Update README.md
#5
by
qubvel-hf
HF staff
- opened
README.md
CHANGED
@@ -22,17 +22,25 @@ widget:
|
|
22 |
---
|
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
-
# Model Card for
|
26 |
|
27 |
-
<!-- Provide a quick summary of what the model is/does. -->
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
## Model Details
|
32 |
|
33 |
-
|
34 |
|
35 |
-
The YOLO series has become the most popular framework for real-time object detection due to its reasonable trade-off between speed and accuracy.
|
36 |
However, we observe that the speed and accuracy of YOLOs are negatively affected by the NMS.
|
37 |
Recently, end-to-end Transformer-based detectors (DETRs) have provided an alternative to eliminating NMS.
|
38 |
Nevertheless, the high computational cost limits their practicality and hinders them from fully exploiting the advantage of excluding NMS.
|
@@ -47,61 +55,32 @@ We also develop scaled RT-DETRs that outperform the lighter YOLO detectors (S an
|
|
47 |
Furthermore, RT-DETR-R50 outperforms DINO-R50 by 2.2% AP in accuracy and about 21 times in FPS.
|
48 |
After pre-training with Objects365, RT-DETR-R50 / R101 achieves 55.3% / 56.2% AP. The project page: this [https URL](https://zhao-yian.github.io/RTDETR/).
|
49 |
|
50 |
-
![image/png](https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/6579e0eaa9e58aec614e9d97/WULSDLsCVs7RNEs9KB0Lr.png)
|
51 |
|
52 |
-
|
|
|
53 |
|
54 |
- **Developed by:** Yian Zhao and Sangbum Choi
|
55 |
-
- **Funded by
|
56 |
and the Shenzhen Medical Research Funds in China (No.
|
57 |
B2302037).
|
58 |
-
- **Shared by
|
59 |
-
- **Model type:**
|
60 |
-
- **Language(s) (NLP):**
|
61 |
- **License:** Apache-2.0
|
62 |
-
- **Finetuned from model [optional]:**
|
63 |
|
64 |
-
### Model Sources
|
65 |
|
66 |
<!-- Provide the basic links for the model. -->
|
67 |
|
|
|
68 |
- **Repository:** https://github.com/lyuwenyu/RT-DETR
|
69 |
-
- **Paper
|
70 |
-
- **Demo
|
71 |
-
|
72 |
-
## Uses
|
73 |
-
|
74 |
-
<!-- Address questions around how the model is intended to be used, including the foreseeable users of the model and those affected by the model. -->
|
75 |
-
|
76 |
-
### Direct Use
|
77 |
-
|
78 |
-
<!-- This section is for the model use without fine-tuning or plugging into a larger ecosystem/app. -->
|
79 |
-
|
80 |
-
You can use the raw model for object detection. See the [model hub](https://huggingface.co/models?search=rtdetr) to look for all available RTDETR models.
|
81 |
-
|
82 |
-
### Downstream Use [optional]
|
83 |
-
|
84 |
-
<!-- This section is for the model use when fine-tuned for a task, or when plugged into a larger ecosystem/app -->
|
85 |
-
|
86 |
-
### Out-of-Scope Use
|
87 |
-
|
88 |
-
<!-- This section addresses misuse, malicious use, and uses that the model will not work well for. -->
|
89 |
-
|
90 |
-
## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
|
91 |
-
|
92 |
-
<!-- This section is meant to convey both technical and sociotechnical limitations. -->
|
93 |
-
|
94 |
-
### Recommendations
|
95 |
-
|
96 |
-
<!-- This section is meant to convey recommendations with respect to the bias, risk, and technical limitations. -->
|
97 |
-
|
98 |
-
Users (both direct and downstream) should be made aware of the risks, biases and limitations of the model. More information needed for further recommendations.
|
99 |
|
100 |
## How to Get Started with the Model
|
101 |
|
102 |
Use the code below to get started with the model.
|
103 |
|
104 |
-
```
|
105 |
import torch
|
106 |
import requests
|
107 |
|
@@ -148,77 +127,48 @@ The RTDETR model was trained on [COCO 2017 object detection](https://cocodataset
|
|
148 |
|
149 |
<!-- This relates heavily to the Technical Specifications. Content here should link to that section when it is relevant to the training procedure. -->
|
150 |
|
151 |
-
We conduct experiments on
|
152 |
-
|
153 |
-
|
154 |
-
dataset. We report the standard COCO metrics, including
|
155 |
-
AP (averaged over uniformly sampled IoU thresholds ranging from 0.50-0.95 with a step size of 0.05), AP50, AP75, as
|
156 |
-
well as AP at different scales: APS, APM, APL.
|
157 |
|
158 |
-
|
159 |
|
160 |
-
Images are resized
|
161 |
|
162 |
-
|
163 |
|
164 |
- **Training regime:** <!--fp32, fp16 mixed precision, bf16 mixed precision, bf16 non-mixed precision, fp16 non-mixed precision, fp8 mixed precision -->
|
165 |
|
166 |
![image/png](https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/6579e0eaa9e58aec614e9d97/E15I9MwZCtwNIms-W8Ra9.png)
|
167 |
|
168 |
-
#### Speeds, Sizes, Times [optional]
|
169 |
-
|
170 |
-
<!-- This section provides information about throughput, start/end time, checkpoint size if relevant, etc. -->
|
171 |
|
172 |
## Evaluation
|
173 |
|
174 |
-
<!-- This section describes the evaluation protocols and provides the results. -->
|
175 |
-
|
176 |
-
This model achieves an AP (average precision) of 53.1 on COCO 2017 validation. For more details regarding evaluation results, we refer to table 2 of the original paper.
|
177 |
|
178 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179 |
|
180 |
-
#### Testing Data
|
181 |
|
182 |
-
<!-- This should link to a Dataset Card if possible. -->
|
183 |
-
|
184 |
-
#### Factors
|
185 |
-
|
186 |
-
<!-- These are the things the evaluation is disaggregating by, e.g., subpopulations or domains. -->
|
187 |
-
|
188 |
-
#### Metrics
|
189 |
-
|
190 |
-
<!-- These are the evaluation metrics being used, ideally with a description of why. -->
|
191 |
-
|
192 |
-
### Results
|
193 |
-
|
194 |
-
#### Summary
|
195 |
-
|
196 |
-
|
197 |
-
|
198 |
-
## Model Examination [optional]
|
199 |
-
|
200 |
-
<!-- Relevant interpretability work for the model goes here -->
|
201 |
-
|
202 |
-
## Environmental Impact
|
203 |
-
|
204 |
-
<!-- Total emissions (in grams of CO2eq) and additional considerations, such as electricity usage, go here. Edit the suggested text below accordingly -->
|
205 |
-
|
206 |
-
Carbon emissions can be estimated using the [Machine Learning Impact calculator](https://mlco2.github.io/impact#compute) presented in [Lacoste et al. (2019)](https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.09700).
|
207 |
-
|
208 |
-
|
209 |
-
## Technical Specifications [optional]
|
210 |
|
211 |
### Model Architecture and Objective
|
212 |
|
213 |
![image/png](https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/6579e0eaa9e58aec614e9d97/sdIwTRlHNwPzyBNwHja60.png)
|
214 |
|
215 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
216 |
|
217 |
-
#### Hardware
|
218 |
|
219 |
-
|
220 |
-
|
221 |
-
## Citation [optional]
|
222 |
|
223 |
<!-- If there is a paper or blog post introducing the model, the APA and Bibtex information for that should go in this section. -->
|
224 |
|
@@ -235,16 +185,8 @@ Carbon emissions can be estimated using the [Machine Learning Impact calculator]
|
|
235 |
}
|
236 |
```
|
237 |
|
238 |
-
|
239 |
-
|
240 |
-
## Glossary [optional]
|
241 |
-
|
242 |
-
<!-- If relevant, include terms and calculations in this section that can help readers understand the model or model card. -->
|
243 |
-
|
244 |
-
## More Information [optional]
|
245 |
-
|
246 |
-
## Model Card Authors [optional]
|
247 |
|
248 |
-
[Sangbum Choi](https://huggingface.co/danelcsb)
|
|
|
249 |
|
250 |
-
## Model Card Contact
|
|
|
22 |
---
|
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
+
# Model Card for RT-DETR
|
26 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
28 |
+
## Table of Contents
|
29 |
+
|
30 |
+
1. [Model Details](#model-details)
|
31 |
+
2. [Model Sources](#model-sources)
|
32 |
+
3. [How to Get Started with the Model](#how-to-get-started-with-the-model)
|
33 |
+
4. [Training Details](#training-details)
|
34 |
+
5. [Evaluation](#evaluation)
|
35 |
+
6. [Model Architecture and Objective](#model-architecture-and-objective)
|
36 |
+
7. [Citation](#citation)
|
37 |
|
38 |
|
39 |
## Model Details
|
40 |
|
41 |
+
![image/png](https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/6579e0eaa9e58aec614e9d97/WULSDLsCVs7RNEs9KB0Lr.png)
|
42 |
|
43 |
+
> The YOLO series has become the most popular framework for real-time object detection due to its reasonable trade-off between speed and accuracy.
|
44 |
However, we observe that the speed and accuracy of YOLOs are negatively affected by the NMS.
|
45 |
Recently, end-to-end Transformer-based detectors (DETRs) have provided an alternative to eliminating NMS.
|
46 |
Nevertheless, the high computational cost limits their practicality and hinders them from fully exploiting the advantage of excluding NMS.
|
|
|
55 |
Furthermore, RT-DETR-R50 outperforms DINO-R50 by 2.2% AP in accuracy and about 21 times in FPS.
|
56 |
After pre-training with Objects365, RT-DETR-R50 / R101 achieves 55.3% / 56.2% AP. The project page: this [https URL](https://zhao-yian.github.io/RTDETR/).
|
57 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
59 |
+
|
60 |
+
This is the model card of a 🤗 [transformers](https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/index) model that has been pushed on the Hub.
|
61 |
|
62 |
- **Developed by:** Yian Zhao and Sangbum Choi
|
63 |
+
- **Funded by:** National Key R&D Program of China (No.2022ZD0118201), Natural Science Foundation of China (No.61972217, 32071459, 62176249, 62006133, 62271465),
|
64 |
and the Shenzhen Medical Research Funds in China (No.
|
65 |
B2302037).
|
66 |
+
- **Shared by:** Sangbum Choi
|
67 |
+
- **Model type:** [RT-DETR](https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/main/en/model_doc/rt_detr)
|
|
|
68 |
- **License:** Apache-2.0
|
|
|
69 |
|
70 |
+
### Model Sources
|
71 |
|
72 |
<!-- Provide the basic links for the model. -->
|
73 |
|
74 |
+
- **HF Docs:** [RT-DETR](https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/main/en/model_doc/rt_detr)
|
75 |
- **Repository:** https://github.com/lyuwenyu/RT-DETR
|
76 |
+
- **Paper:** https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.08069
|
77 |
+
- **Demo:** [RT-DETR Tracking](https://huggingface.co/spaces/merve/RT-DETR-tracking-coco)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
79 |
## How to Get Started with the Model
|
80 |
|
81 |
Use the code below to get started with the model.
|
82 |
|
83 |
+
```python
|
84 |
import torch
|
85 |
import requests
|
86 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
128 |
<!-- This relates heavily to the Technical Specifications. Content here should link to that section when it is relevant to the training procedure. -->
|
129 |
|
130 |
+
We conduct experiments on COCO and Objects365 datasets, where RT-DETR is trained on COCO train2017 and validated on COCO val2017 dataset.
|
131 |
+
We report the standard COCO metrics, including AP (averaged over uniformly sampled IoU thresholds ranging from 0.50-0.95 with a step size of 0.05),
|
132 |
+
AP50, AP75, as well as AP at different scales: APS, APM, APL.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133 |
|
134 |
+
### Preprocessing
|
135 |
|
136 |
+
Images are resized to 640x640 pixels and rescaled with `image_mean=[0.485, 0.456, 0.406]` and `image_std=[0.229, 0.224, 0.225]`.
|
137 |
|
138 |
+
### Training Hyperparameters
|
139 |
|
140 |
- **Training regime:** <!--fp32, fp16 mixed precision, bf16 mixed precision, bf16 non-mixed precision, fp16 non-mixed precision, fp8 mixed precision -->
|
141 |
|
142 |
![image/png](https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/6579e0eaa9e58aec614e9d97/E15I9MwZCtwNIms-W8Ra9.png)
|
143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144 |
|
145 |
## Evaluation
|
146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147 |
|
148 |
+
| Model | #Epochs | #Params (M) | GFLOPs | FPS_bs=1 | AP (val) | AP50 (val) | AP75 (val) | AP-s (val) | AP-m (val) | AP-l (val) |
|
149 |
+
|----------------------------|---------|-------------|--------|----------|--------|-----------|-----------|----------|----------|----------|
|
150 |
+
| RT-DETR-R18 | 72 | 20 | 60.7 | 217 | 46.5 | 63.8 | 50.4 | 28.4 | 49.8 | 63.0 |
|
151 |
+
| RT-DETR-R34 | 72 | 31 | 91.0 | 172 | 48.5 | 66.2 | 52.3 | 30.2 | 51.9 | 66.2 |
|
152 |
+
| RT-DETR R50 | 72 | 42 | 136 | 108 | 53.1 | 71.3 | 57.7 | 34.8 | 58.0 | 70.0 |
|
153 |
+
| RT-DETR R101| 72 | 76 | 259 | 74 | 54.3 | 72.7 | 58.6 | 36.0 | 58.8 | 72.1 |
|
154 |
+
| RT-DETR-R18 (Objects 365 pretrained) | 60 | 20 | 61 | 217 | 49.2 | 66.6 | 53.5 | 33.2 | 52.3 | 64.8 |
|
155 |
+
| RT-DETR-R50 (Objects 365 pretrained) | 24 | 42 | 136 | 108 | 55.3 | 73.4 | 60.1 | 37.9 | 59.9 | 71.8 |
|
156 |
+
| RT-DETR-R101 (Objects 365 pretrained) | 24 | 76 | 259 | 74 | 56.2 | 74.6 | 61.3 | 38.3 | 60.5 | 73.5 |
|
157 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159 |
|
160 |
### Model Architecture and Objective
|
161 |
|
162 |
![image/png](https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/6579e0eaa9e58aec614e9d97/sdIwTRlHNwPzyBNwHja60.png)
|
163 |
|
164 |
+
Overview of RT-DETR. We feed the features from the last three stages of the backbone into the encoder. The efficient hybrid
|
165 |
+
encoder transforms multi-scale features into a sequence of image features through the Attention-based Intra-scale Feature Interaction (AIFI)
|
166 |
+
and the CNN-based Cross-scale Feature Fusion (CCFF). Then, the uncertainty-minimal query selection selects a fixed number of encoder
|
167 |
+
features to serve as initial object queries for the decoder. Finally, the decoder with auxiliary prediction heads iteratively optimizes object
|
168 |
+
queries to generate categories and boxes.
|
169 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
171 |
+
## Citation
|
|
|
|
|
172 |
|
173 |
<!-- If there is a paper or blog post introducing the model, the APA and Bibtex information for that should go in this section. -->
|
174 |
|
|
|
185 |
}
|
186 |
```
|
187 |
|
188 |
+
## Model Card Authors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189 |
|
190 |
+
[Sangbum Choi](https://huggingface.co/danelcsb)
|
191 |
+
[Pavel Iakubovskii](https://huggingface.co/qubvel-hf)
|
192 |
|
|