comment_text
stringlengths 1
5k
| toxic
class label 2
classes | severe_toxic
class label 2
classes | obscene
class label 2
classes | threat
class label 2
classes | insult
class label 2
classes | identity_hate
class label 2
classes | prediction_hate
float64 0
1
| prediction_nsfw
float64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
== Get a life ==
Witch! Witch!
Sorry, I mean, Sock! Sock!
You seriously need help. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.986006 | 0.000128 |
Për Ilirët jemi marr vesh tani. Mos u brengos për këtë artikull më. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000021 | 0.000044 |
WP:PROD should only be used for an uncontroversial deletion; you will probably need to use the WP:AFD process. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
Census Data Pointed to Nodaway Township in Nodaway County, Missouri
The census data (based on FIPS and GID) added by capitalbot pointed to Nodaway Township in Nodaway County. I can't find the township on the census site. If you want the data from this write it was used on
this version | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000011 | 0.000023 |
"
== Data mart article badly in need of help! ==
I just visited what might be considered a ""sister article"" to this one - the Data mart article. It is badly in need of attention. I figured I'd post a quick note here, since people who are editing this one are more likely to be interested in that one as well (at least more likely to be interested than the general population of editors). Thanks. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
==Dude==
Stop. I'm done. Get over it. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
::What date does it need to be written by? | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
::I understand. I've tried to explain that you can't support a claim about what mainstream economists have said about Austrian economics with a WSJ-article written by people who are not mainstream economists and don't discuss Austrian economics, because the article bears no relation to those claims, but no one has thus far responded to those objections and instead just reverted my edits and made open threats. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000011 | 0.000011 |
"
*Keep Its a clearly defined period in history common to both current countries. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTOMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTOMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF OMFG WTF | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 1.00001 | 1.00001 |
::I agree with the revert as he can't speak for the goverment, nevertheless Khurshid Ahmad is not just one out of 168 million Pakistanis, he is also one out of 100 senators, and vice-president of Jamaat-e-Islami. — | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000024 |
Is this a neologism? I can't find news/media discussing it. Or maybe I'm searching in the wrong spot. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000029 | 0.00001 |
"
==Because They're Young.==
Why no mention of Dick being the lead character in this 1959 ""Blackboard Jungle"" rework movie?
" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000012 |
::::::Yes, I concur. ///WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
== Bobby Cox ==
Hi, I just removed the legal section you readded to the Bobby Cox Article and placed an edited version on the talk page for discuss. I think this info certainly is fair game to include on the page, but it needs to be carefully edited per WP:BLP and some consensus needs to be reached before it is added back.
The first sentence alleging a history of spousal abuse is uncited and MUST be removed per WP:BLP. The next few sentences are OK for the most part but they leave off the fact that the charge was later dropped which seems to me to push a POV - so it needs rewriting. The last sentence doesn't seem to really belong in a article about Bobby Cox and also seems to be POV pushing in my opinion. Perhaps it would be better placed in the MLB article?
My thoughts, please discuss on the talk page as it seems like there are several editors that might have good input. Regards. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000011 | 0.000017 |
==dude you are all bitches. you sit there and police some gay website that can't isn't even viable information because of people like you guys. thanks for making the world a better place. Conche tu madre | 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 0.999902 | 0.000853 |
"
==Your list==
Just wanted to let you know, the D`mt period goes from ca. 800 BC to the 5th/4th c. BC, when the proto-Aksumite period starts. The proto-Aksumite period ends ca. 1st c. BC, when the Aksumite period begins. The date of Aksum's shift to the Zagwe dynasty (which you forgot to include in the medieval list, btw, along with the Solomonic dynasty) isn't known yet, but it may actually be the 12th century, since Anbessa Widim, a king remembered by tradition to have been one of the last late Aksumite kings, is now attested to ca. 1125-1150 (we have a colophon in a Bible written by the Patriarch Abba Mika'el in 1150, which notes that Anbessa Widim was king when he was appointed in 1129), so the 937 date you have is much too precise and probably inaccurate. It's based on the assumption that Gudit's reign was the beginning of the Zagwe dynasty and the end of Aksum, which isn't necessarily the case. Anyway, happy editing. — | (Yom) | • • Ethiopia" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00004 | 0.000099 |
:::You can use https://tools.wmflabs.org/citations-dev/doibot.html or http://tools.wmflabs.org/citations-dev/ until I can investigate this. ( – | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
== James Dignan ==
Hi De Piep - you wrote: Eh, someone put two songs by James Dignan -you know- in this list ;-). Could you check for the right links etc? btw, I trust your information on the existence of these songs. In 1996 I bought different music. Bye, -
:It wasn't me (but I think I can guess who )! I've removed one (it was an instrumental) and disambiguated the other's location, but I wonder whether it should be there at all - it was released on an album, but wasn't exactly a big-seller. ... | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000013 | 0.000038 |
::Thanks for the namecheck and thanks for your work on the file. Yes, Alan, I am interested in the Baynham family, chiefly for its associations with the Denys family of Gloucestershire. The 4th wife of Sir Walter Denys, son and heir of Maurice Denys (c. 1410–1466) of Gloucestershire was Alice Walwyn, who is depicted as one of the two wives of Thomas Baynham (died 1499/1500) on his monument in Micheldean Church. See File:BrassWivesOfThomasBaynhamMicheldean.jpg. Hope that helps. For any further discussion, contact me on my own talk page. ( ) | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000011 | 0.000014 |
== G&W; Annual Meeting ==
See my post on the G&W; talk page. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
:You are such a liar, you added your own reference right here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Galling&diff;=next&oldid;=249721664 on November 5th 2008. Stop pushing your wares here! | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.732948 | 0.001421 |
::How so ? The city authorities are certainly a reliable and notable source and there is nothing suggesting otherwise. What makes you oppose them as not reliable, as opposed to personal diaries, nazi book or ostforschung which you use as sources in various other articles ? | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000014 | 0.000032 |
==Editing for final Contribution==
Overall, good article. However, try incorporating more examples in your article. Try to find more studies to back up the points that you make in the article. However, I don't think any new content/ideas should be added into the article, just more detail on what is already written. The article is already quite long, and if more sections would be added it would just bog down the readers with too much information. Additionally, make sure you cite frequently. The amount of citations is ok, but it wouldn't hurt to cite more frequently.
