github_repo_scraped
/
repos
/GrahamDumpleton-wrapt-f29f697
/blog
/13-ordering-issues-when-monkey-patching-in-python.md
Ordering issues when monkey patching in Python | |
============================================== | |
In my recent post about [safely applying monkey patches in Python]( | |
11-safely-applying-monkey-patches-in-python.md), I mentioned how one of the | |
issues that arises is when a monkey patch is applied. Specifically, if the | |
module you need to monkey patch has already been imported and was being | |
used by other code, that it could have created a local reference to a | |
target function you wish to wrap, in its own namespace. So although your | |
monkey patch would work fine where the original function was used direct | |
from the module, you would not cover where it was used via a local | |
reference. | |
Coincidentally, Ned Batchelder recently [posted]( | |
http://nedbatchelder.com//blog/201503/finding_temp_file_creators.html) | |
about using monkey patching to debug an issue where temporary directories | |
were not being cleaned up properly. Ned described this exact issue in | |
relation to wanting to monkey patch the `mkdtemp()` function from the | |
`tempfile` module. In that case he was able to find an alternate place | |
within the private implementation for the module to patch so as to avoid | |
the problem. Using some internal function like this may not always be | |
possible however. | |
What I want to start discussing with this post is mechanisms one can use | |
from wrapt to deal with this issue of ordering. A major part of the | |
solution is what are called post import hooks. This is a mechanism which | |
was described in [PEP 369]( | |
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0369/) and although it never made it | |
into the Python core, it is still possible to graft this ability into | |
Python using existing APIs. From this we can then add additional | |
capabilities for discovering monkey patching code and automatically apply | |
it when modules are imported, before other modules get the module and so | |
before they can create a reference to a function in their own namespace. | |
Post import hook mechanism | |
-------------------------- | |
In PEP 369, a primary use case presented was illustrated by the example: | |
```python | |
import imp | |
@imp.when_imported('decimal') | |
def register(decimal): | |
Inexact.register(decimal.Decimal) | |
``` | |
The basic idea is that when this code was seen it would cause a callback to | |
be registered within the Python import system such that when the 'decimal' | |
module was imported, that the 'register()' function which the decorator had | |
been applied to, would be called. The argument to the 'register()' function | |
would be the reference to the module the registration had been against. The | |
function could then perform some action against the module before it was | |
returned to whatever code originally requested the import. | |
Instead of using the decorator '@imp.when_imported' decorator, one could | |
also explicitly use the 'imp.register_post_import_hook()' function to | |
register a post import hook. | |
```python | |
import imp | |
def register(decimal): | |
Inexact.register(decimal.Decimal) | |
imp.register_post_import_hook(register, 'decimal') | |
``` | |
Although PEP 369 was never incorporated into Python, the wrapt module | |
provides implementations for both the decorator and the function, but | |
within the `wrapt` module rather than `imp`. | |
Now what neither the decorator or the function really solved alone was the | |
ordering issue. That is, you still had the problem that these could be | |
triggered after the target module had already been imported. In this case | |
the post import hook function would still be called, albeit for our case | |
too late to get in before the reference to the function we want to monkey | |
patch had been created in a different namespace. | |
The simplest solution to this problem is to modify the main Python script | |
for your application and setup all the post import hook registrations you | |
need as the absolute very first thing that is done. That is, before any | |
other modules are imported from your application or even modules from the | |
standard library used to parse any command line arguments. | |
Even if you are able to do this, because though the registration functions | |
require an actual callable, it does mean you are preloading the code to | |
perform all the monkey patches. This could be a problem if they in turn had | |
to import further modules as the state of your application may not yet have | |
been setup such that those imports would succeed. | |
They say though that one level of indirection can solve all problems and | |
this is an example of where that principle can be applied. That is, rather | |
than import the monkey patching code, you can setup a registration which | |
would only lazily load the monkey patching code itself if the module to be | |
patched was imported, and then execute it. | |
```python | |
import sys | |
from wrapt import register_post_import_hook | |
def load_and_execute(name): | |
def _load_and_execute(target_module): | |
__import__(name) | |
patch_module = sys.modules[name] | |
getattr(patch_module, 'apply_patch')(target_module) | |
return _load_and_execute | |
register_post_import_hook(load_and_execute('patch_tempfile'), 'tempfile') | |
``` | |
In the module file `patch_tempfile.py` we would now have: | |
```python | |
from wrapt import wrap_function_wrapper | |
def _mkdtemp_wrapper(wrapped, instance, args, kwargs): | |
print 'calling', wrapped.__name__ | |
return wrapped(*args, **kwargs) | |
def apply_patch(module): | |
print 'patching', module.__name__ | |
wrap_function_wrapper(module, 'mkdtemp', _mkdtemp_wrapper) | |
``` | |
Running the first script with the interactive interpreter so as to leave us | |
in the interpreter, we can then show what happens when we import the | |
'tempfile' module and execute the 'mkdtemp()' function. | |
```sh | |
$ python -i lazyloader.py | |
``` | |
```pycon | |
>>> import tempfile | |
patching tempfile | |
>>> tempfile.mkdtemp() | |
calling mkdtemp | |
'/var/folders/0p/4vcv19pj5d72m_bx0h40sw340000gp/T/tmpfB8r20' | |
``` | |
In other words, unlike how most monkey patching is done, we aren't forcibly | |
importing a module in order to apply the monkey patches on the basis it | |
might be used. Instead the monkey patching code stays dormant and unused | |
until the target module is later imported. If the target module is never | |
imported, the monkey patch code for that module is itself not even | |
imported. | |
Discovery of post import hooks | |
------------------------------ | |
Post import hooks as described provide a slightly better way of setting up | |
monkey patches so they are applied. This is because they are only activated | |
if the target module containing the function to be patched is even | |
imported. This avoids unnecessarily importing modules you may not even use, | |
and which otherwise would increase memory usage of your application. | |
Ordering is still important and as a result it is important to ensure that | |
any post import hook registrations are setup before any other modules are | |
imported. You also need to modify your application code every time you want | |
to change what monkey patches are applied. This latter point could be | |
inconvenient if only wanting to add monkey patches infrequently for the | |
purposes of debugging issues. | |
A solution to the latter issue is to separate out monkey patches into | |
separately installed modules and use a registration mechanism to announce | |
their availability. Python applications could then have common boiler plate | |
code executed at the very start which discovers based on supplied | |
configuration what monkey patches should be applied. The registration | |
mechanism would then allow the monkey patch modules to be discovered at | |
runtime. | |
One particular registration mechanism which can be used here is | |
'setuptools' entry points. Using this we can package up monkey patches so | |
they could be separately installed ready for use. The structure of such a | |
package would be: | |
``` | |
setup.py | |
src/__init__.py | |
src/tempfile_debugging.py | |
``` | |
The `setup.py` file for this package will be: | |
```python | |
from setuptools import setup | |
NAME = 'wrapt_patches.tempfile_debugging' | |
def patch_module(module, function=None): | |
function = function or 'patch_%s' % module.replace('.', '_') | |
return '%s = %s:%s' % (module, NAME, function) | |
ENTRY_POINTS = [ | |
patch_module('tempfile'), | |
] | |
setup_kwargs = dict( | |
name = NAME, | |
version = '0.1', | |
packages = ['wrapt_patches'], | |
package_dir = {'wrapt_patches': 'src'}, | |
entry_points = { NAME: ENTRY_POINTS }, | |
) | |
setup(**setup_kwargs) | |
``` | |
As a convention so that our monkey patch modules are easily identifiable we | |
use a namespace package. The parent package in this case will be | |
'wrapt_patches' since we are working with wrapt specifically. | |
The name for this specific package will be | |
'wrapt_patches.tempfile_debugging' as the theoretical intent is that we are | |
going to create some monkey patches to help us debug use of the 'tempfile' | |
module, along the lines of what Ned described in his blog post. | |
The key part of the 'setup.py' file is the definition of the | |
'entry_points'. This will be set to a dictionary mapping the package name | |
to a list of definitions listing what Python modules this package contains | |
monkey patches for. | |
The `src/__init__.py` file will then contain: | |
```python | |
import pkgutil | |
__path__ = pkgutil.extend_path(__path__, __name__) | |
``` | |
as is required when creating a namespace package. | |
Finally, the monkey patches will actually be contained in | |
'src/tempfile_debugging.py' and for now is much like what we had before. | |
```python | |
from wrapt import wrap_function_wrapper | |
def _mkdtemp_wrapper(wrapped, instance, args, kwargs): | |
print 'calling', wrapped.__name__ | |
return wrapped(*args, **kwargs) | |
def patch_tempfile(module): | |
print 'patching', module.__name__ | |
wrap_function_wrapper(module, 'mkdtemp', _mkdtemp_wrapper) | |
``` | |
With the package defined we would install it into the Python installation | |
or virtual environment being used. | |
In place now of the explicit registrations which we previously added at the | |
very start of the Python application main script file, we would instead | |
add: | |
```python | |
import os | |
from wrapt import discover_post_import_hooks | |
patches = os.environ.get('WRAPT_PATCHES') | |
if patches: | |
for name in patches.split(','): | |
name = name.strip() | |
if name: | |
print 'discover', name | |
discover_post_import_hooks(name) | |
``` | |
If we were to run the application with no specific configuration to enable | |
the monkey patches then nothing would happen. If however they were enabled, | |
then they would be automatically discovered and applied as necessary. | |
```sh | |
$ WRAPT_PATCHES=wrapt_patches.tempfile_debugging python -i entrypoints.py | |
``` | |
```pycon | |
discover wrapt_patches.tempfile_debugging | |
>>> import tempfile | |
patching tempfile | |
``` | |
What would be ideal is if PEP 369 ever did make it into the core of Python | |
that a similar bootstrapping mechanism be incorporated into Python itself | |
so that it was possible to force registration of monkey patches very early | |
during interpreter initialisation. Having this in place we would have a | |
guaranteed way of addressing the ordering issue when doing monkey patching. | |
As that doesn't exist right now, what we did in this case was modify our | |
Python application to add the bootstrap code ourselves. This is fine where | |
you control the Python application you want to be able to potentially apply | |
monkey patches to, but what if you wanted to monkey patch a third party | |
application and you didn't want to have to modify its code. What are the | |
options in that case? | |
As it turns out there are some tricks that can be used in that case. I will | |
discuss such options for monkey patching a Python application you can't | |
actually modify in my next blog post on this topic of monkey patching. | |