comment_text
stringlengths 1
5k
| toxic
class label 2
classes | severe_toxic
class label 2
classes | obscene
class label 2
classes | threat
class label 2
classes | insult
class label 2
classes | identity_hate
class label 2
classes | prediction_hate
float64 0
1
| prediction_nsfw
float64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wow, you're a funny motherfucker, you know that? Don't waste your talent here, you should be on the goddamn radio. Seriously though, vandalizing wikipedia for kicks? You need a hobby. Read a book, go outside, jerk off, just do something productive. | 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 1.00001 | 0.979893 |
80 million Turkish speakers outside of Turkey sounds like a pretty extreme guess and merely 55 million in Turkey itself sounds way too low. First off, how many monolingual speakers speak a language other than Turkish? Not all that many, one would imagine. I know for a fact that I've met many Kurds in Sweden that barely speak Kurdish, but speak Turkish fluently. And I was under the impression that the figure of Turks in Germany was closer to 1 million (which is still a lot). I say we should bring the estimates down to very conservative figures unless someone provides reliable source. To me the total 100+ million figure sounds very high.
: | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000028 | 0.000926 |
"
== intellexual review ==
This website has been debated time and time again. It has been removed after much debate spanning over 2 years. There have been many reasons stated for and against this web sites inclusion. But the reasons for its removal was best summed up with comments
:the intellexual.net review is unsigned and is published on what appears to be an unknown individual's personal web site, its subject was a technologically unremarkable product which is long defunct and whose performance may bear little relation to that of its successors, and it discusses the product in a gleefully negative framework that is anything but neutral and unbiased and is thus of dubious value as an encyclopedic link [..] Besides, if that stale and biased review is the most credible link that we skeptics can come up with, I'd say that's pretty sad.
So please don't link this site its POV it lacks verifiability and is tested on a particular product not made by Bose since the late 90's.
:Yes, but you don't write the rules. There is no wiki rule that says that objective measurements have to be signed, or calibrated, so the comments about the frequency remain. If you can find objective measurements of a Bose system that are more to your liking, please post them. Personally I thought my summary of that page was uncontroversial.
::you don't write the rules??? Ok please try to keep this civil... please! I have only been following them and it is very clear this this is a highly biased page and rather questionable. If you check you would see that it does not meet the standards of Verifiability:
::*third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy.
::*Questionable sources are those with a poor reputation for fact-checking or with no editorial oversight. Questionable sources should only be used in articles about themselves. (See below.) Articles about such sources should not repeat any contentious claims the source has made about third parties, unless those claims have also been published by reliable sources.
::*Anyone can create a website or pay to have a book published, then claim to be an expert in a certain field. For that reason, self-published books, personal websites, and blogs are largely not acceptable as sources
::**Self-published material may, in some circumstances, be acceptable when produced by an established expert on the topic of the article whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable third-party publications. However, caution should be exercised when using such sources: if the information in question is really worth reporting, someone else is likely to have done so.
::*If no reliable, third-party sources can be found for an article topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it.
::This web page fails everything, it has NO reputation for fact checking, these claims have not been cited from other reliable 3rd party sources, This person is not an expert or has he been credited as being an expert in the audio field, and has no notable published works aside from this single page.
::Nor does it pass reliability:
::*Reliable sources are authors or publications regarded as trustworthy or authoritative in relation to the subject at hand
::*Reliable publications are those with an established structure for fact-checking and editorial oversight.
::*In general, an article should use the most reliable and appropriate published sources to cover all majority and significant-minority published views, in line with Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.
::*In general, the most reliable sources are peer-reviewed journals and books published in university presses; university-level textbooks; magazines, journals, and books published by respected publishing houses; and mainstream newspapers. As a rule of thumb, the greater the degree of scrutiny involved in checking facts, analyzing legal issues, and scrutinizing the evidence and arguments of a particular work, the more reliable it is.
::*Anyone can create a website or pay to have a book published, then claim to be an expert in a certain field. For that reason, self-published books, personal websites, and blogs are largely not acceptable as sources
::*''Organizations and individuals that are widely acknowledged as extremist, whether of a political, religious or anti-religious, racist, or other nat | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000023 | 0.000069 |
"
:: Resolved with this edit. I've changed the image to one that is in the public domain. ,
" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
== Precious again ==
Latin American performer
Thank you for quality articles on games and albums, such as Sinistar: Unleashed, for featured lists on Latin American performers, such as Ricardo Arjona discography, for reviewing more than 100 Good articles, and for the recognition of the merits of others in their quality contributions and reviews, - you are an !
A year ago, you were the 360th recipient of my Prize,
:Thank you again, . It's an honour — Call me Hahc21
Move Like Thisby
::Thank you for your vote of trust and prayer, - see my talk for the significance of blue. What do you think of Move Like This in Spanish? We did German ;)
:::You're very welcome ) Wait, Move Like This has no Spanish article? We have to make one! — Call me Hahc21
::::when?
