comment_text
stringlengths
1
5k
toxic
class label
2 classes
severe_toxic
class label
2 classes
obscene
class label
2 classes
threat
class label
2 classes
insult
class label
2 classes
identity_hate
class label
2 classes
prediction_hate
float64
0
1
prediction_nsfw
float64
0
1
:::::I am saying that the Committee discussion leading to this block is private, as I would think is apparent from my unwillingness to discuss it with you.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.000011
Tennis wasn't an Olympic sport during her playing career. It returned to the Olympics in 1988, long after King retired.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.000012
:The category is listed on Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Working for eventual deletion. Do not worry about it (unless it appears at WP:DRV). Thanks. To save me worrying too much, I've moved your reply over ;)
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.00001
::::England did not conquer Scotland. The Scottish king James VI became King of England in 1603 with the death of his cousin, Elizbeth I, merging the crowns to form the Kingdom of Great Britain. The Parliaments of the two countries were merged with the Acts of Union of 1707. No offence, but your view of politics is very polarized. If a people view themselves as having a state, then they do - that should be the only criterion. You cannot impose your own views on Wikipedia. —
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000014
0.000076
::You were a liar last year and you are still a liar now, but that's all I say because I don't want to be blocked. Have no fear, I will be going RTV and will not be bothering you anymore.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.98863
0.027636
" :::What?? No one is all that interested in Coprophagy??? Back when my offspring was young, the first time the guinea pig did that, it was apparently fascinating, at least if the cries of ""ewww gross!"" were any indication! LOL! "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000014
0.000039
Just added the Number One First Baseman winner of Gold Gloves picture over that of the second most. Added the first ever 1B winner of GG that was a consolidated award for both leagues.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000012
0.000011
== Türkmen in black == I guess the denomination of 'türkmen in black', used twice in this article, is some kind of joke...
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000893
0.001338
"==GA Review== :This review is transcluded from Talk:Number 13-class battleship/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. Reviewer:   · {| class=""wikitable"" style=""text-align:left"" |- valign=""top"" ! width=""30"" | Rate ! width=""300""| Attribute ! | Review Comment |- valign=""top"" | colspan=""3"" | 1. |- valign=""top"" | colspan=""3"" | 2. |- valign=""top"" | colspan=""3"" | 3. |- valign=""top"" | colspan=""3"" | 6. |}"
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.000013
"BTW, DAP Racing looks like you could get it to GA without too much trouble!♦ "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000011
0.00001
What the hell is a Cine Capri? This article doesn't explain anything.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.999983
0.315417
==New standards for wikipedia presidential hopefuls' article. Mention sex, I'm not kidding== What's this about Rudy can't get an erection? Must be some anti-Rudy folks editing. There's even a reference. How about mentioning Bill Clinton's crooked penis, which is a true statement. Seriously, we need warnings on the top of these articles or people will think all of wikipedia is wacky, not just the articles of presidential hopefuls.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.001153
0.000615
:::OK done. I've lifted the block and left them an apology. In general, the two places I point people to are Wikipedia:External links and Wikipedia:Spam. Some spam linkers like this one can be well intentioned - they assume that anyone reading each one of the pages would also be interested in their web site. Unfortunately the link templates aren't entirely appropriate for cases like this as they tend to be a little brusque and only partially point to policy. Hopefully they will return with the good edits.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000018
0.000087
" :::::It also says ""not damaged"", implying that if something is not intact, then it is damaged. Perhaps you only meant ""having all of its parts"", but for someone else, that is, the majority of people, who understand ""intact"" as meaning ""not damaged"", using that word to describe an uncircumcised penis is an extremely biased and loaded usage. If for whatever reason you don't like ""uncircumcised"", then just say ""not circumcised"". But ""intact"" brings in all kinds of loaded meanings that are inherently POV and completely unacceptable. "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000028
0.000068
==MILHIST initial assessment== Despite extensive citations, they are incomplete and two different styles are in use(in text and inline). So can only be start class but could easily go to B and beyond if this were addressed
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.00001
==Eyðing þjóðernishyggju== Sæll! Þú mættir gjarnan láta í ljós skoðun á Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Icelandic_nationalism, ef mér hefir þá tekizt að setja þetta á réttan stað. Cheerio
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000047
0.000193
" == Why are you marking my images for deletion? == I uploaded and I am the copyright holder myself, and specified all of the correct attributes for both of those images: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:FFX_screenshot_from_Play!1.jpg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Screenshot_of_FFX_on_Play!2.jpg I have no idea what you want by asking me for permission of my own uploaded and own created content, but I can't comply if you don't clearly tell me what I did wrong in giving the images a re-usable license. You are being ridiculous. What ""evidence of permission"" do you want? Other than the fact that I made the images myself and uploaded them here and absolutely nowhere else and gave them the appropriate license, I can't give any more permission/validation than what there is now, under free-use and original content distribution."
