promptID
int32
112
146k
pairID
stringlengths
4
7
premise
stringlengths
8
856
premise_binary_parse
stringlengths
17
1.55k
premise_parse
stringlengths
35
2.77k
hypothesis
stringlengths
3
272
hypothesis_binary_parse
stringlengths
3
456
hypothesis_parse
stringlengths
20
784
genre
stringclasses
5 values
label
class label
3 classes
input
stringlengths
49
964
38,848
38848e
Although merger discussions continued among the four programs, in March 2000 two of the programs did not vote in favor of the merger plan, and therefore the plan moved forward with only two Legal Services Organization of Indiana, Inc. and Legal Services of Northwest Indiana, Inc.
( ( ( ( ( ( Although ( ( merger discussions ) ( ( ( continued ( among ( the ( four programs ) ) ) ) , ) ( in ( March 2000 ) ) ) ) ) ( ( two ( of ( the programs ) ) ) ( ( did not ) ( vote ( in ( favor ( of ( the ( merger plan ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) and ) ( therefore ( ( the plan ) ( ( ( moved forward ) ( with ( only ( two ( Legal ( Services Organization ) ) ) ) ) ) ( of ( ( Indiana ( , ( Inc. ( and ( Legal Services ) ) ) ) ) ( of ( ( ( Northwest Indiana ) , ) Inc. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (SBAR (IN Although) (S (NP (NN merger) (NNS discussions)) (VP (VBD continued) (PP (IN among) (NP (DT the) (CD four) (NNS programs))) (, ,) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP March) (CD 2000)))))) (NP (NP (CD two)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NNS programs)))) (VP (VBD did) (RB not) (VP (VB vote) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (NN favor)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN merger) (NN plan)))))))) (, ,) (CC and) (S (ADVP (RB therefore)) (NP (DT the) (NN plan)) (VP (VBD moved) (ADVP (RB forward)) (PP (IN with) (NP (RB only) (CD two) (NNP Legal) (NNP Services) (NNP Organization))) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNP Indiana) (, ,) (NNP Inc.) (CC and) (NNP Legal) (NNP Services)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNP Northwest) (NNP Indiana)) (, ,) (NP (NNP Inc.)))))))) (. .)))
Among the four programs, merger discussions continued and 2 of the programs did not vote in march 2000.
( ( Among ( the ( four programs ) ) ) ( , ( ( ( ( ( merger discussions ) continued ) and ) ( ( 2 ( of ( the programs ) ) ) ( ( did not ) ( vote ( in ( march 2000 ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN Among) (NP (DT the) (CD four) (NNS programs))) (, ,) (S (NP (NN merger) (NNS discussions)) (VP (VBD continued))) (CC and) (S (NP (NP (CD 2)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NNS programs)))) (VP (VBD did) (RB not) (VP (VB vote) (PP (IN in) (NP (NN march) (CD 2000)))))) (. .)))
government
0entailment
Premise: Although merger discussions continued among the four programs, in March 2000 two of the programs did not vote in favor of the merger plan, and therefore the plan moved forward with only two Legal Services Organization of Indiana, Inc. and Legal Services of Northwest Indiana, Inc. <sep> Hypothesis: Among the four programs, merger discussions continued and 2 of the programs did not vote in march 2000.
105,919
105919c
So what do we do? asked the Kal.
( ( So ( what ( ( ( do we ) do ) ? ) ) ) ( ( asked ( the Kal ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (SINV (SBARQ (RB So) (WHNP (WP what)) (SQ (VBP do) (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VB do))) (. ?)) (VP (VBD asked)) (NP (DT the) (NN Kal)) (. .)))
Bob asked what they should do.
( Bob ( ( asked ( what ( they ( should do ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Bob)) (VP (VBD asked) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (MD should) (VP (VB do)))))) (. .)))
fiction
2contradiction
Premise: So what do we do? asked the Kal. <sep> Hypothesis: Bob asked what they should do.
36,742
36742e
Leading commercial companies have achieved more predictable outcomes from their product development processes because they identify and control design and manufacturing risks early and manage them effectively.
( ( Leading ( commercial companies ) ) ( ( have ( ( achieved ( ( ( more predictable ) outcomes ) ( from ( their ( product ( development processes ) ) ) ) ) ) ( because ( they ( ( ( ( ( ( identify and ) control ) ( design ( and ( manufacturing risks ) ) ) ) early ) and ) ( ( manage them ) effectively ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (VBG Leading) (JJ commercial) (NNS companies)) (VP (VBP have) (VP (VBN achieved) (NP (NP (ADJP (RBR more) (JJ predictable)) (NNS outcomes)) (PP (IN from) (NP (PRP$ their) (NN product) (NN development) (NNS processes)))) (SBAR (IN because) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VP (VB identify) (CC and) (VB control) (NP (NN design) (CC and) (NN manufacturing) (NNS risks)) (ADVP (RB early))) (CC and) (VP (VB manage) (NP (PRP them)) (ADVP (RB effectively)))))))) (. .)))
Desirable outcomes are achieved in part by identifying design risks early.
( ( Desirable outcomes ) ( ( are ( ( achieved ( in part ) ) ( by ( ( identifying ( design risks ) ) early ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (JJ Desirable) (NNS outcomes)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBN achieved) (PP (IN in) (NP (NN part))) (PP (IN by) (S (VP (VBG identifying) (NP (NN design) (NNS risks)) (ADVP (RB early))))))) (. .)))
government
0entailment
Premise: Leading commercial companies have achieved more predictable outcomes from their product development processes because they identify and control design and manufacturing risks early and manage them effectively. <sep> Hypothesis: Desirable outcomes are achieved in part by identifying design risks early.
138,708
138708c
Or, to put it another way, in the sense of asking an entirely different Is it really a requirement of sophistication that a place provides good bookstores, movies, plays, museums, music, cuisines, and an opportunity for erotic and intellectual freedom?
( Or ( , ( ( to ( put ( ( ( it ( another way ) ) , ) ( in ( ( the sense ) ( of ( asking ( an ( entirely different ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( ( ( Is it ) really ) ( ( ( a requirement ) ( of sophistication ) ) ( that ( ( a place ) ( provides ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( good bookstores ) , ) movies ) , ) plays ) , ) museums ) , ) music ) , ) cuisines ) , ) and ) ( ( an opportunity ) ( for ( ( ( erotic and ) intellectual ) freedom ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ? ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (CC Or) (, ,) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB put) (NP (NP (NP (PRP it)) (NP (DT another) (NN way))) (, ,) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN sense)) (PP (IN of) (S (VP (VBG asking) (NP (DT an) (ADJP (RB entirely) (JJ different)))))))))))) (VP (VBZ Is) (NP (PRP it)) (ADVP (RB really)) (VP (NP (NP (DT a) (NN requirement)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN sophistication)))) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (DT a) (NN place)) (VP (VBZ provides) (NP (NP (JJ good) (NNS bookstores)) (, ,) (NP (NNS movies)) (, ,) (NP (NNS plays)) (, ,) (NP (NNS museums)) (, ,) (NP (NN music)) (, ,) (NP (NNS cuisines)) (, ,) (CC and) (NP (NP (DT an) (NN opportunity)) (PP (IN for) (NP (ADJP (JJ erotic) (CC and) (JJ intellectual)) (NN freedom)))))))))) (. ?)))
Sophistication requires that people not have intellectual freedom.
( Sophistication ( ( requires ( that ( people ( not ( have ( intellectual freedom ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Sophistication)) (VP (VBZ requires) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NNS people)) (RB not) (VP (VB have) (NP (JJ intellectual) (NN freedom)))))) (. .)))
slate
2contradiction
Premise: Or, to put it another way, in the sense of asking an entirely different Is it really a requirement of sophistication that a place provides good bookstores, movies, plays, museums, music, cuisines, and an opportunity for erotic and intellectual freedom? <sep> Hypothesis: Sophistication requires that people not have intellectual freedom.
66,912
66912e
In a way, the one-world battle is over.
( ( In ( a way ) ) ( , ( ( the ( one-world battle ) ) ( ( is over ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN In) (NP (DT a) (NN way))) (, ,) (NP (DT the) (JJ one-world) (NN battle)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (RP over))) (. .)))
There are no more one-word battles.
( There ( ( ( are ( no more ) ) ( one-word battles ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBP are) (ADVP (DT no) (RBR more)) (NP (JJ one-word) (NNS battles))) (. .)))
slate
0entailment
Premise: In a way, the one-world battle is over. <sep> Hypothesis: There are no more one-word battles.
71,863
71863e
Yes and perhaps it doesn't, snarled Whittington.
( ( ( ( Yes and ) perhaps ) ( it ( does n't ) ) ) ( , ( ( snarled Whittington ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (SINV (S (ADVP (ADVP (RB Yes)) (CC and) (ADVP (RB perhaps))) (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ does) (RB n't))) (, ,) (VP (VBD snarled)) (NP (NNP Whittington)) (. .)))
Whittington growled and said "Yes, and perhaps it doesn't,"
( Whittington ( ( growled and ) ( said ( `` ( Yes ( , ( ( and perhaps ) ( it ( ( ( does n't ) , ) '' ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Whittington)) (VP (VP (VBD growled)) (CC and) (VP (VBD said) (S (`` ``) (INTJ (UH Yes)) (, ,) (ADVP (CC and) (RB perhaps)) (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ does) (RB n't)) (, ,) ('' ''))))))
fiction
0entailment
Premise: Yes and perhaps it doesn't, snarled Whittington. <sep> Hypothesis: Whittington growled and said "Yes, and perhaps it doesn't,"
44,362
44362c
that sounds like it might be a really good idea
( that ( sounds ( like ( it ( might ( be ( a ( ( really good ) idea ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBZ sounds) (SBAR (IN like) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (MD might) (VP (VB be) (NP (DT a) (ADJP (RB really) (JJ good)) (NN idea))))))))))
That sounds like a terrible idea
( That ( sounds ( like ( a ( terrible idea ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT That)) (VP (VBZ sounds) (PP (IN like) (NP (DT a) (JJ terrible) (NN idea))))))
telephone
2contradiction
Premise: that sounds like it might be a really good idea <sep> Hypothesis: That sounds like a terrible idea
29,992
29992e
yeah the uh this this guy did too he ended up going to Leavenworth which is good i'm glad
( yeah ( ( the ( uh this ) ) ( ( this guy ) ( ( did too ) ( he ( ( ended up ) ( going ( to ( Leavenworth ( which ( is ( good ( i ( 'm glad ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (VP (VB yeah) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ uh) (DT this)) (SBAR (S (NP (DT this) (NN guy)) (VP (VBD did) (ADVP (RB too)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBD ended) (PRT (RP up)) (S (VP (VBG going) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (NNP Leavenworth)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT which)) (S (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (JJ good) (SBAR (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP 'm) (ADJP (JJ glad)))))))))))))))))))))))
There was a guy who went to Leavenworth.
( There ( ( was ( ( a guy ) ( who ( went ( to Leavenworth ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN guy)) (SBAR (WHNP (WP who)) (S (VP (VBD went) (PP (TO to) (NP (NNP Leavenworth)))))))) (. .)))
telephone
0entailment
Premise: yeah the uh this this guy did too he ended up going to Leavenworth which is good i'm glad <sep> Hypothesis: There was a guy who went to Leavenworth.
27,332
27332e
The point of David Frum's argument in the Gay Marriage dialogue seems to boil down to Look at how severely and for the worse marriage has changed in the last 30 years.
( ( ( The point ) ( of ( ( ( David ( Frum 's ) ) argument ) ( in ( the ( Gay ( Marriage dialogue ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( seems ( to ( ( boil down ) ( to ( Look ( at ( how ( ( ( ( severely and ) ( for ( the worse ) ) ) marriage ) ( has ( changed ( in ( the ( last ( 30 years ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN point)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NP (NNP David) (NNP Frum) (POS 's)) (NN argument)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NNP Gay) (NNP Marriage) (NN dialogue)))))) (VP (VBZ seems) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB boil) (PRT (RP down)) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB Look) (PP (IN at) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB how)) (S (NP (UCP (ADVP (RB severely)) (CC and) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT the) (JJR worse)))) (NN marriage)) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN changed) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (JJ last) (CD 30) (NNS years))))))))))))))) (. .)))
The point of David Frum's argument in the Gay Marriage dialogue seems to boil down to Look at how severely and for the worse marriage has changed in the last 30 years.
( ( ( The point ) ( of ( ( ( David ( Frum 's ) ) argument ) ( in ( the ( Gay ( Marriage dialogue ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( seems ( to ( ( boil down ) ( to ( Look ( at ( how ( ( ( ( severely and ) ( for ( the worse ) ) ) marriage ) ( has ( changed ( in ( the ( last ( 30 years ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN point)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NP (NNP David) (NNP Frum) (POS 's)) (NN argument)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NNP Gay) (NNP Marriage) (NN dialogue)))))) (VP (VBZ seems) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB boil) (PRT (RP down)) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB Look) (PP (IN at) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB how)) (S (NP (UCP (ADVP (RB severely)) (CC and) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT the) (JJR worse)))) (NN marriage)) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN changed) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (JJ last) (CD 30) (NNS years))))))))))))))) (. .)))
slate
0entailment
Premise: The point of David Frum's argument in the Gay Marriage dialogue seems to boil down to Look at how severely and for the worse marriage has changed in the last 30 years. <sep> Hypothesis: The point of David Frum's argument in the Gay Marriage dialogue seems to boil down to Look at how severely and for the worse marriage has changed in the last 30 years.
76,824
76824c
Studly guys work at the Pentagon.
( ( Studly guys ) ( ( work ( at ( the Pentagon ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (JJ Studly) (NNS guys)) (VP (VBP work) (PP (IN at) (NP (DT the) (NNP Pentagon)))) (. .)))
There are only effeminate goblins working at the Pentagon.
( There ( ( ( are only ) ( ( effeminate goblins ) ( working ( at ( the Pentagon ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBP are) (ADVP (RB only)) (NP (NP (JJ effeminate) (NNS goblins)) (VP (VBG working) (PP (IN at) (NP (DT the) (NNP Pentagon)))))) (. .)))
slate
2contradiction
Premise: Studly guys work at the Pentagon. <sep> Hypothesis: There are only effeminate goblins working at the Pentagon.
40,069
40069c
and there's The History of Yoakum County Texas there
( and ( there ( ( 's ( ( The History ) ( of ( Yoakum ( County Texas ) ) ) ) ) there ) ) )
(ROOT (PRN (CC and) (S (NP (EX there)) (VP (VBZ 's) (NP (NP (DT The) (NN History)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP Yoakum) (NNP County) (NNP Texas)))) (ADVP (RB there))))))
There's no book called The History of Yoacum County there.
( There ( ( 's ( ( no book ) ( ( called ( ( The History ) ( of ( Yoacum County ) ) ) ) there ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBZ 's) (NP (NP (DT no) (NN book)) (VP (VBN called) (NP (NP (DT The) (NN History)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP Yoacum) (NNP County)))) (ADVP (RB there))))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
Premise: and there's The History of Yoakum County Texas there <sep> Hypothesis: There's no book called The History of Yoacum County there.
132,944
132944c
okay i'll let you go ahead
( ( okay i ) ( 'll ( let ( you ( go ahead ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP okay) (NNP i)) (VP (MD 'll) (VP (VB let) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VB go) (ADVP (RB ahead))))))))
Okay, I will go ahead.
( Okay ( , ( I ( ( will ( go ahead ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (INTJ (UH Okay)) (, ,) (NP (PRP I)) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB go) (ADVP (RB ahead)))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
Premise: okay i'll let you go ahead <sep> Hypothesis: Okay, I will go ahead.
59,783
59783n
Suggestions on how to improve the current process were implemented and, as a result, LSC will be sending feedback letters to applicants that filed grant proposals for 2003 funding to begin a dialogue about the applicant's delivery system based on the grant application.
( ( ( ( ( ( Suggestions ( on ( how ( to ( improve ( the ( current process ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( were implemented ) ) and ) , ) ( ( as ( a result ) ) ( , ( LSC ( will ( be ( ( sending ( feedback letters ) ) ( to ( applicants ( that ( ( ( filed ( grant proposals ) ) ( for ( 2003 funding ) ) ) ( to ( ( begin ( ( a dialogue ) ( about ( ( the ( applicant 's ) ) ( delivery system ) ) ) ) ) ( based ( on ( the ( grant application ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (NP (NNS Suggestions)) (PP (IN on) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB how)) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB improve) (NP (DT the) (JJ current) (NN process)))))))) (VP (VBD were) (VP (VBN implemented)))) (CC and) (, ,) (S (PP (IN as) (NP (DT a) (NN result))) (, ,) (NP (NNP LSC)) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBG sending) (NP (NN feedback) (NNS letters)) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (NNS applicants)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBD filed) (NP (NN grant) (NNS proposals)) (PP (IN for) (NP (CD 2003) (NN funding))) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB begin) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN dialogue)) (PP (IN about) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN applicant) (POS 's)) (NN delivery) (NN system)))) (PP (VBN based) (PP (IN on) (NP (DT the) (NN grant) (NN application)))))))))))))))) (. .)))
There were over five hundred suggestions on how to improve the current process.
( There ( ( ( were ( over ( ( five hundred ) suggestions ) ) ) ( on ( how ( to ( improve ( the ( current process ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBD were) (PP (IN over) (NP (QP (CD five) (CD hundred)) (NNS suggestions))) (PP (IN on) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB how)) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB improve) (NP (DT the) (JJ current) (NN process)))))))) (. .)))
government
1neutral
Premise: Suggestions on how to improve the current process were implemented and, as a result, LSC will be sending feedback letters to applicants that filed grant proposals for 2003 funding to begin a dialogue about the applicant's delivery system based on the grant application. <sep> Hypothesis: There were over five hundred suggestions on how to improve the current process.
121,648
121648n
a) Spun the president's denial for months without bothering to check if it was true.
( ( a -RRB- ) ( ( ( Spun ( ( ( the ( president 's ) ) denial ) ( for months ) ) ) ( without ( bothering ( to ( check ( if ( it ( was true ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (LST (LS a) (-RRB- -RRB-)) (VP (VB Spun) (NP (NP (NP (DT the) (NN president) (POS 's)) (NN denial)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NNS months)))) (PP (IN without) (S (VP (VBG bothering) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB check) (SBAR (IN if) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (JJ true)))))))))))) (. .)))
The president made wrong statements.
( ( The president ) ( ( made ( wrong statements ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN president)) (VP (VBD made) (NP (JJ wrong) (NNS statements))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
Premise: a) Spun the president's denial for months without bothering to check if it was true. <sep> Hypothesis: The president made wrong statements.
59,740
59740e
The cruise ships crank up their flood lights, and the parties begin.
( ( ( ( ( ( The ( cruise ships ) ) ( ( crank up ) ( their ( flood lights ) ) ) ) , ) and ) ( ( the parties ) begin ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (DT The) (NN cruise) (NNS ships)) (VP (VB crank) (PRT (RP up)) (NP (PRP$ their) (NN flood) (NNS lights)))) (, ,) (CC and) (S (NP (DT the) (NNS parties)) (VP (VBP begin))) (. .)))
Cruise ships are host to well-lit parties.
( ( Cruise ships ) ( ( are ( host ( to ( well-lit parties ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Cruise) (NNS ships)) (VP (VBP are) (NP (NP (NN host)) (PP (TO to) (NP (JJ well-lit) (NNS parties))))) (. .)))
travel
0entailment
Premise: The cruise ships crank up their flood lights, and the parties begin. <sep> Hypothesis: Cruise ships are host to well-lit parties.
128,921
128921c
Although there may be several ways in which jobrelated mortality risks differ from air pollution-related mortality risks, the most important difference may be that job-related risks are incurred voluntarily, or generally assumed to be, whereas air pollution-related risks are incurred involuntarily.
( ( Although ( there ( may ( be ( ( several ways ) ( ( in which ) ( ( jobrelated ( mortality risks ) ) ( differ ( from ( air ( pollution-related ( mortality risks ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( the ( ( most important ) difference ) ) ( ( may ( be ( that ( ( job-related risks ) ( are ( ( ( ( ( incurred voluntarily ) , ) or ) generally ) ( ( ( assumed ( to be ) ) , ) ( whereas ( ( air ( pollution-related risks ) ) ( are ( incurred involuntarily ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (SBAR (IN Although) (S (NP (EX there)) (VP (MD may) (VP (VB be) (NP (NP (JJ several) (NNS ways)) (SBAR (WHPP (IN in) (WHNP (WDT which))) (S (NP (JJ jobrelated) (NN mortality) (NNS risks)) (VP (VBP differ) (PP (IN from) (NP (NN air) (JJ pollution-related) (NN mortality) (NNS risks))))))))))) (, ,) (NP (DT the) (ADJP (RBS most) (JJ important)) (NN difference)) (VP (MD may) (VP (VB be) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (JJ job-related) (NNS risks)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VP (VBN incurred) (ADVP (RB voluntarily))) (, ,) (CC or) (ADVP (RB generally)) (VP (VBN assumed) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be)))) (, ,) (SBAR (IN whereas) (S (NP (NN air) (JJ pollution-related) (NNS risks)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBN incurred) (ADVP (RB involuntarily))))))))))))) (. .)))
People have no control over job related risks.
( People ( ( have ( ( no control ) ( over ( job ( related risks ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNS People)) (VP (VBP have) (NP (NP (DT no) (NN control)) (PP (IN over) (NP (NN job) (VBN related) (NNS risks))))) (. .)))
government
2contradiction
Premise: Although there may be several ways in which jobrelated mortality risks differ from air pollution-related mortality risks, the most important difference may be that job-related risks are incurred voluntarily, or generally assumed to be, whereas air pollution-related risks are incurred involuntarily. <sep> Hypothesis: People have no control over job related risks.
44,724
44724e
And those are just the towns along Lake Como.
( And ( those ( ( ( are just ) ( ( the towns ) ( along ( Lake Como ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (CC And) (NP (DT those)) (VP (VBP are) (ADVP (RB just)) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS towns)) (PP (IN along) (NP (NNP Lake) (NNP Como))))) (. .)))
Those are the towns beside Lake Como.
( Those ( ( are ( ( the towns ) ( beside ( Lake Como ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT Those)) (VP (VBP are) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS towns)) (PP (IN beside) (NP (NNP Lake) (NNP Como))))) (. .)))
slate
0entailment
Premise: And those are just the towns along Lake Como. <sep> Hypothesis: Those are the towns beside Lake Como.
658
658e
unless you're eating like a baked potato or something
( unless ( you ( 're ( eating ( like ( ( ( a ( baked potato ) ) or ) something ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (SBAR (IN unless) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP 're) (VP (VBG eating) (PP (IN like) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ baked) (NN potato)) (CC or) (NP (NN something)))))))))
Unless you are eating a potato that has been cooked in the oven.
( ( Unless ( you ( are ( eating ( a potato ) ) ) ) ) ( that ( ( has ( been ( cooked ( in ( the oven ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (SBAR (IN Unless) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBG eating) (NP (DT a) (NN potato)))))) (NP (DT that)) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN been) (VP (VBN cooked) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NN oven)))))) (. .)))
telephone
0entailment
Premise: unless you're eating like a baked potato or something <sep> Hypothesis: Unless you are eating a potato that has been cooked in the oven.
142,638
142638e
But these vouchers can't be the kind conservatives prefer, which are sharply limited in value so as to forestall real integration while directing tenants toward private-sector slums.
( But ( ( these vouchers ) ( ( ( ca n't ) ( be ( ( ( ( the kind ) ( conservatives prefer ) ) , ) ( which ( ( are sharply ) ( ( limited ( in value ) ) ( so ( as ( to ( ( forestall ( real integration ) ) ( while ( ( directing tenants ) ( toward ( private-sector slums ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (CC But) (NP (DT these) (NNS vouchers)) (VP (MD ca) (RB n't) (VP (VB be) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN kind)) (SBAR (S (NP (NNS conservatives)) (VP (VBP prefer)))) (, ,) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT which)) (S (VP (VBP are) (ADVP (RB sharply)) (VP (VBN limited) (PP (IN in) (NP (NN value))) (ADVP (RB so) (RB as) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB forestall) (NP (JJ real) (NN integration)) (PP (IN while) (S (VP (VBG directing) (NP (NNS tenants)) (PP (IN toward) (NP (JJ private-sector) (NNS slums))))))))))))))))) (. .)))
These vouchers are not the type that conservatives tend to prefer.
( ( These vouchers ) ( ( ( ( are not ) ( the type ) ) ( that ( conservatives ( tend ( to prefer ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT These) (NNS vouchers)) (VP (VBP are) (RB not) (NP (DT the) (NN type)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NNS conservatives)) (VP (VBP tend) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB prefer)))))))) (. .)))
slate
0entailment
Premise: But these vouchers can't be the kind conservatives prefer, which are sharply limited in value so as to forestall real integration while directing tenants toward private-sector slums. <sep> Hypothesis: These vouchers are not the type that conservatives tend to prefer.
116,603
116603c
to just to see all these things that you can can see on television now and can read about that ten years ago we didn't have this kind of information i mean we didn't know
( to ( just ( to ( ( see ( all ( these things ) ) ) ( that ( you ( ( ( can ( can ( ( see ( on television ) ) now ) ) ) and ) ( can ( ( read about ) ( that ( ( ( ten years ) ago ) ( we ( ( did n't ) ( have ( ( ( this kind ) ( of information ) ) ( i ( mean ( we ( ( did n't ) know ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (X (X (TO to)) (S (ADVP (RB just)) (VP (TO to) (VP (VB see) (NP (PDT all) (DT these) (NNS things)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VP (MD can) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB see) (PP (IN on) (NP (NN television))) (ADVP (RB now))))) (CC and) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB read) (PRT (RP about)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (ADVP (NP (CD ten) (NNS years)) (RB ago)) (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBD did) (RB n't) (VP (VB have) (NP (NP (DT this) (NN kind)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN information))) (SBAR (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP mean) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBD did) (RB n't) (VP (VB know)))))))))))))))))))))))
Ten days ago we got a new TV.
( ( ( Ten days ) ago ) ( we ( ( got ( a ( new TV ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (ADVP (NP (CD Ten) (NNS days)) (RB ago)) (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBD got) (NP (DT a) (JJ new) (NN TV))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
Premise: to just to see all these things that you can can see on television now and can read about that ten years ago we didn't have this kind of information i mean we didn't know <sep> Hypothesis: Ten days ago we got a new TV.
51,191
51191c
On Wednesday, April 30, police in Pecos, 80 miles from Ft.
( On ( ( Wednesday ( , ( ( ( April 30 ) , ) police ) ) ) ( in ( ( Pecos , ) ( ( 80 miles ) ( from Ft. ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (PP (IN On) (NP (NP (NNP Wednesday) (, ,) (NNP April) (CD 30) (, ,) (CD police)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (NNP Pecos)) (, ,) (NP (NP (CD 80) (NNS miles)) (PP (IN from) (NP (NNP Ft.)))))))))
Pecos is 580 miles from the town.
( Pecos ( ( is ( ( 580 miles ) ( from ( the town ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Pecos)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (JJ 580) (NNS miles)) (PP (IN from) (NP (DT the) (NN town))))) (. .)))
slate
2contradiction
Premise: On Wednesday, April 30, police in Pecos, 80 miles from Ft. <sep> Hypothesis: Pecos is 580 miles from the town.
136,266
136266n
i can't think of her name i got it right on the tip of my tongue and can't say it Helen something
( i ( ( ca n't ) ( think ( of ( ( her name ) ( i ( ( ( got ( it ( right ( on ( ( the tip ) ( of ( my tongue ) ) ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( ( ca n't ) ( say ( it ( Helen something ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (MD ca) (RB n't) (VP (VB think) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (PRP$ her) (NN name)) (SBAR (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VP (VBD got) (S (NP (PRP it)) (ADJP (JJ right) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN tip)) (PP (IN of) (NP (PRP$ my) (NN tongue)))))))) (CC and) (VP (MD ca) (RB n't) (VP (VB say) (S (NP (PRP it)) (NP (NNP Helen) (NN something))))))))))))))
I'm forgetful when it comes to names.
( I ( ( 'm ( forgetful ( when ( it ( comes ( to names ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP 'm) (ADJP (JJ forgetful) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when)) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ comes) (PP (TO to) (NP (NNS names)))))))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
Premise: i can't think of her name i got it right on the tip of my tongue and can't say it Helen something <sep> Hypothesis: I'm forgetful when it comes to names.
26,074
26074c
More a part of Europe than ever before, Spain joined the European Community (now European Union) in 1986, giving further boost to a booming economy.
( ( More ( a part ) ) ( ( of Europe ) ( ( ( than ever ) before ) ( , ( Spain ( ( ( ( ( joined ( ( the ( European Community ) ) ( -LRB- ( now ( ( European Union ) -RRB- ) ) ) ) ) ( in 1986 ) ) , ) ( ( giving ( further boost ) ) ( to ( a ( booming economy ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (ADVP (RBR More) (NP (DT a) (NN part))) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP Europe))) (ADVP (IN than) (RB ever) (RB before)) (, ,) (NP (NNP Spain)) (VP (VBD joined) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP European) (NNP Community)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (ADVP (RB now)) (NP (NNP European) (NNP Union)) (-RRB- -RRB-))) (PP (IN in) (NP (CD 1986))) (, ,) (S (VP (VBG giving) (NP (JJ further) (NN boost)) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT a) (JJ booming) (NN economy)))))) (. .)))
Spain still refuses to join the European Union.
( Spain ( still ( ( refuses ( to ( join ( the ( European Union ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Spain)) (ADVP (RB still)) (VP (VBZ refuses) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB join) (NP (DT the) (NNP European) (NNP Union)))))) (. .)))
travel
2contradiction
Premise: More a part of Europe than ever before, Spain joined the European Community (now European Union) in 1986, giving further boost to a booming economy. <sep> Hypothesis: Spain still refuses to join the European Union.
48,619
48619c
Exhibit 8 provides a summary of the base WTP values used to generate estimates of the economic value of avoided health effects for this analysis, adjusted to 1999 dollars, and a brief description of the basis for these values.
( ( Exhibit 8 ) ( ( provides ( ( a summary ) ( of ( ( the ( base ( WTP values ) ) ) ( used ( to ( ( generate ( estimates ( of ( ( the ( economic value ) ) ( of ( avoided ( health effects ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( for ( ( ( ( ( ( this analysis ) , ) ( adjusted ( to ( 1999 dollars ) ) ) ) , ) and ) ( ( a ( brief description ) ) ( of ( ( the basis ) ( for ( these values ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NN Exhibit) (CD 8)) (VP (VBZ provides) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN summary)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ base) (NNP WTP) (NNS values)) (VP (VBN used) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB generate) (NP (NP (NNS estimates)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ economic) (NN value)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ avoided) (NN health) (NNS effects)))))) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (NP (DT this) (NN analysis)) (, ,) (VP (VBN adjusted) (PP (TO to) (NP (CD 1999) (NNS dollars)))) (, ,)) (CC and) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ brief) (NN description)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN basis)) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT these) (NNS values)))))))))))))))) (. .)))
