text
stringlengths 1
29.3k
⌀ | label
float64 0
1
|
---|---|
"
Your submission at Articles for creation
Lauren Santo Domingo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Howdy! " | 0 |
I can check my e-mail on another computer, but my ability to do so is limited to a few hours of the day. Send the instructions if you want, but I'm not making any guarantees I'll be able to figure it out, or willing to employ the brainpower necessary to figure it out. I wish you'd just respond forthrightly to what I've been asking you. 11:46, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC) | 0 |
"
Hehe I'm still blocked, so I had to reply here ) Jaranda, I just really want you to know that I wasn't stalking you or anything like that... I really wasn't trying to harass you. It was lack of judgment on my part. Perhaps I should've backed off... but I still think it was unfair. I mean after the edit to... well, I can't remember the page, the one after Eric Gagne, I was warned by another user not to do what I was doing (even though I wasn't intentionally). I went to respond to him, and I saw I was blocked. I'm not saying that what I was doing was right, but I don't think I should've been blocked if I didn't do anything wrong after I was warned. If I continued, then of course I would be blocked and I'd agree with that, but the way it was I don't think should've resulted in a block.
As far as becoming a future admin, I've pondered in the past if I'd be willing to go through that at some point in the future... and I'm really not sure if I'd want to. It would be an honor if I were an admin, but that's a lot of responsibility and I'm not sure that I'm the right person for that. And with my new philosophy (I explained it in my past post) I'd have to take more responsibility than, at this point of my editing career, I'm willing to take. Much later in the future, I might change my opinion. But I've gotten into several disputes in the past and I'm trying to change my entire philosophy to negate all the problems I've caused in the past. Having been blocked for the first time ever, ironically during the time that my friend was blocked, adminship isn't something that I'm going to even consider about considering about considering at this time. But perhaps some mentoring would help me become a better editor, and I wouldn't mind any assistance should you wish to provide some for me, Jaranda. Thank you very much. ''''''(talk) " | 0 |
, as I promised here is a brief discussion of the different types of distillation used in the hydrocarbon processing industries that I am very familiar with ... i.e., oil refineries, petrochemical plants, natural gas processing plants (extracting natural gas liquids known as NGL's), and other hydrocarbon processing industries. Those industries probably have perhaps 80% or more of the industrial distillation columns in existence.
Other industries such as the pharmaceutical industry, the alcohol distilling industry and the fine chemicals industry also use quite a bit of distillation, but I am not familiar with those industries.
Major Industrial Distillation Types: The two primary types of industrial distillations are Continuous Fractionation or (Continuous Distillation) and Batch Distillation. The industrial Continuous Fractionation distillation towers are typified by the large, vertical, cylindrical columns as can be seen in the oil refinery photograph in the Fractional distillation article. Please note that by continuous, I mean 24 hours a day for 1 to 3 years before being temporarily shut down for maintenance ... and we are talking about towers with diameters ranging from about 65 centimeters to 6 meters and heights ranging from about 6 meters to 60 meters or more.
There are many subsets of the Continuous Fractionation primary distillation type, such as:
Fractional distillation
Vacuum distillation
Azeotropic distillation
Extractive distillation
Steam distillation
The above subsets would be of approximately the same size range is the primary Continuous Fractionation towers. The vacuum towers require reinforcement (provided by a number of steel beams encircling the tower exteriors) so that they can withstand the difference in pressure between the exterior atmospheric pressure and the interior vacuum.
As for the vapor-liquid contacting trays or plates used in industrial distillation towers, it is virtually impossible to explain bubble-cap or valve trays (or sheet steel structural packing) without drawings or photographs. We need someone who could make such drawings. We also need someone who can make a drawing of a typical kettle-type reboiler commonly used as the heat input to a distillation tower (although there are other types of reboilers such as fired furnaces, horizontal or vertical heat exchangers, bayonet heat exchangers, etc.).
