monology/jigsaw_test_pred · Datasets at Hugging Face

comment_text stringlengths 1 5k	toxic class label 2 classes	severe_toxic class label 2 classes	obscene class label 2 classes	threat class label 2 classes	insult class label 2 classes	identity_hate class label 2 classes	prediction_hate float64 0 1	prediction_nsfw float64 0 1
" ::Hrm, cheers. I typically advise my adoptees against simulating Mediawiki interfaces, or if they must, not making the message exactly the same as it would be in a ""real"" new messages situation. – "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
. References used in the article from The Economic Times, NDTV, The Times of India and Business Standard are reputed newspaper and news agency In and around the world.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
Chungho is actually spelled Jhonghe See: and	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
" == The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy == In your last revert, you wrote, ""rv: the point is, HHG redirects here, so someone typing that while looking for High Harmonic Generation might end up here instead"". I agree with what you wrote but, unfortunately, that is not what the text says. It actually says: This article is about the franchise. Several terms redirect here; see The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy (disambiguation), Hitchhiker's Guide (disambiguation) and High Harmonic Generation. And High Harmonic Generation does not redirect here. In fact, none of the three pages listed redirects here. So what the text says is wrong, and so misleading. You did not like my solution to this problem; do you have a solution? (Please respond here or on the article's Talk page.) "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000013	0.00003
we beat them in every thing love the west for students	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000011
If this is included, it should just be a sentence. Presently it is an accusation and it is under investigation. Someone earlier reminded everyone that Wikipedia is not a news source. The biography of a living person is not a place for every detail of an accusation such as this. For now, one sentence should suffice. If readers want detail, they can do their own Google search. I think we would all do well to imagine if an accusation about us was being publicly debated by anonymous strangers.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000274	0.000475
==haha== what vandalism, idiot? ''''	1true	0false	1true	0false	1true	0false	0.00001	0.00001
:Heh. I wasn't aware that providing a link to a discussion was considered 'favourable comments'. Shame on you, nae'blis!(jk)	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.001104	0.000024
== AfD == Why? It's very sourced and I took lots of pictures (	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000011
" ==Snug Harbor== Hi. I moved the article formerly at ""Snug Harbor"" to ""Snug Harbor, New Orleans"" and made ""Snug Harbor"" into a disambiguation. Note, never try to ""move"" a page by copy and paste; that loses page history and creates other problems; use the page move feature Help:Moving a page. I'm in the process of cleaning things up. I believe the easiest way to take care of things is if you would please copy your text from this edit and paste it at Snug Harbor, Staten Island. (Note: If you think the title should be something different than ""Snug Harbor, Staten Island"", please let me know or use the page move feature as I mentioned. Thanks! Cheers, "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000011
:::His editing patterns have been erratic over the last year (or more?). Prior to January (roughly 400 edits ago), made a few edits in September, then it reaches back to March. The edits you were looking at are a bit more myopic than what I was looking at.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000015	0.000634
==Third party in the Atari/Sears list== Air Raid belongs in the third party list	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000011
" ::::I ask again, please quote where Reich mentions Aryan migration. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
::Precisely, I think bicontinental is the perfect term in such a case. Even Turkey is a bicontinental country; so Turks should have no problems in saying that Cyprus is culturally a part of Europe. We have to mention in which continent Cyprus actually lies in.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.001074	0.000018
" ::::I don't actually see a difference in the spacing in the footers at those links from May 17 and May 18, 2005. Both say ""Copyright © 1999 - 2005 Go Daddy Software, Inc"", and at the top of the page, both show the logo with a space and include the string ""The Go Daddy Girl"", and within the page they both say ""GoDaddy salutes our soldiers"". But I'm not objecting to moving the page. — "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000014	0.000017
== Nice == Haha. That is some nice work 71.5.70.130. You gotta appreciate some quality vandalism. My vandalism days are over, but I can still appreciate the work of others. Keep it up.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000026
:I'm actually neutral about this, just heard it over the radio and transfer the information here. I'm surprise that a factual statement could draw such responses. But really ... I've no interest except to clarify the fact.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000014	0.000018
== American Idiot Sales? == The sales of American Idiot on this page are 22 million worldwide which outsells Dookie on 20 million. However, Dookie is claimed on its own Wikipedia page to be Green Day's biggest commercial success and American Idiot's own Wikipedia page says it has sold less than fifteen million. Can someone please clear this up? Thank you	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000435	0.000173
"be blocked from editing Wikipedia. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
:I did some minor editing to what you added. I was kinda gearing towards what Back to December has but you changed it on me (again) lol! -	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000011
" I am afraid that I just do not see the bias. Can you give a specific example? I do not think that the article is arguing ""for"" or ""against"" anything at all. It is merely providing an account of current research in this area. I do not think any Wikipedia article is a place to provide arguments ""for"" or ""against"" such things. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000012	0.000018
"I don't see how this movie is ""science fiction"". There are no futuristic or unrealized technologies used. It's all current science. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000026
:Confirmed - thanks for fixing it!	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
LETS CLEAR SOMETHING UP I have done extensive research on the double homicide (1981) you mentioned and the earlier murder committed by the same person in 1969 in New Plymouth. 99% of the recollections of the details are always wrong and the case has wrongly become a legend rather than a horrendous double homicide. I have studied the court notes, scene examinations, pathologists reports, witness statements and even the statements by the accused and believe me, its not easy to digest. A couple of things I can clear up though: the “house across the road from the pub” is not the location. The legend/rumour about “excised genitalia” is just that – legend. These murders were, however, horrific and not really something that needs to be described on the internet.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000041	0.000232
I... err... what?	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
I am not a sock puppet == Hello my good friend. Can you please un-block me? I was only trying to stick up for my friend. I don't think I break any wikipedia rules in doing so. So can you please un-block me? I have had to use a IP adress as I'm Not a sock pupperter Thank You ==	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000636	0.000044
== Template:Deletebecause == I'm letting you know I reverted your changes to this template. # If no reason is provided {{d}} {{del}} or {{delete}} are better options. # It's blatantly obvious if someone didn't provide a reason ({{1}} would show instead of the reason) and it makes the template longer unneccesarily. P.S. I just remembered that I also reverted your style changes. Feel free to put those back... Mgm	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000045
*Brownie USA Derogatory name to refer to brown mexican people	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000019	0.00001
Malleus Fatuorum: You're quite the condescending asshole. Who changes your diaper for you? Seems it's due.	1true	0false	1true	0false	1true	0false	0.999727	0.953852
" ::As well, most countries in Asia have horrible relations with their neighbours ''' (') "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000077	0.000013
clean-up Sorry guys, I had to cut a bunch of stuff out. It really isn't relevant in an encyclopedia whether or not a building has a Kids Club or 184 two bedroom apartments. Also, since this is the Internet and all, links to other pages are nice.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.051958	0.000037
:I'm going to disagree with you. He was not officially placed on the 40-man roster, and did not play a game for the Jays in 2013 or 2014. The usual criteria for listing a team in the right hand sidebar is that he played for the team.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000011	0.000016
== Ibert == If Ibert belongs here at all (and I think of him as a no-hit wonder), I'd vote for Divertissement, not Escales. At least the waltz was turned into some intro music for some radio show many years ago on the BBC. Any arguments?	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000012	0.000039
: I've removed the box and replaced it with . I still have suspicions, though. Your unblock request will be reviewed by someone uninvolved. Sincerely,	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000011
REDIRECT Talk:The English High School	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
== Move request == Bulgarian–Greco relations → – Naming convention is country names in alphabetical order and endash between copuntry names. I mistakenly moved the page to the current title (copy/paste error), and there is an edited redirect in the way for this move.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000329
chris is a good a ctor on zoey	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
:This is not how to gain consensus. You have been reverted by 3 different editors and have simply editwarred to enforce your POV.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
Please do not vandalize articles. This sort of offense can include inserting nonsense into articles, blanking articles, or otherwise changing articles with obviously unwanted content. This serves no other purpose than creating more work for Wikipedia's editors and administrators. If you do continue, your account and/or IP will be blocked. July 2, 2005 03:24 (UTC)	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000019	0.000026
the earth is clearly flat and not round	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
Except for the formula for ICER, this article is about cost-effectiveness analysis in general, and does not explain the uses or rationale of ICER in particular whatsoever. I'd fix it if I could, but I came looking for the answer myself. ( )	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
It is ridiculous but congrats all the same ! The Pathan thing is outrageous. They probably won't even read what they copy-paste. As for plagiarism, this piece was copied from a vandalised version of the World Cup article by an idiot journalist who put it in Financial Express (the real BCCI President was NKP Salve).	1true	0false	1true	0false	1true	0false	0.567003	0.001534
masturbation, can we conclude	1true	0false	1true	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
::::::::To remind only:This is not a reduplication of that article.(b) Your tagging and assertions of WP:OR and WP:SYNTH show you do not understand those policies, since the description of the content of the page in the lead, in response to your charges, is sourced to books and articles describing the POV that considers such things as certain kinds of house demolition, and property damage, as a form of violence. That is not 'original research', not a synthesis: it is referencing.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000012
ONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITV	1true	1true	1true	0false	1true	1true	1.00001	0.999993
::You science people are revolting. Can't you just stick with that tufty rat with white underparts? In other news, my oldest daughter announced she wants to be a scientist. I tried to steer her toward animals, but she likes volcanoes much more. I want her to be an archeologist, so I can visit her in Greece when she's digging up stuff. Then again, I also want her to be a lesbian, but her latest marriage is to some guy called Jason. I think. It could be Cayden. Or Kayson.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.010595	0.00175
:Jia Dao, Li HouzhuSu, Su Shi, Tao Yuanming	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000012	0.00001
" It's not ""merely"" a single incident. A single incident can be significant enough to deserve one or more sections and sub-sections devoted to the topic. It's a professor using hate language and the consequences he faces for his actions. For the record, My Very Best wrote, ""I certainly agree with your last edit in this article and think all current refs are valid, such as that one included by you. Same with other refs, such as this,this, (same source) here and this, they also should be used. Main point here: these sources are reliable enough to source his own words, for example in his interview included by you."" and ""I must agree with MarshallBagramyan. Based on the discussion and sources so far, this article appear to be a case of self-promotion [1] by a marginally notable individual who is mostly known (based on sources quoted so far) for a genocide denial and ethnically motivated slander. There are multiple sources which are reliable enough to quote his own words on campus."" The issue of notability in this regard, that is, before My Very Best knew about his scholarly works, is irrelevant. His position on that section is clear enough and your allusion that this probably falls under WP:UNDUE and should be diluted is fallacious, to say the least. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000023	0.000375
(fuck you Osama bin laden and your afghanistani terrorist cunts)	1true	0false	1true	0false	1true	1true	0.998548	0.00714
== The Anderson House == This one is tricky because both sides have valid points. I need to hunt down references to support it but I undestand the Southern argument that the house was in such a commanding position that it really was not suitable as a hospital, and putting a hospital flag on it to prevent if from being used that way was unacceptable. On the other hand the lack of attention to defending it suggests that Mulligan's intentions were that it would be sufficiently in the rear that it would be a good site. My personal interpretation is that he or someone before him miscalculated and assumed that there would not be any force chosing to place itself between there and the river. At any rate, I see both sides as having merit. Similarly, when it was taken the Federals who retook it had been instructed to consider those holding it in violation of the Laws of War. The MSG inside didn't just up and surrender, they were overwhelmed and compelled to surrender after inflicting considerable casualties. Again, both points of view have some validity. Interestingly, those who executed the men in the hospital don't seem to have been singled out and executed by the MSG following the battle. (That is the sort of outcome I would have expected if the MSG commanders felt strongly in the right on this.)	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000025	0.000089
" The use of the term ""unethical"" is highly prejudicial. See also WP:BLP. I have listed this at WP:BLPN. '''' "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
". :Good editor Isheden can warn you that I am a fundamentalist about insisting on convex ""minimization"" unless stationary-points/saddlepoints or convex maximization be also considered"	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000747	0.000076
\| decline=I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or the block is no longer necessary because you #understand what you have been blocked for, #will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and *#will make useful contributions instead. Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. }}	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000032	0.000126
" :If a single person set it up to reflect his own interests and ideas, then yes, it is of a personal nature. Only if it were the product of a scholastic institution, with multiple, peer reviewed contributors and academically rigorous testing, could it be considered impartial. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000025
" :I am afraid I blanked Forensic podiatry for investigation at WP:CP, because while you did attempt to fix the problem which is great, the article is still a close paraphrase of the original source. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me on my . '''''' "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000011
Selena Gomez the truth You all have heard about her from her shows and stuff but what you don't know is THE TRUTH!!! Selena looks absolutely FABULOUS..............too bad shes A GUY. yes people a sports loving chick hunting guy! she only looks like a girl is because she was a guy before plastic surgery..........and thats not all!!!! shes really BISEXUAL!!!! SELENA GOMEZ LIKES BOTH SEXES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!SHE SUCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! by:roxi96	1true	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000973	0.0001
" :No good reason was given, unless this means something: ""You guys are an absolute disgrace to WP and to mankind! I'll leave you now to destroy the page in any way you want."" "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.927686	0.006937
== You deleted the Belmont Blog???? == Are you for real? You are like a 2nd grader erasing a College Professor's PhD thesis..... What balls you have.... I don't even know where to begin at the chutzpah you have.... Belmont Club had 100,000 posts of some of the best geo-political and social observations around, BAR NONE... From world history, current events, politics, science and more the community of posts are well thought out, reasoned and spirited... You sir are a disgrace!	1true	0false	0false	0false	1true	0false	0.018983	0.001071
== wow... ur an idiot == don't do something stupid mate shut the hell up if u don't like what people say	1true	0false	1true	0false	1true	0false	1.00001	0.99341
NOBODY CARES that you can try and fake, or manufacture, a mathematical equation to concur with your BS.shyjayb	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000058	0.000011
== 'Future' Section needs to add Momoa's name to those reprising their roles.. == Jason Momoa will most likely (see: is expected) to reprise his role as Aquaman in the Justice League film as well. That should be added to the page.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000029
== Replicated == Statistics where copied from 'Feminism' and are now marked as neutrality disputed in that article. I'm not sure if it is a good idea to copy it rather than using the existing link since the any changes will have to be manually added like this.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
" == GA Review #2 == {{#if:???\|{{#ifeq:\|Talk\|\|}}}} :GA review (see here for criteria) #It is reasonably well written. #:a (prose): b (MoS): #:: #It is factually accurate and verifiable. #:a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): #:: #It is broad in its coverage. #:a (major aspects): b (focused): #:: #It follows the neutral point of view policy. #:Fair representation without bias: #:: #It is stable. #:No edit wars etc.: #:: #It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. #:a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions): #:: #Overall: #:Pass/Fail: #:: Just a few little things. Interesting article! — () "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000171	0.000528
== External Links == Regarding your edits to Brookville, Pennsylvania: please recall that external links should not normally be used in the body of an article. In other words, it is inappropriate to use external links in the way one would use internal wikilinks. Thank you. —	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000506
::::::::That's a talk page discussion, not a policy you can quote.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
::::You are welcome to propose those articles for deletion if you believe they do not meet our criteria.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
" You do understand you are risking a block if you re-add an unsourced ""child sexual abuse"" again, right? "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.013006	0.000017
A Written Oirat Translation of the Yanggu Meyen(The HundredChapters) http://ir.library.tohoku.ac.jp/re/bitstream/10097/44075/1/AA1115837409010.pdf http://www.cneas.tohoku.ac.jp/asia013.html http://www.cneas.tohoku.ac.jp/img/pu01/asia013/07.pdf http://www.rinrokaku.com/wp-content/uploads/manmoku/m130_foreign.pdf https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/gengo1939/1954/25/1954_25_1/_pdf	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000025	0.000013
"::::Yet there are equally reliable sources that say the Christ Myth theory is something more than simply Jesus never existed as evidenced by Grant and Walsh as just two examples. As for what I mean by ""'Jesus existed but the Gospel Jesus is a myth-fiction' Idea"" that is simply my rephrasing of the category Remsburg and Boyd-Eddy gave us nearly 100 years apart: ::::Remsburg (1909): ""Many radical Freethinkers believe that Christ is a myth, of which Jesus of Nazareth is the basis, but that these narratives are so legendary and contradictory as to be almost if not wholly, unworthy of credit."" ::::Boyd-Eddy (2007): We have enough to show there was a Jesus but ""the reports we have of him are so unreliable and saturated with legend and ""myth"" that we can ascertain very little historical information about him."" ::::Again what separates ""the reports we have of him are so unreliable and saturated with legend and ""myth"" that we can ascertain very little historical information about him"" and ""narratives are so legendary and contradictory as to be almost if not wholly, unworthy of credit"" from there is nothing to show the Gospel Jesus (the version we base all our searches on) ever existed? That is the elephant in the room regarding the whole Christ myth theory and the most poorly explained aspect. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000046	0.000038
:: I got the explanation of the removal on my page, My mistake, regards	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000022	0.00001
" ==Comparison of representation of various states== The apportionment chart currently compares Israel, North Korea, the United States, India, and China. Does anyone have any other suggestions for comparions? I compared Israel and North Korea to show how North Korea's population advantage is neutralized by its ""Not free"" status under the Provisional People's Assembly method and by its relatively weak GDP under the Schwartzberg Weighted Voting method. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000014
" as well the biologist Jerry Coyne's review of one of D. S. Wilson's books, wherein he takes him to task re group selection: :::::""Group selection isn’t widely accepted by evolutionists for several reasons. First, it’s not an efficient way to select for traits, like altruistic behavior, that are supposed to be detrimental to the individual but good for the group. Groups divide to form other groups much less often than organisms reproduce to form other organisms, so group selection for altruism would be unlikely to override the tendency of each group to quickly lose its altruists through natural selection favoring cheaters. Further, we simply have little evidence that selection on groups has promoted the evolution of any trait. Finally, other, more plausible evolutionary forces, like direct selection on individuals for reciprocal support, could have made us prosocial. :::::These reasons explain why only a few biologists, like Wilson and E. O. Wilson (no relation), advocate group selection as the evolutionary source of cooperation."" ::::"	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000032	0.000352
To explain my point, how would you react if I started contributing to the Christian pages with the material that shows that all Christian priests are either peadophile or homosexuals, and all the Christian nuns offer sexual favours to the high-ranking Christian clergy, and all the Chritian monks are drunkards and homosexuals? The point is, an extremely small minority of Devadasis actually offered sex to the temple visitors, so there is no point in smearing all Devadasis. If I start portraying Islam as a religion of terrorists, I am sure everyone would object as I object to Devadasis being called prostitutes. Dear Sango,	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000154	0.00156
I've only ever heard this described as Factory Meat	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
Testing talk page	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
::::::::::What you disagree he's an idiot, or that it is wrong to call him that?	1true	0false	1true	0false	1true	0false	1.00001	0.000136
==WikiProject Houston== Attacked!! see WikiProject Houston for report and mission details.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
" ==Copyright Violation Allegations== Hi, I am responding to your claims you made recently on my talk page. You may not be aware that I am the chairman of a rather large rail user group, and either: 1) Have explicit copyright rights from various organisations 2) Have contributed many images to various websites 3) Any images that are from copyrighted sources can be edited, (even if slight), to waive copyright protection The majority of my images are self-taken photographs, and if you visit the image gallery at my website, www.mcrc.co.nr, you may find some of these images - that does not neseccarily mean that I have to provide evidence that they are my own work. Im sure you will agree that the majority of my images are of rail stations which are fairly hard to visit. Am I right in assuming that Wikipedia is enforced in association with US Copyright Law and definitions? S. Thomson :''The images I deleted were clearly taken from copyright sites such as the BBC, and at the same low resolution used on these sites. If you originally took these photographs and own the copyright on them, may I suggest you upload the original high-res images instead. Further information can be found at Wikipedia:Copyrights. — / "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000065	0.000061
::I think you make some really good points. I do think when someone designs a building it can be years before it's built or breaks ground. Let me check if there are any other sources to verify.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
== Scoreboard == According to EBU's own page on ESC 2001, both Bosnia & Hercegovina and Russia gave their 12 points to France, but on the scoreboard on this page, their 12 points go to Estonia.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000014
" :::::::::Quit the crap. You have degenerated and mis-represented what was a useful conversation. Signing off. North8000 "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.999957	0.000058
Good catch of Bloodgood's white lie; sounds like he was a clever and slipperly fellow.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000015
::This editor seems to be spinning out of control again perhaps you could have a look at this and offer some assistance.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
"DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE. This archive page covers approximately the dates between April 2005 and July 2005. Post replies to the main talk page, copying the section you are replying to if necessary. Archived discussions: * Talk:Voluntary Student Unionism/Archive 1/Archive 1, Talk:Voluntary Student Unionism/Archive 1/Archive 2 Hrmm, 3 paragraphs for VSU, 7 against. This seems a little biased. I'll try and beef up the pro side if I know the zealots won't delete it. how many universities would be effected by Federal enactment of VSU? All of the publicly owned ones (ie. not Bond or ACU;): to my knowledge, there's not a single public uni in Australia where student organisation membership is currently optional. ==Motivations of the ALSF== The article states (or should state): Liberal Students argue strongly for VSU on the basis of freedom of association and other grounds; They deny the charge that they are arguing for VSU on the basis of political disadvantage for their opponents; VSU advocates on the other hand consistently and routinely accuse Liberals of supporting the change for political motivations. I will undo any changes to the article that do not substantially agree with this situation, as it is simply a matter of objective fact, favouring no particular side. ===== I don't know why you are bringing so much politics into this. ""Liberal Students argue strongly for VSU on the basis of freedom of association and other grounds"" Thats a very big blanket statement. So you are saying Liberal Students, as a whole, fit your reasoning? You can't possibly know that unless you have questioned every one. Thats what I'm objecting to. FYI I'm not a liberal, and wish Latham had won. I do support freedom of choice. By the way, I apoligize for the 'commie' remark. :That's perfectly alright. Politics plays a very large part in this: it is a point of conflict over the government's legislation after all, and was debated by both sides in the House of Representatives and the Senate when it came up, with the Liberals arguing in favour of VSU and Labor arguing in favour of USU. At the last election, the ALP's policy supported USU and the Coalition supported VSU. ::Yes, but you are missing my point. I objected to the blanket language that implied that _all_ students who identified as X thought Y. :And the ""freedom of choice"" argument really only appears because some students argue that they should be free to choose not to support the politics of their student organisation. ::Hang on, I don't follow you here. Personally I think that Student Unions should stay out of politics not directly relating to education. Even if the unions didn't play politican, I still would support VSU. If some students want bands, clubs, so-called subsidised food etc, they should pay for it themselves. The ""Freedom of Choice"" argument still applies even if you ignore the political side of things. By contrast, if a Liberal group gained control of a USU supporter's student organisation, that USU supporter would still not argue in favour of VSU because they still support USU philosophically (as indeed has happened at a few campuses). So the ""freedom of choice"" argument is underlined by differences in political opinion. If there was no objection to the political content, the advocates wouldn't be arguing the need to make the choice. :: I disagree. See above. :The point is, I'm not taking a stand one way or the other over whether Liberals are* supporting it for political motivations, I'm saying that USU supporters say that Liberals are supporting it for political motivations (Many sources for this: virtually every NUS press release argues this point). If, as you say, you're not a Liberal, this clearly doesn't apply to you. The article mentions that VSU supporters deny this claim. NPOV policy simply requires that we detail the substance of both sides' arguments without putting a judgement on their validity. (. . .) :Hi, Anon. In future, please use headings and sign your posts, otherwise this talk page just gets messy. Well it appears that any time I try a	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000804	0.000365
:I did not delete any article. I reverted your edits to Frank Walker as they overwrote an existing page.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000022
" 2015 (UTC) :::More power to you for finishing the page. That doesn't mean all the assorted trivia having nothing whatever to do with Fisher isn't still junk. That Fisher became notorious because of somebody else does not mean Häyhänen's troubles or stupid behavior belongs on this page. Since they're his actions, they belong, if anywhere, on his own page. More to the point, I see no valid rationale whatever for including the codenames of people who have their own pages & comments about Cohen who has her own page. I don't see you explaining, & since you want it in, it's incumbent on you. 05:52, 26 November"	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.003332	0.000978
:They play in state cups, such as Copa Paulista de Futebol or Copa Santa Catarina. Most states have state cups.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000203
" == Is the ""Kifu"" recording system used to record Shogi games? == Kifu is the system for recording games of Go. Since pieces never move in Go once placed on the board, Kifu records a game by drawing a diagram of the board in the end position and numbering each piece to show on which move it was placed. The Kifu topic page was included in category Shogi, and said that it was also used for Shogi, but I see nothing on this page about it and I don't see how it would be applicable to a game where the pieces move about. I've removed all references to Shogi on the Kifu page, but on the off-chance that it is in some way connected I'm leaving this request for more info here. Maybe Kifu is Japanese for ""game record"" or something and is a general term used by Shogi players? If it is relevant please update the Kifu page and its talk page accordingly, and the Shogi page as well; if it isn't please confirm here? Thanks. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000011	0.000082
== Contested deletion == OnTel Rocket MePhone DigitalPhone RtcDialer Ring2Home Call2Desh KingTel KingBird BdMoittry JedMoittry MusMoittry SdaCall2Desh SaudiNet FatafatiXpress 1Pinless DmmMoittry AdbRing2Home Mb3Moittry DxbMoittry FerareDialer Sim2Sim MadeenaPlus Talk2Phone Xtravoip Mobile2Talk BetterPhone Bd24 Goldren plus Mvoice BdKing আপনার প্রিয়জনের সাথে কথা বলুন.আর এই সেবাটুকুই আমরা আপনাদেরকে দেয়ার নিশ্চিয়তা দিতেছি।সৌদি আরব, ওমান, কাতার, মিশর, ইরাক, সংযুক্ত আরব আমিরাত, লিবিয়া বিশ্বের যেকোনো দেশে কল করা যায় 100 Usd Doller 6900 Taka সু-খবর- সু-খবর!!! একই রিসেলারে সব সুবিধা !!!!সু-খবর- সু-খবর !!! আনলিমিটেড রিচার্জ সিস্টেম এন্ড মোবাইল ব্যাঙ্কিং সুবিধা !! ফ্লেক্সিলোড (বাংলাদেশ,ইন্ডিয়া,পাকিস্তান,নেপাল,শ্রীলংকা.) অটো রিচার্জ সিস্টেম- আমাদের সার্ভিস গুলো হচ্ছে: ১.ফ্লেক্সিলোড 2.বিকাশ ৩.মোবাইল ব্যাঙ্কিং ৪.ইন্টারন্যাশনাল রিচার্জ ৫.বিল পে ৬.বাংলাদেশ ব্যাঙ্ক ট্রান্সফার ৭.এস. এম এস সুবিধা আমরা মনে করি, আমাদের সার্ভিস অবশ্যই আপনাদের ভাল লাগবে*** আমাদের পেমেন্ট করার পদ্দতি গুলো • বাংলাদেশ (Brac bank,Islami bank) • দুবাই (NBD bank, Mashreq Bank,Islamic bank) • সৌদিআরব (Alrajhi Bank,NCB Bank) • ওমান (Muscat Bank) আপনার যেকোনো প্রয়োজনে যোগাযোগ করুন - CONTACT INFO: SUPPORT: MOBILE NUMBER +8801558-11419 WHATSAPP NUMBER: +8801558-11419 VIBER NUMBER +8801558-11419 IMO NUMBER: +8801558-11419 Reseller: Level-4 Level-3, Level-2, Level-1 Available'	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.124744	0.062909
" = = = This is one man's reaction to the ""April 12, 2015 Rewrite"", This is meant for ""Toothpickst"", and other readers (but mostly meant for those readers in the accident-investigation community): ==> This ""rewrite"" of 12Apr2015 ONLY SHOWS ""the Boeing Scenario"", a false-narrative that was refuted by Yorke in November 1984. QUESTION for the ""rewriter"": ?Why not explicitly state, in the opening-heading, the fact that your ""rewrite"" merely recites that false-narrative listed as P.C. in AAR81-8? Meanwhile, that mythap-Captain (H.G. Gibson) recently died with NO RETRACTION of the erroneous ""probable cause"" cited in NTSB's AAR81-8. For students and investigators: Wikipedia so far suffers, it fails to reflect a better explanation of the failure interactions related to ""discrepant Rudder"". For those readers better capable of such technical details, instead of this ""Wiki"", consider the lessons from George Schairer's paper on the B307 upset-breakup (18Mar39), consider the CAB's investigation of AA Flt One (1Mar62), upset-recovery of Mac59402 (11Nov76). As of this current-wiki ""rewrite"" of April2015, this Wiki contributes that old deception rumors from the INITIAL upset of TWA841/4Apr79. [Any technical-corrections to this wiki were removed by the those experts contributing to this Wiki.]"	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000018	0.000046
" == WikiProject Queensland/To-do == I noticed you created the page Wikipedia:WikiProject Queensland/To-do last October but it is not being used. However on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Queensland page there is a ""Things you can do"" section with tasks listed. I was wanting to add the WP Qld tasks to my page but there is no point until the to-do list problem is resolved. Is something wrong with the setup or are articles being listed incorrectly or what? Please advise, thanks. - "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000018
== another rat! == Congrats again!	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
. just two seconds ago, bird scientists just fucking called me and said that the bird is absolutely is not the word	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	1.00001	0.99977
" ::::Maybe the second, because MN.com is used also with the direct link in GAs songs. Also the sheet book can be used as reference. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000011
" :Just so you know I did revert myself, sorry again. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000011
" : That seems reasonable. Do you know whether that book had a lasting influence or was it just a topic of conversation that died out? How was it received in mainstream academic circles? "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000157	0.000061
== All admins must DIE! == prepare for your death, Banno!	1true	0false	0false	1true	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000019
:Doh...okay, I was having a gray moment...totally forgot Kyo P	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
" ===A friendly notice=== You may want to peruse our policy on misusing multiple identities before you comment further in the Mail forwarding discussion. Using a named account to deceptively appear to be someone different in order to reinforce your point ""I'm with the anon IP here"" is prohibited. You can continue contributing with this account or while logged off but doing both is inappropriate and will lead to a block. — "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000051	0.002281
" == Trivia? == ""he ridiculous plot of having an actor come in and train for only a few days to become a spy/soldier rather than just have a spy do the job is a direct parody of Armageddon, where they had oil drillers come in and learn to become astronauts in a few days rather than just have astronauts learn to drill. It also indirectly parodies the idea in many Hollywood blockbuster movies that an untrained person in a completely unrelated field can come in and do the job of a highly trained soldier, spy, astronaut, etc."" - surely this is a reference to earlier films such as Rocky?"	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000597	0.000339

" ::Hrm, cheers. I typically advise my adoptees against simulating Mediawiki interfaces, or if they must, not making the message exactly the same as it would be in a ""real"" new messages situation. – "

0false

0.00001

. References used in the article from The Economic Times, NDTV, The Times of India and Business Standard are reputed newspaper and news agency In and around the world.

0false

0.00001

Chungho is actually spelled Jhonghe See: and

0false

0.00001

" == The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy == In your last revert, you wrote, ""rv: the point is, HHG redirects here, so someone typing that while looking for High Harmonic Generation might end up here instead"". I agree with what you wrote but, unfortunately, that is not what the text says. It actually says: This article is about the franchise. Several terms redirect here; see The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy (disambiguation), Hitchhiker's Guide (disambiguation) and High Harmonic Generation. And High Harmonic Generation does not redirect here. In fact, none of the three pages listed redirects here. So what the text says is wrong, and so misleading. You did not like my solution to this problem; do you have a solution? (Please respond here or on the article's Talk page.) "

0false

0.000013

0.00003

we beat them in every thing love the west for students

0false

0.00001

0.000011

If this is included, it should just be a sentence. Presently it is an accusation and it is under investigation. Someone earlier reminded everyone that Wikipedia is not a news source. The biography of a living person is not a place for every detail of an accusation such as this. For now, one sentence should suffice. If readers want detail, they can do their own Google search. I think we would all do well to imagine if an accusation about us was being publicly debated by anonymous strangers.

0false

0.000274

0.000475

==haha== what vandalism, idiot? ''''

1true

0false

1true

0false

1true

0false

0.00001

:Heh. I wasn't aware that providing a link to a discussion was considered 'favourable comments'. Shame on you, nae'blis!(jk)

0false

0.001104

0.000024

== AfD == Why? It's very sourced and I took lots of pictures (

0false

0.00001

0.000011

" ==Snug Harbor== Hi. I moved the article formerly at ""Snug Harbor"" to ""Snug Harbor, New Orleans"" and made ""Snug Harbor"" into a disambiguation. Note, never try to ""move"" a page by copy and paste; that loses page history and creates other problems; use the page move feature Help:Moving a page. I'm in the process of cleaning things up. I believe the easiest way to take care of things is if you would please copy your text from this edit and paste it at Snug Harbor, Staten Island. (Note: If you think the title should be something different than ""Snug Harbor, Staten Island"", please let me know or use the page move feature as I mentioned. Thanks! Cheers, "

0false

0.00001

0.000011

:::His editing patterns have been erratic over the last year (or more?). Prior to January (roughly 400 edits ago), made a few edits in September, then it reaches back to March. The edits you were looking at are a bit more myopic than what I was looking at.

0false

0.000015

0.000634

==Third party in the Atari/Sears list== Air Raid belongs in the third party list

0false

0.00001

0.000011

" ::::I ask again, please quote where Reich mentions Aryan migration. "

0false

0.00001

::Precisely, I think bicontinental is the perfect term in such a case. Even Turkey is a bicontinental country; so Turks should have no problems in saying that Cyprus is culturally a part of Europe. We have to mention in which continent Cyprus actually lies in.

0false

0.001074

0.000018

" ::::I don't actually see a difference in the spacing in the footers at those links from May 17 and May 18, 2005. Both say ""Copyright © 1999 - 2005 Go Daddy Software, Inc"", and at the top of the page, both show the logo with a space and include the string ""The Go Daddy Girl"", and within the page they both say ""GoDaddy salutes our soldiers"". But I'm not objecting to moving the page. — "

0false

0.000014

0.000017

== Nice == Haha. That is some nice work 71.5.70.130. You gotta appreciate some quality vandalism. My vandalism days are over, but I can still appreciate the work of others. Keep it up.

0false

0.00001

0.000026

:I'm actually neutral about this, just heard it over the radio and transfer the information here. I'm surprise that a factual statement could draw such responses. But really ... I've no interest except to clarify the fact.

0false

0.000014

0.000018

== American Idiot Sales? == The sales of American Idiot on this page are 22 million worldwide which outsells Dookie on 20 million. However, Dookie is claimed on its own Wikipedia page to be Green Day's biggest commercial success and American Idiot's own Wikipedia page says it has sold less than fifteen million. Can someone please clear this up? Thank you

0false

0.000435

0.000173

"be blocked from editing Wikipedia. "

0false

0.00001

:I did some minor editing to what you added. I was kinda gearing towards what Back to December has but you changed it on me (again) lol! -

0false

0.00001

0.000011

" I am afraid that I just do not see the bias. Can you give a specific example? I do not think that the article is arguing ""for"" or ""against"" anything at all. It is merely providing an account of current research in this area. I do not think any Wikipedia article is a place to provide arguments ""for"" or ""against"" such things. "

0false

0.000012

0.000018

"I don't see how this movie is ""science fiction"". There are no futuristic or unrealized technologies used. It's all current science. "

0false

0.00001

0.000026

:Confirmed - thanks for fixing it!

0false

0.00001

LETS CLEAR SOMETHING UP I have done extensive research on the double homicide (1981) you mentioned and the earlier murder committed by the same person in 1969 in New Plymouth. 99% of the recollections of the details are always wrong and the case has wrongly become a legend rather than a horrendous double homicide. I have studied the court notes, scene examinations, pathologists reports, witness statements and even the statements by the accused and believe me, its not easy to digest. A couple of things I can clear up though: the “house across the road from the pub” is not the location. The legend/rumour about “excised genitalia” is just that – legend. These murders were, however, horrific and not really something that needs to be described on the internet.

0false

0.000041

0.000232

I... err... what?

0false

0.00001

I am not a sock puppet == Hello my good friend. Can you please un-block me? I was only trying to stick up for my friend. I don't think I break any wikipedia rules in doing so. So can you please un-block me? I have had to use a IP adress as I'm Not a sock pupperter Thank You ==

0false

0.000636

0.000044

== Template:Deletebecause == I'm letting you know I reverted your changes to this template. # If no reason is provided {{d}} {{del}} or {{delete}} are better options. # It's blatantly obvious if someone didn't provide a reason ({{1}} would show instead of the reason) and it makes the template longer unneccesarily. P.S. I just remembered that I also reverted your style changes. Feel free to put those back... Mgm

0false

0.00001

0.000045

*Brownie USA Derogatory name to refer to brown mexican people

0false

0.000019

0.00001

Malleus Fatuorum: You're quite the condescending asshole. Who changes your diaper for you? Seems it's due.

1true

0false

1true

0false

1true

0false

0.999727

0.953852

" ::As well, most countries in Asia have horrible relations with their neighbours ''' (') "

0false

0.000077

0.000013

clean-up Sorry guys, I had to cut a bunch of stuff out. It really isn't relevant in an encyclopedia whether or not a building has a Kids Club or 184 two bedroom apartments. Also, since this is the Internet and all, links to other pages are nice.

0false

0.051958

0.000037

:I'm going to disagree with you. He was not officially placed on the 40-man roster, and did not play a game for the Jays in 2013 or 2014. The usual criteria for listing a team in the right hand sidebar is that he played for the team.

0false

0.000011

0.000016

== Ibert == If Ibert belongs here at all (and I think of him as a no-hit wonder), I'd vote for Divertissement, not Escales. At least the waltz was turned into some intro music for some radio show many years ago on the BBC. Any arguments?

0false

0.000012

0.000039

: I've removed the box and replaced it with . I still have suspicions, though. Your unblock request will be reviewed by someone uninvolved. Sincerely,

0false

0.00001

0.000011

REDIRECT Talk:The English High School

0false

0.00001

== Move request == Bulgarian–Greco relations → – Naming convention is country names in alphabetical order and endash between copuntry names. I mistakenly moved the page to the current title (copy/paste error), and there is an edited redirect in the way for this move.

0false

0.00001

0.000329

chris is a good a ctor on zoey

0false

0.00001

:This is not how to gain consensus. You have been reverted by 3 different editors and have simply editwarred to enforce your POV.

0false

0.00001

Please do not vandalize articles. This sort of offense can include inserting nonsense into articles, blanking articles, or otherwise changing articles with obviously unwanted content. This serves no other purpose than creating more work for Wikipedia's editors and administrators. If you do continue, your account and/or IP will be blocked. July 2, 2005 03:24 (UTC)

0false

0.000019

0.000026

the earth is clearly flat and not round

0false

0.00001

Except for the formula for ICER, this article is about cost-effectiveness analysis in general, and does not explain the uses or rationale of ICER in particular whatsoever. I'd fix it if I could, but I came looking for the answer myself. ( )

0false

0.00001

It is ridiculous but congrats all the same ! The Pathan thing is outrageous. They probably won't even read what they copy-paste. As for plagiarism, this piece was copied from a vandalised version of the World Cup article by an idiot journalist who put it in Financial Express (the real BCCI President was NKP Salve).

1true

0false

1true

0false

1true

0false

0.567003

0.001534

masturbation, can we conclude

1true

0false

1true

0false

0.00001

::::::::To remind only:This is not a reduplication of that article.(b) Your tagging and assertions of WP:OR and WP:SYNTH show you do not understand those policies, since the description of the content of the page in the lead, in response to your charges, is sourced to books and articles describing the POV that considers such things as certain kinds of house demolition, and property damage, as a form of violence. That is not 'original research', not a synthesis: it is referencing.

0false

0.00001

0.000012

ONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITONLY STUPID NIGGERS LIKE ANTANDRUS LIKES THIS SHITV

1true

0false

1true

1.00001

0.999993

::You science people are revolting. Can't you just stick with that tufty rat with white underparts? In other news, my oldest daughter announced she wants to be a scientist. I tried to steer her toward animals, but she likes volcanoes much more. I want her to be an archeologist, so I can visit her in Greece when she's digging up stuff. Then again, I also want her to be a lesbian, but her latest marriage is to some guy called Jason. I think. It could be Cayden. Or Kayson.

0false

0.010595

0.00175

:Jia Dao, Li HouzhuSu, Su Shi, Tao Yuanming

0false

0.000012

0.00001

" It's not ""merely"" a single incident. A single incident can be significant enough to deserve one or more sections and sub-sections devoted to the topic. It's a professor using hate language and the consequences he faces for his actions. For the record, My Very Best wrote, ""I certainly agree with your last edit in this article and think all current refs are valid, such as that one included by you. Same with other refs, such as this,this, (same source) here and this, they also should be used. Main point here: these sources are reliable enough to source his own words, for example in his interview included by you."" and ""I must agree with MarshallBagramyan. Based on the discussion and sources so far, this article appear to be a case of self-promotion [1] by a marginally notable individual who is mostly known (based on sources quoted so far) for a genocide denial and ethnically motivated slander. There are multiple sources which are reliable enough to quote his own words on campus."" The issue of notability in this regard, that is, before My Very Best knew about his scholarly works, is irrelevant. His position on that section is clear enough and your allusion that this probably falls under WP:UNDUE and should be diluted is fallacious, to say the least. "

0false

0.000023

0.000375

(fuck you Osama bin laden and your afghanistani terrorist cunts)

1true

0false

1true

0false

1true

0.998548

0.00714

== The Anderson House == This one is tricky because both sides have valid points. I need to hunt down references to support it but I undestand the Southern argument that the house was in such a commanding position that it really was not suitable as a hospital, and putting a hospital flag on it to prevent if from being used that way was unacceptable. On the other hand the lack of attention to defending it suggests that Mulligan's intentions were that it would be sufficiently in the rear that it would be a good site. My personal interpretation is that he or someone before him miscalculated and assumed that there would not be any force chosing to place itself between there and the river. At any rate, I see both sides as having merit. Similarly, when it was taken the Federals who retook it had been instructed to consider those holding it in violation of the Laws of War. The MSG inside didn't just up and surrender, they were overwhelmed and compelled to surrender after inflicting considerable casualties. Again, both points of view have some validity. Interestingly, those who executed the men in the hospital don't seem to have been singled out and executed by the MSG following the battle. (That is the sort of outcome I would have expected if the MSG commanders felt strongly in the right on this.)

0false

0.000025

0.000089

" The use of the term ""unethical"" is highly prejudicial. See also WP:BLP. I have listed this at WP:BLPN. '''' "

0false

0.00001

". :Good editor Isheden can warn you that I am a fundamentalist about insisting on convex ""minimization"" unless stationary-points/saddlepoints or convex maximization be also considered"

0false

0.000747

0.000076

| decline=I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that *the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or *the block is no longer necessary because you *#understand what you have been blocked for, *#will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and *#will make useful contributions instead. Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. }}

0false

0.000032

0.000126

" :If a single person set it up to reflect his own interests and ideas, then yes, it is of a personal nature. Only if it were the product of a scholastic institution, with multiple, peer reviewed contributors and academically rigorous testing, could it be considered impartial. "

0false

0.00001

0.000025

" :I am afraid I blanked Forensic podiatry for investigation at WP:CP, because while you did attempt to fix the problem which is great, the article is still a close paraphrase of the original source. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me on my . '''''' "

0false

0.00001

0.000011

Selena Gomez the truth You all have heard about her from her shows and stuff but what you don't know is THE TRUTH!!! Selena looks absolutely FABULOUS..............too bad shes A GUY. yes people a sports loving chick hunting guy! she only looks like a girl is because she was a guy before plastic surgery..........and thats not all!!!! shes really BISEXUAL!!!! SELENA GOMEZ LIKES BOTH SEXES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!SHE SUCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! by:roxi96

1true

0false

0.000973

0.0001

" :No good reason was given, unless this means something: ""You guys are an absolute disgrace to WP and to mankind! I'll leave you now to destroy the page in any way you want."" "

0false

0.927686

0.006937

== You deleted the Belmont Blog???? == Are you for real? You are like a 2nd grader erasing a College Professor's PhD thesis..... What balls you have.... I don't even know where to begin at the chutzpah you have.... Belmont Club had 100,000 posts of some of the best geo-political and social observations around, BAR NONE... From world history, current events, politics, science and more the community of posts are well thought out, reasoned and spirited... You sir are a disgrace!

1true

0false

1true

0false

0.018983

0.001071

== wow... ur an idiot == don't do something stupid mate shut the hell up if u don't like what people say

1true

0false

1true

0false

1true

0false

1.00001

0.99341

NOBODY CARES that you can try and fake, or manufacture, a mathematical equation to concur with your BS.shyjayb

0false

0.000058

0.000011

== 'Future' Section needs to add Momoa's name to those reprising their roles.. == Jason Momoa will most likely (see: is expected) to reprise his role as Aquaman in the Justice League film as well. That should be added to the page.

0false

0.00001

0.000029

== Replicated == Statistics where copied from 'Feminism' and are now marked as neutrality disputed in that article. I'm not sure if it is a good idea to copy it rather than using the existing link since the any changes will have to be manually added like this.

0false

0.00001

" == GA Review #2 == {{#if:???|{{#ifeq:|Talk||}}}} :GA review (see here for criteria) #It is reasonably well written. #:a (prose): b (MoS): #:: #It is factually accurate and verifiable. #:a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): #:: #It is broad in its coverage. #:a (major aspects): b (focused): #:: #It follows the neutral point of view policy. #:Fair representation without bias: #:: #It is stable. #:No edit wars etc.: #:: #It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. #:a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions): #:: #Overall: #:Pass/Fail: #:: Just a few little things. Interesting article! — () "

0false

0.000171

0.000528

== External Links == Regarding your edits to Brookville, Pennsylvania: please recall that external links should not normally be used in the body of an article. In other words, it is inappropriate to use external links in the way one would use internal wikilinks. Thank you. —

0false

0.00001

0.000506

::::::::That's a talk page discussion, not a policy you can quote.

0false

0.00001

::::You are welcome to propose those articles for deletion if you believe they do not meet our criteria.

0false

0.00001

" You do understand you are risking a block if you re-add an unsourced ""child sexual abuse"" again, right? "

0false

0.013006

0.000017

A Written Oirat Translation of the Yanggu Meyen(The HundredChapters) http://ir.library.tohoku.ac.jp/re/bitstream/10097/44075/1/AA1115837409010.pdf http://www.cneas.tohoku.ac.jp/asia013.html http://www.cneas.tohoku.ac.jp/img/pu01/asia013/07.pdf http://www.rinrokaku.com/wp-content/uploads/manmoku/m130_foreign.pdf https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/gengo1939/1954/25/1954_25_1/_pdf

0false

0.000025

0.000013

"::::Yet there are equally reliable sources that say the Christ Myth theory is something more than simply Jesus never existed as evidenced by Grant and Walsh as just two examples. As for what I mean by ""'Jesus existed but the Gospel Jesus is a myth-fiction' Idea"" that is simply my rephrasing of the category Remsburg and Boyd-Eddy gave us nearly 100 years apart: ::::Remsburg (1909): ""Many radical Freethinkers believe that Christ is a myth, of which Jesus of Nazareth is the basis, but that these narratives are so legendary and contradictory as to be almost if not wholly, unworthy of credit."" ::::Boyd-Eddy (2007): We have enough to show there was a Jesus but ""the reports we have of him are so unreliable and saturated with legend and ""myth"" that we can ascertain very little historical information about him."" ::::Again what separates ""the reports we have of him are so unreliable and saturated with legend and ""myth"" that we can ascertain very little historical information about him"" and ""narratives are so legendary and contradictory as to be almost if not wholly, unworthy of credit"" from there is nothing to show the Gospel Jesus (the version we base all our searches on) ever existed? That is the elephant in the room regarding the whole Christ myth theory and the most poorly explained aspect. "

0false

0.000046

0.000038

:: I got the explanation of the removal on my page, My mistake, regards

0false

0.000022

0.00001

" ==Comparison of representation of various states== The apportionment chart currently compares Israel, North Korea, the United States, India, and China. Does anyone have any other suggestions for comparions? I compared Israel and North Korea to show how North Korea's population advantage is neutralized by its ""Not free"" status under the Provisional People's Assembly method and by its relatively weak GDP under the Schwartzberg Weighted Voting method. "

0false

0.00001

0.000014

" as well the biologist Jerry Coyne's review of one of D. S. Wilson's books, wherein he takes him to task re group selection: :::::""Group selection isn’t widely accepted by evolutionists for several reasons. First, it’s not an efficient way to select for traits, like altruistic behavior, that are supposed to be detrimental to the individual but good for the group. Groups divide to form other groups much less often than organisms reproduce to form other organisms, so group selection for altruism would be unlikely to override the tendency of each group to quickly lose its altruists through natural selection favoring cheaters. Further, we simply have little evidence that selection on groups has promoted the evolution of any trait. Finally, other, more plausible evolutionary forces, like direct selection on individuals for reciprocal support, could have made us prosocial. :::::These reasons explain why only a few biologists, like Wilson and E. O. Wilson (no relation), advocate group selection as the evolutionary source of cooperation."" ::::"

0false

0.000032

0.000352

To explain my point, how would you react if I started contributing to the Christian pages with the material that shows that all Christian priests are either peadophile or homosexuals, and all the Christian nuns offer sexual favours to the high-ranking Christian clergy, and all the Chritian monks are drunkards and homosexuals? The point is, an extremely small minority of Devadasis actually offered sex to the temple visitors, so there is no point in smearing all Devadasis. If I start portraying Islam as a religion of terrorists, I am sure everyone would object as I object to Devadasis being called prostitutes. Dear Sango,

0false

0.000154

0.00156

I've only ever heard this described as Factory Meat

0false

0.00001

Testing talk page

0false

0.00001

::::::::::What you disagree he's an idiot, or that it is wrong to call him that?

1true

0false

1true

0false

1true

0false

1.00001

0.000136

==WikiProject Houston== Attacked!! see WikiProject Houston for report and mission details.

0false

0.00001

" ==Copyright Violation Allegations== Hi, I am responding to your claims you made recently on my talk page. You may not be aware that I am the chairman of a rather large rail user group, and either: 1) Have explicit copyright rights from various organisations 2) Have contributed many images to various websites 3) Any images that are from copyrighted sources can be edited, (even if slight), to waive copyright protection The majority of my images are self-taken photographs, and if you visit the image gallery at my website, www.mcrc.co.nr, you may find some of these images - that does not neseccarily mean that I have to provide evidence that they are my own work. Im sure you will agree that the majority of my images are of rail stations which are fairly hard to visit. Am I right in assuming that Wikipedia is enforced in association with US Copyright Law and definitions? S. Thomson :''The images I deleted were clearly taken from copyright sites such as the BBC, and at the same low resolution used on these sites. If you originally took these photographs and own the copyright on them, may I suggest you upload the original high-res images instead. Further information can be found at Wikipedia:Copyrights. — / "

0false

0.000065

0.000061

::I think you make some really good points. I do think when someone designs a building it can be years before it's built or breaks ground. Let me check if there are any other sources to verify.

0false

0.00001

== Scoreboard == According to EBU's own page on ESC 2001, both Bosnia & Hercegovina and Russia gave their 12 points to France, but on the scoreboard on this page, their 12 points go to Estonia.

0false

0.00001

0.000014

" :::::::::Quit the crap. You have degenerated and mis-represented what was a useful conversation. Signing off. North8000 "

0false

0.999957

0.000058

Good catch of Bloodgood's white lie; sounds like he was a clever and slipperly fellow.

0false

0.00001

0.000015

::This editor seems to be spinning out of control again perhaps you could have a look at this and offer some assistance.

0false

0.00001

"DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE. This archive page covers approximately the dates between April 2005 and July 2005. Post replies to the main talk page, copying the section you are replying to if necessary. Archived discussions: * Talk:Voluntary Student Unionism/Archive 1/Archive 1, Talk:Voluntary Student Unionism/Archive 1/Archive 2 Hrmm, 3 paragraphs for VSU, 7 against. This seems a little biased. I'll try and beef up the pro side if I know the zealots won't delete it. how many universities would be effected by Federal enactment of VSU? All of the publicly owned ones (ie. not Bond or ACU;): to my knowledge, there's not a single public uni in Australia where student organisation membership is currently optional. ==Motivations of the ALSF== The article states (or should state): *Liberal Students argue strongly for VSU on the basis of freedom of association and other grounds; *They deny the charge that they are arguing for VSU on the basis of political disadvantage for their opponents; *VSU advocates on the other hand consistently and routinely accuse Liberals of supporting the change for political motivations. I will undo any changes to the article that do not substantially agree with this situation, as it is simply a matter of objective fact, favouring no particular side. ===== I don't know why you are bringing so much politics into this. ""Liberal Students argue strongly for VSU on the basis of freedom of association and other grounds"" Thats a very big blanket statement. So you are saying Liberal Students, as a whole, fit your reasoning? You can't possibly know that unless you have questioned every one. Thats what I'm objecting to. FYI I'm not a liberal, and wish Latham had won. I do support freedom of choice. By the way, I apoligize for the 'commie' remark. :That's perfectly alright. Politics plays a very large part in this: it is a point of conflict over the government's legislation after all, and was debated by both sides in the House of Representatives and the Senate when it came up, with the Liberals arguing in favour of VSU and Labor arguing in favour of USU. At the last election, the ALP's policy supported USU and the Coalition supported VSU. ::Yes, but you are missing my point. I objected to the blanket language that implied that _all_ students who identified as X thought Y. :And the ""freedom of choice"" argument really only appears because some students argue that they should be free to choose not to support the politics of their student organisation. ::Hang on, I don't follow you here. Personally I think that Student Unions should stay out of politics not directly relating to education. Even if the unions didn't play politican, I still would support VSU. If some students want bands, clubs, so-called subsidised food etc, they should pay for it themselves. The ""Freedom of Choice"" argument still applies even if you ignore the political side of things. By contrast, if a Liberal group gained control of a USU supporter's student organisation, that USU supporter would still not argue in favour of VSU because they still support USU philosophically (as indeed has happened at a few campuses). So the ""freedom of choice"" argument is underlined by differences in political opinion. If there was no objection to the political content, the advocates wouldn't be arguing the need to make the choice. :: I disagree. See above. :The point is, I'm not taking a stand one way or the other over whether Liberals *are* supporting it for political motivations, I'm saying that USU supporters *say* that Liberals are supporting it for political motivations (Many sources for this: virtually every NUS press release argues this point). If, as you say, you're not a Liberal, this clearly doesn't apply to you. The article mentions that VSU supporters deny this claim. NPOV policy simply requires that we detail the substance of both sides' arguments without putting a judgement on their validity. (. . .) :Hi, Anon. In future, please use headings and sign your posts, otherwise this talk page just gets messy. Well it appears that any time I try a

0false

0.000804

0.000365

:I did not delete any article. I reverted your edits to Frank Walker as they overwrote an existing page.

0false

0.00001

0.000022

" 2015 (UTC) :::More power to you for finishing the page. That doesn't mean all the assorted trivia having nothing whatever to do with Fisher isn't still junk. That Fisher became notorious because of somebody else does not mean Häyhänen's troubles or stupid behavior belongs on this page. Since they're his actions, they belong, if anywhere, on his own page. More to the point, I see no valid rationale whatever for including the codenames of people who have their own pages & comments about Cohen who has her own page. I don't see you explaining, & since you want it in, it's incumbent on you. 05:52, 26 November"

0false

0.003332

0.000978

:They play in state cups, such as Copa Paulista de Futebol or Copa Santa Catarina. Most states have state cups.

0false

0.00001

0.000203

" == Is the ""Kifu"" recording system used to record Shogi games? == Kifu is the system for recording games of Go. Since pieces never move in Go once placed on the board, Kifu records a game by drawing a diagram of the board in the end position and numbering each piece to show on which move it was placed. The Kifu topic page was included in category Shogi, and said that it was also used for Shogi, but I see nothing on this page about it and I don't see how it would be applicable to a game where the pieces move about. I've removed all references to Shogi on the Kifu page, but on the off-chance that it is in some way connected I'm leaving this request for more info here. Maybe Kifu is Japanese for ""game record"" or something and is a general term used by Shogi players? If it is relevant please update the Kifu page and its talk page accordingly, and the Shogi page as well; if it isn't please confirm here? Thanks. "

0false

0.000011

0.000082

== Contested deletion == OnTel Rocket MePhone DigitalPhone RtcDialer Ring2Home Call2Desh KingTel KingBird BdMoittry JedMoittry MusMoittry SdaCall2Desh SaudiNet FatafatiXpress 1Pinless DmmMoittry AdbRing2Home Mb3Moittry DxbMoittry FerareDialer Sim2Sim MadeenaPlus Talk2Phone Xtravoip Mobile2Talk BetterPhone Bd24 Goldren plus Mvoice BdKing আপনার প্রিয়জনের সাথে কথা বলুন.আর এই সেবাটুকুই আমরা আপনাদেরকে দেয়ার নিশ্চিয়তা দিতেছি।সৌদি আরব, ওমান, কাতার, মিশর, ইরাক, সংযুক্ত আরব আমিরাত, লিবিয়া বিশ্বের যেকোনো দেশে কল করা যায় 100 Usd Doller 6900 Taka সু-খবর- সু-খবর!!! একই রিসেলারে সব সুবিধা !!!!সু-খবর- সু-খবর !!! আনলিমিটেড রিচার্জ সিস্টেম এন্ড মোবাইল ব্যাঙ্কিং সুবিধা !! ফ্লেক্সিলোড (বাংলাদেশ,ইন্ডিয়া,পাকিস্তান,নেপাল,শ্রীলংকা.) অটো রিচার্জ সিস্টেম- আমাদের সার্ভিস গুলো হচ্ছে: ১.ফ্লেক্সিলোড 2.বিকাশ ৩.মোবাইল ব্যাঙ্কিং ৪.ইন্টারন্যাশনাল রিচার্জ ৫.বিল পে ৬.বাংলাদেশ ব্যাঙ্ক ট্রান্সফার ৭.এস. এম এস সুবিধা আমরা মনে করি, আমাদের সার্ভিস অবশ্যই আপনাদের ভাল লাগবে*** আমাদের পেমেন্ট করার পদ্দতি গুলো • বাংলাদেশ (Brac bank,Islami bank) • দুবাই (NBD bank, Mashreq Bank,Islamic bank) • সৌদিআরব (Alrajhi Bank,NCB Bank) • ওমান (Muscat Bank) আপনার যেকোনো প্রয়োজনে যোগাযোগ করুন - CONTACT INFO: SUPPORT: MOBILE NUMBER +8801558-11419 WHATSAPP NUMBER: +8801558-11419 VIBER NUMBER +8801558-11419 IMO NUMBER: +8801558-11419 Reseller: Level-4 Level-3, Level-2, Level-1 Available'

0false

0.124744

0.062909

" = = = This is one man's reaction to the ""April 12, 2015 Rewrite"", This is meant for ""Toothpickst"", and other readers (but mostly meant for those readers in the accident-investigation community): ==> This ""rewrite"" of 12Apr2015 ONLY SHOWS ""the Boeing Scenario"", a false-narrative that was refuted by Yorke in November 1984. QUESTION for the ""rewriter"": ?Why not explicitly state, in the opening-heading, the fact that your ""rewrite"" merely recites that false-narrative listed as P.C. in AAR81-8? Meanwhile, that mythap-Captain (H.G. Gibson) recently died with NO RETRACTION of the erroneous ""probable cause"" cited in NTSB's AAR81-8. For students and investigators: Wikipedia so far suffers, it fails to reflect a better explanation of the failure interactions related to ""discrepant Rudder"". For those readers better capable of such technical details, instead of this ""Wiki"", consider the lessons from George Schairer's paper on the B307 upset-breakup (18Mar39), consider the CAB's investigation of AA Flt One (1Mar62), upset-recovery of Mac59402 (11Nov76). As of this current-wiki ""rewrite"" of April2015, this Wiki contributes that old deception rumors from the INITIAL upset of TWA841/4Apr79. [Any technical-corrections to this wiki were removed by the those experts contributing to this Wiki.]"

0false

0.000018

0.000046

" == WikiProject Queensland/To-do == I noticed you created the page Wikipedia:WikiProject Queensland/To-do last October but it is not being used. However on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Queensland page there is a ""Things you can do"" section with tasks listed. I was wanting to add the WP Qld tasks to my page but there is no point until the to-do list problem is resolved. Is something wrong with the setup or are articles being listed incorrectly or what? Please advise, thanks. - "

0false

0.00001

0.000018

== another rat! == Congrats again!

0false

0.00001

. just two seconds ago, bird scientists just fucking called me and said that the bird is absolutely is not the word

0false

1.00001

0.99977

" ::::Maybe the second, because MN.com is used also with the direct link in GAs songs. Also the sheet book can be used as reference. "

0false

0.00001

0.000011

" :Just so you know I did revert myself, sorry again. "

0false

0.00001

0.000011

" : That seems reasonable. Do you know whether that book had a lasting influence or was it just a topic of conversation that died out? How was it received in mainstream academic circles? "

0false

0.000157

0.000061

== All admins must DIE! == prepare for your death, Banno!

1true

0false

1true

0false

0.00001

0.000019

:Doh...okay, I was having a gray moment...totally forgot Kyo P

0false

0.00001

" ===A friendly notice=== You may want to peruse our policy on misusing multiple identities before you comment further in the Mail forwarding discussion. Using a named account to deceptively appear to be someone different in order to reinforce your point ""I'm with the anon IP here"" is prohibited. You can continue contributing with this account or while logged off but doing both is inappropriate and will lead to a block. — "

0false

0.000051

0.002281

" == Trivia? == ""he ridiculous plot of having an actor come in and train for only a few days to become a spy/soldier rather than just have a spy do the job is a direct parody of Armageddon, where they had oil drillers come in and learn to become astronauts in a few days rather than just have astronauts learn to drill. It also indirectly parodies the idea in many Hollywood blockbuster movies that an untrained person in a completely unrelated field can come in and do the job of a highly trained soldier, spy, astronaut, etc."" - surely this is a reference to earlier films such as Rocky?"

0false

0.000597

0.000339