popekp740 | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000011 | 0.000011 |
"
:See WP:R#NOTBROKEN. ~ (with the !) " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
Personal opinions of people who have no expertise in the field? Are you trying to disqualify the writings of people like Stephen Hassan, Patsy Rahn, Deng and Fang, Maria Chang, Dr. Margaret Singer and the like? I know you don't like their quotes because because they have said critical things about the Falun Gong, but that is no justification for not using their statements. Covenant had proposed a standard for sources which is broad enought to allow the inclusion of material that is needed in this article on both sides of the debate. Before you make any grand claims about sources, I suggest you go back and read the standard proposed by Covenant and think about how his proposed standard would relate to your own material. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00028 | 0.000013 |
"
==Point to Ponder==
Hello Dennis, I'm not sure if you would read my reply on my 'talk' page, so I;m posting it here as well. Hope this is okay. As you can see, I'm not that Wiki-knowledgeable, apart from article-writing, which is probably why I get into trouble for doing all sorts of things I'm not supposed to )
::Thanks for your kind words, Dennis. However, the SPI interested me not at all. I know I'm me, so that's that. No, what has caused me to leave Wikipedia is that I feel I have been bullied, there has also been attempted manipulation and threats of mass deletion of all the articles I created. Is this Wiki policy? I think not. I'm sorry, but I am not prepared to accept that. Life' too short, I don't need it. These were Sudo's parting words to me, relating to the letter above Considering the attitude you've had with me and several other editors, I'm sorry but I'm not even going to read this. Treat people like crap and you'll be ignored, because believe it or not, people don't want to be treated like crap, no matter how ""humor'' (there it broke off). It took me a long time to write that letter - I wanted to try to explain my position. I wonder what Jimbo would think of that response? Not much, I'll warrant. I, too, have been here 6 years (or maybe 8, memory fails with age )). Anyway, I just came back to thank you for your thoughtful post. Best, Andrea " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000105 | 0.000051 |
"
:""you might mention it was all your fault our resolution was amicable."" Smart-arse! LOL " | 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000011 | 0.00001 |
What a shameful attempt by Social Justice Warriors. Not every racist thing thought up by Salon writers deserves a wikipedia page. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.901055 | 0.000016 |
Yes, I concur. Merge per your three good reasons. — ( ) — | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
You've started applying that to some articles about real people which potentially could bring Wikipedia into the law courts (see WP:BLP), which is why I'm stepping in as an administrator. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
Hello Sothenes12,
thank you very much for your supply. It is much appreciated. I will find time tomorrow to fix the issues on my page. I hope it wont be to late...If I need help I will ask you, thanks again for your offer. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"How can it have ""alumni""? It's not a school. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
:Okay, the phrase does exist, but it is not a neologistic term. It is just a phrase used by the media to show that Muslims fear backlash from some event that occured. There's no way to define that.— " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000627 |
Mein lieber Brendel, Ich bin auch deutscher Herkunft. Mein Vater ist Deutsch, meine Mutter aus Spanien. Ich meine die Nazi-Germanisten, nicht die Deutschen. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.999777 | 0.247362 |
I wil Troll you so hard | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.003551 | 0.00001 |
== lamo ==
who are u | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000027 | 0.004457 |
== syrian occupation of lebanon ==
can you take a look at the syrian occupation of lebanon article again? yuber made up an apologist name for the article and now someone named parlmiro is trying to get the name changed back. do you know this editor yuber? | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000013 | 0.000088 |
"
== new pics ==
Just snapped a couple of pics of a rather stout and hardy salamander that I believe is a redback, in case anyone is interested in trying to integrate either into an expanded article:
Cheers! | " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000014 |
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. ]] | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
*Aerosol I guess as no one wishes to use the simpler term mist. · · email) " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00003 | 0.000013 |
== Businessman or spammer? ==
I knew that after leaving a very successful professional football career, Fran Tarkenton set himself up as a businessman and led seminars for other businessmen. Little did I know that one day I would receive an email from him. How did he know my email address? What could a legendary football hero have to say to me? How can I help Fran Tarkenton?
So I hurriedly and expectantly opened the email from this legend of a quarterback and found, to my dismay, typical spam offering me an opportunity to purchase a report that will reveal the hidden information behind seminars. This was not legendary football hero kind of spam; just your everyday, normal, annoying spam sent by a spambot to millions of unwitting email addresses stored on a CD and purchased from a greasy looking fellow in a back alley.
Thank YOU, Fran Tarkenton, for getting my hopes up and knocking them right back down like a linebacker who was just informed of indiscreet sexual relations between his mother and the opposing team's punter.
Thank YOU, Fran Tarkenton, for the offer to buy some truth from you. The world needs less hype and more truth, although the world could do without any more spammers.
