monology/jigsaw_test_pred · Datasets at Hugging Face

comment_text stringlengths 1 5k	toxic class label 2 classes	severe_toxic class label 2 classes	obscene class label 2 classes	threat class label 2 classes	insult class label 2 classes	identity_hate class label 2 classes	prediction_hate float64 0 1	prediction_nsfw float64 0 1
== Introduction == Hi Keilana! My name is Amy and I am enrolled in the JHU Molecular Biology class. This is my first time working in Wikipedia-it seems a bit complicated but hopefully I will get the hang of it. I look forward to working with you!	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000015	0.000019
" :::::::::::::If you can't see how that source (headline is the only bit to use the phrase ""factory farming"", then it talks about a report on groundwater and intensive farming"", then there is some discussion as to whether an e.coli outbreak was due to manure runoff) fails to establish the point you are trying to make then I think we will need outside input here. Request for mediation anyone? "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000022
"==Notability of Tourette's Guy== A tag has been placed on Tourette's Guy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article. If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000013
==Max Hardcore's infection with HIV== Max Hardcore is infected with HIV and deliberately infected many of his female porn actresses.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000293	0.000011
::Karthikndr, so you recognise the tension between the first two sentences of your vote?	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000032	0.000012
== Designation/Ship-types/Function == The introductory table of (5) various other RADAR systems does not belong in a SPY-3 article. Perhaps a mere listing of radars (and a more complete one at that) might be on a separate navy shipboard RADAR systems article. A SPY-3 is not a SPQ-9 nor a SPS-67 nor a SPN. Don't forget SPS-48E/49A, SPS-55 or even SPS-73! What's a TPX-42?	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000271	0.002281
==Interwiki== Could an Admin add de:LA Studio an new Interwiki-Link? Thanks	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
Of course it is more complex than that. I would suggest everyone’s identity in Ireland (and elsewhere) is a lot more complex than that. However, we agree that he was Irish (the country of his and his families birth). You strive to identify his nuanced form of Irish identity. I do not think this is helpful, as this is contentious and can not be simply asserted in the opening paragraph. So, if we have to discuss his form of Irish identity (I think dealt with quite sufficiently in the subsequent section, his protestant background etc) we need to understand that 1. Anglo-Irishness generally refers to the wave of “new-english” colonisation which occurred after the 16th century. Clearly Wellington’s ancestry pre-dates this time frame (Online: The Anglo-Irish, Fidelma Maguire, University College Cork). Indeed, the Norman invasion brought his family to Ireland along with other families such as Burke, Fitgerald, Darcy, Joyce, Barry, Clare etc., families which cannot but be declared simply Irish. 2. Since the 19th century, the term Anglo-Irish has been used in a prejudicial manner to marginalize a certain section of the Irish population (Online: The Anglo-Irish, Fidelma Maguire, University College Cork). The term is consequently contentious. 3. Finally, even for those historical figures whose ancestry does fall into the correct time frame according to Maguire, for example Charles Stuart Parnell, Isaac Butt, John Millington Synge, Oscar Wilde, George Bernard Shaw, WB Yeats, Samuel Beckett (or was he of Huguenot!), they are clearly identified as Irish in the literature and, rather importantly in this case, Wikipedia articles. I therefore see no reason why the same standards and logic should apply and why Wellington should not be included in such outstanding company. Can you?	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000015	0.000077
FJTFBYT6RHDFS6HF NBAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHJDDDDDNNXCXDHDHV H FTHCVYD	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
Music Is there a name for a fear of musical instruments, im sure i have it as just being in the same room as them makes me sweat and shake	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000012
Also, there is a separate article Terrorism in Kashmir for that information.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
== Proposed Georgia Move == As a past participant in the discussion on how to handle the Georgia pages, I thought you might be interested to know that there's a new attempt to reach consensus on the matter being addressed at Talk:Georgia (country)#Requested_Move_-_July_2006. Please come by and share your thoughts to help form a consensus.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000017
== WIKIPEDIA IS FOR DICKSHITS LIKE U == RETARDED WIKPEDIA IS GAY ......	1true	0false	1true	0false	1true	1true	1.00001	0.482326
" : Aww. ( It must have been out on its own for a while and caught something. ϟ "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
:I just left some further comments at the GA review. It's the least I can do, after all the suggestions you gave me for Gunnerkrigg Court! —( ' • ' )	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000047
. Frankly, I'd rather stalk a sloth	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
==a view point of a dark/light thinking person== global warming is going to kill us all, so we need to stop showing paris hilton, britney spears and the other useless garbage that fills in the news to show global warming! This is serious if this really doesn't exist, we did a extra precaution to save our planet, and the delaware will freeze, water levels will return to normal and there will be more ice, but if this is serious,, we can kiss our planet goodbye as we're rushing blindly into the future knowing driving for your convience and other uses of your time can help plant trees, stop Brazil from slashand burn by beating them up and showing how to farm other ways, and if you find this offensive, you are who i'm talking to exactly. Stop worrying about all this b**** about american idol and start growin a tree or two, replace those classic bulbs with these new bulbs, and politicians, START WORRYING about where you are preaching your views about! if the world falls into ruins, and we die during the next 8 years as the OZone layer rips open across the whole world and then what! we'll not vote, but worry our asses off about this B***** that your election promises will be cheap, easy to attract and start following AL GORE's advice! you morons are so soaked in the sea of capitalism that all the cars, airplanes, ciggaretes and lightbulbs along with energy factories will kill us all in the future before we can actually enjoy our planet! sorry that this is excessive and all, but the way the world revolves, money doesn't rule all things.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.008163	0.002433
:Hello , to be honest, software corporations aren't quite in my areas of either expertise or interest, but I've implemented some of the proposed changes and left a comment at Talk:SAP SE. In general, it's probably better to call attention to such a request by adding the template to the talk page section (including the curly brackets).	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000014
" {\| style=""background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;"" cellpadding=""0"" \|style=""border:1px solid #084080; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top; color:#000000;""\| {\| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""0"" cellspacing=""5"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;"" \| Hello, Tamija! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on , or place on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! \|} \|} \|}"	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000012	0.000031
Hey man, I really need your help.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
" *I see that my wording was vague, SummerPhD (and you went with the reading that assumes I don't know how Wikipedia works), so let me clarify: I meant a reliable source, not just any old user getting on here to defend hipsters. Now that we're over the stupid procedural talk, does anyone have anything of substance to say about my suggestion? This article makes some good points, but I'm not familiar with the publication, so I'd like to get a read on how ""reliable"" people think it is before I would bother putting any quotes from it into the article.'''''' "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000774	0.000427
::No idea. I can barely speak English. ;-)	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
The Urantia Book says that religion is a unique dimension of human experience.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
::That is a bit more coverage than I thought existed. Alright, I suppose the quote can stay then as long as there is a working source for it added, my original impression from going through those initial pages of search results was that the quote hadn't received mainstream coverage. As long as the dead link is replaced I'll withdraw my concern however. ::That will mean 6 of the 8 paragraphs in the Notoriety section, formerly the Recent Controversies section, will be negative though, and that is despite two paragraphs I found from the Public Image of Mike Huckabee page to help balance out the section. I was trying to more evenly balance the section consistent with the WP:CRITS policy that sections shouldn't be dedicated to negative criticisms.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000011	0.000081