Finally, if you look at the the simple sketch that I made of a typical fractionation tower overhead system in the Fractional distillation article, that sketch needs to be made longer so that it shows the feedstream entry (at about the center height of the tower), and the bottoms exiting the tower and entering the kettle reboiler .... with the final liquid bottoms product leaving the kettle reboiler and the reboiled vapor returning from the kettle to the tower. - | 0 |
", 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Avoid Greatest Story like the plague!! Read the reviews ! I consider Max Van Sydow to be a very respectable actor but it's almost like they sedated him, took his soul and left him with one expression, he's like a zombie as Jesus. The film had me yawning all the way through and I genuinely had to check myself several times from shutting off for a kip! Never a bright moment, nothing to lift the mood, even the silly cameos in it. It's not that the film, the scenery or whatever is bog standard or dreadful, but its the way the scene are compiled and the lifelessness of the actors in it which make it exceedingly dull and uninspiring to watch. David Lean was apparently an uncredited assistant director on it which I find hard to believe. Uncredited perhaps because of sheer embarrassment with the result. I'm not sure how anything in which Lean so much as touched ended up that dull... I just saw Treasure Island (1972 film). Welles was perfect casting as Long John! Repulsion and Barry Lydon I'm planning on watching tomorrow. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:23" | 0 |
hey we are def hangin out noww!!! later!! | 0 |
I don't understand why we have a screenshot of AP's GUI but not UB. Can someone remedy this? | 0 |
Hello! Welcome to wikipedia, great work on the Legend of Zelda items! I'm going to be moving all your work into the article: The_Legend_of_Zelda:_Ocarina_of_Time_weapons_and_items just to its all in one place and easy to read ). I hope you continue your great work, you seem to have been missing for a week now (. I hope you'll help me move all your work to the new area, see you. 08:38, 2 Aug 2004 (UTC) | 0 |
"
2001–02: I'm Serious
T.I. released his debut album, I'm Serious, in October 2001 through Arista Records.Soren Baker (May 12, 2005). ""Taking the street route back"" Los Angeles Times Retrieved on 2009. The album spawned the eponymous single, which featured Jamaican reggae entertainer Beenie Man. His debut single, ""I'm Serious,"" was released on June 26, 2001. The single received little airplay and failed to chart. The album featured guest appearances from Pharrell Williams of The Neptunes (who called him ""the Jay-Z of the South""),(December 21, 2004). Vibe Cover Story: T.I. – King of the South? Vibe. Retrieved October 9, 2008. Jazze Pha, Too Short, Bone Crusher, Lil Jon, Pastor Troy, YoungBloodZ and his southern hip hop group P$C. The album included production from The Neptunes, DJ Toomp, Madvac, and The Grand Hustle Team. Despite the album's guests appearances and production team, the album peaked at number 98 and only sold 163,000 copies in the United States. Critics pointed to the fact that many of the tracks sounded the same and that a few were blatant rip-offs.Jon Azpiri (2001-10-09). ""T.I. I'm Serious"" Retrieved on June 21, 2009. Other critics commented saying, ""T.I. claims to be the king of the South, but fails to show and prove. He does, however, have potential. If his talent ever matches his confidence, he may be headed for stardom."""" T.I. ""I'm Serious"" Album Review"" Retrieved on June 21, 2009." | 0 |
This page is not neutral. The bands need links. This page needs a lot of work. | 0 |
Congratulations, and do let me know if I can ever be of assistance. ++: t/c | 0 |
":Clayc, that's not a list of evolutionary biologists who dispute evolution, nor of ones who dispute it for scientific (as opposed to religious) reasons; according to the website you provided, it's a list of ""Creationists holding DOCTORATES IN SCIENCE"". Are you arguing that was should mention that a number of scientists dissent from evolution in the lead section of Evolution because creationists aren't banned from getting doctorates? That's rather silly indeed.
Creationism is a personal religious belief; it has nothing to do with science. There is no scientific evidence for creationism, and no aspect of creationism has never been supported or verified in any paper submitted to a peer-reviewed scientific paper. The problem here isn't that you're trying to dispute evolution by linking to a Christian website (after all, Christians can do science too); rather, it's that you're trying to dispute evolution by citing people who hold a certain religious belief. Creationism has no more relevance to the field of biology than Mormonism or Hinduism or Trinitarianism does. It is scientifically (and biologically) unremarkable that some people reject scientific facts for religious reasons, and creationism is a religious movement, based on the Book of Genesis in the Bible, not on scientific observations. If you think that the Book of Genesis (or any religious movement based on it) is science, you gravely misunderstand the meaning of ""science"".
