comment_text
stringlengths 1
5k
| toxic
class label 2
classes | severe_toxic
class label 2
classes | obscene
class label 2
classes | threat
class label 2
classes | insult
class label 2
classes | identity_hate
class label 2
classes | prediction_hate
float64 0
1
| prediction_nsfw
float64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
How do I help?]])
The IP has the right to blank his talk page.
:He does have the right to, but why? He wasn't getting block warnings or anything. However, you are right. -Connor ( | | [[Special:Contributions/WorldTraveller101| | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000011 | 0.000013 |
Storr|Old Man of Storr]] | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
Hi Breadandroses, I'm still working on it but have been a little busy on other things. Hoping to have some working copy in the next week or so to post. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
==Block Notice==
Hi,
This account has been indefinitely blocked as a vandalism-only account. Best wishes, | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
Stupidest Thing Disney Has ever done
Hannah Montana is a pointless show that is stupider than the Regular Show on Cartoon Network. | 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 0.000011 | 0.000023 |
"Information about the stink prank product Liquid ASS should be added to the article about stink bombs. The article mentions another product, Fart Spray, by name and alludes to another product (fart bombs).
I added information to the article regarding Liquid ASS along with a link to the site (see Liquid ASS). However, the administrator deleted it. He explained that the outside link did not meet Wikipedia external links guidelines (which I had read beforehand). In my opinion, an external link to Liquid ASS falls within the guidelines since the Liquid ASS web site contains information on use (see Liquid ASS Suggested Uses) and testimonials from users (see Liquid ASS Testimonials). I checked the ""Links to be Avoided"" and found no criteria there that would cause me to think an external link to Liquid ASS would be inappropriate.
No explanation was given for removing the two sentences altogether that I added about Liquid ASS, which are as follows:
Another stink prank product, Liquid ASS , comes in a small bottle and is applied to objects with a fine stream by squeezing the bottle. Since Liquid ASS does not use sulfur, it has a genuine smell of feces and road-kill.
I also find it interesting that the method of applying Liquid ASS is the same as that as used by Who Me. Does Liquid ASS smell as bad, also (or worse)? Sounds like a good assignment for the administrator since this topic apparently falls within his area of expertise.
" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.003739 | 0.002376 |
REDIRECT Talk:Tragedy and Hope | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
::I won't try to convert you. -) I will continue to be cautious about switching from info to geo. Thanks for adding a map recently to Wallowa Lake State Park. Do you mind if I make the switch in the fossil beds article if I'm careful to retain all of the information that's in the infobox. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000012 | 0.000019 |
":To address the points one by one:
:* The Palmer quote was originally just ""filthy animal poison""; this was criticized for being out of context so more context was added and it's now a longer quote. Apparently this is not the context that was desired, so what exactly is meant by the criticism that the Palmer quote is ""out of context""?
:* I don't see why the Palmer quote is ""gratuitous"". It provides motivation for chiropractic's early strong opposition to vaccination. We can't expect the casual reader to be familiar with this motivation.
:* I was originally opposed to putting the Kansas data in on the grounds that it wasn't published in a refereed journal, but Fyslee liked it on the grounds that it is a reliable source. Fyslee talked me into it so I put it in. I disagree that the Kansas data is ""cherry-picking""; it's the most recent survey we have and its results are not hugely different from other surveys. However, it does appear to be two editors to one right now, so for now I removed it. We can revisit this issue if Fyslee chimes in again.
:* While it's true that statistics can be manipulated, these statistics (except for the Kansas data) are taken from reliable reviews, not from primary sources. When reliable reviews are reporting numbers, I don't see why the Wikipedia article should settle for vaguer statements.
:* As mentioned above the article could use reorganization, but that's a big project; for now many chiropractors do argue against the effectiveness of vaccines (unlike most other skeptics, who focus on safety) so this is the most plausible location for the material now.
:* Mentioning other CAM professions would be welcome, obviously supported by a reliable source. I suggest the Ernst 2001 source mentioned above.
