monology/jigsaw_test_pred · Datasets at Hugging Face

comment_text stringlengths 1 5k	toxic class label 2 classes	severe_toxic class label 2 classes	obscene class label 2 classes	threat class label 2 classes	insult class label 2 classes	identity_hate class label 2 classes	prediction_hate float64 0 1	prediction_nsfw float64 0 1
== Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages == This edit has been reverted. —	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000012	0.000011
* Support per WP:PRECISE. There is no other article with this same title.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
" :::The British way? ;) "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
Per WP:RS/N, MMFA is good for factchecking, but not for notability or due weight. You can go there if you need information, but MMFA by itself is not grounds for inclusion.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000011
==Russian northernmost settlement== Pevek Russian nothernmost arctic port town. Why you forgot that too?	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000099
" Thanks for the response but I think you are underestimating the effect this has. For example, at the moment there are revert wars raging on across multiple pages because people are trying to add this category to them and others are disagreeing rather strongly. I think it is important to rememeber that CfD et al. is what we make of it - it is generally not a vote (that's why we have DRV et al.) and despite some of the uninformed people who never check back there are plenty of people like me who engage in active discussion on it and can quickly ""turn the tide of the vote"" per se. So, while I share your concern about the lack of a thoughtful discussion I believe you could have easily have had the discussion right there... \| @ \| "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000011	0.000013
== removing Cafe PHOTO == i cannot see the value of posting this cafe table Photo next to the Bibliography: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:MaharshiKaffeeklatsch.JPG How about simply removing it ? please go ahead to do so, as i will probably forget. LovingKindness, b	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000016	0.000344
, just like your sockpuppets	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
:I was just going to come here and say the same thing. He was reverting vandalism (BLP violations, actually), not edit-warring. Further, he didn't even violate 3RR, having reverted the vandal only twice. Please consider undoing this block.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000016
::your welcome.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
=IN THE NEXT HOLOCAUST, NO HOOKNOSE JEWISH DEVILS WILL SURVIVE=	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
" == Account == Why, yes you do...if i knew you were gay, i would have been nicer and you hate bush...extra bonus!! LOL "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.624676	0.018994
}} *{{cite book \| last=Giroux \| first=Henry A. \| year=2006 \| chapter=Private Satisfactions and Public Disorders: Fight Club, Patriarchy and the Politics of Masculine Violence \| editor1-last=Weaver \| editor1-first=C. Kay \| editor2-last=Carter \| editor2-first=Cynthia \| title=Critical Readings: Violence and the Media \| series=Issues in Cultural and Media Studies \| publisher=Open University Press \| isbn=978-0-335-21806-6	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000012
:: Well you bloody well will discuss or I will revert all your changes and ask for wiki intervention. Your behaviour is childish at best. Some of Jalil's edits are clearly partisan whingong , some are logical, some are debatable and deserve a convo. And I'll note from looking at your talk page, you seem to have a poor attitude combined with a poor command of English. ( )	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.026558	0.000074
One quick and dirty way to break out the numbers would be to create a danger number, which would be 100 minus the 1 to 100 integrity scale. This could be the formula: danger factor = daily volume * (100 - bridge integrity rating). So a perfect bridge with 300,000 cars a day would rate a 0. A bridge with a 75 integrity rating and 10,000 cars would get a 2,500 score, and the I-35W bridge, with 141,000 vehicles per day and a 50 integrityh rating would get a danger score of 70,500. I'm sure the I-35W bridge would nearly top this list that accounts for vehicle volume and structural integrity.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.002295	0.000023
" == Photo == I was digging, and found a better photo of him in the Wikimedia Commons, ""File:Austria vs. USA 2013-11-19 (145).jpg"" so I think it's a better one to use. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000011
"::::That is, quite frankly, bizarre. Corrie says ""A,"" CJ says ""Corrie says 'A' and here's her diary entry where she says it,"" you say ""the article about CJ's blog must state 'CJ claims that Corrie says ""A"",' because another Wikipedia page about Corrie doesn't include anything about her saying 'A'?"" ::::The contortions necessary to arrive at that position must be quite painful. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000012	0.000751
::Made a start on a ce, rm press reports as they would be better in an article on contemporary publicity.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
" == ""Mutual funds are regulated by the SEC, while hedge funds are not""/regulation in general == This is simply wrong. Investment Advisers (the managers of hedge funds) in the US are governed by the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. There are many aspects of the Act that apply both to registered and unregistered advisers. The most important of these provisions are anti-fraud measures. The SEC enforces the Act. Registered IAs can count on a visit from the SEC on a schedule determined by the adviser/fund's perceived riskiness. To try and draw some kind of distinction between an adviser being regulated and a fund being regulated is pointless: when the SEC visits, they are empowered to review all aspects of an adviser's funds. The SEC can use Rule 206(4)-8 under the Act to come in and look at an unregistered adviser's funds, as well. More, it is ludicrous to state that hedge funds are ""largely unregulated,"" although this phrase is repeated in the popular press frequently. In the US, hedge funds may be regulated by the SEC, CFTC, FINRA, various SROs and exchanges, state securities regulators, the Department of Labor and maybe others. In addition to the Act, hedge funds are regulated under the Investment Company Act (for exclusion from the definition of an Investment Company) and the Securities Act of 1933 (Regulation D concerning sales of private securities). Any trading by direct investment hedge funds is subject to all the rules of FINRA and the exchanges. If anything, regulation in the UK is even stricter. Solid regimes exist in other jurisdictions, including Cayman and Bermuda. In short, it is the case in the US and the UK, among other major venues, that hedge funds are (highly) regulated pools of capital. I will propose changes to the article as time permits. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000026	0.000195
== Sneaky vandalism == An anonymous editor/s has made several attempts to introduce incorrect data to this article, in particular on Macedonian-related stats. Most recent example here (I checked the source for country of birth and confirmed that the new figures are wrong). Other editors, please keep an eye on changes here...	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000015
these guys are a bunch of assholes	1true	0false	1true	0false	1true	0false	1.00001	1.00001
:::Probably better just to state that Sea Viper is not yet fully operational - who knows whether the ships have got Aster missiles on board yet, and how would we know when that changes?	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000011	0.00001
==March 2013==	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
f..k you spanish idiot - RULE BRITANNIA	1true	0false	1true	0false	1true	0false	1.00001	0.002681
:What websites are those? If they fall under reliable sources, then we can cite them.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
Maybe we could put a footnote, mentioning the fact about Brooklyn? With the first graph, we could also use a cross-hatch or some fill pattern. - ( \| )	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000032
