Datasets:

mteb
/

arena-results

@@ -23,3 +23,9 @@
 {"tstamp": 1722264568.9141, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722264568.7644, "finish": 1722264568.9141, "ip": "", "conv_id": "7f9f2445c9024cfb9102de9082b8e1d7", "model_name": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "prompt": "Could the matrix be real?", "output": [["Could the matrix be real?", "Scifi Stackexchange\n\nQ: How did Neo know that the \"reality\" Morpheus told him was the real world was not actually just another simulated reality? How did Neo know that the \"reality\" Morpheus told him was the real world was not actually just another simulated reality? I mean if he believed Morpheus' explanation on simulation isnt it logical for him to assume that the real world was also simulated. Wouldnt it be the perfect prison designed by the machines. Design the prison world and a world for those who think they have escaped.\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}
 {"tstamp": 1722264631.4825, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722264631.3198, "finish": 1722264631.4825, "ip": "", "conv_id": "b7266e33d0cb41e4b60041c6ddcfbfd3", "model_name": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "prompt": "Why Did the Machines Even Bother With a Matrix?", "output": [["Why Did the Machines Even Bother With a Matrix?", "Scifi Stackexchange\n\nQ: Why use full brained humans as batteries? \nPossible Duplicate:\nIs the basic premise of humans as a power source in The Matrix reasonable?\nWhy Did the Machines Even Bother With a Matrix? \n\nThe machines in The Matrix series use humans as batteries. That's OK. But why did the machines not alter their livestock such that the matrix itself would be unnecessary?  \nConsider the recently proposed headless chicken farm. Something similar for the human batteries would seem to be an ideal solution for logical machines. No longer would they need to spend resources maintaining a virtual reality for their batteries. The energy, physical hardware and programs running the matrix could then be put to who knows what other uses.\n\nA: The explanation for the use of human brains would seem to be the fact that our complex thoughts lead to higher level of brain activity, thus resulting in exponentially more synapses firing (i.e. more electrical activity to harvest).\nThat makes human brains far more efficient than the brains of animals, even with the overhead of maintaining the matrix.  Plus, that movie would have really sucked... dumb cows and chickens revolt against the machines!  ;)\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}
 {"tstamp": 1722264631.6779, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722264631.5192, "finish": 1722264631.6779, "ip": "", "conv_id": "048949c86e1d40d2994ef35fc63d4eda", "model_name": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "prompt": "Why Did the Machines Even Bother With a Matrix?", "output": [["Why Did the Machines Even Bother With a Matrix?", "Scifi Stackexchange\n\nQ: Why use full brained humans as batteries? \nPossible Duplicate:\nIs the basic premise of humans as a power source in The Matrix reasonable?\nWhy Did the Machines Even Bother With a Matrix? \n\nThe machines in The Matrix series use humans as batteries. That's OK. But why did the machines not alter their livestock such that the matrix itself would be unnecessary?  \nConsider the recently proposed headless chicken farm. Something similar for the human batteries would seem to be an ideal solution for logical machines. No longer would they need to spend resources maintaining a virtual reality for their batteries. The energy, physical hardware and programs running the matrix could then be put to who knows what other uses.\n\nA: The explanation for the use of human brains would seem to be the fact that our complex thoughts lead to higher level of brain activity, thus resulting in exponentially more synapses firing (i.e. more electrical activity to harvest).\nThat makes human brains far more efficient than the brains of animals, even with the overhead of maintaining the matrix.  Plus, that movie would have really sucked... dumb cows and chickens revolt against the machines!  ;)\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}

 {"tstamp": 1722264568.9141, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722264568.7644, "finish": 1722264568.9141, "ip": "", "conv_id": "7f9f2445c9024cfb9102de9082b8e1d7", "model_name": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "prompt": "Could the matrix be real?", "output": [["Could the matrix be real?", "Scifi Stackexchange\n\nQ: How did Neo know that the \"reality\" Morpheus told him was the real world was not actually just another simulated reality? How did Neo know that the \"reality\" Morpheus told him was the real world was not actually just another simulated reality? I mean if he believed Morpheus' explanation on simulation isnt it logical for him to assume that the real world was also simulated. Wouldnt it be the perfect prison designed by the machines. Design the prison world and a world for those who think they have escaped.\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}
