Datasets:
annotations_creators:
- no-annotation
language_creators:
- found
language:
- en
license:
- unknown
multilinguality:
- monolingual
size_categories:
- 1K<n<10K
source_datasets:
- original
task_categories:
- summarization
task_ids: []
paperswithcode_id: scitldr
pretty_name: SciTLDR
tags:
- scientific-documents-summarization
dataset_info:
- config_name: Abstract
features:
- name: source
sequence: string
- name: source_labels
sequence:
class_label:
names:
'0': non-oracle
'1': oracle
- name: rouge_scores
sequence: float32
- name: paper_id
dtype: string
- name: target
sequence: string
splits:
- name: train
num_bytes: 2738065
num_examples: 1992
- name: test
num_bytes: 1073656
num_examples: 618
- name: validation
num_bytes: 994876
num_examples: 619
download_size: 5483987
dataset_size: 4806597
- config_name: AIC
features:
- name: source
sequence: string
- name: source_labels
sequence:
class_label:
names:
'0': 0
'1': 1
- name: rouge_scores
sequence: float32
- name: paper_id
dtype: string
- name: ic
dtype: bool_
- name: target
sequence: string
splits:
- name: train
num_bytes: 14473822
num_examples: 1992
- name: test
num_bytes: 4822026
num_examples: 618
- name: validation
num_bytes: 4476237
num_examples: 619
download_size: 25545108
dataset_size: 23772085
- config_name: FullText
features:
- name: source
sequence: string
- name: source_labels
sequence:
class_label:
names:
'0': non-oracle
'1': oracle
- name: rouge_scores
sequence: float32
- name: paper_id
dtype: string
- name: target
sequence: string
splits:
- name: train
num_bytes: 66917363
num_examples: 1992
- name: test
num_bytes: 20182554
num_examples: 618
- name: validation
num_bytes: 18790651
num_examples: 619
download_size: 110904552
dataset_size: 105890568
Dataset Card for SciTLDR
Table of Contents
- Dataset Description
- Dataset Structure
- Dataset Creation
- Considerations for Using the Data
- Additional Information
Dataset Description
- Homepage: https://github.com/allenai/scitldr
- Repository: https://github.com/allenai/scitldr
- Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.15011
- Leaderboard:
- Point of Contact: {isabelc,kylel,armanc,danw}@allenai.org
Dataset Summary
SciTLDR
: Extreme Summarization of Scientific Documents
SciTLDR is a new multi-target dataset of 5.4K TLDRs over 3.2K papers. SciTLDR contains both author-written and expert-derived TLDRs, where the latter are collected using a novel annotation protocol that produces high-quality summaries while minimizing annotation burden.
Supported Tasks and Leaderboards
summarization
Languages
English
Dataset Structure
SciTLDR is split in to a 60/20/20 train/dev/test split. For each file, each line is a json, formatted as follows
{
"source":[
"sent0",
"sent1",
"sent2",
...
],
"source_labels":[binary list in which 1 is the oracle sentence],
"rouge_scores":[precomputed rouge-1 scores],
"paper_id":"PAPER-ID",
"target":[
"author-tldr",
"pr-tldr0",
"pr-tldr1",
...
],
"title":"TITLE"
}
The keys rouge_scores
and source_labels
are not necessary for any code to run, precomputed Rouge scores are provided for future research.
Data Instances
{ "source": [ "Mixed precision training (MPT) is becoming a practical technique to improve the speed and energy efficiency of training deep neural networks by leveraging the fast hardware support for IEEE half-precision floating point that is available in existing GPUs.", "MPT is typically used in combination with a technique called loss scaling, that works by scaling up the loss value up before the start of backpropagation in order to minimize the impact of numerical underflow on training.", "Unfortunately, existing methods make this loss scale value a hyperparameter that needs to be tuned per-model, and a single scale cannot be adapted to different layers at different training stages.", "We introduce a loss scaling-based training method called adaptive loss scaling that makes MPT easier and more practical to use, by removing the need to tune a model-specific loss scale hyperparameter.", "We achieve this by introducing layer-wise loss scale values which are automatically computed during training to deal with underflow more effectively than existing methods.", "We present experimental results on a variety of networks and tasks that show our approach can shorten the time to convergence and improve accuracy, compared with using the existing state-of-the-art MPT and single-precision floating point." ], "source_labels": [ 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0 ], "rouge_scores": [ 0.2399999958000001, 0.26086956082230633, 0.19999999531250012, 0.38095237636054424, 0.2051282003944774, 0.2978723360796741 ], "paper_id": "rJlnfaNYvB", "target": [ "We devise adaptive loss scaling to improve mixed precision training that surpass the state-of-the-art results.", "Proposal for an adaptive loss scaling method during backpropagation for mix precision training where scale rate is decided automatically to reduce the underflow.", "The authors propose a method to train models in FP16 precision that adopts a more elaborate way to minimize underflow in every layer simultaneously and automatically." ], "title": "Adaptive Loss Scaling for Mixed Precision Training" }
Data Fields
source
: The Abstract, Introduction and Conclusion (AIC) or Full text of the paper, with one sentence per line.source_labels
: Binary 0 or 1, 1 denotes the oracle sentence.rouge_scores
: Precomputed ROUGE baseline scores for each sentence.paper_id
: Arxiv Paper ID.target
: Multiple summaries for each sentence, one sentence per line.title
: Title of the paper.
Data Splits
train | valid | test | |
---|---|---|---|
SciTLDR-A | 1992 | 618 | 619 |
SciTLDR-AIC | 1992 | 618 | 619 |
SciTLDR-FullText | 1992 | 618 | 619 |
Dataset Creation
[More Information Needed]
Curation Rationale
[More Information Needed]
Source Data
Initial Data Collection and Normalization
[More Information Needed]
Who are the source language producers?
Annotations
Annotation process
Given the title and first 128 words of a reviewer comment about a paper, re-write the summary (if it exists) into a single sentence or an incomplete phrase. Summaries must be no more than one sentence. Most summaries are between 15 and 25 words. The average rewritten summary is 20 words long.
Who are the annotators?
[More Information Needed]
Personal and Sensitive Information
[More Information Needed]
Considerations for Using the Data
Social Impact of Dataset
To encourage further research in the area of extreme summarization of scientific documents.
Discussion of Biases
[More Information Needed]
Other Known Limitations
[More Information Needed]
Additional Information
Dataset Curators
[More Information Needed]
Licensing Information
Apache License 2.0
Citation Information
@article{cachola2020tldr, title={{TLDR}: Extreme Summarization of Scientific Documents}, author={Isabel Cachola and Kyle Lo and Arman Cohan and Daniel S. Weld}, journal={arXiv:2004.15011}, year={2020}, }
Contributions
Thanks to @Bharat123rox for adding this dataset.