Datasets:

yiyic

/

devpost_project_py_descriptions

like 0

https://devpost.com/software/treeldr

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - As the virtual world took over all forms of educational learning, we discovered that there seemed to be a discrepancy between the way information was presented versus the way information was stored and accessed. In particular, while great professors may have been able to give lectures packed to the brim with information, once that video was stored in the web, it became very unwieldy to navigate through and find specific bits of information. However, we noticed that despite these lectures being many hours long, most of them came in the form of slides--mostly unmoving, meaning that there was a way to greatly reduce the redundant information density contained within these videos for a more compact, explorable solution. What it does: - Enter TreeLDR. TreeLDR takes an arbitrary video file (it can be a URL, downloaded file, etc.) and outputs a sequence of slides annotated with key words and phrases that define that specific slide. Furthermore, these key words and phrases actually form links between slides through the entire video, meaning that when listening to the professor lecture over on one slide, you can click on an associated keyword and get a reminder of the previous slide where it was defined. Or, you could get a sneak peak of topics yet to come. TreeLDR strives to connect information with each other, bring together a more efficient viewing experience. How we built it: - We built TreeLDR using a combination of computer vision, natural language processing and front end engineering. We parse slides from a video sequence using computer vision before performing optical character recognition to get the paragraphs and lines within the text. From there, we perform keyword extraction, upon which we tokenize and match between all slides within a presentation in order to get a graph of common information between slides. That information is then transferred over to a front end website which aims for ease of use for students. We tried to make the UI as streamlined as possible so that anyone could use the tool, while still providing the depth that the many connections offer. TreeLDR is a tool built by students, for students. Challenges we ran into: - One major challenge we ran into early on was the extraction and matching of keywords from the slides. We knew that there would be many libraries capable of doing text recognition, but we were not aware of--at the time--of many common algorithms for semantic understanding of key phrases that can be used to match very different phrases between slides. However, we took the time to plan and researched many NLP algorithms, one being cosine distance, and were able to quickly get to speed with the meat of the backend. We also had trouble with integration late in the project, but because we set ourselves up early for success, we were doing well through the competition. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We are quite proud of getting a working, polished product that delivers on the initial promise and uses some novel ideas to get a working system. We are also proud of how we planned the system from beginning to end, and made sure we hit the milestones along the way. In this way, we both became better coders, but also understood how to finish a project, market it, and make it usable for a general audience. What we learned: - We learned a great deal during this Hackathon. One of the most important lessons we learned was to build upon the work of others. Hacking is really about pulling together disparate knowledge from many different areas and combining them together in a unique way. We combined computer vision, natural language processing, server side programming, and front end engineering (all with a healthy dose of help from online resources) to create a great project that we are proud of. What's next for TreeLDR: - For TreeLDR, there is so much to improve. One possible idea is to extend the connection system, allowing for better keyword matching and able to work on larger data sets/longer slides. One of the most exciting things, however, is the ability to visualize a graph of the generated data, which is a completely new way of interacting with educational content. We envision a "prezi"-like presentation scheme where one can easily navigate and backtrack through relevant content, thus generating a solid flow for studying. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/launchcad

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - CAD, also known as Computer-Aided Design, is an integral process towards the planning portion of many engineering projects. However, for many new engineers, having to learn the software and concepts behind CAD just to design the elements of their project seems daunting. We asked ourselves, “How can we lower the barrier of entry so beginners can start CADing without tons of technical experience?” If only there was a way to simplify the process so engineers can start prototyping right away… drum roll … introducing LaunchCAD, a way to CAD that is as simple as putting pen to paper, a launchpad for every engineer’s journey. What it does: - LaunchCAD converts two-dimensional isometric drawings into three-dimensional CAD models. Using a mobile device, users can scan an isometric drawing and upload it directly onto a computer where the image will be converted into a .stl file. These files can then be used however the user wants to, whether for additional tweaking, 3D printing, or other such projects. How we built it: - Using open-source libraries and our own code, we were able to apply neural networks, optimization algorithms, and different mathematical models to create our application. The primary conversion from the isometric drawing to tangible data was through the use of OpenCV’s template matching CNN (convolutional neural network). On top of the template matching, we used trigonometric calculations to straighten out the isometric image into planes of 2d matrices. Finally, using statistical analysis and NumPy meshes, we were able to determine the relative location of each cube and assemble a CAD model. The frontend of our application was built using React Native and the backend was built using Tornado. Challenges we ran into: Accomplishments that we're proud of: What's next for LaunchCAD: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/one-go

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Our team attempts to explore innovative applications in a world that is significantly impacted by COVID-19. The food hospitality industry, which is traditionally dominated by dine-in services, witnesses an enormous increase in demands for contact-free services such as delivery and curbside pickup. While delivery is supported by a wide range of awesome apps such as DoorDash and UberEats, there haven't been a lot of applications that are specifically curtailed to curbside pickup, which offers a more flexible option of dining at a much affordable cost. This shortage inspires our idea to use NCR BSP APIs to create a curbside pick-up optimization platform, as our project for the HackGT 8 challenge. What it does: - One day, you have an irrational thirst for sushi :sushi: and boba tea :bubble_tea:. However, you're not sure which sushi restaurant and which boba tea shop you should drop by so that you can achieve both of the following objectives in a one single pickup route :car:: - \ntravelling at the Shortest Distance\nGetting the Best food quality of both restaurants together\n - This is precisely where our web application comes in. Our “bundling” option allows customers to order from multiple restaurants and pick up their orders in a single trip without swiping through different apps. Given a list of multiple keywords, we conduct fuzzy searches on each one of them and create a set of combinations of eateries (and groceries, by the next extension) between each search. Each combination is treated as one item, and for each combination, our ranking algorithm computes a combined score from 1) the weighted average rating of all restaurants in this combination, and 2) the total distance of the shortest route that covers all restaurants in this combination. How we built it: - We have built the frontend with Javascript and React, and the backend with Python that is also used to connect the API from NCR and Google Map. Challenges we ran into: - The API from NCR has a unique syntax. We took quite a long time to familiarise ourselves with the usage of the API and fix the errors arising in using the the API. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We have built a robust web application that can perform optimisation of restaurant bundles based on multiple factors, known as travelling distance and average reviews. The user interface is user-friendly and clean. What we learned: - It is the first time experience for most of our teammates to apply API in a real application. We have also learnt to work under the pressure to create a functional web applications by connecting the frontend and backend infrastructure. What's next for ONE GO!: - NCR BSP API Challenge: One Go!\nWe are exploring options to include more methods of MENU API from NCR, which are not available for this Hackathon this now. With this API in place, we have a more sophisticated platform that can help the customers to order the food on the fly in ONE GO! ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/better-visual-sensing

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Wanting to create a solution to address accessibility needs, we decided to create a new approach to helping those with visual impairments interact with the world around them. What it does: - The sensor calculates the distance between the user and the closest object in proximity and vibrates to let the user know that they are approaching an object. How we built it: - Using a raspberry pi and the vibrating motor from an old phone, we created a prototype for our device. Challenges we ran into: - We found it difficult to consolidate our design into something more convenient, discrete, and wearable. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Having a mostly operational prototype for our solution. Ideally, a more complete solution would be wearable and vibrate consistently based on the proximity to the obstacle. What's next for Better Visual Sensing: - Creating a more discrete, wearable device that would give the user full awareness of their surroundings. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/bazaar-z2qg1f

