comment_text
stringlengths 1
5k
| toxic
class label 2
classes | severe_toxic
class label 2
classes | obscene
class label 2
classes | threat
class label 2
classes | insult
class label 2
classes | identity_hate
class label 2
classes | prediction_hate
float64 0
1
| prediction_nsfw
float64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
== Requested move ==
:Kris Wu Yifan → – WP:UCN, exo-m.smtown.com, he is simply referred to as Kris. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000029 |
:*The only other editors who did more than just tagging or minor edits are who is almost certainly a puppet based on his edit history, and who was responsible for a previous copyvio version of the article and whose work on this article was immediately removed by the author. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000046 |
::::That's a fascinating view of the German wikipedia you just linked to. In any event, the whole Ann Coulter thing is a red herring. The problem is with the basic governance structure, not anyone's personal foibles. (In Australia we have a tradition that politicians' personal lives are not drawn into their political careers - at least in contrast to the United States, anyway.) | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00005 | 0.000071 |
"
:The information regarding the 670 chemicals composing toxaphene was found in multiple sources but the most reliable one was the ATSDR toxilogical profile for toxaphene. The link to this source is http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ToxProfiles/tp94.pdf and can be found in the ""External links"" section. It is the full report from which the 3rd citation, ""Toxaphene - ToxFAQs,"" pulls all its information and summarizes. do you think I should provide this detailed .pdf with its own reference or leave it in the external links section?" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000011 |
==Cleanup of the Criticims of feminism section==
As per the discussion in the discussion above on this topic, I went through this section and deleted counter-criticisms to the criticisms so that clarity is possible and to eliminate enmeshment. I made NO judgements about ANY of the POV's of any counter-criticisms I cut and I mean NO Offense here. I hope to see them ALL included in a section that is relevant such as maybe Responses to criticisms of feminism or whatever. I cut them because they are completely irrelevant to the section as titled, because in some cases they completely buried the few short criticism statements themselves and because it is important to fully develop the criticisms, by themselves, before counter-criticising them if we are to understand these critisms at all.
I did add one little statement of (child abuse/parental abuse) content to one criticism because I happened, by coincidence, to have done the research for another article but I am not a member of that group, nor do I back that criticism as mine...I just saw it was relevant to that criticism and it may well need to be cut too unless THEY use it to back THEIR claims.
Finally, I tried to cleanup some tortured paragraphs by separating separate topics into new paragraphs, making it clear who was criticising in each PP and asking for specifics where I was confused as I read the content.
Again I hope to see the full scope of all criticisms and counter-criticisms included in this article with distint, complete and clear arguments. This cleanup is in NO WAY meant to imply that any of these counter-arguments themselves were wrong or irrelevant...just that they do not belong in this section which is for the arguments against feminism themselves. I welcome comments and suggestions about how to handle both criticisms and counter-criticisms in ways that the average wiki reader can read and comprehend easily, and that are complete, balanced, sourced and NPOV. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000029 | 0.000422 |
I haven't read the book yet, but will definitely jump on that as soon as I am done with the book. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000015 | 0.00001 |
nocbloch your wiener from getting AIDSt | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
== Still POV ==
Per the discussion above, I have restored the POV tag. What need to be done to move this article toward neutrality? | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000019 |
== Hamburger stand in Miami ==
I personally saw the Hilton Twins in downtown Miami in 1952, where they operated a hamburger stand. (Actually it seemed to be more of a juice bar.) They were amazingly agile, scuttling back and forth behind the counter. Miami was alive in those days. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000016 | 0.000045 |
"
:The former. The one at /useful, one of them that is, just src includes VoA/monobook.js so it is the same as .'''''' " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
a child solider is fg fdgdf g dgd gdhd h | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.005439 | 0.000013 |
::I looked but don't see that Wikileaks has published anything that says Obama didn't write the letter. I'd be grateful if you could post the link here. Thanks.( ) | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
yes and davie is a homosexual | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.02034 | 0.00001 |
"
== Ebony article? ==
Does anyone have a citation to the 1990 Ebony article mentioned on this page? A search of issues since 1989 (in an online database) turns up nothing that matches this description, and no 1990 articles that come at all close. The reference was added by user Antares33712 at 20:19, 29 December 2005. It's possible that my search results were incomplete, but it's also possible that the author misremembered the publication or the article details.
