mradermacher/falcon-180B-i1-GGUF

About

weighted/imatrix quants of https://huggingface.co/tiiuae/falcon-180B

Usage

If you are unsure how to use GGUF files, refer to one of TheBloke's READMEs for more details, including on how to concatenate multi-part files.

Provided Quants

(sorted by size, not necessarily quality. IQ-quants are often preferable over similar sized non-IQ quants)

Link	Type	Size/GB	Notes
GGUF	i1-IQ1_S	38.4	for the desperate
GGUF	i1-IQ1_M	42.0	mostly desperate
GGUF	i1-IQ2_XXS	47.9
PART 1 PART 2	i1-IQ2_XS	53.1
PART 1 PART 2	i1-IQ2_S	56.6
PART 1 PART 2	i1-IQ2_M	61.3
PART 1 PART 2	i1-Q2_K	66.9	IQ3_XXS probably better
PART 1 PART 2	i1-IQ3_XXS	69.5	lower quality
PART 1 PART 2	i1-IQ3_XS	75.4
PART 1 PART 2	i1-IQ3_S	77.9	beats Q3_K*
PART 1 PART 2	i1-Q3_K_S	77.9	IQ3_XS probably better
PART 1 PART 2	i1-IQ3_M	81.5
PART 1 PART 2	i1-Q3_K_M	85.6	IQ3_S probably better
PART 1 PART 2	i1-Q3_K_L	92.1	IQ3_M probably better
PART 1 PART 2	i1-IQ4_XS	96.0
PART 1 PART 2 PART 3	i1-Q4_K_S	101.6	optimal size/speed/quality
PART 1 PART 2 PART 3	i1-Q4_0	102.1	fast, low quality
PART 1 PART 2 PART 3	i1-Q4_K_M	108.9	fast, recommended
PART 1 PART 2 PART 3	i1-Q5_K_S	123.9
PART 1 PART 2 PART 3	i1-Q5_K_M	131.1
PART 1 PART 2 PART 3	i1-Q6_K	147.6	practically like static Q6_K

Here is a handy graph by ikawrakow comparing some lower-quality quant types (lower is better):

And here are Artefact2's thoughts on the matter: https://gist.github.com/Artefact2/b5f810600771265fc1e39442288e8ec9

FAQ / Model Request

See https://huggingface.co/mradermacher/model_requests for some answers to questions you might have and/or if you want some other model quantized.

Thanks

I thank my company, nethype GmbH, for letting me use its servers and providing upgrades to my workstation to enable this work in my free time. Additional thanks to @nicoboss for giving me access to his private supercomputer, enabling me to provide many more imatrix quants, at much higher quality, than I would otherwise be able to.