:::::Maybe next month. I have some projects already on the list and would like to have them FAC'd first. — Call me Hahc21
== Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers ==
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. —
== Hey ==
Hey, long time no talk. I'm looking at the PC 2014 RFC and noticed your name supported proposal one and two. Is that possible? Also, is there really any difference between the two?
:Hey ! Yes, I supported both because I see instances on which these two might be used. The main difference is that the first proposal is aimed at autoconfirmed users (Use PC2 instead of blocking them, since semiprotection wouldn't work) and the second does not differentiate any use types (applies to all users, and is used as a substitute to full protection). So, I support both because I see PC2 as a plausible solution in many instances where content creation cannot be delayed in spice of having socks or autoconfirmed users edit warring or something. Cheers. — [[User:Hah | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000013 | 0.000106 |
== allied photographs ==
whole article is covered by allied pictures. there is only one central picture, and its an EXECUTION!! lol i smell propaganda. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00002 | 0.005728 |
"
Welcome
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of ''' do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the ""sandbox"" rather than in articles.
If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}}''' below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.
*The five pillars of Wikipedia
*Help pages
*Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! \ " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000032 | 0.000022 |
== Be careful ==
That administrator, although not impartial, is still nonetheless an administrator. You don't want to be blocked because of this stupid discussion, no matter how unfair it is. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.151569 | 0.000355 |
*Sultanu'l-Wa'izin Shirazi | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
Hi. Since that ""Butte County"" entry was so short, I've redirected it for the time being. Take care. -
== List of North American area codes ==
You have unlinked some valid links - please re-instate. You have left [[ lurking in front of several codes - please tidy. The waste of space is irrelevant - Wikipedia is vast and and can spare the space. 08:26, 2005 Mar 13 (UTC)
Why have you removed links to articles which exist?? For example Area codes 201, 212, 213 and 218. Reply here, I shall be watching. 08:51, 2005 Mar 13 (UTC)
==Page move vandal==
I'm sorry to say you were the victim of a page move vandal. I hopefully have restored the histories of your personal pages now, so you can look old stuff up. Also please remember that it's always better to archive talk messages instead of deleting them. | " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000013 | 0.000033 |
Wikipedia sucks==
Why do they automatically delete ANYTHING connected to James Rolfe? I just tried to warn the world of Mr. Bucket's evil and very dangerous nature - that of sucking balls!
== | 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 0.564333 | 0.006603 |
said to be between January and February | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
==Requested move 08 January 2014==
:GWR 2-6-2T → – Page covers only this one class of GWR 2-6-2T, not all of them.
===Survey===
:Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*
===Discussion===
:Any additional comments: | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000012 |
I can provide a specific quote and/or page number in a few weeks when I get back from vacation, but I think among historians science, it's a pretty uncontroversial statement. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
== Fuck You, admins. Fuck you and your stupid copyvio. It was fair use. No one cares. There was no community consensus before you started deleting all these images. Wikipedia has turned into communism with a few admins bossing everyone else around. Why do you have to be so asinine? If I can't have my user page I am leaving. == | 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 1.00001 | 1.000005 |
:::::Sean, I'm glad you're not completely opposed to a separate article for targeted killings. And I agree that the notion that targeted killing is not assassination is not a universal one, though the article fairly reflects a number of peoples' views on the issue. It is the same as the question of whether abortion is murder some people think it is, but we wouldn't delete the abortion article, on the argument that abortion is a euphemism for murder, and redirect it to a subsection of the abortion article. The answer is to not have a POV push where TK is slotted under assassination, but keep it as its own 100K article, and add other views from RSs that you feel are missing. End of story. It's really pretty simple. I'm addressing that issue only, as that is the only issue here, not the editing of the article. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000014 | 0.000013 |
"
Prvo se promeni i ubedi ljude da si se promenio. Posle ce se blok ukinuti. Dakle, pisi clanke i to dobre clanke, nemoj dosadjivati ljudima. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000032 | 0.000033 |
== Questionable sentence ==
Why does it say that Will Scarlet's wife Elena was raped before she was trampled to death by the bad guys? Rape is non-consensual sex and sex is generally associated with love and attraction, not with hate. If bad guys don't like good guys, why would they want to have sex with them? That is morally violet. Violence generally dwells on pain and injury, not on sex. That part of the sentence should be removed. Besides, Will doesn't even mention that his wife was raped. Sexual violence is not associated with the Robin Hood legend. It should say that Elena was beaten or tortured before she was killed. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.026569 | 0.002685 |
Enough with the nonsense about the beer drinking fake viking. Repost it again and I will block this account. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.774029 | 0.008166 |
"