Thank YOU, Fran Tarkenton, for helping me differentiate between the hype and truth about Fran Tarkenton. The hype is that you are a legend; the truth is that you are an annoying spammer. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000459 | 0.000632 |
"
::I don't have a choice. RL is fucking with me. I may be gone as soon as early next week. If son, I'll try to leave a message saying so. Sorry to be so elusive, but my time here is nearly done I fear. ǀ " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.189551 | 0.499602 |
::Maybe Galloway should leave Britain and enlist with Hamas? lolololol. They seem like him more than his government does. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000046 | 0.000105 |
"
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
*: This ""illustrating the article"" can't be a justification for uploading porn. There should be a clear policy. Should we allow people to upload child porn to ""illustrate"" (what a joke) what child porn is? And other graphic porn ""illustrating"" bestiality, anal sex, urolagnia, rapes, necrophilia? That's just a nonsensical excuse for allowing people to upload porn. The policy on this should be clearly defined, and all porno pictures should be deleted. I don't see what's the point of this poll anyway. The site owner should define the rules on porn. He has already said this image is completely unacceptable for wikipedia I don't even consider this borderline. That's should be the end of the debate. Someone can always start their own Pornopedia if they disagree. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.030627 | 0.006637 |
"
::No worries. · · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000012 | 0.00001 |
THIS IS TOM YA SOOOO AWESOME LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOOLOLOLOLOL SOOOOOO WAT YOU PEOPLE DOING U STUPID YOU NEVER GUESSS WHERE I BEEN DR ZOID BERG LOL C MAN | 1true
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 1.00001 | 0.787089 |
bill clinton is a hoe!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
::OK. Thanks for thinking it over. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
::re::category:Architecture, it,s just one of those cats where nothing and everything gets dumped, so it's mostly moving many articles in their proper subcategories (e.g. Atrium (architecture) to category:Architectural elements and Architecture of the Teutonic Order[uh? Why was this allowed to even survive??] to category:Architectural history). | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000017 | 0.000475 |
== Moved category ==
Hi. What do you think about this? | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"=Powers===
Having started on Powers ""History As Propaganda"", could I present my POV on his POV -)
First he tries to present himself as an NPOV (aren't we all?), but I get the impression he is quite a strong POV...he is clearly a follower of Tibetan Buddhism having also written ""Introduction to Tibetan Buddhism"", which is fair enough, but IMHO he has selected his sources, then criticises them (fair enough) and presents a synthesis: balanced eh?
But the balance he arrives at, much depends on the choice and presentation of sources, and the weighting given them. In other words Powers has given himself full freedom as to where he will find his balance: and that balance of course just happens to lie inside his comfort space as a believer in TB....
As an example: for Powers presents Goldsteins view of the DL as being a ""devious but inept politician"" who exasperates the Chinese with ""duplicity, intransigence and bungling"". Now Goldstein thinks the DL made strategic mistakes in his relations with the Chinese, but has a much more qualified view, and never uses that sort of language. So Powers has used the ""straw man"" technique by presenting a view and language not used by Goldstein, and attacking that to provide evidence of bias.
==" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000026 | 0.000211 |
"
== A barnstar for you! ==
{| style=""background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;""
|rowspan=""2"" style=""vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;"" |
|style=""font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;"" | The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
|-
|style=""vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;"" | You are a good defender!!!
|}" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000046 | 0.000049 |
;;And please, lave Direct3D and OpenGL out of it that may be where most people will encounter them, but that's not the only thing to shaders and most definetly not the origin of shaders. Feel free to write what you think is best, and have a look at some of the early versions, which are a lot better written than the current one, has more information and less specifics to OpenGL and (in particular) Direct3D. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000013 |
The reference in the article to the effect that she denies working for the CIA is inaccurate. The source cited clearly says that she denies that she continues to work for the CIA. Years earlier, she is on record in the New York Times and elsewhere as someone who is proud of her work for the CIA. See NYT for 1967-02-21, as shown [here]. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000046 | 0.000083 |
==Bronx entries==
Thanks for your comments. Would appreciate some clarification re film section. (Am concerned that the Bronx is all too often presented as a disease.) + I'm new to this realm. 00.20, 13 July 2008 (UTC) | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
*:::Firstly, in my opinion the consensus from that discussion is far from clear (Nilfanion seemed to strongly disagree) and it was a long time ago. Personally I also don't like consensuses formed by a wikiproject without wider input (e.g. an RfC) as I think the participants are normally too closely involved, although I am aware that many don't share my view on this. Personally I'd give your argument some weight but not too much for the reasons I outline but I'm but one moderately experienced editor and we'll see what the closing admin thinks. Thanks again for pointing me at relevant discussion, as before your explanation this was starting to feel like a whole of bunch of ""ILIKEIT"" votes. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000015 | 0.000024 |
====request for conclusion deletion====
A conclusion seems very out of place in a Wikipedia article. Perhaps it would be best to delete said conclusion. Not only is it vague, e.g. it states that To some[who?], what is most fascinating about the way our understanding has shifted is that neuro-anatomical evidence now offers support for Freud’s theory of dream interpretation, but moreover, an article which must be as objective as possible does not require a conclusion, which is best used when following a thesis that the author defends. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000013 |
"
:I just did some AR's edits on MusicBrainz for the System 7 artist entry there. On the vinyls I own, the credits are always written as ""The Orb"" (example for A cool dry place, track 2 of the 777 album: Produced by Steve Hillage & The Orb ... Mixed by The Orb). " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000022 |
"
::Actually there's nothing wrong with mentioning what you bring up right now. We currently state, ""On some days his television program draws upwards of 3 million viewers,"" but there's nothing wrong with changing that to the average and saying he has the highest rate dcable show in that time slot, assuming that's true and reliably sourced. As far as I'm concerned you could add that right now if you want. | | " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000026 | 0.000023 |
== TWL Questia check-in ==
Hello!
You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:
*Make sure that you can still log in to your Questia account; if you are having trouble feel free to get in touch.
*When your account expires you can reapply for access at WP:Questia.
*Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed.
*Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, email us and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.
Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer.
Thanks!