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaabbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbcccccccccccccccccccccccccdddddddddddddddddddddddddeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeffffffffffffffffffgggggggggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiijjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkklllllllllllllllllllllllmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnooooooooooooooooooooppppppppppppppppppppqjko8k huwu3u 33333333333efwwwwwwiop56 33fvg	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
this is so dumb you could go suck a dickTalk	1true	0false	1true	0false	1true	0false	1.00001	0.999934
==Quinine/quinidine== So it's implied in this article that quinidine is also an antimalarial. Is quinine also an antiarrhythmic?	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
== Dumb == They #2 on their friends	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000864	0.000045
{unblock\|FUCKING UNBLOCK ME OR ILL FUCKING BAN YOU BANHAMMER BITCH!!!}	1true	0false	1true	0false	1true	0false	1.00001	1.00001
==PROD Removed, Improving Article== I've removed the prod template from this page. Macteens is notable on the Mac-web, and I will improve this article so it better fits the needs of Wikipedia website poicy. However, criteria has already been met for this article, so it should stand on its own. With that, criteria used for its proposed deletion (Alexa) is ineffecitve, as it only samples Windows MSIE users, which is highly problematic for a site that targets teenage Mac users. Macteens is notable enough to be admitted into industry events as media, so it should be notable enough for an entry into Wikipedia. As I said earlier, I'll be working on this article.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000011	0.000016
LOL uncle Dick needs no harassment because hes got a name that reminds of the male reproductive organ.	1true	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.023033	0.033544
" ::I put the {{In use}} template on the article, but that is not meant for you. Go ahead and fill in the infobox. Best, '' "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000011
\|listas = Barthelmes, Brian	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
please refrain from undoing the article without prior discussion. we are maintaining neutral stand. if you persist i would have to report you.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.002543	0.000034
== This man is scum == He has done more to hurt Northern Ireland then almost anybody else, he should of been dead years ago.	1true	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.095077	0.38171
: The article states pretty clearly that the 67.9% figure is calculated for the effective strength of the regiment after both July 2 and Pickett's Charge.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
I put it to you, if Zara1709 was a German nationalist, wouldn't he obsess over German topics the same way you obsess over Indian topics? Beware.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.001864	0.000568
" :This page is not about ""Scottish Arms"". It is about UK Arms. I oppose a merger with the Royal arms of Scotland page, which is about a different topic. ""Some random German site"" should perhaps have been left off your list of authoritative sources. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00002
== Red Wings Season pages == Hey, I just joined the Hockey Project and was wondering if you could use some assistance with the Wings' season pages. Let me know what era you're working on so we don't end up stepping on each others edits. thanks!	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000012
Hi Nawlin, The page for Bam Barcena that I was editing was deleted for not having enough secondary sources. I was in the process of finding more references for the wiki page and was wondering if there was a way to have the page back up again? If not, is there any way to retrieve the information? Thanks!	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000011
" ==Sources== One of the problems is that there are still large numbers of sources from the early period of the case, though the reporting is now seen as faulty at best, and at worst was part of the character assassination that led to the wrongful convictions. This is like sourcing an article about the Guildford Four to articles from the 1970s. I think we should begin the process of replacing older sources with more current, high-quality ones, except where the older articles are being used as primary sources to discuss media reaction. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000014
:I'd be more willing to bet that the population bomb apocalypse will happen first. But thank you for your concern.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
:::At least starting June I see no consensus having developed to mention Ayers at all. That was the period of endless polling and article protection, followed by a stable period after that with less frequent attempts to introduce it. It is hard to draw conclusions from February through May given the tendentiousness at the time and all the page protections and sockpuppets. Before February the issue wasn't around. *The proposal sounds interesting to find a neutral third party to resolve this issue once and for all, but I have a couple concerns and issues with that. First, I am not sure there is a dispute to resolve. The matter has been resolved and the decision is to not include Bill Ayers material to the article. That a small vocal group repeatedly brings this up does not make it a real dispute. If they continue to oppose a uniform consensus then dispute resolution becomes forum shopping. Second, what process is there for article arbitration? I see none listed at WP:DISPUTE. Maybe I'm missing something but offhand I am not aware of arbitration being an option here.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000011	0.000014
christmas is assosiated with evel	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
Bold textWhen did Samuel Slater die?	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.466509	0.00001
" :never mind I filed a checkuser request. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
" == Chennai == Tell, for what reasons you gotta edit Chennai Wiki page? If you mention that ""subjective surveys don't go int he lead"", then you better edit the Mumbai page, you maharashtrian scumbag. I really donna why you guys can't face the truth? Is it hard to swallow the truth? Crooked narrow minded idiots can never rise high. -Inferno"	1true	0false	1true	0false	1true	0false	0.961625	0.5299
:Except that there isn't a widespread agreement that the name is a BLP issue.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000019
. Nëse je, mos mban mendjen me atë që thonë	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
==Category:Venezuelans in the United States== :Category:Venezuelans in the United States, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000011
When someone is both head of govt and head of state, shouldn't they be in both lists? Nancy Pelosi is not listed here, so if Hillary Clinton is elected pres, she would be, correct? —	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000011
== Islam in Ireland == Why should Muslims stay out of Ireland? Are you afraid they'll have children who might emigrate to the States and you'll go crazy because you don't want two Muhammads on the Irish-American list?	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.232337	0.000947
Uhoris metrshy ohra	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
" An example is California Proposition 23 (2010).[29] *Zernike, Kate (February 27, 2010). ""Unlikely Activist Who Got to the Tea Party Early"". New York Times I don't think the source supports the statement. It might be worthwhile listing TPM-endorsed propositions, if any, in the election section. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000011	0.000018
From: Lord George Allen Reeve, Beaumont, Texas To: Concierge, New York City, New York Subj: INDUSTRY AND TRADE 1. It is requested that the following corporations upgrade their processes immediately. a. Dupont b. British Petroleum c. Chevron d. Amaco 2. Any orders that cannot be filled by these companies may be processed through Exxon Mobil Corporation in Beaumont, and Port Arthur as part of our Joint Venture. Sincerely, GEORGE ALLEN REEVE A Son of England	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000323	0.000036
