Datasets:

pietrolesci

/

wikitoxic

like 1

454db65d06b9946c

Total football was invented when english coaches came to Holland to coach dutch teams and the national team they introduced total football Rinus Michels carried it on please revert this correctly Jack Reynolds did let his team play total football and he was ajax coach in the 50's 20 years before Rinus Michels

0non

a40e63df1377867e

On shear good faith I concur 100% with Zac's last. This subject must accommodate opposing viewpoints; if it can't be done for some reason through cooperation, the subject would have to split into two articles the pseudo scientific form, and the intrinsic form. So what's it gonna be?

0non

8fdd96a4fa7094af

Bushytails|Bushytails]] 05:36, 30 January 2007

0non

1d507ef2c55fc2dd

Against democracy. Oeration Condor was an attemp to deter the democracy, no the marxism.

0non

3be2bfd44a38e819

It is not me you need to convince, take it to WP:ARAB or to WP:AMOS.

0non

7e5b339a27ff3669

Why are you being hard headed and reverting my edits, you've had your fun, but the article as it is stinks worse than spoiled cabbage. Why do you insist?

1tox

1b7b4f4e13c54849

I think either would be OK if you can back it up with an RS. Otherwise, the claim will seem to depend on original research.

0non

2b4f053f8e1dc6a7

" Thanks for clarifying that; I agree WP:BAN#Dealings with banned users says what you said (and that it's not in an obvious place; perhaps ""Proxying"" should have its own heading.) And I'm sorry that I questioned your judgment. Now, where would you draw the line between being ""tipped off,"" or pointed somewhere as Bmedley apparently was, and posting on another's behalf? Also, is this policy worded in an appropriate way if a banned user asks to have something included, does that really mean that all of the sudden everyone is forbidden from including it? If that were the case, a banned user could effectively censor just by asking to have the material he or she wishes to censor included. I'm sure that can not be the intent of the policy. ←BenB4 "

0non

3fc435d31fb0566d

" (four, double six, six four) Why not ""four, triple six, four""? Would it not be more logical and easier mnemonically? Too evil?"

0non

9b718c361048fd35

hey i think you are very right and btw my name is seth!

0non

18b741f94271084d

I have noted the change in the GO's rules. Thanks.

0non

31371f7e01c85b11

No, not at all. Although i'm sure their source would be Da Ali G Show, and i'm not quite sure that's a reputable source, although the DEA agent on the show with him tended to agree with the statement hahaha.

0non

7e2188fa558627f8

Image:Shai_up_close.jpg listed for deletion An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Shai_up_close.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. samaKReply? on my talk page, please

0non

4bbaea679ab8ffbe

arsehole I was right, you fuckwit

1tox

1dab0b76b699f4ae

" '''Look at this whole talk page! We can't even talk about the article without emphasising if we are for or against it. No you cant claim that there is only pro-circ pollution in there. There is anti-circ pollution in there also! Unfortunately the people writing up this article are focusing too much on ""negative aspects"" on this. They obviously never went to freewebs.com/pro-circ or circinfo.com or cirlcist.com These all show a pro side. I think that the majority want to put negatives in. We have have to put ""pros"" and ""negatives"" You guys need to stop arguing. The only reason why this is under so much heat is because it pertains to the male penis which is very important to men."""""

0non

74483537a594c662

Request for Closure I request consensus to close this RfC. It's been significantly less than 30 days, however, there has been a high degree of participation with ample discussion and it's clear (IMO) there will not be a consensus to delete the passage in question. Does anyone object?

0non

a5703ab95c3e74cc

You now online You now online, so answer here. This my last reminder.

0non

11d5d129546c0287

Inaccurate information Removed a section which claimed that Denning's novel Pages of Pain inspired the Planescape: Torment game, which is definitely not the case. Both have an amnesiac protagonist and that's about it. The novel is about the Lady of Pain and her background, whilst the computer game has very little to do with the Lady of Pain at all. Chris Avellone and none of the other Torment writers have mentioned the book as an influence at all.

