text
stringlengths 1
29.3k
⌀ | label
float64 0
1
|
---|---|
Can't source every info that is here. It would take a whole page of it's own. I don't regard this as important information. When that is said it's not me who has included the info in the infopage. We have different views of what's important and not important info I guess.... | 0 |
"
It appears that you're requesting the unblock of an ip that is part of a range being used mainly for disruption. Can you ease our worries by giving us an idea of what kinds of edits you're planning to make? - (talk · contribs) " | 0 |
"
Was ""Beautiful"" really pitched to Pink?
I have a problem with the caption below Pink's photo ""Originally, the song was initially pitched to Pink""; from what I've heard on TV specials, interviews, and such, of Linda and Pink... the song was never pitched to Pink, she heard it before simply because she was working with Linda, but Linda never meant for Pink to get the song. In fact, Linda wanted to record the song herself, and changed her mind only after hearing Christina sing it in the ""Stripped"" sessions, which was, if I'm correct, moths after ""Misunderstood"" was finished.
" | 0 |
"
Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nangparbat for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. " | 0 |
Proposed merge of Shirtstorm
The emerging consensus at the Shirtstorm AfD seems to be leaning towards merging that article, probably into this one. I've put a BLP notice on that talk page and want to be sure that people here know what's brewing. 70.133.154.32 | 0 |
"== Hello! ==
Hi AggressivePanda, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Table of Contents
Department directory
Need help?
Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.
Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.
How you can help:
Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.
Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.
Additional tips...
Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your ""signature"" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
If you'd like to tell us about yourself and meet other new users, be sure to introduce yourself at our new user log.
Good luck, and have fun. Wolf
Feel free to ask me anything on my talk page- just click on the ""wolf"" part of my siggy & leave me a message." | 0 |
"
and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) " | 0 |
So not a rip-off
This is, like, the best book ever. You just need to get into it. | 0 |
May 2008 (UTC)
Wolfkeeper, the paragraph covered centrifugal force and nobody had objected to it when somebody else inserted it. It was only because I re-inserted it, after Anome deleted it in conjunction with his nonsense political centrifugal force idea, that you deleted it.
I get warnings in my tray not to accuse people of wikistalking even though it's quite permissible to go to the administrator's noticeboard and file a complaint of wikistalking.
You lot have broken the rules so many times that you can't be taken seriously.
You are a wikistalker if ever there was a wikistalker. And so is PeR. You are both top grade wikistalkers. And so are Anome and SCZenz.
Now if you don't like being exposed to the truth, then go ahead and do the honours, but I can assure you that you are a wikistalker.
It wouldn't matter what I put in the main article, whether it was sourced or not. You would routinely come along and delete it on the basis of a lie in the full knowledge that you are being supported by a crowd. You have a chip on your shoulder because you have been pushing a nonsense theory that has been exposed. 06:19, 30 | 0 |
Renowned
I didn't want to make edits to the opening paragraph willy-nilly, cause i know a lot of people are working hard to get this page back on its feet. I just think that Dawkins should be called a renowned atheist and biologist, since, for the purposes of this book, it is more central that he is an atheist as opposed to a biologist. | 0 |
Thanks for following up with me.
If the material could be sourced mostly through independent sources, then there should be little problem with it. However, you should take a look at WP:COI.
