id
stringlengths 16
16
| comment_text
stringlengths 6
5k
| label
class label 2
classes |
|---|---|---|
13ab5d71001a8fc7 | The info in the article is still available in the history so anyone can merge any salavageable text at any time. Most of what's here belongs on Photoshop contest if anywhere, as people with that small subset of the overall topic in mind took over the article. Just because you opposed the consensus and don't want to do the merge yourself (hey, if you thought it was worth keeing then you should think it's worth moving to an article that stays, but your not doing so indicates that it's really not worth keeping in the first place) mean you can stand in the way of the clear consensus. | 0non
|
125d8d935c872969 | Thank you for explaining. I also did some looking around, and I suppose, given the referencing in the movie, command module is an appropriate term for the ship. | 0non
|
4331449ba59a8c9b | ~~It's okay, of course, for them to have their own separate article. Martyman, you are a FOOL. | 1tox
|
b7c2e34982161516 | "
What would be the advantage? The article itself stated: Jason is an average teenager at the time this article was written by himself. How is that encyclopedic? talk " | 0non
|
6e984841fb2525cf | User Page Revert!
No problem with the user page revert. I try to keep an eye out for those vandals who decide to step it up and start vandlizing user pages. I got you on my watch list so it will stick out! Keep up the great wikipediaing! | 0non
|
130e02ce5427f691 | , 12 April 2011 (UTC)
You are only now presenting sources for some of the information which you have inserted. In your last revision of the article, you did not cite the sentence about fundamentalism. Once again, the statement about public schools and ID materials was unsourced when you first added it, which is why I removed it. Upon further examination, I removed the statement again because the article never explictly stated that the Centre for Intelligent Design was responsible for the distribution of these intelligent design materials to public schools. It is actually very unlikely that this Centre for Intelligent design did so, in light of the fact that the government proclamation was issued in 2006, and this organization arose in 2010. Finally, believing in the historicity of Adam and Eve does not make one a fundamentalist. Many Christians reconcile the Genesis creation narrative with science (see the BioLogos Foundation for example, which advocates evolutionary creation). The entire Roman Catholic Church (1 billion people) teaches the historicity of Adam and Eve and that does not make them Young Earth Creationists or fundamentalists. I have filed a case on this dispute here and encourage your participation in it. I hope this helps. Thanks, Talk 08:23 | 0non
|
c1a0ad86c8143b09 | "
I have posted my comments indicating that I would be offline after them as a courtesy to others, who might wonder why I haven't replied to them quickly or might not be doing so at all. Not everyone checks user and talk pages to see courtesy postings about online status, etc. Sorry that you find my attempt to be courteous to other Wikipedians ""annoying"". In the past, you (and others) have not understand my comments (see the archives); as you (and others) seem to mistinterpret what I write and to read intentions in what I write that I do not have, I have suggested that you (and some of these others) not engage in these kinds of exchanges with me; I do not find them productive.
I am replying only out of courtesy and so that eventually this exchange can be archived by the automatic archiving bot.
There is no ""rule"" or ""guideline"" in Wikipedia that one must reply to every comment in one's user talk page or an article talk page. Replying is up to one's own discretion and time constraints (""schedule""). There is no requirement that editors must spend their time editing Wikipedia; WP:POL states the opposite; that one should not be criticized for how one chooses to spend one's own time. That is the prerogative of each of us. How we express ourselves, as long as it is courteous, is also up to each of us. If we want to take our time to criticize others, we need to keep in mind that we are doing so in public space and that our criticisms are being read by whoever logs on to that space.
From my own perspective, I find the comment posted above gratuitous and unnecessary. Irrespective of that comment, I will continue to post what I consider a courtesy to others since that is how I intend it to be. I do not intend to annoy anyone. The guidelines for how to address other users are in Wikipedia:Etiquette, WP:NPA, and other places linked in WP:POL. I try to follow these guidelines in what I post in Wikipedia. To assume otherwise is to violate WP:AGF. I am posting this reply in good faith as well.
To others who might be more interested than some in why I may not reply quickly or at all: I explain that in ""N.B."", but not everyone consults a user's talk page when commenting in article talk pages, and so some may not see that explanation in ""N.B."" above; therefore, I have mentioned that I would be offline in some of my recent comments in talk page article(s) that I have worked hard on in the past. I will be back offline after this reply and will not see what anyone posts here until I return to check the functioning of the achiving bot (I don't know when that will be). I have a massive amount of work to do offline over the next two weeks, which has been delayed in getting to me (thus I've been online occasionally in the past week from time to time), but I expect to be away from Wikipedia after this reply for indefinite and extended periods of time both during and after the next two weeks as well (on an extended ""wikibreak""; please see the template notice above). " | 0non
|
2b620c2511683aa3 | November 2011
This IP vandalized Inverse-square law although I don't know what good this will do considering all the warnings that this IP has received and yet they continue to vandalize. How about a 6 month ban? | 0non
|
e33e5272eeba283d | Vandalism
WHY DID YOU REVERT SOMEONES WORK ON MY USER PAGE?? | 0non
|
ca0136a0cfdd1628 | See you in two days.
Hahahaha. You protect that Jew fag Gabe, what a fucking pussy you are. We will be back in two days to drive that little bitch out for good! 199.30.247.201 | 1tox
|
d596d19337e0e348 | "
That's precisely what I'm talking about. It's enough for my name to appear on RfAr, no matter what the pretext, and there are crowds of disgruntled Ghirlaphobes complaining what I have done to them. This is going to be a mess. -трёп- " | 0non
|
73896b84dd23bee3 | i apologize for my attack ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................not! your a dick | 1tox
|
b9022813bdf238d5 | "== Discussing recombination ==
Recently I noticed that this article uses 'genetic recombination' to refer to recombination that occurs during in meiosis and brings about genetic diversity among organisms. This isn't necessarily correct: genetic recombination can also refer to non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or V(D)J recombination, neither of which, to my knowledge, occur during meiosis or produce heritable genetic diversity among organisms. To account for that, I think it would be helpful to replace instances of 'genetic recombination' with 'homologous recombination', the type of genetic recombination to which this article refers. What are others' thoughts on this? The only drawback I could see would be the slightly less reader-friendly word 'homologous'. This, however, seems clarified by the first sentence in the 'Sex and recombination' section to invoke the phrase: ""In the related process of genetic recombination, sexual organisms can also exchange DNA between two matching chromosomes."" If the inaccessibility of the word 'homologous' were in fact a drawback, I think it would be more than compensated for by the greater accuracy of the information being presented to the reader.
Yesterday I tried introducing this change, but was reverted. In the summary of that reversion, the editor noted: ""why be less general? homologous excludes translocations, duplications, fusions, etc."" I've offered my rationale for being specific just above, but was curious about the second sentence. If homologous recombination excludes translocations, duplications, fusions, etc., then is that somehow accounted for by other types of genetic recombination, like NHEJ or V(D)J recombanation? To my understanding, it is a failure of homologous recombination in meiosis that produces heritable chromosome translocations, fusions, and gene duplications.
I think you are correct, being more accurate is better since the sentence does refer specifically to matching chromosomes. I've reworded this to state In a related process called homologous recombination, sexual organisms exchange DNA between two matching chromosomes. I've added the idea of general recombination to the previous section, adding Mutations can involve large sections of DNA becoming duplicated, usually through genetic recombination.
Charles Darwin film 'too controversial for religious America'
""A British film about Charles Darwin has failed to find a US distributor because his theory of evolution is too controversial for American audiences, according to its producer.""
That's a laugh. Please don't try to make evolution look like it's a helpless victim being attacked by a bunch of religious nuts. The theory of evolution does have many loopholes, but America is not religious by any means; I'm shocked that an American producer turned down the film. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs)
Sorry, I just don't see how evolution can be a controversial topic - evolution is all around us, simple as that. People who tend to object to such basic fundamental facts of life tends not to understand the depth of the topic to the point of understanding it, but rather the shallow aspect to justify their lack of understanding. Not everyone is good at science so some people would tend to take the shallow route of critizing something if they don't understand. Example; I'm terrible at pre-calculus so I critize the aspect of pre-calculus to justify my understanding - see where I'm getting at?
Not relevant here. The Evolution article is not about Charles Darwin, the film is not about evolution, and there is an entirely separate page for the creation–evolution controversy. Please don't post sociological trivia on the Talk page of a biology article. (Also, evolutionary theory does not have ""loopholes."") - " | 0non
|
fcd29f7b6c89f01d | RfC against Everyking
I have filed an RfC against Everyking. Those concerned who have participated in this debate can certify it, while those who agree with my summary of the dispute may endorse it. If you've been involved in similar disputes (i.e. Autobiography promotion and publicity, La La (song)), feel free to add your own summary in the outside views section. You can endorse more than one summary, and still can certify the dispute. | Talk 19:07, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC) | 0non
|
d272e98fcb66a9af | "
Block
The latest block on this address is for forty-eight hours. If the address continues to be used for childish vandalism, then the next one will be a week, and the next a month. This won't affect genuine editors, who can create and use accounts. (Μελ Ετητης) " | 0non
|
82e0ba3bfb418ec2 | Correct. I have three options here: 1) use my personally identifiable username and risk jeopardizing my reputation both on Wikipedia and in real life, 2) create a second account and violate policy, or 3) post legitimate content from an anonymous IP address which (without a warrant) cannot be used to personally identify me.
On a side note, there is an increasing risk of having an account compromised when using a public terminal, network, or WiFi hotspot. 69.117.250.169 | 0non
|
1301acb655f3c3b6 | Its 100% right and certain that the benefits have been proposed, and self evident from any reference that have proposed them. There also does not exist any reliable refutation of any of the list of proposed benefits. The standard for inclusion as proposed benefits is (or should be) that they are debatable. There is no evidence that they are implausible, and the points are clearly argued. It is the most critical section of the entire article after all, and has been up on the page for about 1 year, for the scrutiny of the entire community. Its likely that any feeling you may have that the information is wrong is misguided, and if you expressed those feelings, you'd have an opportunity to learn from the community why those feelings may be in a weaker debating position than some of the proposed benefits. | 0non
|
554ddb61f1612587 | I invite you to comment on the policy talk page, in a more useful manner ;) | 0non
|
3320a02331dd67e1 | Thank you very much for your encouraging words. However, I made my dicsion after doing a thorough checking of Arbustoos's footprints on the Wiki. I notice that he has been systematically deleting information related to conservative Christians and conservative Christian organizations. He mutiliates where he cannot delete. And he adds information in such a clever manner that even what is right leads to humiliation. (An apology can be more humiliating than an insult). What is more, I notice that none, repeat NONE, has been able to stop his adventures. He is freely doing what he wants to and none of you has been able to stop him from his anarchy. Else, show me one example where any of you has stopped him in his tracks. Why is it that he has always got to be right??? His POVs are NPOVs while researched stuff by us is POV or simply garbage because there is no arbitrator between him and me. Just show me one example of arbitration in my case. I also notice that others who contributed to this article on Johnson C. Philip are not raising their voice. I know one of them (my junior who also did research on Philip). He told me he would never come back to Wiki, so disappointed was he also to see Arbustoo having his way and none of you coming to arbitration. We both have meaningful occupation in life and cannot fight against a person who can do anything without us having an arbitrator. Thanks for being nice to me. | 0non
|
c8cfce777c5aee85 | do we discredit all sources which have made errors, because if so, there's a certain frequently-cited columnist we will need to purge. And anyway, regardless of his errors reading Wikipedia output, the thrust of his claims had merit, and | 0non
|
66b2df6119ddd27e | What are you qualified in?