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Problem Statement: - Lack of exposure and availability of products created by minority groups and ECG based companies. Inspiration: - Small businesses took a particularly large hit during the COVID pandemic\nBusinesses owned by minorities, women, and LGBTQ members (MWGBs) face challenges towards achieving the same success as other businesses\nMany local businesses don’t have the resources to market themselves and suffer from lack of awareness What it Does: - Bazaar is a social media network for retail purchases showing off the cool things you buy to your friends\nProducts that are environmentally-friendly and/or bought from MWGBs are prioritized higher on the feed so they can stand out more\nUsers receive points for their purchases (buying environmentally-friendly or MWGB products gets a lot more points). Also, on your next order (at any store), you gain double points for posting your purchases to your friends! Once you get a certain number points, you can get rewards like gift cards at the local stores you love!\nA stores tab in the app lists MWGBs around you and links to their website. How it Works: - When you buy an item at a supporting business, you scan your QR code and the verified purchase appears in your purchase list\nYou can post the item to the feed from the purchase list, sharing it to other Bazaar users\nYou gain points for every purchase, varying based on what types of small local businesses you’re supporting, eventually leading to rewards\nYou gain badges for collecting a certain amount of purchases of a given type\nYou can search for local small minority owned businesses to find their summaries and websites to further support them\nYou can form a network of friends to share your progress in supporting your favorite businesses with Use Cases: - Learn about new products. \nHave the opportunity to exercise loyalty based rewards. \nInteract with consumers who share similar interests as well as advertise for products they believe in. How we Built It: - Developed an iOS mobile application in XCode using Storyboards and Swift\nLinked Swift frontend to Firebase database to deal with storing data and media, as well as authentication profiles\nA mock POS Android App that acts the store that would verify users’ purchases by QR codes unique to each user and automatically add their orders to their profile\nA backend using Python that handles all of the requests to the NCR APIs using HMAC authentication, as well as the bulk of the interaction with our database. This also receives the sales info from stores when a user makes a purchase and adds those products to the user’s profiles. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/gulp-nxv34b

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - We wanted to provide retailers with the opportunity to better serve their customers in a personalized way. What it does: - It provides a smart informational dashboard and suite of tools. How we built it: - We built each tool using Python and OpenCV. Challenges we ran into: - We ran into challenges while working with hardware and integrating a ROS dashboard. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We were able to get several of our projects working efficiently, and we learned a lot of new technologies. What we learned: - Computer vision, how to use ROS, vision tracking. What's next for Smart Store: - Optimizing current features based on user experience. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/smallfund

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: What it does: - SmallFund is a platform that allows small businesses to advertise their returned products and increase their chances of making profit on a sold item. A huge problem that small businesses face is not being able to resale returned products which leads to loss of profits and heavy wastage of goods. Using our platform, small businesses will be able to upload pictures of their refunded items with a small description and wholesale them to the public for the chance to make a profit. How it works: - Sellers (small businesses) can create a profile on the website to register and login. Once logged into the platform and validated, they can start to create items by uploading an image and providing a name, description, and price of the returned product. Our custom ML algorithm will check if the item is defective based on the image uploaded and determine if it is viable to be uploaded into the database and displayed on the platform for consumers to see. Once it is on the platform, consumers can easily go and buy the item for a lower price and sellers will be notified if their products get sold. Challenges we ran into: - Some challenges we ran into were integrating the NCR apis to help maintain the item catalog and seller database. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We're proud of creating a fully functional platform that allows sellers to display items and consumers to buy items. What we learned: What's next for SmallFund: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/gt-financial-planner

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - GT Students need to be financially literate and be able to easily keep track of finances along will all other school work, which can be hard. What it does: - Creates a financial guide, budget calculator, and finance predictor for students. How we built it: - We used HTML, javascript, JQuery, Python, CSS, and Github Challenges we ran into: - Code bugs, idea detailing Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We feel this project could be useful to GT students and make their lives a lot easier. What we learned: - How to work cohesively as a team to implement a new and creative idea. What's next for GT Financial Planner: - We plan to implement further features and algorithms to enhance our project. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/auto-accept

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - A person on Linkedin has uploaded a post requesting the team to implement a feature so that he can accept all his 600 pending connection requests. I thought I can build this project What it does: - It checks for the connection requests in inbox and accepts them one by one with the time frame of 3 seconds per request How we built it: - I used StreamLit for user interface and selenium module in Python to automate this process Challenges we ran into: - I need to test my project to make sure that it runs. However I hardly receive a connection request on Linkedin. So, I approached many student communities to send me a connection request. In an hour, I received more than 30 requests. This was plenty for me and I completed testing it. What we learned: - I learnt more about selenium concepts and I felt overwhelmed by the support that I received to complete my project What's next for Auto Accept: - I am planning to build a chrome extension for the project ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/weather-app-23yc7m

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: What it does: - The Python script fetches current weather data from the OpenWeatherMap API and displays the current temperature, humidity, pressure and weather report. How I built it: - I built it using Python and with the help of OpenWeatherMap API. Challenges we ran into: - Getting the API to work was the first hassle I ran into. Eventually, I was able to get it to work. What I learned: - I have learnt to use APIs now! This was my first time using one and it was incredible! What's next for Weather App: - Incorporating more features like a GUI, Pictures to indicate the current weather report and even a 7-day forecast would be great additions to the App. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/project-setup-creator

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - The main inspiration for this project is to automate setting up the project environment setup which we have to do every time we start the PC. So rather than writing same command to go to project location and open it in code editor and also to initialize back-end, why can't we convert this all into a single small command. What it does: - It saves all the command needed to set the environment and associate it with a setup name, which we can use as reference to run it. How we built it: - I built it with all the core packages of python. Challenges we ran into: - Few challenges I faced: Accomplishments that we're proud of: What we learned: What's next for Project Setup Creator: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/covid19-health-news

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Two spread daily awareness about covid19 What it does: - It is an automated system that will give messages in your SMS inbox about the health conditions in India and other health tips. How we built it: - It is made using Twilio API and newsapi and automated on pythonanywhere platform Challenges we ran into: - How to get the newsapi to get it to work. What we learned: - We learned how to deal with APIs and how we can automate the tasks. Majorly how to work with amazing service as Twilio. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/cleanup-nj46ds

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - I thought there would be some people like me who didn't know about temp files and decided to make this What it does: - Cleanup takes inputs for the corresponding directories (namely temp, %temp%, prefetch, softwaredistribution) and deletes the files in them.\nAfter the first time those inputs will be saved so you can keep reusing the app with more ease How we built it: - Except for the .bat file, everything else is in Python (PyQt5 for the GUI) Challenges we ran into: - These folders require administrative access so sometimes it just wouldn't work if you didn't have the rights (Windows 11 stuff), so used a self elevating shell script that forces it run as admin incase Accomplishments that we're proud of: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/weather-script-python

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: What it does: - Take a location as an command line argument and prints the weather of the location. How we built it: - This project is build using python. Challenges we ran into: - Using JSON files in python. What we learned: - Converting strings to JSON in python. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/weather-report-script

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Instructions to execute the script: Sample Output: - Weather Report of New Delhi, India\nMonday, 2022-01-10\nThe current temperature is 12°C with 97% humidity\nThe sky is Cloudy with a wind speed of 9 km/h West\n ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/weather_forecast-py

