "Section 397", + "Section 4", + "Section 392" + ], + "117736283": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "11774172": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 397", + "Section 394" + ], + "117747037": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 389", + "Section 306", + "Section 392" + ], + "117798290": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 336", + "Section 323" + ], + "117808508": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 379" + ], + "117830821": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 306", + "Section 498A", + "Section 498" + ], + "118171332": [ + "Section 5", + "Section 437" + ], + "118179554": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 326", + "Section 148", + "Section 307" + ], + "1181997": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 420" + ], + "118570155": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 120", + "Section 120B" + ], + "11857728": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "118581191": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "1178328": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 323", + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 325", + "Section 436", + "Section 148", + "Section 324" + ], + "117844359": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366A", + "Section 120B" + ], + "117859307": [ + "Section 279" + ], + "11788173": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 376", + "Section 201" + ], + "117890749": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 392" + ], + "117896439": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 364", + "Section 342", + "Section 148", + "Section 506" + ], + "117898238": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "117903": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 379", + "Section 147", + "Section 448" + ], + "11794394": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 363", + "Section 506" + ], + "11794847": [ + "Section 190", + "Section 109" + ], + "117956675": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 366" + ], + "1179571": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 427", + "Section 304A", + "Section 308", + "Section 338", + "Section 299" + ], + "117960890": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 337", + "Section 279", + "Section 338", + "Section 304" + ], + "1179761": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302" + ], + "1179783": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 511" + ], + "118080246": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "118080542": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 342", + "Section 379", + "Section 427", + "Section 341", + "Section 468", + "Section 34", + "Section 397", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 120B", + "Section 506" + ], + "118110630": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 420", + "Section 417", + "Section 109" + ], + "118140951": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 34" + ], + "118148774": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 506" + ], + "118294056": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 395", + "Section 341" + ], + "118400458": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 201", + "Section 364", + "Section 120", + "Section 302", + "Section 363" + ], + "118415352": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 380" + ], + "1183406": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "118343849": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 417" + ], + "1184245": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 341", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 307" + ], + "118440220": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 34", + "Section 468" + ], + "118446910": [ + "Section 143", + "Section 147", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 302" + ], + "118449780": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 366", + "Section 363" + ], + "1184626": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 415", + "Section 467", + "Section 468" + ], + "118914436": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 366A", + "Section 363" + ], + "118919025": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 323", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 3", + "Section 341" + ], + "1189234": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "1189266": [ + "Section 4", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 3", + "Section 120B" + ], + "118929631": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "1189380": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 326", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 465", + "Section 34", + "Section 114", + "Section 304" + ], + "118939965": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 468" + ], + "119016998": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 323", + "Section 504" + ], + "118947726": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 120B" + ], + "118968259": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406" + ], + "118973366": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 294" + ], + "118989414": [ + "Section 511", + "Section 376" + ], + "1189958": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "118241897": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 437" + ], + "1182443": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 302", + "Section 457", + "Section 392" + ], + "1182563": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 397", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 294", + "Section 394", + "Section 457", + "Section 380", + "Section 353", + "Section 323" + ], + "118510908": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1185147": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 313", + "Section 120B", + "Section 326", + "Section 354", + "Section 164", + "Section 109", + "Section 201", + "Section 300", + "Section 465", + "Section 324", + "Section 366" + ], + "118530194": [ + "Section 107", + "Section 468" + ], + "118546755": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 34", + "Section 366", + "Section 156" + ], + "118587089": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 114", + "Section 326", + "Section 392", + "Section 448", + "Section 323", + "Section 482", + "Section 306", + "Section 324" + ], + "118595333": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 120B" + ], + "118600608": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "118601356": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 306", + "Section 437" + ], + "118679925": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 34", + "Section 307" + ], + "118680807": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 504", + "Section 143", + "Section 147", + "Section 149", + "Section 326" + ], + "1186914": [ + "Section 415", + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 482", + "Section 173", + "Section 34" + ], + "118702642": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 471" + ], + "118703": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 149" + ], + "118703205": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 307" + ], + "118704875": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34" + ], + "119107026": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 394", + "Section 307", + "Section 186", + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 342", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "119485201": [ + "Section 190", + "Section 482", + "Section 427", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 452", + "Section 147" + ], + "118623979": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 376" + ], + "118631174": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 34", + "Section 417" + ], + "118855112": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 341", + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 148", + "Section 294" + ], + "1188719": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "118881505": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 366" + ], + "118886733": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 482" + ], + "118912066": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 120B", + "Section 394" + ], + "119212275": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "119213728": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 509", + "Section 308", + "Section 341", + "Section 354", + "Section 325" + ], + "1192327": [ + "Section 190", + "Section 200", + "Section 2", + "Section 323" + ], + "11904250": [ + "Section 384", + "Section 506", + "Section 397", + "Section 341", + "Section 34" + ], + "119053503": [ + "Section 417", + "Section 34", + "Section 376" + ], + "119066253": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 34" + ], + "119067469": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 294" + ], + "119327145": [ + "Section 452" + ], + "119336626": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 3" + ], + "119339385": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406" + ], + "119375722": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 341", + "Section 326", + "Section 325" + ], + "119381631": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 147", + "Section 504", + "Section 149", + "Section 325", + "Section 395", + "Section 143", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 452", + "Section 323", + "Section 353", + "Section 148", + "Section 186" + ], + "1194484": [ + "Section 161" + ], + "119473047": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 304" + ], + "1194787": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 307" + ], + "119534766": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "119540048": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 228" + ], + "119545818": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "119280989": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 320", + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 120B", + "Section 120" + ], + "1192997": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "119320634": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 326" + ], + "1193229": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 304" + ], + "119564010": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294" + ], + "1195744": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 149" + ], + "119582646": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 307" + ], + "119929380": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A" + ], + "119072169": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 452", + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 392", + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 148", + "Section 468", + "Section 149", + "Section 147" + ], + "119088465": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 304B", + "Section 107" + ], + "1190913": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 353", + "Section 147", + "Section 332", + "Section 323" + ], + "119762104": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "119668283": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 436" + ], + "119669022": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 120", + "Section 395" + ], + "119671705": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406" + ], + "1196993": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 120B", + "Section 409", + "Section 467", + "Section 341" + ], + "119783017": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 511" + ], + "119814": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 149", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 147", + "Section 313" + ], + "1198212": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 324" + ], + "119834559": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 506", + "Section 498" + ], + "119841745": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 342" + ], + "120046564": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 341", + "Section 308" + ], + "120052568": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 300", + "Section 323", + "Section 304", + "Section 504", + "Section 299", + "Section 506", + "Section 376" + ], + "120061308": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 438", + "Section 294" + ], + "120065556": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 448" + ], + "120075894": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 420" + ], + "1200841": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 120", + "Section 332", + "Section 143" + ], + "120397926": [ + "Section 364", + "Section 302", + "Section 342" + ], + "1204318": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 397" + ], + "1204457": [ + "Section 279", + "Section 304A" + ], + "120457058": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302" + ], + "120103264": [ + "Section 509" + ], + "1201542": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 228" + ], + "1201688": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 302" + ], + "120176338": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A", + "Section 506", + "Section 354", + "Section 4" + ], + "120204169": [ + "Section 156", + "Section 471", + "Section 120B", + "Section 468", + "Section 420" + ], + "1202193": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 302", + "Section 326", + "Section 504", + "Section 307" + ], + "120921627": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 354", + "Section 323", + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 3" + ], + "120939600": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 506" + ], + "120947188": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 406", + "Section 498A" + ], + "120947661": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302" + ], + "120948945": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366A", + "Section 120B", + "Section 438" + ], + "1207939": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 395", + "Section 397" + ], + "1207975": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 120B", + "Section 161" + ], + "120801606": [ + "Section 494", + "Section 506", + "Section 498", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "120813134": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 448", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "1208137": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 304" + ], + "120838129": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 306", + "Section 34" + ], + "121012973": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 114", + "Section 120B", + "Section 438" + ], + "1210211": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 13" + ], + "1210372": [ + "Section 304A" + ], + "1210886": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 299", + "Section 325", + "Section 149", + "Section 304", + "Section 326" + ], + "12113260": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 436" + ], + "1212446": [ + "Section 332", + "Section 147" + ], + "121251270": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "1212531": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 109", + "Section 201", + "Section 304", + "Section 149", + "Section 336", + "Section 438", + "Section 482", + "Section 148" + ], + "121211985": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "121216347": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "1213298": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 325" + ], + "121641338": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "121670495": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 409", + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 193", + "Section 200", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 228" + ], + "122059695": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 302" + ], + "1220660": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 149" + ], + "1206295": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 299" + ], + "127105026": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 504", + "Section 304" + ], + "127105139": [ + "Section 279", + "Section 482" + ], + "127107230": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 506" + ], + "127124945": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 149", + "Section 326", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 504", + "Section 143", + "Section 147" + ], + "1271682": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 109", + "Section 107", + "Section 120B", + "Section 436" + ], + "121522246": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "121533755": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 437" + ], + "1215381": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 306" + ], + "121552484": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 302" + ], + "121561720": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 392" + ], + "121598425": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "121613343": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "121614607": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 307", + "Section 341" + ], + "121616125": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 109", + "Section 148", + "Section 380" + ], + "121698209": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 188", + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A" + ], + "121710586": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 4", + "Section 120B", + "Section 302", + "Section 326" + ], + "121723729": [ + "Section 155", + "Section 120B" + ], + "1217279": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 326", + "Section 427" + ], + "121728380": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 332", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 149", + "Section 186", + "Section 147" + ], + "1217493": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 34" + ], + "1217502": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 161" + ], + "121638684": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 389", + "Section 366" + ], + "121846468": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 13" + ], + "121927720": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323" + ], + "1222047": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "121893352": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 506", + "Section 294" + ], + "121907516": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 341" + ], + "12191314": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 437", + "Section 186" + ], + "1219720": [ + "Section 415", + "Section 482", + "Section 420", + "Section 34" + ], + "127478356": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 341", + "Section 299", + "Section 326" + ], + "127479853": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 143" + ], + "127489639": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "127490266": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 353", + "Section 341" + ], + "127491001": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 304B", + "Section 304", + "Section 5" + ], + "127493163": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 323" + ], + "1274938": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 427", + "Section 379" + ], + "1219915": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 302" + ], + "122033775": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "12283214": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 415" + ], + "122847342": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "122854079": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 324" + ], + "122511603": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 34" + ], + "12253": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 109", + "Section 376", + "Section 420", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 415", + "Section 2", + "Section 506", + "Section 201" + ], + "122553305": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 109", + "Section 417", + "Section 420", + "Section 3", + "Section 375" + ], + "122297331": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "122299020": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "122311190": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 120B" + ], + "122321843": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 304B", + "Section 306", + "Section 34", + "Section 304", + "Section 354" + ], + "122327405": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 34" + ], + "12232956": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 341", + "Section 438", + "Section 323" + ], + "122331194": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 188", + "Section 109" + ], + "122338298": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 302" + ], + "122339076": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 320", + "Section 376" + ], + "122340970": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 34" + ], + "1223564": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 406" + ], + "122360093": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 364" + ], + "122459574": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 420" + ], + "122633449": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406" + ], + "122560335": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 353" + ], + "122563101": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498", + "Section 323", + "Section 107" + ], + "122573386": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 143", + "Section 341" + ], + "122583340": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 498", + "Section 498A" + ], + "122583390": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 341" + ], + "122590431": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "122610885": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 34", + "Section 482" + ], + "122611459": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "122612903": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 452", + "Section 147", + "Section 302" + ], + "122102362": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 173" + ], + "1221178": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 323", + "Section 304", + "Section 147", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 109" + ], + "122473119": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 366", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "1224840": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "122664230": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 302", + "Section 394" + ], + "1226746": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 324", + "Section 300" + ], + "122727469": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 190" + ], + "122160762": [ + "Section 409" + ], + "122252422": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 364" + ], + "122258988": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 504", + "Section 498A", + "Section 506", + "Section 494", + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 406", + "Section 155", + "Section 156", + "Section 419", + "Section 420", + "Section 468" + ], + "1222631": [ + "Section 494", + "Section 190" + ], + "122973570": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 307" + ], + "122764632": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 323", + "Section 392", + "Section 294" + ], + "12277995": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 306" + ], + "1227808": [ + "Section 389", + "Section 506" + ], + "122331074": [ + "Section 186", + "Section 353", + "Section 332" + ], + "122399": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "12255453": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 302" + ], + "12286238": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 506" + ], + "123363091": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 120" + ], + "122811522": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 511" + ], + "12317419": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 354", + "Section 448", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "123176": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 149", + "Section 323", + "Section 148", + "Section 120B", + "Section 302", + "Section 300" + ], + "123207032": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 354", + "Section 376", + "Section 511" + ], + "123209078": [ + "Section 5" + ], + "123218246": [ + "Section 279", + "Section 304A" + ], + "123227110": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A" + ], + "123072326": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 336", + "Section 504", + "Section 147", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 379" + ], + "123073": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 109", + "Section 406" + ], + "123076747": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 506" + ], + "12308435": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 325", + "Section 294", + "Section 341" + ], + "1231047": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "123328761": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 392", + "Section 34", + "Section 452", + "Section 411" + ], + "123377062": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 506" + ], + "1233787": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "12339126": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 109" + ], + "123411742": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 120B", + "Section 302", + "Section 436", + "Section 427", + "Section 323", + "Section 304", + "Section 452", + "Section 3", + "Section 174A", + "Section 450", + "Section 148", + "Section 325", + "Section 300", + "Section 397", + "Section 395" + ], + "123460493": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 397" + ], + "1234689": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 173", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 482", + "Section 147", + "Section 498A", + "Section 452", + "Section 409", + "Section 504", + "Section 324", + "Section 427" + ], + "123481351": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 341", + "Section 149", + "Section 307" + ], + "123487854": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 107", + "Section 304B", + "Section 498" + ], + "1234898": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 395", + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 389", + "Section 147", + "Section 394", + "Section 392", + "Section 307", + "Section 379", + "Section 397" + ], + "123522193": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107", + "Section 34" + ], + "1236167": [ + "Section 409" + ], + "123620751": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 323" + ], + "123645219": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "12365562": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 324" + ], + "123660783": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 34", + "Section 149" + ], + "123738344": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 452", + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 323" + ], + "123753653": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 354" + ], + "123796451": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 436", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 188", + "Section 302", + "Section 427", + "Section 323", + "Section 201", + "Section 395", + "Section 304", + "Section 143", + "Section 452", + "Section 380", + "Section 326" + ], + "12379861": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 34", + "Section 397" + ], + "123805731": [ + "Section 457", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "1238284": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 313" + ], + "123835040": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 307" + ], + "1238385": [ + "Section 161" + ], + "123841041": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 438", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "123856890": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "124066880": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 506" + ], + "1240860": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302" + ], + "124099719": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "12411725": [ + "Section 173" + ], + "124152667": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 504" + ], + "1241718": [ + "Section 313" + ], + "124177551": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 302", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "124183115": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 324" + ], + "124193177": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "124198002": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 323" + ], + "124223643": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 409", + "Section 120B", + "Section 438", + "Section 467", + "Section 34", + "Section 417" + ], + "1244125": [ + "Section 337", + "Section 279" + ], + "124413666": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 506" + ], + "1244161": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 307" + ], + "1244506": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1244691": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 120B" + ], + "124476012": [ + "Section 452" + ], + "1245006": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 120" + ], + "1245031": [ + "Section 304A" + ], + "124513816": [ + "Section 384", + "Section 342", + "Section 354", + "Section 323" + ], + "124533756": [ + "Section 384", + "Section 342", + "Section 34" + ], + "1245354": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 109" + ], + "124538039": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 365" + ], + "12455090": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "124585564": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "1245959": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 313" + ], + "124676746": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 465", + "Section 468", + "Section 109", + "Section 342", + "Section 506", + "Section 467", + "Section 419", + "Section 323", + "Section 417", + "Section 471", + "Section 341", + "Section 415" + ], + "124681507": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 149", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 326" + ], + "124685208": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 324", + "Section 342", + "Section 394", + "Section 436", + "Section 397" + ], + "124692435": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 506", + "Section 498", + "Section 323", + "Section 13", + "Section 504" + ], + "124697052": [ + "Section 365", + "Section 147" + ], + "124854973": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 452", + "Section 324", + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 323", + "Section 482" + ], + "124867457": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 149", + "Section 306", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304", + "Section 107" + ], + "12487681": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 419" + ], + "124892004": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 341", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 229A", + "Section 420" + ], + "124905348": [ + "Section 436", + "Section 336", + "Section 294" + ], + "124912827": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1249338": [ + "Section 200", + "Section 156" + ], + "124942524": [ + "Section 320", + "Section 498A" + ], + "124975": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 4" + ], + "12505846": [ + "Section 389" + ], + "1250590": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 161", + "Section 363" + ], + "125084733": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 324" + ], + "1250864": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 380", + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 324", + "Section 325", + "Section 149" + ], + "125097177": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "125113392": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 13", + "Section 471", + "Section 465", + "Section 468", + "Section 406" + ], + "125118504": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 471", + "Section 409", + "Section 467", + "Section 468" + ], + "125125710": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 379", + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 427", + "Section 447", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "125134848": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 438", + "Section 34" + ], + "1251433": [ + "Section 313", + "Section 302" + ], + "125143934": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 436", + "Section 452", + "Section 147", + "Section 324" + ], + "125266413": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 394", + "Section 294" + ], + "125274651": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 447", + "Section 379" + ], + "125291029": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467", + "Section 156" + ], + "125435288": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 34", + "Section 324" + ], + "125440785": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 300" + ], + "125292748": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 376" + ], + "1252938": [ + "Section 161" + ], + "125312211": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302" + ], + "125328815": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 320" + ], + "1253304": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 34", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 379" + ], + "125336539": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 342", + "Section 394" + ], + "12535920": [ + "Section 279", + "Section 304A", + "Section 338", + "Section 337", + "Section 389", + "Section 304", + "Section 353" + ], + "125716011": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 324", + "Section 34" + ], + "125733763": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 324" + ], + "125604689": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 506", + "Section 107", + "Section 504", + "Section 406", + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 323" + ], + "125607620": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 420", + "Section 498", + "Section 392", + "Section 468", + "Section 302", + "Section 471" + ], + "12561985": [ + "Section 337", + "Section 279", + "Section 304" + ], + "125632384": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 366A", + "Section 376", + "Section 354" + ], + "12563583": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "125567625": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "125577399": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 34" + ], + "125578085": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363" + ], + "125589660": [ + "Section 375", + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "12559632": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 354", + "Section 506" + ], + "1255997": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 201" + ], + "12560364": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 411", + "Section 379", + "Section 353" + ], + "126413436": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 341" + ], + "126419811": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "12642490": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 308", + "Section 325" + ], + "126433988": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "1260302": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 4", + "Section 397", + "Section 395" + ], + "126032789": [ + "Section 395", + "Section 394" + ], + "126042880": [ + "Section 4", + "Section 5", + "Section 3" + ], + "126052989": [ + "Section 143", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 188", + "Section 186", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "1260547": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 389" + ], + "1259721": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A", + "Section 107" + ], + "1259837": [ + "Section 395" + ], + "1260063": [ + "Section 500" + ], + "126007698": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "126011178": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 394", + "Section 392", + "Section 294", + "Section 341", + "Section 323" + ], + "126012346": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420" + ], + "126172561": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 379", + "Section 419", + "Section 120B", + "Section 465", + "Section 468", + "Section 34" + ], + "1261035": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120", + "Section 415" + ], + "1261450": [ + "Section 161" + ], + "1266901": [ + "Section 364", + "Section 302" + ], + "127286937": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 201", + "Section 34", + "Section 186", + "Section 468", + "Section 471" + ], + "125644831": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 143" + ], + "12565578": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 299", + "Section 307" + ], + "125657512": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A" + ], + "12565946": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 438", + "Section 323", + "Section 354", + "Section 326" + ], + "125662117": [ + "Section 363" + ], + "125683795": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "128401119": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 354" + ], + "1284250": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "1268441": [ + "Section 415" + ], + "126910651": [ + "Section 4", + "Section 420" + ], + "126967336": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 143", + "Section 147" + ], + "126195898": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 323", + "Section 341" + ], + "126212": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 155", + "Section 109", + "Section 156" + ], + "12623793": [ + "Section 365", + "Section 376", + "Section 375", + "Section 366", + "Section 417" + ], + "1263295": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 299", + "Section 304", + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 325" + ], + "1263718": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 307", + "Section 325" + ], + "126375658": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1263837": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 302" + ], + "126387153": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 427", + "Section 149" + ], + "126399": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 149", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 307", + "Section 465" + ], + "126410896": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 354", + "Section 164", + "Section 323" + ], + "1264562": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 450", + "Section 457", + "Section 448", + "Section 300" + ], + "126460653": [ + "Section 299", + "Section 304" + ], + "126466309": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 34", + "Section 498" + ], + "126468386": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "126481074": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 397" + ], + "1264854": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "126521182": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 498A", + "Section 323" + ], + "126542879": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 336", + "Section 395", + "Section 506", + "Section 353", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "1265877": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 384" + ], + "1265961": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302" + ], + "1266773": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 468" + ], + "126682707": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 300" + ], + "126729425": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 465", + "Section 420" + ], + "126751426": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 325", + "Section 452" + ], + "128204520": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 156", + "Section 34", + "Section 190", + "Section 173", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 326" + ], + "1282109": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 506" + ], + "128213542": [ + "Section 397" + ], + "1282148": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "1282159": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "128217275": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 447" + ], + "126771856": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "1268169": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 34" + ], + "126834": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 201", + "Section 13", + "Section 468" + ], + "1268430": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 302" + ], + "126947894": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 302", + "Section 325", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 109" + ], + "126952627": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120", + "Section 420", + "Section 201" + ], + "12696274": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 306" + ], + "126965878": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 294" + ], + "126969972": [ + "Section 415" + ], + "126970298": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 161", + "Section 149" + ], + "126986239": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 354", + "Section 392", + "Section 302", + "Section 411", + "Section 376" + ], + "127009018": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "127009447": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 406" + ], + "1272040": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 304", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 323" + ], + "1272057": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1272227": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "127239778": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 143", + "Section 436", + "Section 438", + "Section 448" + ], + "1272585": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 313", + "Section 307" + ], + "127259375": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 156" + ], + "127263711": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 363", + "Section 376" + ], + "1272664": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304B", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1272681": [ + "Section 120B" + ], + "127270214": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 427", + "Section 114", + "Section 148", + "Section 149" + ], + "127275213": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 448", + "Section 307", + "Section 325", + "Section 164", + "Section 323" + ], + "127279138": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 324" + ], + "1275417": [ + "Section 320", + "Section 420", + "Section 406" + ], + "127558379": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 354", + "Section 323", + "Section 506" + ], + "127530522": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 332", + "Section 353", + "Section 294", + "Section 147", + "Section 437" + ], + "1275356": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 299", + "Section 304", + "Section 313" + ], + "1275745": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 420", + "Section 5", + "Section 120B", + "Section 149", + "Section 468" + ], + "1275754": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 114", + "Section 120", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 338" + ], + "12759395": [ + "Section 375", + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 34", + "Section 376" + ], + "127716521": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 323" + ], + "1277242": [ + "Section 161" + ], + "127727525": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "1277289": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "127777161": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "1278061": [ + "Section 228", + "Section 109", + "Section 107" + ], + "127806273": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A" + ], + "127818763": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 337" + ], + "12782568": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 302", + "Section 120", + "Section 436", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 427", + "Section 201", + "Section 326" + ], + "128129022": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 34", + "Section 397" + ], + "128130603": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 304" + ], + "128137606": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "128151061": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 307", + "Section 326", + "Section 325", + "Section 447" + ], + "128155016": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 353" + ], + "128158284": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 506" + ], + "127917810": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 498A", + "Section 320", + "Section 506" + ], + "127923134": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "1278780": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1278923": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 384", + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 336", + "Section 147", + "Section 448", + "Section 427", + "Section 397" + ], + "1278976": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 302" + ], + "1279011": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "127324773": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 379", + "Section 354", + "Section 308", + "Section 448", + "Section 427", + "Section 34", + "Section 325" + ], + "1273382": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "1276074": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 325", + "Section 326", + "Section 506", + "Section 304" + ], + "12761935": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 324" + ], + "127964352": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 294" + ], + "1279775": [ + "Section 500", + "Section 200" + ], + "128023163": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 143", + "Section 504", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 149", + "Section 395", + "Section 324", + "Section 4", + "Section 341", + "Section 326" + ], + "1280376": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 114", + "Section 324", + "Section 34" + ], + "128053697": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 498A", + "Section 307" + ], + "127495": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 498", + "Section 307" + ], + "127605276": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "127742474": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 394" + ], + "127827057": [ + "Section 364", + "Section 452", + "Section 120B", + "Section 302", + "Section 161", + "Section 201", + "Section 148", + "Section 365" + ], + "127909950": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 419", + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 34", + "Section 120B" + ], + "128227912": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 300" + ], + "1282318": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 306" + ], + "1282404": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 161", + "Section 376" + ], + "128252070": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 325", + "Section 438", + "Section 448", + "Section 506" + ], + "128260": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 323", + "Section 320" + ], + "128264": [ + "Section 120B" + ], + "128267222": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 341", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "1283572": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 148", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 149" + ], + "128358537": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A" + ], + "128377": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 307" + ], + "128386037": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 409", + "Section 120B", + "Section 471" + ], + "128455230": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 384" + ], + "1284652": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 482", + "Section 409", + "Section 406" + ], + "128476874": [ + "Section 500" + ], + "128488483": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 417", + "Section 173", + "Section 190", + "Section 419", + "Section 34", + "Section 200" + ], + "1294958": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1299165": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 450", + "Section 376" + ], + "129832847": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 498" + ], + "129833307": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A" + ], + "130147434": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 406", + "Section 506", + "Section 467", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 156" + ], + "130156808": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 427", + "Section 279" + ], + "130162851": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 120B" + ], + "1301636": [ + "Section 365", + "Section 149", + "Section 366", + "Section 147", + "Section 452", + "Section 342", + "Section 364", + "Section 148" + ], + "128814319": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 304", + "Section 201" + ], + "128879861": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 447", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506" + ], + "1288816": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 325", + "Section 304", + "Section 307", + "Section 299" + ], + "1288857": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 120B", + "Section 161" + ], + "1288901": [ + "Section 161" + ], + "1290891": [ + "Section 415" + ], + "129105809": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 375", + "Section 376", + "Section 498A" + ], + "129107140": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 34", + "Section 306" + ], + "129115615": [ + "Section 143", + "Section 147", + "Section 120B", + "Section 436", + "Section 427", + "Section 173", + "Section 452" + ], + "1290534": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1290641": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 354" + ], + "12907819": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 337", + "Section 338", + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 307", + "Section 279", + "Section 149", + "Section 148" + ], + "129086688": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 120" + ], + "129122958": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 498A", + "Section 307" + ], + "1291324": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 3", + "Section 302" + ], + "129143547": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "129166388": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "129177288": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 325", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 341", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 143" + ], + "1291995": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 304" + ], + "129322648": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 354", + "Section 34" + ], + "129331668": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302" + ], + "129332696": [ + "Section 13" + ], + "129335099": [ + "Section 336", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "1293557": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 438" + ], + "129373853": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "1293749": [ + "Section 436", + "Section 109", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 107", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 324" + ], + "128896724": [ + "Section 308", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 332", + "Section 307", + "Section 353", + "Section 504", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 325", + "Section 149" + ], + "1288972": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 313" + ], + "128898717": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120" + ], + "128909614": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "128915260": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 325", + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A", + "Section 452" + ], + "129540683": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 307" + ], + "129545": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 107" + ], + "129564665": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 325", + "Section 307" + ], + "1295690": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 149" + ], + "129577963": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 325" + ], + "1295782": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 149" + ], + "129517678": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 438", + "Section 448", + "Section 323", + "Section 326" + ], + "129517766": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 452" + ], + "129620596": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 366", + "Section 376", + "Section 307", + "Section 364", + "Section 450" + ], + "129620993": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 34" + ], + "1296255": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302" + ], + "129633366": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "1296644": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 420" + ], + "129672060": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 147" + ], + "129755338": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "129760396": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 506" + ], + "12977511": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "129775198": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 308", + "Section 438", + "Section 506" + ], + "1298071": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 471" + ], + "129903823": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 34", + "Section 307" + ], + "129850188": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 148", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "1298613": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "129885855": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "130091506": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 326", + "Section 307", + "Section 325", + "Section 324", + "Section 300", + "Section 304", + "Section 323" + ], + "130110800": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "130118679": [ + "Section 120B" + ], + "1301360": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 193", + "Section 120" + ], + "130239142": [ + "Section 450", + "Section 506" + ], + "130250327": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 392", + "Section 395", + "Section 394", + "Section 173" + ], + "1302588": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 13", + "Section 120B", + "Section 468" + ], + "130452448": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B" + ], + "130480207": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120" + ], + "130504992": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1302930": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 300" + ], + "1303": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306" + ], + "1303098": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 302" + ], + "130590382": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 34" + ], + "1302241": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "1308968": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 417", + "Section 447", + "Section 376", + "Section 323", + "Section 375" + ], + "1309719": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 354", + "Section 366", + "Section 34" + ], + "13072224": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 397", + "Section 34", + "Section 392", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 353", + "Section 186" + ], + "130637388": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 437", + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "130663290": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 363", + "Section 447", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "130668232": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 354", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "130676453": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 320" + ], + "1303339": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "130360": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 173", + "Section 302" + ], + "130745678": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 294" + ], + "13076": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "130763093": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 325" + ], + "1307638": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 304" + ], + "130799434": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B" + ], + "1310561": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 506", + "Section 304" + ], + "131063673": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 148" + ], + "131097534": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 375", + "Section 364" + ], + "131103631": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 420", + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 397", + "Section 392" + ], + "130395855": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 409", + "Section 500", + "Section 120B" + ], + "1304": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 313", + "Section 164", + "Section 34", + "Section 201", + "Section 379", + "Section 392" + ], + "130414410": [ + "Section 279", + "Section 337" + ], + "1312184": [ + "Section 5", + "Section 164", + "Section 161", + "Section 482", + "Section 471", + "Section 409", + "Section 468", + "Section 420" + ], + "131222480": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 34" + ], + "13122594": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 447", + "Section 471", + "Section 419", + "Section 173", + "Section 468", + "Section 409", + "Section 4" + ], + "131232482": [ + "Section 107", + "Section 306", + "Section 34" + ], + "131165981": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 376" + ], + "131177059": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 354", + "Section 448", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 325" + ], + "131191721": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 34" + ], + "131200021": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 307", + "Section 325", + "Section 511", + "Section 376", + "Section 323" + ], + "131210670": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 366" + ], + "1312126": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "132876537": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "132892099": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 376", + "Section 437" + ], + "132900378": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 504", + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 326", + "Section 325", + "Section 324" + ], + "131249514": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 143" + ], + "131270822": [ + "Section 500", + "Section 120B" + ], + "131272842": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 438", + "Section 448", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 427" + ], + "13127916": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 120", + "Section 376", + "Section 34", + "Section 156" + ], + "131358761": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 307", + "Section 436", + "Section 326", + "Section 324", + "Section 302" + ], + "133094203": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 452", + "Section 511" + ], + "13329615": [ + "Section 511", + "Section 354", + "Section 376", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 34", + "Section 4" + ], + "124898576": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 300" + ], + "1273067": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A", + "Section 114" + ], + "1317389": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 379", + "Section 341", + "Section 336", + "Section 506" + ], + "132571952": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 143", + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 342", + "Section 363" + ], + "131322871": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 465" + ], + "1313349": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 147" + ], + "1313444": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "131559649": [ + "Section 450", + "Section 506", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "13158222": [ + "Section 409" + ], + "131377908": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 465", + "Section 468" + ], + "1313832": [ + "Section 511", + "Section 193" + ], + "13139863": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "131404914": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 465" + ], + "1314061": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "1314237": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 436", + "Section 143" + ], + "131428396": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 13", + "Section 406" + ], + "131436337": [ + "Section 337", + "Section 279" + ], + "131444768": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 420", + "Section 409", + "Section 506", + "Section 342", + "Section 323", + "Section 397" + ], + "131447840": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 471" + ], + "131475532": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 354", + "Section 376", + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 511" + ], + "131481052": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 200" + ], + "131844725": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 354", + "Section 341" + ], + "1318464": [ + "Section 415", + "Section 420", + "Section 417", + "Section 419" + ], + "131848": [ + "Section 5" + ], + "1318580": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 326" + ], + "13185807": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 498A" + ], + "131877535": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 376" + ], + "131639921": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 326", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 307" + ], + "131653245": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 120B", + "Section 228", + "Section 120", + "Section 420" + ], + "131659252": [ + "Section 417", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 465", + "Section 468" + ], + "131662272": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 323", + "Section 326" + ], + "1316663": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "1316717": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 366A", + "Section 366", + "Section 375", + "Section 342", + "Section 313", + "Section 511" + ], + "1316766": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 342", + "Section 324" + ], + "1316802": [ + "Section 500", + "Section 120B", + "Section 107", + "Section 427" + ], + "131697": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "131701036": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 325", + "Section 326" + ], + "1317115": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "131716726": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 307", + "Section 438" + ], + "131726665": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 34", + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 471" + ], + "132393237": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 332", + "Section 148", + "Section 379", + "Section 427", + "Section 326", + "Section 149", + "Section 186" + ], + "132402307": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "13240347": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 506" + ], + "132411912": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 304A" + ], + "132413207": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 320" + ], + "131973961": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 186", + "Section 147", + "Section 325", + "Section 332", + "Section 342", + "Section 427", + "Section 149" + ], + "131979253": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 419" + ], + "131981610": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294" + ], + "1319964": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 420", + "Section 34", + "Section 201" + ], + "132021173": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 34" + ], + "132072669": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 109", + "Section 323", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1320900": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 304" + ], + "132112260": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 323", + "Section 332", + "Section 353", + "Section 186", + "Section 325" + ], + "132125009": [ + "Section 228", + "Section 193" + ], + "132125452": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "132135963": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 323" + ], + "132200337": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 306", + "Section 34", + "Section 107" + ], + "132207": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 500" + ], + "132209051": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "132216053": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "1322309": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "132282668": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 120B", + "Section 302", + "Section 436", + "Section 323", + "Section 427", + "Section 304", + "Section 452", + "Section 174A", + "Section 3", + "Section 148", + "Section 300", + "Section 395", + "Section 397", + "Section 450", + "Section 325" + ], + "132295399": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "132296466": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "132307468": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 304B" + ], + "131886328": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 420", + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "1318926": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 366" + ], + "131911017": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 498A", + "Section 438" + ], + "1324353": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "1324536": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 143", + "Section 173", + "Section 304", + "Section 34" + ], + "132456301": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 5", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "1319537": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "1321539": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 341", + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 147" + ], + "132317175": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 34", + "Section 120B" + ], + "132502533": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 420", + "Section 323" + ], + "13250756": [ + "Section 395" + ], + "132908044": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "132939756": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 409", + "Section 379" + ], + "132943437": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "132535362": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 498A" + ], + "132553579": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1325661": [ + "Section 320", + "Section 326" + ], + "132774": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 307" + ], + "13278274": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 438", + "Section 376" + ], + "132782743": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B" + ], + "132817712": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A", + "Section 323" + ], + "132820048": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366A", + "Section 376", + "Section 366", + "Section 506", + "Section 365" + ], + "132823816": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 326", + "Section 506", + "Section 300", + "Section 299" + ], + "132832492": [ + "Section 120", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1329450": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 323" + ], + "132945379": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 306" + ], + "132958228": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 376", + "Section 294" + ], + "132970634": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 325" + ], + "1329720": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363" + ], + "133007937": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1330219": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "1330427": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 4", + "Section 147" + ], + "1329800": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 336", + "Section 506" + ], + "1329864": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 304", + "Section 323" + ], + "13299031": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 308", + "Section 438", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "1330604": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 294", + "Section 34" + ], + "133062570": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 504", + "Section 34", + "Section 304", + "Section 506" + ], + "13312356": [ + "Section 465", + "Section 471" + ], + "133125405": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 420", + "Section 155", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 302", + "Section 190" + ], + "133126452": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 376" + ], + "133139426": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 201", + "Section 468", + "Section 120B", + "Section 155", + "Section 2", + "Section 299", + "Section 120", + "Section 193", + "Section 156" + ], + "133141610": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 120", + "Section 149" + ], + "1343717": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 147", + "Section 438", + "Section 294", + "Section 332" + ], + "134379763": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 498A", + "Section 307" + ], + "133422325": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "133430627": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 392" + ], + "133434453": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A" + ], + "133437938": [ + "Section 324" + ], + "13379404": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B" + ], + "1334642": [ + "Section 149" + ], + "133753229": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 279" + ], + "1336914": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 147", + "Section 120B" + ], + "1337239": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 498A", + "Section 107", + "Section 406", + "Section 376", + "Section 120B" + ], + "133234979": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 437" + ], + "133257": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 149" + ], + "133974300": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 506" + ], + "133985903": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 354", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "133991788": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 504", + "Section 302", + "Section 3" + ], + "13399703": [ + "Section 336", + "Section 332", + "Section 147" + ], + "134169359": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 201", + "Section 304B", + "Section 302" + ], + "1342125": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 302" + ], + "133515248": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 188", + "Section 148" + ], + "13365871": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 375" + ], + "133739172": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 498A", + "Section 498", + "Section 397" + ], + "133809023": [ + "Section 509", + "Section 506", + "Section 376" + ], + "1339667": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 109" + ], + "134362741": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 34", + "Section 107" + ], + "134277522": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 34", + "Section 498" + ], + "1342950": [ + "Section 494", + "Section 498A", + "Section 417", + "Section 420", + "Section 155", + "Section 156", + "Section 173", + "Section 482", + "Section 304B" + ], + "134122042": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 332" + ], + "134477795": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 500", + "Section 406" + ], + "134499189": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 2", + "Section 147" + ], + "134447305": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 406" + ], + "1344537": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 302" + ], + "134501705": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 394", + "Section 411", + "Section 120B", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 149" + ], + "1345137": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 143" + ], + "134518828": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 341", + "Section 324", + "Section 304", + "Section 300" + ], + "134536": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "13455427": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "134554680": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 307", + "Section 120B", + "Section 506", + "Section 500", + "Section 190", + "Section 471" + ], + "134627367": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 149" + ], + "13464": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 324" + ], + "134649835": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 506", + "Section 324", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 307" + ], + "136569343": [ + "Section 389" + ], + "1347146": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 482" + ], + "134718161": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "134738686": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 341", + "Section 363" + ], + "134743672": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 120B" + ], + "1348044": [ + "Section 107", + "Section 506", + "Section 406" + ], + "134816271": [ + "Section 384", + "Section 438", + "Section 457", + "Section 34" + ], + "13477148": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 147" + ], + "134785263": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 364", + "Section 363", + "Section 354", + "Section 376", + "Section 3", + "Section 300" + ], + "1347880": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 120B" + ], + "1354059": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 409" + ], + "1354136": [ + "Section 384", + "Section 13" + ], + "135420797": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107", + "Section 34" + ], + "135244168": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 143", + "Section 504", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 109", + "Section 332", + "Section 120B", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 149" + ], + "1352483": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 107", + "Section 109" + ], + "1352523": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 302" + ], + "1353734": [ + "Section 313", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 149", + "Section 452", + "Section 148", + "Section 427" + ], + "135381727": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 294", + "Section 34" + ], + "135383897": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 379" + ], + "135484813": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 397", + "Section 34", + "Section 392" + ], + "135492302": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "135493130": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 294" + ], + "135428914": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 342", + "Section 34" + ], + "135433288": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "13543376": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 294" + ], + "135441417": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 34", + "Section 342", + "Section 395", + "Section 366" + ], + "1354508": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 149", + "Section 120B", + "Section 147" + ], + "1354576": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "135472484": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 308", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 34" + ], + "135479549": [ + "Section 4", + "Section 3" + ], + "135545030": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "135555870": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 300", + "Section 304", + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 325" + ], + "1355674": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 304", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "135573998": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 120B", + "Section 120" + ], + "134825300": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 417" + ], + "1348371": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 326" + ], + "134841947": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 376" + ], + "134857332": [ + "Section 465", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 120", + "Section 467", + "Section 161" + ], + "1348618": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 323" + ], + "1348743": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 323", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 148" + ], + "136224769": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 353", + "Section 323", + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 332", + "Section 148", + "Section 336", + "Section 342", + "Section 452" + ], + "13561428": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 164", + "Section 375" + ], + "1356184": [ + "Section 149" + ], + "135619928": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 447" + ], + "135639008": [ + "Section 173", + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 504", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "135639462": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 294", + "Section 323" + ], + "135692653": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 379", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 448" + ], + "135706861": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 438", + "Section 294" + ], + "135855489": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 427", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 341" + ], + "135945471": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 406", + "Section 506" + ], + "135980628": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1359845": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 304", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 161", + "Section 302" + ], + "1360402": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 302", + "Section 452", + "Section 3", + "Section 34" + ], + "136046828": [ + "Section 375", + "Section 376", + "Section 323" + ], + "1355391": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 300" + ], + "1356415": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "135677242": [ + "Section 149" + ], + "1360495": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 120B", + "Section 120", + "Section 114" + ], + "136076031": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 354", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "1360921": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 307" + ], + "136092640": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 409", + "Section 120B", + "Section 109", + "Section 201" + ], + "1361783": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "136178921": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 326", + "Section 147", + "Section 447" + ], + "136179313": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 34", + "Section 438" + ], + "136131063": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 506", + "Section 448", + "Section 323", + "Section 498" + ], + "136143052": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 506", + "Section 509" + ], + "1361495": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 420", + "Section 156", + "Section 173", + "Section 120B", + "Section 5" + ], + "136398827": [ + "Section 155", + "Section 504", + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 156", + "Section 498A" + ], + "136460574": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 304", + "Section 307" + ], + "1364735": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 304" + ], + "136473734": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 379" + ], + "13649203": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 419" + ], + "1365068": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "136510709": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "136581444": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 406", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 294" + ], + "136590340": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 406", + "Section 120B", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1366123": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 161" + ], + "1366137": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 148" + ], + "136615503": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 147", + "Section 149", + "Section 325" + ], + "136616949": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "136621271": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 326" + ], + "13663": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "136732580": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 511" + ], + "136737776": [ + "Section 509", + "Section 323", + "Section 341" + ], + "136834479": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 229A", + "Section 376", + "Section 174A" + ], + "13684101": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 336", + "Section 332" + ], + "1368554": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302" + ], + "1366928": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 325", + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 326" + ], + "1367002": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 302" + ], + "136961": [ + "Section 161" + ], + "1369678": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 419", + "Section 406", + "Section 120B", + "Section 411" + ], + "13697322": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 308", + "Section 324", + "Section 504" + ], + "1369985": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 379", + "Section 392" + ], + "137002778": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "137039037": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 34" + ], + "137039671": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 379" + ], + "137054319": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 498" + ], + "137056241": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 4", + "Section 3" + ], + "137119451": [ + "Section 511", + "Section 506" + ], + "1372586": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B" + ], + "1372638": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "137228452": [ + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "137238419": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 504" + ], + "137243": [ + "Section 389", + "Section 120B", + "Section 409", + "Section 482" + ], + "1369156": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 149" + ], + "137163985": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 341", + "Section 313" + ], + "1375969": [ + "Section 5" + ], + "138003226": [ + "Section 4", + "Section 2", + "Section 3" + ], + "138037145": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 188", + "Section 307", + "Section 147", + "Section 506", + "Section 155" + ], + "137913264": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1379167": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 34" + ], + "1372844": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 406" + ], + "137293089": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 188", + "Section 34", + "Section 186" + ], + "138024077": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 420", + "Section 320" + ], + "138033970": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 376", + "Section 34" + ], + "13749069": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 120B", + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 363" + ], + "1375155": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 304" + ], + "137564099": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "1375982": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "137604369": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "137605351": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 306" + ], + "137626096": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 120B" + ], + "1377036": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 149", + "Section 323", + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 324" + ], + "137705941": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 394" + ], + "1380578": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 409" + ], + "138073543": [ + "Section 336", + "Section 188", + "Section 304A", + "Section 279", + "Section 337", + "Section 304", + "Section 155", + "Section 156", + "Section 338", + "Section 2" + ], + "138077922": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 323" + ], + "137989756": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 406", + "Section 498A" + ], + "137994556": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 353", + "Section 448", + "Section 34" + ], + "1379953": [ + "Section 304A" + ], + "1381291": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 325" + ], + "138161648": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 511" + ], + "138230087": [ + "Section 450", + "Section 307" + ], + "138235625": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 201", + "Section 34" + ], + "138251661": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 326", + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "138259813": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "138262765": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 376" + ], + "138266721": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "138272231": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 438" + ], + "138278493": [ + "Section 465", + "Section 471", + "Section 120B" + ], + "138283758": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "138290233": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 379", + "Section 323", + "Section 427", + "Section 147" + ], + "1383012": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 482", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506" + ], + "138310490": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 304" + ], + "138314077": [ + "Section 389", + "Section 465" + ], + "13831568": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 34", + "Section 107" + ], + "138359507": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 306", + "Section 307", + "Section 326", + "Section 323" + ], + "138360122": [ + "Section 417", + "Section 376" + ], + "138362619": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "138363903": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 326", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 504", + "Section 143", + "Section 147", + "Section 149" + ], + "1383645": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "138372000": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "138658935": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 304", + "Section 504", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 506" + ], + "1386618": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 500" + ], + "138600850": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 353" + ], + "1386127": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 452", + "Section 394", + "Section 325" + ], + "1386244": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 324", + "Section 304", + "Section 34", + "Section 148", + "Section 326" + ], + "1386353": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 308", + "Section 4" + ], + "138648876": [ + "Section 279", + "Section 304A", + "Section 337", + "Section 338" + ], + "138651985": [ + "Section 409" + ], + "139249715": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 498", + "Section 323", + "Section 294", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1381793": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 452" + ], + "138698046": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 419", + "Section 420" + ], + "140383": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 34" + ], + "138738948": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34" + ], + "1387692": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 467", + "Section 471" + ], + "1387726": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 363" + ], + "138786826": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 392" + ], + "1387897": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "138860623": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "138887286": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 299", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 307" + ], + "1389014": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 411", + "Section 457" + ], + "138940857": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 392", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 341" + ], + "138952145": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 498" + ], + "1389565": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 302" + ], + "138983880": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 120B", + "Section 411" + ], + "139005332": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 506", + "Section 498" + ], + "139008026": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "1389707": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 149" + ], + "1389773": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "139069838": [ + "Section 397" + ], + "1390702": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 500" + ], + "1390790": [ + "Section 500" + ], + "139080920": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 406", + "Section 448", + "Section 120B", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "139085801": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 504", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 149" + ], + "139257424": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366A", + "Section 438", + "Section 379", + "Section 34" + ], + "139261494": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 332", + "Section 353", + "Section 188" + ], + "139276764": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 323", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1392780": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 365", + "Section 363" + ], + "139283877": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 419" + ], + "139286230": [ + "Section 509", + "Section 506" + ], + "139299743": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 376", + "Section 511" + ], + "1394551": [ + "Section 500" + ], + "139387123": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 427", + "Section 452", + "Section 354", + "Section 506", + "Section 394", + "Section 504" + ], + "1394108": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 452", + "Section 308" + ], + "139551739": [ + "Section 173", + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 13", + "Section 468", + "Section 120B" + ], + "1395565": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "139519990": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 120B", + "Section 120" + ], + "14046769": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 354" + ], + "140479268": [ + "Section 336", + "Section 341", + "Section 500" + ], + "1404822": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 323" + ], + "1395792": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 149" + ], + "1395896": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 34", + "Section 313", + "Section 304", + "Section 148" + ], + "139593820": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 308", + "Section 34" + ], + "1395947": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 364", + "Section 34" + ], + "139595985": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 143" + ], + "139628409": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 34", + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 147" + ], + "1396341": [ + "Section 308", + "Section 325", + "Section 155", + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 324" + ], + "139640682": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 120B" + ], + "1402611": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 201", + "Section 109" + ], + "140062287": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "140063668": [ + "Section 2", + "Section 411", + "Section 107", + "Section 364", + "Section 3", + "Section 201", + "Section 397" + ], + "140068106": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "140069661": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "140105114": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 307", + "Section 120B" + ], + "1401253": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 409", + "Section 120B", + "Section 392", + "Section 188" + ], + "140136071": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 465", + "Section 467", + "Section 120B", + "Section 468", + "Section 13", + "Section 511", + "Section 419" + ], + "1401403": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 34" + ], + "140151547": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 143" + ], + "140158253": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 341" + ], + "140691346": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 366", + "Section 506" + ], + "140697101": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 427", + "Section 120B", + "Section 482", + "Section 511", + "Section 397" + ], + "1406985": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 498A" + ], + "140722804": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A" + ], + "140733451": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "140741780": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 304" + ], + "140745894": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 506", + "Section 482", + "Section 320" + ], + "140191965": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "140490926": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 307" + ], + "1406903": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 506" + ], + "140824617": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "140898187": [ + "Section 366A", + "Section 120B" + ], + "141023791": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304", + "Section 307" + ], + "1410871": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 397" + ], + "1403187": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 323", + "Section 467" + ], + "140324735": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "1403347": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 397" + ], + "1403485": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 380", + "Section 34", + "Section 482" + ], + "140353219": [ + "Section 229A" + ], + "140357700": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "1413018": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306" + ], + "141310377": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 120B", + "Section 437", + "Section 294", + "Section 336" + ], + "140419148": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 148", + "Section 447", + "Section 324", + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 307" + ], + "140430932": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 452", + "Section 302", + "Section 354" + ], + "140454270": [ + "Section 395", + "Section 397" + ], + "140457386": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 452", + "Section 406", + "Section 323" + ], + "1404645": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 304" + ], + "140498794": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "1405422": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 326" + ], + "140549777": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 366" + ], + "140565564": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "1405732": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 313", + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "140610028": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420" + ], + "140627722": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 498" + ], + "14062888": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 228", + "Section 482", + "Section 397", + "Section 498A", + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 506" + ], + "1406689": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 342", + "Section 323" + ], + "140675022": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 395", + "Section 452" + ], + "140688158": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1406894": [ + "Section 450", + "Section 376", + "Section 452" + ], + "141044497": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 341", + "Section 325", + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 452", + "Section 323" + ], + "141049455": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "140941375": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 452", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A" + ], + "140942277": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1409616": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 300" + ], + "140967246": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 341" + ], + "140969770": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 406", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "140903328": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 438" + ], + "140904459": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "140918801": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 201", + "Section 307", + "Section 427" + ], + "140921393": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 109" + ], + "14092404": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 34" + ], + "140926320": [ + "Section 190", + "Section 506" + ], + "1409395": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "140984953": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 506" + ], + "1409922": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 325" + ], + "141002351": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 307", + "Section 341" + ], + "141003619": [ + "Section 149" + ], + "141084290": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 325" + ], + "141419629": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 120" + ], + "142832026": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 427" + ], + "141360232": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 506" + ], + "143252840": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "141397371": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 193", + "Section 465", + "Section 188", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 341", + "Section 500" + ], + "141399750": [ + "Section 365", + "Section 307", + "Section 364", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "141543842": [ + "Section 511", + "Section 365" + ], + "1415845": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 324" + ], + "141597410": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 394", + "Section 186" + ], + "140834578": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 506" + ], + "140852518": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 354", + "Section 341", + "Section 438", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "140863405": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 379", + "Section 447", + "Section 384", + "Section 120B", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 427", + "Section 504", + "Section 448" + ], + "141451685": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 201", + "Section 120B", + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "141489616": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "141717273": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 376" + ], + "141748525": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 306", + "Section 498A", + "Section 161" + ], + "143536440": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 397", + "Section 392" + ], + "143539001": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 498A", + "Section 437", + "Section 438", + "Section 34" + ], + "143550119": [ + "Section 389", + "Section 332", + "Section 294" + ], + "143554934": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 325" + ], + "141821260": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 325" + ], + "141836894": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 448", + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 186" + ], + "141864068": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 438" + ], + "141869705": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 34" + ], + "14187203": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "141925908": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 332", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 149", + "Section 186" + ], + "141940215": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 326", + "Section 304", + "Section 323" + ], + "141978138": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 365", + "Section 34", + "Section 438" + ], + "1419989": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 304B", + "Section 302", + "Section 498A" + ], + "142054352": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 506", + "Section 509", + "Section 500" + ], + "142077447": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "142083036": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 34" + ], + "1421576": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "142164689": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 332", + "Section 186", + "Section 353" + ], + "142182016": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 34", + "Section 447", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 506" + ], + "1533686": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 354", + "Section 509", + "Section 3", + "Section 506" + ], + "1423838": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "142388584": [ + "Section 494" + ], + "1423899": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 448", + "Section 323", + "Section 341" + ], + "142324899": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 149" + ], + "142330118": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 323" + ], + "14237660": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 120B" + ], + "1423769": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 326", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 307" + ], + "142379102": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506" + ], + "14237971": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "142380336": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "14244095": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "142458971": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 147", + "Section 341", + "Section 447" + ], + "142469582": [ + "Section 338", + "Section 336", + "Section 34" + ], + "14247467": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 34", + "Section 354" + ], + "1424759": [ + "Section 5" + ], + "1424875": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 161" + ], + "142534412": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107", + "Section 307" + ], + "142535343": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 324", + "Section 109", + "Section 332", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 380", + "Section 307" + ], + "142549": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 363", + "Section 324" + ], + "142564487": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302" + ], + "1425656": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 498A", + "Section 200", + "Section 500" + ], + "14257221": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 406" + ], + "1425791": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 120B" + ], + "1425792": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1425841": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 397", + "Section 392" + ], + "142588615": [ + "Section 364", + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "142594847": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 3" + ], + "142923691": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "1429243": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "142926943": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 114" + ], + "142929205": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 409", + "Section 161", + "Section 120B", + "Section 471", + "Section 465" + ], + "142931183": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 392", + "Section 34" + ], + "142725680": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 342", + "Section 324", + "Section 379" + ], + "1427428": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 326", + "Section 34", + "Section 304", + "Section 323" + ], + "142744598": [ + "Section 228", + "Section 193" + ], + "142750025": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 201", + "Section 109" + ], + "142753202": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "1427606": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "142765545": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "142890": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 326" + ], + "1428935": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120B" + ], + "1429015": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 324", + "Section 304" + ], + "142906": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 120", + "Section 302", + "Section 366", + "Section 419", + "Section 468", + "Section 34", + "Section 364", + "Section 465", + "Section 471", + "Section 384", + "Section 342", + "Section 201", + "Section 406", + "Section 313" + ], + "142913775": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 294" + ], + "1428689": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1429479": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 325", + "Section 302", + "Section 148" + ], + "142963002": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 420", + "Section 155", + "Section 156" + ], + "142964338": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 120", + "Section 506", + "Section 504" + ], + "142975658": [ + "Section 364", + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "142977701": [ + "Section 366A", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 120B", + "Section 363" + ], + "142988027": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "14299467": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 448", + "Section 193", + "Section 5", + "Section 3", + "Section 2" + ], + "14302440": [ + "Section 143", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 342", + "Section 147", + "Section 313" + ], + "143025766": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 304B", + "Section 34" + ], + "143033905": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 120", + "Section 120B", + "Section 511" + ], + "1430863": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 149", + "Section 380", + "Section 436", + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 114", + "Section 147", + "Section 148" + ], + "143666943": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "1432936": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "143299667": [ + "Section 2", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 465" + ], + "1433219": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 420" + ], + "143322000": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294" + ], + "14334593": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 498", + "Section 366" + ], + "1433495": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 468" + ], + "143418093": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 427", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 436", + "Section 438" + ], + "14344599": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 397", + "Section 34", + "Section 392" + ], + "1436963": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 326", + "Section 450", + "Section 304", + "Section 120B", + "Section 148", + "Section 307" + ], + "143703365": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 302" + ], + "1437233": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "143724439": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 307" + ], + "14372584": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 427", + "Section 436" + ], + "143742146": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 323", + "Section 365" + ], + "143746138": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "1437470": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 302" + ], + "1434480": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 326" + ], + "143481290": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "143778660": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "143996154": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 365", + "Section 120B", + "Section 156" + ], + "143886753": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 149" + ], + "143888389": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 354", + "Section 307", + "Section 341", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "143971466": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 366" + ], + "143979962": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 120B", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 415", + "Section 156", + "Section 467", + "Section 506", + "Section 384", + "Section 504" + ], + "1440221": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302" + ], + "1440243": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 109" + ], + "144044605": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 323", + "Section 364", + "Section 342", + "Section 457", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 149", + "Section 201", + "Section 120B", + "Section 406", + "Section 308" + ], + "144055697": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "1440610": [ + "Section 494", + "Section 406", + "Section 498A", + "Section 173" + ], + "1442280": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "14423012": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "144241655": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 307" + ], + "144247376": [ + "Section 229A" + ], + "144251122": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 147", + "Section 336", + "Section 302", + "Section 148" + ], + "144254411": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 366A" + ], + "1442737": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "144278000": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 323", + "Section 304B", + "Section 504", + "Section 34" + ], + "144310775": [ + "Section 509", + "Section 498A", + "Section 307", + "Section 498" + ], + "1438339": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 511", + "Section 375", + "Section 354", + "Section 366", + "Section 306", + "Section 302", + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 325", + "Section 509" + ], + "1438557": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 149", + "Section 323", + "Section 302", + "Section 313", + "Section 300", + "Section 326" + ], + "144435727": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 364", + "Section 120" + ], + "144448132": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 509" + ], + "144461816": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 120B" + ], + "1444778": [ + "Section 417", + "Section 302", + "Section 376", + "Section 323", + "Section 447", + "Section 375", + "Section 397", + "Section 395" + ], + "1445040": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 307" + ], + "144625328": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 379", + "Section 438" + ], + "1446370": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 406", + "Section 498A", + "Section 173", + "Section 155", + "Section 156" + ], + "144637028": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 164", + "Section 161" + ], + "1446448": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "144389674": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "144394851": [ + "Section 409" + ], + "144396236": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 394", + "Section 34", + "Section 397" + ], + "144414042": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 326", + "Section 147", + "Section 447" + ], + "144513809": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "144515847": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 366" + ], + "1445354": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1445805": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 395", + "Section 173", + "Section 228" + ], + "14458059": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1447241": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 326", + "Section 324", + "Section 120B", + "Section 148" + ], + "1447295": [ + "Section 161" + ], + "1447406": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 302" + ], + "144744479": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "14475800": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 436", + "Section 427", + "Section 438", + "Section 323" + ], + "144792948": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "144826979": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 354", + "Section 325" + ], + "144829": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 307", + "Section 325", + "Section 452", + "Section 3", + "Section 376", + "Section 411" + ], + "144832108": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 34", + "Section 307" + ], + "1448569": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "144869069": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 341" + ], + "144425482": [ + "Section 364", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 120", + "Section 325" + ], + "144509442": [ + "Section 4", + "Section 3" + ], + "144721699": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 438", + "Section 325", + "Section 326" + ], + "144933082": [ + "Section 308", + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 323" + ], + "1449398": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "14505744": [ + "Section 419", + "Section 323", + "Section 376", + "Section 342", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 511", + "Section 392" + ], + "1450585": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 364", + "Section 4" + ], + "145000146": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 417" + ], + "1450065": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 304", + "Section 326" + ], + "145019901": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "145033268": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "147037981": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 379", + "Section 148", + "Section 326", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 448" + ], + "147042688": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 363" + ], + "147051799": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 380", + "Section 452", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 427", + "Section 320" + ], + "1470518": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 354" + ], + "145072893": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 509", + "Section 366", + "Section 506" + ], + "1452120": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 506", + "Section 342", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "145226617": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "1454156": [ + "Section 201" + ], + "145419628": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 34" + ], + "145439846": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 294" + ], + "145485784": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 342" + ], + "1455097": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 397" + ], + "145510768": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 379", + "Section 354", + "Section 325" + ], + "1455236": [ + "Section 120", + "Section 302" + ], + "1455274": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 342", + "Section 354" + ], + "145589035": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 436", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 504", + "Section 506" + ], + "145606524": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 323" + ], + "14564011": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 448", + "Section 354", + "Section 326" + ], + "145096546": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "1451184": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 471", + "Section 419", + "Section 120B", + "Section 465" + ], + "1451276": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "145135454": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 304B" + ], + "146054224": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 120B", + "Section 147" + ], + "146054532": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 467", + "Section 120", + "Section 420", + "Section 409", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 120B", + "Section 228", + "Section 34" + ], + "14606359": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 420", + "Section 313" + ], + "146064906": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 120B", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 420" + ], + "146077216": [ + "Section 173" + ], + "145998411": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 494" + ], + "1459995": [ + "Section 332", + "Section 294" + ], + "146007123": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506" + ], + "1460234": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "1460353": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 304", + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "146044092": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 326" + ], + "146045597": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 13", + "Section 109", + "Section 149" + ], + "1460822": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "146091136": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498" + ], + "146114187": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 323", + "Section 498A" + ], + "146125774": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 342", + "Section 494", + "Section 313", + "Section 366", + "Section 323", + "Section 376" + ], + "146128926": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 147", + "Section 448", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "1461398": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 325", + "Section 304", + "Section 323" + ], + "146146755": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 354" + ], + "146162416": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 186", + "Section 341" + ], + "146166150": [ + "Section 389", + "Section 450" + ], + "1461756": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 498" + ], + "146190162": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "145720807": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 326" + ], + "145692080": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 120B", + "Section 188", + "Section 148", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "145717113": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 34" + ], + "146320757": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "146325208": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 506", + "Section 406" + ], + "146327437": [ + "Section 447", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 324" + ], + "1463515": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 307" + ], + "146384287": [ + "Section 188" + ], + "146441849": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 409", + "Section 467" + ], + "146445536": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 354" + ], + "1464467": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 324" + ], + "146446873": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 313", + "Section 341", + "Section 326" + ], + "1464701": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 304" + ], + "146470158": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 336", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 156", + "Section 308", + "Section 324", + "Section 452" + ], + "146483752": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 34" + ], + "1464860": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 417", + "Section 109", + "Section 114", + "Section 34", + "Section 415" + ], + "1464931": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 300" + ], + "146723252": [ + "Section 2", + "Section 394", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 3", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 392", + "Section 13" + ], + "146724": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 500" + ], + "1466893": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 307" + ], + "146711324": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 304B", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 341", + "Section 448", + "Section 506", + "Section 120B" + ], + "14694237": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 448", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "146950975": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 457" + ], + "1469567": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "146964259": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 34", + "Section 120", + "Section 302", + "Section 4" + ], + "146976563": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 417", + "Section 307", + "Section 326", + "Section 325", + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "1470200": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "1470704": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 406" + ], + "1471060": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 323" + ], + "147146019": [ + "Section 337", + "Section 338", + "Section 279" + ], + "147150047": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 342", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 324", + "Section 147" + ], + "147160666": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 155", + "Section 506", + "Section 482", + "Section 156" + ], + "147160800": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 332", + "Section 353", + "Section 186", + "Section 341" + ], + "147166418": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "147171164": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A", + "Section 107", + "Section 34", + "Section 304B" + ], + "147177070": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "147254410": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 201" + ], + "147261436": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 294" + ], + "147284131": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 299" + ], + "147284513": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 294" + ], + "147296043": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "147565487": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "1475702": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 394", + "Section 302" + ], + "14758037": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 392", + "Section 34" + ], + "147594394": [ + "Section 509", + "Section 448", + "Section 506" + ], + "147622548": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "147385014": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 468" + ], + "147318363": [ + "Section 409" + ], + "1473373": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 34", + "Section 201", + "Section 364" + ], + "147339531": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 149", + "Section 300" + ], + "147783176": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 364", + "Section 506", + "Section 511" + ], + "148105773": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "14812604": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 498A", + "Section 320" + ], + "148137355": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 427", + "Section 397", + "Section 506" + ], + "148140510": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 308", + "Section 427", + "Section 448", + "Section 34" + ], + "1481508": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 306", + "Section 201", + "Section 34" + ], + "148153675": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "1481548": [ + "Section 511", + "Section 420", + "Section 419", + "Section 120B", + "Section 468", + "Section 465", + "Section 471" + ], + "148175437": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 353" + ], + "148180625": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 366" + ], + "1481813": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A", + "Section 307", + "Section 304B" + ], + "148196110": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 294", + "Section 186" + ], + "1482510": [ + "Section 164" + ], + "147714899": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 354" + ], + "147463837": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 294" + ], + "147466202": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "1478340": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 409" + ], + "147835": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "147839913": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 34" + ], + "147845902": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 465", + "Section 420" + ], + "147848133": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 201" + ], + "148307018": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "148311473": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 186", + "Section 324", + "Section 353", + "Section 326" + ], + "148312": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "14832089": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 323" + ], + "148348317": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 364", + "Section 120B" + ], + "148351586": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 354", + "Section 506", + "Section 379", + "Section 326" + ], + "148351887": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 201" + ], + "1484068": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 392", + "Section 397", + "Section 376" + ], + "148410575": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 201" + ], + "148412004": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 376" + ], + "148431247": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1484313": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 511", + "Section 375" + ], + "148437108": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 3", + "Section 366", + "Section 376" + ], + "148449156": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "1484588": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 299" + ], + "148460462": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 34" + ], + "1484669": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 107", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 320" + ], + "148470381": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 342", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "148471036": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 364", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 504" + ], + "148599652": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "148601464": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "148606697": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "1486240": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 482", + "Section 155", + "Section 415", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 173", + "Section 120", + "Section 120B", + "Section 156" + ], + "148568779": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 326" + ], + "1485779": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 120B" + ], + "148583164": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "148587537": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 3", + "Section 324" + ], + "148633190": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 511" + ], + "148638": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 406", + "Section 120B" + ], + "148647971": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 148", + "Section 186" + ], + "148653576": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 149" + ], + "148672310": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 406", + "Section 323", + "Section 498A", + "Section 438" + ], + "148677633": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "148677924": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 323" + ], + "148937093": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "148937890": [ + "Section 173", + "Section 307", + "Section 511", + "Section 376", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 498A" + ], + "148948784": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 342", + "Section 452" + ], + "148232248": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "148301841": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 438" + ], + "1484281": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 394" + ], + "148631415": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 34", + "Section 447", + "Section 438", + "Section 323", + "Section 354", + "Section 326" + ], + "148688490": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "1488423": [ + "Section 452" + ], + "149080090": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 452", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 506", + "Section 147", + "Section 363" + ], + "149264298": [ + "Section 482" + ], + "149064231": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 304B" + ], + "148994725": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 341", + "Section 392" + ], + "149009503": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 143" + ], + "149018985": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "1490198": [ + "Section 120B" + ], + "148851745": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 34", + "Section 341", + "Section 379", + "Section 155", + "Section 504", + "Section 482", + "Section 156" + ], + "148861265": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 376", + "Section 107" + ], + "148771064": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 395" + ], + "148776173": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "148776589": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294", + "Section 376" + ], + "14879167": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 354", + "Section 326", + "Section 325", + "Section 427", + "Section 448", + "Section 380", + "Section 452", + "Section 34" + ], + "148810451": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "148821868": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1488324": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 304" + ], + "148894543": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 465", + "Section 467" + ], + "148909303": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A" + ], + "148977868": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "149095086": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 34", + "Section 406", + "Section 498A", + "Section 320" + ], + "149099941": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 326", + "Section 395", + "Section 149", + "Section 325", + "Section 324", + "Section 379", + "Section 143" + ], + "149103438": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 336", + "Section 302", + "Section 436", + "Section 427" + ], + "1491151": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 173", + "Section 149", + "Section 120B", + "Section 148", + "Section 482" + ], + "149132882": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 504" + ], + "14915905": [ + "Section 365", + "Section 394", + "Section 452" + ], + "1491957": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 149", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 120B", + "Section 436", + "Section 147", + "Section 307", + "Section 161" + ], + "14925119": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "1492555": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 353", + "Section 147", + "Section 341" + ], + "149258700": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376" + ], + "149293202": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 323" + ], + "1495077": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "14951": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "149479305": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 354", + "Section 447", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "149480": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "149480668": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 34" + ], + "149488245": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 354", + "Section 506", + "Section 511", + "Section 375" + ], + "149431128": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 397", + "Section 34" + ], + "149437900": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 353", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 326", + "Section 186", + "Section 325", + "Section 436", + "Section 307", + "Section 411", + "Section 332", + "Section 427", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 120", + "Section 506" + ], + "150112676": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 406", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "150154140": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 143", + "Section 341", + "Section 447", + "Section 326", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 504" + ], + "1501554": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 109", + "Section 120B", + "Section 147", + "Section 149", + "Section 114", + "Section 148" + ], + "149540286": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 193", + "Section 34", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "149545814": [ + "Section 279", + "Section 326", + "Section 325" + ], + "1495607": [ + "Section 4", + "Section 326", + "Section 3", + "Section 148" + ], + "149578950": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 397" + ], + "14957955": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 34" + ], + "149587483": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 34", + "Section 420", + "Section 406" + ], + "1496005": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "149610215": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 326" + ], + "149640846": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1496509": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 332", + "Section 353" + ], + "149668085": [ + "Section 409" + ], + "149668700": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 34" + ], + "149718640": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 415" + ], + "149820338": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 354", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 307", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 341", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "149826853": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "1497766": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "149783122": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 376", + "Section 511" + ], + "149791970": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 304", + "Section 448", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "149793817": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 337", + "Section 504", + "Section 148", + "Section 34", + "Section 143", + "Section 324" + ], + "149797163": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 161", + "Section 471" + ], + "149813307": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 506", + "Section 363" + ], + "1498181": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 5" + ], + "150270776": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 147", + "Section 506" + ], + "150455365": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 34", + "Section 417" + ], + "150458212": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "150462": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 376", + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 34" + ], + "150472": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 300", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 148" + ], + "149857080": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "149860171": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 427", + "Section 148", + "Section 332", + "Section 307", + "Section 353", + "Section 147", + "Section 186", + "Section 325" + ], + "1498836": [ + "Section 494", + "Section 406" + ], + "149923361": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 506", + "Section 384", + "Section 34" + ], + "149948796": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "149959754": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 494", + "Section 107" + ], + "150403537": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 143", + "Section 341", + "Section 427", + "Section 323", + "Section 325" + ], + "1505410": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 364", + "Section 365", + "Section 34" + ], + "150225173": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "150226168": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "150289766": [ + "Section 395", + "Section 392" + ], + "150294168": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 313", + "Section 498A", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 34" + ], + "150298582": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 120", + "Section 506" + ], + "150307241": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 504", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 149" + ], + "1503144": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 365", + "Section 366", + "Section 34" + ], + "15031855": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 294" + ], + "1503228": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 397" + ], + "15037": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 299", + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 307" + ], + "150376548": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 511", + "Section 375", + "Section 342", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 354" + ], + "1503804": [ + "Section 161" + ], + "150486120": [ + "Section 452" + ], + "150492471": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 354", + "Section 323", + "Section 342" + ], + "150520001": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 437" + ], + "1505224": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 384" + ], + "150233947": [ + "Section 436", + "Section 506" + ], + "1502381": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 149" + ], + "1502418": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 342" + ], + "1502429": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 306" + ], + "150243610": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "150431087": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 452", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1506314": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 415" + ], + "150633851": [ + "Section 193" + ], + "150636809": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "150644861": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 174A", + "Section 308", + "Section 229A", + "Section 34" + ], + "1505859": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120B" + ], + "150590652": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 190" + ], + "150598032": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 465", + "Section 467" + ], + "1506133": [ + "Section 500", + "Section 482", + "Section 397" + ], + "151293333": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 437" + ], + "151304132": [ + "Section 500", + "Section 120", + "Section 34" + ], + "151306507": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 294" + ], + "1508167": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 302" + ], + "150817154": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "150819546": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A" + ], + "150966223": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 332", + "Section 438", + "Section 427", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 186" + ], + "1509829": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 304", + "Section 148", + "Section 34", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 324" + ], + "150985035": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107" + ], + "150989611": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 394" + ], + "1509370": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "150939557": [ + "Section 229A" + ], + "150953328": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 193", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 323", + "Section 448", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 354", + "Section 467", + "Section 200", + "Section 482" + ], + "150651268": [ + "Section 384", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 34", + "Section 120" + ], + "1506607": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 325", + "Section 324", + "Section 147", + "Section 304", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 452" + ], + "150672412": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 304A", + "Section 420", + "Section 300", + "Section 299", + "Section 506", + "Section 504" + ], + "1506782": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 500" + ], + "150702724": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 471" + ], + "151007577": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 326", + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "151013687": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 366", + "Section 5" + ], + "1511046": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 302" + ], + "151108450": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 380" + ], + "151134290": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 120" + ], + "151142015": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 34" + ], + "1508460": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 5" + ], + "150860765": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294", + "Section 34" + ], + "151057768": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 186" + ], + "151069095": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "151276118": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 365", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 392", + "Section 364", + "Section 148", + "Section 397", + "Section 109" + ], + "15127955": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 323" + ], + "151318773": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "151335740": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "151350421": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 201", + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 465", + "Section 468", + "Section 161", + "Section 420" + ], + "151383228": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 468" + ], + "151391934": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 354" + ], + "151405579": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "151463074": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "151464361": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 452", + "Section 320", + "Section 324" + ], + "151465151": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 302" + ], + "151468802": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 447", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 409", + "Section 379" + ], + "151523061": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 353", + "Section 143", + "Section 427" + ], + "1515299": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 120B", + "Section 161", + "Section 302" + ], + "151537519": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 294", + "Section 506" + ], + "151570865": [ + "Section 363" + ], + "15173277": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 120", + "Section 147" + ], + "151679099": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 427", + "Section 452", + "Section 147", + "Section 325", + "Section 149" + ], + "151680455": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 306", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1516872": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302" + ], + "151936825": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 306", + "Section 304", + "Section 504", + "Section 354", + "Section 452" + ], + "151952": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 467", + "Section 409", + "Section 326", + "Section 420", + "Section 306", + "Section 308", + "Section 302" + ], + "152920288": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 294" + ], + "152924780": [ + "Section 143", + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 186" + ], + "153085869": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 308", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "15309054": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 324" + ], + "153100636": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 366" + ], + "153247895": [ + "Section 143", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 427", + "Section 332", + "Section 186", + "Section 34" + ], + "153251": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 302" + ], + "151760556": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 341", + "Section 307" + ], + "151784475": [ + "Section 299", + "Section 302", + "Section 450", + "Section 323", + "Section 452", + "Section 320", + "Section 341" + ], + "1518013": [ + "Section 186", + "Section 342" + ], + "151801516": [ + "Section 365", + "Section 354", + "Section 447", + "Section 448", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "151802184": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 34" + ], + "1521079": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 326", + "Section 506", + "Section 324" + ], + "152170176": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 320", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 406" + ], + "152190546": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 364", + "Section 161", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 341", + "Section 323" + ], + "152192827": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120" + ], + "152193376": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 156" + ], + "1521945": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 511" + ], + "152224273": [ + "Section 155", + "Section 34", + "Section 156", + "Section 498A", + "Section 482" + ], + "1522642": [ + "Section 308", + "Section 323", + "Section 304", + "Section 324", + "Section 34" + ], + "152277849": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 34", + "Section 164", + "Section 498A" + ], + "152307165": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 506", + "Section 326" + ], + "152323157": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "1523265": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "152328400": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "152333849": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 438" + ], + "153133371": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 34" + ], + "152433381": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 447", + "Section 307", + "Section 448", + "Section 509", + "Section 120B", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 326" + ], + "1524596": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 468", + "Section 302", + "Section 467" + ], + "152464": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "152481117": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 363", + "Section 364", + "Section 376", + "Section 511" + ], + "152590597": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 34" + ], + "1525913": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 147", + "Section 313", + "Section 148", + "Section 149" + ], + "152596235": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 506" + ], + "15254194": [ + "Section 229A" + ], + "152565705": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 279", + "Section 338" + ], + "152625822": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 389" + ], + "152630267": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 326", + "Section 201" + ], + "152640883": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 419", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 409" + ], + "1526473": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "152650737": [ + "Section 436", + "Section 427", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 294", + "Section 147", + "Section 149" + ], + "152652858": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "1526536": [ + "Section 149" + ], + "152666660": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 452" + ], + "152668522": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 341" + ], + "1527099": [ + "Section 188" + ], + "152713247": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 379" + ], + "1527219": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 326", + "Section 313" + ], + "152733670": [ + "Section 304B" + ], + "152740119": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 427", + "Section 337", + "Section 279" + ], + "15275226": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 323", + "Section 3", + "Section 173" + ], + "152885711": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B" + ], + "152889627": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 427", + "Section 323", + "Section 201" + ], + "152892373": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 34", + "Section 506" + ], + "152976062": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 394" + ], + "152998739": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 120", + "Section 342", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "152999302": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 354", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 452" + ], + "153013769": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 376" + ], + "153014716": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "153016701": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 307", + "Section 336", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 380", + "Section 457" + ], + "153055402": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306" + ], + "153075839": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "153077756": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 120B", + "Section 13" + ], + "1530796": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 417", + "Section 120B", + "Section 420" + ], + "153305": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 506" + ], + "153319170": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "153333100": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A", + "Section 313", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 376", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1533890": [ + "Section 5" + ], + "15343513": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 3", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 342" + ], + "153435841": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 341" + ], + "153438355": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 376", + "Section 511", + "Section 307", + "Section 174A" + ], + "1534452": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 326" + ], + "153550041": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 406", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 320" + ], + "153550707": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 323", + "Section 304B", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "153553654": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 302", + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 201", + "Section 304", + "Section 366" + ], + "153559824": [ + "Section 149" + ], + "1535670": [ + "Section 186", + "Section 436" + ], + "153512659": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 354", + "Section 447", + "Section 307", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "1527800": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 395", + "Section 392" + ], + "152783216": [ + "Section 417", + "Section 506", + "Section 376" + ], + "15278430": [ + "Section 338", + "Section 341" + ], + "1528048": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 376", + "Section 511" + ], + "1536116": [ + "Section 201" + ], + "1536178": [ + "Section 511", + "Section 384" + ], + "1537309": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 320", + "Section 342" + ], + "153691": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1537019": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 379", + "Section 353", + "Section 34" + ], + "153707498": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "153708433": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304B", + "Section 306", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304" + ], + "1537124": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302" + ], + "1537475": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 300", + "Section 302" + ], + "153752941": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 342" + ], + "153762284": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 397" + ], + "153762603": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 341", + "Section 379", + "Section 3", + "Section 307" + ], + "153767579": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 294", + "Section 34" + ], + "153768415": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 325", + "Section 147" + ], + "1537788": [ + "Section 450", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 376" + ], + "1537870": [ + "Section 120", + "Section 482", + "Section 324", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 109", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "153949553": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 438", + "Section 506" + ], + "153964438": [ + "Section 155", + "Section 156", + "Section 447", + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 392", + "Section 34" + ], + "1539886": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "153597150": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 4" + ], + "1543052": [ + "Section 395" + ], + "154432509": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B" + ], + "154443923": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 406", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1543443": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 304", + "Section 109", + "Section 342", + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "154350889": [ + "Section 494" + ], + "154358293": [ + "Section 436", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 147" + ], + "1543603": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 324", + "Section 342", + "Section 320" + ], + "1543752": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 147", + "Section 427", + "Section 326", + "Section 120B", + "Section 395", + "Section 397", + "Section 325", + "Section 409" + ], + "154376611": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 452", + "Section 148", + "Section 395", + "Section 397", + "Section 307", + "Section 147" + ], + "154312714": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "1543260": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 465" + ], + "154330000": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 506", + "Section 376" + ], + "1543328": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 34" + ], + "1543899": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 34" + ], + "154394903": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 149", + "Section 304", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 324" + ], + "154398830": [ + "Section 366A", + "Section 376", + "Section 366" + ], + "154049154": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "154049599": [ + "Section 389" + ], + "1540511": [ + "Section 409" + ], + "154497382": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "154449690": [ + "Section 366" + ], + "154450226": [ + "Section 409" + ], + "154462684": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 120B", + "Section 302", + "Section 164", + "Section 376" + ], + "155431016": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 354" + ], + "155447116": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "155455994": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 354", + "Section 307", + "Section 341", + "Section 438", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "15454484": [ + "Section 511", + "Section 364", + "Section 120B", + "Section 326" + ], + "1545792": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 3" + ], + "154646541": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 164" + ], + "154657976": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 34", + "Section 366" + ], + "1546605": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 452", + "Section 324", + "Section 506" + ], + "1546651": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 409", + "Section 420" + ], + "1546664": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 120B", + "Section 323" + ], + "1548938": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 395", + "Section 304", + "Section 397", + "Section 376", + "Section 307", + "Section 325", + "Section 3", + "Section 324", + "Section 452", + "Section 411" + ], + "1548995": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 465", + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 419" + ], + "154904979": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 201", + "Section 438" + ], + "154910163": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 363", + "Section 366A" + ], + "1549301": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 313", + "Section 307" + ], + "154940899": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "1549448": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 420", + "Section 34", + "Section 415", + "Section 107" + ], + "1549545": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 326", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 304", + "Section 109", + "Section 147" + ], + "154955496": [ + "Section 417", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 34", + "Section 420", + "Section 409" + ], + "154963584": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "1549736": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "154706468": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 341" + ], + "1547303": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 304", + "Section 313" + ], + "155174812": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 294", + "Section 307" + ], + "155199616": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "155199899": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "155201184": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "1551117": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 307" + ], + "155116835": [ + "Section 363" + ], + "155122802": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 379" + ], + "155132498": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 34", + "Section 500", + "Section 173" + ], + "155364869": [ + "Section 511", + "Section 306", + "Section 420", + "Section 498A", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 457", + "Section 366", + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 482", + "Section 376" + ], + "155365510": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 420", + "Section 468" + ], + "155376852": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A" + ], + "155654019": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "155412352": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 509" + ], + "155418896": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "155468092": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 364", + "Section 379", + "Section 149", + "Section 120", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "155498489": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 506" + ], + "1555053": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "1555247": [ + "Section 494", + "Section 379" + ], + "155533618": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "155577614": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 419" + ], + "1555820": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 323", + "Section 326", + "Section 147", + "Section 506", + "Section 300", + "Section 304", + "Section 148", + "Section 504" + ], + "155597603": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 279", + "Section 337", + "Section 338", + "Section 336" + ], + "1556622": [ + "Section 436", + "Section 438", + "Section 148" + ], + "155669268": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "155671426": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 34" + ], + "155681659": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "15570219": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 306", + "Section 107", + "Section 323", + "Section 294", + "Section 341", + "Section 3" + ], + "155708015": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 427" + ], + "155709878": [ + "Section 389" + ], + "155614432": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "155751770": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 294" + ], + "155753207": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 363" + ], + "1557576": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "155766205": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "1557710": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "15578272": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "155783905": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 120B", + "Section 438", + "Section 376" + ], + "155792816": [ + "Section 436", + "Section 427", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 438", + "Section 448" + ], + "155801893": [ + "Section 494", + "Section 406", + "Section 498", + "Section 147", + "Section 148" + ], + "1554258": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "155602818": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 143" + ], + "1562577": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 389" + ], + "156295935": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 465", + "Section 504" + ], + "155973631": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 406", + "Section 498A" + ], + "156003967": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 506" + ], + "156010537": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 34" + ], + "156012198": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 498A" + ], + "156014742": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 376" + ], + "155826055": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "155870114": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 324", + "Section 143", + "Section 147" + ], + "155879293": [ + "Section 304B" + ], + "1558845": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "156057175": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 392", + "Section 394", + "Section 506", + "Section 395", + "Section 336" + ], + "156070070": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 307" + ], + "156111196": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 411" + ], + "156125217": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 366", + "Section 452" + ], + "156132592": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 437", + "Section 366A" + ], + "156138717": [ + "Section 313", + "Section 34", + "Section 342", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "156272": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 506", + "Section 376" + ], + "1562804": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 149" + ], + "1562888": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 302" + ], + "15618687": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 364", + "Section 120B", + "Section 342" + ], + "1562050": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 304A", + "Section 337", + "Section 299", + "Section 338" + ], + "1562065": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 511" + ], + "156222": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 354", + "Section 397", + "Section 395", + "Section 452", + "Section 504", + "Section 506" + ], + "156235576": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "156246906": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 302" + ], + "156247034": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1562536": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "15630448": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "156318022": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 354", + "Section 506" + ], + "156319025": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 498" + ], + "156325485": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 306", + "Section 438" + ], + "1563495": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 109", + "Section 471" + ], + "1564959": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 109", + "Section 326", + "Section 120B", + "Section 304" + ], + "156514292": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 304B", + "Section 34" + ], + "1565183": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 186", + "Section 188" + ], + "156928517": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "157161898": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 427", + "Section 155" + ], + "157177334": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 34", + "Section 447", + "Section 438", + "Section 354", + "Section 326" + ], + "157118620": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 438" + ], + "1571241": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "157127526": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 324", + "Section 326", + "Section 156", + "Section 190" + ], + "1571299": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "15714228": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 34" + ], + "156945676": [ + "Section 155", + "Section 447", + "Section 156", + "Section 427", + "Section 506" + ], + "1569501": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 34" + ], + "156952559": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 304" + ], + "156954669": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 342", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "1569773": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 34", + "Section 468", + "Section 417", + "Section 186" + ], + "15707808": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 504", + "Section 324", + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "157080909": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 308", + "Section 304" + ], + "157081253": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 147" + ], + "1570843": [ + "Section 114", + "Section 409" + ], + "157088538": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 498", + "Section 406" + ], + "157239356": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "157181743": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B" + ], + "1571838": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 304" + ], + "157204673": [ + "Section 336", + "Section 147", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 323", + "Section 300" + ], + "15722115": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 376" + ], + "157226401": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 342", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 120", + "Section 506", + "Section 109" + ], + "157233265": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 323", + "Section 156", + "Section 509", + "Section 341", + "Section 506" + ], + "157235178": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "157236795": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107", + "Section 302" + ], + "1583232": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 313" + ], + "1583397": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A" + ], + "158346263": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 323", + "Section 354" + ], + "158588617": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 304B", + "Section 107", + "Section 161", + "Section 34" + ], + "158591069": [ + "Section 186", + "Section 353", + "Section 332" + ], + "1586030": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 342" + ], + "157299843": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 354" + ], + "157300747": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 120", + "Section 468" + ], + "1573084": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 409", + "Section 471" + ], + "1573655": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 376", + "Section 4", + "Section 363" + ], + "157368047": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "157383364": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A" + ], + "157499340": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "15752295": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 376", + "Section 341" + ], + "157451179": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 364" + ], + "157469475": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 380", + "Section 120B" + ], + "157690605": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 120B", + "Section 201", + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 120" + ], + "15790668": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "1597871": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 323", + "Section 436", + "Section 147", + "Section 34", + "Section 438", + "Section 143", + "Section 307", + "Section 148" + ], + "161144960": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 294" + ], + "1575752": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "1575757": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "157582933": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "1575905": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 120B", + "Section 313" + ], + "157836996": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 228", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 34" + ], + "157847642": [ + "Section 494", + "Section 109" + ], + "157854856": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 417", + "Section 34" + ], + "157880": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 323", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 448" + ], + "157901067": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 511", + "Section 379", + "Section 186" + ], + "158168856": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 308", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 304", + "Section 395", + "Section 457", + "Section 389", + "Section 147", + "Section 392", + "Section 34", + "Section 397" + ], + "158186402": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 438", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "158195367": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 506", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 419", + "Section 467", + "Section 406" + ], + "158197985": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 294" + ], + "1580689": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 313" + ], + "15808607": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 341", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 397" + ], + "158668631": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 366", + "Section 363" + ], + "158673820": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 506", + "Section 376" + ], + "1586795": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 452", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 427", + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 457", + "Section 380", + "Section 397" + ], + "158268155": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 380", + "Section 482", + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 500", + "Section 155", + "Section 114", + "Section 120B", + "Section 379", + "Section 448", + "Section 156", + "Section 341", + "Section 109" + ], + "158287279": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 452", + "Section 304", + "Section 365", + "Section 397", + "Section 323", + "Section 395" + ], + "158289613": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "15829456": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 482", + "Section 467", + "Section 420" + ], + "158296275": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 406", + "Section 509", + "Section 420", + "Section 161" + ], + "158298593": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 376", + "Section 34" + ], + "15831553": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "1583508": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 326", + "Section 320", + "Section 324" + ], + "158360849": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 120B" + ], + "158385114": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 294", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "158454264": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 482", + "Section 320", + "Section 294" + ], + "158456344": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 325", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 302" + ], + "158469669": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 143" + ], + "158627042": [ + "Section 500", + "Section 34" + ], + "158645190": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 354", + "Section 342", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "1586532": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 342" + ], + "158691801": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 120B" + ], + "158703728": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "158738472": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 325" + ], + "158745915": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 465" + ], + "158759962": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 307", + "Section 341", + "Section 342" + ], + "158266215": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 363" + ], + "158690730": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 313" + ], + "1589234": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 325" + ], + "158928817": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 120B", + "Section 188", + "Section 148", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "158931014": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "158942157": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 120", + "Section 438" + ], + "158956435": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 325" + ], + "1589661": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "158966626": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "15897419": [ + "Section 447", + "Section 294", + "Section 506" + ], + "158984069": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 320" + ], + "158985204": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 300", + "Section 307", + "Section 326", + "Section 304", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 299", + "Section 34" + ], + "1590398": [ + "Section 228", + "Section 193" + ], + "159059101": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "159072528": [ + "Section 447", + "Section 326", + "Section 354", + "Section 438", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 308" + ], + "159092214": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "159125071": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 120B" + ], + "159127993": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 427" + ], + "159141161": [ + "Section 395", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 397", + "Section 452", + "Section 302", + "Section 411" + ], + "159149760": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B" + ], + "159164381": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306" + ], + "159171958": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 342" + ], + "159306340": [ + "Section 143", + "Section 326", + "Section 147", + "Section 395" + ], + "159314061": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107", + "Section 228" + ], + "1593553": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 143", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 427", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 324", + "Section 304" + ], + "159454257": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 323", + "Section 509", + "Section 114", + "Section 354" + ], + "159470131": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 109", + "Section 120B", + "Section 148", + "Section 149" + ], + "1596866": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34" + ], + "1596917": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "1596965": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 380", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 427", + "Section 148" + ], + "159706058": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 341", + "Section 147", + "Section 376" + ], + "1597107": [ + "Section 149" + ], + "1598196": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 300", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 325", + "Section 147" + ], + "16020087": [ + "Section 332", + "Section 353" + ], + "160349113": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "159534225": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34" + ], + "159541": [ + "Section 313", + "Section 467", + "Section 120B", + "Section 411", + "Section 471", + "Section 468" + ], + "159547612": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "159553084": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420" + ], + "15956": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 228", + "Section 379", + "Section 201", + "Section 380", + "Section 467", + "Section 325", + "Section 326", + "Section 109", + "Section 200" + ], + "159565566": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "159567976": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 307" + ], + "159568673": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "1595698": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 201", + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "159822224": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 354", + "Section 164", + "Section 323" + ], + "1598272": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 279", + "Section 304" + ], + "1598325": [ + "Section 186", + "Section 353" + ], + "159933759": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 34", + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 419" + ], + "1599403": [ + "Section 313" + ], + "159951320": [ + "Section 156", + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 120B", + "Section 471", + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 406" + ], + "159975226": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1599862": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 149" + ], + "160011604": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 341", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 511", + "Section 149", + "Section 325", + "Section 186" + ], + "160056737": [ + "Section 389" + ], + "1600748": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "160128215": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "160136457": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 326" + ], + "1601056": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "160365741": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 294" + ], + "1604706": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 326" + ], + "160471734": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 354" + ], + "160474079": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 354" + ], + "1604750": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1603762": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "1603765": [ + "Section 465", + "Section 471", + "Section 482", + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 34", + "Section 120" + ], + "16040044": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "160440145": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 411", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 307" + ], + "1604404": [ + "Section 190", + "Section 4", + "Section 193", + "Section 5", + "Section 156", + "Section 2", + "Section 308" + ], + "160447028": [ + "Section 363" + ], + "160144758": [ + "Section 308", + "Section 337", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "160146112": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 34", + "Section 438" + ], + "160151894": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 299" + ], + "1601537": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "160222398": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 406", + "Section 506", + "Section 420" + ], + "160251066": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "160299929": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 34" + ], + "1603111": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 320", + "Section 307" + ], + "160318086": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "160324068": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 379", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 307", + "Section 325", + "Section 341" + ], + "160589534": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 376", + "Section 304", + "Section 304A", + "Section 109" + ], + "160599771": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 341" + ], + "1605558": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 304B", + "Section 366" + ], + "160560602": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 147", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 326", + "Section 325", + "Section 452", + "Section 323" + ], + "160560949": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "16056318": [ + "Section 395", + "Section 392" + ], + "160565758": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 306" + ], + "160573095": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 498A", + "Section 376", + "Section 323", + "Section 307" + ], + "160622966": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 366", + "Section 313" + ], + "160639660": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323" + ], + "160639912": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 143" + ], + "161064947": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "1605125": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 415", + "Section 511", + "Section 120B", + "Section 419" + ], + "160831367": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "160649518": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 109", + "Section 342" + ], + "160650686": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 353", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 379", + "Section 506" + ], + "160659067": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 465" + ], + "160672350": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 354", + "Section 323", + "Section 447" + ], + "160698370": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498" + ], + "160712034": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 324", + "Section 354", + "Section 308", + "Section 376" + ], + "161143509": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 326" + ], + "160876629": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 201", + "Section 304", + "Section 307" + ], + "160878223": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "1609018": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "160928127": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 307", + "Section 320" + ], + "1611454": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 161", + "Section 313" + ], + "161145551": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 420", + "Section 437" + ], + "161151554": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 324", + "Section 147", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 300", + "Section 148" + ], + "1611543": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "1611623": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 409", + "Section 120B", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 13" + ], + "161193131": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 448", + "Section 336", + "Section 342", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 397" + ], + "1612027": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 332" + ], + "161288857": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 427" + ], + "16125494": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 325", + "Section 504", + "Section 323" + ], + "161260551": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 506", + "Section 419" + ], + "161317158": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 354", + "Section 34" + ], + "1613182": [ + "Section 149" + ], + "161326": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "161342542": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 498", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "161359958": [ + "Section 450", + "Section 376" + ], + "161368191": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 320", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 406" + ], + "161376721": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 366" + ], + "1613875": [ + "Section 465", + "Section 120", + "Section 468" + ], + "161435023": [ + "Section 336", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "161435659": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 504", + "Section 506" + ], + "16192": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "16192395": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 34" + ], + "161928817": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 34", + "Section 156" + ], + "1619376": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 143" + ], + "16193779": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 338", + "Section 337", + "Section 300" + ], + "161801005": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 448", + "Section 376", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "1618016": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 354" + ], + "161802142": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "161806076": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "161810872": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 299" + ], + "161575297": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "161600699": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 375", + "Section 307" + ], + "1616402": [ + "Section 304A" + ], + "1620321": [ + "Section 149" + ], + "162056": [ + "Section 186", + "Section 2", + "Section 188", + "Section 353" + ], + "1621575": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 300", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "162188797": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "162197426": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 156" + ], + "1622293": [ + "Section 13", + "Section 161", + "Section 437" + ], + "162235651": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "162237561": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 406", + "Section 498A" + ], + "162309728": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "162311664": [ + "Section 320", + "Section 482", + "Section 354", + "Section 323", + "Section 447", + "Section 34" + ], + "162350391": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366A", + "Section 120B", + "Section 376" + ], + "1624404": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "1624469": [ + "Section 120B" + ], + "162449359": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 332" + ], + "162922005": [ + "Section 120B" + ], + "1629402": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 34" + ], + "1629464": [ + "Section 397" + ], + "1630190": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 299", + "Section 324", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 304", + "Section 147" + ], + "163034259": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 392", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 397", + "Section 326", + "Section 323", + "Section 379", + "Section 341", + "Section 302", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "1630427": [ + "Section 494", + "Section 114" + ], + "163043085": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 332", + "Section 302", + "Section 353", + "Section 307" + ], + "163047358": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 325", + "Section 353", + "Section 427", + "Section 332", + "Section 147" + ], + "162630981": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 34" + ], + "162649055": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 332", + "Section 186", + "Section 353" + ], + "162662347": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "1624642": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 300", + "Section 294", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 304", + "Section 307" + ], + "1624663": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "162472459": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "162538311": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "162554071": [ + "Section 155", + "Section 120B", + "Section 379", + "Section 468", + "Section 34", + "Section 511" + ], + "162557628": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 406" + ], + "162583311": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 323" + ], + "1625887": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 34" + ], + "16259280": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "1631179": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 498A", + "Section 307" + ], + "163126866": [ + "Section 511", + "Section 427", + "Section 395", + "Section 376", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 436", + "Section 452" + ], + "1631362": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 384", + "Section 498A", + "Section 389", + "Section 406", + "Section 149", + "Section 506", + "Section 509", + "Section 323", + "Section 341" + ], + "163139426": [ + "Section 380" + ], + "1631440": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 120" + ], + "162670602": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "1626765": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 325", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 307" + ], + "162682024": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 366A", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 34" + ], + "162689785": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 294" + ], + "162698521": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 427" + ], + "163048562": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 457" + ], + "1627918": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "162793124": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 294" + ], + "162809834": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "162810000": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "162813209": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 304B" + ], + "162830575": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 406" + ], + "162856601": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 341", + "Section 438" + ], + "162875549": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 34" + ], + "16295624": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 427", + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "162985094": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "162985804": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 342", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "162987663": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 448", + "Section 109", + "Section 506" + ], + "162989021": [ + "Section 188" + ], + "162996014": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 447", + "Section 448", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "163003508": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 34", + "Section 417", + "Section 506", + "Section 438", + "Section 164" + ], + "163598063": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 394" + ], + "163621038": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "163192696": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "1632010": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "163411458": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 294", + "Section 34" + ], + "163274895": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 174A", + "Section 307", + "Section 229A", + "Section 323" + ], + "163282159": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 427", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 299", + "Section 114", + "Section 3" + ], + "16332024": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "163365360": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294" + ], + "163368476": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "163383454": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 498", + "Section 304B" + ], + "163673064": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "163675900": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 420" + ], + "163682678": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 363", + "Section 365" + ], + "163703775": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420" + ], + "163724": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 500" + ], + "1633269": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "163947933": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 143", + "Section 147", + "Section 109", + "Section 326", + "Section 161", + "Section 149", + "Section 34" + ], + "163965215": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 504", + "Section 419", + "Section 420", + "Section 506" + ], + "163995375": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 498" + ], + "16399570": [ + "Section 364", + "Section 3", + "Section 156", + "Section 366", + "Section 506" + ], + "163998044": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 114", + "Section 397", + "Section 193" + ], + "164010356": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 506", + "Section 504" + ], + "164011967": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 419", + "Section 13" + ], + "1640260": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323" + ], + "164030165": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 294", + "Section 366", + "Section 307", + "Section 354", + "Section 506" + ], + "164067333": [ + "Section 4", + "Section 323", + "Section 148", + "Section 120B", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 143", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 149" + ], + "164080587": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "164094313": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 149" + ], + "164103058": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 452", + "Section 3", + "Section 34", + "Section 313", + "Section 354" + ], + "164186725": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 506" + ], + "16422002": [ + "Section 365", + "Section 363", + "Section 364", + "Section 302" + ], + "164236421": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "164237043": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 438", + "Section 448", + "Section 326" + ], + "164238460": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 506" + ], + "1642399": [ + "Section 494", + "Section 109" + ], + "164242204": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "164244376": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 143", + "Section 448", + "Section 302", + "Section 120B" + ], + "164386647": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107" + ], + "164315310": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 341", + "Section 147", + "Section 427", + "Section 336", + "Section 394", + "Section 307" + ], + "164372380": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 397", + "Section 392", + "Section 411" + ], + "164459457": [ + "Section 509", + "Section 323", + "Section 341" + ], + "16446229": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 4", + "Section 326" + ], + "164463091": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "164472336": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 365", + "Section 384", + "Section 34", + "Section 395" + ], + "16462235": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34" + ], + "164564904": [ + "Section 2", + "Section 3", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 447", + "Section 147", + "Section 427", + "Section 323" + ], + "164589199": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 452", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "164604213": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "164669964": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 300", + "Section 324", + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "16467260": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 341", + "Section 186", + "Section 504" + ], + "1646861": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 107", + "Section 307" + ], + "16493272": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "1649571": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 120" + ], + "1648719": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 353", + "Section 506", + "Section 186" + ], + "164873784": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 417", + "Section 506" + ], + "162102600": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 392", + "Section 34" + ], + "162107234": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 147" + ], + "162125775": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 34" + ], + "162131484": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 366A", + "Section 120B", + "Section 438", + "Section 506" + ], + "1621463": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 511" + ], + "1621482": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 120B", + "Section 114", + "Section 324" + ], + "165013116": [ + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 397", + "Section 341" + ], + "165015962": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 342" + ], + "1650332": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 34" + ], + "165034308": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 294", + "Section 320", + "Section 506" + ], + "165037883": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 353", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "165044447": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 436", + "Section 379", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 186", + "Section 427", + "Section 332" + ], + "165101491": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 353", + "Section 379", + "Section 188", + "Section 411" + ], + "1651044": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 325", + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 326" + ], + "165107795": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 302" + ], + "165116359": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 34", + "Section 306" + ], + "1652548": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 452", + "Section 323", + "Section 148", + "Section 325" + ], + "1652004": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "1652123": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 107", + "Section 109" + ], + "1652305": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 324", + "Section 392", + "Section 307", + "Section 147" + ], + "165236164": [ + "Section 164", + "Section 341", + "Section 509", + "Section 438" + ], + "1652863": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1653193": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "165571430": [ + "Section 465", + "Section 471", + "Section 120B", + "Section 409", + "Section 468" + ], + "1655775": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "165424980": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 363" + ], + "1658205": [ + "Section 120B" + ], + "1657337": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 149" + ], + "165751155": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "16576379": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 342", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 324" + ], + "1653286": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "165350014": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 323", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 324", + "Section 504", + "Section 341", + "Section 143", + "Section 149" + ], + "165457292": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 406", + "Section 498A" + ], + "165503172": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 313" + ], + "165425235": [ + "Section 155", + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 482", + "Section 156" + ], + "1654301": [ + "Section 201" + ], + "1654470": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 304A" + ], + "16555515": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 406" + ], + "165564636": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 143" + ], + "165564733": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 354" + ], + "166366005": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 376" + ], + "1663739": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 468" + ], + "166379971": [ + "Section 313", + "Section 498A", + "Section 307", + "Section 406" + ], + "166381003": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "165650541": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 509" + ], + "16565185": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 366", + "Section 506" + ], + "165668083": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 302" + ], + "165687909": [ + "Section 156", + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 506", + "Section 471", + "Section 406", + "Section 173", + "Section 307", + "Section 504", + "Section 155", + "Section 149", + "Section 482", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 452", + "Section 2" + ], + "165776196": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "165782885": [ + "Section 366A", + "Section 406" + ], + "165789534": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 447", + "Section 34" + ], + "165888486": [ + "Section 389", + "Section 457", + "Section 354" + ], + "166124448": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 323", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 308", + "Section 506", + "Section 201", + "Section 341", + "Section 438", + "Section 147", + "Section 450", + "Section 324" + ], + "1661290": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 323", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 447", + "Section 325" + ], + "166132392": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 109", + "Section 419", + "Section 465", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 506", + "Section 161", + "Section 467" + ], + "16613402": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "166140339": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 34", + "Section 3" + ], + "166156726": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "166169500": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 438", + "Section 506" + ], + "166169922": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "1659002": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 164", + "Section 465", + "Section 467", + "Section 120B" + ], + "1659113": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 306" + ], + "165917816": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "1659516": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471" + ], + "165958552": [ + "Section 363" + ], + "1662641": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 147", + "Section 149" + ], + "166356017": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 338", + "Section 34", + "Section 306", + "Section 498A" + ], + "166450984": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 353", + "Section 188", + "Section 186", + "Section 332" + ], + "166274207": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 452", + "Section 2", + "Section 200" + ], + "1664477": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 304", + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 436", + "Section 304A", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 34", + "Section 379", + "Section 337", + "Section 494", + "Section 448", + "Section 326", + "Section 325", + "Section 332", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 380" + ], + "16701059": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 498A" + ], + "167030005": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 415", + "Section 34" + ], + "158091282": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 341", + "Section 229A" + ], + "158108790": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "158109603": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "1581147": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 302" + ], + "158125439": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 438" + ], + "1821935": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 341", + "Section 324", + "Section 427", + "Section 147", + "Section 384", + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 336", + "Section 342", + "Section 323" + ], + "1822033": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 201", + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 304B" + ], + "182205793": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 143", + "Section 436", + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 427", + "Section 438", + "Section 448" + ], + "182212506": [ + "Section 332", + "Section 506" + ], + "166393014": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 341", + "Section 325", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "166393683": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 366" + ], + "166394700": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323" + ], + "1663959": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 161", + "Section 302", + "Section 325", + "Section 304", + "Section 299", + "Section 300", + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 504", + "Section 320" + ], + "166400407": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 34" + ], + "166458123": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 376", + "Section 294" + ], + "166499968": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 332", + "Section 353" + ], + "166513655": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 307" + ], + "166523420": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "167039637": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 34", + "Section 392" + ], + "167050261": [ + "Section 494", + "Section 109" + ], + "167059954": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 120B", + "Section 364", + "Section 511", + "Section 34" + ], + "167063812": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "1670693": [ + "Section 109" + ], + "167071673": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 320", + "Section 482" + ], + "167086010": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 506", + "Section 342", + "Section 375" + ], + "167100853": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 406", + "Section 504", + "Section 420", + "Section 506" + ], + "16710289": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 34", + "Section 306" + ], + "167107591": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 120", + "Section 336", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 354", + "Section 504", + "Section 452", + "Section 323" + ], + "1692528": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 380", + "Section 457", + "Section 511" + ], + "166743569": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 504", + "Section 307", + "Section 427", + "Section 294", + "Section 376", + "Section 380", + "Section 304", + "Section 148", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "166697": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 34" + ], + "166727689": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 325", + "Section 397", + "Section 323" + ], + "1667338": [ + "Section 436", + "Section 302", + "Section 504", + "Section 307" + ], + "166815344": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 143" + ], + "166815645": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "1668453": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 34" + ], + "166846138": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 341", + "Section 506" + ], + "166853886": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 341", + "Section 147", + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 379", + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "166868526": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 409", + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 299", + "Section 467", + "Section 417" + ], + "1668755": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467" + ], + "166566463": [ + "Section 447", + "Section 427", + "Section 34" + ], + "166585950": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 341", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 397" + ], + "166592922": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "166780734": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "167295992": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "1673002": [ + "Section 193" + ], + "167316769": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 34" + ], + "166847882": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 304B", + "Section 34" + ], + "1672916": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "167472729": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 500" + ], + "1671564": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 109", + "Section 313", + "Section 307" + ], + "1671631": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 342", + "Section 323" + ], + "167171948": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 306" + ], + "167186861": [ + "Section 173" + ], + "1671876": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 376" + ], + "1673235": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 336", + "Section 384", + "Section 427", + "Section 397", + "Section 392" + ], + "167360166": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 325", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 332", + "Section 148", + "Section 427" + ], + "1673651": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498", + "Section 34" + ], + "167366458": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 427" + ], + "167339864": [ + "Section 417", + "Section 120B", + "Section 376", + "Section 304", + "Section 109", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 366A", + "Section 120", + "Section 465" + ], + "167342971": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 120B", + "Section 120", + "Section 161", + "Section 452" + ], + "167350814": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 395", + "Section 34" + ], + "167351097": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 324", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 148", + "Section 506" + ], + "167193447": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 304", + "Section 304B" + ], + "167203210": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 511" + ], + "167210459": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 147", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 354" + ], + "167222375": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 409", + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 120B" + ], + "167648082": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 338", + "Section 304A", + "Section 302", + "Section 337" + ], + "16767106": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "167929693": [ + "Section 511", + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 363" + ], + "167959085": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 494", + "Section 302" + ], + "1679624": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 149" + ], + "16776921": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 294" + ], + "1677797": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 149", + "Section 323", + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 147" + ], + "167785122": [ + "Section 338" + ], + "169273767": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A", + "Section 363" + ], + "1677946": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 498A", + "Section 320", + "Section 307" + ], + "167807151": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "167810680": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "1678623": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 364", + "Section 411", + "Section 482", + "Section 379", + "Section 34", + "Section 365" + ], + "167872637": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 34" + ], + "167879696": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "167887": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 379" + ], + "167894296": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "16789721": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 147" + ], + "167897673": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 506" + ], + "168306106": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 120B" + ], + "168335806": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "168344064": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 324", + "Section 323" + ], + "167996067": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 380" + ], + "168004641": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 437", + "Section 186", + "Section 353" + ], + "1680073": [ + "Section 364", + "Section 120B", + "Section 302", + "Section 109" + ], + "168007417": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 376" + ], + "168040": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 302", + "Section 411", + "Section 304", + "Section 148", + "Section 324", + "Section 417" + ], + "168060815": [ + "Section 447", + "Section 147", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 323", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 342" + ], + "1680717": [ + "Section 155", + "Section 161" + ], + "168080426": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 364", + "Section 365", + "Section 120B", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 511" + ], + "168138452": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 395", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 332", + "Section 120", + "Section 353", + "Section 504", + "Section 147", + "Section 186", + "Section 323" + ], + "168140114": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "168145929": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 504", + "Section 323" + ], + "1682031": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 379", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 397" + ], + "1682075": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300" + ], + "168211073": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 306", + "Section 147" + ], + "16821678": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 323" + ], + "168236341": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "168240642": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 120B" + ], + "168273760": [ + "Section 450", + "Section 506", + "Section 376" + ], + "168276918": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "168355": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 300", + "Section 299", + "Section 304" + ], + "168388121": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 13", + "Section 471", + "Section 468" + ], + "168967302": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 406" + ], + "1689792": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 109" + ], + "169008236": [ + "Section 190", + "Section 148", + "Section 342", + "Section 336", + "Section 482", + "Section 147" + ], + "168430839": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 302" + ], + "168453731": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "1684657": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 392", + "Section 332", + "Section 34" + ], + "168471847": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 447", + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 438" + ], + "168476909": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "168479084": [ + "Section 107", + "Section 306", + "Section 438" + ], + "168479923": [ + "Section 332", + "Section 294" + ], + "1684928": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 307", + "Section 161", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "168544377": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "168550995": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 468" + ], + "168557800": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "168564600": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 504", + "Section 313", + "Section 323" + ], + "168565": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "168592021": [ + "Section 457", + "Section 354" + ], + "168595": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "168780809": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1687925": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 500" + ], + "168797456": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 13", + "Section 411" + ], + "168798823": [ + "Section 365" + ], + "168802688": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 337", + "Section 279", + "Section 338", + "Section 173", + "Section 304A", + "Section 427", + "Section 304" + ], + "168738319": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 332", + "Section 427" + ], + "168219139": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 448", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "1687188": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 147" + ], + "1688081": [ + "Section 500", + "Section 320" + ], + "1688779": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 193" + ], + "169176505": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 468", + "Section 471" + ], + "168816235": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 468" + ], + "1688317": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 148", + "Section 326", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 353", + "Section 201", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 300" + ], + "168856461": [ + "Section 308", + "Section 294" + ], + "16886319": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 504", + "Section 308", + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 188", + "Section 120B", + "Section 506" + ], + "1688748": [ + "Section 457", + "Section 467", + "Section 419" + ], + "169113379": [ + "Section 13" + ], + "16911423": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 307" + ], + "169115473": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 120B" + ], + "169060612": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 149" + ], + "1690609": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 299", + "Section 304", + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 307" + ], + "169085703": [ + "Section 366A", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 342", + "Section 365" + ], + "169173025": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 354", + "Section 506", + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 120B" + ], + "1692157": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 120", + "Section 341", + "Section 307" + ], + "169224137": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 482", + "Section 471" + ], + "169226865": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 120", + "Section 148", + "Section 506" + ], + "169274383": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "169290761": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 164", + "Section 417", + "Section 161" + ], + "169355875": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 120B", + "Section 363", + "Section 366A" + ], + "1694001": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 120B", + "Section 302" + ], + "169410343": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A" + ], + "169418219": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 467" + ], + "1696036": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 34" + ], + "1696091": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 34" + ], + "1696164": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 326", + "Section 341", + "Section 452" + ], + "1695673": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 467" + ], + "1695911": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "169689093": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 509", + "Section 376", + "Section 34" + ], + "169694610": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "169714166": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294" + ], + "1696748": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 148", + "Section 149" + ], + "169738346": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "1697455": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "169753767": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 149", + "Section 324", + "Section 143", + "Section 353", + "Section 148", + "Section 326", + "Section 186", + "Section 325", + "Section 332" + ], + "1699144": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 420", + "Section 406" + ], + "16992105": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 420", + "Section 34" + ], + "169921336": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "169934178": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 304", + "Section 149", + "Section 201" + ], + "169829863": [ + "Section 107", + "Section 306" + ], + "169833705": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "16985200": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "169885378": [ + "Section 375", + "Section 376" + ], + "170708421": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 304A", + "Section 279" + ], + "170714203": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 452", + "Section 366", + "Section 363" + ], + "1707158": [ + "Section 409" + ], + "170717412": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 308", + "Section 353" + ], + "1699714": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 379" + ], + "1699752": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 304", + "Section 324", + "Section 147" + ], + "169976047": [ + "Section 384", + "Section 465" + ], + "169308399": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294" + ], + "169319645": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 427", + "Section 448", + "Section 34" + ], + "1703113": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "170315752": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 341" + ], + "170317396": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 304B" + ], + "170323881": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 308", + "Section 353", + "Section 188", + "Section 120B", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "170333264": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "1701019": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "170055362": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 498A", + "Section 406" + ], + "170071140": [ + "Section 395", + "Section 392" + ], + "170082154": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 332", + "Section 353", + "Section 504" + ], + "170149827": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 509" + ], + "170152760": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 325", + "Section 323" + ], + "170398371": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "17040079": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 306", + "Section 201", + "Section 304B", + "Section 364" + ], + "1704032": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 307" + ], + "170405492": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "170416532": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 341", + "Section 307" + ], + "1704411": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "1704486": [ + "Section 419", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467", + "Section 471" + ], + "170506762": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 437" + ], + "17051015": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "1709945": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "170998474": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 324", + "Section 341" + ], + "1710104": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 498A", + "Section 147" + ], + "171010467": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "6537403": [ + "Section 465", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 109" + ], + "6537763": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 324", + "Section 304", + "Section 307", + "Section 498A", + "Section 323", + "Section 302", + "Section 504" + ], + "65388807": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 107", + "Section 109", + "Section 341", + "Section 307" + ], + "40137": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 506", + "Section 376" + ], + "40141506": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 498A", + "Section 294" + ], + "40142260": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 302", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "40148305": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 509", + "Section 506" + ], + "40150908": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 34", + "Section 320", + "Section 482" + ], + "401547": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 342", + "Section 302", + "Section 498A" + ], + "40167426": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 3" + ], + "40171504": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 511" + ], + "40174178": [ + "Section 279" + ], + "402009": [ + "Section 338" + ], + "402026": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 341", + "Section 506" + ], + "40212158": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 120B", + "Section 366A" + ], + "125238748": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 302" + ], + "125256661": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506" + ], + "125263127": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "139098790": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406" + ], + "139116396": [ + "Section 389", + "Section 437", + "Section 376" + ], + "139126772": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107", + "Section 294" + ], + "139130726": [ + "Section 338", + "Section 304A", + "Section 279", + "Section 337" + ], + "139139671": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 366", + "Section 363" + ], + "13917272": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1391811": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 304", + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 161", + "Section 300", + "Section 299", + "Section 302", + "Section 2", + "Section 173", + "Section 304A" + ], + "1203005": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 417", + "Section 3" + ], + "175689100": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 376", + "Section 504", + "Section 511", + "Section 34", + "Section 506" + ], + "428297": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 482", + "Section 120B", + "Section 415" + ], + "42842315": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "428505": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "42871632": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "79261579": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 341", + "Section 509", + "Section 506" + ], + "7926571": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 4" + ], + "185319": [ + "Section 5" + ], + "185322071": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 302" + ], + "185325186": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 304" + ], + "1707346": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "170740023": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 299" + ], + "170765451": [ + "Section 395", + "Section 120B", + "Section 332", + "Section 353" + ], + "1707724": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 465", + "Section 471", + "Section 406", + "Section 467" + ], + "170778654": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 34" + ], + "1961412": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 148" + ], + "196145441": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B" + ], + "24185519": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "24189551": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 420" + ], + "242075": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467" + ], + "69615608": [ + "Section 447", + "Section 354", + "Section 438", + "Section 34" + ], + "69618254": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 406" + ], + "69633053": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 173", + "Section 34", + "Section 304", + "Section 325", + "Section 304A", + "Section 190", + "Section 193" + ], + "69638347": [ + "Section 186", + "Section 506" + ], + "69678305": [ + "Section 465", + "Section 120B", + "Section 397", + "Section 482" + ], + "170880264": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 341" + ], + "170841272": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 506" + ], + "170846987": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 354", + "Section 306" + ], + "170902741": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467" + ], + "170906745": [ + "Section 173" + ], + "170909": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 325", + "Section 326", + "Section 302" + ], + "170949327": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 411", + "Section 394", + "Section 120" + ], + "268267": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 109", + "Section 201" + ], + "26846768": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 34" + ], + "26847599": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 188", + "Section 379", + "Section 447" + ], + "26850871": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 511", + "Section 13" + ], + "76454347": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 452", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 427", + "Section 149" + ], + "764629": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 300" + ], + "76464785": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420" + ], + "764717": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 304", + "Section 147", + "Section 34", + "Section 447" + ], + "76516664": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 34", + "Section 447", + "Section 354", + "Section 326" + ], + "76518": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "76610954": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 13" + ], + "766276": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 326", + "Section 504", + "Section 336", + "Section 302", + "Section 325", + "Section 337", + "Section 323", + "Section 332" + ], + "76551230": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34" + ], + "76564838": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 409", + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 190", + "Section 482", + "Section 406", + "Section 419", + "Section 120" + ], + "76568820": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "76587151": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 509", + "Section 120B" + ], + "171071471": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 506" + ], + "171072493": [ + "Section 308", + "Section 325", + "Section 324", + "Section 452", + "Section 397", + "Section 304" + ], + "171082254": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 228" + ], + "1710938": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 376" + ], + "1710962": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 379", + "Section 447", + "Section 120", + "Section 427", + "Section 148", + "Section 363" + ], + "1711149": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 365", + "Section 364", + "Section 511" + ], + "1711226": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "1378438": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 326", + "Section 324" + ], + "137866172": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 354", + "Section 437" + ], + "1378828": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 326", + "Section 149" + ], + "1378845": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 394" + ], + "97976314": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "97990504": [ + "Section 5" + ], + "182859673": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "153113579": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302" + ], + "153125632": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 397", + "Section 379", + "Section 363", + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 336", + "Section 392" + ], + "1531376": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 338", + "Section 279" + ], + "1531599": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 324", + "Section 155" + ], + "1531617": [ + "Section 201" + ], + "1532284": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 506" + ], + "122869490": [ + "Section 419", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 420" + ], + "122912946": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 324" + ], + "122925604": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "122926": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 394", + "Section 323" + ], + "1229348": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 509", + "Section 379", + "Section 468" + ], + "122935310": [ + "Section 509", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "122945558": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 324", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506" + ], + "122947466": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 354" + ], + "1229991": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "123009976": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 465", + "Section 468" + ], + "123023895": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 5", + "Section 395", + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 411" + ], + "456111": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "456155": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "45565580": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 448", + "Section 504", + "Section 34", + "Section 324" + ], + "45623705": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 354" + ], + "45634153": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506" + ], + "456355": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 304", + "Section 147" + ], + "456565": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 299", + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "71843369": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "71870431": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 229A", + "Section 394", + "Section 174A" + ], + "37851614": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 5" + ], + "37896135": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "114000": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1140135": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 107", + "Section 326" + ], + "114019251": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498", + "Section 34" + ], + "114026206": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 306" + ], + "114028341": [ + "Section 365", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "1140330": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 341", + "Section 325", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "114041200": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "114082734": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 120" + ], + "1140958": [ + "Section 417", + "Section 147", + "Section 447" + ], + "114097375": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 450", + "Section 375" + ], + "114101454": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 452" + ], + "114408042": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 509" + ], + "1144649": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "114486715": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 406", + "Section 498A" + ], + "114505107": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 228" + ], + "57740495": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 376" + ], + "5776149": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "57778563": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 336", + "Section 34", + "Section 320" + ], + "57784032": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 338" + ], + "57786552": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 465" + ], + "63424593": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 506" + ], + "63425201": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 294" + ], + "163056408": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 120B", + "Section 366A" + ], + "1630569": [ + "Section 5" + ], + "163073160": [ + "Section 2", + "Section 34", + "Section 120B", + "Section 3" + ], + "163090059": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "163090890": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 341", + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 392" + ], + "57555980": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 34" + ], + "575656": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 300" + ], + "57583669": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 323", + "Section 468", + "Section 506" + ], + "57594070": [ + "Section 465", + "Section 420" + ], + "14348959": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 341", + "Section 498A", + "Section 324", + "Section 406", + "Section 34" + ], + "143499522": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 326", + "Section 325", + "Section 341" + ], + "143521170": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 332", + "Section 354", + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 186" + ], + "143620811": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 364" + ], + "143641762": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467" + ], + "110132555": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "110072147": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 366", + "Section 506", + "Section 364", + "Section 363" + ], + "110107804": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 509", + "Section 376", + "Section 34" + ], + "1102167": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "11016543": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 308", + "Section 34" + ], + "1101786": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 468", + "Section 411" + ], + "110182469": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "1566250": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 379", + "Section 411" + ], + "156649396": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 120B", + "Section 148", + "Section 120", + "Section 353" + ], + "156685584": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 427", + "Section 506", + "Section 147" + ], + "1566975": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 354", + "Section 323", + "Section 452", + "Section 363" + ], + "156701241": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "15670690": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1564231": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 409", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 120" + ], + "1564246": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 397", + "Section 304A", + "Section 436", + "Section 323", + "Section 448", + "Section 380", + "Section 114" + ], + "156425057": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 465", + "Section 120", + "Section 448", + "Section 420", + "Section 467" + ], + "156431205": [ + "Section 300" + ], + "156432": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 147", + "Section 326" + ], + "156436635": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 452", + "Section 307", + "Section 394", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 326" + ], + "156445424": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 120B", + "Section 147" + ], + "1564466": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 149" + ], + "15647751": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 506" + ], + "156551445": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 468", + "Section 120B", + "Section 465", + "Section 471" + ], + "156560349": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 376" + ], + "156564142": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 397", + "Section 392" + ], + "156570256": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 325", + "Section 447", + "Section 307", + "Section 438" + ], + "134025036": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 375", + "Section 376", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 509" + ], + "1422275": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 506" + ], + "150006226": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 323" + ], + "150020772": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 326", + "Section 323", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 148", + "Section 506" + ], + "1500208": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 338", + "Section 304A" + ], + "8177575": [ + "Section 419", + "Section 384", + "Section 406" + ], + "81743232": [ + "Section 375", + "Section 366", + "Section 342", + "Section 114" + ], + "81752759": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 471", + "Section 109", + "Section 468" + ], + "817642": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 149" + ], + "81771771": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "141200619": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 120", + "Section 342", + "Section 376", + "Section 395", + "Section 354", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "141208381": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 34", + "Section 427" + ], + "141216761": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 452" + ], + "141245011": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 354", + "Section 448", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 427" + ], + "141089477": [ + "Section 457", + "Section 420", + "Section 34" + ], + "1411090": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "77933360": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 498A", + "Section 307" + ], + "77949046": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 323" + ], + "779540": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 379", + "Section 447", + "Section 200" + ], + "779560": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "77956114": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 366A", + "Section 2", + "Section 34" + ], + "77990573": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 395", + "Section 397" + ], + "77991496": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 511", + "Section 324", + "Section 452" + ], + "77995661": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 420", + "Section 482", + "Section 120B", + "Section 457", + "Section 380" + ], + "77995789": [ + "Section 511", + "Section 306" + ], + "78086257": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 447", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "177888519": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "177897971": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 392", + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 294", + "Section 363", + "Section 307" + ], + "177910988": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 304", + "Section 308" + ], + "177925476": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 120B", + "Section 302", + "Section 436", + "Section 427", + "Section 323", + "Section 304", + "Section 452", + "Section 174A", + "Section 3", + "Section 148", + "Section 300", + "Section 395", + "Section 397", + "Section 450", + "Section 325" + ], + "177925816": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 306" + ], + "171164615": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 506", + "Section 420", + "Section 452" + ], + "171182212": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A", + "Section 427", + "Section 452", + "Section 341", + "Section 188", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 332", + "Section 323", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "1711867": [ + "Section 4", + "Section 3" + ], + "171188268": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "171226172": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 307" + ], + "171337610": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 397", + "Section 34", + "Section 392" + ], + "1713569": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 397", + "Section 392" + ], + "171363850": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A", + "Section 411", + "Section 392" + ], + "171368469": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406" + ], + "171294653": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "1713016": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 304", + "Section 392" + ], + "171320792": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302" + ], + "171321580": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 34", + "Section 3" + ], + "52534160": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 409", + "Section 471", + "Section 468" + ], + "52537104": [ + "Section 229A" + ], + "52538970": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 326" + ], + "190197025": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 294", + "Section 107" + ], + "190198713": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 34" + ], + "190216320": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 156" + ], + "1902177": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 304", + "Section 324", + "Section 326", + "Section 300", + "Section 143", + "Section 147", + "Section 406", + "Section 323" + ], + "190219222": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 323", + "Section 506" + ], + "190237958": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 304A", + "Section 299", + "Section 300", + "Section 201", + "Section 338", + "Section 193" + ], + "193186538": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 326" + ], + "193190764": [ + "Section 201" + ], + "193213486": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "22159603": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 34", + "Section 188" + ], + "22170876": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302" + ], + "221716": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 506", + "Section 397" + ], + "22181539": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "22187886": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 4" + ], + "22201998": [ + "Section 306" + ], + "22207681": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 504", + "Section 420", + "Section 406" + ], + "1238991": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 308", + "Section 452", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 325" + ], + "123899300": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 363" + ], + "123907052": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 34" + ], + "123911027": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 147" + ], + "123912792": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "123928108": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 308", + "Section 34" + ], + "1714947": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "171501714": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 498A", + "Section 323", + "Section 354", + "Section 326", + "Section 325", + "Section 34", + "Section 120B" + ], + "159740133": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "1597475": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 506", + "Section 452", + "Section 342", + "Section 448", + "Section 3" + ], + "159748": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 467", + "Section 406", + "Section 420" + ], + "159749528": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "15975003": [ + "Section 500", + "Section 384" + ], + "1597517": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 325", + "Section 304" + ], + "1597551": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "159763502": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 201" + ], + "159862309": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 279", + "Section 337", + "Section 338", + "Section 397" + ], + "159869826": [ + "Section 304B" + ], + "159895050": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 498A" + ], + "159895509": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 420", + "Section 468" + ], + "166203462": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 438", + "Section 326" + ], + "166211677": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 304B", + "Section 306", + "Section 307", + "Section 34" + ], + "1663039": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 306", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 406", + "Section 325", + "Section 465", + "Section 313" + ], + "166313346": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 200", + "Section 471" + ], + "1663533": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 326", + "Section 294" + ], + "48047744": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 34", + "Section 498", + "Section 304", + "Section 302" + ], + "48075179": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294" + ], + "48077643": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302" + ], + "48102451": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 353", + "Section 379", + "Section 392", + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "48104978": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "48110962": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 504", + "Section 447", + "Section 323", + "Section 326", + "Section 325", + "Section 324", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 143", + "Section 148" + ], + "481658": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 342", + "Section 201" + ], + "48171534": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 143", + "Section 504", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 326", + "Section 149" + ], + "48180715": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294", + "Section 34", + "Section 506" + ], + "483728": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 394", + "Section 323" + ], + "48432892": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 34", + "Section 420", + "Section 120" + ], + "48530293": [ + "Section 450", + "Section 376", + "Section 342", + "Section 2", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "180675945": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 452", + "Section 34", + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 326", + "Section 324" + ], + "153926848": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 342", + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 363" + ], + "153838211": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "153839940": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 354", + "Section 506", + "Section 438" + ], + "153847855": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 452", + "Section 427", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 482", + "Section 506" + ], + "153855320": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 506" + ], + "153859580": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 504" + ], + "15387398": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 120B" + ], + "80637886": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 306", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 448" + ], + "806482": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 438" + ], + "806077": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 34", + "Section 320", + "Section 323" + ], + "806082": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 323", + "Section 109", + "Section 149", + "Section 2", + "Section 376", + "Section 114", + "Section 341", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 3" + ], + "80616728": [ + "Section 188" + ], + "806197": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "349952": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 114" + ], + "34996317": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 320" + ], + "349982": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 299", + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "35013731": [ + "Section 107", + "Section 324", + "Section 4", + "Section 326", + "Section 320" + ], + "35014088": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 34", + "Section 447", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "35027525": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 354" + ], + "35148467": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 302", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "35165306": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "35113171": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "72452158": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 186", + "Section 324", + "Section 353", + "Section 326" + ], + "72463272": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "72467027": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 406", + "Section 498A" + ], + "72527494": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 341", + "Section 186", + "Section 149", + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 148", + "Section 427" + ], + "72532881": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 411", + "Section 457", + "Section 34" + ], + "73093896": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 34" + ], + "7309418": [ + "Section 417", + "Section 376" + ], + "7309984": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 504" + ], + "73102843": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 409", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 468" + ], + "73103176": [ + "Section 186", + "Section 341", + "Section 143", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 332", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 427" + ], + "73131616": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 323", + "Section 148", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 452", + "Section 147" + ], + "73414502": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 308", + "Section 326", + "Section 438", + "Section 504", + "Section 34", + "Section 447" + ], + "73429249": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 186", + "Section 120B" + ], + "73440370": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "734408": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "186598902": [ + "Section 336", + "Section 120B", + "Section 436" + ], + "186601415": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 294" + ], + "186603242": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 34", + "Section 417" + ], + "1866120": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 34" + ], + "186619053": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467" + ], + "1866255": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 436", + "Section 325" + ], + "1865386": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 34", + "Section 164", + "Section 302", + "Section 313" + ], + "1865458": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 447", + "Section 325", + "Section 147", + "Section 324", + "Section 338", + "Section 427" + ], + "1865824": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 228" + ], + "113253463": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "113261913": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "113315946": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 437" + ], + "113319179": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 336", + "Section 504", + "Section 147", + "Section 354", + "Section 325" + ], + "112883054": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 438", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "112937928": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 375", + "Section 376" + ], + "113224328": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 365", + "Section 34", + "Section 438", + "Section 448", + "Section 326" + ], + "171395216": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300" + ], + "171402206": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 336", + "Section 307", + "Section 353", + "Section 341", + "Section 147", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 332" + ], + "171416689": [ + "Section 500", + "Section 420" + ], + "1716282": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 471", + "Section 468" + ], + "171644008": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "1716748": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 304" + ], + "172037641": [ + "Section 228", + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 120" + ], + "172057525": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 3", + "Section 366", + "Section 354" + ], + "172065981": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 511" + ], + "171477680": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 326", + "Section 325", + "Section 149" + ], + "171537318": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "1715484": [ + "Section 173", + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 34", + "Section 342", + "Section 326", + "Section 148", + "Section 161", + "Section 120B", + "Section 506", + "Section 452", + "Section 376", + "Section 190", + "Section 114" + ], + "171557181": [ + "Section 332", + "Section 506", + "Section 294" + ], + "171569991": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 326" + ], + "172940794": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420" + ], + "173061147": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 34" + ], + "1092831": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 448", + "Section 447", + "Section 506", + "Section 379" + ], + "109283780": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "109293565": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 504", + "Section 302" + ], + "109297193": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 307" + ], + "1093010": [ + "Section 304A" + ], + "1093191": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 148" + ], + "1093710": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 173", + "Section 409" + ], + "109375820": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 406" + ], + "109422109": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 307", + "Section 438" + ], + "109427782": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "109431791": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "109432278": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "110451770": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "110529368": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 420", + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 34" + ], + "109444413": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 338", + "Section 304A" + ], + "1094496": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 452", + "Section 302" + ], + "109455832": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "109457067": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 279" + ], + "109464306": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 427", + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 336", + "Section 457", + "Section 511" + ], + "109467901": [ + "Section 417", + "Section 376", + "Section 450", + "Section 366", + "Section 375" + ], + "105439332": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 366", + "Section 363" + ], + "1054413": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 304", + "Section 324" + ], + "105467773": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 34" + ], + "105468": [ + "Section 313", + "Section 302" + ], + "105474287": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 307" + ], + "1054928": [ + "Section 332", + "Section 147", + "Section 149" + ], + "1055558": [ + "Section 511", + "Section 190", + "Section 2" + ], + "1055741": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 482", + "Section 161", + "Section 109" + ], + "105590151": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 376" + ], + "26054344": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 467", + "Section 438" + ], + "26077876": [ + "Section 364", + "Section 307", + "Section 149" + ], + "260813": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "769860": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 411" + ], + "769867": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34" + ], + "769541": [ + "Section 173", + "Section 190", + "Section 200", + "Section 156" + ], + "76966438": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 420" + ], + "76967993": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 323" + ], + "77005550": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 366" + ], + "77009857": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "77015120": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 504", + "Section 300", + "Section 304", + "Section 34" + ], + "77036217": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 34", + "Section 366A", + "Section 438" + ], + "97348550": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "97367585": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 109", + "Section 156" + ], + "97368077": [ + "Section 436", + "Section 506", + "Section 294" + ], + "9738478": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 201" + ], + "973959": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467" + ], + "82476200": [ + "Section 375", + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 34", + "Section 376" + ], + "82476980": [ + "Section 120B" + ], + "82490970": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 302", + "Section 498A" + ], + "171684003": [ + "Section 494" + ], + "171691061": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 452", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 509", + "Section 341", + "Section 427", + "Section 147" + ], + "171697788": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 13" + ], + "1717046": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 411", + "Section 380" + ], + "1717089": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 332", + "Section 147" + ], + "171714": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 149" + ], + "171729090": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 365", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 438" + ], + "32936849": [ + "Section 509", + "Section 506", + "Section 354", + "Section 294" + ], + "3297264": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "3297525": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "32982963": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "32994714": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 394", + "Section 341", + "Section 353", + "Section 397" + ], + "3299788": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 148" + ], + "33004452": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 376" + ], + "33005699": [ + "Section 313", + "Section 379", + "Section 341", + "Section 504", + "Section 307", + "Section 326", + "Section 120B", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 511" + ], + "96128819": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107", + "Section 34", + "Section 155", + "Section 156", + "Section 3" + ], + "96154809": [ + "Section 320", + "Section 482", + "Section 147", + "Section 504", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 149", + "Section 143", + "Section 326", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "603987": [ + "Section 164", + "Section 364" + ], + "60416512": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "60418541": [ + "Section 419", + "Section 420", + "Section 34" + ], + "604780": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 302" + ], + "60481140": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "604819": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306" + ], + "86282443": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 452", + "Section 504", + "Section 506" + ], + "86291563": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 323", + "Section 452", + "Section 504", + "Section 147", + "Section 506" + ], + "86298294": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 324", + "Section 143", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "86310257": [ + "Section 409" + ], + "863509": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 325", + "Section 34", + "Section 148", + "Section 304", + "Section 114" + ], + "86355529": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 307" + ], + "86358432": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "86364644": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "86365440": [ + "Section 13", + "Section 409", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B" + ], + "86369719": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "86378089": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 498A" + ], + "869275": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "86932019": [ + "Section 143", + "Section 149", + "Section 294", + "Section 427", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 452", + "Section 324", + "Section 341", + "Section 302", + "Section 147" + ], + "86941491": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 34", + "Section 320", + "Section 506" + ], + "8694555": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 506", + "Section 294" + ], + "86950748": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 482", + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 155", + "Section 415", + "Section 406", + "Section 156", + "Section 193" + ], + "757151": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 2", + "Section 114" + ], + "75767825": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 419", + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 506", + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 173", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "102151651": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 341", + "Section 326" + ], + "102165833": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "102176989": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 511" + ], + "10217970": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 397" + ], + "1717873": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 304", + "Section 302" + ], + "171790113": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 354", + "Section 34" + ], + "171802734": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 342", + "Section 506", + "Section 392", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 504" + ], + "171807956": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 120B" + ], + "1814534": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "181468966": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "181472268": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 452", + "Section 376" + ], + "20312010": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 468" + ], + "203140": [ + "Section 5", + "Section 467", + "Section 409", + "Section 120B", + "Section 420" + ], + "203275": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 406" + ], + "20408848": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 353", + "Section 427", + "Section 34", + "Section 186" + ], + "204255": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "20435611": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "20378649": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 304", + "Section 323", + "Section 498A", + "Section 149" + ], + "204022": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 302" + ], + "140199063": [ + "Section 366" + ], + "140230934": [ + "Section 228" + ], + "14023122": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "1222111": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 299" + ], + "122217": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 326", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 323" + ], + "44683353": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 406", + "Section 420" + ], + "446989": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 308", + "Section 323", + "Section 324" + ], + "44700193": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 324", + "Section 294" + ], + "44719894": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 452", + "Section 302" + ], + "44729947": [ + "Section 511", + "Section 376" + ], + "44730325": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 186" + ], + "106903126": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 313" + ], + "106903873": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 34", + "Section 448", + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 325" + ], + "1069175": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "10692033": [ + "Section 494" + ], + "106920397": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 411", + "Section 394", + "Section 34" + ], + "106937748": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 299", + "Section 313" + ], + "10694966": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 498A", + "Section 482" + ], + "106994746": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 363", + "Section 354", + "Section 448", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 366", + "Section 156" + ], + "106997795": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "106998451": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 411", + "Section 188", + "Section 379", + "Section 34" + ], + "106999665": [ + "Section 332", + "Section 353" + ], + "47741603": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 294" + ], + "47763396": [ + "Section 332", + "Section 353", + "Section 320" + ], + "47787020": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "158893846": [ + "Section 366A", + "Section 363", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "179036838": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 324", + "Section 406" + ], + "17904216": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 376", + "Section 300", + "Section 34", + "Section 304", + "Section 164", + "Section 375", + "Section 120B", + "Section 299" + ], + "17906054": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 120", + "Section 409", + "Section 482", + "Section 471" + ], + "143098606": [ + "Section 304A" + ], + "143109328": [ + "Section 279", + "Section 337" + ], + "1431119": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 504", + "Section 147" + ], + "1431328": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "143217691": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 161" + ], + "143243873": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "171893904": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "171916871": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 341", + "Section 506" + ], + "1719453": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 201", + "Section 304", + "Section 379", + "Section 411" + ], + "171969216": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 437", + "Section 376" + ], + "171973074": [ + "Section 511", + "Section 376" + ], + "120684769": [ + "Section 229A" + ], + "1206873": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 498", + "Section 323", + "Section 354" + ], + "120689737": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "120707558": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 336", + "Section 384", + "Section 427", + "Section 397", + "Section 392" + ], + "120717835": [ + "Section 395" + ], + "120726166": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 161", + "Section 164" + ], + "120738387": [ + "Section 384", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 324" + ], + "120749041": [ + "Section 120", + "Section 156", + "Section 406", + "Section 504", + "Section 509", + "Section 465", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 190" + ], + "535029": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 161", + "Section 498A" + ], + "535129": [ + "Section 304A" + ], + "53532689": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 325" + ], + "53538959": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 366" + ], + "21336557": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 299", + "Section 200", + "Section 120", + "Section 419", + "Section 406" + ], + "21357234": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 120B", + "Section 468" + ], + "147902722": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "14796306": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "1479755": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "14797632": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 447", + "Section 324", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 308" + ], + "147982774": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "1479959": [ + "Section 164", + "Section 364" + ], + "148001814": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 228", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 465", + "Section 468" + ], + "1480036": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 420", + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 467", + "Section 34", + "Section 228" + ], + "94896262": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 465" + ], + "949074": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 437", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 406" + ], + "95": [ + "Section 417", + "Section 380" + ], + "95005051": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 320" + ], + "950266": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "58514649": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 342", + "Section 448", + "Section 376" + ], + "585223": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "5855632": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 304" + ], + "58557389": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 307" + ], + "58562604": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 323", + "Section 363" + ], + "58575084": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 457" + ], + "58578044": [ + "Section 186", + "Section 353", + "Section 294" + ], + "58580813": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 323", + "Section 427", + "Section 147", + "Section 325", + "Section 324" + ], + "8425861": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 306", + "Section 511", + "Section 427", + "Section 120B" + ], + "842610": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 392", + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 427" + ], + "84263346": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 155", + "Section 482", + "Section 156" + ], + "1335354": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 34" + ], + "1335414": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 468" + ], + "133566650": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420" + ], + "133568": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 448", + "Section 427", + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 341" + ], + "133606681": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "13360676": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 438", + "Section 506" + ], + "13361116": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 364" + ], + "133933467": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 376", + "Section 498A", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 504" + ], + "133958992": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 2", + "Section 341" + ], + "172345711": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "172348414": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "172349702": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "1723843": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 148" + ], + "172386092": [ + "Section 384", + "Section 376", + "Section 34" + ], + "92563406": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 306", + "Section 467", + "Section 34", + "Section 304B", + "Section 471" + ], + "92563705": [ + "Section 229A" + ], + "92588498": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 394" + ], + "92594060": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 457", + "Section 511" + ], + "926070": [ + "Section 395" + ], + "9261214": [ + "Section 13" + ], + "926196": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "92620199": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 34" + ], + "166919675": [ + "Section 419", + "Section 467", + "Section 506", + "Section 420", + "Section 471" + ], + "166925287": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 376", + "Section 366A", + "Section 465", + "Section 363" + ], + "1669724": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 147" + ], + "166977": [ + "Section 120", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34" + ], + "166985074": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 341", + "Section 332", + "Section 337", + "Section 353", + "Section 504", + "Section 338", + "Section 336" + ], + "15190737": [ + "Section 304B" + ], + "96837100": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "96866": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 147", + "Section 107", + "Section 148" + ], + "96885186": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 147", + "Section 324", + "Section 323" + ], + "96887544": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 354", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "163548884": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 365", + "Section 366A", + "Section 120B", + "Section 376", + "Section 419", + "Section 363" + ], + "163552146": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 34", + "Section 323" + ], + "163525941": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 302", + "Section 448", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 447", + "Section 427", + "Section 299" + ], + "163533944": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 323", + "Section 294", + "Section 34", + "Section 438" + ], + "163534878": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 341" + ], + "16476413": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 376", + "Section 354" + ], + "164792168": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 397" + ], + "164792170": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 366", + "Section 363" + ], + "1440820": [ + "Section 500" + ], + "144085493": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 498A", + "Section 506", + "Section 452" + ], + "144146240": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 419", + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 156" + ], + "144149012": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 300", + "Section 294", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 304", + "Section 307" + ], + "1441495": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "1441705": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 302" + ], + "144191016": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 411", + "Section 394" + ], + "1675377": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 482", + "Section 34", + "Section 417", + "Section 304B", + "Section 415" + ], + "1675509": [ + "Section 193" + ], + "167555876": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "1675752": [ + "Section 436", + "Section 500", + "Section 482" + ], + "1078209": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 342" + ], + "107822961": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 148" + ], + "1078315": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 397", + "Section 341", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "1078412": [ + "Section 173", + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 437", + "Section 302" + ], + "107887655": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 34" + ], + "107894233": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 397" + ], + "124771041": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 427", + "Section 452", + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 149", + "Section 143", + "Section 509" + ], + "1247809": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 354", + "Section 511", + "Section 342" + ], + "1248245": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1248257": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 394" + ], + "124829064": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 323", + "Section 302", + "Section 504" + ], + "124843840": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 353", + "Section 307" + ], + "172070968": [ + "Section 120", + "Section 302" + ], + "172083625": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "172087361": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "172117591": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 438", + "Section 409" + ], + "172120796": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 417", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "130036336": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 308", + "Section 320", + "Section 34" + ], + "130055206": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "129968178": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 506", + "Section 436" + ], + "12999010": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 147", + "Section 427" + ], + "129991977": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 392", + "Section 341", + "Section 397" + ], + "130014293": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 437", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "13260759": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "132654762": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "132656101": [ + "Section 173", + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "13266001": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 504", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 325" + ], + "132660028": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 450", + "Section 394" + ], + "132662602": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 2" + ], + "132678517": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 306", + "Section 34", + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1859935": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 306", + "Section 506" + ], + "1860369": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1860396": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 354" + ], + "186085180": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 186" + ], + "186107198": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 420", + "Section 482", + "Section 228", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 419", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 13" + ], + "186107396": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 323" + ], + "1861116": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "85982347": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 468" + ], + "860047": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "860137": [ + "Section 313" + ], + "86072192": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 448" + ], + "86093668": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "1765330": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 161", + "Section 304B" + ], + "176554178": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 193" + ], + "1765585": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 452", + "Section 379", + "Section 324", + "Section 509", + "Section 506" + ], + "176561080": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 143", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 341", + "Section 109", + "Section 120" + ], + "176583988": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 506" + ], + "176595593": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 307", + "Section 34" + ], + "1765970": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 341" + ], + "176598241": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 325", + "Section 307", + "Section 438" + ], + "176600070": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 120B", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "17660912": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 437" + ], + "1766453": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 392" + ], + "1722056": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 279", + "Section 465" + ], + "172213120": [ + "Section 229A" + ], + "172217611": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 448", + "Section 323", + "Section 326" + ], + "172234278": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "172237240": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 504", + "Section 324", + "Section 323" + ], + "172175029": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294", + "Section 34" + ], + "172180912": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 332", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 149" + ], + "172188": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 109", + "Section 120", + "Section 148", + "Section 307" + ], + "172195682": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 366" + ], + "17219602": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 392", + "Section 465" + ], + "172198803": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 323" + ], + "172202966": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 471", + "Section 465", + "Section 468" + ], + "1722040": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 379", + "Section 354", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 148" + ], + "690957": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 500", + "Section 313" + ], + "69106908": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 324" + ], + "70092781": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 384", + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 465", + "Section 468" + ], + "701043": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 161", + "Section 107", + "Section 506", + "Section 324", + "Section 395", + "Section 34", + "Section 148", + "Section 313", + "Section 147" + ], + "70120499": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A", + "Section 13", + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 409", + "Section 201", + "Section 471" + ], + "70126138": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 34" + ], + "70132444": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 376" + ], + "69190701": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "69202045": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "695594": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 120B", + "Section 161" + ], + "69559834": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 307", + "Section 509", + "Section 34", + "Section 452" + ], + "695602": [ + "Section 500", + "Section 34" + ], + "695660": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 409" + ], + "6957300": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 148", + "Section 332", + "Section 336", + "Section 109", + "Section 307", + "Section 353", + "Section 341", + "Section 436", + "Section 147", + "Section 149" + ], + "255726": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 406", + "Section 409", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 465" + ], + "25578611": [ + "Section 304A" + ], + "2559711": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 380", + "Section 448", + "Section 120B" + ], + "114824208": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "114827901": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 326" + ], + "1148702": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 299", + "Section 304", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 308" + ], + "172245081": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 509", + "Section 354", + "Section 438" + ], + "1722773": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 326" + ], + "61337607": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 498A" + ], + "22653216": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 193", + "Section 354", + "Section 299" + ], + "22664848": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 504", + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 325" + ], + "182774681": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 326", + "Section 341", + "Section 147" + ], + "182778277": [ + "Section 384", + "Section 420" + ], + "182799880": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 448" + ], + "599672": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 392", + "Section 34" + ], + "59968841": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 392", + "Section 34", + "Section 307" + ], + "59912611": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107" + ], + "5992407": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "59931489": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 363" + ], + "80038709": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 326", + "Section 307", + "Section 364", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 450", + "Section 148", + "Section 427", + "Section 324", + "Section 325", + "Section 395" + ], + "80039922": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 506", + "Section 324", + "Section 450", + "Section 452" + ], + "80041906": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 325", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 302" + ], + "800573": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 323" + ], + "80015320": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 34", + "Section 3" + ], + "80019563": [ + "Section 308", + "Section 307", + "Section 452", + "Section 34", + "Section 323" + ], + "80020399": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 471" + ], + "800288": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 228", + "Section 471" + ], + "80257026": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467" + ], + "80258113": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "802735": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "802789": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 324", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 436" + ], + "80279515": [ + "Section 13" + ], + "8028053": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 186", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "80158959": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 465", + "Section 307" + ], + "80284397": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "80548638": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 342", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "805832": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 5" + ], + "86530058": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 34" + ], + "894294": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 379" + ], + "96029846": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 120" + ], + "96786600": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 392", + "Section 341", + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 380", + "Section 397", + "Section 457" + ], + "1576833": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 34" + ], + "157690069": [ + "Section 143", + "Section 341", + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 120B", + "Section 438", + "Section 186" + ], + "1576965": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 325", + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 447" + ], + "157747": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 313", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 161" + ], + "810539": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 120B" + ], + "81055049": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 420" + ], + "810759": [ + "Section 397" + ], + "810217": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 498A" + ], + "810466": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 332", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 427" + ], + "1918955": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 392", + "Section 380", + "Section 114" + ], + "191901": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120B" + ], + "191909088": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 304" + ], + "19191316": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 364", + "Section 342", + "Section 148", + "Section 506" + ], + "1919166": [ + "Section 500", + "Section 34" + ], + "1919444": [ + "Section 447", + "Section 300", + "Section 148", + "Section 304" + ], + "19194467": [ + "Section 279", + "Section 304A", + "Section 337" + ], + "1920533": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 147", + "Section 34", + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 465" + ], + "192096437": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "103263051": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "13085704": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 506", + "Section 509", + "Section 500" + ], + "1308688": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 120B", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 201" + ], + "130875920": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 228", + "Section 471", + "Section 193", + "Section 200" + ], + "130896695": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 342" + ], + "730238": [ + "Section 500", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 379" + ], + "730244": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "730267": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 34" + ], + "145723905": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 406", + "Section 498A" + ], + "145802275": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "145811358": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 34", + "Section 307" + ], + "145829788": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 34", + "Section 397" + ], + "145833766": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 354" + ], + "139806466": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 307", + "Section 363" + ], + "139810459": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 164", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 313" + ], + "139813168": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "13982268": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 325", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 354", + "Section 341", + "Section 323" + ], + "139824276": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 465", + "Section 468" + ], + "900679": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 109", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 304", + "Section 324", + "Section 149" + ], + "900818": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 147" + ], + "90081857": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420" + ], + "901158": [ + "Section 5" + ], + "901309": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "89638740": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 294", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 149", + "Section 148" + ], + "89767449": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 366A" + ], + "89816384": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 341", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 354" + ], + "112266478": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 308" + ], + "1122957": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506" + ], + "112303216": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 149", + "Section 323", + "Section 326", + "Section 307" + ], + "112308": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302" + ], + "112313650": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 143", + "Section 147", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 302" + ], + "172435927": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "172437090": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 4" + ], + "172437125": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 380", + "Section 506", + "Section 452", + "Section 341", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 427", + "Section 149" + ], + "43085835": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 294" + ], + "43121854": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 341", + "Section 363" + ], + "431224": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 320", + "Section 482" + ], + "43331926": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 452", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 143", + "Section 147" + ], + "43336868": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "433426": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 147" + ], + "43377753": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 308", + "Section 323", + "Section 438" + ], + "433931": [ + "Section 320", + "Section 482", + "Section 498A", + "Section 307", + "Section 394" + ], + "42827366": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 323", + "Section 397", + "Section 417" + ], + "4335325": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 307", + "Section 452", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 320" + ], + "108988294": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 120B", + "Section 155", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 341", + "Section 353", + "Section 324", + "Section 156", + "Section 332", + "Section 452", + "Section 186" + ], + "1138739": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 379" + ], + "113896984": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 354", + "Section 506" + ], + "113837": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 323" + ], + "113861702": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 34", + "Section 438" + ], + "1839963": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "18400592": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107", + "Section 498A", + "Section 498" + ], + "184024091": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 306" + ], + "182973099": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1839721": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 395", + "Section 302", + "Section 338", + "Section 307", + "Section 332", + "Section 379", + "Section 465", + "Section 323", + "Section 337", + "Section 120B", + "Section 397", + "Section 34" + ], + "183982188": [ + "Section 397" + ], + "134333715": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 308", + "Section 437", + "Section 294" + ], + "1318230": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "131782393": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 417" + ], + "131790577": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 376" + ], + "131801693": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "44009128": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 406", + "Section 465", + "Section 417" + ], + "440162": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "44031232": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "44040183": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "44045614": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 186" + ], + "440471": [ + "Section 188" + ], + "44144177": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 323" + ], + "440960": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 313" + ], + "44098598": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 467", + "Section 506", + "Section 332", + "Section 420", + "Section 504", + "Section 419", + "Section 471" + ], + "44114295": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 364", + "Section 397", + "Section 3" + ], + "172576560": [ + "Section 395", + "Section 450", + "Section 149", + "Section 34" + ], + "172583131": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 395" + ], + "172615232": [ + "Section 120B" + ], + "1731917": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "173202824": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 364", + "Section 302" + ], + "173210024": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 336", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "173220": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 376", + "Section 375", + "Section 34" + ], + "173438661": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 448", + "Section 323", + "Section 379" + ], + "173641669": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 34", + "Section 448", + "Section 307", + "Section 447", + "Section 325" + ], + "173649063": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 324", + "Section 506" + ], + "1736533": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 506", + "Section 504" + ], + "173653373": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 465" + ], + "173657747": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 34", + "Section 397", + "Section 120", + "Section 109" + ], + "40691173": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 326" + ], + "182218757": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 294" + ], + "182220573": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 323" + ], + "1822232": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 411", + "Section 379", + "Section 380", + "Section 457" + ], + "182223827": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 304", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 300" + ], + "102442366": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 302", + "Section 506" + ], + "1024514": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 326", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 324" + ], + "1024929": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "1025331": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 302" + ], + "102572464": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 365", + "Section 376", + "Section 34" + ], + "1041546": [ + "Section 500", + "Section 201", + "Section 200" + ], + "104162730": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "104170363": [ + "Section 229A" + ], + "1038081": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 419", + "Section 467", + "Section 468" + ], + "104141236": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 323" + ], + "1043699": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B" + ], + "1041879": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 186", + "Section 148", + "Section 120B", + "Section 353", + "Section 3", + "Section 427", + "Section 147", + "Section 143", + "Section 326", + "Section 354" + ], + "104194092": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 380", + "Section 323", + "Section 427" + ], + "1042222": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 5" + ], + "104222301": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 365" + ], + "104225591": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 326", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 147" + ], + "104228963": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 34" + ], + "194696135": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 34", + "Section 438" + ], + "194700417": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 307", + "Section 279", + "Section 448", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "194705345": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "19465": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 