Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
instance_id
int64
0
47
num_jobs
int64
6
12
num_machines
int64
2
5
solve_time
float64
0.38
1.28
instruction
stringclasses
1 value
input
stringlengths
480
2.88k
output
stringlengths
73
123
0
6
2
0.4033
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 6 Jobs, 2 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=95, M1=52 Job 1: M0=39, M1=24 Job 2: M0=46, M1=88 Job 3: M0=53, M1=97 Job 4: M0=13, M1=61 Job 5: M0=37, M1=89 === Setup Times === [Machine 0] J0: [41,3,29,30,1] J1: [12,3,39,7,14] J2: [3,2,5,49,29] J3: [3,24,29,21,15] J4: [33,7,6,39,1...
Solution: M0: Job4 β†’ Job2 β†’ Job1 β†’ Job5 M1: Job0 β†’ Job3 Makespan: 164.0
1
6
2
0.3924
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 6 Jobs, 2 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=80, M1=56 Job 1: M0=34, M1=13 Job 2: M0=12, M1=11 Job 3: M0=52, M1=10 Job 4: M0=27, M1=63 Job 5: M0=99, M1=85 === Setup Times === [Machine 0] J0: [9,21,44,28,29] J1: [4,26,38,45,49] J2: [20,8,30,1,28] J3: [20,42,6,7,27] J4: [3,39,30,9...
Solution: M0: Job2 β†’ Job4 β†’ Job0 M1: Job3 β†’ Job5 β†’ Job1 Makespan: 133.0
2
6
2
0.3996
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 6 Jobs, 2 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=95, M1=15 Job 1: M0=37, M1=28 Job 2: M0=61, M1=27 Job 3: M0=13, M1=80 Job 4: M0=96, M1=41 Job 5: M0=21, M1=42 === Setup Times === [Machine 0] J0: [15,11,47,5,33] J1: [44,37,11,23,10] J2: [15,19,7,27,34] J3: [49,38,35,12,25] J4: [34,18...
Solution: M0: Job1 β†’ Job3 β†’ Job5 M1: Job0 β†’ Job4 β†’ Job2 Makespan: 125.0
3
6
3
0.3843
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 6 Jobs, 3 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=93, M1=88, M2=28 Job 1: M0=75, M1=25, M2=59 Job 2: M0=38, M1=13, M2=85 Job 3: M0=59, M1=79, M2=91 Job 4: M0=62, M1=38, M2=38 Job 5: M0=24, M1=89, M2=69 === Setup Times === [Machine 0] J0: [9,36,13,24,11] J1: [7,21,47,34,9] J2: [47,48,...
Solution: M0: Job5 β†’ Job3 M1: Job1 β†’ Job2 M2: Job4 β†’ Job0 Makespan: 101.0
4
6
3
0.382
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 6 Jobs, 3 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=36, M1=92, M2=56 Job 1: M0=74, M1=47, M2=27 Job 2: M0=17, M1=74, M2=16 Job 3: M0=37, M1=24, M2=85 Job 4: M0=37, M1=42, M2=35 Job 5: M0=34, M1=39, M2=80 === Setup Times === [Machine 0] J0: [21,40,10,46,44] J1: [6,24,37,19,15] J2: [29,3...
Solution: M0: Job2 β†’ Job0 M1: Job3 β†’ Job5 M2: Job1 β†’ Job4 Makespan: 82.0
5
6
3
0.3823
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 6 Jobs, 3 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=19, M1=62, M2=51 Job 1: M0=62, M1=61, M2=21 Job 2: M0=99, M1=55, M2=31 Job 3: M0=98, M1=26, M2=50 Job 4: M0=13, M1=72, M2=11 Job 5: M0=16, M1=91, M2=67 === Setup Times === [Machine 0] J0: [24,9,48,43,1] J1: [34,27,21,32,36] J2: [15,47...
Solution: M0: Job4 β†’ Job0 β†’ Job5 M1: Job2 M2: Job3 β†’ Job1 Makespan: 89.0
6
6
4
0.6716
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 6 Jobs, 4 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=54, M1=99, M2=90, M3=91 Job 1: M0=37, M1=12, M2=68, M3=34 Job 2: M0=88, M1=51, M2=41, M3=33 Job 3: M0=37, M1=94, M2=29, M3=67 Job 4: M0=47, M1=51, M2=46, M3=21 Job 5: M0=94, M1=49, M2=53, M3=42 === Setup Times === [Machine 0] J0: [11,...
