comment_text
stringlengths 1
5k
| toxic
class label 2
classes | severe_toxic
class label 2
classes | obscene
class label 2
classes | threat
class label 2
classes | insult
class label 2
classes | identity_hate
class label 2
classes | prediction_hate
float64 0
1
| prediction_nsfw
float64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Just to clarify, I'm against the putting up of scanned images of newspapers and magazines for the citation of claims made in the article. That said, and noting that Drnoamchomsky seems to agree with me on this point, he should note that most of his citation of various business magazines are in this form, and either provide citation in the form of links or remove any claims so cited (I hope you understood that inspite of the tortorous wording).
PS: And since you're so on board with the no-scans idea, can you please remove the scans from the Arindam Chaudhuri article too? | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000039 | 0.000159 |
****I really don't care. It's completely unverifiable and indicates zero notability. But here goes. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000167 | 0.00001 |
August 2007 (UTC)
EMS - thought you may be interested in this solution to the twin paradox - I havent seen this one before
http://home.earthlink.net/~owl232/twinparadox.pdf. - 03:14, 31 | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
Needs disambiguation
Should point to Doomsday_Book_(novel) | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
Plus, this article notes where Gygax himself mentions that Law-Chaos is based entirely on two fantasy series (ie. not real life), and the game goes on to explain about how you are playing characters in a story. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000017 | 0.000012 |
"
Andrew, Although not a wiki expert, I believe that emails/memos and letters from official sources (e.g. a local council member) discussing the issue would provide a suitable enough reference. Check out wikiepdia's manual of style for guidance on quotations. You might also consider changing the article to something along the lines of ""It was reported at the time that Taylor was disliked in his local constituency because of his colour. These reports were used to sensationalise the election and are largely unsupportable."" There are ways of saying almost what you want. All the best " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000015 | 0.000014 |
"jpg|25px|]]
==Maori==
Ocean going canoes were probably masted and covered most of thevoyage under sail. See Goldie's painting, ""The Arrival of the Maori in New Zealnd"" although not authentic it is probably a reasonable image of the canoe. Similar but smaller canoes can be seen today on many Pacific Islands.However your edit does not change the sense of the articleso I left it. Cheers
== Poor man's watchlist ==
You're right, I forgot all about the related changes trick. So I guess technically it is possible for me to have a watchlist, if I just manually list them. Thanks for that insight.
There are also benefits to not having a watchlist, though, the most salient of which is that there's no watchlist to eat up all your time. This should not be underestimated. -)
I'm a hit-and-run editor, so watchlists don't work too well for me—I don't want to get bogged down in looking at an article because I happened to edit it a month ago, say. At present, I'm using my contribution list to keep track of my most recent edits (for the incidental discussion on talk pages et al.), and that works quite well. Thanks for the idea, though.
:The ""words to use"" issue has now been completely resolved, thanks to our collaborative editing. I removed the link to it from ""words to avoid"". ;-)
==Vanavsos==
Whether the name changes or not, I have noticed your comments on the deletion page. Can I get you to vote to ""keep"", no use arguing about the name if it is going to be deleted. Thanks.
== Photos ==
Yes, they bring back memories, and could almost be photos I took back in the early eighties (film back then, of course); very nice (apart from the dead goat — I'm a vegetarian).
== User:Vaoverland - administrator ==
Thank you for supporting my appointment as an administrator. I appreciate the pat on the back this represents. It felt nice to read the comments during the voting. Please let me know if you see something I should be doing as admin, as I intend to be fairly passive unless it is clear I should do otherwise. Thanks. Mark in Richmond.
== Legal fiction ==
The reason for putting Age of consent into Category:legal fictions is because the premise in law that an individual is unable to consent to something at one age, say 14, because they do not have the ability to understand or the ""capacity"" to consent and yet are able to consent at 15 is essentially arbitrary. The reality is that there is not too much different between most 14 year-olds and 15 year-olds. However, the law ""pretends"" that there is a difference and draws a distinction for everyone regardless of an individual's actual capacity. Thus, the age of consent is a Legal fiction. If you have any more questions or concerns, please let me know. Cheers! " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000013 | 0.000107 |
kiss my asshole bitchezzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz!!!!!!!!!!!11 | 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 1.00001 | 1.00001 |
Sharon is a very stupid girl. She says the f word usually once a month. | 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 1.00001 | 0.154857 |
"
== Warning against Original research ==
Do not made edits such as this. This is blatant original research. Nothing in the quoted reference indicates ""Anti-Turk"" sentiment. This is your only warning. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000011 | 0.000077 |
Benjamin has to be a male;due to THE FREAKIN' POUCH ISN'T ON IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000805 | 0.000024 |
"
== Answering your question and giving my point of view/opinion. ==
You wrote:
""cause it comes from the medieval manuscript (who could be offensed by that?!))""