:
" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000026 |
Deleting admin's note: this has been found to be a copyright violation as well. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
==Louisville Courier-Journal==
No love expressed in Essjay's hometown newspaper. ""On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog."" " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00034 | 0.000328 |
|Argentina=yes |USA=yes |SanJose=Mid | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000014 |
"
== Editing while logged out ==
WinEuro, consider this your only warning for editing while logged out. Further socking will result in a block. While policy allows you to do so under certian circumstances, you may not at any time edit while logged out to avoid scrutiny or to further your attempts to edit an article to your preferred version. Best, " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000051 | 0.000061 |
:Get out of my head! =) | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000047 | 0.000012 |
===Dogg===
Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000011 | 0.00001 |
s
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinksvAnemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinksAnemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinksAnemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinksAnemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinksAnemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinksAnemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinksAnemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinksAnemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinksAnemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone Projectors stinks
Anemone P | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 1.00001 | 0.804842 |
have sex with plushies | 1true
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 1.00001 | 0.000127 |
scale disclosure where multiple patients are affected. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
== Edit request from Vinayagamani, 20 May 2010 ==
regarding the awards she got 2 maharastra state award z cine award iifa award
she got dinakaran award , vikatan award virtuso award | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00002 | 0.000023 |
Oh, I also take 1000% responsibility. I am a worthless piece of shit that should be lynched and killed. | 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 1true
| 1true
| 0false
| 1.00001 | 0.063562 |
"
:Thank you M4rd...thanks for listening to the other side unlike some people who are stubborn and listen with the intent to reply ""not understand"". Btw I'm going to make the changes...and revise it...if you agree." | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.032419 | 0.000853 |
:::Please stop making long arguments like this without thinking about whether you and the other person are saying the same thing. It may be that Pbhj is saying that the Dukedom of York was superior in time, not in precedence. It would be polite to ask rather than to assume. - | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
::::Recipes for the kitchen that can never have enough cooks. What would go on the meta- pages? Metarecipes: ""needs more salt, idiot. You can't believe anything in this book."" Or, ""This recipe should be deleted because no one outside of Leidsche Rijn Vinex near Utrecht actually eats this crap."" And metacommentary: Not like that, use two hands! Not so high, you're going to burn it. Can't you slice any faster? We're running low on bread crumbs. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.441068 | 0.005852 |
"
== December 2008 ==
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.
:If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings." | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000012 | 0.000144 |
: Hello Komitsuki, I responded to your comment at . Please check the message, and feel free to comment. Thanks, - | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
== Re:RMS Titanic ==
I enjoyed your comment on the revert for the RMS Titanic article. ) Since your interests include Titanic, how does the article changes made so far look? | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000011 | 0.000059 |
"
== What is and isn't a tribe? ==
I think this article needs to better describe what a tribe actually means, and in particular what sorts of groups or societies are or are not tribes. It also needs to better explain what the objections to using the word ""tribe"" are. I have a dictionary that defines the word tribe, but gives a caveat on the usage that:
:''In historical contexts the word tribe is broadly accepted ( ‘the area was inhabited by Slavic tribes’), but in contemporary contexts it is problematic when used to refer to a community living within a traditional society. It is strongly associated with past attitudes of white colonialists towards so-called primitive or uncivilized peoples living in remote undeveloped places. For this reason it is generally preferable to use alternative terms such as community or people.