394" + ], + "1946566": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 420", + "Section 120" + ], + "1946652": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 326" + ], + "1945508": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "194552940": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 379", + "Section 307", + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 447" + ], + "194556253": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "198937115": [ + "Section 509", + "Section 323", + "Section 341" + ], + "198940183": [ + "Section 409" + ], + "198944842": [ + "Section 156", + "Section 379", + "Section 353" + ], + "1988931": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 415", + "Section 417", + "Section 193", + "Section 465", + "Section 200", + "Section 471" + ], + "1989257": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 326", + "Section 147", + "Section 143" + ], + "198931004": [ + "Section 511", + "Section 376" + ], + "147498854": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 34", + "Section 438" + ], + "147506411": [ + "Section 279", + "Section 304" + ], + "147518263": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 325" + ], + "147530195": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A" + ], + "410740": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 302" + ], + "410773": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 34", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "41102249": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 452" + ], + "113021506": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 34" + ], + "113034354": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 147", + "Section 325", + "Section 308" + ], + "113045198": [ + "Section 190", + "Section 376" + ], + "135014252": [ + "Section 365", + "Section 3", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 364", + "Section 325" + ], + "134942151": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "134945598": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 409", + "Section 120" + ], + "1349478": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 504", + "Section 143", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 4", + "Section 326", + "Section 147" + ], + "134947982": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 506" + ], + "175292065": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 452", + "Section 509", + "Section 506", + "Section 498A", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 427" + ], + "1753013": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 395" + ], + "175233753": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 376", + "Section 120B", + "Section 228" + ], + "175243529": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "60636284": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 504", + "Section 452" + ], + "60652991": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B" + ], + "6066465": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 397", + "Section 394", + "Section 324" + ], + "60664803": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A" + ], + "6074894": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 299" + ], + "60759205": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 511", + "Section 415" + ], + "99917718": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "99942824": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 120B", + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "99993215": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 353", + "Section 379" + ], + "90549184": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 114" + ], + "90554190": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 506", + "Section 186" + ], + "90568453": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "90568759": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 34" + ], + "90572948": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 452", + "Section 302" + ], + "90602114": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "170181": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "170187357": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 306", + "Section 34" + ], + "170200775": [ + "Section 279", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 332", + "Section 307", + "Section 107", + "Section 147", + "Section 326" + ], + "1702066": [ + "Section 494" + ], + "170207578": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "17021567": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 149" + ], + "1702211": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "170224559": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 438", + "Section 467" + ], + "1707641": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 338", + "Section 326", + "Section 437", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 379", + "Section 173", + "Section 427", + "Section 304A" + ], + "1732221": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 304B", + "Section 201", + "Section 306", + "Section 498A", + "Section 302" + ], + "173227821": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 384", + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 156" + ], + "1732333": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 120" + ], + "1732383": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 353", + "Section 193" + ], + "318590": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 306" + ], + "318681": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 415" + ], + "31890209": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A" + ], + "119131874": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 392" + ], + "119174": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 447", + "Section 120B", + "Section 5", + "Section 427" + ], + "119182754": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 452" + ], + "119197156": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 341", + "Section 228", + "Section 452", + "Section 302" + ], + "1192042": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1192050": [ + "Section 482" + ], + "119864201": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 506", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 354" + ], + "1198849": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 299", + "Section 34", + "Section 304", + "Section 3", + "Section 307" + ], + "120332576": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 353", + "Section 294", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "120335548": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 306" + ], + "120335906": [ + "Section 389" + ], + "1593866": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 34" + ], + "1594": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 34" + ], + "1594055": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "159416583": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 450", + "Section 376" + ], + "35748830": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 427", + "Section 447", + "Section 147" + ], + "357556": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 342" + ], + "35755895": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 332", + "Section 506" + ], + "35762163": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "35762611": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 376" + ], + "357688": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "35799249": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 506", + "Section 380" + ], + "358001": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 156", + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 420" + ], + "449878": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "45004949": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 375" + ], + "450176": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 193", + "Section 34" + ], + "45020941": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 302" + ], + "450261": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "49292133": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 294" + ], + "493248": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 300" + ], + "493250": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 147", + "Section 143", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 511" + ], + "49325262": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 120B" + ], + "49328319": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 354", + "Section 294" + ], + "49338205": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 34", + "Section 438" + ], + "49341171": [ + "Section 364", + "Section 342", + "Section 34", + "Section 504", + "Section 120B", + "Section 302", + "Section 313", + "Section 173" + ], + "494048": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 13", + "Section 482", + "Section 120B" + ], + "49415055": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 394", + "Section 34" + ], + "49423015": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 467" + ], + "55496103": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 354", + "Section 465", + "Section 200", + "Section 471", + "Section 34", + "Section 468", + "Section 467" + ], + "5550611": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B" + ], + "555158": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 323" + ], + "55517653": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "55520785": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B" + ], + "55551964": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 436", + "Section 120B" + ], + "555536": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 34", + "Section 149", + "Section 147" + ], + "555727": [ + "Section 188" + ], + "173031067": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 465", + "Section 471", + "Section 120", + "Section 120B", + "Section 468" + ], + "173031279": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 419", + "Section 406", + "Section 420" + ], + "1730508": [ + "Section 228" + ], + "1730573": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "173079729": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 506" + ], + "173088438": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 452" + ], + "173098898": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 109" + ], + "173103855": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 120B", + "Section 313" + ], + "57041662": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 506", + "Section 156", + "Section 482", + "Section 415", + "Section 504", + "Section 420" + ], + "5705256": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 504", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "57054333": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323" + ], + "57068370": [ + "Section 366A", + "Section 448", + "Section 120B", + "Section 376" + ], + "63147693": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 376", + "Section 504", + "Section 452" + ], + "631768": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "63386084": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "67502734": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 366A", + "Section 376" + ], + "67690765": [ + "Section 308", + "Section 482", + "Section 320", + "Section 34" + ], + "67901576": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 379", + "Section 307", + "Section 438" + ], + "65572480": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 365" + ], + "65574885": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 294", + "Section 506" + ], + "65584964": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 2" + ], + "65598073": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 354" + ], + "73767194": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 326", + "Section 509" + ], + "7379430": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 320", + "Section 34", + "Section 324" + ], + "78651479": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 336", + "Section 120B", + "Section 395", + "Section 427" + ], + "78658866": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 147", + "Section 149", + "Section 353" + ], + "7866924": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 307", + "Section 34" + ], + "786761": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 313" + ], + "786944": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 337", + "Section 427", + "Section 338" + ], + "787040": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 427" + ], + "78711043": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 354", + "Section 448", + "Section 509", + "Section 438" + ], + "78778642": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A" + ], + "78793622": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 326", + "Section 294" + ], + "120504326": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 406" + ], + "120519142": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 302" + ], + "1205359": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "12053896": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A" + ], + "120549517": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 341" + ], + "1205537": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 376", + "Section 302" + ], + "120594998": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "120603172": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 376" + ], + "120667015": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 336", + "Section 308", + "Section 506" + ], + "120679791": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 438" + ], + "116167381": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B" + ], + "116181731": [ + "Section 419", + "Section 467", + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 114", + "Section 406", + "Section 465", + "Section 379", + "Section 482" + ], + "116192582": [ + "Section 304A" + ], + "116202510": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 193", + "Section 341", + "Section 504", + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 379" + ], + "116283103": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 341", + "Section 365", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 363" + ], + "116284117": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 342", + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "1243241": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 511" + ], + "1243400": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 34", + "Section 394" + ], + "124938824": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 438" + ], + "125432281": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 326" + ], + "124295084": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 323", + "Section 341", + "Section 427", + "Section 420", + "Section 13", + "Section 3", + "Section 379" + ], + "124297532": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 376" + ], + "127068430": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 436", + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 313" + ], + "127069910": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 376" + ], + "127071007": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 143" + ], + "1270786": [ + "Section 436", + "Section 147", + "Section 323" + ], + "127079355": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 149" + ], + "128585428": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 307" + ], + "128615807": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 341", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "128618880": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 304", + "Section 34" + ], + "133311216": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 304", + "Section 504" + ], + "133323": [ + "Section 306" + ], + "1333318": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "134153640": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A" + ], + "134153942": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 509", + "Section 354", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "134248": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B" + ], + "1362523": [ + "Section 5", + "Section 3", + "Section 4", + "Section 193" + ], + "1362541": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 161", + "Section 313" + ], + "136291191": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 34" + ], + "1363092": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 3", + "Section 302", + "Section 436", + "Section 326", + "Section 120", + "Section 506" + ], + "173151706": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 384" + ], + "173152337": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 366A" + ], + "17315522": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 365", + "Section 120B", + "Section 376", + "Section 34", + "Section 511" + ], + "173155467": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "173155956": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 363" + ], + "173174407": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 304" + ], + "1731796": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 34", + "Section 323" + ], + "173256477": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498" + ], + "173276080": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "173278653": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 353" + ], + "1467785": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "146801592": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 299", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 304B" + ], + "146809709": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "146815507": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 437", + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "146847976": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "146856497": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 300" + ], + "146880871": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 504" + ], + "15409909": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 341", + "Section 504", + "Section 324", + "Section 320", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "154100209": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 294" + ], + "154105231": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 308", + "Section 341" + ], + "154115646": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "154129732": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "154136594": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 511" + ], + "154139001": [ + "Section 161" + ], + "1548314": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "154838774": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 332" + ], + "154840483": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 325", + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 323" + ], + "154850143": [ + "Section 4", + "Section 34", + "Section 3", + "Section 2", + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 156" + ], + "154860343": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 452", + "Section 324", + "Section 307" + ], + "161466795": [ + "Section 511", + "Section 376", + "Section 354", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 498A" + ], + "161482323": [ + "Section 500", + "Section 120" + ], + "161074393": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 326", + "Section 34" + ], + "161091275": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 379", + "Section 411" + ], + "161101136": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "161308308": [ + "Section 279", + "Section 304A" + ], + "161452566": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 173", + "Section 114" + ], + "161541269": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "160490011": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 342", + "Section 376", + "Section 323" + ], + "160497491": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 188", + "Section 332", + "Section 353", + "Section 504", + "Section 143", + "Section 147", + "Section 149" + ], + "160502863": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "160511648": [ + "Section 308", + "Section 506", + "Section 294" + ], + "160940010": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 323" + ], + "171815056": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 498" + ], + "1718159": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 420", + "Section 5", + "Section 120" + ], + "171818987": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 120" + ], + "171838819": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "177646387": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 406", + "Section 376", + "Section 420" + ], + "1776469": [ + "Section 161" + ], + "177649831": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "180173523": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 173", + "Section 504", + "Section 326", + "Section 148", + "Section 482", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 149", + "Section 325", + "Section 143", + "Section 147" + ], + "180184525": [ + "Section 366A", + "Section 366", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 437" + ], + "180194369": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 228", + "Section 188", + "Section 419", + "Section 193", + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 467" + ], + "166015014": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 498" + ], + "166042692": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 341", + "Section 307" + ], + "170575352": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 148" + ], + "170599450": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 149", + "Section 308", + "Section 506", + "Section 147", + "Section 313", + "Section 353", + "Section 304", + "Section 325", + "Section 148", + "Section 323" + ], + "170600015": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "170631290": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 120B", + "Section 193", + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 467" + ], + "170655801": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 384", + "Section 34" + ], + "172677024": [ + "Section 228", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 468" + ], + "1726804": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 420", + "Section 109", + "Section 120B" + ], + "172686359": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 395", + "Section 148", + "Section 332", + "Section 336", + "Section 109", + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 353", + "Section 174A", + "Section 341", + "Section 436", + "Section 147", + "Section 229A" + ], + "172698": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 307", + "Section 299", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 149" + ], + "172709316": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "17271954": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 294" + ], + "172791366": [ + "Section 447", + "Section 509", + "Section 354" + ], + "172813999": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 452", + "Section 302" + ], + "173466825": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "1794319": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 114" + ], + "179436086": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "179447623": [ + "Section 395", + "Section 34", + "Section 228", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 149", + "Section 109", + "Section 147", + "Section 148" + ], + "17945": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1832276": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 302", + "Section 324" + ], + "1832282": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 120B" + ], + "1832366": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 304A" + ], + "183238261": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A" + ], + "195849028": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 452", + "Section 354", + "Section 504", + "Section 324" + ], + "19584903": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 307", + "Section 498A", + "Section 325", + "Section 34" + ], + "195892148": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 307" + ], + "17350919": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 34", + "Section 308", + "Section 509", + "Section 354" + ], + "1735113": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 380" + ], + "173512": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 506" + ], + "1735184": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 415", + "Section 420" + ], + "173522060": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 364", + "Section 148", + "Section 506" + ], + "1735221": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471" + ], + "173539111": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 304", + "Section 34", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 302" + ], + "173617709": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 325" + ], + "173621864": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 379", + "Section 114" + ], + "173622227": [ + "Section 173", + "Section 482", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 120B", + "Section 427", + "Section 326", + "Section 324", + "Section 164" + ], + "173328808": [ + "Section 313", + "Section 376" + ], + "173456056": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 307", + "Section 34" + ], + "1735608": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "173638971": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "1737070": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34" + ], + "173737714": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 354", + "Section 498A", + "Section 325" + ], + "174057193": [ + "Section 120", + "Section 379" + ], + "174262638": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363" + ], + "173659427": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "17366582": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 120B", + "Section 506" + ], + "173672639": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 409" + ], + "173691067": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 324", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 506", + "Section 148" + ], + "1737054": [ + "Section 409" + ], + "174090274": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "1737537": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "173757847": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 427", + "Section 353", + "Section 149" + ], + "1738433": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 406", + "Section 467", + "Section 120B", + "Section 420" + ], + "173843416": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "173849578": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "173818176": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 34" + ], + "173971382": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 342" + ], + "173980479": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "173997839": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 147" + ], + "173999057": [ + "Section 509", + "Section 320" + ], + "17402234": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 420", + "Section 506" + ], + "174038184": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 341", + "Section 504", + "Section 34" + ], + "1740383": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 201" + ], + "174237441": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "174262416": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "174164014": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 452", + "Section 394", + "Section 323", + "Section 511" + ], + "1741748": [ + "Section 120B" + ], + "174450010": [ + "Section 332", + "Section 294", + "Section 186" + ], + "174469757": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 506", + "Section 188", + "Section 34" + ], + "1746557": [ + "Section 409" + ], + "174662908": [ + "Section 120", + "Section 380" + ], + "1746773": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B" + ], + "174177064": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "174186415": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 379", + "Section 411", + "Section 34" + ], + "174326851": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 143" + ], + "174330091": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "174265985": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 300", + "Section 326", + "Section 323", + "Section 143", + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "174272489": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 471" + ], + "174272833": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 452" + ], + "1742772": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "174284987": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 294" + ], + "174385907": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 34", + "Section 307" + ], + "1743953": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 482", + "Section 190", + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 156" + ], + "174424716": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 457", + "Section 294" + ], + "174511": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 494" + ], + "1745827": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 302" + ], + "174598055": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 34", + "Section 107" + ], + "174629266": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 437" + ], + "174629877": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 498A", + "Section 307", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 155", + "Section 482", + "Section 156" + ], + "174631479": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 394" + ], + "174637255": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 120B", + "Section 376", + "Section 420", + "Section 156" + ], + "174638644": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 498" + ], + "165856908": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 438", + "Section 294" + ], + "169231047": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 506" + ], + "174694564": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 323" + ], + "174702009": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 506", + "Section 147" + ], + "174705215": [ + "Section 5", + "Section 506" + ], + "1747590": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "174773039": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "1748937": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 436", + "Section 149" + ], + "17490220": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 323" + ], + "174910686": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 409", + "Section 411", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 120", + "Section 307" + ], + "174830221": [ + "Section 308", + "Section 363", + "Section 376" + ], + "1748646": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 34", + "Section 304", + "Section 299" + ], + "174997278": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 394", + "Section 395", + "Section 379" + ], + "174974183": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 395", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 397", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "174941302": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 506" + ], + "1749449": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 307" + ], + "1749453": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 417" + ], + "1749460": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 419", + "Section 420", + "Section 467" + ], + "1749566": [ + "Section 409" + ], + "1750265": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 302" + ], + "175038742": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120", + "Section 201" + ], + "175045089": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 380", + "Section 457" + ], + "175049772": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "175261893": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 294" + ], + "175262621": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "175262904": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 353", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 320" + ], + "175266103": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 4" + ], + "1752758": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300" + ], + "175465820": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "175466096": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 341", + "Section 320" + ], + "1754883": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 325", + "Section 147", + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 107" + ], + "176287970": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 353", + "Section 147", + "Section 506", + "Section 148" + ], + "176298447": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 379" + ], + "176301816": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 323" + ], + "176302306": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306" + ], + "1763112": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 173", + "Section 448", + "Section 341", + "Section 326" + ], + "175559173": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 498" + ], + "175522767": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 120B", + "Section 511", + "Section 201", + "Section 341", + "Section 307" + ], + "175318544": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 148" + ], + "1753228": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 427", + "Section 294" + ], + "175340460": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 155", + "Section 156" + ], + "175597275": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 452" + ], + "17560101": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "1756173": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 148" + ], + "175622126": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 120B", + "Section 409", + "Section 302", + "Section 504", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 389" + ], + "17562824": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 2", + "Section 147", + "Section 427", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 149" + ], + "175630986": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "175632174": [ + "Section 13" + ], + "175766105": [ + "Section 201" + ], + "175785313": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 325", + "Section 308", + "Section 34", + "Section 438" + ], + "1758288": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 34", + "Section 366" + ], + "175836057": [ + "Section 389" + ], + "1758451": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 109", + "Section 366", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 363" + ], + "1757117": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 326" + ], + "1757342": [ + "Section 201" + ], + "175752578": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "1753185": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "175490899": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 376", + "Section 354" + ], + "175882798": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 307", + "Section 341" + ], + "1758852": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 366", + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 397", + "Section 379" + ], + "175886904": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 341", + "Section 325" + ], + "175891586": [ + "Section 389", + "Section 366", + "Section 376", + "Section 375", + "Section 307" + ], + "175903641": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 427", + "Section 148", + "Section 380", + "Section 504", + "Section 376", + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 304", + "Section 506", + "Section 294", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 448", + "Section 417" + ], + "175904451": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 323" + ], + "175924412": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302" + ], + "175136636": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 450", + "Section 376" + ], + "175141780": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 34" + ], + "175142317": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 354", + "Section 324", + "Section 448" + ], + "1751852": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "17519259": [ + "Section 389" + ], + "17519706": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "1752004": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341" + ], + "175212727": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 320" + ], + "175368535": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "175385545": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 294" + ], + "175388330": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 427", + "Section 506" + ], + "1753926": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 437", + "Section 34", + "Section 173", + "Section 164", + "Section 323", + "Section 200", + "Section 161", + "Section 341" + ], + "175393940": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 34", + "Section 342", + "Section 420", + "Section 353", + "Section 341", + "Section 471", + "Section 186" + ], + "175397617": [ + "Section 304B" + ], + "1759662": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 306" + ], + "175991760": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 307", + "Section 363" + ], + "176008782": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "176015307": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 498", + "Section 506", + "Section 406" + ], + "176236": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 341", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 323" + ], + "176334278": [ + "Section 511", + "Section 306", + "Section 107", + "Section 506", + "Section 109", + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 498A" + ], + "176343198": [ + "Section 332", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "176364013": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 365", + "Section 34", + "Section 509", + "Section 354", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "176376309": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 307" + ], + "176418023": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 397", + "Section 201" + ], + "176421": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 450", + "Section 323" + ], + "17642384": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 4", + "Section 2" + ], + "176493192": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 363", + "Section 201", + "Section 376" + ], + "176496088": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 143", + "Section 188", + "Section 186", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "176507300": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "1765136": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 411", + "Section 4" + ], + "1765175": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 156" + ], + "176517768": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 320" + ], + "176689094": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 452", + "Section 120B" + ], + "176695878": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 392", + "Section 302", + "Section 164", + "Section 313", + "Section 299" + ], + "1767002": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 307", + "Section 325", + "Section 148" + ], + "176701009": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 436", + "Section 341" + ], + "176712503": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "176717933": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 326", + "Section 34" + ], + "1767227": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 34" + ], + "1767237": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 304A" + ], + "176771355": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 325" + ], + "176775359": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 302", + "Section 380", + "Section 457", + "Section 397" + ], + "176830369": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "176840729": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 448" + ], + "176841275": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 450", + "Section 34" + ], + "176862": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 34" + ], + "176893787": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 34", + "Section 447", + "Section 307", + "Section 427", + "Section 326" + ], + "176896052": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 326", + "Section 325", + "Section 324" + ], + "1771197": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 376" + ], + "177150445": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 324", + "Section 109", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 341", + "Section 325" + ], + "177171654": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 294", + "Section 323", + "Section 325" + ], + "177175306": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 366", + "Section 363" + ], + "1770667": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 511", + "Section 308", + "Section 300" + ], + "1770765": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 468", + "Section 406", + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 467" + ], + "1770801": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 326" + ], + "177278651": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "1772812": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "177283139": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "1772912": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 397" + ], + "17724919": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 376", + "Section 420" + ], + "1772562": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 326", + "Section 149", + "Section 148" + ], + "177263205": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 498A", + "Section 504", + "Section 193", + "Section 511", + "Section 506", + "Section 376" + ], + "177268599": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34", + "Section 420" + ], + "1768129": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 338", + "Section 279", + "Section 300", + "Section 299" + ], + "176853597": [ + "Section 143", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 294", + "Section 323" + ], + "17698500": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 120B", + "Section 394", + "Section 392" + ], + "177009431": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 406", + "Section 392", + "Section 379", + "Section 468", + "Section 471" + ], + "177628590": [ + "Section 511", + "Section 376", + "Section 354", + "Section 506", + "Section 120B", + "Section 504", + "Section 323" + ], + "177662059": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 406" + ], + "1774622": [ + "Section 313" + ], + "177471654": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 437", + "Section 354" + ], + "177488063": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 173", + "Section 447" + ], + "177492651": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107", + "Section 323" + ], + "177515111": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 506", + "Section 509" + ], + "1769453": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "176962395": [ + "Section 452" + ], + "177373907": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 307" + ], + "177386359": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "1775283": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "177568517": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 120B", + "Section 471", + "Section 34" + ], + "177579139": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "177610035": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 147" + ], + "177627906": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 302" + ], + "177669178": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 186", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "177673196": [ + "Section 395", + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 392", + "Section 427", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 379", + "Section 302", + "Section 504", + "Section 452", + "Section 186", + "Section 506", + "Section 457", + "Section 201", + "Section 336", + "Section 380", + "Section 332" + ], + "177685547": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 299", + "Section 34", + "Section 143" + ], + "177691197": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 147", + "Section 427", + "Section 149" + ], + "1776971": [ + "Section 364", + "Section 302", + "Section 279", + "Section 363" + ], + "1778437": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 325", + "Section 323" + ], + "17787879": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 147" + ], + "179124968": [ + "Section 338", + "Section 304A", + "Section 279" + ], + "179231798": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 294" + ], + "179426484": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "179506729": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 120B" + ], + "178384055": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "178392743": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "177976401": [ + "Section 436", + "Section 376", + "Section 457", + "Section 34" + ], + "177990679": [ + "Section 320", + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 338", + "Section 149" + ], + "178009674": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "1780107": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 201", + "Section 380", + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 457", + "Section 366A", + "Section 109", + "Section 366" + ], + "178012": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "1780160": [ + "Section 190", + "Section 200", + "Section 392", + "Section 397", + "Section 482" + ], + "178021096": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 465", + "Section 468", + "Section 13" + ], + "178231775": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 341", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 506" + ], + "178234997": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 304" + ], + "1782376": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 304", + "Section 34" + ], + "1782717": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 120", + "Section 120B" + ], + "17828313": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 420", + "Section 438", + "Section 307" + ], + "178293998": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 365", + "Section 363", + "Section 438", + "Section 164" + ], + "178297664": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 452", + "Section 149", + "Section 161" + ], + "1782998": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 228" + ], + "178094355": [ + "Section 4", + "Section 3" + ], + "178100271": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 323", + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 294", + "Section 147", + "Section 336" + ], + "17811003": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302" + ], + "178127142": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 324", + "Section 341" + ], + "178149647": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 120B", + "Section 109" + ], + "17815500": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 308", + "Section 452", + "Section 323", + "Section 326", + "Section 307" + ], + "178162745": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 450" + ], + "1783374": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 326", + "Section 300", + "Section 304" + ], + "178356851": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 34" + ], + "1783656": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 411", + "Section 302" + ], + "178373568": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 366" + ], + "178562234": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1785874": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 504", + "Section 34", + "Section 452" + ], + "178597190": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 148", + "Section 394", + "Section 147" + ], + "178599379": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 498" + ], + "178697348": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A" + ], + "1787029": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 409", + "Section 468", + "Section 164", + "Section 471", + "Section 173", + "Section 161", + "Section 228", + "Section 397" + ], + "178706683": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 324" + ], + "178726791": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "1787404": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 420" + ], + "178741681": [ + "Section 494", + "Section 452", + "Section 323", + "Section 506" + ], + "178933191": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 341", + "Section 307" + ], + "1789657": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 326", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 304" + ], + "178968130": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 34" + ], + "1788107": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 325", + "Section 326", + "Section 323", + "Section 302", + "Section 324" + ], + "1788140": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "179097612": [ + "Section 188" + ], + "17910918": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 320" + ], + "179112638": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1791179": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 147", + "Section 148" + ], + "179124918": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 380", + "Section 448", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 147", + "Section 427", + "Section 323", + "Section 420", + "Section 457", + "Section 447", + "Section 406", + "Section 384", + "Section 342", + "Section 467", + "Section 409" + ], + "178448786": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1784527": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 120", + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 34" + ], + "178458039": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "178464414": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 409" + ], + "179175632": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 397", + "Section 394" + ], + "1792650": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 324" + ], + "1792788": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "17930055": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 380", + "Section 34" + ], + "179384468": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 34" + ], + "179391016": [ + "Section 107", + "Section 467", + "Section 34", + "Section 471" + ], + "1793916": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 302", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 34" + ], + "1794819": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 337", + "Section 279", + "Section 300", + "Section 299" + ], + "1794916": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 498A", + "Section 307" + ], + "179494275": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 506", + "Section 467", + "Section 406", + "Section 438" + ], + "179501": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 506", + "Section 308", + "Section 324" + ], + "179539960": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 148", + "Section 452", + "Section 149", + "Section 506", + "Section 304", + "Section 325", + "Section 300" + ], + "179648704": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 341", + "Section 323" + ], + "1796558": [ + "Section 500", + "Section 5" + ], + "179657171": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 467", + "Section 379", + "Section 468", + "Section 341", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 420", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "179661646": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 120B", + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 34" + ], + "17961107": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 302" + ], + "1796205": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 354", + "Section 366", + "Section 376", + "Section 392" + ], + "179762373": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 325", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 341", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 143" + ], + "179779995": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1797825": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 326", + "Section 427", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 324", + "Section 448", + "Section 304", + "Section 341", + "Section 325", + "Section 447" + ], + "179784769": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 438" + ], + "179789048": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 353", + "Section 341" + ], + "179790": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 149" + ], + "1797912": [ + "Section 313", + "Section 302", + "Section 161" + ], + "1798010": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "180779138": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 307" + ], + "18079118": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 306" + ], + "180800247": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 320" + ], + "179713280": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 506", + "Section 448" + ], + "179714080": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 437" + ], + "179720922": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 323", + "Section 326", + "Section 307" + ], + "179747541": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 363" + ], + "1797476": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 161" + ], + "179750624": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1798157": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "179823330": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 504", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "179835841": [ + "Section 452" + ], + "1798360": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "179853163": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 148" + ], + "179857573": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 302", + "Section 364", + "Section 365", + "Section 363" + ], + "179858453": [ + "Section 389" + ], + "179872306": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 307", + "Section 326", + "Section 313", + "Section 506", + "Section 341" + ], + "184398": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "184410460": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "1844186": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 294", + "Section 107" + ], + "1798963": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A" + ], + "179900325": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 279" + ], + "1800890": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 337", + "Section 279" + ], + "180110980": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 353", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 364", + "Section 365", + "Section 354" + ], + "1801122": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "180112594": [ + "Section 494", + "Section 109" + ], + "1801212": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1801241": [ + "Section 342", + "Section 392", + "Section 397" + ], + "180126649": [ + "Section 511", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 465", + "Section 468" + ], + "18014450": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 149" + ], + "1801472": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 342" + ], + "1801562": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 353", + "Section 307" + ], + "180156358": [ + "Section 2", + "Section 34", + "Section 392" + ], + "1799828": [ + "Section 120B" + ], + "179992951": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 406", + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 120B" + ], + "180002000": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 506" + ], + "1800350": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 302" + ], + "180275795": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B" + ], + "180285005": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 304B" + ], + "180036736": [ + "Section 457", + "Section 380", + "Section 411", + "Section 511", + "Section 114", + "Section 379" + ], + "1805227": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 307", + "Section 120B", + "Section 324", + "Section 342" + ], + "180201203": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 482", + "Section 420", + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 323" + ], + "180220230": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 506" + ], + "180241808": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 294" + ], + "180504025": [ + "Section 143", + "Section 353", + "Section 188", + "Section 186" + ], + "180518356": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 307", + "Section 452", + "Section 504", + "Section 482", + "Section 353", + "Section 308", + "Section 506" + ], + "180522017": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A", + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 409", + "Section 467" + ], + "180522032": [ + "Section 193", + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 2" + ], + "1805224": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 34", + "Section 465", + "Section 420" + ], + "18045300": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 306", + "Section 324", + "Section 504", + "Section 498A" + ], + "180471548": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "180473569": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 323", + "Section 506" + ], + "18089311": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 498", + "Section 326", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "181138426": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "181138886": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "181143016": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "1811514": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "1803697": [ + "Section 395", + "Section 147", + "Section 437", + "Section 149", + "Section 406", + "Section 304", + "Section 323", + "Section 452" + ], + "180374877": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467" + ], + "1803885": [ + "Section 120B" + ], + "18030076": [ + "Section 380" + ], + "180302052": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "180302853": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 438" + ], + "180428715": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 149", + "Section 304", + "Section 325", + "Section 148", + "Section 324", + "Section 336" + ], + "1804308": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 120" + ], + "180435443": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "180447416": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 304B" + ], + "180575693": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "1805776": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 201", + "Section 395", + "Section 397", + "Section 307" + ], + "1807187": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 201", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 326" + ], + "180721369": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1807253": [ + "Section 201" + ], + "180726880": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 341", + "Section 389", + "Section 332", + "Section 149" + ], + "180728816": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 511" + ], + "180737799": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 164" + ], + "1807544": [ + "Section 375", + "Section 376", + "Section 366" + ], + "180816684": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 324" + ], + "180855148": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 323", + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 337", + "Section 147", + "Section 336", + "Section 148", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 427", + "Section 143" + ], + "180856344": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "180889309": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 506" + ], + "1809344": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 420", + "Section 506", + "Section 148" + ], + "180936127": [ + "Section 457", + "Section 380", + "Section 482", + "Section 427", + "Section 34", + "Section 341" + ], + "180939830": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 511" + ], + "180950424": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 354", + "Section 438", + "Section 448", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "1811741": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "181175915": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 420" + ], + "181207661": [ + "Section 143", + "Section 147", + "Section 149", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 353", + "Section 341" + ], + "1812251": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 304" + ], + "181285136": [ + "Section 452" + ], + "181291136": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 304" + ], + "181292": [ + "Section 409" + ], + "181361754": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 186" + ], + "1813656": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 323" + ], + "1813671": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 307" + ], + "181368048": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 34" + ], + "181436770": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 468" + ], + "181439": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 323" + ], + "1815287": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 482", + "Section 395", + "Section 149", + "Section 397", + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 406", + "Section 307" + ], + "18147282": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 467", + "Section 307", + "Section 468", + "Section 379", + "Section 201", + "Section 465", + "Section 392", + "Section 365" + ], + "181476873": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 438" + ], + "181538859": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "181732013": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 324" + ], + "181659338": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "181677712": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 326", + "Section 341", + "Section 411", + "Section 2" + ], + "181684199": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 365", + "Section 120B", + "Section 376" + ], + "181687201": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 34", + "Section 156", + "Section 200", + "Section 149", + "Section 161", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 448", + "Section 395", + "Section 173", + "Section 4" + ], + "181690086": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 294", + "Section 506" + ], + "181705348": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 120B" + ], + "1817727": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 506" + ], + "181772929": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 411", + "Section 379" + ], + "181815525": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "1815755": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 302" + ], + "1815829": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 109", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 304" + ], + "181755033": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 161" + ], + "181763232": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A" + ], + "1818703": [ + "Section 13", + "Section 3", + "Section 409", + "Section 120B", + "Section 5", + "Section 4" + ], + "181879763": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "181888832": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 341", + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "181902": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 302" + ], + "181902536": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "181910803": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "1819204": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 109", + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 411", + "Section 409", + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 447", + "Section 193" + ], + "182037443": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 34" + ], + "182049769": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 326", + "Section 143", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "181742696": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 3" + ], + "182321602": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 323" + ], + "182412404": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 419", + "Section 376" + ], + "18252079": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "182732138": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 341", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 342", + "Section 427", + "Section 149" + ], + "181965732": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 304", + "Section 143", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 427", + "Section 504", + "Section 452", + "Section 109", + "Section 506", + "Section 341", + "Section 147", + "Section 323" + ], + "1819854": [ + "Section 2", + "Section 147" + ], + "1819987": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 201", + "Section 164", + "Section 307", + "Section 364" + ], + "182016545": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 107", + "Section 498" + ], + "1820186": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 465", + "Section 471", + "Section 120", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 448" + ], + "182108468": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 411", + "Section 392", + "Section 229A" + ], + "182127956": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "182138314": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 3", + "Section 392", + "Section 397" + ], + "182147350": [ + "Section 304A" + ], + "182151": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "182163059": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 107", + "Section 304B" + ], + "182183292": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 427", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 504", + "Section 143", + "Section 147" + ], + "182185436": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 300" + ], + "18224003": [ + "Section 447", + "Section 506", + "Section 324", + "Section 323" + ], + "182271010": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 376", + "Section 437" + ], + "182271596": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 365", + "Section 384", + "Section 506", + "Section 325", + "Section 34" + ], + "182336183": [ + "Section 494", + "Section 34" + ], + "182338794": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 364", + "Section 365" + ], + "1823635": [ + "Section 482" + ], + "182398193": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 452", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 427" + ], + "182400832": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 325" + ], + "182496845": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 34" + ], + "1826426": [ + "Section 395" + ], + "1826903": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 323" + ], + "1827163": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "182902044": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "182922505": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 34" + ], + "182938563": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 447", + "Section 109", + "Section 325" + ], + "183699606": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "18370671": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 307", + "Section 448", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "183711516": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 437" + ], + "183719775": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 376" + ], + "182954720": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 438" + ], + "182957979": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 307", + "Section 34" + ], + "183077363": [ + "Section 200", + "Section 506", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "183079610": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 341" + ], + "183079717": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 294", + "Section 34" + ], + "183080038": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 341" + ], + "183085265": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 294" + ], + "183089298": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 120B", + "Section 411" + ], + "183139012": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "183158209": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 201", + "Section 109", + "Section 376", + "Section 420", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "183160534": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 452", + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "183163401": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 109", + "Section 114" + ], + "18337401": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 300" + ], + "1834174": [ + "Section 494" + ], + "1833049": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 376", + "Section 302", + "Section 366", + "Section 511", + "Section 313" + ], + "183307155": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 308", + "Section 324" + ], + "183314923": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 506" + ], + "1833307": [ + "Section 5" + ], + "183341217": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 437", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 190", + "Section 427" + ], + "183354460": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1833640": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 161" + ], + "183025316": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1830465": [ + "Section 200", + "Section 120B" + ], + "183068277": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 324", + "Section 506" + ], + "1835140": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 397" + ], + "1835527": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "183560542": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 294" + ], + "183577068": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "1835889": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 366", + "Section 313" + ], + "1837564": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 342", + "Section 341" + ], + "184391623": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 308", + "Section 326", + "Section 307", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 452", + "Section 379", + "Section 447" + ], + "1834763": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 417", + "Section 109", + "Section 447", + "Section 342", + "Section 323", + "Section 375", + "Section 341" + ], + "183496711": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 406" + ], + "183674816": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 437" + ], + "18372689": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "1837331": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 148", + "Section 149" + ], + "183733459": [ + "Section 457", + "Section 294", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "183745295": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "18374922": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "183811689": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 341", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "183851366": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 324", + "Section 341", + "Section 325", + "Section 307", + "Section 2" + ], + "1838567": [ + "Section 107", + "Section 114", + "Section 323", + "Section 353" + ], + "183877524": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 341" + ], + "1841867": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 2" + ], + "184201603": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "184215343": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 143" + ], + "184228129": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1840378": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 447", + "Section 143", + "Section 114" + ], + "18405074": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 438" + ], + "1840690": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 34", + "Section 409", + "Section 155", + "Section 482", + "Section 420", + "Section 415" + ], + "1840714": [ + "Section 337", + "Section 338", + "Section 279", + "Section 304A" + ], + "184085434": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 120B", + "Section 411", + "Section 420", + "Section 419", + "Section 201" + ], + "184085485": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 324", + "Section 341", + "Section 323" + ], + "183935955": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 3", + "Section 34" + ], + "1839434": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 366", + "Section 504", + "Section 307", + "Section 395", + "Section 304", + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 397", + "Section 324", + "Section 411", + "Section 306", + "Section 149", + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 498A", + "Section 147", + "Section 354", + "Section 452" + ], + "184268381": [ + "Section 498A" + ], + "184268749": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "1842720": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 392" + ], + "184285063": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 504", + "Section 34" + ], + "184285267": [ + "Section 173", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 409", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467", + "Section 34" + ], + "184293207": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 409", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 465", + "Section 419", + "Section 107", + "Section 406", + "Section 468", + "Section 3", + "Section 417" + ], + "184351298": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 120B" + ], + "1843652": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 395", + "Section 304", + "Section 397", + "Section 376", + "Section 307", + "Section 325", + "Section 3", + "Section 324", + "Section 452", + "Section 411" + ], + "184380797": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1845495": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 149" + ], + "184566707": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 320", + "Section 482", + "Section 323", + "Section 406", + "Section 506" + ], + "184577421": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 323", + "Section 452" + ], + "184585254": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 365" + ], + "184587578": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "184438150": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 341", + "Section 147", + "Section 324" + ], + "184449972": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 300", + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 2", + "Section 299" + ], + "184462": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 200" + ], + "184466220": [ + "Section 5" + ], + "1844895": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302", + "Section 300" + ], + "184496574": [ + "Section 436", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 452" + ], + "184497512": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 325", + "Section 511", + "Section 342", + "Section 354", + "Section 332" + ], + "184499843": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 342", + "Section 506" + ], + "184501693": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 228", + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 419", + "Section 467" + ], + "18462221": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 498A", + "Section 308", + "Section 506" + ], + "1846411": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "1846664": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 302", + "Section 411" + ], + "184696037": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 379", + "Section 341", + "Section 325", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "184728652": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "184734947": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 307", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 300" + ], + "186813230": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 482" + ], + "187010340": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 336", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 307", + "Section 341" + ], + "187239749": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "185144198": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 120" + ], + "185152887": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 506", + "Section 504" + ], + "185165739": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 395", + "Section 34" + ], + "1851809": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "184780823": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "184814697": [ + "Section 229A" + ], + "1848549": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 34" + ], + "1864845": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 465", + "Section 120B" + ], + "184931094": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498" + ], + "184932426": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 341", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 397" + ], + "184943915": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 376", + "Section 417", + "Section 506", + "Section 3" + ], + "184956475": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 498", + "Section 304B" + ], + "185026298": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 148" + ], + "185036705": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 406", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1850573": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 304", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 299" + ], + "185067574": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 13" + ], + "185279625": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "185285369": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 436", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 379", + "Section 427", + "Section 149" + ], + "185300": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 3", + "Section 148", + "Section 332", + "Section 2" + ], + "185259": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302" + ], + "1854030": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 304B", + "Section 325" + ], + "185359190": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "185364284": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "185368437": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "18536860": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 452", + "Section 506" + ], + "185540347": [ + "Section 375", + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 376" + ], + "185444152": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 120B" + ], + "185449014": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 294" + ], + "1854829": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 324" + ], + "1855008": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 307", + "Section 411", + "Section 120B" + ], + "185505680": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 450" + ], + "185616691": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "185627098": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406" + ], + "1855856": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 302" + ], + "185586439": [ + "Section 143", + "Section 341", + "Section 304" + ], + "185609172": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 304" + ], + "1860363": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 427", + "Section 149", + "Section 341", + "Section 452", + "Section 302", + "Section 332" + ], + "1864190": [ + "Section 338" + ], + "185799906": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 482" + ], + "1858104": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 34" + ], + "1857711": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 500" + ], + "1857808": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 337" + ], + "18581622": [ + "Section 420" + ], + "1858566": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 452" + ], + "185862815": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 411", + "Section 120B", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 438" + ], + "1858633": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 302" + ], + "185951007": [ + "Section 389" + ], + "185951066": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 504" + ], + "18595913": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "186158641": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 34" + ], + "186165894": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 164" + ], + "1861862": [ + "Section 107", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 161" + ], + "186201": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 302" + ], + "18623572": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 366" + ], + "186305": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 306", + "Section 34", + "Section 342", + "Section 193", + "Section 120", + "Section 5" + ], + "186305987": [ + "Section 279", + "Section 304", + "Section 337" + ], + "186350374": [ + "Section 155", + "Section 156", + "Section 506", + "Section 190", + "Section 34", + "Section 504", + "Section 500" + ], + "1863536": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 147" + ], + "1863569": [ + "Section 5" + ], + "1863698": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 324", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 326" + ], + "186372136": [ + "Section 5", + "Section 468", + "Section 420" + ], + "1863784": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 120", + "Section 148", + "Section 506" + ], + "1864997": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "1865298": [ + "Section 384", + "Section 342", + "Section 506", + "Section 149", + "Section 498A", + "Section 406" + ], + "186664450": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306" + ], + "186670583": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 427", + "Section 323", + "Section 341", + "Section 34" + ], + "1866756": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 313", + "Section 506", + "Section 366" + ], + "186686462": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 120B", + "Section 109", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 143", + "Section 4" + ], + "18662890": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 498A" + ], + "186637350": [ + "Section 500", + "Section 384" + ], + "1867323": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 304", + "Section 326", + "Section 336", + "Section 337" + ], + "186734143": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 143", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 304", + "Section 326", + "Section 325", + "Section 504" + ], + "186745862": [ + "Section 4", + "Section 3" + ], + "186849574": [ + "Section 120B" + ], + "1868525": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302" + ], + "186786166": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 419" + ], + "186797012": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 302", + "Section 392", + "Section 3", + "Section 323" + ], + "1868019": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "18701658": [ + "Section 228", + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 120" + ], + "1870263": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 427", + "Section 107", + "Section 394" + ], + "187034258": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120" + ], + "1880223": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 465", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 120B" + ], + "188030394": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 201" + ], + "1869377": [ + "Section 409" + ], + "187001382": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 320", + "Section 300", + "Section 326" + ], + "18704198": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 324" + ], + "187045234": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 468", + "Section 308" + ], + "1870696": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 302", + "Section 2" + ], + "18707672": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 120B", + "Section 468", + "Section 467" + ], + "187081169": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 427", + "Section 395", + "Section 148", + "Section 332", + "Section 336", + "Section 109", + "Section 307", + "Section 353", + "Section 341", + "Section 436", + "Section 147", + "Section 149" + ], + "1872466": [ + "Section 4", + "Section 498", + "Section 366", + "Section 376", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 366A", + "Section 147" + ], + "187252324": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 376" + ], + "187269523": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 34" + ], + "187343943": [ + "Section 120", + "Section 498" + ], + "187354038": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 397", + "Section 392", + "Section 427", + "Section 394", + "Section 336", + "Section 436", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 147", + "Section 353", + "Section 148", + "Section 457", + "Section 447", + "Section 323", + "Section 380" + ], + "187359172": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 506", + "Section 406" + ], + "187396052": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 506", + "Section 438" + ], + "187703177": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 34", + "Section 438", + "Section 448", + "Section 326" + ], + "1877065": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 363", + "Section 384" + ], + "187708265": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 3", + "Section 34" + ], + "187713935": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 482", + "Section 320", + "Section 34" + ], + "187715990": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 415" + ], + "1877494": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "187974995": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 465", + "Section 420", + "Section 419", + "Section 406" + ], + "188005953": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107" + ], + "188008002": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 307" + ], + "1880087": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 376", + "Section 342", + "Section 375", + "Section 363" + ], + "1884222": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 304", + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 299", + "Section 34" + ], + "18842657": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "1884335": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 2" + ], + "188447519": [ + "Section 306" + ], + "188708263": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 294", + "Section 392" + ], + "1887152": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 300" + ], + "188856184": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 34", + "Section 363", + "Section 164" + ], + "187339105": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 34", + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 509", + "Section 294", + "Section 420", + "Section 5", + "Section 325" + ], + "187589": [ + "Section 313", + "Section 2", + "Section 465", + "Section 332", + "Section 427", + "Section 307" + ], + "187596839": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 302", + "Section 107", + "Section 409", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 411" + ], + "187341759": [ + "Section 228", + "Section 409", + "Section 482", + "Section 306", + "Section 406", + "Section 107", + "Section 397", + "Section 173", + "Section 34", + "Section 313" + ], + "187700450": [ + "Section 511", + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 498A" + ], + "187850002": [ + "Section 482" + ], + "187973": [ + "Section 498A" + ], + "18764280": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 120B" + ], + "187663": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 147" + ], + "1876661": [ + "Section 395", + "Section 397" + ], + "187670954": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 379" + ], + "187796426": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 438" + ], + "187806821": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 34", + "Section 447", + "Section 354", + "Section 438", + "Section 323" + ], + "187807399": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 161", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 164", + "Section 471" + ], + "1878230": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 325", + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 313" + ], + "187829723": [ + "Section 384", + "Section 120B" + ], + "187844037": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 304" + ], + "1880655": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 452", + "Section 436", + "Section 148", + "Section 34", + "Section 457", + "Section 380", + "Section 147" + ], + "188079545": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B" + ], + "1880833": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 143", + "Section 3", + "Section 324", + "Section 506" + ], + "188364164": [ + "Section 498A" + ], + "188373715": [ + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 447", + "Section 341", + "Section 427" + ], + "188373943": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 326", + "Section 452", + "Section 506", + "Section 324", + "Section 320" + ], + "188381689": [ + "Section 437", + "Section 307", + "Section 294" + ], + "188405832": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 427", + "Section 34" + ], + "188410115": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 504", + "Section 353", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "1881559": [ + "Section 313", + "Section 302", + "Section 161" + ], + "188163114": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "188181910": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 452" + ], + "188191818": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 438", + "Section 326" + ], + "189523537": [ + "Section 229A" + ], + "189836654": [ + "Section 419", + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 468" + ], + "190006054": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 411", + "Section 120B", + "Section 447" + ], + "188297192": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 365", + "Section 506", + "Section 120B" + ], + "1883071": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 149", + "Section 308", + "Section 307" + ], + "1883078": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 313", + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "188307877": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 307" + ], + "188316747": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "1884883": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 302" + ], + "18848932": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 447", + "Section 323", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 353", + "Section 452" + ], + "188505893": [ + "Section 457", + "Section 394", + "Section 120B", + "Section 307", + "Section 397", + "Section 380" + ], + "188449682": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "188469207": [ + "Section 156", + "Section 325", + "Section 504", + "Section 323" + ], + "188742365": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 34" + ], + "1887507": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 482", + "Section 511" + ], + "1886438": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 326", + "Section 307", + "Section 313" + ], + "1886518": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 500", + "Section 506", + "Section 109" + ], + "1887699": [ + "Section 188" + ], + "188803413": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "188805958": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 120B", + "Section 471", + "Section 419", + "Section 420" + ], + "1888111": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 324" + ], + "189002716": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 511" + ], + "1890163": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 447", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467", + "Section 409" + ], + "188899544": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "1889066": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B" + ], + "189216604": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 120B", + "Section 120", + "Section 307", + "Section 427", + "Section 323", + "Section 506" + ], + "189233": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 120B", + "Section 482", + "Section 389", + "Section 379", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "189240571": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 300" + ], + "189186940": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 325", + "Section 506" + ], + "189199": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B" + ], + "18921100": [ + "Section 419", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 467" + ], + "189064327": [ + "Section 337", + "Section 34", + "Section 279", + "Section 406", + "Section 498A" + ], + "189103187": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "189111059": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 308", + "Section 341", + "Section 320" + ], + "1892868": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 397", + "Section 392" + ], + "18930933": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 302", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 201", + "Section 304", + "Section 498" + ], + "1893439": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 511" + ], + "1893521": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 379" + ], + "189364006": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 342" + ], + "1893686": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "189374763": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 376" + ], + "1897981": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467", + "Section 468" + ], + "1898332": [ + "Section 498A" + ], + "189519238": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "189523282": [ + "Section 365", + "Section 201", + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "189442877": [ + "Section 450", + "Section 506" + ], + "189445130": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "189457853": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "189457936": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 342", + "Section 376" + ], + "1895452": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 465", + "Section 471", + "Section 406", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467" + ], + "189553518": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 149", + "Section 302" + ], + "189560": [ + "Section 190", + "Section 149", + "Section 143", + "Section 307", + "Section 109", + "Section 120B", + "Section 395", + "Section 452", + "Section 147", + "Section 148" + ], + "189657": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 120B", + "Section 364", + "Section 363", + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 379", + "Section 468", + "Section 325", + "Section 323" + ], + "1892427": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 120B", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 324" + ], + "1892438": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 307" + ], + "189467": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "1894735": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 341", + "Section 384", + "Section 506", + "Section 457", + "Section 427", + "Section 380" + ], + "189478635": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 354" + ], + "1896906": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 506" + ], + "1896990": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 364", + "Section 304B", + "Section 302" + ], + "190417873": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 392", + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 336" + ], + "190435467": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 147" + ], + "190442612": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 427", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 447" + ], + "1904577": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 427", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "189849660": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 201", + "Section 34" + ], + "189857912": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "189859543": [ + "Section 389" + ], + "189865298": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 147", + "Section 307", + "Section 353", + "Section 326", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 149" + ], + "189972898": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 120B" + ], + "189922275": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 406", + "Section 498A", + "Section 306" + ], + "189928": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 306", + "Section 498A", + "Section 313" + ], + "1899457": [ + "Section 313", + "Section 304", + "Section 304A", + "Section 338", + "Section 337", + "Section 342", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 299", + "Section 376" + ], + "189947089": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 341" + ], + "1900092": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 447", + "Section 147" + ], + "190011652": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 294" + ], + "190032625": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "190033819": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 364" + ], + "190148134": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 465", + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B" + ], + "190149310": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "190275221": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A" + ], + "190292129": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 143" + ], + "190292785": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 468" + ], + "190300726": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 34" + ], + "1903015": [ + "Section 409" + ], + "190560": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 148" + ], + "1905737": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34" + ], + "1905739": [ + "Section 143", + "Section 366" + ], + "190255388": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 341", + "Section 366A" + ], + "19049110": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 417" + ], + "190496387": [ + "Section 450", + "Section 397" + ], + "190525930": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 395", + "Section 397", + "Section 394" + ], + "1906118": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 326", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 143", + "Section 504", + "Section 506" + ], + "1906165": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "190630181": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 482" + ], + "19063950": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 376" + ], + "190690542": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 471" + ], + "190705068": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 420" + ], + "190713127": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 438", + "Section 448", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "1907199": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 34", + "Section 342", + "Section 300" + ], + "190721934": [ + "Section 436", + "Section 437" + ], + "1907325": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 149", + "Section 341", + "Section 148", + "Section 302" + ], + "190734565": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 34", + "Section 304", + "Section 149", + "Section 147" + ], + "190739039": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 341" + ], + "19075552": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 156" + ], + "190820979": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 341", + "Section 394", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 392", + "Section 427", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 336" + ], + "190826642": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 498A" + ], + "19083806": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 406" + ], + "190846364": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "190982517": [ + "Section 308", + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 452", + "Section 342" + ], + "191010953": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 384", + "Section 34" + ], + "19101650": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 294" + ], + "190928312": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 452", + "Section 300", + "Section 304", + "Section 323", + "Section 313" + ], + "1910919": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "1910305": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 148" + ], + "191039614": [ + "Section 380", + "Section 149", + "Section 427", + "Section 448", + "Section 148", + "Section 436", + "Section 302" + ], + "1910407": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "191052593": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "19106639": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 120B", + "Section 448" + ], + "1910680": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "1910753": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "191165647": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 452", + "Section 34", + "Section 3", + "Section 450" + ], + "1912511": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1912568": [ + "Section 164", + "Section 302", + "Section 161", + "Section 380", + "Section 313", + "Section 379", + "Section 201", + "Section 366" + ], + "1912742": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 494", + "Section 332", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 498", + "Section 324" + ], + "191286899": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 438" + ], + "191322954": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 304A" + ], + "1913270": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 324" + ], + "191329197": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 34" + ], + "19140906": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 307", + "Section 420", + "Section 436", + "Section 320", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 471" + ], + "1914224": [ + "Section 337", + "Section 427", + "Section 5", + "Section 13" + ], + "191429610": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 427", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 341" + ], + "191434943": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "191437500": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 304" + ], + "191444115": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 498A", + "Section 193", + "Section 354", + "Section 307" + ], + "191517257": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "191528928": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 392" + ], + "191546192": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "191552298": [ + "Section 279", + "Section 304A", + "Section 397", + "Section 417" + ], + "191555953": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 447", + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 511", + "Section 384" + ], + "191556002": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 448", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "191564261": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 511" + ], + "19156984": [ + "Section 107", + "Section 306", + "Section 34" + ], + "1915712": [ + "Section 415", + "Section 420", + "Section 419" + ], + "191613310": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "191650705": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "191655549": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 354", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "1915759": [ + "Section 228", + "Section 173" + ], + "1917001": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 467" + ], + "191715402": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 506" + ], + "191723773": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 482", + "Section 34", + "Section 320", + "Section 120B", + "Section 308", + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 506", + "Section 174A", + "Section 465", + "Section 420" + ], + "191724347": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 419", + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 397", + "Section 482" + ], + "191738935": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 427", + "Section 336", + "Section 332", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 353" + ], + "191846026": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 506" + ], + "191874374": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 304B", + "Section 302", + "Section 498", + "Section 34", + "Section 201" + ], + "191777391": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 332", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "191777997": [ + "Section 482", + "Section 506", + "Section 452", + "Section 427" + ], + "191782705": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 506" + ], + "191800690": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 294" + ], + "192201759": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A" + ], + "192210280": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 332", + "Section 34", + "Section 186" + ], + "192224658": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506" + ], + "192137253": [ + "Section 120", + "Section 420", + "Section 409", + "Section 406", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506" + ], + "1921459": [ + "Section 494", + "Section 498A", + "Section 468", + "Section 498" + ], + "192286393": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "192296955": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 354" + ], + "1923024": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1923095": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 323", + "Section 332", + "Section 420" + ], + "192317354": [ + "Section 389", + "Section 354" + ], + "191998101": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302" + ], + "192035002": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376" + ], + "19278412": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 364" + ], + "192841529": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 376" + ], + "192867225": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107", + "Section 313" + ], + "192903054": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 34", + "Section 107" + ], + "192432168": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "192439823": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1925596": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 375" + ], + "19259575": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 294" + ], + "192616949": [ + "Section 364", + "Section 392", + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "1927262": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 304", + "Section 323", + "Section 147" + ], + "1927741": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 109", + "Section 34" + ], + "192659869": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294" + ], + "192682771": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 509", + "Section 406", + "Section 341", + "Section 498A" + ], + "19284153": [ + "Section 3" + ], + "192852": [ + "Section 375", + "Section 302", + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 313" + ], + "192855953": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "192810862": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 341", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "192814905": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 294", + "Section 307" + ], + "193005832": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "1930072": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 465", + "Section 420", + "Section 409" + ], + "195149087": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "195164851": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 308", + "Section 34", + "Section 438", + "Section 498", + "Section 325" + ], + "195190519": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 307" + ], + "19302016": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 392", + "Section 34" + ], + "193033599": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 143" + ], + "19303985": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 326", + "Section 365", + "Section 304", + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 498", + "Section 323", + "Section 511", + "Section 302" + ], + "193058609": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 323", + "Section 395", + "Section 394", + "Section 148", + "Section 34", + "Section 294", + "Section 325", + "Section 452", + "Section 380", + "Section 324", + "Section 427" + ], + "193064612": [ + "Section 13" + ], + "193288154": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 34", + "Section 471", + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 506", + "Section 437", + "Section 468" + ], + "193299739": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "193262138": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 353" + ], + "193390736": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 342", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "193408138": [ + "Section 366" + ], + "1931219": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 107", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 228" + ], + "19313490": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 326" + ], + "193135057": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201" + ], + "193138305": [ + "Section 389" + ], + "193152": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 323" + ], + "193897810": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 304" + ], + "1938988": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 109", + "Section 120B" + ], + "193905668": [ + "Section 452" + ], + "193925132": [ + "Section 457", + "Section 380", + "Section 411", + "Section 114", + "Section 379" + ], + "193357257": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "193362639": [ + "Section 450", + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "193364401": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "1933730": [ + "Section 457", + "Section 376", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 417" + ], + "1935035": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 500" + ], + "193504901": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "193455532": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 324", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "193462459": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 468" + ], + "1934698": [ + "Section 307" + ], + "193475447": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "1935279": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 109", + "Section 307" + ], + "193555083": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "193558481": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 302", + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 304", + "Section 498" + ], + "193560042": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 380", + "Section 379", + "Section 34", + "Section 447", + "Section 427", + "Section 448", + "Section 506" + ], + "193563976": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 366", + "Section 375", + "Section 448", + "Section 341" + ], + "193565790": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 438", + "Section 376" + ], + "193571357": [ + "Section 324", + "Section 34" + ], + "193574733": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 364" + ], + "1935815": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 34", + "Section 148", + "Section 326", + "Section 300" + ], + "1935890": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 324", + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 364", + "Section 323", + "Section 308", + "Section 307", + "Section 304" + ], + "193676976": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 452", + "Section 504", + "Section 307" + ], + "194026": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 323" + ], + "194286856": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 326", + "Section 34" + ], + "194435071": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 120B" + ], + "1937359": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 114" + ], + "19374873": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "193773244": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "193781": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 324", + "Section 300", + "Section 304" + ], + "19378256": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 392", + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 148", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 307" + ], + "1937845": [ + "Section 120", + "Section 302" + ], + "193792759": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 109" + ], + "193812470": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 332", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 186", + "Section 147" + ], + "193821607": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 307", + "Section 504", + "Section 498A", + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 228" + ], + "193665925": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "193677092": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 323", + "Section 498A" + ], + "193679091": [ + "Section 336", + "Section 294", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "193697997": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 323", + "Section 307", + "Section 302" + ], + "193707061": [ + "Section 452" + ], + "193709066": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 498" + ], + "1940166": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "194021885": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 353" + ], + "194024704": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 341" + ], + "1940602": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "194066368": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 363", + "Section 34" + ], + "194087407": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 415", + "Section 406", + "Section 114", + "Section 120B" + ], + "1940450": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "1940492": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 304" + ], + "1940548": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 500", + "Section 294" + ], + "19409976": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 354", + "Section 448" + ], + "1941036": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 147", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "194114819": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 120" + ], + "194120": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 313", + "Section 120B", + "Section 326", + "Section 354", + "Section 164", + "Section 109", + "Section 201", + "Section 300", + "Section 465", + "Section 324", + "Section 366" + ], + "194136376": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 379" + ], + "194140723": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 506", + "Section 365", + "Section 366" + ], + "194152957": [ + "Section 365", + "Section 342", + "Section 437" + ], + "194157416": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 304", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 300", + "Section 299" + ], + "194261354": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 147" + ], + "194273382": [ + "Section 498A" + ], + "19430521": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 438" + ], + "194314494": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "1943865": [ + "Section 2", + "Section 504", + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 341" + ], + "194407563": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 375" + ], + "1944190": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 147", + "Section 307" + ], + "1944203": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302" + ], + "194421430": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 379", + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 427", + "Section 506" + ], + "1960244": [ + "Section 384", + "Section 392", + "Section 397", + "Section 394", + "Section 302" + ], + "196027465": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "19603308": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 394" + ], + "196045502": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 509", + "Section 506" + ], + "196247497": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 34", + "Section 323" + ], + "1962650": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 436", + "Section 409" + ], + "194745591": [ + "Section 465", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 409" + ], + "194753017": [ + "Section 337", + "Section 338", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 161", + "Section 120", + "Section 468", + "Section 4", + "Section 471" + ], + "19476094": [ + "Section 332", + "Section 294", + "Section 353" + ], + "194765913": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 161" + ], + "194766396": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 415" + ], + "194775091": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 313", + "Section 302", + "Section 306" + ], + "19496101": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 294", + "Section 427" + ], + "195018963": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 427", + "Section 342", + "Section 506", + "Section 448", + "Section 148", + "Section 143" + ], + "195050504": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 34" + ], + "19577900": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 417" + ], + "194997605": [ + "Section 300" + ], + "195057405": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 438" + ], + "19506784": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 392", + "Section 376" + ], + "195075172": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 147" + ], + "195082": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1950908": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 427" + ], + "195427231": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 193", + "Section 13", + "Section 228" + ], + "195443134": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A" + ], + "195455482": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 341", + "Section 147" + ], + "195457280": [ + "Section 438", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "195460": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 5" + ], + "1954622": [ + "Section 5" + ], + "195336443": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 482", + "Section 228", + "Section 304" + ], + "1953407": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 306" + ], + "195348497": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 325", + "Section 447", + "Section 323", + "Section 326", + "Section 304", + "Section 307" + ], + "195349522": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 415" + ], + "195357365": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 380" + ], + "195362350": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 427", + "Section 332", + "Section 109", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 143", + "Section 147", + "Section 395", + "Section 420", + "Section 353" + ], + "195375950": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 300", + "Section 304", + "Section 326", + "Section 324" + ], + "195386156": [ + "Section 389", + "Section 304A", + "Section 338", + "Section 337", + "Section 279" + ], + "195566820": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 304", + "Section 148", + "Section 34", + "Section 364", + "Section 366", + "Section 384" + ], + "195573854": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "195575932": [ + "Section 3", + "Section 363", + "Section 376", + "Section 366" + ], + "1956023": [ + "Section 379" + ], + "195617239": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 419", + "Section 120" + ], + "195633389": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 302" + ], + "1956474": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 34" + ], + "195653073": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1956638": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 2", + "Section 5", + "Section 337", + "Section 114", + "Section 4", + "Section 120B", + "Section 308", + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 354", + "Section 504" + ], + "1956673": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 482", + "Section 415", + "Section 155", + "Section 156", + "Section 417", + "Section 406", + "Section 114" + ], + "1957933": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467", + "Section 511", + "Section 417", + "Section 109", + "Section 420" + ], + "195793834": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A" + ], + "195960495": [ + "Section 228" + ], + "195975721": [ + "Section 173" + ], + "195978920": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 341", + "Section 506" + ], + "195991591": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 342", + "Section 307", + "Section 325" + ], + "195997038": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 325", + "Section 307" + ], + "196060397": [ + "Section 337", + "Section 338", + "Section 308", + "Section 380", + "Section 457", + "Section 307" + ], + "1960704": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 107" + ], + "196154031": [ + "Section 229A", + "Section 174A" + ], + "1961558": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 313", + "Section 411", + "Section 320" + ], + "196157306": [ + "Section 384", + "Section 34", + "Section 411" + ], + "196161917": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "196165423": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 326", + "Section 341", + "Section 506", + "Section 438" + ], + "196179597": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 427", + "Section 506", + "Section 336", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 341", + "Section 302", + "Section 392" + ], + "196182002": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 307", + "Section 438", + "Section 448", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "1961941": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 120", + "Section 409", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 467" + ], + "196221716": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 294" + ], + "196312171": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 379", + "Section 294" + ], + "196324044": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 201", + "Section 341", + "Section 324", + "Section 294(b)" + ], + "196275778": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 406" + ], + "196304737": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 376" + ], + "196354361": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 354" + ], + "196359412": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 302", + "Section 427", + "Section 332", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 148", + "Section 353", + "Section 147", + "Section 201", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "1963679": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 304", + "Section 307" + ], + "196435016": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 504", + "Section 304" + ], + "1964540": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 326" + ], + "196464080": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 306", + "Section 438" + ], + "196595164": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 341" + ], + "196601900": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 354", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 509" + ], + "196891456": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 419", + "Section 376", + "Section 164", + "Section 438" + ], + "1969111": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 354", + "Section 509", + "Section 5" + ], + "196916602": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A" + ], + "196916613": [ + "Section 494", + "Section 34" + ], + "196615729": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 509" + ], + "196618358": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 304" + ], + "196659161": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 308", + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 304B" + ], + "196793977": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107" + ], + "1967521": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 324", + "Section 149", + "Section 143", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 452", + "Section 323", + "Section 394", + "Section 395" + ], + "196766081": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 437", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "196768782": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 307", + "Section 149" + ], + "196778499": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 468", + "Section 465", + "Section 471", + "Section 467", + "Section 419", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 438" + ], + "196817100": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 120" + ], + "1968197": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 337", + "Section 120B", + "Section 279", + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 482" + ], + "196834281": [ + "Section 494" + ], + "196836963": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 452" + ], + "1968392": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 509", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "196690081": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 34" + ], + "196749319": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 302" + ], + "1967900": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A", + "Section 498" + ], + "1970868": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "196998829": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "197000667": [ + "Section 500", + "Section 120B" + ], + "1969859": [ + "Section 452" + ], + "1969872": [ + "Section 304A" + ], + "1969901": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 313", + "Section 307", + "Section 107", + "Section 379", + "Section 302", + "Section 411" + ], + "197061143": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 13", + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467" + ], + "197075505": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 392" + ], + "197076591": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 376" + ], + "197028388": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 34", + "Section 364" + ], + "197041929": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 482" + ], + "197048045": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 376" + ], + "197048408": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 325", + "Section 380", + "Section 34", + "Section 504", + "Section 448", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "197099426": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 325" + ], + "197117635": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "197290333": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "1973045": [ + "Section 332", + "Section 147" + ], + "197312079": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 229A", + "Section 406", + "Section 174A", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 467" + ], + "197312272": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1973535": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 323", + "Section 447", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 326" + ], + "197367459": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 107", + "Section 406" + ], + "19736954": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 306", + "Section 498A", + "Section 34" + ], + "197374768": [ + "Section 365", + "Section 34" + ], + "197389543": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "19747075": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 506", + "Section 336", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 341", + "Section 392", + "Section 397" + ], + "197486720": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 341", + "Section 326" + ], + "1975027": [ + "Section 120B" + ], + "197515676": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A" + ], + "1975279": [ + "Section 452" + ], + "197912525": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 323", + "Section 107", + "Section 149" + ], + "197913051": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 5", + "Section 376", + "Section 3", + "Section 506" + ], + "197837721": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 143", + "Section 506", + "Section 147", + "Section 148" + ], + "197839441": [ + "Section 336", + "Section 279", + "Section 34" + ], + "1978562": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "197862632": [ + "Section 304A", + "Section 279", + "Section 337" + ], + "197863295": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 308", + "Section 341" + ], + "197868035": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 120B", + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "197873211": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 325", + "Section 341" + ], + "197882012": [ + "Section 509", + "Section 109", + "Section 342", + "Section 354", + "Section 376" + ], + "198032944": [ + "Section 173" + ], + "1980424": [ + "Section 109", + "Section 120B" + ], + "198074244": [ + "Section 384", + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "198075406": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 509", + "Section 506" + ], + "199217018": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 452", + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 504" + ], + "199229119": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 384" + ], + "197583968": [ + "Section 324" + ], + "1976126": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "197635274": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 420", + "Section 419", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 409" + ], + "197643": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 379", + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "19775107": [ + "Section 389" + ], + "1977612": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 120B", + "Section 161", + "Section 120" + ], + "197762349": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 155", + "Section 420", + "Section 419", + "Section 482", + "Section 156" + ], + "197712983": [ + "Section 147", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 392" + ], + "197713597": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 307", + "Section 438", + "Section 323", + "Section 326" + ], + "1977188": [ + "Section 482" + ], + "1977998": [ + "Section 452", + "Section 325", + "Section 506", + "Section 376" + ], + "197828168": [ + "Section 193" + ], + "197832756": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 332", + "Section 34", + "Section 186" + ], + "197926362": [ + "Section 467", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 468" + ], + "19798865": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B" + ], + "198081262": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 307" + ], + "198106": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "1982738": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 326" + ], + "198299957": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "198300158": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 294" + ], + "1983095": [ + "Section 164" + ], + "198323408": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 302" + ], + "198324753": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 394", + "Section 504", + "Section 392", + "Section 384", + "Section 34" + ], + "198347613": [ + "Section 173", + "Section 392", + "Section 411" + ], + "1983582": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 324" + ], + "198418172": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 353", + "Section 411", + "Section 188", + "Section 34" + ], + "198429380": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 452", + "Section 447", + "Section 448", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "198431813": [ + "Section 417", + "Section 34", + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 341" + ], + "198434348": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 307", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 323" + ], + "19837294": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 313" + ], + "198411326": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 323", + "Section 376", + "Section 366" + ], + "198442181": [ + "Section 448", + "Section 376(2)" + ], + "198499192": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 341", + "Section 308", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "1985662": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 114" + ], + "198829432": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302" + ], + "19893398": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 3", + "Section 498", + "Section 342", + "Section 34" + ], + "198449978": [ + "Section 389" + ], + "198466025": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 294" + ], + "198468807": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "198476191": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 436", + "Section 353", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 379", + "Section 326", + "Section 325", + "Section 307", + "Section 332", + "Section 427", + "Section 323", + "Section 149", + "Section 120B" + ], + "198481163": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 147", + "Section 307", + "Section 148", + "Section 326", + "Section 149", + "Section 186" + ], + "198494690": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 325", + "Section 148" + ], + "19855331": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 406" + ], + "198572304": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A" + ], + "198578675": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 332", + "Section 336", + "Section 307", + "Section 353", + "Section 341", + "Section 147", + "Section 506", + "Section 148" + ], + "198727771": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 427", + "Section 395", + "Section 506", + "Section 148", + "Section 406", + "Section 447", + "Section 452", + "Section 147", + "Section 323" + ], + "198737792": [ + "Section 498", + "Section 438" + ], + "1987501": [ + "Section 107", + "Section 193", + "Section 366", + "Section 302" + ], + "198765404": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 365", + "Section 120", + "Section 164", + "Section 376" + ], + "198795506": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 411", + "Section 392", + "Section 34" + ], + "198845065": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 392", + "Section 294" + ], + "1988665": [ + "Section 186", + "Section 353" + ], + "198878458": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306" + ], + "199027647": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 307" + ], + "199041180": [ + "Section 313", + "Section 498A", + "Section 406" + ], + "199042518": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 302", + "Section 511" + ], + "1986486": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 34" + ], + "1989842": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B" + ], + "199102120": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 363", + "Section 342" + ], + "199114204": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 324" + ], + "199119789": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 506", + "Section 448", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 324", + "Section 380" + ], + "199130163": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 34", + "Section 504" + ], + "19913655": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 376", + "Section 506", + "Section 34" + ], + "199138620": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 324", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 147", + "Section 427", + "Section 323", + "Section 341", + "Section 448" + ], + "19914755": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 506", + "Section 302", + "Section 364", + "Section 120", + "Section 307", + "Section 363", + "Section 229A", + "Section 201" + ], + "1991874": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 379", + "Section 143", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 161", + "Section 307", + "Section 173" + ], + "199204343": [ + "Section 304" + ], + "1992086": [ + "Section 2", + "Section 34", + "Section 397", + "Section 394", + "Section 392" + ], + "1999136": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 323", + "Section 304" + ], + "199913736": [ + "Section 156", + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 409", + "Section 406", + "Section 190" + ], + "1999217": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 299" + ], + "199248723": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 392" + ], + "1992527": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 506" + ], + "199263539": [ + "Section 5", + "Section 506" + ], + "1992698": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 323", + "Section 147", + "Section 427", + "Section 304A", + "Section 299" + ], + "19927836": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 498A", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "199292408": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 302", + "Section 394", + "Section 34" + ], + "199301051": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 34", + "Section 304B" + ], + "1993098": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 376" + ], + "19945929": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 376" + ], + "199410887": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376" + ], + "199411668": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 324", + "Section 299", + "Section 506", + "Section 307", + "Section 452" + ], + "199476996": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 120B", + "Section 406", + "Section 409" + ], + "199483343": [ + "Section 389" + ], + "199499045": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294", + "Section 341", + "Section 34", + "Section 452" + ], + "199501368": [ + "Section 300", + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "1995018": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366", + "Section 506", + "Section 504" + ], + "1995089": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 307", + "Section 323", + "Section 302" + ], + "199510857": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 427", + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 34" + ], + "199519347": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 409", + "Section 468", + "Section 465" + ], + "199532099": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 447", + "Section 341" + ], + "1995799": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 467", + "Section 409", + "Section 420", + "Section 406" + ], + "199582897": [ + "Section 279", + "Section 337" + ], + "1996071": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304" + ], + "199406408": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 498A", + "Section 482", + "Section 436" + ], + "199475434": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 376" + ], + "199698892": [ + "Section 417", + "Section 415", + "Section 376" + ], + "199706262": [ + "Section 457", + "Section 354" + ], + "1997211": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307" + ], + "199724638": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 302", + "Section 120B", + "Section 34" + ], + "199732842": [ + "Section 325", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 438", + "Section 498", + "Section 34" + ], + "199741245": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294" + ], + "199742966": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 304B", + "Section 306", + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 504" + ], + "19976059": [ + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 147" + ], + "199875869": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34" + ], + "199878185": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 504", + "Section 392", + "Section 406", + "Section 302", + "Section 34", + "Section 323" + ], + "199879313": [ + "Section 326", + "Section 506", + "Section 504", + "Section 323", + "Section 324" + ], + "199897935": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A" + ], + "20007031": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 394", + "Section 341", + "Section 392" + ], + "200296": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 304" + ], + "20037863": [ + "Section 366", + "Section 365", + "Section 376" + ], + "20043358": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 302" + ], + "200532": [ + "Section 427", + "Section 148", + "Section 147" + ], + "34583040": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "3459411": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 354" + ], + "34612629": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 120B", + "Section 465", + "Section 471", + "Section 193" + ], + "34624007": [ + "Section 353", + "Section 307", + "Section 332", + "Section 148", + "Section 427", + "Section 149" + ], + "34667542": [ + "Section 354" + ], + "34722127": [ + "Section 394", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "34723655": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 354", + "Section 509", + "Section 341" + ], + "347271": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 147", + "Section 332", + "Section 504", + "Section 353", + "Section 323", + "Section 506" + ], + "347737": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 300", + "Section 107" + ], + "34773909": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 147", + "Section 148" + ], + "621587": [ + "Section 465", + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 420", + "Section 467", + "Section 190", + "Section 482", + "Section 161" + ], + "62162336": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 406", + "Section 482", + "Section 34", + "Section 304B", + "Section 228" + ], + "62179995": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 300", + "Section 299", + "Section 375" + ], + "49074460": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 498A", + "Section 313", + "Section 34" + ], + "49087464": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 34", + "Section 323", + "Section 437", + "Section 506" + ], + "490893": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 109", + "Section 341" + ], + "1014870": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "101488287": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 406", + "Section 392", + "Section 379", + "Section 468", + "Section 471" + ], + "101490": [ + "Section 397", + "Section 394", + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 323", + "Section 325", + "Section 392", + "Section 326", + "Section 395" + ], + "101491779": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 120B", + "Section 409", + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 471", + "Section 465" + ], + "91554570": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 34", + "Section 302" + ], + "91574732": [ + "Section 411", + "Section 438" + ], + "9158298": [ + "Section 376" + ], + "91858704": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 471", + "Section 465", + "Section 468", + "Section 200" + ], + "918619": [ + "Section 173", + "Section 190", + "Section 2" + ], + "91869951": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 341" + ], + "91873050": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A" + ], + "919821": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 313", + "Section 320", + "Section 364" + ], + "127354135": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107" + ], + "127372710": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 438" + ], + "127378907": [ + "Section 465", + "Section 471", + "Section 468" + ], + "127379086": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 506", + "Section 427", + "Section 341", + "Section 34" + ], + "1273819": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 341", + "Section 336", + "Section 506", + "Section 427" + ], + "47495129": [ + "Section 504", + "Section 324", + "Section 506", + "Section 323" + ], + "47501971": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 409", + "Section 406", + "Section 506" + ], + "475211": [ + "Section 173", + "Section 397", + "Section 302", + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 324", + "Section 437", + "Section 427", + "Section 120B", + "Section 395", + "Section 149", + "Section 337", + "Section 147", + "Section 201", + "Section 143", + "Section 148" + ], + "47526871": [ + "Section 306", + "Section 107" + ], + "98869757": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294(b)", + "Section 147" + ], + "9888179": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 471", + "Section 109" + ], + "988951": [ + "Section 190", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 332" + ], + "98902417": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 511", + "Section 354" + ], + "98910786": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 406", + "Section 120B", + "Section 415" + ], + "98922734": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 409", + "Section 120B", + "Section 173", + "Section 156", + "Section 155", + "Section 482", + "Section 120" + ], + "98957662": [ + "Section 304", + "Section 302" + ], + "989715": [ + "Section 306" + ], + "98974289": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 376", + "Section 34" + ], + "98985452": [ + "Section 471", + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 419", + "Section 468", + "Section 409", + "Section 13", + "Section 467" + ], + "989893": [ + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 376", + "Section 34", + "Section 375", + "Section 342" + ], + "81328386": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 366A", + "Section 354", + "Section 438", + "Section 506", + "Section 511" + ], + "813292": [ + "Section 392", + "Section 397", + "Section 506" + ], + "81335223": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 420", + "Section 34" + ], + "81338630": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 384", + "Section 323", + "Section 332", + "Section 353", + "Section 186", + "Section 341" + ], + "813477": [ + "Section 323", + "Section 304", + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 299", + "Section 228" + ], + "813595": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 324" + ], + "813699": [ + "Section 498A", + "Section 306", + "Section 304B" + ], + "43461074": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 294" + ], + "434622": [ + "Section 120B", + "Section 409" + ], + "434654": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 468", + "Section 120B", + "Section 467" + ], + "434675": [ + "Section 190", + "Section 420", + "Section 482", + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 468", + "Section 156" + ], + "43476931": [ + "Section 506", + "Section 323", + "Section 504", + "Section 376", + "Section 229A" + ], + "43487": [ + "Section 307", + "Section 164", + "Section 5", + "Section 34", + "Section 107", + "Section 302" + ], + "43488329": [ + "Section 174A", + "Section 229A" + ], + "434894": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 406" + ], + "43551447": [ + "Section 494" + ], + "43558830": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 300", + "Section 304", + "Section 148", + "Section 506", + "Section 147", + "Section 34", + "Section 324", + "Section 325" + ], + "435599": [ + "Section 201" + ], + "435826": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 313", + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A" + ], + "43590549": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 143" + ], + "435907": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 147", + "Section 148", + "Section 452", + "Section 323", + "Section 324", + "Section 341", + "Section 308" + ], + "73138044": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 324", + "Section 448", + "Section 506", + "Section 34", + "Section 325", + "Section 326" + ], + "731486": [ + "Section 395", + "Section 448", + "Section 200", + "Section 482", + "Section 397", + "Section 452", + "Section 380" + ], + "50777651": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 34", + "Section 498A", + "Section 13" + ], + "5078981": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A" + ], + "508954": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 364" + ], + "70477804": [ + "Section 341", + "Section 307", + "Section 304", + "Section 448", + "Section 323", + "Section 34", + "Section 326" + ], + "70483626": [ + "Section 201", + "Section 120B", + "Section 363", + "Section 366" + ], + "704993": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 34", + "Section 300", + "Section 164", + "Section 148" + ], + "70415914": [ + "Section 379", + "Section 143", + "Section 325", + "Section 448", + "Section 323", + "Section 326" + ], + "70438238": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 302", + "Section 148", + "Section 326", + "Section 147", + "Section 447" + ], + "70440": [ + "Section 149", + "Section 304", + "Section 148", + "Section 302" + ], + "70442436": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 307", + "Section 34", + "Section 294" + ], + "704532": [ + "Section 161", + "Section 120B", + "Section 313" + ], + "1258151": [ + "Section 468", + "Section 120B", + "Section 420", + "Section 467" + ], + "125823274": [ + "Section 302" + ], + "125852486": [ + "Section 363", + "Section 376(2)", + "Section 376", + "Section 366" + ], + "125854": [ + "Section 302", + "Section 304", + "Section 300" + ], + "1257548": [ + "Section 34", + "Section 302", + "Section 149", + "Section 148", + "Section 114" + ], + "125761299": [ + "Section 188", + "Section 143" + ], + "1257614": [ + "Section 494", + "Section 120B", + "Section 109" + ], + "125773753": [ + "Section 376", + "Section 506" + ], + "125787651": [ + "Section 338", + "Section 304A", + "Section 279" + ], + "1257907": [ + "Section 409", + "Section 120B", + "Section 406", + "Section 109" + ], + "125792178": [ + "Section 304B", + "Section 498A", + "Section 302", + "Section 201", + "Section 34" + ], + "125795346": [ + "Section 294", + "Section 506", + "Section 308" + ], + "125867177": [ + "Section 420", + "Section 417", + "Section 120B", + "Section 468", + "Section 467", + "Section 471", + "Section 465" + ], + "125892713": [ + "Section 354", + "Section 342" + ], + "125892736": [ + "Section 406", + "Section 498A", + "Section 419", + "Section 420" + ] + }, + "pcr": { + "0000021652": [ + "0000590455", + "0000916840", + "0001481813", + "0001907199" + ], + "0000030721": [ + "0000004354", + "0000320809", + "0000516439", + "0000611866", + "0000685234", + "0000785119", + "0000849101", + "0001061804", + "0001195357", + "0001248365", + "0001363234", + "0001489649", + "0001531491", + "0001766147", + "0001849054", + "0001880952" + ], + "0000037174": [ + "0000004354", + "0000193762", + "0000351838", + "0000456839", + "0000496236", + "0000512761", + "0000528732", + "0000640725", + "0000665682", + "0000698472", + "0000907725", + "0001057797", + "0001126318", + "0001149874", + "0001378263", + "0001386353", + "0001394213", + "0001506108", + "0001716282", + "0001733535", + "0001750663", + "0001757393", + "0001809331", + "0001813801", + "0001968012" + ], + "0000038597": [ + "0000101697", + "0000327169", + "0000485116", + "0000968709", + "0001353689" + ], + "0000043994": [ + "0000887364", + "0157433067" + ], + "0000047629": [ + "0000639803", + "0001382485", + "0001455346", + "0001857950" + ], + "0000055098": [ + "0000001566", + "0000041868", + "0000315432", + "0000660275", + "0000681436", + "0000973363", + "0001018531", + "0001240174", + "0001298680", + "0001657891", + "0001758160", + "0001880952", + "0001882267", + "0001963913", + "0060443377" + ], + "0000056195": [ + "0000028825", + "0000390792", + "0000675238", + "0000821763", + "0000886875", + "0000892009", + "0000925336", + "0001073688", + "0001480735", + "0001813941" + ], + "0000059678": [ + "0000137039" + ], + "0000070466": [ + "0000361106", + "0000442524", + "0000863497", + "0000997610", + "0001014408", + "0001120137", + "0001740954", + "0001831036", + "0001986616" + ], + "0000078536": [ + "0000162242", + "0000353351", + "0000778810", + "0000850821", + "0000879068", + "0001007347", + "0001573666", + "0001766147", + "0133550130" + ], + "0000081055": [ + "0000310501", + "0000748727", + "0001149818", + "0001329246", + "0001359356", + "0001436024" + ], + "0000102852": [ + "0000113526", + "0000151907", + "0000243002", + "0000257876", + "0000599701", + "0000861069", + "0000936707", + "0000994451", + "0001111529", + "0001186368", + "0001361237", + "0001363234", + "0001466728", + "0001686885", + "0001766147", + "0001857950", + "0001871744", + "0001939993" + ], + "0000107104": [ + "0001871332" + ], + "0000107780": [ + "0000144508", + "0000253561", + "0000363381", + "0000913572", + "0000923733", + "0000971550", + "0001053542", + "0001063842", + "0001126745", + "0001378773", + "0001418391", + "0001997627" + ], + "0000108534": [ + "0000035468", + "0000158516", + "0000201545", + "0000327334", + "0000504870", + "0000565089", + "0001114727", + "0001575754", + "0001691127", + "0020740455" + ], + "0000123740": [ + "0000967465" + ], + "0000134532": [ + "0000022699", + "0001013352", + "0001285565", + "0001537954" + ], + "0000151302": [ + "0000525017", + "0000899911", + "0000931195", + "0001553220", + "0001815803", + "0001840796" + ], + "0000169599": [ + "0001274508" + ], + "0000172640": [ + "0000000987", + "0000053020", + "0001464458", + "0001720898" + ], + "0000177474": [ + "0000488714", + "0000490098", + "0000803844", + "0000856827", + "0000943770", + "0001027050", + "0001261186", + "0001282496", + "0001377272", + "0001560985" + ], + "0000180317": [ + "0000414242", + "0000682293", + "0001300403", + "0001754138", + "0001771458" + ], + "0000184190": [ + "0000584125" + ], + "0000190651": [ + "0000034509", + "0000300099", + "0001323656" + ], + "0000195129": [ + "0000010459", + "0000114447", + "0000210785", + "0000278608", + "0000324164", + "0000490735", + "0000608874", + "0000935053", + "0000951533", + "0001221030", + "0001744698", + "0001747962", + "0001855680" + ], + "0000199139": [ + "0000348559", + "0000679996", + "0001733648" + ], + "0000199143": [ + "0001871744" + ], + "0000235803": [ + "0000075422", + "0000096040", + "0000625579", + "0000759521", + "0000774518", + "0001105204", + "0001124411", + "0001295207", + "0001927285" + ], + "0000241245": [ + "0000396208" + ], + "0000256394": [ + "0000774626" + ], + "0000270817": [ + "0000325317", + "0000423161", + "0000424047", + "0000577658", + "0001173428", + "0001338641", + "0001502516", + "0001546983", + "0001848445", + "0001854454", + "0001916574" + ], + "0000282592": [ + "0000406974", + "0000615469" + ], + "0000287864": [ + "0001356963", + "0001758535" + ], + "0000290613": [ + "0000357142", + "0000547717", + "0000571954", + "0000665168", + "0000903306", + "0001032892", + "0001270021", + "0001272035", + "0001876937" + ], + "0000293661": [ + "0000014789", + "0000362389", + "0000379593", + "0000631746", + "0000645052", + "0000908527", + "0000975807", + "0001064060", + "0001997407" + ], + "0000327202": [ + "0001074072", + "0001143491", + "0001338992", + "0001484009" + ], + "0000327334": [ + "0000035468", + "0000201545", + "0000565089", + "0000889424", + "0001114727", + "0001635125", + "0001681974", + "0001689123", + "0001693503" + ], + "0000328250": [ + "0000012637", + "0000263647", + "0000636011", + "0000676779", + "0000756197", + "0000777166", + "0001085477", + "0001101230", + "0001114923", + "0001207302", + "0001429395", + "0001433939", + "0001461059" + ], + "0000328628": [ + "0001831380" + ], + "0000329840": [ + "0000403856", + "0000563376", + "0001208422", + "0001310375", + "0005206851", + "0150417452", + "0154112735" + ], + "0000342651": [ + "0000380642", + "0005565313" + ], + "0000345078": [ + "0000086256", + "0000380958", + "0001104260", + "0001300646", + "0001567881" + ], + "0000353077": [ + "0001250363", + "0001313981", + "0001841230" + ], + "0000355919": [ + "0000049480", + "0000052016", + "0000863497" + ], + "0000363381": [ + "0000526906", + "0000639803", + "0000879806", + "0000892303", + "0001027849", + "0001372570", + "0001675739" + ], + "0000368132": [ + "0000095274", + "0000705032", + "0001009121", + "0001273982", + "0001739214" + ], + "0000402967": [ + "0000616577", + "0001309362", + "0001323341", + "0001350547", + "0001632366", + "0001849088", + "0132535791" + ], + "0000419395": [ + "0000218763", + "0000266240" + ], + "0000431954": [ + "" + ], + "0000432259": [ + "0001434001" + ], + "0000462163": [ + "0000186428", + "0000320843", + "0000447441", + "0000497388", + "0000974148", + "0001281050", + "0047808634" + ], + "0000469863": [ + "0000056603", + "0000777513", + "0000857581", + "0000973037", + "0001297969", + "0001365275", + "0001596363", + "0001822801" + ], + "0000504870": [ + "0000565089", + "0000884131" + ], + "0000507731": [ + "0000313314", + "0000427114", + "0001660852", + "0001867627", + "0001991233" + ], + "0000511635": [ + "0000056823", + "0000418835", + "0001033637", + "0001684706", + "0001751199", + "0001922701" + ], + "0000514162": [ + "0000212098", + "0000233559", + "0000283660", + "0000424874", + "0000928482", + "0000959860", + "0001148508", + "0001291316", + "0001629177", + "0001857950" + ], + "0000516738": [ + "0000047629", + "0000169599", + "0000729271", + "0001207635", + "0001232760", + "0001239949", + "0001427520", + "0001749406", + "0001860806", + "0001908803" + ], + "0000522452": [ + "0000850597" + ], + "0000527368": [ + "0172560102" + ], + "0000527480": [ + "0000081544", + "0000688536", + "0001381780", + "0035018544" + ], + "0000535796": [ + "0000198357", + "0000991170", + "0001285886", + "0001428689" + ], + "0000537129": [ + "0000529384", + "0000634752", + "0001291269", + "0001300681" + ], + "0000540215": [ + "0000251519", + "0001585501" + ], + "0000594165": [ + "0001642416" + ], + "0000603628": [ + "0000051942", + "0000175151", + "0000181784", + "0000804932", + "0000890199", + "0001324656" + ], + "0000615273": [ + "0000170133", + "0000319187", + "0000525364", + "0000721631", + "0000839441", + "0001027455", + "0001065676", + "0001146476", + "0001195692", + "0001401948", + "0001512520", + "0001886356", + "0118959948" + ], + "0000615459": [ + "0000103561", + "0000180266", + "0000267499", + "0000288048", + "0000330608", + "0000368264", + "0000417765", + "0000486152", + "0000487303", + "0000529384", + "0000863497", + "0000880032", + "0000990811", + "0001300681", + "0001389940", + "0001455698", + "0001566484", + "0001632587", + "0001676726", + "0001752560", + "0001883538", + "0001938862", + "0002044127" + ], + "0000648722": [ + "0000127231", + "0000204623", + "0000963833", + "0001512520" + ], + "0000649393": [ + "0000480602", + "0000551443" + ], + "0000660982": [ + "0000351763", + "0001423213", + "0001860307" + ], + "0000667950": [ + "0000040914", + "0000535796", + "0000802260" + ], + "0000682224": [ + "0000097946", + "0000827604", + "0001186368", + "0001220466", + "0001255418", + "0001281050", + "0001327287", + "0001329246", + "0001416283", + "0001646640", + "0001748256", + "0001766147", + "0001901448", + "0001963880", + "0157352718" + ], + "0000699829": [ + "0000142305", + "0000476231", + "0001090299", + "0001846280" + ], + "0000742753": [ + "0000130257", + "0000378998", + "0000476389", + "0000588869", + "0000615273", + "0000803844", + "0001017570", + "0001534038", + "0001638090" + ], + "0000764981": [ + "0000135147", + "0000368132", + "0000394116", + "0000405121", + "0000458151", + "0000473715", + "0000610134", + "0000798354", + "0000992616", + "0001385337", + "0001455092", + "0001540821", + "0001638886", + "0001854419" + ], + "0000785041": [ + "0000061710", + "0000501198", + "0000810491", + "0000838507", + "0001102670", + "0001486969", + "0001600010", + "0001628260", + "0001877695", + "0069408974" + ], + "0000804932": [ + "0000249589", + "0001091542", + "0001678889", + "0001822234" + ], + "0000859960": [ + "0000045190", + "0000251519", + "0000506701", + "0000506712", + "0000541371", + "0000693296", + "0000736384", + "0000755015", + "0000817233", + "0000947881", + "0001281733", + "0001441202", + "0001508646", + "0001543835", + "0001589786", + "0001725452", + "0001731463", + "0001767518", + "0001814137", + "0001860221", + "0001937010", + "0001991214", + "0066528263" + ], + "0000863497": [ + "0000051914", + "0000255020", + "0000321104", + "0000361106", + "0000368738", + "0000491315", + "0000628501", + "0000703197", + "0000743342", + "0001041496", + "0001053944", + "0001161831", + "0001252118", + "0001358640", + "0001411268", + "0001458789", + "0001536230", + "0001986616", + "0001996908" + ], + "0000868851": [ + "0001020411", + "0001129356", + "0001916066" + ], + "0000870563": [ + "0000027215", + "0000092456", + "0000436913", + "0000774655", + "0001117717", + "0001123085", + "0001433474", + "0001548346", + "0001788955", + "0114464453" + ], + "0000871220": [ + "0000113707", + "0000146451", + "0000163455", + "0000336923", + "0000467021", + "0000521874", + "0000561287", + "0000630568", + "0000746327", + "0001002467", + "0001298680", + "0001880129", + "0001882267", + "0001913517" + ], + "0000877318": [ + "0000059777", + "0000072520", + "0000165215", + "0000179243", + "0000728993", + "0000891538", + "0000912714", + "0001143451", + "0001178884", + "0001512454", + "0001548702", + "0001664377", + "0001752424", + "0001993897", + "0062722291" + ], + "0000882004": [ + "0000162877", + "0000370259", + "0000804139", + "0000944064", + "0001129034" + ], + "0000884513": [ + "0000061838", + "0000080596", + "0000143379", + "0000298443", + "0000299215", + "0000300655", + "0000465789", + "0000514007", + "0000616070", + "0000634160", + "0000639803", + "0000743328", + "0000830683", + "0000958552", + "0001238017", + "0001252118", + "0001572927", + "0001619801", + "0001747748", + "0001788187", + "0001794709", + "0001808782", + "0001929601", + "0001964881", + "0027098883" + ], + "0000889031": [ + "0001982235" + ], + "0000891449": [ + "0001391503" + ], + "0000892303": [ + "0001888479" + ], + "0000923000": [ + "0001719430" + ], + "0000949611": [ + "0000081055", + "0000380817" + ], + "0000951761": [ + "0000002886", + "0000353077", + "0000877318", + "0000917632", + "0001240125", + "0001511395", + "0001633734", + "0001665633", + "0001667142", + "0001890858", + "0001930234" + ], + "0000957056": [ + "0000770422" + ], + "0000967474": [ + "0000544869", + "0001484981" + ], + "0000971033": [ + "0000530481", + "0000668391", + "0000804763", + "0000856827", + "0001162775", + "0001436056", + "0001819721", + "0001901075" + ], + "0000971059": [ + "0001737795" + ], + "0000985625": [ + "0000913336", + "0001296326", + "0001707617" + ], + "0000995696": [ + "0001969450", + "0001987729" + ], + "0001002007": [ + "0000004354", + "0000033396", + "0000037963", + "0000165105", + "0000202223", + "0000246911", + "0000308632", + "0000354241", + "0000469498", + "0000610740", + "0000639803", + "0000640323", + "0000689891", + "0000705558", + "0000763510", + "0000768110", + "0000817954", + "0000859161", + "0000876346", + "0001003330", + "0001119469", + "0001128835", + "0001273595", + "0001296240", + "0001330367", + "0001481537", + "0001515136", + "0001564044", + "0001704181", + "0001764789", + "0001766147", + "0001798267", + "0001831036", + "0001880952", + "0001929828", + "0001963266", + "0001992267", + "0018928039", + "0035662889", + "0064823282", + "0160705552" + ], + "0001010255": [ + "0000588099", + "0001341010", + "0001483262" + ], + "0001029775": [ + "0000040914" + ], + "0001036851": [ + "0000335364" + ], + "0001037935": [ + "0000087528", + "0000312114", + "0001201493" + ], + "0001046518": [ + "0001353604" + ], + "0001064244": [ + "0000450722", + "0000837072", + "0001070490", + "0004517240" + ], + "0001067634": [ + "0000095533", + "0000174208", + "0000396290", + "0000468220", + "0000499202", + "0000623299", + "0000959413", + "0001061510", + "0001069183", + "0001098115", + "0001126538", + "0001222587", + "0001806633", + "0001832798", + "0038825714", + "0048097532" + ], + "0001071582": [ + "0000239791", + "0000660982", + "0001353567", + "0001396941", + "0001739201", + "0001819006", + "0001871184" + ], + "0001085477": [ + "0000500094", + "0000564491", + "0001205917", + "0001207302" + ], + "0001090657": [ + "0000138167", + "0000970561", + "0001055970", + "0001251810", + "0001823043", + "0001827447", + "0001882646", + "0001961189" + ], + "0001104022": [ + "0000594383", + "0000888361", + "0000923991", + "0001671648", + "0001805387", + "0001990557" + ], + "0001114923": [ + "0000159485", + "0000263647", + "0000661111", + "0000791231", + "0001315236" + ], + "0001118045": [ + "0000026737", + "0000210798", + "0000378398", + "0000529360", + "0000649226", + "0000692347", + "0000814692", + "0000909738", + "0000935914", + "0001646305", + "0027391014" + ], + "0001120005": [ + "0001515519" + ], + "0001129467": [ + "0000675008", + "0001865791", + "0001974738" + ], + "0001141174": [ + "0000013482", + "0000013774", + "0000026873", + "0000033580", + "0000037919", + "0000093828", + "0000219931", + "0000307651", + "0000499423", + "0000507731", + "0000571645", + "0000574510", + "0000662212", + "0000732151", + "0000763236", + "0000804199", + "0000947592", + "0001031875", + "0001271427", + "0001305957", + "0001354953", + "0001374934", + "0001463760", + "0001637163", + "0001867627", + "0001890502", + "0001923688", + "0001932169", + "0198954261" + ], + "0001150387": [ + "0000588099" + ], + "0001166174": [ + "0000424874", + "0001218527", + "0001222961" + ], + "0001166898": [ + "0000071061", + "0000144022", + "0000146082", + "0000340907", + "0000412295", + "0000602698", + "0000931634", + "0000956415", + "0001145991", + "0001176710", + "0001567557", + "0001802048", + "0001873470", + "0001909076", + "0001986979" + ], + "0001173221": [ + "0001794525" + ], + "0001197053": [ + "0000067255", + "0001070490", + "0001389940" + ], + "0001201177": [ + "0000137324", + "0000994019", + "0001371397", + "0001682326", + "0001901354" + ], + "0001206320": [ + "0000451152", + "0000971059", + "0001229840", + "0001629574", + "0001737795" + ], + "0001216757": [ + "0000258508", + "0000304499", + "0000514162", + "0000973363", + "0001157189", + "0001291316", + "0001404351", + "0001629177", + "0001660833", + "0001781444" + ], + "0001217539": [ + "0000524481", + "0000561008", + "0001009782", + "0001690181" + ], + "0001225724": [ + "0000563752", + "0000777743", + "0000934856", + "0001142824", + "0001216757", + "0001377254", + "0001673787", + "0001811199" + ], + "0001225747": [ + "0000043023", + "0000184190", + "0000256394", + "0000456839", + "0000639309", + "0000748350", + "0000982406", + "0001373432", + "0001912825" + ], + "0001239058": [ + "0000400509", + "0000806710", + "0000863948", + "0000948575", + "0001266379", + "0001732740" + ], + "0001257548": [ + "0000042334", + "0000079786", + "0000548015", + "0000653650", + "0000867186", + "0001000760", + "0001079194", + "0001210284", + "0001347962", + "0001749633" + ], + "0001262826": [ + "0000097788", + "0000165529", + "0000208673", + "0000308296", + "0000375925", + "0000416340", + "0000428028", + "0000485405", + "0000537027", + "0000565623", + "0000621499", + "0000691088", + "0000823444", + "0000873220", + "0000963833", + "0000993745", + "0001002323", + "0001009696", + "0001106830", + "0001181032", + "0001201179", + "0001270260", + "0001340757", + "0001476134", + "0001479353", + "0001527327", + "0001560985", + "0001647347" + ], + "0001270113": [ + "0000016718", + "0000018848", + "0000070419", + "0000113785", + "0000480602", + "0000513155", + "0000569036", + "0000617715", + "0000717821", + "0000885678", + "0001074365", + "0001262738", + "0001466885", + "0001640660", + "0001684235", + "0001700381", + "0001703576", + "0165172619" + ], + "0001284785": [ + "0000003757", + "0000037279", + "0000408122", + "0000425913", + "0000809415", + "0000848773", + "0000871378", + "0001373355", + "0001575831", + "0001972968", + "0017051540" + ], + "0001285713": [ + "0000636367" + ], + "0001296130": [ + "0000613419", + "0000771267", + "0001036372", + "0001339876", + "0001600808", + "0001974675" + ], + "0001298255": [ + "0000811277", + "0000933844", + "0000996317", + "0001465492", + "0001481962", + "0001495268", + "0001542335", + "0001776911", + "0001992789" + ], + "0001300023": [ + "0000013540" + ], + "0001309482": [ + "0000166714", + "0000320814", + "0001655670" + ], + "0001312126": [ + "0000169580", + "0000807023", + "0000900679", + "0001060754", + "0001935279" + ], + "0001316576": [ + "0000351394", + "0001613617" + ], + "0001325588": [ + "0000518848", + "0000583481", + "0000902937", + "0001687667", + "0001941378" + ], + "0001345052": [ + "0001502244" + ], + "0001355522": [ + "0001466885" + ], + "0001358918": [ + "0194178068" + ], + "0001362835": [ + "0000345775", + "0000400190", + "0000588924", + "0000819496", + "0001668648" + ], + "0001365874": [ + "0000025576", + "0000123740", + "0000139594", + "0000342651", + "0000349744", + "0000380642", + "0000495339", + "0000647655", + "0001283552", + "0001472953", + "0001568071", + "0001788626" + ], + "0001373058": [ + "0000022151", + "0000587343" + ], + "0001373432": [ + "0000818106", + "0001328023" + ], + "0001378773": [ + "0000599322", + "0001143216" + ], + "0001385734": [ + "0000154519", + "0000332955", + "0000424874" + ], + "0001390531": [ + "0000512761", + "0000703393", + "0001045974", + "0001491022", + "0001775396", + "0001892430", + "0001978528", + "0013862901" + ], + "0001396529": [ + "0000032100", + "0000086313", + "0000127231", + "0000322427", + "0000324332", + "0000397076", + "0000641256", + "0000740721", + "0000783120", + "0000818283", + "0000868062", + "0000911300", + "0000942480", + "0001072049", + "0001203520", + "0001285772", + "0001333873", + "0001500215", + "0001870253", + "0001886356", + "0001916297", + "0001954329", + "0001956089" + ], + "0001418391": [ + "0000131411", + "0000399708", + "0000495433", + "0000702832", + "0000795047", + "0000799826", + "0000838066", + "0000882976", + "0001103984", + "0001216757", + "0001560316", + "0001793943", + "0001799780" + ], + "0001430396": [ + "0000242776", + "0000973363", + "0000987299", + "0001012363", + "0001652416" + ], + "0001432437": [ + "0000721271", + "0001515320", + "0001788368" + ], + "0001442890": [ + "0027391014" + ], + "0001444937": [ + "0000517737", + "0000871220", + "0001348961", + "0001635654" + ], + "0001472953": [ + "0000404039" + ], + "0001474532": [ + "0001479692" + ], + "0001482259": [ + "0000006759", + "0000039750", + "0000091201", + "0000194832", + "0000290613", + "0000547717", + "0000578191", + "0000634002", + "0000736278", + "0000766438", + "0000777743", + "0000814624", + "0000838980", + "0000882769", + "0000887203", + "0000903306", + "0000923724", + "0001000517", + "0001018531", + "0001029775", + "0001043701", + "0001092578", + "0001193965", + "0001334697", + "0001364847", + "0001370552", + "0001498531", + "0001517094", + "0001612528", + "0001683667", + "0001721191", + "0001818078", + "0001901075", + "0001905585", + "0001943218" + ], + "0001487227": [ + "0001940450" + ], + "0001494598": [ + "0000278608", + "0000373129", + "0000637056", + "0000781420", + "0000971297", + "0001117322", + "0001396941", + "0001604944", + "0001652166", + "0001696297" + ], + "0001497372": [ + "0000304499", + "0000514162", + "0000673012" + ], + "0001502516": [ + "0000993470", + "0001512454" + ], + "0001502681": [ + "0000056823", + "0000608411", + "0000632600", + "0000656976", + "0000667953", + "0000707829", + "0001136935", + "0001256432", + "0001361495", + "0001391021", + "0001710467", + "0001804557" + ], + "0001508893": [ + "" + ], + "0001518758": [ + "0000887114" + ], + "0001540511": [ + "0000070419", + "0000174941", + "0000480602", + "0000546415", + "0001135972", + "0001270113", + "0001450722", + "0001483878", + "0001640660" + ], + "0001540821": [ + "0000135147", + "0000473715" + ], + "0001541615": [ + "0000022699", + "0000054770", + "0000522631", + "0000542856", + "0000617498", + "0000943108", + "0001141333", + "0001271427", + "0001285565", + "0001295746", + "0001375132", + "0001407555", + "0001537954", + "0001653863", + "0001716456", + "0001788830", + "0014706235", + "0063447541" + ], + "0001563511": [ + "0001964132" + ], + "0001565247": [ + "0000038597", + "0000282592", + "0000470118", + "0000492752", + "0000517477", + "0000765491", + "0000909297", + "0000982107", + "0001463760", + "0001628165", + "0137734242", + "0172442656" + ], + "0001568071": [ + "0000380642", + "0000647655" + ], + "0001579664": [ + "0000185481", + "0000884309", + "0001474532", + "0001827662" + ], + "0001586918": [ + "0000151821", + "0000198782", + "0000481711", + "0000646524", + "0000927359", + "0000943850", + "0001360078", + "0001379027", + "0001398781", + "0001502681", + "0001712228", + "0001758785", + "0001802902", + "0001807066", + "0001985622" + ], + "0001595685": [ + "0000295165", + "0000386480", + "0000862612", + "0001572011", + "0001916066" + ], + "0001597981": [ + "0000901146", + "0001125147", + "0001301800", + "0001883222" + ], + "0001625974": [ + "0000041217", + "0000413768", + "0000469863", + "0000541212", + "0000768963", + "0000973037", + "0001201809", + "0001350547", + "0001432129", + "0001451408", + "0001931233" + ], + "0001628260": [ + "0000061710", + "0000467223", + "0000810491", + "0001199558", + "0001448303", + "0001543073", + "0185157692" + ], + "0001629479": [ + "0000185233", + "0000568069", + "0001471864", + "0001514049" + ], + "0001633933": [ + "0000026873", + "0001074949", + "0001227114" + ], + "0001639888": [ + "0000023675", + "0000074936", + "0000096932", + "0000274194", + "0000352610", + "0001107029", + "0001239734", + "0001590667", + "0001610615", + "0001672252" + ], + "0001646640": [ + "0000064976", + "0000086577", + "0000260702", + "0000342680", + "0000345808", + "0000391498", + "0000549062", + "0000720893", + "0000751036", + "0000801909", + "0000827604", + "0000913471", + "0001074998", + "0001276331", + "0001305721", + "0001758272", + "0001766147", + "0001960099", + "0001963880", + "0178640246" + ], + "0001666932": [ + "0000084747", + "0000383250", + "0000547298", + "0001250985", + "0001289075", + "0001371536", + "0001384214", + "0001510199", + "0001804296", + "0001911635", + "0001945180", + "0177177597" + ], + "0001667142": [ + "0000353077", + "0001250363", + "0001841230" + ], + "0001667490": [ + "0000018269", + "0000034445", + "0000609478", + "0000694154", + "0000774563", + "0000794955", + "0000967474", + "0001065826", + "0001333489", + "0001395554", + "0001484981", + "0001747159", + "0001919374", + "0093906983" + ], + "0001672668": [ + "0000358457", + "0000669113", + "0000974296", + "0001333573", + "0001806797", + "0001852954" + ], + "0001673820": [ + "0000040124", + "0000624350", + "0000944188", + "0001000149", + "0001262826", + "0001627634", + "0001722031", + "0001880845", + "0001901025", + "0001902609", + "0001910861" + ], + "0001679719": [ + "0000485657", + "0001483559", + "0001522783", + "0001732098", + "0001847433", + "0001929182" + ], + "0001679740": [ + "0001992471" + ], + "0001688372": [ + "0000682224", + "0000693496", + "0000871220", + "0000958552", + "0001060766", + "0001159364", + "0001646640", + "0001732064", + "0001893286", + "0178640246" + ], + "0001690960": [ + "0000105132", + "0000298190", + "0000419395", + "0000473527", + "0000476355", + "0000692982", + "0000707752", + "0001031996", + "0001127301", + "0001204171", + "0001869233", + "0001915577", + "0047177633" + ], + "0001696091": [ + "0000777448", + "0000853570", + "0001043321", + "0001055016", + "0001221178", + "0001312126", + "0001344060", + "0001479705", + "0001957166" + ], + "0001703516": [ + "0000200713", + "0000372465", + "0000396793", + "0000700585", + "0001035490", + "0001367964", + "0001376906", + "0001431069", + "0001879039" + ], + "0001714839": [ + "0000020762", + "0000021773", + "0000024818", + "0000027891", + "0000032134", + "0000033396", + "0000082588", + "0000120358", + "0000198371", + "0000258508", + "0000320843", + "0000321652", + "0000328927", + "0000364995", + "0000409321", + "0000419916", + "0000470241", + "0000493792", + "0000603736", + "0000623976", + "0000707735", + "0000716347", + "0000725224", + "0000791627", + "0000865455", + "0000870844", + "0001013581", + "0001053542", + "0001073516", + "0001104902", + "0001159177", + "0001201636", + "0001204286", + "0001230460", + "0001233720", + "0001239855", + "0001247047", + "0001291316", + "0001293816", + "0001340113", + "0001404351", + "0001427520", + "0001448438", + "0001464523", + "0001506108", + "0001546265", + "0001609886", + "0001653713", + "0001682508", + "0001683423", + "0001716282", + "0001752601", + "0001854752", + "0001880654", + "0001907321", + "0001907642", + "0001945293", + "0001992295" + ], + "0001726678": [ + "0001065786", + "0001349212", + "0001362508" + ], + "0001727920": [ + "0000014934", + "0001243994", + "0001423213", + "0001532536", + "0001609169", + "0001644821", + "0001646263", + "0001664924", + "0001789616", + "0001803911", + "0001882636" + ], + "0001731250": [ + "0000193060", + "0000494781", + "0000537129", + "0000880032", + "0001175689", + "0001181080", + "0001734007", + "0001787567", + "0001924533", + "0001925650" + ], + "0001732064": [ + "0000008308", + "0000494408", + "0000541216", + "0000681436" + ], + "0001733752": [ + "0000101302", + "0000153131", + "0000252896", + "0000461959", + "0000498347", + "0001050590", + "0001169813", + "0001201177", + "0001732740" + ], + "0001737987": [ + "0000027891", + "0000030721", + "0000053190", + "0000123653", + "0000649164", + "0000809949", + "0000882976", + "0001012382", + "0001022888", + "0001225724", + "0001628697", + "0001644913" + ], + "0001749406": [ + "0000690534", + "0000693740", + "0000844819", + "0000961304", + "0001125589", + "0001298157", + "0001553344", + "0001954076", + "0001994207" + ], + "0001752601": [ + "0000865455", + "0001464523" + ], + "0001753677": [ + "0000923724", + "0000941355", + "0001613412" + ], + "0001778713": [ + "0000405874", + "0001268723", + "0001683696" + ], + "0001794806": [ + "0000206819", + "0001748770" + ], + "0001804857": [ + "0000056195", + "0000317785", + "0000345078", + "0000424874", + "0000608874", + "0000729546", + "0000839441", + "0001008845", + "0001237020", + "0001345052", + "0001385734", + "0001450722", + "0118959948" + ], + "0001839963": [ + "0001486850" + ], + "0001847433": [ + "0001862896" + ], + "0001848445": [ + "0000509411", + "0001724645", + "0001731694", + "0001856855" + ], + "0001854419": [ + "0000069966", + "0000135147", + "0000149357", + "0000368132", + "0000405121", + "0000413918", + "0000470583", + "0000569612", + "0000791759", + "0000859552", + "0000949985", + "0001162044", + "0001281733", + "0001749406", + "0001753520", + "0001805239", + "0001938300", + "0110140082", + "0134666630", + "0146239523" + ], + "0001854454": [ + "0000011301", + "0000115219", + "0000458443", + "0000711835", + "0000813304", + "0000872584", + "0000908692", + "0001195051", + "0001331409", + "0001376894", + "0001427552" + ], + "0001855966": [ + "0000386205" + ], + "0001857950": [ + "0000025987", + "0000245155", + "0000427436", + "0000806892", + "0001286989" + ], + "0001860679": [ + "0000056823", + "0000179764", + "0000646292", + "0000723828", + "0001547506" + ], + "0001860806": [ + "0000269124", + "0000381270", + "0000937758", + "0001298755", + "0001316416", + "0001652552", + "0001758576" + ], + "0001864396": [ + "" + ], + "0001873699": [ + "0000004354", + "0000050708", + "0000301789", + "0000815634", + "0001011716", + "0001182818" + ], + "0001909159": [ + "0000006974", + "0000011301", + "0000027168", + "0000198519", + "0000237469", + "0000587105", + "0000676085", + "0000907602", + "0000933603", + "0000956729", + "0001173428", + "0001409672", + "0001537139", + "0001660757", + "0001822596", + "0001828707", + "0001863886" + ], + "0001924884": [ + "0000802605", + "0000844585", + "0000894621", + "0000942511", + "0001451490", + "0001480227", + "0001630921", + "0001748864", + "0001861358", + "0001993975" + ], + "0001934801": [ + "0000206286" + ], + "0001943102": [ + "0000369003", + "0000761967", + "0000979282", + "0001251155", + "0001431359", + "0001790472" + ], + "0001956690": [ + "0000009122", + "0000307021", + "0000307495", + "0000425869", + "0000545301", + "0001388203", + "0001496005", + "0001505859", + "0001585519", + "0001718159", + "0001945016" + ], + "0001971819": [ + "0174910953" + ], + "0001979210": [ + "0000130103", + "0000199139", + "0000366376", + "0001087177", + "0001679740" + ], + "0001988443": [ + "0000042052", + "0000412256", + "0000434894", + "0000450563", + "0000566292", + "0000625579", + "0000713954", + "0000742753", + "0000752334", + "0000789425", + "0001092479", + "0001139160", + "0001231997", + "0001461059", + "0001642889" + ], + "0001997407": [ + "0000212413", + "0000215948", + "0000497890", + "0001165068", + "0001937391" + ], + "0024858865": [ + "0000431853", + "0000791627", + "0001924249" + ], + "0031443063": [ + "0000122622", + "0000540093", + "0000547717", + "0001272035", + "0001632638", + "0001801675" + ], + "0069408974": [ + "0000282585", + "0000764031", + "0001186098", + "0001264331", + "0001646284", + "0001938608", + "0001964392", + "0048415287", + "0181685796" + ], + "0076589794": [ + "0000011266", + "0000252590", + "0000315007", + "0000594165", + "0000693512", + "0000925132", + "0001235126", + "0001245246", + "0001642416", + "0001867354", + "0152067037" + ], + "0091099808": [ + "0000013540", + "0000015322", + "0000027045", + "0000175816", + "0000290532", + "0000322504", + "0000327169", + "0000379361", + "0000627937", + "0000645192", + "0000647015", + "0000703277", + "0000708095", + "0000857240", + "0000874352", + "0000890111", + "0001004041", + "0001059476", + "0001108032", + "0001129696", + "0001186368", + "0001327287", + "0001455346", + "0001489340", + "0001511187", + "0001511319", + "0001524072", + "0001640744", + "0001727877", + "0001766147", + "0001992267", + "0056073873", + "0141201637" + ], + "0126111424": [ + "0000384581", + "0000466626", + "0000699829" + ], + "0131602535": [ + "0000046064", + "0000151821", + "0000163524", + "0000195129", + "0000213931", + "0000235803", + "0000340697", + "0000423307", + "0000672592", + "0000729673", + "0001082531", + "0001296130", + "0001490167", + "0001644913", + "0001737583" + ], + "0137734242": [ + "0000284979", + "0000673003", + "0000982107", + "0001009952", + "0001750552", + "0001767295" + ], + "0147226972": [ + "0000007060", + "0000032468", + "0000036830", + "0000442187", + "0000443172", + "0000498117", + "0000572415", + "0000609478", + "0000656567", + "0000681422", + "0000756364", + "0000890488", + "0000920129", + "0000943173", + "0001023697", + "0001068923", + "0001198034", + "0001237844", + "0001270113", + "0001343955", + "0001404216", + "0001489350", + "0001611594", + "0001662853", + "0001904388", + "0001973416", + "0001984082", + "0190973290" + ], + "0163876967": [ + "0000307021", + "0000501198", + "0000545301", + "0000717201", + "0001201493", + "0001312651", + "0001460234", + "0001724804", + "0079577238" + ], + "0178226192": [ + "0000079972", + "0000126971", + "0000349643", + "0000958552", + "0001507940", + "0001758272", + "0001964881" + ], + "0181810880": [ + "0000199143", + "0000897981", + "0000980500", + "0001246653", + "0021266288" + ] + }, + "summ": { + "4963": "The respondent assessee was assessed to wealth tax for the assessment years 1965 66, 1966 67 and 1967 68, in the status of a Hindu Undivided Family '.\nIn each of the assessment years, the Wealth Tax Officer included a sum of Rs. 1.5 lakhs estimated as the accrued interest on the assessee 's money lending investments.\nThe assessee appealed to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, con tending that as the books of account were maintained in accordance with the cash system of accounting, the accrued interest on the money lending investment could not be included in the Wealth Tax assessments, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner following the decision of the Orissa High Court in Commissioner of Wealth tax Bihar and Orissa vs Vysyaraju Badreenarayana Moorthy Raju (Orissa) (1971)79 ITR 330 deleted the additions representing accrued interest.\nThe Wealth Tax Officer, appealed to the Appellate Tribunal and con tended that the accrued interest was liable to be included in the Wealth Tax assessment of the assessee, relying on the judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Vedrevu Venkappa Rao vs Commissioner of Wealth Tax A.P.\nThe Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, as it was bound by the decision of the Orissa High Court.\nThe Commissioner of Wealth Tax applied under Section 27(1) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957 for a reference to the Supreme Court in view of the conflict of opinions between the Orissa High Court and the Andhra Pradesh High Court and the question: \"Whether the Wealth Tax Officer was justified in including in the net wealth of the assessee, interest due on accrual basis (though not realised) on the outstandings 307 of the assessee 's money lending business, the accounts being maintained on cash,\" was referred to this Court.\n^ HELD: 1.\nEven though the accounts of the assessee are maintained on cash basis interest due on accrual basis, though not realised, on the out standings of the money, lending business is liable to be included in the net wealth of the assessee.\n[310G] 2.\nThe value of a property refers to the value of the rights in that property.\nWhat accrues as a right also falls to be included within the assets of an assessee under the Wealth Tax Act 1957.\n[310F] 2.1.\nThe system of accounting, mercantile or cash or hybrid, is of no relevance for the purpose of determining the assets of the assessee.\nThat appears plainly from the definition of \"net wealth\" which speaks of \"the aggregate value. of all the assets\" belonging to the assessee on the valuation date.\nAll the assets of the assessee, bar those expressly excepted by the statute, are to be taken into account, and it is immaterial whether the assessee employs one system of accounting or another.\n[310 C D] 3.\nThe assets are not confined to cash.\nWhere the asset is an asset other than cash, its value is determined pursuant to sub section (I) of section 7 as the estimated price, which, in the opinion of the Wealth Tax Officer, the asset would fetch if sold in the open market on the valuation date.\nIt would be the estimated open market value of the rights in the property which constitute the asset.\n[310E F] Vedrevu Venkappa Rao vs Commissioner of Wealth tax A.P. , Commissioner of Wealth, Tax.\nA.P_I. vs Pachigolla Narasimha Rao, and Dipta Kumar Basu vs Commissioner oz Wealth Tax, West Bengal, , approved.\nCommissioner of Wealth tax Bihar and Orissa vs Vysyaraju Badreenarayana MoorthY Raju (Orissa) and A.T. Mirji vs Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Karnataka, Over ruled.", + "5994": "The respondent, in the appeal, was in charge of prepa r ing the pay bills of the employees of the Beas Sutlej Li nk Project.\nHe, along with other two employees, was charg ed with the fraudulent act of withdrawal of Rs.238.90 by pr e paring a bogus pay bill and identity card in the name of a fictitious person.\nAn enquiry was conducted against all t he three employees under the Punjab Government Servants Condu ct Rules, 1966 and the Inquiry Officer found all the thr ee guilty of the charge framed against each of them.\nThe comp e tent authority accepted the findings of the Inquiry Offic er and after giving an opportunity of being heard imposed t he penalty of dismissal on the respondent.\nMinor penalty of with holding two or three future increments was imposed on each of the other two employees.\nThe respondent challeng ed the finding of the Inquiry Officer as well as the order of dismissal by filing a writ petition in the High Court of Himachal Pradesh.\nSubsequently the writ stood transferred to the Central Administrative Tribunal under the 20 provisions of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985.\nT he Tribunal agreed with the findings recorded by the Inqui ry Officer to the effect that the respondent was guilty of t he charge but modified the punishment by reducing the punis h ment of dismissal imposed to that of stopping his fi ve increments on the ground that the respondent was measur ed with a different yardstick than the other two employee section Against the aforesaid order of the Tribunal appeals we re filed before this Court; (a) by the Union of India conten d ing that the tribunal has no powers to interfere with t he punishment imposed by the disciplinary authority on t he ground that it is disproportionate to the proved misdeme a nour, and (b) by the respondent seeking a complete exoner a tion from the charge.\nWhile allowing the appeal of the Union and dismissi ng the Special Leave Petition of the respondent the Court s et aside the order of the Tribunal, and, HELD: 1.\nUnder the provisions of the Administrati ve Tribunal Act, 1985 the powers of the High Courts und er Article 226, in so far as they are exercisable in relati on to service matters stand conferred on the Tribunal esta b lished under the Act.\nThe powers of other ordinary civ il Courts in relation to service matters to try all suits of a civil nature excepting suits of which their cognisan ce either expressly or impliedly barred also stand conferred on the Tribunal.\nThe Act thus excludes the jurisdiction, pow er and authority of all Courts except the Supreme Court a nd confers the same on the Tribunal in relation to recruitme nt and service matters.\nThe Tribunal is just a substitute to the civil Court and High Court.\nThe Tribunal thus cou ld exercise only such powers which the civil Court or the Hi gh Court could have exercised by way of judicial review.\nIt is neither less nor more.\n[27D E; 28B C1 S.P. Sampat Kumar vs Union of India & Ors., ; referred to; 2.\nThe jurisdiction of the Tribunal to interfere wi th the disciplinary matters or punishment cannot be equat ed with an appellate jurisdiction.\nThe Tribunal cannot inte r fere with the findings of the Inquiry Officer or compete nt authority where they are not arbitrary or utterly pervers e.\nThe power to impose penalty on a delinquent officer is conferred on the competent authority either by an Act of legislature or rules made under the proviso to Article 3 09 of the Constitution.\nIf there has been an enquiry consiste nt with the rules and in accordance with principles of natur al justice what punishment would meet the 21 ends of justice is a matter exclusively within the jurisdi c tion of the competent authority.\nIf the penalty can lawful ly be imposed and is imposed on the proved misconduct, t he Tribunal has no power to substitute its own discretion f or that of the authority.\nThe adequacy of penalty unless it is malafide is certainly not a matter for the Tribunal to concern with.\nThe Tribunal also cannot interfere with t he penalty if the conclusion of the Inquiry Officer or t he competent authority is based on evidence even if some of it is found to be irrelevant or extraneous to the matte r. [33D F] State of Orissa vs Bidyabhushan, [1963] (Suppl.) 1 S.C.R. 648; Dhirajlal Girdharilal vs Commissioner of Income Tax, A.I.R. 1955 S.C. 271; State of Maharashtra vs B.K. Takkamore & Ors.\n, ; ; Zora Singh vs J.M. Tandon, A.I.R. 1971 S.C. 1537; Railway Board vs Nira n jan Singh; , ; State of U.P. vs O. P. Gupta, A.I.R. 1970 S.C. 679 and Union of India vs Sarda rr Bahadur, , applied.\nBhagat Ram vs State of Himachal Pradesh, [1983] 2 S.C. C. 442, distinguished.\nThere is one exception to this proposition.\nThere m ay be cases where the penalty is imposed under clause (a) of the second proviso to Article 311(2) of the Constitutio n.\nWhere the person, without enquiry is dismissed, removed or reduced in rank solely on the basis of conviction by a criminal court, the Tribunal may examine the adequacy of t he penalty imposed in the light of the conviction and senten ce inflicted on the person.\nIf the penalty impugned is appa r ently unreasonable or uncalled for, having regard to t he nature of the criminal charge, the Tribunal may step in to render substantial justice.\nThe Tribunal may remit t he matter to the competent authority for reconsideration or by itself substitute one of the penalities provided und er clause (a).\n[35E F] Union of India vs Tulsiram PateI, 8, applied.\nSince the respondent had made his choice of forum a nd was even otherwise dealt with under the Government Serva nt (Conduct) Rules which are applicable to him it cannot be held that he falls into the category of a workman empoweri ng the Central Administrative Tribunal to exercise the powe rs of an Industrial Court for giving appropriate relief.\n[35 F G] 22", + "7130": "The plaintiff, predecessor in interest of the appellants, flied a suit for a declaration and an injunction to restrain the defendant respondents from dispossessing him from a certain property comprising of a coconut grove.\nThe trial court dismissed the suit holding that the, plaintiff was no more in possession of the suit property, and, therefore, a suit for a mere declaration simplicitor could not lie.\nConsequently, the plaintiff flied another suit for restoration of possession.\nHis case was that he was a tenant of the suit property, whereof defendant No. 2 was the owners ' and 1016 that he was forcibly dispossessed by defendant No. 1, in collusion with defendant No. 2, without his tenancy having been lawfully terminated.\nIt was alleged that the defendants were trespassers and liable to be evicted.\nThe defendants, besides raising the pleas of res judicata and/or constructive res judicata purported to be based on Order 2 Rule 2(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, contended that defendant No. 1 was in lawful possession of the suit property as the same was let out to him by defendant No. 2 after the lease in favour of the plaintiff stood terminated by efflux of time, and the suit, as such, was not maintainable.\nThe trial court decreed the suit holding that the suit property was demised to the plaintiff as he was the lawful tenant thereof, and defendant No. 1 in collusion with defendant No. 2 wrongfully dispossessed him.\nThe appeal riled by the defendants was dismissed by the first appellate court.\nThe second appeals filed by the defendants were allowed by the High Court holding that the suit was barred by res judicata as well as Order 2 Rule 2(3) C.P.C.\nThe High Court also held that during the pendency of the suit as a result of the amendment of the Goa, Daman and Diu Agricultural Tenancy Act, 1964 by Act 17 of 1976, known as the Fifth Amendment, the definition of 'agriculture ' was changed and the suit property came to be covered within the expression 'agricultural land ' which rendered the civil court without jurisdiction and the decree passed by it unsustainable.\nAggrieved, the heirs and legal representatives of the plaintiff, filed the appeal by special leave.\nAllowing the appeal, this Court, HELD: 1.1 A subsequent suit would be barred by res judicata only when the subject matter of the suit was directly and substantially in issue in the previous suit.\n[p. 1022 C] 1.2.\nThe first suit was dismissed on a technical ground that the suit for a mere declaration without seeking consequential relief of possession could not lie.\nIn that suit the issue regarding the status of the plaintiff as a lessee was not settled once for all and hence that issue could not be stated to be barred by res judicata in the subsequent suit brought by the lessee for possession of the demised property.\nThe High Court was not right in holding 1017 that the second suit was barred by res judicata.\n1022 F H] 2.1.\nOrder 2 Rule 2 CPC is based on,the salutory principle that a defendant or defendants should not be twice vexed for the same cause by splitting the claim and the reliefs.\nIt does not preclude a second suit based.\non a distinct cause of action.\n[p. 1023 C E] 2.2.\nThe doctrine of res judicata differs from the rule embodied In Order 2 Rule 2, in that, the former places emphasis on the plaintiff 's duty to exhaust all available grounds in support of his claim while the latter requires the plaintiff to claim all reliefs emanating from the same cause of action.\n[p. 1023 E] 2.3.\nThe cause of action for the former suit was based on an apprehension that the defendants were likely to forcibly dispossess the plaintiff.\nThe suit was for an injunction and not for possession of the demised property.\nIt was not on the premise that the plaintiff had in fact been illegally and forcibly dispossessed and needed the court 's assistance to be restored to possession.\nTherefore, the subsequent suit was based on a distinct cause of action not found in the former suit.\nThe High Court was not right in concluding that the suit was barred by Order 2 Role 2(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, and that the difference in the reliefs claimed in the two suits was immaterial and irrelevant.\nIn the previous suit, the relief for possession was not claimed whereas in the second suit the relief was for restoration of possession.\nThat makes all the difference.\n[pp. 1023 F, 1024 B D] 3.1.\nThe impact of the Fifth Amendment on pending litigation is that the question of tenancy in regard to agricultural land cannot be decided by the civil court under the Act and there being no express saying clause permitting the civil court to decide the same, any decision rendered by the civil court would be without jurisdiction.\nThe change in law deprived the civil court of jurisdiction which it undoubtedly possessed on the date of the institution of the suit.\nThus, the provisions of the Fifth Amendment would apply to pending suits also.\n[pp. 1027 D E; 1028 D E; 1029 C] Shah Bhojraj Kuverji Oil Mills and Ginning Factory vs Subhash Chandra Yograj Sinha; , , relied on.\nThe Act does not preclude the institution of a suit by a tenant 1018 for restoration of possession from a trespasser.\n[p. 1029 C] 3.3.\nIf a suit Is riled to recover possession of agricultural land from a trespasser and no dispute arises, the adjudication whereof is required to be done by the special machinery set up under the Act, the civil court will continue to have jurisdiction.\n[p. 1027 F G] 3A.\nIf possession of agricultural land is sought on the plea that the defendant is a trespasser and the defendant contends that he is a tenant, the claim of tenancy by defendant cannot be gone into by the civil court in view of the clear language of S.7 read with section 58(2) of the Act In such a situation, it would not stand to reason to non suit the plaintiff who had flied the suit in a competent court having jurisdiction to try the same, merely because of the subsequent change in law.\nThe proper course, therefore, would be that the issue whether the defendant was a tenant should be referred to the Mamlatdar for decision and, after his decision is received by the civil court, if the issue is held against the defendant, the civil court may consider passing of a. decree.\nfor eviction but if, on the other hand, he is held to be a tenant, the civil court may be required to dismiss the suit [pp. 1029 F H; 1030 A B; 1031 D E] Bhimaji Shankar Kulkam vs Dundappa Vithappa Udapudi & Anr., ; =. ; and Dhondi Tukaram vs Hari Dadu, AIR 1954 Bom.\n100 = ILR , relied on.\nThe impact of Fifth Amendment may give rise to a situation where a deemed tenant under s.4 of the Act is evicted from the land on or after 1st July, 1962; his remedy under s.8(2) is to approach the authority under the Act for recovery of possession of the land of which he has been disposed, and jurisdiction of the civil court stands wholly barred by virtue of s.58(2) of the Act as it would not be competent to pass any order for restoration of possession to the deemed tenant.\nIf such a situation arises in a pending suit which was instituted in a competent court having jurisdiction at the date of its institution, it would be unfair to non suit the plaintiff altogether for no fault of his own and the proper course would be to follow in spirit the procedure outlined in Order 7, Rules 10 and 10A, C.P.C. [pp. 1031 F H; 1032 A B] 4.\nThe High Court lacked jurisdiction to decide the question regarding tenancy on merits.\nIts order is set aside and the matter is remitted to 1019 the trial court to determine the course of action to be adopted in accordance with the guideline indicated hereinabove.\n[p. 1032 D F]", + "6118": "The petitioners employed as daily rated carpenters at the Wood Working Centre of the Himachal Pradesh State Handi crafts Corporation sought enforcement of their fundamental right to have \"equal pay for equal work\" in terms paid to their counterparts in regular services, or in the alterna tive, the minimum wages prescribed by the Deputy Commission er for like categories of workmen.\nThe petitioners ' claim was resisted by the respondents.\nTheir case was that the unit where the petitioners were working was a factory registered under the Factories Act, that they were treated as industrial workmen and given all benefits due to them under the various labour legislations, that the Government had not fixed the minimum wages payable to the workmen engaged in the Corporation or other like industries but the Corporation had adopted for its workmen the minimum wages payable for similar work in the construc tion industry, and that there were no regular employees of the petitioners ' categories in its establishment and, as such, the question of payment to them the pay admissible to regular employees does not arise.\nDismissing the writ petition, HELD: 1.\nUnless it is shown that there is a discrimina tion amongst the same set of employees by the same master in the same establishment, the principle of \"equal pay for equal work\" cannot be enforced.\nA comparison cannot be made with counterparts in other establishments with different management, or even in establishments in different geograph ical location though owned by the same master.\n[668B] In the instant case, the petitioners were employed by a company incorporated under the Companies Act.\nThey cannot claim wages pay 663 able to their counterparts in government service.\n[668C] Meva Ram Kanojia vs All India Institute of Medical Sciences & Anr., ; , referred to.\nRandhir Singh vs Union of India, ; , ex plained.\nThe principle of 'equal pay for equal work ' has no mechanical application in every case of similar work.\nNo two jobs by the mere nomenclature or by the volume of work performed can be rated as equal.\nIt is not just a comparison of physical activity.\nIt requires the consideration of various dimensions of the job.\nThe accuracy required by the job and the dexterity it entails may differ from job to job.\nIt cannot be evaluated by the mere averments in the self serving affidavits or counter affidavits of the parties.\nIt must be left to be evaluated and determined by expert body.\n[666D, 668D E] In the instant case, however, the Corporation had no regularly employed carpenters.\nEven assuming that the peti tioners ' jobs were comparable with the counterparts in Government service they could not enforce the right to equal pay for equal work.\n[667G, 668A] State of U.P. vs J.P. Chaurasia, ; ; Meva Ram Kanojia vs All India Institute of Medical Sciences & Anr., ; and Federation of All India Customs and Central Excise Stenographers (Recognised) vs Union of India, ; , referred to.\nThe order issued by the Deputy Commissioner on March 20, 1986 in exercise of his powers under the H.P. Financial Rules prescribing minimum wages was applicable only to skilled and unskilled workers in Class IV employees in Government service.\nThe benefit of the rates prescribed under that order cannot be extended to the petitioners unless the Government makes it applicable to the employees of the Corporation.\n[668F G]", + "4860": "In Sessions Case No. 26 of 1976, seven accused namely Sitarama @ Sitya, Sundera @ Sundarayya, Kishana @ Kishanayya, Gangarama @ Gangayya, Prakash, Vinayak and Shrirang were charged and tried together for offences under section 302 read with section 120B and also under section 302 read with section 34 I.P.C. Charge No. 1 was for criminal conspiracy under section 302 read with section 120B I.P.C. on the allegation that between first week of October, 1975 and 2nd January, 1976 at Babultara and Waghala villages all the seven accused and the approver P.W. 1 entered into a criminal conspiracy to commit murders of young girls and women in the vicinity of Babultara village by injuring the victims or disfiguring their faces in order to make it appear that the accused in an earlier case called the Manwath murders case where 10 girls and women were murdered during the period from 14.11.1972 to 4.11.1974 in Manwath village were not the real culprits.\nCharges 2 to 4 were framed under section 302 read with section 34 I.P.C. alleging that in furtherance of their common intention, accused 1 to 3 committed the murder of Ashamati on or about 10th November, 1975, accused 1 to 4 committed the murder of Parubai on or about 29th November, 1975 and accused 1, 6 and 7 committed the murder of Malan on or about 1st January, 1976.\nThe Sessions Judge on a consideration of the evidence acquitted all the seven accused under charge No. 1; all the accused under charges 2 and 3 and accused 7 under charge No. 4, but convicted accused 1 and 6 under charge No. 4 and sentenced them to undergo imprisonment for life under section 302 read with section 34 I.P.C. Aggrieved by the conviction and sentence accused 1 and 6 filed Criminal Appeal No. 7 of 1977 in the High Court of Bombay, while the State preferred Criminal Appeal No. 38 of 1977 for enhancement of the sentence awarded to them under section 377 Cr.\nThe State also preferred under section 378 Cr.\nP.C. Criminal Appeal No. 605 of 1978 against the acquittal of accused 2, 34, 5 and 7 of charge No. 1 framed under section 302 read with section 120B.\nThere 780 being no further appeal by the State against acquittal; the acquittal of accused 1 and 6 of charge No. 1 and of accused 1 to 3 of charge No. 2 and of accused 1 to 4 of charge No. 3 became final.\nThe High Court considered the evidence, in the case, and dismissed Criminal Appeals Nos. 7 of 1977 and the connected Criminal State Appeal No. 38 of 1977 and thereby confirmed the conviction and the sentence awarded to accused Nos. 1 and 6.\nThe High Court, however accepted the State Appeal No. 605 of 1978 in part and convicted accused 5 and sentenced him to imprisonment for life under section 302 I.P.C. read with section 120B.\nHence the present appeals by accused 5 and 6 only, accused No. 1 not preferring an appeal.\nAllowing the appeal No. 288 of 1980 of accused No. 5 and dismissing appeal No. 287 of 1980, the Court.\n^ HELD: 1.\nIn view of the fact (a) that accused 1 and 6 had been acquitted by the trial court of charge No. 1, that is, criminal conspiracy under section 120B read with section 302 I.P.C. (b) that no State Appeal against their acquittal had been preferred and (c) that accused 5 was not a party to charge No. 4 which was framed against accused nos.\n1, 6 and 7 the conviction and sentence of accused No. 5 by the High Court is unsustainable in law.\n[783FG] Topandas vs State of Bombay referred to. 2.\nThe retracted judicial confession of accused 5 could not be relied upon against accused 6 in this case in view of the fact that accused 6 who had been tried alongwith accused 5 had been acquitted by the High Court of the charge of conspiracy under section 302 read with section 120B I.P.C. and accused 5 was not a party for the offence of murder of Malan for which only accused nos.\n1, 6 and 7 were tried.\n[785E F] 3.\nHowever, the conviction and sentence of imprisonment for life under section 302 read with section 341 I.P.C awarded to accused 6 is in order as there is sufficient evidence against him proving his guilt in respect of charge No. 4 framed regarding the murder of Malan beyond all reasonable doubt.\nThe evidence of the approver P.W. 1 and the retracted confession of accused 6 Exh.\n138 with the corroborative evidence namely, the recovery of the bloodstained razor and the medical evidence of Dr. Suresh who conducted the autopsy and deposed that out of the antemortem injuries, injuries 1 to 7 collectively were sufficient to cause death in the ordinary course, conclusively prove the guilt of accused 6.\n[786A B; 785F G; 786A]", + "660": "The mode of proving a will does not ordinarily differ from that of proving any other document except as to the special requirement of attestation prescribed in the case of a will by section 63 of the Indian Succession Act.\nProof in either case cannot be mathematically precise and certain and so the test should be one of satisfaction of a prudent mind in such matters.\nThe onus must be on the propounder and in absence of suspicious circumstances surrounding the execution of the will, proof of testamentary capacity and signature of the testator as required by law may be sufficient to discharge the onus.\nWhere, however, there are suspicious circumstances, the onus would be on the propounder to explain them to the satis faction of the Court before the will can be accepted as genuine.\nIf the caveator alleges undue influence, fraud or coercion the onus will be on him to prove the same.\nWhere there are no such pleas but the circumstances give rise to such doubts, it is for the propounder to satisfy the conscience of the Court.\nWhat are suspicious circumstances must be judged in the facts and circumstances of each particular case.\nIf the propounder takes a prominent part in the execution of the will which confers substantial benefits on him, that itself is a suspicious circumstance attending the execution of the will and in appreciating the evidence in such a case, the court should proceed with an open but nevertheless vigilant and cautious mind.\nHarmes vs Hinkson, , Fulton vs Andrew, , Barry vs Butlin, [1838] 2 MOO.\nP.C. 480, Vallasamy Servai vs Sivaraman Servai, (1929) L.R. 57 I.A. 96 and Sarat Kumar Bibi vs Sakhi Chand, (1928) L. R. 56 1.\nA. 62, referred to.\nCase law discussed.\nIn the instant case the appellant, as the sole executor to a will, brought the suit out of which the appeal arises, for a declaration that the testatrix was the owner of certain properties and was as such entitled to dispose of them by the will and asked for consequential reliefs purporting to give effect to the bequests made by her.\nIt appeared from the evidence that the appellant took a prominent, if not a decisive, part in the execution of the 427 will, which contained substantial bequests in favour of his sons.\nBut there was no evidence to show that the draft was ever approved by the testatrix or that the will was fully read out to her and she knew its contents.\nThe trial court decreed the suit but the High Court dismissed the same.\nHeld, that the High Court was right in setting aside the finding of the trial court that the will had been duly and validly executed.\nHeld further, that the trial court was in error in holding that the proof of signature in the instant case could raise a presumption as to the testator 's knowledge of the contents of the will.\nSurendra Nath Chatterji vs Jahnavi Charan Mukherji, Cal. 390, explained and approved.", + "3436": "Entry 4 of the I Schedule of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957, reads: Cinematographic equipment including. parts and accessories required for use therewith.\non the question whether Arc Carbons, known as 'Cinama Arc Carbons ' manufactured by the appellant fall under the entry and their sales were, there fore, rightly subjected to sales tax.\n^ HELD: The meaning of an entry can only be satisfactorily determined in the light of the language of the entry itself considered in the context in which it occurs.\nand cases relating to totally different entries will have only a very remote bearing.\nEntry 4 occurs in a Schedule of taxable goods.\nWhen it was intended to confine an entry to particular gadgets and 'parts thereof ' the entry said so.\nEntry 4, however, includes 'parts ' as well as 'accessories '.\nThe term 'accessories ' is used to describe goods which may have been manufactured for use as an aid or addition to particular machines, though, they may serve as aids to other kinds of instruments also.\nBut, this entry and other entries use the expression 'required for use therewith '.\nThe description of the goods in these entries indicates that the expression has been employed for equipment or accessories connected with the main purpose.\nTherefore, it is its general of predominant use that determines the category in which an article will fall.\n[563D F, G; 564B C] In the present case, the main use of Arc Carbons was proved to be that of production of powerful light used in projectors in Cinemas.\nThe fact that they can also be used for other purposes such as for search lights etc., will not detract from their classification under Entry 4.\nThe classification is determined by their ordinary or common known purpose or user which is evident from he fact thy are known as 'cinema Arc Carbons ' in the market.\n[564 F H]", + "6276": "The Petitioners in these petitions have challenged the validity of a Notification issued by the Government of Gujarat on June 25, 1985 whereby the Gujarat Minor Mineral Rules were amended with effect from 1.7.1985.\nBy the said notification, original Rule 21 of the Rules was substituted by a new Rule 21 which provided that a holder of a quarry lease or any other mineral concession granted under the Rules shall pay royalty in respect of minor minerals provid ed in column 2 of the Schedule.\nIt is under this Notifica tion that the rate of royalty in respect of Black trap and Hard Murrum was increased from Rs.4 to Rs. 7 per metric tonne.\nThe validity of Rule 21 as it stood prior to its amend ment by the aforesaid impugned notification was considered and upheld by this Court on March 6, 1986 in D.K. Trivedi & Sons & Ors.\nvs State of Gujarat & Ors.\n, ; The impugned notification was issued at a time when the Writ Petitions in the aforesaid case were pending in the High Court.\nThe increase in the levy of royalty effected by the impugned notification is now questioned in these petitions.\nThe Petitioners raised the following contentions viz; (1) That the royalty levied and covered under the Rules should be applied only for mineral development and since the royalty is being treated as part of the consolidated fund of the State and used for other purposes by the State, the levy was bad; and (2) That the impugned notification in question was in contravention of clause (c) of article 304 of the constitution.\n(3) That the impugned notification is discriminatory in character.\n407 Dismissing the Writ Petitions, this Court, HELD: That Act is no doubt passed for development of minerals but while discharging its functions relating to development, if the State incidentally allows mining to be carried on in the public interest and levies in that connec tion a tax, it does not mean that the said tax should be used only for development of minerals and not for other purposes sanctioned by law.\n[412B] The India Cement Ltd. etc.\nvs The State of Tamil Nadu etc., [1989] 4 SC Judgment Today 190.\nNo restriction is being imposed on the freedom of trade of the petitioners by the levy of royalty.\nThe minerals belong to the Government and if anybody wants to have the right as a lessee to exploit the mines to the exclusion of others and to remove the minerals with a view to making profit, he has to pay a royalty imposed in accordance with law.\n[412E] In the instant case, the levy is made under a law made by the Central Government.\nIt is not an imposition made by a law made by the State Legislature on which alone, the re striction contemplated under article 304(b) applies.\n[412F] If the Executive or the administrative authority acts in an arbitrary manner, its action would be bad in law and liable to be struck down by the Courts but the possibility of abuse of power or arbitrary exercise of power cannot invalidate the statute conferring the power or the power which has been conferred by it.\n[413B C] Since the power exercised is legislative in character, the authority which is exercising the said power has the power to make Rules equitable by necessary implication.\nNo express power need be conferred on such subordinate authori ty in order to make a classification for purposes of imple menting the policy of the Act under which the Rules are made.\n[415G]", + "2727": "The appellant was elected as a trustee of a temple for one year.\nThe temple was rounded two hundred years ago by the members of the community and according to the usage of the temple, the trustees were elected for one year, at a meeting of the members of the community.\nOn the question whether the appellant has a hereditary trustee, because he was, under section 6(9) of the Madras Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1951, the 'trustee of a religious institution succession to whose office is regulated by usage ', HELD: The phrase 'succession to whose office is regulated by usage ' would only apply when the ordinary rules of succession under the Hindu law are modified by usage, and succession has to be determined in accordance with the modified rules.\nThe office of a hereditary trustee is in the nature of property.\nSuccession in relation to property implies passing of an interest from one person to another.\n[428 C D] In the present case, the election to the office was for a fixed period of one year.\nIn such a case, it is not possible to say there is a succession to the office, because: (a) on the efflux of the period for which one trustee is appointed, there is a vacancy and another is elected to that vacancy, and (b) since there is a possibility of the same trustee being reelected, an impossible legal position arises in which a person could be a successor of himself.\n[429 F H] In re Hindu Women 's Right to Property Act, 1941 , Ganesh Chunder Dhur vs Lal Behary, 63 I.A. 448, Bhabatarini vs Ashalata, 70 I.A. 57, Angurbala Mullick vs Debabrata Mullick, 1134 and Sital Das vs Sant Ram, A.I.R. 1954 S.C. 606 applied.\nShri Mahant Paramananda Das Goswwami vs Radhakrishna Das. , referred to.\nState of Madras vs Ramakrishna, I.L.R. , approved.", + "3356": "The appellant along with \"J\" & '.T\" was charged for offences u/s 120B/109/ 302 I.P.C. as well as 302/34 I.P.C. The trial which proceeded in the absence of absconding \"T\", resulted in the conviction and both the accused were sentenced to death sentence.\nOn a reference and appeals by the accused the High Court acquitted \"J\" rejecting four out of five eye witnesses and disbelieving even the only other eye witness who lodged the First Information Report.\nThe High Court however maintained the conviction and confirmed the death sentence on the appellant relying on the testimony of the very same single witness.\non appeal by special leave, the Court ^ HELD: (i) Ordinarily in an appeal under article 136 of the Constitution the Court would hesitate to go into the facts to reappreciate the evidence.\nIt is, however.\nnot possible to adopt that course, where the testimony of the sole witness has been rejected with reference to the second accused was on the same boat with the appellant.\nWhen the accused is going to lose his life in such a serious charge u/s 302 I.P.C. it is only necessary that the Court should be circumspect and closely scrutinise the evidence to come to an unhesitating conclusion that the sole single witness is absolutely reliable.\n[710G, H, 711H, 712A] (ii) In the instant case, the High Court was not correct in appreciating the ocular testimony of a sole witness, because (a) the very fact that the eye witness could be persuaded to substitute PWs.\n1, 2. and 3 for his deceased brother as chasing the assailants, contrary to the version of the F.I.R. degrades him from the status of an absolutely reliable witness, not having a qualm of conscience, but an obliging and untrustworthy witness.\n[710H] (b) 'The version in the F.I.R. stands contradicted by the testimony in court on a very material point and does not corroborate.\n[712 B] (c ) Placing such reliance.\ntherefore.\nas is requisite on the testimony of the uncorroborated solitary witness for convicting the accused facing a murder charge is not possible in the case. [712 B]", + "1531": "Sub section (1) of section 24B of the Indian Income tax Act, 1922, provided that where a person dies his heirs and legal representatives ate liable to pay out of the estate of the deceased the tax assessed as payable by the deceased or any tax which would have been payable under the Art by the deceased if he had not died.\nA who, was one of the three partners in a firm of solicitors died.\non July 7,1949, and thereafter the partnership was carried on by the other two partners till December 1, 1949.\nwhen R, son of A, joined the firm as the third partner.\nAfter the death of A the arrangement between the various partners in regard to the ' realisations of the old out standings was that in respect of the work done up to the death of A the realisations were to be divided between A and the other two partners.\nThe firm 700 kept its accounts on cash basis For each of the five assessment years, 1950 1955, certain amounts were received by the heirs and legal representatives of A out of the out standings.\nProceedings were started by the Income tax Officer under section 34 of the Indian Income tax Act, 1922, in respect of the aforesaid.\nincome, and the various amounts were assessed to income tax in the hands of the respondents, the heirs and legal representatives of A, under section 34 (1) (b) read with section 24B of the Act, for the five respective assessment years, on the footing that the amounts which were received by the heirs and legal representatives of A after his death should be deemed by virtue of the words in sub section\n(1) of section 24B to be income received by A and liable to tax under that sub section.\nHeld, that the words \"or any tax which would have been payable by him under this Act if he had not died\" under section 24B(1) of the Indian Income tax Act, 1922, are restricted to the income received by the deceased person before his death and to the income received after his death by his heirs and legal representatives in the \"previous year\" and which had not been assessed but would have been assessed as income received by him, if death had not taken place.\nThe provisions of section 24B do not extend to tax liability of the estate of a deceased person beyond the previous or the account year in which that person dies.\nApart from section 24B no assessment can be made in respect of the income of a person after his death.\nHeld, that as the income was received after the expiry of the previous year in which A died it was not liable to be taxed as the income of A in the hands of his legal representatives in the several years of assessment.\nAllen vs Trehearne, , Ellis C Reid vs Commissioner of Income tax Bombay, and Wallace Brother & Co. Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income tax, Bombay City, [1948] 16 , referred to.", + "2609": "The Parliament enacted the Public Employment (Requirement as to Residence) Act, 1957 in pursuance of cl.\n(3) of article 16 of the Constitution of India making special provision for requirement as to residence in public employment.\nSection 3 of the Act gave the power to make rules in respect of certain classes of employment in certain areas, and accord ingly the Andhra Pradesh Public Employment (Requirement as to Residence) Rules were made prescribing the requirement , as to residence prior to appointment to certain posts, within the Telengana area of the State.\nThe petitioners who were non domicile persons appointed to the posts reserved for the domiciles of Telengana under the rules, were by an order relieved from their posts and employed in the other 'region of the State.\nThe petitioners, filed a petition under article 32 of the Constitution challenging the Act, the Rules and the order as ultra vires the Constitution.\nQuashing the order, this Court, HELD : Section 3 of the Public Employment (Requirement as to Residence) Act, 1957 in so far as it related to, Telengana and Rule 3 of other Rules under it were ultra vires the Constitution.\n[122 A] Clause (3) of article 16 of the Constitution enables Parliament to make a law in a special case prescribing any requirement as to residence within a State or Union Territory prior to appointment, in the State or Union Territory.\nThe provision speaks of a whole State as the venue for residential qualification and it is impossible to think that the Constituent Assembly was thinking of residence in Districts, Talukas, cities, towns or villages.\nThe fact that the clause is an exception and came as an amendment must dictate that a narrow construction upon the exception should be placed as indeed the debates in the Constituent Assembly also seem to, indicate.\nThe words 'any law ' and 'any requirement ' cannot be given wide and liberal construction.\nThese words are controlled by the words .\nresidence within the State or Union Territory ' which words mean what they say neither more or less.\n[121 D G] 116", + "1522": "The appellant, a postman, and I,is father were living in the same house.\nCertain undelivered postal articles were re covered from an almirah in the house, the key of which was produced by the father.\nThe appellant was tried and convicted of an offence under section 52 Post Offices Act for secreting postal articles.\nThe appellant contended that since it had not been proved that he had been entrusted with these articles the offence under section 52 was not made out and that lie could not be held guilty of secreting as he was not in exclusive possession of these articles.\nHeld, that entrustment was not an essential ingredient of the offence under section 52.\nWhere the legislature intended to make entrustment an ingredient of the offence it had used appropriate words to make it clear.\nIt had used no such words in section 52.\nTo secrete means to hide.\nIn a case like the present, the retention of an undelivered postal article in an almirah for an inordinately long period would be tantamount to hiding that article.\nHeld, further, that the appellant was not in exclusive possession of the postal articles and no inference could be drawn 409 that he had secreted them.\nAs the key was produced by the appellant 's father it could not be inferred that the appellant was in joint possession of the almirah much less that he was in exclusive possession of it.\nNo inference could be drawn from the fact that the almirah contained certain other articles belonging to the appellant as it also contained a large number of articles belonging to the father.", + "2392": "M, an accused person in certain proceedings pending before the Nyaya Panchayat filed a petition under article 227 in the High Court and obtained a stay of the proceedings on December 20, 1963 .\nThereafter when the Panchayat met to proceed with the matter, he made an application supported by a document purporting to be an affidavit stating that the High Court had admitted his writ petition and had stayed further proceedings before the Panchayat; and that therefore nothing further should be done in the matter.\nHowever, the, Panchayat did not allow his application and proceeded (to hold M and others guilty and imposing fines on them.\nM, thereafter filed an application under sections 4 and 5 of the , alleging contempt of the High Court by the Panchayat.\nAn affidavit filed before the High Court by the Sarpanch stated that the document filed by M, by way of an affidavit in support of his application had not been verified by any proper authority and for this and other reasons the Panchayat did not believe that the High Court had stayed the proceedings.\nThe High Court held the members of the Panchayat guilty of contempt and observed that if they wanted to ascertain the matter, they should have at best stayed the proceedings for a short while and asked the applicant to produce a certified copy of the stay order; in not doing so, the Panchas had obviously not acted bona fide and their action amounted to, wilful disobedience of the High Court 's order.\nOn appeal to this Court, HELD : The appeal must be allowed and the judgment and order of the High Court set aside.\nThe only material before the Panchayat was the application dated December 25.\n1963, which was not supported by 'any affidavit sworn to before a person authorised to administer oaths.\nFurther, the application did not contain the date of the order; even a copy of the telegram stated to have been sent by M 's advocate in the High Court was not attached to the application.\nOn this material the bona fides of the Panchas could not be doubted if they refused to accept the mere statement of the party that the High Court had stayed the proceedings before them.\nIn such matters those who assert that a person had knowledge of the order must prove this fact beyond all reasonable doubt.\nIf there is any doubt.\nthe benefit, ought to be given to the person charged with contempt of court.[120 F H; 121 A B] It is true that in certain cases proceedings can be adjourned to enable the parties to file better proof, but a judicial officer is not bound (to do so and, if the bona fide does not in his discretion adjourn proceedings, it cannot be said that he has committed contempt of court.\n[121 C D]", + "1378": "The appellant was tried for murder.\nThe facts established were that there were quarrels between the appellant and the deceased over the purchase of a cycle and in a play of cards that the appellant had purchased a sword a day earlier and that he had deposited the sword stained with human blood at the police station shortly after the murder.\nEvidence was also led of an extra judicial confession made by the appellant to one U but the High Court did not place reliance on it as it did not feel sure of it though it observed that a perusal of the statement of U showed that it was very likely that what he stated may have happened.\n^ Held, that the statement of U regarding the extra judicial confession was erroneously rejected by the High Court.\nExtra judicial confessions were not usually considered with favour but such a confession coming from a person who had no reason to state falsely and to whom it was made in circumstances which tended to support his statement could be relied upon.\nThe extra judicial confession in the present case was supported by the facts established, and these together fully established the guilt of the appellant.", + "4071": "On September 30, 1978 the Collector published the preliminary electoral roll under Rule 4(1) of the Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation (Preparation, Revision and Publication of Electoral Rolls and Selection of Councillors) Rules, 1963 for the purpose of holding elections in December, 1978 to the Municipal Corporation, and also issued a notice under the said rule inviting claims or objections to be filed within twenty days from the date of publication of the notice.\nA period of 30 days was however actually provided in the rule.\nThe final publication of the electoral roll was made on November 16, .1978.\nAfter November 25, 1978 a large number of nominations were received by the Returning officer arid the final list of candidates for the elections with their symbols was published on December 20, 1978 and the poll took place on December 31, 1978.\nThe appellants (Petitioners 1, 5 and 6) along with some others in their writ petition filed on December 28, 1978 contended that the entire election process had become vitiated on account of the defect in the notice issued by the Collector under Rule 4 (1) providing 20 days for preferring claims and objections while the rule prescribed 30 days and that by non compliance with this mandatory requirement, the entire election process held on the basis of the defective electoral roll, became a nullity and therefore the declaration of results of the successful candidates was liable to be quashed.\nThe High Court held that the appellants were not entitled to any relief as they had approached the Court after undue delay.\nDismissing the appeals this Court, ^ HELD: 1.\nIt is well settled that the power of the High Court under article 226 of the Constitution to issue an appropriate writ is discretionary and if the High Court finds that there is no satisfactory explanation for the inordinate delay, it may reject the petition if it finds that the issue of writ will lead to public inconvenience and interference with rights of others.\nThis rule applies also to a case in which the validity of an election to a local authority is challenged.\nThe question whether in a given case.\nthe delay involved .\nis such that it dissentients a person to relief .\nunder article 226 is a matter within the discretion of the High Court which as in all matters of 492 discretion has to exercise it judiciously and reasonably having regard to The surrounding circumstances.\n[497C D] 2.\nIf the appellants felt that the notice under Rule 4(3) suffered from any illegality, they could have brought it to the notice of the Collector immediately Thereafter.\nIt was open them to move the State Government under Rule 6 of the Rules to make an order directing the Collector to follow the provisions governing the preparation or the electoral roll.\nIt was also open to them to file a writ petition immediately after the publication of the said notice questioning its legality.\nNone of the above courses was adopted by the appellants.\nPersons whole claims were rejected could have filed an appeal under Rule 5 before the Collector.\nNo such appeal was presented.\n[495H 496B] 3.\nIt was only on December 5, 1978 for the first time a letter was addressed by one of the petitioners to the Collector drawing his attention to the error that had crept into the notice under Rule 4(1) of the Rules.\nBy that time, the nominations had all been received.\nThe final list of candidates for the election with their symbols was published on December 20, 1978.\nThe writ petition itself was filed on December 28, 1978 when the poll had to take place on December 31, 1978.\nNo satisfactory explanation was given in the course of the petition by the petitioners as to why they delayed the filing;, of the petition till December 28, 1978, even though they knew that there was an error in the notice issued under Rule 4(1).\n[496C E]", + "3168": "Section 220 of the , which corresponds to section 134 of the 1913 Act, provides that within thirty days after the balance sheet and profit and loss account, as the case may be, have been laid before the company at the general meeting.\nthree copies thereof shall be filed with the registrar and that failure to do so is punishable.\nThe respondent company and its directors were prosecuted for failure to file with the Registrar of Companies on or before 30th October 1967, the Balance sheet and profit and loss account of the company.\nBy 30th September, 1967, admittedly, no general body meeting had been held.\nThe High Court held that since no general body meeting was held, there could be no question of laying the balance sheet before the general body meeting and complying with the requirements of the section; and that, though the willful omission to call a general body meeting and of laying the balance sheet and profit and loss account before it may expose the persons responsible to punishment under other provisions of the Act, it would not make them liable either under section 134(4) of the 1913 Act or section 220 of the 1956 Act.\nDismissing the appeal to this Court, HELD : On principle and authority it should be held that no offence was committed under section 220 of the .\n[417B] (a) The principle accepted by this Court in State of Bombay vs Bandhan Ram Bhandani [1961] 1 S.C.R_ 801, that a company or its directors in a prosecution under sections 32 and 133 of the 1913 Act, could not, in defence to such prosecution, rely upon their own failure to call the general body meeting would not apply to a prosecution under section 134 of the 1913 Act or section 220 of the 1956 Act.\nUnlike sections 32 and 133, the responsibility of I sending to the Registrar the copies of the balance sheet and profit and loss account arises only after they have been laid before the company at the general meeting, the obligation to do so being completely dependent on its being laid before a general meeting.\n[414H 415E] (b) Where the words in the section are clear it is unnecessary to consider whether it embodies any principle and whether that principle is consistent with the principle as embodied in other sections which are differently worded.\nIn interpreting a penal provision it is not permissible to give an extended meaning to the plain words of the section on the ground of a principle recognised in certain other provisions.\n[415F G] (c) This is not a case where an accused person relies on his default and pleads his innocence.\nIn the , various stages have to be gone through before we reach the stage of a copy of the balance sheet and the profit and loss account being filed with the Registrar.\nThe failure to reach any one of the stages within the time prescribed is made penal by the Act.\nThe respondents may be guilty of any of those offences but not of the offence with which they were charged.\n[416E G] (d) Further a daily penalty is provided after the thirtieth day mentioned in section 220 (1) of the 1956 Act.\nWhen no general body meeting was held it is not possible to calculate the period of 30 days and there would be diffi culty in working Cut he daily penalty.\n[416C D)] 411 Dulal Chandra Bhar vs State of West Bengal, Gopal Khaitan vs State , Ramachandra & Sons (P) vs State, Ltd., A.I.R. India Nutriments Ltd. vs Registrar of Companies, 1934 34.\nCompanies Cases 160 P. section N. SAA.\nChettiar & Company vs Registrar of Companies, A.I.R. 1966 Madras 415, Registrar of Companies vs H. Mishra, A.I.R. 1969 Orissa 234, State vs Linkers Private Ltd. A.I.R. 1969 Patna 445 & (1970) 40 C.C. 17, Registrar of Companies vs Gopala Pillai & Ors.\n1951 K.L.J. 490 Debendra Nath Das Gupta vs Registrar of Joint Stock Companies, I.L.R. 1918 Calcutta 486, Ballev Dass vs Mohan Lal Sadhu, 1934 35 39 Calcutta Weekly Notes 1152 and Bhagirath vs Emperor, A.I.R. 1948, Calcutta 42 and re Cangipati Appayya, A.I.R. 1952 Madras 800, disapproved.\nImperator vs The Pioneer Clay and Industrial Works Ltd., I.L.R. , Vulcan Industries (P) Ltd. vs Registrar of Companies Orissa, I.L.R. (1972) Cuttack 373 and re Narasimha Rao, A.I.R. (1937) Madras 341, approved.", + "232": "The West Bengal Special Courts Act (X of 1950) was entitled \"An Act to provide for the speedier trial of cer tain offences,\" and the object of the Act.\nas declared in the preamble, was \"to provide for the speedier trial of certain offences\".\nSection 3 of the Act empowered the State Government by notification in the official gazette to con stitute Special Courts, and sec.\n5 provided that \"A Special Court shall try such offences or classes of offences or cases or classes of cases, as the State Government may by general or special order in writing, direct.\n\" The Act laid down a procedure for trial before Special Courts which was different in several respects from that laid down by the Criminal Procedure Code for trial of offences generally.\nThe respondent, who was convicted by a Special Court which tried his case under a notification issued by the Government under sec. 5, contended that the said section was unconsti tutional and void inasmuch as it contravened article 14 of the Constitution, which provides that \"the State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protec tion of the laws within the territory of India\".\n285 Held, per FAZL ALl, MAHAJAN, MUKHERJEA, CHANDRASEKHARA AIYAR and BOsE JJ.\n(PATANJALI SASTRI C.J., dissenting) Section 5 (1) of the West Bengal Special Courts Act, 1950, contravenes article 14 of the Constitution and is void inasmuch as (per FAZL ALl, MAHAJAN, MUKHERJEA, and CHANDRASEKHARA AIYAR JJ.) the procedure laid down by the Act for the trial by the Special Courts varied substantially from that laid down for the trial of offences generally by the Code of Criminal Procedure and the Act did not classify, or lay down any basis for classification, of the cases which may be directed to be tried by the Special Court, but left it to the uncontrolled discretion of the State Government to direct any case which it liked to be tried by the Special Court.\nDAs J. Section 5 Il) of the Act, in so far as it empowered the State Government to direct \"offences\" or \"classes of offences\" or \"classes of cases\" to be tried by a Special Court, does not confer an uncontrolled and unguided power on the State Government but by necessary implication contemplates a proper classification and is not void.\nThat part of the section which empowered the Government to direct \"cases\" as distinct from \"classes of cases\" to be tried by a Special Court is void.\nPATANJALI SASTRI C.J. Section 5 (1) of the Act is not void or unconstitutional wholly or even in part.\nPer FAZL ALl, MAHAJAN, MUKHERJEA and CHANDRASEKHARA AIYAR JJ.\nA rule of procedure laid down by law comes as much within the purview of article 14 of the Constitution as any rule of substantive law and it is necessary that all litigants, who are similarly situated, are able to avail themselves of the same procedural rights for rebel and for defence with like protection and without discrimination.\n(ii) If it is established that the person complaining has been discriminated against as a result of legislation and denied equal privileges with others occupying the same position, it is not incumbent upon him before he can claim relief on the basis of fundamental rights to assert and prove that, in making the law, the legislature was actuated by a hostile or inimical intention against a particular person or class ; nor would the operation of article 14 be excluded merely because it is proved that the legislature had no intention to discriminate, though discrimination was the necessary consequence of the Act.\nThe question of intention may arise in ascertaining whether an officer acted mala fide or not; but it cannot arise when discrimination follows or arises on the express terms of the law itself.\n(iii) The language of sec.\n5 (1) clearly and unambigu ously vests the State Government with unrestricted discre tion to direct any cases or class of cases to be tried by the Special Court, not a discretion to refer cases only when it is of opinion that a speedier trial is necessary 286 (iv) Assuming that the preamble throws any light on the section, the necessity of speedier trial is too vague, uncertain and elusive a criterion to form a rational basis for discrimination.\n(v) It cannot be said that an Act does not contravene the equality rule laid down by article 14 simply because it confers unregulated discretion on officers or administrative bodies.\nThe true position is that if the statute itself is not discriminatory the charge of Violation of the article may be only against the official who administers it, but if the statute itself makes a discrimination without any proper or reasonable basis, it would be void for being in conflict with article 14.\n(vi) The notification issued under the Act in the present case would also come within the definition of law and could be impeached apart from the Act if it violates article 14.\nDAS J. (1) Article 14 does not insist that every piece of legislation must have universal application and it does not take away from the State the power to classify persons for the purposes of legislation, but the classification must be rational, and in order to satisfy this test (i) the classification must be founded on an intelligible differen tia which distinguished those that are grouped together from others, and (ii) that differentia must have a rational relation to the object sought to be achieved by the Act.\nThe differentia which is the basis of the classification and the object of the Act are distinct things and what is necessary is that there must be a nexus between them.\nBut the mere fact that the inequality has not been made with the special intention of prejudicing a particular person or persons but in the general interest of administration will not validate a law if in fact it results in inequality of treatment.\nNor can the constitutionality of a statute depend on the degree of the inequality brought about by the law.\n(2) Although the preamble to an Act cannot override the plain meaning of its operative parts, it may nevertheless assist in ascertaining what the true meaning or implication of a particular section is; and the part of sec.\n5 ( 1 ) of the Act which relates to \"offences ' ', \"Classes of offences\" and \"classes of cases\", construed in the light of the pream ble, does not confer an uncontrolled and unguided power on the State Government, but by necessary implication and intendment empowers the State to classify the offences or classes of offences or classes of cases, that is to say, to make a proper classification having a relation to the object of the Act as recited in the preamble; and this part of sec.\n5 (1) foes not therefore contravene article 14.\n(3) That part of sec.\n5(1) which empowers the State Government to direct \"cases\" as distinct from \"classes of cases\" to be cried by the Special Court lies beyond the ambit of the object aid down by the preamble and contem plates and involves a purely arbitrary selection based on nothing more substantial 287 than the whim and pleasure of the State Government without any appreciable relation to the necessity for a speedier trial and therefore offends against the provisions of article 14 and is void.\nBose J.\nThe test under article 14 is neither classifica tion nor whether there is absolute equality in any academi cal sense of the term but whether the collective conscience of a sovereign democratic republic as reflected in the views of fair minded, reasonable, unbiassed men, who are not swayed by emotion or prejudice, can consider the impugned laws as reasonable, just and fair and regard them as that equal treatment and protection in the defence of liberties which is expected of a sovereign democratic republic in the conditions which obtain in India to day.\nPATANJALI SASTRI C.J. (dissenting).\nSection 5 (1) of the impugned Act is not void or unconstitutional wholly or even in part because: (1)The words in the enacting part of a statute must be confined to that which is the plain object and general intention of the legislature in passing the Act and the preamble affords a good clue to discover what that object was.\nThe title and the preamble of the Act in the present case show unmistakably that the whole object and purpose of the Act was to devise machinery for the speedier trial of certain offences.\nThe discretion intended to be exercised by the State Government must be exercised bona fide on a consideration of the special features or circum stances which call for comparatively prompt disposal of a case or cases proposed to be referred and sec.\n5 (11 must be read as empowering the Government to direct the Special Court to try such offences or classes of offences or cases or classes of cases as in its judgment, require speedier trial.\n(2) Article 14 of the Constitution does not mean that all laws must be general in character and universal in application.\nThe State must possess the power of distin guishing and classifying persons or things to be subjected to particular laws and in making a classification the legis lature must be allowed a wide latitude of discretion and judgment.\nThe classification is justified if it is not palpably arbitrary but is founded on a reasonable basis having regard to the object to be attained.\nThe powers of the legislature must include the power of entrusting an administrative body With a plenary but not arbitrary discre tion to be exercised so as to carry out the purpose of the Act and the mere fact that the discretion might be exercised arbitrarily by the administrative body cannot make the law itself unconstitutional.\n(4)The impugned Act does not in terms or by implication discriminate between persons or classes of persons nor does it purport to deny to any one equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws.\n(5) Even from the point of view of reasonable classification the expediency of speedier trial is not too vague or indefi nite to be the basis of classification.\n(6) The notifica tion of the Government in the present case referring the case to the Special Court did not contravene article 14 and is not void inasmuch as there is nothing 288 to show that the Government was influenced by any discrimi natory motive or design or acted arbitrarily, but on the other hand there are obviously special features which mark off the group of cases referred as requiring speedier dis posal.\nJudgment of the Calcutta High Court affirmed.\nRomesh Tappar vs The Stale of Madras ([1950] S.C.R. 594), Chintaman Rao vs State of Madhya Pradesh ([1950] S.C.R. 759), Dr. Khare 's Case ([1950] S.C.R. 519), Chiranjit Lal vs Union of India and Others ([1950] S.C R. 869) and Slate of Bombay vs\nF.N. Balsara ([1951] S.C.R. 682), ex plained.\nTruax vs Corrigan ; , Yick Wo vs Hopkins and other American cases on the right to equal protection of the laws considered.", + "4568": "In pursuance of r. 7A(1)(b) of the Central Health Service Rules, 1963 as amended by the Central Health Service (Amendment) Rules.\n1966 and all other powers enabling in that behalf, the President of India issued a notification dated.\nJune 8,1967 making the substantive appointment of the appellant Dr. Asim Kumar Bose as Radiologist, Irwin Hospital, New Delhi.\nBy virtue of his post as Radiologist cum Associate Professor of Radiology, the appellant was teaching the under graduate and post graduate students as an Associate Professor of Radiology of the Maulana Azad Medical College for the M.D., M.S., D.M.R.T.\nAnd M B.B.S. courses of studies of the Delhi University.\nIn 1973 the Central Government promoted Dr. K.P. Mittal, Lecturer in Radiology in the Maulana Azad Medical College as Associate Professor of Radiotherapy ignoring the claim of the appellant who thereupon made a representation.\nThe Government of India, Ministry of Health & family Planning Department of Health by its letter dated February 23, 1974 rejected the representation holding that the appellant could not be considered for appointment to the post of Associate Professor of Radiotherapy in the Maulana Azad Medical College inasmuch as he did not possess at least five years ' teaching experience as Reader/Assistant Professor in the concerned speciality as required under r. 8(2A) and paragraph 3 of Annexure I to the Second Schedule of the 1966 Rules.\nThe appellant filed a writ petition in the Delhi High Court challenging the impugned order, but the High Court rejected the writ petition holding that the requirement rules required that the requisite teaching experience must be the experience gained while working in a medical college or in a teaching institution i.e. as a Teacher in a teaching department.\nAllowing the appeal.\n^ HELD: (1) There was a failure on the part of the Government of India in the Ministry of Health to draw a distinction between teaching and non 17 teaching hospitals under the Central Health Service.\nThe Irwin Hospital and the G.B. Pant Hospital are the two associate hospitals of the Maulana Azad Medical College and the teaching in the medical college is undertaken by Professors and Associate Professors as well as by the Specialists attached to the two hospitals affiliated to the College.\nThus the teaching experience gained by the appellant while holding the post of Radiologist cum Associate Professor of Radiology (ex officio) had to be taken into consideration to determine his eligibility for appointment as Professor or Associate Professor of the concerned speciality.\n[35 G H, 36 A C, 43 F G] (2) On a construction of r. 8(2) and paragraph 2(b) of Annexure 1 to the Second Schedule of the 1966 Rules, it was held that the appellant possessed the qualifications and experience requisite for appointment to the post of Professor of Radiotherapy in the Maulana Azad Medical College which is a post belonging to Specialist Grade I equivalent to Supertime Grade II carrying a pay scale of Rs. 1800 2250, which had fallen vacant during the pendency of the appeal.\nThe Union Public Service Commission must therefore re advertise the post of Professor and call the appellant for an interview for being considered for appointment to the post.\n[38 C D, F H] (3) The action of the Central Government in the Ministry of Health ignoring the claim of the appellant for appointment to the post of Associate Professor of Radiotherapy in the Maulana Azad Medical College in 1973 was based on a misconstruction of r. B(2A) and paragraph 3 of Annexure I to the Second Schedule.\nThe word \"as\" in these provisions must, in the context in which it appears, be interpreted to mean \"in the capacity of\".\nThese provisions must be interpreted in a broad and liberal sense as it would otherwise work great injustice of persons in Specialists Grade II like the appellant who, while holding a non clinical post in a teaching hospital like the Irwin Hospital, has actually been teaching the students of the Maulana Azad Medical College to which it is affiliated.\nThe Ministry of Health cannot be heard to say that the appellant had not acquired the status of an Associate Professor of Radiology with effect from October 9, 1964, particularly when the Central Government have been utilizing his services as such for teaching the post graduate and under graduate students of the Maulana Azad Medical College for the M.D., M.S., D.M.R.T. and M.B.B.S. courses of studies for the last 17 years.\nThe arrangement has continued for all these years with the approval of the Delhi University which has conferred the designation of Associate Professor of Radiology on the appellant presumably with the tacit sanction of the Medical Council of India.\n[37 F G, 38 A B, 42 D F] (4) The recruitment rules nowhere provide that the teaching experience gained by a Specialist in a teaching hospital in the capacity of an Associate Professor (ex officio) shall not count towards the requisite teaching experience for purposes of sub rs.\n(2) and (2A) of r. 8 and paragraph 2 (b) and 3 of Annexure I to the Second Schedule of the 1966 Rules.\nThere is no provision made in the Rules that the teaching experience must be gained on a regular appointment.\nThere is hardly any difference so far as teaching experience is concerned whether it is acquired on regular appointment or as a Specialist in a teaching hospital with the ex officio designation.\nAs the statutory rules do not 18 provide that the teaching experience gained in an ex officio capacity shall not count towards the requisite teaching experience, the teaching experience gained by the appellant while holding the post of Radiologist cum Associate Professor of Radiology (ex officio) in the Irwin Hospital can not be ignored in determining his eligibility for appointment as Professor or Associate Professor of the concerned speciality.\n[35 C E]", + "2440": "An industrial dispute regarding fixation of wages and bonus, between the respondent paper mills and its workmen, the appellants, was referred to the Industrial Tribunal in October, 1962, and the reference included a dispute about bonus payable for the years 1962 63 and 1963 64.\nThe Tribunal held: (1 ) that there were in the region no ' other concerns in the same line of business which could be compared with the respondent but that there were three collieries, a steel plant, a cement factory and an aluminum company in the region which were comparable with the resportdent, that as the minimum wage in those industries which was about Rs. 95 was above that of the respondent, a revision of the minimum wage in the respondent mills was justified.\nthat such minimum wage should be fixed for the price index prevailing at the time of the award taking 100 as the basic index for the year 1939, and that on that basis, the basic wage and dearness allowance should be Pa. 73, and that Pa. 11 was payable as production bonus; (2) that the dearness allowance element need not be linked to the price index, but that wage should be fixed at the prevailing price index leaving it to the workmen to ask for increase in minimum wage on any further rise in price index; (3 ) that the revised wages were payable with effect from 13th December, 1962; (4) that the three elements of basic wage, dearness allowance, and production bonus which make up the total minimum wage packet of Rs. 84 (Rs. 73 + Pa. 11) should be in the proportion of 3: 3: 1, and that profit bonus was payable at three months ' basic wage.\nThe proportion of 3:3: 1 was fixed by the Tribunal, because, under an agreement of 1959 the management and workmen accepted that proportion by mutual consent.\nOn the basis of that agreement, the Tribunal also held that; (5) casual workers should not be equated to permanent workers for purpose of minimum wages, and that casual and radii workers should not be allowed bonus on the same basis as the permanent workers; (6) The appellants also claimed before the Tribunal 6 months ' basic wage instead of 3 months ' basic wage, which was being paid by the respondent, on the assumption that certain before staff were being paid as bonus 3 months ' consolidated wage consisting of basic wage and dearness allowance; but the Tribunal rejected the claim.\nIn appeal to this Court.\nHELD: (1) This Court laid down in French Motor Car Co. Ltd. vs Its Workmen, [1963] Supp.\nthat where there is no concern in the same industry in the region comparable with the concern in which wages have to be fixed, greater emphasis should be laid on the region part of the industry cum region principle.\nTo give full effect to this rule the Tribunal should have proceeded to fix the minimum wage in the respondent mills on the basis of the average minimum wage prevailing 667 in the other industries in that region.\nThe respondent was not providing any amenities which should be taken into account in fixing the minimum wage, different from the amenities provided by those concerns in the region which were being compared.\nTherefore, the Tribunal should have fixed the minimum wage packet at Rs. 95 per mensem which was the average wage prevailing in all those concerns and should not have fixed the wages on an entirely different basis.\n[671 F H; 672 G H] (2) The Industrial, Tribunal has the discretion, in appropriate cases, of making a direction linking the dearness allowance element of a wage to the price index, or to fix the wage at the prevailing price index leaving the labour to raise a fresh demand and, if necessary, a fresh industrial dispute for further rise in wages, in case there is marked variation in price index and the wage fixed becomes outdated; and therefore.\nthe Tribunal was not wrong in choosing the latter alternative.\n[674 F G; 675 B] Hydra (Engineers), vs The Workmen, ; , referred (3) This direction ' was objected to by respondents, on the ground that the respondent may have to pay arrears for 5 or 6 years which would be a heavy burden.\nBut the previous agreement of 1959 was binding only upto 12th December, 1962.\nSo, the Tribunal was right in directing that the revised wages should take effect from 13th December, 1962, in view of the considerable rise in the price index and the fact that the labour had not raised a fresh dispute for a further revision of wages since the date of the award.\n[675 G H] (4) No error was committed by the Tribunal in the break up of the wages into the 3 elements of basic wage, dearness allowance and production bonus in the proportion of 3: 3: 1.\nThe contention of the workmen that the proportion should be 3:1: 1: so as to increase the basic wage element and consequently the profit bonus.\nwas rightly rejected by the Tribunal, because.\nthe proportion of 3:3:1 was accepted by mutual consent.\n[674 B C] (5) The distinction between casual workers and permanent workers for purpose of minimum wage, and casual and badli workers on the hand and permanent workers on the other for purpose of bonus, was recognised by the parties themselves in the agreement of 1959, and therefore, the Tribunal was right in keeping up the distinction in its award.\n[675 D E; 678 B C] (6) The allegation that some clerical staff was receiving what amounted to 6 months ' basic wage as bonus was incorrect.\nThere was some clerical staff which did not get any dearness allowance and the bonus in their case was worked out on the basis of their wages which was only the basic wage.\nThe appellants were wrong in assuming that the wage of such clerical staff was a consolidated wage consisting of the 2 elements of basic wage and dearness allowance.\nTherefore, the appellants could not claim 3 months ' consolidated wages as bonus which would amount to 6 months ' basic wage.\n[677 G H; 678 A B] It could not be urged by the appellants that calculation of available.\nsurplus for purposes of bonus should have been on the basis of the Full Bench formula approved by this Court in Associated Cement Companies Ltd. vs Its Workmen, , for justifying 6 months ' basic wages as bonus, because, that was not the basis of the claim before the Tribunal.\nFurther, the Tribunal was expected to decide the dispute only as referred to it, and at the time of the reference the accounts for the years 1962 63 and 1963 64 could not have been available, and therefore, 668 there could not possibly be a claim for higher bonus on the basis of the application of the Full Bench Formula.\n[676 D F; 677 C D]", + "2913": "The appellant, a partnership firm, filed its return of income for the assessment year i960 61 and subsequently produced before the Incometax Officer its relevant books of accounts and papers.\nIt also produced before him the statement showing various creditors from whom it had borrowed on Hundis during the accounting year in question, giving full names and addresses of the alleged creditors.\nAfter enquiry the Incometax Officer made an assessment.\nOn June 3, 1966 the Income tax Officer issued to the appellant a notice under section 148 of the Income tax Act, 1961.\nThe notice was issued after four years but before 8 years of the end of the original assessment year.\nThe appellant challenged the validity of the notice as well as the proceedings taken on the strength of that notice in a writ petition under articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution.\nThe High Court dismissed the petition.\nBy special leave appeal was filed in this Court.\nOn direction given by the Court the report submitted by the Income tax Officer to the Commissioner and the Commissioner 's order thereon were produced.\nIn the report it was said that it appeared that the alleged creditors of the appellant were name lenders and transactions were bogus; hence proper investigation regarding those loans was necessary.\nQuestion No. 8 on the report was whether the Commissioner was satisfied that the case was fit for the issue of notice under section 148.\nAgainst this the commissioner had noted 'yes '.\nOn these facts this Court, HELD : Under section 148 and section 151(2) the Income tax Officer Must record his reasons for issuing the notice under section 148.\nThere must be prima facie grounds for taking action under section 148 Further before issuing such a notice the provisions of cis.\n(a) and (b) of section 147 must be satisfied.\n[447 B, E] In this case the Income tax Officer appears to have had a vague feeling that the transactions were bogus and that the alleged creditors were only name lenders.\nAccording to him proper investigation regarding the loans was necessary.\nThat is not the same thing as saying that there ,are reasons to issue notice under section 148.\n[447 A C] In these circumstances it could not be held that the Income tax Officer had any material before him which could satisfy the requirements of either cl.\n(a) or cl.\n(b) of section 147.\nTherefore he could not have issued a notice under section 148.\nFurther the report submitted by him under section 151(2) did not mention any reason for coming to the conclusion that it was a fit case for the issue of the notice under section 148.\nThe Commissioner also mechanically accorded permission.\nThus the important safeguards provided in sections 147 and 151 were lightly treated by the income tax Officer as well as by the Commissioner.\n[447 F 448 B] The appeal must accordingly be allowed.", + "1697": "By section 25 (4) of the Income tax Act, \"Where the person who was at the commencement of the Indian Income tax (Amendment) Act, 1939.\ncarrying on any business, profession or vocation in which tax was at any time charged under the provisions of the Indian Income tax Act, 1918, is succeeded in such capacity by another person, the change not being merely a change in the constitution of a partnership, no tax shall be payable by the first mentioned person in respect of the income, profits and gains of the period between the end of the previous year and the date of such succession.\" A firm bearing the same name as the appellant firm, had been carrying on business from before 1918 and had paid tax on that business under the Income tax Act, 1918.\nThe firm did three kinds of businesses, namely, (a) in piece goods, yam as general merchants, 92 (b) in the manufacture and sale of umbrellas and (c) in the manufacture and sale of soaps.\nThere were various changes in the constitution of the firm between 1918 and 1934.\nIn May 1939 two, documents were executed, one by the then members of the firm, and a stranger H. being exhibit CI and the other by those members alone,.\nbeing exhibit CII.\nIt appeared from exhibit CI that the business in the manufacture and sale of umbrellas and soaps was being carried on from October November 1937 by the parties to it as partners while exhibit CII showed that the parties to it had been carrying on the business in yarn piecegoods and as general merchants as partners from the same time as mentioned in exhibit Cl.\nOn October 30.\n1943 a document styled as an agreement of partnership was executed by five persons who were then the persons interested in the businesses carried on under the instrument of May 30, 1939.\nThis document referred to the two, agreements of partnership of May 30, 1939 and certain subsequent retirements of partners and admissions of new partners and provided that the businesses previously carried on by the two partnerships.\nreferred to in the instruments of May 30, 1939, would thereafter be carried on by one single partnership constituted by the parties to it.\nThereafter all the businesses aforesaid were carried on by this single partnership.\nThe firm constituted by the instrument of October 30, 1943 continued with certain changes in its constitution till February 7, 1948 when the then partners of, it entered into an agreement with a company to transfer the business of the firm to the latter, the transfer to be completed by February 13, 1948 and the transfer was in fact made.\nThe firm constituted by the document of October 30, 1943 claimed relief under section 25(4) in assessment for the years 1948 49 and 1949 50 on the ground that it had been carrying on a business on April 1, 1939 when the Income tax (Amendment) Act, 1939 commenced; to operate on which business tax had been charged under the Act of 1918 and that it was succeeded in that business by a company in February 1948.\nHeld: (per Sarkar and Shah JJ.).\nThe assessee was not entitled to the relief.\nCl and CII showed that the business that had been carried on by the firm existing in 1918 was discontinued in October/November 1937 and its businesses were split up into two and from then carried on by two independent partnerships brought into existence by those documents.\nThe old firm was brought to an end by Exs.\nCl and CII.\nWhen a business carried on in one unit is disintegrated and divided into parts, the parts are not the whole, though all the parts taken together constitute the whole.\nIn such case there is a discontinuance of the original businesses.\nsection N. A. section A. Annamalai, Chettiar vs Commissioner of Income tax, Madras, referred to.\n93 The business on which tax had been charged under the Act of 1918 was not being carried on April 1, 1939 by the firm which had paid tax under that Act.\nThe business to which the company succeeded under the agreement ,of February 7, 1948 cannot before the succession be said to have been carried on by a firm which was carrying on business on April 1, 1939, for that firm had been newly formed under the instrument of ,October 30, 1943, which expressly revoked the partnership agreements of May 30, 1939 under which two firms had been brought into brought into existence.\nPer, Hidayatullah J. (dissenting) (i) Sub sections\n(3) and (4) of section 25 ,of the Act are mutually exclusive . sub section\n(3) was only applicable when the business was discontinued and that in the term \"succession\" was not to be included a change in the constitution of the partnership.\nIn sub section\n(4) the emphasis is on succession to a person who on April 1, 1939 was carrying on any business on which tax was at any time ,charged under the Act 1918.\nIn sub section\n(3) the emphasis is on the discontinuance of the business which had paid tax under the Act 1918.\n(ii) There is difference of approach to the same facts under the law of partnership and the Income tax law.\nCharandas vs Haridas, (1960)39 and Dulichand vs ,Commissioner of Income tax, Nagpur, [1956] S.C.R. 154, referred to.\n(iii) Discontinuance of a firm is not a mere change in the constitution of the firm or even succession where, though the business changes hands, the original business which paid the tax in 1918 is carried on.\nShivram Poddar vs Income tax, Officer, C. A. No. 455 of 1963 dated December 13, 1963, referred to.\n(iv) All cases of discontinuance of businesses are treated under sub section\n(3) and all cases of succession under sub section\n(4) and all cases of mere change in the constitution of the firm are neither cases under sub section\n(3) nor under sub section\nThese sub sections do not apply to cases where the business was not in existence before the Act 1922 came into force.\nAmbalal Himatlal vs Commissioner of Income tax and Excess Profits Tax, Bombay North, , referred to.\n(v) Since the soap and umbrella businesses were not in existence and no relief could be claimed in respect of these businesses, changes in respect of them were irrelevant.\n(vi) by the expression \"discontinued\" in sub section\n(3) is meant complete cessation of business.\nIn the present case it could be said that this had taken place in respect of the piece goods business; this might 94 have been managed by persons other than those who had paid the tax under the 1918 Act, but the business was not discontinued for the application of sub section\nCommissioner of Income tax, Bombay vs P. E. Polson, (1945)13 Commissioner of Income tax, West Bengal vs A. W. Figgies and Co. ; and Mevoppar vs Commissioner of Income tax, Madras, 1.\nL. R. referred to.\n(vii) In the present case there was no succession and it falls within the rule laid down by this Court in Figgies ' case.\n(viii) Though a firm was to be regarded as an entity for the purpose of the Income tax Act, that entity was not to be taken to be disturbed by the coming in or going out of partners.\nApplying the test to the present case it was held that the identity of the entity was never lost and there was never a succession till the year 1948.\nNo question of the dissolution of the old firm in piece goods business ever arose.\nIt continued right through, even other newly started businesses were owned by it.\nIt cannot be said that the old firm had either discontinued or had been succeeded by another person.\nHemchand was a mere employee though described as a partner.\nThe entry of Hemehand did not constitute a dissolution of the old firm.\nCommissioner of Income tax, Bombay City vs Kolhia Hirdagarh, Co. Ltd., Bombay, (1949) 17 ; and Commissioner of Income tax, Bombay City vs Sir Homi Metters Executor, , referred to.\n(ix) The appellants are entitled to succeed in their claim regarding the business in piece goods yarn and banking which alone had paid tax under the 1918 Act.", + "3844": "Khandappa Sangappa Magdum died on June 27, 1960 leaving behind, his widow Hirabai, two sons Gurupad and Shivapad and three daughters.\nOn November, 6, 1952 Hirabai filed special civil suit No. 26/53 for partition and separate possession of a 7/24 share in two houses, a land, two shops and mov ables on the basis that these properties belonged to the joint family consisting of her husband, and their two sons.\nThe case of the plaintiff was that if a partition were to take place during Khandappa 's life time between himself and his two sons the plaintiff would have got a 1/4th share each on the death of Khandappa, Her further case was that Khandappa 's 1/4th share could devolve upon his death on six sharers, entitling her to 1/24th share besides.\nThe trial Court found that the suit properties belonged to the joint family and that there was no prior partition.\nFollowing the judgment of the Bombay High Court in Shiramabai Bhimgonda vs Kalgonda , limited her share to only 1/24th and refused to add 1/4th and 1/24th together.\nDismissing the defendant 's appeal 524/66 and allowing the cross objections of the plaintiff, the Bombay High Court, by its judgment dated March 19, 1975 following 68 Rom.\nL.R. 74 which overruled , held that the plaintiff wag entitled to 7/24th share.\nDismissing the appeal by special leave, the Court.\nHELD : 1. (a) What Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act.\n1956 deals with is the devolution of the interest which a male Hindu has in a Mitakshara property at the time of his death.\nThe proviso to Section 6 contains a formula, for fixing the share of the claimants while Explanation I contains a formula for deducing the share of the deceased.\n[765 H, 766 A B] (b) Explanation I which contains the formula for determining the share of the deceased creates a fiction by providing that the interest of a Hindu Mitakshara coparcener shall be deemed to be, the share in the property that would have been allotted to him if a partition of the property had taken place immediately before his death.\nWhether a partition had actually taken place between the plaintiffs husband and his sons is beside the point for the purposes of Explanation 1.\nThat Explanation compels the assumption of a fiction that in fact \"a partition of the property had taken place\", the point of time of the partition being the one immediately before the death of the person in whose property the heirs claim a share.\nThe fiction created by Explanation I has to be given its due and full effect.\n[766 E F, 767 C D] Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi vs section Teja Singh, ; applied.\nEast End Dwellings Co. Ltd. vs Finsbury Borough Council, 132, quoted with approval 2.\n(a) In order to ascertain the share of heirs in the property of a deceased coparcener it is necessary in the very nature of things, and as they Very first step to ascertain the share of the deceased in the coparcenary property , by dong that alone can one determine the extent of the claimant 's share.\nExplanation 1 to section 6 resorts to the simple expedient, undoubtedly factional, that.\n14 315SCI/78 762 the interest of a Hindu Mitakshara coparcener \"shall be deemed to be the share in the property that would have been allotted to him if a partition of that property had taken place immediately before his death.\nWhat is therefore required to be assumed is that a partition had in fact taken place between the deemed and his coparceners immediately before his death.\nThat assumption, once made, is irrevocable.\nIn other words, the assumption having been made once for the purpose of ascertaining the share of the deceased in the coparcenary property, one cannot go back on that assumption and ascertain the share of the heirs without reference, to it.\nThe assumption which the statute requires to be made that a partition had in fact taken place must permeate the entire process of ascertainment of the ultimate share of the heirs, through all its stages.\nTo make the assumption at the initial stage for the limited purpose of ascertaining the share of the deceased and then to ignore it for calculating the quantum of the share of the heirs is truly to permit one 's imagination to boggle.\nAll the consequences which flow from a real partition have to be logically worked out, which means that the share of the heirs must be ascertained on the basis that they had separated from one another and had received a share in the partition which had taken place during the life time of the deceased.\nThe allotment of this share is not a processual step devised merely for the purpose of working out some other conclusion.\nit has to be treated and accepted as a concrete reality, something that cannot be recalled just as a share allotted to a coparcener in an actual partition cannot generally be recalled.\nThe inevitable corollary of this position is that the heir will get his or her share in the interest which the deceased had in the coparcenary property at the time of his death, in addition to the share which he or she received or must be deemed to have received in the notional partition.\n[768 B G] (b) Ibis interpretation furthers the legislative intent in regard to the enlargement of the share of female heirs, qualitatively and quantatively.\nEven assuming that two interpretations of Explanation 1 are reasonably possible, Courts must prefer that interpretation which will further the intention of the legislature and remedy the injustice from which the Hindu women have suffered over the years.\nBy restricting the operation of the fiction created by Explana tion I in the manner suggested by the appellant, Courts, shall be taking a retrograde step, putting back as it were the clock of social reform which has enabled the Hindu women to acquire an equal status with males in matters of pro perty.\n[768 G, 769 A B] Rangubhai Lalji vs Laxman Lalji, 68 (Bom) L.R. 74; Sushilabai Ramachandra Kulkarni v, Narayanarao Gopalrao Deshpande and Ors., A.I.R. (1975) Bom.\n257; Vidyaben vs Jagadishchandra N. Bhatt, A.I.R. 1974 Guj. 23; Ananda vs Haribandu, A.I.R. 1967 Orissa 194; approved.\nIn the instant case, (a) There is no justification for limiting the plaintiff 's share to 1/24th by ignoring the 1/4th share which she would have obtained had there been a partition during her husband 's life time between him and his two sons.\nIn a partition between Khandappa and his two sons, there would be four sharers in the coparcenary property, the fourth being Khandappa 's wife, the plaintiff.\nKhandappa would have therefore got a 1/4th share in the coparcenary property on the hypothesis of a partition between himself and his sons.\n[766 G H, 767 B C] (b) By the application of the normal rule prescribed by Section 6 of the , Khandappa 's interest in the coparcenary property would devolve by survivorship upon the surviving members of the coparcenary and not in accordance with the provisions of the Act.\nBut, since the widow and daughter are amongst the female relatives specified in class I of the Schedule to the Act and Khandappa died leaving behind a widow and daughters, ,he proviso to section 6 comes into play and the normal rule is excluded.\nKhandappa 's interest in the coparcenary property would therefore devolve, according to the proviso, by intestate succession under the Act and not by survivorship.\nTestamentary succession is out of question as the deceased had not made a testamentary disposition though, under the explanation to section 763 30 of the Act, the interest of a male Hindu in Mitakshara coparcenary.\nproperty is capable of being disposed of by a will or other testamentary disposition.\n[765 E G] (c) The plaintiff 's share as determined by the application of the rules of intestate succession contained in Sections 8, 9 and 10 of the Hindu Succession .\nAct will be 1/6th.\nThe deceased Khandappa died leaving behind him two sons, three daughters and a widow.\nThe son, daughter.\nand widow are mentioned as heirs in class I of the Schedule and therefore, by reason of the provisions of section 8(a) read with the 1st clause of section 9, they take simultaneously and to the exclusion of other heirs.\nAs between them the two son 's, the three daughters and the widow will take equally.\neach having one share in the deceased 's property under section 10 read with Rules 1 and 2 of that section.\n[766 C D]", + "5364": "The Life Insurance Corporation was established on Sep tember 1, 1956 under the Life Insurance Act of 1956 (Act 31 of 1956) by amalgamating about 200 insurers carrying on life insurance business in the country.\nIt had no employees of its own to carry on the vast business which had been taken over and the nature of the work was such that the Corpora tion required the services of employees with experience and expertise in running life insurance business.\nIn order to meet the above need, Section 11 of the Act came to be enact ed.\nSub section (1) provided that with effect from September 1, 1956, every whole time employee of the erstwhile insurers would become an employee of the Corporation and hold office therein by the same tenure, at the same remuneration, and upon the same terms and conditions and with the same rights and privileges as to pension and gratuity and other matters as he would have held on September 1, 1956, had the Act not been passed.\nThe conditions of service of the employees whose serv ices were transferred to the Corporation under Section 11(1) were not uniform.\nThe conditions governing the retirement of those employees were also diverse and different.\nIn some cases the age of retirement had been fixed at 55 years, in some at 58 years and in some others at 60 years.\nIn many cases, the insurers had permitted their employees to contin ue in 181 their services even beyond 60 years depending upon their efficiency and physical capacity.\nFor the purposes of rationalising the pay scales of the transferred employees, under sub section (2) of Section 11 the Central Government was empowered to alter the terms of service of the employees as to their remuneration in such manner as it thought fit.\nThe sub section was amended by Acts 17 and 36 01 ' 1957.\nClause (bb) of sub section (2) 01 ' Section 49 conferred power on the Corporation to make regulations with the previ ous approval of the Central Government as regards 'the terms and conditions of service of persons who had become employ ees of the Corporation under subsection (1) 01 ' Section 11 '.\nUnder clauses (b) and (bb) of Section 49(2) 01 ' the Act, Regulations were framed prescribing the ages of retirement of the employees of the Corporation belonging to different categories with the previous approval of the Central Govern ment and were incorporated in the Life Insurance Corporation of India (Staff) Regulations, 1960 made by the Corporation which came into effect on July, 1960.\nUnder Regulation 19(1), all transferred employees were entitled to remain in service till they completed 60 years of age but the appointing authority was empowered to retire any such transferred employee on completion of 55 years of age or at any time thereafter, if his efficiency was found to have been impaired.\nUnder Regulation 19(2) employees appointed to the service of the Corporation on or after September, 1956, were required to retire on completion of 58 years of age but the appointing authority was empowered to retire any such employee on completion of 55 years of age or thereafter if his efficiency was found to have been im paired.\nIn the case of the transferred employees this regulation was made in conformity with the 'standardisation order ' passed in respect of Class III and Class IV transferred employees.\nin whose case the age of retirement was fixed at 60 years.\nThe result was that the regulation made a clear and distinct classification 01 ' all the employees of the Corporation belonging to all classes into two groups transferred employees and the employees appointed after September 1, 1956 for purposes of the age of retire ment having regard to the historical reasons.\n182 Consequent upon the settlement arrived at, upon an industrial dispute which arose between Class III and Class IV employees who were appointed subsequent to September 1, 1956 in the Corporation.\nRegulation 19 of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (Staff) Regulations 1960 which came into force w.e.f.\nJuly 1, 1960 was amended and the employees of the Corporation were divided both longitudinally and latitudinally insofar as the age of retirement was con cerned.\nLongitudinally, all the transferred employees be longing to Class I and II became entitled to continue in service till they attained the age of 60 years, the Corpora tion being empowered to retire any of them prematurely on completion of 55 years of age if his efficiency was found to have been impaired, and all the Class I and Class II offi cers appointed to the service of the Corporation on or after September 1, 1956 had to retire on completion of 58 years of age subject again to the power of the Corporation to retire any such employee on completion of 55 years of age or at any time thereafter if his efficiency was found to have been impaired.\nLatitudinally, the employees were divided into two groups and all the employees belonging to Class III and Class IV, irrespective of the tact whether they were trans ferred employees or employees appointed after September 1, 1956 were entitled to continue in service till 60 years of age, but the employees belonging to Class I and Class II who were appointed to the service of the Corporation on or after September 1, 1956 had to retire on the completion of 58 years of age subject to the usual clause relating to prema ture retirement.\nSub regulation (2) of Regulation 19 was modified empow ering the appointing authority to extend at its discretion of service of any employee of the Corporation belonging to Class I or Class II categories appointed to service on or after September 1, 1956 for one year at a time upto 60 years of age.\nThe power to extend the service of employees belong ing to Class I and Class II appointed on or after September 1, 1956 beyond 58 years or ' age was withdrawn from January 21, 1977 and the Corporation was permitted to retire an employee on completion of 50 years of age.\nThe first respondent joined the Corporation as a Class III employee on March 22, 1957.\nSubsequently, he was promot ed to a Class I post and ultimately as Assistant Divisional Manager.\nSince he was born in the month of June, 1926, notice was issued to him in February, 1984 of his retirement which was due on June 30, 1984 on his completing the age of 58 years.\nBefore the date of his retirement, he instituted a writ petition in the High Court questioning the validity of Regulation 19(2) of the (Staff) Regulations, 1960, as it stood then and prayed for the issue 183 of writ of mandamus directing the Corporation not to retire him before he attained the age of 60 years.\nIt was contended by the first respondent before the High Court that there was no justification to prescribe two different ages of retirement one for the transferred employ ees belonging to Class I and Class II categories and the other for the employees who joined the service of the Corpo ration alter September 1, 1956 and who also belonged to Class I and Class II categories, and that in regard to those who joined the service after being appointed to Class III post after September 1, 1956, there could not be any reduc tion of age of retirement from 60 to 58 years on their being promoted to a Class I or Class II post.\nSince he had the right to continue in service if he had remained in Class III only till he attained the age of 60 years as a Class III employee, age of retirement could not be reduced to 58 years only because he had been promoted to a Class I post.\nIt was urged on behalf of the Corporation and the Union of India that the transferred employees and the employees who joined the service after September 1, 1956 belonged to two distinct and separate classes which had been treated differently throughout for valid reasons.\nSince there was no uniformity in the establishments in which the transferred employees were working prior to nationalisation of the life insurance business, it became necessary to fix the age of retirement of the transferred employees on a lair, equitable and just basis.\nIn the circumstances, the classification of the employees into two categories, namely, transferred employees and others who joined on or after September 1, 1956 for the purposes of age of superannuation was a valid classification and Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution had not been violated.\nIt was further submitted that the discrimination made between the employees belonging to Class I and Class II on the one hand and the employees belonging to Class III and Class IV on the other in the matter of the age of superannuation was not invalid since they belonged to two different categories of employees who were governed by different conditions of service as regards pay, perquisites, allowances, administrative powers etc.\nThe High Court did not find any unconstitutionality in a rule or regulation providing the age of retirement at 60 years of employees who had been absorbed from the service of the erstwhile insurers and to that extent it held that the grouping being reasonable the Court might not travel into the domain of legislative policy.\nIt, however, found that when once a transferred employee belonging to Class III and an emp 184 loyee appointed after 1st September, 1956 by the Corporation to a Class III post is promoted to Class I, the distinction of the transferred employee and direct appointee could not be maintained, as on promotion they became persons belonging to the same category of employees enjoying the same condi tions of service.\nHence the age of retirement should be the same in the case of both such promotees.\nIt accordingly held that the first respondent was entitled to continue till he attained the age of 60 years as other Class I employees belonging to the category of transferred employees.\nThe Writ Petition was allowed and Regulation 19(2) was struck down as being violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and the Corporation was directed not to retire the first respondent before he attained the age of 60 years.\nAllowing the appeals, by special leave, of the Life Insurance Corporation of India and the Union of India, this Court, HELD: 1.1 The decision taken by the Corporation and the Central Government as regards the ages of retirement of the different classes of the employees of the Corporation is a bona fide one and cannot be characterised as unreasonable and it is not, therefore, liable to be upset by a decision of the Court.\n[222G] 1.2 In the instant case, the High Court erred in strik ing down Regulation 19(2) of the L.I.C. (Staff) Regulations 1960 as amended in the year 1977 and in directing the Corpo ration to continue the first respondent in its service till he completed the age of 60 years.\n[223A] 2.1 Classification of employees into two categories for purposes of fixing the age of superannuation depending upon the date of entry into service is not something which is unusual, and such classification becomes necessary on ac count of historical facts and the need for treating the employees in a fair and just way.\n[220G] 2.2 Merely because the pay, allowances and other perqui sites drawn by the transferred employees and by the employ ees appointed after September 1, 1956 by the Corporation are the same, it cannot be said that the transferred employees and the other employees had been integrated so as to form one cadre.\nSo far as the age of retirement is concerned, they are being treated differently right from the date on which the Corporation was established.\n[221G] 2.3 In the instant case, since the classification of the employees for the purpose of age of retirement into two categories is reasonable 185 and not arbitrary and there is a reasonable nexus between the classification and the object to be attained thereby, it is not possible to ho1d that Regulation 19(2) is violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.\n[222C] 3.\nThe Act itself made a distinction between the trans ferred employees and the employees recruited to the service of the Corporation after September 1, 1956 by making amend ments in Section 11 and in clauses (b) and (bb) of sub section (2) of Section 49 of the Act.\nIn the (Staff) Regula tions, 1956 and the (Staff) Regulations, 1960 there was again a distinction made between the transferred employees and the employees recruited alter September 1, 1956.\nThe distinction between the two classes Is recognised by Parlia ment even as late as 1981 which it amended Section 49 of the Act by deleting clause (bb) of sub section (2) thereof and by amending Section 48.\nof the Act by introducing clause (cc) in sub section (2) and the new sub section (2A) in it.\nAt no point of time the transferred employees were integrat ed into one cadre alongwith employees appointed after Sep tember 1, 1956 as such and the transferred employees have retained their birth marks throughout.\nThe tact that the pay, allowances and other conditions or services have been made the same in respect of both the transferred employees and the employees of the Corporation recruited after Septem ber 1, 1956 has not brought about the integration of the two Classes of employees into one single cadre.\n[214GH; 215A: E F] 4.1 The determination of 58 years as age of superannua tion, in the case of the employees, who entered service after September 1, 1956 by itself cannot be considered to be arbitrary since in almost all the public sector corpora tions, Central services and the State services, 58 years age is considered to be a reasonable age at which officers can be directed to retire from their service.\n[212C] 4.2 Regarding the dIscrimination in the age or ' retire ment between employees belonging to Class I and Class II on the one hand and Class III and Class IV on the other, it is true that originally employees belonging to Class III and Class IV categories amongst the transferred employees were given the benefit of retirement at the age of 60 years, but the employees belonging to Class III and Class IV categories after 1st September, 1956 were required to retire on the completion of 58 years of age.\nPursuant to the settlement arrived at between the Management and the Class III and IV employees recruited after September 1, 1956.\nthis discrimi nation was removed and Regulation 19 was amended w.e.f.\nJune 19, 1965.\n[212D F] 186 4.3 Having regard to the lower emoluments and other benefits which the employees belonging to Class III and Class IV are entitled to get from the Corporation and the higher emoluments and other benefits to which officers belonging to Class I and Class II are entitled to and also the nature of their work and the powers enjoyed by them, fixation of different ages of retirement to the different classes of employees could not by itself be violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.\n[212F G] 5.\nHaving regard to different conditions of service that were prevailing in the various establishments whose business was taken over by the Corporation, fixation of age of super annuation is one of the essential parts or ' the process of transfer and integration to which sub section (2) of Section 11 of the Act is applicable.\nThe fixation of 60 years as the age of superannuation in the case of transferred employees cannot be considered to be unreasonable in view of the history of this case.\n[208C D] 6.\nThe transferred employees who are treated favourably belong to a vanishing group and, perhaps, within a period of two years none of them would be in the service of the Corpo ration.\nThereafter, only one class of employees would be in the service of the Corporation, namely, those appointed subsequent to September 1, 1956 by the Corporation in re spect of whom the Corporation has fixed the age of retire ment as 58 years which corresponds to the age or ' retirement in almost all the public sector establishments, the Central Government services and the State Government services.\n[221C E] 7.\nThe High Court was right in holding that it was not discriminatory to extend the benefit of the age of 60 years to the transferred employees.\nHowever, it was not correct in holding that on promotion from Class III to Class I, the transferred employees and the directly recruited employees would lose their birth marks.\nThe intention of Parliament was that even as late as in 1981 the two groups of employ ees, namely, the transferred employees and employees re cruited after September 1, 1956 in the Corporation should be kept separate.\nIn these circumstances, the High Court was in the error in holding that when employees are recruited to a lower grade from two sources, no favourable treatment should be extended to recruits from one source on their promotion to the higher grade.\nThe fact that an employee had entered the service of the Corporation after September 1, 1956 in a Class III post and is later on promoted to a Class I post does not make any difference.\n[216E H; 217D] 187 8.\nIn the instant case, when the first respondent was promoted to the Class I post in 1963 the age of retirement of officers in the Class I post had been fixed at 58 years and was not different from the age of retirement of Class III employees.\nIt was only in 1965 under the settlement, the age of retirement of employees in Class III and Class IV who joined service after September 1, 1956 was raised to 60 years.\nIf he felt that the conditions of service ill ' Class I officers were likely to be prejudicial to him, he could have refused the promotion offered to him.\nHaving accepted the promotion alongwith the higher benefits flowing from it he cannot contend after several years that he had been prejudicially affected by the condition relating to the age of retirement applicable to Class I officers appointed after September 1, 1956.\nThat apart, the higher emoluments and other perquisites to which Class I employees may be entitled to and the better conditions of work which are enjoyed by them substantially compensate the effect of the lowering of the age of retirement from 60 years to 58 years.\n[213E G] Christopher Pimenta and Others vs Life Insurance Corpo ration of India, ; Life Insurance Corporation of India vs D.J. Bahadur & Ors., [1981] 1 S.C.R. 1083; Ram Lal Wadhwa & Anr.\nvs The State of Haryana & 0rs.\n; , ; State of Punjab vs Joginder Singh, [1963] Supp. 2 S.C.R. 169; Tejinder Singh and Another vs Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and Anr., [1986] 4 S.C.C. 237; Roshan Lal Tandon vs Union of India, [1968] 1 S.C.11.\n185; Miss Lena Khan vs Union of India and Ors., Jt. ; Railway Board vs A. Pitchumani, [1972] 2 S.C.R. 187; Manindra Chandra Sen vs Union of India & Ors., A.I.R. ; M/s British Paints (India) Ltd. vs The Work men; , ; Mohammad Shujat Ali & Ors. etc.\nvs Union of India & Ors. etc.\n; ; Workmen of the Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (Refining Division) Bombay vs Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and Another, ; ; Tamil Nadu Education Department Minis terial & General Subordinate Service Association vs State of Tamil Nadu & Anr., ; , referred to.", + "3542": "The appellants wrote a letter to the President of India, with copies to some others including the Chief Jus tice of Punjab and Haryana High Court, criticising, the behaviour of a High Court Judge, who, during his visit to the Sessions Division of Bhivani, spoke against the Govern ment 's policies and canvassed for a communist system.\nThe High Court issued a notice against the appellants; making out a case of criminal contempt of court.\nThe appellants tendered a conditional apology contingent on the courts finding their action to be contempt of court.\nThe apology was accepted.\nAllowing the appeals and dropping the contempt proceedings, the Court.\nHELD: (1) The elementary basis of acceptance of apology is that there is to be a finding of committal of contempt.\nThe Full Bench fell into the error of accepting the apology without finding that the appellants committed any contempt In the absence of such a finding, no question arises for acceptance of apology.\nF G] (2) Judges are, by reason of their office and nature of work, expected not to get involved in controversial matters, or to concern themselves with political issues or policies undertaken by political parties.\nIf any Judge addresses on political problems or controversies, the Judge exposes himself to discussion by public.\nHe cannot in such a case take shelter behind his office if the public discusses and criticises the views expressed by him, and the protective umbrella of the court cannot be used by way of bringing the critics on the charge of contempt of Court.\n[246 A D, F G]", + "266": "Sub section (4) of section 5 of the Taxation on Income (Investigation Commission) Act, 1947, does not deal with the same class of persons as are said to have been grouped together in subsection (1) of section 5 of the Act as persons who to a substantial extent evaded payment of taxation on income.\nOn a plain reading of the section it is clear that sub section (4) of section 5 is not limited only to persons who made extraordinary profits and to all persons who may have evaded payment of taxation on income irrespective of whether the evaded profits are substantial or insubstantial and therefore the scope of sub section (4) of section 5 is different from the scope of sub section (1) of section 5 both in extent and range.\nSub section (4) of section 5 of the Act, obviously deals with the same class of persons who fall within the ambit of section 34 of the Indian Income tax Act and are dealt with in sub section (1) of that section and whose income can be caught by the proceeding under that section.\nIt is not possible to hold that all such persons who evaded payment of income tax and do not truly disclose all particulars or material facts necessary for their assessment and against whom a, report is made under sub section (4) of section 5 of the impugned 449 Act by themselves form a class distinct from those who evade payment of income tax and come within the ambit of section 34 of the Indian Income tax Act.\nBoth section 34 of the Indian Income tax Act, 1.922, and subsection (4) of section 5 of the Taxation on Income (Investigation Commission) Act, 1947, deal with all persons who have similar characteristics and similar properties, the common characteristics being that they are persons who have not truly disclosed their income and have evaded payment of taxation on income.\nThe procedure prescribed by the Taxation on Income (Investigation Commission) Act, 1947, is substantially more prejudicial and more drastic to the assessee than the procedure under the Indian Income tax Act (XI of 1922).