Datasets:

SummerSigh

/

PolicyData

like 0

Please do not add empty sections to articles as you did to Oberon Zell-Ravenheart. Since several styles of citation are permitted by WP:CITE, and not all of them use a notes section, adding such an empty section is rather presumptive on your part in an article of which you are not one of the regular editors. WP:CITE clearly states that it is the regular editors of the article who get to decide which of several citation methods will be used. Some of these use inline citations without footnotes... Please read WP:CITE more closely and don't assume that a particular form of citation must be used. —

Text edits I made a start on editing the text for clarity, flow, encyclopedic style, etc. I trust the article's established editors to keep a close eye on my changes and correct any errors of fact that might be accidentally introduced. Thank you, those of you who have already made corrections.

I specifically bring to your attention Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser#Rules of use Rule 3: Do not make insignificant or inconsequential edits. An edit that has no noticeable effect on the rendered page is generally considered an insignificant edit. If in doubt, or if other editors object to edits on the basis of this rule, seek consensus at an appropriate venue before making further edits. Running AWB in General Fixes mode, without any other activity, falls into this classification. The rate you are editing makes it clear you are not reviewing your changes, and it certainly seems you are running without any alternative edits planned. You have been warned. Josh Parris

This discussion isn't going anywhere. I'm unprotecting the page. Just keep in mind that any violations of the Wikipedia:Three revert rule will be enforced from here on out. Also, Ted, in having useful discussions, please don't rely solely on the fact that your adversary is ANONYNMOUS to discredit them. Please stick to the facts. If you insist on removing the guardian link, at least give a reason why. (talk) 20:24, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)

Done, but most of the information is duplicated between the two wellness articles. Added some to health .

I don't think that's necessarily true, but what do you suggest? Assuming some sceintists and other scientists are off the table, how can we best convey the information in summary form in the lede? Cheers,

" Regarding ""Any Unix implementation of tmpfile is probably reentrant"", that was just a hunch, as I admittedly don't know enough about Unix to say that with confidence. And precisely for this reason I did not say that in the main article. If you see that conversation, I was justifying why I wrote in the article that ""GNU tmpfile is reentrant"" which is obviously too system-specific. It was precisely because I don't know if other implementations are reentrant, and the only objective thing I can say is that GNU tmpfile is reentrant. "

" Thankyou, TheIndividualist and Intangible. duck talk FrancisTyers moving my edit to another article That was real cute, FrancisTyers, moving my edit to another article thereby getting it out of the way of this communisto-anarchist article and taking credit for my research at the same time. Clever. BTW, how many edits did you make on Sunday the 23rd, Francis? Let me count..uh 1, 2, 3, 4....9 edits in one day. You could get blocked for that if I'm not mistaken. I may be wrong but I believe there's a WP:3RR rule. Oh well, happy editing! duck talk "

This was me. Please don't block the IP. The others weren't me. Reblock this account if you need to. -

" ""Some kid on YouTube"" probably isn't the best person to ask. If anything, only time will tell it a teaser does show up before Jumper. 3:16 "

(UTC) read some engine engineering books. you can't simply compare a turbo-diesel or a turbo-petrol to a normally aspirated petrol engine. seriously, get a clue. the pentastar is an excellent piece of kit. 76.89.129.139 21:31, 26 February 2011

How can I delete How can I delete Hello, sorry to bother you, but could you tell how can I fully delete a page. I accidently create two page that are same and while I can remove the material by editing the title of page and the page itself stays open. How can I delete this page.

" 1998 Draw Entrant Order Eliminated by TimeCactus JackChainsaw CharlieChainsaw CharlieMankind25:19Tom BrandiCactus Jack and Chainsaw CharlieThe Rock28Austin51:32MoshKurrgan13:09Phineas Godwinn12Henry28:488-Ball14Austin30:43Blackjack Bradshaw15Dude Love 35:45Owen Hart10 Triple H and Chyna12:0010Steve BlackmanKurrgan11D'Lo Brown16Faarooq32:2112Kurrgan8-Ball, Phinneas Godwinn, Bradshaw and Shamrock13Marc Mero13Austin19:4014Ken ShamrockRock15Thrasher18Austin28:0816MankindTAFKAG 17The Artist Formerly Known As Goldust23Chainz26:0418Jeff JarrettHart1917Vader19:5520 Ahmed Johnson11Henry and Brown21Mark Henry25Faarooq19:0722Skull-No showed as he was unable to compete23Kama Mustafa19Austin13:5824Steve AustinWINNER15:5825Henry Godwinn2211:3226Savio Vega20Austin27Faarooq27Rock12:0528Dude Love26Faarooq29Chainz24Austin30Vader21TAFKAG Triple H and Chyna were not entrants in the Royal Rumble Match."

i dont care anymore i am going to continue unless there is justice bye 86.151.123.189

Hi!!!= Hi I am new to wikipedia and would like to get laid! Please help me find some good girls!!! Peace

other stuff that shouldn't really be on my front page. Though I don't know why. Doesn't matter anyway Blah! http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1132/is_n10_v48/ai_19344901

Awe, An' Thou beast an expert in personal attacks.