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: weather_forecast: What it does: - It essentially uses API calls to get data from a weather API and displays the current weather of a city. How I built it: - I used openweathermap.org's free weather API to get the data of the current weather and weather conditions and coded it with Python. Challenges I ran into: - One of the challenges i ran into was how to display images of the weather conditions (eg. when it's sunny or cloudy etc.) from the API. Instead, I displayed the current condition as a Text so that the user can understand the current condition of the weather of their desired location. What I learned: - I learnt how to use an API and make API calls. This was a really fun project and i had a blast making it! What's next for weather_forecast.py?: - In the future iteration, I will try to add images for this python script instead of displaying the current weather condition as Text. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/weather-script-r7nbjm

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Description: - This script uses the OpenWeatherMap API. The purpose is simply to retrieve the current weather temperature and description. It is only used in the console. How To Run: - First create a file called credentials.py and create the following method with your API key: - def GetWeatherAPIKey():\n return [API key]\n - Then run: - python3 weather.py\n```S\n ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/automate-a-daily-task-iwzpov

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration..: What it does: How we built it: Challenges we ran into: Accomplishments that we're proud of: What we learned: What's next for Automating to play a vid on YT: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/timer-685uk3

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: What it does: - Creates a timer for the duration specified How we built it: - It is a simple app built using Python and Tkinter library. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/exchange-rates

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - When we travel abroad and always feel the urge to convert the currency to evaluate our future expenditure, be it during shopping or eating in an expensive restaurant. So to evaluate this quickly we could run a currency exchange python script on our mobile phones or PC instead of googling, especially useful when we don't have access to the internet or to not get distracted by Google. What it does: - Converts any foreign currency to any base currency via your terminal\npython .\\QXchange.py 55 usd inr\nThis CLI command converts 55 USD to INR (Indian Rupees) How we built it: - Using Python Challenges we ran into: - Learning the currency codes for different countries from Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Built an CLI script What we learned: - CLI scripting What's next for Exchange-rates: - A QXchange mobile app ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/automate-moving-files

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - I was inspired to build this project because I know personally, and I'm sure others can relate, is that as a student you are constantly downloading files and when they all clutter in your download's folder, it can be very tedious to organize it and find all the files you need quickly. What it does: - Currently, this script only takes the files from your downloads folder and reorganizes them to the respective subfolders inside the download's folder. This way, the downloads' folder stays clean and allows you to look through them at a later time. How we built it: - I built this using python. I imported the os library alongside the shutil library(allows for high level file operations). Challenges we ran into: - Some challenges I ran into was setting the destination path, as when I just used a single backslash this would not work, so I had to use a double backslash. Still don't know why.... Accomplishments that we're proud of: - I'm proud to get my first python automation running smoothly. What we learned: - I learned that libraries allow for endless projects and that there are also many ways to preform a task in python, some more efficient than others. What's next for Automate Moving Files: - This script can be later adapted to rename and organize the files based on different criteria such as when you download it, from where you download it or even reading the file to see if maybe it is a certification or textbook and needs to go in your school folder or if it's just a random meme from your buddy and needs to go in the images\\fun folder. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/haiku-hack

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Description: - This script uses the DataMuse API. The purpose is create basic, nonsensical haikus around a given word. Haikus are a form of Japanese poetry that include 3 lines, that have 5-7-5 syllables respectively. Don't expect these to be any good. How To Run: - Simply execute the following: - python3 haiku.py\n ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/weather-py

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - From the weather challenge on day 1 What it does: - Gets the current weather for a city that the user specifies How we built it: - Using python, importing the requests and BeautifulSoup4 packages Challenges we ran into: - Lack of good websites to scrape from, web data requires javascript to run before displaying the html Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Found another way to write a function that checks the weather. Previously, I made a command to do the same but with the use of API's. What we learned: - That web scraping using bs4 directly is not very efficient to check for weather. Many sites will not display the code that displays the weather data immediately, as javascript needs to be run first. This can be fixed using selenium webdriver, which may be a solution to implement later on. What's next for Weather.py: - I will utilize different ways to check the weather rather than web scraping, namely using API's instead of scraping. This will allow me to gather more data, such as the weather for the next day. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/to-do-list-g3jdiw

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: To-do List: - A list created on python and jupyter notebook, showing your progress, you can use for add and organize your list of readings. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/scheduler-zyti4b

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Scheduler: - It's a Reminder made on python that read the computer day and time until the Reminders that you set in a start. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/weather-detector

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - It was something that we have always wanted to try out, since we had only made projects using the standard library of python and this seemed like a chance to work on something outside our knowledge field. What it does: - It tells you the weather of any city across the world How we built it: - We used resources on the internet to learn about the requests and json and tkinter to build an app that gives you the weather conditions of any city around the world Challenges we ran into: - First time using requests,json and tkinter modules. Debugging of API request errors was difficult. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - First hackathon project\nFirst GUI application with API interlinking What we learned: - How to use tkinter,json and requests modules in python. How to perform API interlinking tasks. What's next for Weather Detector: - We haven't planned much but hope for more features like weather maps and more exciting features!! ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/automate-a-daily-task-crypto-price-alerts

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - I wanted to make a project where I get crypto price alerts on the ago and also get custom alerts if the price goes down below a certain threshold and trigger an auto-buy by using my exchange's API. This bit is a smaller part of the future scope. What it does: - Alerts the user on discord by push notification to user's server using a webhook. How we built it: - Using python and rest API from my exchange provider and a cron job that triggers the script every hour. Challenges we ran into: - Handling the JSON response Accomplishments that we're proud of: - A quick nifty solution that has a good future scope and takes very little time to set up. What we learned: - Setting up discord webhooks, handling rest API responses in python and setting up cron jobs using crontab What's next for Automate a Daily Task - Crypto Price Alerts: - As mentioned, the future scope includes triggering auto buy or auto sell using the exchange's API if the price crosses a certain threshold. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/count-down-timer

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: What it does: - Helps to set timer so that you end up challenges without any delay. How we built it: - Python as a Programming Language, Timer as a package, Jupyter Notebook as a working environment. What we learned: - Python. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/weather-checking-script

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: What it does: - Input the name of the city and it will fetch weather current weather details along with forecast. How we built it: - Using Python and the python_weather library Challenges we ran into: Accomplishments that we're proud of: What we learned: What's next for Weather Checking Script: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/headlyzer

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Sentiment Analysis What it does: - Made a python script that analyzes headlines through i/o stream and predicts whether the article is "Positive" or "Negative" and assigns a score from 0 to 1 to emphasize on how Positive or Negative the article is. To run the python script, first install flair using $ pip install flair and then $ python .\\headlyzer.py How we built it: - Used Flair, which is a simple to use framework for state of the art NLP. Challenges we ran into: - Learning about various pre-trained NLP models Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Predicts the article sentiments with great accuracy What we learned: - Learnt about various pre-trained sentiment analysis models and its usage. What's next for Headlyzer: - A real time web scraping feature using selenium in the python script that fetch headlines from news websites and gives us its sentiments. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/timer-hack-sd1g6e

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: What it does: - The project executes a simple timer. We can input the time for which the timer should run and it will countdown till the given time. The timer will play a sound and display text to indicate end of set timer. How I built it: - I built it using Python. The libraries used are time and playsound. Challenges we ran into: - One challenge was getting the playsound library to work. I ran into some trouble bringing the sound file to the correct folder and getting it to run in the correct way. What we learned: - I was able to explore the time and playsound libraries and implement it for good use. What's next for Timer Hack: - First, I would like to make a GUI for it or convert it into a web app for ease of usage. I would love to implement a stopwatch feature and even introduce buttons to lap and reset while the timer is running. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/sentiment-analysis-ckrty7

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: What it does: - It helps in visualizing the news. How we built it: - It is built nlt library in python ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/simple-weather-checker-8ko9c2

