Dataset Viewer

The dataset viewer is not available because its heuristics could not detect any supported data files. You can try uploading some data files, or configuring the data files location manually.

πŸ§ͺ TestGenius AI

AI Test Case Generation Agent for QA Teams

Multi-Agent Iterative Refinement β€’ Behavior Coverage Mapping β€’ Mutation-Guided Testing

Production Ready Research Grade Universal LLM

Not just another GPT wrapper. A 5-agent pipeline that generates, validates, and iteratively improves tests using mutation testing feedback β€” inspired by MuTAP (ISSTA 2023).


🎯 Problem

"Writing comprehensive test cases manually is time-consuming and often misses edge cases."

QA teams spend 40-60% of their time writing tests. They miss edge cases, security vulnerabilities, and integration failures. Existing AI tools (Copilot, basic GPT wrappers) do single-shot generation with no validation β€” producing tests that look good but don't catch real bugs.

TestGenius AI is different. It doesn't just generate β€” it analyzes, generates, validates, refines iteratively, and maps behavior coverage.


🧠 Research-Grade Architecture (The Key Differentiator)

Inspired by: MuTAP (arxiv:2308.16557, ISSTA 2023) + HITS (ASE 2024) + Code Agents (arxiv:2406.12952)

β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
β”‚              TESTGENIUS MULTI-AGENT PIPELINE                          β”‚
β”œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€
β”‚                                                                       β”‚
β”‚  INPUT (code/requirements/API spec)                                  β”‚
β”‚         β”‚                                                             β”‚
β”‚         β–Ό                                                             β”‚
β”‚  β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”                     β”‚
β”‚  β”‚ AGENT 1: ANALYZER                            β”‚                     β”‚
β”‚  β”‚ β€’ AST-based complexity scoring               β”‚                     β”‚
β”‚  β”‚ β€’ Behavior extraction (testable behaviors)   β”‚                     β”‚
β”‚  β”‚ β€’ Coverage gap detection                     β”‚                     β”‚
β”‚  β”‚ β€’ Function prioritization (complex = more tests) β”‚                β”‚
β”‚  β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜                     β”‚
β”‚                          β–Ό                                            β”‚
β”‚  β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”                     β”‚
β”‚  β”‚ AGENT 2: GENERATOR                           β”‚                     β”‚
β”‚  β”‚ β€’ Context-rich structured prompt             β”‚                     β”‚
β”‚  β”‚ β€’ Behavior-guided generation (tests PER behavior) β”‚               β”‚
β”‚  β”‚ β€’ Framework-specific (pytest/Jest/Cypress)   β”‚                     β”‚
β”‚  β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜                     β”‚
β”‚                          β–Ό                                            β”‚
β”‚  β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”                     β”‚
β”‚  β”‚ AGENT 3: VALIDATOR                           β”‚                     β”‚
β”‚  β”‚ β€’ Quality scoring (5 dimensions, A-D grade)  β”‚                     β”‚
β”‚  β”‚ β€’ Assertion density check                    β”‚                     β”‚
β”‚  β”‚ β€’ Edge case coverage measurement             β”‚                     β”‚
β”‚  β”‚ β€’ Identifies WHAT'S WEAK in the tests        β”‚                     β”‚
β”‚  β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜                     β”‚
β”‚                          β–Ό                                            β”‚
β”‚  β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”                     β”‚
β”‚  β”‚ AGENT 4: REFINER (MuTAP-inspired loop)       β”‚   ← ITERATES       β”‚
β”‚  β”‚ β€’ Identifies surviving mutations             β”‚      until           β”‚
β”‚  β”‚ β€’ Re-prompts LLM with mutation feedback      β”‚      quality β‰₯ B    β”‚
β”‚  β”‚ β€’ Strengthens weak tests automatically       β”‚                     β”‚
β”‚  β”‚ β€’ Adds tests that KILL surviving mutants     β”‚                     β”‚
β”‚  β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜                     β”‚
β”‚                          β–Ό                                            β”‚
β”‚  β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”                     β”‚
β”‚  β”‚ AGENT 5: COVERAGE MAPPER                     β”‚                     β”‚
β”‚  β”‚ β€’ Maps tests β†’ behaviors (which ARE tested)  β”‚                     β”‚
β”‚  β”‚ β€’ Shows UNTESTED behaviors (red flags)       β”‚                     β”‚
β”‚  β”‚ β€’ Coverage % by category (happy/edge/error/security) β”‚            β”‚
β”‚  β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜                     β”‚
β”‚                                                                       β”‚
β”‚  OUTPUT: Tests + Quality Grade + Behavior Coverage Map                β”‚
β”‚          + Refinement History + Untested Behavior Warnings            β”‚
β”‚                                                                       β”‚
β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜

Why this beats every other hackathon submission:

  • Single-shot generators (Copilot, GPT wrappers): Generate once, no validation β†’ produce tests that miss bugs
  • TestGenius: Generate β†’ Score β†’ Identify weaknesses β†’ Re-generate stronger tests β†’ Verify coverage

✨ 8 Novelty Features

# Feature Research Basis What It Does
1 πŸ”„ Iterative Refinement MuTAP (ISSTA'23) Tests improve across iterations using mutation feedback
2 πŸ“Š Behavior Coverage Qodo/CodiumAI concept Maps WHICH behaviors are tested vs untested
3 🧬 Mutation-Guided Testing MuTAP + EvoSuite Identifies test gaps where mutations would survive
4 🧠 Code Complexity Analysis McCabe (1976) AST-based cyclomatic complexity β†’ prioritizes testing
5 πŸ” Coverage Gap Detection Static analysis Finds untested error paths, branches, external calls
6 πŸ“ˆ Test Quality Scoring Test smell research Grades tests A-D on 5 dimensions
7 πŸ” API Security Scanner OWASP Top 10 Detects injection points, missing auth, path traversal
8 πŸ€– Multi-Agent Architecture Code Agents (arxiv:2406.12952) 5 specialized agents, not one monolithic prompt

πŸš€ Quick Start

# Backend
cd backend
pip install -r requirements.txt
cp .env.example .env   # Set LLM_BASE_URL, LLM_API_KEY, LLM_MODEL
uvicorn app.main:app --reload --port 8000

# Frontend  
cd frontend
npm install && npm run dev
# β†’ http://localhost:5173

Docker (Full Stack)

cp backend/.env.example backend/.env  # Set your LLM API key
docker-compose up -d
# β†’ Backend: http://localhost:8000/docs
# β†’ Frontend: http://localhost:3000

Custom LLM (.env)

# Works with ANY OpenAI-compatible API:
LLM_BASE_URL=https://api.groq.com/openai/v1
LLM_API_KEY=gsk_your_key
LLM_MODEL=llama-3.3-70b-versatile

Supports: Groq, Featherless, OpenAI, Together, DeepSeek, OpenRouter, Mistral, Ollama, LM Studio


πŸ“‘ API Endpoints

Method Endpoint Description
POST /api/v1/generate/from-requirements Generate from product requirements
POST /api/v1/generate/from-api-spec Generate from OpenAPI/Swagger
POST /api/v1/generate/from-code Generate unit tests from source code
POST /api/v1/generate/from-flow Generate E2E tests from user flow
POST /api/v1/generate/unified All inputs β†’ full test suite
POST /api/v1/generate/multi-agent 🧠 Multi-agent iterative pipeline
POST /api/v1/generate/multi-agent/stream Streaming SSE pipeline
POST /api/v1/analyze/behaviors Extract testable behaviors
POST /api/v1/analyze/complexity AST complexity analysis
POST /api/v1/analyze/security OWASP API security scan
POST /api/v1/analyze/mutations Identify mutation points
POST /api/v1/analyze/mutations/execute 🧬 Run real mutation testing
POST /api/v1/analyze/quality Score test quality (A-D)
POST /api/v1/analyze/gaps Coverage gap detection
GET /api/v1/usage Token usage & cost tracking
GET /api/v1/frameworks Supported frameworks
GET /api/v1/provider Current LLM provider info
GET /health System health + capabilities

πŸ“Š Multi-Agent Response (Example)

{
  "run_id": "MAS-a7f3b2c9",
  "pipeline": "multi-agent-iterative-v2",
  "quality": {
    "overall": 82,
    "grade": "A",
    "scores": {"assertions": 8, "edge_cases": 7, "error_handling": 9, "isolation": 8, "docs": 6}
  },
  "syntax_validation": {"valid": true, "test_count": 18, "has_assertions": true},
  "behavior_coverage": {
    "total_behaviors": 18,
    "covered": 15,
    "uncovered": 3,
    "coverage_pct": 83.3
  },
  "mutation_testing": {
    "total_mutants": 12,
    "killed": 9,
    "survived": 3,
    "mutation_score": 75.0
  },
  "iterations_performed": 2,
  "processing_time_ms": 4200
}

πŸ“ Project Structure

testgenius-ai/
β”œβ”€β”€ backend/
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ app/
β”‚   β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ main.py
β”‚   β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ api/
β”‚   β”‚   β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ generate.py              # Standard generation endpoints
β”‚   β”‚   β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ multi_agent_routes.py     # 🧠 Multi-agent + analysis endpoints
β”‚   β”‚   β”‚   └── frameworks.py
β”‚   β”‚   └── services/
β”‚   β”‚       β”œβ”€β”€ llm_provider.py           # Universal LLM (any provider)
β”‚   β”‚       β”œβ”€β”€ test_generator.py         # Core generation logic
β”‚   β”‚       β”œβ”€β”€ prompt_builder.py         # Structured prompts
β”‚   β”‚       β”œβ”€β”€ multi_agent_engine.py     # 🧠 5-agent iterative pipeline
β”‚   β”‚       └── novelty_features.py       # Complexity, mutations, security
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ tests/                            # Pytest test suite
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ Dockerfile
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ requirements.txt
β”‚   └── .env.example
β”œβ”€β”€ frontend/
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ src/
β”‚   β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ App.tsx                       # Router + Error Boundary
β”‚   β”‚   └── pages/
β”‚   β”‚       β”œβ”€β”€ LandingPage.tsx           # Hero + features
β”‚   β”‚       β”œβ”€β”€ GeneratePage.tsx          # Multi-tab input + output
β”‚   β”‚       β”œβ”€β”€ AnalyzePage.tsx           # Deep code analysis
β”‚   β”‚       └── HistoryPage.tsx           # Previous generations
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ Dockerfile
β”‚   └── package.json
β”œβ”€β”€ docker-compose.yml
└── README.md

πŸ† Why This Wins the Hackathon

What Judges Look For What We Deliver
Creativity Multi-agent iterative refinement (no other team has this)
Technical depth AST parsing, real mutation execution, OWASP scanning, behavior mapping
AI integration Not "call GPT and return" β€” 5-agent pipeline with feedback loops
Real-world usability Paste code β†’ get production-ready tests in 3 seconds
Research backing Cites MuTAP (ISSTA'23), HITS (ASE'24), Code Agents (2406.12952)
Production quality FastAPI + Docker + Pydantic + universal LLM + pytest suite

What Makes This UNIQUE vs Every Other Submission:

"Other teams will call an LLM once and return whatever it outputs. We call it, VALIDATE the output, identify weaknesses using mutation analysis, then ITERATIVELY IMPROVE until quality reaches grade A β€” exactly like the MuTAP paper from ISSTA 2023. That's not a wrapper β€” that's a research-grade AI agent."


πŸ§ͺ Running Tests

cd backend
pip install -r requirements.txt
pytest tests/ -v

πŸ“„ License

MIT


TestGenius AI β€” Not just generating tests. Generating BETTER tests, iteratively.

Research-grade quality. Production-ready deployment. Hackathon-winning novelty.

Downloads last month
196

Papers for Muthukumarank/testgenius-ai