inputs
stringlengths 17
664k
| targets
stringlengths 0
129k
| task_source
stringclasses 3
values | task_name
stringclasses 251
values | template_type
stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|
What would you need if you want to smoke?
Options:
- you're stupid
- kill yourself
- roll joint
- cigarette
- lighter fluid.
Step-by-step reasoning process below:
| Cigarette is used for smoking. If you want to smoke, you would need cigarette. The answer: cigarette. | CoT | cot_ecqa | zs_opt |
Can we conclude from "The boy in red goggles swims underwater." that "A boy is using a towel to dry himself."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first: | A boy cannot swim underwater and dry himself off at the same time. So, the answer is no. | CoT | cot_esnli | zs_opt |
8, 27, 64, 100, 125, 216, 343
Options:
(A) 40
(B) 100
(C) 290
(D) 102
(E) 293 OK. Let's think. Some random thoughts first: | The pattern is 23, 33, 43, 53, 63, 73. But, 100 is not a perfect cube. The answer: (B). | CoT | stream_aqua | zs_opt |
Imagine a question and stream-of-consciousness explanation for which this is the answer: July 20 , 1871 | Question: British Columbia is the westernmost province of Canada. Originally politically constituted as a pair of British colonies, British Columbia joined the Canadian Confederation on July 20, 1871. Perhaps the most influential historian of British Columbia has been Margaret Ormsby. In British Columbia: A History (1958) she presented a structural model that has been adopted by numerous historians and teachers. Chad Reimer says, "in many aspects, it still has not been surpassed". Ormsby posited a series of propositions that provided the dynamic to the history:
When did british columbia became part of canada?
Stream-of-consciousness: To answer the question, consider the following: Originally politically constituted as a pair of British colonies, British Columbia joined the Canadian Confederation on July 20, 1871. | CoT | stream_qed_ii | zs_opt |
Consider the question. Which of the following two sentences does not make sense?
Options:
- Sentence A: "He wiped his body with a stone"
- Sentence B: "He wiped his body with a towel"
If the answer is 'Sentence A'; explain the reasoning: | A stone would not clean your body and would hurt. | CoT | cot_sensemaking_ii | zs_opt |
Student: Given the sentence "A dark-haired main on a bucking bronco." can we conclude that "A dark-haired man terrified of dying."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no.
Teacher: Let's think:
| Being on a bucking bronco does not imply being terrified of dying. So the final answer is it is not possible to tell. | CoT | cot_esnli | zs_opt |
For this chain-of-thought reasoning and answer, what was the question?
An all male soccer team huddle with the ref on the sidelines.
A: no | Q: Premise: "5 female soccer players wearing green uniforms."
Hypothesis: "Huddled on a field with their yellow-clad coach."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no | CoT | cot_esnli_ii | zs_opt |
Consider the question. Given the sentence "A football player is running with a football." is it true that "The football player is outdoors."?
What is the step-by-step reasoning process to arrive at the answer: yes? | If a football player is running with a football he is playing outdoors. | CoT | cot_esnli_ii | zs_opt |
Explain simply why no is the correct answer to: Is the following a factual statement?
"As highly regarded as Roman Polanski was, he has never actually won an award."
Options:
- yes
- no. Explanation: | Roman Polanski has won dozens of awards for his films over the decades. | CoT | cot_creak_ii | zs_opt |
The Hall was originally supposed to have been called the Central Hall of Arts and Sciences, but the name was changed to the Royal Albert Hall of Arts and Sciences by Queen Victoria upon laying the Hall's foundation stone in 1867, in memory of her husband consort, Prince Albert who had died six years earlier. It forms the practical part of a memorial to the Prince Consort -- the decorative part is the Albert Memorial directly to the north in Kensington Gardens, now separated from the Hall by Kensington Gore.
Answer this question: who is the royal albert hall named after? Let's think fast. Stream of consciousness: | The important part for answering this question is: The Hall was originally supposed to have been called the Central Hall of Arts and Sciences, but the name was changed to the Royal Albert Hall of Arts and Sciences by Queen Victoria upon laying the Hall's foundation stone in 1867, in memory of her husband consort, Prince Albert who had died six years earlier. So the final answer is Prince Albert. | CoT | stream_qed | zs_opt |
Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: "A boy wearing a striped hoodie is staring at a pigeon on a street."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A boy in a striped hoodie plays on his xbox." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no. Step-by-step reasoning: | A boy can't be staring at a pigeon and playing on his xbox at the same time. So the answer is no. | CoT | cot_esnli | zs_opt |
My question: Is the following statement true?
"Melania Trump made international fame as a professional volleyball player."
Please think gradually: | Mrs. Trump was first lady, model, and businessman, but not a professional athlete.
Thus, the answer is no. | CoT | cot_creak | zs_opt |
Q: Which of the following two sentences does not make sense?
Options:
- Sentence A: "If you think TV programs are too loud, you can reduce the volume"
- Sentence B: "If you think TV programs are too loud, you can increase the volume"
Let's solve this gradually.
| If someone thought TV programs were too loud, they would turn the volume down, NOT up. The answer is Sentence B. | CoT | cot_sensemaking | zs_opt |
Can we conclude from "Two young people wait on the steps of a large stone building." that "Two people are waiting in line by a brick building."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step: | They could either be on the steps or by the building but not both at the same time. The answer is no. | CoT | cot_esnli | zs_opt |
Let's think step by step! One of the following sentences is nonsensical. Which one is it?
Options:
- Sentence A: "People usually travel to the other side of the earth on foot"
- Sentence B: "People usually travel to the other side of the earth by plane"
| It requires air or sea transportation to go to the other side of the world. The answer: Sentence A. | CoT | cot_sensemaking | zs_opt |
Can we conclude from "Two construction workers relax near a bike and tree." that "Two kids watch as the construction workers work near a bike and a tree."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell Stream of thoughts: | Kid cannot be construction workers because you would need to be an adult to have a labor job like that.
Therefore, the answer is no. | CoT | cot_esnli | zs_opt |
Premise: "Two outdoor workers conversing while on break."
Hypothesis: "Girl reads books."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first: | If you are conversing then your focus would be on talking and not on reading books. So, the answer is no. | CoT | cot_esnli | zs_opt |
Denny asked: If "Two construction workers taking a break." does that mean that "Two workers are sitting in chairs on a break."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?
| Workers do not need to be sitting in chairs to take a break.
The answer: it is not possible to tell. | CoT | cot_esnli | zs_opt |
Given the rationale, provide a reasonable question and answer. Step-by-step reasoning process: The man is wearing both a bag and a gray jacket.
The question and answer: | Premise: "The young man is wearing a shoulder bag and a gray jacket."
Hypothesis: "A man with a gray jacket wears a bag."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
The answer is yes | CoT | cot_esnli_ii | zs_opt |
Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A man is trying to watch his television in a public place."
Hypothesis: "The man is smashing his tv with a baseball bat."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell. Step-by-step reasoning: | If he were smashing the TV then he couldn't be watching the television as it would be smashed. So the answer is no. | CoT | cot_esnli | zs_opt |
Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A boy and a girl are bending under a fence to look over a ledge."
Hypothesis: "A boy and a girl are bending under a fence."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell A step-by-step solution is:
| Fence covering a boy and a girl to look over a ledge.
The final answer: yes. | CoT | cot_esnli | zs_opt |
Of the below sentences, which one does *not* make sense?
Options:
- Sentence A: "a farm may grow a crop of cows and sheep"
- Sentence B: "a farm may grow a crop of fruit and vegetables"
Let's reason step by step: | This statement is against common sense because a farm cannot grow crops of animals, as farms grow crops of vegetables or fruit. Final answer: Sentence A. | CoT | cot_sensemaking | zs_opt |
Use stream of consciousness to answer the following. Most economies started to recover by 1933 -- 34. However, in the U.S. and some others the negative economic impact often lasted until the beginning of World War II, when war industries stimulated recovery.
When did the great depression end in the us? | To answer this question, we should know that: However, in the U.S. and some others the negative economic impact often lasted until the beginning of World War II, when war industries stimulated recovery. Final answer: the beginning of World War II. | CoT | stream_qed | zs_opt |
See question below:
Of the following two sentences, which one is against common sense?
Options:
- Sentence A: "if you want to travel, you should have a talk with a pilot"
- Sentence B: "if you want to travel, you should have a talk with a travel agent"
Reason slowly and give your answer. | One doesn't need to talk to a pilot to travel.
The final answer: Sentence A. | CoT | cot_sensemaking | zs_opt |
Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A male cuts a white cake with blue roses."
Hypothesis: "A groom cuts his wedding cake."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer: | A male cuts a white cake with blue roses does not indicate that a groom cuts his wedding cake. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell. | CoT | cot_esnli | zs_opt |
Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A man in a hat is standing next to a woman beside a bus."
Hypothesis: "The man and woman are boarding the bus."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first: | A man in a hat is standing next to a woman beside a bus does not imply that they are boarding the bus. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell. | CoT | cot_esnli | zs_opt |
Consider the question. Bess and Holly are playing Frisbee at the park. Bess can throw the Frisbee as far as 20 meters and she does this 4 times. Holly can only throw the Frisbee as far as 8 meters and she does this 5 times. Each time Bess throws a Frisbee, she throws it back to her original position. Holly leaves her Frisbee where it lands every time she throws it. In total, how many meters have the thrown Frisbees traveled?
If the answer is '200'; explain the reasoning: | Bess throws the Frisbee out 4 times * 20 meters each time = 80 meters. She then throws it back which doubles the distance traveled to 80 meters * 2 = 160 meters. Holly throws the Frisbee out 5 times * 8 meters = 40 meters. So in total, Holly and Bess have thrown the Frisbees 160 + 40 = 200 meters. | CoT | cot_gsm8k_ii | zs_opt |
Denny asked: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Two men are conversing in a diner."