Delivered by , on behalf of | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000046 | 0.000698 |
"
:There are news reports claiming that Bell boasted of making sarin and had a precursor. There are some BLP issues to consider before believing them. The second source is rather vague about it, and I suspect it may simply be based on the first. The first (The Columbian) says that investigators said that two friends said that Bell said that he had made sarin. Now the precursor chemical named in the story, diisopropyl fluorophosphate, is not listed by Wikipedia in our sarin synthesis recipe...
:The question we get into, in terms of WP:BLP, is whether ""the allegations are presented as true"". I would guess that in this case, perhaps not. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000013 | 0.000018 |
"
:You should really sign your comments with four tildes, as specified (either by typing it or clicking the ""signature"" button above the edit window) - Wikipedia automatically expands that into a full, timestamped signature that links back to your user page and user talk page. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000041 |
""" may also refer to rote learning.
Mugging is a type of theft, in which the perpetrator (the mugger) accosts the victim in a public place, such as a sidewalk, street or parking lot, and demands money and/or valuables through the use of force or fear. The thief will typically threaten to use a weapon such as a gun or knife.
==The crime of mugging and its history==
The term 'mugging' gained its current popularity in the United States, with New York infamously described in the 1970s as 'the mugging capital of America'. However, the crime is as old as history and among other things has been known as highway robbery, purse-snatching, or footpadding (which could be surreptitious or violent). In Victorian times the targets were wallets and gold watches, but in the US there was a big increase in reported street robberies and handbag snatches from the 1960s onwards as new consumer items became popular. In England the fashion for mugging either arose or gained popularity through many social factors in the late seventies and eighties, and became a cultural phenomenon among some urban youths. In some cultures, there was perceived to be a growing tendency for young males to steal from other young males. The principal targets became valuable and popular accessories like portable audio devices, cameras, laptop computers, mobile phones, and other items that can be quickly and easily resold. Excitement, status, and gang initiation are undoubtedly important motives too. In larger United States cities and in the United Kingdom, the news media report and cover muggings as a crime trend, and some observers blamed the news media for a moral panic in England from the early 1970s at a time when “newspaper reporting of mugging(s) emerged and became increasingly sensational”Hale, D. (1998). Popular Culture, Crime and Justice. Wadsworth Publishing Company, California. Nonetheless, as recorded crime statistics, insurance claims, and national crime surveys all show, street robberies remained a growing problem until they peaked at about the turn of the millennium.
Such robberies can involve the threat and/or use of weapons and/or violence. Most mugging victims are uninjured or suffer minor injuries. However, in some cases victims die from heart attack or stroke when they struggle with assailants, through falling from moving buses or under vehicles, being knocked to the ground and hitting their heads on the sidewalk, being stabbed with edged weapons or shot with firearms, or beaten with blunt force. More frequently than death, mugging victims sustain lifetime dermatological scarring, facial, cranial, and maxillofacial trauma as well as orthopedic injuries which affect some level of disability, and impact labor and life activities.
==Risk factors for victimization==
* Conspicuous display by sidewalk pedestrians of resellable consumer items or indications thereof such as white iPod headphones.
* Preoccupation of sidewalk pedestrians by certain activities such as talking on a mobile phone. This activity is seen as a particular risk factor because the victim is distracted by the conversation, typically has compromised hearing and peripheral vision, and is conspicuously displaying a resellable item that can be quickly and easily converted to cash.
==Mugger Modus Operandi==
Some muggers operate alone. Others work sidewalks as a group of assailants, that many refer to as a wolf-pack due to the similarities to canine behavior and hunting technique. The wolf-pack technique serves multiple purposes. At the moment of the incident the presence of multiple assailants first deters a solo victim from physically retaliating. Several wolf-pack muggers dressed substantially similar can confuse a victim from making proper suspect identification at a police lineup if the perpetrators are arrested. Following the incident, several wolf-pack muggers dressed substantially similar can also split up stolen merchandise and travel in different directions following their crimes to avoid police identification and arrest.
In many United States cities, muggers wear disguises integrated into clothing and accessories, such as hooded sweatshirts or hoodies. Others wear gradient lens glasses or stunner shades as a nighttime fashion accessory. Caps, and hats also serve as a change of disguise. As of 2006 and 2007, ski masks and balaclavas are making a comeback as a popular fashion accessory in some circles.
As a basic operations technique, muggers attempt to blend into their surroundings as much as possible to avoid police detection following their crimes. To this extent many wear the local clothing style de-jour. To the extent to which most other persons in their age group wear jeans, the | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000049 | 0.000264 |
am sorry for being a dickhead! I cannae help it, I am a douche bag and a dumbass bitch boy. PLEASE! I would like to change from being such a lifeless loser! | 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 1.000002 | 0.980077 |
get off wikepidia you dorks and get on myspace to talk to me! | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.005452 | 0.000188 |
could have potentially replaced | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
==Theft/Fraud==
There's a story here about $500k worth of BTC being stolen, I won't add it in as it's very possibly a troll but if there's any more reliable coverage of this angle it should definitely go in the concerns section. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000012 | 0.000174 |
== A note of thanks ==
Before departing, I would like to thank you for your efforts to put some balance into what is basically an attack page. My (brief) experience on Wikipedia has confirmed the fact that it's a time-sink and there are a lot of fucking idiots who will type any bullshit into it, then play their little games to make sure their shit stinks. As long as retards like that NeilN twat abound here, it's a foregone conclusion that facts will always take a backseat to smear and lies. Given all that, there's NO FLOCKING WAY I will bother getting an account; this has been a very bad experience for the most part. The small part that hasn't been bad was seeing you standing up for the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law, and not to let trial by media become the standard of justice in this country. Best wishes and have a good life. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.544928 | 0.231808 |
==Sources==
Real Time Arts interview | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
:Your efforts to improve the article are appreciated, but please take note of a few things: 1) despite your reference to the ""needs additional citations for verification,"" you provide no citations. 2) The content you continuously add is a run-on sentence, with almost every word unnecessarily linked to another Wikipedia article (please see WP:Style). 3) Your content is confusing and technical, especially for the leading paragraph of an articlewhich is intended to provide a basic overview and simple information. Your edits have been reverted by multiple editors, and your continued efforts to revert the article back to the form you prefer is a violation of Wikipedia's three revert rule. Bearing this in mind, please feel free to integrate your content into the rest of the article within the framework of the style manual and requirement of reliable sources. Please do not revert the article back to the content that you prefer (again, see the three revert rule); Wikipedia decision-making is based on consensus. Thank you again for your efforts to improve the article. – · " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000027 | 0.00009 |
== Sockpuppetry ==
==Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts== | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000011 |
:No problem. I just wasn't certain if it was the exact same editor. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
I replaced the Japanese demonstration image. The reasons are
*It is unknown that it was staged by Ganbare Nippon from the previous image. The name of Ganbare Nippon/頑張れ日本 can be clearly seen in the new image.