::I find I have to agree with Teque. The introduction, for example, basically notes that some people have positive opinions of non-commercial dog food, and some people have negative opinions of commercial dog food. There is no point in either of those statements. The ""Commercial dog food"" section appears to make a comparison of canned and dry food, where the facts in question are that dry food is cheaper, lasts longer, and is ""more convenient"", and that canned food spoils faster but has a longer shelf life, and contains more protein on a dry matter basis. This isn't exactly appropriate, and all of these facts are mentioned again in the article, so this comparison seems intended to criminalize dry dog food. Further, the concept of ""dry matter"" probably needs to be explained, as anyone who hasn't taken a Nutrition course is unlikely to know what that means. If you dried out wet dog food, and then— without the water weight— compared it on a gram to gram scale with dry dog food, yes, it would have more protein. However, a serving of wet food is mostly moisture, while a serving of dry dog food is mostly dry matter. So, as I understand, a dog gets a higher quantity of protein from a serving of dry food than a serving of wet food. I haven't added this to the article myself because I'm only repeating what I've been taught, I'm not intimately familiar with the subject. Moving on, in the ""Alternate dog food"" sections, it is insinuated that commercial dog foods have no or significantly less nutritional value than alternate dog foods (freeze dried, I believe, to be specific); a more appropriate statement would possibly be that freeze dried foods retain more of their natural nutrients, while processed foods add nutrients back artificially. Next, the statement ""Many commercial dog foods are made from materials considered unusable or undesirable"" is entirely opinionated. A statement that some ingredients can be unhealthy could be acceptable if backed by a citation of scientific research. Further, any list of ""contents"" should not include only ""undesirable"" ones. It should include all common ingredients. Otherwise, the list should be removed, as it draws focus to those specific ingredients. I just have to note, the only line in this section that suggests dry food has any value whatsoever is that expensive foods may contain ""suitable"" ingredients. It's true that the cheapest brands have the quality of shoe leather, and any brand with adequate nutrition will be more expensive, but no note is made that the expensive food brands tend to be, nutritionally, very healthy for dogs. As well, there is mention of some of the less savory by products that are allowed into foods by AAFCO, but no mention of the nutritional requirements necessary to be AAFCO certified. I'm not saying that having cow brains in dog food is desirable, but it should also be noted that dog food must meet certain nutritional standards to be AAFCO certified. Generally, the difference is considered to be that between ""complete"" and ""complete and balanced"". A dog can survive on a solely complete diet, whereas a balanced diet is actually healthy (and necessary to be AAFCO certified). Interestingly, many prescription diets aren't AAFCO certified, because they will often deliberately reduce some kind of nutrient, like sodium. While this might have ill effects on a typical dog, it's more healthy for one having heart problems. On the same topic, under ""Labeling"", AAFCO certification is disparaged. However, the only source for this is a person's opinion. The main point seems to be that AAFCO standards are worthless— whether or not they are, I couldn't say— but the point should be that the organization requires food to meet healthier standards. Next, a question— if there's an entire article on 2007 dog food recalls, is it necessary to go into such detail here? A more abridged form, like that used for ""past recalls"", that directs readers to the separate article might be more appropriate. Overall, the article focuses on negatives of dry dog food and does not allow for the facts that some types of dry dog food are very healthy, that some types of wet food may be unhealthy, or that some alternate foods may not be healthy. Further, there is an over-reliance on this type of statement: ""Some argue..."" ""Some maintain..."" ""Proponents criticize..."" ""Supporters believe..."" ""Critics argue..."" The majority of which, I'd like to note, promote negative opinions of dry dog food. Just because it is someone else's opinion, though, does not make it any less of an opinion. Most of these statements lack any support or citations, as well." | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000218 | 0.000085 |
You are currently blocked from editing Wikipedia for a 24 hour period because of vandalism. Please see Wikipedia:Vandalism. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000778 | 0.00001 |
== File:1944- The Loop Master Title.png listed for deletion ==
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1944- The Loop Master Title.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. - | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
::OK, thanks Tony. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
I'm not saying that it has to have an entry, but in the sometimes email bringing up that ""someone sucks,"" they'll sign it, ""that guy who said Cal Ripken sucks."" It was an absolutely hilarious call, and Rome tore him up afterward. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000013 | 0.000038 |
"
:Review is now complete.
Lead section
*""which left him with two broken vertebrae in his back."" Link vertebrae.
Practice and qualifying
*Add an image of Dario Franchitti, noting that he took pole position.
Race
*Can you add an image of the crash which occured on the first lap?
*""Minutes before the race start, reports of rain falling on the track caused the start to be delayed, by around ten minutes."" Mind if you move the source to the end of this sentence?
*""and much of the field pitting to change from dry-weather tyres to wet-weather ones."" Change pitting to pitted.
*""Briscoe's luck would run out"" Rewrite to Briscoe's luck would run out however""
Classification
*Add an image of race winner Will Power to this section.
References
*Refs 1, 4 and 30 give a 404 error for me.
Overall, I am happy to promote this article to GA status once these issues are addressed. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000027 | 0.000097 |
:Read what I said again. We don't get to write about ourselves on Wikipedia. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
SOMEBODY PLEASE FIX THE PAGE. LES ARE ALL OUT OF ORDER | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.816264 | 0.00001 |
:Excellent! Many thanks again. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
change my username and then | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
*Hope the PR was helpful - I did not look at the list, so if the links are there in general that seems fine. Since the Sir Lamiel is mentioned a fair amount in the article and is a pretty obscure Arthurian character, I think it would be helpful to identify him with a phrase or at most a sentence. I replied on the PR itself too. ''''''
" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000014 | 0.000013 |
"
== ""Partial virtualization"" ==
I've added a category of ""partial virtualization"" between ""full virtualization"" and ""paravirtualization"". Although this may not sit well with everybody, I think we need a category for a system like IBM M44/44X – with virtual machines and multiple address spaces, but not full hardware simulation and the ability to boot multiple operating systems. There is a fuzzy line between such a system and any OS that provides address space isolation. Or rather there really is no such line, and all such operating systems could be considered in the same category. We wouldn't tend to view them as virtual machine systems today, but they were a huge step forward from earlier approaches to multitasking. Please feel free to butcher my addition if you see a better way to deal with this. I don't think we want to rewrite history based on today's categories however. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000011 | 0.000042 |
conor molloy murdered all the jews | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.955403 | 0.000011 |
"
: Thus the question for the science advocate is not whether they are safe, but whether the economics and ethics stack up. If farmers in the developing world can grow more food with less water, and if that contributes to a reduction in starvation, or if they can grow rice with vitamins fixed, and that can reduce incidence of blindness in children, why would that be bad? So far the major objection I see is ""because Monsanto"". That's not a logical argument.
:" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000031 | 0.000012 |
"
==Army of Occupation Medal==
This article says, ""In 1941, Buckles received the Army of Occupation of Germany Medal for his post-war service in Europe during the year 1919."" But the Lede says he received that medal before 1920. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000022 |
Welcome!
Hello , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
*The five pillars of Wikipedia
*How to edit a page
*Help pages
*Tutorial
*How to write a great article
*Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!
I'd also like to add to the above that I removed the link to http://www.relisys.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/ that you added to the St Helens, Merseyside article, because at present that link is only showing a standard Blueyonder holding page. Please do carry on contributing, if you've got any questions, feel free to ask me on , and I'll try to answer or point you in the direction of an answer. | | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000018 | 0.000307 |
== Too many opinions and assumptions / Bias ==
This article is full of opinions, assumptions and appears bias. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00003 |
|listas = Lozano, Conrad | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
And stop removing mine, fuckface. | 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
::I agree, let's go through the article and remove every predicted event that did not happen, justification wp:crystalball. This article is not supposed to be a puff piece for better place. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000011 | 0.000073 |
:::That sounds fine to me. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for . Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
:::: Thanks for resolution. As you can see, there are no word ""genocide"" in that resolution. Q.E.D.
:::: So, the definition ""Parliament of Bosnia and Herzegovina condems the perpetrators of Khojaly genocide"" is a fake. Like all another ""news"" about ""perpetrators of Khojaly genocide"". " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000011 | 0.000026 |
OI ! you with the rapid fire delete button. Leave Derain
pix alone... They are purdy. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.540047 | 0.000619 |
== about the recent changes ==
I am not sure what you mean by adding Citation. I just added Divorce details which was already mentioned out there in her page. And its a news found every where on net. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000014 | 0.00001 |
September 2009 (UTC)
:No, official figures are max. 23% on average in certain mines. Still high, and processing is still needed - for purification and reliability (concentrations do fluctuate from rock to rock). I updated the article. 05:52, 4 | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000018 | 0.000012 |
==Anus pics==
Wikipedia is also a encyclopedia, not a bastion of ethics as glorified by Disney. I understand the reversion of Ann Coulter, but the anus pics should stay, you haven't stated a good reason for removing the. Also, next time sign your comments and bring the discussion to the actual article and not my page. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000027 | 0.002208 |
== Murder of Dwayne Jones GAR ==
Much appreciated George! All the best, | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000011 |
i am inside your mouth and am injecting u with a needle | 1true
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.999186 | 0.000114 |
== Successful RFA ==
I have closed your RFA as successful - you are now an en.wiki sysop. Please consider the guidance at Wikipedia:New admin school, it'll keep you from ending up here. Good luck! | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000136 | 0.000178 |
Our profile
INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR COMMUNAL PEACE AND HARMONY. (ISCPH) was legally established under the guidance of jurist, eminent educationists and social workers for the development of education in wide areas. Government of, MAHARASHTRA registered the society for propagation and development of CENTRAL INDIA INSTITUTE OF PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION (CIIPE) E-learning /distance education on the pattern of
E-learning & Distance Education System on 24 January 2011, initiated voluntary action in Bhandara-Nagpur. Subsequently, they registered it under the Society Act. 1860 Vide Registration No. MAH/34/2011 and F- 13978 and stepped forward with a view to spread its activities throughout Maharashtra State .The society, under Government of India, is Legal Autonomous and non-profit Institution and has legal right of teaching & training under the provision of constitution. Copies of Bylaws, prospectus, etc. are sent to the various Authorities and Departments of the Government of India/State Governments and Union Territories by the ISCPH from time to time. ISCPH is committed to the socio-economic and political development of the rural poor with a special focus on Women/ SC / ST& Minority of Maharashtra. The area of operation of the SOCIETY is wide and extensive all over India.
