github_repo_scraped
/
repos
/GrahamDumpleton-wrapt-f29f697
/blog
/14-automatic-patching-of-python-applications.md
Automatic patching of Python applications | |
========================================= | |
In my [previous posts]( | |
13-ordering-issues-when-monkey-patching-in-python.md) on monkey patching I | |
discussed the ordering problem. That is, that the ability to properly | |
monkey patch is dependent on whether we can get in before any other code | |
has already imported the module we want to patch. The specific issue in | |
this case is where other code has imported a reference to a function within | |
a module by name and stored that in it is own namespace. In other words, | |
where it has used: | |
```python | |
from module import function | |
``` | |
If we can't get in early enough, then it becomes necessary to monkey patch | |
all such uses of a target function as well, which in the general case is | |
impossible as we will not know where the function has been imported. | |
Part of the solution I described for this was to use a post import hook | |
mechanism to allow us to get access to a module for monkey patching before | |
the module is even returned back to any code where it is being imported. | |
This technique is still though dependent on the post import hook mechanism | |
itself being installed before any other code is effectively run. This means | |
having to manually modify the main Python script file for an application, | |
something which isn't always practical. | |
The point of this post is to look at how we can avoid the need to even | |
modify that main Python script file. For this there are a few techniques | |
that could be used. I am going to look at the most evil of those techniques | |
first and then talk about others in a subsequent post. | |
Executable code in .pth files | |
----------------------------- | |
As part of the Python import system and how it determines what directories | |
are searched for Python modules, there is a mechanism whereby for a package | |
it is possible to install a file with a .pth extension into the Python | |
'site-packages' directory. The actual Python package code itself then might | |
actually be installed in a different location not actually on the Python | |
module search path, most often actually in a versioned subdirectory of the | |
'site-packages' directory. The purpose of the .pth file is to act as a | |
pointer to where the actual code for the Python package lives. | |
In the simple case the .pth file will contain a relative or absolute path | |
name to the name of the actual directory containing the code for the Python | |
package. In the case of it being a relative path name, then it will be | |
taken relative to the directory in which the .pth file is located. | |
With such .pth files in place, when the Python interpreter is initialising | |
itself and setting up the Python module search path, after it has added in | |
all the default directories to be searched, it will look through the | |
site-packages directory and parse each .pth file, adding to the final list | |
of directories to be searched any directories specified within the .pth | |
files. | |
Now at one point in the history of Python this .pth mechanism was enhanced | |
to allow for a special case. This special case was that if a line in the | |
.pth file started with import, the line would be executed as Python code | |
instead of simply adding it as a directory to the list of directories to be | |
searched for modules. | |
I am told this originally was to allow special startup code to be executed | |
for a module to allow registration of a non standard codec for Unicode. It | |
has though since also been used in the implementation of easy_install and | |
if you have ever run easy-install and looked at the easy-install.pth file | |
in the site-packages directory you will find some code which looks like: | |
```python | |
import sys; sys.__plen = len(sys.path) | |
./antigravity-0.1-py2.7.egg | |
import sys; new=sys.path[sys.__plen:]; del sys.path[sys.__plen:]; p=getattr(sys,'__egginsert',0); sys.path[p:p]=new; sys.__egginsert = p+len(new) | |
``` | |
So as long as you can fit the code on one line, you can potentially do some | |
quite nasty stuff inside of a .pth file every time that the Python | |
interpreter is run. | |
Personally I find the concept of executable code inside of a .pth file | |
really dangerous and up until now have avoided relying on this feature of | |
.pth files. | |
My concerns over executable code in .pth files is the fact that it is | |
always run. This means that even if you had installed a pre built RPM/DEB | |
package or a Python wheel into a system wide Python installation, with the | |
idea that this was somehow much safer because you were avoiding running the | |
setup.py file for a package as the root user, the .pth file means that the | |
package can still subsequently run code without you realising and without | |
you even having imported the module into any application. | |
If one wanted to be paranoid about security, then Python should really have | |
a whitelisting mechanism for what .pth files you wanted to trust and allow | |
code to be executed from every time the Python interpreter is run, | |
especially as the root user. | |
I will leave that discussion up to others if anyone else cares to be | |
concerned and for now at least will show how this feature of .pth files can | |
be used (abused) to implement a mechanism for automated monkey patching of | |
any Python application being run. | |
Adding Python import hooks | |