Solution: M0: Job0 M1: Job5 M2: Job2 β†’ Job3 M3: Job4 β†’ Job1 Makespan: 81.0
7
6
4
0.6814
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 6 Jobs, 4 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=68, M1=100, M2=98, M3=30 Job 1: M0=81, M1=80, M2=44, M3=19 Job 2: M0=53, M1=82, M2=57, M3=97 Job 3: M0=91, M1=74, M2=28, M3=51 Job 4: M0=56, M1=18, M2=14, M3=63 Job 5: M0=41, M1=51, M2=98, M3=78 === Setup Times === [Machine 0] J0: [14...
Solution: M0: Job2 M1: Job5 M2: Job4 β†’ Job3 M3: Job0 β†’ Job1 Makespan: 59.0
8
6
4
0.6645
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 6 Jobs, 4 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=70, M1=46, M2=65, M3=47 Job 1: M0=58, M1=15, M2=19, M3=41 Job 2: M0=15, M1=58, M2=73, M3=78 Job 3: M0=27, M1=67, M2=32, M3=51 Job 4: M0=47, M1=19, M2=33, M3=60 Job 5: M0=94, M1=58, M2=73, M3=35 === Setup Times === [Machine 0] J0: [20,...
Solution: M0: Job2 β†’ Job3 M1: Job0 M2: Job1 β†’ Job4 M3: Job5 Makespan: 66.0
9
6
5
0.6836
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 6 Jobs, 5 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=68, M1=68, M2=16, M3=98, M4=51 Job 1: M0=61, M1=70, M2=10, M3=79, M4=77 Job 2: M0=30, M1=60, M2=78, M3=67, M4=100 Job 3: M0=35, M1=36, M2=94, M3=44, M4=23 Job 4: M0=51, M1=23, M2=58, M3=17, M4=54 Job 5: M0=86, M1=90, M2=61, M3=42, M4=3...
Solution: M0: Job2 M1: Job3 β†’ Job4 M2: Job1 M3: Job5 M4: Job0 Makespan: 66.0
10
6
5
0.6966
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 6 Jobs, 5 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=93, M1=80, M2=46, M3=63, M4=21 Job 1: M0=32, M1=71, M2=59, M3=71, M4=28 Job 2: M0=78, M1=52, M2=67, M3=55, M4=85 Job 3: M0=73, M1=27, M2=16, M3=25, M4=96 Job 4: M0=11, M1=12, M2=64, M3=89, M4=70 Job 5: M0=60, M1=49, M2=20, M3=97, M4=26...
Solution: M0: Job1 M1: Job4 β†’ Job3 M2: Job5 M3: Job2 M4: Job0 Makespan: 55.0
11
6
5
0.6835
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 6 Jobs, 5 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=63, M1=29, M2=39, M3=12, M4=17 Job 1: M0=95, M1=85, M2=27, M3=95, M4=92 Job 2: M0=55, M1=98, M2=54, M3=26, M4=47 Job 3: M0=77, M1=54, M2=24, M3=86, M4=30 Job 4: M0=93, M1=61, M2=87, M3=42, M4=77 Job 5: M0=99, M1=29, M2=56, M3=33, M4=63...
Solution: M0: Job2 M1: Job4 M2: Job1 M3: Job0 β†’ Job5 M4: Job3 Makespan: 61.0
12
8
2
0.4772
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 8 Jobs, 2 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=87, M1=74 Job 1: M0=27, M1=69 Job 2: M0=79, M1=58 Job 3: M0=91, M1=16 Job 4: M0=84, M1=97 Job 5: M0=31, M1=71 Job 6: M0=52, M1=28 Job 7: M0=46, M1=48 === Setup Times === [Machine 0] J0: [34,5,31,4,36,30,23] J1: [19,22,45,38,47,18,48] ...
