Instructions to use nvidia/Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B with libraries, inference providers, notebooks, and local apps. Follow these links to get started.
- Libraries
- Transformers
How to use nvidia/Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B with Transformers:
# Use a pipeline as a high-level helper from transformers import pipeline pipe = pipeline("text-generation", model="nvidia/Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B", trust_remote_code=True) messages = [ {"role": "user", "content": "Who are you?"}, ] pipe(messages)# Load model directly from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForCausalLM tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("nvidia/Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B", trust_remote_code=True) model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("nvidia/Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B", trust_remote_code=True) messages = [ {"role": "user", "content": "Who are you?"}, ] inputs = tokenizer.apply_chat_template( messages, add_generation_prompt=True, tokenize=True, return_dict=True, return_tensors="pt", ).to(model.device) outputs = model.generate(**inputs, max_new_tokens=40) print(tokenizer.decode(outputs[0][inputs["input_ids"].shape[-1]:])) - Notebooks
- Google Colab
- Kaggle
- Local Apps
- vLLM
How to use nvidia/Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B with vLLM:
Install from pip and serve model
# Install vLLM from pip: pip install vllm # Start the vLLM server: vllm serve "nvidia/Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B" # Call the server using curl (OpenAI-compatible API): curl -X POST "http://localhost:8000/v1/chat/completions" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ --data '{ "model": "nvidia/Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B", "messages": [ { "role": "user", "content": "What is the capital of France?" } ] }'Use Docker
docker model run hf.co/nvidia/Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B
- SGLang
How to use nvidia/Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B with SGLang:
Install from pip and serve model
# Install SGLang from pip: pip install sglang # Start the SGLang server: python3 -m sglang.launch_server \ --model-path "nvidia/Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B" \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 30000 # Call the server using curl (OpenAI-compatible API): curl -X POST "http://localhost:30000/v1/chat/completions" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ --data '{ "model": "nvidia/Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B", "messages": [ { "role": "user", "content": "What is the capital of France?" } ] }'Use Docker images
docker run --gpus all \ --shm-size 32g \ -p 30000:30000 \ -v ~/.cache/huggingface:/root/.cache/huggingface \ --env "HF_TOKEN=<secret>" \ --ipc=host \ lmsysorg/sglang:latest \ python3 -m sglang.launch_server \ --model-path "nvidia/Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B" \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 30000 # Call the server using curl (OpenAI-compatible API): curl -X POST "http://localhost:30000/v1/chat/completions" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ --data '{ "model": "nvidia/Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B", "messages": [ { "role": "user", "content": "What is the capital of France?" } ] }' - Docker Model Runner
How to use nvidia/Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B with Docker Model Runner:
docker model run hf.co/nvidia/Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B
Cascade-2 cheating attempts on Math is... cute
I was doing some inference of this model on a subset of harder problems from Nemotron-Math-V2, hoping to get a decent dataset for fun. I noticed that this model created a bunch of unrelated files in the sandbox folder (which is not network isolated in my case foolishly):
It downloaded IMO2021SL.pdf, imo2022sl.pdf and so on. I opened those files and they were legitimate PDF files. Which means the model tried to cheat by downloading those files 😄 Here are the statistics of network access attempts (out of 10K reasoning traces):
| Domain | Traces |
|---|---|
| artofproblemsolving.com | 64 |
| en.wikipedia.org | 58 |
| www.google.com | 40 |
| duckduckgo.com | 39 |
| oeis.org | 28 |
| math.stackexchange.com | 13 |
| api.stackexchange.com | 12 |
| www.imo-official.org | 11 |
| html.duckduckgo.com | 11 |
| raw.githubusercontent.com | 8 |
| api.duckduckgo.com | 6 |
| mathworld.wolfram.com | 6 |
| purplecomet.org | 5 |
| api.github.com | 3 |
| arxiv.org | 3 |
| www.bing.com | 3 |
| stackoverflow.com | 3 |
The cutest part is that in most of these cheating attempts, it fails to produce the correct answer. Here are in-depth analysis together with exported reasoning traces with tool use: https://huggingface.co/datasets/chankhavu/nemotron-cascade2-cheating-attempts (analysis was done by Claude Code)
Thanks for the analysis. We did not use tool calls for IMO/IOI evaluation.
@chankhavu
Thanks for providing the examples. We’ve observed similar behaviors before. We believe this stems from our SFT training data, generated by DeepSeek-V3.2 and GPT-OSS with tool calls, which includes trajectories involving network access attempts. Most of these are hallucinations and fail to produce correct answers.
Just to emphasize:
For benchmark evaluations , including IMO 2025 and IOI 2025, we disable tool calls and do not allow the model to access the network, to rule out any possibility of cheating attempts.