Datasets:

tarekziade

/

profanity

like 2

" Thanks. I'm not crazy about the ""arbitration exemption"" either. Arbitrators can be given whatever they need by email. "

Another example of Rd232's abusive edit

suitable topic for debate, we would have easily won.

Basic bitches everywhere

Chapter 8 footnote 168 and 168 WCR RPJ

Let me know! Please let me know, that why you went so harsh and passed negatives comments upon me, while disussing the deletion of Salim Saifullah Khan? Please let me know!

@jaaaaaade__ Shut up. And miss you too fag

" I've made further changes in response to some of your comments. The motivation for restoring the original text is that it allows the article to lead with a clear definition and attribution, rather than a very indirect characterization. Let me remind you to assume good faith instead of claiming ""sabotage and active mmisinformation [sic]"" . Al "

" Yeah, OMG I saw it right now. Awesome, she is getting iconic. Yeah I saw ) I expected it. Also expected number 1 in Scotland, but ... Oh, alright, I will move it, let me just check first. ) — (T2ME) "

" You said that according to Lawson and Sloane, Resolution 567 referred to ""“self-determination” as a minority in a nation-state"". The link I provided to the resolution shows that it says no such thing and Lawson and Sloane do not make that claim. Perhaps you were confusing the resolution with something else. And I did not say ""a territory cannot exist"" in a nation-state or a federal republic. Clearly it can as an ""incorporated territory."" Both Canada and Australia have incorporated territories for example. (Although they are not technically ""republics"".) Obviously if a country has territories, it will exercise some degree of jurisdiction over them and may allow them some degree of self-government, but that does not incorporate them. "

The Book of Mormon Entry in this article is stated as though it is a truthful historical claim with historical backing. But since the Book of Mormon is not an widely accepted source of historical information it must be considered that this part of the entry may be false.

@CsSalazar15 see bro pussy changes you 😂😂😭😏😏

I trust that TheOldJacobite is also blocked then, like before, for his 3 reverts of my content , or is there one rule for one and one for others? Also I'd like to Mark Arsten on the admin team to review the page concerned as he has previously had TheOldJacobite blocked for his behaviour towards new editors and for the very allegations that David Biddulph claims against me.

" I continue to disagree. Other articles demonstrate that it is entirely possible to have readable, easy-to-use tables with sufficient numbers of columns to display results for all the parties under discussion. They also show techniques to deal with parties sometimes being reported and sometimes not, and sometimes being reported together. There is no need for the opinion polling table to be so abbreviated. Thus, we should reflect what the citations say. If polls are released that lump everyone other than the four biggest parties as ""other"", that's fine we report ""other"". If polls are released that give results for the Greens, BNP etc., then we should report those. We should be doing our best to avoid a situation where we are in danger of original research: I understand the 'cliff edge' argument, but that approach should be a last resort. We should take our lead from reliable sources, as always. The above IP user's further comments about the Israeli and Italian elections are erroneous on multiple accounts, but largely tangential to the discussion here. "

Hey I didn't come up with that Native Australian crap, and how does anti-Australian become racists/ethnocentrists if there's the Anglo-Saxons and there's the various WOGS in Australia, when did Australia become a 'race' or is it a One Nation dream with Anglo-Saxons?

" I'm nearly certain that Scott Thornton didn't become an alternate captain until Craig Conroy was traded to Calgary. I sure can't recall him wearing the ""A"" on his jersey before that moment, and I also thought I heard on a Kings telecast shortly after the Conroy trade Bob Miller and Jim Fox talking about how he's now wearing the ""A"" on his jersey, leading me to believe that he assumed that role after the trade. I'm not gonna reflect my opinion in the article; I thought I'd leave a cimment here, first. '''''' "

Is there someone who can tell me how to download Maupiti Island, the full game ? im so tired of looking for it !!! please send me mail at ophelie_chiaraditofifi@hotmail.fr. Thank u in advance and have a nice day !

" So you think that something like feline animalism is an assertion? I don't think I'm making myself clear at all then / Your page says you have a BA in Philosophy - are you familiar with much philosophy of language? Perhaps you'll like seeing a more formal argument: Assertions are statements: things that can be true or false (cf ""is it raining?"", which is a question not a statement) A common, sensible, and relevant use of ID is ""we came about through intelligent design, not evolution"" That makes no sense if ID is a statement, so ID can't be a statement (cf ""we came about through one phenomenon, not the other"") If ID isn't a statement, then it can't be an assertion (QED) Where do I go wrong? ((Compare ID to lamps, Marxism, and Goldbach's conjecture: ""I assert [that] lamps"" makes no sense, because ""lamps"" can't be true or false. ""Marxism"" also can't be true or false. But ""every even integer greater than 2 can be written as the sum of two primes"" can be. The reason the lead sounds right is because that is the thing that supporters of ID often assert.)) T "

" Plus or minus. If a player is on the ice and his team gets scored against, he gets a -. If he is on the ice and his team scores, he gets a +. The league average is around -1, and the leader is around +38.  (Talk)  "

"This book has released. I think it should have a seperate article. This book is Distinct from the book ""The Immortals of Meluha"""

" There is no need for the term ""militant"" in this context. There already exists satisfactory terminology for this sort of thing. Terrorists are civilians who attack civilians. Partisans are civilians who organize and fight soldiers. Soldiers are government employed fighters. 'Militant', honestly, could mean any of those things."

" December 2008 Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. hi! If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings."

I guess this is the new reality in the post Barrack Hussien Obama world. (I voted for Barrack H. Obama for Senate and President by the way.) I really truly want some guidance about this. What shoudl I do in the future?

Let me say this and make it perfectly clear. YOU ARE NOT A MAN. I NEVER SAID YOU WERE A MAN. I AM NOT A MAN I HAVEN'T SAID I WAS A MAN. Only that in terms of HIV risk factors you and I and every other transwomen need to wake up, smell the coffee, and realize that we have the SAME risk factors as MSM's. In some sectors of the transcommunity they have recognized this.

" Lit Well, in that case, we have a problem. Whatever prose there was no longer reads as such in the source given. I'm sorry, I never actually looked at the citation myself, I just thought that it was okay to list. I will fix the issue in the coming hours. ''' ~talk to me!~ "

Why was my talk page protected? Noone can use it right now?

Question Does anyone know if WWE has someone reading these pages.

The WP:RS policy does not classify dictionaries as tertiary sources. They are not in fact compendia, encyclopedias, textbooks, and other summarizing source. They are secondary sources because they are the results of scholars who research primary sources in order to determine the meanings of words. In fact the Oxford English Dictionary is the most reliable secondary source for the meanings of words in the English language. It is common sense that if one wants to know the meaning of a word that one consults a dictionary. Ironically, the twelve sources presented in the footnotes do not support the interpretation that User:Collect has provided. Also could we all please assume good faith.

":: I think the problem might be the unnecessarily mathematical description ""up to an additional 24−N nautical miles beyond the territorial sea, where the territorial sea is N nautical miles wide, N≤12"". If you were just skimming over the article, it would be easy to misread that the 24-N as 24N (i.e. 24 nautical miles). Unless anyone objects, I'll change this to a more plain-English description, such as ""A Contiguous Zone extends from the limit of the territorial sea, up to a distance of 24 nautical miles from the baseline"", possibly also adding ""In cases where the country in question has claimed less than 12nm for its territorial waters, its contiguous zone may therefore be more than 12nm wide"". Unless it has already been added (and I have just missed it), it needs to be mentioned that when territorial/contiguous zones belonging to different countries intersect, then the median line is taken as the boundary. "

" You sound like you know what you're talking about - However, we only accept published reliable sources. I'm sure there are many venues outside of Wikipedia, where you can help others be aware of this. —☆talk "

" Im sorry but it is not relivent to the article - i have just randomly out n ""High Wycombe"" and the Charing Cross info is there also! Why not put the ""From the central London"" - Charing Cross does not mean anything to a lot of people around the world. "

" Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! PLANE • 2007-01-5 08:16"

" Replaceable fair use Image:VmaxBike.JPG Thanks for uploading Image:VmaxBike.JPG. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please: Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. tast "

" I've no strong feelings either way about splitting the early history section. the geog , politics, and wildlife sections are good. wildlife should probably be renamed ""flora and fauna"" (see South Africa and Australia), shortened, and made broader in scope. the full length version of wildlife could go in a separate articles - 'fauna in the drc' and 'flora in the drc'- "

I'm done for now... if anyone, Wikipedia Admin Overlord or otherwise, has any comment, question, criticism, or anything else to communicate about any of the changes I've made, I would welcome the message: coreyjahns@gmail.com. 04 April 2006 (UTC)

" They are not on the schedule. Check the listings. Tonight's episode is a repeat of ""Dragon Flower"", next week is ""Heather Report Part 1"". Make sure you check the schedule on Cartoon Network's and other TV listings sites. Okay? Thank you. "

I never called you a d.f. Was some other user, maybe an old page. Actually, you seem reasonable sometimes. Smile Jeff.

I got it now thank you! It was the settings. It's fixed now ^_^.

man of 2 for the decade you should say that he is the second best everything for the decade second best song yeah second best album confessions second best artist behind eminem ; to be expected for the whole decade 2000 209

No further edit from you or your future possible sock other wise you will get blocked for sock puppetry. Unless you get consensus you are hereby again restrained from any edit in the name of Hyperbole. Cheers

A brief glance at it left me with the impression that it was better classified as psychology than psychiatry. You can certainly change it if you prefer.

Cultural differences in marriage

" You're right, staying in a country while you are working does not constitute being an ""expatriate"". The definition of expatriate is someone that takes up residence there (residence does not constitute staying at a local hotel, or renting a house as you're a guest and not a resident of the region). I think we need not confuse ""living in a country"" with ""staying in a country"". When you're there for a couple of months, that isn't taking up residence. Now, if you're there for a couple of years, then you're talking about a move that will most likely require one to uproot their family for the duration of the stay. (Contact me) "

Thank you. The tool I'm using does not show the kind of vandalism edit you were responding to. Cheers!

@ArtaleGaspare bitch i got the flameeee

@edouglas528 That would be your Yankees Earl....we all know they should win all 162

"I don't get it. The goalposts keep changing. This is in fact very odd. It's quite simple really, I have requested a change in the article and provided credible sources that support my proposed change. In that regard, I have fulfilled the Wiki policy on edit requests. Further this odd ""consesus"" requirement was not required the first time I made this post. I was only required to quote ""mention the specific changes in a ""change X to Y"" format"". Please clarify. "

Also, you might want to check the ISFDB entry on AEVV at:

REDIRECT Talk:1954 BOAC Lockheed Constellation crash

you are quite right: that other page should be deleted also. There's many such articles in WP, left over from when our standards were lower. It is particularly important that we remove them so they don't serve as models. There are many different ways to write low quality promotional pages about non-notable companies: in your case, the article was primarily a list of clients. That goes on your website, not in an encyclopedia. I'd be very glad to be notified of similar articles. By the way, are you aware of our Terms of Use, particularly with respect to paid contributions without disclosure ? '''''' ( talk )

Simple, just read above for the reason I created the second page. I included the Lostpedia information due to it's conciseness. The information in the Danielle topic needs cleaning up & rewriting into a less synoptic format. That information does that -

Good work! Did you know that this article is longer than the one on Monet. It really shows that you have your priorities straight when we have more to say about some fad video than Monet. Wikipedia even had an overlong article about Slashdot trolling phenomena. TRANSCRIPT VS CAPTION IN TRANSCRIPT IT SAY 'IT ISNT SETTLED' BUT IN CAPTION IT SAY 'IT NOT RESOLVED'. FUCK THEY SAYING DIRECTLY TRANSLATED INTO ENGLISH? SETTLED OR RESOLVED? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.195.132.253 . First, turn off your caps. Then let me tell you that basicly the two means the same, so either settled or resolved would work. Removal from WikiProject Biography

" So the loser group of editors who elected you in the first place is going to recall you. You make me laugh. How about you voluntarily resign and let us re-elect you? Oh, you're too much of a coward to do that? You'd rather attack me instead? Demand an apology? You make me laugh. I pity your moral reasoning. Talk• Contributions "

It's re-assuring to see that everything I predicted has come to pass: proliferation of this nonsensical boosterism in the lead, defending it by appeals to precedent of other universities doing it, etc.

heatsketch, 8:56 September 15, 2007

I think it would be best if we just call them by their original team names, UnliDay or UnliNight. THV/TW were just the renamed version of UnliNight and UnliDay, respectively.

" Hi Mike, I restored the article, but changed the issues that were there, such as having Wikipedia as a reference. It appears to me at first glance to be valid, however I'd consider moving it to Gero-Informatics as that's the proper name. Let me know what you think here, if you agree I'd be happy to move it. Thanks! Ariel♥Gold "

" It is going to take a LOT of work. The taxonomy section alone is a disaster. Just sourcing alone is not enough, for a major article like this one, we need to be comprehensive and very accurate. I'm willing to dig in and help with a team effort, though. See for an example horse, which is GA - took us about six months of pretty diligent work. (talk) "

" Do not call me ""daft."" This tête-à-tête is done. Stop posting here and let ArbCom do whatever. "

One possible solution maybe could

" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to H. H. Holmes. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.   — (|contribs) "

PLEASE, UNBLOCK ME, I WILL BE GOOD FROM NOW ON! D PLEASE, I ALLREADY AM THINKING OF SOME GOOD PAGES I COULD MAKE (FREAK OUT: EXTREME FREERIDE ETC...)

That's funny. Hanuman Das made precisely the same observation about Mattisse and Timmy12, here or more readably here. Nobody who signed the RfC took it seriously. Do you? (Talk)

" Pineapple tarts! Yum! We found a Malaysian supermarket near our house, so mostly we're happy... even got frozen durian leh. But some things can only make yourself, like char siew and wontons and stuff like that. But only thing, mooncakes are so expensive, like $6 each...Anyway, 新年快乐! ✞(Kay) "

Microwave Oven Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.

" AE requested I request Arbitration Enforcement against user:Varsovian as he once again broke his Digwuren sanctions. The restriction as logged here (on 28 May) is crystal clear, quote: Also, whenever he alleges misconduct by another editor, he must with the same edit provide all diffs that are required to substantiate his allegations, or link to the place where he has already provided these diffs, if he has not already provided them in the same section of the discussion at issue. In this edit today he accused me of wiki-stalking him without proving a single diff (or a link where he provided these diffs), something his sanction explicitly forbids. "

" Michelle Rodriguez As you accepted this edit, please note discussion at Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Cara_Delevingne. Online "

I support the suggestion.

" A pie for you! A peach pie for your superb efforts today! ♦ Dr. Blofeld "

I will reconsider when you tell me what I did wrong! You have not said what I did that was harrassment!!!

Since there’s some resistance to simply blanking the section for the time being, I’ve just done some cleanup, mainly removing non-notable entries that had only generic template messages. I’ve also flagged it as being largely copied from primary sources. We need some third-party sources in this section, or it has to go. —67.14.236.50

You *Could* Present The Simple Solutions As Simple, Elegant, But Only Useful In Certain Cases The reliable sources that point out that the simple solutions don't generalize when certain assumptions are changed do not have to be considered critics. Rather, the Wikipedia article could introduce the simple solutions as wonderfully accessible devices to explain the 2/3 & 1/3 vs 50/50 paradox of door 1 and door 3, *because* of the unique premises of the problem. It would be very useful to point out that if certain premises were changed, one might need a tool that can handle the complexities of conditional problems (unlike the 100% likelihood of revealing a goat behind another door). Then refer the reader to a section which gives voice to the reliable sources who offer up a host bias or the random Monty, or whatever, to explain to the interested reader what a conditional problem looks like.

" Hi Micky, Hey, not sure if my last message went out or not. My system sort of froze up for a bit and I could not log back on for a bit. The gist of what I typed folows: Not intending to be a smart aleck but the seal, as opposed to the coat of arms doesn't appear in color officially. I think Deb Markowitz, secreatary of stae for Vermont would back up that it is a single color device. I really do like the seal, it was deisgned by Ira Allen, and is refreshingly differnet from most others. Perhaps a trifle naïve in design but a nice device. It was designed to have dies cut for embossing so it is high contrast line art not showing shafiding or multiple colors. If you take a look at the staes of Maine, California, Michigan, you note more of a full color with shading and dpeth sort of treatment. these though labled ""seals"" are all heraldically like a coat of arms. If we look at nations, like the Netherlands, UK, Canda, we see coats of arms. American civic heraldry is different. Vermont like many of our older east coast states has a coat of arms that is described by a statute, what can be called a blazon. Because vermont's coat of arms is so great I would love to see it used somewhere. Maybe as an illustration on the Vermont page, and as its own entry. If the word ""Seal"" in the sidebar is boiler plate and can not be changed to coat of arms, could we use a solis dark green or medium gray without the color? And, possibly use the more colorful coat of arms, for the state links at botom of page. It's a thought. I grew up in Vermont. I see you are from Enlgand. What part? I am doing a signage and branding project in Sevenoaks, Kent at present. Best, Jim"

remember in a relationship.. her friends are NOT yours.. 🙅 they'll let her be a hoe...

The point here should be to describe that Israel sees itself as European and that Europe recognises Israel as quasi-European in many instances, which could be the base for a claim to EU membership. This section could also describe on what these conceptions are based (immigration from Europe, Zionism as originally European idea, shared values ...), and what other conceptions of what the EU should be like stand in the way of an EU membership. 141.91.136.41

Yakkity yak! (Don't talk back)

" the problem being ...? Hi, which problem am I part of, and what gives you that impression? Curiously, (chat) "

" Justin, this wasn't a rewrite. I know I put that in the edit summary, but it was more a rearranging of the existing information. I really wish you had read the article before you reverted. I did not ""throw it out and start over""! Also, please do a diff from the time of the peer review to now. You'll see the article is nothing like it was when it was peer reviewed. "

Modernist, you are mentioned here. I appreciate all your help; expert openion always welcome and appreciated.

" Sure just send an email to permissions-commons-at-wikimedia.org tell them the name of the file (""Suzie_dickinson.jpg"") and explain that you commissioned the photo, own the copyright, and are happy to release it into the public domain. "

to be strongly avioded]]

the 'content' removed was just meaningless lists. if you actually read what i had done you would see that the content removed was useless and i had made a lot of other changes too that improved the article.

Since it's now April 8th and no response I am assuming nobody objects.

This white bitch had the fuckin nerve to call me a nigga👎 when shes the one payin for her lips to get bigga😂😴

just because Alexander spared Porus' life, doesn't make the battle any less of a last stand, many people were killed. Encyclopædia Iranica is a project of Columbia University, it's an academic source.

2006 (UTC) I've never heard or seen anyone use that word. I know what South America is, but it's in some sense a single word that can't be broken up as you're indicating. 11:30, 1 September

Nigga gone have to get a room like a bitch

00:00, 19 February 2011

" should provide you with the ""guidelines"" and"

I think this article is a somewhat derogatory form of original research phrase, and it lacks references to say otherwise. If anyone has any references of the use of this term in this fashion, please add them. '''''' (talk)

" If you could back this up with RS it'd be much better, thanks. chat "

" Can you check on something - weird You deleted this page today, and rightly so, but somehow it was on my watchlist after deletion. The only reason I can see that happening is that a page was moved to this title and then deleted. Can you check the deleted article's history and see if that is the case? I don't immediately notice any other article on my watchlist ""missing"", but I probably wouldn't notice it immediately. It's just really weird, and it doesn't make sense to me. Thanks for taking a look into it. • • • 05:24 (UTC) 17 Mar '08"

A while back, someone made the statement in one of the TP archives about Ceres having an ocean and it was questioned, but the originator never responded.

I appreciate you taking the time to have a look at the edit history. Yes Codf1977 was always very active whilst 'semi-retired, but although they made a couple of edits after their 'retirement' their activity had fallen off almost completely (predictably one of their very few 'retirement' edits was to revert an action that I had made here: []) and on quite a few days there was no activity at all on the account. VHarris44 was clearly not someone completely new to Wikipedia. That much is very clear from their skill in navigating Wikipedia, such as posting a help request on their talk page and posting Advert tags on articles, right from the first day of their activity. This is someone who had prior experience on Wikipedia. It is also I believe reasonably well established that VHarris44's behaviour towards me was inappropriate, they were afterall permanently blocked for their behaviour and four requests by them for a reversal were turned down. There is also the issue of VHarris44 having known details about my university. Did they really find this from looking through the history of my talk page? That has to be extremely unlikely. So the obvious question is, who is VHarris44? A very logical possibility is, another experienced user that I have serious disagreements with. To my knowledge there is only one user in that category. Now in view of the timing of that user's retirement, the fact that that retirement quickly followed their failure to succeed in getting a page that I had created deleted, the fact that one of the only edits during their retirement was to undo one of my edits, and the fact that they then remerged so quickly following my difficulties with VHarris44, this is all very strong circumstantial evidence that VHarris44 and Codf1977 are the same person. So was Codf1977's detailed exposition of their view of my dealings with VHarris44 here: User talk:TFOWR#Rangoon11's filing of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Codf1977 and his other actions yesterday. In terms of the spelling mistakes made by VHarris44, I have looked again myself and concede that I cannot immediately find examples of the same spelling mistake in Codf1977's writing, but equally I cannot find exactly the same text written by Codf1977 in which those mistakes occurred (i.e. I can't find an example of Codf1977 saying 'no one agrees with you' or 'know one agrees with you'). They both seem to have poor spelling. 'such big changes must be agreed in talk page' is an edit description which both Codf1977 and VHarris44 have used. Ultimately there is little text written by VHarris44 to go on though. I do not believe it a absolute certainly that Codf1977 and VHarris44 are the same person, merely that the circumstantial evidence in that direction is very strong. I can accept that others do not feel the evidence sufficient. However I have been blocked on the grounds of harrassment for making a complaint based upon that circumstantial evidence. That seems very unfair, for even though others may not believe that there is sufficient evidence that Codf1977 and VHarris44 are the same person, I really struggle to see that others cannot see the circumstantial evidence that I saw and therefore relate to why I felt compelled to post a message on the admin board.

Oppose I Think he should be referred to as a nigger. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.109.182.144

Kicking niccas Tf outcha mentions like

Do you have something against WWII generals? He died in WWII fighting for our country

You are an arse! SHUTUP!

" 1) Ref #5 is handled...it no longer exists on the SpaceX site as far as I can tell, so I pulled from Archive.org. Performed lots of other citation fixes, including fixing a couple of URLs that were incorrect. I also agree that the forum cite should be removed...if a replacement cannot be located, the material needs to be excised. In my opinion, all the newspacewatch.com articles should be replaced since they've gone completely paywall (I'll be surprised if they survive), even though I've added archive links to all four of those cites. 2) I'll come back and clean up various conversion issues (definitely SI before non-SI in space-related articles), but I didn't immediately see much in the way of spelling issues. There's some formatting work to be done, but doesn't seem too bad. 3) As for images...they simply don't exist at this point in time (SpaceX is, after all, a private company, and conducts their testing in-house). I'm always keeping an eye out for them, but I don't expect anything until this version of the rocket is used for a NASA mission. However, lack of media should not disqualify the article from any status, even as Featured Article (I recall one last year that was passed without free media). Editors cannot be held responsible in situations like this. 4) I agree that ""rocket"" could be dropped from the title as redundant. Or, use something like ""SpaceX reusable rocket program"". Eh? — (t @ c) "

" Alinor, the author, Elior Levy, is the only person in the YNet piece who even employed the term ""declaration"". The term ""unilateral"" does not appear in the YNet piece and the Eurasia Review article doesn't mention a ""unilateral declaration"" at all. I notice that you quoted an editorial comment from Amira Hess the other day as if she were the spokesperson of the Palestinian government. Now you are quoting Elior Levy instead of the Palestinian who was interviewed. The use of the term ""unilateral"" in article talk space when neither source mentions that word wasn't bordering on WP:CRYSTAL. Its was over the line WP:Synth. "