comment_text
stringlengths 1
5k
| toxic
class label 2
classes | severe_toxic
class label 2
classes | obscene
class label 2
classes | threat
class label 2
classes | insult
class label 2
classes | identity_hate
class label 2
classes | prediction_hate
float64 0
1
| prediction_nsfw
float64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
:::Jeez Ed, you seem like a fucking shitty douchebag | 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 1.00001 | 1.00001 |
":::Great. -
" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
== Rawls' criticism ==
I cannot find where in Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy Rawls criticizes Nozick in the way this article says. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000013 |
FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF
FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF | 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 1.00001 | 1.00001 |
"
:Hi. Well, in my opinion USA has both Force and Justice on their side in this case. By ""Justice"" I don't mean human legal system. I mean Justice, as one of the highest principles (I have to mention this because it seems I wasn't quite clear about that in the previous post, so you misunderstood it). I have to admit I don't quite see what you're trying to do with mentioning again UN Charter and other documents. I've already said - those are lists of UN wishes. It's not a law per se, and thus it is not convenient to use the word ""guarantee"". UN is in no position to guarantee anything. UN can use a Force just like any single nation, but what they do is not ""legal"", and I already explained that in the previous post. UN works on a mob principle, similar to democracy. If you have Force strong enough to impose something, and a will behind that Force, then you do it. If not, you don't. My parallels with French revolution are very much relevant, and I would still like to hear your answer: do you support French revolution and democracy or not, even though such a thing was ""illegal"" then as much as Kosovo is illegal today? Also, do you consider USA an 'illegal' state, considering that their independence was illegal? And one more thing regarding legality - do you consider invasion of Iraq legal, and if not, what is UN doing in punishing the countries who invaded Iraq? If UN cannot or does not want to punish countries that invaded Iraq, your whole point of ""UN law"" or ""International law"" goes down the drain, instantly. One of the requirements of ""law"" is having a Force strong enough to impose it, and to make sure everyone obeys it. If there is no Force sufficient to ensure adherence to the law, then there is no law - it's a list of good wishes. One can then say that independence of Kosovo is against the wishes of some, but that hardly has any relevance at all when those whose wishes are for the independence are stronger. Back to your post. I agree with you that UN was made to protect stability and peace, and that's why I don't like UN. If UN was there to manifest Justice, I would support it. As it is, I don't respect UN, and I think not respecting UN is a good thing (you made it sound like it's a bad thing). To answer your question: not every minorities want independence, and those minorities who want it should get it. That's right, if Istria in my country wanted independence I'd be among the first to vote in their favor. I have entirely different concept when it comes to self-determination of minorities. I reject the idea of national state, I think it's a flawed concept which was historically useful as much as democracy was historically useful and as mush as the tyranny of Peisistratos was useful. It's not a concept that's in itself good, but it's a concept which helped bring a civilization to the next level. I wanted to make explanation a bit longer but this section of Wikipedia doesn't allow it so I won't bother. To sum it up: I think a country should be run so well, that no one in their right mind would even want to break-off. And if someone does want to break-off for whatever reason, an economic (and other) alliance should be made to neutralize bad side effects of having too many small countries (a concept similiar to USA or EU). Oh, and regarding the last part of your msg - I repeat, there is no such thing as 'relevant international law'. Also, ""whether the law is enforced or not, that's another story"" is a very strange figure of speech, since a law that is not enforced is not a law at all. It's a list of good wishes. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000126 | 0.000273 |
Azerbaijanis Proud of Ramil Safarov
If I had the same opportunity under same circumstances, i would kill both bastard and mother fucker armenians bitches soldiers for insulting Azerbaijani flag. Bastard gurgen lay in hell mother fucker. I fuck your soul and your whore mother. Assholes. Fuck armenian fascists and natinoalists. | 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 1true
| 1true
| 1true
| 1.00001 | 1.00001 |
Additions of http://.amazingregistry.com
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000128 |
"Previous two dudes, you're obviously close-minded dogmatists of ""Rationalism"". You should honestly investigate claimed supernatural phenomena so you don't live bad lives and end up in Hell. You're the irrational one by insisting without proper investigation that such phenomena is automatically bogus. And shame on the next dude for just parroting a false and malicious conclusion. You show forth your stupidity in the most abberant manner. I am a real scientist and I have examined what evidence is available to me regarding claims about Therese Neumann. She was a Saint and her phenomena proof of the truth of Catholicism, which she herself indicates by her manner of life. She's not an isolated case. There's thousands of well-documented and reliable accounts of modern and past supernatural phenomena on the part of Catholic Saints that backs up their claims that Jesus founded the Catholic Church and that it's the only true religion.
Everybody with wisdom realizes Wikipedia has a heavy liberal bias and won't give us the truth on almost anything. Giving both sides of the story here is not truth. Therese Neumann is one of thousands of messages from God to the world that it should be Catholic.
And Neumann, if the yogi dude isn't lying, probably either didn't understand his words (Eastern religious jargon) or just wanted to be nice and not cause a fight. If he wanted her opinion, in Western cultures, you ask the person straight-forward. Hinduisms are not at all like Catholicism. Hinduisms are more like 'I think I am one, therefore I am'. Catholics are Catholics only if they do and say what the Church defines that Catholics do. E.G. murderers commit a mortal sin and stop being Catholics. And I'll be honest with you, guys like that would lie about what she said just to use her for their scheme. It seems more in line with what honest people record her saying that she told him he'd go to Hell if he didn't become a Catholic.
" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.046581 | 0.001224 |
The article cites the IUCN red list and states that the species is Near Threatened however on searching the IUCN Red List the Monarch Butterfly has not even been evaluated. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000012 | 0.000019 |
:That's bogus! That garbage would never be included in a real encyclopedia. So you can slander whoever you want, as long as it is sourced right? And the person isn't alive to defend themselves. I guess wikipedia isn't big on integrity. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.016116 | 0.000731 |
", 1 August 2005 (UTC)
#:::You're being ridiculous - please assume good faith. I do not seek to ""deny readers access"" to these conclusions; I just question their relevance. All major figures from the Clinton Admin who posited an al Qaeda-Saddam link have since changed their minds. You have to realize that our understanding of al Qaeda was in a pretty primitive state before 9/11, because so few took them seriously, and the ones who did, perceived them through older models of analysis (the ""state sponsored terrorism"" thesis) that are not as relevant to a diffuse network like al-Qaeda. People cite the fact that Richard Clarke used to think there was a link as if it proves that the link must be true. Oddly, these are the same people who dispute Clarke's credibility now. It seems they're incapable of understanding that people can change their minds about something when confronted with new evidence about it. I'm also unclear why you say I want to refuse people access to the conclusions of Judge Baer I clearly left that item in the timeline. But don't pretend these opinions have the same weight as a bipartisan commission assigned with the specific mission to investigate these sorts of things, especially when their conclusions have the benefit of years of hindsight (as opposed to the opinions of some Clinton admin members back in 1998). Some Clinton officials e.g. Daniel Benjamin investigated the al Q link with the belief that they would have found links to Saddam, and were surprised when their research proved the opposite. I think it's silly to think that we should give greater weight to what these people said in the mid- to late-1990s than their conclusions after years of further research specifically focused on the issue. 23:17" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000035 | 0.000091 |
"
: Please do not stikethrough someone else's comments. Have you any idea how arrogant and rude that comes across? Followup, by all means, but that's just not on - " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000023 | 0.000011 |
This message is regarding the article Football. Please stop removing content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000011 | 0.00001 |
"
:Umm... exactly what ""mainstream"" are you referring to?
::Well, the mainstream academic community for one. I mean, outside the lit-crit cult. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000119 | 0.000174 |
We might just all be dicks trying to look serious when talking about two girls shitting in a cup and eating chocolate. | 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 0.145373 | 0.000187 |
"
== Your changes to the GDP rankings in the UK article ==
You have three times now changed the changed the ranking of the GDP of the UK in the infobox without providing a reliable source for the change, and also without also changing the corresponding information in the lead paragraph, leading to contradictory information. You have also not been providing an edit summary for your changes; while not required, this is a courtesy that makes it easier for other editors to understand the reason for your changes.