However, I've also seen people object to the use of ""tribe"" do describe such ancient societies, claiming ""they weren't tribes, they were kingdoms"" (this was in reference to Germanic rather than Slavic tribes I think - I don't know if that makes any difference). In summary, I'm unclear of the meaning of the word if ""tribe"", and the objections to it are because:
:a) It is a meaningful word, but not considered ""politically correct"" due to association with colonialist attitudes
:b) It is a meaningful word, but often gets misused to describe things that are not tribes
:c) It has no consistent meaning, and doesn't tell you anything useful about groups so described
:d) Something else
:e) Some or all of the above
" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000453 | 0.000357 |
"
Hey Nightbeast, I just wanted to congratulate you on getting past the dispute on America's Army and becoming a productive contributor. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000036 | 0.000017 |
::::::: I've moved the Economist piece down to the report it deals with. The other two discuss the controversy - it appears the Economist is only discussing the Russel report. I also question - Newsweek and the NYT get one sentence with one quote each when they say something, why did you provide three sentences and two quotes to The Economist saying something? After EC - that's an opinion piece and should not be weighted equally to editorials. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000028 |
:[copied over from where he keeps censoring anything he doesn't like]
:> and consider anyone who pronounces 'Amharic' with æ in English to be an ignorant idiot
:wikt:prescriptivist. You're welcome. — | 1true
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 1.000007 | 0.006101 |
"
::: I think Hannah Montana 2 / Meet Miley Cyrus is fine. As for Bionic, it is completely different because that is just the styling of the word, and following Wikipedia:Article titles. Also, yes, let's wait multiple days. I'll notify some users. * " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000012 | 0.000013 |
"
: Not done for now: It is not clear what you are requesting. If you would like an image added to an article, please first have it uploaded, you can request that here: WP:FFU,after the file you want is uploaded, you can re-request the edit here, please form it in a ""Please change XYZ to ABC. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00002 |
:::Mr. Bradley seems to have built up quite a track record as a vandal editor and seems intent on increasing his score, regarding his interaction with Wikipedia as some sort of misguided power game, demonstrating little competence in either encyclopaedic knowledge or quality of contribution. Wikipedia is, inevitably, a sort of playin field for such egos. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.001113 | 0.000048 |
Tabloid partisan crap what it is, we have no remit to report it. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.523405 | 0.000013 |
== Verity Long-Droppert at AfD ==
Verity Long-Droppert has been taken to AfD and I note no one has bothered to inform you despite you being the page creator. It's at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Verity Long-Droppert if you're interested. Best, | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000011 | 0.000087 |
"
:Well, I guess you just can't handle yourself, because you just accused someone of propaganda again. You're blocked for 3 days. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000606 | 0.000014 |
EDIT To be honest,looking through the films now, I'm not even sure if Leticia Ortiz is real, she's always credited as Letty and she is shown in the FBI database as Letty, Ortiz. Poeple seem to love making up fan names, they add them to the wikia for the particular subject and then people take that as gospel. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000018 | 0.000078 |
"
:Hello. The article is already semi-protected (as you can see from the multiple ""edit protected"" requests above). " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000012 | 0.00001 |
:In the novel, it is noted that Vito pulled strings to make sure Michael made it to Officer Candidate School, and was given a combat posting in the Pacific (to avoid family conflicts). This was part of Vito's overall plan for Michael to eventually enter politics, rather than the 'family business'. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000012 |
"
== FAR ==
Thanks, hopefully I survive the upcoming bloodbath FAR. ''' (') " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000397 |
==really==
if you must move things around on a whim, at least check for double redirects (such as Template:Iran, look at Medes, for example). It would be even nicer if you went with wikiquette and checked with people before moving things, of course. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
As a compromise, I've moved down RhinoMind's image and replaced it with a different high-quality close-up of a Danish. I see no references for the suggestion that a kanelstang, chokoladesnegle or brunsvier are defined as Danish pastries, and there's even a lonely croissant in there.
And I still believe that this particular image does not work well as illustration due to its poor composition. The individual pastries are jumbled and angled so that few distinctive marks or shapes can be discerned. Overall, the lighting makes them all blend together into a single light-brown mass. It's not a good photo, no matter how much variation it shows. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000014 | 0.000072 |
"Another: The name of Johann Heinrich von Bernstorff is misspelled ""Bernstorf"".
" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
::An issue relevant to the article is whether Russians themselves are involved in looting, just allied militias, but v=UKtOOaNjMys this video is said to contradict that. I don't know Russian, so can't comment on what is being said here. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000038 | 0.000143 |
, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
..*Driving to France was a damn long drive... But I understand what you mean. 21:36 | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000011 |
"
:::::::::Where's there requirement for the VAW category that sources must say the act was misogyny for it to be used? Oh.. there isn't one. Sounds like BoboMeowCat has a different, and much narrower inclusion category for the VAM category. How about we make a deal. You can start first by cleaning up the VAW category to meet the equivalent threshold, and then you can come back here and make that case that a reliable source use the term ""misandry."" " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000041 |
WALLACE AND GROMIT IS AN EVIL MIND CONTROL GROUP WHICH IS SLOWLY CURSING ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I FEEL MORE LIKE A RABBIT EACH NIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I WILL EVENTUALLY TRANSFORM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I AM BEING SERIOUS,I AM NOT JOKING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THIS IS NOT VANDALISM,THIS IS MY EXPERIENCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.997758 | 0.808356 |
::::The pharmacist who made the remedy isn't concerned with whether there are molecules in this level of potency or not. Its the ***potency*** that is relevant and intended, not the molecules. So, the pharmacist did not itend there to be a molecule in there, just as was the case at every other potency.