\nHeld, therefore that sub section (4) of section 5 and the procedure prescribed by the impugned Act in so far as it affects the persons proceeded against under that sub section being a piece of discriminatory legislation offends against the provisions of article 14 of the Constitution and is thus void and unenforceable.", + "3210": "The respondent was required by the Chief Inspector of Shops and Establishments to register its establishment ' under the Delhi Shops and Establishments Act, 1954.\nThe respondent contended that it was not an 'establishment ' which is defined in section 2(9) as meaning 'a shop or a commercial estab lishment ' and did not comply with the direction.\nProceedings for prosecution of its Secretary were instituted, where upon the respondent filed a petition in the High Court for quashing the order of the appellant and for directing the Magistrate not to proceed with the complaint.\nBefore the High Court the appellant contended that the respondent was a 'commercial establishment ' because, the activity of the respondent amounted to a 'Profession ', and alternatively, that the case fell within the latter part of the definition of 'commercial establishment ' in section 2(5), inasmuch as its activities were connected with trade and business generally, but, it was not urged that the activity of the respondent amounted to carrying on any 'business or trade ' in its premises.\nThe writ petition was allowed by the High Court, holding that premises of the respondent were not a 'commercial establishment '.\nIn appeal to this Court it was contended that the activities of the respondent amounted to a 'trade or business ', that therefore it was a 'commercial establishment ' and that the matter was covered by Management of the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry vs Sri R. K. Mittal [1972] 2 S.C.R. 353.\nAllowing the appeal.\nHELD : (1) It is not proper to shut out the contentions of the appellant now raised about the activity of the respondent being a 'trade or business ' merely on the ground that the point was not properly put before the High Court.\nThe question is only one of drawing a correct inference about the point in issue from the material already on record and will not require any additional material for decision.\n[354E F] (2)A place, in order to fall within the definition of 'commercial establishment ' must, in the first instance, be 'premises '.\nand secondly, should be premises wherein, (a) any trade, business or profession is carried on, or (b) any work in connection with or incidental or ancillary thereto is carried on.\n[353C D] (3) The registered office of the respondent is 'premises '.\n[353D] (4) All the activities of the respondent are business activities and are carried on systematically.\nThough the profit made by it is ploughed back for its purposes as set out in its Memorandum of Association and is not distributed among its members.\nTherefore, the decision in Mittal 's case [1972] 2 S.C.R. 353 that the activity of the respondent is in the nature of 'business or trade ' is correct and that case does not require reconsideration.\n[356A E. 357D E] (5)A systematic activity can be a business activity even if no dividends are declared or profits shared.\n[356F G] In the matter of Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England and Wales , applied.\n(6)The premises of the respondent, therefore, are a 'commercial establishment.\n[357E] 349 (7)For the application of the Act to the respondent it is immaterial whether its activities bring its premises within the ambit of a 'shop ' or 'commercial establishment, within the meaning of the Act.\nIn Mittal 's case it was held that the activities of the respondent are also in the nature of material services within the wider definition of 'industry ' and, any premises where services are rendered to customers fall within the definition of a 'shop.\n[356E F]", + "1974": "The respondent was the head of a Hindu undivided family and was the descendant of a Jagirdar.\nCertain disputes between the Jagirdar and the Zamindars in the district had been settled in 1837 by a compromise between the British Government and the then Jagirdar, whereby, the Government granted the Jagirdar and his heirs a pension in perpetuity to be calculated on the basis of one fourth of the revenue of the Jagir.\nBy this arrangement the collections from the Jagir became payable by the Zamindars direct to the Government and the Jagirdar and his successors no longer remained the proprietors of the Jagir and became entitled only to a pension.\nThe Income tax Officer assessed the receipt of the pension by the respondent as part of his regular income and rejected the latter 's contention that the amount received was agricultural income within the meaning of section 4(3)(viii) of the Income tax Act, 1922.\nIn appeal, the Assistant Commissioner accepted the respondent 's contention, but the Tribunal reversed this finding.\nThe High Court, on a reference, decided the issue in favour of the respondent, on the grounds, inter alia, that the right conferred under the compromise of 1837 was a right to a share of one fourth in the net land revenue collections and furthermore, the amount received by the successors of the Jagirdar varied from year to year.\nIn the appeal before the Supreme Court, it was also contended on behalf of the respondent that the amount received was in the nature of a capital receipt, being a payment to the Jagirdar and his successors of compensation for relinquishing the title to the Jagir lands.\nHELD: (i) Under the compromise and arrangement of 1837, the respondent had no interest in the land or in the land revenue payable in respect thereof.\n[704 A] State of U.P.v.\nKunwar Sri Trivikram Narain Singh; , , followed.\nAs the source of the income in this case was the arrangement of 1837, the income could not be held to be derived from land within the meaning of the definition of agricultural income in section 2(1)(a) of the Act.\nEven if the income varied from year to year, the source of the income was still the arrangement and not land.\n[705 G] Maharajkumar Gopal Saran Narain Singh, vs\nC.I.T. Bihar and Orissa, , C.I.T. Bihar and Orissa vs Raja Bahadur Kamkhya Narayan Singh and Ors, , Mrs. Bacha F. Guzdar vs\nC.I.T. Bombay , MaharaJadhiraja Sir Kameshwar Singh, vs C.I.T. Bihar and Orissa, , followed.\n(ii) The amount received by the respondent was not a capital receipt but revenue income and therefore taxable.\n701 Where an owner of an estate exchanges a capital asset for a perpetual annuity, it is ordinarily taxable in his hands.\nThe position would be different if he exchanged his estate for a capital sum payable in installments.\nSuch installments when received would not be taxable as income.\nBut in the present case there was no material to show that the amount received was an instalment of this nature.\n[706 H~707C] Commissioner of Inland Revenue vs Wesleyan and General Assurance Society, , and Perrin vs Dickson , referred to.", + "6003": "The petitioners in the writ petitions were appointed as Supervisors Grade 'A ' in various ordnance factories betwe en 1962 and 1966, in pursuance of circular dated 6th Novembe r, 1962 issued by the Director General of Ordnance Factorie section The circular further provided for promotion from Supervis or 'A ' to Chargeman I1, on completion of two years ' satisfact o ry service.\n75 Supervisors Grade 'A ' had moved a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court in 1972.\nTheir grievance was th at even though quite a large number of Supervisors Grade ' A ' had been promoted to the post of Chargeman Grade II on completion of two years ' satisfactory work, in pursuance of the circular dated 6th November, 1962, they had been di s criminated against and had not been so promoted immediate ly on the expiry of two years ' service.\nThe writ petition was contested on the ground that t he promotion from Supervisor Grade 'A ' to Chargeman II we re governed by the Indian Ordnance Factories (Recruitment a nd Conditions of Service of Grade III Personnel) Rules, 19 56 and such promotions could be made only in accordance wi th the procedure prescribed by Rule 8 of these Rules.\nThe learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition on the ground of unexplained laches.\nThe Division Bench did n ot find any substance in the submission made on behalf of t he petitioners and dis 93 missed their special appeal.\nAccording to the Divisi on Bench, it was difficult to read in the circular that aft er two years of satisfactory service there would be automat ic promotion from Supervisor Grade 'A ' to Chargeman II as su ch a view would militate against Rule 12 of the Rules, whi ch provided that no appointment shall be made otherwise than as specified in the Rules.\nIt was further held by the Divisi on Bench that even assuming that some Supervisors Grade 'A ' h ad been automatically promoted on completion of two year s ' service, without the recommendation after screening by t he Promotion Committee, as provided in Rule 8, no right wou ld accrue in favour of the appellants inasmuch as such prom o tions would be in the teeth of Rule 12.\nAgainst the judgment of the Division Bench, Civil Appe al No. 441 of 1981 (Virendra Kumar and Others vs Union of Ind ia and Others, was preferred and this Court by its order dated 2.2.1981 directed that the cases of the 75 appellants in Civil Appeal No. 441 of 1981 be considered f or promotion as Chargeman Grade II and they be so promot ed unless found to be unfit.\nAnother group of 125 Supervisors Grade 'A ' got t he benefit of the Circular dated 6.11.1962 in pursuance of an order passed by the Madhya Pradesh High Court on 4th Apr il 1983 on the basis of the judgment of this Court in Civ il Appeal No. 441 of 1981.\nSpecial Leave Petitions against t he judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court were dismissed by this Court.\nThe petitioners in the present writ petitions pray th at the same relief may be granted to them as had been grant ed in Civil Appeal No. 441 of 1981.\nIn the Civil Miscellaneous petitions now filed in Civ il Appeal No. 441 of 1981, the petitioners, apart from t he prayer for initiating proceedings for contempt against t he respondents for disobedience of the order of this Cou rt dated 2.2.1981, have prayed for orders directing the r e spondents to implement in true letter and spirit the sa id order and to promote the petitioners to the next high er posts after giving them the benefit of the directions of that order.\nTheir grievance is that their promotion tant a mounts to implementation of the order of this Court dat ed 2.2.1981 only on paper inasmuch as they have not been gran t ed the difference of back wages and promotion to high er posts on the basis of their back date promotion as Chargem an II.\nBefore this Court it has been urged on behalf of the r e spondents 94 that (i) promotions of employees including Supervisor ' A ' were governed by the Rules and in view of Rule 12 no a p pointment could be made otherwise than as specified therei n; (ii) appointments by promotion were to be made according to Rule 8 on the basis of selection list prepared in the mann er provided there in and there was no scope for automat ic promotion merely after expiry of 2 years of continuo us service on the basis of the circular dated 6th Novembe r, 1962; (iii) the circular which was in the nature of an executive instruction prescribed 2 years ' service as Supe r visor 'A ' to make them only eligible for promotion; and (i v) after the issue of the subsequent order dated 28th Decembe r, 1965 and circular dated 20th January, 1966 no Supervis or could claim to have become eligible for promotion merely on completion of 2 years ' satisfactory service and his prom o tion thereafter could be effected only in accordance wi th the normal Rules.\nDismissing the writ petitions and disposing of t he miscellaneous petitions, it was, HELD: (1) An executive instruction could make a prov i sion only with regard to a matter which was not covered by the Rules and such executive instruction could not overri de any provision of the Rule.\n[103E] B.N. Nagarajan vs State of Mysore, ; 2; Sant Ram Sharma vs State of Rajasthan, 1; Ramchandra Shenkar Deoghar vs The State of Maharashtr a; , ; Union of India vs Somasundaram Viswanat h, [1988] 3 SC.\nJudgments Today 724, referred to.\n(2) Notwithstanding the issue of instructions dated 6 th November, 1962 the procedure for making promotion as la id down in Rule 8 of the Rules had to be followed, and the sa id procedure could not be abrogated by the executive instru c tions dated 6th November 1962.\n[103F] (3) The only effect of the circular dated 6th Novemb er 1962 was that Supervisors 'A ' on completion of 2 year s ' satisfactory service could be promoted by following t he procedure contemplated by Rule 8.\nThis circular had inde ed the effect of accelerating the chance of promotion.\nT he right to promotion on the other hand was to be governed by the Rules.\nThis right of promotion as provided by the Rul es was neither affected nor could be affected by the circula r. [103F G] 95 (4) After the coming into force of the order dated 28 th December, 1965 and the circular dated 20th January, 19 66 promotions could not be made just on completion of 2 year s ' satisfactory service under the earlier circular dated 6 th November, 1962, the same having been superseded by the lat er circular.\n[106H; 107A B] (5) Circular dated 20th January, 1966 could not be treated to be one affecting adversely any condition of service of Supervisors 'A '.\nIts only effect was that t he chance of promotion which had been accelerated by the circ u lar dated 6th November, 1962 was deferred and made depende nt on selection according to the Rules.\nThough a right to be considered for promotion was a condition of service, me re chances of promotion were not.\n[106G H] Ramchandra Shankar Deodhar vs The State of Maharashtr a, (supra) and Mohammad Shujat Ali & Ors.\nvs Union of India Ors.\n; , , referred to.\n(6) Supervisors 'A ' who had been promoted before t he coming into force of the order dated 28th December, 1965 a nd the circular dated 20th January, 1966 stood in a cla ss separate from those whose promotions were to be made ther e after.\nThe fact that some Supervisors 'A ' had been promot ed before the coming into force of the order dated 20th Jan u ary, 1966 could not, therefore, constitute the basis for an argument that those Supervisors 'A ' whose cases came up f or consideration thereafter and who were promoted in due cour se in accordance with the Rules, were discriminated agains t. [107B C] (7) There were sufficient indications that when Civ il Appeal No. 441 of 1981 was heard by this Court either t he subsequent order dated 28th December, 1965 as well as t he circular dated 20th January, 1966 and the legal consequenc es flowing therefrom were not brought to the notice of t he learned Judges by the learned counsel for the respondent s, or the same was not properly emphasized.\n[105E F] (8) The findings of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in i ts judgment dated 4th April stood approved by this Court wh en the Court dismissed the special leave petition against th at judgment.\nThe appellants in Civil Appeal No. 441 of 19 81 therefore deserved to be granted the same benefit as regar ds back wages and further promotion as were given by the Madh ya Pradesh High Court to such of the petitioners before th at Court who were Supervisors 'A ' and were granted promotion as Chargeman I1 by its judgment dated 4th April, 1983.\n[108 H;", + "5141": "Sub section (7) of section 63 of the empowers the State Transport Authority, for the purpose of promoting tourism, to grant permits valid for the whole or any part of India, in respect of such number of tourist vehicles as the Central Government may in respect of that State specify in this behalf.\nA proviso to that sub section, introduced by section 24 of the Amending Act of 1978 laid down that preference shall be given to applications for permits from (i) the India Tourism Development Corporation; (iii) a State Tourism Development Corporation; (iii) a State Tourist Department, and (iv) operators of tourist cars, or travel agents, approved in this behalf by the Central Government.\nThere were as many as 495 applications before the Karnataka State Transport Authority for the grant of 14 All India Tourist Vehicle permits.\nBy its proceedings dated April 30, 1984, the Authority granted 11 permits to the Karnataka State Tourism Development Corporation, one to the Indian Tourism Development Corporation and two to the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation.\n1009 On appeals being preferred, the Karnataka State Transport Appellate Tribunal, by its order dated February 28, 1985 set aside the grant of two permits in favour of the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation, three out of eleven permits to the Karnataka State Tourism Development Corporation, and instead granted three permits to private operators and increased the number of permits granted to the Indian Tourism Development Corporation from one to three, on the premises that in view of the rule of preference enunciated by the proviso to section 63(7) the applications from the non preferred category had to be excluded as the number of applications from the applicants who were required to be given preference exceeded the number of permits to be granted.\nThough some of the appellants before the Tribunal had better expertise, experience and resources they did not succeed.\nThe High Court rejected the writ petitions on the ground that the rule of preference contained in the proviso to section 63(7) contemplated exclusion of the 'non preferred ' class, if sufficient number of applicants from the preferred classes were available.\nIn these appeals by special leave, it was contended for the appellants that on a correct interpretation of the proviso to section 63(7) the preference became operative only if other things were equal.\nIt was also urged that the fourth sub clause of the proviso offended article 14 of the Constitution, and had to be struck down.\nAllowing the appeals, the Court, ^ HELD: 1.1 The rule contained in the proviso to section 63(7) of the is a rule of preference and not a rule of exclusion, for it does not say that the permit shall be granted to the categories of operators specified therein.\nThe claims of eligible applicants must be considered on merits, applying the rule of preference whenever the claims are approximately equal.\nThe application of an applicant is not to be altogether excluded from consideration on the sole ground that another applicant is entitled to preference.\nThough the proviso does not expressly refer to other things being equal, the principle is very much implicit in it.\n[1015B E] 1.2 What has been said by this Court in Sher Singh vs Union of India; , , about preference in relation to section 47(1 H) applies mutatis mutandis to the preference contemplated by the proviso to section 63(7) in the instant case.\n[1017C] 1010 2.1 Clause (iv) of the proviso to section 63(7) is arbitrary, unreasonable and unconstitutional.\nThere is no indication in it as to the manner in which the approval of the Central Government is to be sought and granted and the considerations which are expected to weigh with the Central Government.\nIt compels a tribunal, created by a statute for the purpose of considering rival claims and granting permits on merits, to give preference to persons securing the approval of the Executive Government.\nTo the extent the clause goes, it pre empts the decision of the designated tribunal by executive discretion.\n[1017E G] 2.2 The clause provides for a preference not to operators of tourist vehicles but to operators of tourist cars and travel agents, though the permits to be granted are for tourist vehicles.\nIt is difficult to understand why preference should be given to operators of tourist cars in the matter of granting permits for tourist vehicles which may well be omnibuses required to travel long distances.\n[1018B C] 2.3 The experience of running a tourist taxi cannot be said to be a better qualification than running a tourist bus when the question is of granting permits for tourist vehicles.\n[1018C D] 3.\nHaving regard to the definitions of 'tourist vehicle ' and 'motor car ' contained in section 2(29 A) and section 2(16) respectively of the Act, the expression 'tourist cars ' cannot be said to mean 'tourist vehicles '.\nWhile a tourist vehicle may include a motor car, a motor car, by definition, excludes an omnibus.\n[1018D E] In the instant case, the State Transport Appellate Tribunal and the High Court have failed to consider the merits of the claims of the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation and the private operators who did not get a certificate of approval from the Central Government, because of the rule of preference contained in proviso to section 63(7).\nTheir orders are, therefore, set aside.\nThe State Transport Appellate Tribunal is directed to re hear the appeals and dispose them of in accordance with law.\n[1017C E]", + "2207": "By a registered instrument dated October 5, 1956, the respondent purchased the business carried on by a dealer as defined in the Madras General Sales Tax Act IX of 1939.\nThe dealer had been assessed to sales tax in respect of his turnover for the years 1948 49 and 1949 50 and had paid a part of the sales tax determined as due from him with the balance amount remaining in arrears.\nThe sales tax authorities attempted to recover the arrears from the respondent as the purchaser of the business and although he denied liability, his contention was overruled by the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer.\nHis appeal to the Board of Revenue was also dismissed and he thereafter filed a Writ Petition under article 226 of the Constitution, challenging the orders of the C.T.O. and the Board.\nA Single Bench of the High Court dismissed the appeal but a Division Bench allowed a Letters Patent Appeal holding that Rule 21 A of the Sales Tax Rules under which the arrears were sought to be recovered from the respondent, was illegal and ultra vires the Act.\nIn the appeal to the Supreme Court it was contended, Inter alia, on behalf of the department (i) that Rule 21 A was valid having been made in exercise of the rule making power granted to the State Government under sections 19(1) and 19(2) (c) of the Act whereby it could make rules for the assessment to tax under the Act of businesses which were discontinued or the ownership of which had changed; (ii) that further more under section 10, the whole of the amount outstanding on the date of the default was charged on the property of the person liable to pay the tax; therefore, in the present case, the business which was transferred to the respondent was charged with the payment of sales tax and it was open to the sales tax authorities to proceed against the assets of the business for realising the amount of sales tax due; and (iii) that upon a true construction of the registered instrument dated October 5, 1956, the respondent undertook to pay all liabilities like sales tax imposed in regard to the business.\nHELD: dismissing the appeal: (i) Rule 21 A was beyond the rule making power of the State Government either under section 19(1) or section 19(2)(c) and was therefore ultra vires the Act.\n[666 E F] Although by the amending Act 1 of 1959, an express provision was inserted by which the transferee of the business was made liable for the arrears of sales tax due from the transferor, there was no Such provision in the Act during the period covered by the present case.\n[664 D] it is manifest that the person who purchases a business as a 'dealer ' can be assessed to sales tax onlY in respect of his turnover and under the scheme of the charging provision of the Act, the purchaser of the busi 662 ness has nothing to do with the sales effected by the seller of the business, The turnover in respect of such sales remains.\ntherefore, the turnover of the transferor and not of the transferee.\n[664 C] Although section 19(2)(c) deals with the assessment to tax of businesses which are discontinued or the ownership of which has changed, in the context and background of other sections of the Act, the word \"assessment\" used in para 19(2)(c) does not include the.\npower of recovering tax assessed from a person other than the assessee.\n[664 F G; 665 B C] Badridas Daga vs C.I.T., , 211; Chatturam vs C.I.7.\nBihar.\n; and Whitney vs Commissioners of Inland Revenue, , relied on.\n(ii) section 10 of the Act as amended and sought to be relied upon had not come into force until October 8, 1956; in the present case the registered instrument by which the business was transferred to the respondent was dated October 5, 1956 and the amended section therefore had no Application.\n[666 F] (iii) It was not open to the State Government to rely on the instrument inter vivos between the transferor and the transferee and to contend that there was any contractual obligation between the transferee and the State Government who was not a party to the instrument.\n[667 BC]", + "2593": "The first respondent while he was holding the post of a Senior Jailor in March, 1954, was suspended on the allegations that he had committed certain acts of misappropriation and maltreatment of prisoners.\nAfter January, 1955.\nA show cause notice was then issued to him to which he replied by a written statement.\nThe respondent was dismissed by an order of Inspector General of Prisons in February, 1955.\nThe respondent filed a suit for a declaration that enquiry report was never supplied to him and consequently he had not been given reasonable opportunity within the meaning of article 311 of the Constitution.\nHe also prayed for a decree for arrears of pay from April, 1954 to May, 1960.\nHis suit was dismissed by the trial court but he succeeded in the first appeal where the order of dismissal was declared illegal and void.\nAn appeal by the respondent to the High Court claiming arrears of salary was allowed.\nAs the State of Bombay had, in the meantime, been reorganised, the High Court also directed that the liability for arrears of salary upto the date of suit would be that of the State of Maharashtra and the liability arising out of the declaration that the appellant was in Government service would be the liability of the State of Gujarat.\nA Letters Patent appeal filed by the State of Maharashtra was dismissed.\nIn appeal to this Court, it was contended, inter alia, on behalf of the appellant that the liability to pay arrears of pay was not a liability arising out of a contract within the meaning of section 60 of the Bombay Reorganisation Act of 1960 but it was a liability in respect of an actionable wrong other than a breach of contract within the meaning of section 61 of the Act.\nHELD: (1) The High Court had rightly found that the failure on the part of the competent authority to provide the respondent with a copy of the report of the Enquiry Officer amounted to denial of reasonable opportunity contemplated by article 311(2) of the Constitution.\nThe Inspector General of Prisons had the report before him and the tentative conclusions arrived at by the Enquiry Officer were bound to influence him and in depriving the plaintiff of a copy of the report he was handicapped in not knowing what material was influencing the Inspector General of Prisons.\n[920 F] Union of India vs H. C. Goel, ; , 728, referred to.\nIt is true that the question whether reasonable opportunity has or has not been ' afforded to the Government servant must depend on the facts 918 of each case, but it would be in very rare cases indeed in which it could be said that the Government servant is not prejudiced by the non supply of the report of the Enquiry officer.\n[921 B] (2) The decree of the High Court decreeing payment of arrears of salary is truly a liability in proceedings relating to a contract within section 60(2) (a) of the Act.\nAlthough the words 'actionable wrong ' other than breach of contract in this context are wide words and include something more than torts, but even so where a suit is brought by a Government servant for arrears of salary the decree more properly falls under section 60 of the Act rather than under a. 61.\n[925 B] State of Tripura vs The Province of East Bengal, ; , 44, State of Bihar vs Abdul Majid, [1954] S.C.R. 786, Owner of section section Raphael vs Brandy, , Inland Revenue Commissioner vs Hambrook, [1956] 1 AR E.R. 807, 811 12, Reilly vs R., , 179; Terrell vs Secretary of State for the Colonies, , 499; R. vs Doultre, and Bushe vs R., (May 29, 1869, The Times), considered.", + "1195": "The appellants and the respondents were owners of adjoining collieries and the suit out of which the present appeal arose was one brought by the respondents for certain reliefs on the allegation that the appellants had encroached upon their coal mines and removed coal from the encroached portion and that they came to know of the said encroachment and removal of coal after they had received the letter dated August 18, 1941, from the Inspector of Mines.\nThe appellant denied the encroachment and pleaded that the suit was barred by limitation inasmuch as the respondents had knowledge of the encroachment in 1932 then there was a survey by the Department of Mines.\nThe trial judge found on evidence that the proceedings in 1932 had nothing to do with the matter, held that article 48 of the Limitation Act applied to the suit and that the appellants had failed to prove that the respondents had knowledge of the sinking of the quarries and pits in the encroached land and decreed the suit.\nThe High Court on appeal accepted the finding of the trial court and although it placed the burden of proving knowledge on the part of the respondents beyond the prescribed time on the appellants, nevertheless proceeded on the assumption that the initial burden to prove that they had knowledge of the said encroachment within the period was on the respondents and affirmed the decree of the trial court.\nHeld, that the burden of proof had not been misplaced.\nUnder article 48 of the Indian Limitation Act, which prescribes a three years ' limitation from the date of the knowledge, the initial onus is obviously on the plaintiff to prove that date since it would be within his special knowledge.\nMoreover, under section 3 of the Act, which makes its obligatory on the court to dismiss a suit barred by limitation, even though such a plea is not set up in defence, it is for the plaintiff to establish that the suit is not so barred.\nLalchand Marwari vs Mahant Rampur Gir, pat.\n(P.C.) 312 and Rajah Sahib Perhalad Seim vs Maharajah Rajender Kishore Singh, (1869) 12 M.I.A. 292, referred to.\nUnder the there is an essential distinc tion between burden of proof as a matter of law and pleading and as a matter of adducing evidence and under section 101 of the 493 Act the burden in the former sense is always on the plaintiff and never shifts, but the burden in the latter sense may according to the evidence led by the parties and presumptions of law or fact raised in their favour.\nSundarji Shivji vs Secretary of State for India, Pat. 752, disapproved.\nKalyani Prasad Singh vs Borrea Coal Co. Ltd., A.I.R. 1946 Cal.\n123, Bank of Bombay vs Fazulbhoy Ebrahim, and Talyarkhan vs Gangadas, Bom.\n848,approved.\nHeld, further, that it is well settled that a map referred to in a lease is a part of the lease.\nWhere, therefore, the map is drawn to scale and clearly demarcates the boundary it is not permissible to ignore it and reconstruct the boundary with reference to the revenue records.\nDarapali Sadagar vs jajir Ahmad, Cal. 394, referred to.", + "1406": "S, employed by the appellant as a cross cutter in the saw mill was asked to show cause why his services should not be terminated on account of grave indiscipline and misconduct and he denied the allegations of fact.\nHe was thereafter informed about a department enquiry to be held against him and was suspended pending enquiry.\nPurporting to act under r. 18(a) of the Standing Orders, the appellant terminated the services of S, without holding any departmental enquiry.\nThe industrial tribunal to which the dispute was referred held, that action taken, after dropping the proposed departmental proceedings was not bonafide and was a colourable exercise of the powerconferred under r. 18(a) of the Standing order and since no attempt was made before it to defend such action by proving the alleged misconduct, it passed an order for reinstatement of S, The appellant contended that as the termination was strictly in accordance with the terms of contract under r. 18(a) of the Standing Orders, it was entitled to dispense 823 with the service of an employee at any time by first giving 14 days notice or, paying 12 days wages.\n^ Held, that the employer 's decision to discharge the employee under r. 18(a) of the Standing Orders after dropping the enquiry intended to be held for misconduct was clearly a colourable exercise of the power, and an employer could not press his right purely on contract and say that under the contract he has unfettered right \"to hire and fire\" his employees, right was subject to industrial adjudication and even a power like that granted by r. 18(a) of the Standing orders in this case was subject to the scrutiny of industrial courts.\nEven in a case of this kind the requirement of bona fides was essential and if the termination of service was a colourable exercise of power, or was a result of victimisation or unfair labour practice, the tribunal had jurisdiction to intervene and set aside such termination.\nBuckingham and Carnatic Co. Ltd. vs Workers of the Company, , referred to.\nThe Chartered Bank Bombay vs The Chartered Bank Employees Union. ; and Assam Oil Company vs Its Workmen, [1960] 3 S.C.R. 457, followed.\nHeld, further, that the principle relating to termination of Government service stands on an entirely different footing as compared to industrial employees and the same principle could not be applied to industrial adjudication.\nParshotaa Lal Dhingra vs Union of India, ; , distinguished.", + "2627": "R and F who held a cinema building in Ahmedabad on lease entered on November 27, 1954 into an agreement with respondent No. 1 giving the latter a right to exhibit cinematograph films in the said building.\nLater respondent No. 1 filed 'suit No. 149 of 1960 to assert his right to exhibit films in the building.\nThe suit resulted in a compromise decree.\nIn pursuance of the compromise a further agreement dated December 1, 1960 was executed between the parties.\nHowever in 1963 respondent No. 1 again filed a suit claiming as a sub lessee or as lessee a right to exhibit films in the said building and praying that the defendants be restrained from interfering with that right.\nThe suit was filed under section 28 of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 in the Court of Small Causes.\nIn this suit respondent No. 1 asked the court to try additional issues Nos. 11, 12 and 13 as preliminary issues.\nIn issue No. 11 the question raised was whether the consent decree in the earlier suit operated as res judicata so that R & F could not question that the agreements between them and respondent No. 1 constituted a lease.\nIssue No. 12 raised the question whether in view of the consent decree R & F were estopped from leading evidence and asking questions in cross examination to show that the said agreements did not constitute a lease.\nIssue No. 13 raised the question whether section 92 of the Indian Evidence Act debarred R & F from leading evidence to the effect that the documents in question did not constitute a lease.\nThe Trial Court refused to try these as preliminary issues and its order was upheld by the High Court.\nAt the hearing of the case when the counsel for the defendants sought to ask a witness for respondent No. 1 whether the agreement dated November 27, 1954 was a commercial transaction and not a lease respondent No. 1 objected to the question.\nThe objection was disallowed by the trial court.\nIn revision under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure the High Court did not interfere with the trial court 's order in respect of issues Nos. 12 and 13.\nIn respect of issue No. 11, the High Court held that the agreement dated November 27, 1954 must in view of the consent decree in suit No. 149 of 1960 be held to be a lease, and that the consent decree created a bar of res judicata in respect of the issue whether the said agreement created a lease.\nThe defendants appellants appealed to this Court.\nHELD : (i) The High Court had no jurisdiction to record any finding on the issue of res judicata in a revision application filed against an order refusing to uphold an objection to certain question asked to a witness under examination.\nThe Court erred in proceeding to decide matters on which no decision was till then recorded by the trial court and which could not be decided by the High Court until the parties had opportunity of leading evidence thereon.\n(ii) By ordering that a question may properly be put to a witness who was examined, no case was decided by the Trial Court within the meaning of section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure.\nThe expression 'case ' is not limited in its import to the entirety of the matter in dispute in a proceeding.\nSuch an interpretation may result in certain cases in denying relief to the aggrieved litigant where it is most needed.\nBut equally, it is not every order of the court in the course of a suit that amounts to a case decided.\nA case may be said to be decided only if the court adjudicates, for the purpose of the suit, some right or obligation of the parties in controversy.\n[441H 442C] Major section section Khanna vs Brig.\nF. J, Dillon, [1964] 4 S.C.R. 409, referred to.\n(iii) A consent decree, according to the decisions of this Court, does not operate as res judicata, because a consent decree is merely the record of a contract between the parties to, a suit, to which is superadded the seal of the court.\nA matter in contest in a suit may operate as res judicata only if there is an adjudication by the court : the terms of section 1 1 of the Code leave no scope for a contrary view.\n[441E]", + "6270": "Pursuant to a scheme enacted for the benefit of ex military officials the appellant State appointed the re spondent on 20.8.1979 as Secretary Zila Sainik Board on contract basis for a specified period which was further extended upto 30.8.1985.\nOn 29.3.1985 the services of the respondent were terminated.\nThe respondent filed a writ petition before the High Court challenging the termination order.\nBy an order dated 24.3.1988 the High Court set aside the termination order holding that the respondent was entitled to salary upto the period he was entitled to remain in service i.e. upto 30.8.1985.\nThe respondent preferred a Review Petition before the High Court contending that pursuant to the interim order dated 10.7.1986 passed by the High Court he was entitled to be reinstated in service even though there was no order of extension of service.\nBy an order dated 26.7.1988, the High Court allowed the Review Petition directing the appellant State to reinstate the respondent in service.\nHence this appeal by the State.\nAllowing the appeal and setting aside the order passed on Review, this Court, HELD: 1.\nIn the instant case, the appointment of the respondent was indisputably in the nature of contract and under tile order of appointment he was entitled to continue in office in the post in question till 30th of August, 1985 and not beyond that date unless there was a further exten sion.\nSince no order of extension had been sanctioned by 240 the Governor beyond 30th August, 1985 the respondent was entitled to the salary and allowances due to him till 30th of August, 1985 if tile order of termination of service was found to be an invalid one.\n[242B; 244C] 1.1 The High Court was right in disposing of the Writ Petition on 24.3.1988 declaring that the respondent was entitled to salary upto the period he was entitled to remain in service, i.e. 30th August, 1985.\nBut it was not right in making an order on Review on 26.7.1988 relying upon the interim order dated 10.7.1986 which ' in the circumstances could not have the effect of controlling the jurisdiction of the High Court to dispose of the Writ Petition on merits as it did on 24.3.1988.\n[245A B] 2.\nThe interim order passed by the High Court did not and could not amount to a direction that the respondent was entitled to be reinstated in service irrespective of the merits of the case and the extent of his right.\nThe order passed on review is wholly unsustainable.\n[245C]", + "3924": "The appellant was charged with the offence of committing the murder of his wife.\nThe trial court acquitted him on the ground that the prosecution had failed to establish any motive for the offence, that the evidence of the prosecution witnesses was discrepant, conflicting and improbable and that when two views were possible on the basis of two divergent versions given by the prosecution and the defence, the benefit of doubt should be given to the accused.\nThe High Court reversed the order of acquittal and convicted and sentenced the appellant to imprisonment for life on the view that the trial court had magnified the importance to be attached to the discrepancies which were of a minor nature In appeal to this Court it was contended on behalf of the appellant that in all cases where two views of the evidence were possible the accused was entitled to the benefit of doubt arising from the two views and that on this principle the High Court should not have interfered with the order of acquittal merely because another view was also possible.\nDismissing the appeal: ^ HELD : (1) Where the trial court allows itself to be beset with fanciful doubts, rejects creditworthy evidence for slender reasons and takes a view of the evidence which is but barely possible, it is the obvious duty of the High Court to interfere in the interest of justice, lest the administration of justice be brought to ridicule.\n[370D] (2) After the decision of this Court in Sanwat Singh vs State of Rajasthan ; this Court has consistently recognised the right of the appellate court to review the entire evidence and to come to its own conclusion bearing in mind the considerations mentioned by the Privy Council in Sheo Swarup vs Emperor (61 T.A. 389).\nOccasionally phrases like \"manifestly illegal\", \"grossly unjust have been used to describe the orders of acquittal which warrant interference.\nBut such expressions have been used more as flourishes of language to emphasise the reluctance of the appellate court to interfere with an order of acquittal than to curtail the power of the appellate court to review the entire evidence and to come to its own conclusion.\nIn two other cases it has been held that to the principles laid down in Sanwat Singh 's case may added the further principle that if two 364 reasonable conclusions could be reached on the basis of the evidence on record the appellate court should not disturb the finding of the trial court.\nThis principle stems out of the fundamental principle of our criminal jurisprudence that the accused is entitled to the benefit of any reasonable doubt.\nIf two reasonably probable and evenly balanced views of the evidence are possible one must necessarily concede the existence of a reasonable doubt.\nBut fanciful and remote possibilities must be left out of account.\nTo entitle an accused person to the benefit of a doubt arising from the possibility of duality of views, the possible view in favour of the accused must be as nearly reasonably probable as that against him.\nIf the preponderance of probability is all one way, a bare possibility of another view will not entitle the accused to claim the benefit of any doubt.\nIt is, therefore essential that, any view of the evidence in favour of the accused must be reasonable even as any doubt, the benefit of which an accused person may claim, must be reasonable.\nA reasonable doubt does not mean some light, airy, insubstantial doubt that may flit through the mind of a Judge about almost anything at any time or other, it does not mean a doubt begotten by sympathy out of reluctance to convict, it means a real doubt, a doubt founded upon reason.\n\"Proof beyond a reasonable doubt\" does not mean proof beyond a shadow of doubt The law would fail to protect the community if it admitted fanciful possibilities to deflect the course of justice.\nIf the evidence is so strong against a man be to leave only a remote possibility in his favour which can be dismissed with the sentence, \"of course it is possible but not in the least probable,\" the case is proved beyond reasonable doubt but nothing short of that will suffice.\n[369A G] Sanwat Singh vs State of Rajasthan, ; applied.\nRamabhupala Reddy & Ors.\nvs The State of A.P., AIR 1971 SC 460, Bhim Singh Rup Singh vs State of Maharashtra, AIR 1974 SC 286, Miller vs Minister of Pensions, [1947] 2 All.\nE.R. 372; Khem Karam & Ors.\nvs State of U.P. & Anr., referred to.", + "6778": "A complaint against the appellant, a former Chief Jus tice of a High Court, was made to the CBI on which a case under section 5(2) read with section 5( I )(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 was registered on 24.2.1976.\nOn 28.2.1976 the F.I.R. was filed in the court of Special Judge.\nThe appellant proceeded on leave from 9.3.1976 and retired 8.4.1976 on attaining the age of superannuation.\nThe investigation culminated in the filing of charge sheet/final report under section 173(2), Cr.\nP.C. against the appellant on 15.12.1977 before the Special Judge.\nThe Charge sheet stated that the appellant after assum ing office of the Chief Justice on 1.5.1969 gradually com menced accumulation of assets and was in possession of pecuniary resources and property, in his name and in the names of his wife and two sons, disproportionate to his known sources of income for the period between the date of his appointment as Chief Justice and the date of registra tion of the case, and thereby he committed the offence of criminal misconduct under section 5( 1 )(e), punishable under section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947.\nThe Special judge issued process for appearance of the appellant.\nMean while, the appellant moved the High Court under section 482, Cr.\nP.C. to quash the said criminal proceedings.\nThe matter was heard by a Full Bench of the High Court which dismissed the application by 2:1 majority; but granted a certificate under Articles 132(1) and 134(1)(c) of the Constitution in view of the important question of law in volved.\nIn appeal to this Court it was contended by the appel lant that the provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 do not apply to a judge of a superior Court as for such prosecution previous sanction of an authority competent to remove a public servant as provided under section 6 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 is imperative and power to remove a Judge is not vested in any single individual authority but is 191 vested in the two Houses of Parliament and the President under Article 124(4) of the Constitution; that the Parlia ment cannot be the sanctioning authority for the purpose of section 6 and if the President is regarded as the authority, he cannot act independently as he exercises his powers by and with the advice of his Council of Ministers and the Execu tive may 'misuse the power by interfering with the judici ary; that section 6 applies only in cases where there is master and servant relationship between the public servant and the authority competent to remove him, and where there is verti cal hierarchy of public offices and the sanctioning authori ty.\nis vertically superior in the hierarchy in which office of the public servant against whom sanction is sought ex ists; that no prosecution can be launched against a Judge of a superior Court under the provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act except in the mode envisaged by Article 124(4) of the Constitution; that no law prohibits a public servant having in his possession assets disproportionate to his known sources of income and such possession becomes an offence only when the public servant is unable to account for it; and that the public servant is entitled to an oppor tunity by the investigating officer to explain dispropor tionality between the assets and the known sources of income and the charge sheet must contain such an averment, and failure to mention that requirement would vitiate the charge sheet and render it invalid and, no offence under section 5(1)(e) of the Act could be made out.\nOn the questions: (1) whether a Judge of a High Court or of the Supreme Court is a 'public servant ' within the mean ing of section 2 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947; (2) whether a Judge of the High Court including the Chief Jus tice, or a Judge of the Supreme Court can be prosecuted for an offence under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947; and (3) who is the competent authority to remove a Judge either of the Supreme Court or of the High Court from his office in order to enable that authority to grant sanction for prose cution of the Judge under the provisions of section 6 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947.\nDismissing the appeal, this Court, HELD: (Per Majority Ray, Shetty, Sharma and Venkatachaliah, JJ).\nA Judge of a High Court or of the Supreme Court is a 'public servant ' within the meaning of section 2 of the Preven tion of Corruption Act, 1947.\nProsecution of a Judge of a High Court, including the Chief 192 Justice, or a Judge of the Supreme Court can be launched after obtaining sanction of the competent authority as envisaged by section 6 of the Prevention of Corruption Act.\nPer Verma, J. (dissenting) 1.\n(i) A Judge or Chief Justice of a High Court is a Constitutional functionary, even though he holds a public office and in that sence he may be included in the wide definition of a public servant.\nBut a public servant whose category for the grant of sanction for prosecution is not envisaged by section 6 of the Act is outside the purview of the Act, not intended to be covered by the Act.\n1(ii) The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, as amended by the 1964 amendment is inapplicable to Judges of the High Courts and the Supreme Court.\n(Per Majority Ray, Shetty and Venkatachaliah, JJ.) 3.1 For the purpose of section 6(1)(c) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, the President of India is the authori ty competent to give previous sanction for prosecution of a Judge of a superior Court.\n3.2 No criminal case shall be registered under section 154, Cr.\nP.C. against a Judge of the High Court, Chief Justice of the High Court or a Judge of the Supreme Court unless the Chief Justice of India is consulted in the matter.\n3.3 If the Chief Justice of India himself is the person against whom the allegations of criminal misconduct are received, the Government shall consult any other judge or Judges of the Supreme Court.\n3.4 There shall be similar consultation at the stage of examining the question of granting sanction for prosecution and it shall be necessary and appropriate that the question of sanction be guided by and in accordance with the advice of the Chief Justice of India.\nSharma.\nJ. (contra) As to who is precisely the authority for granting previ ous sanction for prosecution of a Judge is a matter which did not arise in the instant case and will have to be final ly decided when it directly arises.\nHow 193 ever, the issues of removal under article 124(4) of the Consti tution and sanction under section 6 of the Act can be combined for getting clearance from the Parliament.\nVerma.\nJ. (dissenting) 3.\nSection 6 of the Act is inapplicable to Judges of High Courts or of the Supreme Court and such Constitutional functionaries do not fail within the purview of the Preven tion of Corruption Act, 1947.\nPer B.C. Ray, J. 1.\nA Judge of the High Court or of the Supreme Court comes within the definition of public servant under section 2 of the Prevention of corruption Act, 1947.\nand he is liable to be prosecuted under the provisions of the Act.\n[223E F] 2.1 A Judge will be liable for committing criminal misconduct within the meaning of section 5(1)(e) of the Act, if he has in his possession pecuniary resources or property disproportionate to his known sources of income for which he cannot satisfactorily account.\n[217B] 2.2 A Judge of a superior Court will not be immune from prosecution for criminal offences committed during the tenure of his office under the provisions of the Act.\n[223F] 3.1 In order to launch a prosecution against a Judge of a superior Court for criminal misconduct failing under section 5(1)(e) of the Act, previous sanction of the authority competent to remove a Judge, including Chief Justice of a High Court, from his office is imperative.\n[217C D; 221G] 3.2 The President of India has the power to appoint as well as to remove a Judge from his office on the ground of proved misbehaviour or incapacity as provided in Article 124 of the Constitution and, therefore he, being the authority competent to appoint and to remove a Judge, of course, in accordance with the procedure envisaged in clauses(4) and (5) of Article 124. may be deemed to be the authroity to grant sanction for prosecution of a Judge under the provi sions of section 6(1)(c) in respect of the offences provided in section 5(1)(e) of the Act.\n[225G H; 226A B] 3.3 In order to adequately protect a Judge from frivo lous prosecution and unnecessary harassment the President will consult the Chief Justice of India who will consider all the materials placed before 194 him and tender his advice to the President for giving sanc tion to launch prosecution or for filing FIR against the Judge concerned after being satisfied in the matter.\nThe President shall act in accordance with the advice given by the Chief Justice of India.\n[226B C] If the Chief Justice of India is of opinion that it is not a fit case for grant of sanction for prosecution of the Judge concerned, the President shall not accord sanction to prosecute the Judge.\nThis will save the ,fudge concerned from unnecessary harassment as well as from frivolous prose cution against him.\n[226C] In the case of the Chief justice of the Supreme Court, the President shall consult such of the Judges of the Su preme Court as he may deem fit and proper and shall act in accordance with the advice given to him by the Judge or Judges of the Supreme Court.\n[226D] 3.4 In the instant case, the appellant had resigned from his office and ceased to be a public servant on the date of lodging the F.I.R. against him by the C.B.I. and, therefore, no sanction under section 6(1)(c) of the Act was necessary.\n[227A; 228C] R.S. Nayak vs A.R. Antulay, ; , referred to.\n4.1 A Judge of the Supreme Court as well as a Judge of the High Court is a constitutional functionary and to main tain the independence of the judiciary and to enable the Judge to effectively discharge his duties as a judge and to maintain the rule of law, even in respect of against the Central Government or the State Government, he is made totally independent of the control and influence of the executive by mandatorily embodying in Article 124 or Article 217 of the Constitution that a Judge can only be removed from his office in the manner provided in clauses (4) and (5) of Article 124.\n[222B D] 4.2 Power to remove by impeachment or address, a person holding office during good behaviour, is an essential coun terpart to the independence secured to the holders of high office by making their tenure one of good behaviour instead of at pleasure.\n[224D E] 4.3 A Judge of the Supreme Court or of the High Court can only be removed on the ground of proved misbehaviour or incapacity by an order of the President passed after follow ing the mandatory procedure expressly laid down in Article 124(4) of the Constitution.\nWithout an address by each of the Houses of the Parliament, the President is not 195 empowered under the Constitution to order removal of a Judge of the Supreme Court or of the High Court from his office on the ground of proved misbehaviour or incapacity.\nTherefore, the repository of this power is not in the President alone but it is exercised after an address by each of the Houses of Parliament in the manner provided in Article 124(4).\n[218B H; 219A] Union of India vs Sakalchand, ; and S.P. Gupta and Ors.\nvs President of India and Ors, AIR 1982 SC 149, referred to.\nThere is no master and servant relationship or employer and employee relationship between a Judge and the President of India in whom the executive power of the Union is vested under the provisions of Article 53 of the Consti tution.\n[222E] 6.\nIt is necessary to evolve some method commensurate with the grant of sanction in cases of serious allegations of corruption and acquisition or the possession of dispro portionate assets which the Judge cannot satisfactory ac count for or possession of property disproportionate to the sources of income of the Judge.\nOtherwise, it will create a serious inroad on the dignity, respect and credibility and integrity of the high office which a superior ,fudge occu pies resulting in the erosion of the dignity and respect for the high office of the Judges in the estimation of the public.\n[225E F] 7.1 The purpose of grant of previous sanction before prosecuting a public servant including a Judge of the High Court or of the Supreme Court is to protect the Judge from unnecessary harassment and frivolous prosecution more par ticularly to save the Judge from the biased prosecution for giving judgment in a case which goes against the Government or its officers though based on good reasons and rule of law.\n[226D E] 7.2 Frivolous prosecution cannot be launched against a Judge for giving a judgment against the Central Government or any of its officers inasmuch as such decision does not amount to misbehaviour within the meaning of Article 124 of the Constitution.\n[226G H] Shamsher Singh & Ant.\nvs State of Punjab, ; and G.K. Daphtary vs\nO.P. Gupta; , , re ferred to.\nPer Shetty, and Venkatachaliah, JJ.\n196 1.\nThe expression \"public servant\" as defined under section 2 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 means a public serv ant as defined in section 21, I.P.C.\nFrom the very commencement of the I.P.C. \"Every Judge\" finds a place in the categories of public servant defined under section 21 and this expression indicates all Judges and all Judges of all Courts.\nIt is a general term and general term in the Act should not be narrowly construed.\nIt must receive comprehensive meaning unless there is positive indication to the contrary.\nThere is no such indication to the contrary in the Act.\nA Judge of the superior Court cannot therefore excluded from the defi nition of 'public servant '.\n[237C; 240D; 242A B] 2.1 A public servant cannot be prosecuted for offences specified in section 5 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, unless there is prior sanction under section 6 for prosecution from the competent authority.\n[237E] 2.2 There are two requirements for the applicability of clause (c) of section 6(1) to a Judge of the higher judiciary the Judge must be a public servant, and there must be an authority competent to remove him from his of fice.\nIf these two requirements are complied with, a Judge cannot escape from the operation of the Act.\n[240B C] 2.3 The Judges are liable to be dealt with just the same way as any other person in respect of criminal offence.\nIt is only in taking of bribes or with regard to the offence of corruption the sanction for criminal prosecution is re quired.\nThere is no law providing protection for Judges from criminal prosecution.\n[252A B] It is not objectionable to initiate criminal proceedings against public servant before exhausting the disciplinary proceedings, and a fortiori, the prosecution of a Judge for criminal misconduct before his removal by Parliament for proved misbehaviour is unobjectionable.\n[252D E] The \"proved misbehaviour\" which is the basis for removal of a Judge under clause (4) of Article 124 of the Constitu tion may also in certain cases involve an offence of crimi nal misconduct under section 5(1) of the Act.\nBut that is no ground for withholding criminal prosecution till the Judge is removed by Parliament.\nOne is the power of Parliament and the other is the jurisdiction of a criminal court.\nBoth are mutually exclusive.\n[251A C] 3.1 For the purpose of section 6(1)(c) of the Act, the President of India the authority competent to give previous sanction for the prosecution 197 of a Judge of the Supreme Court and the High Court.\n3.2 Section 6(1) brings within its fold all the catego ries of public servants as defined in section 21 of the I.P.C. Clauses (a) and (b) would cover the cases of public servants who are employed in connection with the affairs of the Union or State and are not removable from their office save by or with the sanction of the respective government.\nClause (c) states that in the case of any other person the sanction would be of the authority competent to remove him from his office.\n[238E F] The provisions of clauses (a) and (b) of section 6 [(1)] cover certain categories of public servants and the 'other ' which means remaining categories are brought within the scope of clause (c).\nClause (c) is independent of and sepa rate from the preceding two clauses.\nThe structure of the section does not permit the applicability of the rule of ejusdem generis.\n[240A B] 3.3 The application of the ejusdem generis rule is only to general word following words which are less general, or the general word following particular and specific words of the same nature.\nIn such a case, the general word or expres sion is to be read as comprehending only things of the same kind as that designated by the preceding specific words or expressions.\nThe general word is presumed to be restricted to the same genus as those of the particular and specific words.\n[239F G] 3.4 The construction which would promote the general legislative purpose underlying the provision, is to be preferred to a construction which would not.\n[247A] If the literal meaning of the legislative language used would lead to results which would defeat the purpose of the Act, the Court would be justified in disregarding the liter al meaning and adopt a liberal construction which effectu ates the object of the legislature.\n[247A B] S.A. Venkataraman vs The State, ; and M. Narayanan vs State of Kerala, ; , referred to.\nCraies on Statute Law, (6th Edn.\np. 531) referred to.\n3.5 In view of the composition of Parliament, the nature of transacting business or proceeding in each House, the prohibition by Article 121 on discussion with respect to the conduct of any Judge of the Supreme Court or of a High Court, in the discharge of his duties except 198 upon a motion for presenting an address to the President praying for his removal, the Parliament cannot be the proper authority for granting sanction for the prosecution of a Judge, That does not, however, follow that the Judges of superior Courts are entitled to be excluded from the scope of the Act.\n[245C F] 3.6 Section 6 requires to be liberally construed.\nIt is not a penal provision but a measure of protection to public servants in the penal enactment.\nIt indicates the authori ties without whose sanction a public servant cannot be prosecuted.\nIt is sufficient that the authorities prescribed thereunder fail within the fair sense of the language of the section.\n[247B C] The expression \"the authority competent to remove\" used in section 6(1)(c) is to be construed to mean also an authority without whose order or affirmation the public servant cannot be removed.\nThe order of the President for removal of a Judge is mandatory.\nThe motion passed by each House of Parliament with the special procedure prescribed under article 124(4) will not proprio vigore operate against the Judge.\nIt will not have the consequence of removing the Judge from the office unless it is followed by an order of the President.\nClause (4) of article 124 is in the negative terms.\nThe order of the President is sine qua non for removal of a Judge.\nThe President alone could make that order.\n[247C E, 248C] 3.7 The relationship of master and servant as is ordi narily understood in common law does not exist between the Judges of higher judiciary and the Government.\nThe Judges are not bound nor do they undertake to obey any order of the Government within the scope of their duties.\nIndeed, they are not Judges if they allow themselves to be guided by the Government in the performance of their duties.\n[239B D] Union of India vs H.S. Seth, ; , referred to.\n3.8 It is not necessary that the authority competent to give sanction for prosecution or the authority competent to remove the public servant should be vertically superior in the hierarchy in which the office of the public servant exists.\nThere is no such requirement under section 6 of the Act.\nThe power to give sanction for prosecution can be conferred on any authority.\nSuch authority may be of the department in which the public servant is working or an outside authority.\nAll that is required is that the authority must be in a position to appreciate the materials collected against the public servant to judge whether the prosecution contemplated is frivolous or speculative.\n[249B C] 199 R.S. Nayak vs A.R. Antulay, , distinguished.\nThe President is not an outsider so far judiciary is concerned.\nHe appoints the Judges of the High Court and the Supreme Court in exercise of his executive powers.\n[249E] Shamsher Singh vs State of Punjab, [1975] 1 SCR 365 and S.P. Gupta vs Union of India, [1982] 2 SCR 365, referred to.\nParliament has no part to play in the matter of appoint ment of Judges except that the Executive is responsible to the Parliament.\n[249G H] 3.9 In the instant case, the view taken by the High Court that no sanction for prosecution of the appellant under section 6 of the Act was necessary since he had retired from the service on the age of superannuation and was not a public servant on the date of filing the charge sheet, is unassailable.\nThe question is no longer res integra.\n[254G H; 255C] S.A. Venkataraman vs The State, ; ; C.R. Bansi vs State of Maharashtra, ; and K.S. Dharmadatan vs Central Government & Ors., ; , referred to.\nR.S. Nayak & Ors vs\nA.R. Antulay, , referred to.\n4.1 There are various protections afforded to Judges to preserve the independence of the judiciary.\nThey have pro tection from civil liability for any act done or ordered to be done by them in discharge of their judicial duty whether or not such judicial duty is performed within the limits of their jurisdiction, as provided under section 1 of .\nLikewise section 77, I.P.C. gives them protection from criminal liability for an act performed judicially.\nA discussion on the conduct of the Judges of the Supreme Court and the High Courts in the discharge of their duties shall not take place in Parliament or in the State Legislatures, as envisaged by Articles 121 and 211 of the Constitution.\nThe Supreme Court and the High Courts have been constituted as Courts of Record with the power to punish for committing contempt as laid down by Articles 129 and 215.\nThe provides power to take civil and criminal contempt proceedings.\nThe Executive is competent to appoint the Judges but not empowered to remove them.\nThe power to remove is vested in Parliament by the process analogous to impeachment as envisaged by Article 124 of the Constitution.\n[251E H; 242E] 200 4.2 Previous sanction of the competent authority as contem plated by section 6 is only to protect the honest public servants from frivolous and vexatious prosecution.\nThe competent authority may refuse sanction for prosecution if the offence alleged has no material to support or it is frivolous or intended to harass the honest officer.\nBut he is duty bound to grant sanction if the material collected lend credence to the offence complained of the discretion to prosecute a public servant is taken away from the prosecuting agency and is vested in the authority competent to remove the public servant.\nThe latter would be in a better position than the prosecuting agency to assess the material collected in a dispassionate and reasonable manner and determine whether or not the sanction for prosecution deserves to be granted.\n[237F G; 238A C] 4.3 The apprehension, that the Executive being the largest litigant is likely to misuse the power to prosecute the Judges, in our overlitigious society is pot unjustified or unfounded.\nThe Act provides certain safeguards like section 6 and trial by the court which is independent of the Executive.\nBut these safeguards may not be adequate.\nAny complaint against a Judge and its investigation by the CBI, if given publicity, will have a far reaching impact on the Judge and the litigant public.\nThe need therefore is a judicious use of taking action under the Act.\nCare should be taken that honest and fearless Judges are not harassed.\nThey should be protected.\n[252G H; 253A C] 5.1 There is no need for a separate legislation for the Judges.\nThe Act is not basically defective in its applica tion to judiciary.\nAll that is required is to lay down certain guidelines lest the Act may be misused.\nThis Court being the ultimate guardian of rights of people and inde pendence of the judiciary will not deny itself the opportu nity to lay down such guidelines.\nThis Court is not a Court of limited jurisdiction of only dispute settling.\nAlmost from the beginning, this Court has been a law maker, albiet, 'interstitial ' law maker.\nIndeed the Court 's role today is much more.\nIt is expanding beyond dispute settling and interstitial law making.\nIt is a problem solver in the nebulous areas.\n[253E G] 5.2 The Chief Justice of India is a participatory func tionary in the matter of appointment of Judges of the Su preme Court and the High Courts; he is to be consulted by the President of India even for transfer of a Judge from one High Court to another; and question of age of a Judge of a High Court shall be decided by the President after consult ing him.\nThe Chief Justice of India being the head of the Judiciary is primarily concerned with the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.\nHence it is necessary that the Chief Justice of India is not 203 either from the evidence of the prosecution and/or evidence from the defence.\n[259F G] 8.3 Parliament is competent to place the burden on certain aspects on the accused as well and particularly in matters \"especially within his knowledge\".\n(section 106 of the Evidence Act).\nAdroitly the prosecution cannot, in the very nature of things, be expected to know the affairs of a public servant found in possession of resources of property disproportionate to his known sources of income.\nIt is for him to explain.\nSuch a statute placing burden on the accused cannot be regarded as unreasonable, unjust, or unfair.\nNor can it be regarded as contrary to Article 21 of the Consti tution.\nThe principle that the burden of proof is always on the prosecution and never shifts to the accused is not a universal rule to be followed in every case.\nThe principle is applied only in the absence of statutory provision to the contrary.\n[260A C] Woolmington vs Director of Public Prosecution, [1935] A .C. 462; C.S.D. Swamy vs The State, ; ; Surajpal Singh vs The State of U.P., ; ; Sajjan Singh vs The State of Punjab, ; ; Rig vs Hunt, and Maharashtra vs K.K.S. Ramas wamy; , , referred to.\nState of Maharashtra vs Wasudeo Ramchandra Kaidalwar, ; , referred to.\n9.1 To state that after collection of all material, the investigating officer must give an opportunity to the ac cused and call upon him to account for the excess of the assets over the known sources of income and then decide whether the accounting is satisfactory or not, would be elevating him to the position of an enquiry officer or a judge.\nHe is not holding an enquiry against the conduct of the public servant or determining the disputed issues re garding the disproportionality between the assets and the income of the accused.\nHe just collects material from all sides and prepares a report which he files in the Court as a chargesheet.\nThe investigating officer is only required to collect material to find out whether the offence alleged appears to have been committed.\nIn the course of the inves tigation, he may examine the accused.\nIndeed, fair investi gation requires that the accused should not be kept in darkness.\nHe should be taken into confidence if he is will ing to cooperate.\n[261B E] 10.1 The charge sheet is nothing but a final report of the police officer under section 173(2) of the Cr.\nP.C. Section 173(2) provides that on 204 completion of the investigation the police officer investi gating into a cognizable Offence shall submit a report, which must be in the form prescribed by the State Govern ment.\nThe statutory requirement of the report under section 173(2) would be complied with if the various details pre scribed therein are included in the report and it accompa nies all the documents and statements of witnesses as re quired by section 172(5) Cr.\nP.C. Nothing more need be stated in the report of the investigating officer.\nIt is also not necessary that all the details of the offence must be stat ed.\nThe details of the offence are required to be proved to bring home the guilt of the accused at a later stage in the course of the trial of the case by adducing acceptable evidence.\n[261E H; 262A C] Satya Narain Musadi and Ors.\nvs State of Bihar, , referred to.\n10.2 In the instant case, the charge sheet contained all the requirements of section 173(2), Cr.\nIt stated that the investigation showed that between 1.5.1969 and 24.2.1976 the appellant had been in possession of the pecuniary resources and property in his own name and in the names of his wife and two sons, which were disproportionate to the known sources of income over the same period and he cannot satis factorily account for such disproportionate pecuniary re sources and property.\nThe details of properties and pecuni ary resources of the appellant also were set out in clear terms.\nNo more was required to be stated in the charge sheet.\nIt was fully in accordance with the terms of section 173(2), Cr.\nP.C. and clause (e) ors.\n5(1)(e) of the Act.\n[262C E] 11.\nThe society 's demand for honesty in a Judge is exacting and absolute.\nThe standards of judicial behaviour, both on and off the Bench, are normally extremely high.\nFor a judge to deviate from such standards of honesty and impar tiality is to betray the trust reposed on him.\nNo excuse or no legal relativity can condone such betrayal.\nFrom the standpoint of justice the size of the bribe or scope of corruption cannot be the scale for measuring a judge 's dishonour.\nA single dishonest judge not only dishonours himself and disgraces his office but jeopardises the integ rity of the entire judicial system.\n[262F H; 263A] A judicial scandal has always been regarded as far more deplorable than a scandal involving either the Executive or a member of the Legislature.\nThe slightest hint of irregu larity or impropriety in the Court is a cause for great anxiety and alarm.\n[263A B] Per Sharma, J.: 1.\nThe expression \"public servant\" used in the Prevention of 205 Corruption Act, 1947 is undoubtedly wide enough to denote every Judge, including the Judges of the High Courts and the Supreme Court [263D] 2.1 Section 2 of the Act adopts the definition of \"public servant\" as given in section 21, I.P.C. which includes \"Every Judge\".\nIf the legislature had intended to exclude Judges of the High Courts and the Supreme Court from the field of section 5 of the Act, it could have said so in unambigu ous terms instead of adopting the wide meaning of the ex pression \"public servant\" as given in the Indian Penal Code.\n[266E F] 2.2 No person is above the law.\nIn a proceeding under Article 124 of the Constitution, a Judge can merely be removed from his office.\nHe cannot be convicted and pun ished.\nIn a case where there is a positive finding recorded in such a proceeding against the Judge and on that ground he is removed from his office, it cannot be said that he will escape the criminal liability.\nIn a civilised society the law cannot be assumed to be leading to such disturbing results.\n[265G; 266A B] 2.3 It is not safe to assume that the Prevention of Corruption Act intended to make in its application any discrimination between the lower and the higher judiciary.\nThere cannot be any rational ground on the basis of which a member of a higher judiciary may be allowed to escape prose cution while in identical circumstances a member of the subordinate judiciary is tried and convicted.\nSuch an inter pretation of the Act will militate against its constitution al validity and should not, therefore, be preferred.\n[265C E] 3.1 The power to remove a High Court Judge from his office does exist and has to be exercised in appropriate circumstances according to the provisions of Article |24 of the Constitution.\nIt cannot, therefore be said that previous sanction for his prosecution cannot be made available.\n[266D E] 3.2 Section 6(1)(c) of the Act speaks of the \"authority competent to remove\" the public servant \"from his office\".\nAn answer in the negative to the question as to whether there is some authority competent to remove a Judge of a High Court will be inconsistent with Article 124 clauses (4) and (5) read with Article 218 of the Constitution.\nAlthough more than one person are involved in the process, it is not permissible to say that no authority exists for the purpose of exercising the power to remove a High Court Judge from his office.\n[264A C] As to who is precisely the authority in this regard is a matter 206 which does not arise in the instant case, but the vital question whether such an authority exists at all must be answered in the affirmative.\n[264C D] 4.1 If the President is held to be the appropriate authority to grant the sanction without reference to the Parliament, he will be bound by the advice he receives from the Council of Ministers.\nThis will seriously jeopardise the independence of judiciary which is undoubtedly a basic feature of the Constitution.\n[267D E] 4.2 Since the Constitution itself has considered it adequate in the matter of dealing with serious accusations against the Judges by incorporating the provisions of clauses (4) and (5) in Article 124, they must be treated to be appropriate and suitable; and should be resorted to in the matter of prosecution also, in view of the Parliament enacting section 6 of the Act in the language which attracts the constitutional ,provisions.\n[268B C] 4.3 It is true that the grant of sanction will be de layed until the accusation is examined according to the law enacted under Clause (5) of Article 124, but once that stage is over and a finding is recorded against the Judge, there should not be any hitch in combining the two matters the removal and the grant of sanction which are obviously inter twined, for getting clearance from Parliament.\n[268E H; 269A] 5.1 Protection to the public servant in general is provided under Article 311 of the Constitution and the interest of the subordinate judiciary is further taken care of by the High Courts, and this alongwith the provisions regarding previous sanction shields them from unjustified prosecution.\nSimilarly, protection is available to the High Court and Supreme Court Judges through the provisions of clauses (4) and (5) of Article 124 of the Constitution.\nSo far this aspect is concerned, the two categories of Judges High Court and Supreme Court Judges on the one hand and the rest on the other have not been treated by the law differently.\n[265C E] 5.2 The protection to the independence of the Judiciary is in section 6 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, which by providing for previous sanction of the authority empowered to remove the Judge, leads to Article 124 of the Constitution.\n[268A B] 6.1 Taking into consideration the independence of Judi ciary as envisaged by the Constitution, if the President of India is treated as the sanctioning authority in the case of a Judge, and the Chief Justice of 207 India is consulted in the matter and steps are taken in accordance with his advice, and the executive follows this rule strictly, a further protection from harassment of the Judges is uncalled for and unjustified criminal prosecution shall be not made available.\nBut such a binding direction cannot be issued by this Court on the basis of the provi sions of the Constitution and the Act.\nThe approval of the Chief Justice of India can be introduced as a condition for prosecution only by the Parliament and not by this Court.\nIf the Court starts supplementing the law as it stands now, it will be encroaching upon the legislative field.\n[266G H; 267A B; F H; 268A] 7.\nSection 5(1)(e) does not contemplate a notice to be served on the accused.\nIf the prosecuting authority after making a suitable enquiry, by taking into account the rele vant documents and questioning relevant persons, forms the opinion that the accused cannot satisfactorily account for the accumulation of disproportionate wealth in his posses sion the section is attracted.\n[269B D] 8.\nIn the instant case, the records clearly indicate that after duly taking all the appropriate steps it was stated that the assets found in the possession of the appel lant in his own name and in the names of his wife and two sons, were disproportionate to his known sources of income during the relevant period and for which he \"cannot satis factorily account\".\n[269D E] Per Verma, J. (dissenting) 1.1 A Judge or Chief justice of a High Court is a Con stitutional functionary, even though he holds a public office and in that sense he may be included in the wide definition of a 'public servant '.\nHowever, the holder of an office who may be a public servant according to the wide definition of the expression in the prevention of corruption Act, but whose category for grant of sanction for prosecu tion is not envisaged by section 6 is outside the purview of the Act, not intended to be covered by the Act.\n[289F; 286D E] 1.2 Section 6(1)(c) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, is inapplicable to a Judge of a High Court or the Supreme Court and such constitutional functionaries do not fall within the purview of the Act.\n[296B] 1.3 Previous sanction under section 6 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, is a condition precedent for taking cognizance of an offence punishable under the Act, of a public servant who is prosecuted during 208 his continuance in the office.\nThe public servant failing within the purview of the Act must invariably fail within one of the three clauses in section 6(1).\nIf the holder of an office, even though a public servant according to the defi nition in the Act does not fail within any of the clauses (a), (b) or (c) of sub section (1), he must be deemed to be outside the purview of the Act since this special enactment was not enacted to cover that category of public servants in spite of the wide definition of 'public servant ' in the Act.\n[286A B] 1.4 Section 6(1)(c) speaks of 'authority competent to remove ', which plainly indicates the substantive competence of the authority to remove, not merely the procedural or formal part of it.\nThe authority itself should be competent to remove or the one to decide the question of removal and not one which merely obeys or implements the decision of some other authority.\nIt contemplates that the removing authority should have the competence to take a decision on the material placed before it for the purpose of deciding whether the public servant, against whom sanction is sought, has been prima facie guilty of abuse of his office so that there is occasion to bring about cessation of interrelation between the office and abuse by the holder of the office by his removal therefrom.\n[291A C] R.S. Nayak vs\nA.R. Antulay, , referred to.\n1.5 The competent sanctioning authority envisaged by section 6( 1 )(c) is a vertical superior in the hierarchy having some power of superintendence over the functioning of the public servant.\nWhere no such relationship exists in the absence of any vertical hierarchy and the holder of the public office is a constitutional functionary not subject to power of superintendence of any superior, section 6 can have no application by virtue of the scheme engrafted therein.\n[291C D] 1.6 Construction of section 6(1)(c) of the Act treating the President as the competent authority to remove a High Court Judge would conflict with the provisions enacted in clauses (4) and (5) of Article 124 read with Article 218 of the Constitution.\nSuch a construction has to be avoided.\n[295B C] 1.7 The Prevention of Corruption Act is wholly workable in its existing form for the public servants within its purview and there is no impediment in its applicability to the large number of public servants who have been dealt with thereunder ever since its enactment.\n[274A] 209 1.8 In view of the special provisions enacted in clauses (4) and (5) of Article 124 read with Article 218 of the Constitution, non application of section 6(1) of the Preven tion of Corruption Act, 1947 to the Constitutional function aries such as Judges of the High Courts and the Supreme Court, would result only in the failure of the attempt to bring them within the purview of the Act, while the Act would continue to apply to the public servants in general who fail within the scheme of section 6 of the Act 1or the pur pose of grant of previous sanction for prosecution which is a condition precedent for cognizance of an offence punisha ble under that Act.\n[295A E] 2.1 The construction made of the provisions of the Act must also fit in within the scheme of clauses (4) and (5) of Article 124 read with Article 218 of the Constitution in order to present a harmonious scheme.\n[294C B] 2.2 There can be no doubt that the expression 'misbeha viour ' is of wide import and includes within its ambit criminal miscondust as defined in sub section (1) of section 5 of the Act as also lesser misconduct of a Judge falling short of criminal misconduct.\nThe special law envisaged by Article 124(5) for dealing with the misbehaviour of a Judge covers the field of 'investigation ' and 'proof ' of the 'misbeha viour and the only punishment provided is by Article 124(4) of removal from office.\n[294D E] 2.3 Article 124(5) of the Constitution is wide enough to include within its ambit every conduct of a Judge amounting to misbehaviour including criminal misconduct and prescribes the procedure for investigation and proof thereof.\n[294E] 2.4 Even for the procedure for investigation into any misbehaviour of a Judge as well as its proof, a law enacted by the Parliament under Article 124(5) is envisaged in the constitutional scheme.\nSuch a law in the form of the and the Rules framed thereunder has been enacted.\nThese provisions were made in the Constitution and the law thereunder enacted when the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 was in the statute book.\n[294F G] 2.5 The prior enactment and existence of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 at the time when clauses (4) and (5) of Article 124 of the Constitution were framed, does indi cate the constitutional scheme that a separate parliamentary law to deal with the investigation and proof of misbehaviour of a Judge was clearly contemplated by providing a special machinery for this category of constitutional func 210 tionaries notwithstanding the general law available and applicable to the public servants in general, which included the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947.\n[294G H; 295A] 2.6 In view of the special provisions in the form of clauses (4) and (5) of Article 124 and Article 218 of the Constitution, and the special enactment by the Parliament under Article 124 (5) provided in the Constitutional scheme for Judges of the High Courts and the Supreme Court, it cannot be said that they are governed by the general provi sions in addition to these special provisions enacted only for them.\nThe need for these special provisions is a clear pointer in the direction of inapplicability to them of the general provisions applicable to the public servants holding other public offices, not as constitutional functionaries.\n[295A B] 2.7 The view that Judges of the High Courts and the Supreme Court are outside the purview of the Prevention of Corruption Act, fits in with the constitutional scheme and is also in harmony with the several nuances of the entire existing law relating to the superior Judges while the contrary view fouls with it at several junctures and leaves many gaping holes which cannot be filled by judicial exer cise.\n[303F G] 2.8 The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, as amended by the 1964 amendment, is inapplicable to Judges of the High Courts and the Supreme Court.\n[304A] $ 84, referred to.\n3.1 There is practical difficulty in applying criminal misconduct, defined in clause (e) of sub section (1) of section 5 of the Act to a Judge of a High Court or the Supreme Court.\n[296C] 3.2 The words in clause (e) of section 5 (1) of the Act have to be given some meaning which would place the burden on the prosecution, howsoever light, to make out a prima facie case for obtaining sanction of the competent authority under section 6 of the Act and this can be done only if it is read as a part of the scheme under which the public servant is required to furnish particulars of his assets with reference to which the disproportion and his inability to satisfactorily ac count can be inferred.\n[297A B] 3.3 While according sanction to prosecute under section 6 of the Act, the competent authority has to satisfy itself about the public servant 's inability to satisfactorily account for possession of disproportionate assets.\nThe competent author ity before granting sanction has to apply 211 its mind and be satisfied about the existence of a prima facie case for prosecution of the public servant on the basis of the material placed before it.\nIn order to form an objective opinion, the competent authority must have before it the version of the public servant on the basis of which the conclusion can be reached whether it amounts to satis factory account or not.\n[296E F] 3.4 The rules applicable to the public servants in general regulating their conduct require them to furnish periodical information of their assets which form a part of their service record.\nIn the case of such public servants whenever sanction to prosecute is sought under section 6, the competent authority can form the requisite opinion on the basis of the available material including the service record of the public servant to code to the conclusion whether the offence under clause (e) of section 5 (1) of possession of dis proportionate assets which the public servant cannot satis factorily account is made outprima facie.\n[296F G, 297C D] 3.5 In the case of Judges of the High Courts and the Supreme Court, there is no requirement under any provision of furnishing particulars of their assets so as to provide a record thereof with reference to which such an opinion can be formed and there is no vertical superior with legal authority enabling obtaining of information from the con cerned Judge.\nThis too is a pointer in the direction that even after the 1964 amendment of the Act the Legislature did not intend to include Judges of the High Courts and the Supreme Court within the purview of the enactment.\n[297D F] 4.1 If the Act is applicable to Judges of the High Courts and the Supreme Court, it is obvious that the same must apply also to the Chief Justice of India, the Comptrol ler and Auditor General and the Chief Election Commissioner.\nIncongruous results would follow in such an event.\n[297F G] 4.2 If the involvement of the Chief Justice of India is necessary even for commencing the investigation into the offence, and the President while granting the sanction under section 6(1)(c) is also assumed to act on the advice of the Chief Justice of India and if it is permissible to do so in the absence of any 'such provision in the Act, the problem would arise where such action is contemplated against the Chief Justice of India himself.\n[297G H; 298A] 4.3 Any provision which cannot apply to the Chief Justice of 212 India, cannot apply to the Judges of the Supreme Court, or for that matter even to the High Court Judges, since the Chief Justice of India is not a vertical superior of any of them, there being no such vertical hierarchy and the Chief Justice of India having no power of superintendence even over the High Court Judges, much less the Supreme Court Judges.\n[298A B] 4.4 In the case of the Comptroller and Auditor General and the Chief Election Commissioner, the situation would be more piquant.\nThe Chief Justice of India cannot be involved in the process relating to them and there is none else to fill that role in that situation.\nThe Constitution, while providing that their position would be akin to that of a Judge of the Supreme Court, could not have intended to place them on a pedestal higher than that of a Supreme Court Judge.\nIf the Act was intended to apply to these constitu tional functionaries, it could not have been enacted leaving such gaping holes which are incapable of being plugged to present a comprehensive scheme for this purpose.\n[298C E] 5.1 The need for sanction under section 6 of the Act for prosecution of the holder of a public office indicates the ambit and scope of the enactment for deciding whether the holder of a public office falls within the purview of the enactment.\nNo sanction for prosecution under section 6 is re quired after the public servant ceases to hold office, but it does not imply that every holder of a public office after ceasing to hold that office is within the purview of the enactment, even though during the tenure in office, only those public servants are within its ambit in whose case sanction under section 6 must be obtained.\n[298F H; 299A] 5.2 The ambit of the enactment is to be determined on the basis of the public office held by the public servant, which office is alleged to have been abused during the tenure for committing the offence of criminal misconduct under the Act and it is not the fact of continuance in that office or ceasing to hold it which decides the ambit of the enactment.\nIf the holder of a public office during his tenure in office cannot be prosecuted without sanction under section 6, then, no sanction for his prosecution after ceasing to hold the office may be necessary, but his prosecution is made because while in office he could be prosecuted with the previous sanction under section 6.\nConversely, if the holder of a public office while continuing in that office could not be prosecuted under this Act on account of inapplicability of section 6 and, therefore, the non feasibility of previous sanc tion for prosecution under section 6, then on his ceasing to hold 213 5.3 It is for the purpose of construing the provisions of the enactment and determining the scope and ambit thereof and for deciding whether the holder of a public office comes within the purview of the enactment that the feasibility of previous sanction for prosecution and applicability of section 6 of the Act is important since it holds the key which unlocks the true vistas of the enactment.\n[299D E] 5.4 The concept of the sanction for prosecution by a superior is so inextricably woven into the fabric of the enactment that the pattern is incomplete without it.\nThe clear legislative intent is that the enactment applies only to those in whose case sanction of this kind is contemplated and those to whom the provision of sanction cannot squarely apply are outside its ambit.\nThe provision for sanction is like the keystone in the march of the enactment.\nRemove the keystone of sanction and the arch crumbles.\n[299E G] R.S. Nayak vs A.R. A ntulay, , dis tinguished.\n6.1 The higher judiciary was treated differently in the Constitution indicating the great care and attention be stowed in prescribing the machinery for making the appoint ments.\nIt was expected that any deviation from the path of rectitude at that level would be a rare phenomenon and for the exceptional situation the provision of removal in ac cordance with clause (4) of Article 124 was made, the diffi culty in adopting that course being itself indicative of the rarity with which it was expected to be invoked.\nIt appears that for a rare aberrant at that level, unless the Judge resigned when faced with such a situation, removal from office in accordance with Article 124(4) was envisaged as the only legal sanction.\nIf this was the expectation of the framers of the Constitution and their vision of the moral fibre in the higher echelons of the judiciary in free India, there is nothing surprising in the omission to bring them within the purview of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, or absence of a similar legislation for them alone.\nThis position continued even during the deliberations of the Santham Committee which clearly mentioned in ics Report submitted in 1964 that it has considered the judiciary outside the ambit for its deliberations.\nClearly, it was expected that the higher judiciary Whose word would be final in the interpretation of all laws including the Constitu tion, will be comprised of men leading in the spirit of self sacrifice concerned more with their obligations then rights, so that there would be no occasion for any one else to sit in judgment over them.\n[305H; 306A D] 6.2 The fact that the Parliament did not enact any other law for 214 the investigation into allegations of corruption against a superior Judge and for his trial and punishment for that offence and rest content merely with enacting the , to provide for the procedure for remov al of a Judge under Article 124 (4) is a clear pointer in the direction that the Parliament has not as yet considered it expedient to enact any such law for the trial and punish ment on the charge of corruption of a superior Judge, except by his removal from office in the manner prescribed.\nThe provisions of the , provide the procedure for investigation and proof of an allegation of corruption against a superior Judge and if the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 is held applicable to them, then there would be two separate procedures under these two enactments providing for investigation into the same charge.\nThis anomaly and incongruity cannot be attributed to a conscious act of the Parliament while enacting , after the 1964 amendment in the Prevention of Corruption Act.\n[301D F] 7.1 The constitutional functionaries namely Judges of High Courts, Judges of the Supreme Court, the Comptroller and Auditor General and the Chief Election Commissioner were never intended to fall within the ambit of the Act as ini tially enacted in 1947, when provisions similar to Articles 124(4) and (5) of the Constitution were present in the Government of India Act, 1935, nor was any such attempt made by amendment of the Prevention of Corruption Act in 1964 and the same position continues in the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.\n[300A B] 7.2 If there is now a felt need to provide for such a situation, the remedy lies in suitable parliamentary legis lation for the purpose preserving the independence of judi ciary free from likely executive influence while providing a proper and adequate machinery for investigation into allega tions of corruption against such constitutional function aries and for their trial and punishment after the investi gation.\nThe remedy is not to extend the existing law and make it workable by reading into it certain guidelines for which there is no basis in it, sing the Act was not intended to apply to them.\n[300B C] 7.3 The test of applicability of the existing law would be the legal sanction and justiciability of the proposed guidelines without which it is unworkable in the case of such persons.\nIn fact, the very need to read the proposed guidelines in the existing law by implication is a clear indication that the law as it exists does not apply to them.\nMaking the law applicable with the aid of the suggested guidelines, is not in the domain of judicial craftsmanship, but a naked usurpation of legislative power in a virgin field.\n[300C D] 215 8.1 Laying down guidelines to be implicitly obeyed, if they find no place in the existing enactment and to bring the superior Judges within the purview of the existing law on that basis would amount to enacting a new law outside the scope of the existing law and not merely construing it by supplying the deficiencies to make it workable for achieving the object of its enactment.\n[273E F] S.P. Sampath Kumar vs Union of India, ; , distinguished.\n8.2 In case a legislation like the Prevention of Corrup tion Act for superior Judges also is considered necessary at this point of time, the Parliament can perform its function by enacting suitable legislation, it being a virgin field of legislation.\n[274B] 8.3 There is no material to indicate that corruption in judiciary was a mischief to be cured when the Prevention of Corruption Act was enacted.\nFor this reason, the desirabili ty now expressed of having such a law cannot be an aid to construction of the existing law to widen its ambit and bring these constitutional functionaries within it.\n[273B C] 8.4 Judicial activism can supply the deficiencies and fill gaps in an already existing structure found deficient in some ways, but it must stop sort of building a new edi fice where there is none.\n[273D] 8.5 If it is considered that the situation has altered requiring scrutiny of the conduct of even Judges at the highest level, and that it is a matter for the Parliament to decide, then the remedy lies in enacting suitable legisla tion for that purpose providing for safeguards to ensure independence of judiciary since the existing law does not provide for that situation.\n[306D E] 8.6 Any attempt to bring the Judges of the High Courts and the supreme Court within the purview of the Prevention of Corruption Act by a seemingly constructional exercise of the enactment, appears to be an exercise to fit a square peg in a round hole when the two were never intended to match.\n[306E F]", + "2124": "When item 40 of Part 13 of the Schedule to the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950, declared \"Sunris excluding Sahas\" as a Schduled Caste, it indicates that men of Sunri caste but not those within that caste who formed the smaller caste group of Sahas, are members of a Scheduled Caste.\nIt does not indicate that Sahas are a caste distinct from the Sunri caste, nor was it intended to exclude from Sunris those members of that caste who bore the surname Saha.\n[391 A, D].\nTherefore, when the respondent challenged the election to the West Bengal Legislative Assembly, of the appellant who described himself as a member of the Sunri caste, on the ground that he was a member of the Saha caste group but failed to prove the allegation, it must be held that the appellant was a Sunri by caste and belonged to the Scheduled caste specified in the item, even though he bore the surname Saha.\n[392 D].", + "78": "Sub section (1) of sec.\n19 of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, LVI I of 1947, provided that \"it shall not be lawful for the tenant or any person acting or purporting to act on behalf of the tenant to claim or receive any sum or any consideration as a condition for the relinquishment of his tenancy of any premises\"; and sub sec.\n(2) provided that any tenant or person who in contravention of the provisions of sub sec.\n(1) receives any sum or consideration shall on conviction be punished with imprisonment and also with fine.\nA. who was a tenant of a flat, handed over vacant posses sion the flat to B on receiving \"pugree\", under a document which recited that A shall have no claim whatever over the flat and that B shall pay the rent directly to the landlord.\nA was convicted of an offence under sec.\n19 (2).\nHeld, that there was no \"relinquishment\" of his tenancy by A, within the meaning of sec.\n19 (1) and the conviction could not be sustained.\nThere is a clear distinction between an assignment of a tenancy on the one hand and a relinquishment or surrender on the other.\nIn the case of an assignment, the assignor con tinues to be liable to the landlord for the performance of his obligations under the tenancy and this liability is contractual, while the assignee becomes liable by reason of privity of estate.\nThe consent of the landlord to an as signment is not necessary, in the absence of a contract or local usage to the contrary.\nBut in the case of relinquish ment it cannot be a unilateral transaction; it can only be in favour of the lessor by mutual agreement between them.\nRelinquishment of possession must be to the lessor or one who holds his interest; and surrender or relinquishment terminates the lessee 's rights and lets in the lessor.\nAs sec.\n19 of Bombay Act LVII of 1947 creates an offence and imposes a penalty of fine and imprisonment, the words of the section must be strictly construed in favour of the subject.\nThe Court is not concerned so much with what might possibly have been intended as with what has been actually said in and by the language employed in the statute.\nJudgment of the Bombay High Court reversed.", + "4316": "Dismissing the appeals by special leave, the Court. ^ HELD: Per Pathak, J. (Krishna Iyer and Chinnappa Reddy, JJ.\nconcurring) (1) Having regard to the financial capacity of M/s. Tata Consulting Engineers, the appellant, and the material on the record and the various other considerations which prevailed with the Tribunal, the granting of revised wage scales is in order.\nAlthough the wage scales were introduced as long ago as 1973 they were maintained at that level except for a slight revision some time thereafter.\nNo dearness allowance was paid until the beginning of 1977 and the house rent allowance also was introduced about that time.\nThe cost of living had gone on increasing from 1972 onwards and the dearness allowance and house rent allowances made no appreciable impact in neutralising the increasing cost.\nDuring all these years, the appellant had continued to enjoy increasing profits; nonetheless the emoluments received by the workmen did not receive the impress of the appellant 's growing prosperity.\nThe Charter of Demands was presented by the Union in July, 1974 and when conciliation proceedings failed the State Government made a reference to the Industrial Tribunal in 1975.\nThe several considerations which prevailed with the Tribunal giving retrospectivity to the revised pay scales and referred to by it cannot be ignored.\n[174C G] (2) It is not a universal rule that the dearness allowance should in all cases be correlated with the cost of living index.\nThe Tribunal, in the present case, considered the matter and found it sufficient and in accord with justice that the wage scales should be restructured with suitable increments provided therein.\nIt noted that dearness allowance was being granted by the appellant at 10% of the salary subject to a minimum of Rs. 50/ and house rent allowance at 30% of the basic salary.\nHaving regard to the not inconsiderable improvement in the level of the basic wage, it observed that there would be a consequent increase in the dearness allowance and house rent allowance.\nIn view of the increase so secured, the Tribunal rejected the suggestion that a slab system should be introduced in the dearness allowance or that there should be any other modification of the principle on which dearness allowance was being presently granted.\nIt declared that the cumulative effect of an im 167 proved wage structure together with dearness allowance operating on a slab system would throw an impossible burden of about Rs. 1 crore on the financial capacity of the appellant.\nIt was open to the Tribunal to adopt the position which it did.\nIf the dearness allowance is linked with the cost of living index the whole award will have to be reopened and the entire basis on which it has been made will have to be reconsidered.\nThe award is a composite document in which the several elements of increased wage scales, larger increments longer span of 20 years for earning increments, dearness allowance at 10% of the basic wage, besides several other benefits, have been integrated into a balanced arrangement in keeping with what the Tribunal has found to be the financial capacity of the appellant.\nIt is not possible to maintain one part of the award and supersede another.\n[179 E F] The Hindustan Times Ltd, New Delhi vs Their Workmen, [1964] 1 SCR 234, 247 and Bengal Chemical & Pharmaceutical Works Limited vs its Workmen; , , distinguished.\n(3) The jurisdiction given to the Tribunal by rule 31 of the Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules, 1957, is closely circumscribed.\nIt is only a clerical mistake or error which can be corrected and the clerical mistake or error must arise from an accidental slip or omission in the award.\nAn accidental slip or omission implies that something was intended and contrary to that intention what should not have been included has been included or what should have been included has been omitted.\nIt must be a mistake or error amenable to clerical correction only.\nIt must not be a mistake or error which calls for rectification by modification of the conscious adjudication on the issues involved.\n[175 A C] Per contra The order of 22nd December, 1978 is invalid so far as it amends paragraph 23 of the original award.\nThe amendment has resulted in the Tribunal making, as it were, a supplementary award, whereby a further relief is being granted beyond that granted in the original award.\nThe original award was completed and signed by the Tribunal, and it cannot be reopened now except for the limited purpose of Rule 31.\nIn travelling outside and beyond the terms of the original award, the Tribunal has committed a jurisdictional error.\nThe evidence contained in the award throughout provides incontrovertible proof that this flat increase (ad hoc) was never originally intended in the award.\nThere was only one increase contemplated in the award, in paragraph 23 of the award and it is more than plain that the increase was the one incorporated in the revised pay scales pertaining to different categories.\nNo second flat increase was envisaged at all.\nThe amendment made by the Tribunal has the effect of providing a second increase, this time to each individual workmen.\nIf, as the Tribunal has stated in the amendment order.\nthe increase in paragraph 23 was intended to apply to each individual workmen, there is nothing in the body of the award to form the foundation on which the actual figures in the restructured pay scales can be made to rest.\nThere will be no explanation why the initial start of the revised pay scales has been increased by Rs. 150/ in the case of the category of Draughtsmen and Rs. 100/ in the case of other categories.\nConsidering the fitment of the workmen in the revised scales, it was stated in the award that workman found drawing a salary less than the beginning of the grade would be stepped up to the beginning of the grade and if his pay fell between two steps in the reclassified pay scales the 168 basic pay was to be fixed at the step higher in the revised scale.\nFurther the award was made on the basis that the overall financial load according to paragraph 33 of the award would be to the tune of about Rs. 5 lakhs.\nIt was that figure which the Tribunal had in mind against the backdrop of the gross annual figures when it made the revised pay scales retrospective from 1st January, 1976.\n[176 D G, 177A, 178 D F] The statement, Exhibit C 51 afforded an indication merely of what the additional financial load would be if a flat increase was given to the individual workmen on the alternative basis set forth therein.\nNone of the alternatives actually adopted by the Tribunal, because when the award was made the Tribunal proceeded instead to restructure the wage scales by the addition of Rs. 150/ in the case of the category of Draughtsmen and of Rs. 100/ in the case of other categories to the initial pay in the wage scales pertaining to these categories.\nThe addition was integrated as a feature of the wage scales, it was not regarded as an addition to the pay of each individual workmen.\n[178A C] It is an accepted principle that consent by a party cannot confer jurisdiction on a court.\nWhat is without jurisdiction will remain so.\n[178 E F] Per O. C. Reddy, J. (Majority view, Iyer and Reddy, JJ.) The order dated December 22, 1978 of the Industrial Tribunal which purports to correct the award dated December 20, 1978 cannot be considered in effect to be a fresh award and it is in order.\nThe omission of the words \"to each employee\" after the figure Rs. 150/ and again after the figure Rs. 100/ was clearly an accidental slip or omission which the Tribunal was entitled to correct.\nThe application for the correction was made immediately, that is to say, two days after the Award, while iron was still hot or when everything must have been fresh to the minds of the Tribunal.\nEven the endorsement made on the application by the Advocate for the Company to the effect \"submitted to whatever this honourable Tribunal desires to do, does not indicate that the Company had any objection to the award being corrected as sought by the employees union.\nOn the other hand the endorsement reads as if there was tacit agreement on the part of the Company to the correction sought by the union; it cannot possibly be doubted that an Industrial Tribunal deciding upon the wage scales of the employees of an establishment would have full liberty to propose ad hoc increase of salaries as part of the revision of pay scales, not can it be doubted that fitment into the revised pay scales is certainly a part of the revision of pay scales.\nThis is elementary and fundamental to the jurisdiction of the Industrial Tribunal in revising wage scales.\nIf without any flat or ad hoc increase of salary the workmen were to be fitted into revised scales of pay, it would, obviously, result in serious anomalous situations.\nIn the case of several senior employees, the revised scale would yield but a very small and almost a token increase in the size of the pay packet whereas the junior employees would get a large benefit.\nWhile workmen raising industrial disputes for revision of wage scales are certainly minded about their future prospects in the matter of wages, they, surely would be more concerned with the immediate benefit accruing to them.\nThat was why the Industrial Tribunal thought that all round flat increase of Rs. 150/ in the case of Draughtsmen and Rs. 100/ in the case of other workmen to each employee was called for.\n[180C, 181D E, G H, 182A, 183D E, G H, 184A B] 169 (4) While it is true that Dearness Allowance linked to cost of living index is ordinarily the best and the most scientific method of computing dearness allowance, it cannot always be said that an illegality warranting interference under Article 136 is committed if some other method is adopted.\nIn the instant case, the Tribunal has given satisfactory reasons for adopting a different mode.\n[184 F G]", + "1778": "In pursuance of an award made by an Industrial Tribunal fixing the pay of the employees at Rs. 2/2/ per day, the management of the appellant had entered into an agreement with its workmen, that the effect would be given to the wage structure prescribed by the said award.\nIn spite of the award and the agreement, the appellant paid its employees only As.\n/10/ per day and that led to the present claim made by the respondents under section 15 of the Payment of Wages Act.\nThey asked for an order from the payment of wages authority directing the appellant to pay the said prescribed wages.\nAgainst the respondent 's claim it was urged by the appellant that section 15 of the Act was inapplicable, because the rates of wages fixed by the award did not fall within the definition of wages prescribed by section 2(vi) of the Act.\nThe authority rejected the appellant 's contention.\nThe appellant then challenged the correctness of the conclusion of the authority before the High Court under article 226 of the Constitution.\nThe High Court dismissed the writ petition and affirmed the finding of the authority.\nIt held that section 15 was applicable to the case, because the wages prescribed by the award did amount to wages as defined by section 2(vi) of the Act.\nOn appeal by Special Leave the appellant contended that before it is held that the wages prescribed by the award fall under section 2(vi), it must be shown that they constitute part of the terms of the contract of employment, either express of implied.\nHeld: The argument is not well founded.\nWhen an award is made and it prescribes a new wage structure, in law the old contractual wage structure becomes inoperative and its place is taken by the wage structure prescribed by the award.\nIn a sense, the latter wage structure must be deemed to be the contract between the parties, because that, in substance, is the effect of industrial adjudication.\nThe true legal position is that when industrial disputes are decided by industrial adjudication and awards are made, the said awards supplant contractual terms in respect of matters covered by them and are substituted by them.\nThat being so, it is difficult to hold that the wages prescribed by the award cannot be treated as wages under section 2(vi) of the Act before it was amended.\nThe amendment has merely clarified what was included in the unamended definition itself.\nSouth Indian Bank Ltd. vs A. R. Chacko, A.I.R, 1964 S.C. 1522, referred to.\nJogindra Nath Chatterjee and Sons, V. Chandreswar Singh, A.I.R., , inapplicable.\nModern Mills Ltd. vs V. R. Mangalvedhikar, A.I.R., 1950 Bom.\n342 and V. B. Godse, Manager, Prabha Mills Ltd. vs R. M. Naick , approved L/P(D)lSCI 14(a) 420", + "314": "It is not every offence committed by a public servant that requires sanction for prosecution under section 197 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure nor even every act done by him while he is actually engaged in the performance of his official duties; but if the act complained of is directly concerned with his official duties so that, if questioned, it could be claimed to have been done by virtue of the office, then sanction would be necessary; and that would be so, irrespective of whether it was, in fact, a proper discharge of his duties, because that would really be a matter of defence on the merits, which would have to be investigated at the trial, and could not arise at the stage of the grant of sanction, which must precede the institution of the prosecution.\nWhether sanction is necessary to prosecute a public servant on a charge of criminal misappropriation, will depend on whether the acts complained of hinge on his duties as a public servant.\nIf they do, then sanction is requisite.\nBut if they are unconnected with such duties, then no sanction is necessary.\nHori Ram Singh vs Emperor ([1939] F.C.R. 159), H. H. B. Gill vs The King ([1948] L.R. 75 I.A. 41), Albert West Meads vs The King ([1948] L.A. 75 I.A. 185), Phanindra Chandra vs The King ([1949] L.R. 76 I.A. 10), B. W. Mothavzs vs State of West Bengal ([1955] 1 S.C.R. 216) and Shreekantiah Ramayya Munipalli vs The State of Bombay ([1955] 1 S.C.R. 1177), referred to.", + "690": "Section 32(1) of the Travancore Income tax Act, which corresponds to section 24(1) of the Indian Income tax Act, 1922, provided : \" Where any assessee sustains a loss of profits or gains in any year under any of the heads mentioned in Section 9 [section 6 of the Indian Act he shall be entitled to have the amount of loss set off against this income, profits or gains under any other head in that year : Provided that where the loss sustained is a loss of profits or gains which would but for the loss have accrued or arisen within British India or in an Indian State and would under the provisions of clause (c) of sub section (2) of Section 18 corresponding to section 14 Of the Indian Act] have been exempted from tax, such loss shall not be set off except against profits or gains accruing or arising within British India or in an Indian State and exempt from tax under the said provisions \".\nThe assessees were companies having their head offices in the erstwhile State of Cochin with branches in the erstwhile State of Travancore and in other places outside the latter State.\nThey made profits in Travancore State but incurred losses in Cochin State and other places, and for the purposes of assessment to income tax they sought to deduct this loss from the profits made in Travancore State.\nThe Income tax Officer acting under the provisions of the Travancore Income tax Act, determined the assessable income representing only the profits made in Travancore State and under section 32(1), first proviso of the Travancore Income tax Act which corresponds to the first proviso to section 24(1) of the Indian Income tax Act, 1922 refused to allow a deduction of the losses incurred.\nThe assessees claimed that the business 257 which they were carrying on was one and indivisible for the purpose of determining the amount assessable to income tax and that they were entitled to a deduction of the losses incurred outside Travancore State.\nThe contention on behalf of the income tax authorities was (i) that under the first proviso to section 32(1) of the Travancore Income tax Act losses incurred in places out I side the State of Travancore cannot be set off against profits made in that State, (2) that though profits and losses in the State arising under the same head could be set off, the proviso, aforesaid, affected not only the generality of the main enactment but also introduced an addendum that where the profits of the business arose in the State and the losses under the head business were sustained outside that State, those losses could not by virtue of the proviso be deducted from profits made in the State,(3) that the proviso applied only to the bead \" business in the two respective territories, as the words used therein are where the loss sustained is a loss of profits or gains \" andthe word \" income \" is not mentioned therein, and (4) that the word \" business \" in section 13 of the Travancore Act corresponding to section 10 of the Indian Act, must mean business in Travancore State under section 13 Of that Act and \" business in British India \" under the Indian Act, because before 1939 income was not chargeable under the two Acts, unless it was received or accrued in Travancore State or British India, as the case may be, and profits and gains of business in territories outside Travancore or in an Indian State were exempted from payment of income tax in Travancore State or in British India, as the case may be.\nHeld:(i) Under section 24(1) of the Indian Income tax Act, 1922 Is.\n32(1) of the Travancore Income tax Act] a set off can be claimed only when the loss arises under one head and the income, profits and gains against which it is sought to be set off arises under a different head.\nIn cases where profits and losses arise under the same head they have to be adjusted against each other under the provisions Of sections 7 to 12B of the Indian Act.\nArunachalam Chettiar vs Commissioner of Income tax, (1936) L.R. 63 I. A. 233 and Anglo French Textiles Co., Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income tax, Madras, , relied on.\n(2)The territory of a proviso is to carve out an exception to the main enactment and exclude something which otherwise would have been within the section; it has to operate in the same field and if the language of the main enactment is clear it cannot be used for the purpose of interpreting the main enactment or to exclude by implication what the enactment clearly says unless the words of the proviso are such that that is its necessary effect.\nAbdul jabar Butt vs State of Jammu and Kashmir, ; , Ram Narain Sons Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner of Sales ' ; , Madras & (1944) L.R. 71 I.A. 113 33 258 and Corporation of the City of Toronto vs Attorney General for Of Canada, , relied on.\nConsequently, section 24(1), first proviso, of the Indian Income tax Act, 1922 Is.\n32(1), first proviso, of the Travancore Act] bars the right of set off only where a loss in the Indian States under one head is sought to be set off against profits in British India under any other head, and does not apply to profits and losses and computation thereof which fall under section 10 of the Indian Act, corresponding to section 13 of the Travancore Act.\n(3)The mere fact that the word \" income \" is not used in the proviso does not justify the construction that the intention of the Legislature was to restrict the right to a set off of profits and losses arising in Indian States only to business or to modify the mode of computation under section 10 of the Indian Income tax Act.\n(4)The word \" business,, in section 10 of the Indian Income tax Act, 1922, is not confined to business in British India, in view of the definition of \" total income \" and \" total world income \" and chargeability of total income under section 3, Or the provisions Of section 4 where in the case of a resident \" total income \" includes income, profits and gains accruing within or without British India.", + "1789": "Shortly after the extension of the age of retirement from 55 to 58 subject to the employee passing a medical examination at 55 in the respondent company 's Head Office at Calcutta, their workmen at Bombay branch raised an industrial dispute claiming the extension of their age of retirement from 55 to 60.\nThe dispute was referred to the Industrial Tribunal.\nThe company resisted the claim but was agreeable to introduce similar provisions as introduced at Calcutta.\nThe difficulty in accepting the company 's case was the conclusion recorded by the Supreme Court in its earlier decisions that the trend in Bombay region was to fix the age at 60.\nSo the Tribunal considered it to be its duty to enquire whether the conclusion recorded by the Supreme Court was accurate and ultimately persuaded itself to hold that no such trend was established in fact, and directed that the age of retirement should be 58.\nHeld: (i) After careful consideration of all the materials placed on this record, there was nothing to justify any doubt about the correctness of what was said on the earlier occasion by this Court.\nThe approach adopted by the Tribunal in dealing with this aspect of the problem is not very commendable and its present conclusion that what was said by itself on an earlier occasion and was confirmed by this Court in appeal, was in fact inaccurate, is on the whole unsound.\nWhat the Tribunal has failed to notice is that instances which may justify a revision of the judicial opinion expressed on an earlier occasion about a particular trend must be strong and unambiguous and they must speak for the period both before and more particularly after the previous finding had been recorded in the matter.\n(ii) The information furnished by the several documents on this record clearly show a consistent trend in the Bombay region to fix the retirement age of clerical and subordinate staff at 60.\nImperial Chemical Industries (India) Private Ltd. vs Their Workmen, ; and Dunlop Rubber Co. Ltd. vs Workmen ; , relied on.", + "2122": "The Company Law Board was constituted under Section 10E of the , and the Central Government delegated some of its powers under the Act, including those under Section 237, to the Board.\nThe Government also framed rules under Section 642(1) read with Section 10E(5) called the Company Law Board (Procedure) Rules 1964, Rule 3 of which empowered the Chairman of the Board to distribute the business of the Board among himself and other member or members and to specify the cases or classes of cases which were to be considered jointly by the Board.\nOn February 6, 1954, under the power vested in him by Rule 3 the Chairman passed an order specifying the cases that had to be considered jointly by himself and the only other member of the Board and distributing the remaining business between himself and the member.\nUnder this order the business of ordering investigations under Sections 235 and 237 was allotted to himself to be performed by him singly.\nOn May 19, 1965 an order was issued on behalf of the Company Law Board under Section 237(b) of the .\nappointing four inspectors to investigate the affairs of the appellant company, on the ground that the Board was of the opinion that there were circumstances suggesting that the business of the appellant company was being conducted with intent to defraud its creditors, members or any other persons and that the persons concerned in the management of the affairs of the company had in connection therewith been guilty of fraud, misfeasence and other misconduct towards the company and its members.\nSoon afterwards the appellants filed a petition under article 226 of the Constitution for the issue of a writ quashing the order of the Board on the grounds, inter alia, that the order had been issued mala fide that there was no material on which such an order could have been made, etc.\nOne of the affidavits filed in reply to the petition was by the ,Chairman of the Company Law Board, in which it was contended, inter alia, that there was material on the basis of which the impugned order was issued and he had himself examined this material and formed the necessary opinion within the meaning of sec.\n237(b) before the issue of the order; and that it was not competent for the court to go into the question of the adequacy or otherwise of such material.\nIn the course of replying to some of the allegations in the petition it was stated in paragraph 14 of the affidavit, however, that from memoranda received from some ex directors of the company and other examination it appeared, inter alia, that there had been delay, bungling and faulty planning of the company 's main project ,resulting in double expenditure; that the company had incurred huge losses; there had been a sharp fall in the price of the company 's SCI 22 312 shares; and some eminent persons had resigned from the Board of Directors of the company because of differences with the Managing Director on account of the manner in which the affairs of the company were being conducted.\nThe appellant 's petition was dismissed by the High Court.\nIn the appeal to this Court it was contended on behalf of the appellants: (1) That the order was made made fide on account of the competing interests of a firm in which the Minister in charge of the department was interested and also because of his personal hostility against the second petitioner who was the managing director of the company; that the High Court had erred in deciding the petition on the footing that the first respondent Board was an independent authority and that it was its Chairman who on his own had formed the requisite opinion and passed the order and therefore the motive or the evil eye of the Minister was irrelevant; the High Court also erred in failing to appreciate that even though the impugned order was by the Chairman, as under section 10E(6) it had to receive and in fact received the Minister 's agreement, if the Minister 's mala fides were established, that would vitiate the order; furthermore, in the circumstances of the case.\nthe High Court ought to have allowed the appellants an opportunity to establish their case of mala fide by the cross examination of the Minister and the Chairman, both of whom had filed affidavits.\n(2) That clause (b) of Section 237 required two things: (i) the requisite opinion of the Central Government, in the present case, of the Board, and (ii) the existence of circumstances suggesting that the company 's business was being conducted as laid down in sub clause (i) or that the persons mentioned in sub clause (ii) were guilty of fraud, misfeasance or misconduct towards the company or any of its members; though the opinion to be formed is subjective, the existence of circumstances set out in cl.\n(b) is a condition precedent to the formation of such opinion and therefore even if the impugned order were to contain a recital of the existence of those circumstances, the court can go behind that recital and determine whether they did in fact exist, that even taking the circumstances said to have been found by the respondent Board, they were extraneous to see.\n237(b) and could not constitute a basis for the impugned order.\n(3) That the impugned order was in fact made on the basis of allegations contained in memoranda submitted by four ex directors of the company who continued to be shareholders; and by ordering an investigation under section 237(b) the respondent Board had in effect enabled these shareholders to circumvent the provisions of section 235 and section 236.\nOn this ground also the impugned order was therefore made mala fide or was otherwise invalid.\n(4) That the impugned order was in any case bad as it was passed by the Chairman of the Respondent Board alone acting under rules under which such a power was conferred in contravention of the provisions of Section 10E.\nThe power under section 237 was delegated by the Central Government to the Board as a whole and could not in turn be sub delegated to the Chairman alone in the absence of a provision such as sub sec.\n(4A) added to sec.\n10E after the impugned order was issued, and which now enabled the solidarity of the Board to be broken.\nSuch sub delegation could not be done in accordance with rules made under section 10E(5) which merely enabled the procedure of the Board to be regulated.\n313 (5) That the impugned order was bad because Section 237(b) itself was bad as offending against articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution.\nHELD: (By Hidayatullah.\nBachawat and Shelat, JJ., Sarkar C.J. and Mudholkar J. dissenting): The impugned order must be set aside.\n(1) (By the Court): The respondents had failed to show that the impugned order was passed mala fide.\nL330 E; 335 B C; F G].\n(Per Sarkar C.J. and Mudholkar J.3: The decision to order the investigation was taken by the Chairman of the respondent Board and there was nothing to indicate that in arriving at that decision he was influenced by the Minister.\nIf the decision arrived at by the Chairman was an independent one, it could not be said to have been rendered mala fide because it was later approved by the Minister.\n[320 D].\nIn a proceeding under article 226 of the Constitution, the normal rule is, as pointed out by this Court in The State of Bombay vs Purshottam Jog Naik ; , to decide disputed questions on the basis of affidavits and that it is within the discretion of the High Court whether to allow a person who has sworn an affidavit before it to be cross examined or not.\nThe High Court having refused permission for the cross examination, it would not be appropriate for this Court, while hearing an appeal.\nby special leave, to interfere lightly with the exercise of its discretion.\n[320 G H; 321 A].\n(Per Shelat J.): The allegations of mala fides in the petition were not grounded on any knowledge but only on \"reasons to believe\".\nEven for their reasons to believe, the appellants had not disclosed any information on which they were founded.\nNo particulars of the main allegations were given.\nAlthough in a case of this kind it would be difficult for a petitioner to have personal knowledge in regard to an averment of mala fides, where such knowledge is wanting, he must disclose his source of information so that the other side gets a fair chance to verify it and make an effective answer.\nIn the absence of tangible materials, the only answer which the respondents could array against the allegations as to mala fides would be one of general denial.\n[352 D H].\nIn a petition under article 226, there is undoubtedly ample power in the High Court to order attendance of a deponent in court for being cross examined.\nWhere it is not possible for the court to arrive at a definite conclusion on account of there being affidavits on either side containing allegations and counter allegations, it would not only be desirable but in the interest of justice the duty also of the court to summon a deponent for cross examination in order to arrive at the truth.\nHowever, the High Court was rightly of the view that in the present case even if the two deponents were to be called for cross examination, they could in the absence of particulars of allegations of mala fides and the other circumstances of the case, only repeat their denials in the affidavits of the allegations in the petition and therefore such cross examination would not take the court any further than the affidavits.\n[353 D H].\n(2) (Per Hidayatullah, Bachawat and Shelat JJ.\nSarkar, C. J. and Mudholkar J. dissenting,):The circumstances disclosed in paragraph 14 of the affidavit must be regarded as the only materials on the basis of which the respondent Board formed the opinion before ordering an investigation under Section 237(b).\nThese circumstances could not reasonably suggest that the business of the company was being conducted to defraud the creditors, members or other L/S5SCI 22(a) 314 persons or that the management was guilty of fraud towards the company and its members; they were therefore, extraneous to the matters mentioned in section 237(b) and the impugned order was ultra vires the Section.\n[339 A D, G H; 340 A; 342 G H; 343 AC; 365 D E; 367 A C].\n(Per Hidayatullah J.): The power under Section 237(b) in a discretionary power and the first requirement for its exercise is the 'honest formation of an opinion that an investigation is necessary.\n,The next requirement is that \"there are circumstances suggesting\" the inferences stout in the Section.\nAn action, not based on circumstances suggesting an inference of the enumerated kind will not be valid.\nNo doubt the formation of opinion is subjective but the existence of circumstances relevant to the inference as the sine qua non for action must be demonstrable.\nIf their existence is questioned, it has to be proved at least prima facie.\nIt is not sufficient to assert, that the circumstances exist and give no clue to what they are, because the circumstances must be such as to lead to conclusions of certain definiteness.\nThe conclusions must relate to an intent to defraud, a :fraudulent or unlawful purpose, fraud or misconduct or the withholding of information of a particular kind.\n[335 F H; 336 G H] An examination of the affidavit filed by the Chairman of the respondent Board showed that the material examined by the Chairman merely indicated the need for a deeper probe.\nThis was not sufficient.\nThe material must suggest certain inferences and not the need for \"a deeper probe\".\nThe former is a definite conclusion the 'latter a mere fishing expedition.\n[338 E H].\n(Per Shelat J.): Althouugh the formation of opinion by cen tral Government is a purely subjective process and such an opinion cannot be challenged in a court on the ground of propriety, reasonableness or sufficiency, the Authority concerned is nevertheless required to arrive at such an opinion from circumstances suggesting what is set out in sub clauses (i), (ii) or (iii) of section 237 (b).\nThe expres sion \"circumstances suggesting\" cannot support the construction that even the existence of circumstances is a matter of subjective opinion.\nIt is hard to contemplate that the legislature could have left to the subjective process both the formation of opinion and also the existence of circumstances on which it is to be founded.\nIt is also not reasonable to say that the clause permitted the Authority to say that it has formed the opinion on 'circumstances which in its opinion exist and which in its opinion suggest an intent to defraud or a fraudulent or unlawful purpose.\nIf it is shown that the circumstances do not exist or that they are such that it is impossible for any one to form an opinion therefrom suggestive of the matters enumerated in section 237 (b) the opinion is challengeable on the ground 'of non application of mind or perversity or on the ground that it was formed on collateral grounds and was beyond the scope of the statute.\n[362 H; 363 A G].\n(Per Sarkar C.J., and Mudholkar J. dissenting): An examina tion of section 237 would show that cl.\n(b) thereof confers a discretion upon the 'Board to appoint an Inspector to investigate the affairs of a company.\nThe words \"in the opinion of\" govern the word \"there are circumstances suggesting\" and not the words \"may do so\".\nThe words 'circumstances ' and 'suggesting ' cannot be dissociated without making it impossible for the Board to form an 'opinion ' at all.\nThe formation of an opinion must, 'therefore, be as to whether there are circumstances suggesting the existence of one or more of 'the matters in sub cls.\n(i) to (iii) and not about anything else.\nThe opinion must of course not have been arrived at mala fide.\nTo say that the, opinion to be formed must be as to the necessity 315 of making an investigation would be making a clear departure from the language in which section 237(b) is couched.\nIt is only after the formation of certain opinion by the Board that the stage for exercising the discretion conferred by the provision is reached.\nThe discretion conferred to order an investigation is administrative and not judicial since its exercise one way or the other does not affect the rights of a company nor does it lead to any serious consequences as, for instance, hampering the business of the company.\nAs has been pointed out by this Court in Raja Narayanalal Bansilal vs Maneck Phiroz Mistry and Anr. , the investigation undertaken under this provision is for ascertaining facts and is thus merely exploratory.\nThe scope for judicial review of the action of the Board must, therefore be strictly limited.\nIf it can be shown that the Board had in fact not formed an opinion its order could be successfully challenged.\nThere is a difference between not forming an opinion at all and forming an opinion upon grounds, which, if a court could go into that question at all, could be regarded as inapt or insufficient or irrelevant.\nThe circumstances set out in paragraph 14 of the affidavit of the Chairman of the respondent Board were nothing more than certain conclusions drawn by the Board from some of the material which it had before it.\nMoreover, the expression \"inter alia\" used by the Chairman would show that the conclusions set out by him specifically were not the only ones which could be drawn from the material before the Board.\nIt would not therefore be right to construe the affidavit to mean that the only conclusions emerging from the material before the Board were those set out in paragraph 14.\n[352 A E].\n(3) (Per Sarkar C. J. and Mudholkar J.): As it could not be said that the investigation had been ordered either at the instance of 4 ex directors of the company or on the sole basis of the memoranda submitted by them, there was no contravention of the provisions of Sections 235 and 236 of the Act.\n[328 C, E].\n(4) (Per Sarkar C. J., Mudholkar and Bachawat JJ.\n, Hidayatullah and Shelat JJ., dissenting): Rule 3 of the Company Law Board (Procedure) Rules, 1964, and the order dated April 6, 1964 made pursuant thereto distributing the business of the Board, were both valid.\nThe impugned order was not therefore invalid because it was made by the Chairman alone and not by the Board.\n[330 C. D; 342 B C].\n(Per Sarkar C.J. and Mudholkar J.): Bearing in mind the fact that the power conferred by Section 237(b) is merely administrative, the allocation of the business of the Board relating to the exercise of such power must be regarded as a matter of procedure.\nStrictly speaking the Chairman to whom the business of the Board is allocated does not become a delegate of the Board at all.\nHe acts in the name of the Board and is no more than its agent.\nBut even if he is looked upon as a delegate of the Board and, therefore, sub delegate vis avis the Central Government, he would be as much subject to the control of the Central Government as the Board itself, for sub section\n(6) of section 10E provides that the Board shall, in the exercise of the powers delegated to it, be subject to the control of the Central Government and the order distributing the business was made with permission of the Central Government.\nBearing in mind that the maxim delegates non protest delegable sets out what is merely a rule of construction, subdelegation can be sustained if permitted by an express provision or by necessary implication.\nWhere, as here, what is sub delegated is an administrative power and control over its exercise is retained by the nominee of Parliament, that is, here the Central Government, the power to make a delegation may be inferred, [329 F H; 330 A C].\n316 (Per Bachwat J.): The function under section 237(b) involves the exercise of a discretion.\nPrima facie all the members of the Board acting together were required to discharge this function and they could not delegate their duty to the Chairman.\nHowever, under sections 10E(5) and 642(1), the Central Government may frame rules regulating the procedure of the Board and generally to carry out the purpose of the Act.\nIn the context of section 10E, the rule making power should be construed liberally.\nThe Central Government has power to constitute the Company Law Board, to delegate its function to the Board and to control the Board in the exercise of its delegated functions.\nIn this background, by conferring on the Central Government the additional power of framing rules regulating the procedure of the Board and generally to carry out the purposes of section 10E Parliament must have intended that the internal Organisation of the Board and the mode and manner of transacting its business should be regulated entirely by rules framed by the Government.\nThe Government had, therefore, power to frame the Company Law Board (Procedure) Rules.\n1964 authorising the Chairman to distribute the business of the Board.\nIn the exercise of the power conferred by this rule, the Chairman assioned the business under section 237 to himself.\nThe Chairman alone could, therefore, pass the impugned order.\n[341 F H; 342 A C].\n(Per Hidayatullah J.): The new sub section 4A of Section 10E, which was not there when the impugned order was made.\nenables the work of the Board to be distributed among members, while sub section\n(5) merely enables the procedure of the Board to be regulated.\nThese are two very different things.\nOne provides for distribution of work in such a way that each constituent part of the Board, properly autho rised.\nbecomes the Board.\nThe other provides for the procedure of the Board.\nWhat is the Board is not a question which admits of solution by procedural rules but by the enactment of a substantive provision allowing for a different delegation.\nSuch an enactment has been framed in relation to the Tribunal constituted under section 10B and has now been framed under section 10E also.\nThe new sub section involves a delegation of the powers of the Central Government to a member of the Board which the Act previously allowed to be made to the Board only.\nThe statute, as it was formerly, gave no authority to delegate if differently or to another person or persons.\nWhen it spoke of procedure in sub section (5) it spoke of the procedure of the Board As constitlited.\nThe lacuna in the Act must have felt; otherwise there was no need to enact sub section (4A), [334 B E].\n(Per Shelat T.): The statute having permitted the delegation of powers to the Board only as the statutory Authority the powers so delegated have to be exercised by the Board and not by its components.\nTo authorise its Chairman to hand over those functions and powers to the.\nBoard only as the statutory Authority, the powers so by the Act.\nThe effect of r. 3 and the order of distribution of work made in pursuance thereof was not laying down a procedure but au thorising and, making a sub delegation in favour of the members.\nThe only procedure which the Government could prescribe was the procedure in relation to Board the manner in which it should discharge and exercise the functions and Powers delegated to it, but it could not make a provision which under the cloak of procedure authorised sub delegation.\n[369 F H; 370 A, B].\n(5) (By the Court): The provisions of Section 237(b) were not violative of Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution.\n[328 F G; 342 D F; 371 H].\nSections 234, 235, 236 and 237(b) gave power to different authorities i.e. the Registrar and the Government, provided powers which 317 are different in extent and nature, exercisable in sets of circumstances and in a manner different from one another.\nTherefore, there is no question of discriminatory power having been vested in the Government under these Sections to pick and choose between (one company and the other.\n[370 G, H].\nWhen investigation is ordered, there would be inconvenience in the carrying on of the business of the company.\nIt might also perhaps shake the credit of a company.\nBut an investigation directed under section 237(b) is essentially of an exploratory character and it is not as if any restriction is placed on the right of the concerned company to carry on its business and no restrictions are imposed on those who carry on the company 's affairs.\nEven if it is regarded as a restriction, it is not possible to say that it is not protected as a reasonable restriction under Clause 6 of article 19(1).\n[371 B D].\nCase law referred to.", + "2796": "Two carts loaded with cloth returning alongwith others from a weekly village market were looted by 20 or more persons.\nThe houses of 20 persons including the 14 appellants were searched and the looted cloth was recovered from their Possession.\nThey were tried and held guilty Linder section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.\nThe High Court dismissed their appeals.\nIn appeal by special leave to this Court their only contention was that in the absence of other evidence connecting them with the dacoity, the presumption to be drawn from the possession of stolen clothes ought to have been one under section 411 of he Indian Penal Code or at the most under section 412 of the Indian Penal Code and not of complicity in the crime of dacoity.\nIt was urged that since section 114 of the Evidence Act did not lay down definitely the presumption to be drawn in a given set of circumstances it was necessary always to start with the lesser presumption and draw the higher presumption only when there was some other evidence to.\nshow the complicity of the persons in the crime itself.\nHELD : If there is other evidence to connect an accused with the crime itself, however small, the finding of the stolen property with him is a piece of evidence which connects him further with the crime.\nThere is then no question of presumption.\nThe evidence strengthens the other evidence already against him.\nIt is only when the accused cannot be conis stronger than if there is a large gap of time.\nDisposal of the fruits of crime that the presumption may be drawn.\nIn what circumstances the one presumption or the other may be drawn will differ from case to case [722 D] When the discovery of the fruits of crime is made immediately after the commission of the crime the presumption of complicity in the crime nected with the crime except by reason of possession of the fruits of crime requires the finding of a person ready to receive them and the 'shortness of time, the nature of the property which is disposed of, that is to say, its quality and character determine whether the person who had the goods in his possession received them from another or was himself the thief or dacoit, [722 F] In the present case the offence was committed at night by as many as 'IO persons or more.