*The Oct. 2, 2010 demonstration was the most notable demo and reported by major media in the world. But not the 2012 demonstration.
*The new image is 100% copyright free. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
== Richard Pitino ==
Richard Pitino is Rick Pitino son and FIU's head coach. Welcome to Wikipedia. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000919 | 0.000011 |
REDIRECT Talk:Catherine Woodville, Duchess of Buckingham | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
NIGEL IS A CRAZY IDIOT!!! | 1true
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 0.084518 | 0.000012 |
:Actually you had a third option: Show that the spherical harmonics are actual eigenfunctions of the Hermitian operators L2 and L2. Since this is just checking that solutions of a PDE are solutions it is just elementary calculus. Their orthonamility is then a trivial consequence. ( ) | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000158 | 0.000113 |
"
== number of sources ==
43 of the 48 citations come from just two sources. Since Ms. Kennedy never held office, had no role in, and made no contribution to, society, this article should be trimmed significantly. The article itself is warranted; the length is not. Thousands of people have been presented at court, but they do not all get a Wikipedia article. Was Rosemary Kennedy important in any way - besides being a sibling to other famous people?
The last section, titled ""Mental Condition,"" is especially troubling. It is from one source titled ""Sins of the Father,"" which is a dead giveaway to bias. The use of words like disgrace, failure, banished, rejection, along with references to Mr. Kennedy's alleged mistress, all seems like an attack on the family. The last section is also a blatant promotion of an author, Ronald Kessler - who is mentioned by name six times. The sentence ""Kessler conducted the only interview with Watts before he died,"" is completely irrelevant; it sounds like the whole thing was written by Kessler himself.
A dispassionate review of the entire article is necessary. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000064 | 0.000082 |
== Dave Grohl ==
How do you know that dave went to Annandale High School? He was also a drop out | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000062 | 0.00025 |
:I read it as the parenthetical clause within the first sentence being cited to that other source, and the rest of the sentence being cited to the church's website. Why we have written the lead with such a long parenthetical escapes me; that just cries out for copyediting. So does the whole article, but... I think the claim is accurately footnoted. The first sentence of the next section says he did his graduate studies in Scotland, and is cited to a pair of books. The Worldnetdaily article used in our article says the studies in Scotland were interrupted by the return to Kenya - but it could be interrupted after a masters and before a doctorate or it could be before either, impossible to tell. Frankly, I think if we just clean up the parenthetical comment, the sourcing will become clearer, and the material to my eyes generally satisfies WP:SELFPUB, but I'm not certain it passes the relevance part of the test. I've reviewed a bunch of our articles on prominent religious leaders, including both those widely respected (the current Pope, Billy Graham) and those best known for scandals (Bakker, Roberts) and none mentioned a degree in the introduction. Some don't mention degrees at all, some mention them in a subsection about early life or education. This fits with my general knowledge of the religious field; degrees are not of great importance to a minister. They may or may not equip him or her for the work, but they are mostly irrelevant to their current and potential congregants. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000015 | 0.000062 |
== Clojure ==
Example with (or ...) isn't correct:
(or nil false 1)
will get 1 instead of false | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000011 | 0.000011 |
"
== Star Trek canon vs. Star Trek canon ==
OK, this is getting silly. It's an incredibly trivial edit to get into an edit war over, so let's be civilized.
Here's what the Wikipedia guide to writing better articles has to say about the principle of least astonishment:
:===Principle of least astonishment===
:Using the principle of least astonishment, you should plan your pages and links so that everything appears reasonable and makes sense. If a link takes readers to somewhere other than where they thought it would, it should at least take them someplace that makes sense.
:====Example====
:A user wants to know about the nuclear power plant that exploded in Chernobyl. The page on ""Chernobyl"" redirects to ""Chornobyl"", an alternative spelling for that town. However, the user sees that a link to the desired page, Chernobyl accident, is placed prominently near the top of the Chornobyl page, and happily clicks on that.
It's true that an editor who saw a link saying Star Trek canon might subsequently type a link as [[''Star Trek'' canon]]. However, such an editor would quickly realize their mistake, just as E. Pluribus Anthony did within two minutes. It's Wikipedia style to italicize titles of television series, so the link should say Star Trek canon, even though the article is (rightly) at Star Trek canon. I don't see what's wrong with using the piped link here. — " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000015 | 0.000035 |
":::::::Actually I might have got that wrong when trying to locate the position it was taken. If it does show the crash site in the photo, do restore it.
" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"BTW ""Abrahamic tradition "" is not vague at all: it's Judaism + Christianity + Islam. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
:: It's unfortunate that more people did not offer their opinion to the report, but I had to publish with what I had. As a member of the wikiproject, you were welcome to contribute also. I don't have huge amounts of time at the moment to do thorough investigations, so the quality of the reports may vary. I only apologise for not representing WikiProject Death better. @ " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000026 |
سوال ۱۰
سوال ۱۰ ۔ کیا اُم المومنین حضرت عائشہؓ کا مولاعلیؑ کے مقابل خروج حق تھا؟
مستند روایات سے پتہ چلتا ہے کہ مولا علیؑ اور حضرت عائشہؓ کے مابین مخاصمت واقعہ افک کے بعد سے ہی شروع ہوگئی تھی جو کہ بڑھتے بڑھتے عداوت اختیار کہ گئی۔ دورانِ واقعہ افک حضوراکرمؐ نے غمغین حالت میں مولا علی ؑ سے مشورہ کیا تو مولا نے آپ کو غم و اضطراب سے بچانے کے لئے یہ مشورہ دیا کہ اللہ تعالیٰ نے آپ پر کچھ تنگی نہیں فرمائی اگر افواہوں کی بنا پر عائشہؓ کی طرف سے کچھ تکرر طبعی ہو گیا ہے تو عورتیں اور بہت ہیں۔ علاوہ ازیں آپ کا یہ تکرار اس طرح بھی رفع ہو سکتا ہے کہ بریرہؓ جو صدیقہ عائشہؓ کی کنیز ہیں۔ اُن سے اُنکے حالات کی تحقیق فرما لیجئے‘‘۔ مولا علیؑ کے اس مشورہ کا حضرت عائشہؓ کو بھی پتہ چل گیا تھا جس کی وجہ سے صدیقہ دِلی طور پر مولا ؑ سے ناخوش تھیں۔
ہادی برحقؐ کی رحلت کے بعد مولا علی ؑ نے چھ ما ہ تک خلیفہ اول سے بیعت نہ کی۔ اِس دوران مسئلہ فدک بھی پیش آیا جس میں حضرت عائشہؓ نے سیدہ فاطمہؓ اور مولا علی ؑ کا بھی ساتھ نہ دیا اور اپنے والد حضرت ابو بکرؓ کی روایت کردہ حدیث کی تصدیق بھی کی۔مجھے مفتی صاحب کی اس بات سے قطعی طور پر اختلاف ہے کہ خلیفہ اول کے دور حکومت میں مولا علیؑ کے گھر کو آگ لگانے کے لئے کھڑیاں اس لئے جمع کی گئیں تھیں کیونکہ گھر میں منافقین اور فسادی جمع ہوگئے تھے۔
سبحان اللہ مفتی صاحب ایک طرف آپ فرما رہے ہیں کہ حضرت عائشہ کے گھر اہل بیت رسولؐ بھی بلا اذن داخل نہیں ہو سکتے تھے دوسری طرف آپ مولا علی ؑ کے گھر میں منافقین جمع ہونے کی خبر دے ر ہے ہیں۔ آپ کا یہ بیان کیا متضاد نہیں؟ کیا مولا کا گھر اہل بیت رسولؐ نہیں تھا؟ اپنی اس غلط بیانی پر ذرا خودی غور فرمائیے۔ نیز جن کو آپ مولا علی کے گھر میں منافقین اور فسادی کہہ رہے ہیں ان میں چند صحابہ کرام مثلاً حضرت عباسؓ بن عبد المطلب، حضرت زبیرؓ ،حضرت طلحہٰ، حضرت مقدارؓ ، حضرت سعد بن ابی وقاص اور خود مولا علیؑ بھی شامل تھے۔ نیز سیدہ فاطمۃ الزھرہؓ و حضرت حسنین ؑ بھی گھر میں موجود تھے ۔ لہٰذہ کیا مولا ؑ کے گھر کو آگ لگانے والے ارباب اختیا ر حضور اکرمؐ کی وصیت بھی بھول چکے تھے جس میں صحابہ کرام ؓ کو تلقین کی گئی تھی کہ میرے شہزادوں کا احترام ، محبت اور تعظیم کرنا۔
ان سب واقعات کے وقوع پذیر ہونے کے باوجود یہ سوال اٹھتا ہے کہ کیا مولا علیؑ اتنے بے بس اور لاچار تھے کہ لوگ ان کے گھر کو آگ لگانے کا پروگرام بنا رہے ہوں اور مولا ؑ خاموش ہیں؟ جواب میں عرض ہے کہ مولاؑ نہ تو خوفزدہ اور نہ ہی لاچار تھے۔ بھلا یہ کیسے ممکن ہے کہ جنگ اخزاب اور جنگ خیبر کا فاتح ایسے موقع پر خوفزدہ ہو۔ اصل بات مولا ؑ کی دور اندیش اور حضور اکرم ؐ کی آخری لمحات میں مولا ؑ کی گود میں وصیت تھی ’’علی میرے بعد تجھے مکر و ہات سے پالا پڑے گا تو دل تنگ نہ کرنا اورصبر کرنا‘‘حضورؐ کی یہ وصیت مولا کے لئے پتھر پر لکیر تھی پھر بھلا صبر کا دامن کیسے چھوڑ دیتے!
لکھنے والوں نے تو بہت کچھ لکھا ہے بلکہ لکھوایا گیا ہے۔ لیکن مولا ؑ چونکہ علم دھبی جو اللہ تعالیٰ کی طرف سے حضور اکرمؐ کے توسط سے ودیعت ہوا تھا سے بہتر طور پر سمجھ سکتے تھے کہ مناسب کیا ہے اورکیا نا مناسب ہے ۔ یہی وجہ تھی کہ مولا ؑ نے خلیفہ اول سے خلیفہ ثالث تک پورا پورا تعاون کیا۔
اب ہم آتے ہیں اصل سوال کی طرف کہ کیا اُم المومنین حضرت عائشہؓ کا مولا علیؓ کے مقابل خروج حق پر مبنی تھا؟
اس سوال کا جواب بہت تفصیل طلب ہے۔ مختصراً عرض کردوں کہ ماں جی تمام امھات المومنین سے زیادہ علم رکھتی تھیں۔ آپ نے قرآن پاک کی مندرجہ ذیل آیات بھی یقناًپڑھی ہونگی:۔
۱:۔ سورۃ الاحزاب (آیت ۶)۔ ترجمہ: نبیؐ مومنوں کے ساتھ خود ان کے نفس سے بھی زیادہ تعلق رکھتے ہیں۔ اور آپؐ کی بی بیاں ان کی ما یں ہیں۔
۲:۔ سورۃ الاحزاب (آیت ۳۱-۳۲)۔ ترجمہ: ۳۱ اے نبی کی بی بیو تم معمولی عورتوں کی طرح نہیں اگر تم تقویٰ اختیار کرو۔ ۳۲: اور تم اپنے گھروں میں قرار سے رہو۔
مذکورہ بالا احکام کی روشنی میں ممکن ہے حضرت عائشہؓ نے صحابہ کو تلقین کی ہو لیکن زیادہ احتمال یہی ہے کہ دیرنہ عدوات جو کہ انسانی فطرت ہے اورمشیروں کے غلط مشوروں سے خروج ہوا۔ ماں جی کو یقین تھا کہ مولا ؑ قاتلانِ عثمان میں شامل نہیں ہیں بلکہ مولا علیؑ نے آخری دم تک ؟؟؟؟ اپنے شہزادوں کے حضرت عثمانؓ کا ساتھ دیا۔ حضرت عائشہؓ ایک عالمہ فا ضلہ ام المومنین تھیں ایک عرصہ حضور اکرمؐ کر قربت میں گزارہ تھا اور اس پر فخر بھی کیا کرتی تھیں۔
آپکے علم میں یہ دو حدیثیں تو ضرور ہونگی جن کا مفہوم یہ ہے:۔
۱: اے علی میرے بعد تمہارے ساتھ یہ اُمت دعا کرے گی تم میری ملت پر زندہ رہو گے۔ (کنز العمال علی متقی الجز سادس ۱۰۷۲)
۲: اے عائشہؓ میرے بعد تم ایک گروہ کی قیادت کرو گی جو نا حق ہو گا۔ مقام خواب پر تمہاری اونٹنی پر کتے بھونکیں گے۔
۳: حضرت عمار بن یاسر کو ایک باغی گروہ قتل کرے گا۔
اتنی واضح احادیث ہوتے ہوئے بھی مولا علیؑ کے خلاف خروج چہ معنی دارد۔ پھر مولاؑ بھی وہ جن کی شان شیخ سعدیؒ نے فرمایا۔
بعدازمصطفےٰ در کل عالم نہ بُد فاضل ترو بہتر ز حیدر ؑ
بہر حال ماں جی نے خروج جن حالات اورجس وجہ سے کیا ظاہری تو ایک فطری عداوت ہی لگتی ہے۔ ورنہ مائیں تو اولاد کو صُلح و امن کا ہی مشورہ دیتی ہیں البتہ انکے خروج سے نہ صرف جنگ جمل ظہور پذیر ہوئی بلکہ جنگِ صفین، واقعہ حُرہ، سانحہٰ کربلا اور نہ جانے کتنے فتنے برپا ہوئے اور ہوتے رہیں گے۔یقیناً ماں جی کو اس حدیث مبارکہ کا بھی علم ہوگا جس میں حضور اکرمؐ نے فرمایا ’’عنقریب میرے اہل بیت میرے بعد میری اُمت سے قتل و غارت دیکھیں گے اور ہمارے سب سے زیادہ بغض رکھنے والے دشمن بنو اُمیہ، بنو المغیرہ و بنو مخدوم ہونگے (حدیث صحیح بخاری باب الفتن نمبر ۷)۔ ‘‘
مندرجہ ذیل چیدہ چیدہ واقعات عالم اسلام میں بد ن | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.438991 | 0.491059 |
"Slim Thug is the ""big boss of the north"", not the south. In the lyrics to Still Tippin' he says ""I got it made, the big boss of the north; ain't shit change, I still represent Swishahouse"". " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.898129 | 0.004942 |
Will do. However, I'm in the middle of several other projects at the moment as well as finals, so it will have to wait until the holidays, if that is ok. | | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000011 | 0.000019 |
"
::::::Fixed I think. Replaced ""entered airspace"" with ""attacked objectives"". " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
*Strong Oppose Why not rename ""sexual intercourse"" to ""fucking""? In all but scientific jargon, ""sexual intercourse"" is very rarely used.
::One good reason is because our guidelines ask that we not do that. From WP:COMMONNAME: ""Article titles should be neither vulgar nor pedantic."" " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000012 | 0.000023 |
"
::::If you said ""Currently, there are stupid people,"" I would not see that as a PA. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.610453 | 0.000012 |
I came hear to learn the same thing. I think on this one you really need to provide an explanation as a part of the close. Thanks! | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
To reply on what Frank Close actually says:
;Extracts from Chapter 9, The Infinity Puzzle, 2013. Relevant snips underlined, rest is to add context
* Although several people discovered the mechanism whereby vector gauge bosons can acquire mass, Brout and Englert being the first to publish a relativistic demonstration, only Higgs drew attention to the consequential existence of a massive scalar particle, which now bears his name.
* By the late summer of 1964 they [Guralnik and Hagen] had ""pretty much everything but still had concerns over some fine details."" His former mentor Walter Gilbert was lecturing at a summer school at Lake Como, so Guralnik made a special trip to tell him what they had achieved.... At the very time when Guralnik was talking with Gilbert, Higgs’s paper was already in production. This would become apparent only later...
* Unaware of this even more precious jewel that lay just out of their reach, Guralnik and Hagen drafted a manuscript, and showed it to Kibble, asking for any additional input. Fate was about to deal them a cruel blow. During 1964 Britain had had a series of postal strikes, which had delayed the mail. Their memory of events, as described in several accounts,[29] is that as they were about to send the final version of their manuscript to PRL, Kibble came in and announced that in the backlog of mail were ""three papers, one by Robert Brout and François Englert... and two by Peter Higgs."" All three also seemed to have discovered how a gauge boson could become massive.
* Guralnik, Hagen, and Kibble’s work was tightly argued and contained unique insights toward understanding the depth of these new ideas. However, the sad fact was that they had been scooped. They added references to those papers into the text but changed nothing, nor did they add anything as a result of what had happened. They sent the manuscript to Physical Review Letters, where it was received on October 12, 1964.... By that oversight, they had implicitly placed themselves as runners-up...
* Gerald Guralnik was one of those who approached the finishing line early but failed to publish fast enough.
* In another of the coincidences in this tale, the editor of PRL received Higgs’s manuscript on the very same day that Brout and Englert’s paper was published. When Higgs’s paper finally appeared in print, on October 19, Brout and Englert were surprised to see that it included a reference to their own: ""He couldn’t have seen our paper, so how did he know of it?"" Higgs explained: Nambu had been the referee of both papers and ""had drawn attention to the work of Brout and Englert. I added a remark about their work."" Their researches were truly independent; in 1964 manuscripts were typed and then submitted by the regular mail. [...] There is no dispute that Brout and Englert were first to complete and first to publish. So why is it that Higgs’s name is associated with the massive boson and not those of Englert or Brout? The answer is that so far everyone has been addressing what happened to Goldstone’s massless boson. However, there remains the issue of Goldstone’s other boson—the massive one. This is what Higgs had uniquely included in his revised paper, the one that appeared in PRL. Two years later, he developed the ideas in a longer paper, setting in motion the events that would make his name.
* So it was that Brout, Englert, and Higgs had all published papers, while GHK were writing their own paper, ignorant of developments due to the British postal strike until the fateful moment when Kibble announced the news.
* Tom Kibble recalled: ""As a matter of fact [in 1964] the Higgs Boson was not seen by anyone as a particularly important feature. The interest [then] was in the way the gauge vector bosons acquired a mass, eating up the Goldstone [massless] Boson on the way. Now of course it’s important because... its observation would confirm the validity of the theory."" ... Kibble’s perception of the perceived unimportance historically is in accord with the memories of others, which were aired when the six shared the Sakurai Prize in 2010. For Englert and Brout, ""This was our first paper in field theory and we were somewhat isolated. We didn’t know about Glashow’s work [on the SU2 × U1 model of the weak and electromagnetic forces] at all.""
* During the International Conference on High Energy Physics at Berkeley in 1966, Ben Lee prominently referred to the “Higgs Boson” and the “Higgs Mechanism.” ... As the GHK team, including Hagen, had not completed their paper until after the appearance of Higgs’s original papers, and as Higgs had built on this further during 1966, with a study of how | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000058 | 0.000175 |
soory Pal
I don't know who you are. You didn't sign. You need to validate to me what POV push, is cause I bet you have one too! | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.002622 | 0.000022 |
"
:::::I agree completely with Arnoutf. Factor, you seem to be here with an axe to grind: we don't need to rejig the article to highlight the wickedness of Hitler or the crimes committed by Germany (and Germans) as you are proposing given that this comes through strongly from providing a ""flat"" history of the war.
::::::No, I am not here to grind an axe; I'm here to try and provide a more accurate picture of the events; and your constant dismissal of my suggestions using the ""neutrality"" excuse is starting to lose validity, as I continually provide facts that weaken your arguments. I'm basing my ideas of how an article of such magnitude should be presented using the WORLD WAR 1 page as a benchmark. In it, you will find a section called Genocide and ethnic cleansing. Imagine that! A section called ""genocide"" Why the heck do you not have a stronger emphasis like that on the WORLD WAR 2 page, where they were murdering people on an industrial scale! The issue here is more than a paragraph about the Poles or the Soviets… it is that you as a ""moderator"" make every effort possible to water down the brutal truth behind the WWII conflict. In fact, I still would like you to comment on my reply regarding the German Election issue, where I challenge your misinformed statement about the nature of the German electorate, and their support for Hitler. The WWII article needs to highlight the following point:
::::::*German Elections of 1932, where Hitler received substantial support (if not a complete majority) from the German voters
::::::*Renaming the ""Concentration camps and slave work"" section to ""The Holocaust, concentration camps and slave labor""
::::::*Include a short paragraph about the German SS atrocities in Poland, and USSR; including examples of specific operations
::::::I do not think that those requests will somehow alter the neutrality of the article as these events happened; and they happened on a massive scale. For example the German SS had over a 1,200,00 paramilitary troops, and their impact on the conduct of the war can not be understated. Yet, is there any real mention of their activities and objectives? The answer is… NO! " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000313 | 0.000199 |
"
: But ... the approximate dates aren't exact and are actually contradicted in the text - we're better off giving the context than misleading folks with the parentheticals. The timeline is subject to the same issue - it makes things look neat and tidy when they aren't. And the sentence which you added about Pirenne is unsourced - this is a FA ... everything is sourced. You added it in before a sentence sourced to Mommsen's ""Petrarch's Conception of the Dark Ages"" - but nothing in Mommsen's article discusses what you added at all. - " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000046 |
Neopets screenshot
You seem to have a dynamic IP. I had left you a note at , which apparently you didn't recieve. I hope you get this, since there is no other way for me to send you this message. Please don't remove the screenshot (if you disagree, please post on Talk:Neopets first), and thank you! | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000023 | 0.000025 |
== Abkhazia AfD==
Thanks for the heads up. 22:25, 1 October 2009 | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
Subsets and Splits