Also, that's an amazingly short list, considering how many millions of people there are with doctorates.. And how many people on that list are actually biologists?
Also, a ""criticisms"" section is a bad idea, though a related article is currently under construction: Objections to evolution. When it's finished, it should satisfy your desire that this encyclopedic topic be covered. It's not a scientific topic, however, but a social and historical one, so it will have little mention in the top-level article, Evolution. -
" | 0 |
"
{fact} tags
(talk) " | 0 |
Thanks for the reminder! I've been overseas and frankly just didn't realise the time. I have got the article largely written up in Word. I am currently very busy on two-three articles for clients (I am freelance journalist) but I'll be ready by June 5 and will comply!
Thanks again vitéz | 0 |
"I have just posted a talkback on his page that will direct him to your page. My experience with tells me that he normally accesses Wikipedia in the evenings. Caelestis
" | 0 |
"
File:Modnation-racers-roadtrip-logo.jpeg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Modnation-racers-roadtrip-logo.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Chimpanzee | Ta | Co " | 0 |
"
It's not a big deal. ""Reportedly"" is fine. " | 0 |
"
""Palestinian"" in title should be changed to ""Gaza inhabitants""
Not everybody in Gaza is Palestinian. So I guess there were casualties that are not Palestinian. " | 0 |
You used false and misleading edit summaries more than once which shows a WP:BATTLEGROUND mentality on your part. This summary claims that you reported vandalism so it is immaterial whether you had or not. In this one you claim that there was consensus on the talk page for your edit when there clearly wasn't AND you claim that you notified an admin which is also a false statement. These are not the actions of someone acting in good faith and they clearly justify the notice on your talk page. |Talk | 0 |
revert wars and vandalism
Please take a look at Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR#User:Andrew_Alexander and Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Repeated_wholesale_removal_of_info_from_St._Volodymyr.27s_Cathedral. This attack of Ukrainian nationalist is getting on the nerves. | 0 |
thanks for your help with the translation]
Dear friend:
thank you very much for translating into chinese the entry Carles Fages de Climent.
Sincerely
69.19.14.35 | 0 |
The order of the rows is defined at the WikiProject. debate the change there. Right now, you're editing just to war. @ 04:38, 2005 Jan 20 (UTC) | 0 |
Completely disagree. The company is no longer in existence. That plus it's not more of a merger than it is both a merger and a complete rebranding. The page should not be split. | 0 |
"
I just checked the article on matter and the word ""matter"" itself does not have a rigorous, universally-accepted definition. Until physicists sort out the semantics, ""dark matter"" can be as real as ""ordinary matter"". " | 0 |
"
the root [`bd] in aramaic does not mean ""work"" as the article states, nor does [`sh] in bib. hebrew mean ""work"". The point was the switch from the Bib. heb in which [`bd] meant ""work"" and [`sh] meant ""do"" or ""make"" to the aramaic in which [`bd] means ""do, make"" and [`sh] is not used." | 0 |
"
Wow, nice effort. An inline tag or two won't fail a DYK nomination, but if we get something working well, I could add it in with the alert color less striking. My article tag code doesn't notice how many tags there are; it just sees if the tag exists or not. With inline tags, the code should output how many there are, especially since one or two is nothing to worry about. That could be done by replacing the for loop at the end with
TABfor (var i=0; i < inlinetaglist.length; i++) {
TABTABif (html.innerHTML.indexOf(inlinetaglist[i][0]) != -1) {
TABTABTABint tagIndex = html.innerHTML.indexOf(inlinetaglist[i][1]);
TABTABTABint tags = 0;
TABTABTABwhile (html.innerHTML.indexOf(inlinetaglist[i][0], tagIndex) != -1) {
TABTABTABTABtags++;
TABTABTABTABtagIndex = html.innerHTML.indexOf(inlinetaglist[i][0], tagIndex) + inlinetaglist[i][1].length;
TABTABTAB}
TABTABTABinlinetagsFound += ""Article has "" + tags + "" "" + inlinetagList[i][1] + "" inline tag(s). "";
TABTAB}
TAB}
" | 0 |
"40, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
Final Error
Why does the final say Angola vs Morocco? 86.45.94.227
LOL, welcome to wikipedia. .Alpaugh 21:" | 0 |
"
I have, many times, thank you, but at the time of the message above, there was no proof that anyone on that blog was an expert.— dαlus Contribs " | 0 |
"
As WP:OI says,
Original images created by a Wikipedian are not considered original research, so long as they do not illustrate or introduce unpublished ideas or arguments, the core reason behind the NOR policy.
The published information which is the basis for the annotation (i.e. the three letters/arrows) is explained on the image description page for the uncropped map and also in a footnote to the map's caption i.e.
Macmillan gives the steps in setting a blast, the location and circumstances of the accident, and the location of Gage's lodgings and Harlow's home and surgery..
Thoughts on this? As with the image links, I've put the map back so we (and others) can see what we're talking about.
A9 Proving a negative
This regards a recent edit to the passage
Macmillan's comprehensive survey of accounts of Gage (scientific and popular) found that they almost always distort and exaggerate his behavioral changes...
which removed the word comprehensive.
This is a delicate point and I want to come up with something everyone can live with. I think there are two questions here.
First, Was Macmillan's analysis indeed comprehensive? No one who's been participating have any doubt on that, but just in case, open the collapse list.
""first rate example of carefully done historical work"" (Psychological Reports, 2001)
""obstinately searched all possible sources. It seems very unlikely that anyone else could find a relevant piece not considered (Cortex, 2004)
""fastidious archaeological removal of the layers of legend"" (Lancet, 2001)
""Even some of the most prestigious academic researchers have disseminated erroneous information..."" (Neurosurgery Quarterly, 2002)
""The definitive account. One of those rare occasions on which one can truly say that further research is not necessary."" (Science, 2000)
""Macmillan scoured all the sources and commentaries on the case and as far as material regarding Gage is concerned this must be a definitive work. (History of the Human Sciences, 2007)
""Macmillan has shown that the record of how Phineas Gage’s character changed after the accident must be considered with caution..."" (New England Journal of Medicine"", 2004)
Second, Do we need to say the analysis was comprehensive? IMO I think we do, because it the analysis assserts a negative, which requires extraordinary research; just saying Macmillan found no mention omits that such extraordinary research was in fact done. (Two examples from the collapse box: ""Macmillan has obstinately searched all possible sources. It seems very unlikely that anyone else could find a relevant piece not considered""; ""The definitive account. One of those rare occasions on which one can truly say that further research is not necessary."")Without such a clear statement, we get edit summaries such as this one: .
Actually, there's a third question: Do we need to include a quotation (such as the ""further research is not necessary"" above) supporting the comprehensiveness? I don't think the reader needs that. I had put it in a footnote to the article recently only because another editor had questioned the comprehensiveness in other words, the quotation was there for editors, not readers, and this discussion can take its place.
So what I suggest is that the article say Macmillan's comprehensive analysis of accounts of Gage...'', where [97][98][99] cite to a few of the sources supporting the comprehensiveness, but without quoting them. What do you think?
" | 0 |
John, you did not cite what is acceptable, only what is not. The talk was given by the CEO of Trader Joe's. Why is that not a good enough source? I can re-write the words so they are mine, but facts are facts, so they cannot be modified too much. | 0 |
Roster
updated for 2008 missing numbers, need to confirm nationalities, will follow up. -
- C
- A | 0 |
REDIRECT Talk:Criticism of Dish Network | 0 |
Ok thank you. Ill just wait then for now and see what happens. | 0 |
"Snowleopard100 has edited a number of my comments on this page and infact has reverted a number of my comments also, i would suggest looking at the page history to confirm this. Pro
" | 0 |
Again, Odd nature reverts without discussing here amongst editors that are obviously working hard to get this article up to snuff. His only comments are attacks in his edit summaries. I personally find this appalling as well, and am hoping he will cease and desist soon. | 0 |
(UTC)
New External Link?
I would like to add this external link to the MH page: http://pie.med.utoronto.ca/MH
It's a good resource for clinicians and patients to learn about MH diagnosis and treatment, current research and has instructions for acute treatment and post-crisis treatment. The website was developed at Toronto General Hospital by the Malignant Hyperthermia Investigation Unit, so it is an authoritative source. Is this ok?
192.75.165.28 21:23, 8 March 2011 | 0 |
"
list of traps
Why is there not a list of all the Jigsaw traps? They could be catagorized by ""creator"" or by time. That seems encylopedic to me.
" | 0 |
"
Codex, p. 60
I will give the specific quote from the original text, which appears to be slightly changed []:
Τον ευλογημένον Ζαχαρίαν τον διεδέχθη ο Άγιος Γεννάδιος. Ύτος ήτο Σμυρναίος και αυτός αρχιδιάκονος του Ιωαννίνων, νέος τη ηλικία δεν είχεν ευχαρίστησιν να ακούη χριστιανούς να ομιλούν την αλβανική γλώσσαν. Φιλοδίκαιος όλως πολλά. Αρχιεράτευσε χρόνους είκοσι πέντε. Έπειτα μην υποφέρων την αλβανικήν γλώσσα εις τα χωρία της επαρχίας του ευχαρίστως έκαμε την παραίτησιν και αφήσας...
The text added in the article translates this entry as: In an ecclesiastical entry .... noted that some of the Christian Greek clergy had linguistic difficulties in administrating to their congregation, as Christian villagers living within the region of Delvinë were Albanian speaking.
It's hardly enough from the original text to conclude that the villagers were in general monolinguals, indeed it claims that Albanian speech was present and in significant numbers (it doesn't also conclude that all villages were Albanian speaking). Moreover, the fact that this produced linguistic difficulties in eclessiastical administration is something that only indirectly can be concluded, since the Codex mentions that ""a specific bishop, who came from Smyrna, found it not pleasant to hear his flock speaking Albanian, beacause of the Albanian speaking villages in his periphery, and resigned after 25 years of local service."" " | 0 |
":: Known by that term, it should be said, by the same British people who have, well, robbed, occupied, brutalised and oppressed the Irish people for centuries. The same people who also called the Irish barbarians, savages, and much more. And, furthermore, the British as they are commonly known today didn't even exist until, at best, the seventeenth century which coincidentally is when the term ""British Isles"" first entered the English language. This term is zealous jingoistic nomenclature if ever there was one, just another part of the myth-making exercises underpinning the creation of the British state. And there I was thinking the British were above such crass displays of nationalist tribalism! 86.42.99.141
" | 0 |
"
Help
What do you need help with? Talk | " | 0 |
Again - it is obvious what is happening. I've contacted Jimbo Wales, since it seems that the more I apply his principles, the more some here think that these principles are not real. I suggest that they are - including his guidelines on not biting newcomers which many of you purelu ignore outright - along with several principles. This block is unwarranted and not justified. | 0 |
Fair use rationale and summary added. | 0 |
Warden Joseph
Not to be lazy, but can someone source Warden Joseph's name being Martin. Here's the source:
http://www.primagames.com/games/batman-arkham-origins/strategy/batman-arkham-origins-walkthrough-find-black-mask
Thanks. - | 0 |
"
Bektashi
I suspect you start all your messages with offensive accusations like ""I suspect you're a sock puppet of so-and-so."" That being said, no, I'm not a sock-puppet of Aldiramal or whatever his name is. If he is copypasting verbatim, then it violates copy-right and is not in line with this being an encyclopedia article. However, inclusion of a jokes section with paragraph explaining the role of jokes, and including one joke, would seem fair. Happy editing to you too. " | 0 |
"
Pronunciation
How is Sirocco pronounced? The main article could be improved if there were a pronunciation guide. Is it pronounced the Italian way? Where the letters ""si"" correspond to the English 'sh' digraph?216.99.198.176 " | 0 |
"
Ted Kennedy death is hilarious?
He is confirmed to be dead. Someone wrote his death was described as ""hilarious""." | 0 |
"
Perseus missile - Description or Characteristics?
Your lack of English comprehension is appalling. Your edit summary reads, ""the section here describes the missile, not just lists its characteristics. Standard way of naming sections on similar articles. Also, i would be happy to compare GRE scores"". You are making this oh so easy for me, but for your benefit I will simplify things by hypothetically replacing the missile with a person. If I were to describe a person - perhaps on a police report - what would it entail? Height, weight, hair and eye colour, age? Yes, but I may also go on to describe the persons observable behavior, actions and tone of voice etc, to the best of my ability. This is a fairly standard example of what would fit a description.
The articles original sub heading - Characteristics - encompasses a more diverse and flexible approach to the subject, for example distinctive features or a distinguishing quality unique to that particular missile (or person!). It goes more in-depth, a wider representation of the subject. However, as defining Characteristics are very descriptive in nature, it is easy and common these days to make mistakes, just as you have clearly made the mistake of getting muddled with the correct use of description and characteristics (as represent by your edit summary).
Difference between a description and a characteristic?
Description: He is tall, 6ft 6.
Characteristic: It is his height of 6ft 6 that distinguishes him.
For a non native English speaker it can be difficult.
Brush up on your English skills before making a fool of your self, or edit Wikipedia in your own language. Ping me " | 0 |
Conservapedia
The problem is - Conservapedia tends to be 'very moreish' in finding seemingly strange articles to make comments on (g).
Could you put a redirect from my comment to 'Your Archives; in the article on The National Archives - and an appropriate entry/link on the 'List of Wikis' (as 'some people' will be interested)
J. | 0 |
"
Lakeview Baptist Church
Lakeview Baptist Church
I've added the """" template to the article Lakeview Baptist Church, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Lakeview Baptist Church. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. " | 0 |
Reply
What u mean by stub, also his last name is mispelled! I corrected! | 0 |
"BECAUSE IT ALREADY LISTS IT AS THE BANDS GENRE! DOESN'T THAT SEEM MORE IMPORTANT THAN AN ""ELEMENT IT DRAWS FROM""?
MY CAPS IS STUCK.
" | 0 |
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. (talk··Advise me) | 0 |
Wesola
See photo of Wesola bottle here. Is it not real? | 0 |
"
The National Register nomination, which is a bit scant, mentions that the ""addition of trailers and barracks type buildings after World War II has altered the surroundings and district exterior ..."" but goes no further. If I can find something about the relocations, I'll work that in. (talk) " | 0 |
Notices
Hi, I have seen on some vandals pages you make messages with Exclamation marks in triangles and blue circles. When I pressed Edit Page it came up with weird codes and stuff. Is there a way to do this quickly or does it have to be done manually? Thanks | 0 |
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did at User talk:Donner60, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 77.53.219.2 | 0 |
More description needed
How do the GunCons differ from other light guns? — | 0 |
I've just changed the article to a disambiguation page as I suspect there could be future arguments over articles/redirects - hopefully, this will preculde any such disagreements ! | 0 |
"
It appears as a vandalism, although she is an experienced user. '''''' talk " | 0 |
"
Utter nonsense showing exactly what is wrong with Wikipedia
This article reads like a press release, and uncritically accepts the claim that the CL is a ""civil rights"" organization whose primary purpose is fighting ""bigotry"", when in fact they attack anyone who criticizes any aspect of Catholicism no matter how politely or correctly, they actively proselytize for Catholicism as the one true religion, and their leader William Donohue, who is for all practical purposes their only member, has made numerous anti-Jewish statements. It is also a lie to say that the CL is a lay organization not controlled by the Church, when in fact their office is located within the Archdiocese of New York's headquarters and they work closely with the Archbishop to coordinate media strategies.
The NPOV and anti-libel policy on Wikipedia has become an ""accept anything everyone says without blinking an eye and don't criticize anyone on relevant grounds"" policy because none of the editors here actually know anything about the subjects of the articles. If someone who was not a fifteen-year-old anime-watching idiot could actually become an administrator around here, maybe we could see an article on the Catholic League actually discuss what the Catholic League is known for in American politics. Instead, we get nonsense criticism sections telling us things like what PETA thinks of Beyonce Knowles, while anything of actual relevance to the world today is declawed for fear of ""offending"" people who don't like the truth or for being sued for libel due to a poor understanding of the law.
" | 0 |
"
What harassment is not: ""Unfounded accusations of harassment may be considered a serious personal attack and dealt with accordingly."" " | 0 |
Since I own Deep Shag Records and all underlying content on the website, there are no copyright violations. Perhaps some copyright tags are mislabeled as I have had some difficulty in understanding some of the Wikipedia procedures. Any help in this matter would be appreciated. I have reversed your well intentioned, but incorrect changes. | 0 |
"::I am finding difficulty with the reasoning of people who
(1) support extending the ""troubles"" sanctions to Irish articles not related to the troubles (which I do not support, btw)
(2) but then when to restrict the extension to articles about Ireland only, as if the troubles in Ireland were unrelated to Britain!
At least Elonka is consistent in her approach.
" | 0 |
"
Exactly. If it was there you would have found it. I'm guessing there's some wrinke in the software. I see by the Wikipedia:Catalogue of CSS classes this function (listed as ""NavFrame"" in the classes section) is ""Used by the experimental Dynamic Navigation Bars code"". Experimental always makes me nervous! " | 0 |
The article The panic theory has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. | 0 |
That can be changed when its clarified as stated earlier.175.110.222.144 | 0 |
"
ReferenceBot – Xavier enc
Page: Armorial of the Communes of Nord-1 (A–C)
Diff: latest revision
Comment/question: Your bot notified me of a cite error. I believe the cite error was corrected.
" | 0 |
"
Alpha was absorbed by Wilma as shown here:http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hurricanes/archives/2005/h2005_alpha.html
The result was true. (talk✉) " | 0 |
"
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 79 " | 0 |
Really pleased you've got it to GA status, which you throughly deserve. I spent my childhood looking at the castle from my parent's garden and it is a really amazing building so it's great that you've given it an article to match. | 0 |
Outstanding! I never thought of it! | 0 |
Black Hawk Down - Appropriate Source?
I notice that the film Black Hawk Down is footnoted as a source (twice). I am not sure if a film is a reliable source for determining the stopping power of a bullet. Thoughts? | 0 |
Thanks Nev, much appreciated. That's what I call service, Happy New Year. | 0 |
"
I can second this one. Having worked in the print journalism industry, I can testify - gee, that's not ""original research"", is it? - that double-spacing is no longer required save for some local courts which require submitted documents have the double-spacing after punctuation marks. The irony here is that they require it because they're using older scanners and OCR software, and this helps reduce scanning interpretation error, and the documents produced themselves are *stripped* of the extra space! " | 0 |
What, Nik? Hello? ...I would still like to hear an answer to my question if anyone out there has any integity and intelligence. Is insight and perceptivity BANNED on Wikipedia? Must everything be banal and bland?? | 0 |
Channel 4
On channel four, the part where Marge decides to keep the gun was cut | 0 |
Oh, but you're happy to do so when it's in defense of your boyfriend Aquaman. | 0 |
"
As I showed here a few months ago, Ireland was most definitely seen as part of the ""new world"" by British colonialists in the late 16th and early 17th centuries. More research has been done on this aspect of early modern Irish history than perhaps any other area (especially the analogies between English treatment of the native Irish and the native Americans). In particular this ""new world"" has been extensively substantiated in the works of Nicholas Canny and D.B. Quinn. " | 0 |
Scheibe
Please refrain from changing music genres, as you did to Scheiße, without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive and you may be blocked. 20:40, 15 January 2013 | 0 |
Anything else is OR. (Talk) | 0 |
That would make it the flag of the team using it, not the flag of the country. As with all national flag articles, they are about national flags, which the UB is not any more. | 0 |
In English, we do traditionally say the Ukraine, the Crimea, the Peloponnesus, the Sudan, the Lebanon, the Barbados, the Wash, the Skagerrak, the Kattegat.
Just off the top of my head, | 0 |
hey:
Media:Example.oggInsert non-formatted text here
Insert non-formatted text hereMedia:Example.ogg
Headline text
Media:Example.oggInsert non-formatted text here Media:Example.oggMedia:Example.oggMedia:Example.oggInsert non-formatted text hereInsert non-formatted text here | 0 |
"
Re: ok, I already marked more of Big Brother and Farmer participants before as {{db-bio}} some of them are already deleted but I tagged the rest with {{prod}} instad of {{db-bio}} (like Elita Löfblad). The source of dbs come from Big Brother (Sweden and Norway). ≈talk≈ " | 0 |
You've just described Fahrenheit 9/11. Which is called a documentary.
Aye. | 0 |
You have illegitimately and illegally blocked me without giving any kind of evidence. The burden of evidence is clearly on your side and you should fulfill this duty as soon as possible, if you do not want to see yourself lose your position inside Wikipedia for unlawfully gag&muzzle; an innocent user! | 0 |
Carol, please try to keep your POV out of these discussions. There is nothing wrong with the intolerance Hoppe contemplates in libertarian covenant communities. All of it is implied by the non-aggression principle. | 0 |
"
{| class=""messagebox standard-talk"" style=""padding:11px; width:70%; text-align:left;""|align=""center""
| || width=""100%""|This ip''' has been blocked indefinitely as an open proxy See [ block log]." | 0 |
Please do not add commercial links or links to your own private websites to Wikipedia, as you did in Shi'a Islam. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links as long as the content abides by our policies and guidelines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. | 0 |
Please acknowledge. (talk) (contribs) | 0 |
"
Neither my edit summary nor my talk page text (subsequently amended) was intended as a bite, it was intended as humour. However I apologise if it has offended.
None of us expect the articles to be perfect initially, that's why we review them and raise the issues on the talk page, so that we can improve the article - sometimes quickly (it might be a trivial matter that someone with local knowledge can resolve quickly), sometimes it might take a while (a response on the talk page says ""we don't know, and it might take some time to find out""). " | 0 |
"
Dog Greek
The main article is a lot of pseudo-scientific dog-Greek from Richard Dawkins, with nothing new. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.4.21
Dawkins's new science is opposed to ""chastity"" and ""God"". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.4.21 " | 0 |
"
If you are familiar with MIS (the church's membership database), you'll notice that when they reach the age of eight they are removed from membership roles if they are not baptized within their eighth year. However, if their parents are still members, their names are kept in MIS (not as members, but part of a family who has a member) with the parents until they are 18. Non-Baptized spouses are also included. If I remember the designations for these are ""Child of Record,"" (0-8) ""Unbaptized"" (9-18) and ""Non-Member"" (18+). They used to have an ""unaccountable"" designation as well for those with disabilities who don't need to be baptized, although I've not seen it recently (no ""unaccountables"" in my last ward that I'm aware of), and they'd also be included with ""Child of record"" in my opinion. Church statistics are more accurate than most other denomination's ""estimates"" and the computer system designates and distinguishes quite easily. The Catholic Church for example bases theirs on country statistics - if a country is deemed ""catholic"" then 90+ percent is counted as being catholic - even if they are not, or if they have had their names removed. See this recent thread and resulting discussion. - " | 0 |
REDIRECT Talk:On Fire (Law & Order: Criminal Intent) | 0 |
Nomination for Adminship
I nominated you. See here: Wikipedia:Requests for adminship 15:18, Mar 5, 2004 (UTC) | 0 |
I repet: adijapan delete bibiography, external links and native name!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ( ) | 0 |
Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Candle. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - Boy | 0 |
Most of your edits in Antisemitism have been reverted by Roscelese
Roscelese reverted your edits on Antisemitism. He or she (not sure who she/he started as) is a radical militant left wing extremist who constantly pushes that extreme agenda on wiki. She has many cohorts and they are easy to spot by their edits on similar subjects of similar natures. The neutrality of Wikipedia is only a far fetched dream as it consistently leans far left. Editors on the government dime who spend their lives constantly on wiki promoting their radical agendas have hijacked any notion of neutrality. She does all kinds gaming the system and even outright violations but because they are leftist nothing serious is done to Roscelese or others in that camp. Wiki is done as a neutral agenda encyclopedia. The word is being spread like wildfire. In a few years wikis relevance will be negligible because of editors like Roscelese. | 0 |
"
Old discussions found in the archive.
totally irrelevant but
totally irrelevant but-
i love gilmore girls, but she is sort of a terrible actress when it comes to doing scenes that require any sort of skill. has she ever been schooled in acting? - 85.178.35.74
""Bledel studied at the Page Parkes Center for Modeling and Acting and majored in film at New York University's Tisch School of the Arts for one year before landing the role of Rory in Gilmore Girls."" I assume this means she took some acting classes, but I'm not absolutely sure. - 11:44, 18 April 2007 (UTC" | 0 |
"
Science fiction Western has a pretty narrow definition, which Farscape doesn't fit:
""A science fiction Western is a work of fiction which has elements of science fiction in a Western setting.""
Maybe you mean Space Western? " | 0 |