The best approach would be to discuss it on the article talk page, providing some independent sources and proposing information to add to the article. | 0 |
"
Thank you for the silky creature, written with ""the world's leading authority on this species"", - precious again! - If you have articles to be reviewed for GA or FA qualities, feel free to add them on WP:QAIPOST, also post there whatever you think would article quality in general. " | 0 |
"
Wikipedia:WikiProject National Basketball Association
I am here to inform you that this WikiProject is having a callout. If you do not respond in one week after this message, we will automatically move you to the ""Inactive list"". Thank you for your time and co-operation. 24[c] " | 0 |
"
Seeing as the source currently used to verify the capacity is in English and the one you're proposing to use is in Spanish, I think it's probably best to stick with what we've got for now per WP:NONENG. If you can find an English source which is clearly more up-to-date/reliable than the current one, then come back and we can have another look at it. Regards inspect damage⁄berate " | 0 |
"
Mormonism and history merge proposal
Storm, I saw your note on Trodel's page and wanted to touch base. I am definately against merging, primarily because placing the topic in History of the Latter Day Saint movement reduces it to a ""one time"" issue. The most recent pattern of ""faith-promoting"" history was (as a BYU trained historian, I sincerely hope) a one time event. But Mormonism and history is a much bigger topic, closer to historiography, having implications from Joseph's time to the present. I don't know if this is the right title for such an article, but we are having a restructuring discussion on the Mormonism and history page. Please drop in and give your two cents. And, besides, there is certainly little room for more material in History of the Latter Day Saint movement! Best wishes as always. " | 0 |
"
would like to nominate you to become an administrator. Please visit Wikipedia:Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact Dylan620 to accept or decline the nomination. A page for your nomination at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Cyclonebiskit . If you accept the nomination, you must state and sign your acceptance. You may also choose to make a statement and/or answer the optional questions to supplement the information your nominator has given. Once you are satisfied with the page, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.
'''''' (chat, work, ping, ) " | 0 |
|Region XIII Education Service Center in Texas | 0 |
Please don't copy-paste articles from news sources into Wikipedia. user:zanimum | 0 |
"
You don't have to be an admin to warn vandals. Anybody can do that. And if you get WP:TWINKLE vandalism can be reverted easily as well. Yintaɳ " | 0 |
"
Signpost exit poll
Dear Wikipedian, you recently voted in the ArbCom election. Your username, along with around 155 other usernames of your fellow Wikipedians, was randomly selected from the 2000+ Wikipedians who voted this year, with the help of one of the election-commissioners. If you are willing, could you please participate (at your option either on-wiki via userspace or off-wiki via email) in an exit poll, and answer some questions about how you decided amongst the ArbCom candidates?
If you decide to participate in this exit poll, the statistical results will be published in the Signpost, an online newspaper with over 1000 Wikipedians among the readership. There are about twelve questions, which have alphanumerical answers; it should take you a few minutes to complete the exit poll questionnaire, and will help improve Wikipedia by giving future candidates information about what you think is important. This is only an unofficial survey, and will have no impact on your actual vote during this election, nor in any future election.
All questions are individually optional, and this entire exit poll itself is also entirely optional, though if you choose not to participate, I would appreciate a brief reply indicating why you decided not to take part (see Question Zero). Thanks for being a Wikipedian
The questionnaire
Dear Wikipedian, please fill out these questions at your option via usertalk or via email, see Detailed Instructions at the end of the twelve questions by putting the appropriate answer in the blanks provided. If you decide not to answer a question (all questions are optional), please put the reason down: ""undecided"" / ""private information"" / ""prefer not to answer"" / ""question is not well-posed"" / ""other: please specify"". Although the Signpost cannot guarantee that complex answers can be processed for publication, it will help us improve future exit polls, if you give us comments about why you could not answer specific questions.
Q#0. Will you be responding to the questions in this exit poll? Why or why not?
Your Answer:
Your Comments:
Q#1. Arbs must have at least 0k / 2k / 4k / 8k / 16k / 32k+ edits to Wikipedia.
Your Numeric Answer:
Your Comments:
Q#2. Arbs must have at least 0 / 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7+ years editing Wikipedia.
Your Numeric Answer:
Your Comments:
Q#3. Arbs...
A: should not be an admin
B: should preferably not be an admin
C: can be but need not be an admin
D: should preferably be an admin
E: must be or have been an admin
F: must currently be an admin
Your Single-Letter Answer:
Your Comments:
Q#4. Arbs must have at least 0 / 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7+ years of experience as an admin.