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: What it does: - Using OpenWeather API How we built it: - Using Python. Challenges we ran into: - It spend time to research and solve the bug. What I learned: - Use the API What's next for Simple Weather Checker: - Maybe will provide more information for details ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/weather-report-o1wgri

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Checking the weather can be useful in all sorts of applications - from alarm clocks to reminders apps to websites and everything in between. What it does: - The script extracts the weather report for a city from Google and prints on the screen. How we built it: - Using requests and Beautiful Soup, the weather URL is scraped and then the data is extracted from the HTML content of the website. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Unlike OpenWeatherMaps API, we do not need any API Key here to fetch the data. What we learned: - While building the script, we learned about Web Scraping in Python. What's next for Weather Report: - This script can further be extended to other applications such as reminder apps. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/weathercripter

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Finding weather description can be handy especially when you plan to travel, or even sometimes when you are lazy enough to look out. What it does: - WEATHERSCRIPTER fetches weather description for given city How we built it: - This uses python as programming language, and utilizes OpenWeatherMap api and ipinfo.io api to fetch city and its weather condition Challenges we ran into: - If for some reason user doesn't provide city name then we can we do that for user Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Solving above challenge is plus, since it fetches city for user based on ip address What we learned: - We have learnt to use API, request and response thing to get weather description and reading that from json format What's next for WEATHERCRIPTER: - WEATHERSCRIPTER can include machine learning model to predict future weather condition ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/email-automation-with-python

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - A lot of E-Mails were needed to be sent out during a College Event. So being the lazy person I am, I built these scripts to automatically send out the emails quickly, and effectively. What it does: - It sends Emails! That's the simplest explanation. Be it simple Text Emails, or HTML Emails, or be that you have a large CSV File and you need to send E-Mails to multiple recipients. It does all that. How we built it: - Built using Python. The library used to send emails is called 'smtplib'. It communicates with the Gmail SMTP server (in my case) and sends the email via the Gmail account. HTML Emails and Attachments are added using the 'MIME' set of libraries, there are many. Challenges we ran into: - Honestly, this was a pretty easy implementation of Python, hence there were not so many challenges I faced, except a few syntactical errors. It was pretty fun making this all along. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - It was a breeze to load up multiple emails in a CSV file, and send the actual emails when required. This script is used in almost every college event I organized, and sending emails to hundreds of participants never was a problem. What we learned: - From this project, I learned a lot. The first thing was, If you can Automate something, just do it. It will make your life a lot easier. \nBut seriously, I learned a lot about Programming with Python and using the different libraries it has to offer. Python has always been my main programming language, and it can get a lot done. What's next for Email Automation with Python: - I wanted to make a few HTML E-Mail Templates that you can just load up, fill some data in, and send. Would work in that in GitHub later. About the code, I'll also build an option to add attachments to the emails, which is not yet there, but pretty simple. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/sleepy-script-parental-control-timer

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration - Why did we create this script?: - Due to COVID-19, most of our day-to-day tasks are conducted online. Online working culture has impacted academics and children's lives, both positively and negatively. They are facing medical problems like headaches and weak eyesight problems. As responsible parents, it is necessary to keep track of control of their children's screen time. To refresh their senses, they play multimedia games or watch movies and cartoons, but it should be within a limit. To tackle this situation, we have created the Sleepy Script . What it does?: - Parents/Users need to run this script for browsing the website. It provides a user to input the URL which he wants to surf. Parents set the timer and the operation (Lock, Restart, and Shutdown) they can execute. So they can restrict the screen time of their children effectively. How do we build it?: - We have used the Python programming language to create this script. For accessibility of the browser, we have imported a selenium web driver. The time module is used for time management and setting up the alarm. To execute system commands, we have used the subprocess. Challenges we ran into:: - The major challenge we ran into was that system commands like shutdown requires sudo permission and, initially, the script was not working. But we tackled this situation by performing research and thanks to this Ubuntu Help page. Accomplishments that we're proud of!: - The accomplishment that we are proud of is that it fulfills its motive fruitfully. Even when you are watching a movie at night, you want to set an automatic shutdown in case, you fall asleep, it can easily handle this. A multi-purpose script. What we learned?: - 1) We learned how to set up a selenium web driver with a Firefox browser and its operations.\n2) We learned to execute system commands like shutdown and reboot using python and subprocess.\n3) Playing with errors and selenium get requests. What's next for Sleepy Script - Parental Control & Timer?: - The next step for the Sleep Script is to enhance its capabilities by controlling the browser with CLI and more system commands that we can run. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/scrapping-using-python

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: What it does: - It can scrap the total number of tweets of a given twitter account How we built it: Challenges we ran into: Accomplishments that we're proud of: What we learned: What's next for scrapping using python: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/articleanalyzer

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: What it does: - This program can take in the input of a news article title and analyse the words in it to determine whether the article has positive or negative news. How I built it: - The program is made with Python, with the help of two borrowed data sets [Minqing Hu and Bing Liu. "Mining and Summarizing Customer Reviews." \nProceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-2004), Aug 22-25, 2004, Seattle, Washington, USA.] Challenges we ran into: - One challenge was to omit the apostrophes that some headlines have before analysing it. So, to fix that, a function was created to detect apostrophes and eliminate them before move to the analysing. What I learned: - I have learnt about how to incorporate data sets into my programs and utilise them to obtain desired results. What's next for ArticleAnalyser: - The first step would be to improve the accuracy of the analyser. Certain article titles that do have negative content doesn't get recognized as a negative article since the words of the title are not included in the pre-determined list of negative words. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/auto-email

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - redundancy makes your life so much difficult. so why not make things automate What it does: - it sends to email automatically How we built it: - i used the smtp library of python to build the project Challenges we ran into: - I didnt know how smtp works so I had to study the library and then madethis project Accomplishments that we're proud of: - it makes life easier to some extend What we learned: - how to use smtp lib in python to automate things What's next for auto email: - I Wll tryto fix any bugs and add new feature to it. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/timer-b2groc

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - LHD:BUILD inspired me to build this What it does: - It just countdowns to the time you have entered How we built it: - I made it with python using time and datetime module What we learned: - How to use modules ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/article-analysis-1uhmk6

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - MLH - LHD ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/timer-3ewbr6

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: What it does: How we built it: Challenges we ran into: Accomplishments that we're proud of: What we learned: What's next for Timer: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/random-haiku-generator

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Random Haiku generator: - \ud83d\udcdc A code that writes haiku poems with random words. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/email-automation-46um0g

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - LHD What it does: - It is automation to send email to people How we built it: - I build it using python language. Challenges we ran into: - the login to sendgrid is a real pain. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/automate_daily_scripture_portion

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Aim: - This code automates the daily part of me sending the Scripture portion individually to people who have joined with me in this year's (2022) challenge Working: - The project consists of various files in the name of all the months which in it contains the portion of the day.\nThere is also a code to take out the particular day's portion\nThen the code works to send that portion to all the people found in the file numbers\nAnd Voila! That works !!! ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/message-basher

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - -We in our busy lives are indulged in many activities and thus forget some important messages that need to be sent to our higher officials or family members or friends etc. In order to overcome this problem ,here comes the MESSAGE BASHER What it does: - -It is a program that enables the user to send a scheduled message for a particular contact and the user can send a particular message for a particular number of times he wishes to.\n-It takes the contact number along with country code,the text to be sent ,time in hours and time in minutes ,and the number of times the message need to be sent as the input \n-After clicking the submit button it automatically opens the whatsapp web and redirects to the contact that we entered and sends the person the entered text as many times as we want How we built it: - -We built it completely using python only\n-Python provides us with a wide variety of libraries and hence we used few of them Challenges we ran into: - -We faced challenges in making the Gui as the challenge is a daily challenge\n-I initially faced the challenge to merge the three ideas of creating GUI,sending automatic text and sending a text multiple times but finally managed to complete it Accomplishments that we're proud of: What we learned: - -I learnt the wide variety of use cases with python libraries and its functions\n-To automate an application to make things easier What's next for MESSAGE BASHER: - -we could add a better UI and have more features likes sending messages to groups ,sending in a broadcast also to add other messenger apps to send messages ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/counttimer

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: How I built it: - Using Python What we learned: - Looping ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/haikugenerator

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - NLP What it does: - Generates a Haiku from any piece of Text\neg:-A piece of text I am trained in gorilla warfare and Im the top sniper in the entire US armed forces. generates a haiku :- \nfull extent to wipe \nunholy retribution \nto its full extent How we built it: - Using spaCy, which does "Rule-Based Pattern Match" to process texts and syllapy to count syllables. \nSo before running the script, install spaCy and syllapy:- \n$ pip3 install -U spacy\n$ pip3 install syllapy \n$ python3 -m spacy download en_core_web_sm Challenges we ran into: - Learning about spaCy and generation of Haiku Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Understood the logic of random Haiku generation and was able to implement an Haiku NLP What we learned: - Haiku generation ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/circle-design-usiing-turtle

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: What it does: - /. How we built it: Challenges we ran into: Accomplishments that we're proud of: What we learned: What's next for Circle design usiing turtle: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/weather-forecast-efax0l

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - LHD:BUILD made me do this <3 What it does: - It gets weather forecast of entered place , time and date How we built it: - I made it using python by the use of modules Challenges we ran into: - I couldn't figure how to get the current forecast... What we learned: - How to use Modules and how date time and that all data is handled by python What's next for Weather Forecast: - Implement it in an app and make it cleaner ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/haiiku

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - This project is an attempt to use deep learning to generate haikus that conform to the 5-7-5 syllable pattern. - Here an examples of 5-7-5 syllable output: - early morning sun - from the carried garden fate - stars at the sunset - And if I use the same network to get a 10-10-10 poem: - just as the street lamp spake the sun is bright - and the soul and the spring are blowing - with every beat of my heart i will love you Challenges we ran into: - Much previous research into generating haikus doesn't enforce syllable counts, largely because modern English haikus often don't strictly conform to that pattern either. This makes finding training data difficult. I get around this problem by providing the syllable count of each line as an input to the network along with the text at training time. Then, at generation time, I can choose how many syllables I want for each line. This project is still early, but so far I've gotten some promising results. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/what-a-weather

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: What it does: - It is a web application that shows the weather for your entered city\n How we built it: - • Built this web app with python flask library. \n• For webpage design used HTML, CSS.\n• Used openweathermap API for getting weather information of a particular city.\n What we learned: - • Learned how to used python framework flask.\n• Learned how to use API in our web application.\n ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/deleting-outdated-whatsapp-groups

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Tens of whatsapp group that we dont use anymore. I am lazy to manually delete/remove the members, so here's my attempt at solving the problem What it does: - Searches the group name and removes every member of the group, then deletes the group How we built it: - I used python and specially pyautogui module What we learned: - How I can manipulate python to suite my needs and be more lazy :D What's next for Deleting outdated whatsapp groups: - Make it more versatile so that I can exit groups that I dont want. Also further develop it by adding a create whatsapp group function. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/check-the-weather

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - As MLH LHD is running and we got a challenge to write script to check weather. What it does: - It basically gives weather information of a particular city when entered. The data like temperature, pressure, humidity in percentage and a descriptive overall weather format. How we built it: - Built it using python and OpenWeathermap API, also required python modules like requests json. Challenges we ran into: - It was just a basic script so there were no such challenges. Accomplishments that we're proud of and What we learned: - Got to know about how to work with APIs and got hands dirty implementing first project using API. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/weather-api-4a2nis

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - MLH - LHD ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/book-manager

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - MLH - LHD ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/get-weather-forecast

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: \ud83c\udf24 Weather Report with Python: - ⚡️ A python program that will give you wether report of any area by inputting the area ⚙️ Developer Guide: \ud83d\udcc4 Preview: - ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/newsoui

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - It is difficult whole news. So present newOui that will summarize the news article. Sometimes you are not able to get which news headlines are popular, to see the popular heading of news you can use it. What it does: - \nIt can summarize the news article, show the author name, heading, sentimental analysis, publication date.\n2..It will show to news headlines of US.\nIt will show overall top news headlines. \n How we built it: - Using Python, API Accomplishments that we're proud of: - I am able to implement as I think. What we learned: - Learned about Tkinter What's next for NewsOui: - May be developing into an app ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/reminde-me

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - MLH Challenges What it does: - Reminds you of an event How we built it: - Python and Tkinter What we learned: - Tkinter ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/weather-status

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: What it does: - This small script fetches the weather status through the weatherapi. How we built it: - I used the requests library, JSON parsing and the weather API to build this. Challenges we ran into: - Using the API without exposing the API key. What we learned: - I learnt how to use the weather API. What's next for Weather Status: - I might consider making a Gatbsy site which fetches weather details on search. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/countdown-timer-3xj8os

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - MLH LHD What it does: - Counts time sought off timer How we built it: - python Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Successful compilation of the program What we learned: - Timer module of python ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/countdown-timer-drx0yw

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration MLH LHD: What it does Countdown timer: How we built it Using python time library: Accomplishments that we're proud of Successful compilation of program: What we learned Python and its modules: What's next for Countdown Timer We aim to enhance its efficiency and add certain functions to the code: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/leo-va

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - My only inspiration is jarvis from MCU. What it does: - It is a charismatic virtual assistant, can automate your daily task with it's web scraping and AI features.\nLike news reading, sending mail, getting weather report, any query, listening music more and more nothing but only for a voice command. and it will also reply with it's voice. How I built it: - I built it with python using more than a dozen of library like beautifulsoap, request ,re, pyttsx3 etc. Challenges we ran into: - The most challenges I got was lack of experience in web scraping. Also the application requires a lot of ram, so it's was lagging so much. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - finally I'm very proud of myself that I have successfully completed this project without any break. What we learned: - First of all it's uncountable what I've learned. It was a very important job for me and was my dream. What's next for Leo-VA: - Leo-VA is going to be Leo-VA++ with in a month with some really great upgrade. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/timer-3rdbl5

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - A regular time pass project. What it does: - It's a timer clock. How we built it: - using pygame. What we learned: - experiment with Gui app in python ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/current-weather

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration:: - Weather information is used in a variety of fields, starting from alarm clocks, remainder app, to websites. Thus came the need for an easily available script which can be used to check the weather at any given time. It can be also used in any different projects thus reducing the time required and adding a convenient functionality for any project. What it does:: - The current weather script provides the user the current weather conditions of any location of the world. It returns: How we built it:: - The whole script is written in Python 3.10.1. \nThe "Current Weather Data" from OpenWeatherMap API is used to collect all the weather condition data in the form of .json file.\nCode Editor used is Visual Studio Code.\nThe API key has been stored in Windows Environment Variables to secure the information. Challenges we ran into:: - The main challenge faced was reading the API key. \nAlso the storage of the API key was a new challenge. Accomplishments that we're proud of:: - Using an API to collect Weather Information.\nSecuring the code by hiding the API key.\nCreating a script which will be helpful in other projects as well. What we learned:: - \nUsing an API to collect information.\nStoring sensitive information like API key and passwords in Windows Environment Variables, thus increasing security.\n\n\nExtracting data in form of .json file\n\n What's next for Current Weather: - The script will be further developed into an Weather App. It will also be used in other projects to bring extra functionality to the project. Overall it is very useful since weather data is an essential information used in various fields. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/opening-applications-upon-boot

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Instructions to execute the script: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/automated-bulk-resume-parser

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - MLH LHD: Build 2022 What it does: - Helps recruiters parse through many resumes and extract the information they need. Challenges we ran into: - Understanding and implementing nlp was a bit challenging What we learned: - Nlp is an extremely useful when working with large amounts of text. It is extremely beneficial when we have to automate tasks What's next for Automated Bulk Resume Parser: - At present there are some bugs which need to be addressed. Other than that, I'm planning to make a desktop application which will make it more user-friendly for recruiters to use this application. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/tweet-liker

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - I've seen a lot of #100DaysOfCode bots and I wanna support #100DaysOfCoders too, so here I am :D What it does: - Likes #100DaysOfCode tweets ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/weather-status-nkcetq

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - I just wanted to try out something fun for MLH: LocalHackDay Build, and this challenge seemed fun What it does: - This is a Python script, which shows the current Weather Details of any Entered City.\nSuch as the city's current Temperature, Weather, Humidity etc. How we built it: - I built this script using just three tools:\nPython, openWeatherMap's API and most importantly FUN !!!! Challenges we ran into: - The only challenge, that I ran into was, while testing out the API, but it was fixed by reading the docs of the API. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - I am proud of this entire script !!\nI made it within an hour !! What we learned: - REST API from openWeatherMap, Thunder Client VS code extension and calling APIs from Python What's next for Weather Status: - Creating a beautiful front-end for this small script !! ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/weather-forecast-xqe0om

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Makes easier to check weather from terminal. What it does: - Tells current weather report of major cities How we built it: - With help python with python-weather module Accomplishments that we're proud of: What we learned: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/weather-checker-sy8r6i

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Checking the weather can be useful in all sorts of applications - from alarm clocks to reminders apps to websites and everything in between. How we built it: - Using Python and OpenweatherAPI ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/article-scaper

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: What it does: - It scraps the articles and analyzes it How we built it: - Built using Python ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/hackhaiku

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - My parents like to have poetry nights. This will help them. What it does: How we built it: Challenges we ran into: Accomplishments that we're proud of: What we learned: What's next for HackHaiku: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/haiku-maker

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: What it does: - Generates Haiku How we built it: - Using Python ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/reminder-bt7d3h

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - It’s time to create a timer hack ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/script-to-check-the-weather-dj2kae

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: What it does: - It asks the user to provide the name of a city and returns a sentence repeating the name of the city and it's country then says the weather and the temperature in Farenheit and Celsius. How we built it: - I used the OpenWeatherMap API and the requests library in Python. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/timer-hack-aedzoh

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: What it does: - It acts as a pomodoro timer and stores data regarding the tasks you've worked on and the time when the task was started. How we built it: - I used python and it's time and datetime libraries to build this. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - It can be used for task management What we learned: - I've learnt how to use the datetime library. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/password-manager-v2mbjp

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - I keep forgetting all my passwords for different things and then end up using the same password for all places. What it does: - It does the work of storing all my passwords for me securely encrypted in a database and I just have to remember 1 password to access all my passwords. No more forgetting. How we built it: - I built it implementing the cryptography module in python with MySQL and a secure encrypted login system to keep all the passwords safe. Challenges we ran into: - Login was bypassable, encrypting and decrypting the login id and passwords to access all the encrypted passwords. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Made changes in the description model and made a unique key specific to the device along with the one assigned to each user. What we learned: - Learned about the workflow of cryptography and how to build projects to solve real-life issues. What's next for Password Manager: - I'll try to add a better GUI and improve the encryption and description method. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/fire-typer

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Getting my A$$ beaten by my friend at speed typing. What it does: - Puts your keyboard on fire(not literally) and.. (insert dramatic music) it types really fast.. yeah that's it. How we built it: - Using Selenium library in Python and some coffe. Challenges we ran into: - Not much of an issue but cheating the anti-cheat mechanism of the site, it was fun. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - My friend's precious face when he loses What we learned: - That you'll learn a whole new library given that you have that feeling of REVENGE! What's next for FIRE Typer: - Currently it's for 10fastfingers only. I'm planning to make one for every other site(work in progress).\nAlso using some OCR to overcome some of the 'smart' sites with anti-cheat. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/password-manager-fdsypc

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: What it does: - manage passwords of different websites How we built it: - using mysql python Challenges we ran into: - learnt mysql connector in python Accomplishments that we're proud of: - learnt how to use mysql What we learned: - learned new concepts of mysql python ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/email-summarizer

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - When we are in a hurry and need to Quickly go through the emails just get the important points What it does: - It summarizes the body of the email in a few words How we built it: - It was build using the gensim package of python , which summarizes the body of email Challenges we ran into: Accomplishments that we're proud of: What we learned: - learned about extracting mails from inbox What's next for Email Summarizer: - Make a app to display the Summarized emails ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/automate-a-daily-task-lr4z3x

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: What it does: - Generate one paragraph of short lorem ipsum using loripsum.net API. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/cli_weather_script_python

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: How I built it: - using python & third party libraries like requests What I learned: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/weather-checker-s0craf

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: What it does: - .. How we built it: Challenges we ran into: Accomplishments that we're proud of: What we learned: What's next for weather checker: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/sentiment-analysis-hj56es

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - The inspiration is taken from Microsoft Resources Website and i make the code as a virtual container and display the result in the terminal and at the same time as a simple website ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/aircraft_defect_detection

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - I'm motivated to learn more regarding AI and this problem statement was about manufacturing defects which is an area I am interested in. I wanted to explore the possibility of using Microsoft Azure and to expose myself to AI more since I am still a student and from a non-IT background. This is my first time joining hackathon and it made me learn a lot and push myself out of my comfort zone. I believe I still have long way to go and I am trying to gain knowledge as much as I can throughout my journey. What it does: - This project solution explains how to use Microsoft Custom Vision AI to detect defects in the aircraft parts images by object detection and will be integrated with Microsoft PowerApps. How we built it: - Using Custom Vision portal to label the defects and train the tagged images and quick test could be performed to see whether the trained images have detect the defects correctly. From there, multiple iterations or trainings can be done to see which iteration of the models gave the best accuracy result. Best iterations published to predict whether it has defects or not by the images that has never been seen. Training and prediction can be done using API and Python SDK. Using Custom Vision portal, images are uploaded manually. Using training API, if there are batches of images to train, it can be be done automatically and it will start new iteration to the Custom Vision portal putting the batch images there. Terminal client app built and used for predicting the testing images. It can be seen that even the smallest dent and scratch that can't be identified with human eyes can be detected by using the prediction package of python SDK. Since the client terminal app does not have frontend UI to navigate with, another way can be done to build apps by using Power Apps. Power Apps will be connected to the API prediction resources from Custom Vision services and will be deployed to cloud. For this project, client mobile app is built by connecting to the API and deployed to cloud. Challenges we ran into: - The images for training were limited thus defect such as irregular colours that was identified could not be tagged due to Custom Vision service must have at least 15 tags for each label to be trained. When using training API and custom SDK, it was quite hard to do tagging for the region of dent and scratch. It's because after exporting to json file, the bounding box coordinates must be normalised to be able to do training for the images. I calculated in manually to get the normalised coordinates, however Custom Vision portal can adjust the label of the region and that's a great thing. It was hard to configure Microsoft Visual Object Tagging Tool ( VoTT) as well for tagging the images since I am connecting to the cloud by using Azure Blob Storage. But it's good for security of the data which is the training image I store there. I have to figure out how to connect Power Apps to Custom Vision service and in the end I try to find a way on how I could do it. I Accomplishments that we're proud of: - I am proud that I managed to detect the defects on the aircraft parts try accurately since some defects I could not even see it with my eyes. After seeing the prediction of the images, zooming on the images can be seen the detected scratch and dent defects being recognized. I felt I have accomplished something at least and for the first time building an apps and deploy to cloud. Microsoft have provided very good tools and services to be used and having experience to use them makes me happy. What we learned: - I have learned that resilience is very important in doing the hackathon and never give up even when facing some errors, there is always a way to solve it. I have learned a lot throughout all of the challenges that I faced. What's next for Aircraft_Defect_Detection_Just_Analytics_Problem_Statement_1: - It can be done for a real world scenario cases for aircraft manufacturing companies and leverage using Microsoft Custom Vision AI where a real time video of production happening and the defects could be detected during that exact time. This will really help the manufacturing companies. For my apps, it need to add more features of the bounding box region for the defects as it can only be displayed for now. This apps can be improved to be better. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/predict-default-of-next-credit-card-payment