\nShortly after the offence the houses of 20 persons were searched and large quantities of the stolen goods were found in their houses.\nIt was impossible that these 20 persons were merely 'receivers of stolen property from some other 20 persons who were the decoits.\nIt was legitimate therefore to raise the presumption in this case that the persons with whom the goods were found were the dacoits themselves.\n[723 A B]", + "6852": "The Lt. Governor of Delhi amended the Delhi Poisons Rules, 1926 by the Notification No. F.10/44/72 fin.\n(G) dated 7.8.1973 by including to the list of substances in cluded in the Rules as \"Poisons\", the substance commonly known as \"thinner\" containing spirit and other soluble material.\nThe petitioners in this petition under Article 32 of the Constitution questioned the constitutional validity of Section 5 of the on the grounds that the section gives an arbitrary power to the State Government to include any substance as poison for the purpose of restric tion to be imposed on the possession for sale and sale of the same; that the restriction imposed on possession for sale and sale were not reasonable restrictions; that though the Act was a Central enactment, it was possible of unjust and unjustified discriminatory application as it was left to each State Government to determine what substance they would include as poison, and that the substance, 'thinner ', manu factured by the petitioners would not come within the amend ed Rules.\nDismissing the petition, this Court, HELD: 1.\nThe object of the enactment is to regulate the possession for sale and the sale, whether wholesale or retail of poisons and the importation of the same.\nIn other words, it is intended to control over the traffic in poi sons.\nThe enabled State Government to declare any substance as poison for the purposes of the Act by a notification under the Act or the rules made under the Act.\n[221 G] 3.\nIt is not all poisonous substances that are brought within the regulation under the Act.\nIt is those substances which the Government consider its possession for sale or sale to be regulated in the interest of health and safety of the society.\nThis limitation is inherent in the scheme of the Act itself.\n[223 C D] 4.\nNo comprehensive definition can be given to the word, \"poison\".\nUnder this term would fall anything calculated to destroy life.\nSubstances harmless in themselves might become poison by the time or manner of their administration.\nNoth ing is a poison unless regard be had to its administration.\nA substance may be a deadly poison or a valuable medicine according to how and how much is taken.\nIf the resultant effect of administering into the system produces a violent, morbid or fatal changes or which destroys living tissues, the substance can be safely called poison.\nAny substance which is used for purposes mentioned therein section 4 can definitely be declared as poison.\n[223 D F] 5.\nIt has become a notorious fact that the substance known as 'thinner ' as it is or mixing with some other sub stances are taken as intoxicating spirits endangering the life.\nIn many cases deaths have also occurred due to, drink ing such substance.\nIf the Government thought in the circum stances that the possession or sale of the same is to be regulated it could not be said that they have no power to regulate.\nSection 2 also enables the Government to regulate the possession for sale and the sale of the specified poi son.\n[223 G H; 224 A] 6.\nThe nature of trade in poison is such that nobody can be considered to have an absolute right to carry on the same.\nIt is a business which can be termed even as inherent ly dangerous to health and safety of society in view of the rampant misuse and sale to the poor, weak and helpless as an intoxicant.\nA law in such circumstance can regulate the trade.\nIt is also not necessary that the same substance should be declared as poison for the entire country.\nThe notification and its application to any area would depend on the necessity to declare the substance as poison on the particular facts and situation prevailing in that area and the need to 221 regulate the possession and sale in that area.\nNo question of discrimination can arise in such circumstances.\n[224 G H; 225 A]", + "2649": "The appellants we 're a registered partnership firm engaged in money lending business as well as business in certain chemical goods, and silk yarn.\nAnother firm had a current account with the appellants between the samvat years 2003 and 2008.\nAt the end of the latter year the said account had a debit balance of Rs. 268385 1 3.\nIn the return of income for the assessment year 1953 54 the appellants claimed allowance for the said sum of Rs. 268385 as a bad debt written off as irrecoverable.\nThe claim was disallowed by the authorities under the Income tax Act, 1922.\nThe Tribunal referred to the High Court under section 66(2) of the Income tax Act, 192Z the question whether on the facts and circumstances of the case the Tribunal 's finding that the sum in question did not relate to the appellants money lending business was correct.\nThe High Court answered the question in the affirmative against the appellants.\nThis Court in appeal by special leave re framed the question to be answered by the Tribunal so as to cover not only the money lending business of the appellants but also the business in chemicals etc.\nThe Court directed the Tribunal to submit a supplementary statement of case.\nThe supplementary statement of case submitted by the Tribunal was however found unsatisfactory in as much as it contained a summary of arguments on both sides but no findings on the,facts of the case.\nHence supplementary statement on 'facts was called for.\nThe findings given by the Tribunal were against the appellants.\nOn the contention that the conclusion reached by the Tribunal was not supported by proper discussion of the materials before it, HELD : The findings reached by the Tribunal were findings of fact and those findings were supported by the evidence on record.\nThe Tribunal had found that the loans were not made in the course of money lending business of the assessee nor in respect of any other business of the assessee.\nThis finding covered the entire amount sought to be deducted.\nIn view of this finding which was binding on this Court, the answer to the question re framed had to be in favour of the department.\n[423 B] Also held : (i) The Tribunal in submitting its statement,of case must give not only the facts of the case or the arguments of parties but also its own findings on the, facts and evidence.\n[410 D] (ii) When the assessee had money lending as well as other business, its claim for a bad debt under section 10 (2) (xi) of the Act must be considered in relation to both the businesses and the question submitted by the Tribunal must cover the claim in both its aspects.\n[418 F 419 A] 416", + "6728": "Petitioners ' lands were acquired by the respondents under sections 17 and 19 of the Bangalore Development Act, 1976.\nSection 36 of the said Act made applicable the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, where acquisition is otherwise than by agreement.\nThe notification making the declaration under section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act in respect of the lands in question was made on 20.9.1977.\nOn 20.9.1984s.\n11 A was introduced and brought into force by the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984 prescribing that where the declaration under section 4 of the Land Acquisition ACt was published before the commencement of the Land Acquistion (Amendment) Act, 1984, the award was to be made within two years from such commencement.\nThe awards should have thus been made within two years from 20.9.1984.\nOn 11.9.1985 the petitioners obtained an interim order from this Court directing status quo with regard to the possession of the lands in question in a special leave petition which was dismissed on 29.4.87.\non December 16 17,1987 two writ petitions were filed by the petioners in the High Court Challenging the acquisition, contending that as the awards were not made within two years of the notification making the declaration under section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, the entire acquisition proceedings had lapsed.\nThe High Court granted interim stay in respect of the acquisition of the lands.\nThe petitions were later dismissed.\nAppeals therefrom were also dismissed by a Division Bench.\nThe petitioners preferred these special leave petitions and obtained interim stay of dispossession.\nDismissing the special leave petitions, this Court, 564 HELD: 1.\nThe relief under Article 136 of the Constitution is discretionary and a petitioner who approaches this Court for such relief must come with frank and full disclosure of facts.\nIf he fails to do so and suppresses material facts, his application is liable to be dismissed.[566B C] 2.Whatever the ultimate effect of the stay orders, in view of the provisions of section 11 A of the Land Acquisition ACt, the Fact of the stay orders was highly material in the determination of these special leave petitions.\nThere was no reference in the special leave petitions to any of the stay orders and the Court could know about these orders only when the respondents appeared in response to the notice and filed their counter affidavit.\nThe said interim orders had a direct bearing on the question raised and the non disclosure of the same certainly amounts to suppression of material facts.\nOn this ground alone, the special leave petitions were liable to be rejected.\n[565G H; 566A B]", + "2052": "The respondent employees made applications under section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act for determination and computation of the benefit to which they were entitled under the National Industrial Tribunal (Bank Disputes) Award (Desai Award) as they were not satisfied with the fixation of their pay by the appellant bank under para 5.356 of the Desai Award.\nThe Bank claimed that under clause (ii) of para 5.356 of the Desai Award, the adjusted basic pay in,the new scale was not to exceed what point to point adjustment would give an employee on January 1, 1962 and that this being the maximum permissible under cl.\n(ii), cl.\n(iv) could not give an employee more than the maximum arrived at under cl. (ii).\nThe employees on the other hand claimed that they were entitled to what was provided by sub cls.\n(a), (b) and (c) of cl.\n(iv) and the two increments under sub cl.\n(d) and that it did not matter whether what was thus arrived at exceeded the maximum provided under cl.\nThe Labour Court partially accepted the employees ' contention and fixed their pay accordingly.\nIn appeal.\nHELD:The decision of this Court in Prakash Chand Mehra 's case would govern the interpretation of para 5.356 of the Desai Award also, which is in substance the same as para 292 of the Sastry Award as modified by the Labour Appellate decision.\nThe adjusted basic pay in cl.\n(ii) has to be taken as on January 1, 1959.\nThis follows from the fact that the workman basic pay as on January 1, 1959 cannot be reduced and therefore when cl.\n(ii) speaks of adjusted basic pay it must refer to the same date as in cl.\nFurther cl (iv) which provides for actual calculations starts with words \"subject to rules (i) to (iii)\" and therefore the actual calculations made under cl.\n(iv) must be subject to cls.\n(i) and (ii).\nThis means in effect that the actual fixation under sub cls.\n(a), (b) and (c) of cl.\n(iv) will be subject to cl.\n(i) and cl.\nUnder sub cl.\n(a) of cl.\n(iv) a workman will be placed in the Sastry Award as modified by placing him at the stage in the Sastry Award scale equal to or next above his basic pay as on January 1, 1959 in the scale then in force in the bank concerned.\nBut in view of cl.\n(i) this cannot be less than the actual basic pay of the workman as on January 1, 1959.\nWhere under cl.\n(i) the actual basic pay as on January 1, 1959 is more than what point to point adjustment will give under cl.\n(ii), it cannot be reduced for cl.\n(ii) is subject to cl.\nAfter this has been done the workman would be entitled to increments as provided in sub cl.\n(b) read with sub cl.\n(c) of cl.\n(iv), but this will be subject to cl.\n(i) and (ii) and the adjusted basic pay arrived at by giving the increments under sub cls.\n(b) and (c) cannot exceed the adjusted basic pay as arrived at by point to point adjustment in the Sastry Award as modified or the maximum of that scale or the 899 actual basic pay as on 1st January 1959, as the case may be.\nThus sub cl.\n(a) is subject to cl.\n(i) and the basic pay to be fixed on January 1, 1959 hag to be fixed by reading sub cl.\n(a) of cl.\n(iv) and cl.\n(i) together.\nThen increments under sub cl.\n(b) read with sub cl.\n(c) of cl.\n(iv) have to be added, but this is again subject to the provisions of cls.\n(i) and (ii).\n[903 E; 903 G 904 E] Once it is held that basic pay under cl.\n(ii) has to be worked out as on January 1, 1959 the two increments provided by sub cl.\n(d) of cl.\n(iv) which are beyond that date must be given over and above what has been worked out under sub cls.\n(a), (b) and (c) of cl.\n(iv) of the Desai Award.\nThe fact that by oversight sub cl.\n(d) of cl.\n(iv) was not made a separate clause would make no difference for sub cl.\n(d) provides for a period after the date up to which cl.\n(i) works.\n[904 H 905 B] State Bank of India Prakash Chand Mehra, [1961] 11 L.L.J. 383, relied on.", + "5266": "There is in Calcutta, a Zoological garden located in Alipore, now almost the heart of Calcutta, on either side of Belvedere Road, one of Calcutta 's main arterial roads, fortynine acres of land on one side and eight acres on the other.\nThe main zoo is in the fortynine acres block of land.\nThe said eight acres of land was outside the Zoological garden and separated from it by a 80 100 feet road and is also known as the Begumbari land.\nThe Begumbari land was given to the Zoological garden in '1880.\nAccording to a letter written on July 7, 1880 by the Assistant Secretary to the Government of Bengal in the Public works Department to Mr. L. Schwandler, Honorary Secretary Zoological garden conveying the sanction of the Lt. Governor for the transfer of the Begumbari land to the charge of the Committee of the Zoological Garden, on the terms agreed to by the Committee in their letter dated April 23, 1880, the conditions of the transfer were: \"(i) that the land is to be used for the purpose of acclimatization only; (ii) that Carnivors are not to be kept on any part of it, on any account; (iii) that the grounds are to be kept clear and neat; (iv) that the land must be restored to the government if hereafter required, the Zoological Garden Committee being reimbursed for any expenditure they may have incurred in building there.\" In this eight acres of land there are some old buildings and the vacant land was used for fodder cultivation,for raising flower nursery, as a sumping ground for huge garbages and as burial ground for dead animals.\nIn January, 1979, the Director General of Tourism Gov ernment of India addressed a letter to the Chief Secretary Government of West Bengal conveying the Resolution of the Tourism conference which was presided over by the Union Minister of Tourism and attended by several State Ministers and requesting that land in good location may be made avail able for construction of hotels in a drive to encourage tourism.\nIn May, 1980, the Taj Group of Hotels came forward with a suggestion that they would be able to construct a Five Star Hotel.\nOn September 29, 1980 and November 29, 1980, there were two notes by the Secretary of the Metropol itan Development Department to the effect that the I.T.D.C. was interested in a property known as the Hastings House Properly and that the Taj Group of Hotels who considered the Hastings House properly unsuitable may be offered four acres out of the eight acres of Begumbari land.\nOn the same day the Taj Group of Hotels wrote to the Government of West Bengal stating that the proposed land could be seriously considered for construction of a hotel.\nThereafter, 225 the Chief Minister along with the Minister of Tourism and the Minister for Metropolitan Development visited the site accompanied by the Director of the Zoo to apparently knew about the proposal right from the start.\nA note was then prepared by the Secretary, Metropolitan Development Depart ment and put up to the Chief Minister for his approval.\nThe Chief Minister approved the proposal and required it to be placed before the Cabinet.\nOn January 7, 1981 a memorandum was prepared for the consideration of the Cabinet explaining the need for the more Five Star Hotels in Calcutta and the benefits flowing out of the construction and establishment of such Five Star Hotels and suggesting the lease of Hast ings House Property to the I.T.D.C. Group and the Begumbari property to the Taj Group of Hotels.\nIn regard to the Begum bari property, it was stated: \"From the property of the Zoological Gardens on the Belvedere Road it is possible to carve out about four acres of land currently used for dump ing garbage and also for growing grass for the elephants.\nIt will be necessary and in any case advisable to shift the dumping ground.\nWhile adequate space can be made available for growing grass elsewhere in the same area.\n\" It was stated that the Finance and Tourism Departments had agreed to the proposal to lease the properties to the I.T.D.C. and the Taj Group respectively.\nIt was stated that though the Forest Department had suggested that Salt Lake was a better place for establishing a Five Star Hotel, there was no demand for a Five Star Hotel in that area and the request for a hotel in Salt Lake was confined to a Three Star Hotel.\nCabinet approval was sought for the offers to be made to the I.T.D.C. and to the Taj Group and for the constitution of a suitable Committee to undertake negotiations with the two groups.\nOn February 12, 1981, the Cabinet took a decision ap proving the proposal contained in the last paragraph of the Cabinet Memorandum, thus clearing the way for negotiations with the Taj Group.\nMeanwhile the Public Undertakings Committee appointed by the West Bengal Legislative Assembly submitted a report on 14.2.\n1981 about the Zoo.\nWhile suggesting that the govern ment may consider abandoning the proposal to set up a hotel on the eastern side of the zoo, the Committee also referred to a proposal to establish a \"Subsidiary Zoo\" some slight distance from Calcutta and the request said to have been made for the allotment of 200 acres of land for that pur pose.\nThe Chief Town Planner who visited the site at the request of the Secretary, Metropolitan Development Depart ment and in the presence of the Director of the Zoo, sug gested that 2 to 2 1/2 acres of land might be 226 made available for the Hotel.\nOn March 19, 1981 the Taj Group submitted a proposal to the government containing fairly detailed information about the tourism industry and its needs, the situation in Calcut ta, the realities of Hotel construction the facts relating to what had been done in other cities, the benefits i]owing out of the construction of hotels and their own proposals for constructing a hotel in the four acres of land in Belve dere Road.\nTwo alternative financial arrangements were suggested.\nThe first alternative was the payment of annual rent on the basis of the valuation of the land, the second alternative was based on the concept of nett sales, nett sales being defined as sales after deducting all taxes and levies and service charges.\nThe Metropolitan Development Department expressed a preference for the second alternative and suggested the constitution of a Committee.\nThe Finance Department also approved.\nThe Taj Group was invited to send the financial projection on the basis of the second alterna tive.\nCorrespondence went on.\nOn June 5, 1981 a Committee of Secretaries was formally constituted.\nIn the meanwhile WEBCON, a West Bengal Government Consultancy Undertaking, was asked to examine the proposals and to advise the Govern ment.\nOn June 11, 1981, the Managing Committee of the Zoo passed a resolution expressing itself against the proposal to construct a hotel on land belonging to the Zoo.\nAccepting the note put up by the Secretary Metropolitan Development Department on the said resolution the Chief Minister minuted that \"if further facilities are necessary for the zoo, the government will provide for them.\" On June 25, 1981, the Managing Committee met again and passed another resolution by which they withdrew their earlier objections dated 11.6.1981.\nOn June 29, 1981, the Director of the Zoo, who was a party to all the proceedings etc.\nright from the beginning wrote to the Secretary of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Services Department stating his objections to the proposal to lease the land for construction of a hotel.\nOn July 14, 1981, the WEBCON submitted its report and on the request of the Committee of Secretaries a further report was submitted on July 22, 1981.\nThe report of WEBCON is a comprehensive report on various topics connected with the establishment of a Five Star Hotel in Calcutta.\nAmong other things the report also suggested various financial alterna tives and recommended the second alternative based on nett sales as the best.\n227 Meanwhile negotiations with Taj Group proceeded apace.\nThe WEBCON submitted further reports.\nTaj Group suggested further modifications.\nOn September 9, 1981 a detailed memorandum was prepared for cabinet discussion.\nTwo alterna tive financial proposals were set out.\nA reference was made to the Committee of Secretaries who negotiated with the Taj Group of Hotels.\nNote was taken of the suggestion of the Negotiation Committee that the overall development plan for the environmental beautification, widening of approach roads, landscaping of Tolley 's Nullah were responsibilities of the State Government and estimated to cost Rs.2 crores but that it was expected to be of considerable public bene fit.\nStress was laid on the direct and indirect economic activities which would be generated by the establishment of a five Star Hotel.\nReference was also made to the report of WEBCON and it was noted that the projected profitability of the venture to the government was expected to be high.\nIt was also mentioned that the Ministers, incharge of Tourism, Animal Husbandry, Land Revenue and Finance had seen the note and had agreed to it.\nOn September 10, 1981 the Cabinet took the final decision to grant a ninety nine years lease of the four acres of Begumbari land to the Taj Group of Hotels.\nOn September 29, 1981 the Government of West Bengal officially conveyed its acceptance of the proposal of the Taj Group of Hotels for the construction of a Five Star Hotel.\nThe terms and conditions of the lease were set out.\nOn January 7.\n1982, there was a joint meeting of the Establishment and Finance sub Committees of the Zoo and it was decided to recommend to the Committee of management that the demarcated area of four acres may be relinquished in favour of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Services Department subject to the requirement that the zoo will continue to get the services and the facilities in the existing structures until they were reconstructed on the adjacent land.\nOn January 11, 1982 the Managing Committee endorsed the view of the sub commit tees and this was communicated to the government.\nOn January 15, 1982, the Government of West Bengal wrote to the Land Acquisition Officer, with copies to the Taj Group of Hotels directing the Land Acquisition Officer to give possession of the land to the Taj Group of Hotels subject to their later executing a proper long term lease.\nIt was mentioned in the letter that the construction of the Hotel should not be started till the lease deed was executed and registered.\nSeveral other stipulations were also made.\nThough the stipu lation was that the cost of the new construction was to be initially met by Taj Group of Hotels and later to be adjust ed against the rent payable by Taj Group, the Taj Group later agreed to waive such reimbursement (in fact a total sum of Rs.30 lakhs has been spent by Taj Group of Hotels in connections with the reconstruction.\nNot only this.\nland in the extent of 288 square 228 meters out of the plot given to them was carved out and given hack for accommodating part of the reconstructed structures.\nPursuant to the letter dated January 15, 1982 possession was given to Taj Group on January 16, 1982.\nThereafter an expert committee was constituted to supervise the construc tion of alternative facilities.\nFive petitioners a Trade Unionist, two life members of the Zoo, two other bonafide residents of Greater Calcutta, all lovers of wild life filed a petition in public interest on 26.2.1982.\nInitially the relief sought was primarily to restrain the Zoo authorities from giving effect to the two Resolutions dated January 7, 1982 and January 17, 1982 to hand over the four acres to the Animal Husbandry Department of the Government.\nSubsequent to the filing of the writ petition a lease deed was executed by the Taj Group of Hotels in favour of the government.\nThe Writ Petition was therefore amended and a prayer for cancellation was added.\nWhile the writ petition was pending in the High Court, Late Smt.\nIndira Gandhi wrote a letter to Sri Jyothi Basu, the Chief Minister of West Bengal expressing the hope that he would not allow the Calcutta Zoo to suffer in any manner and would leave it intact.\nThe Chief Minister in his reply letter dated 21.8.82 pointed out that:(i) the four acres of land were agreed to be relinquished by the Committee of management of the Zoological Garden on condition that alter native arrangement were made for shifting the existing structures which were necessary for the Zoo from the plot in question to the adjacent plot; (ii) the plot in question was not a part of the Zoo Garden; (iii) till the existing struc tures are relocated on the adjacent land, the zoo would continue to get their services and facilities from the existing structures.\n(iv) the hotel was not the only tall building since there existed many such residential buildings to which none raised an objection and that P&T Department are also constructing one such tall building; and (v) the lessee and their experts on wild life had assured them that in any case adequate precaution would be taken in regard to illumination of the hotel and the layout of the surrounding so that no disturbance would be caused to the flight path of the birds or animals.\nTo similar effect was .the letter dated 30.8.1982 from Shri J.R.D. Tata to the Prime Minister on September 1, 1982.\nIndira Gandhi wrote to Mr. Tata expressing her happiness that the hotel was not going to upset the Zoo animals and welcoming his offer to help the State Government to improve the Zoo 's facilities.\n229 A learned Single Judge of the High Court dismissed the writ petition holding that the West Bengal Government did not show any lack of awareness of the problem of environment ecology in granting the lease of land.\nOn appeal, a Division Bench confirmed the said judgment.\nHence the appeal by Special leave of the Court.\nDismissing the appeal, the Court, HELD: (Per Chinnappa Reddy J.) 1.1 Whenever a problem of ecology is brought before the Court, the Court is bound to bear in mind article 48 A of the Constitution the Directive Principle which enjoins that \"The State shall endeavour to protect and improve the environment and to safeguard the forests and wild life of the country, \"and article 51A(g) Which proclaims it to be the fundamental duty of every citizen of India \"to protect and improve the natural environment in cluding forest, lakes, rivers and wild life, and to have compassion for living creatures.\n\" When the Court is called upon to give effect to the Directive Principle and the fundamental duty, the Court is not to shrug its shoulders and say that priorities are a matter of policy and so it is matter for the policy making authority.\nThe least that the court may do is to examine whether appropriate considera tions are borne in mind irrelevancies excluded.\nIn appropri ate cases, the Court may go further, but how much further must depend on the circumstances of the case.\nThe court may always give necessary directions.\nHowever the Court will not attempt to nicely balance relevant considerations When the question involves the nice balancing of relevant considera tions, the court may feel justified in resigning itself to acceptance of the decision of the concerned authority.\nIf the Government is alive to the various considerations re quiring thought and deliberation and has arrived at a con scious decision after taking them into account, it may not be for the court to interfere in the absence of mala fides.\nOn the other hand, if relevant considerations are not borne in mind and irrelevant considerations influence the deci sion, the Court may interfere in order to prevent a likeli hood of prejudice to the public.\n[242B F] 1.2 Applying the above guidelines to be followed when questions of ecology and environment are raised, it is clear that the facts and circumstances brought out by the appel lants do not justify an inference that the construction of the proposed hotel in the Begumbari land would interfere in any manner with the animals in the Zoo and the birds arriv ing at the zoo or otherwise disturb the ecology.\nThe pro posed hotel is a Garden hotel and there is perhaps every chance of the ecology and environment improving as a result of planting numerous trees all 230 around the proposed hotel and the removal of the burial ground and dumping ground for rubbish.\n[263A B] 1.3 That the question of obstruction which may be caused to migratory birds did not go unnoticed by the government before the decision to lease the land was taken, is clear from the following: (i) the question of the migratory bird was first raised in the resolution of the Managing Committee dated June 11, 1981.\nThis resolution was forwarded to the Chief Minister and considered by him as evident from the note of the Chief Minister and the subsequent reversal of the Managing Committee 's resolution at the instance of the Chief Minister and on his assurance; (ii) that the govern ment was aware of the dissension based on the alleged ob struction likely to be caused by a multi storeyed building to the flight of the migratory birds appears from the letter of the Chief Minister to the Prime Minister.\nIn this letter, the Chief Minister pointed out that there were already in existence a number of multistoreyed buildings all around the Zoological Garden, but there was no report that they had any adverse effect on the migratory birds or the animals.\nHe also pointed out that all precautions would be taken in the matter of illumination of the hotel and lay out of the surroundings so that no disturbance would be caused to the flight path of the birds or animals; (iii) Shri J.R.D. Tata, on behalf of the Taj Group of Hotels also wrote to the Prime Minister assuring her that the hotel management had dis cussed the matter at length with a representative of the Wild Life Fund who, after discussion had been satisfied that the proposed hotel would cause no disturbance to the birds.\nHe further assured her that he had himself gone thoroughly in to the project with the special reference to the possible impact on the birds and the environment and had satisfied himself that project would not cause any disturbance to the birds or their free movement.\nHe pointed out that the four acre plot was not within the main Zoological Garden, but was separated from it by the Belvedere Road which was an impor tant thoroughfare in the city.\nIt was about 700 feet from the main part of the lake.\nThe hotel was proposed to be built away from the frontage of the plot in Belvedere Road and was to be a low rise structure, the highest point of which would not exceed 75 feet, far below the trajectory of the birds.\nHe mentioned that Dr. Biswas a renowned ornithol ogist had also been consulted by the Taj Management and he had also confirmed that a 75 feet building would not inter fere with the landing or climbing out of the birds from the lake.\nHe further mentioned that the grounds of the Zoo between the lake and the Belvedere Road were covered with tail trees and that the birds negotiating the trees would have to fly at a steeper angle than it would be necessary to negotiate the proposed hotel.\nThe vehicu 231 lar traffic on Belvedere Road which was also heavy did not bother the birds and the slight increase of the vehicular traffic consequent on the construction of the hotel was also not likely to bother them either.\nIt was also pointed out that particular care would be taken in the matter of illumi nation of the hotel so that bright lights or neon signs emanating from the hotel would not disturb the birds and animals.\nIn the circumstances, the government was alive to the ecological considerations particularly the question of the migratory birds.\n[260E H; 261A E] 2.1 It is wrong to think that every thing not mentioned in the Cabinet Memoranda did not receive consideration by the government.\nIn the instant case the process of choosing and allotting the land to the Taj Group of Hotels nearly took two years during the course of which objections of various kinds were raised from time to time.\nIt was not necessary that everyone of these objections should have been mentioned and considered in each of the Cabinet Memoranda.\n[260C E] 2.2 The proposition that a decision must be arrived at after taking into account all relevant considerations, eschewing all irrelevant considerations cannot for a moment be doubted.\nIn the instant case, relevant considerations were not ignored and indeed were taken into consideration by the Government of West Bengal.\nIt is not one of those cases where the evidence is first gathered and a decision is later arrived at one flue morning and the decision is incorporated in a reasoned order.\nThis is a case where discussion had necessarily to stretch over a long period of time.\nSeveral factors have to be independently and separately weighed and considered.\nThis is a case where the decision and the rea sons for the decision could only be gathered by looking at the entire course of events and circumstances stretching over the period from the initiation of the proposal to the taking of the final decision.\nThe argument that what was not said in either of the Cabinet Memoranda could not later be supplemented by considerations which were never present in the mind of the decision making authority is not correct.\n[263E G] Rohtas Industries Ltd. vs S.D. Agarwal, ; and Barium Chemicals vs A.G. Rana, ; , re ferred to.\nMohinder Singh Gill vs Central Election Commission, , distinguished.\nThere was no failure to observe the principles of Natural Justice.\nSuch as those as were really interested in the matter like the Managing Committee of the Zoological Garden and the Director of the 232 Zoo did have their say in the matter.\nThe Public Undertak ings Committee in its report discussed the matter and invit ed the Government 's attention to various factors.\nThe matter was further discussed on the floor of the Legislative Assem bly.\n[264B D] 4.1 The two letters dated 23.4. 1880 and 7.7. 1880, pertaining to the grant relating to the transfer of land to the east of Belvedere Road, known as Begumbari land in 1880, produced from old official records, are public documents within the meaning of the Evidence Act.\nNo objection either to the authenticity or to the admissibility of the documents was taken either before the Single Judge or before the Division Bench.\nThe Managing Committee of the Zoological Garden never doubted the authenticity of the documents, nor was any question even raised to suggest that the terms of the grant were other than those mentioned in the letters.\n[265C E] 4.2 The new plea relating to authenticity or admissibil ity of evidence cannot be accepted in an appeal under article 136 of the Constitution.\nThe land which was undoubtedly government land was given to the Zoological Garden upon the terms set out in the two letters.\nOne of the terms was that the land should be restored to the government whenever required.\nAnother terms was that the Zoological Garden Committee would be suitably compensated for any expenditure incurred by it on the construction of any building on the land.\n[265E] 5.1 It is true that the Act of the legislature cannot be undone by a mere act of the Executive.\nThis is not a case where the statute vests land in the Committee and the Execu tive takes it away by its fiat.\nThe Begumbari land was government land transferred to the charge of the Zoological Garden Committee in 1880 in accordance with the conditions and terms agreed to by the Committee in their letter dated 23.4.1880; namely; \"(i) that the land is to be used for the purpose of acclimatization only; (ii) that Carnivors are not to be kept on any part of it, on any account; (iii) that the grounds are to be kept clear and neat; (iv) that the land must be restored to the government if hereafter required.\nThe Zoological Garden Committee being reimbursed for any expenditure they may have incurred in building there.\n\" Therefore, this is a case of resumption of Government land under the terms of Agreement.\n[264E H; 265A B] 5.2 From the Preamble and the provisions of the Bengal Public Parks Act, 1904, it is clear that the Act is intended to protect the inmates and the property of the park from injury by persons resorting 233 to the park from molestations or annoyance by others.\nThe Act is aimed at protecting the part and its visitors from injury and annoyance by despoilers and marauders.\nThe Act has nothing whatever to do with the vesting of any property in the parks.\nThere is in fact no provision which deal with the vesting of property in a park, Section 3 enables the State Government to extend by a notification, the boundaries of a park but that can only be for the purposes of the Act and not for the purpose of vesting or creating any title in a property.\nIf a piece of adjacent land, for example, is taken on lease for a specified number of years by the park and included in the park by a notification under s.3 it does not mean that the various things, the doing of which is regulated or prohibited by the Act and the rule will not be done or will be regulated on the adjacent land also.\nThe provisions of the Bengal Public Parks Act have no relevance to the question of the power of the government to transfer the Begumbari land to the Taj Group of Hotels.\n[266C F] 6.1 Statutes and statutory orders have no doubt to be obeyed.\nIt does not mean that other orders, instructions, etc. may be departed from in an individual case, if applica ble to the facts.\nThey are not to be ignored until amended.\nThe government or the Borad may have the power to amend these orders and instructions, but nonetheless they must be obeyed so long as they are in force and are applicable.\nBut, from the perusal of the provisions of paragraphs 165 to 167 of the West Bengal Land Management Manual, it is clear that these provisions of the Land Management Manual do not appear to have anything to do with the transfer and use of the land in the manner proposed, in which the State also have a vital stake apart from the mere raising of revenue for the State.\nParagraphs 165, 166 and 167 deal with simple cases of crea tion of non agricultural tenancies by way of long term leases.\nThey generally deal with land which is at the dis posal of the government as waste or surplus land and are intended to secure the best revenue for the State.\nThey do not deal with cases of transfer of land for a specific socio economic object, where, the securing of immediate revenue.\nis not the principal object but other social and economic benefits are sought.\n[267E H] 6.2 The following propositions may be taken as well established on a considerations of the earlier decisions of the Supreme Court.\nState owned or public owned property is not to be dealt with at the absolute discretion of he execu tive.\nCertain precepts and principles have to be observed.\nPublic interest is the paramount consideration.\nOne of the methods of securing the public interest, when it is consid ered necessary to dispose of a property, is to sell the property by public auction or by inviting tenders.\nThough that is the ordinary rule.\nit is not an invariable 234 rule.\nThere may be situations where there are compelling reasons necessitating departure from the rule, but then the reasons for the departure must be rational and should not be suggestive of discrimination.\nAppearance of public justice is as important as doing justice.\nNothing should be done which gives an appearance of bias, jobbery or nepotism.\n[273D F] 6.3 Applying the above tests, it cannot be held that the government of West Bengal did not act with probity in not inviting tenders or in not holding a public auction but negotiating straight away at arm 's length with the Taj Group of Hotels, in its pursuit or socio economic objective of encouraging tourism and earning more foreign exchange.\nIn the present case no one has come forward alleging that he has been discriminated against and his fundamental right to carry on business had been affected.\nThe very nature of the construction and establishment of a Five Star Hotel is indicative of a requirement of expertise and sound financial position on the part of those who might offer to construct and establish them.\nThe decision taken by the All India Tourism Council was an open decision well known to everyone in the hotel business.\nYet no one except the I.T.D.C. and the Taj Group of Hotels had come forward with any proposal.\nThe Oberoi Group of Hotels already had a Five Star Hotel in Calcutta while the Welcome Group of Hotels were making their own Private negotiations and arrangements for establishing a Five Star Hotel.\nIn the circumstances, particularly in the absence of any leading hotliers coming forward, the govern ment of West Bengal was perfectly justified in entering into negotiation with the I.T.D.C. and the Taj Group of Hotels instead of inviting tenders.\nNegotiations with those who had come forward with proposals to construct Five Star Hotels was without doubt the most reasonable and rational way of proceeding in the matter rather than inviting tenders or holding public auction.\nThere was nothing discriminatory in the procedure adopted since no other leading hotlier had shown any inclination to come forward.\nTenders and auction were most impractical in the circumstances.\nThe choice of the Taj Group of Hotels must therefore be held to be beyond suspicion and above reproach.\n[273F; 268D F] Rash Bihari Panda vs State of Orissa, ; R.B. Shetry vs International Airport Authority, 14; Kasturi Lal Laxmi Reddy vs State of Jammu & Kashmir, ; ; State of Haryana vs Jaga Ram, ; Ram and Shvam Co. vs State of Haryana, ; and Chenchu Rami Redav vs Go/vt.\nof Andhra Pradesh, [1986] 3 SCC 391, discussed.\n7.1 On a consideration of all the facts and circumstances of the 235 case, it is clear, that the government of West Bengal acted perfectly bonafide in granting the lease of Begumbari land to the Taj Group of Hotels for the construction of a Five Star Hotel in Calcutta.\nThe government of West Bengal did not fail to take into account any relevant consideration.\nIts action was not against the interest of the Zoological Garden or not in the best interests of the animal inmates of the zoo or migrant birds visiting the zoo.\nThe financial interests of the State were in no way sacrificed either by not inviting tenders or holding a public auction or by adopting the ' 'nett sales\" method.\n[274C E] 7.2 The \"nett sales\" method appears to be fairly well known method adopted in similar situations.\nThis what was recommended by WEBCON, the consulting agency of the West Bengal Government which submitted a detailed report on the subject.\nThis was also the recommendation of the Committee of Secretaries who went into the matter in death, even to lay persons who are no financial experts, it appears that the \"nett sales\" method does and the rent based on market value method does not take into account the appreciating value of land, the inflationary tendency of the prices and the profit orientation.\nEven on a prima a facie view, there appears to be nothing wrong.\nor objectionable in the \"nett sales\" method.\nIt is profit oriented and appears to be in the best interests of the Government of West Bengal.\n[274A C] Per Kahlid J. (concurring) 1.\nToday public spirited litigants rush to courts to file cases in profusion under attractive name Public Inter est Litigation.\nThey must inspire confidence in courts and amongst the public.\nThey must be above suspicions.\nPublic Interest Litigation has now come to stay.\nBue one is led to think that it poses a threat to courts and public alike.\nSuch cases are now filed without any rhyme or reason.\nIt is, therefore, necessary to lay down clear guide lines and to outline the correct parameters for entertainment of such petitions.\nIf courts do not restrict the free flow of such cases in the name of Public Interest Litigations, the tradi tional litigation will suffer and the courts of law, instead of dispensing justice, will have to take upon themselves administrative and executive functions.\nThis does not mean that traditional litigation should stay put.\nThey have to be tackled by other effective methods, like decentralising the judicial system and entrusting majority of traditional litigation to village courts and Lok Adalats without the usual populist stance and by a complete restructuring of the procedural law which is the villain in delaying disposal of cases.\nIt is only when courts are apprised of gross viola tion of fundamental rights by a group or a class action or when 236 basic human rights are invaded or when there are complaints of such acts as shock the judicial conscience that the courts, especially this Court, should leave aside procedural shackles and hear such petitions and extend its jurisdiction under all available provisions for remedying the hardships and miseries of the needy, the under dog and the neglected.\nExtending help when help is required does not mean that the doors of the Supreme Court are always open to anyone to walk in.\nIt is necessary to have some self imposed restrained on public interest litigants, so that this salutary type of litigation does not lose its credibility.\n[275C; 279A F] 2.\nThe approach of the Taj Group Hotels in this case has been creditably fair.\nThey have given all the assurances necessary to preserve the Zoo and its inmates.\nThey were willing to afford all the requisite safeguards.\nIn the place of a dilapidated hospital, operation theater and the like, they constructed buildings, a new at a cost of Rs. 30 lakhs which amount they were entitled to be reimbursed under cl. 25 of the lease, which they voluntarily gave up.\nIn addition to this, they surrendered an area of 288 sq. metrs.\nfrom the land allotted to them to the Zoo.\nThey agreed to build not the usual sky scrapper hotel, but a garden hotel, the height of which would not go beyond 75 feet, despite the fact that there existed in the surroundings area buildings which were very high.\nThis was done to keep free the route of the flight of the birds.\nThey agreed to have subdued light in the hotel, again in the ineterest of the birds.\nThey also agreed to keep the surroundings of the hotel and the flora well maintained and already 30,000 plants were getting ready to adjourn the area to be occupied by them.\n[277H; 278A C] 3.1 Regarding the commercial and financial aspects of the lease also, there is nothing secretive.\nThe method adopted is the nett sales method of calculating the compen sation paid, which is a well known method adopted in such situations like the one, here namely lease of land by the Government.\n[278C E] 3.2 A deal like the one is given cannot be concluded by public auction as it is not a case of sale of a government property.\nBeing not a sale but a lease of land by the gov ernment public auction has necessarily to be ruled out.\nOnly Taj Group of Hotels came forward with an offer to start the hotel.\nThe lease was the culmination after a long, elaborate and open procedure with nothing to hide which therefore cannot justifiably be subject to adverse criticism.\n[278G H]", + "5248": "The Income Tax Officer included in the net wealth of the respondent assessee for the assessement year 1957 58, two sums, viz., Rs. 1,50,000 and Rs.67,560/12/ which the asses see claimed to have gifted.\nIt is stated that on January 1, 1957 the respondent assessee, by a letter directed a company in which he maintained an account, to debit his account to the extent of Rs. 1,50,000 and credit in the names of his two sons and grandsons various sums, as he had decided to give away these amounts to them out of love and affection.\nThe company carried out the instructions and relevant debit and credit entries were made in the respective accounts.\nOn the same day, by two separate letters, the gifts were ac cepted by the sons and later on these amounts were withdrawn by the respective donees.\nIn the case of second gift, oral instructions were given for transferring the amounts stand ing to his credit.\nThe respondent assessee having failed before the Income Tax Officer and the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, ap pealed to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and contended that the first company was carrying on the business of banking and hence the gifts in question were valid, and that the Income Tax Officer and the Appellate Assistant Commis sioner had wrongly included these amounts in his net wealth and in the case of second gift, the assessee claimed that the amounts were gifted by him by transfer entries.\nThe Tribunal found that there was no evidence that the first company was carrying on any banking business, and in the case of second gift, the sum was available with the company.\nIt, therefore, held that the first company was not carrying on banking business, and in the 122 second case, there was no valid gift.\nIt, however, referred the matter to the High Court.\nThe High Court held that the Tribunal was not right in holding that the assessee did not make valid gifts and in holding that the amounts were rightly included in the net wealth of the assessee.\nAllowing the appeal by the Revenue, this Court, HELD: 1.\nIn order to constitute a valid gift there must be an existing property.\nIn case of entries in the books of account by credit and debit, the sums should be available on the date of gift in the account of the firm whose accounts are said to be credited or debited.\nIn the case of banking companies or other firms and companies who have overdraft facilities, even if the sums are not in credit of the donor and are not with such companies or firms, gifts might be possible by adjustment of book entries.\nBut in the cases of non banking companies or firms, if these companies or firms do not have overdraft facilities, it is not possible to make valid gift if sums or funds are not available.\n[126E G] 2.\nIt is possible in certain circumstances for a donor to make a valid gift by instructing a firm or a company or H.U.F., in which the donor has an account to give effect to the gift by debiting his account and crediting the account in the name of the donee.\nBut in such cases merely book entries would not suffice.\nThe circumstances must be such as to make it clear that there were sufficient funds at the disposal of the donor by reason of which he could make the gift by such book entries.\nThe firm in which the donor may have account may or may not have sufficient cash balance but it must have sufficient provision for overdraft with the bank on the basis of which it could honour instructions given by the assessee.\n[126H;127A B] 3.\nEach case must be decided on the facts of that case.\nWhere the assessee has a credit account with a firm or with a family or with a banking company and that sum is available to that firm or the company or H.U.F. on the date of the gift, then a valid gift by book entries might be possible.\nBut where a sum was not available with the firm or the H.U.F. or a company which was not a banking company or which had no overdraft facility, by mere book entries, even though there was acceptance of that gift by the donee a valid gift would not be effectuated.\n[131D E] 4.\nIn the instant case, the entries in the books of account could not effectuate valid gifts.\nThe only sum which could be taken by the donee was Rs.4,000 in the case of the first company, which had no 123 overdraft facility with the bank.\nThus, there was no exist ing goods to be parted.\nThe High Court was, therefore, in error in answering the questions against the Revenue.\n[132E F] [Appeal allowed.\nOrder and Judgment of the High Court set aside.] Gopal Raj Swarup v, Commissioner of Wealth tax, Lucknow, 12; Indian Glass Agency vs Commissioner of Income Tax, New Delhi, ; New India Colour Co. vs Commissioner of Income Tax, New Delhi, ; Commissioner of Income Tax, West Bengal 111 vs Ashok Glass Works, ; Commissioner of Gift Tax, West Bengal 111 vs Tarachand Meghraj, ; Chimanbhai Lalbhai vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Bombay, 34 I.T.R. 259; Commissioner of Income Tax, Ahmedabad vs Digvijay singhji Tin Factory, ; Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay City I1 vs Popatlal Mulji, ; Addl.\nCommissioner of Income Tax, Poona vs Dharsev Keshavji, ; Commissioner of Income Tax, Poona vs Devinchand Uttamchand, ; Baliram Mathuradas (By his Legal Heir, Madanlal Paliram) vs Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay City H, ; Virji Devshi vs Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay, ; E.M.V. Muthappa Chet tiar vs Commisioner of Income Tax, Madras, ; Mrs. Ida L. Chambers and Three Others vs Kelland Huxford Chambers, ; Balimal Nawal Kishore vs Commis sioner of Income Tax, Punjab, ; Sukhlal Sheo Narain vs Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Haryana, 89 I.T.R. 157; Abba Dada and Company vs Commissioner of Income Tax, Burma, ; K.P. Brothers vs Commissioner of In come tax, New Delhi, ; Commissioner of Income Tax, U.P.v. Smt. 'Shyamo Bibi, ; Commissioner of Wealth Tax vs Gulab Rai Govind Prasad, ; Bhau Ram Jawaharmal vs Commissioner of Income Tax, ' U.P., ; Gopal Jalan vs Commissioner of Income Tax, U.P., ; Phool Chand Gajanand vs Commissioner of Income Tax, U.P., ; Controller of Estate Duty, Punjab, Haryana, J. & K., H.P. and Chandigarh vs Kamlavati, , referred to.", + "2304": "The Orissa Superior Judicial Service consisted of 15 posts.\n10 of which were District and Sessions Judges or Additional District and Sessions Judges; of the other five, one was Registrar of the High Court and four were officers of the State Government.\nP, one of the District and Sessions Judges was posted as Superintendent and Legal Remembrance in March 1962.\nB. an Additional Judge.\nwas posted as Joint Secretary in the Law Department in the same month and sometime thereafter was posted as Superintendent and Legal Remembrance.\nD, a District and Sessions judge was posted in January 1962 as member.\nSales Tax Tribunal, which was a non cadre post.\nIn February 1965 the High Court took a policy decision to the effect that as a general rule, judicial officers working in special posts.\nwhether cadre or non cadre.\noutside their regular line, should be called to the regular line after the completion of three years in the interest of the service as well as the officers, so that the officers did not become out of touch with judicial work.\nAlthough this policy decision was accepted by the State Government.\nit was not implemented ' in respect of P, B and D.\nThe High Court being under the impression at the time that in law the Governor was the sole authority to effect the necessary transfers.\ndid not take any action itself.\nAfter the decision of this Court in Ranga Mohammad 's case ; holding that the power to transfer Judges presiding over Courts vested with the High Court under article 235 of the Constitution.\nthe High Court. issued an order on October 10.\ntransferring P. B and D to judicial posts and posting to the administrative posts in their place, K. T and M who were doing judicial work till then.\nIn pursuance of those orders K. T and M handed over charge of the posts they were holding and reported to the Secretariat for assuming charge of the administrative posts to which they were assigned.\nbut the Government refused to accept them.\nThe State Government directed P. B and D to continue in the posts they were previously holding and those officers acted in accordance with the orders of the Government.\nConsequently.\nsome of the Sessions Divisions in the State were without District and Sessions Judges for several days and some Advocates practising in those Divisions filet/petitions before the High Court for a writ of mandamus against the Government.\nas well as the concerned officers to implement the transfers ordered by the High Court.\nThey also sought a writ of quo warranto against P. B and D questioning the authority under which they were holding the administrative posts held by them until then.\nThe High Court allowed the petition and directed the Governments to implement its orders forthwith.\nThe Government implemented these orders on March 6.\n1967 and thereafter appealed to this Court, by special leave.\n155 HELD: (i) Although the High Court was within its powers.\nin posting P. B and D, the three officers holding administrative posts.\nas District and Sessions Judges, it was beyond its powers to post in their places three other officers to the administrative posts.\nJust as the executive cannot know the requirements of a particular court, the High Court cannot also know the requirements of any post in the Secretariat.\nIt is for the Executive to say whether a particular officer would meet its requirements or not.\nThe High Court cannot foist an officer on the Government.\n[163C D] While sparing the service of any judicial officer to the government it is open to the High Court to fix the period during which he may hold any executive post.\nAt the end of that period, the government is bound to allow him to go back to his parent department unless the High Court agrees to spare his services for some more time.\nIn other words, the period during which a judicial officer should serve in an executive post must be settled by agreement between the High Court and the government.\nIf there is no such agreement it is open to the Government to send him back to his parent department at any time it pleases.\nIt is equally open to the High Court to recall him whenever it thinks [163 F H] It was not the case of the contesting respondents that P, B and D did ' not have the necessary qualifications to hold the posts that they were holding or that they had not been validly appointed to those posts.\nIn these circumstances the High Court could not have held that they had no authority to hold the posts in question.\n[159D] State of Assam vs Ranga Mohammad and Ors. ; ; State of West Bengal vs Nripendra Nath Baghi; ; ; explained and distinguished.\n(ii) A decision is only an authority for what it actually decides.\nWhat is of the essence in a decision is its ratio and not other observations found therein nor what logically follows from the various observations made in it.\n[162E F] Quin vs Leathem, ; ; referred to.", + "6881": "The appellant seeking to exercise the right of pre emption as a co sharer, i.e. father 's brother 's son of the vendors, contended that he fell within the expression 'other co sharers ' in clause 'Fourthly ' of section 15(1)(b) of the Punjab pre emption Act, 1913 and was, therefore, entitled to exercise the right of pre emption.\nThe courts below negatived his contention following the decision of this Court in Jagdish & Ors.\nvs Nathi Mal Kej riwal & Ors.\n; , In this appeal filed by special leave, the appellant submitted that since the suit land belonged to more than one co sharer and had not been sold jointly by all the co shar ers, he, as a co sharer, as entitled to claim the right of pre emption under clause 'fourthly 'of section 15(1)(b) and that in Jagdish 's case, the interpretation placed on the expression 'other co shar ers ' in section 15(1)(b) required reconsideration.\nAllowing the appeal, this Court, HELD: 1.\nAccording to section 15 of the Act before its amendment in 1960, in the case of sale of share out of joint land or property, the right of pre emption was conferred firstly on the lineal descendants of the vendor in order of succession; secondly, in the co sharers, if any, who are agnates, in order of succession; thirdly, in persons not included under firstly or secondly above, in order of suc cession, who but for such sale would be entitled, on death of the 120 vendor, to inherit the land or property sold and fourthly, in the cosharers.\n[126 E F] 2.\nSection 15 after its amendment in 1960 provided that where the sale is of a share out of the joint land or property and is not by all the co sharers jointly, the right of pre emption was vested, first, in the sons or daughters or son 's son or daughter 's sons of the vendor or vendors; Secondly, in the brothers or brother 's sons of the vendor or vendors; Thirdly, in the father 's brother or father 's broth er 's sons of the vendor or vendors; Fourthly, in the other cosharers and Fifthly, in the tenants.\n[126 F G] 3.\nThe legislature desired to confer the right of pre emption on specified family members of the vendor or vendors in the first three clauses of section 15(1)(b) and with a view to covering all the remaining co sharers not specifi cally mentioned in the preceding clauses it used the expres sion 'other co sharers ' in the fourth clause which was meant to serve as a residuary clause to ensure that no cosharer is left out.\n[126 G 127 A] 4.\nThe expression 'other co sharers ' was used in the fourth clause of the said provision to ensure that no co sharer was left out or omitted and not to deny the right to kinsfolk co sharers covered by the preceding clauses.\nIf the preceding clauses were not erased from the statute book as unconstitutional the kinsfolk would have exercised the right in the order of preference, for which no justification was found.\nThe relations in the first three clauses of section 15(1)(b) may or may not be co sharers.\nThe use of the ex pression 'other ' in clause fourthly conveys the possibility of their being cosharer also.\n[127 D F] 5.\nThe purport of Atam Prakash 's case was that while cosharers were entitled to pre empt, the conferment of that right on certain kinsfolk based on the rule of consanguinity being a relic of the feudal past could not be tolerated.\nThis Court never intended to exclude any specified co owners from the scope of clause fourthly of section 15(1)(b) of the Act.\nOnce conferment of the right of preemption in favour of co sharers was considered to be a reasonable restriction on the right to hold, acquire and dispose of property under Article 19(1)(f), the same restriction was held to be valid when tested on the touchstone of Articles 14 or 15 of the Constitution.\n[127 B D] 121 6.\nWhat this Court disapproved as offensive to Articles 14 and 15 is the classification based on consanguinity and not on co ownership.\nThe right of pre emption to co sharers is held to be intra vires the Constitution.\nTherefore, it is difficult to hold that this Court intended to deny the right of pre emption of those kinsfolk even if they happened to be co sharers, That would clearly be discriminatory.\n[127 F G] 7.\nThe interpretation placed on clause 'fourthly ' of section 15(1)(b) of the Act by this court in Jagdish 's case was not correct on a proper construction of that clause after the preceding clause were held to be unconstitutional, the word 'other ' preceding the word 'co sharer ' is rendered redundant.\n[127 G] Ram Sarup vs Munshi & Ors., ; = ; ; Atam Prakash vs State of Haryana & Ors., ; = ; ; Bhau Ram vs\nB. Baijnath Singh, = ; , referred to.\nJagdish & Ors.\nvs Nathi Mal Kejriwal & Ors., ; , over ruled.", + "6668": "Respondent No. 1 adopted petitioner appellant, who married two wives and through the first wife he had a son, the respondent No. 2 and through the second, another son, the respondent No. 3.\nDuring the pendency of the special leave petition the adoptive mother of appellant died.\nRespondent 2 and 3 laid claim to the entire property of respondent No. 1 exclusively under two different wills said to be by the respondent No. 1 and each contended that the other will was a forged one.\nOn the death of the adoptive mother, the appellant laid claim to her entire property as heir.\nWhile each of the parties had taken such stand, in the litigation a compromise was brought about on 21.8.1987 between the appellant and his two sons, the respondents 2 and 3 and the same was filed in this Court and in terms of the compromise the appellant, to make payment of Rs. 1 lakh to each of his two sons in lieu of relinquishment of their interest.\nWhen the matter was listed for recording the compromise, the respondent No. 2 contended that as he had not been paid Rs. 1 lakh as stipulated in the compromise, in the meanwhile he had alienated about 81 acres of the suit properties to the third parties.\nThe alienees had been also impleaded as parties under the orders of this Court.\nDisposing of the petition, this Court, HELD: 1.\nOnce the Court was satisfied that there was a compromise it was for the Court to record the same and no option lay before the Court to act otherwise.\n[542A B] 539 2.\nAs the compromise petition in the instant case is genuine nd lawful the same has to be acted upon.\n[542B] 3.\nIt is directed that the compromise petition shall be accepted and in terms thereof the suit shall be disposed of and the terms of the compromise shall form part of the order to be drawn up in this Court for disposing of the special leave petition.\n[542B C] 4.\nWith a view to settling all equities between the parties, directed that the appellant to pay a sum of Rs.1 lakh more to respondent No. 2 within eight weeks.\nRs. 77,124 being the amount paid by the alienees before the Sub Registrar in respect of the sale deeds shall be deposited.\n[542C E] 5.\nThe alienees have no right created under the alleged sale deeds.\nTheir possession is without authority of law and clarified that none of the sale deeds is valid.\n[542F H] 6.\nThe alienees shall deliver vacant possession of the property by 30th of April, 1991, and in the event of failure to do so the Trial Court directed to deliver vacant possession.\n[543A B] Bhoja Govinda Maikap & Anr.\nvs Janaki Dei & Ors., , approved.", + "3531": "The workmen 's demand for grant of sick leave and its accumulation upto a period was rejected by the employers on the ground that the provided more than adequate sickness benefits, and that any additional benefits would place a financial burden on the industry and would adversely affect other industries in the region.\nThe Tribunal, to which the dispute was referred, partly granted the workmen 's demand.\nOn appeal to this Court it was contended that section 61 of the debarred a person enti tled to any of the benefits under that Act from receiving similar benefit under the provisions of any other Act and as such the workmen were not entitled to the benefit of sick leave.\nDismissing the appeals, HELD: (1) The , does not deal with the question of sick leave.\nThe scheme of the benefits admissible under the Act does not cover the work men 's demand for sick leave to the extent allowed by the Tribunal.\nSection 61 is not applicable because the benefits granted by the Tribunal are not similar to those admissible under the Act.\n[84 C] The Hindustan Times Ltd., New Delhi vs Their Workmen [1964] 1 SCR 234 and Technological Institute of Textiles vs Its Workmen and others applied.\n(2) Sickness benefit under the Act cannot be said to be adequate, for, it works out to about half the average wage of a workman which benefit is not admissible for the first two days of sickness except under the conditions provided in the Act.\nA workman is prevented from earning the normal daily wages during the period of his illness and there is no justification for the argument that the rate of benefit at about half his wage, under the Act, should be considered sufficient so as to deny him the benefit of sick leave on full emoluments for a period of 7 days when he is certi fied by a competent medical officer to be ill for that or a longer period.\nSickness is a serious misfortune to a work man for it not only prevents him from earning his normal wages, but is a drain on his meagre financial resources by way of additional expenditure on food, nursing and visits to the medical centre etc.\n[84 E F] (3) The Tribunal could not be said to have erred in restoring the benefit which the workmen were receiving under an earlier award.\nThe benefit of sick leave to the employ ees in the region was lost when the Act was made applicable to the region from December 14, 1969.\nThis was obviously under a mistaken impression.\nThe Act does not deal with all aspects of sickness benefit and does not provide for the grant of leave on full emoluments during the period of a workman 's physical incapacity to earn his normal wages because of his sickness.\n[85 B C] (4) There is no force in the argument that the Tribunal had granted additional privilege leave for 7 days under the garb of sick leave because by its very nature sick leave would be admissible only in the case of actual sickness certified by a registered medical practitioner.\n[86 B] (5) There is no evidence to show that the benefit had not been allowed by other companies in the region.\nThe Tribunal had examined the financial 81 capacity of the companies and had given adequate reasons for holding that they were in good financial position and could bear the additional burden.\n[85 H] (6) It has not been shown that the awards are illegal or unjust, or would adversely affect the economy or the indus trial peace, or lead to imbalance in the conditions of service in other industrial establishments.\n[86 C]", + "415": "Appellant was detained under section 3(1)(a)(i) of the Preventive Detention Act, Act IV of 1950 on the grounds that with the financial help given by the Portuguese authorities he was carrying on espionage on their behalf with the help of underground workers and that he was also collecting intelligence about the security arrangements on the border area and was making such intelligence available to the Portuguese authorities.\nAppellant made no application to the Government for further particulars.\nHeld, that in these circumstances and having regard to the fact that what is alleged is espionage activity, the grounds could not be considered to be vague.\nIn answer to the objection in the writ application before the High Court that the grounds were not specific and that no particular of the alleged activities of the appellant were given the Under Secretary to the Government in his affidavit claimed privilege under article 22(6) of the Constitution.\nHeld, that the right of the detenue to be furnished particulars is subject to the limitation under article 22(6).\nHence even if the grounds are vague due to the reason that facts cannot be disclosed in the public interest, the order of detention cannot be challenged on the ground of such vagueness.\nThe necessity of communicating the decision to claim privilege under article 22(6) would arise only when the detenue asks for parti 383 culars.\nIn the absence of any such request by the detenue, the noncommunication of the decision cannot be hold to have hampered his constitutional right to make his representation.\nMala fides must be made out against the detaining authority and not against the police.\nThe contention of mala fides is untenable in the present case having regard to the nature of the grounds and to the nature of the activities imputed to the appellant.", + "3019": "The respondent, a commissioned officer in the Indian Army, was found to have committed acts of gross misconduct by a Court of Inquiry.\nThe Chief of the Army Staff was of the opinion that his trial by a General Court Martial was inexpedient, and the respondent was removed from service after following the procedure under r. 14 of the Army Rules, 1954.\nOn the question whether r. 14, which gives power to the Central Government to remove an officer without being tried and convicted by Court Martial was in derogation of section 45, , which specifically provides for conviction by court martial and punishment for unbecoming conduct, HELD : The rule is not ultra vires.\n[451 D] (1) Section 19 of the Act provides that subject to the provisions of the Act and the rules made thereunder the Central Government may remove from service, any person subject to the Act.\nTherefore, the section itself suggests that there should be rules regarding removal from service, and section 191 (2) (a) of the Act specifically gives power to make a rule providing for the removal from the service of persons subject to the Act.\n[450 H; 451 A B] (2) Although section 19 uses the words \"subject to the provisions of this Act\", the section is not subject to section 45.\nThe power under section 19 is independent of the power under section 45, because, while section 19 speaks of removal of a person, section 45 provides that on conviction by Court Martial an officer is liable to be cashiered or to suffer such less punishment as is in the Act mentioned.\n[451 B D]", + "2248": "The appellant Panchayat levied octroi duty on goods coming within its limits by following the procedure laid down in rr. 3 and 4 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Taxes and Fees Rules 1960.\nAlthough the resolution finally levying octroi was passed on February 25, 1963 and the octroi limits were fixed by resolution dated March 17, 1963 the approval of the Collector to the octroi limits as required by r. 21 was not obtained till January 14, 1964.\nWhen the Panchayat began collecting octroi on April 1, 1963 the respondent company appealed under section 124(5) of the Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958 to the Panchayat Samita.\nThe appeal was rejected as it was considered time barred under r. 5 of the Taxes & Fees Rules which required an appeal under section 124(5) of the Act to be filed within 60 days of the publication of the notice under r. 4.\nOn further appeal the Standing Committee, Zila Parishad, Nagpur decided in favour of the respondent company on the ground that the Panchayat had not complied with r. 21.\nThe Panchayat filed a writ petition under article 226 of the Constitution.\nThe High Court upheld the findIng of the Standing Committee as to the effect of non compliance with r. 21.\nIt however further held that r. 5 in requiring all appeals under a. 124(5) of the Act to be filed within 60 days of the publication of the notice under section 4 was arbitrary and destructive of the right of appeal and therefore ultra vires.\nThe Panchayat appealed to this Court.\nHeld: (i) Octroi can be validly levied under r. 22 after following the procedure in rr.\n3 and 4 Rule 3 deals only with (i) selection of the tax and (ii) the rate at which it is to be levied.\nRule 4 deals with final publication of the notice levying octroi.\nThe levy of octroi under r. 22 read with rr. 3 and 4 does not require prior approval to the octroi limits by the Collector under r. 21.\n[219D H; 220A C].\n(ii) However the octroi cannnot be validly collected before the octroi limits are approved by the Collector under r. 21.\nCollections made earlier cannot be regularised by subsequent approval.\nThe plea on behalf of the appellant that the approval of the Collector on January 14, 1964 should relate back to April 1, 1963 could not be accepted.\n[220 D E].\n(iii) Rule 5 is not invalid as it does not apply to all appeals under, section 124(5).\nThe rule follows rr. 3 and 4 and is headed \"appeal against levy of any tax or fee,\" and the period of sixty days of limitation commences from the date of the publication of the notice 214 under r. 4 i.e. the notice following the decision of a Panchayat to levy any tax or fee.\nThis date shows that r. 5 is dealing only with appeals against levy of any tax and not with the assessment or imposition of a tax or any further appeals to the Panchayat Samiti under section 124(5).\nIn its context and setting the heading of r. 5 brings out the scope of the rule, [220 F H].\nAccordingly the appeal of the company to the Samiti was wrongly dismissed as time barred.\nIt followed from this that the Standing Committee was entitled to deal with the appeal on merits.\n[220 H].", + "715": "Conciliation proceedings were started in January.\n1952 with respect to some disputes between appellant 1 and its workmen.\nOn May 9, 1952, the Union and on June 2, 1952, the appellant 1 indicated to the Conciliation Officer that the negotiations had failed.\nIn the meantime on March ~I8, 1952, the appellant 1 dismissed (1) I.L.R. 1947 All.\n735 one of its workmen.\nThe two appellants and three others were prosecuted under section 31 Of the , for a breach of section 33 for dismissing a workman during the pendency of the conciliation proceedings.\nThe appellants contended that since section 12(6) required the report of the conciliation proceedings to be submitted within 14 days of the commencement thereof, the proceedings had terminated on the expiry of the 14 days and the dismissal was, therefore, not during the pendency of the conciliation proceedings.\nHeld that, in cases where no settlement was arrived at the conciliation proceedings terminated when the report of the Conciliation Officer was received by the appropriate Government and not on the expiry of 14 days from the commencement of the proceedings.\nThe commencement and termination of conciliation proceedings were determined by section 20 and not by section 12(6).\nThe dismissal of the workman was during the pendency of the conciliation proceedings and the appellants were guilty under section 31(1) of the Act.\nWorkers of the Industry Colliery, Dhanbad vs Management Of the Industry Colliery, ; ; Colliery Mazdoor Congress, Asansol vs New Beerbhoom Coal Co. Ltd., , applied.", + "5142": "The respondent passed an order of detention in respect of the appellant under section 3(2) of the , on the ground that the appellant 's activities were prejudicial to the maintenance of public order.\nSeveral criminal cases were pending against the appellant when the aforesaid order was passed.\nThe appellant had already surrendered in respect of a criminal charge against him before the order was served.\nHe filed a writ petition in the High Court challenging the detention order, but it was dismissed without any speaking order.\nAggrieved by the order of the High Court, the appellant filed the present criminal appeal by special leave as also a writ petition challenging the aforesaid order of detention on the ground that the order of preventive detention could only be justified against a person in detention if the detaining authority was satisfied that his release from detention was imminent and the order of detention was necessary for putting him back in jail.\nThe service of order of detention on the appellant/ petitioner while he was in jail was futile and useless since such an order had no application under section 3(2) of the Act.\nAllowing the writ petition and the appeal in part, ^ HELD: 1.\nThe continued detention of the detenu under the Act is not justified.\nThe order of detention therefore is set aside.\nHowever, this will not affect detenu 's detention under the criminal cases.\nIf however, the detenu is released on bail in the criminal cases already pending against him, the matter of service of the detention order under the Act may be reconsidered by the appropriate authority in accordance with law.\n[912 E F] 906 2.\nIn our constitutional framework, the power of directing preventive detention given to the appropriate authorities must be exercised in exceptional cases as contemplated by the various provisions of the different statutes dealing with preventive detention and should be used with great deal of circumspection.\nThere must be awareness of the facts necessitating preventive custody of a person for social defence.\nIf a man is in custody and there is no imminent possibility of his being released, the power of preventive detention should not be exercised.\n[911 F G] In the instant case, when the actual order of detention was served upon the detenu the detenu was in jail.\nThere is no indication that this factor or the question that the said detenu might be released or that there was such a possibility of his release was taken into consideration by the detaining authority properly and seriously before the service of the order.\nIf there were cogent materials for thinking that the detenu might be released, then these should have been made apparent.\nIn the affidavits on behalf of the detaining authority though there are indications that transfer of detenu from one prison to another was considered but the need to serve the detention order while he was in custody was not properly considered by the detaining authority in the light of relevant factors.\nIf that is the position then however disreputable the antecedents of a person might have been, without consideration of all the aforesaid relevant factors, the detenu could not have been put into preventive custody.\nTherefore, though the order of preventive detention when it was passed was not invalid, and on relevant considerations the service of the order was not on proper consideration.\nThe order of detention is, therefore set aside.\n[911 G H; 912 A D] Rameshwar Shaw vs District Magistrate, Burdwan & Anr., ; and Ramesh Yadav vs District Magistrate Etc.\nand others, , relied upon.", + "4938": "Section 28 of the Gold Control Act, 1968 bars money lending business to be carried on in licensed premises, either by the licensed dealer or by any other person unless authorised by the Administrator to do so.\nDrawing analogy from the reasoning adopted by the Supreme Court in its decision reported in Harakchand Ratanchand Banthia vs Assistant Collector or Central Excise, Poona, II Division, [1970] I SCR 479=AIR , the High Court of Andhra Pradesh struck down the said provision on the ground that it suffers from the vice of excessive delegation of legislative power in as much, as no criteria or guidelines have been provided by reference to which the power conferred on the Administrator to refuse permission or grant permission should be exercised and that the section confers an arbitrary, uncanalised and unfettered power upon the Administrator with the result that the licensed dealer is at his mercy while seeking permission to carry on money lending or banking business on the security of any article, ornament or both in the same premises in which he carried on business as such dealer.\nHence the appeal by special leave.\nAllowing the appeal, the Court ^ HELD: 1.1 Section 28 of the Gold Control Act, 1968 cannot be struck down on the ground of excessive delegation of legislative power and its validity must be upheld.\n[957C] 1.3 It is true that no express rule prescribing the conditions or circumstances under which the permission can be granted or refused has been framed nor any particular guide line has been expressly indicated in section 28 by reference to which the power conferred upon him thereunder could be exercised by the Administrator, but that is not decisive of the matter.\n[954H; 955A] 952 1.3 Section 28 of the Gold Control Act, 1968 is part and parcel of the entire scheme of the Gold Control Act the objective, the policy and the scheme of the Act together with the necessity to ensure prevention of circumvention of the other provisions of the Act afford more than sufficient guidance to the Administrator in the matter of exercising the power or discretion conferred on him under section 28.\nThe several restrictions that have been put on the activities of the traders doing business in gold will have to be viewed, in the light of the purpose or which the Gold Control Act was passed viz., that even though import of gold into India had been banned considerable quantities of contraband gold were finding their way into the country through illegal channels affecting the national economy and hampering the country 's economic stability and progress, that the Customs Department was not in a position to effectively combat the smuggling over the long borders and coast line that therefore anti smuggling measures had to be supplemented by a detailed system of control over internal transactions.\nIn fact section 5 (1) of the Act requires that the Administrator should have regard to the policy and purposes of the Act in making his orders.\nMoreover against his order under that section a revision lies to Central Government which implies that be will have to make judicious use of his power or discretion and any improper exercise is liable to be corrected by a higher authority.\nTherefore, it cannot be! said that unfettered or uncanalised or arbitrary power has been conferred upon the Administrator under section 28.\n1955B; E G] 1.4 further section 28 does not impose any blanket or absolute prohibition upon a dealer from carrying on money lending, banking or any other business in the same promises in which he carries on business as a dealer but he is prevented only from carrying in business as money lender or banker on the security of any article, ornament or both unless authorised by the Administrator.\nEven the restriction in the case of a third person in carrying on business as a money lender, banker or any other business in the same premises is not absolute in as much as the Administrator can authorise the third person to carry of the business in the licensed premises of the dealer and while implementing such limited restrictions or granting relief against the same he will be guided by the policy and purposes of the Act and by the prime consideration that circumvention of the other provisions of the Act shall not be permitted.\n[956A C] Bihar State Bullion Merchants Association.\nUnion of India, AIR 1971 Patna 240; Ramanlal Purshottamdas Chokshi vs Union of India & Others , approved.\n, Annam Ramalingam, etc.\nvs Union of India, Writ Petitions Nos.\n3956 3873/68 etc.\ndated 26.12.69.\nAndhra Pradesh, reversed.\n1.5 In Harakchand Banthia 's case the Supreme Court found, the phrases like 'in the region ', the anticipated demand '. 'suitability ' and 'public interest ' as vague, uncertain and therefore declared the unamended section 21(6) of the Gold Control Act as invalid and the Parliament has carried out suitable amendments thereafter.\nNo such vague or indefinite expressions or concepts are to be found in section 28 by reference to which 953 the Administrator is required to exercise his power.\nIn the absence of A parity of situation or circumstances the doctrine of parity of reasoning cannot be invoked.\n[957A C] Harakchand Ratanchand Banthia vs Assistant Collector of Central Excise Poona 11 Division, [1970] I SCR 479 AIR , explained and held in applicable.", + "2065": "The lands in dispute had been granted in inam to a temple.\nBy about 1929 the then manager of the temple disposed of all those properties under various sale deeds, resigned his position and left the village.\nHe was therefore removed from the management of the temple and other persons had taken up the position as de facto managers from 1929.\nAs a result of successive alienations of the properties, the appellants became entitled to them.\nIn 1951, the respondents were appointed trustees of The temple and under the Madras Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1951, they applied, to the Magistrate, for possession of the properties and the Magistrate ordered delivery of possession.\nBefore the order could be executed the appellants filed the suit in 1954, for a declaration of their title to the properties and for an injunction restraining the respondents from interfering with their possession.\nThe trial Court and the lower appellate Court decreed the suit.\nIn second appeal, the High Court held that the suit was governed by article 134 B of the Limitation Act,, 1908, which was introduced into the Act on 1st January 1929; and that the appellants ' claim in regard to the properties covered by the sale deeds of 1917 and 1926.\nshould be rejected, because, the alienees had not acquired title by adverse possession by 1st January, 1929, and is the alienor was still alive, the plea of adverse possession could not be sustained under that article.\nIn appeal to this Court it was contended that article 134 B would not apply to the present case but that article 144 would apply, because, the transfers were effected by the alienor on the 'representations that the properties belonged to him as his separate property; and that even if the article applied, the decision of the High Court was erroneous, because the transferor had been removed from management more than 12 years before the suit was filed.\nHELD : Though article 134 B applied to the facts of the case, since the appellants had acquired title to the properties by prescription, the decree passed by the High Court, in so far as it was against the appellants, should be set aside.\nColumn 1 of the article provides for suits brought,, inter alia, by the Tanager of a Hindu religion; or charitable endowment to recover possession of immovable property comprised in the endowment, which has been transferred by a previous manager for valuable consideration.\nThe period Prescribed for such suits is 12 years, and the time from which the period begins to run is the death, resignation or removal of the transferor.\nThe findings recorded by the High Court in the present case show that all the ingredients prescribed by the first column of the Article namely 121 (i)that the property belonged to the endowment, (ii) that it was transferred by a previous manager; and (iii) that the transfer was for valuable Consideration, were satisfied.\nThe character of the representations made by the previous manager in regard to his relation with the property which is the subject matter of transfer, is irrelevant for the purpose of the Article.\nBut if a suit had been brought by the respondents on the date when they were appointed trustees, it would have been barred under the Article, because more than 12 years had elapsed since the date of the removal of the previous manager who had transferred the properties; and therefore, the trial Court and the lower appellate Court were right in decreeing the, appellants ' suit in its entirety.\n[129 C D, H; 132 H] Mahant Sudarsan Das vs Mahant Ram Kirpal Das & Ors.\nL. R. 77 I.A. 42, applied.", + "4641": "The appellant, purporting to Act on behalf of a partnership consisting of himself, Todar Mal and Krishan Kumar, applied for and obtained permission in his individual capacity to construct a cinema theatre on a plot of land which was taken on lease jointly by all the three of them after the application for the permission was made but before the same was granted.\nThey entered into a partnership along with 11 others for carrying on the business of constructing and running a cinema theatre and the deed of partnership contained a clause that the plot of land as well as the permission obtained for constructing the theatre shall be the property of the firm.\nOn completion of the construction the appellant applied for, in his own name, and obtained in his personal capacity, a licence to exhibit cinematograph films at the Theatre.\nThe partnership was re constituted on retirement of two partners and the new deed executed by the remaining partners also contained a clause that the firm shall have the right to operate the licence.\nAn application for inclusion of the names of Todar Mal and Krishan Kumar in the licence was rejected by an order of the Licensing Authority who held that the appellant was the sole licensee and the said order became final.\nAnother application for renewal of the licence in the name of the Theatre on the ground that the appellant had been expelled from the partnership was also rejected by an order of the Licensing Authority which was not challenged.\nThereafter when, in a suit instituted for a declaration that the licence was the property of the firm, the trial court issued an injunction restraining the appellant from interfering with the possession and running of the Theatre by some of the partners of the firm, the appellant wrote to the Licensing Authority disclaiming responsibility for any acts of commission or omission committed by others in the premises of the Theatre.\nThe Licensing Authority, acting on a report from the police that films were being exhibited in the Theatre by persons other than the licensee, ordered suspension of exhibition of films at the Theatre.\nA writ petition challenging the validity of this order filed in the name of the Theatre was dismissed by a Single Judge of the High Court.\nIn tho Letters Patent Appeal heard by a Division Bench consisting of the Acting Chief Justice another Judge of the High Court the Acting Chief Justice held that the impugned order was void but the other Judge agreed with the view of the Single Judge who had dismissed the petition earlier.\nIn view of 576 the divergence of opinion, the matter was referred to the only other Judge available in the High Court, but he having declined to hear the same for good reason, the Division Bench decided under sub r.\n(3) of r. 23 of the Jammu and Kashmir High Court Rules, 1975 that the view of the Senior Judge should pre vail and accordingly the Letters Patent Appeal was allowed in conformity with the view taken by the Acting Chief Justice.\nThis resulted in the anomalous situation that as against the view concurrently taken by two Judges of the High Court, the opinion of the Acting Chief Justice which was really the minority view was allowed to prevail.\nThe reasons given by the Acting Chief Justice for the view he took were: (i) that a licence under the provisions of the Jammu and Kashmir (Cinematograph) Act is granted for premises permanently equipped for cinematograph exhibition in the name of the owner/manager of the cinematographs used in the premises and hence, where the licensed premises including the cinematograph used therein belongs to a partnership and one of the partners obtains a licence in his separate name, the other partners automatically acquire an interest in the licence and that the privilege granted by the licensing authority \"must necessarily follow the title in such building and the cinematograph\" and that the provision contained in section 6F lends support to this conclusion; (ii) that the partnership firm had a legal right in the licence which entitled it to notice and hearing under the Act before the licence was suspended; (iii) that inasmuch as the said procedure was not followed by the Licensing Authority the impugned order was void and in violation of principles of natural justice and (iv) that except for the power of revocation of licence embodied in section 6F and an implied power to suspend a licence pending proceedings for revocation, the Licensing Authority had no power to suspend the licence of the Theatre under any other circumstances.\nAllowing the appeal, ^ HELD: The provisions of the Act and the Rules contemplate the grant of a licence to a person in respect of a `place ' where cinematographic apparatus have been installed.\nUnder the Rules and the terms and conditions of the licence, the grantee thereof is the person answerable to the Licensing Authority for breach of the obligations and conditions.\nA licence granted under the Act is not analogous to a licence in the realm of real property law.\nIt is, therefore, not possible to accept the view that the licence is a grant for the premises and constitutes an interest attached to the premises.\nThe provision contained in section 6F, far from supporting such a view, goes to show that the holder of a licence may be a person different from the owner or partner of a cinematograph.\nThe object of that section is to empower the Licensing Authority to revoke the licence in the event of commission of an offence under s: 6 or 6E not merely by the licensee but also by any person who may be in actual charge of the cinematograph.\n[588 H, 589 A B, G H, 590 A] 2.\n(a) In proceedings to which the Licensing Authority was a party, the High Court as well this Court had upheld the order of the Licensing Authority holding the appellant to be the sole licensee and rejecting the case Put forward 577 on behalf of the firm.\nThe firm and its partners are bound by the said decision.\nIt is, therefore, unnecessary to deal with the reasons stated by the Acting Chief Justice of the High Court in support or his concussion that the licence was granted to the appellant in his individual capacity as representing the partnership.\n[588 D F] (b) The appellant was the sole licence in respect of the Theatre.\nBy virtue of r. 88 (v) as well as cl. 11 of the licence issued, there was a clear prohibition against the licensee from transferring, assigning, sub letting or otherwise transferring the licence without the permission of the Licensing Authority and also against his allowing any other person to exhibit films at the licensed place without obtaining such permission.\nThe firm of partners had no right whatever to exhibit cinematograph films at the theatre without a licence.\nIt was the plain duty of the Licensing Authority to ensure that exhibition of films was not conducted in the Theatre by unautuorised persons and the impugned order is obviously one passed by him in the discharge of the said function.\nThe principles of natural justice are not attracted to such a situation.\nThe position would have been different if it was a case of even temporary suspension of the licence without notice to the licensee.\nA, 592 A, C F] (c) The Licensing Authority had the power to make tho impugned order suspending the exhibition of films in the Theatre by persons other than the licensee.\nThe power to control the exhibition of cinematography by grant of licence and the power to administer and enforce the provisions of the Act and the rules included the implied power to take all steps necessary to ensure the due observance of the terms of the statute.\nthe rules and the conditions of licence.\nThe view expressed in the impugned judgment of the High Court that the Licensing Authority had no power to make the impugned order was based on the fallacious assumption that what was done under the impugned order was to suspend the licence while, in fact, what was done was only to suspend the exhibition of films in the Theatre by persons other than the licensee.\n[593 D F, B] 3.\nAlthough there are very serious doubts about the correctness of the view taken by the Division Bench of the High Court regarding the applicability of r. 23 (3) of the Jammu and Kashmir High Court Rules, 1975 to the instant case, it is not necessary to consider that question in view of the conclusion arrived at on the merits on the case.\n[586 F G]", + "380": "By section\n,12, sub section 1, of the (XXXI of 1950) as amended by Act XLII of 1954, notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, the Custodian may cancel any allotment or terminate any lease or amend the terms of any lease or agreement under which any evacuee property is held or occupied by a person, whether such allotment, lease or agreement was granted or entered into before or after the commencement of this Act\".\nThe respondent who was the Custodian of evacuee property granted a lease to the appellants and subsequently issued a notice to them, among other things, calling upon them to show cause why the lease should not be cancelled for committing breaches of the conditions on which the properties had been leased to them.\nThe appellants contended that the respondent had no power to cancel the lease on the ground that under section 12(1) of the Act the power of the Custodian to cancel the lease could be exercised only so as to override a bar imposed by any law but not the contract under which the lease was held and relied on the language of the non obstante clause contained in the section.\nHeld, that the operative portion of the section which confers power on the Custodian to cancel a lease is unqualified and absolute and could not be abridged by reference to the non obstante clause which was only inserted ex abundanti cautela with a view to repel a possible contention that the section does not by implication repeal statutes conferring rights on lessees.\nObservations in Aswini Kumar Ghose vs Arabinda Bose ([1963] S.C.R. 1, 21, 24) and Dominion of India vs Shrinbai A. Irani ([1955] 1 S.C.R. 206, 213), on the scope of a non obstante clause, relied on.", + "7109": "Proceedings were commenced under Chapter III B of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act 1955 for determining the ceiling area for Raghubir Singh, the father of the appellant.\nIn a revision application in the first round of litigation.\nThe Board of Revenue directed that the ceiling area for Raghubir Singh may be determined according to the old law, i.e. Act of 1955, and not according to the Rajasthan Imposition of Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings Act, 1973.\nThereafter, by his order dt.\n5.5.76, the SDO held, inter alia, that tile father and the son, appellant, constituted two separate units and each of them was entitled to get 62 bighas and 8 biswas.\nAggrieved by the SDO 's order, Raghubir Singh filed an appeal before Revenue Appellate Authority, which was dismissed.\nHe then filed a revision application under S.230 of the Act of 1955 before the Board of Revenue for Rajasthan.\nHe urged that he was in possession of 112 bighas only and sought permission to adduce additional evidence, which was disallowed.\nHowever, the Member of the Board held inter alia that the provisions of the old law applied to the case, but the SDO had committed an error of law in determining the ceiling area under the new Act of 1973.\nThe Board further held that there is no provision for separate units in Chapter III B of the Act of 1955, and remanded the case to the SDO, Hanumangarh, for fresh determination of the Ceiling area for Raghubir Singh.\nBefore the High Court, it was urged that the State having not appealed against the order of the SDO dated 5.5.76, it became final, and the Board of 723 Revenue had no jurisdiction to set aside that part of the SDO 's order which had gone against the State and in his favour.\nIt was submitted that the power of general superintendence and control over all revenue courts which vested in the Board could not be exercised to the detriment of the writ petitioners much less by way of suo motu exercise of powers.\nThe High Court dismissed the petitions.\nBefore this court it was submitted that the State not having filed an appeal, or a revision, the Board of Revenue could not, while hearing the revision petition of Raghubir Singh, set aside the orders of the SDO and Revenue Appellate Authority under S.221 of the Act of 1955.\nDismissing the appeal, this court, HELD:. .(1) S.221 is not subject to the other provisions of the Act.\nIt is clear from the language of Section 221 of the Act 1955 that the Board of Revenue has general powers of superintendence and control over all revenue courts.\nIt is both administrative as well as judicial powers.\nIt is open to the Board to exercise its powers of superintendence on all its subordinate courts in order to regulate the functioning of the subordinate courts so as to keep them within their respective spheres of jurisdiction.\nIf the subordinate court disregards any specific provision of law and does something illegal it is open to the Board of Revenue to interfere and set the matter right.\n(727 E) Karan Singh vs Board of revenue, Rajasthan and Permessar Singh vs Kailaspati AIR 1916 Pat. 292 (FB), distinguished.\nKana vs Board of Revenue ILR , approved.\n(2) There is no restriction on the powers of the Board to set aside the order of the SDO provided it comes to the conclusion that interest of justice requires exercise of such powers.\n(728 D) (3) In not determining the ceiling area according to the Act of 1955, the SDO committed a grave illegality in not merely ignoring the law but also ignoring the directions of the Board of Revenue itself.\n(728 F) 724", + "5707": "HELD: The Court was concerned with the narrow question whether the six law reports aforementioned being published by the 1st respondent were newspapers within the meaning of the Act and whether the employees engaged in their production or distribution were entitled to the benefit of the orders made by the Central Government on the basis of the Palekar Award.\n[781F] In order to be a newspaper, a work must be (i) a printed work, (ii) a periodical, and (iii) should contain public news or comments on public news.\nAny other class of printed periodical work as may, from time to time, be notified in this behalf by the Central Government in the official Gazette, may also be a newspaper.\nThere was no dispute in this case that the law reports are printed works and that they are periodicals.\nThe only question which remained to be considered was whether they contained public news or comments on public news, Newspapers and 776 books are no doubt shown as separate items in Entry 39 of List III of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution, but the distinction between them sometimes becomes very thin or totally vanishes.\n[781G H;782A B] The law reports being published by the 1st respondent are reports of recent decisions of the Supreme Court of India and the High Courts in India, which are supplied to it by its agents appointed at New Delhi and other places where the High Courts are situated.\nThese decisions are of public importance.\nThe law declared by the Supreme Court is binding on all the Courts in India, as provided by Article 141 of the Constitution.\nThe decisions of the Supreme Court a court of record constitute a source of law as they are judicial precedents of the highest court of the land.\nThey are binding on all the courts throughout India.\nThe decisions of every High Court being judicial precedents are binding on all the Courts situated in the territory under the jurisdiction of the High Court.\nThe decisions of the Supreme Court and High Courts are almost as important as statutes, rules and regulations passed by the competent legislatures and other bodies.\nThe decisions of the superior courts, while they settle the disputes between the parties to the proceedings, are sources of law in so far as all others are concerned.\nAs soon as a decision is rendered, the members of the public would be interested in knowing it; lawyers and others connected with the courts and judicial proceedings are interested in knowing the contents and effects of the decisions.\nThe 1st respondent and other publishers of law reports, in the interests of their own business, vie with each other to publish the judgments of the Supreme Court or the High Courts as early as possible in their law reports, published periodically weekly, fortnightly or monthly.\nThey believe the faster the decisions are published in their reports, the larger will be the number of subscribers.\nThe contents of these law reports constitute news in so far as the subscribers and readers of these reports are concerned.\nBy reading these law reports, they come to know of the latest legal position prevailing in the country on any question decided in the decisions reported in the said reports.\nHence, it was difficult to agree with the submission of the 1st respondent that the law reports did not carry any news and that the public was not interested in them.\nAny decision published in the law reports of the 1st respondent contains information about the recent events which have taken place in the Supreme Court or the High Courts which are public bodies and these are matters in which public is interested.\nThe Court found it also difficult to agree with the submission of the 1st respondent that since the law reports are going to be preserved by the lawyers as reference books after getting them rebound subsequently, they should be treated as books.\nThe decisions contained in these law reports may 777 cease to be items of news after some time, but when they are received by the subscribers, they do possess the character of works containing news.\n[782G H; 783A H] Strong reliance was placed by the 1st respondent on the decision of the High Court of Orissa in P.S.V. Iyer vs Commissioner of Sales Tax, Orissa, AIR 1960 Orissa 221, but the Court found it difficult to agree with that decision since the High Court had omitted to take into consideration that information about recent decisions of the Courts of record could be news in which the public was interested.\nThe fact that a law book could be used as a reference book at a later stage was not sufficient to hold that the law report did not contain public news when it was received by the subscriber.\n[784A, G H] It is sufficient that the expression 'newspaper ' as defined in the Act includes not merely 'public news ' but also 'comments on public news '.\nEvery law report contains the editorial note and also comments on some of the recent decisions.\nThe law Reports also contain newly enacted Acts, Rules and Regulations, book reviews and advertisements relating to law books, handwriting and finger print experts, etc., speeches made at conferences in which the legal fraternity is interested, etc.\nThough the publication of these items by itself may not occupy a substantial part of a law report to make it a newspaper, the publication of the recent judgments itself is sufficient to make a law report a newspaper which may after some time cease to be a newspaper and become a book of reference.\n[786G H; 787A B] The Act is a beneficient legislation which is enacted for improving the conditions of service of the employees of the newspaper establishments, and even if it is possible to have two opinions on the construction of the provisions of the Act, the one which advances the object of the Act and is in favour of the employees for whose benefit the Act is passed has to be accepted.\n[787B C] The Law Reports published by the 1st respondent are newspapers and the employees employed by the 1st respondent in their production or publication should be extended the benefit of the orders passed by the Central Government on the basis of the recommendations made by the Palekar Award.[787C D] The judgment of the High Court was set aside and the writ petition filed by the 1st respondent before the High Court was dismissed.\n[787D] 778 P.S.V. Iyer vs Commissioner of Sales Tax, Orissa, AIR 1960 Orissa 221; T.V. Ramanath & Anr.\nvs Union of India & Ors.\n, [1975] Labour and Industrial Cases 488; L.D. Jain vs General Manager, Government of India Press and Others, ILR 1967 Punjab and Haryana 193; Ex Parte Stillwell, and Commissioner of Sales Tax vs M/s. Express Printing Press, AIR 1983 Bombay 191, referred to.", + "5538": "% The appellant, who was stated to be a monthly tenant of the suit premises, entered into an agreement, which was described as an agreement of 'leave and licence ', with the respondent on 9th February, 1965 and the respondent and the appellant were described therein as licensor and licensee respectively.\nIt was stated in the agreement that the licensor was seized of the premises in dispute as a monthly tenant and gave and granted 'leave and license ' to the licensee to use and occupy the said premises for a period of five years, merely for the purpose of workshop business, at a monthly compensation of Rs.225 that the licensor shall be entitled to terminate the agreement and cancel and revoke and withdraw the leave and licence granted earlier and to take possession forthwith of the said premises if the licensee committed any default of any terms and conditions or failed to pay the compensation for two months or if the licensee at any time put up false or adverse claim of tenancy or sub tenancy, that the licensee shall pay the electric charges in respect of consumption of electricity and the rent of the said premises should be paid by the licensor only, and that the licensor shall have the full right to enter upon the premises and inspect the same at any time.\n1058 In November 1970, the respondent filed an ejectment proceedings against the appellant under section 41 of the .\nIt was contended by the appellant that there was sub tenancy by the respondent in his favour as monthly tenant.\nThe trial court passed a decree and ordered the appellant to vacate the premises holding that the agreement was for leave and licence and that the appellant was a licensee and not a subtenant.\nOn the case being remanded by the Supreme Court in a Special Leave Petition filed by the respondent against the earlier decision of the High Court, allowing the appellant 's special civil application, the High Court upheld the order of the Court of Small Causes, and ordered eviction of the appellant.\nIn the Special Leave Petition against the aforesaid decision, it was contended that the document in question read as a whole was a lease and not a license.\nDismissing the appeal by special leave, ^ HELD: 1.1 If an interest in immovable property entitling the transferee to enjoyment was created, it was lease; if permission to use land without exclusive possession was alone granted, a licence was the legal result.\n[1067D E] 1.2 In determining whether an agreement creates between the parties the relationship of landlord and tenant or merely that of licensor and licensee, decisive consideration is the intention of the parties.\n[1068B C] In view of the intention of the parties in the document and the facts and circumstances of the instant case, it was a licence and not a lease.\nThis is clear from the language used and the restrictions put upon the use of the premises in question by the appellant.\nIn the document in question the expression \"licence\" was introduced and clause (2) said that it was only for the business purposes.\nThe licence fee was fixed.\nIt permitted user only for 20 hours.\nRestriction in the hours of work negates the case for lease.\nClause (12) gives to the licensor right to enter upon the premises and inspect the same at any time.\n[1067E F] 1059 1.3 Where two views are possible and the trial court has taken one view which is a possible and plausible view merely because another view is attractive, the High Court should not interfere and would be in error in interfering with the finding of the trial court or interfering under Article 227 of the Constitution over such decision.\n[1068E F] H. Maniar and others vs Woman Laxman Kudav, ; ; Miss Mani J. Desai vs M/s. Gayson & Co. Pvt.\nLtd. 73 Bombay Law Reporter 394; Associated Hotels of India Ltd. vs R.N. Kapoor, ; ; Mrs. M.N. Clubwala and another vs Fida Hussain Saheb and others; , at page 653; Sohanlal Naraindas vs Laxmidas Raghunath Gadit, 68 Bombay Law Reporter 400; Sohan Lal Naraindas vs Laximdas Raghunath Gadit, ; Qudrat Ullah vs Municipal Board, Bareilly, [1974] 2 S.C.R. 530; Booker vs Palmer, at 676, 677; Venkatlal G. Pittie & Anr.\nvs M/s. Bright Bros. (Pvt) Ltd., [1987] 2 scale 115; M/s. Beopar Sahayak (P) Ltd. & others vs Shri Vishwa Nath & 5 others, [1987]2 scale 27; Satyanaryan Laxminarayan Hegde and others vs Mallikarjun Bhavanappa Tirumale, A.I.R. 1960 S.C. 137 and Halsbury 's Laws of England.\n, Fourth Edition, Volume 27 page 13, referred to.", + "1762": "In 1947, the Dholpur State acceded to the Dominion of India.\nLater on, it was merged with other States and as a result of that merger, the Matsya Union was formed on March 18, 1948.\nOne of the provisions of the merger agreement was that the existing laws in the Covenanting States were to be continued till such time as they were modified or repealed by the new State and that all the assets and liabilities of the Covenanting States were taken over by the new State.\nLater on, the Matsya Union was merged with the United State of Rajasthan which had come into existence from April 7, 1949.\nA similar provision with regard to the recognition of the liabilities of the Covenanting States by the new State was also provided.\nOn January 26, 1950, Part B State of Rajasthan came into existence.\nIn the four appeals the respondents secured permits from the Dholpur State for the export of certain commodities and they had to pay export duties in advance.\nAs the respondents could not export the full quantity for which they had secured permits they asked the appellant to refund the excess export duty and when the latter refused to do so, filed suits for refund of the same with interest.\nThe defence taken up by the appellant was that it was not bound by any liability which might have arisen against the former State of Dholpur.\nIt was a new Sovereign and was not bound by any liability of the former State of Dholpur unless it chose to recognise the obligation but no such obligation was recognised in the present case.\nOne suit was dismissed by the trial court and other three were decreed.\nThe appeals of the State to the District Judge were substantially dismissed while the appeal in the first suit by the plaintiff was substantially allowed.\nThe State filed appeals to the High Court.\nAfter referring the matter to the Full Bench, a Division Ben oh of the High Court dismissed the appeals filed by the State.\nThe Appellant came to this Court after obtaining certificate of fitness from the High Court.\nThe only question raised before this Court was about the liability of the State of Rajasthan under article 295(2) of the Constitution in respect of the obligations of the former State of Dholpur which came to be included in the State of Rajasthan.\nDismissing the appeals, Held, that the new State by continuing the old laws without change till they were repealed or altered, recognised that it was liable in the same way as the merging State would have been in any case.\nThroughout the process of integration from 1948 to 1950, the new Sovereign must be taken to have recognised the rights of the subjects and undertaken the liabilities 175 of the old State.\nSo under article 295(2) of the Constitution, the State of Rajasthan was liable to meet the liabilities of all old States which eventually were merged into it.\nMoreover, there was nothing to show that the right to claim the refund was taken away by any law competently passed.\nM/s Dalmia Dadri Cement Co. Limited vs The Commissioner of Income tax [1959], S.C.R. 729 and Maharaja Shree Umaid Mill Limited vs Union of India, A.I.R. 1953, S.C. 953 referred to.", + "652": "The Madras legislature enacted the Madras Commercial Crops Markets Act for providing satisfactory conditions for the growers of commercial crops to sell their produce on equal terms with the purchasers and at reasonable prices.\nThe Act, Rules and the Bye laws framed thereunder have a long term target of providing a net work of markets wherein facilities for correct weighment are ensured, storage accommodation is provided, and reliable market information is given.\nTill such markets are established the Act provides for the imposition of licensing restrictions to enable the buyers and sellers to meet in licensed premises.\nAfter the establishment of the markets no licenses would be issued within a reasonable radius from the markets and all growers will have to resort to the markets for selling their crops.\nThe result would be to eliminate, as far as possible, the middlemen and to give reasonable facilities for the growers of commercial crops to secure best prices for their commodities.\nHeld, that the impugned provisions of the Act impose reasonable restrictions on the citizen 's right to do business and are valid.\nSuch a statute cannot be said to create unreasonable restrictions on the citizen 's right to do business unless it is clearly established that the provisions are too drastic, unnecessarily harsh and over reach the object for which they were made.\nChintaman Rao vs The State of Madhya Pradesh, [1950] S.C.R. 759 and State of Madras vs V. G. Rao, ; , referred to.", + "496": "It is well settled that common intention in section 34 of tile Indian Penal Code presupposes prior concert.\nIt requires a prearranged plan because before a man can be vicariously convicted for the criminal act of another, the act must have boon done in furtherance of the common intention of them all.\nAccordingly there must have been a prior meeting of minds.\nSeveral persons can simultaneously attack a man and each can have the same intention, namely the intention to kill, and each can individually inflict a separate fatal blow and yet none would have the common intention required by the section because there was no prior meeting of minds to form a pre arranged plan.\nIn a case like that, each would be individually liable for whatever injury he caused but none could be vicariously convicted for the act of any of the others; and if the prosecution cannot prove that his separate blow was a fatal one he cannot be convicted of the murder however clearly an intention to kill could be proved in his case.\nCare must be taken not to confuse same or similar intention with common intention; the partition which divides their bounds is often very thin, nevertheless the distinction is real and substantial, and if overlooked will result in miscarriage of justice.\nThe plan need not be elaborate, nor is a long interval of time required.\nIt could arise and be formed suddenly, But there must 139 1084 be pre arrangement and premeditated concert.\nIt is not enough, to have the same intention independently of each other.\nThe inference of common intention should never be reached unless it is a necessary inference deducible from the circumstances of the case.\nIt is a question of fact in every case and however similar the circumstances, facts in one case cannot be used as a precedent to determine the conclusion on the facts in another.\nAll that is necessary is either to have direct proof of prior concert, or proof of circumstances which necessarily lead to that inference, or, in other words, the incriminating facts must be incompatible with the innocence of the accused and incapable of ex planation on any other reasonable hypothesis.\nWhen appellate judges, who agree on the question of guilt differ on that of sentence, it is usual not to impose the death penalty unless there are compelling reasons.\nBarendra Kumar Ghosh vs King Emperor ([1924] L.R. 52 I.A. 40), Mahbub Shalt vs King Emperor ([1945] L.P. 72 I.A. 148) and Mamand vs Emperor (A.I.R. , referred to.", + "5397": "Fundamental Rule 56(j) confers power on the appropriate authority to compulsorily retire a Government servant, if it is in the public interest to do so, by giving 3 months ' notice or 3 months ' pay and allowances in lieu of such notice; while sub cl.\n(i) thereof states that a public servant in class I or class II service or post who had entered service before attaining the age of 35 years can be retired after he has attained the age of 50 years, sub cl.\n(ii) thereof states that any other public servant can be retired after he has attained the age of 55 years.\nIn Union of India vs K.R. Tahiliani & Anr., this Court had held that F.R. 56(j) is meant to cover only those who are in a post on a regular basis, i.e., in a substantive capacity, and not on an officiating basis only.\nBasing his case on this decision, the petitioner, who had been compulsorily retired while working in a class II post In an officiating capacity, challenged the order of his compulsory retirement.\nOverruling the decision in Union of India vs K.R. Tahi liani & Anr., but, allowing the petition on the ground that the Delhi High Court, relying upon that decision, had grant ed relief to persons similarly placed as the petitioner, and, directing payment of his salary and allowances upto the date of his normal superannuation, HELD: Sub clause (1) of r. 56(j) of the Fundamental Rules applies to Government servants in Class I or Class II service or post on substantive, temporary or officiating basis.\n[638E F] There is no reference to officiating service in sub cl.\nThe relevant words used in sub cl.\n(i) are \"if he is in CIasa I or CIasa II service or post.\n\" A person can be in Class I or CIasa II service or post even when he holds a post of either ciasa substantively or temporarily or on officiating basis.\nInstances are abundant where officers are promoted to CIasa I or Class II service or post of such class on officiating basis and 633 such officiation lasts for a number of years.\nOfficiating promotion certainly does not confer a right to the post and at any time the Government servant may be sent back to his substantive post.\nThere is, however, no reason why sub cl.\n(i) should be confined to service or post held on substan tive basis.\nIt is not disputed that a person who is in Class I or Class II service or post is in such service or post as covered by sub cl.\nThe possibility of such incumbent being sent back to the substantive post is not at all rele vant in the matter of exercising powers of compulsory re tirement.\nIf the officiation is not brought to an end by reverting the Government servant to his substantive post before the power of compulsory retirement is exercised, the Government servant concerned must be taken to be in Class I or Class II service or post at the relevant time and would come within the ambit of sub cl.\nThere is no warrant for the conclusion that officiating Government servants in Class I or Class II service or post are outside the purview of sub cl.\nThe possibility of a reversion to the sub stantive post is not germane to the exercise of power con tained in F.R. 56.\n[637F H; 638A C] The purpose of F.R. 56(j) is to confer power on the appropriate authority to compulsorily retire a Government servant in the public interest and the classification of Government servants into two categories covered by sub cls.\n(i) and (ii) has a purpose behind it.\nIf the condition indicated in sub cl.\n(i) is satisfied, namely, the Govern ment servant is in Class I or Class II service or post and he had entered into service before attaining the age of 35 years, and has attained the age of fifty, the further condi tion that he must substantively belong to the two classes of service or post cannot be introduced into the scheme.\nThe purpose of the sub clauses is to classify Government serv ants into two categories and sub cl.\n(i) takes within its sweep those Government servants who at the relevant time are in Class I or Class II service or post, whether substantive ly, temporarily or on officiating basis.\n[638C E] Union of India vs K.R. Tahiliani & Ant., , over rulled.", + "4782": "One Late Raja Vasireddi Chandra Dhara Prasad died intestate on 12th January, 1961.\nHe had filled a proposal for insurance for Rs. 50,000 on 27th December 1960.\nThere was medical examination by the doctor on the life of the deceased on 27th, December, 1960.\nThe deceased issued two cheques being the consideration towards the first premium for Rs 300 and Rs. 220 respectively which were encashed by the appellant on 29th December 1960 and 11th January 1961.\nOn 16th January 1961, the widow of the deceased wrote to the appellant intimating the death of the deceased and demanded payment of Rs. 50,000 The Divisional Manager, Masulipatam Branch denied liability on behalf of the appellant on 28th January, 1961.\nThereafter there was correspondence between the parties between Ist February 1961 and 23rd December 1963.\nOn 10th January 1964, the respondents filed a suit in the Court of Subordinate Judge, Masulipatam.\nThe trial court dismissed the suit holding, inter alia, that there was no concluded contract, that the proposal was not accepted by the Divisional Manager for some reason or the other by the time the deceased had died, that neither the encashment of the two cheques created a contract of insurance.\nIn appeal, the High Court after ordering certain other additional documents set aside the Trial Court Judgment.\nHence the appeal by the Corporation after obtaining the special leave.\nAllowing the appeal, the Court ^ HELD; 1.\nHaving regard to the clear position in law about acceptance of insurance proposal and the evidence of record in this case, it is clear that the, High Court was in error.\nin coming to the conclusion that there was a concluded contract of insurance between the deceased and the Life Insurance Corporation.\n[360D E] 2.\nThough in certain human relationship silence to a proposal might 351 convey acceptance but in the case of insurance proposal, silence does not denote consent and no binding contract arises until the person to whom an offer is made says or does something to signify his acceptance.\nMere delay in giving an answer cannot be construed as an acceptance, as, prima facie, acceptance must be communicated to the offer or The general rule is that the contract of insurance will be concluded only when the party to whom an offer has been made accepts it unconditionally and communicates his acceptance to the person making the offer.\nWhether the final acceptance is that of the assured or insurers, however, depend simply on the way in which negotiations for an insurance have progressed.\n[359H, 360A B] 3: 1.\nWhen an insurance policy becomes effective is well settled by the authorities but it is clear that the expression \"underwrite\" signifies accept liability under that.\nThe dictionary meaning also indicates that.\nIt is true that normally the expression \"underwrite\" is used in Marine insurance but the expression used in Chapter III of the Financial Powers of the Standing order in this case specifically used the expression 'funderwriting and revivals\" of policies in case of Life Insurance Corporation and stated that it was the Divisional Manager who was competent to underwrite policy for Rs, 50,000 and above.\n[359 B D] 3: 2.\nThe mere receipt and retention of premium until after the death of the applicant or the mere preparation of the policy document is not acceptance.\nAcceptance must be signified by some acts or acts agreed on by the parties or from which the law raised a presumption of acceptance.\n[359D E] 3: 3 In the instant case, the High Court was in error in coming to the following conclusions; (i) that there was not sufficient pleading that there was no concluded contract, and non acceptance of the proposal was not sufficient averment that the Divisional Manager was the only competent authority to accept the proposal; (ii) in its view about the powers of the different authorities under Chapter III of the Standing order 1960, dealing with the financial powers; (iii) about the view that the Assistant Divisional Manager having accepted the proposal and (iv) about the assurance given by the Field officers that the acceptance of the first premium would automatically create a concluded contract of insurance ' [358E H] The Court however directed half the amount of the insurance amount of Rs. 85,000 paid to the Respondents to be refunded to the Corporation.\n[360F G]", + "2657": "M/s Tarapore & Co. who were plaintiffs in a suit applied for an interim injunction restraining the first defendant in the suit from taking any steps in pursuance of a letter of credit opened in favour of the second defendant.\nA single judge of the High Court granted an interim injunction restraining encashment of the letters of credit pending disposal of the suit.\nIn appeals under the Letters Patent preferred by the second dependent, the High Court of Madras set aside that order.\nAgainst the orders passed in the two appeals, the plaintiffs applied for certificate under articles 133(1) (a) and 133(1)(b) of the Constitution.\nThe High Court observed that an order granting interim injunction \"is a final order, as far as this Court is concerned, determining the rights of parties within this his or proceeding, which is independent though ancillary to the suit\", and they were competent to grant certificate.\nIn this Court the defendants applied for revocation of the certificate.\nHELD: The certificate must be revoked.\nAn order passed by the, High Court in appeal which does not finally dispose of a suit or proceeding and leaves the rights and obligations of the parties for determination in the suit or proceeding from which the appeal has arisen, is not final within the meaning of article 133(1)(a) and (h).\nThe order refusing to grant an interim injunction did not determine the rights and obligations of the parties in relation to the matter in dispute in the suit.\nIt could not be held that because the plaintiffs suit as a result of the order of the High Court may become infructuous as framed and the plaintiff may have to amend his plaint to obtain effective relief an order which is essentially an interlocutory order may be deemed final for the purpose of article 133(1) of the Constitution.\n[704 H] Mohanlal Maganlal Thakkar 's case makes no departure from the earlier judgments of the judicial Committee, the Federal Court and this Court.\nRamchand Manjimal vs Goverdhandas Vishindas Ratanchand, L.R. 47 I.A. 124; Salaman vs Warner, ; Bazson vs Altrincham Urban District Council, [1903] 1 K.B. 547; Isaacs vs Selbstein, , Abdul Rahrnan vs\nD.K. Cassim & Sons, L.R. 60 I.A. 76; section Kuppusami Rao vs The King, ; Mohammad Amin Brothers Ltd, and Others vs Dominion of India and Others, ; Sardar Syedna Taher Saifuddin Saheb vs The State of Bombay, ; Srinivasa Prasad Singh vs Kesho Prasad Singh 13 C.L.J. 681 and Druva Coal Company vs Benaras Bank, , referred to.\nMohanlal Maganlal Thakkar vs State of Gujarat.\nA.I.R. , explained.", + "5937": "On a civil miscellaneous petition for clarification of this Court 's judgment dated 4th November, 1988, the Court.\nHELD: The assessable value of the processed fabric would be the value of the grey cloth in the hands of the processor plus the value of the job work done plus manufacturing profit and manufacturing expenses whatever these may be, which will either be included in the price at the factory gate or deemed to be the price at the factory gate for the processed fabric.\n[345D E] The factory gate means the \"deemed\" factory gate as if the processed fabric was sold by the processor.\n[345E] If the trader.\nwho entrusts cotton or man made fabric to the processor for processing on job work basis, would give a declaration to the processor as to what would be the price at which he would be selling the processed goods in the market, that would be taken by the Excise authorities as the assessable value of the processed fabric and excise duty would be charged to the processor on that basis.\nSuch a declaration would include only the price or deemed price at which the processed fabric would leave the processor 's factory plus his profit.\nIt is necessary to include the processor 's expenses, costs and charges plus profit, but not the trader 's profits who gets the fabrics processed, because those would be post manufacturing profits.\n[345G H; 346B C]", + "4807": "Section 33 of the Punjab Panchayat Samitis and Zilla Parishads Act, 1961 provided that subject to rules made by the Government, a Panchayat Samiti may employ such servants as it may consider necessary for the efficient performance of the duties imposed upon it by the Act, rules or bye laws made thereunder or by any other law for the time being in force.\nThe Punjab Panchayat Samitis and Zilla Parishads (Haryana Amendment Act, 1973 which came into force from June, 13, 1973, introduced extensive amendments.\nSection 33 of the Act was deleted by Section 13 of the Amending Act, Sub section (4) of Section 14 the Amending Act, provided that persons employed by a Panchayat Samiti before April 4, 1973 and who were in service at the commencement of the Amending Act, \"shall continue to serve on the same terms and conditions on which they were employed by the Panchayat Samiti\" until they are absorbed in the Government Service or retire in such manner as may be prescribed.\nSection 35(1) of the Act empowers the State Government to place at the disposal of a Panchayat Samiti such of its servants as are required for the implementation of the schemes annexed therewith, and for such other duties and functions as may be assigned to them by the Panchayat Samitis from time to time.\nThe appellant was appointed as a clerk on June 1, 1963 by the Panchayat Samiti, Loharu.\nHe was confirmed in that post ill course of time.\nOn January 21, 1974, he was promoted as a Head Clerk on an ad hoc basis.\nOn March, 14 1975 a resolution was passed by the Samiti regularising the post of Head Clerk.\nOn April 1, 1975, the appellant was appointed as a Head Clerk.\nActing in pursuance of the provision of Section 14(1) of the.\nthe Amending Act, The Government of Haryana notified the absorption of the appellant as a clerk, though he was working as a Head Clerk since January 21, 1974.\nBeing aggrieved the appellant filed a Writ Petition and prayed for a direction to absorb him as a Head Clerk.\nThe Writ Petition having been dismissed by the High Court, the appellant has filed this appeal by special leave.\nDismissing the appeal, the Court, ^ HELD: 1.1.\nThe Panchayat Samiti had no right to appoint the appellant to the post of Head Clerk on the date on which it purported to do so.\nAs a result of the deletion of Section 33 of the Act by the Amending Act of 1973, the 735 Panchayat Samiti lost its power to make appointment to the Panchayat.\nIt could not therefore have appointed the appellant as a Head Clerk, as it purported to do so, in January, 1974 on an adhoc basis or in April 1965 on a regular basis.\n[737D] 1.2.\nThough the right to be considered for promotion is a term and condition of service, in the instant case, the appointment of the appellant to the post of a Head Clerk being without the authority of law, the Government was not bound to absorb him in the post of a Head Clerk.\nHe was appointed lawfully to the post of a clerk and that is the post in which the Government has absorbed him.\n[737C; E]", + "4451": "The plaintiffs in their suit claimed that the properties in dispute belonged to the Math Sauna temple and that one of the plaintiffs Mahant Sadashiva Yati on the death of his predecessor was elected as Mahant of the temple and that therefore as Sarbarakar he was entitled to all the properties recorded in the name of the deity or his predecessor.\nThe defendant claimed that by virtue of a will executed by Mahant Shivshankar Yati, the predecessor Mahant, the properties in dispute which were his personal properties devolved on him.\nThe Civil Judge decreed the plaintiffs ' suit with a finding that Mahant Sadashiv Yati was not the Sarbarakar.\nUpholding the respondent 's claim, the High Court in appeal, held that the properties did not belong either to the Math or the deity but were the personal and separate properties of Mahant Shivshankar Yati.\nIn appeal to this Court the appellants impugned the correctness of the High Court 's view.\nDismissing the appeal, ^ HELD: The properties in dispute did not form part of the properties of Math Sauna or of the deity but were the personal properties of the respondent.\n[664 D E] It is well accepted that certain sects of Sanyasis (such as Dashnami Sanyasis in this case) could acquire personal property of their own and that the pronamis given to a Mahant are generally his personal property.\nThe mere fact that a Mahant is an ascetic does not raise any presumption that the property in his possession is not his personal property.\nThere is no presumption either way.\nIn each case the burden is upon the plaintiff to establish that the properties in respect of which he is asking for possession are properties to which he is entitled.\n[662 F G] 660 In the instant case the three earlier Mahants before they took to sanyasa had been grahasthas.\nThey were entitled to possess, enjoy and acquire personal property.\nMahant Shivpher Yati, one of the predecessor Mahants, whose reputation as a man of learning and personal attainments was high, received personal bhents from many of his affluent chelas.\nIn addition, on the death of his predecessor Mahant Shivbaran Yati.\nMahant Shivpher Yati inherited his personal property, all of which devolved on Shivshankar Yati.\nA succession certificate in respect of these properties was granted in the name of Shivshankar Yati.\nThe revenue records also showed him as the owner of the properties and not the Math or the deity.\nNone of the transfers of small parcels of these properties made by Mahant Shivshankar Yati from time to time was challenged by the plaintiffs at any time.\n[663 A l] Whether a property was acquired by the application of the nucleus could only be determined after taking into consideration all the facts and circumstances of a case and on a balancing of the entire evidence.\nThe burden of proof rests on the party making the claim.\n[663 F G] In the present case there is no material on record to how whether the total income from the properties belonging to the Math and the deity, left any appreciable surplus after meeting the expenditure on bhog and other ceremonies.\nThe High Court rightly held that the fund from which the properties were acquired constituted the personal property of Mahant Shivpher Yati on whose death Shivshankar Yati employed it for the purchase of the properties and by virtue of his will the properties devolved on the respondent.\n[663 H]", + "1181": "The appellants who are displaced persons from West Pakistan, were granted quasi permanent allotment of some lands in village Raikot in 1949.\nOn October 31, 1952, the Assistant Custodian cancelled the allotment of 14 allottees in village Karodian, and also cancelled the allotment of the Appellants in Raikot but allotted lands to them in village Karodian, and allotted the lands of Raikot to other persons.\nThe 14 allottees of village Karodian as well as the appellants applied for review of the orders of cancellation of their allotment.\nThe application of the 14 allottees was dismissed.\nThey preferred a revision to the Custodian General who cancelled the appellant 's allotment (1) Cal.\n926. 329 in Karodian and restored the allotment of the 14 allottees on December 17, 1954 Thereupon,, on January 6, 1955, the appellants moved the Custodian General for calling up their review application and for revising the order of October 31, 1952, cancelling their allotment in Raikot.\nThe Custodian General refused to revise the order on the ground that his power to revise had been taken away by the .\nThe appellants contended that the, Custodian General had the power to revise the order.\nHeld, that after the enactment of the, , the Custodian General ceased to have the power to cancel allotments.\nBy, the issuing of a notification under, section 12(1) of this Act, the Fight, title or interest of the evacuee in the property specified in the notification was extinguished and the property vested absolutely in the Central.\nGovernment.\nThe right of the Custodian manage the property under the , came to an end and the management vested in a new set of officers.\nEven though no managing officer was appointed or a managing corporation, constituted under the new Act to manage the property no one else could 'exercise the power of cancellation of allotment.\nBal Mukund vs The State of Punjab, I.L.R. 1957 Punj.\n712, approved.", + "6245": "The Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission conducted recruitment examination to the post of Upper Zila Basic Shiksha Adhikari (Women) in two stages written test and interview.\nThe Commission cancelled the entire recruitment examination for re holding it, after it was found that due to improper feeding into the computer candidates who secured lesser marks in the written examination were interviewed and finally selected while candidates who had better performance were not called for interview.\nWrit petitions challenging the action of the Commission were dismissed by the High Court.\nHence these appeals.\nAllowing the appeals and setting aside the judgment of the High Court, this Court, HELD: When no defect was pointed out in regard to the written examination and the sole objection was confined to exclusion of a group of successful candidates in the written examination from the interview, there was no justification for cancelling the written part of the recruitment examina tion.\n[125G] The situation on the other hand could have been appro priately met by setting aside the recruitment and asking for a fresh interview of all eligible candidates on the basis of the written examination and selection of those who on the basis of the written and the freshly held interview became eligible for selection.\n[125H; 126A]", + "3292": "The appellant filed the suit on the basis that as the Mahant of a Dera he was entitled to possession and management of the properties of its branch Dera.\nThe defendant contended that it was an independent Dera and that he was in possession of the properties as its lawfully appointed Mahant.\nThe trial court decreed the suit but in appeal the decree was reversed.\nWhile the second appeal, preferred by the appellant, was pending in the High Court, the defendant died.\nAs the application to implead the elected successor of the defendant was filed beyond the period prescribed for an application under O. 23, rr. 3 and 4, the High Court held that the appeal had abated and that there was no ground for setting aside the abatement.\nIn appeal to this Court, the appellant contended that even if the Chela, who had been elected as the Mahant on the death of the defendant, was not impleaded within the period prescribed, there would be no abatement, because he represented the Dera.\nAllowing the appeal to this Court, ^ HELD: (1) When a suit is brought by or against a person in a representative capacity and there is a devolution of the interest of the representative, the rule that has to be applied is O. 22, r. 10 and not O. 22, rr. 3 or 4, whether the devolution takes place as a consequence of death or for any other reason.\nThe word 'interest ' in the rule means interest in the property, i.e., the subject matter of the suit, and the interest is the interest of the person who was the party to the suit.\nThis rule is based on the principle that the trial of a suit cannot be brought to an end merely because the interest of a party in the subject matter of the suit has devolved upon another during the pendency of the suit.\nThe suit may be continued against the person acquiring the interest with the leave of the Court.\n[489F G] In the present case, when the defendant died, the interest which was the subject matter of the suit devolved upon his successor elected as the Mahant of the Dera, and therefore, the appeal could be continued under O. 22 r. 10, C.P.C. [489B C] (2) Though it was uncertain on the death of the defendant as to who would become the Mahant by election, it would not make any difference for the application of O. 22, r. 10.\nThe devolution of the interest in the subject matter of the suit took place when the new Mahant was elected.\nThe suit was for possession and management of the Dera and the properties appertaining to it by the appellant purporting to be the de jure Mahant against the defendant as a de facto Mahant.\nThe subject matter of the suit was the interest of the defendant in the Dera and its properties and it devolved upon the new Mahant by virtue of his election subsequent to the death of the defendant.\nAs it was in a representative capacity that he defendant was sued and that it was in the same representative capacity that the appeal was sought to be continued against the new Mahant, O. 23, r. 10 will apply.\n[490B E] Rajnam Pillai vs Natraja Desikar A.I.R. 1924 Madras 615, Thirumalai vs Arunachella, A.I.R. 1926 Madras 540 and Roshan Lal vs Kapur Chand, A.I.R. 1960 Punjab, 382, approved.", + "4917": "A new political party called Telugu Desam swept to power in the 1983 Andhra Pradesh Assembly elections, within a month of assuming office, the new Government of Andhra Pradesh, passed an order No. G.O.M.S. 36 GAD Services dated 8.2.83 (appending two Notifications) stating that in order to provide greater employment opportunities to the youths it had decided to reduce the age of superannuation of all Government employees, other than those in the last grade service, from 58 to 55 years with elect from February 28, 1983.\nOver 18,000 employees and 10,000 public sector employees were superannuated, as a result of the order.\nThe aggreived employees, therefore filed writ petitions and challenged the constitutional validity of the said order and Notifications under Articles 14, 16, 21 and 300A of the Constitution.\nAccording to the petitioners: (i) there was no basis at all for reducing the age of retirement from 58 to 55, as nothing had happened since October 29,1979 on which date the age limit was raised from 55 to 58 years; (ii) providing employment opportunities to the youths has no relevance on the question of fixing the age of retirement; (iii) the government had exercised its power arbitrarily without having regard to factors which are relevant on the fixation of the age of retirement; (iv) the government had acted unreasonably in not giving any previous notice to the employees which would have enabled them to arrange their affairs on the eve of retirement; (v) the government was estopped from reducing the age of retirement to 55 since the employees had acted on the representations made to them in 1979 by increasing the age of retirement from 55 to 58; (vi) as a result of the increase in the age of retirement from 55 to 58 years in 1979, a vested right had accrued to the 580 employees.\nwhich could be taken away if at all, only from future entrants to the government service; (vii) retirement of experienced and mature persons from government service will result in grave detriment to public services of the State (viii) the decision of the government is bad for a total non application of the mind to the relevant facts and circumstances bearing on the question of age of retirement like increased longevity; and (ix) the government had not even considered the enormous delay which would be caused in the payment of pensionary benefits to employees who were retired from service without any pre thought.\nThe respondent State filed two affidavits traverssing each and every ground of challenge and asserted that the age of retirement was reduced because \"it is the duty of the State, within the limits of its economic capacity and development to make effective provisions to solve the unemployment problem which has gone upto 17,84,699 by December 31, 1 982.\nThe contentions of the State were: (i) the question of the age of superannuation was not referred to the One man Pay Commission and therefore, its recommendations to increase the age from 55 to 58 was only casual not based on relevant criteria and has no relevance to the present decision of the State to reduce the age of retirement; (ii) as a result of the unwarranted increase in the age of superannuation from 55 to 58 not only was there a one third increase in the number of unemployed youths but also the chances of promotion of the service personnel had deteriorated resulting in wide spread frustration and unemployment: (iii) the age of retirement was reduced because it is the duty of the State, within its limits of economic capacity and development, to make effective provision to solve the unemployment problem; (iv) the fact that the average expectation of life is about 70 years is not a ground for increasing the age of retirement of Government employees; (v) the general trend was for reducing the age of retirement; (vi) the Government of Kerala and Karnataka had reduced the age of retirement of their employees to 55 and in some other States in India also the age of retirement is 55, (vii) the present decision was taken by the Government in order to fulfill its commitment that it will make welfare measures in order to improve the lot of the common man, and particularly, in order to afford opportunity to qualified and talented unemployed youths whose number was increasing enormously due to expansion of educational facilities; (viii) the present measure was intended to have a salutory effect on the creation of incentives to the deserving employees; and (ix) the question as regards the age of retirement is a pure question of governmental policy affording no cause of action to the petitioners to file the writ petitions.