Hectorian, I believe that because that the words ""educated Persian""
in quotes implies that the writer was being sarcastic....that he/she
does not believe that the Persian was an educated person.
If the manuscript does indeed indicated that the Persian was
educated, then fine. But the quotes need to go. I believe that
that this is a necessary change to keep this article objective.
If you disagree with my opinion, think of it from this angle.
I read this and immediately deem it to be bias. I would think it
impossible to believe that I’m the only one to believe this, even
though it may in fact not be bias. However, being that some
may agree or disagree with either or us is grounds in itself to
remove the quotes in order to avoid any appearance of bias.
It’s the safe road to travel.
Sincerely and respectfully, Sideshow Todd" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000032 |
"
== ANI ==
==ANI notice==
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.—'''''' " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000225 |
== Nazi Scum ==
Nazi Scum | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 1.00001 | 0.001035 |
"
== Mariah Carey's 14th Album ==
Hi , I was wondering (well to be honest, I was being nosey on your page P) and saw that you created Mariah Carey's ""Triumphant (Get 'Em)"" page and I thought would you be interested in a joint creation of a page for her new album when we all get to hear about it? Please don't feel like I'm gonna go all ""You, me, we're doing this page, if you don't like it, well tough!"" I just thought with your knowledge of creating pages and me liking to add information on here I thought we could do the page together, please write back to me, either on here or on my page. ♥ " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000013 | 0.000676 |
"""Van Slyke was the first major league player to poop his pants on field.""
Is this true? " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000012 |
== Image:Sal_2.jpg listed for deletion ==
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Sal_2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
== VfD COOL ==
Sorry if I seem too forward in telling an admin about procedure, but it's generally considered bad form (as per VfD notice) to redirect an article while it's on VfD - confuses the issue too much. I have reverted to the stub. Just thought I'd let you knopw. Thanks. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000028 |
== Unfortunately... ==
This para isn't acceptable:
: Unfortunately, UNESCO did not check the credentials of its partner, who are engineers, but not historians. Ibn al-Haytham did not lay the foundations of the present day, but contributed with significant work to methods, theories and observations that were developed and made in Antiquity and shared by many scholars, whatever their ethnicity or religious affiliation, in Islamicate and Christian societies of the Middle Ages and the early modern period. Hence, Ibn al-Haytham certainly deserves our respect and appreciation as one of the great scholars of the 10th century and worthy to be mentioned with praise in all our modern cultures across the globe, in schoolbooks, newspapers, the TV, the Internet or other media. But we should not present him as the inventor of modern optics or today's scientific methods, which are neither one nor the same even as in the 19th century.
It may or may not be true, but without any sources its just editorial interpolation | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000015 | 0.000035 |
HOLY CRAP my name is John Power (im not joking)
and i play the bass guitar OMFG THIS IS COOL!!! | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.030507 | 0.001051 |
, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
::::::Please re-review those templates. Those reference the death of the copyright holder, not that of the subject. 02:50 | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
- well, in Sonic X I think she may have pecked him on the cheek, but don't quote me on that. On quotes, I think that there should only ever be one quote from each appearance.
Wow.. i can't believe knuckles actually let her kiss him... I wonder if they will have some batidnas? Hmmm... Echidnats or Batidnas, you decide! Dalek
What are Echidnats and Batidnas? Are those their children? Well, a kiss wouldn't make anybody pregnant. anon
I know something that would! Ha ha ha, naughty little echidna, you! Dalek | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.03815 | 0.001731 |
"
:::::::::Stick to the topic, eh guys? It's not pleasant to try to discredit other editors when you're not getting your own way. Have you considered that this needed the opinion of editors not close to the subject to give the English POV - to see it the way someone unfamiliar with Chinese writing would, and to consider WP:AT, etc., from this perspective? The article titles were completely inconsistent with policy and with each other when I got here, and incomprehensible to the casual reader.