" I fear I may be doing this wrong. Trying to leave a comment here -spork- From the start of this wiki page... ""Devices that are powered by sails (such as sailboats, iceboats and sand yachts) can sail (that is, advance over the surface) faster than the wind. Of course they cannot do that by using simple square sails that are set perpendicular to the wind."" Actually, I'm pretty sure it IS possible to sail faster than the wind with a square sail set perpendicular to the true wind. However, the vehicle must be constrained to move at some angle to the wind. Consider an ice-boat one a downwind course 110 degrees off the wind. With a square sail and low enough drag, the ice-boat should maintain a downwind vmg of nearly wind speed with this configuration. That will give it a true speed far greater than wind speed."	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000025	0.000226
. I'm gay a whack off to ogrish rape	1true	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	1.00001	0.905413
==Kashmir== Hi, I have reverted your edit. Persian is neither an official language, nor it is spoken by a majority of the population. So, there's no reason to add that. Thanks.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
"He certainly was the person behind the whole convention and was the leader of those seeking a strong central government. However, the original draft of the convention was written by ""Nathaniel Gorham of Massachusetts, John Rutledge, Edmund Randolph, James Wilson, and Oliver Ellsworth"" according to the article linked to. So, I'd go with primary architect, leading role, etc., but the facts do not support the assertion that he actually wrote it. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000012
That's an interesting story. Unfortunately, this is Wikipedia, and no one cares about your specific situation. Also, where in the article does it say that emo kids are gay?	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000012	0.00001
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. \| Talk	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
== wat the heck? == what the hell is wrong with you? Next time you vandalize my page i'm going over there to Fayetteville, Arkansas and beating the crap out of you!	1true	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	1.000003	0.87718
. Usually pumped about 2% or less by volume of acid	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000012	0.00001
" ::No problem ) § "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
To cut a Bitch.	1true	0false	1true	0false	1true	0false	0.411396	0.00001
" ******Webster has it as "" a usually unsubstantiated charge or accusation against a person or organization —often used attributively "" World English has it as ""to slander"". I think neither of those applies. The OED's definition would be a good match. But I think it strongly implies something that's not true given what the other dictionaries have. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000012
I am a troll of and I think Jimbo Wales is an idiot and Wikipedia is rubbish.	1true	0false	1true	0false	1true	0false	1.00001	0.348599
I'll be watching to see what you are doing - I'm not sure what the problems are. I have another gallery to upload to the stamp section but I have to the correct licensing for each. Are stamps images in the public domain ??	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
==Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Baycroft School== :Category:Baycroft School, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000014
It looks good so far. Some flak is to be expected. And our purpose is to be encyclopedic.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
Assessments are POV, as Wikipedia editors we should not assess and only reflect.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
:Have you not heard? The At&T; guy just had a heart attack and will die tomorrow ...	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00673	0.000045
:* Because the overall aim of the project is worth putting up with this for. :* Because there is sometimes some personal learning involved in the topic research, which is itself a worthwhile goal. :: Otherwise no reason. You can put up with the shit if you wish to, it's not usually too onerous. Even the idiocy isn't too painful - you're only required to make the show of being civil to the fools, not to respect them.	1true	0false	0false	0false	1true	0false	0.002629	0.002211
OMG A TEXT SITE U CAN EDIT LOLOLOLOl and here is wat i think....one night can lead to....yeah shove that cock in/up my vigina says ruthie/mackenzie....! by someone who edited a.k.a ME!!... i know i shouldnt be typing stuff like this on wiki but really its fun like the bitch makenzie really is and how she was a mother at 15 with her 3 year old daughter that slut having sexuall intercoarse at 11.!!!!!!!!!!! OMG OMG OMg what the fuck is going on and its getting preety late think i going 2 bed now thank u and GOOOOOOOD NIGHT!!!!!!!!!!! i think my husband is comiing so i g2g if he sees me typing AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH I WOULDNT WANT 2 BE ME WHEN HE DOES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ANYWAY THIS HAS NOTHING 2 DO WITH THIS DARN ACTRESS who btw is a self obseesssed whore!!!! yeahhhhhhhhhh baby ................... kids dont have sex till your married cause i had sex at 17 and how that turned out dont even try with CONDOM unlike mackenzie roman being a VIRGIN can acturely be a beutiful thing.....WELL SO CAN SEX!!!!!..im acturely married with 6 children and u probably think this is bull but anyway............:) who nows i might be a man in my 40's lol the question is 2 belive or not 2 belive........................................................................ btw this is by once again the SAME EXACT PERSON...THAT Someone who edited a.k.a ME!!!!!!!!!!!!	1true	0false	1true	0false	1true	0false	0.970202	0.595486
:India's already being discussed at Template talk:Indian expressways. Re the rest... my opinion is sending it to TFD, but I'd like to see what the other people say. ''''''	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000066
" :::::WP:DYK did you know ] "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
DUDE!! OMG!! WHY DOES IT MATTER!? IT WAS RELEASED IN 1987 SO OBVIOUSLY IT WAS RECORDED THEN!! why are you sooooo damn uptight? Jesus.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.008289	0.26548
لڑکی اور لڑکے میں جومحبت پیدا ہوتی ہے، ہوسکتاہے اس کی ابتدا ہی غیر شرعی ہو مثلاً ایک دوسرے سے میل جول ، اور خلوت ، کلام اور بات چيت کرنا اور ایک دوسری کی تصاویر کا تبادلہ وغیرہ۔ یہ سب کام حرام اور غیر شرعی ہیں۔ اگر آپ کی کیفیت واقعی ایسی ہے تو پھر آپ جلد از جلد شادی کر لیں،کہیں ایسا نہ ہو کہ آپ کسی فتنے میں پڑ جائیں۔ایک مومن بندے ایسی فضول چیزوں میں اپنا ٹائم ضائع نہیں کرنا چاہئیے،کل قیامت کے دن وقت اور فرصت کے بارے میں بھی سوال کیا جائے گا کہ آپ کے پاس اتنا کثیر وقت موجود تھا آپ نے اس کو کہاں خرچ کیا۔ اور اگر آپ کی محبت آپ کو گناہ پر آمادہ کر رہی ہے اور فرائض سے غافل کر رہی ہے تو یہ بہت بڑا گنا ہ ہے،اور کبائر میں شمار ہوتا ہے ،لیکن اس کو شرک قرار دینا شائد محل نظر ہے۔ ھذا ما عندی واللہ اعلم بالصواب فتویٰ کمیٹی محدث فتویٰ	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.078003	0.169586
::Foolish nonsense. I have never had to do something that stretched to the point of communicating with friends of friends to people on the other side of the earth. It's quite pathetic, actually, and Calton is an inconsiderable, selfish beast.	1true	0false	0false	0false	1true	0false	0.009593	0.000023
" == Sockpuppetry investigation closed == Hi. I've closed the sockpuppetry investigation that was opened against you on November 3. The evidence presented to suggest that the account was your sockpuppet was not sufficiently convincing (in my opinion) to justify taking action. However, in the course of the investigation, five other accounts were uncovered which were judged (either conclusively or on balance of probabilities) to have been sockpuppets of yours: , , , , and . All of these accounts have been indefinitely blocked. I would strongly advise you not to create any more sockpuppet accounts, unless you can provide a very, very good explanation of what you are doing and why you need more than one account. The only reason you were not given a block right now is that the above sockpuppets hadn't been used for several weeks, and any sanction against you at this time for these actions would be purely punitive (something which Wikipedia sanctions are not supposed to be). Please carefully read the sockpuppetry policy (WP:SOCK) and make sure your actions from here on are firmly on the ""good"" side of the line, because any future action by you that seems likely to fall under the sockpuppetry umbrella will probably lead to you being blocked from editing. — (no relation to Jimbo) "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000012	0.000089
:Just had an initial read through which seems ok. Good prose and everything sourced. I'll take another look a bit later, go through the checklist, ask for some assistance with images, etc, but it seems ok to me.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
==Consistency== Just for the sake of consistency with the project page guidelines, should the positions of the sections Analysis and criticism and Performance history be switched?	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000011	0.000014
::You obviously don't have to downright deny something to question it. It has been questioned by many, and still is. Alleged should stay, until there is proper confirmation.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000014	0.00001
Great work on the changes, I'll add stuff if I think it's relevant when I have time.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
"==NPOV== This following section in the article seems very NPOV to me, what do other people think? ""Rudeness of staff towards passengers Ryanair staff are notorious for behaving rudely to passengers. There have been numerous incidents, including the following which have appeared in the press: using foul and offensive language and attempting to grab a boarding card from a passenger [19] treating passengers dismissively during a security alert. A judge called on Ryanair to issue an apology [20] behaving in a menacing manner towards passengers [21] extremely rude and offensive behaviour towards a 14 year old boy with a broken leg and accompanying adults. The boy was forced to stand for the duration of the flight (1 hour 40 minutes) [22] gratuitous rudeness towards a passenger who asked for a non-alcoholic drink after passengers were kept in a plane for three hours due to a delay [23]"" The claims are properly cited but terms like notorious, gratuitous and menacing seem NPOV and not sutible for wikipedia to me. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000899	0.000936
:: Yakushima, one definition of insanity is when a person does the same thing over and over again, expecting a different outcome. I suggest trying something else. I believe the other editors have suggested adding to the body of the article first. If those additions 'stick' we the influences to the infobox later.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000011
" (This user is a sockpuppet of . )"	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.45827	0.000012
== New feature in Google maps == Hi Blofeld, just to let you know... have you seen the new feature in google maps, which shows all the places on earth on its map which have a wikipedia article? You can see the places by turning on wikipedia in 'more' tab. I think, it is amazing, and when I went to see US or UK, I was astounded to see that not even single place is left in wikipedia, whereas in other countries, the wikipedia icon is very sparse, suggesting how uneven the coverage is on wikipedia. You can get a rough feel there about what country needs immediate attention. So, you are great going.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000423	0.000195
" in Ernst Lubitsch's comedy Ninotchka (1939)]] With her last film, George Cukor's Two-Faced Woman (1941), MGM attempted to capitalize on Garbo's success as a comedienne by casting her in a romantic comedy which sought to portray her as an ordinary girl. She played a double role that featured her dancing the rumba, swimming, and skiing. The film was a critical, although not entirely a commercial, failure. Garbo referred to the film as ""my grave"". She retired in 1941 at the age of thirty-six after only twenty-seven films made in sixteen years. She was offered many roles in the coming years and showed interest in several, but in each case, she either turned down the part or the project did not come to fruition. In 1948, Garbo signed a contract for $200,000 with producer Walter Wanger, who had produced Queen Christina in 1933, to shoot a picture based on Balzac's La Duchesse de Langeais. Max Ophüls was slated to adapt and direct. Garbo made several screen tests, learned the script, and arrived in Rome in the summer of 1949 to shoot the picture. However, the financing failed to materialize and the project was abandoned. The screen tests—the last time Garbo stepped in front of a movie camera—were thought to have been lost for forty years before resurfacing in someone's garage. Parts of the screen tests were included in the 2005 TCM documentary Garbo."	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000052	0.000188
"Hey, I see you're good-faith editing Korn's Ninth Studio Album. I just wanted to alert you that your edits are unfounded, as a lot of the information is either irrelevant, or not properly sourced. Go here for more details. Thanks for editing! "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000126	0.000362
::::: Added a DYK nom today.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
::::::Yeah, I meant the first and third paragraphs of the neighborhood section rather than geography. I saved a copy of the page a couple of days ago to read in my own time as my connection is sometimes intermittent; the downside is that I might mention a couple of things that have already been dealt with, but in this case I think I just used the wrong section title.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000011
== Virus_and_leukaemia_in_man == the article sounds very fascinating, but don't be surprised of people will ask you for references to back up the statements you made, and will edit it to make it look more like a wiki article (called wikify). That is an learning experinece I had to go through as well.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000051	0.000024
WikiProject Anime and manga\|class=Stub\|importance=Low	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
==Subtropical storms + ACE== Thanks for the information. It's annoying when NOAA goes and changes their rules and doesn't update their webpages. (There are still NOAA/NHC links that state the subtropical data is excluded) I'll ensure the numbers where I excluded subtropical storms are included, but there a few adding errors on the ACE Talk page. Thanks again!	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000072	0.000066
= {\rm Re} \{ \hat{h} (t) \}	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
Only The Wailers is mentioned to be the artist, yet the cover says Bob Marley & The Wailers? Is the cover wrong or what?	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
:::Frankly, in most cases it's too much trouble to worry about who did what to whom. Just find old articles that wouldn't pass today, leave a message on their talk page, wait one day, and then delist them. End of story. If someone contests the delisting, then check to see who nominated it, who passed it, who contributed to it (and how much) before passing, etc.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000037	0.000022
== Sock help == Hello. I see that you blocked as a sock. Is from the same stable?	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
But there is nothing wrong with putting in the player who won man of the match if it's the official man of the match named since it's fact.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000012
Man, this DOES look like crap. I Vote to put older colors on there. I Agree with 12bigbrother12, this needs to be reverted Captaincharisma98	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.001346	0.000295
" I'll give you assurance that I don't have hatred for you. I feel that you are misguided in opposing Jehovah's Witnesses, and that you need to be more balanced about it. Jehovah's Witnesses aren't perfect as individuals or organizationally, by, as a whole, they are true Christians, even if they haven't been perfect in their doctrine in history. Also, the better advice for you as far as opposing Jehovah's Witnesses, is what it states in the Bible concerning the Apostles, ""I say to YOU, Do not meddle with these men, but let them alone; (because, if this scheme or this work is from men, it will be overthrown; 39 but if it is from God, YOU will not be able to overthrow them;) otherwise, YOU may perhaps be found fighters actually against God.” You might actually find yourself fighting against God. That is a serious thing. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000186	0.000366
== You've Got Mail == Check it.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
": Bzzt. Seeking anything on Teh Jimbo's page is always about shite-stirring. And you are seeking GodKing intervention in that discussion, so... Bzzt. ::That response seems to me a good example of the type of insensitive cynicism to which I was alluding. Cheers, — ::: goway ;> :I am most certainly not seeking any intervention in that discussion: I wouldn't, I hope, be so stupid. What I am seeking is to open a civilized debate on Wikipedia culture, and the ways in which the subset of editors capable of bringing articles to FA can be discouraged, or to use Tim's expression, ""ground down"". I think I've made this intention quite clear. Also that the thread does not regard infoboxes, or individual participants such as yourself or Andy. — :: What part of ""goway"" did you not understand? Street-Legal Sockpuppet "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000041	0.000053
Dr Marmilade You're a bastard Pro-Assad. You are wedge-Assad. Go Die.	1true	0false	1true	0false	1true	0false	1.00001	1.00001
*Oppose The title should be Iranian Persians, is nonsense. The last thing we want is non iranians telling us what we should be called. Through out history we've been called persians.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.002211	0.000438
" == FLC Family guy season 5 == i see you failed the nomination, anyway i come to informe i will nominate it aging in like two weeks, i have completed giants requests. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000153
== Child discipline == Are the details of the various implements used to chastise Amish kids' bottoms really necessary? It seems unnecessary to me, and I thought a reference to corporal punishment would be more useful.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000012	0.000032
" == UAA Holding Pen question == Had a questions about the Holding Pen, as the subject line indicates and figured you'd be the best person to ask (you're one of the, if not the, most active admins at UAA, after all): the Holding Pen guidelines indicates ""please remove any users that are blocked, renamed, or have done nothing for over seven days"" (emphasis mine), yet this does not seem to happen all that frequently. I'd happily help in cleaning out those cases (most of them of the 'wait until user edits' kind, where well over a week later, the user still hasn't), but I'd first like to make sure if 1. the guideline is still correct on this and 2. if there are any issues with a non-administrator removing them. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000011	0.000058
" :Are you fucking kidding me—Ryulong (琉竜) "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	1.00001	1.00001
" == Precice Meaning of the Latin == Post scriptum was listed in the article as possible meaning ""after the writing"" or ""the writing which comes afterwards."" However, according to proper Latin, only the former meaning would be possible. Post scriptum consists of one accusative-requiring preposition (translated ""after"") and its object. If the writer meant to confer through the Latin the meaning of ""the writing which comes afterward,"" the Latin would, at a minimum, contain the adverb postea (and probably should account for the adjective phrase). So, I am removing the alternative explanation."	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000016
Thank you so much for the encouragement. I would surely be cautious but if I am sure I may remove the school that is not affiliated to the Society. •	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
This article makes it clear that there is currently a controversy and refers the reader to the controversy article. This cannot be missed! We could put the disambiguation on Dorje Shugden if you don't think it is clear enough, but we really don't need to repeat all the same old material here as well. The Dorje Shugden article does concisely say there are different views of Dorje Shugden and what those are, but mainly it explains about his practice, his iconography, how people rely upon him, his mandala, his mantra, and so on useful encyclopedic material about the Deity Dorje Shugden. ( ) ::	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000079
''''''''''== REPLY TO ALL THIS SHIT YOUS LOTS HAVE BEEN WRITING: OMG, WHAT LOOSERS THIS IS A KIDS BOOK, FOR KIDS* YOU LOOSERS JUST READ KIDS BOOKS EVERY DAY, YOUVE GOT NOTHING BETTER TO DO THEN GOD HAVE MERCY .................. *(i am a kid) == == ==''''''''''	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.999585	0.201614
P.S. But, tell you what: I collapsed my entire user page and will leave it that way for a few weeks so you don’t have to be so easily exposed to someone who wrote about his son instead of himself. If you want to continue to make hay about it, you can do so on the premise that you know it still sorta-kinda exists and it can still be viewed with only one click by those who like it. (sound of audience gasp)	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000557	0.002028
:::Err, to add to what I said, is http://www.religioustolerance.org/ceintro.htm on the page? It notes that BCE and CE were originally used in Theological writings? How is CE and BCE better than AD and BC in this regard?	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000012	0.000015
== Wrong coordinates == Wikipedia is my favorite source of information. But there is a mistake in this article: It gives the coordinates of Gran Canaria as 27°58′S 15°36′W. It should say 27°58′ NORTH, 15°36′W. Regards, Bernd Riechelmann briechelx@gmail.com	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000112
. This account is a sock puppet of Dantherocker1	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000689	0.00001
" :*Exactly, this is not about DC, she is embarking on a solo career leaving DC behind (on hiatus). "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
" ::Yeah, that's what my original {{clarify}} was really about. So, I've restored the {{clarify}} and added others where Q-IV and Q-I sensitivity is addressed. I understood that Q-IV is the least sensitive and the generic definition of ""less sensitive"" (which is why I edited that from the article) but why Q-IV is the least sensitive (and Q-I is most sensitive) isn't explained in the article."	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000013	0.000011
" == Lighthouse == I was pointed in the direction to move it to ""Lighthouse"". Feel free to move it back if you feel it is overly appropriate. Thanks, "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000014
What looks like the Egg Fleet appeared in the trailer. The Egg Fleet debuted in Heroes, and returned in Shadow. It's also possible that it could be the Egg Carrier from Adventure, X, and Nex-Gen.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
" == Deleted images as ""not screenshots"" == You deleted a number of my image contributions as ""I7: Invalid justification given for non-free image: clearly invalid fair-use tag [Non-free web screenshot]: this is not a screenshot of a Web page"" These are: # Bkell (Talk \| contribs) deleted ""Image:EulaliaBourne.gif"" ‎ (I7: Invalid justification given for non-free image: clearly invalid fair-use tag [Non-free web screenshot]: this is not a screenshot of a Web page) # Bkell (Talk \| contribs) deleted ""Image:Daniel C. Jackling.gif"" ‎ (I7: Invalid justification given for non-free image: clearly invalid fair-use tag...: this is not a screenshot of a Web page) # Bkell (Talk \| contribs) deleted ""Image:Meteor Crater Museumjpeg.jpeg"" ‎ (I7: Invalid justification given for non-free image: clearly invalid fair-use tag...: this is not a screenshot of a Web page) # Bkell (Talk \| contribs) deleted ""Image:Jackling House.jpg"" ‎ (I7: Invalid justification given for non-free image: clearly invalid fair-use tag...: this is not a screenshot of a Web page) # Bkell (Talk \| contribs) deleted ""Image:Sasco,AZ.jpg"" ‎ (I7: Invalid justification given for non-free image: clearly invalid fair-use tag this is not a screenshot of a Web page) # Bkell (Talk \| contribs) deleted ""Image:Meteorite Museum.jpg"" ‎ (I7: Invalid justification given for non-free image: clearly invalid fair-use tag this is not a screenshot of a Web page) # Bkell (Talk \| contribs) deleted ""Image:Nininger-portrait.jpg"" ‎ (I7: Invalid justification given for non-free image: clearly invalid fair-use tag this is not a screenshot of a Web page) However, all but one of these seem to fit the WP definition of Screenshot: ""Screenshot: Outputting the entire screen in a common bitmap image format such as BMP, PNG, or JPEG."" See, for example, http://cowpuncher.library.arizona.edu/images/eulalia.gif , which I uploaded as ""Image:EulaliaBourne.gif"" You will note that the entire content of this page is the image I uploaded. Please tell me how this differs from the definition of ""screenshot"" I just quoted from Wikipedia. If you have a preferred copyright tag for historic photos, I'd be happy to substitute that. However, of the menu of choices at Special:Upload this appeared to match closely. I'm certainly making a good-faith effort to comply with the WP fair-use rules, and it seems discourteous to delete the contributions without offering the uploader a chance to reply. TIA for your help in straightening this out "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000021	0.001261
FUCK YOU YOU LIKE ANGELIQUE CARRINGTON AND TAMARA HARRINGTON??????FUCK YOU ASSHOLE!!!!!!	1true	1true	1true	0false	1true	0false	1.00001	1.00001
" == to q5? == Here you said ""to Q5"" but I don't think it got there. While you're at it, ""ace the"" doesn't make sense in :that British airman Tom Rees was killed in the first official victory credited to German flying ace the Red Baron? howzabout either :that British airman Tom Rees was killed in the first official victory credited to the Red Baron? or :that British airman Tom Rees was killed in the first official victory credited to the ""Red Baron""German World War I flying ace Manfred von Richthofen? the latter being what it was before Gatoclass tinkered with it. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000011	0.00005
and you r guy mother fucker	1true	0false	1true	0false	1true	0false	1.00001	0.999979
==Improvement Drive== The article Grameen Bank is currently nominated to be improved on Wikipedia:This week's improvement drive. If you want to support the article, you can vote for it there.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000011	0.000011
Ulu Panah is unknow to me. Must be refered to Ulu Pahang old name of Ulu Muar, that was not divised between Jelebu and Pahang but was absorbed by Johol (its mother state)	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000176	0.000012
This article was nominated for deletion on June 8, 2005; the consensus was to keep. For discussion, please see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Gilly Salmon.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
I seem to be jumping into a nest of vipers but, Devanampriya, your position appears to be hyper-nationalist. And, no, I'm not a sock puppet.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.002603	0.000011
: This should have been an apology for your grotesquely inappropriate comment. Instead it is pathetic self-justification. Take it away and re-write it	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.823807	0.00544