::::Accuracy matter to the readership, the curreent one is inaccurate, why not just remove that part that is inaccurate? To say you judge that I can tell an untruth here because it won't matter to our readers is not what the spirit of wiki is about. Your last point is irrelevant.
:::: | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000824 | 0.000162 |
It is the only sign with a clearly human, female character. The rest are much more conceptual or animals. This is perhaps not worth mentioning though, aside from the fact that Virgo is so strongly associated with the Feminine for this reason. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000132 | 0.000022 |
"
::::::There's a minor problem with that - was the event\topic truly notable when it was deemed to be so? It seems the NTEMP idea has been either ignored or refined in some ares, primarily withers of reality TV shows. Yes, it ""notable"" but so notable as to justify bio articles.
::::::And there is also a nagging question: Is the inclusion because the event was indeed someone that patterned themselves after the Joker or the reporters assumed the connection. If it's the former, then it's likely that there will be grounds for the ""see also"". If its the latter and the link is all but dropped in the ongoing coverage it isn't notable for this article.
::::::- " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000011 | 0.000121 |
"
:::::I still disagree with leaving the sentence as is. I have no issue with leaving the ""Austrian/Ron Paul type"" label that Krugman uses to criticize Schiff, but Krugman is making a generalization here that leaves the reader no other interpretation than to accept Krugman's premise and conclusion. Because A, ergo B. If we use just the label ""economist"" for Krugman and do not identify the branch of theory that he identifies with, it would give undue weight to his criticism of Schiff and his Austrian economic leanings because the lead for the Schiff article does not describe Schiff as a trained economist whereas Krugman is a professional economist writer. So to use the earlier analogy, if Krugman's view of the Austrian school can be boiled down to Because A, ergo B, then Austrians may view the Krugman premise as Because A, ergo C. In otherwords, Krugman says Austrians are wrong and Austrians view their position as correct. Hence, if we accept the disparaging context of Krugman's label and reproduce it verbatim in the Schiff article, it must be prefaced giving context to Krugman's self described leanings. To allay 's concern that Krugman does not consider himself a Keynesian, I performed a google search for ""krugman keynesian"" and looking at several of the top five results would strongly imply that Krugman holds a Keynesian worldview. Here a couple that I was able to glean: I April 25, 2012 - The Big Wrong - ""And now the results are in: Keynesians have been completely right, Austerians utterly wrong — at vast human cost."" II April 25, 2012 - WHY AREN’T WE ALL KEYNESIANS YET? - "" I have often wondered why Keynes - unlike, say, Freud - has never become a pop cultural icon."" I will reiterate this point again; since the Schiff article identifies John Maynard Keynes as an opponent of Schiff's, and since Krugman seems to identify with Keynes, ergo prefacing Krugman's criticism of Schiff and all the ""Austrian/Ron Paul types"" by using the label ""Keynesian economist"" is both descriptive and balanced. I see no evidence in wikipedia or wikitionary to show keynesian as a generally accepted derisive term; I can see that it may be derisive among those who hold an opposing economic view either as an adherrent to an opposing school or informally by not accepting Keynesian implications on government policies. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000018 | 0.000028 |
what? you're an idiot \ | 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 1.00001 | 0.999774 |
== Spammer warning ==
A spammer is citing this article to trick potential suckers into sending money to a 419 scam. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00003 | 0.000018 |
*Since edit warring on this article has been going on for some time, those editors who have most often been involved in reverting have been banned from continuing to edit it. This act impacts your account as well as two others and a group of IPs. More information can be seen at the administrators' noticeboard listing (permanent link). Of course, it does not prevent your editing the talk page to join in consensus discussions about the development of the article. As time goes on and editors engage in dispute resolution without additional problems, this restriction may be lifted. It is not meant to endorse any particular version of the article, but only to avoid continuous overriding of content, which is an inappropriate means of resolving disputes. If the problem continues, the next step may be to block editors involved or shut down the article for further editing. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000049 | 0.00003 |
And if property taxes fall, as in a recession, as in 2008 - 2010? | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000047 | 0.00001 |
"
::::Thanks. ) " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
:Also, the plastic flags that I have are very similar to this photo and to this photo. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
::No. Please read WP:FRINGE. This is getting to be disruptive.
" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
== Official name ==
This has been discussed twice before, but anyway, my next attempt. Timor-Leste is the English name of this country in the same way that Côte d'Ivoire is the English name of Côte d'Ivoire. East Timor is, just like Ivory Coast for Côte d'Ivoire, one of the former names of the country. Confer this, this or this. I propose moving the article to Timor-Leste; the government and people of Timor-Leste apparently want to be referred to by that name. — | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000016 | 0.000012 |
== Poorly written article ==
This article is poorly written, especially in the intro.
The intro sentence contains a lot of technical information, capital letters, parentheses, detail about magnitude, etc, but does not mention that 184 people were killed. This is poor writing technique. The intro should use simple language to convey the gist of the article without being too technical. Technical information should come later.
I am a professional editor and would re-write the article myself, but unfortunately I do not have time at the moment. Perhaps somebody else could have a crack? | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000015 | 0.000141 |
":::Hi Giggy! Puny 'shonen post pile of new feedback here. 'Zilla famous for gumption, helpfulness, sweet temper, atomic deathray, and sex. Weenie 'shonen famous for only one thing: meanness. -( '''' .
" | 1true
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000072 |
"::::""So far the evidence does not support your claims."" Does your web site prove that Anti-Semitic motifs are typical of Anti-Zionist propaganda ? No, because this site makes a selection.
::::""but to reflect facts."" You take a PoV as a fact.
" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000144 | 0.000027 |
WP:VPT#AutoComplete – forms
* | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
threat from the Idiot Vandal Gorgonzolla | 1true
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 0.806528 | 0.000011 |
"
:Slut is just a word and like any words, it's the context in which it's used that's important, not the word itself. And the context the article provides isn't pejorative. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000047 |
"
==== Silk cape====
It looks like Peta has a formal policy statement objecting to all silk used for any clothing: . That is broader than a single ""spider silk cape"" incident. So that appears to be a major policy position that should be mentioned in the article. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000011 | 0.000027 |
"
:Thank you. Now fixed. • " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
::::::::::::You have shown no such thing as the clear majority of contributors involved in this discussion can attest. You have wasted a lot of peoples time by failing to listen to other peoples arguments, by contradicting literature and by providing no literature in support of your own opinions, in a way very similar to disruptive trolling. If it is such a bother to you to waste our time, then please dont bother anymore. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.003783 | 0.000361 |
*UUUUM a-he lets take this from the beginning
Mariah Carey(debut): US: not 9 but almost 10 million in us (almost 1 decade has passed since its last certification)
EU: around 2 million
rest of america including canada): abou 2.5 million
Asia: about 2 milllion
rest of charting countries+sales through years= 1-1.5 million
total= 17.5-18 million copies worldwide since 1990
with almost the same way of thinking anyone can agree that her sales are about:
Mariah Carey: 17.5-18 million
Emotions:14.5-15 million (or something like that)
Mtv unplugged: about 15 million (approximately)(other sales figures4this album could b 13-14m.)
Music Box: 30 m.+++
merry Christmas:16+
daydream:25-26m.
Butterfly:17-17.5m.
#1s:18.5million+++
Rainbow:11-12 mill.
Glitter:5ml.+
Greatest Hits:bout5m.
Charmbarcelet:6m.+
The Remixes: 1m.+++
The Emancipation of mimi:11 million+++
(i hope her nxt album will sell over 25 million with at least 4 #1s)
So reidlos just stop it ok
Nick322 | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000016 | 0.000107 |
:::This is disputed, but I think this may be some controversy to some Christians, but not me though. Is always said Jesus is the Son of God, and Mary is known as Virgin Mary or simply Mary. Saying Jesus is born out of wedlock actually insults God and many Christians. It is always said that God sent Jesus down to earth and put him into Mary's womb, and she married Joseph, therefore he is Jesus' father. Taking facts of the Bible will be the best. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000194 | 0.000512 |
When are you dunb fuck, idiots going to learn that I dont give a fuck about your dumb fucking policies! SUCK MY DICK!