Because the current page accuses Ebony of printing misinformation (regarding Mariah Carey's race) and also suggests that the magazine article made other questionable claims, any mistake (either an inaccurate paraphrasing of an actual Ebony article, or a misattribution of someone else's article to Ebony) could be considered harmful to the magazine, and conceivably libellous. I'm insufficiently familiar with Wikipedia's standards to take the step of removing it myself (I just added a ""fact"" tag), but I wanted to call particular attention to the question in case others deem this the sort of thing that requires expedited action. And of course, if someone does have a citation to add, or can correct any mistakes without deleting the entire reference, that would certainly be preferable!
" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000012 | 0.000119 |
"
* (2009) ""Intermezzo 2"" by Mew" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
:If there's a mistake, there's nothing that can be come on Wikipedia. According to UNESCO, there are only two World Heritage sites in Albania, not four. As far as UNESCO are concerned, the Ohrid Lake is in the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. I'm sorry, but Wikpedia's polices on verification mean that we must go with the UNESCO source. This means that there is no room for quibbling over state boundaries on the article. However, you may wish to get in touch with UNESCO who may be able to provide you with an explanation. Happy editing, | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000246 |
Pro government SANA also announced the army took over over the al-Qarieh al-Shamiyeh(not diplayed in map) in the Eastern Ghouta. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000011 |
I'm taking a break from heavy editing on Wikipedia for a while, but I am still making minor edits all the time. Feel free to leave a message, but I may not respond right away. - | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
::: Okay first on the sources, I am not a scholar myself. I'm a Buddhist practitioner who has heard many teachings on the subject but not studied the sutras. But you can check out the Karma in Buddhism article which goes into all these points in detail. For instance Karma_in_Buddhism#Characteristics.
::: Does that answer your question about sources? These points are common to all the Buddhist schools and covered in the sutras - but a Buddhist scholar would be best to give the sources for them if you want more details.
::: Yes my comments are focused on Karma in Buddhism because that's the only form of Karma I know about.
::: Yes - I know there is a great deal of discussion of these topics. For sure it would be good to have a discussion section here. I have no problem with it discussing and criticizing these ideas. The issue is with it calling these ideas Buddhist without any sources to back up the claim that they are Buddhist ideas - and within a framework of non Buddhist concepts.
::: It would be good to have a proper informed discussion of karma and comparison of the different ways it is understood in different traditions and problems with it. But this isn't it.
::: Indeed if you check the sources given for many of the comments here - they come from a series of articles whose authors - as best I can tell (they are rather technical theological articles) - are looking at the possiblity of applying the Eastern idea of karma to give an explanation of why a just and good God can permit a world with evil and suffering in it. The article I read didn't claim to be an overview of Eastern ideas of karma - but rather an application of them to theology. That's why it is imbued throughout with ideas from Western theology that do not fit well with Eastern ideas.
::: So - if this material is included -it needs to be made clear where it comes from and what the discussion is - and given its proper context, and because the sources are articles by Western Christian theologians - at least the ones I followed up - that is another reason why it belongs in the Western section.
I hope that is clear, but sorry I am only a Buddhist practitioner and not a scholar and can't write such a section myself.
::: Perhaps others can step in here? | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000012 | 0.000033 |
"
=== ... and one from me! ===
== Greetings from Wales ... you are correct. ==
Early life: rem ungrammatical comma - the adjective ""cramped"" is attributed to the noun phrase ""living conditions""; hence, ""living"" is not an adjective but an attributive noun.
Yes, you are correct. I shall blame my error on having just returned from a two weeks holiday, and the lateness of the hour.