::::::::::I like your pot and kettle style. Quality comment right there. | — email " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000025 | 0.000028 |
Hi, I'm not sure where to post on your talk page but I noticed it said you don't check this but if you do, please reply.
I use the UK Google homepage and also tried Google's link to their .com page and they are white. I did this before midnight too. Is there anyway that your page may actually be different to mine?
Also is it still dark now? | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000011 |
":::: I don't see Wattie doing anythong wrong on that pic, just the idiots behind his back. So it doesn't prove a thing (or disprove either)
::::The whole discussion above is just what made me sick of the whole anarchist movement of nowadays: self-righteous snobs condemming everything and everyone that's not 100% like themselves as ""wrong"" and ""thus fascist"", based on hear-say information and quotes out of context as ""prove"". They could even turn Dead Kennedies to fascists with that method (""California uber alles""). Now go and shout as much as u like with your anarchist uniform, but please try to keep wikipedia neutral and verifiable. PS. and if u happen to see nazi-skins at an Exploited gig, just kick the shit out of them.
" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.021975 | 0.00584 |
"
==The UEFA '""conspiracy"" against Chelsea==
We all remember the drama of the Chelsea vs Barcelona semi-final 2nd leg. The referee did not have his best day. Nonetheless, I think it is not appropriate to include this rather subjective recollection into the short paragraph about the semi-finals: ""Chelsea were knocked out by Barcelona after a highly controversial performance by referee Tom Henning Øvrebø.""
Firstly, it sounds as if wikipedia was stating that Øvrebø's performance was the actual and only reason for Chelsea not winning. And secondly, we could write a similar sentence next to practically each and every game of football. This sentence does not belong here as it hints to an intentional discrimination of Chelsea by the referee and the UEFA. We should not forget that Øvrebø's worst call during that evening was to send off Barcelona defender Abidal after a blatant Anelka dive with 25 minutes left to play. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000191 | 0.000033 |
When archiving, remember to COPY this code to the bottom of the new archive page. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
::::How can you say that Users who are looking for ""politics of China"" are not looking for the RoC? I am such a user. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000015 |
Hahaha, just kidding. I think this is pretty damn awesome.
Hehe | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000219 | 0.25468 |
including declaration of consent | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
== uh, ==
whats wrong with insulting myself? I am not, anyway. Ithe 66. guy IS odst. I just forgot to sign in. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000015 | 0.000073 |
Comments ===
As I stated in the previous RfC about Michael Lucas's biography, manufacturer PR material about a product is generally acceptable as an encyclopedic source. If editors who disagree with the company position find evidence to the contrary in other published sources that meet WP:V - such as a film review in an established magazine or newspaper - then that opinion may be cited alongside the manufacturer statement. While it may be possible that the film producers cited the public domain novel instead of the copyrighted film for legal reasons, it would violate WP:NOR to advance that view without a verifiable source for the claim and it would violate WP:NPOV to exclude the production company's position.
= | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000012 |
==Thank you==
Hello, TenOfAllTrades. Thanks for your vote at my adminship nomination. I appreciate the support. Cheers! — | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
, , ,JN MHKJGC ,,FHGERE KBGGHJG KJWT | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
Love to know more!!!!!!!!!! | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
:: Takk. Jeg snakker bare litt norsk! | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
Oh and only now I see that dready banner on top of this page — I do hope that you will feel better soon! Please take the picture above to be a suggestion for a proper health resort, rather than an attempt to make you jealous! — | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000012 |
::Obviously many Indians today don't live on reservations. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
{| width=""100%"" style=""background:transparent""
{| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#""
|style=""width: 50%; border:1px solid #; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""|
{| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""2"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#""
| Hello Joel Garay, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.
Happy editing!
|}
{| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#""
|style=""width: 50%; border:0; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""|
{| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""2"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#;""
|-
! Getting started
|-
|style=""color:#000""|
* Introduction
* The five pillars of Wikipedia
* How to edit a page
|-
! Finding your way around
|-
| style=""color:#000""|
* Table of contents
* Department directory
|-
! Editing articles
|-
| style=""color:#000""|
* How to develop an article
* Manual of Style
|-
|}
|style=""width: 50%; border:0; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""|
{| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""2"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#""
! Getting help
|-
|style=""color:#000""|
* Frequently asked questions
* Cheatsheet
* Where to ask a question
* Help pages
* New contributors' help page
|-
! | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000011 |
Furthermore, look at the biased wording Wyss uses in the said paragraph. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
:::::::I don't think he's ignorant of the law, but it sounds like you very likely are. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.789112 | 0.000023 |
:Also, the other two quotes should be removed as they are not referenced. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
== For fuck's sake... ==
Milburn, you can't move me out of the competition after the round's already started. '''''' " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000031 |
The connection with the stopped watch is that in both cases there's a solution that works only if you ask the question for which it (the watch, or the simple solution) produces the correct answer. It's like using Pythagoras' theorem to determine the length of the third side of a 6-8-X triangle without saying anything about whether the triangle is a right triangle. Yes, X is 10 if the triangle is a right triangle, but Pythagoras' theorem only applies if the triangle is a right triangle, so unless it's given that the triangle is a right triangle or you can somehow show the triangle must be a right triangle based on what's given, using Pythagoras' theorem is unjustified. Similarly, showing that the unconditional probability of winning by switching is 2/3 for the MHP (which is what the simple solutions do) when asked about the conditional probability is not a complete answer unless you also say something about why these two probabilities must be the same.
:::::::::You don't need to take my word for this - it's exactly what Morgan et al., and Gillman, and Lucas, Rosenhouse, and Schepler, and Rosenthal, and Grinstead and Snell, and the others I keep mentioning are saying. And, since Wikipedia doesn't care what you think or what I think, and there are plenty of reliable sources that present unconditional solutions without justifying their answer must be the same as the conditional probability it's perfectly fine to present these sorts of solutions. What I'm saying is NOT fine is presenting these solutions as if they are the undisputed way the problem should be approached. This isn't a difficult concept - I'm perplexed why we have to keep arguing about it. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000257 | 0.000141 |
Actually (hahah very comomnly used by non native speakers yes? ) the Indonesian airport articles have mostly turned into a heap of shit - a classic case of messes that clearly no one has taken the little anak by the hand walked them out into the open and given a big cleanup to clear the dust from the lungs ) | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.003567 | 0.019767 |
fuck you ass hole (SEK) | 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 1.00001 | 1.00001 |
== WP Hinduism AshLin 1 ==
Thank you AshLin for the kind response and support offered by you. I would like to know the procedure for signing up for participation. Kindly guide me. Regards. Thank you. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000031 | 0.000021 |
wikibreak|message=This user is taking a Wikibreak and will be back soon.Trying to cool myself for making stupid edits on Wikipedia}}
{{ | 1true
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.998639 | 0.000106 |
:The best way to end the debate is to recognize that the pictures will not be removed. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
==the sock puppet mess==
Just want to thank you for unblocking me and apologising, I think it would be cool if we could start fresh, and don't worry everyone makes mistakes, no ones perfect right, so lets just put this whole thing behind us now. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000014 |
"
:If its generally supported by the consensus, or never had consensus to be changed, then I am fine with you making the changes. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000011 |
why you are deleting choomanthar 3d page I can't understand please reply soon | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
:::Ah, the voice of reason! ) You're right, the jab at liberalism was entirely unnecessary, but alas I am only human. Neutral Point of View is violated by assigning an unimportant fact undue weight. In an article that is supposed to be about the governance of a state, the choice to include a statement in the lead regarding how many times one may have traveled outside of North America (again the distinction here is specifically chosen; for example, why the distinction between United States and North America, or even Alaska and North America?) marks an attempt either consciously or unconsciously to push a certain POV upon the reader. That POV happens to coincide with the Governor of Alaska being the current Vice Presidential nominee for the Republican party. The argument that simply because it is a reliably sourced, verifiable fact it should then have a place in the article is absurd. I am sure that there are hundreds of reliably sourced, verifiable facts about Sarah Palin which have nothing to do with her governance of the state of Alaska. Thanks again for your response, " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000029 | 0.000035 |
"
:Annoyed? I was LIVID. Happy 2013 everyone! '''''' " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
" December 2012 (UTC)
:::Since apparently you think my editing is ""continual incremental thrashing of POV bullshit in the encyclopedia"", I will not give you the benefit of ""AGF"".
:::You accusations is striking though, as I have not edited so frequently in Wikipedia as you had, nor for so long, and this is my first dispute, which is more it seems than you can say.
:::I'm curious why you think that this ""area"" is the only one that interests me? Admittedly it is an area of interest, and it was only when I was wronged in a conversation, and informed that Wikipedia does not list ""Jews"" as indigenous that I was forced to wade through the ""incremental thrashing of POV bullshit"" in the talk pages before editing. I'm sorry you feel slighted, but facts are facts. Most ""Jews"" that care anything about their cultural practices know if they are Kohen, Levi or Yisrael. 14:49, 3" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000618 | 0.000187 |
At this point I think that both sides have so entrenched themselves in their positions that getting any edits in either way is going to be impossible until the Drive-by WND idiots leave or start making constructive, sourced edits. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 0.000015 | 0.000152 |
"
:::That's not what she just wrote on the Karl Rove page. There she wrote: ""It's not a personal attack - it's describing your bad behavior, which continues. That is not a personal attack. And I am finished feeding the troll | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.009589 | 0.000128 |
"
::""I propose to revert to the latest version by Anomalocaris"" there is nothing of good faith in such an arrogant statement of intent. Play nice, treat people politely and you won't piss people off as much as you've pissed me off now. It's hardly a good way to begin a discussion. - " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.04624 | 0.001293 |
Sometimes çikolata renkli (Chocolate colored) can be heard as a sympathetic and approving definition for a black person. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000777 | 0.000013 |
"
:I replaced your edit. Sorry. I goggled ""Objective-C"", but must have mistyped as no hits. Thanks for letting me know and fixing that in the first place. Cheers " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000021 |
. Try to engage your brain before commenting and making a fool of yourself in front of others | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 1.00001 | 0.000087 |
* Oh, and one more thing. Are you too stupid to realise the reason you can't reference your sources is because you keep deleting them as 'advertising?' | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.999942 | 0.002099 |
8 July 2005 10:09 (UTC) | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
here's a fact: you're a douche | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 1.00001 | 0.000016 |
==Stylistics==
Thanks for your email. I'm glad you appreciate my input. The proposed ammendments are fine. Go ahead. I wasn't sure myself about the 'phonology' heading. The main point of these paragraphs seems to be about the stress placed on particular syllables, so 'word choices' is probably a bit too general - but can act as place-saver. By the way, you might like to have a look at the literary language article. As far as I can see, there is a confusion here between 'literary language' (of the sort you are addressing on the Stylistics article) and the conventions of written language as opposed to spoken language. I'm sure you could help them sort it out! | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000151 | 0.000081 |
:What I would like to suggest is splitting this article like List of Battles, with every sublist for certain centuries as separate article, rather than taking away one or two parts of current list. If there is no objections I will do this soon. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
== FA example ==
From what I can see here, they switched out one of your FAs for another. I smell a conspiracy. Hmm hmm hmm!!! P !!!!!!!!!!!!! ) | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000124 | 0.00436 |
Okay, thanks. I will continue my comments on Indiggo77's talk page. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
==Cost of Medical Care==
This source places the annual cost of medical care in the US at over one trillion dollars: http://aspe.hhs.gov/health/costgrowth/ It would be useful to know if there is any research comparing the average amount spent by Christian Scientists on health care, to the amount spent per capita by individuals, health companies and the state on conventional medical care. (It could then perhaps feed into the Medical Controversies section.) As someone who has relied almost completely on Christian Science health care for 35 years or so, it seems that I would spend nowhere near the amount indicated in the linked article than is spent per individual on medical care. (I would say, in my case, a few hundred dollars per year at most on practitioners' fees.) | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000011 | 0.00002 |
:::::Even if her statement were more than a stupid lie, she is a lawyer. | 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 1.00001 | 0.030892 |
"
== Your input is needed on the SOPA initiative ==
Hi Daniel J. Leivick,
You are receiving this message because you expressed an opinion about the proposed SOPA blackout without specifying a preference between a full blackout or soft blackout. Please ensure that your voice is heard by clarifying your position accordingly.
Thank you.
Message delivered as per request on ANI. — " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000037 | 0.000278 |
==Review comments==
Some suggestions for improvement as the article is expanded:
*Appropriate infobox should be added
*Photograph should be added from a source with a free license
*Body of article should be divided into appropriate subheadings
*Information on works should be expanded, and references required
*A complete bibliography would be useful
*References should be expanded (preferably from sources additional to the Prague Post), and preferably converted to inline format
*External links present which could be used to expand article | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
Per the discussion on Curse of Cain, I've moved portions to Blacks and Mormonism that does not deal directly with the Curse of Ham. Mormon's views on blacks and slavery may or may not relate to these two doctrines, and is certainly intermingled, but the references do not specifically relate to the Curse. If all Mormon views in the early church on blacks are to be removed, then let's be consistent. - | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000063 |
:The page has since been revamped as a NPOV stub, and so any copyright infringement has long since been nulified. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000011 |
Concur. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"== Your submission at Articles for creation ==
[[[edit]Decamethyl ferrocene]], which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
* Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
* If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
Thank you for helping Wikipedia!
Yoenit " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000014 | 0.000018 |
Lytton|2nd Earl of Lytton]] included in this list? According to his bio he served briefly (1925) as viceroy, and the articles on the Earl of Reading and Lord Irwin list him as successor and predecessor, respectively.
==File:Malik Ghulam Muhammad.jpg Nominated for Deletion==
{|
|-
|
| An image used in this article, File:Malik Ghulam Muhammad.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 3 November 2011
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
This notification is provided by a Bot
|} | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000013 | 0.000095 |
Oh god, you've got the chainsa-UUUUUUOOOOOOOOOOOOoooohhh | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000012 | 0.00001 |
== Block ==
This account has been blocked for repeated vandalism. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000013 |
This message is regarding the page . Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000011 | 0.000013 |
: Thank you so much for the cupcake! You're too kind, Maryana. I was just trying to keep somewhat 'fresh'.... Not sure how useful this is to do so, but I'm doing it anyway. Sorry about the delayed response. I was off-line. Happy editing. Cheers! | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000013 |
== Poland official census results 31 March 2011 - population: 38 511 824 ==
Ludność w gminach. Stan w dniu 31 marca 2011 r. - wyniki spisu ludności i mieszkań 2011 r. (click: Pobierz) | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000025 |
"
: Support. Whatever you're able to do would be great. If the photos are under copyright, Wikipedia has some process for licensing photos where permission to use them is kept on file. The details are discoverable at places like WP:OTRS and Commons:OTRS. Or if they are released with public domain or creative commons licenses then OTRS is not needed. The existing photo can be deleted right away if you are confident it is wrong. Just delete the line that says """". — " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000011 | 0.000017 |
juicy butt holes | 1true
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.022648 | 0.00001 |
"
:::::::Heh, is he serious? Or should I say, is he fucking serious? It makes me want to go post George Carlins ""7 words"" on his talkpage. I won't though, promise" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 1.00001 | 0.998297 |
"
: I have not ""formally"" protested (contested?) this particular topic ban, as I think others can do that better. What I raised was a disturbing implication, which is nothing less than — censorship. Now it should be noted that I do allow for some restrictions — ""censorship"" — in regards of pornography, copyright violations, etc. These are definite, previously identified subjects (however blurry they may be around the edges), which can be cast as particular exceptions to general ""free speech"". And it should also be noted (as I stated on the noticeboard) that I am not coming from any notion of individual rights or such; my concern is whether Wikipedia is self-limiting in respect of what can be discussed. This especially concerns me when discussion (or editors) is restricted on the claim of ""maintaining order"" — which is precisely what you have claimed (above, and previously). And just what totalitarian regimes claim.
: Your initial statement that was certain discussions could not be held on the talk pages, were ""best held elsewhere"". Which turns out to be nowhere on Wikipedia. And now you explicitly deny participation to — blocked editors? I thought we were discussing topic-banned editors, but perhaps this is immaterial, seeing that WMC was blocked for saying nothing. At any rate, what I see is an editor being banned/blocked for some very petty, arbitrary reasons. This has all the earmarks of invidious censorship, and I have yet to see what is misunderstood. - " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000017 | 0.000024 |
"
#
You have been blocked from editing for vandalizing . If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000014 |
I just farted.. oh..my..God... what...the..beeeeeep..? It smells horrible.. seriously who does that?!?! Oh my.... ugh!!! *click* (boom!)<- that is what happens when you fart in an elevator.. [[User: Smart Fellar. ermmm I mean fart smeller?) | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.902831 | 0.001341 |
== miles ==
he has a small wee wee | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000011 | 0.000011 |
"
:FYI, all the links and references for the ""Criticism"" section are blogs and forums, which under Wikipedia's policies are invalid references (Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:External links). That makes the whole section look like an original research. Unless you provide a reliable reference (like an article from the PEP; not a forum link, a news article from a newspaper or a press release from GMA or any other network) then the section should be removed. - " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000011 | 0.000138 |
:::: Adolf Hitler also had relevant information, being a personal participant in the events being discussed in Mein Kampf. His work was published by a mainstream press. Your argument leaves you no choice but to consider Adolf Hitler to be a reliable source. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.259087 | 0.004239 |
"
:You are very, very close to getting reported for edit-warring and POV-pushing (look both of those terms up before even thinking of reverting again, c'oz' you know I will report you). Note that my last two reverts strongly urged you to discuss your edits. If you can cite anywhere in the film or credits where they referred to ANYONE as Iranian, then we can consider using it. If you cannot cite that, then we are done here, - " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000012 | 0.000064 |
FUCK ALL YOU ASSHOLES. YOU PERVERTS. | 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 1.00001 | 1.00001 |
Kirsten Heiberg was automatically a German citizen when she married Franz Grothe in Oslo in May 1938. This was very important to her, as German authorities insisted on the fact that only German citizens could be members of the Filmkammer, which again was neccessary to obtain permission to act. Non-members of the Filmkammer could normally not get permission to act in German films. For her first three films, Kirsten Heiberg was given special contract, giving her a much lower salary than Filmkammer members were given. ( ) | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000011 | 0.000038 |
:::This is actually Looneyism. Most of his followers never read his political views that he lays out in his book. He yearned to go back to a time when a few privileged men held the political power, with a subservient underclass meekly obeying their betters. He claimed that this was Shakespeare's message; he had no gift for subtlety or irony. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000123 | 0.000531 |
== Footbo ==
Harro, please give comments as to what specifically is wrong with the article instead of just flagging it. You help no-one that way. Thanks | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000014 |
"STI's?? ==
Seriously: What the fuck. Is that actually what the medical establishment is calling it now? What kind of nimrods are they? How can you educate the public about the dangers of something if you keep changing its damned name? This is the dumbest thing I've ever seen. ""STD"" might be 0.001% less scientifically accurate than ""STI"" but it already has widespread recognition making it a useful piece of terminology for spreading information. The public awareness campaign can only be harmed by the confusion this sort of blinkered foolishness will produce. Someone explain to me why it should be changed on Wikipedia, and give a GOOD reason, not just ""everyone else is doing it"". -
== " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.297082 | 0.001238 |
Aquí podréis dejarme mensajes. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
== The Great Departure ==
There are some disputes regarding the great departure of Buddha. The reason described in the article is about a dead person, a sick, and an old man. This view is described but not properly referenced in the article.
Another, and more justifiable, reason is given in the book The Buddha and His Dhamma by Dr. Ambedkar. He writes in its prolouge:
The first problem relates to the main event in the life of the Buddha, namely, Parivraja. Why did the Buddha take Parivraja? The traditional answer is that he took Parivraja because he saw a dead person, a sick person and an old person. This answer is absurd on the face of it. The Buddha took Parivraja at the age of 29. If he took Parivraja as a result of these three sights, how is it he did not see these three sights earlier? These are common events occurring by hundreds, and the Buddha could not have failed to come across them earlier. It is impossible to accept the traditional explanation that this was the first time he saw them. The explanation is not plausible and does not appeal to reason. But if this is not the answer to the question, what is the real answer?
He gives the real answer in the first part of the book, From Birth to Parivajra. This should be taken in account and must be included in the article. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000086 | 0.000017 |
:::::::::::::: I do not own this article, and if you think that my objection to any change is unjustified you should use dispute resolution. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |