Datasets:

chaoweihuang

/

SHP_pairwise

like 0

[ { "content": "You will receive a Reddit post along with two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more favored by humans based on the following criteria:\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nAfter considering the given information, please indicate which comment is preferred: A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: Why is it healthy to strain your heart through exercise, but unhealthy to strain it through stress, caffeine, nicotine etc? What is the difference between these kinds of cardiac strain?\n\nA: AFAIK, exercise leads to increased oxygen demand in your muscles, and can induce a relative lack of oxygen. The body will adapt: it will grow more small blood vessels to the muscles for oxygen delivery, it will increase your body's capacity of taking up oxygen, it will increase the effectiveness of oxygen use in the muscle by increasing the number of mitochondria in muscle cells, it will increase the number of muscle fibers, etc... Drugs like the ones you mentioned will likely stress the heart to some extent, similar to exercise, but will probably not lead to this degree of physical adaptation. In addition, chronic stress or cocaine use, for example, can lead to hypertension, which will lead to damage of the blood vessels, which could lead to stroke, heart attack, peripheral artery disease, renal disease, etc...\n\nB: Med student here This is a great question. Cardiovascular health actually has more to do with your body’s ability to supply its tissues with oxygen than having a ‘strong heart’. The point of exercise is that you are increasing your bodies need for oxygen to its tissues and it has to get better at extracting it from your blood. This can happen in several ways like the heart becoming more efficient at pumping blood or vessels getting better at supplying your organs. Nicotine, caffeine, and stress all stimulate your heart to beat harder and faster when you’re at rest without the increased need for oxygen. This is a good effect at the wrong time because the rest of your body isn’t expecting it and doesn’t prepare itself, leading to long term damage overtime. In conclusion: Using lots of energy trains your body to get better at sending oxygen to your organs, and makes your organs get better at extracting what it needs. The secret to cardiovascular health is heart rate + muscles moving and needing oxygen. If these two things don’t happen at the same time you get damage to your vessels, organs, etc.\n\nPlease respond with either A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be a given Reddit post and two comments for the Reddit post from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which of the comments is more preferred by human given the following criteria.\n\nYou need to consider following criteria\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nGiven above information, please answer which of the comment is more preferred by human, A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: Why is it healthy to strain your heart through exercise, but unhealthy to strain it through stress, caffeine, nicotine etc? What is the difference between these kinds of cardiac strain?\n\nA: I don't think there is evidence that caffeine causes any heart damage. In fact, the opposite. Up to about 6 cups of coffee a day is shown to have positive CV health effects. Edit: as a few have pointed out, there are rare cases of overdosing, which may be due to other factors or perhaps a predisposition or susceptibility to caffeine. https://www.jacc.org/doi/abs/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.06.035\n\nB: Med student here This is a great question. Cardiovascular health actually has more to do with your body’s ability to supply its tissues with oxygen than having a ‘strong heart’. The point of exercise is that you are increasing your bodies need for oxygen to its tissues and it has to get better at extracting it from your blood. This can happen in several ways like the heart becoming more efficient at pumping blood or vessels getting better at supplying your organs. Nicotine, caffeine, and stress all stimulate your heart to beat harder and faster when you’re at rest without the increased need for oxygen. This is a good effect at the wrong time because the rest of your body isn’t expecting it and doesn’t prepare itself, leading to long term damage overtime. In conclusion: Using lots of energy trains your body to get better at sending oxygen to your organs, and makes your organs get better at extracting what it needs. The secret to cardiovascular health is heart rate + muscles moving and needing oxygen. If these two things don’t happen at the same time you get damage to your vessels, organs, etc.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will receive a Reddit post along with two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more favored by humans based on the following criteria:\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nAfter considering the given information, please indicate which comment is preferred: A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: Why is it healthy to strain your heart through exercise, but unhealthy to strain it through stress, caffeine, nicotine etc? What is the difference between these kinds of cardiac strain?\n\nA: Med student here This is a great question. Cardiovascular health actually has more to do with your body’s ability to supply its tissues with oxygen than having a ‘strong heart’. The point of exercise is that you are increasing your bodies need for oxygen to its tissues and it has to get better at extracting it from your blood. This can happen in several ways like the heart becoming more efficient at pumping blood or vessels getting better at supplying your organs. Nicotine, caffeine, and stress all stimulate your heart to beat harder and faster when you’re at rest without the increased need for oxygen. This is a good effect at the wrong time because the rest of your body isn’t expecting it and doesn’t prepare itself, leading to long term damage overtime. In conclusion: Using lots of energy trains your body to get better at sending oxygen to your organs, and makes your organs get better at extracting what it needs. The secret to cardiovascular health is heart rate + muscles moving and needing oxygen. If these two things don’t happen at the same time you get damage to your vessels, organs, etc.\n\nB: Stress, caffeine and nicotine basically cause your heart to work harder, but without the rest of the body helping it. YOu can imagine your body like a car: you started it with a cold engine and floored the accelerator while standing still. The oil pump barely works yet, there isn't enough cooling, and the turbocharger can't collect as much air: just the pistons working very hard. While exercising, it is a car to be operated as it is designed: getting enough air to cool itself, the oil pump making sure everything is well lubricated, and the engine gets enough air so it can fully burn the gasoline. Everything working in tandem. Same with your body. When you exercise, hormones flood your blood, making sure to get enough oxygen, your storage releases sugar to help your heart and muscles get enough energy. The blood flow speeds up, and your kidneys and livers switch to a higher gear to filter out waste. Your lungs are expanding, making sure the generated extra CO2 can leave the blood. Muscles in your body works in tandem with your heart helping to pump blood around your body. Our body is evolved for this. The whole system is built around to move and excercise (to escape, fight and hunt, but still) Stress and chemicals only works your heart which is not really designed to handle this kind of pressure alone.\n\nPlease respond with either A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be a given Reddit post and two comments for the Reddit post from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which of the comments is more preferred by human given the following criteria.\n\nYou need to consider following criteria\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nGiven above information, please answer which of the comment is more preferred by human, A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: Why is it healthy to strain your heart through exercise, but unhealthy to strain it through stress, caffeine, nicotine etc? What is the difference between these kinds of cardiac strain?\n\nA: Theres many ways you can strain your heart: - natural exercise. Exercises usually start from something easy and stretches. For example a lot of people i know walk on the spot for a moment. This causes your heart to gradually increase its rate, and the rest of the body also adapts. Most notable immediate effect: your blood vessels increase a bit in diameter to allow more bloodflow. Doing this over and over with spaces in between makes it clear for your body it needs to buildup muscles, and so your heart gradually grows stronger (along with the other muscles ofc) - immediate stress. I cant think of a better term rn. What i mean for example is panic. Things like this have the same effect on your heartrate, but you didnt have that warmup face, so your heart pumps harder but the arteries didnt adept yet. This usually isnt too big of a problem, since its only a temporary situation, but can cause heart failure. - drugs: im not sure about nicotine and caffeine in particular, but the problem is usually that they increase the heartrate while at the same time decreasing the diameter of the blood vessels, causing an increase in blood pressure and strains your heart. The heart didnt have any time to adapt to the new stress, and if you have a particularly weak heart it could fail from the pressure\n\nB: Med student here This is a great question. Cardiovascular health actually has more to do with your body’s ability to supply its tissues with oxygen than having a ‘strong heart’. The point of exercise is that you are increasing your bodies need for oxygen to its tissues and it has to get better at extracting it from your blood. This can happen in several ways like the heart becoming more efficient at pumping blood or vessels getting better at supplying your organs. Nicotine, caffeine, and stress all stimulate your heart to beat harder and faster when you’re at rest without the increased need for oxygen. This is a good effect at the wrong time because the rest of your body isn’t expecting it and doesn’t prepare itself, leading to long term damage overtime. In conclusion: Using lots of energy trains your body to get better at sending oxygen to your organs, and makes your organs get better at extracting what it needs. The secret to cardiovascular health is heart rate + muscles moving and needing oxygen. If these two things don’t happen at the same time you get damage to your vessels, organs, etc.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be provided with a Reddit post and two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more preferred by humans based on the following criteria: Relevance to the Post, Clarity and Coherence, Depth and Thoughtfulness, Positive Tone and Respectful Language, Correctness and Accuracy, Natural Language and Tone, Conciseness\n\nGiven the information above, please select either A or B:\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: Why is it healthy to strain your heart through exercise, but unhealthy to strain it through stress, caffeine, nicotine etc? What is the difference between these kinds of cardiac strain?\n\nA: I don't think there is evidence that caffeine causes any heart damage. In fact, the opposite. Up to about 6 cups of coffee a day is shown to have positive CV health effects. Edit: as a few have pointed out, there are rare cases of overdosing, which may be due to other factors or perhaps a predisposition or susceptibility to caffeine. https://www.jacc.org/doi/abs/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.06.035\n\nB: Stress, caffeine and nicotine basically cause your heart to work harder, but without the rest of the body helping it. YOu can imagine your body like a car: you started it with a cold engine and floored the accelerator while standing still. The oil pump barely works yet, there isn't enough cooling, and the turbocharger can't collect as much air: just the pistons working very hard. While exercising, it is a car to be operated as it is designed: getting enough air to cool itself, the oil pump making sure everything is well lubricated, and the engine gets enough air so it can fully burn the gasoline. Everything working in tandem. Same with your body. When you exercise, hormones flood your blood, making sure to get enough oxygen, your storage releases sugar to help your heart and muscles get enough energy. The blood flow speeds up, and your kidneys and livers switch to a higher gear to filter out waste. Your lungs are expanding, making sure the generated extra CO2 can leave the blood. Muscles in your body works in tandem with your heart helping to pump blood around your body. Our body is evolved for this. The whole system is built around to move and excercise (to escape, fight and hunt, but still) Stress and chemicals only works your heart which is not really designed to handle this kind of pressure alone.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be provided with a Reddit post and two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more preferred by humans based on the following criteria: Relevance to the Post, Clarity and Coherence, Depth and Thoughtfulness, Positive Tone and Respectful Language, Correctness and Accuracy, Natural Language and Tone, Conciseness\n\nGiven the information above, please select either A or B:\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: Why is it healthy to strain your heart through exercise, but unhealthy to strain it through stress, caffeine, nicotine etc? What is the difference between these kinds of cardiac strain?\n\nA: Theres many ways you can strain your heart: - natural exercise. Exercises usually start from something easy and stretches. For example a lot of people i know walk on the spot for a moment. This causes your heart to gradually increase its rate, and the rest of the body also adapts. Most notable immediate effect: your blood vessels increase a bit in diameter to allow more bloodflow. Doing this over and over with spaces in between makes it clear for your body it needs to buildup muscles, and so your heart gradually grows stronger (along with the other muscles ofc) - immediate stress. I cant think of a better term rn. What i mean for example is panic. Things like this have the same effect on your heartrate, but you didnt have that warmup face, so your heart pumps harder but the arteries didnt adept yet. This usually isnt too big of a problem, since its only a temporary situation, but can cause heart failure. - drugs: im not sure about nicotine and caffeine in particular, but the problem is usually that they increase the heartrate while at the same time decreasing the diameter of the blood vessels, causing an increase in blood pressure and strains your heart. The heart didnt have any time to adapt to the new stress, and if you have a particularly weak heart it could fail from the pressure\n\nB: I don't think there is evidence that caffeine causes any heart damage. In fact, the opposite. Up to about 6 cups of coffee a day is shown to have positive CV health effects. Edit: as a few have pointed out, there are rare cases of overdosing, which may be due to other factors or perhaps a predisposition or susceptibility to caffeine. https://www.jacc.org/doi/abs/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.06.035\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be provided with a Reddit post and two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more preferred by humans based on the following criteria: Relevance to the Post, Clarity and Coherence, Depth and Thoughtfulness, Positive Tone and Respectful Language, Correctness and Accuracy, Natural Language and Tone, Conciseness\n\nGiven the information above, please select either A or B:\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: Why is it healthy to strain your heart through exercise, but unhealthy to strain it through stress, caffeine, nicotine etc? What is the difference between these kinds of cardiac strain?\n\nA: Theres many ways you can strain your heart: - natural exercise. Exercises usually start from something easy and stretches. For example a lot of people i know walk on the spot for a moment. This causes your heart to gradually increase its rate, and the rest of the body also adapts. Most notable immediate effect: your blood vessels increase a bit in diameter to allow more bloodflow. Doing this over and over with spaces in between makes it clear for your body it needs to buildup muscles, and so your heart gradually grows stronger (along with the other muscles ofc) - immediate stress. I cant think of a better term rn. What i mean for example is panic. Things like this have the same effect on your heartrate, but you didnt have that warmup face, so your heart pumps harder but the arteries didnt adept yet. This usually isnt too big of a problem, since its only a temporary situation, but can cause heart failure. - drugs: im not sure about nicotine and caffeine in particular, but the problem is usually that they increase the heartrate while at the same time decreasing the diameter of the blood vessels, causing an increase in blood pressure and strains your heart. The heart didnt have any time to adapt to the new stress, and if you have a particularly weak heart it could fail from the pressure\n\nB: Stress, caffeine and nicotine basically cause your heart to work harder, but without the rest of the body helping it. YOu can imagine your body like a car: you started it with a cold engine and floored the accelerator while standing still. The oil pump barely works yet, there isn't enough cooling, and the turbocharger can't collect as much air: just the pistons working very hard. While exercising, it is a car to be operated as it is designed: getting enough air to cool itself, the oil pump making sure everything is well lubricated, and the engine gets enough air so it can fully burn the gasoline. Everything working in tandem. Same with your body. When you exercise, hormones flood your blood, making sure to get enough oxygen, your storage releases sugar to help your heart and muscles get enough energy. The blood flow speeds up, and your kidneys and livers switch to a higher gear to filter out waste. Your lungs are expanding, making sure the generated extra CO2 can leave the blood. Muscles in your body works in tandem with your heart helping to pump blood around your body. Our body is evolved for this. The whole system is built around to move and excercise (to escape, fight and hunt, but still) Stress and chemicals only works your heart which is not really designed to handle this kind of pressure alone.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be provided with a Reddit post and two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more preferred by humans based on the following criteria: Relevance to the Post, Clarity and Coherence, Depth and Thoughtfulness, Positive Tone and Respectful Language, Correctness and Accuracy, Natural Language and Tone, Conciseness\n\nGiven the information above, please select either A or B:\nReddit post: ELi5: When a baby is born, how are their lungs instantly able to breathe air if they haven't been breathing air for 9 months?\n\nA: Alright here’s a very simple explanation. The placenta is what brings oxygen from mom to baby through baby’s umbilical cord (that’s where their belly button is) instead of through the lungs. When baby is inside mom, blood that has oxygen in it goes to the heart where it gets pumped out to the rest of the body. In you and me, there’s a little door that has a tunnel between the right side of the heart and the lungs. Our blood that needs oxygen goes through that tunnel to the lungs and then comes back through another tunnel to the left side of the heart, where it gets pumped out to the rest of the body. In an unborn baby, the little door between the right side of the heart and lungs is closed and the pressure behind the door is very high. It’s too hard for blood to get through it, so it goes around through another secret little door to the left side of the heart. When a baby is born, there is a big shift in pressure behind that little door. When a baby takes its first breath, the secret little door slams shut. It’s kind of like when a door slams shut because of wind. When that secret little door slams shut, the pressure behind the door to the lungs gets lower, and that door gets unlocked. Now, the blood in the right side of the heart can go through that little door to the lungs where it picks up oxygen, goes to the left side of the heart, and then gets pumped through the rest of the body. When baby is inside mom, the lungs still get a little bit of blood to them, but they aren’t the primary place where gas exchange takes place (where oxygen and carbon dioxide move in and out). They’re working on growing and producing a slippery soap-like substance called surfactant. The surfactant helps keep tiny air sacs called alveoli open and from sticking shut. The alveoli are where gas exchange takes place, otherwise known as how oxygen and carbon dioxide move in and out of your body. When the baby is born, that pressure change and sudden blood volume to the lungs and alveoli causes gas exchange to happen, and that’s how baby now breathes and gets its oxygen.\n\nB: Sometimes they do have a bit of gunk in their airway. The delivery team will have suction handy, in case they need to help baby clear stuff out. Elevated carbon dioxide in the blood is what gives you the urge to breathe, and as long as they're connected to the umbilical cord that shouldn't happen. Once they're out they start to accumulate CO2 for the first time in their life, and that makes them try inhaling for the first time. (During birth, a hormone - oxytocin, I think - makes them insensitive to the CO2 stimulus so it's very rare for them to start too early.)\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will receive a Reddit post along with two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more favored by humans based on the following criteria:\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nAfter considering the given information, please indicate which comment is preferred: A or B?\nReddit post: ELi5: When a baby is born, how are their lungs instantly able to breathe air if they haven't been breathing air for 9 months?