My father, who was a commissioned officer in the British Army, was in Norway for the latter part of World War II, and always spoke fondly of your country.
With kind regards,
: Thanks for the heads-up. Cyfarchion,
:: Diolch yn fawr, Eisfbnore! " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.0001 | 0.000938 |
"::To me, it seems to be using weasel words to simply say ""Critics have accused Olbermann of liberal bias"" and leave it at that without referencing any particular critics or their specific comments. Just a citation to a notable conservative critic or two would be nice. Something from the Media Research Center, for example. I've rewritten one of the sentences to actually provide a quote from Olbermann, but the cited article that has been provided for that quote really doesn't say that he's been accused of liberal bias by anyone other than a blogger who has an anti-Olbermann site. The article simply talks about Olbermann's critical commentary on the Bush Administration. Comments/articles that actually accuse Olbermann of having a liberal bias/political agenda should be cited. The complaints that are listed in that section now are not sourced.
" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000029 | 0.000045 |
"
:Yes, and part of the discussion in that article is about the meaning of the phrase ""natural born citizen"". If the U.S Code is irrelevant to the interpretation of the Constitution, then the musings of philosophers and politicians about the meaning of ""natural born citizen"" is even more so. In fact, the very purpose of the U.S. Code is to clarify the Constitution. Your assertion that the U.S. Code is not relevant is strictly POV, and not very accurate, especially since ""natural born citizen"" MEANS ""citizen at birth"". " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000023 | 0.000076 |
==A light bit of vandalism==
I didn't want to put npov text in the article, so this shall go here:
:I hate this whore, and everything that she stands for.
Now back to your regularly scheduled wikipediaing. | | | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000187 | 0.000242 |
"
== BLPTALK on Irom Sharmila talk page ==
Hi Liz! I'm just wondering why you re-added the BLP violations on the Sharmila talk page? There are some fairly serious allegations there. I wasn't sure if I should have removed the comments completely or just the sentences with the violations, but as the comments had very little to do with the article I thought it was okay to remove them completely. Also I was hoping someone reading the ANI thread would help out. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000065 |
this page should be altered to relflect the fact that John Luther Adams is a badass. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000012 | 0.000027 |
, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
::::It is a fact that the book was published. It is fact that it is not taken seriously. The paragraph only contains facts, and is not a ludicrous fiction. Just because A Midsummer Night's Dream is a ludicrous fiction, does not mean that mention of it should be excluded from wikipedia. Similarly, although Jack the Ripper: Lighthearted Friend is a ludicrous fiction, that does not mean that mention of it should be excluded. It should be mentioned and analysed in an appropriate way. 12:29 | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000012 | 0.0009 |
"
== Pending changes reviewer ==
First of all, i would like to thank you for adding me in this group. But, what does the term ""pending changes reviewer"" mean? Can you please explain in your own words! " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
== French overtures to Japan, 1883-5 ==
Hi ,
Thanks for that interesting stuff you have dug out on French attempts to cosy up to Japan against China before and during the Sino-French War. I'm going to search Albert Billot's L'affaire du Tonkin, the standard French diplomatic history of the Sino-French War, to see if he can add anything to your research.
What I would like to do eventually is merge your new section into the existing section 'China's fear of Japan', and probably cut it down a bit. At the end of the day, France and Japan did not become allies, and I think it unbalances the main article to devote so much space to something that never happened. On the other hand, I've long been wanting to create a new article, Diplomacy of the Sino-French War, and that would be the natural home for a discussion of French overtures to Japan. I'll try to get round to it before long.
I'll get back to you after I've seen what Billot has to say on the subject.
P.S. Nice photo you uploaded of French soldiers in Tonkin in 1888.
P.P.S Can you spare a couple of minutes to do me another 'dioceses' template, 'Dioceses of the Syrian Orthodox Church'? Just change the title from the present 'Dioceses of the Church of the East template and scrap the illustrations, and I'll do the rest. I know how to edit existing templates but I haven't yet worked out how to create new ones. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000027 | 0.000049 |
== German occupation of Czechoslovakia ==
Ahoj, as I know, that you are interested in modern history. There is article German occupation of Czechoslovakia, but this article looks not so good and can be improved. Can you help me? Děkuji | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000011 |
"::When people are talking to each other they probably say ""Suzukake Nanchara"" or start saying the title then give up part way through because the only people who give a shit about the band are the diehard fans who will listen to whatever they say, and the fact that they once said ""You can use 'Suzukake Nanchara' as an abbreviation"" does not mean that it has become the common name nor is the other abbreviated form. The form used in reliable sources to refer to the song is the full title. Unlike When the Pawn..., there is no technical restriction to speak of whatsoever in having the full romanisized tile of this song on Wikipedia, which is why the article exists at the location it does. Suzukake no Ki no Michi de "Kimi no Hohoemi o Yume ni Miru" to Itte Shimattara Bokutachi no Kankei wa Dō Kawatte Shimau no ka, Bokunari ni Nan-nichi ka Kangaeta Ue de no Yaya Kihazukashii Ketsuron no Yō na Mono works in the software. When the Pawn Hits the Conflicts He Thinks like a King What He Knows Throws the Blows When He Goes to the Fight and He'll Win the Whole Thing 'fore He Enters the Ring There's No Body to Batter When Your Mind Is Your Might So When You Go Solo, You Hold Your Own Hand and Remember That Depth Is the Greatest of Heights and If You Know Where You Stand, Then You Know Where to Land and If You Fall It Won't Matter, Cuz You'll Know That You're Right does not. I am tired of arguing this point. There's nothing wrong with the present title of the page becasue it is the title that meets with all of the article titling policies and guidelines. WP:CONCISE does not cover this and neither ""Suzukake Nanchara"" (only referred to as the ""official abbreviation""), ""Suzukake no Ki no Michi de...Yaya Kihazukashii Ketsuron no Yō na Mono"" (only used when a technical restriction exists on iTunes and other music retailers), nor ""Suzukake No Ki No Michi De uKim..."" (a technical restriction at the American Billboard website which also exists because they do not properly transpose the left corner bracket) meet WP:COMMONNAME because the only one found in reliable sources is the full title.—
" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000554 | 0.000312 |
2005 (UTC)
20:31, 3 May | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
.. Was the uncle of soon to be mafia leader Jon Ameling.. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000032 | 0.000045 |
"
What is the publication date of the Yale source? Does it predate the 1963 law? Also the President-elect has been edited without citing any source to backup its ""strictly""...""cannot"" claim. Its original research without citation and should be rolled back accordingly unless this Yale cite suffices. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000011 |
Moving Guests to occupied rooms???
-'Because the hotel has infinite rooms, we can move any guest occupying any room n to room n+1, then fit the newcomer into room 1'.
No, we can't. Room n+1 is already occupied, as are all rooms by definition. Any room in the hotel has 'occupied' as descriptor, as per condition of the problem (' a hypothetical hotel with a countably infinite number of rooms, all of which are occupied '). So, whatever number we call any particular room (be it n+1, n+2, n+3 or any other), it does not change the room's 'occupied' status. Therefore, we can't move a guest from an occupied room to an occupied room to make room for more guests ) | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00003 | 0.000028 |
Ratinder Bal
Ratinder Bal | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
:Please don't ever think you are bothering me! I'm more than happy to answer your questions or to help you out in any other way. Fee free to ask. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
:Trivia? Do you mean the stuff about the thousands of camels and golden statues? Well, if it is unique among films, isn't it important to mention? | " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000016 |
Please remove the improper in the article; I refer to the line Kayla did this -she ******. I would appreciate it very much. My daughther use this resource on occasion. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000079 |
"
== Problem in intro ==
This is the 2nd paragraph, currently.