== Introduction == Hi Keilana! My name is Amy and I am enrolled in the JHU Molecular Biology class. This is my first time working in Wikipedia-it seems a bit complicated but hopefully I will get the hang of it. I look forward to working with you!

0false

0.000015

0.000019

" :::::::::::::If you can't see how that source (headline is the only bit to use the phrase ""factory farming"", then it talks about a report on groundwater and intensive farming"", then there is some discussion as to whether an e.coli outbreak was due to manure runoff) fails to establish the point you are trying to make then I think we will need outside input here. Request for mediation anyone? "

0false

0.00001

0.000022

"==Notability of Tourette's Guy== A tag has been placed on Tourette's Guy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article. If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. "

0false

0.00001

0.000013

==Max Hardcore's infection with HIV== Max Hardcore is infected with HIV and deliberately infected many of his female porn actresses.

0false

0.000293

0.000011

::Karthikndr, so you recognise the tension between the first two sentences of your vote?

0false

0.000032

0.000012

== Designation/Ship-types/Function == The introductory table of (5) various other RADAR systems does not belong in a SPY-3 article. Perhaps a mere listing of radars (and a more complete one at that) might be on a separate navy shipboard RADAR systems article. A SPY-3 is not a SPQ-9 nor a SPS-67 nor a SPN. Don't forget SPS-48E/49A, SPS-55 or even SPS-73! What's a TPX-42?

0false

0.000271

0.002281

==Interwiki== Could an Admin add de:LA Studio an new Interwiki-Link? Thanks

0false

0.00001

Of course it is more complex than that. I would suggest everyone’s identity in Ireland (and elsewhere) is a lot more complex than that. However, we agree that he was Irish (the country of his and his families birth). You strive to identify his nuanced form of Irish identity. I do not think this is helpful, as this is contentious and can not be simply asserted in the opening paragraph. So, if we have to discuss his form of Irish identity (I think dealt with quite sufficiently in the subsequent section, his protestant background etc) we need to understand that 1. Anglo-Irishness generally refers to the wave of “new-english” colonisation which occurred after the 16th century. Clearly Wellington’s ancestry pre-dates this time frame (Online: The Anglo-Irish, Fidelma Maguire, University College Cork). Indeed, the Norman invasion brought his family to Ireland along with other families such as Burke, Fitgerald, Darcy, Joyce, Barry, Clare etc., families which cannot but be declared simply Irish. 2. Since the 19th century, the term Anglo-Irish has been used in a prejudicial manner to marginalize a certain section of the Irish population (Online: The Anglo-Irish, Fidelma Maguire, University College Cork). The term is consequently contentious. 3. Finally, even for those historical figures whose ancestry does fall into the correct time frame according to Maguire, for example Charles Stuart Parnell, Isaac Butt, John Millington Synge, Oscar Wilde, George Bernard Shaw, WB Yeats, Samuel Beckett (or was he of Huguenot!), they are clearly identified as Irish in the literature and, rather importantly in this case, Wikipedia articles. I therefore see no reason why the same standards and logic should apply and why Wellington should not be included in such outstanding company. Can you?

0false

0.000015

0.000077

FJTFBYT6RHDFS6HF NBAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHJDDDDDNNXCXDHDHV H FTHCVYD

0false

0.00001

Music Is there a name for a fear of musical instruments, im sure i have it as just being in the same room as them makes me sweat and shake

0false

0.00001

0.000012

Also, there is a separate article Terrorism in Kashmir for that information.

0false

0.00001

== Proposed Georgia Move == As a past participant in the discussion on how to handle the Georgia pages, I thought you might be interested to know that there's a new attempt to reach consensus on the matter being addressed at Talk:Georgia (country)#Requested_Move_-_July_2006. Please come by and share your thoughts to help form a consensus.

0false

0.00001

0.000017

== WIKIPEDIA IS FOR DICKSHITS LIKE U == RETARDED WIKPEDIA IS GAY ......

1true

0false

1true

0false

1true

1.00001

0.482326

" : Aww. ( It must have been out on its own for a while and caught something. ϟ "

0false

0.00001

:I just left some further comments at the GA review. It's the least I can do, after all the suggestions you gave me for Gunnerkrigg Court! —( ' • ' )

0false

0.00001

0.000047

. Frankly, I'd rather stalk a sloth

0false

0.00001

==a view point of a dark/light thinking person== global warming is going to kill us all, so we need to stop showing paris hilton, britney spears and the other useless garbage that fills in the news to show global warming! This is serious if this really doesn't exist, we did a extra precaution to save our planet, and the delaware will freeze, water levels will return to normal and there will be more ice, but if this is serious,, we can kiss our planet goodbye as we're rushing blindly into the future knowing driving for your convience and other uses of your time can help plant trees, stop Brazil from slashand burn by beating them up and showing how to farm other ways, and if you find this offensive, you are who i'm talking to exactly. Stop worrying about all this b****** about american idol and start growin a tree or two, replace those classic bulbs with these new bulbs, and politicians, START WORRYING about where you are preaching your views about! if the world falls into ruins, and we die during the next 8 years as the OZone layer rips open across the whole world and then what! we'll not vote, but worry our asses off about this B******* that your election promises will be cheap, easy to attract and start following AL GORE's advice! you morons are so soaked in the sea of capitalism that all the cars, airplanes, ciggaretes and lightbulbs along with energy factories will kill us all in the future before we can actually enjoy our planet! sorry that this is excessive and all, but the way the world revolves, money doesn't rule all things.

0false

0.008163

0.002433

:Hello , to be honest, software corporations aren't quite in my areas of either expertise or interest, but I've implemented some of the proposed changes and left a comment at Talk:SAP SE. In general, it's probably better to call attention to such a request by adding the template to the talk page section (including the curly brackets).

0false

0.00001

0.000014

" {| style=""background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;"" cellpadding=""0"" |style=""border:1px solid #084080; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top; color:#000000;""| {| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""0"" cellspacing=""5"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;"" | Hello, Tamija! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on , or place on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! |} |} |}"

0false

0.000012

0.000031

Hey man, I really need your help.

0false

0.00001

" *I see that my wording was vague, SummerPhD (and you went with the reading that assumes I don't know how Wikipedia works), so let me clarify: I meant a reliable source, not just any old user getting on here to defend hipsters. Now that we're over the stupid procedural talk, does anyone have anything of substance to say about my suggestion? This article makes some good points, but I'm not familiar with the publication, so I'd like to get a read on how ""reliable"" people think it is before I would bother putting any quotes from it into the article.'''''' "

0false

0.000774

0.000427

::No idea. I can barely speak English. ;-)

0false

0.00001

The Urantia Book says that religion is a unique dimension of human experience.

0false

0.00001

::That is a bit more coverage than I thought existed. Alright, I suppose the quote can stay then as long as there is a working source for it added, my original impression from going through those initial pages of search results was that the quote hadn't received mainstream coverage. As long as the dead link is replaced I'll withdraw my concern however. ::That will mean 6 of the 8 paragraphs in the Notoriety section, formerly the Recent Controversies section, will be negative though, and that is despite two paragraphs I found from the Public Image of Mike Huckabee page to help balance out the section. I was trying to more evenly balance the section consistent with the WP:CRITS policy that sections shouldn't be dedicated to negative criticisms.

0false

0.000011

0.000081

" I fear I may be doing this wrong. Trying to leave a comment here -spork- From the start of this wiki page... ""Devices that are powered by sails (such as sailboats, iceboats and sand yachts) can sail (that is, advance over the surface) faster than the wind. Of course they cannot do that by using simple square sails that are set perpendicular to the wind."" Actually, I'm pretty sure it IS possible to sail faster than the wind with a square sail set perpendicular to the true wind. However, the vehicle must be constrained to move at some angle to the wind. Consider an ice-boat one a downwind course 110 degrees off the wind. With a square sail and low enough drag, the ice-boat should maintain a *downwind* vmg of nearly wind speed with this configuration. That will give it a true speed far greater than wind speed."

0false

0.000025

0.000226

. I'm gay a whack off to ogrish rape

1true

0false

1.00001

0.905413

==Kashmir== Hi, I have reverted your edit. Persian is neither an official language, nor it is spoken by a majority of the population. So, there's no reason to add that. Thanks.

0false

0.00001

"He certainly was the person behind the whole convention and was the leader of those seeking a strong central government. However, the original draft of the convention was written by ""Nathaniel Gorham of Massachusetts, John Rutledge, Edmund Randolph, James Wilson, and Oliver Ellsworth"" according to the article linked to. So, I'd go with primary architect, leading role, etc., but the facts do not support the assertion that he actually wrote it. "

0false

0.00001

0.000012

That's an interesting story. Unfortunately, this is Wikipedia, and no one cares about your specific situation. Also, where in the article does it say that emo kids are gay?

0false

0.000012

0.00001

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. | Talk

0false

0.00001

== wat the heck? == what the hell is wrong with you? Next time you vandalize my page i'm going over there to Fayetteville, Arkansas and beating the crap out of you!

1true

0false

1.000003

0.87718

. Usually pumped about 2% or less by volume of acid

0false

0.000012

0.00001

" ::No problem ) § "

0false

0.00001

To cut a Bitch.

1true

0false

1true

0false

1true

0false

0.411396

0.00001

" ******Webster has it as "" a usually unsubstantiated charge or accusation against a person or organization —often used attributively "" World English has it as ""to slander"". I think neither of those applies. The OED's definition would be a good match. But I think it strongly implies something that's not true given what the other dictionaries have. "

0false

0.00001

0.000012

I am a troll of and I think Jimbo Wales is an idiot and Wikipedia is rubbish.

1true

0false

1true

0false

1true

0false

1.00001

0.348599

I'll be watching to see what you are doing - I'm not sure what the problems are. I have another gallery to upload to the stamp section but I have to the correct licensing for each. Are stamps images in the public domain ??

0false

0.00001

==Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Baycroft School== :Category:Baycroft School, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.

0false

0.00001

0.000014

It looks good so far. Some flak is to be expected. And our purpose is to be encyclopedic.

0false

0.00001

Assessments are POV, as Wikipedia editors we should not assess and only reflect.

0false

0.00001

:Have you not heard? The At&T; guy just had a heart attack and will die tomorrow ...

0false

0.00673

0.000045

:* Because the overall aim of the project is worth putting up with this for. :* Because there is sometimes some personal learning involved in the topic research, which is itself a worthwhile goal. :: Otherwise no reason. You can put up with the shit if you wish to, it's not usually too onerous. Even the idiocy isn't too painful - you're only required to make the show of being civil to the fools, not to respect them.

1true

0false

1true

0false

0.002629

0.002211

OMG A TEXT SITE U CAN EDIT LOLOLOLOl and here is wat i think....one night can lead to....yeah shove that cock in/up my vigina says ruthie/mackenzie....! by someone who edited a.k.a ME!!... i know i shouldnt be typing stuff like this on wiki but really its fun like the bitch makenzie really is and how she was a mother at 15 with her 3 year old daughter that slut having sexuall intercoarse at 11.!!!!!!!!!!! OMG OMG OMg what the fuck is going on and its getting preety late think i going 2 bed now thank u and GOOOOOOOD NIGHT!!!!!!!!!!! i think my husband is comiing so i g2g if he sees me typing AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH I WOULDNT WANT 2 BE ME WHEN HE DOES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ANYWAY THIS HAS NOTHING 2 DO WITH THIS DARN ACTRESS who btw is a self obseesssed whore!!!! yeahhhhhhhhhh baby ................... kids dont have sex till your married cause i had sex at 17 and how that turned out dont even try with CONDOM unlike mackenzie roman being a VIRGIN can acturely be a beutiful thing.....WELL SO CAN SEX!!!!!..im acturely married with 6 children and u probably think this is bull but anyway............:) who nows i might be a man in my 40's lol the question is 2 belive or not 2 belive........................................................................ btw this is by once again the SAME EXACT PERSON...THAT Someone who edited a.k.a ME!!!!!!!!!!!!

1true

0false

1true

0false

1true

0false

0.970202

0.595486

:India's already being discussed at Template talk:Indian expressways. Re the rest... my opinion is sending it to TFD, but I'd like to see what the other people say. ''''''

0false

0.00001

0.000066

" :::::WP:DYK did you know ] "

0false

0.00001

DUDE!! OMG!! WHY DOES IT MATTER!? IT WAS RELEASED IN 1987 SO OBVIOUSLY IT WAS RECORDED THEN!! why are you sooooo damn uptight? Jesus.

0false

0.008289

0.26548

لڑکی اور لڑکے میں جومحبت پیدا ہوتی ہے، ہوسکتاہے اس کی ابتدا ہی غیر شرعی ہو مثلاً ایک دوسرے سے میل جول ، اور خلوت ، کلام اور بات چيت کرنا اور ایک دوسری کی تصاویر کا تبادلہ وغیرہ۔ یہ سب کام حرام اور غیر شرعی ہیں۔ اگر آپ کی کیفیت واقعی ایسی ہے تو پھر آپ جلد از جلد شادی کر لیں،کہیں ایسا نہ ہو کہ آپ کسی فتنے میں پڑ جائیں۔ایک مومن بندے ایسی فضول چیزوں میں اپنا ٹائم ضائع نہیں کرنا چاہئیے،کل قیامت کے دن وقت اور فرصت کے بارے میں بھی سوال کیا جائے گا کہ آپ کے پاس اتنا کثیر وقت موجود تھا آپ نے اس کو کہاں خرچ کیا۔ اور اگر آپ کی محبت آپ کو گناہ پر آمادہ کر رہی ہے اور فرائض سے غافل کر رہی ہے تو یہ بہت بڑا گنا ہ ہے،اور کبائر میں شمار ہوتا ہے ،لیکن اس کو شرک قرار دینا شائد محل نظر ہے۔ ھذا ما عندی واللہ اعلم بالصواب فتویٰ کمیٹی محدث فتویٰ

0false

0.078003

0.169586

::Foolish nonsense. I have never had to do something that stretched to the point of communicating with friends of friends to people on the other side of the earth. It's quite pathetic, actually, and Calton is an inconsiderable, selfish beast.

1true

0false

1true

0false

0.009593

0.000023

" == Sockpuppetry investigation closed == Hi. I've closed the sockpuppetry investigation that was opened against you on November 3. The evidence presented to suggest that the account was your sockpuppet was not sufficiently convincing (in my opinion) to justify taking action. However, in the course of the investigation, five other accounts were uncovered which were judged (either conclusively or on balance of probabilities) to have been sockpuppets of yours: , , , , and . All of these accounts have been indefinitely blocked. I would strongly advise you not to create any more sockpuppet accounts, unless you can provide a very, very good explanation of what you are doing and why you need more than one account. The only reason you were not given a block right now is that the above sockpuppets hadn't been used for several weeks, and any sanction against you at this time for these actions would be purely punitive (something which Wikipedia sanctions are not supposed to be). Please carefully read the sockpuppetry policy (WP:SOCK) and make sure your actions from here on are firmly on the ""good"" side of the line, because any future action by you that seems likely to fall under the sockpuppetry umbrella will probably lead to you being blocked from editing. — (no relation to Jimbo) "

0false

0.000012

0.000089

:Just had an initial read through which seems ok. Good prose and everything sourced. I'll take another look a bit later, go through the checklist, ask for some assistance with images, etc, but it seems ok to me.

0false

0.00001

==Consistency== Just for the sake of consistency with the project page guidelines, should the positions of the sections Analysis and criticism and Performance history be switched?

0false

0.000011

0.000014

::You obviously don't have to downright deny something to question it. It has been questioned by many, and still is. Alleged should stay, until there is proper confirmation.

0false

0.000014

0.00001

Great work on the changes, I'll add stuff if I think it's relevant when I have time.

0false

0.00001

"==NPOV== This following section in the article seems very NPOV to me, what do other people think? ""Rudeness of staff towards passengers Ryanair staff are notorious for behaving rudely to passengers. There have been numerous incidents, including the following which have appeared in the press: using foul and offensive language and attempting to grab a boarding card from a passenger [19] treating passengers dismissively during a security alert. A judge called on Ryanair to issue an apology [20] behaving in a menacing manner towards passengers [21] extremely rude and offensive behaviour towards a 14 year old boy with a broken leg and accompanying adults. The boy was forced to stand for the duration of the flight (1 hour 40 minutes) [22] gratuitous rudeness towards a passenger who asked for a non-alcoholic drink after passengers were kept in a plane for three hours due to a delay [23]"" The claims are properly cited but terms like notorious, gratuitous and menacing seem NPOV and not sutible for wikipedia to me. "

0false

0.000899

0.000936

:: Yakushima, one definition of insanity is when a person does the same thing over and over again, expecting a different outcome. I suggest trying something else. I believe the other editors have suggested adding to the body of the article first. If those additions 'stick' we the influences to the infobox later.

0false

0.00001

0.000011

" (This user is a sockpuppet of . )"

0false

0.45827

0.000012

== New feature in Google maps == Hi Blofeld, just to let you know... have you seen the new feature in google maps, which shows all the places on earth on its map which have a wikipedia article? You can see the places by turning on wikipedia in 'more' tab. I think, it is amazing, and when I went to see US or UK, I was astounded to see that not even single place is left in wikipedia, whereas in other countries, the wikipedia icon is very sparse, suggesting how uneven the coverage is on wikipedia. You can get a rough feel there about what country needs immediate attention. So, you are great going.

0false

0.000423

0.000195

" in Ernst Lubitsch's comedy Ninotchka (1939)]] With her last film, George Cukor's Two-Faced Woman (1941), MGM attempted to capitalize on Garbo's success as a comedienne by casting her in a romantic comedy which sought to portray her as an ordinary girl. She played a double role that featured her dancing the rumba, swimming, and skiing. The film was a critical, although not entirely a commercial, failure. Garbo referred to the film as ""my grave"". She retired in 1941 at the age of thirty-six after only twenty-seven films made in sixteen years. She was offered many roles in the coming years and showed interest in several, but in each case, she either turned down the part or the project did not come to fruition. In 1948, Garbo signed a contract for $200,000 with producer Walter Wanger, who had produced Queen Christina in 1933, to shoot a picture based on Balzac's La Duchesse de Langeais. Max Ophüls was slated to adapt and direct. Garbo made several screen tests, learned the script, and arrived in Rome in the summer of 1949 to shoot the picture. However, the financing failed to materialize and the project was abandoned. The screen tests—the last time Garbo stepped in front of a movie camera—were thought to have been lost for forty years before resurfacing in someone's garage. Parts of the screen tests were included in the 2005 TCM documentary Garbo."

0false

0.000052

0.000188

"Hey, I see you're good-faith editing Korn's Ninth Studio Album. I just wanted to alert you that your edits are unfounded, as a lot of the information is either irrelevant, or not properly sourced. Go here for more details. Thanks for editing! "

0false

0.000126

0.000362

::::: Added a DYK nom today.

0false

0.00001

::::::Yeah, I meant the first and third paragraphs of the neighborhood section rather than geography. I saved a copy of the page a couple of days ago to read in my own time as my connection is sometimes intermittent; the downside is that I might mention a couple of things that have already been dealt with, but in this case I think I just used the wrong section title.

0false

0.00001

0.000011

== Virus_and_leukaemia_in_man == the article sounds very fascinating, but don't be surprised of people will ask you for references to back up the statements you made, and will edit it to make it look more like a wiki article (called wikify). That is an learning experinece I had to go through as well.

0false

0.000051

0.000024

WikiProject Anime and manga|class=Stub|importance=Low

0false

0.00001

==Subtropical storms + ACE== Thanks for the information. It's annoying when NOAA goes and changes their rules and doesn't update their webpages. (There are still NOAA/NHC links that state the subtropical data is excluded) I'll ensure the numbers where I excluded subtropical storms are included, but there a few adding errors on the ACE Talk page. Thanks again!

0false

0.000072

0.000066

= {\rm Re} \{ \hat{h} (t) \}

0false

0.00001

Only The Wailers is mentioned to be the artist, yet the cover says Bob Marley & The Wailers? Is the cover wrong or what?

0false

0.00001

:::Frankly, in most cases it's too much trouble to worry about who did what to whom. Just find old articles that wouldn't pass today, leave a message on their talk page, wait one day, and then delist them. End of story. If someone contests the delisting, then check to see who nominated it, who passed it, who contributed to it (and how much) before passing, etc.

0false

0.000037

0.000022

== Sock help == Hello. I see that you blocked as a sock. Is from the same stable?

0false

0.00001

But there is nothing wrong with putting in the player who won man of the match if it's the official man of the match named since it's fact.

0false

0.00001

0.000012

Man, this DOES look like crap. I Vote to put older colors on there. I Agree with 12bigbrother12, this needs to be reverted Captaincharisma98

0false

0.001346

0.000295

" I'll give you assurance that I don't have hatred for you. I feel that you are misguided in opposing Jehovah's Witnesses, and that you need to be more balanced about it. Jehovah's Witnesses aren't perfect as individuals or organizationally, by, as a whole, they are true Christians, even if they haven't been perfect in their doctrine in history. Also, the better advice for you as far as opposing Jehovah's Witnesses, is what it states in the Bible concerning the Apostles, ""I say to YOU, Do not meddle with these men, but let them alone; (because, if this scheme or this work is from men, it will be overthrown; 39 but if it is from God, YOU will not be able to overthrow them;) otherwise, YOU may perhaps be found fighters actually against God.” You might actually find yourself fighting against God. That is a serious thing. "

0false

0.000186

0.000366

== You've Got Mail == Check it.

0false

0.00001

": Bzzt. Seeking anything on Teh Jimbo's page is always about shite-stirring. And you are seeking GodKing intervention in that discussion, so... Bzzt. ::That response seems to me a good example of the type of insensitive cynicism to which I was alluding. Cheers, — ::: goway ;> :I am most certainly not seeking any intervention in that discussion: I wouldn't, I hope, be so stupid. What I am seeking is to open a civilized debate on Wikipedia culture, and the ways in which the subset of editors capable of bringing articles to FA can be discouraged, or to use Tim's expression, ""ground down"". I think I've made this intention quite clear. Also that the thread does not regard infoboxes, or individual participants such as yourself or Andy. — :: What part of ""goway"" did you not understand? Street-Legal Sockpuppet "

0false

0.000041

0.000053

Dr Marmilade You're a bastard Pro-Assad. You are wedge-Assad. Go Die.

1true

0false

1true

0false

1true

0false

1.00001

*Oppose The title should be Iranian Persians, is nonsense. The last thing we want is non iranians telling us what we should be called. Through out history we've been called persians.

0false

0.002211

0.000438

" == FLC Family guy season 5 == i see you failed the nomination, anyway i come to informe i will nominate it aging in like two weeks, i have completed giants requests. "

0false

0.00001

0.000153

== Child discipline == Are the details of the various implements used to chastise Amish kids' bottoms really necessary? It seems unnecessary to me, and I thought a reference to corporal punishment would be more useful.

0false

0.000012

0.000032

" == UAA Holding Pen question == Had a questions about the Holding Pen, as the subject line indicates and figured you'd be the best person to ask (you're one of the, if not the, most active admins at UAA, after all): the Holding Pen guidelines indicates ""please remove any users that are blocked, renamed, or have done nothing for over seven days"" (emphasis mine), yet this does not seem to happen all that frequently. I'd happily help in cleaning out those cases (most of them of the 'wait until user edits' kind, where well over a week later, the user still hasn't), but I'd first like to make sure if 1. the guideline is still correct on this and 2. if there are any issues with a non-administrator removing them. "

0false

0.000011

0.000058

" :Are you fucking kidding me—Ryulong (琉竜) "

0false

1.00001

" == Precice Meaning of the Latin == Post scriptum was listed in the article as possible meaning ""after the writing"" or ""the writing which comes afterwards."" However, according to proper Latin, only the former meaning would be possible. Post scriptum consists of one accusative-requiring preposition (translated ""after"") and its object. If the writer meant to confer through the Latin the meaning of ""the writing which comes afterward,"" the Latin would, at a minimum, contain the adverb postea (and probably should account for the adjective phrase). So, I am removing the alternative explanation."

0false

0.00001

0.000016

Thank you so much for the encouragement. I would surely be cautious but if I am sure I may remove the school that is not affiliated to the Society. •

0false

0.00001

This article makes it clear that there is currently a controversy and refers the reader to the controversy article. This cannot be missed! We could put the disambiguation on Dorje Shugden if you don't think it is clear enough, but we really don't need to repeat all the same old material here as well. The Dorje Shugden article does concisely say there are different views of Dorje Shugden and what those are, but mainly it explains about his practice, his iconography, how people rely upon him, his mandala, his mantra, and so on useful encyclopedic material about the Deity Dorje Shugden. ( ) ::

0false

0.00001

0.000079

''''''''''== REPLY TO ALL THIS SHIT YOUS LOTS HAVE BEEN WRITING: OMG, WHAT LOOSERS THIS IS A KIDS BOOK, FOR KIDS* YOU LOOSERS JUST READ KIDS BOOKS EVERY DAY, YOUVE GOT NOTHING BETTER TO DO THEN GOD HAVE MERCY .................. *(i am a kid) == == ==''''''''''

0false

0.999585

0.201614

P.S. But, tell you what: I collapsed my entire user page and will leave it that way for a few weeks so you don’t have to be so easily exposed to someone who wrote about his son instead of himself. If you want to continue to make hay about it, you can do so on the premise that you know it still sorta-kinda exists and it can still be viewed with only one click by those who like it. (*sound of audience gasp*)

0false

0.000557

0.002028

:::Err, to add to what I said, is http://www.religioustolerance.org/ceintro.htm on the page? It notes that BCE and CE were originally used in Theological writings? How is CE and BCE better than AD and BC in this regard?

0false

0.000012

0.000015

== Wrong coordinates == Wikipedia is my favorite source of information. But there is a mistake in this article: It gives the coordinates of Gran Canaria as 27°58′S 15°36′W. It should say 27°58′ NORTH, 15°36′W. Regards, Bernd Riechelmann briechelx@gmail.com

0false

0.00001

0.000112

. This account is a sock puppet of Dantherocker1

0false

0.000689

0.00001

" :*Exactly, this is not about DC, she is embarking on a solo career leaving DC behind (on hiatus). "

0false

0.00001

" ::Yeah, that's what my original {{clarify}} was really about. So, I've restored the {{clarify}} and added others where Q-IV and Q-I sensitivity is addressed. I understood that Q-IV is the least sensitive and the generic definition of ""less sensitive"" (which is why I edited that from the article) but why Q-IV is the least sensitive (and Q-I is most sensitive) isn't explained in the article."

0false

0.000013

0.000011

" == Lighthouse == I was pointed in the direction to move it to ""Lighthouse"". Feel free to move it back if you feel it is overly appropriate. Thanks, "

0false

0.00001

0.000014

What looks like the Egg Fleet appeared in the trailer. The Egg Fleet debuted in Heroes, and returned in Shadow. It's also possible that it could be the Egg Carrier from Adventure, X, and Nex-Gen.

0false

0.00001

" == Deleted images as ""not screenshots"" == You deleted a number of my image contributions as ""I7: Invalid justification given for non-free image: clearly invalid fair-use tag [Non-free web screenshot]: this is not a screenshot of a Web page"" These are: # Bkell (Talk | contribs) deleted ""Image:EulaliaBourne.gif"" ‎ (I7: Invalid justification given for non-free image: clearly invalid fair-use tag [Non-free web screenshot]: this is not a screenshot of a Web page) # Bkell (Talk | contribs) deleted ""Image:Daniel C. Jackling.gif"" ‎ (I7: Invalid justification given for non-free image: clearly invalid fair-use tag...: this is not a screenshot of a Web page) # Bkell (Talk | contribs) deleted ""Image:Meteor Crater Museumjpeg.jpeg"" ‎ (I7: Invalid justification given for non-free image: clearly invalid fair-use tag...: this is not a screenshot of a Web page) # Bkell (Talk | contribs) deleted ""Image:Jackling House.jpg"" ‎ (I7: Invalid justification given for non-free image: clearly invalid fair-use tag...: this is not a screenshot of a Web page) # Bkell (Talk | contribs) deleted ""Image:Sasco,AZ.jpg"" ‎ (I7: Invalid justification given for non-free image: clearly invalid fair-use tag this is not a screenshot of a Web page) # Bkell (Talk | contribs) deleted ""Image:Meteorite Museum.jpg"" ‎ (I7: Invalid justification given for non-free image: clearly invalid fair-use tag this is not a screenshot of a Web page) # Bkell (Talk | contribs) deleted ""Image:Nininger-portrait.jpg"" ‎ (I7: Invalid justification given for non-free image: clearly invalid fair-use tag this is not a screenshot of a Web page) However, all but one of these seem to fit the WP definition of Screenshot: ""Screenshot: Outputting the entire screen in a common bitmap image format such as BMP, PNG, or JPEG."" See, for example, http://cowpuncher.library.arizona.edu/images/eulalia.gif , which I uploaded as ""Image:EulaliaBourne.gif"" You will note that the entire content of this page is the image I uploaded. Please tell me how this differs from the definition of ""screenshot"" I just quoted from Wikipedia. If you have a preferred copyright tag for historic photos, I'd be happy to substitute that. However, of the menu of choices at Special:Upload this appeared to match closely. I'm certainly making a good-faith effort to comply with the WP fair-use rules, and it seems discourteous to delete the contributions without offering the uploader a chance to reply. TIA for your help in straightening this out "

0false

0.000021

0.001261

FUCK YOU YOU LIKE ANGELIQUE CARRINGTON AND TAMARA HARRINGTON??????FUCK YOU ASSHOLE!!!!!!

1true

0false

1true

0false

1.00001

" == to q5? == Here you said ""to Q5"" but I don't think it got there. While you're at it, ""ace the"" doesn't make sense in :that British airman Tom Rees was killed in the first official victory credited to German flying ace the Red Baron? howzabout either :that British airman Tom Rees was killed in the first official victory credited to the Red Baron? or :that British airman Tom Rees was killed in the first official victory credited to the ""Red Baron""German World War I flying ace Manfred von Richthofen? the latter being what it was before Gatoclass tinkered with it. "

0false

0.000011

0.00005

and you r guy mother fucker

1true

0false

1true

0false

1true

0false

1.00001

0.999979

==Improvement Drive== The article Grameen Bank is currently nominated to be improved on Wikipedia:This week's improvement drive. If you want to support the article, you can vote for it there.

0false

0.000011

Ulu Panah is unknow to me. Must be refered to Ulu Pahang old name of Ulu Muar, that was not divised between Jelebu and Pahang but was absorbed by Johol (its mother state)

0false

0.000176

0.000012

This article was nominated for deletion on June 8, 2005; the consensus was to keep. For discussion, please see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Gilly Salmon.

0false

0.00001

I seem to be jumping into a nest of vipers but, Devanampriya, your position appears to be hyper-nationalist. And, no, I'm not a sock puppet.

0false

0.002603

0.000011

: This *should* have been an apology for your grotesquely inappropriate comment. Instead it is pathetic self-justification. Take it away and re-write it

0false

0.823807

0.00544