\nRule Nisi was issued on the writ petitions by the court on February 25,1983.\nThe Legislative Assembly of Andhra Pradesh was prorogued on April 9, 1983.\nOn the very next day, i.e. April 10, 1983 the Governor promulgated Ordinance No. 5 of 1983 called the Andhra Pradesh Public Employment (Regulation of conditions of Service) Ordinance, 1983 by which proviso to Rule 2 and Rule 56 of the Andhra Pradesh Fundamental Rules and Rule 231 of the Hyderabad Civil Service Rules the rule governing the age of retirement were omitted.\nDismissing the petitions, the Court ^ HELD: 1.1 Public interest demands that there ought to be an age of retirement in public services.\nThe poin of the peak level of efficiency is bound to differ 581 from individual to individual for that reason.\nA common scheme of general application governing superannuation has, therefore, to be evolved in the light of experience regarding performance levels of employees, the need to provide employment opportunities to the younger sections of society and the need to open up promotional opportunities to employees at the lower levels early in their career.\nInevitably, the public administrator has to counterbalance conflicting claims while determining the age of superannuation.\nOn the one hand, public services cannot be deprived of the benefit of the mature experience of senior employees; on the other hand, a sense of frustration and stagnation cannot be allowed to generate in the minds of the junior members of the services and the younger sections of the society.\nThe balancing of these conflicting claims of the different segments of society involves minute questions of policy and considerations of varying vigour and applicability which must, as far as possible, be left to the judgment of the executive and the legislature.\n[ 90F H; 591A B] E.P. Royappa vs State of Tamil Nadu, ; referred to.\n1.2 While resolving the validity of policy issues like the age of retirement, it is not proper for the Court to put the conflicting claims in a sensitive judicial scale and decide the issue by finding out which way the balance tilts.\nThat s an exercise which the administrator and the legislature have to undertake.\nThis is so because often, the Court has no satisfactory and effective means to decide which alternative, out of the many competing ones, is the best in the circumstances of a given case.\n[591E; C] 1.3 It is not that every question of policy is out side the scope of judicial review or that necessarily, there are no manageable standards for reviewing any and every question of policy.\nIf the age of retirement is fixed at an unreasonably low level so as to make it arbitrary and irrational, the Court 's interference would be called for though not for fixing the age of retirement but for mandating a closer consideration, of the matter.\n[591C D] 2.\nFixing the age of superannuation by reducing it from 58 to 55 would be unreasonable or arbitrary if it does not accord with the principles which are relevant for fixing the age of retirement or if it does not subserve any public interest.\nOn the other hand, the Ordinance shall have to be held valid, if the fundamental premise upon which it proceeds has been accepted as fair and reasonable in comparable situations, if its provisions bear nexus with public interest and if it does not offend against the Constitutional limitations either on legislative competence or on the legislative power to pass laws which bear on fundamental rights.\n[591G H: 592A] 3.1 The report of the One man Pay Commission has to be kept out of consideration in so far as the question of the age of retirement is concerned.\nThe contention that the reversal of the well considered decision of the Commission to raise the age to 58 within a short span of less than three years and a half, as nothing had happened in between warranting a departure from it, is fallacious because the question, as to whether the age of retirement should be raised which was then 55, was not referred to the Commission at all in the terms of reference.\nFurther the decision which the Government took later to increase the age of retirement from 55 to 58 years was not based on the recommendation of the Commission.\n[595D; C] 582 3.2 The Power of a Commission to inquire into a question must depend upon the terms of the reference and not upon the statements made on the floor of the House.\n[595A] 3.3 A review of retirement benefits would undoubtedly cover the examination of the rules or schemes relating to pension, provident fund, gratuity, encasement of leave etc., but it cannot include the power to examine the question as regards the fixation of the age of retirement.\nTherefore, paragraph 9 47 of the report of One man Pay Commission which begins by saying that \"since the terms of reference of the Commission cover the review of the existing retirement benefits, the reference would naturally include the age of retirement\" was an erroneous and unwarranted reading of the terms of the reference.\n[594F; E] 4.1 No law can be said to be bad because it is passed immediately on the assumption of office by a new Government.\nWere this so, every decision taken by a new Government soon after assumption of office shall have to be regarded as arbitrary.\nI 595E] 4.2 The reasonableness of a decision in any jurisdiction, does not depend upon the time which it takes.\nA delayed decision of the Executive can also be bad as offending against the provisions of the Constitution and it can be no defence to the charge of unconstitutionality that the decision was taken after the lapse of a long time.\nConversely, decisions which arc taken promptly cannot be assumed to be bad because they arc taken promptly.\n[595F G] 4.3 Every decision has to be examined on its own merits, in order to determine whether it is arbitrary or unreasonable.\nHere, the State Government had the relevant facts as also the reports of the various Central and State Pay Commissions before it, 011 the basis of which it had taken a reasonable decision to reduce the age of retirement from 58 to 55.\nThe aid and assistance of a well trained bureaucracy which notoriously, plays an important part not only in the implementation of policies but in their making was also available to the Government.\nTherefore, the speed with which the decision was taken cannot, without more, invalidate it on the ground of arbitrariness.\n[59 G; 596.A B] 5.1 By and large, in the formulation of matters of legislative policy, the government of the day must be allowed a free, though fair play and there need not necessarily be a uniform age of retirement all over India.\nThough immutable considerations which are generally or universally true like increased life expectation are as much valid for Jammu and Kashmir as for Tamil Nadu, that cannot justify the conclusion that fixation of the retirement age at 55 in Jammu and Kashmir is invalid since the State of Tamil Nadu has fixed it at 58 or that the age limit should be fixed at 62 or 65.\nThere is no one fixed or focal point of reasonableness.\nThere can be a large and wide area within which the administrator or the legislator can act, without violating the constitutional mandate of reasonableness.\nThat is the area which permits free play in the joints.\n[596C D; F] 5.2 The area between the ages of 55 and 58 is regarded in our country as a permissible field of operation for fixing the are of retirement.\nNeither the American nor the English notions or norms for fixing the retirement age can render invalid the basis which is widely accepted in our country as reasonable for that purpose.\n[597D E] 5.3 On the basis of the data furnished in the White Paper presented to the State Legislative Assembly in March 1983 on the question of \"reduction in 583 the age of superannuation from 58 years to 55 years\" by the new Telugu Desam Party controlled State Government, the reduction of the age of retirement from 58 to 55, in the instant case is not hit by Article 14 or 16 of the Constitution and the State Government or the Legislature has not acted arbitrarily or irrationally.\nThe precedents within our country itself for fixing the retirement age at 55 or for reducing it from 58 to 55 and their acceptance depending upon the employment policy of the Government of the day make it impossible to lay down an inflexible rule that 58 years is a reasonable age for retirement and 55 is not.\nIf the policy adopted for the time being by the Government or the Legislature is shown to violate recognized norms of employment planning, it would be possible to say that the policy is irrational since, in that event, it would not bear reasonable nexus with the object which it seeks to achieve.\nThe reports of the various Commissions show that the creation of new avenues of employment for the youth is an integral part of any policy governing the fixation of retirement age.\nHere, the impugned policy is actuated and influenced predominantly by that consideration.\n[604C F] However, the question of age of retirement should always be examined by the Government with more than ordinary care, more than the State Government has bestowed upon it in this case.\nThe fixation.\nOf age of retirement has minute and multifarious dimensions which shape the lives of citizens.\nTherefore, it is vital from the point of view of their well being that the question should be considered with the greatest objectivity and decided upon the basis of empirical data furnished by scientific investigation.\nWhat is vital f`or the welfare of the citizens is, of necessity, vital for the survival or the State.\nCare must also be taken to ensure that the statistics are not perverted to serve a malevolent purpose.\n[604F H ] 6.\nIt is well settled that Article 311(2) of the Constitution is attracted only when a civil servant is reduced in rank, dismissed or removed from service by way of penalty, that is to say, when the effect of the order passed against him in his behalf is to visit him with evil consequences.\nThe termination of service of an employer on account of his reaching the age of superannuation does not amount to his removal from service within the meaning of Article 311(2).\nHere there being no arbitrariness in the fixation of reduced retirement age, there is no violation of Article 311(2) of the Constitution, either.\n[605C; F] Satish Chandra V Union of India[1953] SCR 655; Shyam Lal vs State of U.P., ; ; State of Bombay vs ,Saubhagchand M. Doshi; , ; Purshotam Lal Dhingra vs Union of India, ; ; P. Balakotiah V. Union of India; , ; Bishun Narain Misra vs State Union of Uttar Pradesh; , , relied on.\nMoti Ram Deka vs General Manager.\nNorth Frontier Railway, ; explained.\nThough an ordinance can be invalidated for contravention of the constitutional limitations which exist upon the power of the State legislature to pass laws it cannot be declared invalid for the reason of non application of mind, any more than any other law call be.\nAn executive act is liable to be struck 584 down on the ground of non application of mind.\nNot the act of a Legislature.\nThe power to issue an ordinance is no an executive power but is the power of the executive to legislate.\nThe power of the Governor to promulgate an ordinance is contained in Article 213 which occurs in Chapter IV of Part VI of the Constitution.\nThe heading of that Chapter is \"Legislative Power of the Governor\".\nThis power is plenary within.\nits field like the power of the State Legislature to pass laws and there are no limitations upon that power except those to which the legislative power of the State Legislature is subject.\n[607C; A B] A.K. ROY vs Union of India.\n; at pp. 282, 291; R K Garg vs Union of India, ; at pp. 964, 967; High Court of Andhra Pradesh vs V V. section Krishnamurthy, ; Motiram Dake vs General Manager, North Frontier Railway, ; distinguished.\nIf a rule of retirement can be deemed to deprive a person of his right to livelihood, it will be impermissible to provide for an age of retirement at all.\nThat will be contrary to public interest because the Slate cannot afford the luxury of allowing Its employees o continue in service after they have passed the point of peak performance.\nRules of retirement do not take away the right of a person to his livelihood: they limit his right to hold office to a stated number of years.\n[608D E] 9.1 The burden to establish mala fides is a heavy burden to discharge.\nVague and casual allegations suggesting that a certain act was done with an ulterior motive cannot be accepted without proper pleadings and adequate proof, both of which are conspicuously absent in these writ petitions.\nBesides the ordinance making power being a legislative power, the argument of mala fides is misconceived.\nThe legislature, as a body, cannot be accused of having passed a law for an extraneous purpose.\nIf no reasons are so stated as appear from the provisions enacted by it.\nIts reasons for passing a law or those that are stated in the Objects and Reasons.\nEven assuming that the executive, in a given case, has an ulterior motive in moving a legislation, that motive cannot render the passing of the law mala fide.\nThis kind of 'transferred malice ' is unknown in the field of legislation.\n[608G H; 609A B] 9.2 The amendment made to the Fundamental Rules in the exercise of power conferred by Articles 309 by which the proviso to Rule 2 was deleted reirospectively, with effect from February 23, 1983 by G.O.M.S. dated P 17 2 83 was a valid exercise of legislative power.\nThe rules and amendments made under the proviso to Article 309 can be altered or repealed by the Legislature but until that is done the exercise of the power cannot be challenged as lacking in authority.\n[610B C] 9.3 It is well settled that the service rules can be as much amended, as they can be mader, under the proviso to Article 309 and that, the power to amend these rules carries with it the power to amend them retrospectively.\nThe power conferred by the proviso to Article 309 is of a legislative character and is to be distinguished from an ordinary rule making power.\nThe power to legislate is of a plenary nature within the field demarcated by the Constitution and it includes the power to legislate retrospectively.\n[609H; 610A B] B.s.\nVadera vs Union of India, ; 582 55, Raj Kumar vs Union of India [ , 965, followed 585", + "6622": "Each of the appellants/petitioners is a registered dealer in the State of Haryana.\nHe purchased certain raw materials in the State without paying purchase tax thereon, in view of the provision contained in section 24 of the Haryana Sales Tax Act, 1973.\nHe manufactured certain goods in the State with the aid of the said raw materials.\nHe then sold the manufactured goods to dealers who, in turn, export ed those goods out of India.\nOn these facts the assessee claimed that he was not liable to pay the purchase tax on the raw materials, imposed under section 9(1) of the Sales Tax Act.\nThe Department denied the relief on the short ground that the sales effected by the appellants were not sales in the course of export outside India within the meaning of section 5(1) of the .\nAc cording to the Department, they were only \"penultimate\" sales, which may be deemed to be 'export sales ' because of the fiction created under section 5(3) of the C.S. Act 1956, but that was not enough to escape from the clutches of the charge in section 9(1).\nAccordingly, the claim of the asses see was rejected by the taxing authorities.\nThe High Court also rejected the assessee 's petition.\nBefore this Court, it was contended on behalf of the assessees that the effect of section 5(3) of the C.S.T. Act was to expand the scope of section 5(1) and include within the concept of sales in the course of export outside India also the 'penultimate ' sales; that a reference to, and the meaning of, section 5(1) could not be understood without a reference to section 5(3); and that as a result of section 5(3), such penultimate sales became export sales falling beyond the purview and competence of State legislature.\nIt was further submitted that purchases of 344 raw material used in the manufacture of goods inside the State attracted the tax under section 9(1) unless those manufactured goods were dealt with in one of three ways; (1) disposed of by way of sale inside the State; (2) despatched to a place outside the State but by way of a sale in the course of inter State trade or commerce; or (3) despatched to a place outside the State but by way of sale in the course of export outside the territory of India.\nIn the alternative, it was contended that as the asses see had sold goods to other parties in India, those sales must be either local sales or inter state sales; and that in any view of the matter, it would be a sale covered by the exceptions in section 9(1), and the assessee 's purchases of raw material would not attract tax under section 9(1).\nOn the other hand, on behalf of the State it was, inter alia contended that there were no facts on record to sub stantiate the claim on behalf of the assessee that the sales in question fulfilled the conditions set out in section 5(3) of the C.S.T. Act.\nIt was submitted that the assessees would be entitled to an exemption from the impugned purchase tax only if their sales were export Sales within the meaning of section 5(1) of the C.S.T. Act, which they admittedly were not.\nAlternatively, it was submitted that section 9(1)(b) had been declared unconstitutional by this Court in the Goodyear case ; and the assessee could seek no implied exemption from its language.\nTherefore, if section 9 was left out, the language of section 6 ( as amended) which brought to charge all purchases and sales in the State would be attracted and so the impugned taxation of purchases would be in order.\nAllowing the appeals and the petitions, this Court, HELD: (1) The language of section 9(1)(a)(ii) later section 9(1) (b) using the words \"within the meaning of sub section (1) of section 5 of the \" have to be given full meaning; in other words, the exemption under section 9(1) has to be restricted only to export sales failing within the scope of section 5(1).\n[360F G] Mohammed Sirajuddin vs State, [1975] Supp. 1 SCR 169, re ferred to.\n(2) The language of the two provisions simultaneously introduced in section 24(1)(a) and (b) makes interesting reading.\nThe proviso to 345 clause (a) refers only to \"sale by him in the course of export outside the territory of India within the meaning of section 5 of the \" whereas the proviso to clause (b) refers to \"sale by him in the course of export outside the territory of India within the meaning of sub section (3) of section 5 of the \".\nThus, the statute, within the same provision, has made a distinction between a sale in the course of export within the meaning of section 5 and such a sale within the meaning of section 5(3).\n[361C D] (3) The High Court was right in concluding that the assessee was not entitled to the exemption under section 9 because the sales made by him were not sales in the course of export outside the territory of India within the meaning of section 5(1) of the .\n[362A] (4) What was declared unconstitutional by this Court when it declared section 9(1)(b) of the Act unconstitutional in Goodyear case was only the levy of a tax where raw mate rials were purchased and used inside the State for the manufacture of finished goods which were then simply and without any sale despatched rather, consigned outside the State.\nThere is, however, nothing unconstitutional about the two other consequences that flow on the language of the clause: one express and the other implied; one in favour of the Revenue and the other in favour of the assessee, viz. (1) that there will be a tax on the purchase of the raw materials if the manufactured goods are disposed of in the State itself otherwise than by way of sale; and (2) that there will be no tax on the purchase of the raw materials if the manufactured goods are despatched from the State conse quent on a (i) local sale; (ii) inter State sale; or (iii) a sale in the course of export.\nThese two aspects of section 9(1)(b) survive even after the judgment of this Court in the Goodyear case.\n[363G H; 364A C] Goodyear, case ; , explained.\n(5) Section 9(1) is both a charging and exempting sec tion.\nEven after the decision in Goodyear case the charge under a part of clause (b) still survives and so also the exemption provided in the latter part of clause (b).\n[364E; C] (6) Since the sales effected by the assessee fail within one of the three exempted categories set out in section 9(1)(b), there can be no levy of purchase tax under section 9(1) of the Sales Tax Act.\n[363C] (7) The purchase of raw materials by the assessees are not 346 chargeable to tax either under section 9(1)or section 6 or section 24(3).\n[366G]", + "1329": "The respondents firm claimed exemption from Sales Tax under article 286(i)(b) of the Constitution in respect of sales 925 made by them of cotton and castor oil on the ground that the sales were on F.O.B. contracts under which they continued to be the owners of the goods till those crossed the custom barrier and entered the export stream.\nThey also contested the purchase tax to which they were assessed under section 10(b) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act.\nThe High Court upheld the contention of the respondents regarding the Sales Tax but held that they were liable to pay purchase tax.\nOn appeal by both the parties Held, that the goods remained the seller 's property till those had been brought and loaded on board the ship and so the sales were exempted from tax under article 286(i) of the Constitution.\nThe word \" a person \" in section 10(b) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act had been correctly interpreted as \" a registered dealer \" and the purchasing dealers had been rightly assessed to purchase tax.\nThe normal rule in F. 0.\nB. contracts was that the property was intended to pass and did pass on the shipment of the goods.\nThe presumption in F. 0.\nB. contracts was that it was the duty of the buyer to obtain the necessary export licence, though in the circumstances of a particular case that duty might fall on the seller.\nH.O. Brandt & Co. vs H. N. Morris & Co. Ltd., [1917] 2 K.B. 784 and M. W. Hardy & Co. vs A. V. Pound & Co., Ltd., (1953) 1.Q.B. 499, considered.\n\"Export \" under the Import and Export Control Act having been defined as \" taking out of India by land, sea or air \" it could not, under the Export Control Order, be held to have commenced till the ship carrying the goods left the port or in some cases passed the territorial waters.\nThe State of Bombay vs The United Motors (India) Ltd., (1953) 4 S.T.C. 133, held inapplicable.", + "3893": "Explanation (b) to section 125(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 provides that \"wife\" includes a woman who has been divorced by or has obtained a divorce from her husband and has not re married.\nSection 127(3) (b) provides that where any order has been made under section 125 in favour of a woman who has been divorced by or has obtained a divorce from her husband, the Magistrate shall if he is satisfied that the woman has been divorced by her husband and has received, whether before or after the date of the said order, the whole of the sum which under any customary or personal law applicable to the parties, was payable on such divorce cancel such order in the circumstances stated therein.\nThe respondent (husband) married the appellant (wife) and had a son by her.\nA few years later the respondent divorced his wife.\nBy a consent decree, in the suit filed by the wife, he transferred to her the flat in which she was living and agreed to pay mehar money.\nThe compromise stated that the \"plaintiff declares that she has now no claim or right whatsoever against the defendant\".\nFor some time thereafter they lived together but again separated.\nThe wife moved the magistrate under section 125 Cr.P. for grant of maintenance to her and her son.\nThis was granted.\nOn appeal the Sessions Judge held mat the Court had no jurisdiction under section 125.\nThe High Court dismissed the wife 's appeal.\nOn further appeal to this Court it was contended on behalf of the respondent that (i) section 125(4) would apply in the absence of proof that the wife was not living separately by mutual consent; (ii) to attract section 125 there must be proof of neglect to maintain the wife and (iii) no claim for maintenance in this case can survive in the face of the consent decree whereby mehar money had been paid and all claims adjusted.\nAllowing the appeal the Court, G ^ HELD: Every divorcee, otherwise eligible, is entitled to the benefit of maintenance allowance and the dissolution of the marriage makes no difference to this right under the current Code.\n[78H] 1.\nThere is no force in the argument that the absence of mutual consent to live separately must be made out if the hurdle of section 125(4) is to be overcome.\nThe compulsive conclusion from a divorce by a husband and his provision of a separate residence as evidenced by the consent decree fills the bill.\nDivorce plainfully implies that the husband orders.\nthe wife out of the conjugal home.\n[80D] 76 2.\nThe husband 's plea is his right to ignore.\nSo the basic condition of neglect to maintain is satisfied.\nIn this generous jurisdiction the broader perception and appreciation of the facts and their bearing must govern the verdict not chopping little logic or tinkering with burden of proof.\n[80C] 3.\n(a) The consent decree resolved all disputes and settled all claims then available.\nThe new statutory right which could not have been in the contemplation of the parties when they entered into the consent decree in 1962 had been created by the Code of 1973.\nNo settlement of claim which does not have the special statutory right of the divorcee under section 125 can operate to negate that claim.\n[80F] (b) No husband can claim under section 127(3)(b) absolution from his obligation under section 125 towards a divorced wife except on proof of payment of a sum stipulated by customary or personal law whose quantum is more or less sufficient to do duty for maintenance allowance.\n[81F] (c) Section 127 cannot rescue the husband from his obligation.\nThe scheme of Chapter IX has a social purpose.\nIll used wives and desperate divorcees shall not be driven to material and moral dereliction to seek sanctuary in the streets.\nWhere the husband, by customary payment at the time of divorce, has adequately provided for the divorcee.\na subsequent series of recurrent doles is contra indicated and the husband liberated.\nThe key note thought is adequacy of payment which will take reasonable care of the wife 's maintenance.\n[80H] (d) The payment of illusory amounts by way of customary or personal law requirement will be considered in the reduction of maintenance rate but cannot annihilate that rate unless it is a reasonable substitute The legal sanctity of the payment is certified by the fulfilment of the social obligation, not by a ritual exercise rooted in custom.\nNo construction which leads to frustration of the statutory project can secure validation if the Court is to pay true homage to the Constitution.\nThe only just construction of the section is that Parliament intended divorcees should not derive a double benefit If the first payment by way of mehar or ordained by custom has a reasonable relation to the object and is a capitalised substitute for the order under section 125 then section 127(3) (b) subserves the goal and relieves the obligor.\nnot pro tanto but wholly the purpose of the payment \"under any customary or personal law\" must be to obviate destitution of the divorcee and to provide her with wherewithal to maintain herself There must be a rational relation between the cum so paid and its potential as provision for maintenance.\n[81B C] 4.\nWelfare laws must be so read as to be effective delivery systems of the salutary objects sought to be served by the Legislature and when the beneficiaries are the weaker sections, like destitute women, the spirit of article 15(3) must belight the meaning of the section.\nThe Constitution is a pervasive omnipresence brooding over the meaning and transforming the values of every measure.", + "5888": "The appellant has bid in an auction of Beni Country Liquor Shop in the District of Samastipur and was given the shop being the highest bidder but he failed to deposit the bid money in time.\nThe Collector, Samastipur by an order cancelled the bid and black listed the appellant.\nHe then moved the High Court against the order of the Collector.\nThe High Court upheld the order of the Collector.\nThe appellant appealed to this Court by special leave.\nDisposing of the appeal, the Court, HELD: 1.\nIt is an implied principle of the rule of law that any order having civil consequences should be passed only after following the principles of natural justice.\nBlack listing any person in respect of business ventures has civil consequences for the future business of the person concerned in any event.\n[868H; 869A] 2.\nEven if the rules do not express so, it is an elementary principle of natural justice that parties affected by any order should have right of being heard and making representations against the order.\n[869B] In the instant case, that portion of the order directing that the appellant be placed in the black list in respect of future contracts under the Collector is set aside.\nSo far as the cancellation of the bid of the appellant is concerned, that is not affected.\n[869B C]", + "6521": "Two separate properties bearing Door Nos. 2 and 3 ad measuring 41 grounds and 2005 sq. ft., which originally formed part of an extent of land, situate at Mount Road, Madras belonged to several co owners, who leased out the same to the Respondent, by two separate lease deeds (exhibit P 1 and P 2) item 1 and 2 in the Schedule A to the plaint.\nThe property contained in Door No. 2 which comprised an area of 4 grounds and 151 sq ft with certain buildings was given on rent for Rs. 150 p.m., whereas the property contained in Door No. 3 which also had some buildings thereon was let out for Rs.200 p.m.\nThe owners sold the properties to the United India Life Assurance Co. and the New Guardian of India Life Insurance Co. Ltd. in July 1953.\nIn 1956, the Life Insurance Corpora tion of India, the appellant stepped into the shoes of the said companies The appellant moved two applications before the Rent Controller for fixation of a 'fair rent ' for each of the premises; In respect of the property in Door No. 2, the rent claimed was Rs.2,399/03 while in respect of the other, the rent claimed was Rs.3266/50p.\nThe tenants claimed that, under both the lease deeds, what had been leased out to them was only a vacant land and since the superstructure had been built by them, they were entitled to relief under the Madras City Tenants ' Protection Act.\nIt was further contended that the Rent Controller had no jurisdiction to fix a fair rent.\nThe Rent Controller accepted the contention of the tenant so far as item No. 1 (property at Door No. 2) was concerned but with regard to the second property (Door No. 3), he fixed the fair rent at Rs. 1451 p.m.\nThere were then two appeals to the Court of Small Causes.\nThe Small Causes Court came to the conclusion that the buildings on the land leased vide P 1 had also been conveyed to the appellant and that the LIC was entitled to seek fixation of fair rent in respect of this premises also.\nHowever the order of the Rent Controller in regard to the 546 other property in Door No. 3 was upheld.\nHowever, in certain earlier proceedings for fixation of fair rent etc., it had been held by the Rent Controller that item No. (Door No. 2) belonged to the LIC, but his order of eviction had been set aside by the appellate court on some other ground.\nThe Court of Small Causes did not treat that decision as res judicata.\nThe tenants being aggrieved by the order of the Court of Small Causes filed revision petitions but they were dis missed on 20.11.1968.\nThe appellant thereupon filed Civil Suit against the tenants respondents for recovery of arrears of rent together with interests etc.\non the basis of the fair rent fixed.\nThe respondents tenants also filed a civil suit claiming protec tion under the Madras City Tenants ' Protection Act but this suit and further appeals therefrom were dismissed.\nIn the suit for recovery of rent filed by the appellant, the ten ants contended that since the subject matter of the lease under exhibit P 1 was only a vacant site, the Rent Controller had no jurisdiction to fix the fair rent in respect thereof and that, therefore, the claim in the suit for arrears of rent, based on the Rent Controller 's order in respect of the premises covered by exhibit P 1 had to fail.\nThe trial Judge in the High Court came to the conclusion that exhibit P 1 did not, in law, create a valid lease between the co owners and the tenants.\nHe further held that the superstructure constructed on the land had been conveyed to the vendee under the sale deed dated 30.7.1953 and thus vested in LIC.\nOn this reason ing the High Court held that the Rent Controller had juris diction to fix the fair rent in respect of the premises.\nThe tenants filed an appeal.\nThe appellate Bench confirmed the decree in respect of Item 2 but as regards Item No. 1, the Appellate Bench vacated the decree passed by the trial Court.\nIt held that there was a valid lease between the owners and the tenants under Exts.\nP 1 and P 2.\nThe appel lant Bench held that the Rent Controller had no jurisdiction to entertain the application for fixation of fair rent in respect of the property which was only a vacant piece of land.\nThus, the Court held that the LIC could not maintain the suit for recovery of rent based on the order made by the statutory tribunal under the Rent Control Act.\nThe tenants ' appeal was accordingly partly allowed.\nLIC came up in appeal to this Court against the said order, after obtaining special leave.\nTwo questions arose for determination by this Court viz., (1) Was the LIC the vendee only of a vacant land with no title to the buildings standing on the site in Item 1, and (2) it open for the tenants to contend that the order of the Court of Small Causes in the earlier rent 547 control proceedings deciding to the contrary, and fixing the fair rent of item 1 could be completely ignored as an order passed totally without jurisdiction though it had become final between the parties? Dismissing the appeal, this Court, HELD: There are clear indications in the Act and rules that the Rent Controller does not have the jurisdiction to decide questions of title.\nIn a proceeding under the Act, whether it be for fixation of fair rent or eviction, the tenant may raise several objections.\nHe may, inter alia, take the point that the opposite party is not the landlord.\n[561C D] All that the Rent Controller has to do is to satisfy himself that the person seeking eviction or fixation of fair rent is a 'landlord ' who has, prima facie, the right to receive the rent of the property in question.\nThat the Rent Controller 's jurisdiction on this issue is limited is clear from the proviso to Section 10(1) of the Act.\n[561 F G] The extensive jurisdiction conferred on civil courts under Section 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure should not be curtailed without a specific statutory warrant or except on some clear principle.\nThere is nothing in the Tamil Nadu Rent Control Act which, in any way, takes away, or narrows down, the civil court 's jurisdiction as, for example, there is in the Delhi Rent Control Act (Section 50).\n[569G H] Section 4 of the Rent Control Act provides only a ma chinery for fixation of fair rent in respect of certain premises.\nIt is the quantum of fair rent that arises for determination by the Rent Controller.\nThere is no doubt that, since an application for this purpose cannot lie except at the instance of a landlord or a tenant, the Rent Controller has to deal with this incidentally but this is not one of the direct issues before the Rent Controller.\nIf and only if, this relationship exists between the parties, the Rent Controller steps in for a limited purpose to determine what the fair rent is and then fades out of the picture.\nWhere a fair rent is fixed by a Controller, the Rent Control Act does not provide for a machinery for recov ery of the amount.\nThe amount has to be recovered by the landlord only by recourse to a civil court.\nThis gives an indication that the determination of the relationship that gives rise to the application is also not conclusive.\nThis is indeed made clear by the provisions relating to eviction.\n[570B E] If the civil court in the instant case, had come to the conclusion that there is a relationship of a landlord and a tenant, and that the LIC 548 was entitled to recover the rent from the tenants, it will have to pass a decree in favour of the LIC on the basis of the fair rent fixed by the Rent Controller.\nIt will not be open to the civil court to re determine the rent payable by the tenant to the landlord because that is a matter squarely and exclusively within the jurisdiction of the Rent Control ler and, therefore, impliedly excluded from the purview of the civil court.\nBut his decision is not final on the issue that opens up his jurisdiction and cannot preclude an owner from contending, in a civil court, that he should not be asked to pay rent for his own property to some one else.\n[570F H] There is no reason to hold that contract between a person with himself and others is invalid.\n[571A] Krishnamurthy vs Parthasarathy, AIR 1949 Mad. 780; Manibhai Hathibhai vs Arbuthnot, AIR 1947 Bom.\n413; Rai Brij Raj vs Shaw, ; at 147, 150; Official Trustee vs Sachindranath; , & 99 pp.\nAntulay vs Nayak, ; at 649, 677 and 700; Trideshwar Dayal vs Maheshwar Dayal; , at 1437; Shiv Chander Kapoor vs Amar Bose, ; paras 22 and 23: Palaniappa Chettiar and Ors.\nvs Vairavan Chettiar, [19631 76 L.W. 21; Palaniappa Chettiar vs Babu Sahib alias Sheik Mytheen Sahib and Ors., [1964] 77 LW 551; Salay Mohamed Sail etc.\nvs Jaffer Mohamed Sait 's Memorial Dispensary Charity and Ors., [1969] 1 Andhra Weekly Reporter (S.C. 16); Bhagwan Dayal vs Reoti Devi, ; ; Desika Charyulu vs State of Andhra Pradesh and Ant., AIR 1964 SC 807; Dhulabhai vs State, ; ; Mathura Prasad Bajoo Jaiswal and Ors.\nvs Dossibai N.B. Jee jeebhoy, [1070] 3 SCR 830; Jeeth Kaur and Ors.\nvs Smt.\nP. Rondalamma and Ant., AIR 1983 A.P. 219 and State of Tamil Nadu vs Ramalinga Samigal Madam and Ors.", + "3602": "(1 ) When a provisional inter State seniority list is prepared for integrating services after States re organisa tion, there is a possibility of some mistakes occurring about the facts of a case or in the .application of the relevant statute or rules or executive directions governing seniority.\nIt would, therefore, be quite fair to give the person affected an opportunity to be heard against the proposed list before it is made final under 8. 115.\nState Reorganisation Act, 1956, so that.\nany possible mistakes, either in the facts relating to his case or in the law or rule applied with regard to the proposed assignment of a place to him in the seniority list may be rectified.\nBut, once he had that opportunity.\nit cannot be said that he should have a further opportunity against even a final seniority list, for then such a list would not really be final but will only he provisional or preliminary.\n[830 C D] (2) But, even a final list, if it is prepared contrary to the rules applicable or is vitiated on some ground show ing that a condition precedent to the finalisation of the list is absent, or a particular decision is malafide or arrived at on totally irrelevant or extraneous considera tions.\nsuch a final list could be declared invalid by the Court.\nG] In the present case.\nthe officer was not satisfied with the position given to him the final seniority list.\nBut, since he had an opportunity Under the integration rules of the State for filing objections against the preliminary provisional list, he cannot urge that he should he heard again alter the final list was prepared.[829 A] He cannot claim to have a say against the final list on the analogy of a second opportunity to show cause against a proposed punishment in a departmental enquiry, because.\nno element of punishment is involved in preparing either a provisional or a final seniority list.\n[830 B] He is not entitled to any relief because he had not made out in his petition to the Court any of the grounds on which a final list can be assailed.\n[831 G] Union of India vs\nG.M. Shankariah & Ors. etc.\n(S.L.R. 1969 p. 1 ) (C As.\n1439 & 1446 of 1967 decided on 16 10 1968) explained.\nUnion of India & Anr.\nv P.K. Roy & Ors.\n[1968] 2 S.C.R. 186 @ 202 and Union of India vs\nG.R. Prabhavalkar & Ors. ; at 2106, followed.", + "6647": "The petitioners, carrying,on import export of diamonds, field applications for registration as Export Houses and grant of Additional Import Licences under Para 174 and 176 of the Import and Export Policy 1978 79 which were rejected by the authorities on the ground that they have failed to diversify their exports of \"other products\" during the year 1977 78.\nThey challenged the order of the authorities by filing writ petitions before the Bombay High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution.\nOne of the petitions was dismissed by a learned single judge of the High Court and the said petitions filed an appeal before a Division Bench of the High Court.\nDuring the pendency of the appeal 233 and the writ petition,the Supreme Court by its order dated April 18, 1985 decided the case of Union of India vs Rajnikant Bros. holding that there was no requirement of diversification of exports as a condition for the grant of Export Houses Certificates in the Import Export Policy for the year 1978 79 but the grantee of Additional Licences were not only prohibited from importing items which were excluded in the Export Policy 1978 79 but also from importing items excluded under the Import Policy prevailing at the time import.\nThe High Court decided the cases of the petitioners in accordance with the decision of this Court in Union of India vs Rajnikant Bros. Purusant to the decision of the Bombay High Court petitioners were granted Export House Certificates and Additional Import Licences which were valid for 12 months, with the same condition as provided by this Court in its order dated April18, 1985 in the case of Rajnikant.\nHowever, the petitioners were not able to make imports under the said licences till 31st March,1988.On 1.4.1988, the Government of India issued a revised Export and Import Policy for the period 1988 91.Under Para 215 of the said revised policy certain flexibilities were granted in the matter of imports to the grantees of Additional Import Licences.\nHowever, under para 218(10) of the said revised Policy the holdersof the Additional Import Licences issuedprior to 1.4.1988 were made ineligible for the benefit of flexibilities in import as contained in para 215(4).\nSince ,the petitioners were holding licences issued prior to 1.4.1988 they could not avail the flexibilities in import as contained in Para 215 of the 1988 91 Policy.\nConsequently, they filed writ petitions in this Court challenging the validity of para218(10) of the 1988 91 Policy contending (i) that all the Export Houses who were granted Additional Licences constitute at single class and their classification on the basis of date or on the basis of period of exports has no connection with the object sought to be achieved by the 1988 91 policy; (ii) that Para 218(10) of 1988 91 Policy arbitrarily discriminates between Export Houses who were issued Additional Licences prior to 1.4.1988 since the benefits ofPara 214 of 1988 91 Policy were conferred only on the latter; (iii) that in view of the judgement of this Court in C.Naveenchandra and Co. vs Union of India, [1987] 2 S.C.R. 989 the petitioners should be treated at par with the grantees of Additional Licences under the Export Policy for the subsequent years and since there has been relaxation in the matter of policy of canalisation of imports under Para 215(4) in respect Additional Licences granted to Export Houses under the 1988 91 Policy, the petitioners were also entitled to a similar relaxation.\nDismissing the petitions, this Court, 234 HELD: 1.\nThe right to equality guaranteed under Article 14 ensures equality amongst equals and its aim is to protect persons similarly placed against discriminatory treatment.\nIt means that all persons similarly circumstance shall be treated alike both in privileges conferred and liabilities imposed.\nConversely discrimination may result if persons dissimilarily situate are treated equally.\nEven amongst persons similarly situate differential treatment wouldbe permissible between one class and the other.\nIn that event it is necessary that the differential treatment should be founded on an intelligible differentia which distinguishes persons or things that are grouped together from others left out of the group and that differentia must have a rational relation tothe object sought to be achieved by the statute in question.\n[242H, 243A B] 2.\nA close examination of the Import & Export Policy 1978 79 and the Import & Export Policy 1988 91 shows that there is material difference between the conditions for grant of Additional licences under Import Policy 1978 79 and the conditions for grant of such licences under the Import Policy 1988 91.\nWhile in the Import & Export policy 1978 79 the emphasis was only on the f.o.b. value of exports without taking into account the outgo of foreign exchange in importing the goods required for achieving the exports by an Export House and Additional licences were granted for a much larger amount at a higher percentage on the basis of the f.o.b.value of the exports, where as in the Import & Export Policy 1988 91 there is a more realistic appraisal of actual benefit to the country ' economy by the exports by taking into account the net foreign exchange earnings after deducting the value of the imports and additional licences are issued on the basis of the net foreign exchange earnings for a much lesser value on a smaller percentage.\nTherefore, the basis for the grant of Additional Licences which are entitled to relaxation in import under the 1988 91 Policy is different from the basis on which Additional Licences were granted under the 1978 79 policy.\n[243C, 245B C,248A] 3.\nThe petitioners were not granted Additional Licences on the basis of net foreign exchange earnings and they have secured the Additional Licences on the basis of f.o.b. value of the exports, without taking into account the value of goods imported by them for achieving the exports.\nIt cannot be said that the petitioners who have been granted Additional Licences under the 1978 79 Policy and the Export Houses who were granted Additional Licences under the 1988 91 Policy are persons similarly circumstanced.\nTherefore the petitioners cannot claim the same facilities that have been provided to Export Houses who are granted Additional Licences under the 1988 91 Policy.\nHence they have failed to make out a case for interference by this Court under 235 Article 32 and consequently they cannot assail the validity of Para 218(10) of the Import & Export Policy 1988 91.[245E, 243D, 245F, 249C, 248B] 4.\nExport Houses, like the petitioners, who were granted Additional Licences on the basis of order of this Court dated April 18, 1985 are not to be treated at par with Export Houses who are granted Additional Licences under the Import & Export Policy prevalent at the time of import.\nImport of canalised items under Additional Licences issued to the petitioners would be permissible if the import policy prevailing at the time of import permits them to import such items.\nTherefore the rights of the petitioners under the Additional Licences issued to them would be governed by the terms of the Import Policy prevailing at the time of import.[246A B, 247E, 247H] D. Naveenchandra & Co. Bombay & Anr.\nvs Union of India Raj Prakash Chemicals Ltd. & Anr.\nvs Union of India & Ors.\n, ; ; Union of India vs Godrej Soaps Pvt . Ltd., [1986]3 S.C.R. 771; Union of India vs Rajnikant Bros., Civil Appeal No. 1423 of 1984 decided on 18.4.1985; Indo Afghan Chamber of Commerce vs Union of India, , referred to.\nB. Vijay Kumar & Co. etc.\nvs Collector of Central Excise and Customs, ; ; held inapplicable.", + "6157": "The appellant company/assessee manufactures and sells fusel oil/ styrene Monomer falling under Tariff Item No. 68 of the 1st Schedule to the .\nThe said fusel oil/styrene Monomer is sold in bulk and generally delivered to the customers at the appellant 's factory in road tankers.\nSome times it is supplied in drums brought by the customers who are not charged anything for those drums.\nIn the case of Styrene Monomer, the finding is that the supply was in tankers to the extent of 90% and only 10% of the sales were made in drums.\nTwo notices were issued to the appellant to show cause as to why the value of the drums should not be included in the assessable value of the goods.\nIn reply, the appellant contended that as the drums were supplied by the buyer the value thereof could not be included in the assessable value.\nThe Assistant Collector however included the value of the drums in the assessable value of the said fusel oil/Styrene Monomer.\nThe Collector (Appeals) allowed the appellant 's appeal and held that it was not open to the Assistant Col lector to inflate the assessable value without establishing the receipt of the additional consideration by the appellant apart from what had been shown in the invoice.\nThe Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal allowed the further appeal filed by the Revenue and held that at the time of removal the goods were delivered from the factory in packed condition and the containers were not returnable by the buyer, therefore, the value had to be included in the assessable value.\nBefore this Court it was contended on behalf of the appellant that it was not all packing that was liable to be included under section 4(4)(d)(i) of the Customs and Central Excises Act, it was only that degree of secon 975 dary packing which was necessary for the assessable article to be placed in the condition in which it was sold in the wholesale market at the factory.\ngate which could be includ ed in the assessable value of the article; fusel oil/Styrene Monomer was sold in bulk and was capable of being so sold, hence it was not necessary for the said fusel oil/Styrene Monomer to be supplied to the customer in drums; the duty of excise was payable on manufactured goods and no duty of excise could be collected from the appellant on such drums which were neither manufactured nor purchased by the appel lant; the duty being on the activity of manufacture whatever was necessary to bring the goods into existence alone could be taken into account for duty purposes; and the sub section did not contemplate the inclusion of the cost of packing in the value of goods when the packing was supplied by a cus tomer to a manufacturer on its own cost.\nOn behalf of the Revenue the learned Attorney General contended that the value of drums/containers would also have to be included on a correct interpretation of charging sections, namely, sections 3 and 4 of the Act; the terms of section 4(4)(d)(i) were very clear and specific; it was a well settled principle of construction that in taxing stat utes one had only to look at what was clearly stated, and there was no room for any intendment; percentages of sales did not in any manner affect determination of the assessable value of the excisable goods; though \"manufacture\" was the taxable event, the measure of the levy need not be and was not to be restricted to the cost of manufacture; it is open to Parliament to prescribe any measure by reference to which the charge was to be levied and this is what was done under section 4; and in construing section 4(4)(d)(i).\nall that had to be seen was whether the goods were delivered in packed conditions and if this question was answerable in the af firmative, then, in respect of the goods so sold, the cost of packing, whether incurred by the manufacturer or by the supplier, had to be automatically included in the assessable value, if necessary, by addition to the sale price, except only where the packing was of durable nature and returnable to the manufacturer.\nAllowing the appeals, this Court, HELD: (1) The correct position must be found out bearing in mind the essential nature of excise duty.\nExcise duty is a duty on the act of manufacture.\nManufacture under the excise law is the process of activity which brings into being articles which are known in the market as goods and to be goods these must be different, identifiable and distinct articles known to the market as such.\nIt is then and then only that 976 manufacture takes place attracting duty.\n[986B] (2) Section 2(f) of the Central Excises & Salt Act provides the definition of the term \"manufacture\".\nIt states, inter alia, that manufacture includes any process incidental or ancillary to the completion of manufactured product.\nIn the instant case, the drums even though these were ancillary or incidental to the supply of fusel oil and styrene monomer, these were not necessary to complete the manufacture of fusel oil or styrene monomer.\n[983B C, 987D] (3) In order to be 'manufacture ', there must be activity which brings transformation to the article in such a manner that different and distinct article comes into being which is known as such in the market. 'If in order to be able to put it on the market, a certain amount of packing or user of containers or wrappers or putting them either in drums or containers, are required, then the value or the cost of such wrapper or container or drum must be included in the assess able value and if the price at which the goods are sold does not include that value then it must be so included by the very force of the terms of the section.\n[986C E] (4) The clear implication of the use of the word \"cost\" in relation to packing in the clause (i) of section 4(4)(d) of the Act is that only packing cost of which is incurred by the assessee, i.e. the seller, is to be included.\nThe use of the expression \"cost\" could not obviously be by way of reference to packing for which the cost is incurred by the buyer.\n[988B] Union of India & Ors.\nvs Bombay Tyre International Ltd., ; ; Collector of Central Excise vs Indian Oxygen Ltd., ; K. Radha Krishaiah vs In spector of Central Excise, Gooty & Ors., ; Govind Pay Oxygen Ltd. vs Asstt.\nCollector of Central Ex cise, Panaji & Ors., ; Alembic Glass Indus tries Ltd. vs Union of India & Ors., ; Gur Sahai Sehgal vs Commissioner of Income Tax, Punjab, ; ; A.K. Roy vs Voltas Ltd., ; Atic Industries Ltd. vs H.H. Dave Assistant Collector of Central Excise, ; Union of India vs Godfrey Phillips India Ltd., [1985] Supp. 3 SCR 123; Union of India vs Delhi Cloth & General Mills Ltd., [1963] Supp. 1 SCR 586; South Bihar Sugar Mills Ltd., etc.\nvs Union of India & Ors.\n, ; ; Bhor Industries Ltd., Bombay vs Collector of Central Excise, Bombay, ; and Union of India vs Godfrey Phillips Ltd., , referred to.\n977 (5) On the facts of this case, it is clear that the goods were not sold in drums generally in the course of the wholesale trade.\nThere was no evidence that there was any necessity of packing or putting these in drums prior to their sale, or to be able to generally to enter the stream of wholesale trade or to be marketable.\nOn the other hand, there was evidence that in the wholesale trade, these goods were delivered directly in tankers and deliverable as such.\nBut as a matter of fact, delivery in drums was only to facilitate their transport in small quantities.\nThe manufac ture of the goods was complete before these were placed in drums.\nThe completely manufactured product was stored in tanks.\nFrom these tanks the goods were removed directly and placed in vehicles for their movement for 90% of the sales, the vehicle of removal was tankers and for 10% of the sales, the vehicle or removal was drums.\nIn the premises, the value of the drums with regard to the fusel oil/ styrene monomer irrespective of whether these were supplied by the assessee or not.\nare not includible in the assessable value of the Styrene Monomer.\n[992A D] Per section Ranganathan, J. (agreeing with the conclusion but resting it entirely on the language of section 4(4)(d)(i) of the Central Excises & Salt Act) (1) There is ample internal indication in the statute to show that the cost of packing referred to in section 4(4)(d)(i) of the Central Excises & Salt Act, 1944 is the cost of packing incurred by the manufacturer and recovered by him from the purchaser whether as part of the said price or separately.\n[994D] (2) While generally the normal price for which the goods are sold at the factory gate is to be taken as assessable value, an addition thereto has to be made where, in addition to the price, the manufacturer levies a charge for the packing which is intrinsically and inevitably incidental to placing the manufactured goods on the market.\n[994F] (3) The answer to the question whether the cost of the container should be included in the assessable value or not would depend upon whether the goods in question are supplied in a packed condition or not.\nIf the answer is yes, three kinds of situation may arise.\nWhere the manufacturer sup plies his own container or drum but does not charge the customer therefore, then the price of the goods will also include the cost of the ' container.\nThere will be no ques tion of separate addition to the sale price nor can the assessee claim a deduction of the cost of packing from the sale price except where the container is a durable one 978 and is returnable to the manufacturer.\nIf the manufacturer supplies the drums and charges the customer separately therefore, then, under section 4(4)(d)(i), the cost of the drums to the buyer has to be added to the price except where the packing is of durable nature and is to be returned to the manufacturer.\nIf on the other hand, the manufacturer asks the customer to bring his own container and does not charge anything therefore then the cost (or value) of the packing cannot be \"notionally\" added to, or subtracted from, the price at which the goods have been sold by the manufac turer.\n[995B D] Per J.S. Verma, J. (agreeing with Ranganathan, J. that the conclusion reached on the language of section 4(4)(d)(i) of the Act is sufficient to allow these appeals).\n(1) The cost of packing envisaged in section 4(4)(d)(i) of the Act for determining the \"value\" in relation to any excisable goods is only the \"cost of such packing\" incurred by the manufacturer and recovered from the buyer except where the packing is of a durable nature and is returnable by the buyer to the manufacturer.\n[995G] (2) The \"cost of such packing\" referred to in section 4(4)(d)(i) does not include within its ambit the cost of packing not incurred by the manufacturer when the packing is supplied by the buyer and not the manufacturer.\n[995H]", + "6413": "The appellant was an Accountant cum Headclerk in the Forest Training School, PW 3 the Principal of the training school, and PW I the canteen contractor.\nThe prosecution alleged that on the basis of a complaint made by the appel lant that the food served in the canteen was substandard, PW 3 issued a show cause notice to PW I, as to why the licence for the canteen should not be cancelled and that thereafter the appellant sent for PW I and demanded a bribe of Rs. I00.\nAs the appellant pressed the demand from PW 1, the latter made a complaint to PW 6, the inspector, who arranged a trap.\nThe trap was arranged.\nPW I handed over the money to the appellant, who received the same.\nPW 6 conducted the phe nolphthalein test with reference to the fingers of the appellant.\nThe test was positive.\nThe currency notes were seized, and the appellant arrested chargesheeted.\nThe Trial Judge accepted the prosecution evidence, rejected the pleas of the appellant that PW 1 had returned the amount of Rs. 100 due to him, that there had been no demand for a bribe as there had been no occasion for doing so, and recorded conviction.\nThe appellant appealed to the High Court and contended that there was no independent evidence regarding the demand, the messenger who had contacted PW 1 at the behest of the appellant had not been examined, the solitary evidence of PW I is insufficient and that the explanation offered by the appellant was probable and that there is no conclusive evidence to hold that the appellant was guilty.\nThe High Court took the view that the recovery of the currency notes from the appellant prove his guilty conduct, in view of the presumption arising under section 4(1) 01 ' the Prevention of Corruption Act and that the same has not been rebutted and held that though the conviction under 335 section 161 I.P.C. and section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 is to be maintained, no separate sen tence need be awarded under section 161 I.P.C. It, accord ingly, confirmed the conviction of the appellant and sen tenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 15 months.\nIn the appeal to this court, it was contended that the appellant had a consistent case even from the earliest opportunity, that the currency notes found in his possession was the money returned by PW I, and that the presumption, if any, arising under section 4 was rebutted, and the convic tion cannot therefore be sustained.\nDismissing the appeal, this Court HELD: 1.\nThe appellant has not even by preponderance of probability succeeded in rebutting the presumption under section 4(1) of the Prevention of Corruption Act.\n[338C] 2.\nThe Court has no choice once it is established that the accused person has received a sum of money which was not due to him as a legal remuneration, but to draw a presump tion that the person received the money as a motive of reward.\nHowever, it is open to that person to show that though that money was not due to him as legal remuneration, it was legally due to him in some other manner or that he received it under a transaction or an arrangement which was lawful.\nThe explanation offered by the person should be a true one and not one which is merely plausible.\n[339B C; F] Dhanvantrai Balwantrai Desai vs State of Maharashtra, AIR 1964 SC 575, referred to.", + "5471": "Sub section ( l ) of section 630 of the provides for launching of prosecution against an officer or employee of a company, who (a) wrongfully obtains possession of any property of a company, or (b) having any such property in his possession wrongfully withholds or knowingly misapplies the same.\nThe petitioner who was given a flat by the company for his residence during the period of his employment did not vacate it on his retirement.\nHe was granted six months time on humanitarian grounds upon his undertaking to comply with.\nUpon his failure to vacate the premises the company lodged a complaint against him under section 630 of the Act for wrongful withholding of its property.\nThe Magistrate took congnizance of the complaint and directed issue of process.\nDismissing the writ petition filed by him under article 227 of the Constitution read with section 482 Cr.\nP.C. seeking to quash the proceedings, the High Court following its consistent view in a series of cases that the term 'officer or employee ' in sub section\n(1) of section 630 must be interpreted to mean not only the present officer or employee of company but also to include past officers and employees of the company and that the words 'any such property ' in cl.\n(b) qualify the words 'any property of a company ' appearing in cl.\n(a), held that the case does not call for interference.\n169 In the special leave petition it was contended for the petitioner that the provision contained in section 630 of the Act is a penal provision and, therefore, must be subject to a strict construction and there is no room for intendment, that the term 'officer or employee ' occurring in sub section\n(1) of section 630 refers only to the existing officers and employees of a company, and not the past officers, and that cl.\n(b) of sub section\n(I) does not stand by itself but is interconnected with cl.\n(a) thereof and therefore cl.\n(a) and cl.\n(b) must be read together and when so read the words 'any such property ' in cl.\n(b) do not qualify the words 'any property of a company ' in cl.\n(a) and only relate to the property of company wrongfully taken possession of by a present officer.\nDismissing the special leave petition, ^ HELD: 1.\nSection 630 of the plainly makes it an offence if an officer or employee of the company who was permitted to use any property of the company during his employment, wrongfully retains or occupies the same after the termination of his employment.\n[176F G] 2.1 The term 'officer or employee ' of a company in section 630(1) applies not only to existing officers or employees but also to past officers or employees if such officer or employee either (a) wrongfully obtains possession of any property, or (b) having obtained such property during the course of his employment, withholds the same after the termination of his employment.\n[179B C] 2.2 The beneficent provision contained in section 630 of the though penal, has been purposely enacted by the legislature with the object of providing a summary procedure for retrieving the property of the company.\nIt is the duty of the Court to place a broad and liberal construction on the provision in furtherance of the object and purpose of the legislation which would suppress the mischief and advance the remedy.\n[175C E] 2.3 Sub section\n(1) of section 630 of the Act by clauses (a) and (b) creates two distinct and separate offences: (1) Where an officer or employee of a company wrongfully obtains possession of any property of the company during the course of his employment, to which he is not entitled.\nNormally, it is only the present officers and employees who can secure possession of any property of a company.\nIt is also possible for such an officer or employee after termination of his employment to wrongfully take away possession of any such property.\nThis is the function of cl.\n(a) 170 and although it primarily refers to the existing officers and employees, it may also take in past officers and employees.\n(2) Where an officer or employee of a company having any property of a company in his possession wrongfully withholds it or knowingly applies it to purposes other than those expressed or directed in the articles and authorized by the Act.\nIt may well be that an officer or employee may have lawfully obtained possession of any such property during the course of his employment but wrongfully withholds it after the termination of his employment.\nThat appears to be one of the functions of cl.\nClause (b) also makes it an offence if any officer or employee of a company having any property of the company in his possession knowingly applies it to purposes other than those expressed or directed in the articles and authorized by the Act.\nThat would primarily apply to the present officers and employees and may also include past officers and employees.\nThere is therefore no warrant to give a restrictive meaning to the term 'officer or employee ' appearing in sub section\n(1) of section 630 of the Act.\n[175F H; 176A C] 3.\nIt is quite evident that clauses (a) and (b) are separated by the word 'or ' and therefore are clearly disjunctive.\nThe whole object of enacting the provision is the preservation of the property of a company by the creation of two distinct offences by clauses (a) and.(b) which arise under different sets of circumstances, and it would be rendered nugatory by projecting cl.\n(a) into cl.\n1176C, D E] 4.\nAccording to the plain construction, the words 'any such property ' in cl.\n(b) relate to 'any property of a company ' as mentioned in cl.\nIt is wrongful with holding of such property meaning the property of the company after termination of the employment, which is an offence under section 630(l)(b) of the Act.\n[176F; 177E F] 5.\nThe petitioner given one month 's time to vacate the premises failing which the respondents to take such proceedings as the law provides.\nThe Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate to proceed with the trial and dispose it of expeditiously.\n[179D E] Harkishan Lakhimal Gidwani vs Achyat Kashinath Wagh & Anr., , and Govind T. Jagtiani vs Sirajuddin section Kazi & Anr., , approved.\nAmritlal Chum vs Devi Ranjan Jha & Anr., , overruled. 171", + "3442": "The principles of law for determination of the question whether an endowment is public or private are: (1) In a private trust, the beneficiaries are specific individuals who are ascertained or capable of being ascertained; in a private trust, they are the general public or a class thereof which is incapable of being ascertained.\n[526C] (2) The intention of the founder as to whether specified individuals or the general public or any specified portion thereof could have the right of worship.\n[526E] (3) When property is dedicated for the worship of a family idol, it is a private and not a public endowment.\nWhere the beneficiaries are not specified individuals, the endowment can only be regarded as public.\n[526 F] Devki Nandan vs Murlidhar. ; and State of Bihar & Ors.\nvs Smt.\nCharusila Dasi, [1959] Suppl.\nS.C.R. 601/613, referred to.\n(4) Proof of user by the public without interference would be cogent evidence that the dedication is in favour of the public.\n[527A] Narayan Bhagwantrao Gosavi Balajiwala vs Gopal Vinayak Gosavi and others; , , referred to.\n(5) It is unusual for rulers to make grants to a family idol.\n[527B] (6) Participation of the members of the public in the darshan in the temple and in the daily acts of worship or in the celebrations on festival occasions may be a very important factor to consider in determining the character of the temple.\n[527E] Tilkayat Shri Govindlalji Maharaj vs The State of Rajasthan and others, [1964] 1 S.C.R. 561.\nreferred to.\n(7) The origin of the temple, the manner in which its affairs are managed, the nature and extent of the gifts received by it, rights exercised by the devotees in regard to worship, the consciousness of the manager and the consciousness of the devotees as to the public character of the temple establish whether a temple is a public or a private temple.\n[527F] Goswami Shri Mahalaxmi Vahuji vs Rannchhoddas Kalidas and ors.\n; , referred to.\n(8) It is not always possible to have all the features of a public trust in a given case: even some of the tests may be sufficient to conclude about the character of the trust.\n[528E] Dismissing the appeal ^ HELD: In the instant case from the documentary and oral evidence the following features are present: (i) The deity installed in the temple was intended by the founder to be continually worshipped by an indeterminate multitude of the Hindu public.\n(ii) In order to facilitate worship by the public, the founder also intended that regular bhajan, kirtan and worship shall be maintained and annual ceremonies and processions for pilgrimage shall be conducted by the saints in succession nominated by the reigning saint.\n519 (iii) There has been no evidence of any hindrance or restriction in the matter of continuous worship by the public extending over a long period.\n(iv) More than a century ago the temple, in its own name, was the recipient of land by Royal grant and the same has been managed by the saints in succession as manager, not as personal or private property.\n(v) Gifts of land by members of the public from the Taluka and outside it in favour of the temple or of the Sansthan were made for the purpose of worship.\n(vi) Collection of subscriptions were made from house to house by taking Maharaj and also for 'Gulal ' ceremony.\n(vii) Holding out of the Sansthan to all intents and purposes as a public temple.\n(viii) Treating of the Sansthan by those who are connected with the management as intended for user by the public without restrictions.\n(ix) Absence of any evidence in the long history of the Sansthan to warrant that it had any appearance of, or that it was ever treated as, a private property.\n[530E H; 531A B] The above features lead to the inescapable conclusion that Shri Vithal Rukhamai Sansthan is a public trust within the meaning of section 2(13) of the Bombay Public Trust Act.", + "362": "The assesses carrying on business in the City of Bombay was assessed to income tax for the years 1943 44 to 1947 48 and 1951 52 by the Income tax Officer C 1 Ward Bombay.\nAs the assessee did not pay the income tax due the Income tax Officer issued in April 1951 to the Additional Collector of Bombay a recovery certificate under section 46(2) of the Indian Income tax Act, 1922.\nIn February 1954 the Additional Collector issued a notice of demand and as no payment was made he attached the good will and tenancy rights of the assessee 's premises by a warrant of attachment dated 24th March 1954, 888 A sale was held in February 1955.\nThe sale proceeds not being sufficient to satisfy the assessed tax the Additional Collector issued a notice under section 13 of the Bombay City Land Revenue Act, 1876 requiring the assessee to appear before him and show cause why he should not be apprehended and confined to civil prison in satisfaction of the said certified demand.\nIn default of assessee 's appearance and showing cause a warrant for his arrest was issued under section 13 of the Bombay Act, II of 1876 and he was actually arrested on 1st July 1955.\nAn application to the Bombay High Court under article 226 of the Constitution for a writ in the nature of a writ of habeas corpus having proved unsuccessful, an application under article 32 was filed in the Supreme Court for the same relief.\nTwo main points urged on behalf of the assessee were: (a) that section 46(2) of the Indian Income tax Act under which the Income tax Officer issued the recovery certificate to the Additional Collector of Bombay was void, under article 13 (1) of the Constitution in that it offended article 21 and article 14 of the Constitution; (b)that section 13 of the Bombay Land Revenue Act, 1876 (Bombay Act II of 1876) under which the warrant of arrest was issued by the Additional Collector was void under article 13(1) of the Constitution as the same was repugnant to article 14 of the Constitution.\nHeld (as regards a) (1) that there was no violation of fundamental rights under article 21 of the Constitution inasmuch as section 13 of the Bombay Act II of 1876 under which warrant of arrest was issued for the recovery of the demand certified under section 46(2) of the Indian Income tax Act constituted a procedure established by law.\nBoth section 13 of Bombay Act II of 1876 and section 46 of the Indian Income tax Act under which action had been taken against the assessee were not void and therefore no question of violation of funda mental rights under article 21 could arise at all) (ii)the contention that section 46(2) of the Indian Income tax Act provides for two different and alternative methods of recovery of the dues and clothes the Collector with the unfettered and unguided power to apply either of the two methods inasmuch as it enables the Collector at his will to discriminate between two defaulters who are similarly situated and thus violates the equal protection clause of the Constitution was without force because sub section (2) of section 46 does not prescribe two different procedures.\nThe proviso enacted therein does not indicate a different and alternative mode of recovery of the certified amount of tax but only confers additional powers on the Collector for the better and more effective application of the only mode of recovery authorised by the body of sub section (2) of section 46 and therefore there was no question of possibility of dis crimination at all; (iii)the further contention that section 46(2) of the Indian Incometax Act violates the equal protection clause of the Constitution and has thus become void under article 14 of the Constitution as section 46(2) required the Collector,on receipt of the requisite certificate from 889 the Income tax Officer, to recover the amount specified in the certificate as if it were an arrear of the land revenue and there are different laws adopted by different States for the recovery of land revenues and thus there is discrimination on the ground that defaulters are treated differently in different States is also without force be cause discrimination complained of is a permissible classification and does not offend the fundamental right guaranteed by article 14 as the grouping of the income tax defaulters in separate categories on classes State wise is a territorial classification which is based on an intelligible differentia and there is a reasonable nexus or co relation between the basis of classification and the object sought to be achieved by the Income tax Act.\nThe fact that the income tax demand is a Union public demand makes no difference in the legal position.\nHeld, (as regards b) that the contention that section 13 of the Bombay Act II of 1876 became unconstitutional under article 13(1) of the Constitution in that the procedure prescribed by section 13 of the Bombay Act II of 1876 in respect of a defaulter residing in the City of Bombay was harsher and more drastic than the procedure laid down in section 157 of the Bombay Act V of 1879 in respect of a defaulter residing outside the City of Bombay was without force because section 13 of the Bombay Act II of 1876 was amended on 8th October 1954 and a new law laid down a law similar to the law laid down by section 157 of the Bombay Act V of 1879 and thus the vice of unconstitutionality 'if any ' was removed.\nState of Punjab vs Ajaib Singh & Another ([1953] S.C.R. 254), Shaik Ali Ahmed vs Collector of Bombay (I.L.R. , Chiranjit Lal Chowdhury vs The Union of India ([1950] S.C.R. 869), Budhan Choudhry and others vs The State of Bihar ([1955] 1 S.C.R. 1045), Middleton vs Texas Power and Light Company ; , Bowman vs Lewis (101 U.S. 22; , The State of Rajasthan vs Rao Manohar Singhji ([1954] S.C.R. 996), Bhikaji Narayan Dhakras vs The State of Madhya Pradesh, Nagpur and Another ([1965] 2 S.C.R. 589) and Erimmal Ebrahim Hajee vs The Collector of Malabar ([1954] , referred to.", + "2035": "The respondent had under its control several docks.\nThe trustees Of the respondent introduced a two shift system of work and that resulted in the crew working in some docks getting 4 hours of overtime in some docks 3 hours of overtime and in others 2 hours of overtime only.\nIn the last category the 12 hours shift wag divided in to 8 hours of work, 2 hours of rest and 2 hours of overtime.\nThe 2 hours period of rest was variable depending on the tides or the exigencies of the work, though the crew were informed each day what the, period of rest would be on the following day.\nThe appellants, who belonged to this category, complained that the breakup of the 12 hours shift into 8 hours of duty, 2 hours of rest and 2 hours of overtime offended the , and that the system of variable recess did not satisfy the requirements of rest which is the basis for fixing statutorily the hours of work in relation to wages.\nThe Industrial Tribunal held that the appellants were not able to establish that the existing system of work needed any modification.\nIn appeal to this Court, HELD: There was no breach of the provision of the and the case of the appellants could not be compared with that of the crew working at the other docks, because, there wag no parallel in the work of the three different sets of crew.\n[643 H] If an employer takes actual work for 8 hours per day on 6 days in a week he complies with the relevant provisions of the Act and the Rules, namely sections 13 and 14 of the Act and rr.\n24 and 25 of the Minimum Wages (Central) Rules 1950, and need not pay overtime.\nHe may go up to 9 hours on any day without paying any overtime provided he does not exceed 48 hours in the week.\nHe can specify the intervals of rest and spread the 8 or 9 hours, as the case may be, together with intervals of rest over 12 hours in a twelve hour shift.\nThese periods of rest must not be periods during which the workman is on duty and inaction is due to want of work for him, but they must be predetermined periods of inaction during which the workman is neither called upon nor expected to display physical activity or sustained attention.[641 B D] In the present cage the total number of hours of work in a week was 48 (8 hours per day for 6 days).\nTherefore overtime was payable beyond the period of 8 hours, for that hour or part of an hour during which the workman was either made to work or the interval of rest was not specified.\nThe respondent can say that it will not take more that two hours extra work on any day and specify the remaining two hours as the intervals for rest; and the Trustees would not be guilty of infraction of the Act by keeping the recess variable so long as they specify 633 in advance the recess on any particular day.\nThe Trustees could not be compelled to break up the hours of work by interposing intervals for rest.\n[641 G H; 643 B C, D E]", + "5597": "The appellants are the tenants of the disputed property.\nRespondent plaintiff 's suit for eviction of the appellants was dismissed by the trial court.\nThe High Court in revision set aside the judgment and order of the trial court and decreed the suit for ejectment of the tenants appellants.\nThe tenants appealed to this Court.\nDismissing the appeal, the Court, HELD: Under the provisions of sub section (2) of Section 2 of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, newly constructed buildings stand exempted from the operation of the Act for a period of ten years, which has to be computed from a date to be determined in the manner indicated in Explanation I to section 2(2), which in this case is the date on which first assessment of the premises in dispute was made for house tax by the Nagar Palika, i.e. October 1, 1976.\nProvisions of Sections 39 and 40 are of no avail to the appellants as the suit for their eviction was not pending on July 15, 1972, when the Act came into force; the suit being filed much later after coming into force of the Act.\nProvisions of the Act are not applicable to the appellants ' case and the protection thereunder granted to the tenants is not available to them.\n[166G H; 164C, F] In view of the fact that the appellants had been carrying on business in the premises in question for a long time, the decree for eviction directed not to be executed till March 31, 1988, subject to the appellants ' filing usual undertaking (within four weeks).\n[167C D] Om Prakash Gupta, etc.\nvs Dig Vijendrapal Gupta, etc., [19821 3 S.C.R. 491 and Vineet Kumar vs Mangal Sain Wadhera, [1985] A.l.\nR. S.C. 817, relied upon by the appellants.\n159 Firm Amar Nath Basheshar Das vs Tek Chand, [19721 3 S.C.R. 922, relied upon by the respondent.", + "2256": "In June 1948 the appellant instituted a suit against the first respondent and others for their ejectment from the property in suit, On February 28, 1949 the Calcutta Thika Tenancy Act came into force.\nThe first respondent was not a thika tenant within the definition therefore of given in the Act.\nThe suit was decreed by the Munsif in March 1949.\nIn November 1949 the appeal filed by the first respondent was ,dismissed by the first appellate court.\nHe then filed a second ,,appeal in the High Court which was heard in 1954.\nBefore that the Calcutta Thika Tenancy (Amendment) Act, 1953 was passed.\nUnder this Act the first respondent came within the definition of thika tenant.\nThe High Court remanded the case to the Subordinate Judge for trying the case in the light of the amended Act.\nThe Subordinate Judge held that the first respondent was a thika tenant and could not be ejected as none of the grounds mentioned in section 3 of the Act had been established by the appellant.\nThe latter appealed to the High Court and urged that with the omission of section 29 in the 1953 Act Civil Courts became, unable to remit ejectment suits to the Rent Controller with the result that the Act as amended could not apply to pre Act suits.\nThe High Court however took the view that after the omission of sections 28 and 29 from the Act suits for eviction before civil courts became infructuous and, accordingly, dismissed the appeal.\nThe appellant with certificate came to this Court.\nThe questions that fell for consideration were: (i) whether the tenant could take the benefit of section 3 in a pre Act suit, (ii) whether in view of the omission of sections 28 and 29 from the Act the civil courts had jurisdiction to try such a suit.\nHELD:Per Wanchoo C.J. & Mitter J. (i) While it is a general principle of law that statutes are not to operate retrospectively so as to defeat vested interests; such operation may be given by express enactment or by necessary implication from the language employed.\nThe language of section 3 leaves no room for doubt that it is retrospective since it expressly states that notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force or in any contract, a thika tenant will be liable to ejectment on grounds specified therein and not otherwise.\n[179 D E; 180 F G].\nKnight vs Lee, and Beadling vs Goll, 39 Times Law Reporter 31, referred to.\nSection 3 does not purport to lay down that the grounds mentioned therein have got to be stated in the notice of ejectment.\nAll that the section lays down is that ejectment could not be had unless the ,existence of one of the grounds was proved.\nSuch proof could have been adduced at the trial even if no mention of the grounds had been made before.\nThe appellant not having given such proof the case was rightly decided against him.\n[183 C D].\n171 (ii) However In a pre Act suit no notice under section 4 could be insisted on as that section , clearly prospective.\nSection 5 which required proceedings to be filed before the Controller was also clearly prospective.\n[180 H; 181 A; B H].\n(iii) The High Court was wrong in holding, that suits for the eviction of thika tenants became infructious before civil courts after the omission of sections 28 and 29.\nThere being no longer any provision for transfer of pending suits and appeals, the court hearing the appeal would have to pass a decree for ejectment even if the defendant was a thika tenant after taking into account section 3.\n[183 D F].\nPer Bhargava, J. This appeal must be dismissed because the respondent was entitled to the benefit of section 3.\nIt was not necessary to express any opinion whether compliance With section 4 was also required or whether it being prospective only no such compliance by the appellant was needed.\n[184 B].", + "5861": "Prior to 1955, the Bench Secretaries in the Allahabad High Court were on a higher pay scale than that of the Section Officers.\nIn 1965, the State Government appointed a Pay Rationalisation Committee to consider the duties and responsibilities of different categories of posts and recommend changes.\nThe Committee recommended for the Bench Secretaries a pay scale lower than that of the Section Officers.\nThe Bench Secretaries made a representation to the Government that they be put at par with the Section Officers if not on a higher scale.\nThe Government appointed Pay Commission (l971 72).\nThe Pay Commission did not accept the claim of the Bench Secretaries.\nThe Bench Secretaries again moved the Government reiterating their demand, whereupon an \"Anomalies Committee\" was constituted.\nThe Committee rejected the claim of the Bench Secretaries for placing them at par with the Section Officers, but suggested that ten posts of Bench Secretaries be upgraded.\nThe Government accepted the recommendation and issued orders upgrading ten posts of Bench Secretaries to be called Bench Secretaries grade I, giving the nomenclature of Bench Secretaries grade Il to the rest of Secretaries.\nThe Bench Secretaries grade II moved the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution, challenging the bifurcation of their cadre into grade I & grade 11.\nThe High Court quashed the notification which created Bench Secretaries grade 1.\nThe State of l, '.P., aggrieved by the decision of the High Court, appealed to this Court.\nPG NO 288 PG NO 289 Two questions arose for consideration (i) whether the Bench Secretaries were entitled to pay scales admissible to Section officers, and (11) whether the creation of two grades with different pay scales in the cadre of Bench Secretaries doing the same or similar work was violative of the \"equal pay for equal work\".\nAllowing the appeal, the Court, HELD:(I) It requires of duties and responsibilities of the respective posts.\nFunctions of two posts may appear to be the same or similar, but there may be a difference in the performance.\nQuantity of work may be the same but quality may be different.\nThe equation of posts of equation of pay must be determined by expert bodies, like pay commissions.\nIf there is any determination by a Commission or Committee, the Court should normally accept it and not tinker with it unless it is shown to be made with extraneous consideration.\n[298G H;299A B] The Bench Secretaries were paid more emoluments than the section Officers, but it was not known on what basis and how they were treated superior to Section Officers.\nThe Successive Pay Commission and the Pay Rationalisation Committee found no support to their superior claim.\nThe Court could not go against that opinion.\nThe Bench Secretaries could as of right the pay scale admissible to the Section Officers.\n[299C D] (2) The second question formulated affected the civil services in general.\nAll the Bench Secretaries concerned were indisputably having the same duties.\nThey had been bifurcated into two grades with different pay scales grade I with higher pay scale and grade II which was said to offend the constitutional principle of \"equal pay for equal work\".\n[299E G] Article 39(d) of the Constitution, which proclaims \"equal pay for equal work\" and other like provisions in the Directive Principles, are rooted in Social Justice, intended to bring about a socio economic trans formation in society.\nIn matters of employment, it must be ensured that there is no exploitation of the poor and ignorant.\nIt is the duty of the State to see that the under privileged or weaker section get their dues.\nAgainst this background the principle of \"equal pay for equal work\" has to be construed.\nThis principle has no mechanical application in every ca8e of similar work.\nIt has to be read into Article 14 of the Constitution, which permits reasonable classification founded on different basis.\n[303C E] PG NO 290 The classification can be based on some qualities or characteristics of persons grouped together and not in others left out.\nThose qualities or characteristics must have a reasonable relation to the object to be achieved.\nIn service matters, merit or experience could be the proper basis for classification to promote efficiency.\nIt cannot be denied that the quality of work performed by persons of longer experience is Superior to the work of new comers.\nHigher pay scale to avoid stagnation or resultant frustration for lack of promotional evenues is common in career service.\nEntitlement to higher pay scales depends upon seniority cum merit or merit cum seniority.\nThe differentiation so made in the same cadre will not amount to discrimination.\nClassification based on experience is a reasonable classification having a rational nexus with the object thereof.\nTo hold otherwise, would be detrimental to the interest of the Service itself.\n[303F H; 304A B] The Bench Secretaries might do the same work, but their quality of work might differ.\nThe Rule framed by the Chief Justice of the High Court make a proper classification for the purpose of entitlement to higher pay scale.\nThe High Court overlooked the criterion provided under the Rules.\nMerit governs the grant of higher pay scale.\nClassification made under the Rules could not be said to be violative of the right to have equal pay for equal work.\n[305A C] Randhir Singh vs Union of India & Ors.\n, ; ;Ram Chandra vs Union of lndia; , ; P. Savita vs Union of India, [1985] Suppl.\n(1) SCR 101; Dhirendra Chamoli & Anr.\nvs State of U.P., ; Surinder Singh vs Engineer in Chief, CPWD, ; R.D. Gupta & Ors.\nvs Lt. Governor of Delhi, ; ; Bhagwan Das & Ors.\nvs State of Haryana, [1987] 4 SCC 634; National Museum Non Gazetted Employees Association & Anr.\nvs Union of India, (WP No. 1230 of 1987 disposed of by the Supreme Court on 10.2.1988); Jaipal & Ors.\nvs State of Haryana, (WP No. 455 and connected petitions of 1987 disposed of by the Supreme Court on 2.6.1988); Y.K. Mehta vs Union of India, (W P No. 1239 of 1979 and connected petitions disposed of bay supreme Court on 26.8.1988); Keshavananda Bharati vs State of Kerala, [1973] 4 SCC 225 at para 712; All India Customs and Central Excise Stenographers (Recognised) and Others vs Union of India & Ors., [1988] (2) Judgments Today SC p. 519, referred to.", + "4480": "The Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 by section 127 (1) (i) empowered a municipal council to impose, in the whole or any part of the municipality, \"a tax payable by the owners of houses, buildings or lands situated within the limits of Municipality with reference to annual letting value of the house, building or land called property tax\".\nThe corresponding provision in the Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956 was section 132(1)(a), and it provided that \"the Corporation shall impose a tax payable by the owners of buildings or lands situated within the city with reference to the gross annual letting value of the building or land called the property tax\".\nThe procedure for imposition of taxes was spelt out in section 129 of the Municipalities Act and section 133 of the Municipal Corporation Act.\nSection 127A was inserted in the Municipalities Act for imposition of property tax and provided by sub clause (1) that as and from the financial year 1976 77 there shall be charged, levied and paid for each financial year a tax on the lands or buildings or both situated in a municipality at specified rates.\nSub clause (2) exempted properties owned by or vesting in the Union Government, State Government or the Council from the levy.\nSimilar 2 provisions were inserted in sections 135 and 136 of the Municipal Corporation Act.\nRespondent No. 1 was constituted the Special Area Development Authority under section 65 of the Madhya Pradesh Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam (23 of 1973).\nClauses (c) and (d) of section 69 of the Act conferred upon the Development Authority powers for the purpose of municipal administration and for the purpose of taxation.\nThese clauses were inserted by Ordinance 26 of 1975 which came into force on February 27, 1976.\nThe Ordinance was replaced by the Madhya Pradesh Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh (Sanshodhan) Adhiniyam 1976 (6 of 1976).\nOn June 24, 1976 respondent 1 entered into an agreement with the appellant company under which the company agreed to contribute a sum of rupees 3 lakhs annually to the \"seed capital\" of the Authority in consideration of the Authority agreeing not to exercise its power of taxation or of levying any other charges on the assets and activities of the company.\nThe agreement was to remain in force for a period of ten years beginning from the calendar year 1976 and the annual payments due from 1977 were to be made in January every year.\nThe appellant company paid the contribution for the year 1976.\nIn the same year the company was called upon by the Sales Tax authorities to pay \"the tax on the entry of goods\" which was introduced by the Madhya Pradesh Sthaniya Kshetra Me Mal Ke Pravesh Par Kar Adhyadesh 1976 in substitution of octroi tax.\nWhile the company was pursuing that matter with the State Government, contending that it was not liable to pay the entry tax by reason of the agreement, on January 4, 1977 respondent 1 made a further demand of Rs. 3 lakhs on the company for contribution for the year 1977.\nThat amount not having been paid as provided in the agreement, respondent 1 terminated the agreement by its letter dated February 4, 1977.\nBy a notice issued under section 65 of the Madhya Pradesh Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam 'Act of 1973 ' on February 21, 1977 and by another notice issued under section 164(3) of the Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act 1961 on April 15, 1977, the Chief Executive Officer of respondent 1 called upon the company to pay a sum of about Rs. 13 lakhs by way of property tax for the year 1976 77.\nOn July 16, 1977 the company was called upon to pay a further sum of about Rs. 13 lakhs as property tax for the year 1977 78.\nThe company disputed its liability to pay on the ground that no tax was leviable on its property since the company was owned wholly by the Government of India and that respondent 1 was estopped from levying the property tax by reason of the agreement of 1976.\nHaving failed to pursuade respondent 1 to accept its point of view, and also having failed in the High Court the appellant company came to this Court in appeal.\nIn the appeals to this Court it was contended: (1) that respondent 1 can exercise only such powers to levy property tax as the Municipal Corporation or the Municipal Council had under the Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956 or the Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 as these Acts stood on February 27, 1976, when clause (d) was inserted in section 69 of the Act of 1973.\nSection 127A and section 135 which create and levy the charge of property 3 tax having been inserted in the Municipalities Act and the Municipal Corporation Act respectively with effect from April 1, 1976 i.e. subsequent to the insertion of clause (d) in section 69 of the Act of 1973, Respondent 1 was incompetent to exercise the powers of the Municipality or the Municipal Corporation under section 127A of the Municipal Corporation Act or section 136 of the Municipal Corporation Act; (2) that respondent 1 cannot impose the property tax without following the procedure prescribed by section 129 of the Municipalities Act and section 133 of the Municipal Corporation Act; (3) that Article 285(1) of the Constitution envisages that the property of the Union shall save in so far as Parliament may by law otherwise provide be exempt from all taxes imposed by a State or by any authority within a State.\nSection 127A(2) of the Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act and section 136 of the Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act also provide that the property tax shall not be leviable, on \"buildings and lands owned by or vesting in the Union Government\".\nThe appellant companies being wholly owned by the Government of India, the lands and buildings owned by the companies cannot be subjected to property tax; (4) that the lands having been taken on lease for a period of 30 years by the appellant companies, it is the State Government and not the appellant companies who can be called upon to pay the tax; and (5) that Parliament enacted the Coal Mines Nationalisation Act, 1973 for acquisition of coal mines and utilisation of coal resources to subserve the common good.\nThe lands and buildings on which respondent 1 had imposed the property tax are used for the purposes of and are covered by coal mines.\nThe taxing power of the State legislature comes in conflict with the power and function of the Union to regulate and develop the mines as envisaged by the Nationalisation Act, and is an impediment since it substantially increased the cost of the developmental activities.\nDismissing the appeals, ^ HELD: (i) Section 69(d) of the Act of 1973 must be read to mean that respondent 1 shall have all the powers of taxation which a Municipal Corporation or a Municipal Council has at the time when respondent 1 seeks to exercise those powers.\n[14 A] (ii) The Act of 1973 does not provide for any independent power of taxation or any machinery of its own for exercising the power of taxation.\nIt rests content by referring to the provisions contained in the two Municipal Acts.\nThe three Acts are supplemental, from which it must follow that amendments made to the earlier Acts after the enactment of section 69(d) shall have to be read into that section.\nWithout recourse to such a construction the power of taxation conferred by that section will become ineffectual.\n[14 B C] (iii) A reading of the reference to the two earlier Municipal Acts as a reference to those Acts as they stand at the time when the power of taxation is sought to be exercised by respondent 1 will not cause repugnancy between the two earlier Acts on one hand and the Act of 1973 on the other, nor will it cause any confusion in the practical application of the earlier Acts, because the Act of 1973 does not contain any independent provision or machinery for exercising the power of taxation.\n[14 D] 4 (iv) If an earlier legislation is incorporated into a later legislation, the provisions of earlier law which are incorporated into the later law become a part and parcel of the later law.\nTherefore, amendments made in the earlier law after the date of incorporation cannot by their own force, be read into the later law.\nThat is because the legislature, cannot be assumed to intend to bind itself to all future amendments or modifications which may be made in the earlier law.\n[12 D E] (v) Where a statute is incorporated by reference into a second statute, the repeal of the first statute by a third does not affect the second.\nLikewise, where certain provisions from an existing Act have been incorporated into a subsequent Act, no addition to the former Act, which is not expressly made applicable to the subsequent Act, can be deemed to be incorporated in it.\n[12G 13A] (vi) The broad principle that where a subsequent Act incorporates provisions of a previous Act then the borrowed provisions become an integral and independent part of the subsequent Act and are totally unaffected by any repeal or amendment in the previous Act, is subject to four exceptions, one of which is that the principle will not apply to cases \"where the subsequent Act and the previous Act are supplemental to each other\".\n[13 D] Secretary of State for India in Council vs Hindustan Co operative Insurance Society, Limited, 58 Indian Appeals, 259, Clarke vs Bradlaugh, 69; Collector of Customs, Madras vs Nathella Samathu Chetty & Anr., ; and State of Madhya Pradesh vs M.V. Narasimhan, ; , referred to.\nIn the instant case, subsequent amendments made to the Municipal Corporation Act and the Municipalities Act will also apply to the power of taxation provided for in section 69(d) of the Act of 1973.\nThe Act of 1973 did not by section 69(d), incorporate in its true signification any particular provision of the two earlier Acts.\nIt provided that, for the purpose of taxation, the Special Area Development Authority shall have the powers which a Municipal Corporation or a Municipal Council has under the Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956 or the Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961.\nThe case, therefore, is not one of incorporation but of mere reference to the powers conferred by the earlier Acts.\n[13 E F] 2(i) Section 127A of the Municipalities Act and section 135 of the Municipal Corporation Act create by their own force, the liability to be brought to property tax and the right to levy that tax.\nNothing further is required to be done by the Municipality or the Municipal Corporation in order to impose the property tax.\nThe procedure preliminary to the imposition of other taxes which is prescribed by sections 129 and 133 of the two Acts, can have no application to the imposition of the property tax.\n[14 F 15 A] (ii) The property tax is imposed by respondent 1 under section 127A of the Municipalities Act and section 135 of the Municipal Corporation Act.\nIt is not imposed under section 127 of the former Act or section 132 of the latter Act.\nIt is, therefore, not necessary to follow the procedure prescribed by sections 129 and 133 of the respective Acts.\n[15 B C] 5 3.\nEven though the entire share capital of the appellant companies has been subscribed by the Government of India, it cannot be predicated that the companies themselves are owned by the Government of India.\nThe companies, which are incorporated under the Companies Act, have a corporate personality of their own, distinct from that of the Government of India.\nThe lands and buildings, are vested in and owned by the companies; the Government of India only owns the share capital.\n[16 A B] Rustom Cavasjee Cooper vs Union of India, ; , 555, Heavy Engineering Mazdoor Union vs The State of Bihar, , Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation vs The Income tax Officer & Anr. ; & Tamlin vs Hansaford referred to. 4.\nThe Explanation to section 147 of the Municipalities Act says that the property tax has to be paid by the owner of the land or building and that a tenant of land or building or both, who holds the same under a lease for an agreed period, shall be deemed to be the owner thereof.\nSection 141(1) of the Municipal Corporation Act provides that the property tax shall be paid primarily by the owner.\nBy sub section (2) of section 141, the property tax levied on the owner can also be recovered from the occupier of the land or the building.[18D E] 5(i) The power conferred by the State Legislature on Special Area Development Authorities to impose the property tax on lands and buildings is not in conflict with the power conferred by the Coal Mines Nationalisation Act on the Union Government to regulate and develop coal mines so as to ensure rational and scientific utilisation of coal resources.\n[21 G] (ii) The paramount purpose behind the declaration contained in section 2 of the is not in any manner defeated by the legitimate exercise of taxing power under section 69(d) of the Act of 1973.\n[21 H 22A] H.R.S. Murthy vs Collector of Chitoor and Another, ; , State of Haryana & Anr.\nvs Chanan Mal ; and The Ishwari Khetan Sugar Mills (P) Ltd. vs The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. ; referred to.\nBaijnath Kedia vs State of Bihar & Ors.\n[1970] 2 S.C.R. 100, distinguished.", + "784": "The principal question for determination in these appeals, arising out of writ petitions filed in the High Court, related to the validity of an order passed by the Board of Revenue (Andhra) terminating the appellant 's lease in respect of certain state quarries situated in the Venkatagiri Estate, which had been notified under section 3 of the Madras Estate (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1948 (Mad. XXVI Of I948), under the second proviso to section 20(1) of the Act, on the finding that the said lease was granted subsequent to July I, 1945, and was for a period exceeding one year, without giving the appellant three months ' notice under the third proviso to that section or providing for compensation under sub section\n(2) thereof.\nThe appellant had also claimed renewal of.\n, the lease under r. 47 Of the Mineral Concession Rules, 1949, which was rejected by the Board as well as by the High Court.\nThe contention on behalf of the appellant, in substance, was that the words \"such right\" in the third proviso to section 20(1) referred to the right mentioned in the second proviso, namely, the right created on or after July 1, 1945, and thus made applicable to it the provision of sub section\n(2)of the section, and before such right could be terminated the provisions of the third proviso relating to notice and sub section\n(2) as to compensation had to be complied with.\nHeld, that the contention raised on behalf of the appellant was without substance and must be negatived.\nThe scheme of the Act was to render all rights created after July 1, 1945, and for a period exceeding one year, ineffective and section 20, properly construed, made it amply clear that its second proviso was a self contained provision that rendered such rights void against the Government and, even if they were voidable and not void, the aid of the third proviso was wholly uncalled for.\nThe third proviso must be held to refer solely to termination of rights created before July i, 1945.\nA. M. section section V. M. & Co. vs The State of Madras, I.L.R. , referred to.\n553 The rule framed by the Madras Governor in exercise of the powers conferred on him by section 67(6) and (2) of the Act could not attract the operation of the third proviso nor could it change the true meaning Of section 20 Of the Act.\nHeld, further, that r. 47 Of the Mineral Concession Rules, 1949, which could at best insert a few terms in the lease, could not apply to a case, such as the present one, where the lease itself stood determined under the second proviso Of section 20 of the Act and its terms fell with it." + }, + "lmt": { + "ip": { + "A9/BN": "\u0986\u09aa\u09a8\u09bf \u099f\u09cd\u09b0\u09c7\u09a1\u09ae\u09be\u09b0\u09cd\u0995\u09c7\u09b0 \u09aa\u09be\u09b6\u09c7 \u09aa\u09cd\u09b0\u09a4\u09c0\u0995\u099f\u09bf \u09ac\u09cd\u09af\u09ac\u09b9\u09be\u09b0 \u0995\u09b0\u09a4\u09c7 \u09aa\u09be\u09b0\u09c7\u09a8, \u09af\u09be \u0986\u09aa\u09a8\u09bf \u09ac\u09cd\u09af\u09ac\u09b9\u09be\u09b0 \u09b6\u09c1\u09b0\u09c1 \u0995\u09b0\u09c7\u099b\u09c7\u09a8, \u09a4\u09ac\u09c7 \u098f\u0996\u09a8\u0993 \u09a8\u09bf\u09ac\u09a8\u09cd\u09a7\u09ad\u09c1\u0995\u09cd\u09a4 \u09b9\u09af\u09bc\u09a8\u09bf \u0964 \u098f\u099f\u09bf \u098f\u0995\u099f\u09bf \u09a8\u09cb\u099f\u09bf\u09b6 \u09b9\u09bf\u09b8\u09be\u09ac\u09c7 \u09aa\u09b0\u09bf\u09ac\u09c7\u09b6\u09a8 \u0995\u09b0\u09ac\u09c7\u09a8 \u09af\u09c7 \u0986\u09aa\u09a8\u09bf \u09ac\u09bf\u09b6\u09c7\u09b7 \"\u099a\u09bf\u09b9\u09cd\u09a8\" \u098f\u09b0 \u0985\u09a7\u09bf\u0995\u09be\u09b0 \u09a6\u09be\u09ac\u09bf \u0995\u09b0\u09c7\u099b\u09c7\u09a8 \u098f\u09ac\u0982 \u098f\u09b0 \u09a8\u09bf\u09ac\u09a8\u09cd\u09a7\u09a8 \u09ae\u09c1\u09b2\u09a4\u09c1\u09ac\u09bf \u09b0\u09af\u09bc\u09c7\u099b\u09c7\u0964 \u09aa\u09cd\u09b0\u09a4\u09c0\u0995\u099f\u09bf \u09a8\u09bf\u09b0\u09cd\u09a6\u09bf\u09b7\u09cd\u099f \u099f\u09cd\u09b0\u09c7\u09a1\u09ae\u09be\u09b0\u09cd\u0995 \u09ac\u09be \u09aa\u09b0\u09bf\u09b7\u09c7\u09ac\u09be \u099a\u09bf\u09b9\u09cd\u09a8 \u09a8\u09bf\u09ac\u09a8\u09cd\u09a7\u09bf\u09a4 \u09b9\u09af\u09bc\u09c7\u099b\u09c7 \u09a4\u09be \u09ac\u09cb\u099d\u09be\u09a4\u09c7 \u09ac\u09cd\u09af\u09ac\u09b9\u09be\u09b0 \u0995\u09b0\u09be \u09af\u09c7\u09a4\u09c7 \u09aa\u09be\u09b0\u09c7\u0964 \u09b8\u09c1\u09a4\u09b0\u09be\u0982, \u0986\u09aa\u09a8\u09be\u09b0 \u09b8\u09c7\u0987 \u099f\u09cd\u09b0\u09c7\u09a1\u09ae\u09be\u09b0\u09cd\u0995 \u09ac\u09be \u09aa\u09b0\u09bf\u09b7\u09c7\u09ac\u09be \u099a\u09bf\u09b9\u09cd\u09a8\u099f\u09bf \u09ac\u09cd\u09af\u09ac\u09b9\u09be\u09b0\u09c7\u09b0 \u098f\u0995\u0995 \u0985\u09a7\u09bf\u0995\u09be\u09b0 \u09b0\u09af\u09bc\u09c7\u099b\u09c7\u0964", + "A7/BN": "\u0986\u09aa\u09a8\u09bf \u09b2\u09bf\u0996\u09bf\u09a4\u09ad\u09be\u09ac\u09c7 \u0986\u09ac\u09c7\u09a6\u09a8 \u0995\u09b0\u09c7 \u099f\u09cd\u09b0\u09c7\u09a1\u09ae\u09be\u09b0\u09cd\u0995\u09c7\u09b0 \u09a8\u09bf\u09ac\u09a8\u09cd\u09a7\u09a8\u09c7\u09b0 \u099c\u09a8\u09cd\u09af \u09ab\u09be\u0987\u09b2 \u0995\u09b0\u09a4\u09c7 \u09aa\u09be\u09b0\u09c7\u09a8\u0964 \u098f\u099f\u09bf \u0995\u09b0\u09be\u09b0 \u09ae\u09be\u09a7\u09cd\u09af\u09ae\u09c7 \u0986\u09aa\u09a8\u09bf \u09ac\u09b0\u09cd\u09a4 \u09ae\u09be\u09a8\u09c7 \u0986\u09aa\u09a8\u09be\u09b0 \u09a6\u09cd\u09ac\u09be\u09b0\u09be \u09ac\u09cd\u09af\u09ac\u09b9\u09c3\u09a4 \u099f\u09cd\u09b0\u09c7\u09a1\u09ae\u09be\u09b0\u09cd\u0995\u09c7\u09b0 \u09ae\u09be\u09b2\u09bf\u0995 \u09ac\u09be \u09ad\u09ac\u09bf\u09b7\u09cd\u09af\u09a4\u09c7 \u0986\u09aa\u09a8\u09bf \u09af\u09be \u09ac\u09cd\u09af\u09ac\u09b9\u09be\u09b0 \u0995\u09b0\u09be\u09b0 \u0987\u099a\u09cd\u099b\u09be \u0995\u09b0\u099b\u09c7\u09a8 \u09a4\u09be \u09a6\u09be\u09ac\u09bf \u099c\u09be\u09a8\u09be\u099a\u09cd\u099b\u09c7\u09a8\u0964 \u0986\u09ac\u09c7\u09a6\u09a8\u099f\u09bf \u0995\u09cb\u09a8\u0993 \u09ac\u09cd\u09af\u0995\u09cd\u09a4\u09bf, \u09ab\u09be\u09b0\u09cd\u09ae, \u099f\u09cd\u09b0\u09be\u09b8\u09cd\u099f \u09ac\u09be \u0995\u09cb\u09a8\u0993 \u09b8\u0982\u09b8\u09cd\u09a5\u09be\u09b0 \u0985\u0982\u09b6\u09c0\u09a6\u09be\u09b0\u09c7\u09b0 \u09a8\u09be\u09ae\u09c7 \u0995\u09b0\u09be \u09af\u09c7\u09a4\u09c7 \u09aa\u09be\u09b0\u09c7\u0964", + "A14/BN": "\u098f\u0995\u099f\u09bf \u099f\u09cd\u09b0\u09c7\u09a1\u09ae\u09be\u09b0\u09cd\u0995 \u09a8\u09bf\u09ac\u09a8\u09cd\u09a7\u09a8\u09c7\u09b0 \u09a4\u09be\u09b0\u09bf\u0996 \u09a5\u09c7\u0995\u09c7 \u09e7\u09e6 \u09ac\u099b\u09b0 \u09aa\u09b0\u09cd\u09af\u09a8\u09cd\u09a4 \u09ac\u09c8\u09a7 \u09a5\u09be\u0995\u09c7\u0964 \u098f\u0995\u099c\u09a8\u0995\u09c7 \u09aa\u09cd\u09b0\u09a6\u09a4\u09cd\u09a4 \u09e7\u09e6 \u09ac\u099b\u09b0\u09c7\u09b0 \u09ae\u09a7\u09cd\u09af\u09c7 \u099f\u09cd\u09b0\u09c7\u09a1\u09ae\u09be\u09b0\u09cd\u0995 \u09aa\u09c1\u09a8\u09b0\u09cd\u09a8\u09ac\u09c0\u0995\u09b0\u09a3\u09c7\u09b0 \u099c\u09a8\u09cd\u09af \u09ab\u09be\u0987\u09b2 \u0995\u09b0\u09be\u09b0 \u09aa\u09b0\u09be\u09ae\u09b0\u09cd\u09b6 \u09a6\u09c7\u0993\u09af\u09bc\u09be \u09b9\u099a\u09cd\u099b\u09c7\u0964 \u098f\u0995\u099f\u09bf \u099f\u09cd\u09b0\u09c7\u09a1\u09ae\u09be\u09b0\u09cd\u0995 \u099a\u09bf\u09b0\u09b8\u09cd\u09a5\u09be\u09af\u09bc\u09c0\u09ad\u09be\u09ac\u09c7 \u09ac\u09bf\u09a6\u09cd\u09af\u09ae\u09be\u09a8 \u09a5\u09be\u0995\u09a4\u09c7 \u09aa\u09be\u09b0\u09c7 \u09af\u09a4\u09a6\u09bf\u09a8 \u098f\u099f\u09bf \u09af\u09a5\u09be\u09af\u09a5\u09ad\u09be\u09ac\u09c7 \u09aa\u09c1\u09a8\u09b0\u09cd\u09a8\u09ac\u09c0\u0995\u09b0\u09a3 \u0995\u09b0\u09be \u09b9\u09af\u09bc\u0964 (\u099f\u09cd\u09b0\u09c7\u09a1 \u09ae\u09be\u09b0\u09cd\u0995 \u09b8 \u0986\u0987\u09a8, \u09e7\u09ef\u09ef\u09ef \u098f\u09b0 \u09a7\u09be\u09b0\u09be \u09e8\u09eb \u09a6\u09c7\u0996\u09c1\u09a8)\u0964", + "A30/BN": "\u09b8\u09be\u09a7\u09be\u09b0\u09a3\u09a4 \u09b2\u09c7\u0996\u0995 \u09ac\u09be \u0995\u09be\u099c\u09c7\u09b0 \u09b8\u09cd\u09b0\u09b7\u09cd\u099f\u09be\u0987 \u098f\u0995\u099f\u09bf \u0995\u09be\u099c\u09c7\u09b0 \u0995\u09aa\u09bf\u09b0\u09be\u0987\u099f\u09c7\u09b0 \u09ae\u09be\u09b2\u09bf\u0995\u0964 \u09af\u09a6\u09bf\u0993, \u098f\u0987 \u09a8\u09bf\u09af\u09bc\u09ae\u09c7\u09b0 \u0995\u09bf\u099b\u09c1 \u09ac\u09cd\u09af\u09a4\u09bf\u0995\u09cd\u09b0\u09ae \u09b0\u09af\u09bc\u09c7\u099b\u09c7 \u09af\u09be \u0986\u0987\u09a8\u09c7\u09b0 \u09a7\u09be\u09b0\u09be \u09e7\u09ed \u098f\u09b0 \u0985\u09a7\u09c0\u09a8\u09c7 \u09b8\u09b0\u09ac\u09b0\u09be\u09b9 \u0995\u09b0\u09be \u09b9\u09af\u09bc\u09c7\u099b\u09c7\u0964 \u098f\u0997\u09c1\u09b2\u09bf\u09b0 \u09ae\u09a7\u09cd\u09af\u09c7 \u098f\u0995\u099f\u09bf \u0985\u09a4\u09bf \u09b8\u09be\u09a7\u09be\u09b0\u09a3 \u09ac\u09cd\u09af\u09a4\u09bf\u0995\u09cd\u09b0\u09ae \u09b9\u09b2: \u09af\u0996\u09a8 \u0995\u09be\u099c\u099f\u09bf \u098f\u0995\u099f\u09bf \u09aa\u09b0\u09bf\u09b7\u09c7\u09ac\u09be\u09b0 \u099a\u09c1\u0995\u09cd\u09a4\u09bf\u09b0 \u0985\u09a7\u09c0\u09a8\u09c7 \u09b2\u09c7\u0996\u0995\u09c7\u09b0 \u0995\u09b0\u09cd\u09ae\u09b8\u0982\u09b8\u09cd\u09a5\u09be\u09a8\u09c7\u09b0 \u09b8\u09ae\u09af\u09bc \u0995\u09b0\u09be \u09b9\u09af\u09bc\u0964 \u098f\u0987 \u0995\u09cd\u09b7\u09c7\u09a4\u09cd\u09b0\u09c7, \u0995\u09cb\u09a8 \u099a\u09c1\u0995\u09cd\u09a4\u09bf\u09b0 \u0985\u09a8\u09c1\u09aa\u09b8\u09cd\u09a5\u09bf\u09a4\u09bf\u09a4\u09c7, \u09b2\u09c7\u0996\u0995\u09c7\u09b0 \u09a8\u09bf\u09af\u09bc\u09cb\u0997\u0995\u09b0\u09cd\u09a4\u09be, \u09b8\u09c7 \u0995\u09be\u099c\u09c7\u09b0 \u0995\u09aa\u09bf\u09b0\u09be\u0987\u099f\u09c7\u09b0 \u09ae\u09be\u09b2\u09bf\u0995 \u09b9\u09ac\u09c7\u09a8\u0964", + "A22/BN": "\u0995\u09aa\u09bf\u09b0\u09be\u0987\u099f, \u0986\u09aa\u09a8\u09be\u09b0 \u0985\u09a7\u09bf\u0995\u09be\u09b0 \u09af\u09be \u0985\u09a8\u09cd\u09af\u0995\u09c7 \u0986\u09aa\u09a8\u09be\u09b0 \u0995\u09be\u099c \"\u0985\u09a8\u09c1\u0995\u09b0\u09a3\" \u0995\u09b0\u09a4\u09c7 \u09ac\u09be\u09a7\u09be \u09a6\u09bf\u09a4\u09c7 \u09a6\u09c7\u09af\u09bc\u0964 \u0995\u09aa\u09bf\u09b0\u09be\u0987\u099f, \u09b8\u09be\u09a7\u09be\u09b0\u09a3\u09ad\u09be\u09ac\u09c7, \u09b9\u09cb\u09b2\u09cd\u09a1\u09be\u09b0\u09a6\u09c7\u09b0 \u09a4\u09be\u09a6\u09c7\u09b0 \u0995\u09be\u099c \u09aa\u09cd\u09b0\u0995\u09be\u09b6\u09c7\u09b0, \u0985\u09a8\u09c1\u09ac\u09be\u09a6 \u0995\u09b0\u09be, \u0985\u09a8\u09c1\u09ae\u09a4\u09bf \u09ac\u09cd\u09af\u09a4\u09c0\u09a4 \u0985\u09a8\u09cd\u09af\u09a6\u09c7\u09b0 \u09a6\u09cd\u09ac\u09be\u09b0\u09be \u09ac\u09bf\u0995\u09cd\u09b0\u09bf \u0995\u09b0\u09be, \u09ac\u09be \u0985\u09a8\u09c1\u09ae\u09a4\u09bf \u099b\u09be\u09a1\u09bc\u09be\u0987 \u09aa\u09cd\u09b0\u0995\u09be\u09b6\u09cd\u09af \u09aa\u09cd\u09b0\u09a6\u09b0\u09cd\u09b6\u09a8\u09c7\u09b0 \u099c\u09a8\u09cd\u09af \u09ac\u09cd\u09af\u09ac\u09b9\u09be\u09b0 \u0995\u09b0\u09be \u09a5\u09c7\u0995\u09c7 \u09a4\u09be\u09a6\u09c7\u09b0 \u09ac\u09be\u09a7\u09be \u09a6\u09c7\u0993\u09af\u09bc\u09be\u09b0 \u0985\u09a7\u09bf\u0995\u09be\u09b0 \u09a6\u09c7\u09af\u09bc\u0964 (\u0995\u09aa\u09bf\u09b0\u09be\u0987\u099f \u0986\u0987\u09a8, \u09e7\u09ef\u09eb\u09ed \u098f\u09b0 \u09a7\u09be\u09b0\u09be \u09e7\u09ea \u09a6\u09c7\u0996\u09c1\u09a8) \u0964", + "A57/GU": "\u0aaa\u0ac7\u0a9f\u0aa8\u0acd\u0a9f \u0a85\u0ab0\u0a9c\u0ac0\u0aae\u0abe\u0a82 \u0ab5\u0abf\u0ab2\u0a82\u0aac \u0aa5\u0ab5\u0acb \u0a9c\u0acb\u0a88\u0a8f \u0aa8\u0ab9\u0ac0\u0a82 \u0a85\u0aa8\u0ac7 \u0ab6\u0a95\u0acd\u0aaf \u0a8f\u0a9f\u0ab2\u0ac0 \u0ab5\u0ab9\u0ac7\u0ab2\u0ac0 \u0aa4\u0a95\u0ac7 \u0aab\u0abe\u0a87\u0ab2 \u0a95\u0ab0\u0ac0 \u0ab6\u0a95\u0abe\u0aaf \u0a9b\u0ac7. \u0ab6\u0acb\u0aa7\u0aa8\u0ac0 \u0aaa\u0acd\u0ab0\u0a95\u0ac3\u0aa4\u0abf\u0aa8\u0abe \u0aae\u0ac2\u0ab3\u0aa8\u0ac7 \u0a9c\u0abe\u0ab9\u0ac7\u0ab0 \u0a95\u0ab0\u0aa4\u0ac0 \u0a95\u0abe\u0aae\u0a9a\u0ab2\u0abe\u0a89 \u0a85\u0ab0\u0a9c\u0ac0 \u0aab\u0abe\u0a87\u0ab2 \u0a95\u0ab0\u0ac0 \u0ab6\u0a95\u0ac7 \u0a9b\u0ac7. \u0a86 \u0ab6\u0acb\u0aa7\u0aa8\u0ac0 \u0ab5\u0abe\u0ab8\u0acd\u0aa4\u0ab5\u0abf\u0a95 \u0aa8\u0acb\u0a82\u0aa7\u0aa3\u0ac0\u0aae\u0abe\u0a82 \u0a85\u0a97\u0acd\u0ab0\u0aa4\u0abe \u0aae\u0ac7\u0ab3\u0ab5\u0ab5\u0abe\u0aae\u0abe\u0a82 \u0aae\u0aa6\u0aa6 \u0a95\u0ab0\u0ab6\u0ac7. \u0a85\u0ab0\u0a9c\u0ac0 \u0aa6\u0abe\u0a96\u0ab2 \u0a95\u0ab0\u0ab5\u0abe\u0aae\u0abe\u0a82 \u0ab5\u0abf\u0ab2\u0a82\u0aac \u0a95\u0ab0\u0ab5\u0abe\u0aae\u0abe\u0a82 \u0a86\u0ab5\u0ac7 \u0a9b\u0ac7 \u0a95\u0abe\u0ab0\u0aa3 \u0a95\u0ac7 \u0aa4\u0ac7\u0aae\u0abe\u0a82 \u0a9c\u0acb\u0a96\u0aae\u0acb \u0ab6\u0abe\u0aae\u0ac7\u0ab2 \u0a9b\u0ac7 \u0a9c\u0ac7\u0aae \u0a95\u0ac7 (i) \u0a95\u0acb\u0a88 \u0a85\u0aa8\u0acd\u0aaf \u0ab6\u0acb\u0aa7\u0a95 \u0aa6\u0acd\u0ab5\u0abe\u0ab0\u0abe \u0aa4\u0aae\u0abe\u0ab0\u0ac0 \u0ab6\u0acb\u0aa7 \u0aae\u0abe\u0a9f\u0ac7 \u0a85\u0ab0\u0a9c\u0ac0 \u0aa6\u0abe\u0a96\u0ab2 \u0a95\u0ab0\u0ac7 \u0a9b\u0ac7 \u0a85\u0aa5\u0ab5\u0abe (ii) \u0ab6\u0acb\u0aa7\u0a95 \u0aa6\u0acd\u0ab5\u0abe\u0ab0\u0abe \u0a85\u0aa5\u0ab5\u0abe \u0a85\u0aa8\u0acd\u0aaf \u0ab8\u0acd\u0ab5\u0aa4\u0a82\u0aa4\u0acd\u0ab0 \u0aaa\u0a95\u0acd\u0ab7\u0acb \u0aa6\u0acd\u0ab5\u0abe\u0ab0\u0abe \u0aa4\u0aae\u0abe\u0ab0\u0ac0 \u0ab6\u0acb\u0aa7 \u0ab5\u0abf\u0ab6\u0ac7 \u0a9c\u0abe\u0a97\u0ac3\u0aa4 \u0a95\u0ab0\u0ab5\u0abe.", + "A47/GU": "\u0aa8\u0ac0\u0a9a\u0ac7 \u0a86\u0aaa\u0ac7\u0ab2\u0abe \u0a95\u0acb\u0a88\u0aaa\u0aa3 \u0a86\u0aa7\u0abe\u0ab0 \u0aaa\u0ab0 \u0a95\u0a82\u0a9f\u0acd\u0ab0\u0acb\u0ab2\u0ab0 \u0a91\u0aab \u0aa1\u0abf\u0a9d\u0abe\u0a88\u0aa8\u0aa8\u0ac7 \u0aa8\u0abf\u0aaf\u0aa4 \u0aab\u0ac0 \u0ab8\u0abe\u0aa5\u0ac7 \u0aab\u0acb\u0ab0\u0acd\u0aae 8 \u0aae\u0abe\u0a82 \u0ab0\u0aa6 \u0a95\u0ab0\u0ab5\u0abe \u0aae\u0abe\u0a9f\u0ac7\u0aa8\u0ac0 \u0a85\u0ab0\u0a9c\u0ac0 \u0aaa\u0ab0 \u0aa1\u0abf\u0a9d\u0abe\u0a87\u0aa8\u0aa8\u0ac0 \u0aa8\u0acb\u0a82\u0aa7\u0aa3\u0ac0 \u0aaa\u0a9b\u0ac0 \u0a95\u0acb\u0a88\u0aaa\u0aa3 \u0ab8\u0aae\u0aaf\u0ac7 \u0aa1\u0abf\u0a9d\u0abe\u0a87\u0aa8\u0aa8\u0ac0 \u0aa8\u0acb\u0a82\u0aa7\u0aa3\u0ac0 \u0ab0\u0aa6 \u0aa5\u0a88 \u0ab6\u0a95\u0ac7 \u0a9b\u0ac7: \u0aa1\u0abf\u0a9d\u0abe\u0a87\u0aa8 \u0a85\u0a97\u0abe\u0a89 \u0aad\u0abe\u0ab0\u0aa4\u0aae\u0abe\u0a82 \u0aa8\u0acb\u0a82\u0aa7\u0abe\u0aaf\u0ac7\u0ab2 \u0a9b\u0ac7. \u0aa4\u0ac7 \u0aad\u0abe\u0ab0\u0aa4\u0aae\u0abe\u0a82 \u0a85\u0aa5\u0ab5\u0abe \u0a85\u0aa8\u0acd\u0aaf\u0aa4\u0acd\u0ab0 \u0aa8\u0acb\u0a82\u0aa7\u0aa3\u0ac0\u0aa8\u0ac0 \u0aa4\u0abe\u0ab0\u0ac0\u0a96 \u0aaa\u0ab9\u0ac7\u0ab2\u0abe \u0aaa\u0acd\u0ab0\u0a95\u0abe\u0ab6\u0abf\u0aa4 \u0a95\u0ab0\u0ab5\u0abe\u0aae\u0abe\u0a82 \u0a86\u0ab5\u0ac0 \u0a9b\u0ac7. \u0aa1\u0abf\u0a9d\u0abe\u0a87\u0aa8 \u0aa8\u0acb\u0a82\u0aa7\u0aa3\u0ac0 \u0aaf\u0acb\u0a97\u0acd\u0aaf \u0aa8\u0aa5\u0ac0. \u0aa1\u0abf\u0a9d\u0abe\u0a87\u0aa8 \u0aa8\u0ab5\u0ac0 \u0a95\u0ac7 \u0aae\u0ac2\u0ab3 \u0aa8\u0aa5\u0ac0. \u0aa4\u0ac7 \u0ab5\u0abf\u0aad\u0abe\u0a97 2 (\u0aa1\u0ac0) \u0ab9\u0ac7\u0aa0\u0ab3 \u0a9c\u0aa3\u0abe\u0ab5\u0ac7\u0ab2 \u0aa1\u0abf\u0a9d\u0abe\u0a87\u0aa8\u0aa8\u0ac0 \u0ab5\u0acd\u0aaf\u0abe\u0a96\u0acd\u0aaf\u0abe \u0ab9\u0ac7\u0aa0\u0ab3\u0aa8\u0ac0 \u0aa1\u0abf\u0a9d\u0abe\u0a87\u0aa8 \u0aa8\u0aa5\u0ac0. (\u0aa1\u0abf\u0a9d\u0abe\u0a87\u0aa8 \u0a8f\u0a95\u0acd\u0a9f, 2000 \u0aa8\u0ac0 \u0ab8\u0ac7\u0a95\u0ab6\u0aa8 19 \u0a9c\u0ac1\u0a93).", + "A4/GU": "\u0a9f\u0acd\u0ab0\u0ac7\u0aa1\u0aae\u0abe\u0ab0\u0acd\u0a95 \u0aa8\u0acb \u0a85\u0ab0\u0acd\u0aa5 \u0a8f\u0ab5\u0acb \u0aa5\u0abe\u0aaf \u0a9b\u0ac7 \u0a95\u0ac7 \u0a9c\u0ac7 \u0ab8\u0abe\u0aae\u0abe\u0aa8 \u0a85\u0aa5\u0ab5\u0abe \u0ab8\u0ac7\u0ab5\u0abe\u0aa8\u0ac7 \u0a8f\u0a95 \u0a8f\u0aa8\u0acd\u0a9f\u0abf\u0a9f\u0ac0\u0aae\u0abe\u0a82\u0aa5\u0ac0 \u0a89\u0aa6\u0acd\u0aad\u0ab5\u0ac7 \u0a9b\u0ac7 \u0aa4\u0ac7 \u0a93\u0ab3\u0a96\u0ab5\u0abe\u0aae\u0abe\u0a82 \u0aae\u0aa6\u0aa6 \u0a95\u0ab0\u0ac7 \u0a9b\u0ac7. \u0aa4\u0ac7 \u0a8f\u0a95 \u0ab5\u0abf\u0a9d\u0acd\u0aaf\u0ac1\u0a85\u0ab2 \u0ab8\u0abf\u0aae\u0acd\u0aac\u0acb\u0ab2 \u0a85\u0aa5\u0ab5\u0abe \u0aae\u0abe\u0ab0\u0acd\u0a95 \u0a9b\u0ac7 \u0a9c\u0ac7\u0aa8\u0acb \u0a89\u0aaa\u0aaf\u0acb\u0a97 \u0a8f\u0a95 \u0a8f\u0aa8\u0acd\u0a9f\u0ab0\u0aaa\u0acd\u0ab0\u0abe\u0a88\u0a9d \u0aa6\u0acd\u0ab5\u0abe\u0ab0\u0abe \u0aa4\u0ac7\u0aae\u0aa8\u0abe \u0ab8\u0abe\u0aae\u0abe\u0aa8 \u0a85\u0aa5\u0ab5\u0abe \u0ab8\u0ac7\u0ab5\u0abe\u0a93\u0aa8\u0ac7 \u0a85\u0aa8\u0acd\u0aaf \u0ab8\u0abe\u0ab9\u0ab8\u0acb\u0aa5\u0ac0 \u0a85\u0ab2\u0a97 \u0a95\u0ab0\u0ab5\u0abe \u0aae\u0abe\u0a9f\u0ac7 \u0a95\u0ab0\u0ab5\u0abe\u0aae\u0abe\u0a82 \u0a86\u0ab5\u0ac7 \u0a9b\u0ac7. \u0aa4\u0ac7 \u0a97\u0acd\u0ab0\u0abe\u0ab9\u0a95\u0aa8\u0ac7 \u0a89\u0aa4\u0acd\u0aaa\u0abe\u0aa6\u0aa8 \u0a85\u0aa5\u0ab5\u0abe \u0ab8\u0ac7\u0ab5\u0abe\u0aa8\u0abe \u0a9a\u0acb\u0a95\u0acd\u0a95\u0ab8 \u0aac\u0acd\u0ab0\u0abe\u0a82\u0aa1\u0aa8\u0ac7 \u0a93\u0ab3\u0a96\u0ab5\u0abe\u0aae\u0abe\u0a82 \u0a85\u0aa8\u0ac7 \u0aac\u0ac0\u0a9c\u0abe\u0aa5\u0ac0 \u0a85\u0ab2\u0a97 \u0aaa\u0abe\u0aa1\u0ab5\u0abe\u0aae\u0abe\u0a82 \u0aae\u0aa6\u0aa6 \u0a95\u0ab0\u0ac7 \u0a9b\u0ac7 (\u0a9f\u0acd\u0ab0\u0ac7\u0aa1 \u0aae\u0abe\u0ab0\u0acd\u0a95\u0acd\u0ab8\u0aa8\u0ac0 \u0ab5\u0acd\u0aaf\u0abe\u0a96\u0acd\u0aaf\u0abe \u0aae\u0abe\u0a9f\u0ac7, \u0a9f\u0acd\u0ab0\u0ac7\u0aa1 \u0aae\u0abe\u0ab0\u0acd\u0a95\u0acd\u0ab8 \u0a8f\u0a95\u0acd\u0a9f, 1999 \u0aa8\u0ac0 \u0a95\u0ab2\u0aae 2(1)(\u0a9d\u0ac7\u0aa1 \u0aac\u0ac0) \u0a9c\u0ac1\u0a93).", + "A29/GU": "\u0aae\u0ac2\u0ab3 \u0ab8\u0abe\u0ab9\u0abf\u0aa4\u0acd\u0aaf\u0abf\u0a95, \u0aa8\u0abe\u0a9f\u0a95\u0ac0\u0aaf, \u0ab8\u0a82\u0a97\u0ac0\u0aa4 \u0a85\u0aa8\u0ac7 \u0a95\u0ab2\u0abe\u0aa4\u0acd\u0aae\u0a95 \u0a95\u0abe\u0ab0\u0acd\u0aaf\u0aa8\u0abe \u0a95\u0abf\u0ab8\u0acd\u0ab8\u0abe\u0aae\u0abe\u0a82, \u0a95\u0acb\u0aaa\u0ac0\u0ab0\u0abe\u0a88\u0a9f\u0aa8\u0acb \u0ab8\u0aae\u0aaf\u0a97\u0abe\u0ab3\u0acb \u0ab2\u0ac7\u0a96\u0a95\u0aa8\u0ac1\u0a82 \u0a9c\u0ac0\u0ab5\u0aa8\u0a95\u0abe\u0ab3 \u0a9b\u0ac7, \u0a89\u0aaa\u0ab0\u0abe\u0a82\u0aa4 \u0ab2\u0ac7\u0a96\u0a95\u0aa8\u0abe \u0aae\u0ac3\u0aa4\u0acd\u0aaf\u0ac1 \u0aaa\u0a9b\u0ac0\u0aa8\u0abe \u0ab5\u0ab0\u0acd\u0ab7\u0aa5\u0ac0 60 \u0ab5\u0ab0\u0acd\u0ab7. \u0ab8\u0abf\u0aa8\u0ac7\u0aae\u0ac7\u0a9f\u0acb\u0a97\u0acd\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aab\u0abf\u0a95 \u0aab\u0abf\u0ab2\u0acd\u0aae\u0acb \u0a85\u0aa8\u0ac7 \u0ab8\u0abe\u0a89\u0aa8\u0acd\u0aa1 \u0ab0\u0ac7\u0a95\u0acb\u0ab0\u0acd\u0aa1\u0abf\u0a82\u0a97\u0aa8\u0abe \u0a95\u0abf\u0ab8\u0acd\u0ab8\u0abe\u0aae\u0abe\u0a82, \u0ab8\u0aae\u0aaf\u0a97\u0abe\u0ab3\u0acb \u0aaa\u0acd\u0ab0\u0a95\u0abe\u0ab6\u0aa8\u0aa8\u0abe \u0ab5\u0ab0\u0acd\u0ab7 \u0aaa\u0a9b\u0ac0\u0aa8\u0abe \u0aa4\u0abe\u0aa4\u0acd\u0a95\u0abe\u0ab2\u0abf\u0a95 \u0a95\u0ac7\u0ab2\u0ac7\u0aa8\u0acd\u0aa1\u0ab0 \u0ab5\u0ab0\u0acd\u0ab7\u0aa5\u0ac0 \u0ab6\u0ab0\u0ac2 \u0a95\u0ab0\u0ac0\u0aa8\u0ac7 60 \u0ab5\u0ab0\u0acd\u0ab7\u0aa8\u0acb \u0a9b\u0ac7. (\u0a95\u0acb\u0aaa\u0ac0\u0ab0\u0abe\u0a88\u0a9f \u0a8f\u0a95\u0acd\u0a9f, 1957\u0aa8\u0ac1\u0a82 \u0aaa\u0acd\u0ab0\u0a95\u0ab0\u0aa3 V \u0a9c\u0ac1\u0a93)", + "A30/GU": "\u0ab8\u0abe\u0aae\u0abe\u0aa8\u0acd\u0aaf \u0ab0\u0ac0\u0aa4\u0ac7 \u0ab2\u0ac7\u0a96\u0a95 \u0a85\u0aa5\u0ab5\u0abe \u0a95\u0ac3\u0aa4\u0abf\u0aa8\u0abe \u0ab8\u0ab0\u0acd\u0a9c\u0a95 \u0a95\u0ac3\u0aa4\u0abf\u0aae\u0abe\u0a82 \u0a95\u0acb\u0aaa\u0ac0\u0ab0\u0abe\u0a88\u0a9f\u0aa8\u0abe \u0aae\u0abe\u0ab2\u0abf\u0a95 \u0ab9\u0acb\u0aaf \u0a9b\u0ac7. \u0a9c\u0acb \u0a95\u0ac7, \u0a86 \u0aae\u0abe\u0ab2\u0abf\u0a95\u0ac0\u0aa8\u0abe \u0aa8\u0abf\u0aaf\u0aae\u0aae\u0abe\u0a82 \u0a85\u0aae\u0ac1\u0a95 \u0a85\u0aaa\u0ab5\u0abe\u0aa6\u0acb \u0a9b\u0ac7 \u0a9c\u0ac7 \u0a95\u0abe\u0aaf\u0aa6\u0abe\u0aa8\u0ac0 \u0a95\u0ab2\u0aae 17 \u0ab9\u0ac7\u0aa0\u0ab3 \u0aaa\u0acd\u0ab0\u0aa6\u0abe\u0aa8 \u0a95\u0ab0\u0ab5\u0abe\u0aae\u0abe\u0a82 \u0a86\u0ab5\u0acd\u0aaf\u0abe \u0a9b\u0ac7. \u0a86\u0aae\u0abe\u0a82\u0aa8\u0abe \u0ab8\u0acc\u0aa5\u0ac0 \u0ab8\u0abe\u0aae\u0abe\u0aa8\u0acd\u0aaf \u0a85\u0aaa\u0ab5\u0abe\u0aa6\u0acb \u0a8f\u0ab5\u0abe \u0a95\u0abf\u0ab8\u0acd\u0ab8\u0abe \u0a9b\u0ac7 \u0a95\u0ac7 \u0a9c\u0acd\u0aaf\u0abe\u0a82 \u0a95\u0abe\u0aae \u0ab8\u0ac7\u0ab5\u0abe\u0aa8\u0abe \u0a95\u0ab0\u0abe\u0ab0 \u0ab9\u0ac7\u0aa0\u0ab3 \u0ab2\u0ac7\u0a96\u0a95\u0aa8\u0ac0 \u0ab0\u0acb\u0a9c\u0a97\u0abe\u0ab0 \u0aa6\u0ab0\u0aae\u0abf\u0aaf\u0abe\u0aa8 \u0a95\u0ab0\u0ab5\u0abe\u0aae\u0abe\u0a82 \u0a86\u0ab5\u0ac7 \u0a9b\u0ac7. \u0a86 \u0a95\u0abf\u0ab8\u0acd\u0ab8\u0abe\u0aae\u0abe\u0a82, \u0ab2\u0ac7\u0a96\u0a95\u0aa8\u0abe \u0aa8\u0acb\u0a95\u0ab0\u0ac0\u0aa6\u0abe\u0aa4\u0abe, \u0aa4\u0ac7\u0aa8\u0abe\u0aa5\u0ac0 \u0ab5\u0abf\u0aaa\u0ab0\u0ac0\u0aa4 \u0a95\u0acb\u0a88\u0aaa\u0aa3 \u0a95\u0ab0\u0abe\u0ab0\u0aa8\u0ac0 \u0a97\u0ac7\u0ab0\u0ab9\u0abe\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0ac0\u0aae\u0abe\u0a82, \u0a89\u0aa4\u0acd\u0aaa\u0abe\u0aa6\u0abf\u0aa4 \u0a95\u0abe\u0ab0\u0acd\u0aaf\u0aae\u0abe\u0a82 \u0a95\u0ac9\u0aaa\u0abf\u0ab0\u0abe\u0a87\u0a9f\u0aa8\u0abe \u0aae\u0abe\u0ab2\u0abf\u0a95 \u0ab9\u0ab6\u0ac7.", + "A57/HI": "\u090f\u0915 \u092a\u0947\u091f\u0947\u0902\u091f \u0906\u0935\u0947\u0926\u0928 \u092e\u0947\u0902 \u0926\u0947\u0930\u0940 \u0928\u0939\u0940\u0902 \u0915\u0940 \u091c\u093e\u0928\u0940 \u091a\u093e\u0939\u093f\u090f \u0914\u0930 \u091c\u0932\u094d\u0926 \u0938\u0947 \u091c\u0932\u094d\u0926 \u0938\u0902\u092d\u0935 \u0924\u093f\u0925\u093f \u092a\u0930 \u0926\u093e\u092f\u0930 \u0915\u093f\u092f\u093e \u091c\u093e\u0928\u093e \u091a\u093e\u0939\u093f\u090f\u0964 \u0906\u0935\u093f\u0937\u094d\u0915\u093e\u0930 \u0915\u0940 \u0938\u094d\u0935\u0930\u0942\u092a \u0915\u093e \u0916\u0941\u0932\u093e\u0938\u093e \u0915\u0930\u0924\u0947 \u0939\u0941\u090f \u090f\u0915 \u0905\u0928\u0902\u0924\u093f\u092e \u0906\u0935\u0947\u0926\u0928 (provisional application) \u0926\u093e\u092f\u0930 \u0915\u0930 \u0938\u0915\u0924\u0947 \u0939\u0948\u0902\u0964 \u0907\u0938\u0938\u0947 \u0906\u0935\u093f\u0937\u094d\u0915\u093e\u0930 \u0915\u0947 \u0905\u0938\u0932 \u092a\u0902\u091c\u0940\u0915\u0930\u0923 (actual registration) \u092e\u0947\u0902 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u093e\u0925\u092e\u093f\u0915\u0924\u093e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u093e\u092a\u094d\u0924 \u0915\u0930\u0928\u0947 \u092e\u0947\u0902 \u092e\u0926\u0926 \u092e\u093f\u0932\u0947\u0917\u0940\u0964 \u0906\u0935\u0947\u0926\u0928 \u092a\u0924\u094d\u0930 \u0926\u093e\u0916\u093f\u0932 \u0915\u0930\u0928\u0947 \u092e\u0947\u0902 \u0926\u0947\u0930\u0940 \u0915\u0930\u0928\u0947 \u0915\u0940 \u0938\u0932\u093e\u0939 \u0928\u0939\u0940\u0902 \u0926\u0940 \u091c\u093e\u0924\u0940 \u0915\u094d\u092f\u094b\u0902\u0915\u093f \u0907\u0938\u092e\u0947\u0902 \u091c\u094b\u0916\u093f\u092e \u0936\u093e\u092e\u093f\u0932 \u0939\u0948\u0902 \u091c\u0948\u0938\u0947 (i) \u0915\u093f\u0938\u0940 \u0905\u0928\u094d\u092f \u0906\u0935\u093f\u0937\u094d\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0915 \u0926\u094d\u0935\u093e\u0930\u093e \u0906\u092a\u0915\u0947 \u0906\u0935\u093f\u0937\u094d\u0915\u093e\u0930 \u0915\u0947 \u0932\u093f\u090f \u0906\u0935\u0947\u0926\u0928 \u0926\u093e\u0916\u093f\u0932 \u0915\u0930 \u0926\u093f\u092f\u093e \u091c\u093e\u0928\u093e \u092f\u093e (ii) \u0906\u0935\u093f\u0937\u094d\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0915 \u0926\u094d\u0935\u093e\u0930\u093e \u092d\u0942\u0932 \u0938\u0947 \u0905\u092a\u0928\u0947 \u0906\u0935\u093f\u0937\u094d\u0915\u093e\u0930 \u0915\u0940 \u091c\u093e\u0928\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0938\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0935\u091c\u0928\u093f\u0915 \u0915\u0930 \u0926\u0940 \u091c\u093e\u0928\u093e \u0964", + "A31/HI": "\u2018\u0915\u0932\u093e\u0915\u093e\u0930\u2019 \u092e\u0947\u0902 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0926\u0930\u094d\u0936\u0928 \u0915\u0930\u0928\u0947 \u0935\u093e\u0932\u0947 \u0932\u094b\u0917 \u0936\u093e\u092e\u093f\u0932 \u0939\u094b\u0924\u0947 \u0939\u0948\u0902 \u091c\u0948\u0938\u0947 \u0905\u092d\u093f\u0928\u0947\u0924\u093e , \u0917\u093e\u092f\u0915 , \u0938\u0902\u0917\u0940\u0924\u0915\u093e\u0930 , \u0921\u093e\u0902\u0938\u0930, \u090f\u0915\u094d\u0930\u094b\u092c\u0948\u091f, \u092c\u093e\u091c\u0940\u0917\u0930 \u0906\u0926\u093f\u0964\u092f\u0939 \u0932\u094b\u0917 \u0905\u0915\u094d\u0938\u0930 \u0915\u093f\u0938\u0940 \u0930\u091a\u092f\u093f\u0924\u093e \u0915\u0940 \u0915\u0943\u0924\u093f \u0915\u093e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0926\u0930\u094d\u0936\u0928 \u0915\u0930\u0924\u0947 \u0939\u0948\u0964\u091c\u0948\u0938\u0947 \u090f\u0915 \u0905\u092d\u093f\u0928\u0947\u0924\u093e \u090f\u0915 \u0932\u0947\u0916\u0915 \u0915\u0947 \u0926\u094d\u0935\u093e\u0930\u093e \u0932\u093f\u0916\u0940 \u0917\u092f\u0940 \u0915\u0939\u093e\u0928\u0940 \u0915\u093e \u0905\u092a\u0928\u0947 \u0905\u0902\u0926\u093e\u091c \u092e\u0947\u0902 \u0905\u092d\u093f\u0928\u092f \u0915\u0930\u0924\u093e \u0939\u0948\u0964 \u0910\u0938\u0947 \u092e\u0947\u0902, \u090f\u0915 \u0915\u0932\u093e\u0915\u093e\u0930 \u0915\u094b \u0915\u0941\u091b \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0926\u093e\u0928 \u0915\u093f\u090f \u091c\u093e\u0924\u0947 \u0939\u0948\u0902 \u091c\u094b \u0930\u091a\u092f\u093f\u0924\u093e \u0915\u0947 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u094b\u0902 \u0938\u0947 \u092d\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0928 \u0939\u094b\u0924\u0947 \u0939\u0948\u0964 \u0915\u094b\u0908 \u092d\u0940 \u0935\u094d\u092f\u0915\u094d\u0924\u093f \u0915\u0932\u093e\u0915\u093e\u0930 \u0915\u0940 \u0938\u0939\u092e\u0924\u093f \u0915\u0947 \u092c\u093f\u0928\u093e \u0928\u093f\u092e\u094d\u0928\u0932\u093f\u0916\u093f\u0924 \u0915\u093e\u0930\u094d\u092f \u0928\u0939\u0940\u0902 \u0915\u0930 \u0938\u0915\u0924\u093e \u0939\u0948 : \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0926\u0930\u094d\u0936\u0928 \u0915\u0940 \u0927\u094d\u0935\u0928\u093f \u0930\u093f\u0915\u0949\u0930\u094d\u0921\u093f\u0902\u0917 \u092f\u093e \u0935\u093f\u091c\u093c\u0941\u0905\u0932 \u0930\u093f\u0915\u0949\u0930\u094d\u0921\u093f\u0902\u0917 \u0915\u094b \u092a\u0941\u0928: \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u094d\u0924\u0941\u0924 \u0915\u0930\u0947\u0902; \u091c\u0939\u093e\u0902 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0926\u0930\u094d\u0936\u0928 \u092a\u0939\u0932\u0947 \u0938\u0947 \u0939\u0940 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0930\u093f\u0924 \u0939\u0948 , \u0909\u0938\u0947 \u091b\u094b\u0921\u093c\u0915\u0930 \u091c\u0928\u0924\u093e \u0915\u0947 \u0932\u093f\u090f \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0926\u0930\u094d\u0936\u0928 \u0915\u093e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0930\u0923 \u092f\u093e \u0938\u0902\u091a\u093e\u0930 \u0915\u0930\u0947\u0902 \u0964 \u090f\u0915 \u0915\u0932\u093e\u0915\u093e\u0930 \u0915\u0947 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930 50 \u0935\u0930\u094d\u0937\u094b\u0902 \u0915\u0947 \u0932\u093f\u090f \u092e\u093e\u0928\u094d\u092f \u0939\u0948\u0902 \u0964 (\u0915\u0949\u092a\u0940\u0930\u093e\u0907\u091f \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0928\u093f\u092f\u092e, 1957 \u0915\u0940 \u0927\u093e\u0930\u093e 57 \u0926\u0947\u0916\u0947\u0902 ) \u0907\u0938\u0915\u0947 \u0905\u0932\u093e\u0935\u093e, \u0915\u0932\u093e\u0915\u093e\u0930 \u0915\u094b \u0905\u092a\u0928\u0947 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0926\u0930\u094d\u0936\u0928 \u0915\u0947 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0926\u0930\u094d\u0936\u0928\u0915\u0930\u094d\u0924\u093e \u0915\u0947 \u0930\u0942\u092a \u092e\u0947\u0902 \u092a\u0939\u091a\u093e\u0928\u0947 \u091c\u093e\u0928\u0947 \u0915\u093e \u0928\u0948\u0924\u093f\u0915 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930 \u092d\u0940 \u0939\u0948\u0964 \u0935\u0947 \u0915\u093f\u0938\u0940 \u0915\u0947 \u0926\u094d\u0935\u093e\u0930\u093e \u0939\u094b \u0930\u0939\u0947 \u0905\u092a\u0928\u0947 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0926\u0930\u094d\u0936\u0928 \u0915\u0947 \u092a\u0930\u093f\u0935\u0930\u094d\u0924\u0928 \u092f\u093e \u0938\u0902\u0936\u094b\u0927\u0928 \u0915\u094b \u092d\u0940 \u0930\u094b\u0915 \u0938\u0915\u0924\u0947 \u0939\u0948\u0902, \u0905\u0917\u0930 \u0909\u0928\u094d\u0939\u0947\u0902 \u0932\u0917\u0924\u093e \u0939\u0948 \u0915\u093f \u0909\u0938\u0938\u0947 \u0909\u0928\u0915\u0940 \u090f\u0915 \u0915\u0932\u093e\u0915\u093e\u0930 \u0915\u0947 \u0930\u0942\u092a \u092e\u0947\u0902 \u092e\u094c\u091c\u0942\u0926 \u0909\u0928\u0915\u0940 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0924\u093f\u0937\u094d\u0920\u093e \u0915\u094b \u0928\u0941\u0915\u0938\u093e\u0928 \u0939\u094b \u0930\u0939\u093e \u0939\u0948 \u0964", + "A32/HI": "\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0930\u0915\u094b\u0902 \u0915\u0947 \u092a\u093e\u0938 \u0905\u092a\u0928\u0947 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0930\u0923 \u092a\u0930 \"\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0930\u0923 \u092a\u0941\u0928\u0930\u0941\u0924\u094d\u092a\u093e\u0926\u0928 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\" (Broadcast Reproduction Rights) \u0928\u093e\u092e \u0915\u0947 \u0935\u093f\u0936\u0947\u0937 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930 \u0939\u0948\u0964\u0907\u0938 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930 \u0915\u0947 \u0924\u0939\u0924 \u0915\u094b\u0908 \u092d\u0940 \u092c\u094d\u0930\u0949\u0921\u0915\u093e\u0938\u094d\u091f\u0930 \u0915\u0940 \u0905\u0928\u0941\u092e\u0924\u093f \u0915\u0947 \u092c\u093f\u0928\u093e \u0928\u093f\u092e\u094d\u0928 \u0915\u093e\u0930\u094d\u092f \u0928\u0939\u0940\u0902 \u0915\u0930 \u0938\u0915\u0924\u093e \u0939\u0948: \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0930\u0923 \u0915\u094b \u092b\u093f\u0930 \u0938\u0947 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0930\u093f\u0924 \u0915\u0930\u0928\u093e\u0964 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0930\u0923 \u0915\u094b \u092a\u0948\u0938\u0947 \u0915\u0947 \u092c\u0926\u0932\u0947 \u0938\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0935\u091c\u0928\u093f\u0915 \u0915\u0930 \u0926\u0947\u0928\u093e\u0964 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0930\u0923 \u0915\u0940 \u0911\u0921\u093f\u092f\u094b \u0935\u093f\u091c\u0941\u0905\u0932 \u0930\u093f\u0915\u0949\u0930\u094d\u0921\u093f\u0902\u0917 \u092c\u0928\u093e\u0928\u093e\u0964 \u0910\u0938\u0940 \u0930\u093f\u0915\u0949\u0930\u094d\u0921\u093f\u0902\u0917 \u0915\u094b \u0915\u093f\u0930\u093e\u090f \u092a\u0930 \u0926\u0947\u0928\u093e \u092f\u093e \u092c\u0947\u091a\u0928\u093e\u0964 \u092c\u094d\u0930\u0949\u0921\u0915\u093e\u0938\u094d\u091f\u0930 \u0915\u093e \u092f\u0939 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930 25 \u0938\u093e\u0932 \u0915\u0947 \u0932\u093f\u090f \u0935\u0948\u0927 \u0939\u0948\u0964( \u0915\u0949\u092a\u0940\u0930\u093e\u0907\u091f \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0928\u093f\u092f\u092e, 1957 \u0915\u0940 \u0927\u093e\u0930\u093e 37 \u0926\u0947\u0916\u0947\u0902 )", + "A15/HI": "\u092a\u0902\u091c\u0940\u0915\u0930\u0923 \u0915\u0947 \u0932\u093f\u090f \u0906\u0935\u0947\u0926\u0928 \u0915\u0930\u0928\u0947 \u0938\u0947 \u092a\u0939\u0932\u0947 \u091f\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0921\u092e\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0915 \u0915\u093e \u0909\u092a\u092f\u094b\u0917 \u0915\u0930\u0928\u093e \u0906\u0935\u0936\u094d\u092f\u0915 \u0928\u0939\u0940\u0902 \u0939\u0948\u0964 \u0906\u0935\u0947\u0926\u0928 \"\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u094d\u0924\u093e\u0935\u093f\u0924 \u0909\u092a\u092f\u094b\u0917\" \u0915\u0947 \u0906\u0927\u093e\u0930 \u092a\u0930 \u092d\u0940 \u0924\u0939\u0924 \u0926\u093e\u092f\u0930 \u0915\u093f\u092f\u093e \u091c\u093e \u0938\u0915\u0924\u093e \u0939\u0948\u0964 \u0906\u092a\u0915\u094b \u0915\u0947\u0935\u0932 \u092d\u0935\u093f\u0937\u094d\u092f \u092e\u0947\u0902 \u0910\u0938\u0947 \u091f\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0921\u092e\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0915 \u0915\u0947 \u0909\u092a\u092f\u094b\u0917 \u0915\u094b \u0938\u093e\u092c\u093f\u0924 \u0915\u0930\u0928\u093e \u0939\u094b\u0917\u093e \u0914\u0930 \u092f\u0939 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0926\u0930\u094d\u0936\u093f\u0924 \u0915\u0930\u0928\u093e \u0939\u094b\u0917\u093e \u0915\u093f \u0909\u092a\u092f\u094b\u0917 \u0928\u0947\u0915\u0928\u0940\u092f\u0924\u0940 (good faith) \u092e\u0947\u0902 \u0915\u093f\u092f\u093e \u091c\u093e \u0930\u0939\u093e \u0939\u0948\u0964", + "A42/HI": "\u0921\u093f\u091c\u093e\u0907\u0928 \u0915\u0947 \u092a\u0902\u091c\u0940\u0915\u0930\u0923 \u092a\u0930, \u092a\u094d\u0930\u094b\u092a\u0930\u093e\u0907\u091f\u0930 \u0915\u0947 \u092a\u093e\u0938 \u092a\u0902\u091c\u0940\u0915\u0930\u0923 \u0915\u0940 \u0905\u0935\u0927\u093f \u0915\u0947 \u0932\u093f\u090f \u0921\u093f\u091c\u093e\u0907\u0928 \u092e\u0947\u0902 '\u0915\u0949\u092a\u0940\u0930\u093e\u0907\u091f' \u0939\u0948\u0964 \u092f\u0939 \u0938\u093e\u092e\u093e\u0928\u094d\u092f \u0915\u0949\u092a\u0940\u0930\u093e\u0907\u091f \u0938\u0947 \u0905\u0932\u0917 \u0939\u0948\u0964 \u092f\u0939\u093e\u0901, '\u0915\u0949\u092a\u0940\u0930\u093e\u0907\u091f' \u0936\u092c\u094d\u0926 \u0915\u093e \u0905\u0930\u094d\u0925 \u0939\u0948 \u0915\u093f \u092a\u0902\u091c\u0940\u0915\u0943\u0924 \u0921\u093f\u091c\u093e\u0907\u0928 \u0915\u093e \u0909\u092a\u092f\u094b\u0917 \u0915\u0930\u0928\u0947 \u0915\u093e \u0905\u0928\u0928\u094d\u092f \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0964", + "A56/ML": "\u0d12\u0d30\u0d41 \u0d21\u0d3f\u0d2b\u0d4b\u0d7e\u0d1f\u0d4d\u0d1f\u0d4d \u0d31\u0d42\u0d7e \u0d0e\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28 \u0d28\u0d3f\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3f\u0d7d, \u0d2a\u0d4d\u0d30\u0d38\u0d3f\u0d26\u0d4d\u0d27\u0d40\u0d15\u0d30\u0d3f\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d2a\u0d4d\u0d2a\u0d46\u0d1f\u0d4d\u0d1f\u0d24\u0d4b \u0d2a\u0d4a\u0d24\u0d41\u0d35\u0d3e\u0d2f\u0d3f \u0d2a\u0d4d\u0d30\u0d26\u0d7c\u0d36\u0d3f\u0d2a\u0d4d\u0d2a\u0d3f\u0d1a\u0d4d\u0d1a\u0d24\u0d4b \u0d06\u0d2f \u0d12\u0d30\u0d41 \u0d15\u0d23\u0d4d\u0d1f\u0d41\u0d2a\u0d3f\u0d1f\u0d41\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d24\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d24\u0d3f\u0d28\u0d4d \u0d2a\u0d47\u0d31\u0d4d\u0d31\u0d7b\u0d4d\u0d31 \u0d32\u0d2d\u0d3f\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d3f\u0d32\u0d4d\u0d32, \u0d15\u0d3e\u0d30\u0d23\u0d02 \u0d05\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d24\u0d30\u0d02 \u0d2a\u0d4d\u0d30\u0d38\u0d3f\u0d26\u0d4d\u0d27\u0d40\u0d15\u0d30\u0d23\u0d2e\u0d4b \u0d2a\u0d4a\u0d24\u0d41 \u0d2a\u0d4d\u0d30\u0d26\u0d7c\u0d36\u0d28\u0d2e\u0d4b \u0d2a\u0d41\u0d24\u0d41\u0d2e\u0d2f\u0d41\u0d1f\u0d46 \u0d05\u0d2d\u0d3e\u0d35\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d24\u0d3f\u0d32\u0d47\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d4d \u0d28\u0d2f\u0d3f\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d41\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28\u0d41. \u0d0e\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28\u0d3f\u0d30\u0d41\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28\u0d3e\u0d32\u0d41\u0d02, \u0d1a\u0d3f\u0d32 \u0d2a\u0d4d\u0d30\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d2f\u0d47\u0d15 \u0d38\u0d3e\u0d39\u0d1a\u0d30\u0d4d\u0d2f\u0d19\u0d4d\u0d19\u0d33\u0d3f\u0d7d, \u0d2a\u0d47\u0d31\u0d4d\u0d31\u0d7b\u0d4d\u0d31 \u0d28\u0d3f\u0d2f\u0d2e\u0d02 \u0d12\u0d30\u0d41 \u0d1c\u0d47\u0d23\u0d32\u0d3f\u0d7d \u0d2a\u0d4d\u0d30\u0d38\u0d3f\u0d26\u0d4d\u0d27\u0d40\u0d15\u0d30\u0d3f\u0d1a\u0d4d\u0d1a \u0d24\u0d40\u0d2f\u0d24\u0d3f \u0d2e\u0d41\u0d24\u0d7d \u0d05\u0d32\u0d4d\u0d32\u0d46\u0d19\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d3f\u0d7d \u0d17\u0d35\u0d7a\u0d2e\u0d46\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d31\u0d4d \u0d38\u0d02\u0d18\u0d1f\u0d3f\u0d2a\u0d4d\u0d2a\u0d3f\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d41\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28 \u0d12\u0d30\u0d41 \u0d0e\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d38\u0d3f\u0d2c\u0d3f\u0d37\u0d28\u0d3f\u0d7d \u0d05\u0d32\u0d4d\u0d32\u0d46\u0d19\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d3f\u0d7d \u0d0f\u0d24\u0d46\u0d19\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d3f\u0d32\u0d41\u0d02 \u0d2a\u0d20\u0d3f\u0d1a\u0d4d\u0d1a \u0d38\u0d2e\u0d42\u0d39\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d24\u0d3f\u0d28\u0d4d \u0d2e\u0d41\u0d2c\u0d3e\u0d15\u0d46\u0d2f\u0d4a\u0d33\u0d4d\u0d33 \u0d2a\u0d4d\u0d30\u0d26\u0d7c\u0d36\u0d28\u0d02 \u0d05\u0d32\u0d4d\u0d32\u0d46\u0d19\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d3f\u0d7d \u0d2a\u0d4d\u0d30\u0d38\u0d3f\u0d26\u0d4d\u0d27\u0d40\u0d15\u0d30\u0d3f\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d41\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28 \u0d24\u0d40\u0d2f\u0d24\u0d3f \u0d2e\u0d41\u0d24\u0d7d \u0d2a\u0d47\u0d31\u0d4d\u0d31\u0d7b\u0d4d\u0d31 \u0d05\u0d2a\u0d47\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d37 \u0d2b\u0d2f\u0d7d \u0d1a\u0d46\u0d2f\u0d4d\u0d2f\u0d41\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28\u0d24\u0d3f\u0d28\u0d4d 12 \u0d2e\u0d3e\u0d38\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d24\u0d46 \u0d17\u0d4d\u0d30\u0d47\u0d38\u0d4d \u0d2a\u0d3f\u0d30\u0d40\u0d21\u0d4d \u0d28\u0d7d\u0d15\u0d41\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28\u0d41. \u0d05\u0d2a\u0d47\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d37\u0d15. \u0d07\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d2f\u0d7b \u0d2a\u0d47\u0d31\u0d4d\u0d31\u0d7b\u0d4d\u0d31 \u0d28\u0d3f\u0d2f\u0d2e\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d24\u0d3f\u0d32\u0d46 \u0d38\u0d46\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d37\u0d7b 29-34 \u0d7d \u0d35\u0d3f\u0d36\u0d26\u0d2e\u0d3e\u0d2f \u0d35\u0d4d\u0d2f\u0d35\u0d38\u0d4d\u0d25\u0d15\u0d7e \u0d28\u0d7d\u0d15\u0d3f\u0d2f\u0d3f\u0d30\u0d3f\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d41\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28\u0d41.", + "A4/ML": "\u0d35\u0d4d\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d2a\u0d3e\u0d30\u0d2e\u0d41\u0d26\u0d4d\u0d30 \u0d0e\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28\u0d3e\u0d7d \u0d12\u0d30\u0d41 \u0d38\u0d4d\u0d25\u0d3e\u0d2a\u0d28\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d24\u0d3f\u0d7d \u0d28\u0d3f\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28\u0d4d \u0d09\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d2d\u0d35\u0d3f\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d41\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28 \u0d1a\u0d30\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d4d \u0d05\u0d32\u0d4d\u0d32\u0d46\u0d19\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d3f\u0d7d \u0d38\u0d47\u0d35\u0d28\u0d02 \u0d24\u0d3f\u0d30\u0d3f\u0d1a\u0d4d\u0d1a\u0d31\u0d3f\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d7b \u0d38\u0d39\u0d3e\u0d2f\u0d3f\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d41\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28 \u0d05\u0d1f\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 \u0d0e\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28\u0d3e\u0d23\u0d4d \u0d05\u0d7c\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d25\u0d2e\u0d3e\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d41\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28\u0d24\u0d4d. \u0d12\u0d30\u0d41 \u0d38\u0d02\u0d30\u0d02\u0d2d\u0d02 \u0d05\u0d35\u0d30\u0d41\u0d1f\u0d46 \u0d1a\u0d30\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d41\u0d15\u0d33\u0d4b \u0d38\u0d47\u0d35\u0d28\u0d19\u0d4d\u0d19\u0d33\u0d4b \u0d2e\u0d31\u0d4d\u0d31\u0d4d \u0d38\u0d02\u0d30\u0d02\u0d2d\u0d19\u0d4d\u0d19\u0d33\u0d3f\u0d7d \u0d28\u0d3f\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28\u0d4d \u0d35\u0d47\u0d7c\u0d24\u0d3f\u0d30\u0d3f\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d41\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28\u0d24\u0d3f\u0d28\u0d4d \u0d09\u0d2a\u0d2f\u0d4b\u0d17\u0d3f\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d41\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28 \u0d12\u0d30\u0d41 \u0d26\u0d43\u0d37\u0d4d\u0d1f\u0d3f\u0d17\u0d4b\u0d1a\u0d30\u0d2e\u0d3e\u0d2f \u0d1a\u0d3f\u0d39\u0d4d\u0d28\u0d2e\u0d4b \u0d05\u0d1f\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d2e\u0d4b \u0d06\u0d23\u0d4d \u0d07\u0d24\u0d4d . \u0d12\u0d30\u0d41 \u0d2a\u0d4d\u0d30\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d2f\u0d47\u0d15 \u0d2c\u0d4d\u0d30\u0d3e\u0d7b\u0d21\u0d4d \u0d09\u0d7d\u0d2a\u0d4d\u0d2a\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d24\u0d3f\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d31\u0d46\u0d2f\u0d4b \u0d38\u0d47\u0d35\u0d28\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d24\u0d3f\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d31\u0d46\u0d2f\u0d4b \u0d2e\u0d31\u0d4d\u0d31\u0d4a\u0d30\u0d41 \u0d2c\u0d4d\u0d30\u0d3e\u0d7b\u0d21\u0d3f\u0d7d \u0d28\u0d3f\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28\u0d4d \u0d24\u0d3f\u0d30\u0d3f\u0d1a\u0d4d\u0d1a\u0d31\u0d3f\u0d2f\u0d41\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28\u0d24\u0d3f\u0d28\u0d41\u0d02 \u0d35\u0d47\u0d7c\u0d24\u0d3f\u0d30\u0d3f\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d41\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28\u0d24\u0d3f\u0d28\u0d41\u0d02 \u0d07\u0d24\u0d4d \u0d09\u0d2a\u0d2d\u0d4b\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d24\u0d3e\u0d35\u0d3f\u0d28\u0d46 \u0d38\u0d39\u0d3e\u0d2f\u0d3f\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d41\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28\u0d41 (\u0d35\u0d4d\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d2a\u0d3e\u0d30 \u0d2e\u0d3e\u0d7c\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d41\u0d15\u0d33\u0d41\u0d1f\u0d46 \u0d28\u0d3f\u0d7c\u0d35\u0d1a\u0d28\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d24\u0d3f\u0d28\u0d4d, \u0d1f\u0d4d\u0d30\u0d47\u0d21\u0d4d \u0d2e\u0d3e\u0d7c\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d4d \u0d06\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d1f\u0d4d, 1999-\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d31\u0d46 \u0d38\u0d46\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d37\u0d7b 2(1)(zb) \u0d15\u0d3e\u0d23\u0d41\u0d15).", + "A17/ML": "\u0d12\u0d30\u0d41 \u0d2e\u0d3e\u0d7c\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d4d \u0d07\u0d24\u0d3f\u0d28\u0d15\u0d02 \u0d2e\u0d31\u0d4d\u0d31\u0d4a\u0d30\u0d3e\u0d7e \u0d30\u0d1c\u0d3f\u0d38\u0d4d\u0d31\u0d4d\u0d31\u0d7c \u0d1a\u0d46\u0d2f\u0d4d\u0d24\u0d3f\u0d1f\u0d4d\u0d1f\u0d41\u0d23\u0d4d\u0d1f\u0d4b \u0d0e\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28\u0d4d \u0d05\u0d31\u0d3f\u0d2f\u0d41\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28\u0d24\u0d4d, \u0d12\u0d30\u0d41 \u0d26\u0d4d\u0d30\u0d41\u0d24 \u0d35\u0d4d\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d2a\u0d3e\u0d30\u0d2e\u0d41\u0d26\u0d4d\u0d30 \u0d24\u0d3f\u0d30\u0d2f\u0d7d \u0d28\u0d1f\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d24\u0d3f \u0d1a\u0d46\u0d2f\u0d4d\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d35\u0d41\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28\u0d24\u0d3e\u0d23\u0d4d. \u0d07\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d31\u0d32\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d1a\u0d4d\u0d35\u0d7d \u0d2a\u0d4d\u0d30\u0d4b\u0d2a\u0d4d\u0d2a\u0d7c\u0d1f\u0d4d\u0d1f\u0d3f \u0d07\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d2f \u0d35\u0d46\u0d2c\u0d4d\u0d38\u0d48\u0d31\u0d4d\u0d31\u0d4d \u0d38\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d26\u0d7c\u0d36\u0d3f\u0d1a\u0d4d\u0d1a\u0d4d \u0d07\u0d24\u0d4d \u0d13\u0d7a\u0d32\u0d48\u0d28\u0d3e\u0d2f\u0d3f \u0d1a\u0d46\u0d2f\u0d4d\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d02 . \u0d15\u0d42\u0d1f\u0d3e\u0d24\u0d46, \u0d12\u0d30\u0d47 \u0d2e\u0d47\u0d16\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3f\u0d32\u0d46 \u0d2e\u0d31\u0d4d\u0d31\u0d4d \u0d2c\u0d3f\u0d38\u0d3f\u0d28\u0d38\u0d4d\u0d38\u0d41\u0d15\u0d33\u0d41\u0d1f\u0d46\u0d2f\u0d4b \u0d38\u0d47\u0d35\u0d28\u0d19\u0d4d\u0d19\u0d33\u0d41\u0d1f\u0d46\u0d2f\u0d4b \u0d2e\u0d3e\u0d7c\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d3f\u0d28\u0d4d \u0d38\u0d2e\u0d3e\u0d28\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d4d\u0d32 \u0d05\u0d35\u0d30\u0d41\u0d1f\u0d46 \u0d2e\u0d3e\u0d7c\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d4d \u0d0e\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28\u0d4d \u0d09\u0d31\u0d2a\u0d4d\u0d2a\u0d41\u0d35\u0d30\u0d41\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d24\u0d3e\u0d7b \u0d36\u0d4d\u0d30\u0d2e\u0d3f\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d41\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28\u0d24\u0d41\u0d02 \u0d09\u0d1a\u0d3f\u0d24\u0d2e\u0d3e\u0d23\u0d4d. \u0d07\u0d24\u0d4d '\u0d2e\u0d3e\u0d7c\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d31\u0d4d\u0d31\u0d4d \u0d38\u0d46\u0d7c\u0d1a\u0d4d\u0d1a\u0d4d' (market search) \u0d0e\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28\u0d31\u0d3f\u0d2f\u0d2a\u0d4d\u0d2a\u0d46\u0d1f\u0d41\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28\u0d41, \u0d15\u0d42\u0d1f\u0d3e\u0d24\u0d46 \u0d30\u0d1c\u0d3f\u0d38\u0d4d\u0d31\u0d4d\u0d31\u0d7c \u0d1a\u0d46\u0d2f\u0d4d\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d24 \u0d0f\u0d24\u0d46\u0d19\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d3f\u0d32\u0d41\u0d02 \u0d35\u0d4d\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d2a\u0d3e\u0d30\u0d2e\u0d41\u0d26\u0d4d\u0d30 \u0d09\u0d1f\u0d2e\u0d15\u0d7e \u0d2d\u0d3e\u0d35\u0d3f\u0d2f\u0d3f\u0d7d \u0d2e\u0d3e\u0d7c\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d4d \u0d39\u0d4b\u0d7e\u0d21\u0d7c\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d46\u0d24\u0d3f\u0d30\u0d46 \u0d2a\u0d3e\u0d38\u0d4d\u0d38\u0d3f\u0d02\u0d17\u0d4d \u0d13\u0d2b\u0d4d \u0d15\u0d4d\u0d32\u0d46\u0d2f\u0d3f\u0d02 \u0d06\u0d30\u0d02\u0d2d\u0d3f\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d41\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28\u0d24\u0d4d \u0d24\u0d1f\u0d2f\u0d41\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28\u0d24\u0d3f\u0d28\u0d3e\u0d23\u0d4d \u0d07\u0d24\u0d4d \u0d1a\u0d46\u0d2f\u0d4d\u0d2f\u0d41\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28\u0d24\u0d4d.", + "A23/ML": "\u0d07\u0d32\u0d4d\u0d32, \u0d2a\u0d15\u0d7c\u0d2a\u0d4d\u0d2a\u0d35\u0d15\u0d3e\u0d36\u0d02 \u0d06\u0d36\u0d2f\u0d2a\u0d4d\u0d30\u0d15\u0d3e\u0d36\u0d28 \u0d30\u0d40\u0d24\u0d3f(Expression) \u0d2e\u0d3e\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d30\u0d2e\u0d47 \u0d38\u0d02\u0d30\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d37\u0d3f\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d42, \u0d06\u0d36\u0d2f\u0d19\u0d4d\u0d19\u0d33\u0d46\u0d2f\u0d32\u0d4d\u0d32. \u0d07\u0d24\u0d3f\u0d28\u0d7c\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d25\u0d02 \u0d38\u0d4d\u0d30\u0d37\u0d4d\u0d1f\u0d3e\u0d35\u0d4d \u0d24\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d31\u0d46 \u0d06\u0d36\u0d2f\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d24\u0d46 \u0d12\u0d30\u0d41 \u0d38\u0d43\u0d37\u0d4d\u0d1f\u0d3f\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d2f\u0d3f \u0d1a\u0d41\u0d35\u0d1f\u0d46 \u0d28\u0d3f\u0d7c\u0d35\u0d1a\u0d3f\u0d1a\u0d4d\u0d1a\u0d3e\u0d7d \u0d2e\u0d3e\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d30\u0d2e\u0d47 \u0d05\u0d24\u0d3f\u0d28\u0d46 \u0d38\u0d02\u0d30\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d37\u0d3f\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d47\u0d23\u0d4d\u0d1f\u0d24\u0d4d \u0d09\u0d33\u0d4d\u0d33\u0d42 \u0d0e\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28\u0d3e\u0d23\u0d4d. \u0d15\u0d47\u0d35\u0d32\u0d02 \u0d12\u0d30\u0d41 \u0d06\u0d36\u0d2f\u0d02 \u0d2e\u0d3e\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d30\u0d02 \u0d2a\u0d4b\u0d30\u0d3e, \u0d2a\u0d4d\u0d30\u0d3e\u0d35\u0d7c\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d24\u0d3f\u0d15\u0d2e\u0d3e\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d3e\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d24\u0d2a\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d37\u0d02, \u0d06\u0d36\u0d2f\u0d02 \u0d38\u0d02\u0d30\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d37\u0d3f\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d3e\u0d7b \u0d15\u0d34\u0d3f\u0d2f\u0d3f\u0d32\u0d4d\u0d32. \u0d09\u0d26\u0d3e: \u0d12\u0d30\u0d41 \u0d2e\u0d3f\u0d15\u0d1a\u0d4d\u0d1a \u0d28\u0d4b\u0d35\u0d32\u0d3f\u0d28\u0d46\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d41\u0d31\u0d3f\u0d1a\u0d4d\u0d1a\u0d4d \u0d28\u0d3f\u0d19\u0d4d\u0d19\u0d7e\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d4d \u0d12\u0d30\u0d41 \u0d06\u0d36\u0d2f\u0d02 \u0d09\u0d23\u0d4d\u0d1f\u0d3e\u0d2f\u0d3f\u0d30\u0d3f\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d3e\u0d02, \u0d2a\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d37\u0d47 \u0d05\u0d24\u0d4d \u0d12\u0d30\u0d41 \u0d2a\u0d41\u0d38\u0d4d\u0d24\u0d15\u0d2e\u0d3e\u0d2f\u0d3f \u0d0e\u0d34\u0d41\u0d24\u0d41\u0d2e\u0d4d\u0d2a\u0d4b\u0d7e \u0d2e\u0d3e\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d30\u0d2e\u0d47 \u0d05\u0d24\u0d3f\u0d28\u0d4d \u0d2a\u0d15\u0d7c\u0d2a\u0d4d\u0d2a\u0d35\u0d15\u0d3e\u0d36 \u0d2a\u0d30\u0d3f\u0d30\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d37 \u0d32\u0d2d\u0d3f\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d42.", + "A39/ML": "\u0d0f\u0d24\u0d46\u0d19\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d3f\u0d32\u0d41\u0d02 \u0d35\u0d4d\u0d2f\u0d35\u0d38\u0d3e\u0d2f\u0d3f\u0d15 \u0d2a\u0d4d\u0d30\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d30\u0d3f\u0d2f\u0d2f\u0d3f\u0d32\u0d42\u0d1f\u0d46 \u0d0f\u0d24\u0d46\u0d19\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d3f\u0d32\u0d41\u0d02 \u0d32\u0d47\u0d16\u0d28\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d24\u0d3f\u0d7d (\u0d05\u0d24\u0d4d 2D \u0d05\u0d32\u0d4d\u0d32\u0d46\u0d19\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d3f\u0d7d 3D \u0d06\u0d15\u0d1f\u0d4d\u0d1f\u0d46) \u0d09\u0d2a\u0d2f\u0d4b\u0d17\u0d3f\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d41\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28 \u0d06\u0d15\u0d43\u0d24\u0d3f, \u0d15\u0d4b\u0d7a\u0d2b\u0d3f\u0d17\u0d31\u0d47\u0d37\u0d7b, \u0d2a\u0d3e\u0d31\u0d4d\u0d31\u0d47\u0d7a, \u0d05\u0d32\u0d19\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d3e\u0d30\u0d02, \u0d32\u0d48\u0d28\u0d41\u0d15\u0d33\u0d41\u0d1f\u0d46 \u0d18\u0d1f\u0d28 \u0d05\u0d32\u0d4d\u0d32\u0d46\u0d19\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d3f\u0d7d \u0d28\u0d3f\u0d31\u0d02 \u0d05\u0d32\u0d4d\u0d32\u0d46\u0d19\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d3f\u0d7d \u0d15\u0d4b\u0d2e\u0d4d\u0d2a\u0d3f\u0d28\u0d47\u0d37\u0d7b \u0d0e\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28\u0d3f\u0d35\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d23\u0d4d \u0d21\u0d3f\u0d38\u0d48\u0d7b. \u0d21\u0d3f\u0d38\u0d48\u0d28\u0d41\u0d15\u0d7e \u0d06\u0d15\u0d7c\u0d37\u0d23\u0d02 \u0d09\u0d26\u0d4d\u0d26\u0d47\u0d36\u0d3f\u0d1a\u0d4d\u0d1a\u0d41\u0d33\u0d4d\u0d33\u0d24\u0d3e\u0d23\u0d4d, \u0d09\u0d7d\u0d2a\u0d4d\u0d2a\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d24\u0d3f\u0d7b\u0d4d\u0d31\u0d46 \u0d2a\u0d4d\u0d30\u0d35\u0d7c\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d24\u0d28\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d37\u0d2e\u0d24 \u0d15\u0d42\u0d1f\u0d4d\u0d1f\u0d3e\u0d7b \u0d35\u0d47\u0d23\u0d4d\u0d1f\u0d3f\u0d2f\u0d41\u0d33\u0d4d\u0d33\u0d24\u0d32\u0d4d\u0d32. ( \u0d21\u0d3f\u0d38\u0d48\u0d7b \u0d06\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d31\u0d4d\u0d31 2000, \u0d38\u0d46\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d37\u0d7b 2(d) \u0d15\u0d3e\u0d23\u0d41\u0d15) \u0d09\u0d26\u0d3e\u0d39\u0d30\u0d23\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d24\u0d3f\u0d28\u0d4d: \u0d12\u0d30\u0d41 \u0d2a\u0d4d\u0d30\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d2f\u0d47\u0d15 \u0d06\u0d2a\u0d4d\u0d2a\u0d4d\u0d32\u0d3f\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d4d/\u0d2e\u0d4b\u0d1f\u0d4d\u0d1f\u0d3f\u0d2b\u0d4d \u0d05\u0d24\u0d3f\u0d7b\u0d4d\u0d31\u0d46 \u0d37\u0d7c\u0d1f\u0d4d\u0d1f\u0d41\u0d15\u0d33\u0d41\u0d1f\u0d46 \u0d12\u0d30\u0d41 \u0d36\u0d4d\u0d30\u0d47\u0d23\u0d3f\u0d2f\u0d3f\u0d7d \u0d2a\u0d4d\u0d30\u0d2f\u0d4b\u0d17\u0d3f\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d41\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28 \u0d12\u0d30\u0d41 \u0d2c\u0d3f\u0d38\u0d3f\u0d28\u0d38\u0d4d\u0d38\u0d3f\u0d28\u0d4d, \u0d21\u0d3f\u0d38\u0d48\u0d28\u0d3f\u0d28\u0d4d \u0d15\u0d40\u0d34\u0d3f\u0d7d \u0d07\u0d24\u0d4d \u0d2a\u0d30\u0d3f\u0d30\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d37\u0d3f\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d3e\u0d28\u0d3e\u0d15\u0d41\u0d02. \u0d09\u0d7d\u0d2a\u0d4d\u0d2a\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d24\u0d3f\u0d7b\u0d4d\u0d31\u0d46 \u0d05\u0d24\u0d3e\u0d2f\u0d24\u0d4d \u0d37\u0d7c\u0d1f\u0d4d\u0d1f\u0d3f\u0d7b\u0d4d\u0d31\u0d46 \u0d35\u0d3f\u0d37\u0d4d\u0d35\u0d7d \u0d05\u0d2a\u0d4d\u0d2a\u0d40\u0d7d \u0d35\u0d7c\u0d27\u0d3f\u0d2a\u0d4d\u0d2a\u0d3f\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d41\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28\u0d24\u0d3f\u0d28\u0d3e\u0d23\u0d4d \u0d2e\u0d4b\u0d1f\u0d4d\u0d1f\u0d3f\u0d2b\u0d4d \u0d09\u0d33\u0d4d\u0d33\u0d24\u0d4d.", + "A33/MR": "\u0939\u094b\u092f, \u092a\u0923 \u0939\u0938\u094d\u0924\u093e\u0902\u0924\u0930\u093f\u0924 \u0932\u093e\u092f\u0938\u0928\u094d\u0938 \u092e\u0927\u094d\u092f\u0947 \u0926\u0947\u0923\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0924 \u0906\u0932\u0947\u0932\u093e \u0939\u0915\u094d\u0915 \u092e\u0930\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0926\u093f\u0924 \u0906\u0939\u0947. \u0932\u093e\u092f\u0938\u0928\u094d\u0938 \u0926\u094d\u0935\u093e\u0930\u0947, \u0915\u0949\u092a\u0940\u0930\u093e\u0907\u091f\u091a\u093e \u092e\u093e\u0932\u0915 \u092a\u0930\u0935\u093e\u0928\u093e\u0927\u093e\u0930\u0915\u093e\u0932\u093e \u0915\u094b\u0923\u0924\u0947\u0939\u0940 \u0909\u0932\u094d\u0932\u0902\u0918\u0928 \u0915\u0947\u0932\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0936\u093f\u0935\u093e\u092f \u0924\u094d\u092f\u093e\u091a\u0947 \u0915\u093e\u0930\u094d\u092f \u0935\u093e\u092a\u0930\u0923\u094d\u092f\u093e\u091a\u093e \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930 \u0926\u0947\u0924\u094b. \u092d\u093e\u0930\u0924\u093e\u0924, \u0939\u093e \u0932\u093e\u092f\u0938\u0928\u094d\u0938 \u0915\u0947 \u0935\u0933 \u0915\u0949\u092a\u0940\u0930\u093e\u0907\u091f \u092e\u093e\u0932\u0915\u093e\u091a\u094d\u092f\u093e \u0938\u094d\u0935\u093e\u0915\u094d\u0937\u0930\u094d\u200d\u092f\u093e\u0935\u0930 \u0915\u093f\u0902\u0935\u093e \u0924\u094d\u092f\u093e\u091a\u094d\u092f\u093e \u092f\u094b\u0917\u094d\u092f \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u0943 \u0924 \u090f\u091c\u0902\u091f\u0926\u094d\u0935\u093e\u0930\u0947 \u092e\u093f\u0933\u0942 \u0936\u0915\u0924\u094b.", + "A41/MR": "\u0921\u093f\u091d\u093e\u0907\u0928\u091a\u0940 \u0928\u094b\u0902\u0926\u0923\u0940 \u0921\u093f\u091d\u093e\u0907\u0928\u091a\u094d\u092f\u093e \u0928\u093f\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e\u0924\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0938, \u092c\u0928\u093e\u0935\u091f \u092c\u0928\u0935\u093f\u0923\u0947 \u0906\u0923\u093f \u0924\u094d\u092f\u093e\u091a\u094d\u092f\u093e \u0921\u093f\u091d\u093e\u0907\u0928\u091a\u0940 \u0928\u0915\u094d\u0915\u0932 \u0915\u0930\u0923\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092a\u093e\u0938\u0942\u0928 \u0938\u0902\u0930\u0915\u094d\u0937\u0923 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0926\u093e\u0928 \u0915\u0930\u0924\u0947. \u092f\u093e\u0935\u094d\u092f\u0924\u093f\u0930\u093f\u0915\u094d\u0924, \u0907\u0924\u094d\u0924\u0930\u093e\u0902\u0928\u0940 \u0921\u093f\u091d\u093e\u0907\u0928\u091a\u093e \u0935\u093e\u092a\u0930 \u0915\u0947\u0932\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0938, \u0928\u093f\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e\u0924\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0938 \u092f\u094b\u0917\u094d\u092f \u092e\u094b\u092c\u0926\u0932\u093e \u092e\u093f\u0933\u0942 \u0936\u0915\u0924\u094b. \u0928\u094b\u0902\u0926\u0923\u0940\u0915\u0943 \u0924 \u0921\u093f\u091d\u093e\u0907\u0928 \u092e\u093e\u0932\u0915 \u0921\u093f\u091d\u093e\u0907\u0928 \u0909\u0932\u094d\u0932\u0902\u0918\u0928 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0915\u0930\u0923\u0940 \u0915\u093e\u092f\u0926\u0947\u0936\u0940\u0930 \u0915\u093e\u0930\u0935\u093e\u0908 \u0926\u0947\u0916\u0940\u0932 \u0915\u0930\u0942 \u0936\u0915\u0924\u093e. \u0915\u0949\u092a\u0940\u0930\u093e\u0907\u091f \u0915\u093e\u092f\u0926\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0928\u0941\u0938\u093e\u0930 \u091c\u0947 \u0915\u0932\u093e\u0924\u094d\u092e\u0915 \u0915\u093e\u092e (Artistic Work) \u0906\u0939\u0947 \u0924\u0947 \u0921\u093f\u091d\u093e\u0907\u0928 \u0905\u0938\u0942 \u0936\u0915\u0924 \u0928\u093e\u0939\u0940. \u091f\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0921\u092e\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0915 \u0915\u093e\u092f\u0926\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0928\u0941\u0938\u093e\u0930 \u091c\u0947 \u091f\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0921\u092e\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0915 \u0906\u0939\u0947 \u0924\u0947\u0939\u0940 \u0921\u093f\u091d\u093e\u0907\u0928 \u0905\u0938\u0942 \u0936\u0915\u0924 \u0928\u093e\u0939\u0940 \u092e\u094d\u0939\u0923\u0942\u0928\u091a \u0924\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0902\u0928\u093e \u0921\u093f\u091d\u093e\u0907\u0928 \u092e\u094d\u0939\u0923\u0942\u0928 \u0928\u094b\u0902\u0926\u0923\u0940 \u0915\u0930\u0924\u093e \u092f\u0947\u0923\u093e\u0930 \u0928\u093e\u0939\u0940. (\u0921\u093f\u091d\u093e\u0908\u0928 \u0915\u093e\u092f\u0926\u093e, \u0968\u0966\u0966\u0966 \u091a\u0947 \u0915\u0932\u092e \u0968 (\u0921\u0940) \u092a\u0939\u093e)", + "A32/MR": "\u092c\u094d\u0930\u092c\u094d\u0930\u0949\u0921\u0915\u093e\u0938\u094d\u091f\u0930\u094d\u0938\u0935\u0930 \u0924\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0902\u091a\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0906\u0939\u0947\u0924 \u092a\u0941\u0928\u0930\u0941\u0924\u094d\u092a\u093e\u0926\u0928\u0935\u093f\u0936\u0947\u0937 \u0939\u0915\u094d\u0915\" (Broadcast Reproduction Rights) \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u093e\u0902\u0935\u0930 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930. \u092c\u094d\u0930\u0949\u0921\u0915\u093e\u0938\u094d\u091f\u0930\u091a\u094d\u092f\u093e: \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0930\u0923\u093e\u091a\u0947 \u092a\u0930\u0935\u093e\u0928\u0917\u0940\u0936\u093f\u0935\u093e\u092f\u0916\u093e\u0932\u0940\u0932 \u0917\u094b\u0937\u094d\u091f\u0940 \u0915\u0930\u0941 \u0936\u0915\u0924 \u0928\u093e\u0939\u0940\u0924 \u092a\u0941\u0928\u094d\u0939\u093e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0930\u0923 \u0915\u0930\u0923\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0938\u093e\u0920\u0940.\u092a\u0948\u0936\u093e\u0938\u093e\u0920\u0940 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0930\u0923 \u0938\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0935\u091c\u0928\u093f\u0915 \u0915\u0930\u0923\u0947. \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0930\u0923\u093e\u091a\u0947 \u0911\u0921\u093f\u0913 \u0935\u094d\u0939\u093f\u091c\u094d\u092f\u0941\u0905\u0932 \u0930\u0947\u0915\u0949\u0930\u094d\u0921\u093f\u0902\u0917 \u0924\u092f\u093e\u0930 \u0915\u0930\u0923\u0947\u0939\u0947. \u0905\u0936\u0940 \u0930\u0947\u0915\u0949\u0930\u094d\u0921\u093f\u0902\u0917 \u092d\u093e\u0921\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0928\u0947 \u0926\u0947\u0923\u0947 \u0915\u093f\u0902\u0935\u093e \u0935\u093f\u0915\u094d\u0930\u0940 \u0915\u0930\u0923\u0947. \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0930\u0915\u093e\u091a\u093e \u0939\u093e \u0939\u0915\u094d\u0915 25 \u0935\u0930\u094d\u0937\u093e\u0902\u0938\u093e\u0920\u0940 \u0935\u0948\u0927 \u0906\u0939\u0947. (\u0915\u0949\u092a\u0940\u0930\u093e\u0907\u091f \u0915\u093e\u092f\u0926\u093e 1957 \u091a\u0947 \u0915\u0932\u092e 37 \u092a\u0939\u093e)", + "A15/MR": "\u0928\u094b\u0902\u0926\u0923\u0940\u0938\u093e\u0920\u0940 \u0905\u0930\u094d\u091c \u0915\u0930\u0923\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092a\u0942\u0930\u094d\u0935\u0940 \u091f\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0921\u092e\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0915 \u0935\u093e\u092a\u0930\u0923\u0947 \u0906\u0935\u0936\u094d\u092f\u0915 \u0928\u093e\u0939\u0940. \u0905\u0930\u094d\u091c\"\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u094d\u0924\u093e\u0935\u093f\u0924\" \u091f\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0921\u092e\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0915 \u0905\u0902\u0924\u0930\u094d\u0917\u0924 \u0926\u093e\u0916\u0932 \u0915\u0947\u0932\u0947 \u091c\u093e\u090a \u0936\u0915\u0924\u093e\u0924. \u0906\u092a\u0923 \u092b\u0915\u094d\u0924 \u092d\u0935\u093f\u0937\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0924 \u091f\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0921\u092e\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0915\u091a\u093e \u0935\u093e\u092a\u0930 \u0938\u093f\u0926\u094d\u0927 \u0915\u0930\u0923\u0947 \u0906\u0935\u0936\u094d\u092f\u0915 \u0906\u0939\u0947 .", + "A31/MR": "\u092a\u0930\u092b\u0949\u0930\u094d\u092e\u0930\u094d\u0938' \u092e\u0927\u094d\u092f\u0947 \u0905\u092d\u093f\u0928\u0947\u0924\u0947, \u0917\u093e\u092f\u0915, \u0938\u0902\u0917\u0940\u0924\u0915\u093e\u0930, \u0928\u0930\u094d\u0924\u0915, \u090f\u0915\u094d\u0930\u094b\u092c\u0945\u091f\u094d\u0938, \u0907\u0924\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0926\u0940 \u0915\u0932\u093e\u0915\u093e\u0930\u093e\u0902\u091a\u093e \u0938\u092e\u093e\u0935\u0947\u0936 \u0905\u0938\u0924\u094b. \u0939\u0947 \u0932\u094b\u0915 \u092c\u0930\u094d\u200d\u092f\u093e\u091a\u0926\u093e \u0932\u0947\u0916\u0915\u093e\u091a\u0947 \u0915\u093e\u0930\u094d\u092f \u0915\u0930\u0924\u093e\u0924. \u0905\u0936\u093e\u091a \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0947, \u090f\u0916\u093e\u0926\u094d\u092f\u093e \u0915\u0932\u093e\u0915\u093e\u0930\u093e\u0932\u093e \u0935\u093f\u0936\u093f\u0937\u094d\u091f \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930 \u0926\u093f\u0932\u0947 \u091c\u093e\u0924\u093e\u0924 \u091c\u0947 \u0932\u0947\u0916\u0915\u093e\u091a\u094d\u092f\u093e \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u093e\u0902\u092a\u0947\u0915\u094d\u0937\u093e \u092d\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0928 \u0905\u0938\u0924\u093e\u0924. \u0915\u0932\u093e\u0915\u093e\u0930\u093e\u091a\u094d\u092f\u093e \u0938\u0902\u092e\u0924\u0940\u0936\u093f\u0935\u093e\u092f \u0915\u094b\u0923\u0924\u0940\u0939\u0940 \u0935\u094d\u092f\u0915\u094d\u0924\u0940 \u092a\u0941\u0922\u0940\u0932 \u0917\u094b\u0937\u094d\u091f\u0940 \u0915\u0930\u0941 \u0936\u0915\u0924 \u0928\u093e\u0939\u0940 \u0927\u094d\u0935\u0928\u0940 \u0930\u0947\u0915\u0949\u0930\u094d\u0921\u093f\u0902\u0917 \u0915\u093f\u0902\u0935\u093e \u0915\u093e\u092e\u0917\u093f\u0930\u0940\u091a\u0947 \u0935\u094d\u0939\u093f\u091c\u094d\u092f\u0941\u0905\u0932 \u0930\u0947\u0915\u0949\u0930\u094d\u0921\u093f\u0902\u0917 \u092a\u0941\u0928\u0930\u0941\u0924\u094d\u092a\u093e\u0926\u093f\u0924 \u0915\u0930\u0923\u0947; \u0915\u093e\u0930\u094d\u092f\u0915\u094d\u0930\u092e \u0906\u0927\u0940\u092a\u093e\u0938\u0942\u0928\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0930\u093f\u0924 \u0915\u0947\u0932\u093e \u0917\u0947\u0932\u093e \u0935\u0917\u0933\u0924\u093e \u0932\u094b\u0915\u093e\u0902\u0915\u0921\u0947 \u0915\u093e\u0930\u094d\u092f\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0926\u0930\u094d\u0936\u0928 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0930\u093f\u0924 \u0915\u0930\u0923\u0947 \u0915\u093f\u0902\u0935\u093e \u0938\u0902\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u0923 \u0915\u0930\u0923\u0947 . \u090f\u0916\u093e\u0926\u094d\u092f\u093e \u0915\u0932\u093e\u0915\u093e\u0930\u093e\u091a\u0947 \u0939\u0915\u094d\u0915 50 \u0935\u0930\u094d\u0937\u093e\u0902\u0938\u093e\u0920\u0940 \u0935\u0948\u0927 \u0905\u0938\u0924\u093e\u0924. (\u0915\u0949\u092a\u0940\u0930\u093e\u0907\u091f \u0915\u093e\u092f\u0926\u093e 1957 \u091a\u0947 \u0915\u0932\u092e 38 \u0906\u0923\u093f 38 \u090f \u092a\u0939\u093e). \u092f\u093e\u0935\u094d\u092f\u0924\u093f\u0930\u093f\u0915\u094d\u0924, \u0915\u0932\u093e\u0915\u093e\u0930\u093e\u0932\u093e \u0924\u094d\u092f\u093e\u091a\u094d\u092f\u093e \u0905\u092d\u093f\u0928\u092f\u093e\u091a\u093e \u0915\u0932\u093e\u0915\u093e\u0930 \u092e\u094d\u0939\u0923\u0942\u0928 \u0913\u0933\u0916\u0923\u094d\u092f\u093e\u091a\u093e \u0928\u0948\u0924\u093f\u0915 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930 \u0926\u0947\u0916\u0940\u0932 \u0906\u0939\u0947. \u090f\u0916\u093e\u0926\u094d\u092f\u093e \u0915\u0932\u093e\u0915\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092e\u0941\u0933\u0947 \u0924\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0902\u091a\u0940 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0924\u093f\u0937\u094d\u0920\u093e \u0916\u0930\u093e\u092c \u0939\u094b\u0924 \u0906\u0939\u0947 \u0905\u0938\u0947 \u0924\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0902\u0928\u093e \u0935\u093e\u091f\u0924 \u0905\u0938\u0932\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0938 \u0924\u0947 \u0924\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0902\u091a\u094d\u092f\u093e \u0905\u092d\u093f\u0928\u092f\u093e\u092e\u0927\u094d\u092f\u0947 \u0939\u094b\u0923\u093e\u0930\u0947 \u092c\u0926\u0932 \u0915\u093f\u0902\u0935\u093e \u092c\u0926\u0932 \u0930\u094b\u0916\u0942 \u0936\u0915\u0924\u093e\u0924.", + "A8/OR": "\u0b1f\u0b4d\u0b30\u0b47\u0b21 \u0b2e\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b4d\u0b15 \u0b2a\u0b30\u0b47 \u0b0f\u0b39\u0b3f \u0b2a\u0b4d\u0b30\u0b24\u0b40\u0b15 \u0b2c\u0b4d\u0b5f\u0b2c\u0b39\u0b3e\u0b30 \u0b15\u0b30\u0b3f \u0b2a\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b3f\u0b2c\u0b47, \u0b2f\u0b26\u0b3f \u0b06\u0b2a\u0b23 \u0b0f\u0b39\u0b3f \u0b1f\u0b4d\u0b30\u0b47\u0b21 \u0b2e\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b4d\u0b15 \u0b2a\u0b3e\u0b07\u0b01 \u0b06\u0b2c\u0b47\u0b26\u0b28 \u0b15\u0b30\u0b3f\u0b1b\u0b28\u0b4d\u0b24\u0b3f \u0b2e\u0b3e\u0b24\u0b4d\u0b30 \u0b05\u0b26\u0b4d\u0b5f\u0b3e\u0b2c\u0b27\u0b3f \u0b2a\u0b1e\u0b4d\u0b1c\u0b40\u0b15\u0b43\u0b24 \u0b39\u0b4b\u0b07 \u0b28\u0b3e\u0b39\u0b3f\u0b01 \u0964 \u0b0f\u0b39\u0b3e \u0b1c\u0b28 \u0b38\u0b3e\u0b27\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b23\u0b19\u0b4d\u0b15 \u0b2a\u0b3e\u0b07\u0b01 \u0b0f\u0b15 \u0b2c\u0b3f\u0b1c\u0b4d\u0b1e\u0b2a\u0b4d\u0b24\u0b3f\u0b30 \u0b15\u0b3e\u0b2e \u0b15\u0b30\u0b47 \u0b06\u0b2a\u0b23\u0b19\u0b4d\u0b15 \u0b28\u0b3f\u0b30\u0b4d\u0b26\u0b4d\u0b26\u0b3f\u0b37\u0b4d\u0b1f \u0b1f\u0b4d\u0b30\u0b47\u0b21 \u0b2e\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b4d\u0b15 \u0b0f\u0b2a\u0b30\u0b47 \u0b05\u0b27\u0b3f\u0b15\u0b3e\u0b30 \u0b05\u0b1b\u0b3f \u0b13 \u0b24\u0b3e\u0b39\u0b3e \u0b2a\u0b1e\u0b4d\u0b1c\u0b40\u0b15\u0b30\u0b23 \u0b05\u0b2a\u0b47\u0b15\u0b4d\u0b37\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b47 \u0b05\u0b1b\u0b3f \u0964 \u0b2a\u0b4d\u0b30\u0b24\u0b40\u0b15 (R) \u0b2c\u0b4d\u0b5f\u0b2c\u0b39\u0b3e\u0b30 \u0b15\u0b30\u0b3f\u0b2a\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b3f\u0b2c\u0b47 \u0b2f\u0b26\u0b3f \u0b28\u0b3f\u0b30\u0b4d\u0b26\u0b4d\u0b26\u0b3f\u0b37\u0b4d\u0b1f \u0b1f\u0b4d\u0b30\u0b47\u0b21 \u0b2e\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b4d\u0b15 \u0b2c\u0b3e \u0b38\u0b30\u0b4d\u0b2d\u0b3f\u0b38 \u0b2e\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b4d\u0b15 \u0b2a\u0b1e\u0b4d\u0b1c\u0b40\u0b15\u0b43\u0b24 \u0b15\u0b30\u0b3e\u0b2f\u0b3e\u0b07\u0b05\u0b1b\u0b3f \u0964", + "A38/OR": "Paternity \u0b05\u0b27\u0b3f\u0b15\u0b3e\u0b30 \u0b32\u0b47\u0b16\u0b15\u0b19\u0b4d\u0b15\u0b41 \u0b28\u0b3f\u0b1c\u0b30 \u0b15\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b4d\u0b2f\u0b4d\u0b5f \u0b09\u0b2a\u0b30\u0b47 \u0b38\u0b02\u0b2a\u0b42\u0b30\u0b4d\u0b23\u0b4d\u0b23 \u0b05\u0b27\u0b3f\u0b15\u0b3e\u0b30 \u0b2a\u0b4d\u0b30\u0b26\u0b3e\u0b28 \u0b15\u0b30\u0b47 \u0964 \u0b2f\u0b47\u0b24\u0b47\u0b2c\u0b47\u0b33\u0b47 \u0b38\u0b3e\u0b2e\u0b17\u0b4d\u0b30\u0b40\u0b15 \u0b05\u0b27\u0b3f\u0b15\u0b3e\u0b30 \u0b32\u0b47\u0b16\u0b15\u0b19\u0b4d\u0b15\u0b41 \u0b24\u0b3e\u0b19\u0b4d\u0b15\u0b30 \u0b15\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b4d\u0b2f\u0b4d\u0b5f\u0b30 \u0b2c\u0b3f\u0b15\u0b43\u0b24\u0b3f \u0b15\u0b30\u0b23, \u0b09\u0b32\u0b19\u0b4d\u0b18\u0b28 \u0b15\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b4d\u0b2f\u0b4d\u0b5f \u0b2f\u0b3e\u0b39\u0b3e \u0b24\u0b3e\u0b19\u0b4d\u0b15\u0b30 \u0b38\u0b41\u0b16\u0b4d\u0b5f\u0b3e\u0b24\u0b3f\u0b15\u0b41 \u0b28\u0b37\u0b4d\u0b1f \u0b15\u0b30\u0b41\u0b25\u0b3f\u0b2c \u0b24\u0b47\u0b2c\u0b47 \u0b38\u0b47 \u0b0f\u0b39\u0b3e \u0b2c\u0b3f\u0b30\u0b41\u0b26\u0b4d\u0b27\u0b30\u0b47 \u0b05\u0b2d\u0b3f\u0b2f\u0b4b\u0b17 \u0b15\u0b30\u0b3f \u0b2a\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b3f\u0b2c\u0b47 \u0964 \u0b32\u0b47\u0b16\u0b15\u0b19\u0b4d\u0b15 \u0b28\u0b48\u0b24\u0b3f\u0b15 \u0b05\u0b27\u0b3f\u0b15\u0b3e\u0b30 \u0b24\u0b3e\u0b19\u0b4d\u0b15\u0b30 \u0b15\u0b2a\u0b3f \u0b30\u0b3e\u0b07\u0b1f \u0b05\u0b27\u0b3f\u0b15\u0b3e\u0b30 \u0b20\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b41 \u0b38\u0b4d\u0b35\u0b24\u0b28\u0b4d\u0b24\u0b4d\u0b30 \u0b0f\u0b2c\u0b02 \u0b15\u0b2a\u0b3f \u0b30\u0b3e\u0b07\u0b1f \u0b15\u0b32\u0b3e \u0b2a\u0b30\u0b47 \u0b2c\u0b3f \u0b32\u0b47\u0b16\u0b15\u0b19\u0b4d\u0b15 \u0b1c\u0b48\u0b24\u0b3f\u0b15 \u0b05\u0b27\u0b3f\u0b15\u0b3e\u0b30 \u0b24\u0b3e\u0b19\u0b4d\u0b15 \u0b2a\u0b3e\u0b16\u0b30\u0b47 \u0b30\u0b39\u0b3f\u0b25\u0b3e\u0b0f \u0964 (\u0b15\u0b2a\u0b3f \u0b30\u0b3e\u0b07\u0b1f \u0b06\u0b15\u0b4d\u0b1f , 1957 \u0b30 \u0b27\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b3e 57 - \u0b16\u0b26\u0b47\u0b16\u0b28\u0b4d\u0b24\u0b41 )\u0964", + "A43/OR": "\u0b2f\u0b26\u0b3f \u0b06\u0b2a\u0b23\u0b19\u0b4d\u0b15 \u0b15\u0b33\u0b3e\u0b24\u0b4d\u0b2e\u0b15 \u0b15\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b4d\u0b2f\u0b4d\u0b5f \u0b1f\u0b3f 50 \u0b1f\u0b3f\u0b30\u0b41 \u0b05\u0b27\u0b3f\u0b15\u0b3e \u0b28\u0b2e\u0b41\u0b28\u0b3e \u0b30\u0b47 \u0b2a\u0b4d\u0b30\u0b5f\u0b4b\u0b17 \u0b15\u0b30\u0b3e\u0b2f\u0b3e\u0b0f,\u0b24\u0b47\u0b2c\u0b47 \u0b0f\u0b39\u0b3e \u0b15\u0b47\u0b2c\u0b33 \u0b21\u0b3f\u0b1c\u0b3e\u0b07\u0b28 \u0b2a\u0b1e\u0b4d\u0b1c\u0b40\u0b15\u0b30\u0b23 \u0b2a\u0b3e\u0b07\u0b01 \u0b05\u0b2f\u0b4b\u0b17\u0b4d\u0b5f \u0b39\u0b47\u0b2c \u0b28\u0b3e\u0b39\u0b3f\u0b01 \u0b24\u0b3e\u0b39\u0b3e \u0b38\u0b39 \u0b15\u0b2a\u0b3f \u0b30\u0b3e\u0b07\u0b1f \u0b38\u0b41\u0b30\u0b15\u0b4d\u0b37\u0b3e \u0b2e\u0b27\u0b4d\u0b5f \u0b39\u0b30\u0b3e\u0b07\u0b2c \u0964 \u0b0f\u0b39\u0b3e \u0b26\u0b4d\u0b35\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b3e \u0b06\u0b2a\u0b23\u0b19\u0b4d\u0b15 \u0b15\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b4d\u0b2f\u0b4d\u0b5f\u0b1f\u0b3f \u0b09\u0b2d\u0b5f \u0b06\u0b07\u0b28 \u0b26\u0b4d\u0b35\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b3e \u0b38\u0b41\u0b30\u0b15\u0b4d\u0b37\u0b3e\u0b39\u0b40\u0b28 \u0b39\u0b47\u0b2c \u0964 (\u0b15\u0b2a\u0b3f \u0b30\u0b3e\u0b07\u0b1f \u0b06\u0b15\u0b4d\u0b1f , 1957 \u0b30 \u0b27\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b3e 15 \u0b26\u0b47\u0b16\u0b28\u0b4d\u0b24\u0b41 )\u0964", + "A30/OR": "\u0b38\u0b3e\u0b27\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b23\u0b24\u0b03 \u0b15\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b4d\u0b2f\u0b4d\u0b5f\u0b30 \u0b38\u0b4d\u0b30\u0b37\u0b4d\u0b1f\u0b3e \u0b15\u0b3f\u0b2e\u0b4d\u0b2c\u0b3e \u0b32\u0b47\u0b16\u0b15\u0b19\u0b4d\u0b15\u0b30 \u0b24\u0b3e\u0b19\u0b4d\u0b15 \u0b15\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b4d\u0b2f\u0b4d\u0b5f \u0b09\u0b2a\u0b30\u0b47 \u0b2e\u0b3e\u0b32\u0b3f\u0b15\u0b3e\u0b28\u0b3e \u0b25\u0b3e\u0b0f \u0964 \u0b2e\u0b3e\u0b24\u0b4d\u0b30 \u0b15\u0b47\u0b24\u0b47\u0b15 \u0b28\u0b3f\u0b30\u0b4d\u0b26\u0b4d\u0b26\u0b3f\u0b37\u0b4d\u0b1f \u0b38\u0b4d\u0b25\u0b33\u0b30\u0b47 \u0b2c\u0b4d\u0b5f\u0b24\u0b3f\u0b15\u0b4d\u0b30\u0b2e \u0b30\u0b39\u0b3f\u0b05\u0b1b\u0b3f \u0964 \u0b2f\u0b3e\u0b39\u0b3e \u0b15\u0b2a\u0b3f \u0b30\u0b3e\u0b07\u0b1f \u0b06\u0b15\u0b4d\u0b1f , 1957 \u0b30 \u0b27\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b3e 17\u0b30\u0b47 \u0b2c\u0b30\u0b4d\u0b23\u0b4d\u0b23\u0b3f\u0b24 \u0964 \u0b18\u0b4b\u0b1f\u0b3f\u0b0f \u0b38\u0b3e\u0b27\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b23 \u0b2c\u0b4d\u0b5f\u0b24\u0b3f\u0b15\u0b4d\u0b30\u0b2e, \u0b2f\u0b26\u0b3f \u0b32\u0b47\u0b16\u0b15 \u0b15\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b4d\u0b2f\u0b4d\u0b5f", + "A55/OR": "\u0b2a\u0b4d\u0b5f\u0b3e\u0b1f\u0b47\u0b23\u0b4d\u0b1f \u0b06\u0b2c\u0b47\u0b26\u0b28 \u0b24\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b3f\u0b16 \u0b20\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b41 20\u0b2c\u0b30\u0b4d\u0b37 \u0b2a\u0b30\u0b4d\u0b2f\u0b4d\u0b5f\u0b28\u0b4d\u0b24 \u0b2a\u0b4d\u0b5f\u0b3e\u0b1f\u0b47\u0b23\u0b4d\u0b1f \u0b05\u0b27\u0b3f\u0b15\u0b3e\u0b30 \u0b2e\u0b1e\u0b4d\u0b1c\u0b41\u0b30 \u0b39\u0b4b\u0b07\u0b25\u0b3e\u0b0f \u0964 \u0b24\u0b25\u0b3e\u0b2a\u0b3f \u0b2a\u0b4d\u0b5f\u0b3e\u0b1f\u0b47\u0b23\u0b4d\u0b1f \u0b06\u0b2c\u0b47\u0b26\u0b28 \u0b2a\u0b4d\u0b5f\u0b3e\u0b1f\u0b47\u0b23\u0b4d\u0b1f \u0b15\u0b4b\u0b05\u0b2a\u0b30\u0b47\u0b38\u0b28 \u0b38\u0b28\u0b4d\u0b27\u0b3f (patent cooperation treaty) \u0b05\u0b27\u0b3f\u0b28\u0b30\u0b47 \u0b15\u0b30\u0b3e\u0b17\u0b32\u0b47 \u0b0f\u0b39\u0b3e\u0b30 \u0b05\u0b2c\u0b27\u0b3f \u0b06\u0b28\u0b4d\u0b24\u0b30\u0b4d\u0b1c\u0b3e\u0b24\u0b3f\u0b15 \u0b2a\u0b4d\u0b5f\u0b3e\u0b1f\u0b47\u0b23\u0b4d\u0b1f \u0b26\u0b30\u0b16\u0b3e\u0b38\u0b4d\u0b24\u0b30 \u0b06\u0b2c\u0b47\u0b26\u0b28 \u0b24\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b3f\u0b16 \u0b20\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b41 20 \u0b2c\u0b30\u0b4d\u0b37 \u0b2a\u0b30\u0b4d\u0b2f\u0b4d\u0b5f\u0b28\u0b4d\u0b24 \u0b39\u0b47\u0b2c \u0964 (\u0b2a\u0b4d\u0b5f\u0b3e\u0b1f\u0b47\u0b23\u0b4d\u0b1f \u0b06\u0b07\u0b28, 1970 \u0b30 \u0b27\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b3e 53 \u0b26\u0b47\u0b16\u0b28\u0b4d\u0b24\u0b41 )\u0964", + "A15/PA": "\u0a30\u0a1c\u0a3f\u0a38\u0a1f\u0a4d\u0a30\u0a47\u0a38\u0a3c\u0a28 \u0a32\u0a08 \u0a05\u0a30\u0a1c\u0a3c\u0a40 \u0a26\u0a47\u0a23 \u0a24\u0a4b\u0a02 \u0a2a\u0a39\u0a3f\u0a32\u0a3e\u0a02 \u0a1f\u0a4d\u0a30\u0a47\u0a21\u0a2e\u0a3e\u0a30\u0a15 \u0a26\u0a40 \u0a35\u0a30\u0a24\u0a4b\u0a02 \u0a15\u0a30\u0a28\u0a3e \u0a1c\u0a3c\u0a30\u0a42\u0a30\u0a40 \u0a28\u0a39\u0a40\u0a02 \u0a39\u0a48\u0964 \u0a05\u0a30\u0a1c\u0a3c\u0a40 \"\u0a2a\u0a4d\u0a30\u0a38\u0a24\u0a3e\u0a35\u0a3f\u0a24 \u0a35\u0a30\u0a24\u0a4b\u0a02\" \u0a26\u0a47 \u0a06\u0a27\u0a3e\u0a30 '\u0a24\u0a47 \u0a35\u0a40 \u0a26\u0a3e\u0a07\u0a30 \u0a15\u0a40\u0a24\u0a3e \u0a1c\u0a3e \u0a38\u0a15\u0a26\u0a3e \u0a39\u0a48\u0964 \u0964 \u0a24\u0a41\u0a39\u0a3e\u0a28\u0a42\u0a70 \u0a38\u0a3f\u0a30\u0a2b\u0a3c \u0a05\u0a1c\u0a3f\u0a39\u0a47 \u0a1f\u0a4d\u0a30\u0a47\u0a21\u0a2e\u0a3e\u0a30\u0a15 \u0a26\u0a40 \u0a2d\u0a35\u0a3f\u0a71\u0a16\u0a40 \u0a35\u0a30\u0a24\u0a4b\u0a02 \u0a28\u0a42\u0a70 \u0a38\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a24 \u0a15\u0a30\u0a28 \u0a26\u0a40 \u0a32\u0a4b\u0a5c \u0a39\u0a48 \u0a05\u0a24\u0a47 \u0a07\u0a39 \u0a26\u0a30\u0a38\u0a3e\u0a09\u0a23 \u0a26\u0a40 \u0a32\u0a4b\u0a5c \u0a39\u0a48 \u0a15\u0a3f \u0a07\u0a39 \u0a35\u0a30\u0a24\u0a4b\u0a02 \u0a1a\u0a70\u0a17\u0a40 \u0a2d\u0a3e\u0a35\u0a28\u0a3e \u0a28\u0a3e\u0a32 \u0a15\u0a40\u0a24\u0a40 \u0a1c\u0a3e \u0a30\u0a39\u0a40 \u0a39\u0a48.", + "A49/PA": "\u0a07\u0a71\u0a15 \u0a2a\u0a47\u0a1f\u0a48\u0a02\u0a1f \u0a07\u0a71\u0a15 \u0a27\u0a3e\u0a30\u0a15 \u0a28\u0a42\u0a70 \u0a15\u0a3e\u0a22 \u0a09\u0a71\u0a24\u0a47 \u0a26\u0a3f\u0a71\u0a24\u0a3e \u0a17\u0a3f\u0a06 \u0a07\u0a71\u0a15 \u0a35\u0a3f\u0a27\u0a3e\u0a28\u0a3f\u0a15 \u0a05\u0a27\u0a3f\u0a15\u0a3e\u0a30 \u0a39\u0a48\u0964 \u0a07\u0a39 \u0a05\u0a27\u0a3f\u0a15\u0a3e\u0a30 \u0a07\u0a71\u0a15 \u0a38\u0a40\u0a2e\u0a24 \u0a38\u0a2e\u0a47\u0a02 \u0a32\u0a08 \u0a39\u0a48\u0964 \u0a07\u0a38 \u0a2e\u0a3f\u0a06\u0a26 \u0a26\u0a47 \u0a26\u0a4c\u0a30\u0a3e\u0a28, \u0a27\u0a3e\u0a30\u0a15 \u0a06\u0a2a\u0a23\u0a40 \u0a2a\u0a47\u0a1f\u0a48\u0a02\u0a1f \u0a15\u0a40\u0a24\u0a40 \u0a15\u0a3e\u0a22 \u0a28\u0a42\u0a70 \u0a15\u0a3f\u0a38\u0a47 \u0a39\u0a4b\u0a30 \u0a35\u0a3f\u0a05\u0a15\u0a24\u0a40 \u0a26\u0a41\u0a06\u0a30\u0a3e \u0a2c\u0a3f\u0a28\u0a3e\u0a02 \u0a07\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a1c\u0a3c\u0a24 \u0a26\u0a47 \u0a35\u0a30\u0a24\u0a23, \u0a35\u0a47\u0a1a\u0a23 \u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a02 \u0a15\u0a3e\u0a2a\u0a40 \u0a15\u0a30\u0a28 \u0a24\u0a4b\u0a02 \u0a30\u0a4b\u0a15\u0a23 \u0a26\u0a3e \u0a05\u0a27\u0a3f\u0a15\u0a3e\u0a30 \u0a30\u0a71\u0a16\u0a26\u0a3e \u0a39\u0a48|", + "A25/PA": "\u0a07\u0a39 \u0a07\u0a71\u0a15 \u0a15\u0a70\u0a2e \u0a39\u0a4b (A Work): \u0a15\u0a70\u0a2e \u0a35\u0a3f\u0a71\u0a1a \u0a38\u0a3e\u0a39\u0a3f\u0a24\u0a15, \u0a28\u0a3e\u0a1f\u0a15\u0a40 \u0a38\u0a70\u0a17\u0a40\u0a24\u0a15 \u0a05\u0a24\u0a47 \u0a15\u0a32\u0a3e\u0a24\u0a2e\u0a15 \u0a30\u0a1a\u0a28\u0a3e\u0a35\u0a3e\u0a02 \u0a38\u0a3c\u0a3e\u0a2e\u0a3f\u0a32 \u0a39\u0a28 \u0964 \u0a07\u0a38 \u0a35\u0a3f\u0a71\u0a1a \u0a38\u0a3f\u0a28\u0a47 \u0a2e\u0a48\u0a1f\u0a4b\u0a17\u0a4d\u0a30\u0a3e\u0a2b\u0a3f\u0a15 \u0a2b\u0a3f\u0a32\u0a2e\u0a3e\u0a02 (cinematographic films) \u0a05\u0a24\u0a47 \u0a38\u0a3e\u0a0a\u0a02\u0a21 \u0a30\u0a3f\u0a15\u0a3e\u0a30\u0a21\u0a3f\u0a70\u0a17 (sound recording) \u0a35\u0a40 \u0a38\u0a3c\u0a3e\u0a2e\u0a32 \u0a39\u0a28\u0964 \u0a2e\u0a4c\u0a32\u0a3f\u0a15\u0a24\u0a3e (Originality) - \u0a15\u0a70\u0a2e \u0a15\u0a30\u0a26\u0a47 \u0a38\u0a2e\u0a47\u0a02 \u0a18\u0a71\u0a1f\u0a4b-\u0a18\u0a71\u0a1f \u0a15\u0a41\u0a71\u0a1d \u0a39\u0a41\u0a28\u0a30, \u0a2e\u0a3f\u0a39\u0a28\u0a24 \u0a05\u0a24\u0a47 \u0a28\u0a3f\u0a30\u0a23\u0a47 \u0a26\u0a40 \u0a35\u0a30\u0a24\u0a4b\u0a02 \u0a15\u0a40\u0a24\u0a40 \u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a23\u0a40 \u0a1a\u0a3e\u0a39\u0a40\u0a26\u0a40 \u0a39\u0a48\u0964 \u0a07\u0a38 \u0a35\u0a3f\u0a71\u0a1a \u0a15\u0a32\u0a3e\u0a24\u0a2e\u0a15 \u0a2f\u0a4b\u0a17\u0a24\u0a3e \u0a39\u0a4b \u0a38\u0a15\u0a26\u0a40 \u0a39\u0a48 \u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a02 \u0a28\u0a39\u0a40\u0a02, \u0a2a\u0a30 \u0a07\u0a39 \u0a32\u0a47\u0a16\u0a15 \u0a26\u0a40 \u0a07\u0a71\u0a15 \u0a2e\u0a4c\u0a32\u0a3f\u0a15 \u0a30\u0a1a\u0a28\u0a3e \u0a39\u0a4b\u0a23\u0a40 \u0a1a\u0a3e\u0a39\u0a40\u0a26\u0a40 \u0a39\u0a48\u0964 \u0a2b\u0a3f\u0a15\u0a38\u0a47\u0a38\u0a3c\u0a28 (Fixation) - \u0a15\u0a70\u0a2e \u0a28\u0a42\u0a70 \u0a15\u0a3f\u0a38\u0a47 \u0a2d\u0a4c\u0a24\u0a3f\u0a15 \u0a30\u0a42\u0a2a \u0a35\u0a3f\u0a71\u0a1a \u0a28\u0a3f\u0a38\u0a3c\u0a1a\u0a3f\u0a24 \u0a15\u0a40\u0a24\u0a3e \u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a23\u0a3e \u0a1a\u0a3e\u0a39\u0a40\u0a26\u0a3e \u0a39\u0a48| \u0a1c\u0a3f\u0a35\u0a47\u0a02 \u0a15\u0a3f \u0a07\u0a71\u0a15 \u0a28\u0a3e\u0a35\u0a32 \u0a28\u0a42\u0a70 \u0a07\u0a71\u0a15 \u0a15\u0a3f\u0a24\u0a3e\u0a2c \u0a35\u0a3f\u0a71\u0a1a \u0a38\u0a3e\u0a15\u0a3e\u0a30 \u0a15\u0a40\u0a24\u0a3e \u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a02\u0a26\u0a3e \u0a39\u0a48\u0964 \u0a07\u0a39 \u0a32\u0a4b\u0a5c \u0a39\u0a30 \u0a15\u0a3f\u0a38\u0a2e \u0a26\u0a47 \u0a15\u0a70\u0a2e '\u0a24\u0a47 \u0a32\u0a3e\u0a17\u0a42 \u0a28\u0a39\u0a40\u0a02 \u0a39\u0a41\u0a70\u0a26\u0a40\u0964\u0a38\u0a70\u0a17\u0a40\u0a24\u0a15 \u0a30\u0a1a\u0a28\u0a3e\u0a35\u0a3e\u0a02 \u0a28\u0a42\u0a70 \u0a2c\u0a3f\u0a28\u0a3e\u0a02 \u0a2a\u0a26\u0a3e\u0a30\u0a25\u0a40\u0a15\u0a30\u0a28 \u0a24\u0a4b\u0a02 \u0a35\u0a40\u0964 \u0a15\u0a3e\u0a2a\u0a40\u0a30\u0a3e\u0a08\u0a1f \u0a38\u0a41\u0a30\u0a71\u0a16\u0a3f\u0a06 \u0a26\u0a3f\u0a71\u0a24\u0a40 \u0a1c\u0a3e \u0a38\u0a15\u0a26\u0a40 \u0a39\u0a48\u0964", + "A57/PA": "\u0a07\u0a71\u0a15 \u0a2a\u0a47\u0a1f\u0a48\u0a02\u0a1f \u0a05\u0a30\u0a1c\u0a3c\u0a40 \u0a35\u0a3f\u0a71\u0a1a \u0a26\u0a47\u0a30\u0a40 \u0a28\u0a39\u0a40\u0a02 \u0a39\u0a4b\u0a23\u0a40 \u0a1a\u0a3e\u0a39\u0a40\u0a26\u0a40 \u0a05\u0a24\u0a47 \u0a05\u0a30\u0a1c\u0a3c\u0a40 \u0a1c\u0a32\u0a26\u0a40 \u0a24\u0a4b\u0a02 \u0a1c\u0a32\u0a26\u0a40 \u0a38\u0a70\u0a2d\u0a35 \u0a2e\u0a3f\u0a24\u0a40 '\u0a24\u0a47 \u0a26\u0a3e\u0a07\u0a30 \u0a15\u0a40\u0a24\u0a40 \u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a23\u0a40 \u0a1a\u0a3e\u0a39\u0a40\u0a26\u0a40 \u0a39\u0a48\u0964 \u0a15\u0a3e\u0a22 \u0a26\u0a40 \u0a2a\u0a4d\u0a30\u0a15\u0a3f\u0a30\u0a24\u0a40 \u0a26\u0a3e \u0a16\u0a41\u0a32\u0a3e\u0a38\u0a3e \u0a15\u0a30\u0a26\u0a47 \u0a39\u0a4b\u0a0f \u0a07\u0a71\u0a15 \u0a2a\u0a4d\u0a30\u0a4b\u0a35\u0a40\u0a38\u0a3c\u0a28\u0a3e\u0a32 \u0a05\u0a71\u0a2a\u0a32\u0a40\u0a15\u0a48\u0a38\u0a3c\u0a28 (provisional application)\u0a26\u0a3e\u0a07\u0a30 \u0a15\u0a30 \u0a38\u0a15\u0a26\u0a47 \u0a39\u0a3e\u0a02\u0964 \u0a07\u0a39 \u0a15\u0a3e\u0a22 \u0a26\u0a40 \u0a05\u0a38\u0a32 \u0a30\u0a1c\u0a3f\u0a38\u0a1f\u0a4d\u0a30\u0a47\u0a38\u0a3c\u0a28 \u0a28\u0a42\u0a70 \u0a24\u0a30\u0a1c\u0a40\u0a39 (priority) \u0a26\u0a47\u0a23 \u0a35\u0a3f\u0a71\u0a1a \u0a2e\u0a26\u0a26 \u0a15\u0a30\u0a47\u0a17\u0a3e \u0964 \u0a05\u0a30\u0a1c\u0a3c\u0a40 \u0a2b\u0a3e\u0a30\u0a2e \u0a2d\u0a30\u0a28 \u0a35\u0a3f\u0a71\u0a1a \u0a26\u0a47\u0a30\u0a40 \u0a15\u0a30\u0a28 \u0a26\u0a40 \u0a38\u0a32\u0a3e\u0a39 \u0a28\u0a39\u0a40\u0a02 \u0a26\u0a3f\u0a71\u0a24\u0a40 \u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a02\u0a26\u0a40 \u0a15\u0a3f\u0a09\u0a02\u0a15\u0a3f \u0a07\u0a38 \u0a35\u0a3f\u0a71\u0a1a \u0a1c\u0a4b\u0a16\u0a2e \u0a38\u0a3c\u0a3e\u0a2e\u0a32 \u0a39\u0a41\u0a70\u0a26\u0a47 \u0a39\u0a28| \u0a1c\u0a3f\u0a35\u0a47\u0a02 - (i) \u0a15\u0a3f\u0a38\u0a47 \u0a39\u0a4b\u0a30 \u0a16\u0a4b\u0a1c\u0a15\u0a30\u0a24\u0a3e \u0a26\u0a41\u0a06\u0a30\u0a3e \u0a24\u0a41\u0a39\u0a3e\u0a21\u0a40 \u0a15\u0a3e\u0a22 \u0a32\u0a08 \u0a05\u0a30\u0a1c\u0a3c\u0a40 \u0a26\u0a3e\u0a07\u0a30 \u0a15\u0a30\u0a28\u0a3e, \u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a02 (ii) \u0a16\u0a4b\u0a1c\u0a15\u0a30\u0a24\u0a3e \u0a26\u0a41\u0a06\u0a30\u0a3e \u0a17\u0a32\u0a24\u0a40 \u0a28\u0a3e\u0a32 \u0a06\u0a2a\u0a23\u0a40 \u0a15\u0a3e\u0a22 \u0a28\u0a3e\u0a32 \u0a38\u0a2c\u0a70\u0a27\u0a24 \u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a23\u0a15\u0a3e\u0a30\u0a40 \u0a1c\u0a28\u0a24\u0a15 \u0a15\u0a30 \u0a26\u0a3f\u0a71\u0a24\u0a3e \u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a23\u0a3e\u0964", + "A32/PA": "\u0a2c\u0a4d\u0a30\u0a4c\u0a21\u0a15\u0a3e\u0a38\u0a1f\u0a30\u0a3e\u0a02 \u0a15\u0a4b\u0a32 \u0a09\u0a39\u0a28\u0a3e\u0a02 \u0a26\u0a47 \u0a2a\u0a4d\u0a30\u0a38\u0a3e\u0a30\u0a23 '\u0a24\u0a47 \u0a35\u0a3f\u0a38\u0a3c\u0a47\u0a38\u0a3c \u0a05\u0a27\u0a3f\u0a15\u0a3e\u0a30 \u0a39\u0a28 \u0a1c\u0a3f\u0a28\u0a4d\u0a39\u0a3e\u0a02 \u0a28\u0a42\u0a70 \"\u0a2c\u0a4d\u0a30\u0a4c\u0a21\u0a15\u0a3e\u0a38\u0a1f \u0a30\u0a40\u0a2a\u0a4d\u0a30\u0a4b\u0a21\u0a15\u0a38\u0a3c\u0a28 \u0a30\u0a3e\u0a08\u0a1f\u0a38\" \u0a15\u0a3f\u0a39\u0a3e \u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a02\u0a26\u0a3e \u0a39\u0a48\u0964 \u0a07\u0a38 \u0a05\u0a27\u0a3f\u0a15\u0a3e\u0a30 \u0a26\u0a47 \u0a24\u0a39\u0a3f\u0a24, \u0a15\u0a4b\u0a08 \u0a35\u0a40 \u0a2a\u0a4d\u0a30\u0a38\u0a3e\u0a30\u0a15 \u0a26\u0a40 \u0a07\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a1c\u0a3c\u0a24 \u0a24\u0a4b\u0a02 \u0a2c\u0a3f\u0a28\u0a3e\u0a02 \u0a39\u0a47\u0a20 \u0a32\u0a3f\u0a16\u0a3f\u0a06\u0a02 \u0a28\u0a39\u0a40\u0a02 \u0a15\u0a30 \u0a38\u0a15\u0a26\u0a3e \u0a39\u0a48: \u0a2a\u0a4d\u0a30\u0a38\u0a3e\u0a30\u0a23 \u0a28\u0a42\u0a70 \u0a2e\u0a41\u0a5c-\u0a2a\u0a4d\u0a30\u0a38\u0a3e\u0a30\u0a3f\u0a24 \u0a15\u0a30\u0a28\u0a3e \u0a2a\u0a48\u0a38\u0a47 \u0a32\u0a08 \u0a2a\u0a4d\u0a30\u0a38\u0a3e\u0a30\u0a23 \u0a1c\u0a28\u0a24\u0a15 \u0a2c\u0a23\u0a3e\u0a09\u0a23\u0a3e\u0964 \u0a2a\u0a4d\u0a30\u0a38\u0a3e\u0a30\u0a23 \u0a26\u0a40 \u0a06\u0a21\u0a40\u0a13 \u0a35\u0a3f\u0a1c\u0a3c\u0a42\u0a05\u0a32 \u0a30\u0a3f\u0a15\u0a3e\u0a30\u0a21\u0a3f\u0a70\u0a17 \u0a2c\u0a23\u0a3e\u0a09\u0a23\u0a3e\u0964 \u0a05\u0a1c\u0a3f\u0a39\u0a40\u0a06\u0a02 \u0a30\u0a3f\u0a15\u0a3e\u0a30\u0a21\u0a3f\u0a70\u0a17\u0a3e\u0a02 \u0a28\u0a42\u0a70 \u0a15\u0a3f\u0a30\u0a3e\u0a0f '\u0a24\u0a47 \u0a26\u0a47\u0a23\u0a3e \u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a02 \u0a35\u0a47\u0a1a\u0a23\u0a3e\u0964 \u0a2a\u0a4d\u0a30\u0a38\u0a3e\u0a30\u0a15 \u0a26\u0a3e \u0a07\u0a39 \u0a05\u0a27\u0a3f\u0a15\u0a3e\u0a30 25 \u0a38\u0a3e\u0a32\u0a3e\u0a02 \u0a32\u0a08 \u0a35\u0a48\u0a27 \u0a39\u0a48\u0964 (\u0a15\u0a3e\u0a2a\u0a40\u0a30\u0a3e\u0a08\u0a1f \u0a10\u0a15\u0a1f, 1957 \u0a26\u0a40 \u0a27\u0a3e\u0a30\u0a3e 37 \u0a26\u0a47\u0a16\u0a4b)", + "A45/TA": "\u0bb5\u0b9f\u0bbf\u0bb5\u0bae\u0bc8\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bc8\u0baa\u0bcd \u0baa\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0bb5\u0bc1\u0b9a\u0bc6\u0baf\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bbe\u0bb2\u0bcd, \u0b89\u0bb0\u0bbf\u0bae\u0bc8\u0baf\u0bbe\u0bb3\u0bb0\u0bc1\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bc1 10 \u0bb5\u0bb0\u0bc1\u0b9f \u0b95\u0bbe\u0bb2\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0bb1\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bc1 \u0baa\u0bca\u0bb0\u0bc1\u0bb3\u0bbf\u0ba9\u0bcd \u0bae\u0bc0\u0ba4\u0bc1 \u0baa\u0bbf\u0bb0\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0baf\u0bc7\u0b95 \u0b89\u0bb0\u0bbf\u0bae\u0bc8\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bcd \u0b89\u0bb3\u0bcd\u0bb3\u0ba9. 10 \u0b86\u0ba3\u0bcd\u0b9f\u0bc1\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bcd \u0bae\u0bc1\u0b9f\u0bbf\u0bb5\u0b9f\u0bc8\u0ba8\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bbe\u0bb2\u0bcd, \u0bae\u0bc7\u0bb2\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd 5 \u0b86\u0ba3\u0bcd\u0b9f\u0bc1\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bc1\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bc1 \u0baa\u0bc1\u0ba4\u0bc1\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bbf\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bb2\u0bcd \u0b95\u0b9f\u0bcd\u0b9f\u0ba3\u0bae\u0bcd \u0b9a\u0bc6\u0bb2\u0bc1\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bbf \u0ba8\u0bc0\u0b9f\u0bcd\u0b9f\u0bbf\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0b9f\u0bb2\u0bbe\u0bae\u0bcd. (\u0bb5\u0b9f\u0bbf\u0bb5\u0bae\u0bc8\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bc1\u0b9a\u0bcd \u0b9a\u0b9f\u0bcd\u0b9f\u0bae\u0bcd, 2000 \u0b87\u0ba9\u0bcd \u0baa\u0bbf\u0bb0\u0bbf\u0bb5\u0bc1 11\u0b90\u0baa\u0bcd \u0baa\u0bbe\u0bb0\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb5\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd)", + "A32/TA": "\u0b92\u0bb2\u0bbf\u0baa\u0bb0\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bbe\u0bb3\u0bb0\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bc1\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bc1 \u0b85\u0bb5\u0bb0\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bbf\u0ba9\u0bcd \u0b92\u0bb2\u0bbf\u0baa\u0bb0\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bc8\u0baa\u0bcd \u0baa\u0bca\u0bb1\u0bc1\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bae\u0b9f\u0bcd\u0b9f\u0bbf\u0bb2\u0bcd, \"\u0b92\u0bb2\u0bbf\u0baa\u0bb0\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bc1 \u0bae\u0bb1\u0bc1 \u0b89\u0bb0\u0bc1\u0bb5\u0bbe\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bae\u0bcd \u0b89\u0bb0\u0bbf\u0bae\u0bc8\" \u0b8e\u0ba9\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0b9f\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd \u0b89\u0bb0\u0bbf\u0bae\u0bc8 \u0b89\u0bb3\u0bcd\u0bb3\u0ba4\u0bc1. \u0b87\u0ba8\u0bcd\u0ba4 \u0b89\u0bb0\u0bbf\u0bae\u0bc8\u0baf\u0bbf\u0ba9\u0bcd \u0b95\u0bc0\u0bb4\u0bcd, \u0b92\u0bb3\u0bbf\u0baa\u0bb0\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bbe\u0bb3\u0bb0\u0bbf\u0ba9\u0bcd \u0b85\u0ba9\u0bc1\u0bae\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0baf\u0bbf\u0ba9\u0bcd\u0bb1\u0bbf \u0baf\u0bbe\u0bb0\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd \u0baa\u0bbf\u0ba9\u0bcd\u0bb5\u0bb0\u0bc1\u0bb5\u0ba9\u0bb5\u0bb1\u0bcd\u0bb1\u0bc8\u0b9a\u0bcd \u0b9a\u0bc6\u0baf\u0bcd\u0baf \u0bae\u0bc1\u0b9f\u0bbf\u0baf\u0bbe\u0ba4\u0bc1: \u0b92\u0bb2\u0bbf\u0baa\u0bb0\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bc8 \u0bae\u0bc0\u0ba3\u0bcd\u0b9f\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd \u0b92\u0bb3\u0bbf\u0baa\u0bb0\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bc1\u0bb5\u0ba4\u0bc1. \u0b8f\u0ba4\u0bbe\u0bb5\u0ba4\u0bca\u0bb0\u0bc1 \u0b95\u0b9f\u0bcd\u0b9f\u0ba3\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bc8\u0baf\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd \u0baa\u0bc6\u0bb1\u0bcd\u0bb1\u0bc1\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bca\u0ba3\u0bcd\u0b9f\u0bc1 \u0baa\u0bca\u0ba4\u0bc1\u0bae\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bc1\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bc1\u0ba4\u0bcd \u0bb5\u0bb4\u0b99\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bc1\u0bb5\u0ba4\u0bc1. \u0b92\u0bb2\u0bbf\u0baa\u0bb0\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bbf\u0ba9\u0bcd \u0b92\u0bb2\u0bbf \u0bae\u0bb1\u0bcd\u0bb1\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd \u0b95\u0bbe\u0b9f\u0bcd\u0b9a\u0bbf\u0baa\u0bcd \u0baa\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0bb5\u0bc8 \u0b89\u0bb0\u0bc1\u0bb5\u0bbe\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bc1\u0bb5\u0ba4\u0bc1. \u0b85\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0b95\u0bc8\u0baf \u0b92\u0bb2\u0bbf \u0b85\u0bb2\u0bcd\u0bb2\u0ba4\u0bc1 \u0b95\u0bbe\u0b9f\u0bcd\u0b9a\u0bbf\u0baa\u0bcd \u0baa\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0bb5\u0bc1\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bc8 \u0bb5\u0bbf\u0bb1\u0bcd\u0baa\u0ba4\u0bc1 \u0b85\u0bb2\u0bcd\u0bb2\u0ba4\u0bc1 \u0bb5\u0bbe\u0b9f\u0b95\u0bc8\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bc1\u0b95\u0bcd \u0b95\u0bca\u0b9f\u0bc1\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0ba4\u0bc1. \u0b92\u0bb2\u0bbf\u0baa\u0bb0\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bbe\u0bb3\u0bb0\u0bbf\u0ba9\u0bcd \u0b89\u0bb0\u0bbf\u0bae\u0bc8 25 \u0b86\u0ba3\u0bcd\u0b9f\u0bc1\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bc1\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bc1\u0b9a\u0bcd \u0b9a\u0bc6\u0bb2\u0bcd\u0bb2\u0bc1\u0baa\u0b9f\u0bbf\u0baf\u0bbe\u0b95\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd. (\u0baa\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bc1\u0bb0\u0bbf\u0bae\u0bc8\u0b9a\u0bcd \u0b9a\u0b9f\u0bcd\u0b9f\u0bae\u0bcd, 1957 \u0baa\u0bbf\u0bb0\u0bbf\u0bb5\u0bc1 37\u0b90\u0baa\u0bcd \u0baa\u0bbe\u0bb0\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb5\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd)", + "A8/TA": "\u0b87\u0bb2\u0bcd\u0bb2\u0bc8. \u0b89\u0b99\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bcd \u0bb5\u0bb0\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0b95 \u0bae\u0bc1\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0bb0\u0bc8\u0baf\u0bc8 \u0ba8\u0bc0\u0b99\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bcd \u0baa\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0bb5\u0bc1 \u0b9a\u0bc6\u0baf\u0bcd\u0baf \u0bb5\u0bc7\u0ba3\u0bcd\u0b9f\u0bbf\u0baf \u0b85\u0bb5\u0b9a\u0bbf\u0baf\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb2\u0bcd\u0bb2\u0bc8. \u0b87\u0bb0\u0bc1\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bbf\u0ba9\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd, \u0b87\u0ba4\u0bc1 \u0b89\u0b99\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bcd \u0b95\u0bc1\u0bb1\u0bbf\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bc1 \u0bae\u0bc7\u0bb2\u0bcd \u0b89\u0b99\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bc1\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bc1 \u0b89\u0bb0\u0bbf\u0bae\u0bc8 \u0bae\u0bb1\u0bcd\u0bb1\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd \u0b9a\u0b9f\u0bcd\u0b9f\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bc2\u0bb0\u0bcd\u0bb5\u0bae\u0bbe\u0ba9 \u0baa\u0bb2\u0ba9\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bc8 \u0bb5\u0bb4\u0b99\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd \u0b8e\u0ba9\u0bcd\u0baa\u0ba4\u0bbe\u0bb2\u0bcd \u0baa\u0bb0\u0bbf\u0ba8\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bc1\u0bb0\u0bc8\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0b9f\u0bc1\u0b95\u0bbf\u0bb1\u0ba4\u0bc1. \u0baa\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0bb5\u0bc1\u0b9a\u0bc6\u0baf\u0bcd\u0baf\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0b9f\u0bcd\u0b9f \u0bb5\u0bb0\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0b95 \u0bae\u0bc1\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0bb0\u0bc8\u0baf\u0bc8 \u0bae\u0bc0\u0bb1\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd \u0baa\u0b9f\u0bcd\u0b9a\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0bb2\u0bcd \u0bb5\u0bb0\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0b95 \u0bae\u0bc1\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0bb0\u0bc8 \u0bae\u0bc0\u0bb1\u0bb2\u0bcd \u0bb5\u0bb4\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bc1 \u0ba4\u0bbe\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb2\u0bcd \u0b9a\u0bc6\u0baf\u0bcd\u0baf\u0bb2\u0bbe\u0bae\u0bcd.", + "A19/TA": "\u0bb5\u0bb0\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0b95 \u0bae\u0bc1\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0bb0\u0bc8 \u0bb5\u0b95\u0bc8\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bcd \u0b8e\u0ba9\u0bcd\u0baa\u0ba4\u0bc1 \u0bb5\u0ba3\u0bbf\u0b95\u0b99\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bcd/ \u0b9a\u0bc7\u0bb5\u0bc8\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bcd/\u0baa\u0bca\u0bb0\u0bc1\u0b9f\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bcd \u0baa\u0bcb\u0ba9\u0bcd\u0bb1 \u0baa\u0bb2\u0bcd\u0bb5\u0bc7\u0bb1\u0bc1 \u0bb5\u0b95\u0bc8\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bbe\u0b95\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd. \u0b87\u0ba8\u0bcd\u0ba4 \u0bb5\u0b95\u0bc8\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bbf\u0ba9\u0bcd \u0b85\u0b9f\u0bbf\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0b9f\u0bc8\u0baf\u0bbf\u0bb2\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bbe\u0ba9\u0bcd \u0bb5\u0bb0\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0b95\u0bae\u0bc1\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0bb0\u0bc8 \u0bb5\u0bbf\u0ba3\u0bcd\u0ba3\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bae\u0bcd \u0b85\u0bae\u0bc8\u0baf\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd. \u0b89\u0b99\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bcd \u0bb5\u0ba3\u0bbf\u0b95\u0bae\u0bcd/ \u0ba4\u0baf\u0bbe\u0bb0\u0bbf\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bc1/\u0b9a\u0bc7\u0bb5\u0bc8\u0baf\u0bbf\u0ba9\u0bcd \u0bb5\u0b95\u0bc8\u0baf\u0bc8\u0baa\u0bcd \u0baa\u0bca\u0bb1\u0bc1\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bc1, \u0b89\u0b99\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bcd \u0bb5\u0bb0\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0b95 \u0bae\u0bc1\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0bb0\u0bc8\u0baf\u0bc8\u0baa\u0bcd \u0baa\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0bb5\u0bc1\u0b9a\u0bc6\u0baf\u0bcd\u0baf \u0bb5\u0bbf\u0bb0\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd \u0bb5\u0b95\u0bc8\u0baf\u0bc8 \u0ba8\u0bc0\u0b99\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bcd \u0ba4\u0bc7\u0bb0\u0bcd\u0bb5\u0bc1 \u0b9a\u0bc6\u0baf\u0bcd\u0baf\u0bb2\u0bbe\u0bae\u0bcd. \u0b8e.\u0b95\u0bbe. \u0ba4\u0bbe\u0ba9\u0bbf\u0baf\u0b99\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bbf \u0bae\u0bcb\u0b9f\u0bcd\u0b9f\u0bbe\u0bb0\u0bcd \u0bb5\u0bbe\u0b95\u0ba9\u0bae\u0bcd \u0b89\u0bb1\u0bcd\u0baa\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bbf \u0ba4\u0bca\u0b9f\u0bb0\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bbe\u0ba9 \u0bb5\u0ba3\u0bbf\u0b95\u0bae\u0bcd, '\u0bb5\u0bbe\u0b95\u0ba9\u0b99\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bcd' \u0b8e\u0ba9\u0bcd\u0bb1 \u0bb5\u0bb0\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0b95 \u0bae\u0bc1\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0bb0\u0bc8 \u0bb5\u0b95\u0bc8 12\u0ba9\u0bcd \u0b95\u0bc0\u0bb4\u0bcd \u0b85\u0b9f\u0bc8\u0baf\u0bbe\u0bb3\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bc8\u0baa\u0bcd \u0baa\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0bb5\u0bc1 \u0b9a\u0bc6\u0baf\u0bcd\u0baf\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd. \u0bb5\u0bb0\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0b95 \u0bae\u0bc1\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0bb0\u0bc8\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bcd \u0b9a\u0b9f\u0bcd\u0b9f\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0ba9\u0bcd \u0ba8\u0bbe\u0ba9\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bbe\u0bb5\u0ba4\u0bc1 \u0b85\u0b9f\u0bcd\u0b9f\u0bb5\u0ba3\u0bc8\u0baf\u0bbf\u0bb2\u0bcd \u0baa\u0bb2\u0bcd\u0bb5\u0bc7\u0bb1\u0bc1 \u0bb5\u0b95\u0bc8\u0baf\u0bbe\u0ba9 \u0baa\u0bca\u0bb0\u0bc1\u0b9f\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bcd \u0bae\u0bb1\u0bcd\u0bb1\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd \u0b9a\u0bc7\u0bb5\u0bc8\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bbf\u0ba9\u0bcd \u0baa\u0bc6\u0baf\u0bb0\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bcd \u0bb5\u0bb4\u0b99\u0bcd\u0b95\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0b9f\u0bcd\u0b9f\u0bc1\u0bb3\u0bcd\u0bb3\u0ba9. \u0b85\u0ba4\u0bc8\u0baf\u0bc7 \u0b87\u0b99\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd \u0b95\u0bbe\u0ba3\u0bb2\u0bbe\u0bae\u0bcd. .", + "A22/TA": "\u0baa\u0bc6\u0baf\u0bb0\u0bcd \u0b95\u0bc1\u0bb1\u0bbf\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bbf\u0b9f\u0bc1\u0bb5\u0ba4\u0bc1 \u0baa\u0bcb\u0bb2\u0bcd \u0baa\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bc1\u0bb0\u0bbf\u0bae\u0bc8 \u0b89\u0b99\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bcd \u0b89\u0bb0\u0bbf\u0bae\u0bc8\u0baf\u0bbe\u0b95\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd, \u0b87\u0ba4\u0bc1 \u0b89\u0b99\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bcd \u0b9a\u0bc1\u0baf\u0bae\u0bbe\u0ba9 \u0baa\u0b9f\u0bc8\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bc8 \u0bae\u0bb1\u0bcd\u0bb1\u0bb5\u0bb0\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bcd '\u0ba8\u0b95\u0bb2\u0bc6\u0b9f\u0bc1' \u0b9a\u0bc6\u0baf\u0bcd\u0bb5\u0ba4\u0bc8\u0ba4\u0bcd \u0ba4\u0b9f\u0bc1\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95 \u0b89\u0b99\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bc8 \u0b85\u0ba9\u0bc1\u0bae\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bbf\u0bb1\u0ba4\u0bc1. \u0baa\u0bca\u0ba4\u0bc1\u0bb5\u0bbe\u0b95, \u0baa\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bc1\u0bb0\u0bbf\u0bae\u0bc8\u0baa\u0bcd \u0baa\u0bc6\u0bb1\u0bcd\u0bb1\u0bb5\u0bb0\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bcd \u0ba4\u0b99\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bcd \u0b85\u0ba9\u0bc1\u0bae\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0baf\u0bbf\u0ba9\u0bcd\u0bb1\u0bbf \u0bae\u0bb1\u0bc1 \u0b89\u0bb0\u0bc1\u0bb5\u0bbe\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bae\u0bcd, \u0b92\u0bb2\u0bbf\u0baa\u0bb0\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bc1, \u0bae\u0bca\u0bb4\u0bbf\u0bae\u0bbe\u0bb1\u0bcd\u0bb1\u0bae\u0bcd, \u0bb5\u0bbf\u0bb1\u0bcd\u0baa\u0ba9\u0bc8 \u0b85\u0bb2\u0bcd\u0bb2\u0ba4\u0bc1 \u0baa\u0bca\u0ba4\u0bc1 \u0ba8\u0bbf\u0b95\u0bb4\u0bcd\u0b9a\u0bcd\u0b9a\u0bbf\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bc1\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bc1\u0baa\u0bcd \u0baa\u0baf\u0ba9\u0bcd\u0baa\u0b9f\u0bc1\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bc1\u0bb5\u0ba4\u0bc1 \u0baa\u0bcb\u0ba9\u0bcd\u0bb1\u0bb5\u0bb1\u0bcd\u0bb1\u0bbf\u0bb2\u0bbf\u0bb0\u0bc1\u0ba8\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bc1 \u0ba4\u0b99\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bcd \u0bb5\u0bc6\u0bb3\u0bbf\u0baf\u0bc0\u0b9f\u0bc1\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bc8\u0baa\u0bcd \u0baa\u0bbe\u0ba4\u0bc1\u0b95\u0bbe\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95 \u0bae\u0bc1\u0b9f\u0bbf\u0baf\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd (\u0baa\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bc1\u0bb0\u0bbf\u0bae\u0bc8\u0b9a\u0bcd \u0b9a\u0b9f\u0bcd\u0b9f\u0bae\u0bcd, 1957 \u0b87\u0ba9\u0bcd \u0baa\u0bbf\u0bb0\u0bbf\u0bb5\u0bc1 14\u0b90\u0baa\u0bcd \u0baa\u0bbe\u0bb0\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb5\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd).", + "A25/TE": "\u0c2e\u0c40 \u0c38\u0c43\u0c37\u0c4d\u0c1f\u0c3f\u0c15\u0c3f \u0c15\u0c3e\u0c2a\u0c40\u0c30\u0c48\u0c1f\u0c4d \u0c30\u0c15\u0c4d\u0c37\u0c23 \u0c2a\u0c4a\u0c02\u0c26\u0c1f\u0c3e\u0c28\u0c3f\u0c15\u0c3f \u0c30\u0c1a\u0c28 (Work) - \u0c38\u0c3e\u0c39\u0c3f\u0c24\u0c4d\u0c2f, \u0c28\u0c3e\u0c1f\u0c15,\u0c38\u0c02\u0c17\u0c40\u0c24, \u0c15\u0c33\u0c3e\u0c24\u0c4d\u0c2e\u0c15 \u0c30\u0c1a\u0c28\u0c32\u0c41 , \u0c38\u0c3f\u0c28\u0c3f\u0c2e\u0c3e\u0c1f\u0c4b\u0c17\u0c4d\u0c30\u0c3e \u0c2b\u0c3f\u0c15\u0c4d \u0c38\u0c3f\u0c28\u0c3f\u0c2e\u0c3e\u0c32\u0c41 \u0c2e\u0c30\u0c3f\u0c2f\u0c41 \u0c38\u0c4c\u0c02\u0c21\u0c4d \u0c30\u0c3f\u0c15\u0c3e\u0c30\u0c4d\u0c21\u0c3f\u0c02\u0c17\u0c4d. \u0c35\u0c3e\u0c38\u0c4d\u0c24\u0c35\u0c3f\u0c15\u0c24 (Original) - \u0c2a\u0c28\u0c3f \u0c1a\u0c47\u0c38\u0c47\u0c1f\u0c2a\u0c4d\u0c2a\u0c41\u0c21\u0c41 \u0c15\u0c28\u0c40\u0c38\u0c02 \u0c28\u0c48\u0c2a\u0c41\u0c23\u0c4d\u0c2f\u0c02, \u0c36\u0c4d\u0c30\u0c2e \u0c2e\u0c30\u0c3f\u0c2f\u0c41 \u0c24\u0c40\u0c30\u0c4d\u0c2a\u0c41\u0c28\u0c41 \u0c09\u0c2a\u0c2f\u0c4b\u0c17\u0c3f\u0c02\u0c1a\u0c3e\u0c32\u0c3f. \u0c07\u0c26\u0c3f \u0c15\u0c33\u0c3e\u0c24\u0c4d\u0c2e\u0c15 \u0c2f\u0c4b\u0c17\u0c4d\u0c2f\u0c24\u0c28\u0c41 \u0c15\u0c32\u0c3f\u0c17\u0c3f \u0c09\u0c02\u0c21\u0c35\u0c1a\u0c4d\u0c1a\u0c41 \u0c32\u0c47\u0c26\u0c3e \u0c09\u0c02\u0c21\u0c15\u0c2a\u0c4b\u0c35\u0c1a\u0c4d\u0c1a\u0c41. \u0c15\u0c3e\u0c28\u0c40 \u0c07\u0c26\u0c3f \u0c30\u0c1a\u0c2f\u0c3f\u0c24 \u0c2f\u0c4a\u0c15\u0c4d\u0c15 \u0c05\u0c38\u0c32\u0c41 \u0c30\u0c1a\u0c28 \u0c05\u0c2f\u0c3f \u0c09\u0c02\u0c21\u0c3e\u0c32\u0c3f. \u0c2b\u0c3f\u0c15\u0c4d\u0c38\u0c47\u0c37\u0c28\u0c4d (Fixed) - \u0c2a\u0c28\u0c3f \u0c2d\u0c4c\u0c24\u0c3f\u0c15 \u0c30\u0c42\u0c2a\u0c02\u0c32\u0c4b \u0c38\u0c4d\u0c25\u0c3f\u0c30\u0c02\u0c17\u0c3e \u0c09\u0c02\u0c21\u0c3e\u0c32\u0c3f. \u0c09\u0c26\u0c3e\u0c39\u0c30\u0c23\u0c15\u0c41 \u0c12\u0c15 \u0c28\u0c35\u0c32 \u0c2a\u0c41\u0c38\u0c4d\u0c24\u0c15\u0c02 \u0c30\u0c42\u0c2a\u0c02 \u0c26\u0c3e\u0c32\u0c4d\u0c1a\u0c21\u0c02. \u0c08 \u0c05\u0c35\u0c38\u0c30\u0c02 \u0c05\u0c28\u0c4d\u0c28\u0c3f \u0c30\u0c15\u0c3e\u0c32 \u0c2a\u0c28\u0c41\u0c32\u0c15\u0c41 \u0c35\u0c30\u0c4d\u0c24\u0c3f\u0c02\u0c1a\u0c26\u0c41. \u0c09\u0c26\u0c3e\u0c39\u0c30\u0c23\u0c15\u0c41, \u0c38\u0c02\u0c17\u0c40\u0c24 \u0c15\u0c02\u0c2a\u0c4b\u0c1c\u0c3f\u0c37\u0c28\u0c4d\u0c32\u0c15\u0c41 \u0c2e\u0c46\u0c1f\u0c40\u0c30\u0c3f\u0c2f\u0c32\u0c48\u0c1c\u0c47\u0c37\u0c28\u0c4d \u0c32\u0c47\u0c15\u0c41\u0c02\u0c21\u0c3e . \u0c15\u0c42\u0c21\u0c3e \u0c15\u0c3e\u0c2a\u0c40\u0c30\u0c48\u0c1f\u0c4d \u0c30\u0c15\u0c4d\u0c37\u0c23 \u0c07\u0c35\u0c4d\u0c35\u0c2c\u0c21\u0c41\u0c24\u0c41\u0c02\u0c26\u0c3f.", + "A42/TE": "\u0c32\u0c47\u0c26\u0c41. \u0c2a\u0c48\u0c28 \u0c35\u0c3f\u0c35\u0c30\u0c3f\u0c02\u0c1a\u0c3f\u0c28 \u0c2a\u0c4d\u0c30\u0c15\u0c3e\u0c30\u0c02, \u0c35\u0c3e\u0c30\u0c41 \u0c2a\u0c28\u0c3f, \u0c15\u0c3e\u0c2a\u0c40\u0c30\u0c48\u0c1f\u0c4d \u0c1a\u0c1f\u0c4d\u0c1f\u0c02 \u0c15\u0c3f\u0c02\u0c26 '\u0c15\u0c33\u0c3e\u0c24\u0c4d\u0c2e\u0c15 \u0c2a\u0c28\u0c3f' (Artistic \u0c35\u0c30\u0c4d\u0c15\u0c4d) \u0c2e\u0c27\u0c4d\u0c2f \u0c35\u0c3e\u0c30\u0c41 \u0c21\u0c3f\u0c1c\u0c48\u0c28\u0c4d \u0c28\u0c3f\u0c30\u0c4d\u0c35\u0c1a\u0c28\u0c02 \u0c28\u0c41\u0c02\u0c21\u0c3f \u0c2e\u0c3f\u0c28\u0c39\u0c3e\u0c2f\u0c3f\u0c02\u0c2a\u0c41. \u0c2e\u0c40\u0c30\u0c41 \u0c2e\u0c40 \u0c15\u0c33\u0c3e\u0c24\u0c4d\u0c2e\u0c15 \u0c2a\u0c28\u0c3f\u0c28\u0c3f \u0c2a\u0c3e\u0c30\u0c3f\u0c36\u0c4d\u0c30\u0c3e \u0c2e\u0c3f\u0c15 \u0c24\u0c2f\u0c3e\u0c30\u0c40 \u0c35\u0c38\u0c4d\u0c24\u0c41 \u0c35\u0c41\u0c32\u0c2a\u0c48 \u0c2a\u0c46\u0c1f\u0c4d\u0c1f\u0c21\u0c02 \u0c2a\u0c4d\u0c30\u0c3e\u0c30\u0c02\u0c2d\u0c3f\u0c38\u0c4d\u0c24\u0c47, 50 \u0c15\u0c02\u0c1f\u0c47 \u0c0e\u0c15\u0c4d\u0c15\u0c41\u0c35 \u0c38\u0c3e\u0c30\u0c4d\u0c32\u0c41 \u0c2a\u0c41\u0c28\u0c30\u0c41\u0c24\u0c4d\u0c2a\u0c24\u0c4d\u0c24\u0c3f \u0c1a\u0c47\u0c38\u0c3f\u0c28\u0c1f\u0c4d\u0c32\u0c2f\u0c3f\u0c24\u0c47 \u0c2e\u0c40\u0c30\u0c41 \u0c26\u0c3e\u0c28\u0c3f\u0c2a\u0c48 \u0c2e\u0c40 \u0c15\u0c3e\u0c2a\u0c40\u0c30\u0c48\u0c1f\u0c4d\u200c \u0c30\u0c15\u0c4d\u0c37\u0c23\u0c28\u0c41 \u0c15\u0c4b\u0c32\u0c4d\u0c2a\u0c4b\u0c24\u0c3e\u0c30\u0c41. \u0c08 \u0c38\u0c02\u0c26\u0c30\u0c4d\u0c2d\u0c02\u0c32\u0c4b \u0c2e\u0c40 \u0c2a\u0c28\u0c3f\u0c15\u0c3f \u0c21\u0c3f\u0c1c\u0c48\u0c28\u0c4d \u0c30\u0c15\u0c4d\u0c37\u0c23 \u0c32\u0c47\u0c26\u0c3e \u0c15\u0c3e\u0c2a\u0c40\u0c30\u0c48\u0c1f\u0c4d \u0c30\u0c15\u0c4d\u0c37\u0c23 \u0c1a\u0c1f\u0c4d\u0c1f \u0c2a\u0c4d\u0c30\u0c15\u0c3e\u0c30\u0c02 \u0c32\u0c2d\u0c3f\u0c02\u0c1a\u0c26\u0c41. ( \u0c15\u0c3e\u0c2a\u0c40\u0c30\u0c48\u0c1f\u0c4d \u0c1a\u0c1f\u0c4d\u0c1f\u0c02\u0c32\u0c4b\u0c28\u0c3f \u0c38\u0c46\u0c15\u0c4d\u0c37\u0c28\u0c4d 15 \u0c15\u0c4d\u0c30\u0c3f\u0c02\u0c26 )", + "A39/TE": "\u0c21\u0c3f\u0c1c\u0c48\u0c28\u0c4d \u0c05\u0c02\u0c1f\u0c47 \u0c0f\u0c26\u0c48\u0c28\u0c3e \u0c06\u0c15\u0c3e\u0c30\u0c02, \u0c0e\u0c02\u0c2a\u0c3f\u0c15, \u0c28\u0c2e\u0c42\u0c28\u0c3e, \u0c06\u0c2d\u0c30\u0c23\u0c02, \u0c2a\u0c02\u0c15\u0c4d\u0c24\u0c41\u0c32\u0c41 \u0c32\u0c47\u0c26\u0c3e \u0c30\u0c02\u0c17\u0c41\u0c32 \u0c15\u0c42\u0c30\u0c4d\u0c2a\u0c41 \u0c32\u0c47\u0c26\u0c3e \u0c15\u0c32\u0c2f\u0c3f\u0c15. \u0c07\u0c26\u0c3f \u0c2a\u0c3e\u0c30\u0c3f\u0c36\u0c4d\u0c30\u0c3e\u0c2e\u0c3f\u0c15 \u0c2a\u0c4d\u0c30\u0c15\u0c4d\u0c30\u0c3f\u0c2f \u0c26\u0c4d\u0c35\u0c3e\u0c30\u0c3e \u0c0f\u0c26\u0c48\u0c28\u0c3e \u0c35\u0c38\u0c4d\u0c24\u0c41\u0c35\u0c41\u0c15\u0c41 (2 \u0c21\u0c3f \u0c32\u0c47\u0c26\u0c3e 3 \u0c21\u0c3f) \u0c35\u0c30\u0c4d\u0c24\u0c3f\u0c02\u0c1a\u0c2c\u0c21\u0c41\u0c24\u0c41\u0c02\u0c26\u0c3f. \u0c21\u0c3f\u0c1c\u0c48\u0c28\u0c4d \u0c2a\u0c28\u0c3f\u0c15\u0c3f \u0c24\u0c17\u0c3f\u0c28\u0c1f\u0c4d\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c3e \u0c2e\u0c3e\u0c24\u0c4d\u0c30\u0c2e\u0c47 \u0c06\u0c2c\u0c4d\u0c1c\u0c46\u0c15\u0c4d\u0c1f\u0c4d \u0c15\u0c02\u0c1f\u0c3f\u0c15\u0c3f \u0c35\u0c3f\u0c02\u0c26\u0c41 \u0c1a\u0c47\u0c2f\u0c21\u0c3e\u0c28\u0c3f\u0c15\u0c3f \u0c15\u0c3e\u0c28\u0c3f, \u0c05\u0c26\u0c3f \u0c35\u0c38\u0c4d\u0c24\u0c41\u0c35\u0c41 \u0c2f\u0c4a\u0c15\u0c4d\u0c15 \u0c15\u0c3e\u0c30\u0c4d\u0c2f\u0c3e\u0c1a\u0c30\u0c23\u0c28\u0c41 \u0c2a\u0c46\u0c02\u0c1a\u0c21\u0c3e\u0c28\u0c3f\u0c15\u0c3f \u0c15\u0c3e\u0c26\u0c41. \u0c09\u0c26\u0c3e\u0c39\u0c30\u0c23\u0c15\u0c41: \u0c12\u0c15 \u0c1a\u0c4a\u0c15\u0c4d\u0c15\u0c3e \u0c24\u0c2f\u0c3e\u0c30\u0c40\u0c26\u0c3e\u0c30\u0c41 \u0c35\u0c3e\u0c30\u0c3f \u0c05\u0c28\u0c4d\u0c28\u0c3f \u0c1a\u0c4a\u0c15\u0c4d\u0c15\u0c3e\u0c32\u0c41 \u0c1a\u0c46\u0c15\u0c4d \u0c21\u0c3f\u0c1c\u0c48\u0c28\u0c4d '\u0c15\u0c3f \u0c12\u0c15 \u0c2a\u0c4d\u0c30\u0c24\u0c4d\u0c2f\u0c47\u0c15 \u0c30\u0c15\u0c02 \u0c35\u0c30\u0c4d\u0c24\u0c3f\u0c38\u0c4d\u0c24\u0c41\u0c02\u0c26\u0c3f. \u0c08 \u0c21\u0c3f\u0c1c\u0c48\u0c28\u0c4d \u0c2e\u0c3e\u0c24\u0c4d\u0c30\u0c2e\u0c47 \u0c05\u0c38\u0c32\u0c48\u0c28 \u0c09\u0c24\u0c4d\u0c2a\u0c24\u0c4d\u0c24\u0c3f \u0c05\u0c02\u0c1f\u0c47. \u0c1a\u0c4a\u0c15\u0c4d\u0c15\u0c3e \u0c05\u0c02\u0c26\u0c02\u0c17\u0c3e \u0c1a\u0c47\u0c38\u0c4d\u0c24\u0c41\u0c02\u0c26\u0c3f. \u0c24\u0c2f\u0c3e\u0c30\u0c40\u0c26\u0c3e\u0c30\u0c41 \u0c21\u0c3f\u0c1c\u0c48\u0c28\u0c4d \u0c15\u0c3f\u0c02\u0c26 \u0c38\u0c02\u0c30\u0c15\u0c4d\u0c37\u0c3f\u0c02\u0c1a\u0c35\u0c1a\u0c4d\u0c1a\u0c41 (\u0c38\u0c46\u0c15\u0c4d\u0c37\u0c28\u0c4d 2 (\u0c21\u0c3f\u0c1c\u0c48\u0c28\u0c4d \u0c1a\u0c1f\u0c4d\u0c1f\u0c02 \u0c21\u0c3f), 2000)", + "A22/TE": "\u0c15\u0c3e\u0c2a\u0c40\u0c30\u0c48\u0c1f\u0c4d \u0c2a\u0c47\u0c30\u0c41 \u0c38\u0c42\u0c1a\u0c3f\u0c02\u0c1a\u0c3f\u0c28\u0c1f\u0c4d\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c3e, \u0c2e\u0c40 \u0c2a\u0c28\u0c3f\u0c28\u0c3f \u0c07\u0c24\u0c30\u0c41\u0c32\u0c41 '\u0c15\u0c3e\u0c2a\u0c40 \u0c1a\u0c47\u0c2f\u0c15\u0c41\u0c02\u0c21\u0c3e' \u0c28\u0c3f\u0c30\u0c4b\u0c27\u0c3f\u0c02\u0c1a\u0c21\u0c3e\u0c28\u0c3f\u0c15\u0c3f \u0c2e\u0c3f\u0c2e\u0c4d\u0c2e\u0c32\u0c4d\u0c28\u0c3f \u0c05\u0c28\u0c41\u0c2e\u0c24\u0c3f\u0c38\u0c4d\u0c24\u0c41\u0c02\u0c26\u0c3f. \u0c15\u0c3e\u0c2a\u0c40\u0c30\u0c48\u0c1f\u0c4d, \u0c38\u0c3e\u0c27\u0c3e\u0c30\u0c23\u0c02\u0c17\u0c3e, \u0c39\u0c4b\u0c32\u0c4d\u0c21\u0c30\u0c4d\u200c\u0c32\u0c15\u0c41 \u0c35\u0c3e\u0c30\u0c3f \u0c2a\u0c28\u0c3f\u0c28\u0c3f \u0c2a\u0c4d\u0c30\u0c1a\u0c41\u0c30\u0c3f\u0c02\u0c1a\u0c15\u0c41\u0c02\u0c21\u0c3e, \u0c05\u0c28\u0c41\u0c35\u0c26\u0c3f\u0c02\u0c1a\u0c21\u0c3e\u0c28\u0c3f\u0c15\u0c3f, \u0c05\u0c28\u0c41\u0c2e\u0c24\u0c3f \u0c32\u0c47\u0c15\u0c41\u0c02\u0c21\u0c3e \u0c07\u0c24\u0c30\u0c41\u0c32\u0c41 \u0c35\u0c3f\u0c15\u0c4d\u0c30\u0c2f\u0c3f\u0c02\u0c1a\u0c21\u0c3e\u0c28\u0c3f\u0c15\u0c3f \u0c32\u0c47\u0c26\u0c3e \u0c35\u0c3e\u0c30\u0c3f \u0c05\u0c28\u0c41\u0c2e\u0c24\u0c3f \u0c32\u0c47\u0c15\u0c41\u0c02\u0c21\u0c3e \u0c2c\u0c39\u0c3f\u0c30\u0c02\u0c17 \u0c2a\u0c4d\u0c30\u0c26\u0c30\u0c4d\u0c36\u0c28\u0c15\u0c41 \u0c09\u0c2a\u0c2f\u0c4b\u0c17\u0c3f\u0c02\u0c1a\u0c15\u0c41\u0c02\u0c21\u0c3e \u0c28\u0c3f\u0c30\u0c4b\u0c27\u0c3f\u0c02\u0c1a\u0c47 \u0c39\u0c15\u0c4d\u0c15\u0c41\u0c28\u0c41 \u0c07\u0c38\u0c4d\u0c24\u0c41\u0c02\u0c26\u0c3f. (\u0c15\u0c3e\u0c2a\u0c40\u0c30\u0c48\u0c1f\u0c4d \u0c1a\u0c1f\u0c4d\u0c1f\u0c02, 1957 \u0c32\u0c4b\u0c28\u0c3f \u0c38\u0c46\u0c15\u0c4d\u0c37\u0c28\u0c4d 14 \u0c1a\u0c42\u0c21\u0c02\u0c21\u0c3f)", + "A2/TE": "\u0c2e\u0c47\u0c27\u0c4b \u0c38\u0c02\u0c2a\u0c24\u0c4d\u0c24\u0c3f \u0c39\u0c15\u0c4d\u0c15\u0c41\u0c32\u0c41 \u0c2e\u0c40 \u0c1c\u0c40\u0c35\u0c3f\u0c24\u0c02\u0c32\u0c4b\u0c28\u0c3f \u0c05\u0c28\u0c4d\u0c28\u0c3f \u0c30\u0c02\u0c17\u0c3e\u0c32\u0c32\u0c4b \u0c09\u0c02\u0c1f\u0c3e\u0c2f\u0c3f.. \u0c2e\u0c40\u0c30\u0c41 \u0c35\u0c4d\u0c2f\u0c3e\u0c2a\u0c3e\u0c30\u0c3e\u0c28\u0c4d\u0c28\u0c3f \u0c2a\u0c4d\u0c30\u0c3e \u0c30\u0c02\u0c2d\u0c3f\u0c02\u0c1a\u0c3f\u0c28\u0c3e,\u0c1a\u0c47\u0c38\u0c3f\u0c28\u0c3e \u0c2a\u0c41\u0c38\u0c4d\u0c24\u0c15\u0c02 \u0c30\u0c3e\u0c38\u0c3f\u0c28\u0c3e , \u0c1f\u0c40-\u0c37\u0c30\u0c4d\u0c1f\u0c41 \u0c30\u0c42\u0c2a\u0c15\u0c32\u0c4d\u0c2a\u0c28 \u0c32\u0c47\u0c26\u0c3e \u0c0f\u0c26\u0c48\u0c28\u0c3e \u0c15\u0c28\u0c3f\u0c2a\u0c46\u0c1f\u0c4d\u0c1f\u0c3f\u0c28\u0c3e. \u0c2e\u0c40 \u0c2f\u0c3e\u0c1c\u0c2e\u0c3e\u0c28\u0c4d\u0c2f\u0c3e\u0c28\u0c4d\u0c28\u0c3f \u0c15\u0c3e\u0c2a\u0c3e\u0c21\u0c1f\u0c3e\u0c28\u0c3f\u0c15\u0c3f \u0c07\u0c35\u0c28\u0c4d\u0c28\u0c40 \u0c2e\u0c30\u0c3f\u0c2f\u0c41 \u0c07\u0c32\u0c3e\u0c02\u0c1f\u0c3f \u0c05\u0c28\u0c47\u0c15 \u0c38\u0c43\u0c37\u0c4d\u0c1f\u0c3f\u0c32\u0c15\u0c41 \u0c08 \u0c05\u0c28\u0c41\u0c2c\u0c02\u0c27 \u0c39\u0c15\u0c4d\u0c15\u0c41\u0c32\u0c41 \u0c09\u0c02\u0c21\u0c3e\u0c32\u0c3f." + }, + "acts": { + "2007_56_32_6/HI": "(\u0918) \u0927\u093e\u0930\u093e 9 \u0915\u0940 \u0909\u092a\u0927\u093e\u0930\u093e (2) \u0915\u0947 \u0905\u0927\u0940\u0928 \u0935\u0943\u0926\u094d\u0927\u093e\u0936\u094d\u0930\u092e \u0915\u0947 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u092c\u0902\u0927 \u0915\u0947 \u0932\u093f\u090f \u0938\u094d\u0915\u0940\u092e, \u091c\u093f\u0938\u0915\u0947 \u0905\u0902\u0924\u0930\u094d\u0917\u0924 \u0909\u0928\u0915\u0947 \u0926\u094d\u0935\u093e\u0930\u093e \u0909\u092a\u0932\u092c\u094d\u0927 \u0915\u0930\u093e\u0908 \u091c\u093e\u0928\u0947 \u0935\u093e\u0932\u0940 \u0938\u0947\u0935\u093e\u0913\u0902 \u0915\u0947 \u092e\u093e\u0928\u0915 \u0914\u0930 \u0935\u093f\u092d\u093f\u0928\u094d\u200d\u0928 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0915\u093e\u0930 \u0915\u0940 \u0938\u0947\u0935\u093e\u090f\u0902 \u092d\u0940 \u0939\u0948\u0902, \u091c\u094b \u0910\u0938\u0947 \u0906\u0936\u094d\u0930\u092e\u094b\u0902 \u0915\u0947 \u0928\u093f\u0935\u093e\u0938\u093f\u092f\u094b\u0902 \u0915\u0940 \u091a\u093f\u0915\u093f\u0924\u094d\u0938\u0940\u092f \u0926\u0947\u0916\u0930\u0947\u0916 \u0914\u0930 \u092e\u0928\u094b\u0930\u0902\u091c\u0928 \u0915\u0947 \u0938\u093e\u0927\u0928\u094b\u0902 \u0915\u0947 \u0932\u093f\u090f \u0906\u0935\u0936\u094d\u092f\u0915 \u0939\u094b\u0902 ;", + "1976_19_6_3/HI": "(3) \u092c\u0928\u094d\u0927\u093f\u0924 \u090b\u0923 \u0915\u0940 \u0935\u0938\u0942\u0932\u0940 \u0915\u0947 \u0932\u093f\u090f \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0924\u094d\u092f\u0947\u0915 \u0921\u093f\u0915\u094d\u0930\u0940 \u092f\u093e \u0906\u0926\u0947\u0936, \u091c\u094b \u0907\u0938 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0928\u093f\u092f\u092e \u0915\u0947 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u093e\u0930\u092e\u094d\u092d \u0915\u0947 \u092a\u0942\u0930\u094d\u0935 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u093f\u0924 \u0915\u093f\u092f\u093e \u0917\u092f\u093e \u0939\u094b \u0914\u0930 \u0910\u0938\u0947 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u093e\u0930\u092e\u094d\u092d \u0915\u0947 \u092a\u0942\u0930\u094d\u0935 \u092a\u0942\u0930\u094d\u0923\u0924\u092f\u093e \u091a\u0941\u0915\u0924\u093e \u0928 \u0915\u093f\u092f\u093e \u0917\u092f\u093e \u0939\u094b, \u0910\u0938\u0947 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u093e\u0930\u092e\u094d\u092d \u092a\u0930 \u092a\u0942\u0930\u094d\u0923\u0924\u092f\u093e \u091a\u0941\u0915\u0924\u093e \u0915\u093f\u092f\u093e \u0917\u092f\u093e \u0938\u092e\u091d\u093e \u091c\u093e\u090f\u0917\u093e \u0964", + "1969_18_4_3/HI": "(3) \u0930\u093e\u091c\u094d\u092f \u0938\u0930\u0915\u093e\u0930 \u0926\u094d\u0935\u093e\u0930\u093e \u0926\u093f\u090f \u0917\u090f \u0928\u093f\u0926\u0947\u0936\u094b\u0902 \u0915\u0947, \u092f\u0926\u093f \u0915\u094b\u0908 \u0939\u094b\u0902, \u0905\u0927\u094d\u092f\u0927\u0940\u0928 \u0930\u0939\u0924\u0947 \u0939\u0941\u090f \u092e\u0941\u0916\u094d\u092f \u0930\u091c\u093f\u0938\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930\u093e\u0930 \u0915\u093f\u0938\u0940 \u0930\u093e\u091c\u094d\u092f \u092e\u0947\u0902 \u0907\u0938 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0928\u093f\u092f\u092e \u0915\u0947 \u0909\u092a\u092c\u0928\u094d\u0927\u094b\u0902 \u0914\u0930 \u0924\u0926\u094d\u0927\u0940\u0928 \u092c\u0928\u093e\u090f \u0917\u090f \u0928\u093f\u092f\u092e\u094b\u0902 \u0914\u0930 \u0915\u093f\u090f \u0917\u090f \u0906\u0926\u0947\u0936\u094b\u0902 \u0915\u0947 \u0928\u093f\u0937\u094d\u092a\u093e\u0926\u0928 \u0915\u0947 \u0932\u093f\u090f \u092e\u0941\u0916\u094d\u092f \u0915\u093e\u0930\u094d\u092f\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0915 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u093e\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0939\u094b\u0917\u093e\u0964", + "2008_34_22_6/HI": "(3) \u0915\u093f\u0938\u0940 \u0935\u093f\u0936\u0947\u0937 \u0928\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092f\u093e\u0932\u092f \u0915\u094b \u0907\u0938 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0928\u093f\u092f\u092e \u0926\u094d\u0935\u093e\u0930\u093e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0926\u0924\u094d\u0924 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u093f\u0924\u093e \u0915\u093e, \u0907\u0938 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0928\u093f\u092f\u092e \u0915\u0947 \u0905\u0927\u0940\u0928 \u0926\u0902\u0921\u0928\u0940\u092f \u0915\u093f\u0938\u0940 \u0905\u092a\u0930\u093e\u0927 \u0915\u0947 \u092e\u093e\u092e\u0932\u0947 \u092e\u0947\u0902 \u0909\u092a\u0927\u093e\u0930\u093e (1) \u0915\u0947 \u0905\u0927\u0940\u0928 \u0930\u093e\u091c\u094d\u092f \u0938\u0930\u0915\u093e\u0930 \u0926\u094d\u0935\u093e\u0930\u093e \u0915\u094b\u0908 \u0935\u093f\u0936\u0947\u0937 \u0928\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092f\u093e\u0932\u092f \u0917\u0920\u093f\u0924 \u0915\u093f\u090f \u091c\u093e\u0928\u0947 \u0924\u0915 \u0938\u0902\u0939\u093f\u0924\u093e \u092e\u0947\u0902 \u0915\u093f\u0938\u0940 \u092c\u093e\u0924 \u0915\u0947 \u0939\u094b\u0924\u0947 \u0939\u0941\u090f \u092d\u0940, \u0909\u0938 \u0916\u0902\u0921 \u0915\u0947 \u0938\u0947\u0936\u0928 \u0928\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092f\u093e\u0932\u092f \u0926\u094d\u0935\u093e\u0930\u093e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u092f\u094b\u0917 \u0915\u093f\u092f\u093e \u091c\u093e\u090f\u0917\u093e \u091c\u093f\u0938\u092e\u0947\u0902 \u0910\u0938\u093e \u0905\u092a\u0930\u093e\u0927 \u0915\u093f\u092f\u093e \u0917\u092f\u093e \u0939\u0948 \u0914\u0930 \u0909\u0938\u0915\u094b \u0938\u092d\u0940 \u0936\u0915\u094d\u0924\u093f\u092f\u093e\u0902 \u0939\u094b\u0902\u0917\u0940 \u0924\u0925\u093e \u0935\u0939 \u0907\u0938 \u0905\u0927\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092f \u0915\u0947 \u0905\u0927\u0940\u0928 \u0909\u092a\u092c\u0902\u0927\u093f\u0924 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0915\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f\u093e \u0915\u093e \u092a\u093e\u0932\u0928 \u0915\u0930\u0947\u0917\u093e \u0964", + "1976_19_7_2/HI": "(2) \u092f\u0926\u093f \u0909\u092a\u0927\u093e\u0930\u093e (1) \u092e\u0947\u0902 \u0928\u093f\u0930\u094d\u0926\u093f\u0937\u094d\u091f \u0915\u093f\u0938\u0940 \u0938\u092e\u094d\u092a\u0924\u094d\u0924\u093f \u0915\u093e \u0915\u092c\u094d\u091c\u093e \u092c\u0928\u094d\u0927\u093f\u0924 \u0936\u094d\u0930\u092e\u093f\u0915 \u0915\u094b \u0935\u093e\u092a\u0938 \u0915\u0930\u0928\u0947 \u092e\u0947\u0902 \u0915\u094b\u0908 \u0935\u093f\u0932\u092e\u094d\u092c \u0915\u093f\u092f\u093e \u091c\u093e\u0924\u093e \u0939\u0948 \u0924\u094b \u0910\u0938\u093e \u0936\u094d\u0930\u092e\u093f\u0915 \u0910\u0938\u0947 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u093e\u0930\u092e\u094d\u092d \u0915\u0940 \u0924\u093e\u0930\u0940\u0916 \u0938\u0947 \u0939\u0940 \u092c\u0928\u094d\u0927\u0915\u0926\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u0947 \u092f\u093e \u092d\u093e\u0930, \u0927\u093e\u0930\u0923\u093e\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e \u0935\u093f\u0932\u094d\u0932\u0902\u0917\u092e \u0915\u0947 \u0927\u093e\u0930\u0915 \u0938\u0947 \u0910\u0938\u0947 \u0905\u0928\u094d\u0924:\u0915\u093e\u0932\u0940\u0928 \u0932\u093e\u092d \u0935\u0938\u0942\u0932 \u0915\u0930\u0928\u0947 \u0915\u093e \u0939\u0915\u0926\u093e\u0930 \u0939\u094b\u0917\u093e \u091c\u094b \u0927\u0928-\u0938\u092e\u094d\u092c\u0928\u094d\u0927\u0940 \u0928\u093f\u092e\u094d\u0928\u0924\u092e \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u093f\u0924\u093e \u0935\u093e\u0932\u0947 \u0910\u0938\u0947 \u0938\u093f\u0935\u093f\u0932 \u0928\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092f\u093e\u0932\u092f \u0926\u094d\u0935\u093e\u0930\u093e \u0905\u0935\u0927\u093e\u0930\u093f\u0924 \u0915\u093f\u090f \u091c\u093e\u090f\u0902 \u091c\u093f\u0938\u0915\u0940 \u0938\u094d\u0925\u093e\u0928\u0940\u092f \u0938\u0940\u092e\u093e\u0913\u0902 \u0915\u0940 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u093f\u0924\u093e \u0915\u0947 \u092d\u0940\u0924\u0930 \u0910\u0938\u0940 \u0938\u092e\u094d\u092a\u0924\u094d\u0924\u093f \u0938\u094d\u0925\u093f\u0924 \u0939\u0948 \u0964", + "2007_2_10_3/BN": "(\u09e9) \u098f\u0987 \u0986\u0987\u09a8 \u0985\u09a8\u09c1\u09af\u09be\u09af\u09bc\u09c0 \u09b8\u0995\u09b2 \u09ac\u09bf\u09b6\u09cd\u09ac\u09be\u09b8\u09c7 \u0995\u09c3\u09a4 \u09ac\u09be \u0995\u09c3\u09a4 \u09b9\u0987\u09ac\u09be\u09b0 \u099c\u09a8\u09cd\u09af \u0985\u09ad\u09bf\u09aa\u09cd\u09b0\u09c7\u09a4 \u0995\u09cb\u09a8 \u0995\u09be\u09b0\u09cd\u09af\u09c7\u09b0 \u099c\u09a8\u09cd\u09af \u0985\u09a7\u09cd\u09af\u09be\u09af\u09bc \u09ea-\u098f \u09af\u09a5\u09be \u0989\u09b2\u09cd\u09b2\u09bf\u0996\u09bf\u09a4 \u0995\u09cb\u09a8 \u09aa\u09cd\u09b0\u09be\u09a7\u09bf\u0995\u09be\u09b0 \u0993 \u09a4\u09ce\u09b8\u09b9 \u0989\u09b9\u09be\u09b0 \u099a\u09c7\u09af\u09bc\u09be\u09b0\u09aa\u09be\u09b0\u09cd\u09b8\u09a8, \u09b8\u09a6\u09b8\u09cd\u09af\u0997\u09a3, \u09b8\u09a6\u09b8\u09cd\u09af-\u09b8\u099a\u09bf\u09ac, \u0986\u09a7\u09bf\u0995\u09be\u09b0\u09bf\u0995\u09ac\u09c3\u09a8\u09cd\u09a6 \u09ac\u09be \u0985\u09a8\u09cd\u09af \u0995\u09cb\u09a8 \u0995\u09b0\u09cd\u09ae\u099a\u09be\u09b0\u09c0\u09b0 \u09ac\u09bf\u09b0\u09c1\u09a6\u09cd\u09a7\u09c7 \u0995\u09cb\u09a8 \u09ae\u09cb\u0995\u09a6\u09cd\u09a6\u09ae\u09be \u09ac\u09be \u0985\u09a8\u09cd\u09af \u0995\u09cb\u09a8 \u09ac\u09c8\u09a7\u09bf\u0995 \u0995\u09be\u09b0\u09cd\u09af\u09ac\u09be\u09b9 \u099a\u09b2\u09bf\u09ac\u09c7 \u09a8\u09be\u0964", + "2006_4_28_1/BN": "\u09e8\u09ee\u0964 (\u09e7) \u09b0\u09be\u099c\u09cd\u09af \u09b8\u09b0\u0995\u09be\u09b0, \u098f\u09a4\u09ce\u09aa\u0995\u09cd\u09b7\u09c7 \u09ac\u09bf\u09a7\u09bf\u09a6\u09cd\u09ac\u09be\u09b0\u09be \u09ac\u09bf\u09a7\u09be\u09a8\u09ae\u09a3\u09cd\u09a1\u09b2 \u0995\u09b0\u09cd\u09a4\u09c3\u0995 \u09af\u09a5\u09cb\u099a\u09bf\u09a4 \u0989\u09aa\u09af\u09cb\u099c\u09a8-\u098f\u09b0 \u09aa\u09b0, \u09b0\u09be\u099c\u09cd\u09af \u09b8\u09b0\u0995\u09be\u09b0 \u098f\u0987 \u0986\u0987\u09a8\u09c7\u09b0 \u09aa\u09cd\u09b0\u09af\u09bc\u09cb\u099c\u09a8\u09be\u09b0\u09cd\u09a5\u09c7 \u09b8\u09a6\u09cd\u09ac\u09cd\u09af\u09ac\u09b9\u09be\u09b0 \u09b9\u0987\u09ac\u09be\u09b0 \u099c\u09a8\u09cd\u09af \u09af\u09c7\u09b0\u09c2\u09aa \u0989\u09aa\u09af\u09c1\u0995\u09cd\u09a4 \u09ae\u09a8\u09c7 \u0995\u09b0\u09bf\u09ac\u09c7\u09a8 \u09b8\u09c7\u09b0\u09c2\u09aa \u0985\u09b0\u09cd\u09a5\u09be\u0999\u09cd\u0995 \u0985\u09a8\u09c1\u09a6\u09be\u09a8\u09b0\u09c2\u09aa\u09c7 \u09b0\u09be\u099c\u09cd\u09af \u0995\u09ae\u09bf\u09b6\u09a8\u0995\u09c7 \u09aa\u09cd\u09b0\u09a6\u09be\u09a8 \u0995\u09b0\u09bf\u09ac\u09c7\u09a8\u0964", + "2006_4_4_2/BN": "\u09a4\u09ac\u09c7, \u099a\u09c7\u09af\u09bc\u09be\u09b0\u09aa\u09be\u09b0\u09cd\u09b8\u09a8, \u09ae\u09b9\u09bf\u09b2\u09be \u0993 \u09b6\u09bf\u09b6\u09c1 \u0989\u09a8\u09cd\u09a8\u09af\u09bc\u09a8 \u09ae\u09a8\u09cd\u09a4\u09cd\u09b0\u0995 \u09ac\u09be \u09ac\u09bf\u09ad\u09be\u0997\u09c7\u09b0 \u09ad\u09be\u09b0\u09aa\u09cd\u09b0\u09be\u09aa\u09cd\u09a4 \u09ae\u09a8\u09cd\u09a4\u09cd\u09b0\u09c0 \u09ae\u09b9\u09cb\u09a6\u09af\u09bc\u09c7\u09b0 \u09b8\u09ad\u09be\u09aa\u09a4\u09bf\u09a4\u09cd\u09ac\u09c7 \u0995\u09c7\u09a8\u09cd\u09a6\u09cd\u09b0\u09c0\u09af\u09bc \u09b8\u09b0\u0995\u09be\u09b0 \u0995\u09b0\u09cd\u09a4\u09c3\u0995 \u0997\u09a0\u09bf\u09a4 \u09a4\u09bf\u09a8 \u09b8\u09a6\u09b8\u09cd\u09af\u09c7\u09b0 \u09a8\u09bf\u09b0\u09cd\u09ac\u09be\u099a\u09a8 \u0995\u09ae\u09bf\u099f\u09bf\u09b0 \u09b8\u09c1\u09aa\u09be\u09b0\u09bf\u09b6\u09c7\u09b0 \u09ad\u09bf\u09a4\u09cd\u09a4\u09bf\u09a4\u09c7 \u09a8\u09bf\u09af\u09c1\u0995\u09cd\u09a4 \u09b9\u0987\u09ac\u09c7\u09a8\u0964", + "2008_34_11_9/BN": "(\u09ef) \u09af\u0996\u09a8 \u0995\u09cb\u09a8 \u0985\u099e\u09cd\u099a\u09b2 \u09ac\u09be \u0985\u099e\u09cd\u099a\u09b2\u09b8\u09ae\u09c2\u09b9\u09c7\u09b0 \u099c\u09a8\u09cd\u09af \u098f\u0995\u09be\u09a7\u09bf\u0995 \u09ac\u09bf\u09b6\u09c7\u09b7 \u0986\u09a6\u09be\u09b2\u09a4\u0995\u09c7 \u09a8\u09be\u09ae\u09cb\u09a6\u09bf\u09b8\u09cd\u099f \u0995\u09b0\u09be \u09b9\u09af\u09bc \u09a4\u0996\u09a8 \u099c\u09cd\u09af\u09c7\u09b7\u09cd\u09a0\u09a4\u09ae \u099c\u099c \u09a4\u09c0\u09b9\u09be\u09a6\u09c7\u09b0 \u09ae\u09a7\u09cd\u09af\u09c7 \u0995\u09be\u09b0\u09cd\u09af \u09ac\u09bf\u09a4\u09b0\u09a3 \u0995\u09b0\u09bf\u09ac\u09c7\u09a8\u0964", + "2006_4_11_1/BN": "\u09e7\u09e7\u0964 (\u09e7) \u0995\u09c7\u09a8\u09cd\u09a6\u09cd\u09b0\u09c0\u09af\u09bc \u09b8\u09b0\u0995\u09be\u09b0, \u09aa\u09cd\u09b0\u099c\u09cd\u099e\u09be\u09aa\u09a8 \u09a6\u09cd\u09ac\u09be\u09b0\u09be, \u0995\u09ae\u09bf\u09b6\u09a8\u09c7\u09b0 \u098f\u0995\u099c\u09a8 \u09b8\u09a6\u09b8\u09cd\u09af-\u09b8\u099a\u09bf\u09ac\u09b0\u09c2\u09aa\u09c7 \u09ad\u09be\u09b0\u09a4 \u09b8\u09b0\u0995\u09be\u09b0\u09c7\u09b0 \u09af\u09c1\u0997\u09cd\u09ae-\u09b8\u099a\u09bf\u09ac \u09ac\u09be \u0985\u09a4\u09bf\u09b0\u09bf\u0995\u09cd\u09a4 \u09b8\u099a\u09bf\u09ac \u09aa\u09a6\u09ae\u09b0\u09cd\u09af\u09be\u09a6\u09be\u09b0 \u09a8\u09bf\u09ae\u09cd\u09a8\u09aa\u09a6\u09b8\u09cd\u09a5 \u09a8\u09b9\u09c7\u09a8 \u098f\u09b0\u09c2\u09aa \u098f\u0995\u099c\u09a8 \u0986\u09a7\u09bf\u0995\u09be\u09b0\u09bf\u0995 \u09a8\u09bf\u09af\u09c1\u0995\u09cd\u09a4 \u0995\u09b0\u09bf\u09ac\u09c7\u09a8 \u098f\u09ac\u0982 \u0995\u09ae\u09bf\u09b6\u09a8\u09c7\u09b0 \u0995\u09c3\u09a4\u09cd\u09af\u09b8\u09ae\u09c2\u09b9\u09c7\u09b0 \u09a6\u0995\u09cd\u09b7 \u09b8\u09ae\u09cd\u09aa\u09be\u09a6\u09a8\u09c7\u09b0 \u099c\u09a8\u09cd\u09af \u09af\u09c7\u09b0\u09c2\u09aa \u0986\u09ac\u09b6\u09cd\u09af\u0995 \u09b9\u0987\u09ac\u09c7 \u09b8\u09c7\u09b0\u09c2\u09aa \u0985\u09a8\u09cd\u09af\u09be\u09a8\u09cd\u09af \u0986\u09a7\u09bf\u0995\u09be\u09b0\u09bf\u0995 \u0993 \u0995\u09b0\u09cd\u09ae\u099a\u09be\u09b0\u09c0 \u0995\u09ae\u09bf\u09b6\u09a8\u09c7\u09b0 \u09a8\u09bf\u0995\u099f \u09aa\u09cd\u09b0\u09be\u09aa\u09cd\u09a4\u09bf\u09b8\u09be\u09a7\u09cd\u09af \u0995\u09b0\u09bf\u09ac\u09c7\u09a8\u0964", + "2006_4_29_1/ML": "(1) \u0d15\u0d2e\u0d4d\u0d2e\u0d40\u0d37\u0d7b \u0d36\u0d30\u0d3f\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d2f \u0d05\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d57\u0d23\u0d4d\u0d1f\u0d41\u0d15\u0d33\u0d41\u0d02 \u0d2a\u0d4d\u0d30\u0d38\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d24\u0d2e\u0d3e\u0d2f \u0d2e\u0d31\u0d4d\u0d31\u0d41 \u0d31\u0d3f\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d3e\u0d7c\u0d21\u0d41\u0d15\u0d33\u0d41\u0d02 \u0d35\u0d1a\u0d4d\u0d1a\u0d41 \u0d2a\u0d4b\u0d30\u0d47\u0d23\u0d4d\u0d1f\u0d24\u0d41\u0d02 \u0d2d\u0d3e\u0d30\u0d24\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d24\u0d3f\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d31\u0d46 \u0d15\u0d30\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d7c \u0d06\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d31\u0d4d \u0d06\u0d21\u0d3f\u0d31\u0d4d\u0d31\u0d7c \u0d1c\u0d28\u0d31\u0d32\u0d41\u0d2e\u0d3e\u0d2f\u0d3f \u0d15\u0d42\u0d1f\u0d3f\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d32\u0d4b\u0d1a\u0d3f\u0d1a\u0d4d\u0d1a\u0d4d \u0d15\u0d47\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d26\u0d4d\u0d30 \u0d38\u0d7c\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d3e\u0d7c \u0d28\u0d3f\u0d7c\u0d23\u0d4d\u0d23\u0d2f\u0d3f\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d2a\u0d4d\u0d2a\u0d46\u0d1f\u0d3e\u0d35\u0d41\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28 \u0d05\u0d19\u0d4d\u0d19\u0d28\u0d46\u0d2f\u0d41\u0d33\u0d4d\u0d33 \u0d2b\u0d3e\u0d31\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d24\u0d3f\u0d7d \u0d05\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d57\u0d23\u0d4d\u0d1f\u0d41\u0d15\u0d33\u0d41\u0d1f\u0d46 \u0d12\u0d30\u0d41 \u0d35\u0d3e\u0d7c\u0d37\u0d3f\u0d15 \u0d38\u0d4d\u0d31\u0d4d\u0d31\u0d47\u0d31\u0d4d\u0d31\u0d41\u0d2e\u0d46\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d31\u0d4d \u0d24\u0d2f\u0d4d\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d31\u0d3e\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d41\u0d15\u0d2f\u0d41\u0d02 \u0d1a\u0d46\u0d2f\u0d4d\u0d2f\u0d47\u0d23\u0d4d\u0d1f\u0d24\u0d3e\u0d23\u0d4d.", + "2007_56_19_2/ML": "(2) \u0d38\u0d02\u0d38\u0d4d\u0d25\u0d3e\u0d28\u0d38\u0d30\u0d4d\u200d\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d3e\u0d30\u0d3f\u0d28\u0d4d\u200c \u0d05\u0d19\u0d4d\u0d19\u0d28\u0d46\u0d2f\u0d41\u0d33\u0d4d\u0d33 \u0d17\u0d43\u0d39\u0d19\u0d4d\u0d19\u0d33\u0d3f\u0d32\u0d46 \u0d05\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d24\u0d47\u0d35\u0d3e\u0d38\u0d3f\u0d15\u0d33\u0d41\u0d1f\u0d46 \u0d35\u0d48\u0d26\u0d4d\u0d2f\u0d2a\u0d30\u0d3f\u0d30\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d37\u0d2f\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d41\u0d02 \u0d35\u0d3f\u0d28\u0d4b\u0d26\u0d4b\u0d2a\u0d3e\u0d27\u0d3f\u0d15\u0d33\u0d4d\u200d\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d41\u0d02 \u0d06\u0d35\u0d36\u0d4d\u0d2f\u0d2e\u0d3e\u0d2f \u0d28\u0d3f\u0d32\u0d35\u0d3e\u0d30\u0d19\u0d4d\u0d19\u0d33\u0d41\u0d02 \u0d05\u0d35 \u0d28\u0d32\u0d4d\u200d\u0d15\u0d47\u0d23\u0d4d\u0d1f \u0d35\u0d3f\u0d35\u0d3f\u0d27 \u0d24\u0d30\u0d19\u0d4d\u0d19\u0d33\u0d3f\u0d32\u0d41\u0d33\u0d4d\u0d33 \u0d38\u0d47\u0d35\u0d28\u0d19\u0d4d\u0d19\u0d33\u0d41\u0d02 \u0d09\u0d33\u0d4d\u200d\u0d2a\u0d4d\u0d2a\u0d46\u0d1f\u0d46, \u0d35\u0d3e\u0d7c\u0d26\u0d4d\u0d27\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d2f\u0d15\u0d3e \u0d32 \u0d17\u0d43\u0d39\u0d19\u0d4d\u0d19\u0d33\u0d41\u0d1f\u0d46 \u0d28\u0d1f\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d24\u0d3f\u0d2a\u0d4d\u0d2a\u0d3f\u0d28\u0d41 \u0d35\u0d47\u0d23\u0d4d\u0d1f\u0d3f\u0d2f\u0d41\u0d33\u0d4d\u0d33 \u0d12\u0d30\u0d41 \u0d2a\u0d26\u0d4d\u0d27\u0d24\u0d3f \u0d28\u0d3f\u0d30\u0d4d\u200d\u0d23\u0d4d\u0d23\u0d2f\u0d3f\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d3e\u0d35\u0d41\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28\u0d24\u0d3e\u0d23\u0d4d\u200c.", + "2007_56_32_10/ML": "(3) \u0d08 \u0d06\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d31\u0d4d\u0d31\u0d4d\u200c \u0d2a\u0d4d\u0d30\u0d15\u0d3e\u0d30\u0d02 \u0d09\u0d23\u0d4d\u0d1f\u0d3e\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d3f\u0d2f\u0d3f\u0d1f\u0d4d\u0d1f\u0d41\u0d33\u0d4d\u0d33 \u0d13\u0d30\u0d4b \u0d1a\u0d1f\u0d4d\u0d1f\u0d35\u0d41\u0d02 \u0d05\u0d24\u0d4d\u200c \u0d09\u0d23\u0d4d\u0d1f\u0d3e\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d3f\u0d2f\u0d36\u0d47\u0d37\u0d02 \u0d06\u0d15\u0d41\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d30 \u0d35\u0d47\u0d17\u0d02 \u0d38\u0d02\u0d38\u0d4d\u0d25\u0d3e\u0d28 \u0d28\u0d3f\u0d2f\u0d2e\u0d28\u0d3f\u0d30\u0d4d\u200d\u0d2e\u0d4d\u0d2e\u0d3e\u0d23\u0d2e\u0d23\u0d4d\u0d21\u0d32\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d24\u0d3f\u0d28\u0d4d\u200c \u0d30\u0d23\u0d4d\u0d1f\u0d41 \u0d38\u0d2d\u0d15\u0d33\u0d4d\u200d \u0d09\u0d33\u0d4d\u0d33\u0d3f\u0d1f\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d24\u0d4d\u200c \u0d13\u0d30\u0d4b \u0d38\u0d2d\u0d2f\u0d41\u0d1f\u0d46\u0d2f\u0d41\u0d02 \u0d2e\u0d41\u0d2e\u0d4d\u0d2a\u0d3e\u0d15\u0d46\u0d2f\u0d41\u0d02 \u0d05\u0d19\u0d4d\u0d19\u0d28\u0d46\u0d2f\u0d41\u0d33\u0d4d\u0d33 \u0d28\u0d3f\u0d2f\u0d2e\u0d28\u0d3f\u0d30\u0d4d\u200d\u0d2e\u0d4d\u0d2e\u0d3e\u0d23\u0d2e\u0d23\u0d4d\u0d21\u0d32\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d24\u0d3f\u0d28\u0d4d\u200c \u0d12\u0d30\u0d41 \u0d38\u0d2d \u0d09\u0d33\u0d4d\u0d33\u0d3f\u0d1f\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d24\u0d4d\u200c \u0d06 \u0d38\u0d2d\u0d2f\u0d41\u0d1f\u0d46 \u0d2e\u0d41\u0d2e\u0d4d\u0d2a\u0d3e\u0d15\u0d46\u0d2f\u0d41\u0d02 \u0d35\u0d2f\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d47\u0d23\u0d4d\u0d1f\u0d24\u0d3e\u0d23\u0d4d\u200c.", + "2006_4_21_3/ML": "(3) \u0d38\u0d02\u0d38\u0d4d\u0d25\u0d3e\u0d28 \u0d15\u0d2e\u0d4d\u0d2e\u0d40\u0d37\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d31\u0d46 \u0d06\u0d35\u0d36\u0d4d\u0d2f\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d24\u0d3f\u0d28\u0d41\u0d35\u0d47\u0d23\u0d4d\u0d1f\u0d3f \u0d28\u0d3f\u0d2f\u0d2e\u0d3f\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d2a\u0d4d\u0d2a\u0d46\u0d1f\u0d4d\u0d1f \u0d38\u0d46\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d30\u0d1f\u0d4d\u0d1f\u0d31\u0d3f\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d41\u0d02 \u0d2e\u0d31\u0d4d\u0d31\u0d4d \u0d09\u0d26\u0d4d\u0d2f\u0d4b\u0d17\u0d38\u0d4d\u0d25\u0d7c\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d41\u0d02 \u0d1c\u0d40\u0d35\u0d28\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d3e\u0d7c\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d41\u0d02 \u0d28\u0d7d\u0d15\u0d47\u0d23\u0d4d\u0d1f \u0d36\u0d2e\u0d4d\u0d2a\u0d33\u0d35\u0d41\u0d02 \u0d2c\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d24\u0d15\u0d33\u0d41\u0d02 \u0d2e\u0d31\u0d4d\u0d31\u0d4d \u0d38\u0d47\u0d35\u0d28\u0d35\u0d4d\u0d2f\u0d35\u0d38\u0d4d\u0d25\u0d15\u0d33\u0d41\u0d02 \u0d28\u0d3f\u0d2c\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d27\u0d28\u0d15\u0d33\u0d41\u0d02 \u0d38\u0d02\u0d38\u0d4d\u0d25\u0d3e\u0d28 \u0d38\u0d7c\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d3e\u0d30\u0d3f\u0d28\u0d3e\u0d7d \u0d28\u0d3f\u0d7c\u0d23\u0d4d\u0d23\u0d2f\u0d3f\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d2a\u0d4d\u0d2a\u0d46\u0d1f\u0d3e\u0d35\u0d41\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28 \u0d2a\u0d4d\u0d30\u0d15\u0d3e\u0d30\u0d2e\u0d3e\u0d2f\u0d3f\u0d30\u0d3f\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d47\u0d23\u0d4d\u0d1f\u0d24\u0d3e\u0d23\u0d4d.", + "2007_56_4_4/ML": "(4) \u0d12\u0d30\u0d41 \u0d2e\u0d41\u0d24\u0d3f\u0d30\u0d4d\u200d\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28 \u0d2a\u0d08\u0d30\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d31\u0d46 \u0d12\u0d30\u0d41 \u0d2c\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d27\u0d41\u0d35\u0d41\u0d02 \u0d2e\u0d24\u0d3f\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d2f \u0d27\u0d28\u0d3e\u0d17\u0d2e \u0d2e\u0d3e\u0d30\u0d4d\u200d\u0d17\u0d4d\u0d17\u0d19\u0d4d\u0d19\u0d33\u0d41\u0d33\u0d4d\u0d33\u0d24\u0d41\u0d2e\u0d3e\u0d2f \u0d0f\u0d24\u0d46\u0d19\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d3f\u0d32\u0d41\u0d02 \u0d06\u0d33\u0d4d\u200d, \u0d05\u0d19\u0d4d\u0d19\u0d28\u0d46\u0d2f\u0d41\u0d33\u0d4d\u0d33 \u0d2e\u0d41\u0d24\u0d3f\u0d30\u0d4d\u200d\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28 \u0d2a\u0d4c\u0d30\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d31\u0d46 \u0d35\u0d38\u0d4d\u0d24\u0d41 \u0d05\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d4d\u200d \u0d15\u0d48\u0d35\u0d36\u0d02 \u0d35\u0d1a\u0d4d\u0d1a\u0d3f\u0d30\u0d3f\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d41\u0d15\u0d2f\u0d4b, \u0d05\u0d19\u0d4d\u0d19\u0d28\u0d46\u0d2f\u0d41\u0d33\u0d4d\u0d33 \u0d2e\u0d41\u0d24\u0d3f\u0d30\u0d4d\u200d\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28 \u0d2a\u0d28\u0d30\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d31\u0d46 \u0d35\u0d38\u0d4d\u0d24\u0d41\u0d35\u0d3f\u0d32\u0d4d\u200d \u0d05\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d4d\u200d\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d4d\u200c \u0d05\u0d28\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d24\u0d30\u0d3e\u0d35\u0d15\u0d3e\u0d36\u0d02 \u0d09\u0d23\u0d4d\u0d1f\u0d3e\u0d2f\u0d3f\u0d30\u0d3f \u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d41\u0d15\u0d2f\u0d4b \u0d1a\u0d46\u0d2f\u0d4d\u0d2f\u0d41\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28\u0d2a\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d37\u0d02, \u0d05\u0d19\u0d4d\u0d19\u0d28\u0d46\u0d2f\u0d41\u0d33\u0d4d\u0d33 \u0d2e\u0d41\u0d24\u0d3f\u0d30\u0d4d\u200d\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d28 \u0d2a\u0d4c\u0d30\u0d28\u0d46 \u0d38\u0d02\u0d30\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d37\u0d3f\u0d15\u0d4d\u0d15\u0d47 \u0d23\u0d4d\u0d1f\u0d24\u0d3e\u0d23\u0d4d\u200c:", + "2008_34_16_5/MR": "(\u0969) \u092f\u093e \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0928\u093f\u092f\u092e\u093e\u091a\u094d\u092f\u093e \u0907\u0924\u0930 \u0924\u0930\u0924\u0941\u0926\u0940\u0902\u0928\u093e \u0905\u0927\u0940\u0928 \u0930\u093e\u0939\u0942\u0928, \u0935\u093f\u0936\u0947\u0937 \u0928\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092f\u093e\u0932\u092f\u093e\u0932\u093e, \u0915\u094b\u0923\u0924\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0939\u0940 \u0905\u092a\u0930\u093e\u0935\u093e\u091a\u0940 \u0928\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092f\u091a\u094c\u0915\u0936\u0940 \u0915\u0930\u0923\u094d\u092f\u093e\u091a\u094d\u092f\u093e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u092f\u094b\u091c\u0928\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0925, \u0938\u0924\u094d\u0930 \u0928\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092f\u093e\u0932\u092f\u093e\u091a\u0947 \u0938\u0930\u094d\u0935 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930 \u0905\u0938\u0924\u0940\u0932 \u0906\u0923\u093f \u0924\u0947 \u0935\u093f\u0936\u0947\u0937 \u0928\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092f\u093e\u0932\u092f \u091c\u0923\u0942 \u0915'\u0939\u0940 \u0938\u0924\u094d\u0930 \u0928\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092f\u093e\u0932\u092f \u0939\u094b\u0924\u0947, \u0905\u0938\u0947 \u092e\u093e\u0928\u0942\u0928, \u0938\u0924\u094d\u0930 \u0928\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092f\u093e\u0932\u092f\u093e\u0938\u092e\u094b\u0930\u0940\u0932 \u0928\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092f\u091a\u094c\u0915\u0936\u0940\u0938\u093e\u0920\u0940 \u0938\u0902\u0939\u093f\u0924\u0947\u092e\u0927\u094d\u092f\u0947 \u092c\u093f\u0939\u093f\u0924 \u0915\u0947\u0932\u0947\u0932\u094d\u092f\u093e \u0915\u0930\u094d\u092f\u092a\u0926\u094d\u0927\u0924\u0940\u0928\u0941\u0938\u093e\u0930, \u0936\u0915\u094d\u200d\u092f \u0905\u0938\u0947\u0932 \u0924\u0947\u0925\u092c\u0930, \u0905\u0902\u0936\u093e \u0905\u092a\u094d\u0930\u093e\u0927\u093e\u091a\u0940 \u0928\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092f\u091a\u094c\u0915\u0936\u0940 \u0915\u0930\u0940\u0932.", + "2008_34_6_6/MR": "(\u096c) \u092a\u094b\u091f\u0915\u0932\u092e (\u096a) \u0915\u093f\u0902\u092c\u093e \u092a\u094b\u091f\u0915\u0932\u092e (\u096b) \u0905\u0928\u094d\u0935\u092f\u0947 \u0915\u094b\u0923\u0924\u093e\u0939\u0940 \u0928\u093f\u0926\u0947\u0936 \u0926\u0947\u0923\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0924 \u0906\u0932\u0947\u0932\u093e \u0905\u0938\u0947\u0932 \u0924\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092c\u093e\u092c\u0924\u0940\u0924, \u0930\u093e\u091c\u094d\u092f \u0936\u093e\u0938\u0928 \u092c \u0905\u092a\u0930\u093e\u0927\u093e\u091a\u0947 \u0905\u0928\u094d\u0935\u0947\u0937\u0923 \u0915\u0930\u0923\u093e\u0930\u093e \u0930\u093e\u091c\u094d\u092f \u0936\u093e\u0938\u0928\u093e\u091a\u093e \u0915\u094b\u0923\u0924\u093e\u0939\u0940 \u092a\u094b\u0932\u0940\u0938 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0940, \u0905\u0928\u094d\u0935\u0947\u0937\u0923\u093e\u091a\u094d\u092f\u093e \u0938\u0902\u092c\u0902\u0927\u093e\u0924 \u0915\u093e\u0930\u094d\u092f\u092c\u093e\u0939\u0940 \u0915\u0930\u0923\u093e\u0930 \u0928\u093e\u0939\u0940 \u0906\u0923\u093f \u0938\u0902\u092c\u0902\u0927\u093f\u0924 \u0926\u0938\u094d\u0924\u0910\u092c\u091c \u092c \u0905\u092d\u093f\u0932\u0947\u0916 \u0905\u092d\u093f\u0915\u0930\u0923\u093e\u0915\u0921\u0947 \u0924\u093e\u0924\u094d\u0915\u093e\u0933 \u092a\u093e\u0920\u0935\u0940\u0932.", + "2007_56_4_4/MR": "(\u096a) \u091c\u094d\u092f\u0947\u0937\u094d\u0920 \u0928\u093e\u0917\u0930\u093f\u0915\u093e\u091a\u093e \u0928\u093e\u0924\u0947\u092c\u093e\u0908\u0915 \u0905\u0938\u0923\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u092c \u0909\u0924\u094d\u092a\u0928\u094d\u0928\u093e\u091a\u0940 \u092a\u0941\u0930\u0947\u0936\u0940 \u0938\u093e\u0927\u0928\u0947 \u0905\u0938\u0923\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0915\u094b\u0923\u0924\u0940\u0939\u0940 \u0935\u094d\u092f\u0915\u094d\u200d\u0924\u0940, \u091c\u0930 \u0905\u0936\u093e \u091c\u094d\u092f\u0947\u0937\u094d\u0920 \u0928\u093e\u0917\u0930\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0902\u091a\u094d\u092f\u093e \u092e\u093e\u0932\u092e\u0924\u094d\u0924\u0947\u091a\u093e \u0915\u092c\u094d\u091c\u093e \u0924\u093f\u091a\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0915\u0921\u0947 \u0905\u0938\u0947\u0932 \u0915\u093f\u0902\u092c\u093e \u0905\u0936\u093e \u091c\u094d\u092f\u0947\u0937\u094d\u0920 \u0928\u093e\u0917\u0930\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0902\u091a\u0940 \u092e\u093e\u0932\u092e\u0924\u094d\u0924\u093e \u0924\u093f\u0932\u093e \u0935\u093e\u0930\u0936\u093e\u0928\u0947 \u092e\u093f\u0933\u0923\u093e\u0930 \u0905\u0938\u0947\u0932 \u0924\u0930, \u0905\u0936\u093e \u091c\u094d\u092f\u0947\u0937\u094d\u0920 \u0928\u093e\u0917\u0930\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0902\u091a\u093e \u0928\u093f\u0930\u094d\u0935\u093e\u0939 \u0915\u0930\u0940\u0932 :", + "2007_56_14_1/MR": "\u096f\u096a. \u090f\u0916\u093e\u0926\u0947 \u0928\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092f\u093e\u0927\u093f\u0915\u0930\u0923 \u092f\u093e \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0928\u093f\u092f\u092e\u093e\u0928\u094d\u0935\u092f\u0947 \u0928\u093f\u0930\u094d\u0935\u093e\u0939 \u0916\u0930\u094d\u091a \u0926\u0947\u0923\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0938\u0902\u092c\u0902\u0927\u0940\u091a\u093e \u0906\u0926\u0947\u0936 \u0926\u0947\u0908\u0932 \u0924\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092c\u093e\u092c\u0924\u0940\u0924, \u0905\u0936\u093e \u0928\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092f\u093e\u0927\u093f\u0915\u0930\u0923\u093e\u0932\u093e, \u0928\u093f\u0930\u094d\u0935\u093e\u0939 \u0916\u0930\u094d\u091a\u093e\u091a\u094d\u092f\u093e \u0930\u0915\u092e\u0947\u0938\u094b\u092c\u0924, \u0928\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092f\u093e\u0927\u093f\u0915\u0930\u0923 \u0920\u0930\u0935\u0940\u0932 \u0905\u0936\u093e \u0926\u0930\u093e\u0928\u0947 \u0906\u0923\u093f \u0905\u0930\u094d\u091c \u0915\u0930\u0923\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0924 \u0906\u0932\u094d\u092f\u093e\u091a\u094d\u092f\u093e \u0926\u093f\u0928\u093e\u0902\u0915\u093e\u091a\u094d\u092f\u093e \u0905\u0917\u094b\u0926\u0930\u091a\u0940 \u0928\u0938\u0947\u0932 \u0905\u0936\u093e \u0926\u093f\u0928\u093e\u0902\u0915\u093e\u092a\u093e\u0938\u0942\u0928, \u0938\u0930\u0933\u0935\u094d\u092f\u093e\u091c \u0926\u0947\u0923\u094d\u092f\u093e\u091a\u093e\u0939\u0940 \u0928\u093f\u0926\u0947\u0936 \u0926\u0947\u0924\u093e \u092f\u0947\u0908\u0932, \u092e\u093e\u0924\u094d\u0930, \u0924\u094d\u092f\u093e \u0935\u094d\u092f\u093e\u091c\u093e\u091a\u093e \u0926\u0930 \u092a\u093e\u0924\u094d\u0930 \u091f\u0915\u094d\u0915\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0902\u0939\u0942\u0928 \u0915\u092e\u0940 \u0928\u0938\u0947\u0932 \u092c \u0905\u0920\u0930\u093e \u091f\u0915\u094d\u0915\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0902\u0939\u0942\u0928 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915 \u0928\u0938\u0947\u0932 :", + "1969_18_13_1/MR": "\u0967\u0969. (\u0967) \u091c\u094d\u092f\u093e \u0915\u094b\u0923\u0924\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0939\u0940 \u091c\u0928\u094d\u092e\u093e\u091a\u0940 \u0915\u093f\u0902\u0935\u093e \u092e\u0943\u0924\u094d\u092f\u0942\u091a\u0940 \u092d\u093e\u0939\u093f\u0924\u0940 \u0924\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0915\u0930\u093f\u0924\u093e \u0935\u093f\u0928\u093f\u0926\u093f\u0937\u094d\u091f \u0915\u0947\u0933\u0947\u0932\u093e \u0915\u093e\u0932\u093e\u0935\u0927\u0940 \u0938\u0902\u092a\u0932\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0928\u0902\u0924\u0930, \u092a\u0923 \u0924\u094b \u0918\u0921\u0932\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092a\u093e\u0938\u0942\u0928 \u0924\u0940\u0938 \u0926\u093f\u0935\u0938\u093e\u0902\u091a\u094d\u092f\u093e \u0906\u0924 \u0926\u0947\u0923\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0924 \u0906\u0932\u0940 \u0905\u0938\u0947\u0932 \u0924\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0902\u091a\u0940, \u0928\u094b\u0902\u0926\u0923\u0940, \u0935\u093f\u0939\u093f\u0924 \u0915\u0930\u0923\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0924 \u092f\u0947\u0908\u0932 \u0905\u0936\u0940 \u0935\u093f\u0932\u0902\u092c-\u092b\u0940 \u092d\u0930\u0923\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0924 \u0906\u0932\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0935\u0930 \u0915\u0930\u0923\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0924 \u092f\u0947\u0908\u0932.", + "2006_4_21_3/TE": "(3) \u0c30\u0c3e\u0c1c\u0c4d\u0c2f \u0c15\u0c2e\u0c40\u0c37\u0c28\u0c41 \u0c15\u0c4a\u0c30\u0c15\u0c41 \u0c28\u0c3f\u0c2f\u0c2e\u0c3f\u0c02\u0c1a\u0c2c\u0c21\u0c3f\u0c28 \u0c15\u0c3e\u0c30\u0c4d\u0c2f\u0c26\u0c30\u0c4d\u0c36\u0c3f, \u0c07\u0c24\u0c30 \u0c05\u0c27\u0c3f\u0c15\u0c3e\u0c30\u0c41\u0c32 \u0c2e\u0c30\u0c3f\u0c2f\u0c41 \u0c09\u0c26\u0c4d\u0c2f\u0c4b\u0c17\u0c41\u0c32\u0c15\u0c41 \u0c1a\u0c46\u0c32\u0c4d\u0c32\u0c3f\u0c02\u0c1a\u0c26\u0c17\u0c41 \u0c1c\u0c40\u0c24\u0c2d\u0c24\u0c4d\u0c2f\u0c2e\u0c41\u0c32\u0c41, \u0c07\u0c24\u0c30 \u0c28\u0c3f\u0c2c\u0c02\u0c27\u0c28\u0c32\u0c41 \u0c2e\u0c30\u0c3f\u0c2f\u0c41 \u0c38\u0c47\u0c35\u0c3e\u0c37\u0c30\u0c24\u0c41\u0c32\u0c41 \u0c30\u0c3e\u0c1c\u0c4d\u0c2f \u0c2a\u0c4d\u0c30\u0c2d\u0c41\u0c24\u0c4d\u0c35\u0c2e\u0c41\u0c1a\u0c47\u0c24 \u0c35\u0c3f\u0c39\u0c3f\u0c24\u0c2a\u0c30\u0c1a\u0c2c\u0c21\u0c41\u0c28\u0c1f\u0c4d\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c3e \u0c09\u0c02\u0c21\u0c35\u0c32\u0c46\u0c28\u0c41.", + "2007_56_6_5/TE": "(3) \u0c38\u0c02\u0c24\u0c3e\u0c28\u0c2e\u0c41 \u0c32\u0c47\u0c26\u0c3e \u0c2c\u0c02\u0c27\u0c41\u0c35\u0c41\u0c28\u0c41 \u0c39\u0c3e\u0c1c\u0c30\u0c41 \u0c2a\u0c30\u0c1a\u0c41 \u0c35\u0c3f\u0c37\u0c2f\u0c2e\u0c41\u0c32\u0c4b \u0c1f\u0c4d\u0c30\u0c3f\u0c2c\u0c4d\u0c2f\u0c41\u0c28\u0c32\u0c41, \u0c15\u0c4d\u0c30\u0c3f\u0c2e\u0c3f\u0c28\u0c32\u0c41 \u0c2a\u0c4d\u0c30\u0c15\u0c4d\u0c30\u0c3f\u0c2f\u0c3e \u0c38\u0c4d\u0c2e\u0c43\u0c24\u0c3f, 1973 ((1974\u0c32\u0c4b\u0c28\u0c3f 2\u0c35\u0c26\u0c3f) \u0c15\u0c4d\u0c30\u0c3f\u0c02\u0c26 \u0c28\u0c3f\u0c2c\u0c02\u0c27\u0c3f\u0c02\u0c1a\u0c2c\u0c21\u0c3f\u0c28 \u0c35\u0c3f\u0c27\u0c2e\u0c41\u0c17\u0c3e \u0c2e\u0c4a\u0c26\u0c1f\u0c3f \u0c24\u0c30\u0c17\u0c24\u0c3f \u0c28\u0c4d\u0c2f\u0c3e\u0c2f\u0c3f\u0c15 \u0c2e\u0c47\u0c1c\u0c3f\u0c38\u0c4d\u0c1f\u0c4d\u0c30\u0c47\u0c1f\u0c41 \u0c2f\u0c4a\u0c15\u0c4d\u0c15 \u0c06\u0c27\u0c3f\u0c15\u0c3e\u0c30\u0c2e\u0c41\u0c28\u0c41 \u0c15\u0c32\u0c3f\u0c17\u0c3f \u0c09\u0c02\u0c21\u0c41\u0c28\u0c41.", + "2007_56_5_5/TE": "\u0c35\u0c3f\u0c36\u0c26\u0c40\u0c15\u0c30\u0c23:- \u0c08 \u0c2a\u0c30\u0c3f\u0c1a\u0c4d\u0c1a\u0c47\u0c26\u0c2e\u0c41 \u0c28\u0c3f\u0c2e\u0c3f\u0c24\u0c4d\u0c24\u0c2e\u0c41 \"\u0c35\u0c4d\u0c2f\u0c35\u0c38\u0c4d\u0c25 \u0c06\u0c28\u0c17\u0c3e \u0c38\u0c02\u0c18\u0c2e\u0c41\u0c32 \u0c30\u0c3f\u0c1c\u0c3f\u0c38\u0c4d\u0c1f\u0c4d\u0c30\u0c40\u0c15\u0c30\u0c23 \u0c1a\u0c1f\u0c4d\u0c1f\u0c2e\u0c41, 1860 (1860\u0c32\u0c4b\u0c28\u0c3f 21\u0c35\u0c26\u0c3f) \u0c32\u0c47\u0c26\u0c3e \u0c24\u0c24\u0c4d\u0c38\u0c2e\u0c2f\u0c2e\u0c41\u0c28 \u0c05\u0c2e\u0c32\u0c41\u0c28\u0c02\u0c26\u0c41\u0c28\u0c4d\u0c28 \u0c0f\u0c26\u0c47\u0c28\u0c3f \u0c07\u0c24\u0c30 \u0c36\u0c3e\u0c38\u0c28\u0c2e\u0c41 \u0c15\u0c4d\u0c30\u0c3f\u0c02\u0c26 \u0c30\u0c3f\u0c1c\u0c3f\u0c38\u0c4d\u0c1f\u0c30\u0c48\u0c28 \u0c0f\u0c26\u0c47\u0c28\u0c3f \u0c38\u0c4d\u0c35\u0c1a\u0c4d\u0c1a\u0c02\u0c26 \u0c35\u0c4d\u0c2f\u0c35\u0c38\u0c4d\u0c25 \u0c05\u0c28\u0c3f \u0c05\u0c30\u0c4d\u0c25\u0c2e\u0c41;", + "2006_4_19_3/TE": "\u0c05\u0c02\u0c24\u0c47\u0c15\u0c3e\u0c15\u0c41\u0c02\u0c21\u0c3e, '\u0c1b\u0c48\u0c30\u0c4d-\u0c2a\u0c30\u0c4d\u0c38\u0c28\u0c4d \u0c05\u0c2f\u0c3f\u0c28\u0c28\u0c41 \u0c32\u0c47\u0c15 \u0c0e\u0c35\u0c30\u0c47\u0c28\u0c3f \u0c07\u0c24\u0c30 \u0c38\u0c2d\u0c4d\u0c2f\u0c41\u0c21\u0c48\u0c28\u0c28\u0c41 \u0c05\u0c24\u0c21\u0c41,- (\u0c0e) \u0c1b\u0c48\u0c30\u0c4d-\u0c2a\u0c30\u0c4d\u0c38\u0c28\u0c4d \u0c35\u0c3f\u0c37\u0c2f\u0c2e\u0c41\u0c32\u0c4b \u0c05\u0c30\u0c41\u0c35\u0c26\u0c3f \u0c05\u0c2f\u0c3f\u0c26\u0c41 \u0c38\u0c02\u0c35\u0c24\u0c4d\u0c38\u0c30\u0c2e\u0c41\u0c32 \u0c35\u0c2f\u0c38\u0c4d\u0c38\u0c41; \u0c2e\u0c30\u0c3f\u0c2f\u0c41 (\u0c2c\u0c3f) \u0c38\u0c2d\u0c4d\u0c2f\u0c41\u0c28\u0c3f \u0c35\u0c3f\u0c37\u0c2f\u0c2e\u0c41\u0c32\u0c4b \u0c05\u0c30\u0c41\u0c35\u0c26\u0c3f \u0c38\u0c02\u0c35\u0c24\u0c4d\u0c38\u0c30\u0c2e\u0c41\u0c32 \u0c35\u0c2f\u0c38\u0c4d\u0c38\u0c41, \u0c35\u0c1a\u0c4d\u0c1a\u0c3f\u0c28 \u0c2e\u0c40\u0c26\u0c1f \u0c05\u0c1f\u0c4d\u0c1f\u0c3f \u0c2a\u0c26\u0c35\u0c3f\u0c32\u0c4b \u0c09\u0c02\u0c21\u0c30\u0c3e\u0c26\u0c41.", + "2007_56_6_8/TE": "(5) \u0c38\u0c02\u0c24\u0c3e\u0c28\u0c2e\u0c41 \u0c32\u0c47\u0c26\u0c3e \u0c2c\u0c02\u0c27\u0c41\u0c35\u0c41 \u0c2d\u0c3e\u0c30\u0c24\u0c26\u0c47\u0c36\u0c2e\u0c41\u0c28\u0c15\u0c41 \u0c35\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c2a\u0c32 \u0c28\u0c3f\u0c35\u0c38\u0c3f\u0c38\u0c4d\u0c24\u0c41\u0c28\u0c4d\u0c28 \u0c2f\u0c46\u0c21\u0c32, \u0c15\u0c47\u0c02\u0c26\u0c4d\u0c30\u0c2a\u0c4d\u0c30\u0c2d\u0c41\u0c24\u0c4d\u0c35\u0c4d\u0c2f\u0c4d\u0c35\u0c2e\u0c41 \u0c05\u0c27\u0c3f\u0c15\u0c3e\u0c30 \u0c30\u0c3e\u0c1c\u0c2a\u0c24\u0c4d\u0c30\u0c2e\u0c41\u0c32\u0c4b \u0c05\u0c27\u0c3f\u0c38\u0c42\u0c1a\u0c28 -\u0c26\u0c4d\u0c35\u0c4d\u0c2f\u0c3e\u0c30\u0c3e \u0c08 \u0c35\u0c3f\u0c37\u0c2f\u0c2e\u0c41\u0c32\u0c4b \u0c28\u0c3f\u0c30\u0c4d\u0c26\u0c3f\u0c37\u0c4d\u0c1f \u0c2a\u0c30\u0c1a\u0c41\u0c28\u0c1f\u0c4d\u0c1f\u0c3f \u0c2a\u0c4d\u0c30\u0c3e\u0c27\u0c3f\u0c15\u0c3e\u0c30\u0c3f \u0c26\u0c4d\u0c35\u0c3e\u0c30\u0c3e \u0c1f\u0c4d\u0c30\u0c3f\u0c2c\u0c4d\u0c2f\u0c41\u0c28\u0c32\u0c41\u0c1a\u0c47 \u0c38\u0c2e\u0c28\u0c41\u0c32\u0c28\u0c41 \u0c06\u0c02\u0c26 \u0c1a\u0c47\u0c2f\u0c3f\u0c02\u0c1a\u0c35\u0c32\u0c46\u0c28\u0c41.", + "1969_18_27_1/PA": "27. \u0a30\u0a3e\u0a1c \u0a38\u0a30\u0a15\u0a3e\u0a30, \u0a30\u0a40 \u0a17\u0a41\u0a1c\u0a3c\u0a23 \u0a35\u0a3f\u0a71\u0a1a \u0a05\u0a27\u0a3f\u0a38\u0a42\u0a1a\u0a28\u0a3e \u0a26\u0a41\u0a06\u0a30\u0a3e, \u0a07\u0a39 \u0a28\u0a3f\u0a26\u0a47\u0a38\u0a3c \u0a26\u0a47 \u0a38\u0a15\u0a47\u0a17\u0a40 \u0a15\u0a3f \u0a07\u0a38 \u0a10\u0a15\u0a1f \u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a02 \u0a07\u0a38 \u0a05\u0a27\u0a40\u0a28 \u0a2c\u0a23\u0a3e\u0a0f \u0a17\u0a0f \u0a28\u0a3f\u0a2f\u0a2e\u0a3e\u0a02 \u0a05\u0a27\u0a40\u0a28 \u0a09\u0a38 \u0a26\u0a41\u0a06\u0a30\u0a3e \u0a35\u0a30\u0a24'\u0a2f\u0a4b\u0a17 \u0a15\u0a4b\u0a08 \u0a38\u0a3c\u0a15\u0a24\u0a40 (\u0a27\u0a3e\u0a30\u0a3e 30 \u0a05\u0a27\u0a40\u0a28 \u0a28\u0a3f\u0a2f\u0a2e \u0a2c\u0a23\u0a3e\u0a09\u0a23 \u0a26\u0a40 \u0a38\u0a3c\u0a15\u0a24\u0a40 \u0a26\u0a47. \u0a38\u0a3f\u0a35\u0a3e\u0a0f) \u0a05\u0a1c\u0a3f\u0a39\u0a40\u0a06\u0a02 \u0a38\u0a3c\u0a30\u0a24\u0a3e\u0a02 \u0a26\u0a47 \u0a24\u0a3e\u0a02\u0a2c\u0a47, \u0a1c\u0a4b \u0a15\u0a4b\u0a08 \u0a39\u0a4b\u0a23, \u0a1c\u0a4c \u0a28\u0a3f\u0a26\u0a47\u0a38\u0a3c \u0a35\u0a3f\u0a71\u0a1a \u0a09\u0a32\u0a3f\u0a16\u0a24 \u0a15\u0a40\u0a24\u0a40\u0a06\u0a02 \u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a23, \u0a30\u0a3e\u0a1c \u0a38\u0a30\u0a15\u0a3e\u0a30 \u0a26\u0a47 \u0a05\u0a27\u0a40\u0a28 \u0a05\u0a1c\u0a3f\u0a39\u0a47 \u0a05\u0a2b\u0a3c\u0a38\u0a30 ` \u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a02 \u0a05\u0a25\u0a30\u0a3f\u0a1f\u0a40 \u0a26\u0a41\u0a06\u0a30\u0a3e \u0a35\u0a40 \u0a35\u0a30\u0a24\u0a4c\u0a2f\u0a4b\u0a17 \u0a39\u0a4b\u0a35\u0a47\u0a17\u0a40, \u0a1c\u0a4b \u0a28\u0a3f\u0a26\u0a47\u0a38\u0a3c \u0a35\u0a3f\u0a71\u0a1a \u0a09\u0a32\u0a3f\u0a16\u0a24 \u0a15\u0a40\u0a24\u0a40 \u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a35\u0a47 \u0964", + "1976_19_27_2/PA": "(2) \u0a05\u0a1c\u0a3f\u0a39\u0a47 \u0a28\u0a3f\u0a30\u0a38\u0a28 \u0a26\u0a47 \u0a39\u0a41\u0a70\u0a26\u0a3f\u0a06\u0a02 \u0a39\u0a4b\u0a07\u0a06 \u0a35\u0a40 \u0a09\u0a15\u0a24 \u0a14\u0a30\u0a21\u0a40\u0a28\u0a48\u0a02\u0a38 \u0a05\u0a27\u0a40\u0a28 \u0a15\u0a40\u0a24\u0a40 \u0a17\u0a08 \u0a15\u0a4b\u0a08 \u0a17\u0a71\u0a32 \u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a02 \u0a15\u0a3e\u0a30\u0a35\u0a3e\u0a08 (\u0a1c\u0a3f\u0a38 \u0a35\u0a3f\u0a71\u0a1a \u0a15\u0a4b\u0a08 \u0a2a\u0a4d\u0a30\u0a15\u0a3e\u0a38\u0a3c\u0a24 \u0a15\u0a40\u0a24\u0a40 \u0a17\u0a08 \u0a05\u0a27\u0a3f\u0a38\u0a42\u0a1a\u0a28\u0a3e, \u0a26\u0a3f\u0a71\u0a24\u0a3e \u0a17\u0a3f\u0a06 \u0a28\u0a3f\u0a26\u0a47\u0a38\u0a3c, \u0a15\u0a40\u0a24\u0a40 \u0a17\u0a08 \u0a28\u0a3e\u0a2e\u0a1c\u0a3c\u0a26\u0a17\u0a40, \u0a2a\u0a4d\u0a30\u0a26\u0a3e\u0a28 \u0a15\u0a40\u0a24\u0a40 \u0a38\u0a3c\u0a15\u0a24\u0a40, \u0a05\u0a30\u0a4b\u0a2a\u0a3f\u0a06 \u0a15\u0a30\u0a24\u0a71\u0a35 \u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a02 \u0a09\u0a32\u0a3f\u0a16\u0a24 \u0a05\u0a2b\u0a3c\u0a38\u0a30 \u0a38\u0a3c\u0a3e\u0a2e\u0a32 \u0a39\u0a48) \u0a07\u0a38 \u0a10\u0a15\u0a1f \u0a26\u0a47 \u0a24\u0a24\u0a38\u0a25\u0a3e\u0a28\u0a40 \u0a09\u0a2a\u0a2c\u0a70\u0a27\u0a3e\u0a02 \u0a05\u0a27\u0a40\u0a28 \u0a15\u0a40\u0a24\u0a40 \u0a17\u0a08 \u0a38\u0a2e\u0a1d\u0a40 \u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a35\u0a47\u0a17\u0a40 \u0964", + "1969_18_8_5/PA": "(\u0a38) \u0a15\u0a3f\u0a38\u0a47 \u0a1a\u0a3e\u0a35\u0a5c), \u0a1b\u0a24\u0a30, \u0a39\u0a4c\u0a38\u0a1f\u0a32, \u0a27\u0a30\u0a2e\u0a38\u0a3c\u0a3e\u0a32\u0a3e, \u0a2c\u0a4b\u0a30\u0a21\u0a3f\u0a70\u0a17 \u0a39\u0a3e\u0a0a\u0a38, \u0a30\u0a3f\u0a39\u0a3e\u0a07\u0a38\u0a3c \u0a18\u0a30, \u0a38\u0a30\u0a3e\u0a02, \u0a2c\u0a48\u0a30\u0a15, \u0a24\u0a3e\u0a5c\u0a40\u0a16\u0a3c\u0a3e\u0a28\u0a47 \u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a02 \u0a32\u0a4c\u0a15 \u0a38\u0a2e\u0a3e\u0a17\u0a2e \u0a26\u0a40 \u0a25\u0a3e\u0a02 \u0a35\u0a3f\u0a71\u0a1a \u0a1c\u0a28\u0a2e\u0a3e\u0a02 \u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a02 \u0a2e\u0a4c\u0a24\u0a3e\u0a02 \u0a2c\u0a3e\u0a30\u0a47, \u0a09\u0a25\u0a4b\u0a02 \u0a26\u0a3e \u0a07\u0a28\u0a1a\u0a3e\u0a30\u0a1c \u0a35\u0a3f\u0a05\u0a15\u0a24\u0a40;", + "1969_18_32_1/PA": "32. \u0a1c\u0a47 \u0a07\u0a38 \u0a10\u0a15\u0a1f \u0a26\u0a47 \u0a09\u0a2a\u0a2c\u0a70\u0a27\u0a3e\u0a02 \u0a28\u0a42\u0a70 \u0a15\u0a3f\u0a38\u0a47 \u0a30\u0a3e\u0a1c \u0a35\u0a3f\u0a71\u0a1a \u0a2a\u0a4d\u0a30\u0a2d\u0a3e\u0a35\u0a40 \u0a2c\u0a23\u0a3e\u0a09\u0a23 \u0a35\u0a3f\u0a71\u0a1a, \u0a09\u0a28\u0a4d\u0a39\u0a3e\u0a02 \u0a26\u0a47 \u0a15\u0a3f\u0a38\u0a47 \u0a16\u0a47\u0a21\u0a30 \u0a28\u0a42\u0a70 \u0a32\u0a3e\u0a17\u0a42 \u0a15\u0a30\u0a28 \u0a35\u0a3f\u0a71\u0a1a \u0a15\u0a4b\u0a08 \u0a15\u0a20\u0a28\u0a3e\u0a08 \u0a2a\u0a48\u0a26\u0a3e \u0a39\u0a41\u0a70\u0a26\u0a40 \u0a39\u0a48 \u0a24\u0a3e\u0a02 \u0a30\u0a3e\u0a1c.\u0a38\u0a30\u0a15\u0a3e\u0a30,\u0a15\u0a47\u0a02\u0a26\u0a30\u0a40 \u0a38\u0a30\u0a15\u0a3e\u0a30 \u0a26\u0a40 \u0a2a\u0a30\u0a35\u0a3e\u0a28\u0a17\u0a40 \u0a28\u0a3e\u0a32, \u0a39\u0a41\u0a15\u0a2e \u0a26\u0a41\u0a06\u0a30\u0a3e, \u0a05\u0a1c\u0a3f\u0a39\u0a47 \u0a09\u0a2a\u0a2c\u0a70\u0a27 \u0a15\u0a30 \u0a38\u0a15\u0a47\u0a17\u0a40 \u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a02 \u0a05\u0a1c\u0a3f\u0a39\u0a47 \u0a28\u0a3f\u0a26\u0a47\u0a38\u0a3c \u0a26\u0a47 \u0a38\u0a15\u0a47\u0a17\u0a40 \u0a1c\u0a4b \u0a07\u0a38 \u0a10\u0a15\u0a1f \u0a26\u0a47 \u0a09\u0a2a\u0a2c\u0a70\u0a27\u0a3e\u0a02 \u0a28\u0a3e\u0a32 \u0a05\u0a38\u0a48\u0a17\u0a24 \u0a28 \u0a39\u0a4b\u0a23 \u0a05\u0a24\u0a47 \u0a09\u0a38 \u0a15\u0a20\u0a28\u0a3e\u0a08 \u0a28\u0a42\u0a70 \u0a26\u0a42\u0a30 \u0a15\u0a30\u0a28 \u0a32\u0a08 \u0a30\u0a3e\u0a1c \u0a38\u0a30\u0a15\u0a3e\u0a30 \u0a28\u0a42\u0a70 \u0a1c\u0a3c\u0a30\u0a42\u0a30\u0a40 \u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a02 \u0a39\u0a3e\u0a32\u0a3e\u0a02\u0a24 \u0a05\u0a28\u0a41\u0a38\u0a3e\u0a30 \u0a09\u0a1a\u0a3f\u0a24 \u0a2a\u0a4d\u0a30\u0a24\u0a40\u0a24 \u0a39\u0a4b\u0a23 :", + "1976_19_14_7/PA": "(\u0a15) \u0a38\u0a41\u0a24\u0a70\u0a24\u0a30 \u0a15\u0a40\u0a24\u0a47 \u0a17\u0a0f \u0a2c\u0a70\u0a27\u0a24 \u0a2e\u0a1c\u0a3c\u0a26\u0a42\u0a30 \u0a26\u0a47 \u0a35\u0a3f\u0a30\u0a41\u0a71\u0a27, \u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a02 \u0a09\u0a38\u0a26\u0a47 \u0a2a\u0a30\u0a3f\u0a35\u0a3e\u0a30 \u0a26\u0a47 \u0a15\u0a3f\u0a38\u0a47 \u0a2e\u0a48\u0a02\u0a2c\u0a30 \u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a02 \u0a09\u0a38\u0a24\u0a47 \u0a06\u0a38\u0a30\u0a3f\u0a24 \u0a15\u0a3f\u0a38\u0a47 \u0a39\u0a4b\u0a30 \u0a35\u0a3f\u0a05\u0a15\u0a24\u0a40 \u0a26\u0a47 \u0a35\u0a3f\u0a30\u0a41\u0a71\u0a27 \u0a26\u0a3e\u0a07\u0a30 \u0a15\u0a40\u0a24\u0a47 \u0a17\u0a0f \u0a15\u0a3f\u0a38\u0a47 \u0a05\u0a1c\u0a3f\u0a39\u0a47 \u0a26\u0a3e\u0a35\u0a47 \u0a26\u0a40 \u0a1c\u0a35\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a26\u0a3f\u0a39\u0a40 \u0a15\u0a30\u0a28\u0a3e, \u0a1c\u0a4b \u0a15\u0a3f\u0a38\u0a47 \u0a2c\u0a70\u0a27\u0a24 \u0a30\u0a3f\u0a23 \u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a02 \u0a15\u0a3f\u0a38\u0a47 \u0a05\u0a1c\u0a3f\u0a39\u0a47 \u0a39\u0a4b\u0a30 \u0a30\u0a3f\u0a23 \u0a26\u0a40 \u0a2a\u0a42\u0a30\u0a23 \u0a24\u0a4c\u0a30 \u0a24\u0a47 \u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a02 \u0a09\u0a38\u0a26\u0a47 \u0a15\u0a3f\u0a38\u0a47 \u0a2d\u0a3e\u0a17 \u0a26\u0a40 \u0a35\u0a38\u0a42\u0a32\u0a40 \u0a32\u0a08 \u0a39\u0a4b\u0a35\u0a47 \u0a1c\u0a3f\u0a38 \u0a26\u0a47 \u0a2c\u0a3e\u0a30\u0a47 \u0a05\u0a1c\u0a3f\u0a39\u0a47 \u0a35\u0a3f\u0a05\u0a15\u0a24\u0a40 \u0a26\u0a41\u0a06\u0a30\u0a3e \u0a26\u0a3e\u0a05\u0a35\u0a3e \u0a15\u0a40\u0a24\u0a3e \u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a02\u0a26\u0a3e \u0a39\u0a48 \u0a15\u0a3f \u0a09\u0a39 \u0a2c\u0a70\u0a27\u0a24 \u0a30\u0a3f\u0a23 \u0a39\u0a48\u0964", + "1969_18_19_1/OR": "19. (1) \u0b2a\u0b4d\u0b30\u0b24\u0b4d\u0b5f\u0b47\u0b15 \u0b30\u0b47\u0b1c\u0b3f\u0b37\u0b4d\u0b1f\u0964\u0b30, \u0b2e\u0b41\u0b16\u0b4d\u0b2f \u0b30\u0b47\u0b1c\u0b3f\u0b37\u0b4d\u0b1f\u0964\u0b30 \u0b2c\u0b3e \u0b24\u0b3e\u0b19\u0b4d\u0b15 \u0b26\u0b4d\u0b35\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b40 \u0b2c\u0b3f\u0b28\u0b3f\u0b26\u0b4d\u0b26\u0b3f\u0b37\u0b4d\u0b20 \u0b15\u0b4c\u0b23\u0b38\u0b3f \u0b05\u0b27\u0b3f\u0b15\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b40\u0b19\u0b4d\u0b15 \u0b28\u0b3f\u0b15\u0b1f\u0b15\u0b41, \u0b2f\u0b47\u0b2a\u0b30\u0b3f \u0b2c\u0b3f\u0b39\u0b3f\u0b24 \u0b39\u0b4b\u0b07\u0b2a\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b47 \u0b38\u0b47\u0b2a\u0b30\u0b3f \u0b05\u0b28\u0b4d\u0b24\u0b30\u0b3e\u0b33\u0b30\u0b47 \u0b0f\u0b2c\u0b02 \u0b38\u0b47\u0b2a\u0b30\u0b3f \u0b2b\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b2e\u0b30\u0b47, \u0b38\u0b47\u0b39\u0b3f \u0b30\u0b47\u0b1c\u0b3f\u0b37\u0b4d\u0b1f\u0964\u0b30\u0b19\u0b4d\u0b15 \u0b26\u0b4d\u0b35\u0b40\u0b30\u0b40 \u0b30\u0b16\u0b3e\u0b2f\u0b3e\u0b07\u0b25\u0b3f\u0b2c\u0b3e \u0b30\u0b47\u0b1c\u0b3f \u0b37\u0b4d\u0b1f\u0b30\u0b30 \u0b1c\u0b28\u0b4d\u0b2e \u0b13 \u0b2e\u0b43\u0b24\u0b41\u0b4d\u200c\u0b5f\u0b30 \u0b26\u0b30\u0b1c\u0b30 \u0b0f\u0b15 \u0b30\u0b3f\u0b1f\u0b30\u0b4d\u0b36 \u0b2a\u0b20\u0b3e\u0b07\u0b2c\u0b47 |", + "1976_19_23_1/OR": "23. (1) \u0b2f\u0b47\u0b2c\u0b47 \u0b0f\u0b39\u0b3f \u0b27\u0b42\u0b28\u0b3f\u0b5f\u0b2e \u0b05\u0b28\u0b41\u0b2f\u0b3e\u0b5f\u0b40 \u0b15\u0b4c\u0b23\u0b38\u0b3f \u0b05\u0b2a\u0b30\u0b27 \u0b0f\u0b15 \u0b15\u0b2e\u0b4d\u0b2a\u0b3e\u0b28\u0b3f \u0b26\u0b4d\u0b35\u0b3e\u0b30 \u0b15\u0b30\u0b2f\u0b3e\u0b0f \u0b24\u0b47\u0b2c\u0b47 \u0b05\u0b2a\u0b30\u0b27\u0b1f\u0b3f \u0b15\u0b30\u0b2f\u0b3e\u0b07\u0b25\u0b3f\u0b2c\u0b3e\u0b2c\u0b47\u0b33\u0b47 \u0b2f\u0b47\u0b09\u0b01 \u0b2c\u0b4d\u0b5f\u0b15\u0b4d\u0b24\u0b3f \u0b2e\u0b3e\u0b28\u0b47 \u0b15\u0b2e\u0b4d\u0b2a\u0b3e\u0b28\u0b3f\u0b30 \u0b15\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b2c\u0b3e\u0b30 \u0b38\u0b02\u0b38\u0b4d\u0b16\u0b33\u0b28 \u0b15\u0b30\u0b3f\u0b2c\u0b3e\u0b32\u0b17\u0b3f \u0b15\u0b2e\u0b4d\u0b2a\u0b3e\u0b28\u0b3f\u0b30 \u0b2d\u0b30\u0b2a\u0b4d\u0b30\u0b3e\u0b2a\u0b4d\u0b24 \u0b39\u0b4b\u0b07\u0b25\u0b3f\u0b32\u0b47 \u0b2c\u0b3e \u0b15\u0b2e\u0b4d\u0b2a\u0b3e\u0b28\u0b3f\u0b20\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b47 \u0b26\u0b3e\u0b5f\u0b40 \u0b25\u0b3f\u0b32\u0b47 \u0b38\u0b47\u0b39\u0b3f \u0b2a\u0b4d\u0b30\u0b24\u0b4d\u0b5f\u0b47\u0b15 \u0b2c\u0b4d\u0b5f\u0b15\u0b4d\u0b24\u0b3f \u0b24\u0b25\u0b3e \u0b38\u0b47\u0b39\u0b3f \u0b15\u0b2e\u0b4d\u0b2a\u0b3e\u0b28\u0b3f \u0b2e\u0b27\u0b4d\u0b5f \u0b05\u0b2a\u0b30\u0b27 \u0b32\u0b17\u0b3f \u0b26\u0b4b\u0b37\u0b40 \u0b2c\u0b4b\u0b32\u0b3f \u0b2c\u0b3f\u0b2c\u0b47\u0b1a\u0b3f\u0b24 \u0b39\u0b47\u0b2c\u0b47 \u0b13 \u0b24\u0b26\u0b28\u0b41\u0b38\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b47 \u0b24\u0b3e\u0b19\u0b4d\u0b15 \u0b2c\u0b3f\u0b30\u0b47\u0b27\u0b30\u0b47 \u0b15\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b4d\u0b2f\u0b4d\u0b5f\u0b2c\u0b3f\u0b27\u0b42 \u0b15\u0b17\u0b39\u0b47\u0b2c\u0b3e\u0b15\u0b41 \u0b13 \u0b38\u0b47 \u0b26\u0b23\u0b4d\u0b21\u0b3f\u0b24 \u0b39\u0b47\u0b2c\u0b3e\u0b15\u0b41 \u0b26\u0b3e\u0b5f\u0b40 \u0b30\u0b39\u0b3f\u0b2c\u0b47 \u0964", + "1969_18_23_7/OR": "(3) \u0b2f\u0b47\u0b09\u0b01 \u0b1a\u0b3f\u0b15\u0b3f\u0b38\u0b3e \u0b2c\u0b4d\u0b5f\u0b2c\u0b38\u0b3e\u0b5f\u0b40, \u0b27\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b40 10\u0b30 \u0b09\u0b2a\u0b27\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b40 (3) \u0b05\u0b28\u0b41\u0b2f\u0b3e\u0b2f\u0b4d\u0b5f \u0b2a\u0b2e\u0b3e\u0b23\u0b2a\u0b24\u0b4d\u0b24 \u0b26\u0b47\u0b2c\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b47 \u0b05\u0b2c\u0b39\u0b47\u0b33\u0b3e \u0b15\u0b30\u0b28\u0b4d\u0b24\u0b3f \u0b2c\u0b3e \u0b2e\u0b28\u0b3e \u0b15\u0b30\u0b28\u0b4d\u0b24\u0b3f, \u0b0f\u0b2c\u0b02 \u0b2f\u0b47\u0b09\u0b01 \u0b2c\u0b4d\u0b2f\u0b15\u0b4d\u0b24\u0b3f \u0b38\u0b47\u0b2a\u0b30\u0b3f \u0b2a\u0b4d\u0b24\u0b2e\u0b3e\u0b23\u0b2a\u0b24\u0b4d\u0b24 \u0b2a\u0b30\u0b3f\u0b26\u0b3e\u0b28 \u0b15\u0b30\u0b3f\u0b2c\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b47 \u0b05\u0b2c\u0b39\u0b47\u0b33\u0b3e \u0b15\u0b30\u0b28\u0b4d\u0b24\u0b3f \u0b2c\u0b3e \u0b2e\u0b28\u0b3e \u0b15\u0b30\u0b28\u0b4d\u0b24\u0b3f,. \u0b38\u0b47 \u0b2a\u0b1a\u0b43\u0b36 \u0b1f\u0b19\u0b4d\u0b15\u0b3e \u0b2a\u0b30\u0b4d\u0b2f\u0b3e\u0b28\u0b4d\u0b24 \u0b1c\u0b4b\u0b30\u0b3f\u0b2e\u0b3e\u0b28\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b47 \u0b26\u0b23\u0b4d\u0b21\u0b28\u0b40\u0b5f \u0b39\u0b47\u0b2c\u0b47 \u0964", + "1976_19_2_2/OR": "(\u0b15) \u2018\u2018\u0b05\u0b17\u0b4d\u0b30\u0b3f \u0b2e\u201d \u0b05\u0b30\u0b4d\u0b25 (\u0b0f\u0b39\u0b3e\u0b2a\u0b30\u0b47 \u0b0b\u0b23\u0b26\u0b3e\u0b24\u0b3e \u0b28\u0b3e\u0b2e\u0b30\u0b47 \u0b05\u0b2d\u0b3f\u0b39\u0b3f\u0b24 \u0b15\u0b4c\u0b23\u0b38\u0b3f \u0b2c\u0b4d\u0b5f\u0b15\u0b4d\u0b24\u0b3f\u0b19\u0b4d\u0b15 \u0b26\u0b4d\u0b2c\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b3e (\u0b0f\u0b39\u0b3e\u0b2a\u0b30\u0b47 \u0b0b\u0b23\u0b40 \u0b28\u0b3e\u0b2e\u0b30\u0b47 \u0b05\u0b2d\u0b3f\u0b39\u0b3f\u0b24) \u0b05\u0b28\u0b4d\u0b5f \u0b15\u0b4c\u0b23\u0b38\u0b3f \u0b2c\u0b4d\u0b5f\u0b15\u0b4d\u0b24\u0b3f\u0b19\u0b4d\u0b15\u0b41 \u0b28\u0b17\u0b26 \u0b06\u0b15\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b30\u0b47 \u0b39\u0b47\u0b09, \u0b05\u0b25\u0b2c\u0b3e \u0b26\u0b4d\u0b30\u0b2c\u0b4d\u0b5f \u0b06\u0b15\u0b30\u0b30\u0b47 \u0b39\u0b47\u0b09, \u0b15\u0b3f\u0b2e\u0b4d\u0b2c\u0b3e \u0b06\u0b02\u0b36\u0b3f\u0b15 \u0b28\u0b17\u0b26 \u0b06\u0b15\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b30\u0b47 \u0b15\u0b3f\u0b2e\u0b4d\u0b2c\u0b3e \u0b06\u0b02\u0b36\u0b3f\u0b15 \u0b26\u0b4d\u0b30\u0b2c\u0b4d\u0b5f \u0b06\u0b15\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b30\u0b47 \u0b39\u0b47\u0b09 \u0b26\u0b3f\u0b06\u0b2f\u0b3f\u0b2c\u0b3e \u0b05\u0b17\u0b4d\u0b30 \u0b2e;", + "1976_19_6_3/OR": "(3) \u0b2c\u0b02\u0b27\u0b42\u0b24 \u0b0b\u0b23\u0b30 \u0b05\u0b38\u0b41\u0b32 \u0b32\u0b17\u0b3f \u0b0f\u0b39\u0b3f \u0b05\u0b27\u0b42\u0b28\u0b3f \u0b5f\u0b2e\u0b30 \u0b2a\u0b4d\u0b30\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b2e\u0b4d\u0b2d \u0b2a\u0b42\u0b30\u0b4d\u0b2c\u0b30\u0b41 \u0b26\u0b3f\u0b06\u0b2f\u0b3e\u0b07\u0b25\u0b3f\u0b2c\u0b3e \u0b15\u0b3f\u0b28\u0b4d\u0b24\u0b41 \u0b38\u0b47\u0b39\u0b3f \u0b2a\u0b4d\u0b30\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b2e\u0b4d\u0b2d \u0b2a\u0b42\u0b30\u0b4d\u0b2c\u0b30\u0b41 \u0b2a\u0b42\u0b30\u0b4d\u0b37\u0b24\u0b03 \u0b36\u0b41\u0b1d\u0b3e \u0b39\u0b4b\u0b07\u0b28\u0b25\u0b3f\u0b2c\u0b3e \u0b2a\u0b4d\u0b30\u0b24\u0b4d\u0b5f\u0b47\u0b15 \u0b21\u0b3f\u0b17\u0b4d\u0b30\u0b40 \u0b2c\u0b3e \u0b06\u0b26\u0b47\u0b36, \u0b38\u0b47\u0b2a\u0b30\u0b3f \u0b2a\u0b4d\u0b30\u0b3e\u0b30\u0b2e\u0b4d\u0b2d\u0b2e\u0b3e\u0b24\u0b4d\u0b30\u0b47, \u0b2a\u0b42\u0b30\u0b4d\u0b2c\u0b24\u0b03 \u0b36\u0b41\u0b1d\u0b3e \u0b39\u0b4b\u0b07\u0b1b\u0b3f \u0b2c\u0b4b\u0b32\u0b3f \u0b2c\u0b3f\u0b2c\u0b47\u0b1a\u0b3f\u0b24 \u0b39\u0b47\u0b2c \u0964", + "1999_44_2_4/TA": "(\u0b87) \"\u0bae\u0bc2\u0bb3\u0bc8\u0b9a\u0bcd\u0b9a\u0bc0\u0bb0\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bc1\u0bb2\u0bc8\u0bb5\u0bc1\" \u0b8e\u0ba9\u0bcd\u0baa\u0ba4\u0bc1, \u0bae\u0b95\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bc7\u0bb1\u0bc1\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bc1\u0ba9\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bcb, \u0bae\u0b95\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bc7\u0bb1\u0bbf\u0ba9\u0bcd \u0baa\u0bcb\u0ba4\u0bcb, \u0b85\u0bb2\u0bcd\u0bb2\u0ba4\u0bc1 \u0b95\u0bc1\u0bb4\u0ba8\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bc8\u0bb5\u0bb3\u0bb0\u0bcd\u0b9a\u0bcd\u0b9a\u0bbf\u0baa\u0bcd \u0baa\u0bb0\u0bc1\u0bb5\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0ba9\u0bcd \u0baa\u0bcb\u0ba4\u0bcb, \u0b8f\u0bb1\u0bcd\u0baa\u0b9f\u0bc1\u0b95\u0bbf\u0bb1 \u0bae\u0bc2\u0bb3\u0bc8\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bbe\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bc1 \u0b85\u0bb2\u0bcd\u0bb2\u0ba4\u0bc1 \u0bae\u0bc2\u0bb3\u0bc8\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bbe\u0baf\u0b99\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bbf\u0ba9\u0bcd \u0b95\u0bbe\u0bb0\u0ba3\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0ba9\u0bbe\u0bb2\u0bcd, \u0b87\u0baf\u0bb2\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bc1\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bc1 \u0bae\u0bbe\u0bb1\u0bbe\u0b95 \u0ba8\u0bb0\u0bae\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bc1\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bcd \u0b92\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bc1 \u0b87\u0baf\u0b99\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bbe\u0ba4\u0ba4\u0bbe\u0bb2\u0bcd \u0ba8\u0baa\u0bb0\u0bcd \u0b92\u0bb0\u0bc1\u0bb5\u0bb0\u0bc1\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bc1 \u0b8f\u0bb1\u0bcd\u0baa\u0b9f\u0bcd\u0b9f \u0baa\u0bbe\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bc1 \u0ba4\u0bca\u0b9f\u0bb0\u0bcd\u0ba8\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0bb0\u0bc1\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd \u0ba8\u0bbf\u0bb2\u0bc8 \u0b8e\u0ba9\u0bcd\u0bb1\u0bc1 \u0baa\u0bca\u0bb0\u0bc1\u0bb3\u0bcd\u0baa\u0b9f\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd;", + "1999_44_11_8/TA": "(\u0b85) (i) \u0b9a\u0bbe\u0ba4\u0b95\u0bae\u0bbe\u0ba9 \u0b9a\u0bc2\u0bb4\u0bcd\u0ba8\u0bbf\u0bb2\u0bc8\u0baf\u0bc8 \u0b9a\u0bae\u0bc1\u0ba4\u0bbe\u0baf\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0bb2\u0bcd \u0b89\u0bb0\u0bc1\u0bb5\u0bbe\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bc1\u0bb5\u0ba4\u0ba9\u0bcd \u0bae\u0bc2\u0bb2\u0bae\u0bcd; (ii) \u0b8a\u0ba9\u0bae\u0bc1\u0bb1\u0bcd\u0bb1\u0bcb\u0bb0\u0bbf\u0ba9\u0bcd \u0b95\u0bc1\u0b9f\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd\u0baa \u0b89\u0bb1\u0bc1\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bbf\u0ba9\u0bb0\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bc1\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bc1 \u0b86\u0bb2\u0bcb\u0b9a\u0ba9\u0bc8 \u0bae\u0bb1\u0bcd\u0bb1\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd \u0baa\u0baf\u0bbf\u0bb1\u0bcd\u0b9a\u0bbf \u0b85\u0bb3\u0bbf\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0ba4\u0ba9\u0bcd \u0bae\u0bc2\u0bb2\u0bae\u0bcd; (iii) \u0ba4\u0ba9\u0bbf\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0b9f\u0bcd\u0b9f \u0bae\u0bb1\u0bcd\u0bb1\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd \u0ba4\u0bca\u0b95\u0bc1\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bc1 \u0b87\u0bb2\u0bcd\u0bb2\u0b99\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bbf\u0bb2\u0bcd \u0bae\u0bc1\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0baf\u0bcb\u0bb0\u0bcd \u0baa\u0baf\u0bbf\u0bb1\u0bcd\u0b9a\u0bbf\u0baa\u0bcd \u0baa\u0bbf\u0bb0\u0bbf\u0bb5\u0bc1\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bc8 \u0ba8\u0bbf\u0bb1\u0bc1\u0bb5\u0bc1\u0ba4\u0bb2\u0bcd \u0bae\u0bc2\u0bb2\u0bae\u0bcd \u0b8a\u0ba9\u0bae\u0bc1\u0bb1\u0bcd\u0bb1\u0bcb\u0bb0\u0bc8\u0b9a\u0bcd \u0b9a\u0bae\u0bc1\u0ba4\u0bbe\u0baf\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0bb2\u0bcd \u0ba4\u0ba9\u0bcd\u0ba9\u0bbf\u0b9a\u0bcd\u0b9a\u0bc8\u0baf\u0bbe\u0b95 \u0bb5\u0bbe\u0bb4\u0bcd\u0bb5\u0ba4\u0bb1\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bc1 \u0b8a\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bc1\u0bb5\u0bbf\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd \u0b9a\u0bc6\u0baf\u0bb2\u0bcd\u0bae\u0bc1\u0bb1\u0bc8\u0ba4\u0bcd \u0ba4\u0bbf\u0b9f\u0bcd\u0b9f\u0bae\u0bcd \u0b8e\u0ba4\u0bc1\u0bb5\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd \u0b8e\u0ba9\u0bcd\u0bb1\u0bc1 \u0baa\u0bca\u0bb0\u0bc1\u0bb3\u0bcd\u0baa\u0b9f\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd;", + "1986_10_41_1/TA": "41. (1) \u0b87\u0ba8\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0b9a\u0bcd \u0b9a\u0b9f\u0bcd\u0b9f\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0ba9\u0bcd \u0bb5\u0b95\u0bc8\u0baf\u0b99\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bc1\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bc1\u0b9a\u0bcd \u0b9a\u0bc6\u0bb2\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0bb1\u0bae\u0bcd \u0b95\u0bca\u0b9f\u0bc1\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0bb2\u0bcd \u0b87\u0b9f\u0bb0\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bbe\u0b9f\u0bc1 \u0b8e\u0ba4\u0bc1\u0bb5\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd \u0b8e\u0bb4\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bbe\u0baf\u0bbf\u0ba9\u0bcd, \u0bae\u0bc8\u0baf \u0b85\u0bb0\u0b9a\u0bbe\u0b99\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bae\u0bcd, \u0b85\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0b95\u0bbe\u0bb0\u0bae\u0bc1\u0bb1\u0bc8 \u0b85\u0bb0\u0b9a\u0bbf\u0ba4\u0bb4\u0bbf\u0bb2\u0bcd \u0bb5\u0bc6\u0bb3\u0bbf\u0baf\u0bbf\u0b9f\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0b9f\u0bcd\u0b9f \u0b86\u0ba3\u0bc8\u0bb5\u0bbe\u0baf\u0bbf\u0bb2\u0bbe\u0b95, \u0b85\u0ba8\u0bcd\u0ba4 \u0b87\u0b9f\u0bb0\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bbe\u0b9f\u0bcd\u0b9f\u0bc8 \u0b85\u0b95\u0bb1\u0bcd\u0bb1\u0bc1\u0bb5\u0ba4\u0bb1\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bc1\u0ba4\u0bcd \u0ba4\u0bc7\u0bb5\u0bc8\u0baf\u0bbe\u0ba9\u0ba4\u0bbe\u0b95\u0ba4\u0bcd \u0ba4\u0bcb\u0ba9\u0bcd\u0bb1\u0bb2\u0bbe\u0b95\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd \u0b87\u0ba8\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0b9a\u0bcd \u0b9a\u0b9f\u0bcd\u0b9f\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0ba9\u0bcd \u0bb5\u0b95\u0bc8\u0baf\u0b99\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bc1\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bc1 \u0b92\u0bb5\u0bcd\u0bb5\u0bbe\u0ba4\u0ba4\u0bbe\u0b95 \u0b87\u0bb0\u0bbe\u0ba4 \u0bb5\u0b95\u0bc8\u0baf\u0b99\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bc8\u0b9a\u0bcd \u0b9a\u0bc6\u0baf\u0bcd\u0baf\u0bb2\u0bbe\u0bae\u0bcd:", + "1999_44_4_7/TA": "(6) \u0b95\u0bc1\u0bb4\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bae\u0bbe\u0ba9\u0ba4\u0bc1, \u0b92\u0bb4\u0bc1\u0b99\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bc1\u0bb1\u0bc8 \u0bb5\u0bbf\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bbf\u0ba9\u0bcd \u0bb5\u0bbe\u0baf\u0bbf\u0bb2\u0bbe\u0b95\u0ba4\u0bcd \u0ba4\u0bc0\u0bb0\u0bcd\u0bae\u0bbe\u0ba9\u0bbf\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb2\u0bbe\u0b95\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd \u0ba8\u0bc7\u0bb0\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0bb2\u0bcd \u0bae\u0bb1\u0bcd\u0bb1\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd \u0b87\u0b9f\u0b99\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bbf\u0bb2\u0bcd, \u0b95\u0bc1\u0bb1\u0bc8\u0ba8\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0ba4\u0bc1 \u0bae\u0bc2\u0ba9\u0bcd\u0bb1\u0bc1 \u0bae\u0bbe\u0ba4\u0b99\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bc1\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bc1 \u0b92\u0bb0\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bc1\u0bb1\u0bc8 \u0b95\u0bc2\u0b9f\u0bc1\u0ba4\u0bb2\u0bcd \u0bb5\u0bc7\u0ba3\u0bcd\u0b9f\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd. \u0b85\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bc2\u0b9f\u0bcd\u0b9f\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0ba9\u0bcd \u0b85\u0bb2\u0bc1\u0bb5\u0bb2\u0bcd \u0ba8\u0b9f\u0bb5\u0b9f\u0bbf\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bc8\u0baf\u0bbf\u0bb2\u0bcd \u0bb5\u0b95\u0bc1\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bc1\u0bb0\u0bc8\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0b9f\u0bb2\u0bbe\u0b95\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd \u0ba8\u0b9f\u0bc8\u0bae\u0bc1\u0bb1\u0bc8 \u0bb5\u0bbf\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bc8\u0b95\u0bcd \u0b95\u0b9f\u0bc8\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bbf\u0b9f\u0bbf\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bb2\u0bcd \u0bb5\u0bc7\u0ba3\u0bcd\u0b9f\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd.", + "1986_10_30_1/TA": "30. \u0b8e\u0ba4\u0ba9\u0bcd \u0bae\u0bc0\u0bb1\u0bc1\u0b95\u0bc8\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bbe\u0b95 \u0baa\u0bbf\u0bb0\u0bbf\u0bb5\u0bc1\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bcd 26,27,28,29 \u0b86\u0b95\u0bbf\u0baf\u0bb5\u0bb1\u0bcd\u0bb1\u0bbf\u0bb2\u0bcd \u0ba4\u0ba3\u0bcd\u0b9f\u0ba9\u0bc8 \u0bb5\u0b95\u0bc8\u0b9a\u0bc6\u0baf\u0bcd\u0baf\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0b9f\u0bcd\u0b9f\u0bc1\u0bb3\u0bcd\u0bb3\u0ba4\u0bcb \u0b85\u0ba8\u0bcd\u0ba4 \u0bb5\u0b95\u0bc8\u0baf\u0b99\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bcd \u0b85\u0bb2\u0bcd\u0bb2\u0bbe\u0ba4, \u0b87\u0ba8\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0b9a\u0bcd \u0b9a\u0b9f\u0bcd\u0b9f\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0ba9\u0bcd \u0b85\u0bb2\u0bcd\u0bb2\u0ba4\u0bc1 \u0b85\u0ba4\u0ba9\u0bcd\u0baa\u0b9f\u0bbf \u0bb5\u0b95\u0bc1\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0b9f\u0bcd\u0b9f \u0b8e\u0bb5\u0bc8\u0baf\u0bc7\u0ba9\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd \u0bb5\u0bbf\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bcd \u0b85\u0bb2\u0bcd\u0bb2\u0ba4\u0bc1 \u0b92\u0bb4\u0bc1\u0b99\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bc1\u0bb1\u0bc8\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0b9f\u0bc1\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd \u0bb5\u0bbf\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bbf\u0ba9\u0bcd \u0baa\u0bbf\u0bb1 \u0bb5\u0b95\u0bc8\u0baf\u0b99\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bc8 \u0bae\u0bc0\u0bb1\u0bc1\u0b95\u0bbf\u0bb1 \u0b85\u0bb2\u0bcd\u0bb2\u0ba4\u0bc1 \u0bae\u0bc0\u0bb1 \u0bae\u0bc1\u0baf\u0bb2\u0bc1\u0b95\u0bbf\u0bb1 \u0b85\u0bb2\u0bcd\u0bb2\u0ba4\u0bc1 \u0b85\u0ba4\u0ba9\u0bc8 \u0bae\u0bc0\u0bb1\u0bc1\u0bb5\u0ba4\u0bb1\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bc1 \u0b89\u0b9f\u0ba8\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bc8\u0baf\u0bbe\u0baf\u0bbf\u0bb0\u0bc1\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bbf\u0bb1 \u0b8e\u0bb5\u0bb0\u0bbe\u0baf\u0bbf\u0ba9\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd, \u0b86\u0bb1\u0bc1 \u0bae\u0bbe\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bcd \u0bb5\u0bb0\u0bc8 \u0ba8\u0bc0\u0b9f\u0bbf\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb2\u0bbe\u0b95\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd \u0b9a\u0bbf\u0bb1\u0bc8 \u0ba4\u0ba3\u0bcd\u0b9f\u0ba9\u0bc8 \u0b85\u0bb2\u0bcd\u0bb2\u0ba4\u0bc1 \u0b93\u0bb0\u0bbe\u0baf\u0bbf\u0bb0\u0bae\u0bcd \u0bb0\u0bc2\u0baa\u0bbe\u0baf\u0bcd\u0bb5\u0bb0\u0bc8 \u0ba8\u0bc0\u0b9f\u0bbf\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb2\u0bbe\u0b95\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd \u0b85\u0baa\u0bb0\u0bbe\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bcd \u0b85\u0bb2\u0bcd\u0bb2\u0ba4\u0bc1 \u0bae\u0bc0\u0bb1\u0bc1\u0b95\u0bc8 \u0b8e\u0ba8\u0bcd\u0ba4 \u0ba8\u0bbe\u0bb3\u0bbf\u0ba9\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bcb\u0ba4\u0bc1 \u0ba4\u0bca\u0b9f\u0bb0\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bbf\u0bb1\u0ba4\u0bcb \u0b85\u0ba8\u0bcd\u0ba4 \u0b92\u0bb5\u0bcd\u0bb5\u0bca\u0bb0\u0bc1 \u0ba8\u0bbe\u0bb3\u0bc1\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd \u0b90\u0bae\u0bcd\u0baa\u0ba4\u0bc1 \u0bb0\u0bc2\u0baa\u0bbe\u0baf\u0bcd\u0bb5\u0bb0\u0bc8 \u0ba8\u0bc0\u0b9f\u0bbf\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb2\u0bbe\u0b95\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd \u0b95\u0bc2\u0b9f\u0bc1\u0ba4\u0bb2\u0bcd \u0b85\u0baa\u0bb0\u0bbe\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bcd \u0bb5\u0bbf\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bc1\u0ba4\u0bcd \u0ba4\u0ba3\u0bcd\u0b9f\u0bbf\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0b9f\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb5\u0bb0\u0bcd \u0b86\u0bb5\u0bbe\u0bb0\u0bcd.", + "2005_22_18_16/GU": "(\u0aea) \u0ab8\u0a82\u0ab8\u0aa6 \u0a85\u0aa5\u0ab5\u0abe \u0aaf\u0aa5\u0abe\u0aaa\u0acd\u0ab0\u0ab8\u0a82\u0a97, \u0ab0\u0abe\u0a9c\u0aaf \u0ab5\u0abf\u0aa7\u0abe\u0aa8\u0aae\u0a82\u0aa1\u0ab3\u0aa8\u0abe \u0a95\u0acb\u0a87 \u0aac\u0ac0\u0a9c\u0abe \u0a85\u0aa7\u0abf\u0aa8\u0abf\u0aaf\u0aae\u0aae\u0abe\u0a82 \u0a97\u0aae\u0ac7 \u0aa4\u0ac7 \u0a85\u0ab8\u0a82\u0a97\u0aa4 \u0ab9\u0acb\u0aaf \u0aa4\u0ac7 \u0a9b\u0aa4\u0abe\u0a82, \u0a95\u0ac7\u0aa8\u0acd\u0aa6\u0acd\u0ab0\u0ac0\u0aaf \u0aae\u0abe\u0ab9\u0abf\u0aa4\u0ac0 \u0aaa\u0a82\u0a9a \u0a85\u0aa5\u0ab5\u0abe \u0aaf\u0aa5\u0abe\u0aaa\u0acd\u0ab0\u0ab8\u0a82\u0a97, \u0ab0\u0abe\u0a9c\u0aaf \u0aae\u0abe\u0ab9\u0abf\u0aa4\u0ac0 \u0aaa\u0a82\u0a9a, \u0a86 \u0a85\u0aa7\u0abf\u0aa8\u0abf\u0aaf\u0aae \u0ab9\u0ac7\u0aa0\u0ab3 \u0a95\u0acb\u0a87\u0aaa\u0aa3 \u0aab\u0ab0\u0abf\u0aaf\u0abe\u0aa6 \u0a85\u0a82\u0a97\u0ac7\u0aa8\u0ac0 \u0aa4\u0aaa\u0abe\u0ab8 \u0aa6\u0ab0\u0aae\u0acd\u0aaf\u0abe\u0aa8, \u0a86 \u0a85\u0aa7\u0abf\u0aa8\u0abf\u0aaf\u0aae \u0ab2\u0abe\u0a97\u0ac1 \u0aaa\u0aa1\u0aa4\u0acb \u0ab9\u0acb\u0aaf \u0aa4\u0ac7\u0ab5\u0abe \u0a95\u0acb\u0a87 \u0ab0\u0ac7\u0a95\u0ab0\u0acd\u0aa1\u0aa8\u0ac0 \u0a95\u0ac7 \u0a9c\u0ac7 \u0a9c\u0abe\u0ab9\u0ac7\u0ae8 \u0ab8\u0aa4\u0acd\u0aa4\u0abe\u0aae\u0a82\u0aa1\u0ab3\u0aa8\u0abe \u0aa8\u0abf\u0aaf\u0a82\u0aa4\u0acd\u0ab0\u0aa3 \u0ab9\u0ac7\u0aa0\u0ab3 \u0ab9\u0acb\u0aaf \u0aa4\u0ac7\u0aa8\u0ac0 \u0aa4\u0aaa\u0abe\u0ab8 \u0a95\u0ab0\u0ac0 \u0ab6\u0a95\u0ab6\u0ac7 \u0a85\u0aa8\u0ac7 \u0a86\u0ab5\u0abe \u0a95\u0acb\u0a87\u0aaa\u0aa3 \u0ab0\u0ac7\u0a95\u0ab0\u0acd\u0aa1\u0aa8\u0ac7 \u0a95\u0acb\u0a87\u0aaa\u0aa3 \u0a86\u0aa7\u0abe\u0ab0\u0ac7 \u0a85\u0a9f\u0a95\u0abe\u0ab5\u0ac0 \u0ab6\u0a95\u0abe\u0ab6\u0ac7 \u0aa8\u0ab9\u0abf.", + "2005_22_5_1/GU": "\u0aeb. (\u0ae7) \u0aa6\u0ab0\u0ac7\u0a95 \u0a9c\u0abe\u0ab9\u0ac7\u0ab0 \u0ab8\u0aa4\u0acd\u0aa4\u0abe\u0aae\u0a82\u0aa1\u0ab3\u0ac7, \u0a86 \u0a85\u0aa7\u0abf\u0aa8\u0abf\u0aaf\u0aae\u0aa8\u0abe \u0a85\u0aa7\u0abf\u0aa8\u0abf\u0aaf\u0aae\u0aa8\u0aa5\u0ac0 \u0a8f\u0a95\u0ab8\u0acb \u0aa6\u0abf\u0ab5\u0ab8\u0aa8\u0ac0 \u0a85\u0a82\u0aa6\u0ab0, \u0a86 \u0a85\u0aa7\u0abf\u0aa8\u0abf\u0aaf\u0aae \u0ab9\u0ac7\u0aa0\u0ab3 \u0aae\u0abe\u0ab9\u0abf\u0aa4\u0ac0 \u0aae\u0abe\u0a9f\u0ac7 \u0ab5\u0abf\u0aa8\u0a82\u0aa4\u0ac0 \u0a95\u0ab0\u0aa4\u0ac0 \u0ab5\u0acd\u0aaf\u0a95\u0abf\u0aa4\u0a93\u0aa8\u0ac7 \u0aae\u0abe\u0ab9\u0abf\u0aa4\u0ac0 \u0aaa\u0ac2\u0ab0\u0ac0 \u0aaa\u0abe\u0aa1\u0ab5\u0abe \u0aae\u0abe\u0a9f\u0ac7 \u0aa4\u0ac7\u0aa8\u0ac0 \u0ab9\u0ac7\u0aa0\u0ab3\u0aa8\u0abe \u0aa4\u0aae\u0abe\u0aae \u0ab5\u0ab9\u0ac0\u0ab5\u0a9f\u0ac0 \u0a8f\u0a95\u0aae\u0acb \u0a85\u0aa5\u0ab5\u0abe \u0a95\u0a9a\u0ac7\u0ab0\u0ac0\u0a93\u0aae\u0abe\u0a82 \u0a95\u0ac7\u0aa8\u0acd\u0aa6\u0acd\u0ab0\u0ac0\u0aaf \u0a9c\u0abe\u0ab9\u0ac7\u0ab0 \u0aae\u0abe\u0ab9\u0abf\u0aa4\u0ac0 \u0a85\u0aa7\u0abf\u0a95\u0abe\u0ab0\u0ac0\u0a93 \u0a85\u0aa5\u0ab5\u0abe \u0aaf\u0aa5\u0abe\u0aaa\u0acd\u0ab0\u0ab8\u0a82\u0a97, \u0ab0\u0abe\u0a9c\u0aaf\u0aa8\u0abe \u0a9c\u0abe\u0ab9\u0ac7\u0ab0 \u0aae\u0abe\u0ab9\u0abf\u0aa4\u0ac0 \u0a85\u0aa7\u0abf\u0a95\u0abe\u0ab0\u0ac0\u0a93 \u0aa4\u0ab0\u0ac0\u0a95\u0ac7 \u0a9c\u0ab0\u0ac2\u0ab0\u0ac0 \u0ab9\u0acb\u0aaf \u0aa4\u0ac7\u0a9f\u0ab2\u0abe \u0a85\u0aa7\u0abf\u0a95\u0abe\u0ab0\u0ac0\u0a93\u0aa8\u0ac7 \u0aae\u0ac1\u0a95\u0ab0\u0ab0 \u0a95\u0ab0\u0ab5\u0abe \u0a9c\u0acb\u0a87\u0ab6\u0ac7.", + "2005_22_19_8/GU": "(\u0aec) \u0aaa\u0ac7\u0a9f\u0abe-\u0a95\u0ab2\u0aae (\u0ae7) \u0a85\u0aa5\u0ab5\u0abe \u0aaa\u0ac7\u0a9f\u0abe-\u0a95\u0ab2\u0aae (\u0ae8) \u0ab9\u0ac7\u0aa0\u0ab3\u0aa8\u0ac0 \u0a85\u0aaa\u0ac0\u0ab2\u0aa8\u0acb \u0aa8\u0abf\u0a95\u0abe\u0ab2, \u0a85\u0aaa\u0ac0\u0ab2 \u0aae\u0ab3\u0acd\u0aaf\u0abe\u0aa8\u0abe \u0aa4\u0acd\u0ab0\u0ac0\u0ab8 \u0aa6\u0abf\u0ab5\u0ab8\u0aa8\u0ac0 \u0a85\u0a82\u0aa6\u0ab0 \u0a85\u0aa5\u0ab5\u0abe \u0aaf\u0aa5\u0abe\u0aaa\u0acd\u0ab0\u0ab8\u0a82\u0a97, \u0aa4\u0ac7\u0aa8\u0ac0 \u0a85\u0aaa\u0ac0\u0ab2 \u0aa6\u0abe\u0a96\u0ab2 \u0a95\u0ab0\u0acd\u0aaf\u0abe\u0aa8\u0ac0 \u0aa4\u0abe\u0ab0\u0ac0\u0a96\u0aa5\u0ac0 \u0a95\u0ac1\u0ab2 \u0aaa\u0abf\u0ab8\u0acd\u0aa4\u0abe\u0ab3\u0ac0\u0ab8 \u0aa6\u0abf\u0ab5\u0ab8\u0aa5\u0ac0 \u0ab5\u0aa7\u0ac1 \u0aa8\u0ab9\u0abf \u0aa4\u0ac7\u0a9f\u0ab2\u0abe \u0ab2\u0a82\u0aac\u0abe\u0ab5\u0ac7\u0ab2\u0abe \u0ab8\u0aae\u0aaf\u0a97\u0abe\u0ab3\u0abe\u0aa8\u0ac0 \u0a85\u0a82\u0aa6\u0ae8, \u0ab2\u0ac7\u0a96\u0abf\u0aa4\u0aae\u0abe\u0a82 \u0a95\u0abe\u0ab0\u0aa3\u0acb\u0aa8\u0ac0 \u0aa8\u0acb\u0a82\u0aa7 \u0a95\u0ab0\u0ac0\u0aa8\u0ac7, \u0a95\u0ab0\u0ab5\u0acb \u0a9c\u0acb\u0a87\u0ab6\u0ac7.", + "2005_22_2_6/GU": "(\u0a97) \"\u0a95\u0ac7\u0aa8\u0acd\u0aa6\u0acd\u0ab0\u0ac0\u0aaf \u0a9c\u0abe\u0ab9\u0ac7\u0ab0 \u0aae\u0abe\u0ab9\u0abf\u0aa4\u0ac0 \u0a85\u0aa7\u0abf\u0a95\u0abe\u0ab0\u0ac0\u201d \u0a8f\u0a9f\u0ab2\u0ac7 \u0a95\u0ab2\u0aae \u0aaa\u0aa8\u0ac0 \u0aaa\u0ac7\u0a9f\u0abe-\u0a95\u0ab2\u0aae(\u0ae7) \u0ab9\u0ac7\u0aa0\u0ab3 \u0aae\u0ac1\u0a95\u0ab0\u0ab0 \u0a95\u0ab0\u0ac7\u0ab2 \u0a95\u0ac7\u0aa8\u0acd\u0aa6\u0acd\u0ab0\u0ac0\u0aaf \u0a9c\u0abe\u0ab9\u0ac7\u0ab0 \u0aae\u0abe\u0ab9\u0abf\u0aa4\u0ac0 \u0a85\u0aa7\u0abf\u0a95\u0abe\u0ab0\u0ac0 \u0a85\u0aa8\u0ac7 \u0aa4\u0ac7\u0aae\u0abe\u0a82 \u0aaa\u0ac7\u0a9f\u0abe-\u0a95\u0ab2\u0aae (\u0ae8) \u0ab9\u0ac7\u0aa0\u0ab3 \u0aa4\u0ac7 \u0aa4\u0ab0\u0ac0\u0a95\u0ac7 \u0aae\u0ac1\u0a95\u0ae8\u0ae8 \u0a95\u0ab0\u0ac7\u0ab2 \u0a95\u0ac7\u0aa8\u0acd\u0aa6\u0acd\u0ab0\u0ac0\u0aaf \u0aae\u0aa6\u0aa6\u0aa8\u0ac0\u0ab6 \u0a9c\u0abe\u0ab9\u0ac7\u0ab0 \u0aae\u0abe\u0ab9\u0abf\u0aa4\u0ac0 \u0a85\u0aa7\u0abf\u0a95\u0abe\u0ab0\u0ac0\u0aa8\u0acb \u0ab8\u0aae\u0abe\u0ab5\u0ac7\u0ab6 \u0aa5\u0abe\u0aaf \u0a9b\u0ac7,", + "2005_22_8_17/GU": "\u0aaa\u0ab0\u0a82\u0aa4\u0ac1 \u0ab8\u0aa6\u0ab0\u0ab9\u0ac1 \u0ab5\u0ac0\u0ab8 \u0ab5\u0ab0\u0acd\u0ab7\u0aa8\u0ac0 \u0aae\u0ac1\u0aa6\u0aa4 \u0a95\u0a87 \u0aa4\u0abe\u0ab0\u0ac0\u0a96\u0aa5\u0ac0 \u0a97\u0aa3\u0ab5\u0ac0 \u0aa4\u0ac7 \u0ab5\u0abf\u0ab7\u0ac7 \u0a95\u0acb\u0a87 \u0aaa\u0acd\u0ab0\u0ab6\u0acd\u0aa8 \u0a89\u0aad\u0acb \u0aa5\u0abe\u0aaf \u0aa4\u0acd\u0aaf\u0abe\u0ab0\u0ac7, \u0a86 \u0a85\u0aa7\u0abf\u0aa8\u0abf\u0aaf\u0aae\u0aae\u0abe\u0a82 \u0a9c\u0acb\u0a97\u0ab5\u0abe\u0a87 \u0a95\u0ab0\u0ab5\u0abe\u0aae\u0abe\u0a82 \u0a86\u0ab5\u0ac7\u0ab2 \u0ab8\u0abe\u0aae\u0abe\u0aa8\u0acd\u0aaf \u0a85\u0aaa\u0ac0\u0ab2\u0acb\u0aa8\u0ac7 \u0a85\u0aa7\u0ac0\u0aa8 \u0ab0\u0ab9\u0ac0\u0aa8\u0ac7, \u0a95\u0ac7\u0aa8\u0acd\u0aa6\u0acd\u0ab0 \u0ab8\u0ab0\u0a95\u0abe\u0ab0\u0aa8\u0acb \u0aa8\u0abf\u0ab0\u0acd\u0aa3\u0aaf \u0a86\u0a96\u0ab0\u0ac0 \u0a97\u0aa3\u0abe\u0ab6\u0ac7." + }, + "cci_faq": { + "Q_4_46/BN": "\u09b8\u0982\u09ae\u09bf\u09b6\u09cd\u09b0\u09a3 \u09b0\u09c7\u0997\u09c1\u09b2\u09c7\u09b6\u09a8\u09c7\u09b0 \u09a4\u09be\u09b2\u09bf\u0995\u09be \u0964-\u098f\u09b0 \u0986\u0987\u099f\u09c7\u09ae 6-\u098f\u09b0 \u09b8\u09c1\u09ac\u09bf\u09a7\u09be \u09aa\u09be\u0993\u09af\u09bc\u09be\u09b0 \u099c\u09a8\u09cd\u09af \u098f\u0995\u099f\u09bf \u09b6\u09b0\u09cd\u09a4 \u09b9\u09b2 \u09af\u09c7 \u09b6\u09c7\u09af\u09bc\u09be\u09b0 \u09ac\u09be \u09ad\u09cb\u099f\u09c7\u09b0 \u0985\u09a7\u09bf\u0995\u09be\u09b0 \u0985\u09a7\u09bf\u0997\u09cd\u09b0\u09b9\u09a3 \u09ac\u09cb\u09a8\u09be\u09b8 \u0987\u09b8\u09cd\u09af\u09c1 \u09ac\u09be \u09b8\u09cd\u099f\u0995 \u09b8\u09cd\u09aa\u09cd\u09b2\u09bf\u099f \u09ac\u09be \u09b6\u09c7\u09af\u09bc\u09be\u09b0\u09c7\u09b0 \u0985\u09ad\u09bf\u09b9\u09bf\u09a4 \u09ae\u09c2\u09b2\u09cd\u09af \u098f\u0995\u09a4\u09cd\u09b0\u09c0\u0995\u09b0\u09a3 \u09ac\u09be \u09b6\u09c7\u09af\u09bc\u09be\u09b0 \u09ac\u09be\u0987\u09ac\u09cd\u09af\u09be\u0995 \u09ac\u09be \u09b0\u09be\u0987\u099f \u0987\u09b8\u09cd\u09af\u09c1\u09a4\u09c7 \u09b8\u09be\u09ac\u09b8\u09cd\u0995\u09cd\u09b0\u09bf\u09aa\u09b6\u09a8\u09c7\u09b0 \u09ad\u09bf\u09a4\u09cd\u09a4\u09bf\u09a4\u09c7 \u09b9\u0993\u09af\u09bc\u09be \u0989\u099a\u09bf\u09a4\u0964 \u09b6\u09c7\u09af\u09bc\u09be\u09b0\u09c7\u09b0 (\u0995\u09b0\u09cd\u09aa\u09cb\u09b0\u09c7\u099f \u0995\u09b0\u09cd\u09ae \u09ac\u09b2\u09c1\u09a8) \u098f\u09ac\u0982 \u098f\u099f\u09bf \u09a8\u09bf\u09af\u09bc\u09a8\u09cd\u09a4\u09cd\u09b0\u09a3 \u0985\u09a7\u09bf\u0997\u09cd\u09b0\u09b9\u09a3\u09c7\u09b0 \u09a6\u09bf\u0995\u09c7 \u09aa\u09b0\u09bf\u099a\u09be\u09b2\u09bf\u09a4 \u0995\u09b0\u09be \u0989\u099a\u09bf\u09a4 \u09a8\u09af\u09bc\u0964 \u098f\u0987 \u0986\u0987\u099f\u09c7\u09ae\u099f\u09bf\u09b0 \u09b8\u09c1\u09ac\u09bf\u09a7\u09be \u0995\u09bf \u09a8\u09bf\u09ae\u09cd\u09a8\u09b2\u09bf\u0996\u09bf\u09a4 \u09aa\u09b0\u09bf\u09b8\u09cd\u09a5\u09bf\u09a4\u09bf\u09a4\u09c7 \u09aa\u09be\u0993\u09af\u09bc\u09be \u09af\u09be\u09ac\u09c7?", + "Q_4_33/BN": "\u09ac\u09bf\u099c\u09cd\u099e\u09aa\u09cd\u09a4\u09bf \u09a8\u0982 29\u09b6\u09c7 \u099c\u09c1\u09a8 2017-\u098f \u09aa\u09cd\u09b0\u0995\u09be\u09b6\u09bf\u09a4 SO 2039(E) \u0986\u0987\u09a8\u09c7\u09b0 \u09a7\u09be\u09b0\u09be 6(2) \u098f \u0989\u09b2\u09cd\u09b2\u09bf\u0996\u09bf\u09a4 30 \u09a6\u09bf\u09a8\u09c7\u09b0 \u09ae\u09a7\u09cd\u09af\u09c7 \u09a8\u09cb\u099f\u09bf\u09b6 \u09a6\u09c7\u0993\u09af\u09bc\u09be\u09b0 \u09a5\u09c7\u0995\u09c7 \u09aa\u09cd\u09b0\u09a4\u09cd\u09af\u09c7\u0995 \u09ac\u09cd\u09af\u0995\u09cd\u09a4\u09bf \u09ac\u09be \u098f\u09a8\u09cd\u099f\u09be\u09b0\u09aa\u09cd\u09b0\u09be\u0987\u099c \u09af\u09be\u09b0\u09be \u098f\u0995\u099f\u09bf \u09b8\u0982\u09ae\u09bf\u09b6\u09cd\u09b0\u09a3\u09c7 \u0985\u0982\u09b6 \u09a8\u09c7\u09af\u09bc \u09a4\u09be\u09a6\u09c7\u09b0 \u099b\u09be\u09a1\u09bc \u09aa\u09cd\u09b0\u09a6\u09be\u09a8 \u0995\u09b0\u09c7\u09f7 \u098f\u09b0 \u0985\u09b0\u09cd\u09a5 \u0995\u09bf \u098f\u0987 \u09af\u09c7, \u0985\u09ac\u09cd\u09af\u09be\u09b9\u09a4\u09bf \u09b8\u09ae\u09af\u09bc\u0995\u09be\u09b2\u09c7, \u0986\u0987\u09a8\u09c7\u09b0 \u09a7\u09be\u09b0\u09be 6 (2) \u098f\u09b0 \u0985\u09a7\u09c0\u09a8\u09c7 \u0995\u09ae\u09bf\u09b6\u09a8\u0995\u09c7 \u09a8\u09cb\u099f\u09bf\u09b6 \u09a6\u09c7\u0993\u09af\u09bc\u09be\u09b0 \u0995\u09cb\u09a8\u09cb \u09ac\u09be\u09a7\u09cd\u09af\u09ac\u09be\u09a7\u0995\u09a4\u09be \u09a8\u09c7\u0987?", + "Q_2_7/BN": "\u0995\u09ae\u09b6\u09be\u09b8\u09cd\u09a4\u09bf\u09b0 \u09b8\u09c1\u09ac\u09bf\u09a7\u09be \u09aa\u09c7\u09a4\u09c7 \u09b9\u09b2\u09c7 \u0995\u09bf \u0995\u09bf \u09b6\u09b0\u09cd\u09a4 \u09aa\u09c2\u09b0\u09a3 \u0995\u09b0\u09a4\u09c7 \u09b9\u09ac\u09c7?", + "Q_3_16/BN": "\u098f\u0995\u099f\u09bf \u09a6\u09b2\u09c7\u09b0 \u0995\u09a4\u099c\u09a8 \u09aa\u09cd\u09b0\u09a4\u09bf\u09a8\u09bf\u09a7\u09bf\u0995\u09c7 \u09b8\u09a6\u09b8\u09cd\u09af \u09b9\u09bf\u09b8\u09be\u09ac\u09c7 \u0997\u09cb\u09aa\u09a8\u09c0\u09af\u09bc\u09a4\u09be \u09ac\u09b2\u09af\u09bc\u09c7 \u0985\u09a8\u09cd\u09a4\u09b0\u09cd\u09ad\u09c1\u0995\u09cd\u09a4 \u0995\u09b0\u09be \u09af\u09c7\u09a4\u09c7 \u09aa\u09be\u09b0\u09c7?", + "Q_4_63/BN": "\u09b8\u09bf\u09b8\u09bf\u0986\u0987 \u09b8\u0982\u09ae\u09bf\u09b6\u09cd\u09b0\u09a3 \u0987\u09a8\u09ad\u09c7\u09b8\u09cd\u099f\u09bf\u0997\u09c7\u09b6\u09a8 \u09aa\u09a6\u09cd\u09a7\u09a4\u09bf\u09b0 \u09b8\u09ae\u09be\u09aa\u09cd\u09a4\u09bf \u0998\u099f\u09be\u09af\u09bc?", + "Q_4_106/HI": "\u0915\u094d\u092f\u093e \u0917\u094d\u0930\u0940\u0928 \u091a\u0948\u0928\u0932 \u0930\u0942\u091f \u0915\u0947 \u0905\u0902\u0924\u0930\u094d\u0917\u0924 \u092b\u093e\u0907\u0932 \u0915\u0930\u0928\u0947 \u0915\u093e \u0935\u093f\u0915\u0932\u094d\u092a \u0906\u092e\u0924\u094c\u0930 \u092a\u0930 \u0935\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092a\u093e\u0930 \u0939\u093f\u0924\u0927\u093e\u0930\u0915\u094b\u0902 \u0926\u094d\u0935\u093e\u0930\u093e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u093e\u092a\u094d\u0924 \u0915\u093f\u092f\u093e \u091c\u093e\u0924\u093e \u0939\u0948 ?", + "Q_4_93/HI": "\u0917\u0928 \u091c\u0902\u092a\u093f\u0902\u0917 \u0915\u094d\u092f\u093e \u0939\u0948 ?", + "Q_4_99/HI": "\u0917\u094d\u0930\u0940\u0928 \u091a\u0948\u0928\u0932 \u092b\u093e\u0907\u0932\u093f\u0902\u0917 \u0915\u0947 \u0915\u094d\u092f\u093e \u0932\u093e\u092d \u0939\u0948?", + "Q_2_4/HI": "\u0928\u094d\u092f\u0942\u0928\u0924\u0930 \u0905\u0930\u094d\u0925\u0926\u0923\u094d\u0921 \u0915\u0947 \u0932\u093f\u090f \u0915\u094c\u0928 \u0914\u0930 \u0915\u093f\u0938 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0915\u093e\u0930 \u0915\u0947 \u0906\u091a\u0930\u0923 \u0915\u0947 \u0932\u093f\u090f \u0906\u0935\u0947\u0926\u0928 \u0915\u0930 \u0938\u0915\u0924\u093e \u0939\u0948?", + "Q_3_22/HI": "\u0917\u094b\u092a\u0928\u0940\u092f\u0924\u093e \u091a\u0915\u094d\u0930 \u0915\u093e \u0939\u093f\u0938\u094d\u0938\u093e \u092c\u0928\u0928\u0947 \u0935\u093e\u0932\u0947 \u092a\u0915\u094d\u0937\u0915\u093e\u0930\u094b\u0902 \u0926\u094d\u0935\u093e\u0930\u093e \u0926\u093e\u0916\u093f\u0932 \u0915\u093f\u090f \u091c\u093e\u0928\u0947 \u0935\u093e\u0932\u0947 \u0935\u091a\u0928 \u092a\u0924\u094d\u0930 \u0915\u093e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u093e\u0930\u0942\u092a \u0915\u094d\u092f\u093e \u0939\u0948?", + "Q_4_7/MR": "\u0917\u091f-\u0938\u094d\u0924\u0930\u0940\u092f \u0925\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0936\u094b\u0932\u094d\u0921 \u0905\u0902\u0924\u0930\u094d\u0917\u0924, \u0915\u094b\u0923\u0924\u0947 \u0909\u0926\u094d\u092f\u094b\u0917 \u0906\u0939\u0947\u0924 \u091c\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0902\u091a\u0940 \u092e\u093e\u0932\u092e\u0924\u094d\u0924\u093e \u0906\u0923\u093f \u0909\u0932\u093e\u0922\u093e\u0932 \u0915\u093e\u092f\u0926\u094d\u092f\u093e\u091a\u094d\u092f\u093e \u0915\u0932\u092e 5 \u0905\u0902\u0924\u0930\u094d\u0917\u0924 \u0935\u093f\u0939\u093f\u0924 \u0915\u0947\u0932\u0947\u0932\u094d\u092f\u093e \u0925\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0936\u094b\u0932\u094d\u0921\u091a\u094d\u092f\u093e \u091a\u093e\u091a\u0923\u0940\u0938\u093e\u0920\u0940 \u0935\u093f\u091a\u093e\u0930\u093e\u0924 \u0918\u0947\u0924\u0932\u0940 \u091c\u093e\u0924\u0947?", + "Q_2_23/MR": "\u0915\u092e\u0940 \u0926\u0902\u0921\u093e\u0938\u093e\u0920\u0940 \u0905\u0930\u094d\u091c\u093e\u092e\u0927\u094d\u092f\u0947 \u0915\u094b\u0923\u0924\u0940 \u092e\u093e\u0939\u093f\u0924\u0940 \u0938\u093e\u0926\u0930 \u0915\u0930\u0923\u0947 \u0906\u0935\u0936\u094d\u092f\u0915 \u0906\u0939\u0947?", + "Q_4_47/MR": "\u092b\u093e\u0907\u0932\u093f\u0902\u0917 \u0915\u0930\u0923\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092a\u0942\u0930\u094d\u0935\u0940 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0940-\u092b\u093e\u0907\u0932\u093f\u0902\u0917 \u0938\u0932\u094d\u0932\u093e\u092e\u0938\u0932\u0924 \u0915\u0930\u0923\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0938\u093e\u0920\u0940 \u0915\u094b\u0923 CCI \u0915\u0921\u0947 \u0938\u0902\u092a\u0930\u094d\u0915 \u0938\u093e\u0927\u0942 \u0936\u0915\u0924\u094b?", + "Q_4_82/MR": "\u0906\u092f\u092c\u0940\u0938\u0940 \u0935\u094d\u092f\u0935\u0939\u093e\u0930 \u0906\u092f\u094b\u0917\u093e\u0932\u093e \u0938\u0942\u091a\u093f\u0924 \u0915\u0930\u0923\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092f\u094b\u0917\u094d\u092f \u0906\u0939\u0947\u0924 \u0915\u093e? IBC \u0935\u094d\u092f\u0935\u0939\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u0942\u091a\u0928\u093e \u0915\u0930\u0923\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092f\u094b\u0917\u094d\u092f \u0906\u0939\u0947 \u0915\u0940 \u0928\u093e\u0939\u0940 \u0939\u0947 \u0915\u0938\u0947 \u0924\u092a\u093e\u0938\u0924\u093e \u092f\u0947\u0908\u0932?", + "Q_1_1/MR": "\u092e\u093e\u0939\u093f\u0924\u0940 \u0915\u094b\u0923 \u092d\u0930\u0942 \u0936\u0915\u0924\u0947?", + "Q_2_10/TA": "\u0b95\u0bc1\u0bb1\u0bc8\u0bb5\u0bbe\u0ba9 \u0ba4\u0ba3\u0bcd\u0b9f\u0ba9\u0bc8\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bc1 \u0b92\u0bb0\u0bc1\u0bb5\u0bb0\u0bcd \u0b8e\u0bb5\u0bcd\u0bb5\u0bbe\u0bb1\u0bc1 \u0bb5\u0bbf\u0ba3\u0bcd\u0ba3\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bbf\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb2\u0bbe\u0bae\u0bcd?", + "Q_4_4/TA": "\u0b9a\u0b9f\u0bcd\u0b9f\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0ba9\u0bcd \u0baa\u0bbf\u0bb0\u0bbf\u0bb5\u0bc1 5 \u0b87\u0ba9\u0bcd \u0b95\u0bc0\u0bb4\u0bcd \u0baa\u0bb0\u0bbf\u0ba8\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bc1\u0bb0\u0bc8\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0b9f\u0bcd\u0b9f \u0bb5\u0bb0\u0bae\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bc1 \u0bae\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bc1\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bcd \u0b8e\u0ba9\u0bcd\u0ba9?", + "Q_2_26/TA": "\u0b95\u0bc1\u0bb1\u0bc8\u0bb5\u0bbe\u0ba9 \u0b85\u0baa\u0bbe\u0bb0\u0ba4\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0bb1\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bbe\u0ba9 \u0bb5\u0bbf\u0ba3\u0bcd\u0ba3\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bc8 \u0b92\u0bb0\u0bc1\u0bb5\u0bb0\u0bbe\u0bb2\u0bcd \u0ba4\u0bbf\u0bb0\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd\u0baa\u0baa\u0bcd \u0baa\u0bc6\u0bb1 \u0bae\u0bc1\u0b9f\u0bbf\u0baf\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bbe?", + "Q_2_13/TA": "\u0b92\u0ba9\u0bcd\u0bb1\u0bc1\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd \u0bae\u0bc7\u0bb1\u0bcd\u0baa\u0b9f\u0bcd\u0b9f \u0ba8\u0baa\u0bb0\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bcd/\u0ba8\u0bbf\u0bb1\u0bc1\u0bb5\u0ba9\u0b99\u0bcd\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bcd \u0b95\u0bc2\u0b9f\u0bcd\u0b9f\u0bbe\u0b95\u0b9a\u0bcd \u0b95\u0bc1\u0bb1\u0bc8\u0bb5\u0bbe\u0ba9 \u0ba4\u0ba3\u0bcd\u0b9f\u0ba9\u0bc8\u0baf\u0bc8\u0b95\u0bcd \u0b95\u0bc7\u0b9f\u0bcd\u0b95 \u0bae\u0bc1\u0b9f\u0bbf\u0baf\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bbe?", + "Q_1_9/TA": "\u0ba4\u0b95\u0bb5\u0bb2\u0bbe\u0ba9\u0ba4\u0bc1 (\u0bae\u0bb1\u0bcd\u0bb1\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bcd \u0b85\u0b9f\u0bc1\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0b9f\u0bc1\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4 \u0baa\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0bb5\u0bc1\u0b95\u0bb3\u0bcd) \u0bb9\u0bbe\u0bb0\u0bcd\u0b9f\u0bcd \u0b95\u0bbe\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bbf\u0baf\u0bbe\u0b95 (\u0b95\u0b9f\u0bbf\u0ba9 \u0ba8\u0b95\u0bb2\u0bbe\u0b95) \u0b9a\u0bae\u0bb0\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bbf\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0b9f \u0bb5\u0bc7\u0ba3\u0bcd\u0b9f\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bbe \u0b85\u0bb2\u0bcd\u0bb2\u0ba4\u0bc1 \u0b9a\u0bbe\u0b83\u0baa\u0bcd\u0b9f\u0bcd \u0b95\u0bbe\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bbf\u0baf\u0bbe\u0b95 (\u0bae\u0bc6\u0ba9\u0bcd \u0ba8\u0b95\u0bb2\u0bbe\u0b950 \u0b9a\u0bae\u0bb0\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0bbf\u0b95\u0bcd\u0b95\u0baa\u0bcd\u0baa\u0b9f \u0bb5\u0bc7\u0ba3\u0bcd\u0b9f\u0bc1\u0bae\u0bbe?" + } + } +} \ No newline at end of file