-------------------------- | |
In the previous post where I talked about the post import hook mechanism, | |
the code I gave as needing to be able to be manually added at the start of | |
any Python application script file was: | |
```python | |
import os | |
from wrapt import discover_post_import_hooks | |
patches = os.environ.get('WRAPT_PATCHES') | |
if patches: | |
for name in patches.split(','): | |
name = name.strip() | |
if name: | |
print 'discover', name | |
discover_post_import_hooks(name) | |
``` | |
What this was doing was using an environment variable as the source of | |
names for any packages registered using setuptools entry points that | |
contained monkey patches we wanted to have applied. | |
Knowing about the ability to have executable code in .pth files, lets now | |
work out how we can use that to instead have this code executed | |
automatically every time the Python interpreter is run, thereby avoiding | |
the need to manually modify every Python application we want to have monkey | |
patches applied to. | |
In practice however, the code we will need is actually going to have to be | |
slightly more complicated than this and as a result not something that can | |
be readily added directly to a .pth file due to the limitation of code | |
needing to all be on one line. What we will therefore do is put all our | |
code in a separate module and execute it from there. We don't want to be too | |
nasty and import that module every time though, perhaps scaring users when | |
they see it imported even if not used, so we will gate even that by the | |
presence of the environment variable. | |
What we can therefore use in our ‘.pth’ is: | |
```python | |
import os, sys; os.environ.get('AUTOWRAPT_BOOTSTRAP') and __import__('autowrapt.bootstrap') and sys.modules['autowrapt.bootstrap'].bootstrap() | |
``` | |
That is, if the environment variable is set to a non empty value only then | |
do we import our module containing our bootstrap code and execute it. | |
As to the bootstrap code, this is where things get a bit messy. We can't | |
just use the code we had used before when manually modifying the Python | |
application script file. This is because of where in the Python interpreter | |
initialisation the parsing of .pth files is done. | |
The problems are twofold. The first issue with executing the discovery of | |
the import hooks directly when the .pth file is processed is that the order | |
in which they are processed is unknown and so at the point our code is run | |
the final Python module search path may not have been setup. The second | |
issue is that .pth file processing is done before any sitecustomize.py or | |
usercustomize.py processing has been done. The Python interpreter therefore | |
may not be in its final configured state. We therefore have to be a little | |
bit careful of what we do. | |
What we really want is to defer any actions until the Python interpreter | |
initialisation has been completed. The problem is how we achieve that. | |
Python interpreter ‘site’ module | |
-------------------------------- | |
The actual final parts of Python interpreter initialisation is performed | |
from the main() function of the site module: | |
```python | |
def main(): | |
global ENABLE_USER_SITE | |
abs__file__() | |
known_paths = removeduppaths() | |
if ENABLE_USER_SITE is None: | |
ENABLE_USER_SITE = check_enableusersite() | |
known_paths = addusersitepackages(known_paths) | |
known_paths = addsitepackages(known_paths) | |
if sys.platform == 'os2emx': | |
setBEGINLIBPATH() | |
setquit() | |
setcopyright() | |
sethelper() | |
aliasmbcs() | |
setencoding() | |
execsitecustomize() | |
if ENABLE_USER_SITE: | |
execusercustomize() | |
# Remove sys.setdefaultencoding() so that users cannot change the | |
# encoding after initialization. The test for presence is needed when | |
# this module is run as a script, because this code is executed twice. | |
if hasattr(sys, "setdefaultencoding"): | |
del sys.setdefaultencoding | |
``` | |
The .pth parsing and code execution we want to rely upon is done within the | |
addsitepackages() function. | |
What we really want therefore is to defer any execution of our code until | |
after the functions execsitecustomize() or execusercustomize() are run. The | |
way to achieve that is to monkey patch those two functions and trigger our | |
code when they have completed. | |
We have to monkey patch both because the usercustomize.py processing is | |
optional dependent on whether ENABLE_USER_SITE is true or not. Our | |
'bootstrap() function therefore needs to look like: | |
```python | |
def _execsitecustomize_wrapper(wrapped): | |
def _execsitecustomize(*args, **kwargs): | |
try: | |
return wrapped(*args, **kwargs) | |
finally: | |
if not site.ENABLE_USER_SITE: | |
_register_bootstrap_functions() | |
return _execsitecustomize | |
def _execusercustomize_wrapper(wrapped): | |
def _execusercustomize(*args, **kwargs): | |
try: | |
return wrapped(*args, **kwargs) | |
finally: | |
_register_bootstrap_functions() | |
return _execusercustomize | |
def bootstrap(): | |
site.execsitecustomize = _execsitecustomize_wrapper(site.execsitecustomize) | |
site.execusercustomize = _execusercustomize_wrapper(site.execusercustomize) | |
``` | |
Despite everything I have ever said about how manually constructed monkey | |
patches is bad and that the wrapt module should be used for doing monkey | |
patching, we can't actually use the wrapt module in this case. This is | |
because technically, as a user installed package, the wrapt package may not | |
be usable at this point. This could occur where wrapt was installed in such | |
a way that the ability to import it was itself dependent on the processing | |
of .pth files. As a result we drop down to using a simple wrapper using a | |
function closure. | |
In the actual wrappers, you can see how which of the two wrappers actually | |
ends up calling _register_bootstrap_functions() is dependent on whether | |
ENABLE_USER_SITE is true or not, only calling it in execsitecustomize() if | |
support for usersitecustomize was enabled. | |
Finally we now have our `_register_bootstrap_functions()` defined as: | |
```python | |
_registered = False | |
def _register_bootstrap_functions(): | |
global _registered | |
if _registered: | |
return | |
_registered = True | |
from wrapt import discover_post_import_hooks | |
for name in os.environ.get('AUTOWRAPT_BOOTSTRAP', '').split(','): | |
discover_post_import_hooks(name) | |
``` | |
Bundling it up as a package | |
--------------------------- | |
We have worked out the various bits we require, but how do we get this | |
installed, in particular how do we get the custom .pth file installed. For | |
that we use a setup.py file of: | |
```python | |
import sys | |
import os | |
from setuptools import setup | |
from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib | |
setup_kwargs = dict( | |
name = 'autowrapt', | |
packages = ['autowrapt'], | |
package_dir = {'autowrapt': 'src'}, | |
data_files = [(get_python_lib(prefix=''), ['autowrapt-init.pth'])], | |
entry_points = {'autowrapt.examples’: ['this = autowrapt.examples:autowrapt_this']}, | |
install_requires = ['wrapt>=1.10.4'], | |
) | |
setup(**setup_kwargs) | |
``` | |
To get that .pth installed we have used the data_files argument to the | |
setup() call. The actual location for installing the file is determined | |
using the get_python_lib() function from the distutils.sysconfig module. | |
The prefix' argument of an empty string ensures that a relative path for | |
the site-packages directory where Python packages should be installed is | |
used rather than an absolute path. | |
Very important when installing this package though is that you cannot use | |
easy_install or python setup.py install. One can only install this package | |
using pip. | |
The reason for this is that if not using pip, then the package installation | |
tool can install the package as an egg. In this situation the custom .pth | |
file will actually be installed within the egg directory and not actually | |
within the site-packages directory. | |
The only .pth file added to the site-packages directory will be that used | |
to map that the autowrapt package exists in the sub directory. The | |
addsitepackages() function called from the site module doesn't in turn | |
process .pth files contained in a directory added by a .pth file, so our | |
custom .pth file would be skipped. | |
When using ‘pip’ it doesn’t use eggs by default and so we are okay. | |
Also do be aware that this package will not work with buildout as it will | |
always install packages as eggs and explicitly sets up the Python module | |
search path itself in any Python scripts installed into the Python | |
installation. | |
Trying out an example | |
--------------------- | |
The actual complete source code for this package can be found at: | |
* https://github.com/GrahamDumpleton/autowrapt | |
The package has also been released on PyPi as autowrapt so you can actually | |
try it, and use it if you really want to. | |
To allow for a easy quick test to see that it works, the autowrapt package | |
bundles an example monkey patch. In the above setup.py this was set up by: | |
```python | |
entry_points = {'autowrapt.examples’: ['this = autowrapt.examples:autowrapt_this']}, | |
``` | |
This entry point definition names a monkey patch with the name | |
autowrapt.examples. The definition says that when the this module is | |
installed, the monkey patch function autowrapt_this() in the module | |
autowrapt.examples will be called. | |
So to run the test do: | |
``` | |
pip install autowrapt | |
``` | |
This should also install the wrapt module if you don't have the required | |
minimum version. | |
Now run the command line interpreter as normal and at the prompt do: | |
```python | |
import this | |
``` | |
This should result in the Zen of Python being displayed. | |
Exit the Python interpreter and now instead run: | |
``` | |
AUTOWRAPT_BOOTSTRAP=autowrapt.examples python | |
``` | |
This runs the Python interpreter again, but also sets the environment | |
variable `AUTOWRAPT_BOOTSTRAP` with the value `autowrapt.examples` matching the | |
name of the entry point defined in the setup.py file for autowrapt. | |
The actual code for the `autowrapt_this()` function was: | |
```python | |
from __future__ import print_function | |
def autowrapt_this(module): | |
print('The wrapt package is absolutely amazing and you should use it.') | |
``` | |
so if we now again run: | |
```python | |
import this | |
``` | |
we should now see an extended version of the Zen of Python. | |
We didn't actually monkey patch any code in the target module in this case, | |
but it shows that the monkey patch function was actually triggered when | |
expected. | |
Other bootstrapping mechanisms | |
------------------------------ | |
Although this mechanism is reasonably clean and only requires the setting | |
of an environment variable, it cannot be used with buildout as mentioned. | |
For buildout we need to investigate other approaches we could use to | |
achieve the same affect. I will cover such other options in the next blog | |
post on this topic. | |