Is this model re-licensed?
I have read your model card, and I see that base model is under LLAMA license, which is proprietary as it restricts creators how to use it commercially, but then I see on this model that it is based on the other one but under free software license.
I guess that is legal mistake though I wish it would be under Apache 2.0 but I don't think you were allowed by META to re-license it.
In general, I am using only free software models like MIT license, GNU GPL, AGPL, or Apache 2.0 or Creative Commons free licenses (there are those restrictive), but in this case I think, but cannot be sure, you made legal mistake.
My suggestion is that you always choose free software model, so that you do not enter into such mistakes.
Imagine getting court problem with META supremacy.
What is Free Software? - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
Meta’s LLaMa 2 license is not Open Source – Open Source Initiative
https://opensource.org/blog/metas-llama-2-license-is-not-open-source
Various Licenses and Comments about Them - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html
Yeah this was just the first default option in the Huggingface interface, I will be updating all my models to use the correct license this year.