I will continue to vandalize the same user pages until you chicken shit, pussy, queers quit fucking with my legitimate edits on skyline chili and Middletown, Indiana | 1true
| 1true
| 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 1.00001 | 1.00001 |
:I appreciate anyone I can have strongly felt disagreements with and continue to respect: especially when the reason for that respect is their respect of due and appropriate process. I need to watch my mule like tendencies when I start to feel heated, they make me look like an ass at times. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.007342 | 0.001665 |
make those kickass userboxes | 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
::Thanks. It started yesterday (I think) and is someone who wants to be a WoW vandal. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000014 |
:Oh, Jesus Fucking Christ - grow up and quit ur bellyaching. It's a wiki, gofixit.
: | 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.999642 | 0.842282 |
"| decline = No new username selected, clear intent to continue writing about company. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
==reasonable woman==
regarding sexual harassment and the vulnerability of women:
either provide a citation to support the text in the article, or kindly remove the text. as this is presumably a matter that has received non-trivial attention in the last 2 decades in the US, a citation ought not be difficult to find, if in fact the information given is correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by
I back this. This concept seems very, very controversial, and I've personally never encountered it. It needs to either be cited, and properly contextualised as outré, or removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by
==legal fiction==
Concerning ""a legal fiction""; were I the original author, I might choose to open the article with a tone less aggressive and more informative to the layperson. ""Legal fiction"" is a term of art. I don't believe it should be the ""definitional headline."" It is; however, accurate. Restatement (Second) of Torts §283 comment c (1965) (""The reasonable man is a fictitious person, who is never negligent, and whose conduct is always up to standard."") In Vaughan v Menlove (1837) 132 ER 490 the ""legal fiction"" is implied. First, when the jury was instructed that the defendant was required to have acted as a ""prudent man"" would have acted under those circumstances. And then under review, the directive was deemed too vague. Further, it was determined that a defendant acting honstly and bona fide to the best of his own judgement would afford no rule at all and leave open infinitely variable individual judgement. Nuance aside, the foundation for the ""legal fiction"" for the basis of comparison exists. The ""reasonable person"" is a fact assumed or created by courts.
To eliminate the ""citation needed"" might I suggest:
* Bedder v Director of Public Prosecutions [1954] 1 WLR 1119 (where ""reasonable man"" is deemed a wholly impersonal fiction to which no special characteristic of the accused should be attributed)
* Camplin [1978] A.C. 705 (a reasonable man ""means an ordinary person of either sex, not exceptionally excitable or pugnacious, but possessed of such powers of self control as everyone is entitled to expect that his fellow citizens will exercise in society as it is today"")
* R v Smith (2000) 4 AER 289 (citing Champlin and Bedder: a preasonable man ""is a person having the power of self-control to be expected of an ordinary person of the sex and age of the accused, but in other respects sharing such of the accused's characteristics as they think would affect the gravity of the provocation to him; and that the question is not merely whether such a person would in like circumstances be provoked to lose his self-control but also whether he would react to the provocation as the accused did"")
That said, I maintain that a citation is of modest benefit if not entirely unnecessary. From conceptual inception, the question has never been ""is the 'reasonable person' fictional?"" I submit the question has always been, 'Is a reasonable person defined in accordance with a particular normative ethical commitment or in accordance with an empirically observed practice or perception?' I posit that a reasonable person, possessed of minimal education, should have little difficulty exploring the nature of ""legal fiction"" (given the link) were they so inclined.
:WP:BOLD " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000388 | 0.000256 |
" — Preceding unsigned comment added by •
" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
:Looks out of place indeed. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
By the way, whilst I agree with much of what you say there wasn't a tremendous growth in ""christianity"" until after things started to be written about ""jesus"" some 2 generations later. (At that time average life expectancy was 28 - the earliest gospels were written mid 60s.... Jospehus in 94..... A biographical article should be ""Criminal"" court sound whilst the ""beleif"" article should contain the guesswork, interpretations and mythical elments. I think it's wrong that the Histoicity is separated off rrather than the ""faith"" POV. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000025 | 0.000029 |
I have from the outset (I think I was the first to note it) suggested 98% is open to WP:OR challenges. You don't need to convince me on this that there is a legitimate problem there. I personally think this is all provisory work: I know of scholarly analyses now underway which will be peer-reviewed precisely on these questions, and available in some months. I prefer what scholars tell me, months afterwards, than what newspapers say in the heat of events. In the meantime we have our problem. But I think your objection to Thrylos's graph somewhat forced. Very many sources agree that June to November 4 marked an almost total shut-down of rocketing from Gaza. To insist on the whole lull period has an advantage, for the rockets at the end once added, make blur one's recognition of the demonstrated fact that, even if it is OR, between June and Nov.4, rocket attacks underwent a 95%+ reduction. Perhaps I am not a good wiki editor. But for an historian, who would do what Thrylos did, this point warrants mention, and clarity. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000011 | 0.000024 |
::Assuming bad faith of your fellow editors (i.e., assuming they don't know what they're doing) isn't a valid excuse for committing vandalism. — | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000022 | 0.000011 |
2011 (UTC)
::this sounds like general Communist chinese porpaganda more then anything. and even if we did do so, china would still own us around $11 trillion, as we gave them billions of dollars in the 1940s after world war 2 in a system similar to the marshall plan. 23:32, 12 March | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000091 | 0.00007 |
feel your pain. Can't have people running around with more then the minumum standard. Yes e know its in the rules but still - minimum just doesnt do it for the most of us | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000011 | 0.000163 |
Swaminarayan Page
Hi, I deleted the link because it would be impossible to add all the temple locations in the article. If you feel the link has capital importance, please discuss on the Swaminarayan talk page. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000011 |
== I was involved in a lot of articles surrounding Canwest: how exactly did this senior wiki editor restrict the canwest article. Sock puppet. Double standard. Hypocrites. ==
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bwilkins To haida chieftain, You're a disruptive troll. You're actions are embarrassing, and not at all encyclopedic. I was involved in a lot of articles surrounding Canwest - you know NOTHING. Take your soapbox and start a blog somewhere - www.thesmokinggun.com or some crap like that. Embarrasment. Yours truly, Suck puppet Bwilkins. | 1true
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.978936 | 0.079774 |
Your observations are consistent with those of most imbeciles.;- | 1true
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
This article should not be deleted under Section 7 as it contains material of importance in musical theater and general theater, and material pertinent to current British theater productions. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
: - completed on [ 18:34, 26 March 2011]. '''''' " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
:Ah, thanks for letting me know. If that's the case, then you're right, but I've no idea how to do a history merge. Best I can do, I think, is restore the Draft so that someone else can merge it, and I've now done that. Perhaps ask at WP:AN for someone who can do the merge? | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000011 |
:'Glad I could help... all in the course of a normal RC patrol ) | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000024 |
", 7 February 2008 (UTC)
::::::That's ridiculous. Google hits are not a particularly interesting metric, and ""Super Duper Tuesday"" is idiotic and juvenile. NO ONE calls it that except a few news people trying to make their show stand out. As for the others GIVE ME A FREAKING BREAK. This junk, especially sitting at the top of the article, HARMS THE ARTICLE. It reduces its sense. It makes it harder for Wikipedia users none of whom are ever going to be looking for ""Tuesday of Destiny"" to find actual information in it. 21:54" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.046327 | 0.000072 |
boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob boob | 1true
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.001624 | 0.429712 |
"
:Just saw the movie a second time. You're right: Parajumper is the term used. Also, the movie never gives Sharon's last name — she's referred to as ""Agent 13"" and as ""Sharon."" I know Feige called her ""Sharon Carter"" at a press event once, but in terms of what the movie says, ""Carter"" is not given. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000143 | 0.000041 |
== Lib Dems ==
please stop that partisan troll ToryBoy from deleting citations over and over again.
I've been monitoring the page and he does it every day without fail, even removing half dozen citations.
Surely he should have been warned/banned by now? I've been reprimanded for less. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000097 | 0.000756 |
"This is GREAT work. There was one ""Catholic Church"" near the end that seemd to be RCC, if it wasn't I don't understand what was meant. If the ""Roman"" I added is incorrect, than that sentence needs to be clarified.
Now, can it all be cited? If it can't the whole lot of it will have to be excised when we push for GA and that would be a crime! Well done.
" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000053 | 0.000041 |
::Wait, you're Roger Schlafly? Holy crap. Um...hi. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 1.00001 | 0.995532 |
::The garage is in a very small town. Some day I will get a photo, but it's really out of the way to anywhere. He had more than one hanger outside of town. One that looks much like the one in the photo is at the Fillmore County History Museum. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000011 | 0.00004 |
:No, never has been. City status is given by royal charter, and in Rochester's case predates the CoE by the best part of a millenium. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |