comment_text
stringlengths
1
5k
toxic
class label
2 classes
severe_toxic
class label
2 classes
obscene
class label
2 classes
threat
class label
2 classes
insult
class label
2 classes
identity_hate
class label
2 classes
prediction_hate
float64
0
1
prediction_nsfw
float64
0
1
== == This image is the flag of a county. Flags of governments are public images. This should not have been deleted. Now several pages have redlinks in place of the image.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.000035
"::::LOL I really didn't realize all the subtext with these naming conventions. I can't believe how I missed ""Flow"", for now what seems like an apparent euphemism. The nomenclatures do seem to be getting worse. We should totally have a page about this on Meta! "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000011
0.000013
for the reply. So if a reputable source comes out with the name its OK to bring the article back?
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.00001
==rewrite== thanks for the extension, Hier0phant, it's an interesting read; since your reference is not very accessible, I guess we'll have to take your word that all your info was taken from Belaj.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000062
0.000015
:I make it 24 cards higher and 24 lower than 8, so assuming the draw is random both should be equally likely.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00008
0.00001
" ::Sometimes eras don't exactly coincide with calendars. It's not too late for the millennium! The single sentence from the ""millenarian appeal"" section that seems the most relevant is this: ::*Sociologist James V. Downton wrote that the millennarian appeal of the DLM prior to the festival sprang from a belief that Guru Maharaj Ji was the Lord, and that a new age of peace would begin under his leadership. ::But I'm not sure that we can add just that without adding additional caveats abd verbiage, which may get us back to where we were. ::Regarding Wavy Gravy, I'm fine either way. ::As for the headings, the article is basically divided into three parts: before, during, and after. The middle part was titled ""Event"". How about ""The Festival""? "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.000024
Also, the navigation bar doesn't seem to work on the old URL.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.00001
" ::Actually, it's not universally accepted that there was one single person from whom all humans are descended. Alternative hypotheses include that there was a small group of contemporaneous ancestors, none of whom is ancestor to all of us. (See, e.g., this: ""all modern humans descended from the same small group of people"".) "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.002707
0.000011
==April 2006== Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. This is regarding the article Michael Moore and Walter Chrysler
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.00001
" ::Alternatively, to maintain the limerick's meter: ""The poor little bastard was dead."" "
1true
0false
0false
0false
1true
0false
0.020654
0.000228
" ::Not this morning, either! ;) Yer rightthe list would be ridiculously long. But WP is in its infancy. The list will grow. Eventually, it would be an incredibly useful resource to people. Setting the bar so high (a comprehensive list) means it'll never happen. I take the long view of WP and say, ""If you build it the information will come."" Might take 25 years, but WP can wait. Have a nice sleep, Satu. Wuz procrastinating: I need some coffee and have to do some tax work. "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000602
0.000335
::I'm sure you are sick of this but check this nonsense out on Kara5386. This person just wont stop, it's rather comical.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.96186
0.000011
" == Please resist the urge to spin == As a gay gamer who has been playing video games since the 1976 Fairchild, I can say that I have been FAR from impressed with the representation of gay identity in video gaming. I can tolerate ridiculous stereotypical depictions of gay folk, but what is worse is the systematic censorship. Classifying mere gay identity as ""mature/sexual/adult"" is one way of enabling retailers like Wal-Mart to de-gay their shelves and content creators to de-gay their products, citing sales concerns. It is patently discriminatory to act as if being openly gay is ""more sexual"" than being openly hetero, yet people blithely accept this double-standard all the time. While there isn't much news coverage to be found about this, the Christian Right is driving quite a bit of this. Their scare tactics routinely include trying to convince parents that gays are after their children. Having openly gay characters in video games, especially when they're not villains and fools, is a threat to their system of using us as pawns in their quest for power. The Sims proved people wrong who declared ""only hetero males play video games"". Besides, it's a self-fulfilling prophecy to make products designed to appeal to the taste of one demographic and proclaim that others simply have no interest in gaming in the first place. It's quite convenient. How much of this dearth of gay content (and I don't mean token content) is due to the fact that most developers are heterosexual men? So, please resist the urge to spin the history of gays-in-gaming as being much rosier than it is. Even The Sims titles censor us, making us ""convert"" people into homosexuals (a very offensive thing to force a gay person to do, let me tell you) and force characters into romantic interactions. A token non-foolish non-evil gay character here and there does not equate to an industry in which people like myself truly feel there are products that are non-narrow. And, frankly, the phrase ""the pink dollar"" itself is rather offensive. The money I earn is green. When I touch it it doesn't transform due to ""the gay"". Historically-minded folks may also want to remember that pink was the color for boys and blue was the color for girls in the 19th century. I would hope that developers will start seeing an end to heterosexism and homophobia as being more about creative freedom than cash."