Hi Fly. The best way to contact me is on my talk page (it's linked in the history for each article I've edited). I do not normally check other users' talk pages for messages addressed to me. I deleted the information because it was based on what I believed to be an unreliable source. It has since been re-added using a source from the Variety website. Also, it is acceptable to cite the credits of the film itself for such information, if you happen to have access to a copy. :On another note: Do you happen to have a photograph of McColl that you own the copyright to (that is, that you took yourself) and that you wouldn't mind uploading to Wikipedia? If so, that would be an excellent addition to the article. It would be a good idea to get his permission before uploading it, though I do not think that is technically required. Thanks.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00003	0.000026
" PS. If one scrolls down here: http://www.discogs.com/master/view/79021 to ""other version"" one will find 42 different pressings of the soundtrack, most of them including photos of discs and track listing. I have browsed through most of them and have yet to find one that agrees the apodictic statement of Mark Miller who thinks he knows better than the record. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000012
" ::not at all, microevolution can only do more of the same, create sub-species like all Darwin's finches, and then natural selection is conservative and not innovative it only select the subspecie fit to a specific environnement, in macroevolution a minute mutation of a homeogene will alter the ontogenese in it's whole creating new specie or even a new genus ""in a full-blown and viable state"" or end with an extinction , so you have not to search for missing links and the hyatus in the fossil record are no more a problem. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000017	0.000291
" :We have Ethnicities in Iran, Demographics of Iran, Iranians, and Iranian peoples. You say people use ""Persian"" instead of ""Iranian""? Maybe this article needs some clarification. Historical usage of ""Persian"" and modern ethno-linguistic usage of ""Persian"" or usage of ""Persian"" as an ethnicity. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000011	0.000094
==Lardil kinship table is unclear== It's not clear how to complete the kinship table for the Lardil. If you pair the lines into father/son pairs going down the table, you get matricycles of length 2, not 4 (as stated below the table). Switching lines 4 and 5 of the table would fix this, but I have no idea if that is the correct fix. Does anybody know?	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000024	0.000012
:Sorry, I masked it for better prose flow: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Why Rummel is always right.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
Water fluoridation was developed by the Nazis for use in concentration camps to keep prisoners docile. It was brought to the US in the late 1940s under Operation Paperclip. This conspiracy is just the tip of the ice berg. Your government employs tens of thousands of people to obfuscate the evidence. Pathetic sheep lap up the spoon fed propaganda.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000047	0.000055
== Protected edit request on 14 December 2014 == The film has a positive reception and has made 60 crores first day	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
Of-course. Is your 'Wikimood' getting better yet? (Its almost 3am here Shijt) ♥	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00003	0.000036
" == Minor edits == Thanks for your work on Variable Geo. I noticed this edit which was marked as a minor edit. Please use the ""minor"" checkbox only for changes which do not modify the informational content of an article. Examples would be additions of wikilinks, spelling corrections, etc. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
== یارمەتی == سڵاو خۆشەویست. دەتوانی لێرەدا یارمەتیمان بدەی و ھەروەھا بیروڕای خۆشت بنووسی. زۆر سپاس.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000012	0.000202
I believe other publications also carried this story, but are less neutral and reliable than Campbell's articles. These are a little more than Op-Ed pieces. Campbell gives his credentials and provides supporting details in his PC-Pro article, including the exact name of the website Townshend accessed through Landslide. It's unfortunate that this case does reflect on the police handling of the investigation. However, it does seem to have gone wrong right from the beginning when the list of names was leaked from the police department to the press. Once it's become a public issue, then everyone has lost control. It would have been much better handled discreetly.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000014	0.000037
The Japanese out scammed the Chinese with their Tokyo Sky Tower and it's enormous spire.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
" :::::Halsall's article is 20 pages long (pp. 35-55). So there is a lot more to it than the two-page PDF. He may complain about the term ""Barbarian Invasions,"" but it's the one he uses. As for Delbrück, I think its significant that the main current translation uses ""Barbarian Invasions."" After all, we want to follow English usage and not German. Even while Britannica's ""ancient Rome"" article uses ""Barbarian Invasions,"" their ""Germany"" article uses ""Migration Period."" So it's primarily a question of whether you're viewing events through the Roman or German end of the telescope. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000012	0.000023
::Thanks for that I could see that on your cleanup edit - cheers!	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
, 13 July 2007 (UTC) ::::::::::::Yep. The killa bees. 15:34	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
UPOOP POOP POOP IT MEANS TO POOP COURT POOPS IN HER PANTS	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000029
" :Please note that it says ""16th note triplets"", not ""16th notes"". 16th note triplets at 180 bpm means 18 notes per second - while 16th notes at 220 bpm is ""only "" about 14.67 notes per second. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
", 16 January 2015 (UTC) ::Well, I didn't say it should be, only that if it's 100% duplicative it should be. If it ain't, a merger and/or renaming might be appropriate, I don't have an opinion. 14:30"	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000017
" ::Because all maps are copyrighted unless they are specifically released as otherwise. And how do you mean old, it was created post WW2. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000013
:Appearances may be deceptive. I did continue to make some edits on the page, but they were not reverts of anything the other editor did. They were edits in good faith. For instance, I removed an OR section which I myself wrote. This is how I know it is OR. So that removal was not a revert. Cheers.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000019
::::::It must be hard for you. You know, being braindead.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000789	0.001898
== Came up with the right dough? Bigger dick? I don't know, must have been the best flow. == I will never reveal the Wu Tang secret.	1true	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000132	0.048384
:::Khurram, I have removed your personal attack. Please restrain yourself in the future.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000011
And as it turns out, those racist thoughts were well based, just read the article.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000824	0.00001
As the founder and CEO of WikiExperts I am happy to state clearly that, if WikiExperts is again able to edit Wikipedia, we agree to follow all COI Guidelines to the letter for every edit we make moving forward. That includes disclosure of any account used to make an edit from that point forward, as per the condition set within the original ban regarding the condition for unbanning. Disclosure will take place in full adherence to the COI Guidelines. Prior to the ban it was our opinion that it was unclear whether or not COI disclosure was mandatory, and if it had been made known to us that it was mandatory and not an issue for debate, we would never have made previous edits contrary to the guidelines. Now that we know disclosure is mandatory, we have altered our practices to adhere to the new set of rules. I have reviewed the above proposals for how new forms of COI declarations could occur, and state here that WikiExperts is fully willing to work directly with the Community to develop a system of declarations that makes the Community comfortable and provides an additional level of neutral scrutiny for all our contributions. We will not be posting, and have not posted in the past, anything that is/was not meant to help develop a more accurate and better Wikipedia, and we are comfortable working with the Community to prove our work can be beneficial to Wikipedia. Because of previously signed NDAs, we have no ability to reveal the past clients, however, we pledge to no longer sign agreements that would disallow us from full COI disclosure, so that all future work can be verified as within Wikipedia policies and guidelines. The Ethics page on our website already states as such, and past references to confidentiality of the service have been removed. We would very much like to prove that we are not harmful to Wikipedia, and to show that we add neither promotional nor non-notable material to the website when allowed to edit. , can you or somebody else please add this to the AN thread found here Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Exact_wording_people_are_supporting.3F as a response to the question posed by User:Hobit?	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000012	0.000065
" ==Just wondering, should it be split?== Wikipedia recommends it at 35 KB and this is many, many times longer. · · · "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000015	0.000011
== May 2008== Please stop your disruptive editing. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. At this rate, your reign of retarded jokes will be over soon.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.203541	0.000012
(undent) The point is Tyrus there's a whol page for stuff like that; accomplishments, records, achievements, highest scoring average for a DPOY etc, etc.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000084
" ::Oh, and one more observationBernadette is wonderfully silly and goofy, and more than a little ""over-the-top"", but in recent performances (most especially Follies) she is quite subtle and nuancedperhaps reflecting the role, perhaps the woman. But, always emotionally raw and vulnerable. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000652	0.000012
" *Specifically, Charles Price was also convicted of breaching Rosenbaum's civil rights in 2002, and New York City paid $1.25 million in compensation to Rosenbaum's family in 2005 for negligence at the hospital he was taken to:. None of that can be covered in an article about Nelson. & "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
"Oppose My view may be a little coloured by the fact that I say ""Our Father which art in heaven"" myself, but this is still by far the longest-lasting text. Once we change it to a supposedly ""modern English"" version, there will never be agreement on which one to use. Indeed, the argument already rages over whether to say ""Our Father"", ""Our Parent"" or ""Our Father-Mother"". Better not to go there. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000023	0.00008
== AUTARCH ANSWER THE ALLEGATIONS THAT YOU ARE A VANDAL == This is a message to Autarch who is leading a gang acting likea bunch of vigilantes. Autarch, stop playing the victim. You have been called to explain yourself and your actions. That is not a personal attack. You have acted in a bias manner and with malice. Again that is not a personal attack but a statement of fact. Answer the question. It is simple. I will ask it again. Why did you remove the statement that Foster was an international playboy when it was a direct quote from the most authorative voice in Australia, the ABC, i.e. the equivalent of the BBC here. Answer why, as an editor, you felt that was not relevant, given the public perception of him as an international playboy is that he used many women to promote his products and himself. Autarch, I am not attacking you as a person, but your actions which are VANDALISM. Now, you can answer my criticism by simply explaining WHY you removed the playboy tag. Nothing else. Don't run and hide. Don't deflect. Answer the question. I find your actions(again not a personal attack, just an observation of your actions) in spending hours late at night altering this mans profile so it can look as bad as possible, and deleting the good points both disturbing and worrying. I think you are a vandal. I also think you harbour a perdon vendetta against Mr Foster. I ask you again - have you ever met him? Answer that question. And, yes, stop being such a coward and answer the allegations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.211.78.219 (talk)	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.079201	0.003046
== The Rev == Fuck You Buddy ) Mind ur own damn business. Have a good one. ∞∞∞∞	1true	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	1.00001	1.00001
" == Please help - inclusionism is ""absurb"" now == Sorry to bother you, but as an Inclusionist wikipedia things are getting desperate and I need to appeal to your for help. We are facing a situation where a deletionist admin is free to declare inclusionist arguments ""absurd"" and ignore them at will. If you don't agree with this situation, please share your opinion here. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.000014
== Hot Plug Footnote == The standard footnote tag is not functioning properly with symbols. -	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
" :I sensed I had seen you before around there. Yeah that's a good plan (already showing good instincts re: admin criteria); I want dibs on your nomination! ""D Photo on the main page, that's kick ass! Be sure to screen cap that action. See you when I see ya. - "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000011	0.000048
I'm a blonde girl and I need proof that blonde girls like Jewish men. I am always harasssed by Jews but I don't find them very attractive. There is one article saying that blondes like Jews but it's written by a horny Jew, http://72.14.207.104/search?q=cache:6m3MU9VPFDkJ:www.gnn.tv/jump.php%3Fid%3DF01968+%22hot+waspy+women%22&hl;=en	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000022	0.000117
:Unless he declares this openly, stating that on this page would amount to libel. \|	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000049	0.000021
::: Thanks a lot for fixing this up!	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.00001	0.00001
" :::The blog link was in the Wikipedia:External links section; thus the verifiability policy is not particularly relevant. From the external links policy, ""Sites with other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article, such as textbooks or reviews."" Also, ""Linking to copyrighted works is usually not a problem"". :::From what I've read, the Huaorani were one of the most violent people groups on earth. Life expectancy below 30 due to inter-clan revenge killings, and killings of anyone entering their territory. Am I wrong? That to me is ""violent"". Remember that that is the lead of the article and thus everything must be summarized; soon I'm going to add a paragraph explicitly sourced that talks about their history. :::To me, ""proselytise"" has a negative connotation. I don't really see the problem with ""hope to present Christianity""—it's not like the Huaorani were being force-fed the stuff; the foreigners had a specific mission and goal but we're not talking about Spanish invaders killing the Indians if they don't convert. :::It's bad formatting to describe a reference in the references section (it is never done in FAs, for example); I eliminated the text for a reason. I thought the comment was aimed at me, and noting it, I deleted the text. Once texts are included that are anti-missionary and are cited in the article text, it will be obvious which sources are anti-missionary (Thy Will Be Done, Fishers of Men or Founders of Empire, etc.), and which aren't. :::I was hoping to continue with the narrative, but this Friday probably I'll start working on an Aftermath section, including a discussion of what different anthropologists think about all this. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000016	0.000145
" If you think you can support any of the statements made by porn stars (or their representatives) about the size of their penises, you need to get out more. This is precisely why I requested a citation; you can't just go around saying that something is ""widely recognized"" without saying who ""recognizes"" it. Typical of men who like porn a little too much, you're letting the wrong head do the thinking."	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.225402	0.000055
":Enough with the meaningless word games already, its really a stupid way to prove any point. We are talking about a person who was de facto not a King of Croatia, and was de jure a pretender to a throne held by Peter II of Yugoslavia. I'm getting seriously tired of repeating myself. To keep it simple, please answer me this: how can both Peter II and the Duke of Spoleto occupy the same throne at the same time, without one being identified as a pretender. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0.000187	0.000016

== Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages == This edit has been reverted. —

0false

0.000012

0.000011

* Support per WP:PRECISE. There is no other article with this same title.

0false

0.00001

" :::The British way? ;) "

0false

0.00001

Per WP:RS/N, MMFA is good for factchecking, but not for notability or due weight. You can go there if you need information, but MMFA by itself is not grounds for inclusion.

0false

0.00001

0.000011

==Russian northernmost settlement== Pevek Russian nothernmost arctic port town. Why you forgot that too?

0false

0.00001

0.000099

" Thanks for the response but I think you are underestimating the effect this has. For example, at the moment there are revert wars raging on across multiple pages because people are trying to add this category to them and others are disagreeing rather strongly. I think it is important to rememeber that CfD et al. is what we make of it - it is generally not a vote (that's why we have DRV et al.) and despite some of the uninformed people who never check back there are plenty of people like me who engage in active discussion on it and can quickly ""turn the tide of the vote"" per se. So, while I share your concern about the lack of a thoughtful discussion I believe you could have easily have had the discussion right there... | @ | "

0false

0.000011

0.000013

== removing Cafe PHOTO == i cannot see the value of posting this cafe table Photo next to the Bibliography: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:MaharshiKaffeeklatsch.JPG How about simply removing it ? please go ahead to do so, as i will probably forget. LovingKindness, b

0false

0.000016

0.000344

, just like your sockpuppets

0false

0.00001

:I was just going to come here and say the same thing. He was reverting vandalism (BLP violations, actually), not edit-warring. Further, he didn't even violate 3RR, having reverted the vandal only twice. Please consider undoing this block.

0false

0.00001

0.000016

::your welcome.

0false

0.00001

=IN THE NEXT HOLOCAUST, NO HOOKNOSE JEWISH DEVILS WILL SURVIVE=

0false

0.00001

" == Account == Why, yes you do...if i knew you were gay, i would have been nicer and you hate bush...extra bonus!! LOL "

0false

0.624676

0.018994

}} *{{cite book | last=Giroux | first=Henry A. | year=2006 | chapter=Private Satisfactions and Public Disorders: Fight Club, Patriarchy and the Politics of Masculine Violence | editor1-last=Weaver | editor1-first=C. Kay | editor2-last=Carter | editor2-first=Cynthia | title=Critical Readings: Violence and the Media | series=Issues in Cultural and Media Studies | publisher=Open University Press | isbn=978-0-335-21806-6

0false

0.00001

0.000012

:: Well you bloody well will discuss or I will revert all your changes and ask for wiki intervention. Your behaviour is childish at best. Some of Jalil's edits are clearly partisan whingong , some are logical, some are debatable and deserve a convo. And I'll note from looking at your talk page, you seem to have a poor attitude combined with a poor command of English. ( )

0false

0.026558

0.000074

One quick and dirty way to break out the numbers would be to create a danger number, which would be 100 minus the 1 to 100 integrity scale. This could be the formula: danger factor = daily volume * (100 - bridge integrity rating). So a perfect bridge with 300,000 cars a day would rate a 0. A bridge with a 75 integrity rating and 10,000 cars would get a 2,500 score, and the I-35W bridge, with 141,000 vehicles per day and a 50 integrityh rating would get a danger score of 70,500. I'm sure the I-35W bridge would nearly top this list that accounts for vehicle volume and structural integrity.

0false

0.002295

0.000023

" == Photo == I was digging, and found a better photo of him in the Wikimedia Commons, ""File:Austria vs. USA 2013-11-19 (145).jpg"" so I think it's a better one to use. "

0false

0.00001

0.000011

"::::That is, quite frankly, bizarre. Corrie says ""A,"" CJ says ""Corrie says 'A' and here's her diary entry where she says it,"" you say ""the article about CJ's blog must state 'CJ claims that Corrie says ""A"",' because another Wikipedia page about Corrie doesn't include anything about her saying 'A'?"" ::::The contortions necessary to arrive at that position must be quite painful. "

0false

0.000012

0.000751

::Made a start on a ce, rm press reports as they would be better in an article on contemporary publicity.

0false

0.00001

" == ""Mutual funds are regulated by the SEC, while hedge funds are not""/regulation in general == This is simply wrong. Investment Advisers (the managers of hedge funds) in the US are governed by the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. There are many aspects of the Act that apply both to registered and unregistered advisers. The most important of these provisions are anti-fraud measures. The SEC enforces the Act. Registered IAs can count on a visit from the SEC on a schedule determined by the adviser/fund's perceived riskiness. To try and draw some kind of distinction between an adviser being regulated and a fund being regulated is pointless: when the SEC visits, they are empowered to review all aspects of an adviser's funds. The SEC can use Rule 206(4)-8 under the Act to come in and look at an unregistered adviser's funds, as well. More, it is ludicrous to state that hedge funds are ""largely unregulated,"" although this phrase is repeated in the popular press frequently. In the US, hedge funds may be regulated by the SEC, CFTC, FINRA, various SROs and exchanges, state securities regulators, the Department of Labor and maybe others. In addition to the Act, hedge funds are regulated under the Investment Company Act (for exclusion from the definition of an Investment Company) and the Securities Act of 1933 (Regulation D concerning sales of private securities). Any trading by direct investment hedge funds is subject to all the rules of FINRA and the exchanges. If anything, regulation in the UK is even stricter. Solid regimes exist in other jurisdictions, including Cayman and Bermuda. In short, it is the case in the US and the UK, among other major venues, that hedge funds are (highly) regulated pools of capital. I will propose changes to the article as time permits. "

0false

0.000026

0.000195

== Sneaky vandalism == An anonymous editor/s has made several attempts to introduce incorrect data to this article, in particular on Macedonian-related stats. Most recent example here (I checked the source for country of birth and confirmed that the new figures are wrong). Other editors, please keep an eye on changes here...

0false

0.00001

0.000015

these guys are a bunch of assholes

1true

0false

1true

0false

1true

0false

1.00001

:::Probably better just to state that Sea Viper is not yet fully operational - who knows whether the ships have got Aster missiles on board yet, and how would we know when that changes?

0false

0.000011

0.00001

==March 2013==

0false

0.00001

f..k you spanish idiot - RULE BRITANNIA

1true

0false

1true

0false

1true

0false

1.00001

0.002681

:What websites are those? If they fall under reliable sources, then we can cite them.

0false

0.00001

Maybe we could put a footnote, mentioning the fact about Brooklyn? With the first graph, we could also use a cross-hatch or some fill pattern. - ( | )

0false

0.00001

0.000032

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaabbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbcccccccccccccccccccccccccdddddddddddddddddddddddddeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeffffffffffffffffffgggggggggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiijjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkklllllllllllllllllllllllmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnooooooooooooooooooooppppppppppppppppppppqjko8k huwu3u 33333333333efwwwwwwiop56 33fvg

0false

0.00001

this is so dumb you could go suck a dickTalk

1true

0false

1true

0false

1true

0false

1.00001

0.999934

==Quinine/quinidine== So it's implied in this article that quinidine is also an antimalarial. Is quinine also an antiarrhythmic?

0false

0.00001

== Dumb == They #2 on their friends

0false

0.000864

0.000045

{unblock|FUCKING UNBLOCK ME OR ILL FUCKING BAN YOU BANHAMMER BITCH!!!}

1true

0false

1true

0false

1true

0false

1.00001

==PROD Removed, Improving Article== I've removed the prod template from this page. Macteens is notable on the Mac-web, and I will improve this article so it better fits the needs of Wikipedia website poicy. However, criteria has already been met for this article, so it should stand on its own. With that, criteria used for its proposed deletion (Alexa) is ineffecitve, as it only samples Windows MSIE users, which is highly problematic for a site that targets teenage Mac users. Macteens is notable enough to be admitted into industry events as media, so it should be notable enough for an entry into Wikipedia. As I said earlier, I'll be working on this article.

0false

0.000011

0.000016

LOL uncle Dick needs no harassment because hes got a name that reminds of the male reproductive organ.

1true

0false

0.023033

0.033544

" ::I put the {{In use}} template on the article, but that is not meant for you. Go ahead and fill in the infobox. Best, '' "

0false

0.00001

0.000011

|listas = Barthelmes, Brian

0false

0.00001

please refrain from undoing the article without prior discussion. we are maintaining neutral stand. if you persist i would have to report you.

0false

0.002543

0.000034

== This man is scum == He has done more to hurt Northern Ireland then almost anybody else, he should of been dead years ago.

1true

0false

0.095077

0.38171

: The article states pretty clearly that the 67.9% figure is calculated for the effective strength of the regiment after both July 2 and Pickett's Charge.

0false

0.00001

I put it to you, if Zara1709 was a German nationalist, wouldn't he obsess over German topics the same way you obsess over Indian topics? Beware.

0false

0.001864

0.000568

" :This page is not about ""Scottish Arms"". It is about UK Arms. I oppose a merger with the Royal arms of Scotland page, which is about a different topic. ""Some random German site"" should perhaps have been left off your list of authoritative sources. "

0false

0.00001

0.00002

== Red Wings Season pages == Hey, I just joined the Hockey Project and was wondering if you could use some assistance with the Wings' season pages. Let me know what era you're working on so we don't end up stepping on each others edits. thanks!

0false

0.00001

0.000012

Hi Nawlin, The page for Bam Barcena that I was editing was deleted for not having enough secondary sources. I was in the process of finding more references for the wiki page and was wondering if there was a way to have the page back up again? If not, is there any way to retrieve the information? Thanks!

0false

0.00001

0.000011

" ==Sources== One of the problems is that there are still large numbers of sources from the early period of the case, though the reporting is now seen as faulty at best, and at worst was part of the character assassination that led to the wrongful convictions. This is like sourcing an article about the Guildford Four to articles from the 1970s. I think we should begin the process of replacing older sources with more current, high-quality ones, except where the older articles are being used as primary sources to discuss media reaction. "

0false

0.00001

0.000014

:I'd be more willing to bet that the population bomb apocalypse will happen first. But thank you for your concern.

0false

0.00001

:::At least starting June I see no consensus having developed to mention Ayers at all. That was the period of endless polling and article protection, followed by a stable period after that with less frequent attempts to introduce it. It is hard to draw conclusions from February through May given the tendentiousness at the time and all the page protections and sockpuppets. Before February the issue wasn't around. *The proposal sounds interesting to find a neutral third party to resolve this issue once and for all, but I have a couple concerns and issues with that. First, I am not sure there is a dispute to resolve. The matter has been resolved and the decision is to not include Bill Ayers material to the article. That a small vocal group repeatedly brings this up does not make it a real dispute. If they continue to oppose a uniform consensus then dispute resolution becomes forum shopping. Second, what process is there for article arbitration? I see none listed at WP:DISPUTE. Maybe I'm missing something but offhand I am not aware of arbitration being an option here.

0false

0.000011

0.000014

christmas is assosiated with evel

0false

0.00001

Bold textWhen did Samuel Slater die?

0false

0.466509

0.00001

" :never mind I filed a checkuser request. "

0false

0.00001

" == Chennai == Tell, for what reasons you gotta edit Chennai Wiki page? If you mention that ""subjective surveys don't go int he lead"", then you better edit the Mumbai page, you maharashtrian scumbag. I really donna why you guys can't face the truth? Is it hard to swallow the truth? Crooked narrow minded idiots can never rise high. -Inferno"

1true

0false

1true

0false

1true

0false

0.961625

0.5299

:Except that there isn't a widespread agreement that the name is a BLP issue.

0false

0.00001

0.000019

. Nëse je, mos mban mendjen me atë që thonë

0false

0.00001

==Category:Venezuelans in the United States== :Category:Venezuelans in the United States, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.

0false

0.00001

0.000011

When someone is both head of govt and head of state, shouldn't they be in both lists? Nancy Pelosi is not listed here, so if Hillary Clinton is elected pres, she would be, correct? —

0false

0.00001

0.000011

== Islam in Ireland == Why should Muslims stay out of Ireland? Are you afraid they'll have children who might emigrate to the States and you'll go crazy because you don't want two Muhammads on the Irish-American list?

0false

0.232337

0.000947

Uhoris metrshy ohra

0false

0.00001

" *An example is California Proposition 23 (2010).[29] **Zernike, Kate (February 27, 2010). ""Unlikely Activist Who Got to the Tea Party Early"". New York Times I don't think the source supports the statement. It might be worthwhile listing TPM-endorsed propositions, if any, in the election section. "

0false

0.000011

0.000018

From: Lord George Allen Reeve, Beaumont, Texas To: Concierge, New York City, New York Subj: INDUSTRY AND TRADE 1. It is requested that the following corporations upgrade their processes immediately. a. Dupont b. British Petroleum c. Chevron d. Amaco 2. Any orders that cannot be filled by these companies may be processed through Exxon Mobil Corporation in Beaumont, and Port Arthur as part of our Joint Venture. Sincerely, GEORGE ALLEN REEVE A Son of England

0false

0.000323

0.000036

Hi Fly. The best way to contact me is on my talk page (it's linked in the history for each article I've edited). I do not normally check other users' talk pages for messages addressed to me. I deleted the information because it was based on what I believed to be an unreliable source. It has since been re-added using a source from the Variety website. Also, it is acceptable to cite the credits of the film itself for such information, if you happen to have access to a copy. :On another note: Do you happen to have a photograph of McColl that you own the copyright to (that is, that you took yourself) and that you wouldn't mind uploading to Wikipedia? If so, that would be an excellent addition to the article. It would be a good idea to get his permission before uploading it, though I do not think that is technically required. Thanks.

0false

0.00003

0.000026

" PS. If one scrolls down here: http://www.discogs.com/master/view/79021 to ""other version"" one will find 42 different pressings of the soundtrack, most of them including photos of discs and track listing. I have browsed through most of them and have yet to find one that agrees the apodictic statement of Mark Miller who thinks he knows better than the record. "

0false

0.00001

0.000012

" ::not at all, microevolution can only do more of the same, create sub-species like all Darwin's finches, and then natural selection is conservative and not innovative it only select the subspecie fit to a specific environnement, in macroevolution a minute mutation of a homeogene will alter the ontogenese in it's whole creating new specie or even a new genus ""in a full-blown and viable state"" or end with an extinction , so you have not to search for missing links and the hyatus in the fossil record are no more a problem. "

0false

0.000017

0.000291

" :We have Ethnicities in Iran, Demographics of Iran, Iranians, and Iranian peoples. You say people use ""Persian"" instead of ""Iranian""? Maybe this article needs some clarification. Historical usage of ""Persian"" and modern ethno-linguistic usage of ""Persian"" or usage of ""Persian"" as an ethnicity. "

0false

0.000011

0.000094

==Lardil kinship table is unclear== It's not clear how to complete the kinship table for the Lardil. If you pair the lines into father/son pairs going down the table, you get matricycles of length 2, not 4 (as stated below the table). Switching lines 4 and 5 of the table would fix this, but I have no idea if that is the correct fix. Does anybody know?

0false

0.000024

0.000012

:Sorry, I masked it for better prose flow: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Why Rummel is always right.

0false

0.00001

Water fluoridation was developed by the Nazis for use in concentration camps to keep prisoners docile. It was brought to the US in the late 1940s under Operation Paperclip. This conspiracy is just the tip of the ice berg. Your government employs tens of thousands of people to obfuscate the evidence. Pathetic sheep lap up the spoon fed propaganda.

0false

0.000047

0.000055

== Protected edit request on 14 December 2014 == The film has a positive reception and has made 60 crores first day

0false

0.00001

Of-course. Is your 'Wikimood' getting better yet? (Its almost 3am here Shijt) ♥

0false

0.00003

0.000036

" == Minor edits == Thanks for your work on Variable Geo. I noticed this edit which was marked as a minor edit. Please use the ""minor"" checkbox only for changes which do not modify the informational content of an article. Examples would be additions of wikilinks, spelling corrections, etc. "

0false

0.00001

== یارمەتی == سڵاو خۆشەویست. دەتوانی لێرەدا یارمەتیمان بدەی و ھەروەھا بیروڕای خۆشت بنووسی. زۆر سپاس.

0false

0.000012

0.000202

I believe other publications also carried this story, but are less neutral and reliable than Campbell's articles. These are a little more than Op-Ed pieces. Campbell gives his credentials and provides supporting details in his PC-Pro article, including the exact name of the website Townshend accessed through Landslide. It's unfortunate that this case does reflect on the police handling of the investigation. However, it does seem to have gone wrong right from the beginning when the list of names was leaked from the police department to the press. Once it's become a public issue, then everyone has lost control. It would have been much better handled discreetly.

0false

0.000014

0.000037

The Japanese out scammed the Chinese with their Tokyo Sky Tower and it's enormous spire.

0false

0.00001

" :::::Halsall's article is 20 pages long (pp. 35-55). So there is a lot more to it than the two-page PDF. He may complain about the term ""Barbarian Invasions,"" but it's the one he uses. As for Delbrück, I think its significant that the main current translation uses ""Barbarian Invasions."" After all, we want to follow English usage and not German. Even while Britannica's ""ancient Rome"" article uses ""Barbarian Invasions,"" their ""Germany"" article uses ""Migration Period."" So it's primarily a question of whether you're viewing events through the Roman or German end of the telescope. "

0false

0.000012

0.000023

::Thanks for that I could see that on your cleanup edit - cheers!

0false

0.00001

, 13 July 2007 (UTC) ::::::::::::Yep. The killa bees. 15:34

0false

0.00001

UPOOP POOP POOP IT MEANS TO POOP COURT POOPS IN HER PANTS

0false

0.00001

0.000029

" :Please note that it says ""16th note triplets"", not ""16th notes"". 16th note triplets at 180 bpm means 18 notes per second - while 16th notes at 220 bpm is ""only "" about 14.67 notes per second. "

0false

0.00001

", 16 January 2015 (UTC) ::Well, I didn't say it should be, only that if it's 100% duplicative it should be. If it ain't, a merger and/or renaming might be appropriate, I don't have an opinion. 14:30"

0false

0.00001

0.000017

" ::Because all maps are copyrighted unless they are specifically released as otherwise. And how do you mean old, it was created post WW2. "

0false

0.00001

0.000013

:Appearances may be deceptive. I did continue to make some edits on the page, but they were not reverts of anything the other editor did. They were edits in good faith. For instance, I removed an OR section which I myself wrote. This is how I know it is OR. So that removal was not a revert. Cheers.

0false

0.00001

0.000019

::::::It must be hard for you. You know, being braindead.

0false

0.000789

0.001898

== Came up with the right dough? Bigger dick? I don't know, must have been the best flow. == I will never reveal the Wu Tang secret.

1true

0false

0.000132

0.048384

:::Khurram, I have removed your personal attack. Please restrain yourself in the future.

0false

0.00001

0.000011

And as it turns out, those racist thoughts were well based, just read the article.

0false

0.000824

0.00001

As the founder and CEO of WikiExperts I am happy to state clearly that, if WikiExperts is again able to edit Wikipedia, we agree to follow all COI Guidelines to the letter for every edit we make moving forward. That includes disclosure of any account used to make an edit from that point forward, as per the condition set within the original ban regarding the condition for unbanning. Disclosure will take place in full adherence to the COI Guidelines. Prior to the ban it was our opinion that it was unclear whether or not COI disclosure was mandatory, and if it had been made known to us that it was mandatory and not an issue for debate, we would never have made previous edits contrary to the guidelines. Now that we know disclosure is mandatory, we have altered our practices to adhere to the new set of rules. I have reviewed the above proposals for how new forms of COI declarations could occur, and state here that WikiExperts is fully willing to work directly with the Community to develop a system of declarations that makes the Community comfortable and provides an additional level of neutral scrutiny for all our contributions. We will not be posting, and have not posted in the past, anything that is/was not meant to help develop a more accurate and better Wikipedia, and we are comfortable working with the Community to prove our work can be beneficial to Wikipedia. Because of previously signed NDAs, we have no ability to reveal the past clients, however, we pledge to no longer sign agreements that would disallow us from full COI disclosure, so that all future work can be verified as within Wikipedia policies and guidelines. The Ethics page on our website already states as such, and past references to confidentiality of the service have been removed. We would very much like to prove that we are not harmful to Wikipedia, and to show that we add neither promotional nor non-notable material to the website when allowed to edit. , can you or somebody else please add this to the AN thread found here Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Exact_wording_people_are_supporting.3F as a response to the question posed by User:Hobit?

0false

0.000012

0.000065

" ==Just wondering, should it be split?== Wikipedia recommends it at 35 KB and this is many, many times longer. · · · "

0false

0.000015

0.000011

== May 2008== Please stop your disruptive editing. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. At this rate, your reign of retarded jokes will be over soon.

0false

0.203541

0.000012

(undent) The point is Tyrus there's a whol page for stuff like that; accomplishments, records, achievements, highest scoring average for a DPOY etc, etc.

0false

0.00001

0.000084

" ::Oh, and one more observationBernadette is wonderfully silly and goofy, and more than a little ""over-the-top"", but in recent performances (most especially Follies) she is quite subtle and nuancedperhaps reflecting the role, perhaps the woman. But, always emotionally raw and vulnerable. "

0false

0.000652

0.000012

" *Specifically, Charles Price was also convicted of breaching Rosenbaum's civil rights in 2002, and New York City paid $1.25 million in compensation to Rosenbaum's family in 2005 for negligence at the hospital he was taken to:. None of that can be covered in an article about Nelson. & "

0false

0.00001

"Oppose My view may be a little coloured by the fact that I say ""Our Father which art in heaven"" myself, but this is still by far the longest-lasting text. Once we change it to a supposedly ""modern English"" version, there will never be agreement on which one to use. Indeed, the argument already rages over whether to say ""Our Father"", ""Our Parent"" or ""Our Father-Mother"". Better not to go there. "

0false

0.000023

0.00008

== AUTARCH ANSWER THE ALLEGATIONS THAT YOU ARE A VANDAL == This is a message to Autarch who is leading a gang acting likea bunch of vigilantes. Autarch, stop playing the victim. You have been called to explain yourself and your actions. That is not a personal attack. You have acted in a bias manner and with malice. Again that is not a personal attack but a statement of fact. Answer the question. It is simple. I will ask it again. Why did you remove the statement that Foster was an international playboy when it was a direct quote from the most authorative voice in Australia, the ABC, i.e. the equivalent of the BBC here. Answer why, as an editor, you felt that was not relevant, given the public perception of him as an international playboy is that he used many women to promote his products and himself. Autarch, I am not attacking you as a person, but your actions which are VANDALISM. Now, you can answer my criticism by simply explaining WHY you removed the playboy tag. Nothing else. Don't run and hide. Don't deflect. Answer the question. I find your actions(again not a personal attack, just an observation of your actions) in spending hours late at night altering this mans profile so it can look as bad as possible, and deleting the good points both disturbing and worrying. I think you are a vandal. I also think you harbour a perdon vendetta against Mr Foster. I ask you again - have you ever met him? Answer that question. And, yes, stop being such a coward and answer the allegations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.211.78.219 (talk)

0false

0.079201

0.003046

== The Rev == Fuck You Buddy ) Mind ur own damn business. Have a good one. ∞∞∞∞

1true

0false

1.00001

" == Please help - inclusionism is ""absurb"" now == Sorry to bother you, but as an Inclusionist wikipedia things are getting desperate and I need to appeal to your for help. We are facing a situation where a deletionist admin is free to declare inclusionist arguments ""absurd"" and ignore them at will. If you don't agree with this situation, please share your opinion here. "

0false

0.00001

0.000014

== Hot Plug Footnote == The standard footnote tag is not functioning properly with symbols. -

0false

0.00001

" :I sensed I had seen you before around there. Yeah that's a good plan (already showing good instincts re: admin criteria); I want dibs on your nomination! ""D Photo on the main page, that's kick ass! Be sure to screen cap that action. See you when I see ya. - "

0false

0.000011

0.000048

I'm a blonde girl and I need proof that blonde girls like Jewish men. I am always harasssed by Jews but I don't find them very attractive. There is one article saying that blondes like Jews but it's written by a horny Jew, http://72.14.207.104/search?q=cache:6m3MU9VPFDkJ:www.gnn.tv/jump.php%3Fid%3DF01968+%22hot+waspy+women%22&hl;=en

0false

0.000022

0.000117

:Unless he declares this openly, stating that on this page would amount to libel. |

0false

0.000049

0.000021

::: Thanks a lot for fixing this up!

0false

0.00001

" :::The blog link was in the Wikipedia:External links section; thus the verifiability policy is not particularly relevant. From the external links policy, ""Sites with other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article, such as textbooks or reviews."" Also, ""Linking to copyrighted works is usually not a problem"". :::From what I've read, the Huaorani were one of the most violent people groups on earth. Life expectancy below 30 due to inter-clan revenge killings, and killings of anyone entering their territory. Am I wrong? That to me is ""violent"". Remember that that is the lead of the article and thus everything must be summarized; soon I'm going to add a paragraph explicitly sourced that talks about their history. :::To me, ""proselytise"" has a negative connotation. I don't really see the problem with ""hope to present Christianity""—it's not like the Huaorani were being force-fed the stuff; the foreigners had a specific mission and goal but we're not talking about Spanish invaders killing the Indians if they don't convert. :::It's bad formatting to describe a reference in the references section (it is never done in FAs, for example); I eliminated the text for a reason. I thought the comment was aimed at me, and noting it, I deleted the text. Once texts are included that are anti-missionary and are cited in the article text, it will be obvious which sources are anti-missionary (Thy Will Be Done, Fishers of Men or Founders of Empire, etc.), and which aren't. :::I was hoping to continue with the narrative, but this Friday probably I'll start working on an Aftermath section, including a discussion of what different anthropologists think about all this. "

0false

0.000016

0.000145

" If you think you can support any of the statements made by porn stars (or their representatives) about the size of their penises, you need to get out more. This is precisely why I requested a citation; you can't just go around saying that something is ""widely recognized"" without saying who ""recognizes"" it. Typical of men who like porn a little too much, you're letting the wrong head do the thinking."

0false

0.225402

0.000055

":Enough with the meaningless word games already, its really a stupid way to prove any point. We are talking about a person who was de facto not a King of Croatia, and was de jure a pretender to a throne held by Peter II of Yugoslavia. I'm getting seriously tired of repeating myself. To keep it simple, please answer me this: how can both Peter II and the Duke of Spoleto occupy the same throne at the same time, without one being identified as a pretender. "

0false

0.000187

0.000016