AIMS OF INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR COMMUNAL PEACE AND HARMONY. (ISCPH)
E-learning & Distance Education System, CENTRAL INDIA INSTITUTE OF PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION (CIIPE) took a leading step towards democratization of high professional education. This novel lead will cater to the needs of those students who are interested in higher education but are unable to join colleges and universities for lack of resources and time. This also imparts education to down trodden & backward at concession fee. ciipe also fulfills the aims of vocational educational right of Indian constitution 1950 under Article 14, 15, 19(1), 21, 26, 29, 30 fundamentally written & article 351 for development of Board under Government of India Act 21- 1860, is Legal, according to the Ministry of Human Affairs Govt. of India Notification No. 26/4/52 CC Dated 20.09.1952 Autonomous, Voluntary, Social, Autonomous Institution, established for development of education under the guidelines of National education policy 1986 by the Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD),Govt. of India. And programme of action 1992 Govt. of India.
Ciipe Goals
Non-for-profit membership institution. Was established and commenced its first student intake in 2011. ISCPH also provides its education services through CIIPE...
MAIN OBJECTIVES OF (ciipe):
CENTRAL INDIA INSTITUTE OF PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION (CIIPE) is a non-commercial autonomous educational institution with the aims of expansion and promotion of education, publication of scare, unique and newly written literature, pay honor and due promotion to the educationists. At present examination committee of ciipe is conducting its examination at about 350 centers throughout India under the guidance of Teachers & subject
Education
The institute of CENTRAL INDIA INSTITUTE OF PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION (CIIPE) educates professionals qualified to meet the challenges of the information society. The ability to generate, access, and use information has become the key factor in personal, social, and economic growth. The expanding global information society requires the free flow of information; and the impact of rapidly changing information and communications technologies is reshaping our personal, educational, and social activities, our organizational and political practices, and our local, national, and international institutions.
Roles, responsibilities, and career opportunities for professionals who can function as creative, information resource managers; act as culturally sensitive guides, navigators and interpreters for local and global users; and produce customized, culturally relevant, value-added services and products for diverse clienteles are expanding.
These professionals will play an increasingly vital role in empowering individuals, organizations, and communities to maximize the benefits of the information age. The knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary to be ethical,
Scholarship & concession fee
Concession fee for handicapped & disability person. Up to 80 %
The rural, poor & Women/ SC / ST& Minority & self-help group up to 90% concession.
Teacher, defense and police personnel Press and media persons and ex –service men
CIIPE candidate 25%concession
VISION STATEMENT:
The Embodiment of Lifelong Learning .Education for all.
Strategic alliance with leading National/International Institutes World class center for quality Education and Training. Global | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000047 | 0.000119 |
"
==Online Ambassador Program==
Please take a look at this project page and see if you can be a mentor to one of the many Areas of Study. If you can, please put your name in the ""Online Mentor"" area of the Area of Study of your choice and then contact the students you will be working with. As the Coordinating Online Ambassador for this project, please let me know if I can be of assistance. Take Care... • • " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000024 |
It is a shame, but I DO think that an outside website to act like a watchdog is a good thing in theory, but I've not seen it in practice. There are plenty of reasons to complain about admin, the power structure, or other aspects of Wikipedia. I screw up too, and have been called out onwiki and will admit it. There are real issues at enwp and it isn't always easy to discuss them here. Suffice it to say that not every person of power likes to see others talk about our flaws. That was one of the ideas behind WP:WER, to discuss our flaws, and as you know, not everyone with extra bits is happy with WP:WER. Maybe someday someone will make a website to do what WPO promised, with actual accountability for what people claim there. Then I would love to join a website. Otherwise, it is just hypocritical. | | WER | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000597 | 0.000069 |
::It shouldn't have to be pointed out that when somebody is being criticised on the net and the Wikipedia article about them refers to this criticism, then this does not mean that the issue is disputed. Of course nobody likes being criticised. But a controversy is when other people disagree about the criticism. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000729 | 0.002997 |
: I'm willing to objectively update this article. What would you include? I believe that a section for Technorati's history as a blog search engine is appropriate. You didn't sign your comment so I can't get in touch with you. I'll go ahead and edit the article and if you notice I miss anything please let me know here (or tweet my username). | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000018 | 0.000018 |
"
==Christian view tweaks==
I have made some small changes to the Christian view section:
*I have changed the dates of the Ecumenical councils: those professed with Christology do not include Nicea II in 787. To include it here might imply that the dates encompass all Ecumenical Councils, which is incorrect, as even the Eastern Orthodox accept 8 Ecumenical Councils, though there is disagreement about the identity of the 8th Council.
*I have reworded the Jesus-Trinity passage, mainly including the word Hypostases since the word person can be problematic nowadays (this also provides a prelude to the later word ""hypostatic union""), and shifting the link to ""Trinity"". The article formerly talked about ""a doctrine known as the Holy Trinity"", when the Trinity is not a doctrine.
*I have also reworded the ""two natures"" passage, starting with the one person and then stating the two natures. I have also reworded it so that it clearly says that there is one fully human and one fully divine nature - the former wording seemed to say that Jesus had two natures that both were human AND divine.