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.020839
0.000155
" :::::::[Feels the need to post, even though presumably everybody gets it. She wants to display another badass sig.] That's me, you know! '''' , "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.001646
0.000246
- The picture accompanying the text is of an MC-130H Talon II. Gunships have guns.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.00001
:::: The show doesn't encourage risky behavior, unless you're a monkey. Monkey see, monkey do. Are you a monkey?
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.99997
0.0075
The Quad Cities in Il/Ia also has it on 4.2 WHBF.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.00001
:Like the general direction the changes are going in, but now the order is screwed up. I think Pareto should go first and then be contrasted with K-H so I'm changing that again
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000011
0.000011
You are one slow and persistent motherfucker, can you read?
1true
0false
1true
0false
1true
0false
0.994877
0.000023
" ::::Thanks for finding more. While I'm not sure that those links which are simply reviews of Lanix products help determine notability (notability is different than existence; we know Lanix exists, but simply being a Mexican maker of computers and mobiles isn't necessarily notable.), I think a good way to determine notability would be finding citations that support some of the uncited claims the page makes. For example, someone added ""Lanix has seen sustained growth since 2005"", and that Lanix has the 3rd or 4th largest market share in Latin America's consumer electronics sector. If you could find sources that support such assertions, those would really help determine notability. As WP:Notability says, ""'Significant coverage' means that sources address the subject directly in detail..."", and so reviews of Lanix products or a single mention in passing really can't be considered ""significant coverage"". Do you understand? I don't want to be rude because you've gone to all that trouble, but proof of existence doesn't automatically mean a topic deserves and article. "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000025
0.000036
== Yes, listen. == She SHOULD be founder! And i'm one of the best people here at Wikipedia, Violet. Please, though, she should be founder or top admin. She deserves it, she warned you about a hacker! E-mail her and disscuss it!
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.079645
0.000247
== Northumbrian etymology == I saw your user name and wanted to tell you I've been listening to lectures from the Teaching Company about the Vikings, and yes Northumbrian means north of the Humber river in Britain. Good user name.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000011
0.000368
Yes, I think some of this should be included but I think we shorten the Jack Thompson section. If we can make the Glen Beck section the same length as what could be chopped off the Jack Thompson section then that will give us the same word count with an extra section, just an idea, I know he's the most vocal opponent of the GTA franchise but I've always thought that Jack Thompson's section in this article was too long.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000012
0.00003
It is felt that the article you created at Amin nazari is not suitable for a Wikipedia article, which must have a notable subject and be verifiable. I have moved it to , which is where users are free to write about themselves. You are at liberty to move it back into the (Main) namespace but bear in mind that if you do so, it is likely to be nominated for deletion. Note, however, that the purpose of a user page is to enable active editors of Wikipedia to introduce themselves to other editors. Wikipedia is not a general hosting service, so your user page is not a personal homepage. Content unrelated to Wikipedia or its editing is likely to be removed. Please see the user page guidelines, especially this section for more information.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000012
0.000059
It should be mentioned that she was terrible on SNL.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.00001
you are also trolling by pasting in nonsense about Daniel Dunglas Home, that has nothing to do with Radin or this article.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000153
0.000012
" I am reverting the page because you do not provide sufficient justification for your very questionable changes, which are obviously not neutral POV (e.g., you changed ""annexation"" to ""liberation,"" ""russified"" to ""delatvianized,"" etc.). That terrible things happened all over the USSR is no reason to remove specific information on how the region was ethnically cleansed and its original inhabitants (of whatever ethnicity) in large part replaced by others. "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000014
0.000041
:Not even every sexual person fantasizes while masturbating (most males do, but many females do not). I think most libidinous asexuals masturbate for the same reason they would scratch themselves if they were itchy.