The values used to generate the estimates are not available.
( ( ( The values ) ( used ( to ( generate ( the estimates ) ) ) ) ) ( ( ( are not ) available ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NNS values)) (VP (VBN used) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB generate) (NP (DT the) (NNS estimates))))))) (VP (VBP are) (RB not) (ADJP (JJ available))) (. .)))
government
2contradiction
Premise: Exhibit 8 provides a summary of the base WTP values used to generate estimates of the economic value of avoided health effects for this analysis, adjusted to 1999 dollars, and a brief description of the basis for these values. <sep> Hypothesis: The values used to generate the estimates are not available.
101,149
101149e
Maybe Kubrick would have made nothing but masterpieces if he'd put big Greek or Venetian masks on all his actors.
( Maybe ( Kubrick ( ( would ( have ( ( made ( nothing ( but masterpieces ) ) ) ( if ( he ( 'd ( ( put ( big ( Greek ( or ( Venetian masks ) ) ) ) ) ( on ( all ( his actors ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (ADVP (RB Maybe)) (NP (NNP Kubrick)) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB have) (VP (VBN made) (NP (NP (NN nothing)) (PP (CC but) (NP (NNS masterpieces)))) (SBAR (IN if) (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (MD 'd) (VP (VB put) (NP (JJ big) (JJ Greek) (CC or) (JJ Venetian) (NNS masks)) (PP (IN on) (NP (PDT all) (PRP$ his) (NNS actors)))))))))) (. .)))
Kubrick made some masterpieces.
( Kubrick ( ( made ( some masterpieces ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Kubrick)) (VP (VBD made) (NP (DT some) (NNS masterpieces))) (. .)))
slate
0entailment
Premise: Maybe Kubrick would have made nothing but masterpieces if he'd put big Greek or Venetian masks on all his actors. <sep> Hypothesis: Kubrick made some masterpieces.
55,466
55466e
work and our congressionally driven examinations of how well agencies are pursuing
( ( work and ) ( ( our ( ( congressionally driven ) examinations ) ) ( of ( ( how well ) ( agencies ( are pursuing ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NN work)) (CC and) (NP (NP (PRP$ our) (ADJP (RB congressionally) (JJ driven)) (NNS examinations)) (PP (IN of) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB how) (RB well)) (S (NP (NNS agencies)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBG pursuing))))))))))
Congress sometimes wants the progress of agencies examined by us.
( Congress ( sometimes ( ( wants ( ( the progress ) ( of ( agencies ( examined ( by us ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Congress)) (ADVP (RB sometimes)) (VP (VBZ wants) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN progress)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNS agencies)) (VP (VBN examined) (PP (IN by) (NP (PRP us)))))))) (. .)))
government
0entailment
Premise: work and our congressionally driven examinations of how well agencies are pursuing <sep> Hypothesis: Congress sometimes wants the progress of agencies examined by us.
116,828
116828e
The Hebrew University and the Hadassah Medical Centre were built on Mount Scopus beginning in 1925 and became the pride of the Jewish community in Palestine under British control.
( ( ( ( The ( Hebrew University ) ) and ) ( the ( Hadassah ( Medical Centre ) ) ) ) ( ( ( ( were ( ( built ( on ( Mount Scopus ) ) ) ( beginning ( in 1925 ) ) ) ) and ) ( ( became ( ( the pride ) ( of ( ( the ( Jewish community ) ) ( in Palestine ) ) ) ) ) ( under ( British control ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NNP Hebrew) (NNP University)) (CC and) (NP (DT the) (NNP Hadassah) (NNP Medical) (NNP Centre))) (VP (VP (VBD were) (VP (VBN built) (PP (IN on) (NP (NNP Mount) (NNPS Scopus))) (PP (VBG beginning) (PP (IN in) (NP (CD 1925)))))) (CC and) (VP (VBD became) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN pride)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ Jewish) (NN community)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Palestine)))))) (PP (IN under) (NP (JJ British) (NN control))))) (. .)))
The Hadassah Medical Centre was built on Mount Scopus in 1925.
( ( The ( Hadassah ( Medical Centre ) ) ) ( ( was ( built ( on ( ( Mount Scopus ) ( in 1925 ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNP Hadassah) (NNP Medical) (NNP Centre)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN built) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (NNP Mount) (NNP Scopus)) (PP (IN in) (NP (CD 1925))))))) (. .)))
travel
0entailment
Premise: The Hebrew University and the Hadassah Medical Centre were built on Mount Scopus beginning in 1925 and became the pride of the Jewish community in Palestine under British control. <sep> Hypothesis: The Hadassah Medical Centre was built on Mount Scopus in 1925.
117,958
117958n
Jon could not imagine what they had faced in their own tunnel.
( Jon ( ( ( could not ) ( imagine ( what ( they ( had ( faced ( in ( their ( own tunnel ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Jon)) (VP (MD could) (RB not) (VP (VB imagine) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBD had) (VP (VBN faced) (PP (IN in) (NP (PRP$ their) (JJ own) (NN tunnel))))))))) (. .)))
Jon couldn't figure out what was down the tunnel, but he had an idea.
( ( ( ( ( Jon ( ( could n't ) ( ( figure out ) ( what ( was ( down ( the tunnel ) ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) but ) ( he ( had ( an idea ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (NNP Jon)) (VP (MD could) (RB n't) (VP (VB figure) (PRT (RP out)) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (VP (VBD was) (ADVP (RB down) (NP (DT the) (NN tunnel))))))))) (, ,) (CC but) (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBD had) (NP (DT an) (NN idea)))) (. .)))
fiction
1neutral
Premise: Jon could not imagine what they had faced in their own tunnel. <sep> Hypothesis: Jon couldn't figure out what was down the tunnel, but he had an idea.
38,904
38904c
Today, the action is in the food markets and boutiques on the Grand Canal's west bank.
( Today ( , ( ( the action ) ( ( is ( in ( ( the ( food ( ( markets and ) boutiques ) ) ) ( on ( ( the ( Grand ( Canal 's ) ) ) ( west bank ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NN Today)) (, ,) (NP (DT the) (NN action)) (VP (VBZ is) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN food) (NNS markets) (CC and) (NNS boutiques)) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP Grand) (NNP Canal) (POS 's)) (JJ west) (NN bank)))))) (. .)))
The food markets are all on the canal's east bank.
( ( The ( food markets ) ) ( ( ( are all ) ( on ( ( the ( canal 's ) ) ( east bank ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN food) (NNS markets)) (VP (VBP are) (RB all) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN canal) (POS 's)) (JJ east) (NN bank)))) (. .)))
travel
2contradiction
Premise: Today, the action is in the food markets and boutiques on the Grand Canal's west bank. <sep> Hypothesis: The food markets are all on the canal's east bank.
5,095
5095n
and you know it's it's really annoying when the i asked the defense attorney later why he didn't bring up all this other trouble the guy had been in he said that that was barred uh by the court
( and ( you ( know ( it ( 's ( it ( ( 's ( really annoying ) ) ( when ( ( the i ) ( ( ( asked ( the ( defense attorney ) ) ) later ) ( why ( he ( ( did n't ) ( ( bring up ) ( ( all ( this ( other trouble ) ) ) ( ( the guy ) ( had ( been ( in ( he ( said ( that ( that ( was ( ( barred uh ) ( by ( the court ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (PRN (CC and) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (ADJP (RB really) (JJ annoying)) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when)) (S (NP (DT the) (FW i)) (VP (VBD asked) (NP (DT the) (NN defense) (NN attorney)) (ADVP (RB later)) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB why)) (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBD did) (RB n't) (VP (VB bring) (PRT (RP up)) (NP (NP (PDT all) (DT this) (JJ other) (NN trouble)) (SBAR (S (NP (DT the) (NN guy)) (VP (VBD had) (VP (VBN been) (SBAR (IN in) (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBD said) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (DT that)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN barred) (ADVP (RB uh)) (PP (IN by) (NP (DT the) (NN court))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
The man standing trial had many previous arrests.
( ( The ( man ( standing trial ) ) ) ( ( had ( many ( previous arrests ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN man) (NN standing) (NN trial)) (VP (VBD had) (NP (JJ many) (JJ previous) (NNS arrests))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
Premise: and you know it's it's really annoying when the i asked the defense attorney later why he didn't bring up all this other trouble the guy had been in he said that that was barred uh by the court <sep> Hypothesis: The man standing trial had many previous arrests.
33,011
33011c
boilermaker labor per year.
( ( ( boilermaker labor ) ( per year ) ) . )
(ROOT (NP (NP (NN boilermaker) (NN labor)) (PP (IN per) (NP (NN year))) (. .)))
boilermaker labor per week.
( ( ( boilermaker labor ) ( per week ) ) . )
(ROOT (NP (NP (NN boilermaker) (NN labor)) (PP (IN per) (NP (NN week))) (. .)))
government
2contradiction
Premise: boilermaker labor per year. <sep> Hypothesis: boilermaker labor per week.
12,120
12120e
Today it houses a small museum?­.
( Today ( it ( ( houses ( a ( small museum? ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NN Today)) (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ houses) (NP (DT a) (JJ small) (NN museum?))) (. .)))
It contains a small museum.
( It ( ( contains ( a ( small museum ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (VBZ contains) (NP (DT a) (JJ small) (NN museum))) (. .)))
travel
0entailment
Premise: Today it houses a small museum?­. <sep> Hypothesis: It contains a small museum.
16,254
16254e
you know if somebody's hungry
( you ( know ( if ( somebody ( 's hungry ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (SBAR (IN if) (S (NP (NN somebody)) (VP (VBZ 's) (ADJP (JJ hungry))))))))
if a person wants to eat you understand that
( if ( ( a person ) ( wants ( to ( eat ( you ( understand that ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (SBAR (IN if) (S (NP (DT a) (NN person)) (VP (VBZ wants) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB eat) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VB understand) (NP (DT that)))))))))))
telephone
0entailment
Premise: you know if somebody's hungry <sep> Hypothesis: if a person wants to eat you understand that
21,592
21592n
And (as Tom wonders in the book's opening line) are we all characters in one of God's dreams?
( And ( ( -LRB- ( ( as ( ( Tom wonders ) ( in ( ( the ( book 's ) ) ( opening line ) ) ) ) ) -RRB- ) ) ( ( are ( we ( ( ( all characters ) ( in one ) ) ( of ( ( God 's ) dreams ) ) ) ) ) ? ) ) )
(ROOT (S (CC And) (NP (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (PP (IN as) (NP (NP (NNP Tom) (NNS wonders)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN book) (POS 's)) (NN opening) (NN line))))) (-RRB- -RRB-))) (VP (VBP are) (NP (PRP we) (NP (NP (DT all) (NNS characters)) (PP (IN in) (NP (CD one))) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNP God) (POS 's)) (NNS dreams)))))) (. ?)))
Tom's last thought, reflected in the opening line of the book, was that we could be part of God's dream.
( ( ( ( ( ( Tom 's ) ( last thought ) ) , ) ( reflected ( in ( ( the ( opening line ) ) ( of ( the book ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) ( ( was ( that ( we ( could ( be ( part ( of ( ( God 's ) dream ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NP (NNP Tom) (POS 's)) (JJ last) (NN thought)) (, ,) (VP (VBN reflected) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT the) (VBG opening) (NN line)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN book)))))) (, ,)) (VP (VBD was) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (MD could) (VP (VB be) (NP (NP (NN part)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNP God) (POS 's)) (NN dream))))))))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
Premise: And (as Tom wonders in the book's opening line) are we all characters in one of God's dreams? <sep> Hypothesis: Tom's last thought, reflected in the opening line of the book, was that we could be part of God's dream.
88,070
88070c
i mean they are but i don't label it as such
( i ( mean ( they ( ( are but ) ( i ( ( do n't ) ( label ( it ( as such ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP mean) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VP (VBP are)) (CC but) (VP (ADVP (RB i)) (VBP do) (RB n't) (VP (VB label) (S (NP (PRP it)) (ADJP (RB as) (JJ such)))))))))))
I label them how I want.
( I ( ( ( label them ) ( how ( I want ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP label) (NP (PRP them)) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB how)) (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP want))))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
Premise: i mean they are but i don't label it as such <sep> Hypothesis: I label them how I want.
112,182
112182c
and i don't know what the solution is
( and ( i ( ( do n't ) ( know ( what ( ( the solution ) is ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (FRAG (CC and) (NP (NP (FW i)) (SBAR (S (VP (VBP do) (RB n't) (VP (VB know) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (NP (DT the) (NN solution)) (VP (VBZ is)))))))))))
I have a perfect idea of what to do.
( I ( ( have ( ( a ( perfect idea ) ) ( of ( what ( to do ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP have) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ perfect) (NN idea)) (PP (IN of) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB do)))))))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
Premise: and i don't know what the solution is <sep> Hypothesis: I have a perfect idea of what to do.
135,730
135730e
was this uh done not by TI people was it
( was ( ( this uh ) ( done ( not ( by ( TI ( people ( was it ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (SINV (VBD was) (NP (NP (DT this) (NN uh)) (VP (VBN done) (PP (RB not) (IN by) (NP (NP (NNP TI)) (SBAR (S (NP (NNS people)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (PRP it)))))))))))
It wasn't done by TI people.
( It ( ( ( was n't ) ( done ( by ( TI people ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (VBD was) (RB n't) (VP (VBN done) (PP (IN by) (NP (NNP TI) (NNS people))))) (. .)))
telephone
0entailment
Premise: was this uh done not by TI people was it <sep> Hypothesis: It wasn't done by TI people.
25,512
25512n
Over the past 27 years, LSC has helped millions of low-income citizens solve important, sometimes life-threatening, civil legal problems.
( ( Over ( the ( past ( 27 years ) ) ) ) ( , ( LSC ( ( has ( helped ( ( millions ( of ( low-income citizens ) ) ) ( solve ( ( important ( , ( sometimes ( life-threatening , ) ) ) ) ( civil ( legal problems ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN Over) (NP (DT the) (JJ past) (CD 27) (NNS years))) (, ,) (NP (NNP LSC)) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN helped) (S (NP (NP (NNS millions)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ low-income) (NNS citizens)))) (VP (VB solve) (NP (ADJP (JJ important) (, ,) (RB sometimes) (JJ life-threatening) (, ,)) (JJ civil) (JJ legal) (NNS problems)))))) (. .)))
Over the past 27 years, LSC was funded by the government.
( ( Over ( the ( past ( 27 years ) ) ) ) ( , ( LSC ( ( was ( funded ( by ( the government ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN Over) (NP (DT the) (JJ past) (CD 27) (NNS years))) (, ,) (NP (NNP LSC)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN funded) (PP (IN by) (NP (DT the) (NN government))))) (. .)))
government
1neutral
Premise: Over the past 27 years, LSC has helped millions of low-income citizens solve important, sometimes life-threatening, civil legal problems. <sep> Hypothesis: Over the past 27 years, LSC was funded by the government.
47,591
47591e
yeah yeah well we didn't have much we had some good ice but not a lot thank goodness not
( yeah ( yeah ( well ( we ( ( did n't ) ( have ( much ( we ( had ( ( ( some ( good ice ) ) ( but not ) ) ( a ( ( lot thank ) ( goodness not ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (VP (VB yeah) (S (ADVP (RB yeah)) (ADVP (RB well)) (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBD did) (RB n't) (VP (VB have) (NP (NP (RB much)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBD had) (NP (NP (DT some) (JJ good) (NN ice)) (CONJP (CC but) (RB not)) (NP (DT a) (ADJP (RB lot) (JJ thank)) (NN goodness) (RB not)))))))))))))
We didn't have too much ice, but there was some.
( ( ( ( ( We ( ( did n't ) ( have ( ( too much ) ice ) ) ) ) , ) but ) ( there ( was some ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (PRP We)) (VP (VBD did) (RB n't) (VP (VB have) (NP (ADJP (RB too) (JJ much)) (NN ice))))) (, ,) (CC but) (S (NP (EX there)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (DT some)))) (. .)))
telephone
0entailment
Premise: yeah yeah well we didn't have much we had some good ice but not a lot thank goodness not <sep> Hypothesis: We didn't have too much ice, but there was some.
100,746
100746c
An idiosyncrasy of genius.
( ( ( An idiosyncrasy ) ( of genius ) ) . )
(ROOT (NP (NP (DT An) (NN idiosyncrasy)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN genius))) (. .)))
An idiosyncrasy of being dull.
( ( ( An idiosyncrasy ) ( of ( being dull ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (NP (NP (DT An) (NN idiosyncrasy)) (PP (IN of) (S (VP (VBG being) (ADJP (JJ dull))))) (. .)))
fiction
2contradiction
Premise: An idiosyncrasy of genius. <sep> Hypothesis: An idiosyncrasy of being dull.
92,336
92336c
master charge
( master charge )
(ROOT (NP (NN master) (NN charge)))
No one is in control.
( ( No one ) ( ( is ( in control ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT No) (NN one)) (VP (VBZ is) (PP (IN in) (NP (NN control)))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
Premise: master charge <sep> Hypothesis: No one is in control.
73,315
73315c
Clinton brought it to the galley to show the flight attendants.
( Clinton ( ( ( ( brought it ) ( to ( the galley ) ) ) ( to ( show ( the ( flight attendants ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Clinton)) (VP (VBD brought) (NP (PRP it)) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (NN galley))) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB show) (NP (DT the) (NN flight) (NNS attendants)))))) (. .)))
Clinton has never flown on a plane.
( Clinton ( ( ( has never ) ( flown ( on ( a plane ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Clinton)) (VP (VBZ has) (ADVP (RB never)) (VP (VBN flown) (PP (IN on) (NP (DT a) (NN plane))))) (. .)))
slate
2contradiction
Premise: Clinton brought it to the galley to show the flight attendants. <sep> Hypothesis: Clinton has never flown on a plane.
104,246
104246c
The act requires that auditors for each of the 24 departments and agencies named in the CFO Act report, as part of their annual audits of the agenciesa financial statements, whether the agenciesa financial management systems comply substantially with federal financial management systems requirements, applicable federal accounting standards, and SGL at the transaction level.
( ( The act ) ( ( requires ( that ( ( auditors ( for ( each ( of ( the ( ( ( 24 departments ) and ) agencies ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( ( ( ( named ( in ( the ( CFO ( Act report ) ) ) ) ) , ) ( as ( part ( of ( ( their ( annual audits ) ) ( of ( the ( agenciesa ( financial statements ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) ( whether ( ( the ( agenciesa ( financial ( management systems ) ) ) ) ( ( comply substantially ) ( with ( ( ( ( ( ( federal ( financial ( management ( systems requirements ) ) ) ) , ) ( applicable ( federal ( accounting standards ) ) ) ) , ) and ) ( SGL ( at ( the ( transaction level ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN act)) (VP (VBZ requires) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NP (NNS auditors)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (DT each)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NX (NX (CD 24) (NNS departments)) (CC and) (NX (NNS agencies)))))))) (VP (VBD named) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NNP CFO) (NNP Act) (NN report))) (, ,) (PP (IN as) (NP (NP (NN part)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (PRP$ their) (JJ annual) (NN audits)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (JJ agenciesa) (JJ financial) (NNS statements))))))) (, ,) (SBAR (IN whether) (S (NP (DT the) (JJ agenciesa) (JJ financial) (NN management) (NNS systems)) (VP (VB comply) (ADVP (RB substantially)) (PP (IN with) (NP (NP (JJ federal) (JJ financial) (NN management) (NNS systems) (NNS requirements)) (, ,) (NP (JJ applicable) (JJ federal) (NN accounting) (NNS standards)) (, ,) (CC and) (NP (NP (NNP SGL)) (PP (IN at) (NP (DT the) (NN transaction) (NN level))))))))))))) (. .)))
The act does not require anything of any auditors.
( ( The act ) ( ( ( does not ) ( require ( anything ( of ( any auditors ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN act)) (VP (VBZ does) (RB not) (VP (VB require) (NP (NP (NN anything)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT any) (NNS auditors)))))) (. .)))
government
2contradiction
Premise: The act requires that auditors for each of the 24 departments and agencies named in the CFO Act report, as part of their annual audits of the agenciesa financial statements, whether the agenciesa financial management systems comply substantially with federal financial management systems requirements, applicable federal accounting standards, and SGL at the transaction level. <sep> Hypothesis: The act does not require anything of any auditors.
70,750
70750n
Also the Treasury requires departments to disclose instances of irregular expenditures arising from erroneous benefit awards and fraud by claimants.
( Also ( ( the Treasury ) ( ( requires ( departments ( to ( disclose ( instances ( of ( ( irregular expenditures ) ( ( arising ( from ( ( ( erroneous ( benefit awards ) ) and ) fraud ) ) ) ( by claimants ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (ADVP (RB Also)) (NP (DT the) (NNP Treasury)) (VP (VBZ requires) (S (NP (NNS departments)) (VP (TO to) (VP (VB disclose) (NP (NP (NNS instances)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NN irregular) (NNS expenditures)) (VP (VBG arising) (PP (IN from) (NP (NP (JJ erroneous) (NN benefit) (NNS awards)) (CC and) (NP (NN fraud)))) (PP (IN by) (NP (NNS claimants))))))))))) (. .)))
Departments are typically reluctant to disclose mistakes in the awarding of benefits.
( Departments ( ( ( are typically ) ( reluctant ( to ( ( disclose mistakes ) ( in ( ( the awarding ) ( of benefits ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Departments)) (VP (VBP are) (ADVP (RB typically)) (ADJP (JJ reluctant) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB disclose) (NP (NNS mistakes)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN awarding)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNS benefits)))))))))) (. .)))
government
1neutral
Premise: Also the Treasury requires departments to disclose instances of irregular expenditures arising from erroneous benefit awards and fraud by claimants. <sep> Hypothesis: Departments are typically reluctant to disclose mistakes in the awarding of benefits.
91,258
91258e
They built many impressive churches during the term of the first Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem, but in 1187 they were driven out by Muslim forces under the great warrior Saladin.
( ( ( ( ( They ( ( built ( many ( impressive churches ) ) ) ( during ( ( the term ) ( of ( ( the ( first ( Latin Kingdom ) ) ) ( of Jerusalem ) ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) but ) ( ( in 1187 ) ( they ( were ( ( ( driven out ) ( by ( Muslim forces ) ) ) ( under ( the ( great ( warrior Saladin ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (PRP They)) (VP (VBD built) (NP (JJ many) (JJ impressive) (NNS churches)) (PP (IN during) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN term)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ first) (NNP Latin) (NNP Kingdom)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP Jerusalem))))))))) (, ,) (CC but) (S (PP (IN in) (NP (CD 1187))) (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBD were) (VP (VBN driven) (PRT (RP out)) (PP (IN by) (NP (JJ Muslim) (NNS forces))) (PP (IN under) (NP (DT the) (JJ great) (NN warrior) (NN Saladin)))))) (. .)))
Saladin was a great Muslim warrior in 1187.
( Saladin ( ( was ( ( a ( great ( Muslim warrior ) ) ) ( in 1187 ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Saladin)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ great) (JJ Muslim) (NN warrior)) (PP (IN in) (NP (CD 1187))))) (. .)))
travel
0entailment
Premise: They built many impressive churches during the term of the first Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem, but in 1187 they were driven out by Muslim forces under the great warrior Saladin. <sep> Hypothesis: Saladin was a great Muslim warrior in 1187.
129,651
129651n
but a lot of women are knowledge as knowledge about football as i am
( ( but ( ( a lot ) ( of women ) ) ) ( are ( ( ( knowledge ( as knowledge ) ) ( about football ) ) ( as ( i am ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (SINV (PP (CC but) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN lot)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNS women))))) (VP (VBP are)) (NP (NP (NN knowledge)) (PP (IN as) (NP (NN knowledge))) (PP (IN about) (NP (NN football))) (SBAR (IN as) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP am)))))))
I have a lot of football knowledge.
( I ( ( have ( ( a lot ) ( of ( football knowledge ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP have) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN lot)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN football) (NN knowledge))))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
Premise: but a lot of women are knowledge as knowledge about football as i am <sep> Hypothesis: I have a lot of football knowledge.
32,707
32707c
yeah ooh i wish i could do that
( yeah ( ( ( ( ooh i ) wish ) i ) ( could ( do that ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (VP (VB yeah) (NP (NP (NN ooh) (FW i) (FW wish) (FW i)) (SBAR (S (VP (MD could) (VP (VB do) (NP (DT that))))))))))
I don't consider that to be very interesting, and I never want to try to do it myself.
( ( ( ( ( I ( ( do n't ) ( consider ( that ( to ( be ( very interesting ) ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) and ) ( I ( never ( want ( to ( try ( to ( ( do it ) myself ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP do) (RB n't) (VP (VB consider) (SBAR (IN that) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (RB very) (JJ interesting))))))))) (, ,) (CC and) (S (NP (PRP I)) (ADVP (RB never)) (VP (VBP want) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB try) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB do) (NP (PRP it)) (NP (PRP myself)))))))))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
Premise: yeah ooh i wish i could do that <sep> Hypothesis: I don't consider that to be very interesting, and I never want to try to do it myself.
16,731
16731e
Despite occasional tensions, perhaps inevitable in times of economic uncertainty, today French people increasingly recognize that the immigrants from France's departements in the West Indies and from former colonies ' Algeria, Tunisia, and Morocco ' enrich the national culture and add spice to the country's cuisine.
( ( Despite ( occasional tensions ) ) ( , ( ( perhaps ( inevitable ( in ( times ( of ( economic uncertainty ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( today ( ( French people ) ( ( increasingly ( recognize ( that ( ( the ( ( ( immigrants ( ( ( from ( ( ( France 's ) departements ) ( in ( the ( West Indies ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( from ( former colonies ) ) ) ) ' ) ( ( ( Algeria ( , ( Tunisia , ) ) ) and ) ( Morocco ' ) ) ) ) ( ( ( enrich ( the ( national culture ) ) ) and ) ( ( add spice ) ( to ( ( the ( country 's ) ) cuisine ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN Despite) (NP (JJ occasional) (NNS tensions))) (, ,) (S (ADVP (RB perhaps)) (ADJP (JJ inevitable) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (NNS times)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ economic) (NN uncertainty))))))) (, ,) (NP (NN today)) (NP (JJ French) (NNS people)) (VP (ADVP (RB increasingly)) (VBP recognize) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (DT the) (NP (NNS immigrants)) (PP (PP (IN from) (NP (NP (NP (NNP France) (POS 's)) (NNS departements)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NNP West) (NNP Indies))))) (CC and) (PP (IN from) (NP (JJ former) (NNS colonies)))) ('' ') (NP (NP (NNP Algeria) (, ,) (NNP Tunisia) (, ,)) (CC and) (NP (NNP Morocco) (POS ')))) (VP (VP (VBP enrich) (NP (DT the) (JJ national) (NN culture))) (CC and) (VP (VBP add) (NP (NN spice)) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN country) (POS 's)) (NN cuisine)))))))) (. .)))
French people increasingly recognize that some immigrants recognize national culture and add spice to the country's cuisine.
( ( French people ) ( increasingly ( ( recognize ( that ( ( some immigrants ) ( ( ( recognize ( national culture ) ) and ) ( ( add spice ) ( to ( ( the ( country 's ) ) cuisine ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (JJ French) (NNS people)) (ADVP (RB increasingly)) (VP (VBP recognize) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (DT some) (NNS immigrants)) (VP (VP (VB recognize) (NP (JJ national) (NN culture))) (CC and) (VP (VB add) (NP (NN spice)) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN country) (POS 's)) (NN cuisine)))))))) (. .)))
travel
0entailment
Premise: Despite occasional tensions, perhaps inevitable in times of economic uncertainty, today French people increasingly recognize that the immigrants from France's departements in the West Indies and from former colonies ' Algeria, Tunisia, and Morocco ' enrich the national culture and add spice to the country's cuisine. <sep> Hypothesis: French people increasingly recognize that some immigrants recognize national culture and add spice to the country's cuisine.
23,822
23822e
At times in recent years, the office has received its state and federal funding on a month-to-month basis, which one federal official called one step short of defunding.
( ( At ( times ( in ( recent years ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( the office ) ( ( has ( ( received ( its ( state ( and ( federal funding ) ) ) ) ) ( on ( ( ( a ( month-to-month basis ) ) , ) ( which ( ( one ( federal official ) ) ( ( called ( ( one step ) short ) ) ( of defunding ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN At) (NP (NP (NNS times)) (PP (IN in) (NP (JJ recent) (NNS years))))) (, ,) (NP (DT the) (NN office)) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN received) (NP (PRP$ its) (NN state) (CC and) (JJ federal) (NN funding)) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ month-to-month) (NN basis)) (, ,) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT which)) (S (NP (CD one) (JJ federal) (NN official)) (VP (VBD called) (ADVP (NP (CD one) (NN step)) (RB short)) (PP (IN of) (S (VP (VBG defunding))))))))))) (. .)))
The office gets state and federal funding.
( ( The office ) ( ( gets ( ( ( state and ) federal ) funding ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN office)) (VP (VBZ gets) (NP (UCP (NN state) (CC and) (JJ federal)) (NN funding))) (. .)))
government
0entailment
Premise: At times in recent years, the office has received its state and federal funding on a month-to-month basis, which one federal official called one step short of defunding. <sep> Hypothesis: The office gets state and federal funding.
43,774
43774n
Finally, the analysis reports, as required by paragraph 603(c), that the Commission has reduced burdens where possible and that the regulatory burdens retained are necessary to ensure the public receives the benefits of the new services in a prompt and efficient manner.
( Finally ( , ( ( the analysis ) ( ( ( ( ( reports , ) ( as ( required ( by ( ( paragraph 603 ) ( -LRB- ( c -RRB- ) ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) ( ( ( that ( ( the Commission ) ( has ( ( reduced burdens ) ( where possible ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( that ( ( the ( regulatory burdens ) ) ( retained ( are ( necessary ( to ( ensure ( ( the public ) ( receives ( ( the benefits ) ( of ( ( the ( new services ) ) ( in ( a ( ( ( prompt and ) efficient ) manner ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (ADVP (RB Finally)) (, ,) (NP (DT the) (NN analysis)) (VP (VBZ reports) (, ,) (SBAR (IN as) (S (VP (JJ required) (PP (IN by) (NP (NP (QP (CD paragraph) (CD 603))) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (X (SYM c)) (-RRB- -RRB-))))))) (, ,) (SBAR (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (DT the) (NNP Commission)) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN reduced) (S (NP (NNS burdens))) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB where)) (S (ADJP (JJ possible)))))))) (CC and) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (DT the) (JJ regulatory) (NNS burdens)) (VP (VBD retained) (SBAR (S (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (JJ necessary) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB ensure) (SBAR (S (NP (DT the) (NN public)) (VP (VBZ receives) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS benefits)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ new) (NNS services)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT a) (ADJP (JJ prompt) (CC and) (JJ efficient)) (NN manner))))))))))))))))))))) (. .)))
The commission reduced burdens on the employees.
( ( The commission ) ( ( ( reduced burdens ) ( on ( the employees ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN commission)) (VP (VBD reduced) (NP (NNS burdens)) (PP (IN on) (NP (DT the) (NNS employees)))) (. .)))
government
1neutral
Premise: Finally, the analysis reports, as required by paragraph 603(c), that the Commission has reduced burdens where possible and that the regulatory burdens retained are necessary to ensure the public receives the benefits of the new services in a prompt and efficient manner. <sep> Hypothesis: The commission reduced burdens on the employees.
21,537
21537e
I have found it hard to forgive the things you said against my dear husband but I am an old woman & very fond of you Yours affectionately, Emily Inglethorpe 79 It was handed to the jury who scrutinized it attentively.
( ( ( ( I ( have ( found ( it ( hard ( to ( forgive ( ( the things ) ( you ( said ( against ( my ( dear husband ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) but ) ( I ( ( ( ( am ( ( ( ( an ( old woman ) ) & ) very ) ( fond ( of ( you Yours ) ) ) ) ) affectionately ) , ) ( ( Emily ( Inglethorpe 79 ) ) ( It ( was ( handed ( to ( ( the jury ) ( who ( scrutinized ( it attentively ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP have) (VP (VBN found) (S (NP (PRP it)) (ADJP (JJ hard) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB forgive) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS things)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBD said) (PP (IN against) (NP (PRP$ my) (ADJP (RB dear)) (NN husband))))))))))))))) (CC but) (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP am) (NP (NP (DT an) (JJ old) (NN woman)) (CC &) (RB very) (NP (NP (NN fond)) (PP (IN of) (NP (PRP you) (NNS Yours))))) (ADVP (RB affectionately)) (, ,) (NP (NP (NNP Emily) (NNP Inglethorpe) (NNP 79)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN handed) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN jury)) (SBAR (WHNP (WP who)) (S (VP (VBN scrutinized) (S (NP (PRP it)) (ADJP (JJ attentively))))))))))))))) (. .)))
I am an old lady that likes you a lot.
( I ( ( am ( ( an ( old lady ) ) ( that ( likes ( you ( a lot ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP am) (NP (NP (DT an) (JJ old) (NN lady)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBZ likes) (S (NP (PRP you)) (NP (DT a) (NN lot)))))))) (. .)))
fiction
0entailment
Premise: I have found it hard to forgive the things you said against my dear husband but I am an old woman & very fond of you Yours affectionately, Emily Inglethorpe 79 It was handed to the jury who scrutinized it attentively. <sep> Hypothesis: I am an old lady that likes you a lot.
96,509
96509n
Tim, we never should have got into this quagmire, but now we have no choice but to ...
( Tim ( , ( ( ( ( ( we ( never ( should ( have ( got ( into ( this quagmire ) ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) but ) ( now ( we ( ( have ( no choice ) ) ( but to ) ) ) ) ) ... ) ) )
(ROOT (FRAG (ADVP (RB Tim)) (, ,) (S (S (NP (PRP we)) (ADVP (RB never)) (VP (MD should) (VP (VB have) (VP (VBN got) (PP (IN into) (NP (DT this) (NN quagmire))))))) (, ,) (CC but) (S (ADVP (RB now)) (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBP have) (NP (DT no) (NN choice)) (PP (CC but) (PP (TO to)))))) (: ...)))
Tim was an idiot and got them into this mess.
( Tim ( ( ( ( was ( an idiot ) ) and ) ( ( got them ) ( into ( this mess ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Tim)) (VP (VP (VBD was) (NP (DT an) (NN idiot))) (CC and) (VP (VBD got) (NP (PRP them)) (PP (IN into) (NP (DT this) (NN mess))))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
Premise: Tim, we never should have got into this quagmire, but now we have no choice but to ... <sep> Hypothesis: Tim was an idiot and got them into this mess.
122,552
122552n
and i had the book and i hadn't read it in so long so i read it the other day to see if i could so i can watch the movie
( and ( i ( ( had ( ( ( ( the book ) and ) i ) ( ( had n't ) ( ( ( read it ) ( in ( so long ) ) ) ( so ( i ( ( ( read it ) ( the ( other day ) ) ) ( to ( see ( if ( i could ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( so ( i ( can ( watch ( the movie ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (FRAG (CC and) (NP (NP (FW i)) (SBAR (S (VP (VBD had) (S (NP (NP (DT the) (NN book)) (CC and) (NP (FW i))) (VP (VBD had) (RB n't) (VP (VBN read) (NP (PRP it)) (PP (IN in) (ADVP (RB so) (RB long))) (SBAR (IN so) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBD read) (NP (PRP it)) (NP (DT the) (JJ other) (NN day)) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB see) (SBAR (IN if) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (MD could))))))))))))) (SBAR (IN so) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB watch) (NP (DT the) (NN movie))))))))))))
I enjoyed reading the book more than watching the movie.
( I ( ( enjoyed ( reading ( ( ( the book ) more ) ( than ( watching ( the movie ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD enjoyed) (S (VP (VBG reading) (PP (ADVP (NP (DT the) (NN book)) (RBR more)) (IN than) (S (VP (VBG watching) (NP (DT the) (NN movie)))))))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
Premise: and i had the book and i hadn't read it in so long so i read it the other day to see if i could so i can watch the movie <sep> Hypothesis: I enjoyed reading the book more than watching the movie.
113,542
113542c
Sunraider yearns to know who his mother is, and Hickman wants to know how Bliss became Sunraider.
( ( ( ( ( Sunraider ( yearns ( to ( know ( who ( ( his mother ) is ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) and ) ( Hickman ( wants ( to ( know ( how ( Bliss ( became Sunraider ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (NNP Sunraider)) (VP (VBZ yearns) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB know) (SBAR (WHNP (WP who)) (S (NP (PRP$ his) (NN mother)) (VP (VBZ is))))))))) (, ,) (CC and) (S (NP (NNP Hickman)) (VP (VBZ wants) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB know) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB how)) (S (NP (NNP Bliss)) (VP (VBD became) (NP (NNP Sunraider)))))))))) (. .)))
Sunraider knows the identity of his mother.
( Sunraider ( ( knows ( ( the identity ) ( of ( his mother ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Sunraider)) (VP (VBZ knows) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN identity)) (PP (IN of) (NP (PRP$ his) (NN mother))))) (. .)))
slate
2contradiction
Premise: Sunraider yearns to know who his mother is, and Hickman wants to know how Bliss became Sunraider. <sep> Hypothesis: Sunraider knows the identity of his mother.
26,056
26056c
You can take a ferryboat through the harbor, past the ingenious Plover Cove reservoir, a water catchment area appropriated by damming and draining a broad inlet from the sea.
( You ( ( can ( ( ( ( take ( a ferryboat ) ) ( through ( the harbor ) ) ) , ) ( past ( ( ( the ( ingenious ( Plover ( Cove reservoir ) ) ) ) , ) ( ( a ( water ( catchment area ) ) ) ( appropriated ( by ( ( ( ( damming and ) draining ) ( a ( broad inlet ) ) ) ( from ( the sea ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP You)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB take) (NP (DT a) (NN ferryboat)) (PP (IN through) (NP (DT the) (NN harbor))) (, ,) (PP (IN past) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ ingenious) (NNP Plover) (NNP Cove) (NN reservoir)) (, ,) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN water) (NN catchment) (NN area)) (VP (VBN appropriated) (PP (IN by) (S (VP (VBG damming) (CC and) (VBG draining) (NP (DT a) (JJ broad) (NN inlet)) (PP (IN from) (NP (DT the) (NN sea)))))))))))) (. .)))
You cannot take a ferry boat through the harbour.
( You ( ( ( can not ) ( ( take ( a ( ferry boat ) ) ) ( through ( the harbour ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP You)) (VP (MD can) (RB not) (VP (VB take) (NP (DT a) (NN ferry) (NN boat)) (PP (IN through) (NP (DT the) (NN harbour))))) (. .)))
travel
2contradiction
Premise: You can take a ferryboat through the harbor, past the ingenious Plover Cove reservoir, a water catchment area appropriated by damming and draining a broad inlet from the sea. <sep> Hypothesis: You cannot take a ferry boat through the harbour.
115,606
115606c
oh really huh do you do they um have a policy where they counsel people if they come back positive or do they fire them right away or
( ( oh ( really huh ) ) ( do ( you ( do ( they ( um ( have ( ( a policy ) ( where ( they ( ( counsel people ) ( if ( they ( ( ( ( come back ) positive ) or ) ( do ( they ( fire ( them ( right ( away or ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNP oh)) (ADJP (RB really) (JJ huh))) (VP (VBP do) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP do) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP they)) (ADVP (RB um)) (VP (VBP have) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN policy)) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB where)) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBD counsel) (NP (NNS people)) (SBAR (IN if) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VP (VB come) (PRT (RP back)) (ADJP (JJ positive))) (CC or) (VP (VB do) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VB fire) (S (NP (PRP them)) (ADJP (RB right)) (ADVP (RB away) (CC or))))))))))))))))))))))
I have heard that they fire the people who come in positive.
( I ( ( have ( heard ( that ( they ( fire ( ( the people ) ( who ( come ( in positive ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP have) (VP (VBN heard) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VB fire) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS people)) (SBAR (WHNP (WP who)) (S (VP (VBN come) (PP (IN in) (ADJP (JJ positive)))))))))))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
Premise: oh really huh do you do they um have a policy where they counsel people if they come back positive or do they fire them right away or <sep> Hypothesis: I have heard that they fire the people who come in positive.
12,515
12515e
The Chicago Museum of Contemporary Art just hired its new head away from Disney.
( ( ( The ( Chicago Museum ) ) ( of ( Contemporary Art ) ) ) ( just ( ( ( ( hired ( its ( new head ) ) ) away ) ( from Disney ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NNP Chicago) (NNP Museum)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP Contemporary) (NNP Art)))) (ADVP (RB just)) (VP (VBD hired) (NP (PRP$ its) (JJ new) (NN head)) (PRT (RP away)) (PP (IN from) (NP (NNP Disney)))) (. .)))
The new head of the Chicago Museum of Contemporary Art was just hired away from Disney.
( ( ( The ( new head ) ) ( of ( ( the ( Chicago Museum ) ) ( of ( Contemporary Art ) ) ) ) ) ( ( ( was just ) ( ( hired away ) ( from Disney ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (JJ new) (NN head)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP Chicago) (NNP Museum)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP Contemporary) (NNP Art)))))) (VP (VBD was) (ADVP (RB just)) (VP (VBN hired) (PRT (RP away)) (PP (IN from) (NP (NNP Disney))))) (. .)))
slate
0entailment
Premise: The Chicago Museum of Contemporary Art just hired its new head away from Disney. <sep> Hypothesis: The new head of the Chicago Museum of Contemporary Art was just hired away from Disney.
29,098
29098n
The United States has facilitated the importation of foreign agricultural workers in response to alleged shortages of workers in the United States for many years under various programs.
( ( The ( United States ) ) ( ( has ( ( ( facilitated ( ( the importation ) ( of ( ( foreign ( agricultural workers ) ) ( in response ) ) ) ) ) ( to ( ( alleged shortages ) ( of ( workers ( in ( the ( United States ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( for ( ( many years ) ( under ( various programs ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNP United) (NNPS States)) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN facilitated) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN importation)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (JJ foreign) (JJ agricultural) (NNS workers)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NN response)))))) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (JJ alleged) (NNS shortages)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNS workers)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NNP United) (NNPS States))))))) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (JJ many) (NNS years)) (PP (IN under) (NP (JJ various) (NNS programs))))))) (. .)))
The shortage of workers in the United States is the result of a bad economy.
( ( ( The shortage ) ( of ( workers ( in ( the ( United States ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( is ( ( the result ) ( of ( a ( bad economy ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN shortage)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNS workers)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NNP United) (NNPS States)))))) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN result)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT a) (JJ bad) (NN economy))))) (. .)))
government
1neutral
Premise: The United States has facilitated the importation of foreign agricultural workers in response to alleged shortages of workers in the United States for many years under various programs. <sep> Hypothesis: The shortage of workers in the United States is the result of a bad economy.
103,140
103140c
The Shore comprises a quayside and several cobbled lanes with restaurants where you can have a pleasant lunch.
( ( The Shore ) ( ( ( comprises ( a ( quayside ( and ( several ( cobbled lanes ) ) ) ) ) ) ( with ( restaurants ( where ( you ( can ( have ( a ( pleasant lunch ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNP Shore)) (VP (VBZ comprises) (NP (DT a) (NN quayside) (CC and) (JJ several) (NN cobbled) (NNS lanes)) (PP (IN with) (NP (NP (NNS restaurants)) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB where)) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB have) (NP (DT a) (JJ pleasant) (NN lunch))))))))) (. .)))
If you're looking for something to eat, sadly, The Shore doesn't have any restaurants.
( ( If ( you ( 're ( ( looking ( for something ) ) ( to eat ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( sadly ( , ( ( The Shore ) ( ( ( does n't ) ( have ( any restaurants ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (SBAR (IN If) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP 're) (VP (VBG looking) (PP (IN for) (NP (NN something))) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB eat)))))))) (, ,) (ADVP (RB sadly)) (, ,) (NP (DT The) (NNP Shore)) (VP (VBZ does) (RB n't) (VP (VB have) (NP (DT any) (NNS restaurants)))) (. .)))
travel
2contradiction
Premise: The Shore comprises a quayside and several cobbled lanes with restaurants where you can have a pleasant lunch. <sep> Hypothesis: If you're looking for something to eat, sadly, The Shore doesn't have any restaurants.
144,274
144274e
i'm in Rochester New York everybody else but one has been in Texas
( i ( ( 'm ( in ( Rochester ( New ( York ( everybody else ) ) ) ) ) ) ( but ( one ( has ( been ( in Texas ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP 'm) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Rochester) (NNP New) (NNP York) (NN everybody) (RB else))) (SBAR (CC but) (S (NP (PRP one)) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN been) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Texas))))))))))
There are only two people not in Texas.
( There ( ( ( are ( ( only ( two people ) ) not ) ) ( in Texas ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBP are) (ADVP (NP (RB only) (CD two) (NNS people)) (RB not)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Texas)))) (. .)))
telephone
0entailment
Premise: i'm in Rochester New York everybody else but one has been in Texas <sep> Hypothesis: There are only two people not in Texas.
44,624
44624c
That's why they'll make sure to stop him.
( That ( ( 's ( why ( they ( 'll ( make ( sure ( to ( stop him ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT That)) (VP (VBZ 's) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB why)) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (MD 'll) (VP (VB make) (ADJP (JJ sure) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB stop) (NP (PRP him))))))))))) (. .)))
There is no need to stop him.
( There ( ( is ( no ( need ( to ( stop him ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (DT no) (NN need) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB stop) (NP (PRP him))))))) (. .)))
slate
2contradiction
Premise: That's why they'll make sure to stop him. <sep> Hypothesis: There is no need to stop him.
138,369
138369c
In-depth, very extensive case studies of several water catchment areas were conducted, and the final report is based on a synthesis of the findings from the case studies-another example of integration of findings across diverse sites (U.S.
( ( ( ( In-depth ( , ( ( ( ( very extensive ) ( case studies ) ) ( of ( several ( water ( catchment areas ) ) ) ) ) ( were conducted ) ) ) ) , ) and ) ( ( the ( final report ) ) ( is ( ( based ( on ( ( a synthesis ) ( of ( the findings ) ) ) ) ) ( from ( ( the ( case ( studies-another example ) ) ) ( of ( integration ( of ( findings ( across ( diverse ( sites ( -LRB- U.S. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (S (ADVP (RB In-depth)) (, ,) (NP (NP (ADJP (RB very) (JJ extensive)) (NN case) (NNS studies)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ several) (NN water) (NN catchment) (NNS areas)))) (VP (VBD were) (VP (VBN conducted)))) (, ,) (CC and) (S (NP (DT the) (JJ final) (NN report)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBN based) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN synthesis)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NNS findings))))) (PP (IN from) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN case) (NN studies-another) (NN example)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NN integration)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNS findings)) (PP (IN across) (NP (NP (JJ diverse)) (NP (NNP sites) (-LRB- -LRB-) (NNP U.S.)))))))))))))))
Nobody has ever taken the time to study water catchment areas.
( Nobody ( ( ( has ever ) ( taken ( the ( time ( to ( study ( water ( catchment areas ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NN Nobody)) (VP (VBZ has) (ADVP (RB ever)) (VP (VBN taken) (NP (DT the) (NN time) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB study) (NP (NN water) (NN catchment) (NNS areas)))))))) (. .)))
government
2contradiction
Premise: In-depth, very extensive case studies of several water catchment areas were conducted, and the final report is based on a synthesis of the findings from the case studies-another example of integration of findings across diverse sites (U.S. <sep> Hypothesis: Nobody has ever taken the time to study water catchment areas.
75,321
75321e
Advertisers frequently urge us to rebel, and they frequently urge us to conform.
( ( ( ( ( Advertisers ( frequently ( urge ( us ( to rebel ) ) ) ) ) , ) and ) ( they ( frequently ( urge ( us ( to conform ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (NNS Advertisers)) (ADVP (RB frequently)) (VP (VBP urge) (S (NP (PRP us)) (VP (TO to) (VP (VB rebel)))))) (, ,) (CC and) (S (NP (PRP they)) (ADVP (RB frequently)) (VP (VBP urge) (S (NP (PRP us)) (VP (TO to) (VP (VB conform)))))) (. .)))
Advertisers urge us to do things.
( Advertisers ( ( urge ( us ( to ( do things ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNS Advertisers)) (VP (VBP urge) (S (NP (PRP us)) (VP (TO to) (VP (VB do) (NP (NNS things)))))) (. .)))
slate
0entailment
Premise: Advertisers frequently urge us to rebel, and they frequently urge us to conform. <sep> Hypothesis: Advertisers urge us to do things.
6,000
6000n
'I do hope you will come around to seeing things my way.'
( ' ( I ( ( ( do ( hope ( you ( will ( ( come around ) ( to ( ( seeing things ) ( my way ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ' ) ) )
(ROOT (S ('' ') (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP do) (SBAR (S (VP (VBP hope) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB come) (PRT (RP around)) (PP (TO to) (S (VP (VBG seeing) (NP (NNS things)) (NP (PRP$ my) (NN way))))))))))))) (. .) ('' ')))
There was a subtle threat in her voice as she said 'I believe you will come around to seeing things my way.'
( There ( ( ( ( was ( ( a ( subtle threat ) ) ( in ( her voice ) ) ) ) ( as ( she ( ( said ' ) ( I ( believe ( you ( will ( ( come around ) ( to ( ( seeing things ) ( my way ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ' ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ subtle) (NN threat)) (PP (IN in) (NP (PRP$ her) (NN voice)))) (SBAR (IN as) (S (NP (PRP she)) (VP (VBD said) (`` ') (SBAR (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP believe) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB come) (PRT (RP around)) (PP (TO to) (S (VP (VBG seeing) (NP (NNS things)) (NP (PRP$ my) (NN way)))))))))))))))) (. .) ('' ')))
fiction
1neutral
Premise: 'I do hope you will come around to seeing things my way.' <sep> Hypothesis: There was a subtle threat in her voice as she said 'I believe you will come around to seeing things my way.'
26,018
26018c
A remnant of the second century a.d. wall that once supported the Temple Mount, this is the most revered place in the world for the Jewish faith.
( ( ( A remnant ) ( of ( ( the ( second ( century ( a.d. wall ) ) ) ) ( that ( once ( supported ( ( ( the ( Temple Mount ) ) , ) this ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( is ( ( the ( ( most revered ) place ) ) ( in ( ( the world ) ( for ( the ( Jewish faith ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT A) (NN remnant)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ second) (NN century) (NN a.d.) (NN wall)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (ADVP (RB once)) (VP (VBD supported) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP Temple) (NNP Mount)) (, ,) (NP (DT this))))))))) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (DT the) (ADJP (RBS most) (JJ revered)) (NN place)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN world)) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT the) (JJ Jewish) (NN faith))))))) (. .)))
The remnant of the wall is an interesting historical artifact, but doesn't have much religious meaning anymore.
( ( ( The remnant ) ( of ( the wall ) ) ) ( ( ( ( ( is ( an ( interesting ( historical artifact ) ) ) ) , ) but ) ( ( does n't ) ( ( have ( much ( religious meaning ) ) ) anymore ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN remnant)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN wall)))) (VP (VP (VBZ is) (NP (DT an) (JJ interesting) (JJ historical) (NN artifact))) (, ,) (CC but) (VP (VBZ does) (RB n't) (VP (VB have) (NP (JJ much) (JJ religious) (NN meaning)) (ADVP (RB anymore))))) (. .)))
travel
2contradiction
Premise: A remnant of the second century a.d. wall that once supported the Temple Mount, this is the most revered place in the world for the Jewish faith. <sep> Hypothesis: The remnant of the wall is an interesting historical artifact, but doesn't have much religious meaning anymore.
36,857
36857c
you know the company insurance and and
( you ( know ( ( ( the ( company insurance ) ) and ) and ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN company) (NN insurance)) (CC and) (NP (NNP and))))))
The company has no insurance
( ( The company ) ( has ( no insurance ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN company)) (VP (VBZ has) (NP (DT no) (NN insurance)))))
telephone
2contradiction
Premise: you know the company insurance and and <sep> Hypothesis: The company has no insurance
62,373
62373n
have to go replace them with uh something a little hardier
( ( have ( to ( go ( ( replace them ) ( with ( uh something ) ) ) ) ) ) ( a ( little hardier ) ) )
(ROOT (SINV (VP (VBP have) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB go) (VP (VB replace) (NP (PRP them)) (PP (IN with) (NP (JJ uh) (NN something)))))))) (NP (DT a) (JJ little) (NN hardier))))
Most shrubs are hardier than them.
( ( Most shrubs ) ( ( are ( hardier ( than them ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (JJS Most) (NNS shrubs)) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (JJ hardier) (PP (IN than) (NP (PRP them))))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
Premise: have to go replace them with uh something a little hardier <sep> Hypothesis: Most shrubs are hardier than them.
20,811
20811c
But these are the trivia of what he left me and my sister.
( But ( these ( ( are ( ( the trivia ) ( of ( what ( he ( left ( ( me and ) ( my sister ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (CC But) (NP (DT these)) (VP (VBP are) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS trivia)) (PP (IN of) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBD left) (NP (NP (PRP me)) (CC and) (NP (PRP$ my) (NN sister))))))))) (. .)))
But these are the answers of what he left me and my sister.
( But ( these ( ( are ( ( the answers ) ( of ( what ( he ( left ( ( me and ) ( my sister ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (CC But) (NP (DT these)) (VP (VBP are) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS answers)) (PP (IN of) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBD left) (NP (NP (PRP me)) (CC and) (NP (PRP$ my) (NN sister))))))))) (. .)))
slate
2contradiction
Premise: But these are the trivia of what he left me and my sister. <sep> Hypothesis: But these are the answers of what he left me and my sister.
39,140
39140n
The men promise money to the brides' families, then often treat the wives as sex slaves, or worse.
( ( The men ) ( ( promise ( ( ( ( money ( to ( ( the ( brides ' ) ) families ) ) ) ( , ( ( then ( often ( treat ( ( the wives ) ( as ( sex slaves ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) ) ) or ) worse ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNS men)) (VP (VBP promise) (NP (NP (NP (NP (NN money)) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS brides) (POS ')) (NNS families)))) (PRN (, ,) (S (ADVP (RB then)) (VP (ADVP (RB often)) (VB treat) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS wives)) (PP (IN as) (NP (NN sex) (NNS slaves)))))) (, ,))) (CC or) (SBAR (S (ADJP (RBR worse)))))) (. .)))
The wives and their families have no idea what they are getting into.
( ( ( ( The wives ) and ) ( their families ) ) ( ( have ( ( no idea ) ( what ( they ( are ( getting into ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NNS wives)) (CC and) (NP (PRP$ their) (NNS families))) (VP (VBP have) (NP (NP (DT no) (NN idea)) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBG getting) (PP (IN into)))))))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
Premise: The men promise money to the brides' families, then often treat the wives as sex slaves, or worse. <sep> Hypothesis: The wives and their families have no idea what they are getting into.
4,006
4006c
The car was waiting, and I drove back.
( ( ( ( ( ( The car ) ( was waiting ) ) , ) and ) ( I ( drove back ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (DT The) (NN car)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBG waiting)))) (, ,) (CC and) (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD drove) (ADVP (RB back)))) (. .)))
The car left and I stayed.
( ( ( ( ( The car ) left ) and ) ( I stayed ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (DT The) (NN car)) (VP (VBD left))) (CC and) (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD stayed))) (. .)))
fiction
2contradiction
Premise: The car was waiting, and I drove back. <sep> Hypothesis: The car left and I stayed.
9,985
9985n
you know it's it's pretty nice and friendly out there and you can't find that in all sports
( you ( know ( it ( 's ( ( ( it ( 's ( ( pretty ( ( nice and ) friendly ) ) ( out there ) ) ) ) and ) ( you ( ( ca n't ) ( find ( that ( in ( all sports ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (SBAR (S (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (ADJP (ADJP (RB pretty) (JJ nice) (CC and) (JJ friendly)) (PP (IN out) (NP (RB there)))))) (CC and) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (MD ca) (RB n't) (VP (VB find) (NP (NP (DT that)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT all) (NNS sports)))))))))))))))
It's pretty nice and friendly out there in the soccer field
( It ( ( ( 's ( pretty ( ( nice and ) friendly ) ) ) ( out there ) ) ( in ( the ( soccer field ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (VBZ 's) (ADJP (RB pretty) (JJ nice) (CC and) (JJ friendly)) (ADVP (IN out) (RB there)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NN soccer) (NN field))))))
telephone
1neutral
Premise: you know it's it's pretty nice and friendly out there and you can't find that in all sports <sep> Hypothesis: It's pretty nice and friendly out there in the soccer field
74,391
74391n
i mean cucumbers here grow like crazy
( i ( mean ( cucumbers ( here ( grow ( like crazy ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP mean) (SBAR (S (NP (NNS cucumbers)) (ADVP (RB here)) (VP (VBP grow) (PP (IN like) (ADJP (JJ crazy)))))))))
Cucumbers grow really well here due to the rain.
( Cucumbers ( ( grow ( ( really ( ( well here ) due ) ) ( to ( the rain ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNS Cucumbers)) (VP (VBP grow) (ADJP (ADJP (RB really) (ADVP (RB well) (RB here)) (JJ due)) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (NN rain))))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
Premise: i mean cucumbers here grow like crazy <sep> Hypothesis: Cucumbers grow really well here due to the rain.
55,345
55345c
for the machine yeah
( for ( the ( machine yeah ) ) )
(ROOT (PP (IN for) (NP (DT the) (NN machine) (NN yeah))))
No, do not use the machine.
( No ( , ( ( ( do not ) ( use ( the machine ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (INTJ (UH No)) (, ,) (VP (VB do) (RB not) (VP (VB use) (NP (DT the) (NN machine)))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
Premise: for the machine yeah <sep> Hypothesis: No, do not use the machine.
104,747
104747c
It's now a quiet residential refuge popular with artists and tourists seeking to escape the mobs.
( It ( ( ( 's now ) ( ( a ( quiet ( residential refuge ) ) ) ( popular ( with ( ( ( artists and ) tourists ) ( seeking ( to ( escape ( the mobs ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (VBZ 's) (ADVP (RB now)) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ quiet) (JJ residential) (NN refuge)) (ADJP (JJ popular) (PP (IN with) (NP (NP (NNS artists) (CC and) (NNS tourists)) (VP (VBG seeking) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB escape) (NP (DT the) (NNS mobs))))))))))) (. .)))
It is a noisy residential area popular with musicians.
( It ( ( is ( ( a ( noisy ( residential area ) ) ) ( popular ( with musicians ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ noisy) (JJ residential) (NN area)) (ADJP (JJ popular) (PP (IN with) (NP (NNS musicians)))))) (. .)))
travel
2contradiction
Premise: It's now a quiet residential refuge popular with artists and tourists seeking to escape the mobs. <sep> Hypothesis: It is a noisy residential area popular with musicians.
133,967
133967c
We strongly disagree with the Vice President's objections to our audit and access authority.
( We ( strongly ( ( ( disagree ( with ( ( the ( Vice ( President 's ) ) ) objections ) ) ) ( to ( our ( audit ( and ( access authority ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP We)) (ADVP (RB strongly)) (VP (VBP disagree) (PP (IN with) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP Vice) (NNP President) (POS 's)) (NNS objections))) (PP (TO to) (NP (PRP$ our) (NN audit) (CC and) (NN access) (NN authority)))) (. .)))
The Vice President gave the go-ahead to our audit authority.
( ( The ( Vice President ) ) ( ( ( gave ( the go-ahead ) ) ( to ( our ( audit authority ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNP Vice) (NNP President)) (VP (VBD gave) (NP (DT the) (NN go-ahead)) (PP (TO to) (NP (PRP$ our) (NN audit) (NN authority)))) (. .)))
government
2contradiction
Premise: We strongly disagree with the Vice President's objections to our audit and access authority. <sep> Hypothesis: The Vice President gave the go-ahead to our audit authority.
16,146
16146n
And, as SurfWatch's promotional literature is happy to point out, filters can help protect management from liability for permitting sexually explicit material in the workplace.
( And ( , ( ( as ( ( ( SurfWatch 's ) ( promotional literature ) ) ( is ( happy ( to ( point out ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( filters ( ( can ( help ( ( ( protect management ) ( from liability ) ) ( for ( ( permitting ( sexually ( explicit material ) ) ) ( in ( the workplace ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (CC And) (, ,) (SBAR (IN as) (S (NP (NP (NNP SurfWatch) (POS 's)) (JJ promotional) (NN literature)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (JJ happy) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB point) (PRT (RP out))))))))) (, ,) (NP (NNS filters)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB help) (VP (VB protect) (NP (NN management)) (PP (IN from) (NP (NN liability))) (PP (IN for) (S (VP (VBG permitting) (NP (RB sexually) (JJ explicit) (NN material)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NN workplace))))))))) (. .)))
In the past, management has been held liable for allowing explicit material in the workplace.
( ( In ( the past ) ) ( , ( management ( ( has ( been ( held ( liable ( for ( ( allowing ( explicit material ) ) ( in ( the workplace ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN In) (NP (DT the) (NN past))) (, ,) (NP (NN management)) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN been) (VP (VBN held) (ADJP (JJ liable) (PP (IN for) (S (VP (VBG allowing) (NP (JJ explicit) (NN material)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NN workplace)))))))))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
Premise: And, as SurfWatch's promotional literature is happy to point out, filters can help protect management from liability for permitting sexually explicit material in the workplace. <sep> Hypothesis: In the past, management has been held liable for allowing explicit material in the workplace.
96,197
96197n
Only one son had survived to tell of the disaster.
( ( Only ( one son ) ) ( ( had ( survived ( to ( tell ( of ( the disaster ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (RB Only) (CD one) (NN son)) (VP (VBD had) (VP (VBN survived) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB tell) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN disaster)))))))) (. .)))
He was mentally scarred from the disaster.
( He ( ( ( was ( mentally scarred ) ) ( from ( the disaster ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP He)) (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (RB mentally) (JJ scarred)) (PP (IN from) (NP (DT the) (NN disaster)))) (. .)))
fiction
1neutral
Premise: Only one son had survived to tell of the disaster. <sep> Hypothesis: He was mentally scarred from the disaster.
80,812
80812n
APHIS performed an environmental assessment and determined that the actions required or authorized by this rule will not present a significant risk of introducing
( APHIS ( ( ( performed ( an ( environmental assessment ) ) ) and ) ( determined ( that ( ( ( the actions ) ( ( ( required or ) authorized ) ( by ( this rule ) ) ) ) ( ( will not ) ( present ( ( a ( significant risk ) ) ( of introducing ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNS APHIS)) (VP (VP (VBD performed) (NP (DT an) (JJ environmental) (NN assessment))) (CC and) (VP (VBD determined) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS actions)) (VP (VBN required) (CC or) (VBN authorized) (PP (IN by) (NP (DT this) (NN rule))))) (VP (MD will) (RB not) (VP (VB present) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ significant) (NN risk)) (PP (IN of) (S (VP (VBG introducing)))))))))))))
They were very cautious with their evaluations.
( They ( ( ( were ( very cautious ) ) ( with ( their evaluations ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP They)) (VP (VBD were) (ADJP (RB very) (JJ cautious)) (PP (IN with) (NP (PRP$ their) (NNS evaluations)))) (. .)))
government
1neutral
Premise: APHIS performed an environmental assessment and determined that the actions required or authorized by this rule will not present a significant risk of introducing <sep> Hypothesis: They were very cautious with their evaluations.
122,509
122509e
They were longitudinal, were made by on-site observers who sought participant-observer roles, and constituted an inquiry structured from an evolving understanding of events and their meaning to the persons involved in them.
( They ( ( ( ( ( ( ( were longitudinal ) , ) ( were ( made ( by ( ( on-site observers ) ( who ( sought ( participant-observer roles ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) and ) ( constituted ( ( an inquiry ) ( ( structured ( from ( ( an ( evolving understanding ) ) ( of ( ( events and ) ( their meaning ) ) ) ) ) ) ( to ( ( the persons ) ( involved ( in them ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP They)) (VP (VP (VBD were) (ADJP (JJ longitudinal))) (, ,) (VP (VBD were) (VP (VBN made) (PP (IN by) (NP (NP (JJ on-site) (NNS observers)) (SBAR (WHNP (WP who)) (S (VP (VBD sought) (NP (JJ participant-observer) (NNS roles))))))))) (, ,) (CC and) (VP (VBD constituted) (NP (NP (DT an) (NN inquiry)) (VP (VBN structured) (PP (IN from) (NP (NP (DT an) (JJ evolving) (NN understanding)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNS events)) (CC and) (NP (PRP$ their) (NN meaning)))))) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS persons)) (VP (VBN involved) (PP (IN in) (NP (PRP them)))))))))) (. .)))
They were made on site by observers, constituted an inquiry, and were longitudinal.
( They ( ( ( ( ( ( ( were ( ( made ( on site ) ) ( by observers ) ) ) , ) ( constituted ( an inquiry ) ) ) , ) and ) ( were longitudinal ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP They)) (VP (VP (VBD were) (VP (VBN made) (PP (IN on) (NP (NN site))) (PP (IN by) (NP (NNS observers))))) (, ,) (VP (VBD constituted) (NP (DT an) (NN inquiry))) (, ,) (CC and) (VP (VBD were) (ADJP (JJ longitudinal)))) (. .)))
government
0entailment
Premise: They were longitudinal, were made by on-site observers who sought participant-observer roles, and constituted an inquiry structured from an evolving understanding of events and their meaning to the persons involved in them. <sep> Hypothesis: They were made on site by observers, constituted an inquiry, and were longitudinal.
36,475
36475c
He thought philandering husbands would be the ones taking advantage of the argument about how cheating was hard to control.
( He ( ( thought ( ( philandering husbands ) ( would ( be ( ( the ones ) ( taking ( advantage ( of ( ( the argument ) ( about ( how ( cheating ( was ( hard ( to control ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP He)) (VP (VBD thought) (SBAR (S (NP (VBG philandering) (NNS husbands)) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB be) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS ones)) (VP (VBG taking) (NP (NP (NN advantage)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN argument)) (PP (IN about) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB how)) (S (NP (NN cheating)) (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (JJ hard) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB control))))))))))))))))))) (. .)))
Husbands never cheat on their wives.
( Husbands ( never ( ( cheat ( on ( their wives ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNS Husbands)) (ADVP (RB never)) (VP (VBP cheat) (PP (IN on) (NP (PRP$ their) (NNS wives)))) (. .)))
slate
2contradiction
Premise: He thought philandering husbands would be the ones taking advantage of the argument about how cheating was hard to control. <sep> Hypothesis: Husbands never cheat on their wives.
22,477
22477c
However, a change would not seem likely to have a negative impact, since, in contrast to the current policy, it would be consistent with the airlines' position that frequent flyer miles belong to the individual traveler.
( However ( , ( ( a change ) ( ( ( would not ) ( seem ( likely ( to ( ( ( have ( a ( negative impact ) ) ) , ) ( since ( , ( ( in ( contrast ( to ( the ( current policy ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( it ( would ( ( be ( consistent ( with ( ( the ( airlines ' ) ) position ) ) ) ) ( that ( ( frequent ( flyer miles ) ) ( belong ( to ( the ( individual traveler ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (ADVP (RB However)) (, ,) (NP (DT a) (NN change)) (VP (MD would) (RB not) (VP (VB seem) (ADJP (JJ likely) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB have) (NP (DT a) (JJ negative) (NN impact)) (, ,) (SBAR (IN since) (S (, ,) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (NN contrast)) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (JJ current) (NN policy))))) (, ,) (NP (PRP it)) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (JJ consistent) (PP (IN with) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS airlines) (POS ')) (NN position)))) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (JJ frequent) (NN flyer) (NNS miles)) (VP (VBP belong) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (JJ individual) (NN traveler)))))))))))))))) (. .)))
Individuals are groups of people or businesses that work as a team to achieve a goal.
( Individuals ( ( are ( ( groups ( of ( ( people or ) businesses ) ) ) ( that ( work ( as ( ( a team ) ( to ( achieve ( a goal ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNS Individuals)) (VP (VBP are) (NP (NP (NNS groups)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNS people) (CC or) (NNS businesses))) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBP work) (SBAR (IN as) (S (NP (DT a) (NN team)) (VP (TO to) (VP (VB achieve) (NP (DT a) (NN goal))))))))))) (. .)))
government
2contradiction
Premise: However, a change would not seem likely to have a negative impact, since, in contrast to the current policy, it would be consistent with the airlines' position that frequent flyer miles belong to the individual traveler. <sep> Hypothesis: Individuals are groups of people or businesses that work as a team to achieve a goal.
27,378
27378n
Everywhere silence, and shuttered windows.
( Everywhere ( ( ( ( silence , ) and ) ( shuttered windows ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Everywhere)) (VP (VP (VBZ silence)) (, ,) (CC and) (VP (VBD shuttered) (NP (NNS windows)))) (. .)))
There was a storm coming so the windows were shuttered.
( There ( ( was ( ( a storm ) ( coming ( so ( ( the windows ) ( were shuttered ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN storm)) (VP (VBG coming) (SBAR (IN so) (S (NP (DT the) (NNS windows)) (VP (VBD were) (ADJP (JJ shuttered)))))))) (. .)))
fiction
1neutral
Premise: Everywhere silence, and shuttered windows. <sep> Hypothesis: There was a storm coming so the windows were shuttered.
48,477
48477e
A narrow cobbled trail of 587 steps leads from the town to the small port below, now the domain of a fleet of donkeys that wait to carry cruise ship passengers into town.
( ( ( A ( narrow ( cobbled trail ) ) ) ( of ( 587 steps ) ) ) ( ( leads ( from ( ( ( ( ( the town ) ( to ( the ( small ( port below ) ) ) ) ) , ) now ) ( ( the domain ) ( of ( ( a fleet ) ( of ( donkeys ( that ( wait ( to ( ( carry ( cruise ( ship passengers ) ) ) ( into town ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT A) (JJ narrow) (JJ cobbled) (NN trail)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ 587) (NNS steps)))) (VP (VBZ leads) (PP (IN from) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN town)) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (JJ small) (NN port) (IN below))) (, ,) (ADVP (RB now)) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN domain)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN fleet)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNS donkeys)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBP wait) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB carry) (NP (NN cruise) (NN ship) (NNS passengers)) (PP (IN into) (NP (NN town))))))))))))))))) (. .)))
A fleet of donkeys ferries passengers from the town to the port.
( ( ( A fleet ) ( of donkeys ) ) ( ( ( ( ferries passengers ) ( from ( the town ) ) ) ( to ( the port ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT A) (NN fleet)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNS donkeys)))) (VP (VBD ferries) (NP (NNS passengers)) (PP (IN from) (NP (DT the) (NN town))) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (NN port)))) (. .)))
travel
0entailment
Premise: A narrow cobbled trail of 587 steps leads from the town to the small port below, now the domain of a fleet of donkeys that wait to carry cruise ship passengers into town. <sep> Hypothesis: A fleet of donkeys ferries passengers from the town to the port.
1,477
1477n
but anyway well um i can't think of a whole lot more to say
( but ( anyway ( ( well um ) ( i ( ( ca n't ) ( ( think ( of ( a ( whole ( lot more ) ) ) ) ) ( to say ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (FRAG (CC but) (ADVP (RB anyway)) (SBAR (X (ADVP (RB well)) (NP (NN um))) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (MD ca) (RB n't) (VP (VB think) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT a) (JJ whole) (NN lot) (JJR more))) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB say))))))))))
I can't say more about immigration.
( I ( ( ( ca n't ) ( ( say more ) ( about immigration ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (MD ca) (RB n't) (VP (VB say) (NP (JJR more)) (PP (IN about) (NP (NN immigration))))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
Premise: but anyway well um i can't think of a whole lot more to say <sep> Hypothesis: I can't say more about immigration.
10,334
10334c
um so do you have a personal computer
( ( um so ) ( do ( you ( have ( a ( personal computer ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NN um) (RB so)) (VP (VBP do) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP have) (NP (DT a) (JJ personal) (NN computer))))))))
You don't have any computers in your house, right?
( You ( ( ( do n't ) ( ( ( have ( ( any computers ) ( in ( your house ) ) ) ) , ) right ) ) ? ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP You)) (VP (VBP do) (RB n't) (VP (VB have) (NP (NP (DT any) (NNS computers)) (PP (IN in) (NP (PRP$ your) (NN house)))) (, ,) (ADVP (RB right)))) (. ?)))
telephone
2contradiction
Premise: um so do you have a personal computer <sep> Hypothesis: You don't have any computers in your house, right?
132,012
132012n
what'd they do for that did they have to cast it and
( what ( ( 'd they ) ( do ( for ( that ( did ( they ( have ( to ( cast ( it and ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (SBARQ (WHNP (WP what)) (SQ (MD 'd) (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VB do) (SBAR (IN for) (S (NP (DT that)) (VP (VBD did) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBP have) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB cast) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VB and))))))))))))))))
What method did they employ to get that done; was the thing poured into a mold or pressed?
( ( What method ) ( ( ( did they ) ( employ ( to ( get ( ( ( that done ) ; ) ( was ( ( the thing ) ( ( ( poured ( into ( a mold ) ) ) or ) pressed ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ? ) )
(ROOT (SBARQ (WHNP (WDT What) (NN method)) (SQ (VBD did) (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VB employ) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB get) (NP (NP (DT that)) (VP (VBN done)) (: ;) (SBAR (S (VP (VBD was) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN thing)) (VP (VP (VBN poured) (PP (IN into) (NP (DT a) (NN mold)))) (CC or) (VP (VBN pressed))))))))))))) (. ?)))
telephone
1neutral
Premise: what'd they do for that did they have to cast it and <sep> Hypothesis: What method did they employ to get that done; was the thing poured into a mold or pressed?
10,956
10956c
um yeah but you need to continue to read so you you can people learn to read you know
( um ( yeah ( ( ( ( but ( you ( need ( to ( continue ( to ( ( read so ) you ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( you can ) ) ( people ( learn ( to read ) ) ) ) ( you know ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NN um)) (VP (VBP yeah) (S (S (CC but) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP need) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB continue) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB read) (ADVP (RB so)) (NP (PRP you)))))))))) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (MD can))) (S (NP (NNS people)) (VP (VBP learn) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB read)))))) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know)))))))
Nobody needs to read at all.
( Nobody ( ( needs ( to ( read ( at all ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NN Nobody)) (VP (VBZ needs) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB read) (ADVP (IN at) (DT all)))))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
Premise: um yeah but you need to continue to read so you you can people learn to read you know <sep> Hypothesis: Nobody needs to read at all.
83,647
83647c
Other distinctions are possible, such as bulk and nonbulk, but the speed distinction would seem to dominate.
( ( ( ( ( ( Other distinctions ) ( ( ( are possible ) , ) ( such ( as ( ( bulk and ) nonbulk ) ) ) ) ) , ) but ) ( ( the ( speed distinction ) ) ( would ( seem ( to dominate ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (JJ Other) (NNS distinctions)) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (JJ possible)) (, ,) (PP (JJ such) (PP (IN as) (NP (NN bulk) (CC and) (NN nonbulk)))))) (, ,) (CC but) (S (NP (DT the) (NN speed) (NN distinction)) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB seem) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB dominate))))))) (. .)))
Other distinctions are not possible,
( ( Other distinctions ) ( ( ( are not ) possible ) , ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (JJ Other) (NNS distinctions)) (VP (VBP are) (RB not) (ADJP (JJ possible))) (, ,)))
government
2contradiction
Premise: Other distinctions are possible, such as bulk and nonbulk, but the speed distinction would seem to dominate. <sep> Hypothesis: Other distinctions are not possible,
108,610
108610e
Youth is a failing only too easily outgrown.
( Youth ( ( is ( ( a failing ) ( ( only ( too easily ) ) outgrown ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Youth)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (DT a) (VBG failing)) (VP (ADVP (RB only) (RB too) (RB easily)) (VBN outgrown)))) (. .)))
The idea of youth is a fault that is overcome easily by growth.
( ( ( The idea ) ( of youth ) ) ( ( is ( ( a fault ) ( that ( is ( ( overcome easily ) ( by growth ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN idea)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN youth)))) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN fault)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBN overcome) (ADVP (RB easily)) (PP (IN by) (NP (NN growth))))))))) (. .)))
fiction
0entailment
Premise: Youth is a failing only too easily outgrown. <sep> Hypothesis: The idea of youth is a fault that is overcome easily by growth.
144,623
144623c
i i it's okay to watch people go out and break their legs but i'm not going to climb on a couple of pieces of wood and go racing down a slick mountain side i mean that's
( ( ( i i ) ( ( ( it ( 's ( okay ( to ( ( ( watch ( people ( go out ) ) ) and ) ( break ( their legs ) ) ) ) ) ) ) but ) ( i ( ( 'm not ) ( going ( to ( ( ( ( climb ( on ( ( a couple ) ( of ( pieces ( of wood ) ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( go ( ( racing down ) ( a ( slick ( mountain side ) ) ) ) ) ) i ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( mean ( that 's ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (FW i) (FW i)) (SBAR (S (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (ADJP (JJ okay) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VP (VB watch) (S (NP (NNS people)) (VP (VB go) (PRT (RP out))))) (CC and) (VP (VB break) (NP (PRP$ their) (NNS legs))))))))) (CC but) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP 'm) (RB not) (VP (VBG going) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VP (VB climb) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN couple)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNS pieces)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN wood)))))))) (CC and) (VP (VB go) (S (VP (VBG racing) (PRT (RP down)) (NP (DT a) (JJ slick) (NN mountain) (NN side))))) (NP (FW i))))))))))) (VP (VBP mean) (SBAR (IN that) (S (VP (VBZ 's)))))))
I would love to go mountain sliding, it's my life dream.
( ( I ( would ( love ( to ( go ( mountain sliding ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( it ( ( 's ( my ( life dream ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB love) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB go) (NP (NP (NN mountain)) (VP (VBG sliding))))))))) (, ,) (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (NP (PRP$ my) (NN life) (NN dream))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
Premise: i i it's okay to watch people go out and break their legs but i'm not going to climb on a couple of pieces of wood and go racing down a slick mountain side i mean that's <sep> Hypothesis: I would love to go mountain sliding, it's my life dream.
85,687
85687e
The fire burns, and it destroys.
( ( ( ( ( ( The fire ) burns ) , ) and ) ( it destroys ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (DT The) (NN fire)) (VP (VBZ burns))) (, ,) (CC and) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ destroys))) (. .)))
The fire destroyed it.
( ( The fire ) ( ( destroyed it ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN fire)) (VP (VBD destroyed) (NP (PRP it))) (. .)))
fiction
0entailment
Premise: The fire burns, and it destroys. <sep> Hypothesis: The fire destroyed it.
23,650
23650e
WRITE-OFF -An action to remove an amount from an entity's assets or financial resources.
( ( ( WRITE-OFF - ) ( An ( action ( to ( ( remove ( an amount ) ) ( from ( ( an ( entity 's ) ) ( ( assets or ) ( financial resources ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (NP (NP (NNP WRITE-OFF)) (: -) (NP (DT An) (NN action) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB remove) (NP (DT an) (NN amount)) (PP (IN from) (NP (NP (DT an) (NN entity) (POS 's)) (NX (NX (NNS assets)) (CC or) (NX (JJ financial) (NNS resources))))))))) (. .)))
Write offs are used to remove financial information.
( ( Write offs ) ( ( are ( used ( to ( remove ( financial information ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (JJ Write) (NNS offs)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBN used) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB remove) (NP (JJ financial) (NN information))))))) (. .)))
government
0entailment
Premise: WRITE-OFF -An action to remove an amount from an entity's assets or financial resources. <sep> Hypothesis: Write offs are used to remove financial information.
141,082
141082e
From a population of 20,000 it has grown into a metropolis of 2.5 million, with tightly clustered skyscrapers and some of China's highest groseng industries.
( ( From ( ( a population ) ( of 20,000 ) ) ) ( it ( ( has ( ( ( grown ( into ( ( a metropolis ) ( of ( 2.5 million ) ) ) ) ) , ) ( with ( ( ( ( tightly clustered ) skyscrapers ) and ) ( some ( of ( ( China 's ) ( highest ( groseng industries ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN From) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN population)) (PP (IN of) (NP (CD 20,000))))) (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN grown) (PP (IN into) (NP (NP (DT a) (NNS metropolis)) (PP (IN of) (NP (QP (CD 2.5) (CD million)))))) (, ,) (PP (IN with) (NP (NP (ADJP (RB tightly) (VBN clustered)) (NNS skyscrapers)) (CC and) (NP (NP (DT some)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNP China) (POS 's)) (JJS highest) (VBG groseng) (NNS industries)))))))) (. .)))
Its population has increased by over two million.
( ( Its population ) ( ( has ( increased ( by ( over ( two million ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP$ Its) (NN population)) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN increased) (PP (IN by) (NP (QP (RB over) (CD two) (CD million)))))) (. .)))
travel
0entailment
Premise: From a population of 20,000 it has grown into a metropolis of 2.5 million, with tightly clustered skyscrapers and some of China's highest groseng industries. <sep> Hypothesis: Its population has increased by over two million.
106,962
106962n
The titles alone--Mars Probe Finds Kittens and Schredinger's Cat (which covers Sacajawea's Rain Bonnet and Wittgenstein's Banana)--display Martin's knack for goofy parody.
( ( ( ( ( ( The titles ) alone ) -- ) ( ( ( Mars ( Probe ( Finds Kittens ) ) ) and ) ( ( ( Schredinger 's ) Cat ) ( -LRB- ( ( which ( covers ( ( ( ( Sacajawea 's ) ( Rain Bonnet ) ) and ) ( ( Wittgenstein 's ) Banana ) ) ) ) -RRB- ) ) ) ) ) -- ) ( ( display ( ( ( Martin 's ) knack ) ( for ( goofy parody ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NP (DT The) (NNS titles)) (ADVP (RB alone))) (: --) (NP (NP (NNP Mars) (NNP Probe) (NNPS Finds) (NNP Kittens)) (CC and) (NP (NP (NP (NNP Schredinger) (POS 's)) (NN Cat)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT which)) (S (VP (VBZ covers) (NP (NP (NP (NNP Sacajawea) (POS 's)) (NN Rain) (NN Bonnet)) (CC and) (NP (NP (NNP Wittgenstein) (POS 's)) (NNP Banana)))))) (-RRB- -RRB-)))) (: --)) (VP (VBP display) (NP (NP (NP (NNP Martin) (POS 's)) (NN knack)) (PP (IN for) (NP (JJ goofy) (NN parody))))) (. .)))
Martin's works are enjoyed by many.
( ( ( Martin 's ) works ) ( ( are ( enjoyed ( by many ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNP Martin) (POS 's)) (NNS works)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBN enjoyed) (PP (IN by) (NP (JJ many))))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
Premise: The titles alone--Mars Probe Finds Kittens and Schredinger's Cat (which covers Sacajawea's Rain Bonnet and Wittgenstein's Banana)--display Martin's knack for goofy parody. <sep> Hypothesis: Martin's works are enjoyed by many.
18,010
18010e
and i talked to someone about the uh the uh education system i forget exactly what the focus was on that one but that was fairly interesting and i've talked to somebody about credit card usage
( and ( i ( ( talked ( to ( someone ( about ( the uh ) ) ) ) ) ( ( the ( uh ( education system ) ) ) ( ( ( i ( forget ( ( ( ( exactly what ) ( ( the focus ) ( was ( on ( that one ) ) ) ) ) but ) ( that ( was ( fairly interesting ) ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( i ( 've ( talked ( to ( somebody ( about ( credit ( card usage ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (FRAG (CC and) (NP (NP (FW i)) (SBAR (S (VP (VBD talked) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (NN someone)) (PP (IN about) (NP (DT the) (NN uh))))) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ uh) (NN education) (NN system)) (SBAR (S (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP forget) (SBAR (SBAR (WHADJP (RB exactly) (WP what)) (S (NP (DT the) (NN focus)) (VP (VBD was) (PP (IN on) (NP (DT that) (NN one)))))) (CC but) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (RB fairly) (JJ interesting)))))))) (CC and) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP 've) (VP (VBN talked) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (NN somebody)) (PP (IN about) (NP (NN credit) (NN card) (NN usage)))))))))))))))))
I talked to someone about the education system and credit card usage.
( I ( ( ( talked ( to someone ) ) ( about ( the ( education ( system ( and ( credit ( card usage ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD talked) (PP (TO to) (NP (NN someone))) (PP (IN about) (NP (DT the) (NN education) (NN system) (CC and) (NN credit) (NN card) (NN usage)))) (. .)))
telephone
0entailment
Premise: and i talked to someone about the uh the uh education system i forget exactly what the focus was on that one but that was fairly interesting and i've talked to somebody about credit card usage <sep> Hypothesis: I talked to someone about the education system and credit card usage.
106,262
106262c
so let's see what well what kind of music do you not like
( so ( ( let ( 's ( ( see what ) well ) ) ) ( ( ( what kind ) ( of music ) ) ( do ( you ( not like ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (SINV (ADVP (RB so)) (VP (VBD let) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP 's)) (VP (VBP see) (NP (WP what)) (ADVP (RB well)))))) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what) (NN kind) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN music)))) (S (VP (VBP do) (S (NP (PRP you)) (RB not) (VP (VB like))))))))
Tell me about all the music you love listening to
( ( Tell me ) ( about ( ( all ( the music ) ) ( you ( love ( listening to ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (VP (VB Tell) (NP (PRP me)) (PP (IN about) (NP (NP (PDT all) (DT the) (NN music)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP love) (S (VP (VBG listening) (PP (TO to))))))))))))
telephone
2contradiction
Premise: so let's see what well what kind of music do you not like <sep> Hypothesis: Tell me about all the music you love listening to
139,449
139449c
They--hey, what's that?" He was looking up, and Hanson followed his gaze.
( ( ( ( ( They ( -- ( ( ( hey , ) ( what ( ( ( 's that ) ? ) '' ) ) ) ( He ( was ( looking up ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) and ) ( Hanson ( followed ( his gaze ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (PRP They)) (: --) (S (VP (VBP hey) (, ,) (SBARQ (WHNP (WP what)) (SQ (VBZ 's) (NP (DT that))) (. ?) ('' '')))) (NP (PRP He)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBG looking) (PRT (RP up))))) (, ,) (CC and) (S (NP (NNP Hanson)) (VP (VBD followed) (NP (PRP$ his) (NN gaze)))) (. .)))
He looked down at the ground, while Hanson looked up.
( He ( ( ( ( ( looked down ) ( at ( the ground ) ) ) , ) ( while ( Hanson ( looked up ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP He)) (VP (VBD looked) (PRT (RP down)) (PP (IN at) (NP (DT the) (NN ground))) (, ,) (SBAR (IN while) (S (NP (NNP Hanson)) (VP (VBD looked) (PRT (RP up)))))) (. .)))
fiction
2contradiction
Premise: They--hey, what's that?" He was looking up, and Hanson followed his gaze. <sep> Hypothesis: He looked down at the ground, while Hanson looked up.
92,621
92621c
Or does cold iron ruin your conjuring here? Sather Karf snorted in obvious disgust, but Bork only grinned.
( Or ( ( ( does ( cold iron ) ) ( ruin ( ( ( ( ( ( your conjuring ) ( here ? ) ) ( ( Sather Karf ) ( snorted ( in ( obvious disgust ) ) ) ) ) , ) but ) ( Bork ( only grinned ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (SQ (CC Or) (VBZ does) (NP (JJ cold) (NN iron)) (VP (VB ruin) (S (S (FRAG (NP (PRP$ your) (NN conjuring)) (ADVP (RB here)) (. ?)) (NP (NNP Sather) (NNP Karf)) (VP (VBD snorted) (PP (IN in) (NP (JJ obvious) (NN disgust))))) (, ,) (CC but) (S (NP (NNP Bork)) (ADVP (RB only)) (VP (VBD grinned))))) (. .)))
Sather Karf has no questions regarding cold iron and conjuring.
( ( Sather Karf ) ( ( has ( ( no questions ) ( regarding ( cold ( ( iron and ) conjuring ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Sather) (NNP Karf)) (VP (VBZ has) (NP (NP (DT no) (NNS questions)) (PP (VBG regarding) (NP (JJ cold) (NN iron) (CC and) (NN conjuring))))) (. .)))
fiction
2contradiction
Premise: Or does cold iron ruin your conjuring here? Sather Karf snorted in obvious disgust, but Bork only grinned. <sep> Hypothesis: Sather Karf has no questions regarding cold iron and conjuring.
122,436
122436c
5 million Americans living in households with an income below the poverty level.
( ( ( 5 million ) Americans ) ( ( ( living ( in ( households ( with ( an income ) ) ) ) ) ( below ( the ( poverty level ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (QP (CD 5) (CD million)) (NNPS Americans)) (VP (VBD living) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (NNS households)) (PP (IN with) (NP (DT an) (NN income))))) (PP (IN below) (NP (DT the) (NN poverty) (NN level)))) (. .)))
5 millun Americans make too much money
( ( 5 ( millun Americans ) ) ( make ( ( too much ) money ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (CD 5) (JJ millun) (NNS Americans)) (VP (VBP make) (NP (ADJP (RB too) (JJ much)) (NN money)))))
government
2contradiction
Premise: 5 million Americans living in households with an income below the poverty level. <sep> Hypothesis: 5 millun Americans make too much money
66,982
66982c
These Year 2000 conversion efforts are often conducted under severe time constraints that, without adequate management attention, could result in a weakening of controls over the integrity of data and programs and over the confidentiality of sensitive data.
( ( These ( Year ( 2000 ( conversion efforts ) ) ) ) ( ( ( are often ) ( conducted ( under ( ( severe ( time constraints ) ) ( that ( , ( ( without ( adequate ( management attention ) ) ) ( , ( could ( result ( ( ( in ( ( a weakening ) ( of ( controls ( over ( ( the integrity ) ( of ( ( data and ) programs ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( over ( ( the confidentiality ) ( of ( sensitive data ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT These) (NN Year) (CD 2000) (NN conversion) (NNS efforts)) (VP (VBP are) (ADVP (RB often)) (VP (VBN conducted) (PP (IN under) (NP (NP (JJ severe) (NN time) (NNS constraints)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (, ,) (PP (IN without) (NP (JJ adequate) (NN management) (NN attention))) (, ,) (VP (MD could) (VP (VB result) (PP (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN weakening)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNS controls)) (PP (IN over) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN integrity)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNS data) (CC and) (NNS programs))))))))) (CC and) (PP (IN over) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN confidentiality)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ sensitive) (NNS data)))))))))))))) (. .)))
The severe time constraints on the Year 2000 conversion efforts should have absolutely no effect on the confidentiality of sensitive data.
( ( ( The ( severe ( time constraints ) ) ) ( on ( the ( Year ( 2000 ( conversion efforts ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( should ( have ( ( absolutely ( no effect ) ) ( on ( ( the confidentiality ) ( of ( sensitive data ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (JJ severe) (NN time) (NNS constraints)) (PP (IN on) (NP (DT the) (NN Year) (CD 2000) (NN conversion) (NNS efforts)))) (VP (MD should) (VP (VB have) (NP (NP (RB absolutely) (DT no) (NN effect)) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN confidentiality)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ sensitive) (NNS data)))))))) (. .)))
government
2contradiction
Premise: These Year 2000 conversion efforts are often conducted under severe time constraints that, without adequate management attention, could result in a weakening of controls over the integrity of data and programs and over the confidentiality of sensitive data. <sep> Hypothesis: The severe time constraints on the Year 2000 conversion efforts should have absolutely no effect on the confidentiality of sensitive data.