0non

ff5911e7e846c977

" Ambarish Srivastava Ambarish Srivastava Good evening sir, above article Ambarish Srivastava was nominated for deletion review on 2010 February 14. The result of the discussion was moved to main space. You have participated in that discussion. It was thoroughly checked and edited by you also. I am grateful to you for your kind support at that time. At present Mr. 'SpacemanSpiff' who nominated this article for AFD previously, has deleted its major part under 'poetry' section which was cited properly. As well as he also deleted it's whole 'Architectural works' section on Yesterday 19:01, 16 December 2010 and 19:03, 16 December 2010. I contacted Mr. 'SpacemanSpiff' on his talk page where he answered to me ""You can not use photographs of buildings as references for works by the person, we need reliable source references. Likewise, user submitted content sites are not valid references for poetic contributions and linking to every poem on such sites runs afoul of our external links policy. Suggest you read WP:BLP and WP:NPOV"". If that content was not was as per WP:BLP and WP:NPOV then why he could not deleted it previously when this page was moved to main space, while Mr. 'Fayenatic london' has made some quarries about it on 18:46, 20 August 2010, 18:49, 20 August 2010,18:53, 20 August 2010, 18:58, 20 August 2010, 19:05, 20 August 2010 & 19:12, 20 August 2010. He was satisfied with my answers about those sections. I request you to check it. Is it justified? if not please help it. Thanks a lot. "

0non

52feebf1f3bb36ad

" ==WARNING: MEMBER THE WIKIPEDIAN GREEK NATIONALISTIC JUNTA. By User:Balkan == There’s a well collaborated (London based) group of GREEK Wikipedia sysops/users that has been spotted to work systematically in full daily basis propagandazing ultra natioanalistic Greek POV, and distorting related articles. They intervene in any Balkan history and politics related article, pushing Greek POV, launch edit wars, and repeated reverts of vandalized by them versions, permanent deletions, block users, merges and redirects to deletetion of undesired new articles. Their main target is to distort all articles lelated to ISLAM, TURKEY, REBUBLIC OF MACEDONIA, BULGARIA, ALBANIA (CHAMERIA), THEIR MINORITIES IN GREECE AND THEIR HISTORY. They attack every article criticizing Greece transforming it to Greekish propaganda POV. They became maniacs in optimizing dark side of Greek history.They communicate each other by secret e-mails avoiding messages through their talk pages to avoid publicity. This group acting in a systematic way to revert articles, when one of member makes the limit of 3 reverts, one another continues with 4th revert to avoid punishment for violating 3rv rule. Furthermore they are suspected agents of Greek National Intelligence Service (E.Y.Π. Κυπατζήδες) and believers of ultra nationalistic organizations of Greek “national interests”, as L.A.O.S. and Chrissi Avgi. They are also multiple sockpuppets and impersonators of their group members. They are all schizophrenics web vandals unacceptible to wikipedian community. Balkan history has labelled such people as GREKOMANS, a form of mental malignacy cited in Larousse dictionaries. Their illusion is MEGALI IDEA of Greek nationalism-expandism.They have been allied with Armenian, Serbian and Cypriot extremists of similar interest. THEY HAVE CONSTITUTED A WIKIPEDIAN GUNG, A GREEK PRAPAGANDA LOBBY, A GREEK EPSILON TEAM. All member of group are very radical nationalists. They work continously in three shifts over day and night. To verify chek their contributions, talk page, edits, deletions, blocks, directs, protected pages and act properly. Wikipedia isn’t the right place to propagandize for “God’s elit nations” as Greece. Members of gung involved: user:Khoikhoi sysop , He’s the chief-manager of group, recently probated by Wikipedia, suspected agent of Greek intelligence user:Future Perfect at Sunrise (sysop), GREEK, close collaborator of Khoikhoi user:Aldux (sysop), ), close collaborator of Khoikhoi user:Tekleni GREEK ,confirmed multiple sock puppet user:Telex,GREEK, confirmed sock puppet user:NikoSilver GREEK, close collaborator of Euthymios, vassal of KhoiKhoi user:Euthymios GREEK, confirmed collaborator of Khkoikhoi and Future Perfect at Sunrise user:Hectorian GREEKTAB user:Politis, GREEK user: AndreasJS GREEK, close collaporator of Khoikhoi and Aldux user:Miskin,GREEK user:mitsos GREEK "

0non

1b418e13d49114bb

" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Bill Gates. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. "

0non

f9343d979b3bba0c

That really is the final straw, and thoroughly dishonest of you to leave the personal attack to which I was responding. Fatuorum

0non

50bc322e17d11483

You NDP attack queers have a staggering aversion to the truth

0non

d9c4c0445af3610b

? Why dont you specify your gender?In your userbox you say any gender pronoun may apply to you.That doesnt make sense unless....ur u know....quee....ga....a fa...a hom......

0non

01fb885fd0a0c0fe

" {| width=""100%"" style=""background:transparent"" {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#"" |style=""width: 50%; border:1px solid #; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""| Hello Madstar890, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! —αἰτίας •discussion• {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#"" |style=""width: 50%; border:0; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""| Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Manual of Style |style=""width: 50%; border:0; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""| {| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""2"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#"" ! Getting help |- |style=""color:#000""| Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page |- !

0non

c4277915bc32ae78

List of names What is the relevant Style page for lists of people with a specific name, when such a list is too long to be included in a dab page?

0non

9399bc62e6759a11

" Freud's ideas are certainly much discussed today, and I would be the first to agree that they must be grappled with and dealt with seriously, if only because of their currency. So Freud deserves a long and thorough article in Wikipedia. I believe that a balanced article would include A) explanations of Freud's theories, and B) the status of Freudianism today. The existing article is quite thorough on ""A"" and had almost nothing on ""B"". A neophyte who read the article as it stood a month ago would imagine that Freud's work has the same relation to current psychology that Darwin's work has to current biology. Let's compare them: Darwinism thoroughly permeates modern biology, and his fundamentals, built on copious observation and collegial collaboration, now much extended with new data and new theories, continue to provide accurate predictions and fruitful avenues of exploration. Freud's fundamental ideas were founded on minimal and dubious observations, and his theories do not meet the test of being logical, minimal, reproducible explanations of the data. As far as Jung goes, I haven't gotten to him yet ), and I don't know anything about Maslow. Freud draws my fire precisely because he is so high profile, so influential, and so wrong. I was required to study The Interpretation of Dreams in high school as if it were scientific fact, and the disgust I felt when I later realized it was all as stupid as it sounded has turned me into - yes - a Freud critic. Of course, I am striving for NPOV. Do you really feel that presenting Freud's pseudoscience without comment is NPOV, whereas quoting one of many eminent critics is not? 21:55, 14 Sep 2003 (UTC)"

0non

5ef70b756993c8ce

November 2009 (UTC) It's difficult to see how my edits can be construed as disruptive or vandalism. As long as I am deliberately targeted by some editors, I will continue to respond. 04:06, 30

0non

2a68a035dc6a4c04

RE: A barnstar for you! Thank so much, I appreciate it!(:

0non

e87fc1114d43e4bc

I'm so glad you and a few other editors are so vigilant on this subject. I trust that you agree with me that the Foundation, if it is concerned about this subject, needs to adopt a Conflict of Interest policy. I agree with the view recently expressed by another editor that one can't crowdsource a COI policy. Are you on board, Mr. 2001?

0non

07a278c5588ab631

" Take a look at the Avatar the Last Airbender page on Wikipedia. There's a supposed live-action movie coming out, directed by that guy who directed ""Lady in the Water"" or whatever it was called. "

0non

535f1904b3b16f7e

Unit of account and unit of measure are used as synonyms in economics and accounting. However, unit of account has a very specific definition in accounting that is not unit of measure.

0non

7e40ecd7c3b332b4

" Split into two articles This article is in an odd state because it covers two completely separate projects—(1) HipHop for PHP or HPHPc, a PHP-to-C++ transcompiler, and (2) HHVM or the HipHop Virtual Machine, a PHP virtual machine—that share nothing other than part of their names and Facebook's sponsorship. I'd like to split the article; the current article would remain and describe the HipHop for PHP project consisting of the HPHPc transcompiler and HPHPi interpreter from its infancy in 2008 until its abandonment in 2013, but the content describing the virtual machine from its genesis in 2010 until the present would be moved to an article titled HHVM. Since the naming situation is fairly confusing, I've added some reference quotes below. Thoughts? — Primary (no parenthetical) names for these projects are bolded and suffixed with a number describing whether they refer to [1] the transcompiler or [2] the virtual machine. ""Today I'm excited to share the project a small team of amazing people and I have been working on for the past two years; HipHop for PHP[1]...We have also developed HPHPi which is an experimental interpreter designed for development.""—Facebook blog, Feb 2010 ""That’s how Facebook explains the significance of its new PHP executor, HipHop Virtual Machine[2]....HHVM[2] will improve the performance of Facebook’s code....Facebook originally deployed its open source HipHop for PHP[1] in February 2010.""—Techcrunch, Dec 2011 ""In late 2011 we announced that we were pursuing a just-in-time (JIT) compilation approach called HipHop VM[2] (HHVM) as a successor to the HipHop PHP-to-C++ compiler[1] (HPHPc)....We are happy to announce that HHVM[2] is now as fast as HPHPc[1].""—Facebook blog, Nov 2012 ""Facebook has been using the virtual machine, called the HHVM[2] (HipHop Virtual Machine), across all of its servers since earlier this year...Facebook originally devised a compiler, called HipHop[1], that would translate PHP code into C++...(The previous HipHop, renamed HPHPc[1], has now been retired within Facebook.)""—Javaworld, Jul 2013 ""In 2010, Facebook rolled out a tool called HipHop[1]...the trio agreed that Facebook could take PHP performance to an even higher level if they replaced HipHop with something called a virtual machine....In a nod to the company’s original PHP converter, they called the system the HipHop Virtual Machine[2], or HHVM[2] for short.""—Wired, Jul 2013 ""Facebook has also made great progress on its alternative open-source PHP engine, the HipHop Virtual Machine[2] (HHVM). HHVM[2] uses...""—O'Reilly Programming, Mar 2014 ""Hack runs only on Facebook’s HipHop virtual machine[2] (HHVM)....Should you start learning Hack and HHVM[2]? Yes.""—O'Reilly Programming, Apr 2014 ""HHVM[2] is an open-source virtual machine...""—HHVM official website "

0non

8638e0ea96581ad4

"*Well I cannot respond to this over at deletion review, but I think this comment speaks for itself and shows the kind of mindset I am dealing with: ""But the Silver medal, which is the award in this case, is ""a person under the age of 40 who is actively engaged in research and has, by way of international participation and publications, shown outstanding capability and achievement."" I do not think that confers notability I see the key phrase ""outstanding capability"" which often means Not Yet Notable. It's possible that an article directed to the scientific achievements might meet the standard, but it would need to be written by someone else"". To say that ""outstanding capability and achievement"" is not notable is, frankly, mind-boggling to say the least. I am just glad to be out of this mental asylum for now. "

0non

41066e08f3cd4a3a

" Notability response There is no way for me to prove the notability of the band by providing a link. The only ""reliable sources"" as you call them are some newspapers and posters in my city, but I don't know where to find them. The only thing I could provide is a video or a picture with the band performing. Would that be enough?"

0non

dece133d021adb75

" The borders of the new state were not specified. Changing from ""Borders for a new Jewish state were specified by the UN"" to ""The borders of the new state were not specified."" is a clear misrepresentation of the truth. The borders of the new state were specified by the UN. The borders specified by the UN were accepted by the Jewish Agency for Israel. To sum all this up in the lead with the statement ""The borders of the new state were not specified."" is completely dishonest. "

0non

9f0d278eabe564b4

, 24 December 2007 (UTC) You're very welcome. I suffer from the same excess of smartassery, so maybe it was easier for me to get the point. Ahh... life. Regards of the season to you as well. 19:01

0non

7d5c01310b9781b4

":::All articles can be FA in my mind. It says that all articles should of a good or featured status. I plan on taking that literally and make alot of articles FA just so they are at their best and not just passable. I don't give up. I still have a shit load of 2008 articles to get done which I'll probably have done this week. That extra time is going to help me out. I look forward to helping with Judgment Day.C "

0non

c8ad93c112209e70

Yes Sir If I need help in the future i will ask you and is it ok if I put you on my Users I'm cool with section on my talk page.

0non

4d25362c4afc4623

"::::::::By ""ID hypothesis"" I mean the assertion that it's possible to scientifically show that some sort of a god exists. I'm not saying that the hypothesis is testable... Dembski's ""explanatory filter"" only rules out other known explanations, it doesn't have a way to rule out design, and Behe's IC is simply an argument from ignorance... but there is a hypothesis (that you can scientifically prove the existence of God) which is intimately intertwined with, but is not identical to the wedge-drive ID movement. One can show that the ID hypothesis fails on philosophical and scientific grounds entirely on its own, which is far more powerful than saying that it fails simply because of the deceit and duplicitousness of the ID movement. "

0non

663301f1cb4b59e5

quick thing mate Give me a couple of reasons NOT to kill you plz. btw this is a shared IP adress on a school computer so don't even bother responding,

1tox

5209782ff922fe11

well . . . ok fine, but how is anything i said vandalism? i'm only speaking the truth

0non

fc9eaee8b7592727

" Seriously - myspace and Benzinga are valid references? Statements on TV are references? Or they are not? But not a single person who posts on Wikipedia and knows how to look at an easily found SEC filing to find the truth? We actually needed a ""debate""? Each and every person who posted either 1945 or 1955 has truly disappointed the readers of Wikipedia because of the failure to find and cite the obvious, instead relying on falsities if wrong (1945), or if correct (1955), on lousy non-primary information. Beachdrifter, you are one of the biggest jokes- more concerned about showing if there has been enough debate to qualify as ""considerable debate"" than finding an authoritative source to get the facts right."

0non

0c88373b4a0aac92

" The removed paragraph Slovakization is often rationalized as a response to forced magyarization, which happened mainly after the Ausgleich (Compromise of 1867). While no one now considers magyarization a positive trend, for several reasons the rationalization of slovakization as a response to it is questionable: magyarization happened during the times of the monarchy, and it happened in a time period when human rights were not considered nearly as universal as now. Slovakization is happening since then and it was as severe under communist dictatorship as it is now in democratic I have removed this paragraph, not because I would necessarily disagree, but because this is a speculative formulation (a ""POV"" in wikipedia terminology) not suitable for an encyclopaedia. If this was an undisputed topic, maybe such formulations could work, but since that is not the case, it is definitely better to stick to pure sourced data. "

0non

66c2fdc7ccdcfb84

RSPW As usual, he is wrong.

0non

2e9db474215d0099

"Should this be updated with the recent Wikileaks documents that show the United States was ""turning a blind eye"" to Iraqi-on-Iraqi torture and extrajudicial executions?"

0non

c505970de7960760

Personal opinion: That message above was very wierd.

0non

6f7656ecc97287e0

This article had previously been ridiculously swayed.... Came upon it while doing a report on anti-semitism from the right.... The current article reflects more upon who Joseph Sobran truly is... If he disagrees he should retract/change his positions.... -From the user known as CaliforniaDreamlings

0non

f3e503963cb706da

Did Softlavender pulled the tooth of the lion? Incredible.

0non

1b9d83ab1218c42b

Saw your article was up for speedy deletion, and just wanted to offer a suggestion as to how to combat it. Generally speaking, a personal site isn't accepted as the only mark of somebody's notability. A lot of people have personal sites, and they aren't notable for it. The best thing to do would be to find a couple of other sources about Hammond, talking about his project, and link those; newspaper articles work, as do gallery notices and exhibit reviews. If you have some kind of print source - an exhibition notice, or a catalogue with a bio - cite that as well. It's not as easily checked, but it's usually a good mark of notability. Hope this helps!

0non

91969f2298bacc09

(see bottom of this)

0non

434c06a6a4b34ca7

Very Nice work... Finaly someone has taken his time and wrote an article like this.

0non

9c490448479f0bcf

"If you like to ""squash IP addresses for fun"", then you'll never earn my respect and should not be at Wikipedia. Keep it in mind when you decide that calling me a vandal will hide your transgressions. My idols are among the Christian right. If you hate them and erase my Talk Page as you did my User Page, then you can go to Hell. Fred Phelps: * ""You can't preach the Bible without preaching hatred."" * ""God doesn't hate them because they're fags; they're fags because God hates them."" * ""Fag Jew Nazis are worse than ordinary Nazis. They've had more experience. Jews stirred up the Romans to butcher 6 million Christians in the catacombs in the 1st century. The First Holocaust was a Jewish Holocaust against Christians. The latest Holocaust is by Topeka Jews against WBC."" * ""Anybody babbling about 'multicultural affairs' and 'celebrating diversity' is a propagandist for the militant sodomite agenda...Westboro Baptists will picket this black obfuscator, in religious protest and warning. Being black won't get you to Heaven. But promoting fags will take you to Hell."" * ""Homosexuals now pervade and control American government at every level and branch. Thus, only those churches that support and promote the militant homosexual agenda enjoy religious freedom. Any church in America that dares to preach what the Bible says about soul-damning, nation-destroying moral filth of the vile homosexual beasts among us, loses all Constitutional guarantees of religious freedom and speech rights."" * ""We understand that Iraq is the only Muslim state that allows the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ to be freely and openly preached on the streets without fear of arrest and prosecution. Alas, the United States no longer allows the Gospel to be freely and openly preached on the streets, because militant sodomites now control our government, and they violently object to the Bible message...The same majoritarian sodomite tyranny that now guides the Clinton administration's repressive policies toward Gospel preaching on America's streets, is apparently responsible at least in part for the merciless slaughter by starvation of 400 innocent Iraqi babies each day in your country. If our government and laws will allow it, and at the invitation of your government, we would like to send a delegation from Westboro Baptist Church in Topeka, Kansas, to preach the Gospel on the streets of Baghdad for one week in the near future."" * ""Filthy sodomites crave legitimacy as dogs eating their own vomit & sows wallowing in their own feces crave unconditional love."" * ""Fag priests and dyke nuns is the order of the day for Kansas Catholics. They deserve the sick, perverted leadership that now dooms and damns them."" Pat Robertson: * ""We have allowed rampant secularism and occult, et cetera, to be broadcast on television. We have permitted somewhere in the neighborhood of 35 to 40 million unborn babies to be slaughtered in our society. We have a Court that has essentially stuck its finger in God's eye and said, 'We're going to legislate you out of the schools, we're going to take your Commandments from off the courthouse steps in various states, we're not going to let little children read the Commandments of God, we're not going to let the Bible be read no prayer in our schools.' We have insulted God at the highest levels of our government. And, then we say 'why does this happen?' Well, why its happening is that God Almighty is lifting His protection from us."" * ""Satan has gone! God has just healed somebody! A hernia has been healed! Several people are being healed of hemorrhoids and varicose veins! People with flat feet! God is doing just great things to you!"" * ""It's appalling to me that we would debate over $14 million... one attempt to dislodge a communist dictatorship in Central America causes Congress to go into a tizzy over $14 million in aid. There's something wrong with our sickly government, in my humble opinion."" * ""CBN is helping starving and displaced persons in 15 countries, including some in Central America. The help is absolutely non-political. Articles claiming support by CBN of the Contras in Nicaragua are incorrect."" * ""The fact is that the Communists make people suffer. If that makes it political, then, I'm sorry, we're still going to help them."" * ""When I said during my presidential bid that I would only bring Christians and Jews into the government, I hit a firestorm. ""What do you mean?"" the media challenged me. ""You're not going to bring atheists into the government? How dare you maintain that those who believe in the Judeo-Christian values are better qualified to govern America than Hindus and Muslims?"" My simple answer is, ""Yes, they are."""" * ""[Planned Parenthood] is teaching kids t

0non

df4786a78369920f

Hi Vellella - I see that you removed my link to Oceana Group (the finshing comapny)... I do not see what is wrong with such a link. We are creating a perfectly legitimate page about a company, and we want a link to it. Don't you have anything better to do?\

0non

7903cc05a5e53a5c

" Hi David, may I ask, did you post this at Jossi's request? Are you someone who's ever edited the Rawat articles? I think I recall a David at some point. Was that you? In any event, while I agree with the general point that editors shouldn't be ""hunted down"" etc., is that really a fair way to characterize my asking an editor if he's ever been a paid publicist for the article's subject? Do you think that's an irrelevant question, especially in light of Jimbo Wales' saying just the other day that ideally articles shouldn't be edited by interested parties but that it was hard to know who was who given the ease with which people can be anonymous? Besides, Jossi's not anonymous, is he? Sorry, but I find this confusing. Wales says Wikipedia's a free speech forum, Jossi says it isn't. It's all too subtle for me, I'm afraid. "

0non

8bc69d97f3fc543d

And your Frieser is unreliable. He will ctiticed even by german historians. His infos are funny even fpr german propaganda.

0non