1true
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.006392
0.00004
Nazi mysticism and [[vrill[[ should contain all the info and leads you need. ''''''''''
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.001473
0.00156
" :When the DOE ""Admits"" that the PAA is a ""Subsidy"" - it is agreeing with its critics - so a cite in which the object of criticism admits the truth of those criticism is pretty damning evidence in my book - your mileage may vary, but if you're a reporter you really should know this - On the other hand, when the object of investigation is papering over the real issue by saying - ""well it ensures compensation"" - when exactly what it doesn't do is ensure compensation by f*reaking removing the standard obligation to get yourself properly insured - is blantant propoganda."
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00033
0.000066
", 6 March 2010 (UTC) ::Done. Had to juggle one of the images left-to-right. Anyway, I was referring to the persondata and Categorization, they're usually at the very bottom of an article. I had commented them out so that they wouldn't be used for my draft page; they are meant for articlepace only. '''''' 20:46"
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000011
0.000014
" ==THP Arb== * After looking through the Arbitration policies, it appears that you can simply add yourself to the Arbitration Request as another ""involved party"", at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration. In this manner, you can then make a Statement, and participate in the evidence sections of the arbitration. "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.00001
:If you are going to stoop to ridiculous personal attacks about 'lining my pockets' you can go away. Oh, unless you mean who pays me, read my user page, you can see where I am employed....
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.322891
0.001113
You're the author of [exploding whale]! D
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.00001
== Raster conversion to SVG == Hello, Thanks for converting the OFTC college logo to SVG. If you're still in the raster convertin' mood (as it were), I have also been uploading images for other Technical Colleges in Georgia as a personal project to create useful Wiki pages for them. All of the logos on the following pages fall into that category: *Albany Technical College *Altamaha Technical College *Atlanta Technical College *Middle Georgia Technical College *Central Georgia Technical College *Wiregrass Georgia Technical College Just wanted to mention it... no worries if you're not interested. Thanks! -
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000021
0.000019
You can tell from Biraqleet's user page that he is a Judeophobe, so just ignore his racist nonsense.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.0047
0.016394
::::My belated regards also.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.00001
Flight 17 The article Flight 17 has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.000012
Both answers help. The Total function article doesn't seem clear about the convention. Thanks, Bill
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.00001
" ==Reverted photo question== Per your comment when your reverted my photo swap of File:AH-64D Apache Longbow 2006-7-6.JPG. You asked ""good faith, but why remove the only pic of the A in US Army for a so-so pic of a D?"". Here's my reasoning (was at the time): *The A-model photo is in a section that is exclusively talking about D-models. *The A-model photo is on an empty tarmac while the D-model photo was an in-flight combat photo *The A-model photo was oriented away from the text, the D-model photo was oriented towards the text I've moved the A-model photo up in the section, where the prose addresses the use of the A-model, and I've re-inserted the D-model photo back where it was. That bumps out File:AH-64 Apache 060224.jpg, which is a large and sharper photo, but is a head-on view and does not show the more commonly seen perspective of the aircraft in flight. I have other photos of the Longbow in flight that are higher resolution, but I will not post for OPSEC reasons. Perhaps File:AH-64 Apache 060224.jpg could go back into the article under the ""D-Model"" section, as there are no US D-Model photos, but rather two foreign (Isreal and Singapore) models. I hope you agree to this reasoning and find my adjustments reasonable and logical. I hope to work on cleaning up the article in general in the coming weeks. Also, I have a question. What would you think of using this file as an A-model photo? File:AH-64A at Fort Rucker Sep 1999.jpg. I know that the pilot (myself) figures prominently, but it is a great photo of an AH-64A, and those just don't grow on trees any more. Thanks.   "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000015
0.000033
:: Understood, but there is still no equality in this whatsoever, as it always takes two to start a war not just one. This is why this is very, very unjust and everyone is misunderstanding me.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.000014
" ==Speedy deletion of Lid of pot== A tag has been placed on Lid of pot, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a1. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.000011
" == Bernardi PROD tag == Just a quick heads up not to remove the PROD tag from the Andrew Bernardi article until the article has references. I see that you have added some names of people or organizations to the References section, but by references we actually mean independent sources (books, news articles and similar sources written about Bernardi but not written by him or anyone closely associated with him). At WP:REFB and WP:RS, you can find some good information on listing references. Thanks! "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.000011
" == In use == Hi Obi, I'm in the middle of editing at the AR article. Can you say what the tag is for? :I'm trying to complete the merge from the history article. It looked like you had stopped editing... I should be done in a hour or so. :It will confuse the merge if additional edits come in. Thanks. ::No, I haven't stopped yet. But which merge do you mean? We can't merge the histories, so I'm unsure what merge means here. :::not merge histories, but merge changes. I'm trying to merge the changes from the history article (using a 3-way merge), because edits/improvements were made since the branch in 2008. If you could just hold off it would help a great deal - I can't do the merge while someone else is editing. cheers ::::I'm right in the middle of fixing the refs; can it wait until tomorrow? Also, I don't know what you mean by merging the changes. Do you mean you want to add some text to the history section from the former history article? If so, I'm going to rewrite and re-source that entire section (the ancient world section), because the sources aren't the best available. Or have I misunderstood? :::::Yes; actually it would be easier to do now, before you make more changes. I'm trying to capture the differences from the history section, since it was written, since both versions evolved separately. It seems to stem from 2008, when it was moved to a new article; shortly thereafter, you copied the content back, but the split article remained, so the two versions evolved separated. A 3-way merge allows you to captures both sets of changes. See 3-way_merge#Three-way_merge for details. But making more changes, especially re-writes, will just confuse the merge process further. :::::::I wrote the text that was moved to the history article. The additions since then were poorly sourced (e.g. to websites) and I can see factual errors, so they shouldn't be copied over. This is an academic subject, and it has to be based on largely (if not entirely) academic sources. There are plenty available, so there's no reason not to use them. My aim is to update the article to make sure the writing is improved, the sources are the best available, and that the text and the sources agree. Also, there are a few issues that we don't cover at all, or barely allude to, so I'd like to add those too. I can't do it overnight, though, because it's a protracted job. == VN style guide? == You mention a VN style guide, that sometimes allows diacritics? If that's the case it would probably apply to all 6x of the restore Vietnamese RMs currently in. Where is this guide? Thanks. :here: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Vietnamese); however the guide itself is full of contradictions; it says categories should use diacritics, then it says they shouldn't. But it does allow for the diacritics, if there isn't an established english-language common use. Another start would be modifying/cleaning up that guide. ::Ah that, it seems to mainly be an essay... ( == FYI == No action needed on your part; I just thought you might like to know about the latest development in the Nenpog Soap Opera... Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Nenpog vs. Guy Macon, Doc James, and Yobol. Previous AN/I discussion: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive759#User:Nenpog Previous discussion on Jimbo's talk page: Previous Topic bans: Diff1gDiff2Diff3 [[User:Guy Macon|Guy Macon]
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00004
0.000071
" == Taiwan street peddlers today? == It says ""And before the 90s hawkers even wandered around the street and peddled deep-fried stinky to-fu."" They were still wandering the streets when I was there in 2002-2003, does anyone know if they still are? I just want to know if I should change this to ""Up to the early 2000's"" or just get rid of the time qualification altogether."
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00041
0.003838
== Webclent Discutuin == i think web client is lame ÷
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000046
0.002749
* bundling multiple citations: there are a couple of examples of this in the current (14 Aug 2015) article, but the precedent set early on was to not bundle citations.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000011
0.000021
" Ah, the peril of relying on Wikipedia for accurate information -) Good to see you've changed the ""Named after"" to ""Reference unknown""."
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000306
0.00001
Welcome! Hello , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: *The five pillars of Wikipedia *How to edit a page *Help pages *Tutorial *How to write a great article *Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  • • [ Reply]
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000075
0.000448
== Murder trial of George Zimmerman == WP:BOLD I know, but I think this is what will be getting most of the attention from now on.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000011
0.000892
Seconded... I came here hoping to know how to pronounce it.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.00001
Oh sorry about that i only thought my edits would only appear like that to our ip address. Damn it now im block forever. Sorry though for having ruined the pages, for a long time i didnt realize what my disruptive edits were until you pointed it out. Sorry though but if there is a way of improving pdf photos, do tell
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000011
0.001891
" ::::::::lol - context… that's got to be the funniest rationalization I've heard on this page yet. "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.00001
:::Well, to me the NBS (in addition to news releases on changes to administrative lineups since 2011) has the final say on this. GotR
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.00001
hi joe jonas how are u mybe u dont know me but i know u more then how u know me i wish u write for me ur e mail to speak to u i am a big fan of u thanks i love u v.v.v.v.v.v.v.v much and i wish i meet u
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.339986
0.938835
::Oh just found out Libstars been snitching to same admin who deleted SuperLeague - complaining about personal attacks on the PRIDE page. This place really is starting to suck. 08:27, 6 July 2011
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.353441
0.006571
:Well, if the current revision is acceptable to Wdford, I would leave it there. I don't feel like writing anything more at the moment.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.000011
It just mentions the links to be avoided, not removed. The guidelines state that dead links must never be removed, for the reasons i have mentioned above. Even though ganglandnews.com is pay-per-view, it is still of use as a convenient link to citations.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.000014
Dude, you didn't even read the article if you think it's slanted. You find it slanted because it's not slanted; that is, it doesn't portray PETA with the same propogandistic vitriol you wish it to.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.000068
I don't think this article is long enough now to need content split off. -
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.00001
Cleaned some things up. English could be westernized a bit here...
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.00001
::Would you like to write up the Hegassen scroll entry for this? We have to publish soon and still about 8 entries are unwritten, Twenty-eight Featured pictures,Four Featured lists and Fourteen Featured articles were promoted this week. That's a bit much. You MAY be funny.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000015
0.000012
"Mass rape propaganda and Holocaust denial === The source for the ""Time"" quotes is this article by Kevin Alfred Strom from 1994: * App's ""Ravishing the Women of Conquered Europe"" *: alternate version Strom says his text is based on an article by Austin J. App from April 1, 1946: * Ravishing The Women Of Conquered Europe – as published by Michael Walsh * Ravishing The Women Of Conquered Europe – as published on Geocities Austin J. App is best known as one of the fathers of Holocaust denial, see for example A Brief History of Holocaust Denial by Ben S. Austin. Another source for rape quotes, used by all four of the cited web pages, is a review of Cornelius Ryan's book The Last Battle, that appeared in Time Magazine on April 1, 1966. === "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000011
0.000015
" == My RFA == {| style=""border: 1px solid gray; background-color: lightblue;"" |rowspan=""2"" valign=""middle"" | |rowspan=""2"" | |style=""font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;"" | Thanks! |- |style=""vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;"" |, thank you for showing your support in my RFA which passed with 38 support, 0 oppose, and 0 neutral! I also want to give special thanks to my Admin Coach and nominator, for all of his help and support. I promise that I'll give my best effort as an admin, and I hope that your confidence in me proves to be justified. If I can ever be of any help, please let me know. In the mean time, I have some cleaning to do.Have a great day! / |}"
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000011
0.000019
néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger néger né
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.292338
0.371251
? I keep on telling you to give me a Wii game that does not use a Wii Optical Disk other than Virtual Console games, but all you do is just change subjects. Another thing that I keep telling you, Super Mario Galaxy, Nights: Journey of Dreams, and Metroid Prime 3 have Wii Optical Disk with no source needed. What do you have to say about THAT
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000657
0.000895
" == totally wrong == I have deleted totally the following and I will explain why here. [i]In the British-patterned universities, the Ph.D. program is much shorter because the coursework component is assigned to the masters' and bachelors' degrees, and the Ph.D. course is concerned purely with research for a thesis. The target time is nominally three years, but some students finish earlier, and many take a few years longer. The actual time depends strongly on the discipline being studied.[/i] [b]This is rubbish for the reasons already discussed - while the funding councils are moving towards a model where they want applications to apply for Masters' funding and Ph.D. funding at the same time, there is no ""assignment"" of coursework to the masters' - it's not actually a requirement to do a masters' before a Ph.D.[/b] [i]British-style bachelors' degrees do not usually require a broad liberal arts and sciences general education component and students are therefore free to concentrate solely on their chosen discipline. The bachelors' degree, if conferred with a high level of 'honours' (i.e. excellent grades), can allow admission to a Ph.D. program without having to first write a masters' thesis. This route is only possible if the university offers an 'honours year' in the field of study, though this is becoming increasingly common due to the greater funding that universities receive for enrolling doctoral students.[/i] This is complete rubbish from start to finish. I have never heard of a british university having a ""honours year"" - virtually every degree awarded now in the UK has honours attached to it. In theory you can just walk after completing all of your modules and just get (for example) a BA but in practice everyone does their final assignment/project/disseration and gets their honours. The ""honours"" bit is no indication of excellent grades - you can get a 2:2 and still graduate with a BA(Hons)! "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.0002
0.00019
...And why should it be more neutral to use 'set on fire' instead of 'burned'? Anyway, you didn't just made 'minor modifications to the article.' You deleted large parts of it, eventhough you admit that you know nothing about the topic. Why don't you (for a change) edit an article where you have at least some basic knowledge about the topic? Read the comments by the other editors here. You are wasting peoples time.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.009543
0.001506
== Toolserver replag permanent - Dab solver needs porting == Hi JaGa; My understanding is that the Toolserver replag is permanent, and that pointing people off to use Dab solver on it is not helpful. You ought to alter the message until such time as Dab solver is ported to labs.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.001289
0.001252
:La verdad es que no le veo la necesidad a que las fotografías estén tan recortadas, tanto a que no se les ve la cabeza completamente, y estoy en desacuerdo con ello.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.002029
0.001499
" == About Recusal: Justice not only needs to be, it must also appear to be done! == Homey: Regardless of the fact that you may have had good reasons, it is VERY bad form for an admin to block anyone when they are having a dispute with, when they (the admin) is involved in writing the article (besides I have never heard of a ""3 minute block"" is that meant to frighten and intimidate?) The correct thing would be to call on a one or two NEUTRAL admins, not involved with this article, and ask them for their input. If they feel that someone is overstepping the rules then they should give a warning to the person they feel is wrong and then if he disregards that warning take the needed action, by all means, as long as they can justify themselves. But you should not have acted as both advocate and editor of the article as well as the executioner admin and final arbiter. Justice not only needs to be, it must also appear to be done! And in this case it clearly was not. IZAK
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000022
0.000086
lapel, windfall, Markleville, and Westfield
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.00001
==Image:FlynnSaunders1.jpg== I have tagged Image:FlynnSaunders1.jpg as . In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.000119
:So are you saying they just suspected it might not be a rational ratio? Why did they not 'suspect' the irrationality of pi in anyway the same way then? I get the feeling there's some history revisionism at work here like I saw in another maths article a little while ago.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000014
0.00019
. You cannot simply delete article discussion because you do not like what it says, or you will be reported
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.00001
Yes indeed I've read it and it is far more accurate than any reports that emanated from the BBC or any British newspaper. I am very grateful for all the time you have devoted to finding a fair and accurate account. Best wishes,
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.00001
:::Except ships are not LAND-marks. It's like calling a Bus a landmark simply because it was involved in some historic event. Even the Spruce Goose doesn't have a NHL box. And ships are not measured by the Acre, like a plot of earth. Since they went ahead and registered the Monitor as a landmark I suppose we have to let it ride.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000027
0.000031
" == Causality? == ""Should FTL travel or communication be possible, problems with causality will almost certainly occur."" Why? "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.000034
Should this article have a little something on when, why and how Jobcentre became Jobcentre Plus?
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000012
0.00001
" Welcome Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of ''', such as the ones to the page VersaEmerge, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the ""sandbox"" rather than in articles. If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}}''' below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia. *The five pillars of Wikipedia *Help pages *Tutorial I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome!  —  / "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00003
0.000024
I can't get the stupid template to work (it seems that if it is possible to do so it's certainly not worth the effort), so I'm just reverting it. Hopefully it won't be back to 'repair' my change.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000084
0.005133
== Lagrange Operations correct ? == Are the lagrange operations correct ? I mean, 1942 - 3402 * 5 + 4414 * 4/3 doesn't goes into 1234..
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000012
0.00001
== KochFacts.com == :Undid revision 634292812 by Viriditas (talk)been discussed before - absolutely RS for this material Where has this been discussed, ? I don't see anything on this talk page, and you added the material back into this article. Perhaps you will now discuss how it meets our policies and guidelines instead of claiming it's already been discussed?
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000017
0.000032
One example of this is a used Boeing 767-200 that was purchased by the founders of Google, Sergey Brin and Larry Page, and later converted.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000016
0.000013
== New American Bible == Great job on the cover image for the New American Bible article. I suck at pics and your image is much better! Have a great holiday! - Thanks, ''''''''''
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.012581
0.002202
" Here's what an angry reader said to the ""authorized editors"": - What a stunning bunch of intellectually constipated wiki-fascists. How many centuries have humans KNOWN that we are just as susceptible and influenced by various cycles as everything else? You bunch of orifi have passed judgement on a subject much bigger than this page, your ability to discern truth from minutiae, and the purpose of Wiki. You should be ashamed of yourselves. I am disgusted with you, and shocked at the small minded turtle puppet club that edits Wikipedia. You have betrayed the idea of open information. I curse at you and spit between my fingers at your feet. "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.589745
0.000394
" ...hm...i read the term ""young up-coming professional"" in a school book. does this term exist? or is it just wrong?"
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.068417
0.000014
Just shut up and don't offend the homeland of some people - it might be awful but keep it for yourself.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.021816
0.00001
== The Value of Half Rhyme == This article doesn't mention the positive aspect or the value of half-rhyming or slant rhyming that would sometimes attract great poets including Yeats and others. Here are a few attractions of slant rhyme: First, it allows a poet to break away from what Milton complained about in rhyme, or the jingle-jangle of perfect rhymes. It allows the poet to use rhyme but with subtlety, and with the device itself being less assertive. Second, it makes available to the poet yet another tone or quality, a tone that is different, perhaps softer, and novel. Third, it offers the poet opportunities for irony and ironic humor when the rhyme makes an issue of the amount of distance it travels away from a perfect rhyme.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000036
0.000237
Bill dear sir you are gay stay over at dans you can bum
1true
0false
0false
0false
1true
1true
0.999543
0.000053
" :Actually, when the article is read in context, he is not 100% wrong, but that is neither here nor there. The fact is I am not resisting this information being put in the article at all; I am simply stating that it is not that big a deal everyone had a pre-911 mindset before 911, and the few who didn't - like Clarke, Scheuer - were seen as paranoid. The only reason Johnson's pre-911 views have been made an issue is to make a nonsensical smear against him. I am not pushing you around; I am trying to keep the article useful and relevant and free of idiotic statements and right wing propaganda. :As far as his expertise goes, please point to a single source actually questioning his expertise. Something other than innuendo based on something he wrote before 911. There is no need for personal attacks; I am not a ""bully."" If you are not trying to smear Johnson, why is it you insist on implying that he is a liar by putting qualifiers in every statement, when those statements are not contested by anyone on earth? "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.002645
0.000689
" Actually all her songs are my favorites but if i has to choose i would pick out ""Sweet Dreams"", ""Halo"", ""Freakum Dress"" and ""Crazy in Love"". • "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.000011
Yes. A list really doesn't need a page of its own. Sorry, but it wouldn't hurt to transpose this page. It would look better; more people would also look at it and remember it better.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.00001
Whats this link to American footballers category? It doesnt seem to lead to anything...
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.00001
::The Walrus is a serious magazine. It has had pieces by notable authors, including *Margaret Atwood *Edward Burtynsky *Leonard Cohen *Douglas Coupland *Pico Iyer
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000359
0.000058
== I hate you Deltaquad ==
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
1.00001
0.000023