 {"tstamp": 1722264631.4825, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722264631.3198, "finish": 1722264631.4825, "ip": "", "conv_id": "b7266e33d0cb41e4b60041c6ddcfbfd3", "model_name": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "prompt": "Why Did the Machines Even Bother With a Matrix?", "output": [["Why Did the Machines Even Bother With a Matrix?", "Scifi Stackexchange\n\nQ: Why use full brained humans as batteries? \nPossible Duplicate:\nIs the basic premise of humans as a power source in The Matrix reasonable?\nWhy Did the Machines Even Bother With a Matrix? \n\nThe machines in The Matrix series use humans as batteries. That's OK. But why did the machines not alter their livestock such that the matrix itself would be unnecessary?  \nConsider the recently proposed headless chicken farm. Something similar for the human batteries would seem to be an ideal solution for logical machines. No longer would they need to spend resources maintaining a virtual reality for their batteries. The energy, physical hardware and programs running the matrix could then be put to who knows what other uses.\n\nA: The explanation for the use of human brains would seem to be the fact that our complex thoughts lead to higher level of brain activity, thus resulting in exponentially more synapses firing (i.e. more electrical activity to harvest).\nThat makes human brains far more efficient than the brains of animals, even with the overhead of maintaining the matrix.  Plus, that movie would have really sucked... dumb cows and chickens revolt against the machines!  ;)\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}
 {"tstamp": 1722264631.6779, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722264631.5192, "finish": 1722264631.6779, "ip": "", "conv_id": "048949c86e1d40d2994ef35fc63d4eda", "model_name": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "prompt": "Why Did the Machines Even Bother With a Matrix?", "output": [["Why Did the Machines Even Bother With a Matrix?", "Scifi Stackexchange\n\nQ: Why use full brained humans as batteries? \nPossible Duplicate:\nIs the basic premise of humans as a power source in The Matrix reasonable?\nWhy Did the Machines Even Bother With a Matrix? \n\nThe machines in The Matrix series use humans as batteries. That's OK. But why did the machines not alter their livestock such that the matrix itself would be unnecessary?  \nConsider the recently proposed headless chicken farm. Something similar for the human batteries would seem to be an ideal solution for logical machines. No longer would they need to spend resources maintaining a virtual reality for their batteries. The energy, physical hardware and programs running the matrix could then be put to who knows what other uses.\n\nA: The explanation for the use of human brains would seem to be the fact that our complex thoughts lead to higher level of brain activity, thus resulting in exponentially more synapses firing (i.e. more electrical activity to harvest).\nThat makes human brains far more efficient than the brains of animals, even with the overhead of maintaining the matrix.  Plus, that movie would have really sucked... dumb cows and chickens revolt against the machines!  ;)\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}
+{"tstamp": 1722264684.2979, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722264684.1548, "finish": 1722264684.2979, "ip": "", "conv_id": "63185c66a3fd45bb86c73c39a5fb9cc6", "model_name": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "prompt": "Why did the machines in the matrix keep the humans alive?", "output": [["Why did the machines in the matrix keep the humans alive?", "Scifi Stackexchange\n\nQ: Why use full brained humans as batteries? \nPossible Duplicate:\nIs the basic premise of humans as a power source in The Matrix reasonable?\nWhy Did the Machines Even Bother With a Matrix? \n\nThe machines in The Matrix series use humans as batteries. That's OK. But why did the machines not alter their livestock such that the matrix itself would be unnecessary?  \nConsider the recently proposed headless chicken farm. Something similar for the human batteries would seem to be an ideal solution for logical machines. No longer would they need to spend resources maintaining a virtual reality for their batteries. The energy, physical hardware and programs running the matrix could then be put to who knows what other uses.\n\nA: The explanation for the use of human brains would seem to be the fact that our complex thoughts lead to higher level of brain activity, thus resulting in exponentially more synapses firing (i.e. more electrical activity to harvest).\nThat makes human brains far more efficient than the brains of animals, even with the overhead of maintaining the matrix.  Plus, that movie would have really sucked... dumb cows and chickens revolt against the machines!  ;)\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}
+{"tstamp": 1722264743.9852, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722264743.8531, "finish": 1722264743.9852, "ip": "", "conv_id": "57aa2b0d48ce420395829ce81108ee2a", "model_name": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "prompt": "What did the machines in the matrix use humans for?", "output": [["What did the machines in the matrix use humans for?", "Scifi Stackexchange\n\nQ: Is the basic premise of humans as a power source in The Matrix reasonable? In The Matrix the machines \"grow\" humans to provide a source of power. Is this really feasible from the perspective of power generation (never mind all the business of growing/feeding people)? Wouldn't the machines just use nuclear power?\nEdit: For what it's worth, in the movie Morpheus explains that the human power is \"combined with a form of fusion.\"\n\nA: I have read a theory that machines are using \"unused part of human brain\" to control nuclear fusion -- the second part seems reasonable, but first of all, there is no such thing as \"unused part of the brain\" and probably the computational power required to run matrix itself is way higher than this needed to control fusion.\nThe other option is that machines are using human intuition or clairvoyance skills, but this is also a fantasy.\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}
+{"tstamp": 1722264778.0968, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722264777.9242, "finish": 1722264778.0968, "ip": "", "conv_id": "a8b54decf4474d558ac23e203a211d06", "model_name": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "prompt": "Why did the machines in the matrix even bother keeping humans around?", "output": [["Why did the machines in the matrix even bother keeping humans around?", "Scifi Stackexchange\n\nQ: Why use full brained humans as batteries? \nPossible Duplicate:\nIs the basic premise of humans as a power source in The Matrix reasonable?\nWhy Did the Machines Even Bother With a Matrix? \n\nThe machines in The Matrix series use humans as batteries. That's OK. But why did the machines not alter their livestock such that the matrix itself would be unnecessary?  \nConsider the recently proposed headless chicken farm. Something similar for the human batteries would seem to be an ideal solution for logical machines. No longer would they need to spend resources maintaining a virtual reality for their batteries. The energy, physical hardware and programs running the matrix could then be put to who knows what other uses.\n\nA: The explanation for the use of human brains would seem to be the fact that our complex thoughts lead to higher level of brain activity, thus resulting in exponentially more synapses firing (i.e. more electrical activity to harvest).\nThat makes human brains far more efficient than the brains of animals, even with the overhead of maintaining the matrix.  Plus, that movie would have really sucked... dumb cows and chickens revolt against the machines!  ;)\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}
+{"tstamp": 1722264801.3153, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "BM25", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722264801.0122, "finish": 1722264801.3153, "ip": "", "conv_id": "5d4ba7e4ba2b472ab46e7a6ef667b1a9", "model_name": "BM25", "prompt": "Why did the machines in the matrix even bother keeping humans around?", "output": [["Why did the machines in the matrix even bother keeping humans around?", "Scifi Stackexchange\n\nQ: Why use full brained humans as batteries? \nPossible Duplicate:\nIs the basic premise of humans as a power source in The Matrix reasonable?\nWhy Did the Machines Even Bother With a Matrix? \n\nThe machines in The Matrix series use humans as batteries. That's OK. But why did the machines not alter their livestock such that the matrix itself would be unnecessary?  \nConsider the recently proposed headless chicken farm. Something similar for the human batteries would seem to be an ideal solution for logical machines. No longer would they need to spend resources maintaining a virtual reality for their batteries. The energy, physical hardware and programs running the matrix could then be put to who knows what other uses.\n\nA: The explanation for the use of human brains would seem to be the fact that our complex thoughts lead to higher level of brain activity, thus resulting in exponentially more synapses firing (i.e. more electrical activity to harvest).\nThat makes human brains far more efficient than the brains of animals, even with the overhead of maintaining the matrix.  Plus, that movie would have really sucked... dumb cows and chickens revolt against the machines!  ;)\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}
+{"tstamp": 1722264894.4237, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "BM25", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722264894.4123, "finish": 1722264894.4237, "ip": "", "conv_id": "1fb4ad3d2d184c40ac1a588e3ee5b531", "model_name": "BM25", "prompt": "Why did the machines in The Matrix keep humans around?", "output": [["Why did the machines in The Matrix keep humans around?", "Scifi Stackexchange\n\nQ: What happens to a person after they die in the Matrix? Machines keep humans in the Matrix as they are a source of energy. Why did they make it so that when a human is hurt in the Matrix, they're bodies hurt themselves in real life (in the tank)? If a human dies in the Matrix, do they die in the real world? Or just get flushed out of their tank? Isn't it kind of a waste?\n\nA: The body cannot live without the mind. The machines can't get around that. But nothing is wasted. They liquefy the dead so that they can be fed intravenously to the living.\n\n\n\nJump to 45 seconds for Morpheus' first hand explanation.\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}
+{"tstamp": 1722264914.7007, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722264914.5463, "finish": 1722264914.7007, "ip": "", "conv_id": "ebea37c6191f4ce2a3e94ba4ce257b8a", "model_name": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "prompt": "Why did the machines in The Matrix keep humans around?", "output": [["Why did the machines in The Matrix keep humans around?", "Scifi Stackexchange\n\nQ: Why use full brained humans as batteries? \nPossible Duplicate:\nIs the basic premise of humans as a power source in The Matrix reasonable?\nWhy Did the Machines Even Bother With a Matrix? \n\nThe machines in The Matrix series use humans as batteries. That's OK. But why did the machines not alter their livestock such that the matrix itself would be unnecessary?  \nConsider the recently proposed headless chicken farm. Something similar for the human batteries would seem to be an ideal solution for logical machines. No longer would they need to spend resources maintaining a virtual reality for their batteries. The energy, physical hardware and programs running the matrix could then be put to who knows what other uses.\n\nA: The explanation for the use of human brains would seem to be the fact that our complex thoughts lead to higher level of brain activity, thus resulting in exponentially more synapses firing (i.e. more electrical activity to harvest).\nThat makes human brains far more efficient than the brains of animals, even with the overhead of maintaining the matrix.  Plus, that movie would have really sucked... dumb cows and chickens revolt against the machines!  ;)\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}