Please come to the article discussion page to talk about the changes to the rankings. Thank you, " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000011 |
"
""delivering nicotine to the end-user"" is a health claim and even with it wasn't this ref is not suitable and especially not suitable for the lead. · · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00007 | 0.000014 |
You rock! Thanks for your help | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
::::::::Third opinions serve as a way of getting a bit more consensus when it's just two users going back and forth without any real consensus. I joined the discussion when the page was listed for a third opinion. My place in the discussion is irrelevant; it's no different than if I had randomly stumbled upon the page and joined the conversation. Wikipedia allows all editors the ability to do that.
::::::::If you want somewhere else to go, try RfC. I'm not really willing to moderate, as this whole page is incredibly frustrating to me. To be honest, John, you're not being helpful. Weren't you just banned for 24 hours for disruptive editing? I'm sorry, but I can't work with an editor who's not willing to work towards a compromise. I've gotten so lost in the endless debate that I don't even know what the original focus is anymore.
::::::::But that's neither here nor there. I'm going to wait to see how the AfD is resolved. — [ · ] " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000016 | 0.000036 |
who is DJMASACRE?
what the heck is a sockpuppet ? If this is what happens on wikipedia then this is really pathetic. So much for finding information here, its just filled with garbage. ( | 1true
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.784766 | 0.000012 |
You are still not acting in good faith - you are still playing the brother card - do you not understand what is required? You need to just come clean forrest. Hell even I'd welcome you back in the fold as you were a good editor leaving aside all this nonsense. Stop with this brother nonsense and let's move on | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.225269 | 0.000128 |
:Sorry, I'm not trying to vite the newcomers. Welcome, honestly. -) | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000028 | 0.00001 |
"==May 2012==
Thank you and welcome on Wikipedia. Your recent edit to Dekha Ek Khwaab has been deleted as the information was wrong and the character, that's Yuvraj Udayveer Singh, is not the protagonist of the mentioned show. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000015 | 0.00001 |
:In future, I highly recommend that you check the edit in question before you accuse someone of vandalism. - | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000012 | 0.00001 |
"
::LOL @ Bobblehead! too bad the ""president"" wouldnt technically qualifiy anymore illinois Smith Jones " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
:I searched the system for it, but I could not find the email in question. What was the subject header of the email Mr. Johnson-Laird sent? -'''''' " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
My mom hits me very very very very very very very very very very very hard on the head. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000097 |
"
== Totally Biased Anti-Zionist Article ==
The tone of this article is all wrong and it definitely biased against Zionist and Jews.
The purpose of building homes in Israel is not to ""prevent the return of refugees"" or ""exert control over Arabs"" it's simply to build the Jewish homeland. I'm so dissapointed that you have to go to sneaky means to advance your battle against the Jewish state." | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000024 | 0.000016 |
Seeing as the userspace draft hasn't been edited in a week, I just moved the text here so that other Wikipedians can work on it. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
:Yeah your right. And dude I'm not fucking with you. I'll give you some links to look at to prove it. It's real, it's damn real ""Kurt Angle"" 1968-." | 1true
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 1.00001 | 0.998691 |
::Ouch! I forgot about that. Thanks! | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
::Agreed with what VictorD7 stated above. If we are to include a specific mention of this conflict, we should in a summarized way expand it to include those aspects that are presently left out, thus giving the reader a fuller understanding why we mentioned that conflict out of all the American Indian Wars. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000012 |
:OK, the most important issues and positions seems to be covered. I'll probably refer back to this in the discussion and we might want to do a straw poll on what positions we have later. Or is that a stupid idea? | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.004354 | 0.00003 |
: I think that is better. The current format is running off the right side of my screen. Of course I can scroll, but that is bad. , | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000193 |
== AfD close? ==
Cbl, would you like to close Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gator Football Ring of Honor, and we can move the merge discussion to the article's talk page? | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000011 |
:: I was not aware of a new way to add references. If in doubt, or a hurry, I sometimes just add a bare url in tags, and a wikignome or bot will come along afterwards and improve it. Something is always better than nothing, no matter what format. (or Hrothulf) | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000019 | 0.000104 |
Wikipedia does tend to attract fringe opinion, so it could be royalist comment. Who knows? De jure (as you know of course) means 'in law'. But who's law? And how do you define what is lawful? Parliament made the law because, in my opinion, England's king would not rule justly. It was the lawful authority by default. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000029 | 0.000041 |
Image:David Cameron - World Economic Forum Annual Meeting Davos 2010.jpg|60px]]
|
| 2010 | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
== A request for March 29 ==
]]
Hi, would you consider running this image on March 29? That would match the 50th anniversary of the release of Some Like It Hot, which was filmed at this location. The movie stars Marilyn Monroe and the American Film Institute rated it as the best American comedy of all time. Seems like an engaging matchup. Best wishes, '''' " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000016 |
":::::Common sense is based on common knowledge. There is no common sense on Wikipedia. ()
" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
::::::::The 1RR restriction was for a limited time, and it ran out back on October 27th of last year. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000038 | 0.00001 |
":::I don't know; I wouldn't even have a guess. ''''''
" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
== Using a trout safely ==
When wielding a trout against another editor as you did here it is helpful to explain your point of view. It is very little help being hit by a fish if it does not come with an explanation of why it was deserved. Even without a trout involved it is helpful to explain your point of view at a MfD and not simply say Keep. Perhaps you could enlighten us at that debate to the reasoning behind your position and fish swinging? " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000013 | 0.000029 |
"
:Just to clearify things, the edit to which she refers is my redirecting of a page which only content (apart from tags) was: ""Archie Gets a Job was an unpopular comic book published by Archie Comics. It only had one issue."" Damn, I should be blocked for doing such a thing, shouldn't I? ¬¬' " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000569 | 0.000162 |
"
:::It's also worth noting this editorial on the SSCS website: ""Cetaceans Society International Attacks Sea Shepherd for Saving Dolphins"", April 28, 2009. It cites this Wikipedia article. The conclusion is ""Sea Shepherd is saving the lives of whales and dolphins. Rossiter is using his organization to attack Sea Shepherd and slandering our name on Wikipedia and who knows where else."" Even if we didn't quote CSI directly, we could quote the SSCS rebuttal, which is allowed for comments about their own activities and views.
" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000019 | 0.000128 |
your beat as hell stop getting rid of my cool junk aight homie i know we can get along why must we fight ;0 | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 1true
| 0.091001 | 0.000034 |
Back again. I have posted responses to your recent comments. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
* Yeah, regarding some kind of ""High-end Bottled Drinking Water Expo"" in 2014. What the hell is going on here? I'm gonna strike it." | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.986061 | 0.000595 |
"
:If Gorilla honestly thinks GamerGate is just about defaming and threatening women or that Mozilla allowing a female supporter of GamerGate to express her views on the issue was ""legitimizing the abuse of women"" then she should recuse. Seems clear that Gorilla has the ""neutrality is not acceptable"" take on GamerGate. Being an editor on the topic would not be a big deal, but there is no way in hell someone should be acting as an arbitrator when they have such an attitude on the subject. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000426 | 0.000187 |
REDIRECT Talk:S.O.A.P. (Danish band) | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
::::::Fair enough. (I've been known to jump to the wrong conclusion before as well; I made one of the comments on my user page as a direct result of my own goof of a similar nature.) of
" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000016 | 0.00001 |
"
== Totally off-topic comment ==
One of the alt titles for Up Your Ass is ""From the Cradle to the Boat"". For a while I had no idea what this meant, but I finally figured it out. The ""cradle"" is a reference to the poem ""The Hand That Rocks the Cradle"" (coincidentally a stub I wrote) that is about the role of women as mothers. The ""boat"" is a reference to the phrase ""rock the boat"", which was a political phrase before it was put into that song in the 1970s. In other words, Solanas believed that women should advance from ""rocking the cradle"" (motherhood) to ""rocking the boat"" (political upheaval). Pretty clever. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000106 | 0.001531 |
"
::::::::::The caption being wider that the image also looks a bit off. Putting text in a constrained space will always be problematic (consider readers which have large font sizes set). Perhaps bumping the image sizes is not so bad after all, if captions are considered an option. {{}} " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000289 | 0.000033 |
"
:::Shahid, do you think is a sock. His editing pattern and modus operendi seem to suggest this could be the case (especially his asinine editing comments followed by ""!!!!!!!!"". Let me know what you think. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
==Bailando Bolivia seasons article==
The community has decided that at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bailando Bolivia that Bailando Bolivia seasons that you have created do not belong in Wikipedia and that they should be deleted. Please do not make them again. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000016 |
:(after ec)(outdent) Be BOLD on editing articles, naturally; but your userpage should show your interests on wikipedia. And only that. Illustrating prejudice/racism/sectarianism will attract unwanted attention. That is, people will scrutinise every edit you make if you appear to be a racist/bigot. You don't want that attention. Imagine this is a job interview, in a way, it's best to say what you're good at, rather than stating prejudices...you wouldn't get the job then, would you? -) | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.0002 | 0.000027 |
"
== Anarcho-fascism ==
Great TNX for bot activity! ""Слава Роботам!!!"" (c) " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000011 |
bacteria is sicko | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"Also, as far as listing contemporary artists, I think the shorter the list the better. A fair listing would be exhaustive, overwhelming and completely unnecessary. Readers simply need to be directed to the ""contemporary artists"" page. There are a few exemplary artists that should be included in the article, like Robert Smithson. But discussion should focus on specific ideas or approaches these artists introduced that developed contemporary art in general.
I would like to take this challenge on! It may take me a few weeks to get it organized and improved, but I don't think it's an impossible task. I will need and will greatly appreciate your support and input as I tackle this mountain. Thanks!
" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000034 |
::Your reply here though has failed to assume the good faith of in raising this with you. It's not the first time you have added ridiculous statements to peoples pages and I too now agree with that your comment, though it appeared in jest, is uncivil. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000012 | 0.00001 |
zadignose]] 03:47, 27 June 2007 | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"You say, . But that is a recurrent theme; indeed, it had been debated at Talk:Ludwig van Beethoven#Infobox, another infobox RfC that you closed as ""... there is consensus that there should be an infobox"". I'd be interested to hear what factors have made the inclusion of the infobox in Beethoven's article appropriate, but not here.
" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000021 |
==Environmental Record Task Force==
Hi Nils,I hope you'll come check out this projectto judge by your userpage, you might be interested in lending a hand. cheers, | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
== List of manga artists ==
I see no reason why List of manga artists should be deleted, as numerous similar lists exist and seem to be maintained (for example List of American comics creators
or List of science fiction authors). There are many articles tagged as being in the scope of Wikipedia:WikiProject Index that are equally broad or broader. While I don't know if those articles generally have support on Wikipedia or not, if you think articles of that sort do not belong on Wikipedia, then it would probably be best to start a discussion on that sort of article in general. For the List of manga artists article, I do however think it should be limited to manga creators with Wikipedia articles (which seems to be what is done for other similar lists). | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000014 |
" —Preceding unsigned comment added by " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
==zoroasterian false claims==
It is rediculous to claim that Zoroaster proclaimed Ahura Mazda as the monothiest god of manking for the first time in history in the times of Cyrus and the father of King Darius the great around 700 BC.
It is more rediculous that in no time Zoroaster declared yet another unborn god Ahriman yet as another god hence Dualism.
It is known that the first ever writings of Zoroaster was his dream of seeing Ahuramazda the one god well known so to the iranians for time immmemorial , then declaring seeing another god like a shadow to ahura mazda in the second dream two weeks later as he writes.
It is well known that Zoroaster is the first man claiming another unborn god hence he is the father of dualism. he was no revealed religins-prophet like monothiestic religion (Noah, Abraham=Judaism, christianity and islam) for he declares getting his knowledge from dreams never spoke to god or a messenger of god). It is impossible to dissociate Ahoramazda from Magusis the adherants of Dualism, of whom King Darius the Great clearly declared a war on them by killing the Magusi sardis the usurpur of the kingship and declaring a yearly day celebration called (the day of the killing of the magusi Magimortis) in which he allowed his people to kill any magusi (dualism adherant) in that day even in the magusi;s own house, this is why magusis used to hide in that day in other places in that day of the year.
Obviously much later after Darius the Great that the Magusis (adherants of Zoroaster) managed to take control of the great Persian kingdum) which caused its demise , the magusis continued control of the poor persian people who hated magusis until islam freed them from those magusis and deported them back to their home land India.
It is known that Magusi in semitic is same as Nagusi ( ie dirty person: a person who uses magic by invoking evil spirits by using dirty (Nagis) stuff such as wolf's tail or putting urine in foood or drink to do favours to women for money (like a woman who wants her husband to love her again or to get pregnant etc). It is well known that the magusis were not from Persia but a low cast from India like gypsies who used to do dirty works for the Persians namely slaughter of animals) that is when they started making future predictions (fortune telling) by studying the signs on the liver of the slaughtered animals. Zoroaster was one of those Magusis who was a great Magician (do magic by dirty stuff) and proclaiming for the first time in history the ideas of Dualism in an official religion. Arabs said in their ancient writings before islam that Zoroaster so disgusted people that they gave him the nick-name Shuraik (ie who adds another god to G-d) since pagans and poly-thiests since ancient times belied that the other gods they worship were not just representations (spirits) of the one mighty god, however Zoroaster was the first to declare a shadow god to the mighty g-d hence God of light and god of darkness to explain the inequality and injustise in the world (remember they were a low cast from india avoided by people (magusis used to live away from villages just like gypsies because they were considered dirty lowly (heathen) posessed by evil spirits they get from the animals they slaughter for the persians).
Even the word Magic, Magician, Magi (plural of Magusi in English) come from the magusis of Persia who were not native of Iran but gypsies from India who use Magis=Nagic=Dirty stuff to do their witchcraft and favors to stressed women and men throughout history).even in our times!!
Conclusion Ahura Mazda The name of the Monothiest God in Ancient Persia has nothing to do with dirty Zoroaster prophet of Dualism who appeared circa 700 BC very very late in the history of manking. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.002178 | 0.001222 |
"==Demon kiss (upcoming novel)==
I sympathized with your comment in the prod tag you placed on the above-captioned page. I decided that material about a novel without any mention of the author or publisher was ""not enough context to identify the subject""; this might be useful to you in the future.
" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000011 | 0.000011 |
:Good point. I've made some changes more closely based on the cited sources. This isn't Urban Dictionary, but people have a go at adding their LOLs to articles like this sometimes anyway. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
Reagan is quite a kollama | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000012 | 0.00001 |
I'd love to | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
(british diplomacy in support of the arabs | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
::Fine work! The article is worse off for it.... | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
Editorial hatchet
This article appears to be a happy target for minor silliness. I am cutting everything that looks dubious to me and is unsourced. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000013 |
:Guana Heights is what it is called in General George Washington by Edward G. Lengel. Perhaps just a different name?- | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
Wann gibt es schlechte Nachrichten für die Pharmaindustrie | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.266795 | 0.000011 |
:Looks like a campaign bus on TV today. Looks like a duck, quacks like a duck ... | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000357 | 0.002785 |
March 2008 (UTC)
:::Interesting thoughts. But still, in order to show associativity, using this example, one would have to define what a function composition is. That sort of defeats the original purpose of the example: explaining a group while avoiding a formal definition. The definition of a*b by (a*b)(x) = a(b(x)) would look awfully circular to the layman in the context of associativity. − 08:57, 17 | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000015 | 0.000011 |
http://www.goodwillgames.com/html/past_1990athletics.html
You are a Nazi? supporter of apartheid? return the names of the people | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000048 | 0.000028 |
RACISM AGAINST WHITES IN AMERICA
The level of racism against the white population in America is something difficult to understand in Europe. ¿Why such a hate against whites in America?¿Why Americans hate whites so much?¿Why Americans discriminate against whites at any occasion? It is sad. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00775 | 0.000014 |
== Block ==
Why did you block me and though me a sockpuppet of a vandal? Just curious. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000016 | 0.002675 |
"
:::Nice work – a great improvement. I also noticed that this article has never really had substantial information about Māori society or social organisations: there's no real explanation of what iwi and hapū are, no mention of the word marae anywhere in the article, and nothing on organisations such as rūnanga and hauora (and soon Whānau Ora). A Māori navbox is probably long overdue as well. If there are no objections, I'll draft these up today and start adding them tomorrow. Cheers. – • " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000012 | 0.000061 |
:::::When an article is published as an editorial, and classified as an editorial by PubMed then it is editorial. Where is your evidence that it is a review? Or WP:MEDRS compliant? | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000019 | 0.00001 |
==Removing Luther OR==
I joined the Enclopedia Britanica to look at their article on Luther, and Weber is not mentioned. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000011 | 0.00001 |
Suck a dick assholes | 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 1.00001 | 1.00001 |
occupy.
PS. I don't compromise with censorious dictators. I'll say what I want when I want. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000264 | 0.000018 |
"
==Vandal killing==
That was fast! Thanks!! " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
Possible misogynist readings of his lyrics? This sounds like speculation and probably doesn't belong in the wiki.
- | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000017 |
:::::::I agree with this comment by . '''''' | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
== Semi-protected edit request on 12 April 2014 please remove the pictures illustrating prophets figure == | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
== Sisters Upset Communion Being Turned into Political Issue ==
Here is a statement from the website of the Sisters.
We can certainly now start to build this into the article.
Sisters Upset Communion Being Turned into Political Issue
""We are dismayed that a moment of genuine communion during sacred worship is being twisted for political gain by the forces of hatred and dissension. — Sister Edith Myflesh, Current Abbess of the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence, Inc.
SAN FRANCISCO — On Sunday the 7th of October, the morning of the Castro Street Fair, two members of the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence® attended Mass at Most Holy Redeemer Church. Most Holy Redeemer is located in the Castro neighborhood of San Francisco and ""prides itself in being an inclusive Catholic community."" The service was an opportunity to welcome the new Archbishop of San Francisco, Most Rev. George Niederauer. While at Mass the Sisters joined other parishioners in respectful and sincere worship and received Communion from the Archbishop. After the services, they stayed to socialize with the congregation before moving on to attend the Castro Street Fair.
Sadly, while the Sisters participated in the celebration, others not there to worship secretly filmed and photographed the Mass hoping to spark a controversy and cast the parishioners of Most Holy Redeemer and the Archbishop in a negative light. These professional muckrakers then gave the photos to an anti-gay Fundamentalist Catholic Website which in turn sent them to right-wing media outlets who willfully distorted the facts for political gain.
The Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence are appalled that some media outlets have unwittingly spread these distortions while others have intentionally taken advantage to fuel a mean-spirited and divisive political agenda. These forces have been critical of Most Holy Redeemer for their welcoming approach to the diverse community they serve and have frequently seen fit to attack the parishioners as part of a larger campaign against ""San Francisco values.""
Our hearts go out to the parishioners of Most Holy Redeemer and to the Archbishop who have been unfairly stigmatized by these disingenuous campaigns for doing nothing more than following the welcoming teachings of Christ and administering Communion in keeping with the teachings of the Second Vatican Council.
We would like to take this opportunity to state again that, contrary to the spin of right-wing fanatics, that the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence do not ""mock nuns"" but live ""as nuns,"" taking vows that affirm the traditional compassionate and justice-seeking ministries of religious women, extending their reach beyond the convent walls to those most in need. We are open and supportive of all forms of spirituality that teach respect for human life, diversity, freedom and community, including those of the Catholic Church. In fact, we have given several thousand dollars in grants to several religious-based organizations, including Most Holy Redeemer.
It is no secret that our vows sometimes call us to challenge the dogmas and hypocrisies of the Catholic hierarchy, in the same way they call us to confront politicians and even leaders within the queer community whenever they use their power and influence to promote fear, shame, division, and self-hatred. It is a bittersweet irony that these same forces of fear and shame now use the media to twist a moment of genuine communion into another justification for policies that harm people of faith and members of the LGBTQ community.
In keeping with our vows to expiate stigmatic guilt and promulgate universal joy, the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence call on all people of good faith to oppose those who would desecrate the sanctity of a church and defile a moment of true communion for cheap political gain. In a world wracked by violence and fear, we have no time for such lies and will continue to serve our community by boldly proclaiming that joy is more powerful than shame.
We extend our sincerest gratitude and affection to the parishioners of Most Holy Redeemer and hope that their new Archbishop continues to walk with them in service to the gospel of joy and justice.""http://www.thesisters.org/MHR_Release.html" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000461 | 0.000469 |
They do not have the same kind of stake in making sure information ir reliable because their goal is to sell a product (which sometimes mean they have a stake in distorting information to make products seem better than they actually are in various ways). Newspapers, authors of books, historical societies, etc. are selling a product to but it is an information product with them standing behind it. A retail site selling a toy train provides product information details about the toy because people don't buy products without information on them, but they are selling the toy train, not the information. Moreover, information products are often written by people trained in providing information; researchers, librarians, journalists. So ask yourself: Who's writing the blurb accompanying the toy train and what procedures are in place to make sure it's accurate? | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000471 | 0.000665 |
"==Name of article?==
* Couldn't go with ""Las Ramblas"", as that redirects to ""La Rambla"". It's still a ""proposed"" casino, so didn't feel right calling it Las Ramblas Resort and Casino. Could have gone with ""Las Ramblas, Las Vegas"", to match the title that Aladdin currently has. Oh, so many choices to choose from. Any suggestions? " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000038 | 0.000161 |
== SWD316 ==
Yes I agree with you. He once removed my answer and redid his question. I did tell him not to do it again. I have noticed that he doesn't think before he posts, and frequently find that when I answer him I get an edit conflict because he has changed his post. I see this also with his page edits, he uses a new edit for almost every single change, maybe to up his edit count or something, or just that not thinking part. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000038 | 0.00054 |
== Dick Tooth ==
Well done on recent edits to Dick Tooth - much more elegant! | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000322 | 0.081832 |
]]
These birds are also called the Alexandra parrot, Queen Alexandra parrot (or parakeet), Princess of Wales parakeet, rose-throated parakeet and spinifex parrot. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000014 | 0.000057 |
::: To much sources kills the sources.... ) We have others sources and links about Hungary, and in english ;) | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
== Wikimania 2007 ==
I thought this is interesting. . Other than budget-wise, I think an event here looks pretty feasible. - | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000011 |
"
::::So let's say the lowest dimension can be 220 minimum? " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
:::::I think the problem only arises once you move beyond animals and into computer science, which is not within the scope of this article. Which author is right about how to design algorithms is irrelevant - the article is about collective behavior in biological animals, and how that arises and evolves. How and why animals arrive at a particular state is often very, very different from human design, or even from what's optimal. Your references might be very relevant to the articles Swarm_intelligence or Collective_behavior, but this article has a narrower scope, restricted to non-human animals in nature. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000011 | 0.000016 |
==SHUT UP !!!==
YOU'RE VERY SILLY TO CHANGE EPISODE NUMBERS WHENEVER !!! IT'S OUR BUSSINESS ! NOT YOURS ! GOD !!!! WHEN ARE YOU GOING TO GIVE UP THAT ??? WE'RE RIGHT ! OK ??? AND YOU ARE VERY STUPID BECAUSE SEASON 2 HAS 24 EPISODES !!! SO, THERE IS 87 REGULAR EPISODES NOT 86 !!! WHEN ARE YOU UNDERSTAND THAT YOU'RE WRONG !!! I'M NOT THE ONE WHO TRIES TO CHANGE THE EPISODE NUMBERS BUT I WON'T DO LIKE THEM ! OK ? YOU WANT TO PLAY ? OK ! WE'LL PLAY TOGETHER ! BUT I SWEAR YOU THAT WIKIPEDIA AND YOU, IT'S OVER ! I'LL TELL AT AN ADMINISTRATOR THAT YOU ARE SELFISH AND IT'S NOT POSSIBLE TO WRITE IN DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES' PAGE WITH YOU !!! IT'S OVER !!! AND ALL THE MEMBERS WHO AGREE WITH THE 24 EPISODES OF SEASON 2 WILL DO SOMETHING ! IT'S SURE !!! IT'S THE END OF YOUR DAYS ON WIKIPEDIA !!! STOP ADAM ! STOP ADAM ! STOP ADAM !!! | 1true
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 0.999866 | 0.830018 |