prompts
stringlengths 590
30k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Thanks. Please keep me on the list for the more detailed management report as well. Leonardo Pacheco 09/21/2000 05:36 PM To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: Public Report 09-20 ----------------- [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Rick Committee staff attendees included David L. Cavicke (Committee Majority Counsel) Brian McCullough (Committee Majority Professional Staff Member) Christopher Knauer (Committee Minority Investigator) and Michael Geffroy (Committee Minority Counsel). Jim [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Ed I am sure I shall screw up sooner or later (given my aging brain and amount of work). This guy will have to change his name to Ed Krapels to stay employed. Vince [/INST] Category: Personal but in professional context(e.g., it was good working with you) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Shanna talk with Rick but he will be working until June or July then he will retire and be available as a consultant to us. m Shanna Funkhouser@ENRON 02/08/2001 10:09 AM To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Rick Subject: Confidential -- Terry Thorn Mike I wanted to let you know that Cindy Skinner passed the information she gathered on Terry to me. Please let me know what the status is with his termination ie timing etc. so that I may start the process. Thanks Shanna X59386 [/INST] Category: Employment arrangements(job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Below is the text of recommendations taken from the summary of recommendations in the Cheney Energy Report being released later this morning that focus on coal and coal-related issues including environmental. The NEPD Group (National Energy Policy Development) recommends that the President direct the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to propose multi-pollutant legislation. The NEPD Group recommends that the President direct the EPA Administrator to work with Congress to propose legislation that would establish a flexible market-based program to significantly reduce and cap emissions fo sulfur dioxide nitrogen oxides and mercury from electric power generators. Such a program (with appropriate measures to address local concerns) would provide significant public health benefits even as we increase electricity supplies. Establish mandatory reduction targets to emissions of three main pollutants: sulfur dioxide nitrogen oxides and mercury. Phase in reductions over a reasonable period of time similar to the successful acid rain reduction program established by the 1990 amendments to the Clean Air Act. Provide regulatory certainty to allow utilities to make modifications to their plants without fear of new litigation. Provide market-based incentives such as emissions trading credits to help achieve the required reductions. The NEPD Group recognizes the importance of looking to technology to help us meet the goals of increasing electricity generation while protecting our environment. To that end the NEPD Group recommends that the President direct the Department of Energy to continue to develop advanced clean coal technology by: Investing $2 billion over 10 years to fund research in clean coal technologies. Supporting a permanent extension of the existing research and development tax credit. Directing federal agencies to explore regulatory approaches that will encourage advancements in environmental technology. The NEPD Group recomemnds that the President direct federal agencies to provide greater regulatory certainty relating to coal electricity generation through clear policies that are easily applied to business decisions. The NEPD Group recommends that the President direct the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency in consultation with the Secretary of Energy and other relevant agencies to review New Source Review regulations including administrative interpretations and implementation and report to the President within 90 days on the impact of the regulations on investment in new utility and refinery generation capacity energy efficiency and environmental protection. The NEPD Group recommends that the President direct the Attorney General to review existing enforcement actions regarding New Source Review to ensure that the enforcement actions are consistent with the Clean Air Act and its regulations. The NEPD Group recommends that the President direct federal agencies to support continued research into global climate change continue efforts to identify environmentally and cost-effective ways to use market mechanisms and incentives continue development of new technologies and cooperate with allies including through international processes to develop technologies market-based incentives and other innovative approaches to address the issue of global climate change. [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: please forward to Vicky Sharp. ----------------- [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: I know we got a lot of grief on the Hill when we had our fight with UC/CSU. Now we have settled and this release will go out (with some modification) today. ----------------- [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: I'll be happy to accomodate. I can take you through Enron's view of how markets overall are evolving and how we approach those markets. I'd also like to spend some time reviewing interstate transmission policy and how it affects Western energy markets. Steve Reynolds <SREYNO@state.wy.us> on 05/23/2001 09:40:11 AM To: <skean@enron.com> cc: <sland@enron.com> Subject: Wyoming Energy Commission subject Steve it was great to meet you and hear your remarks yesterday. For the speaking engagement next Wednesday I would like you to focus upon the Enron strategic model of virtual integration of market forces in the evolution of energy development. Wyoming represents a huge material resource base and the commission is charged with the development and promotion of such. But the Governor's message is that we cannot see ourselves as producers and exporters in the traditional sense. We will continue to have the status of a colony if we do not recognize the new dynamics of how these market places are evolving. If you set the stage with a presentation of Enron strategy then we will discuss how a state with its agencies and auathority can play a role in this evolution. I have set your time for 45 minutes which can include a short Qand A period. But your message can be as succint as you can make it and get the point across. You may have to present the Enron case a number of different ways but the Governor will give you latitude to make the point. You will be welcome to participate in a following panel which will address role playing by the state and the commission. Plan to join us for lunch. If you need more detail let me know. Thanks! Stephen [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: The Senate Governmental Affairs Committee held an unusually long hearing today (9:30 am to 4:30 pm) on FERC's responses to the California situation and other related energy issues. The star witness was Gov. Davis. Others were Govs. Martz of Montana and Hoeven of North Dakota against price caps Sens. Murkowski Murray and Cantwell Washington State's attorney general Oregon's PUC chairman and the five FERC commissioners. Once Davis left after several hours of testimony and two rounds of questions most of the press and audience left. Enron was mentioned several times as follows: 1. Sen. Thompson the Ranking Republican mentioned Lockyer's Spike comments in the context of asking Gov. Davis about why business would make new investments in the state when on top of the regulatory uncertainty there is the broader political hostility expressed in this way by state officials. Davis had two chances to disavow Lockyer and did not. (Thompson gave him a second chance when he basically repeated the question and made specific reference again to Spike asking Davis if FERC acted this week because of the AG's Spike comments.) The first time Davis said that the people he represents are mad they want him to fight back this is rough business the industry people are used to a wildcatter's environment things occassionally get out of hand and we are not going to take it. On the second instance he said that the state was building new power plants and investment was not being diminished. 2. Sen. Bennett (R-UT) did an excellent job questioning Gov. Davis about his handling of the situation using quotes from California newspapers to make the case that Davis was slow to act. He also argued that the state had done a bad job as a power purchaser contrasting the state's recent 8-year contract with Constellation for power at $150 peak and $59 off-peak with Enron's willingness last year to sell them power for five years at $50. The Republicans also pressed Davis on why he attacks out-of-state generators but is not nearly as vocal about California munis who charged even more. Davis said they should make refunds too. 3. While not saying Enron by name Gov. Davis did make a comment about companies with trading floors that compete with the New York Stock Exchange with meteorologists and very talented people who might have the ability to find loopholes in the new order. He said this in answer to a question about what FERC needed to do now that the new order was issued and he said watch out for manipulation by those subject to the order. 4. Sen. Thompson pressed Washington State AG Gregoire about why she appeared to be investigating out-of-state suppliers even though they had a small percentage of the market in her state with lots of document requests and other investigative action while not doing the same to others. During that exchange either Thompson or the AG (I think it was the AG) said Enron had over $1 billion in sales to Washington State. Enron was not on the list of companies Thompson or the AG said were subject to her information demands. She said she would be expanding her inquiry though. Highlights and Analysis 1. As started at yesterday's Senate Energy hearing the mantra from the Western Democrats was: we want our money back. Chairman Lieberman and others pressed FERC about how California could get refunds and the same in other Western states particularly Oregon and Washington. Chairman Hebert said that the settlement conference process would allow all parties to raise all issues including refunds in California and outside California. He said that the conference could include issues that the commission could not act on itself including refunds not otherwise allowed under the Federal Power Act. Chairman Lieberman vowed to keep the committee active in overseeing FERC's activities in implementing the new order particularly as it relates to refunds. While he acknowledged that new legislation could not apply to pending cases he seemed inclined to pursue legislation to repeal the 60 day delay in the Federal Power Act relating to refunds. 2. Commissioner Wood spoke of the need to increase the penalities and enforcement tools available to the commission including the ability to order short suspensions of authority for regulated entities to transact business treble damages and other administrative penalties. There was also discussion among the committee and commissioners about beefing up FERC's market monitoring capabilities so that it acted more like the SEC FCC and FTC than it has in the past. 3. The Democrats on the committee and among the witnesses said that FERC's latest order is a step in the right direction. None of them called for legislative action on price caps as proposed by Sens. Feinstein and Smith. Sen. Murkowski had done a good job of taking the wind out of the legislated price cap sails by saying at the start of the hearing when he testified that the bill's sponsors had pulled back from swift action when they spoke at yesterday's hearing. Davis did say the still thinks that cost-based rates are better but he said the new order is some price relief and that it corrected the mistakes in the April order. 4. There was some discussion of natural gas again. Davis said that FERC should now turn its attention to natural gas. He said that El Paso controlled too much of the capacity until recently. He called on FERC to enforce laws against price manipulation. (Note: we have had several back channel reports that the Lieberman committee intends to look into the El Paso and Williams cases now at FERC about alleged affiliate issues.) 5. There was some discussion of the termination of the new FERC order. Lieberman pressed several witnesses about whether Sept. 2002 is too soon. Davis said it was and that they needed at least until the end of 2002 if not more time and that order should apply until California has enough new generation in place. Hebert did not back down when pressed by Lieberman later in the hearing saying there needs to be a deadline to get action on new supplies however he and the others basically said they would revisit the issue if events warrant. 6. Several times Sen. Lieberman and others said they generally support deregulation but that the effort to get more states to do so will never happen if the price situation is not brought under control and public confidence restored. 7. Gov. Davis did throw a few kind words toward Pres. Bush and Pat Wood saying that each was open to doing more about the high cost of natural gas to California including the possible reimposition of rate regulation of transportation to California. He said he liked Pat Wood and he noted that FERC did not take serious price mitigation action until the two new Bush appointees were on the commission. 8. Lieberman asked the Washington State AG whether the Justice Dept. or the FTC were doing anything to address high energy prices. She said not to her knowledge even though she has asked them to do so. We can expect a Lieberman et al request for Justice and FTC involvement going forward I suspect. 9. While Chairman Lieberman's tone and closing comments were in the nature of his normal thoughtful tone it is clear that he and others see this as a major issue for them to ride. He commended FERC at the end of the hearing for doing their best but pledged he would stay involved closing the session with a smile and the words see you soon. [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: We need to communicate with Massey before he gets completely carried away blaming the interstate pipeline business for gas price spikes. We need to get him the information regarding Cal LDCs failure to fill storage and their opposition to additional pipeline construction in the state. Shelley -- could you forward copies of the LDC filings to the group. Should Joe or I (or both) try to see massey when I am in town next week? ----------------- [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: ----------------- [/INST] Category: Empty message |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Per last week's call I am circulating updated FERC staff talking points to the entire Western Wholesale group. This version of the talking points incorporates comments from Steffes Walton and Perrino. Phillip Allen: people on the call were wondering if there are any informal messages the West gas desk would like to relay to FERC staff. Notes however that ex parte contacts such as these generally must avoid issues that are being currently litigated by the FERC. [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: This follows up on Rick's inquiry late last week on the talks between EPSA and EEI on reliability. Yesterday I spoke with Mark Bennett and Donn Salvosa of the EPSA staff. Mark did the talking. The upshot is that EPSA and EEI are meeting to see if they can't agree on reliability legislation. EEI is working off of the NERC draft and has sent a version to EPSA dated 9/14 (see attached) that was the basis for last Thursday's meeting. EPSA is now doing some drafting of its own. I need to read the 9/14 draft but the fact that they are working off of the old NERC language is of considerable concern. EPSA staff emphasizes the value of having EEI off the NERC reservation (which is good in terms of showing that there is NERC consensus) but I think EPSA staff may be too flexible in how they are approaching it. I reminded them of our position and concerns and of Jim's prepared statement on EPSA's behalf filed for the Sept. 11 Barton hearing. EPSA staff claims that other EPSA members are OK with them embarking on this project. It is not clear if this effort will succeed. EPSA staff said EEI's board insists on having engineers do reliability which is objectionable to EPSA. EPSA staff seems to think that some type of reliablity SRO is inevitable and that it is wise to get the best one they can. I will check with some other EPSA members. [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Looks good nice work. Let's get it out Vance Meyer 06/11/2001 01:02 PM To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Demonstration Procedure This is the demonstration procedure for Enron offices. It has been reviewed by Security Legal and at least 3 PR folks. Provided you have no issues I recommend that we put it out from Mark's machine with a tip-on note to 1) officers 2) PR people 3) security people. Vance [/INST] Category: Document editing/checking(collaboration) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Ken Lay speaking and James J. Hoecker [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Yes please. From: Elizabeth Linnell on 05/16/2001 12:02 PM To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: Astros I noticed that several groups within your overall organization charged tickets or our suite to their cost centers this month. I know of the business purpose for a couple but not all. Let me know if you're interested in this info and I'll get more data from Greg. [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Anne That's great. The meeting is at 3:00 in or area on th 19th. Vince [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Reporter(WSJ) Ed Dardis UW - Mary Clark Clarence [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Frank I am definitely interested in the resume. I can meet the candidate on campus when I visit my son. I am planning to come to Palo Alto around Thanksgiving. Also Energy and Power Risk Management (an English publication) organizes every year in Houston a POWER RISK conference (typically in May). They ask me for recommendations regarding speakers. Would you be interested in participating? Vince Frank A. Wolak <wolak@zia.stanford.edu> on 11/13/2000 08:44:57 AM To: vkamins@enron.com cc: Subject: Vince I am writing about a student of mine who is on the job market this year. When you stopped by my office about 18 months ago you asked if I had any students that might be appropriate for your group. Although I didn't at the time now I do. This student has excellent technical skills including an M.S. in Statistics and a Ph.D. in Economics by the end of the current academic year. His dissertation research is on the investment behavior of Independent Power Producers in the US. As a result of research assistance he has done for me he knows the California market very well and is familiar with the other ISOs. I think he would be an excellent match for you. The only problem is that he will probably have many other options available. However I definitely think he's worth a look. If you'd like him to send you a CV please let me know. Thanks. Frank Wolak Professor Frank A. Wolak email: wolak@zia.stanford.edu Department of Economics Phone: 650-723-3944 (Office) Stanford University FAX: 650-725-5702 Stanford CA 94305-6072 Phone: 650-856-0109 (Home) World-Wide Web Page: Cell Phone: 650-814-0107 [/INST] Category: Employment arrangements(job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Can one of you forward to Ed or whoever you feel appropriate? ----------------- [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: I'm still a junkie .... please email copies of the orders. [/INST] Category: Document editing/checking(collaboration) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Can you circulate the link to Cal TV again? Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com> on 07/16/2001 01:58:41 PM Please respond to <sgovenar@govadv.com> To: Ban Sharma <ban.sharma@enron.com> David Leboe <David.Leboe@ENRON.com> Eric Letke <eletke@enron.com> Jennifer Thome <Jennifer.Thome@enron.com> Ken Smith <ken@kdscommunications.com> Bev Hansen <bhansen@lhom.com> Hedy Govenar <hgovenar@govadv.com> Miyung Buster <Miyung.Buster@enron.com> Janel Guerrero <Janel.Guerrero@enron.com> Robert Frank <rfrank@enron.com> Mike Day <MDay@GMSSR.com> Leslie Lawner <Leslie.Lawner@enron.com> Harry. Kingerski@enron. com <Harry.Kingerski@enron.com> Karen Denne <kdenne@enron.com> Steven Kean <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com> Alan Comnes <acomnes@enron.com> Susan J Mara <smara@enron.com> Paul Kaufman <paul.kaufman@enron.com> Jeff Dasovich <jdasovic@enron.com> Jim Steffes <james.d.steffes@enron.com> Rick Shapiro <rshapiro@enron.com> cc: Subject: Senator Dunn Hearing THE SELECT COMMITTEE TO INVESTIGATE PRICE MANIPULATION OF THE WHOLESALE ENERGY MARKET WILL MEET ON WEDNESDAY JULY 18 AT 9:30 A.M. IN ROOM 3191 TO REVIEW COMPLIANCE WITH SUBPOENAS FOR DUKE DYNEGY RELIANT AES NRG AND WILLIAMS. [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Anne Thanks. I shall join. Vince [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: ----------------- [/INST] Category: Empty message(due to missing attachment) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: ----------------- [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: ----------------- [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: 6011 3000 5062 8237 12/02 [/INST] Category: Purely Personal |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Hi Julie Rice asked me to teach another course on energy derivatives and I plan to use the book as the main source. You can inform them that they should keep the books in stock and probably order a few more copies. I am in London right now and will stay here for a few more days. Swamped with work as usual. I was on the road for the last 2 weeks. The tropical storm unleashed the fury on my neighborhood (20 inches in one night) but we survived without major problems. The only problem I had was an overflowing swimming pool (it took 45 minutes to go from a comfortable slack to a full condition). Vince [/INST] Category: Purely Personal |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Rosie -- please check Ken's calendar. This would be a great one to do if we can squeeze it in. Nick -- congrats on what looks like a great new opportunity to make progress. I am in all week and would love to talk to you and Joe. If we can't otherwise make schedules work call me at home after hours Houston time (713-621-6550). Nicholas O'Day 08/27/2000 10:49 PM To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: Ken Lay meeting with Japanese Prime Minister ----------------- [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: We have become increasingly concerned about confidential information (dpr/position info curves validations/stress tests etc) being passed to Arthur Andersen for audit purposes over the Web to their Arthur Andersen email addresses. (necessary now they no longer have access to Enron's internal email system) Please use the folder described below when passing any info (that you would have concerns about if it was picked up by a third party) via the shared drive that has been set up for this specific purpose. Note: AA should also use the shared drive to pass info back if there are questions or the data needs updating. We should also consider the sensitivity of audit findings and special presentations if they are being distributed electronically. Please pass this note to others in your groups who have the need to pass info back and forth. Details on how to access for those who will use this method to pass info: A secured folder has been set up on the o drive under Corporate called Arthur_Andersen Please post all confidential files in this folder rather than emailing the files to their company email address. If you need access to this folder submit an eRequest through the IT Central site: Arthur Andersen will be able to retrieve these files for review with their terminal server access at the Three Allen Center location. Please contact Vanessa Schulte if you have any problems or questions Beth Apollo [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: PGE meeting -- identify alternatives Tom Hagen @ CSW Shockley would be avail on thurs or Fri or Lay [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Neither Ken nor Jeff are available. It would probably be better for one of you to speak anyway. Any interest? ----------------- [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: I agree with Rick. I know Jose is tied up on current business but his input will be important. To date we have been relying on legal analysis of required approvals etc. That information is essential but it is as you know about 10% of the issue. The far more critical considerations are how is the government likely to react on a political level and what can we do about it. I think our government affairs people are in the best position to make these assessments. ----------------- [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: per my voicemail ----------------- [/INST] Category: Document editing/checking(collaboration) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: ----------------- [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: fyi -- further distribute this message as you see fit. ----------------- [/INST] Category: Personal but in professional context(e.g., it was good working with you) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Ken was meeting with him the day before yesterday. I'm just waiting to hear back. Sherri Sera 03/13/2001 10:07 PM To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: organizational announcement Just saw the memo about Sanjay Diomedes and Jim. Guess David Haug is still around? SRS [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: calendar and meeting file ----------------- [/INST] Category: Empty message(due to missing attachment) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Eric - I think the release looks fine. Shelley -- I take it there are no affiliate issues here (or they have been fully vetted)? ----------------- [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: ----------------- [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Thanks. I was glad to do it and would do it again... next time my computer will work. I benefitted a great deal from what I heard from the group especially regarding the PRC. Roger Sumlin 03/23/2001 09:34 AM To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Gary P Smith/OTS/Enron@ENRON Wilson Barbee/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON Brian Schaffer/Corp/Enron@ENRON Ann Vaughn/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON Fran Fagan/OTS/Enron@ENRON Subject: Presentation at ETS HR Employee Meeting Steve . . . FYI -- we conducted a post-event survey on opinions about the HR employee meeting held last month and the HR management team thought you should know that participants rated your presentation very high. When asked what should be kept the same next time participants commented as follows about your presentation: I think a presentation from Corporate HR is of great value. Keep the presentations by the officers . . . to talk about the business. I liked having other people from ETS/Enron there to better understand the big picture and where Enron is going. Continue to bring in invited guests to keep the group apprised of Corporate activities. I liked the opportunity to hear both Stan and Steve--the field staff don't get as many opportunities to hear from corporate management. Visits by Steve Kean and Stan Horton. Their perspectives are very good . . . Clearly your participation provided much value to the group and we appreciate very much your taking the time to come meet with us and share information. You should expect that we'll be asking you to come back again! Regards - Roger [/INST] Category: Personal but in professional context(e.g., it was good working with you) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Preliminary congratulations!. Looks like a good plan. Keep me posted. Stephen D Burns@ENRON 07/19/2000 01:47 AM To: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES cc: Scott Bolton/Enron Communications@Enron Communications Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON Chris Long/Corp/Enron@ENRON (bcc: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES) Subject: BLM/Forest Service Right-of-Way Update The Senate voted on the Interior Appropriations Bill late yesterday. Our amendment passed which prevents either BLM or the Forest Service from enacting new fiber optic federal lands rights-of-way policies. The BLM made a last ditch effort to defeat this in the Senate but we had reached key Senators and staff and they got nowhere. Action now moves to Conference which for us means a focus on the House Conference members. Scott and I will spend the next 2 days meeting with the key Republicans in the House. We've already recruited the important Democrats. Interior Approps Subcommittee Chairman Regula remains opposed at least publicly but we think we can get other Members to swing him. We trust he'll come up with a sensible face saving compromise on his own eg formally beginning a review process with his Subcommittee having oversight -- at this point our language literally forbids BLM or Forest Service from even meeting to discuss the issue. We continue though on several other fronts: 1. We have the New Dems writing OMB on the issue and several Senators and Congressmen writing BLM and USFS 2. We've increased the pressure on the White House and are letting them know through very senior back door channels that in our opinion BLM/Forest Service have not gotten the message. Our position is that we'll be satisfied that they've changed their evil ways when the new assessment on the Mt. Hood EBS build is retracted. 3. We're preparing both Senate and House authorizing Committees for the longer-term issue next session. We have no trouble finding champtions eager to own the issue 4. We're engaging the Western Caucus for same 5. Our adhoc coalition continues to grow in numbers and clout with over 20 companies and associations now actively engaged. Enron chairs this initiative with a tangible side benefit being much increased visibility and stature as a serious communications player. 6. Scott is successfully engaging state and local officials to weigh in from the end-user perspective BLM is on the retreat and has asked for a meeting which we've refused. We don't think they've given up though and it's likely an issue of pride at this point. So until the Approps process concludes we're continuing with the full court press. Steve [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: I think this is a good idea. We may want to think about CNBC as well. Brandon -- any technical obstacles? Margaret/Cindy -- how does the link work? does it go straight to the clip or do users have to navigate within CNN's site? ----------------- [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: ----------------- [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: What do you think he'll add? Jeff Dasovich Sent by: Jeff Dasovich 10/13/2000 11:01 AM To: skean@enron.com cc: Subject: Legal Analysis on AB 1890 I think it would be a good idea to have Ron Carroll in Watkiss' shop to do a parallel analysis to what we're going to have Mike Day do. Ron's very good and has done much work on these sortrs of issues. You comfortable with that? [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Steve ? This is a draft of the contact list I promised you.? There are still some typos in it.? I will clean them up and get send you a draft in the morning that is ready for circulation. ? This list is made?up of?people that I know?and trust.? By an large I have excluded sitting pubic officials.? In cases where a given organization has several useful contacts with similar knowledge I have listed just one person for now. ? Give me a call at your convenience and we can discuss this in great detail. ? Kevin 213-926-2626 - Kevin Scott - Key Contacts - Draft.doc [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Although I don't yet have all the facts Steve Hall said that late yesterday (Friday) afternoon the Governor exercised eminent domain over the IOU forward contracts that the PX had been in the process of auctioning to pay PX participants. I would like Bracewell to research at least the following two possible ways this action is unlawful. First this violates the banking provisions of the PX tariff (Section 6). These provisions requires the PX to hold all PX accounts in trust for PX participants. Second these are wholesale contracts and the State only has the right to exercise eminent domain concerning retail service. I don't have any law to support the second idea but think it should be researched nonetheless. [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: I mentioned the need to call Gramm in the exec committee meeting today and Ken is willing to do it. The talking points ISDA sent looked fairly generic. Given Ken's relationship and the fact that he has talked to Gramm previously on the subject what should we ask Ken to cover? I'd like to give him a background document and talking points like we did last time. I will send it by fax to you Chris and would appreciate it if you could update it as appropriate. [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Probably not. Let's communicate Breathitt's interest to Bone and stay out of it for now. Richard Shapiro 08/16/2000 08:42 AM To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES cc: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES Subject: Re: Bill Massey Is this the right time to weigh ? Steven J Kean 08/16/2000 06:56 AM To: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES Subject: Re: Bill Massey I believe we should back Massey as well. Who do we weigh in with now? Joe Hartsoe@ENRON 08/15/2000 08:27 AM To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES cc: Subject: Bill Massey Steve/Rick/Jim --- Talked to John Anderson yesterday. He had just gotten off the phone with Massey. Massey believes Linda B. is spending time at the White House lobbying to be Chair. Have we decided whether to back either and if so which? I would prefer backing Massey. Thoughts? JOE 202.466.9150 ----------------- [/INST] Category: Personal but in professional context(e.g., it was good working with you) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: who knows. I can't imagine that a customer would somehow owe insurance to the provider's employees. Michelle [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: cc:Mail to Bruce Stram and Tim Vail sent 6/23. Tim Vail is confirmed Bruce will be here until 10:00. [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: I'm afraid we have our work cut out for us. We have been working the proces at the state and federal level in the past couple of weeks. I continue to believe (hope) Susan J Mara 08/11/2000 11:56 AM To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES cc: Subject: CA Price caps I heard you've been raising a ruckus about our activities on the price caps -- asking us to do more. Thanks. I feel as if I have been a voice in the wilderness for the past six months when I was trying to get people to pay attention to the bad things happening in CA and warning that the problems (mainly a threat of reregulation) will spread elsewhere. [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: meeting folder ----------------- [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: (Connie Burns in Bill Hogan's office 617-495-1318) Lunch will be served. [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: ----------------- [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: I may need to spend some time with you in advance but you don't have to plan on coming here. Mark Schroeder@ECT 10/15/2000 06:32 PM To: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@ENRON cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron Beverley Ashcroft/LON/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: EBR - Public Affairs - Nov. 6 trust my non-attendance is okay with Steve. If not please so advise or if he wants my participation by conference call that could be arranged. thanks mcs Maureen McVicker@ENRON 12/10/2000 09:52 To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT Michael Terraso/OTS/Enron@ENRON Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron John David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON Katherine Brown/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron Cindy Derecskey/Corp/Enron@Enron Marcia A Linton/NA/Enron@Enron Beverley Ashcroft/LON/ECT@ECT Laura Glenn/OTS/Enron@ENRON Helen Kay Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: EBR - Public Affairs - Nov. 6 The EBR (Executive Business Review) for Public Affairs has been rescheduled: The new date is: DATE: Monday Nov. 6 TIME: 8:30 A.M. (block 2 hours on your sched just in case) PLACE: EB 50M03 ATTENDEES: Dave Delainey (if schedule permits) John Hardy Steve Kean Ken Lay Elizabeth Linnell Mark Palmer Mark Schroeder (will not be attending) Rick Shapiro Jeff Skilling Jim Steffes Mike Terraso [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: I'd like to get about 30 minutes with Mark just to catch up. Mark Schroeder@ECT 07/27/2000 07:47 AM To: Elizabeth Linnell/HOU/EES@EES Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES cc: Maureen McVicker/HOU/EES@EES Beverley Ashcroft/LON/ECT@ECT Subject: trip to Houston I expect to be in Houston next Monday from 1300 until Tuesday around 1500. If any of you wish to meet please have Maureen work with Beverley toput something in the diary. Elizabeth - if you do not mind I think if we just sit down for a few hours this will be the best way to assure that Iget you timely and accurate budget info so can we book something? thanks mcs [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Lou -- Dist Gen issue LEFF Nicki Daw -- 011-44-171-316-5457 9/25 - Cy knows to hold off on scheduling more meetings until further notice. Senator Bumpers with Harry McPherson - 2:30 3:30 Senator Crapo Cynthia will do other meetings trying for Pallone Gorton Grams. You can leave on 5:10 flight. [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: CANCELLED...... [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Kevin Thanks. I am becoming an old man. Vince [/INST] Category: Purely Personal |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: ----------------- [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: I'll do it. I saw Steve Reynolds (the govs assistant) today and told him I would do it. I have a lot of respect for Geringer. I may try to persuade them that they should reach out to FERC and Congress as a state that sees the need for a federal role in transmiission and encourages FERC to act. Any background you have would be most appreciated. From: Susan M Landwehr on 05/20/2001 09:35 PM To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron Subject: Re: Gov Geringer meeting Steve--unfortunately I really do need you to do this one. Steven J Kean 05/17/2001 12:04 PM To: Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: Re: Gov Geringer meeting I'd prefer to skip. How big of a problem would that be? From: Susan M Landwehr on 05/14/2001 03:09 PM To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT Subject: Gov Geringer meeting Steve/RIck ---as you may be aware Governor Geringer personally asked Ken Lay to come to the kick off meeting of the Wyoming Energy Task Force a group that was created by legislative mandate last month. The meeting is on May 30th in Cheyenne. Mr. Lay told the Governor that he would not be able to make it on that date but promised that a senior Enron exectutive would be there. I spoke with Governor Geringer's staff person again this past week and was hoping that Paul Kaufman could be the senior executive but no such luck (unless you give Paul a huge new title!). In talking with Maureen I understand that you have a previous conflict Steve but I am hoping that you can review your calendar to see if you could make an adjustment in order to meet the request of the Governor. Your speech would be in the morning--I've been told about 9 o clock or so---which would allow for you to leave by noonish. I [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: This morning the FERC had its meeting to discuss events in California and = =20 the FERC=01s response to them. The following is a summary of the remarks o= f=20 the four Commissioners and the major points of what has been ordered:=20 ? Major features ? 1.? Proposes to replace ISO and PX boards with independent non-stakeholde= r=20 boards. 2.? Continued significant role for the presidents of PX/ISO who should be= =20 made voting members. 3.? Elimination of mandated buy-sell requirement for the IOUs (although no= =20 explanation as to whether this requires CPUC action). Over-reliance on spo= t=20 markets has been problematical. 4.? As an independent exchange the PX will be free to design the products= =20 desired by the market. 5.? The proposed price modification measure will be a temporary measure.= =20 Single price for all offers below $150. However no bid above $150 will se= t=20 the price for all generators. A seller can bid anything it wants. Allowing = =20 generators to receive their as-bid price will allow high-cost generators to= =20 participate in the market. However the generator will be required to=20 provide confidential reports to FERC explaining the necessity for bids ove= r=20 $150 through 12/31/02. 6.? The order requires forward scheduling of 95% of an scheduling =20 coordinator=01s schedule with a penalty applied for deviations which exce= ed 5%=20 As an incentive the proceeds of the penalties go to the schedulers who=20 comply with the tolerance band. 7.? Rejects the purchase price caps proposed by the ISO. The order would= =20 eliminate the ISO=01s price cap authority. 8.? Beginning 1/1/01 the prospect of refunds will be available. =20 ? Commissioner Hebert ? Due to a technical problem when I called in I heard only part of his =20 remarks. He announced that he will have a separate concurrence in the order= =20 but is troubled by some of its features. The $150 cap is questionable=20 whether described as a Soft cap or as a hard cap. His concern is that it will clearly discourage new investment in generatio= n.=20 He therefore recommended that the $150 cap should be escalated on a regula= r=20 basis (perhaps every six months) until it reaches at least $250.=20 ? He points out that the ISO and PX are required to make RTO filings to FERC = =20 on 1/16/01. These filings should address the major aspects of the Order=20 issued today.=20 ? Hebert also questioned the issue of refunds alleging that it was =20 disingenuous to suggests that refunds were a possible remedy.=20 ? Commissioner Breathitt=20 ? Breathitt announced almost all of the foregoing major points of the orderT= he=20 order is based on a market approach. In choosing our market-based approac= h=20 it is our goal to guide the markets to self-correct and not re-institute= =20 command and control regulation.? We have all worked too hard too long t= o=20 have this result. ? Commissioner Massey ? Sixty-five years ago the Congress decreed that prices had to be just and = =20 reasonable.? There is no exception for market-based approaches. He will =20 concur as the order does find that prices have been unjust and=20 unreasonable. The order does insure that prices should return to being jus= t=20 and reasonable. Cited Frank Wolak as proposing there ought to be an 18-24= =20 month forward product designed which the CPUC will years ago federal law= =20 dictated that prices had to be just and reasonable. The $150 is a soft cap and allows a generator to bid above it but if it= =20 does it will not set the price which other generators receive. He invites = =20 comments on this issue.=20 With regard to retroactive refunds the Office of the General Counsel has= =20 prepared a legal memorandum which concludes that the FERC probably does not= =20 have authority to order refunds retroactively for any date before October 2= =20 2000. Invites comments on this issue.=20 California needs new generation and transmission and the siting authority= =20 belongs to the state. California must do its part to ensure that customers= =20 do in fact benefit from competitive markets that ensure just and=20 reasonable prices.=20 He is not yet confident that the Commission has taken all necessary steps.= =20 ? Chairman Hoecker ? He strongly supports the order.=20 Comments are due in three weeks. This is no time to pull punches. He cited= =20 the San Diego hearings as indicating that California markets were? out o= f=20 synch with the needs of the digital economy.? For FERC regulators who are= =20 used to corporate struggles among utilities and other large companies th= is=20 was a real eye-opener.=20 Average citizens had no warning this was going to happen and they had no= =20 competitive alternatives. It was unfair to them and there is plenty of = =20 responsibility for this meltdown to go around.=20 If I was a senior citizen in San Diego living on a fixed income or a sma= ll=20 business owner living on a small profit margin or a school administrator = =20 dealing with a tight budget the doubling of my bill would make me want my= =20 money back or to at least ensure that this won=01t happen again in the= =20 future. Many who expected this order expected a lynching and the transfer of lar= ge=20 amounts of money. They want us to round up the bad guys who manipulated th= e=20 market and order the disgorgement of their ill-gotten gains. As our legal= =20 opinion indicates that=01s not going to happen.? Today=01s order offer= s a=20 thoughtful way back to a rational basis for buying and selling power in th= e=20 West. We are not ignoring actual or undue discrimination or actual abuses of =20 market power. The order makes better market monitoring going forward a =20 fundamental part of FERC=01s proposal.? If evidence of such behavior is = =20 brought forward FERC will act on that information. However we can=01t d= elay =20 work on a market fix while searching for the culpable parties.=20 Hoecker believes that strong federal action is both warranted and =20 important at this moment.? The bulk power grid must be made to work =20 efficiently across the entire West.=20 Competition is at risk make no mistake about that. In view of the =20 California experience several states are reconsidering or shelving plans t= o =20 implement competition.? Legislators will want to retain the possibility of= =20 returning to the old days of vertically-integrated utilities.? The =20 California experience has been instructive but not helpful=01(to the=20 meandering implementation of competition throughout the nation.=20 The state=01s markets have not been mistakenly federalized as alleged b= y=20 some. The markets are regional. California=01s access to interstate power = =20 supplies is critical as was made evident by recent events. If we do things= =20 right California will not be a federal enclave designed to satisfy our=20 market predilections it will be a workable and competitive market that=20 benefits consumers.=20 This is a strong order. It needs to be a strong order. We expect to have = a=20 strong order in December and the public needs it.=20 A copy of these notes are attached if you need to distribute them to anyon= e=20 in your organizations. - November 1 2000 Meeting Notes.doc [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: I think you or someone in your group should cover this. The attendees are operations focussed and may be interested in issues such as siting interconnection and environmental issues. Also from a more macro perspective what kinds of demands the new industry structure may place on operators -- the importance of flexibility in asset operations (ie the premium the market will place on quick response) or the challenges of different scheduling regimes between the gas and power markets. ----------------- [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: This one is due Monday! Lots of notice. Sue Mara Enron Corp. Tel: (415) 782-7802 Fax:(415) 782-7854 [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: ----------------- [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Thanks for the update. Congratulations on your progress. Keith Miceli@ENRON 07/24/2000 04:18 PM To: Steven J Kean@EES Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON Karen.Denne@enron.com cc: Karen.Denne@enron.com Subject: Re: Chorety Crisis Steve and Mark: I arrived in the US on Saturday with a good feeling about what appears to be a successful resolution of the Chorety crisis. Under Steve Hopper's leadership the Chorety spill became a non-issue by Friday. During the crisis I collaborated with my counterpart from Shell/London Michael Megarry in developing a Key Messages and Internal Q&As document (attached). At the daily meeting/conference call there was an Operations Report from the site an analysis of the day's newspaper articles (which I handled) and discussions on how to respond to media that were reporting or airing inaccurate information that was damaging Transredes' image. I also developed a Stakeholders Action Plan (attached) for the Incident Commander to use in organizing and monitoring team member actions taken in response to stakeholder concerns. The Plan was updated daily by the Transredes PR Office and given to team members prior to every meeting/conference call. The Stakeholder Report is intended to complement the Operations Report. I also want to acknowledge the support of Karen and Dennis during the early stages of the crisis. It was extremely helpful. Regards Keith [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Thanks The same to you. Vince [/INST] Category: Document editing/checking(collaboration) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: ----------------- [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Great news. With respect to the Commissoners I think it makes sense to go back through Ellen and ask if she could set up meetings with a few commissioners ater the staff briefing. wgramm <wgramm@osf1.gmu.edu> on 07/17/2001 03:23:19 PM Please respond to <wgramm@osf1.gmu.edu> To: Jerry Ellig <jellig@gmu.edu> Steve Kean <skean@enron.com> cc: Susan Dudley <SDudley@gmu.edu> Subject: FERC course on for Thurs July 26 1-4 p.m. Susan got it done -- it'll be Thursday July 26 1-4 p.m. at FERC (a room on the 3rd floor?). Susan has talked with Bill Albrecht. He'll probably be coming in on Wed. p.m. Steve any ideas about a Commissioner strategy? (invite them to attend if the FERC folks agree ask the FERC folks to do the inviting ask the FERC folks to help set up meetings afterwards or a follow on if they like what we do and think it useful for Commissioners try to do a walkaround -- that is offer to have Jerry Bill Susan visit commissioners individually Friday a.m. after the course or Thursday a.m. before the course?) Wendy Wendy Gramm Regulatory Studies Program Mercatus Center George Mason University 703-993-4884 [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: David As we discussed Mark Haedicke and I discussed the possibility of providing Kevin McConville with some sort of indemnity in order to make sure that he remains available and cooperative during the pendency of the NSM case and other litigation matters. We could agree to enter into a Consulting Services Agreement with Kevin. The terms of that Agreement would include: 1. He agrees to be available and cooperative with Enron and its counsel regarding litigation matters. He will agree to meet with counsel prepare for testimony review documents testify and provide other assistance as needed. 2. Through February 1 2001 Kevin would not be directly compensated for this cooperation/testimony (because he is to be receiving his salary pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement). After Feb.1 2001 he will be paid a rate of $125 per hour for his services in this regard. 3. Enron would agree to indemnify Kevin for his conduct taken in the ordinary course and scope of his employment with Enron up to the last date of his employment with Enron. Excluded from this indemnity would be allegations or claims based upon the following: -- any conduct that is outside the course and scope of Kevin's employment -- any conduct violating policies of Enron or ENA -- Kevin's intentional acts -- Kevin's gross negligence -- Kevin's reckless conduct -- conduct that is in violation of any law statute regulation or other legal obligation or -- the commission of an unlawful or illegal act. 4. Kevin would invoice Enron for time spent in performing the services after 2/1/01. The invoice would be paid within 30 days of receipt. In addition all related expenses would be reimbursed throughout the term of the agreement. Let me know if you have any questions or require additional information. I am available to participate in your call with him if you would like me to attend. Michelle [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: This is an issue we need to stay on top of. Felicia: could you please put= =20 some background together for everyone on the list? [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: I kept your contact list but now I can't find the CV you sent. Would you mind resending? Kevin Scott on 06/20/2001 02:02:00 PM Please respond to kevinscott@onlinemailbox.net To: Steve Kean <skean@enron.com> Jeff Skilling <jeff.skilling@enron.com> cc: Subject: Public Policy Contacts for California Jeff and Steve ? As you requested I have prepared a list of my preferred public policy contacts?for California.? It is composed of professionals from an array of public private and non-profit backgrounds.? I have worked in some capacity with?each of these people?and most I know quite well.? ? Please call me for further background. ? Kevin 213-926-2626 ? Attachment - Kevin Scott - Preferred Contacts - 6-20-01.doc [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: TASK ASSIGNMENT Task Priority: Task Due On: 4/16/2001 Task Start Date: [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Please handle ----------------- [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: How are we handling these now? Last time I talked to Jeff we weren't going to lift the restrictions until next week (assuming we do lift the restrictions). Any word? ----------------- [/INST] Category: Employment arrangements(job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Do you guys follow these reports? Do we need to correct them? [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: We have got to do better at this. IR did a webcast of the annual meeting that from all reports had a minimum of glitches. Can we use the same technology? Courtney Votaw 03/13/2001 09:10 AM To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Mary Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON Erin Rice/Corp/Enron@Enron Subject: All-Employee Meeting Report I have attached a success report of the streaming communications vehicles we used for the All Employee meeting on Feb. 21 2001. The report includes information about the following: Video Teleconference Audio and Video quality Viewing employees IP-TV Statistics Successes of the locations streamed Video Requests Quantity by location and group To improve access and increase the employee's viewing experience at future meetings we are working with the IP-TV technical team to find solutions to the problems that occurred in February. From the employee feedback we received we will plan to send slides in advance to the video teleconference locations. Please let me know if you have any questions regarding this report. Thanks Courtney [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: You should also check my folder California - working group ----------------- [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: A typical utility luncheon. ----------------- [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: testing [/INST] Category: Empty message |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: FYI [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Thanks for the thoughts. I fully agree on BF costs and DWR costs. I believe that you are right on Est RT$ = CAISOM Imbalance but I need to check. On the question of retroactive ratemaking it is my understanding that you are correct. PG&E probably won't rebill but will need to put in place an adjustment to the going forward PX Credit to collect the overpayment of Negative CTC. All of this means that the impact of the FERC refund is less than 100c on the $ for the Negative CTC. Jim [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Hey -- you're talking about our future President! I am soooo looking forward to my next Biennial Resource Planning proceeding. ----------------- [/INST] Category: Purely Personal |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Another question. What about a Continental flight to Amsterdam and from Amsterdam to Warsaw? I can also fly Continental through Rome or London as long as I don't have to change airports. Vince [/INST] Category: Purely Personal |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Yes thanks. Lay is going to be giving the keynote. It may be a hard story to assemble: the gas market is deregulated and structured pretty much the way we would like to see it done in both gas and power markets yet we still have high prices. It's a bit of a stretch to blame it all on OPEC. I'm interested in any views you may have. David Haug@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT 09/01/2000 10:30 PM To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: The Governors' Natural Gas Summit: Responding to the Challenge I assume you are involved in this but just in case... - - -DLH ----------------- [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: So why did the ISO make the attachments confidential if it does not believe that they are confidential. If the attachments are to be released they should be released to everyone. How do we make that happen? Sue Mara Enron Corp. Tel: (415) 782-7802 Fax:(415) 782-7854 [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: A memo is coming out shortly. From: Rod Hayslett/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/30/2001 08:42 AM To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: Analyst PRC Where can I go to find out what is required of me for the upcoming Analyst PRC? Rod Hayslett EB4054 713-853-6178 [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: please print [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Diane Russell Saunders (Polaroid) RFP for fuel oil and no.6 (617) 386-7301 [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: can you fill this out for me? [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: I am working on an analysis of the details of the Barton draft RTO language. While it is highly objectionable and our goal is to kill it to do so we need to respond to requests to be specific about why we don't like it. One of the more objectionable provisions says that FERC can't change the scope governance etc. of any RTO that has been approved under Order 2000 prior to enactment of the legislation. If this applies to PJM the legislation would stop the Northeast-wide RTO in its tracks since several of you and PJM's Phil Harris testified last week that FERC has approved PJM. By contrast committee staff and the section-by-section they distributed on the RTO legislative proposal say that to date FERC has NOT approved any RTOs under Order 2000. They say that the legislative language would not apply to any RTO as of this date because FERC approvals of PJM Cal ISO and NePool have been approved under the ISO principles of Order 888. Your thoughts on the above would be helpful. Either way I think we can argue that the provision shows why the Barton proposal is a retrenchment rather than an advancement on RTOs. If it does not apply to PJM and the others as they contend there is no good reason to include it other than to freeze the process at FERC merely by having the legislation pending on the Hill much less enacted into law. [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: I wuold like to attend if my calendar is open ----------------- [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Fyi [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: I'll give 150. Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp. From: Jeff Skilling 04/19/2001 05:18 PM Sent by: Sherri Sera To: Cliff Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT Rick Buy/HOU/ECT Ben Glisan/HOU/ECT@ECT Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron Jeffrey Sherrick/Corp/Enron Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT Michael Brown/NA/Enron Wade James A Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT Rebecca McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT Greg Piper/Corp/Enron John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT Janet R Dietrich/HOU/EES@EES Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES Matthew Scrimshaw/LON/ECT@ECT David Cox/Enron Communications@Enron Communications Kevin Hannon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron Stan Horton/Houston/Eott@Eott Danny McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: I know how incredibly busy you all are so I'm sure that making a pledge to Jeff for the MS150 has simply slipped your mind. Well the ride is this weekend time is running out and we need you! Enron's goal is to raise $700000 and Jeff's personal goal is to raise $50000. As of today we are a little better than half way there. Won't you consider helping him reach his goal? Thanks for your consideration. I look forward to hearing from you tomorrow... Sherri :-) [/INST] Category: Purely Personal |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Attached is the May 2001 At A Glance report. A couple of additions this month which include a section on Capital Expenditures with Pay Backs and some analysis of the recent new hire survey that we set up. Please call if you have any questions. DCL [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Let me know when and where. ----------------- [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: I like the idea particularly if we can time any decision to turn the customers back so it falls after the failure to get some action out of Sacto (instead of after our earnings release). The only problem I see is that we would need a decision from the top that we're not going to turn the customers back if we get direct access (so we can end the debate). I don't think it helps us if we get lucky get direct access back then make a decision to return customers to the utility. Karen Denne@ENRON 04/13/2001 10:30 AM To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES Subject: Re: CONFIDENTIAL - Residential in CA Before any decision is made I think we really need to weigh in with EES on the ramifications (both PR and legislative) of turning back 16000 residential customers. I strongly believe that the public hit we will take will be far greater than our actual out-of-pocket losses. We will be crucified by the public media consumer groups legislators governor attorney general etc. and this action will reaffirm our reputation of packing up and leaving when it's not in our interest. The impact of this action would be exacerbated since it is on the heels of UC/CSU. I would also argue that this hurts our national dereg efforts. If we're advocating that competition and choice benefits consumers and then we turn around and pull out of a market and abandon customers when we're not profiting we'll kill any chances we have of ever serving retail customers in California -- or in any other state. We look foolish advocating for direct access when we're not willing to serve our existing -- let alone future customers What about a preemptive strike that engages these 16000 customers to weigh in on direct access -- i.e. a letter that says Enron may be forced to cancel its contract -- call/write/send the enclosed postcard to your legislator and tell them you want to keep your right to choose your energy service provider. Our credibility is on the line. Before we take this action we need to be cognizant of all the long-range strategic implications and we need to seriously weigh the negative impact this will have on our corporate reputation on our legislative abilities and on our commercial success going forward. kd James D Steffes 04/12/2001 09:05 PM To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON Susan J Mara/NA/Enron Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES Subject: CONFIDENTIAL - Residential in CA In the meeting today no decision was made about what to do with Enron's 16000 residential customers. Each of the contracts gives a basic 30 day out right to Enron. That being said I think that we have a short window to push for DA before any public action impacts us in Sacramento. I realize that the ultimate action (which I think is inevitable) makes it harder for our advocacy on DA but real $ are flowing out of the company. EES will give us notice when a decision is reached. Thanks Jim [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: ----------------- [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: ----------------- [/INST] Category: Document editing/checking(collaboration) |