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.012205
0.000902
BTW, Tomas. You've been doing a stellar job with your category work and new article creation. Lots of good stuff and content in areas that have been sorely needing attention. /
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000046
0.000011
" ==1% (South Park)== Hi. Regarding your edits to 1% (South Park), please do not rearrange the plot summary, as there is no reason for A-plot and B-plot to be summarized separately. Care should be taken to provide them in a way that mirrors how they occurred concurrently as much as possible. Also *""Fifth Graders"" is not a proper noun. *""This incites Butters and Jimmy, and an angry group of Fifth Graders with an idea"" is wrong. Butters and Jimmy came up with one idea, and the fifth graders came up with a different one. *Regarding the passage ""Despite being at Token's house, mistaking a concerned Stan, Kyle, and Kenny as the killers, the real killer manages to get inside and proceeds to put Muscle Man Marc in boiling water. Finding Rumper Tumpskin, Cartman is forced to watch his toy's head blown off by the culprit, Cartman's doll Polly Prissypants. "" two points: First, it is only necessary to summarize the plot. All we need to inform the reader is that more of Cartman's toys are being destroyed. We do not need to emphasize specific details about the mutilations. This is why the previous summary is more streamlined. Second, you mention Rumper Tumpskin and Muscle Man Marc, without explain who or what they are. Given the number of varied non-human and fantasy characters that appear in the series, you can't assume that readers know who these people are. This is another reason why just saying, ""Despite being at Token's house, Cartman discovers Muscle Man Marc and Rumper Tumpskin, two more of his toys, destroyed, with the remaining one, a doll named Polly Prissypants, sitting in an armchair with a revolver, claiming responsibility for all the toy 'murders'."" is simpler and better. It explains to the reader what is happening in a direct, and to-the-point manner. Thanks. "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00026
0.000251
" == Misspelling == Nightrain seems to have been misspelled on the original record.... On my appetite for destruction vinyl, which is a very early copy as it still has the banned sleeve on it, it is spelled ""Nightrian"" as opposed to ""Nightrain"". Just thought I'd point it out and wondered whether this has been noticed before? Adam "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000017
0.000011
== remzicavdar == Hallo there!!!! I was just making a Screenshot in Internet Explore!!!!!!!!!!
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000057
0.016971
" : Again with confusions. Diop did not do ""DNA"" tests on mummies. He attempted to extract melanin from skin to prove they were black. I don't know what this mysterious DNA testing is that ""silence speaks volumes as to why it hasn't [been done]"". Do you mean extracting DNA from ancient bones? It's not easy to do that. DNA degrades over time. Do you mean testing modern populations to model ancestry? That is being done, but actually there is often resistence from indigenous peoples who suspect some sort of experimentation is being performed on them. See this response to the Human Genome Diversity Project, an attempt to create a genetic map of all human populations . Your comments about visible features just indicate how enthralled you are by an archaic model of race, a model which actually justifies racial hierarchies. Only by taking the view that modern Africans, Aboriginal Australians etc are somehow ""stuck"" in a racial identity formed 50,000-70,000 years ago that has never changed can you really argue for commonality between these peoples, even then you are saying nothing about direct contacts between Africa and Mesoamerica. Such a view simply reinforces the old idea that black-skinned people are ""less evolved"" than other people, since, unlike others, apparaently they all remain ""the same race"" over tens of thousands of years. This view, btw, is not supported by genetics. "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000754
0.000345
" ::::Likewise! I think we have a reasonable basis now for moving forward. I've come across a footnote: ""For an indication of the popularity achieved by theistic evolutionism in the decade after the Origin of Species was published, see Alvar Ellegard, Darwin and the General Reader. The Reception of Darwin's Theoryof Evolution in the British Periodical Press, 1859-1873 (Goteburg: Acta Universitatis Gothenburgensis, 1958), esp. pp. 272-273."" but it appears that book content isn't online. Also, I'm coming to think this article would be better entitled ""theistic evolutionism"" ... || "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000012
0.000018
Thank you very much for the info and for taking your time to help me.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.00001
::Yes, if you could find a way to attach a copy of the e-mail, that would be great. Maybe you could send it through Yahoo! Mail? My e-mail address is charlesaaronthompson1@yahoo.com. As far as attaching a .PDF file in the infobox goes, I'm not sure how to do that either. My suggestion would be to look at this page, but then again, I don't know. It might have to be uploaded via a File Wizard. Also, I promise to not object or revert if you wanted to go ahead and change the colors to what they are in the e-mail copy. )
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000011
0.000019
:::::Hey look. it's BigRexRJ777II, if you create any more socks i won't be able to fit them all in one name
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000012
0.000045
I am, if I'm not mistaken, the one who added it, to make it parallel with the fact that we identified Michael Brown as being African American. And I'm white. So you can take out all of your anger on me.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000038
0.000052
" :::Hi, Esoglou. I see a WP:NPOV problem with the new item ""mainstream churches, as opposed to what are termed sects or cults"" — one man's heresy is another's orthodoxy, and although we need to recognize that many theologians (e.g., from evangelicalism or conservative Protestantism) consider their own beliefs to be (small-o) ""orthodox Christianity"" and classify conflicting beliefs as ""sects"" or ""cults"", all of these terms are arguably POV, and Wikipedia does not take any position on such disputes. Even ""mainstream"" is troublesome, I believe, given that some evangelicals go so far as to consider the Eastern Orthodox and Roman Catholic churches to be ""cults"". · "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.000078
REDIRECT Talk:Frank Richardson (police officer)
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.00001
about Roy Keane's dog masturbation
1true
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000011
0.00001
" == SA-Centrism == ""Oh, and also, what sort of insular existence do you live where you've never heard of SA? You didn't just pick up the internet recently, did you?"" Are you honestly this sad? Do you honestly believe that Something Awful is the Axis Mundi of the internet? Wow. Just wow. "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.003152
0.000973
" :::::::That will definitely help "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.00001
" == Your submission at Articles for creation == Your article submission has been declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sonic Router was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to resubmit once the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.00001
== Vietnamese prostitutes in Cambodia == http://www.thinkcentre.org/article.cfm?ArticleID=2257 http://web.archive.org/web/20090328122433/http://www.uri.edu/artsci/wms/hughes/vietn.htm http://web.archive.org/web/20110714161559/http://news.ncmonline.com/news/view_article.html?article_id=0b7fed90afde47e365d4fd1aba009689 http://sithi.org/temp.php?url=news_detail.php∣=4201 http://petercaton.co.uk/archive/social/the-chicken-farm-a-cambodian-prostitution-village http://intranet.mekonginstitute.org/2010/5.Regional_research_development_and_methodology_3_21may_2010/documents/Participant_Presentation/Presentation_7May/10_Trafficking%20of%20Vietnamese%20women%20and%20children_Hien.ppt http://allianceantitrafic.org/vietnam/vietnam_a.html http://www.acwp.org/index.php?option=com_content&task;=blogcategory&id;=18&Itemid;=51 http://www.acwp.org/index.php?option=com_content&task;=view&id;=66&Itemid;=99 http://hanoi.not.free.fr/bia_om.htm http://beta.globalmarch.org/worstformsreport/world/vietnam.html http://graduateinstitute.ch/files/live/sites/iheid/files/shared/summer/IA2012/protected/Week2/Gironde_Migration_and_Bonded_labour_210612.pdf http://www.cascambodia.org/trafficking_vietnam.htm https://www.diigo.com/user/Emailmesolly http://web.archive.org/web/20050716082650/http://www.uri.edu/artsci/wms/hughes/cambodia.htm http://www.catalystfoundation.org/our-founder http://www.ubspectrum.com/news/asia-at-noon-focuses-on-child-prostitution-1.1411477 http://www.wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/07HOCHIMINHCITY191_a.html
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000201
0.001214
"Suggestion 3: ""Lin has received attention for being an undrafted Asian American prospect from Harvard."" *support Summarizes the body and explains why the topic is notable and summarizes most important points. "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.000017
" == Edward Morgan Forester == Thank you for your recent article on Edward Morgan Forester. Unfortunately, you have misspelled this person's name, and Wikipedia already has an article on E. M. Forster. You are free to update that article with any new, verifiable information you have. "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000016
0.000014
's political affiliation?
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.00001
" == Swippy??? == Why did you move your user page to Swippy, if you haven't formally renamed your account? That is plainly inappropriate and misleading; do it again, and I'll see that you are blocked. If you're interested in in user name usurpation, please go here. Mr. Swippy registered in 2006 and , so you should be able to usurp his account with no problem. What does ""swippy"" mean, anyway? I went to Urban Dictionary and was not impressed by what I saw. "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000022
0.000364
==Bias== There seems to be a lot of biased in this article...it sounds like a visitor's bureau brochure on cedar hill. Which doesn't make much sense, because cedar hill sucks.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.102907
0.043165
== CHANGES TO DUARTE ARE TRUE == Wikipedia sucks.
1true
0false
1true
0false
0false
0false
1.000008
0.997221
barack obama is black
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.507375
0.000023
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to January 8. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.00001
== Linking to iTunes == I am going to remove the link to iTunes that you have reinserted into the 1973 article. Please read this . iTunes is both a commercial link and a site that requires specific software/registration to be used, and thus fails on two counts as an appropriate external link. Please do not reinsert iTunes links into this article or any other article. Thanks.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000011
0.00002
== flowers == hello friend this is wikipedea and this is about flowers flowers are glowing creaters remamber never ever hurt them
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000038
0.000606
sup my peeps japan sucks hola from mexico senioritas you suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuucccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccckkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
1true
0false
0false
0false
1true
0false
1.000009
0.068826
:::Can you think of any other article that's been nominated nine times? No? I think you have to be realistic, and not blame everyone else. Take responsibility. If there were really no issues it would not have required 9 FACs.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000011
0.000017
==John Virgo== You make him cry, you make him cry cry. Why you make him cry cry? You are a bad person. I think you will not have a success.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.994522
0.000221
== Source again: Hammerkop == Hi, Jim. Can you tell me your source for the original draft of Hammerkop? I'm especially worried about the statement that the nest is reused. The source I have (the Firefly Encyclopedia) says it abandons each nest after a few months and thus is building almost year-round. —
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000011
0.000051
Altho if y check site hes more softcore porn., tho well composed and photographed.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.00001
== for everyone who put warnings ! == Did you not read the top of the page? Don't you give a f***ing d*** about my requests? -ILikePikachu |
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.080745
0.236616
" ::::Taken as a whole the article can fairly to be said to be rather self-indulgent - though your reference to ""his self-indulgent nature"" is absurdly sweeping. But disproof on one Israeli mailing list is not the issue: :::::""...within hours, the internet - a vile institution which I do not use - was awash with stories that the United States had banned my entry to America because of my critical articles about the Bush administration or because I had long ago interviewed bin Laden or because I was so horrible that no democracy would ever let me stain its front doormat. This rubbish followed me round the world. In Australia to launch my book, I was asked - on 10 radio and television shows and in four lectures - how it felt to be banned from the United States. I must have spent a total of two hours collectively explaining that this was untrue. I had simply travelled on an old passport that was no longer valid for entry to the US. It was useless. In Scotland, a university academic introducing me to his audience by announcing that my articles 'must at last have got up the nose of the Bush administration' because I had been banned. The internet bullshit followed me to Dublin and then to Cork and then to Belfast. Nothing, it seemed, could switch off the message."" ::::Remember too that this is the guy who some people dislike enough that the internet term Fisking was coined. "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.109566
0.000913
== slutty whore == she was a sluty whore
1true
0false
1true
0false
1true
0false
0.999313
1.000009
" :Omg really? Have they all departed? That is so sad! ( I'm on the verge of leaving again. There's just too much crap going on. — "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.03129
0.005872
OK, i noticed that you contributed to the Blu-Ray page. so yes, you are a biased Sony fanboy. PLEASE refrain from future vandalism of the state of UMD. i know that you can't swallow the fact that it's a dead format.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.001984
0.000018
" == Taxobox removal == I removed the taxobox. The article seems to be about a common name that refers to most (or all) species of two cetacean families. :This was reverted here, with the edit summary Revert - information in infobox takes this into account, provides useful information. Dolphin is a common name for some species of the two families, not a single scientific taxon. The article explains this fact, I would not remove ""useful information"". The specious inclusion is very misleading, it is best explained in the article. What reliable source would state it refers to these two taxa, when some of them have the common name of whale? Why should the taxobox be used for an article about a non systematic name? ::I wouldn't have a problem with having two families in the taxobox, except that under current taxonomy this one is now incorrect. I am not concerned about the fact that some dolphins have a common name of ""whale"", since most authoritative sources would recognize those species dolphin species despite the common name, since all are in Delphinidae. But the problem is that the River Dolphins have now been split into multiple families, so just using ""Delphinidae and Platanistoidea"" is no longer correct. And rather than include five families in the taxobox, which becomes somewhat spurious, it seems better to remove the taxobox and discuss the taxonomy in the article. :::What if the family section is just left out? Or be given a note like ""See article""? I like the infobox and it does provide useful data and a basic glance at where dolphins fit in in the animal kingdom (it never fails to amaze me how many people do not seem to realise dolphins are mammals!). Looking at some other articles, there's no consensus on the infobox usage. The whale article has no infobox for example, while many others such as the shark, lizard or turtle articles do have them. ::I have a problem with original research being used in our document. This would include basing a taxon on a common name, there is no concordance between common names and biological nomenclature. A reader comes here to acquire facts, those few who do not know they are mammals can gain that information from the content proper of the article. The two families, or even five, are not given an accepted taxon; the fact that some reliable sources (also!) name some of the species as Dolphins is incidental, not authoritative. Everyone likes the taxobox, let us be careful with our names here most of all, it is not an infobox. I appreciate that the undue weight given to other names appended to the correct name may cause this misapprehension, but the consensus is that a taxobox should summarise a single taxon and be included in only one article. Whale is without one for reasons that are intimately linked with this article's title. The other examples you have given are [hopefully] given in RS that state, unequivocally, a common name refers to a taxon: ""Sharks (superorder Selachimorpha)""; ""Lizards (Suborder: Lacertilia) are a very large and widespread group of reptiles of the order Squamata"" [highly debatable, but still a single taxon]; and superorder Chelonia (turtles) is yet another reptilian (Sauropsida) example that needed resolving. Removing duplicated or specious (spurious) taxoboxes is never popular with those who had a notion to include them, I'm not sure why, but it is certain to be the right path for clarifying explanations to our dear readers. An article on the common name 'dolphin' is justified, it could be more than a dab, but it is not a taxon. Please undo the unfounded revert of my edit. :::All dolphins belong to the suborder of Odontoceti, every animal mentioned in this article does, so the taxobox ""tree"" is correct (especially considering my last edit) - so no incorrect data is given in the box. I don't feel the definition of a dolphin as used in this article is based on original research, but is what is quite commonly accepted as what animals are covered under the word dolphin. Encarta for example (in my opinion a good source for reference) also lists t
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000026
0.000036
:::Look it. :::You asked a dumb question; I gave you a nice, friendly, courteous answer. :::You didn't know how to do something; I told you how. :::And you continue to harass me. :::So go fly a kite, eh. :::
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.950437
0.977219
WHAT A SHIT COUNTRY
1true
0false
1true
0false
0false
0false
1.00001
0.166393
Look, you're a pedant, and Fetzer is a Jew-hater. On Press TV in the UK today - September 2nd 2011 - he said that the Israelis were behind 9/11. The man is a complete fool.
1true
0false
0false
0false
1true
1true
0.186579
0.000022
Stop. Seriously. Continue to force me to revert you, and I will go rouge admin on your ass, WP:BITE or no. Unlicensed pcitures are incredibly injurious to Wikipedia.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.304105
0.005371
== Nicole Oganesyan == hot girl
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.000012
I disagree with some of the things said here. Why shouldn't for instance Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri be on the list of muslims? They're muslims and they're notable, so why not include them? Because that might send the wrong image (that islam and terrorism are related)? Wouldn't that be the fault of people like bin Laden and al-Zawahiri?
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000675
0.000012
Just ask questions about games here.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.00001
" ::Clearly irrelevant. The language of the industry is Hindi and that's how it is officially and widely recognised. • '''' "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.000012
" :Nope, you're fine.   at "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.00001
I SOOOOOO was not being a dick. I think you're the dick. You, Tom Cruise and whoever locked my own page. This is my page, so I should be able to edit it how I wish.
1true
0false
1true
0false
1true
0false
0.948086
0.374515
== Pathetic == You can't let a guy have a bit of fun? That's just pathetic!
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.25692
0.00126
== FIND ANOTHER SCAPEGOAT == YOU JUST HAVE A PERSONAL VENDETTA AGAINST ME! NO OTHER ADMIN WOULD DO TO MY PAGE WHAT YOU DID! LOOK MAN I LEFT YOU BUDDY NICK BUSH24 ALONE, NOW LEAVE ME THE *$## ALONE. YOU EVEN BLOCKED ME ONCE WITHOUT WARNING WHEN I JUST CHANGED THE COLOR OF THE STREETLIGHT FIXTURE. F OFF OK!
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.999998
0.720115
== Her parents are both Sinhalese? == According to what source? I remember that it was written that her father was a Sinhalese-Portuguese mixed Sri Lankan and her mother is Malay (or at least from Malaysia). Ayan
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.000719
" ::Logo's are always better than anything else. "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.00001
" :::Well, I've already deleted the content from this article (it's been on the South Asia title for several days already), but since you object and RGPK indicated an issue with me being involved (which is a fair point), I will revert myself on this article. I am reading your support of the ""Indian Subcontinent"" title as support for the overall proposal, but that might be a reach. "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.000028
== Weymouth == Hello, I have requested that Weymouth, Dorset be moved back to Weymouth. Please leave any comments you may wish to add to the discussion here. Thanks.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.000067
החארות האלה בטח יתקשרו אליי מחר בבהלה ויתחננו שאני אלמד שם... ככה זה תמיד עם כאלה. הם מרגישים שלא בא להם להיות משוייכים אלייך, אז הם זורקים אותך. ברגע שזה מתאים להם - בכיף: תבוא. בכל מקרה מקום מסריח. כל מה שמעניין אותם זה הכסף. הרבה יותר גרוע מאוניברסיטה.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.008171
0.004134
" ==Thank you== I've finally had the time during my long Wikibreak to thank the voters and commentors on my my RfA last month, and I thank you! I'll try again as previously planned in the late of spring, and hopefully I'll win it. I sure learned my lesson on a fair use image misplacement!! When I get off Wikibreak I'll start visting xfD everyday. Do you have any tips or suggestions for me? Thanks again, X [] (|"
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000063
0.000214
Why on earth anyone cares what and how many edits any other user makes is beyond me, but here...
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.00001
==Image copyright problem with Image:ADF Command.JPG== Thanks for uploading Image:ADF Command.JPG. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy). The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000014
0.000041
":True, for example in this statement: ""In North America venison is less available at retail due to the requirement that the animal is first inspected by USDA inspectors."" North America is a continent not controlled by USDA inspectors. It would be nice to hear from our Canadian contributors about the availability of venison in major cities (as well as in the country) over there. "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000012
0.000018
OK, trimmed a little fat there.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00317
0.000012
" I do not think I need to mention it but behind these ""various IPs"" there are more than one user instead of a single one. It would be impossible for one to handle all your alleged crap. I don't think I need to mention it because it's totally irrelevant how many people oppose something. It does NOT count how many are on which side, it counts what is behind: arguments and truth. With your lies and will to mislead people by depicting the game as something it is not, you're runnining against a wall of truth and arguments and I'll make sure you won't tear that wall down, no matter if you're a biased AA players or a biased admin on the site. I'm right, and you know that very well. And even if you are in the majority, this rule remains true: ""Something is still right, even if everyone thinks it's not. Something is wrong even if everyone thinks it's right."" You don't EVEN think you're right, you just pretend! Knock off your pathetic pretence for I only accept the truth, and the truth only. I don't mind if your ludicrous opposition is kept up for years, it will end up without success and the feeling of having wasted your time with your hypocricy. Saying the game is primarily propaganda, I'll have the truth backing me. Equating it with advertisement and even pretending as if ""many players disagree(d) over which label fit(ted) better"", you back it with lies. As if anyone in the game knew anything! Search the official forum for the word ""propaganda"", you'll find nothing. ""Many""? What a liar you are. You represent not ""many"" players, you'll represent ONE. And you disagree just for the sake of disagreeing. If you're actually interesting in finding the truth, you'd have read the articles with an open mind and agreed on that. Actually I don't need to do this because it's not the truth you're seeking, but I've found another university page and would like to post it. http://www.minitrue.nl/essays/nmnc-aa/justin.html You didn't manage to read the talk page, so I'll summarize the most importent statements concerning our which-fits-better-topic. ""In this contribution I will also distinguish the advergame from the propagame in order to give a further analysis of America's Army."" ""The game America's Army, the propagame as I will call it, is unique in its being."" "" From advergame to propagame "" ""The message America's Army sends itself is propagandistic. It propagandises a certain kind of lifestyle message in which the army would like the participant to join and become. Propaganda itself has a history within religion. Religion also sends the same message, to let the participant (or the participant in becoming) join and become the religion (so sending the message of religion). So America's Army, with its governmental background, is instead of an advergame, better to be described as a propagame."" BETTER TO BE DESCRIBED AS A PROPAGAME. What did I say? PRIMARILY fits the definition of propaganda. =>Authority argument (university) underscores my version. ""When it comes to the propagame America's Army, the next quotation is striking: ""The initial success of America's Army has exceeded the Army's expectations, and Colonel Wardynski and his design team are excited about the possibilities. ""We're going to be pushing out new versions of the game as fast as we can build them,"" he says. ""This same team will be building missions, weapons, and new features for years to come."" The nation's youth can expect a lot more from their friendly army of one.""( 'America's Army' Targets Youth by Jacob Hodes & Emma Ruby Sachs)"" "" From the analysis of the advergame and the striking resemblance I have described with the propagame America's Army I will now turn my attention to the consequences for communication on Internet by such games."" "" The exception is America's Army because it communicates itself as a company in which citizens can join. The aim is to let the gamers themselves join the company as an employee and be the producers within of the message the army sends. One of the aims of advergames is to construct a process of viral marketing, but this is done unlike the propagame. The advergame aims that consumers virally communicate about the game or the message it beholds for the purpose of spreading the word, but not to become one with the company itself. DaimlerChrysler for example wouldn't make a game in which one is being trained to become the director of a car factory (this would create competition). Not yet (emphasised), but maybe in the future it will when one seeks for employees."" ""I thus called it a propagame: a game that propagandises a message to become the message. Within the game, gamers are disciplined and the power structures are like the common army power structure: top down hierarchical."" "" My investigation led me to b
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.001203
0.000283
Ugh, fuck it (pardon my french) I'll go take a look at it now.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
1.00001
1.00001
vanmanh is a neeeeeeeeeeek
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.00001
" ::*I was considering the fact that I saw it had ""unofficial website"" on one of the pages I looked at. Now I can't open any -s —  "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.000017
" :I'm in agreement with John. I don't think the photo adds anything to the article. Although I recall making a minor contribution to the cutline at some point, I fail to see the connection with ""Anti-Quebec sentiment"". English-language signs are no more Anti-Quebec, than uniligual Chinese signs in Vancouver are evidence of anti-Canadianism. Furthermore, to these eyes, only portions of two signs are legible. Is there any French? From what I know of Montreal history, it seems doubtful - but I can't make it out one way or another. "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000011
0.000022
== MW3: S&D; == A noteworthy instance of a popular game type with permanent death.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000022
0.010899
":::Thanks for your involvement and your feedback. Sincerely, "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.00001
":Tachyon - do you really think Sungenis just ""voluntarily"" removed the name ""Catholic"" as if it was just his idea? Nonsense. It's obvious from the record (including Sungenis's own account written at the Discover mag blog) that Sungenis knew he would have to stop calling his apostolate ""Catholic"" if he wanted to keep attacking Jews. This is what Sungenis meant by saying the bishop ""forced"" him to remove the name Catholic. This was no free will ""gee, I think I'll remove the name Catholic"". He knew it would be a further huge embarrassment to his apostolate if the Bishop came out with another public statement against him and canonically forced him to remove the name ""Catholic."" This really isn't that hard. So, it's true in only the most narrow and technical sense to say that he removed it ""voluntarily"". It would be like you saying to me, ""If you keep doing X, I'm going to shoot you."" And then I stop doing ""X"" before I get shot and go on to say ""I voluntarily decided to stop doing X"". It's nonsense, face-saving rhetoric. Sungenis was forced to stop calling his apostolate Catholic. He did so only under pressure, period. "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000304
0.000438
== مهزلة ؟ == موضوع الحرب على غزة وجهة نظر اسرائيلية فقط ولا يظهرون صور القتلى الفلسطينيين !!!! ما هو برأيك الحل المناسب
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000046
0.002112
:Since there was debate either way, it might be a good idea to lower case it anywhere it's upper case in the article, but we shouldn't be mentioning it if no sources do, and I'd advise against asking them to post something so that we can include it in the article. Primary sources should be avoided and it's not a good look to ask someone to say something so it can be included in their article. I wouldn't worry about asking them for anything else for the same reason.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.000011
Famous Residents? Are there any famous residents of Shavertown?
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.00001
"::::Genesis is pretty clear that is all has to do with descent, that's not something invented by ""Talmudist sects""; read the verses provided below. "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.000011
, 4 October 2010 (UTC) ::Thank you for the comments up there Paul, and the image of the Viaduct is picture perfect! Very true about Nathan Phillips Square as well, sort of repetitive, which is why I thought Y&D; Square was a good representation for a public square. 22:47
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.00001
::It's not a smear campaign. The Catholic Encyclopedia certainly has it's value for researching the catholic view of 1910. But using this article 10 times as a reference without telling our readers, that this is a view from colonial times is a deception respectively camouflage.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000145
0.000017
IIRC only primates have clavicles, but I'm not sure. Anyone clarify? Preacherdoc.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.00001
joshua rocks joshua rocks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!you suck you suck i rule you suck ha ha ha
1true
0false
1true
0false
0false
0false
1.00001
1.00001
" : After doing the math, here are the results. Skynyrd book, Kooper gets mentioned ""...every couple of pages..."". You didn't say 'every other' page, so I figured every 3rd page to put a real number to the implication. Next, the Wikipedia 'Kooper' article, Skynyrd gets mentioned every page. Tally results Kooper in Skynyrd book is 33 percent. Skynyrd in Kooper article is 100%. Mathematically, Skynyrd gets more coverage here in Kooper than Kooper got in Skynyrd. Just an observation. "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000029
0.000028
" == OTD edits == Hi, please make sure that when you add new items to OTD pages, to move the ones you replaced back into the hidden staging area so that they can be used again in later years. Thanks, —'''''' {} "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.000013
==Um WTF== how about you stay the fuck off my userpage... and stop putting ur shitty opinions on there, no one cares
1true
0false
1true
0false
1true
0false
1.00001
1.00001
" == Happy Halloween! == {| cellspacing=""0"" style=""background: #000000; border:5px solid orange; margin:0px auto;"" | | style=""font-size:10pt; text-align:center; padding:0pt; line-height:1.25em; color:orange;"" | Sp33dyphil has given you some caramel and a candy apple! Caramel and candy-coated apples are fun Halloween treats, and promote WikiLove on Halloween. Hopefully these have made your Halloween (and the proceeding days) much sweeter. Happy Halloween! If Trick-or-treaters come your way, add to their talkpage with a spoooooky message! | |} • "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000053
0.000148
This user GraYoshi2x is a vandal! Block him!
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.005359
0.000011
:Oh, I forgot the Bahamas. I guess I need to update my count.
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000013
0.00001
==Blood-traitor== You evil...
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.00001
0.00001
" :If you look at either the page history or my contributions you will see I have been removing stuff like, ""Crack is not used in the school when a fat student reveals his arse to the world when bending over..."", and infamous former pupils:George W Bush. I have blocked one vandal, and I will block the other if he vandalises again. No article should be left to people who have ""personal knowledge of the content"". "
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.0001
0.000866
:::::Gabe, just saw your second diff above; it's two and half weeks old and getting a little ripe for a revert by someone new to the discission. If you raise the issue as a point of discussion on the talk page, I will back your call for discussion on point. I don't recognize the person(s) involved, and further discussion may render the same result, but that would at least be the result of a level playing field, right?
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000019
0.000044
he smells like turky backen
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.001543
0.00001
"If allowed, please upload Lil Kim's remix; the opening line where she interpolated ""It's Britney bitch...and Lil' Kim.... Kimme Kimme More...."" *"
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0false
0.000025
0.000435