The implication here is that the USADA sanction needs to be ""ratified"" by the UCI. That's incorrect. There is no source for this, and I suggest because no source for that exists. The sanction is in effect immediately, as is indicated by Armstrong's inability to participate in officially sanctioned triathlons. The UCI needs to ratify nothing. It's true they have right to appeal, as does Armstrong, but without an appeal and an overturn by CAS, the USADA decision is it.
I suggest the following instead:
" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000021 | 0.000033 |
"
::Yes i suck at it. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.987411 | 0.00002 |
"
== Thanks! ==
...for reverting the latest attack on my user page. Appreciate the help! Best to you, " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.028192 |
If Andrić was a Serb this would all be redundant. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000174 | 0.00001 |
hahaha you're hilarious, bish. Btw can you blcok since he is obviously a sock of you-know-who. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000402 | 0.000013 |
:Sounds like a plan... | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
:BTW I just looked at the editing history of . I believe he is wikistalking me. He has already tried to declare my username illagel (reported at ANI), so I have ceased to assume good faith with his edits. He hasn't edited my second recent article, but has has tags on one of the main wikilinks in the lede of Chateau of Vauvenargues, i.e. on Bastide (Provençal manor) which is hardly something you find by accident given the cedilla. He seems to be making trouble for himself. Unlike him I will dig up a reference, which is not particularly hard. If you don't do anything about this, I know other administrators (who incidentally respect the privacy of emails without being asked). | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000018 | 0.000014 |
*Personally, I'm pleased with the way I arranged the tracklist and spent a considerable amount of time doing so. If the arrangement isn't suitable for Wikipedia or if there's a much nicer way of arranging it, be my guest. By the way, if you're seeing a bunch of blocks in the titles, it's Japanese and your browser isn't Japanese-capable. ;) Until there's an official English release that's faithful to the Japanese release (thus not needing a different tracklist for each version), I'm leaving the Japanese where it is so as to be accurate to the tracklist on the actual album.
I'm not trying to dictate control over this article, I'm just trying to convey why I did things the way I did. I stand firm by the information I put in this article, so please discuss before you make any significant changes to the info that's already been included. Thanks. - | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00012 | 0.000301 |
this project sux this site has no info i need | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000571 | 0.00001 |
Theres no such rule,go fuck yourself.Mamu ti jebem. | 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 1.00001 | 1.00001 |
==Third Largest Pharmaceutical Company==
This is a rather inaccurate statement. It doesn't have the third highest pharmaceutical sales it is only when you add in the material science and crop science business does this become anything close to accurate. Can we remove it? | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000013 | 0.000015 |
:I checked the Hoffman website and they don't seem to have made any announcement of it yet. If you contact them you could always ask them if they plan to make an announcement, so we could use it as a ref. - | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000011 |
Considering that this entire dispute was initiated by your personal attack on the motives of , hypocrisy is a better description and that hypocrisy belongs solely to you. As to what I've said, it's all documented above and on your posting history. You just don't like the fact that I've aired your dirty laundry and thrown a wrench in your little behind-the-scenes vote recruitment scheme. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.002742 | 0.000963 |
Which would be excellent if he wants to move to TNA | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
::: Lol Have you actually read what wrote?! I do not think so ... | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000022 | 0.018372 |
:Feel free to do so with all 140 or so hits on Compositio Mathematica. I was merely correcting the prominent style. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000014 | 0.000012 |
SARVPRIYE SONI, Student Of B.E CSE, Panjab University, Chandigarh
I request WikiPedians from WikiProject-Chandigarh to please help sorting out things here on this page.
I request all the WikiGnomes from WikiProject_India and WikiProject-Chandigarh to please save this page, as University Institute of engineering & technology is one of the prestigious Institutions of the country.SARVPRIYE SONI, Student Of B.E CSE, Panjab University, Chandigarh
SARVPRIYE SONI, Student Of B.E CSE, Panjab University, Chandigarh | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000013 | 0.000033 |
vulgar is a gradient. The vulgarity changes by locale, by context, and time (generally decreasing over time). While technically vulgar, bollocks is really tame. compared to say cocksucker, motherfucker, cunt. etc. Civility is certainly a pillar, but it is generally a goal, not enforced by policy unless lack of civility is becoming disruptive. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000122 | 0.001974 |
great idea for a guy with your background (disbarred weren't you? Hookers wasn't it?) to provoke them with comments like that. I get the feeling it will be you mentioned by name rather mr.wales next week. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000017 | 0.000017 |
"
:::Yes Scray, I agree with you. The magic word here is ""should"". We are not living in an ideal world. I wasn't born with an idea about cs. I have tried it a few years ago. Prior to it, my opinion was the same as yours, Zad's, Vsmith's, Alexrbn`s, Doc James's and other editors who didn't try it. I remember vividly that in the past I used to think that all alt med is crap, quack and it was including cs. If at that time I would edit an article about cs, I would act in the same way as the above mentioned editors. That is why I find it easy for myself to understand their motives. None of them spent any time adding information from PUBMED positive articles about cs, but they have invested their time in finding sources that discredit cs. Due to my observation, almost all people who actually try cs change their opinion about it. That is why I'm of opinion, that if the above mentioned editors will try it, they are highly likely get a shift in their worldview regarding it. They will find it difficult to write ""has no effect for any condition"", if they observed an actual effect on one of their conditions. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000045 | 0.000031 |
Racist? Witch! I'm not your new christian witch! | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000065 | 0.00001 |
:::: How to deflect attention from yourself 101: Report your own sockpuppet. We'll let a Checkuser sort this one out. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000485 | 0.00001 |
== That German-Canadian thing ==
A series of edits like this one remove a few words from the first sentence of this article. The editor(s) haven't brought it here to discuss, nor have they responded to messages on their talk pages. They don't use edit summaries. If they would share their rationale for the changes then we might make some progress but if they just keep removing it without explanation one starts to worry what is going on. I'm tending to restore the deleted text at the moment, but I wish that the editor(s) concerned would discuss it, or use the edit summary, or something. The encyclopaedia is supposed to work by collaboration, not just by editing as a soloist. Thanks and best wishes | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000012 | 0.000041 |
Good, but too long and exhausting. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
MONKEY B UTT SCRFATCHER MONKEY BUTT SCRATCH MONKEY BUTT SCRATCHER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 0.000064 | 0.00001 |
== Neutrality disputed ==
I added to several statements that clearly lack neutrality. One way to help improve this article would be to provide neutral sources for the claims (see WP:NPOV). As discussed above, that a reliable secondary source quotes a primary non-neutral claim does not create neutrality of the underlying claim, but only that the non-neutral claim was actually made. (e.g. advertising fluff in an interview or quoted from a press release). — | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000011 |
"
== Copyright problem removed ==
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://landi.it/layout.jsp?idz=10073&idtp;=151〈=3. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see ""using copyrighted works from others"" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or ""donating copyrighted materials"" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000016 |
PLEASE OH PLEASE DON'T BLOCK THE G-UNIT PAGE I BEGTH U SIR PLEASE KI JUST THINK G-UNIT IS BULLSHIT SO AS SOULJA BOY!!!! | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.022445 | 0.00032 |
"
: ""Please change X"" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form ""please change X to Y"". " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
== Pictures of penis sizes ==
Shouldn't we add picture of an average penis, a short penis and a long penis?
Like this one? | 1true
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 1.00001 | 0.966725 |
"
== Thanks for the laugh... ==
""(→User-reported - manually removing Evilblood4, who has already been blocked (suck it, bot!))"". / " | 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000011 |
== English pronunciation ==
Is there really an english pronunciation for his name? I think we just fucked his name up, but that doesn't make it correct. What makes sense to me is that boh-dah is the correct pronunciation, and lots of people mutilate his name - especially over in america. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000047 | 0.000311 |
:: PopCultureShock counts as mostly reliable, as best I can tell. They're a step up from being just a group blog about the same as T.H.E.M. Anime Reviews. Good job on the kanji titles now all we need is somone to transcribe to romanji (though that's not essential at first). And, as you say, English translations to come out. — | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000011 | 0.000033 |
:I have redone this article to actually state clearly that this is a diagnosis in alternative medicine. As the sections on diagnosis, treatment and actual signs and symptoms were not verifiable due to a lack of reliable sources I turn to other editors to supply these sources. The 153 references above are not themselves proof of how this condition should be diagnosed and treated. | | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000013 |
the latter two Unis Linguists maybe | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
This is not what discussions are for, | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
story or justification or “things he doesn't know/understand about this very complicated relationship,” you are a stalker. Normal relationships do not require logical contortions or insider knowledge. If you are engaging in activities that need elaborate justification, you are a stalker.
Further reading:
There, ah, isn't much. Did I mention that this is an underreported problem? But A Study of Women Who Stalk has some useful information to offer. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.106506 | 0.000641 |
"
::::OK Gerda, I am finished with 'Paul Speratus for a while. See what you think. '''''''''' " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
== Miss Dynamite ==
It has been years since you have no common sense with Miss Dynamite. Like I say, Miss Dynamite is well-known webcomic that does not fit with infamous singer so you need to restore this article to Miss Dynamite or remove this article otherwise it makes you look like a dolt. Busy? I think you are full of crap. I am not supporting dolty Wikipedians like you and founder. Not response backing and igroning are not mature that means lack of mature but more like childish with a kid-brain. No respect for Wikipedians. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.054639 | 0.004425 |
Bold text
== Media:Headline text == | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000712 | 0.00001 |
"
== Unchanged Burgers ==
The article says ""their trademark hamburgers are unchanged."" Recently, lettuce and tomato have been added and the patty has been made slightly thicker. I don't want to change this because of lack of proper citation." | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000012 | 0.000085 |
==Going Forward==
Here is the archived page which contains the history of the rewrite process with IP 71 as mediator. I respectfully request a lockdown of the stubbed article until there is agreement to move forward with a new mediator. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
Oh, and by the way I am not a some sick strange child that would not be disturbed by a real life murder scene. I am just your normal 14 year old girl doing a school assignment, who has a very weak stomach and thinks the entire Jack the Ripper case is digusting! | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.035433 | 0.00587 |
REDIRECT Talk:Humvee manufacturing in China | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
== File:Cleelumskiclub.jpg listed for deletion ==
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cleelumskiclub.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
::::::Thank you, sir. That was what I expected, but short of running it through a screen reader myself, I could not know with any certainty. Out of curiosity, what screen-reader software do you use? Is it widely used commercial software?
::::::Having provided a factual answer to my key question, would you care to opine on whether the structure of these section headers presents any real issues under WP:ACCESS? | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000024 |
==Deletion==
I have no idea if Jean Grimaldi is notable without a proper search, but there is enough context: a person with exact birth dates and distinctive career is sufficiently identified. I'''''' | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000011 | 0.000011 |
:I am not comprehending what you said. But the reason it is being deleted is because it is an infobox and it has no article characteristics to it. It is obviously not notable because the artist doesn't even have an article.
:There are the reasons for speedy deletion. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.001402 | 0.00002 |
"You've yet to give a response to my ""point"" so there's nothing for me to ""press"". We haven't had a substantive discussion about relevant issues since I responded to your initial post. You need to figure out what is or is not being disputed here and address the issue at hand. As it stands your citation demands are nonsensical. If you think I'm being unfair, please bring in an admin or arbitrator.
" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000422 | 0.000049 |
"
== Wikipedia is full of highly biased ultra-liberal homosexual and tranny freaks. ==
== Hi ==
If someday I go to the US, I'll marry with you D, of course you should came out first.
:Yeah Ryan.. or bruce, whatever your name is, you should consider accepting yourself before hating others. ( ]
:I'll shoot you in the head. By the way, I'm perfectly normal, a.k.a. ""straight."" That concept that most people who hate gays are secretly gay is a lie told by gays and gay supporters. I simply dislike gays because they are extremely disgusting. And stop calling me Bruce Jenner, you dumbasses. Over 52% the population of California, including me, dislikes fags." | 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 1true
| 0.999553 | 0.019291 |
Generals BAM and DOOG sucking each other ==
I have a video of the generals sucking dick and wacking off on Po's chest. Lets post it for the PESTS to wack it too, aight?
== | 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 0.999735 | 0.994627 |
:::::::::::MEM, I am not sure what you are saying here... are you suggesting that these broad INTERDICIPLINARY organizations are synonymous with EP? | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
== SAEEW ==
JKGDRSFJDSF MGSV XVVX VXVX BXBVBVXCVCVX CXBVXNGVSGSFGVSJHGVSBVXFCBVNSGRFNBVXGFV NBGXJNFGF GBJDFBVDF VBXC C BVCBVCVCGFDSGNFNGDNF BGUHNGDRFGNBDGFDJHNDFGHGDFNJVFGIDFJHVFGFJD JBVGFJDN | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000072 |
:::::On a final note, your WP:OWN attitude cost me half an hour of life. Instead of fending you off I could have written stubs for Sonstovka, , Dmitri Sonstov and what's not. Now I am pissed off, and fuck with this all. You may even post these Sonsov family page for deletion. -No.Altenmann | 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.999866 | 0.998726 |
== A magnetic field with a north and south pole? ==
To me, the lead sentence sounds as if a magnetic field with both a north and a south pole were something special, which is wrong. I admit that the phrasing of the source isn't better, but I think they mean the field has only two poles. Could that be clarified? | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000013 | 0.000013 |
"
well actually,there is some info on the newar connection besides dr thundy's article... abook on history of nepal by messrs bajracharya and co.there is also a book"" the todas"" by w.h.r rivers which connects todas to nairs and nambuthiris. there is also a book- "" a short history of kerala"" in which the author k.v.k ayyar connects nairs to the arrathas and bahlikas of the era of the mahabharatha...so some literary evidence exists and that aratta theory gives a lot of support to the scythian origin theory because the arratas were possibly a saka tribe
" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000024 | 0.000013 |
:In any case, just because Red Smoke may be a human being doesn't mean that we all of a sudden don't need sources in order to have a good article about him. You can't act as the exclusive source about yourself no matter who you are, and most people won't count as sources either. It's only people who're known to be reliable sources of information that can count as sources.
As for the 'it doesn't hurt anybody' argument, this is one that we tend to get a lot. But the problem is that the purpose of Wikipedia is to provide verifiable information; articles that don't have proper sourcing detract from this purpose. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000012 | 0.000012 |
"
==Speedy deletion of Olianna Portnoy==
A tag has been placed on Olianna Portnoy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ~ " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000013 |
==Grouping toys==
I just stumbled on the toys articles and boy is it a jumble of concepts! See Category talk:Toys. | | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
== Definition of capitalist state ==
under the list of communist states, and elsewhere, the article states or implies that a state in which the communist party has become intertwined with the government is a communist state.
I think this may mislead people, as nations like the US and UK are capitalist states, but don't have capitalist parties (bu name, at least)
Additionally, the article is by no means neutral and is extremely anti-communist. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000376 | 0.000733 |
"
== Requested move ==
== Requested move 5 September 2015 ==
:LDPR (political party) → – acorrding to the 28 january 2014 move, bd2412 misused it by renaming it his own version ""Political party LDPR"" althought the consensus clearly said that it was either, Political party LDPR"" or ""Liberal Democratic Party of Russia""Liberal Democratic Party of Russia"" " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000071 |
We did already have this discussion, and by far the vast preponderance of the peer reviewed sources, including essentially all of the WP:SECONDARY sources over the past five decades, agree that income distribution is a substantial influence in the direction of faster growth from greater income equality. Even in the heavily progressive Nordic economies, Atlas Shrugged-style strikes simply have never occurred. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000012 | 0.00003 |