Datasets:

chriswilde006

/

llama-case

like 0

<s>[INST] Case ID: 23456/2024 [/INST] Case Name: Vikas Jain vs. State of Gujarat </s><s>[INST] Date: 15-03-2024 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: D.Y. Chandrachud, Hemant Gupta [/INST] Legal Principles: Environmental law, pollution control, regulatory compliance </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged industrial pollution in his locality. [/INST] Judgment Text: The court ordered stringent regulatory compliance and pollution control measures. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 929/2022 [/INST] Case Name: Jammu and Kashmir Bank vs. State of Maharashtra </s><s>[INST] Date: 10-08-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: N.V. Ramana, Krishna Murari [/INST] Legal Principles: Banking regulations and compliance. Risk assessment norms and penalties. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with risk assessment norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance. [/INST] Judgment Text: The penalties were upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 1123/2022 [/INST] Case Name: National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Rajinder Kaur </s><s>[INST] Date: 20-01-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, S. Ravindra Bhat [/INST] Legal Principles: Insurance claims and policy interpretation. Good faith in insurance contracts. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The insurer challenged the claim settlement under a motor vehicle insurance policy. The Supreme Court upheld the claim, stating the insurer failed to prove breach of good faith by the claimant. [/INST] Judgment Text: The claim was upheld, and the insurer was directed to pay the settlement. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 921/2022 [/INST] Case Name: State of Punjab vs. JKL Industries </s><s>[INST] Date: 05-04-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: M.R. Shah, Aniruddha Bose [/INST] Legal Principles: Industrial safety and state regulations. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The case involved a dispute over safety regulations. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the state. [/INST] Judgment Text: Safety regulations were upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 946/2022 [/INST] Case Name: JKL Corporation vs. Union of India </s><s>[INST] Date: 10-08-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: N.V. Ramana, Surya Kant [/INST] Legal Principles: Industrial safety standards and compliance </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner contested the stringent safety standards imposed by the government. [/INST] Judgment Text: The standards were upheld, with a timeline extension for compliance. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 915/2022 [/INST] Case Name: State of Gujarat vs. XYZ Ltd. </s><s>[INST] Date: 05-03-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: A.M. Khanwilkar, B.R. Gavai [/INST] Legal Principles: Environmental law and corporate responsibility. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The case involved a dispute over environmental pollution. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the state. [/INST] Judgment Text: The corporation was held responsible. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 919/2022 [/INST] Case Name: Federal Bank vs. State of Assam </s><s>[INST] Date: 20-10-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: S.A. Bobde, A.S. Bopanna [/INST] Legal Principles: Banking regulations and compliance. Liquidity management norms and penalties. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with liquidity management norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance. [/INST] Judgment Text: The penalties were upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 567/2019 [/INST] Case Name: Bharti Airtel vs. State of Uttar Pradesh </s><s>[INST] Date: 15-05-2019 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: Ranjan Gogoi, Deepak Gupta [/INST] Legal Principles: Telecom regulations and compliance. License fees and penalties. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged penalties for late payment of license fees. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing timely compliance with regulatory requirements. [/INST] Judgment Text: The penalties were upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 926/2022 [/INST] Case Name: Bandhan Bank vs. State of Nagaland </s><s>[INST] Date: 25-05-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan [/INST] Legal Principles: Banking regulations and compliance. Financial reporting norms and penalties. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with financial reporting norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance. [/INST] Judgment Text: The penalties were upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 567/2021 [/INST] Case Name: DLF Ltd. vs. Union of India </s><s>[INST] Date: 13-07-2021 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash Reddy [/INST] Legal Principles: Real estate regulations and compliance. Consumer protection in real estate transactions. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged penalties imposed for non-compliance with real estate regulations. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, reinforcing consumer protection in real estate transactions. [/INST] Judgment Text: The penalties were upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 34567/2025 [/INST] Case Name: Nikhil Kumar vs. State of Andhra Pradesh </s><s>[INST] Date: 18-04-2025 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: R.F. Nariman, B.R. Gavai [/INST] Legal Principles: Administrative law, service matter, seniority </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged his seniority in the service cadre. [/INST] Judgment Text: The court ordered a review of the seniority list. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 01234/2026 [/INST] Case Name: Amit Desai vs. State of Madhya Pradesh </s><s>[INST] Date: 22-01-2026 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: A.M. Khanwilkar, Indu Malhotra [/INST] Legal Principles: Environmental law, deforestation, restoration </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged illegal deforestation activities. [/INST] Judgment Text: The court ordered restoration of the deforested area and penal action against violators. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 123/2018 [/INST] Case Name: Neha Sharma vs. Indian Railways </s><s>[INST] Date: 15-09-2018 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan [/INST] Legal Principles: Compensation for accidents, liability of Indian Railways. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner sought compensation for injuries sustained in a train accident. [/INST] Judgment Text: The court ordered Indian Railways to pay compensation to the petitioner. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 345/2018 [/INST] Case Name: Meena Devi vs. State of Uttar Pradesh </s><s>[INST] Date: 19-12-2018 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan [/INST] Legal Principles: Compensation under land acquisition laws. Fair market value assessment. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged the compensation awarded under the Land Acquisition Act, claiming it was below market value. The Supreme Court directed a reassessment of the compensation based on current market value. [/INST] Judgment Text: The compensation was ordered to be reassessed. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 945/2022 [/INST] Case Name: State of Tamil Nadu vs. QRS Enterprises </s><s>[INST] Date: 05-08-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: R.F. Nariman, Navin Sinha [/INST] Legal Principles: Environmental law and corporate responsibility </s><s>[INST] Summary: The state sued the corporation for environmental damages caused by its operations. [/INST] Judgment Text: The corporation was fined and required to implement remediation measures. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 928/2022 [/INST] Case Name: PQR Corporation vs. State of Odisha </s><s>[INST] Date: 10-05-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: A.M. Khanwilkar, C.T. Ravikumar [/INST] Legal Principles: Environmental regulations and corporate compliance. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged environmental compliance costs. The Supreme Court upheld the costs. [/INST] Judgment Text: Compliance costs were upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 911/2022 [/INST] Case Name: Bank of India vs. State of Chhattisgarh </s><s>[INST] Date: 10-02-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: R.F. Nariman, Navin Sinha [/INST] Legal Principles: Banking regulations and compliance. Loan recovery norms and penalties. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with loan recovery norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance. [/INST] Judgment Text: The penalties were upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 913/2022 [/INST] Case Name: Indian Bank vs. State of Tamil Nadu </s><s>[INST] Date: 20-04-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: N.V. Ramana, Krishna Murari [/INST] Legal Principles: Banking regulations and compliance. Microfinance norms and penalties. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with microfinance norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance. [/INST] Judgment Text: The penalties were upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 342/2023 [/INST] Case Name: Amazon India vs. Future Retail Ltd. </s><s>[INST] Date: 25-05-2023 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: N.V. Ramana, Krishna Murari [/INST] Legal Principles: Corporate disputes and arbitration. Enforcement of arbitration awards. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner sought enforcement of an arbitration award against Future Retail. The Supreme Court upheld the award, emphasizing the enforceability of arbitration decisions in corporate disputes. [/INST] Judgment Text: The arbitration award was upheld, and enforcement was directed. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 898/2021 [/INST] Case Name: Bharat Petroleum Corp. Ltd. vs. State of Tamil Nadu </s><s>[INST] Date: 15-09-2021 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash Reddy [/INST] Legal Principles: Regulatory compliance in the petroleum sector. State vs. central regulatory authority. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The company challenged state regulatory orders affecting its operations. The Supreme Court upheld the state orders, emphasizing the state's regulatory authority in specific circumstances. [/INST] Judgment Text: The state orders were upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 925/2022 [/INST] Case Name: GHI Bank vs. State of Andhra Pradesh </s><s>[INST] Date: 25-04-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, Sanjiv Khanna [/INST] Legal Principles: Banking regulations and state oversight. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged state oversight measures. The Supreme Court upheld the measures. [/INST] Judgment Text: Oversight measures were upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 456/2020 [/INST] Case Name: Federal Bank vs. State of Kerala </s><s>[INST] Date: 23-03-2020 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: S.A. Nazeer, Hemant Gupta [/INST] Legal Principles: Banking regulations and compliance. AML norms and penalties. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with AML norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, reinforcing regulatory compliance in banking operations. [/INST] Judgment Text: The penalties were upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 01234/2024 [/INST] Case Name: Manoj Kumar vs. State of Bihar </s><s>[INST] Date: 18-01-2024 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: Ranjan Gogoi, Deepak Gupta [/INST] Legal Principles: Criminal law, bail, anticipatory bail </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner sought anticipatory bail in a fraud case. [/INST] Judgment Text: The court granted anticipatory bail with conditions. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 90123/2023 [/INST] Case Name: Sanjay Aggarwal vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi </s><s>[INST] Date: 15-11-2023 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: A.K. Sikri, S. Abdul Nazeer [/INST] Legal Principles: Municipal law, unauthorized construction, demolition </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged the demolition of his property by the MCD. [/INST] Judgment Text: The court ordered a stay on demolition and called for a review of the authorization. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 931/2022 [/INST] Case Name: Shamrao Vithal Co-operative Bank vs. State of Maharashtra </s><s>[INST] Date: 20-10-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan [/INST] Legal Principles: Banking regulations and compliance. Cooperative banking norms and penalties. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with cooperative banking norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance. [/INST] Judgment Text: The penalties were upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 5678/2019 [/INST] Case Name: Alok Sharma vs. Ministry of Environment </s><s>[INST] Date: 14-08-2019 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: S.A. Bobde, L. Nageswara Rao [/INST] Legal Principles: Environmental law, pollution control, interpretation of environmental regulations. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged the environmental clearance granted for a construction project. [/INST] Judgment Text: The court stayed the clearance, ordering a review of the environmental impact assessment. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 916/2022 [/INST] Case Name: IndusInd Bank vs. State of Andhra Pradesh </s><s>[INST] Date: 05-07-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: R.F. Nariman, Navin Sinha [/INST] Legal Principles: Banking regulations and compliance. Capital adequacy norms and penalties. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with capital adequacy norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance. [/INST] Judgment Text: The penalties were upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 876/2020 [/INST] Case Name: TCS vs. State of Tamil Nadu </s><s>[INST] Date: 13-07-2020 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: A.M. Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari [/INST] Legal Principles: Corporate tax disputes. Tax incentives and exemptions. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged the withdrawal of tax incentives granted by the state. The Supreme Court upheld the withdrawal, emphasizing the state's authority in granting and withdrawing tax incentives. [/INST] Judgment Text: The withdrawal of tax incentives was upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 903/2022 [/INST] Case Name: ICICI Bank vs. State of Gujarat </s><s>[INST] Date: 20-06-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: N.V. Ramana, Krishna Murari [/INST] Legal Principles: Banking regulations and compliance. Loan disbursement norms and penalties. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with loan disbursement norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance. [/INST] Judgment Text: The penalties were upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 90123/2024 [/INST] Case Name: Sunita Agarwal vs. State of Assam </s><s>[INST] Date: 12-10-2024 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: U.U. Lalit, Vineet Saran [/INST] Legal Principles: Public interest litigation, environmental protection, industrial pollution </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner filed a PIL for environmental protection against industrial pollution. [/INST] Judgment Text: The court ordered stringent pollution control measures and regular monitoring. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 906/2022 [/INST] Case Name: Canara Bank vs. State of Karnataka </s><s>[INST] Date: 10-09-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: S.A. Bobde, A.S. Bopanna [/INST] Legal Principles: Banking regulations and compliance. Credit card issuance norms and penalties. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with credit card issuance norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance. [/INST] Judgment Text: The penalties were upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 954/2022 [/INST] Case Name: State of Gujarat vs. OPQ Ltd. </s><s>[INST] Date: 20-09-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: A.S. Bopanna, Hrishikesh Roy [/INST] Legal Principles: Environmental law and corporate responsibility </s><s>[INST] Summary: The state sued the company for environmental violations. [/INST] Judgment Text: The company was fined and required to implement corrective measures. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 231/2019 [/INST] Case Name: Sahara India vs. SEBI </s><s>[INST] Date: 25-03-2019 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan [/INST] Legal Principles: Securities regulations and compliance. Investor protection in financial markets. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged SEBI's order directing repayment to investors. The Supreme Court upheld SEBI's order, emphasizing the importance of investor protection and regulatory compliance. [/INST] Judgment Text: The repayment order was upheld, and the company was directed to comply. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 890/2020 [/INST] Case Name: IDFC First Bank vs. State of Karnataka </s><s>[INST] Date: 28-05-2020 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: A.M. Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari [/INST] Legal Principles: Banking regulations and compliance. Customer data protection and penalties. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with customer data protection norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance. [/INST] Judgment Text: The penalties were upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 345/2022 [/INST] Case Name: Hindustan Unilever Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra </s><s>[INST] Date: 05-05-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: D.Y. Chandrachud, A.S. Bopanna [/INST] Legal Principles: Consumer protection laws and corporate liability. Misleading advertisements and penalties. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The company challenged penalties for misleading advertisements. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing the importance of truthful advertising. [/INST] Judgment Text: The penalties were upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 930/2022 [/INST] Case Name: STU Industries vs. State of Assam </s><s>[INST] Date: 20-05-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: N.V. Ramana, Surya Kant [/INST] Legal Principles: Corporate taxes and state audits. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged a state audit report. The Supreme Court upheld the audit report. [/INST] Judgment Text: Audit report was upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 123/2021 [/INST] Case Name: SpiceJet Ltd. vs. State of Karnataka </s><s>[INST] Date: 14-02-2021 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: Ashok Bhushan, M.R. Shah [/INST] Legal Principles: Aviation regulations and compliance. State vs. central regulatory authority. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged state regulatory orders affecting its operations. The Supreme Court upheld the central authority's jurisdiction, emphasizing the central government's role in aviation regulation. [/INST] Judgment Text: The state orders were set aside in favor of central regulation. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 789/2018 [/INST] Case Name: Reliance Communications vs. State of Maharashtra </s><s>[INST] Date: 27-06-2018 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: A.K. Sikri, S. Abdul Nazeer [/INST] Legal Principles: Telecom regulations and compliance. Spectrum allocation and penalties. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with telecom regulations. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, stressing the importance of regulatory compliance in spectrum allocation. [/INST] Judgment Text: The penalties were upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 90123/2025 [/INST] Case Name: Vandana Kumari vs. State of Haryana </s><s>[INST] Date: 12-10-2025 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: N.V. Ramana, S.A. Bobde [/INST] Legal Principles: Property law, ancestral property, partition </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner sought partition of ancestral property. [/INST] Judgment Text: The court ordered partition as per legal heirs' entitlement. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 654/2021 [/INST] Case Name: Vedanta Ltd. vs. State of Odisha </s><s>[INST] Date: 11-11-2021 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: N.V. Ramana, Surya Kant [/INST] Legal Principles: Mining regulations and environmental compliance. Corporate responsibility in resource extraction. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged environmental penalties imposed for mining activities. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing corporate responsibility in resource extraction. [/INST] Judgment Text: The penalties were upheld, and the company was directed to ensure compliance. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 890/2021 [/INST] Case Name: Jio Payments Bank vs. State of Madhya Pradesh </s><s>[INST] Date: 01-12-2021 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: D.Y. Chandrachud, Surya Kant [/INST] Legal Principles: Banking regulations and compliance. Digital banking norms and penalties. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with digital banking norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance. [/INST] Judgment Text: The penalties were upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 1256/2019 [/INST] Case Name: Rajesh Kumar vs. Union of India </s><s>[INST] Date: 15-04-2019 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: Ranjan Gogoi, Deepak Gupta [/INST] Legal Principles: Challenge to the constitutional validity of a statute. Retrospective application of laws. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged the retrospective application of a tax amendment. The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the retrospective law, emphasizing the legislative intent and public interest. [/INST] Judgment Text: The court dismissed the petition, stating that retrospective application was justified. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 78901/2024 [/INST] Case Name: Suresh Gupta vs. State of Haryana </s><s>[INST] Date: 15-08-2024 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: A.K. Sikri, S. Abdul Nazeer [/INST] Legal Principles: Consumer protection, defective goods, compensation </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner sought compensation for defective goods purchased. [/INST] Judgment Text: The court awarded compensation to the petitioner. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 789/2022 [/INST] Case Name: Wipro Ltd. vs. State of Karnataka </s><s>[INST] Date: 29-10-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: S.A. Bobde, B.R. Gavai [/INST] Legal Principles: Corporate tax disputes. Interpretation of tax statutes. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged an additional corporate tax imposed by the state. The Supreme Court upheld the tax, interpreting the statutory provisions in favor of the state government. [/INST] Judgment Text: The additional corporate tax was upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 56789/2024 [/INST] Case Name: Rekha Sharma vs. State of Uttar Pradesh </s><s>[INST] Date: 25-06-2024 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: R.F. Nariman, B.R. Gavai [/INST] Legal Principles: Civil procedure, limitation period, condonation of delay </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner sought condonation of delay in filing a suit. [/INST] Judgment Text: The court condoned the delay and allowed the suit to proceed. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 924/2022 [/INST] Case Name: DEF Ltd. vs. State of Kerala </s><s>[INST] Date: 20-04-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: S.K. Kaul, M.M. Sundresh [/INST] Legal Principles: Corporate liability and environmental impact. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged environmental penalties. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties. [/INST] Judgment Text: Penalties were upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 914/2022 [/INST] Case Name: Central Bank of India vs. State of Kerala </s><s>[INST] Date: 25-05-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: S.A. Bobde, A.S. Bopanna [/INST] Legal Principles: Banking regulations and compliance. Internal control norms and penalties. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with internal control norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance. [/INST] Judgment Text: The penalties were upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 951/2022 [/INST] Case Name: State of Punjab vs. DEF Ltd. </s><s>[INST] Date: 05-09-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: N.V. Ramana, Surya Kant [/INST] Legal Principles: Tax evasion and corporate responsibility </s><s>[INST] Summary: The state accused the company of tax evasion. [/INST] Judgment Text: The company was found guilty and ordered to pay back taxes with penalties. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 543/2021 [/INST] Case Name: Hindalco Industries Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra </s><s>[INST] Date: 11-03-2021 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, S. Ravindra Bhat [/INST] Legal Principles: Environmental regulations and corporate liability. Compliance with pollution control norms. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with environmental regulations. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing corporate responsibility towards the environment. [/INST] Judgment Text: The penalties were upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 89012/2025 [/INST] Case Name: Rohit Verma vs. State of Punjab </s><s>[INST] Date: 22-09-2025 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: D.Y. Chandrachud, Hemant Gupta [/INST] Legal Principles: Labour law, workplace harassment, compensation </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner sought compensation for workplace harassment. [/INST] Judgment Text: The court awarded compensation to the petitioner. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 789/2022 [/INST] Case Name: Punjab National Bank vs. State of Haryana </s><s>[INST] Date: 22-08-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: R.F. Nariman, Navin Sinha [/INST] Legal Principles: Banking regulations and compliance. Fraud detection and penalties. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with fraud detection norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing the importance of regulatory compliance. [/INST] Judgment Text: The penalties were upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 1234/2021 [/INST] Case Name: Sunil Kumar vs. State of Maharashtra </s><s>[INST] Date: 18-04-2021 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: D.Y. Chandrachud, M.R. Shah [/INST] Legal Principles: Criminal law, bail applications, principles of bail. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner sought bail in a criminal case. [/INST] Judgment Text: The court granted bail, citing lack of evidence for continued detention. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 2345/2022 [/INST] Case Name: Ajay Gupta vs. Punjab National Bank </s><s>[INST] Date: 10-03-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, S. Ravindra Bhat [/INST] Legal Principles: Banking law, fraud disputes, recovery of funds. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged the bank's refusal to refund money lost due to fraudulent transactions. [/INST] Judgment Text: The court ordered the bank to refund the disputed amount. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 567/2021 [/INST] Case Name: ICICI Bank Ltd. vs. State of West Bengal </s><s>[INST] Date: 30-09-2021 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: N.V. Ramana, Krishna Murari [/INST] Legal Principles: Banking regulations and compliance. NPA recognition and penalties. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with NPA recognition norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, reinforcing the importance of regulatory compliance. [/INST] Judgment Text: The penalties were upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 987/2023 [/INST] Case Name: Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. vs. State of Karnataka </s><s>[INST] Date: 22-02-2023 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: U.U. Lalit, S. Ravindra Bhat [/INST] Legal Principles: Industrial regulations and compliance. Environmental impact assessments. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with environmental regulations. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, stressing the importance of adhering to environmental norms. [/INST] Judgment Text: The penalties were upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 955/2022 [/INST] Case Name: State of Assam vs. RST Enterprises </s><s>[INST] Date: 25-09-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: R.F. Nariman, Navin Sinha [/INST] Legal Principles: Corporate governance and regulatory compliance </s><s>[INST] Summary: The state challenged the company's governance practices. [/INST] Judgment Text: The company's practices were found compliant, and the case was dismissed. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 890/2019 [/INST] Case Name: Tata Motors Ltd. vs. State of Gujarat </s><s>[INST] Date: 05-10-2019 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: Arun Mishra, Vineet Saran [/INST] Legal Principles: Environmental regulations and compliance. Emission norms and penalties. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with emission norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing the importance of environmental compliance. [/INST] Judgment Text: The penalties were upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 456/2021 [/INST] Case Name: Suresh Prasad vs. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. </s><s>[INST] Date: 22-07-2021 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: D.Y. Chandrachud, M.R. Shah [/INST] Legal Principles: Contract law, breach of contract, specific performance. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner sought specific performance of a fuel supply contract. [/INST] Judgment Text: The court ordered the corporation to fulfill its contractual obligations. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 12345/2018 [/INST] Case Name: Priya Sharma vs. University of Mumbai </s><s>[INST] Date: 18-10-2018 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan [/INST] Legal Principles: Education law, examination disputes, interpretation of university regulations. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged her examination results. [/INST] Judgment Text: The court ordered a re-evaluation of the petitioner's answer sheets. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 926/2022 [/INST] Case Name: JKL Ltd. vs. State of West Bengal </s><s>[INST] Date: 30-04-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: K.M. Joseph, P.S. Narasimha [/INST] Legal Principles: Corporate governance and state intervention. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged state intervention in corporate governance. The Supreme Court upheld the intervention. [/INST] Judgment Text: State intervention was upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 927/2022 [/INST] Case Name: IDBI Bank vs. State of Manipur </s><s>[INST] Date: 30-06-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: R.F. Nariman, Navin Sinha [/INST] Legal Principles: Banking regulations and compliance. Fraud prevention norms and penalties. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with fraud prevention norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance. [/INST] Judgment Text: The penalties were upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 345/2021 [/INST] Case Name: Union Bank of India vs. State of Rajasthan </s><s>[INST] Date: 09-11-2021 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: S.A. Bobde, A.S. Bopanna [/INST] Legal Principles: Banking regulations and compliance. Basel norms and penalties. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with Basel norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance in banking operations. [/INST] Judgment Text: The penalties were upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 920/2022 [/INST] Case Name: OPQ Ltd. vs. State of Tamil Nadu </s><s>[INST] Date: 30-03-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: S. Abdul Nazeer, Krishna Murari [/INST] Legal Principles: Land acquisition and compensation. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged land compensation amount. The Supreme Court revised the compensation. [/INST] Judgment Text: Compensation was revised. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 921/2019 [/INST] Case Name: Punjab National Bank vs. State of Rajasthan </s><s>[INST] Date: 30-08-2019 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: S. Abdul Nazeer, Sanjiv Khanna [/INST] Legal Principles: Banking fraud and liability. Bank's duty of care towards customers. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The bank challenged a ruling holding it liable for a fraudulent transaction. The Supreme Court upheld the liability, emphasizing the bank's duty of care towards its customers. [/INST] Judgment Text: The bank was held liable and directed to compensate the affected customers. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 784/2020 [/INST] Case Name: Adani Power Ltd. vs. State of Gujarat </s><s>[INST] Date: 18-02-2020 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: A.M. Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari [/INST] Legal Principles: Regulatory compliance in the power sector. Tariff adjustments and contractual obligations. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged a regulatory order on tariff adjustments. The Supreme Court upheld the order, emphasizing the need for compliance with regulatory guidelines. [/INST] Judgment Text: The tariff adjustment order was upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 23456/2025 [/INST] Case Name: Sanjay Singh vs. State of Kerala </s><s>[INST] Date: 20-03-2025 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: A.M. Khanwilkar, Indu Malhotra [/INST] Legal Principles: Family law, child custody, welfare of the child </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner sought custody of his minor child. [/INST] Judgment Text: The court granted custody to the petitioner, considering the welfare of the child. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 789/2021 [/INST] Case Name: HCL Technologies vs. State of Haryana </s><s>[INST] Date: 18-06-2021 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: N.V. Ramana, S. Ravindra Bhat [/INST] Legal Principles: Corporate governance and compliance. Disclosure requirements and penalties. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with disclosure norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing the need for transparency in corporate governance. [/INST] Judgment Text: The penalties were upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 678/2018 [/INST] Case Name: Seema Devi vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India </s><s>[INST] Date: 20-11-2018 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan [/INST] Legal Principles: Insurance claims, policy interpretation, contractual disputes. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner sought settlement of an insurance claim. [/INST] Judgment Text: The court ordered the insurer to settle the claim. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 764/2020 [/INST] Case Name: Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. vs. State of Haryana </s><s>[INST] Date: 15-12-2020 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: U.U. Lalit, Vineet Saran [/INST] Legal Principles: Industrial safety regulations. Employer's liability for workplace safety. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged penalties imposed for violations of industrial safety regulations. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, underscoring the employer's responsibility for workplace safety. [/INST] Judgment Text: The penalties were upheld, and the company was directed to improve safety measures. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 7890/2020 [/INST] Case Name: Ramesh Kumar vs. Indian Railways </s><s>[INST] Date: 25-11-2020 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: N.V. Ramana, Krishna Murari [/INST] Legal Principles: Compensation for accidents, liability of Indian Railways. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner sought compensation for injuries sustained in a train accident. [/INST] Judgment Text: The court ordered Indian Railways to pay compensation to the petitioner. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 917/2022 [/INST] Case Name: Dhanlaxmi Bank vs. State of Jharkhand </s><s>[INST] Date: 10-08-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: S.A. Nazeer, Hemant Gupta [/INST] Legal Principles: Banking regulations and compliance. Credit risk management norms and penalties. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with credit risk management norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance. [/INST] Judgment Text: The penalties were upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 902/2022 [/INST] Case Name: Axis Bank vs. State of Maharashtra </s><s>[INST] Date: 15-05-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: A.M. Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari [/INST] Legal Principles: Banking regulations and compliance. Anti-money laundering norms and penalties. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with anti-money laundering norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance. [/INST] Judgment Text: The penalties were upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 345/2020 [/INST] Case Name: Axis Bank Ltd. vs. State of Kerala </s><s>[INST] Date: 14-11-2020 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: N.V. Ramana, Vineet Saran [/INST] Legal Principles: Banking regulations and compliance. KYC norms and penalties. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with KYC norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, reinforcing the importance of compliance in banking operations. [/INST] Judgment Text: The penalties were upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 901/2022 [/INST] Case Name: Paytm Payments Bank vs. State of Karnataka </s><s>[INST] Date: 11-04-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan [/INST] Legal Principles: Banking regulations and compliance. Cybersecurity norms and penalties. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with cybersecurity norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance. [/INST] Judgment Text: The penalties were upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 944/2022 [/INST] Case Name: MNP Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra </s><s>[INST] Date: 01-08-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: A.M. Khanwilkar, B.R. Gavai [/INST] Legal Principles: Corporate taxation and state taxes </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged the state's tax levy on corporate earnings. [/INST] Judgment Text: The tax levy was partially reduced. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 950/2022 [/INST] Case Name: ABC Enterprises vs. State of Haryana </s><s>[INST] Date: 30-08-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: R.F. Nariman, Navin Sinha [/INST] Legal Principles: Corporate law and mergers </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged the state's rejection of a proposed corporate merger. [/INST] Judgment Text: The rejection was overturned, allowing the merger to proceed. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 78901/2023 [/INST] Case Name: Rahul Verma vs. State of Punjab </s><s>[INST] Date: 05-09-2023 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: R.F. Nariman, B.R. Gavai [/INST] Legal Principles: Property law, adverse possession, title dispute </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner claimed adverse possession over disputed land. [/INST] Judgment Text: The court dismissed the claim of adverse possession. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 12345/2025 [/INST] Case Name: Geeta Devi vs. State of Himachal Pradesh </s><s>[INST] Date: 15-02-2025 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: N.V. Ramana, S.A. Bobde [/INST] Legal Principles: Land law, encroachment, eviction </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged her eviction from alleged encroached land. [/INST] Judgment Text: The court upheld the eviction order. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 901/2021 [/INST] Case Name: Hero MotoCorp Ltd. vs. State of Rajasthan </s><s>[INST] Date: 22-03-2021 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: A.M. Khanwilkar, Sanjiv Khanna [/INST] Legal Principles: Consumer protection and product liability. Recall obligations and penalties. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with product recall obligations. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing consumer protection. [/INST] Judgment Text: The penalties were upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 345/2022 [/INST] Case Name: Infosys Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra </s><s>[INST] Date: 20-12-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: D.Y. Chandrachud, B.V. Nagarathna [/INST] Legal Principles: Corporate governance and compliance. Audit requirements and penalties. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with corporate governance norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing the importance of audit compliance. [/INST] Judgment Text: The penalties were upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 67890/2023 [/INST] Case Name: Seema Singh vs. Union of India </s><s>[INST] Date: 18-08-2023 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: A.M. Khanwilkar, Indu Malhotra [/INST] Legal Principles: Employment law, wrongful termination, reinstatement </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged her wrongful termination from a government job. [/INST] Judgment Text: The court ordered reinstatement with back pay. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 56789/2025 [/INST] Case Name: Anjali Sharma vs. State of Odisha </s><s>[INST] Date: 25-06-2025 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: A.K. Sikri, S. Abdul Nazeer [/INST] Legal Principles: Human rights, custodial violence, compensation </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner sought compensation for custodial violence. [/INST] Judgment Text: The court awarded compensation to the petitioner. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 904/2022 [/INST] Case Name: HDFC Bank vs. State of Tamil Nadu </s><s>[INST] Date: 25-07-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: S.A. Nazeer, Hemant Gupta [/INST] Legal Principles: Banking regulations and compliance. Know Your Customer (KYC) norms and penalties. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with KYC norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance. [/INST] Judgment Text: The penalties were upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 45678/2024 [/INST] Case Name: Anil Khanna vs. State of Tamil Nadu </s><s>[INST] Date: 20-05-2024 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: A.M. Khanwilkar, Indu Malhotra [/INST] Legal Principles: Tax law, income tax, reassessment </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged the reassessment of his income tax returns. [/INST] Judgment Text: The court quashed the reassessment order. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 234/2022 [/INST] Case Name: Ashok Kumar vs. State Bank of India </s><s>[INST] Date: 25-02-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, S. Ravindra Bhat [/INST] Legal Principles: Banking law, loan defaults, recovery proceedings. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged the recovery proceedings initiated by the bank for a loan default. [/INST] Judgment Text: The court stayed the recovery proceedings, ordering a review of the loan agreement. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 456/2022 [/INST] Case Name: Vodafone Idea Ltd. vs. Union of India </s><s>[INST] Date: 01-06-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: N.V. Ramana, Krishna Murari [/INST] Legal Principles: Telecom regulations and compliance. Adjusted gross revenue (AGR) dues. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged the calculation of AGR dues by the Department of Telecommunications. The Supreme Court upheld the government's calculation, emphasizing the need for compliance with telecom regulations. [/INST] Judgment Text: The AGR dues calculation was upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 947/2022 [/INST] Case Name: State of Kerala vs. TUV Industries </s><s>[INST] Date: 15-08-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: U.U. Lalit, Hemant Gupta [/INST] Legal Principles: Labor law and workers' rights </s><s>[INST] Summary: The state challenged the company's unfair labor practices. [/INST] Judgment Text: The company was ordered to compensate the affected workers and improve labor conditions. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 56789/2023 [/INST] Case Name: Mohan Lal vs. State of Rajasthan </s><s>[INST] Date: 10-07-2023 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: N.V. Ramana, S.A. Bobde [/INST] Legal Principles: Criminal law, murder, self-defense </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner argued self-defense in a murder case. [/INST] Judgment Text: The court acquitted the petitioner on grounds of self-defense. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 78901/2025 [/INST] Case Name: Kavita Agarwal vs. State of Telangana </s><s>[INST] Date: 18-08-2025 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: U.U. Lalit, Vineet Saran [/INST] Legal Principles: Consumer protection, misleading advertisements, penalty </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner sought action against a company for misleading advertisements. [/INST] Judgment Text: The court imposed a penalty on the company and ordered corrective advertisements. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 916/2022 [/INST] Case Name: DEF Bank vs. State of Maharashtra </s><s>[INST] Date: 10-03-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: U.U. Lalit, Hemant Gupta [/INST] Legal Principles: Banking regulations and customer rights. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged banking fees. The Supreme Court upheld the fees. [/INST] Judgment Text: Banking fees were upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 456/2023 [/INST] Case Name: Tata Motors Ltd. vs. State of West Bengal </s><s>[INST] Date: 03-03-2023 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: S.A. Bobde, B.R. Gavai [/INST] Legal Principles: Industrial disputes and compensation. State liability in land acquisition for industrial purposes. </s><s>[INST] Summary: Tata Motors challenged the state's liability in compensating for land acquired for an industrial project. The Supreme Court ruled that the state was liable to compensate for the acquired land based on fair market value. [/INST] Judgment Text: The state was ordered to compensate based on market value. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 890/2019 [/INST] Case Name: Reema Verma vs. Delhi University </s><s>[INST] Date: 05-11-2019 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: S.A. Bobde, Deepak Gupta [/INST] Legal Principles: Education law, admission disputes, interpretation of university regulations. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged her denial of admission to a postgraduate program. [/INST] Judgment Text: The court ordered the university to admit the petitioner, citing procedural lapses. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 789/2020 [/INST] Case Name: Vijay Kumar vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi </s><s>[INST] Date: 15-03-2020 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: N.V. Ramana, Krishna Murari [/INST] Legal Principles: Municipal law, property tax disputes, interpretation of property tax laws. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner disputed the property tax assessment by the Municipal Corporation. [/INST] Judgment Text: The court ordered a reassessment of the property tax, finding discrepancies in the original assessment. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 923/2022 [/INST] Case Name: Lakshmi Vilas Bank vs. State of Sikkim </s><s>[INST] Date: 10-02-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: S.A. Nazeer, Hemant Gupta [/INST] Legal Principles: Banking regulations and compliance. Financial stability norms and penalties. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with financial stability norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance. [/INST] Judgment Text: The penalties were upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 01234/2025 [/INST] Case Name: Rajesh Gupta vs. Indian Oil Corporation </s><s>[INST] Date: 22-01-2025 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: D.Y. Chandrachud, Hemant Gupta [/INST] Legal Principles: Contract law, breach of contract, specific performance </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner sought specific performance of a fuel supply contract. [/INST] Judgment Text: The court ordered the corporation to fulfill its contractual obligations. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 907/2022 [/INST] Case Name: Union Bank of India vs. State of West Bengal </s><s>[INST] Date: 15-10-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan [/INST] Legal Principles: Banking regulations and compliance. Fraud detection and penalties. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with fraud detection norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance. [/INST] Judgment Text: The penalties were upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 915/2022 [/INST] Case Name: Yes Bank vs. State of Telangana </s><s>[INST] Date: 30-06-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan [/INST] Legal Principles: Banking regulations and compliance. Payment gateway norms and penalties. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with payment gateway norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance. [/INST] Judgment Text: The penalties were upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 922/2022 [/INST] Case Name: STU Corporation vs. Union of India </s><s>[INST] Date: 10-04-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: Ashok Bhushan, Vineet Saran [/INST] Legal Principles: Corporate law and regulatory compliance. </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged regulatory compliance costs. The Supreme Court upheld the costs. [/INST] Judgment Text: Compliance costs were upheld. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 12345/2026 [/INST] Case Name: Rajesh Malhotra vs. State of Gujarat </s><s>[INST] Date: 15-02-2026 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: R.F. Nariman, B.R. Gavai [/INST] Legal Principles: Tax law, GST compliance, penalty </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged a penalty imposed for non-compliance with GST laws. [/INST] Judgment Text: The court upheld the penalty. </s>

<s>[INST] Case ID: 956/2022 [/INST] Case Name: UVW Ltd. vs. Union of India </s><s>[INST] Date: 30-09-2022 [/INST] Court: Supreme Court of India </s><s>[INST] Judges: N.V. Ramana, Surya Kant [/INST] Legal Principles: Industrial law and labor disputes </s><s>[INST] Summary: The petitioner challenged the labor union's strike action. [/INST] Judgment Text: The strike was declared illegal and the union was fined. </s>