Solution: M0: Job5 β†’ Job7 β†’ Job2 β†’ Job1 M1: Job4 β†’ Job6 β†’ Job0 β†’ Job3 Makespan: 238.0
13
8
2
0.4694
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 8 Jobs, 2 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=33, M1=92 Job 1: M0=77, M1=33 Job 2: M0=45, M1=84 Job 3: M0=28, M1=81 Job 4: M0=89, M1=36 Job 5: M0=24, M1=93 Job 6: M0=93, M1=69 Job 7: M0=69, M1=64 === Setup Times === [Machine 0] J0: [5,34,42,33,39,42,30] J1: [5,3,37,10,23,21,46] J...
Solution: M0: Job0 β†’ Job1 β†’ Job2 β†’ Job5 β†’ Job3 M1: Job6 β†’ Job7 β†’ Job4 Makespan: 225.0
14
8
2
0.4829
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 8 Jobs, 2 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=94, M1=44 Job 1: M0=38, M1=22 Job 2: M0=82, M1=57 Job 3: M0=76, M1=83 Job 4: M0=22, M1=28 Job 5: M0=79, M1=72 Job 6: M0=92, M1=28 Job 7: M0=100, M1=36 === Setup Times === [Machine 0] J0: [10,6,18,26,22,18,27] J1: [30,31,10,4,1,14,40] ...
Solution: M0: Job1 β†’ Job5 β†’ Job3 β†’ Job4 M1: Job2 β†’ Job6 β†’ Job0 β†’ Job7 Makespan: 219.0
15
8
3
0.4692
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 8 Jobs, 3 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=75, M1=42, M2=79 Job 1: M0=20, M1=39, M2=80 Job 2: M0=19, M1=94, M2=25 Job 3: M0=21, M1=83, M2=30 Job 4: M0=89, M1=94, M2=29 Job 5: M0=93, M1=57, M2=86 Job 6: M0=90, M1=28, M2=13 Job 7: M0=16, M1=23, M2=19 === Setup Times === [Machine...
Solution: M0: Job1 β†’ Job0 M1: Job7 β†’ Job5 M2: Job4 β†’ Job6 β†’ Job3 β†’ Job2 Makespan: 113.0
16
8
3
0.4824
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 8 Jobs, 3 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=45, M1=42, M2=81 Job 1: M0=43, M1=90, M2=72 Job 2: M0=62, M1=55, M2=50 Job 3: M0=88, M1=29, M2=77 Job 4: M0=52, M1=48, M2=22 Job 5: M0=87, M1=73, M2=48 Job 6: M0=21, M1=44, M2=23 Job 7: M0=14, M1=51, M2=73 === Setup Times === [Machine...
Solution: M0: Job5 β†’ Job1 M1: Job7 β†’ Job3 β†’ Job0 M2: Job6 β†’ Job2 β†’ Job4 Makespan: 139.0
17
8
3
0.4784
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 8 Jobs, 3 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=40, M1=37, M2=35 Job 1: M0=23, M1=86, M2=79 Job 2: M0=90, M1=89, M2=24 Job 3: M0=68, M1=52, M2=80 Job 4: M0=41, M1=18, M2=97 Job 5: M0=88, M1=31, M2=67 Job 6: M0=96, M1=31, M2=18 Job 7: M0=73, M1=36, M2=95 === Setup Times === [Machine...
Solution: M0: Job1 β†’ Job7 M1: Job5 β†’ Job3 β†’ Job4 M2: Job6 β†’ Job2 β†’ Job0 Makespan: 112.0
18
8
4
0.8706
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 8 Jobs, 4 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=37, M1=55, M2=89, M3=56 Job 1: M0=76, M1=51, M2=81, M3=14 Job 2: M0=99, M1=45, M2=29, M3=67 Job 3: M0=82, M1=14, M2=60, M3=26 Job 4: M0=97, M1=49, M2=79, M3=59 Job 5: M0=44, M1=71, M2=59, M3=61 Job 6: M0=28, M1=89, M2=63, M3=18 Job 7: ...
Solution: M0: Job5 β†’ Job7 M1: Job0 β†’ Job3 M2: Job6 β†’ Job2 M3: Job4 β†’ Job1 Makespan: 98.0
19
8
4
0.8811
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 8 Jobs, 4 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=17, M1=71, M2=21, M3=60 Job 1: M0=54, M1=52, M2=29, M3=20 Job 2: M0=10, M1=83, M2=96, M3=61 Job 3: M0=81, M1=11, M2=43, M3=88 Job 4: M0=95, M1=32, M2=70, M3=92 Job 5: M0=83, M1=55, M2=66, M3=75 Job 6: M0=49, M1=86, M2=12, M3=49 Job 7: ...
Solution: M0: Job2 β†’ Job7 M1: Job3 β†’ Job4 M2: Job1 β†’ Job0 β†’ Job6 M3: Job5 Makespan: 78.0
20
8
4
0.8666
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 8 Jobs, 4 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=69, M1=31, M2=41, M3=41 Job 1: M0=82, M1=100, M2=48, M3=62 Job 2: M0=27, M1=87, M2=22, M3=20 Job 3: M0=56, M1=12, M2=86, M3=81 Job 4: M0=59, M1=23, M2=86, M3=37 Job 5: M0=61, M1=18, M2=30, M3=98 Job 6: M0=19, M1=35, M2=92, M3=54 Job 7:...
Solution: M0: Job4 β†’ Job6 M1: Job3 β†’ Job0 M2: Job5 β†’ Job1 M3: Job2 β†’ Job7 Makespan: 90.0
21
8
5
0.8817
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 8 Jobs, 5 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=24, M1=41, M2=39, M3=93, M4=38 Job 1: M0=40, M1=37, M2=88, M3=83, M4=42 Job 2: M0=33, M1=17, M2=86, M3=49, M4=10 Job 3: M0=100, M1=72, M2=83, M3=84, M4=88 Job 4: M0=59, M1=24, M2=53, M3=20, M4=97 Job 5: M0=79, M1=92, M2=97, M3=39, M4=4...
Solution: M0: Job7 β†’ Job1 M1: Job3 M2: Job6 β†’ Job0 M3: Job4 β†’ Job2 M4: Job5 Makespan: 80.0
22
8
5
0.8823
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 8 Jobs, 5 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=64, M1=95, M2=55, M3=49, M4=29 Job 1: M0=57, M1=63, M2=49, M3=57, M4=96 Job 2: M0=71, M1=39, M2=45, M3=65, M4=37 Job 3: M0=31, M1=62, M2=92, M3=98, M4=32 Job 4: M0=50, M1=91, M2=35, M3=13, M4=99 Job 5: M0=60, M1=63, M2=70, M3=31, M4=19...
Solution: M0: Job7 β†’ Job6 M1: Job2 M2: Job1 M3: Job4 β†’ Job5 M4: Job3 β†’ Job0 Makespan: 67.0
23
8
5
0.8904
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 8 Jobs, 5 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=67, M1=18, M2=79, M3=90, M4=50 Job 1: M0=76, M1=64, M2=31, M3=78, M4=49 Job 2: M0=49, M1=18, M2=46, M3=42, M4=24 Job 3: M0=38, M1=35, M2=96, M3=59, M4=14 Job 4: M0=48, M1=53, M2=53, M3=45, M4=23 Job 5: M0=49, M1=77, M2=78, M3=55, M4=50...
Solution: M0: Job5 M1: Job0 M2: Job1 M3: Job7 β†’ Job6 M4: Job3 β†’ Job4 β†’ Job2 Makespan: 68.0
24
10
2
0.5836
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 10 Jobs, 2 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=72, M1=40 Job 1: M0=86, M1=71 Job 2: M0=97, M1=35 Job 3: M0=10, M1=20 Job 4: M0=67, M1=57 Job 5: M0=97, M1=36 Job 6: M0=72, M1=82 Job 7: M0=32, M1=97 Job 8: M0=97, M1=48 Job 9: M0=79, M1=74 === Setup Times === [Machine 0] J0: [12,18,...
Solution: M0: Job7 β†’ Job4 β†’ Job1 β†’ Job6 M1: Job9 β†’ Job3 β†’ Job8 β†’ Job0 β†’ Job2 β†’ Job5 Makespan: 314.0
25
10
2
0.5682
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 10 Jobs, 2 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=90, M1=57 Job 1: M0=34, M1=18 Job 2: M0=71, M1=96 Job 3: M0=93, M1=34 Job 4: M0=11, M1=22 Job 5: M0=50, M1=22 Job 6: M0=47, M1=64 Job 7: M0=55, M1=60 Job 8: M0=87, M1=75 Job 9: M0=18, M1=65 === Setup Times === [Machine 0] J0: [11,18,...
Solution: M0: Job7 β†’ Job8 β†’ Job9 β†’ Job2 M1: Job4 β†’ Job6 β†’ Job1 β†’ Job0 β†’ Job5 β†’ Job3 Makespan: 253.0
26
10
2
0.5831
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 10 Jobs, 2 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=88, M1=72 Job 1: M0=32, M1=63 Job 2: M0=97, M1=23 Job 3: M0=69, M1=42 Job 4: M0=14, M1=88 Job 5: M0=86, M1=34 Job 6: M0=54, M1=50 Job 7: M0=50, M1=53 Job 8: M0=62, M1=85 Job 9: M0=52, M1=88 === Setup Times === [Machine 0] J0: [28,2,3...
Solution: M0: Job1 β†’ Job3 β†’ Job8 β†’ Job9 β†’ Job4 M1: Job5 β†’ Job7 β†’ Job0 β†’ Job6 β†’ Job2 Makespan: 269.0
27
10
3
0.5708
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 10 Jobs, 3 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=18, M1=48, M2=57 Job 1: M0=36, M1=53, M2=17 Job 2: M0=16, M1=44, M2=38 Job 3: M0=82, M1=84, M2=70 Job 4: M0=32, M1=66, M2=59 Job 5: M0=34, M1=47, M2=54 Job 6: M0=38, M1=93, M2=88 Job 7: M0=70, M1=22, M2=39 Job 8: M0=16, M1=70, M2=60 J...
Solution: M0: Job8 β†’ Job4 β†’ Job0 β†’ Job6 M1: Job3 β†’ Job9 β†’ Job7 M2: Job1 β†’ Job5 β†’ Job2 Makespan: 154.0
28
10
3
0.5952
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 10 Jobs, 3 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=37, M1=95, M2=30 Job 1: M0=84, M1=87, M2=56 Job 2: M0=48, M1=57, M2=26 Job 3: M0=66, M1=84, M2=83 Job 4: M0=94, M1=62, M2=85 Job 5: M0=91, M1=69, M2=58 Job 6: M0=14, M1=56, M2=43 Job 7: M0=60, M1=15, M2=26 Job 8: M0=15, M1=37, M2=83 J...
Solution: M0: Job0 β†’ Job3 β†’ Job8 β†’ Job6 M1: Job4 β†’ Job1 M2: Job2 β†’ Job9 β†’ Job5 β†’ Job7 Makespan: 162.0
29
10
3
0.5847
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 10 Jobs, 3 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=27, M1=58, M2=53 Job 1: M0=43, M1=70, M2=40 Job 2: M0=29, M1=55, M2=43 Job 3: M0=55, M1=83, M2=65 Job 4: M0=29, M1=85, M2=26 Job 5: M0=10, M1=18, M2=77 Job 6: M0=59, M1=12, M2=97 Job 7: M0=62, M1=16, M2=90 Job 8: M0=36, M1=86, M2=32 J...
Solution: M0: Job5 β†’ Job0 β†’ Job3 M1: Job9 β†’ Job2 β†’ Job7 β†’ Job6 M2: Job1 β†’ Job8 β†’ Job4 Makespan: 135.0
30
10
4
1.0654
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 10 Jobs, 4 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=54, M1=17, M2=46, M3=29 Job 1: M0=49, M1=41, M2=46, M3=40 Job 2: M0=48, M1=40, M2=76, M3=63 Job 3: M0=33, M1=90, M2=92, M3=98 Job 4: M0=22, M1=68, M2=61, M3=67 Job 5: M0=39, M1=29, M2=83, M3=73 Job 6: M0=45, M1=95, M2=10, M3=47 Job 7:...
Solution: M0: Job2 β†’ Job3 M1: Job7 β†’ Job0 β†’ Job8 β†’ Job5 M2: Job6 β†’ Job4 M3: Job9 β†’ Job1 Makespan: 94.0
31
10
4
1.0667
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 10 Jobs, 4 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=11, M1=22, M2=31, M3=71 Job 1: M0=49, M1=43, M2=16, M3=61 Job 2: M0=67, M1=50, M2=36, M3=13 Job 3: M0=68, M1=21, M2=14, M3=26 Job 4: M0=21, M1=93, M2=45, M3=48 Job 5: M0=19, M1=14, M2=53, M3=64 Job 6: M0=41, M1=62, M2=24, M3=52 Job 7:...
Solution: M0: Job0 β†’ Job4 β†’ Job7 M1: Job5 β†’ Job9 β†’ Job1 M2: Job2 β†’ Job6 M3: Job8 β†’ Job3 Makespan: 82.0
32
10
4
1.0661
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 10 Jobs, 4 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=14, M1=87, M2=88, M3=42 Job 1: M0=85, M1=33, M2=94, M3=14 Job 2: M0=23, M1=65, M2=21, M3=45 Job 3: M0=33, M1=27, M2=36, M3=54 Job 4: M0=71, M1=71, M2=56, M3=67 Job 5: M0=15, M1=83, M2=94, M3=13 Job 6: M0=59, M1=96, M2=94, M3=22 Job 7:...
Solution: M0: Job0 β†’ Job4 M1: Job3 β†’ Job8 β†’ Job9 M2: Job2 β†’ Job7 M3: Job6 β†’ Job5 β†’ Job1 Makespan: 106.0
33
10
5
1.0839
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 10 Jobs, 5 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=99, M1=90, M2=39, M3=41, M4=98 Job 1: M0=56, M1=31, M2=71, M3=28, M4=67 Job 2: M0=32, M1=41, M2=11, M3=97, M4=21 Job 3: M0=48, M1=30, M2=47, M3=36, M4=15 Job 4: M0=90, M1=67, M2=95, M3=60, M4=68 Job 5: M0=18, M1=11, M2=40, M3=63, M4=5...
Solution: M0: Job6 β†’ Job8 M1: Job9 β†’ Job5 β†’ Job7 M2: Job2 β†’ Job0 M3: Job1 β†’ Job3 M4: Job4 Makespan: 71.0
34
10
5
1.0824
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 10 Jobs, 5 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=98, M1=24, M2=52, M3=81, M4=80 Job 1: M0=16, M1=66, M2=48, M3=18, M4=45 Job 2: M0=69, M1=25, M2=92, M3=34, M4=12 Job 3: M0=99, M1=86, M2=99, M3=98, M4=86 Job 4: M0=17, M1=60, M2=64, M3=98, M4=99 Job 5: M0=59, M1=59, M2=42, M3=46, M4=7...
Solution: M0: Job1 β†’ Job6 β†’ Job4 M1: Job0 β†’ Job5 M2: Job7 β†’ Job9 M3: Job3 M4: Job2 β†’ Job8 Makespan: 98.0
35
10
5
1.0845
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 10 Jobs, 5 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=82, M1=73, M2=13, M3=44, M4=44 Job 1: M0=98, M1=22, M2=54, M3=18, M4=74 Job 2: M0=99, M1=67, M2=77, M3=61, M4=22 Job 3: M0=60, M1=67, M2=24, M3=53, M4=11 Job 4: M0=14, M1=74, M2=83, M3=76, M4=35 Job 5: M0=79, M1=99, M2=40, M3=40, M4=9...
Solution: M0: Job8 β†’ Job4 M1: Job1 M2: Job9 β†’ Job0 M3: Job5 β†’ Job7 M4: Job6 β†’ Job2 β†’ Job3 Makespan: 65.0
36
12
2
0.6868
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 12 Jobs, 2 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=92, M1=47 Job 1: M0=86, M1=25 Job 2: M0=91, M1=61 Job 3: M0=93, M1=52 Job 4: M0=44, M1=25 Job 5: M0=40, M1=80 Job 6: M0=53, M1=90 Job 7: M0=34, M1=99 Job 8: M0=19, M1=50 Job 9: M0=17, M1=22 Job 10: M0=80, M1=63 Job 11: M0=10, M1=47 =...
Solution: M0: Job7 β†’ Job3 β†’ Job6 β†’ Job11 β†’ Job5 β†’ Job8 M1: Job1 β†’ Job10 β†’ Job2 β†’ Job0 β†’ Job9 β†’ Job4 Makespan: 284.0
37
12
2
0.6831
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 12 Jobs, 2 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=49, M1=37 Job 1: M0=62, M1=32 Job 2: M0=22, M1=90 Job 3: M0=67, M1=20 Job 4: M0=11, M1=70 Job 5: M0=97, M1=72 Job 6: M0=93, M1=69 Job 7: M0=94, M1=37 Job 8: M0=72, M1=49 Job 9: M0=38, M1=90 Job 10: M0=34, M1=26 Job 11: M0=49, M1=12 =...
Solution: M0: Job0 β†’ Job9 β†’ Job10 β†’ Job2 β†’ Job4 β†’ Job8 M1: Job6 β†’ Job5 β†’ Job7 β†’ Job1 β†’ Job11 β†’ Job3 Makespan: 281.0
38
12
2
0.6821
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 12 Jobs, 2 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=26, M1=87 Job 1: M0=69, M1=77 Job 2: M0=33, M1=12 Job 3: M0=69, M1=64 Job 4: M0=23, M1=59 Job 5: M0=65, M1=83 Job 6: M0=32, M1=68 Job 7: M0=46, M1=17 Job 8: M0=15, M1=89 Job 9: M0=40, M1=11 Job 10: M0=89, M1=45 Job 11: M0=41, M1=45 =...
Solution: M0: Job6 β†’ Job5 β†’ Job8 β†’ Job4 β†’ Job3 β†’ Job0 M1: Job2 β†’ Job10 β†’ Job7 β†’ Job1 β†’ Job9 β†’ Job11 Makespan: 262.0
39
12
3
0.6673
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 12 Jobs, 3 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=66, M1=24, M2=99 Job 1: M0=49, M1=31, M2=98 Job 2: M0=34, M1=75, M2=99 Job 3: M0=84, M1=83, M2=78 Job 4: M0=89, M1=60, M2=58 Job 5: M0=88, M1=83, M2=69 Job 6: M0=72, M1=76, M2=90 Job 7: M0=39, M1=45, M2=22 Job 8: M0=68, M1=32, M2=66 J...
Solution: M0: Job10 β†’ Job2 β†’ Job9 β†’ Job6 M1: Job0 β†’ Job8 β†’ Job3 β†’ Job1 M2: Job7 β†’ Job4 β†’ Job5 β†’ Job11 Makespan: 205.0
40
12
3
0.6831
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 12 Jobs, 3 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=63, M1=32, M2=27 Job 1: M0=48, M1=19, M2=37 Job 2: M0=86, M1=27, M2=24 Job 3: M0=87, M1=86, M2=42 Job 4: M0=81, M1=72, M2=23 Job 5: M0=99, M1=29, M2=15 Job 6: M0=88, M1=30, M2=22 Job 7: M0=74, M1=89, M2=86 Job 8: M0=97, M1=55, M2=22 J...
Solution: M0: Job0 β†’ Job7 β†’ Job9 M1: Job11 β†’ Job2 β†’ Job6 β†’ Job1 M2: Job8 β†’ Job3 β†’ Job4 β†’ Job5 β†’ Job10 Makespan: 178.0
41
12
3
0.6832
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 12 Jobs, 3 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=35, M1=70, M2=81 Job 1: M0=67, M1=55, M2=48 Job 2: M0=26, M1=79, M2=66 Job 3: M0=33, M1=77, M2=13 Job 4: M0=23, M1=84, M2=11 Job 5: M0=82, M1=53, M2=34 Job 6: M0=67, M1=16, M2=57 Job 7: M0=52, M1=58, M2=48 Job 8: M0=75, M1=22, M2=52 J...
Solution: M0: Job2 β†’ Job10 β†’ Job0 β†’ Job1 M1: Job6 β†’ Job8 β†’ Job9 M2: Job3 β†’ Job7 β†’ Job11 β†’ Job4 β†’ Job5 Makespan: 168.0
42
12
4
1.2804
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 12 Jobs, 4 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=62, M1=30, M2=95, M3=77 Job 1: M0=25, M1=37, M2=80, M3=76 Job 2: M0=97, M1=12, M2=80, M3=18 Job 3: M0=90, M1=41, M2=61, M3=67 Job 4: M0=85, M1=79, M2=22, M3=68 Job 5: M0=91, M1=38, M2=85, M3=58 Job 6: M0=14, M1=99, M2=10, M3=49 Job 7:...
Solution: M0: Job0 β†’ Job6 β†’ Job1 M1: Job5 β†’ Job11 β†’ Job7 M2: Job3 β†’ Job4 β†’ Job9 M3: Job2 β†’ Job8 β†’ Job10 Makespan: 125.0
43
12
4
1.2686
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 12 Jobs, 4 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=24, M1=29, M2=99, M3=27 Job 1: M0=20, M1=15, M2=57, M3=35 Job 2: M0=92, M1=35, M2=54, M3=92 Job 3: M0=45, M1=59, M2=38, M3=93 Job 4: M0=39, M1=30, M2=92, M3=41 Job 5: M0=67, M1=75, M2=63, M3=12 Job 6: M0=95, M1=62, M2=65, M3=36 Job 7:...
Solution: M0: Job1 β†’ Job8 β†’ Job0 M1: Job10 β†’ Job4 β†’ Job11 M2: Job3 β†’ Job9 β†’ Job2 M3: Job5 β†’ Job6 β†’ Job7 Makespan: 129.0
44
12
4
1.2813
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 12 Jobs, 4 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=11, M1=93, M2=91, M3=62 Job 1: M0=80, M1=79, M2=72, M3=22 Job 2: M0=59, M1=37, M2=76, M3=79 Job 3: M0=35, M1=98, M2=58, M3=39 Job 4: M0=57, M1=99, M2=81, M3=16 Job 5: M0=61, M1=97, M2=16, M3=17 Job 6: M0=13, M1=94, M2=50, M3=16 Job 7:...
Solution: M0: Job3 β†’ Job10 β†’ Job0 M1: Job9 β†’ Job8 β†’ Job2 M2: Job5 β†’ Job7 M3: Job4 β†’ Job6 β†’ Job11 β†’ Job1 Makespan: 130.0
45
12
5
1.2707
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 12 Jobs, 5 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=56, M1=83, M2=62, M3=60, M4=96 Job 1: M0=88, M1=33, M2=83, M3=12, M4=33 Job 2: M0=20, M1=98, M2=79, M3=92, M4=28 Job 3: M0=73, M1=32, M2=64, M3=38, M4=26 Job 4: M0=51, M1=34, M2=19, M3=38, M4=30 Job 5: M0=70, M1=68, M2=96, M3=95, M4=1...
Solution: M0: Job0 M1: Job4 β†’ Job11 β†’ Job7 M2: Job8 β†’ Job6 M3: Job10 β†’ Job1 β†’ Job9 M4: Job5 β†’ Job3 β†’ Job2 Makespan: 77.0
46
12
5
1.2815
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 12 Jobs, 5 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=45, M1=13, M2=36, M3=43, M4=50 Job 1: M0=99, M1=83, M2=90, M3=41, M4=89 Job 2: M0=70, M1=76, M2=48, M3=75, M4=95 Job 3: M0=64, M1=17, M2=70, M3=87, M4=81 Job 4: M0=10, M1=63, M2=51, M3=30, M4=44 Job 5: M0=28, M1=81, M2=63, M3=58, M4=5...
Solution: M0: Job7 β†’ Job10 β†’ Job4 M1: Job9 β†’ Job3 β†’ Job11 M2: Job2 β†’ Job6 M3: Job1 β†’ Job5 M4: Job0 β†’ Job8 Makespan: 109.0
47
12
5
1.2534
Solve the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem (PMSP) to minimize makespan, considering sequence-dependent setup times.
PMSP with 12 Jobs, 5 Machines. Minimize Makespan. === Processing Times === Job 0: M0=86, M1=82, M2=82, M3=90, M4=71 Job 1: M0=71, M1=39, M2=57, M3=50, M4=70 Job 2: M0=50, M1=22, M2=96, M3=70, M4=87 Job 3: M0=57, M1=25, M2=24, M3=63, M4=45 Job 4: M0=99, M1=76, M2=47, M3=84, M4=84 Job 5: M0=94, M1=47, M2=70, M3=85, M4=1...
Solution: M0: Job2 β†’ Job11 M1: Job9 β†’ Job1 β†’ Job3 M2: Job6 β†’ Job4 M3: Job8 β†’ Job10 β†’ Job7 M4: Job5 β†’ Job0 Makespan: 121.0

No dataset card yet

Downloads last month
8