Your Numeric Answer:
Your Comments:
Q#5. Completely optional, as all these questions are completely optional: which candidates did you support this year, and why?
Your List-Of-Usernames You Supported:
Your Comments:
The Quick&Easy; End. Thank you for your answers. Please sign with your Wikipedia username here, especially important if you are emailing your answers, so we can avoid double-counting and similar confusion.
Your Wikipedia Username:
General Comments:
Q#6. Completely optional, as all these questions are completely optional: which candidates did you oppose this year, and why?
Your List-Of-Usernames You Opposed:
Your Comments:
Q#7. Are there any Wikipedians you would like to see run for ArbCom, in the December 2016 election, twelve months from now? Who?
Your List-Of-Usernames As Potential Future Candidates:
Your Comments:
Q#8. Why did you vote in the 2015 ArbCom elections? In particular, how did you learn about the election, and what motivated you to participate this year?
Your Answer:
Your Comments | 0 |
You can also team up with an experienced editor through the Teahouse who can help guide you. | 0 |
"==Notability of Aodan o'connor==
A tag has been placed on Aodan o'connor, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you feel that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. " | 0 |
Conspiracy BS
I am glad to see that I'm not alone. | 0 |
Also, how do you cite information? | 0 |
May 2008
Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. | 0 |
The Rent is too DAMNED High!!!! party
A fringe candidate had the name of his party censored by the state board of elections. I put this in the article. | 0 |
"
Incidentally, I'd havce no objection to restoring the article to what it was before I deleted the section - in fact I think the regular approach is to ""edit boldly"" (which I did), and then, if there's an objection (which there is), to revert until things are argued out." | 0 |
"
Harrassment, I did not do. He posted a question or whatever and I replyed, I was never rude, I never cussed, I never said anything rude to him or about him (if you want to count ""are you 5?"" in that, OK, I admit that one).
The edit warring...I was removing posts on the KDKA-TV page that did not belong. Newscasts on WPCW, whether produced by KDKA or not, do not belong on the KDKA page. I tried telling User:Kd lvr this, he didn't continued to post. He was putting information that I couldn't confirm. Such as former KDKA anchor Jennifer Antkowiak is now ""working with Leslie Sansone's In Home Walking Program"". I looked this site up and could find no mention of Ms. Antkowiak. I did a Google search, same thing. This is inaccurate and unconfirmed (if it is true) information.
The assuming bad faith, I had backed off on when it was found that User:Kdkatpir2 and User:Kd lvr were not one in the same. I thought they were, I didn't agree with it, but I had to accept that. When User:Kdkatpir2 was blocked for sockpuppetry, then I knew than that it was as confirmed as it could be that User:Kd lvr was up to no good. Had User:Kdkatpir2 not been blocked, I would not have done anything and would have gone back to updating pages like I have done.
I make it a point not to be rude to users here (there are other users for that), I make it a point to pass problems off to an admin so I don't get in trouble and cause I don't want to deal with it. I was reverting posts on the KDKA page cause I thought it was the best thing to do at the time and prior to being blocked, I was actually updatign the KDKA page, so that the back and forth that User:Kd lvr and I were doing (which was annoying the hell outta me) would come to an end (and also make the page easier to read as well).
If I was only here to berate people day in and day out, I would have been blocked long ago. I have been blocked only once before for a 24 hour 3RR violation, which I admit I did and I took something too far. That was my fault that time, but I did nothing wrong here. I was doing what I thought was right, reverting information that was incorrect and inaccurate and attempting to stop a user (who was ultimately found to be a sockpuppet by an admin) before harm was done by his behaviour.
If I seemed like I was being rude or I was breaking a rule, then I apologize. I am sorry. I didn't mean for my actions to come off in that light. If my actions seemed wrong, I apologize. I didn't mean for them to and I had no and have no ill-will toward User:Kdkatpir2 and User:Kd lvr. If I have broken a rule, then again, I apologize, that was not my intention.
I, again, ask that my block be lifted as I did not mean for my actions to be taken in the way that they were and I was not trying to break any rules with my actions. I, again, apologize. - (VT) " | 0 |
"
irony?
Why is it ""an inescapeable irony"" that the protagonist uses violence in the movie? Aren't there droves of such movies/books around? First Blood being the perfect example in this context. Maybe I don't know something about the background of the movie itself, but the theme of the movie isn't ""Ghandi"", it's ""If backed into a corner, I'll fight""." | 0 |
"
- That's a misunderstanding by those unfamiliar with asian culture. there is a vietnamese dude I know who does the same thing. In your wife's case, ""Sin Ho"" is the formal form of her first name. either the first or the second character, can be used as a pet name by the family, so those unfamiliar with their culture take it as a ""main"" first name. The family may also use some variations of this as a petname, like ""Sin Sin"", ""Ah Sin"", ""Siu Sin"", or otherwise ""Ah Ho"" etc. there are asians who consciously decide to use it as their main name, kinda akin to someone named William tells you to call them Bill, but in most circumstances, if you don't know that person well, it's considered disrespectful. " | 0 |
See Non-academic material allowed and outdated material acceptable when modern sources lacking. Ultimately, all the arguments being made to keep the additions out are not sanctioned by wiki protocol. The only real argument you have is editor consensus, but objecting just to object is not sufficient to impede the additions. | 0 |
My intention with this post was to announce the edits while we do not know the contents yet. That should at least make clear that my intention is to be neutral (as I do not know what I will be writing in a few days). Of course if the report is inconclusive that would not give much gronds for editing. | 0 |
The sentence you quote only asserts that an equation that is part of a scientific theory yields a certain numerical result if appropriate numbers are supplied for the mass of the sun and the mass of the earth, etc. The calculated numerical value is significant because, for one thing, 200 watts of energy is the equivalent of one of the larger incandescent light bulbs used in homes. They are easy to see from a few hundred meters away, but from even someplace as close as the moon it would be a very faint signal. A gravitational wave that would cross space from the vicinity of another star, diminished by the r squared rule, and still be powerful enough to agitate our crude instruments would have to be a very major event. | 0 |
i'm sorry for vandalising Thingg | 0 |
Z, Thanks for the compliments. I hope people find it useful. Next additions are the trapeze and lyre variations. | 0 |
Defending the 1905 French Law of Separation of Religion and State
International Humanist News The 16th World Humanist Congress was held in Paris in July 2005 on the theme of Separation of Religion and State. Commemorating the centenary of the 1905 French law which established such a separation, the World Congress passed an important declaration which has been published in the International Humanist News of August 2005. The 1905 law establishes laicité, or the institutional Separation of Church and State, a defining characteristic of the French republic. Of seminal importance in the ongoing and permanent battle for the freedom of conscience, Laicité is under attack today. Roger Lepeix writes of the dangers, and of the spectacular efforts by French Freethinkers to save a valuable institutional arrangement. | 0 |
Venom lover edits
Hello. Your recent edits to the articles Superman, Joker (comics) and Venom (comics) have been reverted. Please do not damage the NPOV of articles because of your own hardon for Venom. It is considered vandalism and will not be tolerated. ; Talk to the Ace. See what I've edited. | 0 |
Montford has shown himself to be unreliable, I have no view whether or not the purported email from Pearce is real, but we go by reliable sources. The Guardian online is good at correcting articles, no reason why Pearce shouldn't use that route or his own blog to issue a retraction. Note that if we're going by blog sources, email 1719 reports that one reviewer definitely recommended rejection of S&B;, and never saw the manuscript again to assess the appropriateness of the rewrite. As stated earlier this section is overdue for a rewrite and clarification. . , talk | 0 |
Not making sense is your words, it makes sense to anyone willing to understand, that those language terms have been used and written throughout the centuries, while Azeri words are varients of Persian (which you compare to Azeri, for its legimity to stay) and Arabic written in Azeri characters which didn't exist prior to the 20th century. If you would stop taking this matter as a 'battle' and read the article, its introduction and the other languages which are there, and compare it with those of Greece (in comparaison it could be considered as the name of the country), you will see that your comparaison does not work. Since while the article on Greece was made to become just a name given to the country from various languages, the one of Jerusalem has made to become one of historic name. By now you should have understood this. Each time there is a controversy on your behavior you disappear the same day to come back days later to jump in the same controversy, the same way when you stopped contributing during the arbitration cases to escape scrutiny for this very same behavior. | 0 |
Croke Park is a GAA arena but since it falls into cat. 2, I propose that it be removed once the Ariva stadium is complete | 0 |
"
That an article is ""more than a definition"" doesn't make it an encyclopaedia article. Non-stub dictionary articles are ""more than a definition"", too. Non-stub dictionary articles contain pronunciations, etymologies (with references), synonyms, antonyms, homophones, alternative spellings, translations, derived and related terms, and (yes!) illustrative quotations where the word has been used in well-known works. My opinion is that a dictionary article, mis-placed here in the encyclopaedia, that has been deleted should stay deleted. " | 0 |
The person who stole the money in the Jewelery TV scam was an employee of a private charity not the city this should be changed | 0 |
Sadly, people like Ezzex are the norm in Norwistan. In Norwistan they brainwash children from an early age to hate Jews. | 0 |
| accept=Unblock here 89.34.25.244 | 0 |
copyleft? 02:19, Mar 10, 2004 (UTC) | 0 |
WhisperToMe, I fear you're kidding yourself. The war on Afghanistan established al-Qaeda as a serious adversary of the US and led to a great recruiting drive. Any damage that it did to al-Qaeda had been anticipated.The net effect was to make al-Qaeda stronger. Watch out for the next attacks. 02:43, 27 Feb 2004 (UTC) | 0 |
Talk Page
Would appreciate it if you would not make an additional post on the same subject making threats on my talk page, that is considered Harassment and Vandalism thank you and have a nice day. | 0 |
"What language does the phrase ""beam flattener"" come from? The English term for the object which converts an electron beam to X-Rays is ""target"".
01:01, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)" | 0 |
"
A barnstar for you!
The Brilliant Idea Barnstar Thanks for your cooperation and contributions in the page for Khamenei's letter to the Western youth! " | 0 |
All 3 comments addressed. However, if you find the reworded sentence still awkward, I'm more than happy to change it again to something completely different. Thanks for the review! — | 0 |
Nomination for Adminship
Hi, Menchi: thanks for the words of support. I still have to decide whether I want to take on the responsibility! Should I notify the editor most likely to oppose me (you know who I mean) that I have been nominated? 02:14, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC) | 0 |
"
Very nice
The Excellent Userpage Award Your new userpage looks amazing —— • (talk) " | 0 |
"Needs to be defined:
""In contrast, THOMPSON argues that Perimeter's function was to limit acts of misjudgment by political or military leaderships in the tight decision making window between SLBM or cruise missile launches, and impact""
" | 0 |
I'm a sad and lonely man. I like little boys. | 0 |
"
A quick question on Aaron López
I'm guessing that the nationality standard being used here is the same as the one I'm using on the all-time MLS club rosters: nationality by national team (including youth national teams), and in cases where there is no national team participation, nationality by birthplace. Aaron López was born in Mexico, raised in the US, played ODP, but never made an appearance for a US youth national team...and thus counts as Mexican, correct? You indeed have him listed as Mexican here, and since this is the most exhaustively-researched list on Wikipedia, I assume that you are aware of everything I mentioned and based your decision on those factors. So, anyway, I'm popping in to double-check my impression: ODP does not count for purposes of determining nationality, correct? ''' 《Defender of Open Editing》''' " | 0 |
Conflict of interest policy
Hi Ronz,
Thanks for updating me on what a conflict of interest is. I know what it means. I have read somewhere on wikipedia that if it appears that a contributor is only writing about one subject, there is likely a conflict of interest. This is a fairly broad and unfair generalization.
I happen to have noticed a hole where a wikipedia page ought to be, filled it, and now any subsequent activity related to this subject comes from pride for my work in this instance, specifically to make the best wikipedia page or pages I can. Isn't that the point? Doesn't wikipedia as whole benefit from this?
I'm sure you could better spend your time mopping up after real and blatant cases of conflict of interest or advertising or whatever you're on the hunt for, instead of monitoring the activity of a passionate editor. | 0 |
You earned it ) I don't know where I would've found all those pics for the TBII page. Keep up the great work ) | 0 |
Obviously for a print work the verification of the work is the work itself. To not understand this is pointed, willful blindness. | 0 |
Alert!
Stop advertising your product! I'm sick of all your blatant advertising! | 0 |
Oppose liberalism or classical liberalism?
Should it be put that fascism opposes liberalism or classical liberalism? By saying it opposes classical liberalism that might imply that it doesn't oppose mordern liberalism. | 0 |
"
I appreciate the offer, Valley. I don't think an RfA would pass at this time. Over 90% of my edits are automated and the community requires that an editor show more diversity in their contributions. If I ever think that I have the contributions that would garner community support, I'll definitely look you up for a nom ) '''rolls''' " | 0 |
I agree. It's all Elonka's fault. | 0 |
I don't know how to use this talk page, but please help me. You are the only Wikipedia person who seems to actually want to help me rather than attack me. The fact I have put up on Piedmont High School and Piedmont, Ca is really a fact. I live in Piedmont and am not lying. If I show proof of residence, will people let me keep it on? Will you please try to help me with it? | 0 |
References
Thank you for the kind words on my User talk page. I've responded to the references issue on WT:CRIC, and as you'll see I have considerable sympathy for your views on this subject. It would be nice to reach a solid consensus on the matter. (Talk) | 0 |
we could always have the admins start banning ip's with 84 in it, ultiamtly, wikipedia should be guest free, if they dont wanna take the time to register, they shouldnt be here, and the majority of vandalisim is guest, wouldnt you agree? | 0 |
"
Thanks QBasicJedi for your explanation. That makes sense. For those readers who did not understand QBsicJedi's detailed writing, I will simplify what I understood. ""When you look at a crescent moon, the poles are at the intersection of the two arches – one the outer boundary and the other formed by the terminator. However, the way an observer see these points “up or down” depends on where he stands on earth and which direction he looks at the moon." | 0 |
"::::""the insurgent victory is fairly heavily sourced"" - If this is true, there shouldn't be any problem providing the sources in the article instead of just talking about it on the talk page.
" | 0 |
As/when Shor's algorithm is practical, where will public-key encryption go then? If discrete log will also fall to quantum computers, what is left? | 0 |
How would it be if this page were altered so that there are only links and no transclusions. Somewhere on the page there could be a link to (for example) List of federal by-elections in Canada (details) that has the links and transclusions? | 0 |
ISIS Loves to liying,FBI And CIA Are Going to Take you down cause you an Terrorist.118.101.61.104 | 0 |
Seems like good logic to me. Who wants to read an advertisement? | 0 |
Formatting error in the infobox
I reckon there's a serious issue with the formatting in the infobox. Wiki identified it as a bracket error, but I checked all the brackets in the affected section and they seem to have been closed properly. It's most likely a problem with the template rather than the article. | 0 |
Issue
redundancy and updating and automation - looks like a brilliant London wikimania discussion... | 0 |
"
MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject Historical Hungarian counties
Wikipedia:WikiProject Historical Hungarian counties, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Historical Hungarian counties and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Historical Hungarian counties during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) " | 0 |
It is not racist
what i post, you are just a PC race denier | 0 |
This is the text about D. in 1911 Encyclopedia:
DOBRUDJA (Bulgarian Dobritch, Rumanian Dobrogea), also written DOBRUDSCHA, and DOBRUJA, a region of south-eastern Europe, bounded on the north and west by the Danube, on the east by the Black Sea, and on the south by Bulgaria. Pop. (1900) 267,808; area, 6ooo sq. m. The strategic importance of this territory was recognized by the Romans, who defended it on the south by Trajans Wall, a double rampart, drawn from Constantza, on the Black Sea, to the Danube. In later times, it was utilized by Russians and Turks, as in the wars of 1828, 1854 and 1878, when it was finally wrested from Turkey. By the treaty of Berlin, in 1878, the Russians rewarded their Rumanian allies with this land of mountains, fens and barren steppes, peopled by Turks, Bulgarians, Tatars, Jews and other aliens; while, to add to the indignation of Rumania, they annexed instead the fertile country of Bessarabia, largely inhabited by Rumans. After 1880, however, the steady decrease of aliens, and,the development of the Black Sea ports, rendered the Dobrudja a source of prosperity to Rumania. | 0 |
"
I saw your message on my user page stating ""Notice: Unnecessarily changing between British and American English on Queen (band).""
Please proceed to edit any and all parts of the Queen article in any manner you deem appropriate. I have no interest in editing this article. I stepped away from the computer I was using in the University's computer lab to visit the men's room and during this time someone apparently used my then open account at Wikipedia to make the change(s) you addressed. Again, please proceed to edit any and all parts of the article in any manner you deem appropriate. I have no interest in editing this article.
Please do not reply to this message. It seems that the article in which you are interested was the only one affected and I do not want to clutter up my talk page, or any other pages, with messages about the article in question. Please feel free to edit the page upon which this message appears by deleting this message in whole or part, as you deem appropriate.LexVacPac3 " | 0 |
Rather than get all bent out of shape on the AfD page, why not read up on our standards? | 0 |
"
Jeffrey O. Gustafson
Sorry, the ""three revert"" thing was my mistake. For the record, the issue it NOT whether the ""hat"" section should be included on the Frank Rossitano page, but whether there should be a discussion about it first or, at the very least, whether Jeffrey O. Gustafson should provide an explanation that is actually an explanation and not a sarcastic put-down. (On the talk page he wrote ""We are an encyclopedia. I've linked the word for people who seem to forget what that is,"" which surpasses any of my comments in everything but cleverness.)
The ""indiscriminate collection of information"" section of WP:NOT does not explicitly cover the issue, as Jeffrey O. Gustafson seems to believe, and I believe there is definitely room for some POV. Again, this could have been settled in a debate, but Jeffrey O. Gustafson was just too good for that. He went on repeatedly deleting the section even after I added a big honkin notice that said not to for the time being. YOU tell me what I was supposed to do. " | 0 |
40547.8069444444 | 0 |
"
Also, you are supposed to be an objective editor. Now you concede that ""facts"" presented in the article and highlighted in the lede are ""slightly questionable."" Not sure what that says about you as an editor, or the quality of wikipedia articles. 209.162.18.52 " | 0 |
Warning
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article Donkey Kong 3 has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. ~~ | 0 |
Alzira Peirce controversy
Since you've blocked me for my criticism of Rms125a@hotmail.com re the Alzira Peirce article I'd like to draw your attention to evidence of Rms125sa@hotmail.com track record of abusing editor role available at http://www.questpedia.org/en/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Rms125a@hotmail.com, http://en.wikipedia.atpedia.com/en/articles/r/e/q/Wikipedia~Requests_for_checkuser_Case_Rms125a@hotmail.com_b1fd.html. | 0 |
"
Merger proposal
Basically both articles describe the same thing/process. For me, ""devoré"" is the term that most fashion/textiles people use or know, although ""burnout"" is also used quite often for the same process. However, I would suggest burnout (textiles) is preferable to the current Burnout (clothing) title of the other page if ""burnout"" is deemed more appropriate than ""devoré"". They certainly need merging, although the question is, should Devoré or an alternative Burnout page with a more appropriate title be the new home for the information? My vote is for ""devoré"" as the term less likely to cause confusion. " | 0 |
I had that in college, but I almost never used it; my classes didn't require its use, and I never thought of using it otherwise. Here, I have access to JSTOR for the first time; I'll keep asking advice from other users if I need it, but I'll not need to ask for resource exchanges as much. For example, writing Mummy Cave was difficult because and I had to have help from with a back issue of Science, but I've already checked and gotten access to that same issue myself -) Okay, enough boasting. If you ever need JSTOR access and don't have it, send me a note and I'll try to get you the article you need. | 0 |
", 5 November 2014 (UTC)
As far as I can tell, it is a decision between putting in the infobox all the land territory claimed by the United States (100%) or only 99.75%. 99.75% being the states and DC, and the 0.25% being various islands. The ""dispute"" on the other hand is all these other arguments that are not about ""area"". 16:49" | 0 |
Good job done with Fernando Gago article! Keep it up | 0 |
Something you should see
I have raised a question about your recent edits at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Judaism#Template:Kehuna_and_Kohanim. | 0 |
So what am I suppossed to do, and what do you recommend for action against him? | 0 |
It's called a content dispute, and your repeated accusations of vandalism are the actual problem here. :==( o ) | 0 |
tidies them up etc. I love teamwork. Also, | 0 |
, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
It's a bit out of focus, but more flattering; a big improvement -) 08:47 | 0 |
"
Guy de Lusignan
Come on Adam, I was surprised by your edit. It's clearly Guy de Lusignan. Even the English statue in Damascus uses the ""de"". Only 900 v. 700 on google books admittedly, but it's more when it only includes the name as a surname. How will anyone know it's a hereditary name if you use ""of""? Even English earls keep their ""de"" untranslated. (Talk) " | 0 |
"
Just call me ""Otis"". " | 0 |
Hi again!
Thanks once again for your help. I will contact universaltalknetwork.com about it, thanks for the advice, | 0 |
, maybe make some comments if needed | 0 |
"
Requested move 27 August 2015
:Hairpin (fashion) → – The fashion accessory is the primary use, everything else is named in reference to it. The disamb page should be moved/merged back into Hairpin (disambiguation) –
This is a contested technical request (permalink). ' WP:PTOPIC specifically says
being the original topic for a term is not enough to justify it being the primary topic. ' " | 0 |
"
Why is the estimated population at 6.5 billion an event.
We need a new section called Trivial. This is not a historical event. At best it is an estimate and then it is still trivial. Unfortunately this is occurring over and over in these ""On this Date"" and making this into nonsence.
Also, the birth and death sections are growing and growing putting anyone's name there. People of Wikipedia need to use some common sense before this section becomes useless. Some days nothing significant happens." | 0 |
control
User:Anon7mous, PRODUCER, DIREKTOR and AlasdairGreen27 are by the same person: you can ask ceck user control | 0 |
Can you please block from the Cheney Mason article. Evidently, from what I gather, he removed the unfavorable fact of Mason's having allegedly extended his middle finger in an obscene manner, as photographed by an AP photographer, upon the acquittal of his client, Casey Anthony in the infamous murder trial; I just attempted to restore this, which involves the work of another user, but I'm afraid he'll remove it again. It's an infamous incident, and it needs to stay in here. Can you perhaps also lock the article, as I'm afraid it may be subject to further loss/vandalism; I'm a newbie, so I don't know how to do it. | 0 |