"Italic text""That said, consensus is not simple agreement; a handful of editors agreeing on something does not constitute a consensus, except in the thinnest sense. Consensus is a broader process where specific points of article content are considered in terms of the article as a whole, and in terms of the article's place in the encyclopedia, in the hope that editors will negotiate a reasonable balance between competing views, as well as with the practical necessities of writing an encyclopedia and legal and ethical restrictions.""Italic text Thanks for giving me more proof that I'm right, Libs. "

Beyond the atrocities commited, it is true that EAM's cultural sector (Yannis Ritsos among others worked for it) was functioning in Athens and the countryside offering to peasants access to goods they couldn't enjoy before.

" Yahel, your edit was not legit. In that your POV and bias is displayed so blatantly through your edits, it is clear that you do not have the ability to constructively edit these various race articles. Now no long-standing editor but me seems to be disputing it on that page, so I think I have a consensus for my edit. You do not have consensus. I, a long-standing editor (not that my time here is relevant) am disputing your edit. There is a lengthy consensus on the talk page of the article which specifically addresses this very change you're making. So, in that, you are editing against the established consensus. Considering consensus can change, you need to discuss your thoughts on the talk page in order to attempt to achieve that. Merely making the change against consensus and hoping no one notices or bothers to comment is not acceptable. Additionally, your edit in this article and your edit on White supremacy are contradictory to one another. Both are racist ideologies and both should word it as such. ''''''Love "

" Dear Sir, I do not know what ""moderators"" you are talking about, but I would likely be one of them, and the last time I heard, the administrative corps - and particularly myself - had an extremely low tolerance for nationalist revert-warriors. Maps are maps. The last time I heard, they are geographic tools, not political ones, and it makes zero sense for the article itself to state ""Armenia is part of Southeast Asia"", and then for the map to show it as part of Europe. If you actually come up with some reliable sources that place Armenia inside Europe, I will be thrilled. Until then, kindly stop revert-warring and trying to bully Dbachmann like you managed to bully others above; the alternative is to get page-banned under WP:ARBAA2. Thank you. "

I think any kind of source from the published realm would be suitable here. Indeed Kirklees MBC must have a source themselves. I wonder if there is actually something kept more centrally in the UK on these matters - I'm thinking the UK national archives?

You could always leave your basement and venture into the real world. Have you ever thought about that? )

That put aside what does the 818 symbolize? I heard it was some Nazi thing Elven6 July 19 UTC

Requested moves Schism → Schism (religion) → – WP:PRIMARYTOPIC

" Right as it's more suitable here. →Talk to me!→ "

Exactly, the indictment won't affect whether or not Greg Abbott serves his term. 199.80.70.66

No problem, as long as you recognize that you are wrong. 05:04, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)

moved discussion on origin The following was inserted into the article by user:144.132.100.183 I do not dispute that Jack Dyer is credited with inventing the drop punt. Hugh Hinks invented the Drop Punt in 1907. Page 342 & 347 ì In The Beginning There Was Carisbrookî by Daryl McLeish, 2001. TABTAB Despite claims to the contrary Carlton believed that Horrie Clover invented the drop punt. Teammate Newton Chandler believed that Clover first saw the kick used by a teammate at Carisbrook and that he perfected it from there. 6th Edition The Encyclopedia of AFL Footballers. TABTAB Len Metherell, who made his debut in 1930, see 6th Edition The Encyclopedia of AFL Footballers, certainly used the drop punt, and indicated that he had learned it from his father. With the retirement of Dyer in 1949 the drop punt gradually fell into disuse. When Bartle, of Geelong, took a spectacular mark five meters from goal in 1958 and kicked a behind, the Geelong advertiser admonishes: he foolishly tried a drop punt. 3AW Book of Footy Records 1989 page195/6 TABTAB Interestingly Jack Dyer commenced with Richmond in 1931 and would have played against Clover and Metherell. TABTAB Next recorded use was by the Collier Brothers see Page 195 3AW Book of Footy Records. TABTAB Next recorded use was by Jack Dyer. The Sporting Globe FOOTBALL Book 1948. TABTAB Page 49: Jack Dyer gets goals with the sillies looking kick in football history. TABTAB Jack Dyer adapted the Collier Brothers of Collingwood’s Drop Punt, which they used as a short pass of around ten yards in place of a hand pass. They only used it to pass the ball to each other over the head of an opponent. See page 165, Jack Dyer Captain Blood as told to Brian Hanson, Paul, (London), 1965. TABTAB Interesting note. TABTAB The drop punt had a slow take-up by teams: Dyer himself attributed this to TABTAB Coaches do no teach this kick to their players for one reason. They cannot do it and have never bothered to learn its fundamentals Football Clinic, p.167 Captain Blood, Jack Dyer. As told to Brian Hansen, Paul, (London), 1965. TAB I cannot find any information that records that Jack Dyer actually was the first. I have reworded the article slightly to reflect this, but when you are talking about things that happened 70-100 years ago, we'll never get a definitive answer, so have to just go by the reliable sources, even if they contradict each other to a degree.