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Problem Statement: - HCL Technologies Problem Statement 2 - credit card default Introduction: - This project intends to create a model that can predict if a customer will default the next credit card payment based on the inputs provided to the model. The accurate prediction of the next credit card default of the customer will enable financial institutions to better mitigate such risks Purpose & Motivation: - To use AI to assist financial institutions in identifying credit card customers who are not credible to allow proactive risk handling Application Details: - The model is created using Azure Machine Learning Studio. Information may be fed from other places (e.g. web services) into the model after it has been deployed and model can be automatically run. The output can then be fed to the financial institution on the customer’s classification status Difficulties & Challenges: - 1. Steep learning curve for the software - 2. Unable to create new account for the free trial after it expired despite creating new email addresses to do so Go-to-Market: - It can be available for use by financial institutions as a back-end application that automatically runs check on customers based on the model to constantly update the classification of their customers and flag out any potential high-risk customers (i.e. customers with higher risk of defaulting next credit card payment) ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/aircraft-surface-defects-identification

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Defects on aircraft products prove to be expensive, bringing more cost to the company and lower the credibility of the aircraft. What it does: - The Aircraft Surface Defect Detection System is trained to detect any defects on the image given by the company and calculate the volume of the defects detected. By doing this the company is able to analyze its product manufacturing. The analysis is then saved in csv file. How we built it: - The defect identification is trained using Custom Vision from Azure and the analysis is done using Python. Challenges we ran into: - To make the system able to load all the images given to make an analysis. The analysis can be done for one picture Accomplishments that we're proud of: - The system was able to identify defects and analysis was done to find the total volume of defects. What we learned: - With more images trained, the system will be able to give higher precision on the defect identification What's next for Aircraft Surface Defects Identification: - -More images trained,\n-Type of defects, ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/accenture-ai-spy

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - My inspiration comes from the Code; without Barriers Accenture problem statement, automating the caption for images is sometimes a struggle as thinking of a caption that conveys the image in a short and succinct manner may be more difficult than it seems. As someone who likes to think of taglines and funny captions of an image, this can be super helpful whether you are starting a caption from blank or would want more inspiration for a caption. What it does: - The web app requires an image link to be pasted in a text box, whereafter it is inserted the user can click on Get Caption!. After which, the user will be redirected to the caption generated results. This result page shows the user the caption, its confidence as well as image tags associated with the image. If the image contains a celebrity, Accenture_AI_SPY can include them in the caption as well. How I built it: - The web app was built using the Computer Vision Cognitive Service and the App Service from Azure using the APIs. The Flask framework was used to create the web development along with the programming language in Python which was all implemented through the VS code IDE. Challenges I ran into: - A challenge that was met during its development was extracting the image caption and confidence from the JSON file when requested through the API. In the beginning, the result had included both the image caption and confidence in one line surrounded by the JSON brackets [] and quotation marks ''. However, for a potential user, it is better to provide a cleaner result that is labelled separately for the image caption and its confidence respectively. This challenge was solved using arrays within a JSON file to specifically extract keys and their corresponding value, thus, the solution resulted in a cleaner and elegant presentation of the image caption and confidence respectively. Furthermore, there were times when the Accenture_AI_SPY would not provide results and instead hit an Internal Server Error, however, this was later solved as the image link pasted should be directly linked to the image and not the URL website etc. Accomplishments that I'm proud of: - Firstly, I'm proud that I was brave enough to register for this Hackathon which to me is an accomplishment on its own. Secondly, I'm proud to deliver a working application that leverages the Computer Vision Cognitive Service which has so many benefits and uses and was incorporated into the web application. Overall, I'm proud that I overcame the challenges that were presented as there were times of frustration (no doubt ), but it was definitely worth the final results! What I learned: - I've learned how to be persistent and follow my heart when it comes to developing such an application. I've learned to have fun with my project and insert myself into it with the use of colours and styles. I've also become more comfortable using Flask and Azure services and how to use them as an API for requesting the data. Overall, I've very grateful to be part of this experience, this is my first Hackathon and as someone who is just starting to get out of my shell and beginning to take the bull by the horns, it is scary, exciting, and refreshing all at the same time to build this web application to be considered in the hackathon. What's next for Accenture_AI_SPY: - The next step for Accenture_AI_SPY is to expand the extraction of an image apart from its caption and tags, the Accenture_AI_SPY can offer more fields such as: - \nDetecting contents of adult, gore or racy content which can help parents understand whether images are safe for their children or others. \nAnother potential for Accenture_AI_SPY is to extract the colours of an image which can be in separate sub-categories of extracting the dominant, accent or detecting if the image is black and white. This can be especially helpful for artists extracting the colour code as well to accurately get the colour of the image within the picture.\n Accenture_AI_SPY has the prospective of identifying the genders and ages of the people in an image (if humans are detected). This can be used by specific businesses to understand their audience or users who enter their stores.\nDetermining the category to which the image belongs can also be included in the results as this can be helpful for stores to automate the categorization of their products through the app without the need to do it manually.\nThis web app can be integrated into another website for businesses as the backend coding can be simply incorporated into their existing code.\n ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/peacesign

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - I set down with what I believed to be the most socially beneficial problem statement to fulfill my aspirations of creating solutions that promote inclusiveness and eradicate biases to help those in need live a more fulfilling life. What it does: - Developed using Microsoft Azure's own AI service and flask framework as an initiative to aid individuals with hearing impairment for Code Without Barriers problem statements, PeaceSign facilitates the translation of speech into American sign language. The web application can transcribe and convert both short sentences and videos into hand signs after receiving speech input from the user. How we built it: - To derive hand signs as an output, the model first transcribes speech into text, and with the help of this article, I was able to reach greater heights with the project and enhance the capabilities of the model to receive longer speech inputs from 30min videos after some minor adjustments to the source code. For each alphabet in the transcription, the model fires an HTTP request to get the images from the classifier trained in customvision.ai before dumping the results as a downloadable image. Challenges we ran into: - Due to time limitations imposed by the hackathon and my lack of expertise in artificial intelligence software development, the original number of features including real-time speech-to-sign translation and sign-to-speech was reduced to only short speech and video translation. It was nonetheless, a very exciting and fruitful topic to conduct research on which can have produced good results if I had better time management. - Certain functions within this project take forever to load as an HTTP request is fired for each letter in the transcription, but I have managed to reduce the time taken from an hour to less than a minute. However, I still believe there are easier ways to speed up the application loading speed e.g. with class maybe. - The incompatibility of python modules within PeaceSign also posed a huge problem in the deployment of the solution to the cloud as Azure Web only offers Linux containers for python and after several unsuccessful attempts of deployment, I managed to pin down the issue by running through the dependencies and singling out the modules that were causing container failures before replacing them with alternatives that perform the same functions. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Completing the task at hand for sure. Thanks to this hackathon, I was able to complete two certificate courses from Microsoft and grow my knowledge to achieve greater heights in my learning journey. What we learned: - The limitations and wonders of artificial intelligence, processes that can be simplified through machine learning, and services available on different platforms that can be utilized to streamline many existing functions. What's next for PeaceSign: - There are plans to migrate this project onto an android platform for extra portability in the future, though still in consideration as I am still in the process of learning and understanding Java language. If given the time and resources, I would definitely want to create a chatbot version of this project so it can easily be attached to any website for accessibility. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/keeping-our-roads-safe

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: What it does: - Globally, Every year the lives of approximately 1.3 million people are cut short as a result of a road traffic crash (WHO,2021). - The number of casualties, injuries, and deaths caused by traffic accidents each year and the significant economic costs involved make traffic accidents one of the most prominent global concerns. - Road accidents are caused by a variety of factors. If these factors can be better understood and predicted, it might be possible to take measures to mitigate the damages and their severity. How we built it: Challenges we ran into: - This is my first time to build machine learning model using Azure. It's quite a steep learning curve to implement and publish the model. In the beginning, I encountered frequent issue related to the azure account. Similarly, I dont have access to power BI due to device issue, hence I have to borrow my auntie laptop to run the analysis and visualisation on power BI. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - I'm glad and grateful for this learning opportunity and utilise my marketing insights knowledge in exploring & triangulate all possible datapoints to analyse trends of accidents. What we learned: - This case study calls for further steps in which dynamic hotspots can be identified so that this information can be used for better management of public and private resources. The effective identification of dynamic hotspots can be used in a number of use cases including allowing: What's next for Keeping our roads safe: - This current study faced several constraints, such as limited to only four databases from Injury surveillance system owned by Division of Injury Prevention, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand. I'm also planning to predict traffic accident hotspots with spatial data - The datasets focus on the injured people that have got treatment in hospitals; and disregard the fatal accidents data. For further research can be supplemented by utilising road type data for model training. This will improve the prediction of traffic accident and further enhance the accuracy of predictive models, addressing the responsible factors for accidents likely to happen. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/credit-card-defaults-hcl

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Credit card default is the serious problem in banks that affects their business growth.\nIs it possible to know the credit card defaults in early stage? \nobviously Yes What it does: - It is identify credit card defaults in early stage & then business can take appropriate actions to avoid defaults. Using data science,it helps to identify factors & associate relationships by using historical data. How I built it: - First performed descriptive analysis to identify relationships between variables & to know how these variables affected for target variable.\nAfter that performed various machine learning classification models & statistical techniques(sampling,PCA) to get better accurate model for given data set.\nUsed azure machine learning studio notebook version. Challenges I ran into: - This is the unbalanced data set because defaulted was 22.12% & not defaulted was 77.88%.\nOverall model performed sufficient accuracy but category wise recall values were insufficient in first stage because of the unbalanced issue . Accomplishments that I'm proud of: - To get scalability & accurate model, performed various data engineering techniques.\nTo solve unbalanced issue,performed various sampling techniques & final best technique is SMOTE.\nFinally identified important features using advanced analysis. What I learned: - I Learned various statistical sampling techniques & azure cloud techniques. What's next for Credit card defaults -HCL: - Next step is improving this model,by researching & applying other suitable variables.\nApplying various deep learning techniques such as deep neural networks & auto encoders. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/ai-professor-q5d9nu

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - This is my first AI project after completing the AI102 Training program. My passion towards AI learning and inspired to take part in this hackathon. I especially selected AI professor use by Accenture because it inspired me in terms of creativity. Usually people wants to search and classify documents quickly since it's a tedious process to do it manually. buy if you are an visually impaired person you have to be dependent on someone to do the work for you. That question came to my mind , if I start my project it should be beneficial to someone who is in need. What it does: - This project classifies documents into 5 categories , summarize the document , it recognizes the content title and context and differentiates, it also provides key phrases , you could filter the content by organization ,people, classification category and location. It also provides voice search and text search . Also able to read full article , and consist of content reader a voice will read the article and search results for you. How we built it: - This project is build using Azure Services, Azure Blob storage is used to upload files, azure language studio is used to classify text and NER for title recognition and trained , tested and deployed mode. The SDK is leverage to python and flask and bootstrap is used to build the UI. Azure cognitive search services used for search documents by creating index and indexer to search . Azure speech to text and text to speech services leveraged to voice search & content reader functionalities Challenges we ran into: - I faced challenge in using azure free credit, it's very calculative to handle our credit to enable various service, and there were limitation in using only a free or basic tier of each services. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Being a beginner to AI , I am proud that now I understand AI ,able to fully utilize azure platform to build an AI solution. I am familiar with python but I learnt bootstrap to build a UI. What we learned: - Learnt to explore new things, learnt to think beyond limit and how we could serve our society through AI, Learnt on being a responsible in building AI solutions. What's next for AI-PROFESSOR: - AI professor can enable text translation , add voice search on multi languages , enabling more filter options ,sort options in search , enabling option to explore several entity relationship to find how documents connect with each others content. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/image-search-1bkanq

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Advances in AI especially computer vision make a lot of benefits. one of them is the image search engine, this makes the search not only text-based. In addition, image search engines can be used for product based recommendations for example in e-commerce. What it does: - It can find similar image in database from user input image. How we built it: - Using ML to extract features from the input image and measures the distance of the features with the features of the image database. So that it can find similar image in database from user input image. Challenges we ran into: - -Got many errors during model deployment in the cloud, so it's still not deployed in the cloud. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - -Using AI to do image search What we learned: - Tensorflow, Azure Machine Learning What's next for Vision COP: Image Search Engine (Image.search): - Since the dataset used only CBIR dataset, which contains animal images, the model can't find similar images if it used for searching other objects. the more database images will be beneficial so it can used widely. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/string-reverse

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: What it does: - Displays the entered string in reverse order ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/reverse-a-string

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - The available challenges in LHD page What it does: - Reverses a string How we built it: - Uses fundamental concepts Challenges we ran into: - -- ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/rpsls-bot

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Sheldon Cooper from The Big Bang Theory. What it does: - Python bot to play Rock Paper Scissors Lizard Spock. How we built it: - Python Challenges we ran into: - remembering what kills what Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Fully working What we learned: What's next for RPSLS Bot: - Nothing :D ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/rock-paper-scissors-nyh9gx

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: What it does: - The computer randomly selects either rock, paper or scissors against the human and checks who won\nbased on the rule:\nRock > Scissors\nScissors > Paper\nPaper > Rock ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/string-reversal

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: What it does: - Reverses a string with a single line of python code How it works: - Uses slicing in python in order to reverse the string How to use: - \nRun the python file\nEnter the string you wish to reverse\n ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback: