Beyonder-4x7B-v2 / README.md
leaderboard-pr-bot's picture
Adding Evaluation Results
4985d4e verified
|
raw
history blame
12.3 kB
metadata
license: other
tags:
  - moe
  - merge
  - mergekit
  - Mistral
  - openchat/openchat-3.5-1210
  - beowolx/CodeNinja-1.0-OpenChat-7B
  - maywell/PiVoT-0.1-Starling-LM-RP
  - WizardLM/WizardMath-7B-V1.1
license_name: microsoft-research-license
license_link: https://huggingface.co/WizardLM/WizardMath-7B-V1.1/resolve/main/LICENSE
model-index:
  - name: Beyonder-4x7B-v2
    results:
      - task:
          type: text-generation
          name: Text Generation
        dataset:
          name: AI2 Reasoning Challenge (25-Shot)
          type: ai2_arc
          config: ARC-Challenge
          split: test
          args:
            num_few_shot: 25
        metrics:
          - type: acc_norm
            value: 68.77
            name: normalized accuracy
        source:
          url: >-
            https://huggingface.co/spaces/HuggingFaceH4/open_llm_leaderboard?query=mlabonne/Beyonder-4x7B-v2
          name: Open LLM Leaderboard
      - task:
          type: text-generation
          name: Text Generation
        dataset:
          name: HellaSwag (10-Shot)
          type: hellaswag
          split: validation
          args:
            num_few_shot: 10
        metrics:
          - type: acc_norm
            value: 86.8
            name: normalized accuracy
        source:
          url: >-
            https://huggingface.co/spaces/HuggingFaceH4/open_llm_leaderboard?query=mlabonne/Beyonder-4x7B-v2
          name: Open LLM Leaderboard
      - task:
          type: text-generation
          name: Text Generation
        dataset:
          name: MMLU (5-Shot)
          type: cais/mmlu
          config: all
          split: test
          args:
            num_few_shot: 5
        metrics:
          - type: acc
            value: 65.1
            name: accuracy
        source:
          url: >-
            https://huggingface.co/spaces/HuggingFaceH4/open_llm_leaderboard?query=mlabonne/Beyonder-4x7B-v2
          name: Open LLM Leaderboard
      - task:
          type: text-generation
          name: Text Generation
        dataset:
          name: TruthfulQA (0-shot)
          type: truthful_qa
          config: multiple_choice
          split: validation
          args:
            num_few_shot: 0
        metrics:
          - type: mc2
            value: 60.68
        source:
          url: >-
            https://huggingface.co/spaces/HuggingFaceH4/open_llm_leaderboard?query=mlabonne/Beyonder-4x7B-v2
          name: Open LLM Leaderboard
      - task:
          type: text-generation
          name: Text Generation
        dataset:
          name: Winogrande (5-shot)
          type: winogrande
          config: winogrande_xl
          split: validation
          args:
            num_few_shot: 5
        metrics:
          - type: acc
            value: 80.9
            name: accuracy
        source:
          url: >-
            https://huggingface.co/spaces/HuggingFaceH4/open_llm_leaderboard?query=mlabonne/Beyonder-4x7B-v2
          name: Open LLM Leaderboard
      - task:
          type: text-generation
          name: Text Generation
        dataset:
          name: GSM8k (5-shot)
          type: gsm8k
          config: main
          split: test
          args:
            num_few_shot: 5
        metrics:
          - type: acc
            value: 71.72
            name: accuracy
        source:
          url: >-
            https://huggingface.co/spaces/HuggingFaceH4/open_llm_leaderboard?query=mlabonne/Beyonder-4x7B-v2
          name: Open LLM Leaderboard

Beyonder-4x7B-v2

This model is a Mixture of Experts (MoE) made with mergekit (mixtral branch). It uses the following base models:

The recommended context length is 8k.

⚡ Quantized models

Thanks to TheBloke for the quantized models:

🏆 Evaluation

Beyonder-4x7B-v2 is competitive with Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1 on the Open LLM Leaderboard, while only having 4 experts instead of 8.

It also displays a significant improvement over the individual experts.

It also performs very well compared to other models on Nous benchmark suite. It's almost as good as the best Yi-34B fine-tune, which is a much bigger model: 24.2B parameters + only two experts are selected during inference (so ~12B) vs. 34B param.

Model AGIEval GPT4All TruthfulQA Bigbench Average
Beyonder-4x7B-v2 45.29 75.95 60.86 46.4 57.13
NeuralHermes-2.5-Mistral-7B 43.67 73.24 55.37 41.76 53.51
OpenHermes-2.5-Mistral-7B 42.75 72.99 52.99 40.94 52.42
Nous-Hermes-2-SOLAR-10.7B 47.79 74.69 55.92 44.84 55.81
Nous-Hermes-2-Yi-34B 50.27 76.00 60.34 46.69 58.33

AGIEval

Task Version Metric Value Stderr
agieval_aqua_rat 0 acc 23.62 ± 2.67
acc_norm 23.62 ± 2.67
agieval_logiqa_en 0 acc 41.47 ± 1.93
acc_norm 43.01 ± 1.94
agieval_lsat_ar 0 acc 23.04 ± 2.78
acc_norm 23.48 ± 2.80
agieval_lsat_lr 0 acc 51.57 ± 2.22
acc_norm 52.94 ± 2.21
agieval_lsat_rc 0 acc 64.31 ± 2.93
acc_norm 64.68 ± 2.92
agieval_sat_en 0 acc 79.13 ± 2.84
acc_norm 79.13 ± 2.84
agieval_sat_en_without_passage 0 acc 43.20 ± 3.46
acc_norm 43.20 ± 3.46
agieval_sat_math 0 acc 34.55 ± 3.21
acc_norm 32.27 ± 3.16

GPT4All

Task Version Metric Value Stderr
arc_challenge 0 acc 61.86 ± 1.42
acc_norm 64.51 ± 1.40
arc_easy 0 acc 85.06 ± 0.73
acc_norm 82.45 ± 0.78
boolq 1 acc 88.35 ± 0.56
hellaswag 0 acc 68.04 ± 0.47
acc_norm 85.12 ± 0.36
openbookqa 0 acc 37.80 ± 2.17
acc_norm 48.60 ± 2.24
piqa 0 acc 83.08 ± 0.87
acc_norm 83.95 ± 0.86
winogrande 0 acc 78.69 ± 1.15

TruthfulQA

Task Version Metric Value Stderr
truthfulqa_mc 1 mc1 44.55 ± 1.74
mc2 60.86 ± 1.57

Bigbench

Task Version Metric Value Stderr
bigbench_causal_judgement 0 multiple_choice_grade 58.95 ± 3.58
bigbench_date_understanding 0 multiple_choice_grade 66.40 ± 2.46
bigbench_disambiguation_qa 0 multiple_choice_grade 48.84 ± 3.12
bigbench_geometric_shapes 0 multiple_choice_grade 22.56 ± 2.21
exact_str_match 13.37 ± 1.80
bigbench_logical_deduction_five_objects 0 multiple_choice_grade 30.40 ± 2.06
bigbench_logical_deduction_seven_objects 0 multiple_choice_grade 20.57 ± 1.53
bigbench_logical_deduction_three_objects 0 multiple_choice_grade 52.00 ± 2.89
bigbench_movie_recommendation 0 multiple_choice_grade 44.40 ± 2.22
bigbench_navigate 0 multiple_choice_grade 52.10 ± 1.58
bigbench_reasoning_about_colored_objects 0 multiple_choice_grade 69.75 ± 1.03
bigbench_ruin_names 0 multiple_choice_grade 55.36 ± 2.35
bigbench_salient_translation_error_detection 0 multiple_choice_grade 23.65 ± 1.35
bigbench_snarks 0 multiple_choice_grade 77.35 ± 3.12
bigbench_sports_understanding 0 multiple_choice_grade 73.02 ± 1.41
bigbench_temporal_sequences 0 multiple_choice_grade 46.80 ± 1.58
bigbench_tracking_shuffled_objects_five_objects 0 multiple_choice_grade 22.08 ± 1.17
bigbench_tracking_shuffled_objects_seven_objects 0 multiple_choice_grade 19.03 ± 0.94
bigbench_tracking_shuffled_objects_three_objects 0 multiple_choice_grade 52.00 ± 2.89

🧩 Configuration

base_model: mlabonne/Marcoro14-7B-slerp
experts:
  - source_model: openchat/openchat-3.5-1210
    positive_prompts:
    - "chat"
    - "assistant"
    - "tell me"
    - "explain"
  - source_model: beowolx/CodeNinja-1.0-OpenChat-7B
    positive_prompts:
    - "code"
    - "python"
    - "javascript"
    - "programming"
    - "algorithm"
  - source_model: maywell/PiVoT-0.1-Starling-LM-RP
    positive_prompts:
    - "storywriting"
    - "write"
    - "scene"
    - "story"
    - "character"
  - source_model: WizardLM/WizardMath-7B-V1.1
    positive_prompts:
    - "reason"
    - "math"
    - "mathematics"
    - "solve"
    - "count"

💻 Usage

Here's a notebook to run this model in 4-bit precision using a free T4 GPU on Google Colab.

!pip install -qU transformers bitsandbytes accelerate

from transformers import AutoTokenizer
import transformers
import torch

model = "mlabonne/Beyonder-4x7B-v2"

tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model)
pipeline = transformers.pipeline(
    "text-generation",
    model=model,
    model_kwargs={"torch_dtype": torch.float16, "load_in_4bit": True},
)

messages = [{"role": "user", "content": "Explain what a Mixture of Experts is in less than 100 words."}]
prompt = pipeline.tokenizer.apply_chat_template(messages, tokenize=False, add_generation_prompt=True)
outputs = pipeline(prompt, max_new_tokens=256, do_sample=True, temperature=0.7, top_k=50, top_p=0.95)
print(outputs[0]["generated_text"])

Output:

A Mixture of Experts (ME) is a machine learning technique that combines multiple expert models to make predictions or decisions. Each expert model is specialized in a different aspect of the problem, and their outputs are combined to produce a more accurate and robust solution. This approach allows the model to leverage the strengths of individual experts and compensate for their weaknesses, improving overall performance.

Open LLM Leaderboard Evaluation Results

Detailed results can be found here

Metric Value
Avg. 72.33
AI2 Reasoning Challenge (25-Shot) 68.77
HellaSwag (10-Shot) 86.80
MMLU (5-Shot) 65.10
TruthfulQA (0-shot) 60.68
Winogrande (5-shot) 80.90
GSM8k (5-shot) 71.72