" assistance I seek administrator assistance. User:Emerson7 monitors my edits and reverts them whevener he feels like it. In the articles ""List of billionaires (2006)"" and ""List of billionaires (2007)"" he reverts my addition of the Lebanese flag next to Carlos Slim Helu's name, and does it sometimes with using an IP instead of his username. Get him off my back, if you will. As much as it may bother ""Emerson"", Carlos Slim Helu's parents are both Lebanese, his holds the Lebanese citizenship and visits his country very often. "

" Cleanup urgently needed Urgent request for Wikipedia admin to cleanup this article - either stick to the facts or delete article. The Ronald Ryan article is full of alleged unproven hearsay ... ""Ryan said that, Ryan did that, Ryan admitted to that, Ryan confessed to that, Ryan told him/her this and that. All these unproven stories are most unprofessional and unethical, as are the personal opinions/views of certain named people. These are simply not the facts! Why are the ""referenced facts"" on Ryan continually being vandalized, altered, manipulated, and often deleted by User:Purrum and replaced with unproven made-up allegations? Fact is that what Ryan is alleged to have said to whom has never been proven, confirmed nor recorded - there is no evidence anywhere! The facts are that there was a total lack of scientific ballistic forensic evidence to prove Ryan guilty. the factual serious ambiguities in the case, the factual dire inconsistencies of all eyewitnesses' evidence, the missing pieces of vital evidence that also could not be scientifically tested, the fact that only Paterson's one single fired shot was heard by all persons. and the most unusual pleas by jury members not to execute Ryan (maybe they had second thoughts about Ryan's guilt). Finally, the fact that the public heard Brosnan's comments on ABC Australia National Radio in 2007 ... I don't know who's shot killed who! ... which should have put an end to all the unproven allegations still being made about Ryan confessing guilt. Brosnan clearly stated that he did not know who's bullet killed who. Thgey were Brosnan's own words on national radio and he never said Ryan confessed guilt at all. 60.224.64.166 "

ANI A query regarding your apparent violation of WP:CANVASS has been posted at WP:AN/I. Cheers.

1998 World Cup Edit It was an accident, I meant to click a different area, sorry about that

P.S. I went ahead and pasted in the two sentences about Happy Valley, since there certainly should be something about Happy Valley in the article.

What about Australia? Purely out of curiosity, what is the legal status in Australia?

Stuff like that is often a remnant of ye olden days of Wikipedia, when there was far fewer rules and far, far fewer people roaming about looking for opportunities to enforce them.

That actually sounds quite reasonable. Keep in mind that I've been blocked largely to prevent me from participating in discussions that were already underway off-Wikipedia before I was blocked. It's refreshing to see some true civility for a change. Especially after having had four different admins block me (actually, it's probably more than the last four), without one word of discussion with me from any of them before doing so. Then there's the whole thing about much of the discussion not being aboveboard, but rather taking place in the modern version of the proverbial smoke-filled back room. Duk and Haukur were decent, and know more about what they're talking about because we've been involved in the same discussions at various times in the past; even I've locked horns with both of them at various times, we've managed to come out of it without permanent hard feelings (can't say that for everyone else involved). Mostly, however, what I've much of anything not even remotely resembling civility, in this entire process. At least not anything close to civility in anything other than a highly ritualized, magic-incantation, Wikipedia-jargon meaning of that term. It's no wonder that so many of them never use that word without linking it; it has nothing whatsoever to do with real-world concepts of civility as they use it. Your proposal was so much in a different vein that it catches me by surprise. The fact that I am surprised might be a cause for concern.

Progressive Party I've reverted your additions to Progressive Party (United States, 1912) because you haven't provided a reliable source for your statements about Cecilia Toro. Until you do, those statements will not stay in the article. Given that no such person is listed as a Resident Commissioner of Puerto Rico, I suspect you're perpetrating a hoax. If you aren't, I suggest you explain what you're talking about on the article's talk page (Talk:Progressive Party (United States, 1912)).

Self-published articles or publicity

" Plagiarism I deleted the page which you created for Indian ""remakes"". Such trivial lists are not appropriate on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. If you want to start a new discussion, you are welcome to do so. Thank you, • Talk2me "

Hello, From Nabbobhai - About Cialis (Cialis Drug History) I'm new to Wikipedia, and I recently added a paragraph to wikipedia about Cialis. I just checked the wikipedia and saw that the contribution I made to the wikipedia requires citation. I'm not sure how to site my contribution properly because I tried a numerous times to add the link to the source, but someone always removes it, probably you. So, could you please help me in properly citing the paragraph, or maybe you could add the source for me. I acquired the information from the following website, (www.buydrugs247.com). Thank you for your help. Oh yeah, my name is Nabeel Rahman, and I'm looking forward to learn how to properly use wikipedia. Err.. you can find a better source then buydrugs247.com. That site exists to sell something. Try to find an academic source to add. Try using a search engine, you can and should find better and more reliable sources —— Eagle (ask me for help)

" There are plenty of places where I'm being discussed, by editors who have been highly involved, you see just a tiny sample of that above. I prefer not to respond, generally, it is when I see serious harm being done in conjunction with it that I become tempted to respond. So as a question, would I have been allowed to respond to the comments above about me? (Not ""would it be wise,"" that's a different question, but allowed.) No rush. Thanks. "

" Welcome to the crazy world of Cyrillic. Reference to your claim about different spelling. Tundja or Tundzha, etc, etc. Municipality website spells the village name as source Wiki. Perhaps their jest on a nation whom refuses to check, check and check again. The first link is a correct spelling for the village, present the spelling is with ""zh"" and the new Cyrillic sign posts are shortened as metal theft was a problem, that's removed now that a population no access to scrap yards. On street view, attain lots of vines, many kms of vines a fact. One could from that perhaps then conclude a winery existence? This is the case. The Novinite article is factual, that winery was modernized. Your claim of ""That first link is to a different village of similar spelling which is in the same city,"" Display these similar named villages. Again are using your power, I think this is abuse? Back-up your statement, please."

Many thanks, Jack. So soothing and refreshing!

Do research... useful links: http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%22Centre+for+Appropriate+Technology%22+canada&start;=0&ie;=utf-8&oe;=utf-8 One Sky - The Canadian Institute of Sustainable Living - One Sky furthers appropriate technology systems, such as strawbale constructions and pedal- powered technologies, and is focusing on renewable energy at the local, national and international levels. The Salvadoran Centre for Appropriate Technology (CESTA) - is located in San Salvador, El Salvador under the leadership of Dr. Ricardo Navarro, the chair of Friends of the Earth International. Along with CESTA and the Sierra Club of B.C., we are promoting appropriate technology for landmines victims. (check spanish wikipedia). Canada’s recent International Policy Statement includes an opening comment on development: “Canadians cannot be safe in an unstable world, or healthy in a sick world; nor can we expect to remain prosperous in a poor world.”

Why is this section even here? The incident isn't noteworhy and the section should be deleted. 192.148.117.79

Louielim2007 I am suspecting louielim2007 as a sock puppet of jorbyma2007. He is currenty vandalising the Yuri Gagarin page.

Reply to Berean Hunter. Hi I found the source here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Trenton And for the battle of New Orleans I saw the source on the History Channel Documentary: First Invasion War of 1812.

What analysis recovered Stegosaurus and Emausaurus as closer to each other than Ankylosaurus? AFAIK, Stegosaurus and Ankylosaurus have been recovered as closer to each other than Emausaurus.

This section should be removed there are millions of web pages and a lot of them have heavy traffic too, this page adds no value.

Then again Alliance Unichem only covers 1997, We've been around alot longer than that. And we override the European head office I just Veto'd one of their decisions myself, since European decisions do not always benefit the UK.

Xnacional starting it up again I don't want to let things get out of hand again, but Xnacional immediately started reverting to his preferred (and incorrect) version when he returned from his block. I've restored the consensus version, but I doubt this is the end of it from him.

" I tried to walk away, but he kept following and harassing. I had just written a new article that was ready to go online, but that is now blocked. And the templates with links to disambiguation pages (my personal niche more or less), stay as sloppy as they are. Only because someone got angry over the fact that I requested a review of a notability tag for a restaurant with two Michelin stars... talk "

" Error becoming acceptable The most common error that I see regarding the use or misuse of the plural noun is the use of the word ""emails."" Email, meaning electronic mail, is both singular and plural. Someone may receive one piece of mail (email) or many pieces of mail (email). Since it would be incorrect to say, ""I received lots of ""mails"", it is just as incorrect to say, ""I received lots of ""emails."" The problem I see with this is that the use of ""emails"" has spawned a growing acceptance of the misuse of plural nouns in general. It is amazing to see in both the written and spoken word, how educated people increasingly misuse the plural noun. For example; take some time, on any given day, and listen to the dribble that comes out of the mouths of news reporters. It is atrocious what you will hear when you are paying attention. I wonder where it will end? Robert Brandon, Fl"

SagMab, will you please stop reinserting the claim that the retired London antique dealer is the same person as the artist from Seattle. Yes, they have the same name. I have the same as this guy, but I assure you it isn't me. What makes you come to the unlikely conclusion that they are one and the same?

" There was a lengthy discussion here (n.b., I'm not joking when I say ""lenghty"", please be careful if attempting to read it all) where some editors involved agreed that citing the film as a primary source is acceptable and others did not. There is a template (Template:Cite video) that can be used to cite a video available though a URL but, obviously, you'd have to be sure that the URL steers clear of Wikipedia:Copyright violations. Personally, I would suggest not to use the film as a source for this sort of thing because secondary sources are always better, if available. Also, you want to avoid violating WP:SYNTH which is done when you present a conclusion that you reached yourself by citing a primary source. But, if you do decide to cite the film as a source, you can use reference #68 from this version of Children of Men as a guide of how to format a citation to the actual film. (talk • contribs) "

Intercontinental Champion]] Jeff Hardy WWE World Tag Team Champions Hardcore Holly & Cody Rhodes WWE Women's Champion Beth Phoenix

" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Cannock. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Tomayres "

PWS-22 and PWS-23 PWS-22 & PWS-23 Hi Halibutt, Excellent to see more polish aircraft articles, but there seem to be some issues with these two: The subject matter hardly warrants such detailed articles A single article to cover both would be sufficient as they were VERY closely related and differed mainly in size and engine arrangements, i.e. merge them. A variants section to explain the differences between the BN3, and T variants. Try to use your own prose instead of parrotting references. Avoid adding superfluous details, such as the various competing aircraft which should only get fleeting mentions at best. Just some suggestions, but if you look at the articles again objectively you may see my points. Good luck and carry on writing articles.

" SAS reserve I believe the unit Collins was attached to was Group B 21 SAS in Dulwich South London before I joined in the early eighties. 23 SAS is in Glasgow and very unlikely where the London based actor would be.  Chat  "

"==GA Review== :This review is transcluded from Talk:Air India Express Flight 812/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. Reviewer: ""which at around 06:30 local time on 22 May 2010,"" - You should note which time zone it is referring to when it says ""local time"", or better yet, just put the time in UTC. Some references are in the wrong places, because it looks like some statements are unsourced. This is the situation in the following statements: ""Initial reports from survivors suggested a tyre burst[6] as the aircraft attempted a go-around."" - Move reference #6 to the end of the sentence. ""800 feet (240 m),[54] well before the aircraft made a touch down."" - Move reference #54 to the end of the sentence. ""and also of the alleged hostile attitude of the airline's counsel.[80] Members of the Democratic Youth Federation of India (DYFI) along with Kasargod MP P Karunkaran staged a protest on 8 September 2010 at the airline's office in Mangalore where they submitted a memorandum to officials demanding that families of the victims receive early and equitable settlements of compensation due. They also demanded the settlement process be made more transparent by opening it to the media rather than holding sessions in camera."" - Either the reference (#80) is in the wrong place, or this statement really is unsourced. The units of measure are inconsistent as to whether it is American first or metric first (e.g. 2,000 feet (610 m) and 90 metres (300 ft); they should be American first and metric last or vice versa, but not both). Some of the references contain errors: Reference #12 is missing the date, which was May 8, 2011 (the bottom of the page says it was last updated on that day). Reference #14 is a bare url and is missing all information. BTW, why is it linked to a plane crash in 1981? Reference #16 is missing the date (27 April 2011). There is a typo in the title on reference #20, it should say ""158 die, 8 survive in Air India Express plane crash in Mangalore"", not ""159 die, 7 survive"". Reference #24 is missing the publisher (The Hindu) and the date (16 December 2006). Reference #28 is missing the date (24 May 2010). Reference #29 is missing the author (Chand, Naseeb). On reference #31, add the author either as ""CNN Wire Staff"" or ""Singh, Harmeet; Neisloss, Liz; Razek, Raja; Deaton, Jennifer"". BTW, you have the wrong title, it should be ""Air India's flight data recorder sought"". Reference #33 is missing the author (Mines, Javier). The url for reference #42 redirects to the video homepage, and not what it was intended to link to. Reference #43 is missing the date (27 May 2010). Reference #50 is missing the date (3 August 2010). Reference #51 is missing the author (Proulx, Jim) and the date (21 May 2010). The url for reference #57 has a similar problem to reference #42. Reference #58 is missing the author (Nandy, Chandan) Reference #61 is missing the date (26 April 2011). Reference #64 is missing the author (Raghuram, M.). Reference #69 is missing the author (Fernandes, Ronald). Reference #73 is missing the author (Hradecky, Simon) and the date (26 April 2011). Reference #76 is a bare url and is missing all information. Reference #77 is missing the date (23 May 2010)."

" June 2012 I've temporarily removed the ""possible"" sections you added to Eurovision Song Contest 2013 article, for 2 reasons. 1) they are unsourced - all content needs to be sourced. And 2) there is a discussion at the project talk page to remove these ""possible"" sections as they are speculative content and goes against WP:CRYSTAL. If you have any queries, please raise them as a new discussion at Talk:Eurovision Song Contest 2013 or via the project talk page. Thank you, ☀Mouse "

Flag Where does the current flag on the page come from? Flags of the World showed this flag while the historic site of the Jiangsi Soviet had a completely different flag (scroll down). Which of these flags were the actual flag(s) used?

Hey Hi, I'm Dimitri from the Dutch language Wikipedia. I'm currently looking for people of about 14 to 18 years interested in politics, economy, education, business, culture or management. In March 2007 we started up a Dutch language site where we build a whole country, called Libertas. The site is named Wikistad, which means Wikicity in English. You can take a look by clicking here. Now, we're working on an English version after starting up a Romanian too. If you're interested, just come down here, you'll like it. You can become everything you want: from Prime Minister over businessman to taxi driver. Our country is named Lovia of the Kingdom of Lovia and is open to everybody. This is the URL: http://nation.wikia.com/ I'm looking forward to see you later, Dimitri. - By the way: do you have Dutch or Flemish roots, according to your last name?

" Well, the firm had nothing to do with that. It was just routine BLP work instigated by her personally. I suppose she might be doing multiple things to improve the way she is presented online, but that hardly amounts to ""using"" anyone, which sounds like a fairly hostile way to describe an ordinary activity undertaken by all kinds of people all the time. In her case, specifically, the google results are often catastrophic, with such gems as ""slutload.com"". -( You can hardly blame her if she wants to improve the situation. "

2013 (UTC) I don't think any human can accurately and knowledgeably curate hundreds of pages a day. I've been doing this as one of my principal activities for 7 years now, and I“New Peugeot Glenmarie 3S Centre” learned I can not maintain a high standard if I do more than 20 or so of the same thing at a time, for any WP process. Some people manage 50. Except for correction of trivial errors, I don't know of anyone who does many more than that successfully. And certainly not for 7 or 8 hours at a stretch. It's not that you make many actual errors. It's that you don;t follow up what other things the contributor may have written, and that you are almost always content with the form notices. I too use them most of the time, but when I see someone who seems to need assistancewhether the assistance is to stop trying the impossible or advice about what specific kind of referencing will help the article, I don't wait for them to come to my talk page, but give it. You do help them when they come here, but most people won't do that. They just go away. What we need to do to keep WP going is to get more initial contributors to remain active. '''''' ( talk ) 23:54, 10 November

:DenTek Oral Care A tag has been placed on DenTek Oral Care, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add on the top of DenTek Oral Care and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. talk

" So many errors Where do I start? ""During the crisis and ensuing recession, U.S. consumers increased their savings as they paid down debt (""deleveraged"")"" This is absolutely not true, people didn't ""pay down"" their debt at all, the reduction in debt is totally a result of defaults. "

wish to categorize, with a reliable source

"@Shiitalker - I get it. The 2012 page is about all the doomsday bullcrap and the ""truth"" about 2012 doesn't belong on that page at all. The fact that Jenkins is hyping 12.21.2012 as the ""end date"" qualifies him to be featured on that page. He is truly a disengenous charlatan. I really do get it. Interested in starting a page about the authentic Maya forecasts as documented in the Dresden Codex? There are astronomical facts in the codex for events in 2012. This is all ""scientifically"" verifiable. The numbers do not lie. Are you deep enough into Buddhism to understand what a ""terma"" is? Some of the major dates in the codex happen to coincide with events in the life of Padmasambhava. ~*~ M ~*~ "

User:Godhatesnazis Isn't this an inappropiate username? And if I linked it wrong, I'm sorry. I'm still learning.

" Ever not quite make it to the toilet and end up going poo in your pants? It feels good on a cold day at least! If you have diarreha, you end up with. Zebra legs as the liquid feces runs down the legs.! — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) "

" I am a innocent user, but being blocked due to ""Squidward vandalism from this IP range"" by Curps. Can anyone help me, please?"

" Multiple attempts have already been made to include verifiable truth and facts. Former President Bill Clinton wrote in his introduction to Former Secretary of State Madeline Albright's book, The Mighty and the Almighty, that ""Militant Hindus Killed 38 Innocent Sikhs In Cold Blood."" You repeatedly blocked this inclusion, despite this being a well-known FACT, verified by numerous human rights organizations. "

" PS: FisherQueen, I welcome your interest in this case as I would think that someone that can appreciate the ""Friends of Gays"" essay might also appreciate the manifestations of this case and of my recent treatment here in general which rises nearly to the level of kafkaesque. "

", 10 Jan 2004 (UTC) Addendum: the whole sentence says anyway that ""[socialists consider this label] a smear tactic employed with the sole motive..."", so it's highly NPOV to add the judgement about this consideration in the ""historical context"" clause, which therefore should just be deleted. 15:50"

you had no right to do that,. You have no respect for people what so ever. You have no respect for people what so ever.

" Thanks for the info, didn't realise it was a wider problem. Yeah, building a case is the best way to go I think. As for protection, I'm not sure. Protection requires ""high rate vandalism"" - this vandalism is pretty low tempo - of all the affected pages on my watchlist they were all more often that not reverted before I saw them. "

"::Hi . Just FYI, I wanted to share the link of Telugu version of Nisha Sharma dowry case. You may not understand the script, but I have beefed up the article by including the English dialogue found in the sources and translated them in Telugu as well. I will be anyways keeping revisiting this English article for more information. I am very curios to know what the court says to the accused Nisha Sharma. Good luck and have a great day!!! - "

"This template should be substituted on the article talk page."

Yes, so is the rest of the internet. Like when Al-Qaeda makes serious posts about plots that actually follow through.

The post he left on JzG's page, is again, full of lies. If OberRanks can prove the statements he made in that post are true, I'll voluntarily accept a lifetime ban, here and now.

Patrick A. Pallotto I recently expanded the article Patrick A. Pallotto which you started. Could you please take another look at the article and expand it further?

I don't actually know but I say 3 Pikachu or lots of Pikachus. Definate number of Pika~ = Pikachu, indefinate number = Pikachus. Celestianpower hab

" Trees I'm happy with your ""deprodding"" motivation and I won't contest it. I would suggest, however, that you put this motivation on the Trees (band) talk page to alert other potential ""prodders"". "

" WP:ABUSE Sorry, but all the reports (of which I saw) have been rejected as there was no blocks at all. This is not AIV (but even then some were not accepted.) ~~123~~ → report "

" Exactly...WP:NOTNEWS (talk→  ←track) "

" Mischievously, I considered waiting an entire week so that you would look really bad, and I hoped that you would then block me a fourth time, perhaps permanently, and thus make your desysopping a virtual certainty. However, my conscience urges me to give you the opportunity to reverse your block early, for your own good. Punitively blocking editors for personal reasons is clearly against policy. Further dialogue will only be forthcoming once you behave in line with policy. —  ✉ "

So as to not talk about you behind your back... Please don't hesitate, for my benefit, to delete this after you've read it. I feel that it's only fair to tell you that I mentioned you on Talk:Michael Roach. I don't think I said anything you'd disagree with, and I'm not proposing that you need to respond there, but don't want to give the impression that I'm talking about you behind your back.

Fake felafel I remove the fake felafel insert by nsaum because it not real. The gilabrand user also agree that it not belong.

" No. He had a ""christian"" wedding in a Christian church."

I'd love a picture, but that one is copyrighted. -

My purpose was to point out the chronological sequence of events error, by pointing out that the Belknap incident preceded the Stark incident, with the latter being just as or more important in the decision concerning the use of aluminum on warships. I agree that my response could have been laconic, but needed to precise to discourage deletion. However, my first posting was deleted unceremoniously and without comment. (User:retrograde62) 15:11 PST, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Moving on POLL Question: In 50 words, more or less, what do you object to, in the article in its present protected state? Answers: It's protected, I think protected articles are contrary to wikipedian principles. 21:09, 2005 Jun 25 (UTC)

" Such intransigent behaviour is not compatible with Wikipedia's policies of consensus-building and collaborative editing; it only serves to incite edit wars. Anyway, could you please explain why you consider the referece a ""strawman"" and ""unnecessary""? We are talking about Einstein, a well-known socialist, a household name, and the epitome of intelligence. Also, after reading my previous comment (and the source), are you still contending that socialism isn't opposed to individualism? Your substitute is not adequate, either: therefore, it is asserted by some critics that socialistic is less individualistic. Firstly, the use of a weasel words is strongly discouraged at Wikipedia; please read WP:AWW for more information. Secondly, socialism is less individualistic than what? This entry is quite ambiguous. Finally, I have a reputable source to defend my edit, whereas you do not. Overall, your edit violates two Wikipedia policies: No Orginal Research and Avoid Weasel Words. "

" I also started the Adam Carr article. By the way, I can't find the ""Why I Supported the Liberation of Iraq."" It'd be a pretty revealing essay to cite in the article, so I'd like to find it. "

Hello Hi wolfkeeper, I made a new wikipedia account called holmes.sherlock, I am new. I made it about a day and I did not receive any words from my admin, what's going on, I don't know, so I find you.

English Propoganda exemplified in this article. 1) there is no 'evidence' of Nost. slandering doctors. The word is vocal, and it is libel if it is recorded. He complained they were running from the plague when their oath was to help, in leiu of any dangers that is not slander idiots. PL promotes this crap, he is English, switched his name to French to libeal them, an old WWII propoganda ploy by someone that was in that war. also the expell notice has '3' separate causes, to which was written by the Faculty who would protect these lazy and imbicle doctors to begin with. When you read any real history, you will see that Mont. doctors, Ph.ds, fled danger and only existed to accept pensions. They did not care about anything but their bank accounts. this article needs a redue, from the start and take out the racism by its main contributer because this same filth is found in his workds. Archangel Michael.

"""Of course, this isn’t the first time Leinart has proven to be clueless about the NFL. A few weeks ago, he didn’t kneel down the way a QB is expected to at the end of a victory over the Lions, and the Lions defenders gave him an earful. He apologized after the game and said that he hadn’t been in victory formation before in the NFL and thus didn’t know the proper way to kneel down (which does make sense)."""

" == Issue on images still unresolved == I appreciate your inputs in Image talk:Monkey3.jpg and I agree once in a while I might sound rude (purely unintentional, since I put facts blantly). But SlimVirgin is abusing his admin power to overrule anyone. Slim is not a ""he"". Given that she named herself after a Javanese princess, perhaps you could take the hint and note that she's a woman. Also, I don't think you were simply blunt. I think you were rude to Slim. I recognise it's a fine line but given that I've mentioned it to you, perhaps you'll take more care to stay on the right side of it? She has suggested in an email to me, that she is in talks with another editor. Now, I don't know who this other editor and i certainly don't like this secrecy. Instead of having a discussion on this, she wants to finish the matter begind closed doors. She could've atleast told me who this reputed editor was to let me have a word with him/her. Perhaps she is seeking guidance on how she should approach you and wants that to be untainted by your input. I think that would be reasonable. I have a high regard for Slim and I don't think she would have a nefarious purpose in speaking to a third party. Inso far as the images are concerned, I had stated to her a couple of images on one issue (animal rights) is ok, but she insists she needs to showcase the entire album provided by PETA and its assocites. So you have a dispute. You need to recognise that you are not necessarily right! You disagree about how many images are necessary. I feel that you have to allow that your disagreement might be fuelled by your political differences as much as how you interpret the image policy. This should could easily achieve by providing an external link to the images provided by a controversial organization. The BUAV is not a ""controversial organisation"". It is a highly respected body, whose voice is listened to in all circles of British society. A viewpoint doesn't become ""controversial"" just because you don't share it. Wikipedia is supposed to be neutral and not have extreme viewpoints - But you expect it to reflect your viewpoint. thus I requested her to limit her fair use policy in this regard to 2-3 images which can be used across similar articles. this she refuses. I don't see how it is any fairer to use one, two or ten images in this instance. While I agree that Slim could have taken more care to provide a rationale for using the images, I simply don't feel that your argument about how many she should have used has much weight. One factor in deciding fair use is how much of a thing you use, that's true, but it's only one factor, and obviously, each picture is a separate case to be considered as well as part of a whole. As far as the other images, some are on personalities she claims have ""agreed"" to use their photos here. Unless she gets a written consent and a permission how can I believe. First of all, you can believe Slim because you assume good faith. Perhaps you're not aware of that policy. Yes, you can ask Slim to provide evidence of that, but your assumption should be that she has in fact acquired that agreement. Harassing another editor to provide evidence to your satisfaction and insisting you won't believe them until they have do not show an assumption of good faith. Once I pointed out that {permission} photos would be deleted anyway, she backed off and argued that it be kept on the grounds of fair use asking me to trust her. Yes, okay. Trust her AND ask for proof. Both of us are editing in good faith, but one of us has power and a circle of friends to back her while the other (me) relies on the hope that ppl. like you will help me out in this. I'd urge you to rely on the issues rather than the personalities. Yes, Slim does have powerful friends, who will back her regardless, but you should still do your best to make it about the issue in question and not about her. If she gets away with this and sets a precedence then I'm afraid there are hordes of copyviolaters straining at the leashes to bomb Wikipedia with copyrighted information. ''I think that's a bit dramatic but I agree that she has to obey the rules, which exist for good reason, and shouldn't be given a pass just because she is friends with the arbcom. However, she is not a ""copyviolater"" trying to destroy Wikipedia. Partly, I think she simply didn't understand your problem, and that was in part a failure of your communication, and partly she has become too used to having her views echoed by her friends and doesn't handle disagreement well. So perhaps you could recognise that and be more helpful than combative? I know