\n\nA: Alright here’s a very simple explanation. The placenta is what brings oxygen from mom to baby through baby’s umbilical cord (that’s where their belly button is) instead of through the lungs. When baby is inside mom, blood that has oxygen in it goes to the heart where it gets pumped out to the rest of the body. In you and me, there’s a little door that has a tunnel between the right side of the heart and the lungs. Our blood that needs oxygen goes through that tunnel to the lungs and then comes back through another tunnel to the left side of the heart, where it gets pumped out to the rest of the body. In an unborn baby, the little door between the right side of the heart and lungs is closed and the pressure behind the door is very high. It’s too hard for blood to get through it, so it goes around through another secret little door to the left side of the heart. When a baby is born, there is a big shift in pressure behind that little door. When a baby takes its first breath, the secret little door slams shut. It’s kind of like when a door slams shut because of wind. When that secret little door slams shut, the pressure behind the door to the lungs gets lower, and that door gets unlocked. Now, the blood in the right side of the heart can go through that little door to the lungs where it picks up oxygen, goes to the left side of the heart, and then gets pumped through the rest of the body. When baby is inside mom, the lungs still get a little bit of blood to them, but they aren’t the primary place where gas exchange takes place (where oxygen and carbon dioxide move in and out). They’re working on growing and producing a slippery soap-like substance called surfactant. The surfactant helps keep tiny air sacs called alveoli open and from sticking shut. The alveoli are where gas exchange takes place, otherwise known as how oxygen and carbon dioxide move in and out of your body. When the baby is born, that pressure change and sudden blood volume to the lungs and alveoli causes gas exchange to happen, and that’s how baby now breathes and gets its oxygen.\n\nB: This is actually one of the most crucial times for a nurse because there are MANY instances where the baby doesn’t come out breathing and we need to resuscitate. Their lungs develop in utero via the amniotic fluid that they take in via mouth (iirc). The longer the baby is in utero the more time it had to develop its lungs (i think earliest viability is 22-24 weeks). If there’s not enough amniotic fluid or the baby is born prematurely its lungs will be underdeveloped. Many babies ARENT good at breathing initially and need attention early on as they adapt to their external world.\n\nPlease respond with either A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be provided with a Reddit post and two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more preferred by humans based on the following criteria: Relevance to the Post, Clarity and Coherence, Depth and Thoughtfulness, Positive Tone and Respectful Language, Correctness and Accuracy, Natural Language and Tone, Conciseness\n\nGiven the information above, please select either A or B:\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: Why is it children’s shampoo is “tear free” while regular shampoo burns like all hell in the eyes?\n\nA: \"tear free\" shampoos leave out surfactants that irritate your eyes, like the commonly used Sodium Laureth Sulfate. Surfactants are chemicals that lower the surface tension of water, making it easier to remove oil from your hair.\n\nB: Soap is a chemical with a long, and kind of clever, molecule. One end of the molecule attracts water. The other end attracts dirt, particularly oily dirt. So when you wash stuff, the oily-liking end sticks in the oily dirt and the other end gets stuck in water... and so the oily dirt gets pulled away from what you are cleaning when the water-liking end gets pulled away through scrubbing or swirling water around. So put some soap on your greasy hands, and scrub a bit, and all the greasy stuff gets lifted away. Now there are different levels of soap out there. The CLEANING 100 soap doesn't care about gentle, it just sucks dirt up like crazy at the expense of wimpy stuff like moisture and balance. The weaker soap works, but not quite so well, but at least it doesn't damage your skin or eyes, or dry out stuff in the process. So stronger soap chemicals are great for super greasy dirt, but the trade-off is they cause your eyes to sting when it hits them because your eyes are sensitive to super-effective soaps. But other soap chemicals don't cause your eyes to sting because they're not QUITE so good at sticking to oily dirt at one end, so they're not quite so good at cleaning or wrecking the careful balance of chemistry that keeps your eyes moist and in good shape. So we have a trade-off: oily dirt removal? Or no irritation to the eyes? Which one you want goes to which \"soap\" you use in your shampoo. And baby shampoo uses the second one even if it doesn't clean as good as the first, because babies generally don't stand underneath leaky car oilpans or go swimming in cold deep fryers unless you're a really bad parent. \\*\\*EDIT: Thank you all for the mega-gilding. I shall hammer them together into a scrub brush handle so I can finally get that out-of-reach spot on my back whilst I pamper myself in long hot gentle-and-not-irritating-soapy showers. You all rock.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be a given Reddit post and two comments for the Reddit post from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which of the comments is more preferred by human given the following criteria.\n\nYou need to consider following criteria\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nGiven above information, please answer which of the comment is more preferred by human, A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: Why is it children’s shampoo is “tear free” while regular shampoo burns like all hell in the eyes?\n\nA: According to Trisha Bonner, Manager of Research & Development at Johnson & Johnson, “Our formula uses large molecules...It is harder for large molecules to penetrate the skin versus small ones, which makes those products mild to the eyes (and skin).” Also, apparently no tears does indeed mean no crying and not no tears meaning no rips... https://www.refinery29.com/en-us/2017/08/167926/loreal-kids-shampoo-no-tears-meaning\n\nB: Most baby shampoos are created by reducing the amount of, or getting entirely rid of, shampoo ingredients that have the ability to irritate their eyes. Soap based shampoos have a higher pH due to the way the alkalis (don’t worry, they’re removed in the final product) react with the plant oil of the manufacturer’s choice. These will be more likely to irritate the eyes. Soap free shampoos go through a lot of chemical processes to create surfactants that don’t irritate the eye but can create carcinogenic byproducts that don’t need to be listed on the bottle.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be a given Reddit post and two comments for the Reddit post from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which of the comments is more preferred by human given the following criteria.\n\nYou need to consider following criteria\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nGiven above information, please answer which of the comment is more preferred by human, A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: Why is it children’s shampoo is “tear free” while regular shampoo burns like all hell in the eyes?\n\nA: According to Trisha Bonner, Manager of Research & Development at Johnson & Johnson, “Our formula uses large molecules...It is harder for large molecules to penetrate the skin versus small ones, which makes those products mild to the eyes (and skin).” Also, apparently no tears does indeed mean no crying and not no tears meaning no rips... https://www.refinery29.com/en-us/2017/08/167926/loreal-kids-shampoo-no-tears-meaning\n\nB: \"tear free\" shampoos leave out surfactants that irritate your eyes, like the commonly used Sodium Laureth Sulfate. Surfactants are chemicals that lower the surface tension of water, making it easier to remove oil from your hair.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be a given Reddit post and two comments for the Reddit post from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which of the comments is more preferred by human given the following criteria.\n\nYou need to consider following criteria\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nGiven above information, please answer which of the comment is more preferred by human, A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: Why is it children’s shampoo is “tear free” while regular shampoo burns like all hell in the eyes?\n\nA: \"tear free\" shampoos leave out surfactants that irritate your eyes, like the commonly used Sodium Laureth Sulfate. Surfactants are chemicals that lower the surface tension of water, making it easier to remove oil from your hair.\n\nB: Most baby shampoos are created by reducing the amount of, or getting entirely rid of, shampoo ingredients that have the ability to irritate their eyes. Soap based shampoos have a higher pH due to the way the alkalis (don’t worry, they’re removed in the final product) react with the plant oil of the manufacturer’s choice. These will be more likely to irritate the eyes. Soap free shampoos go through a lot of chemical processes to create surfactants that don’t irritate the eye but can create carcinogenic byproducts that don’t need to be listed on the bottle.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will receive a Reddit post along with two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more favored by humans based on the following criteria:\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nAfter considering the given information, please indicate which comment is preferred: A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: Why is finding \"patient zero\" in an epidemic so important?\n\nA: One more important thing to note is that the disease samples of P-Zero are likely to be the original mutagen. Considering how diseases adapt themselves according to the host or environs they find themselves in, it is important to know what the original structure of of microbe looked like. That way it is possible to simulate the possible mutations and find a base counter to all of them. If that isn't possible, then one needs to try out different vaccine strains which cost a lot of time and money.\n\nB: Biocontainment team member here. Helps to find out who has it, who the disease may have spread to and came from. Say you had a person from Sierrea Leone that was Ebola positive, we'd have to know if they took a boat or plane, did they take a direct flight or did they drive after landing? If they drove did they use a taxi or drive alone? Is the patient wet or dry? (Are try actively vomiting/sneezing/bleeding/diarrheaing or are they just experiencing initial signs and symptoms) gives us an idea how sick others may be. PROTIP: don't go to a hospital and pretend to have Ebola, we lock your ass down. I think it's our safety measure to have you masked up within 5min, isolated within 7, and have EVS follow your walking path with a bleach mop.if you are just at a random hospital you will be sent to an assessment site to be evaluated if your hospital isn't.\n\nPlease respond with either A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will receive a Reddit post along with two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more favored by humans based on the following criteria:\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nAfter considering the given information, please indicate which comment is preferred: A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: You're not supposed to defrost meats in warm water due to harmful bacteria growth, you're not supposed to leave food at room temperature for long without being refrigerated because of harmful growth but, when you go to a buffet, food can sit out for hours under heat lamps and be fine?\n\nA: There's a concept in food safety called the \"danger zone\". It extends from about 40 F / 5 C to about 140 F / 60 C. You can keep food below the lower end of that range, or above the upper end, for a while without it going bad. The reason is that this is approximately the range of temperatures that the bacteria that cause foodborne illness can tolerate well enough to grow. They can survive in lower temps, but they won't grow or will grow very slowly, which is why you can store meat in the fridge for a few days without problems. (They'll die at higher temps if they're kept that hot for a while, as in sous vide cooking, but can survive brief exposure.) The food at the buffet is (at least supposed to be) kept above 140 F / 60 C, so that whatever bacteria may be present can't grow effectively. The trays at a buffet usually sit above a pool of very hot water in addition to the heat lamps, which keeps them hot. (This is if the food does stay out for hours. It may simply be changed out regularly, in which case it can be kept in the danger zone.) You can take the \"keep it above the upper end of the range\" principle really far, because temps above 140 F / 60 C will kill almost all bacteria with prolonged exposure. This is the principle behind perpetual stews, foods which were effectively cooked for years or decades.\n\nB: Microbial growth can be slowed either by keeping food cold or hot, but the range around 41-140 °F is generally considered unacceptable for controlling the growth of pathogens.\n\nPlease respond with either A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will receive a Reddit post along with two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more favored by humans based on the following criteria:\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nAfter considering the given information, please indicate which comment is preferred: A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: You're not supposed to defrost meats in warm water due to harmful bacteria growth, you're not supposed to leave food at room temperature for long without being refrigerated because of harmful growth but, when you go to a buffet, food can sit out for hours under heat lamps and be fine?\n\nA: The first one is kind of an old wives tale and isn't backed up by science, except in the case of particularly thick cuts where it will take a very long time to thaw the inside with hot water, keeping the outside in the \"danger zone\" for long enough for notable bacteria growth to happen. Here's an actual study on the matter and here's a more reader-friendly article.. When you're talking about food at home, you'd likely be perfectly fine if you cooked some food, left it out at room temperature for an hour or two and then finished eating it. That being said, the advice tends to take into account that you're likely going to put it back in the fridge, warm it up again, and consume more later - potentially multiple times. This gives way more opportunity for bacteria growth later. With a buffet, you cook the food which kills everything, set it out and keep it warm (some stuff like meat might be kept warm enough to slow down but not completely stop bacteria growth), and then either the entire thing is eaten over a few hours or it's discarded.\n\nB: Also it should be noted, most health regulation not only requires you keep buffet food in a certain temperature range, But they also don't let you take food \"exposed to the public\" back into the kitchen. Nor do they allow you to have food in display for longer than a set time (even in a good range) - at least that's the rules we have in Canada.\n\nPlease respond with either A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be a given Reddit post and two comments for the Reddit post from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which of the comments is more preferred by human given the following criteria.\n\nYou need to consider following criteria\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nGiven above information, please answer which of the comment is more preferred by human, A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: You're not supposed to defrost meats in warm water due to harmful bacteria growth, you're not supposed to leave food at room temperature for long without being refrigerated because of harmful growth but, when you go to a buffet, food can sit out for hours under heat lamps and be fine?\n\nA: Microbial growth can be slowed either by keeping food cold or hot, but the range around 41-140 °F is generally considered unacceptable for controlling the growth of pathogens.\n\nB: Also it should be noted, most health regulation not only requires you keep buffet food in a certain temperature range, But they also don't let you take food \"exposed to the public\" back into the kitchen. Nor do they allow you to have food in display for longer than a set time (even in a good range) - at least that's the rules we have in Canada.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be provided with a Reddit post and two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more preferred by humans based on the following criteria: Relevance to the Post, Clarity and Coherence, Depth and Thoughtfulness, Positive Tone and Respectful Language, Correctness and Accuracy, Natural Language and Tone, Conciseness\n\nGiven the information above, please select either A or B:\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: You're not supposed to defrost meats in warm water due to harmful bacteria growth, you're not supposed to leave food at room temperature for long without being refrigerated because of harmful growth but, when you go to a buffet, food can sit out for hours under heat lamps and be fine?\n\nA: The first one is kind of an old wives tale and isn't backed up by science, except in the case of particularly thick cuts where it will take a very long time to thaw the inside with hot water, keeping the outside in the \"danger zone\" for long enough for notable bacteria growth to happen. Here's an actual study on the matter and here's a more reader-friendly article.. When you're talking about food at home, you'd likely be perfectly fine if you cooked some food, left it out at room temperature for an hour or two and then finished eating it. That being said, the advice tends to take into account that you're likely going to put it back in the fridge, warm it up again, and consume more later - potentially multiple times. This gives way more opportunity for bacteria growth later. With a buffet, you cook the food which kills everything, set it out and keep it warm (some stuff like meat might be kept warm enough to slow down but not completely stop bacteria growth), and then either the entire thing is eaten over a few hours or it's discarded.\n\nB: In addition to what everyone else is saying about the temperature danger zone, food also needs to be at that temp for a few hours before it has enough chance to grow enough bacteria to be considered unsafe. If a buffet goes through food fast enough it’s safe as long as they ensure they throw out any food that’s been out too long. But defrosting meat often takes quite a while which is why it’s particularly dangerous to do incorrectly.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will receive a Reddit post along with two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more favored by humans based on the following criteria:\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nAfter considering the given information, please indicate which comment is preferred: A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: You're not supposed to defrost meats in warm water due to harmful bacteria growth, you're not supposed to leave food at room temperature for long without being refrigerated because of harmful growth but, when you go to a buffet, food can sit out for hours under heat lamps and be fine?\n\nA: Microbial growth can be slowed either by keeping food cold or hot, but the range around 41-140 °F is generally considered unacceptable for controlling the growth of pathogens.\n\nB: In addition to what everyone else is saying about the temperature danger zone, food also needs to be at that temp for a few hours before it has enough chance to grow enough bacteria to be considered unsafe. If a buffet goes through food fast enough it’s safe as long as they ensure they throw out any food that’s been out too long. But defrosting meat often takes quite a while which is why it’s particularly dangerous to do incorrectly.\n\nPlease respond with either A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be provided with a Reddit post and two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more preferred by humans based on the following criteria: Relevance to the Post, Clarity and Coherence, Depth and Thoughtfulness, Positive Tone and Respectful Language, Correctness and Accuracy, Natural Language and Tone, Conciseness\n\nGiven the information above, please select either A or B:\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: You're not supposed to defrost meats in warm water due to harmful bacteria growth, you're not supposed to leave food at room temperature for long without being refrigerated because of harmful growth but, when you go to a buffet, food can sit out for hours under heat lamps and be fine?\n\nA: Microbial growth can be slowed either by keeping food cold or hot, but the range around 41-140 °F is generally considered unacceptable for controlling the growth of pathogens.\n\nB: The first one is kind of an old wives tale and isn't backed up by science, except in the case of particularly thick cuts where it will take a very long time to thaw the inside with hot water, keeping the outside in the \"danger zone\" for long enough for notable bacteria growth to happen. Here's an actual study on the matter and here's a more reader-friendly article.. When you're talking about food at home, you'd likely be perfectly fine if you cooked some food, left it out at room temperature for an hour or two and then finished eating it. That being said, the advice tends to take into account that you're likely going to put it back in the fridge, warm it up again, and consume more later - potentially multiple times. This gives way more opportunity for bacteria growth later. With a buffet, you cook the food which kills everything, set it out and keep it warm (some stuff like meat might be kept warm enough to slow down but not completely stop bacteria growth), and then either the entire thing is eaten over a few hours or it's discarded.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be provided with a Reddit post and two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more preferred by humans based on the following criteria: Relevance to the Post, Clarity and Coherence, Depth and Thoughtfulness, Positive Tone and Respectful Language, Correctness and Accuracy, Natural Language and Tone, Conciseness\n\nGiven the information above, please select either A or B:\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: You're not supposed to defrost meats in warm water due to harmful bacteria growth, you're not supposed to leave food at room temperature for long without being refrigerated because of harmful growth but, when you go to a buffet, food can sit out for hours under heat lamps and be fine?\n\nA: Ive always wondered as well, why does it matter if some bacteria grows when we thaw meat under water. If we cook it, does it not eliminate all the harmful bacteria?\n\nB: Keep in mind that the salad bar is usually the biggest source of food borne illness at buffets.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be provided with a Reddit post and two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more preferred by humans based on the following criteria: Relevance to the Post, Clarity and Coherence, Depth and Thoughtfulness, Positive Tone and Respectful Language, Correctness and Accuracy, Natural Language and Tone, Conciseness\n\nGiven the information above, please select either A or B:\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: You're not supposed to defrost meats in warm water due to harmful bacteria growth, you're not supposed to leave food at room temperature for long without being refrigerated because of harmful growth but, when you go to a buffet, food can sit out for hours under heat lamps and be fine?\n\nA: Okay five year old explanation. Very cold: freeze and die like you would in Siberia in winter with no coat. Very hot: overheat and die like a person left in a car on a sunny, summer day in Pheonix, AZ. In between: live and prosper. Bacteria are like you. Too hot: die; too cold: die.\n\nB: Ive always wondered as well, why does it matter if some bacteria grows when we thaw meat under water. If we cook it, does it not eliminate all the harmful bacteria?\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be a given Reddit post and two comments for the Reddit post from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which of the comments is more preferred by human given the following criteria.\n\nYou need to consider following criteria\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nGiven above information, please answer which of the comment is more preferred by human, A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: how can our brains remember that we forgot something, but it can't remember what we forgot?\n\nA: This question asks \"how is it possible?\" and not \"how does it work?\", so I won't talk about actual brains here. But even very simple information storage and retrieval systems can be constructed so that it's obvious when information has been lost. For example, let's say you have a book with 100 numbered pages in it. Page 46 might be blanked out. You know that's an error, since there is no page numbered 46 after page 45, and page 47 doesn't pick up where 45 left off. Something is missing. You don't know what was on page 46, but you can be pretty sure it's gone.\n\nB: You're remembering something else connected to what you forgot. For example if you were going to tell someone something but forgot what it was. You know you forgot the thing you were going to say but remember that you wanted to say it.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be provided with a Reddit post and two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more preferred by humans based on the following criteria: Relevance to the Post, Clarity and Coherence, Depth and Thoughtfulness, Positive Tone and Respectful Language, Correctness and Accuracy, Natural Language and Tone, Conciseness\n\nGiven the information above, please select either A or B:\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: how can our brains remember that we forgot something, but it can't remember what we forgot?\n\nA: You're remembering something else connected to what you forgot. For example if you were going to tell someone something but forgot what it was. You know you forgot the thing you were going to say but remember that you wanted to say it.\n\nB: Lots of half-answers here which sort of just reframe the original question as an analogy. **To understand this we need to understand how memories work**. They aren't data files. Memories are (simply) stored in what are called *synapses*. A synapse is a connection between two neurons (brain cells). The synapse is how one cell tells another cell to fire. So if we take a simple example, you smell a delicious pie, the neurons that detect that smell set off a chain of synaptic signals that tell your mouth to start watering. But what about someone who doesn't like pie? They smell the same pie but their mouth doesn't water. It's because the synaptic pathways get stronger the more they get used, and that process is even faster if there's dopamine released. Dopamine is the \"I want that\" chemical that our brain releases, and it's highly involved in addiction and anticipation. So, when the pie-lover smells the pie, they \"want it\", and dopamine washes over their brain. As they start to eat the pie, their mouth waters, and so the pathway from 'smell' to 'water' gets stronger. The pie-hater smells the pie, and goes and does something else. There's no dopamine and no strengthening of pathways. Okay, so **how does this relate to memories?** Well, memories are basically just more complex versions of that. A certain series of events (a conversation, reading something on reddit, whatever) causes you to think of your Mum, and that primes the synaptic pathways. Maybe you're looking for her in a crowd, and so you've got a clear image of her face in your mind. Maybe you're about to call her for Mother's Day, and so you start to remember her phone number. All of these are different synaptic pathways that are able to be activated from the initial prompt of 'Mum'. It's because you've seen her face so many times, or called her so often that you're able to recall those exact details. The same pathways that light up when you physically look at her face are being 'refired' when you recall her face, because those connections have been strengthened over years. That's long term memory. There's also short term memory, and this is I think what the OP's referring to. You walk into the garage, you know you came in to look for something, but you have *no idea what.* That's because the object (or the idea to grab it) was stored in your short term memory. You're just fixing the shelves in the upstairs bedroom, this isn't something that you do every day, and so it's not 'stored' in your brain. Instead, it's in short term memory, which can generally 'hold' about 5 or 6 objects at a time (this is why when someone gives you a phone number you have to say it over and over to keep it in your head until you can write it down). The idea stays in short term memory for as long as you're thinking about it, but if you stop (let's say because you notice that the grass is getting long and you should mow it, but it's also getting late and it's Mother's Day and you should call your Mum) then the idea fades. You'll walk into the garage, because that's a preplanned set of actions that you do all the time, you brain just set it as 'fire and forget', but you won't be able to remember why you came in, because it hasn't yet been stored anywhere. So how do you remember what it was? You retrace your steps! This is because whatever the idea was came to you based on something you saw or thought about. So you walk back upstairs, notice the bookshelf is off-skew, and it comes back to you! **The bottom line is this**: all memories (muscle memory, explicit memory, smell-associations, etc) are stored in our brains through repeated use. This is called 'Hebbian Theory', and often summarised as \"neurons that fire together wire together\". It's probably a simplification, but it's the foundation of most of our understanding of memory and how the brain organises itself.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will receive a Reddit post along with two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more favored by humans based on the following criteria:\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nAfter considering the given information, please indicate which comment is preferred: A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: Why do older emulated games still occasionally slow down when rendering too many sprites, even though it's running on hardware thousands of times faster than what it was programmed on originally?\n\nA: Accuracy of emulation. If the original hardware would have done it, your emulator should do it. Simulating hardware means reproducing all the features as well as all the limitations. Some emulators have an option to overclock the emulated CPU or raise the sprite limit, but there are risks if the game isn't prepared for it. Behaviour of not running on the original hardware is undefined and you are in uncharted territory for the developers.\n\nB: Part of it is how accurately you want to emulate. Take the game Space Invaders. You may recall there's many enemies and as you kill them they speed up. That was not coded in, it was a happy side effect of the processor being able to render fewer faster (and one super fast lol). If the emulator is not coded to run at the same speed as the old processor then you won't get this effect. Edit: I didn't learn this from Game Maker's Toolkit, never heard of that show.\n\nPlease respond with either A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be provided with a Reddit post and two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more preferred by humans based on the following criteria: Relevance to the Post, Clarity and Coherence, Depth and Thoughtfulness, Positive Tone and Respectful Language, Correctness and Accuracy, Natural Language and Tone, Conciseness\n\nGiven the information above, please select either A or B:\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: Why do older emulated games still occasionally slow down when rendering too many sprites, even though it's running on hardware thousands of times faster than what it was programmed on originally?\n\nA: Part of it is how accurately you want to emulate. Take the game Space Invaders. You may recall there's many enemies and as you kill them they speed up. That was not coded in, it was a happy side effect of the processor being able to render fewer faster (and one super fast lol). If the emulator is not coded to run at the same speed as the old processor then you won't get this effect. Edit: I didn't learn this from Game Maker's Toolkit, never heard of that show.\n\nB: Not exactly a super old game, but Age of Mythology was made when computers only had one core, when they re released it on steam it had massive lag and gameplay issues and no amount of computing power really helped because the game could only be run through one of the computers cores. What they needed to do was build it up from a bit further back so that the game couldn't utilise the newer computing power. Could be totally wrong on this, as this is just what other community members have told me and I have no idea what I'm talking about haha\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be provided with a Reddit post and two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more preferred by humans based on the following criteria: Relevance to the Post, Clarity and Coherence, Depth and Thoughtfulness, Positive Tone and Respectful Language, Correctness and Accuracy, Natural Language and Tone, Conciseness\n\nGiven the information above, please select either A or B:\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: Why do older emulated games still occasionally slow down when rendering too many sprites, even though it's running on hardware thousands of times faster than what it was programmed on originally?\n\nA: Not exactly a super old game, but Age of Mythology was made when computers only had one core, when they re released it on steam it had massive lag and gameplay issues and no amount of computing power really helped because the game could only be run through one of the computers cores. What they needed to do was build it up from a bit further back so that the game couldn't utilise the newer computing power. Could be totally wrong on this, as this is just what other community members have told me and I have no idea what I'm talking about haha\n\nB: The games are not emulated, the systems are. A chip has instructions on it, that can not be changed. Software has instructions that can be changed. What this means, is that an emulator \"emulates\" the system, not the game. That includes clock frequency.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will receive a Reddit post along with two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more favored by humans based on the following criteria:\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nAfter considering the given information, please indicate which comment is preferred: A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: Why do ships have circular windows instead of square ones?\n\nA: The joke answer is so that the water doesn't hit you square in the face. The real answer is that shapes with sharp corners are structurally weak. Arcs and circles are very strong shapes. If port holes were squares, the openings would get damaged and worn out sooner.\n\nB: For the same reason that airplanes have round(ish) windows. The structure of a ship is put through a lot of changing stresses, both in the sense of the ship being heaved and twisted by waves, and in some cases having actual water pressing against the portholes. The corners or square windows are a point where stresses can build up - it's a weak point. Circles or circular shapes are better at distributing forces equally. The same is true in airplanes, though there the pressure is from the inside, as the outside pressure drops. Early jets had square windows, and it caused several accidents as the uneven stresses over many many flights led to metal fatigue and finally failure.\n\nPlease respond with either A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be a given Reddit post and two comments for the Reddit post from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which of the comments is more preferred by human given the following criteria.\n\nYou need to consider following criteria\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nGiven above information, please answer which of the comment is more preferred by human, A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: Why do ships have circular windows instead of square ones?\n\nA: The joke answer is so that the water doesn't hit you square in the face. The real answer is that shapes with sharp corners are structurally weak. Arcs and circles are very strong shapes. If port holes were squares, the openings would get damaged and worn out sooner.\n\nB: for the same reason planes have rounded windows instead of square ones. a square window has a corner and that is a stress point. a rounded window spreads the pressure and does not lead to stress fractures.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be provided with a Reddit post and two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more preferred by humans based on the following criteria: Relevance to the Post, Clarity and Coherence, Depth and Thoughtfulness, Positive Tone and Respectful Language, Correctness and Accuracy, Natural Language and Tone, Conciseness\n\nGiven the information above, please select either A or B:\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How do ships anchor themselves in very deep waters? For example, if they anchored in 10K foot deep oceans, do they actually have 10K feet of anchor chains?\n\nA: There is usually no need to anchor the ship in deep waters. They just stop the engine and drift. It is going to be days or even weeks before they even get remotely close to anything dangerous so there is no need for an anchor. They might have to periodically start their engines to go back to the place they were supposed to be but that is not a big deal. There is also something called a sea anchor. It looks like a parachute which they drop into the sea. This does make them drift more with the current and less with the wind. However the most important reason is that by hooking the sea anchor to the bow of the ship it always faces the wind and the waves. That helps a bit since there is no waves hitting the ship on the side where it rocks the ship so a sea anchor gives the ship more stability. Larger vessels do not care about this though as they are wide enough for the waves to not affect them.\n\nB: The short answer is: they don’t. Ocean going vessels tend to anchor in waters 100-150 ft deep or less. You need anywhere from 2x to 6x the depth of the water in chain length (depending on wind/current) to hold fast.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be a given Reddit post and two comments for the Reddit post from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which of the comments is more preferred by human given the following criteria.\n\nYou need to consider following criteria\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nGiven above information, please answer which of the comment is more preferred by human, A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How do ships anchor themselves in very deep waters? For example, if they anchored in 10K foot deep oceans, do they actually have 10K feet of anchor chains?\n\nA: There is usually no need to anchor the ship in deep waters. They just stop the engine and drift. It is going to be days or even weeks before they even get remotely close to anything dangerous so there is no need for an anchor. They might have to periodically start their engines to go back to the place they were supposed to be but that is not a big deal. There is also something called a sea anchor. It looks like a parachute which they drop into the sea. This does make them drift more with the current and less with the wind. However the most important reason is that by hooking the sea anchor to the bow of the ship it always faces the wind and the waves. That helps a bit since there is no waves hitting the ship on the side where it rocks the ship so a sea anchor gives the ship more stability. Larger vessels do not care about this though as they are wide enough for the waves to not affect them.\n\nB: Ships don't anchor themselves when they are in deep water. If you are in the middle of the ocean, there isn't really anything for you to drift into, so you just float around, and if you drift a little, it's no big deal.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be provided with a Reddit post and two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more preferred by humans based on the following criteria: Relevance to the Post, Clarity and Coherence, Depth and Thoughtfulness, Positive Tone and Respectful Language, Correctness and Accuracy, Natural Language and Tone, Conciseness\n\nGiven the information above, please select either A or B:\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How do ships anchor themselves in very deep waters? For example, if they anchored in 10K foot deep oceans, do they actually have 10K feet of anchor chains?\n\nA: Ships don't anchor themselves when they are in deep water. If you are in the middle of the ocean, there isn't really anything for you to drift into, so you just float around, and if you drift a little, it's no big deal.\n\nB: The short answer is: they don’t. Ocean going vessels tend to anchor in waters 100-150 ft deep or less. You need anywhere from 2x to 6x the depth of the water in chain length (depending on wind/current) to hold fast.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be provided with a Reddit post and two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more preferred by humans based on the following criteria: Relevance to the Post, Clarity and Coherence, Depth and Thoughtfulness, Positive Tone and Respectful Language, Correctness and Accuracy, Natural Language and Tone, Conciseness\n\nGiven the information above, please select either A or B:\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: why can't we have supplements or pills for dopamine, oxytocin, serotonin or endorphins just like we have melatonin or contraceptive pills?\n\nA: Most of these things won’t make it to your brain if eaten / injected. Your body works pretty hard to prevent biologically common chemicals from messing with brain chemistry. If it didn’t, eating animals would be like takings tons of drugs and could kill you. If you eat a fly by accident, none of the fly’s dopamine gets into your brain. That’s a good thing!\n\nB: I don’t think the other posts are answering your question. Supplements of dopamine, serotonin, etc are not sold because those chemicals do not cross the blood-brain barrier. The blood brain barrier is essentially a filter, and it only allows specific chemicals into the brain, like glucose. So even if you took a pill that contains pure dopamine, it will not get to your brain. I think answers that say the ‘potential for abuse is too high’ are wrong, since a supplement of pure dopamine, serotonin, etc do not actually make it to the brain.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be a given Reddit post and two comments for the Reddit post from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which of the comments is more preferred by human given the following criteria.\n\nYou need to consider following criteria\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nGiven above information, please answer which of the comment is more preferred by human, A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: why can't we have supplements or pills for dopamine, oxytocin, serotonin or endorphins just like we have melatonin or contraceptive pills?\n\nA: I don’t think the other posts are answering your question. Supplements of dopamine, serotonin, etc are not sold because those chemicals do not cross the blood-brain barrier. The blood brain barrier is essentially a filter, and it only allows specific chemicals into the brain, like glucose. So even if you took a pill that contains pure dopamine, it will not get to your brain. I think answers that say the ‘potential for abuse is too high’ are wrong, since a supplement of pure dopamine, serotonin, etc do not actually make it to the brain.\n\nB: We do. Kinda. There are prescription drugs, illegal recreational drugs, and legal herbal supplements. Citicoline (CDP Choline) can be bought over the counter and has been shown as likely to increase dopamine receptor density. But obviously, taking *anything* that alters brain chemistry can have negative effects\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will receive a Reddit post along with two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more favored by humans based on the following criteria:\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nAfter considering the given information, please indicate which comment is preferred: A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old : how are we sure that we all see the same colors ? I'm not sure how should I phrase it but lets give it a try. How are we sure that the color I see as green, for exemple, is the same color as someone else's green? Is it possible that the color I call green is an other color for someone else's eyes but we name it the same because we grew up with people naming this color \"green\"? I really hope im being clear enough\n\nA: Until we get full bore telepathy online, we will never know for sure. However, we are all using the same basic hardware - rods and cones, neurons, etc. So it is not unreasonable to assume that my green is the same as your green. On the other hand, it doesn't matter how we experience things internally. What matters is that we agree that the word \"green\" corresponds to the same portion of the visible spectrum.\n\nB: There is a YouTube video about it from vsauce, greatly explained that you and I might see the color green and agree that it's green. But your brains converts your green it to something that would be my red. And maybe my red, would be would your brain sees as green and so on. So we agree it's green, but what it looks like might be Vet different. I guess the only thing the same I black and white as they cpintoin all color or none\n\nPlease respond with either A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be provided with a Reddit post and two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more preferred by humans based on the following criteria: Relevance to the Post, Clarity and Coherence, Depth and Thoughtfulness, Positive Tone and Respectful Language, Correctness and Accuracy, Natural Language and Tone, Conciseness\n\nGiven the information above, please select either A or B:\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old : how are we sure that we all see the same colors ? I'm not sure how should I phrase it but lets give it a try. How are we sure that the color I see as green, for exemple, is the same color as someone else's green? Is it possible that the color I call green is an other color for someone else's eyes but we name it the same because we grew up with people naming this color \"green\"? I really hope im being clear enough\n\nA: Chris and Jack did a really funny sketch about body swapping that includes a great bit about this. But, yeah, it’s all about subjective perceptions of reality. We can all look at a banana and agree that it’s yellow, but theoretically perceive it as completely different pigments than each other. I may see the banana as what you would call brown, and you’d see it as what I call purple, but we’d both say it’s yellow from our own personal perceptions.\n\nB: Until we get full bore telepathy online, we will never know for sure. However, we are all using the same basic hardware - rods and cones, neurons, etc. So it is not unreasonable to assume that my green is the same as your green. On the other hand, it doesn't matter how we experience things internally. What matters is that we agree that the word \"green\" corresponds to the same portion of the visible spectrum.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will receive a Reddit post along with two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more favored by humans based on the following criteria:\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nAfter considering the given information, please indicate which comment is preferred: A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old : how are we sure that we all see the same colors ? I'm not sure how should I phrase it but lets give it a try. How are we sure that the color I see as green, for exemple, is the same color as someone else's green? Is it possible that the color I call green is an other color for someone else's eyes but we name it the same because we grew up with people naming this color \"green\"? I really hope im being clear enough\n\nA: Color wheel would make no sense if humans generally didn’t experience the same qualia for a specific instance of sight How often do you see people complaining that it’s hard to perceive black text on a white background? Never, because no one’s black is perceived as something like a yellow\n\nB: Until we get full bore telepathy online, we will never know for sure. However, we are all using the same basic hardware - rods and cones, neurons, etc. So it is not unreasonable to assume that my green is the same as your green. On the other hand, it doesn't matter how we experience things internally. What matters is that we agree that the word \"green\" corresponds to the same portion of the visible spectrum.\n\nPlease respond with either A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will receive a Reddit post along with two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more favored by humans based on the following criteria:\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nAfter considering the given information, please indicate which comment is preferred: A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old : how are we sure that we all see the same colors ? I'm not sure how should I phrase it but lets give it a try. How are we sure that the color I see as green, for exemple, is the same color as someone else's green? Is it possible that the color I call green is an other color for someone else's eyes but we name it the same because we grew up with people naming this color \"green\"? I really hope im being clear enough\n\nA: There is a YouTube video about it from vsauce, greatly explained that you and I might see the color green and agree that it's green. But your brains converts your green it to something that would be my red. And maybe my red, would be would your brain sees as green and so on. So we agree it's green, but what it looks like might be Vet different. I guess the only thing the same I black and white as they cpintoin all color or none\n\nB: This is actually a common philosophical question. You can read about it in books about consciousness such as I Am A Strange Loop. One thing to note though. Not only do we all agree on what color something is, everyone also shares a huge amount of connotations associated with the color. We all agree on what different colors and combinations mean, etc. In this way, our experience must be much the same. However, we ultimately don't know what someone's subjective experience is like. Someone else's experience, at its core, could be unimaginably alien to someone else.\n\nPlease respond with either A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be provided with a Reddit post and two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more preferred by humans based on the following criteria: Relevance to the Post, Clarity and Coherence, Depth and Thoughtfulness, Positive Tone and Respectful Language, Correctness and Accuracy, Natural Language and Tone, Conciseness\n\nGiven the information above, please select either A or B:\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old : how are we sure that we all see the same colors ? I'm not sure how should I phrase it but lets give it a try. How are we sure that the color I see as green, for exemple, is the same color as someone else's green? Is it possible that the color I call green is an other color for someone else's eyes but we name it the same because we grew up with people naming this color \"green\"? I really hope im being clear enough\n\nA: Chris and Jack did a really funny sketch about body swapping that includes a great bit about this. But, yeah, it’s all about subjective perceptions of reality. We can all look at a banana and agree that it’s yellow, but theoretically perceive it as completely different pigments than each other. I may see the banana as what you would call brown, and you’d see it as what I call purple, but we’d both say it’s yellow from our own personal perceptions.\n\nB: This is actually a common philosophical question. You can read about it in books about consciousness such as I Am A Strange Loop. One thing to note though. Not only do we all agree on what color something is, everyone also shares a huge amount of connotations associated with the color. We all agree on what different colors and combinations mean, etc. In this way, our experience must be much the same. However, we ultimately don't know what someone's subjective experience is like. Someone else's experience, at its core, could be unimaginably alien to someone else.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be provided with a Reddit post and two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more preferred by humans based on the following criteria: Relevance to the Post, Clarity and Coherence, Depth and Thoughtfulness, Positive Tone and Respectful Language, Correctness and Accuracy, Natural Language and Tone, Conciseness\n\nGiven the information above, please select either A or B:\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old : how are we sure that we all see the same colors ? I'm not sure how should I phrase it but lets give it a try. How are we sure that the color I see as green, for exemple, is the same color as someone else's green? Is it possible that the color I call green is an other color for someone else's eyes but we name it the same because we grew up with people naming this color \"green\"? I really hope im being clear enough\n\nA: This is actually a common philosophical question. You can read about it in books about consciousness such as I Am A Strange Loop. One thing to note though. Not only do we all agree on what color something is, everyone also shares a huge amount of connotations associated with the color. We all agree on what different colors and combinations mean, etc. In this way, our experience must be much the same. However, we ultimately don't know what someone's subjective experience is like. Someone else's experience, at its core, could be unimaginably alien to someone else.\n\nB: Color wheel would make no sense if humans generally didn’t experience the same qualia for a specific instance of sight How often do you see people complaining that it’s hard to perceive black text on a white background? Never, because no one’s black is perceived as something like a yellow\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will receive a Reddit post along with two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more favored by humans based on the following criteria:\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nAfter considering the given information, please indicate which comment is preferred: A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old : how are we sure that we all see the same colors ? I'm not sure how should I phrase it but lets give it a try. How are we sure that the color I see as green, for exemple, is the same color as someone else's green? Is it possible that the color I call green is an other color for someone else's eyes but we name it the same because we grew up with people naming this color \"green\"? I really hope im being clear enough\n\nA: This is actually a common philosophical question. You can read about it in books about consciousness such as I Am A Strange Loop. One thing to note though. Not only do we all agree on what color something is, everyone also shares a huge amount of connotations associated with the color. We all agree on what different colors and combinations mean, etc. In this way, our experience must be much the same. However, we ultimately don't know what someone's subjective experience is like. Someone else's experience, at its core, could be unimaginably alien to someone else.\n\nB: We can’t know for sure BUT we do have well documented, consistent psychological effects from different colors and color combinations This doesn’t prove anything but IMO its strong evidence we’re at least seeing the same shades\n\nPlease respond with either A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will receive a Reddit post along with two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more favored by humans based on the following criteria:\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nAfter considering the given information, please indicate which comment is preferred: A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: Why is it that it takes few seconds for our body to decide that it's had enough water not to be thirsty, but several minutes to recognize that no more food is needed cuz it's not hungry?\n\nA: Other people have answered it well enough but I want to throw out some notions of what 'hunger' is that may help people with weight gain problems. Youve probably heard about hunger \"being in the head\" and well, thats pretty much true. Hunger is not exactly a \"I need food\" signal, its a \"im currently not digesting food\" signal. Just because you FEEL hungry doesnt mean you HAVE to eat. You may well be perfectly fine and fed, and overeating can definitely cause inconsistencies to worsen. You can often ignore hunger and it will go away after some minutes, assuming you didnt actually need to eat. This is why its also healthier to eat less more often than the massive one off meals we normally eat, AND it helps lose weight because eating little bits keeps the hunger feeling away while potentially consuming less food overall. The receptors for hunger are all over, stomach activity, intestine activity, even just the motion of eating all provide signals for the brain to say \"im eating, or im fed\" and the hunger dissipates. Its completely separate from \"I need food im low on stuff\" But yes, as other said, with water its almost instant and is controlled mostly by the throat. And not particularly because you need water and have replenished it.\n\nB: Ive never experienced this. I feel full and don’t overeat unless I really want to. Maybe I’m just lucky.\n\nPlease respond with either A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will receive a Reddit post along with two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more favored by humans based on the following criteria:\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nAfter considering the given information, please indicate which comment is preferred: A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: Why is it that it takes few seconds for our body to decide that it's had enough water not to be thirsty, but several minutes to recognize that no more food is needed cuz it's not hungry?\n\nA: Other people have answered it well enough but I want to throw out some notions of what 'hunger' is that may help people with weight gain problems. Youve probably heard about hunger \"being in the head\" and well, thats pretty much true. Hunger is not exactly a \"I need food\" signal, its a \"im currently not digesting food\" signal. Just because you FEEL hungry doesnt mean you HAVE to eat. You may well be perfectly fine and fed, and overeating can definitely cause inconsistencies to worsen. You can often ignore hunger and it will go away after some minutes, assuming you didnt actually need to eat. This is why its also healthier to eat less more often than the massive one off meals we normally eat, AND it helps lose weight because eating little bits keeps the hunger feeling away while potentially consuming less food overall. The receptors for hunger are all over, stomach activity, intestine activity, even just the motion of eating all provide signals for the brain to say \"im eating, or im fed\" and the hunger dissipates. Its completely separate from \"I need food im low on stuff\" But yes, as other said, with water its almost instant and is controlled mostly by the throat. And not particularly because you need water and have replenished it.\n\nB: For both hunger and thirst we have multiple signals that tell us whether we have 'had enough'. For example, stomach dilation, salt or glucose levels in the bloodstream, etc. Unfortunately all of these have at least several minutes' lag (for hydration) or even a hour's lag (for glucose levels) and we often feel that we've had enough water or food before this happens. Psychologists believe therefore that the real reason we feel we've had enough is simply habit. We know roughly how much water to drink from previous experience, and how much food to eat. The reason you feel you've had enough water earlier that for food is simply that you have different drinking habits to eating habits. If you retrain yourself to stop eating after less food, you will feel full from food earlier.\n\nPlease respond with either A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be a given Reddit post and two comments for the Reddit post from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which of the comments is more preferred by human given the following criteria.\n\nYou need to consider following criteria\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nGiven above information, please answer which of the comment is more preferred by human, A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: Why is it that it takes few seconds for our body to decide that it's had enough water not to be thirsty, but several minutes to recognize that no more food is needed cuz it's not hungry?\n\nA: For both hunger and thirst we have multiple signals that tell us whether we have 'had enough'. For example, stomach dilation, salt or glucose levels in the bloodstream, etc. Unfortunately all of these have at least several minutes' lag (for hydration) or even a hour's lag (for glucose levels) and we often feel that we've had enough water or food before this happens. Psychologists believe therefore that the real reason we feel we've had enough is simply habit. We know roughly how much water to drink from previous experience, and how much food to eat. The reason you feel you've had enough water earlier that for food is simply that you have different drinking habits to eating habits. If you retrain yourself to stop eating after less food, you will feel full from food earlier.\n\nB: Ive never experienced this. I feel full and don’t overeat unless I really want to. Maybe I’m just lucky.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be a given Reddit post and two comments for the Reddit post from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which of the comments is more preferred by human given the following criteria.\n\nYou need to consider following criteria\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nGiven above information, please answer which of the comment is more preferred by human, A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old Why do people seem to age so incredibly fast after a traumatic experience? For example a woman I know seemed to have aged at least ten years in a very short time after her grandchild died in an accident.\n\nA: It might be appropriate to mention adverse childhood experiences, or ACEs. There are some interesting articles on Wikipedia on this and related topics, and TED talks from Sandra Bloom and Nadine Burke Harris. The basic notion is that childhood trauma can lead to long-term health problems like heart disease, diabetes and stroke. Hi mom!\n\nB: Simplifying to cortisol its not a good answer. Traumatic experiences causes lifestyle changes in a person, cortisol its part of this process, deteriorating the inmune system, causing sickness in the person which contributes to inflammation and immunosuppression, which can cause chronic diseases. the excessive hyperactive sympathetic nervous system suppress the parasympathetic system which generate a chronic feeling of being on edge, extremely nervous, anxious and too emotional, this promotes inflammation and impairs a person physically and emotionally this causes depression and other mental issues, this makes changes in habits like eating, causing things like anemia and malnutrition. which impairs the ability of the body to regenerate tissue for example. Sleeping gets also disrupted, which impairs process of detoxification and autophagy, generating a toxic load in the body of toxins and prevents the body to correctly detoxify, this also generates a chronic impaired circadian rhythm, which impairs a lot of systems in the body that work with the circadian rhythm, like the immune system for example, causing chronic inflammation and a malfunctioning immune system which is chronically releasing inflammatory cytokines. This also promotes sickness, virus, bacteria and fungus can enter the body of this people and generate chaos inside, because the body can´t properly deal with diseases, it generates an even heavier load of toxins, inflammation and a body that can´t properly get rid of this pathogens and much less stabilize itself, because its too occupied dealing with all of the inflammation, enough of this and the body starts to destroy tissue in an attempt to get rid of this pathogens, destroys cells, mitochondria and lowers bone density. all of this generates, excessive inflammation, malnutrition, immune suppression and autoimmunity if severe enough, this deteriorates the image of a person because the body isn´t working right and it is even destroying itself trying to fix the internal mess. usually when you fix this issues, a person can revert their metabolic age to their actual age, unless the damage done by this traumatic experiences have been chornic for a long time.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will receive a Reddit post along with two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more favored by humans based on the following criteria:\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nAfter considering the given information, please indicate which comment is preferred: A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old Why do people seem to age so incredibly fast after a traumatic experience? For example a woman I know seemed to have aged at least ten years in a very short time after her grandchild died in an accident.\n\nA: It might be appropriate to mention adverse childhood experiences, or ACEs. There are some interesting articles on Wikipedia on this and related topics, and TED talks from Sandra Bloom and Nadine Burke Harris. The basic notion is that childhood trauma can lead to long-term health problems like heart disease, diabetes and stroke. Hi mom!\n\nB: A lot of it is going to be physical cues that you pick up on. Rapid weight loss? The excess skin is going to be loose and thus have more wrinkles and look significantly older. Sleeping poorly over the last weeks? Emotionally exhausted? Person is going to be and look tired. Everything from posture to mannerisms to facial expressions will have less energy and thus look older. People go on about cortisol and stress hormones that they read about in a pseudoscientific health magazine about ageing, and while there's some truth to it most of the macroscopic changes you're picking up on are the result of fairly obvious behavioral shifts rather than some under the hood aging effect. You can make a reasonable argument that the stress hormones are the root cause for why the person isn't hungry or why they aren't sleeping well, but that isn't the same as the people saying it literally \"ages\" you.\n\nPlease respond with either A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be a given Reddit post and two comments for the Reddit post from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which of the comments is more preferred by human given the following criteria.\n\nYou need to consider following criteria\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nGiven above information, please answer which of the comment is more preferred by human, A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old Why do people seem to age so incredibly fast after a traumatic experience? For example a woman I know seemed to have aged at least ten years in a very short time after her grandchild died in an accident.\n\nA: Simplifying to cortisol its not a good answer. Traumatic experiences causes lifestyle changes in a person, cortisol its part of this process, deteriorating the inmune system, causing sickness in the person which contributes to inflammation and immunosuppression, which can cause chronic diseases. the excessive hyperactive sympathetic nervous system suppress the parasympathetic system which generate a chronic feeling of being on edge, extremely nervous, anxious and too emotional, this promotes inflammation and impairs a person physically and emotionally this causes depression and other mental issues, this makes changes in habits like eating, causing things like anemia and malnutrition. which impairs the ability of the body to regenerate tissue for example. Sleeping gets also disrupted, which impairs process of detoxification and autophagy, generating a toxic load in the body of toxins and prevents the body to correctly detoxify, this also generates a chronic impaired circadian rhythm, which impairs a lot of systems in the body that work with the circadian rhythm, like the immune system for example, causing chronic inflammation and a malfunctioning immune system which is chronically releasing inflammatory cytokines. This also promotes sickness, virus, bacteria and fungus can enter the body of this people and generate chaos inside, because the body can´t properly deal with diseases, it generates an even heavier load of toxins, inflammation and a body that can´t properly get rid of this pathogens and much less stabilize itself, because its too occupied dealing with all of the inflammation, enough of this and the body starts to destroy tissue in an attempt to get rid of this pathogens, destroys cells, mitochondria and lowers bone density. all of this generates, excessive inflammation, malnutrition, immune suppression and autoimmunity if severe enough, this deteriorates the image of a person because the body isn´t working right and it is even destroying itself trying to fix the internal mess. usually when you fix this issues, a person can revert their metabolic age to their actual age, unless the damage done by this traumatic experiences have been chornic for a long time.\n\nB: I hate that. I once got ordered to fix an mechanical error in a snack machine because i was in IT. Edit. Clicked on the wrong post. Edit 2. Thanks for the F award!\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be provided with a Reddit post and two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more preferred by humans based on the following criteria: Relevance to the Post, Clarity and Coherence, Depth and Thoughtfulness, Positive Tone and Respectful Language, Correctness and Accuracy, Natural Language and Tone, Conciseness\n\nGiven the information above, please select either A or B:\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old Why do people seem to age so incredibly fast after a traumatic experience? For example a woman I know seemed to have aged at least ten years in a very short time after her grandchild died in an accident.\n\nA: I hate that. I once got ordered to fix an mechanical error in a snack machine because i was in IT. Edit. Clicked on the wrong post. Edit 2. Thanks for the F award!\n\nB: Another factor about \"aging\" is that it is not a set process. I work in Physical Therapy and I say you are building your 80 year old body now. How well you age depends largely on lifestyle. If you are depressed, you won't eat as well, exercise, etc., not to mention that you simply won't want to get out of bed. That will cause a constellation of symptoms that we think of as aging. Entropy is to be expected, but if you are taking care of your health and engaged in life, that entropy will take longer to set in, barring catastrophic illness or injury.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be provided with a Reddit post and two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more preferred by humans based on the following criteria: Relevance to the Post, Clarity and Coherence, Depth and Thoughtfulness, Positive Tone and Respectful Language, Correctness and Accuracy, Natural Language and Tone, Conciseness\n\nGiven the information above, please select either A or B:\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old Why do people seem to age so incredibly fast after a traumatic experience? For example a woman I know seemed to have aged at least ten years in a very short time after her grandchild died in an accident.\n\nA: A lot of it is going to be physical cues that you pick up on. Rapid weight loss? The excess skin is going to be loose and thus have more wrinkles and look significantly older. Sleeping poorly over the last weeks? Emotionally exhausted? Person is going to be and look tired. Everything from posture to mannerisms to facial expressions will have less energy and thus look older. People go on about cortisol and stress hormones that they read about in a pseudoscientific health magazine about ageing, and while there's some truth to it most of the macroscopic changes you're picking up on are the result of fairly obvious behavioral shifts rather than some under the hood aging effect. You can make a reasonable argument that the stress hormones are the root cause for why the person isn't hungry or why they aren't sleeping well, but that isn't the same as the people saying it literally \"ages\" you.\n\nB: I hate that. I once got ordered to fix an mechanical error in a snack machine because i was in IT. Edit. Clicked on the wrong post. Edit 2. Thanks for the F award!\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be provided with a Reddit post and two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more preferred by humans based on the following criteria: Relevance to the Post, Clarity and Coherence, Depth and Thoughtfulness, Positive Tone and Respectful Language, Correctness and Accuracy, Natural Language and Tone, Conciseness\n\nGiven the information above, please select either A or B:\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old Why do people seem to age so incredibly fast after a traumatic experience? For example a woman I know seemed to have aged at least ten years in a very short time after her grandchild died in an accident.\n\nA: Simplifying to cortisol its not a good answer. Traumatic experiences causes lifestyle changes in a person, cortisol its part of this process, deteriorating the inmune system, causing sickness in the person which contributes to inflammation and immunosuppression, which can cause chronic diseases. the excessive hyperactive sympathetic nervous system suppress the parasympathetic system which generate a chronic feeling of being on edge, extremely nervous, anxious and too emotional, this promotes inflammation and impairs a person physically and emotionally this causes depression and other mental issues, this makes changes in habits like eating, causing things like anemia and malnutrition. which impairs the ability of the body to regenerate tissue for example. Sleeping gets also disrupted, which impairs process of detoxification and autophagy, generating a toxic load in the body of toxins and prevents the body to correctly detoxify, this also generates a chronic impaired circadian rhythm, which impairs a lot of systems in the body that work with the circadian rhythm, like the immune system for example, causing chronic inflammation and a malfunctioning immune system which is chronically releasing inflammatory cytokines. This also promotes sickness, virus, bacteria and fungus can enter the body of this people and generate chaos inside, because the body can´t properly deal with diseases, it generates an even heavier load of toxins, inflammation and a body that can´t properly get rid of this pathogens and much less stabilize itself, because its too occupied dealing with all of the inflammation, enough of this and the body starts to destroy tissue in an attempt to get rid of this pathogens, destroys cells, mitochondria and lowers bone density. all of this generates, excessive inflammation, malnutrition, immune suppression and autoimmunity if severe enough, this deteriorates the image of a person because the body isn´t working right and it is even destroying itself trying to fix the internal mess. usually when you fix this issues, a person can revert their metabolic age to their actual age, unless the damage done by this traumatic experiences have been chornic for a long time.\n\nB: A lot of it is going to be physical cues that you pick up on. Rapid weight loss? The excess skin is going to be loose and thus have more wrinkles and look significantly older. Sleeping poorly over the last weeks? Emotionally exhausted? Person is going to be and look tired. Everything from posture to mannerisms to facial expressions will have less energy and thus look older. People go on about cortisol and stress hormones that they read about in a pseudoscientific health magazine about ageing, and while there's some truth to it most of the macroscopic changes you're picking up on are the result of fairly obvious behavioral shifts rather than some under the hood aging effect. You can make a reasonable argument that the stress hormones are the root cause for why the person isn't hungry or why they aren't sleeping well, but that isn't the same as the people saying it literally \"ages\" you.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will receive a Reddit post along with two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more favored by humans based on the following criteria:\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nAfter considering the given information, please indicate which comment is preferred: A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old Why do people seem to age so incredibly fast after a traumatic experience? For example a woman I know seemed to have aged at least ten years in a very short time after her grandchild died in an accident.\n\nA: A lot of it is going to be physical cues that you pick up on. Rapid weight loss? The excess skin is going to be loose and thus have more wrinkles and look significantly older. Sleeping poorly over the last weeks? Emotionally exhausted? Person is going to be and look tired. Everything from posture to mannerisms to facial expressions will have less energy and thus look older. People go on about cortisol and stress hormones that they read about in a pseudoscientific health magazine about ageing, and while there's some truth to it most of the macroscopic changes you're picking up on are the result of fairly obvious behavioral shifts rather than some under the hood aging effect. You can make a reasonable argument that the stress hormones are the root cause for why the person isn't hungry or why they aren't sleeping well, but that isn't the same as the people saying it literally \"ages\" you.\n\nB: Another factor about \"aging\" is that it is not a set process. I work in Physical Therapy and I say you are building your 80 year old body now. How well you age depends largely on lifestyle. If you are depressed, you won't eat as well, exercise, etc., not to mention that you simply won't want to get out of bed. That will cause a constellation of symptoms that we think of as aging. Entropy is to be expected, but if you are taking care of your health and engaged in life, that entropy will take longer to set in, barring catastrophic illness or injury.\n\nPlease respond with either A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be a given Reddit post and two comments for the Reddit post from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which of the comments is more preferred by human given the following criteria.\n\nYou need to consider following criteria\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nGiven above information, please answer which of the comment is more preferred by human, A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: What actually happens when we unintentionally start to drift off to sleep but our body suddenly \"shocks\" us awake?\n\nA: From my understanding of some theoretical model of how sleep works, and explained in the way a 5-year-old who understands enough to ask this question: ​ The different parts of your brains that control what you do talk to each other through waves of electricity when you're awake. When you start to sleep, one big sleep wave goes over your whole brain so the different parts of your brain can't hear each other anymore over this big wave. When you feel like you're falling asleep little by little, almost rhythmically, that is the sleep wave trying over and over again to stop the parts of your brain from talking to each other. When you suddenly wake yourself, that's one or more parts of your brain sending waves out \"louder\" because they don't know why they can't talk to the other parts anymore. Then the big sleep wave has to try again, and hopefully it will stop all of the different parts of the brain from talking to each other, so there's just one big, rhythmic wave and you can get some sleep! ​ **^(EDIT:)** ^(Formatting, and a few extra words for clarity.)\n\nB: I have read that if you go to sleep \"too hard\" and your body functions go down too much, your body tries to jumpstart you back to consciousness so that you can evaluate if there is a problem.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be provided with a Reddit post and two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more preferred by humans based on the following criteria: Relevance to the Post, Clarity and Coherence, Depth and Thoughtfulness, Positive Tone and Respectful Language, Correctness and Accuracy, Natural Language and Tone, Conciseness\n\nGiven the information above, please select either A or B:\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: What actually happens when we unintentionally start to drift off to sleep but our body suddenly \"shocks\" us awake?\n\nA: I have read that if you go to sleep \"too hard\" and your body functions go down too much, your body tries to jumpstart you back to consciousness so that you can evaluate if there is a problem.\n\nB: I work in neuro and I don't know the answer to this. Scrolling through the first few top comments I'm seeing wildly different answers. Rather than further misinformation, I'll just interpret the wikipedia entry: Looks like the reaction is not understood, but is probably the activation of the \"reflex to stay upright\". When your muscles relax when you fall asleep, it may accidentally be interpreted as weightlessness (falling), which may trigger the response. So if anyone knows more than this, rather than spread dubious information, please update the wiki with your sources.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will receive a Reddit post along with two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more favored by humans based on the following criteria:\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nAfter considering the given information, please indicate which comment is preferred: A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: When you restart a PC, does it completely \"shut down\"? If it does, what tells it to power up again? If it doesn't, why does it behave like it has been shut down?\n\nA: No, restart and shutdown are different and there are separate power level commands implemented by each. When restarting your computer doesn't shut down first. When the computer is shutdown, the OS will send a shutdown command to the BIOS using the appropriate driver, the BIOS will then send a command to attached devices to place them in a safe working mode, hard drives will park their read write heads to avoid damage. Once the devices report ready and everything is made safe the BIOS will send a signal to the power supply to terminate power to most attached devices and enter standby power mode. Even when shutdown ATX and above will maintain a standby power to the motherboard when plugged in. This allows external devices to power on the machine. Flicking the switch or removing the power cord will remove all power but the power supply itself remains charged with residual current so never open it up. During a restart devices such as the hard drive will not park and will continue to be active, certain POST operations may be skipped. There is a special ATX power signal used to move from standby to full power. The cases switch is wired into a molex connector onto the motherboard, when you press the switch it operates the pins that generate this power signal.\n\nB: Explain like I'm five years old answer When you restart a PC, it does not shut down completely. Someone used a metaphor for a chef so I'll use that too. Shutting down completely would be like if the chef cleaned up and went home. Holding the power button down to shut down faster would be like if the chef didn't clean up and just left a mess and went home. Restarting the computer is telling the chef to clean up everything and then set everything back up without him leaving the building. So, it's not totally \"shut off\" in that sense because the chef is still there to set things back up, and he knew that was the plan in advance!\n\nPlease respond with either A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be a given Reddit post and two comments for the Reddit post from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which of the comments is more preferred by human given the following criteria.\n\nYou need to consider following criteria\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nGiven above information, please answer which of the comment is more preferred by human, A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: When you restart a PC, does it completely \"shut down\"? If it does, what tells it to power up again? If it doesn't, why does it behave like it has been shut down?\n\nA: Explain like I'm five years old answer When you restart a PC, it does not shut down completely. Someone used a metaphor for a chef so I'll use that too. Shutting down completely would be like if the chef cleaned up and went home. Holding the power button down to shut down faster would be like if the chef didn't clean up and just left a mess and went home. Restarting the computer is telling the chef to clean up everything and then set everything back up without him leaving the building. So, it's not totally \"shut off\" in that sense because the chef is still there to set things back up, and he knew that was the plan in advance!\n\nB: Every CPU has a start up routine. Similar to a chef setting up his kitchen before he starts cooking (cleaning, placing the pots & pans & ingredients in the right location etc.) then he starts cooking. The reset button just tells the CPU to start that routine. So to compare, let’s say the chef was in the middle of making pasta, but got a reset. He would clean his kitchen and start cooking from scratch again. Well, what is the difference between an intitial boot and a reset? It is nothing. The list of activities that a CPU needs to do before it can start executing other programs is defined at a certain address. Let’s say $0000. When the computer is turned on, it is hardwired to start following instructions from address $0000 onwards. During the execution of code, the processor keeps track where he is (same as following steps in a receipe) with a counter called a ‘program counter’. What the reset button is pressed, it writes $0000 to the program counter making the CPU think it was just turned on.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be a given Reddit post and two comments for the Reddit post from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which of the comments is more preferred by human given the following criteria.\n\nYou need to consider following criteria\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nGiven above information, please answer which of the comment is more preferred by human, A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: When you restart a PC, does it completely \"shut down\"? If it does, what tells it to power up again? If it doesn't, why does it behave like it has been shut down?\n\nA: There is additional story on software side of things. For shutdown, Windows, for example, uses hibernation (save to disk) for a lot of kernel code instead of tearing it down, to speed-up next startup. But for restart Windows makes complete teardown and rebuild of all kernel structures, because you usually request restart for updates and configurations, it's not a part of normal operation. More info\n\nB: No, restart and shutdown are different and there are separate power level commands implemented by each. When restarting your computer doesn't shut down first. When the computer is shutdown, the OS will send a shutdown command to the BIOS using the appropriate driver, the BIOS will then send a command to attached devices to place them in a safe working mode, hard drives will park their read write heads to avoid damage. Once the devices report ready and everything is made safe the BIOS will send a signal to the power supply to terminate power to most attached devices and enter standby power mode. Even when shutdown ATX and above will maintain a standby power to the motherboard when plugged in. This allows external devices to power on the machine. Flicking the switch or removing the power cord will remove all power but the power supply itself remains charged with residual current so never open it up. During a restart devices such as the hard drive will not park and will continue to be active, certain POST operations may be skipped. There is a special ATX power signal used to move from standby to full power. The cases switch is wired into a molex connector onto the motherboard, when you press the switch it operates the pins that generate this power signal.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be provided with a Reddit post and two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more preferred by humans based on the following criteria: Relevance to the Post, Clarity and Coherence, Depth and Thoughtfulness, Positive Tone and Respectful Language, Correctness and Accuracy, Natural Language and Tone, Conciseness\n\nGiven the information above, please select either A or B:\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: When you restart a PC, does it completely \"shut down\"? If it does, what tells it to power up again? If it doesn't, why does it behave like it has been shut down?\n\nA: There is additional story on software side of things. For shutdown, Windows, for example, uses hibernation (save to disk) for a lot of kernel code instead of tearing it down, to speed-up next startup. But for restart Windows makes complete teardown and rebuild of all kernel structures, because you usually request restart for updates and configurations, it's not a part of normal operation. More info\n\nB: Every CPU has a start up routine. Similar to a chef setting up his kitchen before he starts cooking (cleaning, placing the pots & pans & ingredients in the right location etc.) then he starts cooking. The reset button just tells the CPU to start that routine. So to compare, let’s say the chef was in the middle of making pasta, but got a reset. He would clean his kitchen and start cooking from scratch again. Well, what is the difference between an intitial boot and a reset? It is nothing. The list of activities that a CPU needs to do before it can start executing other programs is defined at a certain address. Let’s say $0000. When the computer is turned on, it is hardwired to start following instructions from address $0000 onwards. During the execution of code, the processor keeps track where he is (same as following steps in a receipe) with a counter called a ‘program counter’. What the reset button is pressed, it writes $0000 to the program counter making the CPU think it was just turned on.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be provided with a Reddit post and two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more preferred by humans based on the following criteria: Relevance to the Post, Clarity and Coherence, Depth and Thoughtfulness, Positive Tone and Respectful Language, Correctness and Accuracy, Natural Language and Tone, Conciseness\n\nGiven the information above, please select either A or B:\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: When you restart a PC, does it completely \"shut down\"? If it does, what tells it to power up again? If it doesn't, why does it behave like it has been shut down?\n\nA: Every CPU has a start up routine. Similar to a chef setting up his kitchen before he starts cooking (cleaning, placing the pots & pans & ingredients in the right location etc.) then he starts cooking. The reset button just tells the CPU to start that routine. So to compare, let’s say the chef was in the middle of making pasta, but got a reset. He would clean his kitchen and start cooking from scratch again. Well, what is the difference between an intitial boot and a reset? It is nothing. The list of activities that a CPU needs to do before it can start executing other programs is defined at a certain address. Let’s say $0000. When the computer is turned on, it is hardwired to start following instructions from address $0000 onwards. During the execution of code, the processor keeps track where he is (same as following steps in a receipe) with a counter called a ‘program counter’. What the reset button is pressed, it writes $0000 to the program counter making the CPU think it was just turned on.\n\nB: No, restart and shutdown are different and there are separate power level commands implemented by each. When restarting your computer doesn't shut down first. When the computer is shutdown, the OS will send a shutdown command to the BIOS using the appropriate driver, the BIOS will then send a command to attached devices to place them in a safe working mode, hard drives will park their read write heads to avoid damage. Once the devices report ready and everything is made safe the BIOS will send a signal to the power supply to terminate power to most attached devices and enter standby power mode. Even when shutdown ATX and above will maintain a standby power to the motherboard when plugged in. This allows external devices to power on the machine. Flicking the switch or removing the power cord will remove all power but the power supply itself remains charged with residual current so never open it up. During a restart devices such as the hard drive will not park and will continue to be active, certain POST operations may be skipped. There is a special ATX power signal used to move from standby to full power. The cases switch is wired into a molex connector onto the motherboard, when you press the switch it operates the pins that generate this power signal.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be a given Reddit post and two comments for the Reddit post from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which of the comments is more preferred by human given the following criteria.\n\nYou need to consider following criteria\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nGiven above information, please answer which of the comment is more preferred by human, A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How can the same side of the moon always face earth? Doesn't it rotate? The fact that the Chinese just landed on the dark side makes it seem stranger.\n\nA: It does rotate, but it rotates at the same speed as it orbits. As it moves around us, the same side keeps facing us. It's almost like it's circling a boss fight, looking for an opening...\n\nB: It’s due to a phenomenon known as TIDAL LOCKING. This happens when 1. a moon (or any celestial object) orbits another object at a close enough distance, so.. 2. ..the gravity of the “host” object is strong enough to pull one side of the moon towards it in such a way that.. 3. ...the moon rotates at the same rate as it orbits In half a rotation, the moon would have turned 180 degrees and showed its other side. But at the same time, it went 180 degrees around the Earth, so now the other side of the earth sees the same side. Here’s a handy gif ! The one we actually see is the one on the left. The one on the right is what it would look like IF the Moon weren’t tidally locked. Also, the “dark side” of the Moon is misleading! Both sides of the Moon can be lit up or in darkness, depending on the time of month. On a Full Moon, the face you see is bright. On a New Moon, the face you see is dark. What most people mean by “dark side” is generally the side not facing the Earth. (Edit: 180 degrees, forgive my 3am high ass brain) Edit: so here’s some extra explanations about the mechanism of tidal locking: I actually simplified the answer a lot. It’s not about one side experiencing a stronger force, it’s about one AXIS of the Moon experiencing stronger force. Just like how the oceans facing the Moon experience high tide as they are pulled towards it, the Earth itself is pulled towards the Moon. Thus, the Oceans on the opposite side also experience high tide. It’s this ‘bulging’ effect that effects the spin of a body. Back when the moon was molten rock, this bulging was large enough to ‘lock’ its rotation the way it is today. Here’s a pic! Edit: the dumb mobile app isn’t showing any new responses after yesterday. I might have made a few errors in the explanation, so please DM me if there’s any edits I should make to clear things up!\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be a given Reddit post and two comments for the Reddit post from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which of the comments is more preferred by human given the following criteria.\n\nYou need to consider following criteria\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nGiven above information, please answer which of the comment is more preferred by human, A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How can the same side of the moon always face earth? Doesn't it rotate? The fact that the Chinese just landed on the dark side makes it seem stranger.\n\nA: It does rotate, but it rotates at the same speed as it orbits. As it moves around us, the same side keeps facing us. It's almost like it's circling a boss fight, looking for an opening...\n\nB: Here’s a visual. It’s called synchronous rotation. The left animation is how our moon moves. The right animation would be if it had zero rotation. You can see in the left image how the same face is always pointing towards Earth. This is because the time it takes to make one orbit around Earth is nearly equal to the time it takes to make one rotation about its axis.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will receive a Reddit post along with two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more favored by humans based on the following criteria:\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nAfter considering the given information, please indicate which comment is preferred: A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How can the same side of the moon always face earth? Doesn't it rotate? The fact that the Chinese just landed on the dark side makes it seem stranger.\n\nA: Here’s a visual. It’s called synchronous rotation. The left animation is how our moon moves. The right animation would be if it had zero rotation. You can see in the left image how the same face is always pointing towards Earth. This is because the time it takes to make one orbit around Earth is nearly equal to the time it takes to make one rotation about its axis.\n\nB: Do this: Stand face-to-face with a friend. Walk around them in a circle, but make sure you keep facing the same direction. You've just revolved around them without rotating, or orbited without spinning. Now, do the same thing again, but keep facing your friend as you go around them. You've just revolved AND rotated. In other words, you orbited while spinning. This is how the moon orbits the Earth. The real thing is a little more complicated, because the Earth revolves at a different rate than the moon does (which is why the moon goes through phases,) but the important thing for your question is that the moon rotates at the same rate it revolves around the Earth due to being tidally locked, which others have described better than I could.\n\nPlease respond with either A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be provided with a Reddit post and two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more preferred by humans based on the following criteria: Relevance to the Post, Clarity and Coherence, Depth and Thoughtfulness, Positive Tone and Respectful Language, Correctness and Accuracy, Natural Language and Tone, Conciseness\n\nGiven the information above, please select either A or B:\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How can the same side of the moon always face earth? Doesn't it rotate? The fact that the Chinese just landed on the dark side makes it seem stranger.\n\nA: The moon does one rotation every month, therefore it's synced up to always have the same side facing the Earth. This is actually the norm for most moons and small bodies in the solar system. The term \"dark side\" is a misnomer, it experiences a day/night cycle every month like the rest of the surface of the Moon, but it's known as the dark side because it's always obscured to us. Operating there is difficult because you lose line-of-sight communications, so you need some sort of relay satellite if you want to send a machine there. All the Apollo missions and most robotic lunar landing missions have landed on the near-side of the Moon. That's why this Chinese landing is especially exciting, they will explore the far side in more detail than has been achieved before.\n\nB: Here’s a visual. It’s called synchronous rotation. The left animation is how our moon moves. The right animation would be if it had zero rotation. You can see in the left image how the same face is always pointing towards Earth. This is because the time it takes to make one orbit around Earth is nearly equal to the time it takes to make one rotation about its axis.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be a given Reddit post and two comments for the Reddit post from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which of the comments is more preferred by human given the following criteria.\n\nYou need to consider following criteria\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nGiven above information, please answer which of the comment is more preferred by human, A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How can the same side of the moon always face earth? Doesn't it rotate? The fact that the Chinese just landed on the dark side makes it seem stranger.\n\nA: Here’s a visual. It’s called synchronous rotation. The left animation is how our moon moves. The right animation would be if it had zero rotation. You can see in the left image how the same face is always pointing towards Earth. This is because the time it takes to make one orbit around Earth is nearly equal to the time it takes to make one rotation about its axis.\n\nB: So imagine you stood in your garden with a hula hoop around you. And you friend was helping to make it look like you can hula hoop by pulling on the hula hoop so that it is constantly tight to your waist, and they are side stepping around you in a large circle so the hula hoop fully circles around you like it does when hula hooping. Your friend would be constantly facing you while they hold on to the hoop. That friend would be like the moon and you'd be like the earth. They would travel the perimeter of a full circle around you with you at the center at the same time as they would complete a full 360 degree spin themselves (as in they would start of facing North, then East, South, West and back to North). One of there spins around you would take about a month. In the meantime you can independently spin on the spot on much faster (1 day) than he is side stepping around you. You would only ever see his face when you look at him but he would be able to see your front, side and back.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be provided with a Reddit post and two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more preferred by humans based on the following criteria: Relevance to the Post, Clarity and Coherence, Depth and Thoughtfulness, Positive Tone and Respectful Language, Correctness and Accuracy, Natural Language and Tone, Conciseness\n\nGiven the information above, please select either A or B:\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How can the same side of the moon always face earth? Doesn't it rotate? The fact that the Chinese just landed on the dark side makes it seem stranger.\n\nA: Here’s a visual. It’s called synchronous rotation. The left animation is how our moon moves. The right animation would be if it had zero rotation. You can see in the left image how the same face is always pointing towards Earth. This is because the time it takes to make one orbit around Earth is nearly equal to the time it takes to make one rotation about its axis.\n\nB: You can sorta imagine that the moon is swung around on a large, invisible rope that's connected to the side facing us. It no longer rotates at a rate faster than it orbits around us. We call this being \"tidal locking\". It actually happens not all too uncommonly in space. Pluto and one of its moons are both tidally locked to each other where Pluto actually rotates about a point that isn't its own axis, always facing that moon with the same side in the process. Again, using the swinging rope analogy, imagine that you're swinging something so heavy that you actually lean back to prevent yourself from falling over while swinging it. That's basically what Pluto is doing.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will receive a Reddit post along with two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more favored by humans based on the following criteria:\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nAfter considering the given information, please indicate which comment is preferred: A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How can the same side of the moon always face earth? Doesn't it rotate? The fact that the Chinese just landed on the dark side makes it seem stranger.\n\nA: This video explains it very nicely.\n\nB: The Moon rotates just like most other objects in space. However, the time it takes to rotate is exactly the same as it takes to go around the Earth. From our perspective, the same side is always facing us. The process by which this is maintained is called Tidal Locking.\n\nPlease respond with either A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be a given Reddit post and two comments for the Reddit post from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which of the comments is more preferred by human given the following criteria.\n\nYou need to consider following criteria\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nGiven above information, please answer which of the comment is more preferred by human, A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How can the same side of the moon always face earth? Doesn't it rotate? The fact that the Chinese just landed on the dark side makes it seem stranger.\n\nA: The Moon rotates just like most other objects in space. However, the time it takes to rotate is exactly the same as it takes to go around the Earth. From our perspective, the same side is always facing us. The process by which this is maintained is called Tidal Locking.\n\nB: Imagine you're holding both hands in a room with a friend dancing and spinning around each other. If someone else is in the room (as the sun), each of you will appear to be spinning but you two are always facing each other as you are turning at the same rate.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be a given Reddit post and two comments for the Reddit post from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which of the comments is more preferred by human given the following criteria.\n\nYou need to consider following criteria\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nGiven above information, please answer which of the comment is more preferred by human, A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How can the same side of the moon always face earth? Doesn't it rotate? The fact that the Chinese just landed on the dark side makes it seem stranger.\n\nA: It does so because it rotates. Specifically one rotation of its axis is equal to one orbit around earth. Thus the same side always faces earth as it is turning toward earth as it orbits.\n\nB: The Moon rotates just like most other objects in space. However, the time it takes to rotate is exactly the same as it takes to go around the Earth. From our perspective, the same side is always facing us. The process by which this is maintained is called Tidal Locking.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be a given Reddit post and two comments for the Reddit post from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which of the comments is more preferred by human given the following criteria.\n\nYou need to consider following criteria\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nGiven above information, please answer which of the comment is more preferred by human, A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How can the same side of the moon always face earth? Doesn't it rotate? The fact that the Chinese just landed on the dark side makes it seem stranger.\n\nA: Do this: Stand face-to-face with a friend. Walk around them in a circle, but make sure you keep facing the same direction. You've just revolved around them without rotating, or orbited without spinning. Now, do the same thing again, but keep facing your friend as you go around them. You've just revolved AND rotated. In other words, you orbited while spinning. This is how the moon orbits the Earth. The real thing is a little more complicated, because the Earth revolves at a different rate than the moon does (which is why the moon goes through phases,) but the important thing for your question is that the moon rotates at the same rate it revolves around the Earth due to being tidally locked, which others have described better than I could.\n\nB: The Moon rotates just like most other objects in space. However, the time it takes to rotate is exactly the same as it takes to go around the Earth. From our perspective, the same side is always facing us. The process by which this is maintained is called Tidal Locking.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will receive a Reddit post along with two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more favored by humans based on the following criteria:\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nAfter considering the given information, please indicate which comment is preferred: A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How can the same side of the moon always face earth? Doesn't it rotate? The fact that the Chinese just landed on the dark side makes it seem stranger.\n\nA: The Moon rotates just like most other objects in space. However, the time it takes to rotate is exactly the same as it takes to go around the Earth. From our perspective, the same side is always facing us. The process by which this is maintained is called Tidal Locking.\n\nB: Like someone else said, this is because the moon is \"tidally locked.\" This just means that, because the closest part of the moon (the side facing us) experiences more gravity than the far side (because gravity gets weaker with distance), this difference (called a gradient) makes the moon bulge in one direction like a tennis ball being squished. The bulges like to be lined up with earth, because it puts more of the moon closer to earth (lower potential energy). If you were to turn the moon to one side, you'd be lifting up one of the bulges further from the earth which would take extra energy. Now you might be saying \"but this also lowers the bulge on the other side closer to earth! This should balance out!\" You're right, but since the bulge on the other side is further from earth, there's less force from gravity on it, which means there's more force trying to keep the bulges aligned with earth (and one side facing earth) than there is trying to turn them away.\n\nPlease respond with either A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be provided with a Reddit post and two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more preferred by humans based on the following criteria: Relevance to the Post, Clarity and Coherence, Depth and Thoughtfulness, Positive Tone and Respectful Language, Correctness and Accuracy, Natural Language and Tone, Conciseness\n\nGiven the information above, please select either A or B:\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How can the same side of the moon always face earth? Doesn't it rotate? The fact that the Chinese just landed on the dark side makes it seem stranger.\n\nA: The Moon rotates just like most other objects in space. However, the time it takes to rotate is exactly the same as it takes to go around the Earth. From our perspective, the same side is always facing us. The process by which this is maintained is called Tidal Locking.\n\nB: Wow a lot of explanations suck. Ill try. Its tidally locked. It does rotate. Sit in a chair. Stick your foot out. That's the sun. Make a fist and hold it somewhere between your head and your foot. Thats the earth. Take your other hand, leave it open with your palm facing your the fist. Thats the moon. Make big/wide circular orbits around the fist keeping your palm facing the fist at all times. You will see that you need to rotate your open hand in order to have your palm facing your fist. Thats a tidal lock. You can also see that your foot has a line of sight (sunshine) to any part of your open hand at some point during each orbit. Thats the moons day night cycle. You may notice that one full rotation of your open hand occurs every time you complete one full orbit. Thats how long a rotation the moon takes, because its tidally locked. Result is the same as the moon. One side always faces the earth. The moon has day and night cycles, they're just really really long (the time it takes to orbit the earth, about 27 days IIRC) Edit: Thank you for the gold! I'm glad people liked the explanation.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be a given Reddit post and two comments for the Reddit post from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which of the comments is more preferred by human given the following criteria.\n\nYou need to consider following criteria\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nGiven above information, please answer which of the comment is more preferred by human, A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How can the same side of the moon always face earth? Doesn't it rotate? The fact that the Chinese just landed on the dark side makes it seem stranger.\n\nA: Imagine putting an egg in a bucket of water, one side would always float upwards because it's unevenly shaped, right? Well, that's true even if you were to pick the bucket up and swing it around you in circles, except now the top of the egg is always facing *inward*, instead of just always facing up. The Moon is like that egg, in that one side of it is heavier than the other. And just like the egg floating free in the swinging bucket, the heavy side is always going to face inward.\n\nB: The Moon rotates just like most other objects in space. However, the time it takes to rotate is exactly the same as it takes to go around the Earth. From our perspective, the same side is always facing us. The process by which this is maintained is called Tidal Locking.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will receive a Reddit post along with two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more favored by humans based on the following criteria:\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nAfter considering the given information, please indicate which comment is preferred: A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How can the same side of the moon always face earth? Doesn't it rotate? The fact that the Chinese just landed on the dark side makes it seem stranger.\n\nA: The Moon rotates just like most other objects in space. However, the time it takes to rotate is exactly the same as it takes to go around the Earth. From our perspective, the same side is always facing us. The process by which this is maintained is called Tidal Locking.\n\nB: The moon is tidal locked, and egg shaped. It doesn't freely rotate, because gravity pulls its heavy side always towards earth. I am reading a lot of \"the moon rotates, but perfectly aligned with the earth so we only see one side\" comments, which is false. Any \"rotation\" the moon makes, is because it's heavy side (the side we see) is always pulled towards earth, and that's about it. Tl;Dr The moon has a heavy side and that is always pulled towards earth's gravity. No rotation in the conventional ways we know.\n\nPlease respond with either A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be a given Reddit post and two comments for the Reddit post from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which of the comments is more preferred by human given the following criteria.\n\nYou need to consider following criteria\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nGiven above information, please answer which of the comment is more preferred by human, A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How can the same side of the moon always face earth? Doesn't it rotate? The fact that the Chinese just landed on the dark side makes it seem stranger.\n\nA: Most people have answered this question with tidal locking, but the reason this happens to our moon is just as interesting in my opinion: Over time gravity has stretched the moon out into a slight egg shape, just enough that the earths gravity will pull hard enough on the side nearest to it so that if the moon’s rotation ever gets out of phase with the earth, the force of gravity on this front side will pull it back into place. The moon is essentially always doing small oscillations based on where this front side of the egg is in relation to the earth.\n\nB: The Moon rotates just like most other objects in space. However, the time it takes to rotate is exactly the same as it takes to go around the Earth. From our perspective, the same side is always facing us. The process by which this is maintained is called Tidal Locking.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be provided with a Reddit post and two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more preferred by humans based on the following criteria: Relevance to the Post, Clarity and Coherence, Depth and Thoughtfulness, Positive Tone and Respectful Language, Correctness and Accuracy, Natural Language and Tone, Conciseness\n\nGiven the information above, please select either A or B:\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How can the same side of the moon always face earth? Doesn't it rotate? The fact that the Chinese just landed on the dark side makes it seem stranger.\n\nA: The Moon rotates just like most other objects in space. However, the time it takes to rotate is exactly the same as it takes to go around the Earth. From our perspective, the same side is always facing us. The process by which this is maintained is called Tidal Locking.\n\nB: The moon does one rotation every month, therefore it's synced up to always have the same side facing the Earth. This is actually the norm for most moons and small bodies in the solar system. The term \"dark side\" is a misnomer, it experiences a day/night cycle every month like the rest of the surface of the Moon, but it's known as the dark side because it's always obscured to us. Operating there is difficult because you lose line-of-sight communications, so you need some sort of relay satellite if you want to send a machine there. All the Apollo missions and most robotic lunar landing missions have landed on the near-side of the Moon. That's why this Chinese landing is especially exciting, they will explore the far side in more detail than has been achieved before.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will receive a Reddit post along with two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more favored by humans based on the following criteria:\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nAfter considering the given information, please indicate which comment is preferred: A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How can the same side of the moon always face earth? Doesn't it rotate? The fact that the Chinese just landed on the dark side makes it seem stranger.\n\nA: So imagine you stood in your garden with a hula hoop around you. And you friend was helping to make it look like you can hula hoop by pulling on the hula hoop so that it is constantly tight to your waist, and they are side stepping around you in a large circle so the hula hoop fully circles around you like it does when hula hooping. Your friend would be constantly facing you while they hold on to the hoop. That friend would be like the moon and you'd be like the earth. They would travel the perimeter of a full circle around you with you at the center at the same time as they would complete a full 360 degree spin themselves (as in they would start of facing North, then East, South, West and back to North). One of there spins around you would take about a month. In the meantime you can independently spin on the spot on much faster (1 day) than he is side stepping around you. You would only ever see his face when you look at him but he would be able to see your front, side and back.\n\nB: The Moon rotates just like most other objects in space. However, the time it takes to rotate is exactly the same as it takes to go around the Earth. From our perspective, the same side is always facing us. The process by which this is maintained is called Tidal Locking.\n\nPlease respond with either A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will receive a Reddit post along with two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more favored by humans based on the following criteria:\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nAfter considering the given information, please indicate which comment is preferred: A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How can the same side of the moon always face earth? Doesn't it rotate? The fact that the Chinese just landed on the dark side makes it seem stranger.\n\nA: The Moon rotates just like most other objects in space. However, the time it takes to rotate is exactly the same as it takes to go around the Earth. From our perspective, the same side is always facing us. The process by which this is maintained is called Tidal Locking.\n\nB: It’s because the moon rotates once every 28 days and makes one trip around the earth once every 28 days. So it is rotating but we only see the one side of it. At least that’s what my earth science teacher taught me.\n\nPlease respond with either A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be provided with a Reddit post and two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more preferred by humans based on the following criteria: Relevance to the Post, Clarity and Coherence, Depth and Thoughtfulness, Positive Tone and Respectful Language, Correctness and Accuracy, Natural Language and Tone, Conciseness\n\nGiven the information above, please select either A or B:\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How can the same side of the moon always face earth? Doesn't it rotate? The fact that the Chinese just landed on the dark side makes it seem stranger.\n\nA: You can sorta imagine that the moon is swung around on a large, invisible rope that's connected to the side facing us. It no longer rotates at a rate faster than it orbits around us. We call this being \"tidal locking\". It actually happens not all too uncommonly in space. Pluto and one of its moons are both tidally locked to each other where Pluto actually rotates about a point that isn't its own axis, always facing that moon with the same side in the process. Again, using the swinging rope analogy, imagine that you're swinging something so heavy that you actually lean back to prevent yourself from falling over while swinging it. That's basically what Pluto is doing.\n\nB: The Moon rotates just like most other objects in space. However, the time it takes to rotate is exactly the same as it takes to go around the Earth. From our perspective, the same side is always facing us. The process by which this is maintained is called Tidal Locking.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be a given Reddit post and two comments for the Reddit post from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which of the comments is more preferred by human given the following criteria.\n\nYou need to consider following criteria\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nGiven above information, please answer which of the comment is more preferred by human, A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How can the same side of the moon always face earth? Doesn't it rotate? The fact that the Chinese just landed on the dark side makes it seem stranger.\n\nA: This illustration from Wikipedia was a breakthrough for me: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/56/Tidal\\_locking\\_of\\_the\\_Moon\\_with\\_the\\_Earth.gif ​\n\nB: This video explains it very nicely.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be a given Reddit post and two comments for the Reddit post from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which of the comments is more preferred by human given the following criteria.\n\nYou need to consider following criteria\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nGiven above information, please answer which of the comment is more preferred by human, A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How can the same side of the moon always face earth? Doesn't it rotate? The fact that the Chinese just landed on the dark side makes it seem stranger.\n\nA: This illustration from Wikipedia was a breakthrough for me: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/56/Tidal\\_locking\\_of\\_the\\_Moon\\_with\\_the\\_Earth.gif ​\n\nB: Imagine you're holding both hands in a room with a friend dancing and spinning around each other. If someone else is in the room (as the sun), each of you will appear to be spinning but you two are always facing each other as you are turning at the same rate.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will receive a Reddit post along with two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more favored by humans based on the following criteria:\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nAfter considering the given information, please indicate which comment is preferred: A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How can the same side of the moon always face earth? Doesn't it rotate? The fact that the Chinese just landed on the dark side makes it seem stranger.\n\nA: It does so because it rotates. Specifically one rotation of its axis is equal to one orbit around earth. Thus the same side always faces earth as it is turning toward earth as it orbits.\n\nB: This illustration from Wikipedia was a breakthrough for me: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/56/Tidal\\_locking\\_of\\_the\\_Moon\\_with\\_the\\_Earth.gif ​\n\nPlease respond with either A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will receive a Reddit post along with two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more favored by humans based on the following criteria:\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nAfter considering the given information, please indicate which comment is preferred: A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How can the same side of the moon always face earth? Doesn't it rotate? The fact that the Chinese just landed on the dark side makes it seem stranger.\n\nA: This illustration from Wikipedia was a breakthrough for me: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/56/Tidal\\_locking\\_of\\_the\\_Moon\\_with\\_the\\_Earth.gif ​\n\nB: Do this: Stand face-to-face with a friend. Walk around them in a circle, but make sure you keep facing the same direction. You've just revolved around them without rotating, or orbited without spinning. Now, do the same thing again, but keep facing your friend as you go around them. You've just revolved AND rotated. In other words, you orbited while spinning. This is how the moon orbits the Earth. The real thing is a little more complicated, because the Earth revolves at a different rate than the moon does (which is why the moon goes through phases,) but the important thing for your question is that the moon rotates at the same rate it revolves around the Earth due to being tidally locked, which others have described better than I could.\n\nPlease respond with either A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be provided with a Reddit post and two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more preferred by humans based on the following criteria: Relevance to the Post, Clarity and Coherence, Depth and Thoughtfulness, Positive Tone and Respectful Language, Correctness and Accuracy, Natural Language and Tone, Conciseness\n\nGiven the information above, please select either A or B:\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How can the same side of the moon always face earth? Doesn't it rotate? The fact that the Chinese just landed on the dark side makes it seem stranger.\n\nA: This illustration from Wikipedia was a breakthrough for me: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/56/Tidal\\_locking\\_of\\_the\\_Moon\\_with\\_the\\_Earth.gif ​\n\nB: Like someone else said, this is because the moon is \"tidally locked.\" This just means that, because the closest part of the moon (the side facing us) experiences more gravity than the far side (because gravity gets weaker with distance), this difference (called a gradient) makes the moon bulge in one direction like a tennis ball being squished. The bulges like to be lined up with earth, because it puts more of the moon closer to earth (lower potential energy). If you were to turn the moon to one side, you'd be lifting up one of the bulges further from the earth which would take extra energy. Now you might be saying \"but this also lowers the bulge on the other side closer to earth! This should balance out!\" You're right, but since the bulge on the other side is further from earth, there's less force from gravity on it, which means there's more force trying to keep the bulges aligned with earth (and one side facing earth) than there is trying to turn them away.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be provided with a Reddit post and two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more preferred by humans based on the following criteria: Relevance to the Post, Clarity and Coherence, Depth and Thoughtfulness, Positive Tone and Respectful Language, Correctness and Accuracy, Natural Language and Tone, Conciseness\n\nGiven the information above, please select either A or B:\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How can the same side of the moon always face earth? Doesn't it rotate? The fact that the Chinese just landed on the dark side makes it seem stranger.\n\nA: Wow a lot of explanations suck. Ill try. Its tidally locked. It does rotate. Sit in a chair. Stick your foot out. That's the sun. Make a fist and hold it somewhere between your head and your foot. Thats the earth. Take your other hand, leave it open with your palm facing your the fist. Thats the moon. Make big/wide circular orbits around the fist keeping your palm facing the fist at all times. You will see that you need to rotate your open hand in order to have your palm facing your fist. Thats a tidal lock. You can also see that your foot has a line of sight (sunshine) to any part of your open hand at some point during each orbit. Thats the moons day night cycle. You may notice that one full rotation of your open hand occurs every time you complete one full orbit. Thats how long a rotation the moon takes, because its tidally locked. Result is the same as the moon. One side always faces the earth. The moon has day and night cycles, they're just really really long (the time it takes to orbit the earth, about 27 days IIRC) Edit: Thank you for the gold! I'm glad people liked the explanation.\n\nB: This illustration from Wikipedia was a breakthrough for me: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/56/Tidal\\_locking\\_of\\_the\\_Moon\\_with\\_the\\_Earth.gif ​\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be provided with a Reddit post and two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more preferred by humans based on the following criteria: Relevance to the Post, Clarity and Coherence, Depth and Thoughtfulness, Positive Tone and Respectful Language, Correctness and Accuracy, Natural Language and Tone, Conciseness\n\nGiven the information above, please select either A or B:\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How can the same side of the moon always face earth? Doesn't it rotate? The fact that the Chinese just landed on the dark side makes it seem stranger.\n\nA: This illustration from Wikipedia was a breakthrough for me: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/56/Tidal\\_locking\\_of\\_the\\_Moon\\_with\\_the\\_Earth.gif ​\n\nB: Imagine putting an egg in a bucket of water, one side would always float upwards because it's unevenly shaped, right? Well, that's true even if you were to pick the bucket up and swing it around you in circles, except now the top of the egg is always facing *inward*, instead of just always facing up. The Moon is like that egg, in that one side of it is heavier than the other. And just like the egg floating free in the swinging bucket, the heavy side is always going to face inward.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will receive a Reddit post along with two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more favored by humans based on the following criteria:\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nAfter considering the given information, please indicate which comment is preferred: A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How can the same side of the moon always face earth? Doesn't it rotate? The fact that the Chinese just landed on the dark side makes it seem stranger.\n\nA: This illustration from Wikipedia was a breakthrough for me: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/56/Tidal\\_locking\\_of\\_the\\_Moon\\_with\\_the\\_Earth.gif ​\n\nB: The moon is tidal locked, and egg shaped. It doesn't freely rotate, because gravity pulls its heavy side always towards earth. I am reading a lot of \"the moon rotates, but perfectly aligned with the earth so we only see one side\" comments, which is false. Any \"rotation\" the moon makes, is because it's heavy side (the side we see) is always pulled towards earth, and that's about it. Tl;Dr The moon has a heavy side and that is always pulled towards earth's gravity. No rotation in the conventional ways we know.\n\nPlease respond with either A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be provided with a Reddit post and two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more preferred by humans based on the following criteria: Relevance to the Post, Clarity and Coherence, Depth and Thoughtfulness, Positive Tone and Respectful Language, Correctness and Accuracy, Natural Language and Tone, Conciseness\n\nGiven the information above, please select either A or B:\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How can the same side of the moon always face earth? Doesn't it rotate? The fact that the Chinese just landed on the dark side makes it seem stranger.\n\nA: So other comments have explained it pretty well, but for the sake of a simplified less correct version that's easier to understand. Just know that from the reference point of the sun, the moon is rotating and takes 28 days to spin all the way around, and it's also moving around the earth at a rate of one lap per 28 days, so it just happens^^^* to always be facing the earth. \\* not a coincidence\n\nB: This illustration from Wikipedia was a breakthrough for me: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/56/Tidal\\_locking\\_of\\_the\\_Moon\\_with\\_the\\_Earth.gif ​\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be a given Reddit post and two comments for the Reddit post from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which of the comments is more preferred by human given the following criteria.\n\nYou need to consider following criteria\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nGiven above information, please answer which of the comment is more preferred by human, A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How can the same side of the moon always face earth? Doesn't it rotate? The fact that the Chinese just landed on the dark side makes it seem stranger.\n\nA: This illustration from Wikipedia was a breakthrough for me: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/56/Tidal\\_locking\\_of\\_the\\_Moon\\_with\\_the\\_Earth.gif ​\n\nB: Most people have answered this question with tidal locking, but the reason this happens to our moon is just as interesting in my opinion: Over time gravity has stretched the moon out into a slight egg shape, just enough that the earths gravity will pull hard enough on the side nearest to it so that if the moon’s rotation ever gets out of phase with the earth, the force of gravity on this front side will pull it back into place. The moon is essentially always doing small oscillations based on where this front side of the egg is in relation to the earth.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be provided with a Reddit post and two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more preferred by humans based on the following criteria: Relevance to the Post, Clarity and Coherence, Depth and Thoughtfulness, Positive Tone and Respectful Language, Correctness and Accuracy, Natural Language and Tone, Conciseness\n\nGiven the information above, please select either A or B:\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How can the same side of the moon always face earth? Doesn't it rotate? The fact that the Chinese just landed on the dark side makes it seem stranger.\n\nA: This illustration from Wikipedia was a breakthrough for me: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/56/Tidal\\_locking\\_of\\_the\\_Moon\\_with\\_the\\_Earth.gif ​\n\nB: The moon does one rotation every month, therefore it's synced up to always have the same side facing the Earth. This is actually the norm for most moons and small bodies in the solar system. The term \"dark side\" is a misnomer, it experiences a day/night cycle every month like the rest of the surface of the Moon, but it's known as the dark side because it's always obscured to us. Operating there is difficult because you lose line-of-sight communications, so you need some sort of relay satellite if you want to send a machine there. All the Apollo missions and most robotic lunar landing missions have landed on the near-side of the Moon. That's why this Chinese landing is especially exciting, they will explore the far side in more detail than has been achieved before.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will receive a Reddit post along with two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more favored by humans based on the following criteria:\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nAfter considering the given information, please indicate which comment is preferred: A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How can the same side of the moon always face earth? Doesn't it rotate? The fact that the Chinese just landed on the dark side makes it seem stranger.\n\nA: So imagine you stood in your garden with a hula hoop around you. And you friend was helping to make it look like you can hula hoop by pulling on the hula hoop so that it is constantly tight to your waist, and they are side stepping around you in a large circle so the hula hoop fully circles around you like it does when hula hooping. Your friend would be constantly facing you while they hold on to the hoop. That friend would be like the moon and you'd be like the earth. They would travel the perimeter of a full circle around you with you at the center at the same time as they would complete a full 360 degree spin themselves (as in they would start of facing North, then East, South, West and back to North). One of there spins around you would take about a month. In the meantime you can independently spin on the spot on much faster (1 day) than he is side stepping around you. You would only ever see his face when you look at him but he would be able to see your front, side and back.\n\nB: This illustration from Wikipedia was a breakthrough for me: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/56/Tidal\\_locking\\_of\\_the\\_Moon\\_with\\_the\\_Earth.gif ​\n\nPlease respond with either A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will receive a Reddit post along with two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more favored by humans based on the following criteria:\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nAfter considering the given information, please indicate which comment is preferred: A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How can the same side of the moon always face earth? Doesn't it rotate? The fact that the Chinese just landed on the dark side makes it seem stranger.\n\nA: It’s because the moon rotates once every 28 days and makes one trip around the earth once every 28 days. So it is rotating but we only see the one side of it. At least that’s what my earth science teacher taught me.\n\nB: This illustration from Wikipedia was a breakthrough for me: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/56/Tidal\\_locking\\_of\\_the\\_Moon\\_with\\_the\\_Earth.gif ​\n\nPlease respond with either A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be provided with a Reddit post and two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more preferred by humans based on the following criteria: Relevance to the Post, Clarity and Coherence, Depth and Thoughtfulness, Positive Tone and Respectful Language, Correctness and Accuracy, Natural Language and Tone, Conciseness\n\nGiven the information above, please select either A or B:\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How can the same side of the moon always face earth? Doesn't it rotate? The fact that the Chinese just landed on the dark side makes it seem stranger.\n\nA: This illustration from Wikipedia was a breakthrough for me: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/56/Tidal\\_locking\\_of\\_the\\_Moon\\_with\\_the\\_Earth.gif ​\n\nB: You can sorta imagine that the moon is swung around on a large, invisible rope that's connected to the side facing us. It no longer rotates at a rate faster than it orbits around us. We call this being \"tidal locking\". It actually happens not all too uncommonly in space. Pluto and one of its moons are both tidally locked to each other where Pluto actually rotates about a point that isn't its own axis, always facing that moon with the same side in the process. Again, using the swinging rope analogy, imagine that you're swinging something so heavy that you actually lean back to prevent yourself from falling over while swinging it. That's basically what Pluto is doing.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be a given Reddit post and two comments for the Reddit post from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which of the comments is more preferred by human given the following criteria.\n\nYou need to consider following criteria\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nGiven above information, please answer which of the comment is more preferred by human, A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How can the same side of the moon always face earth? Doesn't it rotate? The fact that the Chinese just landed on the dark side makes it seem stranger.\n\nA: It does so because it rotates. Specifically one rotation of its axis is equal to one orbit around earth. Thus the same side always faces earth as it is turning toward earth as it orbits.\n\nB: This video explains it very nicely.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will receive a Reddit post along with two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more favored by humans based on the following criteria:\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nAfter considering the given information, please indicate which comment is preferred: A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How can the same side of the moon always face earth? Doesn't it rotate? The fact that the Chinese just landed on the dark side makes it seem stranger.\n\nA: Do this: Stand face-to-face with a friend. Walk around them in a circle, but make sure you keep facing the same direction. You've just revolved around them without rotating, or orbited without spinning. Now, do the same thing again, but keep facing your friend as you go around them. You've just revolved AND rotated. In other words, you orbited while spinning. This is how the moon orbits the Earth. The real thing is a little more complicated, because the Earth revolves at a different rate than the moon does (which is why the moon goes through phases,) but the important thing for your question is that the moon rotates at the same rate it revolves around the Earth due to being tidally locked, which others have described better than I could.\n\nB: This video explains it very nicely.\n\nPlease respond with either A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be provided with a Reddit post and two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more preferred by humans based on the following criteria: Relevance to the Post, Clarity and Coherence, Depth and Thoughtfulness, Positive Tone and Respectful Language, Correctness and Accuracy, Natural Language and Tone, Conciseness\n\nGiven the information above, please select either A or B:\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How can the same side of the moon always face earth? Doesn't it rotate? The fact that the Chinese just landed on the dark side makes it seem stranger.\n\nA: Like someone else said, this is because the moon is \"tidally locked.\" This just means that, because the closest part of the moon (the side facing us) experiences more gravity than the far side (because gravity gets weaker with distance), this difference (called a gradient) makes the moon bulge in one direction like a tennis ball being squished. The bulges like to be lined up with earth, because it puts more of the moon closer to earth (lower potential energy). If you were to turn the moon to one side, you'd be lifting up one of the bulges further from the earth which would take extra energy. Now you might be saying \"but this also lowers the bulge on the other side closer to earth! This should balance out!\" You're right, but since the bulge on the other side is further from earth, there's less force from gravity on it, which means there's more force trying to keep the bulges aligned with earth (and one side facing earth) than there is trying to turn them away.\n\nB: This video explains it very nicely.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be a given Reddit post and two comments for the Reddit post from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which of the comments is more preferred by human given the following criteria.\n\nYou need to consider following criteria\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nGiven above information, please answer which of the comment is more preferred by human, A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How can the same side of the moon always face earth? Doesn't it rotate? The fact that the Chinese just landed on the dark side makes it seem stranger.\n\nA: Most people have answered this question with tidal locking, but the reason this happens to our moon is just as interesting in my opinion: Over time gravity has stretched the moon out into a slight egg shape, just enough that the earths gravity will pull hard enough on the side nearest to it so that if the moon’s rotation ever gets out of phase with the earth, the force of gravity on this front side will pull it back into place. The moon is essentially always doing small oscillations based on where this front side of the egg is in relation to the earth.\n\nB: This video explains it very nicely.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be provided with a Reddit post and two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more preferred by humans based on the following criteria: Relevance to the Post, Clarity and Coherence, Depth and Thoughtfulness, Positive Tone and Respectful Language, Correctness and Accuracy, Natural Language and Tone, Conciseness\n\nGiven the information above, please select either A or B:\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How can the same side of the moon always face earth? Doesn't it rotate? The fact that the Chinese just landed on the dark side makes it seem stranger.\n\nA: This video explains it very nicely.\n\nB: The moon does one rotation every month, therefore it's synced up to always have the same side facing the Earth. This is actually the norm for most moons and small bodies in the solar system. The term \"dark side\" is a misnomer, it experiences a day/night cycle every month like the rest of the surface of the Moon, but it's known as the dark side because it's always obscured to us. Operating there is difficult because you lose line-of-sight communications, so you need some sort of relay satellite if you want to send a machine there. All the Apollo missions and most robotic lunar landing missions have landed on the near-side of the Moon. That's why this Chinese landing is especially exciting, they will explore the far side in more detail than has been achieved before.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will receive a Reddit post along with two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more favored by humans based on the following criteria:\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nAfter considering the given information, please indicate which comment is preferred: A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How can the same side of the moon always face earth? Doesn't it rotate? The fact that the Chinese just landed on the dark side makes it seem stranger.\n\nA: So imagine you stood in your garden with a hula hoop around you. And you friend was helping to make it look like you can hula hoop by pulling on the hula hoop so that it is constantly tight to your waist, and they are side stepping around you in a large circle so the hula hoop fully circles around you like it does when hula hooping. Your friend would be constantly facing you while they hold on to the hoop. That friend would be like the moon and you'd be like the earth. They would travel the perimeter of a full circle around you with you at the center at the same time as they would complete a full 360 degree spin themselves (as in they would start of facing North, then East, South, West and back to North). One of there spins around you would take about a month. In the meantime you can independently spin on the spot on much faster (1 day) than he is side stepping around you. You would only ever see his face when you look at him but he would be able to see your front, side and back.\n\nB: This video explains it very nicely.\n\nPlease respond with either A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will receive a Reddit post along with two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more favored by humans based on the following criteria:\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nAfter considering the given information, please indicate which comment is preferred: A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How can the same side of the moon always face earth? Doesn't it rotate? The fact that the Chinese just landed on the dark side makes it seem stranger.\n\nA: You can sorta imagine that the moon is swung around on a large, invisible rope that's connected to the side facing us. It no longer rotates at a rate faster than it orbits around us. We call this being \"tidal locking\". It actually happens not all too uncommonly in space. Pluto and one of its moons are both tidally locked to each other where Pluto actually rotates about a point that isn't its own axis, always facing that moon with the same side in the process. Again, using the swinging rope analogy, imagine that you're swinging something so heavy that you actually lean back to prevent yourself from falling over while swinging it. That's basically what Pluto is doing.\n\nB: This video explains it very nicely.\n\nPlease respond with either A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will be provided with a Reddit post and two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more preferred by humans based on the following criteria: Relevance to the Post, Clarity and Coherence, Depth and Thoughtfulness, Positive Tone and Respectful Language, Correctness and Accuracy, Natural Language and Tone, Conciseness\n\nGiven the information above, please select either A or B:\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How can the same side of the moon always face earth? Doesn't it rotate? The fact that the Chinese just landed on the dark side makes it seem stranger.\n\nA: Imagine you're holding both hands in a room with a friend dancing and spinning around each other. If someone else is in the room (as the sun), each of you will appear to be spinning but you two are always facing each other as you are turning at the same rate.\n\nB: It does so because it rotates. Specifically one rotation of its axis is equal to one orbit around earth. Thus the same side always faces earth as it is turning toward earth as it orbits.\n\nPlease respond with only A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "You will receive a Reddit post along with two comments from the subreddit explainlikeimfive. Your task is to determine which comment is more favored by humans based on the following criteria:\n\n Relevance to the Post\n Clarity and Coherence\n Depth and Thoughtfulness\n Positive Tone and Respectful Language\n Correctness and Accuracy\n Natural Language and Tone\n Conciseness\n\nAfter considering the given information, please indicate which comment is preferred: A or B?\nReddit post: Explain like I'm five years old: How can the same side of the moon always face earth? Doesn't it rotate? The fact that the Chinese just landed on the dark side makes it seem stranger.\n\nA: Do this: Stand face-to-face with a friend. Walk around them in a circle, but make sure you keep facing the same direction. You've just revolved around them without rotating, or orbited without spinning. Now, do the same thing again, but keep facing your friend as you go around them. You've just revolved AND rotated. In other words, you orbited while spinning. This is how the moon orbits the Earth. The real thing is a little more complicated, because the Earth revolves at a different rate than the moon does (which is why the moon goes through phases,) but the important thing for your question is that the moon rotates at the same rate it revolves around the Earth due to being tidally locked, which others have described better than I could.\n\nB: Imagine you're holding both hands in a room with a friend dancing and spinning around each other. If someone else is in the room (as the sun), each of you will appear to be spinning but you two are always facing each other as you are turning at the same rate.\n\nPlease respond with either A or B.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]