label
stringclasses 2
values | text
stringlengths 165
803
|
|---|---|
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Joseph knows whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Joseph knows whether Frankie's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Joseph's forehead is not muddy. Hypothesis: Frankie can now know whether Joseph can know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Kellie knows whether someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Kellie does not know whether Larry is thirsty. Hypothesis: Larry can now know that Kellie can know that someone is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Patricia's card is shown to Amber. Amber's card is shown to Brenda. Brenda's card is shown to Brenda. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Brenda can now know that someone picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Jennifer does not know whether Patricia is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Benjamin is thirsty. Hypothesis: Benjamin can now know whether Jennifer is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Thomas does not know whether William is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Doris is thirsty. It is publicly announced that William is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Doris is thirsty. Hypothesis: Doris can now know whether Thomas can know whether someone is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Tricia does not know whether Mildred is thirsty. Hypothesis: Harry can now know that Mildred can know whether Virginia is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). David's card is shown to David. David's card is shown to Richard. Richard's card is shown to Richard. Richard's card is shown to Susie. Catherine's card is shown to Susie. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Richard can now know whether Catherine can know whether Richard picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Cara's card is shown to Vasiliki. Cara's card is shown to Conrad. Jennifer's card is shown to Conrad. Vasiliki's card is shown to Cara. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Vasiliki knows whether someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Cara can now know whether Conrad picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Robert's card is shown to Lester. Lester's card is shown to Nathan. Robert's card is shown to Nathan. Nathan's card is shown to Karen. Lester's card is shown to Robert. Karen's card is shown to Robert. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Robert does not know whether Robert picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Lester knows whether or not nobody picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Karen picked a black card. Hypothesis: Karen can now know that Lester can know whether or not everyone picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Rachel's card is shown to Rachel. Patrica's card is shown to Stephen. Rachel's card is shown to Larry. Stephen's card is shown to Patrica. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Rachel does not know whether or not everyone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Rachel can now know whether or not nobody picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Justin knows whether Justin's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Jim can now know whether Justin can know that Justin's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Christopher knows whether someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Ruth can now know whether Jenna can know that nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Laura does not know whether James is thirsty. Hypothesis: Laura can now know that James can know whether James is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). John's card is shown to Nathaniel. Robert's card is shown to Nathaniel. Nathaniel's card is shown to John. Nathaniel's card is shown to Robert. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: John can now know whether or not nobody picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Carolyn knows whether or not nobody's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Freda can now know that Carolyn can know that Carolyn's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Shannon can now know whether Jason can know that Jason's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Dorothy's card is shown to Dorothy. Salvatore's card is shown to Salvatore. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Dorothy does not know whether or not everyone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Salvatore can now know whether Dorothy can know whether or not everyone picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Angel's card is shown to Angel. Warren's card is shown to Angel. Warren's card is shown to Warren. Angel's card is shown to Alexandria. Warren's card is shown to Alexandria. Alexandria's card is shown to Alexandria. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Warren can now know whether or not everyone picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that James knows whether James's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that James's forehead is not muddy. Hypothesis: James can now know that Nilda can know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Carole knows whether or not nobody's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Karen can now know whether Andrew can know whether Carole's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Mark knows whether someone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Margaret can now know that Mark is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Lori can now know that Marie can know that nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Gary does not know whether Gary's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Irving knows whether Jolanda's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Gary does not know whether Gary's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Jolanda can now know that Irving can know whether Irving's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Junior's card is shown to Junior. Sharon's card is shown to Junior. Jacqueline's card is shown to Junior. Junior's card is shown to Sharon. Sharon's card is shown to Sharon. Jacqueline's card is shown to Jacqueline. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Sharon can now know whether Junior can know whether or not nobody picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Burton's card is shown to Ruth. Randall's card is shown to Burton. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Ruth does not know whether or not everyone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Burton can now know whether Ruth can know that Burton picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Craig's card is shown to Angela. Craig's card is shown to Craig. Angela's card is shown to Clare. Clare's card is shown to Clare. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Craig does not know whether Angela picked a red card. Hypothesis: Clare can now know that Angela can know that everyone picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Elizabeth does not know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Elizabeth knows whether or not nobody's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Evelyn can now know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Robert's card is shown to Robert. Kathy's card is shown to Robert. Monique's card is shown to Robert. Robert's card is shown to Kathy. Kathy's card is shown to Kathy. Monique's card is shown to Kathy. Kathy's card is shown to Monique. Monique's card is shown to Monique. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Robert can now know whether or not nobody picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Louise does not know whether Louise's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Louise can now know that Louise's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Cynthia knows whether Cynthia's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Myrna knows whether Cynthia's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Jack can now know that Elizabeth can know that Jack's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Nancy's forehead is not muddy. Hypothesis: Glennie can now know that Kirk can know that someone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that William does not know whether William's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Patricia's forehead is not muddy. Hypothesis: Gay can now know whether William can know whether William's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Aaron's card is shown to Cheryl. Cheryl's card is shown to Aaron. Todd's card is shown to Aaron. Todd's card is shown to Todd. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Cheryl can now know that Todd can know that Todd picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Elizabeth's card is shown to Elizabeth. Evan's card is shown to Evan. Evan's card is shown to Joy. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Evan does not know whether or not everyone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Evan can now know that nobody picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Charles's card is shown to Herman. Charles's card is shown to Charles. Judith's card is shown to Judith. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that not everyone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Charles can now know whether Herman can know whether someone picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Jeffrey's card is shown to Jeffrey. Jessica's card is shown to Jeffrey. Jessica's card is shown to Spencer. Jessica's card is shown to Elizabeth. Elizabeth's card is shown to Jessica. Jessica's card is shown to Jessica. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Jessica can now know whether Elizabeth can know whether or not everyone picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Jeffery's card is shown to Mary. Mary's card is shown to Jeffery. Jeffery's card is shown to Jeffery. Sheldon's card is shown to Jeffery. Mary's card is shown to Sheldon. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Mary can now know whether someone picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). James's card is shown to James. James's card is shown to Maria. Maria's card is shown to Maria. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Maria knows whether or not nobody picked a red card. Hypothesis: Maria can now know that James can know whether or not nobody picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that not everyone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Patty does not know whether Christopher is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Christopher knows whether or not nobody is thirsty. Hypothesis: Christopher can now know that Michael is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Cindy's card is shown to Joshua. Joshua's card is shown to Joshua. Mitchell's card is shown to Mitchell. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Joshua picked a red card. Hypothesis: Joshua can now know that Joshua picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Lisa's card is shown to Shannon. Cody's card is shown to Shannon. Mariann's card is shown to Lisa. Shannon's card is shown to Cody. Cody's card is shown to Mariann. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Lisa can now know whether Shannon can know whether or not nobody picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Vernon's forehead is not muddy. It is publicly announced that Anne knows whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Vernon can now know that Douglas can know that nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Lauren knows whether Lauren's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Carl can now know that nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that William does not know whether William's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Dale can now know whether Ashley can know whether Ashley's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Krista's card is shown to Gene. Krista's card is shown to Anna. Thomas's card is shown to Krista. Gene's card is shown to Thomas. Krista's card is shown to Thomas. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Anna does not know whether or not everyone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Thomas can now know that Gene can know whether Krista picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Marlene does not know whether Elizabeth is thirsty. Hypothesis: Zaida can now know that Marlene can know whether Zaida is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Jonathan's card is shown to Sherry. Jonathan's card is shown to David. Alice's card is shown to David. David's card is shown to David. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Alice can now know whether Alice picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Victor can now know that Jose can know that everyone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Mike knows whether someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Mike knows whether Mike is thirsty. Hypothesis: Mike can now know whether Elizabeth can know that Elizabeth is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Mary can now know whether or not nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that James does not know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Lisa's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Gerri can now know that Albert's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Olive's card is shown to Olive. Jospeh's card is shown to Olive. Olive's card is shown to Mattie. Jospeh's card is shown to Mattie. Jospeh's card is shown to Jospeh. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Jospeh can now know that Mattie can know that nobody picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Stephen's card is shown to Stephen. Stephen's card is shown to Rachel. Rachel's card is shown to Rachel. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Stephen does not know whether Rachel picked a red card. Hypothesis: Stephen can now know that someone picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Kristine knows whether Michael's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Kristine can now know that Christopher can know whether Christopher's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Daniel knows whether or not everyone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Kris knows whether Kris is thirsty. Hypothesis: Kris can now know whether Kris is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that everyone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Nancy can now know that Walter is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Keith knows whether Keith's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Diana can now know whether Annette can know that nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Steven's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Troy can now know whether Maria can know whether someone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Maggie does not know whether Lori is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Stephanie does not know whether Lori is thirsty. Hypothesis: Lori can now know whether Maggie can know whether Stephanie is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Manuel's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Manuel can now know whether Tommie can know whether Joy's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Francis does not know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Jennifer knows whether Francis's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Francis can now know whether Jenny can know that Jennifer's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Anthony's card is shown to Yvonne. Yvonne's card is shown to Yvonne. Anthony's card is shown to Carl. Yvonne's card is shown to Carl. Yvonne's card is shown to Jim. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Anthony can now know whether Jim picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Esther does not know whether Connie is thirsty. It is publicly announced that not everyone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that not everyone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Esther can now know whether Connie can know that Connie is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Robert's card is shown to James. Jerry's card is shown to Jerry. James's card is shown to Robert. Jerry's card is shown to Charles. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: James can now know that Jerry can know whether James picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Eva's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Nancy knows whether someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Eva can now know that Nancy can know that nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Christine's card is shown to Russell. Russell's card is shown to Christine. Russell's card is shown to Amy. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Christine knows whether someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Russell does not know whether Travis picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Russell does not know whether Travis picked a red card. Hypothesis: Christine can now know that Russell picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Rodney's card is shown to David. Daniel's card is shown to David. Lillie's card is shown to David. David's card is shown to Rodney. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Rodney does not know whether or not everyone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Rodney can now know whether Lillie picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Sandra's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Ronald does not know whether Ronald's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Sandra can now know that Carmen can know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Edward does not know whether Lien is thirsty. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Randy knows whether someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Lien does not know whether or not everyone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Lien can now know that everyone is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Brenda's card is shown to Shelia. Shelia's card is shown to Brenda. Paul's card is shown to Brenda. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Paul knows whether someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Paul picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Shelia knows whether or not everyone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Shelia can now know that Paul can know that Shelia picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Eula can now know whether Charles can know that everyone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Kristen knows whether someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Kristen can now know whether Kyle can know whether Kristen's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Gregorio's forehead is not muddy. Hypothesis: Gregorio can now know that nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Kenneth does not know whether Kenneth's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Kenneth does not know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Mary can now know that someone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Heather knows whether Jerome's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Thomas can now know whether Jerome can know whether Jerome's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Nancy does not know whether Nancy's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Lucy can now know whether Nancy can know that nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Cameron's card is shown to Cameron. Cameron's card is shown to Eleanor. Eleanor's card is shown to Eleanor. Paula's card is shown to Paula. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Eleanor can now know that Cameron picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Robert can now know whether Ricky's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Judy does not know whether Judy's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Gerald knows whether Gerald's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Gerald knows whether Gerald's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Gerald can now know that Elise can know whether Gerald's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Thomas knows whether or not nobody's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Shara can now know that Thomas can know that Thomas's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Judith does not know whether Judith's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Judith's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Crystal's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Rutha's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Janet can now know that Rutha's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Joseph knows whether Joseph is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Luann does not know whether or not everyone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Beulah can now know that Luann can know whether Beulah is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Marion's forehead is not muddy. Hypothesis: Marion can now know that someone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Bill knows whether Andy's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Andy can now know whether Bill can know whether Bill's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Carol does not know whether Dorothy is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Gertrude does not know whether Carol is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Dorothy does not know whether or not everyone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Mary does not know whether Carol is thirsty. Hypothesis: Dorothy can now know that Gertrude can know whether Carol is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Dominick does not know whether or not everyone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Teresa does not know whether Patrick is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Patrick does not know whether or not everyone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Patrick does not know whether or not everyone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Dominick can now know that Teresa is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Lois's card is shown to Enrique. Enrique's card is shown to Lois. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Enrique does not know whether Enrique picked a red card. Hypothesis: Lois can now know whether Enrique can know whether Lois picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Dennis knows whether David's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Robert can now know that Dennis's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Richard knows whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Richard can now know that Richard's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Nicholas knows whether someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Nicholas can now know that everyone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Teri knows whether someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Anna knows whether Teri's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Phyllis does not know whether Phyllis's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Phyllis can now know whether Anna can know that Phyllis's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Jessica knows whether or not nobody's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Arletta can now know that Evelyn can know whether someone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Isaias does not know whether Isaias's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Rhonda knows whether or not nobody's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Rhonda does not know whether Rhonda's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Amy knows whether Isaias's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Amy can now know that Isaias's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Robin knows whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Robin knows whether Gladys's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Robin's forehead is not muddy. Hypothesis: Robin can now know whether Gladys can know that someone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Richard knows whether or not nobody's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Kerry's forehead is not muddy. Hypothesis: Kerry can now know that Paul can know that Richard's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Scott's card is shown to Scott. Kevin's card is shown to Scott. Scott's card is shown to Kevin. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Scott can now know whether Kevin can know whether Kevin picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Marie's card is shown to Carl. Madison's card is shown to Madison. Marie's card is shown to Marie. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Madison can now know whether Carl picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that everyone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Ollie is thirsty. Hypothesis: Michael can now know that someone is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Ruth knows whether Jackie's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Ruth can now know whether Mae can know that Mae's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that June knows whether June's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Amos knows whether Belinda's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Belinda can now know whether Belinda's forehead is muddy. |