I see you issuing threats to contributors of Wikipedia - it seems you are some sort of administrator - may I respectfully enquire what qualifies you to monitor contributions, and how did you get this job. You and others like you at Wikipedia remain anonymous, no one seems to know exactly what fields you people are qualified in, yet you reign supreme. This is why I use Wikipedia as a second line of information because there is absolutely no information on its contributors.
Do you care to comment? | 0non
|
333d8115e2b183d0 | Evan Almighty
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. | 0non
|
5d9be5c0e387753c | "
Congrats, well deserved. Great stuff! (talk) " | 0non
|
5abd1acf92bfc4b3 | An individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust, and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in order to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the highest respect for the law
― Martin Luther King Jr. | 0non
|
c7163835366d7c64 | "
Thank you for experimenting with the page Japan on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Bayerischermann - " | 0non
|
0ba6075a7e51a89e | "
Lead
The lead has been substantially improved thanks to Saravask. However, the largely predominant image of Kolkata to the world is that of a city full of problems and sub-human conditions. Do you think at least one line highliting the problems of the city should be added to the lead? Like the slums/ poverty etc. I think so. However, I am finding it difficult to insert such a line appropriately. Maybe we can add it after the line that ends with ""...the city is now experiencing economic revival.""
Please help! Bye. " | 0non
|
73121e0b9ee0a47d | "
Recent edit
I find this edit wrong and edit summary inaccurate . The main text says nothing about a bloke called ""Eric Holder junior"" etc and this is another clear example of dumping content into the lede rather than trying to get the main body right and then construct a lede to reflect it. No wonder the lede is difficult to sort out. talk " | 0non
|
9249d906a8e5a8ad | . And then we would have to believe that the English people were so stupid they couldnt understand the Portuguese people, and didnt even know they were referring to a province or a city when using the term Canto.. which isnt that far-fetched of an idea | 1tox
|
904a5ce314abbc8e | "I'm not even sure the film says that Evolution is ""atheistic"", let alone Science. What it does is allows others (e.g., Richard Dawkins) to explain how, when they fully embraced evolution, it freed them of the perceived constraints they associated with theism. Does the film go beyond that and declare evolution to be atheistic? How?
" | 0non
|
2c7ba8cb9208334c | Just make sure there's a reliable source, which wouldn't' include Madeleine Cosman. ·:· ·:· | 0non
|
71fada8aa8f7e0e9 | "
Barnstar!
The Special Barnstar Thank you for commenting on the punitive nature of my block extention. The original block was probably useful in reminding me to guard my tongue. Although disagreeing with my record or methods is irksome personally (for you too probably), you still stood up for what was appropriate in this scenario. Thank you " | 0non
|
b483ccbb9ca1d08b | "
I know who I am, but who are you?
Funny you should tell me that I ""came out of nowhere and started reverting everyone."" I've checked your last 1,000 edits and not even one appears to be a constructive addition. Your edit history is pretty much a collection of reversions (sometimes just because the editor is blocked, in spite of the fact that some of those edits are valid and important for developing WP articles), filing SPI reports, ""teaching"" users about sticking to rules (as misinterpreted by yourself as they may be), talking down to less experienced users (and not being shy about threatening to seek admin help, even though this was your first message to the user, with whom you never even had the chance to engage in proper discussion) and maybe other actions that may have eluded my attention. As far as I can tell, you're here for the drama; I don't even think you really care about article quality. I've asked for a civil reply, but you preferred to keep trying to frame me behind my back for no wrongdoing whatsoever. If you want to engage in conversation, don't hesitate to do so. Have a glorious day. " | 0non
|
90923d7af94bdd80 | 3RR Violation
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. | 0non
|
8739eec5325dd156 | Take care to protect yourself, not pages. Watch it, Shitworth. Clayworth sounds good, but Shitworth is even more relevant ) | 0non
|
a6699bf063e04b28 | REDIRECT Talk:Hamilton (GRTC Pulse station) | 0non
|
204394fc26fdb52d | YOU REALLY NEED TO KILL YOURSELF. | 1tox
|
1eb545959b832ca9 | )
We're getting many attempts to use the passive voice in the article again. reversion used it, and edits continued to use it, only adding a preposition. 17:52, 7 February 2007 (UTC | 0non
|
21ddb7d368d078fa | If I may ask, what is the language used in old Tingboks? Some of them I am looking at date back to the 1600s. I cannot find any word translation charts or dictionaries anywhere for them? deanhostager@mediaone.net | 0non
|
cb629148e61292a8 | "
Trust is one thing, how people change is a different thing. What I mean is that we have to move on with our lives. I have completely stopped trolling now, and I don't understand why I would abuse the tools. Like I said above, I do not believe you are acting correctly when hunting me on ENWP, then I would never get those tools, even 3 years later. Just because you are the Swedish administrator who blocked me at SVWP, doesn't mean you have the rights to stalk me at ENWP, in order to prevent me from getting good things. I have my own, good adventure at ENWP, but it is annoying when seeing you destroy my adventure here at ENWP. Thank you for your time. /Mid (contributions) " | 0non
|
868436028445cfa9 | "
I think two names should be used only in the case of Spanish/Portuguese/Brazilian footballers and not in this fashion (""Juan Pablo/Juan Pedro"" or ""João Paulo/João Pedro"", both first names). Why ""Diego Alves"" where there is only one Alves in the Valencia team? There is this custom of naming several players by two names, I live in Portugal and here it is horrible, even mixing names with nicknames (for example Pedro Pauleta)!
I rest my case (especially after being called aggressive, I know it was directed at me), sorry for any inconvenience. Intro stays like it is presently. But one favour, if I can ask you: can the intro say ""known as Diego Alves"" at least? Just to be less of a confusion? Thank you, happy 2016 84.90.219.128 " | 0non
|
9df729be76373452 | Please check your email again, thx. Granted, I might have done the same thing as you, under similar circumstances. It is a complicated and and difficult situation, but doesn't appear | 0non
|
a00191b7e9898257 | "
The reason that I proposed to have the article at this title was to resolve a dispute concerning the inclusion of the term ""Irish holocaust"" in the lead. That was the ""package deal"" described above. Since that term has been removed, the ""package"" no longer exists, and I no longer support the article being at this title. pléigh " | 0non
|
3d23c6ebb6b714d8 | InfernoXV, you haven't told us what food you like. Have you actually been to China and eaten the regional food and discovered how they are prepared? If you have, then how many times have been there? Do you know how to cook? Eating frequently in restaurants, do you mean once a day, once a week, once a month or once a year? What do you call 'Cantonese' food, or northern food or southern food? Come on InfernoXV, no porky pie please. | 0non
|
5c2cb0ca34f4860c | " Untold Story"" appeared, in November of 2009, the authors' website stated: ""We are dilegently trying to prove the true family of Christopher Columbus by concrete scientific methods including DNA analyses that are ongoing at the University of Granada and other forensic means"". (It still says that!) The DNA evidence, at the time of the book's publication, four months ago, was inconclusive. Now, four months later, he says that he has ""proof to assert that the man who discovered America wasn't a peasant"". ""Assert"" is just a ""declaration"". He also says after 20 years of research he can ""claim"" his investigation as the truth. A ""claim"", itself, is not, at all, any type real proof. We're told above that Columbus's real name was Segismundo Henriques, son of Vladimir lll, of Poland. Yet, the website contradicts this, by telling us that his real name was Latin; ""Colonus"" and ""Colon"". Which is it? It's all much too uneven, contrived and catchpenny. This" | 0non
|
4dc992dad7cae0e4 | October 2014 (UTC)
Do you not understand that if an article is biased it will be edit warred because of the fact it is attacking and biased? Your protecting it for six months because people objected to its biased condition is excessive and against wiki open editing - I appreciate you returning to look at it and making a beneficial neutral edit. You went half way and Lisa has corrected it totally. 07:11, 9 | 0non
|
e3c213a2b7dce217 | . All of Wikipedia utilizes UTC as its clock and you should not be an exception. The way you have your signature formatted is a mess, anyway. There shouldn't be a or a full carriage return in it | 0non
|
0f20b38d1b7a60ea | "
Apparently not (
It seems that questioning the impartiality of people who have a personal stake in an outcome is to be labelled ""disgusting"", and the questioner is to be hounded. (talk) • (contribs) " | 0non
|
115c9170b81137c3 | Well, isn't antisemitism caused or fuelled by Jews hating the other races in the first place? 86.136.57.254 | 0non
|
44b56c970cf182df | User page
You have been told about user pages before, but you don't seem to understand. On Wikipedia, 'user page' are for editors of the encyclopaedia to tell us a bit about themselves. This is for people who are actually doing something to help build the free encyclopaedia that called Wikipedia. It is not a free profile page like you get at Facebook or MySpace. So far, all your edits have been to your user page. This does not give the impression that you are intending to do any useful work here, but instead it suggests that you are using Wikipedia as free web space or social media. | 0non
|
4a2d17ff843b76da | well, the end of Youngs has basically what we need. - Talk | 0non
|
7afc3a3fef62a114 | "
The David Blaikie piece mentions that Will Cloney, in an apparent attempt to ""soften the blow"", offered Rosie a chance to compete in the following year's race, regardless of her qualifications. It appears this was an unusual situation where the race organizer gave her ""special permission"", as it were. I have adjusted that section to reflect this." | 0non
|
9e21f8719e2ba8fe | Well I guess there is no arguing with you since you keep staying ignorent. You just go ahead and keep spreading your false and corrupt information. But us TRUE chaldeans will know the real truth. | 0non
|
be41f49826b0e783 | , please see Wikipedia:Civility. Don't call someone a troll just because you disagree with his or her beliefs. talk has every right to express his opinion on this subject. 24.251.33.38 | 0non
|
801f5fffd98f7ca9 | Template:uw-delete1 > | 0non
|
468bacab59abc9e6 | i LICKED OFF UR MUM SO SUK THAT AND GO FUCK UR SELF | 1tox
|
64ea5d5d23e8b91b | no reason to shunra..this is just anti-circ activist stuff. One time there was a activist group in america which claimed breast implants caused cancer. Turned out to be false. Plus there are many men who say they got more pleasure after being circumcised. The internet is a bad place for inforamtion cuz it always shows the bad. circlist.com go to this website it will let you know why you should be happy being circumcised. As for religious views Judaism-prohibits restoration Islam-prohibits restoration Christianity-its fine | 0non
|
435023b4499adb28 | |AMIGA]] German article; | 0non
|
8b6919a576b725b2 | Edits to Derby County F.C.
Why did you revert my edit to Derby County F.C.? Peter Shilton is not Derby County's most capped player, he won the majority of his caps elsewhere. The official DCFC website says it is Deon Burton. The other edits I made were to try to bring the page closer to the standards in the Wikipedia Football Project Club Manual of Style. These were useful edits. Cheers. | 0non
|
1c5ef6ce8885b18b | Roderick Usher's library, etc.
I have moved the section on Allusions and References to other works of Art (or whatever it was called) into a subsection of Analysis along with Usher's library. I have simplified it a bit and removed some unsourced speculation that a line of Poe's was inspired by a painting of Fuseli. I'm not convinced it's 100% the way to go, but I'm worried about how much undue weight this section is being given compared to more important encyclopedic aspects of the story. Feel free to disagree. I think more clean up is needed, and I will probably soon merge the article on The Mad Trist into this section as well. | 0non
|
b881ec78dd31b100 | So how long is this block gonna last newbs? I wanna EDIT again! | 0non
|
c797a5d9a527927c | Deletion of Sandbach Trivia
I belive that this is an important and intresting fact about Sandbach and people deserve to know about this and i can not see any justifications for you to delete this. | 0non
|
97258913b25550b0 | "==What is a ""real"" Clan?==
Your argument is interesting but despite popular belief there was little difference between most Lowland clans and Highland clans. The Lowlanders were involved in many clan battles and feuds too. The way Scotland was run you needed a clan to hold land and power. Of course some were more violent than others and some Lowland clans were not involved in any violent clan-like activitties at all but they are in the minority. It was centuries ago and we are all at peace now. " | 0non
|
f6cdf67fb5d07bc5 | I think you will find that it has not been deleted. And take a wild guess | 0non
|
c3e242d240e1d93a | OKAY IGNORE THAT,THAT WAS CRAP OK DON'T TRY THIS AT HOME YOU WILL GO TO FEDERAL PRISON | 1tox
|
3cfa357d0df3b414 | I can't believe I'm saying this...
but this article should be protected. There are so many vandals around this article, and there really is'nt much we need to add. | 0non
|
561514a91f7534b4 | not know even the abc of the Kamboj history. However, they want to be its self appointed judges and arbitrators. | 0non
|
d8008c0874c77718 | has presented you with the Donut of DOOM in the spirit of WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day a little more gothic.
Bon appetit!
Spread the smell of DOOM by adding .]]
. | 0non
|
9fc34b722b68ade5 | September 2006
Thank you for experimenting with the page Construction on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. | 0non
|
41c99116cb3b0064 | I absolutely agree that this is worth noting in the article, I just think that a fuller explanation (such as the above) is more useful to and tonally consistent with the rest of the article.
____ | 0non
|
c529d1439dd364fa | Refactoring
Do not refactor my comments again. You have been in dispute with me in the past, and perhaps you don't like me, but you have no business mucking about with what I have ot say. If you object to any of my comments feel free to bring them up at the appropriate noticeboard, but do not fuck with them again. Thanks. | 1tox
|
4b43a665df6b7969 | You're an imbecile. He was not a mercenary and he did NOT kill three children or fire his weapon at civilians. He probably didn't even have a gun. Quit smoking crack. It's BAD for you. | 1tox
|
6016be80ad8a9905 | I have looked at the map, and my personal estimate is in line with what the rebel commander said today that they control the southern and eastern arc of the city. And it is also in line with SOHR reports of where the fighting has eben going on. Look at the map . The rebels control Salahadin, Sikari, Saif al-Dawla, Fardous, Jamiliya, Qadi Askar, Sakhur, Hananu and Haidariya (south and east). Fighting is ongoing in the central part of the city in the Old City and Maysaloun. And the tanks have massed in New Aleppo and Hamdaniya (west). The northern part of the city hasn't been touched. | 0non
|
f4078e79b7d3c070 | "
Now let me explain my story. This all started because Musicpvm refused to honor the particular capitalization of a work of art, that is a La Toya Jackson album. Wikipedia naming guidelines do not apply to ""unique titles"", which can be interpreted as referring to works of art that are capitalized in a particular way for a reason. If an album cover clearly identifies the capitalization in a particular way, it should be displayed that way online. Gwernol, who is abusing his power as an administrator, decided to step in after I wrote a paragraph about Musicpvm in MY user page. If I'm not allowed to write my own opinions in my user page, then there is no point in a user page at all. Regardless, the whole thing started because Musicpvm falsely believes that the Wikipedia naming conventions apply to every article without exceptions, which is incorrect." | 0non
|
69856deb5e436965 | "
Talkback
Talk " | 0non
|
aca4b638bd87da0d | "
Always do (and happen to agree that article is a mess), but a messy FAR, off on the wrong foot, is not the way to go. (Talk) " | 0non
|
a01f1188c72ec520 | "=== Bringing Edits to the masses (The Latin Rascals) ===
Hall and Oates out of touch; the edit dub had to be one of the most
memorable tracks for me in the history of editing. The Latin
Rascals became superstars with rockstar status. Listening to their
edits; you never knew what was coming next; they were frenzied but
on time. They were the first editors I remember playing with speed
(slowing down voices/phrases) They seemed to be on everything from
radio(ktu,kiss fm and hot 103.5 and hot 97.1) club music to hip hop
(king kut; Run Dmc King of Rock) and pop. They produced many hits in
the club/freestyle genre; appeared on movie soundtracks
(disorderlies) and appeared on television (the music show second
generation with andy panda and tony moran) produced a hip hop
platinum album (the fat boys) became succesful artists (bach to the
future; arabian nights) and world reknowned remixers. Out of the
pack (omar santana; carlos berrios, chep nunez, etc...) these guys
did it all. Albert Cabrera appeared on Ktu solo and what he
accomplished with a pause button was nothing short of amazing. I'm
still in shock at some of the things I heard done; this coupled with
the ability to do megamix medleys seperated him from the bunch; when
he paired with tony moran things got crazier. The remixes they did
with Little Louie Vega on vinyl (information society's running)and
the exclusive mixes (called hotmixes specially made for bill lee the
on air personality who requested they do special versions)were
incredible; two of them appeared on cutting remixes; dont' break my
heart and let me be the one. The radio only version of Jody watley's
I'm lookin for a new love was insane!!!!!!!! So was the
cover girls show me and Noel's silent morning; these were radio only
remixes that never appeared on vinyl. I only heard Little Louie Vega
play them when he rocked hearthrob nightclub in nyc. If anyone has
access to them; I wish they'd post them up. These were definitley
staples in the art of multi editing and remixing. Eternal props
and much respect to The ultimate duo The Latin Rascals!!!!!!
David Anthony Mendez
> To this list I would like to add DJ's from the left coast
> (West Coast) who are always forgotten!
I would recommend trying to limit your list to some
(likely) forgotten names in strictly the tape cutting trade,
or very prominently focussing on cutting up masters,
because the ones we know, like Cabrera, Berrios etc.
well, everyone can mention those...
Also, not all DJ's do impressive cutting.
If we're gonna mention each and every person
who has cut tape once, where do you draw the line?
HZ wrote:
> I think the Latin Rascals did a lot of things before Nuance.
> By the time of Nuance feat. Vikki Love - ""Loveride""
> they were already working separate from Arthur Baker as well,
> and some of those Arthur Baker things
> must have been earlier. ""Loveride"" was 1984,
Remarkable is that this 12 inch does not even credit them
anywhere, even though everybody knew, if only from their
peculiar dark 'sound', that Cabrera and Moran had touched it ;-)
> Arthur Baker's discography at http://www.arthurbaker.net/ mentions
> ""Confusion"" by New Order in 1981 (which is weird, I'm pretty sure it
> was 1983), which has multiple edits.
Yes, but it might have been 1982 when Jellybean and Baker
tried out their first versions of 'Confusion' in the Funhouse club.
It usually took quite some time back then, for the world to hear
those tracks, or have them available as a release on vinyl.
Also interesting;
http://www.record-producers.com/roster/arthurbaker/biography.html
And I found:
[Jonathan Scott] ""In early 1984 I spoke to a member of New Orders sound crew
who mentioned a Confusion mix he 'had heard' that was basically an unreleased
Arthur Baker/Jellybean project mixing the basic elements of 'Confusion'
with parts of Freeze's 'IOU'. [...] I have been told that it surfaced
on a dub-plate (acetate) and was produced in a New York cutting house.""
Reportedly, a mix of Confusion/IOU used to be played a lot at the Hacienda around 1984/85.
Q: What are those strange colours on the sleeve?
A: It's a colour code Peter Saville same up with, see Power, Corruption and Lies for decoding information.
Q: What does the ""W-W-R-L"" in the beginning of the song mean?
A: Barney's lyrics are always up to the interpretation of the listener but one possible explaination
that has surfaced is that ""W-W-R-L"" | 0non
|
e772999b3d3a346b | "==Celtic Language?==
It says in the article that after St. Patrick was captured he began to learn ""the Celtic language."" It is commonly agreed among Irish historians that the Irish are not actually Celtic (e.g. the Irish learned the Celtic style of art from communication with the European mainland, etc.). So did they speak the Celt language? I defer to an expert on this one.
To be more precise, what the article means is that he learned ""a Goidelic language"" or ""the Old Irish language"". Patrick would have already spoken a Brythonic language and some Latin. Depending on exactly where he came from in Britain, he might have known a Goidelic language as well. Celtic languages and Insular Celtic languages explain how Goidelic and Brythonic may have been related to each other and to other Celtic languages. (Talk)
Are you kidding? Please identify your source in claiming that ""is commonly agreed among Irish historians that the Irish are not actually Celtic."" Recent research has revealed that the Celts did not displace pre-celtic peoples but Celts did come to Ireland and the predominant culture remained celtic until English colonization. Second, Gaeilge is a celtic language of the Q-celtic branch of the Celtic language family, thus the Irish of Patrick's day spoke a celtic language and it is assumed that Patrick learned said language. Ergo, he learned a celtic language (though, as noted above, he probably already spoke a P-celtic brythonic language prior to his enslavement.
I have seen broken dates for specific invasions of the British Isles from mainland europe during the collapse of the Roman empire, these not only include Picts, Scots, Irish, Angles and Saxons and more bizzarely English! I will have to dig the book out with dates.
St. Patrick: Fact and Fiction
I have removed 'was captured by Niall Noigiallach' as it is an obvious error. I will try to come back some time in the future and help with citation and new material.
What are the sources for the following statments?
1 - ""born Patricius Magonus Sucatus""
2 - "" seems to have studied at the monastery of Lérins on the Côte d'Azur from 412 to 415 ...He spent the next 15 years at Auxerre were he became a disciple of Saint Germanus of Auxerre and was ordained possibly about 417.""
3 - ""Saint Germanus consecrated Patrick bishop about 431, and sent him to Ireland to succeed Saint Palladius, the first bishop, who had died earlier that year. ""
4 - ""There was some contact with the pope. Patrick visited Rome in 442 and 444. ""
5 - ""Popular devotion to Patrick began in France, long before Sucat received the noble title of Patricius""
These and other statments seriously mar what is otherwise a fairly good and reasonably well written article. Also the chronology implicit in them is all over the place. The fact of the matter is that no one know for sure what the dates of Patrick's life are; those of 461 (arriving in Ireland) and 491 (death) are estimates arrived at only after decades of discussion. Will whoever rewrote this article please show the basis for including these statments. Thank you.
I've re-revised the article again in line with what I wrote above, for the simple reason that Pcassidy reverted back to his version again without citing sources for statments I take issue with. I dislike doing this unilaterally because it is against the spirit of wikipedia, but it seems I have to draw attention to this in some manner other than being polite. , 18:52 pm, 18th April 2005.
I did? Where? I just checked through my edits and all I can find is reverts of blatant vandalism and one weird edit (documented below). I also reverted ""confession"" -> ""confessio"" in the last two weeks or so - is this what you are referring to? - (talk) 18:11, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Hello Pete, glad to hear from you. The basic issues I have with the article as you wrote it - forgive me if I have mistaken you for another editor - are outlined above. I have no problem whatsoever with them being included in an article concerning Pat, so long as they are placed under some heading along the lines of ""Speculations about St. Patrick"". Because we know so very little about Patrick I really feel it is vital to seperate facts, speculation and hagiography. And - I mean no offense - much of what I have outlined above falls under the latter two categorys. Thank you for your time. , 22:08 | 0non
|
aaefa83a633d173a | THAKSIN IS A FXXCKING THIEF AND SHOULD BE SHOT ANF KILLED WITH ALL HIS FAMILY MEMBERS - ASS-HXXES ALL OF THEM!
Bold textREAD HEADING ENOUGH SAID... | 1tox
|
af51cba0bfb6ab60 | 00:00, 19 February 2011 | 0non
|
a5e8cd5fe2a5d7ca | and I asked that he be spared mob justice | 0non
|
f2965e4390c898e4 | You make valid points about court records, but I still think that the appearance of these records calls into question the accuracy of any of the information cited only from Eichenwald's article. Just as several people have suggested that information cited only from Counterpunch's article is questionable, the revelation of these court records equally, if not moreso, calls into question the accuracy of any information cited from the Eichenwald article. Without citing the Eichenwald court records, it still seems reasonable that without secondary citation (itself not referencing the Eichenwald article), any information from his article should be carefully reviewed and probably removed due to a fairly obvious conflict of interest. Once all the Eichenwald information is removed, it seems like Justin becomes truly irrelevant, and this article is fodder for deletion. | 0non
|
2f7964f00c4c2aaf | Hi there. Let me make my comment a little more personal. The internet is FULL of sites like yours (which you are definitely promoting by placing these links everywhere) and access to them is so simple. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and NOT a place to pop links in just because it's the same topic. When the above message says to add content instead of links, it is because external links are useless to a real encyclopedia. If possible, we try to link internally, and externally link only to resources for the articles. There are plenty of Ronaldinho links and sites with videos that display his skills; they should not be linked here. Please, please, stop plugging your site under the guise of adding valuable encyclopedic content. You may very well mean well, but this just isn't the place for this specific link. Thank you for understanding. - | 0non
|
8545ff3fca0cd59b | this is a poorly written article | 0non
|
32370641ae27c2f8 | External web links within main body of text removed | 0non
|
efb50ed330fa1937 | "
Harrassment
I'm not really interested in your further attempts at harrassment. You have made it clear that you will not discourse on the contention between us. Citing your interpretations of rules and nothing more is not constructive. I find it difficult for you to wonder why I haven't been particularly friendly to your continual removal of the comparison table. control " | 0non
|
013004b25c95612e | Anthony de Mello
Hi I need this page written: Anthony de Mello. It currently redirects to a priest. Do you have any suggestions on the dab title (cricketer)? | 0non
|
ce7f20160843b67a | ==
Your GA nomination of Action of 27 June 1950
The article Action of 27 June 1950 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Action of 27 June 1950 for things which need to be addressed. == | 0non
|
1e895baac9e89a5c | "
Thinly veiled criticism of regulators
""antitrust violations accordingly in today's political-cultural climate of mixed economies and ""public interest of society""."" sounds like thinly veiled attack on the regulators that have regulated Microsoft, and that if we had been in any other ""climate"" Microsoft would not have been punished - which is obviously rubbish (see Standard Oil). Can we word this more effectively? " | 0non
|
d2e95a819ee47a61 | "
Religious views and ministry-Involvement w/ Kenneth Copeland Ministries.
Very good page. Interesting. Mrs Court and her church are partners with Kenneth Copeland Ministries in Fort Worth, Texas. She is featured on page 26 of the Copeland's just issued ""2012 Covenant Partner Report."" There is a half-page picture of her on that page and a caption of her discussing her use of KCM teaching materials. This is important info for the above-referenced section. " | 0non
|
e5341ade4c3a3fcb | Phase two of the war on schumin
We are entering into phase 2 of the war on Schumin. The Wikipedia Reform Trust is resolved to force user:Schuminweb to recognise me in an edit summary. We are issuing amnesty's to all innocent parties in the hope that they may persuade user:Schuminweb to come around to a reasonable settlement. You can help us achieve this. All he has to do is recognise me in an edit summary. Easy, innit! 86.40.214.4 | 0non
|
856c75849cc5cdcd | Thanks
Thanks for the suggestion of the Lupin anti-vandal tool - after a few teething problems, it seems to be working now. | 0non
|
c03506c597f34085 | I will force you to eat dog poop.
It will be funny watching you gag and vomit with crap smeared all over your face. | 1tox
|
ef567d125a81b13b | "
Not gonna go around in circles with you on this. You're wrong, and I already took the time and explained and proved why. You're stubborn and biased, and I'm tired of it. The form ""Jehovah"" is long-established widely-used and not just be ""fringe"" groups, but you keep moving the goal post, when names are provided, you say ""they're just Christian theologians"". When I give an example of an Atheist who also uses the term etc, you find some fault or rationalize that away too, per your human nature not wanting to budge from your uptight position. The point (again) is that WP should reflect both the forms ""Yahweh"" and ""Jehovah"" since both are widely used in scholarly circles, in various contexts and books and works. I'm tired of the merry-go-round with you, on this. Something that you could have theoretically left alone, if you were half-way cool and reasonable. You're not. Also your stalking, hounding, and trolling of me is enough to get you reverted just for being disrespectful and creepy. I'm done. Bye. " | 0non
|
7f9e84610ff5f704 | ":The POINT, wiki, is that you ""invite others"" to see your point of view, but you refuse to see theirs. It's one sided. You want an example? This nice Buu thing. I point out to you that Super Buu w/ Gohan tried to unmake all of reality (which would have been the most drastic action in the history of the series), would have destroyed the planet had Vegetto not blocked one of his attacks, and was going to blow it up anyway to ""celebrate his omnipotence"" after absorbing Vegetto, and that this behavior is just as bad as Kid Buu's or Super Buu's (arguably worse since Super Buu has more intelligence and reasoning and still behaves this way). And what do you do? You claim noone's made a point against you.. You can't even dispute that evidence because it's clear as day, actions taken within the series that's easy to verify. And your evidence against? He gave Goku 5 seconds to fuse with Mr. Satan, and he let Goku and Vegeta launch attacks that he knew would't hurt him. Well I claim that we've given YOU a chance to see OUR point of view, and since you refuse to try and see this, and have had more than your two chances, we will continue to fight YOUR ignorance until justice is served.
" | 0non
|
4dc791c9ebf73e13 | "
Big Brother 7 images
A big thankyou for adding the housemate pictures to the article - it makes it look quite good now ) 9(talk) " | 0non
|
c65b8dc4a7a8a784 | Giant Snowman is an arsehole. An involved arsehole at that. HE IS HEAVILY INVOLVED. Take my talk page access away you idiot englishman. | 1tox
|
260b92db53c5ac8c | {{Unblock|Unblock or I'll kill you. | 1tox
|
11c56e503bb019a6 | "::Bear with me.
First of all, here's the sign on my street:
http://www.simplesignshop.com/images/150/slow_children_sign.jpg
What does it mean, ""resolve the IPs""? Does that mean find the IP of the web site/host? Or the user IP that added the link?
If it helps, the domaintools entry for each site lists the IP as well as other sites hosted at that IP. You have to pay to get the entire list, but they give you a ""teaser"" of 3 or 4. I noticed that there were about 10 or so domains per IP. So here's an example:
http://whois.domaintools.com/adriennejanic.net
Go to the server data section:
""IP Address: 207.218.202.112""
Click the little ""R"" button to the right:
http://www.domaintools.com/reverse-ip/?hostname=207.218.202.112
Anyway, thanks so very, very much! (talk)
" | 0non
|
8185f6e3ced4bf14 | Listen here fucker illythr, if I ever catch you on wikipedia again you'll have big problems at Siemens where you work. | 1tox
|
e8475f724ae5c0bf | No, these are not the latest version numbers; they signify which version the shown support is relevant for.
Minority browsers are relevant for showing broadness of support for HTML5, and killing the portability incentive/myth of using Flash.
Market share: I wouldn't believe such statistics, unless I could verify their classification of the user-agents in question. As a Konqueror user, I am so fed up with being incorrectly recognised as safari user.
Complex? Rather oversimplified, I woud call it, because you can't generally say «this browser supports that format». It depends on the codecs shipped with the operating system more than anything else, which this table fails to convey. | 0non
|