*Finally, I have added a link to Monophysitism, as this article might be profitable to the reader in this context. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000023 | 0.000026 |
"
== Hidden Tasks ==
Not all tasks are listed. Extra steps are required to view the ""hidden"" tasks:
""you can view hidden tasks that are run by programs if you log on to the computer by using administrator credentials. To view hidden tasks, follow these steps:
Click Start, click Run, type control schedtasks in the Open box, and then click OK.
On the Advanced menu, click View Hidden Tasks."" http://support.microsoft.com/kb/883605
""By default, hidden tasks are not shown in the Task Scheduler user interface. You can view hidden tasks when Show Hidden Tasks is selected in the View menu. You make a task hidden when you click the Hidden check box on the General tab of the Task Properties or Create Task dialog box.""
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc749579%28v=ws.10%29.aspx
- " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000102 | 0.000099 |
{ACA.006.05} ____ ... Proofreader and his sonnets with bullshit.
{ACA.006.06} ____ Apologize. Why don't you? You're so bad.
{ACA.006.07} ____ I bet they made fun of you... yeah yeah, spit.
{ACA.006.08} ____ They do not care at all if RUDE-MOOD'S sad ...
{ACA.006.09} ____ ... enough to be offline with gun in hand.
{ACA.006.10} ____ Oh no, he's just pissed off, says fang-dog one
{ACA.006.11} ____ who's never scraped one word within the sand
{ACA.006.12} ____ of RUDE-MOOD's talk page. Nothing to be done.
{ACA.006.13} ____ Someone might die because of fang-dog's barks.
{ACA.006.14} ____ The social pack is hungry for its marks. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.924864 | 0.150429 |
":I am not unhappy, and I have not lost my temper, although you apparently have. I have noticed you try to ""spin"" reality with a dedication worthy of Pravda. When will you learn that you can't make something true just by saying so?
" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000052 | 0.000031 |
"
== A barnstar for you! ==
{| style=""background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;""
|rowspan=""2"" style=""vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;"" |
|style=""font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;"" | The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
|-
|style=""vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;"" | Thanks
|}" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000023 |
*Yes. This article is about all 3 Yugoslavias that existed, and all 3 are included in the map. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000012 |
::Okay, I have removed text and cites from ReelSF, NoirCon and SocketSite. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
::::::::::::I don't think it's silly. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
There's also a link now to a manga called ""Phoenix,"" does this really need to be there? Just because it also tells stories across a wide span of eras doesn't mean it has any vital relation to the film. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000021 |
shit! I hate this country! | 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 1.00001 | 0.969233 |
আমি মনে করি কৎনgসর | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
==Imagine images!==
I checked Commons and I really like these images. Could someone please add them to the article?
*File:The Blue Marble.jpg
*File:Bachalpseeflowers.jpg
*File:Sunset in El Porto, California (8074300769).jpg
*File:Polarlicht 2.jpg
*File:Red eyed tree frog edit2.jpg
*File:Schoolgirls in Bamozai.JPG
Thanks zillions !! | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000106 |
"
==Heads up==
Just a heads up. You do know that imdb is not a WP:Reliable source and is noted used in references because like wikipedia it is a user generated site. Therefore we tend to link it in the external links without using it as a formal template. Besides which there is a template that is used for it rather than a bare url see The Surgoen's Knife. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000011 | 0.000045 |
"
::Good work last night. Could you do something about the phrase ""...it was considered an ""odd-pairing"" for Willis and Allen..."" namely, attributing who 'considered' it? A Peer or GA reviewer is bound to pick up on that. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000014 | 0.000014 |
== Punctuation ==
In the U.S., unlike the U.K., commas and periods go inside quotation marks. (Semi-colons go outside.) I normally wouldn't point this out, but I thought you might want to know since you went to the trouble of altering what was standard American punctuation. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000391 | 0.000052 |
After all, did we not kill the Jews? | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.225645 | 0.00001 |
== Our reputation and integrity ==
Our reputation and integrity is being attacked at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Premier Marinas. - | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000049 |
"
:And now the insertion of this error continues. The editor is using this reference, which says that ""Of the 18 groups profiled below, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) will be listing 13 next year as hate groups (eight were previously listed), reflecting further research into their views; those are each marked with an asterisk."" Editor's comment seems to suggest he believes that the 13 listed will be in addition to the previous eight, rather than reiterating them... but if it was 13 in addition to 8, we'd need to have more than 18 groups on this list. And, as noted above, the SPLC specifically denies that NOM meets their ""hate-group criteria"", in that later document. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000017 |
== Image:Jakes12292007-all2.jpg listed for deletion ==
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Jakes12292007-all2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000011 |
==Proposed deletion of related article==
Deletion of Religious conversion and terrorism is proposed.
For discussion see: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Religious_conversion_and_terrorism | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"""A"" class is something I'm not inheriting, because that is the one that almost always has project-specific criteria. The rest usually fall in line. In any case, I'm using a parameter to flag the fact that it's inherited, so humans may review. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
== No mention of The Apprentice ==
The ""2010–present: The Apprentice and Memphis Blues"" section actually has no mention of The Apprentice in it." | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
Hello, 65.36.86.233, and welcome to Wikipedia! While efforts to improve Wikipedia are always welcome, unfortunately your contributions are not written in English that is good enough to be useful. You appear to be more familiar with Chinese; did you know there is a Chinese Wikipedia? You may prefer to contribute there instead. In any case, welcome to the project, and thank you for your efforts!
您好，65.36.86.233。歡迎來訪英文版的維基百科。雖然我們隨時歡迎你在英文版維基百科編輯，但是你這次執筆所使用的英文並未達到英文版維基百科所需求的水準。若是你們不介意的話，你們可以在中文版維基百科編輯。感謝你們參加維基百科。 () " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000019 |
"
:Sorry, I should have pointed you at my talk page too. Thanks for helping! " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
== Administration ==
Admins sind die Größten Arschlöcher die es Gibt zumindest die aus Wikipedia weil die kein Spaß verstehen dumme Fotzenköpfe
Wieso Wikipedia Admins Dumm sind-
SIE SIND SCHWULER ALS ALLES WAS DU DIR VORSTELLEN KANNST WEIL SIE ALLE 5Kinder mit Jens haben (Jens wohnt in NeuenKirchen) | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 1.000001 | 0.899855 |
==Categories==
Re: and similar edits: silicon chemistry should refer to processes, not to independent materials. For example, silicon-germanium is not a product of chemical reaction of Si and Ge. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000013 |
"
==Mythologies==
It seems that the section of Star designations treats myths erroneously.
1. Stars have no myths by themselves, in a few cases the brightest star got the name that originally belonged to an entire constellation, such as Capella (only an independent constellation in the antiquity), Arcturus and Procyon, but the attached image ""little she-goat"", ""bear-watcher"" and ""fore-dog"", mostly belonged to an entire constellation.
2. It also seems, among others from J. H. Rogers' investigations, that the image was primary for the constellations, and the myth was something borrowed from the culture and attached in order to fit to the image.
This stars-representing-souls stuff and individual-stars-having-myths stuff seems to be extrapolations without any factual foundation. ... said: " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000018 | 0.000304 |
==Deletion Review==
For Category:Wikipedians by physiological condition and all subcats
I will request deletion review as there were more Keeps than Deletes unless you make a valid counterpoint - this request uis per rules for Deletion Review | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
===Skylanders 4 identity revealed===
Thanks to this video I've recently watched, I've figured out what the 4th Skylanders game is going to be called. Skylanders: Trap Team. It will be released for the Wii, WiiU, PS3, PS4, Xbox 360, and Xbox One, and it will be released on October 5, 2014. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000011 | 0.00002 |
thank you come again | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
fhdfhuidhfpidhfihihfd uhfhi ihf hfd dhf hg g hhgh gfhghhhhghhghfg | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
:*Comment that website supports that they are schizophrenic | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
":::The left-right paradigm is a hoax. The term ""right wing"" is used to insult people. There is little value editing Wikipedia, as ""fools"" just delete facts and replaces it with propaganda. Wikipedia is a propaganda platform and does not reflect correct Historical facts. Talk pages are deleted to censor ""points of view which doesn't support the official story"" of Mandela's sainthood.
The most important information are the facts deleted by Wikipedia, e.g. the convictions of Mandela. The official list of Convictions of Nelson Mandela are deleted or not allowed on Wikipedia. Mandela was send to jail, but nobody is allowed to know why he was send to jail, only that a ""saint was send to jail"".
Google ""Wikipedia Bias"" and you will note it's a common problem.
" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000166 | 0.000026 |
Ellie Goulding is no longer involved with Greg and is single. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
==from Blue Harbor Resort talk page==
You said:
I did my best. There is a Sheboygan Committee, go to The City's Website and click on Agendas/Minutes and find it there. If you don't like our job, please let us know!
:I appreciate your effort, and I don't dislike your contributions. I don't think that ANY buildings stability should be in wikipedia, except for the Leaning Tower of Piza, LOL! I do my best to improve any articles in Wikipedia. I hope you feel the same way, and improve articles that I contributed towards too! I realize you're new to wikipedia, so you may need a little help for a short while to understand how things work here. That's all. Cheers! " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000072 | 0.000034 |
==Toronto Sun is a legitimate source==
The Toronto Sun is a legitimate source. It is read by millions of people everyday and is published by a reputable news corporation. If you can find evidence to the contrary please let me know. ( ) | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000019 | 0.000015 |
ireland is a graeat place to be for me and you! | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.014785 | 0.000016 |
"
==EAAN==
You suggested several times that ID and EAAN are intimately related. You then blocked the discussion, so people can't dicuss the topic anymore. Because of this, I'm posting the arguments in you talk-page. Alternatively you could unlock the discussion page again, because to most people who understand EAAN the article is now in a dissatisfying condition and we'd like to discuss its improvement.
It seems there are two main arguments on your side:
:Plantinga presented the argument at Intelligent Design conferences (Creationism's Trojan Horse p269).
:It has been discussed in a book about ID and its critics.