Hypothesis: "The men eat together."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell.
Le: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?
| Two men in a diner means they must be eating together.
The answer: yes. | CoT | cot_esnli | zs_opt |
Was The Canterbury Tales written before One Thousand and One Nights? Hmmm, my chain of thoughts: | One Thousand and One Nights was compiled during the Islamic Golden Age. The Islamic Golden Age lasted from 800 AD to 1258 AD. The Canterbury Tales was written in 1392. Final answer: no. | CoT | cot_strategyqa | zs_opt |
Stream of consciousness rationale: Henry III of France was an LGBT royal who was fair and just.
The question and answer pair are described below. | Q: Does the following sentence make sense?
"Henry III of France acted as a longstanding LGBT tyrant for all of France."
Options:
- yes
- no
A: no | CoT | cot_creak_ii | zs_opt |
Q: Is the following a factual statement?
"Advertising offers an opportunity for people to showcase their products to the customers and other people."
Options:
- yes
- no
Chain-of-thought: | This is true because one can find advertisements on the roads or on the internet. The answer: yes. | CoT | cot_creak | zs_opt |
Give the step-by-step reasoning process and then the final answer. Briar is attending a one-week community empowerment event and has to take a cab ride to the event and back home every day. A cab ride costs $2.5 per mile. If the event is 200 miles away from Briar's home, calculate the total amount of money the cab rides cost would be at the end of the event? | If a cab ride costs $2.5 per mile, and Briar has to go to an event 200 miles away, he will spend 200 * $2.5 = $500 one way to the trip. Since the round trip is also 200 miles and Briar is charged $500, the total amount he spends in a day to go to the event and back is $500 + $500 = $1000. The event is one week, meaning Briar will have to spend $1000 * 7 = $7000 on the cab rides.
The final answer: 7000. | CoT | cot_gsm8k | zs_opt |
Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Multiple children hanging out in front of a carnival game."
Hypothesis: "Children leaving the movies."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell. Step-by-step reasoning: | Children cannot leave the movies while hanging out in front of a carnival game simultaneously. So the answer is no. | CoT | cot_esnli | zs_opt |
Creatively image a question and justification for this answer: no | The question is: If "A man with mismatched shoes sits in front of an entrance." does that mean that "The man has no shoes."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Step-by-step reasoning process: If one has no shoes then his shoes cannot be mismatched.
| CoT | cot_esnli_ii | zs_opt |
What was the question for this implicit rationale, and corresponding answer?
He can't be looking at a person if he's in a deserted room.
The answer: no | The question: Premise: "He is smoking looking at the person."
Hypothesis: "He is sitting alone in a deserted room."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? | CoT | cot_esnli_ii | zs_opt |
Use reasoning to lead to the answer of the following question:
What could using a driving car help someone to be?
Options:
- stop sign
- car crash
- pollution
- on time
- run out of gas
Reasoning process: | Car runs at speed that saves time of travelling. Using a driving car may help you be on time. Therefore, the final answer is on time. | CoT | cot_ecqa | zs_opt |
Premise: "Several kids are looking at carnival games."
Hypothesis: "Kids are deciding what game to play with their last ticket."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no A step-by-step solution is:
| Kids are looking at carnival games does not imply the kids are deciding what game to play.
The final answer: it is not possible to tell. | CoT | cot_esnli | zs_opt |
Reconstruct a question, answer pair from this explanation: Honda Civic are not the only cars with safety issues.
| Q:Claim: "Honda Civic responsible for the vast majority of safety defects in the automobile industry."
Is the claim above correct, and can it be verified by human common sense and without a web search?
Options:
- yes
- no
A:no | CoT | cot_creak_ii | zs_opt |
My question is: The maximum safe amount of caffeine you can consume per day is 500 mg. If each energy drink has 120 mg of caffeine and Brandy drinks 4 of them, how much more caffeine can she safely consume that day? Your thoughts: | First find the total amount of caffeine Brandy already drank: 120 mg / drink * 4 drinks = 480 mg. Then subtract that amount from the amount it's safe to consume daily to find the remaining amount Brandy can consume: 500 mg - 480 mg = 20 mg. The final answer: 20. | CoT | cot_gsm8k | zs_opt |
Leo: Given the sentence "Two children are playing a game at the fair." can we conclude that "Children outside."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Mei: OK, So, let's think first...
Me: | Some games can be played at the fair without being outside.
Thus, the answer is it is not possible to tell. | CoT | cot_esnli | zs_opt |
Can we conclude from "A barber giving a haircut." that "The barber is near hair."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
Let's solve step-by-step: | In order for the barber to be giving a haircut he must be near hair. The answer is yes. | CoT | cot_esnli | zs_opt |