Here is my response.
:# The argument is an argument against Naturalism given evolution. It can't be reformed to be an argument against evolution given naturalism, because as Plantinga says himself, ""for the naturalist evolution is the only game in town"". James Beilby writes in his foreword to Plantingas Argument(Evolutionary Argument against Naturalism - Essays on Plantinga's Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism, 2002, p. vii) ""Plantinga's argument should not be mistaken for an argument against evolutionary theory in general or, more specifically, against the claim that humans might have evolved from more primitive life forms. Rather, the purpose of his argument is to show that the denial of the existence of a creative deity is problematic. It is the conjunction of naturalism and evolution that suffers from the crippling deficiency of self-defeat, a deficiency not shared by the conjunction of theism and current evolutionary doctrine."" The conclusion of the argument is interesting for any non-naturalist or theist (and may be presented at any conference concerning all sorts of theisms/deisms). But this doesn't relate the argumet more intimately to ID than any argument of natural theology. As a matter of fact, an ID proponent has a problem deploying the argument: if he convinces his naturalis friend of the truth of ID instead of evolution, he can't use EAAN anymore, since evolution is a premis of EAAN.
:#EAAN is in the book for the mentioned reasons. There is also a chapter on theistic evolution in the book. Yet, theistic evolution clearly isn't related to ID in the sense required by wikipedia.
:#Plantinga may or may not agree to evolution. He may even be a proponent of ID (which is not at all clear). But even if he was a fierce proponent of ID, this doesn't automatically relate all his work to ID. I have read quite a lot of Plantingas work (Knowledge of god, god and other minds, naturalism defeated, God, Freedom, and Evil, The Analytic Theist: An Alvin Plantinga Reader and some essays) and he never so much as mentions ID. ID is not present in his work and most notably EAAN is not related to ID, because it has evolution as its premise.
I hope to have convinced you that for the sake of the quality of wikipedia the ID passage and tag should be gone. If this is not enough, we'll have to let other people decide who's got the better arguments.
Thanks. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000025 | 0.000091 |
"
::Firstly, making up non existent words such as death crime or death defence to argue that death penalty is inappropriate word is spurious. In fact you are somewhat making my point. You say capital punishment is tied to capital crime. ""Capital"" denote ultimate or prime or ultimate, making reference to severity or significance. So it can refer to a city (London) as well as crime or penalty. ""Death"" is a matter of fact reference to the content. For this reason, death city makes no sense. In reverse, death penalty is more matter of fact (NPOV) reference than capital punishment. Moreover, your claim that that ""We (American?) uniformely describe crimes elibigle for capital punishment as capital crimes"". A simple google search shows that the claim of uniformality is not sustainable even in U.S.A.
::Secondly, your made a claim in term of general usage. Therefore, google search with few millions sample is infintely more authoritative source than your sample (few entries dictionaries which subsequently equate DP and CP anyway). Even if we somewhat restrict ourselves to academic reference (which include legal dictionary or encycropedia), google scholar search, which make comprehensive search of academic papers, shows that death penalty is more common reference. You can also make few other type of search. Try using google news, which makes comprehensive reference to journalism. It shows overwhelming usage of death penalty over capital punishment. Or try using ask.com search which uses subject-specific link popularity to compute ""authoritativeness"" of a search result. Again it shows that death penalty is more common reference. Most top search for DP are from U.S as well. Capital punishment may be more common usage in sentencing which is a specific legal procedure in jurisprudence (which explain legal dictionary reference). This restcited context cannot be used to argue for commonality of usage of capital punishment both in public, journalism and academic world. This is another indication that DP is more NPOV than CP. Anyway, if you want to use few dictionaries entry as your evidence, feel free to do so. We appear to be heading to arbitration process. Consensus is prefered but not to the extent of filbuster. Ultimately, I don't have to convince the opposing advocate(s). I only have to convince the jury (arbitrator) that my case is more NPOV than yours. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000049 | 0.000156 |
"
==External Links==
Devastating firsthand account: [;""Get Off the Fucking Freeway: The Sinking State Loots its Own Survivors,"" Guerilla News Network" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.783503 | 0.737921 |
The significance is that it is the only newspaper account of the event, and as such people may be inclined to doubt its existence or think it a hoax. By showing that it was reprtined in other newspapers, people can dee that it was indeed a real article, and can also see if the news had any national interest at the time. It's important for context. Damion | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000018 | 0.000012 |
I like sex >=) | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.999743 | 0.00001 |
", 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)
====Occupation and first government of Iraq====
*""First"" by itself won't work; makes it sound like Iraq is a newly constituted entity.
====Occupation and transitional government of Iraq====
*Wordy, could be unclear concerning other occupations.
====Post-invasion Iraq====
*Could be any invasion, any time. 18:03" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000011 | 0.000018 |
I thought this would cause incoming editors to believe the RFC was officially over when in fact it wasn't. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
Darby
Can someone figure out once and for all what Darby's role is going to be, and change all the pooh articles to reflect it? | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
:Yes it appears that a consensus don't like this pic - I'll replace it with a better one tomorrow. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |